alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CONSENT
OF PETER FOLK


Professional
Engineer




I consent
to the reference of myself under the caption "Experts" and to the use of my
Technical Report entitled “Report on the Jinniushan Gold Project Yuanling
County, Hunan Province People’s Republic of China”, dated December 28, 2006 (the
“Report”) for Minco Mining & Metals Corporation prepared in compliance with
National Instrument 43-101 and Form 43-101F1 in the Annual Registration
Statement (Form 20-F) of Minco Gold Corporation (the “Company”).





I have
read the Annual Registration Statement (Form 20-F), the National Instrument
43-101 (the "Instrument"), the Companion Policy 43-101CP, and Form 43-101F1 (the
"Form 43-101F1"), and confirm that:





(a)
            we
      have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the
      information contained in the Annual Registration Statement (Form 20-F)
      derived from “The Report” or that is within our knowledge as a result of
      the investigations and enquiries made by us in connection with the
      preparation of the Report;





(b)
            the
      Report complies with the requirements of the Instrument and Form
      43-101F1.





Further,
we hereby confirm our consent to the Company's use of the Annual Registration
Statement (Form 20-F) for its regulatory filing purposes and its disclosure to
the public.






Peter Folk,
      P.Eng




Mayne
Island, British Columbia, Canada


April 20,
2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Act 5 FDS
for 2nd quarter 10Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,917
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                      3,064
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,883
<PP&E>                                          30,105
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,144
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,951
<BONDS>                                         70,848
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,643
<SALES>                                         21,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,861
<CGS>                                            2,986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,357)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,357)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,357)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.74)
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of --

Mirador Enterprises, Inc. 

Under Contract No. W9128F-14-C-0020 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 60870, 60898 

Terance P. Perry, Esq. 

Datsopoulos, MacDonald & Lind, P .C. 

Missoula, MT 

Michael P. Goodman, Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Melissa M. Head, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Omaha 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Pursuant to appellant's June 21, 2018 motion to dismiss the above-captioned 

appeals with prejudice, which indicates that the motion was filed pursuant to a settlement 

agreement between the parties and that counsel for the government concurs in the 

request, the above-captioned appeals are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

Dated: June 26, 2018 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 60870, 60898, Appeals ofMirador 

Enterprises, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
OFFI& OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

January 86, 19SQ 

Hon. Qeorge H. Sheppard 

Comptroller 

Austin, Texsa 

Dear Mr. Sheppard: 

(' \ 

.0p1h10n Ho. 

&j 

0-S '\ 

Be: Validity of the '. \ 

county eolal Tax 

a 

A 

cant t 

'\ \3 

39, to Eonoaabls 

aot betwesn Yilam 

reoeired by this 

our opinion on 

and should be aponey Goneral. 

traot whereby a 

peraon Is to aad all delinquent 

s a speelal aontraot under 

ent the Stats of Texas In 

ular suits in whioh the 

II dlsquallfled to aat 

rspresentsd the defendanta 

at this dontraat oan only 

e same law and ssme statutes that 

tax aontraata In general, and one 

s Artiole 7335 of the Revised Civil 

whloh in part says: 

ver the ocxamlssioners oourt of any 

a0 u&y&ter thirty days written notibr to the 

oouutp attorney or diatriot attorney to file d e- 

'llnquent tax suite and his Mltue to do so, shall 

3 eeln may 

oontraot with sng oompsteat attorney to snfaros 

or assl8t in ths eniordement of the oolleotlon 

of any dsllnqusnt State and oounty tams..." 
. 

'Hon. George H. Sheppard, Janwiry 26, 1939, Page 2 

This statute clearly limits com!!issioners' courts entering 

into these contracts until "after thirty days written notice 

to the county attorney or district attorney to ffle delinquent 

tax suits and his failure to do SO." 

The contract in question does not show or recite 

that such notice has been eiven or that the notice has been 

waived, or no outside proof to that effect has be-n riven 

us. The contract recites that It has been entered into because the district attorney is ineligible to represent the 

state on these cases; but we don't believe that that recitation obviates the neoesslty of the thirty day notice or a 

waiver from the district attorney waivinp the notice. If 

the district attorney is ineligible to represent the state in 

these cases, then a thirty-day notice could be riven him and 

he could fail to act, or he could waive the notice and if he 

desired to dc so he could give hits reasons by stating that he 

was ineliclble to act. 

For the reasons outline& above xe -ive as our opinion that this contract does not appear to be valid, and the 

Comptroller and the Attorney "enera shouaR not approve it. 

Yours very truly 

.!iTTOR.WY SV?:":"hL OP TEXAS 

By (si.cned) Cecil 2. Rotsch 

Assistant 

CCR:BT 

ApPROv".3 : 

(signed) Gerald C. Mann 

ATTOR?DY GENERAL 0" TEXAS
**Exhibit 6.2 **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report on Form 40-F of Virginia Mines Inc. for  the year ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

  Date: May 29, 2006

*/s/ Gaetan Mercier*  Gaétan Mercier  Chief Financial Officer

  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other  document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature  that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained  by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or  its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3032 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3032

  To increase the standard mileage rate for use of an automobile for 
     business, medical, and moving deduction purposes for 2008 and 
permanently increase such rate for charitable deduction purposes under 
   the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and to temporarily increase the 
   reimbursement rate for use of an automobile by Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2008

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To increase the standard mileage rate for use of an automobile for 
     business, medical, and moving deduction purposes for 2008 and 
permanently increase such rate for charitable deduction purposes under 
   the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and to temporarily increase the 
   reimbursement rate for use of an automobile by Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reimbursing Our American Drivers 
(ROAD) Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN MILEAGE RATE DEDUCTION.

    (a) Rate for Business, Medical, and Moving Use of an Automobile.--
For purposes of sections 162(a), 213(d)(1)(B), and 217 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986, the standard mileage rate for use of an 
automobile shall be 70 cents per mile for any use after December 31, 
2007, and before January 1, 2009.
    (b) Rate for Charitable Use of an Automobile.--Section 170(i) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``14 cents'' 
and inserting ``40 cents''.

SEC. 3. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN REIMBURSEMENT RATE FOR USE OF AN 
              AUTOMOBILE FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.

    For purposes of section 5704 of title 5, United States Code, the 
standard mileage rate for use of an automobile for an employee who is 
engaged on official business for the Government shall be 70 cents per 
mile for any use after December 31, 2007, and before January 1, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. SMITH.

No. COA05-950.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. No error.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6989

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SIGMUND DIAOLA JAMES, a/k/a Sig,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cr-00944-CMC-1)

Submitted: May 21, 2024 Decided: May 23, 2024

Before WYNN and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sigmund Diaola James, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6989 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/23/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Sigmund Diaola James appeals the district court’s order construing his pro se 

motions under the First Step Act and Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 as unauthorized, successive 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 motions and dismissing them for lack of jurisdiction.

*

 Our review of the 

record confirms that the district court properly construed James’ motions as successive 

§ 2255 motions over which it lacked jurisdiction because he failed to obtain prefiling 

authorization from this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A); United States v. Ferguson, 

55 F.4th 262, 270-72 (4th Cir. 2022); McRae, 793 F.3d at 397-400. Accordingly, we affirm 

the district court’s order.

Consistent with our decision in United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th 

Cir. 2003), we construe James’ notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file 

a second or successive § 2255 motion. Upon review, we conclude that James’ claims do 

not meet the relevant standard. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). We therefore deny authorization 

to file a successive § 2255 motion. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* A certificate of appealability is not required to appeal the district court’s 

jurisdictional categorization of a motion as an unauthorized, successive habeas petition. 

United States v. McRae, 793 F.3d 392, 400 (4th Cir. 2015).

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6989 Doc: 6 Filed: 05/23/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                   FORM 10-K/A

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D. C. 20549

                       AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION OR REPORT

                Filed pursuant to Section 12, 13, or 15(d) of
                      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                          SHOPPERS FOOD WAREHOUSE CORP.
                          -----------------------------
               (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)


Commission file number: 333-32825


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

         The undersigned registrant hereby amends the following items, financial
statements, exhibits or other portions of its Annual Report Under Section 12 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Fiscal Year Ended January
27, 2001 on Form 10-K as set forth below:

 (List all such items, financial statements, exhibits or other portions amended)

         Signature Page:

         The signature page to the report is hereby amended and restated by
adding the name and signature of William J. White, Chief Executive Officer of
the registrant, deleting the name and signature of Jeffrey Noddle, a Director,
and adding in lieu thereof the name and signature of Michael L. Jackson, also a
Director.

         Exhibit filed herewith:

         Exhibit 99.1.  Amended and Restated Signature Page.

         Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this amendment to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



                                                   SHOPPERS FOOD WAREHOUSE CORP.
                                                            (Registrant)


Date:    April 25, 2001                            By:  /s/ Warren E. Simpson
                                                        ---------------------
                                                        Warren E. Simpson
                                                        Assistant Secretary
SEA RANCH OWNERS ASSO. v. SEA RANCH.

No. 338P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 13, 2006.

Alyssa M. Chen, William S. Hoyle, for Sea Ranch Owners Asso.

Steven C. Frucci, Virginia Beach, VA, Bradford J. Lingg, E. Crouse Gray, Kill Devil Hills, for Sea Ranch II, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of December 2006 by Plaintiff to Amend Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 13th day of December 2006."
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 50156 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MARTIN BARCENAS

- PATINO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:16

- CR

- 567

- 1

Before JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Martin Barcenas

- Patino appeals his sentence of 48 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release for illegal reentry after deportation. He argues that the district court erroneously determined that his sentence was subject to an enhancement under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b ). He asserts that his indictment did not allege that he had a prior conviction and that ,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 21, 2017 Lyl e W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-50156 Document: 00514283331 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/21/2017No. 17

- 50156

2 therefore, the enhancement violated his due process rights because his sentence exceeded the statutory maximum. The Government has filed an unopposed motion for su mmary affirmance, asserting that Almendarez

- Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), forecloses Barcenas

- Patino ’s argument. Barcenas

- Patino concedes that his argument was rejected in Almendarez

- Torres and explains that he raises it to preserve it for further review; thus, summary affirmance is appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis , 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED. The judgment is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alt ernative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED. Case: 17-50156 Document: 00514283331 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/21/2017
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 136 (Monday, July 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42719-42720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15261]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1050-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement 
Update (SoCal July 2022) to be effective 7/12/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/11/22.
    Accession Number: 20220711-5149.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/25/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1051-000.
    Applicants: Southeast Supply Header, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate--Duke Energy 
Florida 840163 to be effective 9/6/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/12/22.
    Accession Number: 20220712-5025.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/25/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by

[[Page 42720]]

clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: July 12, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-15261 Filed 7-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# L_2013193EN.01001801.xml

| 16.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 193/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 193/18

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUPOL COPPS/1/2013

of 9 July 2013

extending the mandate of the Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS)

(2013/378/EU)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/354/CFSP of 3 July 2013 on the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) (1), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Decision 2013/354/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Decision 2013/354/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with the third paragraph of Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | Decision 2013/354/CFSP extended the duration of EUPOL COPPS until 30 June 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision 2013/354/CFSP extended the duration of EUPOL COPPS until 30 June 2014.

| (3) | On 3 July 2012, the Political and Security Committee adopted decision EUPOL COPPS/1/2012 (2), appointing Mr Kenneth DEANE as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS from 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 3 July 2012, the Political and Security Committee adopted decision EUPOL COPPS/1/2012 (2), appointing Mr Kenneth DEANE as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS from 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013.

| (4) | On 14 June 2013, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the extension of the mandate of Mr Kenneth DEANE as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

On 14 June 2013, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the extension of the mandate of Mr Kenneth DEANE as Head of Mission of EUPOL COPPS from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The mandate of Mr Kenneth DEANE as Head of Mission of the European Union Police Mission for the Palestinian Territories (EUPOL COPPS) is hereby extended until 30 June 2014.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply from 1 July 2013.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2013.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 185, 4.7.2013, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 186, 14.7.2012, p. 31.

2

---
STATE v. WALLACE

No. COA06-1081

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Haywood (05CRS52616, 05CRS52617, 05CRS52618).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
ARMSTRONG & ARMSTRONG, P.A. v. Coley RHODES.

No. 186P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

R. Hayes Hofler, Durham, for Coley Rhodes.

Dan J. McLamb, Barbara Weyher, Raleigh, L. Lamar Armstrong, Jr., Smithfield, for Armstrong & Armstrong.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of April 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."