alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000929454
<NAME>                        GLENBOROUGH REALTY TRUST INCORPORATED
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.000
<CASH>                          846
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   4,460
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                5,306
<PP&E>                          1,717,717
<DEPRECIATION>                  125,136
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,743,242
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           13,862
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     11
<COMMON>                        30
<OTHER-SE>                      756,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,743,242
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                64,165
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   21,557
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                17,744
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              16,347
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 8,517
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             8,517
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 (466)
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    8,051
<EPS-BASIC>                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.08



</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 23, 2021 

No. 04-21-00386-CV

Greg ABBOTT, in his official capacity as Governor of Texas, 

Appellant 

v.

CITY OF LAREDO and United Independent School District,

Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 2021-CVK-001517-D1

Honorable Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding 

ORDER

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Appellees, City of Laredo and United Independent School District, have filed an 

emergency motion asking this court to exercise its authority under Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 29.3 to maintain the trial court’s temporary injunction in effect pending the disposition 

of this accelerated interlocutory appeal.

We grant the motion and reinstate the trial court’s September 8, 2021 Temporary 

Injunction Order pending final disposition of this appeal. 

It is so ORDERED on September 23, 2021. 

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________ 

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed October 25, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-0093

Lower Tribunal No. F19-17802

________________

James Sthubin,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina M. 

Miranda, Judge.

Jarlens B. Princilis, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and SCALES and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Shearod, 992 So. 2d 900, 903 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)

(“The existence of contradictory, conflicting testimony or evidence ‘does not 
2

warrant a judgment of acquittal because the weight of the evidence and the 

witnesses' credibility are questions solely for the jury.’”) (quoting Fitzpatrick

v. State, 900 So. 2d 495, 508 (Fla. 2005)).
##### 



Exhibit 31 (a)
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants fourth fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
    /s/ Richard H. Smith
 34
Order entered April 5 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00212 - CR No. 05 - 20 - 00213 - CR JAILEN LATRELL MATTHEWS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F18 - 76633 - M & F 18 - 76635 - M

O RDER Before the Court is the State’s motion for extension of time to file its brief

. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER the brief received on March 31, 2021, filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification 
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Dan R. Lee, Chairman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Microtek Medical Holdings, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

This
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the Form
10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in this Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|November 9, 2004 | /s/ Dan R. Lee                                            
|---------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                 | Dan R. Lee
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SEC FORM
10-Q/A AMENDMENT NO. 1 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-25-1998             MAR-19-1997
<CASH>                                         128,665                  84,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,172                  68,583
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,709                   4,075
<INVENTORY>                                     16,415                  14,171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               218,154                 194,350
<PP&E>                                         998,571                 953,923
<DEPRECIATION>                                 307,634                 283,768
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,051,333                 991,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          235,465                 214,203
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           902                     902
<OTHER-SE>                                     386,052                 310,950
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,051,333                 991,019
<SALES>                                         47,752                  45,040
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,848                 157,086
<CGS>                                           44,401                  42,521
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  166,945                 157,143
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   837                     907
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,495                   7,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (97)                 (3,734)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       294                     959
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (662)                 (4,693)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                  25,146
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (662)                  20,453
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)                    0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)                    0.24
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,335
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,047
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,647
<PP&E>                                         212,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                 105,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 820,708
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,511
<BONDS>                                        570,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   820,708
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,581
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   251
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,335)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,335)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,335)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.52)
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Montrez Demario CARTER.

No. 290A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 15, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 629 S.E.2d 332 (2006), reversing defendant's conviction which resulted in a judgment entered 25 August 2004 by Judge Kenneth C. Titus in Superior Court, Durham County, and ordering a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court 21 November 2006.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, and Derrick C. Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

George E. Kelly, III, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying periodic report of Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Andrew Batinovich, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: February 27, 2006 |  | /s/ Andrew Batinovich                
|                        |  | Andrew Batinovich                    
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|                        |  | Glenborough Realty Trust Incorporated
MILLS v. STEELCASE, INC.

No. COA06-803.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 20, 2007.

Certification Date April 9, 2007.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #47860).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18 -6 74 V

Filed: April 30, 2019

UNPUBLISHED

PAULA ROSSELET

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;
Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Tetanus Diphtheria acellular Pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine; Measles Mumps Rubella (MMR) Vaccine; ; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

Paul R. Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA , for petitioner.
Daniel Anthony Principato, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for
respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Dorsey

, Chief Special Master:

On May 11, 2018

, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. , 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration (“SIRVA”) following receipt of influenza ( “ flu ” ), tetanus, diphtheria acellular pertussis ( “ Tdap ” ) and measles mumps and rubella ( “ MMR ” ) vaccinations on January 23, 2017 . Petit ion at 1 . The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 The undersigned intends to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website. This

means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, undersigned is required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in

accordance with the E

- Government Act of 200 2. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services).

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

.On April 29, 2019

, respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in whic h he concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, respondent concludes that petitioner’s medical course is consistent with a SIRVA as defined by the Vaccine Injury Table Id. at 3 . Respondent further agrees that petitioner has satisfied all legal prerequisites for compensation under the

Vaccine Act

. Id. at 3-4.

In view of respondent’s position and the evidence of record, the undersigned find s that petitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey
Nora Beth Dorsey
Chief Special Master
# L_2019317EN.01011401.xml

| 9.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 317/114 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 317/114

---

Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2016/798 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on railway safety

(Official Journal of the European Union L 138 of 26 May 2016)

On page 145, Annex III, second paragraph, point 11, third indent:

for:

| ‘— | that maintenance tasks are performed in accordance with the maintenance orders and to issue the notice to return to operation that includes eventual restrictions of use;’, |
| --- | --- |

‘—

that maintenance tasks are performed in accordance with the maintenance orders and to issue the notice to return to operation that includes eventual restrictions of use;’,

read:

| ‘— | that maintenance tasks are performed in accordance with the maintenance orders and to issue the notice to return to operation including possible restrictions on use;’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

that maintenance tasks are performed in accordance with the maintenance orders and to issue the notice to return to operation including possible restrictions on use;’.

---
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Minco Mining & Metals Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|   |                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                      
|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.







Date:

July 5, 2006





Mark Orsmond

Mark Orsmond

Chief Financial Officer
# ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

July 12, 2024 CR-2023-0472Samuel Earl Hunter v. State of Alabama (Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court: CC21-1770) 

## NOTICE You are hereby notified that on July 12, 2024, the following action was taken in the above-referenced cause by the Court of Criminal Appeals: Application for Rehearing Overruled.

D. Scott Mitchell, Clerk
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, R. Greg Smith, certify to the best of my knowledge based upon a review of the
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ERF Wireless, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-K"), that the Form 10-K fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and that information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ERF
Wireless, Inc. for the periods covered by the Form 10-K.



Dated: November 1, 2005           By: /s/ R. Greg Smith
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      R. Greg Smith, Chief Executive Officer and
                                      Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. OVERBY

No. COA06-384

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Randolph (05CRS51523).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# L_2012075EN.01000301.xml

| 15.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 75/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 75/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 218/2012

of 13 March 2012

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Béa du Roussillon (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France's application to register the name ‘Béa du Roussillon’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, France's application to register the name ‘Béa du Roussillon’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 March 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 193, 2.7.2011, p. 22.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

FRANCE

Béa du Roussillon (PDO)

---