alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
                       THE CIT GROUP/SALES FINANCING, INC.
                       ----------------------------------  
                          ANNUAL OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE
                          ----------------------------    


      The  undersigned  certifies  that  he  is a  Vice  President  of  The  CIT
Group/Sales Financing,  Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware
("CITSF"),  and that as such he is duly  authorized  to execute and deliver this
certificate  on  behalf  of CITSF  in  connection  with  the Sale and  Servicing
Agreement,  dated as of August 1, 1996 (the  "Agreement"),  among CITSF, The CIT
Group  Securitization  Corporation  II and Mellon  Bank,  as Owner  Trustee (all
capitalized terms used herein without definition having the respective  meanings
specified  in  the  Agreement),  and  further  certifies  that a  review  of the
activities  of CITSF and of its  performance  of its  obligations  has been made
under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge,  CITSF has fulfilled its
obligations under the Agreement.


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature this day of March 
26, 1997.




                                          /s/ Frank Garcia
                                          ------------------
                                          Name:  Frank Garcia
                                          Title: Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           493
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           454
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         2,175
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           2,160
<LOANS>                                      134,641
<ALLOWANCE>                                      101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               141,879
<DEPOSITS>                                    83,136
<SHORT-TERM>                                       0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,569
<LONG-TERM>                                   38,425
<COMMON>                                          17
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                    18,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               141,879
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                7,255
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 79
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 134
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               7,468
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,872
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,408
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,060
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      1
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,802
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,189
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,189
<EPS-BASIC>                                   0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.82
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  2.95
<LOANS-NON>                                        0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     712
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 100
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      0
<RECOVERIES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                101
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          101


</TABLE>
# Diocese in Europe Measure 2013

        - Previous
        - Next

E

# Diocese in Europe Measure 2013

# 2013 No. 1

A Measure passed by the General Synod of the Church of England to make further provision for the Diocese in Europe.

[26th March 2013]

Prospective

## 1Power for Church Commissioners and Archbishops' Council to make financial provision for Diocese in EuropeE

(1)The Church Commissioners (“the Commissioners”) may, from time to time, pay, out of their general fund, such sums as they think fit for the purpose of the development                           of the mission of the Diocese in Europe (“the Diocese”).                     

(2)Sections 2(3) and 8 of the National Institutions Measure 1998 (No. 1) shall have effect as if the purpose mentioned in subsection (1) of this section were a purpose for which the balance in                           the Commissioners' general fund was available immediately before the coming into force of those sections.                     

## 2Amendment of Article 8 of Constitution of the General SynodE

(1)The Diocese is a diocese for the purposes of Article 8(1) of the Constitution of the General Synod set out in Schedule 2 to                        the Synodical Government Measure 1969 (No. 2).                  

(2)The following provisions are repealed—                  

(a)the words “or, in the case of the Diocese in Europe, of the bishop's council and standing committee of that diocese” in Article                        8(1) of the Constitution; and                  

(b)section 3 of the Diocese in Europe Measure 1980 (No. 2).                  

Commencement Information

I1S. 2 in force at 1.7.2013 by S.I. 2013/3, **art. 2**

Prospective

## 3Short title and commencementE

(1)This Measure may be cited as the Diocese in Europe Measure 2013.                     

(2)This Measure shall come into force on such day as the Archbishops of Canterbury and York may jointly appoint and different                           days may be appointed for different provisions or for different purposes.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1338/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1338/2013 of 13 December 2013 amending for the 208th time Council Regulation (EC)            No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the            Al Qaida network         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1338/2013                     

# of 13 December 2013

# amending for the 208th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against                        certain persons and entities associated with the Al Qaida network                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 of 27 May 2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed                           against certain persons and entities associated with the Al-Qaida network(1), and in particular Article 7(1)(a) and 7a(5) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 lists the persons, groups and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic                              resources under that Regulation.

(2)On 4 December 2013, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) decided to remove one person from                              its list of persons, groups and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

(3)Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 should therefore be updated accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

*the Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 is amended as follows:

The following entry under the heading ‘Natural persons’ is deleted:

‘Youcef **Abbes** (*alias* Giuseppe). Date of birth: 5.1.1965. Place of birth: Bab el Oued, Algiers, Algeria. Nationality: Algerian. Other information:                        (a) Father’s name is Mokhtar; (b) Mother’s name is Abbou Aicha. Date of designation referred to in Article 2a (4) (b): 17.3.2004.’                  

1

OJ L 139, 29.5.2002, p. 9.
EX-10.1


 Exhibit 10.1 

June 30, 2016 
 Hartman Ashford Crossing, LLC 

c/o Kennedy Wilson Austin, Inc., its agent 
 1880 S. Dairy
Ashford, Suite 570 
 Houston, Texas 77077 
  

	Re:	Notice of Early Termination of Lease Agreement for all space occupied by RigNet, Inc. in the building known as Ashford Crossing II located at 1880 S. Dairy Ashford, Houston, Texas 


Dear Sirs: 
 This Notice of Early Termination is being provided
to Hartman Ashford Crossing, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, as Landlord and successor in interest to KWI Ashford Westchase Building, LP under that certain lease agreement (the “Lease”) dated June 17, 2003, as amended
in eleven (11) separate amendments, and in particular, in accordance with Section 7 of the Tenth Amendment dated December 31, 2014 and Section 6 of the Eleventh Amendment dated February 28, 2015. RigNet, Inc., as Tenant
under the Lease provides this notice of the exercise of its option to terminate the Lease effective February 28, 2017. 
 Payment of the required
amount to exercise the early termination option is provided as set forth below (one month’s rent plus the unamortized portion of the leasehold improvements and real estate commissions paid by the Landlord from the proposed date of early
termination through the original end of the lease term). The amortization term runs from July 1, 2015 through February 28, 2017 (a total of 20 months of the 38 month lease term expiring August 31, 2018). We have calculated that amount
as being $69,120.00 (one month’s rent) plus $72,582.18 (unamortized portion of broker’s commissions paid by Landlord) for a total of $141,702.18, as there are currently no unamortized leasehold improvement costs for any of the
space. Although we have just recently submitted our request for payment of the Landlord’s portion of the leasehold improvements, RigNet’s invoice for such improvements has not yet been paid. 

Please confirm your receipt of this notice and concurrence with the calculation of the early termination option payment amount as soon as possible after
receipt of this notice. 

  
 [1] 







 Sincerely, 

/s/ Chip Schneider 
 Chip Schneider 

Chief Financial Officer 
  

	Cc:	Steven Pickett, CEO 


	    	William D. Sutton, General Counsel 


  
 [2]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7662
BILLY R. BRASWELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versusWILFORD SHIELDS, Superintendent, Hoke Correctional Institution, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-94-607-5-BR) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 4, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Billy R. Braswell, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Braswell v. Shields , No. CA-94-607-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 336/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 336/2013 of 12 April 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1010/2009 as regards administrative            arrangements with third countries on catch certificates for marine fisheries products         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 336/2013                     

# of 12 April 2013

# amending Regulation (EC) No 1010/2009 as regards administrative arrangements with third countries on catch certificates for                        marine fisheries products                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1005/2008 of 29 September 2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter                           and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing(1), and in particular Articles 12(4), 14(3) and 20(4) and Article 52 thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Administrative arrangements with third countries on catch certificates for fisheries products are listed in Annex IX to Commission                              Regulation (EC) No 1010/2009 of 22 October 2009 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC)                              No 1005/2008 establishing a Community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing(2). Those arrangements include specimens of the catch certificates validated by the competent authorities of the third countries                              concerned.

(2)The name of the New Zealand authority appearing on catch certificates validated by that country will change as of 1 March                              2013.

(3)Annex IX to Regulation (EC) No 1010/2009 should be amended accordingly.

(4)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex IX to Regulation (EC) No 1010/2009 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation

## Article 2U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

It shall apply from 1 March 2013.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 April 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

## ANNEXU.K.

In Section 3 (New Zealand) of Annex IX to Regulation (EC) No 1010/2009, Appendix 1 is replaced by the following:

“

”

1

OJ L 286, 29.10.2008, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 280, 27.10.2009, p. 5.
McDANIEL v. CONTINENTAL TIRE.

No. COA06-448.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #398514).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed and remanded.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 19, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-0885 Lower Tribunal No. F11-24568A

________________ 

### William Knight, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge. William Knight, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 By:

/s/  Brian AinsworthBrian AinsworthChief Executive OfficerMarch 31, 2006By:

/s/  Robert AllenRobert AllenChief Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2006
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00204-CV

BNSF Railway Company

v.

Stacy Wipff

§

§

§

§

From the 96th District Court

of Tarrant County (96-249024-10)

August 8, 2013

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the 

trial court is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for a new trial.

It is further ordered that appellee Stacy Wipff shall pay all costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Justice Lee Gabriel
# The Crime Prevention (Designated Areas) (Revocations) Order 2013

        - Previous
        - Next

E+W

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 1760

Highways, England

# The Crime Prevention (Designated Areas) (Revocations) Order 2013

Made

14th July 2013

Laid before Parliament

17th July 2013

Coming into force

1st October 2013

The Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 118B(1)(a) of the Highways Act 1980(1), makes the following Order:                        

## Citation and commencementE+W

1.  This Order may be cited as the Crime Prevention (Designated Areas) (Revocations) Order 2013 and comes into force on 1st October                     2013.                  

## RevocationsE+W

2.  The Orders listed in the table in the Schedule are revoked.                  

Richard Benyon

Parliamentary Under Secretary of State

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

14th July 2013

Article 2

## SCHEDULEE+WRevocations

### Table of revocations

## EXPLANATORY NOTE

(This note is not part of the Order)

This instrument revokes six Orders which designated areas for the purposes of section 118B of the Highways Act 1980 (c. 66). Sections 118B and 119B of that Act enable a council which is a highway authority, for the purposes of preventing or reducing                     certain crime or for protecting school pupils or staff in relation to certain activities, to make orders stopping up or diverting                     the line of certain highways within such designated areas.                  

An impact assessment has not been produced as no impact, or no significant impact, on the private, voluntary or public sectors                     is foreseen.                  

1

1980 c. 66; section 118B was inserted by the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 (c. 37), Schedule 6, paragraph 8. There is an amendment to that section, but it is not relevant to this instrument.
**Exhibit 8.1**
**List of Significant Subsidiaries**
Below is a list of all of Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd.’s “significantsubsidiaries”, as defined in rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X, as of the end ofthe year covered by this report.
1. Ainsworth Engineered Corp., wholly owned. Incorporated under thelaws of Nova Scotia, Canada. 2. Ainsworth Engineered (USA), LLC, wholly owned. Incorporated under thelaws of Delaware, U.S.A. 3. Ainsworth Engineered Canada Limited Partnership, whollyowned. Formed under thelaws of British Columbia.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report of Chinawe.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Man Keung Wai, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/    Man Keung Wai                  
|                                      
|Chief Financial Officer
March 29, 2012

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Chinawe.com Inc. and will be retained by Chinawe.com Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
March 14, 2022
No. 04

- 22

- 00110

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF M.V., A CHILD

From the 408th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021PA00756 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R
The reporter ’s record was originally due to be filed on March 4, 2022. To date, the court reporter responsible for preparing the record has neither filed the record n or a notification of late record

. This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights

. Consequently, each extension of the de adline to file the reporter’s record must not exceed 10 days , see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(c); cumulative extensions must not exceed 30 days, absent extraordinary circumstances , see id. R. 28.4(b)(2); and this appeal must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed , s ee T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. G iven the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal , w e ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s record in th is court no later than March 14 , 2022

. R equests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of March, 2022

.

__________________________________ _ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court