alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAPE FEAR MEDICAL CENTER, L.L.C. v. S.K. ANDERSON CONST. CO., INC.

No. COA06-37

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from New Hanover (04CVS813).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
_____________ No. 96-1449MN

_____________ State of Minnesota, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * Richard W. Bullock, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: March 20, 1996 Filed: March 26, 1996

_____________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Richard W. Bullock appeals the district court's order imposing a $1,000 sanction after Bullock filed a second notice to remove stat e criminal proceedings against him on the eve of the state trial. We find no abuse of discretio n by the district court. Although Bullock was given an opportunity to show cause why he should not b e sanctioned, Bullock made no atte mpt to oppose the district court's finding that his successiv e removal action was maliciously and frivolously i nstituted for the improper purpose of delay, or to provide any information why the amount should have been less. See Pope v. Federal Express Corp. , 49 F.3d 1327, 1328 (8th Cir . 1995); Kirk Capital Corp. v. Bailey , 16 F.3d 1485, 1490 (8th Cir. 1994). We thus affirm the sanction ordered by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# The Seeds (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2013 No. 304

Seeds

# The Seeds (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

*19*th December 2013                        

Coming into operation

20th January 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (14.7.2016) by The Seed Marketing Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016 (S.R. 2016/244), regs. 1, **35(2)(i)**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             69859
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                        2527
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                   75457
<CASH>                                            2223
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                 379
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  100409
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                               5186
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   55005
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   9225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        3438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    100409
<PREMIUMS>                                        2306
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                               1154
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 124
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     270
<BENEFITS>                                        1733
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        458
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               986
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    398
<INCOME-TAX>                                       142
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                256
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       256
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    41.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    41.53
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   47035
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                               2680
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                (946)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                 309
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                  3019
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  45441
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# The Rates (Exemption for Automatic Telling Machines in Rural Areas) Order (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2013 No. 17

Rates

# The Rates (Exemption for Automatic Telling Machines in Rural Areas) Order (Northern Ireland) 2013

Made

31st January 2013

Affirmed by resolution of the Assembly on

25th February 2013

Coming into operation

1st April 2013

The Department of Finance and Personnel makes the following Order in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 42(1G) of                           the Rates (Northern Ireland) Order 1977 F1.                        

F1S.I. 1977/2157 (N.I. 28); Article 42(1G) was inserted by Article 25 of the Rates (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2006 (S.I. 2006/2956 (N.I. 18))

## Citation and commencementN.I.

1.  This Order may be cited as the Rates (Exemption for Automatic Telling Machines in Rural Areas) Order (Northern Ireland) 2013                     and shall come into operation on 1st April 2013.                  

## Definition of “relevant year”N.I.

2.  For the purposes of the definition of “relevant year” in Article 42(1G) of the Rates (Northern Ireland) Order 1977 the Department                     of Finance and Personnel hereby specifies the later date of 1st April 2015.                  

## RevocationN.I.

3.  The Rates (Exemption for Automatic Telling Machines in Rural Areas) Order (Northern Ireland) 2010 F2 is revoked.                  

F2S.R. 2010 No. 17

Sealed with the Official Seal of the Department of Finance and Personnel on 31st January 2013

L.S.

Brian McClure

 A senior officer of the

Department of Finance and Personnel

## Explanatory Note

(This note is not part of the Order)

Article 42(1F) and (1G) of the Rates (Northern Ireland) Order 1977 (“the 1977 Order”) provides that there shall be distinguished in the NAV list as wholly exempt from rates any automatic telling machine which                        is situated in a rural area during a financial year ending before such date as is specified by an Order made by the Department                        of Finance and Personnel. 1st April 2015 is specified by this Order.                     

This Order also revokes the Rates (Exemption for Automatic Telling Machines in Rural Areas) Order (Northern Ireland) 2010                        which specified 1st April 2013 for the purposes of Article 42(1F) and (1G) of the 1977 Order.
Sandra Dale HELTON, Administratrix of the Estate of Garland Ray Sawyer v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION.

No. 46P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

George W. Moore, Asheville, for Sandra Helton.

*816Donna Wojcik, Assistant Attorney General, for NC Dept. of Correction.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 26th day of January 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th day of January 2006 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 7239** 

JONATHAN HENSLEE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. SINGLETON, Avery/Mitchell Correctional Officer , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 00090

- RJC )

Submitted : November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25 , 2014

Before KING and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jonathan Leigh Henslee , Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Grande , NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jonathan Leigh Henslee seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying Henslee’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel.
This cour t may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949). The
order Henslee seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny as moot Henslee’s motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument
because the f acts and legal contentions are adequately prese nted
in the materials before this c ourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 972/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 972/2013 of 9 October 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications (Μεσσαρά (Messara) (PDO))         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 972/2013                     

# of 9 October 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Μεσσαρά (Messara)                        (PDO))                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection                              of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs(2).

(2)Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Greece’s application to register the name ‘Μεσσαρά’ (Messara) was                              published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Μεσσαρά’ (Messara) should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 October 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

Joaquín Almunia                            

*Vice-President*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.5.****Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)**U.K.

#### GREECEU.K.

Μεσσαρά (Messara) (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.                           

3

OJ C 396, 21.12.2012, p. 24.
STATE of North Carolina v. Arkim RIDDICK.

No. 284P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Jarvis John Edgerton, IV, for Arkim Riddick.

Richard Graham, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 24th day of May 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of May 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*20"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 11

                    YOUNG BROADCASTING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                      RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                                  -------------------
                                                                           MARCH 31,                MARCH 31,
                                                                             1997                     1998
                                                                     -------------------      -------------------
<S>                                                                 <C>                      <C>
SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING
    FOR THE ENTIRE PERIOD-BASIC...................................         14,230,357               13,847,844
 
ISSUANCE OF 526,757 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FOR
     THE MERGER OF ADAM YOUNG INC. IN 1998........................                  -                  316,054
 
RETIREMENT OF 50,450 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK FOR
      THE MERGER OF ADAM YOUNG INC. IN 1998.......................                  -                  (30,270)
 
ISSUANCE OF 3,500 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK UPON
      EXERCISE OF OPTIONS IN 1998.................................                  -                    2,100
 
ISSUANCE OF 28,481 AND 3,334 SHARES OF COMMON
      STOCK TO THE COMPANY'S DEFINED CONTRIBUTION
      PLAN........................................................             25,316                    2,741
                                                                     -------------------      ------------------- 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF COMMON
       STOCK OUTSTANDING-BASIC....................................         14,255,673               14,138,469
                                                                     -------------------      -------------------
NET LOSS..........................................................        $(5,566,042)             $(7,334,676)
 
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE-BASIC
       NET LOSS...................................................        $     (0.39)             $     (0.52)
</TABLE>
In re Jeffrey McArthur Carter EL-BEY.

No. 166P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 11, 2007.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of April 2007 by Petitioner for "Petition for Writ of Prohibition":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of April 2007."
EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



Entity                                             Jurisdiction of Formation
<S>                                                           <C>
Envoy Inns of Morrisville, LLC                             Delaware
JAGI Cleveland - Hudson, LLC                               Delaware
JAGI Cleveland - Independence, LLC                         Delaware
JAGI Montrose West, LLC                                    Delaware
JAGI North Canton, LLC                                     Delaware
Janus American Services Corp.                              Delaware
Janus Cleveland - Independence, Inc.                       Delaware
Janus Hospitality I, L.L.C.                                Delaware
JI Subsidiary, Inc.                                        Delaware
Kings Dominion Lodge, G.P.                                 Virginia
Beckelbe, Inc.                                             Delaware
Beckelbe, Ltd.                                             Ohio
JAGI Juno, L.L.C.                                          Delaware
Motel Associates of Pompano Beach, Inc.                    Florida

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Ray CRUMP.

No. 58P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

Michael Ray Crump, pro se.

Kelly Sandling, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 31st day of January 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."
EXHIBIT 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the accompanying periodic report of Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Brian Peay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 22, 2006 |  | /s/ Brian Peay                       
|                     |  | Brian Peay                           
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                     |  | Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-20829, No. 333-20833, No. 333-37642,
and No. 333-141935) of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. of our report dated October 14, 2005, with respect to the consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in
stockholders' equity and cash flows of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K/A
of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Denver,
Colorado
November 2, 2007

---



QuickLinks
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1045/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1045/2013 of 25 October 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1045/2013                     

# of 25 October 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.