alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



I, Robert J. Birnbach, Chief Financial Officer of DualStar Technologies
Corporation (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending
          March 31, 2004 (the "Quarterly Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and

     2.   The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

                                             DUALSTAR TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
                                            (Registrant)

                                            By:/s/ ROBERT BIRNBACH
                                               -------------------
                                                  Robert Birnbach
                                            Chief Financial Officer


         Dated:   May 14, 2004
STATE v. BRYANT.

No. COA06-1023.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 7, 2007.

Certification Date August 27, 2007.

Appeal from Edgecombe (04CRS54377).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6773

JAMES EUGENE VENABLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. M. JABE, Warden; J. A. SMITH, JR., Regional Director; P. A. TERRANGI, Deputy Warden; W. S. COPELAND; C. TILLERY, Counselor; DR. MARSHALL; MR. LORD; K. HAMLIN, Nurse; G. L. BASS, Deputy Warden, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-841) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Eugene Venable, Appellant Pro Se. Lance Bradford Leggitt, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia;David Ernest Boelzner, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing several of the many Defendants from this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction onlyover final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We deny Appellant's motion for general relief and dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<CIK>                      000929540
<NAME>                     SELKIRK COGEN PARTNERS, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000

<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                        Jun-30-1999
<CASH>                              6900
<SECURITIES>                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                       15014
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         4996
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    27740
<PP&E>                              371512
<DEPRECIATION>                      68440
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      370239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               18743
<BONDS>                             378112
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            0
<OTHER-SE>                          (49845)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        370239
<SALES>                             83287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    83287
<CGS>                               54887
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       54887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    2218
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  15983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     10199
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 10199
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        10199
<EPS-BASIC>                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 20, 2022

NO. 03

- 22

- 00162

- CV

Donald Ray McCray , Appellant

v.

Lee Glass , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND TR IANA

DISMISSED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment s igned by the tr i a l court on September 30, 202 1 . Having

reviewed the record, the Court find s that the appeal shoul d b e dismissed . Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal

. Because a ppellant is indigent and cannot afford to pay costs, no

a d judicat ion of costs is made.
BRASWELL v. ST. PAUL MERCURY INS. CO.

No. COA06-157.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Wayne (04CVS1363).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed and remanded.
<PAGE>




                                   Exhibit 11


                        PAULA FINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED                NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                               SEPTEMBER 30,                    SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                                           2000             1999            2000            1999
                                                                        ---------        ---------       ---------        ----------
<S>                                                                     <C>              <C>             <C>              <C>
Net income (loss)                                                       $  (1,378)       $   2,116       $  (2,932)       $    4,240
                                                                        =========        =========       =========        ==========

Weighted average shares outstanding for calculating
      basic earnings per share                                          5,392,509        5,833,625       5,519,891         5,895,139

Options                                                                      --              2,959            --               4,860
                                                                        ---------        ---------       ---------        ----------
Total shares for calculating diluted earnings
      per share                                                         5,392,509        5,836,584       5,519,891         5,899,999
                                                                        =========        =========       =========        ==========

Basic earnings (loss) per share                                         $   (0.26)       $    0.36       $   (0.53)       $     0.72
                                                                        =========        =========       =========        ==========

Diluted earnings (loss) per share                                       $   (0.26)       $    0.36       $   (0.53)       $     0.72
                                                                        =========        =========       =========        ==========
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               13,710
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           281
<ALLOWANCES>                                             46
<INVENTORY>                                             206
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     14,286
<PP&E>                                                  337
<DEPRECIATION>                                          192
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       14,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   691
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 61
<OTHER-SE>                                           13,581
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         14,451
<SALES>                                               1,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      1,225
<CGS>                                                   820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      288
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (2,696)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (2,696)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       (224)
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (2,920)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0


</TABLE>
## Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Amy Nicole Fitzgerald , Appellant

No. 06

- 24

- 00048

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No.

2229472 ). Panel cons ists of Chief Justice

Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin.

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief

Justice Stevens

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the motion of the appellant to

dismiss the appeal should be granted. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Amy Nicole Fitzgerald , has adequately indicated h er inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED APRIL 3 , 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
# 09-73955 Jinhu Zhao v. Eric Holder, Jr. 

O'SCANNLAIN, THOMAS and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges

null

2014

810.0683

eng - iTunPGAP0��

eng - iTunNORM 00000101 00000000 0000254B 00000000 0001AA87 00000000 00005208 00000000 0002F46D 00000000�

eng - iTunSMPB 00000000 00000210 000005F0 0000000001108000 00000000 00316D10 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000�
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1994-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,899
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  62,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               64,799
<PP&E>                                         4,009,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,761,129)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,313,422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          398,057
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     915,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,313,422
<SALES>                                        54,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               54,522
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  35,415<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,411
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,411
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,411
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.4 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES  OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, I, J.
Tracy Mey, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Selkirk Funding
Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:  (1)
    
    such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation. August 12, 2004
    
    /s/ J. TRACY MEYJ. Tracy MeyController and Chief Accounting OfficerSelkirk Cogen Funding Corporation
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Selkirk Cogen Funding Corporation and will be retained by Selkirk
Cogen Funding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
# The Feed (Hygiene and Enforcement) and the Animal Feed (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)

        - Previous
        - Next

N.I.

Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland

# 2013 No. 294

Food

# The Feed (Hygiene and Enforcement) and the Animal Feed (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2013 (revoked)F1

Made

12th December 2013

Coming into operation

12th January 2014

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

F1Regulations revoked (14.2.2016) by The Animal Feed (Hygiene, Sampling etc. and Enforcement) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016 (S.R. 2016/5), reg. 1, **Sch. 5**
S. 3241 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1717 Orange 

Avenue in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the ‘‘CeeCee Ross Lyles Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CEECEE ROSS LYLES POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1717 Orange Avenue in Fort Pierce, Florida, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘CeeCee Ross Lyles Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘CeeCee Ross Lyles Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# L_2013074EN.01001901.xml

| 16.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 74/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 74/19

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 236/2013

of 15 March 2013

fixing the amount of private storage aid for certain fishery products in the 2013 fishing year

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2813/2000 of 21 December 2000 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 as regards the grant of private storage aid for certain fishery products (2), and in particular Article 1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Private storage aid should not exceed the sum of technical and financial costs recorded in the Union during the fishing year preceding the year in question. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Private storage aid should not exceed the sum of technical and financial costs recorded in the Union during the fishing year preceding the year in question.

| (2) | To discourage long-term storage, to shorten payment times and to reduce the burden of controls, private storage aid should be paid in one single instalment. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

To discourage long-term storage, to shorten payment times and to reduce the burden of controls, private storage aid should be paid in one single instalment.

| (3) | In order not to hinder the operation of the intervention system in the year 2013, this Regulation should apply retroactively from 1 January 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In order not to hinder the operation of the intervention system in the year 2013, this Regulation should apply retroactively from 1 January 2013.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Committee established by Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Committee established by Regulation (EC) No 104/2000,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2013 fishing year the amount of private storage aid, referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, for the products listed in Annex II to that Regulation shall be as follows:

| — | first month: EUR 224 per tonne; |
| --- | --- |

—

first month: EUR 224 per tonne;

| — | second month: EUR 0 per tonne. |
| --- | --- |

—

second month: EUR 0 per tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2013.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 March 2013.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 326, 22.12.2000, p. 30.

2

---
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 938/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 938/2013 of 30 September 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 938/2013                     

# of 30 September 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. Randy Lee SELLARS.

No. 547P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2006.

Hilda Burnett-Baker, Assistant Attorney General, Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Jarvis John Edgerton, IV, for Randy Lee Sellars.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of May 2006 by Defendant to Dismiss With Prejudice Pursuant to N.C.G.S. 15A-1443(a)(b)(c) and N.C.G.S. 15A-954(a)(I)(4)(7):

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of December 2006."