alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet of MidAmerican  Energy Company as of March 31, 1997,
and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the three
months  ended March 31,  1997,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
 </LEGEND> 
<CIK>                         0000928576
<NAME>                        MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,612,583
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    94,513
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         282,465
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       380,528
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 190,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,560,415
<COMMON>                                       563,685
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            424,195
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 987,880
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                    31,766
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           982,623
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 40,025
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  125,068
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,243,053
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3,560,415
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      465,881
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           23,504
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     385,970
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     409,474
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        56,407
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             1,318
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 57,725
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       22,501
<NET-INCOME>                                   35,224
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    2,774
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  32,450
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       31,500
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      19,886
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         157,885
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
Lori PEREZ, Employee v. AMERICAN AIRLINES/AMR CORP., Employer Aig Vendor Services, Carrier (Administered by Specialty Risk Services).

No. 661PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

Joy H. Brewer, Cary, for American Airlines, Inc.

John A. Hedrick, Raleigh, for Lori Perez.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of November 2005 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Defendants shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of *187the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
STATE of North Carolina v. Waddy Nathan AGNEW.

No. 388PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Kevin P. Bradley, Durham, for Agnew.

*904Dahr Joseph Tanoury, Assistant Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of July 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
STATE v. WILSON.

No. COA05-1088.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 2, 2006.

Certification Date May 22, 2006.

Appeal from Duplin (03CRS51317).

Case without published opinion. No error.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-10066

Summary Calendar

ROBERT RICH,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

WARDEN R. TAMEZ, FCI Fort Worth,

Respondent -Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:11-CV-206

Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Robert Rich, federal prisoner # 19351-077, appeals the district court’s

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition as an abuse of the writ. Our review is

for an abuse of discretion. See James v. Cain, 56 F.3d 662, 665 (5th Cir. 1995). 

A § 2241 petition is considered to be abusive if it raises “the same legal

issue” addressed and resolved in a prior filing. United States v. Tubwell, 37 F.3d

175, 177-78 (5th Cir. 1994); see also Williams v. Tamez, 466 F. App’x 326, 327

(5th Cir. 2012) (finding that district court did not abuse its discretion in

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 5, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 12-10066 Document: 00512011377 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/05/2012
No. 12-10066

dismissing a § 2241 petition as an abuse of the writ where the petition raised the

same legal issue as a prior petition). Despite Rich’s purported modifications to

his second § 2241 petition which would allow him to bring a Richardson claim

under the savings clause, the legal issue remains the same. Moreover, Rich’s

arguments that his second petition was not successive, that the district court 

should not have dismissed his petition sua sponte, and that the district court’s

sanction warning was unfair, all are without merit. 

The appeal is without arguable merit and therefore frivolous. See Howard

v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). The Government’s motion to

dismiss the appeal as frivolous is GRANTED. The Government’s alternative

motion for summary affirmance or an extension of time to file a brief is

DENIED. Rich is warned that future frivolous filings will result in the

imposition of sanctions, including monetary sanctions and restrictions on his

ability to file pleadings in this court or any court subject to this court’s

jurisdiction. 

2

Case: 12-10066 Document: 00512011377 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/05/2012
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1394/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1394/2013 of 13 December 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in Greenland            waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of V and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Spain         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1394/2013                     

# of 13 December 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in Greenland waters of NAFO 1F and Greenland waters of V and XIV by vessels                        flying the flag of Spain                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1397/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1397/2013 of 17 December 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in EU and Norwegian            waters of IV north of 53° 30′ N by vessels flying the flag of United Kingdom         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1397/2013                     

# of 17 December 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in EU and Norwegian waters of IV north of 53° 30′ N by vessels flying the                        flag of United Kingdom                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1242/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1242/2013 of 25 November 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Cordero Segureño (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1242/2013                     

# of 25 November 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Cordero Segureño                        (PGI)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Cordero Segureño’                              was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Cordero Segureño’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.2.****Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)**U.K.

#### SPAINU.K.

Cordero Segureño (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 180, 26.6.2013, p. 21.
Exhibit 32

Certification

Each of the undersigned officers of Allin Corporation (the Company), certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | the Companys report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|               |  |                         |  | 
|-------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|March 29, 2006 |  | /s/ Richard W. Talarico |  | 
|               |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|               |  |                        
|March 29, 2006 |  | /s/ Dean C. Praskach    |  | 
|               |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. Marcus L. SPENCER.

No. 364P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Chris Z. Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of July 2006 by Defendant for Dismissal:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 25th day of January 2007."
<PAGE>
 

                             CONTROL DEVICES, INC
                       CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE              Exhibit 11
               (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
 
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION>
                                                             
                                                                                     Three Months Ended          Three Months Ended
Primary:                                                                                March 31, 1997              March 31, 1996
                                                                                     __________________          _________________
<S>                                                                                   <C>                           <C> 
Net income applicable to common shareholders                                               $1,536                         $  861
                                                                             
Weighted average number of Common Shares outstanding:                                       4,963                          2,564
Weighted average number of common shares equivalents options                                  114                            -
                                                                                     ------------------          -----------------
Weighted average number of common shares and equivalents options                            5,077                          2,564
                                                                                     ==================          =================
Earnings per share - Primary                                                               $ 0.30                         $ 0.34
                                                                             
                                                                             
Fully diluted:                                                               
                                                                             
Net income applicable to common shareholders                                               $1,536                         $  861
                                                                             
Weighted average number of common shares and equivalents options                            5,077                          2,564
Additonal common shares issuable assuming full dilution                                         5                            -
                                                                                     ------------------          -----------------
Weighted average number of common shares and equivalents options assuming 
 full dilution                                                                              5,082                          2,564 
                                                                                     ==================          =================
Earnings per share - Fully diluted                                                         $ 0.30                         $ 0.34

</TABLE>