alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5571 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5571

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend for 5 years the program relating to waiver of the foreign 
  country residence requirement with respect to international medical 
                   graduates, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER PROGRAM.

    Section 220(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Technical 
Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note) is amended by striking 
``June 1, 2008'' and inserting ``June 1, 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDING THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE CONRAD STATE 30 PROGRAM.

    Section 214(l)(1)(D)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1184(l)(1)(D)(ii)) is amended by striking ``5'' and inserting 
``10''.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of the Congress that--
            (1) Federal programs waiving the 2-year foreign residence 
        requirement under section 212(e) of the Immigration and 
        Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(e)) for physicians are generally 
        designed to promote the delivery of critically needed medical 
        services to people in the United States lacking adequate access 
        to physician care; and
            (2) when determining the qualification of a location for 
        designation as a health professional shortage area, the 
        Secretary of Health and Human Services should consider the 
        needs of vulnerable populations in low-income and impoverished 
        communities, communities with high infant mortality rates, and 
        communities exhibiting other signs of a lack of necessary 
        physician services.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 21, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5571

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend for 5 years the program relating to waiver of the foreign 
  country residence requirement with respect to international medical 
                   graduates, and for other purposes.
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Lane McHONE.

No. 639P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Katherine Jane Allen, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Michael Lane McHone.

Steven F. Bryant, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 18th day of November 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of December 2005 by Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
STATE v. CRAWFORD.

No. COA05-1324.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (01CRS105092).

Case without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Robert J. King, Jr.Name: Robert J. King, Jr.Title: Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ James H. NicholsonName: James H. NicholsonTitle: Chief Financial Officer


Date:
February 14, 2011
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZHONGPIN INC. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Xianfu Zhu, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


Date:   November 14, 2006                 By:/s/ Xianfu Zhu
                                             ----------------------------------
                                              Xianfu Zhu
                                              Chief Executive Officer


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

        This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5697 

To prohibit the use of certain funds related to the 2008 Olympic Games 

in China, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2008 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. HIRONO, 

Mr. STARK, Ms. WATSON, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. MCCOTTER, Ms. BERKLEY, Ms. LEE, Mr. WELCH of Vermont, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, and Ms. ZOE

LOFGREN of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of certain funds related to the 2008 

Olympic Games in China, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defend the Olympic 

5 Spirit Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) The People’s Republic of China has rejected 

9 calls by the international community to cease human 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5697 IH

1 rights violations and has instead brutally cracked 

2 down on recent demonstrations in the Tibetan Au3 tonomous Region and several Chinese provinces, re4 sulting in an undetermined number of deaths and 

5 hundreds of detentions. 

6 (2) China has consistently impeded efforts to 

7 pressure Sudan to peacefully resolve the Darfur 

8 atrocities, including using its Security Council posi9 tion to block sanctions against Sudan. China has 

10 emboldened Sudan to ignore international pressure 

11 by removing the threat of further sanctions. 

12 (3) China continues to unfairly detain thou13 sands of political prisoners absent a trial, including 

14 democracy activists, human rights defenders, reli15 gious leaders, journalists, trade unionists, and polit16 ical dissidents. 

17 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF CERTAIN FUNDS RELATED 

18 TO THE 2008 OLYMPIC GAMES IN CHINA. 

19 (a) OPENING CEREMONIES.—No funds appropriated 

20 pursuant to any appropriations Acts or otherwise appro21 priated may be expended to enable any United States offi22 cer or official to attend the opening ceremonies of the 

23 2008 Olympic Games in the People’s Republic of China. 

24 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION RELATED TO SECU25 RITY.—Nothing in this section shall be construed as proVerDate Aug 31 2005 22:14 Apr 04, 2008 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5697.IH H5697

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5697 IH

1 hibiting the expenditure of Federal funds to provide secu2 rity during the 2008 Olympic Games to any United States 

3 athlete or associated support staff. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT LEONARD RICKY KELLY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. No. 95-6914 FRANKLIN FREEMAN; ERNEST B. FULLWOOD; ROBERT L. FARMER, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-95-198-5-F) Submitted: October 31, 1995 Decided: April 23, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Leonard Ricky Kelly, Appellant Pro Se.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Leonard Ricky Kelly appeals from a district court order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) claim. We affirm the order in part, v acate in part, and remand. Kelly's suit involves his transfer from a North Carolina prison to an Oklahoma prison. He contends that one state judge improperlyfailed to advise Kelly about the possibility of such a transfer. He contends that another state judge denied him due process by dismissing his state claim against the first judge. Finally, he contends that the state Secretary of Corrections breached Kelly's plea agreement by transferring him to an Oklahoma prison to serve the remainder of the sentence. The district court properly found that the two state judges were immune from damages because they were not acting in the clear absence of jurisdiction. Stump v. Sparkman , 435 U.S. 349 (1978). The district court, however, operated under a fundamental misconception of law regarding Kelly's claim that his plea agreement was breached. The court believed that the claim was not federal in nature. This is incorrect. E.g. , Santobello v. New York , 404 U.S. 257 (1971). Thus, the district court abused its discretion is dismissing this claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). James v. Jacobson , 6 F.3d 233, 239 (4th Cir. 1993) (abuse of discretion to dismiss under§ 1915(d) where exercise of discretion flawed by erroneous legal premise). Thus, although we affirm the order with regard to the dismissal of the complaint against the state court judges, we vacate that portion of the district court order dismissing Kelly's claim against the Secretaryregarding breach of the plea agreement. We remand that claim for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion. We express no opinion on the ultimate merits of the claim or other defenses to the claim. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED
2
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5568 

To amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility 

Act of 1996 to clarify requirements relating to the construction of a 

physical fence along the southwest border, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2008 

Mr. GRAVES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 

Responsibility Act of 1996 to clarify requirements relating to the construction of a physical fence along the 

southwest border, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Start Building a Real 

5 Fence Act of 2008’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5568 IH

1 SEC. 2. PHYSICAL FENCING ALONG THE SOUTHWEST BOR2 DER. 

3 (a) REMOVAL OF LIMITATION QUALIFICATION.—Sec4 tion 102 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immi5 grant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1103 note), 

6 as amended by section 564 of division E of the Consoli7 dated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110–161), 

8 is amended by striking subparagraph (D) of subsection 

9 (b)(1) of such section 102. 

10 (b) CLARIFICATION THAT FENCING SHALL BE

11 PHYSICAL.—Section 102 of the Illegal Immigration Re12 form and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 is further 

13 amended— 

14 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘, including 

15 physical fencing,’’ after ‘‘physical barriers’’; 

16 (2) in subsection (b)— 

17 (A) in the subsection heading, by inserting 

18 ‘‘PHYSICAL’’ before ‘‘FENCING’’; 

19 (B) in paragraph (1)— 

20 (i) in the paragraph heading, by in21 serting ‘‘PHYSICAL’’ before ‘‘FENCING’’; 

22 (ii) in subparagraph (A)— 

23 (I) in the subparagraph heading, 

24 by inserting ‘‘PHYSICAL’’ before 

25 ‘‘FENCING’’; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5568 IH

1 (II) by inserting ‘‘physical’’ be2 fore ‘‘fencing along’’; and 

3 (III) by inserting ‘‘such’’ before 

4 ‘‘fencing would’’; 

5 (iii) in subparagraph (B)— 

6 (I) in clause (i), by inserting 

7 ‘‘physical’’ before ‘‘fencing’’; and 

8 (II) in clause (ii), by inserting 

9 ‘‘physical’’ before ‘‘fencing’’; and 

10 (iv) in subparagraph (C)(i), by insert11 ing ‘‘physical’’ before ‘‘fencing’’; 

12 (C) in paragraph (2), by inserting ‘‘phys13 ical’’ before ‘‘fences’’; 

14 (D) in paragraph (3)— 

15 (i) by inserting ‘‘physical’’ before 

16 ‘‘fencing’’; and 

17 (ii) by inserting ‘‘physical’’ before 

18 ‘‘fence’’; and 

19 (3) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘barriers 

20 and roads’’ and inserting ‘‘physical fencing, barriers, 

21 and roads’’. 

22 (c) REPEAL.—Subsection (b) of section 564 of divi23 sion E of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 

24 (Public Law 110–161) is repealed. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of NationsRent Companies, Inc.
("NationsRent") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas J. Hoyer, the Chief Financial Officer of NationsRent, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)      The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)      The information contained in such the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of NationsRent.

Date: March 30, 2005

| | /s/ Thomas J. Hoyer
      Thomas J. Hoyer
      Chief Financial Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 17, 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00864- CV

TARIN ARCHIBALD NGUYEN, Appellant

V. TUAN M. NGUYEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-45631

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 8, 2017. The notice of appeal was filed October 5, 2018. To date, our records show that appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs). Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207

.2

On November 29, 2018, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate fi ling fee on or before December 14, 2018, or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order

. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5631 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ‘‘Corporal Bradley 

T. Arms Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2008 

Mr. GOODE (for himself, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. 

CANTOR, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. FORBES, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mrs. 

DRAKE, Mr. WOLF, and Mr. MORAN of Virginia) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORPORAL BRADLEY T. ARMS POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1155 Seminole Trail in CharVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:33 Mar 15, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5631.IH H5631

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5631 IH

1 lottesville, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

2 ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. 

7 Arms Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
IB 

Union Calendar No. 407 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5571 

[Report No. 110–646] 

To extend for 5 years the program relating to waiver of the foreign country 

residence requirement with respect to international medical graduates. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2008 

Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

MAY 15, 2008 

Additional sponsor: Mr. MORAN of Kansas 

MAY 15, 2008 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 

A BILL 

To extend for 5 years the program relating to waiver of 

the foreign country residence requirement with respect 

to international medical graduates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5571 RH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER PROGRAM. 

2 Section 220(c) of the Immigration and Nationality 

3 Technical Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note) 

4 is amended by striking ‘‘June 1, 2008’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘June 1, 2013’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 407 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5571 

[Report No. 110

–646] 

A BILL 

To extend for 5 years the program relating to waivwith respect to international medical graduates. er of the foreign country residence requirement 

MAY 15, 2008 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                  August 3, 2005

Interactive Systems Worldwide Inc.
2 Andrews Drive
2nd Floor
West Paterson, NJ 07424

                  Re:  Voting Agreement
                       ----------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         Reference us made to that certain Securities Purchase Agreement, dated
as of the date hereof (the "Purchase Agreement"), by and among Interactive
Systems Worldwide Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and the
purchasers identified on the signature pages thereto (the "Purchasers"). All
capitalized terms used in this letter agreement have the meanings defined for
them in the Purchase Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein.

         Each of the undersigned, being an officer, director and/or shareholder
of the Company, does hereby agree to vote, at the annual meeting of shareholders
of the Company (which such annual meeting is to be held on or before March 31,
2006)(the "Meeting"), all of the shares of common stock, par value $.001, of the
Company owned by such officer, director and/or shareholder as of the record of
the Meeting, in favor of any approval as may be required by the applicable rules
and regulations of NASDAQ Small-Cap with respect to the transactions
contemplated by the Transaction Documents, including, without limitation, the
approval of the issuance of all of the Underlying Shares in excess of 19.9% of
the Company's issued and outstanding Common Stock on the Closing Date.


<PAGE>

         This letter agreement shall be governed by and interpreted according to
the laws of the state of New York, without giving effect to principles of
conflicts of law thereof.

                            Sincerely,

                            /s/ Barry Mindes
                            Barry Mindes


                            MINDES FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
                            by Mindes Family G.P. Corp., its general partner


                            /s/ Barry Mindes
                            Barry Mindes, President


                            /s/ Bernard Albanese
                            Bernard Albanese


                            THE MARIE ALBANESE TRUST


                            /s/ Marie Albanese
                            Marie Albanese, trustee


                            /s/ Christine Albanese
                            Christine Albanese, trustee


                            /s/ Fredric Kupersmith
                            Fredric Kupersmith


                            /s/ Bruce Feldman
                            Bruce Feldman


                            /s/ Harold Rapaport
                            Harold Rapaport


                            /s/ Andrew Harbison
                            Andrew Harbison


                            /s/ James McDade
                            James McDade
STATE of North Carolina v. Cleveland Wesley HELLER.

No. 478P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

David Childers, Mount Holly, for Cleveland W. Heller.

Neal Dalton, Assistant Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 31st day of August 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."