alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
rsagree



	EXHIBIT 10.11









EQUITY AWARD AGREEMENT




















Name


Address


City, State Zip





Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Company's 2001 Amended and Restated Equity Plan, you have
been granted the following award:  										





	Granted To:
	
	Grant Date:
	
	Type of Grant:
	
	Shares Granted:
	
	Option Price:
	
	Vesting Schedule:
	
	Expiration Date:









By my signature below, I hereby acknowledge receipt of these shares granted on the date shown above, which
have been issued to me under the terms and conditions of the Plan.  I further acknowledge receipt of the copy
of the Plan and agree to conform to all of the terms and conditions of the grant and the Plan.











Signature:							Date:
80 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Honeywell $1.2 B

Los Alamos National Security, LLC $112.0 M

Westwind Computer Products Inc. $108.0 M

Applied Research Associates $95.3 M

K.L. House Construction Co. $71.6 M

Trax International $63.5 M

Raytheon $52.2 M

Lockheed Martin $48.3 M

CAE $47.6 M

Boeing $45.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NEW MEXICO

#28 #12 0.8% $1,953 #29 #31 #28

$4.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

4.0% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $2.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

23,989 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.3 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

23,989

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Bernalillo 3,460 3,058 1,262 804 8,584

Curry 4,650 485 45 31 5,211

Otero 4,035 883 59 86 5,063

Dona Ana 345 1,663 516 180 2,704

Santa Fe 13 228 535 167 943

Sandoval ND 19 632 ND

Chaves ND 12 169 ND

Valencia ND ND 179 ND

San Juan ND ND 123 ND

Rio Arriba ND 14 70 ND

Construction: 5%

Research and

Development: 16%

Service: 73%

Supplies and

Equipment: 7%

Active Duty: 52%

Civilian: 27%

National 

Guard: 16%

Reserve: 5%

11%

29%

46%

14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

26%

2%

70%

2%

$1.3 $1.5

$2.2 $2.2 $2.1 $2.2 $2.4

$2.8

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 81

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

San Juan

Sandoval

Santa Fe

Los Alamos

Bernalillo

Curry

Roosevelt

Socorro

Otero

Dona Ana

NEW MEXICO FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Bernalillo

Dona Ana

Otero

Curry

Los Alamos

Sandoval

Santa Fe

Socorro

Roosevelt

San Juan

(M = millions)

$2.0 B

$226.6 M

$202.2 M

$119.1 M

$112.7 M

$38.4 M

$16.3 M

$6.8 M

$1.0 M

$551.6 K

Bernalillo

Curry

Otero

Dona Ana

Santa Fe

Sandoval

Chaves

Valencia

San Juan

Socorro

$525.7 M

$294.4 M

$278.4 M

$165.8 M

$42.1 M

$12.6 M

$4.7 M

$2.3 M

$2.3 M

$2.0 M

San Juan

Sandoval

Curry Valencia

Socorro

Chaves

Bernalillo Santa Fe

Otero

Dona Ana
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brian F. Lavin,President and Chief Executive Officer of NTS Realty Capital, Inc., themanaging general partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership (the “Company”),certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | November 7, 2008                                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                 |
| Name:  | */s/ Brian F. Lavin*                                 | * * |
|   | Brian F. Lavin                                       |
|   |                                                 |
| Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer of             |
|   | NTS Realty Capital, Inc., the Managing  General |
|   | Partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited  Partnership  |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 10.13

	
  

  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
BIOCRYST   PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
2190 PARKWAY   LAKE DRIVE
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
   
  	
  
BIRMINGHAM,   AL 35244
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
205-444-4600   205-444-4640 FAX
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
www.biocryst.com
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
Memo
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
   
  	
  
Re:     Officer   Salaries 2005 Term Sheet
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  


  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
The   following memo sets forth the 2005 annual base salary established for the   officers of BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. by the Compensation Committee of   the Board of Directors.
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
   
  	
  
Charles E.   Bugg-Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
  	
  
$425,000   effective 1/1/05
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
J. Claude   Bennett-President, Chief Operating Officer and Medical Director
  	
  
$325,000   effective 1/1/05
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
Michael A.   Darwin-Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
  	
  
$189,840   effective 1/1/05
  	
  
 
  
	
  
 
  	
  
 
  	
  
$210,000   effective 5/16/05
  	
  
 
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
  Randall B.   Riggs-Vice President Business Development
  	
  $255,000 at   hire
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  	
   
  
	
   
  	
  Jonathan M.   Nugent-Vice President Corporate Communications 
  	
  $180,000 at   hire
# L_2012216DE.01000301.xml

| 14.8.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 216/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 216/3

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 536/2012 der Kommission vom 21. Juni 2012 zur Festsetzung der Erstattungssätze bei der Ausfuhr von Eiern und Eigelb in Form von nicht unter Anhang I des Vertrags fallenden Waren

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 163 vom 22. Juni 2012
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 163 vom 22. Juni 2012

Auf Seite 17, KN-Kode 0407, Spalte 2 „Warenbezeichnung“:

anstatt:

„– Bruteier:“

muss es heißen:

„– andere Eier, frisch:“.

---
# L_2021094DE.01000701.xml

| 18.3.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 94/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 94/7

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2013/29/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 12. Juni 2013 zur Harmonisierung der Rechtsvorschriften der Mitgliedstaaten über die Bereitstellung pyrotechnischer Gegenstände auf dem Markt

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 178 vom 28. Juni 2013
  )

Seite 32, Artikel 3 Nr. 1

Anstatt:

| „1. | ‚pyrotechnischer Gegenstand‘: jeder Gegenstand, der explosionsgefährliche Stoffe oder Stoffgemische enthält, mit denen aufgrund selbständiger, unter Freiwerden von Wärme ablaufender chemischer Reaktionen Wärme, Licht, Schall, Gas oder Rauch oder eine Kombination dieser Wirkungen erzeugt werden soll;“ |
| --- | --- |

„1.

‚pyrotechnischer Gegenstand‘: jeder Gegenstand, der explosionsgefährliche Stoffe oder Stoffgemische enthält, mit denen aufgrund selbständiger, unter Freiwerden von Wärme ablaufender chemischer Reaktionen Wärme, Licht, Schall, Gas oder Rauch oder eine Kombination dieser Wirkungen erzeugt werden soll;“

muss es heißen:

| „1. | ‚pyrotechnischer Gegenstand‘: jeder Gegenstand, der explosionsgefährliche Stoffe oder Stoffgemische enthält, mit dem aufgrund selbständiger, unter Freiwerden von Wärme ablaufender chemischer Reaktionen Wärme, Licht, Schall, Gas oder Rauch oder eine Kombination dieser Wirkungen erzeugt werden soll;“. |
| --- | --- |

„1.

‚pyrotechnischer Gegenstand‘: jeder Gegenstand, der explosionsgefährliche Stoffe oder Stoffgemische enthält, mit dem aufgrund selbständiger, unter Freiwerden von Wärme ablaufender chemischer Reaktionen Wärme, Licht, Schall, Gas oder Rauch oder eine Kombination dieser Wirkungen erzeugt werden soll;“.

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5197 

To suspend temporarily the duty on white plastic mounting flange, 286 

millimeter diameter, 45 millimeter thickness. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on white plastic mounting 

flange, 286 millimeter diameter, 45 millimeter thickness. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WHITE PLASTIC MOUNTING FLANGE, 286 MILLI4 METER DIAMETER, 45 MILLIMETER THICK5 NESS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

HR 5197 IH 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 White plastic mounting 

flange, 286 millimeter diameter, 45 millimeter thickness 

(provided for in subheading 

8543.90.88) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
MAYFIELD v. HANNIFIN, et al.

No. 699P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 20, 2005.

Matthew D. Glidewell, Charlotte, M. Duane Jones, for Parker Hannifin.

Linda Hartwell, Kathleen Sumner, Greensboro, for Willie Mayfield.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of December 2005 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 20th day of December 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             544
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,999
<ALLOWANCES>                                       228
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,994
<PP&E>                                           8,191
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,024
<BONDS>                                          9,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,683
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,290
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,681
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,663
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,018
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,018
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
        

</TABLE>
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS PENA 

### PRIVATETM*- TM 

# 9/11/2015 SSffeZI jZIP 78701 02 W 0001401623SEP 18 2015 

### APPLEGATE, JEFFERY DUANE\TrpSOlo.?F8599 A On this day, the application f—jH" ' and presented to the Court 

# ETURNTO SENDfcf. 

# NOTINJAIOTeGOMJAIL TARRANT COUNTY JAIL

- TDC # 1804949 100 N.LAMAR FORTWORTH, TX 76102 WR-83,881-01 

### Corpus has been received Abel Acosta, Clerk
90 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Boeing $1.6 B

V2X $147.4 M

Arctic Slope Regional Corp. $101.0 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $88.7 M

Harper Construction Company $63.4 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $52.5 M

Cymstar $48.6 M

L3Harris Technologies $47.4 M

Professional Contract Services $42.8 M

Strategic Mission Systems $42.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

OKLAHOMA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

59,376

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Oklahoma 6,379 18,179 2,180 2,072 28,810

Comanche 11,982 2,560 414 386 15,342

Tulsa 42 888 1,755 302 2,987

Jackson 1,286 1,239 81 88 2,694

Garfield 1,258 303 166 114 1,841

Pittsburg ND 1,694 68 11 ND

Cleveland 48 174 958 74 1,254

Canadian ND 25 658 365 ND

Wagoner 13 22 438 330 803

Muskogee ND 84 466 41 ND

Construction: 3% Research and

Development: 2%

Service: 69%

Supplies and

Equipment: 26%

Active Duty: 36%

Civilian: 43%

National 

Guard: 15%

Reserve: 7%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

10%

7%

74%

8%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

42%

5%

49%

5%

$2.0

$3.0 $2.8 $3.1 $3.2 $3.2

$2.7

$3.5

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#25 #13 1.2% $1,730 #26 #40 #13 #13

$7.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.9% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$3.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

59,376 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$66.3 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 91

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Adair

OKLAHOMA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Oklahoma

Comanche

Tulsa

Garfield

Jackson

Rogers

Cleveland

Pittsburg

Payne

Adair

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.5 B

$309.8 M

$307.3 M

$191.3 M

$61.1 M

$35.3 M

$28.5 M

$27.4 M

$26.0 M

$16.6 M

Oklahoma

Comanche

Jackson

Garfield

Pittsburg

Tulsa

Cleveland

Canadian

Wagoner

Muskogee

$2.0 B

$739.4 M

$169.8 M

$117.4 M

$116.8 M

$111.9 M

$35.3 M

$19.5 M

$16.0 M

$12.9 M

Garfield

Payne

Oklahoma

Tulsa Rogers

Cleveland

Comanche

Jackson

Pittsburg

Garfield

Oklahoma

Cleveland

Canadian

Tulsa

Wagoner

Muskogee

Comanche

Jackson

Pittsburg
In re Trudy WADE.

No. 717P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 27, 2005.

Michael Crowell, Raleigh, for Trudy Wade.

Susan K. Nichols, Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, for Board of Elections.

Larry Moore, Greensboro, for John Parks.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of December 2005 by Petitioner (Trudy Wade) for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of December 2005."
Opinion issued August 1 , 202 4

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO S . 01
- 2 4
- 00 55 6
- C R

——————————— IN RE KEYLIN DAVEYON HOLLINS , RELATOR

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator , an inmate in the Harris County Jail who is currently facing capital murder charges , has filed th is pro se petition for writ of mandamus complaining that
the trial court should dismiss the charges against him because “the evidence conclusively, and rational ly (sic) inferences can establish reasonable doubt

. ” 1

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Keylin Daveyon Hall , cause number 1802366 , pending in the 351st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Natalia Cornelio , presiding.2

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 52.8(a). We dismiss any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas

- Molloy, and Farris

. Do not publish. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2( b).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6515

ANTONIO JACOBS,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN NELSON,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Orangeburg. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (5:19-cv-03440-JMC)

Submitted: September 14, 2021 Decided: September 20, 2021

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Jacobs, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Jacobs seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Jacobs’ 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jacobs has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 May 12, 2008/s/   Steven M. Van DickVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**We have issued our reports dated March 13, 2006, except forthe restatement discussed in Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements as to which the date is August 14, 2006,accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of INX Inc. (formerly I-SectorCorporation) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference ofsaid reports in the Registration Statements of INX Inc. (formerly I-Sector Corporation) on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-41001,effective November 25, 1997 and File No. 333-60320, effective May 7, 2001)./s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
**EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America, Inc. (the "Company")
        on
        Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
        Matthew
        A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 (1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 */s/
                  Matthew A. Jones*Matthew
                  A. JonesChief
                  Financial OfficerAugust
                8, 2006