alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit****31.2**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I,
Richard K Brock, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Professional Lease Management
Income Fund I, L.L.C. (the Registrant).
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 
 a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 
 
 
 Date:
August 10, 2005  By:  /s/
Richard K Brock
 Richard K
Brock
 Chief
Financial Officer
 (Principal
Financial Officer)
STATE v. HARDIE.

No. COA07-1.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Craven (05CRS55787).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET (UNAUDITED) AND THE OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
(UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,838,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    478,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,435,833
<PP&E>                                         459,539
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,921
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,806,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,500,973
<BONDS>                                        500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,500,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,797
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,231,796)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,806,535
<SALES>                                          1,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,043
<CGS>                                              563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               751,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (733,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (733,351)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (733,351)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [AK964-1410-HY-P; AA-9206-A, SEA-3] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of decision. 

# SUMMARY:

As required by 43 CFR 2650.7(d), notice is hereby given that an appealable decision directing conveyance of lands pursuant to the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act will be issued to Shee Atika, Incorporated, for certain lands in T. 47 S., R. 66 E., Copper River Meridian, located in the vicinity of Sitka, Alaska, containing approximately 20 acres. Notice of the decision will also be published four times in the Ketchikan Daily News. 

# DATES:

The time limits for filing an appeal are: 

1. Any party claiming a property interest which is adversely affected by the decision shall have until September 26, 2005 to file an appeal. 

2. Parties receiving service of the decision by certified mail shall have 30 days from the date of receipt to file an appeal. 

Parties who do not file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of 43 CFR part 4, subpart E, shall be deemed to have waived their rights. 

# ADDRESSES:

A copy of the decision may be obtained from: Bureau of Land Management, Alaska State Office, 222 West Seventh Avenue, #13, Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7599. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT:

                        Eileen Ford, by phone at 907-271-5715, or by e-mail at                         *eileen_ford@ak.blm.gov*. Persons who use a telecommunication device (TTD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8330, 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to contact Ms. Ford.                     

Eileen Ford, 

Land Law Examiner, Branch of Adjudication II. 

[FR Doc. 05-16868 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-$$-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 573 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 573

To amend the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the establishment of 
   the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, and for other purposes'' to 
   clarify the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to accept 
 donations of lands that are contiguous to the Indiana Dunes National 
                   Lakeshore, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2007

Mr. Visclosky introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the establishment of 
   the Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, and for other purposes'' to 
   clarify the authority of the Secretary of the Interior to accept 
 donations of lands that are contiguous to the Indiana Dunes National 
                   Lakeshore, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore 
Corrections Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF CONTIGUOUS LANDS.

    Section 19 of such Act (16 U.S.C. 460u-19) is amended by 
designating the existing text of the section as subsection (a), and by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) For purposes of subsection (a), lands may be considered 
contiguous to other lands if the lands touch the other lands, or are 
separated from the other lands by only a public or private right-of-
way, such as a road, railroad, or utility corridor.''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORITY TO ACQUIRE LANDS BY PAYMENT OF DELINQUENT TAXES.

    Section 2(a) of such Act (16 U.S.C. 460u-1(a)) is amended in the 
first sentence by inserting before the period the following: ``, 
including acquisition from units of State or local government by 
satisfaction of delinquent State or local taxes''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3218 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3218

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
  To extend the pilot program for volunteer groups to obtain criminal 
                       history background checks.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Criminal History Background Checks 
Pilot Extension Act of 2008''.
SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF PILOT PROGRAM.
    Section 108(a)(3)(A) of the PROTECT Act (42 U.S.C. 5119a note) is 
amended by striking ``a 60-month'' and inserting ``a 66-month''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
STATE v. COWAN.

No. COA05-1394.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Bladen (04CRS53140)

Case without published opinion. No error.
CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SABRANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


EX-32.1





Certification
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350




I-Element
      Corporation, Inc.


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS


ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of IElement Corporation on Form 10-KSB for
      the
      period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange


Commission
      on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ivan Zweig, Chief Executive Officer of
      IElement Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as


adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of IElement, Inc.





Date:
      July 16, 2007





/s/
      Ivan
      Zweig


-----------------


Ivan
      Zweig


Chief
      Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

 
| Contact: |   | Robert E. Wheaton |
|----------|--------|-------------------|
|     |   | President, CEO    |
|     |   | Star Buffet, Inc. |
|     |   | (480) 425-0397    |

 

FOR IMMEDIATERELEASE:  Friday, April 28, 2006

 

STAR BUFFET, INC. FILES FORM 10-K FOR FY 2006

 

**SALTLAKE CITY, UT — April 28, 2006 — Star Buffet, Inc. (Nasdaq: STRZ) today filed aForm 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission for its fiscal yearending January 30, 2006.  Following arethe highlights:**

** **

**StarBuffet, Inc. had revenues of $56.3 million and net income of $1,797,000, or$0.56 per share on a diluted basis, for the fifty-two weeks ended January 30,2006.**

** **

**SafeHarbor Statement**

** **

**Statementsthat are not historical facts contained in this release are forward-lookingstatements that involve risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary materiallyfrom the descriptions contained herein due to many factors, including, but notlimited to, product demand and market acceptance risks, the effect of economicconditions, the impact of competitive products and pricing, the results offinancing efforts, implementation of the Company’s acquisition and strategicalliance strategy, the effect of the Company’s accounting policies and otherrisks detailed in the Company’s Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended January 30,2006, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  Copies of all of the Company’s filings withthe SEC are available to the public on the SEC’s web site athttp://www.sec.gov.  The Companyundertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.**

** **

**AboutStar Buffet**

** **

Star Buffet, through itssubsidiaries, as of April 28, 2006, operates 14 franchised HomeTown Buffetrestaurants, six JB’s restaurants, five BuddyFreddys restaurants, four K-BOB’Srestaurants, two JJ North’s Country Buffet restaurants,  two Holiday House restaurants and one CasaBonita Mexican theme restaurant.

 

E-1

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0545

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RANDY CHRISTOPHER ARCHIBALD SR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 8, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 1 2020

09/01/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0545
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00248

- CV

In re Lazy W Conservation District

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 2.8(a).

Relator ’ s Opposed Motion for Emergency Stay is also denied.

_______________________ ___________________

Darlene Byrne

, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly

Filed: June 9 , 2021
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ONIQUE WHITE, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1546

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 14, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Betancourt v. State, 804 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 2001); Williams v. 

State, 707 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 1998); Franke v. State, 997 So. 2d 424 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008); 

Carpenter v. State, 884 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Almendares v. State, 916 So. 

2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); Williams v. State, 907 So. 2d 1224 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005); 

Pruitt v. State, 801 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

SILBERMAN, VILLANTI, and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.
COMPTON v. MAYA LAKE, L.L.C.

No. COA06-860.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Alamance (05CVS172).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929454
<NAME>                        GLENBOROUGH REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S.DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         3,352
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,814
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,166
<PP&E>                                         346,287
<DEPRECIATION>                                 30,450
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 337,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,597
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       13
<OTHER-SE>                                     163,644
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   337,170
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               22,496
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               11,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7,233
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,233
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (629)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,604
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $0.55
        


</TABLE>
H. R. 577

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3903 South 

Congress Avenue in Austin, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Henry Ybarra III Post 

Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT HENRY YBARRA III POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 3903 South Congress Avenue in Austin, Texas, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Henry Ybarra 

III Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Henry Ybarra III Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Elias M. Gregorio, Plaintiff, v J.M. Dennis Construction Company Corp., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Utica Mutual Insurance Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

[803 NYS2d 628]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that J.M. Dennis Construction Company Corp. is an additional insured under the insurance policy issued by Utica Mutual Insurance Company and that the carrier is required to defend and indemnify J.M. Dennis Construction Company Corp. in the main action, the carrier appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCarty III, J.), entered September 29, 2004, which granted the cross motion of J.M. Dennis Construction Company Corp. for summary judgment, made the declaration, and denied its motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

“A failure by the insurer to give [notice of disclaimer] as soon as is reasonably possible after it first learns of the accident or of grounds for disclaimer of liability or denial of coverage, precludes effective disclaimer or denial” *(Hartford Ins. Co. v County of Nassau,*46 NY2d 1028, 1029 [1979]; *see Matter of Firemen’s Fund Ins. Co. of Newark v Hopkins,*88 NY2d 836 [1996]; *Matter of Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Rosen,*205 AD2d 684 [1994]; *Kramer v Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co.,*176 AD2d 308 [1991]; *New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Markowitz,*147 AD2d 461 [1989]). This rule applies even where, as here, J.M. Dennis Construction Company Corp. (hereinafter J.M. Dennis) failed to provide Utica Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter the carrier) with timely notice of the claim in the first instance *(see Wasserheit v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.,*271 AD2d 439 [2000]; *Matter of Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v Rosen, supra; Kramer v Interboro Mut. Indem. Ins. Co., supra; New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v Markowitz, supra).*Where the ground for disclaiming coverage should have been readily apparent to the carrier when it first received notice of the claim, the requirement for timely notice is particularly applicable *(see Wasserheit*
      *1057
      *v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., supra).*The Supreme Court correctly determined, as a matter of law, that the carrier’s delay in disclaiming coverage was too long since the basis for the denial was evident from the face of the late notice of claim by J.M. Dennis and the accompanying complaint *(see West 16th St. Tenants Corp. v Public Serv. Mut. Ins. Co.,*290 AD2d 278 [2002]). Therefore, the court properly granted the cross motion of J.M. Dennis for summary judgment and denied the carrier’s motion.

The carrier’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Skelos, JJ, concur.