alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3279 

To provide funding for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, 

and to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to deny the deduction 

for income attributable to domestic production of oil, gas, or primary 

products thereof for major integrated oil companies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 17, 2008 

Mr. GREGG (for himself and Mr. SUNUNU) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide funding for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, and to amend the Internal Revenue Code 

of 1986 to deny the deduction for income attributable 

to domestic production of oil, gas, or primary products 

thereof for major integrated oil companies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home Energy Assist5 ance Today Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3279 IS

1 SEC. 2. LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE APPRO2 PRIATIONS. 

3 In addition to any amounts appropriated under any 

4 other provision of Federal law, there is appropriated, out 

5 of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, 

6 for fiscal year 2008— 

7 (1) $1,265,000,000 (to remain available until 

8 expended) for making payments under subsections 

9 (a) through (d) of section 2604 of the Low-Income 

10 Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 

11 8623); and 

12 (2) $1,265,000,000 (to remain available until 

13 expended) for making payments under section 

14 2604(e) of the Low-Income Home Energy Assist15 ance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 8623(e)), notwith16 standing the designation requirement of section 

17 2602(e) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 8621(e)). 

18 SEC. 3. DENIAL OF DEDUCTION FOR MAJOR INTEGRATED 

19 OIL COMPANIES FOR INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE 

20 TO DOMESTIC PRODUCTION OF OIL, GAS, OR 

21 PRIMARY PRODUCTS THEREOF. 

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

23 199(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating 

24 to exceptions) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of 

25 clause (ii), by striking the period at the end of clause (iii) 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•S 3279 IS

1 and inserting ‘‘, or’’, and by inserting after clause (iii) the 

2 following new clause: 

3 ‘‘(iv) in the case of any major inte4 grated oil company (as defined in section 

5 167(h)(5)(B)), the production, refining, 

6 processing, transportation, or distribution 

7 of oil, gas, or any primary product thereof 

8 during any taxable year described in sec9 tion 167(h)(5)(B).’’. 

10 (b) PRIMARY PRODUCT.—Section 199(c)(4)(B) of 

11 such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 

12 flush sentence: 

13 ‘‘For purposes of clause (iv), the term ‘primary 

14 product’ has the same meaning as when used in 

15 section 927(a)(2)(C), as in effect before its re16 peal.’’. 

17 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

19 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE  NINE MONTH  PERIOD  ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929299
<NAME>                        ISOLYSER COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               5,256<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       18,519
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,872
<INVENTORY>                                         23,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    69,206
<PP&E>                                              33,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                      14,688
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     119,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               40,717
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                40
<OTHER-SE>                                          74,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       119,821
<SALES>                                            116,216
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   116,216
<CGS>                                               86,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       86,859
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    39,110
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (12,357)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           229
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (12,604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (12,604)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.32)
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES CASH EQUIVALENTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN RE K.H.

No. COA06-1129

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from Harnett (04J82, 04J83).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 10.18**

Unwritten Employment Contract for named executive officer- February 2007. 

Mr. Joseph F. McGuire, one of the named executive officers,as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table is an “at will” employee and does not have a written employment agreement. 

The CompensationCommittee has established Mr. McGuire’s current base annual salary at $127,500. 

Mr. McGuire may receive bonus payments if granted by theCompensation Committee. He is also eligible to receive grants of stock or options under the 2004 Employee Stock Incentive Plan and as a director may receive options under the 2004 Director Stock Option Plan. Any grants under the 2004 Employee StockIncentive Plan are set by the Compensation Committee. Grants under the 2004 Director Stock Option Plan are pursuant to a formula set forth in the plan. As an employee, he is eligible to receive employee benefits generally available to all employeesof the Company.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, George
E. Strickler, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
of Stoneridge, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2008
(“the Report”) which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      GEORGE E. STRICKLERGeorge E. Strickler, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerMarch
      11, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
LONG v. NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 267P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Beth Hancock, Associate Attorney General, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of May 2006 by Plaintiff for "Petition":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of August 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSENSED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         1,134
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,245
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    885,565
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               927,302
<PP&E>                                         26,170
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 967,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,207,267
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,563,778
<COMMON>                                       9,537
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,377,754)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   967,638
<SALES>                                        64,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               64,249
<CGS>                                          44,332
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  44,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,382,788)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,382,788)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,382,788)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.20)
        


</TABLE>
GARY HARRIS, JOSEPH B. KINARD, JOHN S. EAGLE, WAYMON TATE, JR., RAYFORD JONES, JOHN L. MCGRIFF, LESLEY G. BELLINGER, the Plaintiffs suing on behalf of SAINT LUKE MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH, Plaintiffs v. CLIFFORD J. MATTHEWS, JR., SHARLA BYRD, and AARON MOORE, Defendants.

No. 479PA05-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina

August 17, 2006

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 7th day of March 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Plaintiffs, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006.
STATE of North Carolina v. Rodney Keith WATTS.

No. 639P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Don Willey, for Rodney Keith Watts.

Daniel Addison, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of December 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
Exhibit 15.1













Club  Corporation  International
Dallas,  Texas

Ladies  and  Gentlemen:

Re:    Registration  Statements  Nos.  33-89818,  33-96568  and  333-08041

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we acknowledge our
awareness  of  the use therein of our report dated November 6, 1996 related to
our  review  of  interim  financial  information.

Pursuant  to  Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered  part  of  a  registration  statement  prepared  or certified by an
accountant  or  a  report  prepared  or  certified by an accountant within the
meaning  of  sections  7  and  11  of  the  Act.

                                   Very  truly  yours,




                                   KPMG  Peat  Marwick  LLP



Dallas,  Texas
November  12,  1996
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2992330-DEC-201002:17 PM
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: John Klumb, Veronica McCleiland, Vivian Montejano, John

Gonzalez, Anita Robles, and Charmaine Pilgrim on Behalf of

Themselves and All others Similarly Situated; City of Houston v.

Houston Municipal Employees Pension System, et al.,

Appellate case number: 01-12-00511-CV

Trial court case number: 1175492

Trial court: 234th District Court of Harris County

Appellants have filed a motion for oral argument in the above cause. The motion is granted.

The cause is removed from the Court’s February 19, 2013 submission docket. The cause will be

set for submission on March 5, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. The Court will hear oral argument at that

time.~

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:/s/Laura C. Higley

[] Acting individually [] Acting for the Court

Date: February 4, 2013

~ This Court’s Clerk’s Office will send a submission notice at a later time to the parties including

more details pertaining to submission and argument.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 988/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 988/2013 of 14 October 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 988/2013                     

# of 14 October 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Notices 51023 

[FR Doc. 05–17089 Filed 8–26–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

[Transmittal No. 05–21] 

36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification 

AGENCY: Department of Defense, Defense 

Security Cooperation Agency. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is 

publishing the unclassified text of a 

section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. 

This is published to fulfill the 

requirements of section 155 of Public 

Law 104–164 dated 21 July 1996. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

J. Hurd, DSCA/DBO/ADM, (702) 604–

6575. 

The following is a copy of a letter to 

the Speaker of the House of 

Representatives, Transmittal 05–21 with 

attached transmittal, policy justification, 

and Sensitivity of Technology. 

Dated: August 23, 2005. 

Jeannette Owings-Ballard, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, 

Department of Defense. 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–M 


EN29AU05.032</GPH>
51024 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Notices 


EN29AU05.033</GPH>
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Notices 51025 


EN29AU05.034</GPH>
51026 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 166 / Monday, August 29, 2005 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 05–17090 Filed 8–26–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–C 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Defense Science Board 

AGENCY: Department of Defense. 

ACTION: Notice of advisory committee 

meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Defense Science Board 

Task Force on Organizational Structures 

for Stabilization Operations will meet in 

open session September 2, 2005, from 

1300–1700 at the Pentagon, Room 

3E947, Washington, DC. The task force 

will address organizational structures 

necessary to support or conduct stability 

operations. At this meeting, the Defense 

Science Board Task Force will focus on: 

(1) What organizational change is 

needed within OSD Policy, the Joint 

Staff and the rest of DoD to manage 

implementation—that is, to ensure that 

the designated capabilities are created 

and the interagency and joint vision are 

followed at various DoD levels; (2) What 

organizational change is needed within 

DoD to improve our ability to conduct 

or support stability operations—

including employing and integrating 

DoD capabilities with those of other 

Departments and Agencies, NGOs, 

international organizations and the 

private sector; (3) What should be the 

timing and sequence of organization 

change within DoD; (4) What additional 

staffing is required for any new or 


EN29AU05.035</GPH>
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 893/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 893/2013 of 16 September 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for mackerel in areas IIIa            and IVbc by vessels flying the flag of the Netherlands         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 893/2013                     

# of 16 September 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for mackerel in areas IIIa and IVbc by vessels flying the flag of the Netherlands

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 September 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.