alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Advanced Optics  Electronics,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Leslie
Robins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                           /s/ Leslie Robins
                                           -----------------
                                           Leslie Robins
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           April 6, 2006


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 4.15      CONSENT OF DAVID VACHON   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 29, 2012 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, David Vachon, participated, as an independent Qualified Person (as such term is defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101  Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), in the preparation of a technical report entitled Technical Report and Recommendations, 2011 Geological Exploration Program, Anatacau Property, Quebec completed in February 2012 (the Report) concerning mineralized material in the Anatacau property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings Item III  Description of the Business  3.4.4 Geological Setting ; 3.4.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.4.6 Mineralization in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 29, 2012 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,    /s/  David VachonName:  David Vachon, P.Geo.      May 14, 2012
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 106/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 106/2013 of 4 February 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 106/2013                     

# of 4 February 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 February 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
EVERSON v. WRIGHT.

No. 146P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

David K. Everson, Pro Se.

Douglas E. Wright, Pro Se.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of April 2006 by Plaintiff for Rehearing En Banc:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2006."
PRINTING SERVICES v. AM. CAPITAL GROUP.

No. 599A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 10, 2007.

Lynanne B. Wescott, for American Capital Group, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of January *8052007 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff shall have up to and including the 23rd day of February 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of January 2007."
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00829-CV

John Rady, Appellant

v.

Elizabeth Boulton; Sand Canyon Corporation; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee for

Option One Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-3, Asset Backed Certificates, Series 2006-3; and

American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-11-003424, HONORABLE ORLINDA NARANJO, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On August 6, 2013, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to appellant John Rady that

his brief was due on July 15, 2013, and was overdue, and that if he failed to file a brief, this Court

would dismiss his appeal for want of prosecution. The Clerk also notified Rady that his appeal

would be dismissed for want of prosecution if he did not respond to this Court by August 16, 2013. 

To date, Rady has not responded to this Court’s notice and has not filed a brief. Accordingly, we

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).
__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose, and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 29, 2013

2
Motion Granted; Order filed March 5 , 2013.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14 - 12 - 01015 - CV NO. 14 - 12 - 01044 - CV

____________ CHARLES KENNEBREW, S R. and ELITE PROTECTIVE SER VICES, LLC , Appellant s / Cross - Appellees V. MICHAEL R. HARRI S , Appellee / Cross - Appellant On Appeal from the 125th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010 - 09593



### ORDER Defendants Charles Kennebrew, Sr. and Elite Protective Services, LLC filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment signe d by the court below on August 9, 2012. The appeal was assigned to this court and docketed under our appellate case number 14

- 12

- 01015

- CV. Plaintiff Michael R. Harris filed a notice of cross

- appeal from the same judgment. The cross

- appeal was assigned to t his court and docketed under our appellate case number 14

- 12

- 01044

- CV.2

On February 28, 2013, Michael Harris filed an unopposed motion to consolidate the appeals. We GRANT the motion and issue the following order. We ORDER the appeal and cross

- appeal, Nos . 14

- 12

- 01015

- CV and 14

- 12

- 01044

- CV, CONSOLIDATED. A ll documents should be filed in case number 14

- 12

- 010 15

- CV, and they will be deemed filed in both case s . The briefing deadlines shall be set as follows: 1. Charles Kennebrew, Sr. and Elite Protective Ser vices, LLC shall file their appellants ’ brief of up to 15,000 words on or before April 4 , 2013 , subject to any extension of time that may be granted; 2. Michael R. Harris shall filed his combined brief of appellee/cross

appellant of up to 15,000 words 30 days thereafter, subject to any extension of time that may be granted; 3. Charles Kennebrew, Sr. and Elite Protective Services, LLC shall file their combined reply/ cross - appellees’ brief of up to 15,000 words, 30 days thereafter, subject to any extension of time that may be granted; 4. Michael R. Harris shall file any cross

- appellant ’ s reply brief of up to 7,500 words 20 days thereafter, subject to any extension of time that may be granted. PER CURIAM
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 547/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 547/2013 of 14 June 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 547/2013                     

# of 14 June 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 June 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 324/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 324/2013 of 9 April 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 324/2013                     

# of 9 April 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 April 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE of North Carolina v. Edward Louis BETHEA.

No. 362P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina, Sixteen-A District.

March 8, 2007.

Edward Louis Bethea, Pro Se.

Gary A. Scarzafava, Assistant Attorney General, Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 6th day of July 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*360"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2007."
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Virginia Smith, Appellant

No. 06-15-00021-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 102nd District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 13F 

1078-102). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, Virginia Smith, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MARCH 17, 2015

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
STATE of North Carolina v. David Eugene MITCHELL, Jr.

No. 41P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

C. Scott Holmes, Durham, for David E. Mitchell, Jr.

David Kirkman, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of January 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          20,980
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  408,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    290,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               720,103
<PP&E>                                       1,832,669
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,554,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          964,018
<BONDS>                                        155,166
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    149,203
<COMMON>                                     8,440,527
<OTHER-SE>                                  (7,154,636)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,554,278
<SALES>                                        293,980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               293,980
<CGS>                                          229,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  229,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,917,367
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             624,852
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,752,120)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (3,752,120)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (3,752,120)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
blyq_ex101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
 
FORM OF
 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF DEBT CANCELLATION
 
[__] ("Moran") and BALLY CORP., a Nevada corporation (the "Company") hereby acknowledge and agree that Moran has loaned the Company the sum of $[__] as such amount appears in the Company's Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016 (the "Moran Loan"). Moran and the Company hereby further acknowledge and agree that the Moran Loan and the debt represented by such loan is hereby cancelled in all respects and such cancellation shall be deemed a contribution to the Capital of the Company by Moran. 
 
The Moran Loan represents the total amount due to Moran by the Company and there are no other loans or amounts due to Moran by the Company.
 
Confirmed and agreed to as of June _____, 2016.
 
______________________________
[__]
 
BALLY CORP.
    	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Katiuska Moran	
	 
	Katiuska Moran
Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. Timothy STONE.

No. 505A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 30, 2006.

William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of November 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Stone) shall have up to and including the 14th day of December 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of November 2006."
# Council Decision 2013/72/CFSPShow full title

Council Decision 2013/72/CFSP of 31 January 2013 amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against            certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision 2013/72/CFSP                     

# of 31 January 2013

# amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the                        situation in Tunisia                     

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

(1)On 31 January 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/72/CFSP(1).

(2)The restrictive measures set out in Decision 2011/72/CFSP apply until 31 January 2013. On the basis of a review of that Decision,                              the restrictive measures should be extended until 31 January 2014.

(3)Decision 2011/72/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP is hereby replaced by the following:

# ‘Article 5

This Decision shall apply until 31 January 2014. It shall be kept under constant review. It may be renewed or amended, as                        appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

C. Ashton                            

1

OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.