alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Melvin CROOM, as Administrator of the Estate of Bobby Darien Croom v. Marcellus HUMPHREY and Mack Wesley Marrow, Jr.

No. 133P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Ben L. Eagles, Wilson, for Melvin Croom.

Bradley Coxe, Wilmington, for Humphrey & Marrow.

*926*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th day of March 2006 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                       246
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,111
<PP&E>                                           7,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,315
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,000
<BONDS>                                          7,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,518
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,386
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,904
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,395
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,102
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 119
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,352
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,516
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,516
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
WALKER & STATEN v. FLEETWOOD HOMES.

No. 223A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Clayton M. Custer, Greenville, SC, Philip J. Mohr, Winston-Salem, for Fleetwood Homes.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of May 2006 by Plaintiffs to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Memorandum in Support Thereof:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of June 2006."
STATE v. CORDERO.

No. COA06-294.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS257184).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6133
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-92-135-R) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's motion to recuse. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nance , No. CR-92-135-R (W.D. Va. Jan. 16, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Speciman Common Stock Certificate of the Registrant




  
 Exhibit 4.1 

 




 
 Impinj, Inc. 
CS-

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN
DEFINITIONS 
COMMON STOCK 
CUSIP 453204 109 
THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
IS THE OWNER OF 
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF 
COUNTERSIGNED AND
REGISTERED: 
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC 
(Brooklyn,
NY) 
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 
BY 
Impinj, Inc. 
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 
IN WITNESS whereof, the facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly authorized officers.

Dated: 
SECRETARY PRESIDENT 
COMMON STOCK 







 



 
 Stockholders may obtain, upon request and without charge, a statement of the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to
or imposed upon each class or series of shares authorized to be issued and upon the holders thereof from the principal office of the Corporation. 
The following
abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
TEN COM TEN ENT 
JT TEN – as tenants in common 
– as tenants by the entireties 
– as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not
as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT– Custodian 
(Cust)(Minor) 
under
Uniform Gifts to Minors 
Act 
(State) 
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 
For value received,
hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE 
Shares 
of the common stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 
Attorney 
to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full
power of substitution in the premises. 
Dated 
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS
ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: 
THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE
GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
DEANS v. TERRY

No. COA04-495.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 1, 2005.

Certification Date March 21, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
In the Matters of K.H. and P.D.D.

No. 204A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 30, 2006.

Charlotte W. Nallan, for Buncombe County DSS.

Michael Tousey, for Guardian Ad Litem.

Katharine Chester, for Father.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of May 2006 by Guardian Ad Litem Program for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of May 2006."
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5551 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 2, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 11, District of Columbia Official Code, to 

implement the increase provided under the District of 

Columbia Appropriations Act, 2008, in the amount of 

funds made available for the compensation of attorneys 

representing indigent defendants in the District of Columbia courts, and for other purposes. 


smartinez on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

HR 5551 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMPLEMENTATION OF INCREASE PROVIDED IN 

4 FUNDING FOR COMPENSATION OF ATTOR5 NEYS REPRESENTING INDIGENT DEFEND6 ANTS IN DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURTS. 

7 (a) INCREASE IN HOURLY RATE.—Section 11– 

8 2604(a), District of Columbia Official Code, is amended 

9 by striking ‘‘$65 per hour’’ and inserting ‘‘$80 per hour’’. 

10 (b) INCREASE IN CAPS ON TOTAL COMPENSATION

11 PAID FOR PARTICULAR CASES.—Section 11–2604(b), 

12 District of Columbia Official Code, is amended to read as 

13 follows: 

14 ‘‘(b) The compensation to be paid to an attorney ap15 pointed pursuant to this chapter shall not exceed the fol16 lowing maximum amounts: 

17 ‘‘(1) For representation of a defendant before 

18 the Superior Court of the District of Columbia for 

19 misdemeanors or felonies, the maximum amount set 

20 forth in section 3006A(d)(2) of title 18, United 

21 States Code, for representation of a defendant be22 fore the United States magistrate judge or the dis23 trict court for misdemeanors or felonies (as the case 

24 may be). 


smartinez on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

HR 5551 RFS 

1 ‘‘(2) For representation of a defendant before 

2 the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the max3 imum amount set forth in section 3006A(d)(2) of 

4 title 18, United States Code, for representation of a 

5 defendant in an appellate court. 

6 ‘‘(3) For representation of a defendant in post7 trial matters for misdemeanors or felonies, the 

8 amount applicable under paragraph (1) for mis9 demeanors or felonies (as the case may be).’’. 

10 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

11 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

12 respect to cases and proceedings initiated on or after the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 1, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on PRODPC60 with BILLS
STATE v. William Earl COPELAND.

No. 292P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Dorothy Powers, Assistant Attorney General, William David McFadyen, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of June 2005 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of January 2006."
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
 




 
 SPECIMEN SPECIMEN NUMBER SPECIMEN COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY,
LLC BROOKLYN, NY TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR BY: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE Dated: SHARES CS TPI Composites, Inc. COMMON STOCK SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CUSIP 87266J 10 4 This Certifies That:
is the owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF $0.01 PAR VALUE EACH OF TPI Composites, Inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by attorney upon surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or assigned.
This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, and to the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid until
countersigned by the Transfer Agent. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. SECRETARY PRESIDENT 







 



 
 THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY STOCKHOLDER, UPON REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE DESIGNATIONS, RELATIVE RIGHTS,
PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS AND SERIES AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED, SO FAR AS THE SAME HAVE BEEN DETERMINED, AND OF THE AUTHORITY, IF ANY, OF THE BOARD TO DIVIDE THE SHARES INTO CLASSES OR SERIES AND TO DETERMINE AND CHANGE
THE RELATIVE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS OF ANY CLASS OR SERIES. SUCH REQUEST MAY BE MADE TO THE SECRETARY OF THE CORPORATION OR TO THE TRANSFER AGENT NAMED ON THIS CERTIFICATE. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on
the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian. TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties (Cust) (Minor)
JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of under Uniform Gifts to Minors survivorship and not as tenants in common Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute
and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE
OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. Signature(s) Guaranteed By The Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan
Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an approved Signature Guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to SEC Rule 17Ad-15. COLUMBIA PRINTING SERVICES, LLC - www.stockinformation.com
Exhibit 10.1


 





June 30, 2016


 


Kodiak Capital Group, LLC


260 Newport Center Drive


Newport Beach, CA 92660


Attn: Ryan Hodson


 


Re: Termination Notice


 


Dear Mr. Hodson,


 


Pursuant to Section 10.5 of the Equity
Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) entered into by and between you and MYDX,
INC., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”), on or
about February 2, 2016, the Company may terminate the Purchase Agreement at any time by written notice to the Investor.


 


This letter shall serve as a written
notice that the Company is terminating the Purchase Agreement pursuant to the above.


 


Thanks for your attention to this matter.


 


Sincerely:


 


 


MYDX, INC.


 


 


By: Daniel Yazbeck





 









Name:Daniel Yazbeck





Title:Chief Executive Officer





Date:June 30, 2016
STATE v. RIDDLE.

COA06-534.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 7, 2006.

Certification Date November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the Alamance (04CRS51123, 04CRS51126).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit32.1

GLOBAL SIGNAL INC.

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Signal Inc., (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endingJune 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wesley R.Edens, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                     |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/   Wesley R.Edens                                      WesleyR. Edens  Chief Executive Officer

August10, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Global Signal Inc. and will beretained by Global Signal, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Thiscertification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the"Exchange Act"). Such certification will notbe deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to theextent that the registrant specifically incorporates it byreference.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension  Partners  1994-B,  Ltd.'s  balance  sheet and  statement of  operations
contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         1,922
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  85,221
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               87,143
<PP&E>                                         3,811,281
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,786,506)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,111,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          196,280
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     915,638
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,111,918
<SALES>                                        106,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,515
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  60,792<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                12,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            12,283
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   12,283
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, John D. Reedy, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Michael Foods, Inc. (the Company)
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 3, 2004



By:

/s/ John D. ReedyJohn D. Reedy Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
MORRIS v. DEERFIELD EPISCOPAL RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, INC.

COA05-1652.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from Buncombe (03CVS4690)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Lionel Piper, Appellant.

[804 NYS2d 53]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.), rendered April 11, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant made only generalized objections to testimony that store security personnel had been warned to watch him while he was in the store because he had previously been fired from his position as a store employee, defendant failed to preserve his present claim that such testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the evidence was not received for its truth, but to explain why the security personnel focused their attention on defendant, and to complete the narrative of events *(see e.g. People v Tosca,*98 NY2d 660 [2002]). Similarly, this evidence did not violate defendant’s right of confrontation.

Defendant’s remaining contentions, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief, are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review *817these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
STATE v. JOHNSON.

No. COA06-351.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Hertford (02CRS3719).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
STATE v. CARPENTER.

No. COA06-501.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Rowan (04CRS10320).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
David Lloyd HOFECKER v. Jonathan Cooper CASPERSON and Gary Jay Casperson.

No. 92A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 2005.

*490Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 168 N.C.App. 341, 607 S.E.2d 664 (2005), affirming in part and reversing in part an order entered on 10 November 2003 by Judge Donald W. Stephens in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 September 2005.

Harris & Associates, PLLC, by Robert J. Harris, Durham, for plaintiff-appellee.

Brown, Crump, Vanore & Tierney, L.L.P., by O. Craig Tierney, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.