alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                 DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                         8,859,888
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  1,743,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              12,248,734
<PP&E>                                                        90,143,670
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 6,084,157
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               127,692,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          7,951,844
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                          168
<COMMON>                                                         118,833
<OTHER-SE>                                                    46,876,914
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 127,692,489
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              51,173,422
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 19,502,095
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             6,597,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                2,820,991
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   1,153,801
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            1,632,584
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  (459,800)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   1,172,784
<EPS-BASIC>                                                         (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       (.01)



</TABLE>
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: October 17, 2005By:
    
    /s/ John J. DeeJohn J. DeeChief Financial Officer andSenior Vice President(Principal Financial Officer)
STATE v. McNEAL.

No. COA06-11.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (04CRS24591).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jesse Levender JOHNSON.

No. 631P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Thomas F. Loflin, III, Durham, for Jesse Levender Johnson.

Ashby T. Ray, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of November 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130048 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130048 

 COA: 261622 

Calhoun CC: 00-004624-FC 

DESHAWN D. WITCHER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0424 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2006 

Clerk
# C_2013159EN.01000101.xml

| 5.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 16 May 2013

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2013/000/)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted to the Council by the Commission in the category of Employees' representatives,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015.

2

| (2) | A member's seat is available for Spain on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Employees' representatives, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat is available for Spain on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Employees' representatives,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following person is hereby appointed as a member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2015:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONS:

| SPAIN | Mr Francisco Javier LÓPEZ |
| --- | --- |

SPAIN

Mr Francisco Javier LÓPEZ

Done at Brussels, 16 May 2013.

For the Council

The President

R. QUINN

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 228, 31.7.2012, p. 3.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 31.2

     CERTIFICATIONS OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Tim Dean-Smith, principal financial officer for the Company, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mailkey Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

        c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

        a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual
report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date
of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Dated:  June 29, 2005                       /s/   Tim Dean-Smtih
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            By: Tim Dean-Smith
                                            Its: Principal Financial, Director
IN RE A.A.W.

No. COA06-550.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Burke (03J156).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

43 KA 12-01615 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL STANTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

REBECCA CURRIER, AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Cayuga County Court (Thomas G. Leone, J.), entered June 22, 2012. The order denied the application of defendant for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his application for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46, the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act. As the People correctly concede, this appeal is not moot even though the maximum sentence for defendant’s original drug conviction has now expired. Defendant “was sentenced in another case involving a later crime while he was still imprisoned on the earlier charge. If he is resentenced on the earlier charge, that resentencing could affect the time credited toward his later sentence” ( People v Paulin , 17 NY3d 238, 242; see People v Nieves , 94 AD3d 671, 672).
We nevertheless conclude that County Court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice required denial of his application ( see People v Gatewood , 87 AD3d 825, 826, lv denied 17 NY3d 903). It is well established that “[r]esentencing is not automatic, and courts may deny the applications of persons who ‘have shown by their conduct that they do not deserve relief from their sentences’ ” ( People v Colon , 110 AD3d 438, 438, quoting Paulin , 17 NY3d at 244). Although defendant is a military veteran who participated in many vocational programs while incarcerated and had only two minor disciplinary infractions during his incarceration, “[t]he court properly concluded that defendant’s chronic inability to control his behavior while at liberty outweighed” his positive institutional record ( People v Correa , 83 AD3d 555, 556, lv denied 17 NY3d 805; see People v Hurst , 83 AD3d 499, 499, lv denied 17 NY3d 796;-2- 43 KA 12-01615
cf. People v Berry , 89 AD3d 954, 955-956).

Entered: February 7, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
# L_2013316EN.01004401.xml

| 27.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 316/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 316/44

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 19 November 2013

appointing a French member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2013/683/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the French Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1).

| (2) | A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Gilbert BROS, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Gilbert BROS,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Christophe HILLAIRET, Membre du Bureau de l’APCA, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 19 November 2013.

For the Council

The President

L. LINKEVIČIUS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.

1

---
JONES v. CITY OF DURHAM.

No. 137A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 24, 2006.

Stewart W. Fisher, Carlos E. Mahoney, William S. Mills, Durham, for Linda Jones.

Mark A. Davis, Raleigh, for County Commissioners, et al.

Bradley N. Schulz, T. Marie Mobley, Smithfield, for Academy of Trial Lawyers.

The following order has been entered on the corrected motion filed on the 21st day of April 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (City of Durham, et al.) shall have up to and including the 12th day of May 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of April 2006."
BAREFOOT v. HUDSON, et al.

No. 52P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

Jimmy Thorton, Sheriff, for Thorton.

George Dewey Hudson, Jr., District Attorney, for Hudson.

Jamie B. Askins, Assistant District Attorney, for Askins.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th day of January 2007 by Plaintiff for Relief:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of March 2007."
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy T. Yates, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | By: | /s/TIMOTHY T. YATESTimothy T. Yates
      Executive Vice President and
      Chief Financial Officer
      February 21, 2008 | 
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
GOOD HOPE v. NCDHHS.

No. 58A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 25, 2006.

Susan M. Fradenburg, Greensboro, William W. Stewart, Jr., Raleigh, for Good Hope Health System.

C. Winston Gilchrist, Lillington, for Town of Lillington.

Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Marcus Lodge, for NCDHHS.

Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Wallace C. Hollowell, III, Benjamin N. Thompson, K. Edward Greene, Kathleen A. Naggs, Raleigh, Denise M. Gunter, Winston-Salem, for Betsy Johnson Regional Hosp.

S. Todd Hemphill, Diane E. Ricketts, Raleigh, for Amisub of NC.

Forrest W. Campbell, Jr., for NC Hospital Asso.

The following order has been entered on the consent motion filed on the 24th day of July 2006 by Petitioners and Petitioner Intervenors for Extension of Time until August 15, 2006 to Respond to Respondent-Intervenor-Appellees' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Take Judicial Notice:

*297"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 25th day of July 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         147,649
<SECURITIES>                                   473,831
<RECEIVABLES>                                  383,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (260,020)
<INVENTORY>                                    260,748
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               907,622
<PP&E>                                         3,350,156
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,203,104)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,385,749
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,751,287
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       12,670
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,474,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,385,749
<SALES>                                        464,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               464,974
<CGS>                                          196,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  196,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,544,648
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             172,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,689,912)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,689,912)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,689,912)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.22)



</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Edwin Marcial, Respondent, v John Ruiz, Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 899]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline W. Silbermann, J.), entered August 17, 2005, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Silbermann, J., without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.33-97450, No. 33-86116, No. 333-14601 and No. 333-48446) on Form S-8 of PVFCapital Corp. of our report dated July 16, 2004, relating to the consolidatedstatements of financial condition of PVF Capital Corp. as of June 30, 2004 and2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30,2004, which report appears in the June 30, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K ofPVF Capital Corp.    /s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLC Crowe, Chizek and Company LLC
Cleveland, Ohio
In the Matter of C.B., J.B., Th.B., and Ti.B., minor children.

No. 586A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2007.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 636 S.E.2d 336 (2006), reversing and remanding an adjudication order entered 17 May 2005 by Judge Phyllis Gorham in District Court, Pender County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 April 2007.

No brief for petitioner.

Deana K. Fleming, Associate Counsel for North Carolina Guardian ad Litem Program, and R. Kent Harrell, GAL Attorney Advocate, for appellant Guardian ad Litem.

Sofie W. Hosford, Wilmington, for respondent-appellee father.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision in this case.