alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            73949
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,868,809
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,942,758)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        

</TABLE>
IN RE M.C.

No. COA06-158.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Cumberland (02J264, 02J267)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 10.17


 


ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT


 


THIS ASSIGNMENT AND
ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT (“Assignment and Assumption Agreement”) is effective December 18, 2015 (the “Effective
Date”), by and between Fortress Biotech, Inc. (“Fortress”), a Delaware corporation, and Checkpoint
Therapeutics, Inc. (“Checkpoint”), a Delaware corporation.


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Fortress
and Cephalon, Inc. (“Cephalon”) are parties to that certain License Agreement, dated December 18, 2015 (the
“License Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, pursuant
to Section 11.2 of the License Agreement, Fortress may assign the License Agreement to an Affiliate (as defined in the License
Agreement) of Fortress without Cephalon’s prior written consent;


 


WHEREAS, Checkpoint
is an Affiliate of Fortress; and


 


WHEREAS; Fortress
wishes to assign the License Agreement to Checkpoint and, in connection therewith, Checkpoint has agreed to accept such assignment
and assume the obligations thereunder.


 


AGREEMENTS


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed that:


 


1.          Assignment.
Fortress hereby sells, assigns, conveys, transfers and delivers to Checkpoint all of Fortress’ right, title, and interest
in and to the License Agreement.


 


2.          Assumption.
Checkpoint hereby accepts the foregoing assignment, and in connection therewith, Checkpoint hereby agrees to assume all of Fortress’
obligations under the License Agreement, whether arising before, at or after the Effective Date.


 


3.          Effective
Time. The effective time of this Assignment and Assumption Agreement is 11:59pm EST on the date hereof.


 


4.          Counterparts;
Electronic Delivery. This Assignment and Assumption Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same
effect as if each of the parties hereto had signed the same document. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute
one Assignment and Assumption Agreement. This Assignment and Assumption Agreement, to the extent signed and delivered by means
of facsimile machine or via e-mail, shall be treated in all manner and respects as an original agreement or instrument and shall
be considered to have the same binding legal effect as if it were the original signed version thereof delivered in person.


 




     


     


    

  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Assignment and Assumption Agreement as of the date first above written.


 


	FORTRESS BIOTECH, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Lindsay Rosenwald	 
	 	 	 
	Name:	Lindsay Rosenwald	 
	 	 	 
	Title:	CEO	 
	 	 	 
	CHECKPOINT THERAPEUTICS, INC.	 
	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ James Oliviero	 
	 	 	 
	Name:	James Oliviero	 
	 	 	 
	Title:	President & CEO
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 574 

To ensure the safety of residents and visitors to Lake Barkley, Kentucky, 

and to improve recreation, navigation, and the economic vitality of the 

lake’s region, the Army Corps of Engineers, together with any other 

Federal agency that has the authority to change the pool elevation 

of such lake, shall establish a pilot program to maintain the pool elevation 

of such lake at 359 feet until after the first Monday in September. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2007 

Mr. WHITFIELD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To ensure the safety of residents and visitors to Lake Barkley, Kentucky, and to improve recreation, navigation, 

and the economic vitality of the lake’s region, the Army 

Corps of Engineers, together with any other Federal 

agency that has the authority to change the pool elevation of such lake, shall establish a pilot program to 

maintain the pool elevation of such lake at 359 feet 

until after the first Monday in September. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 574 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lake Barkley Water 

3 Level Improvement Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. SAFETY FOR LAKE BARKLEY, KENTUCKY. 

5 (a) PILOT PROGRAM.—Notwithstanding any other 

6 provision of Federal law, beginning on July 1, 2007, the 

7 Army Corps of Engineers, together with any other Federal 

8 agency that has the authority to change the pool elevation 

9 of Lake Berkley, Kentucky, shall establish and conduct 

10 a pilot program that, under normal weather conditions, 

11 extends the summer pool elevation of 359 feet on such 

12 lake from the current draw down date of July 1 until after 

13 the first Monday in September. 

14 (b) PILOT PROGRAM DURATION.—Except as pro15 vided in subsection (d), the pilot program shall terminate 

16 on the first Monday in September 2 years after the pilot 

17 program begins. 

18 (c) EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS.—Not 

19 later than 60 days after the first Monday in September 

20 2 years after the pilot program begins, the Chief of Engi21 neers of the Army Corps of Engineers shall evaluate the 

22 effectiveness of extending the pool elevation on Lake Bar23 kley, Kentucky, under subsection (a) and report to the ap24 propriate committees of Congress their findings, including 

25 any recommendations, regarding the extension of such 

26 lake elevation. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 574 IH

1 (d) CONTINUATION.—If the Army Corps of Engi2 neers determines that the pilot program under this section 

3 is effective, the Corps shall continue the summer elevation 

4 of 359 feet on Lake Barkley, Kentucky, through the first 

5 Monday in September each year. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Brian E. PELTIER, Employee, Plaintiff v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Employer and CIGNA, Carrier, Defendants.

No. 636P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

Brian E. Peltier, Pro Se.

Erin D. Eveson, Bettina Mumme, Raleigh, for Greyhound Lines, Inc.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 15th day of November 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON recused.
STATE v. BLAKENEY.

No. COA05-1620.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 15, 2006.

Certification Date September 5, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS243297).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MEGHAN FLYNN, GINA SOSCIA, JAMES 

FISHWICK, GLENN JACOBS, GLENN 

KASPER AND ALISON L. HIGGINS,

Petitioners

v.

SUNOCO PIPELINE L.P.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 249 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

                              Consent of KPMG LLP

The Board of Directors
The Metzler Group, Inc.

  We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-30267) on Form S-8 of The Metzler Group, Inc. of our reports dated
February 10, 1999, except for Note 13 which is as of January 21, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of The Metzler Group, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1998, and the related
schedule, which reports appear in the December 31, 1998, annual report on Form
10-K/A2 of The Metzler Group, Inc.

Chicago, Illinois
January 23, 2000
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





Pursuant
      to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies
      that (i) the Quarterly Report of KH Funding Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter
      ended June 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of KH Funding Company.








Date:
                August 13, 2008
            /s/
                Robert L. HarrisRobert
                L. HarrisChief
                Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
                Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________ _____________
No. 1D18-2150

________________ _____________
D EMARCUS R AY L EDENT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

________________ _____________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Jan Shackelford, Judge.

July 9, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , B.L. T HOMAS , and R OBERTS , JJ., concur.

________________ _____________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fl a. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

________________ _____________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, an d Maria Ines Suber, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee; Jame s R. Barnes of the Law Office of James R. Barnes, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Gene ral, and Amanda D. Stokes, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5  
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          14,367
<SECURITIES>                                    14,265
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,858
<ALLOWANCES>                                       377
<INVENTORY>                                     11,946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,492
<PP&E>                                          38,162
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,732
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,465
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,355
<SALES>                                         90,355
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                41,799
<CGS>                                           23,150
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,532<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,718
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,312
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,406
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,406
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<FN>
<F1>RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
<F2>PROVISION FOR BAD DEBT
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. JONES.

No. COA05-1566.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 15, 2006.

Certification Date September 5, 2006.

Appeal from Pitt (03CRS64740, 03CRS64741).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. William Earl BRADLEY.

No. 21P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 13, 2006.

Constance E. Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Bradley.

Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th day of January 2006 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 13th day of January 2006."
Amendment to Administrative Services Agreement effective April 1, 2005



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 AMENDMENT TO ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT 
  
 This Amendment to Administrative Services Agreement (the “Amendment”) is effective as of April 1, 2005 by and
between Maryland Radiation Therapy Management Services, Inc., a Maryland corporation, (“MRTMS”) and Katin Radiation Therapy, P.A., a Maryland professional corporation (the “P.A.”). 
  
 RECITALS 
  
 A. MRTMS and the P.A. are parties to that certain Administrative Services Agreement dated as of October 31, 1998 (as
amended, the “Original Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Original Agreement. 
  
 B. MRTMS and the P.A. desire to amend the Original Agreement to reflect certain modifications to the parties, terms and
provisions of the Original Agreement. 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, for and
in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties agree as follows: 
  
 1. Each of MRTMS and the P.A. agree and acknowledge that effective April 1, 2005, MRTMS ceased providing management services to the P.A. in connection with the radiation therapy facility located at 314 Franklin
Avenue, Berlin, Maryland. Each of MRTMS and the P.A. further agree and acknowledge that MRTMS shall, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Original Agreement, continue to provide management services to the P.A. in connection with the
P.A.’s provision of professional radiation therapy services at other Maryland and Delaware facilities, currently Salisbury, Maryland and Seaford, Delaware. 
  

2. Each of MRTMS and the P.A. agree and acknowledge that from and after the date hereof, Section 3.1 of the Original Agreement shall read as follows:

  
 “3.1 Service Fee. For the services to be provided
hereunder by MRTMS, the P.A. shall pay to MRTMS a monthly Service Fee of Nine Thousand Five Hundred and Eighty-Five Dollars ($9,585). The parties agree that the Service Fee represents the fair market value of the services provided by MRTMS hereunder
and that the parties shall meet annually to reevaluate the value of services provided by MRTMS and shall establish the fair market value thereof for purposes of this Section 3.1.” 
  
 3. No Other Amendments. The provisions of this Amendment shall not affect, amend, modify or change any other
provisions of the Original Agreement other than as explicitly set forth herein. The terms of the Original Agreement not affected, modified or changed by virtue of this Amendment shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each
of which shall be considered an original and all of which taken together shall constitute a single instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.

  

					
	MARYLAND RADIATION THERAPY
MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ David M. Koeninger


	Name: David M. Koeninger
	Title: Vice President
	
	KATIN RADIATION THERAPY, P.A.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael J. Katin, M.D.


	Name: Michael J. Katin, M.D.
	Title: President


  

 2
PARKER & ORLEANS HOMEBUILDERS, INC. v. WHITSON.

No. COA06-146.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05CVS9146).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Intellisync Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-K/A for the year ending July 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Woodson Hobbs, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

a)                The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

b)               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 23,  2005           |       |
|------------------------------------------|------------|
|                                     |       |
| /s/  WOODSON HOBBS                       |       |
| **Woodson  Hobbs**                       | ** ** |
| *President  and Chief Executive Officer* | * *   |

 

----
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-21-00230-CV 

 

JUSTIN WAYNE LAPREE, APPELLANT 

V. 

BRINK BENNETT FLAHERTY GOLDEN, PLLC 

AND RHONDA H. BRINK, APPELLEES 

 

On Appeal from the 200th District Court 

 Travis County, Texas 

Trial Court No. D-1-GN-19-007307, Honorable Dustin Howell, Presiding 

August 3, 2022 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant, Justin Wayne LaPree, appeals from the trial court’s final judgment.

1

 

Now pending before this Court is LaPree’s unopposed motion seeking voluntary dismissal 

of the appeal. The Court finds that the motion to dismiss complies with the requirements 

of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will not prevent 

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
2

any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no decision of 

the Court has been delivered to date, we grant the motion. The appeal is dismissed. 

Because the motion does not reflect an agreement of the parties concerning the payment 

of costs, costs will be taxed against LaPree. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). No motion for 

rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. 

Per Curiam
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
DATA FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT
EARNINGS PER SHARE.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,802
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,805
<ALLOWANCES>                                        84
<INVENTORY>                                        687
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,849
<PP&E>                                           9,228
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,597
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,653
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,500
<COMMON>                                            52
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,653
<SALES>                                         13,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,187
<CGS>                                            8,103
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (425)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,655)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        48
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,703)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,703)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.12)
        

</TABLE>