alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2

                                  Catcher, Inc.

                                                  As of May 04, 2005

Charles Sander
39526 Charles Town Pike
Hamilton VA 20158

Re:  Employment Agreement

Dear Chuck:

Reference is made to your Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") with
Catcher, Inc. (the "Company") dated April 21, 2005. We wish to memorialize an
obligation the Company has undertaken with respect to your employment with the
Company. By your countersignature of this letter, your Employment Agreement with
the Company shall be deemed amended as set forth in this letter.

In addition to any other remuneration to which you may be entitled under your
Employment Agreement, the Company shall pay you a $20,000 signing bonus for your
execution of the Employment Agreement.

As well, the Company is obliged to reimburse you for your reasonable and
necessary business expenses incurred in connection with your services under the
Employment Agreement.; PROVIDED THAT, such expenses are made, verified and
submitted to the Company for reimbursement in accordance with Company's expense
reimbursement policies. The Company shall provide you a monthly car allowance in
the amount of $700 per month.

If the foregoing reflects your understanding, please sign in the space provided
below and return this letter to the Company whereupon your Employment Agreement
shall be deemed amended hereby.

                                                  Sincerely,
                                                  CATCHER, INC.

                                                  /s/ Ira Tabankin
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  By: Ira Tabankin

ACCEPTED AND AGREED


/s/ Charles Sander
-------------------------
Charles Sander
----

**EXHIBIT      32.4**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                                   |

| Dated:                October 21, 2005 | /s/                Patrick J. Goodman       |   |
|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                        | Patrick                J. Goodman           |   |
|                                        | Vice                President and Treasurer |   |
|                                        | (chief                financial officer)    |   |
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.29

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[LOGO OF BANK OF AMERICA]                                 AMENDMENT TO DOCUMENTS

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                  AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT

     This Amendment No. 1 (the "Amendment") dated as of June 10, 1996 is between
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION (the "Bank") and ORTEL 
CORPORATION (the "Borrower").

                                   RECITALS
                                   --------

     A.   The Bank and the Borrower entered into a certain Business Loan 
Agreement dated as of June 22, 1995 (the "Agreement").

     B.   The Bank and the Borrower desire to amend the Agreement.

                                   AGREEMENT
                                   ---------

     1.   DEFINITIONS.  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment
          -----------
shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement.

     2.   AMENDMENTS.  The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
          ----------

          2.2 In Paragraph 2.2 of the Agreement, the date "December 31, 1996" is
     substituted for the date "May 1, 1996."

     3.   EFFECT OF AMENDMENT.  Except as provided in this Amendment, all of the
          -------------------
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

     This Amendment is executed as of the date stated at the beginning of this 
Amendment.


<TABLE> 
<S>                                                 <C> 
BANK OF AMERICA
NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION              ORTEL CORPORATION



/s/ Kjell Gronvold                                  /s/ Wim H. J. Selders
-----------------------------------                 -------------------------------------------------
By: Kjell Gronvold, Vice President                  By: Wim H. J. Selders, President/Chief Executive
                                                    Officer



                                                    /s/ Stephen K. Workman
                                                    -------------------------------------------------
                                                    By: Stephen K. Workman, Vice President-
                                                    Finance/Chief Financial Officer
</TABLE> 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                     -22-
**Exhibit12.1**

**Hospira,Inc.**

**Computationof Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**

**(Unaudited)**

***(dollars in millions except ratios)***
|                                                               | ** ** | **Six Months**         | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                    | ** ** | **Ended**                   | ** ** |
| ** **                                                    | ** ** | **June 30, 2007** | ** ** |
|                                                          |       |                        |       |
| Income from Continuing  Operations Before Taxes               |       | $                           | 1.3        |   |
| Add (Subtract):                                               |       |                        |       |
| One-third of rents                                            |       | 3.6                         |       |
| Interest on long-term  and short-term debt                    |       | 67.9                        |       |
| Interest capitalized,  net of amortization                    |       | 3.4                         |       |
|                                                          |       |                        |       |
| Earnings from  Continuing Operations                          |       | $                           | 76.2       |   |
|                                                          |       |                        |       |
| Fixed charges:                                                |       |                        |       |
| One-third of rents                                            |       | 3.6                         |       |
| Interest on long-term  and short-term debt                    |       | 67.9                        |       |
| Interest capitalized                                          |       | 5.5                         |       |
|                                                          |       |                        |       |
| Fixed Charges  from Continuing Operations                     |       | $                           | 77.0       |   |
|                                                          |       |                        |       |
| Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges from Continuing Operations |       | 1.0                         |       |

 

For purposes of computingthis ratio, “earnings” consist of income from continuing operations beforetaxes, one-third of rents (deemed by Hospira to be representative of theinterest factor inherent in rents), interest expense and interest capitalized,net of amortization.  “Fixed charges”consist of one-third of rents, interest expense as reported in the Company’sconsolidated financial statements and interest capitalized.

28

----
MELVIN v. STONE.

No. COA05-428.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Sampon (02CVS1292).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
30 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

General Dynamics $5.6 B

United Technologies $5.6 B

Lockheed Martin $2.8 B

Kaman Corp. $91.1 M

Ensign-Bickford Industries $71.1 M

Timken $40.0 M

Triumph Group Inc. $30.0 M

Colt Defense Holding $27.8 M

PCX Aerostructures $27.4 M

Leonardo SpA $27.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

CONNECTICUT

#8 #7 3.2% $4,439 #6 #38 #37

$15.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

5.7% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $15.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

14,791 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$687.4 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

14,791

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

New London 4,074 1,462 1,052 71 6,659

Hartford 36 797 2,154 657 3,644

New Haven 75 63 446 485 1,069

Middlesex ND 59 646 342

Fairfield 13 233 397 315 958

Tolland 78 ND 42 ND

Litchfield ND 11 ND ND

Windham ND ND ND ND ND

Construction: 0% Research and

Development: 8%

Service: 9%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 83%

Active Duty: 38%

Civilian: 18%

National 

Guard: 32%

Reserve: 13%

11%

72%

14%

4%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

36%

49%

10%

4%

$12.5 $12.7

$10.1

$12.8 $12.5

$14.4

$10.3

$15.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 31

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Litchfield Hartford

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven

CONNECTICUT FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Hartford

New London

Fairfield

New Haven

Middlesex

Litchfield

Tolland

Windham

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$6.0 B

$5.8 B

$3.0 B

$177.3 M

$50.6 M

$46.1 M

$45.1 M

$22.4 M

New London

Hartford

Fairfield

New Haven

Middlesex

Tolland

Litchfield

Windham

$380.6 M

$120.5 M

$36.0 M

$31.1 M

$24.3 M

$6.5 M

$599.5 K

$413.7 K

Litchfield Hartford

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven
# L_2013138EN.01001401.xml

| 24.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 138/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 138/14

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 May 2013

appointing a Slovakian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2013/232/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Slovakian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1).

| (2) | A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Ján GAŠPERAN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Ján GAŠPERAN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Emil MACHYNA, predseda Odborového zväzu KOVO, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 14 May 2013.

For the Council

The President

M. NOONAN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.

1

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5695 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require applications 

for voter registration with respect to elections for Federal office to 

include a statement that an alien who falsely claims to be a citizen 

of the United States is deportable under the Immigration and Nationality 

Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2008 

Ms. GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida (for herself and Mr. BILBRAY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 

Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to 

require applications for voter registration with respect 

to elections for Federal office to include a statement 

that an alien who falsely claims to be a citizen of the 

United States is deportable under the Immigration and 

Nationality Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Noncitizen Voting Pre5 vention Act of 2008’’. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5695 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING APPLICATIONS FOR VOTER REGISTRA2 TION TO INCLUDE STATEMENT REGARDING 

3 DEPORTABILITY OF ALIENS MAKING FALSE 

4 CLAIMS OF UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP. 

5 (a) CONTENTS OF APPLICATIONS FOR VOTER REG6 ISTRATION.—Section 9(b) of the National Voter Registra7 tion Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg–7(b)) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

9 (3); 

10 (2) by striking the period at the end of para11 graph (4) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

13 paragraph: 

14 ‘‘(5) shall include a statement that an alien who 

15 falsely represents himself to be a citizen of the 

16 United States for any purpose or benefit under law, 

17 including registering to vote, is deportable under 

18 section 237(a)(3)(D) of the Immigration and Na19 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1227(a)(3)(D)).’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 subsection (a) shall take effect upon the expiration of the 

22 90-day period which begins on the date of the enactment 

23 of this Act, and shall apply with respect to elections occur24 ring after the expiration of such period. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5695 IH

1 SEC. 3. REQUIRING POSTING AT POLLING PLACES OF NO2 TICE REGARDING ILLEGAL VOTING BY NON3 CITIZENS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 302(b)(2)(F) of the Help 

5 America Vote Act of 2002 (42 U.S.C. 15482(b)(2)(F)) is 

6 amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 

7 the following: ‘‘, as well as a specific statement that it 

8 is a violation of Federal law for an individual who is not 

9 a citizen of the United States to cast a ballot in an election 

10 for Federal office.’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to elections occur13 ring after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2





TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.





OFFICERS CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)





The undersigned J. Kernan Crotty appointed and incumbent officer ofTELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the Corporation), in
connection with the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Fiscal Quarter ended August 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), does hereby represent, warrant and
certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that to the best of his knowledge:





1.  The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Corporation.





October 15, 2002





By:

/s/    J. KERNAN
CROTTYJ. Kernan Crotty President and
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, GREGORY W. HUNT, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ GREGORY W. HUNTName: Gregory W. HuntDate: February 6, 2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOHN LEO CERIZO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10581

D.C. No. 1:04-cr-00222-SOM-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Hawaii

Susan Oki Mollway, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 10, 2013**

Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, FISHER and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

1. A district court may order restitution as part of supervised release, see 18

U.S.C. § 3563, and adjust a restitution payment schedule in light of changes in the

“defendant’s economic circumstances,” 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k). The district court

FILED

OCT 18 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
didn’t abuse its discretion by requiring Cerizo to pay his underinsured motorist

insurance award and unclaimed life insurance award towards restitution as a

condition of his supervised release. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974,

981 (9th Cir. 2009).

2. Cerizo’s claim that the district court erred in denying him bail pending

his supervised release hearing is moot. Even if it were not, Cerizo’s long history of

dishonesty and ties outside Hawaii and the United States provided an ample basis

for denying his bail request. See United States v. Garcia, 340 F.3d 1013, 1015 (9th

Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 4, 2021

NO. 03-21-00522-CR

Martin Dale Walker, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 6 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
FILED: January 8, 2019
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL S FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________ No. 17

- 2449 (7:17

- cv
- 00169

- FL) (16

- 01964

- 5

- SWH) (16

- 00031

- 5

- SWH)

___________________ LARRY ALBERT HURLBURT

Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
JULIET J. BLACK

Defendant

- Appellee

and
JOSEPH A. BLEDSOE, III

Trustee

___________________ O R D E R

___________________ A majority of judges in regular active service and not d isqualified having voted in a requested poll of the court to grant appellant ’ s petition for rehearing en
banc,IT IS ORDERED that rehearing en banc is granted. The parties shall file 16 additional paper copies of their briefs and appendice s previously filed in this case within 10 days. This case is tentatively calendared for oral argument at the March 19

- 21, 2019, oral argument session.

For the Court
/s/ Patricia S. Connor, Clerk
1 In The


### Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________
N O . 09

- 19

- 00297

- CV NO. 0 9

- 19

- 00321

- CV

__________________ BROCK HOLDINGS III, LLC AND CUSTOM BLAST SERVICES INC. , Appellant s

V.

PARTNER INDUSTRIAL COATINGS , LP, PARTNER INDUSTRIAL, LP, AND TODD BROCK , Appellee s

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 60th District Court Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. B

- 20 3 ,903

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
On January 27, 2020, appellees filed an unopposed motion to abate these
accelerated appeals to permit the parties to complete settlement negotiations, and on
February 6, 2020, this Court entered an order abating these appeals. On February 18,
2020, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss these accelerated appeals in
accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.2 We reinstate the appeals, grant the parti es’ joint motion, and dismiss these
accelerated appeals in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.

APPEALS DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 2 , 2020 Opinion Delivered March 5, 2020
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger an d Horton , JJ.