alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2014102EN.01002201.xml

| 5.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/22

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2013/480/EU of 20 September 2013 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Decision 2008/915/EC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 266 of 8 October 2013
  )

On page 16, Annex I to the Decision, in the table showing the results for common intercalibration type R-M5 (Mediterranean Rivers Geographical Intercalibration Group Results; Biological Quality Element: Macrophytes and Phytobenthos; Sub-Biological Quality Element: Phytobenthos), the row concerning Portugal should be changed as follows:

for:

| ‘Portugal | IPS (Coste in Cemagref, 1982) | 0,940 | 0,700’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘Portugal

IPS (Coste in Cemagref, 1982)

0,940

0,700’

read:

| ‘Portugal | IPS (Coste in Cemagref, 1982) | 0,940 (type 5)
  0,800 (type 6) | 0,700 (type 5)
  0,651 (type 6)’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘Portugal

IPS (Coste in Cemagref, 1982)

0,940 (type 5)

0,800 (type 6)

0,700 (type 5)

0,651 (type 6)’

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3235 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3235

To reduce the amount of financial assistance provided to the Government 
of Mexico in response to the illegal border crossings from Mexico into 
 the United States, which serve to dissipate the political discontent 
            with the higher unemployment rate within Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 9, 2008

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce the amount of financial assistance provided to the Government 
of Mexico in response to the illegal border crossings from Mexico into 
 the United States, which serve to dissipate the political discontent 
            with the higher unemployment rate within Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BORDER CROSSING ACCOUNTABILITY.

    (a) Estimation of Annual Illegal Border Crossings.--Not later than 
30 days after the end of each fiscal year, the Secretary of State, in 
consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall estimate 
the number of illegal border crossings that occurred during such fiscal 
year along the southern land border of the United States.
    (b) Reduction of Foreign Assistance.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided under paragraph (2), 
        the Secretary of State, shall proportionately reduce the amount 
        of financial assistance provided to the Government of Mexico 
        for each fiscal year by a total of $1,000 for each illegal 
        border crossing from Mexico to the United States during the 
        previous fiscal year.
            (2) Exception.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the 
        Secretary of State may decide not to reduce the amounts 
        appropriated for the Government of Mexico from the 
        International Military Education and Training Fund, the 
        International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement Fund, and 
        the fund to carry out nonproliferation, anti-terrorism, 
        demining, and related programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3309 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

2523 7th Avenue East in North Saint Paul, Minnesota, as the Mayor 

William ‘‘Bill’’ Sandberg Post Office Building. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2008 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself and Mr. COLEMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2523 7th Avenue East in North Saint Paul, 

Minnesota, as the Mayor William ‘‘Bill’’ Sandberg Post 

Office Building. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAYOR WILLIAM ‘‘BILL’’ SANDBERG POST OF4 FICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 2523 7th Avenue East in North 

7 Saint Paul, Minnesota, shall be known and designated as 

8 the ‘‘Mayor William ‘Bill’ Sandberg Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3309 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Mayor William ‘Bill’ 

5 Sandberg Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
IN RE S.T.O.

No. COA06-1145

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Wake (06J63).

Case reported without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
FOSTER et al. v. CRANDELL et al.

No. 73P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 9, 2007.

William J. McMahon, IV, Greensboro, for Crandell & PSIMED.

Angela N. Gray, Greensboro, for Foster, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of February 2007 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of February 2007."
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

November 7, 2008 Revision

Cause number: 01-14-00546-CV

Style: Jerry Valdez v. Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company and 

Robert Stratton

Date motion filed*: September 2, 2014

Type of motion: Motion for Extension of Time to File the Clerk’s Record

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: Clerk’s Record

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: July 9, 2014

Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due date: September 15, 2014

Date Requested: September 23, 2014

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted in part

 Denied

 Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)

 Other: _____________________________________ 

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a), the trial clerk is

responsible for timely filing the clerk’s record. On July 16, 2014, the Clerk of 

this Court granted the trial clerk’s extension request to file the clerk’s record by 

August 8, 2014. On August 15, 2014, the Clerk of this Court notified the trial 

clerk to file the record by September 15, 2014, or to request an extension. On

September 16, 2014, the trial clerk filed a notification that appellant had not paid 

for the record. Accordingly, because the trial clerk has notified this Court that

appellant has yet to pay for the record, appellant’s motion is dismissed as moot.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

  Acting individually 

Date: September 18, 2014
STATE of North Carolina v. Haseen Herman EVERETTE.

No. 452A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2006.

Daniel S. Johnson, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

Richard E. Jester, for Everette.

Prior report: 172 N.C.App. 237, 616 S.E.2d 237.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 19th day of August 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of December 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of August 2005 by Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of December 2006."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 327 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 

study of sites associated with the life of Ce ́sar Estrada Cha ́vez and 

the farm labor movement. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2007 

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study of sites associated with the life 

of Ce ́sar Estrada Cha ́vez and the farm labor movement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ce ́sar Estrada Cha ́vez 

5 Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESOURCE STUDY. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the 

8 date on which funds are made available to carry out this 

9 Act, the Secretary of the Interior (referred to in this Act 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 327 IS

1 as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall complete a resource study of 

2 sites in the State of Arizona, the State of California, and 

3 other States that are significant to the life of Ce ́sar E. 

4 Cha ́vez and the farm labor movement in the western 

5 United States to determine— 

6 (1) appropriate methods for preserving and in7 terpreting the sites; and 

8 (2) whether any of the sites meets the criteria 

9 for listing on the National Register of Historic 

10 Places or designation as a national historic land11 mark under— 

12 (A) the Act of August 21, 1935 (16 U.S.C. 

13 461 et seq.); or 

14 (B) the National Historic Preservation Act 

15 (16 U.S.C. 470 et seq.). 

16 (b) REQUIREMENTS.—In conducting the study under 

17 subsection (a), the Secretary shall— 

18 (1) consider the criteria for the study of areas 

19 for potential inclusion in the National Park System 

20 under section 8(b)(2) of Public Law 91–383 (16 

21 U.S.C. 1a–5(b)(2)); and 

22 (2) consult with— 

23 (A) the Ce ́sar E. Cha ́vez Foundation; 

24 (B) the United Farm Workers Union; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 327 IS

1 (C) State and local historical associations 

2 and societies, including any State historic pres3 ervation offices in the State in which the site is 

4 located. 

5 (c) REPORT.—On completion of the study, the Sec6 retary shall submit to the Committee on Resources of the 

7 House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy 

8 and Natural Resources of the Senate a report that de9 scribes— 

10 (1) the findings of the study; and 

11 (2) any recommendations of the Secretary. 

12 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

13 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

14 as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32.1





Certification


Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Dan R. Lee,
      Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Microtek Medical Holdings,
      Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to the best of
      my knowledge, that:





This
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the “Form
      10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in this
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.








August
                8, 2006
            /s/
                Dan R. LeeDan
                R. LeeChairman,
                President and Chief Executive
                Officer
EVANS v. LAND.

No. 278P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th day of June 2007 by Plaintiff for "Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Prohibitive Order":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC
FORM 10-Q DATED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929649
<NAME>                        DIAMOND CABLE COMMUNICATIONS Plc
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     L
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.6695
<CASH>                                         221,120
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  13,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,822
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         488,150
<DEPRECIATION>                                 71,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 757,305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        758,291
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,478
<OTHER-SE>                                    (59,147)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   757,305
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               41,186
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  51,686
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               1,034
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             40,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,457)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,457)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,457)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 688/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 688/2013 of 18 July 2013 on the allocation of import rights for applications lodged            for the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 for frozen meat of            bovine animals         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 688/2013                     

# of 18 July 2013

# on the allocation of import rights for applications lodged for the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 under the tariff quota                        opened by Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 for frozen meat of bovine animals                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration                           of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences(2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Commission Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 of 19 May 2008 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota                              for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 0206 29 91(3) opens an import tariff quota for beef and veal products.

(2)The applications for import rights lodged for the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 relate to quantities exceeding those                              available. The extent to which import rights may be allocated should therefore be determined and an allocation coefficient                              laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The quantities for which import right applications covered by the quota with the serial number 09.4003 have been lodged for                     the period 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 under Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient                     of 29,736422 %.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 July 2013.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 July 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.                           

3

OJ L 130, 20.5.2008, p. 3.
JONG SUNG PARK v. YOUNG HOMES, INC.

No. COA07-67.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (03CVS15252).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           11406
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             114
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      72522
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            1446
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              1421
<LOANS>                                         500346
<ALLOWANCE>                                       4464
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  601733
<DEPOSITS>                                      359640
<SHORT-TERM>                                     96171
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               7958
<LONG-TERM>                                     102761
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                       35148
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  601733
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   9828
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1154
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    34
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 11016
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                4210
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6339
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             4677
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   3476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1477
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1477
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       976
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.86
<LOANS-NON>                                        795
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1889
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  4254
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 4464
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              4464
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           4464


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 29, 2022

No. 04-22-00126-CR

Albino CEDILLO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-0019-CR

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief is currently due by August 4, 2022. On July 26, 2022, appellant filed a 

motion requesting a thirty-day extension of time. After consideration, we grant the motion and 

order appellant to file the brief by September 6, 2022. Counsel is advised further extensions of 

time will be disfavored absent extraordinary circumstances. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of July, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 15.1

 

ClubCorp, Inc. 

Dallas, Texas 

 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

 

Re: Registration Statements Nos. 33-89818, 33-96568, 333-08041 333-57107, and 333-52612 

 

With respect to the subject registration statements, we acknowledge our awareness of the use therein of our report dated May 7, 2003, related to our review of interim financial information.

 

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933 (theAct), such report is not considered part of a registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Act. 

 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

May 9, 2003