alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Antonio Demetrius WILSON.

No. 370P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Antonio D. Wilson, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Michael Parker, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th day of July 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Stanly County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
exv10w4



 






Exhibit 10.4




[MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. LETTERHEAD]




(Date)



(Name)

(Address)




Global ID Number: XXX-XX-ACCT



Dear (Name):



We are pleased to notify you that the Board of Directors of Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) has granted you the following Stock Option Award.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Grant Date	 	Granted from Mindspeed Plan	 	Option Type	 	Option Price	 	Number of Options
	(Date)

	 	2003 Long-Term Incentives Plan
	 	(Incentive Stock

Option or

Non-Qualified)
	 	(Price)
	 	(Options)





This Stock Option Award (this “Award”) has been granted pursuant to, and is controlled by: (i) the
Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. 2003 Long-Term Incentives Plan (the “Plan”); (ii) the Stock Option
Terms and Conditions (the “Plan Terms”); and (iii) this Award. This Award may be exercised only
upon the terms and conditions of the Plan and the Plan Terms. The Plan and the Plan Terms are
incorporated into this Award as if fully set forth herein.



The options may be exercised, in whole or in part (but only for a whole number of shares) and at
one time or from time to time per the vesting schedule below. All exercises must take place at
least one day prior to the expiration of the Option. The number of shares you may purchase as of
any date cannot exceed the total number of shares vested by that date, less any shares you have
previously acquired by exercising this Option.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Vesting Schedule	 	 
	 

	 	(monthly, quarterly, semi-annually, annual, specified dates or cliff vesting based upon continued employment)	 	 





All documents relating to this Award are available for viewing and printing on the Human Resources
Department Website. To access this information, please go to Mindspeed MyNet, select Directory,
Site Directory, Human Resources, Stock Administration. The documents available for viewing and
printing at this website location are the Plan, the Plan Terms, the most recent Plan Prospectus,
the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company’s Insider Trading Policy. If
you choose not to download these documents, if you do not have access to Mindspeed MyNet or if you
encounter problems accessing this site, please contact Stock Administration at (949) 579-4525 or
stock.admin@mindspeed.com to receive paper copies of these documents at no cost. Please read all
documents carefully.



If you have any questions regarding this grant, please contact Stock Administration at (949)
579-4525 or via email at stock.admin@mindspeed.com.




	 	 	 
	 

	 	MINDSPEED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
IN RE A.B.

No. COA06-368.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Johnston (05J99).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
EX-10.11(a)



 Exhibit 10.11(a) 

First Amendment to Loan and 

Security Agreement 
 This
First Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement (“First Amendment”) is dated as of June 30, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), by and among (i) Modern Round, Inc., a Nevada limited liability company
(“Borrower”), (ii) Black Powder Management, L.L.C., a Nevada limited liability company (“Black Powder”), and (iii) BK Entertainment, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company (“BK
Entertainment”) and together with Black Powder, each, a (“Lender”), and collectively, the (“Parties”). 

WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a Loan and Security Agreement on May 11, 2016 (the “Agreement”), and, 

WHEREAS, the Parties hereby agree to expand the Maximum Commitment of the Agreement in accordance with the terms of the Agreement as well as the terms
provided herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein each of Maker and Holder mutually covenant and agree as
follows: 
  

	 	•	 	The Maximum Available as set forth in the Agreement is increased to $2,000,000 

  

	 	•	 	This First Amendment binds and benefits both Parties and any successors or assigns. This document, including the Agreement, is the entire agreement between the Parties 


All other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain unchanged. 

[SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower and Lenders have executed this First Amendment as of the date
first set forth above. 
  

			
	BORROWER
	
	 MODERN ROUND, INC.,
 a Nevada
corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Ronald L. Miller, Jr.

	Name:	 	Ronald L. Miller, Jr.
	Title:	 	VP & CFO
	
	 7333 East Doubletree Ranch Road

Suite D-250
 Scottsdale, AZ 85258



 [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT] 







 
			
	LENDERS
	
	 BLACK POWDER MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.,
 a
Nevada limited liability company

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mitchell A. Saltz

	Name:	 	Mitchell A. Saltz
	Title:	 	Manager
	
	 7377 East Doubletree Ranch Road

Suite 200
 Scottsdale, AZ 85258

	
	 BK ENTERTAINMENT LLC,
 an Arizona
limited liability company

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Barry Monheit

	Name:	 	Barry Monheit
	Title:	 	Manager
	
	 6130 E. Mockingbird Lane
 Paradise
Valley, AZ 85253




  
 [SIGNATURE PAGE TO
FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT]
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 135 (Friday, July 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15173]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1048-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Post-GMS Housekeeping Filing 
to be effective 8/11/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/11/22.
    Accession Number: 20220711-5029.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/25/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1049-000.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Update to GT&C Section 27 to 
be effective 8/11/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/11/22.
    Accession Number: 20220711-5049.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/25/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: July 11, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-15173 Filed 7-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Exhibit
No.32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant
to 18  U.S.C.§1350,  as created by Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,  the undersigned
officer of Sovereign Exploration Associates International, Inc. (The “Company")
hereby certifies, to such officers’ knowledge, that:





(i) the
accompanying Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2007 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and




(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: November
      14, 2008
            /s/
      Robert D. Baca
              Robert
      D. Baca
              Chief
      Executive Officer
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1225/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1225/2013 of 29 November 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1225/2013                     

# of 29 November 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE of North Carolina ex rel. Utilities Commission; Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., Applicant; Public Staff - North Carolina Utilities Commission, Intervenor v. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROY COOPER, Intervenor.

No. 343P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

Margaret A. Force, Assistant Attorney General, for Cooper.

James H. Jeffries, IV, Charlotte, for Utilities Commission.

Jane Lewis-Raymond, for PNGC.

Gina Holt, for Public Staff.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 26th day of June 2006 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."
KNIGHT v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES.

No. COA05-1061.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #431374).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; remanded to determine attorney's fees.
MITCHELL v. MITCHELL.

No. COA06-147.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Wilkes (02CVD16).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed and remanded.
STATE v. HARRISON.

No. COA05-1468.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Burke (04CRS3069).

Case without published opinion. No error.
# L_2014054DE.01002302.xml

| 22.2.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 54/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 54/23

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 636/2013 der Kommission vom 1. Juli 2013 zur Zulassung von Methionin-Zinkchelat (1:2) als Zusatzstoff in Futtermitteln für alle Tierarten

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 183 vom 2. Juli 2013
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 183 vom 2. Juli 2013

Seite 3, Titel der Verordnung:

anstatt:

„... zur Zulassung von Methionin-Zinkchelat (1:2) als Zusatzstoff in Futtermitteln für alle Tierarten“

muss es heißen:

„... zur Zulassung von Zinkchelat von Methionin (1:2) als Zusatzstoff in Futtermitteln für alle Tierarten“.

Seite 3, Erwägungsgrund 5:

anstatt:

„Methionin-Zinkchelat (1:2)“

muss es heißen:

„Zinkchelat von Methionin (1:2)“.

Seite 4, Spalte 3 des Anhangs:

anstatt:

„Methionin-Zinkchelat (1:2)“

muss es heißen:

„Zinkchelat von Methionin (1:2)“.

Seite 4, Spalte 4 Zeile 4 des Anhangs:

anstatt:

„Methionin-Zinkchelat“

muss es heißen:

„Zinkchelat von Methionin“.

---
IN RE D.W.

No. COA06-1031

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from Wayne (05JT120).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Order entered May 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00620-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF T.H.M. AND C.A.M., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-53138-2012

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s May 11, 2015 second motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief. Appellant shall file a brief by June 11, 2015. We caution appellant that no further 

extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
STATE v. Tony JOHNSON.

No. 210P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 24, 2006.

C. Scott Holmes, Durham, for Tony Johnson.

L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of April 2006 by the Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of April 2006."
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 Certification
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
        Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes
        - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Professional Lease Management Income
        Fund I (the “Fund”), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
        the undersigned, the President of the Manager and of the Fund, hereby certifies
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the
        Report of the Fund filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
 
 
 
 /s/
        Paul M. Leand
 Paul
        M.
        Leand
 President
        of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 August
        11, 2006
#### In the Matter of Malika Lenasia R., an Infant. Lakeside Family and Children's Services, Inc., Respondent; Latrece Verna R., Appellant. In the Matter of Shatima Letrece R., an Infant. Lakeside Family and Children's Services, Inc., Respondent; Latrece Verna R., Appellant.

[798 NYS2d 916]

In two related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the mother appeals from two orders of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Salinitro, J.), both dated August 26, 2004 (one as to each child), which, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, terminated her parental rights and *379transferred the guardianship and custody of the subject children to the petitioner and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner met its burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, that, despite its diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship *(see Matter of Star Leslie W.,*63 NY2d 136, 142-144 [1984]; *Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368, 381-384 [1984]; *Matter of Alicia Shante H.,*245 AD2d 509 [1997]), the mother permanently neglected her children by failing substantially and continually to maintain contact with them *(see Matter of Robert Lee W.,*198 AD2d 808 [1993]; *Matter of Roderick W.,*96 AD2d 746 [1983]; Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [b]) or plan for their future *(see Matter of Orlando F.,*40 NY2d 103 [1976]; *Matter of Ray A.M.,*37 NY2d 619 [1975]), although she was physically and financially able to do so *(see*Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]).

Under the circumstances, it was in the children’s best interests to terminate the mother’s parental rights and free them for adoption by their foster mother *(see Matter of Diana L.,*299 AD2d 359 [2002]; *Matter of Lonnie C.,*293 AD2d 535 [2002]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Adams, J.P., Krausman, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS 
OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,219
<SECURITIES>                                        45
<RECEIVABLES>                                   54,673
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,462
<INVENTORY>                                     14,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                78,711
<PP&E>                                          26,241
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,919
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 118,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,954
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   118,517
<SALES>                                         41,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,240
<CGS>                                           27,834
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,834
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,303
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,531
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,531
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         101,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               44,662,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 17,926,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,683,000
<PP&E>                                     239,959,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              24,315,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             521,109,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       71,265,000
<BONDS>                                    225,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,162,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,914,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               521,109,000
<SALES>                                    490,246,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           490,246,000
<CGS>                                      433,685,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              433,685,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,414,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          35,157,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,615,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,342,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,273,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,456,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,729,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.06)
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Donte' SANTIAGO.

No. 564P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Donte Santiago, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*21*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th day of October 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Onslow County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."
Joseph E. TEAGUE, Jr., P.E., C.M. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

No. 281P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

John C. Hunter, for Joseph Teague, Jr.

Tina Krasner, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

Joseph Teague, Jr., Pro Se.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of May 2006 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."