alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT (31.1)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a/15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vought Aircraft Industries,
Inc. (registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    (omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238);(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit
committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Tom RisleyTom RisleyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
FULLER v. CLEAR CHANNEL COMMUNICATIONS.

COA06-268.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 7, 2006.

Certification Date November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #286748).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. RIVERS.

No. COA06-90.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from New Hanover (04CRS69310)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 162 (Tuesday, August 23, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49255]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16686]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security


Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory 
Committee; Notice of Open Meeting

    The Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory 
Committee will meet on September 7, 2005, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. 
Hoover Building, Room 6087B, 14th Street between Pennsylvania and 
Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the 
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with 
respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls 
applicable to transportation and related equipment or technology.
    Agenda:
    1. Opening remarks and introductions.
    2. Review of Bureau issues of significance to TRANSTAC members.
    3. Regulatory Overview.
    4. Policy issues.
    5 Wassenaar proposal status.
    6. Jurisdiction working group report.
    7. Follow-up on open action items.
    8. Focus on proposals for March 6 Wassenaar presentation.
    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of 
seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent 
time permits, member of the public may present oral statements to the 
Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or 
after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public 
presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests 
that you forward your public presentation materials to Yvette Springer 
at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2178525153484f464453614348520f454e420f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="124b6162607b7c75776052707b613c767d713c757d64">[email protected]</span></a>.
    For more information, call Ms. Springer on (202) 482-4814.

    Dated: August 17, 2005.
Yvette Springer,
Committee Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 05-16686 Filed 8-22-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE EX REL. MEZA v. MEZA.

No. COA05-1502.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 15, 2006.

Certification Date September 5, 2006.

Appeal from Randolph (05CVD731).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.§1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VII, L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





Date:      March 22, 2011





/s/ Paritosh K. ChoksiParitosh K. ChoksiExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer ofATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Apollo Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”), I, Howard Widra, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory W. Hunt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ HOWARD WIDRAHoward WidraChief Executive OfficerFebruary 3, 2022


/s/ GREGORY W. HUNTGregory W. HuntChief Financial Officer and TreasurerFebruary 3, 2022
STATE of North Carolina v. Donald Wayne McGEE.

No. 77P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Donald Wayne McGee.

Richard E. Slipsky, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 15th day of February 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

 

I, Richard L. Peteka, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Apollo Investment Corporation, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofApollo Investment Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisquarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flow of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared; and 

 

b) evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over the financial reporting; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Dated this day ofFebruary 7, 2006
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Steven M. Van Dick, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hansen Medical, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   May 14, 2007     /s/ Steven M. Van Dick   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
IB 

Union Calendar No. 532 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5743 

[Report No. 110–828] 

To provide the Secretary of Homeland Security with the authority to procure 

real property and accept in-kind donations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2008 

Mr. BROUN of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2008 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To provide the Secretary of Homeland Security with the 

authority to procure real property and accept in-kind 

donations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Scientific Trans5 formations through Advancing Research (STAR) Act’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5743 RH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY OF SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECU2 RITY TO PROCURE REAL PROPERTY AND AC3 CEPT IN-KIND DONATIONS. 

4 The Secretary of Homeland Security may accept and 

5 use donations of real property, personal property, labora6 tory and office space, utility services, and infrastructure 

7 upgrades for the purpose of carrying out basic, applied, 

8 and advanced research, development, testing, evaluation, 

9 and related activities. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 532 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5743 

[Report No. 110

–828] 

A BILL 

To provide the Secretary of Homeland Security 

accept in-kind donations. with the authority to procure real property and 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2008 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
STATE v. WALDEN

No. COA05-98.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Gaston (03CRS20299, 03CRS64947).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable C. 0. Uurd~och 

County Attorney 

menartl County 

mwlara, Texae 

Dear Sir: 

r a8 follower 

J Judge pmoerd with offiotal 

wearing n4w off~oerr, and apbonds, after he haa taken 

e and after he has execute& hi8 

boga but before he ham ba hi8 bona 8pprored 

by the Commierioaer8 Court? 

*This queetioa has been rai84d by the out 

gOhg bOUnty dUdgA, And it if3 my OpiniAn that 

th4 provlaion in respect to hating tbe bond of 
Honorable C. 0. Hurdooh, Pege 2 

the County Judge approved la dlreotory ana 

not man8atoq And that the bounty Judge ray 

begin ofilolai duties uaaor the oondltlonr 

ret forth abole, providing that ,hle bona la 

approrea on the day his tern be@aa by the 

n4 w Go lul r lo nerr Clourt . I bear 8y oplnloa 

upon the statute, largely, Artiola 1928, ClV. 

Btatutea, vol. 4, page 422, whioh reAdI a8 

f ollowa: 

a + 4 í l * 

ePlaaae glre me your opinion at your 

earliest oonren~anoe; if it %a contrary 00 

nine, there may be a rather OOiBQliOAted rltuation existing hero; and 1 may hava to requalify, for I wae sworn in by our sew oouatr 

Judge; and I Undarrtand that one of the $om- 

~laaioaere we11 aworn in oad had hla bona, approred by the new oounty Judge, and then he 

served to approve the bond of the new oounty 

Judge. n 

For the purposes of this oplalon we are not paarlng 

upon the question of vhethor or not the oiilolal bond of the 

oountf Judge muat ?m approved by the ooaaalaaionera~ oourt beiore he ia quallflaa as oounty uage but under the fsotr stated 

abave, the offioer in question (lo&y Judge) war at least an 

ofiioer de taoto. An oiiioer de facto has been broadly aeflaea 

AS one who has the reputation of bring the otfioer he aaaumea to 

be, also as one who, under color of right, entere into the poaeesalon OS an offloe and exerolaer the Suaotlona thereof, or who 

exerolaea the duties of the oifloe under the oolor of A known 

Aad valid appolntnent or electioni but frlla to oonform to some 

preoedent requirement or OondltlOn, a8 to take an oath, give a 

bond, or the like. Numerous other deflnltlona alrllar In import, 

are to be found in the books, (l;u$le t. Olenroee Xndepenuent 

School Dletrlot SO S. W. (2d) S7S* Wartln V. Grandview Independent School DiatLlot, 2W S. N. 807j, 

Insofar AS third person8 are ooaoerned, the rights 

and llabllitler of the de faoto offloer are the same ae those 

of an ofiloer de Jure. (Texas Jurlaprud.enoe, Vol. 34, p. 628, 

and authorltlcs olted therein.) 

The offlola aot6 of a de faoto ofitber are Valid 
Honorable 0. 0. krdooh, Page s 

fmf?r as the rubllo or~third persona are oono)mail, +a tholr 

t3w ralldlty may not be oollaterally queatloae~. ITexas Jurla., 

p..,‘. VOX. 34, Q. 829, And AUthOrltieS cite& therein). 

In view of the foregoing authorities nnU under the 

above l trite& faota, pour question is reapeotfully anawarad in 

the afflrmtlve. 

%uating that the foregoing fully answera your inquiry, we are 

x,w~~ 

Ax'dell Willla~ 

Aaditaat 

AW:R0 

AFFROVED3At? 14, 1941 

ATTORNEY GFXERAL OF TPXAS
BERKOW v. WEST

No. COA04-1393.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from Jackson (03CVD115).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Texas Petrochemicals LP (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the annual period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


September 30, 2002         /s/ CARL S. STUTTS
                           ----------------------------------------------------
                           Carl S. Stutts
                           Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Cite as State v. Smith , 2020-Ohio-1443.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2020-P-0020 - vs - : MICHAEL A. SMITH, : Defendant-Appellant. :

Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2016 C R 00513.

Jud g ment: Dismissed.

Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna, OH 44266 ( For Plaintiff-Appellee )

. Michael A. Smith, pro se, PID# 762-940, Trumbull Correctional Institution, 5701 Burnett Road, P.O. Box 901, Leavittsbur g , OH 44430 ( Defendant-Appellant )

.

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J. {¶1} On February 25, 2020, appellant, Michael A. Smith, pro se, file d a “Motion to file Appeal on Sentence,” construed as a motion for leave to file a delayed appeal, pursuant to App.R. 5(A). No notice of appeal was filed in the trial court, and no judgment entry for which appellant appeals was provided. {¶2} App.R. 5(A) provides:2 {¶3} “After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App. R. 4(A) for the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be take n by a defendant with leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following clas ses of cases: {¶4} “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * * {¶5} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals

and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right. Concurrently with the filing of the motion, the movant shall file with the clerk of the trial court a notice of appeal in the form prescribed by App.R. 3 and shall file a copy of the notice of the appeal in the court of appeals. * * *.” (Emphasis added.) {¶6} In the present case, appellant’s motion is defective for the fo llowing reasons: 1) appellant’s motion does not set forth any reasons for filing an untimely appeal; and 2) no notice of appeal was filed in the trial court concurrently with the filing of the motion for leave to appeal in this court. Further, no a ppealed judgment entry was provided pursuant to Loc.R. 3(D)(2). {¶7} Accordingly, because appellant’s present motion is procedurally defective, it is hereby overruled. {¶8} We note that appellant is not barred from filing a new motion f or leave to file a delayed appeal that complies with the App.R. 5(A) and th e local rules of this court by filing a notice of appeal with the trial with an attached ju dgment entry on appeal. {¶9} This matter is dismissed. MATT LYNCH, J., MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,

concur.