alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997      JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997      MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,676                0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,505                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       514                0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,091                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,163                0
<PP&E>                                          19,938                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,330                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,395                0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,549                0
<BONDS>                                              0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                0
<COMMON>                                        19,917                0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (459)                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,395                0
<SALES>                                         17,287           10,772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,287           10,772
<CGS>                                           10,814            6,919
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,647            8,953
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  87              312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,553            1,507
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,017              580
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,536              861
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                0
<CHANGES>                                            0                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,536              861
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19<F1>          .20<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18<F1>          .20<F1>
<FN>                                                             
<F1>
This information has been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 128, and basic 
and diluted EPS have been entered in place of primary and fully diluted, 
respectively.                                         
</FN>
                                                             

</TABLE>
COORDINATED HEALTH SERVICES, INC. v. PRIMARY HEALTH CHOICE, INC.

No. COA05-783.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed March 7, 2006.

Certification Date March 27, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (03CVS14941)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Therese Kusmierz, Also Known as Therese Milkowski, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 207]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Ronald H. Tills, A.J.), rendered February 27, 2004. The judgment convicted defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the second degree and filing a false or fraudulent New York State tax return.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her upon her plea of guilty of, inter alia, grand larceny in the second degree (Penal Law § 155.40 [1]). The charges arose in connection with the filing of claims for Medicaid reimbursement by defendant, as an agent for a hospital in Pennsylvania, for services that she knew were not provided. Contrary to the contention of defendant, the authority to investigate and prose*1405cute persons for Medicaid fraud was properly conferred upon the Attorney General pursuant to Executive Law § 63 (3) *(see Matter of Mann Judd Landau v Hynes,*49 NY2d 128, 135 [1979]; *People v Marketing & Adv. Servs. Ctr. Corp.,*272 AD2d 982 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 761 [2000]; *cf. People v Gilmour,*98 NY2d 126, 133-134 [2002]). By pleading guilty, defendant waived her contention that the conduct for which she was indicted occurred prior to the expiration of the five-year statute of limitations set forth in GPL 30.10 (2) (b) *(see People v Dickson,*133 AD2d 492, 494-495 [1987]; *see generally People v Hansen,*95 NY2d 227, 230-231 [2000]). In any event, that contention is without merit. The waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses her challenge to the severity of the sentence *(see People v Lococo,*92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contention and conclude that it is without merit. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.
STATE v. JEFFRIES.

COA06-474.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 21, 2006.

Certification Date December 11, 2006.

Appeal from the Wake (05CRS13137, 05CRS14148).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. LOFTON.

COA06-119.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 7, 2006.

Certification Date November 27, 2006.

Appeal from the Wayne (04CRS53746).

Case reported without published opinion. No error at trial. Defendant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is dismissed.
# Commission Implementing Decision of 11 December 2013 refusing the request by Hungary to introduce a Quick Reaction Mechanism            special measure derogating from Article 193 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax (notified            under document C(2013) 9007) (Only the Hungarian text is authentic) (2013/769/EU)         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Decision

# of 11 December 2013

# refusing the request by Hungary to introduce a Quick Reaction Mechanism special measure derogating from Article 193 of Council                        Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax                     

# (notified under document C(2013) 9007)

# (Only the Hungarian text is authentic)

# (2013/769/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax(1), and in particular Article 199b thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)By notification registered at the Commission on 27 November 2013, Hungary requested authorisation to introduce a Quick Reaction                              Mechanism special measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC.

(2)According to that notification, it has come to the attention of the national authorities that a number of traders have engaged                              in tax evasion by not paying VAT to the competent tax authorities.

(3)The requested measure consists in designating the taxable person to whom goods, in this case sugar, are supplied as liable                              for the payment of VAT instead of the supplier.

(4)On 4 December 2013, the Commission notified the Member States that it had all the information necessary to appraise the request.

(5)On the basis of detailed fraud figures in this sector provided by Hungary, it clearly appears that fraud in the sector was                              already of a substantive nature in 2011 and 2012.

(6)Therefore, it has been established that the fraud identified is not of a sudden nature within the meaning of Article 199b                              of Directive 2006/112/EC.

(7)The requested derogation should therefore not be granted,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

# Article 1U.K.

Hungary may not introduce the requested Quick Reaction Mechanism special measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive                     2006/112/EC.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Decision is addressed to Hungary.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2013.

*For the Commission*                            

Algirdas Šemeta                            

*Member of the Commission*                            

1

OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1.
STATE v. CALDWELL.

No. COA05-1646.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed February 6, 2007.

Certification Date February 26, 2007.

Appeal from the Forsyth (96CRS9888).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 135 (Friday, July 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42534-42535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15110]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #17520 and #17521; MINNESOTA Disaster Number MN-
00097]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Minnesota

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of MINNESOTA (FEMA-
4658-DR), dated 07/08/2022.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Tornadoes, and 
Flooding.
    Incident Period: 05/08/2022 through 05/13/2022.

DATES: Issued on 07/08/2022.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/06/2022.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/10/2023.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 07/08/2022, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Aitkin, Big Stone, Cass, Chippewa, Cottonwood,

[[Page 42535]]

Douglas, Grant, Kandiyohi, Lac Qui Parle, Lincoln, Morrison, Nobles, 
Pope, Redwood, Renville, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Traverse, 
Wadena, Wilkin, Yellow Medicine.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      1.875
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      1.875
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17520 B 
and for economic injury is 17521 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Joshua Barnes,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2022-15110 Filed 7-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 19 (Monday, January 31, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Page 4877]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-1682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel, Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Date: January 28, 2005.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: EPN-C, 6130 Executive Blvd., Rockville, MD 20852, 
(Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Timothy C. Meeker, MD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Special Referral and Resources Branch, Division of 
Extramural Activities, National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 8088, Rockville, MD 20852, 301/594-1279.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: January 24, 2005.
Anna P. Snouffer,
Acting Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 05-1682 Filed 1-28-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-M
# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 289/2013Show full title

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 289/2013 of 25 March 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining            the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables         

        - Previous
        - Next

U.K.

# Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 289/2013                     

# of 25 March 2013

# establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural                           markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation)(1),                        

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application                           of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors(2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,                        

Whereas:

(1)Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations,                              the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products                              and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

(2)The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU)                              No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its                              publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

# Article 1U.K.

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to                     this Regulation.                  

# Article 2U.K.

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the *Official Journal of the European Union*.                  

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 March 2013.

*For the Commission, On behalf of the President*,                           

José Manuel Silva Rodríguez                            

*Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development*                            

## ANNEXU.K.Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.                           

2

OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.
STATE of North Carolina v. Karen Elaine EVERETT.

No. 350A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2007.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 630 S.E.2d 703 (2006), reversing and remanding a judgment entered 12 August 2004 by Judge Leon Stanback in Superior Court, Wake County, and ordering a new trial. Heard in the Supreme Court 8 January 2007.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Thomas G. Meacham, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Robert C. Montgomery, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Amos Granger Tyndall, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellee.

*443PER CURIAM.

Justice HUDSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. *See State v. Harrison,* 360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); *Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co.,* 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); *Robinson v. Byrd,* 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. Paul Anthony BROWN.

No. 145A02-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 23, 2006.

Elizabeth Hambourger, Durham, Barry McNeil, for Paul Brown.

C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of August 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Paul Brown) shall have up to and including the 11th day of November 2006 to file and his petition for writ of certiorari with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of August 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. James Albert COLEY, Jr.

No. 399P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

James Albert Coley, Jr., Pro Se.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 31st day of July 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 16th day of November 2006."
Haywood A. CANNON v. WIGGINS, Adm.

No. 527P00-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 16, 2006.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of July 2006 by Plaintiff in the Cause:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of November 2006."

Justices WAINWRIGHT and MARTIN recused.
STATE v. MYERS AND COLEMAN.

No. 660PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 23, 2006.

William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Jesse Warren Coleman.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of June 2006 by Defendants for extension to file brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendants (Myers and Coleman) shall have up to and including the 10th day of July 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of June 2006."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5736 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5736

 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
     Gadsden, Alabama, as the Colonel Ola Lee Mize Veterans Clinic.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2008

 Mr. Aderholt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
     Gadsden, Alabama, as the Colonel Ola Lee Mize Veterans Clinic.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDING.

    Congress finds that Colonel Ola Lee Mize, a Medal of Honor 
recipient, is a highly decorated veteran from the State of Alabama.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OUTPATIENT CLINIC 
              IN GADSDEN, ALABAMA.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs community based outpatient 
clinic in Gadsden, Alabama, shall be known and designated as the 
``Colonel Ola Lee Mize Veterans Clinic''. Any reference to such 
community based outpatient clinic in any law, regulation, map, 
document, record, or other paper of the United States shall be 
considered to be a reference to the Colonel Ola Lee Mize Veterans 
Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. Lorenzo DUARTE.

No. 653P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

William D. Auman, for Duarte.

Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of November 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of December 2005."