alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013133EN.01000501.xml

| 17.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 133/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 133/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 452/2013

of 7 May 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Eichsfelder Feldgieker/Eichsfelder Feldkieker (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Eichsfelder Feldgieker’/‘Eichsfelder Feldkieker’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Eichsfelder Feldgieker’/‘Eichsfelder Feldkieker’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 188, 28.6.2012, p. 6.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

GERMANY

Eichsfelder Feldgieker/Eichsfelder Feldkieker (PGI)

---
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________

No. 95-60621

(Summary Calendar)

_________________________

JOAN KENDALL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant

versus

OXFORD HOUSING AUTHORITY;

PHYLLIS JOHNSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________________________________________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

(3:93-CV-124)

__________________________________________________

August 1, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Joan Kendall appeals from the district court’s grant ofsummary judgment to the defendants

in her suit under the Fair Housing Act. She argues that the defendants retaliated against her for

exercising her right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment, that the defendants failed to
2

make reasonable accommodations for her handicap in violation of the Fair Housing Act, that the

defendants’ inspection of her apartment constituted an unreasonable search and seizure in violation

ofthe Fourth Amendment, and that the inspection of her apartment violated her right to privacy. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for

essentially the reasons given by the district court.
exv10w2



 





EXHIBIT 10.2




SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS




     Each director who also is not an associate of Westcorp or its subsidiaries (i.e., all of our
directors except for Ernest Rady and Thomas Wolfe) receive $5,000 for each quarterly board meeting
that they attend, $2,250 for each non-quarterly board meeting that they attend, and $1,500 for each
committee meeting that they attend that is not held in conjunction with a board meeting.
Additionally, directors receive $700 for participation in an earnings press release conference
call. Directors who are associates of Westcorp or its subsidiaries do not receive additional
compensation for their services as directors. Directors who attend a Westcorp and WFS Financial Inc
board meeting on the same day are compensated for only one of the two meetings.



     Our directors also are eligible to receive stock options and restricted stock awards on a
discretionary basis, pursuant to the terms of the Westcorp 2001 Stock Incentive Plan.



     The compensation arrangements we have with our directors are reviewed and may be modified from
time to time by our Board of Directors.
LOCKE v. GLENN.

No. COA05-1555.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 1, 2006.

Certification Date August 21, 2006.

Appeal from Randolph (04CVS1483).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Salvatore Iannuzzi, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | By: | /s/SALVATORE IANNUZZISalvatore Iannuzzi
      Chairman of the Board, President and
      Chief Executive Officer
      February 21, 2008 | 
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### Jean Fasano, Respondent, v Green-Wood Cemetery, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 827]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated November 1, 2004, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Whether a dangerous condition exists on real property so as to create liability on the part of the landowner depends on the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case and is generally a question of fact for the jury *(see Trincere v County of Suffolk,*90 NY2d 976 [1997]; *Adsmond v City of Poughkeepsie,*283 AD2d 598 [2001]; *Guerrieri v Summa,*193 AD2d 647 [1993]). The defendant failed to make a prima facie showing that the condition upon which the plaintiff tripped and fell, a difference in elevation between the landing of a concrete staircase and the adjoining walkway, which ranged up to two inches, for a length of approximately two feet, was trivial and nonactionable as a matter of law. The plaintiff’s testimony together with photographs of the defective condition as well as all other relevant factors and surrounding circumstances demonstrated that there exist triable issues of fact *(see Stachowski v City of Yonkers,*294 AD2d 489 [2002]; *Schatz v Herco, Inc.,*272 AD2d 536 [2000]; *Denmark*
      *447
      *v Wal-Mart Stores,*266 AD2d 776 [1999]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
HAMBY v. Profile PRODUCTS, et al.

No. 507A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 5, 2007.

Joseph W. Moss, Charlotte, Burley B. Mitchell, Jr., Sarah L. Buthe, Raleigh, for Profile Products.

Gregory C. York, Charlotte, for Electric Service Group, Inc.

William H. Sturges, H. Bryan Ives, III, Charlotte, William G. Scoggin, Raleigh, for NCCBI and NCAI.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of March 2007 by Plaintiffs for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiffs shall have up to and including the 9th day of March 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of March 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance  sheet of  MidAmerican  Energy  Company as of December 31,
1998, and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the
twelve  months  ended  December  31,  1998,  and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                         0000928576
<NAME>                        MidAmerican Energy Company
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,641,645
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    183,279
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         299,005
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       305,489
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 156,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,585,530
<COMMON>                                       560,656
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            411,622
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 972,278
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                    31,759
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           870,069
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 206,221
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  60,897
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,294,306
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3,585,530
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      1,707,189
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           76,042 <F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     1,426,269
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     1,426,269
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        280,920
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (361)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 280,559
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       88,924
<NET-INCOME>                                   115,593
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    4,952
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  110,641
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       124,200
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      70,193
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         381,007
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>
     INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE includes all income taxes and is excluded from Total
Operating Expenses above and on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 633/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 633/2013 of 28 June 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 633/2013                     

# of 28 June 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 June 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Order entered January 22, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01405-CV

GWENDOLYN (DILWORTH) BYARS, Appellant

V.

OTHO D. DILWORTH III, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-04374-D

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s, January 20, 2015, second motion to extend time to file 

brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant to file her brief no later than 

February 20, 2015. We caution appellant that no further extensions will be granted absent 

exigent circumstances.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
PROMISSORY NOTE
                      Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

$50,000.00                                    DATE:  January 31, 2003

FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned, jointly and severally, promise to
PAY TO THE ORDER OF:  RAM Venture Holdings Corp. THE PRINCIPAL SUM of
Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($50,000.00), together with interest
thereon at the rate of eight (8%) percent per annum until maturity, all
payable in lawful money of the United States of America, as follows:
   -  Principal due January 31, 2005
   -  Interest payable quarterly beginning June 30, 2003
   -  Note is convertible into 150,000 shares of Proguard Protection
Services, Inc. common stock at anytime prior to January 31, 2005 at the
option of RAM Venture Holdings Corp.

All payments shall apply first to accrued interest, and the remainder,
if any to reduction of principal.   If any installment or principal or
interest is not paid when due, or upon any default in the performance
of any of the covenants or agreements of this note, or of any
instrument now or hereafter evidencing or securing this note or the
obligation represented hereby, the whole indebtedness (including
principal and interest) remaining unpaid, shall, at the option of the
holder become immediately due, payable and collectible, and while in
default, this note and deferred interest shall bear interest at the
rate of twelve (12%) percent per annum.

Each maker and endorser severally waives demand, protest and notice of
maturity, non-payment or protest and all requirements necessary to hold
each of them liable as makers and endorsers.   Each maker and endorser
further agrees, jointly and severally to pay all costs of collection
including reasonable attorney fees in case it becomes necessary to
protect the security hereof whether suit be brought or not.

LENDOR:                              LENDEE:
RAM Venture Holdings Corp.            Proguard Protection Services,
Inc.

By: /s/ Norman Becker                By: /s/ Frank R. Bauer
   ------------------                    ------------------
Normal Becker, President                 Frank R. Bauer, President

                                     Sworn to and subscribed before me
                                     This 5th day of February 2003
                                     By Frank R. Bauer, who is
                                     __ Personally known to mer
                                     _x_ Produced ID   Fla. I.D.
                                     /s/Ralene Peterson
                                     -----------------------
                                     Notary Public
                                     My Commission Expires 01/17/2006

                                     SEAL
STATE of North Carolina v. Alejandro HERNANDEZ-MADRID.

No. 534PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 28, 2007.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 173 N.C.App. 234, 617 S.E.2d 724 (2005), affirming in part judgments entered 2 July 2003 by Judge W. Osmond Smith in Superior Court, Wake County, but remanding the case for resentencing after granting defendant's Motion for Appropriate Relief. Heard in the Supreme Court 8 May 2007.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Irving Joyner, Cary, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

To the extent the Court of Appeals ordered remand of defendant's case for resentencing, we reverse and remand to that court for reconsideration in light of *State v. Hurt,* 361 N.C. 325, 643 S.E.2d 915, (2007), and *State v. Blackwell,* 361 N.C. 41, 638 S.E.2d 452 (2006), *cert. denied,* ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2281, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ 75 U.S.L.W. 3609 (2007). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 165 (Friday, August 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50304-50305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16999]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EMSSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, September 14, 2005, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat Halsey, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, PO Box 2001, EM-90, 
Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576-4025; Fax (865) 576-5333 or e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d5bdb4b9a6b0aca5bf95baa7bafbb1bab0fbb2baa3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="482029243b2d31382208273a27662c272d662f273e">[email protected]</span></a> or check the Web site at http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE in the areas of environmental restoration, waste 
management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: Overview of Risk Assessment Process.
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals

[[Page 50305]]

who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the agenda item should 
contact Pat Halsey at the address or telephone number listed above. 
Requests must be received five days prior to the meeting and reasonable 
provision will be made to include the presentation in the agenda. The 
Deputy Designated Federal Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting 
in a fashion that will facilitate the orderly conduct of business. 
Individuals wishing to make public comment will be provided a maximum 
of five minutes to present their comments.
    Minutes: Minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Department of Energy's Information Center at 
475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, TN between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, or by writing to Pat Halsey, Department of Energy Oak 
Ridge Operations Office, PO Box 2001, EM-90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, or by 
calling her at (865) 576-4025.

    Issued at Washington, DC on August 22, 2005.
Carol Matthews,
Acting Advisory Committee Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-16999 Filed 8-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE v. PARTRIDGE.

No. COA05-1482.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 15, 2006.

Certification Date September 5, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (02CRS85870, 02CRS85871).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.