alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 891/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 891/2013 of 16 September 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for bigeye tuna in the Atlantic            Ocean by vessels flying the flag of Portugal         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 891/2013                     

# of 16 September 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for bigeye tuna in the Atlantic Ocean by vessels flying the flag of Portugal

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 September 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert TURNER.

No. 298P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Christopher M. Vann, Matthews, for Robert Turner.

Patricia A. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of June 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."

Upon consideration of the alternative petition filed by Defendant on the 6th day of June 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."
JONES v. HARRELSON & SMITH CONTRACTORS.

No. 36A07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 15, 2007.

William F. Ward, III, Chicago, IL, J. Donald Cowan, Jr., Angela L. Little, Greensboro, for Jones.

Donald S. Higley, II, Greenville, for Harrelson & Smith Contractors.

Hannah G. Styron, Raleigh, for NCADA, Amicus.

Burton Craige, Raleigh, for NCATL.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of February 2007 by N.C. Association of Defense Attorneys and the N.C. Academy of Trial Lawyers for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 15th day of February 2007."
STATE v. Dewey G. SPRINKLE.

No. 570PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2006.

L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Mercedes O. Chut, Greensboro, for Dewey Graceaon Sprinkle.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of October 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion for Stay Dissolved by order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of December 2006."

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON recused.
ARMSTRONG v. KNIGHT.

No. 501P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Thomasine E. Moore, Jacksonville, for Knight.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of February *7642007 by Plaintiff for "Petition for Rehearing":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00772-CV

Alan S. Owens, Appellant

v.

Shari B. Kasberg, Appellee

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW OF BURNET COUNTY

NO. C3010, HONORABLE W. R. SAVAGE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on January 7, 2014.

On February 13, 2014, Alan S. Owens was notified that no clerk’s record had been filed due to his

failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the county court clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s

record. The notice requested that Owens make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a

status report regarding this appeal by February 24, 2014. Further, the notice advised Owens that his

failure to complywith this request could result in the dismissal of his appeal for want of prosecution.

To date, Owens has not filed a status report or otherwise responded to this Court’s notice, and the

clerk’s record has not been filed.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to appellant’s failure to pay

or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without
payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, Owens has not established that he is entitled

to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1 (providing procedure for establishing

indigence on appeal). Because Owens has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee

for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Goodwin, and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: March 28, 2014

2
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 337/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 337/2013 of 12 April 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 337/2013                     

# of 12 April 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 April 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 11.01

                              AT HOME CORPORATION

STATEMENT REGARDING THE COMPUTATION OF PRO FORMA BASIC AND DILUTED NET 
                                LOSS PER SHARE
                     (in thousands, except per share data)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                                           PERIOD FROM
                                               YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,   MARCH 28, 1995
                                              -------------------------  (INCEPTION) TO
                                                  1997         1996       DEC. 31, 1995
                                              ------------  -----------  ---------------
                                               (Restated)
<S>                                           <C>           <C>          <C>
Computation of pro forma basic and diluted
   net loss per share:

Net loss....................................    $(55,717)     $(24,513)      $ (2,756)
                                                ========      ========       ========
Shares of weighted average common stock.....       8,291           868             --
Common equivalent shares from convertible
   preferred stock..........................      95,252        95,252         95,252 
                                                --------      --------        -------
Pro forma shares used in per share                                           
   calculation..............................     103,543        96,120         95,252
                                                ========      ========        =======
Pro forma basic and diluted net                                              
   loss per share...........................    $  (0.54)     $  (0.26)       $ (0.03)
                                                ========      ========        =======
</TABLE>
<PAGE>

Exhibit 11

ALLIN COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

CALCULATION OF NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

                  (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       Period                Year                  Year
                                                                        Ended                Ended                 Ended
                                                                    December 31,         December 31,          December 31,
                                                                        1994                 1995                  1996
                                                                    ---------------     ----------------      ----------------
<S>                                                                 <C>                 <C>                   <C>
Net loss                                                            $          (612)    $         (2,168)     $         (8,347)

Accretion and dividends on preferred stock                                  ---                  ---                       106
                                                                    ---------------     ----------------      ----------------

Net loss applicable to common shareholders                          $          (612)    $         (2,168)      $        (8,453)
                                                                    ===============     ================       ===============

Net loss per common share                                           $         (0.24)    $          (0.83)      $         (2.81)
                                                                    ===============     ================       ===============

Weighted average common shares outstanding
             during the period (1)                                        2,400,000            2,400,000             2,839,010

Effect of common stock equivalents                                           ---                  ---                   ---

Effect of conversion of preferred stock
             issued within one year of the offering                         203,385              203,385               169,488
                                                                    ----------------    ----------------       ---------------

Shares used in calculating net loss per common
             share                                                        2,603,385            2,603,385             3,008,498
                                                                    ===============     ================       ===============

</TABLE>

(1)  The weighted average common shares outstanding has been retroactively
     restated for the effect of the 2,400 for 1 stock split.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 980/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 980/2013 of 11 October 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 980/2013                     

# of 11 October 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended.





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, the undersigned officer of DXP Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  March 16, 2011





/s/David R. Little


David R. Little


President and Chief Executive Officer








The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


July 12, 2016


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 251


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on July 11, 2016, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms and
Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the
evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-211085) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
PERSONNEL PROPERTIES, LLC v. COMBINED THERAPY SPECIALTIES OF ASHEVILLE, INC.

No. COA06-660.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from Buncombe (05CVS570).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit
32.1





TELETOUCH
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.





OFFICER’S
CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Robert M. McMurrey, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.           The
Report is in full compliances with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/Robert M.
      McMurreyRobert
      M. McMurreyChief
      Executive OfficerJanuary
      14, 2011
JONES v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY SCHOOLS.

No. COA05-687.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #187952).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed in part, reversed part, and remanded.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6078** 

MICHAEL PAUL PUZEY , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN FCC ALLENWOOD , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Martinsburg
. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. ( 3:15

- cv - 00067

- GMG

- MJA )

Submitted : June 23, 2016 Decided: June 28, 2016

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Michael Paul Puzey , Appellan t Pro Se
. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Paul Puzey , a federal prisoner, appeals the district court ’ s order denying his motion to alter or amend the district court’s prior order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Puzey v. Warden , No. 3:15

- cv - 00067

- GMG

- MJA (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 7, 2016)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED