alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
6ii01SO

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT

HELENA, MONTANA 59620-3003

Supreme Court No.

DA 20-0019

KRISTINE DAVENPORT,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF LINCOLN, a political

subdivision of the State of Montana;

SHERIFF OF COUNTY OF LINCOLN,

State of Montana, and ROBY BOWE,

Defendants and Appellees.

FILED

MAR 0 6 2020

Bowen Greenw000

Clerk of Suprerne Coun

State of IVIontana

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Pursuant to authority granted under M. R. App.P. 26(1), Appellant is given an extension of time

until April 13, 2020, to prepare, file, and serve the opening brief.

DATED this March 6, 2020

owen eenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Kristine Davenport, Gregory L. Bonilla

PO BOX 203003 • HELENA MT • 59620-3003 • TELEPHONE: (406) 444-3858 • FAX: (406) 444-5705

03/06/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0019
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**







Certification
      of CEO




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of KH Funding Company (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert L. Harris,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:
                November 19, 2007
            /s/
                Robert L. HarrisRobert
                L. HarrisPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.




This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
      by
      such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Such
      certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to
      the
      extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-31287 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus H. DONOVAN SEATON, et al., Defendants, H. DONOVAN SEATON, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-1254 G
- - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996 Before SMITH, BENDAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appellant H. Donovan Seaton appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence, arguing that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, that the court made several errors in sentencing him, and that the prosecution obtained his guilty plea through outrageous conduct and coercion. Seaton raises his substantive ineffective-assistance claims and an assertion that an enhancement to his base offense levelNo. 95-31287 -2- violated the Ex Post Facto Clause for the first time on appeal. Seaton has not shown plain error as to these claims. See Robertson v. Plano City of Texas , 70 F.3d 21, 23 (5th Cir. 1995). As to Seaton’s other claims, this court AFFIRMS essentially for the reasons cited by the magistrate judge and district court. United States v. Seaton , No. 91-364-”G” (E.D. La. Oct. 13, 1995). AFFIRMED.
56 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

General Dynamics $482.5 M

Martin’s Point Health Care $355.5 M

Innovyze Inc. $31.8 M

Engineered Construction Services Inc. $30.3 M

Asturian Group $22.6 M

Cianbro Companies $21.4 M

Precision Partners LLC $19.5 M

City of Bangor $17.7 M

Methuen Construction $16.8 M

Q.E.D. Systems $15.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

MAINE

#39 #15 0.4% $1,422 #38 #43 #36

$1.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $1.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,157 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$701.8 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,157

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

York ND 6,682 113 194

Penobscot ND 404 1,546 149

Kennebec 39 186 644 ND

Aroostook ND 596 108 ND

Cumberland 22 73 412 164 671

Sagadahoc 20 309 ND ND

Androscoggin ND 18 99 97

Oxford ND ND 98 ND

Washington ND 67 ND ND

Somerset ND ND 63 ND

Service: 56%

Supplies and

Equipment: 39%

Research and 

Construction: 3% Development: 2%

Active Duty: 1%

Civilian: 69%

National 

Guard: 25%

Reserve: 5% 

4%

62%

1%

34%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

22%

60%

12%

6%

$5.1

$1.7 $2.1

$1.4 $1.4 $1.7

$2.7

$1.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 57

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MAINE

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Sagadahoc

Cumberland

York

Washington

Penobscot

Kennebec

Waldo

Oxford

Aroostook

Androscoggin

(M = millions)

$447.8 M

$372.3 M

$278.5 M

$30.6 M

$28.9 M

$22.2 M

$5.4 M

$4.1 M

$3.5 M

$3.2 M

York

Penobscot

Kennebec

Sagadahoc

Aroostook

Cumberland

Washington

Androscoggin

Hancock

Oxford

$513.1 M

$65.0 M

$33.0 M

$32.0 M

$30.3 M

$16.4 M

$4.4 M

$3.1 M

$2.2 M

$1.3 M

Aroostook

Penobscot

Oxford Washington

Kennebec

Androscoggin

Hancock

Cumberland

Sagadahoc

York

Aroostook

Penobscot

Androscoggin Oxford

Cumberland

York Sagadahoc

Kennebec

Washington

Waldo
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We haveissued our reports dated March 13, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statementsand schedules included in the Annual Report ofINX Inc. (formerly I-Sector Corporation) on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference ofsaid reports inthe Registration Statements of INX Inc. (formerly I-SectorCorporation) on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-41001, effectiveNovember 25, 1997 and File No. 333-60320, effective May 7, 2001)./s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.1

GLOBAL SIGNAL INC.CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobalSignal Inc., (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March  31,  2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Wesley R. Edens, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                    |
|--|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ Wesley R.EdensWesley R. EdensChief Executive Officerand President

May  10,2006

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to Global Signal Inc. and will beretained by Global Signal, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Thiscertification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the‘‘Exchange Act’’). Such certification willnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to theextent that the registrant specifically incorporates it byreference.

----
IN RE D.L.C.

No. COA05-357

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Robeson (04J06).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Income Fund I (the Fund), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President of the Manager and of the Fund, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Fund filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
 
 
 
 /s/ James A. Coyne
 James A. Coyne
 President of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 August 13, 2004
STATE v. ALLEN.

No. COA05-1480.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (02CRS40899).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
NOT RECOMMENDED F OR F ULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Na me: 12a0617n.06 No. 11-3867 UNI TED STATES COURT OF A PPEAL S FOR THE SI XTH CI RCUI T TYRONE R. J OHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant,

v. PHI L L I P KERNS, W arde n, Respondent-Appe llee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEALFROM THE U NI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE NORTHE RN DI STRI CT OF OHI O

Be fore : MARTI

N and CLAY, Circuit J udg es; HOOD , District J udg e. *

P ER CURIAM . Ty

rone R. J ohnson, an Ohio prisoner proce eding pro se , moves this Court for a rehe aring of its Marc h 29, 2012 order denying his application for a cer tificate of appea lability

. The application for a cer tificate of appea lability aros e from the district court’s order denying J ohnson’s petition for a writ of habe as cor pus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Upon review, we conclude that the Court did not act under any misapprehe nsion of law or fac t in denying J ohnson’s application for a cer tificate of appea lability

. See Fe d. R. App. P. 40(a). Acc ording ly , the motion for re hear ing is de nied.

The Honora

ble J oseph M. Hood, United States District J udg e for the Easter n Di s t ri ct of * Kentucky , sitti ngby

designation.
STATE v. MYERS and COLEMAN.

No. 660PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Thomas Henry Myers.

Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Jesse Warren Coleman.

Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of May 2006 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 31st day of May 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2006."
# L_2013077EN.01002301.xml

| 20.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 77/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 77/23

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 18 March 2013

appointing an Austrian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/140/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Austrian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Elisabeth GROSSMANN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Elisabeth GROSSMANN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as alternate member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Mr Michael SCHICKHOFER, Landesrat. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Michael SCHICKHOFER, Landesrat.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 18 March 2013.

For the Council

The President

S. COVENEY

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 136 (Monday, July 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15274]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 2, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. The Bell Family Voting Trust (``Trust''), Wisconsin Rapids, 
Wisconsin and Steven C. Bell and Paula J. Bell, both of Wisconsin 
Rapids, Wisconsin, Elizabeth Bell Killian, Spokane, Washington, Rebecca 
L. Kettleson, Wausau, Wisconsin and Margaret S. Bell, Chicago, 
Illinois, all co-trustees of the Trust; to become members of the Bell 
Family Control Group, a group acting in concert, to acquire voting 
shares of WoodTrust Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly 
acquire voting shares of WoodTrust Bank, both of Wisconsin Rapids, 
Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-15274 Filed 7-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ART 5 FDS
FOR FIRST QUARTER 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,454
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,956
<ALLOWANCES>                                       348
<INVENTORY>                                      2,419
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,093
<PP&E>                                          29,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,062
<BONDS>                                         72,433
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,536
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,119
<SALES>                                         10,913
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,913
<CGS>                                            1,534
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,576)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,576)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,576)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. DAVIS.

No. COA05-1056.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 1, 2006.

Certification Date August 21, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS53434).

Case without published opinion. No error.
****
 **EXHIBIT
12 - STATEMENTS RE: COMPUTATION OF RATIOS**
 
 **Appalachian
Bancshares, Inc.**
 Computation
of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
 **Year
      Ended December 31,****2004**
    
    2003
    
    2002(Dollars
      in thousands)Pretax
      income
    
    **$**
    **5,932**
    
    $
    4,340
    
    $
    3,674Add
      fixed charges:Interest
      on deposits
    
    
    **6,209**
    
    
    6,959
    
    
    9,353Interest
      on borrowings
    
    
    **1,349**
    
    
    1,297
    
    
    2,073Portion
      of rental expense representing interest expense
    
    
    **30**
    
    
    27
    
    
    23Total
      fixed charges
    
    
    **7,588**
    
    
    8,283
    
    
    11,449Income
      before fixed charges
    
    **$**
    **13,520**
    
    $
    12,623
    
    $
    15,123Pretax
      income
    
    **$**
    **5,932**
    
    $
    4,340
    
    $
    3,674Add
      fixed charges (excluding interest on deposits):Interest
      on borrowings
    
    
    **1,349**
    
    
    1,297
    
    
    2,073Portion
      of rental expense representing interest expense
    
    
    **30**
    
    
    27
    
    
    23Total
      fixed charges
    
    
    **1,379**
    
    
    1,324
    
    
    2,096Income
      before fixed charges (excluding interest on deposits)
    
    **$**
    **7,311**
    
    $
    5,664
    
    $
    5,770**Ratio
      of Earnings to Fixed Charges**Including
      interest on deposits
    
    
    **1.78**
    
    
    1.52
    
    
    1.32Excluding
      interest on deposits
    
    
    **5.30**
    
    
    4.28
    
    
    2.75
IN RE M.G.

No. COA06-54.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Alamance (03J270, 03J271).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED
September 17, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20177 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JESSE JUDE CARTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-519-ALL

-------------------- Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jesse Jude Carter ap peals his guilty-plea conviction under

18 U.S.C. § 922(g) for possession of a firearm by a convicted

felon. He argues that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional on

its face and as applied because it does not require a showing of a

“substantial” effect on interstate commerce. He acknowledges that

his claim is foreclosed by Fifth Circuit precedent and states that

he raises the claim to preserve it for possible Supreme Court

review.2

Carter’s claim is foreclosed by circuit precedent. S ee United

States v. Cavazos , 288 F.3d 706, 712-13 (5th Cir.), cert. denied
,
537 U.S. 910 (2002); United States v. Daugherty
, 264 F.3d 513, 518

& n.12 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied
, 534 U.S. 1150 (2002).

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.