alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Air Force

Army

Navy/Marines

Other Defense

12%

70%

9%

8%

$1.1

$0.9 $1.0

$0.7 $0.7 $0.7 $0.7

$0.4

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

58%

3%

38%

0%

Construcon: 6%

Research and

 Development: 1%

Service: 46%

Supplies and

 Equipment: 47%

Civilian: 20% Acve Duty: 19%

Naonal Guard/

Reserve: 61%

General Dynamics

Esterline Technologies

Lockheed Marn

Sundt

AECOM

Pine Bluff Sand and Gravel

Aerojet Rocketdyne

PPG Industries

Southern Contracng

Mobley Contractors

$67.2 M

$27.2 M

$27.1 M

$22.5 M

$17.0 M

$14.0 M

$12.6 M

$12.3 M

$9.2 M

$8.4 M

Pulaski

Sebasan

Jefferson

Benton

Craighead

Washington

Faulkner

Garland

Union

White

County

10,372

1,750

875

701

290

275

249

236

215

212

Total*

3,422

32

11

ND

ND

13

ND

ND

ND

ND

Acve Duty

   Military

1,906

376

754

28

20

ND

21

60

ND

10

Civilian

 FISCAL YEAR 2017

ARKANSAS

   DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Con ense Con ense Contractors (M=millions)

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

   DEFENSE PERSONNEL

Allocaons, By Type

Allocaons, By Service

$700.7 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

$700.7 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

18,319

TOTAL PERSONNEL

18,319

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Loc sonnel Loc sonnel Locaons

*Total also includes unif al also includes uniformed Na ormed Naonal Guar onal Guard and R d and Reserve units. e units.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

22 Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017
AF Actve AF Guard Army Actve Army Guard

ARKANSASARKANSASARKANSAS ARKANSAS

#43 #43 0.3% $373 #43 #35 #36

$1.1 B

SPENT IN STATE

0.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S.

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.4 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

18,319 NUMBER

OF PERSONNEL

$0.7 B PERSONNEL

SPENDING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)(M=millions) (M=millions)

Ouachita County

$250.4 M

Pulaski County

$117.9 M

Calhoun County

$81.7 M

Jeferson County

$51.1 M

Prairie County

$16.3 M

White County

$11.3 M

Carroll County

$10.5 M

Sebastan County

$10.3 M

Columbia County

$7.8 M

Garland County

$5.6 M Ouachita

Pulaski

Calhoun

Jeferson

Prairie

White

Carroll

Sebastan

Columbia

Garland

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)(M=millions) (M=millions)

Pulaski County

$468.6 M

Jeferson County

$55.1 M

Sebastan County

$49.6 M

Benton County

$9.8 M

Hot Spring County

$8.4 M

Polk County

$6.7 M

Garland County

$6.3 M

Washington County

$6.1 M

Union County

$6.0 M

Craighead County

$5.5 M

Pulaski

Jeferson

Sebastan

Benton

Hot Spring

Polk Garland

Washington

Union

Craighead

Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017 23
#### In the Matter of Katherine James et al., Appellants, v New York City Board of Elections, Respondent, and Elizabeth R. Joana, Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 751]

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to validate a petition designating Katherine James and Leonard James as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2005, for the Republican Farty positions of Member of State Committee, Female and Male, respectively, from the 32nd Assembly District, the petitioners appeal from a final order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kelly, J.), dated August 11, 2005, which, after a hearing, among other things, in effect, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the final order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellants’ designating petition did not contain the required number of valid signatures *(see*Election Law § 6-136 [2]).

The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. H. Miller, J.P., S. Miller, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
      E. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








*/s/
                Edward E. Cohen*Edward
                E. CohenChief
                Executive OfficerAugust 14,
                2007
# Council Decision of 22 January 2013 appointing two Dutch members of the Committee of the Regions (2013/58/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 22 January 2013

# appointing two Dutch members of the Committee of the Regions

# (2013/58/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Dutch Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)Two members’ seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Mr J.C.                              (Co) VERDAAS and Ms A.E. (Anne) BLIEK-DE JONG,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as members for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 25 January 2015:                  
          -  Ms Annemieke TRAAG, *member of the Executive Council of the Province of Gelderland*,                         
          -  Mr A. GIJSBERTS, *member of the Executive Council of the Province of Flevoland*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 22 January 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

M. Noonan                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
IN RE T.M.W.

No. COA06-1158.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Wake (05J723).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
In re A.R.G. appealed by Father, Bruce G.

No. 378A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Annick Lenoir-Peek, Houston, TX, for Bruce G.

Anthony H. Morris, Asheboro, for Pitt County DSS.

Nancy Ray, Lexington, KY, for Guardian ad Litem.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 631 S.E.2d 146.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Respondent on the 24th day of July 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Respondent's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.

Respondent shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


<Table>
<Caption>

SUBSIDIARIES OF ON COMMAND CORPORATION          STATE OF INCORPORATION       OTHER BUSINESS NAMES
----------------------------------------        ----------------------       -------------------------
<S>                                             <C>                          <C>
Hotel Digital Network, Inc.                     California                   Instant Media Network

On Command Development Corporation              Delaware                     None

On Command Video Corporation                    Delaware                     None

OCV Iberia S.A.                                 Spain                        None

Spectradyne International, Inc.                 Delaware                     None

On Command Argentina S.R.L.                     Argentina                    None

On Command Canada, Inc.                         Ontario, Canada              None
</Table>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,871,864
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               20,659,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,471,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,879,605
<PP&E>                                       7,392,335
<DEPRECIATION>                                 888,616
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             116,558,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       18,325,866
<BONDS>                                     25,212,921
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,421
<OTHER-SE>                                  66,635,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               116,558,391
<SALES>                                      7,260,797
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,266,779
<CGS>                                        6,882,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               39,125,925
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,025,105
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,112,867
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (198,565)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (198,565)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (323,346)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (521,911)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.08)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.08)
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT REPRESENTS BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH SFAS NO. 128 "EARNINGS PER SHARE."
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1283/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1283/2013 of 10 December 2013 correcting the French language version of Regulation (EC) No 865/2006            laying down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species            of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1283/2013                     

# of 10 December 2013

# correcting the French language version of Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 laying down detailed rules concerning the implementation                        of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora                           by regulating trade therein(1), and in particular Article 19(2), (3) and (4) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)There is an error in the French language version of Annex VII to Commission Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 of 4 May 2006 laying                              down detailed rules concerning the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of species of wild                              fauna and flora by regulating trade therein(2). The error, which does not affect the validity of permits and certificates or permit and certificate applications, concerns                              the code assigned to the description of the specimen ‘Caviar’.

(2)Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

(3)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Trade in Wild Fauna and                              Flora,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Concerns only the French language version.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 December 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 61, 3.3.1997, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 166, 19.6.2006, p. 1.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Omtool, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Voelk,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledgethat:

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ ROBERT  L. VOELK      |   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|
| Robert L. Voelk           |   |   |
| *Chief Executive Officer* |   |   |
| March 26, 2007       |   |   |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JEFFREY CUTLER, EAST LAMPETER TOWNSHIP TAX COLLECTOR,

Petitioner

v.

AMBER GREEN, LANCASTER COUNTY TREASURER, RALPH HUTCHINSON,

EAST LAMPETER TOWNSHIP

MANAGER AND BENTLEY RIDGE APARTMENTS,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 29 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of April

, 2017

, the “Extraordinary Petition for

Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Summary Judgment” and the Application for Stay

are DENIED

.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 97-30932

_______________________

ITOCHU INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WESTERN AVENIER MV, ET AL.

Defendants,

WESTERN BULK SHIPPING A/S;

WESTERN BULK CARRIERS K/S,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-2513-K)

_________________________________________________

August 7, 1998

Before WISDOM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-appellant Itochu International, Inc. appeals from

the district court’s ruling that defendants-appellees, as owner and

operator of the vessel in question, are entitled to protection

under the §1304(2)(q) exception of the Carriage of Goods By Sea Act
1 45 F.3d 941 (5th Cir. 1995).

(COGSA) to their general COGSA duty to load and stow cargo

properly. In so holding the court relied in large part on our

opinion in Tubacex, Inc. v. M/V Risan.

1 After concluding that

Itochu had proved its prima facie case, the district court found

that Itochu had controlled the loading process of the cargo in

question under an exclusive Charter Party with Western Bulk, so

that the damage to the steel cargo in question resulted without the

fault or privity of Western Bulk.

We have carefully reviewed the operable facts as reflected by

the record and the legal arguments as advanced by able counsel in

their appellate briefs and orally before the Court, as a result of

which we conclude that the judgment of the district court should be

affirmed, essentially for the reasons advanced by that court.

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media West LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: August 7, 2009
    By:
    /s/ David C. SwansonDavid C. SwansonChairman of the Board of Directors and

Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit
32.1**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Income Fund I (the “Fund”), on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the
President of the Manager and of the Fund, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:
 
 (1)  the
Report of the Fund filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
 
 
 
 /s/
James A. Coyne
 James A.
Coyne
 President
of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 August
10, 2005
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 421/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 421/2013 of 7 May 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Porc du Sud-Ouest (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 421/2013                     

# of 7 May 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Porc du Sud-Ouest                        (PGI)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 entered into force on 3 January                              2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications                              and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs(2).

(2)Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France’s application to register the name ‘Porc du Sud-Ouest’ was                              published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name                              should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.1.****Fresh meat (and offal)**U.K.

#### FRANCEU.K.

Porc du Sud-Ouest (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.                           

3

OJ C 162, 8.6.2012, p.20