alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       0001020424                       
<NAME>                                     Wireless Cable & Communications, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                          U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                          77,991
<SECURITIES>                                   440,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               245,437
<PP&E>                                             433
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,729,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          445,224
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,458
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,729,271
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               636,844
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (697,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (697,954)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (697,954)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.020)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.020)
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT32**

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Young Broadcasting Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

November 9, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Vincent J. Young    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Vincent J. Young        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | /s/ James A. Morgan     |   |
|   | James A. Morgan         |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5553 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5553

        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain travel bags.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2008

   Mr. Issa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on certain travel bags.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TRAVEL BAGS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Travel bags of      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          manmade fibers,                                                    31/2011.......
                          with wheels, a
                          telescoping
                          handle, and
                          stowable shoulder
                          straps, valued
                          over $30, not to
                          exceed 4,900
                          cubic inches (80
                          liters) in volume
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          4202.12.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 534/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 534/2013 of 10 June 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 534/2013                     

# of 10 June 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 June 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. DUARTE.

COA06-137.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Forsyth (02CRS63586, 03CRS6165).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
STATE v. GOODE

No. COA06-880.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Rutherford (02CRS1636, 02CRS55870).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL DATA  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S  UNAUDITED FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE  QUARTERLY  PERIOD  ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       15,733
<SECURITIES>                                  4,198
<RECEIVABLES>                                13,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                    883
<INVENTORY>                                  22,002
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             58,592
<PP&E>                                       22,256
<DEPRECIATION>                               14,154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               93,439
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        11,868
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                         41
<OTHER-SE>                                   76,359
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 93,439
<SALES>                                      13,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             14,428
<CGS>                                         7,770
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 7,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              6,451
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 193
<INCOME-TAX>                                     82
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             111
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    111
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0


</TABLE>
STATE v. Benjamin GATTI.

No. 678P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Parker, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of December 2005 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal and Alternatively Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of January 2006."
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 25, 2003 of Edelbrock Corporation (the Company) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, O.
Victor Edelbrock, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d));
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

|                 |  |                              
|---------------- |  | -----------------------------
|November 6, 2003 |  | O. VICTOR EDELBROCK          
|                 |  |                              
|                 |  | O. Victor Edelbrock          
|                 |  | Chairman, President and Chief
|                 |  | Executive Officer            

21
Exhibit 31 (a)
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
     /s/ Richard H. SmithChief Executive Officer
ALLSTATE INS. CO. v. STILWELL

No. COA05-1393-2

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Caldwell (04CVS1380).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. HOWIE

No. COA06-1307

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS250260, 04CRS250261).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JOHN J. HANNAN,
the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                    
|--------------------
|                    
|/s/ JOHN J. HANNAN  
|Name: John J. Hannan
|Date: August 8, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5551 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5551

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to implement the 
  increase provided under the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 
  2008, in the amount of funds made available for the compensation of 
 attorneys representing indigent defendants in the District of Columbia 
                     courts, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. IMPLEMENTATION OF INCREASE PROVIDED IN FUNDING FOR 
COMPENSATION OF ATTORNEYS REPRESENTING INDIGENT DEFENDANTS IN DISTRICT 
OF COLUMBIA COURTS.
    (a) Increase in Hourly Rate.--Section 11-2604(a), District of 
Columbia Official Code, is amended by striking ``$65 per hour'' and 
inserting ``$80 per hour''.
    (b) Increase in Caps on Total Compensation Paid for Particular 
Cases.--Section 11-2604(b), District of Columbia Official Code, is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) The compensation to be paid to an attorney appointed pursuant 
to this chapter shall not exceed the following maximum amounts:
        ``(1) For representation of a defendant before the Superior 
    Court of the District of Columbia for misdemeanors or felonies, the 
    maximum amount set forth in section 3006A(d)(2) of title 18, United 
    States Code, for representation of a defendant before the United 
    States magistrate judge or the district court for misdemeanors or 
    felonies (as the case may be).
        ``(2) For representation of a defendant before the District of 
    Columbia Court of Appeals, the maximum amount set forth in section 
    3006A(d)(2) of title 18, United States Code, for representation of 
    a defendant in an appellate court.
        ``(3) For representation of a defendant in post-trial matters 
    for misdemeanors or felonies, the amount applicable under paragraph 
    (1) for misdemeanors or felonies (as the case may be).''.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.
    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to cases 
and proceedings initiated on or after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Leo MAY v. DOWN EAST HOMES OF BEULAVILLE, INC., d/b/a Down East Homes of Jacksonville.

No. 64P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Albert L. Willis, for Leo May.

Brian M. Williams, Raleigh, Gregory E. Floyd, for Down East Homes.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 9th day of February 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lason, Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2003, each of the undersigned hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my respective knowledge and belief,
that:  (1)
    
    such Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lason, Inc. for the year
ended December, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Lason, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003, fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Lason, Inc. The foregoing Certification is subject to and qualified by the disclosure
in Part I, Item 1. Business  Fresh Start Reporting and Factors that Affect
Comparability of Financial Information and in Note 2 of Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements, which provide that the consolidated
financial statements of the registrant accompanying this annual report on Form
10-K have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles for financial information, but not in conformity with the
instructions for Form 10-K, Regulation S-K and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X, as
the registrant has not presented financial information for the twelve months
ending December 31, 2002, and 2001. In addition, the financial information for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, 2001, 2000, and/or 1999 have been
omitted from those applicable items of the Form 10-K requiring such
information. Reference is made to the disclosure  Part I, Item 1. Business
 Fresh Start Reporting and Factors that Affect Comparability of Financial
Information and in Note 2 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
a more complete discussion and explanation. /s/ Ronald D. RisherMarch 29, 2004
    
    Ronald D. Risher
Chief Executive OfficerMarch 29, 2004
    
    /s/ Douglas S. KearneyDouglas S. Kearney
Chief Financial Officer
In re C.D.A.W.

No. 110A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 12, 2006.

Gary C. Rhodes, Salisbury, for Angela Wright Eagle.

Joyce Terres, Attorney Advocate, for Guardian At Litem.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of July 2006 by Petitioner (Guilford County DSS) for Extension of Time to File New Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Petitioner (Guilford County DSS) shall have up to and including the 24th day of August 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of July 2006."
STATE v. Timothy BLACKWELL.

No. 490PA04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 16, 2006.

Patricia A. Duffy, Robert C. Montgomery, Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney Generals, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Marilyn G. Ozer, Chapel Hill, Benjamin Dowling-Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Timothy Earl Blackwell.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of October 2006 by Attorney General for Leave to File Reply Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of October 2006."