alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3031 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3031

  To amend the Clean Air Act to limit the use of ethanol to meet the 
            renewable fuel standard, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 19, 2008

Mrs. Hutchison (for herself, Mr. McCain, Mr. Sununu, Ms. Collins, Mrs. 
 Dole, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Allard, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. DeMint, Mr. Stevens, 
 and Mr. Enzi) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Clean Air Act to limit the use of ethanol to meet the 
            renewable fuel standard, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARD.

    (a) In General.--Section 211(o)(2)(B)(i) of the Clean Air Act (42 
U.S.C. 7545(o)(2)(B)(i)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
                                    ``(V) Limitation.--Notwithstanding 
                                any other provision of this clause, of 
                                the volume of renewable fuel required 
                                under subclause (I) for each of 
                                calendar years 2009 through 2022, the 
                                applicable volume of ethanol derived 
                                from corn starch shall not exceed 
                                9,000,000,000 gallons.
                                    ``(VI) Adjustment.--The 
                                Administrator, in coordination with the 
                                Secretary of Energy and the Secretary 
                                of Agriculture, shall adjust the 
                                applicable volumes of each fuel 
                                specified in subclauses (II), (III), 
                                and (IV) to reflect the limitation 
                                under subclause (V).''.
    (b) Compliance.--Section 211(o)(2)(A)(iii)(II) of the Clean Air Act 
(42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(2)(A)(iii)(II)) is amended--
            (1) in item (aa), by striking ``or'' after the semicolon at 
        the end;
            (2) in item (bb), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                                            ``(cc) impose any penalty 
                                        for failure to comply with 
                                        subclauses (II) through (IV) of 
                                        subparagraph (B)(i).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section take 
effect on January 1, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
IN RE A.J.

No. COA06-364.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05J83).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. SUTTON.

No. COA06-337.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from Guilford (05CRS68200).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
             EXTRACTED FROM THE AMMONIA HOLD, INC. FINANCIAL
             STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
             QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
             FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>  1

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>         JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>            JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>              JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                             11,181
<SECURITIES>                    1,218,740
<RECEIVABLES>                     792,021
<ALLOWANCES>                       25,275
<INVENTORY>                       858,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                3,271,920
<PP&E>                          2,251,495
<DEPRECIATION>                    281,212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  6,441,364
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             364,428
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                            7,638
<OTHER-SE>                      9,648,591
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    6,441,364
<SALES>                         2,865,837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,865,837
<CGS>                           1,519,614
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,905,228
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   466,798
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               466,798
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                      466,798
<EPS-BASIC>                        .061
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .061


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**


**As
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





Pursuant
      to, and for purposes only of, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned hereby certifies
      that (i) the Quarterly Report of KH Funding Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter
      ended September 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of KH Funding Company.





Date:
                November 13, 2008
            /s/
                Robert L. HarrisRobert
                L. HarrisChief
                Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
                Officer
Exhibit 4.7      CONSENT OF STEPHEN POITRAS   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2011 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I participated, as an independent Qualified Person (as such term is defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101  Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), in the preparation of an independent technical study, Technical Report and Recommendations, 2010 Geological Exploration Program, Anatacau Property, Quebec, February 2011, Technical Report and Recommendations, 2010 Geological Exploration Program, Wabamisk Property, Quebec, February 2011, and Progress Report, June 2010 Exploration Program, Eleonore Regional Property  September 2010 (collectively the Technical Studies) concerning mineralized mineral in the Anatacau and Eleonore properties for the Company. Portions of the Technical Studies are summarized under the heading Item III Description of the Business  3.2.4 Geological Setting, 3.2.5 Exploration Work and Drilling, 3.2.6 Mineralization, 3.5.4 Geological Setting, 3.5.5 Exploration Work and Drilling, and 3.5.6 Mineralization  in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2011 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference therein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.    Very truly yours,   /s/ Stephen Poitras Name:  Stephen Poitras, M.Sc., P.Geo   May 12, 2011
THE PENINSULA PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CRESCENT RESOURCES, LLC.

No. 421P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Michael David Bland, Matthews, for Property Owners.

John W. Francisco, Irvin W. Hankins, III, Charlotte, for Crescent Resources.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff on the 9th day of August 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Defendant, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of August 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ACT 5 FDS
FOR 1ST QUARTER 10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,484
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                       107
<INVENTORY>                                      3,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,717
<PP&E>                                          29,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,589
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,519
<BONDS>                                         74,072
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                         393
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,424
<SALES>                                         12,206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,206
<CGS>                                            1,872
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,035
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,482)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,482)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,482)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.53)
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. HOPPER.

No. COA06-313.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 20, 2007.

Certification Date March 12, 2007.

Appeal from Cleveland (02CRS56601, 02CRS56602).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# L_2013320EN.01008101.xml

| 30.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 320/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 320/81

---

DECISION OF THE MINISTERIAL COUNCIL OF THE ENERGY COMMUNITY

D/2013/03/MC-EnC

on extending the duration of the Energy Community Treaty

THE MINISTERIAL COUNCIL OF THE ENERGY COMMUNITY,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the Energy Community (“the Treaty”), and in particular Article 97 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Treaty was signed on 25 October 2005 and entered into force on 1 July 2006. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Treaty was signed on 25 October 2005 and entered into force on 1 July 2006.

| (2) | According to its Article 97, the Treaty is concluded for a period of 10 years from the date of entry into force and requires a decision by the Ministerial Council for its extension. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

According to its Article 97, the Treaty is concluded for a period of 10 years from the date of entry into force and requires a decision by the Ministerial Council for its extension.

| (3) | The Energy Community has proven to be an efficient framework for regional cooperation in the energy field. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Energy Community has proven to be an efficient framework for regional cooperation in the energy field.

| (4) | The Energy Community is following closely developments in the European Union’s energy policy and has entered into commitments that go beyond 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Energy Community is following closely developments in the European Union’s energy policy and has entered into commitments that go beyond 2016.

| (5) | The extension of the Treaty has been openly supported by the European Union institutions (1), as well as by the Permanent High Level Group at its meetings of 19 June and 23 October 2013, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The extension of the Treaty has been openly supported by the European Union institutions (1), as well as by the Permanent High Level Group at its meetings of 19 June and 23 October 2013,

ADOPTS THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Extension of the duration of the Energy Community Treaty

The duration of the Treaty is extended for a period of 10 years.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision enters into force upon its adoption.

Done in Belgrade, 24 October 2013.

For the Ministerial Council,

Z. MIHAJLOVIĆ

---

(1)  Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council under Article 7 of Decision 2006/500/EC, 10.3.2011, COM(2011) 105 final; Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on security of energy supply and international cooperation - The EU Energy Policy: Engaging with Partners beyond Our Borders, 7.9.2011, COM(2011) 539 final; Conclusions of the meeting of 24 November 2011 of the Council of the European Union on strengthening the external dimension of the EU energy policy.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant. By:
    
    
    
    /s/ John R. MaleName:
    
    John R. MaleTitle:
    
    Chairman of the Board andChief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    
    
    /s/ C. Keith SwaneyName:
    
    C. Keith SwaneyTitle:
    
    President, Chief Operating Officerand Treasurer
 Date: November 8, 2004
AGUILAR v. FRYE.

No. COA05-1570.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Moore (04CVS816)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Earl BLACKWELL.

No. 490PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Patricia A. Duffy, Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney Generals, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State.

Marilyn G. Ozer, Chapel Hill, Benjamin Dowling-Sendor, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Timothy Earl Blackwell.

*901*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the order of the Supreme Court of the United States vacating the judgment of this Court in *North Carolina v. Speight,* ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2977, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ (2006) and remanding that cause for further consideration in light of its decision in *Washington v. Recuenco,* ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 2546, 165 L.Ed.2d 466 (2006), the following order is entered:

The State shall have 20 days from the filing of this order to file and serve a supplemental brief with this Court, limited to the questions of whether there was error in this case pursuant to *Washington v. Recuenco* and, if so, whether any error can be found to be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. *State v. Blackwell,*359 N.C. 814, 618 S.E.2d 213 (2005). Defendant may file its brief in response within 20 days after service of the State's brief upon him. Each side will be allowed up to 20 minutes of oral argument.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 17th day of August, 2006.
# Council Decision of 14 April 2011 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean            preferential rules of origin (2013/93/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 14 April 2011

# on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of                        origin                     

# (2013/93/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article                           207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,                        

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

(1)The Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Convention’,                              aims at replacing the protocols on rules of origin currently in force among the countries of the pan-Euro-Mediterranean area.

(2)The participants in the Stabilisation and Association Process have been included in the pan-Euro-Mediterranean system of cumulation                              of origin through the Convention.

(3)On 26 November 2009 the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the EFTA States, the participants in the                              Barcelona Process, the participants in the Stabilisation and Association Process and the Faroe Islands on the Convention.

(4)On 9 December 2009 the text of the Convention was endorsed by the Euromed Trade Ministers at their Conference held in Brussels.

(5)The Convention should be signed and the attached Declaration be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The signing of the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin is hereby approved on behalf                     of the European Union, subject to the conclusion of the said Convention(1).                  

# Article 2U.K.

The Declaration set out in the Annex to this Decision is hereby approved on behalf of the European Union.

# Article 3U.K.

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Convention on behalf of                     the European Union subject to its conclusion and to make the Declaration set out in the Annex to this Decision.                  

# Article 4U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 14 April 2011.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

Fazekas S.                           

## ANNEXU.K.

### DECLARATIONU.K.

The European Union states that the reference to Kosovo prejudges neither the European Union Member States’ position nor any                     European Union position on the status of Kosovo nor the European Union Member States’ right to determine their relations with                     Kosovo.                  

1

The text of the Convention will be published together with the Decision on its conclusion.
In re C.D.A.W.

No. 110A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 11, 2006.

Gary C. Rhodes, Salisbury, for Angela Wright Eagle.

James A. Dickens, Assistant Guilford County Attorney, for Guilford County DSS.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of July 2006 by Appellee (Guardian ad Litem) for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Other (Guardian Ad Litem) shall have up to and including the 24th day of August 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of July 2006."
# Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 312/2013Show full title

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 312/2013 of 31 January 2013 correcting the Hungarian text of Delegated Regulation            (EU) No 244/2012 supplementing Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance            of buildings by establishing a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance            requirements for buildings and building elements (Text with EEA relevance)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 312/2013                     

# of 31 January 2013

# correcting the Hungarian text of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244/2012 supplementing Directive 2010/31/EU of the European                        Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings by establishing a comparative methodology framework for                        calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements                     

# (Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance                           of buildings(1), and in particular Article 5(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)The Hungarian text of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244/2012(2) contains several errors.

(2)Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244/2012 should therefore be corrected accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

Concerns only the Hungarian language version.

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

*The President*                            

José Manuel Barroso                            

1

OJ L 153, 18.6.2010, p. 13.                           

2

OJ L 81, 21.3.2012, p. 18.
STATE v. Terry Alvin HYATT.

No. 402A00-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 28, 2006.

Faith S. Bushnaq, for Terry Alvin Hyatt.

Valerie B. Spalding, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of June 2006 by Defendant to Defer Consideration of Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 28th day of June 2006."