alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 28, 2014

d0421

Order 

Clerk

April 28, 2014

148798

DENNIS GUSMANO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148798

COA: 315908

Wayne CC Family Division:

KATHLEEN GUSMANO, 08-123682-DM

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 14, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 10.13

August 1, 2005

Marc Puleo, M.D.
PetMed Express, Inc.
1441 SW 29th Avenue
Pompano Beach, FL 33069

Dear Marc:

      Effective as of the date of this letter, this will confirm
the following:

      *the  agreement between you and PetMed  Express,  Inc.
       (the  "Company"),  including,  but  not  limited   to:
       Executive  Employment Agreement dated  May  15,  1997;
       Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement, dated May
       15, 1997; Executive Employment Agreement, dated May 1,
       1998;   Amended  and  Restated  Executive   Employment
       Agreement,  dated  May  1, 1998;  Second  Amended  and
       Restated Executive Employment Agreement, dated May  1,
       2000;   Amendment  to  Second  Amended  and   Restated
       Executive  Employment  Agreement,  dated  November  8,
       2000, is hereby terminated;

      *there are no outstanding payments of any kind due  or
       owed  to you as a result of any employment agreements,
       including  but  not  limited to,  the  above-mentioned
       agreements;

      *you will no longer serve in the position of President
       of the Company;

      *you  agree  that  all  severance  benefits  will   be
       terminated  in exchange for you remaining employed  at
       the  Company  as an at-will employee, at your  current
       salary  of  $150,000,  and  with  all  current  health
       benefits remaining unchanged;

      *your  current position as Chairman of  the  Board  of
       Directors  (and as a director) remains  unaffected  by
       this agreement; and

      *any  options  referred to in any of the above  stated
       employment  agreements likewise remain  unaffected  by
       this agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered
this Agreement as of August 1, 2005.
                                        PETMED EXPRESS, INC.:



/s/   Marc   Puleo,  M.D.              /s/   Mendo Akdag
--------------------------             ------------------------
MARC PULEO, M.D.                       By: MENDO AKDAG


/s/  Alison Berges                     /s/  Bruce  S. Rosenbloom
--------------------------             -------------------------
Witness                                Witness


                       10.13 Page 1 - 1


<PAGE>
STATE v. HEATH

No. COA05-227

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Pitt (03CRS57879).

Case reported without published opinion. Habitual Impaired Driving-No error. Driving While License Revoked-No error. Providing Fictitious Information to an Officer-Vacated.
STATE of North Carolina v. Gofery Larin HANKINS.

No. 701P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

W. Dale Talbert, Special Deputy Attorney General, Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Michelle F. Lynch, for Gofery Larin Hankins.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd day of January 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
NGUYEN v. LE.

No. COA05-1322.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CVD966).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
JONES v. CITY OF DURHAM.

No. 137A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 30, 2006.

Stewart W. Fisher, Carlos E. Mahoney, William S. Mills, Robert B. Glenn, Durham, for Linda Jones.

Reginald B. Gillespie, Jr., O. William Faison, Durham, for City of Durham.

Mark A. Davis, James B. Blackburn, Raleigh, for County Commissioners, et al.

Bradley N. Schulz, Maria Mobley, Smithfield, for North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Andrew J. Romanet, Jr., for NC League of Municipalities.

Arnetta J. Herring, Debra Bechtel, County Attorney, Bill Little, Assistant City Attorney, Mark Newbold, Deputy City Attorney/Police, for NCAPA.

Edmond W. Caldwell, Jr., Executive Vice Pres./General Counsel, for NC Sheriff's Asso.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of May 2006 *100by NC Sheriffs' Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of May 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Terrance Jerome HAYES.

No. 530P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 9, 2006.

Terrance J. Hayes, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 6th day of October 2006 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2006."
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                          Annual Compliance Certificate


Bank One, West Virginia, N.A., as Trustee
707 Virginia Street East, 2nd Floor
Charleston, West Virginia 25301

Attention:  Corporate Trust Department

     I, C. David Ramsey, President of Southpoint Structured Assets Inc. (the
"Depositor"), hereby certify as follows:

     (a) The review of the activities of the Depositor under the Standard Terms
for Trust Agreements, dated as of November 1, 1996, as amended by the Series
Supplement, dated as of March 19, 1998 (collectively, the "TVA Series 1998-1
Trust Agreement"), by and between the Depositor and Bank One, West Virginia,
N.A., as trustee, for the period from January 1, 2001, through December 31,
2001, and the performance of the Depositor under the TVA Series 1998-1 Trust
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Depositor has
fulfilled all of its obligations and covenants under the TVA Series 1998-1 Trust
Agreement throughout such period.

     Dated: April 1, 2002

                                       Sincerely,



                                       By: /s/ C. David Ramsey
                                           ---------------------------------
                                               C. David Ramsey, President
HY-TECH CONST., INC. v. WAKE COUNTY BD. OF EDUC.

No. COA05-884.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (04CVS388).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
BOND/TEC, INC. v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 6P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

G. Gray Wilson, David M. Fothergill, Winston-Salem, for Scottsdale Insurance Co.

J. Darren Byers, Winston-Salem, for Bond/Tec, Inc.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of January 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."
Exhibit 32.1

The following statement is being made to the Securities and Exchange Commission
solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1349), which carries with it certain criminal penalties in the event of a
knowing or willful misrepresentation.


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC  20549

Re: Fleetclean Systems, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 USC 1349), the undersigned hereby certifies that:

(i)    this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

(ii)    the information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Centiv,
Inc.

Dated May 10, 2004.



By: /s/ Kenneth A. Phillips
---------------------------
Name: Kenneth A. Phillips,
Title: Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer




C



Kenneth A. Phillips, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer
May 10, 2004



                                       19
STATE v. ROGERS.

COA06-99.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Wake (04CRS6892).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 31098 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. EFRAIN GRIMALDO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:11

- CR

- 95

- 2
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, ELROD, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * A jury convicted Efrain Grimaldo of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms or more of cocaine. He appeals his conviction, arguing that the district court violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel of his choosing by denying George O. Jacobs ’s mo tion to enroll as co

- counsel. Grimaldo argues that the Government failed to show a serious potential for conflict based on Jacobs’s prior representation of two cooperating witnesses,

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 6, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-31098 Document: 00513220346 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/06/2015No. 14

- 31098

2 Sabino Duarte and David Garza. See Wheat v. United States , 486 U.S. 153 , 159, 164 (1988)

. Grimaldo limits his argument to Jacobs’s statements during the hearing held pursuant to United States v. Garcia, 517 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1975), abrogated on other grounds by Flanagan v. United States , 465 U.S. 259, 263 & n.2 (1984) ; howev er, in later district court pleadings, those statements were shown to be inaccurate , and this court may affirm on any basis in the record,

see United States v. Grosz, 76 F.3d 1318, 1324 n.6 (5th Cir. 1996)

. The entire record shows that the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion to enroll. See United States v. Sanchez Guerrero, 546 F.3d 328, 332

- 33 (5th Cir. 2008). Grimaldo and Duarte were codefendants in the instant case; Duarte pleaded guilty and testified against Grimaldo at trial

. Jacobs previously represented Duarte throughout a state drug proceeding, including at trial, and he was convicted. The instant case and Duarte’s prior state case were related. Thus, Grimaldo has not shown that the district court erred by deter mining that the Government had established a serious potential for conflict in connection with Jacobs’s proposed representation of Grimaldo. See Wheat , 486 U.S. at 164

. Because we find that the district court’s denial of the motion to enroll
was proper vis

- à

- vis Jacobs’s prior representation of Duarte, we need not address Grimaldo’s arguments regarding Garza or the untimeliness of the motion. See Grosz, 76 F.3d at 1324 n.6 . Finally, Grimaldo’s argument that the district court applied the incorrect lega l sta ndard is belied by the record; as explained, the district court properly determined that there was a serious potential for conflict based on Jacob s ’s prior attorney

- client relationship with Duarte. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. Case: 14-31098 Document: 00513220346 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/06/2015
IN RE N.L.P.

COA05-1571.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Davidson (03J118).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. HENDRICKS

No. COA05-1465

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Guilford (03CRS24477, 03CRS86195).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 224/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 224/2013 of 6 March 2013 entering a name in the register of protected designations            of origin and protected geographical indications (Kitkan viisas (PDO))         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 224/2013                     

# of 6 March 2013

# entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Kitkan viisas                        (PDO))                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006                              of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs(2).

(2)Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Finland’s application to register the name ‘Kitkan viisas’ was published                              in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3).

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name                              should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 March 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.7.****Fresh fish, molluscs and crustaceans and products derived therefrom**U.K.

#### FINLANDU.K.

Kitkan viisas (PDO)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.                           

3

OJ C 136, 11.5.2012, p. 13.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 136 (Monday, July 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42715-42716]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15327]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, July 20, 2022; 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be held remotely.

[[Page 42716]]


STATUS: Commission Meeting--Closed to the Public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Briefing Matter: Commission staff will brief 
the Commission on a compliance matter.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Alberta E. Mills, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 
(Cell).

    Dated: July 13, 2022.
Alberta E. Mills,
Commission Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-15327 Filed 7-14-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1994-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         656,907
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26,319
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               683,226
<PP&E>                                         3,000,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,790,099)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 893,618
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,038
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     889,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   893,618
<SALES>                                        118,460
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,513
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  64,385<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,375)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,375)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,375)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-3 (Nos. 333-35366, 333-51176, 333-108646,333-110201 and 333-116146), on Form S-4 (No. 333-109881)and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-28277, 333-46691, 333-77961,333-90091, 333-31026, 333-36374, 333-48844, 333-55092,333-98779, 333-101704, 333-111138, 333-111141, 333-111681,333-120997 and 333-122404) of our report dated October 28,2005 relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, of IntellisyncCorporation, which appears in this Form 10-K.
| /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| San Jose, California           |
| October 28, 2005          |

 

----
exv10w8



 






EXHIBIT 10.8




DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION PAYABLE TO

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS




     On May 4, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors of Connetics Corporation approved the payment of the
following compensation to each non-employee director of the Board in respect of his or her service
on the Board, effective April 1, 2005:




	•	 	An annual retainer fee of $30,000. The
annual retainer fee is payable, at the director’s election, in cash or shares of
Connetics’ common stock.






	•	 	An initial stock option grant to purchase 30,000 shares of Connetics’ common stock,
granted on the date on which the individual first becomes a director. The exercise price
for the option is equal to the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.
The option vests in four equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth
anniversaries of the date of grant.






	•	 	An annual stock option grant to purchase 15,000 shares of Connetics’ common stock in
each year the director is re-elected to the Board if, on the date of grant, the director
has served on the Board for at least six months. The exercise price for the option is
equal to the fair market value of Connetics’ common stock on the date of grant. The
option is exercisable in full on the first anniversary of the date of grant.






	•	 	A fee of $2,000 for each Board meeting attended in person, which will increase to
$2,500 effective January 1, 2006.






	•	 	A fee of $500 for each regularly scheduled Board meeting attended by telephone, which
will increase to $1,000 effective January 1, 2006.






	•	 	A fee of $1,000 for each Board committee meeting attended in person or $500 for each
Board committee meeting attended by telephone.






	•	 	An annual retainer of $15,000 for the chair of the Audit Committee, which is payable in
cash in quarterly installments.






	•	 	An annual retainer of $7,500 for the chair of the Compensation Committee and for the
chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee, which is payable in cash in quarterly
installments.






	•	 	Reimbursement of out-of pocket expenses incurred by the director in connection with
attending Board meetings.