alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Council Decision 2014/22/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/22/CFSP of 20 January 2014 amending Decision 2013/353/CFSP amending and extending the mandate of the            European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/22/CFSP                     

# of 20 January 2014

# amending Decision 2013/353/CFSP amending and extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative for the South                        Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28, Article 31(2) and Article 33 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)On 25 August 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/518/CFSP(1) appointing Mr Philippe LEFORT as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) for the South Caucasus and the crisis in                              Georgia.

(2)On 2 July 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/353/CFSP(2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 30 June 2014 and providing a financial reference amount until 31 December 2013.

(3)A new financial reference amount covering the period from 1 January 2014 to 30 June 2014 should be provided,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Article 5 of Decision 2013/353/CFSP is amended as follows:

in paragraph 1, the following subparagraph is added:

‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR for the period from 1                                 January 2014 to 30 June 2014 shall be EUR 1 040 000.’;                           

in paragraph 2, the first sentence is replaced by the following:

‘The expenditure financed by the amount set out in the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 shall be eligible as from 1 July                              2013’.                           

## Article 2U.K.Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply as of 1 January 2014.

Done at Brussels, 20 January 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Ashton                            

1

Council Decision 2011/518/CFSP of 25 August 2011 appointing the European Union Special Representative for the South Caucasus                              and the crisis in Georgia (OJ L 221, 27.8.2011, p. 5).                           

2

Council Decision 2013/353/CFSP of 2 July 2013 amending and extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative                              for the South Caucasus and the crisis in Georgia (OJ L 185, 4.7.2013, p. 9).
STATE of North Carolina v. Lawrence Allen SCHAFFER.

No. 324P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th day of June 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Pitt County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."
**Exhibit 6.1 **

****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

** **In connection with the annual report on Form 40-F of Virginia Mines Inc. for the year ended February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. 

Date: May 29, 2007 

/s/ André Gaumond André Gaumond President and Chief Executive Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 776/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 776/2013 of 12 August 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 776/2013                     

# of 12 August 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 August 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                        CLUBCORP STOCK INVESTMENT PLAN


     Amendment  made  this  14th  day  of  March,  1997,  by  Club Corporation
International  (the  "Company").

                             W I T N E S S E T H:
                             --------------------

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  maintains the ClubCorp Stock Investment Plan (the
"Plan");  and

     WHEREAS,  the  Company amended and restated the Plan effective January 1,
1995 and subsequently amended the Plan to make certain technical qualification
changes  in  response  to  a  request  from  the Internal Revenue Service; and

     WHEREAS,  the  Company subsequently amended the Plan on several occasions
to  make  other  changes  desired  by  the  Company;  and

     WHEREAS,  the  Company  now  desires  to  amend  the  Plan  to  allow for
trust-to-trust  transfers in the event an Employer withdraws from the Plan, as
permitted  by  Section  14.03 of the Plan, because it  is no longer affiliated
with  the  Company;  and

     WHEREAS,  the  Plan  may  be  amended  by  the  Company  pursuant  to the
provisions  of  Article  XV  of the Plan, and the Company desires to amend the
Plan:

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows, effective as of March 14,
1997:

1.          Existing  Section  16.02  is amended to add a paragraph to the end
thereof:

     "The  Plan  Administrator  is empowered to direct the Trustee to transfer
assets  and liabilities from the Plan relating to such participant accounts as
the Plan Administrator designates to another plan, such transfer must meet the
requirements  of  section  414 of the Code.  Any trust-to-trust transfer under
this  Section  16.02  shall  only  be  made  in  cash."


     IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  Amendment has been executed the day and year
first  above  written.

CLUB  CORPORATION  INTERNATIONAL



By:    Kim  S.  Besse
Its:      Vice  President  Human  Rescources
STATE v. William Henry RAINES.

No. 211A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 12, 2007.

Jonathan E. Broun, Durham, for Raines.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Joan Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of January 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (William Henry Raines) shall have up to and-including the 16th day of February 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of February 2007."
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**Certification**
I, John R. Male, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PVFCapital Corp., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quartly report on Form 10-Q of PVF CapitalCorp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions);
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 8, 2004    /s/ John R. Male   John R. Male Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 982/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 982/2013 of 11 October 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in EU and international            waters of Vb, VIb and VIaN by vessels flying the flag of France         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 982/2013                     

# of 11 October 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in EU and international waters of Vb, VIb and VIaN by vessels flying the                        flag of France                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed October 25, 2023

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22

- 0093

Lower Tribunal No. F19

- 17802

________________



### James Sthubin

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Cristina M.

Miranda , Judge.

Jarlens B. Princilis

, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman

, Senior
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES and GORDO , JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Shearod , 992 So. 2d 9 00, 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)

( “ The existence of contradictory, conflicting testimony or evidence ‘ does not2 warrant a judgment of acquittal because the weight of the evidence and the

witnesses' credibility are questions solely for the jury. ’ ”) (quoting Fitzpatrick

v. State

, 900 So. 2d 495, 508 (Fla. 2005)).
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00457-CR

EX PARTE James PAYTON

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 13, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On July 1, 2011, relator James Payton filed an original petition for writ of habeas corpus 

in this court. However, as an intermediate court of appeals this court is not authorized to grant 

the relief requested. Pursuant to section 22.221(d) of the Texas Government Code, in civil 

matters, a court of appeals “may issue a writ of habeas corpus when it appears that the restraint 

of liberty is by virtue of an order, process, or commitment issued by a court or judge because of 

the violation of an order, judgment, or decree previously made, rendered, or entered by the court 

or judge in a civil case.” TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221(d) (West 2004). However, in 

criminal matters, a court of appeals has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction. Watson v. State, 

96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d); Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CR-4235, styled State of Texas v. James Payton, pending in the 

187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Raymond Angelini presiding.
04-11-00457-CR

- 2 -

835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.). In criminal matters, the courts authorized to issue 

writs of habeas corpus are the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, and the 

county courts. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05 (West 2005). Therefore, we dismiss 

this petition for writ of habeas for lack of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
# County Court Divisions Order (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2013 No. 132

County Courts

# County Court Divisions Order (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

14th May 2013

Coming into operation

19th July 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Order revoked (coming into force in accordance with art. 1) by The Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 2015 (Single Jurisdiction) (Consequential Amendments and Revocations) Order (Northern Ireland)                                 2016 (S.R. 2016/317), arts. 1, **36(d)**
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of O. Victor Edelbrock, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
and Aristedes T. Feles, Vice- President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
of Edelbrock Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (the Company), hereby
certifies that:

(1)  The Companys periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
25, 2003 (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|                                                |  |                                                      
|----------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|O. VICTOR EDELBROCK                             |  | ARISTEDES T. FELES                                   
|O. Victor Edelbrock                             |  | Aristedes T. Feles                                   
|Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer |  | Vice-President of Finance and Chief
Financial Officer
|                                                |  |                                                      
|May 7, 2003                                     |  | May 7, 2003
EXHIBIT 23 

**Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-120092, 333-117082, 333-115667, and 333-111540) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-118178, 333-114642, 333-111393, 333-109006, 333-83804 and 333-58518) of American Access Technologies,Inc. of our report dated March 6, 2007, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of American Access Technologies, Inc. as of and for the two years ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ TEDDER, JAMES, WORDEN & ASSOCIATES, P.A. 

Orlando,Florida 

March 6, 2007 

 

34
IN RE W.B.M.

No. COA06-1614

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Camden (06JT002).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 969/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 969/2013 of 2 October 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Pasta di Gragnano (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 969/2013                     

# of 2 October 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Pasta di Gragnano                        (PGI)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Pasta di Gragnano’                              was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Pasta di Gragnano’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products and foodstuffs listed in Annex I(I) to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012:

### **Class 2.7.****Pasta**U.K.

#### ITALYU.K.

Pasta di Gragnano (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 77, 15.3.2013, p. 25.