alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                           <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                         MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                                    10,081
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                             48,114
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               3,867
<INVENTORY>                                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                          60,665
<PP&E>                                                                   132,082
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            88,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                           178,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                     37,405
<BONDS>                                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                                                98,022
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                             178,598
<SALES>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                          86,271
<CGS>                                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                             64,361
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           21,910
<INCOME-TAX>                                                               9,180
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       12,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                              12,730
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                               0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               0.22
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1


 


Attachment
C


Amendments
to TEPPCO Employee Benefit Plans


 


1.


 


2.


 


3.


 


4.                                       TEPPCO Retirement Cash Balance Plan


 


(a)                                  Effective May 31, 2005 participation is “frozen,” i.e.,
no employee who is not a participant on May 31, 2005 shall be eligible to
become covered by (become a participant in) the plan after that date.


 


(b)                                 Effective December 31, 2005 (i) all benefits
accrued as of that date shall be “frozen,” i.e., no employer contribution
credits shall be credited for any period after that date, and (ii) all
participants shall be 100% vested regardless of their years of service.


 


(c)                                  The Plan is terminated effective as of January 1, 2006.


 


5.                                       TEPPCO Supplemental Benefit Plan


 


(a)                                  A Participant’s employment with EPCO, Inc. or an
affiliate of EPCO, Inc. shall be deemed to be employment with TEPPCO.


 


(b)                                 The Plan shall be terminated on or before December 31,
2005.


 


(c)                                  Upon termination of the Plan, all benefits shall be paid in
a lump sum in 2005.


 


6.


 


7.


 


8.


 


9.
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media West LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: August 7, 2009
    By:
    /s/ Steven M. BlondySteven M. BlondyExecutive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. McGEE.

No. COA05-301.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS52872, 04CRS54934, 04CRS54935, 04CRS54936).

Case without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. BRAMMER.

No. COA05-860.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed March 7, 2006.

Certification Date March 27, 2006.

Appeal from Bladen (04CRS51828)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 02-4051



# 
D ELORISE H AWKINS ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge.

(CR-01-107) Submitted: June 4, 2002 Decided: June 25, 2002 Before WIDENER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Brian J. Grossman, ECK, COLLINS & MARSTILLER, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney,Olivia N. Hawkins, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION
PER CURIAM: Delorise Hawkins appeals her convictions, following a bench trial,for maintenance of a place for distribution, use, and storage of controlled substances, 21 U.S.C.A. § 856 (West 1999 & Supp. 2001), and possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(West 1999 & Supp. 2001). Hawkins claims the evidence is insufficient to support the convictions. We disagree and accordingly affirm. On direct appeal of a criminal conviction, a factfinder’s verdict must be sustained if there is substantial evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the government, to support it. Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). The Government produced evidence that Hawkins sold cocaine base ("crack") to Kelvin Hatchet in thefront yard of her home, located at 1513 Williamsburg Road, Richmond, Virginia, on February 8, 2001. During the course of this transaction, Hawkins told Hatchet to inform other people the area was her "territory," implying that the "territory" involved the drug trade. The following day, the Richmond police executed a search warrant at Hawkins’ home and found 5.38 grams of crack on Hawkins’ dining room table and a rock of crack in the pocket of the shorts Hawkins was wearing. Based on this evidence, the district court could properly infer that Hawkins maintained a place for the distribution, use, and storage of controlled substances and possessed crack cocaine with the intent to distribute it. Accordingly, we affirm Hawkins’ convictions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. H AWKINS
STATE of North Carolina v. Bruce Caesar LOVELL-BEY.

No. 75P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

Bruce Caesar Lovell-Bey, Pro Se.

Kathleen Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Michael Parker, District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 8th day of February 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."
2006 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

2-7-2006

Progressive N Ins Co v. Gondi

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 04-4369

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2006 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Progressive N Ins Co v. Gondi" (2006). 2006 Decisions. Paper 1633.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2006/1633
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-4369

 

PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE

 Appellant

v.

MIDHAT S. GONDI

 

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 04-cv-02034)

 

ORDER

At the direction of the Court, the caption is amended to reflect that the proceedings

in the lower court were before the Honorable Jacob P. Hart. An amended opinion and

judgment will be issued. As this correction does not substantively change the opinion and

judgment, the filed date remains unchanged.

For the Court,

/s/ Marcia M. Waldron 

Clerk

Date: February 7, 2006

LML/cc: CAM, MJZ

RJD, RMG
STATE v. PHILLIPS.

No. COA05-195.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Rowan (03CRS4040, 03CRS50660, 03CRS50738, 04CRS3745, 04CRS3746)

Case without published opinion. No error.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SHAKELL ADIMU BELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 185 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
CITIFINANCIAL MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC. F/K/A Associates Home Equity Services, Inc. v. Tonza D. RUFFIN.

No. 375P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

William Walt Pettit, Charlotte, for Citifinancial Mortgage Company.

Teresa K. Smallwood, Windsor, for Tonza D. Ruffin.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th day of July 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
NO. 07-02-0498-CV IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A JANUARY

27, 2004

____________________________ IN THE MATTER OFTHE MARRIAG E OF RICHARD BALLENGER ANDREBECCA BALLE NGER

_________________________________ FROM THE 9 9TH DIST RICT COURT OF LUBBOC K COUNTY; NO. 2001-515,864; HONORABLE M ACKEY K. H ANCOCK, JU DGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPIN ION Appellant

Richard Bal lenger filed an Agreed Motion to Di smiss on Januar y 21, 2004. No decision of thi s Court hav ing been delive red to da te, we grant the m otio n. Ac cord ingly, the appeal is dis missed. No moti on for rehearingwill be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith . Tex. R. Ap p. P. 42.1. All costs herei n having been paid, no order pertaining to costs is made. James T. Campbell Justice
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 2, 2017

d0530 

# Order

Clerk June 2, 2017

155638

In re R. E. McLAUGHLIN, Minor. SC: 155638

COA: 332170

Oakland CC Family Division:

2015

- 833596

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for le ave to appeal the March 21, 2017

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the

case of In re Hill, M inors (Docket No. 155152) is pending on appeal before this Court

and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for

leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the

decision in that c ase.
Exhibit-99.906. Exhibit



10-Q Exhibit 32.1: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of iShares COMEX Gold Trust
(the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Blake Grossman, Chief Executive Officer of Barclays Global Investors, N.A.,
the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 23, 2005                                                    
|                                                                      
|/s/    BLAKE GROSSMAN                                                 
|Blake Grossman * Chief Executive Officer (Principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Grossman is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors, N.A., the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN RE J.G.

No. COA05-503.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. Affirmed as to respondent mother; dismissed as to respondent father.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellant,

v.

ASHTON NICOLE LEWIS,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3048

[November 7, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Lawrence Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

432018CF000161A.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and David John McPherrin, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
MW CLEARING & GRADING, INC., Petitioner v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY, Respondent.

No. 432A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 7, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 171 N.C.App. 170, 614 S.E.2d 568 (2005), affirming an order entered on 1 March 2004 by Judge Evelyn W. Hill in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 March 2006.

Knox, Brotherton, Knox & Godfrey, by Allen C. Brotherton, Charlotte, for petitioner-appellant.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Elizabeth J. Weese, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner appeals to this Court from the decision of the Court of Appeals on the basis of a dissent. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals as to the appealable issue of right, i.e., whether the open burning in question constituted one separate violation or multiple violations under N.C.G.S. § 143-215.114A. The remaining issues addressed by the Court of Appeals are not properly before this Court and its decision as to these issues remains undisturbed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Wake County Superior Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.
# EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Chilco River Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Tom Yu Liu, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  August 15, 2005

| | By:  
Tom Yu Liu
         Tom Yu Liu
         Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3447

_____________________________

DARRELL MATTHEW COLEMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jan Shackelford, Judge.

May 31, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
STATE v. SPRINGFIELD.

No. COA05-601.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Pender (00CRS50486, 00CRS50487, 00CRS50677)

Case without published opinion. Vacated and remanded for new probation revocation hearings.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5451 

To reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2008 

Ms. BORDALLO (for herself, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. SAXTON, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. 

FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. FARR, Mrs. 

CAPPS, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. FORTUN ̃O, Mr. BROWN of 

South Carolina, Mr. PALLONE, and Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coastal Zone Reau5 thorization Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 Section 318 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 

8 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1464) is amended by striking ‘‘SEC. 318.’’ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5451 IH

1 And all that follows through subsection (a) and inserting 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 318. (a) There are authorized to be appro4 priated to the Secretary, to remain available until ex5 pended— 

6 ‘‘(1) for grants under sections 306, 306a, and 

7 309— 

8 ‘‘(A) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2009; 

9 ‘‘(B) $82,500,000 for fiscal year 2010; and 

10 ‘‘(C) $90,750,000 for fiscal year 2011; and 

11 ‘‘(2) for grants under section 315— 

12 ‘‘(A) $18,000,000 for fiscal year 2009; 

13 ‘‘(B) $19,800,000 for fiscal year 2010; and 

14 ‘‘(C) $21,780,000 for fiscal year 2011.’’. 

15 SEC. 3. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT FUND. 

16 Section 308(b)(2)(A) of the Coastal Zone Manage17 ment Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1456a(b)(2)(A)) is amended 

18 by striking ‘‘1997, 1998, and 1999’’ and inserting ‘‘2009, 

19 2010, and 2011’’. 

20 SEC. 4. COASTAL ZONE ENHANCEMENT GRANTS. 

21 Section 309(f) of the Coastal Zone Management Act 

22 of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1456b(f)) is amended— 

23 (1) by striking ‘‘1991’’ and inserting ‘‘2009’’; 

24 and 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5451 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘$10,000,000’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$11,000,000’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2 CFO CERTIFICATIONS
UNDER SECTION 906



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing Worldwide,
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Pinkerton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Charles Pinkerton   | 
| | ----------------------- | 
| | Charles Pinkerton       | 
| | Chief Financial Officer | 
| | February 21, 2012       |