alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3282 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3282

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to provide assistance to States 
  to establish and implement response plans to address rising heating 
    oil, natural gas, diesel, and other energy costs, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2008

 Ms. Snowe (for herself and Mr. Kerry) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to provide assistance to States 
  to establish and implement response plans to address rising heating 
    oil, natural gas, diesel, and other energy costs, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Energy Response Act of 
2008''.

SEC. 2. GRANTS TO STATES FOR RESPONSE PLANS FOR RISING ENERGY COSTS.

    Subtitle B of title I of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Public Law 
109-58; 119 Stat. 616) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 129. GRANTS TO STATES FOR RESPONSE PLANS FOR RISING ENERGY 
              COSTS.

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary shall make grants to States to pay 
the Federal share of the cost of establishing and implementing response 
plans to address rising heating oil, natural gas, diesel, and other 
energy costs.
    ``(b) Use.--A grant under this section may be used by a State--
            ``(1) to provide heating shelters for communities;
            ``(2) to provide energy assistance and information to 
        elderly individuals, consumers, and small business concerns;
            ``(3) to provide information to individuals and small 
        business concerns concerning State resources for individuals 
        struggling with rising energy costs; and
            ``(4) to otherwise address rising heating oil, natural gas, 
        diesel, and other energy costs, as determined by the State and 
        approved by the Secretary.
    ``(c) Allocation.--The Secretary shall allocate grants to States 
under this section using a formula established by the Secretary that is 
based on State population and per capita expenditures for energy.
    ``(d) Federal Share.--The Federal share of the cost of establishing 
a response plan under this section shall be not more than 50 percent.
    ``(e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000,000 for each of 
fiscal years 2009 through 2013.''.
                                 <all>
```
STEEN v. KENNEDY.

No. COA07-232.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from Jackson (05CVS597).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos. 333-46939, effective
February 26, 1998 and 333-50767, effective April 23, 1998 on Form S-8 of our report dated April 16, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Star Buffet, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended January 26, 2004 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
January 26, 2004. It should be noted that we have not audited any financial statements of the company subsequent to January 26, 2004, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the
date of our report.

/s/
MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN P.C.

Salt
Lake City, Utah
April 19, 2004

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 23(d)





          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The Board of Directors
Solutia Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-34587, 333-34689, 333-34593, 333-34683, 333-51081, 333-74463, and
333-39972) on Form S-8 of Solutia Inc. and the registration statements (Nos.
333-75812, 333-89818, and 333-99705) on Form S-3 of Solutia Inc. of our
report dated March 30, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Siratsa LLC and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the
related statements of operations, changes in members' equity/(deficit), and
cash flows for the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, which report
appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K/A of Solutia
Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP


St. Louis, Missouri

March 30, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
J. B. WILLIAMS  HOLDINGS,  INC.  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY  PERIOD
ENDED  JULY 1,  2000 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929651
<NAME>                        J.B. WILLIAMS HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               3,745
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       13,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                           595
<INVENTORY>                                         12,114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    28,787
<PP&E>                                               5,112
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3,034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      73,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                9,631
<BONDS>                                             44,856
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            10,804
<OTHER-SE>                                           7,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        73,064
<SALES>                                             45,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    45,120
<CGS>                                               16,477
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       16,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    24,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3,873
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        736
<INCOME-TAX>                                           302
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    736
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           434
<EPS-BASIC>                                          43.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        43.40


</TABLE>
In the Matter of T.M., a minor child.

No. 243A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 9, 2007.

Marie Inserra and Janis Gallagher, Greenville, for petitioner-appellee Pitt County Department of Social Services.

Hall & Hall, Attorneys at Law, P.C., by Susan P. Hall, Morganton, for respondent-appellant father.

PER CURIAM.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
In the Matter of T.M.

No. 243A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 17, 2007.

Susan P. Hall, Morganton, for Father.

Marie Inserra, Conetoe, for Pitt County DSS.

Wanda Naylor, for Guardian ad Litem.

Richard Jester, for Mother.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of September 2007 by Petitioner (Pitt County DSS) for Substitution of Counsel:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of September 2007."

HUDSON, J., recused.
1

The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L.

Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-3402

___________

Dennis Larson Loop, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

United States of America; *

United States Marshal’s Service, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: May 22, 2007

Filed: May 30, 2007

___________

Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Larson Loop appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Following careful de novo review, see

Kasper v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co., 425 F.3d 496, 502 (8th Cir. 2005), we affirm the

grant of summary judgment, finding no reversible error of fact or law. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

______________________________
STATE v. ROGERS.

No. COA06-1633.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from Onslow (05CRS52919, 05CRS52921, 05CRS52923).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
Exhibit 10.46
 SONIC AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN
 AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF DECEMBER 4, 2008
 Section 1. Purposes
  Section 2. Definitions




---



##### 



Section 3. Administration
    Section 4. Eligibility
  Section 5. Incentive Awards and Performance Goals
 In General
 2




---



##### 



Performance Goals
   Incentive Awards
 3




---



##### 



Payment of Incentive Awards
 Conditions on Payment
 Termination of Employment
 4




---



##### 



Timing of Payment
   Form of Payment
 Section 6. Withholding Taxes
  Section 7. Miscellaneous Provisions
 Compliance with Legal Requirements
 No Right To Continued Employment
 Participant Rights
 Unfunded Status of Incentive Awards
 No Transferability of Rights
 5




---



##### 



Governing Law
 Other Compensation Plans
 Section 8. Effective Date
  Section 9. Amendment and Termination of the Plan
  Section 10. Reapproval of Plan
  Section 11. Intent With Respect to Code Section 409A
  6




---



##### 



Section 12. Intent to Comply With Code Section 162(m)
  7
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
Stoneridge, Inc. and Subsidiaries listed below of our reports dated March 11,
2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Stoneridge, Inc. and Subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting of Stoneridge, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2008:





Registration
                
                Description
      of Registration Statement333-149436
                
                Form S-8
      – Stoneridge, Inc. Amended And Restated Long-Term Incentive
      Plan333-127017
                
                Form S-8
      – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Restricted Shares Plan333-96953
                
                Form S-8
      – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Share Option Plan333-72176
                
                Form S-8
      – Stoneridge, Inc. Director’s Share Option
Plan





/s/ Ernst
& Young LLP





Cleveland,
Ohio


March 11,
2009
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

September 10, 2004

Securities and Exchange Commission

450 Fifth Street, N.W


Washington, D.C. 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

The certification set forth below is being
submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission solely for
the purpose of complying with Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. This
certification is not to be deemed filed pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and does not constitute a part
of the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report)
accompanying this letter.

H. Wayne Huizenga, the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer of Boca Resorts, Inc., and Wayne Moor, the
Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of
Boca Resorts, Inc., each certifies that:

1. the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Boca Resorts, Inc.



| |  |                      
| |  | ---------------------
| |  | /s/ H. WAYNE HUIZENGA

| |                                  
| | ---------------------------------
| |                                  
| | Name: H. Wayne Huizenga          
| | Chairman of the                  
| | Board and Chief Executive Officer



| |  |               
| |  | --------------
| |  | /s/ WAYNE MOOR

| |                                 
| | --------------------------------
| |                                 
| | Name: Wayne Moor                
| | Senior Vice President, Treasurer
| | and Chief Financial Officer
# Council Decision of 14 April 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the European Convention on the legal            protection of services based on, or consisting of, conditional access (2014/243/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 14 April 2014

# on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the European Convention on the legal protection of services based on,                        or consisting of, conditional access                     

# (2014/243/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(4), first subparagraph,                           in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 16 July 1999, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate within the Council of Europe, on behalf of the European                              Community, a convention concerning the legal protection of services based on, or consisting of, conditional access.

(2)The European Convention on the legal protection of services based on, or consisting of, conditional access (‘the Convention’)                              was adopted by the Council of Europe on 24 January 2001.

(3)The Convention establishes a regulatory framework which is almost identical to that set out in Directive 98/84/EC of the European                              Parliament and of the Council(1).

(4)The Convention entered into force on 1 July 2003 and is open for signature by the Union.

(5)The signing of the Convention could help to extend the application of provisions similar to those in Directive 98/84/EC beyond                              the borders of the Union, and establish a law on services based on conditional access which would be applicable throughout                              the European continent.

(6)The Convention should be signed on behalf of the Union subject to its conclusion at a later date,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The signing of the European Convention on the legal protection of services based on, or consisting of, conditional access(2) is hereby authorised on behalf of the Union, subject to the conclusion of the Convention.                  

# Article 2U.K.

The President of the Council is hereby authorised, on behalf of the Union, to appoint the person(s) empowered to sign the                     Convention.                  

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 14 April 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

A. Tsaftaris                            

1

Directive 98/84/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 1998 on the legal protection of services based                              on, or consisting of, conditional access (OJ L 320, 28.11.1998, p. 54).                           

2

The text of the Convention has been published in OJ L 336, 20.12.2011, p. 2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANTS'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND NOTES FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 INCLUDED IN THE
COMPANY'S REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-1 AS AMENDED (REG. NO. 333-41028)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         944,178
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  622,070
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    414,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,215,583
<PP&E>                                       8,555,766
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,220,888
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,373,055
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,743,673
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,413
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,255,903
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,373,055
<SALES>                                      1,028,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,028,283
<CGS>                                          352,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  763,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,929,535
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,385,469
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,710,866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,710,866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,710,866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.07)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1000

<S>                                 <C>                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       Other                  Other
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-1999            Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      Oct-27-1999            Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        Dec-31-1999            Oct-26-1999
<CASH>                                  450,230                      0
<SECURITIES>                                  0                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                            57,286                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                              3,103                      0
<INVENTORY>                                   0                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        516,903                      0
<PP&E>                                   70,517                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                            2,873                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        3,338,337                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   219,446                      0
<BONDS>                                 150,000                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0                      0
<PREFERRED>                                   0                      0
<COMMON>                                      1                      0
<OTHER-SE>                            1,270,320                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          3,338,337                      0
<SALES>                                       0                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         89,915                363,428
<CGS>                                         0                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           101,307                274,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       20,199                 11,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (31,591)                77,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0                 32,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (31,591)                44,531
<DISCONTINUED>                                0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0                      0
<CHANGES>                                     0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (31,591)                44,531
<EPS-BASIC>                                 0                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 0                      0


</TABLE>
STATE v. CAUFMAN.

No. COA06-1058.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Johnston (05CRS55697, 05CRS55698).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LOUIS FRANCIS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 09-16600

D.C. No. 1:06-CV-00968-AWIDLB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2010** 

Before: TASHIMA, BERZON, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Louis Francis appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his

action seeking to compel an inquiry by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”)

into the Los Angeles Police Department’s refusal to conduct a homicide

FILED

NOV 23 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-16600

investigation after Francis’s brother disappeared. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Robinson v. United States, 586 F.3d 683, 685

(9th Cir. 2009), and we affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed the Administrative Procedure Act

claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, because Francis failed to rebut the

presumption that the FBI’s decision not to conduct an investigation is immune

from judicial review. See Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 831-33 (1985).

We do not consider Francis’s contention concerning the consent decree,

because it was raised for the first time on appeal and consideration is not necessary

to prevent “manifest injustice.” Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am. v. ConocoPhillips

Co., 546 F.3d 1142, 1146 (9th Cir. 2008). 

AFFIRMED.