alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
KUDLINSKI v. NORWOOD.

No. COA05-580.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 22, 2024

NO. 03-23-00037-CV

River Creek Development Corporation and City of Hutto, Texas, Appellants

v.

Preston Hollow Capital, LLC; 79 HCD Development, LLC;

Public Finance Authority; and U.S. Bank National Association, Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on December 6, 2022. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. Appellants shall pay all 

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 43100]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11788]


Notice: International Digital Economy and Telecommunication 
(IDET) Advisory Committee Charter Renewal

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal--IDET.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (FACA) and the general authority of the Secretary of State and the 
Department of State, the charter of the International Digital Economy 
and Telecommunication (IDET) Advisory Committee has been renewed for 
two years.
    The IDET consists of members of the telecommunications industry, 
including network operators and service providers, equipment vendors, 
members of academia; members of organizations, institutions, or 
entities with specific interest in digital economy, digital 
connectivity, economic aspects of emerging digital technologies, 
telecommunications, and communications and information policy matters; 
members of civil society; and officials of interested government 
agencies. The IDET provides views and advice to the Department of State 
on positions concerning international digital economy, 
telecommunications, and information policy matters. This advice has 
been a major factor in ensuring that the United States was well 
prepared to participate effectively in the international 
telecommunications and information policy arena, including the 
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the Organization of 
American States Inter-American Telecommunication Commission (CITEL), 
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the 
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum Telecommunications and 
Information Working Group (APEC TELWG), the Group of Seven (G&), the 
Group of Twenty (G20) Digital Economy Task Force, and relevant 
standards setting bodies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Please contact the Designated Federal 
Officer (DFO) Daniel Oates, or Brian Mattys at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#135a5756475360677267763d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="58111c1d0c182b2c392c3d763f372e">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 
647-5205, or (202) 878-2010.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. Appendix; 22 U.S.C. 2656.

Kevin E. Bryant,
Acting Director, Office of Directives Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-15341 Filed 7-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1114/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1114/2013 of 7 November 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 as regards its period of            application (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1114/2013                     

# of 7 November 2013

# amending Regulation (EC) No 1857/2006 as regards its period of application (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 of 25 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid in the agricultural and forestry                                 sectors and in rural areas compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the                                 Functioning of the European Union.
Exhibit 24.1

POWERS OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints C. Allen Bradley, Jr., G. Janelle Frost and Todd Walker, and each of them, the true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on
his behalf as a director or officer or both, as the case may be, of AMERISAFE, Inc. an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to sign any or all
amendments thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the
others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



|                          |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|/s/ C. Allen Bradley, Jr. |  |  |  | /s/ Millard E. Morris
|C. Allen Bradley, Jr.     |  |  |  | Millard E. Morris    
|                          |  | 
|/s/ G. Janelle Frost      |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel Phillips  
|G. Janelle Frost          |  |  |  | Daniel Phillips      
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Thomas W. Hallagan    |  |  |  | /s/ Randall Roach    
|Thomas W. Hallagan        |  |  |  | Randall Roach        
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Jared A. Morris       |  |  |  | /s/ Sean M. Traynor  
|Jared A. Morris           |  |  |  | Sean M. Traynor      
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Austin P. Young, III  |  |  |  |                      
|Austin P. Young, III      |  |  |  |                      



Dated: March 5, 2009
# L_2015031DE.01003301.xml

| 7.2.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 31/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 31/33

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses 2013/488/EU des Rates vom 23. September 2013 über die Sicherheitsvorschriften für den Schutz von EU-Verschlusssachen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 274 vom 15. Oktober 2013
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 274 vom 15. Oktober 2013

Auf Seite 2, Artikel 2 Absatz 2 Buchstabe d:

anstatt:

„... deren unbefugte Weitergabe für die wesentlichen Interessen der Europäischen Union oder eines oder mehrerer Mitgliedstaaten nachteilig sein könnte.“

muss es heißen:

„... deren unbefugte Weitergabe für die Interessen der Europäischen Union oder eines oder mehrerer Mitgliedstaaten nachteilig sein könnte.“

---
STATE v. MARION.

COA06-98.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 7, 2006.

Certification Date November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (03CRS235797).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Executive Incentive Plan for Fiscal 2006



 Exhibit 10.4 
  
 Executive Incentive Plan for Fiscal 2006 
  
 The following is a description of the Company’s executive incentive plan for the Company’s fiscal year ending March 31, 2006.
Participants in the plan include the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers. The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) is responsible for determining the payout under the plan to each executive officer
except the Chief Executive Officer. The Board of Directors of the Company determines the payout under the plan for the Chief Executive Officer, taking into account the recommendation received from the Committee. 
  
 Pursuant to the plan, the Committee designated for each executive officer a target cash
incentive amount, expressed as a percentage of the officer’s base salary. In establishing these targets, the Committee based its decision for each officer on the level of total compensation including base salary, cash incentive and equity paid
by similar companies for comparable positions based on market data compiled by external consulting firms. 
  
 The amount of the incentive award actually paid to each executive officer may be less than or greater than the executive’s target cash incentive with the amount capped at 156% of the target incentive. Individual
incentive awards will be determined following the end of fiscal 2006 based on the following factors and their corresponding weightings: 
  

	•	 	the Company’s net income for fiscal 2006 as compared to the target established by the Committee – 40% 

  

	•	 	the executive’s achievement of individual, measurable objectives during fiscal 2006, as determined by the Committee for all executives with the exception of the Chief Executive
Officer, who is evaluated by the Board of Directors – 40% 

  

	•	 	the executive’s overall contribution during fiscal 2006 towards the achievement of the Company’s financial and non-financial objectives – 20%


  
 The following table sets forth each current officer’s
target cash incentive for fiscal 2006. 
  

						
	 Executive Officer

	  	 Title

	  	Target Incentive


	 Gregory J. Yurek
	  	Chief Executive Officer and President	  	$	227,500
	 Terry M. Winter
	  	Chief Operating Officer	  	$	86,667
	 Kevin M. Bisson
	  	Senior VP, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer	  	$	92,840
	 Alexis P. Malozemoff
	  	Executive VP and Chief Technical Officer	  	$	73,438
	 Stuart C. Karon
	  	VP, Business Development	  	$	59,500
	 Thomas M. Rosa
	  	VP, Finance and Accounting	  	$	37,125
# Political and Security Committee Decision EUTM Mali/3/2013Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision EUTM Mali/3/2013 of 12 November 2013 on the acceptance of third States' contributions            to the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali) (2013/697/CFSP)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision EUTM Mali/3/2013                     

# of 12 November 2013

# on the acceptance of third States' contributions to the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the                        Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali)                     

# (2013/697/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2013/34/CFSP of 17 January 2013 on a European Union military mission to contribute to the                           training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali)(1), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Decision 2013/34/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take                              the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States.

(2)Following recommendations on a contribution from the Swiss Confederation by the EU Mission Commander and the advice from the                              European Union Military Committee, the contribution from the Swiss Confederation should be accepted.

(3)In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to                              the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and the implementation                              of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Consequently, Denmark is not participating in the adoption                              of this Decision and is neither bound by it nor subject to its application,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

## Article 1U.K.Third States' contributions

1.The contribution from the Swiss Confederation to the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the                        Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali) is accepted and is considered to be significant.                  

2.The Swiss Confederation is exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUTM Mali.                  

## Article 2U.K.Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 12 November 2013.

*For the Political and Security Committee*                            

*The Chairperson*                            

W. Stevens                            

1

OJ 14, 18.1.2013, p. 19.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Elrico Randle, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[801 NYS2d 188]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Frank P Geraci, Jr., J.), rendered November 26, 2002. The judgment resentenced defendant upon a conviction for robbery in the first degree (three counts), sodomy in the first degree and rape in the first degree (two counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of three counts of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15 [3]), two counts of rape in the first degree (§ 130.35 [1]) and one count of sodomy in the first degree (former § 130.50 [1]). We reject defendant’s contention that County Court failed to conduct an appropriate inquiry into defendant’s allegations concerning defense counsel’s allegedly inadequate representation. Contrary to the contention of defendant, his allegations did not establish a serious complaint concerning defense counsel’s representation and thus did not “ ‘suggest a serious possibility of good cause for substitution [of counsel]’ ” *(People v Benson,*265 AD2d 814, 814 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 860 [1999], *cert denied*529 US 1076 [2000], quoting *People v Frayer,*215 AD2d 862, 863 [1995], *lv denied*86 NY2d 794 [1995]; *see generally People v Sides,*75 NY2d 822, 824 [1990]).

Defendant further contends that the court erred in admitting *1342the narrative portions of three statements of prosecution witnesses that improperly bolstered their trial testimony. By failing to object to the admission of the first statement, defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention concerning that statement *(see People v Love,*57 NY2d 1023, 1025 [1982]; *People v Sinkler,*288 AD2d 844, 845 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 761 [2002] ), and we decline to exercise our power to review his contention with respect to that statement as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice *(see*CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). With respect to the remaining two statements, we agree with defendant that the admission of the narrative portions of those statements improperly bolstered the trial testimony of the witnesses who made those statements *(see People v Usher,*265 AD2d 813 [1999], *lv denied*94 NY2d 886 [2000]; *see generally People v McClean,*69 NY2d 426, 428 [1987]). We nevertheless conclude that the error is harmless *(see Usher,*265 AD2d 813 [1999]; *see generally People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]).

Finally, we conclude that the resentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Gorski, Martoche, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Carol K. Nelson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cascade Financial
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

   (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

   (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 6, 2004                           /s/ Carol K. Nelson
                                            -----------------------------------
                                             Carol K. Nelson, President and CEO
STATE v. BUHL.

No. COA06-386.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Transylvania (04CRS52421, 04CRS52422).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 11

PAULA FINANCIAL AND SUBSIDIARIES  Computation of Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share  (In thousands, except per share data)

|                                                                             |  | Three Months Ended
September 30, |           | Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | --------- | -------------------------------
|
|Net income                                                                   |  | $                                | 106       |                                
|                                                                             |  |                                  |           |                                
|Weighted average shares outstanding for calculating basic earnings per share |  |                                  | 6,089,879 |                                
|Options                                                                      |  |                                  | 35,461    |                                
|                                                                             |  |                                  |           |                                
|Total shares for calculating diluted earnings per share                      |  |                                  | 6,125,340 |                                
|                                                                             |  |                                  |           |                                
|Basic earnings per share                                                     |  | $                                | 0.02      |                                
|                                                                             |  |                                  |           |                                
|Diluted earnings per share                                                   |  | $                                | 0.02      |                                
|                                                                             |  |                                  |           |                                

---

QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America, Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Edward
        E. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 */s/
                  Edward E. Cohen*Edward
                  E. CohenChief
                  Executive OfficerAugust
                8, 2006
Exhibit
10.1


 


AMENDMENT
TO


VEECO
INSTRUMENTS INC.


2000 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


Effective May 25, 2005


 


Section 5(a) of the Veeco Instruments Inc.
2000 Stock Incentive Plan, formerly known as the 2000 Stock Option Plan, as
amended (the “2000 Plan”), is hereby amended to read, in its entirety, as
follows:


 


5.                                             Grant of Awards;
Shares Subject to the Plan


 


The Committee
may, from time to time, grant Plan Awards to one or more Eligible Persons; provided,
however, that:


 


(a)                                  Subject
to Section 10, the aggregate number of shares of Stock in respect of which
Plan Awards may be granted under the Plan shall not exceed 8,530,000, of which
no more than 1,700,000 may be in the form of Restricted Stock;