alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5539 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5539

       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sleeping bags.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2008

  Mr. Nunes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on certain sleeping bags.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SLEEPING BAGS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Sleeping bags of    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          manmade fiber,                                                     31/2011.......
                          with shell and
                          lining fabrics
                          not to exceed 2.2
                          ounces per square
                          yard in weight
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9404.30.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 29/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 29/2013 of 15 January 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for black scabbardfish in EU            and international waters of VIII, IX and X by vessels flying the flag of Portugal         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 29/2013                     

# of 15 January 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for black scabbardfish in EU and international waters of VIII, IX and X by vessels flying                        the flag of Portugal                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 1225/2010 of 13 December 2010 fixing for 2011 and 2012 the fishing opportunities for EU vessels                              for fish stocks of certain deep-sea fish species(2), lays down quotas for 2012.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2012.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2012 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 January 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 336, 21.12.2010, p. 1.
CARILLON v. NCDHHS, et al.

No. 54A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 2006.

Melissa L. Trippe, Mark A. Davis, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, Thomas M. Woodward, Susan K. Hackney, Assistant Attorney Generals, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Solicitor General, for NCDHHS et al.

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Forrest W. Campbell, Jr., Greensboro, Charles F. Marshall, III, Raleigh, for Carillon Assistant Living.

Allyson Jones Labban, Greensboro, for Ridge Care, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of October 2006 by Ridge Care, Inc. for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of October 2006."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16757]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Clinical Center; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(a) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of a meeting of 
the NIH Advisory Board for Clinical Research.
    The meeting will be open to the public, with attendance limited to 
space available. Individuals who plan to attend and need special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should notify the Contact Person listed below in 
advance of the meeting.

    Name of Committee: NIH Advisory Board for Clinical Research.
    Date: September 23, 2005.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To discuss progress of activities related to research 
opportunities, training, planning and funding in the NIH intramural 
clinical research program.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 10, 10 Center 
Drive, CRC Medical Board Room 4-2551, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Maureen E. Gormley, Executive Secretary, Mark O. 
Hatfield Clinical Research Center, National Institutes of Health, 
Building 10, Room 6-1610, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301/496-2897.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    In the interest of security, NIH has instituted stringent 
procedures for entrance into the building by non-government 
employees. Persons without a government I.D. will need to show a 
photo I.D. and sign-in at the security desk upon entering the 
building.

    Dated: August 17, 2005.
Anthony M. Coelho, Jr.,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-16757 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,404
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                167,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,258
<INVENTORY>                                  151,722
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             354,044
<PP&E>                                     1,960,413
<DEPRECIATION>                               568,425
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             1,939,647
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        690,650
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     105,900
<OTHER-SE>                                   439,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               1,939,647
<SALES>                                    1,103,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,121,526
<CGS>                                        293,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2,032,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            68,230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (393,767)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (393,767)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (393,767)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.06)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
32.3**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, David
L. Sokol, Chief Executive Officer of MidAmerican Funding, LLC (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 
 Dated:
May 6, 2005
 
 
 /s/
David L. Sokol
 David L.
Sokol
 Chief
Executive Officer
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 4, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

*Honorable Susan C. Bucklew, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida,

sitting by designation.

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

_____________________________

No. 07-13508

_____________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-00272-CV-ODE-1

GEORGE MARK TUGGLE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VICTOR HILL, Clayton County Sheriff

in both his official and individual capacities,

JOANN BORELLI, Deputy Sheriff,

Defendants-Appellants.

_______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(June 4, 2008)

Before CARNES and MARCUS, Circuit Judges, and BUCKLEW, District Judge. *
2

PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal of the district court’s determination, on summary

judgment, that the Appellants, Sheriff Victor Hill and Deputy Sheriff Joann

Borelli, were not entitled to assert the defense of qualified immunity. The

standard of review from a district court’s denial of summary judgment is de novo. 

Kingsland v. City of Miami, 382 F.3d 1220, 1225 (11th Cir. 2004). 

The district court found that Appellants were not entitled to assert the

defense of qualified immunity, and therefore were not entitled summary judgment

on any of Appellee George Mark Tuggle’s claims. Appellee’s complaint asserted

three claims against Appellants: false arrest in violation of the Fourth Amendment,

malicious prosecution in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and retaliatory

prosecution in violation of the First Amendment. The only issue before this Court

is the district court’s decision denying Appellants’ motion for summary judgment

on the Fourth Amendment claims for false arrest and malicious prosecution.

The facts of this case, viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving

party (here, Appellee George Mark Tuggle), show that Appellee made two short

phone calls within a three minute period, and in each requested a meeting with

Appellant Sheriff Victor Hill. In one phone call, Appellee used the term “scum,”

and in the other used the phrase “short lil’ bastard” in reference to Appellant
3

Sheriff Victor Hill. The district court correctly found that no reasonable police

officer could have believed that these facts established arguable probable cause to

arrest the Appellee for violating Georgia’s harassing phone calls statute.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s decision that Appellants are not

entitled to summary judgment on the Appellee’s Fourth Amendment claims for

false arrest and malicious prosecution.

AFFIRMED.
CARILLON v. NCDHHS, et al.

No. 54A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 22, 2006.

Melissa L. Trippe, Mark A. Davis, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, Thomas M. Woodward, Susan K. Hackney, Assistant Attorney Generals, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Solicitor General, for NCDHHS et al.

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Forrest W. Campbell, Jr., Greensboro, Charles F. Marshall, III, for Carillon Assistant Living.

Susan M. Fradenburg, Allyson Jones Labban, Greensboro, for Ridge Care, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of November 2006 by MedCath Diagnostics, LLC for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of November 2006."
STATE v. ASKEW

No. COA06-507

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Pasquotank (04CRS1539, 04CRS1540, 04CRS1541, 04CRS1542, 04CRS1543, 04CRS1544).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1145/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1145/2013 of 13 November 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1145/2013                     

# of 13 November 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
September 25, 2004 of Edelbrock Corporation (the Company) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, O.
Victor Edelbrock, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d));
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. November 19, 2004
    O. VICTOR EDELBROCKO. Victor EdelbrockChairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer 6
STATE of North Carolina v. Fred C. SINK.

No. 347P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

John Bryson, High Point, for Fred C. Sink.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*196*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 3rd day of July 2006 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of July 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Plaintiff v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Division of Facility Services, Defendant and North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Facility Services, Medical Facilities Planning Section, Defendant and Total Renal Care of North Carolina, LLC and Health Systems Management, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor.

No. 549A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

K. Edward Greene, Lee M. Whitman, Raleigh, Sarah M. Johnson, Winston-Salem, for Bio-Medical Applications.

Thomas R. West, Pamela A. Scott, William R. Shenton, Raleigh, for Total Renal Care.

Amy Y. Bason, Angel E. Gray, Assistant Attorney Generals, for NCDHHS.

S. Todd Hemphill, Diana E. Ricketts, Raleigh, for Health Systems Management.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 634 S.E.2d 572.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 18th day of October 2006 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiff on the 18th day of October 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."

Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Plaintiff's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RAGEN
MACKENZIE'S SEPTEMBER 24, 1999 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-24-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-24-1999
<CASH>                                           4,972
<RECEIVABLES>                                  186,137
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            315,525
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                            2,026
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            125,781
<PP&E>                                           3,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 648,534
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<PAYABLES>                                     355,878
<REPOS-SOLD>                                    38,050
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             119,255
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           135
<OTHER-SE>                                     120,511
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   648,534
<TRADING-REVENUE>                               28,789
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            35,279
<COMMISSIONS>                                   34,015
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                    6,355
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,072
<COMPENSATION>                                  41,345
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,091
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,942
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20

</TABLE>