alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A),  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Charles Baker, certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Monster Worldwide, Inc.;

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: December 13, 2006 |  | By: | /s/CHARLES BAKERCharles Baker
      Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
### Appeal No. 2021AP51 Cir. Ct. No. 2019PA310PJ



### STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS

DISTRICT IV

I N RE THE 

### P ATERNITY OF 

### M.K.W.:

J ON 

### R ONALD 

### K RUEGER



### ,

P ETITIONER



### - R ESPONDENT



### ,

V



### .

R ACHELLE 

### S IOBHAN 

### W HARTON



### ,

R ESPONDENT



### - A PPELLANT



### . 

### FILED

February 15

, 2022

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Court of Appeals



### ERRATA SHEET

Sheila T. Reiff

Clerk of Court of Appeals

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District I

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District III

Electronic Notice

Christina Plum

, Sarah Motiff

Court of Appeals

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District II

Electronic Notice

Court of Appeals District IV

Electronic Notice Hon. Frank D. Remington

Circuit Court Judge

Electronic Notice

Carlo Esqueda

Clerk of Circuit Court

Dane County Courthouse

Electronic Notice

Jennifer L. Binkley

Electronic Notice

Maryam Ghayyad

Electronic Notice

Elizabeth A. Mackey

Electronic Notice

John P. Louderman III

Electronic NoticeNo. 2021AP51

2 Dawn M. Peters

Assistant Corporation Counsel

Rm. 365

210 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.

Madison, WI 53703



### PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that corrections were made to paragraph s

4 and 43 in the above

- captioned opinion which was released on February 10, 2022

.

A corrected electronic version in its entirety is available on the court's website at

www.wicourts.gov.3
MORTON v. LEE.

No. COA06-1509.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Brunswick (04CVS451).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and Remanded in part; Vacated in part.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JAMES C. ZELTER, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



| |  |                        |  | 
| |  | ---------------------- |  | 
| |  |                       
| |  | /s/ JAMES C. ZELTER    |  | 
| |  | Name: James C. Zelter  |  | 
| |  | Date: November 8, 2013 |  |
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Citigroup Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II (the‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of CitigroupManaged Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ JenniferMagro

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

JenniferMagroCitigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officerand Director

Date:   November 14,2006

----
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3055 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rate of the 

excise tax on certain wooden arrows designed for use by children. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2008 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. SMITH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify 

the rate of the excise tax on certain wooden arrows 

designed for use by children. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF RATE OF EXCISE TAX ON 

4 CERTAIN WOODEN ARROWS DESIGNED FOR 

5 USE BY CHILDREN. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 4161(b) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to arrows) 

8 is amended by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub9 paragraph (C) and by inserting after subparagraph (A) 

10 the following new subparagraph: 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3055 IS

1 ‘‘(B) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN WOODEN

2 ARROW SHAFTS.—Subparagraph (A) shall not 

3 apply to any shaft consisting of all natural 

4 wood with no laminations or artificial means of 

5 enhancing the spine of such shaft (whether sold 

6 separately or incorporated as part of a finished 

7 or unfinished product) of a type used in the 

8 manufacture of any arrow which after its as9 sembly— 

‘‘(i) measures 5 10 ⁄16 of an inch or less in 

11 diameter, and 

12 ‘‘(ii) is not suitable for use with a bow 

13 described in paragraph (1)(A).’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to shafts first sold after the date 

16 of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE v. DAVIS.

No. COA06-654.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Forsyth (02CRS61720).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1442
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  9514
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         458,879
<DEPRECIATION>                                 51,289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 437,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          32,659
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2
<OTHER-SE>                                     405,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   437,865
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,287
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             324
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7,689
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,689
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7689
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .32
        


</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 744/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 744/2013 of 31 July 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 744/2013                     

# of 31 July 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 July 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jonah Seymour, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 672]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered August 2, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]), defendant contends that Supreme Court *1293failed to exercise its discretion with respect to sentencing but instead erroneously deemed itself bound by the sentencing commitment made in connection with the plea bargain *(see People v Farrar, 52*NY2d 302, 305-307 [1981]; *see also People v Schafer,*19 AD3d 1133 [2005]; *People v Figueroa,*17 AD3d 1130, 1131 [2005]; *People v Stanley,*309 AD2d 1254 [2003]). The record does not support defendant’s contention. Rather, we conclude that the comments of the court did not indicate any misapprehension on its part that it lacked discretion in the matter of sentencing. “In any event, a court’s expression of an erroneous belief that it lacks any sentencing discretion following a negotiated plea . . . will warrant a [remittal] for resentencing only where the record indicates possible harm flowing from the court’s error, such as some indication of reservation by the court as to the fairness of the sentence to be imposed” *(People v Diaz,*304 AD2d 468, 468 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 561 [2003]; *see People v Fishman,*14 AD3d 411 [2005]; *People v Pena,*309 AD2d 687, 688 [2003], *lv denied 2*NY3d 744 [2004]; *People v Barzge,*244 AD2d 213 [1997], *lv denied*91 NY2d 889 [1998]). Here, the court expressed no reservation with respect to the fairness to defendant of the sentence to be imposed in accordance with the plea bargain, and the record does not otherwise indicate “possible harm flowing from the court’s [alleged] error” *(Diaz,*304 AD2d at 468). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10037

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Nohe Dominguez-Morales,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-220-1

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Nohe Dominguez-Morales appeals his conviction and sentence for 

illegal reentry after deportation under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). He

argues that treating a prior felony conviction that increases the statutory 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 4, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10037 Document: 00516495829 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/04/2022
No. 22-10037

2

maximum under § 1326(b) as a sentencing factor, rather than a separate 

element of the offense, violates the Constitution. 

Dominguez-Morales correctly concedes that his argument is 

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he 

wishes to preserve it for further review. See United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 

546, 553-54 (5th Cir. 2019). The Government has moved without opposition 

for summary affirmance or, alternatively, for an extension of time to file its 

brief.

Because the Government’s position “is clearly right as a matter of law 

so that there can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case,” 

Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), 

summary affirmance is proper. Accordingly, the motion for summary 

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative motion for an extension of 

time to file a brief is DENIED.

Case: 22-10037 Document: 00516495829 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/04/2022
**EXHIBIT32**

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Young Broadcasting Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 

May 8,2007
|        | /s/ Vincent  J.Young    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Vincent J. Young        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ James A.  Morgan    |
|   | James A. Morgan         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# Council Decision of 12 June 2014 appointing a member of the Scientific and Technical Committee (2014/354/Euratom)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 12 June 2014

# appointing a member of the Scientific and Technical Committee

# (2014/354/Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 134 thereof;

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission;

Whereas:

(1)By Decision 2013/412/Euratom(1), the Council appointed the members of the Scientific and Technical Committee (the ‘Committee’) for the period 25 July 2013                              to 24 July 2018,

(2)Following the resignation of Mr Edouard SINNER, a seat on the Committee has become vacant. A new member should therefore be                              appointed for the remainder of Mr Edouard SINNER's term of office,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Roland ZEYEN is hereby appointed a member of the Scientific and Technical Committee until 24 July 2018.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 12 June 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

Y. Maniatis                            

1

Council Decision 2013/412/Euratom of 22 July 2013 renewing the membership of the Scientific and Technical Committee and repealing                              the Decision of 13 November 2012 appointing the members of the Scientific and Technical Committee (OJ L 205, 1.8.2013, p. 11).
```

                                                                   Exhibit 99.6

              **CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

     In  connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q of
Selkirk  Cogen  Partners,  L.P. for the quarter  ended June 30, 2002, I, John R.
Cooper,  Senior Vice  President,  Chief  Financial  Officer and Treasurer of JMC
Selkirk,  Inc., as Managing  General  Partner of Selkirk Cogen  Partners,  L.P.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.  1350, as adopted  pursuant  toss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

          (1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
               2002 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
               15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  the information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q
               for the  quarter  ended June 30,  2002  fairly  presents,  in all
               faterial  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               mperations of Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P.

August 14, 2002                             /s/ John R. Cooper
                                            -----------------
                                            John R. Cooper
                                            Senior Vice President,
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            and Treasurer
                                            JMC Selkirk, Inc.
```
EXHIBIT 18
May 15, 2000

Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P.
One Bowdoin Square
Boston, MA 02114

Dear Sirs/Madams:

At your request, we have read the description  included in your Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000,  of the facts  relating to your change  during the quarter ended
March 31, 2000 to account for major  maintenance  and overhauls  expenditures at
your power  production  facility as  incurred.  We believe,  on the basis of the
facts  so  set  forth  and  other  information  furnished  to us by  appropriate
officials of the Partnership,  that the accounting change described in your Form
10-Q is to an  alternative  accounting  principle  that is preferable  under the
circumstances.

We have not audited any financial  statements of Selkirk  Cogen  Partners,  L.P.
(the  Partnership)  as of any date or for any period  subsequent to December 31,
1999. Therefore,  we are unable to express, and we do not express, an opinion on
the facts set forth in the above-mentioned Form 10-Q, on the related information
furnished to us by officials of the Partnership,  or on the financial  position,
results of  operations,  or cash flows of the  Partnership as of any date or for
any period subsequent to December 31, 1999.

Yours truly,

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP











                                       16