alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 130/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 130/2013 of 14 February 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 130/2013                     

# of 14 February 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 February 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
Exhibit
32.1





TELETOUCH
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.





OFFICER’S
CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended August 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Robert M. McMurrey, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.        The
Report is in full compliances with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/Robert M.
      McMurreyRobert
      M. McMurreyChief
      Executive OfficerOctober
      14, 2010
Exhibit 31 (a)
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
    November 10, 2008/s/ Richard H. SmithChief Executive Officer 40
STATE v. ROYSTER

No. COA06-702

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Alamance (03CRS61815).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Marcus Reymond ROBINSON.

No. 411A94-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 23, 2007.

Geoffrey W. Hosford, Wilmington, for Robinson.

*809Valerie B. Spalding, Special Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of January 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of January 2007."

Justices TIMMONS-GOODSON and BRADY recused.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-70965 on Form S-8, No. 333-58160 on Form S-8, No. 333-56734 on Form S-8, No. 333-108806 onForm S-8 and No. 333-104494 on Form S-3 of LNR Property Corporation of our report dated February 25, 2004, on the consolidated financial statements of LNR Property Corporation and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion andincludes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets) and of our report dated February 25, 2004 relating to the financialstatement schedules appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of LNR Property Corporation for the year ended November 30, 2003. 

 

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP 

 

Miami, Florida 

February 25, 2004
Brenton Eric TAYLOR v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. d/b/a N.C. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.

No. 83P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Jerome P. Trehy, Jr., Raleigh, for Taylor.

Walter E. Brock, Jr., Raleigh, for Farm Bureau.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 638 S.E.2d 636.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of February 2007 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
HOLLIN v. COUNCIL ON AGING.

No. 79P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 8, 2007.

Brent Adams, Dunn, Sheila Chavis, for Hollin.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of February 2007 by Defendants for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of February 2007."
H63-I5

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 03-14-00313-CR

Kirt Allen Esthay a/k/a Kirt Allen

Estay a/k/a Kirt Estay v. The State

STYLE: of Texas

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED

OFFENSE: 22.02

COUNTY: Concho

TRIAL COURT: 119th District Court

DATE: 3/31/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: DAS-13-01849

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Kirt Allen Esthay a/k/a Kirt Allen

Estay a/k/a Kirt Estay v. The State of

STYLE: Texas

PEP SE Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: ± //<?i/?-t7JT

JUDGE: f^\_ LttSls^^-,

CCA#: 463-/5'

CCA Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

ELECTRONIC RECORD
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1028/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1028/2013 of 23 October 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in EU and International            waters of V, international waters of XII and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Germany         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1028/2013                     

# of 23 October 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in EU and International waters of V, international waters of XII and XIV                        by vessels flying the flag of Germany                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
Exhibit 4.16      CONSENT OF ISABELLE ROY   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2011 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Isabelle Roy, staff member of the Company, participated, in the preparation of Technical Report and Recommendations, 2010 Exploration Program, FCI Property  May 2010 ( Technical Study) concerning mineralized material in the FCI property for the Company.   Portions of the Technical Study are summarized under the heading Item III Description of the Business  3.7.4 Geological Setting, 3.7.5 Exploration Work and Drilling, and 3.7.6 Mineralization in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2011 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference therein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.    Very truly yours,   /s/ Isabelle Roy Name:  Isabelle Roy, B.Sc., P.Geo     May 11, 2011
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 983/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 983/2013 of 11 October 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for tusk in EU and international            waters of I, II and XIV by vessels flying the flag of France         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 983/2013                     

# of 11 October 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for tusk in EU and international waters of I, II and XIV by vessels flying the flag                        of France                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 October 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

The following certification will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liability ofthat section, nor will the certification be deemed incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates itby reference.

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

I, Robert E.Wheaton, President and Chief Executive Officer of Star Buffet, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to my knowledge:

 

1.             The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2008 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.             The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| April 24, 2008 | /s/ Robert E. Wheaton   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
|                | Robert E. Wheaton       |
|                | President and           |
|                | Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of the above certification has been provided to StarBuffet, Inc. and will be retained by Star Buffet, Inc. and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 9, 2009

0701 

# Order

July 9, 2009

138474

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138474 COA: 280650 Oakland CC: 2006-208323-FC CAMERON MARC GREENBERG, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

C ORRIGAN 

### , J., not participating for the reasons stated in People v Parsons , order of the Supreme Court, entered March 6, 2007 (Docket No. 132975).
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 164 (Thursday, August 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49944-49945]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16874]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service


The Transportation Plan/ Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 
Grand Teton National Park, WY

AGENCY: National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

[[Page 49945]]


ACTION: This notice informs the public that the comment period for the 
Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Transportation Plan, Grand 
Teton National Park, Wyoming, is extended.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Park Service published a Notice of Availability 
on June 6, 2005 (70 FR 107) for the draft Environmental Impact 
Statement for the Transportation Plan, Grand Teton National Park, 
Wyoming. The public comment period was to expire on August 1, 2005. 
This notice extends the public comment period until August 25, 2005.

DATES: Comments on the DEIS must be received by August 25, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Information will be available for public review and comment 
at the Park Headquarters Visitor Center in Moose, Wyoming and the 
Reference Desk of the Teton County Library in Jackson, Wyoming. It will 
also be available online at both http://parkplanning.nps.gov and http://www.nps.gov/grte/plans/planning.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Gibson Scott, Superintendent, 
Grand Teton National Park, PO Drawer 170, Moose, Wyoming, 83012-0170, 
(370) 739-3410.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: If you wish to comment, you may submit your 
comments by any one of several methods. You may mail comments to 
Superintendent Office, P.O. Drawer 170, Moose, Wyoming 83012-0170, 
Attention: Transportation Plan. You may also comment via the e-mail to 
http://parkplanning.nps.gov, choose ``Grand Teton National Park'' or 
``Plan/Documents Open for Comment'' and then click ``Comment on 
Document''. Finally, you may hand-deliver comments to the Grand Teton 
Visitor Center, Moose, Wyoming. Our practice is to make comments, 
including names and home addresses of respondents, available for public 
review during business hours. Individual respondents may request that 
we withhold their home address from the record, which we will honor to 
the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which 
we would withhold from the record a respondent's identity, as allowable 
by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or address, you must 
state this prominently at the beginning of your comment. We will make 
all submissions from organizations or businesses, and from individuals 
identifying themselves as representatives or officials of organizations 
or businesses, available for public inspection in their entirety.

    Dated: July 26, 2005.
Kate Cannon,
Acting Deputy Regional Director, Intermountain Region, National Park 
Service.
[FR Doc. 05-16874 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
IN RE K.D.R.

No. COA06-1206.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Catawba (99J338).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed in part; Affirmed in part.