alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Kunta Kinte WINDLEY.

No. 259P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Kunta Kinte Windley, Pro Se.

Charlesena E. Walker, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Kunta K. Windley.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

*289*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 23rd day of September 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of September 2005 by Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
In the Matter of S.W. appealed by S.W.

No. 417P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Matthew Wunsche, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Stanley Worley.

Judith Tillman, Assistant Attorney General, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of August 2005 by Petitioner (S.W.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
01

- 14

- 00898

- CR 

### In the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas

Jose Cristino Hernandez, Jr.
, Appellant

v. The State of Texas
, Appellee



### First Motion to Extend Time to File Brief
Jose Hernandez moves, under Rules 10.1 and 10.5(b) of the Te xas Rules of Appellate Procedure, to extend the deadline for filing his brief.
The current deadline is January 20, 2015

. This is Appellant’s first motion to extend time to file his brief

. Appellant’s counsel is still reviewing the record in this case, and has also b een occupied with preparing briefs for Morgan v. State, 14

- 14

- 00607

- CR , in the Fourteenth Court of Appeals; and Jimenez v. United States, 14

- 51332 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Appellant prays that the Court grant the motion and extend the deadline for filing his brief for 30 days from today , to March 7 , 2015

. ACCEPTED 01-14-00898-CR FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/6/2015 10:58:57 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK2 Certificate of Compliance
The word

- processing software used to write this motion reports its length as 203 words

. Certificate of Service I provided this document to the State by electronic service to curry_alan@dao.hctx.net simultaneously with electronic filing

. Respectfully,

______ ______________ Bynum Law Office PLLC Franklin Bynum 2814 Hamilton Street Texas Bar Number 24069451 Houston, Texas 77004 fgb@lawfgb.com (713) 343

- 8844
. . . . . I

OFFICE OF THE **AITORNEY GENERAL**  OF TEXAS AUSTIN

**I ;**  **1 I**  **::. +** Bonoras1e To Il.TrirbL8, psgo #la



### ulthout his 8ignature e Oeta the bill beorummla8 5y litmltation aru.that hi8 veto 01118too &to.

iYehove 4xrimineda oopy of th4 billn4ntfoned, t&8 oaptloa of mhloh mad8 a8 follorrt

*AH 

### AGT prOrid* fCrrthe OOw01 #Uidauusago

### ment.or the atrairs of the 

### chnppell Elll nadopmdent Sob001 Dietriat in Udipon County. Teams, to be ve8tdl in the County ?4ord of Sohooi fX?u8- .teao] prolming that th* oantPo1 and weelee of **said** Dirt&at sluu. heroaf'ter bo to&&d ln 

### thecouut &u-d Of SohoolTruators t4 b4 4zealsed'by It in the nannor now ruthorie4d by 4s. isting lrur; qmeling ell loxa and parts of 1408 in aomffiot with thi8 Aat] and declaring an ast6r8OllDf."



### Replybag

toy& tiqn*1 it. Is our 0pinioQ that it 18 iaonatetiti uhothe the Qmanw~.algxmd or vetoed the bill for tho rectsontlmtiit la am8on8titutlon8l baaauao in 

### violation OS Art~;l$& 

### seotion!56 of tho ate4 Oonrtltution, wlioh pro-

-OThe lu&.aturo $bl.k'aiot, except 'as otihmmi8r provided ln thl8 **Qonotltution,** @sr my 104rl or speoial lw **xqulatlljg** the **rHaim af**  **II** ***** **Ic mheol**  **dlrtriats. “**  **kriar** to Juauary 1, lS87, the t*p;islnttmimr'@nthwimd by Arttolr 1, S.etion S, 

### to proddo Sor the **ioxmatlon** of rho&l dirtriot by gowl or crp4olallaw, md Qhia w-a8hold to bo u1 ara8ption to **Artiolo** 34 soetion 66, alapzu,but th4 1887 anmaaont to Ssotioa 8 dolt

&tie18 7 au@qM8rd the ksl82ltum to prov$Aa **for the**  **fommtion ol**  4ohoo dortroyln& f&a only o%ceptfon 'to the di8tHot8 by ~~s.%.&l,Ubiiti~ 

### to pa88 

### looalor rpeolal ,lnr r8gulat 

### !I-

ag the 

### l

ffUr8 ot 

### r&m01 f
,. 

# .I si

### $26

,
Jeffrey & Co. v. Everett.

No. 259P06

Supreme Court of North Carolina

August 17, 2006

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of May 2006 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal":

> Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 17th day of August 2006.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
- - - - - - - - NO. 20-0541 CATHERINE ROSSI v. CAE INC. AND CAE SIMUFLITE, INC. § § § § § § Dallas County, 5th District.
September 25, 2020 Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case, having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.

 I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under the date shown. It is further ordered that petitioner, CATHERINE ROSSI, pay all costs incurred on this petition. WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this the 29th day of October, 2020.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF CONDITION AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,745
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             366
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                14,375
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          13,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            12,933
<LOANS>                                        368,613
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,640
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 418,928
<DEPOSITS>                                     331,806
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              9,042
<LONG-TERM>                                     37,905
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,148
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 418,928
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 24,488
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  990
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                25,478
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,513
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,326
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,152
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      201
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,283
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,921
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,896
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.490
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,967
<LOANS-PAST>                                        60
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,682
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      125
<RECOVERIES>                                        10
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,768
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,768
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,451
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.07      CONSENT OF PASCAL SIMARD   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2013 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Pascal Simard, participated in the preparation of the following technical reports:  - Technical Report and Recommendations, Reconnaissance and Trenching Program, Ashuanipi Project, Québec completed in March 2012; and  - Technical Report and Recommendations, Winter 2012 Drilling Program, Lac Gayot property, Québec, Virginia Mines inc. and KGHM International Ltd. completed in January 2013;  concerning mineralized material in the Ashuanipi and Lac Gayot properties for the Company (collectively the Reports). Portions of the Reports are summarized, for the Ashuanipi property, under headings Item III  Description of the Business  3.6.4 Geological Setting; 3.6.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.6.6 Mineralization and for the Lac Gayot property, under headings 3.8.4 Geological Setting, 3.8.5 Exploration and Drilling, and 3.8.6 Mineralization in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2013 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,     /S/ Pascal SimardName:
Pascal Simard
Geologist in training  May 13, 2013
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5455 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make nondischargeable 

debts for personal injuries that result in permanent disability. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2008 

Mr. BURTON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make nondischargeable debts for personal injuries that result in 

permanent disability. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMENDMENT. 

4 Section 523(a) of title 11, the United States Code, 

5 is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (18) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

7 end, 

8 (2) in paragraph (19) by striking the period at 

9 the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’, and 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5455 IH

1 (3) by inserting after paragraph (19) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(20) for a personal injury that results in a 

4 permanent disability.’’. 

5 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

6 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub7 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this 

8 Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

9 Act. 

10 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend11 ments made by this Act shall apply only with respect to 

12 cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code 

13 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
GOOD HOPE v. NCDHHS.

No. 58A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 31, 2006.

Maureen D. Murray, Susan M. Fradenburg, Greensboro, William W. Stewart, Jr., Raleigh, for Good Hope Health System.

C. Winston Gilchrist, Lillington, for Town of Lillington.

Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Marcus Lodge, for NCDHHS.

Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Wallace C. Hollowell, III, K. Edward Greene, Kathleen A. Naggs, Raleigh, Denise M. Gunter, Winston-Salem, for Betsy Johnson Regional Hosp.

S. Todd Hemphill, Diane E. Ricketts, Raleigh, for Amisub of NC.

Forrest W. Campbell, Jr., for NC Hospital Asso.

The following order has been entered on the consent motion filed on the 27th day of July 2006 by Respondent and Respondent Intervenors for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Respondent and Respondent Intervenors shall have up to and including the 15th day of August 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 31st day of July 2006."
STATE v. ANDERSON.

No. COA06-271.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 15, 2006.

Certification Date September 5, 2006.

Appeal from Harnett (05CRS51519, 05CRS51520).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Pension Partners 1994-B, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of operations con-
tained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,732
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  78,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               79,883
<PP&E>                                         3,758,953
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,529,546)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,309,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          154,252
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,155,038
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,309,290
<SALES>                                        197,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,650
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  117,254<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                45,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            45,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   45,246
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Roy Dean TEASTER.

No. 623P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Matthew D. Wunsche, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Roy Dean Teaster.

John Barkley, Assistant Attorney General, Jerry Wilson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 8th day of November 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of November 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*286"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Bureau of Industry and Security

The Transportation and Related Equipment Technical Advisory Committee will meet on September 7, 2005, 9:30 a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, Room 6087B, 14th Street between Pennsylvania and Constitution Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The Committee advises the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Export Administration with respect to technical questions that affect the level of export controls applicable to transportation and related equipment or technology.

*Agenda:*

1. Opening remarks and introductions.

2. Review of Bureau issues of significance to TRANSTAC members.

3. Regulatory Overview.

4. Policy issues.

5 Wassenaar proposal status.

6. Jurisdiction working group report.

7. Follow-up on open action items.

8. Focus on proposals for March 6 Wassenaar presentation.

                    The meeting will be open to the public and a limited number of seats will be available. Reservations are not accepted. To the extent time permits, member of the public may present oral statements to the Committee. Written statements may be submitted at any time before or after the meeting. However, to facilitate distribution of public presentation materials to the Committee members, the Committee suggests that you forward your public presentation materials to Yvette Springer at                     *Yspringer@bis.doc.gov*.                

For more information, call Ms. Springer on (202) 482-4814.

Dated: August 17, 2005.

Yvette Springer,

Committee Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 05-16686 Filed 8-22-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-JT-M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6158

ANTHONY JOHNSON,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

 Respondent – Appellee,

and

BOBBY SHEARIN,

 Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District 

Judge. (8:10-cv-02527-DKS)

Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Edward John Kelley, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED