alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JAMES PLACHES,

Defendant Below, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below, Appellee. § § No. 165, 2014 § § § § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware, § in and for Sussex County § Cr. ID 0912004522 § §

Submitted: September 15, 2014 Decided: September 30, 2014

O R D E R

This 30 th day of September 2014, it appears to the Court tha t, on September

15, 2014, the Clerk issued a notice to appellant to show cause why this appeal

should not be dismissed for his failure to diligent ly prosecute the appeal by not

filing his opening brief and appendix in this matte r. The appellant has failed to

respond to the notice to show cause within the requ ired ten-day period; therefore,

dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to S upreme

Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the within appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Henry duPont Ridgely
Justice
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JUAN CARLOS CRUZ, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4130

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed December 21, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Jalal Harb, Judge.

Michael Ufferman of Michael Ufferman Law 

Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Jason M. Miller, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KHOUZAM and BADALAMENTI, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR 

JUDGE, Concur.
##### Form 10-Q Table of Contents

Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eden Bioscience Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rhett
R. Atkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 14, 2004

| |  |  |                                                                        
| |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | /s/ Rhett R. AtkinsRhett R. AtkinsPresident and Chief Executive Officer

---
# Commission Implementing Decision of 13 June 2014 on the compliance of European standard EN 16281:2013 for consumer fitted            child resistant locking devices for windows and balcony doors with the general safety requirement of Directive 2001/95/EC            of the European Parliament and of the Council and publication of the reference of that standard in the Official Journal of            the European Union (Text with EEA relevance) (2014/358/EU) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 13 June 2014

# on the compliance of European standard EN 16281:2013 for consumer fitted child resistant locking devices for windows and balcony                        doors with the general safety requirement of Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and publication                        of the reference of that standard in the *Official Journal of the European Union*

# (Text with EEA relevance)

# (2014/358/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1698 of 9 October 2019 on European standards for products drafted in support of                                 Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on general product safety (Text with EEA relevance).
January 30, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DAVID H. DORSEY AND GERALDINE DORSEY, Appellants

NO. 14-14-00041-CV V.

STATE FARM LLOYDS, Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on October 14, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 10.29



|               |  |       
|-------------- |  | ------
|PURCHASE ORDER |  | 561940



To: Trumpf

3 Johnson Avenue

Farmington, Ct 06032



Ship to: Omega Metals, Inc.

6689 Shands Rd.

Keystone Heights, FL 32656



Date: 10/20/04



Date required: 2/18/05



|1 | Trumpf TC L3050 Laser per quote TCL 3050/V 04-3 except following exceptions are included:
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 1) | Prewire for material handling (Lift Master Prer-kit)
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | Tops 100 Software Pkg complete
| | -- | ------------------------------



| | 3) | Second chair for above.
| | -- | -----------------------



|                        |  |                  
|----------------------- |  | -----------------
|                        |  | Total for above  
|                        |  | + Tax            
|                        |  | + Ship 665,000.00
|                        | 
|Less 10% down (ck#7361) |  | -66,500.00       



IMPORTANT

PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL

INVOICES  PACKAGING, ETC.



PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY IF YOU ARE UNABLE

TO COMPLETE ORDER BY DATE SPECIFIED.



PLEASE SEND  COPIES OF YOUR INVOICE WITH
ORIGINAL BILL OF LADING.



PURCHASING AGENT



/s/ John E. Presley
STATE v. Andre Lamar WOODY.

No. 301P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2007.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Rick Shaffer, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of June 2007 *562by Defendant for "Petition for Plain Error Review Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-28":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of August 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>			5
<CIK>               000929540
<NAME>              SELKIRK COGEN PARTNERS,L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>		1,000
       
<S>										<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>						    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>						Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>							Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>							Mar-31-1998
<CASH>									22212
<SECURITIES>							0
<RECEIVABLES>							15622
<ALLOWANCES>							0
<INVENTORY>								5066
<CURRENT-ASSETS>						43135
<PP&E>									371285
<DEPRECIATION>							52914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>							395849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>					24513
<BONDS>									385955
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>					0
<PREFERRED>								0
<COMMON>								0
<OTHER-SE>								(28561)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>			395849
<SALES>									41409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>						41409
<CGS>									28108
<TOTAL-COSTS>							28108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>						1422
<LOSS-PROVISION>						0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>						8157
<INCOME-PRETAX>							3722
<INCOME-TAX>							0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>						3722
<DISCONTINUED>							0
<EXTRAORDINARY>							0
<CHANGES>								0
<NET-INCOME>							3722
<EPS-PRIMARY>							0
<EPS-DILUTED>							0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12.1
  (dollars in thousands)

2005


2006


2007


2008


2009Fixed charges:Interest expense, excluding floor plan interest

$
42,386


$
42,235


$
47,313


$
72,360


$
92,927Capitalized interest


2,328



3,651



2,463



1,543



702Rent expense (interest factor)


25,999



32,471



31,987



32,119



31,763Total fixed charges


70,713



78,357



81,763



106,022



125,392Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
    cumulative effect of change in accounting principle


152,643



140,998



173,584



(770,966
)


22,359Add: Fixed charges


70,713



78,357



81,763



106,022



125,392Less: Capitalized interest


(2,328
)


(3,651
)


(2,463
)


(1,543
)


(702
)Income from continuing operations before income taxes and
    cumulative effect of change in accounting principle &
    fixed charges

$
221,028


$
215,704


$
252,884


$
(666,487
)

$
147,049Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


3.1
x


2.8
x


3.1
x


(772,509
)(1)


1.2x     (1)
    
    Reflects deficiency of earnings available to cover fixed
    charges. Because of the deficiency, ratio information is not
    provided.
In the Matter of D.M. appealed by Respondent Mother.

No. 84P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, Adrienne E. Allison, for Mother.

Jennifer S. O'Connor, for Johnston County DSS.

Chad Lee, Elizabeth M. Boone, for Guardian ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (Mother) on the 7th day of February 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the orders of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (Mother) on the 7th day of February 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the District Court, Johnston County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
COUNTY MOTOR CO., INC. v. SWIGGETT.

No. COA06-1596.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Alamance (05CVS1598).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. MOORE.

No. COA07-187.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Cabarrus (06CRS5895, 06CRS7891).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
IN RE A.S.

No. COA06-1623

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Wayne (04JT220, 04JT221).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00125-CV

SANDERSON FARMS, INC. (PROCESSING DIVISION),

Appellant

v.

GERALD W. WATSON,

Appellee

From the 414th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2010-3000-5

ORDER

This appeal was referred to mediation by order dated July 23, 2015. Mediation 

was ordered to occur within 30 days. We have received an Unopposed Motion to 

Extend Time for Mandatory Mediation from appellant informing the Court that 

appellant’s attorney would be out of town until August 28, 2015 and that the next 

available dates for mediation after August 28, 2015 would be October 20, 2015 and 

October 21, 2015. Appellant’s unopposed motion is granted. Accordingly, mediation 

must occur by October 30, 2015.

PER CURIAM
Sanderson Farms, Inc. v. Watson Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed August 20, 2015
# Political and Security Committee Decision Atalanta/1/2014 (repealed)Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision Atalanta/1/2014 of 18 March 2014 on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for            the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of piracy and armed            robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) and repealing Decision Atalanta/3/2013 (2014/152/CFSP) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision Atalanta/1/2014                     

# of 18 March 2014

# on the appointment of the EU Force Commander for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention                        and repression of acts of piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) and repealing Decision Atalanta/3/2013                     

# (2014/152/CFSP) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by 2014/500/CFSP: Political and Security Committee Decision Atalanta/4/2014 of 24 July 2014 on the appointment of the EU Force                                 Commander for the European Union military operation to contribute to the deterrence, prevention and repression of acts of                                 piracy and armed robbery off the Somali coast (Atalanta) and repealing Decision Atalanta/1/2014.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3259 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3259

To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to the priority of 
                    certain high cost credit debts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2008

 Mr. Whitehouse (for himself and Mr. Durbin) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 11, United States Code, with respect to the priority of 
                    certain high cost credit debts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer Credit Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTS OF HIGH COST CREDIT ON BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS.

    (a) Definitions.--Section 101 of title 11, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (27B) as paragraph (27C); 
        and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (27A) the following:
            ``(27B) The term `high cost consumer credit transaction' 
        means an extension of credit by a `creditor' (as defined in 
        section 103 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1602(f))), 
        resulting in a consumer debt that has an applicable annual 
        percentage rate (as determined in accordance with section 
        107(a) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1606(a)), and 
        including costs and fees incurred in connection with the 
        extension of such credit) that exceeds the lesser of--
                    ``(A) the sum of 15 percent and the yield on United 
                States Treasury securities having a 30-year period of 
                maturity; or
                    ``(B) 36 percent.''.
    (b) Subordination.--Section 510 of title 11, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d)(1) For the purpose of distribution under this title, an 
allowed claim arising from a high cost consumer credit transaction 
shall be subordinated to all other claims.
    ``(2) Any lien securing a claim subordinated under paragraph (1) 
shall be transferred to the estate.''.

SEC. 3. EXCLUSION.

    Section 707(b) of title 11, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(8) Paragraph (2) shall not apply if the debtor's petition 
resulted from a high cost consumer credit transaction.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1


                                   Kroll Inc.
                                900 Third Avenue
                            New York, New York 10022


                                                     March 25, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission 450 5th Street N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Kroll Inc. has received a letter from Arthur Andersen LLP ("AA") dated March 20,
2002 in which AA represents to Kroll Inc. that the December 31, 2000 audit was
subject to AA's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in
compliance with professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity
of AA personnel working on audits, availability of national office consultation
and availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of AA to conduct the
relevant portions of the audit.

                                         KROLL INC.


                                         By: /s/ Michael A. Petrullo
                                            ----------------------------------
                                         Name:  Michael A. Petrullo
                                         Title: Acting Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. Joseph A. BELL.

No. 403P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2007.

Catherine F. Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of August 2007 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of October 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-23-1999
<CASH>                                          52,255
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,171
<INVENTORY>                                     20,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               161,295
<PP&E>                                       1,071,215
<DEPRECIATION>                                 294,141
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,152,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          200,182
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           902
<OTHER-SE>                                     415,010
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,152,987
<SALES>                                         51,610
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               181,471
<CGS>                                           48,016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,191)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       191
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,382)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,382)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS



I, Timothy G. McGrath, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Orphan Medical, Inc., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Orphan Medical, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 10, 2004



/s/ Timothy G. McGrath

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

---
STATE v. RODRIGUEZ.

No. COA07-26.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Haywood (05CRS53979).

Case reported without published opinion No error.