alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

 

**INTELLISYNCCORPORATION**

**SUBSIDIARIESOF THE REGISTRANT**

 
| **Subsidiaries**                   | ** ** | **State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------|------------|
| Intellisync  Bulgaria Ltd.         |       | Bulgaria                                         |       |
| Intellisync  K.K.                  |       | Japan                                            |       |
| Intellisync  Romania SRL           |       | Romania                                          |       |
| NetMind  Technologies, Inc.   |       | California,  USA                                 |       |
| PDAapps, Inc.                 |       | Delaware,  USA                                   |       |
| PDA  Software (P) Ltd.        |       | India                                            |       |
| Pumatech  International            |       | California,  USA                                 |       |
| Identity  Systems Pty. Ltd.        |       | Australia                                        |       |
| Intellisync  Australia Pty. Ltd.   |       | Australia                                        |       |
| Intellisync  Identity Systems Ltd. |       | United  Kingdom                                  |       |
| Identity  Systems, Inc.       |       | Delaware,  USA                                   |       |
| Starfish  Software, Inc.      |       | California,  USA                                 |       |
| Synchrologic, Inc.            |       | Georgia,  USA                                    |       |
| Intellisync  Deutschland GmbH      |       | Germany                                          |       |
| Intellisync  Europe Ltd.           |       | United  Kingdom                                  |       |
| Intellisync Italia S.r.l.          |       | Italy                                            |       |
| Tourmaline  Networks, Inc.    |       | California,  USA                                 |       |

 

All subsidiaries of the registrant are wholly-owned.

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 14, 2013

jam

Order 

Clerk

November 14, 2013

147996 (21)

MAURICE JONES, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 147996

COA: 314530

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

and MUSKEGON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 

WARDEN, 

Defendants-Appellees.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to waive fees is considered and it 

is DENIED because MCL 600.2963 requires that a prisoner pursuing a civil action be 

liable for filing fees. 

Within 21 days of the certification of this order, plaintiff shall pay to the 

Clerk of the Court the initial partial filing fee of $51.00, shall submit a copy of this order 

with the payment, and shall refile the copy of the pleadings which is being returned 

with this order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the appeal not being 

filed in this Court.

If plaintiff timely files the partial fee and refiles the pleadings, monthly 

payments shall be made to the Department of Corrections in an amount of 50 percent of 

the deposits made to plaintiff’s account until the payments equal the balance due of 

$324.00. This amount shall then be remitted to this Court.

Pursuant to MCL 600.2963(8) plaintiff shall not file further appeals in civil 

actions in this Court until the entry fee in this case is paid in full. 

The Clerk of the Court shall furnish two copies of this order to plaintiff and 

return plaintiff’s pleadings with this order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                         38,666
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,666
<CGS>                                           29,041
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,041
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 827
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    481
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (337)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                818
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
# L_2013043EN.01003501.xml

| 14.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 43/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 43/35

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 February 2013

appointing a German member of the Committee of the Regions

(2013/79/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Eva QUANTE-BRANDT, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Eva QUANTE-BRANDT,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as member to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Ms Ulrike HILLER, Staatsrätin, Mitglied des Senats der Freien Hansestadt Bremen. |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Ulrike HILLER, Staatsrätin, Mitglied des Senats der Freien Hansestadt Bremen.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 12 February 2013.

For the Council

The President

M. NOONAN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **Global Green Solutions Inc.** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, **Arnold Hughes**, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13th day of April, 2007.

 
ARNOLD HUGHES 
Arnold Hughes 
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Douglas E. Sloan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Teletouch Communications, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                      |  |                                                 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 4, 2006 |  | /s/ Douglas E. Sloan                            
|                      |  | Douglas E. Sloan Interim Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |                                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|-----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    | **ADVANCED                    OPTICS ELECTRONICS, INC.** |
|                               |                                                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
| Date:                    April 16, 2007 | By:                                            | /s/ Leslie                    S.                    Robins                                           |
|                                    | Leslie S. Robins                                         |
|                                    | Chief                    Executive Officer               |

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Donnell Ray GARNER.

No. 241P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Donnell Ray Garner, Pro Se.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*540*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th day of May 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
Milton Gordon WIDENHOUSE, Jr. v. Laura Ellen CRUMPLER.

No. 247P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Laura E. Crumpler, Pro Se.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Chapel Hill, for Gordon Widenhouse.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of May 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
# L_2012169EN.01005901.xml

| 29.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 169/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 169/59

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 576/2012

of 28 June 2012

on the allocation of import rights for applications lodged for the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 for frozen meat of bovine animals

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 of 19 May 2008 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 0206 29 91 (3) opens an import tariff quota for beef and veal products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 of 19 May 2008 opening and providing for the administration of an import tariff quota for frozen meat of bovine animals covered by CN code 0202 and products covered by CN code 0206 29 91 (3) opens an import tariff quota for beef and veal products.

| (2) | The applications for import rights lodged for the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 relate to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import rights may be allocated should therefore be determined and an allocation coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applications for import rights lodged for the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 relate to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import rights may be allocated should therefore be determined and an allocation coefficient laid down to be applied to the quantities applied for,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import right applications covered by the quota with the serial number 09.4003 have been lodged for the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 under Regulation (EC) No 431/2008 shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 30,632325 %.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 29 June 2012.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 June 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 130, 20.5.2008, p. 3.

3

---
#### Sanford B. Frank, Respondent-Appellant, v Toymax International, Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 418]

In an action to recover damages for breach of an employment contract, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Henry, J.), dated September 25, 2003, as denied that branch of its motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) which was to dismiss the fifth and seventh causes of action in the plaintiffs second amended complaint and the plaintiff cross-appeals from the same order.

Ordered that the cross appeal is dismissed as abandoned; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

The employment contract at issue was a “general retainer” and thus the plaintiff can enforce the severance package provision in the agreement *(see Martin v Camp,*219 NY 170, 176 [1916]; *Greenberg v Remick & Co.,*230 NY 70 [1920]; *Ehrlich v Rebco Ins. Exch., Ltd,*198 AD2d 58 [1993]). However, contrary to the Supreme Court’s finding, there may have been “good cause” for the termination of the plaintiffs employment *(see*22 NYCRR 1200.24), and that issue must be determined by the trier of fact. Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Santucci and Mastro, JJ., concur.
IN RE K.L.S. III.

COA05-1591.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 17, 2006.

Certification Date November 6, 2006.

Appeal from Buncombe (04J361, 04J362, 04J363)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1125/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1125/2013 of 8 November 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1125/2013                     

# of 8 November 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Jerzy Plewa                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.