alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1167/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1167/2013 of 18 November 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1167/2013                     

# of 18 November 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.1

     CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Ivan Zweig, CEO of the Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mailkey Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

        a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Dated: June 29, 2005                   /s/   Ivan Zweig
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       By: Ivan Zweig
                                       Its:  Chief Executive Officer, Director
IN RE Z.R.G.

No. COA07-120.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (06J562).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of The Travelers Life and Annuity Company and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000929498
<NAME> THE TRAVELERS LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 968,021
<CASH>                                               1
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,172,445
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                726,788
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,038,668
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     346,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,172,445
<PREMIUMS>                                       5,261
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             67,397
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (16,870)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   9,698
<BENEFITS>                                      40,420
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      6,312
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,754
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,516
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,238
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,238
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5674 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5674

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the Bureau of Prisons 
  to provide secure storage areas in prison facilities for employees 
                     authorized to carry a firearm.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 1, 2008

Mr. Meek of Florida (for himself, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, and Mr. Ellsworth) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the Bureau of Prisons 
  to provide secure storage areas in prison facilities for employees 
                     authorized to carry a firearm.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Correctional Workers Safety 
Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. SECURE FIREARMS STORAGE IN PRISON FACILITIES.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 303 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 4049. Secure firearms storage in prison
    ``The Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall ensure that each 
prison facility provides a secure storage area for all persons employed 
by the Bureau at that facility who are authorized to carry a 
firearm.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 303 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new item:

``4049. Secure firearms storage in prison.''.
                                 <all>
```
`Exhibit 99.12



            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In  connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q of
Selkirk Cogen Funding  Corporation  for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, I,
John R. Cooper, Senior Vice President,  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
Selkirk  Funding  Corporation,  hereby  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
my knowledge and belief, that:

               (1)  such  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended
                    September 30, 2002 fully complies with the  requirements  of
                    section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
                    1934; and

               (2)  he information  contained in such  Quarterly  Report on Form
                    10-Q  for  the  quarter  ended  September  30,  2002  fairly
                    presents, in fll material respects,  the financial condition
                    and  results  of   aperations   of  Selkirk   Cogen  Funding
                    Corporation.


November 14, 2002                           /s/ JOHN R. COOPER
                                            ------------------------
                                            John R. Cooper
                                            Senior Vice President,
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            and Treasurer
                                            Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation`
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 20, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-50923

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARISOL MINJAREZ SARABIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-4-2

--------------------

Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marisol Minjarez Sarabia appeals her guilty plea conviction

and sentence for maintaining a premises within 1,000 feet of a

school for the purpose of distributing a controlled substance and

aiding and abetting. She argues that the Government relied on 

“extra-verdict facts” in declining to file a motion for a

downward departure in violation of her Sixth Amendment rights. 

The Government seeks to enforce the waiver in the plea agreement,
No. 05-50923

-2-

arguing that the appeal-waiver provision in Sarabia’s plea

agreement bars her appeal. 

Sarabia does not argue that the waiver-of-appeal provision

in her plea agreement was unknowing or involuntary. Moreover, at

rearraignment, Sarabia acknowledged the existence of the plea

agreement and the fact that she waived the right to appeal her

conviction and sentence. She also stated that she had read the

plea agreement before signing it and that she was entering into

the plea voluntarily. The fact that Sarabia waived her right to

appeal prior to the decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.

220 (2005), does not change this result. See United States v.

Burns, 433 F.3d 442, 450-51 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly,

Sarabia’s appeal is barred by the waiver contained in the plea

agreement. United States v. Portillo, 18 F.3d 290, 292 (5th Cir.

1994). 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION FOUND ON
PAGES 1 AND 2 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,920
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                       502
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,369
<PP&E>                                           5,154
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,032
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,650
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,660
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,391
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (138)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,374
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,396
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,396
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.36
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual
Report on Form 10-KSBA of American Access Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005, I, Timothy Adams, President, Principal Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSBA for
the year ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSBA for the year ended December 31, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American Access Technologies, Inc.

Date: February 2, 2007



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Timothy Adams                               
|Timothy Adams President, Chief Operating
Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19
- 0545 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RANDY CHRISTOPHER ARCHIBALD SR.,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 8, 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 1 2020

09/01/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0545
STATE v. McGIRT

No. COA06-609.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from Lee (02CRS54325, 02CRS54326, 02CRS54327).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1020/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1020/2013 of 23 October 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1020/2013                     

# of 23 October 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. DESKINS.

No. COA06-622.

Court of appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 18, 2007.

Certification Date October 8, 2007.

Appeal from Wilkes (02CRS55283).

Case reported without published opinion affirmed.
Willie D. GILBERT, II v. The NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR.

No. 41PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Katherine E. Jean, Raleigh, David R. Johnson, Deputy Counsel, for NC State Bar.

Eric C. Michaux, Durham, for Gilbert.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of January 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in *603the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
# Council Regulation (EU) No 733/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Council Regulation (EU) No 733/2013 of 22 July 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 994/98 on the application of Articles 92 and            93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community to certain categories of horizontal State aid (Text with EEA relevance)            (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Regulation (EU) No 733/2013                     

# of 22 July 2013

# amending Regulation (EC) No 994/98 on the application of Articles 92 and 93 of the Treaty establishing the European Community                        to certain categories of horizontal State aid                     

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1588 of 13 July 2015 on the application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning                                 of the European Union to certain categories of horizontal State aid (Text with EEA relevance).