alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LAL BHATIA,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-16250

D.C. No. 4:09-cv-05581-SBA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Lal Bhatia appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging violations of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, in

connection with his federal criminal indictment. We have jurisdiction under 28

FILED

JAN 02 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-16250

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Rouse v U.S. Dep’t of State, 567 F.3d 408,

414 (9th Cir. 2009), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Bhatia’s claims under 5 U.S.C.

§§ 552(a)(d)(2) and (e)(5) because the records he sought to amend were exempt

from these Privacy Act requirements under Department of Justice (“DOJ”)

regulations. See 28 C.F.R. § 16.81(a), (d)(3), (8); see also Alexander v. United

States, 787 F.2d 1349, 1351-52 (9th Cir. 1986) (holding that plaintiff was “barred

from taking advantage of the civil remedies afforded by the Privacy Act” as a

result of DOJ regulations exempting arrest records maintained by Federal Bureau

of Investigation’s Identification Division Records System).

The district court properly dismissed Bhatia’s claim under 5 U.S.C.

§ 552a(e)(6) because Bhatia failed to allege facts showing that the information

provided to the grand jury was not accurate. See Rose v. United States, 905 F.2d

1257, 1259 (9th Cir. 1990) (listing elements of Privacy Act claim).

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Bhatia’s motion to

compel discovery or by staying discovery. See Laub v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, 342

F.3d 1080, 1093 (9th Cir. 2003) (discovery rulings should only be disturbed on

clear showing of actual and substantial prejudice).
3 11-16250

Bhatia’s pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT INTR ANSIT, INC ., a

n Ore gon c orporation, DB A UTI Tra nsport Solutions, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. TR AVELER S PR O PER TY AND C ASUALTY C OM PANY OF AM ER IC A, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-35002

D.C . No. 1:11-c v-03146-C L
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ore gon M a rk D. C la rke , M a gistra

te Judge , Pre s iding Argue d a nd Subm itte d July

8, 2014 Portla nd, Ore gon B e fore : PREGER SON, PAEZ, a nd WATFORD, C irc uit Judge s. The distric t c ourt e rre d in gra nting Intra

nsit, Inc .’ s m otion for sum m ary judgm e nt a

nd de ny ing Tra

ve l e rs Prope rty

and C a s ua lty C o.’ s c ross-m otion for
sum m ary judgm e nt. Unde r Ore gon la w, am b iguous te rm s in insura

nc e c ontra c ts 

# FIL E D JUL 25 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public a t ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3.Pa ge 2 of 3

are i nte rpre te d to the be ne fit of the insure d
. Hoffman C onstr. C o. v . Fre d S. J

ame s & C o. , 836 P.2d 703, 706–07 (Or. 1992) (e n ba nc ). The distric t c ourt prope rly
c onc lude d tha

t the te rm “ c arrie r” is a

m biguous a nd m ust the re fore inc l ude both fraudule nt a

nd le gitim ate m otor tra

nsporta tion c o m pa nie s. B ut the distric t c ourt
e rre d by not giving the

te rm “ c arrie r” the sa

m e m e a ning whe n c onstruing the polic y ’ s e xc lusion for c arrie r dishone sty . Nothing in the insura n c e a gre e m e nt

“ c l e arly indic a t[e s] ” an inte nt to de fine the te rm “ c arrie r” diffe re ntly in the
c ove ra ge and e xc l usions provisions. Sc hw e ige rt v . Be ne fic ial Standard Life

Ins. C o. , 282 P.2d 621, 626 (Or. 1955). Abse nt suc h a c l e ar indic a tion, Ore g on c ourts pre s um e tha

t a te rm ha s a c onsiste nt m e aning throughout a n insura n c e c ontra c t. Se e id. a t 625–26. The

c rim ina l a c ts of the fra

u dule nt “ c arrie r” tha

t re sulte d in the loss a re the re fore subje c t

to the e xc lusion. Howe ve r, Intra nsit is e ntitle d to re c ove r the $ 50,000 provide d by

the “ ‘ C arrie r’ Dishone sty ” e ndorse m e nt. In light of our holding, the distric t c ourt’ s a

ward of attorne y ’ s fe e s m ust be
re ve rse d. Intra

nsit’ s re c ove ry

doe s not e xc e e d the $50,000 te nde r that Tra ve le rs m a de prior to the suit. Intra nsit is there fore not e ntitle d to a ttorne y ’ s fe e s. Se e Or. R e v. Stat. § 742.061(1). The judgm e nt is re ve rse d and the c a se is re m an de d with instruc tions to e nte r judgm e nt in fa

vor of Intra

n sit in the am ount of $50,000.Pa ge 3 of 3

RE V E RSE D AND RE M ANDE D.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Internet Infinity, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George
      Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      July 14, 2008





*/s/
                George Morris*George
                MorrisChief
                Financial
                Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Internet Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Internet Infinity, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.


Exhibit
        32.2
 Page
        1 of
        1 Page
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION FOUND ON
PAGES 3 AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              23
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                       195
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,766
<PP&E>                                           4,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,363
<BONDS>                                          4,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,916
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,544
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,173
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,412
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,282
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,036
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,699
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,337
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,337
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
        

</TABLE>
HOPPER v. FLYNN

No. COA04-1068.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from Pasquotank (02CVS649).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
# L_2013042DE.01002201.xml

| 13.2.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 42/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 42/22

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1263/2012 des Rates vom 21. Dezember 2012 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 267/2012 über restriktive Maßnahmen gegen Iran

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 356 vom 22. Dezember 2012
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 356 vom 22. Dezember 2012

Seite 39 Artikel 1 Nummer 15, neuer Artikel 30 Absatz 3 Buchstabe b:

anstatt:

„... von über 40 000 EUR oder einem entsprechenden Betrag ist eine vorherige Genehmigung der zuständigen Behörde des betreffenden Mitgliedstaats nach Absatz 2 erforderlich.“

muss es heißen:

„... von mindestens 40 000 EUR oder einem entsprechenden Betrag ist eine vorherige Genehmigung der zuständigen Behörde des betreffenden Mitgliedstaats nach Absatz 2 erforderlich.“

Seite 41 Artikel 1 Nummer 15, neuer Artikel 30b Absatz 4:

anstatt:

„(4)   Für die Zwecke des Artikels 30 Absatz 1 Buchstabe c gilt die Genehmigung als erteilt, wenn ...“

muss es heißen:

„(4)   Für die Zwecke des Artikels 30a Absatz 1 Buchstabe c gilt die Genehmigung als erteilt, wenn ...“.

---
# C_2013127EN.01000101.xml

| 4.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 22 April 2013

on the appointment of the member of the European Statistical Advisory Committee representing the Council

2013/C 127/01

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union,

Having regard to Decision No 234/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 establishing the European Statistical Advisory Committee (1),

1

Having regard to the Recommendation of the Economic and Financial Committee of 25 March 2013,

Whereas:

| (1) | Ms Maria Lucilia SALEMA E CARVALHO has resigned from the European Statistical Advisory Committee as a directly appointed member representing the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Ms Maria Lucilia SALEMA E CARVALHO has resigned from the European Statistical Advisory Committee as a directly appointed member representing the Council.

| (2) | In the light of the resignation, the Council has decided to appoint Mr Maurizio VICHI as the member representing the Council in the European Statistical Advisory Committee, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In the light of the resignation, the Council has decided to appoint Mr Maurizio VICHI as the member representing the Council in the European Statistical Advisory Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Maurizio VICHI is hereby appointed as the member representing the Council in the European Statistical Advisory Committee.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 April 2013.

Done at Luxembourg, 22 April 2013.

For the Council

The President

E. GILMORE

---

(1)  OJ L 73, 15.3.2008, p. 13.

1

---
# L_2013183EN.01001001.xml

| 2.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 183/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 183/10

---

COUNCIL DECISION

taken by common accord with the President of the Commission

of 1 July 2013

appointing a Member of the European Commission

(2013/344/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Republic of Croatia, and in particular Article 21 thereof,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

By common accord with Mr José Manuel DURÃO BARROSO, President of the Commission, the Council hereby appoints Mr Neven MIMICA as Member of the Commission for the period from 1 July 2013 to 31 October 2014.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 1 July 2013.

For the Council

The President

L. LINKEVIČIUS

---

(1)  Opinion of 12 June 2013 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

---
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 222 -CV F IACa r d Se r vic e s, N. A. f/k/a M BN A A m e r ic a Ba nk, N .A . , A ppe lla nt v. Cather ine V. Alloggio , Appellee FR OM T HE C OU N T Y C OU R T A T L A W N O. 2 OF HA YS C OU N T Y NO. 8669 -C , HO NORAB LE LINDA RODRI GUEZ , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N F I A C ard Se rv ic e s, N. A. f/k/a

MB NAAm e ri c a B ank , N. A. , and Cathe ri ne V. Al log g io have f iled an agr eed motion to reve rse, vacate , and remand t he underlying judg ment in this case. The ag ree d motion provides that upon remand, the parties will fi l e m u t u al dismiss als with prejudice . Ac c or din g ly , w e g ra

nt the mot ion and se t a sid e the tr ia l c ourt ’s jud g me nt w ith out r e g ard to t he me ri ts and re mand the c a se to t

he tr ia l c ourt

fo r r e nd iti on of judg me nt i n a c c or da nc e wi th t

he pa rt ie s’ ag ree ment. SeeTex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (2)( B) .

____________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Waldrop Vac ated a nd Remanded Filed: De cembe r 14, 2007
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Cashier of Communitycorp (the Company), each certify
that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: |  | March 25, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook                   
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | W. Roger Crook                       
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|      |  |                |  | 
|Date: |  | March 25, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton              
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Gwendolyn P. Bunton                  
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President and Cashier
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5164 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5164

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical that is used for 
                     dyeing apparel home textiles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

Mr. Brady of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical that is used for 
                     dyeing apparel home textiles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHEMICAL THAT IS USED FOR DYEING APPAREL HOME TEXTILES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Bis[2-[[5-          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (aminosulfonyl)-2-                                                 31/2011.......
                          hydroxyphenyl]azo
                          ]-3-oxo-N-
                          phenylbutyramidat
                          o(2-)]cobaltate(1-
                          ) sodium; 3-
                          Hydroxy-2-(2-
                          hydroxy-5-
                          sulfamoylphenylaz
                          o)isocrotonanilid
                          e cobalt(III)
                          chelates sodium
                          salt (CAS Nos.
                          72496-88-9)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3204.12.45)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           9,733
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,527
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    118,702
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,199
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,992
<LOANS>                                        548,722
<ALLOWANCE>                                      5,342
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 716,129
<DEPOSITS>                                     395,976
<SHORT-TERM>                                    37,265
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,671
<LONG-TERM>                                    222,977
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 716,129
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,706
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,372
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   201
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,279
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,501
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,919
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,360
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      420
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  76
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,181
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,181
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,099
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.34
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,334
<LOANS-PAST>                                       494
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   109
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  6,537
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,165
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      105
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                5,342
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             5,342
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          5,279


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.15

                                STATE OF DELAWARE
                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                      RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

The corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware does hereby certify:

FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of ORTHOMETRIX, INC. on June
14, 2005 resolutions were duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation, declaring said
amendment to be advisable and calling a meeting of the stockholders of said
corporation for consideration thereof. The resolution setting forth the proposed
amendment is as follows:

RESOLVED, that the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be
amended by striking out the first sentence of the Article thereof numbered
"FOURTH" and by substituting in lieu of said sentence the following:

         "FOURTH: The total number of shares of all classes of capital stock
         which the Corporation shall have authority to issue is seventy-six
         million (76,000,000) shares, consisting of the following classes of
         stock: (A) one million (1,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock, par value
         $.0005 per share ("Preferred Stock"); and (B) seventy-five million
         (75,000,000) shares of Common Stock, par value $.0005 per share
         ("Common Stock")."

SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, a
special meeting of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held
upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by
statute were voted in favor of the amendment.

THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this certificate to be signed
this 27th day of July, 2005.

                                      By: /s/ Neil H. Koenig
                                          ----------------------------------
                                          Name: Neil H. Koenig
                                          Title:  Chief Financial Officer
BULLINS v. WALKER.

No. COA05-1446.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 20, 2006.

Certification Date July 10, 2006.

Appeal from Wilkes (05CVS248).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.