alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT HOR AC E THOM AS, AKA Hora c e Andre wB e ll, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. M ERLE B R

UC E, M .D., De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 14-16204 D.C . No. 2:14-c v-00619-M M DC W H M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da M iranda Du, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 21, 2015 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, GOULD, a n d N.R . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. Hora c e Thom a s , a .k.a . Hora c e Andre w B e ll, a C a l ifornia

sta t e prisone r, a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his 42 U.S.C . § 1983 a c tion a lle ging a

n Eighth Ame ndm e nt viola tion. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28



# FIL ED JAN 30 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).U.S.C . § 1291. W e re v ie w de n ovo a dism issa l for fa ilure to sta te a c la im . W e i lburg v . Shapiro , 488 F.3d 1202, 1205 (9th C i r. 2007) (dismissa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915A); Barre n v . Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th C ir. 1998) (orde r) (dism i ssa l unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1915(e )(2)(B )(ii)). W e va c ate and re m and. Although the distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d Thom a s’ s c om pla int be c a

use Thom a s fa ile d to a lle g e fa c t s suffic ie nt to sta te a de libe rate indiffe re nc e c l a im re lating to his ja

w surge ry , the distric t c ourt a buse d its disc re tion by

dism issing Thom a s’ s a c tion without first providing him with a n opportunity

to a m e nd. Se e W e i lburg , 488 F.3d a

t 1205 (“ Dism issa l of a

pro se c om

p la i nt without le ave to am e nd is prope r only

if it is a b solute ly c le ar that the de fic ie nc ie s of the c om pla int c ould not bec ure d by

am e ndm e nt.” (c ita

tion a nd inte rna l quota

tion m arks om i tte d)); Lope

z v . Smith , 203 F.3d 1122, 1130 (9th C i r. 2000) (e n ba nc ) (se tting forth sta nda rd of re vie w). Ac c ordingly , we va c ate the judgm e nt a nd re m and to the distric t c o urt with instruc tions to provide Thom a s with a

n opportunity

to file an am e nde d c o m

pla int. V ACAT E D and RE M ANDE D .

1 4 - 1 6 2 0 4 2
<PAGE>   1
                             FLORSHEIM GROUP INC.                    EXHIBIT 11

          STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Months    Three Months
                                                          Ended         Ended
                                                     June 29, 1996   June 28, 1997
                                                     -------------   -------------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>

Weighted average common shares during the period       8,346,051      8,346,051

Common shares issuable on exercise of stock options        -    (1)       -    (1)
                                                       ---------      ---------
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
outstanding                                            8,346,051      8,346,051
                                                       =========      =========
</TABLE>

(1)  Common stock options were not included since the exercise of which would 
     have had an antidilutive effect on the net loss per share.





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Six Months      Six Months
                                                         Ended           Ended
                                                     June 29, 1996   June 28, 1997
                                                     -------------   -------------
<S>                                                   <C>            <C>

Weighted average common shares during the period       8,346,051      8,346,051

Common shares issuable on exercise of stock options        -    (1)       -    (1)
                                                       ---------      ---------
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
outstanding                                            8,346,051      8,346,051
                                                       =========      =========
</TABLE>


(1)  Common stock options were not included since the exercise of which would 
     have had an antidilutive effect on the net loss per share.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2013 of 26 August 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 808/2013                     

# of 26 August 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 August 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 16.1

October 10, 2001

Neff & Ricci LLP

Securities and Exchange Commission
Mail Stop 0304
450 5th Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20549

Dear Sirs/Madams:

We were previously the independent accountants for Advanced Engine Technologies,
Inc. and on September 20, 2000, we reported on the financial statements of
Advanced Engine Technologies, Inc. as of June 30, 2000 and for the two years
then ended.

Except for the last sentence of the first paragraph of Item 8, "Previous
Independent Auditors," we have read and agree with the comments in Item 8,
"Previous Independent Auditors," of the Form 10-KSB of Advanced Engine
Technologies, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2001. We have no basis for
agreeing or disagreeing with the last sentence of the first paragraph of Item 8,
"Previous Independent Auditors."

Sincerely,



/s/ Neff & Ricci LLP
Neff & Ricci LLP
                                      -53-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS ENDED JUNE 28,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                             155
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,453
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     30,668
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,652
<PP&E>                                          15,766
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,956)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,121
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,064
<SALES>                                        151,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,505
<CGS>                                           97,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,135)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       606
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,741)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,741)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**IN RE: PETITION TO EMPANEL**

**SECOND INDICTING GRAND JURY**

**PETITION OF: HON. PAUL M. YATRON,**

**PRESIDENT JUDGE OF BERKS**

**COUNTY :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 59 MM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 30th day of April, 2015, the Petition to Empa nel Second Indicting** 

**Grand Jury is** GRANTED

**. See**  **Pa.R.Crim.P. 556, Comment and Historical Notes.**
# L_2015193DE.01016601.xml

| 21.7.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 193/166 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 193/166

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 575/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 26. Juni 2013 über Aufsichtsanforderungen an Kreditinstitute und Wertpapierfirmen und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 646/2012

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 176 vom 27. Juni 2013
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 176 vom 27. Juni 2013

Auf Seite 290, Artikel 513 Absatz 1 Buchstabe c:

anstatt:

| „c) | welche Wechselwirkungen es zwischen international vereinbarten Standards für systemrelevante Institute und dieser Verordnung und der Richtlinie [vom Amt für Veröffentlichungen einzufügen] gibt; sie wird gegebenenfalls neue Vorschriften vorschlagen, in denen diese international vereinbarten Standards berücksichtigt werden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„c)

welche Wechselwirkungen es zwischen international vereinbarten Standards für systemrelevante Institute und dieser Verordnung und der Richtlinie [vom Amt für Veröffentlichungen einzufügen] gibt; sie wird gegebenenfalls neue Vorschriften vorschlagen, in denen diese international vereinbarten Standards berücksichtigt werden.“

muss es heißen:

| „c) | welche Wechselwirkungen es zwischen international vereinbarten Standards für systemrelevante Institute und dieser Verordnung und der Richtlinie 2013/36/EU gibt; sie wird gegebenenfalls neue Vorschriften vorschlagen, in denen diese international vereinbarten Standards berücksichtigt werden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„c)

welche Wechselwirkungen es zwischen international vereinbarten Standards für systemrelevante Institute und dieser Verordnung und der Richtlinie 2013/36/EU gibt; sie wird gegebenenfalls neue Vorschriften vorschlagen, in denen diese international vereinbarten Standards berücksichtigt werden.“

---
STATE v. Ryan Gabriel GARCELL.

No. 465A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 28, 2007.

Thomas Maher, Chapel Hill, for Ryan Gabriel Garcell.

Charlie C. Walker, Asheville, William Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of March 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 30th day of April 2007 to serve his/her proposed record upon the district attorney. The parties shall then proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12. By order of the Court in conference this the 28th day of March 2007."
STATE v. FLORES-CHAVEZ.

No. COA05-1222.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Catawba (03CRS56600, 03CRS56601)

Case without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 481/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 481/2013 of 24 May 2013 adapting Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2012 as regards the number            of samples to be taken and analysed by Croatia for the pesticide/product combinations (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 481/2013                     

# of 24 May 2013

# adapting Implementing Regulation (EU) No 788/2012 as regards the number of samples to be taken and analysed by Croatia for                        the pesticide/product combinations                     

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 400/2014 of 22 April 2014 concerning a coordinated multiannual control programme                                 of the Union for 2015, 2016 and 2017 to ensure compliance with maximum residue levels of pesticides and to assess the consumer                                 exposure to pesticide residues in and on food of plant and animal origin Text with EEA relevance.
IN RE S.B.

No. COA07-197.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Orange (02J5).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE O F 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 20 22-2 715 LT Case No. 2 019

- 306204 -CFDB

_____________________________ D IONYSIUS G IOVANNI N ICOLS , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. Dawn D. Nichols, Judge. J. Raf a el Rodriguez, of Law Offices of J. Rafael Rodriguez, Miami, for Appellant. Ashley M oody, Attorney General, Talla hassee, and Bo nnie Jean Pa rrish, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Be ach, for Appellee. Ma y 7 , 2024
P ER C URIAM
. A FFIRMED . E DWARDS , C.J., and H ARRIS and K ILBANE , J J., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      11,180,700               4,775,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  324,400                 117,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,000                  60,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,014,900              15,136,700
<PP&E>                                       2,858,800                 631,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 773,400                 293,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,501,800              16,016,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,787,500               1,662,600
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 16,411,500              19,355,800
<COMMON>                                        85,100                  62,100
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,782,300)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,714,300              16,016,800
<SALES>                                      1,596,000                 973,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,596,000                 973,600
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  605,400                 187,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,733,300               3,365,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,700                  23,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (11,085,800)             (2,602,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                (16,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,085,800)             (2,586,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (2,062,800)             (2,116,800)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,148,600)             (4,703,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.87)                   (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.87)                   (.64)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


[LETTER HEAD OF OFFICEMAX(R)]

                                  June 5, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

         Re: Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OfficeMax, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter
ended April 26, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies, that, to such officer's knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

       /s/  Michael Feuer
----------------------------------------
Name: Michael Feuer
Title: Chief Executive Officer

       /s/  Michael F. Killeen
----------------------------------------
Name: Michael F. Killeen
Title: Senior Executive Vice President,
       Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 23.1

Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

The
Board of Directors
Star Buffet, Inc.:

We
have issued our report dated March 31, 2003, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Star Buffet, Inc. on
Form 10-K for the year ended January 27, 2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation of said report in the Registration Statements of Star Buffet, Inc. on Forms
S-8 (File No. 333-46939, effective February 26, 1998 and File No. 333-50767, effective April 23, 1998).

/s/
GRANT THORNTON LLP

Salt
Lake City, Utah
March 31, 2003

---

QuickLinks
# Commission Implementing Decision of 12 March 2014 concerning certain protective measures relating to African swine fever in            Poland (notified under document C(2014) 1657) (Only the Polish text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/134/EU)            (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 12 March 2014

# concerning certain protective measures relating to African swine fever in Poland

# (notified under document C(2014) 1657)

# (Only the Polish text is authentic)

# (Text with EEA relevance)

# (2014/134/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by 2014/178/EU: Commission Implementing Decision of 27 March 2014 concerning animal health control measures relating to African                                 swine fever in certain Member States (notified under document C(2014) 1979) Text with EEA relevance.
STATE of North Carolina v. Williams Earl GOINS.

No. 112P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

William Earl Goins, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Susan Doyle, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 28th day of February 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Lee County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."