alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5752 

To provide for the security of United States passports, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2008 

Mr. SALI (for himself, Mr. HUNTER, Mr. WHITFIELD of Kentucky, Mr. 

MCCOTTER, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. RENZI, Mr. POE, Mr. 

DEAL of Georgia, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. TERRY, and 

Ms. FALLIN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for the security of United States passports, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds the following: 

5 (1) A United States passport is the primary 

6 document used to denote identity and citizenship for 

7 United States citizens for international travel. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5752 IH

1 (2) United States citizens have an expectation 

2 that United States passports will be manufactured 

3 and assembled in a secure manner. 

4 (3) All United States passports currently incor5 porate several components manufactured outside the 

6 United States. 

7 (4) All United States passports manufactured 

8 and assembled for United States citizens are cur9 rently sent to Thailand for the inlaying of the Radio 

10 Frequency Identification Device (RFID) antennae. 

11 (5) According to the Government Printing Of12 fice (GPO), the ‘‘GPO contracts with two suppliers 

13 (Gemalto and Infineon), who produce the chip in the 

14 e-passport and who subcontract with another vendor 

15 to do the inlaying. That subcontractor is an overseas 

16 company, who does inlaying and is the only company 

17 in the world who met standards required under the 

18 RFP.’’. 

19 (6) National security is best served when the 

20 manufacture and assembly of United States pass21 ports occurs within the borders of the United States. 

22 SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

23 It is the sense of Congress that— 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5752 IH

1 (1) the United States Government must set the 

2 highest standards needed to protect the privacy and 

3 security of United States passports; and 

4 (2) the Department of State must safeguard 

5 the security of the United States passport. 

6 SEC. 3. DEPARTMENT OF STATE. 

7 The Secretary of State shall— 

8 (1) when establishing the requirements for 

9 physical and security components of United States 

10 passports and passport cards, include only such elec11 tronic components as are currently manufactured in 

12 the United States, or can be manufactured in the 

13 United States; and 

14 (2) ensure that— 

15 (A) all assembly of United States pass16 ports occurs only within the borders of the 

17 United States; and 

18 (B) personalization of permanent United 

19 States passports occurs only under the direct 

20 supervision of United States Government em21 ployees. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
    (Form S-8) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan and the Directors Stock
    Option Plan of Janus Hotels and Resorts, Inc. of our report dated February
    20, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedules
    of Janus Hotels and Resorts, Inc. included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K
    for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Securities and Exchange
    Commission.

       /s/ Grant Thornton LLP


       February 20, 2002
BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Plaintiff v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Division of Facility Services, Defendant and North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Facility Services, Medical Facilities Planning Section, Defendant and Total Renal Care of North Carolina, LLC and Health Systems Management, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor.

No. 549A06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 2, 2007.

K. Edward Greene, Lee M. Whitman, Raleigh, Sarah M. Johnson, Winston-Salem, for Bio-Medical Applications.

Thomas R. West, Pamela A. Scott, William R. Shenton, Raleigh, Chad W. Essick, for Total Renal Care.

S. Todd Hemphill, Diana E. Ricketts, Raleigh, for Health Systems Management.

Susan K. Hackney, Amy Gray, Assistant Attorney Generals, for NCDHHS.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 2nd day of April 2007 for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of May 2007."
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Baker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | By: | /s/CHARLES BAKERCharles Baker
      Chief Financial Officer
      December 13, 2006 | 
| |  | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
In the Matter of H.M.L.

No. 571P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for H.M.L.

Judith Tillman, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of October 2005 by Juvenile in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
STATE v. Isaac H. REYNOLDS.

No. 588P03-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of October 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 25th day of January 2007."

Justices TIMMONS-GOODSON and HUDSON recused.
# The Rates (Unoccupied Hereditaments) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2013 No. 47

Rates

# The Rates (Unoccupied Hereditaments) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013

Made

6th March 2013

Coming into operation

1st April 2013

The Department of Finance and Personnel makes the following Regulations in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 25A(6)                           of, and paragraph 1(1) to (3) of Schedule 8A to, the Rates (Northern Ireland) Order 1977 F1.                        

F1S.I. 1977/2157 (N.I. 28); Article 25A and Schedule 8A were inserted by Article 4 of, and Schedule 1 to, the Rates (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2004 (S.I. 2004/703 (N.I. 4)); paragraph 1 of Schedule 8A was amended by Article 22 of the Rates (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 2006 (S.I. 2006/2954 (N.I. 18)); Article 25A and Schedule 8A were further amended by section 6 of the Rates (Amendment) Act (Northern Ireland) 2009 (2009 c.8 (N.I.))

## Citation and commencementN.I.

1.  These Regulations may be cited as the Rates (Unoccupied Hereditaments) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 and                     shall come into operation on 1st April 2013.                  

## Amendment of the Rates (Unoccupied Hereditaments) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2011N.I.

2.  In paragraph 2(1)(a)(iv) of the Schedule to the Rates (Unoccupied Hereditament) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2011 F2 for the words “eighteen months” there shall be substituted the words “ thirty months ”.                  

F2S.R. 2011 No. 36

Sealed with the Official Seal of the Department of Finance and Personnel on 6th March 2013

L.S.

Brian McClure

 A senior officer of the

Department of Finance and Personnel

## Explanatory Note

(This note is not part of the Regulations)

These Regulations amend paragraph 2 of the Schedule to the Rates (Unoccupied Hereditaments) Regulations (Northern Ireland)                        2011 (S.R. 2011 No. 36) to provide that the temporary exemption from unoccupied rates for a developer who is entitled to possession of a domestic                        hereditament, which first appeared in the valuation list before 1st April 2012 and has never been occupied, is extended from                        eighteen months to thirty months.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





Certification


Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections
      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
      Code)





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Dan R. Lee,
      Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Microtek Medical Holdings,
      Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to the best of
      my knowledge, that:





This
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form
      10-Q”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in this
      Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and
      results of operations of the Company.





May
                  10, 2007
              /s/
                  Dan R. LeeDan
                  R. LeeChairman,
                  President and Chief Executive
                  Officer
ATLANTIC VENEER CORP. v. ROBBINS.

COA06-31.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 7, 2006.

Certification Date November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the Carteret (04CVS58).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Young Broadcasting Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

August 6,2004

 
|   | /s/ Vincent  J. Young    |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Vincent  J. Young        |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                     |
|   |                     |
|   | /s/  James A. Morgan     |   |
|   | James  A. Morgan         |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Roy Wolvin, CFO of Nymox
Pharmaceutical Corporation, do hereby certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the information
contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2004 of Nymox
Pharmaceutical Corporation and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations on Nymox Pharmaceutical
Corporation

Date: October 24, 2005

| | /s/
Roy Wolvin           Roy Wolvin           Chief Financial Officer           Nymox
Pharmaceutical Corporation
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN RE A.C.

No. COA06-1432

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Chatham (06JA18).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 20-F of Minco Gold Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                      
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date: March 28, 2014





/s/ Ken Z. Cai

Ken Z. Cai, President
V

BOBBY SIMMONS
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS 

### NO.W\5^U § § § § IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

PRO SE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW 

# Ijlt15

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS: COMES NOW the Appellant in the above-styled and numbered
cause and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to extend the 

### time for filing the Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review in this Cause and in support thereof would show to the Court the following: 

### 1. The style andnumber of this case inthe Court ofAppeals, is BOBBY SIMMONS V. THE STATE OF TEXAS; Appeal No. 05-14-00241- CR, 05-14-00240-CR. 2. The style and number of the case in the trial court is: THE STATE OF TEXAS V. BOBBY SIMMONS; Cause No. F12-523070-W, 

### F12-52371-W; from the 363rd District Court of Dallas County, Texas. 3. The Appellant was convicted of the felony offenses of 

### possession with intent to deliver cocaine, and unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon. 

### 4. The conviction was affirmed in the Court ofAppeals on 12-18-2014. 

### 5. The deadline for filing the Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review in this cause is 1-17-2015 

### FILEDIN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS 

## JAN222015 AbelAcosta,Clerk 

# RECEIVED ©0URTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS 

### JAN202015 

### AfcstlAcosta,Clerk

# i|ll|!5

6. An extension of time for a period of sixty(60) days is requested that would make the date 3-17-2015. 7. No prior request for an extension of time has been made. 

### 8. The facts relied upon to show good cause for the requested 

### extension are, as follows: The-Appellant was represented bycourt appointed counsel during the appeals of this case to the Court of Appeals. After the conviction was affirmed, the trial court 

### refused toappoint counsel to file aPetition for Discretionary Review. Therefore, additional time is needed for the Appellant to either prepare and file the Petition pro se or to seek legal assistance in filing the petition. 

### WHEREFORE/ PREMISES CONSIDERED, THEAppellant respectfully requests that this Honorable Court extend time for filing the Petition for Discretionary review in this Cause to 3-17-2015. Respectfully submitted/ Bobby SMib sMmons#1941546 Telford Unit 3899 State Hwy 98 New Boston, Tx 75570 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### The Appellant herebycertifies that acopyof the foregoing Motion has been mailed to the Office of the Criminal District 

### Attorney for Dallas County, Frank Crowley Courts Building,133 N. Riverfront Blvd.,LB-19, Dallas, Texas 75207-4399, on this »>y day of January, 2015. Bobby SrmmoiLkJkAAjQUvfe-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - 22 CFR Part 62 
          - [Public Notice 5162] 
          - RIN 1400-AC13   

# AGENCY:

State Department. 

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of State published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 12, 2005, (70 FR 47152) concerning a proposed rule on regulations for secondary school students in the Exchange Visitor Program set forth at 22 CFR 62.25. The document contained omitted information regarding the requirements of criminal background checks on all program sponsor officers, employees, representatives, agents, and volunteers under paragraph (d)(1) and student orientation requirements under paragraph (g)(1).                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stanley S. Colvin, Office of Exchange Coordination, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State 202-203-5029; Fax 202-203-5087. 

# PART 62—[CORRECTED]

§ 62.25

## Corrections 

                                1. In the                                 **Federal Register**                                 of August 12, 2005, 70 FR 47152, Public Notice 5155, correct § 62.25(d)(1) and (g)(1) to read as follows:                             

§ 62.25 

* * * * *

(d) * * * 

(1) Are adequately trained and supervised and have successfully completed a criminal background check; 

* * * * *
      ( print page 49516)    
(g) * * * 

(1) A written summary of all operating procedures, rules, and regulations governing student participation in the exchange visitor program including information regarding the reporting of all instances of alleged sexual abuse or exploitation. 

* * * * *

Dated: August 15, 2005. 

Stanley S. Colvin, 

Director, Acting, Office of Exchange Coordination, Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 05-16827 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             204,612 
<SECURITIES>                                        63,159 
<RECEIVABLES>                                       47,047 
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0 
<INVENTORY>                                              0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   615,018 
<PP&E>                                             279,015 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (35,133)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,479,406 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               72,333 
<BONDS>                                             67,387 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                              0 
<COMMON>                                         1,339,686 
<OTHER-SE>                                               0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,479,406 
<SALES>                                            178,200 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   178,200 
<CGS>                                              853,891 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      853,891 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    76,420 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  (1,972)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (752,111)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (675,691)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      (752,111)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.055)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0 
                                               


</TABLE>