alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Dominic PUGH.

No. 257P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Dominic Pugh, Pro Se.

Philip A. Lehman, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 9th day of May 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of May 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (1)

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  the  following  certification  is  being  made to
accompany  Catskill  Litigation  Trust's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended June 30, 2007;

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Catskill  Litigation  Trust (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Joseph
E. Bernstein,  Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that to my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         Section 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
         as amended; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                    /s/ Joseph E. Bernstein
                                    -------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Joseph E. Bernstein
                                    Title: Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                    Date:  August 20, 2007

(1)      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
         been  provided  to  Catskill  Litigation  Trust and will be retained by
         Catskill  Litigation Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
         Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
```
# L_2013154EN.01000701.xml

| 6.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/7

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 29 May 2013

appointing an Italian member of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/265/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following end of the term of office of Mr Giuseppe CASTIGLIONE, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following end of the term of office of Mr Giuseppe CASTIGLIONE,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Mr Guerino TESTA, Presidente della Provincia di Pescara. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Guerino TESTA, Presidente della Provincia di Pescara.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 29 May 2013.

For the Council

The President

R. BRUTON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Willie FORREST, III.

No. 270A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Irving Joyner, Durham, for Willie Forrest, III.

Kevin L. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States vacating the judgment of this Court and remanding this cause for further consideration in light of its decision in *Davis v. Washington,* 547 U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 165 L.Ed.2d 224 (2006), the following order is entered:

Defendant shall have 20 days from the filing of this order to file and serve a supplemental brief with this Court, limited to the question of whether there was error in this case pursuant to *Davis v. Washington. State v. Forrest,*359 N.C. 424, 611 S.E.2d 833 (2005). The State may file its brief in response within 20 days after service of the defendant's brief. Each side will be allowed up to 20 minutes of oral argument.

*187By order of the Court in Conference, this 17th day of August, 2006.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5693 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5693

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against 
                    tax for volunteer firefighters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2008

 Mr. Boozman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against 
                    tax for volunteer firefighters.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Volunteer Firefighter Recruitment 
and Retention Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. CREDIT FOR VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS.

    (a) In General.--Subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to nonrefundable 
personal credits) is amended by inserting after section 25D the 
following new section:

``SEC. 25E. CREDIT FOR VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS.

    ``(a) Allowance of Credit.--In the case of a volunteer firefighter, 
there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this 
chapter the credit amount determined under subsection (b).
    ``(b) Credit Amount.--With respect to a taxable year, the credit 
amount determined under this subsection is--
            ``(1) in the case of a volunteer firefighter who has 
        completed 3 or more years of service as a volunteer firefighter 
        during the taxable year, $1,000, and
            ``(2) in the case of a volunteer firefighter who has 
        completed 8 or more years of service as a volunteer firefighter 
        during the taxable year, $1,500.
    ``(c) Volunteer Firefighter.--For purposes of this section, the 
term `volunteer firefighter' means an individual who is a member in 
good standing of a qualified volunteer emergency response organization 
(as defined in section 139B).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for subpart A of 
part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by 
inserting after the item relating to section 25D the following new 
item:

``Sec. 25E. Credit for volunteer firefighters.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5634 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5634

To exempt from numerical limitations any alien who has received a Ph.D. 
   from an institution of higher education within the 3-year period 
     preceding such alien's petition for special immigrant status.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2008

   Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. McCaul of Texas) introduced the 
  following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To exempt from numerical limitations any alien who has received a Ph.D. 
   from an institution of higher education within the 3-year period 
     preceding such alien's petition for special immigrant status.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New American Innovators Act''.

SEC. 2. UNITED STATES EDUCATED IMMIGRANTS.

    (a) Special Immigrant Status.--Section 101(a)(27) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (L)(iii) by adding at the end a 
        semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (M) by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(N) an immigrant who has received a Ph.D. from an 
                institution of higher education (as defined in section 
                102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
                1002), but excluding any institution of higher 
                education described in section 102(a)(1)(C) of such 
                Act) within the 3-year period preceding the date on 
                which the immigrant filed a petition described in 
                section 204(a)(1)(G)(iii).''.
    (b) Petition for Status as a Special Immigrant.--Section 
204(a)(1)(G) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1154(a)(1)(G)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iii) Any alien claiming status as a 
                        special immigrant under section 101(a)(27)(N) 
                        may file a petition with the Secretary of 
                        Homeland Security for such status.''.
    (c) Aliens Not Subject to Direct Numerical Limitation.--Section 
201(b)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1151(b)(1)(A)) is amended by striking ``or (B)'' and inserting ``, (B), 
or (N)''.
    (d) Number and Allocation of Visas Not Limited for Certain Special 
Immigrants.--Section 203(b)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 
(8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(4)) is amended by striking ``or (B)'' and inserting 
``, (B), or (N)''.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS and Opinion Filed June 11, 2021 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01227-CV 

COMMERCIAL RECOVERY SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant 

V. 

CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. F/K/A VERICREST FINANCIAL, INC. 

AND CERNO SOLUTIONS, INC., Appellees 

On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-07683 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Molberg, Goldstein, and Smith 

Opinion by Justice Smith 

We reinstate this appeal. In 2014, we abated this case due to Commercial 

Recovery Systems, Inc’s bankruptcy. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. The Court conducted 

an independent review of the federal Public Access to Court Electronic Records 

(PACER) system which shows the bankruptcy case associated with this appeal was 

terminated on October 24, 2018, effectively dissolving the automatic stay. 

We notified the parties by letter, requesting they inform the Court of the status 

of the bankruptcy and of this appeal. We cautioned that the failure to respond would 
 –2– 

result in the appeal being dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. 42.3(b),(c). To 

date, neither party has responded. 

Because we gave the parties an opportunity to show why we should not 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution and no one responded, we dismiss this 

appeal. See id. 42.3(b),(c); Brewer v. Admiral Ins. Co., 2002 WL 31312990, at *1 

(Tex. App.—Dallas Oct. 16, 2002, no writ) (per curiam) (not designated for 

publication). 

131227F.P05 

 

/Craig Smith/

CRAIG SMITH 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

COMMERCIAL RECOVERY 

SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant 

No. 05-13-01227-CV V. 

CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. 

F/K/A VERICREST FINANCIAL, 

INC. AND CERNO SOLUTIONS, 

INC., Appellees 

 On Appeal from the 116th Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-07683. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Molberg and Goldstein 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered June 11, 2021
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A1714. JOSHUA DAVID MELLBERG, LLC et al. v. THE IMPACT

PARTNERSHIP, LLC et al. 

A15A1715. STANTON v. THE IMPACT PARTNERSHIP, LLC et al.

We granted applications filed by the Appellants seeking the right pursuant to

OCGA 5-6-34 (b) to file the captioned interlocutory appeals to consider the trial

court’s order denying their motions to dismiss. The Appellees in the captioned

appeals have filed motions to dismiss the appeals on the basis that this Court lacks

jurisdiction because the Appellants failed to comply with the interlocutory appeal

procedures set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Having considered the record on appeal,

we conclude that the Appellants failed to follow the proceduralrequirement of OCGA

§ 5-6-34 (b) that “the same trial judge who entered the order in question must issue

the certificate of immediate review.” Mauer v. Parker Fibernet, LLC, 306 Ga. App.

160, 162 (701 SE2d 599) (2010). Because this procedural requirement was not

followed, this Court has no jurisdiction to consider the appeals. Cherry v. Coast

House, Ltd., 257 Ga. 403, 404 (359 SE2d 904) (1987); Mauer, supra. Accordingly,

the appeals were improvidently granted; the motions to dismiss the appeals are

granted; and the captioned appeals are DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

01/19/2016

January 19, 2016
DANIELLE SHIPLETT, Appellant, vs. KEVIN SHIPLETT, Res s ondent. KEVIN MICHAEL SHIPLETT, Appellant, vs. DANIELLE NICOLE SHIPLETT, Res • ondent. 

### JAN 19 2 22 EUZABETH A. CLE OF SU COURT BY DEPUTY CLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
No. 83202

No. 83312 

# FILED

ORDER DISMISSING APPEALS Cause appearing, appellants motions for voluntary dismissal of these appeals are granted. These appeals are dismissed. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELIZABETH A. BROWN

- -NBY:

cc: Hon. Rebecca Burton, District Judge, Family Court Division Carolyn Worrell, Settlement Judge Robbins & Onello, LLP The Law Offices of Frank J. Toti, Esq. Eighth District Court Clerk

dc:.? - 333 SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER (0) 1947
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 11

                             CONTROL DEVICES, INC.
                       CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
               (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                     Three Months Ended                Six Months Ended
                                                              June 30, 1998   June 30, 1997     June 30, 1998   June 30, 1997
                                                              -------------   -------------     -------------   -------------
<S>                                                             <C>             <C>             <C>               <C> 
Net income                                                          $ 2,233         $ 1,689           $ 4,155         $ 3,225
                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding - Basic                    8,292           8,272             8,290           8,272
                                                                                                                
Add-Dilute effect of outstanding options ( as determined                                                        
   by the application of the treasury stock method)                     498             178               482             183
                                                                                                                
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding - Diluted                  8,790           8,450             8,772           8,455
                                                                ============     ===========      ============    ============
                                                                                                                
Earnings per share:                                                                                             
                                                                                                                
Basic                                                                 $0.27           $0.20             $0.50           $0.39
                                                                ============     ===========      ============    ============
                                                                                                                
Diluted                                                               $0.25           $0.20             $0.47           $0.38
                                                                ============     ===========      ============    ============
</TABLE>
STATE v. LANEY.

No. COA05-1360.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 20, 2006.

Certification Date July 10, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (03CRS213651, 03CRS213652, 03CRS213653, 03CRS213654, 03CRS213655).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Becky Sehorn HILLIER.

No. 32P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for Becky S. Hillier.

John F. Maddrey, Assistant Solicitor-General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 23rd day of January 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of January 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

WENDELL C. ROBINSON, 

and 

MAY T. JUNG-ROBINSON, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant. 

ORDER 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) Civil Case No. 12-0278 (RJL) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

~he reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this date, it is this 

~dayofJune,2013,hereby 

ORDERED that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #8] is GRANTED; and 

it is further 

ORDERED that plaintiffs Amended Complaint [Dkt. #6] is DISMISSED. 

SO ORDERED. 

7
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. JOHN LEO CERIZO, Defendant - Appellant. No. 12-10581 D.C. No. 1:04-cr-00222-SOM-1
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Susan Oki Mollway, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Subm itted October 10, 2013 * * Honolulu, Hawaii Before: KOZINSKI , Chief Judge, FISHER and WATFORD , Circuit Judges. 1. A district court m a y order restitution as part of supervised release, see 18 U.S.C. § 3563, and adjust a restitution paym ent schedule in light of changes in the “defendant’s econom ic circum stances,” 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k). The district court 

# FILED
OCT 18 2013 M OLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

* * The panel unanim ously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argum e nt. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).didn’t abuse its discretion by requiring Cerizo to pay his underinsured m otorist

insurance award and unclaim ed life insurance award towards restitution as a condition of his supervised release. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 981 (9th Cir. 2009).
2. Cerizo’s claim that the district court erred in denying him bail pending his supervised release hearing is m oot. Even if it were not, Cerizo’s long history of dishonesty and ties outside Hawaii and the United States provided an am ple basis for denying his bail request. See United States v. Garcia, 340 F.3d 1013, 1015 (9th Cir. 2003).
AFFIRMED
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

SGT, Inc. 

Under Contract No. NAS5-03079 et al. 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60032 

David M. Nadler, Esq. 

Justin A. Chiarodo, Esq. 

Stephanie M. Zechmann, Esq. 

Blank Rome LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Samuel W. Morris, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 5 May 2016 

MARK N. STEMPLE 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60032, Appeal of SGT, Inc., 

rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals