49194 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 2102

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Sunshine Act.

This document was prepared under 

the direction of Thomas Luebke, 

Secretary. U.S. Commission of Fine 

Arts, 401 F Street, NW., Suite 312, 

Washington, DC 20001.

■ Accordingly, for the reasons set forth 

above, Part 2102 is amended as set forth 

below.

■ For the reasons stated in the preamble, 

the Commission of Fine Arts hereby 

amends 45 CFR 2102, Subpart B—

Procedures on Submission of Plans or 

Designs, with the addition of the 

following sections to read:

PART 2102—MEETINGS AND 

PROCEDURES OF THE COMMISSION

■ 1. The authority citation for part 2102 

is revised to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C., App. 1.

■ 2. Add § 2102.13 to Part 2102, Subpart 

B—Procedures on Submission of Plans 

or Designs, to read as follows:

§ 2102.13 Project eligibility criteria for 

placement on a Consent Calendar. 

With respect to submissions to the 

Commission for projects that meet the 

following criteria, the Secretary, at his/

her discretion and in coordination with 

the Commission’s staff, may place these 

projects on a Consent Calendar 

according to § 2102.14. 

(a) Additions to buildings of less than 

25 percent (%) of the original structure 

and no more than 25,000 sq. ft.; 

(b) New construction of less than 

25,000 sq. ft.; 

(c) Window replacement projects;

(d) Cellular or other communications 

antenna installations or replacements; 

(e) New or replacement signs; 

(f) Cleaning, routine maintenance, 

repairs or replacement-in-kind of 

exterior finish materials; 

(g) Temporary utility or construction 

structures; 

(h) And does not include new 

physical perimeter security items.

■ 3. Add § 2102.14 to Part 2102, Subpart 

B—Procedures on Submission of Plans 

or Designs, to read as follows:

§ 2102.14 Consent Calendar and 

Appendices procedures. 

(a) The Commission shall review 

applications scheduled on its Meeting 

Agenda, Consent Calendar, or 

Appendices (Old Georgetown Act and 

Shipstead-Luce Act). Cases on the 

Meeting Agenda will be heard by the 

Commission in open session. Cases on 

the Consent Calendar or Appendices 

will be acted upon based on submitted 

materials and staff recommendations 

without further public comment. 

(b) The Commission shall release the 

proposed Meeting Agenda, and the 

Consent Calendar and Appendices with 

staff recommendation to the public not 

later than five (5) calendar days before 

the meeting. 

(c) The scheduling of cases on the 

Meeting Agenda, Consent Calendar, and 

Appendices shall be at the sole 

discretion of the Commission and staff, 

and nothing shall preclude the 

Commission from amending or changing 

the scheduling at a public meeting. 

(d) The staff shall prepare a written 

recommendation for each case on the 

Consent Calendar or Appendices the 

Commission will review. 

(e) The Commission shall conduct 

public review of cases in accordance 

with a proposed Agenda released to the 

public before the Commission meeting. 

The Commission shall dispose of other 

cases by adoption of a Consent Calendar 

and Appendices, as appropriate. The 

Commission may amend the Meeting 

Agenda, Consent Calendar and 

Appendices at the public meeting as it 

may deem appropriate. 

(f) An application may be placed on 

the Consent Calendar if the applicant 

and staff agree that the proposed work 

has no known objection by an affected 

government agency, neighborhood 

organization, historic preservation 

organization, or affected person. Any 

relevant terms or modifications agreed 

upon by the applicant and staff may be 

included as conditions of the approval. 

(g) At the request of any Commission 

member, the Chairperson may remove 

any case from the Consent Calendar and 

place it on the Meeting Agenda for 

individual consideration by the 

Commission at the meeting. A request 

from any other group or person to 

remove a case from the Consent 

Calendar should be made to the staff in 

advance of the meeting and shall be 

considered as a preliminary matter at 

the meeting. 

(h) The Chairperson may also remove 

any case from a duly noticed Meeting 

Agenda and place it on the Consent 

Calendar, provided there is no objection 

from the applicant, any Commission 

member, or any affected group or person 

present and wishing to comment on the 

case. 

(i) The Commission may approve the 

Consent Calendar and Appendices on a 

voice vote.

Dated: August 18, 2005. 

Thomas Luebke, 

Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts.

[FR Doc. 05–16712 Filed 8–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6330–01–P

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service 

50 CFR Part 20

RIN 1018–AT87

Migratory Bird Hunting; Approval of 

Iron-Tungsten-Nickel Shot as Nontoxic 

for Hunting Waterfowl and Coots

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, 

Interior.

ACTION: Final rule; availability of Final 

Environmental Assessment and Finding 

of No Significant Impact. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service (we, us, or USFWS) approves 

shot formulated of 62 percent iron, 25 

percent tungsten, and 13 percent nickel 

as nontoxic for waterfowl and coot 

hunting in the United States. We 

assessed possible toxicity effects of the 

Iron-Tungsten-Nickel (ITN) shot, and 

determined that it is not a threat to 

wildlife or their habitats, and that 

further testing of ITN shot is not 

necessary. We have prepared a Final 

Environmental Assessment and a 

Finding of No Significant Impact in 

support of this decision. 

This rule also corrects an error and 

adds clarity to the list of currently 

approved nontoxic shot types.

DATES: This rule takes effect on 

September 22, 2005.

ADDRESSES: The Final Environmental 

Assessment for approval of ITN shot 

and the associated Finding of No 

Significant Impact are available from the 

Division of Migratory Bird Management, 

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4501 

North Fairfax Drive, Room 4091, 

Arlington, Virginia 22203–1610. You 

may call 703–358–1825 to request 

copies. 

The complete file for this rule is 

available, by appointment, during 

normal business hours at the same 

address. You may call 703–358–1825 to 

make an appointment to view the files.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

George T. Allen, Division of Migratory 

Bird Management, 703–358–1714.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 

(Act) (16 U.S.C. 703–711) and the Fish 

and Wildlife Improvement Act of 1978 

(16 U.S.C. 712) implement migratory 

bird treaties between the United States 

and Great Britain for Canada (1916 and 

1996 as amended), Mexico (1936 and 

1972 as amended), Japan (1972 and 

1974 as amended), and Russia (then the 

Soviet Union, 1978). These treaties 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 49195

protect certain migratory birds from 

take, except as permitted under the 

Acts. The Acts authorize the Secretary 

of the Interior to regulate take of 

migratory birds in the United States. 

Under this authority, the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service controls the hunting of 

migratory game birds through 

regulations in 50 CFR part 20. 

Deposition of toxic shot and release of 

toxic shot components in waterfowl 

hunting locations are potentially 

harmful to many organisms. Research 

has shown that ingested spent lead shot 

causes significant mortality in migratory 

birds. Since the mid-1970s, we have 

sought to identify shot types that do not 

pose significant toxicity hazards to 

migratory birds or other wildlife. We 

addressed the issue of lead poisoning in 

waterfowl in an Environmental Impact 

Statement in 1976, and again in a 1986 

supplemental EIS. The 1986 document 

provided the scientific justification for a 

ban on the use of lead shot and the 

subsequent approval of steel shot for 

hunting waterfowl and coots that began 

that year, with a complete ban of lead 

for waterfowl and coot hunting in 1991. 

We have continued to consider other 

potential candidates for approval as 

nontoxic shot. We are obligated to 

review applications for approval of 

alternative shot types as nontoxic for 

hunting waterfowl and coots. 

We received an application from 

ENVIRON-Metal, Inc. of Sweet Home, 

Oregon, for approval of Iron-TungstenNickel shot formulated as 62 percent 

iron, 25 percent tungsten, and 13 

percent nickel by weight for waterfowl 

and coot hunting. We reviewed the shot 

under the criteria in Tier 1 of the 

revised nontoxic shot approval 

procedures contained in 50 CFR 20.134 

for permanent approval of shot as 

nontoxic for hunting waterfowl and 

coots. We amend 50 CFR 20.21(j) to add 

ITN shot to the list of the approved 

types of shot for waterfowl and coot 

hunting. 

On May 6, 2005, we published a 

proposed rule to approve ITN as a 

nontoxic shot type (70 FR 23954). The 

application for the approval of ITN shot 

included information on chemical 

characterization, production variability, 

use, expected production volume, 

toxicological effects, environmental fate 

and transport, and evaluation, and the 

proposed rule included this 

information, a comprehensive 

evaluation of the likely effects of each 

shot, and an assessment of the affected 

environment. 

The Director of the U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service has concluded that the 

spent shot material will not pose a 

significant danger to migratory birds or 

other wildlife or their habitats, and 

therefore approves the use of IronTungsten-Nickel shot as nontoxic for 

hunting waterfowl and coots. 

We received one comment in 

response to the proposed rule. However, 

the commenter did not raise any issues 

that caused us to reconsider our 

proposed approval of ITN shot as 

nontoxic. Neither manufacturing the 

shot nor firing shotshells containing the 

shot will alter the metals or increase 

their susceptibility to dissolving in the 

environment. 

ENVIRON-Metal estimates that the 

volume of ITN shot used hunting 

migratory birds in the United States will 

be approximately 200,000 pounds 

(90,719 kilograms) during the first year 

of sale, and perhaps 500,000 pounds 

(227,000 kg) per year thereafter. 

This rule also corrects the formulation 

of Tungsten-Tin-Bismuth (TTB) shot. 

We inadvertently left out the iron in the 

TTB formulation in our August 9, 2004, 

approval of the shot type (69 FR 48163). 

The listing of approved nontoxic shot 

types is also changed to provide more 

consistent naming of approved shot 

types. The shot types are now named 

and listed by the predominant metals in 

the alloys.

Cumulative Impacts 

We foresee no negative cumulative 

impacts from approval of this nontoxic 

shot type. Approval of a shot type that 

contains only metals already approved 

as nontoxic will not additionally impact 

the human environment. 

NEPA Consideration 

In compliance with the requirements 

of section 102(2)(C) of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4332(C)), and the Council on 

Environmental Quality’s regulation for 

implementing NEPA (40 CFR 1500–

1508), though all of the metals in this 

shot type have been approved in higher 

concentrations in other shot types and 

are not likely to pose adverse toxicity 

effects on fish, wildlife, their habitats, or 

the human environment, we prepared a 

Draft Environmental Assessment for this 

action, on which we received no 

comments. We have completed the 

Final Environmental Assessment for 

approval of ITN shot as nontoxic. 

Endangered Species Act Considerations 

Section 7 of the Endangered Species 

Act (ESA) of 1972, as amended (16 

U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), provides that 

Federal agencies shall ‘‘insure that any 

action authorized, funded or carried out 

* * * is not likely to jeopardize the 

continued existence of any endangered 

species or threatened species or result in 

the destruction or adverse modification 

of (critical) habitat.’’ We have concluded 

that because all of the metals in this 

shot type have been approved in higher 

concentrations in other shot types and 

should not be available to biota due to 

use of ITN shot, this action will not 

affect endangered or threatened species. 

A Section 7 consultation under the ESA 

for this rule is not needed. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires the 

preparation of flexibility analyses for 

rules that will have a significant effect 

on a substantial number of small 

entities, which includes small 

businesses, organizations, or 

governmental jurisdictions. This rule 

approves an additional type of nontoxic 

shot that may be sold and used to hunt 

migratory birds; this rule would provide 

one shot type in addition to the types 

that are approved. We have determined, 

however, that this rule will have no 

effect on small entities since the 

approved shot merely will supplement 

nontoxic shot already in commerce and 

available throughout the retail and 

wholesale distribution systems. We 

anticipate no dislocation or other local 

effects, with regard to hunters or others. 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act 

This is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 

804(2), the Small Business Regulatory 

Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule 

does not impose an unfunded mandate 

of more than $100 million per year or 

have a significant or unique effect on 

State, local, or tribal governments or the 

private sector because it is the Service’s 

responsibility to regulate the take of 

migratory birds in the United States. 

This rule will not cause a major increase 

in costs or prices for consumers, 

individual industries, Federal, State, or 

local government agencies, or 

geographic regions; it will only affect 

availability of the approved nontoxic 

shot type. Finally, because this rule only 

affects approval of this nontoxic shot 

type, it will not have a significant 

adverse effect on competition, 

employment, investment, productivity, 

innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based 

enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises. 

Executive Order 12866

This rule is not a significant 

regulatory action subject to Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) review 

under Executive Order 12866. This rule 

will not have an annual economic effect 

of $100 million or more or adversely 

affect an economic sector, productivity, 

49196 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 

jobs, the environment, or other units of 

government. Therefore, a cost-benefit 

economic analysis is not required. This 

action will not create inconsistencies 

with other agencies’ actions or 

otherwise interfere with an action taken 

or planned by another agency. No other 

Federal agency has any role in 

regulating nontoxic shot for migratory 

bird hunting. The action is consistent 

with the policies and guidelines of other 

Department of the Interior bureaus. This 

action will not materially affect 

entitlements, grants, user fees, loan 

programs, or the rights and obligations 

of their recipients because it has no 

mechanism to do so. This action will 

not raise novel legal or policy issues 

because the Service has already 

approved several other nontoxic shot 

types. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. We have examined this 

regulation under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501) 

and found it to contain no information 

collection requirements. OMB has 

approved collection of information from 

shot manufacturers for the nontoxic shot 

approval process, and has assigned 

control number 1018–0067, which 

expires on December 31, 2006. For 

further information, see 50 CFR 20.134. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform 

We have determined and certify 

pursuant to the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that 

this rulemaking will not impose a cost 

of $100 million or more in any given 

year on local or State government or 

private entities. 

Civil Justice Reform—Executive Order 

12988

We, in promulgating this rule, have 

determined that these regulations meet 

the applicable standards provided in 

Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive 

Order 12988. 

Takings Implication Assessment 

In accordance with Executive Order 

12630, this rule, authorized by the 

Migratory Bird Treaty Act, does not 

have significant takings implications 

and does not affect any constitutionally 

protected property rights. This rule will 

not result in the physical occupancy of 

property, the physical invasion of 

property, or the regulatory taking of any 

property.

Federalism Effects 

Due to the migratory nature of certain 

species of birds, the Federal 

Government has been given 

responsibility over these species by the 

Migratory Bird Treaty Act. This rule 

does not have a substantial direct effect 

on fiscal capacity, change the roles or 

responsibilities of Federal or State 

governments, or intrude on State policy 

or administration. Therefore, in 

accordance with Executive Order 13132, 

this regulation does not have significant 

federalism effects and does not have 

sufficient federalism implications to 

warrant the preparation of a Federalism 

Assessment. 

Government-to-Government 

Relationship With Tribes 

In accordance with the President’s 

memorandum of April 29, 1994, 

‘‘Government-to-Government Relations 

with Native American Tribal 

Governments’’ (59 FR 22951) and 512 

DM 2, we have determined that this rule 

has no effects on Federally recognized 

Indian tribes.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 20

Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements, 

Transportation, Wildlife.

■ For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, we amend part 20, subchapter 

B, chapter I of title 50 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 20—[AMENDED]

■ 1. The authority citation for part 20 

continues to read as follows:

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703–712; 16 U.S.C. 

742a–j; Pub. L. 106–108.

■ 2. Section 20.21 is amended by 

revising paragraph (j)(1) to read as 

follows:

§ 20.21 What hunting methods are illegal?

* * * * *

(j)(1) While possessing loose shot for 

muzzle loading or shotshells containing 

other than the following approved shot 

types.

Approved shot type Percent composition by weight 

bismuth-tin ................................................................................................ 97 bismuth, 3 tin. 

iron (steel) ................................................................................................. iron and carbon. 

iron-tungsten (2 types) ............................................................................. 60 iron, 40 tungsten and 78 iron, 22 tungsten. 

iron-tungsten-nickel .................................................................................. 62 iron, 25 tungsten, 13 nickel. 

tungsten-bronze ........................................................................................ 51.1 tungsten, 44.4 copper, 3.9 tin, 0.6 iron. 

tungsten-matrix ......................................................................................... 95.9 tungsten, 4.1 polymer. 

tungsten-nickel-iron .................................................................................. 50 tungsten, 35 nickel, 15 iron. 

tungsten-polymer ...................................................................................... 95.5 tungsten, 4.5 Nylon 6 or 11. 

tungsten-tin-bismuth ................................................................................. 49–71 tungsten, 29–51 tin; 0.5–6.5 bismuth, 0.8 iron. 

tungsten-tin-iron-nickel ............................................................................. 65 tungsten, 21.8 tin, 10.4 iron, 2.8 nickel. 

Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 162 / Tuesday, August 23, 2005 / Rules and Regulations 49197

* * * * *

Dated: July 26, 2005. 

Craig Manson, 

Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and 

Parks.

[FR Doc. 05–16720 Filed 8–22–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–55–P

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration

50 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 041126332–5039–02; I.D. 

081705G]

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic 

Zone Off Alaska; Yellowfin Sole by 

Vessels Using Trawl Gear in the Bering 

Sea and Aleutian Islands Management 

Area

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce.

ACTION: Temporary rule; closure.

SUMMARY: NMFS is closing directed 

fishing for yellowfin sole by vessels 

using trawl gear in the Bering Sea and 

Aleutian Islands management area 

(BSAI). This action is necessary to 

prevent exceeding the 2005 halibut 

bycatch allowance specified for the 

trawl yellowfin sole fishery category in 

the BSAI.

DATES: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local 

time (A.l.t.), August 18, 2005, through 

2400 hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh 

Keaton, 907–586–7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS 

manages the groundfish fishery in the 

BSAI according to the Fishery 

Management Plan for Groundfish of the 

Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands 

Management Area (FMP) prepared by 

the North Pacific Fishery Management 

Council under authority of the 

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act. 

Regulations governing fishing by U.S. 

vessels in accordance with the FMP 

appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600 

and 50 CFR part 679.

The 2005 halibut bycatch allowance 

specified for the trawl yellowfin sole 

fishery category in the BSAI is 886 

metric tons as established by the 2005 

and 2006 final harvest specifications for 

groundfish in the BSAI (70 FR 8979, 

February 24, 2005).

In accordance with § 679.21(e)(7)(v), 

the Administrator, Alaska Region, 

NMFS, has determined that the 2005 

halibut bycatch allowance specified for 

the trawl yellowfin sole fishery category 

in the BSAI has been caught. 

Consequently, NMFS is closing directed 

fishing for yellowfin sole by vessels 

using trawl gear in the BSAI.

After the effective date of this closure 

the maximum retainable amounts at 

§§ 679.20(e) and (f) apply at any time 

during a trip.

Classification

This action responds to the best 

available information recently obtained 

from the fishery. The Assistant 

Administrator for Fisheries, NOAA 

(AA), finds good cause to waive the 

requirement to provide prior notice and 

opportunity for public comment 

pursuant to the authority set forth at 5 

U.S.C. 553(b)(B) as such requirement is 

impracticable and contrary to the public 

interest. This requirement is 

impracticable and contrary to the public 

interest as it would prevent NMFS from 

responding to the most recent fisheries 

data in a timely fashion and would 

delay the closure of directed fishing for 

yellowfin sole by vessels using trawl 

gear in the BSAI. NMFS was unable to 

publish a notice providing time for 

public comment because the most 

recent, relevant data only became 

available as of August 17, 2005.

The AA also finds good cause to 

waive the 30-day delay in the effective 

date of this action under 5 U.S.C. 

553(d)(3). This finding is based upon 

the reasons provided above for waiver of 

prior notice and opportunity for public 

comment.

This action is required by § 679.21 

and is exempt from review under 

Executive Order 12866.

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

Dated: August 17, 2005.

Alan D. Risenhoover,

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 05–16706 Filed 8–18–05; 2:30 pm]

BILLING CODE 3510–22–S

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration

50 CFR Part 679

[Docket No. 041126332–5039–02; I.D. 

081605D]

Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic 

Zone Off Alaska; Atka Mackerel Lottery 

in Areas 542 and 543

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce.

ACTION: Temporary rule; notification of 

fishery assignments.

SUMMARY: NMFS is notifying the owners 

and operators of registered vessels of 

their assignments for the B season Atka 

mackerel fishery in harvest limit area 

(HLA) 542 and/or 543 of the Aleutian 

Islands subarea of the Bering Sea and 

Aleutian Islands management area 

(BSAI). This action is necessary to allow 

the harvest of the B season Atka 

mackerel HLA limits established for 

area 542 and area 543.

DATES: Effective 1200 hrs, Alaska local 

time (A.l.t.), August 18, 2005, until 2400 

hrs, A.l.t., December 31, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Josh 

Keaton, 907–586–7228.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS 

manages the groundfish fishery in the 

BSAI exclusive economic zone 

according to the Fishery Management 

Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea 

and Aleutian Islands Management Area 

(FMP) prepared by the North Pacific 

Fishery Management Council under 

authority of the Magnuson-Stevens 

Fishery Conservation and Management 

Act. Regulations governing fishing by 

U.S. vessels in accordance with the FMP 

appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600 

and 50 CFR part 679.

In accordance with 

§ 679.20(a)(8)(iii)(A), owners and 

operators of vessels using trawl gear for 

directed fishing for Atka mackerel in the 

HLA are required to register with 

NMFS. Ten vessels have registered with 

NMFS to fish in the B season HLA 

fisheries in areas 542 and/or 543. In 

order to reduce the amount of daily 

catch in the HLA by about half and to 

disperse the fishery over time and in 

accordance with § 679.20(a)(8)(iii)(B), 

the Administrator, Alaska Region, 

NMFS, has randomly assigned each 

vessel to the HLA directed fishery for 

Atka mackerel for which they have 

registered and is now notifying each 

vessel of its assignment.

Vessels authorized to participate in 

the first HLA directed fishery in area 

542 and/or in the second HLA directed 

fishery in area 543 in accordance with 

§ 679.20(a)(8)(iii) are as follows: Federal 

Fishery Permit number (FFP) 3835 

Seafisher, FFP 3400 Alaska Ranger, FFP 

1879 American No. 1, FFP 4093 Alaska 

Victory, and FFP 3819 Alaska Spirit.

Vessels authorized to participate in 

the first HLA directed fishery in area 

543 and/or the second HLA directed 

fishery in area 542 in accordance with 

§ 679.20(a)(8)(iii) are as follows: FFP 

2134 Ocean Peace, FFP 2443 Alaska