alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Certification
      of CEO




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of KH Funding Company (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert L. Harris,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
                15(d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
                Company.




Dated:
                November 17, 2006
            
            /s/ Robert
              L.
              HarrisRobert
                L. HarrisPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.




This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
      by
      such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to
      the
      extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Anthony STARKEY.

No. 271P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Benjamin Dowling-Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Michael A. Starkley.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 18th day of May 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Lenoir County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 18th day of May *1972006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision and order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
# C_2013039EN.01002601.xml

| 12.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/26

---

COMMISSION DECISION

COMMISSION DECISION

of 21 December 2012

on public holidays for 2014 for the institutions of the European Union

2013/C 39/03

PUBLIC HOLIDAYS FOR 2014

PUBLIC HOLIDAYS FOR 2014

| 1 January | Wednesday, New Year’s Day |
| --- | --- |
| 2 January | Thursday, the day following New Year’s Day |
| 17 April | Maundy Thursday/Holy Thursday |
| 18 April | Good Friday |
| 21 April | Easter Monday |
| 1 May | Thursday, Labour Day |
| 9 May | Friday, Anniversary of the Declaration made by President Robert Schuman in 1950 |
| 29 May | Thursday, Ascension Day |
| 30 May | Friday, the day following Ascension Day |
| 9 June | Whit Monday |
| 21 July | Monday, Belgian National Holiday |
| 15 August | Friday, Assumption Day |
| 24 December to 31 December | Wednesday
  6 end-of-year days
  Wednesday |
| TOTAL | 18 days |

1 January

Wednesday, New Year’s Day

2 January

Thursday, the day following New Year’s Day

17 April

Maundy Thursday/Holy Thursday

18 April

Good Friday

21 April

Easter Monday

1 May

Thursday, Labour Day

9 May

Friday, Anniversary of the Declaration made by President Robert Schuman in 1950

29 May

Thursday, Ascension Day

30 May

Friday, the day following Ascension Day

9 June

Whit Monday

21 July

Monday, Belgian National Holiday

15 August

Friday, Assumption Day

24 December to 31 December

Wednesday

6 end-of-year days

Wednesday

TOTAL

18 days

Luxembourg: same days apply as in Brussels.

Work will resume as normal on Monday 5 January 2015.

Without prejudice to the schedule of public holidays for 2015, Friday 2 January 2015 will be a holiday.

The Commission reserves the right to modify these provisions, should the needs of the service so require.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 9, 2010 

s0830 

Order 

 

September 9, 2010 

140606 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140606 

 COA: 293988 

Wayne CC: 04-009115 

JOSHUA JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 29, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
EARLY v. DURHAM DSS.

No. 524PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 12, 2006.

Lowell L. Siler, Deputy County Attorney, for County of Durham DSS.

Patrice Walker, for Marsha A. Early.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of July 2006 by NC Association of County Commissioners for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(*l*). By order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of July 2006."
STATE v. Jack MOORE.

No. 253P06-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 26, 2006.

Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*298The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of July 2006 by Defendant for Petition of Habeas Corpus in Motion to Resubmit Petition of Motion for Appropriate Relief/Certiorari:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of July 2006."
#### Arthur I. Warren, Sr., et al., Respondents, v Partnership Properties, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[801 NYS2d 854]

*1345Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered October 4, 2004 in a personal injury action. The order denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, the motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed.

Memorandum: Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for injuries sustained by Arthur I. Warren, Sr. (plaintiff) when he slipped and fell on the sidewalk outside the housing complex where plaintiffs reside. Supreme Court erred in denying defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Defendants met their initial burden by establishing that plaintiff slipped and fell as the result of an ongoing ice storm, and plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact “whether the ice upon which [plaintiff] slipped was present for a sufficient period of time prior to the storm such that defendants could be found to have had actual or constructive notice thereof’ *(Cohen v A.R. Fuel,*290 AD2d 640, 642 [2002]; *see Campagnano v Highgate Manor of Rensselaer,*299 AD2d 714, 715-716 [2002]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe and Martoche, JJ.
STATE v. JONES.

COA05-1409.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS19668, 04CRS19669, 04CRS30727)

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
XIU CHAI JIN, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 08-74758 Agency No. A071-568-382
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 19, 2013 **

San Francisco, California Before: NOONAN, O’SCANNLAIN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. Xiu Chai Jin, a native and citizen of Ch ina, petitions for review of the BIA’s decision denying her second motion to reopen immigration proceedings. We dismiss in part and deny in part her petition for review. 

# FILED
APR 24 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALSThe BIA has “broad discretion to grant or deny” motions to reopen immigration proceedings. INS v. Doherty , 502 U.S. 314, 323 (1992). Here, the BIA did not abuse its discretion when it determined that Jin failed to show reasonable cause for missing her exclusion hearing in 1993 and for delaying thirteen years before filing her first motion to reopen. Likewise, the BIA did not abuse its discretion when it found that Jin failed to show changed circumstances in China sufficient to justify reopening immigration proceedings. We lack jurisdiction to review Jin’s claim to the extent she challenges the BIA’s refusal to exercise its sua sponte discretion to reopen. Ekimian v. INS , 303 F.3d 1153, 1159 (9th Cir. 2002); see also Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder , 633 F.3d 818, 823–24 (9th Cir. 2011) (reaffirming Ekimian ). PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.
exv10w5



 






Exhibit 10.5




Schedule of Substantially Identical Documents Omitted



The Guarantee of Parker Drilling Company guaranteeing the obligations of the Parker Drilling
Company of Oklahoma Incorporated, Sucursal del Peru (“Parker OK”) in the Agreement for Purchase
and Sale of Assets between Parker OK and Saxon Services del Peru, S.A. (“Saxon Peru”) dated May 6,
2005 (referenced as Exhibit 10.2 herein), was filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s 8-K filed May
12, 2005.



Parker Drilling Company also executed substantially similar guarantees on June 15, 2006,
guaranteeing the obligations of the respective subsidiaries of Parker Drilling Company named as the
offeror or vendor(s) in the following agreements:





	 	(a)	 	Irrevocable Commercial Offer for the Purchase and Sale of Assets from Parker Drilling
Company International Limited (“PDCIL”), as offeror, to Saxon Services de Panama, S.A.
(“Saxon Panama”) dated May 6, 2005 (referenced in Exhibit 10.1 herein),
	 
	 	(b)	 	Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Assets (Rig 228) between Universal Rig
Service Corp. and PDCIL, as vendors, and Saxon Peru dated May 6, 2005 (referenced in
Exhibit 10.4 herein)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Inter-American Foundation

# TIME AND DATE: 

August 2, 2022, ET.

# PLACE: 

Via Zoom.

# STATUS: 

Meeting of the Advisory Council, open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

 Call to Order

 Overview of Meeting Rules by Associate General Counsel

 President/CEO update

 Management Team Updates

 Adjournment

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Nicole Stinson, Associate General Counsel, (202) 683-7117.

*For Dial-in Information Contact:*                         Nicole Stinson, Associate General Counsel, (202) 683-7117.                    

The Inter-American Foundation is holding this meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b).

Nicole Stinson,

Associate General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2022-14945 Filed 7-8-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7025-01-P
CLOUGH v. HUNSECKER.

No. COA05-964.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Dare (01CVD637)

Case without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
# L_2015290EN.01001801.xml

| 6.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 290/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 290/18

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2013/728/EU of 2 December 2013 establishing the position to be taken by the European Union within the Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization as regards an extension of the moratorium on customs duties on electronic transmissions and the moratorium on non-violation and situation complaints

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 332 of 11 December 2013
  )

On page 17, Article 1, indents:

for:

| ‘— | TRIPS non-violation and situation complaints [...], |
| --- | --- |

‘—

TRIPS non-violation and situation complaints [...],

| — | e-commerce [...].’, |
| --- | --- |

—

e-commerce [...].’,

read:

| ‘— | TRIPS non-violation and situation complaints WT/MIN(13)/W/2, |
| --- | --- |

‘—

TRIPS non-violation and situation complaints WT/MIN(13)/W/2,

| — | e-commerce WT/MIN(13)/W/3.’. |
| --- | --- |

—

e-commerce WT/MIN(13)/W/3.’.

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, John D. Reedy, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s thirdfiscal quarter of 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 4, 2005
Exhibit 4.1

                  INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
                             STATE OF NEVADA

                           VIPER NETWORKS, INC.
                     Your Internet phone company(TM)
  NUMBER                                                          SHARES
___________                                                     __________

                                                     CUSIP NO. 92762r 10 5

This is to certify that

___________________________________________________________


is the record holder of

___________________________________________________________

shares of VIPER NETWORKS, INC. Common Stock transferable on the books of the
corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this
certificate properly endorsed.  This Certificate is not valid until
countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.

     Witness the facsimile seal of the corporation and the facsimile
signatures of its duly authorized officers.

Dated:


 /s/ Jason Sunstein                   /s/ Ronald Weaver
--------------------------           ---------------------------
Jason Sunstein, Secretary            Ronald Weaver, President

                    VIPER NETWROKS, INC.
                      CORPORATE SEAL
                         NEVADA
CURTIS NORRIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3107

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 14, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

Barbara K. Hobbs, Judge.

Curtis Norris, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, THOMAS, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Condition and the Statement of Operation for the period ended
September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,264
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             834
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    50
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          65,241
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            64,278
<LOANS>                                        535,414
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 651,826
<DEPOSITS>                                     503,841
<SHORT-TERM>                                    74,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,239
<LONG-TERM>                                     17,576
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,122
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 651,826
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,877
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,325
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,202
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,358
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,365
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,837
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,841
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,437
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,629
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.820
<LOANS-NON>                                      4,261
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,388
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      122
<RECOVERIES>                                        57
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,323
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,323
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          3,323


</TABLE>
WAGNER v. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST CO.

No. COA05-1334.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from New Hanover (04CVS2366).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.