alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Certification of CFO



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of KH Funding Company (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Louise B. Sehman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (3) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (4) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                 
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Dated May 20, 2005 |  | /s/ Louis B. Sehman                             
|                   |  | Louise B. Sehman                                
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such
Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



23
#### In the Matter of Lois Phillips, Appellant, v Suffolk County Board of Elections et al., Respondents, and Michael J. Caracciolo, Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 751]

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Michael J. Caracciolo as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2005, for the nomination of the Independence Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the Assembly, First Assembly District, the petitioner appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), dated August 4, 2005, as denied that branch of the petition which was to invalidate the designating petition on the ground that Michael J. Caracciolo circulated designating petitions for incompatible offices and dismissed that portion of the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements *(see Matter of Phillips v Suffolk County Bd. of Elections,*21 AD3d 509 [2005] [decided herewith]). H. Miller, J.P., S. Miller, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAKELL ADIMU BELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 185 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of August, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-10908

Summary Calendar

____________

Benny R. Odem, Jr., 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Frances M. Odom, Unit Property Officer; Kelly M. Brown, Unit 

Property Officer; Samantha K. Sullivan, AD Review (Investigator 2), 

Defendants—Appellees.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:20-CV-42

______________________________

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Benny Odem, Jr., an inmate incarcerated by the Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice, appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his 

complaint for failure to state a claim, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

12(b)(6). 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 7, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10908 Document: 00516778298 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2023
No. 22-10908

2

In his complaint, Odem alleged that three Texas Department of 

Criminal Justice employees deprived him of due process, confiscated or 

destroyed several items of his personal property, and did not properly handle 

his grievance regarding the confiscation of his property. As the district court 

determined, Texas provides an adequate post-deprivation remedy for loss of 

property, so Odem’s property deprivation claim, even when taken as true, 

fails to state a constitutional violation. Murphy v. Collins, 26 F.3d 541, 543-

44 (5th Cir. 1994). Odem also had no federally protected interest in having 

his grievance resolved to his satisfaction. Hill v. Walker, 718 F. Appx. 243, 

250 (5th Cir. 2018) (citing Geiger v. Jowers, 404 F.3d 371, 373-374 (5th Cir. 

2005).

This court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs 

and pertinent portions of the record. Having found no reversible error, we 

AFFIRM.

Case: 22-10908 Document: 00516778298 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2023
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5601 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

7925 West Russell Road in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ‘‘Sergeant Irving 

Joseph Schwartz Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 12, 2008 

Mr. PORTER (for himself and Ms. BERKLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7925 West Russell Road in Las Vegas, Nevada, as the ‘‘Sergeant Irving Joseph Schwartz Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT IRVING JOSEPH SCHWARTZ POST 

4 OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 7925 West Russell Road in Las 

7 Vegas, Nevada, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Sergeant Irving Joseph Schwartz Post Office Building’’. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5601 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Irving Jo5 seph Schwartz Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration 

          - 14 CFR Part 93 
          - [Docket No. FAA-2004-17005; Notice No. 05-07] 
          - RIN 2120-AI17 

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration, DOT. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction. 

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects the docket number and an incorrect reference in the proposed rule, “Washington, DC Metropolitan Area Special Flight Rules Area,” published in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 4, 2005.                     

# DATES:

The comment period will close on November 2, 2005. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Crum, Airspace and Rules, Office of System Operations and Safety; telephone (202-267-8783). 

## Correction 

                        In FR Doc. 05-15375 beginning on page 45250 in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 4, 2005, make the following corrections.                     

1. On page 45250, in the first column, in the fourth line of the heading, “Docket No. FAA-2003-17005” should have read, “Docket No. FAA-2004-17005.” 

                        2. On page 45250, in the first column, in the                         **“ADDRESSES”**                         paragraph, in the third and fourth lines, “identified by Docket Number FAA-2003-17005” should have read, “identified by Docket Number FAA-2004-17005.”                     

3. On page 45250, in the third column, under “Sensitive Security Information,” in the fourth and fifth lines, “(identified as docket number FAA-2003-17005)” should have read, “(identified as docket number FAA-2004-17005).” 

§ 93.43 

4. On page 45261, in the center column, in § 93.43(a)(1), “49 U.S.C. 1562 subpart A” should have read, “49 CFR part 1562 subpart A.” 

Issued in Washington, DC, on August 19, 2005. 

Anthony F. Fazio, 

Director, Office of Rulemaking. 

[FR Doc. 05-16781 Filed 8-23-05; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
STATE v. William Henry RAINES.

No. 211A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2006.

C.C. Walker, Assistant District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of August 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Serve Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and Including the 1st day of September 2006 to serve his/her proposed record upon the district attorney. The parties shall then proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12. By order of the Court in conference this the 18th day of August 2006."
Exhibit 32

ArQule, Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

The undersigned, Paolo Pucci, Chief Executive Officer of ArQule, Inc. (the "Company") and Peter S. Lawrence, President and Chief
Operating Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, both duly elected and currently serving, do each hereby certify that, to the best of his/her knowledge:



This
certification accompanies the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "2002 Act") and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.

This
certification is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company with the
requirements of Section 906 of the 2002 Act, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other than as specifically required by law.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the 2nd day of March 2010.

/s/ PAOLO PUCCIName:

Paolo PucciTitle:

Chief Executive Officer/s/ PETER S. LAWRENCEName:

Peter S. LawrenceTitle:

President and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 4, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-15-00472-CV LESLEY TEMPLETON, Appellant V. BLAKE PATTERSON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-06506-E



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Myers Opinion by Justice Bridges Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue . By postcard dated September 02, 2015, we notified appellant the time for filing her brief had e xpired. We informed appellant to file both her brief and an extension motion within ten days that complies with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a) and 10.5(b). Appellant was cau tioned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appe llant has not filed her brief, requested an extension of time to file her brief, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. Furthermore, by postcards dated April 14, 2014 and July 29, 2015 we notified appellant that the $195 filing fee was due. On both occasions , we directed appellant to remit the filing fee–2– within ten days and cautioned that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. To date, appell ant has not paid the filing fee. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b)(c).

150472F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
LESLEY TEMPLETON, Appellant
No. 05-15-00472-CV V. BLAKE PATTERSON, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-06506-E. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Justices Francis and Myers participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.
We ORDER appellee BLAKE PATTERSON recover his costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant LESLEY TEMPLETON.
Judgment entered November 4, 2015.
Exhibit 32
                                   ----------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB for the quarter
ended April 30, 2004 (the  "Report") of SE Financial  Corp.  (the  "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, I, Pamela
M.  Cyr,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Executive  and  Financial &  Accounting  Officer),  hereby  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 10, 2005                   /s/ Pamela M. Cyr
      -------------                   ------------------------------------------
                                      Pamela M. Cyr
                                      President, CEO and Chief Financial Officer
                                      (Principal Executive and Financial &
                                      Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF T/F PURIFINER, INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1996 , AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS             
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           928,960 
<SECURITIES>                                           0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                    166,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                      40,000
<INVENTORY>                                      440,239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2,555,636 
<PP&E>                                           300,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (128,201)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,039,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            827,703     
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0 
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           5,097     
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,809,491   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,039,680
<SALES>                                        1,327,230
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,327,230
<CGS>                                            956,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    956,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,330,361                                      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                25,354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,983,270)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,983,270) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,983,270)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.60)  

        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles WALKER.

No. 76A95-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 5, 2006.

Paul M. Green, Durham, Jonathan L. Megerian, Asheboro, for Charles Walker.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 14th day of July 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Guilford County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 2006."
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT
CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JAMES C. ZELTER, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|      |  |                       
|----- |  | ----------------------
|      |  | /s/    JAMES C. ZELTER
|Name: |  | James C. Zelter       
|Date: |  | February 5, 2009
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6289
ANTHONY RAY THOMPSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus COMMONWE ALTH OF VIRGINIA; BRUCE C. MORRIS; SANDRA L. COMBS; WINNIE R. DIXON; JOSEPH F. LEWIS; LINDA R. PITMAN, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-96-162-R) Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 1, 1996 Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Ray Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d)(1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. Virginia , No. CA-96- 162-R (W.D. Va. Feb. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     EXHIBIT 11
                                 Lason, Inc.
                Computation of Consolidated Per Share Earnings
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)



                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                    -------------------------
                                                        1996          1995
                                                    -----------    ----------
Net income                                               $3,731        $2,014
                                                    ===========    ==========
Primary and Fully Diluted
   weighted average common shares outstanding             5,815         5,000

Assumed exercise of stock options using
   the treasury stock method                                403           500

Common shares redeemed on October 15, 1996                  546           692

Weighted average common shares outstanding
  and common share equivalents for pimary           -----------    ----------
  and fully diluted earnings per share                    6,764         6,192
                                                    ===========    ==========

Earnings per share                                        $0.55         $0.33
                                                    ===========    ==========
SUBLEASE EXTENTION AGREEMENT


Allstar Systems, Inc.  ("Sublessee") and Allstar Equities,  Inc.  ("Sublessor"),
hereby, as of December 31, 1998, agree to extend that certain SUBLEASE AGREEMENT
entered  into on August 2,  1996,  but made  effective  January  1, 1996 for the
property  situated in Harris  County,  Texas,  commonly  known as 6401 Southwest
Freeway, Houston, Texas.

Both parties  hereto  hereby agree to extend the term of the SUBLEASE  AGREEMENT
for one year, with the sublease hereby extended  through  December 31, 1999. All
other terms,  conditions,  and rental  payments of the SUBLEASE  AGREEMENT shall
remain the same as those set forth in the SUBLEASE AGREEMENT.


Allstar Systems, Inc.                       Allstar Equities, Inc.



-------------------------------             -------------------------------

Donald L. Chadwick                          James H. Long
Chief Financial Officer                     President
December 31, 1998                           December 31, 1998