alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
JRG Logo

                             JAMES RIVER GROUP, INC.

              INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE


                                             SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
COMMON STOCK                                                   CUSIP 470359 10 0


This certifies that





Is the owner of



      FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01
                                  PER SHARE OF

                             JAMES RIVER GROUP, INC.

transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized
attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate
is not valid unless countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and
Registrar.
WITNESS the facsimile signatures of the duly authorized officers of the
Corporation.

Dated:


President                                                              Secretary
                                      SEAL

                                  Countersigned and Registered:
                                           EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.
                                                    Transfer Agent and Registrar
**Exhibit 13.1 **

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Virginia Gold Mines Inc.  for the year ended May 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.

 Date: November 25, 2004

*/s/André Gaumond*André Gaumond  President and Chief Executive Officer

  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other  document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature  that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to Virginia Gold Mines Inc. and will  be retained by Virginia Gold Mines Inc. and furnished to the Securities and  Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 4.5      CONSENT OF MATHIEU SAVARD   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2014 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Mathieu Savard, participated in the preparation of the technical entitled Technical Report and Recommendations, 2013 Exploration Program, Coulon Project, Quebec Mines Virginia Inc., December 2013 concerning mineralized material in the Coulon property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings Item III  Description of the Business  3.1.4 Geological Setting; 3.1.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.1.6 Mineralization in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2014 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,


| |                                     |  | 
| | ----------------------------------- |  | 
| | /S/
Mathieu Savard                  |  | 
| | Name:
Mathieu Savard, B.Sc., P.Geo. |  | 

May 15, 2014
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.8

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                      AASI ACQUISITION PROJECT NO. 1, INC.

                                    * * * * *

          AASI Acquisition Project No. 1, Inc., a corporation organized and
existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, (the "Company"), does hereby certify:

          FIRST: That the Board of Directors, by the written consent of its
members, filed with the minutes of the Board, adopted a resolution proposing and
declaring advisable the following amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation
of said corporation:

          RESOLVED, that the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company be
          amended by replacing Article I in its entirety with the following:

                                    ARTICLE I

               "The name of the corporation is Mooney Airplane Company, Inc."

          SECOND: That in lieu of a meeting and vote of the stockholders, the
stockholders have given unanimous written consent to said amendment in
accordance with provisions of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.

          THIRD: That the aforesaid amendment was duly adopted in accordance
with the applicable provisions of Sections 242 and 228 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this certificate to be
signed by Roy H. Norris, this 26th day of March, 2002.


                                      /s/ Roy H. Norris
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Roy H. Norris,
                                     President and Chief Executive Officer


                                                               STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                              SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                        DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
                                                          FILED 10 AM 04/01/2002
                                                               020206938-3498591
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7249** 

DERRICK YOUNG , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. CHAD WADDELL, Sergeant; BOBBY HARLESS, Superintendent; KENNETH JONES, Inmate Grievance Examiner; JONNITA WILLIAMS, Inmate Grievance Examiner; FNU CREWS, Officer; INA H INTON, Administrative Assistant , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Statesville
. Graham C. Mullen , Senior District Judge. ( 5:10

- cv - 00101

- GCM )

Submitted : January 13, 2011 Decided: January 19, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Derrick Young, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding preced ent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Derrick Young appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and denying his motion for reconsi deration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court
. Young v. Waddell , No. 5:10

- cv - 00101

- GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2010 & Nov. 8, 2010)
. We deny Young’s motion for appoint ment of counsel and his motion to stay the appeal in order to allow him to submit additional documentation. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument woul d not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6509

NORMAN G. BERG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RUFUS FLEMING, Regional Administrator; DAVID

ROBINSON, Warden; GRACE SEYMOUR, Sergeant,

Investigator; KERN GILLIAM, Business Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-176-AM)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 4, 1996

Before HALL, MICHAEL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman G. Berg, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Berg v. Fleming, No. CA-96-176-AM (E.D. Va. Feb.

13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
SCPW-24-0000191
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

________________________________________________________________ MIKE YELLEN, Petitioner,

vs. CIRCUIT COURT, THIRD CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I, Respondent.

________________________________________________________________ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (3CCV-22-0000084) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald , C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ .) Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus filed on March 22, 2024, and the record, the circuit court has acted on the pending matters that brought about the petition in SCPW-22-0000717 . Petitioner may continue to seek relief in the circuit court in 3CCV-22-0000084. An extraordinary writ is unwarranted. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim , 153 Hawai ʻ i 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023). Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-24-0000191 06-JUN-2024 09:11 AM Dkt. 6 ODDP2 It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, June 6, 2024. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Vladimir P. Devens
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 (Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  1.
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended April
30, 2006 (the Report), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Ayman SabiAyman SabiActing Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

NEDIL ROBELO ZUNIGA-NAVARRO, 

a.k.a. Nedil Zuniga-Navarro, a.k.a. Robelo 

Zuniga-Navarro-Nedil, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 18-10310 

D.C. No. 4:17-cr-01922-CKJ 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 15, 2019**

Before: TROTT, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. 

Nedil Robelo Zuniga-Navarro appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 30-month sentence for illegal reentry of a 

removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 22 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-10310 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Zuniga-Navarro’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there 

are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 

We have provided Zuniga-Navarro the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental 

brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Zuniga-Navarro waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our 

independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 

(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United 

States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss 

the appeal. See id. at 988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.
First Amendment to the Greer State Bank Supplemental Life Insurance Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
  
 Prepared 06-22-05 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO THE

 GREER STATE BANK 
 SUPPLEMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE AGREEMENT 
 DATED SEPTEMBER 21, 2004 
 FOR 
 E. PIERCE WILLIAMS

  
 THIS AMENDMENT is adopted this 26th day of July, 2005, by and between GREER STATE BANK, a state chartered corporation located in Greer, South Carolina (the
“Company”) and E. PIERCE WILLIAMS (the “Executive”). 
  
 The Company and the Executive executed the Supplemental Life Insurance Agreement (the “Agreement”) on September 21, 2004. Pursuant to Article 9 of the Agreement the undersigned hereby amend the Agreement to
(1) correctly identify the options of the Executive to purchase the policy and (2) to eliminate the non-compete covenant. Therefore, the parties further agree to the following: 
  
 Article 9.2 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by Article 9.2 below: 
  

	9.2	Option to Purchase Upon Termination. If the Company exercises the right to terminate the Agreement, the Company shall not sell, surrender or transfer ownership of a
Policy without first giving the Executive or the Executive’s transferee the option to purchase the Policy for a period of sixty (60) days from written notice of such intention. The purchase price shall be equal to an amount greater of (a) the
premiums paid or (b) the cash surrender value of the Policy. 

  
 Article 9.3 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety. 
  
 IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the Executive and the Company hereby consent to this First Amendment. 
  

					
	Executive:	 	GREER STATE BANK
			
	 /s/ E. Pierce Williams

	 	By	 	 /s/ R. Dennis Hennett


	E. Pierce Williams	 	Title	 	CEO
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-20794 Summary Calendar

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSÉ ATADEO PENADO-RAMOS, also known as José Atadeo Ramirez-Penado, also known as José Atadeo Penado, also known as José Attado Ramox, also known as José Attado Ramos, also known as José A. Ramos, also known as José Ramos, also known as José Ataded Penado, also known as José Aladeo Penado-Ramos, also known as José Atadeo, also known as José Avadeo Penado-Ramos,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-99-CR-201-ALL

_________________________________________________________________ June 1, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

José Atadeo Penado-Ramos appeals his co nviction for illegal

reentry pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) , (b)(2). He argues that:

(1) the indictment was i nsufficient for failing to allege an2

element of intent; (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the

jury’s verdict because the evidence indic ated that he reasonably

believed that his reentry was lawful and because he established a

defense of entrapment by estoppel; and (3) specific intent is a

material element of an offense under § 1326. He concedes that his

specific intent argument is foreclosed by this court’s holding in

United States v. Trevino-Martinez

, 86 F.3d 65, 69 (5th Cir. 1996).

This court reviews a challenge to the sufficiency of the

indictment de novo

. See United States v. Cabrera-Teran , 168 F.3d

141, 143 (5th Cir. 1999). An indictment must allege each material

element of the offense in order to be sufficient. S ee id. Because

intent is not a material element of a violation of § 1326, PenadoRamos’s challenge fails. See id. at 143-44, 144 n.7.

This court also reviews a challenge to the sufficiency of the

evidence de novo

. See United States v. Medina , 161 F.3d 867, 872

(5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied

, 119 S.Ct. 1344 (1999). PenadoRamos’s argument that he reasonably believed that his reentry was

lawful does not affect the sufficiency of the evidence supporting

his guilty verdict because such a belief is not a defense to

criminal liability under § 1326. S ee United States v. Asibor

, 109

F.3d 1023, 1036 (5th Cir. 1997); Trevino-Martinez , 86 F.3d at 68.

Furthermore, a defense of entrapment by estoppel is not available

to Penado-Ramos because there was no evidence, nor has he alleged,3

that he was induced to rely on an affirmative misrepresentation of

the law by a government official. S ee Trevino-Martinez

, 86 F.3d at

69.

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is

A F F I R M E D.
HILL v. HILL, et al.

No. 638P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 22, 2005.

W. Scott Jones, Asheville, for Garford Tony Hill et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of November 2005 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of November 2005."
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

 

(1)         this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)         the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gander Mountain Company.

 
| Dated: June 15,  2009 |                                                         |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | /s/ David C. Pratt                                           |
|                       | David C. Pratt                                               |
| * *                   | *Chairman of the Board and  Interim Chief Executive Officer* |
|                       |                                                         |
|                       |                                                         |
|                       | /s/ Robert J. Vold                                           |
|                       | Robert J. Vold                                               |
| * *                   | *Senior Vice President,*                                     |
| * *                   | *Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer*                     |

 

----
<PAGE>
                           JENKON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                     COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                     --------------------------
                                                         1997           1998
                                                     ------------    ----------
<S>                                                  <C>             <C>
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
--------------------------
Net income (loss) .................................. $ (1,701,185)   $  478,474
                                                     ------------    ----------
                                                     ------------    ----------
Basic weighted average share outstanding ...........    1,994,792     1,799,220
Diluted effect of stock options and warrants .......        -           390,377
Conversion of preferred stock ......................        -         1,202,952
                                                     ------------    ----------
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding ........    1,994,792     3,392,549
                                                     ------------    ----------
                                                     ------------    ----------
Basic earnings (loss) per share .................... $      (0.85)   $     0.27
                                                     ------------    ----------
                                                     ------------    ----------
Diluted earnings (loss) per share .................. $      (0.85)   $     0.14
                                                     ------------    ----------
                                                     ------------    ----------
</TABLE>










                                    Page 1
STATE v. CUTHRELL

No. COA05-314.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (02CRS14578, 02CRS19311, 02CRS60951, 02CRS60952, 02CRS60953, 02CRS60954, 02CRS32460, 02CRS32461, 02CRS32462, 02CRS32463, 02CRS32464, 02CRS32465, 02CRS33502, 02CRS14578).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. John NORMAN.

No. 567P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of February 2006 by Defendant for Relief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 2nd day of March 2006."