alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
HERMAN MILLER, INC.
2011 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE HERMAN MILLER, INC. 2011 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN as adopted by the
Board of Directors of Herman Miller, Inc. (the "Company") the 13th day of July, 2015, with reference to the following:


RECITALS


A.The Herman Miller, Inc. 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan") was approved by the Company's shareholders on October 10, 2011.


B.Under Article 12 of the Plan, the Board of Directors has the authority, subject to certain conditions, to amend the Plan from time to time.


C.Subject to shareholder approval, the Board has elected to amend the Plan to establish annual limits on the number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to Awards granted to individual Participants.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:


		
	1.
	Article 4 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding new Section 4.3 to read as follows:




4.3 Award Limits. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary, and to the extent an Award is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Code,


(a)the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to any Full Value Award granted under the Plan to any one Participant during any fiscal year of the Company may not exceed 250,000 shares (as adjusted from time to time in accordance with the provisions of the Plan);


(b)the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to any Award granted under the Plan that is not a Full Value Award to any one Participant during any fiscal year of the Company may not exceed 500,000 shares (as adjusted from time to time in accordance with the provisions of the Plan); and
(c)the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be subject to any Award granted under the Plan to any individual Non-employee Director during any fiscal year of the Company may not exceed 40,000 shares (as adjusted from time to time in accordance with the provisions of the Plan).


		
	2.
	In all other respects the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.




CERTIFICATION


The foregoing Second Amendment to the Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors on July 13, 2015.


HERMAN MILLER, INC.




By H. Timothy Lopez


Its Secretary
November 8, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LETICIA B. LOYA, Appellant

NO. 14-10-00864-CV V.

MIGUEL ANGEL LOYA, Appellee

____________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Miguel Angel Loya, 

signed September 3, 2010, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected 

the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the judgment of the court 

below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for proceedings in accordance with the 

court's opinion.

We order appellee, Miguel Angel Loya, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance. We further order this 

decision certified below for observance.
STATE v. ROBERTS.

COA06-877.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 15, 2007.

Certification Date June 4, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (05CRS29401, 05CRS29402).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. DANIELS

No. COA06-282

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Durham (01CRS6233, 01CRS6234).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error in part, dismissed without prejudice in part.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15067]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting; Withdrawal

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

ACTION: Sunshine Act Notice; Notice of Public Roundtable Agenda, 
Withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action withdraws the Sunshine Act Notice published in the 
Federal Register on July 11, 2022, U.S. Election Assistance Commission 
Roundtable Discussion: Disability and the Digital Divide in The Voting 
Process.

DATES: As of July 8, 2022, the Sunshine Act Notice published in the 
Federal Register on July 11, 2022 (87 FR 41117) is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristen Muthig, Telephone: (202) 897-
9285, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#62090f17160a0b05220703014c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c1aaacb4b5a9a8a681a4a0a2efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a>.

Amanda Joiner,
Acting General Counsel, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-15067 Filed 7-11-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Nitti, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 424]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Parker, J.), rendered June 19, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record establishes that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal as part of his plea agreement *(see People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273 [1992]; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1 [1989]). The defendant’s valid waiver precludes review of the issue he raises on appeal. Adams, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur.
IN RE JA.G.

No. COA06-1035.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (05J131, 05J132, 05J133).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended June 13, 2006 (the
Report) by ClubCorp, Inc. (Registrant), the undersigned hereby certifies that; to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  |                                         
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: July 27, 2006 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Jeffery P. Mayer
|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                      |  | Jeffrey P. Mayer Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrant and
will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Perrie Thomas WINDLESS.

No. 361P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Richard E. Jester, for Perrie T. Windless.

Susan K. Nichols, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of July 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
STATE v. Chaumon Marte WEBB.

No. 450P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2006.

Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

Jarvis John Edgerton, IV, for Webb.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of August 2005 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

"Motion for Stay Dissolved by order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of December 2006."
STATE v. GARRETT

No. COA06-255

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Jackson (04CRS52958).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
IN RE E.F.M.

No. COA07-227.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Surry (05J81A, 05J82A, 05J83A).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. MORGAN.

No. COA07-45.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 16, 2007.

Certification Date November 5, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (05CRS66800).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Charles HEATHERLY; Thomas Spampinato; W. Edward Goodall, Jr.; Paul Stam; Wake County Taxpayers Association; and the North Carolina Family Policy Council, Petitioner-Appellants Willis Williams; and North Carolina Common Sense Foundation, Petitioner-Intervenor-Appellants v. STATE of North Carolina; Charles A. Sanders, Bryan E. Beatty, Linda Carlisle, Robert A. Farris, Jr., John R. McArthur, Jim Woodward, and Robert W. Appleton, Members of the North Carolina Lottery Commission, in their official *650capacity; North Carolina Lottery Commission; Thomas N. Shaheen, Executive Director of the North Carolina Education Lottery, in his official capacity; Michael F. Easley, Governor of the State of North Carolina, in his official capacity; Richard H. Moore, Treasurer of the State of North Carolina, in his official capacity.

No. 317P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2006.

Robert F. Orr, Raleigh, Jeanette D. Brooks, for Heatherly, et al.

Jack Holtzman, for Willis Williams, et al.

Norma S. Harrell, Ronald M. Marquette, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, for State of NC, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioners and Petitioner Intervenors on the 15th day of June 2006 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of December 2006."
##### Form 10-Q Table of Contents

Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eden Bioscience Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rhett
R. Atkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 6, 2004

| |  |  |                                                                        
| |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | /s/ Rhett R. AtkinsRhett R. AtkinsPresident and Chief Executive Officer

---
In the Matter of M.E.H. appealed by Cynthia H.

No. 165P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Richard E. Jester, for Cynthia H.

Charles E. Frye, Jr., Lexington, for Davidson County DSS.

Laura Beck, Attorney Advocate, for Guardian ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of April 2007 by Respondent (Cynthia H.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Eden Bioscience Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rhett R. Atkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 4, 2006




/s/ Rhett R. AtkinsRhett R. Atkins President and Chief Executive Officer




-26-


---
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                   ------------



                                                        [GRAPHIC OMITTED]
                                                        [LOGO - GRANT THORNTON]
GRANT THORNTON LLP
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS






CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP


We hereby consent to the inclusion in Compton  Petroleum  Corporation's  Annual
Report on Form 40-F for the year ended  December  31, 2006 of our audit  report
dated March 23,  2007,  on  management's  assessment  of the  effectiveness  of
internal control over financial  reporting of Compton Petroleum  Corporation as
at  December  31,  2006,  to be filed with the  United  States  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  pursuant  to the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  as
amended.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Alberta
March 30, 2007




Suite 1000
112 - 4th Avenue SW
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 0H3
T   (403) 260-2500
F   (403) 260-2571
E   Calgary@GrantThornton.ca
W   www.GrantThornton.ca

Canadian Member of Grant Thornton International
PRICE v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF CORRECTION

No. COA06-492

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C.#TA-17385).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; Dismissed in part.
STATE of North Carolina v. Dwight PARKER, Sr.

No. 306P04-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Dwight Parker, Sr., Pro Se.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th day of April 2007 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Pitt County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."
NEBLETT v. HANOVER INSPECTION SERVICE, INC.

No. COA06-1676.

Court of appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 18, 2007.

Certification Date October 8, 2007.

Appeal from New Hanover (06CVS2113).

Case reported without published opinion affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2 

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Joseph F. McGuire, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of American Access Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4 The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 26, 2004 

 

/s/Joseph F. McGuire 

 

Treasurer and ChiefFinancial Officer
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3305 

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to establish, modify, charge, and 

collect recreation fees with respect to land and water administered by 

the Corps of Engineers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2008 

Mr. CHAMBLISS (for himself and Mr. ISAKSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Army to establish, modify, 

charge, and collect recreation fees with respect to land 

and water administered by the Corps of Engineers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Conserving Our Recre5 ation and Park Services Act of 2008’’ or the ‘‘CORPS 

6 Act of 2008’’. 

7 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF THE ARMY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Beginning on October 1, 2008, 

9 the Secretary of the Army may establish, modify, charge, 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3305 IS

1 and collect recreation fees with respect to any land or 

2 water administered by the Corps of Engineers in the same 

3 manner, and subject to the same terms and conditions, 

4 as the Secretary of the Interior may establish, modify, 

5 charge, and collect recreation fees with respect to Federal 

6 recreation land and water managed by the Bureau of Rec7 lamation pursuant to the Federal Lands Recreation En8 hancement Act (16 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.). 

9 (b) USE OF SPECIAL ACCOUNT FOR DEPOSIT AND

10 EXPENDITURE OF FEES.—The Secretary of the Treasury 

11 shall establish a special account in the Treasury of the 

12 United States for the Corps of Engineers, which shall be 

13 used for the same purpose, and subject to the same terms 

14 and conditions, as each special account established in the 

15 Treasury of the United States for each Federal land man16 agement agency under section 807(a) of the Federal 

17 Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (16 U.S.C. 6806(a)). 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3207 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to allow citizens 

who have concealed carry permits from the State in which they reside 

to carry concealed firearms in another State that grants concealed carry 

permits, if the individual complies with the laws of the State. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 26, 2008 

Mr. VITTER (for himself, Mr. BURR, Mr. DEMINT, Mr. STEVENS, and Mr. 

ENSIGN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to 

allow citizens who have concealed carry permits from 

the State in which they reside to carry concealed firearms in another State that grants concealed carry permits, if the individual complies with the laws of the 

State. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Respecting States 

5 Rights and Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2008’’. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•S 3207 IS

1 SEC. 2. RECIPROCITY FOR THE CARRYING OF CERTAIN 

2 CONCEALED FIREARMS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 44 of title 18, United 

4 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 926C 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘§ 926D. Reciprocity for the carrying of certain con7 cealed firearms 

8 ‘‘Notwithstanding any provision of the law of any 

9 State or political subdivision thereof: 

10 ‘‘(1) A person who is not prohibited by Federal 

11 law from possessing, transporting, shipping, or re12 ceiving a firearm, and is carrying a valid license or 

13 permit which is issued pursuant to the law of any 

14 State and which permits the person to carry a con15 cealed firearm, may carry in any State a concealed 

16 firearm in accordance with the terms of the license 

17 or permit, subject to the laws of the State in which 

18 the firearm is carried concerning specific types of lo19 cations in which firearms may not be carried. 

20 ‘‘(2) A person who is not prohibited by Federal 

21 law from possessing, transporting, shipping, or re22 ceiving a firearm, and is otherwise than as described 

23 in paragraph (1) entitled to carry a concealed fire24 arm in and pursuant to the law of the State in 

25 which the person resides, may carry in any State a 

26 concealed firearm in accordance with the laws of the 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•S 3207 IS

1 State in which the person resides, subject to the 

2 laws of the State in which the firearm is carried con3 cerning specific types of locations in which firearms 

4 may not be carried.’’. 

5 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

6 for chapter 44 of title 18 is amended by inserting after 

7 the item relating to section 926C the following: 

‘‘926D. Reciprocity for the carrying of certain concealed firearms.’’. 

8 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

9 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

10 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS