alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned officer of Empire
Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.  This certification is
provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a
part of the Report or “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.











Date:  March
      31, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Sandra
      KahnSandra
      Kahn,Chief
      Financial Officer
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 31/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 31/2013 of 17 January 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 31/2013                     

# of 17 January 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 January 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1339/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1339/2013 of 13 December 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1339/2013                     

# of 13 December 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE of North Carolina v. Andrea Antionette BRYANT.

No. 117A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 13, 2006.

Ann Stone, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State.

Daniel R. Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Andrea Bryant.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 10th day of March 2006 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 13th day of March 2006."
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Income Fund I (the Fund), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Manager and of the Fund, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Fund filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
 
 
 
 /s/ Richard K Brock
 Richard K Brock
 Chief Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 (Principal Financial Officer)
 August 13, 2004
ACCEPTED 03-14-00416-CV 7359330 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/13/2015 4:41:30 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James R. Tolonen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Business Objects S.A. on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Business Objects S.A. By:
    
    /s/ James R. TolonenJames R. TolonenChief Financial Officer andSenior Group Vice President
exv10w2



 






EXHIBIT 10.2




AMENDMENT TO

OPTION AWARD AGREEMENTS




     WHEREAS, under the Company’s 1993 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”), William E.
Macaulay (“Optionee”), a non-employee director of Pride International, Inc. (the “Company”), was
awarded options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to option award
agreements (the “Option Award Agreements”) with the following grant dates:


January 2, 2003

January 2, 2002

July 17, 2001;

July 25, 2000;

July 14, 1999; and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has authorized an amendment to
the plan to permit the exercise of stock options during their full term; and



     WHEREAS, the stock options outstanding under the Option Award Agreements are fully exercisable
by their terms; and



     WHEREAS, pursuant to the authorization of the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee of the Board has approved the amendment of the Option Award Agreements to permit the
exercise of stock options during their full term as set forth below;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Option Award Agreements are hereby amended such that any and all stock
options outstanding as of May 12, 2005 pursuant to the Option Award Agreements shall be exercisable
for the full original ten-year tem of such stock options.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Optionee has hereunto set his hand and the Company has caused these
presents to be executed in its name and on its behalf, effective as of May 12, 2005.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	

OPTIONEE

 	 
	Date: June 3, 2005 	/s/ William E. Macaulay
 	 
	 	William E. Macaulay 	 
	 	 	 
	 
	 	

PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 	 
	Date: May 12, 2005 	By:  	/s/ Paul A. Bragg
 	 
	 	 	Paul Bragg 	 
	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
# Commission Implementing Decision of 7 November 2013 adopting a fourth updated list of sites of Community importance for the            Macaronesian biogeographical region (notified under document C(2013) 7340) (2013/734/EU) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 7 November 2013

# adopting a fourth updated list of sites of Community importance for the Macaronesian biogeographical region

# (notified under document C(2013) 7340)

# (2013/734/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2372 of 26 November 2015 adopting a fifth update of the list of sites of Community                                 importance for the Macaronesian biogeographical region (notified under document C(2015) 8215).
BIO-MEDICAL v. NCDHHS.

No. 549A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 24, 2007.

Lee M. Whitman, Raleigh, Sarah M. Johnson, Winston-Salem, for Bio-Medical Applications.

Thomas R. West, Pamela A. Scott, William R. Shenton, Raleigh, Chad W. Essick, for Total Renal Care.

Amy Y. Bason, Angel E. Gray, Assistant Attorney Generals, for NCDHHS.

S. Todd Hemphill, Diana E. Ricketts, Raleigh, for Health Systems Management.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of January 2007 by Plaintiff for Leave to File a Reply Brief:

"Motion Allowed. By order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of January 2007."
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 663/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 663/2013 of 10 July 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for Common sole in areas VIIIa            and VIIIb by vessels flying the flag of Spain         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 663/2013                     

# of 10 July 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for Common sole in areas VIIIa and VIIIb by vessels flying the flag of Spain

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 39/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available to EU vessels for                              certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are not subject to international negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 July 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 1.
STATE v. HILLIARD.

No. COA06-75.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (04CRS110490, 05CRS9816)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Timmy Wayne SPEIGHT.

No. 491PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Patricia A. Duffy, Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney Generals, William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

Margaret Creasy Ciardella, Hampstead, for Speight.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States vacating the judgment of this Court and remanding this cause for further consideration in light of its decision in *Washington v. Recuenco,* ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2546, 165 L.Ed.2d 466 (2006), the following order is entered:

The State shall have 20 days from the filing of this order to file and serve a supplemental brief with this Court, limited to the questions of whether there was error in this case pursuant to *Washington v. Recuenco* and, if so, whether any error can be found to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. *State v. Speight,*359 N.C. 602, 614 S.E.2d 262 (2005). Defendant may file its brief in response within 20 days after service of the State's brief upon him. Each side will be allowed up to 20 minutes of oral argument.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 17th day of August, 2006.
STATE of North Carolina v. Douglas PAGE, Jr.

No. 135P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Douglas Page, Jr., Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th day of March 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
IN RE K.J.

No. COA05-1192.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Guilford, (02J762).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-20008

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ RODRIGUEZ, also known as Jose Luis RodriguezRodriguez, also known as Jose Luis Rodriguez, also known as Jose L Rodriguez,

also known as Jose Rodriguez-Rodriguez, also known as Joe Rodriguez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-461-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, GARZA, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Rodriguez

Rodriguez (Rodriguez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rodriguez has not

filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 15, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-20008 Document: 00511382194 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
No. 10-20008

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-20008 Document: 00511382194 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/15/2011
ASHER v. WHITTAKER.

No. COA05-1572.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 18, 2006.

Certification Date August 7, 2006.

Appeal from Harnett (04CVS1436).

Case without published opinion. Dismissed as interlocutory.
Exhibit 31.2



OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, J. Kernan Crotty, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Teletouch Communications, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |                                                       
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: April 19, 2005 |  | /s/ J. Kernan Crotty                                  
|                     |  | J. Kernan Crotty President and Chief Financial Officer
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 7198** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ,
Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.

LUIS HERNANDEZ

- ESPINOZA, a/k/a Raphael Lopez, a/k/a Rafael Lopez ,
Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. James C. Dever, III , Chief District Judge. ( 7:09

- cr
- 00112

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : December 17, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Luis Hernandez

- Espinoza, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Severo, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished o pinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Luis Hernandez

- Espinoza appeal s from the district court order
denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a

sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no

rev ersible error. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 4B1.1(b) (2009)

. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED