alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3192 

AN ACT 

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to authorize the 

Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Indians of Oregon, the 

Coquille Tribe of Oregon, and the Confederated Tribes 

of the Siletz Reservation, Oregon, to obtain 99-year lease 

authority for trust land, and to authorize the Morongo 

Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians of the Morongo Reservation, California, to obtain 50-year lease authority 

for trust land. 
2 

•S 3192 ES

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LEASES OF RESTRICTED LAND. 

4 Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of Au5 gust 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), is amended in the second 

6 sentence— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘, land held in trust for the 

8 Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Indians of Oregon, 

9 land held in trust for the Coquille Tribe of Oregon, 

10 and land held in trust for the Confederated Tribes 

11 of the Siletz Reservation, Oregon’’ after ‘‘Devils 

12 Lake Sioux Reservation’’; and 

13 (2) by inserting ‘‘and except leases of land held 

14 in trust for the Morongo Band of Cahuilla Mission 

15 Indians of the Morongo Reservation, California, 

16 which may be for a term not to exceed 50 years,’’ 

17 before ‘‘and except’’. 

Passed the Senate September 26 (legislative day, 

September 17), 2008. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3192 

AN ACT 

To amend the Act of August 9, 1955, to authorize 

thority for trust land. ervation, California, to obtain 50-year lease auCahuilla Mission Indians of the Morongo Resland, and to authorize the Morongo Band of egon, to obtain 99-year lease authority for trust federated Tribes of the Siletz Reservation, Oregon, the Coquille Tribe of Oregon, and the Conthe Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Indians of Or-
MORRIS v. MORRIS.

No. COA06-1547.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (06CVD3928).

Case reported without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3369 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3369

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for relief to 
        surviving spouses and children, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2008

   Mr. Nelson of Florida (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
Menendez, and Mr. Kerry) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide for relief to 
        surviving spouses and children, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF FOR SURVIVING SPOUSES.

    (a) In General.--The second sentence of section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(2)(A)(i)) is 
amended by inserting ``(or, if married for less than 2 years at the 
time of the citizen's death, an alien who proves by a preponderance of 
the evidence that the marriage was entered into in good faith and not 
solely for the purpose of obtaining an immigration benefit)'' after 
``for at least 2 years at the time of the citizen's death''.
    (b) Applicability.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        apply to all applications and petitions relating to immediate 
        relative status under section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the 
        Immigration and Nationality Act pending on or after the date of 
        the enactment of this Act.
            (2) Transition cases.--
                    (A) In general.--In the case of an alien described 
                in subparagraph (B) who seeks immediate relative status 
                pursuant to the amendment made by subsection (a), the 
                alien shall have until the date that is 2 years after 
                the date of the enactment of this Act to file a 
                petition under section 204(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the 
                Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
                1154(a)(1)(A)(ii)), notwithstanding any other provision 
                of law.
                    (B) Aliens described.--An alien is described in 
                this subparagraph if--
                            (i) the alien's United States citizen 
                        spouse died before the date of the enactment of 
                        this Act;
                            (ii) the alien and the citizen spouse were 
                        married for less than 2 years at the time of 
                        the citizen spouse's death; and
                            (iii) the alien has not remarried.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Richard E. HOEY.

No. 234P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 29, 2007.

Richard Hoey-Bey, Pro Se.

Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of May 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of May 2007."

*428Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of May 2007 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 29th day of May 2007."
RICHARDSON v. BANK OF AMERICA.

No. 240P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 12, 2007.

John H. Culver, III, Amy Pritchard Williams, Charlotte, Walter E. Dellinger, III, Washington, DC, McGlinchey Stafford, Anthony J. Rollo, Daniel T. Plunkett, New Orleans, LA, for Bank of America, NationsCredit Financial.

John Alan Jones, G. Christopher Olson, Raleigh, for Richardson, et al.

Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Jack L. Cozort, Eileen R. Youens, Raleigh, for N.C. Chamber.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of July 2007 by Consumer Credit Industry Association for leave to file Conditional Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of July 2007."
EXHIBIT 21



                   STIRLING COOKE BROWN HOLDINGS LIMITED

                                SUBSIDIARIES



The following subsidiaries are incorporated in Bermuda.

Realm Investments Ltd.
Raydon Underwriting Management Company Limited
Realm Captive Management Company Limited
Realm Underwriting Management Ltd
Stirling Cooke Brown Insurance Brokers (Bermuda) Limited
Comp Indemnity Reinsurance Company Limited
Realm Insurance Services Limited



The following subsidiaries are incorporated in the United Kingdom:

Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings (UK) Limited
Stirling Cooke Brown Insurance Brokers Limited
Stirling Cooke Brown Reinsurance Brokers Limited



The following subsidiaries are incorporated in the United States:

Stirling Cooke North American Holdings Ltd., a Delaware corporation
Stirling Cooke Insurance Services Inc., a Florida corporation
Stirling Cooke (Texas) Inc., a Texas corporation
Stirling Cooke Risk Management Services, Inc., a Florida corporation
Stirling Cooke Brown North American Reinsurance Intermediaries, Inc.,
   a New York corporation
Employers and Providers Resource Group Inc., a Delaware corporation
North American Risk Inc., a Texas corporation
Realm National Insurance Company, a New York Insurance corporation
Stirling Cooke Southeast, Inc., an Alabama corporation
World Trade Services Inc., a New York corporation
Stirling Cooke New York Insurance Services Agency Inc., a New York corporation
STATE v. TATE.

COA06-394.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 7, 2006.

Certification Date November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the McDowell (04CRS52926, 04CRS52927).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Form of Amended Supplemental Executive Retirement



 






EXHIBIT 10.3




AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

FOR EXECUTIVES OF KOGER EQUITY, INC.

AND PARTICIPATING RELATED ENTITIES





	A.	 	The Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan For Executives of Koger Equity, Inc. and
Participating Related Entities, as amended and restated May 20, 1999, is hereby further amended as
follows:






	 	1.	 	Section 4.3 is hereby amended by adding the following at the end thereof:
	 
	 	 	 	“Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company is not required to make
deposits to a rabbi trust on behalf of any Participant who has made
a lump sum election pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.6.”
	 
	 	2.	 	Article 5 is hereby amended by adding the following provision at the end thereof:






	 	 	 	     “5.6 Lump Sum Election. Notwithstanding anything to
the contrary contained in the Plan, each Participant in pay status
in 2005 may make an election in 2005 to receive the present value of
his retirement benefit under the Plan in a lump sum within 30 days
after a Change of Control of the Company but in no event later than
December 31, 2005. A Participant who has made the election
permitted by the preceding sentence may also make an election in
2005 to receive at the same time a lump sum in cash in lieu of
medical insurance coverage. The amount of cash shall be the present
value of $10,000 per year for the remainder of the Participant’s and
his or her spouse’s lives, and $5,000 per year upon the death of
either the Participant and his or her spouse. The present value
shall be determined using the 1983 Group Annuity Mortality Table and
an interest rate selected by the Plan’s actuary based on an analysis
of Moody’s Aaa and Aa bond rates and the CitiGroup Pension Index
Curve in effect upon the Change of Control of the Company. A
Participant who is otherwise eligible to receive medical insurance
coverage under the terms of the Plan shall continue to be so
eligible if he or she does not elect the medical cash-out option
even if his or her retirement benefit were to be paid to him or her
in a lump sum pursuant to this Section 5.6.”






	B.	 	Except as amended herein, the Plan is hereby confirmed in all other respects.
	 
	C.	 	The effective date of this Amendment is June 16, 2005.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by a duly authorized
member of its Board of Directors this ___day of June, 2005.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CRT PROPERTIES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Benjamin C. Bishop, Jr.
 	 
	 	 	Benjamin C. Bishop, Jr.
WALDEN v. MORGAN.

No. 596P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

H. Brent Helms, for Biesecker Road Commercial.

Paul A. Daniels, Greensboro, for Basyooni.

The following order has been entered on the consent motion filed on the 4th day of December 2006 by Plaintiffs for Motion to Withdraw Notice of Appeal and Alternative Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 25th day of January 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
IN RE A.N.J.

No. COA06-985.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 20, 2007.

Certification Date March 12, 2007.

Appeal from New Hanover (03J483, 03J484, 03J485, 03J486).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2
                             

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                              WESTOWER CORPORATION

     The following Articles of Amendment are executed by the undersigned, a
Washington corporation:

     1.  The name of the corporation is Westower Corporation.

     2.  Effective upon filing of these Articles of Amendment with the Secretary
of State of Washington, Article 2.1 of the Articles of Incorporation of the
corporation is amended to read as follows:

          "2.1  Authorized Shares.  The total number of shares which this
                -----------------                                        
          corporation is authorized to issue is 15,000,000 shares of Common
          Stock, having a par value of $.01 per share."

     3.  The amendment was duly approved by the board of directors of the
corporation, in conjunction with the approval of a stock dividend, in accordance
with the provisions of RCW 23B.10.020(4).

     These Articles of Amendment are executed by said corporation by its duly
authorized officer.

     DATED:  May 5, 1998.

                           WESTOWER CORPORATION



                           By /s/ Calvin J. Payne
                             --------------------
                             Calvin J. Payne, Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          52,063
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,672
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,866
<PP&E>                                         168,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 273,078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,035
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,459
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   273,078
<SALES>                                         24,295
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,514
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,854
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,742
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (358)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,797)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,797)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.025)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.25)
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. ROSS.

No. COA07-404.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 6, 2007.

Certification Date November 26, 2007.

Appeal from Caldwell (02CRS9566, 02CRS9567, 02CRS9568, 02CRS9569, 02CRS9570, 02CRS9571, 02CRS9572, 02CRS9573, 02CRS9574, 02CRS9575).

Cases Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
PROMISSORY
NOTE





	Principal Amount:
USD$23,977.50	April
30, 2016



 





For
value received Nogales Resources Corp., (the
“Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of John Gong (the “Lender”) the sum of $23,977.50
lawful money of United States (the “Principal Sum”) together with interest on the Principal Sum from April 6, 2016
(“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.


 


For
the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year. Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated
and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.2% per annum calculated
monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.


 


The
Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.





The
Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.


 


 


BORROWER


Nogales
Resources Corp.


 


Per:
/s/ Lei Yang,


Lei
Yang, President, CEO, CFO
Of the N inth Ci rcuit, sitting by desig nation. * 

# U nit ed Sta tes C ou rt o f A pp eal s

For t h e Firs t C ircu it

No. 07-2159
AL AN S. NOONA N,
Pla int if f, Ap pe lla nt,

v
. STAPL ES, I

NC.,
Def endant, Appe llee.

Be fore To rr ue lla , Wa lla c e , a nd

L ipe z, Ci rc uit

Judg e s. *

Order of Court Entered: F ebruary 13, 2009

Th e pe tit ion

fo r p a ne l r e he a ri ng is g ra nte d. Ac c or din g ly , th e pa nel opi nio n is su e d A ug us t 2 1 , 2 0 0 8 , i s w i t h d r a w n , a n d t h e j u d g m e n t o f

e v e n d a t e i s v a c a t e d

. A n e w o p i n i o n i s t o i s s u e t h i s d a y.

B y the Court : /s/ Ri char d Cushing Donova n, Clerk

cc: Hon. Mor

ris E. L asker , Ms. Sarah Thor nton, Clerk, United S tates Dist rict C ourt for the District o f M a s s a c h u s e tt s , M s
. We n d y Si b b is o n , M r
. D a n ie l G e lb , M r
. Ri c h a r d G e lb , M s
. A r ie l C u d k o w ic z, Ms. Pratt, Mr. Robert Messing er, Ms. Stamenia Tz oug anatos, Ms. Ga il Gelb, Ms. J ennife r Sera fy n, & Ms. Kr ist a

Pr a tt.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 864/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 864/2013 of 6 September 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 864/2013                     

# of 6 September 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 September 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE of North Carolina v. Billy Michael SUTTON.

No. 22P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Amos Granger Tyndall, Chapel Hill, for Billy Michael Sutton.

Joyce S. Rutledge, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 18th day of January 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th day of January 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."
EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying periodic report of Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Stephen R. Saul, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification
has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 15, 2005 |  | /s/ Stephen R. Saul                  
|                      |  | Stephen R. Saul                      
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                      |  | Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated

|
|

|
|

|
|