alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 50407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16957]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Joint Research and Development Program for the 
Advancement of In Situ Bioremediation Technologies

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 1, 2005, pursuant section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Joint Research and Development 
Program for the Advancement of In Situ Bioremediation Technologies 
(``Bioremediation Consortium'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were 
filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the 
recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, Honeywell International Inc., Phoenix, AZ 
has been added as a party to this venture. Also, W.S. Atkins 
Consultants Ltd., Epsom, United Kingdom has withdrawn as a party to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Bioremediation Consortium intends to 
file additional written notification disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On March 11, 2005, Bioremediation Consortium filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on April 19, 2005 (70 FR 20400).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-16957 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00248-CV

In re Lazy W Conservation District

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 

Relator’s Opposed Motion for Emergency Stay is also denied.

__________________________________________

Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Filed: June 9, 2021
Exhibit 10.2

                             FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
                              CLUBCORP STOCK TRUST

     Amendment made effective July 21, 1998, by ClubCorp International, Inc.,
formerly Club Corporation International (the "Company").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:
                              - - - - - - - - - -

     WHEREAS, the Company maintains the ClubCorp Stock Investment Plan  and the
ClubCorp Stock Trust ("Trust"); and

     WHEREAS, effective July 21, 1998, the Company changed its name from Club
Corporation International to ClubCorp International, Inc.; and

     WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Trust to change the name of
the Company as defined therein, from Club Corporation International to ClubCorp
International, Inc., effective as of the date the Company changed its name; and

     WHEREAS, the Trust may be amended by the Company pursuant to the provisions
of Article X of the Trust, and the Company desires to amend the Trust.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Trust is amended as follows, effective as set forth
above:

1.     Existing Section 2.5 is deleted in its entirety, and the following is
substituted in its place:

"2.5 "Company" means ClubCorp International, Inc. or its successor."


                         CLUBCORP INTERNATIONAL, INC.


Date:  September 21, 1998            By:  /s/Kim S. Besse
       ------------------                 ---------------

                              TRUSTEES:

Date:  September 21, 1998            /s/Albert Chew
       ------------------            --------------

Date:  October 1, 1998               /s/James E. Maser
       ---------------               -----------------

Date:  October 1, 1998               /s/Douglas Howe
       ---------------               ---------------
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 8/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 8/2013 of 8 January 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 8/2013                     

# of 8 January 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 January 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Opinion issued April 16, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01

- 15

- 00265

- CV

——————————— SW SERVICE CENTER 1, L.P. AND SW SERVICE CENTER 2, L.P. , Appella nt s V.
HARRIS COUNTY APPRAI SAL DISTRICT , Appell e e

On Appeal from the 295th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2011

- 56200

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants, SW Service Center 1, L.P. and SW Service Center 2, L.P., ha ve
filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. No opinion has issued.
Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.2 PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                       InKine Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of InKine Pharmaceutical
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Leonard S. Jacob, M.D., Ph.D., Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Date: August 14, 2002                       /s/ Leonard S. Jacob, M.D., Ph.D.
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Leonard S. Jacob, M.D., Ph.D.
                                            Chairman of the Board and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
IN RE M.M.

No. COA07-513.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (06JT915, 06JT916, 06JT917, 06JT0918).

Case reported without published opinion Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.4
			Independent Accountants' Report



The Board of Directors
First North American National Bank:


We have examined management's assertion about First North American National
Bank's (FNANB) compliance, as Servicer, with Article III, subsection 3.4(c) and
sections 3.2, 4.1 and 8.8 of the Amended and Restated Master Pooling and
Servicing Agreement, dated December 31, 2001, between FNANB, as Servicer, D.C.
Funding International, Inc., as Transferor, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee
for the period March 1, 2003 through November 17, 2003 and compliance, with the
servicing requirements in subsection 2.02(b) of the Interim Servicing Agreement
(the ISA) dated November 18, 2003 between First North American National Bank,
as Interim Servicer, Circuit City Stores, Inc. and Fleet Credit Card Services,
L.P., as Principal, with regards to Article III, subsection 3.4(c) and sections
3.2 and 8.8 of the Second Amended and Restated Master Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated November 18, 2003 between Fleet Bank (RI), National Association,
as Transferor and Servicer, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, for the period
November 18, 2003 through February 29, 2004, included in the accompanying
Management Report. Management is responsible for FNANB's compliance with those
requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about FNANB's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about FNANB's
compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our opinion does not provide a
legal determination on FNANB's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that First North American National Bank
complied with the requirements of the aforementioned subsections and sections
of the Agreements for the aforementioned periods is fairly stated, in all
material respects.



/s/ KPMG LLP
------------
KPMG LLP

April 19, 2004
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6894

TONY A. HAWKINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SIDNEY HARKLEROAD,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

DEAN R. WALKER,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,

Chief District Judge. (CA-01-161-5-2-MU)

Submitted: November 24, 2004 Decided: January 3, 2005

Before TRAXLER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony A. Hawkins, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*To the extent that Hawkins’ motion could have been construed

as a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), we note he did not satisfy

the criteria for relief under that rule. Further, to the extent

Hawkins’ appeal could be construed as a motion seeking

authorization under 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000) to file a successive 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition, Hawkins failed to demonstrate he is

entitled to such authorization. 

- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Tony A. Hawkins appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion he labeled as filed under Rule 61 of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court.* See Hawkins v. Walker, No. CA-01-161-5-2-MU

(W.D.N.C. May 10, 2004). We grant Hawkins’ motion to proceed in

forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2010

0322 

# Order

March 29, 2010

140315

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140315 COA: 286329 Oakland CC: 08-219177-FH ZACHERY TYRONE RODGERS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 12, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 10.2 to Hecla Mining Company Form 10-Q dated June 30, 2005









EXHIBIT 10.2  



Written description of objectives for the 2005-2007 plan period under the

Hecla Mining Company Executive and Senior Management Long-Term Performance Payment Plan 



        The following is a
description of certain terms of the Hecla Mining Company Executive and Senior Management Long-Term Performance Payment Plan (the
“Plan”) provided pursuant to paragraph (b)(10)(iii) of Item 601 of Regulation S-K, which requires a written
description of material terms and conditions of a compensatory plan not contained in a formal document. 



2005-2007 Plan Period  



Performance Targets  



        In general, there should be a
continued focus on resource growth and cash contribution generation for the 2005-2007 plan period. More emphasis will be placed on
resource growth for the plan period by weighting resource growth 75% and cash contribution 25% in determining the value of the
incentive award at the conclusion of the 2005-2007 period. 



        Performance targets have been
established for resource growth (i.e. gold, silver and gold equivalent resources) and cash contribution generation from the
Company’s resources. The goal is to incentivize management to focus on production and cost reduction. In addition, the cash
contribution component encourages management to focus on high quality resource additions that can be converted to production.




Performance Unit Awards  



        The Board assigns performance
units at the beginning of each three-year plan period. Assuming a nominal value of $100 per performance unit, the following people
are awarded performance units for the 2005-2007 plan period: 


	Position 	  	Incumbent 	 
	CEO	 	Baker	 
	CFO	 	Walde	 
	VP – Explor/Strategy	 	Atkinson	 
	VP – Bus Dev	 	Callahan	 
	VP – N.A. Ops	 	Clayton	 
	VP – IR	 	Veltkamp	 




















Performance Award Value  



        Performance unit value is
based upon performance as determined by the Board of Directors. The two primary objectives are related to resource and cash
contribution growth. 



        Assuming 100% of the target
resource level is reached and 100% of the cash contribution target is reached, the value of each unit would be $100.00. However,
the value of performance units can range between $0 and $200, depending upon performance as determined by the Board of Directors.
Exhibit 32(1)



I, Gregory Cuneo, Chief Executive Officer of DualStar  Technologies  Corporation
(the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending
          December 31, 2003 (the  "Quarterly  Report")  fully  complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

     2.   The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operations of the Company.

                                           DUALSTAR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
                                                    (Registrant)

                                           By: /s/  GREGORY CUNEO
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Gregory Cuneo
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


         Dated:   February 17, 2004
STATE v. WOOD.

No. COA06-978.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Harnett (04CRS55638, 04CRS55736).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 164 (Thursday, August 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16877]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Boston Harbor Islands Advisory Council; Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) that the Boston Harbor Islands Advisory 
Council will meet on Wednesday, September 7, 2005. The meeting will 
convene at 6 p.m. at the New England Aquarium Conference Center, 
Central Wharf, Boston, MA.
    The Advisory Council was appointed by the Director of National Park 
Service pursuant to Public Law 104-333. The 28 members represent 
business, educational/cultural, community and environmental entities; 
municipalities surrounding Boston Harbor; Boston Harbor advocates; and 
Native American interests. The purpose of the Council is to advise and 
make recommendations to the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership with 
respect to the development and implementation of a management plan and 
the operations of the Boston Harbor Islands national park area.
    The Agenda for this meeting is as follows:

1. Call to Order, Introductions of Advisory Council members present
2. Review and approval of minutes of the June meeting
3. Youth Program Report
4. Peddocks Island-Fort Andrews Preservation and Adaptive Reuse Project
5. Review of Summer Season
6. Report from the NPS
7. Public Comment
8. Next Meetings
9. Adjourn

    The meeting is open to the public. Further information concerning 
Council meetings may be obtained from the Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Council or file written statements. Such requests should be made at 
least seven days prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, Boston Harbor 
Islands NRA, 408 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA 02110, telephone (617) 
223-8667.

    Dated: July 19, 2005.
Bruce Jacobson,
Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA.
[FR Doc. 05-16877 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB as of and for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>               NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                 OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                            17,774
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  25,280
<PP&E>                           527,099
<DEPRECIATION>                    44,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   593,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            458,330
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                          15,902
<OTHER-SE>                      (102,091)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     593,641
<SALES>                          109,748
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 109,748
<CGS>                            111,923
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  1,193,487
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  57,810
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                80,578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        0
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (1,252,219)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    1,253
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                  (1,252,219)
<EPS-BASIC>                       (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0

</TABLE>