alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 14/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 14/2013 of 11 January 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 14/2013                     

# of 11 January 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 January 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Exhibit 10.17

2005 BONUS CRITERIA FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

On January 25, 2005, the Compensation Committee approved the 2005 bonus criteria for the Corporation's executive officers. The VCP provides for cash awards
to be paid based upon attainment of pre-established performance standards. The Committee believes the VCP facilitates the communication of VCP Objectives, and is intended to motivate
executive officers to attain those VCP Objectives. In those years in which the VCP Objectives are not realized, participants will receive less or no incentive pay.

With
regard to the Chief Executive Officer, the Compensation Committee has authorized, under the VCP, a bonus pool that is not to exceed 0.47 percent of the Corporation's 2005
adjusted operating income. With regard to those individuals that the Corporation anticipates will constitute the named executive officers for the 2005 fiscal year (the four most highly compensated
executive officers of the Corporation other than the CEO), the Committee has authorized, under the VCP, a bonus pool that is not to exceed 0.69 percent of the Corporation's planned 2005
adjusted operating income. These pools establish the maximum awards payable to these named executive officers and the Chief Executive Officer as a group based on the Committee's assessment of
performance, in terms of both objective performance (the Corporation's adjusted operating income and the performance of each executive's corporate staff group or business unit) and a subjective
analysis (for the purposes of negative discretion) of each executive's qualitative performance relative to pre-established VCP Objectives. Note that the Committee may (and traditionally
has chosen to) exercise negative (but not upward) discretion to reduce the amounts payable from the pool. Therefore, the 2005 VCP Targets for each of these executive officers are: Michael S. Gilliland
(Chairman, President and CEO) $750,000, Jeffery M. Jackson (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) $296,800, Eric J. Speck (Executive Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer)
$275,800, Michelle A. Peluso (Executive Vice President and President and Chief Executive Officer, Travelocity) $262,500, and Thomas Klein (Executive Vice President and Group President, Sabre Travel
Network and Sabre Airline Solutions) $262,500.

With
respect to all executive officers of the Corporation, the maximum cash payment under the 1996 LTIP with respect to any calendar year may not exceed an amount twice the executive's
annual base salary as in effect on the last day of the preceding fiscal year.

---



QuickLinks
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Bernard Liautaud, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Business Objects S.A. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Business Objects S.A. By:
    
    /s/ Bernard LiautaudBernard LiautaudChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains financial information extracted from the 10-K
         and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
         statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              NOV-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                         104,269
<SECURITIES>                                   510,920
<RECEIVABLES>                                  152,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         1,031,494
<DEPRECIATION>                                 49,264
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,283,001
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        1,403,401
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,520
<OTHER-SE>                                     706,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,283,001
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               348,000
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               133,191
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             83,909
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                130,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                   35,340
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   95,560
<EPS-BASIC>                                    2.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.63



</TABLE>
STONECREEK SEWER ASSOCIATION, Mitchell K. Woody and wife, Sherri Woody, George W. Gould and wife, Sharon Gould, Danny Dewitt Burnett and wife, Linda Darlene Burnett, David Richard Kindley and wife, Julie Fore Kindley, Teresa E. Whitmire, Christopher T. Mall, Perry R. Scott and wife, Gail E. Scott v. GARY D. MORGAN DEVELOPER, INC., Gary D. Morgan, Virginia W. Morgan, Harvey H. Moore and wife, Doris W. Moore.

No. 589P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Sharon B. Alexander, Hendersonville, for Moore.

William Clarke, Asheville, for Sewer Asso., et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of November 2006 by Defendants (Moore) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."
STATE v. CHASTAINE.

No. COA06-799.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Gaston (01CRS67023, 01CRS67029, 01CRS67030, 01CRS67031, 01CRS67032, 01CRS67033, 01CRS67034, 01CRS67035, 02CRS4721, 02CRS4722, 02CRS4737, 02CRS4738).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 41/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 41/2013 of 17 January 2013 amending Regulation (EEC) No 441/91 concerning the classification            of certain goods in the codes 17041019, 17041099 and 95021010 of the Combined Nomenclature and repealing Regulation (EEC)            No 1287/83         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 41/2013                     

# of 17 January 2013

# amending Regulation (EEC) No 441/91 concerning the classification of certain goods in the codes 1704 10 19, 1704 10 99 and                        9502 10 10 of the Combined Nomenclature and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1287/83                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the                           Common Customs Tariff(1), and in particular Article 9(1)(a) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)In order to ensure uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature annexed to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87, it is necessary                              to adopt measures concerning the classification of the goods referred to in the Annex to this Regulation.

(2)In accordance with Commission Regulation (EEC) No 441/91 of 25 February 1991 concerning the classification of certain goods                              in codes 1704 10 19, 1704 10 99 and 9502 10 10 of the Combined Nomenclature and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 1287/83(2) plastic dolls with transparent plastic chests filled with small sweets have been classified under CN codes 1704 10 19 and                              1704 10 99 as regards the sweets and under CN code 9502 10 10 as regards the dolls. As a consequence of the introduction of                              Note 4 to Chapter 95 of the Combined Nomenclature with effect from 1 January 2007, those items should be classified together                              as combinations having the essential character of a toy under CN code 9503 00 21.

(3)Regulation (EEC) No 441/91 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(4)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Customs Code Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The table set out in the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 441/91 is replaced by the table set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 January 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Algirdas Šemeta                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 256, 7.9.1987, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 52, 27.2.1991, p. 9.
**EXHIBIT 32**

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of YoungBroadcasting Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), theundersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuantto ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

August 9,2006

 
|        |   | /s/ Vincent J. Young    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   | Vincent J. Young        |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |                    |
|   |   |                    |
|   |   | /s/ James A. Morgan     |
|   |   | James A. Morgan         |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
Exhibit 31 (b)
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 August 6, 2010/s/ John A. Marazza

Chief Financial Officer
 50
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, I,
Thomas E. Legro, Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of JMC
Selkirk, Inc., as Managing General Partner of Selkirk Cogen Partners, L.P.,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

(1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003, fully
complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Selkirk Cogen
Partners, L.P.


November 13, 2003
    
    /s/ THOMAS E. LEGROThomas E. Legro
Vice President, Controller and
  Chief Accounting Officer
JMC Selkirk, Inc.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to JMC Selkirk, Inc. and will be retained by JMC Selkirk, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00487-CV

Elderidge Vanderhorst Hills, Appellant

v.

Bell County Law Enforcement, et al., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 169TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 251,569-B, HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Elderidge Vanderhorst Hills had filed a pro se notice of appeal from

the district court’s order dismissing his case after finding that his Petition did not comply with

Chapter 14 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.

§ 14.003 (West 2002). Appellant’s brief was due in this Court on October 26, 2011, and is overdue.

If an appellant fails to file a brief, this Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless

the appellant reasonably explains the failure and appellee is not significantly injured by that failure.

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). On November 15, 2011, we sent notice to appellant that his brief

was overdue and that the appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution if appellant did not

submit a proper motion to this Court on or before November 28, 2011. To date, no brief or motion

for extension of time has been filed. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: January 20, 2012

2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the periods ended December 31, 2004
(the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L.
PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)   
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

/s/  Richard L. Peteka
____________________Name: Richard L. PetekaDate: February 7, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

[LETTERHEAD OF OFFICEMAX]

                                 August 26, 2003

Securities and Exchange Commission
Judiciary Plaza
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

    Re:  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Ladies and Gentlemen:

    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of OfficeMax, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
July 26, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company
certifies, that, to such officer's knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

      /s/  Michael Feuer
--------------------------------
Name: Michael Feuer
Title: Chief Executive Officer

      /s/  Michael F. Killeen
--------------------------------
Name: Michael F. Killeen
Title: Senior Executive Vice President,
       Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. ROBINSON

No. COA06-722.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from Cumberland (04CRS68078).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
# L_2013193EN.01002101.xml

| 16.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 193/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 193/21

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 9 July 2013

appointing a German member of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/381/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions will become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Helmut Max JAHN on 22 July 2013, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions will become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Helmut Max JAHN on 22 July 2013,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as member of the Committee of the Regions with effect from 23 July 2013 for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Mr Jörg DUPPRÉ, Landrat des Landkreises Südwestpfalz, Präsident des Deutschen Landkreistages. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Jörg DUPPRÉ, Landrat des Landkreises Südwestpfalz, Präsident des Deutschen Landkreistages.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2013.

For the Council

The President

R. ŠADŽIUS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Lamont CHAPLIN.

No. 30P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Constance Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Christopher Lamont Chaplin.

Daniel O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of January 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."