alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6289

ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; BRUCE C. MORRIS;

SANDRA L. COMBS; WINNIE R. DIXON; JOSEPH F.

LEWIS; LINDA R. PITMAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-96-162-R)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Ray Thompson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)

(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. Virginia, No. CA-96-

162-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5564 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exclude an individual who has 

been convicted of committing certain sex offenses from receiving certain 

burial-related benefits and funeral honors which are otherwise available 

to certain veterans, members of the Armed Forces, and related individuals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2008 

Mr. SHADEGG (for himself, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, Mr. POE, Mr. BACHUS, 

and Mr. FOSSELLA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exclude an individual who has been convicted of committing certain 

sex offenses from receiving certain burial-related benefits 

and funeral honors which are otherwise available to certain veterans, members of the Armed Forces, and related 

individuals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as ‘‘Jenny’s Law’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5564 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF PERSONS CONVICTED OF COMMIT2 TING CERTAIN SEX OFFENSES FROM RECEIV3 ING CERTAIN BURIAL-RELATED BENEFITS 

4 AND FUNERAL HONORS. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION AGAINST INTERMENT OR MEMORI6 ALIZATION IN NATIONAL CEMETARY ADMINISTRATION, 

7 ARLINGTON NATIONAL CEMETARY, AND CERTAIN STATE

8 VETERANS’ CEMETARIES, AND TERMINATION OF PROVI9 SION OF PRESIDENTIAL MEMORIAL CERTIFICATE, FLAG, 

10 AND HEADSTONE OR MARKER.—Section 2411(b) of title 

11 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end 

12 the following new paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(4) A person who is classified as a tier III sex 

14 offender under the Sex Offender Registration and 

15 Notification Act.’’. 

16 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

17 shall be construed to terminate any benefit available to 

18 any person except those benefits specifically terminated by 

19 the amendment made by subsection (a). 

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to interments and 

22 memorializations that occur on or after the date of the 

23 enactment of this Act. 

24 SEC. 3. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY. 

25 The constitutional authority on which this Act rests 

26 is the power of Congress to make rules for the government 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5564 IH

1 and regulation of the land and naval forces, as enumerated 

2 in article I, section 8, clause 14 of the United States Con3 stitution. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### National Park Service

Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) that the Boston Harbor Islands Advisory Council will meet on Wednesday, September 7, 2005. The meeting will convene at 6 p.m. at the New England Aquarium Conference Center, Central Wharf, Boston, MA.

The Advisory Council was appointed by the Director of National Park Service pursuant to Public Law 104-333. The 28 members represent business, educational/cultural, community and environmental entities; municipalities surrounding Boston Harbor; Boston Harbor advocates; and Native American interests. The purpose of the Council is to advise and make recommendations to the Boston Harbor Islands Partnership with respect to the development and implementation of a management plan and the operations of the Boston Harbor Islands national park area. 

The Agenda for this meeting is as follows: 

1. Call to Order, Introductions of Advisory Council members present 

2. Review and approval of minutes of the June meeting

3. Youth Program Report

4. Peddocks Island-Fort Andrews Preservation and Adaptive Reuse Project

5. Review of Summer Season

6. Report from the NPS

7. Public Comment

8. Next Meetings

9. Adjourn 

The meeting is open to the public. Further information concerning Council meetings may be obtained from the Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands. Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the Council or file written statements. Such requests should be made at least seven days prior to the meeting to: Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA, 408 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA 02110, telephone (617) 223-8667.

Dated: July 19, 2005.

Bruce Jacobson,

Superintendent, Boston Harbor Islands NRA.

[FR Doc. 05-16877 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4312-52-M
HOWARD v. UNC-CHAPEL HILL

No. COA06-487

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #149985).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
#### Abram Lieberman, Appellant, v Lisa Lieberman, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 382]

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated April 29, 2003, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marks, J.H.O.), dated December 17, 2003, which, after a hearing, inter alia, (1) denied that branch of his motion which was to modify the judgment of divorce to eliminate or reduce his obligation to pay maintenance, (2) granted *1005that branch of his motion which was for an award of child support only to the extent of directing the defendant to pay child support in the sum of $216 per month effective January 2, 2004, and (3) granted that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which was for maintenance arrears in the sum of $5,250.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of his motion which was to eliminate or reduce his obligation to pay his former wife maintenance. Although the plaintiff claimed that his income had substantially decreased due to a work-related injury, the court did not credit his assertion that this alleged decrease was involuntary. Since the court had the opportunity to view the demeanor of the witnesses at the hearing, it was in the best position to gauge their credibility, and its resolution of credibility issues is entitled to great deference on appeal *(see Matter of Sosa v Sosa,*13 AD3d 638 [2004]; *Koeth v Koeth,*309 AD2d 786 [2003]; *Carniol v Carniol,*306 AD2d 366 [2003]; *Blankenship v Kerr,*225 AD2d 645 [1996]). Upon our review of the record, we perceive no reason to disturb the court’s findings that the decrease in the plaintiff’s income was voluntary and that he remained capable of earning $100,000 per year *(see Chi-Yuan Hwang v Hwang,*308 AD2d 560 [2003]; *Costello v Costello,*304 AD2d 517 [2003]). We also note that the parties’ judgment awarded the defendant, who was not employed at the time of the divorce, maintenance for a period of only three years, and the fact that she was still unemployed less than one year after the divorce did not provide a basis for elimination or reduction of the plaintiffs maintenance obligation.

Furthermore, the amount of child support which the court awarded to the plaintiff was not an improvident exercise of discretion under the circumstances of this case *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b] [a], [f]; *Blankenship v Kerr, supra).*

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Adams, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Traci M. TREAT as Guardian ad Litem for Nadie Ait M'Barek, a minor v. Karen ROANE, Veda L. Watson, and Wake Medical Center a/k/a Wakemed.

No. 511P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Charles M. Putterman, Raleigh, for Traci Treat.

*62Christopher G. Smith, Samuel G. Thompson, Raleigh, for Karen Roane.

Dan J. McLamb, Raleigh, T. Carlton Younger, III, for Watson & Wake Medical Center.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 2nd day of October 2006 by Defendant (Karen Roane) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
STATE v. WRIGHT

No. COA06-776

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Onslow (05CRS51062, 05CRS51079).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 133/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 133/2013 of 15 February 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 133/2013                     

# of 15 February 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 February 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# L_2013320EN.01004301.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 320/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 320/43

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 25 November 2013

appointing a Latvian member and two Latvian alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/699/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Latvian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Guntars KRIEVIŅŠ. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Guntars KRIEVIŅŠ.

| (3) | An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Viktors GLUHOVS. An alternate member’s seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Jānis VĪTOLIŅŠ as member of the Committee of the Regions, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Viktors GLUHOVS. An alternate member’s seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Jānis VĪTOLIŅŠ as member of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Mr Jānis VĪTOLIŅŠ, First Deputy Chairman of Ventspils City Council |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Mr Jānis VĪTOLIŅŠ, First Deputy Chairman of Ventspils City Council

and

| (b) | as alternate members:






  — | Mr Gunārs ANSIŅŠ, Deputy Chairman of Liepāja City Council |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate members:

—

Mr Gunārs ANSIŅŠ, Deputy Chairman of Liepāja City Council

| — | Ms Olga VEIDIŅA, Chairman of the Social Issues Committee of Rīga City Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Olga VEIDIŅA, Chairman of the Social Issues Committee of Rīga City Council.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2013.

For the Council

The President

D. PAVALKIS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (1)

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  the  following  certification  is  being  made to
accompany the Registrant's  Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
March 31, 2004:

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Catskill  Litigation  Trust (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Joseph
E. Bernstein,  Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
          as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                           /s/ Joseph E. Bernstein
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:   Joseph E. Bernstein
                                           Title: Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                            Date: May 17, 2004

     (1)  A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906
          has been provided to Catskill Litigation Trust and will be retained by
          Catskill Litigation Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
          Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
```
IN RE S.E.F.

No. COA06-611.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 6, 2007.

Certification March 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Harnett (04J156).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Order filed February 4, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00985-CV

____________

ELIGWE, LLC, ET AL, Appellant

V.

LARRY PAUL MANLEY JUNIOR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-53467

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed December 11, 2018. To date, the 

filing fee of $205.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by 

statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 5. Therefore, the court issues the following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $205.00 to the 

clerk of this court on or before February 14, 2020. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If 
appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal 

will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1241/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1241/2013 of 25 November 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Aceite Sierra del Moncayo (PDO)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1241/2013                     

# of 25 November 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Aceite Sierra                        del Moncayo (PDO)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Aceite Sierra del                              Moncayo’ was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Aceite Sierra del Moncayo’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.5.****Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oils, etc.)**U.K.

#### SPAINU.K.

Aceite Sierra del Moncayo (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 187, 29.6.2013, p. 19.
STATE of North Carolina v. Randall Gray STONEMAN, Jr.

No. 59P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Randall Gray Stoneman, Jr.

Tracy Curtner, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st day of February 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."