alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Jackson, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





August 9, 2011
By:
/s/ David A. JacksonDavid A. JacksonPresident and Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Return to Form 10-Q
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3294 

AN ACT 

To provide for the continued performance of the functions 

of the United States Parole Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 3294 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Parole 

3 Commission Extension Act of 2008’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF SENTENCING REFORM ACT OF 

5 1984. 

6 For purposes of section 235(b) of the Sentencing Re7 form Act of 1984 (18 U.S.C. 3551 note; Public Law 98– 

8 473; 98 Stat. 2032), as such section relates to chapter 

9 311 of title 18, United States Code, and the United States 

10 Parole Commission, each reference in such section to ‘‘21 

11 years’’ or ‘‘21-year period’’ shall be deemed a reference 

12 to ‘‘24 years’’ or ‘‘24-year period’’, respectively. 

Passed the Senate July 21, 2008. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3294 

AN ACT 

To provide for the continued performance of the 

functions of the United States Parole Commission.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,875-01

EX PARTE ROBERT DAVID MIELNICKI, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. C-371-010245-1230331-A IN THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of robbery and

sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

In a single ground, Applicant contends that he pleaded guilty on the condition that his

sentence would run concurrently with a federal sentence. The trial court adopted the State’s

proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law and recommended that we set aside Applicant’s

conviction. Ex parte Huerta, 692 S.W.2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985).

We believe the record should be further developed. Neither the plea papers nor the space on

the judgment for the terms of the plea bargain say concurrent sentences was a condition of the plea
bargain. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances,

additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order

trial counsel and the prosecutor to file affidavits in response to Applicant’s claim. The trial court

shall also order the District Clerk to forward the reporter’s record of the plea hearing, if it exists. 

The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

Applicant appears to be represented by counsel. If he is not and the trial court elects to hold

a hearing, it shall determine whether he is indigent. If he is indigent and wishes to be represented

by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX.CODECRIM.

PROC. art. 26.04. 

After reviewing trial counsel’s and the prosecutor’s affidavits and other evidence in the

record, if any, the trial court shall determine whether concurrent sentences was a condition of the

plea bargain. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that

it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 17, 2014

Do not publish
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 314/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 314/2013 of 4 April 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 314/2013                     

# of 4 April 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 April 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929454
<NAME>                        GLENBOROUGH REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.000
<CASH>                          2,770
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,805
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                7,645
<PP&E>                          623,829
<DEPRECIATION>                  35,185
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  615,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           121,018
<BONDS>                         142,955
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        20
<OTHER-SE>                      311,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    615,976
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                40,787
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   11,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                11,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              6,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 11,502
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             11,502
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    11,502
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.73
        


</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 192/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 192/2013 of 5 March 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 192/2013                     

# of 5 March 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 March 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12

                        WAVETEK WANDEL GOLTERMANN, INC.

        SCHEDULE RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                            (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                           1999       1998        1997       1996       1995
<S>                                                    <C>          <C>         <C>        <C>        <C>
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes and
minority interest in income (loss)..................... $(11,078)   $(25,822)   $ 14,605   $  6,380   $(16,743)
Interest expense.......................................   20,965       7,629       8,509      9,340     10,591
Interest portion of rental expense.....................    2,924       1,948       1,457      1,280      2,997
                                                        --------    --------    --------   --------   --------
      Earnings                                          $ 12,811    $(16,245)   $ 24,571   $ 17,000   $ (3,155)
                                                        ========    ========    ========   ========   ========

Interest expense....................................... $ 20,965    $  7,629    $  8,509   $  9,340   $ 10,591
Interest portion of rental expense.....................    2,924       1,948       1,457      1,280      2,997
                                                        --------    --------    --------   --------   --------
Fixed charges.......................................... $ 23,889    $  9,577    $  9,966   $ 10,620   $ 13,588
                                                        ========    ========    ========   ========   ========


Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                          0.5x      (1.7)x        2.5x       1.6x     (0.2)x
                                                        ========    ========    ========   ========   ========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,748
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          13,708
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     11,828
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         167,372
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           169,209
<LOANS>                                        167,666
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 373,837
<DEPOSITS>                                     259,924
<SHORT-TERM>                                    33,263
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,888
<LONG-TERM>                                     36,892
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           282
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,588
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 373,837
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,259
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,919
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,178
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,719
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,590
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,588
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  93
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,753
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,240
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,240
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.13
<LOANS-NON>                                        399
<LOANS-PAST>                                       948
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,481
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       56
<RECOVERIES>                                        61
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,516
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               816
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            700
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MEGHAN FLYNN, GINA SOSCIA, JAMES FISHWICK, GLENN JACOBS, GLENN KASPER AND ALISON L. HIGGINS,

Petitioners

v.

SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 249 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of August, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
**OFFI& OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  

### January 86, 19SQ

Hon. QeorgeH. Sheppard Comptroller Austin,Texsa Dear **Mr. Sheppard:**  

### (' \

.0p1h10n

Ho. &j 0-S '\ Be: Validity **of** 

### the '.\ county eolalTax a A cant t '\ \3

39, to Eonoaabls aot betwesnYilam reoeiredby this our opinionon and should**be** 

### aponey Goneral. traotwhereby **a** 

### peraon Is to aad all delinquent s a speelalaontraotunder ent the Stats of Texas In ular suits in whioh the II dlsquallfledto aat rspresentsdthe defendanta at this dontraatoan only e same law and ssme statutesthat tax aontraataIn general,and one s Artiole 7335 of the RevisedCivil whloh in part says:
ver the ocxamlssioners oourt of any a0 u&y&ter thirtydayswrittennotibr to the oouutpattorneyor **diatriot** 

### attorneyto file de- 'llnquent

tax suite **and** 

### his Mltue to do so, shall 3 may eeln oontraotwith sng oompsteatattorneyto snfaros or assl8t in ths eniordementof the oolleotlon of any dsllnqusntState **and** 

### oountytams...".

'Hon. George H. Sheppard, Janwiry 26, 1939, Page 2

This statute clearly limits com!!issioners' courts entering into these contracts until "after thirty days written notice to the county attorney or district attorney to ffle delinquent tax suits and his failure to do SO."

The contract in question does not show or recite that such notice has been eiven or that the notice has been waived, or no outside proof to that effect has be-n riven us. The contract recites that It has been entered into because the district attorney is ineligible to represent the state on these cases; but we don't believe that that recitation obviates the neoesslty of the thirty day notice or a waiver from the district attorney waivinp the notice. If the district attorney is ineligible to represent the state in these cases, then a thirty-day notice could be riven him and he could fail to act, or he could waive the notice and if he desired to dc so he could give hitsreasons by stating that he was ineliclble to act.

For the reasons outline& above xe -ive as our opinion that this contract does not appear to be valid, and the Comptroller and the Attorney "enera shouaR not approve it. Yours very truly .!iTTOR.WY

SV?:":"hL

OP TEXAS By (si.cned)Cecil 2. Rotsch Assistant CCR:BT ApPROv".3: (signed) Gerald C. Mann ATTOR?DY GENERAL 0" TEXAS
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                9, 2007 | By:    |  /s/              David A. Jackson |
|---------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                            |   | David                A. Jackson         |
|                            |   | Chief                Financial Officer  |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight      Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.*

Back      to Form 10-Q
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                                                   PAGE 1 of 1


                    Lehman Structured Securities Corporation
                  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
                                  Series 1996-1


Annual Report to Certificateholders for 1998


Payment Summary

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Excess
           Beginning                                   Interest
           Balance     Principal     Distributable      Amount
          (January    Adjustment      Certificate      Applied to                  Ending
 Class     1998)        Amount         Interest        Principal    Total Paid      Balance
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>      <C>            <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>          
  E-1    27,789,645.49  1,087,416.94   2,179,525.37  1,087,416.94  3,266,942.31   26,702,228.55
  E-2    33,965,122.28  1,329,065.16   2,663,864.33  1,329,065.16  3,992,929.49   32,636,057.12
   R              0.00          0.00           0.00          0.00          0.00            0.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals:  61,754,767.77  2,416,482.10   4,843,389.70  2,416,482.10  7,259,871.80  59,338,285.67
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>



Additional Information:
-------------------------------
Trustee Fee           $3,029.02
-------------------------------


                                       10