alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24.1



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


KNOW  ALL  MEN  BY  THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose signature appears
below  constitutes  and  appoints James P. McCoy, Jr. and Charles A. Little, and
each  of  them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents with full power
of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any  and  all capacities, to sign the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ClubCorp,
Inc.  for the period ended March 23, 1999, together with any amendments thereto,
and  to file the same with all exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection
therewith,  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact  and  agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do
and  perform  each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and  about  the  premises,  as  fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could  do  in  person,  hereby  ratifying  and  confirming  all  that  said
attorneys-in-fact  and  agents  or either of them, or their or his substitute or
substitutes,  may  lawfully  do  or  cause  to  be  done  by  virtue  hereof.

Pursuant  to  the  requirements  of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, this
Power of Attorney has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and
on  the  dates  indicated:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Signature                                      Title                           Date
------------------------  ------------------------------------------------  -----------
<S>                       <C>                                               <C>

/s/Robert H. Dedman, Sr.
------------------------
Robert H. Dedman, Sr.     Chairman of the Board                             May 5, 1999


/s/Robert H. Dedman, Jr.
------------------------
Robert H. Dedman, Jr.     Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
                          (Principal Executive Officer)                     May 5, 1999


/s/James M. Hinckley
------------------------
James M. Hinckley         Chief Operating Officer and Director              May 5, 1999


/s/Patricia Dedman Dietz
------------------------
Patricia Dedman Dietz     Director                                          May 5, 1999

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(CONTROLLER)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of RFP Express, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, William Cubberley, Controller of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:





|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m and 78(d); and      
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Dated:  February 11, 2004 |                                                        
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                          |                                                        
|                          | By:  /s/ William CubberleyWilliam Cubberley, Controller
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
J. B. WILLIAMS HOLDINGS, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED OCTOBER 02, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929651
<NAME>                        J.B. WILLIAMS HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                                               4,540
<SECURITIES>                                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       13,275
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           316
<INVENTORY>                                                          9,613
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    27,624
<PP&E>                                                               4,230
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       2,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      74,973
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                6,735
<BONDS>                                                             50,345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                                              0
<COMMON>                                                            10,800
<OTHER-SE>                                                           6,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        74,973
<SALES>                                                             49,756
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     49,756
<CGS>                                                               19,088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       19,088
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    26,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   4,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (405)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         (166)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  (405)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (239)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            0


</TABLE>
MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. MODULAR SOLUTIONS, INC.

No. COA06-813.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 17, 2007.

Certification Date August 6, 2007.

Appeal from Lenoir (04CVS549).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

** AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AspenTechnology, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer and ExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, to the best knowledge andbelief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 1, 2010 | **/s/ MARK E. FUSCO**                                |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | Mark E. Fusco                                        |
|                        | President and Chief Executive Officer                |
|                        | ** **                                           |
|                        | ** **                                           |
| Date: November 1, 2010 | **/s/ MARK P. SULLIVAN**                             |
|                        | Mark P. Sullivan                                     |
|                        | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
STATE v. WALKER.

No. COA06-641.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Columbus (04CRS54631).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT
4.3


 


ADDENDUM
TO THE 8% CONVERTIBLE DEBENTURE


between


ZANETT
OPPORTUNITY FUND, LTD.


and


INTEGRATED
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.


 


This
Addendum (this “Addendum”) to the 8% Convertible Debenture (as such term is defined below), entered into as of the
7th day of July, 2016 (the “Addendum Effective Date”), is by and between Zanett Opportunity Fund, Ltd. (the “Holder”)
and Integrated Environmental Technologies, Ltd. (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used herein, but not otherwise
defined herein, shall have the meanings given to such terms in the 8% Convertible Debenture issued as of August 21, 2012 (the
“Debenture”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Company promised to pay to the Holder, or its registered assigns, upon due presentation and surrender of the Debenture, on
or after August 21, 2015, the principal amount of Four Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($476,125); and


 


WHEREAS,
the Company and Holder desire to modify the aforementioned Debenture for the mutual benefit of both parties;


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


	1.	The
    modifications of the Debenture herein will be effective as of the Addendum Effective Date and will remain in effect for the
    duration of the Debenture unless further modified in writing by the parties hereto.
	 	 
	2.	The
    original Maturity Date of August 21, 2015 shall be replaced with December 31, 2017.
	 	 
	3.	The
    original Conversion Price of $0.10 per share shall be replaced with $0.07 per share.
	 	 
	4.	Other
    than as specifically modified in this Addendum, all other terms, conditions and covenants of the Debenture shall remain in
    full force and effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Addendum, effective as of the Addendum Effective Date.


 


	 	 	INTEGRATED
    ENVIRONMENTAL	 	 	 	ZANETT
    OPPORTUNITY FUND, LTD.
	 	 	TECHNOLOGIES,
    LTD.	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	/s/
    Thomas S. Gifford	 	By:	 	/s/
    Zachary E. McAdoo
	Name:	 	Thomas
    S. Gifford	 	Name:	 	Zachary
    E. McAdoo
	Title:	 	Executive
    Vice President and	 	Title:
    	 	President,
    McAdoo Capital, Inc., 
	 	 	Chief
    Financial Officer	 	 	 	Investment
    Manager to Zanett Opportunity Fund, Ltd.
**EXHIBIT  15****(a)(1)(iv)**

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE**

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

 

**First Union Commercial Mortgage Trust — CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 1997-C1, the**

**Trust**

 

**U.S. Bank, N.A., Successor to State Street Bank**

 

Asan authorized officer of CRIIMI MAE Services Limited Partnership, the SpecialServicer to the Trust under a Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May1, 1997 (the ‘Agreement’), and pursuant to the requirements of the Agreement, Ihereby certify that:

 

Areview of the performance of CRIIMI MAE Services Limited Partnership as SpecialServicer to the Trust for the period January 1 through December 31, 2004 wasconducted under my supervision; and,

 

Tothe best of my knowledge, based upon such review, CRIIMI MAE Services LimitedPartnership, as Special Servicer to the Trust has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such periodand there has been no default in the fulfillment of any such obligation.

 

 
| ** ** | **CRIIMl MAE Services Limited Partnership** |
|------------|---------------------------------------------|
|       | as  Special Servicer to the Trust           |
|       | By:                                         | CMSLP  Management Company, Inc. |
|       |                                        | Its  general partner |
|       |                                        |   |
|       |                                        |   | /s/ Amelia  T. Hoffman |   |
|       |                                        | By: | Amelia  T. Hoffman   its Vice President |
|       |                                        |   |   |
|       |                                        | Dated:  3/29/2005 |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40336 c/w No. 11-40339 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOSE LUIS VILLASANA-LUEVANOS, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:10-CR-1257-1 USDC No. 1:07-CR-1203-1
Before KING, HAYNES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis VillasanaLuevanos (Villasana) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Villasana has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 19, 2011 Lyle W. Cayce ClerkNo. 11-40336 c/w No. 11-40339

2 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the consolidated appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused f rom further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR
. R. 42.2.
SCHENKEL & SHULTZ v. FOX & ASSO.

No. 631A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 20, 2007.

David G. Redding, Charlotte, Adrianne Huffman, for Fox & Associates.

Samuel T. Reaves, Charlotte, Christi P. Cox, for Schenkel & Shultz.

Katherine Jane Allen, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Troy Chivers.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of February 2007 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Schenkel & Shultz) shall have up to and including the 2nd day of March 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 20th day of February 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 7231

CHARLES A. WILLIAMS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SGT. T. CROSSON ; C/O MCDONALD; C/O GODFREY; SUPERINTENDENT RYAN; LT. BURGE , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 5:14

- ct

- 03308

- F )

Submitted : April 24, 2017 Decided: May 3, 2017

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Charles A. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Vanessa N. Totten, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Charles A. Williams appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Williams’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Crosson , No. 5:14

- ct

- 03308

- F (E.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2016) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argum ent would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 726/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 726/2013 of 26 July 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 726/2013                     

# of 26 July 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
Certification of CEO and CFO
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Brian
Ainsworth, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Robert Allen, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of his knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. By:
    
    /s/ Brian Ainsworth
Brian Ainsworth
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2005By:
    
    /s/ Robert Allen
Robert Allen
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 68
#### Town of Mount Pleasant, Appellant, v Legion of Christ, Inc., Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 34]

*369In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant’s use of the subject property does not comply with the zoning provisions of the Town of Mount Pleasant Code, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), dated February 3, 2004, which declared, inter alia, that the defendant’s use of the subject property does comply with the zoning provisions of the Town of Mount Pleasant Code, the defendant’s use of the property is not that of a private college, and the plaintiffs interpretation of the zoning provisions of the Town of Mount Pleasant Code violates the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, and awarded the defendant legal fees in the action pursuant to 42 USC § 1988.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs, and it is declared that the defendant’s use of the subject property, in part, as a private college does not comply with the zoning provisions of the Town of Mount Pleasant Code, that the defendant’s use of the property is, in part, that of a private college requiring an application for a special permit, and that the plaintiffs interpretation of the zoning provisions of the Town of Mount Pleasant Code does not violate the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000.

The Supreme Court erred in declaring that the defendant’s use of the subject property complied with the zoning provisions of the Town of Mount Pleasant Code, as the evidence introduced at trial showed that the property is used, in part, as a private college, a use that is not permitted in the subject zoning district without a special permit.

The Supreme Court also erred in declaring that the plaintiffs interpretation of the zoning provisions of the Town of Mount Pleasant Code violated the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (42 USC § 2000cc *et seq.)*and in awarding the defendant legal fees pursuant thereto. Requiring a religious organization to go through the same special permit application process as a secular organization cannot be considered a substantial burden on the exercise of religious freedom *(see Civil Liberties for Urban Believers v City of Chicago,*342 F3d 752, 761-762 [2003], *cert denied*541 US 1096 [2004]; *cf. Cutter v Wilkinson, —*US —, 125 SCt 2113 [May 31, 2005]). S. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Lifson, JJ., concur.