alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 19

                          Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.:

We have examined  management's  assertion about The CIT  Group/Sales  Financing,
Inc. (the Company),  a wholly owned subsidiary of The CIT Group Holdings,  Inc.,
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers  (USAP) as of and for the year ended  December 31, 1996  included in the
accompanying  management assertion.  Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on  management's  assertion  about the  Company's  compliance
based on our examination

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

Management's  assertion  herein  relates  to the  application  of these  minimum
servicing  standards as they apply to loans  serviced for others by the Company,
except for the GNMA Defaulted Manufactured Housing Master Subservicing contract.
Management has issued a separate  assertion on the  application of these minimum
servicing  standards as they relate to the GNMA Defaulted  Manufactured  Housing
Master  Subservicing  contract.  Such assertion stated that the Company complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards, except for certain items of
non-compliance  relating soley to the GNMA Defaulted Manufactured Housing Master
Subservicing contract during a portion of the year ended December 31, 1996 which
primarily  related to a subservicer  and that the Company was in compliance with
all  minimum  servicing  standards  as of  December  31,  1996.  Our  opinion on
management's  assertion,  dated  March  12,  1997  related  to the USAP  minimum
servicing standards as applied to the GNMA Defaulted Manufactured Housing Master
Subservicing contract as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 states that
their assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects.


                                    /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                    KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
March 12, 1997
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22 - 0144 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROBERT L. WITHEROW

Defendant and Appellant. **GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellant’s moti on for a 16 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellant is granted an extension of tim e to and including July 22, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file his reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 29 2022

06/29/2022
Case Number: DA 22-0144
# L_2013123EN.01002802.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 123/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 123/28

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 363/2013 of 22 April 2013 implementing Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 111 of 23 April 2013
  )

On page 5, Annex, entry 36, column ‘Name’:

for:

‘Nizar (
  Image 1
  ) Al-Assad (
  Image 2
  ) (a.k.a. Al-Assaad, Al-Assad, Al-Asaad)’,

read:

‘Nizar Al-Assad (
  Image 3
  )’;

on page 5, Annex, entry 36, column ‘Identifying information’:

for:

‘Previously head of the “Nizar Oilfield Supplies” company’,

read:

‘Cousin of Bashar Al-Assad; previously head of the “Nizar Oilfield Supplies” company’.

---
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 822/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 822/2013 of 27 August 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for sprat in Union waters of            Subdivisions 22-32 by vessels flying the flag of Poland         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 822/2013                     

# of 27 August 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for sprat in Union waters of Subdivisions 22-32 by vessels flying the flag of Poland

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 1088/2012 of 20 November 2012 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks                              and groups of fish stocks applicable in the Baltic Sea(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 August 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 323, 22.11.2012, p. 2.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,962,570
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,331,116
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,511,343
<PP&E>                                       4,309,615
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,748,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,471,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,261,244
<BONDS>                                        121,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,506
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,071,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,471,394
<SALES>                                     27,790,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,790,621
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,239,268
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,276,326
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               402,804
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             255,219
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                197,540
<INCOME-TAX>                                (1,200,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,397,540
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,397,540
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. McEWEN.

No. COA05-1683.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (03CRS105293, 03CRS105294)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 18

- 00276

- CV

CECIL G. KNICKERBOCK ER

, Appellant

v.

DONALD KNICKERBOCKER AS INDEPENDENT

EXECUTOR OF THE ESTA TE OF DAVID

KNICKERBOCKER AND ROY MATHIS

, Appellee s

From the 12th District Court

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 8976 PR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Cecil G. Knickerbocker appealed an adverse judgment rendered against him on

June 21, 2018. Knickerbocker has now filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion

is granted, and this proceeding is dismissed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a)(1).

TOM GR AY

Chief JusticeKnickerbocker v. Knickerbocker Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 10 , 2018

[CV06]
FIEDLER v. BLUE SKY SERVICES, INC.

No. COA05-1315.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Wake (04CVD6214)

Case without published opinion. Dismissed.
IN RE K.Q.N.

COA06-664.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 15, 2007.

Certification Date June 4, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05J199, 05J200).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated.
Order entered October 17, 2017 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01143-CV 

IN RE ARTURO SOLIS, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 52nd District Court 

Coryell County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. C10-11-40751 

ORDER 

Before Justices Francis, Brown, and Whitehill 

Before the Court is relator’s October 16, 2017 “Motion for Appellate Time Table 

Calculations be Made Under Prisoners Mail-Box Rule Timely Filed Permissible Post-Judgment 

Motions on Record.”1 Based on the Court’s October 9, 2017 opinion denying relator’s petition 

for writ of mandamus, we DENY the motion as moot. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

 JUSTICE 

 

1

 Although originally filed in the Tenth Court of Appeals and docketed as case number 10-17-00286-CR, this 

original proceeding was transferred to this Court pursuant to Tex. Gov’t Code § 73.001 and due to recusals on the 

Tenth Court of Appeals. See TEX. SUP. CT. ORDER, Misc. Docket No. 17–9127 (Sept. 28, 2017).
STATE v. BINGHAM.

No. COA06-872.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Wake (05CRS1490, 05CRS1491, 05CRS1492).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error in defendants trial; remanded for a new restitution award.
Exhibit 23.1

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-69340) pertaining to the 2000 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Plan and
Compensatory Plan with Oscar Otero of Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated
and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47312) pertaining to the 1999
Stock Option Plan of Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated, as amended, of
our report dated February 24, 2004, except for the matters discussed in the
second and third paragraphs of Note 16, as to which the date is March 12, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Puradyn Filter
Technologies Incorporated included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the
year ended December 31, 2003.

                                                               Ernst & Young LLP

West Palm Beach, Florida
March 25, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16790]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Premium War Risk Insurance

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Determination to allow for the provision of FAA Aviation 
Insurance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains the text of a memorandum from the 
Secretary of Transportation to the Administrator of the Federal 
Aviation Administration regarding the Provision of Aviation Insurance 
Coverage for U.S. Flag Commercial Air Carrier Service in Domestic and 
International Operations.

DATES: Dates of extension from August 31, 2005 through December 31, 
2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Helen Kish, Program Analyst, AEP-20, 
202-267-9943 or Eric Nelson, Program Analyst, AEP-20, 202-267-3090. 
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20591.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 16, 2005, the Secretary of 
Transportation authorized the provision of aviation insurance by the 
Federal Aviation Administration for 122 days as follows:

MEMORANDUM FOR THE ADMINISTRATOR

    Pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the President in 
Presidential Determination 2005-15 of December 21, 2004, I hereby 
make the determination and finding set forth in that Determination 
and extend the determination to allow for the provision of aviation 
insurance and reinsurance coverage for U.S. flag commercial air 
carrier service in domestic and international operations through 
December 31, 2005.
    Pursuant to section 44306(c) of Chapter 443 of 49 U.S.C., 
Aviation Insurance, the period for provision of insurance shall be 
extended from August 31, 2005, through December 31, 2005.
     /s/ Normal Y. Mineta

    Affected Public: Air Carriers who currently have premium war risk 
insurance with the Federal Aviation Administration.

    Issued in Washington, DC on August 17, 2005.
John M. Rodgers,
Director, Aviation Insurance Program Office.
[FR Doc. 05-16790 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
CAMPBELL v. INGRAM & McLaurin.

No. 636A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 10, 2007.

William P. Floyd, Jr., for Campbell.

Robert A. Hasty, Jr., Spring, TX, for McLaurin.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 636 S.E.2d 847.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of March 2007 by Defendant (Ingram) to Withdraw Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of April 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
STATE v. SAVAGE

No. COA04-1694.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Beaufort (03CRS51841).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-4463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission has changed the location of its meeting scheduled on August 26, 2005, to the Hamilton Crowne Plaza Hotel, Hamilton Ballroom on the lower level, 1001 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. The meeting will not be held at the Shriners Almas Temple (adjacent to the Hamilton Crowne Plaza Hotel), 1315 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. The meeting will begin at 8:30 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. and is open to the public.

The purpose of the Commission is to carry out a study of the benefits under the laws of the United States that are provided to compensate and assist veterans and their survivors for disabilities and deaths attributable to military service.

On August 26, 2005, the Commission will engage in panel discussions with current and former employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Department of Defense, and the House Committees on Armed Services and Veterans' Affairs with knowledge and expertise in programs to assist and compensate disabled retirees and veterans and their survivors. The agenda will also include briefings by the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Department of Defense to provide the Commission with an understanding of programs to intervene, diagnose, treat, and assess post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

                    Interested persons may attend and present oral statements to the Commission. Interested parties may provide written comments for review by the Commission at any time to Mr. Ray Wilburn, Executive Director, Veterans' Disability Benefits Commission, 1101 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004, or by e-mail at                     *vetscommission@va.gov.*                     Information on the Commission may be found at                     *http://www.va.gov/​vetscommission.*

Dated: August 18, 2005.

E. Philip Riggin,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-16759  Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-M
STATE of North Carolina v. Samuel Andrew FITZGERALD.

No. 407P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Samuel Fitzgerald.

Anita LeVeaux, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of August 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."
STATE v. Willie FORREST, III.

No. 270A04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 7, 2006.

Irving Joyner, Durham, for Willie Forrest, III.

Kevin L. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of September 2006 by ACLU of NC & NCATL for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 7th day of September 2006."
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7652

MAURO ABOYTES-VERA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-465-R) Submitted: January 7, 1998 Decided: January 21, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Mauro Aboytes-Vera, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Bain Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Mauro Aboytes-Vera appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Aboytes-Vera v. Angelone , No. CA-98- 465-R (W.D. Va. Oct. 22, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE v. Leon A. MURPHY.

No. 543P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of October 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review Under G.S. 7A-31:"

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of March 2007."
STATE of North Carolina v. Wayne Thomas JOHNSON.

No. 119P00-13.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

Wayne Thomas Johnson, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 9th day of August 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Alamance County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th day of September 2006 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Alamance County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 5th day of October 2006."