alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                        157,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               157,148
<CGS>                                          111,640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,754
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 8,508
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,576
<INCOME-TAX>                                       366
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,210
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (942)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,268
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-27-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-22-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-22-2000
<CASH>                                          58,589
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                       227
<INVENTORY>                                  1,312,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,517,046
<PP&E>                                         733,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                 350,263
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,239,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,008,190
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          866,800
<PREFERRED>                                     50,733
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,943
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,239,858
<SALES>                                      2,422,968
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,422,968
<CGS>                                        1,837,256
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,837,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   244
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,098
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (39,409)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (14,179)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,197)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,197)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.24)


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-31287

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

H. DONOVAN SEATON, et al.,

 Defendants,

H. DONOVAN SEATON,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1254 G

- - - - - - - - - -

May 17, 1996

Before SMITH, BENDAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant H. Donovan Seaton appeals the denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence, arguing that he

received ineffective assistance of counsel, that the court made

several errors in sentencing him, and that the prosecution

obtained his guilty plea through outrageous conduct and coercion. 

Seaton raises his substantive ineffective-assistance claims and

an assertion that an enhancement to his base offense level 
No. 95-31287

-2-

violated the Ex Post Facto Clause for the first time on appeal. 

Seaton has not shown plain error as to these claims. See

Robertson v. Plano City of Texas, 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995). 

As to Seaton’s other claims, this court AFFIRMS essentially for

the reasons cited by the magistrate judge and district court. 

United States v. Seaton, No. 91-364-”G” (E.D. La. Oct. 13, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 99(b)

ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION, successor by merger to

Household Finance Corporation ("HSBC Finance")

HOUSEHOLD FUNDING, INC. III

SAKS CREDIT CARD MASTER TRUST

_______________________________________________ 

I, Steven H. Smith, Servicing Officer of HSBC Finance (the "Successor Servicer"), DO HEREBY CERTIFY, in accordance with the Master Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 21, 1997 (as amended and supplemented) between Saks Credit Corporation, as Transferor, the Successor Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (as successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association), as Trustee, (the "Agreement") that:

1. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Annual Servicer's Certificate have their respective meanings set forth in the Agreement. 

2. As of the date hereof, HSBC Finance is the Successor Servicer under the Agreement 

3. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Annual Servicer's Certificate to the Trustee. 

4. This Annual Servicer's Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Agreement. 

5. A review of the activities of the Successor Servicer from January 1 through December 31, 2004 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. 

6. Based on such review, to the best of my knowledge, the Successor Servicer has fully performed all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such calendar year and no event which, with the giving of notice or passage of time or both, would constitute a Successor Servicer Default has occurred or is continuing except as set forth in paragraph 7 below. 

7. The following is a description of each Successor Servicer Default under the provisions of the Agreement known to me to have been made during the year ended December 31, 2004 which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such Successor Servicer Default, (ii) the action taken by the Successor Servicer, if any, to remedy each such Successor Servicer Default and (iii) the current status of each such Successor Servicer Default: 

NONE 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 1st day of March, 2005.

 

 

					HSBC Finance Corporation, as Successor Servicer

 

				        /s/ Steven H. Smith                           _________________ 
					Steven H. Smith

					Servicing Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yf i nds thi s c a s e s ui t abl e f

orde c i s i on w i thout ** o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). A K / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. BRU CE E. D U N BA R, D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 08- 30406 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 0 - c r - 0 0 0 4 5 - RSL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R obe rtS . L a s ni k, C hi e f D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r17, 2009 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , T R O T T , an dT A S H IM A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B ru c e E . D u n b arap p e a ls p r o s e f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s o r d e rd e n y in g h is

“ mo t i o n f

o rc l ar i f i c a t i o n o f

j u d g me n t . ” W e h av e j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u an tt o 2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , an dw e a f

f i rm. 

# FI LED DE C 14 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA K / Res ea r ch 08- 30406 2 D u n b arc o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt im p r o p e r lyd e le g a te dits au th o r ityto s c h e du le r e s titu tio n p ay m e n ts to th e B u r e au o f P r is o n s ( “B O P ” ) b yf

a ilin g to s p e c if yth e p r e c is e a m o u n t o f m o n e yth e B O P w a s au th o r iz e dto c o lle c t p e rm o n th a s p a rt o f th e I n m a te F in an c ia l R e s p o n s ib ilityP r o g r a m , th e r e b ya llo w in g B O P to d ic ta te th e a m o u n t o f

r e s titu tio n in m a te s a r e r e q u ir e dto p ay . T h is a r g u m e n t is f o r e c lo s e d . Se e U

ni te d States v . L e m oi ne , 54 6 F . 3d 10 42 , 10 46 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). D unbara l s o c ont e nds tha tthe gove rnm e nta c t e d vi ndi c t i ve l ybyoppos i ng h is m o tio n f

o rc lar if ic a tio n o f

ju d g m e n t. T h is a r g u m e n t la c k s m e r it. See U ni ted States v. L op ez , 47 4 F . 3d 12 08 , 12 11 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). AF F I RME D.
STATE v. DAVENPORT.

No. COA06-1092.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 4, 2007.

Certification Date September 24, 2007.

Appeal from Cleveland (05CRS5419, 05CRS5435, 05CRS54036).

Case reported without published opinion No error.
# L_2013173EN.01006501.xml

| 26.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 173/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 173/65

---

AMENDMENT OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE

THE COURT OF JUSTICE

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the sixth paragraph of Article 253 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Having regard to the second paragraph of Article 64 of the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union,

Whereas, on the accession of the Republic of Croatia, Croatian becomes an official language of the European Union and should be added to the list of languages of a case set out in the Rules of Procedure,

With the approval of the Council given on 7 June 2013,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:

Article 1

Article 36 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice of 25 September 2012
   (1) shall be replaced by the following:

‘Article 36

The language of a case shall be Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Estonian, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Hungarian, Irish, Italian, Latvian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovenian, Spanish or Swedish.’

Article 2

1.   This amendment to the Rules of Procedure shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union. It shall enter into force at the same time as the Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union.

2.   The text of the Rules of Procedure in Croatian shall be adopted after the entry into force of the Treaty referred to in the preceding paragraph.

Done at Luxembourg, 18 June 2013.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 265, 29.9.2012, p. 1.

1

---
FIRST COURT OF APPEALS 

INFORMATION SHEET BY COURT REPORTERS 

You are expected to file the reporter’s record by the original due date. See Tex. R. App. P.35. If 

a reporter determines that the due date may not be met, please advise the Clerk of the Court of 

Appeals immediately in writing, stating the reason and the due date by which the record will be 

filed. Generally speaking, for good cause shown, the Court will grant no more than two 

extensions from the original record due date, each extension not to exceed 30 days in regular 

appeals and 10 days in accelerated appeals for a total period not to exceed 60 days in regular 

appeals and 20 days in accelerated appeals. 

 

Appellate Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 

(1) Is there a Reporter's Record? Y N

(2) Are you the only court reporter involved in this appeal? Y N

If not, please provide the names and addresses of all other court

reporters below.

(3) Has the appellant requested that the reporter’s record be prepared or 

has the trial court ordered that the record be prepared?

 Y N

(4) Please select from the following options:

 A. The appellant has paid for the record.

 B. The appellant has made arrangements to pay for the record

 C. The appellant is appealing as indigent.

 D. The appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the

 record and is not appealing as indigent.

(5) Extension (fill out if extension is required for any reason other than payment)

I was unable to file the record in this appeal by ________. I expect the record 

in this appeal to be approximately _______ pages. The record covers 

_______days of testimony. I believe that I can file the record by _________. I 

ask that the court grant an extension until that time for filing the record.

Additional Comments: ___________________________________________

Court Reporter's Signature, Full Address, Email Address and Telephone Number:

_______________________________________________________________________ 

_______________________________________________________________________

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/7/2015 1:20:09 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00253-CV

Patriot Residential Management 

Services, LLC

v.

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Carlos Lazo 

d/b/a Maxwell Finish Co.

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 2

of Tarrant County (2011-001946-2-C)

May 30, 2013

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _________________________________

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3062 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3062

  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify certain provisions 
                     relating to oil shale leasing.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2008

  Mr. Allard introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to modify certain provisions 
                     relating to oil shale leasing.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oil Shale Regulatory Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. OIL SHALE LEASING.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 433 of the Department of the Interior, 
Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 
110-161; 121 Stat. 2152) is repealed.
    (b) Final Regulations.--Section 369(d)(2) of the Energy Policy Act 
of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15927(d)(2)) is amended by striking ``Not later than 
6 months'' and inserting ``Not earlier than 90 days''.
    (c) Commencement of Commercial Leasing.--Section 369(e) of the 
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15927(e)) is amended in the second 
sentence by inserting ``, not earlier than December 31, 2011,'' before 
``conduct''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3226 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3226

To rename the Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site in the 
    State of Kentucky as the ``Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National 
                           Historical Park''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 7, 2008

  Mr. Bunning introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To rename the Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site in the 
    State of Kentucky as the ``Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National 
                           Historical Park''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National 
Historical Park Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) the Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site 
        was established by Congress on July 17, 1916;
            (2) section 510 of Public Law 105-355 (16 U.S.C. 218a) 
        authorized the addition to the Historic Site of the 228-acre 
        Knob Creek Farm at which Abraham Lincoln lived between 1811 and 
        1816;
            (3) Knob Creek Farm was donated to the National Historic 
        Site in November 2001; and
            (4) the 2006 General Management Plan for the Abraham 
        Lincoln Birthplace National Historic Site recommends a change 
        in the name of the Historic Site to ``National Historical 
        Park'' to reflect the addition of a second, noncontiguous unit.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN BIRTHPLACE NATIONAL HISTORICAL 
              PARK.

    (a) Designation.--The Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historic 
Site in the State of Kentucky shall be known and designated as the 
``Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historical Park''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Abraham Lincoln 
Birthplace National Historic Site shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Abraham Lincoln Birthplace National Historical Park''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                     THE TRAVELERS LIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY

                                                                   Exhibit 99.01

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Travelers Life and Annuity
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), George C. Kokulis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Glenn D. Lammey, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ George C. Kokulis
-----------------------------
George C. Kokulis
Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2002


/s/ Glenn D. Lammey
-----------------------------
Glenn D. Lammey
Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2002


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                       17
STATE v. Bryant Lamont GWYNN.

No. 158P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 4, 2007.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Raleigh, for Gwynn.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 641 S.E.2d 719.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of April 2007 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of April 2007."
STATE v. CAPLES.

No. COA04-887-2.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007.

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Alamance (03CRS56601, 03CRS56607, 03CRS56792, 03CRS56793).

Cases reported without published opinion. Harmless error.
STATE v. Michael McIVER.

No. 377P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

William W. Polk, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th day of May 2007 by Defendant for Request for Extraordinary Relief and for Leave to File a Request for Reconsideration:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of June 2007."
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

FURNISHED PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. 1350)



I, Bernard Liautaud, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Business Objects S.A. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Business Objects S.A.



By:

/s/ Bernard LiautaudBernard Liautaud Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer