alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013335EN.01004501.xml

| 14.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 335/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 335/45

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 9 December 2013

appointing a German member and a German alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/757/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Martina MICHELS. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Martina MICHELS.

| (3) | An alternate member’s seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Frank ZIMMERMANN as member of the Committee of the Regions, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

An alternate member’s seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Frank ZIMMERMANN as member of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Mr Frank ZIMMERMANN, Mitglied des Abgeordnetenhauses von Berlin; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Mr Frank ZIMMERMANN, Mitglied des Abgeordnetenhauses von Berlin;

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Sven RISSMANN, Mitglied des Abgeordnetenhauses von Berlin. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Sven RISSMANN, Mitglied des Abgeordnetenhauses von Berlin.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2013.

For the Council

The President

A. PABEDINSKIENĖ

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
# L_2012308EN.01000501.xml

| 8.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 308/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 308/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1032/2012

of 26 October 2012

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Ciliegia di Vignola (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Ciliegia di Vignola’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Ciliegia di Vignola’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 October 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 52, 22.2.2012, p. 17.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Ciliegia di Vignola (PGI)

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew
      A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








*/s/
                Matthew A. Jones*Matthew
                A. JonesChief
                Financial OfficerMay
                10, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 567 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 567

   To ensure Pell Grant eligibility for any student whose parent or 
  guardian died as a result of performing military service in Iraq or 
                 Afghanistan after September 11, 2001.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2007

 Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself, Mr. Young of Alaska, 
Mr. Lampson, Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. Engel, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, 
   Mr. Conyers, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Ms. Lee, Ms. Hirono, Mr. 
Ortiz, Mr. Berman, Mr. Hare, Mr. Pomeroy, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Rangel, Ms. 
  Jackson-Lee of Texas, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Cohen, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. 
Fortenberry, Ms. Harman, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Lewis 
 of Kentucky, Mr. McCaul of Texas, Mr. Hinojosa, and Mr. Bishop of New 
    York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To ensure Pell Grant eligibility for any student whose parent or 
  guardian died as a result of performing military service in Iraq or 
                 Afghanistan after September 11, 2001.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Children of Fallen Soldiers Pell 
Grant Act of 2007''.

SEC. 2. CALCULATION OF FEDERAL PELL GRANT ELIGIBILITY.

    Section 401(f) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1070a(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4)(A) Notwithstanding paragraph (1) or any other 
        provision of this section, the expected family contribution of 
        each student described in subparagraph (B) shall be deemed to 
        be zero for the period during which each such student is 
        eligible to receive a Federal Pell Grant under subsection (c).
            ``(B) Subparagraph (A) shall apply to any student at an 
        institution of higher education--
                    ``(i) whose parent or guardian was a member of the 
                Armed Forces of the United States who died as a result 
                of performing military service in Iraq or Afghanistan 
                after September 11, 2001; and
                    ``(ii) who was 18 years or less, or was enrolled as 
                a full-time or part-time student at an institution of 
                higher education, as of the time of the parent or 
                guardian's death.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by section 2 of this Act shall apply with 
respect to Federal Pell Grants awarded for academic year 2008-2009, and 
each succeeding academic year.
                                 <all>
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5701 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acetamiprid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2008 

Mr. HOLDEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acetamiprid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACETAMIPRID. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.72 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 (E)-N1-[(6-Chloro-3-pyridyl)methyl]-N2-cyano-N1-meth7 yl-acetamidine (Acetamiprid)) is amended by striking the 

8 date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2011’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5701 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 96-4436

JOHN WESLEY BROOKS, a/k/a Tucker,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg.

Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge.

(CR-95-320)

Submitted: March 13, 1997

Decided: March 24, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Tara Dawn Shurling, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant.

J. Rene Josey, United States Attorney, Cameron G. Chandler, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

John Wesley Brooks appeals from his criminal sentence, and we

affirm. Brooks alleges that the Government breached his plea agreement by failing to polygraph his co-defendants, whose testimony was

used to fix the amount of drugs for which Brooks was responsible.

Brooks also contends that his erroneous belief that the Government

would polygraph his co-defendants, if he himself was polygraphed,

constituted a material mistake justifying specific enforcement of the

agreement.

The Government informed Brooks that it was not going to move

for a downward departure for substantial assistance because it

believed that Brooks had not been completely truthful. Brooks then

insisted on a polygraph evaluation, which he failed. A revised presentence report was prepared attributing Brooks with more drugs than

discussed in the plea agreement. The factual basis for the new quantity was statements by co-defendants who had not been polygraphed.

Our review of the record reveals that the Government did not

breach the plea agreement. The agreement clearly states that Brooks's

unsatisfactory performance on a polygraph test would relieve the

Government of all obligations under the agreement. The plea agreement neither discussed nor provided for polygraph examinations of

co-defendants or anyone else other than Brooks. Thus, we find that

Brooks failed to prove the Government's breach. See United States v.

Conner, 930 F.2d 1073, 1076 (4th Cir. 1991). In addition, we find that

any subjective understanding Brooks had regarding a duty to polygraph his co-defendants was unreasonable in the face of the unambiguous agreement and, therefore, does not entitle Brooks to specific

performance of the agreement.

Accordingly, we affirm Brooks's sentence. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
#### Richard Shotell et al., Plaintiffs, v Hodgson Russ LLP, Appellant, and Brody & Weiss Zucarelli & Urbanek CPA’s, PC, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 205]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Nelson H. Cosgrove, J.), entered December 8, 2004. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that part of the motion of defendant Brody & Weiss Zucarelli & Urbanek CPA’s, PC to compel the continued deposition of and answers to certain questions by a partner in defendant Hodgson Russ LLP

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Presti v Schalck,*26 AD2d 793 [1966]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 40258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket Nos. FDA-2012-N-0280 and FDA-2021-N-0371]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approvals

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of 
information collections that have been approved by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn Capezzuto, Office of 
Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-
12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-3794, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f1f1d0e1c3b2e29290f292b2e6127273c61282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="58080a190b2c393e3e183e3c397630302b763f372e">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a list of FDA information 
collections recently approved by OMB under section 3507 of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507). The OMB control 
number and expiration date of OMB approval for each information 
collection are shown in table 1. Copies of the supporting statements 
for the information collections are available on the internet at 
https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. An Agency may not conduct or 
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of 
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

        Table 1--List of Information Collections Approved By OMB
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            OMB control    Date approval
           Title of collection                  No.           expires
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Financial Disclosure by Clinical               0910-0396       5/31/2025
 Investigators..........................
Accelerated Approval Disclosures on            0910-0872       5/31/2025
 Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug
 Websites...............................
Infant Formula Enforcement Discretion          0910-0903      11/30/2022
 Policy.................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: June 29, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-14358 Filed 7-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# L_2014104EN.01008201.xml

| 8.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 104/82 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 104/82

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU of 4 December 2013 confirming the acceptance of an undertaking offered in connection with the anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings concerning imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China for the period of application of definitive measures

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 325 of 5 December 2013
  )

On page 219:

for:

| ‘Hangzhou Bluesun New Material Technology Co. Ltd | B824 ’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Hangzhou Bluesun New Material Technology Co. Ltd

B824 ’

read:

| ‘Hangzhou Bluesun New Material Co. Ltd | B824 ’ |
| --- | --- |

‘Hangzhou Bluesun New Material Co. Ltd

B824 ’

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00517-CV

Mycal Antoine Poole, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 05-752-C368, HONORABLE J. F. CLAWSON JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Mycal Antoine Poole, an inmate confined in the Institutional Division of the Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, filed what he styled a “Counter Claim” against the State of Texas.

As best we can discern from his pleadings, Poole sought injunctive relief and damages under various

instruments of unclear nature and origin—signed by Poole and Lorraine Poole, Poole’s mother

and “authorized representative”—that he contends create debt obligations on the part of the State.

The State filed a plea to the jurisdiction, which was granted. Poole appeals from the dismissal.

We affirm the judgment.

DISCUSSION

Poole’s appellate brief does not summarize the facts underlying this appeal and fails

to make “a clear and concise argument for the contentions made, with appropriate citations to
 In his brief, Poole also asks this Court to take “mandatory judicial notice” of Clearfield 1

Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363 (1943), a case in which the United States Supreme Court

held that “[t]he rights and duties of the United States on commercial paper which it issues are

governed by federal rather than [state] law.” Id. at 366. We have considered Clearfield and

determined that it is not applicable to this appeal.

 Poole requests that the district court issue a “Perpetual Injunction” against the State 2

prohibiting it from “doing business in any name.” He also asks the district court to prohibit the State

from “further restraining [Poole] of his liberty” and to order the State “to have ‘ALL’ of [Poole’s]

Property returned to him.”

2

authorities and to the record.” See Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h). However, in the interest of justice,

we will address what appear to be the merits of Poole’s appeal.

In his brief, Poole questions the authority of the trial judge to “refus[e] jurisdiction”

and “impair[] the obligation of contracts.” We construe these questions as a challenge to the district 1

court’s grant of the State’s plea to the jurisdiction, the basis of which was sovereign immunity.

Poole’s claim implicates the State’s sovereign immunity: he seeks damages against the State,

to enforce contractual rights against the State, and to otherwise control state action. See Texas 2

Natural Res. Conservation Comm’n v. IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849, 853-55 (Tex. 2001); Director of

Dep’t of Agric. & Env’t v. Printing Indus. Ass’n, 600 S.W.2d 264, 265 (Tex. 1980). His suit

thus cannot be maintained absent legislative consent or statutory waiver, and he alleges neither.

IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d at 853-54. The district court thus did not err in sustaining the State’s plea to

the jurisdiction.

CONCLUSION

We affirm the judgment of the district court.
3

____________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Affirmed

Filed: July 18, 2007
ROSEWOOD INVESTMENTS, LLC v. BAXLEY CONST. CO., INC.

No. COA05-1243.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Cumberland (02CVS8884)

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated in part; affirmed in part Affirmed.
# Council Decision of 15 November 2013 on the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial            contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania            for a period of two years (2013/672/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 15 November 2013

# on the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries                        Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania for a period of two years                     

# (2013/672/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43, in conjunction with point                           (a) of Article 218(6), thereof,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

(1)On 30 November 2006, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 1801/2006 on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement                              between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania(1) (‘the Partnership Agreement’).

(2)The Union has negotiated a new Protocol with the Islamic Republic of Mauritania (‘the new Protocol’) granting EU vessels fishing                              opportunities in waters in which Mauritania exercises its sovereignty or its jurisdiction as regards fishing.

(3)The new Protocol was signed on the basis of Council Decision 2012/827/EU(2) and has been applied provisionally from the date of its signature.

(4)The new Protocol should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement                     between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania for a period of two years (‘the Protocol’)(3) is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.                  

# Article 2U.K.

The President of the Council shall proceed, on behalf of the Union, to the notification provided for in Article 11 of the                     Protocol(4).                  

# Article 3U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 15 November 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

R. Šadžius                            

1

OJ L 343, 8.12.2006, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 361, 31.12.2012, p. 43.                           

3

The text of the Protocol has been published in OJ L 361, 31.12.2012, p. 44 together with the decision on the signature.                           

4

The date of entry into force of the Protocol will be published in the *Official Journal of the European Union* by the General Secretariat of the Council.