alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISS ; and Opinion Filed November 2, 2015. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00852

- CV

PAYSON PETROLEUM, IN C. AND MATTHEW CARL GRIFFIN , Appellants
V.
J. MICHAEL WHEELER A ND JMW BROWN #1, LLC , Appellees

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 06306



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Fillmore and Stoddart Opinion by Jus tice Fillmore
Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to dismiss. The parties have informed the

Court that they have settled their differences. Accordingly, we grant the parties’ motion and

dismiss the appeal and cross

- appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a).

140852F.P05 /Robert M. Fillmore/
ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

PAYSON PETROLEUM, INC. AND MATTHEW CARL GRIFFIN, Appellants

No. 05

- 14

- 00852

- CV V.

J. MICHAEL WHEELER AND JMW BROWN #1, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas.
Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 12

- 06306. Opinion delivered by Justice Fillmore. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Stoddart participatin g.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal and cross

- appeal are DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that the parties bear their own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 2nd day of November, 2015.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Charles A. Little, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ClubCorp, Inc. for the period ended September
4, 2001, together with any amendments thereto, and to file the same with all
exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorney-in-fact and agent or his substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, this Power of Attorney has been
signed by the following person in the capacity and on the date indicated:




Signature /s/James M. Hinckley
          ------------------------------------

          James M. Hinckley
Title:    Chief Operating Officer and Director
Date      October 16, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      13,030,534
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              107,214,315
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,663,786
<INVENTORY>                                 21,287,658
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           157,114,105
<PP&E>                                      64,862,694
<DEPRECIATION>                              26,110,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             291,697,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       95,071,887
<BONDS>                                     36,264,163
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       222,555
<OTHER-SE>                                 155,645,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               291,697,996
<SALES>                                    302,006,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           302,006,466
<CGS>                                      185,940,529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              185,940,529
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           108,379,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,298,634
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,747,207
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,046,667
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,429,410
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            617,257
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,761,035)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                    (778,041)
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,921,819)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
[796 NYS2d 267]

#### In the Matter of Stephen E. Barnes, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

June 10, 2005

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Vincent L. Scarsela, Deputy Chief Counsel, Eighth Judicial District Grievance Committee,*Buffalo, for petitioner.

*237
      *Joel L. Daniels,*Buffalo, and *Richard T Sullivan,*Buffalo, for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order of censure entered. Same Per Curiam opinion as in *Matter of Cellino*(21 AD3d 229 [2005]).

Scudder, J.P., Gorski, Smith, Pine and Hayes, JJ., concur.

Order of censure entered.
STATE of North Carolina v. Stanfield D. KEY.

No. 643P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Russell Hollers, III, Durham, for Stan Key.

K.D. Sturgis, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 636 S.E.2d 816.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of December 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
IN RE M.B.P.

No. COA06-1512.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Rutherford (04J67, 04J68, 04J69).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          44,213
<SECURITIES>                                    76,166
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,440
<PP&E>                                          42,715
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,050
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       370,111
<OTHER-SE>                                    (250,730)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   160,583
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,437
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               207,073
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (219,062)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (219,062)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (219,062)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.12)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3350 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                      Calendar No. 1072
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3350

   To provide that claims of the United States to certain documents 
 relating to Franklin Delano Roosevelt shall be treated as waived and 
                 relinquished in certain circumstances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2008

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

           September 24 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that claims of the United States to certain documents 
 relating to Franklin Delano Roosevelt shall be treated as waived and 
                 relinquished in certain circumstances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN DOCUMENTS RELATING TO 
              FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT.

    (a) In General.--If any person makes a gift of any property 
described in subsection (b) to the National Archives and Records 
Administration, then any claim of the United States to such property 
shall be treated as having been waived and relinquished on the day 
before the date of such gift.
    (b) Property Described.--Property is described in this subsection 
if such property is a part of the collection of documents, papers, and 
memorabilia relating to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, or any member of his 
family or staff, which was originally in the possession of Grace Tully 
and retained by her at the time of her death, and included in her 
estate.
                                                      Calendar No. 1072

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3350

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To provide that claims of the United States to certain documents 
 relating to Franklin Delano Roosevelt shall be treated as waived and 
                 relinquished in certain circumstances.

_______________________________________________________________________

           September 24 (legislative day, September 17), 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: APPEAL OF THE 

DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL 

DISTRICT FROM THE DECISION OF 

THE CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF 

ASSESSMENT APPEALS FOR 

PROPERTY OWNED BY MARCHWOOD 

ASSOCIATES LOCATED AT 128 

SURREY WAY, UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP, 

CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 

TAX PARCEL NO.: 33-05-00043.0300

PETITION OF: MARCHWOOD 

ASSOCIATES

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 666 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

IN RE: APPEAL OF THE 

DOWNINGTOWN AREA SCHOOL 

DISTRICT FROM THE DECISION OF 

THE CHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF 

ASSESSMENT APPEALS FOR 

PROPERTY OWNED BY MARCHWOOD 

ASSOCIATES LOCATED AT 128 

SURREY WAY, UWCHLAN TOWNSHIP, 

CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 

TAX PARCEL NO.: 33-05-0043.0300

PETITION OF: MARCHWOOD 

ASSOCIATES

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 667 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**Exhibit11**

 

**PAULAFINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**Computationof Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share**

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

 
|                                                                          |   | **Three  Months Ended  March 31** |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                          |   | **2003**                          |   | **2002** |   |
|                                                                          |   |                              |   |   |   |
| Net income                                                                    |   | $                                 | 296    |   | $ | 212 |   |
|                                                                          |   |                              |   |   |   |
| Weighted average shares outstanding for  calculating basic earnings per share |   | 6,177                             |   | 6,093 |   |
|                                                                          |   |                              |   |   |   |
| Options                                                                       |   | 165                               |   | — |   |
|                                                                          |   |                              |   |   |   |
| Total shares for calculating diluted  earnings per share                      |   | 6,342                             |   | 6,093 |   |
|                                                                          |   |                              |   |   |   |
| Basic earnings per share                                                      |   | $                                 | 0.05   |   | $ | 0.03 |   |
|                                                                          |   |                              |   |   |   |
| Diluted earnings per share                                                    |   | $                                 | 0.05   |   | $ | 0.03 |   |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying periodic report of Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Andrew Batinovich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2006 |  | /s/ Andrew Batinovich                
|                     |  | Andrew Batinovich                    
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|                     |  | Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit _____________

No. 23-10140

consolidated with

No. 23-10146

_____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Santiago Salazar-Ramirez, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC Nos. 3:22-CR-230-1, 

3:22-CR-117-1

______________________________

Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Santiago Salazar-Ramirez appeals his sentence for illegal reentry into 

the United States after being removed, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), 

(b)(1). He argues that because the indictment did not allege, and he did not 

admit as part of his guilty plea, that he sustained a qualifying conviction prior

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 21, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10140 Document: 00516903186 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/21/2023
23-10140

c/w No. 23-10146

2

to his removal, the district court erred by imposing a term of supervised 

release that exceeded one year. However, he concedes that this argument is 

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), and 

he raises this issue merely to preserve it for further review. The Government 

has moved, without opposition, for summary affirmance, or in the 

alternative, for an extension of time to file a brief on the merits. 

Because summary affirmance is appropriate, see Groendyke Transp., 

Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), the Government’s motion 

for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative 

motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the district 

court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. 

Case: 23-10140 Document: 00516903186 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/21/2023
In the Matter of N.K.B., N.F.B., J.D.B., N.M.B., and J.M.B., Minor Children appealed by Father.

No. 386P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Leslie C. Rawls, Charlotte, for Kevin Brown.

Cathy L. Moore, Assistant County Attorney, for Durham County DSS.

Wendy C. Sotolongo, Durham, for Guardian ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the joint petition filed on the 25th day of July 2006 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 310/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 310/2013 of 3 April 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 310/2013                     

# of 3 April 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 April 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 294
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        7,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     7,294
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     370,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               73,951
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               10,580
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                          65,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       370,640
<SALES>                                             15,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    15,000
<CGS>                                               15,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       15,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    26,993
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (44,993)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    100,463
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        55,500
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.01



</TABLE>