alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (no.
333-52005) on Form S-1 of U.S. Timberlands Company, LP of our report dated April
11, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements of U.S. Timberlands
Company LP and subsidiaries and our report dated April 11, 2003 relating to the
financial statements of U.S. Timberlands Yakima, LLC, which are included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                          Eisner LLP (formerly Richard A. Eisner
                                          & Company LLP)


New York, New York
April 14, 2003
STATE of North Carolina v. Anh Viet THAI.

No. 7PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 28, 2007.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 175 N.C.App. 249, 623 S.E.2d 89 (2005), finding no prejudicial error in defendant's conviction which resulted in a judgment entered 28 May 2004 by Judge James E. Lanning in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, but remanding for resentencing. Heard in the Supreme Court 9 May 2007.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Q. Shanté Martin, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Isabel Scott Day, Mecklenburg County Public Defender, by Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

To the extent the Court of Appeals ordered remand of defendant's case for resentencing, we reverse and remand to that court for reconsideration in light of *State v. Blackwell,*361 N.C. 41, 638 S.E.2d 452 (2006), *cert. denied,* ___ U.S. ____, 127 S.Ct. 2281, ___ L.Ed.2d ___, 75 U.S.L.W. 3609 (2007). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
#### Kay Morgan, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v Douglas Morgan et al., Appellants.

[801 NYS2d 158]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs are the rightful owners of certain real property, the defendants appeal from stated portions of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated December 10, 2003, which after a nonjury trial, inter alia, declared that the plaintiff Kay Morgan was the sole title holder of the subject real property.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendants waived the assertion of the affirmative defen*1069ses of laches, unclean hands, and equitable estoppel by not raising them in the pleadings *(see*CPLR 3018 [b]; *Fade v Pugliani/ Fade,*8 AD3d 612, 614-615 [2004]; *Kromer v Kromer,*177 AD2d 472, 473 [1991]). In any event, there was sufficient proof adduced at trial for the Supreme Court, as the trier of fact, to conclude that the elements of the asserted defenses were not established.

The defendants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3382 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3382

     For the relief of Guy Privat Tape and Lou Nazie Raymonde Toto.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2008

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     For the relief of Guy Privat Tape and Lou Nazie Raymonde Toto.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR GUY PRIVAT TAPE AND LOU NAZIE 
              RAYMONDE TOTO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Guy Privat 
Tape and Lou Nazie Raymonde Toto shall each be eligible for the 
issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 
alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 
application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such 
Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Guy Privat Tape and Lou Nazie 
Raymonde Toto enters the United States before the filing deadline 
specified in subsection (c), Guy Privat Tape and Lou Nazie Raymonde 
Toto shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully in the 
United States and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for the issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees not later than 2 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon granting an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Guy Privat Tape and Lou Nazie 
Raymonde Toto, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer 
to reduce by 2, during the current or next following fiscal year, the 
total number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of 
the country of birth of Guy Privat Tape and Lou Nazie Raymonde Toto 
under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if 
applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available 
to natives of the country of birth of Guy Privat Tape and Lou Nazie 
Raymonde Toto under section 202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARIES OF DOCENT, INC.



|Subsidiary                       |  | State/Country of Incorporation
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Wholly Owned                     |  |                               
|                                 | 
|Docent International Corporation |  | Delaware                      
|Docent Europe BV                 |  | The Netherlands               
|Docent BV                        |  | The Netherlands               
|Docent AB                        |  | Sweden                        
|Docent, Ltd.                     |  | United Kingdom                
|Docent GmbH                      |  | Germany                       
|Docent SAS                       |  | France                        
|Docent ANZ PTY. Ltd.             |  | Australia                     
|Docent Japan                     |  | Japan
STATE of North Carolina v. Marion Preston GILLESPIE.

No. 2PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State of NC.

James R. Glover, Chapel Hill, for Gillespie.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 638 S.E.2d 481.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 5th day of January 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of *370the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of January 2007 by Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
September 30, 1995 Financial Statements of The Travelers Life & Annuity Company
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000929498
<NAME> THE TRAVELERS LIFE & ANNUITY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 918,597
<CASH>                                               0
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,882,474
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                676,824
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          817,191
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     321,471
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,882,474
<PREMIUMS>                                       1,334
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             46,762
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               2,331
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   9,578
<BENEFITS>                                      40,639
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             3,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,653
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,438
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,215
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Perrie Dyon SIMPSON.

No. 43A93-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 19, 2006.

Polly D. Sizemore, Joseph P. Gram, Greensboro, Robert M. Elliott, Winston-Salem, for Simpson.

*471Barry McNeill, Special Deputy Attorney General, Belinda J. Foster, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 18th day of January 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Rockingham County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of January 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,172
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         473,849
<DEPRECIATION>                                (62,087)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 447,648
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,067
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    353,404
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,868)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   447,648
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,602
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,572
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,353
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,777
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,777
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,777
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 11**

 

**PAULA FINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share**

(In thousands, except per share data)

 
| ** **                                                                    | ** ** | **Nine Months Ended   September 30,** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                                    | ** ** | **2004**                              | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** |
|                                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Net income                                                                    |       | $                                     | 915        |   | $ | 885 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Weighted average shares outstanding for  calculating basic earnings per share |       | 6,458,216                             |       | 6,217,682 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Options                                                                       |       | 287,833                               |       | 225,698 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Total shares for calculating diluted  earnings per share                      |       | 6,746,049                             |       | 6,443,380 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Basic earnings per share                                                      |       | $                                     | 0.14       |   | $ | 0.14 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Diluted earnings per share                                                    |       | $                                     | 0.14       |   | $ | 0.14 |   |

 

----
1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 02-1442

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Terrence Odell Watson, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 20, 2002 Filed: August 28, 2002

___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Terrence Odell Watson (Watson) appeals his sentence. Watson pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute in excess of 50 grams of cocaine base and 125 grams of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A) and 846. The presentence report assigned Watson five criminal history points under U.S.S.G. § 4A1 (2001), resulting in a criminal history category of III, but the district court 1 departed downward under section 4A1.3 to a criminal history category of II,-2- finding category III overstated the seriousness of Watson's past criminal conduct. Although Watson's sentencing range was then 97-121 months, the amount of drugs involved triggered a statutory mandatory minimum sentence of ten years imprisonment. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1). Watson argues the district court should have departed downward to category I, and he would then have been eligible for a sentence below the statutory mandatory minimum sentence under the safety valve reduction of section 5C1.2. To qualify for safety valve relief, a defendant may not be charged with more than one criminal history point as determined under section 4A1.1. See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(1) & application note 1. Because Watson was properly charged with five criminal history points under section 4A1, he does not qualify for the safety valve reduction under section 5C1.2. SeeUnited States v. Langmade , 236 F.3d 931, 932 (8th Cir. 2001); United States v. Webb , 218 F.3d 877, 881-82 (8th Cir. 2000); see also United States v. Heilmann , 235 F.3d 1146, 1148 (8th Cir. 2001).
We therefore affirm the sentence. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-111540, 333-115667, 333-117082, 333-120072, 333-120092,and 333-126609) and in the related Prospectuses, and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-111393, 333-109006, 333-83804, 333-58518, 333-118178 and 333-114642) of American Access Technologies, Inc. of our report dated January 30,2005, except for the fifth paragraph of Note 1 as to which the date is February 3, 2005, and the fifth paragraph of Note 14 as to which the date is February 18, 2005 and Note 20 as to which the date is August 12, 2005, with respect to theconsolidated financial statements of American Access Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries which appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSBA of American Access Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSBA for theyear ended December 31, 2004. The report included an explanatory paragraph regarding the restatement of the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

**RACHLIN COHEN & HOLTZ LLP**

 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 

August 12, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-25-1998
<CASH>                                       6,986,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,130,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,878,000
<INVENTORY>                                 15,868,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,066,000
<PP&E>                                      56,874,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              21,760,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              80,792,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,100,000
<BONDS>                                      2,133,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,400
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,130,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                80,792,000
<SALES>                                     66,080,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,080,000
<CGS>                                       40,305,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               40,305,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,536,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,878,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             206,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,376,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,989,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,387,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,387,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63
        

</TABLE>