alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 589/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 589/2013 of 20 Jume 2013 withdrawing the suspension of submission of applications            for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 589/2013                     

# of 20 Jume 2013

# withdrawing the suspension of submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (‘Single CMO’ Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009 opening and providing for the administration                           of certain Community tariff quotas in the sugar sector(2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Submission of applications for import licences concerning order number 09.4318 were suspended as from 27 September 2012 by                              Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 879/2012 of 26 September 2012 fixing the allocation coefficient for the issuing                              of import licences applied for from 8 to 14 September 2012 for sugar products under certain tariff quotas and suspending submission                              of applications for such licences(3), in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 891/2009.

(2)Following notifications on unused and/or partly used licences, quantities became available again for that order number. The                              suspension of applications should therefore be withdrawn,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The suspension laid down by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 879/2012 of submission of applications for import licences for                     order number 09.4318 as from 27 September 2012 is withdrawn.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 June 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President,*                            

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 254, 26.9.2009, p. 82.                           

3

OJ L 259, 27.9.2012, p. 3.
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49687]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16893]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD


Sunshine Act; Notice of Public Meeting

    Notice is hereby given that the Railroad Retirement Board will hold 
a meeting on August 30, 2005, 9:30 a.m., at the Board's meeting room on 
the 8th floor of its headquarters building, 844 North Rush Street, 
Chicago, Illinois, 60611. The agenda for this meeting follows:
    (1) IDMS to DB2 Conversion
    (2) Discussion on Field Service Hiring
    (3) Decision on Reconsideration--DisAbility ReDesign, Inc.
    The entire meeting will be open to the public. The person to 
contact for more information is Beatrice Ezerski, Secretary to the 
Board, Phone No. 312-751-4920.

    Dated: August 18, 2005.
Beatrice Ezerski,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 05-16893 Filed 8-22-05; 9:51 am]
BILLING CODE 7905-01-M
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 164 (Thursday, August 25, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 49969]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-16909]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending August 5, 
2005

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, 
as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.

    Docket Number: OST-2005-22028.
    Date Filed: August 2, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

Montreal, 14-16 June 2005 (Memo 0113), TC12 North Atlantic Canada-
Europe Resolutions r1-r16.
Minutes PTC12 CAN-EUR (Memo 0115), Technical Correction PTC12 North-
Atlantic Canada-Europe (Memo 0114).
Tables: TC12 North Atlantic Canada-Europe Specified fares, Tables (Memo 
0045).
Intended effective date: 1 November 2005.

    Docket Number: OST-2005-22029.
    Date Filed: August 2, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

Mail Vote 448.
TC12 North Atlantic USA-Europe (Memo 0183) (except between USA and 
Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, 
Italy, Netherlands, Scandinavia, Switzerland).
Mail Vote 449.
TC12 North Atlantic USA-Europe (Memo 0184) (between USA and Austria, 
Belgium, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, 
Scandinavia, Switzerland) r1-r34.
Minutes: TC12 North Atlantic Canada, USA-Europe (Memo 0185), Montreal, 
14-16 June 2005.
Tables: TC12 North Atlantic USA-Europe Specified Fares Tables (Memo 
0100).
Intended effective date: 1 November 2005.
    Docket Number: OST-2005-22030.
    Date Filed: August 2, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

TC2 Within Middle East Expedited Resolution 002ac (Memo 0146).
TC2 Europe-Middle East Expedited Resolution 002ab (Memo 0203).
Intended effective date: 15 August 2005.
    Docket Number: OST-2005-22038.
    Date Filed: August 2, 2005.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject:

PTC3 0869 Dated 2 August 2005.
Mail Vote 450--Resolution 010q.
TC3 Japan, Korea-South East Asia Special Passenger Amending Resolution 
between Japan and China (excluding Hong Kong SAR and Macao SAR).
Intended effective date: 5 August 2005.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 05-16909 Filed 8-24-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
NOLAN v. VILLAGE OF MARVIN.

No. 488A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 30, 2005.

Robert E. Hornik, Jr., Chapel Hill, for William J. Nolan, III, et al.

Anthony Fox, Benjamin R. Sullivan, Charlotte, for Village of Marvin.

Lydia Boesch, for Residents of Pinewild Farms, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of November 2005 by Residents of Pinewild Farms, et al for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of November 2005."
STATE v. STONER.

COA06-32.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Iredell (01CRS58200).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                         Annual Compliance Certificate

Bank One, West Virginia, N.A., as Trustee
707 Virginia Street East, 2nd Floor
Charleston, West Virginia  25301

Attention:  Corporate Trust Department

     I, C. David Ramsey, President of Southpoint Structured Assets Inc. (the
"Depositor"), hereby certify as follows:

     (a)  The review of the activities of the Depositor under the Standard
Terms for Trust Agreements, dated as of November 1, 1996, as amended by the
Series Supplement, dated as of March 19, 1998 (collectively, the "TVA Series
1998-1 Trust Agreement"), by and between the Depositor and Bank One, West
Virginia, N.A., as trustee, for the period from January 1, 2000, through
December 31, 2000, and the performance of the Depositor under the TVA Series
1998-1 Trust Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

     (b)  To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Depositor has
fulfilled all of its obligations and covenants under the TVA Series 1998-1 Trust
Agreement throughout such period.

     Dated:  March 1, 2001

                                           Sincerely,

                                           By: /s/ C. David Ramsey,
                                               ------------------------------
                                                   C. David Ramsey, President
STATE v. Fred C. SINK.

No. 347P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 10, 2006.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 631 S.E.2d 16.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of July 2006 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of July 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,367
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   59,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,301
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                73,010
<PP&E>                                         135,462
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 856,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,391
<BONDS>                                        570,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            14
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   856,699
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               132,379
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (354)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (354)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)
        

</TABLE>
# Commission Directive 2013/52/EU (repealed)Show full title

Commission Directive 2013/52/EU of 30 October 2013 amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment (Text with EEA            relevance) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Directive 2013/52/EU                     

# of 30 October 2013

# amending Council Directive 96/98/EC on marine equipment

# (Text with EEA relevance) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Directive 2014/90/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on marine equipment and repealing Council                                 Directive 96/98/EC Text with EEA relevance.
STATE v. RANDOLPH

No. COA06-252

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Pitt (03CRS58462, 04CRS18416).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-6153
SALEEM NURIDDIN ABDULLAH, Petitioner - Appellant, versus LLOYD L. WATERS, Warden; NELSON J. BAKER, Assistant Warden; RICHARD A. LANHAM, SR., Commissioner; MELANIE C. PEREIRA, Deputy Commissioner; SECURITY CHIEF SMITH; THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; LEHRMAN W. DOTSON, Assistant Warden; SAMUEL HAWKINS, Security Chief; CALVINVINCENT, CCMS II, Transfer Coordinator; TRANSPORTATION UNIT, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-97- 3565-AMD) Submitted: April 16, 1998 Decided: May 4, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Saleem Nuriddin Abduallah, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his complaint in which he seeks injunctive relief against various prison officials. A dismissal without prejudice isnot reviewable by the court unless the reasons stated for the dismissal clearly disclose that no amendment to the complaint could cure its defects. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). In the present case, the district court properly found that Appellant failed to show that he would suffer irreparable harm if the requested relief was not granted. The appeal is therefore dismissed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED