alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         35,366
<SECURITIES>                                   1,876,030
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,094,426
<ALLOWANCES>                                   175,791
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,103,713
<PP&E>                                         440,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                 197,593
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,538,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,844,748
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       23,944
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,538,656
<SALES>                                        3,683,463
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,792,831
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,452,780
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               161,558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             48,761
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,708,710)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                112,797
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,821,507)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (1.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ES-960-1910-BJ, ES-053598, Group 22, Maine] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, DOI. 

# ACTION:

Notice of filing of plat of survey; Maine. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. 

The lands we surveyed are: 

*Township 1, Range 6, East of the West Line of the State.*

The plat of the dependent resurvey and survey of the boundaries of the land held in trust by the United States, for the Penobscot Indian Nation, in Township 1, Range 6, West of the East Line of the State, (T. 1, R. 6, W.E.L.S.), Penobscot County, Maine, was accepted August 18, 2005. We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information. 

If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, prior to the date of official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest. 

We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals. 

Dated: August 18, 2005. 

Stephen D. Douglas, 

Chief Cadastral Surveyor. 

[FR Doc. 05-16815 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           13391
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1772
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      42009
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            2862
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              2834
<LOANS>                                         417887
<ALLOWANCE>                                       4189
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  489807
<DEPOSITS>                                      335529
<SHORT-TERM>                                     67644
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              12106
<LONG-TERM>                                      40916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                       33569
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  489807
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  17012
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1193
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   128
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 18333
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                8057
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10639
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             7694
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  17
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   5594
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2943
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2943
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1943
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   8.234
<LOANS-NON>                                        992
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   2904
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  4293
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 4189
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              4189
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           3969
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
23.1




Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm










To the
Board of Directors


ERF
Wireless, Inc.


League
City, Texas




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in ERF Wireless, Inc.’s (the
“Company”) Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-143328 and No. 1443326)
of our report dated March 25, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial
statements which appear in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006.







/s/ LBB & Associates,
Ltd., LLP


LBB
& ASSOCIATES LTD., LLP


Houston,
Texas


April 1,
2008
<PAGE>

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-44614 and 333-44616 of Return Assured Incorporated, formerly known as Hertz
Technology Group, Inc., all on Form S-3 of our report dated September 27, 2000
and October 17, 2000 relating to the audited financial statements for the period
ending August 31, 2000 of Return Assured Incorporated (formerly A Sure
eCommerce, Inc.), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Return
Assured Incorporated, formerly known as Hertz Technology Group, Inc., to be
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

/s/ Pannell Kerr Forster
Vancouver, Canada
December 12, 2000
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of a REIT, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
    September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                          



| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ ANTHONY W. THOMPSON                  
| |                                          
| | Anthony W. Thompson                      
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer

Date: November 15, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document. The signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to A REIT, Inc. and will
be retained by A REIT, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 11

YOUNG BROADCASTING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES        RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

THREE MONTHS ENDED

NINE MONTHS ENDEDSeptember 30,
2007

September 30,
2008

September 30,
2007

September 30,
2008Shares of common stock outstanding for the entire period


22,581,720


23,778,645


21,966,886


22,872,482Issuance of 453,613 and 1,085,638 shares of common stock to the Company's defined contribution plan in 2007 and 2008


116,551





251,302


697,935Issuance of 495,500 and 0 shares of common stock under the 2004 equity incentive plan in 2007 and 2008








212,357


Cancellation of 213,198 and 190,090 shares of common stock to the employee stock purchase plan in 2007 and 2008


(40,343
)

(6,514
)

(96,205
)

(92,050
)Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding


22,657,928


23,772,131


22,334,340


23,478,367Loss from continuing operations

$
(15,946,840
)
$
(12,623,484
)
$
(45,300,311
)
$
(39,437,525
)Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes


(8,870,835
)

(9,601,153
)

(23,073,958
)

(150,755,245
)Net loss

$
(24,817,675
)
$
(22,224,437
)
$
(68,374,269
)
$
(190,192,770
)Basic and diluted loss per common shares:Loss from continuing operations

$
(0.70
)
$
(0.53
)
$
(2.03
)
$
(1.68
)Loss from discontinued operations

$
(0.40
)
$
(0.40
)
$
(1.03
)
$
(6.42
)Net loss per common share basic and diluted

$
(1.10
)
$
(0.93
)
$
(3.06
)
$
(8.10
)


---



QuickLinks
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1219/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1219/2013 of 27 November 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in EU and Norwegian            waters of IV north of 53° 30′ N by vessels flying the flag of France         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1219/2013                     

# of 27 November 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in EU and Norwegian waters of IV north of 53° 30′ N by vessels flying the                        flag of France                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6869

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID ZIMMERMAN HESS, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CR-92-15, CA-97-968-18-2) Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 20, 1998 Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.David Zimmerman Hess, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David Zimmerman Hess, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hess , Nos. CR-92-15; CA-97-968-18-2 (D.S.C. Jan. 27, 1998; May 27, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

The
following certification will not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor
will the certification be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the registrant
specifically incorporates it by reference.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Robert E. Wheaton, President and Chief Executive Officer of Star Buffet, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

|April 29, 2005 |  | /s/ROBERT E. WHEATONRobert E. Wheaton
President and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of the above certification has been provided to Star Buffet, Inc. and will be retained by Star Buffet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
STATE v. RAMIREZ-MARCIANO.

No. COA05-1649.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (03CRS24454, 03CRS24455, 03CRS24456, 03CRS24457)

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


July 12, 2016


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 252


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on July 11, 2016, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms and
Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the
evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-211083) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
In re: Foreclosure of Hunt.

No. 173P06

Supreme Court of North Carolina

August 17, 2006

The following order has been entered on the alternative motion filed on the 24th day of May 2006 by Defendant to modify order:

> Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of August 2006.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hiram A. Gross, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 430]

Rose, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered July 23, 2004, upon a verdict convicting defendant of two counts of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

Defendant was charged with two felony counts of driving while intoxicated after police officers observed him driving erratically and a subsequent breathalyzer test revealed a blood alcohol content of 0.18% *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 [2], [3]; § 1193 [1] [c] [i]). Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of both counts and sentenced to concurrent terms of 1 *1225to 3 years in prison. He now appeals, asserting ineffective assistance of counsel.

We affirm. Defendant’s contention that his counsel was ineffective by failing to challenge the admissibility of his statements based upon the inadequacy of the People’s CPL 710.30 notice is unavailing. To the extent that this issue concerns matters outside of the present record, it is more properly the subject of a CPL article 440 motion in which additional facts, including the sum and substance of defendant’s statements as reflected in the CPL 710.30 notice, may be developed *(see People v Green,*9 AD3d 687, 688 [2004]; *People v Donaldson,*1 AD3d 800, 801 [2003], *lv denied*2 NY3d 739 [2004]). Although defendant has not included the CPL 710.30 notice in this record, his counsel clearly acknowledged its receipt at arraignment and moved to suppress the statements on voluntariness grounds. Defendant later consented to their admissibility and waived his right to a *Huntley*hearing.

Next, we discern no error in counsel’s stipulation to the admissibility of the breathalyzer results during trial. Although this stipulation foreclosed a question of fact regarding the reliability of the breathalyzer device, it occurred only after counsel had reviewed the evidence indicating that the device was used properly and had discussed the issue with defendant. Moreover, the record reveals that the stipulation enabled counsel to focus upon the defense of justification as the primary theory of the case. Inasmuch as defendant’s hindsight disagreement with counsel’s trial strategy or losing tactics will not render assistance ineffective *(see People v Demetsenare,*14 AD3d 792, 793 [2005]; *People v Murray,*7 AD3d 828, 831 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 679 [2004]; *People v Sowizdral,*275 AD2d 473, 476 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 969 [2000]), we find that defendant’s representation, viewed in its totality, was meaningful.

Crew III, J.P., Peters, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.