alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,544                     439
<SECURITIES>                                     1,670                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,678                  10,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100                     679
<INVENTORY>                                          0                   4,668
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,114                  16,709
<PP&E>                                           1,749                   7,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,177                   1,292
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,092                  34,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,846                  30,390
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             8                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,246                   1,979
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,092                  34,445
<SALES>                                         13,614                  10,901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,614                  10,901
<CGS>                                           13,056                   9,432
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,056                   9,432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,776                   3,598
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   249                     579
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 401                    (41)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,807)                 (1,907)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (66)                       1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,873)                 (1,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,873)                 (1,906)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.03)                  (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.03)                  (0.25)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3337 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3337

   To require the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out conservation 
 reserve program notice CRP-598, entitled the ``Voluntary Modification 
of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Contract for Critical Feed Use''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2008

Mr. Roberts (for himself, Mr. Brownback, and Mr. Inhofe) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of Agriculture to carry out conservation 
 reserve program notice CRP-598, entitled the ``Voluntary Modification 
of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) Contract for Critical Feed Use''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS PURSUANT 
              TO CRP-598.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Agriculture shall carry out conservation reserve program notice CRP-
598, entitled ``Voluntary Modification of Conservation Reserve Program 
(CRP) Contract for Critical Feed Use'', pursuant to the terms and 
conditions of the notice--
            (1) to modify conservation reserve program contracts of 
        producers and operators; and
            (2) to allow harvesting or grazing on agricultural lands 
        enrolled in the conservation reserve.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. MOORE.

COA06-270.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 7, 2006.

Certification Date November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the Harnett (99CRS8258, 99CRS16366, 00CRS16, 00CRS17).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

I, Gregg A. Ostrander, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’ssecond fiscal quarter of 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 8, 2005
IN RE A.J.M.

No. COA06-197-2.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 21, 2007.

Certification Date September 10, 2007.

Appeal from Alamance (99J89).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August                9, 2007 | By:    |                 /s/ David A. Jackson |
|-------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | David                A. Jackson                |
|                          |   | Chief                Financial Officer         |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight      Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.*

Back      to Form 10-Q
AMERICAN ACCESS TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

             STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                                           Year Ended
                                                                                          December 31,
                                                                                      1998            1997
                                                                                      ----            ----
<S>                                                                               <C>              <C>         
Net Loss                                                                          $    (492,814)   $  (256,774)

Cumulative Preferred Stock Dividend                                                    (104,167)             -

Beneficial Conversion Preferred Stock Dividend                                         (781,250)             - 
                                                                                  -------------   ------------
                                                                                  $  (1,378,231)   $  (256,774)
                                                                                  =============   ============

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding                                            2,992,500      3,033,000
                                                                                      
Adjustments to Reflect Requirements of the Securities and Exchange
   Commission SAB 83:
      Common stock issued to director within the period                                       -         50,000

Common Shares Issued to Acquire Omega Metals, Inc.                                      226,470        226,470 
                                                                                  -------------   ------------
   Total Weighted Average Number of Common Shares and Equivalents                     3,218,970      3,309,470 
                                                                                  =============   ============
Net Loss per Common Share                                                          $       (.43)   $      (.08)           
                                                                                  =============   ============
</TABLE>
GARRETT v. WILSON.

No. 302P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 3, 2007.

Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, for Wilson.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of June 2007 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of July 2007."
Motions Disposed and Order filed September 24, 2019

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00410-CV

NO. 14-19-00669-CV

____________

ALI CHOUDHRI, Appellant

V.

OSMA ABDULLATIF, ET AL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-44151

ORDER

Appellant Ali Choudhri filed an opposed motion in appeal number 14-19-

00669-CV asking us to consolidate that appeal with appeal number 14-19-00410-

CV. Appellant also filed a motion to be permitted to use the record from appeal 

number 14-19-00410-CV in appeal number 14-19-00669 if we deny his motion to 

consolidate. Both motions have been pending for more than 10 days, and no response 

has been filed.
2

The court orders as follows:

1. The motion to consolidate, filed September 9, 2019, is granted.

2. The motion regarding the record, filed September 11, 2019, is denied 

as moot. 

3. Each appeal will remain open.

4. Any clerk’s or reporter’s record already filed in one case shall be 

considered to be filed in the other case.

5. Any document meant to be filed in both appeals must bear both appeal 

numbers.

6. Absent a request otherwise from the parties, any brief filed must apply 

to both appeals and is subject to the word limits in Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 9.4(i)(2). For example, appellant shall file a single brief that bears both 

appeal numbers, addresses both orders on appeal, and does not exceed 15,000 words.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Spain, and Poissant.
# C_2013201EN.01000301.xml

| 13.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 9 July 2013

adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2013

2013/C 201/04

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1), and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| — | The Union's budget for the financial year 2013 was definitively adopted on 12 December 2012 (2). |
| --- | --- |

—

The Union's budget for the financial year 2013 was definitively adopted on 12 December 2012 (2).

2

| — | On 2 April 2013, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 2 to the general budget for the financial year 2013, |
| --- | --- |

—

On 2 April 2013, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 2 to the general budget for the financial year 2013,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2013 was adopted on 9 July 2013.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website (http://www.consilium.europa.eu/).

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2013.

For the Council

The President

R. ŠADŽIUS

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 66, 8.3.2013, p. 1, with corrigendum in OJ L 134, 18.5.2013, p. 21.

2

---
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 958/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 958/2013 of 4 October 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 958/2013                     

# of 4 October 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2015

t0623 

# Order

Clerk June 26, 2015

150396

SHERYL L. SPIGNER,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150396

COA: 315616

Macomb CC: 2011

- 002037

- NO

YARMOUTH COMMONS ASSOCIATION and

KRAMER

- TRIAD MANAGEMENT GROUP,

LLC,

Third

- Party Plaintiffs,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

W & D LANDSCAPING & SNOW

PLOWING, INC.,

Third

- Party Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
IN RE A.V.

No. COA06-1565

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Guilford (01JA424, 01JA425).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Boston Properties, Inc., the sole general partner of Boston Properties Limited Partnership (the Company), hereby certifies to my knowledge that the Companys annual report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification shall not be deemed
filed for any purpose, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

Date: February 29, 2008



/s/    MICHAEL E.
LABELLEMichael E. LaBelleChief Financial Officer of Boston Properties, Inc., sole general partner of Boston Properties Limited Partnership
<PAGE>





                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                       InKine Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of InKine Pharmaceutical
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Leonard S. Jacob, M.D., Ph.D., Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Date:    May 9, 2003                        Leonard S. Jacob, M.D., Ph.D.
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Leonard S. Jacob, M.D., Ph.D.
                                            Chairman of the Board and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. EPPS

No. COA06-750.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Durham (04CRS43765, 04CRS5840).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.