alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                         AMENDMENT TO WARRANT AGREEMENT


     This AMENDMENT ("Amendment") to WARRANT AGREEMENT dated as of February 2,
1996 ("Warrant Agreement"), is made effective as of February 19, 1999 by and
between Edelbrock Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and RICOR
Racing and Development, L.P., a California limited partnership ("RICOR").

                                  WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Warrant Agreement, the Company issued to RICOR
warrants (the "Warrants") to purchase up to 100,000 shares of the Company's
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share; and

     WHEREAS, this Amendment is made in partial consideration for the execution
by RICOR of Amendment No. 4, dated as of even date herewith ("Amendment No. 4"),
of that certain License Agreement dated February 2, 1996 by and between the
Company and RICOR.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the agreements herein
set forth and in Amendment No. 4 and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

     1.   Vesting of Warrant Shares. Upon the execution of Amendment No. 4 by
Company and RICOR and the approval of the execution by RICOR of Amendment No. 4
by RICOR's limited partners, the vesting schedule of the Warrants set forth in
the Warrant Agreement will accelerate and the warrants will be fully
exercisable and will be Vested Shares.

     2.   Definitions. Except as otherwise set forth herein, all defined terms
as used herein shall have the same meanings as in the Warrant Agreement.

     3.   Effect of Amendment. Except as otherwise modified hereby, the terms
of the Warrant Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     4.   Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of
counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes be deemed to
be an original and such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the
same instrument.




                                       1
<PAGE>   2
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have cause this Amendment to be
duly executed, as of the day and year first above written.


[SEAL]                             EDELBROCK CORPORATION



                                   By: /s/ VICTOR EDELBROCK
                                       -------------------------
                                       Name:  Victor Edelbrock
                                       Title: President



Attest:


/s/ SIGNATURE
--------------------
Name:
Title: Secretary



                                   RICOR RACING AND DEVELOPMENT, L.P.

                                   By: RICOR, Inc., its General Partner


                                   By: /s/ DON RICHARDSON
                                       ----------------------------
                                       Name:  Don Richardson
                                       Title: President




                                       2
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D. C. 20549
 FORM
10-Q/A
 (Amendment No. 1)
 þ
    
    Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2008.
 o
    
    Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 For the transition period from  to
 Commission File Number 0-24948
 PVF Capital Corp.
  Ohio
    
    34-1659805(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)30000 Aurora Road, Solon, Ohio
    
    44139(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 
 
  þ o
  Large accelerated filer o
    
    Accelerated filer þ
    
    Non-accelerated filer o
    
    Smaller reporting company
þ(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  o þ
  Common Stock, $0.01 Par Value
    
    7,773,823(Class)
    
    (Outstanding at February 6, 2009)




---



##### 



EXPLANATORY
NOTE
  Part
II. Other Information
 Exhibits
  10.1
    
    Amended and Restated Severance Agreement among PVF Capital Corp.,
Park View Federal Savings Bank and John R. Male * (1)10.2
    
    Amended and Restated Severance Agreement among PVF Capital Corp.,
Park View Federal Savings Bank and Jeffrey N. Male * (1)10.3
    
    Amended and Restated Severance Agreement among PVF Capital Corp.,
Park View Federal Savings Bank and Edward B. Debevec * (1)10.4
    
    Letter Agreement among PVF Capital Corp., ParkView Federal
Savings Bank and John R. Male,
dated January 29, 2009*31.1
    
    Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer31.2
    
    Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer32
    
    Section 1350 Certification
 
 *
    
    Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.(1)
    
    Previously filed




---



##### 



Signature
  PVF Capital Corp.
     (Registrant)Date:  February 23, 2009
    /s/ Edward B. DebevecEdward B. DebevecTreasurer
(Only authorized officer and Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



Entity                                                     Jurisdiction of Formation
<S>                                                                    <C>
Envoy Inns of Morrisville, LLC                                      Delaware
JAGI Cleveland - Hudson, LLC                                        Delaware
JAGI Cleveland - Independence, LLC                                  Delaware
JAGI Montrose West, LLC                                             Delaware
JAGI North Canton, LLC                                              Delaware
Janus American Services Corp.                                       Delaware
Janus Cleveland - Independence, Inc.                                Delaware
Janus Hospitality I, LLC                                            Delaware
JI Subsidiary, Inc.                                                 Delaware
Kings Dominion Lodge, GP                                            Virginia
Beckelbe, Inc.                                                      Delaware
Beckelbe, Ltd.                                                        Ohio
JAGI Juno, LLC                                                      Delaware
Motel Associates of Pompano Beach, Inc.                             Florida
JAGI Pompano, LLC                                                   Delaware
JAGI Doswell, LLC                                                   Delaware

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 49515-49516]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16827]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

22 CFR Part 62

[Public Notice 5162]
RIN 1400-AC13


Secondary School Student Exchange Programs; Correction

AGENCY: State Department.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of State published a document in the Federal 
Register of August 12, 2005, (70 FR 47152) concerning a proposed rule 
on regulations for secondary school students in the Exchange Visitor 
Program set forth at 22 CFR 62.25. The document contained omitted 
information regarding the requirements of criminal background checks on 
all program sponsor officers, employees, representatives, agents, and 
volunteers under paragraph (d)(1) and student orientation requirements 
under paragraph (g)(1).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley S. Colvin, Office of Exchange 
Coordination, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of 
State 202-203-5029; Fax 202-203-5087.

PART 62--[CORRECTED]


Sec.  62.25  [Corrected]

Corrections

    1. In the Federal Register of August 12, 2005, 70 FR 47152, Public 
Notice 5155, correct Sec.  62.25(d)(1) and (g)(1) to read as follows:


Sec.  62.25  Secondary school students.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) Are adequately trained and supervised and have successfully 
completed a criminal background check;
* * * * *

[[Page 49516]]

    (g) * * *
    (1) A written summary of all operating procedures, rules, and 
regulations governing student participation in the exchange visitor 
program including information regarding the reporting of all instances 
of alleged sexual abuse or exploitation.
* * * * *

    Dated: August 15, 2005.
Stanley S. Colvin,
Director, Acting, Office of Exchange Coordination, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 05-16827 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
# The Rates (Unoccupied Hereditaments) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2013 No. 47

Rates

# The Rates (Unoccupied Hereditaments) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

6th March 2013

Coming into operation

1st April 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.4.2014) by The Rates (Unoccupied Hereditaments) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2014 (S.R. 2014/69), regs. 1, **3**
STATE v. SANDERS.

No. COA06-783.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Harnett (05CRS57099).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
STATE v. Robert Lee HOLMES.

No. 641P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Allison Corum, Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney Generals, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of February 2007 by Defendant to Strike State's Response:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of March 2007."
STATE v. DAVIS

No. COA06-766.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS61612).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
Exhibit 4.2      CONSENT OF TRACY ARMSTRONG   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 29, 2012 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I participated, as an independent Qualified Person (as such term is defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101  Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), in the preparation of an independent technical study, completed in 2009 (the Technical Study) concerning mineralized material in the Coulon property for the Company. Portions of the Technical Study are summarized under the heading Item III  Description of the Business  Coulon Property  3.1.5 Exploration and Drilling in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 29, 2012 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,    /s/  Tracy ArmstrongName:  Tracy Armstrong, P.Geo.      May 14, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.02



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying periodic report of Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Brian Peay, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: February 27, 2006 |  | /s/ Brian Peay                       
|                        |  | Brian Peay                           
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|                        |  | Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
# C_2014101EN.01002001.xml

| 5.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 101/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 101/20

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision of 9 December 2013 amending Decision 2010/206/EU appointing the members of the group for technical advice on organic production and drawing up the pool list

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 360 of 10 December 2013
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 360 of 10 December 2013

(2014/C 101/10)

On the cover, in the table of contents, and on page 13, in the title, in recitals 1, 2, 4 and 5, in Article 1 and in footnote 2:

for:

‘Decision 2010/206/EU’,

read:

‘Decision 2010/C 262/03’.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Tywaine Sherell DENNY.

No. 572PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2006.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

Jarvis John Edgerton, IV, for Denny.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 635 S.E.2d 438.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 6th day of November 2006 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of December 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of November 2006 by Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of December 2006."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
#### In the Matter of Foreclosure of Tax Liens. City of Newburgh, Respondent; Adam Quinn, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 904]

*556In a proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 11 to foreclose tax liens, Adam Quinn appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated March 4, 2004, which denied his motion to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated November 5, 2002.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the City of Newburgh’s mailing of notice of tax foreclosure proceedings by certified mail, return receipt requested to the appellant, instead of by “certified mail,” as required by Real Property Tax Law § 1125 (1) (a), did not render the foreclosure proceedings defective. Moreover, the City satisfied due process by affording the appellant notice that was reasonably calculated to apprise him of the existence of the foreclosure action *(see Kennedy v Mossafa,*100 NY2d 1, 9 [2003]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Lifson, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01
 
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-31115, 333-38833 and 333-60037) pertaining to the 1996
Incentive Stock Option Plan, 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan No. 2, 1997
Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 1997 Equity Incentive Plan of At Home
Corporation of our report dated January 19, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of At Home Corporation included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.
 
                                                               /s/ Ernst & Young
San Jose, California
February 19, 1999
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 164 (Thursday, August 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16875]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Flight 93 National Memorial Advisory Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service.

ACTION: Notice of September 7, 2005 meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the date of the September 7, 2005 
meeting of the Flight 93 Advisory Commission.

DATES: The public meeting of the Advisory Commission will be held on 
September 7, 2005 from 11 a.m. to 12 noon.
    Location: The meeting will be held in the Hall of Flags at the U.S. 
Chamber of Commerce Building, 1615 H Street, NW., Washington, DC 20062-
2000.
    Agenda: The September 7, 2005 meeting will consist of:
    (1) Opening of Meeting and Pledge of Allegiance.
    (2) Review and Approval of Minutes from July 25, 2005.
    (3) Reports from the Flight 93 Memorial Task Force design Oversight 
Committee on the Recommendation of a Final Design for the permanent 
memorial for Flight 93.
    (4) Old Business/New Business.
    (5) Public Comments.
    (6) Closing Remarks.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joanne M. Hanley, Superintendent, 
Flight 93 National Memorial, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 15501, 
(814) 443-4557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting will be open to the public. Any 
member of the public may file with the Commission a written statement 
concerning agenda items. The statement should be addressed to the 
Flight 93 Advisory Commission, 109 West Main Street, Somerset, PA 
15501.

    Dated: August 4, 2005.
Joanne M. Hanley,
Superintendent, Flight 93 National Memorial.
[FR Doc. 05-16875 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-70-M
BENSON BUILDING SUPPLY, INC. v. CREECH

No. COA06-696

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Johnston (04CVS2771).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibt 10.3


 


 


 








RESIGNATION

















To the Board of Directors of


Accelerated Acquisitions XIX, Inc.


a Delaware corporation







The undersigned, being an officer and director of the above-named corporation, does hereby resign from President, Secretary, Treasurer, and shall remain a director of the corporation.







Said resignation is contingent and expressly conditioned upon (a) the sale of 23,500,000 shares of the Company's common shares to Amonra Omnia Inc. and (b) the appointment of successor directors and officers of the corporation. 







Said resignation shall be effective on the date of the Closing of the transaction contemplated by the Subscription Agreements between the Company and Amonra Omnia Inc. and, if the filing of an Information Statement pursuant to Section 14(F) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 14F-1 promulgated thereunder ("Schedule 14F") is required to be filed, then ten days following the mailing of the Schedule 14F to the Company's stockholders.







Dated as of July 18, 2016


 



	 	
/s/ Timothy Neher


	 	
Timothy Neher
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. WAYNE JAMES, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 160 EAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 12th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
STATE v. GILLIAM.

No. COA06-951.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Henderson (05CRS58566, 05CRS58567, 05CRS58568, 05CRS58569, 05CRS58570, 05CRS58585).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed.
#### In the Matter of Howard Hughes, Appellant, v New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 854]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered December 8, 2004 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release.

Petitioner is serving an aggregate prison sentence of 25 years to life for his conviction of, among other things, murder in the *1177second degree. He is also serving a separate but concurrent prison sentence of 4 to 8 years for his conviction of robbery in the second degree. Petitioner made his initial appearance before the Board of Parole in October 2003 and his request for parole release was denied. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge that determination. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

Petitioner contends that, in citing his prior criminal history as a reason for its denial of his request for parole release, the Board incorrectly referred to his prior youthful offender adjudication *(see*CPL 720.20) as a felony conviction. Inasmuch as a youthful offender adjudication “is not a judgment of conviction for a crime or any other offense” (CPL 720.35 [1]; *see People v Adams,*281 AD2d 707, 707-708 [2001]), we reverse the judgment and order a new hearing *(see Matter of Plevy v Travis,*17 AD3d 879 [2005]; *Matter of Lewis v Travis,*9 AD3d 800 [2004]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions need not be addressed in light of this disposition.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, determination annulled and matter remitted to the Board of Parole for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision.
* Dis trict Judge of the Southern District of Texas, sitting

by designation.

* * Pursu ant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 97-50053

In the matter of: H.B. Halbert, Jr., M.D., Debtor.

H. B. HALBERT, Jr., M.D.,

Appellant,

VERSUS

ANNE W. HALBERT,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Western District of Texas

(W-96-CA-239)

October 7, 1997

Before DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges, and ROSENTHAL *

, District

Judge.

PER CURIAM: **

Appellant H.B. Halbert, Jr., M.D., clai ms on appeal to this

court that the district court erred in affirming the judgment of

the bankruptcy court. Appellant filed a complaint in bankruptcycourt seeking a determination that debts in favor of Appellee Anne

W. Halbert ar ising out of a Final Decree of Divorce were nondischargeable. The bankruptcy court held that (1) there was a

binding and enforceable contractual agreement to pay alimony, (2)

the state court judgment incorporating the alimony agreement was

not subject to collateral attack, a nd (3) payments due Appellee

Anne W. Halbert were alimony and support in nature and therefore a

non-dischargeable debt. The district court affirmed.

After considering the oral arguments of counsel, the briefs of

the parties, and the record in this case, w e conclude that the

district court judgment is correct. Accordingly, the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.