alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013127EN.01000101.xml

| 9.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 127/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 127/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 421/2013

of 7 May 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Porc du Sud-Ouest (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Porc du Sud-Ouest’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Porc du Sud-Ouest’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 162, 8.6.2012, p.20

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.1.   Fresh meat (and offal)

FRANCE

Porc du Sud-Ouest (PGI)

---
# Commission Implementing Decision of 19 August 2013 concerning certain protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic            avian influenza of subtype H7N7 in Italy (notified under document C(2013) 5521) (Only the Italian text is authentic) (Text            with EEA relevance) (2013/439/EU) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 19 August 2013

# concerning certain protective measures in relation to highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H7N7 in Italy

# (notified under document C(2013) 5521)

# (Only the Italian text is authentic)

# (Text with EEA relevance)

# (2013/439/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by 2013/443/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 27 August 2013 concerning certain protective measures in relation to highly                                 pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H7N7 in Italy including the establishment of further restricted zones and repealing                                 Implementing Decision 2013/439/EU (notified under document C(2013) 5623) Text with EEA relevance.
STATE EX REL. NEWTON v. SCARBOROUGH.

No. COA07-111.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 16, 2007.

Certification Date November 5, 2007.

Appeal from Durham (04CVS3393).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Council Decision 2014/751/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/751/CFSP of 30 October 2014 amending Decision 2010/573/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against            the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/751/CFSP                     

# of 30 October 2014

# amending Decision 2010/573/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region of the                        Republic of Moldova                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)On 27 September 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/573/CFSP(1).

(2)On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/573/CFSP, the restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian region                              of the Republic of Moldova should be extended until 31 October 2015.

(3)Decision 2010/573/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Article 4(2) of Decision 2010/573/CFSP is hereby replaced by the following:

‘2.This Decision shall apply until 31 October 2015. It shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed or amended, as                           appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

Council Decision 2010/573/CFSP of 27 September 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the leadership of the Transnistrian                              region of the Republic of Moldova (OJ L 253, 28.9.2010, p. 54).
#### Anthony P. Hoerner et al., Respondents, v Chrysler Financial Company, L.L.C., et al., Appellants, and Mary P. Rossi, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[801 NYS2d 223]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered July 9, 2004. The judgment, upon a jury verdict, dismissed the complaint and the cross claim of defendants Chrysler Financial Company, L.L.C., Douglas J. Jank and Jay B. Jank against defendant Mary P Rossi.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Hoerner v Chrysler Fin. Co.*([appeal No. 3] 21 AD3d 1254 [2005]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Hayes, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.3 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, P. Chrisman Iribe, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 of Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 12, 2004 /s/ P. CHRISMAN IRIBEP. Chrisman IribePresidentSelkirk Cogen Funding Corporation
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 24, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00498

- CR

EX PARTE Matthew Jamal JACKSON

Original Habeas Corp us Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

Ja son Pulliam , Justice

On September 21, 2015, relator filed a “notice of appeal” with respect to this original

habeas corpus proceeding which we will construe as a motion for rehearing. The panel has

considered the motion and it is DENIED.

It is so ORDER ED on September 24, 2015

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________ ________________ __

Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014CR0148 , styled The State of Texas v. Matthew Jamal Jackson

, pending in the 379th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                       FIRST NORTH AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK

                     --------------------------------------

                         FNANB CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST
                     --------------------------------------


         The  undersigned,  a duly  authorized  representative  of  First  North
American  National Bank, as Servicer (the  "Servicer"),  pursuant to the Amended
and Restated  Master  Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  dated as of December 31,
2001 (as such  agreement may have been,  or may, from time to time be,  amended,
supplemented  or otherwise  modified,  the "Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement"),
among DC Funding  International,  Inc.,  as  Transferor,  First  North  American
National  Bank,  as  Transferor  under the Prior  Agreement  (as  defined in the
Pooling and Servicing  Agreement)  and as Servicer,  and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as
Trustee  (successor  in  such  capacity  to  First  Union  National  Bank)  (the
"Trustee"),  does  hereby  certify  to the  best of his or her  knowledge  after
reasonable investigation that:


         1. Capitalized  terms used  in this  certificate  have their respective
meanings set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

         2. The Servicer is as of the date hereof the Servicer under the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement.

         3. The undersigned is a Servicing Officer.

         4. This certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Pooling
and Servicing Agreement.

         5. A review of the  activities  of the Servicer  during the Fiscal Year
ended February 28, 2002 and of its  performance  under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement was made under the supervision of the undersigned.

         6. Based on such review,  to the best of the  undersigned's  knowledge,
the  Servicer  has fully  performed  all its  obligations  under the Pooling and
Servicing  Agreement  throughout  such Fiscal Year and no event which,  with the
giving of notice or passage of time or both, would constitute a Servicer Default
has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 7 below.

         7. The  following is a description  of each Servicer  Default under the
provisions of the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement  known to the  undersigned to
have occurred  during the Fiscal Year ended February 28, 2002,  which sets forth
in detail the (i) nature of each such Servicer Default, (ii) the action taken by
the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such Servicer Default and (iii) the current
status of each such Servicer Default: Not applicable.

         IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned,  a duly  authorized  Servicing
Officer, has duly executed this certificate this 29th day of May, 2002.



                              /s/ Philip J. Dunn
                              -------------------------------
                              Name: Philip J. Dunn
                              Title: Vice President
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5767 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Governors 

of the Federal Reserve System from proposing, prescribing, or implementing any regulation under subchapter IV of chapter 53 of title 31, 

United States Code, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2008 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself and Mr. PAUL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board 

of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from proposing, prescribing, or implementing any regulation 

under subchapter IV of chapter 53 of title 31, United 

States Code, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION. 

4 The Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Gov5 ernors of the Federal Reserve System, whether acting 

6 jointly or separately, may not propose, prescribe, or imple7 ment any regulation under subchapter IV of chapter 53 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5767 IH

1 of title 31, United States Code, or otherwise give effect 

2 to such subchapter or any such regulation, including the 

3 proposed regulations published in the Federal Register on 

4 October 4, 2007. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BUSINESS
OBJECTS S.A. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          45,377
<SECURITIES>                                     8,240
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,312
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,719
<INVENTORY>                                        602
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,530
<PP&E>                                          22,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,856
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 106,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,147
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,112
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   106,837
<SALES>                                         39,552
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,552
<CGS>                                            6,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (462)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,482
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,428
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,980
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,980
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.11
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Louis Charriez, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 851]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 5, 2000 *(People v Charriez,*273 AD2d 249 [2000]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 5, 1998.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz, 2*NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., H. Miller, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51848-51849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employee Benefits Security Administration


Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and Pension Benefit Plans 
Working Group on Improving Plan Communications for Health and Welfare 
Plan Participants; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 512 of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. 1142, the 
Working Group assigned by the Advisory Council on Employee Welfare and 
Pension Benefit Plans to study the issue of improving

[[Page 51849]]

plan communications for health and welfare plan participants will hold 
an open public meeting on September 21, 2005.
    The session will take place in room S 4215 B-C, U.S. Department of 
Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. The purpose 
of the open meeting, which will run from 9 a.m. to approximately 4 
p.m., with a one hour break for lunch, is for Working Group members to 
hear testimony from invited witnesses. The Working Group will inquire 
whether plan participants understand benefits under health and welfare 
plans and whether the existing required communication tools (e.g., SPD, 
SAR, claims procedure rules) are accomplishing the original goal of 
full disclosure.
    Organizations or members of the public wishing to submit a written 
statement pertaining to the topic may do so by submitting 25 copies on 
or before September 14, 2005 to Larry Good, Executive Secretary, ERISA 
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of Labor, Suite N-5623, 200 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. Statements also may be 
submitted electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f7870707b31737e6d6d665f7b707331787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94f3fbfbf0baf8f5e6e6edd4f0fbf8baf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>. Statements received on 
or before September 14, 2005 will be included in the record of the 
meeting. Individuals or representatives of organizations wishing to 
address the Working Group should forward their requests to the 
Executive Secretary or telephone (202) 693-8668. Oral presentations 
will be limited to 20 minutes, time permitting, but an extended 
statement may be submitted for the record. Individuals with 
disabilities who need special accommodations should contact Larry Good 
by September 14 at the address indicated.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 25th day of August, 2005.
Ann L. Combs,
Assistant Secretary, Employee Benefits Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-17312 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
David J. WARD, Employee v. FLOORS PERFECT, Employer Penn National Insurance, Carrier.

No. 339A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

George W. Lennon, Raleigh, for David Ward.

Zachary C. Bolen, Raleigh, for Floors Perfect, et al.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 645 S.E.2d 109.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiff on the 13th day of July 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Plaintiff's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
NOTE
  Company WACHOVIA
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Lender Credit Agreement
 Section 2.04(f)
   [Remainder of page left blank intentionally; signature page follows.]




---



##### 



SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC.By:
    /s/ DAVID P. COSPERName:
    David P. CosperTitle:
    Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



LOANS AND PAYMENTS WITH RESPECT THERETO
 Amount ofPrincipal or
    
    OutstandingEnd of
    
    Interest
    
    PrincipalType of
    
    Amount of
    
    Interest
    
    Paid This
    
    Balance
    
    NotationDate
    
    Loan Made
    
    Loan Made
    
    Period
    
    Date
    
    This Date
    
    Made By