alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation. 

# ACTION:

Notice of order adjusting the Standard Foreign Fare Level index (Docket OST-05-20332). 

# SUMMARY:

The Department revises the Standard Foreign Fare Level (SFFL) to reflect the latest available fuel and non fuel cost changes experienced by carriers, as required by 40 U.S.C. 41509(e). 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. John Kiser or Ms. Diane Z. Rhodes, Pricing & Multilateral Affairs, Division (X-43, Room 6424), U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-1065. 

Dated: August 17, 2005. 

Paul L. Gretch, 

Director, Office of International Aviation. 

[FR Doc. 05-16673 Filed 8-22-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Delward SHARPE.

No. 327P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

Mark Montgomery, Durham, for Kenneth D. Sharpe.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of June 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 20th day of June 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                             Kroll Inc. Subsidiaries

     Kroll Holdings, Inc. ("KHI") (Delaware) (100%)

     Kroll Associates, Inc. (Delaware) (100%) (conducts business in Arizona
     under the name "Kroll Consulting, Inc.")

     Kroll Associates (Asia) Limited (Hong Kong) (50%; 50% by KHI)

     Kroll Associates U.K. Limited (England) (100%)

     Kroll International, Inc. (Delaware) (100%)

     Kroll Associates International Holdings, Inc. (100%)

     Kroll Lindquist Avey Company (Nova Scotia) (100% owned by L.A.M.B.
     Acquisition, Inc. and L.A.M.B. Acquisition II, Inc., which are 100% owned
     by Kroll)

     Kroll Information Services, Inc. (Delaware) (100%)

     Kroll Specialists of America, Inc. (Oklahoma) (100%)

     Kroll Laboratory Specialists, Inc. (Louisiana) (100%)

     Kroll Buchler Phillips Ltd. (U.K.) (100%)

     Kroll Background America, Inc. (Tennessee) (100%) (conducts business in
     Tennessee under the name "The Search is On")

     Kroll Ontrack Inc. (Minnesota) (100%)

     Kroll Zolfo Cooper LLC (New Jersey) (100%)

     Kroll Zolfo Cooper Holdings, Inc. (New Jersey) (100%)

     Kroll Zolfo Cooper Management LLC (New Jersey) (100%)

     Kroll Factual Data Corp. (Colorado) (100%)

     All other subsidiaries together do not meet the definition of a Significant
     Subsidiary.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 11/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 11/2013 of 9 January 2013 amending the representative prices and additional import            duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 892/2012 for the 2012/13 marketing            year (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 11/2013                     

# of 9 January 2013

# amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Implementing                        Regulation (EU) No 892/2012 for the 2012/13 marketing year (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 75/2013 of 25 January 2013 derogating from Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 as regards                                 the application of representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector and repealing                                 Implementing Regulation (EU) No 892/2012 fixing the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products                                 in the sugar sector for the 2012/2013 marketing year.
CHURCH v. BARE.

COA06-323.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from Ashe (04CVS430)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Amend No. 5 to Executive Employment Agreement



 






EXHIBIT 10.51




AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO

EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

BY AND BETWEEN

SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND GERHARD E. KURZ




     This Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement by and between Seabulk International, Inc., a
Delaware corporation formerly known as Hvide Marine Incorporated (the
“Company”), and Gerhard
E. Kurz (“Executive”), dated as of April 18, 2000, as amended (the “Agreement”), is entered into as
of the 28th day of June, 2005.



     WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement in certain
respects ;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and the mutual benefits provided
in the Agreement, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and
Executive hereby amend the Agreement as set forth below:



     1. Section 8.8(c) of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and the following shall be
substituted therefor:




     “(c) If Executive’s employment with the Company terminates prior to the payment
of incentive awards under the Company’s Management Annual Incentive Compensation
Plan (“MAICP”) for the 2005 calendar year (determined without regard to any payment
made under the MAICP for the six-month period ending on June 30, 2005 (the “Interim
2005 Bonus Payment”)), pay Executive, within five (5) days after the date of such
termination of employment, a lump sum cash payment equal to the excess, if any, of
(1) 100% of the 2005 maximum incentive award specified for Executive under the MAICP
multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the number of days
Executive was employed by the Company during calendar year 2005 and the denominator
of which shall be 365, over (2) the amount of the Interim 2005 Bonus Payment paid to
Executive by the Company.”



     2. As so amended, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment to be duly executed
and delivered as of the day and year first written above.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	 

	 	 
	/s/ Gerhard E. Kurz

	 	/s/ Alan R. Twaits
	 

	 	 
	GERHARD E. KURZ

	 	By: Alan R. Twaits, Sr. Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Business
Objects S.A. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of Operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          93,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,770
<INVENTORY>                                        187
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               146,226
<PP&E>                                          31,467
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 167,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,054
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,311
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   167,465
<SALES>                                         59,766
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,766
<CGS>                                           10,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,083
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (533)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,989
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,096
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,893
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,893
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, GREGORY W. HUNT, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



| |  |                       |  | 
| |  | --------------------- |  | 
| |  |                      
| |  | /s/ GREGORY W. HUNT   |  | 
| |  | Name: Gregory W. Hunt |  | 
| |  | Date: August 8, 2012  |  | 



61
**Exhibit 6.1 **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report on Form 40-F of Virginia Mines Inc. for  the year ended February 28, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

  Date: May 29, 2006

*/s/ Andre Gaumond*  André Gaumond  President and Chief Executive Officer

  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other  document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature  that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained  by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or  its staff upon request.
James Leslie JAVUREK v. Sharon Dunigan JUMPER.

No. 191A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

James L. Javurek, Pro Se.

Sharon D. Jumper, Pro Se.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 6th day of April 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
# L_2012121EN.01004401.xml

| 8.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 121/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 121/44

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 351/2012 of 23 April 2012 implementing Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards type-approval requirements for the installation of lane departure warning systems in motor vehicles

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 110 of 24 April 2012
  )

On page 27, the Appendix to Annex II should be replaced by the following:

‘Appendix

Visible lane marking identification

| 1. | For the purpose of the test procedures referred to in points 2.2. and 2.5. of Annex II, the test lane width shall be greater than 3,5 m. |
| --- | --- |

1.

| 2. | The visible lane markings identified in Table 1 are assumed to be white, unless otherwise indicated in this Appendix. |
| --- | --- |

2.

| 3. | Table 1 shall be used for approval in accordance with points 2.2. and 2.5. of Annex II to this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Table 1

Identified visible lane markings

PATTERN

COUNTRY

WIDTH

Left edge lane marking

Centre line

Right edge lane marking

Left edge lane marking

Centre line

Right edge lane marking

Lane width

Lane width

Definition of lane width for the purpose of this Regulation

20 cm

10 cm

20 cm

5 m

20 m

12 m

4 m

SPAIN

3 m

20 cm

10 cm

20 cm

SWEDEN

9 m

BELGIUM

30 cm

20 cm

30 cm

2,5 m

10 m

20 cm

15 cm

20 cm

2 m

UNITED KINGDOM

Motorway (*)

7 m

UNITED KINGDOM

Dual Carriageway

10 cm or 15 cm or 20 cm

15 cm

10 cm or 15 cm or 20 cm

2 m

7 m

PATTERN

COUNTRY

WIDTH

Left edge lane marking

Centre line

Right edge lane marking

Left edge lane marking

Centre line

Right edge lane marking

UNITED KINGDOM

Single Carriageway

(speed limit > 40 mph)

10 or 15 or 20 cm

10 or 15 cm

10 or 15 or 20 cm

3 m

6 m

DENMARK

30 cm

15 cm

30 cm

5 m

10 m

NETHERLANDS

15 cm

10 cm

15 cm

3 m

9 m

ITALY

Secondary and Local

12 or 15 cm

10 or 12 cm

12 or 15 cm

3 m

4,5 m

ITALY

Motorway

25 cm

15 cm

25 cm

4,5 m

7,5 m

ITALY

Main

25 cm

15 cm

25 cm

3 m

4,5 m

IRELAND

15 cm

10 cm

15 cm

4 m

8 m

PATTERN

COUNTRY

WIDTH

Left edge lane marking

Centre line

Right edge lane marking

Left edge lane marking

Centre line

Right edge lane marking

12 cm

12 cm

12 cm

3 m

GREECE

9 m

20 cm

15 cm

20 cm

4 m

PORTUGAL

10 m

20 cm

10 cm

20 cm

3 m

FINLAND

9 m

12 cm

12 cm

12 or 25 cm

4 m

GERMANY

secondary

8 m

15 cm

15 cm

30 cm

6 m

GERMANY

Motorway

12 m

22,5 cm

15 cm

22,5 cm

3 m

39 m

FRANCE

Motorway (*)

10 m

13 m

PATTERN

COUNTRY

WIDTH

Left edge lane marking

Centre line

Right edge lane marking

Left edge lane marking

Centre line

Right edge lane marking

FRANCE

Highways

(4 lanes or 2 × 2 lanes)

22,5 and 37,5 cm

15 cm

22,5 cm

3 m

3 m

3,5 m

10 m

FRANCE

(other roads)

10 or 12 cm

15 or 18 cm

3 m

3 m

3,5 m

10 m

(*) Excepted certain zones (e.g. slip road, lane for slow vehicles, etc.).’

---
STATE v. BOYD

No. COA05-223

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from New Hanover (03CRS1598, 03CRS1601).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. CLARK.

No. COA06-379.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Lenoir (05CRS50931)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Elder, Beales and Senior Judge Annunziata 

ROXANNE POTTER 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0102-11-3 PER CURIAM 

 JUNE 7, 2011 

ITT NIGHT VISION AND 

 INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY 

 OF NORTH AMERICA 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Roxanne Potter, pro se, on brief). 

 (Linda D. Frith; Frith Anderson & Peake, PC, on brief), for 

appellees. 

 Roxanne Potter appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission. She 

contends the commission (1) overlooked the fact that complex regional pain syndrome/reflex 

sympathetic dystrophy (CRPS/RSD) affects her speech, but not her memory; (2) overlooked the 

fact that CRPS/RSD begins with trauma; (3) overlooked the fact that medical evidence from 

Dr. Marc Swanson established her trauma occurred in ITT Night Vision’s (employer) parking 

lot; (4) overlooked the fact that medical evidence from Dr. James Chandler established her 

trauma was caused by stepping into a hole in employer’s parking lot; (5) overlooked the 

significance of the evidence from Breland M. Joines, PA-C and Dr. David Keilman that she had 

shooting pain indicating nerve damage; (6) overlooked medical evidence from Dr. Swanson that 

CRPS/RSD resulted from nerve damage she sustained in the employer’s parking lot on 

December 11, 2008; (7) overlooked the fact that employer’s witness was the “wrong man”; 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 
- 2 - 

(8) erred in failing to properly enter evidence she provided into the record; (9) erred in failing to 

consider photographs she labeled with arrows pointing to the location where her accident 

occurred; (10) erred in overlooking the disabilities appellant suffers as a result of her 

CRPS/RSD; (11) erred in overlooking evidence from the United States Environmental Protection 

Agency detailing the condition of employer’s parking lot; (12) overlooked evidence from United 

States Attorney John Brownlee detailing the many problems involved with conducting an 

investigation of employer; (13) failed to consider excerpts from the book she authored entitled 

How to Understand a Person with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome/ Reflex Sympathetic 

Dystrophy; and (14) was partial and discriminated against her because she has CRPS/RSD. We 

have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without 

merit.1

 Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. 

See Potter v. ITT Night Vision, VWC File No. VA000-0004-7064 (Nov. 30, 2010). We 

dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisiona

process. 

l 

See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

Affirmed. 

 1

 Because we are affirming the commission’s decision on the merits, we need not address 

employer’s motion to dismiss for failure to comply with Rule 5A:25.
Exhibit 10.2


 


CUBIST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


AMENDED AND RESTATED 2002 DIRECTORS’ STOCK OPTION PLAN


 


This
FIRST AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to the
Amended and Restated 2002 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), of Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is
adopted by resolution of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”)
pursuant to a written consent in lieu of a meeting of the Board dated as of August 2,
2005 (the “Effective Date”).  Effective from and after the Effective Date,
the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.                                       Section 8(c) of
the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


 


“(c)    No Holder shall be permitted
to effect payment of any amount of the Option Price of the Shares to be
purchased by executing and delivering to the Company a promissory note.”


 


2.                                       The
following sentence is hereby added to the end of Section 17 of the Plan:


 


“Notwithstanding
the foregoing, no repricing of outstanding Options shall be permitted under the
Plan without first receiving approval from the holders of Stock representing
not less than a majority of the then outstanding Shares.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   8-MOS                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             JAN-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,179                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,767                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       299                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,651                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,678                       0
<PP&E>                                             913                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     121                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,417                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,907                       0
<BONDS>                                          8,600                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          2                       0
<COMMON>                                             8                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,900                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,417                       0
<SALES>                                         34,713                  13,008
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,713                  13,008
<CGS>                                           19,381                   8,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,381                   8,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                28,462                   2,473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 575                      18
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (13,705)                  2,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (5,509)                    836
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,196)                  1,254
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (8,196)                  1,254
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .93                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .93                       0
        

</TABLE>