alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          62,502
<SECURITIES>                                     6,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  286,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               355,365
<PP&E>                                         116,979
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,781)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,492,266
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (2,992,448)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      (14,238)
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,045,130)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (5,492,266)
<SALES>                                        452,072
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               452,072
<CGS>                                      (3,758,395)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (3,758,395)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (235,445)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,540,860)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,540,860)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,540,860)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
STATE v. SILCOX.

No. COA06-772.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Rowan (03CRS51198).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
STATE v. Thomas Michael LARRY.

No. 189A95-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 18, 2007.

Elizabeth Hambourger, Durham, for Larry.

Diane Reeves, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of April 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Larry) shall have up to and including the 14th day of July 2007 to file and serve his/her Petition for Writ of Certiorari with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 18th day of April 2007."
# Council Decision 2014/728/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/728/CFSP of 20 October 2014 amending Decision 2010/638/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against            the Republic of Guinea         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/728/CFSP                     

# of 20 October 2014

# amending Decision 2010/638/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)On 25 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/638/CFSP(1).

(2)On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/638/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be extended until 27 October 2015.

(3)Decision 2010/638/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Decision 2010/638/CFSP is amended as follows:
          -  In Article 8, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:  ‘2.This Decision shall apply until 27 October 2015. It shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed or amended, as                                 appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Luxembourg, 20 October 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Ashton                            

1

Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP of 25 October 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea (OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 10).
VIRGIN v. VIRGIN.

No. COA05-1543.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (05CVS563)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, reversed and remanded in part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  255,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,600
<INVENTORY>                                    111,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               465,200
<PP&E>                                         560,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 230,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,062,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          303,900
<BONDS>                                        256,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0<F1>
<PREFERRED>                                          0<F1>
<COMMON>                                       192,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     298,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,062,700
<SALES>                                        546,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               546,500
<CGS>                                          138,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  138,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               142,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 82,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0<F1>
<CHANGES>                                            0<F1>
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.70
<FN>
<F1>Does not apply.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The undersigned  chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the
Registrant  hereby certify that, to their  knowledge,  this Quarterly  Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March 31, 2003 (the  "Report")  fully  complies
with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934, and the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                            By:/s/ Don Jennings
                               ----------------------------------------------
                               Name:    Don Jennings
                               Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer



                            By:/s/ R. Clay Hulette
                               ----------------------------------------------
                               Name:    R. Clay Hulette
                               Title:   Vice President and Chief Financial
                                        Officer

                                       Date: May 12, 2003
STATE v. CROWDER

No. COA05-193

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Union (99CRS17923, 99CRS17924, 00CRS3985).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part; remanded for a new sentencing hearing in 99CRS17923.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3241 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1717 Orange Avenue in Fort Pierce, Florida, 

as the ‘‘CeeCee Ross Lyles Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 3241 ES

1 SECTION 1. CEECEE ROSS LYLES POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1717 Orange Avenue in Fort 

4 Pierce, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘CeeCee Ross Lyles Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘CeeCee Ross Lyles 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate August 1, 2008. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3241 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ‘‘CeeCee Ross Lyles al Service located at 1717 Orange Avenue in
DYE v. DYE.

No. 291P07-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 8, 2007.

John B. Hatfield, Jr., Kathryn K. Hatfield, for Carey J. Dye.

Carey James Dye, Pro Se.

Daniel James Dye, Pro Se.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of October 2007 by Defendant for Transcription:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of November 2007."
# Council Implementing Decision 2014/24/CFSPShow full title

Council Implementing Decision 2014/24/CFSP of 20 January 2014 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures            against Belarus         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision 2014/24/CFSP                     

# of 20 January 2014

# implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP(1), and in particular Article 6(1) and 6(3) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 15 October 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.

(2)The Council considers that the reasons for the listing of one person as set out in the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP should                              be amended.

(3)The Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union.*                   

## ANNEXU.K.

[X1In the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP, entry No 199 shall be replaced by the following:]                   

Editorial Information

X1Substituted by Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2014/24/CFSP of 20 January 2014 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning                                 restrictive measures against Belarus (Official Journal of the European Union L 16 of 21 January 2014).

1

Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1).
HOCKNEY & ASSO. v. STATE of NC.

No. 353P05-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for State et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of September 2006 by Plaintiff demanding Supreme Court to issue order to show true ownership of property:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of October 2006."

Justice EDMUNDS recused.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 46/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 46/2013 of 21 January 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 46/2013                     

# of 21 January 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 January 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 17 -1929V Filed: September 28, 2018

UNPUBLISHED

KATHERINE J. RADER

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ; Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine;

Brachial Neuritis

Kathleen Margaret Loucks, Lommen Abdo Law Firm

, Minneapolis, MN, for petitioner. Glenn Alexander MacLeod, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On December 12, 2017, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.

, 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that, as a result of a Tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap” ) vaccination administered in her left deltoid on September 28, 2016, she suffered “left shoulder injuries.” Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On September 24, 2018

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for

eas e of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).2

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent states that “ based upon the record as it now stands, petitioner satisfies the legal prerequisites for an award of compensation under the Act for her [Brachial Neuritis] injury. Id. at 2

.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR CHARTER MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001043325
<NAME> CHARTER MUNICIPAL MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       9,681,712
<SECURITIES>                               633,993,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,089,338
<ALLOWANCES>                                   138,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               268,097
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             673,791,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       91,238,729
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 315,552,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               673,791,224
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,437,190
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,647,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,859,042
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,749,225
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             23,181,818
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                23,181,818
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-26-1997
<CASH>                                         16,478
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  45,053
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (810)
<INVENTORY>                                    359,773
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               421,304
<PP&E>                                         385,314
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (92,434)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 813,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          306,417
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       315
<OTHER-SE>                                     325,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   813,601
<SALES>                                        1,043,992
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,044,943
<CGS>                                          747,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  747,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               271,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,795
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                22,044
<INCOME-TAX>                                   9,306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            14,170
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   14,170
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.44
        


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Rcbert S. HILL.

No. 198P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Russell Hollers, III, Durham, for Robert Hill.

David Elliott, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of April 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
# L_2013186EN.01001201.xml

| 5.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 186/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 186/12

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2013/48/EU of 22 January 2013 amending Implementing Decision 2011/77/EU on granting Union financial assistance to Ireland

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 21 of 24 January 2013
  )

On page 30, Article 1(1), new point (c) of paragraph 8:

for:

‘... amortisation established under the 2011 PLAR, ...’,

read:

‘... amortisation in line with the 2011 PLAR, ...’;

on page 31, Article 1(2), new point (b) of paragraph 10:

for:

‘... amortisation established under the 2011 PLAR, ...’,

read:

‘... amortisation in line with the 2011 PLAR, ...’.

---
STATE v. CARPENTER.

No. COA06-1459.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Stanly (04CRS50129, 04CRS50130).

Case reported without published opinion Affirmed.