alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 137 (Tuesday, July 19, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 43060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15338]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD


Public Availability of the Merit Systems Protection Board FY 2019 
Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Merit Systems Protection Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) is publishing this 
notice to advise the public of the availability of its FY 2019 Service 
Contract Inventory as required by the Consolidated Appropriations Act 
of 2010. This inventory provides information on service contract 
actions over $25,000 awarded in FY 2019. The inventory was developed in 
accordance with guidance issued on November 5, 2010, by the Office of 
Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). 
The OFPP's guidance is available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf. The MSPB posted its 
inventory on its website at https://www.mspb.gov/publicaffairs/contracting.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Tset Wong, Contracting Officer, 
Office of Finance and Administrative Management, Merit Systems 
Protection Board, 1615 M Street NW, Washington, DC 20419; telephone 
202-254-4408; email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97e3e4f2e3b9e0f8f9f0d7fae4e7f5b9f0f8e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ef9b9c8a9bc198808188af829c9f8dc1888099">[email protected]</span></a>.

Jennifer Everling,
Acting Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-15338 Filed 7-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7400-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the report of Poster Financial Group, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),Timothy N. Poster, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 15, 2004 |                      |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------|
|                          | /s/ Timothy N. Poster     |
|                          | Timothy N. Poster         |
|                          | Chairman of the Board and |
|                          | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----
CHANDLEY v. FIRST CHARTER BANK

No. COA05-873

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Buncombe (04CVD3814).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
Exhibit 99.1**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON SCHEDULE**To the Stockholders of INX Inc.Inconnection with our audits of the consolidated financial statementsof INX Inc. (formerly I-Sector Corporation) and subsidiariesreferred to in our report dated March 13, 2006, which is included in the Company’s 2005 Form 10-K,we have also audited Schedule II for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005. In ouropinion, this schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as awhole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein./s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Lori PEREZ, Employee v. AMERICAN AIRLINES/AMR CORP., Employer AIG Vendor Services, Carrier (Administered by Specialty Risk Services).

No. 661PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

Joy H. Brewer, Cary, Kimberly A. D'Arruda, for American Airlines, et al.

John A. Hedrick, Samuel A. Scudder, Raleigh, for Lori Perez.

Joe E. Austin, Jr., Jennifer T. Gottsegen, Raleigh, for NC Asso. Defense Attorneys.

Bruce A. Hamilton, Julia S. Hooten, Raleigh, for NCBBI.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th day of November 2006 for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

FURNISHED PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18

OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. 1350)



I, James R. Tolonen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
Business Objects S.A. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Business Objects S.A.



|                        |  |  | 
|----------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: November 14, 2003 |  |  | 
|                        |  |  | 
|                        |  |  |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 17, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40737 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HECTOR HERNANDEZ-MESA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CR-1902-ALL

-------------------- Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hector Hernandez-Mesa appeals his sentence following a guilty-plea conviction for being an alien found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the first time, Hernandez-Mesa argues that the district court committed reversible plain error by adding 16 levels to his base offense level because he was convicted, prior to deportation, of a felony alien smuggling offense pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1324. Because he was convicted of transporting illegalNo. 04-40737 -2- aliens, an offense different from alien smuggling, Hernandez-Mesa concludes that the addition of 16 levels was unwarranted. He concedes that this argument is foreclosed by United States v. Solis-Campozano , 312 F.3d 164, 167-68 (5th Cir. 2002). He nevertheless seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review.

In Solis-Campozano , we concluded that all of the offenses listed in § 1324(a)(1)(A), which include transporting and harboring illegal aliens, are “alien smuggling” offenses for purposes of § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(vii). 312 F.3d at 167-68. Hernandez-Mesa’s argument is thus foreclosed. See id. For the first time, Hernandez-Mesa argues that the felony and aggravated felony provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional, both facially and as applied, under Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). He correctly concedes that this argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998) , but nevertheless he seeks to preserve the issue for possible Supreme Court review. See United States v. Izaguirre-Flores , 405 F.3d 270, 277-78 (5th Cir. 2005) (noting that the Supreme Court in Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres ), petition for cert. filed (July 22, 2005) (No. 05-5469). Hernandez-Mesa argues for the first time in a supplemental letter brief that his sentence is illegal under United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), because the district courtNo. 04-40737 -3- sentenced him under the mistaken belief that the guidelines were mandatory. Review is for plain error. United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo , 407 F.3d 728, 732-33 (5th Cir. 2005) , petition for cert. filed (July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556). Nothing in the record indicates that the district court would have imposed a different sentence had the guidelines been advisory. Id. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Press Release


 Exhibit 10.5 
  

			
	

	 	News Corporation
	  
 NEWS RELEASE


  

			
	For Immediate Release	 	Contact: Andrew Butcher 212-852-7070

  
 Lachlan Murdoch Resigns From
Executive Roles at News Corporation 
  
 NEW YORK, NY, July 29, 2005
– News Corporation chairman and chief executive officer Mr. Rupert Murdoch today announced that the Company’s deputy chief operating officer, Mr. Lachlan Murdoch, will resign from his executive roles with the Company, effective August 31,
2005. 
  
 Mr. Murdoch joined the Company in 1994 and has served in various
capacities, most recently as Deputy Chief Operating Officer of News Corporation and Publisher of the New York Post. 
  
 In addition to remaining as a director of the Company Lachlan Murdoch will advise the Company in a number of areas. 
  
 Lachlan Murdoch said: “I have today resigned my executive position at News Corporation.
I will remain on the board and I am excited about my continued involvement with the Company in a different role. 
  
 “I look forward to returning home to Australia with my wife, Sarah, and son, Kalan, in the very near future. I would like especially to thank my father for all he
has taught me in business and in life. It is now time for me to apply those lessons to the next phase of my career.” 
  
 Rupert Murdoch said: “I am particularly saddened by my son’s decision and thank him for his terrific contribution to the company, and also his agreement to stay
on the board and advise us in a number of areas. I have respected the professionalism and integrity that he has exhibited throughout his career at News Corporation. 
  
 “His achievements include driving all of his reporting divisions to record profits and the New York Post to its highest-ever
circulation. I am grateful that I will continue to have the benefit of Lachlan’s counsel and wisdom in his continued role on the Company’s board.” 
  
 News Corporation (NYSE: NWS, NWS.A; ASX: NWS, NWSLV) had total assets as of March 31, 2005 of approximately US$56 billion and total annual
revenues of approximately US$23 billion. News Corporation is a diversified international media and entertainment company with operations in eight industry segments: filmed entertainment; television; cable network programming; direct broadcast
satellite television; magazines and inserts; newspapers; book publishing; and other. The activities of News Corporation are conducted principally in the United States, Continental Europe, the United Kingdom, Australia, Asia and the Pacific
Basin. 
  
 1211 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS • NEW YORK,
NEW YORK 10036 • newscorp.com
Exhibit 10.2
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO
STOCK SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT
 Amendment Employee Company Effective Date
 Original Subscription Agreement
 Subscription Shares
      Defined Terms
 Extension of the Vesting Period
  1




---



##### 



(i)
    
    a public offering by the Company sufficient to
liquidate the Subscription Shares,(ii)
    
    an exchange of the Companys existing shares for new
shares, and(iii)
    
    September 29, 2011.
 Extension of Forfeiture Period Upon Termination
  Terms of Original Subscription Agreement Ratified and Confirmed
 Conflict
 Binding Effect and Counterparts
 2




---



##### 



Governing Law; Amendments
  PARAGON REAL ESTATE EQUITY AND
INVESTMENT TRUST, a Maryland trust/s/ John J. DeeBy:  John J. DeeIts:   Secretary/s/ James C. MastandreaJames C. Mastandrea 3
STATE v. Carlton DAVIS.

No. 492PO4-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of May 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Plain Error Review N.C.G.S. 7A-28(A)(1)(2)(3)(4)":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of June 2006."
STATE v. SMITH.

COA06-522.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Beaufort (05CRS52783).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00623-CR

AMBER NICOLE SORENSON

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Jackson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17-5-9932

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 14, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB as of and for the fiscal year ended
October 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001020448
<NAME>                        Imperial Petroleum Recovery Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          49,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,563
<PP&E>                                         144,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          886,841
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,732
<OTHER-SE>                                    (905,385)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,688
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,289
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,472,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,449,106)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,449,106)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                123,778
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,325,328)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.09)
        


</TABLE>
SEA RANCH OWNERS ASSO. v. Sea RANCH.

No. 338P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 26, 2006.

Alyssa M. Chen, William S. Hoyle, for Sea Ranch Owners Assoc.

Steven C. Frucci, Virginia Beach, VA, Bradford J. Lingg, for Sea Ranch II, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of June 2006 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of June 2006."
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Annual Report of
Internet Infinity, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended March
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  July
      7, 2009/s/ George
    MorrisGeorge
      MorrisChief
      Executive Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Internet Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Internet Infinity, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Andrea Antionette BRYANT.

No. 117A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Ann Stone, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Daniel R. Pollitt, Matthew Wunsche, Assistant Appellate Defenders, for Andrea Antionette Bryant.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of March 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
STATE v. FRANKLIN.

No. COA05-1577.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 15, 2006.

Certification Date September 5, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS201402, 04CRS201403).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
In the Matter of M.B. appealed by Niamalikia R.

No. 216P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Robert W. Ewing, Winston-Salem, for Niamalikia R.

Alan Edmonds, Charlotte, for Mecklenburg County DSS.

Alexandria S. Gruber, Appellate Coordinator, for Guardian Ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of April 2006 by Respondent (Niamalikia R.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

07-16032

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDERICK KARL JOST,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

U.S. POSTAL SERVICE and U.S.

POSTMASTER,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 07-16032

D.C. No. CV-05-01360-AWI

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Frederick Karl Jost, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) alleging that

FILED

JAN 25 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-16032

the United States Postal Service lost the contents of a package that Jost had mailed. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s

dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Resnick v. Hayes,

213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) and for an abuse of discretion its denial of leave

to amend, Halet v. Wend Inv. Co., 672 F.2d 1305, 1310 (9th Cir. 1982). We

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Jost’s action because the deprivation

Jost alleges — the loss of his mail — does not rise to a constitutional violation. 

See Cnty. of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833, 848-49 (1998) (“[T]he

Constitution does not guarantee due care on the part of state officials; liability for 

negligently inflicted harm is categorically beneath the threshold of constitutional

due process.”); Hartman v. Moore, 547 U.S. 250, 255 n.2 (2006) (Bivens action is

federal analog to civil rights suit against state officials).

The district court properly dismissed any claim under the Federal Tort

Claims Act because Jost failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing

this action. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 2401(b), 2675(a); 39 C.F.R. § 912.5.
3 07-16032

The district court acted within its discretion by dismissing Jost’s complaint

without leave to amend. See Balser v. Dep’t of Justice, Off. of U.S. Trustee, 327

F.3d 903, 911 (9th Cir. 2003) (affirming denial of leave to amend complaint,

despite liberality generally afforded pro se litigants, because opening brief on

appeal set forth no legal basis for reversal).

Jost’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10(a) 





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 





We consent to the incorporation by
reference in this Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement No. 811-21298 under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 of Master Treasury Trust on Form N-1A of our reports dated
May 20, 2005 for each Trust and each related Fund listed below, appearing in the March
31, 2005 Annual Reports of CMA Money Fund and WCMA Money Fund, CMA Government Securities
Fund and WCMA Government Securities Fund, CMA Tax-Exempt Fund and WCMA Tax-Exempt Fund,
and CMA Treasury Fund and WCMA Treasury Fund, respectively, which are incorporated by
reference in Part B of this Registration Statement. 




	Name

      
      

      Master Money Trust 

      CMA Money Fund 

      WCMA Money Fund 	 	 	 	 
	Master Government Securities Trust
      

      CMA Government Securities Fund 

      WCMA Government Securities Fund 	 	 	 	 
	Master Treasury Trust 

      CMA Treasury Fund 

      WCMA Treasury Fund 	 	 	 	 
	Master Tax-Exempt Trust 

      CMA Tax-Exempt Fund 

      WCMA Tax-Exempt Fund 	 	 	 	 





/s/ Deloitte & Touche  LLP  





Princeton, New Jersey 
 July 25, 2005