alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- 350 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports POPE v . DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES Cite as 311 Neb. 350

Colt M. Pope, appellant, v. Department of Motor Vehicles of the State of Nebraska, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed April 15, 2022. No. S-21-206.

supplemental opinion Appeal from the District Court for Clay County: Stephen R. Illingworth , Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. T. Charles James, of Langvardt, Valle & James, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant.Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Milissa JohnsonWiles for appellee.
Heavican , C.J., Miller

- Lerman , Cassel , Stacy , Funke , Papik , and Freudenberg , JJ.
Per Curiam. This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Colt M. Pope, concerning our opinion in Pope v. Department of Motor Vehicles , 310 Neb. 971, 969 N.W.2d 903 (2022). We overrule the motion, but modify the opinion as follows: In the analysis section, under the subheading “OTHER ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR,” we modify the fourth para

graph to add as the final sentence the following: “We make Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/03/2022 09:10 AM CDT- 351 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports POPE v . DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES Cite as 311 Neb. 350 no comment on any prohibitions or obligations under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-914(6) (Reissue 2014), as Pope has not assigned as error, nor has he argued he was prejudiced by, any purported violation of that statute.” The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.
#### In the Matter of Kevin McTigue, Appellant, v Town of Clarkstown et al., Respondents.

[798 NYS2d 915]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the respondents’ determination dated November 24, 2003, which denied the petitioner benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 207-c, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland *375County (Bergerman, J.), dated September 23, 2004, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, he was not entitled to a due process hearing since his General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits were neither revoked nor terminated *(see Matter of Cole-Hatchard v Sherwood,*309 AD2d 933 [2003]; *cf. Matter of Gamma v Bloom, 274*AD2d 14 [2000]). Furthermore, there was a rational basis for the respondents’ determination to deny the petitioner’s request for General Municipal Law § 207-c benefits for the two days in question, November 3, 2003, and November 4, 2003. Therefore, the determination was neither arbitrary nor capricious, and will not be disturbed *(see Matter of Cole-Hatchard v Sherwood, supra; Matter of Miele v Town of Clarkstown,*299 AD2d 362 [2002]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Skelos, JJ., concur.
Amend No 2 to Severance Agreement



 






EXHIBIT 10.56




Amendment No. 2 to the Severance Agreement




between Seabulk International, Inc. and [__________________]




Dated as of April 18, 2005




     This Amendment to the Severance Agreement by and between Seabulk International, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and [___] (“Executive”), dated as of
[___] (the “Agreement”), is entered into as of the 18th day of April, 2005.



     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company authorized
this amendment on April 18, 2005;



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and the mutual benefits provided
in the Agreement, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and
Executive hereby amend the Agreement as set forth below:



     1. The following new subparagraph (c) shall be added to Paragraph 3 of the Agreement:



     “(c) Pay Executive a lump sum cash payment in respect of his accrued but unused vacation days
(if any) for the year of termination on or before the fifth day after the last day of Executive’s
employment with the Company.”



     2. The following new subparagraph (e) shall be added to Paragraph 4 of the Agreement:




     “(e) Pay Executive a lump sum cash payment in respect of his accrued but unused
vacation days (if any) for the year of termination on or before the fifth day after
the last day of Executive’s employment with the Company. Further, if Executive’s
employment with the Company terminates prior to the payment of incentive awards
under the Company’s Management Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (“MAICP”) for the
2005 calendar year, the Company shall also pay Executive, on or before the fifth day
after the last day of Executive’s employment with the Company, a lump sum cash
payment equal to 100% of the 2005 maximum incentive award specified for Executive
under the MAICP multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the number
of days Executive was employed by the Company during calendar year 2005 and the
denominator of which shall be 365.”



     3. As so amended, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.



 









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Amendment No. 2 to be duly
executed and delivered as of the day and year first written above.



	 	 	 
	 

	 	SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
	 
	 	 
	 

	 	 
	EXECUTIVE

	 	By:







2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TERRY ANDERSON,

Petitioner

v.

KIMBERLY A. BARKLEY, SECRETARY 

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF 

PROBATION AND PAROLE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 20 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2017, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, the “Petition for Writ of Mandamus” is DENIED, and the 

Motion to Dismiss for Mootness is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Exhibit 10.1 Laon Extension Agreement





CONVERTIBLE NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT







Pursuant to that certain Convertible Note dated as of July 10, 2013, by and between Domain Media, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Domain Media Corp., (the “Company” or “Borrower”) and Chris Kern and/or his affiliates and assigns (the “Holder” or “Lender”), and having a three (3) year term being due and payable as of July 10, 2016, the parties hereto agree to extend the maturity due date of the Convertible Note for one (1) year to be due and payable on or before July 10, 2017.  As of July 10, 2016, the current approximate balance of the Convertible Note is $302,000.




All of the terms and conditions of the Convertible Note shall remain in full force and effect, and this Extension Agreement does not waive, amend or alter any other terms or conditions therein. 

Agreed & Accepted:




Company: Domain Media Corp.

Holder: Chris Kern




/s/ Chris Kern                                    

/s/ Chris Kern                                    

Authorized Signature

Mr. Chris Kern




Print Name: Chris Kern

Date: July 10, 2016

Title: President & Director

Date: July 10, 2016
# L_2013047EN.01001801.xml

| 20.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/18

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 140/2013

of 18 February 2013

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pa de Pagès Català (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 entered into force on 3 January 2013. It repealed and replaced Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (2).

| (2) | Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pa de Pagès Català’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Pursuant to Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pa de Pagès Català’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (3).

| (3) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 February 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

2

(3)  
  OJ C 128, 3.5.2012, p. 14.

3

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products and foodstuffs listed in Part I of Annex I to Regulation Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012:

Class 2.4.   Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares

SPAIN

Pa de Pagès Català (PGI)

---
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Bernard Liautaud, certify that:
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March31, 2004 of Business Objects S.A.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting.     Date: May 4, 2004 By: /s/ Bernard Liautaud      Bernard Liautaud   Chairman of the Board and   Chief Executive Officer
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________ _____________
No. 1D18-4789

________________ _____________
C ARIN E LAINE M AXEY , Petitioner,

v.

J AMES M ICHAEL D UNKEL and K

AREN M C C LAIN D UNKEL , Respondents.

________________ _____________

Petition for Writ of Prohib ition—Original Jurisdiction.

February 8, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for writ of prohib ition is denied on the merits.

B ILBREY , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concur.

________________ _____________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fl a. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

________________ _____________2 Michael M. Naughton, Jack sonville, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondents.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, James C. Mastandrea, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of Paragon
Real Estate Equity and Investment Trust, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Paragon Real Estate Equity and
Investment Trust (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the Registrant and we have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the Registrants board of trustees (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 6, 2005 By:
    
    
    
    /s/ James C. MastandreaJames C. Mastandrea
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           14809
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            2491
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     120782
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           10655
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             10655
<LOANS>                                         543897
<ALLOWANCE>                                       5194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  712597
<DEPOSITS>                                      404744
<SHORT-TERM>                                    217577
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               7994
<LONG-TERM>                                      33687
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                       38539
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  712597
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  11822
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1920
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    98
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 13840
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                5196
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9195
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             4645
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      210
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   3393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1558
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1558
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1028
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.31
<LOANS-NON>                                       1386
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   5000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  5004
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       32
<RECOVERIES>                                        11
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 5194
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              5194
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           5166


</TABLE>
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________ 

Case No. 5D23-406

LT Case No. 16-2012-CF-227

_____________________________ 

DEVON MITCHELL, 

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________ 

3.850 appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. 

Mark Borello, Judge. 

W. Charles Fletcher, of Law Office of W. Charles Fletcher,

Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Robert Charles Lee, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

September 26, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

LAMBERT, EISNAUGLE, and MACIVER, JJ., concur. 
2 

_____________________________ 

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331. 

_____________________________
STATE v. WALTERS.

COA06-230.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from New Hanover (03CRS17935, 03CRS17936, 03CRS17938, 03CRS17939, 03CRS17940)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brian F. Lavin, President and Chief Executive Officer of NTS RealtyCapital, Inc., the managing general partner of NTS Realty Holdings LimitedPartnership (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.                                       The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,2010 (the “Report”), which accompanies this certificate, fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | August 11,  2010                                |     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Name:  | /s/  *Brian F. Lavin*                                | * * |
|   | Brian  F. Lavin                                      |     |
| Title: | President  and Chief Executive Officer of            |     |
|   | NTS  Realty Capital, Inc., the Managing General |     |
|   | Partner  of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership  |     |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
ALVARADO v. TYSON FOODS, INC.

No. COA05-1623.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 19, 2006.

Certification Date January 8, 2007.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #371596).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed and remanded.
NELLO L. TEER COMPANY v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

No. 128P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Fred Lamar, Special Deputy Attorney General, for N.C. Dept. of Transportation.

Patrick A. Genzler, Norfolk, VA, Norman W. Shearin, Kitty Hawk, David P. Ferrell, Raleigh, for Nello L. Teer Co.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th day of March 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."