alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Council Decision of 2 December 2013 establishing the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Ministerial            Conference of the World Trade Organization on the accession of the Republic of Yemen to the World Trade Organization (2013/715/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 2 December 2013

# establishing the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Ministerial Conference of the World Trade                        Organization on the accession of the Republic of Yemen to the World Trade Organization                     

# (2013/715/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 91, Article 100(2) and the                           first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(9), thereof,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)On 12 April 2000, the Government of the Republic of Yemen applied for accession to the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the                              World Trade Organization (WTO), pursuant to Article XII of that Agreement.

(2)A Working Party on the accession of the Republic of Yemen was established on 17 and 19 July 2000 in order to reach agreement                              on terms of accession acceptable to the Republic of Yemen and all WTO Members.

(3)The Commission, on behalf of the Union, has negotiated a comprehensive series of market opening commitments on the part of                              the Republic of Yemen which satisfy the Union’s requests.

(4)Those commitments are now embodied in the Protocol of Accession of the Republic of Yemen to the WTO.

(5)Accession to the WTO is expected to make a positive and lasting contribution to the process of economic reform and sustainable                              development in the Republic of Yemen.

(6)The Protocol of Accession should therefore be approved.

(7)Article XII of the Agreement establishing the WTO provides that the terms of accession are to be agreed between the acceding                              Member and the WTO, and that the Ministerial Conference of the WTO approves the terms of accession on the WTO side.

(8)Accordingly, it is appropriate to establish the position to be adopted on the Union’s behalf within the Ministerial Conference                              of the WTO on the accession of the Republic of Yemen to the WTO,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Ministerial Conference of the WTO on the accession of                     the Republic of Yemen to the WTO is to approve the accession.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

E. Gustas
# C_2013201EN.01000201.xml

| 13.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 26 June 2013

adopting the Council's position on draft amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2013

2013/C 201/03

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1), and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| — | the Union's budget for the financial year 2013 was definitively adopted on 12 December 2012 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union's budget for the financial year 2013 was definitively adopted on 12 December 2012 (2),

2

| — | on 18 March 2013, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 1 to the general budget for the financial year 2013, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 18 March 2013, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 1 to the general budget for the financial year 2013,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2013 was adopted on 26 June 2013.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 26 June 2013.

For the Council

The President

M. NOONAN

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1,

1

(2)  OJ L 66, 8.3.2013, p. 1, with corrigendum in OJ L 134, 18.5.2013, p. 21.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,073
<PP&E>                                         278,381
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 401,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,838
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           301
<OTHER-SE>                                     216,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   401,388
<SALES>                                        222,103
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               222,103
<CGS>                                          103,343
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,343
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               142,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (32,528)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       786
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,314)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.11)


</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3099 

To prohibit the use of funds by the Department of Defense for propaganda 

purposes within the United States not otherwise specifically authorized 

by law. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2008 

Mr. KERRY (for himself, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. DORGAN, and Mr. LAUTENBERG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds by the Department of Defense 

for propaganda purposes within the United States not 

otherwise specifically authorized by law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITIONS RELATING TO PROPAGANDA. 

4 (a) PROHIBITION.—No funds appropriated or other5 wise made available by any Act may be used by the De6 partment of Defense for propaganda purposes within the 

7 United States not otherwise specifically authorized by law. 

8 (b) REPORTS.—Not later than 90 days after the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act, the Inspector General of the 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3099 IS

1 Department of Defense and the Comptroller General of 

2 the United States shall each conduct a study of, and sub3 mit to Congress a report on, the extent to which the De4 partment of Defense has violated the prohibition on propa5 ganda established in section 8001 of Public Laws 107– 

6 117, 107–248, 108–87, 108–287, 109–148, 109–289, and 

7 110–116, the Department of Defense Appropriations Acts 

8 for fiscal years 2002 through 2008. 

9 (c) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

10 term ‘‘propaganda’’ means any form of communication in 

11 support of national objectives designed to influence the 

12 opinions, emotions, attitudes, or behavior of the people of 

13 the United States in order to benefit the sponsor, either 

14 directly or indirectly. 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Stuart Wayne TOMPKINS.

No. 348P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Stuart Wayne Tompkins, Pro Se.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*59*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 30th day of June 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
STATE v. McGEE

No. COA06-830.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from Wake (04CRS76582, 04CRS76583, 04CRS76584, 04CRS76585).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board
of Directors


Pacific
Biomarkers, Inc.


Seattle,
Washington





We
consent to the use of our audit report dated September 23, 2010, on the
financial statements of Pacific Biomarkers, Inc., for the filing with and
attachment to the Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, and for
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Pacific Biomarkers,
Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-23497, 333-109795 and 333-153705).





/s/ PMB
Helin Donovan, LLP





PMB Helin
Donovan, LLP


CERTIFIED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Spokane,
WA





September
23, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Dril-Quip, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, J. Mike Walker, Co-Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|                                                           
|/S/    J. MIKE
WALKER                                      
|J. Mike Walker Co-Chief Executive Officer February 25,
2010
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3082 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2008 

Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1700 Cleveland Avenue in Kansas City, Missouri, as the ‘‘Reverend Earl Abel Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

S 3082 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. REVEREND EARL ABEL POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1700 Cleveland Avenue in Kan5 sas City, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Reverend Earl Abel Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Reverend Earl Abel 

11 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate June 27, 2008. 

Attest: NANCY ERICKSON, 

Secretary. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
STATE v. MANESS

No. COA06-940

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Richmond (05CRS50364, 05CRS50365, 05CRS50366, 05CRS50390).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
| 1. | The      Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009      (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the      Corporation. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date: May 1,      2009 |  /s/      Carol K. Nelson                   |
|------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |  Carol K.      Nelson, President and CEO                                                                                              |
|                         |                                                                                                                                       |
|                         |  /s/ Lars H. Johnson                                  |
|                         |  Lars      H. Johnson, Chief FinancialOfficer                                                                                         |

----
[Cite as State v. Smith, 2020-Ohio-1443.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO 

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : 

 CASE NO. 2020-P-0020

 - vs - : 

MICHAEL A. SMITH, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2016 CR 00513. 

Judgment: Dismissed. 

Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, 

OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). 

Michael A. Smith, pro se, PID# 762-940, Trumbull Correctional Institution, 5701 Burnett 

Road, P.O. Box 901, Leavittsburg, OH 44430 (Defendant-Appellant). 

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J. 

{¶1} On February 25, 2020, appellant, Michael A. Smith, pro se, filed a “Motion 

to file Appeal on Sentence,” construed as a motion for leave to file a delayed appeal, 

pursuant to App.R. 5(A). No notice of appeal was filed in the trial court, and no 

judgment entry for which appellant appeals was provided. 

{¶2} App.R. 5(A) provides: 
2

{¶3} “After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for the 

filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with leave 

of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases: 

{¶4} “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * * 

{¶5} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals 

and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of 

right. Concurrently with the filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the 

trial court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of 

the notice of the appeal in the court of appeals. * * *.” (Emphasis added.) 

{¶6} In the present case, appellant’s motion is defective for the following 

reasons: 1) appellant’s motion does not set forth any reasons for filing an untimely 

appeal; and 2) no notice of appeal was filed in the trial court concurrently with the filing 

of the motion for leave to appeal in this court. Further, no appealed judgment entry was 

provided pursuant to Loc.R. 3(D)(2). 

{¶7} Accordingly, because appellant’s present motion is procedurally defective, 

it is hereby overruled. 

{¶8} We note that appellant is not barred from filing a new motion for leave to 

file a delayed appeal that complies with the App.R. 5(A) and the local rules of this court 

by filing a notice of appeal with the trial with an attached judgment entry on appeal. 

{¶9} This matter is dismissed. 

MATT LYNCH, J., 

MARY JANE TRAPP, J., 

concur.
Exhibit 21.1

Sabre Holdings Corporation  Subsidiaries

(All subsidiaries are wholly owned unless otherwise noted in parenthesis. Each subsidiary's subsidiaries outlined further below.)

Sabre
Holdings Corporation SUBSIDIARY



Sabre Inc.
SUBSIDIARIES



GetThere Inc.
SUBSIDIARIES



GetThere
L.P. (Delaware) (2.5% Limited Partner)

1

---



GetThere
L.P. SUBSIDIARY



Greyhound
Acquisition Corp SUBSIDIARY



Sabre
Travel International Limited SUBSIDIARY



Sabre
Decision Technologies International, Inc. SUBSIDIARIES



Airline
Technology Services Mauritius Ltd. SUBSIDIARY



Sabre
International, Inc. SUBSIDIARIES



Sabre
China Sea Technologies Ltd. SUBSIDIARY



Sabre
Australia Technologies I Pty Limited SUBSIDIARY



2

---



Sabre
Pacific Pty Limited SUBSIDIARY



Sabre
Holdings GmbH SUBSIDIARIES



Sabre
Deutschland Marketing GmbH SUBIDIARY



Sabre
Marketing Nederland B.V. SUBSIDIARY



Sabre
Sverige AB SUBSIDIARIES



Sabre
International Holdings, Inc. SUBSIDIARIES



Sabre
Investments, Inc. SUBSIDIARIES



Sabre
InvestmentsPK-1, Inc. SUBSIDIARY



SabreMark
G.P., Inc. SUBSIDIARY



SabreMark
L.P., Inc. SUBSIDIARY



Sabre
Soluciones de Viaje S. de R.L. de C.V. SUBSIDIARIES



Sabre
Sociedad Tecnologica S.A. de C.V. SUBSIDIARY



Sabre
Technology Enterprises, Ltd. SUBSIDIARIES

3

---





Sabre
Technology Enterprises II, Ltd. SUBSIDIARY



Sabre
Technology Holland B.V. SUBSIDIARIES



SynXis
Corporation SUBSIDIARIES



SynXis
International Holdings B.V. SUBSIDIARY



Travelocity
Holdings, Inc. SUBSIDIARY



Travelocity.com Inc.
SUBSIDIARIES



Travelocity.com
LP Sub Inc. SUBSIDIARY



Travelocity
GmbH SUBSIDIARIES



Travelocity
Sabre GmbH SUBSIDIARIES



Resfeber
Sverige AB SUBSIDIARIES



USIT
Connections SAS SUBSIDIARY



4

---



QuickLinks
STATE v. Derrick WHEELER.

No. 371P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2006.

R. Marcus Lodge, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th day of October 2006 by Defendant to Order Subpeona Duces Tecum:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of December 2006."
S. 3029

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To provide for an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small 

Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION 

OF PROGRAMS UNDER THE SMALL BUSINESS ACT AND 

THE SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to 

extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business 

Administration’’, approved October 10, 2006 (Public Law 109–316; 

120 Stat. 1742), as most recently amended by section 1 of Public 

Law 110–136 (121 Stat. 1453), is amended by striking ‘‘May 23, 

2008’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘March 20, 2009’’. 

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by subsection (a) 

shall take effect on May 22, 2008.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
STATE v. Lester DISTANCE.

No. 322P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of June 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

*906"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of November 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          98,397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,458
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      51,569,984
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,319,925
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              51,015,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,336,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,519
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,647,329
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                51,015,637
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,444,889
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,515,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,295,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,406,913)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,406,913)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.04)


</TABLE>