alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Gregg A. Ostrander, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
second fiscal quarter of 2006 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2006



/s/ Gregg A. OstranderGregg A. OstranderChairman and Chief Executive Officer
CLD-242 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 13-2050

___________

IN RE: NICHOLAS QUEEN,

Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania

(Related to M.D. Pa. Civ. No. 3:98-cv-02074)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

May 16, 2013

Before: RENDELL, JORDAN and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: June 13, 2013)

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM

Nicholas Queen has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, asking that this Court 

enter an order directing the United States District Court for the Middle District of 

Pennsylvania to rule on Queen’s pending motion for relief from judgment filed on March 

11, 2013. 

Mandamus is a drastic remedy available in only the most extraordinary 

circumstances. In re Diet Drugs Prods. Liab. Litig., 418 F.3d 372, 378 (3d Cir. 2005). 

“A petitioner seeking the issuance of a writ of mandamus must have no other adequate 
2

means to obtain the desired relief, and must show that the right to issuance is clear and 

indisputable.” Madden v. Myers, 102 F.3d 74, 79 (3d Cir. 1996). A district court has 

discretion in managing the cases on its docket. In re Fine Paper Antitrust Litig., 685 F.2d 

810, 817 (3d Cir. 1982). When a matter is discretionary, it cannot typically be said that a 

litigant’s right is “clear and indisputable.” Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 

33, 35-36 (1980). Nonetheless, we have held that a writ of mandamus may be warranted 

where undue delay is tantamount to a failure to exercise jurisdiction. Madden, 102 F.3d 

at 79. 

Queen has not demonstrated undue delay in this case. Queen’s motion was filed 

on March 11, 2013, and Queen’s petition for a writ of mandamus was filed on April 16, 

2013. Queen’s motion has been ripe for adjudication for a very short period of time, one 

that clearly does not rise to the level of undue delay and does not warrant our 

intervention. See id. 

For the foregoing reasons, the petition will be denied.
# L_2013172EN.01003101.xml

| 25.6.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 172/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 172/31

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2013/308/CFSP

of 24 June 2013

amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 15 October 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/642/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against Belarus. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 15 October 2012, the Council adopted Decision 2012/642/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against Belarus.

| (2) | The Council considers that to facilitate political dialogue, the travel ban imposed on Mr. Uladzimir Uladzimiravich Makei under Article 3(1) of Decision 2012/642/CFSP should be suspended while he holds the position of Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus. The suspension should be subject to the review referred to in Article 8(2) of Decision 2012/642/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Council considers that to facilitate political dialogue, the travel ban imposed on Mr. Uladzimir Uladzimiravich Makei under Article 3(1) of Decision 2012/642/CFSP should be suspended while he holds the position of Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus. The suspension should be subject to the review referred to in Article 8(2) of Decision 2012/642/CFSP.

| (3) | Decision 2012/642/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2012/642/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 8 of Decision 2012/642/CFSP is replaced by the following:

"Article 8

1.   The measures referred to in Article 3(1), in so far as they apply to Mr. Uladzimir Uladzimiravich Makei, shall be suspended while he holds the position of Minister for Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Belarus.

2.   This Decision shall apply until 31 October 2013. It shall be kept under constant review. It may be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met."

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 24 June 2013.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 285, 17.10.2012, p. 1.

1

---
Order entered February 19, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01376 - CR No. 05 - 14 - 01377 - CR MATTHEW RYAN ARBANAS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 219 - 82622 - 2012 , 219 - 82623 - 2012



### O RDER We GRANT O fficial Court Reporter Indu A. Bailey’s February 13, 2015 request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The reporter’s record shall be due on March 9, 2015

. /s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GENESIS HUDSON,

Appellant,

v.

AURAIN KEVIN EDWARDS,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-764

[November 9, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Tabitha Blackmon, Judge; L.T. Case No. 21-17498 

COWE.

Genesis Hudson, Lauderhill, pro se.

No brief filed on behalf of appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, CIKLIN and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
STATE v. BOONE.

No. COA06-306.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 15, 2006.

Certification Date September 5, 2006.

Appeal from Northampton (04CRS50672, 04CRS50675).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# L_2013055EN.01002701.xml

| 27.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 55/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 55/27

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 343 of 14 December 2012
  )

On page 27, in Annex II, ‘Correlation table’:

for:

| ‘Article 19(1), point (e) | Article 19(1), point (f) |
| --- | --- |
| Article 51(6) | Article 54(1)’ |

‘Article 19(1), point (e)

Article 19(1), point (f)

Article 51(6)

Article 54(1)’

read:

| ‘Article 19(1), point (e) | Article 51(6) |
| --- | --- |
| Article 19(1), point (f) | Article 54(1)’ |

‘Article 19(1), point (e)

Article 51(6)

Article 19(1), point (f)

Article 54(1)’

---
Amend No.1 to Executive Defferred Compensation Pln



 






EXHIBIT 10.52




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO

SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




     WHEREAS, SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the SEABULK
INTERNATIONAL, INC. EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan’s restricted stock unit adjustment provisions;
and



     WHEREAS, the Company also desires to amend the Plan’s termination provisions; and



     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has authorized
this amendment on April 18, 2005.



     NOW THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of April 18, 2005:




	I.	 	Section 4.8 of the Plan shall be deleted and replaced with the following:






	 	“4.8	 	In the event of stock dividends, spin offs of assets or other
extraordinary dividends, stock splits, combinations of shares,
recapitalizations, mergers, consolidations, reorganizations, liquidations,
issuances of rights or warrants and similar transactions or events, the number
or type of shares or other property in which RSUs are deemed to be invested
shall be adjusted appropriately by the Deferred Compensation Committee, as
determined in its sole discretion. The Deferred Compensation Committee may, in
its sole discretion, make such other adjustments to the operation of this
Article 4 as it determines to be appropriate to reflect an adjustment made
pursuant to the preceding sentence.”






	II.	 	The following shall be added to the end of Section 4.9 of the Plan:






“Notwithstanding the foregoing or any provision of a Restricted Stock
Deferral Agreement to the contrary, in the event of an adjustment pursuant
to Section 4.8, distributions from a Participant’s RSU Account shall be made
in such forms or forms as the Deferred Compensation Committee determines in
its sole discretion to be necessary to appropriately reflect such
adjustment.”




	III.	 	The following shall be added to the end of Section 13.2 of the Plan:






“Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event of the consummation of a merger
of the Company with Seacor Holdings Inc. or a subsidiary thereof on or
before December 31, 2005, the Plan shall not be terminated pursuant to this
Section 13.2 before the expiration of a period of ten (10) years following
the effective date of such merger.”



 









 






	IV.	 	As amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.





	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Seabulk International, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Alan R. Twaits
 	 
	 	 	     Alan R. Twaits 	 
	 	 	     Senior Vice President, General Counsel

     and Secretary
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The undersigned  executive  officers of the Registrant  hereby certify that
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.





                     By:/s/ John R. Male
                        --------------------------------------------------------
                        Name:  John R. Male
                        Title: Chairman of the Board and
                                Chief Executive Officer



                     By:/s/ C. Keith Swaney
                        -------------------------------------------------------
                        Name:  C. Keith Swaney
                               Title: President, Chief Operating Officer
                                and Treasurer


Date: November 13, 2003
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 135 (Friday, July 15, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42505]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (22-054)]


NASA Advisory Council; Technology, Innovation and Engineering 
Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 
announces a meeting of the Technology, Innovation, and Engineering 
Committee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This Committee reports to 
the NAC.

DATES: Wednesday, August 3, 2022, 8:30 a.m.-4:15 p.m., Eastern Time.

ADDRESSES: Meeting will be a hybrid of in-person and virtual. See dial-
in and Webex information below under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Mike Green, Designated Federal 
Officer, Space Technology Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, 
Washington, DC 20546, via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fe99d093d0998c9b9b90be909f8d9fd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d0b7febdfeb7a2b5b5be90beb1a3b1feb7bfa6">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 358-
4710.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will only be available by Webex 
or telephonically for members of the public. If dialing in via toll 
number, you must use a touch-tone phone to participate in this meeting. 
Any interested person may join via Webex at https://nasaenterprise.webex.com, the meeting number is 2760 821 3834, and the 
password is n@cTIE080322. The toll number to listen by phone is +1-415-
527-5035. To avoid using the toll number, after joining the Webex 
meeting, select the audio connection option that says, ``Call Me'' and 
enter your phone number. If using the desktop or web app, check the 
``Connect to audio without pressing 1 on my phone'' box to connect 
directly to the meeting.
    Note: If dialing in, please mute your telephone.
    The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

--Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD) Update
--NASA Nuclear Systems Update
--Early Career Initiative Overview and Researcher Presentation
--2016 Space Technology Research Institutes Updates
--Office of Technology, Policy, and Strategy Update
--Update on Moon to Mars Blueprint

    It is imperative that this meeting be held on this day to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Carol J. Hamilton,
Acting Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-15177 Filed 7-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
RENWICK KEEL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3018

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 1, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

William F. Stone, Judge.

Renwick Keel, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
STATE v. Eric Glenn LANE.

No. 606A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 12, 2006.

C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of June 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time for Court Reporter to Deliver transcripts:

"Motion Allowed. Court reporter shall have up to and including the 8th day of August 2006 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel. By order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of June 2006."
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew
      A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








*/s/
                Matthew A. Jones*Matthew
                A. JonesChief
                Financial OfficerAugust
                14, 2007
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT C ARLSEN C LEM ENTE; M ILANNE LIM C LEM ENTE, Pe titione rs, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 10-73894 Age n c y Nos. A098-410-380 A098-410-381 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d April 22, 2015 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, B YB EE, a nd C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. C arlse n C le m e nte an d M ila nne Lim C le m e nte , native s a

n d c itiz e ns of the Philippine s, pe tition for re vie w of the B o ard of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing the ir a

ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing the ir a pplic ation for a s y lum an d withholding of rem ova l. W e have jurisdic t ion unde r 8



# FIL ED APR 29 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings. Oc hav e v . IN

S , 254 F.3d 859, 861-62 (9th C ir. 2001) . W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the B IA’ s de te rm ination tha

t pe titione rs fa ile d to e s ta b lish c h ange d or e xtra ordina ry c irc um s ta

nc e s to e xc u s e the i r untim e ly a sy lum a pplic ations. Se e 8 C .F.R . § 1208.4(a)(4), (5); se e also Ramadan v. Gonzale s , 479 F.3d 646, 657-58 (9th C ir. 2007) (pe r c uriam ). Thus, pe titione rs’ a sy lum c la im

is tim e -barre d. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e a lso supports the B IA’ s de te rm ination tha

t pe titione rs fa ile d to e sta

blish pa st pe rse c ution or fe ar of future pe rse c ution on a c c ount of a prote c te d ground. Se e Ze tino v . Holde r , 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th C ir. 2010) (pe t itione r’ s “ de s ire to be fre e from ha ra ssm e nt by

c rim ina ls m otiva

te d by the ft or random viole nc e ” la c ks ne xus); Singh v . IN S , 134 F.3d 962, 967 (9th C ir. 1998) (pe t itione r m

ust show pa

rtic ula riz e d risk). Thus, pe titione rs’ withholding of re m ova l c la im

fa ils. In light of this de

te rm ination, we ne e d not re a c h pe titione rs’ argum e nts re ga

rding pa rtic ula r soc ia l group or politic a l opinion. PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 0 - 7 3 8 9 4 2
STATE of North Carolina v. Narada WATSON.

No. 120P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

James N. Freeman, Jr., for Narada Watson.

Gerald K. Robbins, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th day of March 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Internet Infinity,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005
(the "Report"),  I, Roger Casas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  June 28, 2005

                                                      /s/ Roger Casas
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Roger Casas
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.