alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Council Decision of 16 September 2013 appointing a Judge to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (2013/457/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 16 September 2013

# appointing a Judge to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal

# (2013/457/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the fourth paragraph of Article 257                           thereof,                        

Having regards to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular paragraph 1 of Article 106a                           thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Under Articles 2 and 3(1) of the Annex I to Protocol No 3 on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, annexed                              to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and the Treaty establishing the European                              Atomic Energy Community, and following the resignation with effect from 1 October 2013 of Ms Irena BORUTA, a judge of the                              European Union Civil Service Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Civil Service Tribunal’) should be appointed for the                              period from 1 October 2013 to 30 September 2019.

(2)A public call for applications(1) was issued.

(3)The Committee provided for by Article 3(3) of Annex I to Protocol No 3 met on 4 and 5 June and on 2 and 3 July 2013. Following                              its discussions, it delivered an opinion on the candidates’ suitability to perform the duties of a Judge of the Civil Service                              Tribunal to which opinion it appended a list of candidates having the most appropriate high-level experience.

(4)It is therefore appropriate to appoint one of the persons included on that list as Judge of the Civil Service Tribunal, for                              the period from 1 October 2013 to 30 September 2019, ensuring a balanced composition of the Civil Service Tribunal on as broad                              a geographical basis as possible from among nationals of the Member States and with respect to the national legal systems                              represented,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Jesper SVENNINGSEN is hereby appointed as Judge to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal for the period from 1 October                     2013 to 30 September 2019.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

Done at Brussels, 16 September 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

L. Linkevičius                            

1

OJ C 82, 21.3.2013, p. 5.
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Lamont BULLOCK.

No. 308P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Christopher L. Bullock, Pro Se.

Thomas J. Ziko, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 5th day of June 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of June 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
# Council Decision of 26 September 2013 amending Decision 1999/70/EC concerning the external auditors of the national central            banks, as regards the external auditors of the Banco de España (2013/481/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 26 September 2013

# amending Decision 1999/70/EC concerning the external auditors of the national central banks, as regards the external auditors                        of the Banco de España                     

# (2013/481/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Protocol (No 4) on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank                           annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular to Article                           27.1 thereof,                        

Having regard to Recommendation ECB/2013/32 of the European Central Bank of 2 September 2013 to the Council of the European                           Union on the external auditors of the Banco de España(1),                        

Whereas:

(1)The accounts of the European Central Bank (ECB) and of the national central banks of the Eurosystem are to be audited by independent                              external auditors recommended by the Governing Council of the ECB and approved by the Council of the European Union.

(2)The mandate of the current external auditors of the Banco de España expired after the audit for the financial year 2012. It                              is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2013.

(3)The Banco de España has selected KPMG Auditores, S.L. as its external auditors for the financial years 2013 to 2017.

(4)The Governing Council of the ECB recommended that KPMG Auditores, S.L. be appointed as the external auditors of the Banco                              de España for the financial years 2013 to 2017.

(5)It is appropriate to follow the recommendation of the Governing Council of the ECB and to amend Council Decision 1999/70/EC(2) accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Article 1(3) of Decision 1999/70/EC is replaced by the following:

‘3.KPMG Auditores S.L. are hereby approved as the external auditors of the Banco de España for the financial years 2013 to 2017.’.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall take effect on the day of its notification.

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision is addressed to the European Central Bank.

Done at Brussels, 26 September 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

E. Gustas                            

1

OJ C 264, 13.9.2013, p. 1.                           

2

Council Decision 1999/70/EC of 25 January 1999 concerning the external auditors of the national central banks (OJ L 22, 29.1.1999, p. 69).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HAYES CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 3, 
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1998
<CASH>                                          15,770
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,652
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,241
<INVENTORY>                                     32,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,321
<PP&E>                                          48,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                  39,373
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,328
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,710
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           52,914
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           193
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,069)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,328
<SALES>                                        199,612
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,612
<CGS>                                          154,799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  154,799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   389
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,478
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (81,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (4)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (81,123)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (84,606)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (10.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (10.80)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

          - [Docket No. 22-16]

Notice is given that a complaint has been filed with the Federal Maritime Commission (Commission) by GOFORTH & MARTI dba GM BUSINESS INTERIORS, hereinafter “Complainant”, against HSIN SILK ROAD SHIPPING LIMITED, hereinafter “Respondent”. Complainant states that it is a California corporation. Complainant states that Respondent is an entity located in and organized and existing under the laws of Hong Kong, and that it is a non-vessel-common-carrier licensed by the Federal Maritime Commission.

                    Complainant alleges that Respondent violated 46 U.S.C. 41102(c) and 46 CFR 545.4 and 545.5 with regard to assessing fees against containers. The full text of the complaint can be found in the Commission's Electronic Reading Room at                     *https://www2.fmc.gov/​readingroom/​proceeding/​22-16/​.*                     This proceeding has been assigned to Office of Administrative Law Judges. The initial decision of the presiding office in this proceeding shall be issued by July 12, 2023, and the final decision of the Commission shall be issued by January 26, 2024.                

William Cody,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-15030 Filed 7-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 1, 2017

p0125

Order 

Clerk

February 1, 2017

154062

MENARD, INC.,

Petitioner-Appellant, 

v SC: 154062

COA: 325718

MTT: 00-441600; 14-001918-TT

CITY OF ESCANABA,

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). 

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order 

addressing: (1) whether the Court of Appeals exceeded its limited appellate review of a 

decision of the Michigan Tax Tribunal; and, if so, (2) whether the Michigan Tax Tribunal 

may utilize a valuation approach similar to that recognized in Clark Equipment Company 

v Leoni Twp, 113 Mich App 778 (1982). The parties should not resubmit mere 

restatements of their application papers.
#### Paul LaPorte, Respondent, v David Cristman et al., Defendants, and David Holleran, Doing Business as Holleran Home Improvement, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 213]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Robert F. Julian, J.), entered January 3, 2005 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant David Holleran, doing business as Holleran Home Improvement, seeking summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against him.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for injuries he sustained when he fell off a porch roof that collapsed. David Holleran, doing business as Holleran Home Improvement (defendant), contracted with defendants David Cristman and Barbara Cristman to add a second story to their mobile home, and defendant was working as a volunteer on the construction project. Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant seeking summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint against him. Defendant failed to meet his initial burden of demonstrating his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(cf. Williams v O & Y Concord 60 Broad St. Co.,*304 AD2d 570, 571 [2003]; *see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). In any event, plaintiffs submissions raise triable issues of fact whether defendant created the dangerous condition that caused the accident *(see Williams,*304 AD2d at 571), exacerbated the dangerous condition arising from the allegedly faulty construction of the porch roof by David Cristman *(see Dappio v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.,*299 AD2d 310, 311 [2002]) or had constructive notice of the danger*1385ous condition *(see Murphy v Kendig,*295 AD2d 946, 947 [2002]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT


TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of ERF Wireless, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





March 30,
2010





/s/ Richard R.
      Royall
              Richard
      R. Royall
              Chief
      Financial Officer
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1276/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1276/2013 of 6 December 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1276/2013                     

# of 6 December 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing Worldwide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Winzkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Michael WinzkowskiMichael
      WinzkowskiChief
      Executive OfficerDate:
      August 5, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1994-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained  in its Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended  September  30,  1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,755
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,456
<PP&E>                                         3,765,001
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,601,573)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,287,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,828
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,114,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,287,884
<SALES>                                        319,305
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               319,357
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  189,281<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                81,734
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            81,734
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   81,734
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
STATE v. Robert Wayne STANLEY.

No. 376P02-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 9, 2006.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*776The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of May 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of May 2006."