alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 146/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 146/2013 of 19 February 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 146/2013                     

# of 19 February 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 February 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 569 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize 

appropriations for sewer overflow control grants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2007 

Mr. PASCRELL (for himself, Mr. CAMP of Michigan, and Mr. CAPUANO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to 

authorize appropriations for sewer overflow control grants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Water Quality Invest5 ment Act of 2007’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SEWER OVERFLOW CONTROL GRANTS. 

7 (a) ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS.—Section 

8 221(e) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 

9 U.S.C. 1301(e)) is amended to read as follows: 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 569 IH

1 ‘‘(e) ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS.—A project 

2 that receives assistance under this section shall be carried 

3 out subject to the same requirements as a project that 

4 receives assistance from a State water pollution control 

5 revolving fund under title VI, except to the extent that 

6 the Governor of the State in which the project is located 

7 determines that a requirement of title VI is inconsistent 

8 with the purposes of this section.’’. 

9 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—The first 

10 sentence of section 221(f) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 1301(f)) 

11 is amended by striking ‘‘this section $750,000,000’’ and 

12 all that follows through the period at the end and inserting 

13 ‘‘this section $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2008, 

14 $350,000,000 for fiscal year 2009, $450,000,000 for fis15 cal year 2010, $550,000,000 for fiscal year 2011, 

16 $650,000,000 for fiscal year 2012, and $750,000,000 for 

17 fiscal year 2013’’. 

18 (c) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—Section 221(g)(2) of 

19 such Act (33 U.S.C. 1301(g)) is amended to read as fol20 lows: 

21 ‘‘(g) ALLOCATION OF FUNDS.—Subject to subsection 

22 (h), the Administrator shall use the amounts appropriated 

23 to carry out this section for fiscal year 2008 and each fis24 cal year thereafter for making grants to municipalities and 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 569 IH

1 municipal entities under subsection (a)(2), in accordance 

2 with the criteria set forth in subsection (b).’’. 

3 (d) REPORTS.—The first sentence of section 221(i) 

4 of such Act (33 U.S.C. 1301(i)) is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘2003’’ and inserting ‘‘2010’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
POINDEXTER, INC. v. BOARDWALK, et al.

No. 443PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2007.

L. Holmes Eleazer, Jr., Charlotte, Fenton T. Erwin, Jr., Lex M. Erwin, Jacksonville, for Poindexter.

Martin L. White, Charlotte, for Boardwalk, et al.

D. Christopher Osborn, Charlotte, for Individual Unit Owners.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of March 2007 by Defendants for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendants (Boardwalk, LLC) shall have up to and including the 25th day of April 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of March 2007."
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of B&G Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David L. Wenner,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Robert C. Cantwell, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ David L. Wenner     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David L. Wenner         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| October 25, 2007   |   |
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Robert C. Cantwell  |   |
| Robert C. Cantwell      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| October 25, 2007   |   |

 

 

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.*

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       9,846,815
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,825,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,806,719
<PP&E>                                       7,224,802
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,466,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,381,629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       165,016
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,466,599
<SALES>                                     20,669,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,669,881
<CGS>                                       19,044,079
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,044,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             332,913
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,854,146)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,854,146)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,530,146)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.34)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Todd M. Raba, Senior Vice President of MidAmerican Energy Company (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: May 4, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Todd M. Raba
 Todd M. Raba
 Senior Vice President
 (co-chief executive officer)
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Merit  Securities  Corporation
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  both,
Stephen J. Benedetti,  the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Kevin
J. Sciuk, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
and for purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

         (1)      The  Report fully  complies with the  requirements of  Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated:  August 20, 2004                    By:      /s/ Stephen J. Benedetti
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Stephen J. Benedetti
                                                  Principal Executive Officer



Dated:  August 20, 2004                    By:      /s/ Kevin J. Sciuk
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Kevin J. Sciuk
                                                  Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 15.1





Club  Corporation  International
Dallas,  Texas

Ladies  and  Gentlemen:

Re:    Registration  Statement  Nos.  33-89818,  33-96568  and  333-08041

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we acknowledge our
awareness  of  the use therein of our report dated October 10, 1997, except as
to the eighth and ninth paragraphs of Note 1 which are as of January 16, 1998,
related  to  our  review  of  interim  financial  information.

Pursuant  to  Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered  part  of  a  registration  statement  prepared  or certified by an
accountant  or  a  report  prepared  or  certified by an accountant within the
meaning  of  sections  7  and  11  of  the  Act.




                                   KPMG  Peat  Marwick  LLP



Dallas,  Texas
February  5,  1998
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3199 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain shipping 

from the harbor maintenance tax. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2008 

Mr. LAUTENBERG (for himself, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. SMITH, Mrs. MURRAY, 

Mr. SCHUMER, Ms. STABENOW, and Mr. VITTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

certain shipping from the harbor maintenance tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF CERTAIN COMMERCIAL AND 

4 BULK CARGO FROM THE HARBOR MAINTE5 NANCE TAX. 

6 Section 4462 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

7 is amended by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection 

8 (j) and by inserting after subsection (h) the following new 

9 subsection: 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3199 IS 

1 ‘‘(i) EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN SHORT SEA SHIP2 PING CARGO.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—No tax shall be imposed 

4 under section 4461(a) with respect to commercial 

5 cargo (other than bulk cargo) that is loaded at— 

6 ‘‘(A) a port in the United States mainland 

7 and unloaded at another port in the United 

8 States mainland after transport solely by coast9 al route or river or unloaded at a port in Can10 ada located in the Great Lakes Saint Lawrence 

11 Seaway System, or 

12 ‘‘(B) a port in Canada located in the Great 

13 Lakes Saint Lawrence Seaway System and un14 loaded at a port in the United States mainland. 

15 ‘‘(2) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection: 

16 ‘‘(A) BULK CARGO.—The term ‘bulk cargo’ 

17 has the meaning given that term by section 

18 53101(1) of title 46, United States Code. 

19 ‘‘(B) GREAT LAKES SAINT LAWRENCE SEA20 WAY SYSTEM.—The term ‘Great Lakes Saint 

21 Lawrence Seaway System’ means the waterway 

22 between Duluth, Minnesota, and Sept Iles, Que23 bec, encompassing the 5 Great Lakes, their 

24 connecting channels, and the Saint Lawrence 

25 River. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•S 3199 IS 

1 ‘‘(C) UNITED STATES MAINLAND.—The 

2 term ‘United States mainland’ has the meaning 

3 given such term in subsection (b)(3).’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

5 The amendments made by section 1 shall apply to 

6 port use after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3154 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3154

    To require the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe a 
standard to preclude commercials from being broadcast at louder volumes 
               than the program material they accompany.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2008

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Federal Communications Commission to prescribe a 
standard to preclude commercials from being broadcast at louder volumes 
               than the program material they accompany.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Commercial Advertisement Loudness 
Mitigation Act''.

SEC. 2. RULEMAKING ON LOUD COMMERCIALS REQUIRED.

    (a) Regulation Required.--Within one year after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commission shall 
prescribe pursuant to the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 151 et 
seq.) a regulation that provides, in connection with any video 
programming that is broadcast or that is distributed by any 
multichannel video programming distributor, that--
            (1) advertisements accompanying such video programming 
        shall not be excessively noisy or strident;
            (2) such advertisements shall not be presented at 
        modulation levels substantially higher than the program 
        material that such advertisements accompany; and
            (3) the average maximum loudness of such advertisements 
        shall not be substantially higher than the average maximum 
        loudness of the program material that such advertisements 
        accompany.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the terms ``video 
programming'' and ``multichannel video programming distributor'' have 
the meanings given such terms in section 602 of Communications Act of 
1934 (47 U.S.C. 522).
                                 <all>
```
___________

No. 96-1637

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Ronald Russ, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: September 4, 1996

 Filed: September 10, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this direct criminal appeal, Ronald Russ challenges his 63-month

sentence of imprisonment imposed after he was convicted of possession with

intent to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and

(b)(1)(B)(i). Russ contends the district court should have applied the

safety-valve provision of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2 and sentenced him to 36 months

imprisonment so he could participate in a special Bureau of Prisons

substance-abuse treatment program. 

Although the Guidelines allow a sentencing court to disregard the

statutory minimum for selected crimes and to sentence within the Guidelines

range when a defendant meets certain criteria, section 5C1.2 does not apply

here because the statutory minimum sentence--60 months--is lower than

Russ's 63-to-78-month Guidelines range. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f); 21

U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(i) (five-year statutory minimum); U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2;
-2-

United States v. Goodwin, 72 F.3d 88, 90 (8th Cir. 1995) (safety-valve

provision provides relief when mandatory minimum sentence is greater than

applicable Guidelines sentence). Section 5C1.2 does not authorize

departure below the Guidelines range. See United States v. Collins, 66 F.3d

984, 987-88 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam) (reduced sentence must be within

Guidelines range and departure below said range is not authorized).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

                                                             Exhibit No. EX-32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18  U.S.C.§1350,  as created by Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of  2002,  the  undersigned  officer  of  Sovereign  Exploration  Associates
International,   Inc.  (the  "Company")  hereby  certifies,  to  such  officer's
knowledge, that:

     (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended June 30, 2006 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

     (ii) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:   October 13, 2006
                                       /s/Robert D. Baca
                                       Robert D. Baca
                                       Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                       Financial Officer
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                Apr-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  Jun-30-1998
<CASH>                        10
<SECURITIES>                  4,438,761
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                4,438,882
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                       4,208,993
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      10
<OTHER-SE>                    200,476
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  4,438,882
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              121,193
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              3,339
<LOSS-PROVISION>              2,864
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            122,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (7,995)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (7,995)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (7,995)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
<FN>
The Company's balanace sheet is unclassified.
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
STEPHEN W. MACMASTER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5257

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed February 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. Brantley S. Clark, Jr. , Judge

.

Stephen W. MacMaster, pro se , Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Julian E. Markham, Assistant Att orney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, SWANSON, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.