alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
phot_ex1072.htm


Exhibit 10.72


 








 


3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500


 


Las Vegas, Nevada 89169


 


 


ADVISORY SERVICES AGREEMENT


 







DATE:                    09/27/15                    







TO:                         Marco Hegyi


 


FROM:                  Donna Silverman REGARDING: Advisory Services Invoice


 







Pursuant to TCA Fund Management Group ("TCA") having providing assistance to Growlife, Inc. "the Company", the following scope of work and associated fees have been provided and earned as of this date.


 


 1.             Services Provided:


 


A range of advisory services which may, or may not, include (i) identifying, evaluating and advising in relation to the Company's current structural (including business model), financial, operational, managerial, strategic and other needs and objectives, (ii) preparing and coordinating with the Company and others in the development of business plans, and financial models, (iii) identifying potential merger, acquisition, divestiture, consolidation or other combination ("M&A Transaction") opportunities and negotiating, structuring and advising in connection with potential M&A Transactions, (v) advising and assisting the Company in connection with the preparation of any registration statements, periodic or other SEC reports or proxies, and (vi) coordinating with, and advising in connection with the activities of, Outside Professionals, including without limitation attorneys, accountants, market professionals, etc. These services may or may not have been in conjunction with working with the Company to obtain financing with TCA's affiliated fund, TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP.


 


2.           Compensation:


 


In consideration for the services provided by TCA to the Company as of this date, the Company shall compensate TCA in the amount of $1,500,000.


 


If the Company is a quoted company on any listed exchange then TCA will accept restricted shares of the Company stock. The number of shares issued will be set at 100.00% of the amount due up to availability. Upon sale of these securities, TCA will provide a reconciliation to the Company. If at that time the value of the stock is greater than the amount owed, the balance of the shares shall be returned to the Company. If  the then current value of the shares is less than the amount due, then the Company will be responsible for immediately delivering additional shares to be sold by TCA in order for TCA to realize the full value of the amount owed.


 




  





  











  






 



Should TCA and the Company complete a financing with TCA's affiliated Fund, TCA Global Credit Master Fund, LP ("TCA-Fund") prior to payment in full of the amount owed, then the payment of this obligation shall be included in the final documents for said financing with the TCA­ Fund






 


Accepted and Agreed:


 







COMPANY NAME: GROWLIFE, INC.







By:/s/ Marco Hegyi


Name: Marco Hegyi


Title: President
ARMSTRONG v. BARRACK.

No. 504P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Christopher N. Heiskell, for Barrack.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of February 2007 by Plaintiff for "Petition for Rehearing":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."
# L_2013133EN.01001101.xml

| 17.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 133/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 133/11

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 455/2013

of 7 May 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Ξηρά Σύκα Ταξιάρχη (Xira Syka Taxiarchi) (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Greece’s application to register the name ‘Ξηρά Σύκα Ταξιάρχη’ (Xira Syka Taxiarchi) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Greece’s application to register the name ‘Ξηρά Σύκα Ταξιάρχη’ (Xira Syka Taxiarchi) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 155, 1.6.2012, p. 11.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

GREECE

Ξηρά Σύκα Ταξιάρχη (Xira Syka Taxiarchi) (PDO)

---
Rocky Burris EUDY, Employee v. MICHELIN NORTH AMERICA, INC., Employer and ACE USA Insurance Company, Carrier.

No. 285P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Paul C. Lawrence, Taurus E. Becton, Charlotte, for Michelin North America, et al.

Bobby L. Bollinger, Charlotte, for Eudy.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 645 S.E.2d 83.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 19th day of June 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of June 2007 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000929547
<NAME> INKINE PHARMACEUTICAL
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,587
<SECURITIES>                                     9,385
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,028
<PP&E>                                             523
<DEPRECIATION>                                     212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,619
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,372
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,225)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,225)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,225)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.25)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                            [Letterhead of KPMG LLP]

                         Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Trustees and Shareholders
ElderTrust:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-80719) on Form S-8 (for the 1998 Share Option Incentive Plan), and the
registration statement (No. 333-80717) on Form S-8 (for 1999 Share Option and
Incentive Plan) of our report dated January 14, 2000, except as to note 5 which
is as of March 21, 2000, related to the consolidated balance sheets of
ElderTrust and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 1999 and the period from January 30, 1998 to
December 31, 1998 and related financial statement schedules, included herein.

/s/ KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
May 8, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of the Travelers Life and Annuity Company and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000929498
<NAME> THE TRAVELERS LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,217,601
<CASH>                                           2,683
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         307,404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,337,023
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                952,706
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        4,738,867
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     484,831
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,337,023
<PREMIUMS>                                      18,157
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            133,523
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               7,893
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  44,398
<BENEFITS>                                     100,990
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     14,351
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             7,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,498
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,425
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             53,073
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    53,073
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3156 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe a standard 

to preclude commercials from being broadcast at louder volumes than 

the program material they accompany. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2008 

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe a standard to preclude commercials from being 

broadcast at louder volumes than the program material 

they accompany. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Commercial Advertise5 ment Loudness Mitigation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RULEMAKING ON LOUD COMMERCIALS REQUIRED. 

7 (a) REGULATION REQUIRED.—Within one year after 

8 the date of enactment of this Act, the Federal CommuVerDate Aug 31 2005 07:10 Jun 21, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3156.IS S3156

erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3156 IS

1 nications Commission shall prescribe pursuant to the 

2 Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et seq.) a 

3 regulation that provides, in connection with any video pro4 gramming that is broadcast or that is distributed by any 

5 multichannel video programming distributor, that— 

6 (1) advertisements accompanying such video 

7 programming shall not be excessively noisy or stri8 dent; 

9 (2) such advertisements shall not be presented 

10 at modulation levels substantially higher than the 

11 program material that such advertisements accom12 pany; and 

13 (3) the average maximum loudness of such ad14 vertisements shall not be substantially higher than 

15 the average maximum loudness of the program ma16 terial that such advertisements accompany. 

17 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, the 

18 terms ‘‘video programming’’ and ‘‘multichannel video pro19 gramming distributor’’ have the meanings given such 

20 terms in section 602 of Communications Act of 1934 (47 

21 U.S.C. 522). 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Carroll Shelby, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Advanced Engine
Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

(c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of
the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: September 28, 2004                  /s/ CARROLL SHELBY
                                          ------------------
                                              Carroll Shelby,

                                                President
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kevin P. Knight, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  
 May
      12, 2008
              By:
              /s/
      Kevin P. KnightKevin
      P. KnightChief
      Executive Officer
 
  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight
Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
    Back to Form 10-Q
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-710

_____________________________

JOHN E. PUGH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Ross M. Goodman, Judge.

March 13, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS,MAKAR,and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Justin F. Karpf, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
#### Chad Ofiara, Appellant, v Nike, Inc., Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 652]

Crew III, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Aulisi, J.), entered June 3, 2003 in Fulton County, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution.

Plaintiff commenced this action in November 1998 seeking to recover for injuries he purportedly sustained as the result of an alleged defect in a pair of Nike athletic shoes. Issue was joined in November 2000, at which time defendant also served various discovery demands upon plaintiff. Plaintiff thereafter failed to respond to defendant’s discovery demands and, by letter dated December 27, 2001, defendant demanded that plaintiff serve and file a note of issue within 90 days in accordance with CPLR 3216. When plaintiff failed to do so, defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for want of prosecution. Supreme Court granted defendant’s motion, and this appeal by plaintiff ensued.

Although acknowledging that he received defendant’s December 2001 letter and failed to timely respond thereto, counsel for plaintiff nonetheless asserts that such document fails to meet the statutory requirements for a 90-day demand pursuant to CPLR 3216. We cannot agree. Contrary to counsel’s assertion, defendant’s demand was not “buried” in the midst of a lengthy piece of legal correspondence. The relatively brief letter, which was sent by certified mail, states in no uncertain terms that it is a demand pursuant to CPLR 3216 for plaintiff to resume prosecution of this action and file a note of issue within 90 days of plaintiffs receipt of the letter. Such letter further states that plaintiffs failure to comply with such demand would serve as the basis for defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint.

Based upon our review of the record and the underlying statute, it is clear that defendant’s December 2001 letter conforms with the demand requirements of CPLR 3216 (b) (3). Inasmuch as plaintiff failed to advance a “justifiable excuse for the delay *687and a good and meritorious cause of action” (CPLR 3216 [e]), we cannot say that Supreme Court abused its discretion in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for want of prosecution *(see Olejak v Town of Schodack,*295 AD2d 679, 679-680 [2002]).

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
STATE of North Carolina v. Billy Thomas PEARSON.

No. 426P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Billy T. Pearson, Pro Se.

Ronald M. Marquette, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th day of August 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."