alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John J. Dee, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Paragon Real Estate Equity and
Investment Trust, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Paragon Real Estate Equity and
Investment Trust (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the Registrant and we have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the Registrants board of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 6, 2005 By:
    
    
    
    /s/ John J. DeeJohn J. Dee
Chief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OEPRATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,899
<SECURITIES>                                        23
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,183
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,516
<INVENTORY>                                     19,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,991
<PP&E>                                          30,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,971
<SALES>                                        190,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,413
<CGS>                                          131,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  131,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,615
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,352
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,264
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (194)
<CHANGES>                                        (360)
<NET-INCOME>                                       710
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                       FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT

The First Amendment to Lease Agreement is made and entered into to be effective
as of this 1st day of June, 2005, by and between 620 PLATT ROAD, LLC, a Michigan
limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as ("Landlord") and RUGGED
LINER, INC., f/k/a THE COLONEL'S TRUCK ACCESSORIES, INC., a Michigan
corporation, hereinafter referred to as "(Tenant").

BACKGROUND

A.    Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease Agreement dated January 1, 2000
      demising certain real property and improvements, more particularly
      described therein located at 951 Aiken Road, Owosso, Michigan (the
      "Premises").

B.    Tenant desires to extend the term of the Lease until May 31, 2020.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledge by each party hereto to
the other, Landlord and Tenant hereby amend and modify the Lease as follows:

      1.    Extension of Term. The term of the Lease, as set forth in ARTICLE I,
            Section 1.02 will continue and will now expire May 31, 2020, upon
            all of the terms, covenants and conditions in the Lease.

All other terms, covenants and conditions of the Lease not specifically amended
or modified or ratified are confirmed by both parties in all respects.

Executed the 16th day of May, 2005 and to be effective the day and date above
written.

LANDLORD:                                TENANT:

620 Platt Road, LLC, a Michigan          Rugged Liner, Inc., f/k/a The Colonel's
limited liability company                Truck Accessories, Inc., a Michigan
                                         corporation

By: ________________________             By: __________________________
    Donald J. Williamson                     Gregory T. Strzynski
Its: Member                              Its: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-13917, 333-14509, 333-18851, 333-51291, 333-40932, 333-48114, 333-86376 and 333-102738)
pertaining to The Sabre Group Holdings, Inc. 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan, 1996 Directors Stock Incentive Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Deferred Compensation Plan; Sabre Holdings
Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 2000 Stock Option Plan; GetThere.com, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and 1999 Stock Incentive Plan; Travelocity.com LP Second Amended 1999 Long-Term
Incentive Plan, Travelocity Holdings, Inc. Amended 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan, Travelocity.com LP Employee Stock Purchase Plan and Travelocity Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase
Plan and Sabre Holdings Corporation 2003 Directors Deferred Compensation and Deferred Stock Unit Plan, respectively; and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No 333-99209) of our
report dated January 13, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Sabre Holdings Corporation included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2002.

|                             |  | ERNST & YOUNG LLP
|---------------------------- |  | -----------------
|DALLAS, TEXAS
MARCH 17, 2003 |  |                  

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent certified public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K into the previously filed
Registration Statements of the Company on Form S-3 File No. 333-37789, Form S-4
File No. 333-28951, Form S-4 File No. 333-23135, Form S-3 File No. 333-53099,
Form S-3 File No 333-72611, Form S-8 File No. 333-22689 and Form S-8 File No.
333-41341.



ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
  September 28, 1999.
STATE v. DENNIS.

No. COA06-840.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Craven (05CRS52657, 05CRS52658).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
Walter Lee RAMSEY, Jr., Employee v. SOUTHERN INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTORS INCORPORATED, Employer Reliance Insurance Company, Carrier and Gallagher Basset Services, Incorporated, Third-Party Administrator.

No. 485P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2006.

W. Scott Fuller, Meredith T. Black, Raleigh, for Southern Industrial, et al.

Douglas B. Johnson, New Bern, for Ramsey.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 630 S.E.2d 681.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of September 2006 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of December 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Rodney Jay TUCKER.

No. 113P03-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Russell J. Hollers, III, Durham, for Rodney J. Tucker.

E. Clementine Peterson, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 29th day of September 2005 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Forsyth County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 3rd day of November 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition for Writ of Prohibition filed by Defendant on the 29th day of September 2005 in this matter, the following order was entered and is:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999             JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-19-1998             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999             MAY-18-1998
<CASH>                                           6,602                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,263                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     31,477                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,386                       0
<PP&E>                                          56,664                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,763                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 489,789                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,677                       0
<BONDS>                                        224,473                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           167                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     184,813                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   489,789                       0
<SALES>                                        636,507                 249,052
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               639,191                 250,596
<CGS>                                          481,205                 190,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  481,205                 190,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               132,436                  51,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,156                   6,371
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,394                   2,082
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,505                     890
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,889                   1,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,889                   1,192
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   176.67                   35.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   176.67                   35.76
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Monster
Worldwide, Inc.
New York, New York

We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference, in the previously filed open Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-81843, 333-63631,
333-50699, 333-18937, and 333-131899) of Monster Worldwide, Inc., of our reports dated February 11, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial
statements and the effectiveness of Monster Worldwide, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2007.

| |  | /s/BDO SEIDMAN, LLPBDO Seidman, LLP
| |  | -----------------------------------

New York, New York
February 15, 2008

---
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publi cation in the New Mexico Reports. Please see 1 Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please 2 also note that this electronic memorandum opinion ma y contain computer-generated errors or other 3 deviations from the official paper version file d by the Court of Appeals and does not include the 4 filing date. 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 HOWARD FELDMAN, 7 Plaintiff-Appellant, 8

v. NO. 30,148 9 MARCUS SCHANDELWEIN and 10 EXECUTIVE AUTOMOTIVE, 11 Defendants-Appellees. 12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANTA FE COUNTY 13 Daniel A. Sanchez, District Judge 14 Howard A. Feldman 15 Santa Fe, NM 16 Pro Se Appellant 17 Rudy Martin 18 Espanola, NM 19 for Appellees 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION 21 FRY, Chief Judge. 22 Summary reversal was proposed for the reasons stated in the calendar notice. 23 No memorandum opposing summary reversal has been filed, and the time for doing 242 so has expired. This case is remanded fo r further proceedings consistent with our 1 calendar notice. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1

2 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge 3 WE CONCUR: 4

5 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge 6

7 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge 8
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT


TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of ERF Wireless, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007, (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




April 1,
2008









/s/ H. Dean
      Cubley
              Dr.
      H. Dean Cubley
              Chief
      Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          29,602
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               992,427
<PP&E>                                      20,377,577
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,519,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,850,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          863,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,372
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,172,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,850,667
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               779,190
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  540,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             318,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (79,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (79,838)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (79,838)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
Addendum



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 CURAGEN CORPORATION 
 BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION POLICY (ADDENDUM) 
 (Effective March 30, 2005) 
  
 CASH COMPENSATION – Ad Hoc Committee Fees 
  

	 	•	 	On March 30, 2005, the Board of Directors adopted a compensation policy for all ad hoc Committees which are formed pursuant to Article III, Section 1 of the By-Laws of the Company.
A Committee’s cash compensation will be as follows: the Chairman will receive $20,000 and the members will receive $10,000 each. 

  

 1 of 1
## IN THE COUR T OF CRIMINA L APPEALS OF TEX AS
N o. P D - 1816- 07

JO H N N Y R A Y A BB O TT , A ppe l l ant

v . THE S TA TE OF TE X AS ON THE S TATE ’ S PET I TI ON FOR DI S CRETI ON ARY REVI EW

FROM THE TENTH CO URT O F AP PEALS

ELLI S CO UNTY

H OL C OM B , J. , f

i l e d a c onc ur r i ng o pi ni on.
Ijoin the opinion of the Court. I write separ ately , howeve r, to e mphasize that, had appe llant timel y a pp e a le d f ro m th e tr ia l c ourt ’s Au g us t 16 , 2 00 7, jud g me nt p la c inghim on c omm un ity
su pe rv isi on , h e wou ld hav e ha d a va lid c la im a g a ins t th e tr ia l c ourt ’s de c isi on to r e qu ir e , a s a condition of community

supervision, that he ser

ve 180 day s in jail without receivingtime cre dit for the 74 0 d ay s h e ha d a lr e a dy sp e nt i n p ri so n a

wa iti ngthe outc ome of

his a pp e a l. A c on dit ion

of c omm un ity su pe rv isi on , to be va lid , must have a re a so na ble re latio ns hip to the re habilitation of t he accuse d, the compensation of the victim, or the protec tion of the public. SeeAbbott-2

Tam e z v . S tate , 5 34 S.W. 2d 68 6, 69 1 ( Te x.Cr im. Ap p. 19 76 ). I n li g ht o f t he ve ry le ng thy po stjud g me nt i nc arc e ratio n e nd ur e d b y a pp e lla nt i n th is c a se , it wa s unr e a so na ble fo r the tr ia l court

to requir e h i m t o serve an additional 18 0 d ay s in

ja il a s a c on dit ion

of c omm un ity su pe rv isi on . It is inc on c e iva

ble tha t su c h f ur the r i nc arcerat ion

wo uld have ha d a

ny re a so na ble re latio ns hip to appellant’ s reha

bilitation or to t he prote ction of the public. In addition, the United States Supreme Court ha s held that the F ifth Amendment protec tion
a g a ins t do ub le je op ard

y is vio late d wh e ne ve r punis hme nt a lr e a dy e nd ur e d f or an o ff e ns e is n ot f

ull y subtracte d from any new punishment imposed. North C arolina v. Pierce , 395 U.S. 711, 718 (1969). In my view, that cr editing pr inciple applies with equa l force to the probation condition in question
– r e a lly , a ne w ty pe of punis hme nt –

imp os e d f

or the sa me c on vic tio n a ft e r a

pp e a l. Finally , Iag ree with the court of appe als that “de nial of time cre dit [ in a situation like the one here ] would have the effec t of penaliz ing a defendant [ for] prosec uting his appea l, and a de fenda nt should not have to ‘start over’” once he is corre ctly sentenc ed. Ab bo tt v . S

tate , 245 S.W .3d 19, 22 (T ex . Ap p . –W ac o 2 0 0 7 ) ( qu o t i n g W ats on v . S tate , 942 S.W .2d 723 (Tex.App.–Houston [14t h Dist.] 1997, no pet.).

DEL I VERED SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 PUB L I SH
STATE v. ALEXANDER

No. COA06-625

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed April 17, 2007

Certification Date May 7, 2007

Appeal from Mecklenburg (03CRS254286).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN RE L.A.P.

No. COA06-244.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Surry (02J35A).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.