Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices 51405 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Sky Unlimited, 

to operate its Beech 1900 aircraft after 

March 29, 2005, without being equipped 

with an approved terrain awareness and 

warning system that meets the 

requirements for Class B equipment I 

Technical Standard Order (TSO)–C151. 

Denial, 5/12/2005, Exemption No. 

8556. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21106. 

Petitioner: Mr. James G. Brendel. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.109(a). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Mr. James G. 

Brendel, to conduct certain flight 

training in Beechcraft Bonanza/ 

Debonair type aircraft that are equipped 

with a functioning throw-over control 

wheel. 

Grant, 5/12/2005, Exemption No. 

8557. 

Docket No.: FAA–2002–13311. 

Petitioner: The Boeing Company. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

21.325(b)(3). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Boeing’s 

Organizational Designated 

Airworthiness Representatives to issue 

export airworthiness approvals for Class 

II and Class III products manufactured 

by Boeing-approved suppliers in 19 

foreign countries and Taiwan. 

Grant, 5/12/2005, Exemption No. 

6860E. 

Docket No.: FAA–2002–11840. 

Petitioner: Davis Aerospace High 

School. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.251, 135.255, and 135.353, and 

appendices I and J. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Davis Aerospace 

High School and Black Pilots 

Association, to conduct local 

sightseeing flights at the Detroit City 

Airport, Detroit, Michigan, on or about 

May 15, 2005, for compensation or hire, 

without complying with certain antidrug and alcohol misuse prevention 

requirements of part 135. 

Grant, 5/12/2005, Exemption No. 

8554. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9097. 

Petitioner: Federal Express 

Corporation. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Federal Express 

Corporation, to operate certain aircraft 

under part 135 without a TSO–C112 

(Mode S) transponder installed in the 

aircraft. 

Grant, 5/16/2005, Exemption No. 

5711H. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–20935. 

Petitioner: Pomona Valley Pilots 

Association. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.251, 135.255, and 135.353, and 

appendices I and J. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Pomona Valley 

Pilots Association, to conduct local 

sightseeing flights for the Pomona 

Valley Air Fair at the Cable Airport, 

Upland, California, on July 9 and 10, 

2005, for compensation or hire to raise 

money for scholarship funds for local 

colleges, without complying with 

certain anti-drug and alcohol misuse 

prevention requirements of part 135. 

Grant, 5/16/2005, Exemption No. 

8555. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9282. 

Petitioner: Air Transport Association 

of America, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

63.39(b)(1) and (2) and 121.425(a)(2)(i) 

and (ii). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Air Transport 

Association of America, Inc., member 

airlines and other qualifying part 

121certificate holders conducting part 

121-approved flight engineer training 

programs to meet the certification 

requirements of § 121.425(a)(2)(i) and 

(ii) in a single flight check. The 

exemption also allows applicants in 

training for the flight check to take (1) 

the airplane preflight inspection portion 

of that flight check using an advanced 

pictorial means instead of an airplane, 

and (2) the normal procedure portion of 

that flight check in an approved flight 

simulation device. Furthermore, the 

exemption allows qualifying persons 

conducting part 63 flight engineer 

courses and all part 142 training center 

certificate holders conducting flight 

engineer training courses in accordance 

with part 63 to allow applicants who are 

training in preparation for the flight 

engineer practical test to take the 

normal procedures portion of that test in 

an approved flight simulation device. 

Grant, 5/20/2005, Exemption No. 

4901I. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9379. 

Petitioner: Air Transport Association 

of America, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.613, 121.619(a), and 121.625. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Air transport 

Association, Inc., member airlines and 

other similarly situated part 121 

operators to continue to dispatch 

airplanes under instrument flight rules 

when conditional language in a onetime increment of the weather forecast 

states that the weather at the 

destination, alternate airport, or both 

airports could be below the authorized 

weather minimums when other time 

increments of the weather forecast state 

that weather conditions will be at or 

above the authorized weather 

minimums. 

Grant, 5/26/05, Exemption No. 

3585O. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21194. 

Petitioner: Black Hills Aerial 

Adventures, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Black Hills 

Aerial Adventures Inc., to operate 

certain aircraft under part 135 without 

a TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder 

installed in the aircraft. 

Grant, 5/26/2005, Exemption No. 

8559. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–14242. 

Petitioner: World Airways, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.434(c)(1)(ii). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit World Airways, 

Inc., to substitute a qualified and 

authorized check airman or aircrew 

program designee for an Federal 

Aviation Administration inspector to 

observe a qualifying pilot in command 

and who is completing initial or 

upgrade training specified in § 121.424 

during at least on flight leg that include 

a takeoff and a landing. 

Grant, 5/27/2005, Exemption No. 

8058A. 

[FR Doc. 05–17216 Filed 8–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

[Summary Notice No. PE–2005–46] 

Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions 

of Petitions Issued 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of disposition of prior 

petition. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking 

provisions governing the application, 

processing, and disposition of petitions 

for exemption, part 11 of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this 

notice contains the disposition of 

certain petitions previously received. 

The purpose of this notice is to improve 

the public’s awareness of, and 

participation in, this aspect of FAA’s 

regulatory activities. Neither publication 

of this notice nor the inclusion or 

51406 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices 

omission of information in the summary 

is intended to affect the legal status of 

any petition or its final disposition. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim 

Adams (202) 267–8033, Sandy 

Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267–7271, or 

John Linsenmeyer (202) 267–5174, 

Office of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal 

Aviation Administration, 800 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91. 

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 24, 

2005. 

Anthony F. Fazio, 

Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

Disposition of Petitions 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–10875. 

Petitioner: Fresh Water Adventures, 

Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.323(b)(4). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Fresh Water 

Adventures, Inc. to operate its 

Grumman Goose G–21A amphibian 

aircraft at a weight that is in excess of 

that airplane’s maximum certified 

weight. 

Grant, 06/01/2005, Exemption No. 

7070C. 

Docket No.: FAA–2002–12484. 

Petitioner: Dynamic Aviation. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

137.53(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit pilots employed 

by Dynamic Aviation, to conduct aerial 

applications of insecticides of 

pheromones for aircraft not equipped 

with a load jettisoning system; and to 

allow Dynamic Aviation pilots to 

operate additional aircraft under this 

exemption. 

Grant, 06/01/2005, Exemption No. 

7827E. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21697. 

Petitioner: George’s Aviation Services, 

Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit George’s 

Aviation Services to operate certain 

aircraft under part 135 without a TSO–

C112 (Mode S) transponder installed in 

the aircraft. 

Grant, 06/05/2005, Exemption No. 

8577. 

Docket No.: FAA–2002–11723. 

Petitioner: United States Coast Guard. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.117(b) and (c), 91.119(c), 91.159(a), 

91.209(a). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit the United States 

Coast Guard to conduct air operations in 

support of drug law enforcement and 

drug traffic interdiction without meeting 

part 91 provisions governing: (1) aircraft 

speed, (2) minimum safe altitudes, (3) 

cruising operations for flights conducted 

under visual flight rules, and (4) use of 

aircraft lights. 

Grant, 06/06/2005, Exemption No. 

5231H. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–15806. 

Petitioner: Ameristar Air Cargo, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.203(a) and (b), 121.153(a)(1). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Ameristar Air 

Cargo, Inc., to operate its U.S. registered 

aircraft in domestic operations 

temporarily following the incidental 

loss or mutilation of that aircraft’s 

unworthiness certificate or registration 

certificate, or both. 

Grant, 06/06/2005, Exemption No. 

8127A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–20225. 

Petitioner: Era Helicopters, LLC. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Era Helicopters, 

LLC to operate certain aircraft under 

part 135 without a TSO–C112 (Mode S) 

transponder installed in the aircraft. 

Grant, 06/06/2005, Exemption No. 

8484A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–20948. 

Petitioner: Honeywell International, 

Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

21.325(b)(3). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Honeywell’s 

Organizational Designated 

Airworthiness representatives to issue 

export airworthiness approvals for Class 

II and Class III products manufactured 

at the Honeywell facility in Hermosillo, 

Sonora, Mexico. 

Denial, 06/08/2005, Exemption No. 

8566. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21319. 

Petitioner: Mentone Flying Club, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.251, 135.255, and 135.353, and 

appendices I and J. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Mentone Flying 

Club, Inc., to conduct local sightseeing 

flights at the Fulton County Airport, 

Rochester, Indiana, for the Round Barn 

Festival on June 11, 2005, for 

compensation or hire, without 

complying with certain anti-drug and 

alcohol misuse prevention requirements 

of part 135. 

Grant, 06/07/2005, Exemption No. 

8560. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21386. 

Petitioner: Aris Helicopters. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Aris Helicopters 

to operate certain aircraft under part 135 

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S) 

transponder installed in the aircraft. 

Grant, 06/09/2005, Exemption No. 

8561. 

Docket No.: FAA–2004–17395. 

Petitioner: Flying Boat, Inc. d.b.a 

Chalk’s International Airlines. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.354(b). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Flying Boat, Inc. 

d.b.a Chalks International Airlines 

(Chalk’s), to continue to operate four 

Grumman Turbine Mallard G73T 

aircraft after March 29, 2005, without 

having an approved terrain awareness 

and warning system that meets the 

requirements for Class A equipment in 

Technical Standard Order (TSO)–C151 

installed on these aircraft. The 

exemption also permits Chalk’s to 

operate these aircraft without an 

approved terrain awareness display. 

Grant, 06/10/2005, Exemption No. 

8563. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–20146. 

Petitioner: Mr. Mike Vande Guchte. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.251, 135.255, and 135.353 and 

appendices I and J. 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Mr. Mike Vande 

Guchte to conduct local sightseeing 

flights at the Tulip City Airport, 

Holland, Michigan, on June 25, 2005, for 

compensation or hire, without 

complying with certain anti-drug and 

alcohol misuse prevention requirements 

of part 135. 

Grant, 06/10/2005, Exemption No. 

8564. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–15027. 

Petitioner: Liberty Aviation Services, 

LLC. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Liberty Aviation 

Services, LLC, to operate certain aircraft 

under part 135 without a TSO–C112 

(Mode S) transponder installed in those 

aircraft. 

Grant, 06/10/2005, Exemption No. 

8035A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21090. 

Petitioner: Air Arctic. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Air Arctic to 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices 51407 

operate aircraft under part 135 without 

a TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder 

installed in the aircraft. 

Grant, 06/10/2005, Exemption No. 

8567. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9782. 

Petitioner: Clarke Mosquito Control. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.313(d). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Clarke Mosquito 

Control to carry passengers in certain 

aircraft, certificated in the restricted 

category, while performing aerial-site 

survey flights. 

Grant, 06/10/2005, Exemption No. 

8568. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9463. 

Petitioner: Fare Share, Ltd. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Fare Share, Ltd., 

to operate certain aircraft without a 

TSO–C112 (Mode S) transponder 

installed in the aircraft. 

Grant, 06/10/2005, Exemption No. 

7542B. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–16067. 

Petitioner: Corporate Air. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Corporate Air to 

operate certain aircraft without a TSO–

C112 (Mode S) transponder installed on 

aircraft. 

Grant, 06/10/2005, Exemption No. 

8133A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2004–17662. 

Petitioner: Liberty Foundation, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.315, 119.5(g), and 119.21(a). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Liberty 

Foundation, Inc., to operate it’s Boeing 

B–17 aircraft with registration no. 

N390TH and serial no. 44–85734 to 

carry passengers for compensation or 

hire on local flights for educational and 

historical purposes. 

Grant, 06/10/2005, Exemption No. 

8565. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9352. 

Petitioner: International Aerobatic 

Club. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.151(a)(1). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit International 

Aerobatic Club members to carry less 

than the visual flight rules fuel 

requirements under certain conditions. 

Grant, 06/13/2005, Exemption No. 

5745F. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–8754. 

Petitioner: Everts Air Fuel, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.9(a). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To allow Everts Air Fuel, 

Inc., to operate its McDonnell Douglas 

DC–6 aircraft (registration no. N251CE, 

N444CE, N451CE, N888DG, and 

N400UA) at a 5-percent increased zero 

fuel weight and landing weight for allcargo aircraft to provide supplies to 

people in isolated villages in Alaska. 

Grant, 06/13/2005, Exemption No. 

4296M. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–20224. 

Petitioner: American Military Heritage 

Foundation. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

119.5(g) and 119.21(a). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit American 

Military Heritage Foundation to operate 

its Lockheed PV–2 aircraft (with 

registration no. N7265C and serial 

no.15–1362) to carry passengers for 

compensation or hire on local flights for 

educational historical purposes. 

Grant, 06/17/2005, Exemption No. 

8570. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–16009. 

Petitioner: Mr. Richard E. Druschel. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.109(a) and (b)(3). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Mr. Richard E. 

Druschel to conduct certain flight 

instruction and simulated instrument 

flights to meet the recent experience 

requirements in certain Beech aircraft 

equipped with a functioning throw-over 

control wheel in place of functioning 

dual controls. 

Grant, 06/21/2005, Exemption No. 

8125A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–9195. 

Petitioner: Helicopter Association 

International. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.213(a). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Helicopter 

Association International and 

Association of Air Medical Services to 

conduct Emergency Medical Services 

departures under instrument flight rules 

in weather that is at or above visual 

flight rules minimums from airports or 

helicopters at which a weather report is 

not available from the U.S. National 

Weather Service (NWS), a source 

approved by the NWS, or a source 

approved by the Administrator. 

Grant, 06/22/2005, Exemption No. 

6175E. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–10013. 

Petitioner: Federal Express. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.623(a) and (d), 121.643, and 

121.645(e). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Federal Express 

to conduct supplemental operations 

within the 48 contiguous United States 

and the District of Columbia using flight 

regulations for alternate airports as 

required by § 121.619 and the fuel 

reserve regulations as required by 

§ 121.639 that are applicable to 

domestic operations. 

Grant, 06/22/2005, Exemption No. 

7608B. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–12110. 

Petitioner: Nassau Helicopters. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Nassau 

Helicopters to operate certain aircraft 

under part 135 without a TSO–C112 

(Mode S) transponder installed in the 

aircraft. 

Grant, 06/23/2005, Exemption No. 

8572. 

Docket No.: FAA–2000–8142. 

Petitioner: St. Louis Helicopters, LLC. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit St. Louis 

Helicopters, LLC, to operate certain 

aircraft under part 135 without a TSO–

C112 (Mode S) transponder installed in 

the aircraft. 

Grant, 06/23/2005, Exemption No. 

8489A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–14964. 

Petitioner: Republic Helicopters, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Republic 

Helicopters, Inc., to operate certain 

aircraft under part 135 without a TSO–

C112 (Mode S) transponder installed in 

the aircraft. 

Grant, 06/23/2005, Exemption No. 

6912C. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21301. 

Petitioner: Bell Helicopter Textron, 

Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

21.231(a)(3). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Bell Helicopters, 

Inc., to apply for Delegation Option 

Authorization for type, production, and 

airworthiness certification of transport 

category and special class rotorcraft. 

Grant, 06/17/2005, Exemption No. 

8574. 

Docket No.: FAA–2004–19323. 

Petitioner: Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.619. 

51408 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 167 / Tuesday, August 30, 2005 / Notices 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: 

To permit Delta Airlines, Inc., 

certificated dispatchers and Delta 

Airlines, Inc., pilots in command relief 

from § 121.619 to the extent necessary to 

dispatch flights to domestic airports at 

which for at least 1 hour before and 1 

hour after the estimated time of arrival 

at the destination airport the 

appropriate weather reports or forecasts, 

or any combination of them, indicate 

the ceiling may be reduced from at least 

2,000 feet to 1,000 feet above the airport 

elevation, and visibility may be reduced 

from at least 3 miles to 2 miles. 

Grant, 06/27/2005, Exemption No. 

8575. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–14356. 

Petitioner: TransMeridian Airlines. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.434(c)(1)(ii). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit TransMeridian 

Airlines to substitute a qualified and 

authorized check airman or aircrew 

program designee for a Federal Aviation 

Administration inspector to observe a 

qualifying pilot in command who is 

completing initial or upgrade training 

specified in § 121.424 during at least 

one flight leg that includes a takeoff and 

a landing. 

Grant, 06/27/2005, Exemption No. 

8087A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2001–10028. 

Petitioner: Pemco World Air Services. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

21.325(b)(3). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Pemco’s 

Organizational Designated 

Airworthiness Representatives to issue 

export airworthiness approvals for Class 

II and Class III products manufactured 

at the Pemco supplier facilities in 

Foligno, Italy, and at the Pemco 

distribution facility in Xiamen, China. 

Grant, 06/29/2005, Exemption No. 

7885B. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–14918. 

Petitioner: Aero Charter & Transport, 

Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Aero Charter & 

Transport, Inc., to operate certain 

aircraft under part 135 without a TSOC112 (Mode S) transponder installed in 

the aircraft. 

Grant, 06/29/2005, Exemption No. 

8576. 

Docket No.: FAA–2004–18617. 

Petitioner: Honeywell International, 

Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

21.325(b)(3). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Honeywell’s 

Organizational Designated 

Airworthiness Representatives to issue 

export airworthiness approvals for Class 

II and Class III products manufactured 

at Honeywell facilities in the Peoples 

Republic of China, the Czech Republic, 

Germany, Indonesia, Poland, Romania, 

and Russia. 

Grant, 06/29/2005, Exemption No. 

8504A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2003–15953. 

Petitioner: Boston-Maine Airways, 

Corp. d.b.a. Pan Am Clipper 

Connection. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.434(c)(1)(ii). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Boston-Maine 

Airways, Corp. d.b.a. Pan Am Clipper 

Connection, to substitute a qualified and 

authorized check airman or aircrew 

designee for a Federal Aviation 

Administration inspector to observe a 

qualifying pilot in command who is 

completing initial upgrade training 

specified in § 121.424 during at least 

one flight leg that includes a takeoff and 

a landing. 

Grant, 06/29/2005, Exemption No. 

8122A. 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21160. 

Petitioner: Multi-Aero, Inc., d.b.a. Air 

Choice One. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.154(b)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/ 

Disposition: To permit Multi-Aero, Inc., 

d.b.a. Air Choice One, to operate its 

aircraft (registration no. N694MA) 

without being equipped with an 

approved terrain awareness and 

warning system that meets the 

requirements for Class B equipment in 

Technical Standard Order C151. 

Denial, 06/21/05, Exemption No. 

8571. 

[FR Doc. 05–17217 Filed 8–29–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Government/Industry Aeronautical 

Charting Forum Meeting 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the biannual meeting of the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) Aeronautical 

Charting Forum (ACF) to discuss 

informational content and design of 

aeronautical charts and related 

products, as well as instrument flight 

procedures policy and criteria. 

DATES: The ACF is separated into two 

distinct groups. The Instrument 

Procedures Group will meet October 25, 

2005, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. The Charting 

Group will meet October 26 and 27 from 

9 a.m. to 5 p.m. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will held at the 

Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), 535 

Herndon Parkway, Herndon, VA 20172. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information relating to the Instrument 

Procedures Group, contact Thomas E. 

Schneider, Flight Procedures Standards 

Branch, AFS–420, 6500 South 

MacArthur Blvd., PO Box 25082, 

Oklahoma City, OK 73125; telephone 

(405) 954–5852; fax (405) 954–2528. For 

information relating to the Charting 

Group, contact John A. Moore, FAA, 

National Aeronautical Charting Office, 

Requirements and Technology Staff, 

AVN–503, 1305 East-West Highway, 

SSMC4–Station 5544, Silver Spring, MD 

20910; telephone: (301) 713–2631, fax: 

(301) 713–1960. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (Pub L. 92–

463; 5 U.S.C App. II), notice is hereby 

given of a meeting of the FAA 

Aeronautical Charting Forum to be held 

from October 25, 2002 to October 27, 

2002, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. at the Air 

Line Pilots Association (ALPA), 535 

Herndon Parkway, Herndon, VA 20172. 

The Instrument Procedures Group 

agenda will include briefings and 

discussions on recommendations 

regarding pilot procedures for 

instrument flight, as well as criteria, 

design, and developmental policy for 

instrument approach and departure 

procedures. 

The Charting Group agenda will 

include briefings and discussions on 

recommendations regarding 

aeronautical charting specifications, 

flight information products, as well as 

new aeronautical charting and air traffic 

control initiatives. 

Attendance is open to the interested 

public, but will be limited to the space 

available. 

The public must make arrangements 

by October 7, 2005, to present oral 

statements at the meeting. The public 

may present written statements and/or 

new agenda items to the committee by 

providing a copy to the person listed in 

the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section by October 7, 2005. Public 

statements will only be considered if 

time permits.