alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.36 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC. 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 2001 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 This Amendment No. 1 to the Huttig Building Products, Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was approved by the Board of Directors on April 28, 2003. The Plan was last restated as
of December 3, 2001. 
  
 The Plan is amended as follows: 
  
 1. Clause (c) of Section 7 of the Plan is amended and restated to read in its entirety as
follows: 
  
 “(c) Except as otherwise permitted by the Committee or
as otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, if a Participant’s employment is terminated for any reason other than death, disability or retirement or after a Change in Control, such Participant may exercise any Option in whole or in part, at
any time within 90 days after such termination of employment, but only to the extent such Option is exercisable at the date of termination in accordance with Section 6(b). In no event may any Option be exercised after the expiration of the term of
the Option.” 
  
 2. Effective Date: This amendment shall be effective as of
March 5, 2003.
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael A. McIVER.

No. 377P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Daniel F. Read, Durham, for Michael McIver.

William W. Polk, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of July 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."
Exhibit
32.1
  
 **Certification
by the Chief Executive Officer**
 **Relating
to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements**
 
 
 
 
 I,
Jeffrey A. Snider, Chief Executive Officer, of PAULA Financial, a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that:
 
 (1)  The
Company’s periodic report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005
(the “Form 10-QSB”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)  The
financial statements and disclosures contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 
 
 *  *  *
 
 
 CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 
 /s/
Jeffrey A. Snider
 Jeffrey
A. Snider
 
 Date:  November
14, 2005
  19
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-23-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  OCT-24-1999
<CASH>                                        18,109
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 45,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (2,382)
<INVENTORY>                                   418,199
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              479,348
<PP&E>                                        428,089
<DEPRECIATION>                                (159,244)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                849,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         398,608
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      321
<OTHER-SE>                                    270,228
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  849,126
<SALES>                                       327,255
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              327,614
<CGS>                                         244,026
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 244,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              97,332
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            3,798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,542)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (6,794)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,748)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               5,517
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (5,231)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.16)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3035 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3035

 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                                 1965.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 20, 2008

  Mr. Reid (for Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; which was 
        read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                                 1965.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) Extension of Programs.--Section 2(a) of the Higher Education 
Extension Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is 
amended by striking ``May 31, 2008'' and inserting ``June 30, 2008''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section, or in the 
Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 as amended by this Act, shall be 
construed to limit or otherwise alter the authorizations of 
appropriations for, or the durations of, programs contained in the 
amendments made by the Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2005 
(Public Law 109-171), by the College Cost Reduction and Access Act 
(Public Law 110-84), or by the Ensuring Continued Access to Student 
Loans Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-227) to the provisions of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection Act of 2004.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, July 13, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

      ( print page 40873)    

# PLACE: 

                        The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# STATUS: 

                        This meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to the public via webcast on the Commission's website at                         *www.sec.gov.*

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. The Commission will consider whether to adopt amendments to the proxy rules governing proxy voting advice.

2. The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments to update certain substantive bases for exclusion of shareholder proposals under the Commission's shareholder proposal rule (Rule 14a-8).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: July 6, 2022.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-14693 Filed 7-6-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        dec-31-2000
<CASH>                                                         1,321,417
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  6,947,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     724,906
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       0
<PP&E>                                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               157,600,746
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  0
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    94,163,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 157,600,746
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              41,463,919
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              29,054,724
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             5,307,064
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                7,102,131
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            7,102,131
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                2,056,574
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   9,158,705
<EPS-BASIC>                                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7662

BILLY R. BRASWELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILFORD SHIELDS, Superintendent, Hoke Correctional Institution,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-94-607-5-BR)

Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996

Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Billy R. Braswell, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Braswell v. Shields, No. CA-94-607-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1995).

We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 959/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 959/2013 of 7 October 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 1291/2009 concerning the            selection of returning holdings for the purpose of determining incomes of agricultural holdings (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 959/2013                     

# of 7 October 2013

# amending Regulation (EU) No 1291/2009 concerning the selection of returning holdings for the purpose of determining incomes                        of agricultural holdings (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1198/2014 of 1 August 2014 supplementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1217/2009 setting                                 up a network for the collection of accountancy data on the incomes and business operation of agricultural holdings in the                                 European Union.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John C. Corey, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, of Stoneridge, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ JOHN C. COREYJohn C. Corey, President and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 25, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of The Sports Authority, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 2, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin
E. Hanaka, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that to the best of
my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/  MARTIN E. HANAKA
     ----------------
     Martin E. Hanaka
     Chairman and
     Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. DESPERADOS, INC. and Perez.

No. 629A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 27, 2007.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th day of April 2007 by Defendants for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendants (Desperados & Perez) shall have up to and including the 28th day of May 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of April 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
Exhibit 10.35.5(GENERALE LOGO)**Appendix2**     **BUSINESS OBJECTS SA**  **Mr. John SCHWARZ**  **157 — 159 rue Anatole France**   **agence la défense entreprises**       **92300 Levallois-Perret**   Puteaux, May 23th, 2007**AMENDMENT LETTER**Dear Sir,We make reference to the credit agreement (hereafter called “the credit agreement”)between BUSINESS OBJECTS SA, having its registered office at 157 — 159 rue AnatoleFrance, 92300 Levallois-Perret, with its sole identification number 379 821 994 RCSNanterre and SOCIETE GENERALE SA, having its registered office at 29 boulevardHaussmann, 75009 Paris, with its sole identification number 552 120 222 RCS Paris, madein Levallois-Perret on March 01st, 2006 for an amount of 100.000.000 EUR(one hundred million euros), as extended per an amendment letter dated February 23rd,2007 until May 31st, 2007.As commonly agreed between BUSINESS OBJECTS SA and SOCIETE GENERALE, we herebytemporarily re- extend the maturity date of the credit facility from May31st, 2007 to July 31st, 2007.All other terms and conditions of the credit agreement remain unchanged.This amendment letter is submitted to French law and to the juridiction of the courtin Paris.We kindly ask you to acknowledge the temporary extension as proposed.Yours sincerely,    /s/ Mr. Bernard-Mettil /s/ Mr. John SCHWARZ For SOCIETE GENERALE SA For BUSINESS OBJECTS SA Mr. Bernard-Mettil Mr. John SCHWARZ Manager of La Défense Entreprises Branch CEO of BUSINESS OBJECTSIn 2 Copies**tourariane — 5, place de la pyramide, quartier villon,92088 paris la défense cedex tél. 01 46 96 57 00. ccpparis 19.931.48 w. fax 01 47 76 40 43
 **
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-3561

Lower Tribunal No. 2022-CA-429

_____________________________

DENNIS LONG,

Appellant,

v.

The Honorable DAVID HORTON, County Court Judge,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardee County.

Reinaldo Ojeda, Judge.

August 27, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, BROWNLEE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Dennis Long, Jacksonville, pro se. 

No Appearance for Appellee. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
IN RE H.S.

No. COA07-361.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (03J167, 03JT167).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JESUS E. ELIZONDO,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 15

- 30307

D.C. No.

2:13

- cr

- 00024

- SEH

- 2

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submission Deferred February 7, 2018 Submitted August 6 , 2018 ** Seattle, Washington

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Elizondo appeals the district court’s denial of his motion pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) for reduction of sentence based on retroactive Sentencing

Guidelines Amendment 782. In light of A mendment 782 and Koons v. United

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 21 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

States , 138 S. Ct. 1783 (2018), Defendant was eligible for a sentence reduction

under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) because his sentence was “ based on a sentencing

range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission .” 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). At the original sentencin g, the district court calculated

Defendant’s Guidelines range to be 121 to 151 months. It then noted that were it

not for the Government’s U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 motion, the court “would have felt

entirely obligated to impose a sentence at the upper end of that guideline range.”

However, the court decided to “act favorably upon that motion” and sentence d

Defendant to a term of imprisonment below the uppe r end of the Guidelines range.

The court did not believe that a sentence “less than the statutory minimum of 120

months” would be adequate, so it sent enced Defendant to 120 months.

In light of the above , Defendant’s Guidelines range “played ‘a relevant part

[in] the framework the [sentencing] judge used’ in imposing the sentence,” and

thus, the sentence was “base d on” that Guidelines range, making Defendant

eligible for a sentence reduction

. Koons , 138 S. Ct. at 1788 (alterations in original)

(quoting Hughes v. United States , 138 S. Ct. 1765, 1778 (2018)). Both parties

agree that Defendant is eligible for a sentence reduction . We vacate the sentence

and remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this

disposition

.

VACATED AND REMANDED

.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints John D. Bailey, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ClubCorp, Inc. for the period ended March 19,
2002, together with any amendments thereto, and to file the same with all
exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, this Power of Attorney has been
signed by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated:




Signature  /s/ James M. Hinckley
           ------------------------------------
           James M. Hinckley
Title:     Chief Operating Officer and Director
Date       May 3, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER CHARLES 

BARTOLUCCI,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 

BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 43 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.