alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(i)

Certification

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND INTERIM CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

OF ATMOSPHERIC GLOW TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Atmospheric Glow Technologies, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the undersigneds knowledge:



| | 1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: July 16, 2007



/s/ W. Scott McDonaldW. Scott McDonald, Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Accounting Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is not being filed as part of the
Report or as a separate disclosure document.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 676/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 676/2013 of 16 July 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 676/2013                     

# of 16 July 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 July 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeffery L. MANESS.

No. 517P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

Jeffery L. Maness, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th day of September 2006 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Moore County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 5th day of October 2006."
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines; Request for 
Nominations for Voting Members

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Health Resources and Services Administration is amending a 
notice that appeared in the Federal Register of July 8, 2005, FR Doc. 
13422, pages 39517-38518, requesting nominations for voting members to 
fill three vacancies on the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines. 
The deadline date for receiving nominations was on or before August 8, 
2005. This document amends the notice by extending the deadline date 
for receiving nominations.

DATES: The agency must receive nominations on or before September 16, 
2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cheryl Lee at 301-443-2124 or e-
mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f7949b9292b79f858496d9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c1a2ada4a481a9b3b2a0efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 18, 2005.
Tina M. Cheatham,
Director, Division of Policy Review and Coordination.
[FR Doc. 05-16789 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
OAKLEY v. BARKLEY.

No. COA05-367.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Pasquotank (02CVS138)

Case without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
SCHENKEL & SHULTZ v. FOX & ASSO.

No. 631A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 10, 2007.

Samuel T. Reaves, Charlotte, Herbert W. Hamilton, Christi P. Cox, for Schenkel & Shultz.

Katherine Jane Allen, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Troy Chivers.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of January 2007 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Fox & Associates) shall have up to and including the 23rd day of January 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of January 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC. v. E. Norris TOLSON, Secretary of Revenue of the State of North Carolina.

No. 191P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Charles B. Neely, Jr., Nancy S. Rendleman, Kevin W. Benedict, Raleigh, David A.

*232Agosto, New York, NY, for Philip Morris USA.

Kay Linn Miller Hobart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for E. Norris Tolson.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff on the 11th day of April 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of April 2006 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
(Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) I, Michael C. Brant, certify that:  6.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Roadhouse Grill, Inc. (the Registrant);7.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this annual report;8.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this annual report;9.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officers and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and
we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;b)
    
    Intentionally omitted;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the
Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this annual report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this annual report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this annual report any
change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the
Registrants most recent fiscal year that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and  10.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officers and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrants auditors and the audit committee of
Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: August 6, 2004/s/ Michael C. BrantMichael C. BrantExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer F-39
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          11,352
<SECURITIES>                                     3,064
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,454
<INVENTORY>                                     15,211
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,463
<PP&E>                                          27,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,293
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,161
<SALES>                                         47,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,360
<CGS>                                           31,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,132
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,646
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,486
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (194)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT  FURNISHED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned,  Geoffrey Alison,  is the Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer of Castle & Morgan Holdings, Inc. (the "Company").

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company
of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,
2006 (the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

  a.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
       15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
       78o(d)) and

  b.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.


      /s/ Geoffrey Alison
      ---------------------
      Geoffrey Alison, Chief Executive Officer
      and Principal Financial Officer

      Date:  April 26, 2006


      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Jonathon HELSIUS v. Elwanda S. ROBERTSON and County of Durham.

No. 698P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

Curtis Massey, Assistant County Attorney, for County of Durham.

Robert D. McClanahan, Durham, for Jonathan Helsius.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Respondent (County of Durham) on the 20th day of December 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Petitioner (Helsius), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of December 2005 by Respondent (County of Durham) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5664 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5664

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to update at least once every six years the plans and 
 specifications for specially adapted housing furnished to veterans by 
                             the Secretary.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR REGULAR UPDATES TO HANDBOOK FOR DESIGN 
              FURNISHED TO VETERANS ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIALLY ADAPTED 
              HOUSING ASSISTANCE BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 2103 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting ``(a) Plans 
        and Specifications.--The Secretary''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Handbook for Design.--The Secretary shall make available to 
veterans eligible for assistance under this chapter, without cost to 
the veterans, a handbook containing appropriate designs for specially 
adapted housing. The Secretary shall update such handbook at least once 
every six years to take into account any new or unique disabilities, 
including vision impairments, impairments specific to the of upper 
limbs, and burn injuries.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5664

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs to update at least once every six years the plans and 
 specifications for specially adapted housing furnished to veterans by 
                             the Secretary.
```
STATE v. Thomas Larry HERBIN.

No. 243P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Chrisopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, William David McFadyen, Jr., District Attorney.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of May 2006 by Defendant to Proceed as Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of August 2006."
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3035

AN ACT

To temporarily extend the programs under the Higher 

Education Act of 1965.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 3035 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PRO2 GRAMS. 

3 (a) EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS.—Section 2(a) of the 

4 Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 (Public Law 

5 109–81; 20 U.S.C. 1001 note) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘May 31, 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2008’’. 

7 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec8 tion, or in the Higher Education Extension Act of 2005 

9 as amended by this Act, shall be construed to limit or oth10 erwise alter the authorizations of appropriations for, or 

11 the durations of, programs contained in the amendments 

12 made by the Higher Education Reconciliation Act of 2005 

13 (Public Law 109–171), by the College Cost Reduction and 

14 Access Act (Public Law 110–84), or by the Ensuring Con15 tinued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008 (Public Law 

16 110–227) to the provisions of the Higher Education Act 

17 of 1965 and the Taxpayer-Teacher Protection Act of 

18 2004. 

Passed the Senate May 20, 2008. 

Attest:

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3035

AN ACT

To temporarily extend the programs under the 

Higher Education Act of 1965.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6634
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROGER LEE HARRELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CR-01-112) Submitted: July 31, 2003 Decided: August 12, 2003 Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger Lee Harrell, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari, James Brien Comey, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Roger Lee Harrell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of a previous order denying his motion to stay a state court proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. SeeUnited States v. Harrell , No. CR-01-112 (E.D. Va. Apr. 8, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
STATE v. HARLEE.

No. COA06-593.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from New Hanover (04CRS69507).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131568 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131568 COA: 261371 Wayne CC: 04-009472-01 STEVEN WILSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the May 9, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk