alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-05-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,282
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,051
<INVENTORY>                                     71,625
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,800
<PP&E>                                          51,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,674
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,473
<BONDS>                                         76,912
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,413
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,035
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,610
<SALES>                                         61,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,812
<CGS>                                           33,162
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     9
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    935
<INCOME-TAX>                                       337
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       598
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 135 (Friday, July 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15240]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Commission public business meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Friday, July 22, 2022, 12:00 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: Meeting to take place virtually and is open to the public 
via livestream on the Commission's YouTube page: https://www.youtube.com/user/USCCR/videos.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angelia Rorison: 202-376-8371; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b9c9ccdbd5d0dad8dfdfd8d0cbcaf9cccadadacb97ded6cf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6d1d180f01040e0c0b0b0c041f1e2d181e0e0e1f430a021b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Government in 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding 
a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month. This 
business meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted real-time 
transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in 
English) on Friday, July 22, 2022, is https://www.streamtext.net/player?event=USCCR. Please note that CART is text-only translation that 
occurs in real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.

Meeting Agenda

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Business Meeting
    A. Presentations by State Advisory Committee Chairs on Released 
Reports and Memorandums
    B. Discussion and Vote on Advisory Committee Appointments
    C. Discussion and Vote on 2023 and 2024 Topics for USCCR Reports
    D. Management and Operations
    <bullet> Staff Director's Report
III. Adjourn Meeting

    Dated: July 13, 2022.
Angelia Rorison,
USCCR Media and Communications Director.
[FR Doc. 2022-15240 Filed 7-13-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017064DE.01011602.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 10.3.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 64/116 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 168/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 15. Januar 2013 über die Genehmigung und Marktüberwachung von zwei- oder dreirädrigen und vierrädrigen Fahrzeugen

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 60 vom 2. März 2013](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2013_060_R_TOC)
)

Auf Seite 98, Anhang I, Fahrzeugeinstufung, Spalte 3 („Gemeinsame Einstufungskriterien“) zu Klasse L5e:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(5) | Masse in fahrbereitem Zustand < 1 000 kg und“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(5) | Masse in fahrbereitem Zustand ≤ 1 000 kg und“. |

Auf Seite 99, Anhang I, Fahrzeugeinstufung, Spalte 3 („Gemeinsame Einstufungskriterien“) zu Klasse L6e:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(6) | Masse in fahrbereitem Zustand < 425 kg und“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(6) | Masse in fahrbereitem Zustand ≤ 425 kg und“. |

---
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-5026 PCL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in 06-CV-144,

Judge Marian Blank Horn. ON MOTION Before BRYSON, Circuit Judge. ORDER Upon consideration of the United States' unopposed motion for a 60-day extension of time, until August 5, 2009, to file its brief, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

# JUN 11 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk _FILED U.S. COUn OF APPEALS THE FEDERAL CRCUIT" JUN 1 1 2009 Jtu• abituttla CLERK Date

cc: Michael J.Cook, Esq. Leslie Cayer Ohta, Esq. s19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,098
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (67)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         111,996
<DEPRECIATION>                                (47,573)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  87,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         25,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    87,791
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,807
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,452
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,788
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,788
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,788
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.65



 







Exhibit 10.65




Form of Designation of Beneficiary




STATE AUTO FINANCIAL CORPORATION


OUTSIDE DIRECTORS RESTRICTED SHARE UNIT PLAN




Designation of Beneficiary



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Participant’s Name:

	 	 	 	SSN:	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 





Pursuant to the provisions of the State Auto Financial Corporation Outside Directors Restricted
Share Unit Plan (the “Plan”) permitting designation of a beneficiary or beneficiaries by a
participant, I hereby designate the following person or persons (which may be an entity(ies) or a
trust) as primary and secondary beneficiaries of any benefits under the Plan payable by reason of
my death:







	 	 	 
	Primary Beneficiary:
	 	 
	 

	 	 





	 	 	 
	Name:
	 	 
	 

	 	 





	 	 	 
	Relationship:
	 	 
	 

	 	 





	 	 	 
	Address:
	 	 
	 

	 	 





	 	 	 
	Social Security Number, if known:
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 











	 	 	 
	Secondary Beneficiary:
	 	 
	 

	 	 





	 	 	 
	Name:
	 	 
	 

	 	 





	 	 	 
	Relationship:
	 	 
	 

	 	 





	 	 	 
	Address:
	 	 
	 

	 	 





	 	 	 
	Social Security Number, if known:
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 








I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO REVOKE OR CHANGE ANY BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION. I HEREBY REVOKE ALL PRIOR
DESIGNATIONS (IF ANY) OF BENEFICIARIES AND SECONDARY BENEFICIARIES.



The Company shall pay all sums payable under the Plan by reason of my death to the primary
beneficiary, if he or she survives me, and if no primary beneficiary survives me, then to the
secondary beneficiary. If no named beneficiary survives me, then the Company shall pay all amounts
in accordance with the terms of the Plan. NOTE: Unless you provide otherwise in completing this
designation, the Company shall pay all sums payable to more than one beneficiary equally to the
living beneficiaries.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	 
	Date of this Designation

	 	Signature of Participant
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5674 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the Bureau of Prisons 

to provide secure storage areas in prison facilities for employees authorized to carry a firearm. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 1, 2008 

Mr. MEEK of Florida (for himself, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, and Mr. ELLSWORTH) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to require the Bureau of Prisons to provide secure storage areas in prison 

facilities for employees authorized to carry a firearm. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Correctional 

5 Workers Safety Act of 2008’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5674 IH

1 SEC. 2. SECURE FIREARMS STORAGE IN PRISON FACILI2 TIES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 303 of title 18, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘§ 4049. Secure firearms storage in prison 

7 ‘‘The Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall ensure 

8 that each prison facility provides a secure storage area for 

9 all persons employed by the Bureau at that facility who 

10 are authorized to carry a firearm.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

12 at the beginning of chapter 303 of title 18, United States 

13 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

14 item: 

‘‘4049. Secure firearms storage in prison.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
STATE v. Tyrone JOHNSON.

No. 53P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, William Graham, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of July 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Plain Error Review N.C.G.S. 7A-28(B)(1)(2)(3)(4)":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of August 2006."
IN RE D.L.B.

No. COA06-493.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Cabarrus (04J18, 04J19, 04J20).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
JOYCE v. DaimlerCHRYSLER MOTOR CORP.

No. COA05-1380.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Watauga (04CVS309).

Case without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 21
- 0050 4
- CV

In re Texas Department of Family and Protective Services

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator has filed a petition for writ of ma ndamus complaining of the trial court ’ s contemp t order issued in the underlying proceeding. This Court thereafter received a copy of the
tria l court ’ s amended further order s , which withdr ew an d superseded the contempt order at issue

. See In re Kellogg Bro wn & Root, Inc ., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex.2005) (orig. proceeding) ( “ A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to e xist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings.” ); see also In re Estate of Hastings , No. 07

- 16

- 00053

- CV, 2017 WL 115193 6, at *3 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo Mar. 23, 2017, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (“[A]n amended order generally supersedes and nullifies the order it amends.”).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. We also lift our stay of the wit hdrawn and s up e rseded contempt order.

_______________________ ___________________ Chari L. Kelly , Justice
Before Justices Baker, Kelly, and Smith
Filed: November 16 , 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,824
<SECURITIES>                                    15,347
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                       304
<INVENTORY>                                        224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   443
<PP&E>                                           3,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                     670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,924
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,413
<SALES>                                         13,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,629
<CGS>                                            1,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,738
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  19
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,491
<INCOME-TAX>                                       831
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. GOUGE.

No. COA06-564.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Yancey (03CRS50912, 03CRS50929, 03CRS50930, 03CRS50931).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Angela Deborah LEWIS.

No. 558PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

Paul M. Green, Durham, for Lewis.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States vacating the judgment of this Court and remanding this cause for further consideration in light of its decision in *Davis v. Washington,* 547 U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 165 L.Ed.2d 224 (2006), the following order is entered:

Defendant shall have 20 days from the filing of this order to file and serve a supplemental brief with this Court, limited to the question of whether there was error in this case pursuant to *Davis v. Washington. State v. Lewis,*360 N.C. 1, 619 S.E.2d 830 (2005). The State may file its brief in response within 20 days after service of the defendant's brief. Each side will be allowed up to 20 minutes of oral argument.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 17th day of August 2006.
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 280/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 280/2013 of 22 March 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 62/2006 concerning the technical specification            for interoperability relating to the telematic applications for freight subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail            system (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 280/2013                     

# of 22 March 2013

# amending Regulation (EC) No 62/2006 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the telematic                        applications for freight subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system                     

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the interoperability                           of the rail system within the Community(1), and in particular Article 6(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Article 4b of Commission Regulation (EC) No 62/2006 of 23 December 2005 concerning the technical specification for interoperability                              relating to the telematic applications for freight subsystem of the trans-European conventional rail system(2) provides that the European Railway Agency has to update the documents referred to in Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 62/2006                              on the basis of change requests that are validated before 13 May 2012.

(2)The Commission has received European Railway Agency recommendation ERA/REC/06a-2012/INT of 24 July 2012 to update Annex A                              to Regulation (EC) No 62/2006 in order to refer to the technical documents which have been amended in accordance with the                              change management process (‘Final Baseline 5.2’).

(3)Regulation (EC) No 62/2006 should therefore be amended accordingly.

(4)The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established in accordance                              with Article 29(1) of Directive 2008/57/EC,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Annex A to Regulation (EC) No 62/2006 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 March 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

## ANNEXU.K.

### “ANNEX A

#### **LIST OF ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS**

**List of mandatory specifications**

1

OJ L 191, 18.7.2008, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 13, 18.1.2006, p. 1.
BAME v. PRIORITY TRUSTEE SERVICES OF NC, LLC.

No. COA05-322.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Rowan (04CVS1873).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
W i l l p a rti c i p a te a s a m e m b e r o f th e e n b a n c c o u rt p u rs u a n t t o 3 d . C i r. I. O .P . 9 .6 .4

. 1 U N IT E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

_____________ No. 08-3650

_____________ In re: GL OB AL

I NDUSTRI AL

TECHNOL OGI ES, I

NC., et al., Debtors

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- HA RTF ORD A CCI DENT AN D I ND EMNI TYCO MPA

NY ; F I RST STA TE I

NSU RA NC E CO MPA

NYCO ; TWI N C I TYF I RE I

NSU RA NC E CO MPA

NY ; CENTURY I

NDEMNI TY COMPANY, as suc cessor to CI GNA Spec ialty

Company , fo rm e rl y kn ow n a s Ca lif

or nia Un ion Ins ur anc e Com

pa ny ; WEST CH EST ER F I RE I NSU RA NC E CO MPA

NY , f or its e lf and fo r I nte rn a tio na l In s ur an c e C o m

p an y ( n o wkn o w na s T IG In s ur an c e C o mp an y) (b y op e ratio n o f n ov a tio n a ll r ig hts and ob lig a tio ns un de r t

he po lic ie s have be en tra

nsfer red f rom International I nsuranc e Co. to Westchester F ire Insuranc e Co.); NATI ONAL

UNI ON F I RE I

NSURANCE COMPANY OF PI TTSBURGH, PA; I

NSURANCE COMPANY OF TH E STATE OF PENNSYL VANIA; L EXI NGTONI

NSURANCE COMPANY; AMERI CAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, and any other e ntities related to Amer ican International Group, Inc. that eng ag ed in business transa ctions with the Reorg anizing De btors,

Ap pe lla nts P RES ENT : M CKEE , Ch i e f J u d g e , S CI RI CA, AM BRO, F UENTE S , S M I TH, F I S HER, C H A G A R E S , J O R D A N , V A N A S K IE , a n d N Y G A A R D , C ir c u it J u d g e s . 1 A M E N D E D O R D E R* A m aj o ri ty

o f t h e a ct i v e j u d ges h av i n g v o t edfo r r eh ea ri n g en banc in t he a bo ve a pp e a l, i t i s o rd er edth atth e C l erk

o f t h i s C o urt l i s tth e ab o v e c as e f o r r eh ea ri n g en banc at the conve nience of the Court
. BYTHE COURT, /s/ Theodore A . McKe e DATED: June 15, 2010 Chief J udg e crg/cc: All counse l of rec ord
EXHIBIT 10.20

                             OPTION WRITTEN NOTICE

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.20

                             OPTION WRITTEN NOTICE


DATE:  JULY 28, 2005

BEIJING DI-KA-WO SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT CORP. ("DI-KA-WO") -- ATTN:  HU, FANG
AND YU, BO

WHEREAS:

Hu, Fang and Yu, Bo own 100% of DI-KA-WO;
Di-Ka-Wo owns 49% of Beijing QuickNet Telecommunication Corp.


Gentlemen:


The Undersigned hereby elects to exercise the option according to the "Share
Purchase Agreement" between Beijing Quicknet Telecommunication Corp. (hereafter
refers to as "QuickNet"), Hu, Fang and Yu, Bo, and China Mobility Solutions,
Inc. (previously known as Xin Net Corp. Hereafter refers to as "CHMS") on Feb.
18, 2004 to purchase 49% of ownership of QuickNet from Hu, Fang and Yu, Bo for
four million US Dollars.  Di-Ka-Wo agrees to transfer 49% ownership of QuickNet
to Beijing ShiJi RongChuang Technology Development Corp. immediately.  CHMS will
make the payment of 2 million US Dollars to Di-Ka-Wo or its appointed party on
or before September 30, 2005.  CHMS will make the payment of the rest 2 million
US Dollars to Di-Ka-Wo or its appointed party on or before December 31, 2005.


Very truly yours,


/s/ Angela Du
---------------------------
Angela Du, President of
China Mobility Solutions, Inc.


Accepted by:


/s/ Hu, Fang
---------------------------
Hu, Fang, President of
Beijing Di-Ka-Wo Software Development Corp.

<PAGE>



/s/ Yu, Bo
----------------------------
Yu, Bo, Director of
Beijing Di-Ka-Wo Software Development Corp.