alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, John D. Reedy, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s thirdfiscal quarter of 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 4,2004
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3158 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3158

  To extend the authority for the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
                              Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2008

 Mr. Reid (for Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Kerry)) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the authority for the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
                              Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
Commission Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE ADVISORY 
              COMMISSION.

    Section 8(a) of Public Law 87-126 (16 U.S.C. 459b-7(a)) is amended 
in the second sentence by striking ``2008'' and inserting ``2018''.
                                 <all>
```
BLOHM v. CLARK

No. COA06-899

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from Wake (04CVS11828).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kasey Lee NIPPER.

No. 346PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

David Childers, Mount Holly, for Nipper.

*189Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 629 S.E.2d 883.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of July 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
SMITH v. SOUTHLAND PINE NEEDLES.

COA05-1624.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 7, 2006.

Certification Date November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #191193).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1179/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1179/2013 of 20 November 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1179/2013                     

# of 20 November 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,863
<SECURITIES>                                    13,285
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,235
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,770
<INVENTORY>                                     22,398
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,806
<PP&E>                                          43,580
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 248,956
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,435
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           207
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   248,956
<SALES>                                        264,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               264,845
<CGS>                                          173,317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  173,317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                67,113
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,555
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,466
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,089
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,089
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.69
        

</TABLE>
IN RE R.A.H.

No. COA06-183.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Carteret (04J41, 04J42).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated.
STATE of North Carolina v. Derrick Lynn HENDRICKS.

No. 87P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Derrick Lynn Hendricks, Pro Se.

Daniel S. Johnson, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 7th day of February 2007 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of February 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*368"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BOCA RESORTS, INC. FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          55,052
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,491
<PP&E>                                       1,032,497
<DEPRECIATION>                                  47,188
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,284,904
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          116,224
<BONDS>                                        340,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           406
<OTHER-SE>                                     489,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,284,904
<SALES>                                        386,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               392,832
<CGS>                                          194,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               132,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,688
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,688
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (4,287)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,401
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 25, 2004 of Edelbrock Corporation (the Company) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, O.
Victor Edelbrock, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m(a) or § 78o(d));
and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. November 9, 2004
    
    O. VICTOR EDELBROCKO. Victor Edelbrock
Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer
 22
STATE of North Carolina v. Nathaniel Mark UPSHUR.

No. 124P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Paul Pooley, for Nathaniel M. Upshur.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 625 S.E.2d 911.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 28th day of March 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 28th day of March 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
# L_2013206EN.01000601.xml

| 2.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 206/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 206/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 June 2013

appointing a Spanish member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2013/414/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Spanish Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1).

| (2) | A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Alberto NADAL BELDA, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Alberto NADAL BELDA,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Eduardo del PUEYO PÉREZ is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 June 2013.

For the Council

The President

E. GILMORE

---

(1)  
  OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  financial  statements of the Company for the period ended December
31,  1996 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
statements.

</LEGEND>


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         4,191,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  15,731,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   614,000
<INVENTORY>                                    10,749,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               31,403,000
<PP&E>                                         16,070,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 981,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 97,631,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,449,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       150
<OTHER-SE>                                     54,167,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   97,631,000
<SALES>                                        59,938,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               59,938,000
<CGS>                                          26,940,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,545,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,529,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,727,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,256,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (3,527,000)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,783,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.53)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2370

ROBERT E. KELTNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HOLMES R. SHAVER, individually and as President of the Wood County Commission; DAVID A.

COUCH, individually and as member of the Wood

County Commission; ROBERT K. TEBAY, individually and as member of the Wood County

Commission; KEITH LITTON, individually and as

a duly appointed officer of the Wood County

Commission; MICHAEL BALZANO; LOUIS BALZANO,

d/b/a Eddies Auto Parts Company,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virinia, at Parkersburg. Robert C. Chambers,

District Judge. (CA-00-1162-6)

Submitted: February 14, 2002 Decided: February 21, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert E. Keltner, Appellant Pro Se. Mark William Browning,

SHUMAN, MCCLUSKEY & SLICER, P.L.L.C., Charleston, West Virginia;

David Edward Schumacher, SCHUMACHER, FRANCIS & NELSON, Charleston,

West Virginia, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Robert E. Keltner appeals two separate district court orders

granting the Appellees’ motions for summary judgment on his civil

action alleging that various vehicles were improperly removed from

his property. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Keltner v. Shaver, No.

CA-00-1162-6 (S.D.W. Va. filed Oct. 12, 2001; entered Oct. 15,

2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
STATE v. COLCLOUGH.

No. COA06-369.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (03CRS54184, 03CRS54186, 03CRS54190, 03CRS54193, 03CRS54197, 03CRS54199, 03CRS54202, 03CRS54204, 03CRS54667)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.