alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cite as 2015 Ark. 282



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. IN RE APPELLATE MOTION ELECTRONIC

- FILING PILOT PROJECT Opinion Delivered June 18, 2015

PER CURIAM Administrative Order Number 21 encourages every court of this state to implement an electronic filing system and vests this court with the authority to adopt electronic filing in the appellate courts of this state. See Ark. Sup. Ct. Admin. Order No.
21 (3)(a)(3)

– (4). Pursuant to that Ord er , we announce our intent to implement an electronic filing system in this court and the court of appeals as soon as practicable. To that end, we authorize the establishment of an electronic-filing pilot project limited to select motions filed in the appellate courts to begin this summer as a first step toward mandatory electronic filing in the appellate courts

. See id. § (3)(b). Upon the Administrative Office of the Court’s (“AOC”) completion of the technical changes needed to provide electronic filing of motions in the appellate courts, parties shall be permitted to file and serve select motions and petitions, and any responses thereto, via the electronic system, eFlex, which is provided by the AOC. In the interim, however, parties will not be permitted to electronically file or serve any motion or petition that requires the payment of any fee as a prerequisite to the filing. Parties who elect to file documents electronically shall be excused from the requirements of Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 2-1(b) regarding the filing of paper copies.Cite as 2015 Ark. 282

2 Should there be any other irreconcilable discrepancies between Administrative Order Number 21 and the Rules of the Supreme Court, Administrative Order Number 21 shall govern with respect to electronic filings until such time as the court amends the Rules to accommodate electronic filing. Additionally, the clerk of this court is authorized to promulgate and update policies and procedures for the implementation of this order and for the use and operation of the electronic-filing and document-management systems. Persons with existing eFlex accounts will not be required to take any further steps to acquire electronic filing capabilities in the appellate courts. Persons who have not yet acquired an eFlex account should follow the AOC’s registration requirements available at https://courts.arkansas.gov/administration/acap/efile to access the electronic filing system.
exv10w5



 






Exhibit No. 10.5




Summary of remuneration, retirement compensation

and group life insurance of the Chairman of the Board,

Directors and Chairman of Nortel Networks Corporation

effective June 29, 2005.




 









 








NORTEL
NETWORKS CORPORATION (THE “CORPORATION”)



DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION 

(Updated to reflect changes effective June 29, 2005)



All information contained in this summary has been previously disclosed in public filings of the
Corporation.




	 	 	 
	 	 	US Dollars
	 
	 	 
	COMMITTEE MEMBER RETAINERS:

	 	$12,500 per annum(1)
	Audit Committee(1)
	 	 
	Committee on Directors
	 	 
	Joint Leadership Resources Committee(2)
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN RETAINER(3)

	 	$15,000 per annum(4)*
	 
	 	 
	AUDIT COMMITTEE CHAIRMAN RETAINER

	 	$35,000 per annum(5)*






Note:





	1.	 	If on same Nortel Networks Limited Committee, Committee member retainer is $6,250 per annum
	 
	2.	 	Joint committee of the Board of Directors of the Corporation and Nortel Networks Limited
	 
	3.	 	Except Audit Committee
	 
	4.	 	If Chairman of same Nortel Networks Limited Committee, Chairman retainer is $7,500 per annum
	 
	5.	 	If Chairman of same Nortel Networks Limited Committee, Chairman retainer is $17,500 per annum





DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED SHARE COMPENSATION PLAN



The payment of fees may, at the election of the director, be deferred under the Nortel Networks
Corporation Directors Deferred Share Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). Directors are entitled to
elect to receive all or a portion of their fees in the form of share units under the Plan
(entitling the Directors to receive an equal number of common shares of the Corporation), with the
remainder of such Fees to be paid in cash. The share units will be settled subject to and in
accordance with the Plan upon a Director’s retirement from the Board of Directors.




Note:





	1.	 	Directors’ fees are paid in quarterly installments at the end of each calendar quarter.
	 
	2.	 	Directors’ fees generally are not payable to Directors who are salaried employees of Nortel
Networks Corporation, Nortel Networks Limited or of any of its or their subsidiaries.
	 
	*	 	Change approved June 29, 2005.
ALLRED v. FIRST BANK NAT. ASS'N TRUST.

No. COA06-617.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (04CVS5012).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
SMITH v. RICHARDSON SPORTS, et al.

No. 566P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Shannon P. Metcalf, Hatcher B. Kincheloe, Charlotte, for Richardson Sports, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of April 2006 by Plaintiff to Remand:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of June 2006."

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON recused.
# L_2013193EN.01001901.xml

| 16.7.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 193/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 193/19

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EU BAM RAFAH/1/2013

of 9 July 2013

on the appointment of the Head of European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah)

(2013/379/EU)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP of 25 November 2005 on establishing a European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah) (1), and in particular Article 10(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP, the Political and Security Committee is authorised, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah), including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | On 23 May 2013, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Mr Gerhard SCHLAUDRAFF as Head of EU BAM Rafah from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 23 May 2013, the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy proposed the appointment of Mr Gerhard SCHLAUDRAFF as Head of EU BAM Rafah from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014.

| (3) | Council Decision 2013/355/CFSP of 3 July 2013 amending and extending Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP on establishing a European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah) (2) extended the duration of EU BAM Rafah until 30 June 2014, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Council Decision 2013/355/CFSP of 3 July 2013 amending and extending Joint Action 2005/889/CFSP on establishing a European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah) (2) extended the duration of EU BAM Rafah until 30 June 2014,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Gerhard SCHLAUDRAFF is hereby appointed Head of European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah) from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

It shall apply from 1 July 2013.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2013.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 327, 14.12.2005, p. 28.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 185, 4.7.2013, p. 16.

2

---
STATE v. James Hanna KELLY.

No. 199P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*891The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of April 2006 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeals":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of June 2006."
sjdocs-7222671v153116_nation.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing



 


PROMISSORY NOTE


US$23,100.00                                                                                                                        
May 31, 2016


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, NATION
ENERGY INC. (the “Borrower”), promises to pay to the order of JOHN
R. HISLOP (the “Lender”) the principal sum of TWENTY-THREE
THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS (US$23,100.00) in lawful currency of the United States (the “Principal Sum”),
together with interest thereon as herein provided.


The Principal Sum or such amount as shall
remain outstanding from time to time and shall bear interest, thereon,
calculated quarterly, not in advance, at a rate of fifteen percent (15%) per
annum upon demand by the Lender, both before and after each of maturity,
default and judgment commencing effective May 31, 2016.  In the event of any
partial repayment made on the Principal Sum, such payments shall be applied
firstly towards accrued interest and then towards the Principal Sum.


The Principal Sum and all accrued and unpaid
interest at the rate aforesaid will become due and payable on May 31, 2023
(the “Term”).  Extension of time of payment of all or any part of the
amount owing hereunder at any time or times and failures of the Lender to
enforce any of their rights or remedies hereunder shall not release the
Borrower from its obligations hereunder or constitute a waiver of the rights of
the Lender to enforce any rights and remedies therein.


On default in payment of any sum due
hereunder for the Principal Sum or interest or after 15 days’ notice of Default
to the Borrower, the unpaid balance of the Principal Sum and all accrued interest
thereon shall at the option of the Lender forthwith become due and payable.


This Promissory Note shall be governed by
the laws of the Province of British Columbia.


The undersigned will have the privilege of prepaying in whole or
in part the Principal Sum and accrued interest.


Presentment, protest, notice of protest and
notice of dishonour are
hereby waived.


 


                                                                                NATION
ENERGY INC.


 


/s/
John R. Hislop                                                   /s/
Carmen J. Lotito                                        

JOHN R. HISLOP                                                  CARMEN J.
LOTITO, Vice President
STATE v. AUSTIN.

No. COA05-85.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Rowan (02CRS50572, 02CRS001146, 02CRS001147, 02CRS001148).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. CARTER.

No. COA06-102.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS206017, 04CRS209203, 04CRS209204, 04CRS209205, 04CRS209206, 04CRS209208, 04CRS13398).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# C_2013185EN.01005901.xml

| 28.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/59

---

Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the Office of the Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC Office) for the financial year 2012 — Amending Budget No 1

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 52 of 22 February 2013
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 52 of 22 February 2013

(2013/C 185/13)

On page 42, in the table, the following Title 3 must be added between Titles 2 and 4:

‘TITLE 3 — EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION (EFTA) CONTRIBUTION

CHAPTER 3 0 — EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION (EFTA) CONTRIBUTION

Figures

| Budget 2012 | Amending budget No 1/2012 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 111 616 | – 111 616 | p.m’ |

Budget 2012

Amending budget No 1/2012

New amount

111 616

– 111 616

p.m’

---
----

**EXHIBIT        32.4**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY        ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly                  period                  ended June 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company.                                                                                                                                                                   |

| Dated:                  August 10, 2005 | /s/                  Patrick J. Goodman       |   |
|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                         | Patrick                  J. Goodman           |   |
|                                         | Vice                  President and Treasurer |   |
|                                         | (chief                  financial officer)    |   |
STATE of North Carolina v. Douglas PAGE, Jr.

No. 373P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 14, 2006.

Douglas Page, Jr., Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: 169 N.C.App. 127, 609 S.E.2d 432.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 13th day of July 2006 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cumberland County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of July 2006."
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3052 

To provide for the transfer of naval vessels to certain foreign recipients. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2008 

Mr. BIDEN (for himself and Mr. LUGAR) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To provide for the transfer of naval vessels to certain foreign 

recipients. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Naval Vessel Transfer 

5 Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TRANSFER OF NAVAL VESSELS TO CERTAIN FOR7 EIGN RECIPIENTS. 

8 (a) TRANSFERS BY GRANT.—The President is au9 thorized to transfer vessels to foreign recipients on a grant 

10 basis under section 516 of the Foreign Assistance Act of 

11 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j), as follows: 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3052 IS

1 (1) PAKISTAN.—To the Government of Paki2 stan, the OLIVER HAZARD PERRY class guided 

3 missile frigate MCINERNEY (FFG–8). 

4 (2) GREECE.—To the Government of Greece, 

5 the OSPREY class minehunter coastal ships OS6 PREY (MHC–51) and ROBIN (MHC–54). 

7 (3) CHILE.—To the Government of Chile, the 

8 KAISER class oiler ANDREW J. HIGGINS (AO– 

9 190). 

10 (4) PERU.—To the Government of Peru, the 

11 NEWPORT class amphibious tank landing ships 

12 FRESNO (LST–1182) and RACINE (LST–1191). 

13 (b) GRANTS NOT COUNTED IN ANNUAL TOTAL OF

14 TRANSFERRED EXCESS DEFENSE ARTICLES.—The value 

15 of a vessel transferred to a recipient on a grant basis pur16 suant to authority provided by subsection (a) shall not be 

17 counted against the aggregate value of excess defense arti18 cles transferred in any fiscal year under section 516 of 

19 the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j). 

20 (c) COSTS OF TRANSFERS.—Any expense incurred by 

21 the United States in connection with a transfer authorized 

22 by this section shall be charged to the recipient (notwith23 standing section 516(e) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 

24 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2321j(e))). 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•S 3052 IS

1 (d) REPAIR AND REFURBISHMENT IN UNITED

2 STATES SHIPYARDS.—To the maximum extent prac3 ticable, the President shall require, as a condition of the 

4 transfer of a vessel under this section, that the recipient 

5 to which the vessel is transferred have such repair or re6 furbishment of the vessel as is needed, before the vessel 

7 joins the naval forces of the recipient, performed at a ship8 yard located in the United States, including a United 

9 States Navy shipyard. 

10 (e) EXPIRATION OF AUTHORITY.—The authority to 

11 transfer a vessel under this section shall expire at the end 

12 of the 2-year period beginning on the date of the enact13 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
erb20160705_8k.htm


Exhibit 10.1

 

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Second Amendment”) is made as of this 5 day of July, 2016, by and between ERBA Diagnostics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Mohan Gopalkrishnan (the “Executive”).

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated effective as of June 1, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”); 

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are parties to that certain Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of May 26, 2016 (the “First Amendment”), pursuant to which, among other things, the Executive’s annual base salary was increased, effective as of June 1, 2016, from $230,000 to $300,000; 

 

WHEREAS, the Executive has elected to forego such increase in annual base salary, to be retroactively effective as of June 1, 2016; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, in the manner set forth in this Second Amendment.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and agreements set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Executive hereby mutually agree as follows:

 

1.       Base Salary. The Executive’s annual base salary shall, effective as of June 1, 2016, be decreased from $300,000 to $230,000. Accordingly, the first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, is hereby further amended, effective as of June 1, 2016, to delete the dollar amount of “$300,000” and to replace it with the dollar amount of “$230,000”.

 

2.       Miscellaneous. The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Second Amendment shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida, without regard to its conflicts of law principles. Except as specifically amended by this Second Amendment, the Employment Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment, shall remain unaffected and in full force and effect.

 

[Signature page follows]

 


 

 




 


 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Company and the Executive has duly executed this Second Amendment as of the day and year first above set forth.

 

	COMPANY:	 	 	EXECUTIVE:	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	
ERBA Diagnostics, Inc., 

a Delaware corporation
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	By:	/s/ Suresh Vazirani	
 
	
 
	/s/ Mohan Gopalkrishnan	
 

	 	
Suresh Vazirani,
	
 
	
 
	
Mohan Gopalkrishnan
	
 

	 	
Executive Chairman
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                         ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

Bank One, West Virginia, N.A., as Trustee
707 Virginia Street East, 2nd Floor
Charleston, West Virginia  25301

Attention:  Corporate Trust Department

     I, C. David Ramsey, President of Southpoint Structured Assets Inc. (the
"Depositor"), hereby certify as follows:

     (a) The review of the activities of the Depositor under the Standard
Terms for Trust Agreements, dated as of November 1, 1996, as amended by the
Series Supplement, dated as of November 27, 1996 (collectively, the "Trust
Agreement"), by and between the Depositor and Bank One, West Virginia, N.A., as
trustee, for the period from November 27, 1996 through December 31, 1996, and
the performance of the Depositor under the Trust Agreement has been made under
my supervision; and

     (b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Depositor has
fulfilled all of its obligations and covenants under the Trust Agreement
throughout such period.

     Dated:  March 31, 1997

                                     Sincerely,


                                     /s/ C. David Ramsey
                                     ----------------------------
                                     C. David Ramsey, President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,067,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  830,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                    66,956
<INVENTORY>                                  1,012,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,971,132
<PP&E>                                       1,477,213
<DEPRECIATION>                                 961,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              15,272,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,769,180
<BONDS>                                     21,461,041
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           385
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,304,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                15,272,610
<SALES>                                      3,039,678
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,047,178
<CGS>                                          910,027
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,626,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            19,641,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,499,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,071,638)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,071,638)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.96)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.96)


</TABLE>