alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5450 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove cell phones from 

listed property under section 280F. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2008 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. POMEROY, Mr. HERGER, Mr. 

CAMP of Michigan, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. TIBERI, and Mr. CANTOR) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to remove 

cell phones from listed property under section 280F. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Modernize Our Book5 keeping In the Law for Employee’s Cell Phone Act of 

6 2008’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5450 IH

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF CELLULAR TELEPHONES (OR SIMILAR 

2 TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT) FROM 

3 LISTED PROPERTY. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

5 280F(d)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code (defining listed 

6 property) is amended by inserting ‘‘and’’ at the end of 

7 clause (iv), by striking clause (v), and by redesignating 

8 clause (vi) as clause (v). 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

11 December 31, 2007. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Duane Andre HARVIN.

No. 157P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Joseph E. Zeszotarski, Jr., Raleigh, for Duane Andre Harvin.

John F. Maddrey, Special Deputy Attorney General, John Carriker, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 21st day of March 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of March 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
**CONSENT OF ENGINEER**

> 
    Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February    28, 2006 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”),    filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 I hereby consent to the references to my name under the heading “Item    II – General Development of the Business – 2.1.1 For the fiscal    year March 2005 – February 2006” in the Annual Information Form    of Virginia Gold Mines Inc. for the year ended February 28, 2006 (included    as Exhibit 2 of the Annual Report) and under the heading “Twelve-month    period ended February 28, 2006 compared to the nine-month period ended February    28, 2005 – Exploration Activities – Activities Summary”    in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Virginia Gold Mines Inc    for the year ended February 28, 2006 (included as Exhibit 3 of the Annual    Report), both respect to the Poste Lemoyne property, and to all other references    to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.

> 
Very truly yours

*/s/ Christian D’Amours*    Name: Christian D’Amours    Title: Geologist

    May 29, 2006
STATE v. Maurice McKINNON.

No. 680P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of December 2005 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Sharun Bernard SIMS.

No. 16P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

Winifred H. Dillon, Raleigh, for Sharun Sims.

Barry Bloch, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of January 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."
STATE v. Kenneth William ROBERSON.

No. 707P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 21, 2005.

Winifred H. Dillon, Raleigh, for Roberson.

Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of December 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of December 2005."
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTINA PAYLAN, M.D., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-186

)

BRIAN BISHOP, in his individual capacity, )

and MARK DETRIO, in his individual )

capacity, )

)

Appellees. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed August 24, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Gregory P. Holder, 

Judge.

Christina Paylan, M.D., pro se.

Andrew I. Dayes of Dayes Law Firm, PLLC, 

Clearwater, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, SLEET, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT
CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JOHN J. HANNAN, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|      |  |                      
|----- |  | ---------------------
|      |  | /S/    JOHN J.
HANNAN
|Name: |  | John J. Hannan       
|Date: |  | November 5, 2008
Alan Steve LAMBETH and, Wife, Betty S. Lambeth v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Michael Auten.

No. 126P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Vaiden Kendrick, Wilmington, for Alan Steve Lambeth and Betty S.

Clay Allen Collier, Wilmington, for Michael Auten.

Tom Cox, Wilmington, for N.C. Farm Bureau.

*AMENDED ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th day of March 2006 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
II 

Calendar No. 916 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5483 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 24, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JULY 30, 2008 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, as the ‘‘Private First Class David H. Sharrett 

II Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS DAVID H. SHARRETT II 

4 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 10449 White Granite Drive in 

7 Oakton, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5483 RS

1 ‘‘Private First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Private First Class 

7 David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 916 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5483 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostDavid H. Sharrett II Post Office Building’’. in Oakton, Virginia, as the ‘‘Private First Class al Service located at 10449 White Granite Drive 

JULY 30, 2008 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
STATE v. MEDLEY.

No. COA05-750.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (03CRS780957, 03CRS780958).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
In the Matters of C.L.C, et al.

No. 467A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 29, 2006.

John C. Adams, for Buncombe County DSS.

Judy Rudolph, for Guardian Ad Litem.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of March 2006 by Respondent for Motion to Consolidate for Oral Argument:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of March 2006."

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON recused.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JAMES C. ZELTER, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



| |  |                        |  | 
| |  | ---------------------- |  | 
| |  |                       
| |  | /s/ JAMES C. ZELTER    |  | 
| |  | Name: James C. Zelter  |  | 
| |  | Date: November 8, 2012 |  | 



62
JUSTICE FOR ANIMALS, INC. v. LENOIR COUNTY SPCA, INC.

No. 135A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 7, 2005.

Appeal by plaintiff pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2), and cross-appeal by defendant, from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 168 N.C.App. 298, 607 S.E.2d 317 (2005), vacating in part and reversing and remanding in part an order entered on 18 August 2003 by Judge Elizabeth A. Heath in District Court, Lenoir County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 September 2005.

Ward and Smith, P.A., by A. Charles Ellis, Greenville and Cheryl A. Marteney, New Bern, for plaintiff-appellant/appellee.

White & Allen, P.A., by David J. Fillippeli, Jr. and Gregory E. Floyd, Kinston, for defendant-appellee/appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. However, inasmuch as the issue of the "poke" procedure was not the basis of plaintiff's claim nor properly before the Court of Appeals, we specifically disavow the *495language in *Section V. Civil Remedy for Protection of Animals* in that court's opinion:

Testimony presented at trial tended to show that defendant employs a "poke" procedure to determine whether to impound or immediately euthanize an animal. On remand, the trial court should make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding whether plaintiff has presented sufficient evidence to show defendant's use of the "poke" test to determine whether a cat is feral or tame and defendant's subsequent immediate [euthanasia] constitutes "unjustifiable pain, suffering, or death." N.C. Gen.Stat. § 19A-1(2).

*Justice for Animals, Inc. v. Lenoir Cty. SPCA, Inc.,*168 N.C.App. 298, 306-07, 607 S.E.2d 317, 322-23 (2005). Thus, on remand, the trial court is not to consider the "poke" procedure.

MODIFIED AND AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report on Form
10-K/A No. 2 of Marine Exploration, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2009:

(1)  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of Marine
     Exploration, Inc.



/s/ Mark Goldberg
--------------------------
Mark Goldberg
Chief Executive Officer
April 28, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Marine Exploration, Inc. and
will be retained by Marine Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.



<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41250]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14771]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-USCG-2022-0586]


Safety Zone; Fireworks Display; John H. Kerr Reservoir, 
Clarksville, VA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone for the Virginia 
Lake Festival on July 16, 2022, Clarksville, VA, to provide for the 
safety of life on navigable waterways during this event. Coast Guard 
regulations for marine events within the Fifth Coast Guard District 
identifies the regulated area for this event. During the enforcement 
period, entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless 
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Virginia.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.506 will be enforced for the 
location identified as Item 12 in table 3 to paragraph (h)(3) from 9:30 
p.m. until 10 p.m. on July 16, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
notification of enforcement, call or email LCDR Ashley Holm, Chief, 
Waterways Management Division, Sector Virginia, U.S. Coast Guard; 
telephone 757-668-5580 email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98d9ebf0f4fde1b6ddb6d0f7f4f5d8edebfbffb6f5f1f4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a2b1902060f13442f44220506072a1f19090d44070306">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone 
in 33 CFR 165.506 for the Virginia Lake Festival regulated area from 
9:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 16, 2022. This action is being taken to 
provide for the safety of life on navigable waterways during this 
event. Coast Guard regulations for safety zones within the Fifth Coast 
Guard District, Sec.  165.506, specifies the location of the regulated 
area for the Virginia Lake Festival which encompasses portions of the 
John H. Kerr Reservoir. During the enforcement periods, entry of 
vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically 
authorized by the Captain of the Port Virginia.
    In addition to this notification of enforcement in the Federal 
Register, the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this 
enforcement period via the Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast 
Notice to Mariners.

    Dated: July 6, 2022.
Jennifer A. Stockwell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Virginia.
[FR Doc. 2022-14771 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company.                                                                                                                                               |
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 17, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice
130998 & (26) Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. HENRY BLACK, RON PALMER, DELIA Stephen J. Markman, DeLaFUENTE-DURHAM, DON PETROW, Justices JEFF SHEEHAN, NATALIE PACHOLUK, GUADALUPE ARBOLEYA, MARIANNE KORNYLO, and CAROL LINKE , Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 130998 COA: 268350 Oakland CC: 2004-058461-CL DAIMLERCHRYSLER SERVICES NORTH AMERICA, L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to a ppeal the April 18, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1) , in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals fo r clarification of its order. Specifically, the Court of Appeals shall st ate whether it intended to vacate the Oakland Circuit Court’s order denying defendant’s motion to strike and to order th e trial court to engage in an MRE 702 inquiry regarding plaintiffs’ propo sed expert testimony before issuing a new ruling on defendant’s motion to strike. On the Court’s own motion, we further ORDER that the proceedings in the Oakland Circuit Cour t are stayed pending the completion of this appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place cond itions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

t0517 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 17, 2006

Clerk
### i i i i i i



# MEMORANDUM OPI NIO N No. 04-10-00609- CR IN RE Guada lupe E. DIAZ Orig inal Mandamus Proce eding 1 

## PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice

Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: September 15, 2010 PETI TI ON F OR WR I T OF MANDAMUS DEN I ED On Aug ust 23, 2010, rela tor filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considere d rela tor’s petition f

or writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that rela tor is not entitled to the relief soug ht. Acc ording ly , the petition for writ of mandamus is D ENI ED. See T E X 

## . R. A P P 

## . P. 52.8(a)

. PER C URI AM DO NOT PUBL I SH

1 ... T h i s p r o c e e d i n g a r i s e s o u t o f C a u s e N o . 2 0 0 8

- C R

- 5 0 4 3 A , i n t h e 1 7 5 t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t C o u r t , B e x a r C o u n t y , T e x a s , t h e H o n o r a b l e M a r y R o m á n p r e s i d i n g .
HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION OF FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA, INC., James Edward Graves, Jim Graves & Associates, Inc., John McNatt Gillis, Gillis Development Corporation, Inc., et al. v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE.

No. 366P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Garris Neil Yarborough, for Home Builders.

Karen McDonald, City Attorney, Anthony Fox, Charlotte, Benjamin R. Sullivan, Brenton W. McConkey, for City of Fayetteville.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of July 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."

Justice BRADY recused.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


     In  connection  with  the  accompanying Annual Report of Internet Infinity,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on  Form  10-KSB  for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, George Paul Morris, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify  that  to  my  knowledge:

     (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)); and

     (2)     The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  June  25,  2003
                              /s/  George  Paul  Morris
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              George  Paul  Morris
                              Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer


     The  above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350) and is not being filed as part of
the  Form  10-K  or  as  a  separate  disclosure  document.





                                                                      Exhibit 99
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
Order entered February 18, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-01107-CR

EX PARTE EDRICK PAUL FULLER

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX21-93010-J

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s February 16, 2022 motion to extend the time 

to file appellant’s amended brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant 

to file his amended brief on or before February 25, 2022.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE