alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Council Decision of 28 January 2014 on the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial            contribution provided for in the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire (2013-2018) (2014/102/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 28 January 2014

# on the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Agreement                        between the European Union and the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire (2013-2018)                     

# (2014/102/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43, in conjunction with Article                           218(6)(a) thereof,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

(1)On 17 March 2008, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 242/2008 on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement                              between the European Community and the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire(1) (hereinafter the ‘Partnership Agreement’).

(2)The Union has negotiated a new Protocol with the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire granting Union vessels fishing opportunities in                              waters in which the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire exercises its sovereignty or jurisdiction with respect to fishing (hereinafter                              the ‘new Protocol’).

(3)The new Protocol was signed on the basis of Council Decision 2013/303/EU(2), and will be provisionally applied as from 1 July 2013.

(4)The new Protocol should be concluded,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Agreement between the European                     Union and the Republic of Côte d’Ivoire (2013-2018) (hereinafter the ‘new Protocol’) is hereby approved on behalf of the Union(3).                  

# Article 2U.K.

The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 14 of the new Protocol(4).                  

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

G. Stournaras                            

1

OJ L 75, 18.3.2008, p. 51.                           

2

OJ L 170, 22.6.2013, p. 1.                           

3

The new Protocol has been published in OJ L 170, 22.6.2013, p. 2, together with the decision on signature.                           

4

The date of entry into force of the new Protocol will be published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* by the General Secretariat of the Council.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18.U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theannual report of CharterMac (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year endingDecember 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Stuart J. Boesky, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/  Stuart J. Boesky    |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Stuart  J. Boesky        |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   | March  15, 2004          |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to CharterMac and will be retained byCharterMac and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.

 

----
# Council Implementing Decision 2014/24/CFSPShow full title

Council Implementing Decision 2014/24/CFSP of 20 January 2014 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures            against Belarus         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision 2014/24/CFSP                     

# of 20 January 2014

# implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP(1), and in particular Article 6(1) and 6(3) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 15 October 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.

(2)The Council considers that the reasons for the listing of one person as set out in the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP should                              be amended.

(3)The Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union.*                   

Done at Brussels, 20 January 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Ashton                            

## ANNEXU.K.

In the Annex to Decision 2012/642/CFSP, entry No. 210 shall be replaced by the following:

1

Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1).
# Council Decision 2014/538/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2014/538/CFSP of 8 July 2014 on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and            the Republic of Colombia establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Colombia in European Union crisis            management operations         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2014/538/CFSP                     

# of 8 July 2014

# on the signing and conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Colombia establishing a framework                        for the participation of the Republic of Colombia in European Union crisis management operations                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 37 thereof, in conjunction with Article 218(5) and                           (6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

(1)Conditions regarding the participation of third States in Union crisis management operations should be laid down in an agreement                              establishing a framework for such possible future participation, rather than being defined on a case-by-case basis for each                              operation concerned.

(2)Following the adoption of a Decision by the Council on 17 February 2014 authorising the opening of negotiations, the High                              Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy negotiated an Agreement between the European Union and                              the Republic of Colombia establishing a framework for the participation of the Republic of Colombia in European Union crisis                              management operations (‘the Agreement’).

(3)The Agreement should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Colombia establishing a framework for the participation of the                     Republic of Colombia in the European Union crisis management operations is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.                  

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind                     the Union.                  

# Article 3U.K.

The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 17(1) of the Agreement(1).                  

# Article 4U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

P. C. Padoan                            

1

The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* by the General Secretariat of the Council.
Garry Lee SKINNER, and wife, Judy Cooper Skinner; individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals v. Preferred CREDIT, also known as Preferred Credit Corporation, also known as Preferred Mortgage Company, also known as T.A.R. Preferred Mortgage Corporation; US Bank N.A.; US Bank NA, ND; Imperial Credit Industries, Inc; ICIFC Secured Assets Corporation 1997-1; Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1997-1; ICIFC Secured Assets Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1997-2; ICIFC Secured Assets Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1997-3; Empire Funding Home Loan Owner Trust 1998-1; Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corporation; CS First Boston Mortgage Securities Corporation Preferred Mortgage Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 1996-2; Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corporation Preferred Credit Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 1997-1; Bankers Trust Company; Gmac-Residential Funding Corporation; Life Bank; Life Financial Home Loan Owner Trust 1997-3; United Mortgage C.B., LLC; Banc One Financial Services; IMH Assets Corp. Collateralized Asset-Backed Bonds Series 1999-1; and Wilmington Trust Company.

No. 525A05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 15, 2007.

Gary K. Shipman, William G. Wright, Wilmington, A. Hoyt Rowell, III, Daniel Myers, Mt. Pleasant, SC, Eric G. Calhoun, Dallas, TX, for Skinners et al.

Hada V. Haulsee, Ronald R. Davis, Bradley R. Johnson, Winston-Salem, for Preferred.

Robert R. Marcus, Angela L. Little, Greensboro, Daniel J. Tobin, for Impac Funding.

Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Solicitor-General, Gary R. Govert, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Attorney General.

Seth P. Rosebrock, for CRL.

Carlene McNulty, for N.C. Justice Center.

Kenneth L. Schorr, Charlotte, for LSSP.

William J. Whalen, for Pisgah Legal Services.

*592Susan Gottsegen, Winston-Salem, for LASNNC.

Maria D. McIntyre, for FPLC.

Paul H. Stock, Robert A. Singer, Kathleen Gleason, Greensboro, for NC Bankers Asso.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 24th day of January 2007 for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th day of February 2007."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER CHARLES BARTOLUCCI,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF DRIVER LICENSING,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 43 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19th day of June, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
##### 



[EDELBROCK LOGO]

Exhibit 10.0

JEFFREY L. THOMPSON
 Executive Vice President
  Chief Operating Officer

|                 |                       
|---------------- | ----------------------
|October 27, 2003 | VIA FACSIMILE AND MAIL

Mr. Fred Gopal
President and CEO
Magneti Marelli Powertrain USA, Inc.
2101 Nash Street
Sanford, NC 27331-0548

RE:     2004
Calendar Year

Dear Fred:

As a follow-up to our telephone
conversation this morning, as consideration of Magneti Marelli
reducing the anticipated price increase on the Edelbrock Performer
Series EPS and AVS Carburetors for calendar year 2004 to 2%,
Edelbrock will be
willing to commit to a total purchase of 185,000 units for the 2004
calendar year.

This letter serves to amend our
current Agreement in place dated September 26, 2001. All other
terms and conditions shall remain in full force and effect covering
said Agreement.

On behalf of Edelbrock, we appreciate
your assistance in helping to reduce the anticipated price increase
to the lower amount and look forward to an equally exciting 2004.

Sincerely,

/s/ Jeffrey L. Thompson

Jeffrey L. Thompson
Executive Vice President

JLT:lm

|    |                         
|--- | ------------------------
|cc: | Vic Edelbrock
Arty Feles

Accepted this 31st day of October 2003.

|       |               
|------ | --------------
|By:    | /s/ Fred Gopal
|Title: | President/CEO 

2700 California Street 
Torrance, California 90503
(310) 972-2701  Fax: (310) 320-3964  email:
JThompson@edelbrock.com
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DANIEL CEDILLOS

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00180

- C R

Appeal from the

346 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20130D02144 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant ’s fourth motion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until July 8 , 201 7

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE APPELLANT ’S BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Ruben P. Morales

, Appellant’ s attorney, prepare

the Appellant ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before July 8 , 201 7

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9 th day of June , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McCl ure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox , JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 30, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 51399]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-17171]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board; Public 
Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Small Business 
Development Centers, National Advisory Board will be hosting its annual 
quarterly meeting to discuss such matters that may be presented by 
members, the staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, and 
interested others. The meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, September 7, 
2005, starting at 2:45 until 6 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The meeting 
will take place at the Marriott Waterfront Hotel, 700 Aliceanna Street, 
Board Room, Baltimore, MD 21202.
    Anyone wishing to attend must contact Erika Fischer, Senior Program 
Analyst, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Small Business 
Development Centers, 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, 
telephone (202) 205-7045 or fax (202) 481-0681.

Matthew K. Becker,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-17171 Filed 8-29-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 595/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 595/2013 of 21 June 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 595/2013                     

# of 21 June 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 June 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1084

___________

Ethridge Dyer; Eloise Dyer, Husband *

and Wife, *

 *

Appellants, *

 *

v. *

 *

K. Marcus Poemoceah, M.D.; John D. * Appeal from the United States

Alston, M.D., also known as Jack D. * District Court for the

Alston; Gravette Medical Associates, * Western District of Arkansas. 

Ltd; Northwest Arkansas Surgical *

Clinic, P.A., * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellees, *

 *

Tom Crosby, M.D., *

 *

Movant. *

___________

 Submitted: February 5, 1999

 Filed: March 19, 1999

___________

Before McMILLIAN, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.
1The Honorable H. FRANKLIN WATERS, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas. 

-2-

Ethridge Dyer and Eloise Dyer, husband and wife, appeal from the district

court’s1 adverse judgment upon a jury verdict, and its order denying them judgment

as a matter of law or a new trial, in their diversity action claiming medical

malpractice. After careful review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court in its order, and we reject as meritless the

Dyers& additional claim of instructional error. For the first time on appeal, the Dyers

challenge remarks made by opposing counsel during closing argument; reviewing for

plain error, we conclude that none of the challenged remarks prejudiced any of the

Dyers’ substantial rights. See Rush v. Smith, 56 F.3d 918, 922 (8th Cir.) (en banc),

cert. denied, 516 U.S. 959 (1995). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0323

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RANDY VAUGHN SNEED,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 6, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 28 2022

02/28/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0323
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.000
<CASH>                          2,001
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   3,477
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,478
<PP&E>                          1,716,574
<DEPRECIATION>                  83,713
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,787,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           20,954
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     11
<COMMON>                        32
<OTHER-SE>                      787,361
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,787,978
<SALES>                         129,193
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                141,032
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   73,173
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                4,773
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              32,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 27,932
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             27,932
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 (303)
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    27,629
<EPS-BASIC>                   0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.52



</TABLE>