alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5796 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5796

 To provide funding for the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation for 
              mortgage foreclosure mitigation activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 15, 2008

  Ms. Clarke introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide funding for the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation for 
              mortgage foreclosure mitigation activities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foreclosure Prevention Act of 
2008''.

SEC. 2. HOUSING COUNSELING RESOURCES.

    There are appropriated out of any money in the Treasury not 
otherwise appropriated for the fiscal year 2008, for an additional 
amount for the ``Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation--Payment to the 
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation'' $100,000,000, to remain 
available until September 30, 2008, for foreclosure mitigation 
activities under the terms and conditions contained in the second 
undesignated paragraph (beginning with the phrase ``For an additional 
amount'') under the heading ``Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation--
Payment to the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation'' of Public Law 
110-161.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0680 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. REX WILLIAM ALLEN,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**O RDER**  Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 26 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 20 2023

06/20/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0680
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3099 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3099

     To prohibit the use of funds by the Department of Defense for 
propaganda purposes within the United States not otherwise specifically 
                           authorized by law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2008

 Mr. Kerry (for himself, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Dorgan, and Mr. Lautenberg) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To prohibit the use of funds by the Department of Defense for 
propaganda purposes within the United States not otherwise specifically 
                           authorized by law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITIONS RELATING TO PROPAGANDA.

    (a) Prohibition.--No funds appropriated or otherwise made available 
by any Act may be used by the Department of Defense for propaganda 
purposes within the United States not otherwise specifically authorized 
by law.
    (b) Reports.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the Department of 
Defense and the Comptroller General of the United States shall each 
conduct a study of, and submit to Congress a report on, the extent to 
which the Department of Defense has violated the prohibition on 
propaganda established in section 8001 of Public Laws 107-117, 107-248, 
108-87, 108-287, 109-148, 109-289, and 110-116, the Department of 
Defense Appropriations Acts for fiscal years 2002 through 2008.
    (c) Definition.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``propaganda'' means any form of communication in support of national 
objectives designed to influence the opinions, emotions, attitudes, or 
behavior of the people of the United States in order to benefit the 
sponsor, either directly or indirectly.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. BLACK

No. COA06-620.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from Hoke (04CRS50772, 04CRS50773).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4656073
<SECURITIES>                                      438341
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1322300
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6416714
<PP&E>                                           7639293
<DEPRECIATION>                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14056007
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2234206
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                      1969206
<COMMON>                                           43682
<OTHER-SE>                                       9808913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14056007
<SALES>                                           395634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  395634
<CGS>                                             171422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     171422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1115242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (891030)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                        (271916)
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1162946)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0



</TABLE>
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 783/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 783/2013 of 14 August 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 783/2013                     

# of 14 August 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 August 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
EXHIBIT 24.1


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

 KNOW  ALL  MEN  BY THESE PRESENTS, that each individual whose signature appears
below   constitutes   and  appoints  Jeffrey  P.  Mayer,  his  true  and  lawful
attorney-in-fact  and  agent with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the
Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-Q of ClubCorp, Inc. for the period ended June 13,
2000,  together  with  any  amendments  thereto,  and  to file the same with all
exhibits thereto, and all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission,  granting  unto  said attorney-in-fact and agent full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary  to  be  done  in  and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes  as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that  said  attorney-in-fact  and  agent  or  his substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully  do  or cause to be done by virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements
of  the  Securities  Act  of  1934,  as amended, this Power of Attorney has been
signed  by  the  following  person  in  the  capacity and on the date indicated:




 Signature:  /s/James M. Hinckley
             ------------------
             James M. Hinckley
Title:       Chief Operating Officer
             and Director
Date:        July 21, 2000
# L_2014349DE.01006701.xml

| 5.12.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 349/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 349/67

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 609/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 12. Juni 2013 über Lebensmittel für Säuglinge und Kleinkinder, Lebensmittel für besondere medizinische Zwecke und Tagesrationen für gewichtskontrollierende Ernährung und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 92/52/EWG des Rates, der Richtlinien 96/8/EG, 1999/21/EG, 2006/125/EG und 2006/141/EG der Kommission, der Richtlinie 2009/39/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates sowie der Verordnungen (EG) Nr. 41/2009 und (EG) Nr. 953/2009 des Rates und der Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 181 vom 29. Juni 2013
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 181 vom 29. Juni 2013

Auf Seite 44, Kapitel II Abschnitt 1 Artikel 9 Absatz 5:

anstatt:

„(5)   Kennzeichnung und Aufmachung der in Artikel 1 Absatz 1 genannten Lebensmittel sowie die Werbung dafür müssen Informationen über die angemessene Verwendung dieser Lebensmittels bieten ...“

muss es heißen:

„(5)   Kennzeichnung und Aufmachung der in Artikel 1 Absatz 1 genannten Lebensmittel sowie die Werbung dafür müssen Informationen über die angemessene Verwendung dieser Lebensmittel bieten ...“

;

auf Seite 44, Kapitel II Abschnitt 1 Artikel 10 Absatz 2:

anstatt:

„(2)   Die Kennzeichnung und Aufmachung von Säuglingsanfangsnahrung und die Werbung dafür sowie die Kennzeichnung von Folgenahrung darf weder Kinderbilder noch andere Bilder ...“

muss es heißen:

„(2)   Die Kennzeichnung und Aufmachung von Säuglingsanfangsnahrung und die Werbung dafür sowie die Kennzeichnung von Folgenahrung darf weder Bilder von Säuglingen noch andere Bilder ...“

.

---
**Exhibit 10.32**

**SECOND AMENDMENT**

**TO THE**

**CLUBCORP, INC. OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN**

**WHEREAS**, ClubCorp, Inc. (the“Company”) adopted and established the ClubCorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan (“Original Plan”) effective February 10, 1998 ; 

**WHEREAS**, the Company restated the Original Plan effective January 1, 2001 (“Prior Plan”); 

**WHEREAS**,the Company amended and restated the Prior Plan, effective January 1, 2005 (“Plan”); 

**WHEREAS**, an offering process iscurrently underway whereby Goldman Sachs has been engaged to find potential buyers of the Company (“Transaction”); 

**WHEREAS**, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to provide that (i) outstanding options will become one hundred percent (100%) vested upon the closing of the Transaction (“Closing”), and (ii) cash will bepaid for such options immediately; and 

**WHEREAS**, pursuant to Section 7.2 of the Plan, the Committee may amend the Plan withrespect to any shares which, at the time, are not subject to Awards. 

**NOW THEREFORE**, the Plan is hereby amended, effective uponexecution of this Amendment, as follows: 

1. Section 6 of the Plan is amended by adding the following new Section 6.16 immediatelyfollowing existing Section 6.15 and immediately preceding Section 7: 

**“6.16 G-S Change of Control**.Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, all unexercised and unexpired Options held by a Holder immediately prior to the closing of a G-S Change in Control (as defined herein) will become fully vested the day of the closing of a G-SChange in Control and will be deemed to be exercised on such date, provided Holder is an employee of the Corporation on such date. Upon such deemed exercise and in full satisfaction of the Holder’s rights in connection with such Options, theCorporation will immediately pay the Holder a cash amount that is equal to the difference between the Option’s Exercise Price and the gross price received for the Stock as a result of the G-S Change of Control times the number of shares coveredby the unexercised and unexpired vested portion of such Holder’s Option, subject to the limitations imposed by Code Section 162(m) and Section 5.3 of the Plan.” 

2. Section 1 of the Plan is amended by adding the following new Section 1.35: 

“**1.35 “G-S Change of Control”** means a Change in Control resulting from the offering process underway as of June 2006whereby Goldman Sachs was engaged to find potential buyers of the Company and pursuant to which Goldman Sachs becomes entitled to receive its negotiated fee for locating the ultimate successful buyer of the Company.” 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, this Amendment to the Plan has been executed this 26th day of June, 2006. 

 
CLUBCORP, INC.By: 
/s/ Tom Henslee
Its: EVP, Secretary and General Counsel
 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
CHASE INDUSTRIES INC. QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE PERIOD
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,339
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,862
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,267
<INVENTORY>                                     49,233
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,257
<PP&E>                                         182,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,097
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,481
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           153
<OTHER-SE>                                     148,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,097
<SALES>                                        312,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               312,578
<CGS>                                          267,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  267,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,342
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,161
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,821
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,052
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,769
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,769
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.96


</TABLE>
D.A.N. JOINT VENTURE, III, L.P. v. FENNER.

No. COA06-628.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 20, 2007.

Certification Date March 12, 2007.

Appeal from Dare (02CVS187).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Optics  Electronics,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, John
Cousins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     3.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

     4.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                            /S/ JOHN COUSINS
                                            -----------------------
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                            March 30, 2004

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                                                              28
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140579 & (54) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140579 

 COA: 281972 

Wayne CC: 07-003296-FC 

HOUSAM J. BAYDOUN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is GRANTED. The 

application for leave to appeal the January 12, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented 

should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 4.5.1

                   SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE MOVIE GALLERY, INC.
                                 2003 STOCK PLAN

         This Second Amendment to the Movie Gallery, Inc. 2003 Stock Plan is
effective as of this 10th day of June, 2005, with reference to the following
facts:

         A. The Board of Directors of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the "Company") voted
to amend the Company's 2003 Stock Plan (the "2003 Plan") to reserve an
additional 3,500,000 shares of Company's common stock for future grants of
awards under the 2003 Plan at a duly noticed meeting of the Board of Directors
held on March 17, 2005.

         B. The stockholders of the Company duly and validly approved the
amendment to the 2003 Plan to reserve an additional 3,500,000 shares of
Company's common stock for future grants of awards under the 2003 Plan at the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company held on June 9, 2005 in Atlanta,
Georgia.

         Effective as of the date hereof, the 2003 Plan is hereby amended as
follows:

         1. Section 6 of the Company's 2003 Plan, as amended to date, is hereby
further amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

         "6. STOCK

                     The stock issued to Purchasers or subject to Options
           granted under the Plan shall be shares of the Corporation's
           authorized but unissued or reacquired Common Stock. The aggregate
           number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan shall not exceed
           the sum of (i) 4,837,525 Shares plus (ii) up to 2,830,224 additional
           Shares representing the number of shares reserved for issuance under
           the Predecessor Plan pursuant to "Options" (as defined therein)
           outstanding under the Predecessor Plan as of the effective date
           referred to in Section 3 to the extent that such "Options" expire or
           are terminated, in whole or in part, without being exercised. The
           number of Shares subject to Options or other rights outstanding at
           any time shall not exceed the number of Shares remaining available
           for issuance under the Plan. In the event that any outstanding Option
           or other right for any reason expires or is terminated, the Shares
           allocable to the unexercised portion of such Option or other right
           may again be made subject to an Option or other right. No eligible
           person shall be granted Options or other rights during any 12-month
           period covering more than 250,000 Shares. The limitations established
           by this Section 6 shall be subject to adjustment in the manner
           provided in Section 14 hereof upon the occurrence of an event
           specified in that Section."

                                        MOVIE GALLERY, INC.


                                        By: /s/ S. Page Todd
                                           ------------------------------------
                                             Name:  S. Page Todd
                                             Title:  Executive Vice President