alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32**

 

 

CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of YoungBroadcasting Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), theundersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuantto ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| August 14, 2003 |                    |
|-----------------|-------------------------|
|            |                    |
|            | /s/ Vincent J. Young    |
|            | Vincent J. Young        |
|            | Chief Executive Officer |
|            |                    |
|            |                    |
|            | /s/ James A. Morgan     |
|            | James A. Morgan         |
|            | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
THOMAS v. THOMAS

No. COA06-1497.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Surry (05CVS907).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
STATE v. STEPHENS.

No. COA05-1218.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS57426, 04CRS35977).

Case without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. BEASLEY

No. COA06-1151.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CR246840, 04CR250368, 05CR243178).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed in part and affirmed in part.
STATE v. HUFF

No. COA06-1320

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Wake (04CRS86060).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in trial; remanded for clerical corrections.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A1500. ELLIS v. THE STATE.

Appellant did not file an enumeration of error(s) or brief within 20 days of the

docketing of the appeal as directed. On May 28, 2014, this Court ordered Appellant

to file an enumeration of error(s) and brief within ten (10) days or subject the appeal

to dismissal. 

As of the date of this order, Appellant has not filed an enumeration of error(s)

or brief as ordered by this Court, and no motion for extension for good cause has been

filed. Therefore, this appeal is DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/25/2014

July 25, 2014
# L_2013169EN.01006201.xml

| 21.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 169/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 169/62

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 587/2013

of 20 June 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Fraises de Nîmes (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Fraises de Nîmes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Fraises de Nîmes’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Fraises de Nîmes’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Fraises de Nîmes’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 June 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 296, 2.10.2012, p. 9.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

FRANCE

Fraises de Nîmes (PGI)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5595 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5595

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to provide dental care to veterans with service-
            connected disabilities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 12, 2008

 Mr. Carney (for himself and Mr. Kirk) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
   Veterans Affairs to provide dental care to veterans with service-
            connected disabilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Make Our Veterans Smile Act of 
2008''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF DENTAL CARE BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO 
              VETERANS WITH SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITIES.

    (a) Provision of Care.--Section 1712(a)(1)(G) of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``rated as total''.
    (b) Authority To Provide Care by Entering Into Contracts.--Section 
1703(a)(7) of such title is amended by striking ``section 
1712(a)(1)(F)'' and inserting ``section 1712(a)(1)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
shall apply with respect to outpatient dental services and treatment, 
and related dental appliances, furnished on or after January 1, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Apex Minerals Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10 KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  August 26, 2004

/s/ Howard M. Oveson
Howard M. Oveson, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
STATE v. Samuel R. FLIPPEN.

No. 178A95-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Richard M. Greene, Greensboro, for Flippen.

Valerie Spalding, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

*AMENDED ORDER*

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of August 2006 by Defendant for Stay of Execution:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of August 2006."
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Dan R. Lee, Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Microtek Medical Holdings, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Form
10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|Date:  August 9, 2004 | /s/ Dan R. Lee                                            
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                      | Dan R. Lee
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2013355EN.01009001.xml

| 31.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 355/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 355/90

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 16 December 2013

appointing three Belgian members of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/810/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU and 2010/29/EU appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU and 2010/29/EU appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015 (1).

| (2) | Three members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Xavier DESGAIN, Mr Jean-François ISTASSE and Mr Michel LEBRUN. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Three members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Xavier DESGAIN, Mr Jean-François ISTASSE and Mr Michel LEBRUN.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed as members to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Mr Xavier DESGAIN, Conseiller communal à Charleroi |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Xavier DESGAIN, Conseiller communal à Charleroi

| — | Mr Jean-François ISTASSE, Conseiller communal à Verviers |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Jean-François ISTASSE, Conseiller communal à Verviers

| — | Mr Michel LEBRUN, Conseiller communal à Viroinval. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Michel LEBRUN, Conseiller communal à Viroinval.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2013.

For the Council

The President

V. JUKNA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22 and OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

1

---
STATE v. Harris Emanuel FORD.

No. 539P03-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of April 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review-Appellant's New Brief":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2006."
# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1054/2013Show full title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1054/2013 of 29 October 2013 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006            concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1054/2013                     

# of 29 October 2013

# implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus(1), and in particular Article 8a(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On18 May 2006, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 which concerns restrictive measures against Belarus. Those                              measures apply until 31 October 2013.

(2)On the basis of a review of Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP(2), the Council has decided that those restrictive measures should be extended until 31 October 2014.

(3)In view of the continuing gravity of the situation in Belarus, the Council considers that three persons should be added to                              the list of persons and entities to which the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/642/CFSP apply.

(4)The Council also considers that there are no longer grounds for keeping certain persons and entities on the list of persons                              and entities to which the restrictive measures provided for in Decision 2012/642/CFSP apply.

(5)Furthermore, the information relating to certain persons and entities set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should                              be updated.

(6)Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 October 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

L. Linkevičius                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### “ANNEX I

#### **Natural or legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in Article 2(1)**

1

OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1.                           

2

Council Decision 2012/642/CFSP of 15 October 2012 concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1).
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

I, Jeffrey Klausner, ChiefFinancial Officer of InfoSonics Corporation, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InfoSonicsCorporation;

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May 15, 2008 |   | /s/ Jeffrey  Klausner                 |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Jeffrey  Klausner, Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
SHAW v. SHAW

No. COA05-1644.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (01CVD2231).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,899
<SECURITIES>                                        23
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,516
<INVENTORY>                                     19,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,991
<PP&E>                                          30,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,971
<SALES>                                         54,023
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                54,023
<CGS>                                           38,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,725
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   467
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,591)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,684)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,907)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (360)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,267)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.40)
        

</TABLE>
Roy WALKER and Betty Staten v. FLEETWOOD HOMES OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., a North Carolina Corporation.

No. 223A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Clayton M. Custer, Greenville, SC, Philip J. Mohr, Winston-Salem, for Fleetwood Homes.

William F. Ward, III, for Walkers.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 627 S.E.2d 629.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 8th day of May 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 8th day of May 2006 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."