alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         4310629                 4310629
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 21053454                21053454
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              34064269                34064269
<PP&E>                                         3019352                 3019352
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                40226484                40226484
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         32666762                32666762
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        107910                  107910
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  40226484                40226484
<SALES>                                       19242280                44131051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              19242280                44131051
<CGS>                                         19782453                42045925
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 19782453                42045925
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (3730822)               (3525540)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (3730822)               (3525540)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.35)                  (0.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)                  (0.33)


</TABLE>
GANT v. JACKSON.

No. 458P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

Rick Jackson, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of August 2006 by Plaintiff for "Petition for Plain Error Review N.C.G.S. 7A-28(B)(1)(2)(3)(4)":

*805"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of October 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Percell WATKINS, Jr.

No. 119A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Daniel Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Percell Watkins, Jr.

Philip Lehman, Assistant Attorney General, Joel H. Brewer, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 640 S.E.2d 409.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 9th day of March 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007." HUDSON, J., recused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999<F1>
<CASH>                                          17,537
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,146
<INVENTORY>                                     40,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,451
<PP&E>                                         103,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,084
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           152
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,743
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,489
<SALES>                                         97,577
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,577
<CGS>                                           81,783
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,323
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,057
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
<FN>
<F1>Chase Industries Inc. quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 1999.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# The Nitrate Pollution Prevention (Designation and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 2619

Agriculture, England

Water, England

# The Nitrate Pollution Prevention (Designation and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

10th October 2013

Laid before Parliament

16th October 2013

Coming into force

18th November 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.5.2015) by The Nitrate Pollution Prevention Regulations 2015 (S.I. 2015/668), regs. 1(2), **44(f)**

## F1EXPLANATORY NOTE                  

(This note is not part of the Regulations)

These Regulations amend certain provisions of the Nitrate Pollution Prevention Regulations 2008 (S.I. 2008/2349) (“the 2008 Regulations”) which relate to the measures required in the nitrate vulnerable zones in England. They also give                     statutory effect to the revised designations of nitrate vulnerable zones in England made by the Secretary of State on 1st                     October 2013. The 2008 Regulations implement in England Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (OJ No L375, 31.12.1991, p.1) (“the Nitrates Directive”).                  

Regulation 3 provides for revised designations of areas of land in England identified as nitrate vulnerable zones for the                     purposes of the Nitrates Directive.                  

Regulation 4 obliges the Environment Agency to refuse an application for a grassland derogation under regulation 13A where                     the applicant has been found in breach of derogation conditions set out in Schedule 4, and where no further possibility of                     successful appeal against conviction, or against an enforcement notice or penalty under article 10 of the Environmental Civil                     Sanctions (England) Order 2010, is available.                  

Regulations 5 and 6 make minor amendments to the 2008 Regulations. The first is in respect of the calculation of total nitrogen                     spread for horticultural crops, which may be grouped together for purposes of the relevant calculations. The second concerns                     the equipment which may be used to spread nitrogen fertiliser. Regulation 7 makes minor corrections to Table 1 of Schedule                     1 to the 2008 Regulations, and clarifies the requirements for fertiliser plans relating to both phosphate and nitrate fertilisers                     in Schedule 4 which must be met by farmers benefiting from a derogation pursuant to regulation 13A.                  

No impact assessment has been carried out in respect of these Regulations as no impact on business or the voluntary sector                     foreseen.
STATE v. BURRELL.

No. COA06-1609.

Court of appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 18, 2007.

Certification Date October 8, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (95CRS69712, 95CRS69713).

Case reported without published opinion No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          280,529
<SECURITIES>                                  2,417,415
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              2,726,631
<PP&E>                                          125,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                   76,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                2,813,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            57,953
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            331
<OTHER-SE>                                    2,615,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  2,813,880
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (392,336)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (392,336)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (392,336)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (392,336)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.13)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5664 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5664

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to update at least once every six years the plans and 
 specifications for specially adapted housing furnished to veterans by 
                             the Secretary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 31, 2008

Mr. Rodriguez introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to update at least once every six years the plans and 
 specifications for specially adapted housing furnished to veterans by 
                             the Secretary.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REGULAR UPDATE OF SPECIALLY ADAPTED HOUSING PLANS AND 
              SPECIFICATIONS FURNISHED TO VETERANS BY SECRETARY OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 2103 of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new sentence: ``The Secretary shall update 
such plans and specifications at least once every six years.''.
                                 <all>
```
DAYWALT v. NORANDAL, USA, INC.

No. COA06-1598.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 2, 2007.

Certification Date October 22, 2007.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. 155195).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC
FORM 10-Q DATED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000929649
<NAME>                   DIAMOND CABLE COMMUNICATIONS PLC
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
<CURRENCY>               POUNDS STERLING

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                 1.6464
<CASH>                                         180,326
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,391
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,141
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,637
<PP&E>                                         634,466
<DEPRECIATION>                                 132,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 793,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,434
<BONDS>                                        855,505
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,478
<OTHER-SE>                                     206,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   793,959
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,984
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (28)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 98,928
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             98,928
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    98,928
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# The Packaging (Essential Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

Statutory Instruments

# 2013 No. 2212

Environmental Protection

# The Packaging (Essential Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

2nd September 2013

Laid before Parliament

5th September 2013

Coming into force

30th September 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.10.2015) by The Packaging (Essential Requirements) Regulations 2015 (S.I. 2015/1640), reg. 1, **Sch. 6** (with reg. 3(5))
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 19, 2018

No. 04-18-00638-CR

In re John David Garcia

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On September 10, 2018, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering 

the petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the 

petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on September 19, 2018.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of September, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11-05-075-CRW, styled The State of Texas v. John David Garcia, pending 

in the 81st Judicial District Court, Wilson County, Texas, the Honorable Russell Wilson presiding.
SCWC

- 15

- 0000012

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI  I, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

THEODORE ROBERT BRISTOW, Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 15

- 0000012; CASE NO. 3DCW

- 14

- 0001486)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pol lack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant Theodore Robert Bristow’s

application for writ of certiorari filed on August 4, 2016, is

hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, September 13 , 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-15-0000012

13-SEP-2016

08:23 AM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bobby Barfield, Jr., Appellant.

[802 NYS2d 820]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), entered May 12, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [3]). By failing to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution *(see People v Lopez,*71 NY2d 662, 665 [1988]; *People v Scott,*15 AD3d 883 [2005], *lv denied*4 NY3d 856 [2005]). In any event, we note that Supreme Court’s duty to make further inquiry is not triggered solely by the failure of defendant to recite every element of the crime to which he pleaded guilty *(see Lopez,*71 NY2d at 666 n 2; *Scott,*15 AD3d at 884). We reject the further contention of defendant that he was unlawfully arrested in his home in violation of *Payton v New York*(445 US 573 [1980]), and that the court therefore should have suppressed his statements to the police as the fruits of that unlawful arrest. The police officers had obtained a search warrant for defendant’s home and, “[s]ince the requirements for a search warrant were satisfied, there was no constitutional infirmity in the failure of the police to also secure an arrest warrant” *(People v Lee,*205 AD2d 708, 709 [1994], *lv denied*84 NY2d 828 [1994]; see *People v Battista,*197 AD2d 486, 487 [1993], *lv denied*83 NY2d 869 [1994]; *People v Tondryk,*176 AD2d 1194 [1991], *lv denied*79 NY2d 833 [1991]). Also contrary to the contention of defendant, the suppression court did not err in crediting the testimony of the police officers over that *1397of defendant and codefendant *(see generally People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761 [1977]; *People v Muldrow,*273 AD2d 814, 815 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 891 [2000]; *People v Becker,*154 AD2d 927 [1989], *lv denied*75 NY2d 767 [1989]). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

### Filings Instituting Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:*                     RP22-1047-000.                

*Applicants:*                     NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC.                

*Description:*                     § 4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates—Various Releases eff 7-1-2022 to be effective 7/1/2022.                

*Filed Date:*                     7/7/22.                

*Accession Number:*                     20220707-5105.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. ET 7/19/22.                

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

                    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (                    *https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.                

                    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.*                     For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Dated: July 8, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-15061 Filed 7-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P