alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 878/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 878/2013 of 12 September 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 878/2013                     

# of 12 September 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 September 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. MALDONADO.

No. COA07-504.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from Craven (06CRS52152, 06CRS52153, 06CRS52273, 06CRS52274, 06CRS52276, 06CRS52277, 06CRS52301, 06CRS53474, 06CRS53475, 06CRS53476).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard F. Karwan, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 436]

Cardona, P.J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered October 16, 2003, convicting de*1218fendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree.

Defendant agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging him with criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree in connection with his alleged theft of a truck. He pleaded guilty to this charge and waived his right to appeal. Although no specific sentence was promised, County Court agreed to a cap of *V-k*to 4 years in prison. In addition, County Court agreed to allow defendant to participate in an inpatient drug treatment program before facing any prison time. Defendant began the program, but left before completing it, resulting in the issuance of a bench warrant. He was subsequently sentenced to 1 to 3 years in prison and now appeals.

Initially, we note that defendant’s challenge to the effectiveness of his trial counsel survives his waiver of the right to appeal only to the extent that it impacts the voluntariness of his plea *(see People v Sales,*18 AD3d 962, 962-963 [2005]; *People v Jones,*18 AD3d 964, 965 [2005], *lv denied*5 NY3d 790 [2005]). In support of his assertion that counsel was ineffective, defendant takes issue with counsel’s failure to engage in certain discovery, make pretrial motions, require the prosecution to present its case to a grand jury and obtain a more favorable sentence. None of these alleged deficiencies bears upon the voluntariness of defendant’s plea *(see e.g. People v Daniels,*16 AD3d 780, 780 [2005]). In any event, defendant’s failure to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction renders this claim unpreserved *(see People v Sales, supra*at 963; *People v Jones, supra*at 965). Furthermore, inasmuch as we find that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and intelligent plea and waiver of the right to appeal, we decline to review his claim that the sentence was harsh and excessive *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]; *People v Clow,*10 AD3d 803, 804 [2004]). We additionally find no basis to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction in that regard *(see People v Schwing,*13 AD3d 725, 726 [2004]).

Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 21



                       List of Subsidiaries of the Company

1.   Aegis Realty Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

2.   Barclay/Aegis Inc., a Delaware corporation



         List of Subsidiaries of Aegis Realty Operating Partnership, L.P.
         ----------------------------------------------------------------

1.   Summit Insured Equity L.P., a Delaware limited partnership

2.   Summit Insured Equity L.P. II, a Delaware limited partnership

3.   Barclay/Aegis Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

4.   Aegis Waterford, L.L.C. , a Delaware limited liability company

5.   Aegis Oxford, L.L.C., a Mississippi limited liability company

6.   Southgate Partners Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership

7.   Southgate/Aegis L.L.C., , a Delaware limited liability company

8.   Crossroads East Shopping Center, Ltd., an Ohio limited liability company

9.   Aegis Realty Holding Partnership, L.P. , a Delaware limited partnership
Exhibit








Exhibit 10-n-2


Schedule of Executives of the Company who are a party to the Change of Control Agreement:


Three-Year Agreement


		
	1.
	Patrick E. Allen


		
	2.
	Bruce M. King


		
	3.
	Nan Mattai


		
	4.
	Robert K. Ortberg


		
	5.
	Kent L. Statler


		
	6.
	Robert A. Sturgell






Two-Year Agreement


		
	1.
	Tatum J. Buse


		
	2.
	Philip J. Jasper


		
	3.
	Jeffrey D. MacLauchlan


		
	4.
	Colin R. Mahoney


		
	5.
	David J. Nieuwsma


		
	6.
	Robert J. Perna


		
	7.
	Jeffrey A. Standerski


		
	8.
	Douglas E. Stenske
`[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3180 Referred in House (RFH)]







110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3180


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2008

            Referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT


 
 To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 
                                 1965.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) Extension of Programs.--Section 2(a) of the Higher Education 
Extension Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is 
amended by striking ``June 30, 2008'' and inserting ``July 31, 2008''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section, or in the 
Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 as amended by this Act, shall be 
construed to limit or otherwise alter the authorizations of 
appropriations for, or the durations of, programs contained in the 
amendments made by the Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2005 
(Public Law 109-171), by the College Cost Reduction and Access Act 
(Public Law 110-84), or by the Ensuring Continued Access to Student 
Loans Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-227) to the provisions of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection Act of 2004.

            Passed the Senate June 23, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                NANCY ERICKSON,

                                                             Secretary.`
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANICAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           136,199
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       3,405
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 167,004
<CASH>                                           8,574
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 176
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,405
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 256,430
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                153,725
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             26,368
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                              479
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 15,692
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   256,430
<PREMIUMS>                                      27,626
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              2,507
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (117)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   1,689
<BENEFITS>                                      23,426
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      9,545
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               248
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,608)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (575)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,033)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 147,425
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             22,985
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                  441
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               2,195
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                26,056
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                142,600
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
PENLAND v. PENLAND.

No. COA07-303.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 16, 2007.

Certification Date November 5, 2007.

Appeal from Buncombe (02CVD4903).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
STATE v. ALBRITTAIN.

No. COA06-640.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Wayne (05CRS51688, 05CRS51689, 05CRS51690, 05CRS51691, 05CRS51694, 05CRS51709, 05CRS51833).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE J.B.
WILLIAMS HOLDINGS, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE
30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          22,054
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                       320
<INVENTORY>                                      4,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,150
<PP&E>                                           2,081
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,928
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,603
<BONDS>                                         50,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,600
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,928
<SALES>                                         23,513
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,513
<CGS>                                            7,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    763
<INCOME-TAX>                                       298
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                763
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       465
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
In re Eula ENGLISH, Foreclosure of Deed of Trust Dated January 20, 1989, Recorded in Book 3715 Page 1307, In the Guilford County Registry. Appealed by Jacqueline Acey.

No. 249P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Jacqueline Acey, pro se.

Carl Wright, Guardian ad Litem, High Point, for Heirs of Eula English.

Christopher C. Finan, High Point, for Household Realty Corp.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner (Jacqueline Acey) on the 29th day of May 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
STATE v. Samuel Clint BLANCHER.

No. 109P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Rick Shaffer, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: 170 N.C.App. 171, 611 S.E.2d 445.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of February 2007 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review Under G.S. 7A-31":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."

HUDSON, J., recused.
# The Enterprise Act 2002 (Part 8 EU Infringements) Order 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 3168

Consumer Protection

# The Enterprise Act 2002 (Part 8 EU Infringements) Order 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

11th December 2013

Laid before Parliament

13th December 2013

Coming into force

13th June 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Order revoked (27.11.2014) by The Enterprise Act 2002 (Part 8 EU Infringements) Order 2014 (S.I. 2014/2908), **art. 2**
```

EXHIBIT 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Vivian Chu, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Chinawe.com Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) [***Omitted pursuant
to extended compliance period] for the small business issuer and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      (b) [*** Omitted pursuant to extended compliance period];

      (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5.    The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 31, 2006

/s/  Vivian Chu
Vivian Chu
Chief Financial Officer
```
### /662-(3 &$• A- c«*s*Mo°°ii-ti-vst-cz- ORIGINAL Tlli'aJ roorT (jtibissvAMo D~hDCr- U-WoM

-V ©OUBTOFCRI^INALAPPEALS CRTNSZ-NfaL fiffBAt-S STATE oFT^yas FEB 122015 XMTHE STATE OF at^fl -E£XA££|LEO-iN AMAcosta,Cf©rk COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS N\0TZON fog /?EH£At\TM FEB12»

Abel Acosta, Clerk H>Thft ttefl/atrAPLF rTuD&ES QF THE C nvRToF c^mt *ai kWt*i eg fn<?l/e$ th',$ HONORABIE CovflT f^jr^r-t^ /*?fWsr- ^M-^a^y cpf •fcQgy/4 JLus +k& Cm/H* +he -fa/leus/rui g %n&r 

### -X__ Cwj of7w*/lS entity Te^s&r ih* ofPene*. ^AjyAL/^^^^^ 

### h CAM** N**% D-h&C-H-fotOW.Tfl* UtiTitHt.*, ^{fmJ ie+hi.to^+efajto^n U^ JfatCM PtfTrrcr *y<0~VaS *tflM**+o* IO-3l-l*tifn.Z^£*,M*l\-lhZt*-QL.



### fU CoUfT tfAflmtfil+r.fzro* *ndsUa*JWf4£ oubStmJ^fhJ from +he vote*
Exhibit 12

Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preference Dividends

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                                       2000             1999          1998
                                                                  ------------       ----------      ------------

<S>                                                                <C>             <C>             <C>
Interest expense                                                   $  4,216,160    $  1,749,225    $  1,504,334
Minority interest in income of subsidiary                            10,074,463       5,602,264       1,563,999
Recurring fees related to TOPs program                                2,197,557       1,416,756         454,919
Amortized capitalized costs related to indebtedness                     478,951         345,282         158,572
Preference security dividend requirements of consolidated
  subsidiaries                                                        8,593,956       3,014,375               -
                                                                   ------------    ------------    ------------

  Total fixed charges                                              $ 25,561,087    $ 12,127,902    $  3,681,824
                                                                   ============    ============    ============


Net income before minority interest                                $ 48,759,475    $ 31,798,457    $ 23,589,871
Add:  Total fixed charges                                            25,561,087      12,127,902       3,681,824
Less:  Preference security dividend requirements of consolidated
  subsidiaries                                                       (8,593,956)     (3,014,375)              -
                                                                   ------------    ------------    ------------
Earnings                                                           $ 65,726,606    $ 40,911,984    $ 27,271,695
                                                                   ============    ============    ============

Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and
  Preference Dividends                                                      3:1             3:1             7:1

For the purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
preference dividends, earnings were calculated using income before minority
interest adding back total fixed charges less preference security dividend
requirements of consolidated subsidiaries. Fixed charges consist of interest
expense, minority interest in income of subsidiary, recurring fees and
amortization of capitalized costs related to indebtedness and preference
security dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries. There were no
periods in which earnings were insufficient to cover combined fixed charges and
preference dividends.
</TABLE>