alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Walter CLINE and William Hagler v. Mark BLACK, Robert Trobich, Marvin Henderson and J. Michael Farrell.

No. 597P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Walter Cline, Pro Se.

William Hagler, Pro Se.

J. Michael Farrell, Pro Se.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of October 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report ofOmtool, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Daniel A. Coccoluto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

| /s/ DANIEL  A. COCCOLUTO  |   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|
| Daniel A. Coccoluto       |   |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |   |   |
| March 28, 2006       |   |   |

 

----
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

DEC 8 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MARIO CARBAJAL, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 97-2393

(D.C. CR-97-13-JC)

(District of New Mexico)

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

 

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Mr. Carbajal was convicted of two counts of possession of a controlled

substance with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The
2

first count charged that on December 11, 1996, Mr. Carbajal knowingly and

intentionally possessed with intent to distribute methamphetamine. The second

count charged that on the same date he knowingly and intentionally possessed

with intent to distribute cocaine.

Mr. Carbajal appeals his conviction, seeking en banc reconsideration of our

holding in U.S. v. Richardson, 86 F.3d 1537, 1552-53 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 117

S.Ct. 588 (1996), that simultaneous possession of different controlled substances

may constitute separate offenses under section 841(a)(1). He argues that

Richardson should be overruled and that his case should be remanded with

instructions to vacate the conviction and sentence on one of the two counts. He

concedes, however, that if Richardson is not reconsidered, it controls the

resolution of his appeal. We exercise jurisdiction over this appeal under 28

U.S.C. § 1291.

"We cannot overrule the judgment of another panel of this court . . . absent

en banc reconsideration or a superseding contrary decision by the Supreme

Court." In re Smith, 10 F.3d 723, 724 (10th Cir.1993) (per curium). The request

for en banc reconsideration has been denied. The district court’s convictions are

therefore AFFIRMED. 

Entered for the Court,

Robert H. Henry

Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,781                   3,850
<SECURITIES>                                    11,418                   8,504
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,164                   4,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                       265                     265
<INVENTORY>                                        809                     997
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,241                  17,725
<PP&E>                                           1,236                   1,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                     423                     543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,009                  19,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,611                   2,469
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             7                       8
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,391                  17,248
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,009                  19,725
<SALES>                                         13,605                   3,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,605                   3,334
<CGS>                                           12,002                   3,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,002                   3,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,916                   4,052
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   190                      65
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 500                     397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,813)                 (4,210)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (63)                    (33)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4,876)                 (4,243)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,876)                 (4,243)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.73)                  (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.73)                  (0.57)<FN>

<FN>
Per share information in 1996 has been retroactively adjusted to reflect a one
for three reverse stock split that was approved in May, 1996.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING BALANCE SHEETS OF ORPHAN MEDICAL, INC. AS OF MARCH 31, 2000, AND
THE RELATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,990,593
<SECURITIES>                                    12,684,333
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,465,222
<ALLOWANCES>                                       128,000
<INVENTORY>                                        474,359
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,623,422
<PP&E>                                             760,410
<DEPRECIATION>                                     394,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,027,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,755,348
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            115
<COMMON>                                            83,477
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,188,109
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,027,701
<SALES>                                          2,742,456
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,742,456
<CGS>                                              459,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      459,353
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,306,422
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (125,474)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (897,845)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (897,845)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,109,271)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.15)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Baker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | By: | /s/CHARLES BAKERCharles Baker
Chief Financial Officer
February 16, 2006 | 
| |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134297 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134297 COA: 258148 Livingston CC: 03-013712-FH TAD SPENCER DEWULF, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 22, 2007 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0114 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2008

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 303 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 303

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 324 Main Street in Grambling, Louisiana, as the ``Coach Eddie 
                    Robinson Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 16, 2007

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
   at 324 Main Street in Grambling, Louisiana, as the ``Coach Eddie 
                    Robinson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COACH EDDIE ROBINSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 324 Main Street in Grambling, Louisiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Coach Eddie Robinson Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Coach 
Eddie Robinson Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J O N A T H A N M c A L L I S T E R , S r ., P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. P R E S T O N , L i ce nsed P ra ct i t i on er , N urse at A D C /A S P C E y m a n - M e a d o w s U n it, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 12- 16672 D. C . No . 2 : 1 0 - c v - 0 2 6 3 8 - J AT ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona J a m e s A . T e i l bor g, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d Jul y24, 2013 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , C L IF T O N , an dC A L L A H A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J ona tha n M c A l l i s t e r , S r . , a n A r i z onas t a t e pr i s one r , appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng f orf a i l ur e t o c om pl yw i th ac ourtor de rhi s 42



# FI LED AU G 05 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2 12- 16672

U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng const i tut i on alvi ol at i on s. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w f o ra n ab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n . P a g ta lu n a n v. G a la za , 2 9 1 F. 3 d6 3 9 , 6 4 0 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 2 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d istrict co u rt d idn o t ab u se it s d iscr etio n b y d ism issin g M cA ll ister’s ac ti o n w ith o u t p re

ju d ice a fterM cA ll ister f ailedto co m p ly w ith th e d istrict co u rt’s M a r c h 1 2 , 2 0 1 2 o r d e rto s h o w c au s e in atim e lym a n n e r . Se e i d. , 291 F . 3d a t642- 43 ( di s c us s i ng f

a c t or s f ordi s m i s s a l unde rF e d. R . C i v. P . 41( b) a nd a f f i rm i ng di sm i ss alw here three ou tof fi ve fa ct ors s up po rt ed i t ). B e c aus e w e a f

f i rm the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s di s m i s s a l unde rR ul e 41( b) , w e do not c o n s id e rM c A llis te r ’s c h a lle n g e s to th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s in te r lo c u to ryo r d e r s . See A l-T orkiv. Kaem

pen , 78 F . 3d 13 81 , 13 86 (9th C i r. 19 96 ). A FFI R M ED .
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DANIEL CEDILLOS, 

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-14-00180-CR

Appeal from the

346th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20130D02144)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellant’s fourth motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until July 8, 2017. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLANT’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Ruben P. Morales, Appellant’s attorney, prepare 

the Appellant’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before July 8, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 9

th day of June, 2017.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrants. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                    |         |   |   |                                                  |
|-------------------------|--------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      May 14, 2008 |    | BY:    |   | /s/ WILLIAM S. MORRIS IV                              |
|                    |    |   |   | William      S. Morris IVChief      Executive Officer |
|                    |         |   |
| Date:      May 14, 2008 |    | BY:    |   | /s/ STEVE K. STONE                                    |
|                    |    |   |   | Steve      K. StoneChief      Financial Officer       |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, DOD. 

# ACTION:

Notice; announce public meeting of the Defense Advisory Committee on Military Compensation (DACMC). 

# SUMMARY:

The Defense Advisory Committee on Military Compensation committee will provide the Secretary of Defense, through the Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness), with assistance and advice on matters pertaining to military compensation. The agenda for this meeting will be to discuss various aspects of the military pay and benefits system. Members of the Public may attend but participation in Committee discussions by the Public will not be permitted. Written submissions of data, information, and views may be sent to the Committee contact person at the address shown. Submissions should be received by close of business Monday, September 12th to allow time for distribution to the board members prior to the meeting. Persons attending are advised that the Committee is not responsible for providing access to electrical outlets. 

# DATES:

Wednesday, September 21, 2005, from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. (morning session) and 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. (afternoon session). 

# ADDRESSES:

Crystal City Hilton, 2399 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Contact Mr. Terry Mintz, Designated Federal Official, Defense Advisory Committee on Military Compensation, 2521 S. Clark Street, Arlington, VA 22202. Telephone: (703) 699-2700. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Committee examines what types of military compensation and benefits are most effective for meeting the needs of the Nation. The committee membership consist of the following members: Chairman: ADM (Ret) Donald L. Pilling. Members: Dr. John P. White; Gen (Ret) Lester L. Lyles; Mr. Frederic W. Cook; Dr. Walter Oi; Dr. Martin Anderson; and Mr. Joseph E. Jannotta. 

Dated: August 22, 2005. 

Jeannette Owings-Ballard, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 05-17007 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
ALCHEM, INC. v. N.C. DEPT. OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

No. COA06-1458.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (05CVS12073).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# L_2013125EN.01001301.xml

| 7.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 125/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 125/13

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 416/2013

of 6 May 2013

entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Moules de bouchot (TSG))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Moules de bouchot’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Moules de bouchot’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 May 2013.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 1.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 239, 9.8.2012, p. 13.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.7.   Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom

FRANCE

Moules de bouchot (TSG)

---