alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE OF ACCELERATED APPEAL AND AUTOMATIC STAY OF TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS Page 1 of 2 CAUSE NO. 15-02186- 367

TAYLOR RICE § IN THE DISTRICT COURT §

Plaintiff

, §

v. § OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS § THE CITY OF KRUM, TEXAS, § §

Defendant. § 367 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOTICE OF ACCELERATED APPEAL AND AUTOMATIC STAY OF TRIAL COURT

PROCEEDINGS

To the Honorable Judge of this Court:

Under Rule 28 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, appellant City of Krum, the defendant in the above action, files this notice of accelerated appeal to the Second Court of Appeals

, Fort Worth, Texas.

Appellant desires to appeal from an interlocutory order entered in the above-styled and numbered case by this court on October 14, 2015. Specifically, appellant is a governmental unit appealing the court’s denial of the relief requested within Defendant’s Plea to the Jurisdiction, Plea in Abatement, and Supporting Brief (filed August 17, 2015)

.

Under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 51.014(b), this interlocutory appeal of a denial of a plea to the jurisdiction made by a governmental entity stays all proceedings in the trial court, including but not limited to trial proceedings, pending resolution of the appeal.

This appeal is accelerated under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 28.1(a)-(b) and Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 51.014(a)(8).

Dat e: October 30, 2015. Respectfully submitted,

By: /s/David Overcash
Clark McCoy

State Bar No. 90001803 cmccoy@wtmlaw.net

David Overcash

State Bar No. 24075516
david.overcash@wtmlaw.net 2591 Dallas Parkway, Suite 205 FILED: 10/30/2015 5:03:25 PM

SHERRI ADELSTEIN Denton County District Clerk By: Elizabeth Jones, Deputy ACCEPTED

02-15-00342-CV

SECOND COURT OF APPEALS

FORT WORTH, TEXAS

11/16/2015 12:25:53 PM

DEBRA SPISAK

CLERKNOTICE OF ACCELERATED APPEAL AND AUTOMATIC STAY OF TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS Page 2 of 2 Frisco, Texas 75034 972.712.3530 telephone

972.712.3540 facsimile

Lance Vanzant

Texas Bar No. 24009746
lvanzant@hbwvlaw.com Jeffrey A. Hines

Te xas Bar No. 09693000 jhines@hbwvlaw.com 512 W. Hickory, Suite 100

P.O. Box 50149 Denton, Texas 76206

940

- 387

- 3518

– Tel.

866

- 546

- 9247

– Fax

A TTORNEYS FOR C ITY OF K RUM , T EXAS

SERVICE CERTIFICATE



### A true and correct copy of this document was electronically served on

October 30, 2015

, at approximately the same date and time as this

document wa s electronically filed, via the methods listed below :

VIA ELEC TRONIC FILING AND

U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL RRR

# 7012 2920 0000 4194 4526
Richard Gladden 1200 W. University Dr, Suite 100 Denton, Texas 76201 Phone: (940) 323

- 9300 Facsimile: (940) 539

- 0093

___________________________ David Overcash
#### Fitzpatrick & Weller, Inc., Appellant, v Stephen Miller, Doing Business as Miller’s Saw Mill, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[802 NYS2d 292]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Larry M. Himelein, A.J.), entered December 16, 2004. The order denied plaintiffs motion to set aside the jury verdict.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside the jury verdict awarding Stephen Miller, doing business as Miller’s Saw Mill (defendant), damages on his counterclaim, plaintiff contends that Supreme Court admitted *1375evidence at trial in contravention of a prior decision of this Court *(Fitzpatrick & Weller v Miller,*309 AD2d 1273 [2003]). We reject that contention. A series of purchase order contracts between plaintiff and defendant provided that the rules of the National Hardwood Lumber Association (NHLA) governed their transactions. According to a rule of the NHLA, a buyer must report any difference between the amount of the seller’s invoice and the value of the shipment within 14 days after unloading. In our prior decision, we determined that the court properly denied that part of the motion of defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint as time-barred *(id.).*We rejected defendant’s contention that the 14-day rule constituted a statute of limitations, and we concluded that the purchase order at issue and the NHLA rule “ suggest[ed] nothing from which a shortened period of limitations can be inferred’ ” *(id.*at 1273, quoting *Hurlbut v Christiano,*63 AD2d 1116, 1117-1118 [1978]). We further determined that, in any event, a time period of 14 days was “ ‘unreasonably short’ and thus unenforceable” *(id.,*quoting *Planet Constr. Corp. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y.,*7 NY2d 381, 385 [1960]). Contrary to plaintiffs present contention, however, our prior decision did not preclude defendant from presenting evidence that the 14-day rule was a contractual obligation that plaintiff breached by failing to make a timely and valid rejection of the lumber.

Plaintiff further contends that the court erred in failing to instruct the jury that “the effectiveness of the [14-day rule should] be determined in accordance with the rules of reasonableness.” Plaintiff failed to preserve that contention for our review by failing to raise that specific contention in its objection to the court’s charge *(see Dailey v Keith,*306 AD2d 815, 816 [2003], *affd*1 NY3d 586 [2004]; *De Long v County of Erie,*60 NY2d 296, 306 [1983]). Where, as here, the charge is not fundamentally flawed, plaintiffs “failure to object to the charge at trial and before the jury retire[d] precludes [our] review” of plaintiffs contention *(Makovitzky v Spataro,*139 AD2d 704, 705 [1988]; *see*CPLR 4110-b; *see also Wagner Trading Co. v Walker Retail Mgt. Co.,*307 AD2d 701, 704 [2003]; *cf. Clark v Interlaken Owners, 2*AD3d 338, 340 [2003]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Smith, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
# L_2015329DE.01002801.xml

| 15.12.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 329/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 329/28

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 630/2013 der Kommission vom 28. Juni 2013 zur Änderung der Anhänge der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 999/2001 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates mit Vorschriften zur Verhütung, Kontrolle und Tilgung bestimmter transmissibler spongiformer Enzephalopathien

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 179 vom 29. Juni 2013
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 179 vom 29. Juni 2013

Seite 69, Anhang, Nummer 3 zur Änderung von Anhang VII Kapitel B Nummer 2.2.2. Buchstabe c Ziffer iii Satz 3 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 999/2001:

Anstatt:

„Männliche Zuchttiere des Genotyps ARR/ARR sind unverzüglich zu töten oder zu kastrieren und es sind umgehend alle Maßnahmen zu ergreifen, die zum schnellen Aufbau der genetischen Resistenz im Schafsbestand des Haltungsbetriebs zur Verfügung stehen, auch die gezielte Züchtung bzw. Keulung von Mutterschafen in vernünftigem Umfang, um die ARR-Frequenz zu erhöhen und das VRQ-Allel zu eliminieren.“

muss es heißen:

„Männliche Zuchttiere eines anderen Genotyps als ARR/ARR sind unverzüglich zu töten oder zu kastrieren und es sind umgehend alle Maßnahmen zu ergreifen, die zum schnellen Aufbau der genetischen Resistenz im Schafsbestand des Haltungsbetriebs zur Verfügung stehen, auch die gezielte Züchtung bzw. Keulung von Mutterschafen in vernünftigem Umfang, um die ARR-Frequenz zu erhöhen und das VRQ-Allel zu eliminieren.“

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                         603,840
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,123,176
<ALLOWANCES>                                    79,500
<INVENTORY>                                  6,258,928
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,330,619
<PP&E>                                       5,769,098
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,606,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,293,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,247,500
<BONDS>                                      5,012,092
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,220
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,815,538
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,293,105
<SALES>                                     43,492,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,492,459
<CGS>                                       14,967,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,967,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            23,431,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             821,105
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,272,232
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,792,865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,479,376
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                218,699
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,260,668
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FLORIDA PANTHERS HOLDINGS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          43,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,763
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,590
<PP&E>                                         475,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 600,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,236
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           282
<OTHER-SE>                                     300,871
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   600,392
<SALES>                                         54,262
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,185
<CGS>                                           41,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,793
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,848
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,804
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,260)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,260)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,260)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.74)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Young Broadcasting Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 17,
2008

/s/ VINCENT J. YOUNG Vincent J. Young Chief Executive Officer/s/ JAMES A. MORGAN James A. Morgan Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
STATE v. CAMPBELL

No. COA06-1074

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Robeson (99CRS3304, 99CRS3305).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Internet Infinity,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005
(the "Report"), I, George Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  June 28, 2005
                                                      /s/ George Morris
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     George Morris
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 10.13 to 2Q2005 Form 10-Q Third Amendment to the Weingarten Realty
      Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan


    
      

      

    

     

    Exhibit
      10.13

     

    
      THIRD
        AMENDMENT

      TO
        THE

      WEINGARTEN
        REALTY INVESTORS

      SUPPLEMENTAL
        EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

      


      WHEREAS,
        Weingarten Realty Investors (the “Sponsor”) adopted the Weingarten
        Realty Investors Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), adopted
        September 1, 2002; and

      


      WHEREAS,
        the Sponsor desires to amend the Plan to clarify that amounts which
        in
        prior years have been electively deferred by certain Participants are to
        be
        treated as a separate benefit;

      


      NOW,
        THEREFORE, the Sponsor amends the Plan as follows:

      


      Effective
        January 1, 2004, Article III, Section 3.1 of the Plan is
        amended by the addition of the following paragraph:

      


      The
        Administrator shall maintain a Deferral Contribution Account
        for each Participant who has made elective deferrals to the Plan. The initial
        balance in each Deferral Contribution Account shall be determined, as of
        December 31, 2003, by the Administrator. Each Deferral Contribution Account
        shall be adjusted thereafter to reflect interest at the rate specified in
        Section 5.2(b), distributions and any other appropriate adjustments as
        administratively determined in the discretion of the Administrator. A
        Participant shall be entitled to the amount credited to the Participant’s
        Deferral Contribution Account in addition to the Supplemental Benefit provided
        hereunder. A Participant’s Deferral Account shall not be considered part of such
        Participant’s funded Supplemental Benefit for purposes of determining the amount
        of Employer Credits under this Section 3.1, but shall be payable at the time
        a
        Participant’s Supplemental Benefit is payable. 

      


      


      IN
        WITNESS
        WHEREOF, the Sponsor has executed this instrument this 22
        day of October, 2004.

      


      Weingarten
        Realty
        Investors

      


      


      By: 
/s/
        Stephen Richter  

                                                   Title: 
SR
        VP,
        CFO
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-10-00609-CR

IN RE Guadalupe E. DIAZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 15, 2010

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On August 23, 2010, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered

relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

 PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1... This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2008-CR-5043A, in the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar

County, Texas, the Honorable Mary Román presiding.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Major ity and

Dissenting Opinion s filed August 12 , 2021

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 20

- 00399

- CV

IVAN PEREZ , Appellant

V.

CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Cour t

H a rris County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. 2019

- 70048

MEMORANDUM DISSENTING OPINION

The prayer to a ppellant ’ s motion to dismiss the appeal includes the following: “ For these reasons, Appellant asks the Court to grant this Unopposed Motion to Dismiss, wi th e ach party bearing own co sts on appeal. ” The certificate of conference reflects that appellee ’ s counsel is not opposed to the motion.2

The court properly gra n ts the motion

. But in t h e judgment dismissing the appeal , the Court errs in the taxation of cost s

. T exas Rule of Appellate P rocedure
42 .1(d ) states, “ Absent agreement of the parties , the court will t ax costs against the appellant

. ” T ex. R. App. P. 42.1 (d).

I could write about why “ not opposed ” is different fr om “ agree

. ” I suspect most lawyers would b e l e gitimately concerned if an appella te court hel d “ not opposed ” was synonymous with “ agree

. ” I also suspect a lot of lawyers would stop saying they were “ not opposed
, ” they would not necessari ly “ agree , ” and the y would likely offer “ no response

. ” That wou ld be a big waste of time.

B ut a picture can be worth the proverbial 1,0 0 0 words:

Nothing indicates the City agreed “ with each party bearing own costs on appeal

. ”
The court is simpl y wrong to disregard Rule 42.1(d)

.3

I dissent to the portion of th e judg m ent taxing costs against the C i ty of
Houston without its agreement

.

/s/ Charles A. Spain Justice

P a nel c onsists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Spain (Spain, J.
, dissenting)

.
GOETZ v. WYETH-LEDERLE VACCINES

No. COA06-35.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #V-00021).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(333-56423, 333-74335 and 333-75525) on Forms S-3, (333-66959 and 333-74063) on
Forms S-4 and (333-27553, 333-49121, 333-49145, 333-67721, 333-74331 and
333-78947) on Forms S-8, of Kroll Inc. of our report dated February 15, 2002
(March 21, 2002 as to Note 20), relating to the consolidated financial
statements of Kroll Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kroll Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.


Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York

March 25, 2002
RED DIRT PROPERTIES, LLC v. PRIME BLDG. CO., INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA

No. COA06-387

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Wake (04CVS10922).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                PUMA TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                         COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                        (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
EXHIBIT 11.1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             FISCAL YEAR 
                                                            ENDED JULY 31,
                                                                1997       
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                         <C>          
NET INCOME                                                      $660       
                                                              ------       
                                                              ------       

PRIMARY:

Weighted average common shares outstanding                    11,338       
Common stock equivalents:


  Preferred stock using the as if converted method                 -       
  Stock options using the treasury stock method                  475       
Shares related to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 83:
  Shares of common stock                                           -       
  Stock options                                                    -       
  Preferred stock using the as if converted method                 -       
  Convertible debenture using the as if converted method           -       
  Warrants                                                        38       
                                                              ------       

Shares used in computing primary net income per share         11,851       
                                                              ------       

PRIMARY NET INCOME PER SHARE                                   $0.06       
                                                              ------       
                                                              ------       

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>