alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont 

____________________ 

NO. 09-18-00029-CV 

____________________ 

IN THE INTEREST OF J.D.J. and E.M.J. 

________________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 

Montgomery County, Texas 

Trial Cause No. 14-05-05366-CV

________________________________________________________________________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Joshua Jaros, Appellant, filed a notice of appeal with the trial court on 

December 20, 2017. Despite written notices from this Court and an opportunity to 

cure, to date, Appellant has neither established indigence nor paid the filing fee for 

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 20.1. We notified the parties that the appeal would 

be dismissed unless the filing fee was paid. Appellant did not respond to the Court's 

notices. 

Appellant did not file a statement of inability to pay costs and has not shown 

that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1. 
2 

Furthermore, Appellant failed to comply with a notice from the Clerk of the Court 

requiring a response within a specified time. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). There 

being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the appeal, 

we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b), 42.3. 

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

 

 

 ________________________________ 

 CHARLES KREGER 

 Justice 

 

Submitted on April 11, 2018 

Opinion Delivered April 12, 2018 

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1996             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        4,781                   3,789
<SECURITIES>                                 11,418                  11,352
<RECEIVABLES>                                 5,164                   2,946
<ALLOWANCES>                                    265                     280
<INVENTORY>                                     809                     901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             22,241                  19,016
<PP&E>                                        1,236                   1,311
<DEPRECIATION>                                  423                     476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               24,009                  20,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,611                   1,422
<BONDS>                                           0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                       0                       0
<COMMON>                                          7                       7
<OTHER-SE>                                   21,391                  19,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 24,009                  20,891
<SALES>                                      13,605                   1,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             13,605                   1,084
<CGS>                                        12,002                   1,406
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                12,002                   1,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              6,916                   1,827
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                190                      15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              500                     213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (4,813)                 (1,936)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (63)                    (16)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (4,876)                 (1,952)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                       0
<CHANGES>                                         0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (4,876)                 (1,952)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (0.73)                  (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.73)                  (0.26)<FN>
        
<FN>Per share information in 1996 has been retroactively adjusted to reflect a
one for three reverse stock split that was approved in May, 1996.

</TABLE>
STATE v. Luther Ray WILSON, Jr.

No. 217P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Dear Mr. Wilson:

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of April 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for a Writ to Appeal Barred Procedurally":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2006."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ira Smith, Also Known as Dante, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 226]

Appeal from a judgment of the Wayne County Court (John B. Nesbitt, J.), rendered March 2, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree and gang assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court abused its discretion in denying his application for youthful offender status *(see People v Jones,*288 AD2d 397 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 730 [2002]; *People v Gonzalez*[appeal No. 1], 280 AD2d 980 [2001]). In any event, we conclude that defendant’s contention lacks merit *(see People v Henderson,*300 AD2d 1119 [2002], *lv denied*100 NY2d 539 [2003]; *People v Smith,*286 AD2d 878 [2001], *lv denied*98 NY2d 641 [2002]). We further conclude that the court properly set forth on the record its determination that defendant should not be afforded youthful offender status *(see*CPL 720.20 [1]) as well as its reasons for that determination *(see People v DePugh,*16 AD3d 1083, 1084 [2005]; *cf. People v Martinez,*301 AD2d 615, 616 [2003], *lv denied*99 NY2d 656 [2003]). Finally, even assuming, arguendo, that the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing survives his guilty plea *(see People v Widrick,*9 AD3d 897 [2004]; *People v*
      *1343
      *Sheppard,*306 AD2d 841 [2003]), we conclude that defendant received meaningful representation *(see People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Gorski, Martoche, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
Letter
Agreement


 


June
30, 2016


Mr.
Michael J. Hanson


c/o
18671 Lake Drive E.


Southwest
Tech Center A


Minneapolis,
MN 55317


 


RE:Amendment
#3 to Borrowing Arrangement


 


Dear
Mike,


 


This
letter confirms our agreement as follows:


 


Michael
J. Hanson hereby agrees to amend the final sentence of paragraph (a) of the “BORROWING AND REPAYMENT” section of the
LOC Note to read as follows: “Cachet Financial Solutions, Inc. agrees to make interest only payments on January 31, 2017.
The interest only payment is for interest that accrues on the principal balance from February 1, 2016 to date of payment. The
outstanding principal and accrued interest balance of the Note shall be due and payable in full on January 31, 2017 (“Maturity
Date”).”


 


If
you are in agreement with the foregoing, please indicate as much by signing in the appropriate space below.


 


	CACHET FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	By:
    	/s/
    Bryan Meier	 
	 	Bryan
    Meier / CFO	 


 


	 	AGREED
    AND ACCEPTED
	 	 
	 	/s/
    Michael J. Hanson
	 	Michael
    J. Hanson
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Dale RIDLEY.

No. 272PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 28, 2007.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Scott Thomas, District Attorney, for State of NC.

John T. Hall, Raleigh, for Christopher Dale Ridley.

*ORDER*

The State's petition for discretionary review filed 18 May 2006 is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding the matter to the North Carolina Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of *State v. Blackwell,* 361 N.C. 41, 638 S.E.2d 452 (2006) and *State v. Hurt,* 361 N.C. 325, 643 S.E.2d 915 (2007).

By order of the Court in Conference, this 27th day of June, 2007.
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 32(b)

  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
     As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, James M. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of Solutia Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal
                  year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
                  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 6, 2007

                                                /s/ James M. Sullivan
                                                ---------------------
                                                James M. Sullivan
                                                Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc. and will
be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
                                                                                
                                        
                               WEEKS REALTY, L.P.

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON UNIT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  Three Months    Three Months    Nine Months     Nine Months
                                                      Ended          Ended           Ended           Ended
      (In thousands, except per unit data)        Sept. 30,1997  Sept. 30, 1996  Sept. 30, 1997  Sept. 30, 1996
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>
Weighted average number of common
  units outstanding                                      22,834          13,742          20,816          13,729
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options
  (determined under the Treasury Stock Method)               --              --              --              --
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted average number of common
  and common equivalent units outstanding                22,834          13,742          20,816          13,729
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income                                              $ 7,451         $ 3,731         $19,206         $11,350
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Per share data:
  Net income per common unit                            $  0.33         $  0.27         $  0.92         $  0.83
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>

                                       1
IN RE A.H.

No. COA07-301.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (04J320).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,076
<SECURITIES>                                    13,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,473
<PP&E>                                         717,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               (154,951)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 239,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          601,303
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    150,000
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (542,779)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   239,084
<SALES>                                        104,722
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,722
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  203,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (170,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (170,193)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (170,193)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE
ELEVEN MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001043236
<NAME> ELDER TRUST
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,206
<PP&E>                                         180,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 271,317
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           95,804
<BONDS>                                         20,576
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                     113,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   271,317
<SALES>                                         21,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,233
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   921
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,256
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,973
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,973
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
        









</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1401/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1401/2013 of 18 December 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Yorkshire Wensleydale (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1401/2013                     

# of 18 December 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Yorkshire Wensleydale                        (PGI)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Yorkshire                              Wensleydale’ was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Yorkshire Wensleydale’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.3.****Cheeses**U.K.

#### UNITED KINGDOMU.K.

Yorkshire Wensleydale (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 231, 9.8.2013, p. 20.
<PAGE>
 
                                 Exhibit 10.6

     Mr. Puorro's Employment Agreement is the same as the Employment Agreement
in Exhibit 10.2, which is incorporated herein by reference except as to: (i) the
name of the signatory, which is Michael P. Puorro; (ii) the position in Section
1, which is Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer; (iii) the
signatory for the Company, which is Joseph L. Mancino; (iv) the guarantor for
the Company, which is Joseph L. Mancino; and (v) the amount of the base salary
in Section 3(a), which is $197,000.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3435 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3435

 To allow certain participants in the conservation reserve program to 
   participate in the critical feed use program of the Secretary of 
                              Agriculture.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2008

   Mr. Dorgan (for himself, Mr. Baucus, Mr. Tester, and Mr. Conrad) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow certain participants in the conservation reserve program to 
   participate in the critical feed use program of the Secretary of 
                              Agriculture.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Critical Feed Use Fairness Act of 
2008''.

SEC. 2. CRITICAL FEED USE PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN CONSERVATION RESERVE 
              PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Conservation reserve program.--The term ``conservation 
        reserve program'' means the conservation reserve program 
        established under subchapter B of chapter 1 of subtitle D of 
        title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3831 et 
        seq.).
            (2) Critical feed use program.--The term ``critical feed 
        use program'' means the program described in the notice 
        entitled ``Notice of Voluntary Modification of Conservation 
        Reserve Program Contract'' (73 Fed. Reg. 31053), dated May 30, 
        2008.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture.
    (b) Authority.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, if an 
owner or operator of land enrolled in the conservation reserve program 
submits to the Secretary an affidavit stating that the owner or 
operator attempted or intended to enroll in the critical feed use 
program prior to July 8, 2008, the Secretary shall modify the 
conservation reserve program contract of the owner or operator to allow 
critical feed use (including haying or grazing) of the enrolled land in 
accordance with the terms and conditions of the critical feed use 
program.
                                 <all>
```