alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED 

 .U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

DECEMBER 19, 2006 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

Honorable Pasco Bowman, II, United States Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting *

by designation.

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-15242

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 02-00910-CV-ORL-28-JGG

GARY LEE WHEELER, 

Petitioner-Appellant, 

versus 

JAMES MCDONOUGH, 

CHARLIE CRIST, 

Respondents-Appellees. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(December 19, 2006)

Before TJOFLAT, HULL and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and a thorough review of the record, we conclude that
2

the district court judge erred by failing to recuse himself from Appellant Gary Lee

Wheeler’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceedings, where the judge also was the chief judge

of the state appellate court that affirmed, on direct appeal, the state convictions

now being challenged by Wheeler in his § 2254 petition. In doing so, we join the

other circuits which have held that 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) requires a district court

judge to recuse himself under similar circumstances. See Clemmons v. Wolfe, 377

F.3d 322 (3d Cir. 2004); Russell v. Lane, 890 F.2d 947 (7th Cir. 1989); Rice v.

McKenzie, 581 F.2d 1114 (4th Cir. 1978). 

Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s August 24, 2005 order denying

Wheeler’s motion to vacate, filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6); vacate the

district court’s November 14, 2002 order dismissing Wheeler’s § 2254 petition;

order that Wheeler’s § 2254 petition be reinstated nunc pro tunc as of the date of

its original filing; and direct that Wheeler’s § 2254 petition be assigned to a

different district court judge who has not participated in the review of Wheeler’s

convictions at issue while serving in the state courts.

REVERSED, VACATED, AND REMANDED TO REINSTATE PETITION.
SHUPING v. VALENTINE.

No. COA04-1322.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Stanly (02CVS1017)

Case reported without published opinion Dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I,
Robert C. Cantwell, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of B&G Foods, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
April 28, 2005

|/s/ROBERT C. CANTWELLRobert C. Cantwell
Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                              |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2




              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Chilco River  Holdings  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Winston
Yen, Chief Financial Officer and Principal  Financial and Accounting  Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:  November 14, 2006             By:  /s/ Winston Yen
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Winston Yen
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          (Principal Financial and Accounting
                                          Officer)
Second Amendment to AMD Executive Investment Account Plan



 Exhibit 10.64(b) 
  
 Second Amendment to the 
 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Executive Investment Account Plan 
  
 The Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Executive Investment Account Plan (Plan) shall be amended as follows: 
  
 Effective as of November 11, 2003, Appendix A to the Plan shall be amended
to add the following additional plans and percentage limitation. 
  

	 	“6.	Milestone Achievement Plan – 100%” 

  

			
	 ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC.
 ADMINISTRATIVE
COMMITTEE

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Kelly Smales


		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mike Woollems


		
	By:	 	 /s/ Reid Linney


		
	By:	 	  


		
	By:	 	  


		
	 	 	 Dated: May 25, 2004



  

 1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 20, 2015

NO. 03

- 15

- 00265

- CR

Robie Lee Lawhon, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUST ICES PEMBERTON AND F IELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the

parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s order

.

Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s order

. The appellant shall pay all costs relating

to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Cesario Urias, Cesario V. Urias, Joel Urias

and Sonia Urias

,

Appellant s

,

v.

Owl Springs North, LLC, Owl Springs

Holdings, LLC, and Barbara Prewit

,

Appellee s

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 2 1

- 00 063

- CV

Appeal from the

143 rd D istrict Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 19

- 11

- 23264

- CVR )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ant s ’ fourth m otion for extension of time within which to

file the brief until December 3 1 , 2021

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO F ILE THE APPELL ANTS ’ BR IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Eduardo N . Lerma

, the Appell ants ’ attorney, prepare

the Appell ants ’ brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 3 1 , 2021

.

I T IS SO ORDERED this 8 th day of December , 2021

.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
S.N.R. MANAGEMENT CORP. v. DANUBE PARTNERS 141, LLC.

No. COA05-677.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 20, 2006.

Certification Date July 10, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (04CVS5305).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2

TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the Company) for the quarter ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas E. Sloan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report is in full compliance with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Douglas E. Sloan   
|Douglas E. Sloan       
|Chief Financial Officer
|June 15, 2009
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                              |

----
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.32

April 8, 2005

Paul Grint, MD

Re: Illumina, Inc. Board Position

Dear Paul,

I am pleased to offer you an appointment to the Board of Directors of Illumina,
Inc. You will be appointed to serve in the class of Directors whose term expires
in 2007. At that time you will be subject to re-election on a three year term.
The effective date of your appointment will be Tuesday, April 12, 2005.

Your compensation as a Board Member will be as specified in Illumina's standard
policies for Director Compensation. Specifically, this consists of:

      -     $2,500 as a quarterly retainer.

      -     $2,000 additional compensation for attendance at each board meeting.

      -     $1,000 additional compensation for attendance at each committee
            meeting.

In addition, you will be awarded Illumina stock options according to the
following schedule:

      -     20,000 shares of Illumina stock will be awarded to you upon your
            election to the Board.

      -     Thereafter you will receive an additional 10,000 shares at each
            annual board meeting, provided that you have served on the Board for
            at least six calendar months prior to the date of the next annual
            stockholder meeting.

      -     These shares will vest over a four (4) year period on an annual
            vesting basis.

We look forward to working with you as a member of the Board in building a
preeminent life sciences company.

Sincerely,

Jay Flatley
President & CEO
Illumina, Inc.

Agreed and accepted.

_____________________________       ________________________________
        Name                                     Date
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 134 (Thursday, July 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42257]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15015]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Temporary 504 Express Loan Authority for Certified Development 
Companies Participating in the Accredited Lenders Program--Industries 
With a High Rate of Default

    The Economic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Nonprofits, and 
Venues Act (Pub. L. 116-260) (``Economic Aid Act'') temporarily 
provides increased authority to Certified Development Companies (CDCs) 
participating in the Small Business Administration's (SBA) Accredited 
Lenders Program (ALP) with respect to 504 loans that are not more than 
$500,000 and that are not made to a borrower in an industry with a high 
rate of default. The authority for ALP CDCs to make ALP Express Loans 
was implemented through an interim final rule published in the Federal 
Register on June 27, 2022 Vol. 97, No. 122 RIN 3245-AH74.
    Section 328(b) of the Economic Aid Act further requires that SBA 
annually identify the industries with a high rate of default. 
Accordingly, on an annual basis, SBA will list the industries that it 
has determined have a high rate of default in a notice published in the 
Federal Register, with the first list published after the publication 
of the interim final rule, and annually thereafter.
    To comply with this requirement, SBA defines ``industries with a 
high rate of default'' as an industry that for the past 5 fiscal years 
has 50 or more approvals/year and an annualized default rate of 5% or 
above. Using SBA's ALP Express risk identification methodology, SBA has 
determined there are no industries with a high rate of default in the 
504 program based on prior SBA 504 portfolio performance. SBA will 
review and update its analysis and publish an updated list annually 
through September 20, 2023.
    For SBA's analysis, the industries are analyzed by North American 
Industry Classification System (NAICS) Subsector Title and three-digit 
subsector code.

Isabella Casillas Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-15015 Filed 7-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 135 (Friday, July 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42465]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15113]



[[Page 42465]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) 
announces a Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting on ``Consumer 
Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) VI (U18)''. This 
SEP meeting will be closed to the public.

DATES: July 22, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, (Video Assisted 
Review), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Jenny Griffith, Committee Management 
Officer, Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority 
Populations, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, (AHRQ), 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, Telephone: (301) 427-1557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of 
experts in fields related to health care research who are invited by 
AHRQ, and agree to be available, to conduct on an as needed basis, 
scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ support. Individual members 
of the Panel do not attend regularly scheduled meetings and do not 
serve for fixed terms or a long period of time. Rather, they are asked 
to participate in particular review meetings which require their type 
of expertise.
    The SEP meeting referenced above will be closed to the public in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in 5 U.S.C. App. 2, section 
10(d), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). Grant applications 
for ``Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) 
VI (U18)'' are to be reviewed and discussed at this meeting. The grant 
applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade 
secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Agenda items for this meeting 
are subject to change as priorities dictate.

    Dated: July 11, 2022.
Marquita Cullom,
Associate Director.
[FR Doc. 2022-15113 Filed 7-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-P
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Post Office Box 12248 Austin, Texas 78711

Mr. Mike A. Hatchell Locke Lord LLP 100 Congress Avenue, Suite 300 Austin, TX 78701-2748 December 03, 2012 Mr. Ronald D. Stutes Potter Minton, P.C. HON College, Suite 50) Tyler, TX 75701 FILE COPY

(512)463-1312
RLFD INCOURT CFAPPEALS

CATHY S. LUSK, CLtRK RE: Case Number: 11-0161 

### CourtofAppeals Number: 12-09-00189-CV Trial Court Number: 96-123 Style: LARRY T. LONG, L. ALLAN LONG, AND B. VIRGINIA LONG, IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCE ALLAN LONG TRUST, THE CHARLES EDWARD LONG TRUST, THE LARRY THOMAS LONG TRUST AND THE JOHN STEPHEN LONG TRUST D/B/A THE LONG TRUSTS v. CASTLE TEXAS PRODUCTION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Dear Counsel: 

### Today the Supreme Court ofTexas issued the enclosed order in the above-referenced

cause.

cc: Jean Hodges Cathy S. Lusk Sincerely, 

# ^V. VW>v5S^. Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk by Claudia Jenks, ChiefDeputy ClerkNO. 11-0161 FILE COPY FL FDIN COURTCFAPPEALS 

## E SUPREME COURT OF liEX&S D&C 4 2012 

# L Larry T. Long, L. Allan Long, And B. Virginia Long, In TheirCapacities As

Trustees OfThe Lawrence AllanLong Trust, The Charles Edward Long 

### Trust, The Larry Thomas Long TrustAndTheJohn StephenLong Trust D/b/aThe Long Trusts, Petitioners
V. CASTLETEXAS PRODUCTIONLIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review
ORDER 

### 1. Pursuant to Castle Texas Production LimitedPartnership's Notice to Petitioners of Removal to Federal Court, filed on November 29, 2012, this case is ABATED effective immediately. 2. This case is abated pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 8.2 until further order ofthis Court and is removed from the Court's active docket, subject to reinstatement upon proper motion. Tex. 

### R. App. P. 8.3. All motions and other documents pending or filed are abated subject to being reurged in the event the case is reinstated. TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2 and 8.3. The Court directs the 

### parties to notify the Court ofall events affecting the status ofthis case, and, in any event, to file a status report by February 1,2013. . 

### Done at the City ofAustin, this 3rd ofDecember, 2012. 

# ^. VV»^vF5^_ Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk Supreme Court ofTexas 

### By ClaudiaJenks, ChiefDeputy Clerk
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 5, 2011

0405 

# Order

April 5, 2011

141174

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141174 COA: 296850 Muskegon CC: 09-057368-FH 09-057533-FH JAMES EARL McCLENDON, III, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of October 29, 2010, this case was held in abeyance for People v Mungo (Docket No. 141160) and People v Short (Docket No. 141822). On the Court’s own motion, we VACATE our abeyance order of October 29, 2010. The application for leave to appeal the April 19 , 2010 order of the Court of App eals is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Davis v United States , cert gtd ___ US ___; 131 S Ct 502; 178 L Ed 2d 368 (2010), is pending before th e United States Supreme Court and the decision in that case may re solve an issue raised in the pr esent application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in

Davis

.

Z AHRA , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00031-CR

ERIC SHANE HARRIS

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

443rd District Court of Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 44075CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 10, 2021
Peter WENDT v. E. Norris TOLSON, dba North Carolina Secretary of Revenue.

No. 544P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Peter Wendt, Pro Se.

Michael D. Youth, Assistant Attorney General, for E. Norris Tolson.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Notice of Appeal App. Rule 14(b)(2) from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Petitioner on the 21st day of September 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the
Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



/s/ Richard L. PetekaName: Richard L. PetekaDate: August 7, 2006