41590 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

eastern daylight time, October 1, 2016, 

certain transactions and activities 

otherwise prohibited pursuant to E.O. 

13685, that are ordinarily incident and 

necessary to divest or transfer holdings 

in PJSC Mostotrest, a person blocked 

pursuant to E.O. 13685, to a non-U.S. 

person. 

The text of GLs 2 and 10 is provided 

below. 

OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS 

CONTROL 

Executive Order 13662 of March 20, 

2014 

Blocking Property of Additional 

Persons Contributing to the Situation in 

Ukraine 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 2 

Authorizing Certain Activities 

Prohibited by Directive 4 Under 

Executive Order 13662 Necessary To 

Wind Down Operations 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph 

(b) of this general license, all activities 

prohibited by Directive 4 under 

Executive Order 13662 of March 20, 

2014, that are ordinarily incident and 

necessary to the wind down of 

operations, contracts, or other 

agreements involving persons 

determined to be subject to Directive 4 

under Executive Order 13662 and that 

were in effect prior to September 12, 

2014, are authorized through 12:01 a.m. 

eastern daylight time, September 26, 

2014. 

(b) This general license does not 

authorize any new provision, 

exportation, or reexportation of goods, 

services (except for financial services), 

or technology except as needed to cease 

operations involving projects covered by 

Directive 4 under Executive Order 

13662. This general license does not 

authorize any transactions or dealings 

otherwise prohibited by any other 

Directive under Executive Order 13662 

or any part of 31 CFR chapter V. 

(c) U.S. persons participating in 

transactions authorized by this general 

license are required, within 10 business 

days after the wind-down activities 

conclude, to file a detailed report, 

including the parties involved, the type 

and scope of activities conducted, and 

the dates of the activities, with the 

Office of Foreign Assets Control, 

Licensing Division, U.S. Department of 

the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW, Annex, Washington, DC 

20220. 

John E. Smith, 

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets 

Control. 

Dated: September 12, 2014. 

OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS 

CONTROL 

Executive Order 13685 of December 19, 

2014 

Blocking Property of Certain Persons 

and Prohibiting Certain Transactions 

With Respect to the Crimea Region of 

Ukraine 

GENERAL LICENSE NO. 10 

Authorizing Certain Transactions 

Otherwise Prohibited by Executive 

Order 13685 

Necessary To Divest or Transfer 

Holdings in Certain Blocked Entities 

(a) Except as provided in paragraph 

(c) of this general license, all 

transactions and activities otherwise 

prohibited pursuant to Executive Order 

(E.O.) 13685 of December 19, 2014 

(‘‘Blocking Property of Certain Persons 

and Prohibiting Certain Transactions 

With Respect to the Crimea Region of 

Ukraine’’) that are ordinarily incident 

and necessary to divest or transfer to a 

non-U.S. person holdings in PJSC 

Mostotrest are authorized through 12:01 

a.m. eastern daylight time, October 1, 

2016. 

(b) The transactions and activities 

authorized in paragraph (a) include 

facilitating, clearing, and settling 

transactions to divest or transfer to a 

non-U.S. person holdings in PJSC 

Mostotrest, including on behalf of nonU.S. persons. 

(c) This general license does not 

authorize: 

(1) U.S. persons to sell holdings to, 

purchase or invest in holdings of, or 

facilitate non-U.S. person transactions 

with, any entity whose property and 

interests in property are blocked 

pursuant to E.O. 13685, including PJSC 

Mostotrest, or to engage in any 

transactions or activities otherwise 

prohibited by any other Executive order, 

or any part of 31 CFR chapter V; or 

(2) The unblocking of any property 

blocked pursuant to E.O. 13685, any 

other Executive order, or any part of 31 

CFR chapter V, except as authorized by 

paragraph (a). 

(d) U.S. and non-U.S. persons 

divesting or transferring holdings in 

PJSC Mostotrest authorized by this 

general license are required, within 10 

business days after the divestment 

activities conclude, to file a detailed 

report, including the names and 

addresses of parties involved, the type 

and scope of activities conducted, and 

the dates on which the activities 

occurred, with the Office of Foreign 

Assets Control, Sanctions Compliance & 

Evaluation Division, U.S. Department of 

the Treasury, 1500 Pennsylvania 

Avenue NW, Freedman’s Bank Building, 

Washington, DC 20220, or via email to 

OFACReport@treasury.gov. 

Andrea Gacki, 

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets 

Control. 

Dated: August 31, 2016. 

Andrea M. Gacki, 

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14914 Filed 7–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2022–0594] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Military Exercise, Sinclair 

Inlet, Bremerton, WA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a temporary safety zones for 

navigable waters within a 500 yard 

radius of a position located in Sinclair 

Inlet, Bremerton, WA. The safety zone is 

needed to protect personnel, vessels, 

and the marine environment from 

potential hazards created by a military 

exercise involving helocast operations. 

Entry of vessels or persons into this 

zone is prohibited unless specifically 

authorized by the Captain of the Port 

Puget Sound. 

DATES: This rule is effective from 10:30 

a.m. on August 4, 2022 through 11:30 

a.m. on August 5, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to https://

www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2022– 

0594 in the search box and click 

‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type 

column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related 

Material.’’ 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email Chief Warrant Officer, William 

Martinez, Sector Puget Sound 

Waterways Management Division, U.S. 

Coast Guard; telephone 206–217–6048, 

email SectorPugetSoundWWM@

uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

COTP Captain of the Port Puget Sound 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 41591 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 

II. Background Information and 

Regulatory History 

The Coast Guard is issuing this 

temporary rule without prior notice and 

opportunity to comment pursuant to 

authority under section 4(a) of the 

Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 

U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision 

authorizes an agency to issue a rule 

without prior notice and opportunity to 

comment when the agency for good 

cause finds that those procedures are 

‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that 

good cause exists for not publishing a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

with respect to this rule because it is 

impracticable. The Coast Guard was 

notified of the military exercise on July 

5, 2022, and due to the evolving 

dynamic nature of the military helocast 

exercise it was determined on July 5, 

2022 that immediate action is needed to 

respond to the potential safety hazards 

associated with the exercise. The 

Captain of the Port Puget Sound (COTP) 

determined this regulation is necessary 

to ensure the safety of personnel, 

vessels, and the marine environment. 

The Coast Guard lacks sufficient time to 

request public comments and then 

consider those comments before issuing 

the rule. 

Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 

Guard finds that good cause exists for 

making this rule effective less than 30 

days after publication in the Federal 

Register. Delaying the effective date of 

this rule would be impracticable 

because this regulation is needed to 

respond to the potential safety hazards 

associated with this military exercise. 

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule 

The Coast Guard is issuing this rule 

under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034 

(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP 

has determined that potential hazards 

associated with the military helocast 

exercise on August 4, 2022 and August 

5, 2022, will be a safety concern for 

anyone within a 500-yard radius of 

position 47°32′51.5′′ N 122°38′37′′ W 

and the exercise participants. This rule 

is needed to protect personnel, vessels, 

and the marine environment in the 

navigable waters within the safety zone. 

IV. Discussion of the Rule 

This rule establishes a safety zone 

from 10:30 until 11:30 a.m. on August 

4, 2022 and 10:30 until 11:00 a.m. on 

August 5, 2022. The safety zone will 

cover all navigable waters within a 500 

yard radius of position 47°32′51.5′′ N 

122°38′37′′ W in Sinclair Inlet. This 

helocast exercise involves helicopters 

flying at a low altitude above the water 

and launching boats and personnel from 

the aircraft. The duration of the zone is 

intended to protect personnel, vessels, 

and the marine environment in these 

navigable waters while the exercise is 

ongoing. No vessel or person will be 

permitted to enter the safety zone 

without obtaining permission from the 

COTP or a designated representative. 

V. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

Executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on a number of these statutes and 

Executive orders, and we discuss First 

Amendment rights of protestors. 

A. Regulatory Planning and Review 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 

direct agencies to assess the costs and 

benefits of available regulatory 

alternatives and, if regulation is 

necessary, to select regulatory 

approaches that maximize net benefits. 

This rule has not been designated a 

‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under 

Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, 

this rule has not been reviewed by the 

Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB). 

This regulatory action determination 

is based on size, location, and duration 

of the safety zone. Vessel traffic will be 

able to safely transit around this safety 

zone which would impact a small 

designated area of the Puget Sound for 

1 hour on two days. The Coast Guard 

will transmit a Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners via VHF–FM marine channel 

16 regarding the safety zone 

enforcement and publish in the Local 

Notice to Mariners information about 

details of the safety zone. In addition, 

the rule allows mariners to seek 

permission to enter the zone. To seek 

permission to enter, contact the COTP 

or the COTP’s representative by VHF 

Channel 16. Those in the safety zone 

must comply with all lawful orders or 

directions given to them by the COTP or 

the COTP’s designated representative. 

B. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 

1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires Federal agencies to consider 

the potential impact of regulations on 

small entities during rulemaking. The 

term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 

605(b) that this rule will not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

While some owners or operators of 

vessels intending to transit the safety 

zone may be small entities, for the 

reasons stated in section V.A above, this 

rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on any vessel owner 

or operator. 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this rule. If the rule 

would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

Small businesses may send comments 

on the actions of Federal employees 

who enforce, or otherwise determine 

compliance with, Federal regulations to 

the Small Business and Agriculture 

Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman 

and the Regional Small Business 

Regulatory Fairness Boards. The 

Ombudsman evaluates these actions 

annually and rates each agency’s 

responsiveness to small business. If you 

wish to comment on actions by 

employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 

888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The 

Coast Guard will not retaliate against 

small entities that question or complain 

about this rule or any policy or action 

of the Coast Guard. 

C. Collection of Information 

This rule will not call for a new 

collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520). 

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal 

Governments 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the National Government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this rule under that Order and 

have determined that it is consistent 

with the fundamental federalism 

principles and preemption requirements 

described in Executive Order 13132. 

Also, this rule does not have tribal 

implications under Executive Order 

13175, Consultation and Coordination 

with Indian Tribal Governments, 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1
41592 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2022 / Rules and Regulations 

because it does not have a substantial 

direct effect on one or more Indian 

tribes, on the relationship between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

Government and Indian tribes. 

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this rule 

will not result in such an expenditure, 

we do discuss the effects of this rule 

elsewhere in this preamble. 

F. Environment 

We have analyzed this rule under 

Department of Homeland Security 

Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated 

implementing instructions, and 

Environmental Planning COMDTINST 

5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 

U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have 

determined that this action is one of a 

category of actions that do not 

individually or cumulatively have a 

significant effect on the human 

environment. This rule involves a 

stationary safety zone lasting only 1 

hour per day that will prohibit entry 

within a 500 yard radius of position 

47°32′51.5′′ N 122°38′37′′ W in Sinclair 

Inlet. It is categorically excluded from 

further review under paragraph L60(a) 

of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS 

Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01, 

Rev. 1. 

G. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to call or email the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Security measures, 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 

CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 

1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; 

Department of Homeland Security Delegation 

No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.2. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T13–0594 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T13–0594 Safety Zone; Military 

Exercise, Sinclair Inlet, Bremerton, WA. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

safety zone: all navigable waters within 

a 500 yard radius of position 47°32′51.5′′ 

N 122°38′37′′ W in Sinclair Inlet. These 

coordinates are based 1984 World 

Geodetic System (WGS 84). 

(b) Definitions. As used in this 

section, a designated representative 

means a Coast Guard Patrol 

Commander, including a Coast Guard 

coxswain, petty officer, or other officer 

operating a Coast Guard vessel and a 

Federal, State, and local officer 

designated by or assisting the Captain of 

the Port Puget Sound (COTP) in the 

enforcement of the safety zone. 

(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general 

safety zone regulations in subpart C of 

this part, you may not enter the safety 

zone described in paragraph (a) of this 

section unless authorized by the COTP 

or the COTP’s designated representative. 

(2) To seek permission to enter, 

contact the COTP or the COTP’s 

representative by VHF Channel 16. 

Those in the safety zone must comply 

with all lawful orders or directions 

given to them by the COTP or the 

COTP’s designated representative. 

(d) Enforcement period. This section 

will be enforced from 10:30 until 11:30 

a.m. on August 4, 2022 and 10:30 until 

11:30 a.m. on August 5, 2022. 

Dated: July 7, 2022. 

P.M. Hilbert, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port Puget Sound. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14895 Filed 7–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2022–0568] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Gulf Intracoastal 

Waterway, Corpus Christi, TX 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Temporary final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is 

establishing a temporary moving safety 

zone for the navigable waters of the Gulf 

Intracoastal Water (GIWW) within 500 

yards of the barge CBC MIAMI and 

barge JULIUS as they transport 

oversized equipment from State Service, 

Ingleside, TX to the Corpus Christi Ship 

Channel. The safety zone is needed to 

protect personnel, vessels, and the 

marine environment from potential 

hazards created by transport of 

oversized equipment. Entry of vessels or 

persons into this zone is prohibited 

unless specifically authorized by the 

Captain of the Port Sector Corpus 

Christi or a designated representative. 

DATES: This rule is effective without 

actual notice from July 13, 2022 through 

July 14, 2022. For the purposes of 

enforcement, actual notice will be used 

from July 10, 2022, until July 13, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: To view documents 

mentioned in this preamble as being 

available in the docket, go to https://

www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2022– 

0568 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rule. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, call or 

email Lieutenant Commander Anthony 

Garofalo, Sector Corpus Christi 

Waterways Management Division, U.S. 

Coast Guard; telephone 361–939–5130, 

email Anthony.M.Garofalo@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking 

§ Section 

U.S.C. United States Code 

II. Background Information and 

Regulatory History 

The Coast Guard is issuing this 

temporary rule without prior notice and 

opportunity to comment pursuant to 

authority under section 4(a) of the 

Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 

U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision 

authorizes an agency to issue a rule 

without prior notice and opportunity to 

comment when the agency for good 

cause finds that those procedures are 

‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary 

to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 

553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that 

good cause exists for not publishing a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

with respect to this rule because it is 

impracticable. We must establish this 

safety zone immediately to protect 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with RULES1