alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3113 

To reinstate the Interim Management Strategy governing off-road vehicle 

use in the Cape Hatteras National Seashore, North Carolina, pending 

the issuance of a final rule for off-road vehicle use by the National 

Park Service. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2008 

Mrs. DOLE (for herself and Mr. BURR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To reinstate the Interim Management Strategy governing 

off-road vehicle use in the Cape Hatteras National Seashore, North Carolina, pending the issuance of a final 

rule for off-road vehicle use by the National Park Service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CAPE HATTERAS NATIONAL SEASHORE, NORTH 

4 CAROLINA. 

5 (a) REINSTATEMENT OF INTERIM MANAGEMENT

6 STRATEGY.—During the period beginning on the date of 

7 enactment of this Act and ending on the date on which 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3113 IS

1 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Director 

2 of the National Park Service, issues a special regulation 

3 and long-term off-road vehicle management plan for the 

4 use of Cape Hatteras National Seashore, North Carolina 

5 (referred to in this section as the ‘‘Seashore’’), the Sea6 shore shall be managed in accordance with the Interim 

7 Protected Species Management Strategy/Environmental 

8 Assessment issued by the National Park Service on June 

9 13, 2007. 

10 (b) INAPPLICABILITY OF CONSENT DECREE.—The 

11 consent decree dated April 30, 2008, and filed in the 

12 United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

13 North Carolina regarding off-road vehicle use at the Sea14 shore shall not apply after the date of enactment of this 

15 Act. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. dollars

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  Sep-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1.000
<CASH>                        3,315
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 3,389
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              6,704
<PP&E>                        1,757,198
<DEPRECIATION>                100,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                1,818,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         21,108
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   11
<COMMON>                      31
<OTHER-SE>                    750,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  1,818,032
<SALES>                       192,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              207,769
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 109,584
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              7,054
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            48,678
<INCOME-PRETAX>               39,369
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           39,369
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               437
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  39,806
<EPS-BASIC>                 0.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0.73




</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 25, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-41002 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN CARLOS VALDIVIA-CARDONA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-396-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Juan Carlos Valdivia-Cardona (Valdivia) appeals his guilty-plea conviction of, and sentence for, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326 by being found in the United States without permission after deportation. He argues, in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), that the 46-month term of imprisonment imposed in his case exceeds the statutory maximum sentence allowed for the § 1326(a) offense charged in his indictment. He challenges the constitutionality of § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions asNo. 05-41002 -2- sentencing factors rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. Valdivia’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although he contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi , we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Valdivia properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
STATE v. FORD.

COA05-1585.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Davidson (03CRS50050).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00163

- CV

IN RE KAVEH BARAKHSH AN AND

HAMID BARAKHSHAN RELATORS

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The court has considered relator s ’ pet ition for writ of mandamus and

temporary relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly,

relator s ’ petition for writ of mandamus and temporary relief is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED: Apri l 2 6 , 2012

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).
Michael Joseph WASHINGTON v. NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS.

No. 644P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Michael J. Washington, pro se.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 27th day of December 2006 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Lenoir County:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in Conference this the 27th day of June 2007."
Miriam GORE, Employee v. MYRTLE/MUELLER, Employer Travelers Insurance Company, Carrier.

No. 396PA006.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Leah L. King, for Miriam Gore.

Dana C. Moody, Thomas M. Morrow, Raleigh, for Myrtle/Mueller, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 11th day of August 2006 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."

Defendants shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
STATE of North Carolina v. Jerome PHELPS.

No. 566P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Jerome Phelps, Jr., Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 30th day of October 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."
STATE v. COAD

No. COA06-864.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (02CRS62819).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 31.1




PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
CERTIFICATION




I, Bradley S. Powell, President and Chief Financial Officer of
Eden Bioscience Corporation, certify that:




1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of Eden Bioscience Corporation;




2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;




b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  I have disclosed, based on my most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors:




a)  all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.




Date: August 10, 2007


| |  |  |  | /s/ Bradley S. Powell Bradley S. Powell President and Chief Financial Officer
| |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
# L_2013077EN.01001801.xml

| 20.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 77/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 77/18

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 250/2013

of 19 March 2013

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of March 2013 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 for poultrymeat

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat (3), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of March 2013 for the subperiod from 1 April to 30 June 2013 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged for the subperiod from 1 April to 30 June 2013 under Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 March 2013.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

3

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Order No | Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.4.2013-30.6.2013
  (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 09.4410 | 0,275711 |
| 2 | 09.4411 | 0,282249 |
| 3 | 09.4412 | 0,303802 |
| 4 | 09.4420 | 0,415976 |
| 6 | 09.4422 | 0,418413 |

Group No

Order No

Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.4.2013-30.6.2013

(%)

1

09.4410

0,275711

2

09.4411

0,282249

3

09.4412

0,303802

4

09.4420

0,415976

6

09.4422

0,418413

---
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


Subsidiaries of the Registrant:

Transworld Wireless Television, Inc. - A Nevada Corporation
Auckland Independent Television Services, Ltd. - A New Zealand Corporation
Telecom Investment Corporation. -  A Delaware Corporation
WCI de Argentina, S.A. -  An Argentinean Corporation
WCI de Cayman, Inc. -  A Cayman Islands Corporation
Chispa Dos, Inc. - A Cayman Islands Corporation
TeLatin, Inc. - A Cayman Islands Corporation
Television Interactiva, S.A. - A Costa Rican Corporation
Papeles de Curcuma, S.A. - A Costa Rican Corporation
Multicable, S.A. de C.V. - El Salvadoran Corporation
Cablevisa, S.A. de C.V. - El Salvadoran Corporation
Cybernet de El Salvador S.A. de C.V. - El Salvadoran Corporation
Metrotelecom, S.A. de C.V. - El Salvadoran Corporation
Wireless Communications Holdings-Guatemala, S.A. - A Guatemalan Corporation
Wireless Communications License-Holdings Guatemala, S.A. - A Guatemalan
     Corporation
Wireless Communications Operations-Guatemala, S.A. - A Guatemalan Corporation
Convergence Communications, S.A. de C.V. - A Mexican Corporation
International Van, S.A. de C.V. - A Mexican Corporation
Wireless Communications Panama, S.A. - A Panamanian Joint Venture Corporation
Interamerican Telecom Inc. - A Panamanian Corporation
Caracas Viva Vision TV, S.A. - A Venezuelan Corporation
Communicaciones Centurion, S.A. - A Venezuelan Corporation
Communicationes Spectrum, S.A. - A Venezuelan Corporation
Interamerican Net de Venezuela, S.A. - A Venezuelan Corporation
WCI de Venezuela, C.A. - A Venezuelan Corporation
GBnet Corporation - A British Virgin Is. Corporation
GBnet, S.A. - A Guatemalan Corporation
GBnet, S.A. de C.V. - El Salvadoran Corporation
GBnet de Honduras, S. A. - A Honduran Corporation
GBnet, S.A. - A Nicaragua Corporation
GB.net, Inc. - a Panamanian Corporation
GBM Net, S.A. - A Dominican Republic Corporation
GBnet, S.A. - A Costa Rican Corporation
WCI de Colombia - a Delaware Corporation
**Exhibit 5.2**

**CERTIFICATION**
> 
I, Gaétan Mercier, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Virginia Mines Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 29, 2007 

/s/ Gaétan Mercier     Gaétan Mercier     Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.3

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, I, P.
Chrisman Iribe, President of Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation, hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) |  | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                      
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2003, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation.

|                |  |                                                              
|--------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------
|August 13, 2003 |  | /s/ P. CHRISMAN IRIBE                                        
|                |  |                                                              
|                |  | P. Chrisman Iribe
President
Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation and will be retained by Selkirk
Cogen Funding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Thomas BOBBITT v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY.

No. 601P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Thomas J. Ziko, Special Deputy Attorney General, Katherine A. Murphy, Assistant Attorney General, for NCSU.

Barry Nakell, for Bobbitt.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of November 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-17-00233-CR

Joe Angel Lopez

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 4

of Tarrant County (1455366D)

July 12, 2018

Opinion by Justice Pittman

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mark T. Pittman_________________

 Justice Mark T. Pittman