Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules 49217

5922T01G02, 5922T01G04, 5922T01G05, 

6020T62G04, 6020T62G05, 6078T00G01, 

6078T57G01, 6078T57G02, 6078T57G03, 

6078T57G04, 6078T57G05, and 6078T57G06, 

that are listed by P/N and serial number (SN) 

in the following Table 1 of this AD and that 

have less than 8,000 cycles-since-new (CSN) 

on the effective date of this AD, replace fan 

disk P/N’s before accumulating 8,000 CSN:

TABLE 1.—FAN DISKS THAT REQUIRE

REMOVAL BASED ON BLENDED

CALLOUTS

Disk part No. Disk serial 

No. 

6078T57G02 .......................... GAT6306N 

6078T00G01 .......................... GAT3860G 

6078T57G02 .......................... GAT1924L 

5922T01G04 .......................... GAT9599G 

6078T57G04 .......................... GEE05831 

TABLE 1.—FAN DISKS THAT REQUIRE

REMOVAL BASED ON BLENDED

CALLOUTS—Continued

Disk part No. Disk serial 

No. 

6078T57G04 .......................... GEE06612 

6078T57G04 .......................... GEE06618 

6078T57G04 .......................... GEE06974 

6078T57G04 .......................... GEE06980 

6078T57G05 .......................... GEE143FY 

6078T57G05 .......................... GEE1453G 

6078T57G05 .......................... GEE14452 

6078T57G05 .......................... GEE145NA 

6078T57G04 .......................... GEE08086 

6078T57G04 .......................... GEE09287 

6078T57G04 .......................... GEE09337 

6078T57G05 .......................... GEE12720 

6078T57G05 .......................... GEE14214 

6078T57G05 .......................... GEE142YT 

6078T57G05 .......................... GEE146GT 

(g) For disks with SN’s listed in Table 1 of 

this AD that have 8,000 CSN or greater on the 

effective date of this AD, replace the disk 

within 30 days after the effective date of this 

AD. 

Inspection of All Other Fan Disks 

(h) Inspect all other fan disks, P/N’s 

5921T18G01, 5921T18G09, 5921T18G10, 

5921T54G01, 5922T01G02, 5922T01G04, 

5922T01G05, 6020T62G04, 6020T62G05, 

6078T00G01, 6078T57G01, 6078T57G02, 

6078T57G03, 6078T57G04, 6078T57G05, and 

6078T57G06 in accordance with paragraphs 

3.A.(1) through 3.E.(2) of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Alert 

Service Bulletin (ASB) CF34–BJ 72–A0088, 

Revision 1, dated October 30, 2000 or 

paragraphs 3.A.(1) through 3.A.(2)(f) of the 

Accomplishment Instructions of ASB CF34–

AL 72–A0103, dated August 4, 2000. Use the 

compliance times specified in the following 

Table 2:

TABLE 2.—FAN DISK INSPECTION COMPLIANCE TIMES

Fan disk operating CSN Inspect by 

(1) Fewer than 8,000 CSN or the effective date of this AD .................... Before accumulating 8,000 CSN or by the next hot section inspection 

after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs earlier. 

(2) 8,000 CSN or greater on the effective date of this AD ...................... Within 120 days after the effective date of this AD. 

Definitions 

(i) For the purposes of this AD, the 

following definitions apply: 

(1) A serviceable fan disk is defined as a 

fan disk that has been inspected as specified 

in paragraph (h) of this AD and is not listed 

in Table 1 of this AD. 

(2) Cycles-since-new for fan disk P/N’s 

5922T01G04 or 5922T01G05 is defined as 

total cycles accrued since new as P/N 

6078T57G02 or 6078T57G03, added to total 

cycles accrued after modification from P/N 

6078T57G02 or 6078T57G03. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(j) The Manager, Engine Certification 

Office, has the authority to approve 

alternative methods of compliance for this 

AD if requested using the procedures found 

in 14 CFR 39.19.Special Flight Permits 

Related Information 

(k) None.

Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on 

August 17, 2005. 

Richard Noll, 

Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 05–16709 Filed 8–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2005–20712; Directorate 

Identifier 2005–CE–15–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Raytheon 

Aircraft Company, Model 390, Premier 

1 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a 

new airworthiness directive (AD) for 

certain Raytheon Aircraft Company 

(Raytheon), Model 390, Premier 1 

airplanes. For certain airplanes, this 

proposed AD would require you (unless 

already done) to replace the plastic 

cover over the air conditioning motor 

module with a metallic cover and 

modify the air conditioning compressor 

motor module electromagnetic 

interference-radio frequency 

interference (EMI–RFI) filter located 

under the cover and reidentify the 

module part number. For all airplanes, 

the proposed AD would limit future 

installations of the cover for the air 

conditioner and the air conditioning 

compressor motor module. This 

proposed AD results from reports that 

the plastic cover over the air 

conditioning motor module was found 

melted or burned and that the 

overheating of the EMI–RFI filter 

assembly located under the cover 

caused this damage. We are issuing this 

proposed AD to prevent the melting or 

burning of the plastic cover. The 

burning of the plastic cover could result 

in a fire.

DATES: We must receive any comments 

on this proposed AD by October 21, 

2005.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following to 

submit comments on this proposed AD: 

• DOT Docket Web site: Go to

http://dms.dot.gov and follow the 

instructions for sending your comments 

electronically. 

• Government-wide rulemaking Web 

site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov

and follow the instructions for sending 

your comments electronically. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility; 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, 

Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–

001. 

• Fax: 1–202–493–2251. 

• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on 

the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 

400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 

DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

To get the service information 

identified in this proposed AD, contact 

Raytheon Aircraft Company, PO Box 85, 

49218 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules 

Wichita, Kansas 67201–0085; telephone: 

(800) 625–7043. 

To view the comments to this 

proposed AD, go to http://dms.dot.gov.

The docket number is FAA–2005–

20712; Directorate Identifier 2005–CE–

15–AD.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Philip Petty, Aerospace Engineer, ACE–

119W, Wichita Aircraft Certification 

Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, 

Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 

946–4139; facsimile: (316) 946–4107.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comments Invited 

How do I comment on this proposed 

AD? We invite you to submit any 

written relevant data, views, or 

arguments regarding this proposal. Send 

your comments to an address listed 

under ADDRESSES. Include the docket 

number, ‘‘FAA–2005–20712; Directorate 

Identifier 2005–CE–15–AD’’ at the 

beginning of your comments. We will 

post all comments we receive, without 

change, to http://dms.dot.gov, including 

any personal information you provide. 

We will also post a report summarizing 

each substantive verbal contact with 

FAA personnel concerning this 

proposed rulemaking. Using the search 

function of our docket web site, anyone 

can find and read the comments 

received into any of our dockets, 

including the name of the individual 

who sent the comment (or signed the 

comment on behalf of an association, 

business, labor union, etc.). This is 

docket number FAA–2005–20712; 

Directorate Identifier 2005–CE–15–AD. 

You may review the DOT’s complete 

Privacy Act Statement in the Federal 

Register published on April 11, 2000 

(65 FR 19477–78) or you may visit

http://dms.dot.gov.

Are there any specific portions of this 

proposed AD I should pay attention to?

We specifically invite comments on the 

overall regulatory, economic, 

environmental, and energy aspects of 

this proposed AD. If you contact us 

through a nonwritten communication 

and that contact relates to a substantive 

part of this proposed AD, we will 

summarize the contact and place the 

summary in the docket. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD in light of those comments 

and contacts. 

Docket Information 

Where can I go to view the docket 

information? You may view the AD 

docket that contains the proposal, any 

comments received, and any final 

disposition in person at the DMS Docket 

Offices between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. 

(eastern time), Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The Docket 

Office (telephone 1–800–647–5227) is 

located on the plaza level of the 

Department of Transportation NASSIF 

Building at the street address stated in 

ADDRESSES. You may also view the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

dms.dot.gov. The comments will be 

available in the AD docket shortly after 

the DMS receives them. 

Discussion 

What events have caused this 

proposed AD? The FAA has received 

reports that the plastic cover over the air 

conditioning motor module for certain 

Raytheon Aircraft Company (Raytheon), 

Model 390, Premier 1 airplanes was 

found melted or burned. The 

overheating of the electromagnetic 

interference-radio frequency 

interference (EMI–RFI) filter assembly 

located under the plastic cover caused 

this damage. 

Raytheon has developed two partial 

fixes that together remedy the problem. 

In February 2005, Raytheon 

implemented a partial fix to the problem 

with a service bulletin for the 

replacement of the plastic cover with a 

manufactured or a field fabricated metal 

cover. Raytheon, in June 2005, issued a 

service bulletin for the modification of 

the EMI–RFI filter assembly. 

What is the potential impact if FAA 

took no action? The burning of the 

plastic cover could result in a fire. 

Is there service information that 

applies to this subject? Raytheon has 

issued:

—Service Bulletin No. SB 21–3715, 

dated February 2005: Includes 

procedures for replacing the plastic 

cover over the air conditioning motor 

module with a metallic cover (part 

number ((P/N) 390–555015–0001) and 

doing the field fabrication of the 

metallic cover (P/N 390–555015–

0001); and 

—Service Bulletin No. SB 21–3733, 

dated June 2005: This Raytheon 

service bulletin includes Enviro 

Systems Inc. Service Bulletin No. 

SB05–101, Revision B, dated April 27, 

2005. These service bulletins include 

procedures for doing the modification 

of the air conditioning compressor 

motor module EMI–RFI filter and 

reidentifying the module part number. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

What has FAA decided? We have 

evaluated all pertinent information and 

identified an unsafe condition that is 

likely to exist or develop on other 

products of this same type design. For 

this reason, we are proposing AD action. 

What would this proposed AD 

require? This proposed AD would 

require you to:

—Replace the plastic cover over the air 

conditioning motor module with a 

metallic cover (P/N 390–555015–

0001) for certain airplanes;

—Modify the air conditioning 

compressor motor module EMI–RFI 

filter and reidentify the module part 

number for certain airplanes; and 

—Limit future installations of the cover 

for the air conditioner and the air 

conditioning compressor motor 

module for all airplanes.

How does the revision to 14 CFR part 

39 affect this proposed AD? On July 10, 

2002, we published a new version of 14 

CFR part 39 (67 FR 47997, July 22, 

2002), which governs FAA’s AD system. 

This regulation now includes material 

that relates to altered products, special 

flight permits, and alternative methods 

of compliance. This material previously 

was included in each individual AD. 

Since this material is included in 14 

CFR part 39, we will not include it in 

future AD actions. 

Costs of Compliance 

How many airplanes would this 

proposed AD impact? We estimate that 

this proposed AD affects 100 airplanes 

in the U.S. registry. 

What would be the cost impact of this 

proposed AD on owners/operators of the 

affected airplanes? We estimate the 

following costs to do this proposed 

replacement of the plastic cover with a 

new manufactured metallic cover (P/N 

390–555015–0001, or FAA-approved 

equivalent part number) that you buy:

Labor cost Parts cost Total cost per 

airplane 

Total cost on 

U.S. operators 

1 work hour × $65 = $65 ............................................................................................................. $600 $665 $66,500 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules 49219

We estimate the following costs to do 

the field fabrication of the metallic 

cover (P/N 390–555015–0001) if you 

choose not to buy a new metallic cover 

and the proposed labor for the 

replacement of the plastic cover:

Labor cost Parts cost Total cost per 

airplane 

Total cost on 

U.S. operators 

16 work hour × $65 = $1,040 ...................................................................................................... $20 $1,060 $106,000 

We estimate the following costs to 

modify the air conditioning compressor 

motor module EMI–RFI filter and 

reidentify the module part number:

Labor cost Parts cost Total cost per 

airplane 

Total cost on 

U.S. operators 

2 work hours × $65 = $130 ......................................................................................................... $600 $730 $73,000 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

What authority does FAA have for 

issuing this rulemaking action? Title 49 

of the United States Code specifies the 

FAA’s authority to issue rules on 

aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106 

describes the authority of the FAA 

Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation 

Programs, describes in more detail the 

scope of the agency’s authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in subtitle VII, 

part A, subpart III, section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this AD. 

Regulatory Findings 

Would this proposed AD impact 

various entities? We have determined 

that this proposed AD would not have 

federalism implications under Executive 

Order 13132. This proposed AD would 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national Government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

Would this proposed AD involve a 

significant rule or regulatory action? For 

the reasons discussed above, I certify 

that this proposed AD: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

3. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a summary of the costs 

to comply with this proposed AD (and 

other information as included in the 

Regulatory Evaluation) and placed it in 

the AD Docket. You may get a copy of 

this summary by sending a request to us 

at the address listed under ADDRESSES.

Include ‘‘AD Docket FAA–2005–20712; 

Directorate Identifier 2005–CE–15–AD’’

in your request.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the Federal Aviation Administration 

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows:

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD):

Raytheon Aircraft Company: Docket No. 

FAA–2005–20712; Directorate Identifier 

2005–CE–15–AD 

When Is the Last Date I Can Submit 

Comments on This Proposed AD? 

(a) We must receive comments on this 

proposed airworthiness directive (AD) by 

October 21, 2005. 

What Other ADs Are Affected by This 

Action? 

(b) None. 

What Airplanes Are Affected By This AD? 

(c) This AD applies to the following 

airplane models and serial numbers that are 

certificated in any category: 

(1) Group 1: Raytheon Aircraft Company, 

Model 390, Premier 1 Airplanes, serial 

numbers RB–1, RB–4 through RB–101, RB–

103 through RB–119, and RB–121, that have 

not replaced the plastic cover over the 

compressor motor module with a metallic 

one (part number (P/N) 390–555015–0001, or 

FAA-approved equivalent part number). 

(2) Group 2: Raytheon Aircraft Company, 

Model 390, Premier 1 Airplanes, serial 

numbers RB–1, RB–4 through RB–101, RB–

103 through RB–119, and RB–121, that have 

installed the metallic cover (P/N 390–

555015–0001, or FAA-approved equivalent 

part number). 

(3) Group 3: Raytheon Aircraft Company, 

Model 390, Premier 1 Airplanes, serial 

numbers RB–120 and RB–122 through RB–

129. 

What Is the Unsafe Condition Presented in 

This AD? 

(d) This AD is the result of reports that the 

plastic cover over the air conditioning motor 

module was found melted or burned and that 

the overheating of the electromagnetic 

interference-radio frequency interference 

(EMI–RFI) filter assembly located under the 

cover caused this damage. The actions 

specified in this AD are intended to prevent 

the melting or burning of the plastic cover. 

The burning of the plastic cover could result 

in a fire. 

What Must I Do To Address This Problem? 

(e) What actions must I do to address this 

problem for Group 1 airplanes? To address 

this problem for Group 1 airplanes, you must 

do the following:

49220 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules 

Actions Compliance Procedures 

(1) Air Conditioning Motor Module Cover Replacement: Replace the plastic cover over 

the air conditioning motor module with a new 

or fabricated metallic cover. You may use 

Raytheon part number (P/N) 390–555015–

0001.

Within 30 days after the effective date of this 

AD, unless already done.

Follow Raytheon Aircraft Company Service 

Bulletin No. SB 21–3715, dated February 

2005. 

(2) Air Conditioning Compressor Motor Module 

EMI–RFI Filter Modification: Modify the air 

conditioning motor module EMI–RFI filter and 

reidentify the module part number with a P/N 

390–385026–0003 module.

Within 30 days after the effective date of this 

AD, unless already done.

Follow Raytheon Aircraft Company Service 

Bulletin No. SB 21–3733, dated June 2005; 

and Enviro Systems Inc. Service Bulletin 

No. SB05–101, Revision B, dated April 27, 

2005. 

(3) Future Installations—Cover for Air Conditioner: You must only install a metal cover 

over the air conditioning motor module. This 

is mandatory equipment.

As of the effective date of this AD ................... Follow Raytheon Aircraft Company Service 

Bulletin No. SB 21–3715, dated February 

2005. 

(4) Future Installations—Air Conditioning Compressor Motor Module: Do not install any 

compressor motor module, P/N 390–385026–

0001.

As of the effective date of this AD ................... Not Applicable. 

(f) What actions must I do to address this 

problem for Group 2 airplanes? To address 

this problem for Group 2 airplanes, you must 

do the following:

Actions Compliance Procedures 

(1) Air Conditioning Compressor Motor Module 

EMI–RFI Filter Modification: Modify the air 

conditioning motor module EMI–RFI filter and 

reidentify the module part number with a P/N 

390–385026–0003 module.

Within 60 days after the effective date of this 

AD, unless already done.

Follow Raytheon the Aircraft Company Service Bulletin No. SB 21–3733, dated June 

2005; and Enviro Systems Inc. Service Bulletin No. SB05–101, Revision B, dated April 

27, 2005. 

(2) Future Installations—Cover for Air Conditioner: You must only install a metal cover 

over the air conditioning motor module. This 

is mandatory equipment.

As of the effective date of this AD ................... Follow Raytheon Aircraft Company Service 

Bulletin No. SB 21–3715, dated February 

2005. 

(3) Future Installations—Air Conditioning Compressor Motor Module: Do not install any 

compressor motor module, P/N 390–385026–

0001.

As of the effective date of this AD ................... Not Applicable. 

(g) What actions must I do to address this 

problem for Group 3 airplanes? To address 

this problem for Group 3 airplanes, you must 

do the following:

Actions Compliance Procedures 

(1) Air Conditioning Compressor Motor Module 

EMI–RFI Filter Modification: Modify the air 

conditioning motor module EMI–RFI filter and 

reidentify the module part number with a P/N 

390–385026–0003 module.

Within 60 days after the effective date of this 

AD, unless already done.

Follow Raytheon Aircraft Company Service 

Bulletin No. SB 21–3733, dated June 2005; 

and Enviro Systems Inc. Service Bulletin 

No. SB05–101, Revision B, dated April 27, 

2005. 

(2) Future Installations—Cover for Air Conditioner: You must only install a metal cover 

over the air conditioning motor module. This 

is mandatory equipment.

As of the effective date of this AD ................... Follow Raytheon Aircraft Company Service 

Bulletin No. SB 21–3715, dated February 

2005. 

(3) Future Installations—Air Conditioning Compressor Motor Module: Do not install any 

compressor motor module, P/N 390–385026–

0001.

As of the effective date of this AD ................... Not Applicable. 

May I Request an Alternative Method of 

Compliance? 

(h) You may request a different method of 

compliance or a different compliance time 

for this AD by following the procedures in 14 

CFR 39.19. Unless FAA authorizes otherwise, 

send your request to your principal 

inspector. The principal inspector may add 

comments and will send your request to the 

Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office 

(ACO), FAA. For information on any already 

approved alternative methods of compliance, 

contact Philip Petty, Aerospace Engineer, 

ACE–119W, Wichita ACO, 1801 Airport 

Road, Room 100, Wichita, Kansas 67209; 

telephone: (316) 946–4139; facsimile: (316) 

946–4107. 

May I Get Copies of the Documents 

Referenced in This AD? 

(i) To get copies of the documents 

referenced in this AD, contact Raytheon 

Aircraft Company, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, 

Kansas 67201–0085; telephone: (800) 625–

7043. To view the AD docket, go to the 

Docket Management Facility; U.S. 

Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh 

Street, S.W., Nassif Building, Room PL–401, 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 23, 2005 / Proposed Rules 49221

Washington, DC, or on the Internet at

http://dms.dot.gov. The docket number is 

Docket No. FAA–2005–20712; Directorate 

Identifier 2005–CE–15–AD.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on August 

16, 2005. 

Terry L. Chasteen, 

Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 05–16708 Filed 8–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

Planned Modification of the LambertSt. Louis International Airport Class B 

Airspace Area; MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of public 

meetings. 

SUMMARY: This document announces 

two fact-finding informal airspace 

meetings to solicit information from 

airspace users, and others, concerning a 

proposal to modify the Class B airspace 

area at the Lambert-St. Louis 

International Airport terminal area, St. 

Louis, Missouri. The proposed 

modifications are a result of the new 

runway (11/29) project underway at 

Lambert-St. Louis International Airport. 

Additionally, the proposed 

modifications are intended to enhance 

traffic flow management and ensure that 

all instrument procedures are contained 

within Class B airspace. The FAA is 

holding these meetings to provide 

interested parties an opportunity to 

present recommendations and 

comments on the proposal. All 

comments received during these 

meetings will be considered prior to any 

issuance of a notice of proposed 

rulemaking.

DATES: These informal airspace 

meetings will be held on Wednesday, 

October 19, 2005, from 4 p.m.–6 p.m. 

and 7 p.m.–9 p.m.; and Thursday, 

October 20, 2005, from 7 p.m.–9 p.m. 

Comments must be received on or 

before October 27, 2005.

ADDRESSES: On Wednesday, October 19, 

2005, the meetings will be held at the 

Chesterfield City Hall, 690 Chesterfield 

Parkway West, Chesterfield, MO 63017. 

On Thursday, October 20, 2005, the 

meeting will be held at the Holiday InnCollinsville, 1000 Eastport Drive, 

Collinsville, IL 62234. 

Comments: Send comments on the 

proposal to: David Sapadin, Manager, 

Airspace and Procedures, by e-mail at 

david.m.sapadin@faa.gov or by fax to 

(847) 294–7457.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Greg Barrett, St. Louis TRACON (T–25), 

22 Research Court, St. Charles, MO, 

63304; telephone: (314) 890–1040.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Meeting Procedures 

(a) These meetings will be informal in 

nature and will be conducted by one or 

more representatives of the FAA Central 

Region. A representative from the FAA 

will present a formal briefing on the 

planned modification of the Class B 

airspace area at the Lambert-St. Louis 

International Airport. Participants will 

be given an opportunity to deliver 

comments or make a presentation. Only 

comments concerning the plan to 

modify the Lambert-St. Louis 

International Airport, Class B airspace 

area will be accepted. 

(b) These meetings will be open to all 

persons on a space-available basis. 

There will be no admission fee or other 

charge to attend and participate. 

(c) Any person wishing to make a 

presentation to the FAA panel will be 

asked to sign in and estimate the 

amount of time needed for such 

presentation. This will permit the panel 

to allocate an appropriate amount of 

time for each presenter. These meetings 

will not be adjourned until everyone on 

the list has had an opportunity to 

address the panel. 

(d) Position papers or other handout 

material relating to the substance of 

these meetings will be accepted. 

Participants wishing to submit handout 

material should present an original and 

two copies (3 copies total) to the 

presiding officer. There should be 

additional copies of each handout 

available for other attendees. 

(e) These meetings will not be 

formally recorded. 

Agenda for the Meetings 

—Sign-in. 

—Presentation of Meeting Procedures. 

—FAA explanation of the proposed 

Class B modifications. 

—Public Presentations and Discussions. 

—Written comment turn-in. 

—Closing Comments.

Issued in Washington, DC, August 16, 

2005. 

Edith V. Parish, 

Acting Manager, Airspace and Rules.

[FR Doc. 05–16743 Filed 8–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA–2005–22100 Airspace 

Docket No. 05–AEA–16] 

Proposed Amendment to Class E 

Airspace; Binghampton, NY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking

SUMMARY: This notice proposes to 

amend the Class E airspace area in the 

Binghampton, NY area. The 

development of multiple area navigation 

(RNAV) Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures (SIAP) for numerous airports 

within the Binghampton, NY area with 

approved Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) 

operations and the resulting overlap of 

designated Class E–5 airspace have 

made this proposal necessary. The 

proposal would correct the name of the 

airport and update the Airport 

Reference Point (ARP). The proposal 

would consolidate the Class E–5 

airspace designations for six airports in 

the Binghampton area and result in the 

rescission of five separate Class E–5 

descriptions through separate 

rulemaking action. The area would be 

depicted on aeronautical charts for pilot 

reference.

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before September 22, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on the 

proposal to the Docket Management 

System, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20590–0001. You must identify the 

docket number FAA–2005–22100/

Airspace Docket No. 05–AEA–16 at the 

beginning of your comments. You may 

also submit comments on the Internet at 

http://dms.dot.gov. You may review the 

public docket containing the proposal, 

any comments received, and any final 

disposition in person in the Dockets 

Office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 

1–800–647–5527) is on the plaza level 

of the Department of Transportation 

NASSIF Building at the above address. 

An information docket may also be 

examined during normal business hours 

at the office of the Director, Eastern 

Terminal Operations, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Eastern Region, 1 

Aviation Plaza, Jamaica, NY 11434–

4809.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Francis T. Jordan, Jr., Airspace