alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7539

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

LUIS FELIPE MANGUAL, JR., a/k/a Darin Harris,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. 

(8:04-cr-00235-RWT-2; 8:14-cv-02119-RWT)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luis Felipe Mangual, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Adam Kenneth Ake, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Mara Zusman Greenberg, 

Deborah A. Johnston, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Luis Felipe Mangual, Jr. seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012)

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Mangual has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 11.1

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing earnings available to common
shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period.

Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing the earnings available to
common shares by the weighted average number of common shares, common equivalent
shares and common shares assumed converted from potentially dilutive securities
outstanding during the period.

For purposes of computing diluted earnings per share, common equivalent shares
include the average number of common shares issuable upon the exercise of all
employee stock options, if dilutive, less the common shares which could have
been purchased at the average market price during the period with the assumed
proceeds, including the "windfall" tax benefits, from the exercise of the
options, awards and subscriptions.
STATE v. Eddie BLAND.

No. 513P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th day of September 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."
FULLER v. FULLER.

No. COA05-1634.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 6, 2007.

Certification March 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Harnett (00CVD2097).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of The Sports Authority, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 3, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, George
R. Mihalko, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

S/  GEORGE R. MIHALKO
    -----------------
    George R. Mihalko
    Vice Chairman,
    Chief Administrative Officer and
    Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial Officer)
**UN PUBLISHED**  UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6920** 

WARREN CHASE , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 01502

- CCB; 1:11

- cv - 01560

- CCB; 1:11

- cv - 01569

- CCB )

Submitted : September 13, 2011 Decided: September 16, 2011

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismis sed by un published per curiam opinion
. Warren Chase, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Warren Chase appeals the district court ’ s order denying Chase’s request for mandamus relief and dismis sing the action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Chase v. United States Dist. Ct. , Nos. 1:11

- cv - 01502

- CCB; 1:11

- cv - 01560

- CCB; 1:11

- cv 01569

- CCB (D. Md. June 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid t he decisional process.

DISMISSED
SPELL v. MILLS.

No. COA06-510.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Beaufort (05CVS1438).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
# Council Decision of 13 January 2014 appointing a Swedish member of the European Economic and Social Committee (2014/10/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 13 January 2014

# appointing a Swedish member of the European Economic and Social Committee

# (2014/10/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Swedish Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and                              Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015(1).

(2)A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of                              Ms Ellen NYGREN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Ms Lise-Lotte LENBERG is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the                     current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 13 January 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

D. Kourkoulas                            

1

OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification by the ChiefExecutive Officer**

**Relating to a Periodic ReportContaining Financial Statements**

 

I, Jeffrey A. Snider, Chief Executive Officer, ofPAULA Financial, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that:

 

(1)           TheCompany’s periodic report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30,2005 (the “Form 10-QSB”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Thefinancial statements and disclosures contained in the Form 10-QSB fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

*              *              *

 

 

CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

 
| /s/ Jeffrey A. Snider |                 |   |
|-----------------------|----------------------|--------|
| Jeffrey A. Snider     |                 |
|                  |
| Date:                 | August 12, 2005 |
|                       |                      |        |  |

 

1

----
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Stanley J. Talbi, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MetLife Life and Annuity Company of Connecticut;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 10, 2007       /s/ Stanley J. Talbi      Stanley J. Talbi    *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,727
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,412
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,470
<PP&E>                                          14,507
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,727
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,445
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,727
<SALES>                                         53,658
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,658
<CGS>                                           37,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,226
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,878
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42


</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 52/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 52/2013 of 22 January 2013 amending Annex XIb to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007            as regards semi-sparkling wine, aerated semi-sparkling wine and rectified concentrated grape must (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 52/2013                     

# of 22 January 2013

# amending Annex XIb to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards semi-sparkling wine, aerated semi-sparkling wine and                        rectified concentrated grape must (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation                                 of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001                                 and (EC) No 1234/2007.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          17,076
<SECURITIES>                                    20,096
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,172
<PP&E>                                             371
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,298
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,306
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,257
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,027
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,874)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,874)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,874)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 991/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 991/2013 of 15 October 2013 laying down form and content of the accounting information            to be submitted to the Commission for the purpose of the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and EAFRD as well as for monitoring            and forecasting purposes (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 991/2013                     

# of 15 October 2013

# laying down form and content of the accounting information to be submitted to the Commission for the purpose of the clearance                        of the accounts of the EAGF and EAFRD as well as for monitoring and forecasting purposes (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1067/2014 of 3 October 2014 laying down form and content of the accounting information                                 to be submitted to the Commission for the purpose of the clearance of the accounts of the EAGF and the EAFRD as well as for                                 monitoring and forecasting purposes.
STATE of North Carolina v. Daniel Marcus CORDRAY.

No. 288P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Paul M. James, III, Assistant Public Defender, for Daniel Cordray.

Robert Hargett, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 31st day of May 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
IN RE P.L.M.

COA06-1287.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 15, 2007.

Certification Date June 4, 2007.

Appeal from New Hanover (05J325, 05J326, 05J327, 05J328).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN RE S.L.M.

No. COA07-163.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (06JT350, 06JT351).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 19, 2014

p0916

Order 

Clerk

September 19, 2014

149537

SC: 149537

In re WANGLER/PASCHKE, Minors. COA: 318186

Sanilac CC Family Division:

07-035009-NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of In re Farris (Docket No. 147636) is pending on appeal before this Court and that 

the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to 

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in 

that case.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ROBERT PURYEAR,

Defendant BelowAppellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff BelowAppellee.

§

§ No. 40, 2018

§

§

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID 1410020161 (K)

§ 

§

Submitted: March 8, 2018

 Decided: May 15, 2018

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

O R D E R

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s 

motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below 

should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s decision adopting the 

Commissioner’s well-reasoned report dated September 20, 2017. There is no merit 

to the appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in the entry of his 2015 

guilty plea to continuous sexual abuse of a child and fourth degree rape.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
Exhibit 32.2








**CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**


**18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
A. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


By:
    /s/
      David A. JacksonChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      6, 2005








*A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight
Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.*




Back to Form 10-Q