alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997, AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR
THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         65
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  531
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,082
<PP&E>                                         3,735
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,636
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 56,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,178
<BONDS>                                        65,000
<COMMON>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (14,974)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   56,575
<SALES>                                        15,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,273
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15,616
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,590)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,590)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                3,241
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,831)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 3.5

                  CERTIFICATE OF CHANGE IN NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED
                AND ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING SHARES OF COMMON STOCK
                       OF ELINE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.

         Pursuant to Section 78.207 of the Nevada Revised Statutes of the State
of Nevada, the undersigned, being the President of ELINE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP,
INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Nevada
(the "Corporation"), bearing file number C-12526-1997, does hereby certify that
the following resolutions were adopted pursuant to the authority of the Board of
Directors:

         WHEREAS, the Corporation currently is authorized to issued up to
5,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 and 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, par value $0.001.

         WHEREAS, the Corporation currently has issued and outstanding
70,137,954 shares of common stock.

         RESOLVED, that the Corporation shall reverse split its common stock on
a ratio of 250 for one by decreasing the number its authorized shares of common
stock from 5,000,000,000 shares to 20,000,000 shares, and correspondingly
decreasing the number of its issued and outstanding shares of its common stock
held by each stockholder of record on November 28, 2002 from 70,137,954 shares
to approximately 282,552 shares of common stock, subject to rounding as
hereinafter set forth; and be it

         FURTHER RESOLVED, that on the effective date of the actions herein
adopted, the Corporation's authorized common stock shall consist of 20,000,000
shares, par value $.001 per share and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $0.001 per share; and be it

         FURTHER RESOLVED, that the effective date of the actions herein adopted
shall be November 29, 2002; and be it

         FURTHER RESOLVED, that no cash will be paid or distributed as a result
of the aforedescribed reverse stock split of the Corporation's common stock, and
no fractional shares will be issued. All fractional shares which would otherwise
be required to be issued as a result of the stock split will be rounded up to
the nearest whole share; and be it

         FURTHER RESOLVED, that as these actions have been approved by the
Corporation's Board of Directors in conformity with the provisions of Section
78.207 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, and no stockholder approval is required
in connection therewith.

                                        1
<PAGE>

         The foregoing resolutions and this Certificate were adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Corporation pursuant to a written consent of the sole
director of the Corporation dated November 18, 2002.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, being the President of this
Corporation, has executed this Certificate as of November 18, 2002.

                                        ELINE ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.

                                        By:/s/ Barry A. Rothman
                                           ---------------------------
                                           Barry A. Rothman, President

                                        2
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, John
C. Corey, President and Chief Executive Officer, of Stoneridge, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008
(“the Report”) which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      JOHN C. COREYJohn C. Corey, President and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
      11, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1347/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1347/2013 of 13 December 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for mackerel in areas IIIa            and IVbc by vessels flying the flag of the United Kingdom         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1347/2013                     

# of 13 December 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for mackerel in areas IIIa and IVbc by vessels flying the flag of the United Kingdom

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
STATE v. PARKER.

No. COA06-426.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 20, 2007.

Certification Date March 12, 2007.

Appeal from Davidson (04CRS61146).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Chant Engineering Co., Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63366

)

Under Contract No. SPMYM2-21-C-0003 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Marc Lamer, Esq.

 Kostos and Lamer, P.C.

 Philadelphia, PA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

 DLA Chief Trial Attorney

John J. Pritchard, Esq.

Tyson McDonald, Esq.

 Trial Attorneys

 DLA Land and Maritime

 Columbus, OH

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Appellant’s unopposed motion to withdraw the appeal without prejudice, filed 

prior to the government filing an answer, is granted.

Dated: October 5, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63366, Appeal of Chant Engineering 

Co., Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: October 5, 2022

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
TILLEY v. DIAMOND.

No. COA06-500.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 17, 2007.

Certification Date August 6, 2007.

Appeal from Watauga (02CVD14).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and Reversed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary finanical information extracted from Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-Q
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         3581572
<SECURITIES>                                     43151
<RECEIVABLES>                                 13552298
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              29166786
<PP&E>                                         2568042
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                33030351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         22702622
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         90000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (5598107)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  33030351
<SALES>                                       39661785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              39661785
<CGS>                                         37368709
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 37368709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1835260)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1835260)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
DUNN, et al. v. STATE of NC, et al.

No. 605PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 16, 2007.

John R. Wylie, David J. Guin, Birmingham, AL, Tammy Stokes, Stephen Dampier, Norman Smith, Jack E. Thornton, Winston-Salem, Arthur T. Susman, for Dunn, et al.

*97The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of May 2007 by Defendants for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendants (State of NC, et al.) shall have up to and including the 5th day of July 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of May 2007."
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3106 

To amend chapter 13 of title 17, United States Code (relating to the vessel 

hull design protection), to clarify the definitions of a hull and a deck. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2008 

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. KOHL, and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 13 of title 17, United States Code (relating to the vessel hull design protection), to clarify the 

definitions of a hull and a deck. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VESSEL HULL DESIGN PROTECTION. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This section may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Vessel Hull Design Protection Amendments of 2008’’. 

6 (b) DESIGNS PROTECTED.—Section 1301(a) of title 

7 17, United States Code, is amended by striking paragraph 

8 (2) and inserting the following: 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3106 IS

1 ‘‘(2) VESSEL FEATURES.—The design of a ves2 sel hull, deck, or combination of a hull and deck, in3 cluding a plug or mold, is subject to protection 

4 under this chapter, notwithstanding section 

5 1302(4).’’. 

6 (c) EXCEPTIONS.—Section 1301(a) of title 17, 

7 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(3) EXCEPTIONS.—Department of Defense 

10 rights in a registered design under this chapter, in11 cluding the right to build to such registered design, 

12 shall be determined solely by operation of section 

13 2320 of title 10, the United States Code, or by the 

14 instrument under which the design was developed 

15 for the United States Government.’’. 

16 (d) DEFINITIONS.—Section 1301(b) of title 17, 

17 United States Code, is amended— 

18 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘vessel hull, 

19 including a plug or mold,’’ and inserting ‘‘vessel hull 

20 or deck, including a plug or mold,’’; 

21 (2) by striking paragraph (4) and inserting the 

22 following: 

23 ‘‘(4) A ‘hull’ is the exterior frame or body of a 

24 vessel, exclusive of the deck, superstructure, masts, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•S 3106 IS

1 sails, yards, rigging, hardware, fixtures, and other 

2 attachments.’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(7) A ‘deck’ is the horizontal surface of a ves5 sel that covers the hull, including exterior cabin and 

6 cockpit surfaces, and exclusive of masts, sails, yards, 

7 rigging, hardware, fixtures, and other attachments.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5475 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make a technical correction 

to ensure sex offenders who travel between States, regardless of when 

they traveled, must register with appropriate state and local authorities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 19, 2008 

Mr. MOORE of Kansas (for himself, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mrs. BOYDA of Kansas, 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. CASTLE, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. 

CHANDLER, Mr. CLEAVER, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. DAVIS of 

Alabama, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. MARIO DIAZBALART of Florida, Mr. EDWARDS, Mr. GORDON of Tennessee, Ms. 

GRANGER, Ms. HERSETH SANDLIN, Mr. HILL, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. JONES

of North Carolina, Mr. KIND, Mr. KIRK, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. LAMPSON, 

Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota, Mr. POE, 

Ms. PRYCE of Ohio, Mr. RAMSTAD, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Ms. LORETTA

SANCHEZ of California, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mrs. WILSON of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to make a technical 

correction to ensure sex offenders who travel between 

States, regardless of when they traveled, must register 

with appropriate state and local authorities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5475 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sex Offender Manda3 tory Registration Act of 2008’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION. 

5 (a) TIMING OF TRAVEL AND RELATED ELEMENTS.— 

6 Section 2250(a)(2)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘or has traveled’’ after ‘‘trav9 els’’; 

10 (2) by inserting ‘‘or has entered or left, or re11 sided in,’’ before ‘‘Indian country’’; and 

12 (3) by inserting ‘‘, after conviction of the of13 fense by reason of which the person is a sex offender 

14 as defined for the purposes of the Sex Offender Reg15 istration and Notification Act’’ after ‘‘Indian coun16 try’’. 

17 (b) CONTINUING NATURE OF OFFENSE.—Section 

18 2250 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by add19 ing at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(d) CONTINUING OFFENSE.—An offense under sub21 section (a) is a continuing offense so long as the failure 

22 described in subsection (a)(3) continues.’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
[Cite as State v. Lewis, 2021-Ohio-477.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

LAKE COUNTY, OHIO 

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : 

 CASE NO. 2021-L-012

 - vs - : 

KENNY LEWIS a.k.a. KENY LEWIS 

a.k.a. KENYATTA LEWIS, 

: 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

: 

Criminal Appeal from the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2010 CR 

000649. 

Judgment: Appeal dismissed. 

Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecutor, Lake County Administration Building, 

105 Main Street, P.O. Box 490, Painesville, OH 44077 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). 

Kenny Lewis, pro se, PID# A594-271, Marion Correctional Institution, 940 MarionWilliamsport Road, P.O. Box 57, Marion, OH 43302 (Defendant-Appellant). 

MARY JANE TRAPP, P.J. 

{¶1} On January 25, 2021, appellant, Kenny Lewis, pro se, filed a notice of 

appeal from the trial court’s December 11, 2020 entry, which denied his motion for leave 

to file a motion to correct a void sentence. A timely notice of appeal was due no later 

than January 11, 2021, which was not a holiday or weekend. The appeal is untimely by 

fourteen days. 
2

{¶2} “* * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its 

entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” 

App.R. 4(A)(1). 

{¶3} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for 

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with 

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases: 

{¶4} “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * * 

{¶5} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals 

and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of 

right. * * *.” App.R. 5(A). 

{¶6} Appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R. 

4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Thus, this court is without 

jurisdiction to consider his appeal. Appellant has a remedy of filing an untimely criminal 

appeal under App.R. 5(A). 

{¶7} Appeal dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely. 

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J., 

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J., 

concur.
STATE v. HILL.

COA06-1051.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 15, 2007.

Certification Date June 4, 2007.

Appeal from Pitt (03CRS64190).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7008
AALON SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus VIRGINIA MEDICAL DEPARTMENT FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; PAGE TRUE, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:05-cv-00138-GBL) Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: October 3, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aalon Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Aalon Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Va. Med. Dep’t for the Dep’t of Corrs. , No. 1:05-cv-00138-GBL (E.D. Va. filed May 3, 2006 & entered May 4, 2006). We deny Smith’s motion to be relocated to another facility. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED