alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Council Decision of 8 July 2014 appointing two Italian members of the Committee of the Regions (2014/446/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 8 July 2014

# appointing two Italian members of the Committee of the Regions

# (2014/446/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015. On 3 June 2010, by Decision 2010/311/EU(3), Mr Roberto COTA was appointed as member until 25 January 2015.

(2)Two members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Giovanni                              CHIODI and Mr Roberto COTA,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed as members to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 25 January 2015:                  
          -  Mr Luciano D'ALFONSO, *Presidente della Regione Abruzzo*                          
          -  Mr Sergio CHIAMPARINO, *Presidente della Regione Piemonte*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 8 July 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

P. C. Padoan                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.                           

3

OJ L 140, 8.6.2010, p. 26.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 126 (Friday, July 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 39592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14105]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing an update to the identifying information 
of one person currently included on OFAC's Specially Designated 
Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). All property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of this person 
remain blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging 
in transactions with them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for applicable date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant 
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant 
Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and 
additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available 
on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On June 28, 2022, OFAC updated the entry on the SDN List for the 
following person, whose property and interests in property subject to 
U.S. jurisdiction continue to be blocked under the relevant sanctions 
authority listed below.
    LOPEZ DELGADO, Ruy, Carretera Masaya, Km 6.5, Plaza 800 Mts Sur 
Lomas Santo Domingo, Casa #6, Managua, Nicaragua; DOB 30 Jun 1949; POB 
Managua, Nicaragua; nationality Nicaragua; Gender Male; Passport 
C01850896 (Nicaragua) issued 11 May 2015 expires 11 May 2025; National 
ID No. 0013006490003J (Nicaragua) (individual) [NICARAGUA].

-to-

    DELGADO LOPEZ, Ruy, Carretera Masaya, Km 6.5, Plaza 800 Mts Sur 
Lomas Santo Domingo, Casa #6, Managua, Nicaragua; DOB 30 Jun 1949; POB 
Managua, Nicaragua; nationality Nicaragua; Gender Male; Passport 
C01850896 (Nicaragua) issued 11 May 2015 expires 11 May 2025; National 
ID No. 0013006490003J (Nicaragua) (individual) [NICARAGUA].
    Designated pursuant to section 1(a)(iii) of Executive Order 13851 
of November 27, 2018, ``Blocking Property of Certain Persons 
Contributing to the Situation in Nicaragua,'' for being an official of 
the Government of Nicaragua or having served as an official of the 
Government of Nicaragua at any time on or after January 10, 2007.

    Dated: June 28, 2022.
Andrea M. Gacki,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2022-14105 Filed 6-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### DEC 8 1998 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. MARIO CARBAJAL, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant. No. 97-2393 (D.C. CR-97-13-JC) (District of New Mexico)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before PORFILIO , KELLY , and HENRY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. Th e case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Mr. Carbajal was convicted of two counts of possess ion of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, in violation o f 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The2

first count charged that on December 11, 1996, Mr. Carbajal knowingly and intentionally possessed with intent to distribute m ethamphetamine. The second count charged that on the same date he knowingly an d intentionally possessed with intent to distribute cocaine. Mr. Carbajal appeals his conviction, seeking en ban c reconsideration of our holding in U.S. v. Richardson , 86 F.3d 1537, 1552-53 (10th Cir.) cert. denied , 117 S.Ct. 588 (1996), that simultaneous possession of d ifferent controlled substances may constitute separate offenses under section 841( a)(1). He argues that Richardson should be overruled and that his case should be re manded with instructions to vacate the conviction and sentence on one of the two counts. He concedes, however, that if Richardson is not reconsidered, it controls the resolution of his appeal. We exercise jurisdiction over this appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. "We cannot overrule the judgment of another panel o f this court . . . absent en banc reconsideration or a superseding contrary d ecision by the Supreme Court." In re Smith , 10 F.3d 723, 724 (10th Cir.1993) (per curium). T he request for en banc reconsideration has been denied. The d istrict court’s convictions are therefore AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court, Robert H. Henry Circuit Judge
Exhibit 10.2


 





Loan Agreement


 


Lender: Takung
(Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (a company registered in the People’s Republic of China, registration No.: 310141400028740)


 


Borrower: Xiaohui
Wang, Exit-Entry Permit for Travailing to and from Hong Kong and Macau No.: C25469808


 


Guarantor: Chongqing
Wintus (New Star) Enterprises Group (a company registered in the People’s Republic of China, registration No.: 500103000048186)





 


The three parties
enter into this Agreement after full consultations.





 


Article 1. The
Borrower borrowers RMB10.08 million (equivalent to US$1.5 million) from the Lender to meet the Borrower’s working capital
needs. The loan period shall commence from the date when the Lender pays the full amount to the Borrower (tentatively 15 July 2016)
and end on 31 December 2016.


 


Article 2. The
Borrower shall pay interest to the Lender at the annual interest rate of 0% based on the actual loan period.


 


Article 3. Upon
expiry of the loan period, the Borrower shall repay the principal and interest to the Lender in a lump sum. The parties can agree
in advance to shorten or extend the loan period.


 


Article 4. The
Borrower designates the following account as the loan account. The loan is deemed to have been provided once it is transferred
into the loan account by the Lender. The Borrower and the Guarantor warrant that the funds will be legally transferred and used,
and shall be solely responsible for the relevant legal liabilities.


 


Name
of account holder: Chongqing Wintus (New Star) Enterprises Group


 






     


     


    

 


Account opening
bank: Beipei Sub-branch, Chongqing Branch, China Construction Bank


 


Account
No.: 50001093600050207739


 


Article 5. The
Guarantor shall be jointly responsible for all repayment liabilities of the Lender under this Agreement, including without limitation
to the principal, interest and all costs in relation to collection of debts.


 


Article 6. This
Agreement has three original copies, each of the Lender, the Borrower and the Guarantor will keep one original copy, which shall
have equal legal effect.


 


Article 7. This
Agreement shall take effect on the date when the three parties sign thereon.


 


 


	
        Lender:

         

        Date:

         

         

         
	 
	
        Borrower:

         

        Date:

         
	
        Guarantor:

         

        Date:
EX-99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sutton
Trading Solutions, Inc. for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, I, Leigh
Bickell, Chief Financial Officer of Sutton Trading Solutions, Inc., hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

               (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
               June 30, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of section
               13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form
               10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, fairly presents,
               in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of Sutton Trading Solution, Inc.


                                       /s/ LEIGH BICKELL
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Leigh Bickell
                                       Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Avrohom Goodman, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 631]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (J. Goldberg, J.), rendered June 9, 1999, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree (three counts) and endangering the welfare of a child (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the testimony of the People’s expert on the subject of Intrafamilial Child Sex Abuse Syndrome improperly bolstered the complainants’ testimony and deprived him of due process and a fair trial is unpreserved for appellate review, as he did not object on these grounds before the trial court *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Ocean,*292 AD2d 545, 546 [2002]; *People v Naranjo,*194 AD2d 747, 748 [1993]). In any event, there is no merit to the defendant’s contention, as the testimony helped explain the complainants’ behavior after the *907abuse, which was not within the purview of the average juror *(see People v Carroll,*95 NY2d 375, 387 [2000]; *People v Taylor,*75 NY2d 277, 288 [1990]; *People v Keindl,*68 NY2d 410, 422 [1986]; *People v Hinspeter,*12 AD3d 617, 618 [2004]; *People v Brown,*7 AD3d 726, 727 [2004]; *People v Lopez,*187 AD2d 533, 534 [1992]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit *(see People v Taylor,*1 NY3d 174, 176 [2003]; *People v Tonge,*93 NY2d 838, 840 [1999]; *People v McFarlane,*18 AD3d 577 [2005]). Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Skelos, JJ., concur.
#### Rosemary Rizzuto, Respondent, v Joseph Rizzuto, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 900]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from (1) findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Spolzino, J.), entered May 25, 2004, and (2) stated portions of a judgment of the same court (Donovan, J.), dated August 26, 2004, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, awarded the plaintiff maintenance in the sum of $2,300 per month until she reaches the age of 65 and $1,000 per month thereafter, determined his interest in a certain “Additional Security Benefits Plan” to be marital property, and awarded the plaintiff an attorney’s fee in the sum of $24,700.

Ordered that the appeal from the findings of fact and conclusions of law is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as the findings of fact and conclusions of law are not separately appealable *(see Grossman v Grossman,*260 AD2d 602 [1999]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof awarding the plaintiff maintenance in the sum of $2,300 per month until she reaches the age of 65 and $1,000 a month thereafter, and substituting therefor a provision awarding her the sum of $2,000 per month until she reaches the age of 65 and $750 per month thereafter; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Although the amount and duration of maintenance is generally committed to the sound discretion of the trial court *(see Wortman v Wortman,*11 AD3d 604, 606 [2004]), under the facts of this case, we conclude that the amount of the award was excessive and should be reduced to the extent indicated.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 794/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 794/2013 of 20 August 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 794/2013                     

# of 20 August 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 August 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3241 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1717 Orange Avenue in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ‘‘CeeCee Ross 

Lyles Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 10 (legislative day, JULY 9), 2008 

Mr. MARTINEZ (for himself and Mr. NELSON of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1717 Orange Avenue in Fort Pierce, Florida, 

as the ‘‘CeeCee Ross Lyles Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CEECEE ROSS LYLES POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 1717 Orange Avenue in Fort 

6 Pierce, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘CeeCee Ross Lyles Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3241 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘CeeCee Ross Lyles 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3299 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3299

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the demonstration 
 project on adjustable rate mortgages and the demonstration project on 
                   hybrid adjustable rate mortgages.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 2008

 Mr. Ensign (for himself and Mr. Brown) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the demonstration 
 project on adjustable rate mortgages and the demonstration project on 
                   hybrid adjustable rate mortgages.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ON ADJUSTABLE RATE 
              MORTGAGES.

    Section 3707(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2008'' and inserting ``2018''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEMONSTRATION PROJECT ON HYBRID ADJUSTABLE RATE 
              MORTGAGES.

    Section 3707A(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2008'' and inserting ``2012''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Alfredo Martinez BRACAMONTES and Jose Ivan Bracamontes Cruz.

No. 47P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Jose Ivan G. Cruz, pro se.

Harriet F. Worley, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of December 2007 by Defendant *848(Cruz) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."

HUDSON, J., recused.
# Council Decision of 28 January 2014 amending Decision 1999/70/EC concerning the external auditors of the national central            banks, as regards the external auditors of the Latvijas Banka (2014/68/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 28 January 2014

# amending Decision 1999/70/EC concerning the external auditors of the national central banks, as regards the external auditors                        of the Latvijas Banka                     

# (2014/68/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Protocol (No 4) on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank                           annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular to Article                           27.1 thereof,                        

Having regard to Recommendation ECB/2013/42 of the European Central Bank of 15 November 2013 to the Council of the European                           Union on the external auditors of the Latvijas Banka(1),                        

Whereas:

(1)The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and of the national central banks of the Eurosystem are to be audited by independent                              external auditors recommended by the Governing Council of the ECB and approved by the Council of the European Union.

(2)Pursuant to Article 1 of Council Decision 2013/387/EU(2), Latvia fulfils the necessary conditions for the adoption of the euro, and the derogation in favour of Latvia referred to                              in Article 4 of the 2003 Act of Accession(3) is abrogated with effect from 1 January 2014.

(3)The Governing Council of the ECB recommended that SIA Ernst & Young Baltic be appointed as the external auditors of the Latvijas                              Banka for the financial year 2014.

(4)It is appropriate to follow the recommendation of the Governing Council of the ECB and to amend Council Decision 1999/70/EC(4) accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following paragraph is added to Article 1 of Decision 1999/70/EC:

‘18.SIA Ernst & Young Baltic are hereby approved as the external auditors of the Latvijas Banka for the financial year 2014.’.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its notification.

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision is addressed to the European Central Bank.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2014.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

G. Stournaras                            

1

OJ C 342, 22.11.2013, p. 1.                           

2

Council Decision 2013/387/EU of 9 July 2013 on the adoption by Latvia of the euro on 1 January 2014 (OJ L 195, 18.7.2013, p. 24).                           

3

OJ L 236, 23.9.2003, p. 33.                           

4

Council Decision 1999/70/EC of 25 January 1999 concerning the external auditors of the national central banks (OJ L 22, 29.1.1999, p. 69).