alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013288EN.01006801.xml

| 30.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 288/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 288/68

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2013/533/CFSP

of 28 October 2013

amending Decision 2012/392/CFSP on the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 28 and Articles 42(4) and 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 16 July 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/392/CFSP (1) which expires on 15 July 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 16 July 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/392/CFSP (1) which expires on 15 July 2014.

| (2) | The current financial reference amount covers the period until 31 October 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The current financial reference amount covers the period until 31 October 2013.

| (3) | Decision 2012/392/CFSP should therefore be amended to provide for the financial reference amount for the remaining period until 15 July 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2012/392/CFSP should therefore be amended to provide for the financial reference amount for the remaining period until 15 July 2014.

| (4) | EUCAP Sahel Niger will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

EUCAP Sahel Niger will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the Union’s external action as set out in Article 21 of the Treaty,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 13 of Decision 2012/392/CFSP, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1.   The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Niger for the period from 16 July 2012 to 31 October 2013 shall be EUR 8 700 000.

The financial reference amount to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Niger for the period from 1 November 2013 to 15 July 2014 shall be EUR 6 500 000.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2013.

For the Council

The President

L. LINKEVIČIUS

---

(1)  Council Decision 2012/392/CFSP of 16 July 2012 on the European Union CSDP mission in Niger (EUCAP Sahel Niger) (OJ L 187, 17.7.2012, p. 48).

1

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 302 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Thomas B. Specketer, certify that:
 
 1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q ofMidAmerican Energy Company;2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.

The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.

The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. 
 
 
 Date: November 4, 2004
 /s/ Thomas B. Specketer
 Thomas B. Specketer
 Vice President and Controller
 (chief financial officer)
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5482 

To extend the duty suspension on Allyl isosulfocynate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2008 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on Allyl isosulfocynate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ALLYL ISOSULFOCYNATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.41 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Allyl isosulfocynate) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
|For Immediate ReleaseOctober 20, 2000 |  | CONTACT:Robert Bauer
BlueFire Partners
Phone: 612-344-1016
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------

Stonehaven Announces Dividend Payment on
Class A Preferred Stock

MINNEAPOLISOctober 20, 2000Stonehaven (AMEX: RPP), a Minneapolis-based real estate company,
today announced that its Board of Directors has declared the semi-annual dividend of 47.5 cents per share of Class A Preferred Stock, payable November 15, 2000, to
shareholders of record on November 1, 2000.

Certain matters discussed within this press release may be deemed to be forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Although Stonehaven Realty Trust believes the expectations reflected in such forward looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be
attained. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from Stonehaven's expectations include changes in local or national economic or real estate conditions and other risks detailed
from time to time in the company's SEC reports and filings, including its S-4 and S-11 Registration Statements as well as its annual report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and periodic reports on Form 8-K. The Company assumes no obligation to update or supplement forward looking statements that become
untrue because of subsequent events.

#
# #

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TERRY ANDERSON,

Petitioner

v.

KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, SECRETARY

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF

PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 20 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of March , 2017, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED , the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” is DENIED , and the

Motion to Dismiss for Mootness is DISMISSED AS MOOT

.
STATE of North Carolina v. Richard Earl HARPER.

No. 585P03-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Richard Earl Harper, Pro Se.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, William David McFadyen, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 31st day of March 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 2nd day of December 2005 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Craven County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 26th day of January 2006."
KFS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0432

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

WILLIAM DARRELL MILLER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including April 21, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 13 2020

03/13/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0432
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5406 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5406

     To suspend temporarily the duty on over-the-range microwaves.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2008

 Mr. Sullivan introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on over-the-range microwaves.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OVER-THE-RANGE MICROWAVES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902._._         Microwave oven and  1.8%         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          range hood                                                         31/2011.......
                          combinations with
                          oven capacity
                          exceeding 45.0
                          liters (provided
                          for in subheading
                          8516.50.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Certification of CEO



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of KH Funding Company (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert L. Harris, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated November 14, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    Robert L. Harris                               
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Robert L. Harris President and Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such
Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 14, 2013

jam 

# Order

Clerk November 14, 2013

1 47996 ( 21 )

MAURICE JONES

,

Plaint iff

- Appellant,

v SC: 1 47996

COA: 314530

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

and MUSKEGON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY

WARDEN

,

Defendant s

- Appellee s

.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be

liable for filing fees.

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall p ay to the

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $ 51 .00, shall submit a copy of this order

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of

$3 24 .00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full.

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
THOMAS v. BLENDINGER.

COA05-1629.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (04CVS9003)

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of B&G Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Cantwell, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ Robert C. Cantwell  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Cantwell      |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 1, 2006        |

 

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.*

----
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 17

- 00233

- CR

Joe Angel Lopez

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 4

o f Tarrant County (1455366D )

July 12, 2018

Opinion by Just ice Pittman

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Mark T. Pittman

_________________ Justice Mark T. Pittman
Jo Ann Outlaw KORNEGAY, Plaintiff v. Bonnie R. ROBINSON, Administratrix of the Estate of Byard G. Kornegay, Jimmy B. Kornegay, Byard G. Kornegay, Jr., Gerald Clay Kornegay, Ricky Thomas Kornegay, Linda Kay K. Lane, and Mary Hazel K. Manuel, Defendants.

No. 153A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Richard L. Burrows, Wallace, J. Gates Harris, Red Springs, for Ricky Kornegay & Manuel.

W. Carroll Turner, Mount Olive, for Jimmy B. Kornegay.

Thomas M. Wart, for Byard, Gerald and Linda.

John Turner Walston, Henry C. Smith, for Jo Ann Kornegay.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 26th day of April 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 22

- 00237

- CV
Rita DIAZ and A/N/F of Roxanna Gonzalez, Rita Gonzalez and Rolando Gonzalez Jr., Appellant

v. Gregorio LOPEZ , Appellee
From the 406th Judicial District Court , Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018CVA000591

- D4 Honorable David E. Garcia , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Beth Watkins , Justice
Delivered and Filed: June 29, 2022
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION On March 23, 2018, Appellee Gregorio Lopez filed an original petition for bill of review in a negli gence action, requesting a default judgment be set aside or vacated. On April 22, 2022, the trial court signed an order granting Lopez’s petition for bill of review. That same day, Appellant Rita Diaz filed a notice of appeal, stating she intends to appeal the trial court’s order granting Lopez’s bill of review.
In Jordan v. Jordan , the Texas Supreme Court held a trial court’s order granting a bill of review, but not disposing of the case on the merits, is interlocutory and not appealable. 907 S.W.2d04

- 22

- 00237

- CV

- 2

- 471, 4 72 (Tex. 1995). Thus, the Supreme Court held the court of appeals lacked jurisdiction over the appeal. See id. ; see also Kiefer v. Touris , 197 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2006). In this case, the clerk’s record reflects the trial court granted the bill of review , thus setting aside the default judgment. However, nothing in the clerk’s record reflects the trial court entered a final judgment disposing of the case on the merits. It therefore appear s the trial court’s order was interlocutory and not appealable. See Jordan , 907 S.W.2d at 472. On May 17, 2022, this court ordered Diaz to show cause in writing by June 1, 2022 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In lieu of a response, Diaz filed a notice of nonsuit stating the “[a]ppeal is no t a proper vehicle for this matter.” N othing in Diaz ’s notice establishes jurisdiction in this court over the appea l

. Because the trial court’s order is interlocutory and not appealable, see Jordan , 907 S.W.2d at 472 , w e dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM
# Commission Implementing Decision of 7 November 2013 adopting a second updated list of sites of Community importance for the            Steppic biogeographical region (notified under document C(2013) 7352) (2013/736/EU) (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 7 November 2013

# adopting a second updated list of sites of Community importance for the Steppic biogeographical region

# (notified under document C(2013) 7352)

# (2013/736/EU) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/15 of 14 December 2018 adopting the third update of the list of sites of Community                                 importance for the Steppic biogeographical region (notified under document C(2018) 8522).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000928950 
<NAME> CHASE INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,806
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,498
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,304
<INVENTORY>                                     59,640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,596
<PP&E>                                          93,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 212,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,302
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,059
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212,554
<SALES>                                        125,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,118
<CGS>                                          106,641
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  106,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,239
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 981
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,257
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,278
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,979
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,979
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
        

</TABLE>