alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SWIFT ENERGY
PENSION PARTNERS 1994B LTD'S BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS CONTAINED
IN ITS FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEP-30-1996.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,669
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,805
<PP&E>                                       3,662,493
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,349,177)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,390,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,173
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,384,948
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,390,121
<SALES>                                        414,577
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               414,626
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  202,143<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                158,796
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            158,796
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   158,796
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES LEASE OPERATING EXPENSES, PRODUCTION TAXES AND DEPRECIATION AND
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE. EXCLUDES GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE AND INTEREST EXPENSE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3159 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3159

To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United 
 States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2008

   Mr. Coburn (for himself, Mr. McCain, Mr. Kyl, Mrs. Hutchison, Mr. 
 Cornyn, Mr. Ensign, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Chambliss, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Crapo, 
Mr. Enzi, Mr. Allard, Mr. Graham, Mr. Burr, Mrs. Dole, Mr. Sununu, Mr. 
    Thune, Mr. Vitter, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Wicker, Mr. 
 Sessions, and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require Congress to specify the source of authority under the United 
 States Constitution for the enactment of laws, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enumerated Powers Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIFICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY FOR ENACTMENT OF LAW.

    (a) Constitutional Authority for This Act.--This Act is enacted 
pursuant to the power granted Congress under article I, section 8, 
clause 18, of the United States Constitution and the power granted to 
each House of Congress under article I, section 5, clause 2, of the 
United States Constitution.
    (b) Constitutional Authority Statement Required.--Chapter 2 of 
title 1, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 102 
the following new section:
``Sec. 102a. Constitutional authority clause
    ``Each Act of Congress shall contain a concise and definite 
statement of the constitutional authority relied upon for the enactment 
of each portion of that Act. The failure to comply with this section 
shall give rise to a point of order in either House of Congress. The 
availability of this point of order does not affect any other available 
relief.''
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 2 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 102 the following new item:

``102a. Constitutional authority clause.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            72,011
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       3,182
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  80,053
<CASH>                                           4,203
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 411
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,365
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              7,273
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  56,827
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,365
<PREMIUMS>                                      18,117
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,004
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 293
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,526
<BENEFITS>                                      14,613
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      3,693
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             2,835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,895
<INCOME-TAX>                                       586
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,310
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,310
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   212.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   212.47
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  53,013
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             16,023
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (1,410)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               5,366
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                11,793
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 50,467
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Majority and 

Dissenting Opinions filed August 12, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00399-CV

IVAN PEREZ, Appellant

V.

CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-70048

MEMORANDUM DISSENTING OPINION

The prayer to appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal includes the 

following: “For these reasons, Appellant asks the Court to grant this Unopposed 

Motion to Dismiss, with each party bearing own costs on appeal.” The certificate 

of conference reflects that appellee’s counsel is not opposed to the motion.
2

The court properly grants the motion. But in the judgment dismissing the 

appeal, the Court errs in the taxation of costs. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

42.1(d) states, “Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the 

appellant.” Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

I could write about why “not opposed” is different from “agree.” I suspect 

most lawyers would be legitimately concerned if an appellate court held “not 

opposed” was synonymous with “agree.” I also suspect a lot of lawyers would stop 

saying they were “not opposed,” they would not necessarily “agree,” and they

would likely offer “no response.” That would be a big waste of time.

But a picture can be worth the proverbial 1,000 words:

Nothing indicates the City agreed “with each party bearing own costs on appeal.”

The court is simply wrong to disregard Rule 42.1(d).
3

I dissent to the portion of the judgment taxing costs against the City of 

Houston without its agreement.

/s/ Charles A. Spain

Justice

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain (Spain, J., dissenting).
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3103 

To amend the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation Act to allow 

certain extraordinary payments in connection with the International 

Space Station. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 9, 2008 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself and Mr. LUGAR) (by request) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To amend the Iran, North Korea, and Syria Nonproliferation 

Act to allow certain extraordinary payments in connection with the International Space Station. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘International Space 

5 Station Payments Act of 2008’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 3103 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO MAKE CERTAIN EXTRAORDINARY 

2 PAYMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE 

3 INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION. 

4 Section 7(1)(B) of the Iran, North Korea, and Syria 

5 Nonproliferation Act (Public Law 106–178; 50 U.S.C. 

6 1701 note) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘except that such term does not 

8 mean payments’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘except 

9 that such term does not mean— 

10 ‘‘(i) payments’’; 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘or contract related thereto.’’ 

12 and inserting ‘‘or contract related thereto; or’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

14 clause: 

15 ‘‘(ii) payments in cash or in kind 

16 made or to be made by the United States 

17 Government between January 1, 2012, and 

18 reentry into Earth’s atmosphere of the 

19 International Space Station at its end of 

20 life, for work to be performed or services 

21 to be rendered during that period nec22 essary to meet United States obligations 

23 under the Agreement Concerning Coopera24 tion on the Civil International Space Sta25 tion, with annex, signed at Washington 

26 January 29, 1998, and entered into force 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•S 3103 IS

1 March 27, 2001, or any protocol, agree2 ment, memorandum of understanding, or 

3 contract related thereto, except that this 

4 clause does not allow for payments in cash 

5 or in kind to be made by the United States 

6 Government for— 

7 ‘‘(I) any cargo services provided 

8 by a Progress vehicle; or 

9 ‘‘(II) any crew transportation or 

10 rescue services provided by a Soyuz 

11 vehicle after— 

12 ‘‘(aa) the Orion Crew Explo13 ration Vehicle reaches full oper14 ational capability; or 

15 ‘‘(bb) a United States com16 mercial provider of crew trans17 portation and rescue services 

18 demonstrates the capability to 

19 meet mission requirements of the 

20 International Space Station.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains Summary Financial Information extracted from the
Accompanying Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such Financial Statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000929547
<NAME> INKINE PHARMACEUTICAL
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           3,312
<SECURITIES>                                     4,267
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,673
<PP&E>                                             503
<DEPRECIATION>                                     153
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,023
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,385
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             3
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,635
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,023
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,949
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  23
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,743)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE TRAVELERS LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               2,263,067
<CASH>                                           1,741
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         127,487
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,850,051
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                967,964
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        2,274,366
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     502,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,850,051
<PREMIUMS>                                      12,530
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             81,781
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               7,215
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  11,559
<BENEFITS>                                      65,534
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      7,371
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                             6,733
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,447
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,767
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,767
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
SETZER v. LEGACY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.

No. COA06-1353.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Guilford (01CVS8403).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **3 -**  **6127**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. C ORY NEWMAN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. G. Ross Anderson, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 6:04

- cr - 01127

- GRA

- 8 )

Submitted : March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Cory Newman , Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard , Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Cory Newman seeks to appeal the district c ourt’s order construing his “Motion for My Relief” as a 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion and dismissing it as successive, and its subsequent order denying reconsideration . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a con stitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Newman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argu ment because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Brian
Ainsworth, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert Allen, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of his knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. By:
    
    /s/ Brian Ainsworth
Brian Ainsworth
Chief Executive Officer
May 21, 2004By:
    
    /s/ Robert Allen
Robert Allen
Chief Financial Officer
May 21, 2004
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 67
Exhibit 32.1



TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.



OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



January 14, 2004



The undersigned Robert M. McMurrey duly appointed and incumbent officer of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the
Corporation), in connection with the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), does
hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that to the best of his knowledge:



1. The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Corporation.



|                       |  | 
|---------------------- |  | 
|Date: January 14, 2004 |  | 
|                       |  | 



33
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS**oFFIC!fA~ 6U~r~\ICf::AS~L** **sT~TION** .A**~I** ·";**~s t.~JifhosTAGE))PITNEYBoWEs**  

### STATE OF TEXAS

## 4%~~<~ . · ·;

## {(([.~,.**f~~ff** PENAL TV FOR**-f~-~~~y'~:·,,<\,.** 

### --:**~** 

# == s PRIVATE USE

## ;1t·~r-,:z~~~;,· 

# ··**~ ~~~~** **701** 

### $

## (0)(0)(0).~1



## .**~Sl .:~iji:~** **,~** 

## ·., 0001401623 JUN. 17. 2015 6/17/2015**I'{~:~;** <(.·· ;c·A 

### 7**zr··.,~** JONES, ISAAC JAMES

# ,\\~ot**•,N}r.~1{1~~:1:~~** WR-19, 143-08 The Court has dismissed

### withoO\~ritt~~<1[_9,~r·trjs subsequent application for a writ of habeas corpus. TEX. CODE**CRI~-~0~:t;i\7ft.** 11.07, Sec. 4(a)-(c).

. .

### ·"'~ Abel Acosta, Clerk

t·1EEN36 77078 ISAAC**JA~..:l,<?NES** .. · ·**SOUTHEAS'r"l'~fo...JRANSITIONAL** CENTER
10950

## BEA~~1iib~AY ANK 

# I

.

## HOUSTO~Oif 

# j 

# l**o.~vt** )



## . _IJ 

# 2ots ·
. 1



## . . . . l-lcfL411VJ

. . ·.
. . .1. 

## !Eb

. '• Jl,;lljji•IJ'IIII'"III.j.l 

### •1 1 

# •111nl' ul•u.llt;lj 

### i 1 1 

### ,,IJI,ul,; ··**~'**
IN RE D.K.

No. COA04-1583.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from New Hanover (02J403).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed as to respondent mother. Affirmed as to respondent father.