alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT J UNE 4, 2008 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK

*Honora ble Susan C. Buc klew, United States District Judge f or the Middle District of F lorida, sitti ng by desig nation. [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ N o. 07- 1350 8

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ _ D. C. Docket N o. 06-00272 -CV -O DE -1 GEORGE MARK TUGGL E, Plaintiff-Appellee, ve rs us VI CT OR HI LL , C layton Coun ty Sherif f in b othhis of

fi ci al a nd i ndi vid

ua l c ap ac iti es , JOA NNBO RE LL I, De putySherif f, D ef en da nts -Appe llants .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ Appe al f ro m the U nit ed

S ta te s D istri ct

Co urt N orthe rnD istri ct

of G eo rg ia

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ (J un e 4, 200 8 ) Before CA RNE S and MA RCU S, Circuit Judges, and BU CKL EW , District Judge. *2

PE R CU RIA M: This is an appeal of the district court’ s determ ination , on sum m ary j udgm en t, that the Appe llants , S he ri ff V ic tor H ill a nd D ep uty

S he ri ff Joann Bo re lli , w er e not

e nti tle d to a sse rt

the de fe nse of

qua lif ie d im m uni ty . T he standard of r ev ie wf ro m adis tr ic t c ourt’ s de nia l of sum m ar y j udgm en t i s de novo . Kin gs la nd v. Ci ty of Mi am i, 3 82 F.3d 12 20 , 12 25 (11 th Cir . 20 04 ). T he dis tr ic t c ourt f

ound that Appe llants w er e not e nti tle d to a sse rt

the de fe nse of

qua lif ie d im m uni ty , a nd the re fo re w er e not e nti tle d su m

m ar y j udgm en t on any of Appellee Ge orge Mark T uggl e’ s claim s. Appellee’ s com plaint asserted thr ee c la im s a ga ins t Appe llants : f al se a rr es t i n vi ola tio n of the F ourth A m en dm en t, m alicious prosecuti on in v iolation of the Fourth Am endm ent, and retaliatory prosecution in viol ation of the First Am endm ent. T he only issue before this Court is the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s de ci sio n de ny ing Appe llants ’ m oti on f or sum m ar y j udgm en t on the F ourth A m en dm en t c la im s f or f al se a rr es t and m al ic iou s pr ose cu tio n. T he f ac ts o f thi s c as e, vie w ed

in the li ght

m ost f av or ab le to the non -m ovi ng party (here , Appellee Ge orge Mark T uggl e), show that Appellee m ade two short phon e ca lls w ith in a

thr ee m inu te pe ri od, a nd i n e ac h r eque ste d am ee tin g w ith App el la nt Sh eri ff Vic to r Hil l. In on e p ho ne cal l, Ap pe ll ee u se d t he ter m “ sc um ,” an d inthe oth er

use d th e phr as e “ shor

t l il’ ba stard ” in r ef

er en ce to Appe llant3

Sheriff Vic tor Hill. T he district court correc tly found that no rea sonable po lice of fi ce r co uld

ha ve be lie ve d th at

the se f ac ts e sta bli she d arg uable pr oba

ble c au se to arre st the Appellee for

violatin g Georgia’ s harassing ph one calls statute. A cc or din gly , w e af

fi rm the dis tr ic t c ourt’ s de ci sio n th at Appe llants a re not en tit le d to sum

m ar y j udgm en t onthe Appe lle e’ s F ourth A m en dm en t c la im s f or fa lse a rr es t and m al ic iou s pr ose cu tio n. AFFIR MED.
# Council Decision of 28 January 2013 appointing an Italian member of the Committee of the Regions (2013/70/EU)

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 28 January 2013

# appointing an Italian member of the Committee of the Regions

# (2013/70/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following end of the term of office of Mr Francesco MUSOTTO,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following is hereby appointed as member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office,                     which runs until 25 January 2015:                  
          -  Mr Rosario CROCETTA, *Presidente della Regione Siciliana*.                         

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

S. Coveney                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
STATE v. Darrell Wayne MANESS.

No. 402A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 8, 2006.

Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of August 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Prepare Trial Transcript:

"Motion Allowed. Court reporter shall have up to and including the 1st day of October 2006 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel. By order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of August 2006."
# L_2013032EN.01001601.xml

| 1.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 32/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 32/16

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 January 2013

appointing a Belgian member and a Belgian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/68/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Jos CHABERT. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Jos CHABERT.

| (3) | An alternate member’s seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Jean-Luc VANRAES as member of the Committee of the Regions, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

An alternate member’s seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Jean-Luc VANRAES as member of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Mr Jean-Luc VANRAES, Brussels Volksvertegenwoordiger in het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Parlement |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Mr Jean-Luc VANRAES, Brussels Volksvertegenwoordiger in het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Parlement

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Ms Brigitte GROUWELS, Minister van het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Ms Brigitte GROUWELS, Minister van het Brussels Hoofdstedelijk Gewest.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2013.

For the Council

The President

S. COVENEY

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015 (the "Report") of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JAMES C. ZELTER, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





By: /s/ James C. ZelterName: James C. ZelterDate: November 5, 2015
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6548

RONNIE C. GREEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus JOHN PATE, Warden of the Allendale Correctional Institution; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-02-2022-4-26) Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 4, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronnie C. Green, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Ronnie C. Green seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Green has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings in Existing Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:*                     RP22-872-001.                

*Applicants:*                     East Cheyenne Gas Storage, LLC.                

*Description:*                     Compliance filing: ECGS 2022-06-28 Docket No. RP22-872 Compliance to be effective N/A.                

*Filed Date:*                     6/28/22.                

*Accession Number:*                     20220628-5111.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. ET 7/11/22.                

Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date.

                    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (                    *https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.                

                    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.*                     For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Dated: June 29, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-14323 Filed 7-5-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
STATE v. BULLOCK.

No. COA05-470.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (03CRS64722).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Oscar Nunez, t/n Morris Biles, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 841]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered February 25, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of unauthorized use of a vehicle in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based upon legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence that defendant exercised control of a car *(see People v Roby,*39 NY2d 69 [1976]), and did so with knowledge that he lacked consent of the owner *(see Matter of Raquel M.,*99 NY2d 92 [2002]).

The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress his statement to the arresting officers. *Miranda*warnings were not required since defendant was not subject to custodial interrogation *(see People v Huffman,*41 NY2d 29, 33-34 [1976]). Concur— Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
# Commission Decision of 20 September 2013 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of            the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise            and repealing Decision 2008/915/EC (notified under document C(2013) 5915) (Text with EEA relevance) (2013/480/EU) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Decision

# of 20 September 2013

# establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, the values of the Member State                        monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise and repealing Decision 2008/915/EC                     

# (notified under document C(2013) 5915)

# (Text with EEA relevance)

# (2013/480/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Decision (EU) 2018/229 of 12 February 2018 establishing, pursuant to Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament                                 and of the Council, the values of the Member State monitoring system classifications as a result of the intercalibration exercise                                 and repealing Commission Decision 2013/480/EU (notified under document C(2018) 696) (Text with EEA relevance).
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2013 of 22 March 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 282/2013                     

# of 22 March 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 March 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ADAN MAGANA-GARZA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71057

Agency No. A075-112-168

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 12, 2011** 

Before: SCHROEDER, ALARCÓN, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.

Adan Magana-Garza, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. 

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due

FILED

JUL 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-71057

process violations. Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). 

We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review. 

Magana-Garza’s due process claim fails because he did not identify any

error in the agency’s denial of his motion to reopen. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d

1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and prejudice for a petitioner to prevail

on a due process claim). 

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision not to invoke its sua

sponte authority to reopen proceedings under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). See MejiaHernandez v. Holder, 633 F.3d 818, 824 (9th Cir. 2011). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS





We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-36374, 333-31026, 333-90091, 333-77961, 333-46691, 333-28277, 333-48844, 333-55092 and 333-98779) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-51176 and 333-35366) of Pumatech, Inc. of our report dated
August 22, 2002, except as to Note 18, which is as of September 26, 2002, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.





/s/  PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP





San Francisco, California


October 16, 2002
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Additional Names under
                                     State of        which Subsidiary Conducts
    Name of Subsidiary             Incorporation               Business
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                <C>                <C>
Allin Consulting of Pennsylvania,    Pennsylvania        Bank Consulting Services,
Inc.                                                     Allin Consulting
Allin Corporation of California      California          Allin Consulting
Allin Interactive Corporation        Delaware            Allin Interactive
Allin Digital Imaging Corp.          Delaware            Allin Digital
Allin Network Products, Inc.         California          Erie Computer Company
Allin Holdings Corporation           Delaware

</TABLE>
Except as noted above, each subsidiary does business exclusively under its
corporate name, with or without the corporate indicator.



                                                                       Exh. 21-A
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonio
      F. Uccello, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May
      19, 2006





/s/
      Antonio F. Uccello, III


Antonio
      F. Uccello, III


Chief
      Executive Officer