alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ James C. MastandreaJames C. MastandreaChairman of the Board, 
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal executive officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Henry Scott LOCKHART.

No. 33P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

David Childers, Mount Holly, for Lockhart.

Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, John Snyder, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*557*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of January 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
Doyle TERRY v. DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 235P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 24, 2007.

Terry Doyle, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Plaintiff on the 21st day of May 2007 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the *101following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Caswell County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of May 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 391/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 391/2013 of 3 May 2013 laying down a common charging scheme for air navigation            services (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 391/2013                     

# of 3 May 2013

# laying down a common charging scheme for air navigation services

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/317 of 11 February 2019 laying down a performance and charging scheme in the                                 single European sky and repealing Implementing Regulations (EU) No 390/2013 and (EU) No 391/2013 (Text with EEA relevance.).
STATE of North Carolina v. David Franklin HURT.

No. 192A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Lisa Bradley Dawson, Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

*189*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States vacating the judgment of this Court in *North Carolina v. Speight,* ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2977, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2006) and remanding that cause for further consideration in light of its decision in *Washington v. Recuenco,* ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2546, 165 L.Ed.2d 466 (2006), the following order is entered:

The State shall have 20 days from the filing of this order to file and serve a supplemental brief with this Court, limited to the questions of whether there was error in this case pursuant to *Washington v. Recuenco* and, if so, whether any error can be found to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. *State v. Hurt,*359 N.C. 840, 616 S.E.2d 910 (2005). Defendant may file its brief in response within 20 days after service of the State's brief upon him. Each side will be allowed up to 20 minutes of oral argument.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 17th day of August, 2006.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1327/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1327/2013 of 11 December 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in NAFO area            3LN by vessels flying the flag of a Member State of the European Union         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1327/2013                     

# of 11 December 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in NAFO area 3LN by vessels flying the flag of a Member State of the European                        Union                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 12a0617n.06

No. 11-3867

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

TYRONE R. JOHNSON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

PHILLIP KERNS, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF

OHIO

Before: MARTIN and CLAY, Circuit Judges; HOOD, District Judge.*

PER CURIAM. Tyrone R. Johnson, an Ohio prisoner proceeding pro se, moves this Court

for a rehearing of its March 29, 2012 order denying his application for a certificate of appealability. 

The application for a certificate of appealability arose from the district court’s order denying

Johnson’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Upon review, we conclude that the Court did not act under any misapprehension of law or

fact in denying Johnson’s application for a certificate of appealability. See Fed. R. App. P. 40(a). 

Accordingly, the motion for rehearing is denied.

The Honorable Joseph M. Hood, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of *

Kentucky, sitting by designation.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1378/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1378/2013 of 19 December 2013 on the issue of import licences for applications            lodged during the first seven days of December 2013 under the tariff quotas opened by Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 for poultrymeat         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1378/2013                     

# of 19 December 2013

# on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of December 2013 under the tariff quotas                        opened by Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 for poultrymeat                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration                           of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences(2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,                        

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 of 14 May 2007 opening and providing for the administration of tariff                           quotas in the poultrymeat sector(3), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 opened tariff quotas for imports of poultrymeat products.

(2)The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of December 2013 for the subperiod from 1 January                              to 31 March 2014 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may                              be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged under Regulation (EC) No 533/2007 for the subperiod                     from 1 January to 31 March 2014 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex to this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 December 2013.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.                           

3

OJ L 125, 15.5.2007, p. 9.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41744]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14915]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

[OMB Number 1121-0346]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection of 
eComments Requested; Withdrawal

AGENCY: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  On July 6, 2022, the Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of 
Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, published a notice for 
eCollection of eComments on reinstatement with change, of a previously 
approved collection for which approval has expired: 2022 Census of 
State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (CSLLEA). The notice is hereby 
withdrawn.

DATES:  The document published at 87 FR 40552-40553 is withdrawn as of 
July 13, 2022.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 6, 2022, the Department of Justice 
published a Federal Register Notice requesting comments regarding the 
planned reinstatement of a previously approved information collection, 
the 2022 Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (CSLLEA). 
This notice was published in error as a notice requesting comments on 
this collection had previously been published on June 6, 2022 at 87 FR 
34906. Therefore, the Department of Justice hereby withdraws the 
notice.
    If additional information is required contact: Robert Houser, 
Assistant Director, United States Department of Justice, Justice 
Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution 
Square, 145 N Street NE, 3E.405A, Washington, DC 20530.

    Dated: July 8, 2022.
Robert Houser,
Assistant Director, Policy and Planning Staff, U.S. Department of 
Justice.
[FR Doc. 2022-14915 Filed 7-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, John D. Reedy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants third
fiscal quarter of 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 6, 2006



/s/ John D. ReedyJohn D. ReedyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




29
EXHIBIT  24.1


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

 KNOW  ALL  MEN  BY THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose signature appears
below   constitutes  and  appoints  Charles  A.  Little,  his  true  and  lawful
attorney-in-fact  and  agent with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the
Quarterly  Report  on Form 10-Q of ClubCorp, Inc. for the period ended September
5,  2000,  together  with  any amendments thereto, and to file the same with all
exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission,  granting  unto  said attorney-in-fact and agent full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary  to  be  done  in  and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes  as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that  said  attorney-in-fact  and  agent  or  his substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully  do  or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements
of  the  Securities  Act  of  1934,  as amended, this Power of Attorney has been
signed  by  the  following  person  in  the  capacity and on the date indicated:




Signature  /s/ James M. Hinckley
           ---------------------
           James M. Hinckley

Title:     Chief Operating Officer and Director
Date:      October 19, 2000
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 640/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 640/2013 of 3 July 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 640/2013                     

# of 3 July 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 July 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
SANDERS v. GRAY, INC.

No. COA06-755.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Carteret (05CVD983).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16815]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1910-BJ, ES-053598, Group 22, Maine]


Survey Plat Filing; Maine

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, DOI.

ACTION: Notice of filing of plat of survey; Maine.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands we surveyed are:
    Township 1, Range 6, East of the West Line of the State.
    The plat of the dependent resurvey and survey of the boundaries of 
the land held in trust by the United States, for the Penobscot Indian 
Nation, in Township 1, Range 6, West of the East Line of the State, (T. 
1, R. 6, W.E.L.S.), Penobscot County, Maine, was accepted August 18, 
2005. We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. 
It will be available to the public as a matter of information.
    If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the 
plat, prior to the date of official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

    Dated: August 18, 2005.
Stephen D. Douglas,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 05-16815 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
IN RE W.D.M.

No. COA06-318.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 6, 2007.

Certification March 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Stokes (05J35).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.