alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012219EN.01000101.xml

| 17.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 219/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 742/2012

of 16 August 2012

implementing Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 (1), and in particular Article 32(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 January 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 36/2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 January 2012, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.

| (2) | In accordance with Council Implementing Decision 2012/478/CFSP of 16 August 2012 implementing Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (2), an additional entity should be included in the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Council Implementing Decision 2012/478/CFSP of 16 August 2012 implementing Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (2), an additional entity should be included in the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The entity listed in the Annex to this Regulation shall be added to the list set out in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 36/2012.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 August 2012.

For the Council

The President

A. D. MAVROYIANNIS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 16, 19.1.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  See page 21 of this Official Journal.

2

---

ANNEX

ENTITY REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1

Entity

| | Name | Identifying information | Reasons | Date of listing |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | Drex Technologies Holding S.A. | Registered in Luxembourg under number B77616, formerly established at the following address: 17, rue Beaumont L-1219 Luxembourg. | The beneficial owner of Drex Technologies Holding S.A. is Rami Makhlouf, who is listed under EU sanctions for providing financial support to the Syrian regime. | 16.8.2012 |

Name

Identifying information

Reasons

Date of listing

1.

Drex Technologies Holding S.A.

Registered in Luxembourg under number B77616, formerly established at the following address: 17, rue Beaumont L-1219 Luxembourg.

The beneficial owner of Drex Technologies Holding S.A. is Rami Makhlouf, who is listed under EU sanctions for providing financial support to the Syrian regime.

16.8.2012

---
STATE v. Calvin WILSON, Jr.

No. 27P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of January 2006 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review G.S. 7A-31":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of April 2006."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5338 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) 

butyric acid and 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid, dimethylamine salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mrs. BIGGERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-(2,4- 

dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid and 4-(2,4- 

dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid, dimethylamine salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-(2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXY) BUTYRIC ACID AND 

4 4-(2,4-DICHLOROPHENOXY) BUTYRIC ACID, DI5 METHYLAMINE SALT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.26 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid and 4-(2,4- 

9 dichlorophenoxy) butyric acid, dimethylamine salt) is 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5338 IH

1 amended by striking the date in the effective period col2 umn and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
STATE v. CRAWFORD.

No. COA05-574.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Moore (03CRS6364, 03CRS6365, 03CRS6366).

Case reported without published opinion. No error, remanded for resentencing.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-11230 Summary Calendar

GARY REED WALP, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, Chairman, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CV-2311-H

- - - - - - - - - - April 8, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Gary Reed Walp, Texas prisoner #314299, requests permission to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. He argues that the district court erred by construing his pleading as one brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 rather than as one brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because Walp challenges the duration of his sentence following the revocation of his parole, his challenge properly sounds in habeas. Orellana v. Kyle , 65 F.3d 29, 31 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied , 116 S. Ct. 736 (1996). Accordingly,No. 97-11230 -2- the district court did not err by construing Walp’s pleading as one brought pursuant to § 2254, and Walp’s assertion to the contrary is without merit. Because his appeal is without merit, it is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Walp’s motion for IFP is DENIED. Walp is cautioned that future frivolous civil suits and appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. Walp is cautioned further to review any pending suits and appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; IFP DENIED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14783]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XC167]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Spiny Dogfish 
Advisory Panel will hold a public meeting. See SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION for agenda details.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Thursday, July 28, 2022, from 3 p.m. 
until 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information 
will be posted to the calendar prior to the meeting at www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the meeting is for the 
Advisory Panel to create a Fishery Performance Report that includes 
advisor input on related specifications and management measures.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: July 7, 2022.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-14783 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
### NUMBER 13 - 1 8 - 00 025 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE PABLO RAY BENITEZ

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Contreras and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides 1
On January 11, 2018 , Pablo Ray Benitez , p roceeding pro se , filed a pre - trial writ of habeas corpus in this Court requesting that we order him to be released from wrongful imprisonment. Relator contends that he was denied due process of law becau se he was incarcerated for failing to appear at a court hearing despite having failed to receive notice

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case. ” ); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2

of the hearing. Relator further contends th at he has received ineffective assistance of counsel. We dismiss this original proceeding for want of jurisdiction. Article V, section 6, of the Texas Constitution provides that courts of appeals “shall have original or appellate jurisdiction, under suc h restrictions and regulations as may be prescribed by law.” T EX

. C ONST

. art. V, § 6. Pursuant to this constitutional directive, the Legislature established the authority of a court of appeals to issue writs in section 22.221 of the Government Code. See T EX

. G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 22.221 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.). Under section 22.221, our original jurisdiction to entertain applications for writ of habeas corpus extends solely to the actions of judges in civil cases. See id. § 22.221(d) ; Lewis v

. State , 191 S.W.3d 225, 229 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2005, pet ref'd); In re Shaw , 175 S.W.3d 901, 903 (Tex. App.

— Texarkana 2005, orig. proceeding); Watson v. State , 96 S.W.3d 497, 500 (Tex. App.

— Amarillo 2002, pet ref'd); Ex parte Hearon , 3 S.W.3d 650, 650 (Tex. App.

— Waco 1999, orig. proceeding). This Court has no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters. See id. § 22.221(d) ; Ex parte Price , 228 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2007, orig. proceeding); Chavez v. State , 132 S.W.3d 509, 51 0 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.); Watson , 96 S.W.3d at 500; Dodson v. State , 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1999, no pet ). In such cases, our jurisdiction is appellate only. See Dodson , 988 S.W.2d at 835; see also In re Hall , No. 03

- 17

- 00778

- CV, 2017 WL 5985541, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Nov. 30, 2017, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of habeas
corpus , is of the opinion that relator has not established this Co urt ’ s jurisdiction over the3

relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction

.
GINA M. BENAVIDES , Justice
Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed the 11t h day of January, 2018

.
American International Construction Inc.
             A DIVISION OF AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL CONSOLIDATED INC.
                                 14603 Chrisman
                              Houston, Texas 77039
                       (281) 449-9000 o FAX (281) 442-6351



November 3, 1997



Mr. Kenneth W. Maddox
Vice President/Chief Financial Officer
MBCI
14031 West Hardy
Houston, TX 77060


Dear Ken:

As you are aware, we have reduced the amount of our initial public offering as a
result of the offering  changing form one of a "best  efforts" basis to one on a
"firm commitment" basis.  Accordingly,  we hereby request the MBCI confirm their
agreement  to certain  changes in the "Use of the  Proceeds"  from the  offering
which are specified on the attached schedule.

Please  sign the  statement  below  acknowledging  MBCI's  understanding  of the
changes  to the  use  of the  public  offering  proceeds.  Thank  you  for  your
cooperation.

Sincerely,



/s/  John T. Wilson
-----------------------
John T. Wilson
Chief Executive Officer

JTW/ad




MBCI hereby  confirms that  $1,000,000 of the offering  proceeds will be used to
reduce American  International  Consolidated  Inc.'s accounts payable balance to
MBCI. Previously,  $1,200,000 of the offering proceeds were to be used to reduce
American International Consolidated Inc.'s not payable to MBCI.



/s/ Kenneth W. Maddox                       November 4, 1997
---------------------                       ----------------
Kenneth W. Maddox                           Date
Chief Financial Officer
MBCI





                            "Quality Brings Success"
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7531 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MARK DIPADOVA, a/k/a Mark Voiers, a/k/a Jack

Norris,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-01-127; CA-02-1045-0-10)

Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 6, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark DiPadova, Appellant Pro Se. Dean Arthur Eichelberger, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mark DiPadova seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

(2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that DiPadova has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

HECTOR MARTINEZ,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00363

- CR

Appeal from the

409 th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20100D00750 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF MAY, 2016.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-14-00073- CV

In re Janice M arie Vic kers

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM CO MAL CO UNTY
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relator has filed a reque st for a fre e rec ord rela ted to an application for writ of habea s corpus, a reque st we have filed as a petition for writ of manda mus. We deny the petition for wr it 1 of manda mus.

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and F ield Filed: F ebrua

ry 21, 2014

The caption of rela tor’s document states that i t wa s fi l ed “in the Court of Criminal 1 Appea ls,” so it is poss ible the document wa s mistakenly filed in the wrongcourt.
# ***Exhibit 32.2***

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Advanced Accessory Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald J.Gardhouse, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)    TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|     /s/  RONALD J. GARDHOUSE |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Ronald J. Gardhouse                              |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                          |   |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                    |   |
| November 12, 2004                                |   |

 

1

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5441 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend the special survivor indemnity allowance to survivors of certain members of the Armed Forces 

who die on active duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2008 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina (for himself, Mr. KLINE of Minnesota, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mrs. BOYDA of Kansas, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend the special 

survivor indemnity allowance to survivors of certain 

members of the Armed Forces who die on active duty. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5441 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION TO SURVIVORS OF CERTAIN MEM2 BERS WHO DIE ON ACTIVE DUTY OF SPECIAL 

3 SURVIVOR INDEMNITY ALLOWANCE FOR PER4 SONS AFFECTED BY REQUIRED SURVIVOR 

5 BENEFIT PLAN ANNUITY OFFSET FOR DE6 PENDENCY AND INDEMNITY COMPENSATION. 

7 (a) EXTENSION.—Subsection (m) of section 1450 of 

8 title 10, United States Code, as added by section 644 of 

9 the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 

10 2008 (Public Law 110–181; 122 Stat. 158), is amended 

11 in paragraph (1)(B) by striking ‘‘section 1448(a)(1) of 

12 this title’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)(1) of section 1448 

13 of this title or by reason of coverage under subsection (d) 

14 of such section’’. 

15 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENT.—The amendment 

16 made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to the 

17 month beginning on October 1, 2008, and subsequent 

18 months as provided by paragraph (6) of subsection (m) 

19 of section 1450 of title 10, United States Code, as added 

20 by section 644 of the National Defense Authorization Act 

21 for Fiscal Year 2008. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
JAGUAR ACQUISITION CORPORATION




                                                     ______________, 2005

Katalyst LLC
1200 River Road, Suite 1302
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428

Gentlemen:

         This letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the
effective date ("Effective Date") of the registration statement for the initial
public offering ("IPO") of the securities of Jaguar Acquisition Corporation
("JAC") and continuing until the earlier of the consummation by JAC of a
"Business Combination" or JAC's liquidation (as described in JAC's IPO
prospectus) (the "Termination Date"), Katalyst LLC shall make available to JAC
certain office space, utilities and secretarial support as may be required by
JAC from time to time, situated at 1200 River Road, Suite 1302, Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania 19428.


                                      Very truly yours,


                                      JAGUAR ACQUISITION CORPORATION


                                      By:
                                          ---------------------------------
                                          Name:  Jonathan Kalman
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

KATALYST LLC


By:
    -------------------------
    Name:
    Title:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of BIO-key International, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Francis J. Cusick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| BIO-KEY  INTERNATIONAL, INC. |                       |   |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                              |                       |   |   |
| By:                               | /s/ FRANCIS J. CUSICK |   |   |
|                              | Francis J. Cusick          |   |   |
|                              | Chief Financial Officer    |   |   |
|                              |                       |   |   |
| Date: March 29,  2007             |                       |   |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Anthony C., Appellant, v Kristine Z., Respondent.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[801 NYS2d 195]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Anthony J. Sciolino, J.), entered January 16, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8. The order dismissed the petition to modify the visitation provisions of an order entered September 30, 2003.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in *Matter of Kristine Z. v Anthony C.*(21 AD3d 1319 [2005]). Present—Scudder, J.P., Martoche, Smith, Pine and Hayes, JJ.