alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7088

MICHAEL STEVEN SAYKO,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JON P. GALLEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE

OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA04-1677-8-DKC)

Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 1, 2006

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Steven Sayko, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael Steven Sayko, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal

the district court’s order denying as untimely and procedurally

defaulted his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district

court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or

wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district

court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Sayko has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3186 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 835
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3186

 To provide funding for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                June 24 (legislative day, June 23), 2008

    Mr. Sanders (for himself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Brown, and Mr. Cardin) 
      introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                             June 25, 2008

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide funding for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Warm in Winter and Cool in Summer 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LOW-INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE APPROPRIATIONS.

    (a) In General.--In addition to any amounts appropriated under any 
other provision of Federal law, there is appropriated, out of any money 
in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for fiscal year 2008--
            (1) $1,265,000,000 (to remain available until expended) for 
        making payments under subsections (a) through (d) of section 
        2604 of the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Act of 1981 (42 
        U.S.C. 8623); and
            (2) $1,265,000,000 (to remain available until expended) for 
        making payments under section 2604(e) of the Low-Income Home 
        Energy Assistance Act of 1981 (42 U.S.C. 8623(e)), 
        notwithstanding the designation requirement of section 2602(e) 
        of such Act (42 U.S.C. 8621(e)).
    (b) Emergency Requirement.--The amount provided under this section 
is designated as an emergency requirement and necessary to meet 
emergency needs, pursuant to section 204 of S. Con. Res. 21 (110th 
Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 
2008.
                                                       Calendar No. 835

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3186

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To provide funding for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 25, 2008

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
# L_2013199EN.01000101.xml

| 24.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 199/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 701/2013

of 11 July 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (East Kent Goldings (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘East Kent Goldings’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘East Kent Goldings’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘East Kent Goldings’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘East Kent Goldings’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 July 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 285, 21.9.2012, p. 14.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.8.   Other products of Annex I to the Treaty (spices, etc.)

UNITED KINGDOM

East Kent Goldings (PDO)

---
STATE v. RISHER.

COA05-1249.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (02CRS206557)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
MARTIN COUNTY v. ANGE

No. COA06-806

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Martin (04CVD156).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 8, 2019

No. 04-18-00617-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Heberto GARZA-GARCIA,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-CRS-266

The Honorable Everardo Garcia, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On January 1, 2019, appellee filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief. The 

motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due on January 22, 2019. No further extensions 

will be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of January, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      14,718,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,476,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (241,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             118,461,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     29,316,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    300,000
<COMMON>                                       100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  86,011,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               118,461,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,441,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,343,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,706,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,821,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,571,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,571,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                160,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,731,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas B.  Specketer,  Vice President and  Controller of  MidAmerican  Energy
Company (the "Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the  quarterly
     period  ended  March  31,  2003  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:   May 12, 2003




                             /s/ Thomas B. Specketer
                             -----------------------
                               Thomas B. Specketer
                          Vice President and Controller
                            (chief financial officer)



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to  MidAmerican  Energy  Company  and will be  retained by  MidAmerican
Energy Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
Kevin TURNER and wife, Lara Turner v. Douglas E. ELLIS.

No. 537P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

George B. Hyler, Jr., Robert J. Lopez, Asheville, for Ellis.

Patrick U. Smathers, Canton, for Turner.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of October 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3105 

To authorize funding for the Advancing Justice through DNA Technology 

initiative. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2008 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize funding for the Advancing Justice through 

DNA Technology initiative. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Funding DNA Tech5 nology Initiative Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DNA INITIATIVE. 

7 There are authorized to be appropriated for the pro8 grams, grants, and other activities under the Advancing 

9 Justice through DNA Technology initiative announced by 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3105 IS

1 the President on March 11, 2003, $217,000,000 for each 

2 of fiscal years 2009 and 2010. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
****
 **EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
302 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Todd
M. Raba, certify that:
 
 1.
    
    I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MidAmerican Energy
      Company;2.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;3.
    
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
      registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
      report;4.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and we have:a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and5.
    
    The
      registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  function):a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 Date: May
6, 2005
 /s/
Todd M. Raba
 Todd M.
Raba
 President
 (chief
executive officer)
Presidential Documents

42059 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 134 

Thursday, July 14, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of July 8, 2022 

Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 621 of the Foreign 

Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the Secretary of State 

the authority under section 506(a)(1) of the FAA to direct the drawdown 

of up to $400 million in defense articles and services of the Department 

of Defense, and military education and training, to provide assistance to 

Ukraine and to make the determinations required under such section to 

direct such a drawdown. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, July 8, 2022 

[FR Doc. 2022–15183 

Filed 7–13–22; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10–P 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PREZ DOC 1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
STATE of North Carolina v. Ronald Lee PEAK.

No. 11P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Ronald Lee Peak, Pro Se.

Lars F. Nance, Assistant Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of January 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*17"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 57

AN ACT

To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, 

pertaining to the Virgin Islands.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 57 EH

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS PERTAINING TO 

2 THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. 

3 (a) REPEAL.—Sections 1 through 6 of the Act of May 

4 26, 1936 (Chapter 450; 49 Stat. 1372–1373; 48 U.S.C. 

5 1401–1401e) are repealed. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall be deemed 

7 to have taken effect on July 22, 1954. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 17, 

2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 57

AN ACT

To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 

1936, pertaining to the Virgin Islands.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6222

EDSON FURTADO,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF MARYLAND, Office of the Attorney General; CLIFTON T.

PERKINS HOSPITAL CENTER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv02627-RWT)

Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 30, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edson Furtado, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Edson Furtado appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action

seeking damages for issues pertaining to his confinement in a

psychiatric hospital. In his informal appellate brief, Furtado

fails to address the district court’s basis for dismissing his

case. Therefore, Furtado has waived appellate review of that

issue. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (“The Court will limit its review to

the issues raised in the informal brief.”). Accordingly, we deny

Furtado’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
STATE v. TUCKER

No. COA06-605.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from Harnett (04CRS56520).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Vacated and remanded.
IN RE C.K.P.

No. COA06-1122.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 6, 2007.

Certification March 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Onslow (05J73).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR v. Robert K. LEONARD, Attorney.

No. 449P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 28, 2006.

David B. Freedman, Winston-Salem, Dudley A. Witt, for Leonard.

David R. Johnson, Deputy Counsel, for N.C. State Bar.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 632 S.E.2d 183.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of August 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 28th day of December 2006."