alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                           |                | Exhibit 99(a)
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -------------- | -------------
|HSBC Finance Corporation
HRSI Funding Inc. VI
Saks Credit Card Master Trust, Series 2001-2
|                                                                                           |                |              
|Original Class A Principal                                                                 | 333,000,000.00 |              
|Number of Class A Bonds (000's)                                                            | 333,000        |              
|Original Class B Principal                                                                 | 36,000,000.00  |              
|Number of Class B Bonds (000's)                                                            | 36,000         |              
|                                                                                           |                |              
|                                                                                           |                |              
|                                                                                           |                |              
|                                                                                           |                |              
|Distribution Date                                                                          |                | 2005 Total   
|                                                                                           |                |              
|CLASS A                                                                                    |                |              
|Class A Principal Distribution                                                             |                | 0.00         
|Class A Interest Distribution                                                              |                | 11,602,017.76
|                                                                                           |                |              
|CLASS B                                                                                    |                |              
|Class B Principal Distribution                                                             |                | 0.00         
|Class B Interest Distribution                                                              |                | 1,403,922.19 
|                                                                                           |                |
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

AK/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

BRUCE E. DUNBAR,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 08-30406

D.C. No. 2:00-cr-00045-RSL

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Robert S. Lasnik, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Bruce E. Dunbar appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

“motion for clarification of judgment.” We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

DEC 14 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
AK/Research 2 08-30406

Dunbar contends that the district court improperly delegated its authority to

schedule restitution payments to the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) by failing to

specify the precise amount of money the BOP was authorized to collect per month

as part of the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, thereby allowing BOP to

dictate the amount of restitution inmates are required to pay. This argument is

foreclosed. See United States v. Lemoine, 546 F.3d 1042, 1046 (9th Cir. 2008).

Dunbar also contends that the government acted vindictively by opposing

his motion for clarification of judgment. This argument lacks merit. See United

States v. Lopez, 474 F.3d 1208, 1211 (9th Cir. 2007).

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

A Dialogue with the Small Business Development Center (SBDC) National Advisory Board will take place at the Association of SBDCs National Conference in Baltimore, Maryland on Thursday, September 8, 2005, starting at 10:30 a.m. until noon. This session will take place at the Marriott Waterfront Hotel, 700 Aliceanna Street, Board Room, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The “Dialogue” session is an opportunity for state and regional SBDC Directors to discuss any issues (programmatic, policy, etc.) regarding the SBDC Program with the Board. 

                    Anyone wishing to attend must contact Erika Fischer, Senior Program Analyst, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Small                           ( print page 51400)                        Business Development Centers, 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, telephone (202) 205-7045 or fax (202) 481-0681.                 

Matthew K. Becker, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-17172 Filed 8-29-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# Council Decision of 28 January 2014 appointing a Danish member of the European Economic and Social Committee (2014/45/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 28 January 2014

# appointing a Danish member of the European Economic and Social Committee

# (2014/45/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Danish Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and                              Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015(1).

(2)A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of                              Ms Sinne CONAN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Anders LADEFOGED is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the                     current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

G. Stournaras                            

1

OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.
# The Firefighters' Pension Scheme (Amendment) Order (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2013 No. 85

Fire And Rescue Services

Pensions

# The Firefighters' Pension Scheme (Amendment) Order (Northern Ireland) 2013

Made

26th March 2013

Coming into operation

1st April 2013

The Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety, in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 10(1), (3), (4)                           and (5) of the Fire Services (Northern Ireland) Order 1984 F1, and now vested in it F2 and with the approval of the Department of Finance and Personnel in accordance with Article 10(1) of that Order makes the                           following Order:                        

F1S.I. 1984/1821 (N.I. 11) Article 10(5) was amended by S.I. 1998/1549 (N.I.11) Article 4. Article 10 was continued by S.I.2006/1254 (N.I.9) Article 60(1) and (2)

F2See S.R. 1999 No. 481 Article 6(c) and Schedule 4, Part III

## Citation and commencementN.I.

1.  This Order may be cited as the Firefighters' Pension Scheme (Amendment) Order (Northern Ireland) 2013 and shall come into                     operation on 1st April 2013.                  

## Amendment of the Firefighters' Pension Scheme Order (Northern Ireland) 2007N.I.

2.  The Annex to the Firefighters' Pension Scheme Order (Northern Ireland) 2007 F3 (in which the Firefighters' Pension Scheme (Northern Ireland) is set out), shall be amended in accordance with article 3.                  

F3S.R. 2007 No. 144 relevant amendment is SR 2012 No. 161

## 

3.  In Schedule 7 for the table in paragraph 3 of Part A1 (pension contributions) substitute—                  

Sealed with the Official Seal of the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety on 26th March 2013.

L.S.

Bernie Stuart

 A senior officer of the

 Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety

The Department of Finance and Personnel approves this Order.

Sealed with the Official Seal of the Department of Finance and Personnel on 26th March 2013.

L.S.

Bill Pauley

 A senior officer of the

 Department of Finance and Personnel

## Explanatory Note

(This note is not part of the Order)

This Order further amends the Firefighters' Pension Scheme Order (Northern Ireland) 2007.

The amendment is to provide a different rate for pension contributions payable by members of the Firefighters' Pension Scheme                        which increase according to the amount of pensionable pay which the member receives. The contribution rates are specified                        in the Table.                     

In addition, a new band of pensionable pay has been created so that those firefighters who earn more than £15,000 and up to                        and including £21,000 will pay a lower rate than those earning more than £21,000 and up to and including £30,000.
STATE v. BLACKMON.

No. COA06-1656.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 21, 2007.

Certification Date September 10, 2007.

Appeal from Buncombe (05CRS63585).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
ROBBINS v. PERRITT.

No. 399P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Perritt.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of August 2007 by Plaintiff for an order directing Mr. Brad A. Perritt, Manager of Red Unit, Scotland Correctional Institution, to assist the petitioner in the preparation and presentation of his criminal cases to the courts:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of August 2007."
JEFFREY & CO. v. EVERETT.

No. 497P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

E.C. Cradle, Pro Se, for Jeffrey & Company.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of September 2006 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of March 2007."
```

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 51335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17228]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

Order No. 1408

Expansion Of Foreign-Trade Zone 8, Toledo, Ohio, Area

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority, grantee of 
Foreign-Trade Zone 8, submitted an application to the Board for 
authority to expand FTZ 8 to include a site (Site 6 - 86 acres) at the 
Greenbelt Development Park located in Toledo, Ohio, within the Toledo/
Sandusky Customs port of entry (FTZ Docket 43-2004; filed 9/20/04);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (69 FR 57263, 9/24/04) and the application has been processed 
pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the 
public interest;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand FTZ 8 is approved, subject to the Act and 
the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28, and subject to an 
initial five-year time limit (to August 31, 2010) with extension 
available upon review.
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 23rd day of August 2005.

Joseph A. Spetrini,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, 
Alternate Chairman Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Dennis Puccinelli,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-17228 Filed 8-29-05; 8:45 am]
Billing Code: 3510-DS-S
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3331 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3331

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require that the payment 
  of the manufacturers' excise tax on recreational equipment be paid 
                               quarterly.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 24 (legislative day, July 23), 2008

 Mr. Baucus (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require that the payment 
  of the manufacturers' excise tax on recreational equipment be paid 
                               quarterly.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Firearms Fairness and Affordability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF MANUFACTURERS' EXCISE TAX ON RECREATIONAL 
              EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (d) of section 6302 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to mode or time of collection) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(d) Time for Payment of Manufacturers' Excise Tax on Recreational 
Equipment.--The taxes imposed by subchapter D of chapter 32 of this 
title (relating to taxes on recreational equipment) shall be due and 
payable on the date for filing the return for such taxes.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to articles sold by the manufacturer, producer, or importer after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Amended Form of Two-Year Restricted Stock Award Agreement for Grants



 EXHIBIT 10.8 
  
 STANDARD TERMS OF AWARDS GRANTED
UNDER 
 THE TWO YEAR RESTRICTED STOCK
PROGRAM (“PROGRAM”) 
 OF THE 2004 SYPRIS
EQUITY PLAN (“PLAN”) 
  
 1. Awards – All “Awards” granted under this Program will be Restricted Shares subject to, and governed by, the terms of the Plan, this Program and a valid, executed Award Agreement. 
  
 2. Shares – Initially, each “Restricted Share” is one Share of the
Common Stock (subject to adjustments per the Plan) which is subject to forfeiture before its Vesting Date, as set forth herein. Shares will be held by the Company until their Vesting Dates, and physically distributed to the Participant thereafter,
with any legends required by applicable Rules. Participants may vote, and receive (subject to applicable Rules) cash dividends on, unvested Shares. 
  
 3. Taxes – The Participant must arrange for tax withholding in accordance with applicable Rules, to the satisfaction of the Committee, or immediately
surrender then-vested Shares of equivalent market value. 
  
 4. Vesting
– One hundred percent of the Award shall vest on the second anniversary of the Grant Date (the “Vesting Date”), unless forfeited before such Vesting Date; provided that in the event of death, all unvested Awards will be
immediately vested. 
  
 5. Forfeiture – Each Restricted Share will
terminate, expire and be forfeited as provided in Article V of the Plan. (The Committee has sole discretion to determine whether a demotion is a “termination” of employment.) 
  
 6. Leaves of Absence – The Committee may in its discretion treat all or any portion of any period during which a Participant is
on military or on an approved leave of absence as a period of employment for purposes of the accrual of rights hereunder. Retiring after age 65 or qualifying to receive long-term disability benefits under the Company’s then-current policies
shall be approved leaves of absence. 
  
 7. No Other Rights –
The Awards include no other rights beyond those expressly provided in the Plan, this Program or the Award Agreement. Awards are non-assignable and non-transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution, unless otherwise approved by
the Committee. 
  
 8. Definitions – Unless otherwise specified, all
capitalized terms herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Plan or in the Award Agreement.
Robert SARTORI v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS North Carolina Industrial Commission.

No. 579P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Robert Allen Sartori, Pro Se.

Melody R. Hairston, Associate Attorney General, for NC Dept. of Corrections.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 8th day of November 2006 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, NC Industrial Commission County:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in Conference this the 8th day of March 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1173/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1173/2013 of 19 November 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1173/2013                     

# of 19 November 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
FILED INCOURTGF APPEALS

12lh Coin of Appeals District

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

FILE-COPY

12/30/2015 COA No. 12-15-00213-CR

CORDERO-VARELA, JORGE Tr. Ct. No. 114-0766-12 PD-1382-15

The appellant's pro se petition for discretionary review has this day been received

and filed.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

PAM ESTES

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
HAILEY v. TERMINIX CO. OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.

No. COA06-675.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the New Hanover (05CVS1546).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT
23.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 16, 2009,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of PST Eletrônica S.A.
included in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, in the
following Registration Statements:





Registration Number
                  
                  Description of Registration
      Statement333-149436
                  
                  Form
      S-8 – Stoneridge, Inc. Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive
      Plan333-127017
                  
                  Form
      S-8 – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Restricted Shares
Plan333-96953
                  
                  Form
      S-8 – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Share Option Plan333-72176
                  
                  Form
      S-8 – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Share Option
  Plan





Campinas,
Brazil


March 11,
2009





ERNST
& YOUNG


Auditores
Independentes S.S.


CRC
2SP015199/O-6-S-AM


/s/ José
Antonio de A. Navarrete


José
Antonio de A. Navarrete


Accountant
CRC1SP198698/O-4-S-AM