alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 99

March 25, 2002

United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the Temporary Final Rule and Final Rule: Requirements for Arthur
Andersen LLP Auditing Clients effective as of March 18, 2002, Allin Corporation
states that Arthur Andersen LLP has made the following representations
concerning its audit of the consolidated balance sheets of Allin Corporation as
of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2001. Arthur Andersen LLP has represented that the
audit was subject to their quality control system for the United States
accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there
was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen LLP personnel working on the
audit, availability of national office consultation, and availability of
personnel at foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen LLP to conduct the relevant
portions of the audit.

Sincerely,


/s/ Dean C. Praskach
--------------------
Dean C. Praskach
----------------
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

          - [CDC-2022-0066; Docket Number NIOSH-346]

# AGENCY:

Agency: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Extension of public comment period.

# SUMMARY:

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), an Operating Division of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announces the extension of the comment period to obtain public comment on draft personal protective technology (PPT) targets for 2020 to 2030.

# DATES:

The comment period is extended through August 31, 2022.

# ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments, identified by CDC-2022-0066 and docket number NIOSH-346, by either of the following two methods:
      -  Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.                          Follow the instructions for submitting comments.                    
      - Mail: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH Docket Office, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-34, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226-1998.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dr. Susan M. Moore, NIOSH NPPTL, Building 141, 626 Cochrans Mill Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15236; Telephone: 412-386-6111.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On May 16, 2022, NIOSH published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     (87 FR 29748) announcing a draft document entitled Draft NIOSH Healthcare Personal Protective Technology (PPT) Targets for 2020 to 2030 available for public comment. Written comments were to be received by July 15, 2022. In response to a request from the public, NIOSH is extending the public comment period to August 31, 2022.                

John J. Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2022-15084 Filed 7-13-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
# C_2017191EN.01001201.xml

| 16.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/12

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 June 2017

appointing the Vice-President of the Community Plant Variety Office

(2017/C 191/02)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights (1), and in particular Article 43(3) thereof,

1

Whereas:

| (1) | By Decision of 19 March 2012 (2), the Council renewed the term of office of Mr Carlos PEREIRA GODINHO as Vice-President of the Community Plant Variety Office (the ‘Office’). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Decision of 19 March 2012 (2), the Council renewed the term of office of Mr Carlos PEREIRA GODINHO as Vice-President of the Community Plant Variety Office (the ‘Office’).

2

| (2) | The term of office of Mr Carlos PEREIRA GODINHO expired on 31 March 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The term of office of Mr Carlos PEREIRA GODINHO expired on 31 March 2017.

| (3) | On 12 April 2017, after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Office, the Commission proposed Mr Francesco MATTINA as a single candidate for the post of Vice-President of the Office, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 12 April 2017, after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Office, the Commission proposed Mr Francesco MATTINA as a single candidate for the post of Vice-President of the Office,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1.   Mr Francesco MATTINA is hereby appointed Vice-President of the Community Plant Variety Office (the ‘Office’) for a period of 5 years.

2.   The term of office of Mr Francesco MATTINA shall run from the date on which he takes up his duties. This date shall be agreed between the President and the Administrative Council of the Office.

Article 2

The Chairperson of the Administrative Council of the Office shall be empowered to sign the contract of employment with Mr Francesco MATTINA.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 12 June 2017.

For the Council

The President

C. CAMILLERI

---

(1)  OJ L 227, 1.9.1994, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 19 March 2012 renewing the term of office of the Vice-President of the Community Plant Variety Office (OJ C 82, 21.3.2012, p. 6).

2

---
Exhibit 1







Exhibit 10.2







2005 Annual Incentive Program Goals and Awards for the Named Executive Officers



Alexander Davern, Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President Manufacturing & IT Operations; Treasurer




	


1/1/05 Base Salary:



Bonus % Potential:



Bonus Dollars:
	


$250,000



30%



$75,000
	 
	


2005 Officer Bonus Goal
	


% Goal Weighting
	


Goal



$ Value

	1) Develop and present to the Board a coordinated plan for obtaining annual sales growth



	


10%
	


$7,500

	2) Manufacturing to meet delivery and quality goals



	


20%
	


$15,000

	3) Achieve gross margin goal



	


20%
	


$15,000

	4) Ensure 2005 spending within budget



	


20%
	


$15,000

	5) Achieve internal controls goals



	


15%
	


$11,250

	6) Drive down IT & Finance worldwide costs per employee 



	


15%
	


$11,250

	


Total
	


100%
	


$75,000















Timothy Dehne, Senior Vice President, Research & Development




	


1/1/05 Base Salary: 



Bonus % Potential: 



Bonus Dollars:
	


$235,000



30%



$70,500
	 
	


2005 Officer Bonus Goal
	


% Goal Weighting
	


Goal 



$ Value

	1) Develop and present to the Board a coordinated plan for obtaining annual sales growth



	


10%
	


$7,050

	2) Achieve scheduled product development release goals and increase new product output



	


30%
	


$21,150

	3) Achieve strategic initiative goals 



	


25%
	


$17,625

	4) Achieve product revenue goals



	


25%
	


$17,625

	5) Achieve gross margin and EROI goals



	


10%
	


$7,050

	


Total
	


100%
	


$70,500















 



 



Peter Zogas, Senior Vice President Sales & Marketing




	


1/1/05 Base Salary: 



Bonus % Potential: 



Bonus Dollars:
	


$240,000



30%



$72,000
	 
	


2005 Officer Bonus Goal
	


% Goal



Weighting
	


Goal $



Value

	1) Develop and present to the Board a coordinated plan for obtaining annual sales growth



	


10%
	


$7,200

	2) Achieve new product revenue goals



	


25%
	


$18,000

	3) Achieve applications goals



	


25%
	


$18,000

	4) Meet quota for major accounts



	


20%
	


$14,400

	5) Achieve keynote delivery goals



	


20%
	


$14,400

	


Total
	


100%
	


$72,000











 



John Graff, Vice President, Marketing, Customer Operations and Investor Relations




	


1/1/05 Base Salary: 



Bonus % Potential: 



Bonus Dollars:
	


$205,000



20%



$41,000
	 
	


2005 Officer Bonus Goal
	


% Goal



Weighting
	


Goal $



Value

	1)Achieve product revenue goals



	


25%
	


$10,250

	2)Achieve interactions goals



	


20%
	


$8,200

	3)Achieve web revenue goals



	


20%
	


$8,200

	4)Achieve keynote system goals



	


20%
	


$8,200

	5)Drive down worldwide marketing costs 



	


15%
	


$6,150

	


Total
	


100%
	


$41,000
PENDER COUNTY v. BARTLETT.

No. 103A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 10, 2006.

Carl W. Thurman, III, for Pender County, et al.

Tiare B. Smiley, Alexander McC. Peters, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, for Gary Bartlett, et al.

Julius L. Chambers, John Charles Boger, Charlotte, for Moore, Farrior & Jordan.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of May 2006 by Cindy Moore, Milford Farrior and Mary Jordan for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(*l*). By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of May 2006."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

The Archivist of the United States has determined that the establishment of the Advisory Committee on Electronic Records Archives is necessary and is in the public interest in connection with the President's Management Agenda's e-government initiatives. This committee will comply with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2). 

This Committee shall advise the Archivist of the United States on technical, mission, and service issues related to the Electronic Records Archives (ERA). It will advise and make recommendations to the Archivist on issues related to the development, implementation, and use of the ERA system. 

The Committee will be composed of not more that 20 voting members considered having particular expertise, knowledge and experience in electronic records. Members will be appointed by the Archivist of the United States. 

Unless renewed by appropriate action prior to its expiration, the Charter for the Advisory Committee on the Electronic Records Archives will expire two years from the date of establishment. 

Dated: August 17, 2005. 

Mary Ann Hadyka, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 05-16786 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________
No. 16

- 2536

_____________
CHRISTINE BERNAT
,

Appellant

v.
STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIAM HAUCK, administrator of the Edna Mahan Correctional Facility for Wome n; ERICK MELGAR, all individually and in their capacity as a current and/or State Correctional Officer; JANETTE BENNETT, all individually and in their capacity as a current and/or former State Correctional Officer; ALFRED E. SMALLS, all individually and in their capacity as a current and/or former State Correctional Officer; JEFFREY S. ELLIS, all individually and in their capacity as a current and/or former State Correctional Officer; LANCE K. JOHNSON, all individually and in their capacity as a current and /or former State Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE 1

- 10; JOHN DOE ENTITY 1

- 10

_____________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.C. No. 12

- cv

- 02649 ) District J udge: Honorable Michael A. Shipp

_____________ Submitted Pursuant to Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

June 8 , 2017

Before: CHAGARES, VANASKIE, and FUENTES Circuit Judges

.

(Filed June 20, 2017 )

____________
JUDGMENT ORDER

____________ Following the District Court’s grant of summary judgment on October 28, 2015 as
to defendants State of New Jersey Department of Correction, William Hauck, Jeffr e y S.Ellis, and Lance K. Johnson and entries of stipulations of dismissal as to defendants

Alfred E. Smalls and Erick Melgar on April 19, 2016, plaintiff Christine Bernat filed this
appeal.

Bernat requested entry of default against defendant Jannette Bennett earlier in the
litigation, on October 24, 2013. The clerk entered default as to Bennett the following
day. However, no default judgment was eve r entered as to Bennett.
This Court requested supplemental briefing from the parties. The parties agreed
that final judgment had not been entered against Bennett. Counsel for appellees also

argue d that the stipulations of dismi ssal as to Smalls and Melgar were not with prejudice
and thus also do not constitute final judgments.
Having reviewed the record below, the Court agrees that there is no final judgment

as to Bennett and
, thus , this C ourt lacks jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C . § 1291 and will
dismiss the appeal on that basis. The Court declines to make a ruling as to the finality of
the claims against Smalls and Melgar as it is not necessary for the dismissal at this time.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED by th is Court that thi s appeal is

dismissed for l ack of jurisdiction. The parties are to bear their own costs.

BY THE COURT:
s/Michael A. Chagares Circuit Judge ATTEST :

s/ Marcia M. Waldron Clerk

Date d : June 20, 2017
H. R. 5631 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1155 Seminole 

Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CORPORAL BRADLEY T. ARMS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. Arms 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CORNELL HESTER,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 65, 2021

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1002002758 (N)

§

§

§

Submitted: March 23, 2021

Decided: April 13, 2021

ORDER

On March 2, 2021, the appellant, Cornell Hester filed a notice of appeal from 

a Superior Court order, docketed on January 21, 2021, denying his motion for public 

emergency health credits under New Jersey Senate Bill 2519. A timely notice of 

appeal should have been filed on or before February 22, 2021.

1

 On March 5, 2021, 

the Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Hester to show cause why the appeal 

should not be dismissed as untimely. On March 15, 2021, the Court received the 

certified mail receipt indicating that the notice to show cause had been delivered on 

March 12, 2021. A timely response to the notice to show cause was due by March 

1 Supr. Ct. R. 6(a)(iv) (providing that postconviction appeals must be filed within thirty days after 

entry of the judgment or order upon the docket); Supr. Ct. R. 11(a) (providing that the last day of 

the computed time period does not include Saturday or Sunday).
2

22, 2021. To date, Hester has not responded to the notice to show cause. Dismissal 

of this appeal is therefore deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that under Supreme Court Rules 

3(b)(2) and 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of Internet Infinity, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





July 14, 2010
By:
/s/ George MorrisGeorge MorrisChief Executive Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Internet Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Internet Infinity, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HomeOcean Facts

# What is the largest sea turtle?

## The leatherback is the largest living sea turtle.

Leatherback turtle consuming a jellyfish off Cape Cod. (NMFS Permit #1557-03).

Weighing in at between 550 and 2,000 pounds with lengths of  up to six feet, the leatherback is a big turtle! Leatherback sea turtles can be  distinguished from other species of sea turtle by its lack of a hard shell or  scales. Instead, leatherbacks are covered with a firm, rubbery skin.

You can find leatherback sea turtles as far north as Canada  and the northern Pacific Ocean. They tend to nest in the tropics, however. Within  the United States, the leatherback is known to nest in southeast Florida, Puerto  Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

The leatherback sea turtle feeds primarily on jellyfish.

The U.S. federal government has listed the leatherback as  endangered worldwide. Primary threats to the turtles include incidental take in  commercial fisheries and marine pollution, as well as the harvest of eggs.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - Leatherback Turtle
          - Northeast  Fisheries Science Center Fish FAQ

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
ALLSTATE INS. CO. v. STILWELL.

No. COA05-1393.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 1, 2006.

Certification Date August 21, 2006.

Appeal from Caldwell 04CVS1380).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jose Amilpas v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-14-00053-CR

Trial court case number: 1334791

Trial court: 174th District Court of Harris County

This appeal was previously abated for appointment of counsel following the death of 

appellant’s previous attorney. We are in receipt of a supplemental clerk’s record and reporter’s 

record of the abatement hearing stating that Daucie Schindler has been appointed to represent 

appellant. This case is reinstated and placed on our active docket. 

The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have previously been filed. Appellant’s brief is 

due within 30 days of the date of this order. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 3, 2014
**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2010 (the “Report”) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JAMES C. ZELTER, the Chief Executive Officer of theRegistrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. 

/s/ JAMES C. ZELTER                    

Name: James C. Zelter 

Date: November 4, 2010
STATE v. HERRING.

No. COA05-1060.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 20, 2006.

Certification Date July 10, 2006.

Appeal from New Hanover (02CRS21547).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. Ryan Gabriel GARCELL.

No. 465A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2006.

Thomas Maher, Chapel Hill, for Ryan Gabriel Garcell.

Charlie C. Walker, Asheville, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of September 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time for Court Reporters to Prepare and Deliver Transcripts:

"Motion Allowed. Court reporter shall have up to and including the 1st day of November 2006 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel. By order of the Court in conference this the 28th day of September 2006."