alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of KH Funding Company (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Robert L. Harris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Robert L. Harris                 
|                        |  | Robert L. Harris                     
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
# L_2014271DE.01010202.xml

| 12.9.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 271/102 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 271/102

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses 2013/755/EU des Rates vom 25. November 2013 über die Assoziierung der überseeischen Länder und Gebiete mit der Europäischen Union („Übersee-Assoziationsbeschluss“)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 344 vom 19. Dezember 2013
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 344 vom 19. Dezember 2013

Auf Seite 58, Anhang VI Titel VII Artikel 65 Absatz 3:

anstatt:

„(3)   Artikel 8 Absatz 3 Buchstabe b des vorliegenden Anhangs gilt ab 30. September 2015.“

muss es heißen:

„(3)   Artikel 8 Absatz 3 Buchstabe b des vorliegenden Anhangs gilt bis 30. September 2015.“

auf Seite 58, Anhang VI Titel VII Artikel 65 Absatz 5:

anstatt:

„(5)   Artikel 38 bis 50 und Artikel 57 bis 61 des vorliegenden Anhangs gelten bis 1. Januar 2017.“

muss es heißen:

„(5)   Artikel 38 bis 50 und Artikel 57 bis 61 des vorliegenden Anhangs gelten ab 1. Januar 2017.“

---
Filed 3/13/24 P. v. Holt CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on 

opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 

8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for 

purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, 

v.

JAHLIL HOLT,

Defendant and Appellant.

 B323311

 (Los Angeles County

 Super. Ct. No. SA100631)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los 

Angeles County, Lana Kim, Judge. Affirmed.

Evan D. Williams, under appointment by the Court of

Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.
2

On May 29, 2019, defendant Jahlil Holt (defendant) 

entered an AT&T retail store near Los Angeles International 

Airport carrying a duffle bag.

1

 He approached a store clerk 

standing behind the counter, displayed a gun, and escorted the 

clerk to the breakroom where another store employee was eating 

lunch. At gunpoint, defendant directed the two employees to the 

store’s safe room where he ordered them to open the safe and fill 

the duffle bag with cellular phones and other products. 

Defendant fled the store with the loaded duffle bag, and the 

authorities apprehended him shortly thereafter. 

Defendant was charged with two counts of robbery (Pen. 

Code, § 211). A trial jury found him guilty as charged. The trial 

court placed defendant on probation for three years, including a 

condition that he spend a year in county jail.

Defendant appealed from the judgment of conviction and 

this court appointed counsel to represent him. After examining 

the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues. On 

November 21, 2023, this court advised defendant he had 30 days 

to personally submit any contentions or issues he wanted us to 

consider. We received no response. 

We have examined the appellate record and are satisfied 

defendant’s attorney has complied with the responsibilities of 

counsel and no arguable issue exists. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 

1 During the course of the criminal proceedings below, 

defendant changed his name to Master Alexandria. To avoid any 

confusion at trial, defense counsel proposed that his client be 

referred to by his prior name. The trial court agreed. We adopt 

the same convention.
3

528 U.S. 259, 278-82; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 122-

24; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

BAKER, Acting P. J.

We concur:

KIM, J.

LEE, J.*

*

Judge of the San Bernardino County Superior Court, 

assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of 

the California Constitution.
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5667 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain entries of newspaper 

printing presses and components thereof. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2008 

Ms. SHEA-PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of certain 

entries of newspaper printing presses and components 

thereof. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LARGE NEWSPAPER PRINTING PRESSES AND 

4 COMPONENTS THEREOF. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, U.S. 

6 Customs and Border Protection shall, not later than 90 

7 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, liquidate 

8 or reliquidate entries from Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. 

9 of large newspaper printing presses and components there10 of, whether assembled or unassembled, during the period 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5667 IH

1 September 1, 1997, through August 31, 1998, at the anti2 dumping duty rate of 59.67 percent, in accordance with 

3 the final results of the changed circumstances review con4 ducted by the International Trade Administration of the 

5 Department of Commerce for such entries (Case No. A– 

6 588–837; 71 Fed. Reg. 11590; March 8, 2006), plus any 

7 applicable interest that is due. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 16, 2015

No. 04-15-00288-CV

Eduardo BENAVIDES,

Appellant

v.

Julia BENNETT,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-16084

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

On September 23, 2015, this court ordered appellant to file his appellate brief no later 

than October 5, 2015. Our order cautioned appellant that if he failed to file the brief by this date 

or failed to reasonably explain the reason for his failure to do so, this appeal would be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). Because appellant did not timely respond to 

our order, this court issued an opinion and judgment dismissing the appeal on October 14, 2015. 

However, the day before our opinion issued, appellant had filed a response to our September 23 

order in which he explained the delay in filing his brief and asking this court to accept an 

attached “letter brief” as his appellate brief.

We hereby WITHDRAW our opinion and judgment dated October 14, 2015 and GRANT 

appellant’s motion. 

Appellee’s brief is due no later than November 16, 2015.
It is so ORDERED on October 16, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

jlf/Inventory

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORMA LIZETH HERNANDEZCASTILLO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-71268

Agency No. A098-432-540

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009 ** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, AND TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Norma Lizeth Hernandez-Castillo, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision

FILED

NOV 30 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
jlf/Inventory 2 08-71268

affirming the immigration judge's decision denying her applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

("CAT"). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence, Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 742 (9th Cir. 2008), and we

deny the petition for review.

The record does not compel reversal of the IJ's conclusion that petitioner

failed to establish that she suffered at the hands of gang members in El Salvador on

account of a protected ground. See Ramos-Lopez v. Holder, 563 F.3d 855, 858-62

(9th Cir. 2009) (concluding that resistance to gang activity is not a particular social

group for the purpose of establishing nexus to a protected ground); MolinaMorales v. INS, 237 F.3d 1048, 1051-52 (9th Cir. 2001) (personal retribution is not

persecution on account of a protected ground). Accordingly, petitioner's asylum,

withholding of removal, and CAT claims fail.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2014 (the "Report") of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JAMES C. ZELTER, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





By: /s/ James C. ZelterName: James C. ZelterDate: February 5, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                       500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,522
<PP&E>                                           5,285
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,585
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,849
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,155
<BONDS>                                          1,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,187
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,239
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,849
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,283
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,095
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,482
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,613
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,613
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.64
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,862
<SECURITIES>                                    25,451
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,266
<ALLOWANCES>                                       332
<INVENTORY>                                     12,036
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                64,323
<PP&E>                                          33,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,383
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,110
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,383
<SALES>                                         61,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,093
<CGS>                                           31,586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,584<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    45<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,769
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,747
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,022
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,022
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .48
<FN>
<F1>RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
<F2>PROVISION FOR BAD DEBT
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-35366, 333-51176,and 333-108646) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-28277, 333-46691, 333-77961, 333-90091, 333-31026, 333-36374, 333-48844, 333-55092, 333-98779 and 333-101704) of Pumatech, Inc. of our report dated August 22, 2003, except forNote 17, which is as of October 20, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

San Jose, California 

October 20, 2003
IN RE T.M.B.

No. COA05-1653.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 3, 2006

Certification Date October 23, 2006.

Appeal from Haywood (05J53, 05J54)

Case reported without published opinion. Orders affirmed in part and dismissed in part; petition for writ of certiorari dismissed.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# <lliniteb**~tate~** 

# QCourt of**~peaI~** 

# for tbejfeberaI QCircuit

ELIZABETH B. COX, Petitioner, 

### v. OFFICE OF 

### PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

2011·3147 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. CH831E110319·I·1. 

### ON MOTION

ORDER Elizabeth B. Cox moves for leave to proceed in forma paupens. Upon consideration thereof, ITIs ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.COXV.DVA 

## JUl 62011 Date

cc: Elizabeth B. Cox ChristopherA. Bowen, Esq. s20 FOR THE COURT lsI Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2



### FILED 

### u.s. COURTOF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

### JUL 062011

JANHORBALY CLERK
Exhibit 32.2

TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TELETOUCH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (the Company) for the quarter ended February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Douglas E. Sloan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Report is in full compliances with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Douglas E. Sloan   
|Douglas E. Sloan       
|Chief Financial Officer
|July 6, 2009
SCOTT v. SCOTT.

No. COA05-803.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
Brenda UHRIG v. Douglas L. MADARAS.

No. 668P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

Gerald K. Robbins, Special Deputy Attorney General, Barry Master, IV, District Attorney, for Brenda Uhrig.

James J. Hugenschmidt, Asheville, for Douglas L. Madaras.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of December 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         252,874
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (50,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    529,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               981,933
<PP&E>                                         570,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (207,735)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,361,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          624,288
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,206
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,608,754)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,361,970
<SALES>                                        1,352,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,352,663
<CGS>                                          1,019,317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,360,267
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             397,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,424,125)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,424,125)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,424,125)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.86)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.86)
        


</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

135542 Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices

v SC: 135542 COA: 278045 Wayne CC: 04-005427-01 KEITH BRYAN MADDOX a/k/a KEITH MADDOX-EL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the December 14, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0828 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2008

Clerk
CITICORP TRUST BANK, FSB v. Mark VAUGHAN, Linda R. Vaughan, Randy Lee Hammitt and Sandra Marie Hammitt.

No. 475P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Randy Lee Hammitt, Pro Se.

*247William Walt Pettit, Charlotte, for Citicorp Trust Bank.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 26th day of August 2005 by Defendants (Randy and Sandra Hammitt) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
STATE v. Ronell Eugene JACKSON.

No. 258P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of May 2006 by Defendant for Appeal:

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of June 2006."