alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                     THE TRAVELERS LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY

                                                                   Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Travelers Life and
Annuity Company (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), George C. Kokulis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Glenn D. Lammey, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

/s/ George C. Kokulis
-------------------------------------
George C. Kokulis
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2004

/s/ Glenn D. Lammey
-------------------------------------
Glenn D. Lammey
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2004

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       22
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Minco Mining & Metals Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                      
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date:

June 29, 2007







/s/ Matthew Kavanagh

Matthew Kavanagh

Chief Financial Officer
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 474/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 474/2013 of 7 May 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications (Salmerino del Trentino (PGI))         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 474/2013                     

# of 7 May 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Salmerino del                        Trentino (PGI))                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006                              of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs(2).

(2)Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Salmerino del Trentino’                              was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name                              should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.7.****Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom**U.K.

#### ITALYU.K.

Salmerino del Trentino (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.                           

3

OJ C 239, 9.8.2012, p. 9.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                   ------------


                                  CERTIFICATION

          CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) AND SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the report of Compton Petroleum  Corporation (the "Company")
on the Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  the  best  of my
knowledge:

1.       The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


DATED this 31st day of March, 2008.


/s/ Ernie G. Sapieha
------------------------------------
Ernie G. Sapieha
President & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer),
Compton Petroleum Corporation
**CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Stanley J. Talbi, Chief Financial Officer of MetLife Life and Annuity Company ofConnecticut, certify that:     1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MetLife Life and Annuity Company ofConnecticut;     2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5.      The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:August 11, 2006         /s/Stanley J. Talbi  Stanley J. Talbi   *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer*
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Star Buffet, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended January 27, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:



|April 28, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/ROBERT E. WHEATONRobert E. Wheaton Chief Executive Officer and President
(principal executive officer)
|-------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|April 28, 2003 |  | By: |  | /s/RONALD E. DOWDYRonald E. Dowdy Group Controller, Treasurer and Secretary
(principal accounting officer)
|-------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Joseph T. WALSH, Petitioner v. TOWN OF WRIGHTSVILLE BEACH BOARD OF ALDERMAN ACTING AS A BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT; Charles W. Smith, III and wife, Constance C. Smith, Respondents.

No. 467A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2007.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 179 N.C.App. ___, 632 S.E.2d 271 (2006), dismissing petitioner's appeal from an order entered on 29 August 2005 by Judge Benjamin G. Alford in Superior Court, New Hanover County. Heard in the Supreme Court 9 January 2007.

*225Carolina Legal Counsel, by J. Wesley Casteen, Charlotte, for petitioner-appellant.

Wessell & Rainey, by John C. Wessell, III, Charlotte, for respondent-appellee Town of Wrightsville Beach Board of Aldermen; and Murchison, Taylor & Gibson, PLLC, by Michael Murchison, Charlotte, for respondent-appellees Charles W. and Constance C. Smith.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and remanded to that court for reconsideration in light of our decision in *State v. Hart,* 361 N.C. ____, 644 S.E.2d 201, 2007 WL 1297237 (2007).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
IN RE J.Z.S.

No. COA06-1462.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Wilkes (06J24).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
STATE v. JONES.

No. COA06-775.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 6, 2007.

Certification March 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Cumberland (02CRS67288).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 of Docent, Inc. (the Company) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, R. Andrew Eckert, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    R. ANDREW ECKERTR. Andrew Eckert President and Chief Executive
Officer Date: March 16, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Docent, Inc. and will be retained by Docent, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 10.20


 


MINUTES OF SETTLEMENT


 


BETWEEN:


 


Thiago Caires


 


(hereinafter “Thiago”)


 


-and-


 


Bionik Laboratories Inc. and Bionik Laboratories
Corp.


 


(hereinafter “Bionik”)


 


 


 


WHEREAS Thiago’s
employment with Bionik has been terminated:


 


NOW THEREFORE,
the parties agree to resolve this matter on the following terms;


 


		1.	Thiago’s salary
will continue for twelve (12) months from the date of execution of this agreement, less monies paid, if any, and less statutory
deductions. There is no obligation to mitigate.
	 	 	 



		2.	Bionik will pay $11,300.00
($10,000.00 plus HST) towards Thiago’s legal fees.
	 	 	 



		3.	The parties hereto agree
that the terms of this agreement are strictly confidential including the nature and fact of this agreement and the circumstances
leading to this agreement. The parties hereto agree that they shall not disclose the terms or the fact or the circumstances of
this agreement to any third party other than as required by law or to their legal and financial advisers as required.
	 	 	 



		4.	The parties hereto agree
to not make any disparaging comments to any third party. The parties further agree that they will “speak well” of each
other to any third party and more specifically, any comments made by a party with respect to the other party will be positive and
complimentary in tone and in content.
	 	 	 



		5.	Thiago will execute a
Final Release and Indemnity in the form attached hereto as Appendix “A”.



 


Governing Law


 


		6.	This
agreement is governed by the laws of Ontario and the Ontario Court has exclusive jurisdiction to deal with any application that
is filed.
	 	 	 



		7.	This
agreement represents the entire agreement between the parties.



 


DATED at Toronto this 23 day of June, 2016.


 


 



     


     


    

 


 


	          /s/                                                                           	    /s/ Thiago Caires                                                  
	Witness	Thiago Caires
	 	 
	 	 
	          /s/                                                                           	    /s/ Leslie Markow                                                 
	Witness	Bionik Laboratories Inc.
	 	I have authority to bind the corporation
	 	 
	 	 
	          /s/                                                                           	    /s/ Leslie Markow                                                  
	Witness	Bionik Laboratories Corp.
	 	I have authority to bind the corporation
STATE v. Joan Myrtle SHANNON.

No. 177A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 5, 2007.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

W. Clark Everett, District Attorney, for Conference of District Attorneys.

Joseph B. Cheshire, V, Bradley J. Bannon, for NCATL.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th day of September 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Defendant (Shannon) shall have up to and including the 5th day of September 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of September 2007."
Ocean HILL v. CURRITUCK BOARD OF COMM.

No. 382P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 29, 2006.

John R. Wester, Jonathan C. Krisko, Charlotte, Thomas P. Nash, IV, Elizabeth City, for Ocean Hill I Prop. Owners Asso.

Katherine F. McKenzie, Raleigh, for Currituck County Bd. of Comm.

C. Everett Thompson, II, Elizabeth City, for Ocean Hill Joint Venture et al.

Paul A. Meyer, Assistant General Counsel, for NC Asso. of County Commissioners.

Gregory F. Schwitzgebel, III, Senior Assistant General Counsel, for NC League of Municipalities.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of August 2006 by NC League of Municipalities for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of August 2006."
# Commission Implementing Decision of 28 April 2014 on the recognition of the legal and supervisory framework of Singapore as            equivalent to the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on credit rating            agencies (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/248/EU) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 28 April 2014

# on the recognition of the legal and supervisory framework of Singapore as equivalent to the requirements of Regulation (EC)                        No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on credit rating agencies                     

# (Text with EEA relevance)

# (2014/248/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1278 of 29 July 2019 repealing Implementing Decision 2014/248/EU on the recognition                                 of the legal and supervisory framework of Singapore as equivalent to the requirements of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the                                 European Parliament and of the Council on credit rating agencies (Text with EEA relevance.).
STATE of North Carolina v. Anh Viet THAI.

No. 7PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2006.

Q. Shante Martin, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for Anh Viet Thai.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 9th day of January 2006 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of December 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of January 2006 by Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of December 2006."

*689Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
STATE v. COFFIN

No. COA04-425-2

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from Durham (01CRS50252).

Cases reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded for resentencing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201*et. seq.*).                 

The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2005-22057.                 

*Date Filed:*                     August 4, 2005.                 

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     August 25, 2005.                 

*Description:*                     Application of Air Macau Company Limited, requesting a foreign air carrier permit to engage in foreign air transportation of property and mail between Macau and the United States.                

Renee V. Wright, 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 05-16910 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P