alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [OR-027-1020-PI-020H; G-05-0052]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Interior.

# ACTION:

Cancellation notice of public meeting for the Steens Mountain Advisory Council.

# SUMMARY:

                        The February 7 and 8, 2005, Steens Mountain Advisory Council Meeting, previously scheduled to be held at the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Burns District Office, 28910 Highway 20 West, Hines, Oregon 97738, has been cancelled. The original                         **Federal Register**                         notice announcing the meeting was published Tuesday, December 14, 2004, page number 74535.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Additional information concerning the SMAC may be obtained from Rhonda Karges, Management Support Specialist, Burns District Office, 28910 Highway 20 West, Hines, Oregon, 97738, (541) 573-4400 or                         *Rhonda_Karges@or.blm.gov*                         or from the following Web site:                         *http://www.or.blm.gov/​Steens.*

Dated: January 25, 2005.

Karla Bird,

Andrews Resource Area Field Manager.

[FR Doc. 05-1715 Filed 1-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-AG-P
**Exhibit 15(a)(1)(ii)**

 

 

[KPMG Letterhead]

 

 

**Independent Accountants’ Report**

 

 

The Board of DirectorsWachovia Bank National Association:

 

We have examined management s assertion, included in the accompanyingreport, that Wachovia Bank National Association (the Bank) complied with theminimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association ofAmerica’s (MBA’s) *Uniform Single AttestationProgram for Mortgage Bankers,*except for minimum servicing standardsV.4. and VI.1., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to theservicing of commercial and multifamily loans, as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2002.  Management isresponsible for the Bank’s compliance with those minimum servicing standards.Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s****assertion about the Bank’s compliancebased on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standardsestablished by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank’scompliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards specified above andperforming such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis forour opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theBank’s compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Bank has complied withthe aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year endedDecember 31*,*2002 is fairlystated, in all material respects.

 

 

**KPMG LLP**

 

 

March 10, 2003

 

----
BRITT v. MAY DAVIS GROUP, INC.

No. COA06-782.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 6, 2007.

Certification March 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Orange (05CVS1443).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. PAIGE.

No. COA06-3.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (03CRS38551, 03CRS38552, 03CRS47587).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of American
Access Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003, I, John E. Presley, President, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | 1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of American Access Technologies, Inc.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March
16, 2004



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John E. Presley                                  
|John E. Presley President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3398 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3398

   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to 
    liability under State and local requirements respecting devices.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 31, 2008

   Mr. Reid (for Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Dodd, Mr. 
    Harkin, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Bingaman, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Reed, Mrs. 
   Clinton, Mr. Obama, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Brown, and Mr. Whitehouse)) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to 
    liability under State and local requirements respecting devices.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medical Device Safety Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. LIABILITY UNDER STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS RESPECTING 
              DEVICES.

    (a) Amendment.--Section 521 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 
Act (21 U.S.C. 360k) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) No Effect on Liability Under State Law.--Nothing in this 
section shall be construed to modify or otherwise affect any action for 
damages or the liability of any person under the law of any State.''.
    (b) Effective Date; Applicability.--The amendment made by 
subsection (a) shall--
            (1) take effect as if included in the enactment of the 
        Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (Public Law 94-295); and
            (2) apply to any civil action pending or filed on or after 
        the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. PEAK.

No. COA06-360.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Buncombe (04CRS20227, 04CRS63809, 04CRS63810, 04CRS63832, 04CRS63855, 04CRS64178, 04CRS64179).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Derek Scott McQUEEN.

No. 101P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Robert W. Ewing, Winston-Salem, for McQueen.

Patricia A. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 639 S.E.2d 131.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 20th day of February 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of February 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."

*536Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 2nd day of April 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                              81,456
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       43,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (2,659)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     4,600
<PP&E>                                              47,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (3,493)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     225,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               45,012
<BONDS>                                            158,022
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                90
<OTHER-SE>                                          15,390
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       225,982
<SALES>                                            161,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   161,169
<CGS>                                              141,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      141,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    30,649
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (12,830)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (18,060)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (18,060)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       (514)
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (18,574)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (2.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (2.08)
        


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00836

- CR

Larry Wayne THOMAS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR12149W

Honorable Frank J. Castro, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED February 28, 2018.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice
#### Lawrence G. Biggio, Respondent, v Jacqueline Biggio, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 756]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Iannacci, J.), dated March 9, 2004, as denied those branches of her cross motion which were to direct the plaintiff husband to contribute to the carrying charges on the marital residence, and for an award of an interim attorney’s fee.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

“Pendente lite awards should reflect an accommodation between the reasonable needs of the moving spouse and the financial ability of the other spouse with due regard for the parties’ preseparation standard of living” *(Susskind v Susskind,*18 AD3d 536 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *Campanaro v Campanaro,*292 AD2d 330 [2002]). “An appellate court will rarely modify such an award, unless exigent circumstances exist, such as where a party is unable to meet his or her own financial obligations or justice otherwise requires” *(Susskind v Susskind, supra*at 537, quoting *Taylor v Taylor,*306 AD2d 401*920[2003]; *Najac v Najac,*12 AD3d 579 [2004]). In this case, the wife failed to demonstrate the existence of such circumstances; thus, modification of the pendente lite award is not warranted *(see Susskind v Susskind, supra; Najac v Najac, supra).*The best remedy to address perceived inequities in a pendente lite order is a speedy trial, at which the parties’ respective financial circumstances may be thoroughly explored *(see Susskind v Susskind, supra; Najac v Najac, supra).*

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the wife’s motion which was for an award of an interim attorney’s fee *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 237; *Bernstein v Bernstein,*213 AD2d 508 [1995]). H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.
# Commission Decision of 20 March 2014 on equivalences between categories of driving licences (notified under document C(2014)            1625) (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/209/EU) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Decision

# of 20 March 2014

# on equivalences between categories of driving licences

# (notified under document C(2014) 1625)

# (Text with EEA relevance)

# (2014/209/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Decision (EU) 2016/1945 of 14 October 2016 on equivalences between categories of driving licences (notified under                                 document C(2016) 6517) (Text with EEA relevance ).
ARMSTRONG v. ARMSTRONG.

No. 136P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Daniel S. Bullard, Gibsonville, for Margaret Armstrong.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of March 2007 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review Under G.S. 7A-31 of Dismissal of Petition for Writ of Supersedeas Under Rule 23":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."
IN RE G.K.

COA06-610.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 15, 2007.

Certification Date June 4, 2007.

Appeal from Sampson (94J30, 94J31, 00J23).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,704
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                       371
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          89,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,544
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,844
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,503)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,503)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,503)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. William Roger McLAMB.

No. 489P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 8, 2007.

Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 649 S.E.2d 902.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of October 2007 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of October 2007."
vive20160712_8k.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 

 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

VIVEVE MEDICAL, INC.

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY

 

WHEREAS, on May 11, 2016 the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Viveve Medical, Inc. adopted and approved the Viveve Medical, Inc. Independent Director Compensation Policy (the “Policy”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Policy included an error in the paragraph titled “Subsequent Awards”; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board has determined to adopt this Amendment No. 1 to correct the error.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the following paragraph of the Policy, which states:

 

Subsequent Awards

 

Each Independent Director shall be automatically granted an annual equity-based retainer award with a value at the time of issuance of approximately 0.035% of the outstanding Stock Options issued under the 2013 Plan (each, a “Subsequent Award”) which Subsequent Awards shall be granted following each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders and shall be granted as of the date of such annual meeting. Subsequent Awards shall be in the form of grants of Stock Options, and shall vest and become exercisable in 36 equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the month following the date of grant, subject to the Independent Director continuing in service on the Board through each such vesting date. 

 

is hereby amended to state:

 

Subsequent Awards

 

Each Independent Director shall be automatically granted an annual equity-based retainer award with a value at the time of issuance of approximately 0.035% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock on a fully diluted basis (each, a “Subsequent Award”) which Subsequent Awards shall be granted following each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders and shall be granted as of the date of such annual meeting. Subsequent Awards shall be in the form of grants of Stock Options, and shall vest and become exercisable in 36 equal monthly installments beginning on the first day of the month following the date of grant, subject to the Independent Director continuing in service on the Board through each such vesting date.

 

Except as otherwise specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Policy shall remain in full force and effect.

 

Adopted by the Board of Directors on the 11th day of July 2016.
Order entered May 31, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01656-CR

SHENEQUA LICOLE BARBER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1259385-U

ORDER

Appellant’s May 23, 2013 motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief is 

GRANTED to the extent the time to file appellant’s brief is EXTENDED to THIRTY DAYS

from the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Statement of Consolidated Income of Solutia Inc. and
Subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998, and the Statement
of Consolidated Financial Position as of December 31, 1998. Such
information is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
consolidated financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000,000
              
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              89
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      364
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7
<INVENTORY>                                        331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   991
<PP&E>                                           3,301
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              732
<BONDS>                                            597
<COMMON>                                             1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                          (8)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,765
<SALES>                                          2,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,835
<CGS>                                            2,085
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  43
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    375
<INCOME-TAX>                                       126
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                249
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       249
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.03
        
        

</TABLE>