alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            65,579
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       1,479
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  74,659
<CASH>                                           3,685
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   3
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,814
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                              4,741
<POLICY-OTHER>                                  48,862
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  9,159
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,814
<PREMIUMS>                                       6,914
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              4,004
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 482
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     838
<BENEFITS>                                       5,029
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      2,037
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               945
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,132
<INCOME-TAX>                                       392
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                740
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       740
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    120.1
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    120.1
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  47,035
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              6,619
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (1,590)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               1,954
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                10,645
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 39,349
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Minco Mining & Metals Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                      
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.





Date:

July 5, 2006







Ken Z. Cai

Ken Z. Cai

President
# Council Decision of 16 December 2013 appointing three Belgian members of the Committee of the Regions (2013/810/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 16 December 2013

# appointing three Belgian members of the Committee of the Regions

# (2013/810/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU and 2010/29/EU appointing the members                              and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015(1).

(2)Three members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr Xavier                              DESGAIN, Mr Jean-François ISTASSE and Mr Michel LEBRUN.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed as members to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 25 January 2015:                  
          -  Mr Xavier DESGAIN, *Conseiller communal à Charleroi*                          
          -  Mr Jean-François ISTASSE, *Conseiller communal à Verviers*                          
          -  Mr Michel LEBRUN, *Conseiller communal à Viroinval*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

V. Jukna                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22 and OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gerald Porter Strong, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of this period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: November 12, 2004



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ GERALD PORTER STRONG             
|Name:  |  | Gerald Porter Strong                 
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
STATE v. CORDRAY.

No. COA05-759.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. No error.
TYRONE WOODSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5630

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 21, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James O. Shelfer, Judge.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, 

Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee. Tyrone Woodson, pro se, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence in all respects but 

one. We reverse the imposition of a $1,050 fine and a $52.50 surcharge, neither of 
2

which was pronounced at the sentencing hearing. See Nix v. State, 84 So. 3d 424 

(Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Williams v. State, 82 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). As in 

Nix, “[o]n remand, the trial court may reimpose the fine and surcharge after 

providing notice to Appellant and following the proper procedure.” 84 So. 3d at 426.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.

ROBERTS, C.J., and JAY and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
MALONE v. DEAN.

No. COA05-1426.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 1, 2006.

Certification Date August 21, 2006.

Appeal from Franklin (04CVS 1048).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLICACCOUNTANTS**
     We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe Registration Statements on Form S-3 FileNo. 333-37789, Form S-4 File No. 333-28951,Form S-4 File No. 333-23135, Form S-3 FileNo. 333-53099, Form S-3 File No 333-72611,Form S-8 File No. 333-22689, Form S-8 FileNo. 333-41341 and Form S-8 File No. 333-92227 ofBoca Resorts, Inc. of our report dated August 22, 2003,with respect to the consolidated financial statements of BocaResorts, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the year ended June 30, 2003.
 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP    
Miami, Florida,September 23, 2003
Sandra ROSE, Employee, Plaintiff v. CITY OF ROCKY MOUNT, Self-Insured Employer, Compensation Claims Solutions, Administrator, Defendants.

No. 17P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina, Tenth District.

March 8, 2007.

Matthew P. Blake, Ginny P. Lanier, Cary, for City of Rocky Mount.

Paul N. Blake, Wilson, Albert S. Thomas, Jr., for Rose.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of January 2007 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Beverage Corporation (the " Company") for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Carmine N. Stella, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: April 13, 2010
/s/ Carmine N. StellaName: Carmine N. StellaTitle: Chief Executive Officer





In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Beverage Corporation (the " Company") for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Carol Russell, hereby certify in my capacity as Treasurer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: April 13, 2010
/s/ Carmine N. StellaName: Carmine N. StellaTitle: Principal Accounting Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 1, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00222

- CV

Zenobia Joseph , Appellant

v.

Hilltop Residential Bristol Heights , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgm ent signed by the tr i a l court on April 4, 2023 . Having reviewed

the record , the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted her appeal and did not comply

with a notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. Therefore, the Court dismisses the appeal for want

of prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.01
                                 -------------

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

ERF WIRELESS, INC.

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated April 11, 2005,
except for the matters described in Note 1 under the heading - "Basic Loss Per
Share" (Restated), as to which the date is August 26, 2005, relating to the
consolidated financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-KSB/A.

We consent to all references to our firm in this Form 10-KSB/A.



                   /S/ LOPEZ, BLEVINS, BORK & ASSOCIATES, LLP
                   ------------------------------------------



LOPEZ, BLEVINS, BORK & ASSOCIATES

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Houston, Texas

October 14, 2005
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 422/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 422/2013 of 7 May 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Fin Gras / Fin Gras du Mézenc (PDO)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 422/2013                     

# of 7 May 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Fin Gras / Fin                        Gras du Mézenc (PDO)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 entered into force on 3 January                              2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications                              and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs(2).

(2)Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Fin Gras’ / ‘Fin Gras                              du Mézenc’ was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name                              should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.1.****Fresh meat (and offal)**U.K.

#### FRANCEU.K.

Fin Gras / Fin Gras du Mézenc (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.                           

3

OJ C 180, 21.6.2012, p. 22.
# L_2013143EN.01000101.xml

| 30.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 143/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 143/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 494/2013

of 29 May 2013

implementing Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 of 18 May 2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (1), and in particular Article 8a(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 May 2006, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 765/2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 May 2006, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.

| (2) | The Council considers that one person and two entities should be removed from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Council considers that one person and two entities should be removed from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures as set out in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006.

| (3) | Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 is hereby amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 May 2013.

For the Council

The President

R. BRUTON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 134, 20.5.2006, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

The following person and entities are deleted from Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 765/2006:

| (1) | Person
  Shadryna, Hanna Stanislavauna |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Person

Shadryna, Hanna Stanislavauna

| (2) | Entities






  (a) | The Spirit and Vodka Company Aquadiv |
| --- | --- | --- |

(2)

Entities

(a)

The Spirit and Vodka Company Aquadiv

| (b) | Sport-Pari |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Sport-Pari

---
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

SENIA V. EDWARDS,
Petitioner

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent

______________________

2022

- 2245

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
Board in No. CH

- 844E

- 17

- 0332

- I

- 1.

______________________

Before L OURIE

, P ROST , and W ALLACH

, Circuit Judges

.
P ER C URIAM

.
O R D E R

In response to this court’s November 28, 2022, order to show cause, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)urges dismissal of this petition for review as untimely. Senia V. Edwards has not responded.

OPM denied Ms. Edwards ’ application for disability retirement benefits. Ms. Edwards appealed to the Merit Systems Protection Board, which affirmed OPM’s denial in a Case: 22-2245 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 03/27/2023EDWARDS v. OPM 2

final decision dated May 16, 2022. 1 This court received Ms. Edwards’ petition on September 14, 2022

. 2

The timely filing of a petition fro m a Board decision is a jurisdictional requirement “and not subject to equitable tolling.” See Fedora v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. , 848 F.3d 1013,

101 5 (Fed. Cir. 2017). A petition from a final decision “shall be filed within 60 days after the Board issues no tice
of the final order or decision of the Board.” 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A). Here, Ms. Edward s ’ petition was received
outside of the 60

- day filing deadline, including over 60 days after the Board’s July 8, 2022, letter with the courtesy copy
of the decision. W e therefore must dismiss.

Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The petition for review is dismissed.

1 On July 7, 2022, the Board was informed that its
decision mailed to Ms. Edwards was returned undeliverable. In a letter dated July 8, 2022, the Board informed Ms.
Edwards of its efforts to contact her and included a courtesy copy of the May 16, 2022, fina l decision.

2 Although Ms. Edwards’ filings before this court indicated that she raised a discrimination claim at the Board, OPM responds without contradiction that Ms. Edwards did
not raise a claim at the Board that OPM’s benefits decision
was based on discrimination. See ECF No. 10

- 1 at 6

– 7. Case: 22-2245 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 03/27/2023EDWARDS v. OPM 3

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

March 27 , 2023
Date F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 22-2245 Document: 12 Page: 3 Filed: 03/27/2023