alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COLEY, et al. v. STATE of NC, et al.

No. 607A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 7, 2006.

Philip R. Isley, G. Eugene Boyce, Raleigh, for Diana L. Coley, et al.

Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of March 2006 by Defendants to Strike Plaintiff Appellants' Reply Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 7th day of March 2006."
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11-1
 
                               STAR BUFFET, INC.
                            COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS
                                   PER SHARE
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    PERIOD ENDED
                                                              -------------------------
                                                              JANUARY 26,   JANUARY 27,
                                                                 1998          1997
                                                              -----------   -----------
<S>                                                           <C>           <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net Income..................................................  $2,699,000    $  470,000
                                                              ----------    ----------
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
  the year..................................................   3,515,000     2,600,000
                                                              ----------    ----------
Basic Earnings per Share....................................  $     0.77    $     0.18
                                                              ==========    ==========
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
Net Income..................................................  $2,699,000    $  470,000
                                                              ----------    ----------
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
  the year..................................................   3,515,000     2,600,000
  Incremental common shares attributable to exercise of
     stock options..........................................      13,000            --
                                                              ----------    ----------
                                                               3,528,000     2,600,000
Diluted Earnings per Share..................................  $     0.76    $     0.18
                                                              ==========    ==========
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 15.1





Club  Corporation  International
Dallas,  Texas

Ladies  and  Gentlemen:

Re:    Registration  Statement  Nos.  33-89818,  33-96568  and  333-08041

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we acknowledge our
awareness  of  the use therein of our report dated July 18, 1997, except as to
the  seventh and eighth paragraphs of Note 1 which are as of January 16, 1998,
related  to  our  review  of  interim  financial  information.

Pursuant  to  Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered  part  of  a  registration  statement  prepared  or certified by an
accountant  or  a  report  prepared  or  certified by an accountant within the
meaning  of  sections  7  and  11  of  the  Act.




                                   KPMG  Peat  Marwick  LLP



Dallas,  Texas
February  5,  1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1997
<CASH>                                         3,204,693
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  56,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    619,883
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,049,230
<PP&E>                                         369,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,432,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,644,844
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          2,685,000
<PREFERRED>                                    2,500,000
<COMMON>                                       8,811
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,530,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,432,632
<SALES>                                        65,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               65,417
<CGS>                                          33,893
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  33,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               288,964
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             30,085
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,078,041)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,078,041)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,078,041)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.26)
        


</TABLE>
STATE v. Freeman HANKINS.

No. 523P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of May 2007 by Defendant for Access to the Courts to Review Modern Day Slavery:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."
STATE v. PHILLIPS.

COA06-36.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Alamance (04CRS56834, 04CRS56835).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Imperial  Petroleum  Recovery
Corporation; (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending October 31, 2005
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Alan Springer,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify,  to such officer's  knowledge,  that pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:                                                          March 20, 2006
   --------------------------------------------------

   Alan B. Springer

   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1201/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1201/2013 of 25 November 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1201/2013                     

# of 25 November 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**538 CAF 11-00502**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ANGEL M. HAYNES AND ROBERT HAYNES, PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER
ONONDAGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, AND SUZANNE M. LOCKWOOD, RESPONDENT-PETITIONER-APPELLANT.

KELLY M. CORBETT, FAYETTEVILLE, FOR RESPONDENT-PETITIONER-APPELLANT.
LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF MID-NEW YORK, SYRACUSE (GIGI MEYERS OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.
GORDON J. CUFFY, COUNTY ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JOSEPH MILITI OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT ONONDAGA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES.
TERRI BRIGHT, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, FABIUS, FOR SHYANNA L.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Gina M. Glover, R.), entered February 25, 2011 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, granted petitioners-respondents Angel M. Haynes and Robert Haynes joint legal and physical custody of the subject child.
Now, upon the stipulation and order of Family Court, Onondaga County, entered March 1, 2012 and upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance sworn to by respondent-petitioner on February 22, 2012, and signed by respondent-petitioner’s attorney on March 7, 2012, It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: April 20, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit 14(a)(1)(i)**

 
| [WACHOVIA  SECURITIES] | 8739  Research Drive |
|------------------------|----------------------|
|                   | Charlotte,  NC 28286 |

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

Reference ishereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1,1997 by and among First Union Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. asDepositor, First Union National Bank as Master Servicer (the “MasterServicer”), CRIIMI MAE Services Limited Partnership as Special Servicer, andState Street Bank and Trust Company as Trustee, with respect to CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1997-C1 (the “Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein not otherwisedefined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant toSection 3.13 of this Agreement, Timothy S. Ryan and Clyde M. Alexander, VicePresidents of the Master Servicer, do hereby certify that:

 

1.                       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2001 through December 31, 2001 and of its performance under this Agreementduring such period has been made under our supervision; and

 

2.                       Tothe best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the period January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2001; and

 

3.                       TheMaster Servicer has received no notice regarding qualification, or challengingthe status of any portion of the Trust Fund as a REMIC from the InternalRevenue Service or any other governmental agency or body.

 

IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the 7th day ofMarch, 2002.

 
| /s/   Timothy  S. Ryan |   | /s/   Clyde  M. Alexander |
|---------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
| Timothy S.  Ryan, Vice President      |   | Clyde M.  Alexander, Vice President      |
| First Union  National Bank            |   | First Union  National Bank               |

 

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Neil Tucker, Appellant.

[798 NYS2d 910]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered July 29, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and attempted assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his *388contention that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion under the Criminal Procedure Law in precluding alibi testimony *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10 [1995] ). In any event, contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court properly precluded that testimony, since the defendant failed to demonstrate good cause for his untimely alibi notice *(see*CPL 250.20 [3]; *People v Aviles,*234 AD2d 466, 467 [1996]; *People v Martinez,*222 AD2d 702, 703 [1995]). Likewise, the defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the preclusion of the alibi testimony violated his constitutional rights *(see People v Angelo,*88 NY2d 217, 222 [1996]; *People v Walker,*294 AD2d 218 [2002]; *People v Parson,*268 AD2d 208 [2000]). In any event, the defendant’s argument is without merit *(see People v Walker, supra*at 219).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either not properly before this Court, unpreserved for appellate review, or without merit. Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Ritter and Rivera, JJ., concur.
STATE v. McPHAIL.

No. COA06-1177.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Robeson (04CRS50631, 04CRS51228, 04CRS51229, 04CRS51230, 04CRS51231, 04CRS51232, 04CRS51233, 04CRS51234, 04CRS51235, 04CRS51236, 04CRS51237, 04CRS51238, 04CRS51239, 04CRS51240, 04CRS51241, 04CRS51242, 04CRS51243, 04CRS51244, 04CRS51245, 04CRS51246, 04CRS51247, 04CRS51248).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part; reversed in part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                5
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               164,818
<SECURITIES>                                         11,526,901
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,428,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          5,999,654
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     19,366,841
<PP&E>                                               4,456,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                       1,139,803
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       22,835,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                2,467,219
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             110,112
<OTHER-SE>                                           20,257,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         22,835,000
<SALES>                                              2,843,559
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     2,843,559
<CGS>                                                1,647,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,647,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (872,202)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (6,707,752)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (6,707,752)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (6,707,752)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
MacFADDEN v. LOUF

No. COA06-1088

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from Craven (04CVS741).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David
A. Jackson,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                             /s/ David A. Jackson
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             David A. Jackson
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             August 6, 2004

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Knight  Transportation,  Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Knight
Transportation,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1243/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1243/2013 of 28 November 2013 approving non-minor amendments to the specification            for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Dinde de Bresse            (PDO)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1243/2013                     

# of 28 November 2013

# approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin                        and protected geographical indications [Dinde de Bresse (PDO)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France’s                              application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Dinde de Bresse’,                              registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96(2) and amended on 14 May 2003 by Commission Regulation (EC) No 828/2003(3).

(2)Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission                              published the amendment application in the *Official Journal of the European Union* as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation(4).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments                              to the specification should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The amendments to the specification published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.1.****Fresh meat (and offal)**U.K.

#### FRANCEU.K.

Dinde de Bresse (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 148, 21.6.1996, p. 1.                           

3

OJ L 120, 15.5.2003, p. 3.                           

4

OJ C 157, 6.4.2013, p. 4.