alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 453/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 453/2013 of 7 May 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications (Lakeland Herdwick (PDO))         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 453/2013                     

# of 7 May 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Lakeland Herdwick                        (PDO))                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006                              of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs(2).

(2)Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Lakeland Herdwick’                              was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name                              should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.1.****Fresh meat (and offal)**U.K.

#### UNITED KINGDOMU.K.

Lakeland Herdwick (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.                           

3

OJ C 162, 8.6.2012, p. 16.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 41357-41358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14762]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree

    In accordance with Departmental Policy, 28 CFR 50.7, notice is 
hereby given that a proposed Consent Decree in United States v. Trager 
Limestone LLC, Case No. 20-cv-6060, was lodged with the United States 
District Court for the Western District of Missouri on July 5, 2022.
    This proposed Consent Decree concerns a complaint filed by the 
United States against Defendant Trager Limestone LLC, pursuant to 
Sections 309(b), (d), and 311(b) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 
1319(b), (d), and 1321(b), to obtain injunctive relief from and impose 
civil penalties against the Defendant for violating Sections 301(a) and 
311(j) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1311(a) and 1321(j), by 
discharging pollutants without a permit into waters of the United 
States, and for failing to meet the requirements of the Environmental 
Protection Agency's ``Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures 
Plan'' regulations. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these 
allegations by requiring the Defendant to restore the impacted areas, 
record a conservation easement, and pay a civil penalty.
    The Department of Justice will accept written comments relating to 
this proposed Consent Decree for thirty (30) days from the date of 
publication of this Notice. Please address comments to Phillip R. 
Dupr[eacute], Department of Justice, Environment and Natural Resources 
Division, Environmental Defense Section, Post Office Box 7611, 
Washington, DC 20044, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f1f1a0d0c0002020a011b300a0b1c410a011d0b2f1a1c0b000541080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7707021514181a1a12190328121304591219051337020413181d59101801">[email protected]</span></a>, and refer to 
United States v. Trager Limestone LLC, DJ No. 90-5-1-1-21606.
    The proposed Consent Decree may be examined at the Clerk's Office, 
United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, 
Charles Evans Whittaker United States Courthouse, 400 E 9th Street, 
Kansas City, MO 64106. In addition, the proposed Consent Decree may be 
examined

[[Page 41358]]

electronically at https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.

Cherie Rogers,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Defense Section, Environment and 
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-14762 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                      [PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LETTERHEAD]
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
of Lason, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-18551) of our report dated March 31,
1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Lason, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and for the
years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, which report is included in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 
March 31, 1999
STATE of North Carolina v. James Fredrick SHUFORD.

No. 433P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

J. Clark Fischer, Winston-Salem, for Shuford.

Jason T. Campbell, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th day of August 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."
EXHIBIT 31.3
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 302 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATIONS
 
 I, Thomas B. Specketer, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MidAmerican Energy Company;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: May 4, 2004
 /s/ Thomas B. Specketer
 Thomas B. Specketer
 Vice President and Controller
 (chief financial officer)
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 121/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 121/2013 of 11 February 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 121/2013                     

# of 11 February 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 February 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. MILLER.

COA06-26.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 7, 2006.

Certification Date November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (03CRS252301).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 331/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 331/2013 of 10 April 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 331/2013                     

# of 10 April 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 April 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
EXHIBIT 21.1

INTELLISYNC CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT






|Subsidiaries                      |  |  |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|--------------------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------
|Intellisync Bulgaria
Ltd.         |  |  |  | Bulgaria                                    
|Intellisync
K.K.                  |  |  |  | Japan                                       
|Intellisync Romania
SRL           |  |  |  | Romania                                     
|NetMind Technologies,
Inc.        |  |  |  | California,
USA                             
|Pumatech
International            |  |  |  | California,
USA                             
|Search Software America Pty.
Ltd. |  |  |  | Australia                                   
|SPL WorldGroup
Ltd.               |  |  |  | United
Kingdom                              
|SPL WorldGroup Software,
Inc.     |  |  |  | Delaware,
USA                               
|Starfish Software,
Inc.           |  |  |  | California,
USA                             
|Synchrologic,
Inc.                |  |  |  | Georgia,
USA                                
|Synchrologic Deutschland
GmbH     |  |  |  | Germany                                     
|Synchrologic Europe
Ltd.          |  |  |  | United
Kingdom                              
|Synchrologic Italia
S.r.l.        |  |  |  | Italy                                       

All subsidiaries of the registrant are wholly-owned.

---
Order filed Jul y 10 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 14

- 00 297

- C V

____________ IN RE L. CHARLES MONCLA, JR., J. C LARKE LEGLER , II , WILLIAM RESTREPO, DANIEL T. LAYTON, LAYTON CORPORATION, PLATINUM ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC., AND PLATINUM ENERGY SOLUTIONS, INC., Relator s

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 234 th D istrict Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20 12

- 30972



### CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On April 2 1, 2014 , relators
, L. Charles Moncla, Jr., J. Clarke Legler, II, William Restrepo, Daniel T. Layton, Layton Corporation, Platinum Energy Holdings, Inc., and Platinum Energy Solutions, Inc., filed a petition for writ of2 mandamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov = t Code Ann. ' 22.221. In the petition,

r elator s asked that this court compel The Honorable Wesley War d , Judge of the
2 34 th District Court, Harris Cou nty, Texas , (1) vacate his March 31, 2014 order overruling relators’ special exceptions enter ed in trial court cause number
2012

- 30972 , styled Starstream Capital, LLC, et al. v. L. Charles Moncla, Jr., et al. ; (2) grant the special exceptions; (3) strike real parties in interest’s pleadings; and (4) dismiss the case with p rejudice.

On June 2, 2014, relator s informed this court that the parties have agreed to settle the underlying dispute, subject to the execution of a mutually acceptable settlement agreement. W e abate d the case for thirty days and directed the parties to advise the court of the status of the settlement. On July 3, 2014, relators advised this court that the parties are still continuing to work towards a settlement agreement.

T he refore, the abatement of this case is continued f or an additional thirty days, at which time the parties are directed to advise the court of the status of the
settlement. The original proceeding will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the parties file a motion to dismiss the original proce edin g or other dispositive
motion. The c ourt also will consider an appropriate motion to reinstate th e original proceeding, or the court may reinstate the original proceeding on its own motion

.
PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jamison

.
CABLE CO. v. HIGHLANDS CABLE GROUP, LTD.

No. COA06-512.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Johnston (05CVD327).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LEROY FORD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-2021

[February 24, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Jeffrey Hendriks, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562020MO000255A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Cynthia L. Anderson, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. SolagesJones, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# L_2013305EN.01001801.xml

| 15.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 305/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 305/18

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUCAP SAHEL NIGER/2/2013

of 12 November 2013

on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger)

(2013/656/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2012/392/CFSP of 16 July 2012 on the European Union CSDP Mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (1), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Under Article 9(1) of Decision 2012/392/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising the political control and strategic direction of the European Union CSDP Mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) including, in particular, the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Under Article 9(1) of Decision 2012/392/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising the political control and strategic direction of the European Union CSDP Mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) including, in particular, the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of Mr Filip DE CEUNINCK as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Niger, ad interim, for the period from 1 November to 31 December 2013, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of Mr Filip DE CEUNINCK as Head of Mission of EUCAP Sahel Niger, ad interim, for the period from 1 November to 31 December 2013,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Filip DE CEUNINCK is hereby appointed as Head of Mission of the European Union CSDP Mission to Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger), ad interim, for the period from 1 November to 31 December 2013.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

It shall apply from 1 November 2013.

Done at Brussels, 12 November 2013.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 187, 17.7.2012, p. 48.

1

---