alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leroy Nelson, Appellant.

[803 NYS2d 583]

*1122Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered May 21, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of marihuana in the first degree (three counts), criminal possession of marihuana in the first degree (two counts), criminal possession of marihuana in the second degree, and conspiracy in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the convictions of criminal sale of marihuana in the first degree and criminal possession of marihuana in the first degree under counts three and four of the indictment, vacating the sentences imposed thereon, and dismissing those counts of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The People demonstrated that a wiretap investigation was carried out with the appropriate procedures in place to minimize interception of nonpertinent communications *(see*CPL 700.30 [7]; *People v Floyd,*41 NY2d 245, 250 [1976]; *People v Adeola,*12 AD3d 452 [2004]). The defendant failed to rebut this showing, and thus, the court correctly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress the audiotapes produced from the investigation *(see People v Floyd, supra).*

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally insufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt of criminal sale of marihuana in the first degree and criminal possession of marihuana in the first degree (counts three and four) with respect to the drug sales which occurred on May 22, 2001. The evidence with respect to these counts demonstrated that the defendant transported a wooden crate in his silver Mercedes Benz to his home on Ann Street. Thereafter, another individual, driving a blue Honda, stopped at a nearby building on Vanorden Street, came out of the building with a brown paper bag, and placed the brown paper bag in the *1123Honda. It was established that the brown paper bag contained marihuana. However, the evidence did not show that the contents of the brown paper bag came from the wooden crate transported by the defendant, and the contents of the wooden crate are unknown.

With regard to the remaining counts in the indictment, we find that the evidence was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt *(see People v Contes, supra).*Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt on those counts was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Crane, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 21



                   STIRLING COOKE BROWN HOLDINGS LIMITED

                                SUBSIDIARIES



The following subsidiaries are incorporated in Bermuda.

Realm Investments Ltd.
Raydon Underwriting Management Company Limited
Realm Captive Management Company Limited
Realm Underwriting Management Ltd
Stirling Cooke Brown Insurance Brokers (Bermuda) Limited
Comp Indemnity Reinsurance Company Limited
Realm Insurance Services Limited



The following subsidiaries are incorporated in the United Kingdom:

Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings (UK) Limited
Stirling Cooke Brown Insurance Brokers Limited
Stirling Cooke Brown Reinsurance Brokers Limited



The following subsidiaries are incorporated in the United States:

Stirling Cooke North American Holdings Ltd., a Delaware corporation
Stirling Cooke Insurance Services Inc., a Florida corporation
Stirling Cooke (Texas) Inc., a Texas corporation
Stirling Cooke Risk Management Services, Inc., a Florida corporation
Stirling Cooke Brown North American Reinsurance Intermediaries, Inc., a
  New York corporation
Employers and Providers Resource Group Inc., a Delaware corporation
North American Risk Inc., a Texas corporation
Realm National Insurance Company, a New York Insurance corporation
Stirling Cooke Southeast, Inc., an Alabama corporation
World Trade Services Inc., a New York corporation
Stirling Cooke New York Insurance Services Agency Inc., a New York corporation
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 50423]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17039]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:
    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research (DMR) 
<greek-i>1203.
    Dates & Times: September 12, 2005, 1-5 p.m.; September 13, 2005, 8 
a.m.-8 p.m.; September 14, 2005, 8 a.m.-3:30 p.m.
    Place: Synchrotron Radiation Center, 3731 Schneider Drive, 
Stoughton, WI 53589.
    Type of Meeting: Partially closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Guebre X. Tessema, Program Director, National 
Facilities Programs, Division of Materials Research, room 1080, 
National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 
22230, telephone (703) 292-4935.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning a renewal proposal submitted to NSF for financial support 
for the Synchrotron Radiation Center at Wisconsin.

Agenda

Monday, September 12 (at PSL Conference Room)

1 p.m.-2 p.m. Closed--Executive Session
2 p.m.-6 p.m. Open--Tour of SRC, with User Presentations Welcome; 
Introduction; Discussion

Tuesday, September 13

8:30 a.m.-12:10 p.m. Open--Overview of Programs
12:10 p.m.-1 p.m. Closed--Executive Session
1 p.m.-5 p.m. Open--Review; User Research; Safety; Education and 
Outreach; Beamlines and Instrumentation; Plans for the Future; Budget
5 p.m.-6:30 p.m. Closed--Executive Session

Wednesday, September 14

8:30 a.m.-1:30 p.m. Closed--Meeting with Institutional Representatives; 
Review and Prepare Site Visit Report

    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed may include information 
of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical 
information; financial data, such as salaries and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are 
exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the 
Sunshine Act.

    Dated: August 23, 2005.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-17039 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-M
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed June 5, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0431

Lower Tribunal No. F12-20826

________________

Felix Antonio Silva-Martinez,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Carmen Cabarga, Judge.

Felix Antonio Silva-Martinez, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, MILLER and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SS.1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orphan Medical, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John H. Bullion, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ John H. Bullion

John H. Bullion

Chief Executive Officer

May 10, 2004





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Orphan Medical, Inc. and will be retained by Orphan Medical, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH), announces the establishment of the National Commission on Digestive Diseases (Commission).

This Commission shall conduct an overview of the state-of-the-science in the field of digestive diseases research and develop a long-range plan for digestive diseases research consistent with the research mission of NIH. The overall plan will focus on the goal of improving the health of the nation through digestive diseases research and will include specific objectives and goals and a recommended time line for their implementation. Recommendations shall be made to the Director, NIH and to Congress.

                    The Commission shall be composed of 16 members appointed by the Director, NIH and 18 nonvoting ex officio members. Of the appointed members, who shall have a broad diversity of scientific and professional experience, 12 shall be knowledgeable about digestive diseases as members of academic or medical research and practice communities involved in digestive diseases research, including                           ( print page 50378)                        individuals in allied health specialties relevant to digestive diseases research. Four members shall be appointed who have close personal or family experience with digestive diseases or experience with patient-oriented organizations in digestive diseases.                

Unless renewed by appropriate action prior to its expiration, the Charter for the National Commission on Digestive Diseases will expire two years from the date of establishment.

Dated: August 16, 2005.

Elias A. Zerhouni,

Director, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 05-17012  Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 10.2


 


 


 













EXTENSION AGREEMENT


EXTENSION AGREEMENT dated as of July 20, 2016 between Strata Skin Sciences, Inc. (the "Company"), a Delaware corporation, and Samuel E. Navarro (the "Consultant") effective as of July 1, 2016 (the "Effective Date").


Recitals:


The parties entered into a Consulting Agreement dated as of November 4, 2015 (the "Agreement"), under which the Consultant provided consulting services to the Company.  The Consulting Agreement continued in effect through June 30, 2016.  The parties wish to extend the term of the Agreement through September 30, 2016, as provided in this Amendment.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and covenants set forth herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:


1. Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended to extend the termination date of the Agreement to September 30, 2016.


2. The parties acknowledge and agree that all of the terms, provisions, covenants and conditions of the Agreement shall hereafter continue in full force and effect in accordance with their terms, except to the extent amended, modified or revised herein.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first written above.







	 	
STRATA SKIN SCIENCES, INC.

	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
By:

	 /s/ David K. Stone                                                       	 	
/s/ Samuel E. Navarro                          

	 
	 	Title:	 Chairman, Nominating & Governance Committees	 	
Samuel E. Navarro
<PAGE>
                                                          EXHIBIT 21

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

    The following is a list of Solutia's subsidiaries as of December
31, 2000, except for unnamed subsidiaries which, considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant
subsidiary.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Percentage of
                                                              Voting Power
                                                                Owned by
                                                                 Solutia
                                                              -------------
<S>                                                           <C>

CPFilms Inc.................................................      100%

Erste Viking Resins Germany 1 GmbH..........................      100%

Monchem, Inc................................................      100%

Monchem International, Inc..................................      100%

Solutia Deutschland Holding GmbH............................      100%

Solutia Europe S.A./N.V.....................................      100%

Solutia International Sales, Inc............................       99%

Solutia Investments, LLC....................................      100%

Solutia Netherlands Holdings B.V. (formerly Alhadar
  Holdings B.V.)............................................      100%

Solutia Netherlands International B.V.......................      100%

Solutia Systems, Inc........................................      100%

Solutia U.K. Holdings Limited...............................      100%

Solutia U.K. Ltd............................................      100%

Vianova Resins Aktiengesellschaft...........................      100%

Vianova Resins GmbH & Co. KG................................      100%
</TABLE>

                                 59
STATE v. COOPER.

No. COA06-1076.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (04CRS234270, 04CRS234271, 04CRS234272, 04CRS234274).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. CHAPLIN.

No. COA06-96.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (05CRS50267).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
* The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United St ates District Judge for the District of Nebraska. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-2098

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Nebraska. * Angel Lara-Garcia, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: February 21, 2006 Filed: February 24, 2006

___________ Before MELLOY, FAGG, a nd BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Angel Lara-Garcia appeals the 135-month prison sentence the district court * imposed after Lara-Garcia pleaded guilty to drug conspiracy and forfeiture charges. Lara-Garcia argues the court committed re versible error when it found he did not meet the requirements for safety-valve re lief set forth in U.S. S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5).-2- Having carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that Lara-Garcia failed honestly to provide the government with all the information and evidence he had concerning his involvement in the charged drug conspiracy. See U.S.S.G § 5C1.2(a)(5); United States v. O’Dell , 204 F.3d 829, 838 (8th Cir. 2000) (affirming denial of safety-valve relief based on testimony and district court’s own credibility assessments). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


                           Of Chief Financial Officer


I, Alvin A. Hirsch,  the Chief Financial  Officer of Mile Marker  International,
Inc. (the  "Company"),  have executed this  certification in connection with the
filing with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission of the Company's  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 19th
day of May, 2006.


 /s/ Alvin A. Hirsch

------------------------
     Alvin A. Hirsch
Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Fatia I., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 764]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Kings County (Weinstein, J.), dated September 14, 2004, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated June 24, 2004, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and resisting arrest, adjudged her to be a juvenile delinquent and placed her on probation for a period of 12 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated June 24, 2004.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly summarily denied that branch of the appellant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the knife recovered from her. The appellant did not deny picking up the knife in plain view of police officers who, according to the dep*962osition testimony submitted in support of the petition, arrived at the scene in response to an early morning radio call to disperse a large crowd and saw the appellant walking in the crowd carrying the knife. The appellant’s motion papers essentially alleged only, and in conclusory fashion, that the police had no probable cause to believe that she intended to use the knife unlawfully. The court correctly concluded that the appellant’s allegations were insufficient to warrant a hearing *(see Matter of Raoul A.,*240 AD2d 565, 566 [1997]; *Matter of Randy S.,*222 AD2d 509 [1995]; *cf. People v Mendoza,*82 NY2d 415, 427-428 [1993]).

Moreover, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see Matter of David H.,*69 NY2d 792 [1987]; *Matter of Ibrahim D.,*18 AD3d 659 [2005]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and resisting arrest. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the findings of fact were not against the weight of the evidence *(see Matter of Ibrahim D., supra).*

The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit *(see*Family Ct Act § 311.2). H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Fisher, JJ., concur.
STATE v. LESKIW.

No. COA06-1687.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Pitt (05CR52250).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 11

                 TEL-COM WIRELESS CABLE TV
                        CORPORATION

          COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

Third  Quarter and Nine Months Ended Sept. 30, 1997
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       Third                           Nine
                                                                      Quarter                        Months

                                                                 Number        Number           Number           Number
                                                                of Days       of Shares        of Days        of Shares

<S>                                                              <C>      <C>                  <C>         <C>      
Shares outstanding at beginning of year:                            92       2,196,212            273         2,196,212

Issuance of 180,000 shares on restructuring
  of  $2 Million Note Payable on May 19, 1997                       92         180,000            134            88,344

Conversion of Series A Preferred Shares into
1,183,431 Common Shares on Sept. 16, 1997                           14         180,087             14            60,689
                                                                               -------                        ---------

Weighted average shares outstanding for the                                  2,556,299                        2,345,245
period

Net Income (Loss) for the period                                            $(706,331)                     $(1,707,332)

Net Income (Loss) per share                                                    $(0.28)                          $(0.73)
</TABLE>

Note:
The common stock equivalent warrants and options have not been included because
their effect would be antidilutive.