alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certifications set forth
below are being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 27, 2009 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

John A. Lederer, the Chief Executive Officer and John K. Henry, the Chief Financial Officer of Duane Reade Holdings, Inc., each certifies that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duane Reade Holdings, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | /S/ JOHN A. LEDERER    
|                     |  | John A. Lederer        
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                     | 
|                     |  | /S/ JOHN K. HENRY      
|                     |  | John K. Henry          
|Date: August 5, 2009 |  | Chief Financial Officer
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially effect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 6, 2006By:
    
    /s/ James C. Mastandrea

James C. MastandreaChairman of the Board, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
STATE v. MILLER.

No. COA05-330.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Watauga (03CRS50100).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Nicholas HOLMES.

No. 283PA06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 19, 2006.

Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

Jeffrey Evan Noecker, Wilmington, for Nicholas Holmes.

*AMENDED ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 23rd day of May 2006 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of December 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of May 2006 by Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of December 2006."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to *309this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
IN RE T.T.L.

No. COA05-1443.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (04J114).

Case without published opinion. Dismissed.
CAPITAL REALTY, INC. v. JONES.

No. COA06-269.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 5, 2006.

Certification Date December 27, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (04CVS10226).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5616 

To provide for the repeal of the phase out of incandescent light bulbs unless 

the Comptroller General makes certain specific findings. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2008 

Mrs. BACHMANN (for herself, Mr. DAVID DAVIS of Tennessee, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. SMITH of Nebraska, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. GOODE, Mr. 

FEENEY, Mrs. DRAKE, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. 

WELDON of Florida, and Mr. SHADEGG) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide for the repeal of the phase out of incandescent 

light bulbs unless the Comptroller General makes certain 

specific findings. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Light Bulb Freedom 

5 of Choice Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective 6 months after the date 

8 of enactment of this Act, sections 321 and 322, and the 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5616 IH

1 items in the table of contents relating thereto, of the En2 ergy Independence and Security Act of 2007 are repealed, 

3 unless the Comptroller General has before that time trans4 mitted to the Congress a report containing all of the find5 ings described in section 3(a). 

6 (b) REVERSION.—If a repeal occurs under subsection 

7 (a), the amendments made by sections 321 and 322 of 

8 the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 are 

9 hereby repealed, and the laws amended thereby shall read 

10 as if those amendments had not been enacted. 

11 SEC. 3. COMPTROLLER GENERAL REPORT. 

12 (a) FINDINGS.—A report referred to in section 2(a) 

13 is a report that finds that— 

14 (1) consumers will obtain a net savings, in 

15 terms of dollars spent on the combination of month16 ly electric bills and expenses for new light fixtures 

17 to accommodate the use of the light bulbs required 

18 by the amendments described in section 2(a), com19 pared to dollars spent before the enactment of those 

20 amendments; 

21 (2) the phase-out required by those amend22 ments will reduce overall carbon dioxide emissions by 

23 20 percent in the United States by the year 2025; 

24 and 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5616 IH

1 (3) such phase-out will not pose any health 

2 risks, including risks associated with mercury con3 tainment in certain light bulbs, to consumers or the 

4 general public, including health risks with respect to 

5 hospitals, schools, day care centers, mental health 

6 facilities, and nursing homes. 

7 (b) PROJECTIONS.—The report shall include monthly 

8 and yearly projections of expenses described in subsection 

9 (a)(1) over the period of January 1, 2012, through De10 cember 31, 2017. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 333/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 333/2013 of 5 April 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for white marlin in the Atlantic            Ocean by vessels flying the flag of Portugal         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 333/2013                     

# of 5 April 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for white marlin in the Atlantic Ocean by vessels flying the flag of Portugal

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 April 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
#### Sebastian J. Porello, Appellant, v Richard D. Longworth et al., Respondents.

[799 NYS2d 918]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Feinman, J.), entered December 22, 2004, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied his cross motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

To establish a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must prove that (1) the attorney failed to exercise that degree of care, skill, and diligence commonly possessed by a member of the legal community, (2) the attorney’s conduct was the proximate cause of the loss, (3) the plaintiff sustained damages as a direct result, and (4) the plaintiff would have been successful in the underlying action had the attorney exercised due care *(see Dimond v Kazmierczuk & McGrath,*15 AD3d 526, 527 [2005]; *Magnacoustics, Inc. v Ostrolenk, Faber, Gerb & Soffen,*303 AD2d 561, 562 [2003]; *Ippolito v McCormack, Damiani, Lowe & Mellon,*265 AD2d 303 [1999]; *Volpe v Canfield,*237 AD2d 282, 283 [1997]).

Here, the defendants demonstrated their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by establishing that the plaintiff was unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of the legal malpractice cause of action *(see Dimond v Kazmierczuk & McGrath, supra; DeGregorio v Bender,*4 AD3d 385 [2004]; *Albanese v Hametz,*4 AD3d 379, 380 [2004]; *Ostriker v Taylor,**542*Atkins & Ostrow,*258 AD2d 572 [1999]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and properly denied the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment.

The parties’ remaining contentions have been rendered academic in light of our determination. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Fisher, JJ., concur.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-30612

Summary Calendar

 

CURTIS GORDON,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 03-CV-1120-T

--------------------

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Curtis Gordon, Louisiana prisoner # 80114, was convicted by

a jury of second degree murder in 1975 and was sentenced to life

imprisonment. Gordon seeks a certificate of appealability (COA)

to appeal the district court’s order transferring his successive

28 U.S.C. § 2254 application to this court.

We must examine the basis of our jurisdiction sua sponte

if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.

1987). An order transferring a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254
No. 03-30612

-2-

application to the court of appeals is a non-appealable

interlocutory order. See Brinar v. Williamson, 245 F.3d 515,

516-18 (5th Cir. 2001). This court is without jurisdiction to

consider Gordon’s appeal. Accordingly, Gordon’s motion for a

COA is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
H. R. 5813 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To amend Public Law 110–196 to provide for a temporary extension of programs 

authorized by the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002 beyond 

April 18, 2008. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF AGRICULTURAL 

PROGRAMS AND SUSPENSION OF PERMANENT PRICE 

SUPPORT AUTHORITIES. 

Effective as of April 18, 2008, section 1 of Public Law 110– 

196 (122 Stat. 653) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘the Secretary of Agriculture shall carry out the authorities, until April 18, 2008’’ 

and inserting ‘‘the authorities shall be carried out, until April 

25, 2008’’; and 

(2) in subsection (d), by striking ‘‘April 18, 2008’’ and 

inserting ‘‘April 25, 2008’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.2



TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.



OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the Company) for the quarter ended August 31,
2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, J. Kernan Crotty, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:



1. The
Report is in full compliances with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    J. KERNAN CROTTY              
|J. Kernan Crotty                     
|President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 21, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         275529
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1880323
<ALLOWANCES>                                   123869
<INVENTORY>                                    999273
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3513696
<PP&E>                                         431993
<DEPRECIATION>                                 200571
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3813334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2904604
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1900
<OTHER-SE>                                     888868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3813334
<SALES>                                        12159534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               12159534
<CGS>                                          8336963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8336963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               50000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               101869
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             167502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                829831
<INCOME-TAX>                                   289381
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            540450
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   540450
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5357 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain lighting control timers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain lighting control 

timers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LIGHTING CONTROL TIMERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Residential and commercial 

indoor/outdoor programmable 

and countdown lighting control timers (provided for in 

subheading 9107.00.80) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5357 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 134 (Thursday, July 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15095]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control

Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more 
applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in 
property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and 
U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions 
with them.

DATES: See Supplementary Information section for effective date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 
202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-
2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-2480; Assistant 
Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or the Assistant 
Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List and 
additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available 
on OFAC's website (www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On July 11, 2022, OFAC determined that the property and interests 
in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following person is 
blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.

Individuals

    1. SEPULVEDA PORTILLO, Obed Christian, Mexico; DOB 20 May 1982; 
POB Jalisco, Mexico; nationality Mexico; Gender Male; C.U.R.P. 
SEPO820520HJCPRB00 (Mexico) (individual) [ILLICIT-DRUGS-E.O.]. 
Sanctioned pursuant to section 1(b)(iii) of Executive Order 14059 of 
December 15, 2021, ``Imposing Sanctions on Foreign Persons Involved 
in the Global Illicit Drug Trade,'' for being owned, controlled, or 
directed by, or having acted or purported to act for or on behalf 
of, directly or indirectly, the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion 
(CJNG), a sanctioned person.

    Dated: July 11, 2022.
Andrea M. Gacki,
Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the 
Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2022-15095 Filed 7-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P
```
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, the undersigned officer of DXP Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  March 23, 2010





/s/Mac McConnell


Mac McConnell


Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer








The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
STATE v. DUNHAM.

No. COA06-346.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (05CRS75767)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.