alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            89,027
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       3,524
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 102,947
<CASH>                                           8,832
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                  98
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,056
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,559
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 68,334
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             14,705
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                            4,022
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 12,029
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           23,663
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,559
<PREMIUMS>                                      65,195
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              3,850
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 173
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   3,136
<BENEFITS>                                      44,498
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     22,374
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                               745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,739
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,174
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,565
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,565
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.83
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                  49,293
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             45,097
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                (603)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                              12,176
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                19,921
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                 61,690
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Todd M. Raba, President of MidAmerican Energy Company (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 
 
 
 
 Dated: November 4, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Todd M. Raba
 Todd M. Raba
 President
 (chief executive officer)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 134 (Thursday, July 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42143]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15087]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-8-2022]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 43--Battle Creek, Michigan; 
Authorization of Production Activity; Pfizer, Inc. (Lipid Active 
Pharmaceutical Ingredients); Kalamazoo, Michigan

    On March 11, 2022, Pfizer, Inc. submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
Subzone 43E, in Kalamazoo, Michigan.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (87 FR 15911, March 21, 2022). On July 
11, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that 
no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: July 11, 2022.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-15087 Filed 7-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant To
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Prime Group Realty Trust (the "Company")
on form  10-K  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2003 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
J. Nardi, Chairman of the Board of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section.  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  aspects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations of the
Company.



/s/ Stephen J. Nardi
--------------------




Stephen J. Nardi
Chairman of the Board
March 9, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-17-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,969
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,389 <F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         589,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 741,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          189,355 <F2>
<BONDS>                                        328,044
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         20
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                     223,919
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   741,468
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,830
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,358 <F3>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    792
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       792
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04
<FN>
<F1> Amount includes net deferred costs ($28,472) and
     other assets ($10,917).
<F2> Amount includes accrued interest payable
     ($1,245), accrued real estate taxes ($17,915),
     accounts payable and accrued expenses ($13,903),
     liabilities for leases assumed ($5,758),
     dividends declared ($2,505), other liabilities
     ($822) and minority interest of ($147,207).
<F3> Amount includes property operations ($2,213), real
     estate taxes ($1,765), depreciation and
     amortization ($2,478), general and administrative
     expenses ($267) and minority interest allocation
     of ($635).
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, James R. Tolonen, certify that:
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March31, 2004 of Business Objects S.A.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.     Date: May 4, 2004 By: /s/ James R. Tolonen      James R. Tolonen   Chief Financial Officer and   Senior Group Vice President
BIO-MEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Plaintiff v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, DIVISION OF FACILITY SERVICES, and North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Facility Services, Medical Facilities Planning Section, Defendants, and Total Renal Care of North Carolina, LLC and Health Systems Management, Inc., Defendant-Intervenors.

No. 549A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 9, 2007.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 634 S.E.2d 572 (2006), affirming an order entered 16 November 2004 by Judge Henry W. Hight, Jr. in Superior Court, Wake County, dismissing plaintiff's complaint and granting summary judgment for defendants and defendant-intervenors. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 February 2007.

Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton, LLP, by K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Amy Y. Bason, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellees.

Poyner & Spruill, LLP, by Thomas R. West, Pamela A. Scott, and Chad W. Essick, for Total Renal Care of North Carolina, LLC; and Bode, Call & Stroupe, LLP, by S. Todd Hemphill and Diana E. Ricketts, Raleigh, for Health Systems Management, Inc., defendant-intervenor-appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) issued a semi-annual dialysis report indicating a need for additional dialysis service stations in Wake County. Bio-Medical Applications of North Carolina, Inc. (Bio-Medical) brought an action in Wake County Superior Court challenging the data on which the semi-annual report was based and requesting a declaratory judgment, as well as preliminary and permanent injunctions and a writ of mandamus. DHHS and defendant-intervenors moved for dismissal, and a Superior Court judge dismissed the action and granted summary judgment in their favor.

Bio-Medical appealed to the North Carolina Court of Appeals. While the appeal was pending, DHHS issued a Certificate of Need to defendant-intervenor Total Renal Care of North Carolina, LLC (Total Renal Care) to construct ten new dialysis service centers in Wake County. Bio-Medical contested the Certificate of Need issuance in an administrative hearing, but the final agency decision upheld the issuance. Bio-Medical did not appeal the agency decision. Thereafter, a divided panel of the Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's ruling.

Bio-Medical filed an appeal with this Court based on the Court of Appeals' dissent, as well as a petition for a writ of supersedeas. DHHS and Total Renal Care filed separate motions to dismiss Bio-Medical's appeal based on mootness.

*304After hearing oral arguments and carefully reviewing the record, the parties' briefs, and all other documents submitted, the Court concludes that Bio-Medical's claim is moot. Accordingly, Bio-Medical's appeal is dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30725 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DION LAVERT JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-20099-01

- - - - - - - - - - February 20, 1997 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Dion Lavert Jackson argues that the district court clearly erred in failing to adjust his offense level for his minimal or minor participation in the offense. We have reviewed the record, including the presentence report, the transcript of the sentencing hearing, and the briefs and find that the district court did not err in refusing to make an adjustment for Jackson’s minimal or minor role in the offense. Jackson failed to carry his burden of demonstratingNo. 96-30725 - 2 - that he was less culpable than other participants involved in the offense. See United States v. Zuniga , 18 F.3d 1254, 1260 n.10 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 214 (1994). Further, Jackson cannot complain because he was held accountable only for his own offense conduct and not for the conduct of any other participant in the drug transaction. See United States v. Flucas , 99 F.3d 177, 181 (5th Cir. 1996).
AFFIRMED.
Opinion issued October 4 , 2012

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01 - 12 - 00582 - CV

——————————— YVONNE ANDERSON , Appellant

V. BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, L . L . C . , A DELAWARE LIMITED

LIABILITY COMPANY , Appellee

O n Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No . 2

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1009889
MEMORANDUM OPINION In this forcible

- detainer action, appellant, Yvonne Anderson, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of possession in favor of appellee, Bayview Loan2

Servicing, L.L.C., a Delaware Limited Liability Company. 1 On July 31, 2012, Bayview Loan Servicing filed a motion to dismiss Anderson’s appeal as moot, stating that Anderson failed to file a supersedeas bond, a writ of possession was issued, and Bayview Loan Servicing took possession of the subject property on July 19, 2012. See T EX . P ROP . C ODE A NN . § 24.00 7 (West Supp. 2011). Although the failure to supersede a forcible

- detainer judgment does not divest an appellant of the right to appeal, an appeal from a forcible

- detainer action becomes moot if the appellant is no longer in possession of the property , unl ess the appellant holds and asserts “a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession” of the property. Marshall v. Housing Authority of the City of San Antonio , 198 S.W.3d 782, 786

– 87 (Tex. 2006); see Wilhelm v. Fed. Nat. Mortg. Ass ’n , 349 S.W.3d 766, 768 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.); Gallien v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Cor p. , No. 01

- 07

- 00075

- CV, 2008 WL 4670465, at *2

– 4 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Oct. 23, 2008, pet. dism’d w.o.j.). On August 16, 2012, the Clerk of this Court requested a response from Anderson, by August 27, 2012, to Bayview Loan Servicing’s motion to dismiss.

1 In her notice of appeal, appellant states that she is appealing “the determination of the parties [sic] rights to the real property at issue.” Nevertheless, in a forcible

detainer action, “the only issue shall be as to the right to actual possession; and the merits of the title shall not be adjudicated.” T EX . R. C IV . P . 746; see Wilhelm v. Fed. Nat. Mortg. Ass’n , 349 S.W.3d 766, 768

– 69 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.).3

Anderson has not filed a response and, therefore, has failed to assert a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possessio n of the property. See Marshall , 198 S.W.3d at 787; Wilhelm , 349 S.W.3d at 768; Rady v. CitiMortgage, Inc. , No. 03

- 11

- 00734

- CV, 2012 WL 753128, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin March 9, 2012, no pet.). Because Anderson is no longer in possession of the property a nd has not asserted a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession, Anderson’s appeal is moot. See Wilhelm , 349 S.W.3d at 769. Accordingly, we grant appell ee ’s motion, vacate the county court’s judgment, and dismiss the appeal as moot . See Marshall , 198 S.W.3d at 785, 787, 790; Wilhelm , 349 S.W.3d at 769. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp
.
<PAGE>
 
                                 Exhibit 10.7

     Mr. Klag's Employment Agreement is the same as the Employment Agreement in
Exhibit 10.2, which is incorporated herein by reference except as to: (i) the
name of the signatory, which is John L. Klag; (ii) the position in Section 1,
which is Executive Vice President and Investment Officer; (iii) the signatory
for the Company, which is Joseph L. Mancino; (iv) the guarantor for the Company,
which is Joseph L. Mancino; and (v) the amount of the base salary in Section
3(a), which is $187,000.
STATE v. SUTCLIFF.

No. COA06-442.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 20, 2007.

Certification Date March 12, 2007.

Appeal from Pender (03CRS50223, 03CRS50224, 03CRS50225).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 6, 2006By:
    
    /s/ John J. DeeJohn J. DeeChief Financial Officer andSenior Vice President(Principal Financial Officer)
# L_2013022EN.01001901.xml

| 25.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 22/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 22/19

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 22 January 2013

appointing a German member and a German alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/57/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Niclas HERBST. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Niclas HERBST.

| (3) | An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Rolf FISCHER, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Rolf FISCHER,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| a) | as member:






  — | Ms Regina POERSCH, Mitglied des Schleswig-Holsteinischen Landtags |
| --- | --- | --- |

a)

as member:

—

Ms Regina POERSCH, Mitglied des Schleswig-Holsteinischen Landtags

and

| b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Peter LEHNERT, Mitglied des Schleswig-Holsteinischen Landtags. |
| --- | --- | --- |

b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Peter LEHNERT, Mitglied des Schleswig-Holsteinischen Landtags.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 22 January 2013.

For the Council

The President

M. NOONAN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---