alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-11-1997
<CASH>                                         122,874
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,814
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,773
<INVENTORY>                                     14,975
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               225,052
<PP&E>                                         954,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                 285,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,037,457
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          190,643
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           902
<OTHER-SE>                                     150,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,037,457
<SALES>                                        102,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               346,887
<CGS>                                           90,722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  332,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,057
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,945
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,048
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             16,897
<DISCONTINUED>                                  25,146
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,043
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6721

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KENDESIA JUINIZE MAY, a/k/a Red, a/k/a Reds , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:19

- cr - 00007

- LMB

- 1 )

Submitted : September 14, 2021 Decided: September 20, 2021

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kendesia Juinize May, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kendesia Juinize May ap peals the district court’s order denying his renewed motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115

- 391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. After reviewing the record, we c onclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying May’s
renewed motion. See United States v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. 2021) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispen se with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

        In connection with the Transition Report of MailKey Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), Graham
Norton-Standen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Roger B. Ponting,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do each hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350), that to his
knowledge:

        (1)     the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                          /s/  Graham Norton-Standen
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Graham Norton-Standen
                                          Chief Executive Officer


                                          /s/  Roger B. Ponting
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Roger B. Ponting
                                          Chief Financial Officer


Date:  July 14, 2004
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 927/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 927/2013 of 25 September 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for alfonsinos in EU and            international waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Portugal         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 927/2013                     

# of 25 September 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for alfonsinos in EU and international waters of III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, XII                        and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Portugal                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 1262/2012 of 20 December 2012 fixing for 2013 and 2014 the fishing opportunities for EU vessels                              for certain deep-sea fish stocks(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 356, 22.12.2012, p. 22.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140579 & (54)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140579 COA: 281972 Wayne CC: 07-003296-FC HOUSAM J. BAYDOUN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that th e questions presented
should be reviewed by this Court.
```

                                                                   Exhibit 99.5

              **CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

     In  connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q of
Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P. for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, I, P. Chrisman
Iribe,  President of JMC Selkirk,  Inc., as Managing  General Partner of Selkirk
Cogen Partners,  L.P., hereby certify pursuant to 18  U.S.C.ss.1350,  as adopted
pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:

     (1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
          fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
          the  quarter  ended June 30,  2002 fairly  presents,  in all  material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Selkirk
          Cogen Partners, L.P.

August 14, 2002                                /s/ P. Chrisman Iribe
                                               --------------------
                                               P. Chrisman Iribe
                                               President
                                               JMC Selkirk, Inc.
```
IN RE J.P.M.

No. COA06-1269.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05J230).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for a new dispositional hearing.
SIMMONS v. MELON HR SOLUTIONS

No. COA06-1179

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. 255772).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN RE J.S.

No. COA06-551.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Henderson (02J103, 02J104).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
CARTER-HUBBARD v. WRMC HOSPITAL.

No. 411A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 4, 2006.

John M. Logsdon, North Wilkesboro, for WRMC Hospital.

John S. Willardson, Wilkesboro, for Carter-Hubbard Publishing.

Mark W. Merritt, Blake W. Thomas, Charlotte, for CMHA.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of October 2006 by NC Hospital Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of October 2006."
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                                  SUBSIDIARIES

 NAME OF                                                         JURISDICTION OF
SUBSIDIARY                                                         INCORPORATION
----------                                                         -------------

DNA Plant Technology Corporation (1)                                    Delaware

DNAP Technologies, Inc. (2)                                             Delaware

FreshWorld Farms, Inc. (2)                                              Delaware

DNAP Diagnostics, Inc. (2)                                              Delaware

VPP Corporation (1)                                                     Delaware

International Produce Holding Company (1)                               Delaware

R.B. Packing, Inc. (3)                                                   Arizona

R.B. Packing of California, Inc. (3)                                  California

R.B. Packing of Texas, Inc. (3)                                            Texas

Batiz & Sons, Inc. (3)                                                   Arizona

Tanimura Distributing, Inc. (4)                                       California

Premier Fruits & Vegetables BBL, Inc. (5)                         Quebec, Canada

Agricola Batiz, S.A. de C.V. (6)                           United Mexican States

Comercializadora Premier, S.A. de C.V. (7)                 United Mexican States

Interfruver de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (8)                    United Mexican States

Premier del Pacifico, S.A. de C.V. (9)                     United Mexican States

Asesoria y Servicios del Noreste, S.A. de C.V. (9)         United Mexican States

Siembra Cultivo y Cosecha del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V. (10)  United Mexican States
<PAGE>

(1) Wholly-owned subsidiary of DNAP Holding Corporation

(2) Wholly-owned subsidiary of DNA Plant Technology Corporation

(3) Wholly-owned subsidiary of International Produce Holding Company

(4) 75% owned by International Produce Holding Company

(5) 80% owned by International Produce Holding Company

(6) 80% owned by DNAP Holding Corporation

(7) Wholly-owned subsidiary of Agricola Batiz, S.A. de C.V.

(8) 50.01% owned by Agricola Batiz, S.A. de C.V.

(9) Wholly-owned by Interfruver de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.

(10) 98% owned by Agricola Batiz, S.A. de C.V.
STATE v. Levar Jamel ALLEN.

No. 485PA04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 5, 2006.

Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Michael K. Lands, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th day of August 2006 by Defendant to Declare Matter Moot Based on Trial Court's Compliance with Mandate:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of September 2006."
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS



I, John H. Bullion, Chief Executive Officer of Orphan Medical, Inc., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Orphan Medical, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 10, 2004

/s/ John H. Bullion

Chief Executive Officer

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6222
EDSON FURTADO, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. STATE OF MARYLAND, Office of the Attorney General; CLIFTON T. PERKINS HOSPITAL CENTER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv02627-RWT) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008 Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order dismissing without pre judice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action seeking damages for issues pertaining to his confinement in a psychiatric hospital. In his informal appellate brief, Furtado fails to address the district court’s basis for dismissing his case. Therefore, Furtado has waived appellate review of that issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief.”). Accordingly, we deny Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
DYSART v. CUMMINGS.

No. 132A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 23, 2007.

John Walter Bryant, Raleigh, for Cummings.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of April 2007 by Plaintiffs for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiffs shall have up to and including the 13th day of June 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of April 2007."
STATE v. MANANOV

No. COA06-1130.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Buncombe (05CRS56186).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Edward Louis BETHEA.

No. 362P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 25, 2006.

Edward Louis Bethea, Pro Se.

Gary A. Scarzafava, Assistant Attorney General, Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 25th day of July 2006 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Scotland County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of July 2006."
**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Michael K. Farrell, President of MetLife Life and Annuity Company of Connecticut,certify that:     1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MetLife Life and Annuity Company ofConnecticut;     2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:August 11, 2006         /s/Michael K. Farrell  Michael K. Farrell   *President*