alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 16, 2019 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01528-CV 

WONYOUNG KIM, Appellant 

V. 

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-08792 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Reichek 

Opinion by Justice Osborne 

By Order dated June 18, 2019, we abated this appeal to allow further proceedings in the 

district court to effectuate a settlement agreement. 

On September 12, 2019, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss Appeal. We reinstate 

this appeal. The parties report that they have reached a settlement in this appeal of the trial court’s 

denial of appellant Wonyoung Kim’s motion to dismiss pursuant to the Texas Citizens 

Participation Act. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §§ 27.001–27.011. 

The joint motion reflects that the parties have reached an agreement, appellee Commission 

for Lawyer Discipline has filed a nonsuit of the disciplinary case underlying the appeal, and the 

trial court has signed an order granting nonsuit and dismissing all claims with prejudice. The 

parties request that we render judgment effectuating their agreement pursuant to rule of appellate 
 –2– 

procedure 42.1(a)(2)(A). That rule provides that a court of appeals “may dispose of an appeal . . . 

in accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk” 

and may “render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement.” TEX.R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). The 

parties also request that costs be taxed in accordance with their agreement that “each side shall 

bear their own costs in this appeal.” 

We dismiss this appeal. We render judgment in accordance with the agreement of the 

parties, and order that each party bear its own costs of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). 

181528F.P05 

 

/Leslie Osborne/ 

LESLIE OSBORNE 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

WONYOUNG KIM, Appellant 

No. 05-18-01528-CV V. 

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER 

DISCIPLINE, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-08792. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. 

Justices Schenck and Reichek participating. 

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we REINSTATE this appeal. The 

joint motion of appellant Wonyoung Kim and appellee Commission for Lawyer Discipline to 

dismiss this appeal and render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement is GRANTED. 

Pursuant to rule 42.1(a)(2)(A), Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

The parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal. 

Judgment entered October 16, 2019
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation of our reports dated March 16, 2009 and February 1, 2010, relating to our audit of the consolidated financial statements, the financial statement schedules and internal control over financial reporting included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, into the Company’s previously filed registration
statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-134606, 333-123698, 333-61953, 333-92875 and 333-92877) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-134603).














/s/Hein & Associates LLP


Houston, Texas





February 2, 2010
Exhibit 21



Subsidiaries of the Registrant



Allin Corporation wholly owns the following subsidiaries:



|                                       |  |                        |  |                                                          
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                     |  | State of Incorporation |  | Additional Names under which
Subsidiary Conducts Business
|Allin Consulting of Pennsylvania, Inc. |  | Pennsylvania           |  | Allin Consulting                                         
|Allin Corporation of California        |  | California             |  | Allin Consulting                                         
|Allin Interactive Corporation          |  | Delaware               |  | Allin Interactive                                        
|Allin Network Products, Inc.           |  | California             |  |                                                          
|Allin Holdings Corporation             |  | Delaware               |  |                                                          



Except as noted above,
each subsidiary does business exclusively under its corporate name, with or without the corporate indicator.



Exh. 21-A
#### Jeannette Hyslop et al., Respondents, v Catherine Lasusa, Respondent, and Mahopac Central School District et al., Appellants.

[800 NYS2d 849]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants Mahopac Central School District and Catherine White appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Shapiro, J), dated October 8, 2004, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

There are questions of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment (see CPLR 3212 [b]; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Adams, J.P., Crane, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.
| A.   |  Cardtronics previously executed the Treasury Services Terms and Conditions Booklet on July 13, 2004 (the “Booklet”). |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| B.   | Cardtronics and Bank previously executed an Amendment to Treasury Services Terms and Conditions Booklet for ATM Cash Services as of August 2, 2004 (“ATM Cash Services Amendment”) and subsequently amended the ATM Cash Services Amendment as of February 9, 2006. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| C.   | Cardtronics and Bank desire to make an additional amendment to the ATM Cash Services Amendment. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| A.   | All terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the ATM Cash Services Amendment. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| B.   | The ATM Cash Services Amendment is hereby amended by deleting “Four Hundred Million Dollars ($400,000,000)” in the second paragraph under “ATM Cash Services” and inserting “Five Hundred Million Dollars ($500,000,000)” in its place. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| CARDTRONICS, LP                |   |   | BANK OF AMERICA              |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                |   |   |                         |   |
| /s/ Thomas E. Upton       |   |   | /s/ William T. Griffin       |   |
| Name: Thomas E. Upton     |   |   | Name: William T. Griffin     |   |
| Title: Chief Administrative Officer |   |   | Title: Senior Vice President |   |
IN RE A.J.M.

No. COA06-197.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Alamance (99J89).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1218/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1218/2013 of 27 November 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in IV, VIId            and in EU waters of IIa by vessels flying the flag of the Netherlands         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1218/2013                     

# of 27 November 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for herring in IV, VIId and in EU waters of IIa by vessels flying the flag of the Netherlands

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    /s/ John J. DeeJohn J. DeeChief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Thomas Lloyd BROWN.

No. 437P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

Thomas Lloyd Brown, Pro Se.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Kristy M. Newton, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 18th day of August 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."
STATE v. FITZGERALD.

No. COA05-732.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Johnston (03CRS53978).

Case without published opinion. No error.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-4076

_____________________________

JOHN NICHOLAS HILL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

February 12, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, RAY, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

John Nicholas Hill, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
McDOWELL EX REL. McDOWELL v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. COA06-536

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Durham (05CVS4025).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 288/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 288/2013 of 25 March 2013 concerning the suspension of the authorisations of the            preparation of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi (NCIMB 40112/CNCM I-1012) as provided for by Regulations (EC) No 256/2002, (EC)            No 1453/2004, (EC) No 255/2005, (EC) No 1200/2005, (EC) No 166/2008 and (EC) No 378/2009 (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 288/2013                     

# of 25 March 2013

# concerning the suspension of the authorisations of the preparation of *Bacillus cereus* var. *toyoi* (NCIMB 40112/CNCM I-1012) as provided for by Regulations (EC) No 256/2002, (EC) No 1453/2004, (EC) No 255/2005, (EC) No 1200/2005,                        (EC) No 166/2008 and (EC) No 378/2009                     

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1399 of 17 August 2015 concerning the denial of authorisation of the preparation                                 of Bacillus toyonensis (NCIMB 14858T) (formerly Bacillus cereus var. toyoi NCIMB 40112/CNCM I-1012) as a feed additive for                                 cattle for fattening, rabbits for fattening, chickens for fattening, piglets (weaned), pigs for fattening, sows for reproduction                                 and calves for rearing and the revocation of the authorisations of the preparation of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi (NCIMB 40112/CNCM                                 I-1012) as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening and rabbit breeding does, amending Regulations (EC) No 256/2002, (EC)                                 No 1453/2004, (EC) No 255/2005 and (EC) No 1200/2005 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 166/2008, (EC) No 378/2009 and Implementing                                 Regulation (EU) No 288/2013 (Text with EEA relevance).
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Pierre Duhamel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



Dated: May 11, 2005



/s/    PIERRE DUHAMELPierre Duhamel Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd




This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

HYBIR, INC., Appellant

v.

VEEAM SOFTWARE CORPORATION, Appellee

______________________

2022

- 1443, 2022

- 1444

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s . IPR2020

- 01039, IPR2020

- 01040.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

S ETH O STROW

, Meister Seelig & Fein LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by R OBERT F EINLAND

.

B YRON L EROY P ICKARD

, Sterne Kessler Goldstein &Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by D ANIEL S. B LOCK

, S TEVEN P APPAS

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is Case: 22-1443 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 03/14/2023O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE

, C LEVENGER

, and T ARANTO

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

March 14, 2023
Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court Case: 22-1443 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 03/14/2023
|                                      |  |             
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 |  | EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, JOHN J. HANNAN, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|      |  |                      
|----- |  | ---------------------
|      |  | /s/    JOHN J. HANNAN
|Name: |  | John J. Hannan       
|Date: |  | August 6, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                        1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         318,435
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  303,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,199
<INVENTORY>                                     26,463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               694,412
<PP&E>                                         508,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                 274,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,579,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          441,210
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,711
<OTHER-SE>                                     799,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,579,520
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,418,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,082,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,293
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                430,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            312,350
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   312,350
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.86
        


</TABLE>
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.2

GLOBAL SIGNAL INC.CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GlobalSignal Inc., (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June  30,  2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Steven G. Osgood, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                    |
|--|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ Steven G.OsgoodSteven G. OsgoodExecutive VicePresident andChief FinancialOfficer

August  8,  2006

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Global Signal Inc. and will be retained by GlobalSignal Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

This certification accompaniesthis Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemedfiled by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘ExchangeAct’’). Such certification will not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that theregistrant specifically incorporates it byreference.

----