alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN RE D.M.

No. COA07-405.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (05JT744).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jolanta Jung-Szayer, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 795]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 23, 2004, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was terminated from her employment as a nanny after she lied to her employer. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ultimately ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her *1174employment was terminated for misconduct and adhered to its decision upon reconsideration. Claimant now appeals from the latter decision.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination that claimant lost her employment under disqualifying circumstances *(see Matter of Goulbourne [Commissioner of Labor],*18 AD3d 1087, 1088 [2005]). Claimant’s employer testified that claimant was repeatedly reminded to carry the cellular telephone that she had been given and to keep the phone turned on during working hours. The employer stated that she returned home early one day after being unable to reach claimant on the cellular phone and found the phone—turned off—in the baby’s room. When the employer confronted claimant, she falsely claimed that the phone was with her and that it was turned on. Although claimant disputes the employer’s version of events, questions of credibility are for the Board to resolve *(see Matter of Garcia [Commissioner of Labor],*16 AD3d 956, 957 [2005]; *Matter of Perkins [Commissioner of Labor],*16 AD3d 756, 756 [2005]). Accordingly, we find no basis upon which to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of
T-NETIX, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, I, Richard E. Cree, Chief Executive Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                           
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with
    the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|
| | 2. The information contained in this
    Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
    financial condition and results of operation of T-NETIX, Inc.



| |     |                    
| | --- | -------------------
| | By: | /s/ RICHARD E. CREE

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Richard E. Cree        
| | Chief Executive Officer

August 7, 2003
# L_2013138EN.01000301.xml

| 24.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 138/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 138/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 475/2013

of 15 May 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Agnello del Centro Italia (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Agnello del Centro Italia’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Agnello del Centro Italia’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 May 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 197, 5.7.2012, p. 29.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.1.   Fresh meat (and offal)

ITALY

Agnello del Centro Italia (PGI)

---
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | **ADVANCED                  OPTICS ELECTRONICS, INC.** |
|                             |                                              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| Date:                  April 16, 2007 | By:                                          | /s/ John                  J.                  Cousins                                          |
|                                  | John J. Cousins                                        |
|                                  | Chief                  Financial Officer          |

----
GRIFFIN v. LOPEZ.

No. COA05-672.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 20, 2006.

Certification Date July 10, 2006.

Appeal from Halifax (01CVS207).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


July 26, 2016


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 248


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect
our evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on July 25, 2016, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in
the Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the
party performing the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-211631) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an
exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                      


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
STATE v. BLACKBURN.

No. COA06-1201.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Catawba (05CRS2013, 05CRS2014).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Alfred Alphonza WALLACE.

No. 597P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Alfred Alphonza Wallace.

Laura Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: 179 N.C.App. 710, 635 S.E.2d 455.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 21st day of November 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of November 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."

HUDSON, J., recused.
# Council Regulation (EU) No 734/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Council Regulation (EU) No 734/2013 of 22 July 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the            application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Regulation (EU) No 734/2013                     

# of 22 July 2013

# amending Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty                                 on the Functioning of the European Union (Text with EEA relevance).
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 32/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 32/2013 of 17 January 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative            prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 32/2013                     

# of 17 January 2013

# amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1), and in particular Article 143 in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,                        

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 614/2009 of 7 July 2009 on the common system of trade for ovalbumin and lactalbumin(2), and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Commission Regulation (EC) No 1484/95(3) lays down detailed rules for implementing the system of additional import duties and fixes representative prices in the poultrymeat                              and egg sectors and for egg albumin.

(2)Regular monitoring of the data used to determine representative prices for poultrymeat and egg products and for egg albumin                              shows that the representative import prices for certain products should be amended to take account of variations in price                              according to origin.

(3)Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 should be amended accordingly.

(4)Given the need to ensure that this measure applies as soon as possible after the updated data have been made available, this                              Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication.

(5)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common                              Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 January 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### “‘ANNEX I

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 181, 14.7.2009, p. 8.                           

3

OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p. 47.
Exhibt 10.4


 


 



UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT OF


THE STOCKHOLDERS OF


ACCELERATED ACQUISITIONS XIX, INC.


A DELAWARE CORPORATION

















The undersigned, being all of the stockholders of Accelerated Acquisitions XIX, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), adopts the following resolutions by unanimous consent in lieu of a meeting pursuant to the by-laws of the Company and the Delaware General Corporation Laws:







RESOLVED, that the Company adopt a 2016 Employee, Director and Consultant Stock Plan in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.







RESOLVED FURTHER, that the officers of the Company be, and each of them individually is, authorized, empowered and directed to take any and all actions required to carry out the purpose and intent of the foregoing resolutions.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have adopted the foregoing resolutions by unanimous written consent on July 20, 2016.







/s/ Timothy Neher                              


Timothy Neher, Managing Member












/s/ Flavio Paltrinieri                        


Flavio Paltrinieri, Chairman and CEO
STATE v. William Joseph MOORE.

No. 460A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 6, 2007.

William F.W. Massengale, Chapel Hill, for Moore.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Frank R. Parrish, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of September 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Defendant (Moore) shall have up to and including the 12th day of November 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of September 2007."
Delma BLINSON, Jerry R. Johnson, Kelliene Fisher, Donald R. Reid, Brian Gossage, Wilford R. Dowe, and Kent Misegades v. STATE of North Carolina; James T. Fain, III, Secretary of the N.C. Dept. of Commerce, in his official capacity; City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina and Allen Joines, Mayor of Winston-Salem, in his official capacity; Forsyth County, North Carolina and Gloria D. Whisenhunt, Chairperson of the Board of Commissioners of Forsyth County, in her official capacity; the Millenium Fund; Winston-Salem Business, Inc.; the Winston-Salem Alliance; and Dell, Inc.

No. 546P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 23, 2007.

Robert F. Orr, Raleigh, Pamela B. Cashwell, Jeanette Doran Brooks, for Blinson, et al.

*377Grayson G. Kelley, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, John F. Maddrey, Assistant Solicitor General, for State of NC & Fain.

Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Pressly M. Millen, Sean E. Andrussier, Melody C. Ray-Welborn, Raleigh, for Dell, Inc.

J. Robert Elster, Adam H. Charnes, Stephen T. Inman, Winston-Salem, Ronald G. Seeber, City Attorney, for City of Winston & Joines, et al.

Davida W. Martin, Forsyth County Attorney, for Forsyth County, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 16th day of October 2006 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of April 2007."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49281-49282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16840]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[MD Docket No. 05-59; DA 05-2087]


Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2005

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 49282]]

SUMMARY: By this document, the Commission announces, the FY 2005 
regulatory fee payment window is now available to accept the annual 
regulatory fees from licensees and regulatees.

DATES: Payments due August 23, 2005 through September 7, 11:59 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Mail payment of billed regulatory fees to Federal 
Communications Commission, Regulatory Fees, P.O. Box 358365, 
Pittsburgh, PA 15251-5365.
    Courier delivery address of billed regulatory fees to Federal 
Communications Commission, Regulatory Fees, c/o Mellon Client Service 
Center, 500 Ross Street, Room 670, Pittsburgh, PA 15262-0001, Attn: FCC 
Module Supervisor. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for payment procedures 
for all other entities.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regina Dorsey, Special Assistant to 
the Chief Financial Officer, at 1-202-418-1993, or by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94e6f1f3fdfaf5baf0fbe6e7f1edd4f2f7f7baf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="522037353b3c337c363d2021372b123431317c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Licensees and regulatees who are required to 
pay annual regulatory fees pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 159 (Public Law 103-
66) must make their Fiscal Year (FY 2005) fee payments by 11:59 p.m. on 
September 7, 2005. The official fee payment window will open on August 
23, 2005, but payments may be sent prior to August 23. Payments 
received after 11:59 p.m. on September 7, 2005 will be assessed a 25% 
late payment penalty. The Commission is required by Congress to collect 
regulatory fees to recover the regulatory costs associated with its 
enforcement, policy, rulemaking, user information, and international 
activities.
    Licensees and regulatees pay differing fees dependent on a variety 
of factors, such as the number of subscribers, number of assigned 
telephone numbers, or revenue, etc. For more information on how the FY 
2005 regulatory fees were determined or instructions on how to make 
payment go to http://www.fcc.gov/fees.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-16840 Filed 8-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-10387 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARTHUR J. MUHAMMAD, also known as Arthur James Jordan Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-98-ALL Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * ArthurJ. Muhammad appeals thesentences imposed by the district court on remand. Muhammad argues on appeal that his plea was involuntary and that the district court erred in calculating the amount of loss. Because Muhammad could have raised these issues in his first appeal but he failed todo so, he has waived it. See United States v. Castillo, 179 F.3d 321, 326 (5th Cir. 1999), rev'd on other grounds, 530 U.S. 120 (2000). United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D March 14, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-10387

2 The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.