alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Initial Review Group, Pediatrics Subcommittee.                    

*Date:*                         October 18-19, 2005.                    

*Time:*                         October 18, 2005, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Holiday In Select Bethesda, 8120 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rita Anand, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Division of Scientific Review, National Institute of Child Health, and Human Development, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, MSC 7510, 6100 Building, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 10892, (301) 496-1487,                         *anandr@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

Dated: August 18, 2005.

Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.

Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 05-17010 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION


                           Of Chief Financial Officer


I, Alvin A. Hirsch, the Chief Financial Officer of Mile Marker International,
Inc. (the "Company"), have executed this certification in connection with the
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report").

The undersigned hereby certifies that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 19th
day of November, 2003.


/s/ Alvin A. Hirsch
-------------------
Alvin A. Hirsch
Chief Financial Officer


                                       20
STATE v. HARDY.

No. COA07-587.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from Wilkes (04CRS54959).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 131 (Monday, July 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41190]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14643]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, August 9, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(718) 834-2203.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be held Tuesday, August 9, 2022, 
at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments 
or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Robert Rosalia. For more information, please contact Robert 
Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 834-2203, or write TAP Office, 2 
Metrotech Center, 100 Myrtle Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11201 or contact us 
at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include 
various IRS issues.

    Dated: July 5, 2022.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2022-14643 Filed 7-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Greg King, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 195]

from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (Donald J. Mark, J.), entered November 21, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of sodomy in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of sodomy in the first degree (Penal Law former § 130.50 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see generally People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The conflicting testimony of defendant and the victim merely presented an issue of credibility for the jury, and we note that the victim’s testimony was corroborated by physical evidence and a statement made by defendant to the police. We thus conclude that the jury did not fail to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded *(see generally id..).*The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Scudder, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
STATE of North Carolina v. Santiago Ibarra TORRES.

No. 619P04-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Santiago I. Torres, Pro Se.

Katherine U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition for Writ of Prohibition filed by Defendant on the 25th day of January 2007 in this matter, the following order was entered and is:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition for Writ of Prohibition filed by Defendant on the 25th day of January 2007 in this matter, the following order was entered and is:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 53 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 53

 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into a long-term 
   lease with the Government of the United States Virgin Islands to 
   provide land on the island of Saint John, Virgin Islands, for the 
           establishment of a school, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

 Mrs. Christensen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into a long-term 
   lease with the Government of the United States Virgin Islands to 
   provide land on the island of Saint John, Virgin Islands, for the 
           establishment of a school, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Virgin Islands National Park School 
Lease Act''.

SEC. 2. LONG-TERM LEASE, VIRGIN ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, SAINT JOHN, 
              VIRGIN ISLANDS.

    (a) Lease Authorized.--The Secretary of the Interior may lease to 
the Government of the United States Virgin Islands a parcel of real 
property, including any improvements thereon, located within the 
boundaries of Virgin Islands National Park on the island of Saint John, 
Virgin Islands, as depicted on the map entitled ``______'', numbered 
_______, and dated ____ 2007, for the purpose of providing a suitable 
location for the establishment of a school by the Government of the 
United States Virgin Islands on the island.
    (b) Term of Lease.--The lease authorized by subsection (a) may not 
exceed a term of 99 years.
    (c) Availability of Map.--The map referred to in subsection (a) 
shall be on file and available for public inspection in the appropriate 
offices of the National Park Service.
    (d) Additional Terms and Conditions.--The Secretary may require 
such additional terms and conditions in connection with the lease under 
this section as the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the 
interests of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Michael B.T., Appellant, v Laurie T., Now Known as Laurie J., Respondent. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of Autumn T., an Infant. Laurie T., Now Known as Laurie J., et al., Respondents; Michael B.T., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

[799 NYS2d 420]

In related proceedings for visitation pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 and for adoption pursuant to Domestic Relations Law article 7, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Blass, J.), entered May 14, 2004, which, after a hearing, granted the application of the mother and stepfather to dispense with the necessity of the father’s consent to the adoption and dismissed his petition for visitation.

Ordered that on the court’s own motion, so much of the notice of appeal as purports to appeal as of right from that portion of the order which, after a hearing, granted the application of the mother and stepfather to dispense with the necessity of the father’s consent to the adoption is treated as an application for leave to appeal from that portion of the order, and leave to appeal is granted *(see*Family Ct Act § 1112); and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs and disbursements.

The Family Court’s findings are to be accorded great deference, particularly as to the credibility, character, and temperament of the parent and other witnesses *(see Matter of Marie J.,*
      *420307 AD2d 265 [2003]). We conclude that clear and convincing evidence supports the Family Court’s finding that the father abandoned the subject child within the meaning of Domestic Relations Law § 111 (2) (a), so that his consent to her adoption was not required.

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,461
<SECURITIES>                                    11,877
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                       669
<INVENTORY>                                        258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,073
<PP&E>                                           5,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,680
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,550
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,243
<SALES>                                         18,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,043
<CGS>                                            1,950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (961)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       715
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,676)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,676)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.13)


</TABLE>
IN RE W.D.M.

No. COA06-1537.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Henderson (99J15, 99J16, 03J132, 03J157).

Case reported without published opinion Affirmed.
STATE v. Jeremy Dushane MURRELL.

No. 484A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 22, 2007.

Benjamin Dowling-Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Jeremy Dushane Murrell.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Amy Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of August 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Jeremy Dushane Murrell) shall have up to and including the 19th day of September 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of August 2007."
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                       InKine Pharmaceutical Company, Inc.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of InKine Pharmaceutical
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Robert F. Apple, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



Date: November 14, 2002                     /s/ Robert F. Apple
                                            -------------------
                                            Robert F. Apple
                                            Executive Vice President and
                                            Chief Financial Officer
# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 714/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 714/2013 of 25 July 2013 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001            on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism, and repealing            Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1169/2012 (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 714/2013                     

# of 25 July 2013

# implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons                        and entities with a view to combating terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1169/2012 (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 125/2014 of 10 February 2014 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001                                 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing                                 Implementing Regulation (EU) No 714/2013.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

No. 1D18-4789 

_____________________________ 

CARIN ELAINE MAXEY, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

JAMES MICHAEL DUNKEL and 

KAREN MCCLAIN DUNKEL, 

Respondents. 

_____________________________ 

Petition for Writ of Prohibition—Original Jurisdiction. 

February 8, 2019 

PER CURIAM. 

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. 

BILBREY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________ 
2 

Michael M. Naughton, Jacksonville, for Petitioner. 

No appearance for Respondents.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 1101

_____________________________
J OSHUA T. C OPES , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Jack M. Schemer , Judge

. January 10, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Joshua T. Copes, pro se
, Appellant.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
IN RE D.W.P.

COA06-295.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 7, 2006.

Certification Date November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the Cleveland (03J59).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.2

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT OF SALE

 

THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into by and between 7425 LA VISTA, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Seller”), and DFW LAKEWOOD FLATS APARTMENTS LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (“Buyer”).

 

W I T N E S S E T H:

 

WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer entered into that certain Contract of Sale dated April 7, 2016 (the “Agreement”) concerning certain real property and improvements commonly known as Lakewood Flats and located at 7425 La Vista Drive, Dallas, Texas, as more particularly described in the Agreement (the “Property”); and

 

WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer desire to amend the Agreement as set forth below.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

 

1.                                  Any capitalized term used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.

 

2.                                   Section 5.(a)(i) of the Agreement shall be amended to provide that the Investigation Period shall end at 5:00 p.m., Central Standard Time, on May 27, 2016.

 

3.                                   Except as expressly amended or modified by the provisions of this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment may be signed in counterparts and facsimile and electronic signatures shall be binding as if original.

 

[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.

 

SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby executed to be effective as of the 23rd day of May, 2016.

 

 

	
 
    	
SELLER:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
7425   LA VISTA, LLC,
    
	
 
    	
a   Texas limited liability company
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Thomas P. Kennedy
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Thomas P. Kennedy
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
President
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
BUYER:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
DFW   LAKEWOOD FLATS APARTMENTS, LLC,
    
	
 
    	
a   Wisconsin limited liability company
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
MLG   PF II Co-Investor Manager LLC,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
a   Wisconsin limited liability company,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
its   manager
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Andrew L. Teska
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Andrew   L. Teska
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Vice President
STATE v. HAWKINS.

COA06-920.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 15, 2007.

Certification Date June 4, 2007.

Appeal from Alamance (04CRS52797).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
IN RE P.L.

No. COA06-810

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from Robeson (05J141).

Cases reported without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 14, 2022

No. 04-22-00110-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.V., A CHILD

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021PA00756

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due to be filed on March 4, 2022. To date, the court 

reporter responsible for preparing the record has neither filed the record nor a notification of late 

record. This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights. 

Consequently, each extension of the deadline to file the reporter’s record must not exceed 10 

days, see TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c); cumulative extensions must not exceed 30 days, absent 

extraordinary circumstances, see id. R. 28.4(b)(2); and this appeal must be disposed of by this 

court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed, see TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. 

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, we ORDER the court 

reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court no later than March 14, 2022. Requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of March, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court