alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                         EXHIBIT 15.2 - LETTER RE: UNAUDITED
                            INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION





Board of Directors
Price Enterprises, Inc.


We are aware of the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-60999) pertaining to the Price Enterprises 1995 Combined Stock Grant
and Stock Option Plan and the Price Enterprises Directors' 1995 Stock Option
Plan of our report dated April 11, 1997 relating to the unaudited consolidated
interim financial statements of Price Enterprises, Inc. which are included in
its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 16, 1997.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933 our report is not a part
of a registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within the
meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.




ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Diego, California
April 11, 1997

                                          19
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 50436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17015]



[[Page 50436]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 5163]


Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Monet's Antibes''

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
[79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459], Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 [112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.], Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999 [64 FR 56014], Delegation of 
Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999 [64 FR 57920], as amended, and 
Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I 
hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition, 
``Monet's Antibes,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is 
imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign lender. I also 
determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the 
J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, California, from on or about 
September 2, 2005, to on or about January 31, 2006, and at possible 
additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. 
Public Notice of these determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact Paul 
W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, (202) 453-
8052, and the address is United States Department of State, SA-44, Room 
700, 301 4th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20547-0001.

    Dated: August 22, 2005.
Travis Horel,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-17015 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
Joel KENNEDY v. SPEEDWAY MOTORSPORTS INC., Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc., doing business as Lowe's Motor Speedway or Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse Motor Speedway, and Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC. David and Denise Prosser v. Speedway Motorsports Inc., Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc., doing business as Lowe's Motor Speedway or Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse Motor Speedway, and Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC. Mark Nash v. Speedway Motorsports Inc., Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc., doing business as Lowe's Motor Speedway or Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse Motor Speedway, and Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC. Jerry Stephens v. Speedway Motorsports Inc., Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc., doing business as Lowe's Motor Speedway or Lowe's Home Improvement Warehouse Motor Speedway, and Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC.

No. 469P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

G. Gray Wilson, Kevin B. Cartledge, Winston-Salem, Katherine C. Wagner, for Kennedy, et al.

David N. Allen, Charlotte, for Speedway Motorsports, et al.

*807*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 1st day of September 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."

Justice MARTIN recused.
# L_2013169EN.01007001.xml

| 21.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 169/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 169/70

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 June 2013

appointing two Austrian members and two Austrian alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/300/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Austrian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | Two members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Gerhard DÖRFLER and Mr Josef PÜHRINGER. Two alternate members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Viktor SIGL and Mr Wolfgang WALDNER, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Gerhard DÖRFLER and Mr Josef PÜHRINGER. Two alternate members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Viktor SIGL and Mr Wolfgang WALDNER,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as members:






  — | Dr Peter KAISER, Landeshauptmann, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as members:

—

Dr Peter KAISER, Landeshauptmann,

| — | Dr Michael STRUGL, MBA, Landesrat; |
| --- | --- |

—

Dr Michael STRUGL, MBA, Landesrat;

and

| (b) | as alternate members:






  — | Mr Herwig SEISER, Landtagsabgeordneter, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate members:

—

Mr Herwig SEISER, Landtagsabgeordneter,

| — | Mr Viktor SIGL, Landtagspräsident. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Viktor SIGL, Landtagspräsident.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 18 June 2013.

For the Council

The President

P. HOGAN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
In re Z.C.M. and C.E.M. appealed by Respondent-Mother.

No. 71P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina,

June 27, 2007.

Richard E. Jester, for Mother.

Jamie Hamlet, for Alamance County DSS.

Stuart A. Brock, Attorney Advocate, Charlotte, for Guardian ad Litem.

Chris Watkins, for Father.

Mildred Hardy, for Blantons.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of February 2007 by Respondent (Mother) in this matter for discretionary review *900of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."

HUDSON, J., recused.
STATE v. BURCHFIELD

No. COA06-922.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Graham (05CRS50227).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LINDA ROCHA

,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION

,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 15

- 16908

D.C. No.

1:14

- CV

- 00842

- BAM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California
Barbara A. McAuliffe

, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 16 , 2017 ** San Francisco, California

Before: MURGUIA and CANBY , Circuit Judges, and RUFE, *** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Cynthia M. Rufe, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

MAY 24 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

Linda Rocha appeals the district court’s order granting California

Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (“CDCR’s”) motion for judgment

on the pleadings on res judicata grounds. We affirm.

1. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Rocha t imely filed

a notice of appeal within 30 days of the district court’s entry of judgment in favor

of CDCR. ER 1

- 2

. The district court’s earlier judgment in favor of Defendant

Groves (who at that point was the only d efendant who had been served) did not

trigger the 30

- day window to file a notice of appeal because the judgment resolved

only the claims against Groves and the district court went on to adjudicate Rocha’s

claims against CDCR. See Disabled Rights Action Comm. v. Las Vegas Events,

Inc.

, 375 F.3d 861, 872 (9th Cir. 2004)

.

2. The district court correctly held that res judicata barred Rocha’s

claims

, a decision we review de novo

. United S tates v. Liquidators of European

Fed. Credit Bank , 630 F.3d 1139, 1144 (9th Cir. 2011). Res judicata requir es: “(1)

an identity of claims, (2) a final judgment on the merits, and (3) privity between

parties.” Id. at 1150 (quoting Tahoe

- Sierra Pres. Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Reg’l

Planning Agency , 322 F.3d 1064, 1077 (9th Cir. 2003) ).

3. Regarding the first requiremen t, we agree with the district court that

there was an identity of claims between the two lawsuits because both stemmed

from the same transactional nucleus of facts : an alleged pattern of retaliation that3

ultimately resulted in Rocha’s termination

. Rocha failed to identify any barrier to

raising all of her claims during the first lawsuit. See Owens v. Kaiser Found.

Health Plan, Inc. , 244 F.3d 708, 713

- 14 (9th Cir. 2001)

. The final two elements are

met because Rocha previously filed a lawsuit against CDCR that resulted in a Rule

68 judgment , as Rocha acknowledges

.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
DATA FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT
EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          16,227
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         53
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,926
<PP&E>                                           7,916
<DEPRECIATION>                                     911
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,875
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,480
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,677
<SALES>                                          1,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,344
<CGS>                                              818
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,049
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 797
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        27
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,347)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,347)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.81)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Intellisync
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Woodson Hobbs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|(a) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(b) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: October 14, 2004

/s/ WOODSON HOBBSWoodson HobbsPresident and Chief Executive Officer

|* |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to and will be retained by Intellisync Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 670/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 670/2013 of 9 July 2013 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined            Nomenclature (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 670/2013                     

# of 9 July 2013

# concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1391 of 6 September 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 1218/1999 concerning the                                 classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 670/2013.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3218 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2008 

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain 

criminal history background checks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

S 3218 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal History 

3 Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

5 Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 5119a note) is amended by striking ‘‘a 60-month’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘a 66-month’’. 

Passed the Senate June 26, 2008. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
STATE v. ARCHIE.

COA06-111.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Forsyth (04CRS62575, 05CRS20410).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 749/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 749/2013 of 2 August 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 749/2013                     

# of 2 August 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 August 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHOR



I, Eugene J. Puritch, P. Eng., residing at 44 Turtlecreek Blvd., Brampton, Ontario, L6W 3X7,do hereby certify that:



1.

I am an independent mining consultant.

2.

I am a graduate of The Haileybury School of Mines, with a Technologist Diploma in Mining, as well as obtaining an additional year of undergraduate education in Mine Engineering at Queens University. In addition I have also met the Professional Engineers of Ontario Academic Requirement Committees Examination requirement for Bachelors Degree in Engineering Equivalency. I have practiced my profession continuously since 1978.  My summarized career experience is as follows:



- Mining Technologist - H.B.M.&S. and Inco Ltd.

1978-1980

- Open Pit Mine Engineer  Cassiar Asbestos/Brinco Ltd

1981-1983

- Pit Engineer/Drill & Blast Supervisor  Detour Lake Mine

1984-1986

- Self-Employed Mining Consultant  Timmins Area

1987-1988

- Mine Designer/Resource Estimator  Dynatec/CMD/Bharti

1989-1995

- Self-Employed Mining Consultant/Resource-Reserve Estimator

1995-2004

- President  P & E Mining Consultants Inc.

2004-Present



3.

I am a mining consultant currently licensed by the Professional Engineers of Ontario (License No. 100014010) and registered with the Ontario Association of Certified Engineering Technicians and Technologists as a Senior Engineering Technologist.  I am also a member of the National and Toronto CIM.

4.

I am responsible for sections 15, 17 and 18 (portions) of this report entitled.Technical Report and Resource Estimate on the Fuwan Property, Guangdong Province, China.

5.

I visited the Fuwan Property on Aug 25th, 2005.

6.

I am not aware of any material fact or material change with respect to the subject matter of the Report that is not reflected in the Report, the omission of which would make the Report misleading.

7.

I am an independent of the issuer applying all of the tests in sect 1.5 of NI 43-101.

8.

I have read NI 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 and the Report has been prepared in compliance therewith.

9.

I am a qualified person for the purposes of NI 43-101 due to my experience and current affiliation with a professional organization (Professional Engineers of Ontario) as defined in NI 43-101.

10.

I consent to the use of the Technical Report with the United Stated Securities Commission (SEC) with respect to Minco Mining & Metals Corporations Annual Form 20-F Registration Statement including the electronic publication in the EDGAR system with the SEC accessible by the public, of the Technical Report.



DATED this 9th Day of June, 2006

[ex141004.gif]



_______________________



Eugene Puritch, P.Eng.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Texas Petrochemical Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ending June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


September 30, 2002                       /s/ B. W. WAYCASTER
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         B. W. Waycaster
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. Bennie MACK.

No. 294P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 5, 2006.

John Payne, Assistant Attorney General, James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of June 2006 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of June 2006."