alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(United States Code, Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350)
Accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. for the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ RICHARD M. MCVEYRichard M. McVeyChief Executive Officer  This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT
32







CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Carol K.
Nelson, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Lars H. Johnson, Chief
Financial Officer of Cascade Financial Corporation (the "Corporation"), each
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
      Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
      (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
      Corporation.





This
certification is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is not
being filed as part of this quarterly report.








Date:
August 7, 2009








/s/ Carol K. Nelson


Carol K.
Nelson, President and CEO








/s/ Lars H. Johnson


Lars H.
Johnson, Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. Alfonzo MEEKS.

No. 248P03-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of June 2006 by Defendant for "Objection to the Recommendation of the North Carolina Court of Appeals":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of June 2006."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5589 

To modify the project for navigation, Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, 

Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana, to include an additional area, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2008 

Mr. MELANCON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To modify the project for navigation, Atchafalaya River and 

Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana, to include 

an additional area, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER AND BAYOUS CHENE, 

4 BOEUF, AND BLACK, LOUISIANA. 

5 The project for navigation, Atchafalaya River and 

6 Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana, authorized 

7 by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1968 (82 

8 Stat. 731), and modified by section 3077 of the Water 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5589 IH

1 Resources Development Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 1126), is 

2 further modified to authorize the Secretary of the Army— 

3 (1) to include as part of the project the portion 

4 of the Lower Atchafalaya River known as the 

5 ‘‘Crewboat Cut’’, located south of the convergence of 

6 Bayou Chene into the Atchafalaya River and east of 

7 the authorized part of the channel known as the 

8 ‘‘Horseshoe’’; and 

9 (2) to carry out projects for bank stabilization 

10 on the eastern shore of Crewboat Cut to prevent ero11 sion from wave action and scouring. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Douglas Shane WRIGHT.

No. 483A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Chris Z. Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Robert T. Newman, Asheboro, for Douglas S. Wright.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of September 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review *634of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 (Petition for Writ of Certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of appeals), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
STATE of North Carolina v. Xavier Dominique JOHNSON.

No. 72P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Ann B. Petersen, Chapel Hill, for Xavier Dominique Johnson.

Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*556*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of February 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
STATE v. AIKEN.

No. COA06-8.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Rockingham (04CRS52271).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Shawn Christopher PORTER.

No. 341P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Keischa M. Lovelace, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Porter.

*195Sharon Patrick-Wilson, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th day of June 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Molecular and Cellular Aspects of Obesity and Metabolic Disease.                              ( print page 42491)    

*Date:*                         July 26, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Raul Rojas, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6185, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-6319,                         *rojasr@mail.nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 12, 2022.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst,Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-15171 Filed 7-14-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Business Objects S.A. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of
Operations and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          37,912
<SECURITIES>                                    25,982
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,681
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,772
<INVENTORY>                                        523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,889
<PP&E>                                          24,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,491
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,480
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,128
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,660
<SALES>                                         41,257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,257
<CGS>                                            7,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (574)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,979
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,631
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,308
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,308
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Luther Ray WILSON, Jr.

No. 217P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of May 2006 by Defendant for "Petition For All Writ For Appeal To A En-Banc Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of June 2006."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49679-49680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16821]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Reclamation


San Luis Drainage Feature Re-evaluation Draft Environmental 
Impact Statement, Alameda, Contra Costa, Fresno, Kern, Kings, Merced, 
San Joaquin, San Luis Obispo, and Stanislaus Counties, CA

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

ACTION: Extension of public review and comment period for the Draft 
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation is extending the public review and 
comment period for the Draft EIS to Thursday, September 1, 2005. The 
notice of availability of the Draft EIS and notice of public hearings 
was published in the Federal Register on June 2, 2005, (70 FR 32370). 
The public review period was originally scheduled to end on August 1, 
2005.

DATES: Submit comments on the Draft EIS by close of business Thursday, 
September 1, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the Draft EIS to Ms. Claire Jacquemin, 
Bureau of Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, MP-700, Sacramento, CA 95825.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jerry Robbins, Project Manager, at 
916-978-5061, TDD 916-978-5608. The Draft EIS is also available online 
at http://www.usbr.gov/mp/nepa/nepa_projdetails.cfm?Project_ID=61. To 
request a copy of the Draft EIS please contact Ms. Jacquemin at 916-
978-5119.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Our practice is to make comments, including 
names and home addresses of respondents, available for public review. 
Individual respondents may request that we withhold their home address 
from public disclosure, which we will honor to the extent allowable by 
law. There may also be circumstances in which we would withhold a 
respondent's identity from public disclosure, as allowable by law. If 
you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must state this 
prominently at the beginning of your comment. We will make all 
submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals 
identifying themselves

[[Page 49680]]

as representatives or officials of organizations or businesses, 
available for public disclosure in their entirety.

    Dated: July 29, 2005.
Frank Michny,
Regional Environmental Officer, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 05-16821 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P
DAVID K. EVERSON AND PATRICIA M. EVERSON v. THE HONORABLE CATHERINE C. EAGLES, SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE.

No. 265P06

Supreme Court of North Carolina

August 17, 2006

**ORDER**

> "Plainitff-Petitiner's Pro Se Petition for Writ of Mandamus/ and or Declaratory Ruling and Pro Se Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Declaratory Ruling are denied pursuant to Rule 34 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure as a frivolous filing. Plaintiff-Petitioner is no longer allowed to file pro se in this civil matter before the Court. Any future filing in this matter by Plaintiff-Petitioner which is not accompanied by a certification signed by a licensed North Carolina attorney, who is in good standing with the North Carolina State Bar, verifying Plaintiff-Petitioner's claims are of merit and not frivolous, will not be processed.

> Furthermore, pursuant to Rule 34, we remand this matter to Rockingham County for a hearing to determine sanctions, if appropriate. by order of the Court in Conference this the 0th day of *bad date* 0.
STATE v. MANGUM

No. COA06-1292.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from Harnett (05CRS56470, 06CRS3851).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 136 (Monday, July 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15218]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-95263; File No. SR-MRX-2022-04]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq MRX, LLC; Notice of 
Withdrawal of Proposed Rule Change To Amend MRX's Pricing Schedule at 
Options 7 To Assess Membership, Port and Market Data Fees

July 12, 2022.
    On May 2, 2022, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'') filed with the Securities 
and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ and Rule 19b-4 
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to assess membership, port and 
market data fees. The proposed rule change was published for comment in 
the Federal Register on May 18, 2022.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94901 (May 12, 
2022), 87 FR 30305.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On June 29, 2022, MRX withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-MRX-
2022-04).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-15218 Filed 7-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
**Exhibit 32**

 

**Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Thecertification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 26, 2005(the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) orRule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “ExchangeAct”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode.

 

AnthonyJ. Cuti, the Chief Executive Officer and John K. Henry, the Chief FinancialOfficer of Duane Reade Holdings, Inc., each certifies that, to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

1.                                       theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Exchange Act; and

 

2.                                       theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Duane Reade Holdings, Inc.

 

 
|                     | /s/ Anthony J.  Cuti     |   |
|--------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                     | Anthony J. Cuti          |
|                     | Chief Executive  Officer |
|                     |                     |
|                     |                     |
|                     | /s/ John K.  Henry       |   |
|                     | John K. Henry            |
| Date: May 16,  2005 | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Duane ReadeHoldings, Inc. and will be retained by Duane Reade Holdings, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40120 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JAIME CANTU Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-609-1 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney retained to represent Jaime Cantu has moved for leave to withdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with Andersv. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cantu has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 12, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 577

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3903 South Congress Avenue in Austin, 

Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Henry Ybarra III Post Office 

Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 577 EH

1 SECTION 1. SERGEANT HENRY YBARRA III POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 3903 South Congress Avenue in 

5 Austin, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Ser6 geant Henry Ybarra III Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Henry 

11 Ybarra III Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 

2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 577

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostYbarra III Post Office Building’’. nue in Austin, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Henry al Service located at 3903 South Congress Ave-
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing WorldWide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending DECEMBER 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James Marvin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                                   /s/ James Marvin
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   James Marvin
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   Date: February 19, 2008


                                    Page 26
HONACHER v. EVERSON.

No. COA05-719.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed March 7, 2006.

Certification Date March 27, 2006.

Appeal from Rockingham (03CVS1334)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Curtis D. THOMPSON.

No. 43P99-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Curtis D. Thompson, Pro Se.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 14th day of June 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Robeson County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."