alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 136 (Monday, July 18, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 42633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15213]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents 
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed 
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published 
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. 

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 136 / Monday, July 18, 2022 / Rules 
and Regulations

[[Page 42633]]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0155; Airspace Docket No. 20-ASO-4]
RIN 2120-AA66

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Wiggins, MS

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action corrects a final rule published in the Federal 
Register of May 23, 2022, that modifies Establishment of Class E 
airspace at Dean Griffin Memorial Airport, Wiggins, MS. The geographic 
coordinates of the airport are amended to be in concert with the FAA's 
aeronautical database.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September 8, 2022. The Director of the 
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 
1 CFR 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and 
publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Shelby, Federal Aviation 
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101 
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5857.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    The FAA published a final rule in the Federal Register for Docket 
No. FAA-2020-0155 (87 FR 31132, May 23, 2022), establishing Class E 
airspace at the Dean Griffin Memorial Airport, Wiggins, MS. Subsequent 
to publication, the FAA identified an error that the geographic 
coordinates of the airport need to be amended to be in concert with the 
FAA's aeronautical database. This correction changes the coordinates 
from ``(Lat. 30[deg]54'35'' N)'' to read ``(Lat. 30[deg]50'35'' N)''.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, in the 
Federal Register of May 23, 2022 (87 FR 31132) FR Doc. 2022-10940, 
Establishment of Class E Airspace; Wiggins, MS, is corrected as 
follows:

Sec.  71.1  [Corrected]

0
On page 31132, column 3, line 57; remove ``(Lat. 30[deg]54'35'' N)'' 
and add in its place ``(Lat. 30[deg]50'35'' N)''.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 12, 2022.
Martin A. Skinner,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022-15213 Filed 7-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
STATE v. LEUPOLD.

COA05-1434.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from Yadkin (03CRS2033, 03CRS2034, 03CRS2035, 03CRS2036, 03CRS2037, 03CRS2038, 03CRS2039)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.2








TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.





OFFICERS CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





The undersigned J. Kernan Crotty appointed and incumbent officer of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the Corporation), in connection with the
Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter ended August 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), does hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that to the best of his knowledge:





1.    The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Corporation.





January 14, 2003





/s/ J. Kernan Crotty


---

J. Kernan Crotty


President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
INCLUDED IN THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                         147,404
<SECURITIES>                                   657,359
<RECEIVABLES>                                  829,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                    63,000
<INVENTORY>                                    476,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,149,205
<PP&E>                                       2,499,724
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,194,962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,650,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          506,718
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,528
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,943,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,946,158
<SALES>                                      6,319,304
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,319,304
<CGS>                                        3,848,414
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,148,536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (43,540)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (37,010)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,201,896)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   136,173
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,338,069)
<DISCONTINUED>                              (2,338,069)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,338,069)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.08)


</TABLE>
104 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

UTAH

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

31,471

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

Military

Davis 19,214 4,527 13,653

Salt Lake 7,486 319 1,357

Tooele 1,381 39 1,238

Utah 1,193 33 42

Weber 1,046 55 197

Washington 323 ND 18

Cache 191 ND ND

Box Elder 108 10 67

Sanpete 108 ND ND

Iron 85 ND ND

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 31%

Active Duty: 16%

Civilian: 53%

34%

2%

61%

3%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

By Type

Service: 48%

Construction: 18%

Research and 

Development: 9%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 25%

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions)

L-3 Communications $244.6 M

AECOM $225.7 M

Northrop Grumman $218.3 M

Orbital ATK $103.9 M

Boeing $48.1 M

Utah State University $37.9 M

Unisys $27.8 M

Sinclair Companies $23.3 M

Toyakoi Ventures $22.4 M

C. Martin Company $22.1 M

$2.1 $2.1

$2.5 $2.4

$1.7 $1.8

$1.6

$2.7 35%

10%

43%

12%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 105

Box Elder

Tooele 

Iron

Cache

Weber

Davis

Utah

Salt Lake

Box Elder

Sanpete

Tooele 

Iron

Washington 

Cache

Weber

Davis

Davis County

$1.1 B

Salt Lake County

$156.6 M

Tooele County 

$83.8 M

Weber County

$20.4 M

Utah County

$15.2 M

Box Elder County

$5.1 M

Washington County

$3.0 M

Cache County

$2.4 M

Sanpete County

$0.9 M

Iron County

$0.7 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Salt Lake County

$626.4 M

Davis County

$457.9 M

Tooele County

$303.9 M

Weber County

$61.0 M

Utah County

$56.1 M

Box Elder County

$56.0 M

Cache County

$40.7 M

Summit County

$19.9 M

Iron County

$8.2 M

Morgan County

$3.8 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

#31

$3.0 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#22

1.9% OF STATE GDP

0.8%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$995

PER RESIDENT

#33

$1.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#28

31,471 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#24

$1.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 UTAH

(M=millions B=billions)

Morgan

Summit 

Utah

Salt Lake

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active
STATE of North Carolina v. Phillip Eugene ANDERSON.

No. 80P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Marilyn Ozer, Chapel Hill, for Phillip Eugene Anderson.

Steyen Bryant, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 17th day of February 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th day of February 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-89,790-01 & WR-89,790-02

EX P ARTE LUKE HAMP TON, App licant

ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. 14-00033A-86-F & 14-00034A- 86-F IN THE 86 DISTRICT COURT FROMKA UF MAN C OUNTY

T H

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for wr i t s o f h ab ea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child. He was and sentenced to fifty y ear s’ and ten y ear s’ imprisonment respe ctively

. The Fifth Court of Appea ls modified and aff irmed his convictions. Hampton v. State , Nos. 05-15-00509- CR & 05-15-00510- CR (Tex. App.—Dallas J une 13, 2016)(not designated f or publication). A pplicant contends that his appellate counsel rende red ineffe ctive a s s is ta n c e b e c a u s e c o u n s e l failed to timely notify

Applicant that his conviction had be en af firmed a nd failed to a dvise him of2

his rig ht to petition pro se for discretionar y revie w. We rema

nded these applications to the trial court for f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law

. Appellate counsel filed an aff idavit with the trial court and mail logs wer e obtained from the prison wher e Applicant was housed. Ba sed on those rec ords, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fac t and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applican t t h at his conviction had been aff

irmed and failed to advise him of his rig ht to petition for discretionar y revie w pro se . The trial court recommends that relief be g rante d. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is e ntitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time petitions for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nts of the Fifth Court of Appea ls in Cause Nos. 05-15-00509- CR & 05-15-00510- CR that aff irmed his convictions in Cause Nos. 14-00033-86- F & 14-00034-86- F from the 86 District Court of Kauf man County

. Applicant shall file his petitions for discretionar y t h revie w with this Court wit hin 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 23, 2019 Do not publish
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7828

JEAN-CLAUDE RINEHART, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusJOEL H. BREWER, Person County District Attorney; PERSON COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; GAIL SHULL, Detective, Person County Sheriff’s Department, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-97-713-1) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 10, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jean-Claude Rinehart, Appellant Pro Se. Mark John Pletzke, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Keith David Burns, FAISON & GILLESPIE, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Jean-Claude Rinehart appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinionaccepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Rinehart v. Brewer , No. CA-97-713-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John J. Dee, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Paragon
Real Estate Equity and Investment Trust, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Paragon Real Estate
Equity and Investment Trust (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of trustees
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 8, 2004. By:
    
    /s/ John J. DeeJohn J. DeeChief Financial Officer andSenior Vice President(Principal Financial Officer)
 1
STATE v. POKE.

No. COA05-1003.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 1, 2006.

Certification Date August 21, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (04CRS24266, 04CRS35283).

Case without published opinion. No error.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL OP-OFA-025]

*Responsible Agency:*                     Office of Federal Activities, General Information 202-564-5632 or                     *https://www.epa.gov/​nepa.*

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) 

Filed July 1, 2022 10 a.m. EST Through July 11, 2022 10 a.m. 

EST Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

*Notice:*                     Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment letters on EISs are available at:                     *https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/​cdx-enepa-public/​action/​eis/​search.*

                    EIS No. 20220096, Final, VA, PRO, Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for the Veterans Affairs Housing Loan Program,                     *Review Period Ends:*                     08/15/2022,                     *Contact:*                     Erin Byrum 615-279-7446.                

                    EIS No. 20220097, Draft, BOEM, Other, 2023-2028 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program,                     *Comment Period Ends:*                     10/06/2022,                     *Contact:*                     Jill Lewandowski 703-787-1703.                

                    EIS No. 20220098, Final, USFS, NM, Cibola National Forest Land Management Plan Final Environmental Impact Statement,                     *Review Period Ends:*                     08/15/2022,                     *Contact:*                     James Turner 505-346-3814.                

                    EIS No. 20220099, Draft Supplement, BLM, AK, Willow Master Development Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement,                     *Comment Period Ends:*                     08/29/2022,                     *Contact:*                     Stephanie Rice 907-271-3202.                

Dated: July 11, 2022

Robert Tomiak,

Director, Office of Federal Activities.

[FR Doc. 2022-15155 Filed 7-14-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
STATE v. CHAMPION.

No. COA05-1660.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Harnett (04CRS51117)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jack L. Alexander,  Senior Vice President of MidAmerican  Energy Company (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the  quarterly
     period  ended  March  31,  2003  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


Dated:   May 12, 2003




                              /s/ Jack L. Alexander
                              ----------------------------
                              Jack L. Alexander
                              Senior Vice President
                              (co-chief executive officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to  MidAmerican  Energy  Company  and will be  retained by  MidAmerican
Energy Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.