alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VI 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 314 

For the relief of Josephina Valera Lopez. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2007 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Josephina Valera Lopez. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, for the purposes of the Immigration and Na6 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Josephina Valera 

7 Lopez shall be deemed to have been lawfully admitted to, 

8 and remained in, the United States, and shall be eligible 

9 for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admit10 ted for permanent residence under section 245 of the Im11 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) upon filing 

12 an application for such adjustment of status. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•S 314 IS

1 (b) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub2 section (a) shall apply only if the application for adjust3 ment of status is filed with appropriate fees not later than 

4 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

5 (c) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

6 Upon the granting of permanent resident status to 

7 Josephina Valera Lopez, the Secretary of State shall in8 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

9 or subsequent fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 

10 visas that are made available to natives of the country of 

11 Josephina Valera Lopez’s birth under section 202(e) or 

12 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

13 1152(e), 1153(a)), as applicable. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
# L_2016039EN.01000101.xml

| 16.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 39/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/197

of 3 February 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Cochinilla de Canarias (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Cochinilla de Canarias’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Cochinilla de Canarias’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cochinilla de Canarias’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Cochinilla de Canarias’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Cochinilla de Canarias’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.12. cochineal set out in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 324, 2.10.2015, p. 33.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
EXHIBIT 15.1





ClubCorp, Inc.
Dallas, Texas

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Re:  Registration Statement Nos. 33-89818, 33-96568, 333-08041 and 333-57107

With  respect  to  the  subject  registration  statements,  we  acknowledge  our
awareness  of  the  use therein of our report dated October 15, 1999, related to
our  review  of  interim  financial  information.

Pursuant  to  Rule  436(c)  under the Securities Act of 1933, such report is not
considered  part  of  a  registration  statement  prepared  or  certified  by an
accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning
of  sections  7  and  11  of  the  Act.




                                   KPMG  LLP



Dallas, Texas
October 21, 1999
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    /s/ James C. MastandreaJames C. MastandreaChairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President

  (Principal Executive Officer)
----

**EXHIBIT      32.4**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                              |
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000530 27-OCT-2017 10:59 AM
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2683

_____________________________

RONALD WILLIAMS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel—

Original Jurisdiction.

October 5, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate 

counsel is denied on the merits.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and KELSEY and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Ronald Williams, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5566 

To amend the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 to provide for a temporary 

increase in the maximum loan guaranty amount for housing loans guaranteed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2008 

Mrs. CAPITO (for herself, Mrs. BIGGERT, and Mr. BACHUS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 to provide 

for a temporary increase in the maximum loan guaranty 

amount for housing loans guaranteed by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5566 IH

1 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN MAXIMUM LOAN 

2 GUARANTY AMOUNT FOR HOUSING LOANS 

3 GUARANTEED BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

4 AFFAIRS. 

5 Section 201(a) of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 

6 (Public Law 110–185; 122 Stat. 613) is amended by add7 ing at the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(3) VA GUARANTEED HOUSING LOANS.—Not9 withstanding subparagraph (C) of section 

10 3703(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, for pur11 poses of any loan described in that section for which 

12 the mortgagee issues a loan commitment during the 

13 period beginning on February 13, 2008, and ending 

14 at the end of December 31, 2008, the term ‘max15 imum guaranty amount’ means the dollar amount 

16 that is equal to 25 percent of the amount deter17 mined under paragraph (2) of this subsection for a 

18 residence of the applicable size located in the area 

19 in which the residence for which the loan is made is 

20 located.’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION FOUND ON
PAGES 1 AND 2 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,093
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                       597
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,653
<PP&E>                                           4,715
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,834
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,542
<BONDS>                                          7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,964
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,022
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,194
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,139
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  87
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,473
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,623
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,623
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.93
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Knight Transportation, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, David A. Jackson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





May
      11, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      David A. JacksonDavid
      A. JacksonChief
      Financial Officer








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knight Transportation, Inc. and will be retained by Knight
Transportation, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 393/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 393/2013 of 29 April 2013 amending Regulations (EC) No 1120/2009 and (EC) No 1122/2009            as regards the eligibility criteria and the notification obligations concerning hemp varieties for the implementation of the            direct support schemes for farmers (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 393/2013                     

# of 29 April 2013

# amending Regulations (EC) No 1120/2009 and (EC) No 1122/2009 as regards the eligibility criteria and the notification obligations                        concerning hemp varieties for the implementation of the direct support schemes for farmers (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 639/2014 of 11 March 2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European                                 Parliament and of the Council establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework                                 of the common agricultural policy and amending Annex X to that Regulation.
# Council Implementing Decision 2013/469/CFSPShow full title

Council Implementing Decision 2013/469/CFSP of 23 September 2013 implementing Decision 2011/101/CFSP concerning restrictive            measures against Zimbabwe         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Implementing Decision 2013/469/CFSP                     

# of 23 September 2013

# implementing Decision 2011/101/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2011/101/CFSP(1), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)On 15 February 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/101/CFSP.

(2)One entity should be removed from the list of persons and entities in Annex I to Decision 2011/101/CFSP.

(3)Decision 2011/101/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following entity is deleted from the list of persons and entities in Annex I to Decision 2011/101/CFSP:
          -  Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation. 

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 23 September 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

L. Linkevičius                            

1

OJ L 42, 16.2.2011, p. 6.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Microtek Medical Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, R.
G. Wilson,  Chief Financial  Officer,  Treasurer and Assistant  Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ R.G. Wilson
----------------------------
R. G. Wilson
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary
August 13, 2002




1498851
STATE of North Carolina v. Larry McLeod PULLEY.

No. 42P04-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2006.

Larry McLeod Pulley, Pro Se.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 14th day of June 2006 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Lee County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 14th day of December 2006."
exv10w1



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 4

TO

BURLINGTON RESOURCES INC.

1997 EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN



The Burlington Resources Inc. 1997 Employee Stock Incentive Plan is hereby amended, effective as of
July 28, 2005, as follows:





	 	1.	 	Section 2.1 is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

“2.1 Beneficiary
	 
	 	 	 	“The person or persons designated by the Participant as his or her
beneficiary under the Plan on a form prescribed by and delivered to the Plan
Administrator to whom the Participant’s rights under the Plan shall pass
upon the Participant’s death or, if no such effective beneficiary
designation is in effect, the person or persons to whom the Participant’s
rights under the Plan shall have passed by will or the laws of descent and
distribution.”
	 
	 	2.	 	The first sentence of Section 6.2(f) is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

“Except as provided below, during a Participant’s lifetime, an Option may be
exercisable only by the Participant and Options granted under the Plan and
the rights and privileges conferred thereby shall not be subject to
execution, attachment or similar process and may not be transferred,
assigned, pledged or hypothecated in any manner (whether by operation of law
or otherwise) other than by Beneficiary designation, by will or by the
applicable laws of descent and distribution.”
# The Employer's Liability (Compulsory Insurance) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2013 No. 199

Employer's Liability

# The Employer's Liability (Compulsory Insurance) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

19th July 2013

Coming into operation

22nd August 2013

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (1.4.2015) by The Employers Liability (Compulsory Insurance) (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2015 (S.R. 2015/80), **regs. 1**, **3**
## NUMBERS 13

- 1 9

- 00 545

- CV & 13

- 19

- 00547

- CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN R E FRAUDULENT HOSPITAL LIEN LITIGATION

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

On October 23, 2019, t his Court granted Relator’s emergency motion s for stay in

appellate cause numbers 13

- 19

- 00545

- CV and 13

- 19

- 00547

- CV , and we ordered the trial

court to stay all pending proceedings

. On October 28, 2019, R eal P arties in I nterest filed

motion s in both appellate causes requesting that we reconsider our October 23, 2019

order and lift the stay

, and they filed motions in both causes requesting that in the

alternative we clarify our October 23rd order.2 This Court, having examined and fully considered the motion s , is of the opinion

that the motion s to reconsider our October 23, 2019 order and lift the stay should be

denied and that the motions for clarification should be granted . Accordingly, we DENY

the Real Parties in Interests’ motion s request ing that we lift the stay in the trial court

, and

we GRANT the Real Parties in Interests’ motion s request ing that we clarify our order to

stay the proceedings in the trial court

. We clarify that all proceedings in these causes are

hereby STAYED and remain on hold including legal deadlines applicable to any party

pending further order of the Court or resolution of these original pro ceedings. See T EX

.

R. A PP

. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is

effective until the case is finally decided.”) ; In re Geomet Recycling LLC , 578 S.W.3d 82,

91 (Tex. 2019) (orig. proceeding) (explaining that § 51.014(b) “ contains no exceptions to

its mandatory stay of ‘ all other proceedings in the trial court pending resolution of that

appeal ’ ” )

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

2 9th day of October, 201 9

.
# L_2013160DE.01001602.xml

| 12.6.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 160/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.6.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 160/16

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 513/2013 der Kommission vom 4. Juni 2013 zur Einführung eines vorläufigen Antidumpingzolls auf die Einfuhren von Fotovoltaik-Modulen aus kristallinem Silicium und Schlüsselkomponenten davon (Zellen und Wafer) mit Ursprung in oder versandt aus der Volksrepublik China und zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 182/2013 zur zollamtlichen Erfassung dieser Einfuhren mit Ursprung in oder versandt aus der Volksrepublik China

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 152 vom 5. Juni 2013
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 152 vom 5. Juni 2013

Auf Seite 40, Artikel 1 Absatz 1 erster Unterabsatz:

anstatt:

„ausgenommen davon sind Einfuhren im Durchfuhrverkehr im Sinne des Artikels V GATT.“

muss es heißen:

„ausgenommen davon sind Waren im Durchfuhrverkehr im Sinne des Artikels V GATT.“

---
STATE v. SCOTT

No. COA05-1093

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Haywood (04CRS53521).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.