alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CORNELL HESTER

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 65, 2021

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 1002002758 ( N )

§

§

§

Submitted: March 23, 2021

Decided: April 13 , 2021

ORDER

On March 2, 2021 , the appellant, Cornell Hester filed a notice of appeal from

a Superior Court order, docketed on January 21, 2021 , denying his motion for public

emergency health credits under New Jersey Senate Bill 2519

. A timely notice of

appeal should have been filed on or before February 22, 2021

. 1 On March 5, 2021

,

the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Hester to show cause wh y the appeal

should not be dismissed as untimely. On March 15 , 2021, the Court received the

certified mail receipt indicating that the notice to show cause had b een delivered on

March 12, 2021 . A timely response to the notice to show cause was due by March

1 Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(iv) (providing that postconviction appeals must be filed within thirty days after

entry of the judgment or order upon the docket ); Supr. Ct. R. 11(a) (providing that the last day of

the computed time period does not include Saturday or Sunday ).2

22, 2021 . To date, Hester has not responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal

of this appeal is therefore deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERE D that under Supreme Court Rules

3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED

.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

____________
No. 22

- 40190

____________ Randall T. Greenough,

Plaintiff

— Appellant ,

versus

Sharilla Gray,

Defendant

— Appellee

.

______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 9:21

- CV

- 75

______________________________
Before Wiener , Elrod , and Engelhardt , Circuit Judges

. Per Curiam : *
Our prior panel opinion , Greenough v. Gray , No. 22

- 40190, 2023 WL 2573923 (5th Cir. Mar. 30, 2023), is WITHDRAWN. The following opinion is SUBSTITUTED : Randall T. Greenough, an inmate confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for default judgment.

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir

. R

. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 25, 2023
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40190 Document: 00516763569 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/25/2023No. 22

- 40190

2 I t is not clear that the district court’s order denying default judgment is appealable at this time because it is not clear that Greenough’s case has progressed to final judg ment. See Adult Film Ass’n of America, Inc. v. Thetford , 776 F.2d 113, 115 (5th Cir. 1985) (holding that orders denying default judgment are not subject to interlocutory appeal) . While the district court issued an order adopting the magistrate judge’s re port and recommendation dismissing Greenough’s claims on March 23, 2022, the magistrate judge extended Greenough’s time to file objections to the report and recommendation on March 25, 2022, explaining that “the plaintiff did not have an opportunity to fil e objections” due to mailing delays. Those objections have now been filed, and the district court has not ruled on them.
Because it is not clear, from the record, whether Greenough’s case remains pending, we remand to the district court to clarify whethe r a final judgment has been issued. Upon doing that, the district court shall return the case to this court for further proceedings, or dismissal, as may be appropriate.

LIMITED REMAND. Case: 22-40190 Document: 00516763569 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/25/2023
**Exhibit
      32**







**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND
      CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





Carol
      K.
      Nelson, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Lars H. Johnson, Chief
      Financial Officer of Cascade Financial Corporation (the "Corporation"), each
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
                Form 10-Q/A of the Corporation for the quarterly period ended March
                31,
                2006 (the "Form 10-Q/A"), fully complies with requirements of Section
                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
                78m or
                78o(d)); and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
                material
                respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
                Corporation.





This
      certification is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is
      not
      being filed as part of this quarterly report.








Date:
      June 15, 2006








/s/
      Carol K. Nelson


Carol
      K.
      Nelson, President and CEO








/s/
      Lars H. Johnson


Lars
      H.
      Johnson, Chief Financial Officer
II 

Calendar No. 1002 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3096 

To amend the National Cave and Karst Research Institute Act of 1998 

to authorize appropriations for the National Cave and Karst Research 

Institute. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2008 

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself and Mr. DOMENICI) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the National Cave and Karst Research Institute 

Act of 1998 to authorize appropriations for the National 

Cave and Karst Research Institute. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•S 3096 RS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

2 THE NATIONAL CAVE AND KARST RESEARCH 

3 INSTITUTE. 

4 The National Cave and Karst Research Institute Act 

5 of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 4310 note; Public Law 105–325) is 

6 amended by striking section 5 and inserting the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

8 ‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

9 as are necessary to carry out this Act.’’. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
Calendar No. 1002 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3096 

A BILL 

To amend the National Cave and Karst Research 

tute. for the National Cave and Karst Research InstiInstitute Act of 1998 to authorize appropriations 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2008 

Reported without amendment 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN ITS REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE  SIX MONTH  PERIOD  ENDED  JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000929299
<NAME>                        ISOLYSER COMPANY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               7,923<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       17,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,036
<INVENTORY>                                         27,311
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    83,694
<PP&E>                                              37,617
<DEPRECIATION>                                      18,667
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     133,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               14,754
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                40
<OTHER-SE>                                          76,043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       133,206
<SALES>                                             80,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    80,104
<CGS>                                               60,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       60,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    27,978
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (10,381)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           166
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (10,547)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (10,547)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.26)
<FN>
<F1> INCLUDES CASH EQUIVALENTS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# L_2013260DE.01000501.xml

| 2.10.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 260/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 260/5

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 212/2013 der Kommission vom 11. März 2013 zur Ersetzung des Anhangs I der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 396/2005 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich Ergänzungen und Änderungen der Einträge zu den Erzeugnissen, für die dieser Anhang gilt

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 68 vom 12. März 2013
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 68 vom 12. März 2013

Auf Seite 38, im Anhang, Code-Nummer 0231020:

anstatt:

„Tomaten“

muss es heißen:

„Paprika“;

auf Seite 38, im Anhang, Code-Nummer 0232010:

anstatt:

„Cucumbers“

muss es heißen:

„Schlangengurken“;

auf Seite 38, im Anhang, Code-Nummer 0232020:

anstatt:

„Gherkins“

muss es heißen:

„Gewürzgurken“;

auf Seite 38, im Anhang, Code-Nummer 0232030:

anstatt:

„Courgettes“

muss es heißen:

„Zucchini“;

auf Seite 52, im Anhang, Code-Nummer 1030000, Ziffer iii) Vogeleier:

anstatt:

| „1030010 | Huhn |
| --- | --- |
| 1030020 | Ente |
| | Gans“ |

„1030010

Huhn

1030020

Ente

Gans“

muss es heißen:

| „1030010 | Huhn |
| --- | --- |
| 1030020 | Ente |
| 1030030 | Gans“. |

„1030010

Huhn

1030020

Ente

1030030

Gans“.

---
IN RE M.C.

No. COA06-886

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from New Hanover (05J529).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6931

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

NOLAN ALSTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (3:06-cv-00242-CMC; 3:01-cr-01024-CMC)

Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 31, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nolan Alston, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Nolan Alston seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Alston has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE v. BOWMAN.

No. COA05-1262.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from McDowell (02CRS53620).

Case without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            ELINE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

                          SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
                1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Form 10-KSB of Eline Entertainment Group, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Barry A. Rothman, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date:  February 16, 2005


         /s/ BARRY A. ROTHMAN
         ____________________________________________
         Barry A. Rothman
         Chief Executive and Financial Officer




A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, OR OTHER
DOCUMENT AUTHENTICATING, ACKNOWLEDGING, OR OTHERWISE ADOPTING THE SIGNATURE THAT
APPEARS IN TYPED FORM WITHIN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY SECTION 906, HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO ACCUIMAGE DIAGNOSTICS CORP. AND
WILL BE RETAINED BY ACCUIMAGE DIAGNOSTICS CORP. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
GERSCH v. FANTASIA.

No. COA06-741.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Wake (06CVD1121).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3082 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1700 Cleveland Avenue in Kansas City, Missouri, as the ‘‘Reverend Earl Abel Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•S 3082 ES

1 SECTION 1. REVEREND EARL ABEL POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1700 Cleveland Avenue in Kan5 sas City, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Reverend Earl Abel Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Reverend Earl Abel 

11 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the Senate June 27, 2008. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3082 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostAbel Post Office Building’’. Kansas City, Missouri, as the ‘‘Reverend Earl al Service located at 1700 Cleveland Avenue in
Exhibit 32.1


I, Gregory  Cuneo,  do hereby  certify in  accordance  with 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.  The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-Q  of  DualStar  Technologies
     Corporation  (the "Company") for the period ending  September 30, 2004 (the
     "Quarterly  Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or 78o(d))
     and

          2. The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company.

                                             DUALSTAR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
                                             (Registrant)

                                            By:/s/ GREGORY CUNEO
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                   Gregory Cuneo
                                             Chief Executive Officer


Dated: February 4, 2005
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Matthew L. Tomao, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 328]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 26, 2004, which dismissed claimant’s appeal from a decision of an Administrative Law Judge as untimely.

Following various hearings in connection with claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits, an Administrative Law Judge (hereinafter ALJ) ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. This decision was mailed to claimant on February 10, 2004. Claimant sent a letter to the Department of Labor appealing this decision, which was postmarked March 17, 2004. A telephone conference hearing was subsequently held on the timeliness of claimant’s appeal. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board dismissed the appeal as untimely, concluding that claimant did not file it within 20 days of the mailing of the ALJ’s decision. Claimant now appeals from this decision.

We affirm. Claimant offered no reasonable excuse for his failure to appeal the ALJ’s decision within 20 days of mailing as required by Labor Law § 621 (1) *(see Matter of Plotnik [Commissioner of Labor],*13 AD3d 700, 701 [2004]; *Matter of Grunkorn [Commissioner of Labor],*6 AD3d 913, 913 [2004]). The contentions in claimant’s brief fail to address the timeliness of his appeal. Accordingly, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

*639Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1209/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1209/2013 of 25 November 2013 approving non-minor amendments to the specification            for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Camembert de            Normandie (PDO)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1209/2013                     

# of 25 November 2013

# approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin                        and protected geographical indications [Camembert de Normandie (PDO)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined France’s                              application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected designation of origin ‘Camembert de Normandie’,                              registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 1107/96(2).

(2)Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission                              published the amendment application in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments                              should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The amendments to the specification published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.3.****Cheeses**U.K.

#### FRANCEU.K.

Camembert de Normandie (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 148, 21.6.1996, p. 1.                           

3

OJ C 140, 18.5.2013, p. 20.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0325

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA RICHARD LARSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 30, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 21 2022

11/21/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0325