alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# The Rates (Temporary Rebate) (Amendment) Order (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2013 No. 15

Rates

# The Rates (Temporary Rebate) (Amendment) Order (Northern Ireland) 2013

Made

31st January 2013

Affirmed by resolution of the Assembly on

25th February 2013

Coming into operation

1st April 2013

The Department of Finance and Personnel makes the following Order in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 31D(15) and                           (16) of the Rates (Northern Ireland) Order 1977 F1.                        

F1S.I. 1977/2157 (N.I. 28); Article 31D was inserted by section 2 of the Rates (Amendment) Act (Northern Ireland) 2012 (c.1 (N.I.))

## Citation and commencementN.I.

1.  This Order may be cited as the Rates (Temporary Rebate) (Amendment) Order (Northern Ireland) 2013 and shall come into operation                     on 1st April 2013.                  

## Temporary rebate for certain previously unoccupied hereditaments etc.N.I.

2.  In Article 31D of the Rates (Northern Ireland) Order 1977 (temporary rebate for certain previously unoccupied hereditaments                     etc.)—                  

(a)in paragraph (2) for “1st April 2013” there shall be substituted “ 1st April 2015 ”; and                  

(b)in paragraph (3)(b) for “the year ending on 31st March 2013” there shall be substituted “ the three year period ending on 31st March 2015 ”.                  

Sealed with the Official Seal of the Department of Finance and Personnel on 31st January 2013

L.S.

Brian McClure

 A senior officer of the

Department of Finance and Personnel

## Explanatory Note

(This note is not part of the Order)

Article 31D of the Rates (Northern Ireland) Order 1977 provides for a rebate on occupied rates for retail properties which                        become occupied during the year ending on 31st March 2013 after having been unoccupied for a continuous period of at least                        twelve months. The amount of the rebate is one half of the rates chargeable in respect of the net annual value of the property                        and is granted for a period of twelve months.                     

This Order provides for the rebate to be granted during the two year period ending on 31st March 2015.
IN RE S.M.

No. COA06-842

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Wake (05J485).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
# Council Decision of 31 March 2014 appointing a Luxembourg member and two Luxembourg alternate members of the Committee of            the Regions (2014/182/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 31 March 2014

# appointing a Luxembourg member and two Luxembourg alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/182/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Luxembourg Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Dan KERSCH.

(3)An alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Yves CRUCHTEN. An alternate member's                              seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Roby BIWER as member of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which                     runs until 25 January 2015:                  

as member:
                -  Mr Roby BIWER, *Conseiller communal de la commune de Bettembourg*;                                  

and

as alternate members:
                -  Mr Tom JUNGEN, *Bourgmestre de la commune de Roeser*,                                  
                -  Ms Christine SCHWEICH, *Bourgmestre de la commune de Mondercange*.                                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 31 March 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

D. Kourkoulas                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 50408]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16959]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Storage Bridge Bay Working Group, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 9, 2005, pursuant to Section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et. seq. (``the Act''), Storage Bridge Bay Working 
Group, Inc. (``SBB'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the name and principal place of business of the standards 
development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards 
development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place 
of business of the Standards development organization is: Storage 
Bridge Bay Working Group, Inc., Redwood City, CA. The nature and scope 
of SBB's standards development activities are: Promoting the computer 
industry by supporting and facilitating the development of 
interoperable and compatible storage components with reference to 
controller slot compatibility between and among storage solutions. 
These purposes include the objective of developing and publishing a 
``storage bridge bay'' specification that will serve as a reference and 
guideline for defining physical, mechanical, electrical and low-level 
enclosure management requirements for an enclosure controller slot that 
will support a variety of storage controllers from a variety of 
independent hardware vendors and independent software vendors. Any 
storage controller design based on this specification shall be able to 
fit, connect, and operate within any storage enclosure controller slot 
design based on the same specification.

Dorothy B. Fountain,
Deputy Director of Operations Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 05-16959 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
STATE v. BATTLE.

No. COA07-97.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Halifax (03CRS54974).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
IN RE R.G.

No. COA06-586.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 20, 2007.

Certification Date March 12, 2007.

Appeal from Wayne (05J18).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
---

##### Form 10-Q Table of Contents

Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of EDEN Bioscience Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rhett
R. Atkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 5, 2003

| |  |  |                                                                        
| |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | /s/ Rhett R. AtkinsRhett R. AtkinsPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2013295EN.01000201.xml

| 11.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 7 October 2013

adopting the Council position on draft amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2013

2013/C 295/03

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1), and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| — | the Union's budget for the financial year 2013 was definitively adopted on 12 December 2012 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union's budget for the financial year 2013 was definitively adopted on 12 December 2012 (2),

2

| — | on 25 July 2013, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 7 to the general budget for the financial year 2013, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 25 July 2013, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 7 to the general budget for the financial year 2013,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 7 of the European Union for the financial year 2013 was adopted on 7 October 2013.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Luxembourg, 7 October 2013.

For the Council

The President

J. BERNATONIS

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 66, 8.3.2013, p. 1, with corrigendum in OJ L 134, 18.5.2013, p. 21.

2

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DOMONIQUE SHARAD ALLEN
,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 855

[ January 28, 2015 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Robert L. Pegg , Judge; L.T. Case No.

312012CF001548A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, Assistant Attorney Gen eral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

. See Barfield v. State , 871 So. 2d 929 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

W ARNER
, G ROSS and C IKLIN
, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of American Access Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006, I, Timothy C. Adams, President, Principal Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1. Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of American Access Technologies, Inc.

Date: March 8, 2007



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Timothy C. Adams                 
|Timothy C. Adams                     
|President and Chief Operating Officer
STATE v. AIKEN.

No. COA06-1456.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS64976, 05CRS8654).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part; Reversed and remanded in part.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5736 

AN ACT 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient 

clinic in Gadsden, Alabama, as the Colonel Ola Lee Mize 

Veterans Clinic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5736 EH

1 SECTION 1. FINDING. 

2 Congress finds that Colonel Ola Lee Mize, a Medal 

3 of Honor recipient, is a highly decorated veteran from the 

4 State of Alabama. 

5 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF6 FAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC IN GADSDEN, 

7 ALABAMA. 

8 The Department of Veterans Affairs community 

9 based outpatient clinic in Gadsden, Alabama, shall be 

10 known and designated as the ‘‘Colonel Ola Lee Mize Vet11 erans Clinic’’. Any reference to such community based out12 patient clinic in any law, regulation, map, document, 

13 record, or other paper of the United States shall be consid14 ered to be a reference to the Colonel Ola Lee Mize Vet15 erans Clinic. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 

2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5736 

AN ACT 

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs 

Colonel Ola Lee Mize Veterans Clinic. outpatient clinic in Gadsden, Alabama, as the
<PAGE>


               EXHIBIT 15.1 - - INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT



Board of Directors
Price Enterprises, Inc.


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Price
Enterprises, Inc. as of March 16, 1997, and the related consolidated statements
of income for the twelve and twenty-eight week periods ended March 16, 1997 and
March 17, 1996, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the
twenty-eight week periods ended March 16, 1997 and March 17, 1996.  These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, which will be
performed for the full year with the objective of expressing an opinion
regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not
express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements referred to above
for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the consolidated balance sheet of Price Enterprises, Inc. as of
August 31, 1996, and the related statements of income, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report
dated October 9, 1996, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 1996, is fairly stated,
in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from
which it has been derived.




ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Diego, California
April 11, 1997

                                          18
STATE v. CURRY.

No. COA07-208.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Davidson (05CRS56923).

Case reported without published opinion No error.
Exhibit 11

PAULA FINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES  Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share  (In thousands, except per share data)

|                                                                             |  | Three Months Ended
June 30, |           | Six Months Ended
June 30,
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | --------- | -------------------------
|
|Net income                                                                   |  | $                           | 50        |                          
|                                                                             |  |                             |           |                          
|Weighted average shares outstanding for calculating basic earnings per share |  |                             | 6,091,756 |                          
|Options                                                                      |  |                             | 26,721    |                          
|                                                                             |  |                             |           |                          
|Total shares for calculating diluted earnings per share                      |  |                             | 6,118,477 |                          
|                                                                             |  |                             |           |                          
|Basic earnings per share                                                     |  | $                           | 0.01      |                          
|                                                                             |  |                             |           |                          
|Diluted earnings per share                                                   |  | $                           | 0.01      |                          
|                                                                             |  |                             |           |                          

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dril-Quip, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jerry M. Brooks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|                                                         
|                                                         
|/s/ Jerry M. Brooks                                      
|Jerry M. Brooks Chief Financial Officer February 28, 2008
In re M.C., A Minor Juvenile.

No. COA06-886.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

May 1, 2007.

Appeal by respondent juvenile, M.C., from orders entered 17 March 2006 by Judge J.H. Corpening, II, in New Hanover County District Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 16 April 2007.

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General Mabel Y. Bullock, for the State.

Peter Wood, for respondent-appellant.

McCULLOUGH, Judge.

Respondent M.C. appeals from adjudication and disposition orders finding him delinquent for misdemeanor larceny. On appeal, respondent raises two assignments of error. However, the dispositive issue is whether the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enter the adjudication and disposition orders due to the untimely filing of the juvenile petition. In its brief, the State concedes that the petition was not timely filed and the trial court's orders must be vacated.

As an initial matter, we note that respondent did not raise this issue before the trial court. Nevertheless, questions regarding whether the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over the case may be raised *387for the first time on appeal and, therefore, the issue is properly before us. *See State v. Beaver,*291 N.C. 137, 139-40, 229 S.E.2d 179, 181 (1976).

Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1703(b), a juvenile petition must be filed "within 15 days after the complaint is received" by the juvenile court counselor. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1703(b) (2005). The statute also provides that an extension of an additional fifteen days may be granted at the discretion of the chief court counselor. *Id.* Consequently, the juvenile petition must be filed within a maximum of thirty days after the complaint is received by the juvenile court counselor.

Here, the only indication of when the juvenile court counselor received the complaint is the date that the petition was verified by a Wilmington Police Department detective: 1 November 2005. The petition was filed with the trial court on 2 December 2005. The time period from 1 November 2005 to 2 December 2005 is more than thirty days. As the petition was filed outside the statutory maximum time of thirty days in accordance with N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1703(b), we conclude the trial court erred by asserting jurisdiction over M.C. Accordingly, the adjudication and disposition orders of the trial court must be vacated and this case remanded to the New Hanover County District Court for entry of an order dismissing the action.

Vacated and remanded.

Judges STEELMAN and LEVINSON concur.