alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew
      A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







*/s/
                Matthew A. Jones*Matthew
                A. JonesChief
                Financial OfficerAugust
                15, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                             Exhibit (10)(ii)(A)

Annual Performance Incentive Plan - Additional Information

The Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company (the "Committee") establishes annual Company performance objectives
under the Company's Restated Annual Incentive Performance Plan, as amended (the
APIP), the Company's annual cash incentive compensation plan for executive
officers, and the Stock Incentive Plan. The Committee sets a threshold and a
target level for each measure of Company performance, which will determine the
cash amount payable under the APIP to an executive officer. If Company
performance on a measure is below the threshold level, no incentive payment will
be made for that measure. The Committee assigns each executive officer a
percentage of base pay (targeted amount) used to calculate benefits under the
APIP.

The Company's performance objectives under the APIP for the fiscal year ending
May 27, 2006 (FY 2006) are specified levels of net sales and operating income
before income taxes (excluding nonrecurring items at the discretion of the
Committee). Sixty percent of the participant's award is based on net sales and
forty percent of the award is based on operating income before income taxes. The
target amounts for FY 2006 are 100% of base pay for the chief executive officer
and ranged from 50% to 65% of base pay for the other executive officers. Under
the APIP for FY 2006, an executive officer can receive from 0% to 200% of the
applicable targeted amount, depending on the Company's actual net sales and
operating income before income taxes compared to the target levels.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Registrant.



| |  |                         |  | 
| |  | ----------------------- |  | 
| |  |                        
| |  | /s/ RICHARD L. PETEKA   |  | 
| |  | Name: Richard L. Peteka |  | 
| |  | Date: November 3, 2011  |  | 



64
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,916,695
<SECURITIES>                                   973,110
<RECEIVABLES>                                  500,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (31,280)
<INVENTORY>                                     25,789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,551,095
<PP&E>                                         810,790
<DEPRECIATION>                               (143,307)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,440,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,139,640
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,055
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,034,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,440,819
<SALES>                                      2,788,570
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,788,570
<CGS>                                        1,710,808
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,710,808
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,761,862
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             145,835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,577,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,577,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,577,229
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)
        

</TABLE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






Board of Directors
SE Financial Corp.

We have  reviewed the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet of SE Financial
Corp. and subsidiary as of April 30, 2006, the related  consolidated  statements
of income for the  three-month  and  six-month  periods ended April 30, 2006 and
2005,  the  consolidated  statement of changes in  stockholders'  equity for the
six-month  period ended April 30, 2006, and the  consolidated  statement of cash
flows  for  the  six-month   periods  ended  April  30,  2006  and  2005.  These
consolidated  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of the  Company's
management.

We conducted  our review in  accordance  with  standards  of the Public  Company
Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States).  A review of  interim  financial
information consists principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with the  standards  of the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board,  the
objective  of which is the  expression  of an opinion  regarding  the  financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with U.S generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in  accordance  with the  standards of the Public
Company  Accounting  Oversight Board (United States),  the consolidated  balance
sheet as of October 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes  in  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented  herein);  and in our report  dated  December 9, 2005 we  expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



/s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
June 9, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Apollo Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017 (the “Report”), I, James C. Zelter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory W. Hunt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                       
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ JAMES C. ZELTERJames C. ZelterChief Executive OfficerAugust 4, 2017


/s/ GREGORY W. HUNTGregory W. HuntChief Financial Officer and TreasurerAugust 4, 2017
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

I, John H. Steadman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Chase Industries
Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ending June
30, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d))
and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 14, 2002


                                    /s/ John H. Steadman
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: John H. Steadman
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2013022EN.01002301.xml

| 25.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 22/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 22/23

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 22 January 2013

appointing a German alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/61/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the appointment of Ms Dagmar MÜHLENFELD as member (3), |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the appointment of Ms Dagmar MÜHLENFELD as member (3),

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Ms Helma OROSZ, Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Dresden. |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Helma OROSZ, Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Dresden.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 22 January 2013.

For the Council

The President

M. NOONAN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 287, 18.10.2012, p. 11.

3

---
December 17, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

UWAKWE C. OKO AND VICTORIA I. OKO, Appellants

NO. 14-15-00505-CV V.

TONY ALI, JUNIOR PROPERTIES, LLC, AND EVERBANK, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order 

signed by the court below on June 4, 2015. Having considered the motion and 

found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellants, Uwakwe C. Oko and Victoria I. Oko.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
STATE v. ROSE.

No. COA05-994.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 2, 2006.

Certification Date May 22, 2006.

Appeal from Robeson (03CRS12260).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. OGLESBY.

No. COA04-1576.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 5, 2005.

Certification Date July 25, 2005.

Appeal from the Forsyth (01CRS60765, 01CRS60766, 01CRS61029, 01CRS36365).

Case without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Jose Amilpas v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 14

- 00053

- CR

Trial court case number: 1334791

Trial court: 174th District Court of Harris County

Thi s appeal was previously abated for appointment of counsel following the death of

appellant’s previous attorney. We are in receipt of a supplemental clerk’s record and reporter’s

record of the abatement hearing stating that Daucie Schindler has been appoin ted to represent

appellant. This case is reinstated and placed on our active docket.

The clerk’s record and reporter’s record have previously been filed. Appellant’s brief is

due within 30 days of the date of this order. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(a).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 3, 2014
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing WorldWide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Marvin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                       /S/ JAMES MARVIN
                                       -----------------------
                                       James Marvin
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       Date: August 7, 2006


                                       26
NEILL GRADING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. David B. LINGAFELT and Newton Conover Communications, Inc.

No. 112PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Mark J. Prak, Raleigh, Mack Sperling, Greensboro, Charles E. Coble, Raleigh, for Lingafelt, et al.

*542Stephen M. Thomas, Hickory, for Neill Grading & Construction.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendants on the 22nd day of February 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Plaintiff, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."

Upon consideration of the alternative petition filed on the 22nd day of February 2005 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."

Defendants shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
Exhibit 4.9  


FORM 51-102F3

MATERIAL CHANGE REPORT  


Item 1        Name and Address of Company  


HudBay
Minerals Inc.

6 Adelaide Street East

Suite 300

Toronto, Ontario M5C 1H6 


Item 2        Date of Material Change  



June 23,
2005. 


Item 3        News Release  


A
press release concerning this material change was issued on June 23, 2005 through the Canadian disclosure network. 


Item 4        Summary of Material Changes  


HudBay
Minerals Inc. ("HudBay") announced that it had completed its previously announced private placement of flow-through common shares for aggregate gross proceeds to HudBay of
$7,500,060. 


HudBay
also announced that its operating subsidiary, Hudson Bay Mining and Smelting Co., Limited ("HBMS"), had received a commitment from Scotia Capital to establish an operating credit
facility of $25 million which, conditionally, may be increased to $50 million. 


Item 5        Full Description of Material Change  


HudBay
Minerals Inc. (the "Company") announced that it had completed its previously announced private placement of flow-through common shares for aggregate gross proceeds to
HudBay of $7,500,060. 


HudBay
issued 2,193,000 flow-through common shares at a price of $3.42 per share pursuant to the brokered private placement through a syndicate of investment dealers led by GMP
Securities Ltd. 


Proceeds
from the offering will be used for exploration and development on HudBay's extensive exploration lands in the Flin Flon Greenstone Belt. The private placement was the second stage in the
financing of a planned annual exploration program of up to $10 million. 







 

HudBay
also announced that its operating subsidiary, HBMS had received a commitment from Scotia Capital to establish an operating credit facility of $25 million which, conditionally, may be
increased to $50 million. The facility, which will be guaranteed by HudBay, is secured by HBMS receivables and inventory and is subject to customary conditions. 


"We
are pleased to partner with Scotia Capital in this arrangement, which provides additional financial strength and flexibility to HudBay," said Peter Jones, President and CEO of HudBay. 


HudBay
Minerals Inc. is an integrated mining and metal producing company that operates mines and concentrators in northern Manitoba and Saskatchewan and a metal processing complex in Flin Flon,
Manitoba. The Company also operates a zinc oxide production facility in Brampton, Ontario and the former producing mines of Balmat in New York State and Gays River in Nova Scotia that are being
evaluated for re-opening. 


Item 6        Reliance on subsection 7.1(2) or (3) of National Instrument 51-102  



N/A. 


Item 7        Omitted Information  


N/A. 


Item 8        Executive Officer  


Brian
D. Gordon, Vice President and General Counsel of HudBay, at (204) 949-4269. 


Item 9        Date of Report  


July 4,
2005. 



	 	 	HUDBAY MINERALS INC.
	



	 	 	 
	 	 	By:	/s/ Brian D. Gordon
 Brian D. Gordon

Vice President and General Counsel




2
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing Worldwide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Winzkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/ MICHAEL WINZKOWSKI
---------------------------
Michael Winzkowski
Chief Executive Officer

May 24, 2006

                                       26
STATE of North Carolina v. Larry Darnell ANDERSON.

No. 249P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for Larry D. Anderson.

Elizabeth J. Weese, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Parker, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 627 S.E.2d 686.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 8th day of May 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of May 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."