alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
RESTRICTED SHARE AGREEMENT
 Amendment Trust Trustee Effective
Date
 Original Agreement
 Restricted Shares
      Defined Terms
 Extension of Period of Services
 1) GRANTING OF RESTRICTED SHARES.
 1




---



##### 



Extension of Period of Restrictions on Transferability
  Extension of Vesting Period
  (i)
    
    a public offering by the Trust sufficient to liquidate
the Restricted Shares;(ii)
    
    an exchange of the Trusts existing shares for new
shares, and(iii)
    
    September 29, 2009.
 Extension of Forfeiture Period
  Terms of Original Agreement Ratified and Confirmed
 Conflict
 2




---



##### 



Binding Effect and Counterparts
 Governing Law; Amendments
  PARAGON REAL ESTATE EQUITY ANDINVESTMENT TRUST, a Maryland real estate
investment trust/s/ John J. DeeBy:   John J. DeeIts:   SecretaryTrustee
 3
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 99(iv)
                                  Certification

                      STATEMENT OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER

                            OF TICE TECHNOLOGY, INC.

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  Section 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Tice Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Sharon Draper, Chief
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

          1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

          Date: June 26, 2003

                                       By:         /s/  Sharon Draper
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      Sharon Draper,
                                                 Chief Accounting Officer
# L_2013198EN.01004701.xml

| 23.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 198/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 198/47

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2013/393/CFSP

of 22 July 2013

amending Decision 2013/382/CFSP extending the mandate of the European Union Special Representative in Afghanistan

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Articles 28, 31(2) and 33 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 March 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/168/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Vygaudas UŠACKAS as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) in Afghanistan. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 March 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/168/CFSP (1) appointing Mr Vygaudas UŠACKAS as the European Union Special Representative (EUSR) in Afghanistan.

| (2) | On 15 July 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/382/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 30 June 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 15 July 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/382/CFSP (2) extending the mandate of the EUSR until 30 June 2014.

| (3) | A new EUSR in Afghanistan should be appointed for the period from 1 September 2013 to 30 June 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

A new EUSR in Afghanistan should be appointed for the period from 1 September 2013 to 30 June 2014.

| (4) | Decision 2013/382/CFSP should be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2013/382/CFSP should be amended accordingly.

| (5) | The EUSR will implement his mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The EUSR will implement his mandate in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 1 of Decision 2013/382/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘Article 1

European Union Special Representative

1.   The mandate of Mr Vygaudas UŠACKAS as the EUSR in Afghanistan is hereby extended until 31 August 2013.

2.   Mr Franz-Michael SKJOLD MELLBIN is hereby appointed as EUSR in Afghanistan for the period from 1 September 2013 to 30 June 2014.

3.   The mandate of the EUSR may be terminated earlier, if the Council so decides, on a proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy (HR).’

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2013.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 75, 23.3.2010, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 193, 16.7.2013, p. 22.

2

---
BROOKS v. ROBINSON.

No. S06A1284.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

October 2, 2006.

Judgment affirmed without opinion.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

BRIAN JOSEPH SMITH

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 2610 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

No. 236 DB 2018

Attorney Registration No. 68911

(Montgomery County)

ORDER

PER CURI AM

AND NOW

, this 18 th day of March

, 202 2

, upon consideration of the parties’

responses to the Court’s rule to show cause dated January 6, 2022, the rule is made

absolute, and the Petition for Reinstatement is denied. Petitioner is directed to pay the

expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of the Petition for

Reinstatement. See Pa.R.D.E. 218(f).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 57 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                        Calendar No. 44
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 57

                          [Report No. 110-19]

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 18, 2007

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           February 15, 2007

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, pertaining to 
                          the Virgin Islands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF CERTAIN LAWS PERTAINING TO THE VIRGIN ISLANDS.

    (a) Repeal.--Sections 1 through 6 of the Act of May 26, 1936 
(Chapter 450; 49 Stat. 1372-1373; 48 U.S.C. 1401-1401e) are repealed.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall be deemed to have taken 
effect on July 22, 1954.
                                                        Calendar No. 44

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                H. R. 57

                          [Report No. 110-19]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To repeal certain sections of the Act of May 26, 1936, pertaining to 
                          the Virgin Islands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 15, 2007

                       Reported without amendment
```
# L_2013165EN.01009801.xml

| 18.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 165/98 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 165/98

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION

of 22 May 2013

concerning the number of members of the European Commission

(2013/272/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 17(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | At its meetings of 11-12 December 2008 and 18-19 June 2009, the European Council noted the concerns of the Irish people with respect to the Treaty of Lisbon and therefore agreed that, provided the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force, a decision would be taken, in accordance with the necessary legal procedures, to the effect that the Commission continue to include one national of each Member State. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

At its meetings of 11-12 December 2008 and 18-19 June 2009, the European Council noted the concerns of the Irish people with respect to the Treaty of Lisbon and therefore agreed that, provided the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force, a decision would be taken, in accordance with the necessary legal procedures, to the effect that the Commission continue to include one national of each Member State.

| (2) | The decision on the number of members of the Commission should be adopted in due time before the appointment of the Commission due to take up its duties on 1 November 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The decision on the number of members of the Commission should be adopted in due time before the appointment of the Commission due to take up its duties on 1 November 2014.

| (3) | The implications of this Decision should be kept under review, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The implications of this Decision should be kept under review,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Commission shall consist of a number of members, including its President and the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, equal to the number of Member States.

Article 2

The European Council shall review this Decision, in view of its effect on the functioning of the Commission, in sufficient time in advance of either the appointment of the first Commission following the date of accession of the 30th Member State or the appointment of the Commission succeeding that due to take up its duties on 1 November 2014, whichever is earlier.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 November 2014.

Done at Brussels, 22 May 2013.

For the European Council

The President

H. VAN ROMPUY

---
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  By:
    /s/ James C. MastandreaJames C. MastandreaChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1



TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.



OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



October 14, 2004



In connection with the Quarterly Report of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Robert McMurrey, Chairman of the Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 14, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert McMurrey                  
|                       |  | Robert McMurrey Chairman of the Board
IN RE J.D.F.

No. COA06-423

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Mitchell (02J7).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed and remanded.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

I, Todd A. Slater, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Chase
Industries Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending June
30, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 14, 2002


                                    /s/ Todd A. Slater
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Todd A. Slater
                                    Title: Vice President and Chief Financial
                                           Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2424

CHRISTINE SOLEM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusJ. CARLTON COURTER, III, Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-99-2-3) Submitted: February 22, 2000 Decided: March 20, 2000 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christine Solem, Appellant Pro Se. John Charles Wilkinson, Jr.,OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Big Stone Gap, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Christine Solem appeals from the district court’s order dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Solem v. Courter , No. CA-99-2-3 (W.D. Va. Sept. 20, 1999). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ELECTRONIC WORLD, INC. v. BAREFOOT.

No. COA04-1049.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 7, 2005.

Certification Date June 27, 2005.

Appeal from Columbus (00CVS258)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
#### Sarah Thorne, Respondent, v Elizabeth S. Grubman, Appellant, et al., Defendants. (And Another Action.)

[799 NYS2d 500]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered September 20, 2004, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when defendant-appellant allegedly backed her vehicle into a crowd of people standing in or near the parking area of a Suffolk County nightclub, denied defendant-appellant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (2) for a change of venue from New York County to Albany County, and order, same court and Justice, also entered September 20, 2004, which, inter alia, denied defendant-appellant’s motion for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs claim for punitive damages as against her, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s evidence of widespread negative publicity, considered together with the public opinion survey of prospective jurors conducted by her expert, does not sufficiently show that an impartial jury cannot be selected in New York County *(see People v Boudin,*90 AD2d 253, 255-256 [1982]). While the survey, assuming its scientific validity, showed that comparatively more residents of New York and Suffolk counties recognized defendant’s name or were aware of the incident than residents of Albany County, it was taken only six months after the incident, while the order on appeal was entered more than three years later. Similarly, most of the news stories on which defendant relies were published within months of the incident. Absent evidence to the contrary, the news coverage has presumably abated and passions have presumably cooled in the interim *(cf. People v Boss,*261 AD2d 1, 3 [1999], citing *Groppi v Wisconsin,*400 US 505, 510 [1971] and *Boudin,*90 AD2d at 257). In any event, even if a similar survey were taken today with the same result, it would show that less than half of the jury pool in New York County is biased against defendant, and would not warrant a change of venue *(cf. Babylon Assoc. v County of Suffolk,*89 AD2d 57, 59 [1982]).

*255Defendant’s motion to dismiss the claim for punitive damages was properly denied inasmuch as an issue of fact is presented as to whether her actions evidence a “ ‘conscious disregard of the rights of others or conduct so reckless as to amount to such disregard’ ” *(Home Ins. Co. v American Home Prods. Corp.,*75 NY2d 196, 203 [1990]), i.e, an utter disregard for the safety of others (PJI 2:278 [2005]). Defendant’s plea to charges of criminally negligent assault and leaving the scene of an accident does not negate the existence of factual issues as to whether her conduct was deliberate. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41706]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14922]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1046-000.
    Applicants: NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Vitol 860537 
eff 07-01-22 to be effective 7/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/6/22.
    Accession Number: 20220706-5063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/18/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: July 7, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-14922 Filed 7-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Willie FORREST, III.

No. 270A04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 17, 2006.

On order of the United States Supreme Court entered 30 June 2006 granting defendant's petition for a writ of certiorari to review our decision reported in 359 N.C. 424, 611 S.E.2d 833 (2005), vacating said judgment and remanding the case to this Court for further consideration in light of *Davis v. Washington,* 547 U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 165 L.Ed.2d 224 (2006). Heard on remand in the Supreme Court 17 October 2006.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Kevin L. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Irving Joyner, Durham, for defendant-appellant.

Robert P. Mosteller, Cooperating Attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina and the North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

Having reconsidered this case on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States in light of *Davis v. Washington,* 547 U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2266, 165 L.Ed.2d 224, the opinion of the Court of Appeals reported at 164 N.C.App. 272, 596 S.E.2d 22 (2004) is vacated. We further conclude that this matter is now moot due to defendant's death and thus allow the State's motion to dismiss defendant's appeal.

VACATED AND DISMISSED AS MOOT.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 File No. 333-37789, Form S-4 File No. 333-28951, Form S-4
File No. 333-23135, Form S-3 File No. 333-53099, Form S-3 File No 333-72611,
Form S-8 File No. 333-22689, Form S-8 File No. 333-41341 and Form S-8 File No.
333-92227 of Boca Resorts, Inc. of our report dated August 12, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Boca Resorts, Inc. included
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 2002.

                                             /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Miami, Florida,
September 27, 2002