alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. GRIFFIN.

No. COA05-807.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 1, 2006.

Certification Date August 21, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS56036, 03CRS56364).

Case without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. BANKS.

No. COA05-1632.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 18, 2006.

Certification Date August 7, 2006.

Appeal from New Hanover (04CRS67046, 04CRS67047).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5685 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to reauthorize the temporary mortgage and rental payments program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 2, 2008 

Mrs. MALONEY of New York (for herself and Mr. MELANCON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to reauthorize the temporary mortgage and rental payments program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mortgage and Rental 

5 Assistance Reauthorization Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) The mortgage and rental assistance pro9 gram was authorized under the Robert T. Stafford 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 5685 IH

1 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 

2 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.) to provide assistance to individ3 uals who have lost a portion of their income and are 

4 having difficulties paying their rents or mortgages. 

5 (2) The Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (Pub6 lic Law 106–390) amended the Stafford Act to end 

7 the program in May 2002. 

8 (3) Following the major disaster declaration re9 sulting from the terrorist attacks in New York on 

10 September 11, 2001, the Federal Emergency Man11 agement Agency allowed the use of funds under the 

12 program to aid residents who were having difficulties 

13 paying their rents or mortgages. 

14 (4) The program should be reauthorized to 

15 allow the Federal Government to provide direct 

16 housing assistance to those who have been displaced 

17 by Hurricane Katrina. 

18 SEC. 3. TEMPORARY MORTGAGE RENTAL ASSISTANCE. 

19 Section 408(c)(1) of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster 

20 Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

21 5174(c)(1)) is amended— 

22 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub23 paragraph (C); and 

24 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol25 lowing: 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 5685 IH

1 ‘‘(B) TEMPORARY MORTGAGE AND RENTAL

2 PAYMENTS.— 

3 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The President is 

4 authorized to provide assistance on a tem5 porary basis in the form of mortgage or 

6 rental payments to or on behalf of individ7 uals and families who, as a result of finan8 cial hardship caused by a major disaster, 

9 certify that they face dispossession or evic10 tion from a residence by reason of a fore11 closure of any mortgage or lien, cancella12 tion of any contract of sale, or termination 

13 of any lease, entered into prior to such dis14 aster. 

15 ‘‘(ii) DURATION OF ASSISTANCE.— 

16 The assistance under this subparagraph 

17 shall be provided for the duration of the 

18 period of financial hardship but not to ex19 ceed 18 months.’’. 

20 SEC. 4. APPLICABILITY. 

21 The amendments made by section 3 shall apply with 

22 respect to a major disaster occurring on or after August 

23 24, 2005. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO . A

- 5463

- 18

OMAR WILSON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

ANGEL R. BECERRIL, NETTY

C. HERNANDEZ, and ANGELO

& SON TRANS CORP

. , MAPFRE/U.S.A. CORP. and

AMERICAN COMMERCE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants

,

and

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY,

Intervenor

- Respondent.

_____________________ __ _ __ __

Submitted April 12, 2021

– Decided May 14, 2021

Before Judges Rothstadt and Mayer.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court

. " A lthough it is posted on the

internet

, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited

. R

. 1:36

- 3.2 A

- 5463

- 18 On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law

Division, Essex County, Docket No. L

- 3798

- 16.

Epstein Ostrove, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Daniel

N. Epstein, on the briefs).

Gurbir S . Grewal, Attorney General, intervenor for the

State of New Jersey (Melissa H. Raksa, Assistant

Attorney General, of counsel; Bryan Edward Lucas,

Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

The court being advised by the parties in the above matter that the issues

in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal is accordingly dismissed with

prejudice and without costs to either party.
# C_2017303EN.01000201.xml

| 14.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 4 September 2017

adopting the Council’s position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2018

(2017/C 303/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314(3) thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Whereas:

| 1. | On 29 June 2017, the Commission submitted a proposal containing the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2018 (1), |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 29 June 2017, the Commission submitted a proposal containing the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2018 (1),

1

| 2. | The Council examined the Commission proposal with a view to defining a position consistent, on the revenue side, with Council Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom of 26 May 2014 on the system of own resources of the European Union (2), and, on the expenditure side, with Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 (3), |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Council examined the Commission proposal with a view to defining a position consistent, on the revenue side, with Council Decision 2014/335/EU, Euratom of 26 May 2014 on the system of own resources of the European Union (2), and, on the expenditure side, with Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 (3),

2

3

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council’s position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2018 was adopted by the Council on 4 September 2017.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 4 September 2017.

For the Council

The President

M. MAASIKAS

---

(1)  COM(2017) 400 final.

1

(2)  OJ L 168, 7.6.2014, p. 105.

2

(3)  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 884.

3

---
In re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust Executed by Patrick HUNT and Ruth Dixon Hunt, to James T. Lee, Trustee, and Emmco, the Mortgage Service Station, Inc., Beneficiary, Dated August 5, 1998 in the Original Principal Amount of $45,600.00 Recorded in Book 1228 at Page 2153 of the Cleveland County, North Carolina, Public Registry. Record Owner: Martina Elizabeth Clark (by virtue of Deed recorded in Book 1302, at Page 935 of aforesaid Registry). Liable on Note: Patrick Hunt and Ruth Dixon Hunt. By: Robert L. Lindsey, Jr., Substitute Trustee.

No. 173P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Martina E. Clark, Pro Se.

John Whitley, for MorEquity, Inc.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 20th day of March 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of April 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

BRIAN JOSEPH SMITH

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 2610 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 236 DB 2018

Attorney Registration No. 68911

(Montgomery County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of the parties’ 

responses to the Court’s rule to show cause dated January 6, 2022, the rule is made 

absolute, and the Petition for Reinstatement is denied. Petitioner is directed to pay the 

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for 

Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofGlobal Green Solutions Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedAugust 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Arnold Hughes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 14thday of October, 2008.                                                                                                                 
|   

ARNOLD HUGHESArnold HughesChief Financial Officer

























---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1




                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                              AS OF MARCH 30, 1999




FULL NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                   PLACE OF INCORPORATION
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LASON SERVICES, INC                                       DELAWARE, USA

LASON SYSTEMS, INC.                                       DELAWARE, USA

LASON INTERNATIONAL, INC.                                 DELAWARE, USA

LASON CANADA COMPANY                                      NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA

COVER-ALL COMPUTER HOLDINGS COMPANY                       NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA

LASON DE MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE C.V.                        MEXICO

DATALOGIC (GRENADA) LTD.                                  GRENADA

OFFSHORE KEYBOARDING CORP.                                BARBADOS

PROMOTORA DE TECHNOLOGIA, S.A. DE C.V.                    MEXICO

IMAGENES DIGITALES, S.A. DE C.V.                          MEXICO

VETRI SOFTWARE INDIA LIMITED                              INDIA
STATE v. Nicholas HOLMES.

No. 283P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 24, 2006.

Jeffrey Evan Noecker, Wilmington, for Nicholas Holmes.

Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of May 2006 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of May 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Thomas Alexander TERRY.

No. 100P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Thomas A. Terry, Pro Se.

Joseph Finarelli, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of February 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th day of February 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
NUMBER 13-16-00303-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

MICHELLE PUENTES, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 36th District Court 

of San Patricio County, Texas

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This matter is before the Court because the clerk’s record has not been filed. On

July 5, 2016, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant’s counsel he had failed to make 

arrangements for payment of the clerk’s record and that unless the request for the clerk’s 

record and proof of the request was provided to this Court within ten days from the date 
2

of receipt of the letter, the matter would be referred to the Court for appropriate action. 

Counsel has failed to file a response and the clerk’s record has not been filed. 

This situation requires us to effectuate our responsibility to avoid further delay and 

to preserve the parties’ rights. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a)(2). Accordingly, this appeal 

is ABATED and the cause REMANDED to the trial court.

Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause notice to be given 

and conduct a hearing to determine: (1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this 

appeal; (2) whether appellant is indigent; (3) whether appellant is entitled to a free

appellate record due to his indigency; and (4) what steps are necessary to ensure the 

prompt preparation of a complete clerk’s record, and shall enter any orders required to 

avoid further delay and to preserve the parties’ rights. 

The trial court shall prepare and file its findings and recommendations, together 

with any orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a 

supplemental clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental 

reporter's record of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record 

and supplemental reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 

thirty days from the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

2

nd day of August, 2016.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                          CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-13917, 333-13751, and 333-18851) pertaining to The SABRE
Group Holdings, Inc. 1996 Long-Term Incentive Plan, 1996 Directors Stock
Incentive Plan, and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, respectively, of our
report dated January 13, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of The SABRE Group Holdings, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10- K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                       ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 31, 1997
exv10w32



 






Exhibit 10.32




Description of Amendment of Stock Option Grant to Robert Blair Dated June 30, 2005




On June 30, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of ESS Technology, Inc. (the
“Company”) approved an amendment to a stock option to purchase 160,000 shares of Company common
stock at an exercise price of $4.12 per share that was granted to Robert L. Blair, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, on June 29, 2005. The amendment partially accelerated the
vesting of the option such that 13/24th of the total number of shares subject to the option were
vested on June 30, 2005 and 1/24th of the total number of shares subject to the option will vest on
the 3rd day of each month thereafter commencing on July 3, 2005, and continuing through May 3,
2006. The Compensation Committee determined that the option, as amended, reflects the original
understanding between Mr. Blair and the Company with respect to the intended vesting schedule of
the option.
Exhibit
32.2





TELETOUCH
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.





OFFICER’S
CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended February 29, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Douglas E. Sloan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his
knowledge:





1. The
Report is in full compliances with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Douglas E.
      SloanDouglas
      E. SloanChief
      Financial OfficerDecember
      23, 2009
Exhibit EX-21

Subsidiaries of Registrant

 

| Subsidiary                                     | State of Organization |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
| Historic Discoveries, Inc.                     | Pennsylvania          |
|                                           |                  |
|                                           |                  |
| Artifact Recovery & Conservation Inc.      | Pennsylvania          |
| (subsidiary of Historic Discoveries, Inc.)     |
|                                           |                  |
|                                           |                  |
| Sea Research Inc.                              | Oklahoma              |
| (subsidiary of Historic Discoveries, Inc.)     |
|                                           |                  |
|                                           |                  |
| Sea Quest, Inc.                                | Oklahoma              |
| (subsidiary of Sea Research, Inc.)             |
|                                           |                  |
|                                           |                  |
| Sovereign Exploration Associates International | Pennsylvania          |
| of Spain, Inc.                                 |
|                                           |                  |
|                                           |                  |
| Lavelle Holdings, Inc.                         | Nevada                |
|                                           |                  |
|                                           |                  |
| LeChameau Explorations Limited                 | Nova Scotia           |

 

----
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the report of Poster Financial Group, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), DawnM. Prendes, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of her knowledge, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 15, 2004 |                      |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                          | /s/ Dawn M. Prendes       |
|                          | Dawn M. Prendes           |
|                          | Senior Vice President and |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

----
HEDINGHAM COMMUNITY ASS'N v. GLH BUILDERS, INC.

No. COA05-1320.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 1, 2006.

Certification Date August 21, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (03CVS14473.

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. EDWARDS.

No. COA05-785.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Cumberland (03CRS71422).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.