alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 587/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 587/2013 of 20 June 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Fraises de Nîmes (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 587/2013                     

# of 20 June 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Fraises de Nîmes                        (PGI)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection                              of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs(2).

(2)Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Fraises de Nîmes’ was                              published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Fraises de Nîmes’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 June 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.6.****Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed**U.K.

#### FRANCEU.K.

Fraises de Nîmes (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.                           

3

OJ C 296, 2.10.2012, p. 9.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 21
                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                             AS OF MARCH 20, 1997

FULL NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                 PLACE OF INCORPORATION
-----------------------                                 ----------------------

LASON SYSTEMS, INC.                                     MICHIGAN, USA

CHURCHILL COMMUNICATIONS COROPORATION                   NEW YORK, USA

DELAWARE LEGAL COPY, INC.                               DELAWARE, USA

GREAT LAKES MICROGRAPHICS CORPORATION                   MICHIGAN, USA

INFORMATION & IMAGE TECHNOLOGY OF AMERICA. INC.*        FLORIDA, USA

MICRO-PRO, INC.                                         NEW YORK, USA

MP SERVICES, INC.                                       NEW YORK, USA

NATIONAL REPRODUCTIONS CORP.                            MICHIGAN, USA




*D/B/A LASON SYSTEMS, INC. - SOUTHEAST
Exhibit 31.1



OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Robert McMurrey, Chairman of the Board of Teletouch Communications, Inc., certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Teletouch
Communications, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or
not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 14, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert McMurrey                  
|                       |  | Robert McMurrey Chairman of the Board
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           5
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          5,277,000
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                9,865,000
<PP&E>                                          1,716,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    386,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 30,825,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             800,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                            1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,094,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   30,825,000
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                1,378,000
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   7,457,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  385,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                161,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,625,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,625,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,625,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.74)




</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5625 

To amend the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 to provide for a temporary 

increase in the maximum loan guaranty amount for housing loans guaranteed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2008 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 to provide 

for a temporary increase in the maximum loan guaranty 

amount for housing loans guaranteed by the Secretary 

of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5625 IH

1 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN MAXIMUM LOAN 

2 GUARANTY AMOUNT FOR HOUSING LOANS 

3 GUARANTEED BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

4 AFFAIRS. 

5 Section 201(a) of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 

6 (Public Law 110–185; 122 Stat. 613) is amended by add7 ing at the end the following new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(3) VA GUARANTEED HOUSING LOANS.—Not9 withstanding subparagraph (C) of section 

10 3703(a)(1) of title 38, United States Code, for pur11 poses of any loan described in that section for which 

12 the mortgagee issues a loan commitment during the 

13 period beginning on February 13, 2008, and ending 

14 at the end of December 31, 2008, the term ‘max15 imum guaranty amount’ means the dollar amount 

16 that is equal to 25 percent of the amount deter17 mined under paragraph (2) of this subsection for a 

18 single-family residence located in the area in which 

19 the residence for which the loan is made is located.’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1100/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1100/2013 of 5 November 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1100/2013                     

# of 5 November 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. MANUEL.

No. COA06-207.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (04CRS85958)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. BURCH.

No. COA05-1226.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 19, 2006

Certification Date October 9, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (03CRS57557)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN RE I.S.K.

No. COA06-1366.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05JT916).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
STATE v. MILLER

No. COA06-727

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS217502, 04CRS217503, 04CRS217504, 04CRS52168).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EAST MARKET STREET SQUARE, INC., f/k/a Bogues/Alston Development Corporation v. TYCORP PIZZA IV, INC. and Gilbert T. Bland.

No. 123P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2006.

J. Patrick Haywood, Kenneth R. Keller, Greensboro, for Gilbert T. Bland.

Jennifer N. Fountain, Greensboro, for East Market St. Square.

Prior report: 175 N.C.App. 628, 625 S.E.2d 191.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th day of March 2006 by Defendant (Gilbert T. Bland) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of December 2006."
**EXHIBIT 11**

**YOUNGBROADCASTING INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**RECOMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS**

| ** **                                                                                                               | ** ** | **THREE MONTHS ENDED** | ** **  | **SIX MONTHS ENDED** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------|-------------|----------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                                                                               | ** ** | **June 30**       | ** **  | **June 30**     | ** ** | **June 30** | ** ** | **June 30** | ** ** |
| ** **                                                                                                               | ** ** | **2006**               | ** **  | **2007**             | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** |
| Shares of common  stock outstanding for the entire period.                                                               |       | 20,958,869             |        | 20,138,095           |       | 20,849,065 |   | 20,027,108 |   |
| Issuance of 237,442 and 282,782 shares of common  stock to the Company’s defined contribution plan in 2006 and 2007 |       | 117,822                |        | 118,750              |       | 157,512 |   | 180,441 |   |
| Issuance of 526,650 and 332,052 shares of common  stock under the 2004 equity incentive plan in 2006 and 2007            |       | 146,657                |        | 102,398              |       | 54,265 |   | 26,919 |   |
| Issuance of 11,376 shares of common stock to the  employee stock purchase plan in 2006                              | ** ** | **—**             |        | **—**           |       | 10,829 |   | **—** |   |
| Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding                                                                      |       | 21,223,347             |        | 20,359,243           |       | 21,071,672 |   | 20,234,468 |   |
| Net loss                                                                                                                 |       | $                      | (10,988,310 | )                    | $          | (18,184,647 | ) | $ | (41,623,638 | ) | $ | (43,556,597 | ) |
| Net loss per  common share                                                                                               |       | $                      | (0.52       | )                    | $          | (0.89 | ) | $ | (1.98 | ) | $ | (2.15 | ) |

 

----
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1254/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1254/2013 of 2 December 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for cod in Skagerrak by vessels            flying the flag of The Netherlands         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1254/2013                     

# of 2 December 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for cod in Skagerrak by vessels flying the flag of The Netherlands

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
# L_2013265DE.01001601.xml

| 8.10.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 265/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 265/16

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 536/2013 der Kommission vom 11. Juni 2013 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 432/2012 zur Festlegung einer Liste zulässiger anderer gesundheitsbezogener Angaben über Lebensmittel als Angaben über die Reduzierung eines Krankheitsrisikos sowie die Entwicklung und die Gesundheit von Kindern

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160 vom 12. Juni 2013
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 160 vom 12. Juni 2013

Auf Seite 7, im Anhang, Eintrag „Docosahexaensäure (DHA)“, Spalte „Bedingungen für die Verwendung der Angabe“, letzter Satz:

anstatt:

„Wird die Angabe bei Nahrungsergänzungsmitteln und/oder angereicherten Lebensmitteln verwendet, sind die Verbraucher darüber zu unterrichten, dass eine tägliche Geamtaufnahme aus diesen Lebensmitteln von 5 g EPA und DHA kombiniert nicht überschritten werden darf.“

muss es heißen:

„Wird die Angabe bei Nahrungsergänzungsmitteln und/oder angereicherten Lebensmitteln verwendet, sind die Verbraucher darüber zu unterrichten, dass eine tägliche Gesamtaufnahme aus diesen Lebensmitteln von 5 g EPA und DHA kombiniert nicht überschritten werden darf.“

Auf Seite 8, im Anhang, Eintrag „Fructose“, Spalte „Angabe“:

anstatt:

„Der Verzehr von Lebensmitteln, die Fructose enthalten, führt zu einem geringeren Glucoseanstieg im Blut im Vergleich zu Lebensmitteln, die Sucrose oder Glucose enthalten“

muss es heißen:

„Der Verzehr von Lebensmitteln, die Fructose enthalten, führt zu einem geringeren Glucoseanstieg im Blut im Vergleich zu Lebensmitteln, die Saccharose oder Glucose enthalten“.

Auf Seite 8, im Anhang, Eintrag „Fructose“, Spalte „Bedingungen für die Verwendung der Angabe“:

anstatt:

„Damit die Angabe zulässig ist, sollte in zuckergesüßten Lebensmitteln oder Getränken Glucose und/oder Sucrose durch Fructose ersetzt werden, so dass die Verringerung des Glucose- und/oder Sucrosegehalts in diesen Lebensmitteln oder Getränken mindestens 30 % beträgt.“

muss es heißen:

„Damit die Angabe zulässig ist, sollte in zuckergesüßten Lebensmitteln oder Getränken Glucose und/oder Saccharose durch Fructose ersetzt werden, so dass die Verringerung des Glucose- und/oder Saccharosegehalts in diesen Lebensmitteln oder Getränken mindestens 30 % beträgt.“

---