alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Air Force

Army

Navy/Marines

Other Defense

25%

47%

14%

13%

$2.7

$2.4

$1.9

$1.5 $1.3 $1.3 $1.1 $1.1

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

81%

1%

17%

0%

Construcon: 18%

Research and

 Development: 1%

Service: 40%

Supplies and

 Equipment: 42%

Acve Duty: 56%

Civilian: 18%

Naonal Guard/

Reserve: 26%

Textron

Northrop Grumman

Leading Technology Composites

Archer Western Aviaon Partners

Raytheon

Beechcra

General Electric

Balfour‐Walton, JV

Booz Allen Hamilton

Boeing

$122.3 M

$69.1 M

$51.8 M

$46.4 M

$29.8 M

$29.6 M

$23.1 M

$22.7 M

$21.0 M

$19.6 M

Geary

Sedgwick

Leavenworth

Shawnee

Johnson

Riley

Wyandoe

Saline

Ellis

Montgomery

County

18,606

7,142

6,324

2,826

915

627

443

331

207

202

Total*

15,640

2,912

3,428

38

28

37

ND

ND

ND

ND

Acve Duty

   Military

2,749

965

2,378

606

84

81

24

50

15

ND

Civilian

 FISCAL YEAR 2017

KANSAS

   DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Con ense Con ense Contractors (M=millions)

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

   DEFENSE PERSONNEL

Allocaons, By Type

Allocaons, By Service

$2.0 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

$2.0 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

39,572

TOTAL PERSONNEL

39,572

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Loc sonnel Loc sonnel Locaons

*Total also includes unif al also includes uniformed Na ormed Naonal Guar onal Guard and R d and Reserve units. e units.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

48 Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017
AF Actve AF Guard Army Actve Army Guard

KANSAS

#30 #23 0.8% $1,067 #39 #21 #20

$3.1 B

SPENT IN STATE

1.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S.

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $1.1 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

39,572 NUMBER

OF PERSONNEL

$2.0 B PERSONNEL

SPENDING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)(M=millions) (M=millions)

Sedgwick County

$434.6 M

Leavenworth County

$200.0 M

Geary County

$114.2 M

Johnson County

$49.6 M

Cowley County

$23.4 M

Labete County

$22.6 M

Butler County

$20.5 M

Shawnee County

$17.0 M

Riley County

$13.2 M

Wyandote County

$9.2 M

Sedgwick

Geary Leavenworth

Johnson

Cowley Labete

Butler

Shawnee

Riley

Wyandote

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions) B=billions)(M=millions

Geary County

$1.0 B

Leavenworth County

$508.8 M

Sedgwick County

$311.3 M

Shawnee County

$96.1 M

Johnson County

$20.4 M

Riley County

$16.7 M

Saline County

$9.6 M

Wyandote County

$7.8 M

Brown County

$5.8 M

Douglas County

$4.9 M

Geary Leavenworth

Sedgwick

Shawnee

Johnson

Riley

Saline

Wyandote

Brown

Douglas

Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017 49
# L_2014091DE.01004902.xml

| 27.3.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 91/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 91/49

---

Berichtigung des Durchführungsbeschlusses 2013/713/EU der Kommission vom 29. November 2013 zur Gründung des Europäischen Infrastrukturnetzes für klinische Forschung (ECRIN) als Konsortium für eine europäische Forschungsinfrastruktur (ERIC ECRIN)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 324 vom 5. Dezember 2013
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 324 vom 5. Dezember 2013

Seite 20, Anhang III, Nr. 5:

anstatt:

„Die Beobachter des ERIC ECRIN tragen mit ihrem lokalen Beitrag und ihrem Kernbeitrag zum Jahreshaushalt bei, wie in Anhang III.3 Buchstabe a dieser Satzung vorgesehen.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Beobachter des ERIC ECRIN tragen mit ihrem lokalen Beitrag zum Jahreshaushalt bei, wie in Anhang III.3 Buchstabe a dieser Satzung vorgesehen.“

---
OX 3 -te

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA # 02-15-00141-CR OFFENSE: 22.011

Kenny Fernell Graves v. The State

STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Tarrant

COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 213th District Court

DATE: 12/17/15 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 1361708D

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Kenny Fernell Graves v.

STYLE: Texas

, The State of

Petition

MS:

023-/&

PRO <=>£ CCA Disposition:

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CO DATE:

^yusei) JUDGE:

DATE: f)S/Of1*0*4

JUDGE: nli LUA^^

SIGNED: PC:

PUBLISH: DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:

ELECTRONIC RECORD
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5477 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5477

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2008

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 120 South Del Mar Avenue in San Gabriel, California, as the ``Chi 
                      Mui Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHI MUI POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 120 South Del Mar Avenue in San Gabriel, California, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Chi Mui Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Chi Mui 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN RE G.T.B.

No. COA06-467.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Dare (04J78).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
HOLLY RIDGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND ITS DIVISION OF LAND RESOURCES; William P. Holman, in his official capacity; and Charles H. Gardner, in his official capacity, Respondents, and North Carolina Shellfish Growers Association and North Carolina Coastal Federation, Intervenor-Respondents.

No. 218A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Alexander Elkan, George W. House, S. Kyle Woosley, Greensboro, for Holly Ridge Associates, LLC.

James Gulick, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Nancy Reed Dunn, Assistant Attorney General, for NCDENR, et al.

Derb S. Carter, Jr., Chapel Hill, Amy Pickle, for NC Shellfish Growers Asso., et al.

*468Prior report: N.C.App. ___, 627 S.E.2d 326.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of April 2006 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Petitioner on the 25th day of April 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Petitioner's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.

Petitioner shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 3, 2015

h0223 

# Order

Clerk March 3, 2015

149688

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 149688

COA: 320657

Oakland CC: 2010

- 234230

- FC

ANDREW JOSEPH McKNIGHT,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 30, 2014 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------

CERTIFICATIONS OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND TREASURER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Capital Beverage Corporation (the " Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Carmine N. Stella, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 26, 2008
|----------------------



|/s/ Carmine N. Stella
Name: Carmine N. StellaTitle: Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Capital Beverage Corporation (the " Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Carol Russell, hereby certify in my capacity as Treasurer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 26, 2008
|----------------------



|/s/ Carol Russell
Name: Carol RussellTitle: Treasurer
|-----------------------------------------------------



---
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00265-CV

CHESTER WILDER AND CAROLYN 

WILDER, Appellants

V.

JOHNSTON CUSTOM HOMES, INC. AND 

JEROLD B. JOHNSTON, Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Court at 

Law No. 3

of Tarrant County (2017-005058-3)

August 15, 2019

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
STATE v. STURDIVANT.

No. COA05-1194.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Union (03CRS51227, 03CRS51228, 03CRS51229, 03CRS51230, 03CRS51231, 03CRS51232, 03CRS51233, 03CRS51234, 03CRS51235, 03CRS51236, 03CRS51237).

Case without published opinion. No error.
# L_2020436DE.01007701.xml

| 28.12.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 436/77 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.12.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 436/77

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2013/36/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 26. Juni 2013 über den Zugang zur Tätigkeit von Kreditinstituten und die Beaufsichtigung von Kreditinstituten und Wertpapierfirmen, zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2002/87/EG und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinien 2006/48/EG und 2006/49/EG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 176 vom 27. Juni 2013
  )

Seite 402, Abschnitt II Artikel 123 Absatz 2 Satz 2:

Anstatt:

„... Die zuständigen Behörden verlangen von den Instituten, über Artikel 383 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 575/2013 hinaus jedes weitere bedeutende Geschäft mit diesen Unternehmen zu melden. Diese Verfahren und bedeutenden Geschäfte werden von den zuständigen Behörden überwacht.“

muss es heißen:

„... Die zuständigen Behörden verlangen von den Instituten, über Artikel 394 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 575/2013 hinaus jedes weitere bedeutende Geschäft mit diesen Unternehmen zu melden. Diese Verfahren und bedeutenden Geschäfte werden von den zuständigen Behörden überwacht.“

---
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1329/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1329/2013 of 12 December 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1329/2013                     

# of 12 December 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. Roger Dale BROOKS.

No. 48P00-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, William C. Young, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of September 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of November 2006."
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5729 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide comprehensive 

health care to children of Vietnam veterans born with 

Spina Bifida, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

HR 5729 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Spina Bifida Health 

3 Care Program Expansion Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE BY 

5 SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS TO CHIL6 DREN OF VIETNAM VETERANS BORN WITH 

7 SPINA BIFIDA. 

8 (a) PROVISION OF COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH

9 CARE.—Section 1803(a) of title 38, United States Code, 

10 is amended by striking ‘‘such health care as the Secretary 

11 determines is needed by the child for the spina bifida or 

12 any disability that is associated with such condition’’ and 

13 inserting ‘‘health care under this section’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to care furnished 

16 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE v. Terrence Rodricus ELLIOTT.

No. 184A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 13, 2006.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill, for Elliott.

William N. Farrell, Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of February 2006 by Appellee for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 14th day of February 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 13th day of February 2006."
IN RE J.P.H.

No. COA05-1437.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 19, 2006

Certification Date October 9, 2006.

Appeal from Davidson (04J113, 04J114)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7068

JOHN WAYNE BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. D. NETHERLAND, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-715-AM)

Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 26, 1997

Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Wayne Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Katherine P. Baldwin, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended

by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L.

No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning

of the district court. Brown v. Netherland, No. CA-95-715-AM (E.D.

Va. May 22, 1996). We deny Appellant's motions for the appointment

of counsel, objecting to the terms of the Prison Litigation Reform

Act, for compliance with prior court order, and requesting this

court to order the institution where he is incarcerated to follow

the procedures stated in this court's prior order.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5638 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to create an exception from infringement for certain component parts used to repair another article of 

manufacture. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2008 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to create an exception from infringement for certain component parts used 

to repair another article of manufacture. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXCEPTION FROM INFRINGEMENT FOR CER4 TAIN COMPONENT PARTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 271 of title 35, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(j) It shall not be an act of infringement to make, 

9 use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5638 IH

1 into the United States any article of manufacture that 

2 itself constitutes a component part of another article of 

3 manufacture, if the sole purpose of the component part 

4 is for the repair of the article of manufacture of which 

5 it is a part so as to restore its original appearance.’’. 

6 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub7 section (a) applies to acts done on or after March 13, 

8 2008. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS