alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2013130DE.01006001.xml

| 15.5.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 130/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 130/60

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1230/2012 der Kommission vom 12. Dezember 2012 zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 661/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich der Anforderungen an die Typgenehmigung von Kraftfahrzeugen und Kraftfahrzeuganhängern bezüglich ihrer Massen und Abmessungen und zur Änderung der Richtlinie 2007/46/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 353 vom 21. Dezember 2012
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 353 vom 21. Dezember 2012

Seite 35, Artikel 3 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„Der Hersteller bestimmt für jede Version innerhalb einer Fahrzeugklasse, unabhängig vom Fertigungsstand des Fahrzeugs, folgende Massen:“

muss es heißen:

„Der Hersteller bestimmt für jede Version innerhalb eines Fahrzeugtyps, unabhängig vom Fertigungsstand des Fahrzeugs, folgende Massen:“.

Seite 53, Anhang I Anlage 1 Tabelle I Punkt 18 erste Spalte:

anstatt:

„Einklappbare Einrichtungen und Vorrichtungen zur Verringerung des Luftwiderstands, sofern sie am Heck des Fahrzeugs um nicht mehr als 50 mm über die größte Länge des Fahrzeugs hinausragen und die Länge der Ladefläche nicht vergrößern.“

muss es heißen:

„Einklappbare Einrichtungen und Vorrichtungen zur Verringerung des Luftwiderstands, sofern sie am Heck des Fahrzeugs um nicht mehr als 500 mm über die größte Länge des Fahrzeugs hinausragen und die Länge der Ladefläche nicht vergrößern.“

Seite 54, Anhang I Anlage 1 Tabelle II Punkt 11 erste Spalte:

anstatt:

„Einrichtungen und Geräte zur Verringerung des Luftwiderstands, sofern sie an den beiden Seiten des Fahrzeugs um nicht mehr als 500 mm über die größte Breite des Fahrzeugs hinausragen und die Ladekapazität nicht vergrößern.“

muss es heißen:

„Speziell zur Verringerung des Luftwiderstands entworfene Einrichtungen und Vorrichtungen, sofern sie an den beiden Seiten des Fahrzeugs um nicht mehr als 50 mm über die größte Breite des Fahrzeugs hinausragen und die Ladekapazität nicht vergrößern.“

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 407

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 2 9873

Trial court: 1 29th District Court of Harris County

On May 19 , 201 4

, relator

, Robinson Helicopter Company, Inc. , filed a petition for a writ

of mandamus . Relator also has filed a motion for emergency stay and a supplemental motion for

emergency stay , requesting a stay as to the trial court ’s March 24, 2014 order compelling

production of documents reflecting relator ’ s net worth

. Relator ’ s motion and supplemental

motion are denied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jim S h arp

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 25, 2016
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 24, 2014

s0616

Order 

Clerk

June 24, 2014

148768

BOB WOODWARD,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant

Appellee,

v SC: 148768

COA: 318029

Wayne CC: 13-006402-AV

CHRISTOPHER SCHWARTZ,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff 

Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 10, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# Political and Security Committee Decision EUTM Somalia/1/2013 (repealed)Show full title

Political and Security Committee Decision EUTM Somalia/1/2013 of 17 December 2013 on the appointment of an EU Mission Commander            for the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces (EUTM Somalia) (2013/777/CFSP)            (repealed)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Political and Security Committee Decision EUTM Somalia/1/2013                     

# of 17 December 2013

# on the appointment of an EU Mission Commander for the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali                        security forces (EUTM Somalia)                     

# (2013/777/CFSP) (repealed)

F1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                        

Textual Amendments

F1Repealed by Political and Security Committee Decision (CFSP) 2015/173 of 3 February 2015 on the appointment of the EU Mission Commander                                 for the European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces (EUTM Somalia) and repealing                                 Decision EUTM Somalia/1/2013 (EUTM Somalia/1/2015).
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 60812 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
SHAW N TAE MAURICE FAIRLEY , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 1:16

- CR

- 98

- 8

Before DENNIS, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Shawnta e Maurice Fairley appeals the 360

- month prison sentence imposed following his conviction of one count of possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. He challenges the district court’s
relevant conduct determination and its conclusion that the drugs underlying the offense were imported. He also argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because it is substantially greater than that of a similarly

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-60812 Document: 00514608863 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/21/2018No. 17

- 60812

2 situated codefendant. Relying on the appellate waiver in the plea agreement, the Gover nment seeks the dismissal of the appeal or, alternately, summary affirmance. Fairley does not challenge the voluntariness of the waiver provision. Instead, he argues that a miscarriage of justice will occur if the waiver is enforced. Our review of the re cord shows that Fairley’s appeal waiver was knowing and voluntary and that, under the plain language of the plea agreement, the waiver applies to his claims

. See United States v. Keele , 755 F.3d 752, 754 (5th Cir. 2014). We decline to adopt the miscarria ge of justice exception to appellate waivers. The Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. The Government’s alternate motion for summary affirmance is DENIED. Case: 17-60812 Document: 00514608863 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/21/2018
Air Force

Army

Navy/Marines

Other Defense

44%

31%

15%

10%

$2.1 $2.3 $2.5 $2.3

$1.6 $1.6 $1.6 $1.4

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

54%

5%

41%

0%

Construcon: 10%

Research and

 Development: 12%

Service: 50%

Supplies and

 Equipment: 28%

Acve Duty: 13%

Civilian: 48%

Naonal Guard/

Reserve: 38%

L3 Technologies

AECOM

Northrop Grumman

Boeing

Utah State University

Jacobs Engineering Group

Sinclair Companies

Chenega Corp.

Mountain West Precast

Kihomac

$258.8 M

$100.8 M

$89.5 M

$52.4 M

$27.6 M

$26.0 M

$23.1 M

$19.3 M

$17.7 M

$14.0 M

Davis

Salt Lake

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Washington

Cache

Carbon

Iron

Box Elder

County

17,862

8,728

1,257

1,224

1,048

351

217

182

98

95

Total*

3,867

225

29

23

46

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Acve Duty

   Military

12,630

1,154

1,069

24

178

15

10

ND

ND

57

Civilian

 FISCAL YEAR 2017

UTAH

   DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Con ense Con ense Contractors (M=millions)

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

   DEFENSE PERSONNEL

Allocaons, By Type

Allocaons, By Service

$1.6 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

$1.6 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

31,301

TOTAL PERSONNEL

31,301

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Loc sonnel Loc sonnel Locaons

*Total also includes unif al also includes uniformed Na ormed Naonal Guar onal Guard and R d and Reserve units. e units.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

104 Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017
AF Actve AF Guard Army Actve Army Guard

UTAH

#31 #26 0.7% $982 #35 #25 #25

$3.0 B

SPENT IN STATE

1.8% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S.

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $1.4 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

31,301 NUMBER

OF PERSONNEL

$1.6 B PERSONNEL

SPENDING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)(M=millions) (M=millions)

NEVADA

Salt Lake County

$421.6 M

Davis County

$383.3 M

Tooele County

$176.4 M

Weber County

$66.8 M

Box Elder County

$44.8 M

Cache County

$39.5 M

Utah County

$30.8 M

Summit County

$14.2 M

Iron County

$8.9 M

Morgan County

$4.3 M

Salt Lake

Davis

Tooele

Weber

Box Elder

Cache

Utah

Summit

Iron

Morgan

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions) B=billions)(M=millions

NEVADA

Davis County

$1.2 B

Salt Lake County

$282.1 M

Tooele County

$86.7 M

Utah County

$31.5 M

Weber County

$30.4 M

Washington County

$6.3 M

Box Elder County

$5.3 M

Cache County

$4.9 M

Iron County

$2.1 M

Sanpete County

$1.4 M

Davis

Salt Lake Tooele

Utah

Weber

Washington

Box Elder

Cache

Iron

Sanpete

Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017 105
EXHIBIT 32.5

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patrick J. Goodman,  Vice President and Treasurer of MidAmerican Funding, LLC
(the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the  quarterly
         period  ended June 30,  2003 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
         requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2) the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  August 6, 2003





                             /s/ Patrick J. Goodman
                             ----------------------
                               Patrick J. Goodman
                          Vice President and Treasurer
                            (chief financial officer)
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 14, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 14, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0046. METROPOLITAN HOME BUILDERS, INC et al. v. BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY, AS SUCCESSOR TO MAIN STREET BANK.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 09EV00645
HOCKNEY & ASSO. v. CORNELIUS.

No. 353P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for C. Preston Cornelius.

C. Preston Cornelius, Pro Se.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of July 2005 by Plaintiff to Request Article III Court:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of January 2006."

Justice EDMUNDS recused.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 17, 2020

No. 04-20-00448-CR

Amber Latia JACK,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR13552

The Honorable Jennifer Pena, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On May 29, 2018, appellant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance and 

sentenced to eight years community supervision. On March 20, 2019, the State filed a motion to 

revoke appellant’s community supervision, and on July 30, 2020, the trial court modified the 

conditions of appellant’s community supervision. On September 3, 2020, appellant filed a notice 

of appeal, seeking to appeal the trial court’s order modifying the conditions of her community 

supervision. 

Modification of community supervision is not appealable at the time of modification. See 

Davis v. State, 195 S.W.3d 708, 710 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“There is no legislative authority 

for entertaining a direct appeal from an order modifying the conditions of community 

supervision.”); Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Quaglia v. State, 906 

S.W.2d 112, 113 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1995, no pet.). A defendant may appeal the 

judgment at the time she is placed on community supervision or her revocation of community 

supervision. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42.12, § 23(b); Quaglia, 906 S.W.2d at 113. 

Here, appellant did not timely appeal from the judgment placing her on community supervision, 

and the clerk’s record does not contain an order revoking her community supervision. It appears 

we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. 

We therefore ORDER appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed 

for lack of jurisdiction by October 19, 2020. All appellate deadlines are suspended pending 

further order of this court. 
_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of September, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
333-44614 and 333-44616 of Return Assured Incorporated, formerly known as Hertz
Technology Group, Inc., all on Form S-3 of our report dated October 26, 2000, on
the financial statements of Hertz Technology Group, Inc. appearing in the Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of Return Assured Incorporated, for the year ended August
31, 2000. We also consent to the reference of our firm under the caption
"Experts".

/s/ Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP
New York, New York
December 14, 2000
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SHANKAR P. MARAGH
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 788

[ August 12, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Glenn D. Kelley , Judge; L.T. Case No.

2017CF001512AXXXMB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, Assistant Attorney Gen eral, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, except for the imposition of $200 for the cost of prosecution, which

, as the S tate concedes

, exceeds the statutorily authorized minimum of $100. See § 938.2 7(8), Fla. Stat. (2018). As the S tate presented no evidence justifying the additional
expense, we reverse pursuant to Bevans v. State , 291 So. 3d 591, 594 (Fla. 4th DCA 2020) and remand for the trial court to “impose the mandatory $100 fee, or to impose further costs if it makes appropriate factual findings to support the imposition.”

W ARNER and M AY , JJ., and H ILAL
, J ENNIFER , Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
OPINION

No. 04-10-00655-CR

In re John William Coleman, Relator

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 27, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION DENIED; MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 

DISMISSED AS MOOT

The court has considered the petition for a writ of prohibition filed by relator, John 

William Coleman, and the response of the real party in interest, and is of the opinion that relief 

should be denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, relator’s petition for a writ of 

prohibition is denied. Relator’s motion for leave to file the petition is dismissed as moot.

The clerk of this court is directed to transmit a copy of this opinion to the attorneys of 

record, the trial court judge, and the trial court clerk.

PER CURIAM

PUBLISH

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause Nos. 2010-DCR-0132 and 2010-DCR-0133, styled The State of Texas 

v. John William Coleman, pending in the 198th Judicial District Court, Kimble County, Texas, the The Honorable 

M. Rex Emerson presiding.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2013

h1118 

# Order

Clerk November 25, 2013

147229(15)

MILISSA WAGGONER,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v SC: 147229

COA: 311853

Isabella CC: 12

- 009753

- AA

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION,

Respondent

- Appellee.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 3,

2013 order is considered, and it is DENIED , because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 11785]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Bámigbóyè: A Master Sculptor of the Yorùbá Tradition” at the Yale University Art Gallery, New Haven, Connecticut, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Stacy E. White,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2022-15249 Filed 7-15-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Order entered September 21, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00734-CV

CHARLES RILEY CONSTANT, Appellant

V.

GEORGE GILLESPIE, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-09846

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 17, 2020 motion for an extension 

of time to file his brief on the merits. By post-card notice dated September 18,

2020, the Court informed appellant that the brief he attempted to file was rejected

because the appendix to the brief was not electronically bookmarked. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 9.4(h). The Court instructed appellant to file a corrected brief within three 

days. In light of these circumstances, we GRANT appellant’s motion to the extent 

that he shall file his corrected brief on or before September 25, 2020.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE