alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATION FOUND ON
PAGES 1 AND 2 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,384
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                       610
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,429
<PP&E>                                           4,645
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,435
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,902
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,395
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                67,244
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,490
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             13,937
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,937
<EPS-BASIC>                                       3.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.81


</TABLE>
PHILLIPS v. ANGELO'S SHOES, INC.

No. COA05-1091.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 19, 2006

Certification Date October 9, 2006.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #219411)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1410/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1410/2013 of 23 December 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1410/2013                     

# of 23 December 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE v. WITHAM.

No. COA05-1350.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 18, 2006.

Certification Date August 7, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (04CRS26009, 04CRS25864).

Case without published opinion. No error in part; vacated and remanded in part.
ROBINS v. TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH.

No. 154A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 9, 2006.

Susan K. Burkhart, for Town of Hillsborough.

Seth R. Cohen, Greensboro, for Robins.

Richard A. Zechini, for NCAR.

Craig D. Justus, Asheville, for NCOAA.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of June 2006 by Amicus (NCHBA, NCAR, NCOAA) for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of June 2006."
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1248 CA 12-00668 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, WHALEN, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

WILLIAM F. WHITE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF BONNIE L. WHITE, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

FRANK B. IACOVANGELO, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF THAD BOSS, M.D., DECEASED, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND TARA J. MAHAR, M.D., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

DEMPSEY & DEMPSEY, BUFFALO (HELEN K. DEMPSEY OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
WARD GREENBERG HELLER & REIDY LLP, ROCHESTER (DANIEL P. PURCELL OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Marianne Furfure, A.J.), entered June 30, 2011. The order granted the motion of defendants for summary judgment dismissing all claims against defendant Tara J. Mahar, M.D.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: November 9, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
STATE v. BAXTER.

No. COA06-251.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from Rowan (04CRS54246, 04CRS54247, 04CRS54248).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
STATE of North Carolina v. Brett Charles BROWNING.

No. 334P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill, for Brett Charles Browning.

Jane Rankin Thompson, Assistant Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of June 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1282/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1282/2013 of 10 December 2013 correcting the Polish language version of Regulation            (EC) No 2508/2000 laying down the detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 as regards operational            programmes in the fisheries sector (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1282/2013                     

# of 10 December 2013

# correcting the Polish language version of Regulation (EC) No 2508/2000 laying down the detailed rules for the application                        of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 as regards operational programmes in the fisheries sector (repealed)                     

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1420/2013 of 17 December 2013 repealing Regulations (EC) No 347/96, (EC) No 1924/2000,                                 (EC) No 1925/2000, (EC) No 2508/2000, (EC) No 2509/2000, (EC) No 2813/2000, (EC) No 2814/2000, (EC) No 150/2001, (EC) No 939/2001,                                 (EC) No 1813/2001, (EC) No 2065/2001, (EC) No 2183/2001, (EC) No 2318/2001, (EC) No 2493/2001, (EC) No 2306/2002, (EC) No 802/2006,                                 (EC) No 2003/2006, (EC) No 696/2008 and (EC) No 248/2009 following the adoption of Regulation (EU) No 1379/2013 of the European                                 Parliament and of the Council on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products.
IN RE Z.C.M.

No. COA06-514

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed January 2, 2007

Certification Date January 22, 2007

Appeal from Alamance (04J134, 04J135).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed in part, dismissed in part.
STATE v. HICKS.

No. COA05-1200.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from New Hanover (04CRS51966).

Case without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.4

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Sokol,  Chief  Executive  Officer of MidAmerican  Funding,  LLC (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the  quarterly
         period ended  September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  November 5, 2003




                               /s/ David L. Sokol
                               ------------------
                                 David L. Sokol
                             Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF U.S. FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                                  STATE OF INCORPORATION/ORGANIZATION
----------                                  -----------------------------------
<S>                                         <C>
Microtel Inns and Suites Franchising, Inc.                 Georgia

Hawthorn Suites Franchising, Inc.                          Georgia

Microtel Inns Realty Corp.                                 Georgia

Microtel International, Inc.                               Georgia

U.S. Funding Corp.                                         Georgia

U.S. Franchise Capital, Inc.                               Georgia

Equity Partners, LP                                        Delaware

USFS Equity, LLC                                           Delaware

Tempe Inns Realty Corp.                                    Georgia

Chandler Inns Realty Corp.                                 Georgia

Tempe Holdings, LLC                                        Arizona

Chandler Holdings, LLC                                     Arizona

HSA Properties, LLC                                        Delaware

Best Acquisition, Inc.                                     Georgia

USFS Management, Inc.                                      Georgia

Best Franchising, Inc.                                     Georgia

RSVP-BI OPCO, LLC                                          Delaware
</TABLE>


                                       66
STATE v. David Earl JONES.

No. 439P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2006.

Tina A. Krasner, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of August 2006 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal Under G.S. 7A-30(1) and Petition for Discretionary Review Under G.S. 7A-31":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of December 2006."
Glenn I. HODGE, Jr. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

No. 36P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

John C. Hunter, Charlotte, for Glenn Hodge, Jr.

Alexandra M. Hightower, Assistant Attorney General, for DOT.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of January 2006 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
STATE v. ANDERSON.

No. COA06-570.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Lincoln (04CRS50515).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2011 

p0321 

Order 

 

March 29, 2011 

142065 

SHERYL A. BEACH, f/k/a 

SHERYL A. LYMAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142065 

 COA: 297807 

Macomb CC: 2008-001774-CZ 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CHESTERFIELD, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 30, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                              AS OF MARCH 30, 2000


FULL NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                         PLACE OF INCORPORATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LASON SERVICES, INC                             DELAWARE, USA

LASON SYSTEMS, INC.                             DELAWARE, USA

LASON INTERNATIONAL, INC.                       DELAWARE, USA

LASON U.K.,  LTD                                UNITED KINGDOM

LASON CANADA COMPANY                            NOVA SCOTIA, CANADA

LASON DE MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE C.V.              MEXICO

DATALOGIC (GRENADA) LTD.                        GRENADA

OFFSHORE KEYBOARDING CORP.                      BARBADOS

PROMOTORA DE TECHNOLOGIA, S.A. DE C.V.          MEXICO

IMAGENES DIGITALES, S.A. DE C.V.                MEXICO

VETRI SOFTWARE INDIA LIMITED                    INDIA

LASON SYSTEMS PMC, INC.                         DELAWARE, USA

LASON LTD.                                      UNITED KINGDOM

APPLIED MICRO TECHNOLOGY, INC.                  VIRGINIA, USA

MEMEX, INC.                                     VIRGINIA, USA

MR DATA MANAGEMENT, INC.                        DELAWARE, USA

MR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.                           GEORGIA, USA

ELECTRONIC GRAPHIC IMAGE SYSTEMS, INC.          GEORGIA, USA

FORT KNOX SAFE DEPOSIT, INC.                    GEORGIA, USA

FORT KNOX ESCROW SERVICES, INC.                 GEORGIA, USA

LASON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT LIMITED            UNITED KINGDOM

M-R MICRONITE SYSTEMS, LTD.                     UNITED KINGDOM

M-R DPTS LIMITED                                UNITED KINGDOM

M-R DIGITAL CAPTURE SERVICES LIMITED            UNITED KINGDOM

M-R GROUP SYSTEMS, LTD.                         UNITED KINGDOM
<PAGE>
 
                            CONTROL DEVICES, INC                  Exhibit 11
                       CALCULATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE           
                (Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
                                                       
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Three Months Ended                        Nine Months Ended
Primary:                                   September 30, 1997   September 30, 1996    September 30, 1997   September 30, 1996
                                           -------------------- ------------------    ------------------   ------------------ 
<S>                                        <C>                  <C>                   <C>                  <C>
Net income applicable to common                       
 shareholders                                         $1,214              $  815              $4,439              $2,808
 
Weighted average number of  Common                     
 Shares outstanding:                                   4,963               2,564               4,963               2,564   
Weighted average number of  common                        
 shares equivalents options                              161                -                    129                - 
                                               ------------------  -----------------   -------------------  ------------------ 
Weighted average number of  common                       
 shares and equivalents options                        5,124               2,564               5,093               2,564 
                                               ==================  =================   ===================  ==================

Earnings per share - Primary                          $ 0.24              $ 0.32              $ 0.87              $ 1.10
 
 
Fully Diluted:
 
Net income applicable to common                       
 shareholders                                         $1,214              $  815              $4,439              $2,808 
 
Weighted average number of  common                     
 shares and equivalents options                        5,124               2,564               5,093               2,564 
Additional common shares issuable                         
 assuming full dilution                                   16                -                     47                - 
                                              ------------------  -----------------   -------------------  ------------------ 
Weighted average number of  common            
 shares and equivalents options               
 assuming full dilution                                5,140               2,564               5,140               2,564     
                                              ==================  =================   ===================  ================== 

Earnings per share - Fully diluted                    $ 0.24              $ 0.32              $ 0.86              $ 1.10
 
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**Certification**
I, C. Keith Swaney, President and Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer of PVFCapital Corp., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PVF CapitalCorp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s first fiscal quarter that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions);
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 8, 2004    /s/ C. Keith Swaney   C. Keith Swaney President and Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT


TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned Officer of ERF Wireless, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007, (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




April 1,
2008








/s/ Richard R.
      Royall
              Richard
      R. Royall
              Chief
      Financial Officer