alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 164 (Thursday, August 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49923]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16857]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuances

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984, as 
amended by the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 1998 (46 U.S.C. app. 1718) 
and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of 
Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
     License No.            Name/address              Date reissued
------------------------------------------------------------------------
007699N.............  Caribbean American        June 16, 2005.
                       Freight, Inc., 9393
                       NW., 13th Street,
                       Miami, FL 33172.
001278F.............  Interproject Shipping     July 1, 2005.
                       Services, Inc., 10
                       Exchange Place, 19th
                       Floor, Jersey City, NJ
                       07302.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 05-16857 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Thomas Henry MYERS and Jesse Warren Coleman.

No. 660PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 17, 2006.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 174 N.C.App. 526, 621 S.E.2d 329 (2005), affirming orders entered 20 November 2003 by Judge Robert F. Floyd, Jr., in Superior Court, Cumberland County. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 October 2006.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Daniel K. Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee Myers; and Brian Michael Aus for defendant-appellee Coleman.

*566PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed, and this case is remanded to that court for reconsideration on the issue of sufficiency of the evidence in light of *State v. Childress,*321 N.C. 226, 362 S.E.2d 263 (1987).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 987/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 987/2013 of 14 October 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications (Fenland Celery (PGI))         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 987/2013                     

# of 14 October 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Fenland Celery                        (PGI))                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection                              of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs(2).

(2)Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Fenland Celery’                              was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Fenland Celery’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.6.****Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed**U.K.

#### UNITED KINGDOMU.K.

Fenland Celery (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.                           

3

OJ C 353, 17.11.2012, p. 9.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2

              Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-19477) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan of
ProsoftTraining.com (formerly known as Prosoft I-Net Solutions, Inc.) of our
report dated October 24, 1997, included in the annual report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended July 31, 1999, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet
of ProsoftTraining.com as of July 31, 1997 (not presented separately therein),
and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity,
and cash flows for the year ended July 31, 1997.

                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Orange County, California
October 27, 1999
Order entered October 13, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00459-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.E.W., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-56270-2011

ORDER

In light of appellee’s October 13, 2014 letter stating he is withdrawing his October 9, 

2014 unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief because he was able to timely file the 

brief, we DENY as moot appellee’s extension motion. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 9, 2005, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et. seq*. (“the Act”), Storage Bridge Bay Working Group, Inc. (“SBB”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing (1) the name and principal place of business of the standards development organization and (2) the nature and scope of its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.                

Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the name and principal place of business of the Standards development organization is: Storage Bridge Bay Working Group, Inc., Redwood City, CA. The nature and scope of SBB's standards development activities are: Promoting the computer industry by supporting and facilitating the development of interoperable and compatible storage components with reference to controller slot compatibility between and among storage solutions. These purposes include the objective of developing and publishing a “storage bridge bay” specification that will serve as a reference and guideline for defining physical, mechanical, electrical and low-level enclosure management requirements for an enclosure controller slot that will support a variety of storage controllers from a variety of independent hardware vendors and independent software vendors. Any storage controller design based on this specification shall be able to fit, connect, and operate within any storage enclosure controller slot design based on the same specification.

Dorothy B. Fountain,

Deputy Director of Operations Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 05-16959  Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 968/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 968/2013 of 9 October 2013 fixing an acceptance percentage for the issuing of export            licences, rejecting export-licence applications and suspending the lodging of export-licence applications for out-of-quota            sugar (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 968/2013                     

# of 9 October 2013

# fixing an acceptance percentage for the issuing of export licences, rejecting export-licence applications and suspending the                        lodging of export-licence applications for out-of-quota sugar (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1221/2013 of 29 November 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 476/2013                                 fixing the quantitative limit for the exports of out-of-quota sugar until the end of the 2013/2014 marketing year and repealing                                 Implementing Regulation (EU) No 968/2013.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41851]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14865]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17503 and #17504; MISSISSIPPI Disaster Number 
MS-00145]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of 
Mississippi

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Mississippi dated 07/06/2022.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-Line Winds, and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 03/30/2022.

DATES: Issued on 07/06/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/06/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/06/2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Wayne.
Contiguous Counties:
    Mississippi: Clarke, Greene, Jasper, Jones, Perry.
    Alabama: Choctaw, Washington.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      2.875
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.438
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.880
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.940
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      2.940
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17503 B 
and for economic injury is 17504 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Alabama, 
Mississippi.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-14865 Filed 7-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Madeline BECKER, John Yahn, David Becker, and John Becker v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES.

No. 295P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2006.

Branch Vincent, III, Southern Shores, for Madeline Becker, et al.

Dahr J. Tanoury, Assistant Attorney General, for NCDMV.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 628 S.E.2d 446.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of June 2006 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of December 2006."
# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 363/2013Show full title

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 363/2013 of 22 April 2013 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive            measures in view of the situation in Syria         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 363/2013                     

# of 22 April 2013

# implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation                           in Syria(1), and in particular Article 32(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 18 January 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.

(2)In accordance with Council Implementing Decision 2013/185/CFSP of 22 April 2013 implementing Decision 2012/739/CFSP concerning                              restrictive measures against Syria(2), the Council considers that a person should be removed from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures                              as set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.

(3)Further the entries for the persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Regulation                              (EU) No 36/2012 should be updated and amended.

(4)Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 should be updated accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex II to Regulation (EU) 36/2012 shall be replaced by the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

## ANNEXU.K.

### ‘ANNEX IIU.K.**List of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies referred to in Articles 14 and 15(1)(a)**

#### [X1A.

#### **Persons**

#### B.

#### **Entities**

Editorial Information

X1Substituted by Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 363/2013 of 22 April 2013 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning                                 restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria (Official Journal of the European Union L 111 of 23 April 2013).

1

OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p. 77.
STATE v. MONROY.

No. COA05-991.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Davidson (03CRS58359)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,847
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                       247
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          80,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,736
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,152
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,159
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,569
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  46
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,196)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,196)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,196)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



Certification



Each of the undersigned officers of Allin Corporation (the Company), certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Companys report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 25, 2005 |  | /s/ Richard W. Talarico
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer



|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|March 25, 2005 |  | /s/ Dean C. Praskach   
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    /s/ James C. MastandreaJames C. MastandreaChairman of the Board, Chief Executive
    Officer and President
    (Principal Executive Officer)