alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CARL DEWAYNE SCOTT

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3483

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed July 5, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jennie M. Kinsey , Judge

.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee , for Appellant.

C arl Dewayne Scott, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., OSTERHAUS and WINSOR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         85,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                85,841
<CGS>                                           62,114
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,114
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,364
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,812
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,834)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,298)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,536)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,536)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.65)
        

</TABLE>
Cherry

436, 440-41, 254 P.3d 631, 634 (2011) (identifying three factors that a plaintiff must satisfy in order to add a new defendant after the statute of limitations has run); see NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 841, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Parraguirre

, J.

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge Upson Smith/Reno Curriden, Arneson and Anderton Van Walraven & Harris, Chtd. RanaIli & Zaniel, LLC/Reno Erickson Thorpe & Swainston, Ltd. Whitehead & Whitehead Law Offices of Kenneth E. Lyon, III M. Jerome Wright Law Offices of Melissa P. Harris Glogovac & Pintar Paul Kapitz Emerson & Manke, LLP Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF 2 NEVADA

(0) 1947A en
Kozoman v. Smith, et al.

No. 330P06-2

Supreme Court of North Carolina

August 17, 2006

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of August 2006 by Plaintiff for "Petition for Rehearing":

> Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of August 2006.
CHRISTOPHER JONAS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 13

- 3505

_______ ______________________/

Opinion filed July 7, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Aymer L. Curtin, Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger and Colleen D. Mullen,

Assistant Public Defender s , Tallahassee , fo r Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Justin Chapman and Donna A. Gerace, Assistant Attorney s General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE

, MARSTILLER

, and RAY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

10:00 a.m., Friday, July 15, 2022.

# PLACE: 

The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 504 North, Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street entrance).

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                         The Commission will consider and act upon the following in open session:                         *Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC and Butler employed by Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC,*                         Docket Nos. LAKE 2019-0023, 2019-0122, 2019-0361. (Issues include whether the Judge erred in concluding that the operator violated standards when it failed to immediately de-energize equipment and stop work when it encountered high methane levels, whether the violations were significant and substantial, and whether a supervisor was liable for individual penalties.)                    

                        Pursuant to the Commission's COVID-19 Workplace Safety Plan, in-person attendance shall be limited to persons participating in the decisional process (                        *e.g.,*                         Chair and Commissioners, Commission employees providing support for the meeting). Non-participating individuals may listen to the meeting by calling the phone number listed below in this notice.                    

Any person attending this meeting who requires special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

 Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

# PHONE NUMBER FOR LISTENING TO MEETING:

 1-(866) 236-7472, Passcode: 678-100.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: July 1, 2022.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2022-14454 Filed 7-1-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
STATE v. DRIVER.

No. COA05-1193.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Carteret (05CRS50120).

Case without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. CAMPBELL.

COA06-388.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Scotland (04CRS53400, 04CRS53031).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21

                LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF MCII HOLDINGS (USA), INC.

Each subsidiary is 100% owned by its respective parent company except as noted.

   
   Motor Coach Industries International, Inc. (Delaware)
        Transportation Manufacturing Operations, Inc. (Delaware)
           BusLease, Inc. (Delaware)
           Commercializadora Mexicana de Autobuses, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (10%)
           Hausman Bus Sales, Inc. (Delaware)
           MCI Acceptance Corp. (Delaware)
           MCIL Holdings, Ltd. (Canada)
                Motor Coach Industries Limited (Canada)
                       Frank Fair Industries Ltd. (Manitoba)
           Mexicana de Autobuses, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (10%)
           Motor Coach Industries, Inc. (Delaware)
           Motor Coach Industries-China, Inc. (Delaware)
                Nanjing Starley Transportation Company Limited (China) (70%)
           TMO Holdings of Canada, Ltd. (Canada)
           Transit Bus International, Inc. (Delaware)
                Custom Assets Corp. (California)
                Greyhound Overseas Services, Inc. (Virgin Islands)
                Transport Technology Corporation (Arizona)
           Universal Coach Parts, Inc. (Delaware)
                Universal Coach Parts Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (98%)
   *Dina Autobuses, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (99.99%)
        Autopartes Hidalguenses, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (99.99%)
        Carrocera Sahagun, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (98%)
      **MCII Buses (USA), Inc. (Delaware)
    

    *Became a subsidiary on January 31, 1997.
   
    **Incorporated as a subsidiary on April 17, 1997.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


                APPALACHIAN BANCSHARES, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE



         The following tabulation presents the calculation of basic and fully
diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997
and 1996.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 1998              1997              1996
                                                             ------------      -----------       ------------

     <S>                                                     <C>               <C>               <C> 
     BASIC:
     Reported net income (loss)..........................    $  1,208,231      $ 1,017,766       $    516,736
                                                             ============      ===========       ============
     Earnings (loss) on common shares....................    $  1,208,231      $ 1,017,766       $    516,736
                                                             ============      ===========       ============
     Weighted average common shares
       outstanding - basic...............................       1,166,425        1,154,990          1,136,000
                                                             ============      ===========       ============
     Earnings (loss) per common share from
       continuing operations - basic.....................    $       1.04      $       .88       $        .45
                                                             ============      ===========       ============
     Net income (loss)...................................    $       1.04      $       .88       $        .45
                                                             ============      ===========       ============


     DILUTED:
     Reported net income (loss)..........................    $  1,208,231      $ 1,017,766       $    516,736
                                                             ============      ===========       ============
     Earnings (loss) on common shares....................    $  1,208,231      $ 1,017,766       $    516,736
                                                             ============      ===========       ============
     Weighted average common shares
       outstanding - diluted.............................       1,220,976        1,162,206          1,136,000
                                                             ============      ===========       ============
     Earnings (loss) per common share from
       continuing operations - diluted...................    $        .99      $       .88       $        .45
                                                             ============      ===========       ============
     Net income (loss)...................................    $        .99      $       .88       $        .45
                                                             ============      ===========       ============
</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Alonza WADE.

No. 200P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Alonza Wade, Pro Se.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of April 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*56"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
Administrative Offices Civil and Family Division Criminal Division Jury Office (512) 854-9457 (512) 854-9457 (512) 854-9420 (512) 854-9669 fax: 854-4744 fax: 854-9549 fax: 854-4566 fax: 854-4457 

## Velva L. Price Travis County District Clerk Travis County Courthouse Complex P.O. Box 679003 Austin, Texas 78767-9003

November 22, 2016

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle Third Court of Appeals P.O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711-2547

RE: 03-16-00713-CV; D-1-GN-14-002456

Dear Mr. Kyle,

A clerk’s record in cause number, D-1-GN-14-002456 and Court of Appeals number 03-16-00713-CV

, styled, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON VS. JAMES C. GUZMAN, GLORIA A. GUZMAN, AND AISD , was due in your office November 21, 2016. This office has not received payment, affidavit of inability to pay, or a designa tion of clerk’s record as of today, November 22, 2016.

Sincerely,


# i|vàÉÜ|t V{tÅuxÜá

Travis County Deputy District Clerk Civil Division Court Clerk assigned to Honorable Orlinda Naranjo P.O. Box 679003 Austin, Texas 78767 512-854-8956
STATE v. Alexander C. POLKE.

No. 412A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 9, 2006.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, William Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of March 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Alexander Charles Polke) shall have up to and including the 7th day of April 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of March 2006."
Ludovicus N. KEYSER, a/k/a Ludo Keyzer v. AMERLINK, LTD. and Richard Spoor.

No. 593P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Barry Nakell, for Ludovicus N. Keyzer.

Steven C. Lawrence, Fayetteville, for Amerlink & Spoor.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of October 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
In the Matter of E.F.S., Jr.

No. 285P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 26, 2006.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th day of May 2006 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of May 2006."
Exhibit
32.1





TELETOUCH
COMMUNICATIONS, INC.





OFFICER’S
CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS,
INC. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Robert M. McMurrey, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.           The
Report is in full compliance with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/Robert M.
      McMurreyRobert
      M. McMurreyChief
      Executive OfficerJanuary
      14, 2010
GEORGIA 

#10 #22 2.7% $1,472 #14 #6 #7

$15.8 B SPENT IN 2.5% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $8.7 B CONTRACT 131,696 NUMBER $7.1 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 6% Research and

Developme

Service: d

 53% 

nt: 7% 

 35%

54%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Active Duty: 5

l

1%

27%

2%

63%

Supplies an

Equipment:

By Service 

Army

25%

Navy/Marines

12%

Air Force

Other Defense

9%

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 10%

Nationa

Guard: 1

Civilian: 

Allocations, By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

11%

Air Force

23%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Lockheed Martin $3.3 B

Georgia Tech Research Corp. $496.5 M

General Dynamics $240.1 M

Meggitt $163.5 M

Weeks Marine $145.2 M

International Auto Logistics $135.9 M

Northrop Grumman $133.0 M

Alberici-Mortenson, JV $123.8 M

J. Walter Thompson U.S.A. $113.2 M

Scientific Research Corp. $106.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$9.6

FY14 FY16

$8.7

$6.7 $6.7 $6.9 $6.6 $5.8 $5.3

FY13 FY15 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

$7.1 BILLION 131,696

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Muscogee 21,694 4,576 381 742 27,393

Houston 3,540 15,164 1,239 1,255 21,198

Liberty 15,548 2,555 568 137 18,808

Richmond 11,576 3,598 586 1,819 17,579

Chatham 4,488 1,181 1,728 542 7,939

Cobb 297 1,363 2,648 3,324 7,632

Lowndes 4,644 533 74 262 5,513

Camden 2,456 2,413 0 ND ND

Clayton 48 538 487 2,199 3,272

Dougherty 313 2,236 103 129 2,781

38 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020 39

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

GEORGIA 

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Cobb

Fulton

Houston

Chatham

Richmond

Camden

Chattahoochee

Gwinnett

Liberty

Glynn

(M = millions, B = billions)

$3.6 B 

$896.1 M

$816.8 M

$567.7 M

$521.7 M

$363.3 M 

$245.0 M

$231.2 M

$214.4 M

$145.2 M

Houston

Muscogee

Liberty

Richmond

Chatham

Camden

Cobb

Lowndes

Dougherty

Clayton

$1.4 B

$1.2 B

$1.1 B

$1.0 B

$425.4 M

$320.4 M

$320.2 M

$306.8 M

$178.9 M

$127.3 M

Chattahoochee

Fulton

Cobb Gwinnett

Richmond

Houston

Liberty

Glynn

Chatham

Camden

Clayton

Muscogee

Lowndes

Cobb

Richmond

Houston

Chatham

Camden

Glynn

Dougherty
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CLIFFORD TAYLOR GREEN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 397 WAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of February, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
NC BOARD OF PHARMACY v. COMMISSION.

No. 673A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 1, 2006.

Carson Carmichael, III, M. Denise Stanford, Anna Baird Choi, Matthew W. Sawchak, Paul K. Sun, Jr., Julia F. Youngman, Stephen D. Feldman, Raleigh, for NC Board of Pharmacy.

Stephen T. Smith, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Solicitor-General, Raleigh, for Rules of Review Commission, et al.

Michael J. Tadych, C. Amanda Martin, Raleigh, Susan C. Winckler, Vice President, for American Pharmacists, et al.

Charlotte A. Mitchell, Stanford D. Baird, William G. Scoggin, Daniel J. Palmieri, Raleigh, Ann M. Anderson, Research Triangle Park, for NC Citizens for Business, et al.

Amy E. Pickle, for NC Coastal Federation, et al.

Robert R. Marcus, Angela L. Little, Greensboro, Dale J. Atkinson, Julia C. Works, Evanston, IL, for NABP.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of June 2006 by Defendants for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendants (Rules of Review Commission, et al.) shall have up to and including the 21st day of July 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of June 2006."
STATE v. WHITE.

No. COA05-1272.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Edgecombe (02CRS2937, 02CRS50268, 02CRS50269)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; No error in part.