alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013185EN.01000701.xml

| 4.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 185/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 185/7

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2013/351/CFSP

of 2 July 2013

amending Decision 2011/426/CFSP appointing the European Union Special Representative in Bosnia and Herzegovina

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28, Article 31(2) and Article 33 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 July 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/426/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Peter SØRENSEN as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The mandate of the EUSR is to expire on 30 June 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 July 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/426/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Peter SØRENSEN as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The mandate of the EUSR is to expire on 30 June 2015.

| (2) | Decision 2011/426/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2012/330/CFSP (2), provided the EUSR with the financial reference amounts covering the period from 1 September 2011 to 30 June 2013. A new financial reference amount for the period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 should be established. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision 2011/426/CFSP, as amended by Decision 2012/330/CFSP (2), provided the EUSR with the financial reference amounts covering the period from 1 September 2011 to 30 June 2013. A new financial reference amount for the period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 should be established.

| (3) | The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The EUSR will implement the mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union's external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty.

| (4) | Decision 2011/426/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2011/426/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 5(1) of Decision 2011/426/CFSP, the following subparagraph is added:

"The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to the mandate of the EUSR in the period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 shall be EUR 5 285 000.".

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply from 1 July 2013.

Done at Brussels, 2 July 2013.

For the Council

The President

L. LINKEVIČIUS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 188, 19.7.2011, p. 30.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 165, 26.6.2012, p. 66.

2

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5567 

To rescind earmarks designated in the Intelligence Authorization Act for 

Fiscal Year 2008. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2008 

Mr. FLAKE (for himself, Mr. BOEHNER, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, and Mr. 

HOEKSTRA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Select 

Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) 

A BILL 

To rescind earmarks designated in the Intelligence 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESCISSION OF EARMARKS IN INTELLIGENCE 

4 AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008. 

5 No funds may be obligated or otherwise made avail6 able for an item listed in the joint explanatory statement 

7 accompanying the conference report on H.R. 2082 of the 

8 110th Congress (H. Rept. 110–478) in compliance with 

9 clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Rep10 resentatives and rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5567 IH

1 Senate, unless the President certifies that amounts would 

2 be obligated for such item without regard to its appear3 ance in such joint explanatory statement. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, John D. Reedy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
second fiscal quarter of 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2007



/s/ John D. ReedyJohn D. ReedyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
II 

Calendar No. 917 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5631 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JULY 30, 2008 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORPORAL BRADLEY T. ARMS POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1155 Seminole Trail in Char7 lottesville, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office Building’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5631 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. 

5 Arms Post Office Building’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Calendar No. 917 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5631 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postley T. Arms Post Office Building’’. Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ‘‘Corporal Brad- al Service located at 1155 Seminole Trail in 

JULY 30, 2008 

Reported without amendment 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
STATE v. CARIGNAN.

No. COA05-825.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 18, 2006.

Certification Date August 7, 2006.

Appeal from Dare (04CRS50220).

Case without published opinion. No error.
NO. 07-05-0361-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

AUGUST 30, 2006

______________________________

LAQUANNA LASHAE MEANDER, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 50,898-D; HONORABLE DON EMERSON, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant LaQuanna LaShae Meander appeals her drug possession conviction and

accompanying sentence of five years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice. We will affirm the trial court’s judgment and grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

Appellant was indicted for the offense of possession of a controlled substance in a

drug free zone. On September 30, 2005, appellant entered an open plea of guilty to the

offense. Appellant and her counsel acknowledged she received and reviewed written
2

admonishments. Appellant further signed a judicial confession of her guilt to the offense

as alleged in the indictment. Having determined that appellant was mentally competent,

and that her actions in court were freely and voluntarily taken, the trial court accepted

appellant’s plea of guilty. Appellant was the only witness called to testify during the

punishment phase. Following the punishment phase of the trial, the trial court sentenced

appellant to five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal

Justice. 

Appellant’s counsel has filed a brief stating that he has carefully reviewed the record

in this case and concludes there is no reversible error and that the appeal is frivolous. See

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45 (1967). Counsel has also filed a motion to

withdraw and, by letter, informed appellant of her right to file a pro se brief. Johnson v.

State, 885 S.W.2d 641, 646 (Tex.App.–Waco 1994, pet. ref’d). By letter dated April 19,

2006, this court also notified appellant of her opportunity to submit a response to the

Anders brief and motion to withdraw filed by her counsel, granting her until May 19, 2006

to do so. This court’s letter also reminded appellant to contact her counsel if she needed

to review any part of the appellate record to prepare a response. Appellant has not filed

a brief or other response. 

We have independently examined the entire record to determine whether there are

any non-frivolous grounds which might support the appeal. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75 (1988); Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991). We have found

no such grounds. After reviewing the record before us and counsel’s brief, we agree with
3

counsel that the appeal is frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App.

2005).

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted and the trial court’s judgment

is affirmed.

James T. Campbell

 Justice

Do not publish.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7603** 

JASON T. SCOTT , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. WARDEN J. T. SHARTLE, named as FCC Warden; SUSAN MCCLINTOCK, named as USP Warden, Tucson, AZ; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Theodore D. Chuang , District Judge. ( 8:16

- cv - 00364

- TDC )

Submitted : January 17, 2017 Decided: Janaury 20, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jason T. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jason T. Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition without prejudice for failure to exhaust state court remedie s. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right .” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable o r wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debata ble, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Scott has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certif icate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the deci sional process.
DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 569 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 569

     To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize 
           appropriations for sewer overflow control grants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2007

   Mr. Pascrell (for himself, Mr. Camp of Michigan, and Mr. Capuano) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to authorize 
           appropriations for sewer overflow control grants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Water Quality Investment Act of 
2007''.

SEC. 2. SEWER OVERFLOW CONTROL GRANTS.

    (a) Administrative Requirements.--Section 221(e) of the Federal 
Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1301(e)) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(e) Administrative Requirements.--A project that receives 
assistance under this section shall be carried out subject to the same 
requirements as a project that receives assistance from a State water 
pollution control revolving fund under title VI, except to the extent 
that the Governor of the State in which the project is located 
determines that a requirement of title VI is inconsistent with the 
purposes of this section.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--The first sentence of section 
221(f) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 1301(f)) is amended by striking ``this 
section $750,000,000'' and all that follows through the period at the 
end and inserting ``this section $250,000,000 for fiscal year 2008, 
$350,000,000 for fiscal year 2009, $450,000,000 for fiscal year 2010, 
$550,000,000 for fiscal year 2011, $650,000,000 for fiscal year 2012, 
and $750,000,000 for fiscal year 2013''.
    (c) Allocation of Funds.--Section 221(g)(2) of such Act (33 U.S.C. 
1301(g)) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(g) Allocation of Funds.--Subject to subsection (h), the 
Administrator shall use the amounts appropriated to carry out this 
section for fiscal year 2008 and each fiscal year thereafter for making 
grants to municipalities and municipal entities under subsection 
(a)(2), in accordance with the criteria set forth in subsection (b).''.
    (d) Reports.--The first sentence of section 221(i) of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 1301(i)) is amended by striking ``2003'' and inserting ``2010''.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Facts
3. What is the biggest fish in the ocean?

**What is the biggest fish in the ocean?**  The biggest fish in the ocean is the *Rhincodon typus* or **whale shark**. Whale shark (Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary)*Despite their tremendous size and intimidating appearance, whale sharks are commonly docile and approachable. Please keep your distance, giving them the respect and space they deserve.* Whale sharks may grow up to 40 feet and weigh as much as 40 tons by some estimates. Whale sharks longer longer than about 39 feet are uncommon. They have broad, flat heads with short snouts and their backs have an interesting white, yellow, and grey checkerboard pattern. It is unknown how long whale sharks can live, however, scientists believe they can live approximately 60-100 years. Whale sharks are found in all tropical and warm-temperate seas around the world, preferring water temperatures of 68-77° Fahrenheit. Whale sharks eat mostly small organisms like plankton, schooling fish, and squid, which they strain from the water as they swim with their meter-long mouths and specialized teeth.
 More **Information** What are pelagic fish? 12 Shark Facts That May Surprise You   Get **Social** Social
  **Last updated:** 08/24/23 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet of MidAmerican  Energy Company as of March 31, 1999,
and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the three
months  ended March 31,  1999,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
 </LEGEND> 
<CIK>                         0000928576
<NAME>                        MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,619,862
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    202,754
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         253,530
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       292,274
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 173,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,541,895
<COMMON>                                       560,562
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            399,861
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 960,423
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                    31,759
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           760,178
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 191,595
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  170,763
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,277,177
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3,541,895
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      468,248
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           18,634 <F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     398,898
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     398,898
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        69,350
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (942)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 68,408
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       23,590
<NET-INCOME>                                   26,184
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    1,239
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  24,945
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       36,706
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      16,489
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         82,352
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>
     INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE includes all income taxes and is excluded from Total
Operating Expenses above and on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>