alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                           6,776
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                       213
<INVENTORY>                                      5,946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,137
<PP&E>                                          32,991
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  76,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,742
<BONDS>                                         72,676
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,018)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    76,143
<SALES>                                         14,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,217
<CGS>                                            2,877
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,031)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,031)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,031)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.71)


</TABLE>
# Commission Directive 2013/8/EU (repealed)Show full title

Commission Directive 2013/8/EU of 26 February 2013 amending, for the purpose of adapting its technical provisions, Directive            2009/144/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain components and characteristics of wheeled agricultural            or forestry tractors (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Directive 2013/8/EU                     

# of 26 February 2013

# amending, for the purpose of adapting its technical provisions, Directive 2009/144/EC of the European Parliament and of the                        Council on certain components and characteristics of wheeled agricultural or forestry tractors                     

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Regulation (EU) No 167/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 February 2013 on the approval and market surveillance                                 of agricultural and forestry vehicles Text with EEA relevance.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1107/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1107/2013 of 5 November 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Carne de Bravo do Ribatejo (PDO)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1107/2013                     

# of 5 November 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Carne de Bravo                        do Ribatejo (PDO)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 entered into force on 3 January                              2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications                              and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs(2).

(2)Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Carne de Bravo do Ribatejo’                              was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Carne de Bravo do Ribatejo’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.1.****Fresh meat (and offal)**U.K.

#### PORTUGALU.K.

Carne de Bravo do Ribatejo (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.                           

3

OJ C 353, 17.11.2012, p. 18.
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Roslyn Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael P. Puorro,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     for the periods presented in the Report.

/s/ Michael P. Puorro
------------------------
Michael P. Puorro
Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 2003
Exhibit 32.2





TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.





OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended February 28, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Douglas E. Sloan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.
The Report is in full compliances with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Douglas E. SloanDouglas E. SloanChief Financial OfficerApril 14, 2011
Debbie C. WILLIAMS and Ashley Nicole Williams v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 712PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2006.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 621 S.E.2d 644 (2005), affirming an order granting summary judgment entered 27 May 2004 by Judge Russell J. Lanier, Jr. in Superior Court, Lenoir County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 September 2006.

Wyrick, Robbins, Yates, & Ponton, LLP, by K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, and White & Allen, P.A., by Matthew S. Sullivan, Kinston, for plaintiff-appellees.

George L. Simpson, III, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

Larcade, Heiskell & Askew, PLLC, by Roger A. Askew and Jodee S. Larcade, Raleigh, for the North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae.

Maynard & Harris Attorneys at Law, PLLC, by C. Douglas Maynard, Jr., Winston-Salem, and Holly M. Bryan, Raleigh, for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 4.18      CONSENT OF CLÉMENT DOMBROWSKI   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2013 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Clément Dombrowski, staff member of Anglo American Exploration (Canada) Ltd., participated in the preparation of the technical report entitled Technical Report and Recommendations, 2012 Exploration Program, Payne Bay Property, Québec, Anglo American Exploration (Canada) Ltd.  Virginia Mines Inc. completed in March 2013 (the Report), concerning mineralized material in the Payne Bay property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings Item III  Description of the Business  3.7.4 Geological Setting; 3.7.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.7.6 Mineralization in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2013 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,     /S/ Clément DombrowskiName:
Clément Dombrowski
M.Sc.A, P.Geo., Senior Geologist   May 13, 2013
STATE v. GILBERT.

No. COA06-16.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Gaston (04CRS64133, 04CRS18296, 04CRS18297, 04CRS64779, 04CRS26161).

Case reported without published opinion. No error as to trial; vacated in part and remanded for resentencing.
# L_2013208EN.01007301.xml

| 2.8.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 208/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 208/73

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 176 of 27 June 2013
  )

On page 423, the second subparagraph of Article 162(1):

for:

‘Member States shall apply those provisions from 31 December 2013.’,

read:

‘Member States shall apply those provisions from 1 January 2014.’;

on page 423, Article 162(3):

for:

‘...for services provided or performance from the year 2014 onwards, whether due on the basis of contracts concluded before or after 31 December 2013.’,

read:

‘...for services provided or performance from the year 2014 onwards, whether due on the basis of contracts concluded before or after 1 January 2014.’;

on page 424, Article 162(6):

for:

‘By way of derogation from paragraph 2 of this Article, Article 133 shall apply from 31 December 2013.’,

read:

‘By way of derogation from paragraph 2 of this Article, Article 133 shall apply from 1 January 2014.’.

---
CANNON & CO., LLP v. ESTATE OF ALEXANDER.

No. COA06-1019.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007.

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Davie (04CVS466).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
VAN REYPEN v. TEETER.

No. 84PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2006.

Charles M. Viser, Charlotte, for Van Reypen Associates, Inc.

D. Lane Matthews, Charlotte, for Gerald Teeter, et al.

Isaac T. Avery, III, Raleigh, for NC Asso. Police Attorneys.

Kimberly N. Overton, for NC Conference of DA.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of June 2006 by Attorney General for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of June 2006."
CARUSO v. HENNESSY

No. COA06-646.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from Onslow (03CVS2592).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 10908 Summary Cal endar

**____________ Benny R. Odem, Jr.,** 
Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus
**Frances M. Odom,** Unit Property Officer **; Kelly M. Brown,** Unit Property Officer **; Samantha K. Sullivan,** AD Review (Investigator 2) **,** Defendants

— Appellees

**.**

**__________ ____________________**  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:20

- CV

- 42

**______________________________** Before **Wiener ,**  **Elrod ,**  and **Engelhardt ,**  Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  ***** Benny Odem, Jr., an inmate incarcerated by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice , appeals the district court ’s dismissal with prejudice of his complaint for failure to state a claim, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 7, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10908 Document: 00516778298 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2023No. 22

- 10908

2 In his complaint, Odem alleged that three Texas Department of Criminal Justice employees deprived him of due process , confiscated o r destroyed several items of his personal property , and did not properly handle his grievance regarding the confiscation of his property

. As the district court determined , Texas provides an adequate post

- deprivation remedy for loss of property, so Odem’s property deprivation claim, even when taken as true, fails to state a constitutional violation. Murphy v. Collins , 26 F.3d 541, 543

- 44 (5th Cir. 1994). Odem also ha d no federally protected interest in having his grievance resolved to his satisfaction. Hill v. Walker , 718 F . Appx. 243, 250 (5th Cir. 2018) (citing Geiger v. Jowers , 404 F.3d 371, 37 3

- 374 (5th Cir. 2005)

. Th is court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs and pertinent portions of the record. Having found no reversible error, we **AFFIRM**

. Case: 22-10908 Document: 00516778298 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2023
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 164 (Thursday, August 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49946]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16878]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Advisory 
Commission; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act that a meeting of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National 
Historical Park Advisory Commission will be held at 9:30 a.m. on 
Friday, September 9, 2005, Rockwood Manor, Brooke Hall, Potomac, 
Maryland
    The Commission was established by Public Law 91-664 to meet and 
consult with the Secretary of the Interior on general policies and 
specific matters related to the administration and development of the 
Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park.
    The members of the Commission are as follows:

Mrs. Sheila Rabb Weidenfeld, Chairman
Mr. Charles J. Weir
Mr. Barry A. Passett
Mr. Terry W. Hepburn
Ms. Elise B. Heinz
Ms. JoAnn M. Spevacek
Mrs. Mary E. Woodward
Mrs. Donna Printz
Mrs. Ferial S. Bishop
Ms. Nancy C. Long
Mrs. Jo Reynolds
Dr. James H. Gilford
Ms. Sue Ann Sullivan
Brother James Kirkpatrick

    Topics that will be presented during the meeting include:
    1. Update on park planning and design projects
    2. Update on major construction/ development projects
    3. Update on partnership projects
    4. Review draft Environmental Assessment for Georgetown Boathouse 
proposal
    The meeting will be open to the public. Any member of the public 
may file with the Commission a written statement concerning the matters 
to be discussed. Persons wishing further information concerning this 
meeting, or who wish to submit written Statements, may contact Kevin 
Brandt, Superintendent, C&O Canal National Historic Park, 1850 Dual 
Highway, Suite 100, Hagerstown, Maryland 21740.
    Minutes of the meeting will be available for public inspection six 
weeks after the meeting at park headquarters, Hagerstown, Maryland.

    Dated: July 21, 2005.
Robert Hartman,
Superintendent, Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park.
[FR Doc. 05-16878 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-M
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16820]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration


Center for Substance Abuse Treatment; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of the 
meeting of the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) National 
Advisory Council in September 14, 2005.
    A portion of the meeting will be open and include discussion of the 
Center's policy issues, and current administrative, legislative, and 
program developments.
    Attendance by the public will be limited to space available. Public 
comments are welcome. Please communicate with the contact individual 
listed below to make arrangements to comment or to request special 
accommodations for persons with disabilities.
    Substantive program information and a roster of Council members may 
be obtained by accessing the SAMHSA Advisory Council Web site (http://www.samhsa.gov) as soon as possible after the meeting, or by 
communicating with the contact whose name and telephone number are 
listed below.
    Committee Name: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 
Administration Center for Substance Abuse Treatment National Advisory 
Council Meeting Dates: September 14--9 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Place: 1 Choke Cherry Road, Sugar Loaf and Seneca Conference Rooms, 
Rockville, Maryland 20857.
    Type: Open: September 14--9 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Contact: Cynthia Graham, M.S., Executive Secretary, SAMHSA/CSAT 
National Advisory Council, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 5-1036, Rockville, 
MD 20857, Telephone: (240) 276-1692, FAX: (240) 276-1690, E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#22415b4c564a4b430c4550434a434f6251434f4a51430c4a4a510c454d54"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3152485f455958501f56435059505c7142505c5942501f5959421f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: August 15, 2005.
Toian Vaughn,
Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health 
Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 05-16820 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4162-20-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### RIDGEWAY v. UNITED STATES.

No. 11835.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

July 2, 1953.

Charles S. Dautel, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Vincent Fordell, Detroit, Mich., for ap-pellee.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and Mc-ALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal, having been heard on the record, briefs and argument of counsel for respective parties;

And it appearing that on January 4, 1952 a plea of Not Guilty was entered for appellant upon his standing mute upon arraignment; that on January 22, 1952, appellant in open Court and represented by counsel of his own choosing, withdrew his plea of Not Guilty and entered a plea of Guilty to the indictment herein, and at that time stated to the Court that no one had made any promises or threats to him to cause him to plead guilty; that sentence was postponed until February 28, 1952, at which time, following a plea for leniency by his attorney, but without any denial of guilt or request that the plea of Guilty be withdrawn, he received a sentence of three ye ars imprisonment; and that it was not until October 17, 1952 that his present motion 1:o vacate the sentence was filed, which contains the allegation, among others, that the plea of Guilty was entered upon the advice oí his counsel who stated to him that he would receive a probated sentence;

And the Court being of the opinion that siich alleged grounds are not legally sufficient to cause the judgment herein to be vacated; Crowe v. United States, 4 Cir., 175 F.2d 799; and do not constitute “manifest injustice” authorizing the District Court to permit a withdrawal of the plea of Guilty after sentence; Rule 32(d), Fed. Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.; United States v. Weese, 2 Cir., 145 F.2d 135; United States v. Searle, 7 Cir., 180 F.2d 209; Futterman v. United States, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 331, 202 F.2d 185.

And being also of the opinion that appellant’s' plea of Guilty was not qualified or contradicted by his statement to the Court at the time it was made and was acquiesced in by his counsel at the time of sentence, and is not similar to the situation in Bergen v. United States, 8 Cir., 145 F.2d 181, relied upon by appellant; See Brown v. United States, 8 Cir., 182 F.2d 933; Alred v. United States, 4 Cir., 177 F.2d 193.

It is ordered that the judgment of the' District Court overruling the motion to vacate, is sustained.