alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.01

                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                           OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

     I, C. Robert Henrikson, the Chief Executive Officer of The Travelers Life
and Annuity Company (the "Company"), certify that (i) the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "Form 10-Q") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: August 12, 2005

                                          By: /s/ C. Robert Henrikson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                    C. Robert Henrikson
                                                  Chairman, President and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to The Travelers Life and Annuity Company and will be retained by
The Travelers Life and Annuity Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
                                        27
EXHIBIT 15

                   AWARENESS LETTER OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


MidAmerican Energy Company
Des Moines, Iowa

We have made a review, in accordance with standards  established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited consolidated interim
financial  information of MidAmerican  Energy Company and  subsidiaries  for the
three-month  and  nine-month  periods  ended  September  30,  2003 and 2002,  as
indicated  in our report dated November 3, 2003;  because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware  that our  report  referred  to above,  which is  included  in your
Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September  30,  2003,  is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-101800 on Form S-3.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report,  pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the  Securities  Act of  1933,  is not  considered  a part  of the  Registration
Statement  prepared  or  certified  by an  accountant  or a report  prepared  or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Des Moines, Iowa
November 5, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                           0000929454
<NAME>                          GLENBOROUGH REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
<CURRENCY>                      U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.000
<CASH>                          3,024
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   6,171
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                9,195
<PP&E>                          1,605,341
<DEPRECIATION>                  129,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,655,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           17,806
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     10
<COMMON>                        29
<OTHER-SE>                      717,069
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,655,860
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                128,392
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   41,847
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                37,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              32,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 16,933
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             16,933
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 (550)
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    16,383
<EPS-BASIC>                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.18



</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 807/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 807/2013 of 26 August 2013 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council            Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards the survey of prices of certain bovine animals on representative Union markets (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 807/2013                     

# of 26 August 2013

# laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards the survey of prices of                        certain bovine animals on representative Union markets (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1182 of 20 April 2017 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European                                 Parliament and of the Council as regards the Union scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcasses and as regards                                 the reporting of market prices of certain categories of carcasses and live animals.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                     STIRLING COOKE BROWN HOLDINGS LIMITED

           STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER ORDINARY SHARE

 (Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share
                                     data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 AS OF OR FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                                                          DECEMBER 31,
                                                          ------------------------------------------
                                                             1996            1997            1998
                                                          ----------      ----------      ----------
<S>                                                       <C>             <C>             <C>
Net income.............................................   $    9,918      $   12,993      $   16,018
                                                          ==========      ==========      ==========

BASIC
Number of shares:
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares out-
 standing..............................................    7,879,121       8,382,434       9,863,372
Weighted average treasury shares held..................      (67,227)       (143,396)        (49,271)
Shares issued in June 1997.............................      288,888         144,444              --
                                                          ----------      ----------      ----------
                                                           8,100,782       8,383,482       9,814,101
                                                          ==========      ==========      ==========
Net income per share...................................   $     1.22      $     1.55            1.63
                                                          ==========      ==========      ==========

DILUTED
Number of shares:
Weighted average number of Ordinary Shares out-
 standing..............................................    7,879,121       8,237,990       9,863,372
Weighted average treasury shares held..................      (67,227)       (143,396)        (49,271)
Shares issued in June 1997.............................      288,888         288,888
Incremental shares from assumed exercise of options....      205,828         131,991          26,058
                                                          ----------      ----------      ----------
                                                           8,306,610       8,515,473       9,840,159
                                                          ==========      ==========      ==========
Net income per share assuming dilution.................   $     1.19      $     1.53            1.63
                                                          ==========      ==========      ==========
</TABLE>

                                      60
<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                   
<S>                               <C>
<ARTICLE>                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                      1,000
                          
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 Dec-31-1997              
<PERIOD-START>                    Jan-01-1997              
<PERIOD-END>                      Mar-31-1997
<CASH>                            10        
<SECURITIES>                      2,266,006           
<RECEIVABLES>                     0           
<ALLOWANCES>                      0         
<INVENTORY>                       0           
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  0<F1>            
<PP&E>                            0 
<DEPRECIATION>                    0            
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    2,266,865           
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             0<F1>
<BONDS>                           2,111,914    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>             0           
<PREFERRED>                       0            
<COMMON>                          10             
<OTHER-SE>                        116,815           
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      2,266,865            
<SALES>                           0             
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  42,549             
<CGS>                             0       
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     0            
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  1,481            
<LOSS-PROVISION>                  600        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                38,974         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   1,494       
<INCOME-TAX>                      0          
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               1,494            
<DISCONTINUED>                    0            
<EXTRAORDINARY>                   0            
<CHANGES>                         0            
<NET-INCOME>                      1,494            
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     0            
<EPS-DILUTED>                     0            
<FN>                    
<F1>                    The Company's balance sheet is unclassified
</FN>
        
       

</TABLE>
FUCITO v. FRANCIS.

No. COA06-1237.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Caldwell (93CVD66).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Chad Evrist HERNDON.

No. 88P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Herndon.

Karen Long, Special Deputy Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 6th day of June 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of June 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-51378 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BOBBY HUTCHINSON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-02-CR-197-ALL-SS

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Bobby Hutchinson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). In response, Hutchinson has requested that alternate counsel be appointed. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, and counsel is excused for further responsibilities herein. Hutchinson’s motion for theNo. 02-51378 -2- appointment of alternate counsel is DENIED. The appeal is
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1994-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         1,711
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  916
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,627
<PP&E>                                         3,740,387
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,469,252)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,273,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,979
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,267,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,273,762
<SALES>                                        119,901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               119,908
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  56,960<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                43,735
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            43,735
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   43,735
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31 (a)
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 August 6, 2010/s/ Richard H. Smith

Chief Executive Officer
 49
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ROBERT PURYEAR,

Defendant Below

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below

Appellee. §

§ No. 40, 2018

§

§

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID 1410020161 ( K )

§

§

Submitted: March 8 , 2018

Decided: May 15 , 201 8

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VA UGHN

, Justices.

O R D E R

After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s

motion to affirm, and the record on appeal

, w e conclude that the judgment below

should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court ’s decision adopting the

Commissioner’s well

- reasoned report dated September 20 , 2017

. There is no merit

to the appellant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counse l in the entry of his 2015

guilty plea to continuous sexual abuse of a child and fourth degree rape.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
IN RE A.C.

No. COA06-1653.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04JT688, 05JT289).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 21

- 14491 Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,

versus COREY QUINN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:21

- cr

- 00166

- KKM

- AEP

- 2

____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-14491 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 12/19/2022 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 21

- 14491

Before N EWSOM , G RANT , and A NDERSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Darlene Calzon Barror , appointed counsel for Corey Quinn in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. C alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counse l’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED , and Quinn’s convictions and sentences

are AFFIRMED

. USCA11 Case: 21-14491 Document: 29-1 Date Filed: 12/19/2022 Page: 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Te xas

January 26, 2017

No. 04

- 16

- 00788

- CV

Danny ALEXANDER & Sarah Alexander,

Appellants

v.

AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SERVG. , Inc. as Servicer for Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Trustee for Soundview Home Loan Trust 2006

- OPT5, Asset

- Backed Certificates Series 2006

- OPT5,

Appellees

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV

- 12

- 0000281 Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The unopposed motion pro hac vice of non

- resident attorney, Joshua Tropper, seeking permission to participate in these proceedings on behalf of appellees is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of th e said court on this 26th day of January, 2017

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JONATHAN McALLISTER, Sr.,

 Plaintiff- Appellant,

 v.

PRESTON, Licensed Practitioner, Nurse at

ADC/ASPC Eyman-Meadows Unit,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-16672

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-02638-JAT

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 24, 2013** 

Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Jonathan McAllister, Sr., an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to comply with a court order his 42

FILED

AUG 05 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-16672

U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion. Pagtalunan v. Galaza,

291 F.3d 639, 640 (9th Cir. 2002). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing McAllister’s

action without prejudice after McAllister failed to comply with the district court’s

March 12, 2012 order to show cause in a timely manner. See id., 291 F.3d at 642-

43 (discussing factors for dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) and affirming

dismissal where three out of five factors supported it).

Because we affirm the district court’s dismissal under Rule 41(b), we do not

consider McAllister’s challenges to the district court’s interlocutory orders. See

Al-Torki v. Kaempen, 78 F.3d 1381, 1386 (9th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.