alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Jeremy Dushane MURRELL.

No. 484A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 28, 2006.

Jennifer Martin, Assistant District Attorney, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of December 2006 by Defendant for Extension of time to Serve Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 5th day of January 2007 to serve his/her proposed record upon the district attorney. The parties shall then proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12. By order of the Court in conference this the 28th day of December 2006."
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







Certification
      of CFO




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of KH Funding Company (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James E. Parker,
      Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:
                August 14, 2006
            /s/
                James E. ParkerJames
                E. ParkerChief
                Financial Officer and Treasurer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.




This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
      by
      such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to
      the
      extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
STATE v. HONEA

No. COA06-1118

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed May 1, 2007

Certification Date May 21, 2007

Appeal from Lee (05CRS50737).

Case reported without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roy Wolvin, CFO of Nymox
Pharmaceutical Corporation, do hereby certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the information
contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 of Nymox
Pharmaceutical Corporation and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations on Nymox Pharmaceutical
Corporation

Date: June 30, 2006

| | /s/
Roy WolvinRoy WolvinChief
Financial OfficerNymox Pharmaceutical Corporation
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Leno, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 207]

Appeal from a judgment of the Ontario County Court (James R. Harvey, J.), rendered March 8, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting *1400him upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (§ 220.39 [1]). The contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel is not reviewable on direct appeal to the extent that it concerns matters outside the record on appeal *(see People v Joyner,*19 AD3d 1129 [2005]; *see generally*CPL 440.10 [1] [f]). Defendant’s contention otherwise does not survive the guilty plea because [t]here is no showing that the plea bargaining process was infected by any allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of his attorney[’s] allegedly poor performance” *(People v Burke,*256 AD2d 1244, 1244 [1998], *lv denied*93 NY2d 851 [1999]; *see Joyner,*19 AD3d at 1130; *People v La Bar,*16 AD3d 1084, 1085). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.
No. 95-3856

 

Brooklyn Park Economic * Appeal from the United States

Development Authority, * District Court for the

 * District of Minnesota.

 Appellee, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

v. *

 *

Kenneth S. Engel, *

 *

Appellant. *

 

Submitted: July 11, 1996

 Filed: August 12, 1996

 

Before FAGG, LAY, and HEANEY, Circuit Judges.

 

PER CURIAM.

Engel appeals from a final decision by the district court affirming

the bankruptcy court's ruling that the debt he owed to the Brooklyn Park

Economic Development Authority ("the City") was nondischargeable under the

Bankruptcy Code. After a trial, the bankruptcy court issued detailed

factual findings and concluded that Engel had obtained a $350,000 loan from

the City by deception, including failure to disclose a material fact, and

that the City established all the elements of fraud under 11 U.S.C.

§ 523(a)(2)(A). The district court, bound by the bankruptcy court's

findings of fact unless they were clearly erroneous, Matter of Van Horne,

823 F.2d 1285, 1287 (8th Cir. 1987) (citation
2

omitted), affirmed the decision. The lower courts' findings of fact are

also binding on this court unless clearly erroneous. Id. 

Pursuant to 8th Cir. R. 47B, we affirm the decision of the district

court upholding the bankruptcy court's ruling that the debt owed by Engel

was not dischargeable in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A).

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
STATE v. DESPERADOS, INC. and Perez.

No. 629A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 22, 2006.

Jeffrey S. Miller, for Desperados & Perez.

Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 638 S.E.2d 4.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of December 2006 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of December 2006."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 408/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 408/2013 of 2 May 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 408/2013                     

# of 2 May 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 May 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 313 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 313

                   For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 17, 2007

   Mr. Levin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR IBRAHIM PARLAK.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Ibrahim 
Parlak shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Ibrahim Parlak enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Ibrahim 
Parlak shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully in the 
United States and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as 
of the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees not later than 2 years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or lawful permanent resident status to Ibrahim Parlak, 
the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 
1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
                                 <all>
```
Dennis E. YARRELL v. BEAUFORT COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT.

No. 254P03-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Dennis E. Yarrell, Pro Se.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, for Beaufort Superior Court.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 8th day of January 2007 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2007."
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 171/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 171/2013 of 26 February 2013 amending Annexes I and IX, replacing Annex VIII to Directive 2007/46/EC            of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers,            and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive), and amending Annexes            I and XII to Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 implementing and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European            Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial            vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 171/2013                     

# of 26 February 2013

# amending Annexes I and IX, replacing Annex VIII to Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing                        a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units                        intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive), and amending Annexes I and XII to Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008                        implementing and amending Regulation (EC) No 715/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council on type-approval of motor                        vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and on access to vehicle                        repair and maintenance information                     

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Regulation (EU) No 195/2013 of 7 March 2013 amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the                                 Council and Commission Regulation (EC) No 692/2008 as concerns innovative technologies for reducing CO 2 emissions from light                                 passenger and commercial vehicles Text with EEA relevance.
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Capital Beverage Corporation (the " Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Carmine N. Stella, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 11, 2008
|----------------------



|/s/ Carmine N. Stella
Name: Carmine N. StellaTitle: Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Capital Beverage Corporation (the " Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Carol Russell, hereby certify in my capacity as Treasurer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 11, 2008
|----------------------



|/s/ Carol Russell
Name: Carol RussellTitle: Treasurer
|-----------------------------------------------------



---
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 176/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 176/2013 of 27 February 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 176/2013                     

# of 27 February 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 February 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
**Exhibit 11**

 

**PAULAFINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**Computationof Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share**

(Inthousands, except per share data)

 
| ** **                                                                    | ** ** | **Three Months Ended** | ** ** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                                    | ** ** | **March 31,**          | ** ** |
| ** **                                                                    | ** ** | **2005**               | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** |
|                                                                          |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Net income                                                                    |       | $                      | 661        |   | $ | 558 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Weighted average shares outstanding for calculating basic earnings  per share |       | 6,592,750              |       | 6,305,152 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Options                                                                       |       | 238,102                |       | 305,764 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Total shares for calculating diluted earnings per share                       |       | 6,830,852              |       | 6,610,916 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Basic earnings per share                                                      |       | $                      | 0.10       |   | $ | 0.09 |   |
|                                                                          |       |                   |       |   |   |
| Diluted earnings per share                                                    |       | $                      | 0.10       |   | $ | 0.08 |   |

 

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth William ROBERSON.

No. 707P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 3, 2007.

Winifred H. Dillon, Raleigh, for Dillon.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 641 S.E.2d 347.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of April 2007 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2007."