alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2013 of 18 April 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative            prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 359/2013                     

# of 18 April 2013

# amending Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 as regards representative prices in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1), and in particular Article 143 in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,                        

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 614/2009 of 7 July 2009 on the common system of trade for ovalbumin and lactalbumin(2), and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Commission Regulation (EC) No 1484/95(3) lays down detailed rules for implementing the system of additional import duties and fixes representative prices in the poultrymeat                              and egg sectors and for egg albumin.

(2)Regular monitoring of the data used to determine representative prices for poultrymeat and egg products and for egg albumin                              shows that the representative import prices for certain products should be amended to take account of variations in price                              according to origin.

(3)Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 should be amended accordingly.

(4)Given the need to ensure that this measure applies as soon as possible after the updated data have been made available, this                              Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication.

(5)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common                              Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1484/95 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### “‘ANNEX I

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 181, 14.7.2009, p. 8.                           

3

OJ L 145, 29.6.1995, p. 47.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 11, 2016. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 16

- 00240

- CV

FLEX CAPITAL TRANSPO RT, LLC. D/B/A FLEX FRAC OILFIELD AND FLEXFRAC PROPPANT SAND SUPPLI ER , LLC , Appellant s V. MUSKIE PROPPANT LLC , Appellee
On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 14

- 00869



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Lang

- Miers, an d Justice Stoddart Opinion by Justice Lang

- Miers The clerk’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated May 19, 2016, we informed
appellant s that the Dallas County District Clerk notified the Court the clerk’s record had not been
filed because appel lant s had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We
directed appellant s to provide, within ten days, verification of payment or arrangements to pay
for the clerk’s record. We cautioned appellant s that if they did not file t he requ ired
documentation we might dismiss the appeal without further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 37.3(b).
To date, appellant s have not filed the required documentation or otherwise corresponded with the
Court regarding the status of the clerk’s record.– 2

– Accord ingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 37.3(b).

160240F.P05 /Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

FLEX CAPITAL TRANSPORT, LLC. D/B/A FLEX FRAC OILFIELD AND FLEXFRAC PROPPANT SAND SUPPLIER, LLC, Appellants

No. 05

- 16

- 00240

- CV V.

MUSKIE PROPPANT LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. DC

- 14

- 00869. Opinion delivered by Justice Lang

- Miers. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Stoddart participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellee MUSKIE PROPPANT LLC rec over its costs of this appeal from appellants FLEX CAPITAL TRANSPORT, LLC. D/B/A FLEX FRAC OILFIELD AND FLEXFRAC PROPPANT SAND SUPPLIER, LLC.

Judgment entered this 11th day of August, 2016.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Eden  Bioscience Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the  period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,  Bradley S. Powell,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant  to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of  1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition  and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  July 26,
2005

| | /s/
      Bradley S. Powell                                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                       
| | Bradley
      S. Powell                                               
| | Vice
      President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

-29-

---
# L_2012349EN.01007701.xml

| 19.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 349/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 349/77

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1183/2012 of 30 November 2012 amending and correcting Regulation (EU) No 10/2011 on plastic materials and articles intended to come into contact with food

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 338 of 12 December 2012
  )

On page 14, Annex, in the table of point 5, the entry ‘858’ is replaced by the following:

| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘858 | 38565 | 0090498-90-1 | 3,9-bis[2-(3-(3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)propionyloxy)-1,1-dimethylethyl]-2,4,8,10-tetraoxaspiro[5,5]undecane | yes | no | yes | 0,05 | | SML expressed as the sum of the substance and its oxidation product 3-[(3-(3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)prop-2-enoyloxy)-1,1-dimethylethyl]-9-[(3-(3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)propionyloxy)-1,1-dimethylethyl]-2,4,8,10-tetraoxaspiro[5,5]-undecane in equilibrium with its para quinone methid tautomer. | (2)’ |

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

‘858

38565

0090498-90-1

3,9-bis[2-(3-(3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)propionyloxy)-1,1-dimethylethyl]-2,4,8,10-tetraoxaspiro[5,5]undecane

yes

no

yes

0,05

SML expressed as the sum of the substance and its oxidation product 3-[(3-(3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)prop-2-enoyloxy)-1,1-dimethylethyl]-9-[(3-(3-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)propionyloxy)-1,1-dimethylethyl]-2,4,8,10-tetraoxaspiro[5,5]-undecane in equilibrium with its para quinone methid tautomer.

(2)’

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Abdul-Jabbor Malik, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 27]

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert I. Altman, J.), rendered March 25, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3V2 to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence established that defendant reached for a knife during an altercation with the complainant, evincing the requisite intent to use it unlawfully against another.

The challenged portions of the court’s charge, including the instructions on the element of intent *(see People v Getch,*50 NY2d 456, 465 [1980]) correctly stated the law.

The record establishes that defendant received effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Taylor,*1 NY3d 174 [2003]; *People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]).

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims, including those raised in his pro se reply briefs. Concur— Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Marlow and Ellerin, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-25-1998
<CASH>                                         128,665
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,709
<INVENTORY>                                     16,415
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               218,199
<PP&E>                                         998,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                 307,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,033,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          197,691
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           902
<OTHER-SE>                                     455,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,033,691
<SALES>                                         47,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,959
<CGS>                                           44,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   837
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    197
<INCOME-TAX>                                       443
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (965)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (965)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Paul J. Kanela, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 333]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 25, 2004, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling, inter alia, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

On September 20, 2002, claimant left his job at a gift importing company after one of the employer’s principals purportedly advised all employees to collect their paychecks because the business was closing. Claimant did not contact the employer thereafter but filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits representing that his job had ended due to a lack of work. He was awarded benefits in the amount of $6,885. After extended proceedings, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal *633Board, upon reconsideration, adhered to its decision disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits on the basis that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause and charged him with a recoverable overpayment. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. Although claimant testified that he left the employer’s premises because the vice-president announced his intention to close the business on September 20, 2002, the employer’s president contradicted this testimony. He indicated that claimant was agitated and abruptly left the employer’s premises on the date in question after demanding his paycheck. He stated that no one was told to leave the company and that he fully expected claimant to report to work the following Monday, which claimant failed to do. Inasmuch as the Board could choose to credit the testimony of the employer’s representative over that of claimant *(see Matter of Kam Wing Tam [Commissioner of Labor],*16 AD3d 749, 750 [2005]), substantial evidence supports its finding that claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Given claimant’s false statement that he lost his job due to a lack of work, substantial evidence also supports the Board’s finding that he is liable for a recoverable overpayment of benefits *(see Labor Law*§ 597 [4]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Feters, Carpinello and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
ILLINOIS 

#19 #45 1.6% $742 #18 #11 #19

$9.3 B SPENT IN 1.1% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $6.9 B CONTRACT 63,715 NUMBER OF $2.4 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 2% Research an

Developme

Service: 

 and

nt: 67%

d

nt: 3%

28%

Supplies

Equipme

By Service 

Army

24%

Navy/Marines

18%

Air Force

18%

Other Defense

40%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 17%

Active Duty: 41%

National 

Guard: 21%

Civilian: 20%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

2%

19%

39%

40%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Northrop Grumman $984.0 M

W.S. Darley & Co. $604.8 M

Cardinal Health $511.7 M

BP $462.6 M

Omnicom Group Inc. (OGI) $349.4 M

Caterpillar $261.7 M

SupplyCore $235.9 M

General Dynamics $233.8 M

Woodward Inc. $223.1 M

CDW Government $198.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$7.6

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

$5.8 $5.3 $5.4

$4.3

$3.0

FY19 FY20

$6.7 $6.9

$2.4 BILLION 63,715

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Lake 20,661 1,633 220

St. Clair 4,629 4,111 1,079

Cook 367 778 2,323

Rock Island 327 4,404 368

Sangamon 63 550 2,107

Peoria 42 373 1,754

Will ND 73 154

Champaign 27 315 288

DuPage 55 119 0

Macon ND 50 368

Reserve Total

3,763 26,277

1,685 11,504

2,302 5,770

457 5,556

97 2,817

504 2,673

571 ND

88 718

494 668

244 ND

44 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

ILLINOIS 

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Cook

Lake

DuPage

St. Clair

Winnebago

Peoria

Williamson

Rock Island

McHenry

Kane

(M = millions)

$2.7 B 

$1.1 B 

$999.8 M 

$753.2 M 

$382.9 M 

$278.9 M 

$212.0 M 

$156.4 M 

$56.6 M 

$48.5 M 

St. Clair

Lake

Rock Island

Cook

Sangamon

Peoria

Champaign

DuPage

Macon

Winnebago

$767.2 M 

$593.3 M 

$404.4 M 

$188.5 M 

$115.0 M 

$87.7 M 

$36.4 M 

$30.3 M 

$18.2 M 

$15.1 M 

Kane

Lake

Cook

DuPage Rock Island

Peoria

St. Clair

Williamson

Winnebago McHenry

St. Clair

Lake

Cook

DuPage Rock Island

Winnebago

Peoria

Champaign

Sangamon Macon

45
STATE v. Iziah BARDEN.

No. 96A01-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 10, 2006.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Ellen B. Scouten, Special Deputy Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of October 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Complete Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 20th day of November 2006 to serve his/her proposed record upon the district attorney. The parties shall then proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12. By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of October 2006."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 576 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 576

 To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise the regulations under the 
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 to require that belt haulage 
    entries not be used to ventilate active working places in mines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 19, 2007

  Mr. Rahall (for himself and Mr. Mollohan) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of Labor to revise the regulations under the 
Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 to require that belt haulage 
    entries not be used to ventilate active working places in mines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Mine Ventilation Safety Act 
of 2007''.

SEC. 2. MINE VENTILATION SAFETY.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Labor shall revise the regulations prescribed pursuant 
to section 303(y) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (30 
U.S.C. 863(y)) to require, in any coal mine, regardless of the date on 
which it was opened, that belt haulage entries not be used to ventilate 
active working places.
                                 <all>
```
Michael SWIFT, Employee, Plaintiff v. RICHARDSON SPORTS, LTD. d/b/a Carolina Panthers, Employer and Legion Insurance Company (Cameron M. Harris & Company, Adjusting Service), Carriers, Defendants.

No. 598P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

R. James Lore, Raleigh, for Michael Swift.

Shannon P. Metcalf, Hatcher B. Kincheloe, Charlotte, for Richardson Sports, et al.

Prior report: 173 N.C.App. 134, 620 S.E.2d 533.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th day of October 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

TIMMONS-GOODSON, J. recused.
Exhibit 10.16

Summary of compensation for named executive officers  February 2009

In February 2009, the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors established 2009 salary and target bonus applicable to the Companys Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the other named executive officers as follows:



|                  |  |                  |         |                   |   |        
|----------------- |  | ---------------- | ------- | ----------------- | - | -------
|Named Executive   |  | 2009 Base Salary |         | 2009 Target Bonus
|Arthur G. Dauber  |  | $                | 240,000 |                   | $ | 100,000
|John H. Untereker |  | $                | 168,400 |                   | $ | 82,500 
|Neal T. Hare      |  | $                | 176,400 |                   | $ | 82,500 
|James J. Steffek  |  | $                | 176,400 |                   | $ | 82,500 
|Charles M. Dauber |  | $                | 181,875 |                   | $ | 75,000 
|Timothy C. Adams  |  | $                | 150,000 |                   | $ | 30,000 

Actual bonus amounts payable to each executive will be based on the achievement of company and
individual performance goals established for each executive. Targeted performance must be achieved at the 75% level for that component of the bonus to be earned and must be achieved at the 100% level for the full bonus to be earned. Some of each
executives individual goals may require a subjective evaluation and judgment with respect to achievement of these goals. Company performance targets range from 50% to 75% of total bonus with individual goals encompassing the remainder. After
the completion of the 2009 fiscal year, the Chief Executive Officer will review each executives performance against 2009 company and individual performance goals. Based on this assessment, the CEO will then recommend to the Compensation
Committee what percentage of each executives target bonus the executive should receive. The Compensation Committee, without the CEOs participation, will evaluate the CEOs performance (and determine his bonus) by reviewing the
CEOs success in achieving the company and personal performance goals established by the committee for 2009.

The executives are also
eligible to receive grants under the 2007 Employee Stock Incentive Plan and are eligible to receive employee benefits generally available to all employees of the Company.

John H. Untereker and Charles M. Dauber have employment agreements with the Company. The other executives are at will employees.