alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1244/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1244/2013 of 28 November 2013 approving non-minor amendments to the specification            for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Ciliegia di            Marostica (PGI)]         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1244/2013                     

# of 28 November 2013

# approving non-minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin                        and protected geographical indications [Ciliegia di Marostica (PGI)]                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality                           schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs(1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)By virtue of the first subparagraph of Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1151/2012, the Commission has examined Italy’s                              application for the approval of amendments to the specification for the protected geographical indication ‘Ciliegia di Marostica’,                              registered under Commission Regulation (EC) No 245/2002(2).

(2)Since the amendments in question are not minor within the meaning of Article 53(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the Commission                              published the amendment application in the *Official Journal of the European Union* (3) as required by Article 50(2)(a) of that Regulation.

(3)As no statement of objection under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the amendments                              to the specification should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The amendments to the specification published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* regarding the name contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby approved.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Dacian Cioloș                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

### **Class 1.6.****Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed**U.K.

#### ITALYU.K.

Ciliegia di Marostica (PGI)

1

OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 39, 9.2.2002, p. 12.                           

3

OJ C 153, 31.5.2013, p. 8.
Exhibit 32.1
 Page 1 of 1 Page
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of
Internet Infinity, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
March 31, 2004 (the “Report”), I, George Morris, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

(1)The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. §78o(d)); and

(2)The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date: April 26, 2005
    By:
    /s/ George MorrisGeorge MorrisChief Financial
Officer
The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350) and is not being
filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure
document.
STATE v. TRIPLETT

No. COA04-1552.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed November 15, 2005.

Certification Date December 5, 2005

Appeal from the Wilkes (02CRS54890).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error at trial. Remanded for resentencing.
STATE v. LOWERY.

No. COA05-1150.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 18, 2006.

Certification Date August 7, 2006.

Appeal from Montgomery (03CRS51253, 04CRS2571).

Case without published opinion. No error.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                        SPLASH TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE (1)
                    (in thousands, except per share amounts)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                                Eight Months                 Year Ended
                                                                   Ended                   September 30,
                                                               September 30,                    1997
                                                                    1996
                                                             ----------------            ----------------
<S>                                                           <C>                          <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding for the period:              7,009                      12,002                           

                                                                
                                                                
   Common equivalent shares deemed outstanding from             
   options and warrants to acquire common stock deemed
   converted using Modified Treasury Stock Method             833                        378
                                                                                     
   Common equivalent shares outstanding from conversion
   of preferred stock                                       1,741       2,574             43          421
                                                            -----     -------            ---      -------
Shares used in per share calculation                                    9,583                      12,423
                                                                      =======                     =======
Net income (loss)                                                     $(8,196)                    $ 5,091
Cumulative dividends on preferred stock                                  (730)                         (4)
                                                                      -------                     -------
Adjusted net income (loss)                                            $(8,926)                    $ 5,087
                                                                      =======                     =======
Net income (loss) per share                                           $ (0.93)                    $  0.41
                                                                      =======                     =======
</TABLE> 
(1) This exhibit presents the primary and fully diluted computations of net loss
    per share. There is no significant difference in the per-share amounts when
    applying either method.


                                      42
STATE v. Vonsa GRAHAM.

No. 408P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2006.

Nancy Reed Dunn, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of August 2006 by Defendant to Proceed in Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of December 2006."
# Political and Security Committee Decision EUMM Georgia/1/2013Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision EUMM Georgia/1/2013 of 13 September 2013 on the appointment of the Head of the European            Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) (2013/465/CFSP)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision EUMM Georgia/1/2013                     

# of 13 September 2013

# on the appointment of the Head of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia)

# (2013/465/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2010/452/CFSP of 12 August 2010 on the European Union Monitoring in Georgia, EUMM Georgia(1), and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Pursuant to Council Decision 2010/452/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee (PSC) is authorised, in accordance with Article                              38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of                              the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

(2)On 14 September 2012, the PSC adopted Decision EUMM Georgia/1/2012(2) extending the mandate of Mr Andrzej TYSZKIEWICZ, as Head of EUMM Georgia until 14 September 2013.

(3)On 24 July 2013, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of                              Mr Toivo KLAAR as Head of EUMM Georgia from 15 September 2013 to 14 December 2014,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Mr Toivo KLAAR is hereby appointed Head of the European Union Monitoring Mission in Georgia (EUMM Georgia) from 15 September                     2013 to 14 December 2014.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 13 September 2013.

*For the Political and Security Committee*                            

*The Chairperson*                            

W. Stevens                            

1

OJ L 213, 13.8.2010, p. 43.                           

2

OJ L 257, 25.9.2012, p. 15.
OFFICE **OF THE**  **ATTORNEY GENERAL**  **OF TEXAS**  AUSTINHon. Julian Kantgrmery, Eay 8, 1939, Page 2 i?entern

Fubllc Service Co. v. Uharg, Seoretary of State, 2.38Sk1 Ml, 292 S'i 168 

### It lof$3allyr0u0td6and the oourts 

### 0f Teata have 

### held cansiatentlythata foreigncorpora? tlon must conduct ltaelf in accordmoe with the constitutional and statutory provlslcma 

### 0r this atate. Southwestern Eke11 Telephone & Telegraph CO. 

### V. City of Da1la8, l31 W 80, l34sd 321. 3% y&l' v. ywn oroaerp fhqmly,

m#leJr v* Bells9 'prr lo60 'undex

### thmJaw8 

### 0r &a8 

### a oorprat%on 

### raaybaSaroldfarmjr0oorgOFoQit~p~~ speaiiiedin any 00 of the ~8ubdlvi8ba8 ti 8rlG ala lso8 of the Red8od Oivil 

### statute8of ss85& 

### butito4umQt~e-rortwo0r~ptrrporre8 aa 4a8lgnatedin tm 01~ wre or 

### the 8ubdlvl8lcam Rammyv.Tod,6968lS5 

### ~l6lYViBOlAS7SUlOBB The sewa zulo holdiwith r&met 

### to 

## r0m.60

oorparatlawf 

### fntha opiaiollorthlEde~tllo ~UrpC8e'QtU8OOf thBathb.hESi8tQ810~~8 ps~ttoctobu8kuMinT~,~h~~~e 8OtfAt,daQ8nat.hO2.UibUW.tOsnnot bsoOn8tZk+ 

### edto inelu& theoon8trWtlonoi et001 tJd&O8 

### within ttd stat+
STATE v. RABON

No. COA06-121

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Pender (05CRS50665).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
BOICE-WILLIS CLINIC, P.A. v. DAVID S.S.

No. 2P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 9, 2006.

George J. Oliver, Sidney S. Eagles, Jr., Raleigh, John W. Mann, for Boice-Willis Clinic, P.A.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of January 2006 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed pending the determination of the defendant's petition for discretionary review by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of January 2006."
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(a)

                  2006 Management Incentive Plan General Terms

Authority

The Management Incentive Plan is established by the Board's Executive
Organization & Compensation Committee (the "Committee") under the 1997 Long-Term
Performance Plan.

Objective

The plan's objective is to reward eligible participants for their contributions
toward the company's fiscal year business goals.

Participation

The plan's participants are those employees of Applied Industrial Technologies,
Inc. designated as participants by the Committee.

Eligibility for Awards

To be eligible for an award under the plan, assuming plan goals are met, a
participant must comply with the terms and conditions of the 1997 Long-Term
Performance Plan. In addition, except as provided in the 1997 Long-Term
Performance Plan, the participant must be actively employed by Applied on June
30, 2006, except,

      -- Participants retiring at age 55 or older under an Applied retirement
      plan are eligible for a prorated award based on date of retirement
      (calculated using number of quarters' and partial quarters'
      participation).

      -- Participants whose employment ceases due to death or permanent and
      total disability are eligible for a prorated award based on date of
      termination (calculated using number of quarters' and partial quarters'
      participation).

Goals

The Committee establishes the plan's goals.

<PAGE>

Other

The Committee has the authority, subject to the plan's express provisions, to
construe the plan, to establish, amend, and rescind rules and regulations
relating to the plan, and to make all other determinations in the Committee's
judgment necessary or desirable for the plan's administration.

The Committee may correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any
inconsistency in the plan in the manner and to the extent it shall deem
expedient to carry the plan into effect. All Committee action under these
provisions shall be conclusive for all purposes.
Exhibit 10.19

2000 Stock Option Plan

Sabre Holdings Corporation    As Amended and Restated  Effective as of November 13, 2000

---



TABLE OF CONTENTS

|           |  |                            |  | Page
|---------- |  | -------------------------- |  | ----
|Section 1. |  | Purpose and Definitions    |  | 1   
|Section 2. |  | Administration             |  | 2   
|Section 3. |  | Stock Subject to Plan      |  | 3   
|Section 4. |  | Stock Options              |  | 3   
|Section 5. |  | Stock Appreciation Rights  |  | 4   
|Section 6. |  | Change in Control          |  | 5   
|Section 7. |  | Amendments and Termination |  | 7   
|Section 8. |  | General Provisions         |  | 7   
|Section 9. |  | Term                       |  | 8   

---



Sabre Holdings Corporation  2000 Stock Option Plan

Section 1. Purpose and Definitions

The purpose of Sabre Holdings Corporation's Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") is to enable Sabre Holdings Corporation (the "Company") to attract, retain, and reward
employees of the Company, its Subsidiaries, and its Affiliates, and strengthen the mutuality of interests between such individuals and the Company's shareholders, by offering such individuals stock
incentives in the Company.

For
purposes of the Plan, the following terms shall be defined as follows:

---



In
addition, the terms "Change in Control," "Potential Change in Control," and "Change in Control Price" shall have the meanings set forth in Section 6.

Section 2. Administration

2

---





Section 3. Stock Subject to Plan

Section 4. Stock Options

Options granted under the Plan shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions as the Committee
shall deem desirable:

3

---



Section 5. Stock Appreciation Rights

Stock Appreciation Rights granted under the Plan shall be subject to the following terms and conditions and shall contain such additional terms and conditions as
the Committee shall deem desirable:

4

---



Section 6. Change in Control

5

---





6

---





Section 7. Amendments and Termination

Section 8. General Provisions

7

---





Section 9. Term

No Awards shall be granted pursuant to the Plan on or after March 15, 2010, but Awards granted prior to March 15, 2010 may extend beyond that date.

8

---



QuickLinks
IN RE T.K., III.

No. COA06-638.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Davie (05J71).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
In the Matter of the Willl of Mary M. YELVERTON, Deceased. appealed by Michael Yelverton, Caveator.

No. 376P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Robert E. Fuller, Jr., Goldsboro, for Mansel Yelverton.

Phillip A. Baddour, Jr., for Kelvin Artis.

*201*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of July 2006 by Caveator (Mansel Yelverton) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Gregory J. BARNES.

No. 72P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Gregory J. Barnes, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Howard S. Boney, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*493*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 3rd day of February 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wilson County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5271 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5271

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-(Isocyanatosulfonyl) 
                      benzoic acid, methyl ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-(Isocyanatosulfonyl) 
                      benzoic acid, methyl ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-(ISOCYANATOSULFONYL) BENZOIC ACID, METHYL ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.97 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-(Isocyanatosulfonyl) 
benzoic acid, methyl ester) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Employment Agreement Addendum

This
Addendum to William J. Hannigan's Employment Agreement is entered into effective as of July 17, 2001, by and between Sabre Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Sabre"), and William J.
Hannigan ("Employee").

Sabre
and Employee hereby agree that the vesting schedule of the restricted stock awarded to Employee on December 13, 1999 under the Employee's Employment Agreement is hereby modified as
follows:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, Sabre and Employee have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the date written below.

Date
signed: July 17, 2001

|                        |  | Sabre Inc.                                                            
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ William J. Hannigan |  | By: /s/ Michael E. Haefner                                            
|William J. Hannigan     |  | Name: Michael E. Haefner
Title: Senior Vice President, Human Resources

---

QuickLinks
Rudolph Leonard BAXLEY, Jr. v. Timothy O. JACKSON, Leisa S. Jackson and Rosewood Investments, L.L.C.

No. 548P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Richard M. Wiggins, Fayetteville, for Jackson, et al.

*463Garris Neil Yarborough, Fayetteville, for Baxley.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 634 S.E.2d 905.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th day of October 2006 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
**Exhibit** **31.2**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I,
Richard K Brock, certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Professional Lease Management
Income Fund I, L.L.C. (the Registrant).
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 
 a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;
 
 b)  evaluated
the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c)  disclosed
in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
 5.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
 
 
 
 
 Date: May
10, 2005  By:  /s/
Richard K Brock
 Richard K
Brock
 Chief
Financial Officer
 (Principal
Financial Officer)