alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w01



 






Exhibit 10.01




AMENDMENT
TO OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION




     On February 10, 2005, the board of directors of West Corporation amended the compensation plan
for members of its board of directors. As amended, directors will receive $45,000 annually to
attend and participate in teleconferences, board meetings and audit committee meetings. Directors
will receive an additional $12,000 for the annual financial review meeting of the board of
directors. Directors will also be granted options to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock at each
Annual Meeting. Travel expenses for directors will be reimbursed.
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant. By:
        /s/ John R. MaleName: John R. MaleTitle: Chairman of the Board andChief Executive OfficerBy:
        /s/ C. Keith SwaneyName: C. Keith SwaneyTitle: President, Chief OperatingOfficer and Treasurer
 Date: May 6, 2005
STATE v. NIX.

No. COA05-1122.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 2, 2006.

Certification Date May 22, 2006.

Appeal from Vance (98CRS3500, 98CRS3501, 98CRS3502, 98CRS4750).

Case without published opinion. Remanded for resentencing in part, dismissed in part.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5359 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on aluminum lamp-holder 

housings containing sockets. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on aluminum 

lamp-holder housings containing sockets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALUMINUM LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS CON4 TAINING SOCKETS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.31 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 lamp-holder housings of aluminum, containing sockets) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2011’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5359 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (1)

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  the  following  certification  is  being  made to
accompany  Catskill  Litigation  Trust's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended September 30, 2005;

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Catskill  Litigation  Trust (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Joseph E.  Bernstein,  Acting Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
          as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                           /s/ Joseph E. Bernstein
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Joseph E. Bernstein
                                           Title: Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                           Date:  November 11, 2005

     (1)  A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906
          has been provided to Catskill Litigation Trust and will be retained by
          Catskill Litigation Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
          Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
```
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY                                                OF INCORPORATION
----------                                                ----------------
<S>                                                       <C>
Vision 21 Managed Eye Care of Tampa, Bay, Inc.            Florida
Vision 21 Management Services, Inc.                       Florida
Vision 21 of Southern Arizona, Inc.                       Florida
Vision 21 of Sierra Vista, Inc.                           Florida
Vision Twenty-One Managed Eye Care, IPA, Inc.             New York
Vision Twenty-One Surgery Center, Ltd.                    Florida LP
Vision Twenty-One Surgery Center-Largo, Ltd.              Florida LP
Vision Twenty-One Eye Surgery Centers, Inc.               Florida
Vision Twenty-One Refractive Center, Inc.                 Florida
Vision Twenty-One of Wisconsin, Inc.                      Wisconsin
Vision Insurance Plan of America, Inc.                    Wisconsin
Eye Surgery Center Management, Inc.                       Florida
LSI Acquisition, Inc.                                     New Jersey
MEC Health Care, Inc.                                     Maryland
Vision Twenty-One Physician Practice Management Company   Florida
     Vision Twenty-One Eye Laser Centers, Inc.            Florida
BBG-COA, Inc.                                             Delaware
     BVC Administrators, Inc.                             New Jersey
     Block Vision, Inc.                                   New Jersey
          UVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.      New York
          CHVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.     New York
          MVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.      New York
          WVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.      New York
          FVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.      New York
          BHVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.     New York
          The Block Group of New York, Inc.               New York
          BBG Independent Practice Association, Inc.      New York
          VCA Independent Practice Association, Inc.      New York
          Block Vision of Texas, Inc.                     Texas
</TABLE>
ZUBAIDI v. EARL L. PICKETT ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. COA05-1582.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 15, 2006.

Certification Date September 5, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (03CVS3123).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# L_2014074DE.01007101.xml

| 14.3.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 74/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 74/71

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses 2013/250/EU der Kommission vom 21. Mai 2013 zur Festlegung der Umweltkriterien für die Vergabe des EU-Umweltzeichens für Sanitärarmaturen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 145 vom 31. Mai 2013
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 145 vom 31. Mai 2013

Auf Seite 22 bis 25, in allen Tabellen der Anlage von Nummer 1.8.1.1 bis 1.8.1.5:

anstatt:

„Silikon“

muss es heißen:

„Silizium“.

---
STATE v. POLLARD.

No. COA05-36.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS54242)

Case without published opinion. Remanded for resentencing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,514,670
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,627,987
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,860,794
<PP&E>                                       5,181,167
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,104,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             191,677,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,226,608
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,067
<OTHER-SE>                                  73,706,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               191,677,124
<SALES>                                     58,959,195
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           118,023,253
<CGS>                                       55,926,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              101,773,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            29,046,932
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,084,891
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (17,196,476)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (17,196,476)
<DISCONTINUED>                              11,127,191
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             (1,885,512)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (7,954,797)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.55)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.3
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Thomas B. Specketer, Vice President and Controller of MidAmerican Energy Company (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: May 4, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Thomas B. Specketer
 Thomas B. Specketer
 Vice President and Controller
 (chief financial officer)
STATE OF DELAWARE


CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT


OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION





The corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware does hereby certify:





FIRST:That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of





THL-SC Bedding Company





resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said corporation for consideration thereof.  The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:





RESOLVED,that the Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be amended by changing the Article thereof numbered “FIRST” so that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:





The name of the Corporation is “Bedding Holdco Incorporated” (the “Corporation”).





SECOND:That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of the Board of Directors, the stockholders of said corporation, acting by written consent in lieu of a special meeting in accordance with Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, voted the necessary number
of shares as required by statute in favor of the amendment.





THIRD:That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF,said corporation has caused this certificate to be signed this _________ day of August, 2009.





By:  /s/ Stephen G. Fendrich


Name:  Stephen G. Fendrich


Title:    President
STATE v. HOLDER.

No. COA05-927.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Harnett (05CRS50807).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129745 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DETROIT BUILDING AUTHORITY, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff/Cross Defendant- Justices Appellant, 

and 

CITY OF DETROIT,

 Intervening Plaintiff/Counter 

 Plaintiff/Cross PlaintiffAppellee, 

v SC: 129745 

 COA: 253479 

WAYNE COUNTY TREASURER, Wayne CC: 02-234701-CH

 Defendant/Cross Defendant/ 

 Counter Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

MICHIGAN FINANCIAL 

INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., 

 Intervening Defendant/Cross 

 Plaintiff/Counter DefendantAppellee. _________________________________________/ 

By order of March 27, 2006, the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in In re 

Petition by Treasurer of Wayne County for Foreclosure (Docket No. 129341). On order 

of the Court, the case having been decided on May 23, 2007, 478 Mich 1 (2007), the 

application is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting 

leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we 

REINSTATE the order of the Wayne County Circuit Court setting aside the foreclosure 

sale and quieting title to the property in the plaintiff. The foreclosure sale of publicly 

owned property is prohibited. MCL 211.78g(1). Contrary to the Court of Appeals 

majority's conclusion, the Wayne County Treasurer had reason to know that the property 

was publicly owned because there is no dispute that the plaintiff Detroit Building 
 _________________________________________ 

 

 

2 

Authority, which was incorporated by the intervening plaintiff City of Detroit, MCL 

123.951, was the owner of record and had filed both a deed and an affidavit of property 

transfer notifying the county that the property was tax exempt. 

MARKMAN, J., concurs and states as follows: 

I concur in the decision to reverse the Court of Appeals; however, I would do so 

on different grounds. It is undisputed that the city of Detroit was the taxpayer of record 

in the local assessor’s office at the time of the foreclosure. Because the city's interest was 

“identifiable by reference to . . . [t]ax records in the office of the local assessor,” MCL 

211.78i(6)(c), the Wayne County Treasurer was required to send notice by certified mail. 

MCL 211.78i(2). Moreover, because the city's interest was “reasonably identifiable” 

under the records of the local assessor, merely posting a foreclosure notice and publishing 

such notice in a newspaper was not constitutionally adequate. Mennonite Bd of Missions 

v Adams, 462 US 791, 798-799 (1983). Accordingly, the Court of Appeals erred by 

concluding that the treasurer "afforded the City the required due process.” 

l0925 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2007 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,328
<SECURITIES>                                     3,949
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,406
<INVENTORY>                                     16,956
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,905
<PP&E>                                          28,554
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 130,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,575
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           134
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   130,092
<SALES>                                         47,791
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,791
<CGS>                                           33,310
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,834
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,274
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,243
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,087
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,156
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,156
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

MICHAEL DEWAYNE AGNEW
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 2744

[ August 25, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; William L. Roby , Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 2019

- CF

001453 A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Mara C. Herbert, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, T allahassee, and Rachael Kaiman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., G ROSS and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
STATE v. HERNDON.

No. COA05-724.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Robeson (01CRS54284).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
BALD HEAD ASSOCIATION v. Peter Charles CURNIN.

No. 270P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Peter Charles Curnin, Pro Se.

Stuart L. Egerton, G. Grady Richardson, Jr., for Bald Head Association.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 18th day of May 2006 for Writ of Supersedeas, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 18th day of May 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review *673the order of the Superior Court, Brunswick County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
Stock Purchase Agreement



 Exhibit 10.5 
  
 PURCHASE AGREEMENT 
  
 This Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of June 16, 2005 between Safeco Corporation (“Safeco”) and James W.
Ruddy, Executive Vice President and General Counsel (“Executive”). 
  
 Recitals 
  
 A. Executive
is retiring from Safeco after over 30 years of service, including serving as general counsel since 1989. 
  
 B. Safeco believes it is appropriate to assist Executive in liquidating his Safeco shares in an efficient manner. 
  
 Agreement 
  
 Purchase and Sale of Shares. 
  
 1. Initial Purchase. During the three-month period from Executive’s retirement date, Safeco will purchase up to
that number of shares of Executive’s Safeco common stock as set forth on Exhibit A to this Agreement. The purchase price will be the average closing share price for Safeco’s common stock over a 30 day period that will start on the date
Executive indicates to Safeco his desire to sell and end on the purchase date (less the exercise cost of shares acquired through option exercise). 
  
 2. Subsequent Purchase. If requested by the Executive, Safeco will purchase an additional number of shares that are designated as ISO shares on
Exhibit B to this Agreement on any date Executive chooses up through the end of the month following the one-year anniversary of the initial purchase date. In each case, the purchase price will be the closing share price for Safeco’s common
stock on the date of purchase. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	Safeco Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Allie Mysliwy




			
		
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Operations



			
	
	James W. Ruddy
		
	Name:	 	 /s/ James W. Ruddy












 Share Purchase - Exhibit A 
  

						
	 	  	 Maximum
 share purchase
 from J. Ruddy

	  	 Estimated
 proceeds to
J. Ruddy 2


	 Simultaneous buy/sell of stock option shares 1, 3
	  	246,839	  	$	3,330,817
	 Registered shares, other than those previously acquired in 2005 via incentive stock option exercise
	  	10,662	  	$	516,254
	 	  	
	  	
	

	 Total
	  	257,501	  	$	3,847,071

  

	1	Includes 16,271 incentive stock option shares that Mr. Ruddy may prefer to retain via an exercise and hold stock option transaction. 

  

	2	Estimated values are based on the closing price as of April 18, 2005 which was $48.42.


  

	3	Estimated proceeds excluding the 16,271 incentive stock option shares that may be exercised
in a buy/hold transaction is $3,145,925. 










 Share Purchase - Exhibit B 
  

			
	 	  	 Maximum
 shares that
 may be
 purchased
 from J. Ruddy


	 Shares previously acquired in 2005 via incentive stock option exercise
	  	9,096
	 Shares that may be acquired by J. Ruddy via incentive stock option exercise
	  	16,271
	 	  	

	 Total
	  	25,367