alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
 <MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             FEB-3-1996          FEB-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  FEB-3-1996          FEB-1-1997
<CASH>                                            41,849              48,769
<SECURITIES>                                           0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     24,683              23,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0                   0
<INVENTORY>                                      520,555             604,910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 632,813             737,783
<PP&E>                                         1,544,691           1,554,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                   530,543             625,104
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,669,753           1,692,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            349,731             504,581
<BONDS>                                          656,260             521,512
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                            0                   0
<COMMON>                                             539                 573
<OTHER-SE>                                       568,856             565,331
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,669,753           1,692,020
<SALES>                                        3,422,718           3,724,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,422,718           3,724,839
<CGS>                                          2,449,204           2,619,312
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    885,087             971,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                39,578              39,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   48,849              94,428
<INCOME-TAX>                                      18,563              35,883
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               30,286              58,545
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0                   0
<CHANGES>                                              0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                      30,286              58,545
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.57                1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.53                1.05
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of
T-NETIX, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, I, Henry G. Schopfer III, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                           
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with
    the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|
| | 2. The information contained in this
    Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
    financial condition and results of operation of T-NETIX, Inc.



| |     |                          
| | --- | -------------------------
| | By: | /s/ HENRY G. SCHOPFER III

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| |                        
| | Henry G. Schopfer III  
| | Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2003
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 588/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 588/2013 of 20 June 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 588/2013                     

# of 20 June 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 June 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

               LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF DESTIA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

       NAME                                 JURISDICTION
       ----                                 ------------

America First Ltd.                         United Kingdom

Destia Communications Services, Inc.        Delaware

Destia Network Services Ltd.                United Kingdom

Econophone AG                               Switzerland

Econophone GmbH                             Austria

ECONOphone GmbH                             Germany

Econophone, Ltd.                            Ireland

Econophone Netherlands B.V.                 Netherlands

Econophone NV                               Belgium

Econophone SA                               France

Econophone Services GmbH                    Switzerland

Telco Global Communications Ltd.            United Kingdom

Voicenet Corporation                        New York

3461386 Canada, Inc.                        Canada
ARMSTRONG v. UC LENDING CORP.

No. 499P06-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 6, 2007.

Patricia Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, for UC Lending Corp.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of May 2007 by Plaintiff for judgment with supporting affidavit and documentation in his favor and against appellees:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of December 2007."
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 19, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 04-51312

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

ROBERTO AGUIRRE-VILLA also known as, Jose Hernandez

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Western District of Texas

(04-CR-687)

---------------------

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the

sentence is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand case to the United States District Court for the Western

District of Texas, El Paso Division, for resentencing is granted.

______________

*Pursuant to 5

th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to

extend time to file appellee’s brief until 14 days from the

Court’s denial of appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is moot.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2011

p0321 

# Order

March 29, 2011

142065

SHERYL A. BEACH, f/k/a SHERYL A. LYMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 142065 COA: 297807 Macomb CC: 2 008-001774-CZ CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CHESTERFIELD, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 30, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 842/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 842/2013 of 30 August 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for mackerel in areas VIIIc,            IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1 by vessels flying the flag of Germany         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 842/2013                     

# of 30 August 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for mackerel in areas VIIIc, IX and X; EU waters of CECAF 34.1.1 by vessels flying the                        flag of Germany                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 August 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony SMITH.

No. 276P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Anthony T. Smith, for Smith.

Charles E. Reece, Assistant Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th day of June 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Beaufort County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
IN RE V.S.H.

No. COA06-924

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from New Hanover (06J6).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 164/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 164/2013 of 21 February 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative            prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 164/2013                     

# of 21 February 2013

# amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1), and in particular Article 143 in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,                        

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 614/2009 of 7 July 2009 on the common system of trade for ovalbumin and lactalbumin(2), and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Commission Regulation (EC) No 1484/95(3) lays down detailed rules for implementing the system of additional import duties and fixes representative prices in the poultrymeat                              and egg sectors and for egg albumin.

(2)Regular monitoring of the data used to determine representative prices for poultrymeat and egg products and for egg albumin                              shows that the representative import prices for certain products should be amended to take account of variations in price                              according to origin.

(3)Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 should be amended accordingly.

(4)Given the need to ensure that this measure applies as soon as possible after the updated data have been made available, this                              Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication.

(5)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common                              Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 February 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### “‘ANNEX I

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 181, 14.7.2009, p. 8.                           

3

OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p. 47.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0000930090
<NAME>               INTELLIGENT MEDICAL IMAGING, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                       U.S.$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                         482,604
<SECURITIES>                                 2,549,413
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,438,698
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,330,034
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,860,902
<PP&E>                                       4,967,549
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,868,393)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,798,356
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,622,909
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       110,316
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,808,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,798,356
<SALES>                                      1,042,298
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,042,298
<CGS>                                          761,292
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  761,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,417,586)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,417,586)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,417,586)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        


</TABLE>
Michael L. CLEMMONS, Employee v. SECURITAS, Inc., Employer and American Home Assurance Company (ESIS), Carrier.

No. 324P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Paul C. Lawrence, Dalton G. Blair, Charlotte, for Securitas, Inc., et al.

*259Travis Payne, for Clemmons.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 10th day of July 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of July 2007 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
STATE v. Eddie CAPLE.

No. 437A05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 22, 2007.

Paul F. Herzog, Fayetteville, for Caple.

L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of October 2007 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 21st day of November 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of October 2007."

HUDSON, J., recused.
# C_2018215EN.01000101.xml

| 19.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2016-2017 SESSION

Sittings of 3 to 6 October 2016

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 314, 21.9.2017
  .

The Minutes of this session have been published in

OJ C 314, 21.9.2017

TEXTS ADOPTED

Sittings of 24 to 27 October 2016

The Minutes of this session have been published in

  OJ C 326, 28.9.2017
  .

The Minutes of this session have been published in

OJ C 326, 28.9.2017

The texts adopted of 27 October 2016 concerning the discharge for the financial year 2014 have been published in

  OJ L 333, 8.12.2016
  .

The texts adopted of 27 October 2016 concerning the discharge for the financial year 2014 have been published in

OJ L 333, 8.12.2016

TEXTS ADOPTED

---