alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5729 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5729

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to provide comprehensive health care to children of 
    Vietnam veterans born with Spina Bifida, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 8, 2008

Mr. Ellsworth introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs to provide comprehensive health care to children of 
    Vietnam veterans born with Spina Bifida, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Spina Bifida Health Care Program 
Expansion Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVISION OF COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS TO CHILDREN OF VIETNAM VETERANS BORN WITH SPINA 
              BIFIDA.

    (a) Provision of Comprehensive Health Care.--Section 1803(a) of 
title 38, United States Code, is amended by striking ``such health care 
as the Secretary determines is needed by the child for the spina bifida 
or any disability that is associated with such condition'' and 
inserting ``health care under this section''.
    (b) Authority To Provide Domiciliary Care.--Section 1803(c)(1)(A) 
of title 38, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``domiciliary 
care,'' after ``nursing home care,''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
shall apply with respect to care furnished after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OEPRATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,899
<SECURITIES>                                        23
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,749
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,516
<INVENTORY>                                     19,453
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,991
<PP&E>                                          30,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,465
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,971
<SALES>                                        190,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               190,413
<CGS>                                          131,644
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  131,644
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,798
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,615
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,352
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,264
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (194)
<CHANGES>                                        (360)
<NET-INCOME>                                       710
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7158

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTONIO FRANKLIN CUNNINGHAM, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-85-P) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antonio Franklin Cunningham, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Antonio Franklin Cunningham appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Cunningham , No. CR-90-85-P (W.D.N.C. June 29, 1998). We deny Appellant’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.19

MAYOR                                                                 COUNCILMEN
Kent Eknes                                                         Jerry Burgers
CITY ADMINISTRATOR        [CITY OF ROCK VALLEY LOGO]                 Dale Kooima
Tom Van Maanen                                                       Mark McGill
CITY CLERK                                                    Kevin Van Otterloo
Judy Van't Hul                                                      Chad Van Zee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 1507 Main Street - PO Box 100 - Rock Valley, IA 51247 - Phone: (712) 476-5707






      April 2, 2004


      To Whom It May Concern:

           For American Pallet Leasing Company Project in Rock Valley, Iowa


      The Rock Valley Economic Development Corporation has made a financial
      commitment to American Pallet Leasing Company to attract this new industry
      to Rock Valley. We have purchased 40 acres and are working on the
      development of this property as it relates to American Pallet Leasing Co.
      RVEDC will provide the 12 acres that is needed for this project and the
      City of Rock Valley will provide the infrastructure needed to fully
      develop this property.

      This property in Westview Business Park identified for the American Pallet
      Leasing project is valued at $600,000. Along with the infrastructure costs
      for this land being developed, there is an additional $127,000 cost for
      dirt work and site preparation which RVEDC will assume for this project.
      This outstanding industrial property will be fully developed and ready for
      building construction by APL.

      The City of Rock Valley and the Rock Valley Economic Development
      Corporation looks forward to working with American Pallet Leasing Company
      on this outstanding project. We are commited to the future growth and
      progress in this area. American Pallet Leasing will be a major project for
      this community and we are committed to assist them in every way possible.

      Sincerely,

      /s/ James Vander Velde

      James Vander Velde
      Development Director




                            www.cityofrockvalley.com
LUCAS v. LL BLDG. PRODUCTS.

No. COA05-1431.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 18, 2006.

Certification Date August 7, 2006.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #235306).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Donald Wayne McGEE.

No. 60P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Linda B. Weisel, Raleigh, for Donald W. McGee.

Richard Slipsky, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 7th day of February 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional *892question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of February 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5771 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for a project or program named for 

an individual then serving as a Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, or Senator of the United States Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2008 

Mr. MCCAUL of Texas (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. CAMPBELL of California, Mr. 

FLAKE, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. GINGREY, Mr. HENSARLING, 

Mr. ISSA, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. KIRK, Mr. KLINE of Minnesota, Mr. LATTA, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, 

Mr. WALBERG, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. SALI, Mr. REICHERT, Ms. FOXX, Mr. 

POE, and Mr. MACK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds for a project or program 

named for an individual then serving as a Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, or Senator of the United 

States Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN FEDERAL FUNDS. 

4 No Federal funds may used for a project or program 

5 named for an individual then serving as a Member, DeleVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:18 Apr 12, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5771.IH H5771

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5771 IH

1 gate, Resident Commissioner, or Senator of the United 

2 States Congress. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Nos. 1D18-1083

 1D18-2998

(Consolidated for Disposition)

_____________________________

ROGER WILLIAM NELSON,

Former Husband,

Appellant,

v.

ISOLDE U. NELSON, Former Wife,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Ana Garcia, Judge.

September 5, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jerry L. Rumph, Jr. and Jennifer L. Sweeting of Sweeting & 

Rumph, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Jeffrey P. Whitton, Panama City, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6746
CLARENCE DUKE REYNOLDS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GEORGE P. DODSON, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-94-452-R) Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 4, 1996 Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Duke Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Reynolds v. Dodson , No. CA-94-452-R (W.D. Va. Mar. 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT
      15**





**AWARENESS
      LETTER OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








MidAmerican
      Energy Company


Des
      Moines, Iowa





We
      have
      made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
      Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited consolidated interim financial
      information of MidAmerican Energy Company and subsidiary for the three-month
      and
      six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, as indicated in our report
      dated August 4, 2006; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no
      opinion on that information.





We
      are
      aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, is incorporated by
      reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-110398 and 333-134163 on
      Form S-3.





We
      also
      are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
      Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement
      prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by
      an
      accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.








/s/
      Deloitte & Touche LLP





Des
      Moines, Iowa


August 4,
      2006
STATE of North Carolina v. Toby Ofield LOVE. State of North Carolina v. Ronnie Love. State of North Carolina v. Tino Love.

No. 353P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Peter Wood, for Toby Love.

Irving Joyner, Durham, for Ronnie Love.

John Keating Wiles, Raleigh, for Tino Love.

Judith Tillman, Iain M. Stauffer, Assistant Attorney Generals, Mabel Y. Bullock, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

**ORDER**

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of July 2006 by Defendant (Ronnie Love) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
102 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

TENNESSEE 

#34

$3.2 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#48

0.7% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$462

PER RESIDENT 

#32

$2.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#28

26,752 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#33 

$1.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Construction: 20%

Equipment: 28%

Research and

Development: 19%

Service: 32%

By Service 

Army

32%

Navy/Marines

13%

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

38%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 9% Reserve: 20%

Civilian: 25%

National Guard: 47%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

61%

Navy/Marines

19%

Air Force

18%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

BAE Systems

Bechtel Group

FedEx

Chemring Group

Alon USA LP

Jacobs

Integration Innovation, Inc.

Tevet

ECI Defense Group

Barrett Firearms Mfg, Inc.

(M = millions)

$451.7 M

$277.4 M

$239.2 M

$88.7 M

$87.3 M

$85.9 M

$49.5 M

$33.7 M

$30.1 M

$25.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.0

FY19

$2.3 $2.1

FY20

$2.0 $1.8 $1.5 $1.6 $1.4

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY21

$1.2 BILLION 26,752

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Shelby 1,476 2,537 1,380

Davidson 426 1,145 2,385

Blount 20 96 1,720

Rutherford 23 126 904 

Knox 90 362 191 

Montgomery 57 1,249 53 

Hamilton 52 99 386

Coffee 47 474 267

Washington 38 34 72 

Gibson 0 35 360

Reserve

1,226

1,378

ND 

468

789 

ND 

790 

ND 

337 

0 

Total

6,619

5,334

ND 

1,521

1,432

ND 

1,327

ND 

481 

395 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

TENNESSEE 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Rutherford Washington

Madison Blount Coffee

Shelby Hamilton

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Montgomery Sullivan

Davidson Anderson

Knox

Williamson Coffee

Shelby Hardeman Franklin

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Sullivan

Shelby

Coffee

Williamson

Hardeman

Montgomery

Davidson

Franklin

Knox

Anderson

(M = millions)

$470.2 M

$453.3 M

$445.8 M

$102.1 M

$89.0 M 

$64.9 M

$54.4 M

$53.4 M

$48.0 M

$46.9 M

Shelby

Davidson

Montgomery

Blount

Coffee

Knox

Rutherford

Hamilton

Madison

Washington

$411.9 M

$238.4 M

$92.9 M

$67.6 M

$51.2 M

$48.2 M

$48.0 M

$36.4 M

$12.5 M

$11.0 M

Montgomery

Davidson

Knox

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 103

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
**EXHIBIT 31.4**
 
 ****
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 302 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Patrick J. Goodman, certify that:
 
 1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofMidAmerican Funding, LLC;2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 
 
 Date: November 4, 2004
 /s/ Patrick J. Goodman
 Patrick J. Goodman
 Vice President and Treasurer
 (chief financial officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet of MidAmerican  Energy Company as of June 30, 1998,
and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the six
months  ended June 30,  1998,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
 </LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000928576
<NAME>                        MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,606,322
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    126,195
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         287,471
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       319,570
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 168,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,507,988
<COMMON>                                       560,562
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            417,065
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 977,627
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                    31,760
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           929,327
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 41,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  199,351
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,178,423
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3,507,988
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      783,936
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           38,626
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     651,362
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     689,988
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        93,948
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             1,768
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 95,716
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       44,157
<NET-INCOME>                                   51,559
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    2,475
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  49,084
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       57,200
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      35,145
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         235,699
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>