alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification 
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Dan R. Lee, Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Microtek Medical Holdings, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Form
10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|August 9, 2005 | /s/ Dan R. Lee                                            
|-------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|               | Dan R. Lee
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.4


EXECUTION COPY


Christopher McGurk

c/o Cinedigm Corp

9100 Wilshire Boulevard

400W

Beverly Hills, CA  90212






July 14, 2016


Cinedigm Corp.

902 Broadway, 9th Floor

 New York, NY 10010


Attention: Jeffrey Edell, Chief Financial Officer






Dear Mr. Edell,


This letter sets forth our agreement that I will make a $500,000.00 loan to Cinedigm Corp., a Delaware corporation ("Cinedigm") as a Lender under that certain Second Lien Loan Agreement, dated as of July 14, 2016 among Cinedigm, as the Borrower, Cortland Capital Market Services LLC, as Agent and the Lenders party thereto (the "Second Lien Loan Agreement"), in return for which you will issue to me a Loan (as defined therein) in such amount and the contemporaneous issuance of 49,000 shares of the Company's Class A Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, which shall be valued for all purposes at the closing bid price thereof as reported by NASDAQ immediately preceding the execution and delivery of this letter agreement (the "Closing Price"). This commitment letter supersedes a similar letter executed earlier today.   Capitalized terms used without definition are used as defined in the Second Lien Loan Agreement.


The closing of the transactions contemplated hereby shall occur at a Subsequent Closing that will occur no later than 60 days after the date of this letter agreement. During that period of time, I will in my capacity as CEO and Chairman of the Company cause the Company to honor its commitment to use Best Efforts to place no less than $2,000,000 in additional Second Lien Loans and close the funding of such loans prior to such date.


It is understood and agreed that my commitment pursuant to the terms and conditions of this letter agreement, is a material inducement to the investments and investment commitments that Mr. Ronald L. Chez, and/or entities that he may own or control, is making contemporaneously in the Company, and that he shall be deemed a third party beneficiary of this letter agreement, which shall not be amended, modified, terminated or waived without his prior, written consent.






	 	
Very truly yours,


	 	 
	 	 /s/ Christopher McGurk
	 	
Christopher McGurk







































Accepted and Agreed:







CINEDIGM CORP.







By: /s/ Jeffrey Edell         

 Jeffrey Edell

 Chief Financial Officer
In the Matter of Z.P.S. & A.M.S., Minor Children. appealed by Mother.

No. 32P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Winifred H. Dillon, Raleigh, for Mother.

Stephen M. Schoeberle, for Burke County DSS.

Mary McKay, Attorney-Advocate, Morganton, for Guardian ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of January 2007 by Respondent (Mother) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 6, 2007By:
    
    /s/ John J. DeeJohn J. DeeChief Financial Officer andSenior Vice President(Principal Financial Officer)
STATE v. McLEAN

No. COA06-1055

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Wake (05CRS120264).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# L_2013280EN.01002501.xml

| 22.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 280/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 280/25

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2013/515/CFSP

of 21 October 2013

amending Decision 2010/638/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 25 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 25 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/638/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/638/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be extended until 27 October 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review of Decision 2010/638/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be extended until 27 October 2014.

| (3) | Decision 2010/638/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2010/638/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 8 of Decision 2010/638/CFSP, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

‘2.   This Decision shall apply until 27 October 2014. It shall be kept under constant review. It may be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 21 October 2013.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  Council Decision 2010/638/CFSP of 25 October 2010 concerning restrictive measures against the Republic of Guinea (OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 10).

1

---
CATER, et al. v. BARKER.

No. 546A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Ronald Stephen Patterson, Hayesville, for Cater and O'Connor.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of November 2005 by Defendant to Deem Brief Timely Filed:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of December 2005."
ARMSTRONG v. UC LENDING CORP.

No. 499P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Patricia Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, for UC Lending Corp.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of February 2007 by Plaintiff for "Petition for Rehearing":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of May 2007."
Exhibit 99.1(a)
                                                                 
ADVANTA                            Advanta Mortgage
                                   Suite 400
                                   Fort Washington, PA 19034
                                   215-283-4200




   Report of Management on Compliance with Minimum Servicing Standards
                                

As of and for the year ended December 31, 1995, Advanta Mortgage
Corp. USA has complied in all material respects with the minimum
servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association
of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers. As of and for the same period, Advanta Mortgage Corp.
USA had in effect fidelity bond coverage in the amount of $10
million and mortgage contingent liability protection coverage in
the amount of $2 million.


\s\ William P. Garland         \s\ James L. Shreero
William P. Garland             James L. Shreero
Senior Vice President          Vice President
Loan Servicing                 Finance and Accounting
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elrico Randle, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[801 NYS2d 189]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Frank P Geraci, Jr., J.), rendered November 22, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of robbery in the first degree (three counts), sodomy in the first degree and rape in the first degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed *(see*CPL 450.30 [3]; *People v Gannon,*2 AD3d 1214 [2003]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Gorski, Martoche, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
ROBERTS v. ROBERTS.

No. COA06-361.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 6, 2007.

Certification March 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Guilford (02CVS10553).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Certification of CEO



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of KH Funding Company (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Harris, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated May 20, 2005 |  | /s/ Robert L. Harris                 
|                   |  | Robert L. Harris                     
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such
Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



22
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3050 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3050

To reduce temporarily the duty on certain isotopic separation machinery 
  and apparatus, and parts thereof, for use in the construction of an 
          isotopic separation facility in southern New Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2008

 Mr. Bingaman (for himself and Mr. Domenici) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reduce temporarily the duty on certain isotopic separation machinery 
  and apparatus, and parts thereof, for use in the construction of an 
          isotopic separation facility in southern New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN ISOTOPIC MACHINERY AND APPARATUS, AND PARTS THEREOF, 
              FOR USE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN ISOTROPIC SEPARATION 
              FACILITY IN SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``     9902.84.05      Isotopic            2.2%              No change         No change        On or before  ''
                        separation                                                               12/31/2011    .
                        machinery and
                        apparatus, and
                        parts thereof,
                        for use in the
                        construction of
                        an isotopic
                        separation
                        facility located
                        in southern New
                        Mexico known as
                        the `National
                        Enrichment
                        Facility'
                        (provided for in
                        subheading
                        8401.20.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
HOSPICE AT GREENSBORO, INC. D/B/A Hospice and Palliative Care of Greensboro and Hospice of the Piedmont, Inc., Petitioner v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Division of Facility Services, Licensure and Certification Section and North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Facility Services, Certificate of Need Section, Respondents and Liberty Home Care, LLC, Respondent-Intervenor.

No. 522P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Maureen D. Murray, Susan M. Fradenburg, Allyson Jones Labban, Greensboro, for Hospice, et al.

June S. Ferrell, Assistant Attorney General, for NCDHHS.

Lee M. Whitman, K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, Sarah M. Johnson, Winston-Salem, for Liberty Home Care.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner and Respondents on the 29th day of September 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
STATE v. HODGES.

No. COA06-30.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Caldwell (02CRS7842).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Paul Anthony BROWN.

No. 145A02-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Kenneth J. Rose, Elizbeth Hambourger, Durham, for Paul Brown.

Barry McNeill, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th day of November 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wayne County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."
STATE v. Timothy BLACKWELL.

No. 490PA04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2006.

Patricia A. Duffy, Robert C. Montgomery, Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney Generals, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Marilyn G. Ozer, Chapel Hill, for Blackwell.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th day of October 2006 by Defendant for the Third Motion for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of December 2006."
THREE RIVERS VALLE, LLC v. GROVE PARK INN RESORT, INC.

No. COA05-1427

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Buncombe (04CVS54265).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
CARILLON v. NCDHHS, et al.

No. 54A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2006.

Melissa L. Trippe, Mark A. Davis, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, Thomas M. Woodward, Susan K. Hackney, Assistant Attorney Generals, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Solicitor-General, for NCDHHS, et al.

Forrest W. Campbell, Jr., Greensboro, Charles F. Marshall, III, Raleigh, for Carillon Assistant Living.

Susan M. Fradenburg, Allyson Jones Labban, Greensboro, for Ridge Care, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st day of October *5472006 by Petitioner for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Petitioner (Carillon Assisted Living) shall have up to and including the 20th day of November 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of November 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Donald John SCANLON.

No. 195P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Janet Moore, for Donald John Scanlon.

Barry McNeill, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 11th day of April 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of April 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*53"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
STATE v. CLEVELAND

No. COA06-1026.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Rowan (03CRS53656).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5528 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5528

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 120 Commercial Street in Brockton, Massachusetts, as the ``Rocky 
                    Marciano Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 4, 2008

  Mr. Lynch (for himself, Mr. Markey, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
   Neal of Massachusetts, Mr. Olver, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. McGovern, Mr. 
 Tierney, Mr. Capuano, and Ms. Tsongas) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 120 Commercial Street in Brockton, Massachusetts, as the ``Rocky 
                    Marciano Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROCKY MARCIANO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 120 Commercial Street in Brockton, Massachusetts, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Rocky Marciano Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Rocky 
Marciano Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Robert S. MINOWICZ, Jr., Thomas D. Minowicz, and Steven J. Minowicz v. Donna P. STEPHENS.

No. 616P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Todd R. Cerwin, Shelby, for Stephens.

Michael M. Lakin, for Minowicz.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of December 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."