T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MANU E L GO NZ AL O R I AN O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 72360 A ge nc yN o. A 072- 534- 072 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r13, 2012 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , T R O T T , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . M anuel G on za l o R i ano, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f M exi co, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oa r d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng hi s m ot i on t o r e m and a nd di s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s or de rde ny i ng c anc e l l a t i on o f rem o v al . O u r j u ri sd i ct i o n i s g o v ern edb y 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e rev i ew fo r ab u se 

# FI LED NO V 19 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 72360 2 o f d is c r e tio n th e B I A ’s d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e m an d , R om er o-R uiz v . Mukasey , 5 3 8 F . 3 d1 0 5 7 , 1 0 6 2 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ), an drev i ew d e n o v o du e p ro cess cl ai m s, H erna ndezv. Mukasey , 524 F . 3d 1014, 1017 ( 9th C i r . 2008) . W e de nyi n partand d is m is s in p a rt th e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on byde ny i ng R i ano’ s m ot i on t o r e m and t o p ursue a dj ustm entof st atus w here the B IA consi dere d the evi dence s ub m i tt ed and act ed w i thi n i t s broad di sc re t i on i n d et erm i ni ng thatthe evi dence w as in s u f f ic ie n t to w a rr a n t ar e m a n d . Se e R o m e r o - R u iz , 53 8 F . 3d at10 62 (“ T he B IA abuses i t s di sc re t i on i f i t s dec i si on i s arbi trary , i rr at i on al , or contraryt o l aw . ”) ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n s o m itte d ) . T h e B I A a ls o d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g R ian o ’s m o tio n to re m and so thathe coul d app l y f or vo l un t ary departure w here R i ano d ec l i ned vol unt a ryde pa rtur e be f or e the i m m i gr a t i on j udge , a nd he di d notr a i s e ac l a i m of in e f f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. Se e M

a g a l la n es -D a m i a n v . I

NS , 783 F . 2d 931, 9 3 4 (9 th C i r. 1 9 8 6 ) (al i en s are g en eral l y b o u n db y th e co n du cto f th ei r att o rn eys, ab s e n t e g r e g io u s c ir c u m s tan c e s ) . R ian o h a s n o t e s tab lis h e dav io la tio n o f du e p r o c e s s o re q u a l p r o te c tio n . See La ta v . I NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( an a l i e n m us ts how e rr ora nd s ub s tan tia l p r e

ju d ic e to p r e v a il o n adu e p r o c e s s c la im ) .09- 72360 3 W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w R i ano’ s c ont e nt i on tha thi s c a s e s houl d ha ve been remand ed t o con si der new evi dence of hardshi p rel at ed t o h i s c hi l dren b e c au s e h e f

a ile dto r a is e th a t is s u e b e f o r e th e B I A . See B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 674, 678 ( 9th C i r . 2004) ( thi s c ourtl a c ks j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w c ont e nt i ons n o trai sedb efo re th e ag en cy) . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D in p a r t ; D I S M I S S E D in p a r t .