alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert M. Neumeister, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media West LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designated under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Omitted pursuant to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Release
No. 33-8238; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. August 12, 2004 By:
    /s/ Robert M. Neumeister, Jr.Robert M. Neumeister, Jr.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
IN RE C.C.L.

No. COA06-462

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Mecklenburg (03J1240).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. David Lee ALFORD.

No. 131P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

David Lee Alford, Pro Se.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, Howard S. Boney, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 28th day of February 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER
28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                             221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,081
<INVENTORY>                                     36,579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,739
<PP&E>                                          14,709
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,936)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (31,950)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           (9)
<OTHER-SE>                                    (51,091)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 (133,906)
<SALES>                                         47,768
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,768
<CGS>                                           30,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,497
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   265
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,047
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    386
<INCOME-TAX>                                       164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                222
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Dejuan Marcus WALL.

No. 241P03-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Diane Reeves, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Parker, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th day of April 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Plain Error Review N.C.G.S. 7A-28(B)(1)(2)(3)(4)":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of June 2006."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5631 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5631

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ``Corporal 
                 Bradley T. Arms Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CORPORAL BRADLEY T. ARMS POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Corporal 
Bradley T. Arms Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
MOODY v. NATIONWIDE MUT. INS. CO.

No. COA04-243

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed February 1, 2005

Certification Date February 21, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
CLINARD OIL CO., INC. v. OIL PRODUCTS CO.

No. COA05-1087.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Davidson (03CVS3630)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 22, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00037

- CV

River Creek Development Corporation and City of Hutto, Texas , Appellant s

v.

Preston Hollow Capital, LLC; 79 HCD Development, LLC; Public Finance Authority; and U.S. Bank National Association , Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the tr i a l court on December 6, 2022

. Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no reversible error

in the judgment

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial court’s judgment

. A ppellant s shall pay all

costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
STATE v. William Henry RAINES.

No. 211A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 20, 2007.

Jonathan E. Broun, Durham, for Raines.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Joan Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of February 2007 by Defendant to Deem Brief Timely Filed:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 20th day of February 2007."
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 23.01



               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 Nos 333-31115, and 333-38833) pertaining to the 1996 Incentive Stock Option
Plan, 1996 Incentive Stock Option Plan No. 2, 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
and 1997 Equity Incentive Plan of At Home Corporation of our report dated
January 19, 1998, except for Note 10, as to which the date is March 18, 1998,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of At Home Corporation
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1997.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



San Jose, California
March 30, 1998
BATTLE v. DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF LaGRANGE

No. S06A0999.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

July 13, 2006.

Judgment affirmed without opinion.
STATE v. ANDERSON.

No. COA06-328.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS216136, 05CRS24280).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. Tosha McDOUGAL.

No. 581P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2007.

Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th day of December 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Writ of Discretionary Review":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 25th day of January 2007."
IN RE A.M.Z.

COA06-130.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from Johnston (04J163)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          29,602
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               992,427
<PP&E>                                      20,377,577
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,519,337
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,850,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          863,060
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,372
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,172,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,850,667
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               779,190
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  540,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             318,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (79,838)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (79,838)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (79,838)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1999
<CASH>                                       4,006,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,135,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   500,000
<INVENTORY>                                 18,809,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            49,751,000
<PP&E>                                      68,601,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              29,226,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              90,582,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,679,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  70,981,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                90,582,000
<SALES>                                     54,166,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            54,166,000
<CGS>                                       33,397,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,397,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,956,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,014,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,855,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,159,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,159,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60


</TABLE>
Exhibit






SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF SALE AND PURCHASE


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT OF SALE AND PURCHASE (this “Amendment”) is made as of this 11th day of July, 2016, by and between HR VENTURE PROPERTIES I LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as “Seller”), and NEW MARKET PROPERTIES, LLC, a Maryland limited liability company (hereinafter referred to as “Purchaser”).


W I T N E S S E T H  T H A T:


WHEREAS, Purchaser and Seller entered into that certain Agreement of Sale and Purchase dated as of June 24, 2016 (as amended to date, the “Contract”), with respect to certain property as more particularly described in the Contract (the “Property”); 


WHEREAS, Purchaser and Seller desire to amend the Contract as set forth below;


NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Purchaser and Seller hereby agree as follows:


1.    Defined Terms.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Contract.


2.    Contingency Date.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary provided in the Contract, Purchaser and Seller hereby acknowledge and agree that the “Contingency Date” shall mean July 12, 2016.


3.    Ratification.  Except as expressly modified hereby, the Contract shall remain unamended and in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed by the parties hereto.  


4.    Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


5.    Facsimile or E-Mail.  The faxed or e-mailed signature of any party shall be binding upon such party.




[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Purchaser and Seller have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the date indicated below.


SELLER:
HR VENTURE PROPERTIES I LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
By:    HR Retail Venture I LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company, its sole member


By:    Hines REIT Retail Holdings LLC,
a Delaware limited liability 
company, its sole member




By: /s/ Kevin L. McMeans        


Name: Kevin L. McMeans        


Title: Manager                




PURCHASER:
NEW MARKET PROPERTIES, LLC, a Maryland 
limited liability company




By:/s/ Joel T. Murphy                


Name: Joel T. Murphy            


Title: Chief Executive Officer
GANNETT PACIFIC CORPORATION d/b/a Asheville Citizen-Times Publishing Company, an Hawaii Corporation, and Chesapeake Television, Inc. t/d/b/a WLOS-TV, a Maryland Corporation v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE and County of Buncombe.

No. 415P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

James Gary Rowe, Asheville, for Gannett Pacific Corp.

Robert W. Oast, Jr., for City of Asheville.

Joseph Connolly, Asheville, for County of Buncombe.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 632 S.E.2d 586.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of August 2006 by Plaintiff (Gannett Pacific Corp.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
LABRANDON BODISON , Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D 13

- 6210

______ _______________________/ Opinion filed April 15, 2015. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Jonathan E. Sjostrom , Judge

. Jeffrey E. Lewis, Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, and Melissa J. Ford, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Off ice of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region One, Tallahassee , for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders * appeal, appellant raises a scrivener’s error in his sentence.
H e notes that when the court orally pronounced his sentence in case number 2012

- CF

- 503 , the court stated that sentence was to run concurrently with the sentences imposed in case number 20 11

- CF

- 622. However, in the written judgment and

* Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).sentence, the court failed to place a ch eck mark on the appropriate line indicating that the sentence in case number 2012

- CF

- 503 was to run concurrently. Appellant preserved this issue by filing a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). However, the trial court failed to rule on the motion within 60 days, and thus it was deemed denied. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b) (1)(B)

. The State was given the opportunity to respond to this Anders appeal pursuant to Harrison v. State , 146 So. 3d 76, 80

- 81 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), and agrees that th e

e rror should be corrected

. We reverse and remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement. See Knight v. State , 114 So. 3d 1067 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013). Appellant need not be present for the correction of this scr iven er’s error. Appellant’s judgment and sentence are otherwise affirmed. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND REMANDED with instructions. LEWIS, C.J., WOLF, and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.

2
STATE v. Rodney Earl COFFIN.

No. 405P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2006.

Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Winifred H. Dillon, Raleigh, for Rodney Earl Coffin.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of August 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion for Stay Dissolved by order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of December 2006."
exv10w3



 






EXHIBIT 10.3



Mindspeed Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) has entered into an agreement with each of the
following persons, which is substantially identical, except as set forth below, to the Form of
Employment Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.8.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10
(File No. 1-31650):




Simon Biddiscombe




David W. Carroll




Mojy C. Chian




Raouf Y. Halim




Thomas J. Medrek




Wayne K. Nesbit




Daryush Shamlou




Thomas A. Stites




Bradley W. Yates



The multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for Mr. Halim is three and
the multiple set forth in Section 6(i)(B) of the Employment Agreement for the other persons is two.