alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013032EN.01001701.xml

| 1.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 32/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 32/17

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 January 2013

appointing a Czech alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/69/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Czech Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr David RATH, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr David RATH,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as alternate member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Mr Václav NOVOTNÝ, radní hl. města Prahy. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Václav NOVOTNÝ, radní hl. města Prahy.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2013.

For the Council

The President

S. COVENEY

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10905

Conference Calendar

 

CHARLES EDWARD MOORE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DOUGLAS HUGH SCHOPMEYER,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:98-CV-1379-P

- - - - - - - - - -

June 16, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Moore, Texas prisoner # 824496, appeals from the

dismissal of his lawsuit filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983

against state public defender Douglas Hugh Schopmeyer as

frivolous. Moore first argues that the district court erred by

denying his motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The

district court generally should not dismiss a pro se complaint

without giving the plaintiff an opportunity to amend, but even a

“pro se complaint must contain specific facts supporting its 
No. 98-10905

-2-

 

1 The first strike is the dismissal of the complaint as

frivolous in Moore v. Boy, No. 3:98CV680 (N.D. Tex. May 6, 1998). 

The second strike is the district court’s dismissal as frivolous

of the complaint in the instant case. Moore v. Schopmeyer, No.

3:98CV1379-P (N.D. Tex. Jul. 28, 1998). 

conclusions.” Jacquez v. Procunier, 801 F.2d 789, 793 (5th Cir.

1986)(citations omitted). Because Moore failed to submit an

amended complaint and the allegations contained in his motion to

amend would also have been subject to dismissal as frivolous, any

error committed by the district court in denying Moore’s motion

was not reversible error.

Moore also contends that the district court abused its

discretion by dismissing his lawsuit as frivolous. The district

court may dismiss an IFP complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) if it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. 

Siglar v. Hightower, 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). We

review such a dismissal for an abuse of discretion. Id.

Examination of the record and Moore’s appellate brief indicates

that his complaint lacked an arguable basis in law or fact. The

district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing it as

frivolous.

Moore’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir.

R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal as frivolous counts as a

“strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We inform Moore

that because he has now accumulated three strikes,1 he may not

proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is 
No. 98-10905

-3-

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(g).

Moore’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. 

See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982).

APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) BAR IMPOSED.
LANE v. BEALL'S INC.

No. COA05-578.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 1, 2006.

Certification Date August 21, 2006.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #220208).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed in part; remanded in part.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Bernard Liautaud, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Business Objects S.A. on Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Business Objects S.A.



By:

/s/    BERNARD
LIAUTAUDBernard Liautaud Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer




I, James R.
Tolonen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Business Objects S.A. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Business
Objects S.A.



By:

/s/    JAMES R.
TOLONENJames R. Tolonen Chief Financial Officer and Senior Group Vice
President
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2013 of 14 November 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2013                     

# of 14 November 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM U.S. 
FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          31,188
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      114
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,934
<PP&E>                                             324
<DEPRECIATION>                                      32
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,189
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           18,477 
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           415 <F1>
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,105
<SALES>                                          1,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,292
<CGS>                                            8,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,591)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,591)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,591)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.75)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.75)<F2>
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES 3,186,280 SHARES OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK THAT ARE REDEEMABLE UNDER
CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES BY THE COMPANY FOR REASONS NOT UNDER THE COMPANY'S
CONTROL.
<F2>PER SHARE AMOUNTS ARE DETERMINED BY DIVIDING LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON
STOCKHOLDERS BY WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING.  WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
INCLUDE REDEEMABLE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING.  LOSS APPLICABLE TO COMMON
STOCKHOLDERS REPRESENTS NET LOSS ADJUSTED FOR DIVIDENDS ACCRETED ON THE
REDEEMABLE PREFERRED STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Carol K. Nelson, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Lars H. Johnson,
Chief Financial Officer of Cascade Financial Corporation (the "Company"), each
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1.  The Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,
    2003 (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a)
    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
    and

2.  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 and is
not being filed as part of this quarterly report.

Date: November 12, 2003

                                                /s/ Carol K. Nelson
                                                ---------------------------
                                                By: Carol K. Nelson
                                                    President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer

                                                /s/ Lars H. Johnson
                                                -------------------------------
                                                By: Lars H. Johnson
                                                    Executive Vice President
                                                    and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1997
<CASH>                                       3,685,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,180,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   300,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,715,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,428,000
<PP&E>                                      54,939,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,746,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              73,446,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,518,000
<BONDS>                                      2,147,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,400
<OTHER-SE>                                  57,237,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                73,446,000
<SALES>                                     43,243,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,243,000
<CGS>                                       26,608,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,608,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,248,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,878,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             138,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,563,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   948,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,615,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,615,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.30
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. MYERS.

No. COA05-1432.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS52932, 04CRS52933).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# L_2014008EN.01003201.xml

| 11.1.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/32

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision 2013/114/EU of 1 March 2013 establishing the guidelines for Member States on calculating renewable energy from heat pumps from different heat pump technologies pursuant to Article 5 of Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 62 of 6 March 2013
  )

On pages 32 and 33, in point 3.6, ‘Default values for SPF and Qusable for heat pumps’ tables 1 and 2, the values for HHP (annual equivalent heat pump hours) for reversible (using aerothermal energy) air to air and air to water heat pumps operating in ‘warm’ climates, line 3 and 4 respectively of column 3:

usable

HP

for:

‘480’,

read:

‘120’;

for:

‘470’,

read:

‘120’;

on page 35, in point 4, ‘Calculation example’, the ‘annual equivalent heat pump hours’ (HHP) example for the water to water heat pump in the third row, penultimate column:

HP

for:

‘
  2 010
  ’,

read:

‘
  2 070
  ’.

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Sangria Devonne NOBLE.

No. 37P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Duncan McCormick, Lillington, for Sangria Noble.

Jane Oliver, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of January 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Office of Justice Programs

          - [OJP (OJJDP) Docket No. 1803]

# AGENCY:

Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (“Council”), Office of Justice Programs, Department of Justice.

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal.

# SUMMARY:

Notice that the charter of the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention has been renewed.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Visit the website for the Coordinating Council at                         *www.juvenilecouncil.gov*                         or contact Julie Herr, Designated Federal Official (DFO), Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP), by telephone at (202) 598-6885 (not a toll-free number) or via email:                         *julie.herr@ojp.usdoj.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This                     **Federal Register**                     notice notifies the public that the Charter of the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention has been renewed in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Section 14(a)(1). The renewal Charter was renewed on June 28, 2022. One can obtain a copy of the renewal Charter by accessing the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention's website at                     *www.juvenilecouncil.gov.*

Julie Herr,

Designated Federal Official, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2022-14848 Filed 7-12-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-18-P
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1217/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1217/2013 of 28 November 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1217/2013                     

# of 28 November 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.