alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Audited Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
to be referenced to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         256,986
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  167,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,000
<INVENTORY>                                    180,080
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               616,916
<PP&E>                                          65,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 769,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          188,274
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,917
<OTHER-SE>                                     265,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   769,942
<SALES>                                      1,745,530
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,956,470
<CGS>                                          719,522
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  719,522
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,194,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 42,019
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,019
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    42,019
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
                                                                                                           EXHIBIT 12

                                                    SOLUTIA INC.

                                COMPUTATION OF THE RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                                                (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

<CAPTION>
                                                                   2000       2001       2002        2003       2004
                                                                   ----       ----       ----        ----       ----
<S>                                                                <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
Income (loss) from continuing operations, before income
  taxes and equity earnings (loss) from affiliates(1).......       $ (5)      $(111)      $(32)      $(482)     $(296)

Add:
    Fixed charges...........................................         85          83         98         131        125
    Amortization of capitalized interest....................          7           7          7           6          7
    Dividends from affiliated companies.....................         45          30         25          --         --

Less:
    Interest capitalized....................................        (17)         (2)        (1)         (1)        (3)
                                                                   ----       -----      -----       -----      -----
        Income as adjusted..................................       $115       $   7       $ 97       $(346)      (167)
                                                                   ====       =====      =====       =====      =====

Fixed charges:
    Interest expensed and capitalized.......................         73          72         85         121        116
    Estimate of interest within rental expense..............         12          11         13          10          9
                                                                   ----       -----      -----       -----      -----
        Fixed charges.......................................       $ 85       $  83       $ 98       $ 131        125
                                                                   ====       =====      =====       =====      =====

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges(2).......................       1.35        0.08       0.99       (2.64)     (1.34)

<FN>
--------
(1)     Includes restructuring and other items of $141 million for the year ended December 31, 2004, $343 million for
        the year ended December 31, 2003, $17 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, $86 million for the year
        ended December 31, 2001, and $107 million for the year ended December 31, 2000.

(2)     Earnings for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001, would have to be $292 million,
        $477 million, $1 million and $76 million higher, respectively, in order to achieve a one-to-one ratio.
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7346
JAMES D. HABURN, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RAEFORD MITCHELL; L. HAYES; L. HOY; BELINDA LONG; DAVID STEWART; E. L. WOODARD; WILLIS ADCOCK, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-614-5-H) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James D. Haburn, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haburn v. Mitchell , No. CA-95-614-5-H (E.D.N.C. Aug. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         The following is a list of Solutia's subsidiaries as of December
31, 2005, except for unnamed subsidiaries that, considered in the aggregate
as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

                                                              Percentage of
                                                              Voting Power
                                                              Owned by
                                                              Solutia
                                                              -------------

AMCIS AG..........................................................100%

CarboGen AG.......................................................100%

CPFilms Inc.......................................................100%

CPFilms Vertriebs GmbH............................................100%

Monchem, Inc......................................................100%

Monchem International, Inc. ......................................100%

Solchem Netherlands C.V...........................................100%

Solutia Brasil Ltda...............................................100%

Solutia Canada Inc................................................100%

Solutia Chemical Co., Ltd., Suzhou................................100%

Solutia Chemicals Iberica S.L.....................................100%

Solutia Chemicals India Private Limited...........................100%

Solutia Europe S.A./N.V...........................................100%

Solutia Greater China, Inc........................................100%

Solutia International Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.................100%

Solutia Investments, LLC..........................................100%

Solutia Italia SrL................................................100%

Solutia Japan Limited.............................................100%

Solutia Korea Ltd.................................................100%

Solutia Management Company, Inc...................................100%

Solutia Mexico S. de R.L. de C.V..................................100%

Solutia Netherlands Holdings B.V..................................100%

Solutia Services International SCA/Comm, VA.......................100%

Solutia Singapore Pte. Ltd........................................100%

Solutia Systems, Inc..............................................100%

Solutia U.K. Holdings Limited.....................................100%

Solutia U.K. Investments Limited..................................100%

Solutia U.K. Limited..............................................100%
# Council Decision of 8 July 2014 concerning the removal of the name of a temporary Judge of the European Union Civil Service            Tribunal from the list drawn up by Decision 2013/181/EU (2014/444/EU, Euratom)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 8 July 2014

# concerning the removal of the name of a temporary Judge of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal from the list drawn up                        by Decision 2013/181/EU                     

# (2014/444/EU, Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 257 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Having regard to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and in particular the second paragraph                           of Article 62c thereof,                        

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 979/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 relating                           to temporary Judges of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal(1), and in particular the first paragraph of Article 4 thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)By letter of 7 March 2014, Mr Haris TAGARAS resigned from his post as a temporary Judge of the European Union Civil Service                              Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Civil Service Tribunal’).

(2)Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 979/2012 provides that a temporary Judge's name must be removed from the list of temporary Judges                              on his resignation.

(3)It is therefore appropriate to adopt a decision concerning the removal of Mr Haris TAGARAS' name from the list of temporary                              Judges of the Civil Service Tribunal drawn up by Decision 2013/181/EU(2),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name of Mr Haris TAGARAS, former Judge of the Civil Service Tribunal, shall be removed from the list of temporary Judges                     of the Civil Service Tribunal drawn up by Article 1 of Decision 2013/181/EU.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

P. C. Padoan                            

1

OJ L 303, 31.10.2012, p. 83.                           

2

Council Decision of 22 April 2013 drawing up a list of three temporary Judges for the Civil Service Tribunal (OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p. 49).
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T LO U I S FRA N CI S, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. F E DE R AL B UR E AU OF I NV E S T I GA T I ON , D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 16600 D . C . N o. 1: 06 -C V -009 68 -A W IDLB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A nthonyW . I s hi i , C hi e f J udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r16, 2010 ** B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an d C L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L o u is F r a n c is ap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s o r d e rd is m is s in g h is ac t i on se eki ng t o com pel an i nq ui ryby the F eder al B ureau o f I nv es t i gat i on (“ F B I” ) i nt o the L os A nge l e s P ol i c e D e pa rtm e nt ’ s r e f us a l t o c onduc tahom i c i de 

# FI LED NO V 23 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 16600 2 i nve s t i ga t i on a f

t e rF r a nc i s ’ s br othe rdi s appe a r e d. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , R ob i nson v. U ni ted States , 586 F . 3d 683, 685 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) , a n d w e a f f irm . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed the A dm i ni stra t i ve P roce du re A ct c l a i m f orl a c k of

s ubj e c tm a tt e rj ur i s di c t i on, be c aus e F r a nc i s f a i l e d t o r e butthe pr e s um pt i on tha tthe F B I ’ s de c i s i on nott o c onduc ta n i nve s t i ga t i on i s i m m une f r o m ju d ic ia l r e v ie w . See H ec klerv. Cha ney , 47 0 U . S . 82 1, 83 1-33 (198 5). W e do n otconsi der F ranci s’ s c on t ent i on concerni ng the consentdecr ee , because i tw as ra i se d for the fi rs tt i m e on app ea l and con si dera t i on i s notnece ss ary t o p re vent“ m ani fe sti nj ust i ce . ” T r av e le rs P r op. Cas . C o. of A m . v . C onoc oP hi l l i

ps C o. , 5 4 6 F .3 d 1 1 4 2 , 1 1 4 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) . AF F I RME D.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3294 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3294

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To provide for the continued performance of the functions of the United 
                       States Parole Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States Parole Commission 
Extension Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT OF SENTENCING REFORM ACT OF 1984.

    For purposes of section 235(b) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 
(18 U.S.C. 3551 note; Public Law 98-473; 98 Stat. 2032), as such 
section relates to chapter 311 of title 18, United States Code, and the 
United States Parole Commission, each reference in such section to ``21 
years'' or ``21-year period'' shall be deemed a reference to ``24 
years'' or ``24-year period'', respectively.

            Passed the Senate July 21 (legislative day, July 17), 2008.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3294

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To provide for the continued performance of the functions of the United 
                       States Parole Commission.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

                     THE TRAVELERS LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Travelers Life and
Annuity Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
George C. Kokulis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Glenn D.
Lammey, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ George C. Kokulis
-----------------------------------

George C. Kokulis
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2004

/s/ Glenn D. Lammey
-----------------------------------

Glenn D. Lammey
Chief Financial Officer

August 13, 2004

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       19
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 566/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 566/2013 of 18 June 2013 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction            and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 566/2013                     

# of 18 June 2013

# amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in                        civil and commercial matters                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement                           of judgments in civil and commercial matters(1), and in particular Article 74(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 lists the rules of national jurisdiction referred to in Articles 3(2) and 4(2) of the                              Regulation.

(2)Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 has been amended on several occasions, most recently by Commission Regulation (EU) No                              156/2012(2) so as to update the rules of national jurisdiction.

(3)Poland has notified the Commission of additional amendments to the list set out in Annex I.

(4)Pursuant to Article 2 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark on jurisdiction and the recognition                              and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters(3), this Regulation should, under international law, apply to the relations between the European Union and Denmark.

(5)Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

In Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 44/2001, the entry for Poland is replaced by the following:
          -  ‘in Poland: Article 1103 point 4 and Article 1110 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego) in so far                              as the latter establish jurisdiction exclusively on the basis of one of the following circumstances: the applicant is a Polish                              citizen or has their habitual residence, domicile or registered office in Poland.’                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.

Done at Brussels, 18 June 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 50, 23.2.2012, p. 3.                           

3

OJ L 299, 16.11.2005, p. 62.
STATE v. Darrell Wayne MANESS.

No. 402A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 9, 2007.

Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of March 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Serve Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 19th day of May 2007 to serve his/her proposed record upon the district attorney. The parties shall then proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12. By order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of March 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR TANISYS TECHNOLOGY,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         912,040
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,396,224
<ALLOWANCES>                                   396,465
<INVENTORY>                                  3,987,109
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,053,214
<PP&E>                                       6,594,352
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,571,406
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,412,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,803,736
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,593,077
<PREFERRED>                                  2,593,077
<COMMON>                                    30,318,553
<OTHER-SE>                                (29,304,811)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,412,557
<SALES>                                     12,919,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,919,531
<CGS>                                       10,940,081
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,940,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,645,347
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               396,465
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             293,883
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (941,669)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (941,669)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (941,669)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
        

</TABLE>