alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                    Exhibit 11.1
                               ASCENT PEDIATRICS, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  BASIC (1)(2)
                                                                  ------------
<S>                                                               <C> 
For the year ended December 31, 1998:
    Common stock outstanding, beginning of the period                6,893,332
    Weighted average common stock issued during the period              46,016
                                                                   ----------- 
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding             6,939,348
                                                                   =========== 

    Net loss per common share                                      $     (2.69)
                                                                   =========== 
For the year ended December 31, 1997:
    Common stock outstanding, beginning of the period                  198,155
    Weighted average common stock issued during the period           3,935,913
                                                                   ----------- 
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding             4,134,068
                                                                   =========== 

    Net loss per common share                                      $     (3.08)
                                                                   =========== 
For the year ended December 31, 1996:
    Common stock outstanding, beginning of the period                  197,837
    Weighted average common stock issued during the period                 254
                                                                   ----------- 
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding               198,091
                                                                   =========== 

    Net loss per common share                                      $    (33.44)
                                                                   =========== 
</TABLE>

(1) All shares have been restated to reflect a 0.85-for-one reverse stock
    split. See Note J to the Financial Statements of Ascent included in Ascent's
    Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998. 

(2) The number of shares outstanding for basic net loss per common share is the 
    same as those for diluted net loss per common share.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 12, 2008
    By:
    /s/ James C. MastandreaJames C. MastandreaChairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1
                       New York Regional Rail Corporation

                Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
      As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of New York Regional Rail  Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Donald
B. Hutton,  Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify to the
best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Donald B. Hutton
Donald B. Hutton, Chief Executive Officer
Principal Executive Officer

May 19, 2005



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to New York Regional Rail  Corporation and will be retained by New York
Regional  Rail   Corporation  and  furnished  to  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                       0
<SALES>                                         39,122                  36,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,122                  36,098
<CGS>                                           25,145                  22,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,452                  30,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (104)                     147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,774                   5,274
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,619                   2,049
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,155                   3,225
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,155                   3,225
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50                    0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47                    0.38
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Ruben Aburto DIAZ.

No. 581P03-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Ruben Abuto Diaz, Pro Se.

Joan M. Cunningham, David J. Adinoilfi, II, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th day of April 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket Nos. 30-5980 and 30-5982; ASLBP No. 04-833-07-MLA]

                    Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.321, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board in the above captioned                     *Safety Light Corporation*                     proceeding is hereby reconstituted by appointing Administrative Judge Alan S. Rosenthal in place of Administrative Judge Ann M. Young.                

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.302, henceforth all correspondence, documents, and other material relating to any matter in this proceeding over which this Licensing Board has jurisdiction should be served on Administrative Judge Rosenthal as follows: Administrative Judge Alan S. Rosenthal, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,Washington, DC 20555-0001.

Issued at Rockville, Maryland, this 25th day of January 2005.

G. Paul Bollwerk, III,

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.

[FR Doc. 05-1687 Filed 1-28-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
# L_2012349EN.01005301.xml

| 19.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 349/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 349/53

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1228/2012

of 18 December 2012

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of December 2012 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 for poultrymeat

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat (3), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of December 2012 for the subperiod from 1 January to 31 March 2013 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged for the subperiod from 1 January to 31 March 2013 under Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 December 2012.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

3

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Order No | Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.1.2013-31.3.2013
  (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 09.4410 | 0,29533 |
| 2 | 09.4411 | 0,304506 |
| 3 | 09.4412 | 0,327761 |
| 4 | 09.4420 | 0,398565 |
| 6 | 09.4422 | 0,400962 |

Group No

Order No

Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.1.2013-31.3.2013

(%)

1

09.4410

0,29533

2

09.4411

0,304506

3

09.4412

0,327761

4

09.4420

0,398565

6

09.4422

0,400962

---
#### In the Matter of Russell Jenkins, Appellant, v Denise McKinney, Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 904]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Richardson, J.), dated October 25, 2004, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Borofsky, S.M.), dated September 21, 2004, which, after a hearing, dismissed his petition, without prejudice, for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the father’s objection to the order of the Support Magistrate. Contrary to the father’s contention, a court cannot reduce or annul child support arrears accrued before the making of an application to modify child support *(see*Family Ct Act § 451; *Miller v Miller,*308 AD2d 541 [2003]; *O’Connor v Curcio,*281 AD2d 100, 102 [2001]; *Howfield v Howfield,*250 AD2d 573 [1998]; *Matter of McCaffrey v McCaffrey, 134*AD2d 430, 431 [1987]). Cozier, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,622
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,202
<ALLOWANCES>                                        41
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         102,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         25,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,863
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,541
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,802
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,802
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                          132
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,670
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
        

</TABLE>
STEIN v. BOARD OF EDUCATION.

No. 128A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Michael J. Barnett, Hickory, for Cooperative Learning Center, et al.

Mark A. Leach, Winston-Salem, Leslie O. Wickham, Jr., Durham, for Stein and Hootstein.

Richard Schwartz, Raleigh, Michael Delafield, for Asheville City Bd. of Education.

K. Dean Shatley, II, Asheville, for Buncombe County Bd. of Education.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of May 2005 by Defendants to Amend New Brief and Alternative Motion to File an Addendum to New Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2005."
Exhibit 99.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Relating to a Periodic Report Containing Financial Statements

---

I,
Jeffrey A. Snider, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Deborah S. Maddocks, Vice PresidentFinance, of PAULA Financial, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), each hereby
certifies that:

(1)    The
Company's periodic report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)    The
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

*            *            *

|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER    |  | VICE PRESIDENTFINANCE    
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|                           |  |                           
|/s/JEFFREY A. SNIDER       |  | /s/DEBORAH S. MADDOCKS    
|Jeffrey A. Snider          |  | Deborah S. Maddocks       
|Date:    November 14, 2002 |  | Date:    November 14, 2002

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Optics  Electronics,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, John
Cousins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     3.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

     4.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                                  /S/ JOHN COUSINS
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  April 13, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3030 

To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 to provide for the 

conveyance to the United States of certain non-Federal land to be used 

by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for the construction of a veterans 

medical facility. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 19, 2008 

Mr. ALLARD (for himself and Mr. SALAZAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 to 

provide for the conveyance to the United States of certain non-Federal land to be used by the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs for the construction of a veterans medical facility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN NON-FEDERAL 

4 LAND. 

5 Section 410 of title IV of division I of the Consoli6 dated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110–161; 

7 121 Stat. 2276) is amended to read as follows: 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•S 3030 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 410. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN NON-FEDERAL LAND. 

2 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

3 ‘‘(1) CITY.—The term ‘City’ means the City of 

4 Aurora, Colorado. 

5 ‘‘(2) DEED.—The term ‘deed’ means the quit6 claim deed— 

7 ‘‘(A) conveyed to the City by the Secretary 

8 (acting through the Director of the National 

9 Park Service); and 

10 ‘‘(B) dated May 24, 1999. 

11 ‘‘(3) NON-FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘non12 Federal land’ means— 

13 ‘‘(A) parcel I of the former United States 

14 Army Garrison Fitzsimons, Adams County, Col15 orado, as more specifically described in the 

16 deed; and 

17 ‘‘(B) the parcel of land described in the 

18 deed. 

19 ‘‘(4) SECRETARY.—The term ‘Secretary’ means 

20 the Secretary of the Interior. 

21 ‘‘(b) DUTY OF SECRETARY.—To allow the City to 

22 convey by donation to the United States the non-Federal 

23 land to be used by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for 

24 the construction of a veterans medical facility, not later 

25 than 60 days after the date of enactment of this section, 

26 the Secretary shall execute each instrument that is necVerDate Aug 31 2005 23:31 May 19, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3030.IS S3030

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•S 3030 IS

1 essary to release all rights, conditions, and restrictions re2 tained by the United States in and to the non-Federal land 

3 conveyed in the deed.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
STATE v. LOFTON.

COA05-1231.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (03CRS21132, 03CRS21133, 03CRS59427, 03CRS59428)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
HELMS v. HELMS.

No. COA05-1346.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 15, 2006.

Certification Date September 5, 2006.

Appeal from Pender (04CVD396).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
IN RE K.M.M.

No. COA06-494

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Gaston (05J180).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.