alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Kroll
Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Michael G.
Cherkasky, Chief Executive Officer of Kroll Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                              
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                             
|
| | 2. The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of Kroll Inc.



| |     |                         
| | --- | ------------------------
| | By: | /s/ MICHAEL G. CHERKASKY

| |                                                                  
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| | ______________________________________ 
     Michael G. Cherkasky
| | Chief Executive Officer                                          

Date: March 28, 2003
**Exhibit
32.2**
 
 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
 Sarbanes
- Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of PLM Income Fund I (the “Fund”), on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Manager and of the Fund, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 (1)  the
Report of the Fund filed today fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.
 
 
 
 /s/
Richard K Brock
 Richard K
Brock
 Chief
Financial Officer of PLM Financial Services, Inc.
 (Principal
Financial Officer)
 August
10, 2005
**EXHIBIT        32**

**CERTIFICATION        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

** AND        CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                  Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarterly period ended September                  30,                  2007 (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section                  13(a)                  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m                  or 78o(d));                  and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all                  material                  respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of                  the                  Corporation. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  Carol K. Nelson                                   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Carol                  K. Nelson, President and CEO          |
| /s/                Lars H. Johnson                                     |
| Lars                H. Johnson, Chief Financial                Officer |

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Rex Dean PENLAND.

No. 139A94-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Kenneth J. Rose, Durham, Stephen G. Royster, Mount Airy, for Rex Dean Penland.

Barry S. McNeill, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Ricky Bowman, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by the Attorney General on the 3rd day of March 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Stokes County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
STATE v. WELLS.

COA06-45.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (04CRS217364, 04CRS220263, 04CRS47680, 04CRS47681).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,418
<SECURITIES>                                    13,665
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,374
<ALLOWANCES>                                       943
<INVENTORY>                                        244
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   392
<PP&E>                                           4,858
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,604
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,174
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,439
<SALES>                                         18,469
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,308
<CGS>                                            1,541
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,077
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,880
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,535)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,164
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,699)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,699)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. WINCHESTER.

No. COA06-643.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (04CRS251205, 04CRS251206, 04CRS251207, 04CRS251208).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
Untitled Document





ICU MEDICAL,
INC.  
ICU MEDICAL (UTAH), INC.  
951 CALLE AMANECER  
SAN CLEMENTE, CALIFORNIA 92673 


July 8, 2005 


Hospira, Inc.

275 N. Field Drive  
Building H1, Department 0960  
Lake Forest, Illinois 60045-2579

Attention:  Chief Executive Officer
 


		Re: 	 	 Manufacturing
Commercialization  and Development 
 Agreement dated February 25, 2005  between  
ICU
Medical, Inc. and Hospira, Inc.






Dear Mr. Begley:
 


     The
above-referenced Manufacturing  Commercialization and Development Agreement was assigned
by  Buyer to ICU Medical (Utah), Inc. (“Newco”) by means of an  Assignment and
Assumption Agreement dated February 28, 2005  and supplemented and/or amended by a letter
agreement dated  February 25, 2005 between ICU Medical, Inc. and Hospira,  Inc., a letter
agreement dated May 1, 2005 among ICU  Medical, Inc., Newco and Hospira, Inc. (the “May
1 Letter  Agreement”) and an undated letter agreement among ICU  Medical, Inc.,
Newco and Hospira, Inc. (as supplemented  and/or amended, the “Agreement”).
This letter agreement  amends the Agreement.  Capitalized terms used, but not  defined,
in this letter agreement have the meanings ascribed  to them in the Agreement.  Except as
expressly amended by  this letter agreement, the Agreement remains in full force  and
effect.  In the event of any conflict or inconsistency  between this letter agreement and
the Agreement, this letter  agreement shall control.
 


Section
2.7(b)(i)
 


     The
entire text of the four paragraphs immediately  following the caption “Section
2.7(b)(i)” in the May 1  Letter Agreement are deleted and of no further force and
effect.
 


Please indicate
your agreement to the foregoing by singing  below.
 


	ICU Medical, Inc.	ICU
    Medical (Utah), Inc.
	 	 
	 	 
	By:
    /s/ Francis J. O’Brien	By:
    /s/ Francis J. O’Brien
	Name:  Francis J. O’Brien	Name:  Francis J. O’Brien
	 	 
	Agreed and Accepted this 13th day

    of July, 2005	 
	 	 
	Hospira, Inc.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By:      /s/ Terrence C. Kearney	 
	Name: Terrence C. Kearney
MISSION HOSPITALS v. RADIATION THERAPY.

No. 498P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 15, 2006.

Robert V. Bode, S. Todd Hemphill, Diana Evans Ricketts, Matthew A. Fisher, Raleigh, for Asheville Hematology.

June S. Ferrell, Assistant Attorney General, for DHR.

Susan H. Hargrove, Sean A. Timmons, Jennifer B. Markham, Raleigh, for NC Radiation Therapy.

Maureen D. Murray, Allyson Jones Labbon, Greensboro, William W. Stewart, Raleigh, for Mission Hospitals.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of September 2006 by Intervenor for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 15th day of September 2006."
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5540 

AN ACT 

To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to 

provide for the continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5540 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Chesapeake Bay Gate3 ways and Watertrails Network Continuing Authorization 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

6 Section 502 of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 

7 1998 (16 U.S.C. 461 note; Public Law 105–312) is 

8 amending by striking subsection (c) and inserting the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

11 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are nec12 essary to carry out this section.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5540 

AN ACT 

To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 

Network. of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 1998 to provide for the continuing authorization
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5483 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, as the ‘‘Private First Class David H. Sharrett 

II Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

HR 5483 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS DAVID H. SHARRETT II 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 10449 White Granite Drive in 

5 Oakton, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Private First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Private First Class 

12 David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Sarah Taylor, on Behalf of Donnie Taylor Jr. et al., Infants, Appellant, v Aon Corporation et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 684]

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed May 24, 2004, which granted death benefits to decedent’s domestic partner.

Claimant, the ex-wife of decedent, who was killed in the World Trade Center attacks on September 11, 2001, applied for death benefits on behalf of their two children. She raises constitutional challenges to Workers’ Compensation Law § 4 following a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding death benefits to decedent’s domestic partner to the financial detriment of her children. Since the facts and arguments being raised in this case are indistinguishable from those raised and decided by this Court in *Matter of Novara v Cantor Fitzgerald, LP*(20 AD3d 103 [2005]),* the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board is affirmed.

Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

*

 Notably, the same attorney represents claimant in this proceeding and the claimant in *Matter of Novara v Cantor Fitzgerald, LP (supra)*and submitted virtually identical briefs in both cases.
STATE v. BRITT.

COA06-298.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Harnett (05CRS460, 05CRS10632).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN RE Y.Q.M.

No. COA05-989.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from Sampson (00J29).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

          We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-13815)
of our report dated October 14, 1996, except for Notes 5 and 12, for which the
date is October 16, 1996, and for Notes 7 and 12, for which the date is October
18, 1996 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. as of September 30, 1996
and for the eight months ended September 30, 1996 and of the Predecessor
Business as of September 30, 1995 and for the years ended September 30, 1994 and
1995 and the four months ended January 31, 1996, which report is included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                 COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P

San Jose, California
December 20, 1996
Junius H. TERRELL, Rudy Alvey, Rachel Alvey, Bill Campbell, Harriet Carter, Winslow Carter, Tony Ciochetti, Debra Eagle, James Foster, Elaine Foster, Joseph Froeber, Tanya Froeber, Fulston Hartzog, Jack Imperiale, Sr., David Keesee, Susan Keesee, Dominique Lahaussois, David Low, Jane McCauley, Robert Murdock, Beverly Murdock, Kim Oglesby, Eric Oldham, Margie Oldham, Phil Partin, Martha Partin, ED Pellizzari, Barbara Pellizzari, Zona Pollard, ED Ralston, Patsy Reinberg, Robert Roach, Freda Roach, Douglas Shackleford, *200Knox Tate, Don Tyndall, Kathy Tyndall, Trudy Thomson, Stella Waugh, Margaret B. White, Danielle Winslow, Michael Winslow, David Zoffer, Linda Zoffer, and Arbor Lea Landowners Association, Inc. v. CHATHAM COUNTY and the Chatham County Board of Commissioners appealed by Bonnie Terrell.

No. 319P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Robert E. Hornik, Jr., Chapel Hill, for Bonnie Terrell.

Paul Messick, Robert L. Gunn, for Chatham County.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th day of June 2006 by Petitioner (Bonnie Terrell) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."

Upon consideration of the alternative petition filed by Petitioner (Bonnie Terrell) on the 16th day of June 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
STATE v. TITUS.

No. COA05-1195.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
# Council Decision of 28 January 2013 appointing a Czech alternate member of the Committee of the Regions (2013/69/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 28 January 2013

# appointing a Czech alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

# (2013/69/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Czech Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr                              David RATH,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term                     of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:                  
          -  Mr Václav NOVOTNÝ, *radní hl. města Prahy*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Coveney                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
In the

United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

_______________

m 02-50887

Summary Calendar

_______________

ARLENE P. MATA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

SAN ANTONIO HOUSING AUTHORITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

m SA-01-CV-741

_________________________

December 20, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and 

CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

Arlene Mata sued her employer, the San

Antonio Housing Authority, for racialdiscrimination, alleging that it fired her because she is

Hispanic. The magistrate judge, acting as the

district court by consent, found no issues of

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has

determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circum-

(continued...)

(...continued)

stances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
2

material fact and granted summary judgment

to the Authority. Appearing pro se, Mata

appeals.

We have read the briefs and have consulted

pertinent portions of the record. On the basis

of applicable caselaw and the summary judgment record, we affirm, essentially for the reasons given by the magistrate judge in her comprehensive Memorandum of Decision and

Order dated and filed August 6, 2002, and

entered on August 7, 2002.

AFFIRMED.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5571 

To extend for 5 years the program relating to waiver of the foreign country 

residence requirement with respect to international medical graduates. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2008 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend for 5 years the program relating to waiver of 

the foreign country residence requirement with respect 

to international medical graduates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER PROGRAM. 

4 Section 220(c) of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Technical Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note) 

6 is amended by striking ‘‘June 1, 2008’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘June 1, 2013’’. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
STATE v. SHORT.

No. COA06-115.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from Rutherford (04CRS53801, 05CRS1331).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Curtis L. SANGSTER v. Boyd BENNETT, Director of Prisons and Directors Classification Committee for Lanesboro Correctional Institution.

No. 563P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 30, 2006.

Curtis L. Sangster, Pro Se.

*546Robert Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Bennett.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 26th day of October 2006 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Anson County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in Conference this the 30th day of October 2006."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathaniel Christopher, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 204]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered October 30, 2003, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), robbery in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Grosso, J), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony and physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the police lawfully stopped him for questioning *(see People v Hicks,*68 NY2d 234 [1986]; *People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210 [1976]). The complainant described the perpetrators as two black males, one tall and one short, wearing dark clothing. The defendant and his codefendant, who were seen walking together down the street, fit this description. They were observed within close proximity to the crime scene shortly after the crime occurred. Detaining him briefly to allow the police to bring the complainant over for a prompt on-the-scene viewing was a “minimally intrusive means *426of investigation likely to confirm or dispel suspicion quickly” *(People v Hicks, supra*at 242). Accordingly, suppression was properly denied *(see People v Hunt,*306 AD2d 497 [2003]; *People v Rowlett,*193 AD2d 768 [1993]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Adams, J.P., Krausman, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.