alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT KARM JIT SINGH GREWAL, Pe titione r, v. ERIC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 11-73331 Age n c y No. A076-378-504 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Oc tobe r 15, 2013 * * B e fore : FISHER , GOULD, a nd B YB EE, C irc uit Judge s. Ka rm jit Singh Grewa l, a

native and c i tiz e n

of India , pe titions for re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny i ng his motion to re ope n re m ova l proc e e d ings. Our jurisdiction is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for a b use of disc re tion theB IA’ s de nia l of a m otion to re ope n. N

ajmabadi v . 

# FIL ED OCT 22 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th C ir. 2010) . W e de ny in pa rt a nd dismiss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing Gre wa l’ s untim e ly m otion to re ope n be c a use it c o n side re d the re c ord a nd a c te d within its disc

re t ion in de te rm i ning tha

t the e vide nc e wa s insuffic ie nt to e sta blish prima

fa c ie e ligibility for the re lie f sought. Se eToufighi v . Muk ase y , 538 F.3d 988, 995-97 (9th C ir. 2008) (re quiring mo v ant to e sta blish prima fa c ie e ligibility for re lie f a

nd disc ussing c onse q ue nc e s of la c k of c re d ibility ); C olev . Holde r , 659 F.3d 762, 771 (9th C ir. 2011). In light of our c onc lusion, wedo not re a c h Gre wa l’ s c o nte ntion re ga rding a la c k of tim e lim its for filing a m otion to re ope n to a

pply for re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture(“ C AT” ). Se e 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(2). W e re je c t Gre wa l’ s c onte ntion tha

t the a ge nc y

did not a d e quat e ly

e x a m i ne his e v ide nc e . Se e Fe rnande z v . Gonzale

s , 439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th C ir. 2006) (pe titione r did not ove rc o m e the pre s um

ption tha t the B IA re v ie we d

the re c ord). W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r Gre w a l’ s c ha lle nge to thede n ia l of c anc e lla tion of re m ova l b a se d on a c la im of e xc e ptiona l a

nd e xtre m e ly

unusua l ha rdship. Se eid. W e a lso la c k jurisdic tion ove r Gre wa l’ s une xha uste d c ha lle nge

1 1 - 7 3 3 3 1 2to the a ge nc y ’ s fa ilure to c onside r his e ligibility for C A T re lie f in the unde rly ing proc e e dings. Se eBarron v . Ashc roft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th C ir. 2004). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 1 - 7 3 3 3 1 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7190

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus THOMAS ANTHONY BURRESS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CR-97-3-1; CR-92-16; CA-02-19-7) Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 5, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Anthony Burress, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Ray Wolthuis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We note that Burress’ claim pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), is not cognizable on collateral review. United States v. Sanders , 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir. 2001). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Thomas Anthony Burress seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burress has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U. S. 322, 336 (2003). * Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE v. Russell William TUCKER.

No. 113A96-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 23, 2006.

Robert L. McClellan, Greensboro, for Tucker.

Danielle Marquis, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of June 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of June 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from American
International Consolidated, Inc. and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>           
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS            
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997        
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997        
<CASH>                                             160        
<SECURITIES>                                         0        
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,686        
<ALLOWANCES>                                        41        
<INVENTORY>                                          0        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,297        
<PP&E>                                           2,075        
<DEPRECIATION>                                     943        
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,692        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,242        
<BONDS>                                              0        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0        
<PREFERRED>                                          0        
<COMMON>                                             3        
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,170)        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,692        
<SALES>                                         33,350        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,350        
<CGS>                                           31,388        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,388        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,759        
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   428        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 308        
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,533)        
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,533)        
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,664)        
<CHANGES>                                            0        
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,197)        
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.45)        
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.45)        
        


</TABLE>
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 12, 2019

NO. 03

- 17

- 00533

- CR

Richard David Mason, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TR IANA, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the p arties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because a ppellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs

is made.
STATE v. Paul Dewayne CUMMINGS.

No. 1A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2006.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Amy Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of June 2006 by Defendant:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Paul Dewayne Cummings) shall have up to and including the 12th day of July 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of June 2006."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,717
<SECURITIES>                                    13,285
<RECEIVABLES>                                   86,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,375
<INVENTORY>                                     18,607
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,571
<PP&E>                                          43,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 243,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,201
<BONDS>                                         39,257
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           207
<OTHER-SE>                                     140,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   243,722
<SALES>                                        247,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,192
<CGS>                                          159,187
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                62,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,199
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,881
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,466
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,325)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    13,089
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. JOYNER.

No. COA05-1124.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 1, 2006.

Certification Date August 21, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (03CRS54523, 03CRS54524, 03CRS54525).

Case without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           10688
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             348
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      32736
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            5998
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              5904
<LOANS>                                         359068
<ALLOWANCE>                                       4098
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  422530
<DEPOSITS>                                      300095
<SHORT-TERM>                                     75066
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              11109
<LONG-TERM>                                       6956
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            34
<OTHER-SE>                                       29270
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  422530
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  15149
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1458
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   147
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 16754
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                7705
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10170
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             6548
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      201
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  94
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   5099
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2255
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2255
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1420
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.20
<LOANS-NON>                                        618
<LOANS-PAST>                                       263
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   3082
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  3999
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   99
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              4098
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           4098
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,137
<SECURITIES>                                    16,277
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                       362
<INVENTORY>                                     12,560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,463
<PP&E>                                          36,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,627
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,775
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,240
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      76,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,775
<SALES>                                         19,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,710
<CGS>                                           10,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,998
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,139
<INCOME-TAX>                                       644
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,495
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,495
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE**
 **SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002**
 
 I, Thomas
B. Specketer, Vice President and Controller of MidAmerican Energy Company (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
    the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
      U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 
 Dated:
May 6, 2005
 
 
 /s/
Thomas B. Specketer
 Thomas B.
Specketer
 Vice
President and Controller
 (chief
financial officer)
STATE v. LEE.

No. COA05-276.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (03CRS39203, 03CRS39204)

Case without published opinion. No error.
ARIZONA 

ηϭϭ

Ψϭρ͘ϭ^WEd/E

ηϭϯ

κ͘ϬйK&^dd'W

Ϯ͘ϳй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

ΨϮ͕Ϭϳς

PER RESIDENT 

ηϭϬ

ΨϭϮ͘εKEdZd

ηϭε

κκ͕ϳϯϳEhDZK&

ηϮϬ

$2.2 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐĂŶĚ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ςϭй

By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

Air Force 

12% 

Other Defense 

13% 

ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ ϭςй

25% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Reserve: 17% 

National 

Guard: 17% 

Civilian: 22% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

15% 

Air Force 

Other Defense 

3% 

ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ

ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ Θй

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ ϭρй

49% 

Active Duty: 44% 

38% 

43% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ZĂLJƚŚĞŽŶ Ψκ͘Θ

ŽĞŝŶŐ Ψϭ͘Θ

^ŽƵƚŚǁĞƐƚsĂůůĞLJŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŽƌƐŽ͘ Ψϭ͘Ϯ

,ŽŶĞLJǁĞůů Ψεκρ͘ΘD

ĂƌŶĂƌĚŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶŽ͘/ŶĐ͘ Ψςϳϯ͘ϮD

EŽƌƚŚƌŽƉ'ƌƵŵŵĂŶ Ψςκϭ͘ϬD

'ĞŶĞƌĂůLJŶĂŵŝĐƐ ΨϮΘϳ͘κD

,/K Ψϭρς͘ςD

dƌĂdž/ŶƚĞƌŶĂƟŽŶĂů ΨϭϬϭ͘ϬD

WĂƚƌŝĂƌĐŚWĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ Ψεϭ͘ςD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ΨϭϮ͘ε Ψϭϭ͘ε ΨϭϮ͘ϭ

&zϭϮ

ΨϭϬ͘Θ

&zϭϯ

ΨΘ͘ε ΨΘ͘ε ΨΘ͘Ϯ

&zϭκ

Ψς͘κ

&zϭρ &zϭς &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$2.2 BILLION κκ͕ϳϯϳ

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

ĐƟǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

ρ͕ϮϬε Ϯ͕ρϭς ϯ͕κςρ

ς͕ϭκκ Ϯ͕ΘϮς Ϯ͕Ϯκκ

κ͕ϭϬϭ Ϯ͕ϳϮρ κϮ

ϯ͕ςκϬ ϭ͕ϯϯρ ςϭ

Ϭ ϭεΘ ϭ͕ϮρΘ

ϭϳ κς κϮϬ

E E ϭϳρ

Ϭ Ϭ κϬ

Ϭ E ϯϭ

ϭε Ϭ Ϭ

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

ρ͕ϮϮς ϭς͕κϭς

ϭ͕ςρϮ ϭϮ͕Θςς

ϭεϮ ϳ͕ϬςϬ

ϯϭ ρ͕Ϭςϳ

ρκϬ ϭ͕εες

E E

Ϭ E

Ϭ κϬ

Ϭ E

Ϭ ϭε

ŽƵŶƚLJ

DĂƌŝĐŽƉĂ

WŝŵĂ

ŽĐŚŝƐĞ

zƵŵĂ

WŝŶĂů

ŽĐŽŶŝŶŽ

zĂǀĂƉĂŝ

'ƌĂŚĂŵ

EĂǀĂũŽ

ƉĂĐŚĞ

22 KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CARIZONA AL YEAR 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

EĂǀĂũŽƉĂĐŚĞ

'ƌĂŚĂŵ

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

ŽĐŽŶŝŶŽ

DŽŚĂǀĞ

zĂǀĂƉĂŝ

>ĂWĂnj

DĂƌŝĐŽƉĂ

zƵŵĂ WŝŶĂů

WŝŵĂ

ŽĐŚŝƐĞ

^ĂŶƚĂƌƵnj

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (<сƚŚŽƵƐĂŶĚƐ͕DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

WŝŵĂ

DĂƌŝĐŽƉĂ

zƵŵĂ

ŽĐŚŝƐĞ

zĂǀĂƉĂŝ

WŝŶĂů

ŽĐŽŶŝŶŽ

DŽŚĂǀĞ

^ĂŶƚĂƌƵnj

>ĂWĂnj

;<сƚŚŽƵƐĂŶĚƐ͕DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψς͘ς

Ψκ͘ς

Ψεϯε͘ϬD

ΨΘϬΘ͘ςD

ΨϭΘ͘ΘD

Ψϭς͘ϬD

ΨϭϬ͘ρD

Ψϭ͘ΘD

Ψρρϯ͘Ϯ<

Ψϯϯε͘ϯ<

DĂƌŝĐŽƉĂ

WŝŵĂ

ŽĐŚŝƐĞ

zƵŵĂ

WŝŶĂů

ŽĐŽŶŝŶŽ

zĂǀĂƉĂŝ

EĂǀĂũŽ

ƉĂĐŚĞ

'ƌĂŚĂŵ

Ψϳϭρ͘ϮD

ΨςϳΘ͘ϭD

ΨκκϬ͘κD

ΨϮκϬ͘ϭD

ΨρΘ͘κD

Ψϭρ͘ϮD

Ψρ͘ϬD

Ψϳϳρ͘ϯ<

Ψϳςρ͘ϭ<

ΨρϳϮ͘Θ<

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

ŽĐŽŶŝŶŽ

DĂƌŝĐŽƉĂ

zƵŵĂ WŝŶĂů

WŝŵĂ

ŽĐŚŝƐĞ

zĂǀĂƉĂŝ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε Ϯϯ
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 130 (Friday, July 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40873-40874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14536]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. FD 36624]


Mountain Pacific Railroad LLC--Lease and Operation Exemption--
Moss Landing Commercial Park LLC at Moss Landing, Monterey County, Cal.

    Mountain Pacific Railroad LLC (MPR), a noncarrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.31 to acquire by lease 
and operate approximately 6,818.7 feet of track, totaling 1.29 miles, 
located at Moss Landing Commercial Park, LLC (MLCP), Moss Landing, 
Monterey County, Cal. (the Line).
    According to MPR, the Line is currently private track owned by 
MLCP. MPR states that it has entered into a lease agreement with MLCP 
under which MPR will operate and provide all rail common carrier 
service on the Line. The verified notice indicates that initial 
operations will consist of transloading propane from railcars into 
truck for local delivery.
    MPR certifies that its projected annual revenues from this 
transaction will not result in its becoming a Class I or Class II rail 
carrier and will not exceed $5 million. MPR also certifies that the 
proposed transaction does not include an interchange commitment.
    The transaction may be consummated on or after July 23, 2022, the 
effective date of the exemption (30 days after the verified notice was 
filed).
    If the verified notice contains false or misleading information, 
the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the exemption 
under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. The filing of a 
petition to revoke will not automatically stay the effectiveness of the 
exemption. Petitions for stay must be filed no later than July 15, 2022 
(at least seven days before the exemption becomes effective).
    All pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD 36624, must be filed with 
the Surface Transportation Board either via e-filing on the Board's 
website or in writing addressed to 395 E Street SW, Washington, DC 
20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each pleading must be served on 
MPR's representative, Thomas F. McFarland, Thomas F.

[[Page 40874]]

McFarland, P.C., 2230 Marston Lane, Flossmoor, IL 60422-1336.
    According to MPR, this action is categorically excluded from 
environmental review under 49 CFR 1105.6(c) and from historic 
preservation reporting requirements under 49 CFR 1105.8(b).
    Board decisions and notices are available at www.stb.gov.

    Decided: June 30, 2022.

    By the Board, Mai T. Dinh, Director, Office of Proceedings.
Eden Besera,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2022-14536 Filed 7-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P