alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dril-Quip, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary D. Smith, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|                                                          
|/s/ Gary D. Smith                                         
|Gary D. Smith Co-Chief Executive Officer
February 28, 2008
STATE v. Colden Aujuai COLLINS.

No. 140P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of March 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2006."
Order entered October 13, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05 - 14 - 00459 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF C .E.W., A CHILD On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 366 - 56270 - 2011 

### O RDER In light of appellee’s October 13, 2014 letter stating he i s withdrawing his October 9, 2014 unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief because he was able to timely file the brief, we DENY as moot appellee’s extension motion.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 978/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 978/2013 of 11 October 2013 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities            guaranteed [Sklandrausis (TSG)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 978/2013                     

# of 11 October 2013

# entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed [Sklandrausis (TSG)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products                              and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed(2).

(2)Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, Latvia’s application to register the name ‘Sklandrausis’ was published                              in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Sklandrausis’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 October 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products and foodstuffs listed in Annex I, point II, to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012:

### **Class 2.3.****Confectionery, bread, pastry, cakes, biscuits and other baker’s wares**U.K.

#### LATVIAU.K.

Sklandrausis (TSG)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 1.                           

3

OJ C 349, 15.11.2012, p. 23.
# Council Decision 2014/153/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/153/CFSP of 20 March 2014 amending Decision 2011/172/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against            certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/153/CFSP                     

# of 20 March 2014

# amending Decision 2011/172/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view                        of the situation in Egypt                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/172/CFSP(1).

(2)On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/172/CFSP, the restrictive measures contained in that Decision should be renewed                              until 22 March 2015.

(3)Decision 2011/172/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

In Article 5 of Decision 2011/172/CFSP, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:

‘This Decision shall apply until 22 March 2015.’                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 20 March 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

D. Kourkoulas                            

1

Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities                              and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63).
IN RE R.J.N.

No. COA06-715.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 6, 2007.

Certification March 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Catawba (04J260, 04J261).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# L_2013316EN.01004501.xml

| 27.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 316/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 316/45

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 19 November 2013

appointing an Austrian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/684/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Austrian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Gabriele BURGSTALLER, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Gabriele BURGSTALLER,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as alternate member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Ms Brigitta PALLAUF, Landtagspräsidentin Salzburger Landtag. |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Brigitta PALLAUF, Landtagspräsidentin Salzburger Landtag.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 19 November 2013.

For the Council

The President

L. LINKEVIČIUS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                        CLUBCORP STOCK INVESTMENT PLAN


     Amendment  made  this  22nd  day  of  April,  1997,  by  Club Corporation
International  (the  "Company").

                             W I T N E S S E T H:
                             --------------------

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  maintains  the  ClubCorp  Stock  Investment Plan,
effective  January  1,  1995  (the  "Plan");  and

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  now  desires  to  amend  the Plan to provide that
Matching  Contributions  may  also  be  made  in  the  form  of  cash;  and

     WHEREAS,  the  Plan  may  be  amended  by  the  Company  pursuant  to the
provisions  of  Article  XV  of the Plan, and the Company desires to amend the
Plan:

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows, effective as of April 22,
1997:

1.     Existing Section 4.01 is amended by deleting the fourth sentence in its
entirety  and  substituting  the  following  in  its  place:

"All  Matching  Contributions  shall  be made in the form of cash or shares of
Company  Stock."


     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  Amendment has been executed the day and year
first  above  written.

CLUB  CORPORATION  INTERNATIONAL



By:    Terry  A.  Taylor

Its:      Secretary
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick J. Heinig, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[801 NYS2d 670]

Appeal from a judgment of the Herkimer County Court (Patrick L. Kirk, J.), rendered September 30, 2003. The judgment revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of incarceration.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment, entered upon his admission of a violation of probation, revoking the term of probation imposed upon his conviction of welfare fraud in the third degree (Penal Law § 158.15) and sentencing him to a term of incarceration. In appeal No. 2, he appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (§ 220.06 [5]). The record establishes that defendant validly waived his right to appeal with respect to both judgments *(see People v Williams,*15 AD3d 863 [2005]). That waiver encompasses his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution with respect to criminal possession of a controlled substance *(see People v Turner,*16 AD3d 1150 [2005]; *People v Chrispen,*306 AD2d 916 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 619 [2003]) and his contention that County Court exhibited bias against him in suggesting an amendment to the violation of probation petition *(see People v McCafferty,*1 AD3d 799 [2003], *lv denied*2 NY3d 743 [2004]). By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his contentions with respect to the alleged insufficiency of the evidence of his guilt *(see People v Taylor,*65 NY2d 1, 5 [1985]; *People v Hill,*220 AD2d 905, 906 [1995]) and the alleged violation of his due process rights based on the People’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence *(see People v Day,*150 AD2d 595, 600 [1989], *lv denied*74 NY2d 807 [1989]). Although defendant’s jurisdictional challenge to the superior court information in appeal No. 2 survives both the waiver of the right to appeal and the guilty plea *(see People v Sayles,*292 AD2d 641, 643 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 681 [2002]; *see also People v Kohl,*19 AD3d 1155 [2005]), the record fails to support that jurisdictional challenge *(see People v Hunt,*5 AD3d 1021, 1022 [2004]; *People v Chad S.,*237 AD2d 986 [1997], *lv denied*90 NY2d 856 [1997]). The record also fails to support defendant’s contention that the plea agreement was not honored. We reject the contention of defendant that defense counsel’s failure to *1298inquire into the weight of the cocaine seized from him or to seek suppression of the cocaine constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel *(see People v Strempack,*71 NY2d 1015, 1016 [1988]). We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in the pro se supplemental brief, and conclude that none requires reversal. Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
STATE of North Carolina v. Bobby HADDOCK.

No. 292P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Bobby D. Haddock, Jr., Pro Se.

*907Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 2nd day of June 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
Exhibit 32.2

                       InKine Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  InKine  Pharmaceutical
Company,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Robert F. Apple,  Chief  Operating and  Financial  Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.



Date: August 5, 2004                        ROBERT F. APPLE
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Robert F. Apple
                                            Chief Operating and
                                            Financial Officer
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 942/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 942/2013 of 1 October 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for haddock in areas IIIa,            EU waters of Subdivisions 22-32 by vessels flying the flag of the Netherlands         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 942/2013                     

# of 1 October 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for haddock in areas IIIa, EU waters of Subdivisions 22-32 by vessels flying the flag                        of the Netherlands                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 5, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 938]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-172]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

December 28, 2004.
    The Department of Treasury has submitted the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. Copies of 
the submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau 
Clearance Officer listed. Comments regarding this information 
collection should be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the 
Treasury Department Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before February 4, 
2005, to be assured of consideration.

Internal Revenue Service (IRS)

    OMB Number: 1545-1628.
    Regulation Project Number: REG-118620-97 Final.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Title: Communications Excise Tax; Prepaid Telephone Cards.
    Description: Carriers must keep certain information documenting 
their sales of prepaid telephone cards to other carriers to avoid 
responsibility for collecting tax. The regulations provide rules for 
the application of the communications excise tax to prepaid telephone 
cards.
    Respondents: Business or other for-profit.
    Estimated Number of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 104.
    Estimated Burden Hours Respondent/Recordkeeper: 20 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Reporting/Recordkeeping Burden: 34 hours.
    Clearance Officer: Paul H. Finger, (202) 622-3634, Internal Revenue 
Service, Room 6516, 1111 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 
20224.
    OMB Reviewer: Joseph F. Lackey, Jr., (202) 395-7316, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10235, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503.

Lois K. Holland,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-172 Filed 1-4-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kevin P. Knight, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





August
      11, 2008
            By:
            /s/
      Kevin P. KnightKevin
      P. KnightChief
      Executive Officer








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight
Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.





Back to Form
10-Q
Order filed July 10, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-14-00297-CV

____________

IN RE L. CHARLES MONCLA, JR., J. CLARKE LEGLER, II, WILLIAM 

RESTREPO, DANIEL T. LAYTON, LAYTON CORPORATION, 

PLATINUM ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC., AND PLATINUM ENERGY 

SOLUTIONS, INC., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-30972

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On April 21, 2014, relators, L. Charles Moncla, Jr., J. Clarke Legler, II, 

William Restrepo, Daniel T. Layton, Layton Corporation, Platinum Energy 

Holdings, Inc., and Platinum Energy Solutions, Inc., filed a petition for writ of 
2

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221. In the petition, 

relators asked that this court compel The Honorable Wesley Ward, Judge of the 

234th District Court, Harris County, Texas, (1) vacate his March 31, 2014 order 

overruling relators’ special exceptions entered in trial court cause number 

2012-30972, styled Starstream Capital, LLC, et al. v. L. Charles Moncla, Jr., et al.; 

(2) grant the special exceptions; (3) strike real parties in interest’s pleadings; and (4) 

dismiss the case with prejudice. 

On June 2, 2014, relators informed this court that the parties have agreed to 

settle the underlying dispute, subject to the execution of a mutually acceptable 

settlement agreement. We abated the case for thirty days and directed the parties to 

advise the court of the status of the settlement. On July 3, 2014, relators advised 

this court that the parties are still continuing to work towards a settlement 

agreement. 

Therefore, the abatement of this case is continued for an additional thirty 

days, at which time the parties are directed to advise the court of the status of the 

settlement. The original proceeding will be reinstated on this court’s active docket 

when the parties file a motion to dismiss the original proceeding or other dispositive 

motion. The court also will consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the original 

proceeding, or the court may reinstate the original proceeding on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jamison.
EVERHART v. WALGREEN'S.

COA05-1628.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #234937)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.