alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1



 










Exhibit 10.1




STEWART INFORMATION SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES




Executive Officers’ Bonus Plans

June 30, 2005



The following summarizes the terms of the bonus arrangements approved by our Compensation Committee
with respect to our executive officers:



MALCOLM S. MORRIS, as Chairman of the Board and Co-Chief Executive Officer, shall receive, in
addition to his salary, 1.00% on the first $20,000,000 of the consolidated income before taxes of
Stewart Title Guaranty Company as reported to its stockholder, 0.75% of the profits from
$20,000,001 to $40,000,000, 0.50% of the profits from $40,000,001 to $60,000,000 and 0.25% of the
profits exceeding $60,000,000. For the calendar year 2005, Mr. Malcolm S. Morris shall receive no
less than $250,000 in bonus compensation.



STEWART MORRIS, JR., as President and Co-Chief Executive Officer, shall receive, in addition to his
salary, 1.00% on the first $20,000,000 of the consolidated income before taxes of Stewart Title
Guaranty Company as reported to its stockholder, 0.75% of the profits from $20,000,001 to
$40,000,000, 0.50% of the profits from $40,000,001 to $60,000,000 and 0.25% of the profits
exceeding $60,000,000. For the calendar year 2005, Mr. Stewart Morris, Jr. shall receive no less
than $250,000 in bonus compensation.



CARLOSS MORRIS, as Chairman of the Executive Committee, shall receive, in addition to his salary,
1.00% of the first $16,500,000 of the consolidated income before taxes of Stewart Title Guaranty
Company as reported to its stockholder. For the calendar year 2005, Mr. Carloss Morris shall
receive no more than $165,000 in bonus compensation.



STEWART MORRIS, as Vice Chairman of the Executive Committee, shall receive, in addition to his
salary, 1.00% of the first $16,500,000 of the consolidated income before taxes of Stewart Title
Guaranty Company as reported to its stockholder. For the calendar year 2005, Mr. Stewart Morris
shall receive no more than $165,000 in bonus compensation.



MAX CRISP, as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary-Treasurer, shall
receive, in addition to his salary, 0.50% of the first $50,000,000 of the consolidated income
before taxes of Stewart Title Guaranty Company as reported to its stockholder, 0.40% of the profits
from $50,000,001 to $75,000,000, 0.30% of the profits from $75,000,001 to $100,000,000 and 0.20% of
the profits exceeding $100,000,000. For the calendar year 2005, Mr. Crisp shall receive no less
than $145,000 in bonus compensation and his bonus may not exceed 75.00% of the total base plus
bonus earned by either of the Co-Chief Executive Officers.



MATTHEW W. MORRIS, as Senior Vice President, Planning and Development, shall receive, in addition
to his salary, 0.10% of the consolidated income before taxes of Stewart Title Guaranty Company as
reported to its stockholder. For the calendar year 2005, Mr. Matthew W. Morris shall receive no
less than $75,000 in bonus compensation. In addition, Mr. Matthew W. Morris may be eligible to
receive up to $25,000 of discretionary bonuses based on the completion of certain projects.
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles Orlando WILLIAMS.

No. 350P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Christy E. Wilhelm, for Williams.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of July 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 28, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00103

- CV

WESTWIND HOMES d/b/a Westwind Development , G.P.

- Laredo, LLC, and Centerpoint

Energy Resources Corp

, Appellant

v.

Fernando RAMIREZ and Minerva Ramirez,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT003262

- D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant ’ s Mo tion fo r Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

appellant ’ s brief is due on or before August 16, 2019.

___ ______________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 28th day of June, 2019

.

___________________________________ K eith E. H ottle

, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-24-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-26-1998
<CASH>                                              37,478
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       45,570
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (1,521)
<INVENTORY>                                        405,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   490,491
<PP&E>                                             426,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (107,566)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     917,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              395,017 
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               318
<OTHER-SE>                                         331,886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       917,136
<SALES>                                            346,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   347,210
<CGS>                                              257,188
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      257,188
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    94,285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (6,938)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (2,622)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (3,746)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (3,746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.12)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-50371

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JONATHAN MONDRAGON-ESTRADA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-3406-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jonathan Mondragon-Estrada appeals the sentence imposed following 

his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry following deportation in violation 

8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). He argues that the enhancement of his sentence 

pursuant to § 1326(b)(2), which increased his statutory maximum sentence to 

20 years of imprisonment and three years of supervised release, is 

unconstitutional because of the treatment of the provision as a sentencing 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 31, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-50371 Document: 00515181732 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2019
No. 19-50371

2

factor rather than as an element of a separate offense that must be proved to 

a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed 

by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). However, he seeks 

to preserve the argument for possible Supreme Court review because, he 

argues, subsequent decisions indicate that the Supreme Court may reconsider 

its holding in Almendarez-Torres.

In Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 239-47, the Supreme Court held that 

for purposes of a statutory sentencing enhancement, a prior conviction is not a 

fact that must be alleged in an indictment or found by a jury beyond a 

reasonable doubt. This court has held that subsequent Supreme Court 

decisions did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. Wallace, 

759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014) (considering the effect of Alleyne v. United 

States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013)); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 

625-26 (5th Cir. 2007) (considering the effect of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 

U.S. 466 (2000)). Thus, Mondragon-Estrada’s argument is foreclosed.

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is 

GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to 

file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-50371 Document: 00515181732 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/31/2019
STATE v. GUZMAN-PASCUAL.

No. COA06-707.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007.

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS56620, 04CRS56621).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Political and Security Committee Decision EUCAP Sahel Niger/1/2014Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision EUCAP Sahel Niger/1/2014 of 14 January 2014 extending the mandate of the Head of            Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (2014/18/CFSP)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision EUCAP Sahel Niger/1/2014                     

# of 14 January 2014

# extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger)

# (2014/18/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to the Council Decision 2012/392/CFSP of 16 July 2012 on the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel                           Niger)(1),                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 9(1) of Decision 2012/392/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance                              with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic                              direction of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

(2)On 12 November 2013, the PSC adopted Decision EUCAP Sahel Niger/2/2013(2), appointing Mr Filip DE CEUNINCK as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Niger, *ad interim*, from 1 November to 31 December 2013.

(3)On 5 December 2013, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed to extend of the                              mandate of Mr Filip DE CEUNINCK as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Niger, *ad interim*, from 1 January 2014 untill the appointment of the new Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Niger.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The mandate of Mr Filip DE CEUNINCK as Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) is                     hereby extended until the appointment of the new Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Niger.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply from 1 January 2014.

Done at Brussels, 14 January 2014.

*For the Political and Security Committee*                            

*The Chairperson*                            

W. Stevens                            

1

OJ L 187, 17.7.2012, p. 48.                           

2

Political and Security Committee Decision EUCAP SAHEL Niger/2/2013 of 12 November 2013 on the appointment of the Head of Mission                              of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (OJ L 305, 15.11.2013, p. 18).
STATE v. Quentin T. WILLIAMSON.

No. 139P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Thomas J. Ziko, Special Deputy Attorney General, William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th day of September 2007 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of October 2007."
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

GUARANTEE 
 Warner Music
Group Corp. (the “Guarantor”) hereby unconditionally guarantees WMG Acquisition Corp.’s 5.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2023 (the “Notes”) issued pursuant to the Indenture, dated as of November 1, 2012 (the
“Secured Notes Base Indenture”), by and among WMG Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation, as issuer (the “Issuer”), the guarantors party thereto (the “Guarantors”), Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Trustee (the “Trustee”) and Credit Suisse AG, as Notes Authorized Agent and as Collateral Agent, as supplemented by the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 27, 2016 (“Fifth Supplemental
Indenture”), by and among the Issuer, the Guarantors and the Trustee. The Secured Notes Base Indenture, as supplemented by the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, is referred to herein as the “Indenture”.  

The obligations of the Guarantor pursuant to this Guarantee and the Indenture are expressly set forth in Article Ten of the Secured Notes Base
Indenture, and reference is hereby made to the Indenture for the precise terms and limitations of this Guarantee. 
 Capitalized terms used
but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Indenture. 
 [Signatures on Following Pages] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Warner Music Group Corp. has caused this Guarantee to be signed by a duly
authorized officer. 
 DATED: July 27, 2016 
  

			
	WARNER MUSIC GROUP CORP.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Paul Robinson

	Name:	 	Paul Robinson
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary


 [Signature Page to the Warner Music Group Guarantee]
STATE v. Ricky Jackson HENNIS.

No. 342P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 19, 2007.

J. Clark Fischer, Winston-Salem, for Hennis.

Belinda J. Foster, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 646 S.E.2d 398.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th day of July 2007 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of July 2007."
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 19, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00638

- CR

In re John David Garcia

Original Mandamus Proc eeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On September 10 , 2018, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering

the petition, this court conclu des relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the

petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED FOR WANT O F JURISDICTION

. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on September 19, 2018

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of September, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11

- 05

- 075

- CRW, styled The State of Texas v. John David Garc ia , pending

in the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas, the Honorable Russell Wilson presiding.
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Nicholas BOWMAN.

No. 327P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Rick Glazier, Fayetteville, for Bowman.

Thomas Ziko, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 644 S.E.2d 596.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of July 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th day of July 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of East Texas Financial Services, Inc., at
June 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         524,238
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       5,226,690
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   191
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  2,039,439
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      46,988,264
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        47,391,454
<LOANS>                                     54,856,306
<ALLOWANCE>                                    273,659
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             112,696,849
<DEPOSITS>                                  89,300,964
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,963,420
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            961,319
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,564
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,458,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             112,696,849
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,084,553
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,804,158
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,888,711
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,310,523
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,315,251
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,573,460
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,894,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                889,580
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     559,934
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   559,934
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.16
<LOANS-NON>                                    162,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                174,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               289,120
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   71,345
<RECOVERIES>                                    55,884
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              273,659
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            74,137
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        199,522
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrants Form 10-K for the year ended January 26, 1998, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements, including the notes
thereto.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-26-1998
<CASH>                                      15,387,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  336,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0,
<INVENTORY>                                    493,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,530,000
<PP&E>                                      15,077,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,074,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,969,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,323,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,532,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,969,000
<SALES>                                     54,659,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,659,000
<CGS>                                       48,445,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               50,554,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (593,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             200,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,498,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,799,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,699,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,699,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7166

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-01-240)

Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 4, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mark C. Moore, Assistant

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Regan Alexandra

Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s

order denying his motion for review of his sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3742 (2000) and for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See United States v. Bryson, No. CR-01-240

(D.S.C. July 18, 2003). In his informal brief, Bryson asserts

several claims that were not raised in the district court. We

decline to address these claims. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d

246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993) (declining to consider claims raised for

first time on appeal, absent exceptional circumstances). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED