alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 50406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16962]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--American Society of Mechanical Engineers

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 2, 2005, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), American Society of Mechanical 
Engineers (``ASME'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
additions or changes to its standards development activities. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, since April 29, 
2005, AMSE has revised, added, or deleted several consensus committee 
charters; and has published several new standards, all within the 
general nature and scope of ASME's standards development activities, as 
specified in its original notification. More detail regarding these 
changes can be found at http://www.asme.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASME filed its original notification 
pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of 
the Act on October 13, 2004 (69 FR 60895).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 9, 2005. 
A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) 
of the Act on May 26, 2005 (70 FR 30485).

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-16962 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
TEAGUE v. DOT.

No. 281P06-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Tina Krasner, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of January *7742007 by Petitioner for Declaratory Judgment on five separate and distinct alternative NC statutes all referenced to the subject case:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."
# Council Decision of 30 July 2014 appointing a German member of the European Economic and Social Committee (2014/519/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 30 July 2014

# appointing a German member of the European Economic and Social Committee

# (2014/519/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the GermanGovernment,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and                              Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015(1).

(2)A member's seaton the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of                              Ms Michaela ROSENBERGER,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Peter SCHMIDT, *Geschäftsführer der Gewerkschaft Nahrung-Genuss-Gaststätten, Region Allgäu,* is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 20 September 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Gozi                            

1

OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.
Exhibit 99(c)

	ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE
	Pursuant to the

	Master Pooling and Servicing Agreement

	SAKS INCORPORATED

_________________________________________

 

	The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Household Finance Corporation, as Successor Servicer (the "Successor Servicer"), pursuant to a Master Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of August 21, 1997, as amended, by and among Saks Credit Card Corporation as Transferor, HRSI Funding, Inc. III as Successor Transferor, Saks Incorporated as Servicer, the Successor Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee, does hereby certify that:

		1.	The Successor Servicer is, as of the date hereof, the Successor Servicer under the Agreement.  Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

		2.	The undersigned is a servicing officer who is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

		3.	A review of the activities of the Successor Servicer from May 15, 2003 through December 31, 2003 (the "Period") and of its performance under the Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

		4.	Based on such review, the Successor Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such Period and no default in the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 5 below.

 

	5.	The following is a description of each default in the performance of the Successor Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Agreement known to me to have been made by 	the Successor Servicer during the Period ended December 31, 2003, which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such default, (ii) the action taken by the Successor Servicer, if any, to remedy each 	such default and (iii) the current status of each such default: 
**	N O N E**
	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 25th day of March, 2004

 

 

						HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORPORATION

						  as Successor Servicer

 

						By: 	_/s/ Steven H. Smith __

	Steven H. Smith

							Assistant Treasurer

 

SAKS
STATE v. Anthony Leon HOOVER.

No. 370P04-6.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Elizabeth N. Strickland, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of March 2007 by Defendant for "Petition for Motion Writ of Production of Documentary of State Procedure":

> *372"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
The NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR v. Michael H. McGEE, Attorney.

No. 406P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Michael H. McGee, Pro Se, for McGee.

David R. Johnson, for State Bar.

*650*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th day of August 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kevin P. Knight, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





May
      11, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      Kevin P. KnightKevin
      P. KnightChief
      Executive Officer








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight
Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 649/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 649/2013 of 8 July 2013 derogating from Regulations (EC) No 1122/2009 and (EU)            No 65/2011 as regards the reduction of the amounts of the aid for late submission of single applications in relation to alpine            pastures in mountain areas of Austria for 2013 (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 649/2013                     

# of 8 July 2013

# derogating from Regulations (EC) No 1122/2009 and (EU) No 65/2011 as regards the reduction of the amounts of the aid for late                        submission of single applications in relation to alpine pastures in mountain areas of Austria for 2013 (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 of 11 March 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European                                 Parliament and of the Council with regard to the integrated administration and control system and conditions for refusal or                                 withdrawal of payments and administrative penalties applicable to direct payments, rural development support and cross compliance.
(August 18, 2005)

#### In the Matter of John Parete, Petitioner, and Phil Terpening, Proposed Intervenor-Respondent, v Thomas Turco et al., as Commissioners of the Ulster County Board of Elections, Respondents, and Joan A. Every et al., Appellants.

[800 NYS2d 247]

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Kavanagh, J.), entered August 2, 2005 in Ulster County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, granted Phil Terpening’s application for leave to intervene as a petitioner and invalidated the designating petition naming respondents Joan A. Every, Brian Hathaway and Gloria S. Van Vliet as Conservative Party candidates for the office of Ulster County Legislator for the 7th Legislative District in the September 13, 2005 primary election.

On July 25, 2005, petitioner, Chair of the Ulster County Democratic Committee, commenced this proceeding under Election Law § 16-102 seeking to invalidate the designating petition naming respondents Joan A. Every, Brian Hathaway and Gloria S. Van Vliet (hereinafter collectively referred to as respondents) as Conservative Party candidates for the office of Ulster County Legislator for the 7th Legislative District in the September 13, 2005 primary election. The petition asserted that the designating petition did not contain the required number of valid signatures. After respondents served an answer raising, among other things, an objection challenging petitioner’s standing to maintain the proceeding, Phil Terpening, a candidate for the Democratic, Independence and Working Family Parties nominations for the same office, moved to intervene in the proceeding *692as a petitioner and to invalidate the designating petition on the same basis. While finding that petitioner did not have standing to bring the proceeding, Supreme Court permitted Terpening to intervene and invalidated the designating petition for failure to contain the requisite number of valid signatures. Respondents now appeal and we reverse.

The issue is not whether petitioner had standing to bring this proceeding. He lacks *capacity*to sue by reason of the statutory prohibition found in Election Law § 16-102. Ultimately, a standing analysis is aimed at promoting the judiciary’s self-imposed policy of restraint to avoid giving advisory opinions, while capacity involves a litigant’s power to appear and bring a grievance to court *(see Community Bd. 7 of Borough of Manhattan v Schaffer,*84 NY2d 148, 155 [1994]). Lacking capacity, petitioner could not institute this proceeding and, therefore, none existed in which Terpening could intervene *(see e.g. Matter of Town of Johnstown v City of Gloversville,*36 AD2d 143, 145 [1971], *appeal dismissed*29 NY2d 639 [1971]). Thus, Supreme Court lacked authority to permit intervention and entertain the petition.

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, motion to intervene denied and petition dismissed.
# The Iran (European Union Financial Sanctions) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 163

Criminal Law

# The Iran (European Union Financial Sanctions) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

29th January 2013

Laid before Parliament

30th January 2013

Coming into force

31st January 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (18.1.2016) by The Iran (European Union Financial Sanctions) Regulations 2016 (S.I. 2016/36), **regs. 1(1)**, 20(1)(c) (with regs. 18, 21)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997       DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997       JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997       JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           7,787                 0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,657                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       480                 0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,735                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,466                 0
<PP&E>                                          13,505                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,943                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,546                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,148                 0
<BONDS>                                              0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                 0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                 0
<COMMON>                                        19,917                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (528)                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,546                 0
<SALES>                                         36,098            28,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,098            28,180
<CGS>                                           22,580            17,870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,677            23,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 147               828
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,274             3,445
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,049             1,322
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,225             1,991
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                 0
<CHANGES>                                            0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,225             1,991
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39<F1>          0.47<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38<F1>          0.47<F1>
<FN>
<F1>
This information has been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 128, and basic 
and diluted EPS have been entered in place of primary and fully diluted, 
respectively.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00120

- CR
Torivio "Toby" Gutierrez v. The State o f Texas
On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Goliad County , Texas Trial Cause No. 15

- 01

- 4816

- CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 26, 2020
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Carroll Shelby, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Advanced Engine Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; and 

 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

(c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 INCLUDED IN THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT FOR SUCH PERIOD AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,405
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,633
<INVENTORY>                                     16,478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,052
<PP&E>                                          50,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,989
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,095
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           236
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,881
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,686
<SALES>                                        262,111
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               262,111
<CGS>                                          235,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  269,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,982
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       456
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,206)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,605)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.80)
        

</TABLE>