alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
2000 FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>  0001043225
<NAME> Advanced Engine Technologies Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,026,990
<SECURITIES>                                        00
<RECEIVABLES>                                       00
<ALLOWANCES>                                        00
<INVENTORY>                                         00
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,075,758
<PP&E>                                          87,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,537,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,359
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,950
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,394,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,537,703
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,704
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,241,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,170,657)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,170,657)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,170,657)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.10)



</TABLE>
STATE v. PATTON.

No. COA06-1710.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Henderson (05CRS6239, 05CRS6240, 05CRS6241, 05CRS6242).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. WELCH.

No. COA07-367.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (06CRS565, 06CRS52524).

Case reported without published opinion No error.
CONSENT OF PETER G. FOLK, P. ENG.



I consent to the reference to under the caption "Experts" and to the use of my Technical Report entitled Report on the Jinniushan Gold Project, Yuanling County, Hunan Province, China dated December 28, 2006 (the Report), prepared in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 in the Annual Registration Statement (Form 20-F) of Minco Gold Corporation (formerly Mining & Metals Corporation) (the Company).



I have read the Annual Registration Statement (Form 20-F), the National Instrument 43-101 (the "Instrument"), the Companion Policy 43-101CP, and Form 43-101F1 (the "Form 43-101F1"), and confirm that:



(a)

I have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information contained in the Annual Registration Statement (Form 20-F) derived from The Report or that is within my knowledge as a result of the investigations and enquiries made by me in connection with the preparation of the Report;



(b)

the Report complies with the requirements of the Instrument and Form 43-101F1.



Further, I hereby confirm my consent to the Company's use of the Annual Registration Statement (Form 20-F) for its regulatory filing purposes and its disclosure to the public.



Dated this 29th day of June, 2007







[ex142002.jpg]                                                            
[ex142001.jpg]



Signature of Qualified Person

______________________

Peter G. Folk, P.Eng.

Seal of Qualified Person
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-29758 

06-FEB-2012 

01:28 PM 

NO. SCWC-29758
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
 

IN THE INTEREST OF D.Q.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(ICA NO. 29758; FC-J NO. 0081885)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
 

Petitioner’s application for writ of certiorari, filed 

on January 5, 2012, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 6, 2012. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. 

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
 

Stuart N. Fujioka


for petitioner on


the application
IN RE S.F.

No. COA06-297

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Polk (03J23).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Lucas Theodoro BORGES.

No. 282P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Borges.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 644 S.E.2d 250.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th day of June 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 440/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 440/2013 of 13 May 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 440/2013                     

# of 13 May 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 May 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. WARREN.

No. COA07-220.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from Halifax (06CRS52077, 06CRS52083).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**650 CA 11-00301**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, LINDLEY, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ.

CITY OF SYRACUSE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
WILLIAM OSUCHOWSKI, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

JUANITA PEREZ WILLIAMS, CORPORATION COUNSEL, SYRACUSE (NANCY J. LARSON OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
ZIMMER LAW OFFICE, PLLC, SYRACUSE (KIMBERLY M. ZIMMER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Onondaga County Court (William D. Walsh, J.), entered April 8, 2010. The order affirmed orders of the Syracuse City Court (James H. Cecile, J.), entered May 7, 2008 and October 20, 2008, which, inter alia, granted the petitions in part.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at County Court.

Entered: June 10, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
STATE v. LIPSCOMB.

No. COA05-1023.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Gaston (04CRS23681, 04CRS23682, 04CRS64320, 04CRS64321, 04CRS64322, 04CRS64323, 04CRS64324, 04CRS64325)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3134 

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to require energy commodities to 

be traded only on regulated markets, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2008 

Mr. NELSON of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to require energy 

commodities to be traded only on regulated markets, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REGULATION OF ENERGY COMMODITIES. 

4 (a) DEFINITIONS.—Section 1a of the Commodity Ex5 change Act (7 U.S.C. 1a) is amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (13) through 

7 (34) as paragraphs (14) through (35), respectively; 

8 (2) by inserting after paragraph (12) the fol9 lowing: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 3134 IS

1 ‘‘(13) ENERGY COMMODITY.—The term ‘energy 

2 commodity’ includes— 

3 ‘‘(A) crude oil; 

4 ‘‘(B) natural gas; 

5 ‘‘(C) heating oil; 

6 ‘‘(D) gasoline; 

7 ‘‘(E) metals; 

8 ‘‘(F) construction materials; 

9 ‘‘(G) propane; and 

10 ‘‘(H) other fuel oils.’’; and 

11 (3) by striking paragraph (15) (as redesignated 

12 by paragraph (1)) and inserting the following: 

13 ‘‘(15) EXEMPT COMMODITY.—The term ‘exempt 

14 commodity’ means a commodity that is not— 

15 ‘‘(A) an agricultural commodity; 

16 ‘‘(B) an energy commodity; or 

17 ‘‘(C) an excluded commodity.’’. 

18 (b) CURRENT AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES.—Sec19 tion 5(e)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 

20 7(e)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘agricultural commodity 

21 enumerated in section 1a(4)’’ and inserting ‘‘agricultural 

22 commodity or an energy commodity’’. 

23 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•S 3134 IS

1 (1) Section 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(II)(cc) of the Com2 modity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 

3 2(c)(2)(B)(i)(II)(cc)) is amended— 

4 (A) in subitem (AA), by striking ‘‘section 

5 1a(20)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1a(21)’’; and 

6 (B) in subitem (BB), by striking ‘‘section 

7 1a(20)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1a(21)’’. 

8 (2) Section 13106(b)(1) of the Food, Conserva9 tion, and Energy Act of 2008 is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘section 1a(32)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1a’’. 

11 (3) Section 402 of the Legal Certainty for 

12 Bank Products Act of 2000 (7 U.S.C. 27) is amend13 ed— 

14 (A) in subsection (a)(7), by striking ‘‘sec15 tion 1a(20)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1a’’; and 

16 (B) in subsection (d)— 

17 (i) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking 

18 ‘‘section 1a(33)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 

19 1a’’; and 

20 (ii) in paragraph (2)(D), by striking 

21 ‘‘section 1a(13)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 

22 1a’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Colden Aujuai COLLINS.

No. 140P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

Colden A. Collins, Pro Se.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th day of August 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Hyde County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."
STATE v. Arthur O. ARMSTRONG.

No. 545P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Patricia A. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*119The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of February 2007 by Defendant for "Petition for Rehearing":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vivian
Chu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Vivian Chu
Chief Financial Officer
April 14, 2004













A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be
retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6431
CARLTON AUR, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-97- 3635-L) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: June 3, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carlton Aur, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard B ruce Rosenblatt, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Aur v. Maryland Parole Comm'n , No. CA-97-3635-L (D. Md. Feb. 25, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Man Keung Wai, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Man Keung Wai      
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 29, 2013         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          63,283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,010,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,869
<INVENTORY>                                  1,844,803
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,938,208
<PP&E>                                         829,560
<DEPRECIATION>                                 728,268
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,187,030
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,768,027
<BONDS>                                         45,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,684
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,363,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,187,030
<SALES>                                      3,482,264
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,482,264
<CGS>                                        1,920,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,251,924
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               818,781
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             139,215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                272,344
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            272,344
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   272,344
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
# The Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) Regulations 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

E+W+S

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 386

Social Security

# The Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) Regulations 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

25th February 2013

Coming into force

29th April 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Instrument revoked (16.6.2014) by The Universal Credit (Transitional Provisions) Regulations 2014 (S.I. 2014/1230), **reg. 3(1)** (with reg. 3(2)-(4))
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,159
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,336
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,348,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                 101,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,459,744
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        668,904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     542,684
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,459,744
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,421
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   32,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,781
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,781
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    17,781
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
        

</TABLE>