alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeEducationCurrents

# Surface Ocean Currents

## Currents Tutorial

**Click the image**

----

In  the Northern Hemisphere, warm air around the equator rises and flows  north toward the pole. As the air moves away from the equator, the  Coriolis effect deflects it toward the right. It cools and descends  near 30 degrees North latitude. The descending air blows from the  northeast to the southwest, back toward the equator (Ross, 1995). A  similar wind pattern occurs in the Southern Hemisphere; these winds  blow from the southeast toward the northwest and descend near 30  degrees South latitude.

These prevailing winds, known as the trade winds, meet at the  Intertropical Convergence Zone (also called the doldrums) between 5  degrees North and 5 degrees South latitude, where the winds are calm.  The remaining air (air that does not descend at 30 degrees North or  South latitude) continues toward the poles and is known as the westerly  winds, or westerlies. The trade winds are so named because ships have  historically taken advantage of them to aid their journies between  Europe and the Americas (Bowditch, 1995).

### Currents Lessons

              - Welcome
              - Tidal Currents 1
              - Tidal Currents 2
              Coastal Currents
              - Waves
              - Longshore Currents
              - Rip Currents
              - Upwelling
              Surface Ocean Currents
              - The Coriolis Effect
              - Surface Ocean Currents
              - Boundary Currents
              - The Ekman Spiral
              The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Thermohaline Circulation
              - The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Effects of Climate Change
              How Are Currents Measured?
              - Age of Exploration
              - What is a "knot"?
              - Shallow Water Drifter
              - Deep Ocean Drifter
              - Current Profiler
              - Shore-based Current Meters
              - How Currents Affect Our Lives?
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources
              - Subject Review

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
STATE v. BRUNTON.

No. COA06-67.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Lenoir (05CRS50219, 05CRS51592).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
REYES v. RAY

No. COA04-1129

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed August 16, 2005

Certification Date September 6, 2005

Appeal from Robeson (02CVS1235).

Cases reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
STATE v. CARSON.

No. COA05-1598.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS2020639, 04CRS202641, 04CRS202643).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5477 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5477

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 120 South Del Mar Avenue in San Gabriel, California, as the ``Chi 
                      Mui Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHI MUI POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 120 South Del Mar Avenue in San Gabriel, California, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Chi Mui Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Chi Mui 
Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5477

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 120 South Del Mar Avenue in San Gabriel, California, as the ``Chi 
                      Mui Post Office Building''.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of B&G Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending July 3, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David L. Wenner, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and I, Robert C. Cantwell, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ David L. Wenner     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David L. Wenner         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| July 27, 2010      |   |
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Robert C. Cantwell  |   |
| Robert C. Cantwell      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| July 27, 2010      |   |

 

 

*A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
STATE v. MITCHELL.

No. COA05-1631.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (03CRS107615)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 19, 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 00049

- CR

Allen Maroyd Deloach, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF LAMPASAS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rend ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record a nd the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of c osts is made.
**Exhibit 10.41**

**INTELLISYNC CORPORATION**

**Summaryof Executive Officer Bonus Plan**

                OnAugust 24, 2005, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of IntellisyncCorporation (the “Company”) approved a change to the criteria for achievementof executive officer bonuses.  Executiveofficer bonuses for fiscal year 2006 will be paid based upon achievement ofgross revenue and operating profit metrics as determined by the compensationcommittee of the Board.  The percentageallocation will be determined annually by the compensation committee.  For fiscal year 2006, the potential bonusallocations for the Company’s executive officers range from 83% to 20% of suchexecutive officer’s base compensation and are to be paid out based uponachievement of gross revenue and operating profit metrics established by thecompensation committee.
#### John Murnyack, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Matthew Murnyack, an Infant, Appellant, v Bart Rebon et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[801 NYS2d 658]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered June 1, 2004 in a personal injury action. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the motions of defendants Bart Rebon, Lewiston-Porter High School, Lewiston-Porter Central School District and Board of Education of the Lewiston-Porter Central School District for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and cross claims against them.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by denying the motion of defendant Bart Rebon in part and reinstating the complaint and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action, individually and as parent and natural guardian of his son, seeking damages for injuries sustained by his son when he was struck by another student after exiting a school bus. Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendants Lewiston-Porter High School and Lewiston-Porter Central School District and its Board of Education (school defendants) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint “together with any” cross claims against them. It is well established that “[s]chools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision. Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students” *(Mirand v City of New York,*84 NY2d 44, 49 [1994] [internal citations omitted]). Here, the school defendants established that they did not have “sufficiently specific knowledge or notice of the dangerous conduct” that caused the injury *(id.).*They established that defendant Bart Rebon had never engaged in prior similar conduct with plaintiffs son or any *1407other student *(cf. DeMunda v Niagara Wheatfield Bd. of Educ.,*213 AD2d 975, 976 [1995]; *see generally Mirand,*84 NY2d at 49-50) and thus that “the third-party acts could [not] reasonably have been anticipated” *(Mirand,*84 NY2d at 49), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact to defeat the motion *(see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).

We further conclude, however, that the court erred in granting that part of the motion of Rebon for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against him, and we therefore modify the order accordingly. There are issues of fact concerning the events preceding the altercation and the manner in which the altercation occurred *(see generally id.).*Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,663
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                       292
<INVENTORY>                                      3,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,354
<PP&E>                                          26,948
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,219
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  95,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,465
<BONDS>                                         76,681
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,589
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    95,325
<SALES>                                          9,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,575
<CGS>                                            1,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,846
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (156)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2,401)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (3,568)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,969)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,170                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,435                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (562)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,664                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,788                       0
<PP&E>                                          14,127                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,187                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,338                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,109                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        20,051                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (622)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,338                       0
<SALES>                                         19,277                  17,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,277                  17,287
<CGS>                                           12,621                  10,814
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,657                  14,647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (31)                      87
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,651                   2,553
<INCOME-TAX>                                       729                   1,017
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,922                   1,536
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,922                   1,536
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.29                    0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.27                    0.23
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10


JOINDER AGREEMENT




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLCBy:
    /s/ Janice FetschName:
    Janice FetschTitle:
    Authorized SignatoryCITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.By:
    /s/ Laurie A. HessleinName:
    Laurie A. HessleinTitle:
    Managing DirectorCITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLCBy:
    /s/ Jerry PascucciName:
    Jerry PascucciTitle:
    PresidentEACH OF THE FUNDS LISTED ON EXHIBIT A HERETOBy:
    Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, the generalpartner or trading manager of each FundBy:
    /s/ Jerry PascucciName:
    Jerry PascucciTitle:
    President
SHELL v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BANKING COM'N.

No. COA05-306.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (04CVS4683)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-7958-5] 

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed de minimis settlement. 

# SUMMARY:

                        Under section 122(g)(4) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the Environmental Protection Agency has offered a de minimis settlement at the Florida Petroleum Reprocessors Superfund Site (Site) located in Davie, Florida. EPA will consider public comments until September 23, 2005. EPA may withdraw from or modify the proposed settlement should such comments disclose facts or considerations which indicated the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. Copies of the proposed settlement are available from: Ms. Paula V. Batchelor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303, (404) 562-8887, E-mail:                         *Batchelor.Paula@EPA.gov.*

Written or e-mail comments may be submitted to Paula V. Batchelor at the above address within 30 days of the date of publication. 

Dated: August 10, 2005. 

Rosalind H. Brown, 

Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Waste Management Division. 

[FR Doc. 05-16812 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6550-60-P
# L_2019152EN.01012801.xml

| 11.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 152/128 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 152/128

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 2013/59/Euratom of 5 December 2013 laying down basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation, and repealing Directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom and 2003/122/Euratom

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 13 of 17 January 2014
  )

On page 41, title of Annex III:

for:

‘Activity values defining high-activity sealed sources as referred to in point (43) of Article 4’,

read:

‘Activity values defining high-activity sealed sources as referred to in point (41) of Article 4’.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SEC.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CUNO, Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frederick C. Flynn,
Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ FREDERICK C. FLYNN, JR
--------------------------------------
Frederick C. Flynn, Jr.
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: December 13, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF VISION TWENTY-ONE, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        JURISDICTION
SUBSIDIARY                                              OF INCORPORATION
----------                                              ----------------
<S>                                                         <C>
Vision 21 Managed Eye Care of Tampa, Bay, Inc.              Florida
Vision 21 Management Services, Inc.                         Florida
Vision 21 of Southern Arizona, Inc.                         Florida
Vision 21 of Sierra Vista, Inc.                             Florida
Vision Twenty-One Managed Eye Care, IPA, Inc.               New York
LSI Acquisition, Inc.                                       New Jersey
MEC Health Care, Inc.                                       Maryland
Vision Twenty-One Physician
     Practice Management Company                            Florida
          Vision Twenty-One Eye Laser Centers, Inc.         Florida
BBG-COA, Inc.                                               Delaware
     BVC Administrators, Inc.                               New Jersey
     Block Vision, Inc.                                     New Jersey
          UVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.        New York
          CHVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.       New York
          MVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.        New York
          WVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.        New York
          FVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.        New York
          BHVC Independent Practice Association, Inc.       New York
          The Block Group of New York, Inc.                 New York
          BBG Independent Practice Association, Inc.        New York
          VCA Independent Practice Association, Inc.        New York
          Block Vision of Texas, Inc.                       Texas

</TABLE>