alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Marie T. FORMYDUVAL, as Administratrix of the Estate of Hartwell B. Formyduval, and Joey Formyduval v. William S. BRITT, individually and d/b/a Britt & Britt; and Britt & Britt, PLLC.

No. 357A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2007.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 630 S.E.2d 192 (2006), reversing an order of dismissal entered 3 November 2003 by Judge B. Craig Ellis in Superior Court, Columbus County, and remanding for further proceedings. Heard in the Supreme Court 9 January 2007.

The Odom Firm, PLLC, by Thomas L. Odom, Jr. and T. LaFontine Odom, Sr., Charlotte, and Williamson & Walton, LLP, by Benton H. Walton, III, Whiteville, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Mitchell Brewer Richardson, by Ronnie M. Mitchell and Coy E. Brewer, Jr., Fayetteville, for defendants-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. *See State v. Harrison,*360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); *Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co.,*356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); *Robinson v. Byrd,*356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f o ll owi n g o r

der :

A1 7 A2 03 2 . REI S et a l. v

. OOI DA RI SK RETENTI ON GROUP, I NC.

Pl ai n t i ffs Can d i ce Rei s an d M el v i n W il l iam s (co l l e c t i v el y “ Pl ai n t iffs ”) fi l ed

a d i rect act i o n ag ai n s t OOIDA Ri s k Ret en t i o n Gro u p , In c. (“ OOIDA”) fo r i n ju ri e s

s t em m i n g fro m an au t o m o b i le acci d en t. OOIDA m o ved fo r s u m m ary ju d g m en t , in
p a r t , bas ed u p o n fed eral p reem p t i o n

. Th e t ri al co u rt ag reed an d fo un d t h at t h e Li ab i l i t y Ri s k Ret en t io n Act , 1 5 U. S. C. § 39 0 1 , et s eq ., p reem p t ed Pl ai n t i ffs ’ d i rect
act i on ag ai n s t OOIDA. Rei s ap p eal s fro m t h at ru l i n g

.

Th e Su p rem e Co u rt h as d et erm in ed th at p reem p t i o n cas es i n v o k e i t s

co n st i t u t io n al q u es t i o n ju ri s d i ct i o n

. See Ba b i es R ig h t S ta r t , In c. v. Ga

. Dep t. o

f Pu b. Hea lt h , 2 9 3 G a. 5 53 , 5 5 4 (1 ) (7 4 8 SE2 d 4 0 4 ) (2 0 1 3 ); W a r d v. McFa l l , 2 7 7 Ga. 6 4 9, 6 5 1 (1 ) (5 9 3 SE2 d 3 4 0 ) (2 0 0 4 ). Acco rd i n g l y , t h i s ap p eal is h ereb y TRANSFERRED
t o t he Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s po s i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. November 13, 2017

11/13/2017
EXHIBIT 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Minco Gold Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.




Date: March 27, 2015


/s/ Ken Z. CaiKen Z. Cai, President
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VII, L.P., (the Partnership) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General
Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 25, 2008

|                                                                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                  
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                            
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and
will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1265/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1265/2013 of 4 December 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in NAFO area            3LN by vessels flying the flag of Portugal         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1265/2013                     

# of 4 December 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in NAFO area 3LN by vessels flying the flag of Portugal

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
KUNZE v. KUNZE.

No. COA05-1244.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Cabarrus (01CVD2466)

Case without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, James R. Tolonen, certify that:
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June30, 2004 of Business Objects S.A.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.     Date: August 9, 2004 By: /s/ James R. Tolonen      James R. Tolonen   Chief Financial Officer and Senior Group Vice President
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Margaret A. Dowling, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 870]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 6, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, who was employed as a secretary from November 2001 until August 2003, quit her job to complete the requirements for her Master’s degree in education. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant now appeals.

Substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left employment without good cause because her work schedule interfered with her school schedule. It is well settled that leaving employment in order to attend school does not constitute good cause for leaving employment *(see Matter of Adorisio [Commissioner of Labor],*18 AD3d 942 [2005]; *Matter of Jones [Commissioner of Labor],*9 AD3d 777 [2004]). Nor did the Board abuse its discretion in denying claimant’s request for approval of her internship as vocational training pursuant to Labor Law § 599 *(see Matter of Dawkins [Hudacs],*187 AD2d 805 [1992], *appeal and lv dismissed*81 NY2d 989 [1993]; *Matter of Weiss [Levine],*50 AD2d 977 [1975]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Wayne Thomas JOHNSON v. CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT Alamance County and Prosecutor.

No. 119P00-15.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Wayne Thomas Johnson, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by on the 7th day of February 2007 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Alamance County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 8th day of March 2007."
In re C.D.A.W.

No. 110A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2006.

Gary C. Rhodes, Salisbury, for Angela Wright Eagle.

*568Joyce Torres, Attorney Advocate, for Guardian Ad Litem.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of August 2006 by Petitioner for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Petitioner (Guilford County DSS) shall have up to and including 30 days from the date the petition for discretionary review is ruled upon to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of August 2006."
# Death of Abe Shinzo

The longest serving Prime Minister in Japan's history, Abe Shinzo was a proud servant of the Japanese people and a faithful friend to the United States. He worked with American Presidents of both parties to deepen the Alliance between our nations and advance a common vision for a free and open Indo-Pacific. Even in the moment he was attacked and killed, he was engaged in the work of democracy, to which he dedicated his life.

As a mark of respect for the memory of Abe Shinzo, former Prime Minister of Japan, by the authority vested in me as President of the United States by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby order that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, July 10, 2022. I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of time at all United States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-two, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-seventh.

[FR Doc. 2022-15135

Billing code 3395-F2-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mooney Aerospace Group, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  March 30, 2004               By:  /s/ J. Nelson Happy
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          J. Nelson Happy
                                          Vice Chairman, President &
                                          Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
                                          (Principal Executive Financial and
                                          Accounting Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-13917, 333-14509, and 333-18851) pertaining to The Sabre
Group Holdings, Inc. 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan, 1996 Directors Stock
Incentive Plan, and Employee Stock Purchase Plan, respectively, of our
report dated January 18, 1999, except for Note 14, as to which the date is 
March 16, 1999, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The 
Sabre Group Holdings, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the 
year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 18, 1999
STATE v. GILBERT.

No. COA05-962.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Gaston (04CRS26173. 04CRS70285, 04CRS70540)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
TILLMAN v. COMMERCIAL CREDIT.

No. 360A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 12, 2006.

G. Christopher Olson, Raleigh, for Tillman and Richardson.

Jeffrey M. Young, Research Triangle Park, Christopher J. Willis, Richard H. Sinkfield, Atlanta, GA, for Commercial Credit, et al.

Carlene McNulty, Mallam J. Maynard, F. Paul Bland, Jr., Washington, DC, for NC Justice Center, et al.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Wendy I. Sexton, Raleigh, Alan S. Kaplinsky, Jeremy T. Rosenblum, Philadelphia, PA, Robert E. McKew, General Counsel and SVP, Washington, DC, for American Financial Ser., et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of December 2006 by Plaintiffs for Leave to File Reply Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of December 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Dewerren Liewase TITUS.

No. 321P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

C. Scott Holmes, Durham, for Dewerren L. Titus.

*198Marc X. Sneed, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th day of June 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.3


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-67929) of LNR Property Corporation and in the related Prospectus, in
the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-70965) pertaining to the LNR
Property Corporation Savings Plan, (Form S-8 No. 333-56734) pertaining to the
LNR Property Corporation 2000 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan and (Form
S-8 No. 333-58160) pertaining to the LNR Property Corporation 2001 Senior
Officers Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated January 8, 2002, with respect
to the financial statements of Madison Square Company LLC, included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of LNR Property Corporation for the year ended
November 30, 2001 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Ernst & Young LLP

Miami, Florida
February 27, 2002
STATE v. MONTGOMERY

No. COA06-956

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CRS222035, 05CRS222036, 05CRS222037, 05CRS222040, 05CRS222041).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5656 

To repeal a requirement with respect to the procurement and acquisition 

of alternative fuels. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2008 

Mr. HENSARLING (for himself and Mr. CONAWAY) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

A BILL 

To repeal a requirement with respect to the procurement 

and acquisition of alternative fuels. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL. 

4 Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security 

5 Act of 2007 (42 U.S.C. 17142) is repealed. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP. v. PRINCE.

No. COA06-104.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Lee (00CVS1079).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
IN RE K.F.

No. COA06-906.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Sampson (05J01, 05J02, 05J03, 05J04, 05J05).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed.