alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Man Keung Wai, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Chinawe.com Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [***Omitted pursuant
to extended compliance period] for the small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) [*** Omitted pursuant to extended compliance period];

      (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 31, 2006

/s/  Man Keung Wai
Man Keung Wai
Chief Executive Officer
```
1

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeffrey J.

Keyes, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-2829

___________

Todd Curtis Myers, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * District of Minnesota.

*

Anoka County Sheriff, et al., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: December 29, 2010

Filed: February 17, 2011

___________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota inmate Todd Myers appeals the district court’s1

 grant of summary

judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against the Anoka County Sheriff,

Detention Deputy Andrew Schroeder, and unnamed Nursing Staff and “Dr. on Call”

defendants for causing the delayed medical treatment of a broken jaw Myers suffered

during an assault by another inmate at the Anoka County Jail. 
-2-

After careful de novo review of the record, we conclude that the district court

(i) did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Myers’s claims against the unnamed

medical staff defendants because he failed to identify and serve those defendants for

more than a year after filing this action, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); (ii) properly granted

summary judgment in favor of Deputy Schroeder because, even crediting Myers’s

disputed testimony that he told Schroeder immediately after the assault that he needed

to see a doctor or nurse because his jaw and face hurt, Myers admitted that he

complained of pain in his jaw to a nurse “at the next Med line” and received some

medical attention, so any failure by Schroeder to seek medical attention for Myers was

not the cause of any delay in providing the necessary treatment; and (iii) properly

dismissed the official capacity claims because Myers failed to identify any Anoka

County policy that violated his constitutional rights. Nor did the district court abuse

its discretion in denying Myers’s request for the appointment of counsel. See Phillips

v. Jasper County Jail, 437 F.3d 791, 794 (8th Cir. 2006).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Joanne BEKSHA-BROWN, Administratrix of the Estate of Mark Brown and Individually v. Rodney MASON, Public Administrator of the Estate of Clarence Dicks.

No. 565P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Lance R. Fife, Raleigh, for Beksha-Brown.

Paul A. Daniels, Greensboro, for Rodney Mason.

Thomas E. Williams, Charlotte, for Unnamed Defendant.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 31st day of October 2006 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14(A) AND 15D-14(A),  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Charles Baker, certify that:

(1)   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Monster Worldwide, Inc.;

(2)   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3)   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



(5)   The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



|Date: February 16, 2006 |  | By: | /s/CHARLES BAKERCharles Baker
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- |  | --- | -----------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
STATE of North Carolina v. Lawrence Clay McGEE.

No. 194P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

C. Scott Holmes, Durham, for McGee.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*153*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of April 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-120092) and on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-118178, 333-167305 and 333-149724) of American Electric Technologies, Inc. (formerly American Access Technologies, Inc.) of our report datedMarch 30, 2011 with respect to our audit of the consolidated financial statements of American Electric Technologies, Inc. as of and for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Ham, Langston & Brezina, LLP 

Houston, Texas 

March 30, 2011
PROMISSORY
NOTE








	Principal
Amount: USD$25,000	April 30, 2016






 





For
value received Nogales Resources Corp., (the
“Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of John Gong (the “Lender”) the sum of $25,000
lawful money of United States (the “Principal Sum”) together with interest on the Principal Sum from April 30, 2016
(“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.


 


For
the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year. Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated
and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.2% per annum calculated
monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.


 


The
Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.





The
Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.


 


 


BORROWER


Nogales
Resources Corp.


 


Per:
/s/ Lei Yang


Lei
Yang, President, CEO, CFO
EXHIBIT 15.1





Club  Corporation  International
Dallas,  Texas

Ladies  and  Gentlemen:

Re:    Registration  Statement  Nos.  33-89818,  33-96568  and  333-08041

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we acknowledge our
awareness  of the use therein of our report dated April 24, 1997, except as to
the  seventh and eighth paragraphs of Note 1 which are as of January 16, 1998,
related  to  our  review  of  interim  financial  information.

Pursuant  to  Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered  part  of  a  registration  statement  prepared  or certified by an
accountant  or  a  report  prepared  or  certified by an accountant within the
meaning  of  sections  7  and  11  of  the  Act.




                                   KPMG  Peat  Marwick



Dallas,  Texas
February  5,  1998
BAZZARRE v. HARNETT COUNTY BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

No. COA06-1013.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Harnett (05CVS2036).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 32(a)

 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Jeffry N. Quinn, Chief Executive Officer of Solutia Inc. (the "Company"),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the
                  Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the
                  "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.


Dated: March 31, 2006


                                           /s/ Jeffry N. Quinn
                                           -------------------
                                           Jeffry N. Quinn
                                           Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc.
and will be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0548 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRYAN HUGH HINDMAN ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including February 13, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 7 2022

12/07/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0548
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONALD JOSHUA SMITH, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

OMONIYI AKINTOLA, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 22-16225

D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00420-TLN-EFB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2023**

Before: FERNANDEZ, FRIEDLAND, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Donald Joshua Smith appeals pro se from the 

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging 

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. We have jurisdiction under 

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Gordon v. County of Orange, 888 F.3d 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 24 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 22-16225

1118, 1122 (9th Cir. 2018). We affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Smith failed 

to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant Akintola was 

deliberately indifferent in treating Smith’s medical conditions. See Toguchi v. 

Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1057-60 (9th Cir. 2004) (explaining that a prison official is 

deliberately indifferent only if he or she knows of and disregards an excessive risk 

to inmate health; medical malpractice, negligence, or a difference of opinion 

concerning the course of treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference). 

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
INFORMATION FURNISHED FOR INTERIM PERIODS IS UNAUDITED.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                             184
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            2133
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       5788
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            1807
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              1788
<LOANS>                                           8622
<ALLOWANCE>                                         93
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   18820
<DEPOSITS>                                       16738
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                141
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           856
<OTHER-SE>                                        1085
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   18820
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    353
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  239
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    69
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   661
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 427
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 427
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              234
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    206
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     38
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        31
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.10
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    131
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    94
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        1
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   93
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             93
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ John J. DeeJohn J. DeeChief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President
(Principal financial officer)
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3238 

To prohibit the importation of ruminants and swine, and fresh and frozen 

meat and products of ruminants and swine, from Argentina until the 

Secretary of Agriculture certifies to Congress that every region of Argentina is free of foot and mouth disease without vaccination. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10 (legislative day, JULY 9), 2008 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Mr. ENZI, Mr. TESTER, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. 

MCCASKILL, Mr. DOMENICI, Mr. DORGAN, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. SALAZAR, 

and Mr. NELSON of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 

Forestry 

A BILL 

To prohibit the importation of ruminants and swine, and 

fresh and frozen meat and products of ruminants and 

swine, from Argentina until the Secretary of Agriculture 

certifies to Congress that every region of Argentina is 

free of foot and mouth disease without vaccination. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foot and Mouth Dis5 ease Prevention Act of 2008’’. 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3238 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON IMPORTATION OF ARGENTINE 

2 RUMINANTS AND SWINE UNTIL ARGENTINA 

3 IS FREE OF FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE 

4 WITHOUT VACCINATION. 

5 The Secretary of Agriculture shall prohibit the impor6 tation into the United States of any ruminant or swine, 

7 or any fresh (including chilled or frozen) meat or product 

8 of any ruminant or swine, that is born, raised, or slaugh9 tered in Argentina until the Secretary certifies to Congress 

10 that every region of Argentina is free of foot and mouth 

11 disease without vaccination. 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS