alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
State of Vermont Superior Court—Environmental Division

=================================================== =================== E N T R Y R E G A R D I N G M O T I O N

=================================================== ===================
In Re Bjerke Zoning Permit Denial Docket No. 72-5-11 Vtec

Title: Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 1) Filed: December 12, 2011 Filed by: Applicant/Appellant Alan A. Bjerke Response filed on January 19, 2012 by Interested Pe rson City of Burlington

Granted Denied X Other

Alan A. Bjerke (Applicant) appeals the City of Burl ington Development Review Board’s (the DRB) denial of his application for a zoning pe rmit to make certain modifications to property he owns in the City of Burlington, Vermont . In support of his appeal to this Court, Applicant submitted a Statement of Questions contai ning three Questions. Currently pending before the Court is Applicant’s motion for summary judgment on Question 1, which asks whether his permit application was deemed approved under the City of Burlington Comprehensive Development Ordinance (Ordinance) Sec tion 3.2.5 and 24 V.S.A. § 4448(d).
For the reasons detailed in this Court’s March 22, 2012 Decision, we conclude that the undisputed facts indicate that the City took approp riate action on Applicant’s application within 30 days of its submission. Thus, the applic ation is not deemed approved under 24 V.S.A. § 4448(d) or the Ordinance. In our March 22, 2012 Decision we DENIED Applicant’s motion for summary judgment on Question 1. We also advised th e parties that we were inclined to conclude that the City is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Question 1. However, pursuant to the new version of V.R.C.P. 56, we gave Applicant notice and a reasonable time to respond to the Court’s intended action. Neither pa rty filed a response to our March 22, 2012 Decision. Accordingly, for the reasons detailed in this Court ’s March 22, 2012 Decision, we GRANT summary judgment in favor of the City of Burlingto n on Question 1 of Applicant’s Statement of Questions. Applicant’s Questions 2 an d 3 remain pending before this Court, and the Court will now set this matter for trial. On o r before Friday, April 27, 2012 , parties shall provide to the Court, in writing, their dates of un availability for a one-day trial in July and August, 2012.

_________________________________________ April 17, 2012 Thomas G. Walsh, Judge Date

=================================================== ========================== Date copies sent to: ____________ Clerk's Initials _______ Copies sent to: Attorney Alan A. Bjerke, representing himself Kimberly J. Sturtevant, Attorney for Interested Person City of Burlington
EX-32.1





Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





I-Element
      Corporation, Inc. CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS


ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of IElement Corporation on Form 10-KSB/A for
      the
      period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange


Commission
      on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ivan Zweig, Chief Executive Officer
      of IElement Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as


adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of IElement, Inc.





Date:
      August 31, 2006





/s/
      Ivan
      Zweig


-----------------


Ivan
      Zweig


Chief
      Executive Officer
DRIGGERS v. DRIGGERS.

No. COA06-1038.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 21, 2007.

Certification Date September 10, 2007.

Appeal from Cabarrus (5CVD2401).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
# Council Decision of 8 October 2014 appointing a Danish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions (2014/712/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 8 October 2014

# appointing a Danish alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/712/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Danish Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015. On 3 June 2010, by Council Decision 2010/312/EU(3), Mr Lasse KRULL was appointed as alternate member until 25 January 2015.

(2)An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Lasse KRULL PETERSEN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term                     of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:                  
          -  Mr Peter KOFOD POULSEN, *Member of the Regional Council of Region of Southern Denmark*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 8 October 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

M. Lupi                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.                           

3

OJ L 140, 8.6.2010, p. 27.
cc: Eighth Judicial District Court, Dept. J DeAnn Justine Wiesner Daniel Allan Wiesner Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A ea'
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Lason, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-18551) of our report dated March 26, 1997,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Lason, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years
ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994, which report is included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K.

Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.

   
Detroit, Michigan
April 3, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
J. B. WILLIAMS HOLDINGS, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED JULY 3, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929651
<NAME>                        J.B. Williams Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUL-03-1999
<CASH>                                               6,912
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8,852
<ALLOWANCES>                                           262
<INVENTORY>                                         12,015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    28,087
<PP&E>                                               4,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      76,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                8,789
<BONDS>                                             50,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            10,800
<OTHER-SE>                                           5,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        76,355
<SALES>                                             29,697
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    29,697
<CGS>                                               11,265
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       11,265
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    17,378
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,955
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (1,901)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (779)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (1,901)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (1,122)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (112.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (112.20)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                          EXHIBIT 21

                   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

    The following is a list of Solutia's subsidiaries as of December 31,
1999, except for unnamed subsidiaries which, considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant
subsidiary.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Percentage of
                                                              Voting Power
                                                                Owned by
                                                                 Solutia
                                                              -------------
<S>                                                           <C>
Monchem, Inc................................................      100%

Monchem International, Inc..................................      100%

Solutia Systems, Inc........................................      100%

Solutia International Sales, Inc............................       99%

Solutia Europe S.A./N.V.....................................      100%

Alhadar Holding B.V.........................................      100%

Solutia Netherlands International B.V.......................      100%

Solutia Deutschland Holding GmbH............................      100%
</TABLE>

                                 22
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00237-CV

Rita DIAZ and A/N/F of Roxanna Gonzalez, Rita Gonzalez and Rolando Gonzalez Jr.,

Appellant

v.

Gregorio LOPEZ,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CVA000591-D4

Honorable David E. Garcia, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: June 29, 2022

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On March 23, 2018, Appellee Gregorio Lopez filed an original petition for bill of review 

in a negligence action, requesting a default judgment be set aside or vacated. On April 22, 2022, 

the trial court signed an order granting Lopez’s petition for bill of review. That same day, Appellant 

Rita Diaz filed a notice of appeal, stating she intends to appeal the trial court’s order granting 

Lopez’s bill of review.

In Jordan v. Jordan, the Texas Supreme Court held a trial court’s order granting a bill of 

review, but not disposing of the case on the merits, is interlocutory and not appealable. 907 S.W.2d 
04-22-00237-CV

- 2 -

471, 472 (Tex. 1995). Thus, the Supreme Court held the court of appeals lacked jurisdiction over 

the appeal. See id.; see also Kiefer v. Touris, 197 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2006).

In this case, the clerk’s record reflects the trial court granted the bill of review, thus setting 

aside the default judgment. However, nothing in the clerk’s record reflects the trial court entered 

a final judgment disposing of the case on the merits. It therefore appears the trial court’s order was 

interlocutory and not appealable. See Jordan, 907 S.W.2d at 472.

On May 17, 2022, this court ordered Diaz to show cause in writing by June 1, 2022 why 

this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In lieu of a response, Diaz filed a notice 

of nonsuit stating the “[a]ppeal is not a proper vehicle for this matter.” Nothing in Diaz’s notice 

establishes jurisdiction in this court over the appeal. Because the trial court’s order is interlocutory 

and not appealable, see Jordan, 907 S.W.2d at 472, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
| (1)  |  the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,      2009 (“the Report”) which this certification accompanies fully complies      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));and |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)  |  the information contained in the Report      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and      results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                 |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:    | /s/ GEORGE      E. STRICKLER                                    |   |
|   |   | George      E. Strickler                                             |   |
|   |   | Executive      Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |
|   |   | March      15, 2010                                                  |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                                  294,969
<SECURITIES>                                                             36,474
<RECEIVABLES>                                                           628,039
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                              35,293
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        994,775
<PP&E>                                                                  412,841
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         (102,691)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                        1,855,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                   200,756
<BONDS>                                                                 408,790
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                              4,916,398
<OTHER-SE>                                                                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                          1,855,807
<SALES>                                                                 310,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        310,345
<CGS>                                                                 2,659,850
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                         2,659,850
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        313,279
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                     (189,374)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (2,662,784)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  (2,349,505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                               (63,020)
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (2,725,804)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                              (0.072)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                 0


</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2013 of 16 August 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2013                     

# of 16 August 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 August 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 97/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 97/2013 of 1 February 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 97/2013                     

# of 1 February 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 February 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.