alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the Matter of Y.Q.M. appealed by Shanita Fryar, Respondent.

No. 260P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 17, 2006.

Winifred H. Dillon, Raleigh, for Shanita Fryar.

Corinne Railey, for Sampson County DSS.

S. Nicole Taylor, Raleigh, for Guardian ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of May 2006 by Respondent (Shanita Fryar) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006."
STATE v. Elgin Orlandas HART.

No. 446A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 7, 2006.

Barbara Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hart.

Lisa Y. Harper, Lisa Graham, Assistant Attorney Generals, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of December 2006 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 10th day of January 2007 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 7th day of December 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Business
Objects S.A. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements
of Income and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         196,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   61,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,206
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               273,365
<PP&E>                                          42,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,345
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 319,107
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,994
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,583
<OTHER-SE>                                     179,227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   319,107
<SALES>                                        243,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               243,140
<CGS>                                           40,524
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               167,293
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,804)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,637
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,287
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,350
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,350
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5666 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the earned income 

tax credit to taxpayers who exceed 40 hours of wage work per week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2008 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

the earned income tax credit to taxpayers who exceed 

40 hours of wage work per week. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Overtime Restoration 

5 Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EITC INCREASED BY WEEKLY OVERTIME BONUS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 32 of the 

8 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to allowance of 

9 credit) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

10 paragraph: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5666 IH

1 ‘‘(3) INCREASE BY WEEKLY OVERTIME

2 BONUS.— 

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The amount allowed 

4 as a credit under paragraph (1) (after the ap5 plication of paragraph (2)) shall be increased by 

6 the amount so allowed multiplied by the weekly 

7 overtime bonus. 

8 ‘‘(B) WEEKLY OVERTIME BONUS.—For 

9 purposes of subparagraph (A), the weekly over10 time bonus is 1 percentage point for each week 

11 in the taxable year for which the individual re12 ceived earned income described in subsection 

13 (c)(A)(i) for work of more than 40 hours of 

14 service (within the meaning of section 

15 410(a)(3)(C)). 

16 ‘‘(C) SPECIAL RULE FOR JOINT RE17 TURNS.—In the case of a joint return, subpara18 graph (A) shall be applied separately to the tax19 payer and the taxpayer’s spouse. 

20 ‘‘(D) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary shall 

21 prescribe such regulations as may be necessary 

22 to prevent the abuse of the purposes of this 

23 paragraph.’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5666 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2008. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# L_2021420DE.01013201.xml

| 25.11.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 420/132 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 420/132

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses Nr. 529/2013/EU des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 21. Mai 2013 über die Anrechnung und Verbuchung von Emissionen und des Abbaus von Treibhausgasen infolge von Tätigkeiten im Sektor Landnutzung, Landnutzungsänderungen und Forstwirtschaft und über Informationen zu Maßnahmen in Zusammenhang mit derartigen Tätigkeiten

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 165 vom 18. Juni 2013
  )

Seite 86, Artikel 3 Absatz 3

Anstatt:

„(3)   Für jeden der in Annex I genannten Anrechnungszeiträume können die Mitgliedstaaten auch Konten erstellen und führen, ...“

muss es heißen:

„(3)   Für jeden der in Anhang I genannten Anrechnungszeiträume können die Mitgliedstaaten auch Konten erstellen und führen, ...“.

---
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1393/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1393/2013 of 13 December 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in EU and international            waters of V; international waters of XII and XIV by vessels flying the flag of Spain         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1393/2013                     

# of 13 December 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for redfish in EU and international waters of V; international waters of XII and XIV                        by vessels flying the flag of Spain                     

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and,                              to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international                              negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.
# C_2013088EN.01000101.xml

| 26.3.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 88/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 88/1

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 21 March 2013

concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (eighth EDF) for the financial year 2011

2013/C 88/01

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the fourth ACP-EEC Convention, signed at Lomé on 15 December 1989 (1) and amended by the Agreement signed in Mauritius on 4 November 1995 (2),

1

2

Having regard to the Internal Agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the financing and administration of the Community aid under the Second Financial Protocol to the fourth ACP-EC Convention (3) (the ‘Internal Agreement’) setting up, amongst others, the eighth European Development Fund (eighth EDF), and in particular Article 33(3) thereof,

3

Having regard to the Financial Regulation of 16 June 1998 applicable to development finance cooperation under the fourth ACP-EC Convention (4), and in particular Articles 66 to 74 thereof,

4

Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the eighth EDF as at 31 December 2011, and the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the eighth, ninth and tenth European Development Funds (EDFs) (5), concerning the financial year 2011, together with the Commission's replies contained in that Annual Report,

5

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 33(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the eighth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 33(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the eighth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.

| (2) | The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the eighth EDF during the financial year 2011 has been satisfactory, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the eighth EDF during the financial year 2011 has been satisfactory,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the eighth EDF for the financial year 2011.

Done at Brussels, 21 March 2013.

For the Council

The President

P. HOGAN

---

(1)  OJ L 229, 17.8.1991, p. 3.

1

(2)  OJ L 156, 29.5.1998, p. 3.

2

(3)  OJ L 156, 29.5.1998, p. 108.

3

(4)  OJ L 191, 7.7.1998, p. 53.

4

(5)  OJ C 344, 12.11.2012, p. 243.

5

---
# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1249/2013Show full title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1249/2013 of 29 November 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for plaice in areas VIIf            and VIIg by vessels flying the flag of France         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Regulation (EU) No 1249/2013                     

# of 29 November 2013

# establishing a prohibition of fishing for plaice in areas VIIf and VIIg by vessels flying the flag of France

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring                           compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy(1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Council Regulation (EU) No 39/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available to EU vessels for                              certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are not subject to international negotiations or agreements(2), lays down quotas for 2013.

(2)According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation                              by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for                              2013.

(3)It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

## Article 1U.K.Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein                     for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.                  

## Article 2U.K.Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in                     the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited                     to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.                  

## Article 3U.K.Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 November 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

Lowri Evans                            

*Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries*                            

## ANNEXU.K.

1

OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 1.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO. 09
- 18
- 00 456
- CR NO. 09
- 18
- 00 457
- CR NO. 09
- 18
- 00 458
- CR



### ____________________ JULIUS JERMAINE JORDAN , Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 128 th District Court Orange County, Texas Trial Cause No s . A170058
- R, A170061
- R, and A170064
- R

________________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION On November 1, 2018, the trial court signed orders nunc pro tunc granting credit for jail time in trial court case numbers A170058

- R, A170061

- R, and
A170064

- R

. Notice of appeal was due to be filed by December 3, 2018. See Tex. R

. App. P. 2 6.2(a)(1). On December 6, 2018, the trial court clerk received and filed a notice of appeal dated December 4, 2018. On December 10, 2018, we notified Jordan2 that an extension of time was required because the notice of appeal was filed late but wit hin fifteen days of the date it was due. See generally Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 ; see also Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a)

. Jordan filed a motion for extension of time for trial court case number A170061

- R with the trial court clerk on December 21, 2018. The motion was dated December 17, 2018, but was not addressed to the proper court.
See Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b). No motion for extension of time was filed with the Court of Appeals within fifteen days of the last day for perfecting the appeals. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. On January 8, 2019, we notified the parties that the appeals would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Jordan filed a response in which he argued that he perfected his appeal timely because he submitted the notice of appeal to the prison mail room offic ials within thirty days of the date that he received notice that the trial court had signed orders nunc pro tunc. However, the time for perfecting an appeal runs from the date the order is signed , not the date the defendant learns the order has been signed

. See Davis v. State , 502 S.W.3d 803, 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016); Rodarte v. State , 860 S.W.2d 108, 109

– 10 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). We lack the authority to suspend the rules with regard to the time for perfecting an appeal. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210(Tex. Crim. App. 1998). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.3 APPEALS DISMISSED

.

________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice Submitted on February 5, 2019 Opinion Delivered February 6, 2019 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Johnson , JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1




The following certification is provided by the undersigned President and Principal Executive Officer of Centrue Financial Corporation on the basis of such officer’s knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




CERTIFICATION




In connection with the Annual Report of Centrue Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Thomas A. Daiber, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Thomas A. DaiberName: Thomas A. DaiberTitle: President andPrincipal Executive OfficerDate: March 25, 2011
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 30098

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,

v.
KEVIN HONEYCUTT , Defendant

- Appell ant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:18

- CV

- 1346 USDC No. 3:15

- CR

- 58

- 2

Before DENNIS, ELROD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Kevin Ho neycutt, federal prisoner # 17578

- 035, moves for a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his sentence s for conspiring to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute a controlled substance , possessing with intent to distribute
a controlled substance , and being a convicted felon in possession of firearms.
In his § 2255 motion , Honeycutt claimed that his trial counsel rendered

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 14, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-30098 Document: 00515381460 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/14/2020No. 19

- 30098

2 ineffective assistance during the plea negotiation stage and relative to his decision to plead guilty or proceed to trial. He also requested an evidentiary hearing. To obtain a COA, a movant must make “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Where a district court has denied claims on the merits, a movant must show “that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003). Honeycutt has not met this standard with respect to his ineffective
assistance claim and has therefore not sh own an entitlement to a COA. We construe his motion for a COA with respect to the district court’s denial of an evidentiary hearing as a direct appeal of that issue, see Norman v. Stephens , 817 F.3d 226, 234 (5th Cir. 2016), and affirm. Honeycutt’s motio n for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal is denied. COA DENIED; AFFIRMED ; IFP DENIED

. Case: 19-30098 Document: 00515381460 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/14/2020
STATE v. John Scott BADGETT.

No. 522A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 11, 2006.

James R. Glover, Chapel Hill, for Badgett.

Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of April 2006 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 10th day of May 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of April 2006."