alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-14-00081-CR

BRIAN WILLIAMS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11F0303-5

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brian Williams has filed several notices of appeal in connection with his pro se filings of 

pretrial habeas applications with the trial court. The trial is now complete, with his plea of guilty 

pursuant to a plea agreement. On May 16, we sent a letter to Williams in connection with his 

attempted appeals, stating that there was no order or judgment appearing in the records from 

which an appeal could be taken, requesting that he show this Court how we could have 

jurisdiction over his appeals, and warning him that in the absence of some such showing, his 

appeals would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P 25.2(a).

Williams has filed a response in which he claims that the court denied his pretrial habeas 

applications on April 21, 2014. We have again reviewed the record and find no such order. 

Further, we have contacted the district clerk, who has informed us that no such order exists. 

We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: June 4, 2014

Date Decided: June 5, 2014

Do Not Publish
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 138/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 138/2013 of 18 February 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 138/2013                     

# of 18 February 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 February 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 14-1273

___________________________ Mark Smith lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v. Larry Norris, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as former Director of the Arkansas Department of Corrections; Ray Hobbs, in his individual and official capacity as current Dir ector of the Arkansas Department of Corrections; Dale Reed, in his individua l capacity and as Warden of Ouachita River Correctional Unit; John Doe, 1-5 are unknown individuals or entities who had supervisory authority for the protecti on and safety protocol for inmate work details; 6-10 are unknown individuals or entities who had the direct responsibility for the daily safety protocol and assignments lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________ Submitted: November 4, 2014 Filed: November 17, 2014 [Unpublished]

____________ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Mark Smith appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment and dismissal of his action. After careful review, seeJoseph v. Allen , 712 F.3d 1222, 1225 (8th Cir. 2013) (grant of summary j udgment is reviewed de novo and is proper when, viewing evidence in favor of nonmoving party, there is no genuine issue of material fact), we affirm for the reas ons stated by the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Brian S. M iller, Chief Judge, United St ates District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. -2-
# L_2013238DE.01002301.xml

| 6.9.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 238/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 238/23

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 313/2013 der Kommission vom 4. April 2013 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1126/2008 zur Übernahme bestimmter internationaler Rechnungslegungsstandards gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1606/2002 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates im Hinblick auf Konzernabschlüsse, Gemeinsame Vereinbarungen und Angaben zu Anteilen an anderen Unternehmen: Übergangsleitlinien (Änderungen an IFRS 10, IFRS 11 und IFRS 12)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 95 vom 5. April 2013
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 95 vom 5. April 2013

Auf Seite 16, im Anhang unter der Überschrift „Änderung an IFRS 12 — Angaben zu Anteilen an anderen Unternehmen“, Paragraph C2A:

anstatt:

„Ein Unternehmen muss die Angabepflichten dieses IFRS auf keine Berichtsperiode anwenden, die der Erstanwendung von IFRS 12 unmittelbar vorausgeht.“

muss es heißen:

„Ein Unternehmen muss die Angabepflichten dieses IFRS nicht auf Berichtsperioden anwenden, die vor der Vergleichsperiode jener Berichtsperiode liegen, auf die IFRS 12 erstmalig angewandt wird.“

---
STATE v. BROADWAY.

No. COA05-1651.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 15, 2006.

Certification Date September 5, 2006.

Appeal from Craven (04CRS2329, 04CRS2330).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in appeal. Remand for correction of clerical error.
STATE v. MOSES

No. COA06-356.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 5, 2007.

Certification Date June 25, 2007.

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS63971, 04CRS28531, 04CRS28532, 03CRS19610).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                     EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION SUMMARY

2005 base salaries for executive officers:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
       NAME                                          TITLE                                             BASE SALARY
-------------------     ----------------------------------------------------------------               -----------
<S>                     <C>                                                                            <C>
Patrick J. Balthrop     Chief Executive Officer and President                                            $400,000

Harriss T. Currie       Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Office and Treasurer                 $228,800

Randel S. Marfin        Vice President, Luminex Bioscience Group                                         $225,500

James W. Jacobson       Vice President, Research and Development                                         $225,500

Oliver H. Meek          Vice President, Manufacturing                                                    $192,850

David S. Reiter         Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary                          $214,200

Gregory J. Gosch        Vice President, Marketing and Sales                                              $187,775

Russell W. Bradley      Vice President, Business Development and Strategic Planning                      $185,000
</TABLE>

The executive officers also participate in a cash bonus plan and receive
long-term incentive awards pursuant to the Company's shareholder approved equity
incentive plans.

                             ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The foregoing information is summary in nature. Additional information regarding
executive officer compensation can be found in the Company's proxy statement
filed in connection with the 2005 annual meeting of shareholders.
WALKER v. WALKER.

No. COA05-995.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Iredell, (01CVD2612).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         213,859
<SECURITIES>                                   355,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                312006
<PP&E>                                       1,409,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                 138,943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,614,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,437,607
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1996
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,614,132
<SALES>                                        313,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               402,090
<CGS>                                           58,052
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,052
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,196,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               941,031
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              78,890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (931,239)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARK STEVEN GRIBBIN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-1572

[February 29, 2024]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Daliah H. Weiss, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2020-CF005907-AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alexandra A. Folley, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,723
<SECURITIES>                                       721
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,126
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,179
<INVENTORY>                                     66,893
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               119,782
<PP&E>                                          58,911
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,608
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 198,926
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,395
<BONDS>                                         96,018
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,484
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,375
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   198,926
<SALES>                                         56,221
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,221
<CGS>                                           32,210
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   571
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,835)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,358
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,477)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,477)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)


</TABLE>
STATE v. FINNEY.

No. COA05-850-2.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 3, 2007.

Certification Date July 23, 2007.

Appeal from the Buncombe (01CRS7899).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3166 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 960
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3166

    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to impose criminal 
    penalties on individuals who assist aliens who have engaged in 
   genocide, torture, or extrajudicial killings to enter the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2008

  Mr. Sessions (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Coburn, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. 
Specter, and Mr. Cardin) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

                           September 12, 2008

                Reported by Mr. Leahy, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to impose criminal 
    penalties on individuals who assist aliens who have engaged in 
   genocide, torture, or extrajudicial killings to enter the United 
                                States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AIDING OR ASSISTING CERTAIN ALIENS TO ENTER THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    Section 277 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1327) 
is amended by striking ``(other than subparagraph (E) thereof)''.
                                                       Calendar No. 960

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3166

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to impose criminal 
    penalties on individuals who assist aliens who have engaged in 
   genocide, torture, or extrajudicial killings to enter the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 12, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
STATE v. Emory S. REDFEAR.

No. 50P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2007.

Chris Z. Sinha, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of February 2007 by Defendant for Leave to Amend:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of March 2007."
----

**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 I, John E. Salamon; Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of Salamon Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do hereby certify  pursuant to Rule 15d-l4(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that: 

|   | (1)    | the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form        10-QSB/A of the Registrant for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”),        to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the        requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act        of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations        of the Registrant.                                                                                                                                                                        |

| Dated: January 16, 2007 | By:    | */s/ John E. Salamon*   |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                    |   | John E. Salamon         |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer |

----
II 

Calendar No. 44 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 57 

[Report No. 110–19] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 18, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

FEBRUARY 15, 2007 

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment 

A BILL 

To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, 

pertaining to the Virgin Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS PERTAINING TO 

4 THE VIRGIN ISLANDS. 

5 (a) REPEAL.—Sections 1 through 6 of the Act of May 

6 26, 1936 (Chapter 450; 49 Stat. 1372–1373; 48 U.S.C. 

7 1401–1401e) are repealed. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 57 RS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall be deemed 

2 to have taken effect on July 22, 1954. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

Calendar No. 44 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 57 

[Report No. 110

–19] 

A BILL 

To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 

1936, pertaining to the Virgin Islands. 

FEBRUARY 15, 2007 

Reported without amendment 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
CABARRUS COUNTY, Plaintiff v. SYSTEL BUSINESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff v. Frank M. Clifton, Jr., Third-Party Defendant.

No. 51P07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2007.

E. Fitzgerald Parnell, III, Raleigh, Cynthia L. Van Horne, Charlotte, for Systel Business Equipment.

*207Fletcher L. Hartsell, Jr., Concord, for Cabarrus County.

Christy E. Wilhelm, for Clifton.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of January 2007 by Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2007."

BRADY, J., recused.
O'Marr S. REID v. JULIUS BLUM, INC.

No. 170P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Renee Hughes, Charlotte, for Julius Blum, Inc.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the written notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 28th day of *490March 2006, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 28th day of March 2006 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 3rd day of April 2006 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."