alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Sylvester Vallee, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 740]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), rendered June 30, 2003, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, vehicular manslaughter in the second degree, assault in the second degree (two counts), vehicular assault in the second degree (two counts), assault in the third degree, operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, speeding, failure to obey a stop sign, and reckless driving, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*503Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenges to the prosecutor’s summation comments are unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Shelton,*307 AD2d 370 [2003], *affd*1 NY3d 614 [2004]; *People v Urena,*305 AD2d 433 [2003]; *People v Mejias,*296 AD2d 583 [2002]). In any event, although many of the prosecutor’s comments were improper *(see People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105 [1976]; *People v Smith,*288 AD2d 496 [2001]; *People v Walters,*251 AD2d 433 [1998]), the errors were harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242 [1975]; *People v Richardson,*294 AD2d 379, 380 [2002]; *People v Brown,*285 AD2d 472, 473 [2001]). Further, contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was provided with meaningful representation *(see People v Taylor,*1 NY3d 174 [2003]; *People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708 [1998]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Apollo Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2017 (the “Report”), I, James C. Zelter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory W. Hunt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                       
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ JAMES C. ZELTERJames C. ZelterChief Executive OfficerFebruary 7, 2018


/s/ GREGORY W. HUNTGregory W. HuntChief Financial Officer and TreasurerFebruary 7, 2018
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SHIRUNE GREEN, DOC# R77067, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1840

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed August 24, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas

County; Frank Quesada, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Ama N. Appiah, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KHOUZAM, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
PROMISSORY
NOTE





 





	$500,000	                                             July
    9, 2016




 





FOR A GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION,
receipt of which is acknowledged hereby, the undersigned, Endonovo Therapeutics, In., a Delaware corporation, with offices at 6320
Canoga Avenue, 15th Floor, Woodland Hills CA 91367 (“Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the holders of
the issued and outstanding shares of stock of Rio Grande Neurosciences, Inc. (“RGNI”) at 6401 Richards Avenue, Santa
Fe, New Mexico 87508 (collectively the “Holder”) in lawful money of the United States of America, the principal sum
of Five Hundred Thousand ($500,000) Dollars on January 8, 2017, subject to mandatory prepayment as set forth herein. Interest shall
accrue on the unpaid principal balance of this Note at the rate of 7.5% per annum and shall be paid with any payment or prepayment
of this note.




  


Payment
under this Note shall be made at the Holder’s address set forth above, or such other address as may be designated by the
Holder or his legal representative in a written notice delivered to the Borrower. This Note may be pre-paid in whole or in part
at any time without penalty.


 


Upon
any failure to pay the principal or interest when due under this Note interest shall accrue and be payable on the on the amount
then due at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum (or, if lower, the maximum rate permitted by law) until the obligation of
the Borrower with respect to such payment has been discharged.


 


This
is the Note referred to in the Letter of Intent (“LOI”) of even date between the RGNI and the Borrower and the Holder
shall have all of the rights provided in the LOI. This note shall become due and payable in cash upon the closing of the transactions
contemplated by the LOI (“Mandatory Prepayment”). I the event the Transaction as contemplated is not consummated,
Borrower, in its sole option, may pay this note in cash or through the issuance of shares of its common stock at 75% of the average
closing price for the last ten trading days. Borrower represents that upon any such issuance of its shares, Holder shall be entitled
to tack the holding period of this note for purposes of determining its holding period under Rule 144 under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended (“33 Act”). While any shares so issued may initially bear an appropriate legend under the 33 Act,
Borrower believes that such legend may be immediately removed under Rule 144 if the issuance is more than six months from the
date hereof.


 


This
Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The Borrower hereby waives presentment
of this Note for payment, demand, notice of dishonor, protest and notice of protest. The Borrower shall pay all reasonable costs
and expenses incurred by the holder of this Note in any proceeding instituted to enforce the payment thereof, including attorney’s
fees, provided the holder of this Note is wholly or partially successful in any such proceeding.


 


	 	Endonovo
    Therapeutics, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	
	 	 	Alan
    Collier, CEO
**Exhibit 4.3**

  CONSENT OF EUGENE PURITCH

    Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28,    2010 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S.  Securities and Exchange Commission.

    I participated, as an independent Qualified Person (as such term is defined in Canadian    National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), in the preparation of    an independent technical study, completed in 2009 (the “Technical Study”) concerning    mineralized material in the Coulon property for the Company. Portions of the Technical Study    are summarized under the heading “Item III– Description of the Business – 3.7 Coulon Property– 3.7.5 – Exploration and Drilling” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the yearended February 28, 2010 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit isincorporated by reference therein). I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing writtendisclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing headingand to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated byreference in the Annual Report.

    Very truly yours,

 

*/s/ Eugene Puritch*  Name: Eugene Puritch, P. Eng.

 

    May 19, 2010
Order entered July 12 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 00692 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF N . L. T., A CHILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 04 - 10316



### O R DER Before the Court is appellant’s July 3, 2013 motion to compel the Official Court Reporter for the 256 th Judicial District Court to file trial transcripts. A review of our records shows the reporter’s record for this case was filed afterhours on July 2, 2013 . Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion as moot

. Appellant’s brief is due twenty days from the date of this order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
STATE v. McKINNON.

No. COA04-1308.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. CORPENING.

No. COA05-1641.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from Surry (03CRS50040, 03CRS51027).

Case reported without published opinion. No error as to the conviction for possession of cocaine (03CRS51027); Reversed as to conviction for resist, delay, and obstruct (03CRS50040).
Exhibit 10.16

|To:    |  | Thomas Klein                                                             
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Title: |  | SVP and Group President, Sabre Travel Network and Sabre Airline Solutions
|Date:  |  | January 26, 2005                                                         

Dear
Tom,

This
letter is being provided to you to explain the benefits you are eligible to receive, in the event that your employment is involuntarily terminated by Sabre Inc. ("Sabre" or
the "Company") for any reason other than for "cause" (as defined in Sabre Holdings most recent Long Term Incentive Plan) or for non-performance. In order to be eligible to receive the
benefits provided for herein, you must agree to the revocation of the February 26, 2004 letter provided to you regarding severance benefits, and acknowledge your agreement by signing below in
the space provided and returning a copy of this letter to Jae Lynn Rangel in Executive Compensation.

The
benefits are as follows:



---







---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 525 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 525

To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 
   1996 to require that, in order to determine that a democratically 
  elected government in Cuba exists, the government extradite to the 
United States convicted felon William Morales and all other individuals 
 who are living in Cuba in order to escape prosecution or confinement 
         for criminal offenses committed in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2007

  Mr. King of New York (for himself, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Burton of 
Indiana, Mr. Fossella, and Mr. McCotter) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) Act of 
   1996 to require that, in order to determine that a democratically 
  elected government in Cuba exists, the government extradite to the 
United States convicted felon William Morales and all other individuals 
 who are living in Cuba in order to escape prosecution or confinement 
         for criminal offenses committed in the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT TO LIBERTAD ACT.

    Section 206 of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity 
(LIBERTAD) Act of 1996 (22 U.S.C. 6066) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' after the 
        semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) has proven its respect for the democratic rule of law 
        by ceasing to provide a safe harbor to individuals who have 
        been legally indicted or convicted of serious criminal 
        offenses, including convicted felon William Morales, and all 
        other individuals who have fled from the United States to Cuba 
        for the sole purpose of avoiding prosecution or confinement for 
        serious criminal offenses committed in the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John J. Dee, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Paragon
Real Estate Equity and Investment Trust, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Paragon Real Estate
Equity and Investment Trust (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of trustees
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 3, 2004. By:
    /s/ John J. DeeJohn J. DeeChief Financial Officer and
Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial Officer) 1
RLED INCOURT OF APPE>

12th Court of Appeals DistTYLF.:i TEXAS'

CATHY S.LUSK,/CL'\

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

FILE COPY

8/26/2015

CANTON, JAMARIOS LECHRISTOPHER

PD-0673-15

On this day, the Appellant's Pro Se petition for discretionary review has been

refused.

Abel Acosta, Clerk

COANo. 12-12-00118-CR

Tr. Ct. No. F1017409

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CATHY LUSK

1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354

TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
Jo Ann Outlaw KORNEGAY v. Bonnie R. ROBINSON, Administratrix of the Estate of Byard G. Kornegay, Jimmy B. Kornegay, Byard G. Kornegay, Jr., Gerald Clay Kornegay, Ricky Thomas Kornegay, Linda Kay K. Lane, and Mary Hazel K. Manuel.

No. 153A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 17, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 625 S.E.2d 805 (2006), reversing an order entered 25 October 2004 by Judge Thomas D. Haigwood in Superior Court, Duplin County, granting summary judgment in favor of all defendants. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 October 2006.

Warren, Kerr, Walston, Taylor & Smith, LLP, by John Turner Walston and Henry C. Smith, Goldsboro, for plaintiff-appellee.

Turner Law Offices, by W. Carroll Turner, Mount Olive, for defendant-appellant Jimmy B. Kornegay.

Harris, Creech, Ward and Blackerby, P.A., by Thomas M. Ward, Charles E. Simpson, Jr., and Jay C. Salsman, New Bern, for defendant-appellants Byard G. Kornegay, Jr., Gerald Clay Kornegay, and Linda Kay K. Lane; and Burrows & Hall, by Richard L. Burrows, for defendant-appellants Ricky T. Kornegay and Mary Hazel K. Manuel.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

REVERSED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #10163] 

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of South Dakota (FEMA-1596-DR), dated 07/22/2005. 

*Incident:*                         Severe Storm.                     

*Incident Period:*                         06/07/2005 through 06/08/2005.                     

*Effective Date:*                         07/22/2005.                               ( print page 49352)    

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/20/2005.                     

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to :  U.S. Small Business Administration, Disaster Area Office 3, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 07/22/2005, applications for Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. 

The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: 

*Primary Counties:*                     Corson, Faulk, Hyde, Potter, Spink, Stanley, Sully.                 

                    The Interest Rates are:                     *Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) with Credit Available Elsewhere:*                     4.750.                     *Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere:*                     4.000.                 

The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10163. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) 

Herbert L. Mitchell, 

Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 05-16696 Filed 8-22-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
V

BOBBY SIMMONS

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

NO. W\5^U

§

§

§

§

IN THE COURT OF

CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

PRO SE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Ijlt 15

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS:

COMES NOW the Appellant in the above-styled and numbered

cause and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to extend the

time for filing the Appellant's Petition for Discretionary

Review in this Cause and in support thereof would show to the

Court the following:

1. The style and number of this case in the Court of Appeals,

is BOBBY SIMMONS V. THE STATE OF TEXAS; Appeal No. 05-14-00241-

CR, 05-14-00240-CR.

2. The style and number of the case in the trial court is:

THE STATE OF TEXAS V. BOBBY SIMMONS; Cause No. F12-523070-W,

F12-52371-W; from the 363rd District Court of Dallas County, Texas.

3. The Appellant was convicted of the felony offenses of

possession with intent to deliver cocaine, and unlawful possession

of a firearm by a felon.

4. The conviction was affirmed in the Court of Appeals on

12-18-2014.

5. The deadline for filing the Appellant's Petition for

Discretionary Review in this cause is 1-17-2015

FILED IN

COURT OFCRIMINAL APPEALS

JAN 22 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

RECEIVED

©0URTOF CRIMINAL APPEALS

JAN 20 2015

AfcstlAcosta, Clerk
i|ll|!5

6. An extension of time for a period of sixty(60) days is

requested that would make the date 3-17-2015.

7. No prior request for an extension of time has been made.

8. The facts relied upon to show good cause for the requested

extension are, as follows: The-Appellant was represented by court

appointed counsel during the appeals of this case to the Court

of Appeals. After the conviction was affirmed, the trial court

refused to appoint counsel to file a Petition for Discretionary

Review. Therefore, additional time is needed for the Appellant

to either prepare and file the Petition pro se or to seek

legal assistance in filing the petition.

WHEREFORE/ PREMISES CONSIDERED, THE Appellant respectfully

requests that this Honorable Court extend time for filing the

Petition for Discretionary review in this Cause to 3-17-2015.

Respectfully submitted/

Bobby sMmons#1941546 SMib

Telford Unit

3899 State Hwy 98

New Boston, Tx 75570

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The Appellant hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing

Motion has been mailed to the Office of the Criminal District

Attorney for Dallas County, Frank Crowley Courts Building,133

N. Riverfront Blvd.,LB-19, Dallas, Texas 75207-4399, on this

»>y day of January, 2015.

Bobby Srmmoi

LkJkAAjQUvfe-
CORNELIUS v. CONY.

COA06-107.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from Rowan (05CVD1261)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed; sanctions ordered.