alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          113605
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1990370
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1366145
<INVENTORY>                                      72158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                662732
<PP&E>                                         1349931
<DEPRECIATION>                                  247143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2115931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2996321
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         11241
<OTHER-SE>                                      800052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2115931
<SALES>                                        6345837
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6498309
<CGS>                                          1269168
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5720945
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                816574
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               80232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 697132
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    697132
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6287** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. THEODORE HOWZE, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 3:07

- cv - 00184

- GCM; 3:98

- cr - 00299

- GCM

- 1 )

Submitted : June 24, 2010 Decided: July 21, 2010

Before KING and SHEDD , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Theodore Howze, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Theodore Howze, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2009 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this sta ndard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When t he district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Howze has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

SASCHA M. HUFER and SPECTRUM REALTY, LLC , Appellant s ,

v.

TIERA DEL REY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. , Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 61

[ October 19, 2017 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Thomas H. Barkdull, III , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2014

- CA

005557

- XXXX

- MB

.
Ronald M. Gaché and Scott A. Simon of Shapiro, Fishman & Gaché

, LLP, Boca Raton, for appellants.

Robert Rivas of Sachs Sax Caplan, P.L., Tallahassee, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN , C ONNER and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
TYRONE WOODSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5630

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 21, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James O. Shelfer , Judge

.

Jeffrey E. Lewis, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Michael J. Titus,

Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee . Tyrone Woodson, pro se , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence in all respects but

one. We reverse the imposition of a $1,050 fine and a $52.50 surcharge, neither of2 which was pronounced at the sentencing hearing. See Nix v. State , 84 So. 3d 424

(Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Williams v. State , 82 So. 3d 186 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012). As in

Nix , “ [o]n remand, the trial court may reimpose the fine and surcharge after

providing notice to Appellant and following the proper procedure.” 84 So. 3d at 426.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, and REMANDED.

ROBERTS, C.J., and JAY and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
# Council Decision of 25 November 2013 appointing a Latvian member and two Latvian alternate members of the Committee of the            Regions (2013/699/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Council Decision

# of 25 November 2013

# appointing a Latvian member and two Latvian alternate members of the Committee of the Regions

# (2013/699/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Latvian Government,

Whereas:

(1)On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU(1) and 2010/29/EU(2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January                              2015.

(2)A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Guntars KRIEVIŅŠ.

(3)An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Viktors GLUHOVS. An alternate member’s                              seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Jānis VĪTOLIŅŠ as member of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which                     runs until 25 January 2015:                  

as member:
                -  Mr Jānis VĪTOLIŅŠ, *First Deputy Chairman of Ventspils City Council*                                   

and

as alternate members:
                -  Mr Gunārs ANSIŅŠ, *Deputy Chairman of Liepāja City Council*                                   
                -  Ms Olga VEIDIŅA, *Chairman of the Social Issues Committee of Rīga City Council*.                                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 25 November 2013.

*For the Council*                            

*The President*                            

D. Pavalkis                            

1

OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.                           

2

OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.
STATE v. Thomas Lee JOHNSON, Sr.

No. 152P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Anne Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of March 2006 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of April 2006."
In the Matter of E.F.S., Jr.

No. 285P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 21, 2006.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of June 2006 by Respondent for Extension of Time to File Response:

*471"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of June 2006."
STATE v. TORRES.

No. COA04-1578.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Buncombe (03CRS62239, 03CRS62240, 03CRS62241, 03CRS62242).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in defendant's trial; Vacated and remended for resentencing.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00530- CV

Terr y Christopher Boun ds an d Diana B ound s, Appellan ts
v. Boun ds an d Pinto Mar keting, Inc. d/ b/a Canyon Lake Visitors Bureau and f/ k/a PBC Mar keting Com pany; Austrends, In c.; and Randy O sherow, Trustee of the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of Terry C hristopher Boun ds, App ellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 419 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 3-0 0213 1, H ONO RAB LE GISELA D. TRI ANA, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The parties have filed an ag ree d motion, signe d by counsel for all parties, informing this Court that they have rea ched a settlement of the underly ing dispute, and reque sting that we abate this appea l pending approva l of the settlement by the United States Ba nkruptcy Court. We will abate the appeal unt il Marc h 3, 2014. I f t he parties’ settl ement is approve d, th ey ar e instructed to file a motion to reinstate and dismiss the appea l in acc ordanc e with the settlement agre ement. I f the parties have not finalized the settlement by Marc h 3, 2014, they are i n s t ru cted to file a repor t informing this Court as to the status of the appea l a nd, if nec essar

y , reque sting a

n extension of the abate ment.__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Goodwin Ba nkruptcy Filed: January

22, 2014

2
#### Harold Bonime, Respondent, v Discount Funding Associates, Inc., et al., Appellants.

[799 NYS2d 418]

In a putative class action to recover damages for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 USC § 227), the defendants separately appeal, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (G. Aronin, J.), dated October 6, 2003, as denied those branches of their respective motions which were pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the class action allegations and dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs, the branches of the defendants’ respective motions which were pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the class action allegations and dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them are granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

For the reasons set forth in *Rudgayzer & Gratt v Cape Canaveral Tour and Travel*(22 AD3d 148 [2005] [decided herewith]), a class action may not be maintained in this case *(see*CPLR 901 [b]). In light of our determination, the defendants’ remaining contentions are academic. S. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Lifson, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy. 

      ( print page 49596)    

# ACTION:

Notice To Delete Systems of Records; N05822-1 Yokusuka Prison Health and Comfort Items. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy is deleting a system of records notice from its existing inventory of records systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

# DATES:

This proposed action will be effective without further notice on September 23, 2005 unless comments are received which result in a contrary determination. 

# ADDRESSES:

Department of the Navy, PA/FOIA Policy Branch, Chief of Naval Operations, (DNS-36), 2000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Doris Lama at (202) 685-6545. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Department of the Navy systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                 

The specific changes to the records system being amended are set forth below followed by the notice, as amended, published in its entirety. The proposed amendments are not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report. 

Dated: August 17, 2005. 

Jeanette Owings-Ballard, 

OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. 

## N05822-1 

### System name:

Yokusuka Prison Health and Comfort Items (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10782). 

### Reason: 

The Yokusuka Prison Health and Comfort Program has been discontinued and all files have been destroyed. 

[FR Doc. 05-16672 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-U
STATE v. WILLIAMS.

No. COA05-1024.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (02CRS200469, 02CRS200470, 02CRS200485).

Case without published opinion. No error.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1256/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1256/2013 of 4 December 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1256/2013                     

# of 4 December 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S 1997 FIRST QUARTER REPORT ON FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,552
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,960
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,281
<INVENTORY>                                     51,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,173
<PP&E>                                          96,659
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,278
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      81,129
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,984
<SALES>                                        126,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               126,074
<CGS>                                          107,922
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  107,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,299
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,282
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,571
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,017
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,554
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,554
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. Bobby Daryl McGIRT.

No. 390P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Michael Reece, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of July 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review Under G.S. 7A-31":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of August 2006."
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1663

___________________________

Jesse Robert Furr

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction; Randy Watson,

Warden, Varner Unit; Joshua Mayfield, Administrator, Religious Services

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff

 ____________

 Submitted: January 30, 2019

Filed: March 18, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.
Jesse Furr appeals the district court’s grant ofsummary judgment in his pro se 1

action raising claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Land Use and

Institutionalized Persons Act. Having carefully reviewed the evidentiary record and

the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no basis for reversal. See Johnson v.

Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (grant of summary judgment is

reviewed de novo). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable Beth M. Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Arkansas.

-2-
STATE v. FRANKLIN.

No. COA05-1538.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from New Hanover (04CRS66724).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.