# L_2013020EN.01003301.xml

| 23.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 20/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 20/33

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 51/2013

of 16 January 2013

amending Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 as regards the methods of analysis for the determination of constituents of animal origin for the official control of feed

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules (1), and in particular Article 11(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (2) provides that the feeding to ruminants of protein derived from animals is prohibited. That prohibition is extended to animals other than ruminants and restricted, as regards the feeding of those animals with products of animal origin, in accordance with Annex IV to that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (2) provides that the feeding to ruminants of protein derived from animals is prohibited. That prohibition is extended to animals other than ruminants and restricted, as regards the feeding of those animals with products of animal origin, in accordance with Annex IV to that Regulation.

| (2) | Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (3) prohibits the feeding of terrestrial animals of a given species other than fur animals with processed animal protein derived from the bodies or parts of bodies of animals of the same species, as well as the feeding of farmed fish with processed animal protein derived from the bodies or parts of bodies of farmed fish of the same species. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (3) prohibits the feeding of terrestrial animals of a given species other than fur animals with processed animal protein derived from the bodies or parts of bodies of animals of the same species, as well as the feeding of farmed fish with processed animal protein derived from the bodies or parts of bodies of farmed fish of the same species.

| (3) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed (4) sets out in its Annex VI the methods of analysis for the determination of constituents of animal origin for the official control of feed. The microscopic method, which is currently the only method validated to detect the presence of animal proteins in feed, is able to distinguish the presence of constituents derived from terrestrial animals from the presence of constituents derived from fish, but unable to quantify with a sufficient level of accuracy the amount of animal constituents present in feed, and therefore should not be used for this purpose. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed (4) sets out in its Annex VI the methods of analysis for the determination of constituents of animal origin for the official control of feed. The microscopic method, which is currently the only method validated to detect the presence of animal proteins in feed, is able to distinguish the presence of constituents derived from terrestrial animals from the presence of constituents derived from fish, but unable to quantify with a sufficient level of accuracy the amount of animal constituents present in feed, and therefore should not be used for this purpose.

| (4) | A new method of detection of animal constituents based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was validated by the EU reference laboratory for animal proteins in feedingstuffs. An implementation study, organised with the national reference laboratories of the Member States, proved that the new method is sufficiently robust to be used as an official control method in the Union. This new method is able to detect the presence of animal constituents in feed, and also able to identify the species origin of these constituents. The use of this new method in combination with or in replacement of, as appropriate, the microscopic method would be very valuable for the control of the correct implementation of the feeding prohibitions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 999/2001 and (EC) No 1069/2009. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

A new method of detection of animal constituents based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was validated by the EU reference laboratory for animal proteins in feedingstuffs. An implementation study, organised with the national reference laboratories of the Member States, proved that the new method is sufficiently robust to be used as an official control method in the Union. This new method is able to detect the presence of animal constituents in feed, and also able to identify the species origin of these constituents. The use of this new method in combination with or in replacement of, as appropriate, the microscopic method would be very valuable for the control of the correct implementation of the feeding prohibitions laid down in Regulations (EC) No 999/2001 and (EC) No 1069/2009.

| (5) | Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 should therefore be replaced accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 should therefore be replaced accordingly.

| (6) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and neither the European Parliament nor the Council have opposed them, |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health and neither the European Parliament nor the Council have opposed them,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 January 2013.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 165, 30.4.2004, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 147, 31.5.2001, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 1.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 54, 26.2.2009, p. 1.

4

---

ANNEX

‘ANNEX VI

METHODS OF ANALYSIS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF CONSTITUENTS OF ANIMAL ORIGIN FOR THE OFFICIAL CONTROL OF FEED

1.   PURPOSE AND SCOPE

The determination of constituents of animal origin in feed shall be performed by light microscopy or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in accordance with the provisions laid down in this Annex.

These two methods make it possible to detect the presence of constituents of animal origin in feed materials and compound feed. However, they do not make it possible to calculate the amount of such constituents in feed materials and compound feed. Both methods have a limit of detection below 0,1 % (w/w).

The PCR method makes it possible to identify the taxonomic group of constituents of animal origin present in feed materials and compound feed.

These methods shall apply for the control of the application of the prohibitions laid down in Article 7(1) and Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 and in Article 11(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009.

Depending on the type of feed being tested, these methods may be used, within one single operational protocol, either on their own or combined together in accordance with the standard operating procedures (SOP) established by the EU reference laboratory for animal proteins in feedingstuffs (EURL-AP) and published on its website (1).

2.   METHODS

2.1.   Light microscopy

2.1.1.   Principle

The constituents of animal origin which may be present in feed materials and compound feed sent for analysis are identified on the basis of typical and microscopically identifiable characteristics like muscle fibres and other meat particles, cartilage, bones, horn, hair, bristles, blood, feathers, egg shells, fish bones and scales.

2.1.2.   Reagents and equipment

2.1.2.1.   Reagents

2.1.2.1.1.   Concentrating agent

2.1.2.1.1.1.   Tetrachloroethylene (specific gravity 1,62)

2.1.2.1.2.   Staining reagent

2.1.2.1.2.1.   Alizarin Red solution (dilute 2,5 ml 1M hydrochloric acid in 100 ml water and add 200 mg Alizarin Red to this solution)

2.1.2.1.3.   Mounting media

2.1.2.1.3.1.   Lye (NaOH 2,5 % w/v or KOH 2,5 % w/v)

2.1.2.1.3.2.   Glycerol (undiluted, viscosity: 1 490 cP)

2.1.2.1.3.3.   Norland ® Optical Adhesive 65 (viscosity: 1 200 cP) or a resin with equivalent properties for permanent slide preparation

2.1.2.1.4.   Mounting media with staining properties

2.1.2.1.4.1.   Lugol solution (dissolve 2 g potassium iodide in 100 ml water and add 1 g iodine while frequently shaking)

2.1.2.1.4.2.   Cystine reagent (2 g lead acetate, 10 g NaOH/100 ml water)

2.1.2.1.4.3.   Fehling’s reagent (prepared before use from equals parts (1/1) of two stock solutions A and B. Solution A: dissolve 6,9 g copper (II) sulphate pentahydrate in 100 ml water. Solution B: dissolve 34,6 g potassium sodium tartrate tetrahydrate and 12 g NaOH in 100 ml water)

2.1.2.1.4.4.   Tetramethylbenzidine/Hydrogen peroxide. (dissolve 1 g 3,3’,5,5’ tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) in 100 ml glacial acetic acid and 150 ml water. Before use, mix 4 parts of this TMB solution with 1 part 3 % hydrogen peroxide)

2.1.2.1.5.   Rinsing agents

2.1.2.1.5.1.   Ethanol ≥ 96 % (technical grade)

2.1.2.1.5.2.   Acetone (technical grade)

2.1.2.1.6.   Bleaching reagent

2.1.2.1.6.1.   Commercial sodium hypochlorite solution (9 - 14 % active chlorine)

2.1.2.2.   Equipment

2.1.2.2.1.   Analytical balance with an accuracy of 0,001 g

2.1.2.2.2.   Grinding equipment: mill - or mortar

2.1.2.2.3.   Sieves with square meshes of 0,25 mm and 1 mm width

2.1.2.2.4.   Conical glass separation funnel with a content of 250 ml with Teflon or ground glass stopcock at the base of the cone. Stopcock opening diameter shall be ≥ 4mm. Alternatively, a conical bottomed settling beaker may be used provided the laboratory has demonstrated that detection levels are equivalent to that obtained using the conical glass separation funnel.

Separation funnel

Image 1

2.1.2.2.5.   Stereomicroscope covering at least a 6,5× to 40× final magnification range

2.1.2.2.6.   Compound microscope covering at least a 100× to 400× final magnification range with transmitted light bright field. Polarised light and differential interferential contrast can additionally be used

2.1.2.2.7.   Standard laboratory glassware

2.1.2.2.8.   Equipment for slide preparation: classical microscope slides, hollow slides, coverslips (20 × 20 mm), tweezers, fine spatula

2.1.3.   Sampling and sample preparation

2.1.3.1.   Sampling

A representative sample, taken in accordance with the provisions laid down in Annex I shall be used.

2.1.3.2.   Precautions to be taken

In order to avoid laboratory cross-contamination, all reusable equipment shall be carefully cleaned before use. Separation funnel pieces shall be disassembled before cleaning. Separation funnel pieces and glassware shall be pre-washed manually and then washed in a washing machine. Sieves shall be cleaned by using a brush with stiff synthetic hairs. A final cleaning of sieves with acetone and compressed air is recommended after sieving of fatty material like fishmeal.

2.1.3.3.   Preparation of samples other than fat or oil

2.1.3.3.1.   
  Sample drying: samples with a moisture content > 14 % shall be dried prior to handling.

2.1.3.3.2.   
  Sample pre-sieving: it is recommended to pre-sieve at 1 mm pelleted feeds and kernels and to subsequently prepare and analyse the two resulting fractions as distinct samples.

2.1.3.3.3.   
  Sub-sampling and grinding: at least 50 g of the sample shall be sub-sampled for analysis and subsequently ground.

2.1.3.3.4.   
  Extraction and preparation of the sediment: a portion of 10 g (accurate to 0,01 g) of the ground sub-sample shall be transferred into the separation funnel or conical bottomed settling beaker and 50 ml of tetrachloroethylene shall be added. The portion transferred into the funnel shall be limited to 3 g in case of fishmeal or other pure animal products, mineral ingredients or premixes which generate more than 10 % of sediment. The mixture shall be vigorously shaken for at least 30 s and at least 50 ml more of tetrachloroethylene shall be added cautiously while washing down the inside surface of the funnel to remove any adhering particles. The resulting mixture shall be left to stand for at least 5 minutes before the sediment is separated off by opening the stopcock.

If a conical bottomed settling beaker is used then the mixture shall be vigorously stirred for at least 15 s and any particles adhering to the side of the beaker shall be carefully washed down the inside surface with at least 10 ml of clean tetrachloroethylene. The mixture shall be left to stand for 3 minutes and then stirred again for 15 seconds and any particles adhering to the side of the beaker shall be carefully washed down the inside surface with at least 10 ml of clean tetrachloroethylene. The resulting mixture shall be left to stand for at least 5 minutes and then the liquid fraction is removed and discarded by careful decanting, taking care not to lose any of the sediment.

The sediment shall be dried and subsequently weighed (accurate to 0,001 g). If more than 5 % of the sediment consists of particles > 0,50 mm, it shall be sieved at 0,25 mm and the two resulting fractions shall be examined.

2.1.3.3.5.   
  Extraction and preparation of the flotate: after recovery of the sediment with the method described above, two phases should remain in the separation funnel: a liquid one consisting of tetrachloroethylene and a solid one made of floating material. This solid phase is the flotate and shall be recovered by pouring off completely tetrachloroethylene from the funnel by opening the stopcock. By inverting the separation funnel, the flotate shall be transferred into a large Petri dish and air dried in a fumehood. If more than 5 % of the flotate consists of particles > 0,50 mm, it shall be sieved at 0,25 mm and the two resulting fractions shall be examined.

2.1.3.3.6.   
  Preparation of raw material: a portion of at least 5 g of the ground sub-sample shall be prepared. If more than 5 % of the material consists of particles > 0,50 mm, it shall be sieved at 0,25 mm and the two resulting fractions shall be examined.

2.1.3.4.   Preparation of samples consisting of fat or oil

The following protocol shall be followed for the preparation of samples consisting of fat or oil:

| — | if the fat is solid, it shall be warmed in a oven until it is liquid. |
| --- | --- |

—

if the fat is solid, it shall be warmed in a oven until it is liquid.

| — | by using a pipette, 40 ml of fat or oil shall be transferred from the bottom of the sample to a centrifugation tube. |
| --- | --- |

—

by using a pipette, 40 ml of fat or oil shall be transferred from the bottom of the sample to a centrifugation tube.

| — | centrifuge during 10 minutes at 4 000 r.p.m. |
| --- | --- |

—

centrifuge during 10 minutes at 4 000 r.p.m.

| — | if the fat is solid after centrifugation, it shall be warmed in an oven until it is liquid. |
| --- | --- |

—

if the fat is solid after centrifugation, it shall be warmed in an oven until it is liquid.

| — | repeat the centrifugation during 5 minutes at 4 000 r.p.m. |
| --- | --- |

—

repeat the centrifugation during 5 minutes at 4 000 r.p.m.

| — | by using a small spoon or a spatula, one half of the decanted impurities shall be transferred to microscopic slides for examination, Glycerol is recommended as mounting medium. |
| --- | --- |

—

by using a small spoon or a spatula, one half of the decanted impurities shall be transferred to microscopic slides for examination, Glycerol is recommended as mounting medium.

| — | the remaining impurities shall be used for preparing the sediment as described in point 2.1.3.3. |
| --- | --- |

—

the remaining impurities shall be used for preparing the sediment as described in point 2.1.3.3.

2.1.3.5.   Use of staining reagents

In order to facilitate the correct identification of the constituents of animal origin, the operator may use staining reagents during the sample preparation in accordance with guidelines issued by the EURL-AP and published on its website.

In case Alizarin Red solution is used to colour the sediment, the following protocol shall apply:

| — | the dried sediment shall be transferred into a glass test tube and rinsed twice with approximately 5 ml of ethanol (each time a vortex of 30 s shall be used, the solvent shall be let settle about 1 min 30 s and poured off). |
| --- | --- |

—

the dried sediment shall be transferred into a glass test tube and rinsed twice with approximately 5 ml of ethanol (each time a vortex of 30 s shall be used, the solvent shall be let settle about 1 min 30 s and poured off).

| — | the sediment shall be bleached by adding at least 1 ml sodium hypochlorite solution. The reaction shall be allowed to continue for 10 min. The tube shall be filled with water, the sediment shall be let settle 2-3 min, and the water and the suspended particles shall be poured off gently. |
| --- | --- |

—

the sediment shall be bleached by adding at least 1 ml sodium hypochlorite solution. The reaction shall be allowed to continue for 10 min. The tube shall be filled with water, the sediment shall be let settle 2-3 min, and the water and the suspended particles shall be poured off gently.

| — | the sediment shall be rinsed twice more with about 10 ml of water (a vortex shall be used for 30 s, let settle, and pour off the water each time). |
| --- | --- |

—

the sediment shall be rinsed twice more with about 10 ml of water (a vortex shall be used for 30 s, let settle, and pour off the water each time).

| — | 2 to 10 drops of the Alizarin Red solution shall be added and the mixture shall be vortexed. The reaction shall be let occur for 30 s and the coloured sediment shall be rinsed twice with approximately 5 ml ethanol followed by one rinse with acetone (each time a vortex of 30 s shall be used, the solvent shall be let settle about 1 min and poured off). |
| --- | --- |

—

2 to 10 drops of the Alizarin Red solution shall be added and the mixture shall be vortexed. The reaction shall be let occur for 30 s and the coloured sediment shall be rinsed twice with approximately 5 ml ethanol followed by one rinse with acetone (each time a vortex of 30 s shall be used, the solvent shall be let settle about 1 min and poured off).

| — | the coloured sediment shall be dried. |
| --- | --- |

—

the coloured sediment shall be dried.

2.1.4.   Microscopic examination

2.1.4.1.   Slide preparation

Microscopic slides shall be prepared from the sediment and, depending of operator’s choice, from either the flotate or the raw material. In case sieving has been used during the sample preparation, the two resulting fractions (the fine and the coarse one) shall be prepared. Test portions of fractions spread on slides shall be representative of the whole fraction.

A sufficient number of slides shall be prepared in order to ensure that a complete examination protocol as laid down in point 2.1.4.2 can be carried-out.

Microscopic slides shall be mounted with the adequate mounting medium in accordance with the SOP established by the EURL-AP and published on its website. The slides shall be covered with coverslips.

2.1.4.2.   Observation protocols for the detection of animal particles in compound feed and feed material

The prepared microscopic slides shall be observed in accordance with the observation protocols laid down in diagram 1 for compound feed and feed materials other than pure fishmeal, or in diagram 2 for pure fishmeal.

The microscopic observations shall be conducted using the compound microscope on the sediment and, depending of the operator’s choice, either on the flotate or on the raw material. The stereomicroscope may be used in addition to the compound microscope for the coarse fractions. Each slide shall be screened entirely at various magnifications.

The minimum numbers of slides to be observed at each step of the observation protocol shall be strictly respected unless the entire fraction material does not permit to reach the stipulated slide number. No more than 6 slides per determination shall be observed.

In order to facilitate the identification of the particles’ nature and origin, the operator may use support tools like decision support systems, image libraries and reference samples.

Diagram 1

Observation protocol for the detection of animal particles in compound feed and feed material other than fishmeal

YES

Grinding process of sample insures 95 % of particles ≤ 0.50 mm

NO

Sieving on 0.25 mm mesh

3 slides from sediment + 1 slide from flotate or raw material

3 slides from < 0.25 mm sediment + 1 slide < 0.25 mm flotate or raw material

> 5 animal particles of same nature detected?

YES

sample declared according to point 2.1.5.3 for FISH

repetition of analysis according to point 2.1.4.3

YES

> 5 animal particles of same nature detected?

NO

> 5

Number of fish particles?

≤ 5

NO

1 slide from sediment

FISH

1 slide from > 0.25 mm sediment

> 5 animal particles of same nature detected?

YES

nature of animal particles?

YES

> 5 animal particles of same nature detected?

NO

TERRESTRIAL

NO

1 slide from rotate or raw material

> 5

Number of terrestrial particles?

≤ 5

1 slide from > 0.25 mm flotate or raw material

animal particles detected?

YES

sample declared according to point 2.1.5.3 for TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL

repetition of analysis according to point 2.1.4.3

YES

animal particles detected?

NO

sample declared according to point 2.1.5.1

NO

Diagram 2

Observation protocol for the detection of animal particles in fishmeal

YES

Grinding process insures 95% of particles ≤ 0.50 mm

NO

Sieving on 0.25 mm mesh

3 slides from sediment

3 slides from < 0.25 mm sediment

> 5 terrestrial particles detected?

YES

YES

> 5 terrestrial particles detected?

NO

sample declared according to point 2.1.5.3 for TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL

NO

2 slides from sediment

> 5

2 slides from > 0.25 mm sediment

> 5 terrestrial particles detected?

YES

Number of terrestrial particles?

YES

> 5 terrestrial particles detected?

NO

≤ 5

NO

1 slide from flotate or raw material

repetition of analysis according to point 2.1.4.3

1 slide from < 0.25 mm flotate or raw material

terrestrial particles detected?

YES

YES

terrestrial particles detected?

NO

sample declared according to point 2.1.5.1 for TERRESTRIAL ANIMAL

NO

2.1.4.3.   Number of determinations

If following a first determination carried out in accordance with the observation protocol laid down in diagram 1 or diagram 2 as relevant, no animal particle of a given nature (i.e. terrestrial animal or fish) is detected, no additional determination is necessary and the result of the analysis shall be reported using the terminology laid down in point 2.1.5.1.

If, following a first determination carried out in accordance with the observation protocols laid down in diagram 1 or in diagram 2 as relevant, the total number of animal particles of a given nature (i.e. terrestrial animal or fish) detected ranges from 1 to 5, a second determination shall be performed from a new 50 g sub-sample. If, following this second determination, the number of animal particles of this given nature detected ranges from 0 to 5, the result of the analysis shall be reported using the terminology laid down in point 2.1.5.2., else a third determination shall be carried out from a new 50 g sub-sample. Nevertheless, if following the first and the second determination, the sum of the particles of a given nature detected over the two determinations is higher than 15, no additional determination is necessary and the result of the analysis shall be directly reported using the terminology laid down in point 2.1.5.3. If, following the third determination, the sum of the animal particles of a given nature detected over the three determinations is higher than 15, the result of the analysis shall be reported using the terminology laid down in point 2.1.5.3. Otherwise, the result of the analysis shall be reported using the terminology laid down in point 2.1.5.2.

If following a first determination carried out in accordance with the observation protocols laid down in diagram 1 or in diagram 2 as relevant, more than 5 animal particles of a given nature (i.e. terrestrial animal or fish) are detected, the result of the analysis shall be reported using the terminology laid down in point 2.1.5.3.

2.1.5.   Expression of the results

When reporting the results, the laboratory shall indicate on which type of material the analysis has been carried-out (sediment, flotate or raw material) and how many determinations have been carried-out.

The laboratory report shall at least contain information on the presence of constituents derived from terrestrial animals and from fish.

The different situations shall be reported in the following ways.

2.1.5.1.   No animal particle of a given nature detected:

| — | as far as was discernible using a light microscope, no particle derived from terrestrial animals was detected in the submitted sample, |
| --- | --- |

—

as far as was discernible using a light microscope, no particle derived from terrestrial animals was detected in the submitted sample,

| — | as far as was discernible using a light microscope, no particle derived from fish was detected in the submitted sample. |
| --- | --- |

—

as far as was discernible using a light microscope, no particle derived from fish was detected in the submitted sample.

2.1.5.2.   Between 1 and 5 animal particles of a given nature detected on average:

| — | as far as was discernible using a light microscope, no more than 5 particles derived from terrestrial animals were detected on average per determination in the submitted sample. The particles were identified as ... [bone, cartilage, muscle, hair, horn...]. This low level presence, being below the limit of detection of the microscopic method, means that a risk of false positive result cannot be excluded. |
| --- | --- |

—

as far as was discernible using a light microscope, no more than 5 particles derived from terrestrial animals were detected on average per determination in the submitted sample. The particles were identified as ... [bone, cartilage, muscle, hair, horn...]. This low level presence, being below the limit of detection of the microscopic method, means that a risk of false positive result cannot be excluded.

Or, as relevant,

| — | as far as was discernible using a light microscope, no more than 5 particles derived from fish were detected on average per determination in the submitted sample. The particles were identified as ... [fishbone, fish scale, cartilage, muscle, otolith, gill...]. This low level presence, being below the limit of detection of the microscopic method, means that a risk of false positive result cannot be excluded. |
| --- | --- |

—

as far as was discernible using a light microscope, no more than 5 particles derived from fish were detected on average per determination in the submitted sample. The particles were identified as ... [fishbone, fish scale, cartilage, muscle, otolith, gill...]. This low level presence, being below the limit of detection of the microscopic method, means that a risk of false positive result cannot be excluded.

In case of sample pre-sieving, the laboratory report shall mention in which fraction (sieved fraction, pelleted fraction or kernels) the animal particles have been detected insofar as the detection of animal particles only in the sieved fraction may be the sign of an environmental contamination.

2.1.5.3.   More than 5 animal particles of a given nature detected on average

| — | as far as was discernible using a light microscope, more than 5 particles derived from terrestrial animals were detected on average per determination in the submitted sample. The particles were identified as ... [bone, cartilage, muscle, hair, horn...]. |
| --- | --- |

—

as far as was discernible using a light microscope, more than 5 particles derived from terrestrial animals were detected on average per determination in the submitted sample. The particles were identified as ... [bone, cartilage, muscle, hair, horn...].

Or, as relevant,

| — | as far as was discernible using a light microscope, more than 5 particles derived from fish were detected on average per determination in the submitted sample. The particles were identified as ... [fishbone, fish scale, cartilage, muscle, otolith, gill...]. |
| --- | --- |

—

as far as was discernible using a light microscope, more than 5 particles derived from fish were detected on average per determination in the submitted sample. The particles were identified as ... [fishbone, fish scale, cartilage, muscle, otolith, gill...].

In case of sample pre-sieving, the laboratory report shall mention in which fraction (sieved fraction, pelleted fraction or kernels) the animal particles have been detected insofar as the detection of animal particles only in the sieved fraction may be the sign of an environmental contamination.

2.2.   PCR

2.2.1.   Principle

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) fragments of animal origin which may be present in feed materials and compound feed are detected by a genetic amplification technique through PCR, targeting species-specific DNA sequences.

The PCR method first requires a DNA extraction step. The amplification step shall be applied afterwards to the so-obtained DNA extract, in order to detect the animal species targeted by the assay.

2.2.2.   Reagents and equipment

2.2.2.1.   Reagents

2.2.2.1.1.   Reagents for DNA extraction step

Only reagents approved by the EURL-AP and published on its website shall be used.

2.2.2.1.2.   Reagents for genetic amplification step

2.2.2.1.2.1.   Primers and probes

Only primers and probes with sequences of oligonucleotides validated by the EURL-AP shall be used (2).

2.2.2.1.2.2.   Master Mix

Only Master Mix solutions which do not contain reagents susceptible to lead to false results due to presence of animal DNA shall be used (3).

2.2.2.1.2.3.   Decontamination reagents

2.2.2.1.2.3.1.   Hydrochloric acid solution (0,1 N)

2.2.2.1.2.3.2.   Bleach (solution of sodium hypochlorite at 0,15 % of active chlorine)

2.2.2.1.2.3.3.   Non-corrosive reagents for decontaminating costly devices like analytical balances (e.g. DNA EraseTM of MP Biomedicals)

2.2.2.2.   Equipment

2.2.2.2.1.   Analytical balance with an accuracy of 0,001 g

2.2.2.2.2.   Grinding equipment

2.2.2.2.3.   Thermocycler enabling real-time PCR

2.2.2.2.4.   Microcentrifuge for microfuge tubes

2.2.2.2.5.   Set of micropipettes allowing to pipet from 1 μl up to 1 000 μl

2.2.2.2.6.   Standard molecular biology plastic-ware: microfuge tubes, filtered plastic tips for micropipettes, plates suitable for the thermocycler.

2.2.2.2.7.   Freezers to store samples and reagents

2.2.3.   Sampling and sample preparation

2.2.3.1.   Sampling

A representative sample, taken in accordance with the provisions laid down in Annex I, shall be used.

2.2.3.2.   Sample preparation

The preparation of laboratory samples up to DNA extraction shall comply with the requirements set out in Annex II. At least 50 g of the sample shall be sub-sampled for analysis and subsequently ground.

The sample preparation shall be performed in a room different from the ones dedicated to DNA extraction and to genetic amplification reactions as described by ISO 24276.

Two test portions of at least 100 mg each shall be prepared.

2.2.4.   DNA extraction

The DNA extraction shall be performed on each test portion prepared using the SOP established by the EURL-AP and published on its website.

Two extraction controls shall be prepared for each extraction series as described by ISO 24276.

| — | an extraction blank control, |
| --- | --- |

—

an extraction blank control,

| — | a positive DNA extraction control. |
| --- | --- |

—

a positive DNA extraction control.

2.2.5.   Genetic amplification

The genetic amplification shall be performed using the methods validated for each species requiring identification. These methods are laid down in the SOP established by the EURL-AP and published on its website. Each DNA extract shall be analysed at least at two different dilutions in order to evaluate inhibition.

Two amplification controls shall be prepared per species target as described by ISO 24276.

| — | a positive DNA target control shall be used for each plate or series of PCR assays, |
| --- | --- |

—

a positive DNA target control shall be used for each plate or series of PCR assays,

| — | an amplification reagent control (also called no template control) shall be used for each plate or series of PCR assays. |
| --- | --- |

—

an amplification reagent control (also called no template control) shall be used for each plate or series of PCR assays.

2.2.6.   Interpretation and expression of results

When reporting the results, the laboratory shall indicate at least the weight of the test portions used, the extraction technique used, the number of determinations carried-out and the limit of detection of the method.

Results shall not be interpreted and reported if the positive DNA extraction control and the positive DNA target controls do not provide positive results for the target under assay while the amplification reagent control is negative.

In case results from the two test portions are not consistent, at least the genetic amplification step shall be repeated. If the laboratory suspects that the DNA extracts can be the cause of the inconsistency, a new DNA extraction and a subsequent genetic amplification shall be performed before interpreting the results.

The final expression of the results shall be based on the integration and the interpretation of the results of the two test portions in accordance with the SOP established by the EURL-AP and published on its website.

2.2.6.1.   Negative result

A negative result shall be reported as follows:

No DNA from X was detected in the submitted sample (with X being the animal species or group of animal species that is targeted by the assay).

2.2.6.2.   Positive result

A positive result shall be reported as follows:

DNA from X was detected in the submitted sample (with X being the animal species or group of animal species that is targeted by the assay).’

---

(1)  http://eurl.craw.eu/

1

(2)  The list of these primers and probes for each animal species targeted by the assay is available on the EURL-AP website.

2

(3)  Examples of Master Mixes that are functional are available on the EURL-AP website.

3

---