alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5384 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5384

           To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,2 Hexanediol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1,2 HEXANEDIOL.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       1,2 Hexanediol      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (CAS No. 6920-22-                                                  31/2011.......
                          5) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2905.39.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00062-CV

In re Cori Leigh Ice

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relator Cori Leigh Ice has filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion to

stay the final hearing set for March 20, 2010. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8, 52.10. Having reviewed the

petition, motion, and applicable law, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus and overrule the

motion to stay.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Puryear and Waldrop

Filed: March 16, 2010
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (1)




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, the following certification is being made to accompany
      Catskill  Litigation Trust’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
      period ended September 30, 2007;




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Catskill Litigation Trust on Form 10-QSB
      for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul deBary, Acting
      Chief Financial Officer of the Catskill  Litigation Trust, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
                15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                amended;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Catskill  Litigation
                Trust.






/s/
              Paul
              deBaryName:
            Paul
                deBaryTitle:
            Acting
                Chief Financial OfficerDate:
            November
                19, 2007





(1)
            A
                signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
                has been
                provided to Catskill Litigation Trust and will be retained by Catskill
                Litigation Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
                or its staff upon request.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
      U.S.C.  Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or
      as a separate disclosure document.
# L_2016254EN.01000501.xml

| 20.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 254/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 254/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1676

of 7 September 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Saucisson sec d'Auvergne/Saucisse sèche d'Auvergne (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Saucisson sec d'Auvergne’/‘Saucisse sèche d'Auvergne’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Saucisson sec d'Auvergne’/‘Saucisse sèche d'Auvergne’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Saucisson sec d'Auvergne’/‘Saucisse sèche d'Auvergne’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Saucisson sec d'Auvergne’/‘Saucisse sèche d'Auvergne’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Saucisson sec d'Auvergne’/‘Saucisse sèche d'Auvergne’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 September 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 160, 4.5.2016, p. 14.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
## Court of Appeals

Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler



## B I L L O F C O S T S

Court of Appeals No. 12-14-00346-CV

Trial Court No. 13-CV-32,414

William Robert Parker

Vs.

Robert Pigg and John Preston Manuell Jr.

DOCUMENTS FILED AMOUNT FEE PAID BY

Required Texas.gov efiling fee

Indigent

Filing

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee $20.00

$25.00

$100.00

$50.00 Dismissed, not paid

Dismissed, not paid

Dismissed, not paid

Dismissed, not paid

TOTAL: $195.00

I, Cathy S. Lusk, Clerk of the Court of Appeals, Twelfth Court of Appeals District at Tyler,

Texas, certify that the above copy of the Bill of Costs is true and correct. GIVEN UNDER MY

HAND AND SEAL OF SAID COURT, at Tyler, this 17th day of February 2015

, A.D.

CATHY LUSK, CLERK

By:

_____________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk
STATE v. Vonderick LANGLEY.

No. 535P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 28, 2005.

Lemuel W. Hinton, for Vonderick Langley.

Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of September 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 28th day of September 2005."
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JOHN J. HANNAN, the
Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ JOHN J. HANNAN    
|Name: John J. Hannan  
|Date: February 5, 2008
# L_2015196DE.01006802.xml

| 24.7.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 196/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 196/68

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 267/2012 des Rates vom 23. März 2012 über restriktive Maßnahmen gegen Iran und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 961/2010

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 88 vom 24. März 2012
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 88 vom 24. März 2012

Auf Seite 22, Anhang II, Tabelle II.A „Güter“, Abschnitt A0 „Kerntechnische Materialien, Anlagen und Ausrüstung“, Zeile IIA.A0.006:

anstatt:

| „IIA.A0.006 | Nukleare Nachweissysteme zum Nachweis, zur Identifizierung und zur Quantifizierung radioaktiver Stoffe oder von Kernstrahlung und besonders konstruierte Bestandteile hierfür, soweit nicht in den Unternummern 0A001j und 1A004c erfasst. | 0A001j
  1A004c“ |
| --- | --- | --- |

„IIA.A0.006

Nukleare Nachweissysteme zum Nachweis, zur Identifizierung und zur Quantifizierung radioaktiver Stoffe oder von Kernstrahlung und besonders konstruierte Bestandteile hierfür, soweit nicht in den Unternummern 0A001j und 1A004c erfasst.

0A001j

1A004c“

muss es heißen:

| „IIA.A0.006 | Nukleare Nachweissysteme zum Nachweis, zur Identifizierung oder zur Quantifizierung radioaktiver Stoffe oder von Kernstrahlung und besonders konstruierte Bestandteile hierfür, soweit nicht in den Unternummern 0A001j und 1A004c erfasst. | 0A001j
  1A004c“ |
| --- | --- | --- |

„IIA.A0.006

Nukleare Nachweissysteme zum Nachweis, zur Identifizierung oder zur Quantifizierung radioaktiver Stoffe oder von Kernstrahlung und besonders konstruierte Bestandteile hierfür, soweit nicht in den Unternummern 0A001j und 1A004c erfasst.

0A001j

1A004c“

---
Order entered November 16, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 22

- 00695

- CR

DARIOUS DANTREL LEWIS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the C riminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 20

- 75804

- H

O RDER

Before the Court is th e November 15, 2022 request of court reporter Cheryl

A. Dixon for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the

request and ORDER the reporter’s record filed by November 29 , 2022

.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129745 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. DETROIT BUILDING AUTHORITY, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff/Cross Defendant- Justices Appellant,

and

CITY OF DETROIT, Intervening Pl aintiff/CounterPlaintiff/Cross PlaintiffAppellee,

v SC: 129745 COA: 253479 WAYNE COUNTY TREASURER, Wayne CC: 02-234701-CH Defendant/Cross Defendant/ Counter Defendant-Appellee,

and

MICHIGAN FINANCIAL INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., Intervening Defendant/CrossPlaintiff/Counter DefendantAppellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

By order of March 27, 2006 , the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals was he ld in abeyance pendi ng the decision in In re Petition by Treasurer of Wayn e County for Foreclosure (Docket No. 129341). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on May 23, 2 007, 478 Mich 1 (2007), the application is again considered and, pursuan t to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgme nt of the Court of Appeals and we
REINSTATE the order of the Wayne County Circuit Court setting aside the foreclosure sale and quieting title to the pr operty in the plaintiff. The foreclosure sale of publicly owned property is prohibited. MCL 211.78g(1). Contrary to the Court of Appeals majority's conclusion, the Wa yne County Treasurer had reason to know that the property was publicly owned because there is no disp ute that the plaintiff Detroit Building_______________________________________ __ 2

Authority, which was in corporated by the in tervening plaintiff C ity of Detroit, MCL 123.951, was the owner of reco rd and had filed both a deed and an affidavit of property transfer notifying the co unty that the property was tax exempt.

M ARKMAN , J., concurs and states as follows:

I concur in the decision to reverse the C ourt of Appeals; however, I would do so on different grounds. It is undisputed that th e city of Detroit was the taxpayer of record
in the local assessor’s office at the time of the foreclosure. Because the city's interest was “identifiable by reference to . . . [t]ax records in the office of the local assessor,” MCL 211.78i(6)(c), the Wayne County Treasurer was required to se nd notice by certified mail. MCL 211.78i(2). Moreover, be cause the city's interest was “reasonably identifiable”
under the records of the local assessor, merely posting a fo reclosure notice and publishing
such notice in a news paper was not constitutionally adequate. Mennonite Bd of Missions
v Adams , 462 US 791, 798-799 (1983). Accord ingly, the Court of Appeals erred by concluding that the treasu rer "afforded the City the required due process.”

l0925 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2007

Clerk
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media West LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: August 1, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Steven M. BlondySteven M. BlondyExecutive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer 31
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**OMAR SHARIFF BEST,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 59 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 10th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
# L_2017002EN.01000101.xml

| 5.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 2/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 2/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2017/3

of 19 December 2016

on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak for vessels flying the flag of Denmark, Norway and Sweden

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2), in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Council Decision 2014/505/EU (2) the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak for vessels flying the flag of Denmark, Norway and Sweden (‘the Agreement’) was signed on 15 January 2015, subject to its conclusion at a later date. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Council Decision 2014/505/EU (2) the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak for vessels flying the flag of Denmark, Norway and Sweden (‘the Agreement’) was signed on 15 January 2015, subject to its conclusion at a later date.

| (2) | The Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Agreement should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak for vessels flying the flag of Denmark, Norway and Sweden is hereby approved on behalf of the Union (3).

Article 2

The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 7 of the Agreement (4).

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2016.

For the Council

The President

L. SÓLYMOS

---

(1)  Consent of 12 December 2016 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  Council Decision 2014/505/EU of 23 July 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Norway on reciprocal access to fishing in the Skagerrak for vessels flying the flag of Denmark, Norway and Sweden (OJ L 224, 30.7.2014, p. 1).

2

(3)  The Agreement has been published in OJ L 224, 30.7.2014, p. 3, together with the decision on signature and provisional application.

3

(4)  The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.

4

Official Journal of the European Union

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5395 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 846
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5395

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 10, 2008

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             June 25, 2008

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``William `Bill' 
                      Clay Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILLIAM ``BILL'' CLAY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``William `Bill' Clay Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William 
`Bill' Clay Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 846

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5395

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``William `Bill' 
                      Clay Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 25, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
# L_2016045EN.01004401.xml

| 20.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 45/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 45/44

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/236 of 18 February 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 44 of 19 February 2016
  )

On page 10, the table in the Annex, for CN code ‘0709 93 10’, in the column ‘Standard import value’ for third country code ‘TR’ (Turkey):

for:

‘164,5’,

read:

‘165,4’.

---
STATE v. RICHARDSON

No. COA05-513.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (04CRS15863, 04CRS15864, 04CRS50391, 04CRS50392).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
GOOD HOPE v. NCDHHS.

No. 58A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 20, 2006.

Maureen D. Murray, Susan M. Fradenburg, Greensboro, William W. Stewart, Jr., Raleigh, for Good Hope Health System.

C. Winston Gilchrist, Lillington, for Town of Lillington.

Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Marcus Lodge, for NCDHHS.

Noah H. Huffstetler, III, Wallace C. Hollowell, III, Benjamin N. Thompson, K. Edward Greene, Kathleen A. Naggs, Raleigh, Denise M. Gunther, Winston-Salem, for Betsy Johnson Regional Hosp.

S. Todd Hemphill, Diane E. Ricketts, Raleigh, for Amisub of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of February 2006 by NC Hospital Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 20th day of February 2006."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

GEORGE DRUCK,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 459 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED.