alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gerald R. Tuskey, Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.









November 10, 2005

/s/Gerald R. Tuskey

Date

Gerald R. Tuskey,

Chief Financial Officer and Director
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5631 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5631

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ``Corporal 
                Bradley T. Arms Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CORPORAL BRADLEY T. ARMS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Bradley T. Arms Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5631

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ``Corporal 
                Bradley T. Arms Post Office Building''.
```
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-00456-CR

NO. 09-18-00457-CR

NO. 09-18-00458-CR

____________________

JULIUS JERMAINE JORDAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 128th District Court

Orange County, Texas

Trial Cause Nos. A170058-R, A170061-R, and A170064-R 

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On November 1, 2018, the trial court signed orders nunc pro tunc granting 

credit for jail time in trial court case numbers A170058-R, A170061-R, and 

A170064-R. Notice of appeal was due to be filed by December 3, 2018. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 26.2(a)(1). On December 6, 2018, the trial court clerk received and filed a 

notice of appeal dated December 4, 2018. On December 10, 2018, we notified Jordan 
2

that an extension of time was required because the notice of appeal was filed late but 

within fifteen days of the date it was due. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 26.3; see 

also Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a). Jordan filed a motion for extension of time for trial court 

case number A170061-R with the trial court clerk on December 21, 2018. The 

motion was dated December 17, 2018, but was not addressed to the proper court. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). No motion for extension of time was filed with the Court 

of Appeals within fifteen days of the last day for perfecting the appeals. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 26.3.

On January 8, 2019, we notified the parties that the appeals would be 

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Jordan filed a response in which he argued that he 

perfected his appeal timely because he submitted the notice of appeal to the prison 

mail room officials within thirty days of the date that he received notice that the trial 

court had signed orders nunc pro tunc. However, the time for perfecting an appeal 

runs from the date the order is signed, not the date the defendant learns the order has 

been signed. See Davis v. State, 502 S.W.3d 803, 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016);

Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108, 109–10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). We lack the 

authority to suspend the rules with regard to the time for perfecting an appeal. See 

Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210(Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
3

APPEALS DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 CHARLES KREGER 

 Justice

Submitted on February 5, 2019

Opinion Delivered February 6, 2019

Do Not Publish 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Janus Hotels and Resorts, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Louis S. Beck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:


          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





/s/ Louis S. Beck
------------------------------
Louis S. Beck
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2003
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1111/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1111/2013 of 5 November 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications [Lietuviškas varškės sūris (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1111/2013                     

# of 5 November 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Lietuviškas varškės                        sūris (PGI)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Lithuania’s application to register the name ‘Lietuviškas varškės                              sūris’ was published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (2).

(2)As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name                              ‘Lietuviškas varškės sūris’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.3.****Cheeses**U.K.

#### LITHUANIAU.K.

Lietuviškas varškės sūris (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 57, 27.2.2013, p. 24.
IN RE B.D.

No. COA06-1140.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 20, 2007.

Certification Date March 12, 2007.

Appeal from Gaston (95J316).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5551 

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to implement the 

increase provided under the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 

2008, in the amount of funds made available for the compensation 

of attorneys representing indigent defendants in the District of Columbia 

courts, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2008 

Mr. DAVIS of Illinois (for himself and Ms. NORTON) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to 

implement the increase provided under the District of 

Columbia Appropriations Act, 2008, in the amount of 

funds made available for the compensation of attorneys 

representing indigent defendants in the District of Columbia courts, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5551 IH

1 SECTION 1. IMPLEMENTATION OF INCREASE PROVIDED IN 

2 FUNDING FOR COMPENSATION OF ATTOR3 NEYS REPRESENTING INDIGENT DEFEND4 ANTS IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURTS. 

5 (a) INCREASE IN HOURLY RATE.—Section 11— 

6 2604(a), District of Columbia Official Code, is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘$65 per hour’’ and inserting ‘‘$80 per hour’’. 

8 (b) INCREASE IN CAPS ON TOTAL COMPENSATION

9 PAID FOR PARTICULAR CASES.—Section 11—2604(b), 

10 District of Columbia Official Code, is amended to read as 

11 follows: 

12 ‘‘(b) The compensation to be paid to an attorney ap13 pointed pursuant to this chapter shall not exceed the fol14 lowing maximum amounts: 

15 ‘‘(1) For representation of a defendant before 

16 the Superior Court of the District of Columbia for 

17 misdemeanors or felonies, the maximum amount set 

18 forth in section 3006A(d)(2) of title 18, United 

19 States Code, for representation of a defendant be20 fore the United States magistrate judge or the dis21 trict court for misdemeanors or felonies (as the case 

22 may be). 

23 ‘‘(2) For representation of a defendant before 

24 the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the max25 imum amount set forth in section 3006A(d)(2) of 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5551 IH

1 title 18, United States Code, for representation of a 

2 defendant in an appellate court. 

3 ‘‘(3) For representation of a defendant in post4 trial matters for misdemeanors or felonies, the 

5 amount applicable under paragraph (1) for mis6 demeanors or felonies (as the case may be).’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

8 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

9 respect to cases and proceedings initiated on or after the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# L_2013072EN.01000101.xml

| 15.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 72/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 72/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 222/2013

of 6 March 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Spargel aus Franken/Fränkischer Spargel/Franken-Spargel (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Spargel aus Franken’ or ‘Fränkischer Spargel’ or ‘Franken-Spargel’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Spargel aus Franken’ or ‘Fränkischer Spargel’ or ‘Franken-Spargel’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 March 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 125, 28.4.2012, p. 13.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

GERMANY

Spargel aus Franken/Fränkischer Spargel/Franken-Spargel (PGI)

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roger Cole, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 422]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated February 13, 1996 *(People v Cole,*224 AD2d 540 [1996]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 7, 1992.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz, 2*NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., H. Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
STATE v. ZAMORA.

No. COA05-1576.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 1, 2006.

Certification Date August 21, 2006.

Appeal from Haywood (05CRS50085).

Case without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. COOPER

No. COA06-946.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 19, 2007

Certification Date July 9, 2007.

Appeal from Halifax (05CRS53135).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Certification of CEO

In connection with theQuarterly Report of KH Funding Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for theperiod ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Harris, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company.
| Dated: May 22, 2007 |   | /s/ Robert L. Harris                  |
|---------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                |   | Robert L. Harris                      |
|                |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certificationaccompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by suchAct, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Suchcertification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

----
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Anthony S. Sadowski, Jr., Deceased. Joseph A.F. Sadowski, Appellant; Josephine Buonocore et al., Respondents.

[801 NYS2d 397]

In a proceeding to obtain letters of administration, the petitioner appeals from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County (Riordan, S.), dated September 22, 2003, which, inter alia, issued letters of administration to the Public Administrator of Nassau County.

Ordered that the decree is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The decedent, Anthony S. Sadowski, Jr., died intestate and was survived by the petitioner, who was his son, and the petitioner’s three siblings, who are the objectants herein. The *1035petitioner sought appointment as the administrator of the decedent’s estate. The objectants opposed the petition and requested that letters of administration issue to the Public Administrator of Nassau County (hereinafter the Public Administrator). After a hearing, the Surrogate’s Court, inter alia, denied the petition and issued letters of administration to the Public Administrator. We affirm.

On this record, it is apparent that the friction between the petitioner and the objectants would interfere with the proper and efficient administration of the estate, and that future cooperation is unlikely (see *Matter of Thompson,*232 AD2d 219 [1996]). Thus, the Surrogate’s Court providently exercised its discretion in refusing to issue letters of administration to the petitioner (see *Matter of Boyle,*224 AD2d 374, 375-376 [1996]) and, with the consent of the objectants, in issuing letters of administration to the Public Administrator (see *Matter of McCarthy,*49 AD2d 204 [1975]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either without merit, unpreserved for appellate review, or based on matter dehors the record. Adams, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur.
42798 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 136 / Monday, July 18, 2022 / Notices 

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS 

Veterans’ Advisory Committee on 

Rehabilitation: Notice of Meeting 

The Department of Veterans Affairs 

(VA) gives notice under the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 

App.2, that a meeting of the Veterans’ 

Advisory Committee on Rehabilitation 

(hereinafter the Committee) will be held 

virtually on Wednesday and Thursday, 

August 3–4, 2022 from 11 a.m. to 3:30 

p.m. EST. The meeting sessions are 

open to the public. 

The purpose of the Committee is to 

provide advice to the Secretary of VA on 

the rehabilitation needs of Veterans 

with disabilities and on the 

administration of VA’s Veteran 

rehabilitation programs. The Committee 

members will receive information on 

how VA assists Service members with 

transitioning to the civilian work force 

to include awareness of VA benefits, 

outreach efforts, and supported 

employment programs. In addition, the 

Committee will discuss and explore 

potential recommendations to be 

included in the next annual report. 

Although no time will be allocated for 

receiving oral presentations from the 

public, members of the public may 

submit written statements for review by 

the Committee to David Smith, 

Designated Federal Officer, Veterans 

Benefits Administration (28), 810 

Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 

20420, or at VACOR.VBACO@va.gov. In 

the communication, writers must 

identify themselves and state the 

organization, association, or persons 

they represent. 

For any members of the public who 

wish to attend virtually, please use the 

Microsoft Teams Meeting link: https://

teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/ 

19%3ameeting_

MGQ5NDZiMDItZWRhNy00

MzIyLWE4MTEtOWI5ODc4

MWI2YTE3%40thread.v2/ 

0?context=%7b%22Tid%22

%3a%22e95f1b23-abaf-45ee-821db7ab251ab3bf%22%2c%22Oid

%22%3a%228252bbc1-b123-48c8-aa1c6f43c7d548c7%22%7d. 

Or call in (audio only) Tel: + 1872– 

701–0185, United States, Chicago. 

Phone Conference ID: 845052697#. 

Dated: July 13, 2022. 

LaTonya L. Small, 

Federal Advisory Committee Management 

Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2022–15285 Filed 7–15–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES