alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance sheet of  MidAmerican  Energy  Company as of September 30,
1995, and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the
nine months  ended  September  30,  1995,  and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,649,218
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    829,820
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         308,317
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       409,270
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 223,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,419,808
<COMMON>                                       801,324
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            434,032
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1,231,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          50,000
<PREFERRED>                                    89,955
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           1,385,281
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 135,700
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  74,159
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,453,125
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  4,419,808
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      1,224,977
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           55,285<F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     995,758
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     995,758
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        229,219
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             10,591<F2>
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 239,810
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       82,301
<NET-INCOME>                                   102,224
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    6,240
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  95,984
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       88,605
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      60,081
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         286,955
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.96
<FN>
<F1>Tag 37 includes operating and nonoperating income taxes and is excluded
from operating expenses in Tag 39 and on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
<F2>Tag 41 includes $1,945,000 of Income from Discontinued Operations, net of
income taxes.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Income Fund I (the Fund), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President of the Manager and of the Fund, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the Report of the Fund filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
 
 
 
 /s/ James A. Coyne
 James A. Coyne
 President of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 May 14, 2004
July 25, 2005

EarlyBirdCapital, Inc.
275 Madison Avenue
Suite 1203
New York, New York 10016

          Re: Paramount Acquisition Corp.

Gentlemen:

          This letter will confirm the agreement of the undersigned to purchase
warrants ("Warrants") of Paramount Acquisition Corp. ("Company") included in the
units ("Units") being sold in the Company's initial public offering ("IPO") upon
the terms and conditions set forth herein. Each Unit is comprised of one share
of Common Stock and two Warrants. The shares of Common Stock and Warrants will
not be separately tradable until 90 days after the effective date of the
Company's IPO unless EarlyBirdCapital, Inc. ("EBC") informs the Company of its
decision to allow earlier separate trading.

          The undersigned agrees that this letter agreement constitutes an
irrevocable order for EBC or an independent broker/dealer designated by EBC (in
either case, the "Broker") to purchase for the undersigned's account within the
three month period commencing on the date separate trading of the Warrants
commences ("Separation Date") up to _______ Warrants at market prices not to
exceed $0.70 per Warrant ("Maximum Warrant Purchase"). The Broker agrees to fill
such order in such amounts and at such times as it may determine, in its sole
discretion, during the three month period commencing on the Separation Date
(such period is hereinafter referred to as the "Purchase Period"). EBC further
agrees that it will not charge the undersigned any fees and/or commissions with
respect to such purchase obligation.

          This letter is one of several similar letters (the "Other Letters")
with _________, ________, _______, ________, _________ and _________
(collectively, the "Other Founders") obligating the Other Founders to similarly
purchase Warrants. The Broker agrees that at any time it purchases Warrants
under this letter or under any of the Other Letters, it will use reasonable
commercial efforts to purchase Warrants for the account of the undersigned and
the Other Founders, pro rata, on the basis of the Maximum Warrant Purchase set
forth herein and in each of the Other Letters.

          The Broker will promptly notify the undersigned of any purchase of
Warrants hereunder and under the Other Letters so that the undersigned can
comply with applicable reporting requirements on a timely basis.

          The undersigned agrees that he shall not sell or transfer the Warrants
until after the consummation of a merger, capital stock exchange, asset
acquisition or other similar business combination with an operating business and
acknowledges that, at the option of EBC, the certificates for such Warrants
shall contain a legend indicating such restriction on transferability.

                                             Very truly yours,


                                             -----------------------------------

ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

EarlyBirdCapital Inc.


By:
   ----------------------------

[Independent Broker]


By:
   ----------------------------
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Pamela M. Cyr , President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of SE Financial  Corp.
(Registrant);


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the Registrant and I
have:


a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures , or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  Registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  Registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  and  presented in this  quarterly  report my  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and


c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  Registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and


5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial  reporting  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act Rules  13a-15(f)),  to the
Registrant's   auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of  Registrant's  board  of
directors:


a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  Registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and


b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: June 14, 2006     /s/Pamela M. Cyr
                        --------------------------------------------------------
                        Pamela M. Cyr
                        President & CEO
                        (Principal Executive and Financial & Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                            32,456
<SECURITIES>                                   1,592,158
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,129,859
<ALLOWANCES>                                      96,133
<INVENTORY>                                      669,601
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,610,731
<PP&E>                                         2,702,821
<DEPRECIATION>                                   919,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,082,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            672,898
<BONDS>                                          194,318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           2,307
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,086,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,082,991
<SALES>                                        6,881,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6,881,838
<CGS>                                          3,542,941
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,542,941
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   7,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                27,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (584,871)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     110,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (694,871)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (694,871)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.33)


</TABLE>
Curtis L. SANGSTER v. The Honorable Michael BEALE, Senior Resident Judge of Anson County Superior Court.

No. 575P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 13, 2006.

Curtis L. Sangster, Pro Se.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Beale.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 7th day of November 2006 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Anson County:

*550"Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 13th day of November 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Huu The CAO.

No. 87P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Russell J. Hollers, III, Durham, for Huu The Cao.

Richard G. Sowerby, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 21st day of February 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of February 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5356 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain surge protective receptacles and 

surge suppressor strips. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain surge protective 

receptacles and surge suppressor strips. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SURGE PROTECTIVE RECEPTACLES 

4 AND SURGE SUPPRESSOR STRIPS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Industrial and hospital grade 

surge protective receptacles 

and surge suppressor strips 

(provided for in subheading 

8536.30.80) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5356 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Marsha A. EARLY, Petitioner v. COUNTY OF DURHAM DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Respondent.

No. 524PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 15, 2006.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 172 N.C.App. 344, 616 S.E.2d 553 (2005), affirming an order entered 11 July 2003 by Judge Evelyn Werth Hill in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 20 November 2006.

*540Patrice Walker, Chapel Hill, for petitioner-appellee.

S.C. Kitchen, County Attorney, by Lowell L. Siler, Deputy County Attorney, for respondent-appellant.

James B. Blackburn, III, General Counsel, for North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
#### Frank Piche et al., Appellants, v Greenpoint Savings Bank, Also Known as Greenpoint Bank, Defendant and ThirdParty Plaintiff-Respondent. Valley Storage, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 510]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and conversion, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jackson, J.), dated February 24, 2004, which, upon an order of the same court dated November 25, 2003, adhering, upon reargument and renewal, to its prior determination in an order dated April 8, 2003, granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126, dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, the order dated November 25, 2003, is vacated, the motion to dismiss the complaint is denied, the complaint is reinstated, and the order dated April 8, 2003, is modified accordingly.

The record does not support the conclusion that the plaintiffs’ failure to timely respond to some of the defendants’ demands for disclosure was willful, contumacious, or in bad faith. Thus, the” Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 based on such failure *(see Felipe v 2820 W. 36th St. Realty Corp.,*7 AD3d 483 [2004]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Fisher, JJ., concur.
James and Charlotte COKER, Robert and Rebecca Darconte, and Donald and Bonita Shoe v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION.

No. 532A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 7, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the *462Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 617 S.E.2d 306 (2005), affirming an order and opinion dismissing plaintiffs' amended complaint entered on 5 January 2004 by Judge Ben F. Tennille in Superior Court, Rowan County. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 March 2006.

Wallace & Graham, P.A., by Cathy A. Williams and Mona Lisa Wallace, Salisbury; Wyrick Robbins Yates & Ponton LLP, by K. Edward Greene, Raleigh; and Shipman & Wright, L.L.P., by Gary K. Shipman, Wilmington, for plaintiff-appellants.

Smith Moore LLP, by Sidney S. Eagles, Jr., Raleigh and Allison O. Van Laningham, Greensboro and Bush Seyferth Kethledge & Paige PLLC, by Raymond M. Kethledge, Troy, MI, for defendant-appellee.

Jonathan Wall, Counsel for the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae.

Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, by Burley B. Mitchell, Jr. and Sean E. Andrussier, Raleigh, for the National Association of Manufacturers and the American Tort Reform Association, amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26

                               November 23, 1999



Thomas A. Jermoluk
Chief Executive Officer
At Home Corporation
450 Broadway
Redwood City, CA 94063

                       Re:  Amendment of Employment Agreement
                            ---------------------------------

Dear TJ:

     This letter will clarify and amend your employment agreement dated July 19,
1996 (the "Employment Agreement") with At Home Corporation (the "Company").  As
you know, the Board of Directors has approved, and the Company is announcing, a
plan for the restructuring of the Company that would include a separation of the
media business from the platform business of the Company and the issuance of a
tracking stock for the media business.  The Board recognizes that this
restructuring can be expected to lead to a management structure in which you are
no longer the Chief Executive Officer of the Company or as a result of which you
are placed in a lower stature position than Chief Executive Officer of the
Company.  Accordingly, we agree as follows:

     1.   Should you cease to be Chief Executive Officer of the Company for any
reason, including your resignation, the Company shall be deemed to have
terminated your employment without "cause" pursuant to paragraph 5(c) or (d) of
the Employment Agreement and, as a result, all vesting restrictions with respect
to the Restricted Stock and the Series K Stock referred to in your Employment
Agreement shall lapse on the date of such termination.

     2.   At such time as you cease to be Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, if requested by the Board, you will become Chairman of the Board of the
Company or its media business subsidiary and you agree to continue to serve in
that capacity (a) up to full time as requested by your successor as Chief
Executive Officer to assist with the restructuring of the Company through July
31, 2000 and (b) thereafter in an active role as requested by the Chief
Executive Officer to assist with the post-restructuring transition through the
period ending one year after the restructuring is accomplished, or if the
restructuring is not accomplished by December 31, 2000, until December 31, 2000.

     3.   As provided under the terms of the option granted to you in December
1998 to purchase a total of one million shares of the Company's Series A Common
<PAGE>

Stock, that option  will continue to vest as long as you continue to serve as a
member of the Board of the Company or its media business subsidiary.

We agree that this letter clarifies and, to the extent set forth herein, amends
the terms of your Employment Agreement.


                                       Very truly yours,

                                       /s/ L. JOHN DOERR

                                       L. John Doerr
                                       for the Board of Directors
                                       of At Home Corporation


Agreed and Accepted:


/s/ THOMAS A. JERMOLUK
--------------------------
Thomas A. Jermoluk
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50727 

Summary Calendar

__________________

SHERMAN RENSHAW,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES PROBATION DEP'T,

 Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-94-CV-145

- - - - - - - - - -

April 5, 1996

Before REAVLEY, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sherman Renshaw argues that the district court abused its

discretion in failing to conduct an evidentiary hearing on his

claim that he is entitled to an immediate federal probation

revocation hearing. Renshaw also argues that the district court

erred in conducting a de novo review of the record after the

United States failed to file timely objections to the magistrate

judge's findings and recommendation.
No. 95-50727

-2-

We have reviewed the record, the opinion of the district

court, and the briefs, and find that the dismissal of the

petition should be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Renshaw v. United States Probation

Department, No. A-94-CV-145 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 7, 1995). The

district court did not reverse the factual findings or legal

conclusions of the magistrate judge. The district court had a

duty to fully review the record and was free to accept, reject,

or modify the recommendation of the magistrate judge. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The district court's ultimate disposition

of the case is AFFIRMED.