Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Notices 49007

(KPCS). Under Section 3(2) of the Act, 

‘‘controlled through the Kimberley 

Process Certification Scheme’’ means an 

importation from the territory of a 

Participant or exportation to the 

territory of a Participant of rough 

diamonds that is either (i) carried out in 

accordance with the KPCS, as set forth 

in regulations promulgated by the 

President, or (ii) controlled under a 

system determined by the President to 

meet substantially the standards, 

practices, and procedures of the KPCS. 

The referenced regulations are 

contained at 31 CFR Part 592 (‘‘Rough 

Diamonds Control Regulations’’) (69 FR 

56936, September 23, 2004). 

Section 6(b) of the Act requires the 

President to publish in the Federal 

Register a list of all Participants, and all 

Importing and Exporting Authorities of 

Participants, and to update the list as 

necessary. Section 2 of Executive Order 

13312 of July 29, 2003 delegates this 

function to the Secretary of State. 

Section 3(7) of the Act defines 

‘‘Participant’’ as a state, customs 

territory, or regional economic 

integration organization identified by 

the Secretary of State. Section 3(3) of the 

Act defines ‘‘Exporting Authority’’ as 

one or more entities designated by a 

Participant from whose territory a 

shipment of rough diamonds is being 

exported as having the authority to 

validate a Kimberley Process Certificate. 

Section 3(4) of the Act defines 

‘‘Importing Authority’’ as one or more 

entities designated by a Participant into 

whose territory a shipment of rough 

diamonds is imported as having the 

authority to enforce the laws and 

regulations of the Participant regarding 

imports, including the verification of 

the Kimberley Process Certificate 

accompanying the shipment. 

List of Participants 

Pursuant to Section 3 of the Clean 

Diamond Trade Act (the Act), Section 2 

of Executive Order 13312 of July 29, 

2003, and Delegation of Authority No. 

245 (April 23, 2001), I hereby identify 

the following entities as of August 15, 

2005, as Participants under section 6(b) 

of the Act. Included in this List are the 

Importing and Exporting Authorities for 

Participants, as required by Section 6(b) 

of the Act. This list revises the 

previously published list of July 29, 

2004 (69 FR 47977–47978, August 6, 

2004).

Angola—Ministry of Geology and 

Mines. 

Armenia—Ministry of Trade and 

Economic Development. 

Australia—Exporting Authority—

Department of Industry, Tourism 

and Resources; Importing 

Authority—Australian Customs 

Service.

Belarus—Department of Finance. 

Botswana—Ministry of Minerals, Energy 

and Water Resources. 

Brazil—Ministry of Mines and Energy. 

Bulgaria—Ministry of Finance. 

Canada—Natural Resources Canada. 

Central African Republic—Ministry of 

Energy and Mining. 

China—General Administration of 

Quality Supervision, Inspection and 

Quarantine. 

Democratic Republic of the Congo—

Ministry of Mines and 

Hydrocarbons. 

Croatia—Ministry of Economy. 

European Community—DG/External 

Relations/A.2. 

Ghana—Precious Minerals and 

Marketing Company Ltd. 

Guinea—Ministry of Mines and 

Geology. 

Guyana—Geology and Mines 

Commission. 

India—The Gem and Jewellery Export 

Promotion Council. 

Indonesia—Directorate General of 

Foreign Trade of the Ministry of 

Trade. 

Israel—The Diamond Controller. 

Ivory Coast—Ministry of Mines and 

Energy. 

Japan—Ministry of Economy, Trade and 

Industry. 

Republic of Korea—Ministry of 

Commerce, Industry and Energy. 

Laos—Ministry of Finance. 

Lesotho—Commissioner of Mines and 

Geology. 

Malaysia—Ministry of International 

Trade and Industry. 

Mauritius—Ministry of Commerce. 

Namibia—Ministry of Mines and 

Energy. 

Norway—The Norwegian Goldsmiths’

Association. 

Romania—National Authority for 

Consumer Protection. 

Russia—Gokhran, Ministry of Finance. 

Sierra Leone—Government Gold and 

Diamond Office. 

Singapore—Singapore Customs. 

South Africa—South African Diamond 

Board. 

Sri Lanka—National Gem and Jewellery 

Authority. 

Switzerland—State Secretariat for 

Economic Affairs. 

Taiwan—Bureau of Foreign Trade. 

Tanzania—Commissioner for Minerals. 

Thailand—Ministry of Commerce. 

Togo—Ministry of Mines and Geology. 

Ukraine—State Gemological Centre of 

Ukraine. 

United Arab Emirates—Dubai Metals 

and Commodities Center. 

United States of America—Importing 

Authority—United States Bureau of 

Customs and Border Protection; 

Exporting Authority—Bureau of the 

Census. 

Venezuela—Ministry of Energy and 

Mines. 

Vietnam—Ministry of Trade. 

Zimbabwe—Ministry of Mines and 

Mining Development.

This notice shall be published in the 

Federal Register.

Robert B. Zoelick, 

Deputy Secretary of State, Department of 

State.

[FR Doc. 05–16602 Filed 8–19–05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–07–U

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket No. OST–2005–22114] 

RIN 2105–AD53 

Time Zone Boundaries in the State of 

Indiana

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Correction notice.

SUMMARY: This notice corrects the 

docket number identified in the August 

17, 2005 publication of a notice to 

initiate proceedings to hold hearings in 

the appropriate locations in Indiana on 

the issue of the location of the boundary 

between the Eastern and Central Time 

Zones in Indiana.

DATE: Effective Date: August 22, 2005.

ADDRESSES: You may submit petitions 

[identified by the docket number in the 

heading at the beginning of this 

document] by any of the following 

methods: 

• Web site: http://dms.dot.gov. 

Follow the instructions for submitting 

petitions on the DOT electronic docket 

site. 

• Fax: 1–202–493–2251. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility; 

U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 

Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, 

Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–

001. 

• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on 

the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 

400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, 

DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal 

Holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joanne Petrie, Office of the General 

Counsel (C–50), 400 Seventh Street, 

SW., Washington, DC 20590; e-mail 

indianatime@dot.gov.; (202) 366–9306.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice 

published on August 17, 2005 (70 FR 

49008 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 161 / Monday, August 22, 2005 / Notices 

48460) incorrectly identified the docket 

number for submitting petitions as 

22119. The correct docket number for 

submitting petitions is 22114. Any 

petitions submitted to the incorrect 

docket number will appear under the 

correct docket number. This correction 

notice is to rectify that typographical 

mistake.

Issued in Washington, DC, this 18th day of 

August, 2005, 

Robert Ashby, 

Deputy Assistant General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 05–16703 Filed 8–18–05; 1:27 pm] 

BILLING CODE 4910–62–P

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration 

[Summary Notice No. PE–2005–47] 

Petitions for Exemption; Dispositions 

of Petitions Issued

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of disposition of prior 

petition. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to FAA’s rulemaking 

provisions governing the application, 

processing, and disposition of petitions 

for exemption, part 11 of title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), this 

notice contains the disposition of 

certain petitions previously received. 

The purpose of this notice is to improve 

the public’s awareness of, and 

participation in, this aspect of FAA’s 

regulatory activities. Neither publication 

of this notice nor the inclusion or 

omission of information in the summary 

is intended to affect the legal status of 

any petition or its final disposition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim 

Adams (202) 267–8033, Sandy 

Buchanan-Sumter (202) 267–7271, or 

John Linsenmeyer (202) 267–5174, 

Office of Rulemaking (ARM–1), Federal 

Aviation Administration, 800 

Independence Avenue, SW., 

Washington, DC 20591. 

This notice is published pursuant to 

14 CFR 11.85 and 11.91.

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 15, 

2005. 

Anthony F. Fazio, 

Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Disposition of Petitions 

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21696. 

Petitioner: Custom Air Transport. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.434(c)(1)(iii). 

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Custom Air 

Transport to substitute a qualified and 

authorized check airman in place of an 

FAA inspector to observe a qualifying 

pilot in command while that PIC is 

performing prescribed duties during at 

least one flight leg that includes a 

takeoff and a landing when completing 

initial or upgrade training as specified 

in § 121.434. 

Grant, 07/08/2005, Exemption No. 

8580.

Docket No.: FAA–2002–10072. 

Petitioner: Bay Air Charter. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Bay Air Charter 

to operate aircraft under part 135 

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S) 

transponder installed in those aircraft. 

Grant, 07/11/2005, Exemption No. 

7592B.

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21742. 

Petitioner: Business Aviation 

Services. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Business 

Aviation Services to operate certain 

aircraft under part 135 without a TSO–

C112 (Mode S) transponder installed in 

the aircraft. 

Grant, 07/11/2005, Exemption No. 

8581.

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21743. 

Petitioner: Gilbert Aviation. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Gilbert Aviation 

to operate certain aircraft under part 135 

without a TSO–C112 (Mode S) 

transponder installed in the aircraft. 

Grant, 07/11/2005, Exemption No. 

8583.

Docket No.: FAA–2003–21728. 

Petitioner: Action Air Express. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Action Air 

Express to operate certain aircraft under 

part 135 without a TSO–C112 (Mode S) 

transponder installed in the aircraft. 

Grant, 07/11/2005, Exemption No. 

8582.

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21652. 

Petitioner: Jim Air, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.152. 

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Jim Air, Inc. to 

operate one Construcciones Aeronautics 

Casa 212–200 model airplane under part 

135 without being equipped with an 

approved digital flight data recorder as 

required by § 135.152. 

Grant, 07/13/2005, Exemption No. 

8584.

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21734. 

Petitioner: Shuttle America 

Corporation. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.434(c). 

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Shuttle America 

Corporation and its pilots to count 

certain part 121 operation experience 

acquired or accomplished for pilots on 

the EMB–170 while those pilots were 

employed by Chatauqua Airlines, Inc., 

as if that operating experience were 

accomplished at Shuttle America 

Corporation. 

Grant, 07/15/2005, Exemption No. 

8586.

Docket No.: FAA–2002–13163. 

Petitioner: Ryan International 

Airlines, Inc. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

121.434(c)(1)(iii). 

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Ryan 

International Airlines, Inc. to substitute 

a qualified and authorized check airman 

or aircrew program designee for an FAA 

inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in 

command who is completing initial or 

upgrade training specified in § 121.424 

during at least one flight leg that 

includes a takeoff and a landing. 

Grant, 07/15/2005, Exemption No. 

8085A.

Docket No.: FAA–2005–21741. 

Petitioner: Mavrik Aire. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

135.143(c)(2). 

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit Mavrik Aire to 

operate certain aircraft under part 135 

without a TSO-C112 (Mode S) 

transponder installed in the aircraft. 

Grant, 07/20/2005, Exemption No. 

8588.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–10918. 

Petitioner: Goodyear Aviation Tires. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

21.325(b)(3). 

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit representatives 

of the Federal Aviation Administrator to 

issue export airworthiness approvals for 

Class II and Class III products at the 

Goodyear tire facility in Thailand. 

Grant, 07/21/2005, Exemption No. 

6682G.

Docket No.: FAA–2001–10356. 

Petitioner: United States Army 

Special Operations Command. 

Sections of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 

91.177(a)(2) and 91.179(b)(1). 

Description of Relief Sought/

Disposition: To permit United States 

Army Special Operations Commanding