alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency. 

# ACTION:

Notice; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Environmental Protection Agency published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of July 16, 2005, concerning a request for comments on an information collection request regarding the assessment of indoor air quality outreach products and services. The document contained an incorrect date.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

John M Hall, 202-343-9453. 

## Correction 

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of July 16, 2005, in FR Doc. 05-16221, on page 48130, in the first column, correct the                         **DATE**                         caption to read:                     

# DATES:

Comments must be submitted on or before October 15, 2005. 

Dated: July 18, 2005. 

Thomas E. Kelly, 

Director, Indoor Environments Division, Environmental Protection Agency. 

[FR Doc. 05-16934 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3h 
 [Bank of America Letterhead] 
  
 August 3, 2005 
  
 Via Telecopy: 813.254.9640 

 
 Kforce Inc. 
 1001 East Palm Avenue 
 4th Floor 
 Tampa, Florida 33605 
 Attention: William L. Sanders 
  

	 	Re:	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Credit 

 Agreement”), dated as of November 3, 2000, among Kforce, Inc. (the 
 “Borrower”), certain of
its affiliates, and Bank of America, N.A. (the 
 “Agent”), as agent for itself and certain financial institutions party thereto.

  
 Mr. Sanders: 
  
 Reference is hereby made to the Credit Agreement. All capitalized terms used
herein, unless otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Credit Agreement. 
  
 Effective June 30, 2005, clause (c)(ii) of Section 7.13 of the Credit Agreement shall be deemed amended and restated to provide as follows: “(ii) the
aggregate amount of such Debt (including Capital Leases) outstanding does not exceed $10,000,000 at any time.” 
  
 Also effective June 30, 2005, Section 7.22 of the Credit Agreement shall be deemed amended and restated to provide as follows: 
  
 7.22 Capital Expenditures. No Credit Party shall make or
incur any Capital Expenditure if, after giving effect thereto, the aggregate amount of all Capital Expenditures by the Borrower and its Subsidiaries on a consolidate basis would exceed $11,000,000 during any Fiscal Year. 
  
 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 







 Except as expressly provided hereinabove, the Credit Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to be or operate as a waiver of or consent to any Event of Default. 
  

			
	 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as
 Administrative Agent and a Lender

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark Herdman

	 Name:
	 	 Mark Herdman

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President



  
 [Signatures
continued on following page] 








			
	 Agreed:
  
 THE CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kathy Le

	 Name:
	 	 Kathy Le

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President



  
 [Signatures
continued on following page] 








			
	 Accepted and agreed:
  
 KFORCE INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ W. L. Sanders

	 Title:
	 	 President
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 29, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00126

- CR

Albino CEDILLO

, App ellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 63rd Judicial District Court

, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- 0019

- CR Honorable Steve Hilbig , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief is currently due by August 4, 2022. On July 26, 2022, appellant filed a motion requesting a thirty

- day extension of time. After consideration, we grant the motion and

order appellant to file the brief by September 6, 2022. Counsel is advised further extensions of time will be disfavored absent extraordinary circumstances.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of July, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted December 19, 2008 ∗

Decided January 5, 2009



### Before

F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK

, Chief Judge

R ICHARD A. P OSNER

, Circuit Judge

T ERENCE T. E VANS

, Circuit Judge



### No

. 07

- 3295

U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA

, Plaintiff

- Appellee

,

v.

D AVID E. M ALONE

, Defendant

- Appellant

. Appeal from the United

States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

No. 05 CR 107

Elaine E. Bu cklo, Judge

.

Order

We vacated Malone’ s conviction for money laundering and remanded so that the

district court could consid er whether this affected Malone’ s sentence on the remaining

counts. United States v. Malone , 484 F.3d 916 (7th Cir. 2007). The district court held that it

∗ This successive appeal has been submitted to the original p anel under Operating Procedure 6(b). After

examining the briefs and the record, we have concluded that oral argument is unnecessary. See Fed. R.

App. P. 34(a); Cir. R. 34(f). NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited on ly in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 07

- 3295 Page 2

does not and left all of the remaining sentences in place.

Malone contends, in this successive appeal, that the judge violated the Due

Process Clause by resentencing him without a hearing at which he could provide

evidence of his rehabilitation while in prison. There are two problems with this

argument. First, it was waived. The district judge asked Malone whether he wanted a

hearing; Malone replied that he did not. Second, the judge did not “resentence” Malone.

The judge set aside the sentence on the vacated count and left the remaining sentences

as is. A conclusion that a sentence imposed in 2006 should not be disturbed in 2008 does

not require a hearing.

A FFIRMED
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Joel CUPID.

No. 107P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Daniel Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Kenneth Joel Cupid.

Kathleen M. Waylett, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 1st day of March 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st day of March 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







Certification
      of CEO




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of KH Funding Company (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Harris,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:
                August 14, 2006
            /s/
                Robert L. HarrisRobert
                L. HarrisPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.




This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
      by
      such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to
      the
      extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
IN RE D.J.R.

COA06-22.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Harnett (04J34, 04J35).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-11-00786-CR

MICKEY BOSWELL

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On appeal from the

319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 10-CR-4228-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

September 24, 2015.
STATE v. TALLEY.

No. COA05-1358.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Yadkin (03CRS2054, 03CRS2055, 03CRS2056, 03CRS2057, 03CRS2058, 03CRS2059, 03CRS2060)

Case without published opinion. No error.
In the Matter of C.D.A.W., a minor child.

No. 110A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 9, 2007.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 175 N.C.App. 680, 625 S.E.2d 139 (2006), affirming an order entered 20 July 2004 by Judge Susan E. Bray in District Court, Guilford County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 February 2007.

Guilford County Attorney's Office, by James A. Dickens, Deputy County Attorney, for petitioner-appellee Guilford County Department of Social Services.

Joyce L. Terres, High Piont, for appellee Guardian ad Litem.

Carlton, Rhodes, & Carlton, by Gary C. Rhodes, Salisbury, for respondent-appellant mother.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of Commission public business meeting.

# DATES:

Friday, July 22, 2022, 12:00 p.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Meeting to take place virtually and is open to the public via livestream on the Commission's YouTube page:                         *https://www.youtube.com/​user/​USCCR/​videos.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Angelia Rorison: 202-376-8371;                         *publicaffairs@usccr.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the Government in Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month. This business meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in English) on Friday, July 22, 2022, is                     *https://www.streamtext.net/​player?​event=​USCCR.*                     Please note that CART is text-only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.                

## Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Business Meeting

A. Presentations by State Advisory Committee Chairs on Released Reports and Memorandums

B. Discussion and Vote on Advisory Committee Appointments

C. Discussion and Vote on 2023 and 2024 Topics for USCCR Reports

D. Management and Operations
    - Staff Director's Report

III. Adjourn Meeting

Dated: July 13, 2022.

Angelia Rorison,

USCCR Media and Communications Director.

[FR Doc. 2022-15240 Filed 7-13-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
26 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Northrop Grumman $3.8 B

Centene Corp. $3.0 B

General Atomic Technologies $2.7 B

McKesson $2.7 B

Lockheed Martin $2.6 B

Boeing $1.9 B

Raytheon $1.7 B

General Dynamics $1.4 B

Aerospace Corp. $965.4 M

L3 Technologies $698.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

CALIFORNIA

#1 #26 11.5% $1,459 #1 #1 #2

$57.7 B SPENT

IN STATE

1.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $42.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

272,728 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$15.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$15.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

272,728

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

San Diego 76,592 23,805 877 8,739 110,013

San Bernardino 13,844 3,339 572 505 18,260

Los Angeles 2,010 3,535 3,176 4,319 13,040

Ventura 4,539 5,707 987 1,321 12,554

Solano 6,538 1,611 284 3,564 11,997

Kern 2,537 8,322 313 305 11,477

Riverside 365 2,659 1,487 5,060 9,571

Monterey 4,607 4,062 93 389 9,151

Kings 6,204 821 ND 489

Orange 447 1,133 1,996 3,385 6,961

Construction: 3% Research and 

Development: 12%

Service: 41%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 44%

Active Duty: 56%

Civilian: 23%

National 

Guard: 7%

Reserve: 14%

12%

38%

26%

25%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

17%

66%

15%

2%

$40.8 $40.8

$34.2 $33.0 $31.5

$36.2 $36.6

$42.5

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 27

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Yolo

Sacramento Alameda

Santa Clara

Kern

San Bernardino

Ventura

Orange

Los Angeles

CALIFORNIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

San Diego

Los Angeles

Sacramento

Orange

Santa Clara

Yolo

Ventura

Alameda

San Bernardino

Kern

(M = millions, B = billions)

$11.1 B

$9.5 B

$4.2 B

$4.0 B

$3.6 B

$2.7 B

$1.2 B

$848.8 M

$765.8 M

$739.0 M

Yuba

Solano

Monterey

Kings

Kern San Bernardino

Riverside

San Diego

San Diego

Kern

Ventura

San Bernardino

Monterey

Solano

Los Angeles

Kings

Riverside

Yuba

$6.2 B

$904.1 M

$880.2 M

$796.6 M

$681.5 M

$667.8 M

$660.8 M

$413.4 M

$384.6 M

$335.0 M

Los Angeles

San Diego

Ventura
#### In the Matter of Luis Dulanto, Petitioner, v Joseph J. Nicoletti, Jr., as Commissioner of the White Plains Department of Public Works, et al., Respondents.

[800 NYS2d 588]

*554Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Joseph J. Nicoletti, Jr., as Commissioner of the White Plains Department of Public Works, dated February 3, 2004, which, upon adopting in part and rejecting in part the recommendations of a hearing officer, found the petitioner guilty of charge I, specification 1, charge II, specification 1, and charge III, specification 1, and terminated his employment as a motor equipment operator.

Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, without costs or disbursements, to the extent that so much of the determination as found the petitioner guilty of charge I, specification I, and charge III, specification 1, is annulled, those specifications are dismissed, the penalty of termination is vacated, the petitioner is reinstated to his position as motor equipment operator, the determination is otherwise confirmed, and the proceeding is otherwise dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the respondent Joseph J. Nicoletti, Jr., as Commissioner of the White Plains Department of Public Works, for the calculation of back pay and benefits, if any, to which the petitioner may be entitled, and the imposition of a penalty with respect to charge II, specification 1.

The determination of the respondent Joseph J. Nicoletti, Jr., as Commissioner of the White Plains Department of Public Works, that the petitioner was guilty of threatening a coworker with physical injury by throwing a shovel in his direction following a verbal dispute between the two men is not supported by substantial evidence *(see*CPLR 7803 [4]; *People ex rel. Vega v Smith,*66 NY2d 130, 139 [1985]; *300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 180 [1978]). While the petitioner’s method of returning the coworker’s shovel was careless and inappropriate, the record does not establish that his act was intended as a threat or could be viewed by a reasonable person as a threat.

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination. Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Cozier and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
AMENDMENT
NO 2 to LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT


 


THIS
AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”), is entered into with effect as of the 31st day of March 2016 (the “Effective
Date”), is intended to amend the Line of Credit Agreement dated as of September 30, 2014 (the “Agreement”),
by and among Vert CAPITAL CORP., a Delaware corporation, with its headquarters at 10951 West Pico, Los Angeles, CA 90064
(the “Lender”); and BOXLIGHT CORPORATION (formerly Logical Choice Corporation), a Nevada corporation (“Borrower”).


 


Recitals


 


WHEREAS,
the Agreement provided that the Lender would provide to the Borrower a line of credit of up to $500,000 (the “Line of Credit”),
and on September 30, 2015 the line was amended to provide the Borrower with a line of credit up to $750,000.


 


WHEREAS,
the Parties now wish to amend the Agreement to increase the Line of Credit to a maximum of $900,000.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, terms and conditions set forth herein, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:


 


Terms
and Conditions


 


	1.	GENERAL


 


All
terms with capital letters and not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the same meanings given to them in the Agreement.


 


	2.	AMENDMENT


 


	 	2.1.	Line
    of Credit


 


The
maximum amount of the Line of Credit is hereby increased to Nine Hundred Thousand ($900,000) Dollars. All references in the Agreement
and in the Line of Credit Documents to “Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars”, or “$750,000”, is hereby
deleted and shall be replaced with “Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars” or “$900,000”, as applicable.


 


	3.	RATIFICATION


 


Except
as specifically stated in this Amendment, the Agreement is, in all other respects, ratified and confirmed and shall continue in
full force and effect.


 


[SIGNATURE
PAGE FOLLOWS]


 




    	 		Page
1
of 2



CONFIDENTIAL AND RESTRICTED


     

    


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


	VERT CAPITAL CORP.	 	BOXLIGHT CORPORATION
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:
    	 	 	By:	 
	Name:
    	Michael
    Pope	 	Name:	Sheri
    Lofgren,
	Title:
    	Managing
    Member	 	Title:	Chief
    Financial Officer
	Date: 	As of March 31, 2016	 	Date: 	As of March 31, 2016


 




    	 		Page
2
of 2



CONFIDENTIAL AND RESTRICTED
STATE v. PLATT

No. COA06-1063

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from Forsyth (05CRS54581).

Cases reported without published opinion. Remanded for resentencing.