alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE
                               UNITED STATES CODE

     I, Eric T. Steigerwalt, the Chief Financial Officer of MetLife Life and
Annuity Company of Connecticut (the "Company"), certify that (i) the Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the "Form
10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form
10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Date:    May 15, 2006

                                        /s/ Eric T. Steigerwalt
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Eric T. Steigerwalt
                                        Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to MetLife Life and Annuity Company of Connecticut and will be
retained by MetLife Life and Annuity Company of Connecticut and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Regulation (EU) No 527/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (repealed)Show full title

Regulation (EU) No 527/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 amending Council Regulation (EC)            No 1528/2007 as regards the exclusion of a number of countries from the list of regions or states which have concluded negotiations            (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Regulation (EU) No 527/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council

# of 21 May 2013

# amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1528/2007 as regards the exclusion of a number of countries from the list of regions or                        states which have concluded negotiations (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Regulation (EU) 2016/1076 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 applying the arrangements for products                                 originating in certain states which are part of the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) Group of States provided for in agreements                                 establishing, or leading to the establishment of, economic partnership agreements.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 580 

To amend chapter 35 of title 28, United States Code, to provide for a 

120-day limit to the term of a United States attorney appointed on 

an interim basis by the Attorney General, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 19, 2007 

Mr. BERMAN (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, and Mr. SCOTT of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 35 of title 28, United States Code, to 

provide for a 120-day limit to the term of a United 

States attorney appointed on an interim basis by the 

Attorney General, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INTERIM APPOINTMENT OF UNITED STATES 

4 ATTORNEYS. 

5 Section 546 of title 28, United States Code, is 

6 amended by striking subsection (c) and inserting the fol7 lowing new subsections: 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 580 IH

1 ‘‘(c) A person appointed as United States attorney 

2 under this section may serve until the earlier of— 

3 ‘‘(1) the qualification of a United States attor4 ney for such district appointed by the President 

5 under section 541 of this title; or 

6 ‘‘(2) the expiration of 120 days after appoint7 ment by the Attorney General under this section. 

8 ‘‘(d) If an appointment expires under subsection 

9 (c)(2), the district court for such district may appoint a 

10 United States attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled. 

11 The order of appointment by the court shall be filed with 

12 the clerk of the court.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
BIO-MEDICAL v. NCDHHS.

No. 549A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 25, 2006.

Lee M. Whitman, Raleigh, Sarah M. Johnson, Winston-Salem, for Bio-Medical Applications.

Thomas West, for Total Renal Care.

Matt Woodward, Assistant Attorney General, for NCDHHS.

S. Todd Hemphill, Raleigh, for Health Systems Management.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 634 S.E.2d 572.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of October 2006 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 25th day of October 2006."
Exhibit 99

OMTOOL, LTD.8A Industrial Way
Salem, New Hampshire 03079

March
22, 2002

Securities
and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0408

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

Pursuant
to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Omtool, Ltd. has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") stating
that the audit of the consolidated financial statements of Omtool, Ltd. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2001 was subject to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance
with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation. Availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to this audit.



---
EXHIBIT 23.1








                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
Form S-3 (No.  333-70369)  of Prime Group Realty  Trust and in the  Registration
Statement  Form S-8  (No.333-65147)  pertaining  to the Prime Group Realty Trust
Share  Incentive  Plan of our report dated March 24,  1999,  with respect to the
consolidated  financial  statements of Prime Group Realty Trust  included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

     Our audits also  included the financial  statement  schedule of Prime Group
Realty Trust listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the  responsibility  of the
Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion, based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered  in  relation  to the basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 29, 1999
In the Matter of P.A.K. (a minor child). appealed by Mother.

No. 274P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Janet K. Ledbetter, Hillsborough, for Tanika Johnson.

Carolyn J. Yancey, for Vance County DSS.

Carolina S. Burnette, Attorney Advocate, for Guardian ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent on the 19th day of May 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
# Council Decision of 19 November 2013 appointing one member of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency (2013/682/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 19 November 2013

# appointing one member of the Management Board of the European Chemicals Agency

# (2013/682/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning                           the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency(1), and in particular Article 79 thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Article 79 of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 provides that the Council is to appoint as members of the Management Board of the                              European Chemicals Agency (‘the Management Board’) one representative from each Member State.

(2)By its Decision of 17 May 2011(2), the Council appointed 15 members of the Management Board.

(3)The Romanian Government has informed the Council of its intention to replace the Romanian representative on the Management                              Board and has submitted a nomination for a new representative, who should be appointed for a period which runs until 31 May                              2015,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Ms Liliana Luminița TÎRCHILĂ, of Romanian nationality, born on 1 February 1960, shall be appointed member of the Management                     Board of the European Chemicals Agency in place of Mr Ionuț GEORGESCU for the period from 19 November 2013 to 31 May 2015.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 19 November 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

L. Linkevičius                            

1

OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.                           

2

OJ C 151, 21.5.2011, p. 1.
IN RE H.P.

No. COA06-70.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Greene (03JA32).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Omtool, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Voelk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



|/s/ROBERT L. VOELKRobert L. Voelk Chief Executive OfficerMarch 22,
2004 |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3141 

To provide for nondiscrimination by eligible lenders in the Federal Family 

Education Loan Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2008 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself and Mr. DODD) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide for nondiscrimination by eligible lenders in the 

Federal Family Education Loan Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Student 

5 Loan Discrimination Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NONDISCRIMINATION. 

7 Section 438(e) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

8 (20 U.S.C. 1087–1(e)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘In order’’ and inserting the fol10 lowing: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•S 3141 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In order’’; and 

2 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(2) FEDERAL FAMILY EDUCATION LOAN PRO4 GRAM.—In order for an eligible lender to receive a 

5 special allowance payment under this section on any 

6 loan made, insured, or guaranteed under this part, 

7 the eligible lender shall not engage in any pattern or 

8 practice that results in a denial by such eligible lend9 er of an otherwise eligible borrower’s access to a 

10 loan under this part because of the borrower’s race, 

11 sex, color, religion, national origin, age, disability 

12 status, income, attendance at a particular institution 

13 of higher education that participates in a loan pro14 gram under this part, education program length, or 

15 academic year in school.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 429/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 429/2013 of 8 May 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 429/2013                     

# of 8 May 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 May 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

DAVID HARLAN LAVERS, Appellant, vs. AMAZON, INC.; AMAZON.COM , INC.; AMAZON.COM

SERVICES, LLC; AMAZON.COM

NV INVESTMENT HOLDINGS, LLC; AND TRIPLE K TRAILER COURT, INC., Res ondents. No. 83180



# FILED MAR 1 5 2022 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to add party and reopen discovery and granting a motion to strike request for trial de novo. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Nadia Krall, Judge. On September 23, 2021, this court issued a notice directing appellant to file the docketing statement by October 14, 2021, a transcript request form by October 7, 2021, and an opening brief or informal brief for pro se parties on or before January 21, 2022. When appellant failed to file the docketing statement or a transcript request form, this court issued an order on December 21, 2021, directing appellant to file the docketing statement and a transcript request form within 7 days. The order cautioned appellant that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned. To date, appellant has failed to file those documents or to otherwise communicate with this court. Additionally, appellant has failed

- 0 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
0) 1947Ato file the opening brief or informal brief. Accordingly, this court concludes

that appellant has abandoned this appeal and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.



## *1 / 4 1L6/4,e/3 , J. Silver
, J. Cadish Pickering 

# e iek2A (A ) 

# J.

cc: Hon. Nadia Krall, District Judge David Harlan Lavers Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas Kravitz Schnitzer Johnson Watson & Zeppenfeld, Chtd. Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(CH 1Q-47A 4M. , 2
STATE v. ALSTON.

No. COA06-475.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Nash (04CRS51790).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







Certification
      of CFO




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of KH Funding Company (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William M. Baker,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:
                October 3, 2007
            /s/
                William M. BakerWilliam
                M. BakerChief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.




This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
      by
      such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to
      the
      extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
STATE v. WILLIAMS.

No. COA06-1541.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Wake (04CRS84879, 04CRS103205).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Cornelius PRATT.

No. 315P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Cornelius Pratt, Pro Se.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, John Snyder, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 14th day of June 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*18"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."

Justice HUDSON recused.
NOTICE OF ACCELERATED APPEAL AND AUTOMATIC STAY OF TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS 

Page 1 of 2

CAUSE NO. 15-02186-367

TAYLOR RICE § IN THE DISTRICT COURT 

 § 

Plaintiff, § 

v. § OF DENTON COUNTY, TEXAS 

 § 

THE CITY OF KRUM, TEXAS, § 

 § 

Defendant. § 367th JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

NOTICE OF ACCELERATED APPEAL AND AUTOMATIC STAY OF TRIAL COURT 

PROCEEDINGS 

To the Honorable Judge of this Court: 

Under Rule 28 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, appellant City of Krum, the 

defendant in the above action, files this notice of accelerated appeal to the Second 

Court of Appeals, Fort Worth, Texas. 

Appellant desires to appeal from an interlocutory order entered in the above-styled and 

numbered case by this court on October 14, 2015. Specifically, appellant is a 

governmental unit appealing the court’s denial of the relief requested within Defendant’s 

Plea to the Jurisdiction, Plea in Abatement, and Supporting Brief (filed August 17, 

2015). 

Under Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 51.014(b), this interlocutory appeal of a 

denial of a plea to the jurisdiction made by a governmental entity stays all proceedings 

in the trial court, including but not limited to trial proceedings, pending resolution of the 

appeal. 

This appeal is accelerated under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 28.1(a)-(b) and 

Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 51.014(a)(8). 

Date: October 30, 2015. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/David Overcash 

Clark McCoy 

State Bar No. 90001803 

cmccoy@wtmlaw.net

David Overcash 

State Bar No. 24075516 

david.overcash@wtmlaw.net

2591 Dallas Parkway, Suite 205 

FILED: 10/30/2015 5:03:25 PM

SHERRI ADELSTEIN

Denton County District Clerk

By: Elizabeth Jones, Deputy

ACCEPTED

02-15-00342-CV

SECOND COURT OF APPEALS

FORT WORTH, TEXAS

11/16/2015 12:25:53 PM

DEBRA SPISAK

CLERK

 FILED IN 2nd COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 11/16/2015 12:25:53 PM DEBRA SPISAK Clerk
NOTICE OF ACCELERATED APPEAL AND AUTOMATIC STAY OF TRIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS

Page 2 of 2

Frisco, Texas 75034

972.712.3530 telephone

972.712.3540 facsimile

Lance Vanzant

Texas Bar No. 24009746

lvanzant@hbwvlaw.com

Jeffrey A. Hines

Texas Bar No. 09693000

jhines@hbwvlaw.com

512 W. Hickory, Suite 100

P.O. Box 50149

Denton, Texas 76206

940-387-3518 – Tel.

866-546-9247 – Fax 

ATTORNEYS FOR CITY OF KRUM, TEXAS

SERVICE CERTIFICATE

A true and correct copy of this document was electronically served on 

October 30, 2015, at approximately the same date and time as this 

document was electronically filed, via the methods listed below:

VIA ELECTRONIC FILING AND 

U.S. CERTIFIED MAIL RRR

#7012 2920 0000 4194 4526

Richard Gladden

1200 W. University Dr, Suite 100

Denton, Texas 76201

Phone: (940) 323-9300

Facsimile: (940) 539-0093

___________________________

David Overcash