alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2021065DE.01006101.xml

| 25.2.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 65/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 65/61

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2016/2031 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 26. Oktober 2016 über Maßnahmen zum Schutz vor Pflanzenschädlingen, zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EU) Nr. 228/2013, (EU) Nr. 652/2014 und (EU) Nr. 1143/2014 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinien 69/464/EWG, 74/647/EWG, 93/85/EWG, 98/57/EG, 2000/29/EG, 2006/91/EG und 2007/33/EG des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 317 vom 23. November 2016
  )

Seite 22, Artikel 18 Absatz 6 Unterabsatz 1

Anstatt:

„(6)   Die Mitgliedstaaten melden der Kommission und den anderen Mitgliedstaaten bis zum 30. April jedes Jahres, wie viele abgegrenzte Gebiete an welchen Orten im vorherigen Kalenderjahr eingerichtet wurden, welche Schädlinge betroffen waren und welche Maßnahmen jeweils ergriffen wurden.“

muss es heißen:

„(6)   Die Mitgliedstaaten melden der Kommission und den anderen Mitgliedstaaten bis zum 30. April jedes Jahres, wie viele abgegrenzte Gebiete an welchen Orten eingerichtet waren, welche Schädlinge betroffen waren und welche Maßnahmen im vorherigen Kalenderjahr jeweils ergriffen wurden.“

---
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

     CERTIFICATIONS

          The undersigned officer of Empire Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose
whatsoever.


Date:  March 30, 2004                  By: /s/ Nathan Kahn
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Nathan Kahn,
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President

          The undersigned officer of Empire Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose
whatsoever.


Date:   March 30, 2004                 By: /s/ Sandra Kahn
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Sandra Kahn,
                                           Chief Financial Officer
NO. 07-03-0341-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A SEPTEMBER 12, 2003

______________________________ RICHARD PREW ITT, APPELLA NT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 3 56TH DI STRICT COURT OF HA RDIN COUNT Y; NO. 14648; HON ORABLE BRITT PLUN K, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ. MEMORANDUM OPIN ION Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal. Pursua nt to Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the request to withdraw the notice of appeal is si gned by appellant. No decision of this Court hav ing been deli vered to date ,2

we grant the motion. No motion f or rehearing will be entertained and our manda te will issue forthw ith. Accordingl y, the appeal is dismiss ed. Don H. Reavis Justice Do not publish
.
Order entered February 12, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00028-CV

CYNTHIA PAROSKI D/B/A DFW VIP POOLS, Appellant

V.

STAVICK2 INC. D/B/A TROPIX, Appellee

On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 296-00206-2011

ORDER

We DENY as premature appellant’s February 6, 2013 motion for an extension of time to 

file a brief. Appellant’s brief will be due within thirty days after the later of: (1) the date the 

clerk’s record is filed; or (2) the date the reporter’s record is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P.38.6(a).

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U. S. C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Bret S. Price, certify, as of the dates hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that the quarterly report of MVB Financial Corp. on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of MVB Financial Corp. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

 

Date: May 16, 2014

 

 
| /s/ Bret S. Price                                        |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Bret S. Price                                            |   |
| Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MVB Financial Corp. and will be retained by MVB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM GRANT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 74 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.42

                             Amendment No. 2 to the
               Tenneco Automotive Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan

This Amendment No. 2 (the "Amendment") to the Tenneco Automotive Inc. Deferred
Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is hereby adopted by Tenneco Automotive Inc. (the
"Company") effective as of December 31, 2004. Capitalized terms used and not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the
Plan.

1.   PLAN FREEZE. Effective December 31, 2004, all deferrals under the Plan are
     hereby frozen. As of this date, no new individuals will be eligible to
     participate in the Plan, and no new deferrals will be made under the Plan.

2.   AMENDMENT OF SECTION 7. Section 7 of the Plan is hereby deleted and
     replaced with the following:

     "A Participant's Deferred Amount shall be paid in a single lump sum payment
     to the Participant, or the Participant's beneficiary, as soon as
     practicable after:

     (a)  the Participant's death,

     (b)  the termination of the Participant's employment or service as a
          director, or

     (c)  the date specified in the applicable Deferral Election made by the
          Participant."

3.   NO OTHER CHANGES. Except to the extent expressly amended by the terms of
     this Amendment, all provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and
     effect following the date hereof and shall not be modified by this
     Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused the Plan to be amended as set forth
herein by its respective officers thereunder duly authorized.

                                                TENNECO AUTOMOTIVE INC.


                                                /s/ RICHARD P. SCHNEIDER

                                                By: Richard P. Schneider

                                                Its: Senior Vice President,
                                                     Global Administration
'use strict';
(function() {
	// CSR Setup
	var overrideCtx = {};
	overrideCtx.ListTemplateType = 100;
	overrideCtx.Templates = {};
	overrideCtx.Templates.Header = RenderHeader;
	overrideCtx.Templates.Item = RenderItem;
	overrideCtx.Templates.Footer = '';
	overrideCtx.Templates.OnPreRender = OnPreRender;
	overrideCtx.Templates.OnPostRender = OnPostRender;
	SPClientTemplates.TemplateManager.RegisterTemplateOverrides(overrideCtx);

	function GetUrl() {
		var url = _spPageContextInfo.siteAbsoluteUrl;
		return url;
	}

	function RenderHeader(ctx) {
		var header = RenderHeaderTemplate(ctx);
		var div = document.createElement('div');
		div.innerHTML = header;
		return '<div class="osc-certifiedAgencies">' + header;
	}

	// Create each item
	function RenderItem(ctx) {
		var id = ctx.CurrentItem.ID;
		var agency = ctx.CurrentItem['Agency'];
		var agencyDesc = ctx.CurrentItem['Agency.desc'];
		var poc = ctx.CurrentItem['POC'];
		var phone = ctx.CurrentItem['PhoneNumber0'];
		var certDateMonth = ctx.CurrentItem['CertifiedMonth'];
		var certDateYear = ctx.CurrentItem['CertifiedYear'];
		var expDateMonth = ctx.CurrentItem['ExpiredMonth'];
		var expDateYear = ctx.CurrentItem['ExpiredYear'];
		var baseHtml =
			'<a class="card" href="{0}"> \
				<span class="usa-tag"> \
					<i class="fas fa-file-certificate"></i> <span>2302(c) Certified</span> \
				</span> \
				<div class="content"> \
					<h6>{1}</h6> \
					<div class="poc"> \
						<span class="title">Point of Contact:</span> \
						<div> \
							<span>{2}</span> \
							<span>{3}</span> \
						</div> \
					</div> \
					<div class="dates"> \
						<div class="date"> \
							<span class="title">Certification/Recertification Date:</span><span class="date-actual">{4} {5}</span> \
						</div> \
						<div class="date"> \
							<span class="title">Certification Expiration:</span><span class="date-actual">{6} {7}</span> \
						</div> \
					</div> \
				</div> \
			</a>';

			console.log(ctx.CurrentItem);
		return String.format(baseHtml, agency, agencyDesc, poc, phone, certDateMonth, certDateYear, expDateMonth, expDateYear);
	}

	function OnPostRender(ctx) {
		$.each($('.date-actual'), function(i){
			var content = $(this).html();
			content = content.split('-')[1];
			$(this).html(content);
		});
	}

	function OnPreRender(ctx) {
		var t = setInterval(function() {
			if(window.jQuery) {
				clearInterval(t);
				
				var InEditMode =(document.getElementById('MSOLayout_InDesignMode').value == 1) ? true : false;
				if(!InEditMode){
					$('.osc-certifiedAgencies').parents('.ms-webpart-zone').addClass('osc-certifiedAgenciesZone');
					$('.osc-certifiedAgenciesZone table[id*="Hero-"], .osc-certifiedAgenciesZone table.ms-listviewtable, .osc-certifiedAgenciesZone iframe, .osc-certifiedAgencies>div:empty').remove();
				}
			
			}
		},1);
		ctx.ListSchema.NoListItem = 'Add items to this list!';
	}

})();
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Antonio F. Uccello, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  September 9, 2005


/s/ Antonio F. Uccello, III
Antonio F. Uccello, III
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Antonio F. Uccello, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated:  September 9, 2005


/s/ Antonio F. Uccello, III
Antonio F. Uccello, III
Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6797

JOSEPH LEE JOYNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. MICHAEL STOUFFER, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-00- 1119-AMD) Submitted: September 25, 2001 Decided: January 14, 2002 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Lee Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Celia Anderson Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Lee Joyner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Joyner v. Stouffer , No. CA-00-1119- AMD (D. Md. Apr. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

To the Supervisory Board and Shareholders of
Fresenius Medical Care Aktiengesellschaft
Hof an der Saale, Germany

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 of Fresenius Medical Care Aktiengesellschaft of our report dated
February 21, 2003 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Fresenius
Medical Care Aktiengesellschaft and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and
2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and
shareholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 20-F of
Fresenius Medical Care Aktiengesellschaft.

     Our report dated February 21, 2003 refers to Fresenius Medical Care AG's
adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets".

/s/ KPMG DEUTSCHE TREUHAND-GESELLSCHAFT AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
March 18, 2003
Prohibited 

Personnel Practices

By law, Federal employees may not:

• Discriminate

• Solicit or consider employment 

recommendations based on factors 

other than personal knowledge or 

records of job related abilities or 

characteristics

• Coerce the political activity of any 

person

• Deceive or willfully obstruct any 

person from competing for 

employment

• Influence any person to withdraw 

from job competition

• Give an unauthorized preference or 

advantage to improve or injure the 

prospects of any particular person for 

employment

• Engage in nepotism

• Take or threaten to take a personnel 

action because of whistleblowing

• Take or threaten to take a personnel 

action because of the exercise of a 

lawful appeal, complaint, or grievance 

right

• Discriminate based on personal conduct 

which does not adversely affect the 

performance of the employee or other

employees

• Knowingly take or fail to take 

personnel action in the violation of 

veteran's preference laws

• Violate any law, rule or regulation 

implementing or directly concerning 

merit system principles

• Implement or enforce a nondisclosure 

agreement or policy lacking notification of 

whistleblower rights

• Access the medical record of an employee or 

applicant, as part of, or in furtherance of any 

of the above-listed prohibitions

More information may be obtained from:

U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL 

1730 M STREET, N.W., SUITE 218

WASHINGTON, DC 20036-4505 

www.osc.gov | info@osc.gov

PHONE: (202) 804-7000* | TOLL FREE: 1-800-872-9855*

*Hearing and Speech Disabled: Federal Relay Service 1-800-877-8339
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5285 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5285

         To extend the suspension of duty on Ecoflex F BX7011.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

 Mr. Ferguson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the suspension of duty on Ecoflex F BX7011.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ECOFLEX F BX7011.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.22 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic 
acid, dimethyl ester, polymer with 1,4-butanediol and hexanedioic acid) 
is amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7013

JAMES R. BYERS, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-98-4-R) Submitted: September 15, 1998 Decided: October 7, 1998 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.James R. Byers, Appellant Pro Se. Hazel Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James R. Byers appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Byers v. Angelone , No. CA-98-4-R (W.D. Va. June 10, 1998).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael W. DePasquale, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of BIO-keyInternational, Inc. (the “company”);

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

4.             Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the company’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

5.             Thecompany’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’sauditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: March 29, 2007       |   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                       |   |   |   |   |
| /s/ MICHAEL W.  DEPASQUALE |   |   |   |   |
| Michael W.  DePasquale     |   |   |   |   |
| Chief Executive  Officer   |   |   |   |   |

 

----