alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO QUARTERLY REPORT OF

GOLDEN NUGGET, INC.

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Golden Nugget, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify [, to such officers knowledge,] that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Form 10-Q.

Date: November 14, 2006



/s/ Tilman J. FertittaTilman J. Fertitta Chairman of the Board of
Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer for Registrant
and Landrys Restaurants, Inc. (Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Rick H. LiemRick H. Liem Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Registrant and Landrys Restaurants,
Inc. (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


[The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601
(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Sections 1350, Chapter 63 of the Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.]
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Mark R. Baker, President andChief Executive Officer, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Gander Mountain Company;

 

2.             Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The Company’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and we have:

 

a)             designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)            evaluatedthe effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)             disclosedin this report any change in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) thatoccurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting.

 

5.             The Company’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a)             allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)            anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  September 13, 2004 |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
|                           | /s/ Mark R.  Baker |   |
|                           | Mark R.  Baker |
|                           | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5492 

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to construct 

a greenhouse facility at its museum support facility in Suitland, Maryland, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2008 

Ms. MATSUI (for herself, Mr. BECERRA, and Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to construct a greenhouse facility at its museum 

support facility in Suitland, Maryland, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION OF GREENHOUSE FACILITY. 

4 The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution 

5 is authorized to construct a greenhouse facility at its mu6 seum support facility in Suitland, Maryland, to maintain 

7 the horticultural operations of, and preserve the orchid 

8 collection held in trust by, the Smithsonian Institution. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5492 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There is authorized to be appropriated $12,000,000 

3 to carry out this Act. Such sums shall remain available 

4 until expended. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


STRAIGHT NOTE


 


	
  $350,000

  	
  South El Monte, California

  	
  July 15,
  2005

  



 


For
value received, Lee Pharmaceuticals promises to pay Roberts Proprietaries, Inc.
or order, at South El Monte, California the sum of THREE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND
DOLLARS, with interest from July 15, 2005, on unpaid principal at the rate
of twenty (20) per cent annum; principal is payable monthly, commencing on August 1,
2005, with monthly principal payments of $5,000. Interest shall be calculated
on the basis of the unpaid principal balance daily, based on a 365-day year,
actual day month and payable monthly. Principal and interest shall be payable
in lawful money of the United States. If action were instituted on this note, I
promise to pay such sum as the Court may fix as attorney’s fees. This note is
secured by the trademark on the product brand Zip®.


 


This
promissory note replaces the $300,000 promissory note, dated March 17,
2004, which has been paid down to $225,000 as of July 15, 2005. All other
terms and conditions (including the Security Agreement, Amendment No. 1 to
1988 Security Agreement, Guarantee of Ronald G. Lee and Exhibits) of the December 1,
1998, original $500,000 promissory note, remain in force except as stated in
the above paragraph of this new promissory note, dated July 15, 2005.


 


 


	
  JULY 15,
  2005

  	
   

  	
  RONALD
  G. LEE

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  	
  Lee
  Pharmaceuticals – Ronald G. Lee

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  JULY 15,
  2005

  	
   

  	
  MICHAEL
  L. AGRESTI

  	
   

  
	
  Date

  	
   

  	
  Lee
  Pharmaceuticals - Michael L. Agresti
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 53 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter into 

a long-term lease with the Government of the United 

States Virgin Islands to provide land on the island of 

Saint John, Virgin Islands, for the establishment of a 

school, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 53 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Virgin Islands Na3 tional Park School Lease Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LONG-TERM LEASE, VIRGIN ISLANDS NATIONAL 

5 PARK, SAINT JOHN, VIRGIN ISLANDS. 

6 (a) LEASE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of the Inte7 rior may lease to the Government of the United States 

8 Virgin Islands a parcel of real property, including any im9 provements thereon, located within the boundaries of Vir10 gin Islands National Park on the island of Saint John, 

11 Virgin Islands, as depicted on the map entitled ‘‘Virgin 

12 Islands National Park School Exchange’’, numbered 161/ 

13 80,037, and dated September 19, 2007, for the purpose 

14 of providing a suitable location for the establishment of 

15 a school by the Government of the United States Virgin 

16 Islands on the island. 

17 (b) TERM OF LEASE.—The lease authorized by sub18 section (a) may not exceed a term of 99 years. 

19 (c) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map referred to in 

20 subsection (a) shall be on file and available for public in21 spection in the appropriate offices of the National Park 

22 Service. 

23 (d) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

24 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi25 tions in connection with the lease under this section as 
3 

•HR 53 EH

1 the Secretary considers appropriate to protect the inter2 ests of the United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 22, 

2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 53 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to enter 

poses. the establishment of a school, and for other puron the island of Saint John, Virgin Islands, for the United States Virgin Islands to provide land into a long-term lease with the Government of
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofGlobal Green Solutions Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedFebruary 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,J. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 9thday of April, 2008.                                                                                                                    
|   

J. DOUGLAS FRATERJ. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer





















---
JOHNSON v. HONEYCUTT

No. COA05-295

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Mitchell (02CVD237).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent

v.

JAMAL SHAREEF BRADLEY, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 17-0185 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2007-142931-001

The Honorable Jose S. Padilla, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Jamal Shareef Bradley, Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Michael J. Brown, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell and Chief 

Judge Samuel A. Thumma delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 11-28-2017
STATE v. BRADLEY

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM: 

¶1 Petitioner Jamal Shareef Bradley seeks review of the superior 

court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's second 

successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5400 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5400

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, as the ``Sgt. 
              Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

   Mr. LaTourette (for himself, Mr. Jordan of Ohio, Ms. Kaptur, Mr. 
  Kucinich, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Turner, Ms. Sutton, Mr. 
  Wilson of Ohio, Mr. Latta, Mr. Hobson, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, and Mr. 
   Chabot) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, as the ``Sgt. 
              Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SGT. MICHAEL M. KASHKOUSH POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sgt. Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. 
Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF INCOME FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  120,351
<ALLOWANCES>                                       161
<INVENTORY>                                     57,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,229
<PP&E>                                         288,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                 171,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 450,429
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,980
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,946
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,682
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   450,429
<SALES>                                        544,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               544,352
<CGS>                                          415,104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  415,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,408
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,738
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,305
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,433
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,433
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.91


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.12      CONSENT OF JEAN-FRANCOIS BOIVIN   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2011 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Jean-Francois Boivin, staff member of the Company, participated, in the preparation of Rapport technique et recommendations, Programme de decapage mecanique, Projet Ashuanipi, Quebec, Mars 2011 (the Technical Study) concerning mineralized material in the Ashuanipi property for the Company.   Portions of the Technical Study are summarized under the heading Item III Description of the Business  3.4.4 Geological Setting, 3.4.5 Exploration Work and Drilling, and 3.4.6 Mineralization  in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2011 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference therein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.    Very truly yours,   /s/ Jean-François Boivin _________ Name:  Jean-Francois Boivin, B.Sc., Jr. Eng.     May12, 2011
STATE v. Travis L. WALTERS.

No. 58A02-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th day of April 2005 by Defendant to Vacate Death Sentence:

"Motion Allowed and Remand to Trial Court by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2005."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5386 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5386

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 5-Methyl-2-
              (methylethyl)cyclohexyl-2-hydroxypropanoate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 5-Methyl-2-
              (methylethyl)cyclohexyl-2-hydroxypropanoate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-METHYL-2-(METHYLETHYL)CYCLOHEXYL-2-HYDROXYPROPANOATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.42 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 5-Methyl-2-
(methylethyl)cyclohexyl-2-hydroxypropanoate) is amended by striking the 
date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
JOHNSON v. HOME BLDG. CENTER.

No. COA05-827.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Harnett, (03CVD2360).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
- 606 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

296 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. ARTIS

Cite as 296 Neb. 606

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. 

Tareik Q. Artis, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed May 5, 2017. No. S-16-464.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: Lori

A. Maret, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion 

modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.

Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, Sarah E. Marfisi, 

and Nathan A. Liss for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Wright, Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, 

Kelch, and Funke, JJ.

Per Curiam.

Case No. S-16-464 is before this court on the appellee’s motion for rehearing concerning our opinion in State v. 

Artis.

1

 We overrule the motion, but we modify the original 

opinion as follows: In the section entitled “V. ANALYSIS,” 

under subheading “2. Plain Error,” subsection “(a) Artis’ 

Sentence Is Indeterminate,” we withdraw the third and fourth 

sentences of the single paragraph of that subsection, which 

now reads:

1 State v. Artis, ante p. 172, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2017).

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

07/21/2017 08:11 AM CDT
- 607 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

296 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. ARTIS

Cite as 296 Neb. 606

(a) Artis’ Sentence 

Is Indeterminate

[9-12] The State has mischaracterized Artis’ sentence 

of “not less than 2 years, nor more than 2 years” as a 

determinate sentence. A determinate sentence is imposed 

when the defendant is sentenced to a single term of years, 

such as a sentence of 2 years’ imprisonment. See State v. 

White, 256 Neb. 536, 590 N.W.2d 863 (1999). In contrast, 

when imposing an indeterminate sentence, a sentencing 

court ordinarily articulates either a minimum term and 

maximum term or a range of time for which a defendant 

is to be incarcerated. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-105 (Reissue 

2016); State v. White, supra. In Nebraska, the fact that the 

minimum term and maximum term of a sentence are the 

same does not affect the sentence’s status as an indeterminate sentence. See, State v. Marrs, 272 Neb. 573, 723 

N.W.2d 499 (2006); State v. Urbano, 256 Neb. 194, 589 

N.W.2d 144 (1999). Thus, we conclude that Artis’ sentence for his Class IV felony is an indeterminate sentence 

in which the minimum and maximum terms are the same. 

Such sentence complies with L.B. 1094’s requirement that 

the court impose an indeterminate sentence for a Class IV 

felony when that sentence is imposed consecutively with 

a Class IIA felony, and we therefore find no plain error in 

this regard.2

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

 Former opinion modified.

 Motion for rehearing overruled.

2 Id. at 179-80, ___ N.W.2d at ___.