alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 45/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 45/2013 of 17 January 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in EU and Norwegian            waters of IV north of 53° 30′ N by vessels flying the flag of Germany         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 45/2013                     

# of 17 January 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in EU and Norwegian waters of IV north of 53° 30′ N by vessels flying the                        flag of Germany                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 44/2012 of 17 January 2012 fixing for 2012 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non- EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2012.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2012.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2012 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 January 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 25, 27.1.2012, p. 55.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Pedro Rodriguez, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 513]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (DiMango, J.), rendered December 11, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 24(b)

                                SOLUTIA INC.

                                CERTIFICATE

         I, Rosemary L. Klein, Senior Vice President, Secretary and
General Counsel of Solutia Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the
following is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Company on March 9, 2006, at which meeting a
quorum was present and acting throughout:

              FURTHER RESOLVED, that each officer and director who may be
              required to sign and execute the 2005 Annual Report on Form
              10-K or any document in connection therewith (whether for and
              on behalf of the Company, or as an officer or director of the
              Company, or otherwise), be and hereby is authorized to execute
              a power of attorney appointing Rosemary L. Klein and Miriam R.
              Singer, or either of them acting alone, his or her true and
              lawful attorney or attorneys to sign in his or her name, place
              and stead in any such capacity such Annual Report on Form 10-K
              and any and all amendments thereto and documents in connection
              therewith, and to file the same with the Commission or any
              other governmental body, each of said attorneys to have power
              to act with or without the others, and to have full power and
              authority to do and perform, in the name and on behalf of each
              of said officers and directors, every act whatsoever which
              such attorneys, or any one of them, may deem necessary,
              appropriate or desirable to be done in connection therewith as
              fully and to all intents and purposes as such officers or
              directors might or could do in person.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand in my official
capacity and affixed the corporate seal of the Company this 9th day of
March, 2006.

                                              /s/ Rosemary L. Klein
                                              ---------------------
                                              Rosemary L. Klein
                                              Senior Vice President, General
                                              Counsel and Secretary

SEAL
Raymond M. ARD, Employee v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, Self-Insured Employer, and AIG Claims Management, Administrator.

No. 220P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Michael C. Sigmon, Ginny P. Lanier, Cary, for Owens-Illinois, et al.

*255Fred D. Poisson, Jr., Wadesboro, E. Stewart Poisson, Wilmington, for Ard.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 642 S.E.2d 257.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 17th day of May 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              10,582,645
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    26,091,157
<PP&E>                                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      26,091,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  728,059
<BONDS>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        26,091,157
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     5,575,115
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2,963,014
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      2,612,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  2,612,101
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,612,101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            16.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            16.96

        

</TABLE>
PLOTT v. BOJANGLE'S, et al.

No. 55A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 28, 2007.

Jolinda J. Babcock, Winston-Salem, Eleasa H. Allen, for Bojangle's, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of March 2007 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Plott) shall have up to and including the 27th day of May 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in *77conference this the 28th day of March 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
#### NYCTL-1 Trust et al., Respondents, v Liberty Bay Realty Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants. American Pioneer Title Insurance Company, Intervenor-Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 346]

*1014In an action to foreclose a tax lien, the defendant Liberty Bay Realty Corp. appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated August 29, 2003, as denied its motion, inter alia, to vacate its default in appearing or answering the complaint and to set aside the judgment of foreclosure and the foreclosure sale.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court properly denied those branches of the motion of the defendant Liberty Bay Realty Corp. (hereinafter Liberty Bay) which were to vacate its default in appearing or answering the complaint and to set aside the judgment of . foreclosure and the foreclosure sale. Liberty Bay was properly served with the summons and complaint by service on the Secretary of State *(see*CPLR 311 [a] [1]; Business Corporation Law § 306 [b] [1]). Contrary to Liberty Bay’s contention, the plaintiffs were not required to serve an additional copy of the summons and complaint before obtaining a default judgment against it, since this is an action affecting title to real property *(see*CPLR 3215 [g] [4] [iii]; *FGB Realty Advisors v Norm-Rick Realty Corp.,*227 AD2d 439, 440 [1996]). Furthermore, since Liberty Bay defaulted in appearing or answering the complaint, it was not entitled to service of additional papers in the action *(see*CPLR 2103 [e]; *Olympia Mtge. Corp. v Ramirez,*9 AD3d 401 [2004]; *Polish Natl. Alliance of Brooklyn v White Eagle Hall Co.,*98 AD2d 400, 403 [1983]). The plaintiffs nevertheless served the order appointing a referee and the judgment of foreclosure upon Liberty Bay, in accordance with the Supreme Court’s direction. As Liberty Bay failed to substantiate the claim that mail was undeliverable to the address of the subject property *(see Platonov v Sciabarra,*305 AD2d 651 [2003]), mailings to that address were sufficient *(see Matter of 380 Front St. No. 20 Corp. v County of Dutchess,*264 AD2d 739, 739-740 [1999]; *Cornwall Warehousing v Town of New Windsor,*238 AD2d 370, 371 [1997]). Liberty Bay therefore failed to establish a reasonable excuse for its default *(see*CPLR 5015 [a]).

*1015Liberty Bay’s contention that the foreclosure sale was not commercially reasonable is without merit. The price paid for the property at the foreclosure sale was not so low as to shock the conscience of the court *(see Provident Sav. Bank v Bordes,*244 AD2d 470 [1997]; *Long Is. Sav. Bank of Centereach v Jean Valiquette, M.D., P.C.,*183 AD2d 877, 878 [1992]; *Harbert Offset Corp. v Bowery Sav. Bank,*174 AD2d 650, 655 [1991]; *Polish Natl. Alliance of Brooklyn v White Eagle Hall Co., supra*at 406-410). Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Biometrics, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Ronald R. Helm,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and John P. Jensen, Vice President of
Finance and Controller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
of our information and belief:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
September 25, 2009





/s/ Ronald R. HelmRonald
      R. HelmPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/ John P. JensenJohn P. JensenVice
      President of Finance and Controller
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT 32(b)


 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, James M. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of Solutia Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
                  fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully
                  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                  in all material respects, the financial condition and
                  results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 14, 2006

                                         /s/ James M. Sullivan
                                         ---------------------
                                         James M. Sullivan
                                         Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Solutia Inc.
and will be retained by Solutia Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3029

AN ACT

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small Business Act and the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 3029 ES

1 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AU2 THORIZATION OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE 

3 SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND THE SMALL BUSI4 NESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An 

6 Act to extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small 

7 Business Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 

8 (Public Law 109–316; 120 Stat. 1742), as most recently 

9 amended by section 1 of Public Law 110–136 (121 Stat. 

10 1453), is amended by striking ‘‘May 23, 2008’’ each place 

11 it appears and inserting ‘‘March 20, 2009’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 subsection (a) shall take effect on May 22, 2008. 

Passed the Senate May 15, 2008. 

Attest:

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3029

AN ACT

To provide for an additional temporary extension of 

other purposes.Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for programs under the Small Business Act and the
```

                                                                   Exhibit 99.7

               **CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

     In  connection  with the  accompanying  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q of
Selkirk  Cogen  Funding  Corporation  for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, I, P.
Chrisman Iribe,  President of Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation,  hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     (1)  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002
          fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained in such Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
          the  quarter  ended June 30,  2002 fairly  presents,  in all  material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Selkirk
          Cogen Funding Corporation.

August 14, 2002                               /s/ P. Chrisman Iribe
                                              --------------------
                                              P. Chrisman Iribe
                                              President
                                              Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation
```
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3123 

To require lobbyists who represent foreign politicians or political parties 

and foreign entities to register under the Foreign Agents Registration 

Act of 1938. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2008 

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself, Mrs. MCCASKILL, and Mr. OBAMA) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require lobbyists who represent foreign politicians or political parties and foreign entities to register under the 

Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Closing the Foreign 

5 Lobbying Loophole Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT. 

7 Section 3 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 

8 1938 (22 U.S.C. 613) is amended by striking subsection 

9 (h). 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 3123 IS

1 SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF LOBBYING CONTACTS TO OUTSIDE 

2 THE UNITED STATES. 

3 Section 1(c)(1)(iv) of the Foreign Agents Registra4 tion Act of 1938 (22 U.S.C. 611(c)(1)(iv)) is amended by 

5 inserting ‘‘or outside the United States’’ after ‘‘within the 

6 United States’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

CHRISTOS N. KRITIKOS, an individual, and JUPITER HOLDING CO., 

LLC,

Appellants,

v.

ANDERSEN BUILDERS, INC.,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-4000

[ July 6, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; George A. Shahood, Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-735 CA.

Steven L. Brannock of Brannock & Humphries, Tampa, for appellants.

Kansas R. Gooden of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Jacksonville, Thomas A. 

Berger of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Coconut Creek, and John P. Seiler of 

Seiler Sautter Zaden Rimes & Wahlbrink, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 16, 2022

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21

- 58 2

Lower Tribunal No. 12

- 21765 SP

________________



### United Automobile Insurance Company

, etc.,

Appellant,

vs.



### Millennium Radiology, LLC,

d/b/a Millennium Open MRI,

a/a/o Jennifer M. Alvarez

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the C ounty Court for Miami

- Dade County, Linda

Singer Stein, Judge.

Michael J. Neimand , for appellant.

David B. Pakula, P.A. , and David B. Pakula (Pembroke Pines ) ; and

Marks & Fleischer, P.A. , and Gary Marks (Fort Lauderdale) , for appellee.

Before LOGUE, HENDON, and LOBREE , JJ.

PER CURIAM.2 We reverse and remand consistent with our recent decision in United

Automobile Insurance Co. v. Millennium Radiology, LLC , 47 Fla. L. Weekly

D175 (Fla. 3d DCA Jan. 12, 2022) (“Millennium’s ‘identity’ is not the same

in each of these cases against United Auto; Millennium draws its identity

from its assignor from case to case. The identity element of collateral

estoppel, therefore, is not satisfied.”).

Reversed and re manded.
**Exhibit
      32**







**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Carol
      K.
      Nelson, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Lars H. Johnson, Chief
      Financial Officer of Cascade Financial Corporation (the "Corporation"), each
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





|1. | The
              Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarterly period ended June 30,
              2006
              (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a)
              or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
              and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. | The
              information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
              Corporation.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




This
      certification is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is
      not
      being filed as part of this quarterly report.








Date:
      August 4, 2006








/s/
      Carol K. Nelson


Carol
      K.
      Nelson, President and CEO








/s/
      Lars H. Johnson


Lars
      H.
      Johnson, Chief Financial Officer
IN RE C.B.

No. COA06-591.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 17, 2007.

Certification Date August 6, 2007.

Appeal from Buncombe (05J79, 05J80).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.