alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 125 (Thursday, June 30, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 39084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14010]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filing

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-991-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Compliance filing: Notice Regarding Non-Certificated 
Gathering Facilities (M-73 System) to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 6/23/22.
    Accession Number: 20220623-5143.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/5/22.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 24, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-14010 Filed 6-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
STATE v. DOCKERY.

No. COA05-1471.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 19, 2006

Certification Date October 9, 2006.

Appeal from Madison (04CRS50417)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Monster Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew J. McKelvey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | By: |  | /s/ANDREW J. MCKELVEYAndrew J. McKelvey
Chief Executive Officer
March 4, 2005 |  | 
| |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Monster Worldwide, Inc. and will be retained by Monster Worldwide, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
In re C.D.A.W.

No. 110A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 23, 2006.

Gary C. Rhodes, Salisbury, for Angela Wright Eagle.

James A. Dickens, Assistant Guilford County Attorney, for Guilford County DSS.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of May 2006 by Guardian Ad Litem for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Guardian Ad Litem shall have up to and including the 10th day of July 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of May 2006."
DUFFIELD v. DAVIS.

No. COA05-1592.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Rutherford (05CVS1249, 05CVS5197)

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
Richard HARRISON and Kathy Harrison v. CITY OF SANFORD, A municipal corporation.

No. 251P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2006.

Norwood P. Blanchard, III, Wilmington, for City of Sanford.

Thomas M. VanCamp, Pinehurst, for Harrison.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 627 S.E.2d 672.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of May 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of December 2006."
Order entered August 16, 2018 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00930-CV 

IN RE JOSEPH STROFFOLINO, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 219th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 219-00125-2018 

ORDER 

Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s August 15, 2018 “petition 

for writ of habeas corpus and dissolution of warrant.” 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

 JUSTICE
STATE v. GLENN.

No. COA05-1014.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 2, 2006.

Certification Date May 22, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS55492, 04CRS15563).

Case without published opinion. No error.
Compensation Information for the Company's  named executive officers.



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  

							
	 Named Executive Officer

	  	2006 Fiscal Year
Base Salary (1)

	  	2005 Fiscal Year
Bonus (2)


	 Leonard Bell, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
	  	$	490,000	  	$	275,000
			
	 David W. Keiser
President and Chief Operating Officer
	  	$	334,400	  	$	140,000
			
	 Stephen P. Squinto, Ph.D.
Executive Vice President and Head of Research
	  	$	290,510	  	$	107,000
			
	 Christopher Mojcik, M.D., Ph.D.
Senior Vice President, Clinical Development
	  	$	281,105	  	$	92,000
			
	 Thomas I.H. Dubin, J.D.
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
	  	$	265,360	  	$	89,000



	(1)	Effective August 1, 2005. 


	(2)	Paid on August 5, 2005.
PATEL v. STANLEY WORKS CUSTOMER SUPPORT.

No. COA05-462.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 18, 2006.

Certification Date August 7, 2006.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #876636).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.38

              Summary of 2005 Named Executive Officer Compensation

     The table below shows the current annual salary and 2005 target bonus under
the Tenneco Automotive Value Added Incentive Plan for the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and each of the next four most highly compensated officers of
the Company other than the Chief Executive Officer (based on salary and bonus
received during 2004). The current salary for each of the individuals named
below was effective as of July 1, 2005.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Name                    Current Salary                2005 Target Bonus
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                              <C>                           <C>
Mark P. Frissora                    $825,586                    One Times Salary
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy R. Donovan                  $424,794                        $273,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hari N. Nair                        $400,084                        $273,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth R. Trammell                 $346,722                        $223,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard P. Schneider                $371,082                        $161,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ANA ORTEGA

, * No. 12

- 703 V

* Special Master Christian J. Moran

Petitioner, *

*

v. * Filed: October 4, 2013

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Entitlement; influenza (flu) vaccine;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * shoulder injury related to vaccine

* administration (SIRVA)

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ronald C. Homer , Conway, Homer & Chin

- Caplan, P.C., Boston, MA, for petitioner

Tara J. Kilfoyle , United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for r espondent.

UNPUBLISHED RULING ON ENTITLEMENT *

On October 17, 2012, Ana Ortega filed a petition for compensation , alleging that s he

suffered a shoulder injury caused by a n influenza (flu) vaccine, which s he received on November

17, 2011

. Petitioner seek s compensation pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation

Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 10 et seq. (2006).

In her Rule 4 (c) report, respondent stated her opinion that this case is appropriate for

compensation under the terms of the Act. Resp’t Rep., filed Sept. 24, 2013, at 2. Respondent

stated further that “petitioner’s claim sa tisfies the Althen requirements and that her SIRVA was

caused

- in

- fact by the influenza vaccination she received on November 17, 2011.” Id . at 5

(referencing Althen v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs ., 418 F.3d 1274, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 2005)).

Special masters may determine whether a petitioner is entitled to compensation based

upon the record. A hearing is not required. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 13; Vaccine Rule 8(d). B ased

upon a review of the record as a whole, the undersigned finds that pe titioner ha s established that

she is entitled to compensation. The parties are directed to begin the process of determining the

amount of compensation to which the petitioner is entitled.

* T he E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17,

2002), requires that the Court post this ruling on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the

parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical infor mation or other

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa

- 12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special

master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Tucker McCarthy, at (202) 357

- 6392

.

IT I S SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master
STATE v. HOWARD.

No. COA05-835.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Buncombe (01CRS64343, 01CRS64399, 02CRS12735).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN RE N.G.

COA06-101.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Transylvania (04J41 04J42, 04J43).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
#### In the Matter of Manuel Rivera, Petitioner, v Gary Greene, as Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[800 NYS2d 791]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Washington County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Following a tier II disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of obstructing the view into his cell in violation of a prison disciplinary rule. That determination was upheld on administrative appeal, prompting petitioner to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge it.

*1168Inasmuch as substantial evidence was presented at the disciplinary hearing in the form of the misbehavior report and petitioner’s testimony, during which he conceded that he had hung a sheet from the bars of his cell as charged in the misbehavior report, we find no basis upon which to disturb the administrative determination *(see Matter of Abdul-Malik v Keesler,*288 AD2d 738, 738-739 [2001]; *Matter of O’Donnell v Senkowski,*251 AD2d 717, 718 [1998]). We have considered petitioner’s remaining contentions—to the extent they were preserved for appellate review—and find them to be unpersuasive.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
IN RE B.R.C.

No. COA04-481.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from Burke (03J37).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report on
Form 10-K/A of Marine Exploration, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2008:

          (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Marine Exploration, Inc.




/s/ Miguel Thomas Gonzalez
--------------------------
Miguel Thomas Gonzalez
Chief Executive Officer
October 1, 2008


 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Marine Exploration, Inc. and
will be retained by Marine Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.


<PAGE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.01



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of

ERF Wireless, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 of our report dated April 11, 2005, relating to the consolidated
financial statement schedules, which appears in this Form 10-KSB/A.

We consent to all references to our firm in this Form 10-KSB/A.



/s/ Lopez, Blevins, Bork & Associates, LLP
------------------------------------------
Lopez, Blevins, Bork & Associates, LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Houston, Texas

August 26, 2005
JONES v. CITY OF DURHAM.

No. 137A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 17, 2006.

Stewart W. Fisher, Carlos E. Mahoney, William S. Mills, Durham, for Linda Jones.

Mark A. Davis, Raleigh, for County Commissioners, et al.

Bradley N. Schultz, T. Marie Mobley, Smithfield, for Academy of Trial Lawyers.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of April 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (City of Durham, et al.) shall have up to and including the 8th day of May 2006 to file and serve *834his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of April 2006."
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a), AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Principal Financial Officer



I, Henry A. Miller, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Idaho General Mines, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Dated: May 16, 2006



By:          /s/    Henry A. Miller

Name:

Henry A. Miller

Title:

Chief Financial Officer









1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                                  36
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          322
<ALLOWANCES>                                            40
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       361
<PP&E>                                                 981
<DEPRECIATION>                                         535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,503
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                             15
<COMMON>                                                38
<OTHER-SE>                                         (3,771)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           885
<SALES>                                              1,493
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,493
<CGS>                                                1,233
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5,165
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     2,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (6,069)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (6,069)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (6,069)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (1.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (1.69)



</TABLE>
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (1)

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  the  following  certification  is  being  made to
accompany  Catskill  Litigation  Trust's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2005;

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Catskill  Litigation  Trust (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Joseph
E. Bernstein,  Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that to my knowledge:

          (1)     The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or  Section  15(d),  as  applicable,  of the  Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)     The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ Joseph E. Bernstein
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Joseph E. Bernstein
                                          Title: Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                          Date:  May 13, 2005

          (1)     A  signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by
                  Section 906 has been provided to Catskill Litigation Trust and
                  will be retained by Catskill Litigation Trust and furnished to
                  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff  upon
                  request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
```
IN RE E.J.C.

No. COA05-990.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Wayne (04JT194).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Zoran Stevic, Also Known as Stevic Zoran, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 579]

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered on or about May 7, 2001, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

*863Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Friedman, J.P., Sullivan, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
IN RE J.A.

No. COA05-762.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from Anson (99J27).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.