alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. BRYANT.

No. COA06-1555.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from Caldwell (03CRS3205).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Intellisync Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-K/A for the year ending July 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, DavidP. Eichler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

a)                The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b)               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 23,  2005 |       |
|--------------------------------|------------|
|                           |       |
| /s/  DAVID P. EICHLER          |       |
| **David  P. Eichler**          | ** ** |
| *Chief  Financial Officer*     | * *   |

 

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Joshua Lewis JOHNSON.

No. 433P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Lyle J. Yurko, for Johnson.

Chris Z. Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th day of September 2007 *151in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Rowan County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of October 2007."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5821 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to close loopholes in the prohibition 

on the sale or rental of sexually explicit material on military installations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 16, 2008 

Mr. BROUN of Georgia (for himself, Mr. AKIN, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. FORBES, 

Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. GOODE, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. PITTS, Mr. SALI, 

Mr. SOUDER, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. KING of 

Iowa, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. PENCE, and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to close loopholes 

in the prohibition on the sale or rental of sexually explicit 

material on military installations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Honor and 

5 Decency Act’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5821 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON SALE OR 

2 RENTAL OF SEXUALLY EXPLICIT MATERIAL 

3 ON MILITARY INSTALLATIONS. 

4 Section 2495b of title 10, United States Code, is 

5 amended— 

6 (1) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as 

7 (d) and (e), respectively; 

8 (2) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol9 lowing new subsection: 

10 ‘‘(c) ANNUAL REVIEW OF MATERIALS.—At least an11 nually, the Secretary of Defense shall review material that 

12 is not deemed to be sexually explicit to determine if such 

13 material should be deemed sexually explicit and thus pro14 hibited by this section.’’; 

15 (3) in subsection (e) (as redesignated)— 

16 (A) by amending paragraph (1) to read as 

17 follows: 

18 ‘‘(1) The term ‘sexually explicit material’ 

19 means— 

20 ‘‘(A) an audio recording, a film or video 

21 recording, or a print publication with visual de22 pictions, produced in any medium, the principal 

23 theme of which depicts or describes nudity or 

24 sexual or excretory activities in a lascivious 

25 way; or 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5821 IH

1 ‘‘(B) if the print publication is a periodical, 

2 it regularly features or gives prominence to nu3 dity or sexual or excretory activities.’’; and 

4 (B) by adding at the end the following new 

5 paragraphs: 

6 ‘‘(3) The term ‘principal theme’ means a theme 

7 that is primary in importance, influence, attraction, 

8 or degree but not necessarily dominant relative to 

9 other themes in the material. 

10 ‘‘(4) The term ‘lascivious’ means lewd or inde11 cent and intended, designed, or given to elicit a sex12 ual response. 

13 ‘‘(5) The term ‘nudity’ means human genitals, 

14 pubic area, anus, anal cleft, or any part of the fe15 male breast below a horizontal line across the top of 

16 the areola with less than an opaque covering but 

17 does not include the exposure of the cleavage of the 

18 female breast exhibited by a dress, blouse, bathing 

19 suit, or other apparel.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>    
All information is at March 31, 1999 or for the nine months
ended March 31, 1999
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           343
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           624
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         2,205
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           2,204
<LOANS>                                      131,421 
<ALLOWANCE>                                      100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               138,297
<DEPOSITS>                                    84,083 
<SHORT-TERM>                                       0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            1,504
<LONG-TERM>                                   30,872
<COMMON>                                          17
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<OTHER-SE>                                    21,821
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               138,297 
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                7,039
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                156
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  83
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               7,278
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,953
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,206
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,072
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,880
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,241
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,241
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0.78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  3.09
<LOANS-NON>                                        0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     387
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 100
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      0
<RECOVERIES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                100
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          100
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. George Wesley NELSON, II.

No. 42P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Lisa Miles, for Nelson.

Alexander M. Hightower, Assistant Attorney General, Belinda J. Foster, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 24th day of January 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of January 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Audited Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of 
Operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998 and is qualified
in its entirety to be referenced to such finanacial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         100,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  471,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,000
<INVENTORY>                                    268,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               834,400
<PP&E>                                          27,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                  27,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,368,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          389,977
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,162
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,368,302
<SALES>                                      1,466,337
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,514,108
<CGS>                                          685,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  685,669
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,080,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (277,331)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (277,331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (277,331)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Star Buffet, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-46939 and 333-50767) on Form S-8 of Star Buffet, Inc. of our report
dated April 7, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Star
Buffet, Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 31, 2000 and January 25, 1999, and
the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the 53-week period ended January 31, 2000 and the 52-week periods
ended January 25, 1999 and January 26, 1998, which report appears in the
January 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of Star Buffet, Inc.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
May 3, 2000
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

160 

CA 15-01288 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

JEFF CONIBER, DOING BUSINESS AS JEFF CONIBER 

TRUCKING, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

CENTER POINT TRANSFER STATION, INC., MATTHEW W. 

LOUGHRY AND KENNETH LOUGHRY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

THE WOLFORD LAW FIRM LLP, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL R. WOLFORD OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

PIRRELLO, PERSONTE & FEDER, ROCHESTER (STEVEN E. FEDER OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County

(Michael M. Mohun, A.J.), dated March 23, 2015. The order, among

other things, determined that defendants are liable for breach of

contract and ordered that judgment be entered in plaintiff’s favor

against defendants, jointly and severally. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Matter of Laborers Intl. Union of N. Am., Local

210, AFL-CIO v Shevlin-Manning, Inc., 147 AD2d 977).

Entered: March 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
STATE of North Carolina v. Milton E. LANCASTER.

No. 161P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Milton E. Lancaster, pro se.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Scott Thomas, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 4th day of April 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
# Council Decision of 27 October 2009 on the signing of the Framework Agreement on comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation            between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Indonesia, of the other part (2014/229/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 27 October 2009

# on the signing of the Framework Agreement on comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation between the European Community and                        its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Indonesia, of the other part                     

# (2014/229/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Articles 133 and 181 in conjunction with                           Article 300(2) thereof,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 25 November 2004, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate a Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation,                              hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, with the Republic of Indonesia.

(2)Subject to its possible conclusion at a later date, the Agreement should be signed,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

# Article 1U.K.

The signing of the Framework Agreement on comprehensive Partnership and Cooperation between the European Community and its                     Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Indonesia, of the other part, is hereby approved on behalf of the Community,                     subject to the Council Decision concerning the conclusion of the said Agreement.                  

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

# Article 2U.K.

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of                     the Community.                  

Done at Luxembourg, 27 October 2009.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Bildt
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(CONTROLLER)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of RFP Express, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, William Cubberley, Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:





|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m and 78(d); and      
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Dated:  February 12, 2004 |                                                        
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                          |                                                        
|                          | By:  /s/ William CubberleyWilliam Cubberley, Controller
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

GOJO INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BUCKEYE INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

____________________

2011-1550

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in No. 09-CV-2612, Senior Judge David D. Dowd, Jr.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

R AY L. W EBER , Renner, Kenner, Greive, Bobak, Taylor & Weber, of Akron, Ohio, argued for Plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was L AURA J. G ENTILCORE

.

J ENNIFER E. H OEKEL , Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief was R ICHARD L. B ROPHY

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , R EYNA , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Letter Agreement with Warrant Holders


 




Exhibit 10.19

Aspen Group, Inc.

224 West 30th Street, Suite 604

New York, New York 10001







April 16, 2016







Dear __________: 




We are writing to you as the holder of warrants to purchase shares of Aspen Group, Inc. (the “Company”).  In order to increase shareholders’ equity and reduce our warrant derivative liability, we are offering certain of our warrant holders a reduced exercise price if they exercise their warrants now.  I have advised you that if you and one other person exercise their warrants on the same terms,  I will convert a $300,000 convertible note (with accrued interest) into common stock at a reduced exercise price of $0.19 per share, which is above market and your conversion price. If you exercise your warrants at any time through April 22, 2015 (the “Offer End Date”), the Company will reduce the exercise price of the warrants you hold to $0.155 per share.  You may exercise your warrants by signing below and e-mailing this executed letter to my attention (e-mail address provided below) by 5:00 p.m. on the Offer End Date.  The Company must receive your good funds (the wire instructions are attached as Exhibit A) and original warrant (sent to the address above) by 5:00 p.m. on April 25, 2015.  




If you have any questions, please call me at (914) 906-9159 or e-mail me at michael.mathews@aspen.edu.  




		
	 
	Sincerely yours,


	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	 

	 
	Michael Mathews


	 
	Chief Executive Officer







I hereby agree to exercise all of my warrants as provided for above and acknowledge that In connection with my exercise, I am acquiring the shares of common stock for investment and without a view to resale in connection with a distribution.




:










By: __________________________________




      _____________________________________











 




Exhibit A




Wire Instructions


























 







Warrant Schedule:







							
	Warrant Holder

	 
	# of Warrants

	 
	Strike Price

	 
	Amount


	 
	     

	 
	 
	$0.155

	 
	$
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeremy Lamont MOORE.

No. 332P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Richard E. Jester, for Moore.

Kevin L. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of July 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of August 2007."
STATE v. Jessie A. MOORE.

No. 95P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of February 2006 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of April 2006."
STATE v. BROWN.

No. COA04-737-2.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 21, 2007.

Certification Date September 10, 2007.

Appeal from New Hanover (02CRS25841, 02CRS25843).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No prejudicial error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000930114
<NAME>                        GAYLORD
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     dollar
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         19,333
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  238,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,126,110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,067,370
<PP&E>                                         1,933,393
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,295,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,371,707
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,968,700
<BONDS>                                        251,667
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    300,000
<COMMON>                                       37,950
<OTHER-SE>                                     (186,610)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,371,707
<SALES>                                        5,573,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,573,051
<CGS>                                          4,366,294
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,366,294
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,309,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             182,889
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,303,320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,875
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,306,195)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,306,195)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.35)
        



</TABLE>