alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Council Decision 2014/491/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/491/CFSP of 22 July 2014 amending Decision 2013/189/CFSP establishing a European Security and Defence            College (ESDC)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/491/CFSP                     

# of 22 July 2014

# amending Decision 2013/189/CFSP establishing a European Security and Defence College (ESDC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 42(4) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 April 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/189/CFSP(1) establishing a European Security and Defence College (ESDC).

(2)Decision 2013/189/CFSP provides for a financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of the ESDC during the                              first 12 months after the conclusion of the financing agreement, from 1 August 2013 to 31 July 2014.

(3)On 25 March 2014, the Steering Committee established by Decision 2013/189/CFSP agreed that the period covered by the financing                              agreement should be aligned with the annual accounting period, running from 1 January to 31 December, so as to require only                              one set of accounts from 2016.

(4)A new financial reference amount for the period from 1 August 2014 to 31 December 2015 should therefore be established.

(5)Decision 2013/189/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Article 16(2) of Decision 2013/189/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘2.The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of the ESDC during the first 12 months after the conclusion                           of the financing agreement referred to in paragraph 3 shall be EUR 535 000.                  

The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure of the ESDC during the period from 1 August 2014 to 31 December                        2015 shall be EUR 756 000.                  

The financial reference amounts intended to cover the expenditure of the ESDC for subsequent periods shall be decided by the                        Council.’.                  

## Article 2U.K.Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Ashton                            

1

Council Decision 2013/189/CFSP of 22 April 2013 establishing a European Security and Defence College (ESDC) and repealing                              Joint Action 2008/550/CFSP(OJ L 112, 24.4.2013, p. 22).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CYBERIA HOLDINGS, INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                  107,674
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           420,396
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        566,486
<PP&E>                                  95,415
<DEPRECIATION>                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          683,593
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   268,840
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                                3,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                              0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            683,593
<SALES>                                 2,230,886
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2,230,886
<CGS>                                   723,609
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           723,609
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        1,335,034
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,031
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         177,631
<INCOME-TAX>                            61,979
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     115,652
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            115,652
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .00


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 168 (Wednesday, August 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 51816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17264]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than September 15, 2005.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Patrick M. Wilder, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Marshall and Ilsley Corporation, Milwaukee, Wisconsin; to 
acquire through Metavante Corporation, Brasfield Holdings, LLC, 
Birmingham, Alabama, and thereby engage in data processing and 
management consulting activities, pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(9)(i)(A), and 225.28(b)(14)(i and ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, August 25, 
2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-17264 Filed 8-30-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3218 

AN ACT 

To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain 

criminal history background checks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 3218 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Criminal History 

3 Background Checks Pilot Extension Act of 2008’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM. 

5 Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 5119a note) is amended by striking ‘‘a 60-month’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘a 66-month’’. 

Passed the Senate June 26, 2008. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3218 

AN ACT 

To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to 

obtain criminal history background checks.
NO. 07-05-0388-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL D

AUGUST 15, 2006

______________________________

MICHAEL S. BLAKEMORE, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2000-435180; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pursuant to a plea bargain, appellant, Michael S. Blakemore, pled nolo contendere

to insurance fraud, a state jail felony. On December 4, 2001, the trial court deferred

adjudication of guilt and appellant was placed on five years of community supervision.

After he pled true to multiple violations, on February 2, 2004, the court granted the State’s
1The September 15, 2005 judgment is identified in the record as “Judgment

Adjudicating Guilt After Hearing.” However, the record also contains a judgment

adjudicating guilt signed April 21, 2004. We express no opinion on the validity of the

September 15 judgment. 

2

motion to proceed with adjudication of guilt and sentenced appellant to two years

confinement, probated in favor of five years of community supervision. The court

subsequently revoked appellant’s community supervision on September 15, 2005, and

sentenced him to one year of confinement in a state jail facility.1 By a single point of error,

appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction for a state jail

felony. However, the State maintains he cannot attack his conviction on direct appeal. We

agree and dismiss for want of jurisdiction.

Although article 42.12, section 5(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits an

appeal from assessment of punishment after an adjudication of guilt, it is still necessary to

timely file a notice of appeal. A defendant must file a written notice of appeal with the trial

court clerk within 30 days after the date sentence is imposed. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(c)

& 26.2(a)(1). The Rules of Appellate Procedure provide a fifteen-day window in which to

file the notice of appeal if it is accompanied by a motion for extension of time. Tex. R. App.

P. 26.3. This Court is without jurisdiction to address the merits of an appeal and can take

no action other than to dismiss the appeal if it is not timely perfected. See Slaton v. State,

981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Cr.App. 1998). 
2Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ of

habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See Tex. Code Crim.

Proc. Ann. art. 11.07, § 3 (Vernon 2005).

3

The record indicates appellant filed his notice of appeal on October 26, 2005.

Therefore, appellant’s intent to appeal the April 21, 2004 conviction, which he refers to as

the revocation of his deferred adjudication, is untimely and does not invoke this Court’s

jurisdiction.2 Appellant’s point of error is overruled.

Accordingly, we dismiss the purported appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
##### 



EXHIBIT
3.1
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
ARTICLES OF INCORPORTION
OF
ASSISTED LIVING CONCEPTS, INC.
  ARTICLE I
NAME
  ARTICLE II
REGISTERED OFFICE
  ARTICLE III
PURPOSE
  ARTICLE IV
EXISTENCE
  ARTICLE V
CAPITAL STOCK




---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



ARTICLE VI
BOARD OF DIRECTORS




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII
BYLAWS
  ARTICLE VIII
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
     ARTICLE IX
CERTAIN NEVADA LAW PROVISIONS
   ARTICLE X
AMENDMENTS




---



##### 



ARTICLE XI
CERTAIN PRE-SEPARATION AGREEMENTS
STATE v. CLARK.

No. COA07-545.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 20, 2007.

Certification Date December 10, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (02CRS101021, 02CRS101022, 02CRS101023, 02CRS101024).

Cases reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
STATE of North Carolina v. James Allen MEAD.

No. 110P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

James Allen Mead, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jerry Wilson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th day of February 2007 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Avery County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 8th day of March 2007."
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-167

_____________________________

JAMES STRICKLAND,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

September 28, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Crystal McBee Frusciante of the Frusciante Law Firm, P.A., 

Sunrise, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
### 1 

## CASE NO. 03-15-00022-CV

IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

BEACON HILL STAFFING GROUP, LLC; CODY COX; and BRANNON ROSS Appellants,

v. KFORCE, INC. , Appellee.

On Appeal from 

### the 98th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas

Cause No. D-1-GN-14-004781

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS: Appellants Beacon Hill Staffing Group, LLC, Cody Cox, and Brannon Ross (“Appellants”) and Appellee Kforce, Inc., (“Appellee”), respectfully moves for the entry of an agreed order of dismissal with prejudice. ACCEPTED 03-15-00022-CV 4862461 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/13/2015 1:01:04 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

### 2 I. Appellants and Appellee have resolved all issues between them. The parties hereby request the dismissal with prejudice of the above-styled and numbered case with each party bearing its respective costs and attorneys’ fees.
II. WHEREFORE, Appellants Beacon Hill Staffing Group, LLC, Cody Cox, and Brannon Ross and Appellee Kforce, Inc., request that all claims asserted on appeal be dismissed with prejudice, with costs of court to be borne by the party incurring same. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Rick L. Lambert Rick L. Lambert State Bar No. 11844725 Rick.lambert@uwlaw.com Jennie C. Knapp State Bar No. 24069350 jennie.knapp@uwlaw.com UNDERWOOD LAW FIRM, P.C. 500 S. Taylor, Suite 1200, LB 233 Amarillo, Texas 79105
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS
/s/ Bruce A. Griggs Bruce A. Griggs State Bar No. 08487700 bruce.griggs@ogletreedeakins.com Martin A. Rodriguez State Bar No. 24071129 martin.rodriguez@ogletreedeakins.com Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 301 Congress Avenue, Ste. 1150 Austin, Texas 78701 512-344-4700

### 3 512-344-4701 (Fax) ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this 13 th day of April 2015, a true and correct copy of the foregoing was sent to the following: Via Email Rick L. Lambert - Rick.Lambert@uwlaw.com Jennie C. Knapp – jennie.knapp@uwlaw.com UNDERWOOD LAW FIRM, P.C. 1008 Macon Street, Suite 101 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 /s/ Bruce A. Griggs Bruce A. Griggs

20854104.1
IN RE B.L.J.

No. COA07-59.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Brunswick (05J121A).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32


        CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
            (UNITED STATES CODE, TITLE 18, CHAPTER 63, SECTION 1350)
                   ACCOMPANYING ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF
         CENTERLINE HOLDING COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007


In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Centerline  Holding  Company  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marc D.
Schnitzer,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company and I, Robert L. Levy, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that:


       (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


       (2) The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of our
Company.


By:  /s/ Marc D. Schnitzer                  By: /s/ Robert L. Levy
     ---------------------                      ------------------
     Marc D. Schnitzer                          Robert L. Levy
     Chief Executive Officer                    Chief Financial Officer
     (Principal Executive Officer)              (Principal Financial Officer and
                                                Principal Accounting Officer)
     March 5, 2008                              March 5, 2008


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CHARLOTTE OBSERVER PUB. CO. v. ALVIS COATINGS, INC.

No. COA06-1175.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 17, 2007.

Certification Date August 6, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CVD6320).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                   Exhibit 11

                        PAULA FINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                          MARCH 31
                                                                  1999               1998
                                                              -------------    --------------
<S>                                                           <C>               <C>
Net income                                                         $ 1,279            $1,023
                                                              -------------    --------------
                                                              -------------    --------------

Weighted average shares outstanding for calculating
  basic earnings per share                                           5,929             6,322

Options                                                                  8               478
                                                              -------------    --------------

Total shares for calculating diluted earnings
   per share                                                         5,937             6,800
                                                              -------------    --------------
                                                              -------------    --------------

Basic earnings per share                                             $0.22             $0.16
                                                              -------------    --------------
                                                              -------------    --------------

Diluted earnings per share                                           $0.22             $0.15
                                                              -------------    --------------
                                                              -------------    --------------

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.5


				Management Report

Management of First North American National Bank ("FNANB"), as Servicer, is
responsible for compliance with the servicing requirements in Article III,
subsection 3.4(c) and sections 3.2, 4.1 and 8.8 of the Amended and Restated
Master Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated December 31, 2001, as amended
(the "Agreement"), among FNANB, as Servicer, D.C. Funding International Inc.,
as Transferor, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, for the period March 1,
2003 through November 17, 2003.

Management of FNANB, as Interim Servicer, is responsible for compliance with
the servicing requirements in subsection 2.02(b) of the Interim Servicing
Agreement (the "ISA") among FNANB, as Interim Servicer, Circuit City Stores,
Inc. and Fleet Credit Card Services, L.P., as Principal, with regards to
Article III, subsection 3.4 (c) and sections 3.2 and 8.8 of the Second Amended
and Restated Master Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated November 18, 2003,
between Fleet Bank (RI), National Association, as Transferor and Servicer, and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, for the period November 18, 2003 through
February 29, 2004.

Management has performed an evaluation of FNANB's compliance with the
aforementioned subsection and sections of the Agreement for the period
March 1, 2003 through November 17, 2003.  Management has performed an
evaluation of FNANB's compliance with the aforementioned subsection of the
ISA for the period November 18, 2003 through February 29, 2004.  Based upon
these evaluations, management believes that (i) during the period March 1,
2003 through November 17, 2003, FNANB was in compliance with the aforementioned
subsection and sections of the Agreement and (ii) during the period from
November 18, 2003 through February 29, 2004, FNANB was in compliance with the
aforementioned subsection of the ISA.





/s/ PHILIP J. DUNN
------------------
Philip J. Dunn
Vice President
STATE v. David Edward WILSON.

No. 257A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2007.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jane A. Gilchrist, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney,

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of June 2007 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Wilson) shall have up to and including the 16th day of July 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of June 2007."