alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
31.1**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, James
A. Coyne, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Professional Lease Management
Income Fund I, L.L.C. (the Registrant).
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 
 a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 
 
 
 Date:
November 11, 2005  By:  /s/
James A. Coyne
 James A. Coyne
 President
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 136 (Monday, July 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15276]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11787]


Overseas Security Advisory Council (OSAC) Meeting Notice; Closed 
Meeting

    The Department of State announces an amendment to the meeting of 
the U.S. State Department's Overseas Security Advisory Council 
originally schedule November 15, 2022. The new meeting date will now be 
November 17, 2022. Pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. Appendix), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(7)(E), it has been determined that the meeting will be closed 
to the public. The meeting will focus on an examination of corporate 
security policies and procedures and will involve extensive discussion 
of trade secrets and proprietary commercial information that is 
privileged and confidential, and will discuss law enforcement 
investigative techniques and procedures. The agenda will include 
updated committee reports, global threat overviews, and other matters 
relating to private sector security policies and protective programs 
and the protection of U.S. business information overseas.
    For more information, contact Rebecca Spingarn, Overseas Security 
Advisory Council, U.S. Department of State, Washington, DC 20522-2008, 
phone: 571-228-3221.

Kevin E. Bryant,
Acting Director, Office of Directives Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-15276 Filed 7-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-43-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 3, 2013

s0826 

# Order

Clerk September 3, 2013

147076

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIG AN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147076

COA: 307744

Kent CC: 11

- 005979

- FH

ROBERT ROCKWELL MAIER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 14, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 960/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 960/2013 of 7 October 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 960/2013                     

# of 7 October 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1
TANISYS TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                                       
                STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                 FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997


<TABLE>
                                        Common        Common                       Weighted
                                         Share        Shares          Days   Average Number
  Date      Description               Activity   Outstanding   Outstanding        of Shares
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>         <C>                       <C>        <C>           <C>           <C>
 9/30/97    Balance                               20,334,714            21        4,641,620
10/21/97    Exercise of stock options   75,000    20,409,714            62       13,754,372 
12/22/97    Issuance of common shares   50,000    20,459,714             9        2,001,494 
12/31/97    Balance                               20,459,714 

                                                   Weighted Average Shares       20,397,486 
                                                                  Net Loss      $(1,659,188)

                                       Loss per Weighted Average Share:
                                                                     Basic      $     (0.08)
                                                                   Diluted      $     (0.08)
</TABLE>






                                       1
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Young Broadcasting Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



August 14,
2008

/s/VINCENT J. YOUNGVincent J. YoungChief Executive Officer/s/JAMES A. MORGANJames A. MorganChief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 324 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study of water resources 

in the State of New Mexico. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2007 

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study 

of water resources in the State of New Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New Mexico Aquifer 

5 Assessment Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NEW MEXICO WATER RESOURCES STUDY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior, act8 ing through the Director of the United States Geological 

9 Survey (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Secretary’’), in co10 ordination with the State of New Mexico (referred to in 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 324 IS

1 this Act as the ‘‘State’’) and any other entities that the 

2 Secretary determines to be appropriate (including other 

3 Federal agencies and institutions of higher education), 

4 shall, in accordance with this Act and any other applicable 

5 law, conduct a study of water resources in the State, in6 cluding— 

7 (1) a survey of groundwater resources, includ8 ing an analysis of— 

9 (A) aquifers in the State, including the 

10 quantity of water in the aquifers; 

11 (B) the availability of groundwater re12 sources for human use; 

13 (C) the salinity of groundwater resources; 

14 (D) the potential of the groundwater re15 sources to recharge; 

16 (E) the interaction between groundwater 

17 and surface water; 

18 (F) the susceptibility of the aquifers to 

19 contamination; and 

20 (G) any other relevant criteria; and 

21 (2) a characterization of surface and bedrock 

22 geology, including the effect of the geology on 

23 groundwater yield and quality. 

24 (b) STUDY AREAS.—The study carried out under 

25 subsection (a) shall include the Estancia Basin, Salt 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 324 IS

1 Basin, Tularosa Basin, Hueco Basin, and middle Rio 

2 Grande Basin in the State. 

3 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 2 years after the date 

4 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 

5 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 

6 Senate and the Committee on Resources of the House of 

7 Representatives a report that describes the results of the 

8 study. 

9 (d) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

10 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec11 essary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000549

23-MAR-2017

08:04 AM
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Lewis JORDAN.

No. 10P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Robert Lewis Jordan, pro se.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th day of January 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Pitt County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
NOT FOR PUB LIC ATION UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C U IT SHANNON B REW ER ,

Pla i ntiff-Appe lla

nt, v. NANC Y A. B ERR

YHILL, Ac ting C om m issione r Soc ia l Se c urity , De fe nda nt-Appe l le e . No. 16-35652 D.C . No. 3:15-c v-05703-JC C W e ste rn Distric t of W a shington, Ta c om a ORDER

B e fore : THOM AS, C hie f Judge , a nd TR OTT a

n d SILVER

M AN, C irc uit Judge s Pla intiff-Appe lla

nt’ s unoppose d m otion to rem and for c onside ration of ne w e vide nc e [Doc . # 31] is GR ANTED. This a

ppe a l is R EM ANDED for furthe r a dm inistra

tive proc e e dings. 

# FIL ED N OV 09 2017 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS
FARM BUREAU v. ARMWOOD, et al.

No. 99A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 22, 2007.

R. Michael Strickland, Glenn C. Raynor, for N.C. Farm Bureau.

Frank A. Cassiano, Greenville, John Bramble, Charles David Creech, New Bern, for Armwood, et al.

Garth Gersten, Durham, for Insurers Asso. & Ins. Asso.

James W. Bryan, Daniel W. Koenig, Greensboro, for Trucking Industry Defense Asso.

*613David L. Brown, Greensboro, for Defense Attorneys.

M. David Rhodes, for NCATL.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of June 2007 by NCATL for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of June 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6077

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALBERT DELON REED, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District

Judge. (CR-94-383; CA-01-2684-4-12)

Submitted: October 18, 2004 Decided: October 27, 2004

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Albert Delon Reed, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker

Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Albert Delon Reed, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final

order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Reed has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           28,664
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    23,959
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (722)
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                          567,964
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (7,936)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  635,495
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                         146,823
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                     353,904
<COMMON>                                              1
<OTHER-SE>                                      110,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    635,495
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 17,976
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     7,490
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               8,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      8,636
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .02



</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Scott Robert ERICKSON.

No. 95P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Thomas K. Maher, for Erickson.

Neil Dalton, Special Deputy Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 640 S.E.2d 761.

*ORDER*

Defendant's petition for discretionary review is allowed for the limited purpose to review Issue No. 1 (that it was plain error for the court not to instruct the jury on second-degree murder). As to all other issues, discretionary review is denied.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 3rd day of May, 2007.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929454
<NAME>                        Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         610
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               610
<PP&E>                                         126,124
<DEPRECIATION>                                 26,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,205
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,072
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       6
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,829
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,205
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,787
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,915
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,546
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,326
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,326
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                7,735
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,409)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Nathaniel P., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 843]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold J. Lynch, J.), entered on or about July 6, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of robbery in the third degree, and placed him on probation for a period of one year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s credibility determinations, including its evaluation of conflicting testimony *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The credible evidence established that appellant used force in stealing the victim’s money. Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
IN RE J.T.R.

No. COA06-996

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Randolph (05J163).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.