alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1

                           ADDENDUM TO PROMISSORY NOTE

            THIS  ADDENDUM  TO  PROMISSORY   NOTE  (this  " Addendum")  is dated
August  5,  2005,   between   MICROHELIX,   INC.,  an  Oregon  corporation  (the
"Borrower"), and MARTI D. LUNDY (the "Lender").

            A. Borrower made a Promissory  Note dated April 8, 2005 (the "Note")
in favor of the Lender in the principal amount of $1,250,000.00; and

            B. The  parties  desire to amend the Note  pursuant  to the terms of
this Addendum.

            For good and valuable consideration,  the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

            1. Continuing  Effectiveness.  Except as modified herein, all of the
terms,  conditions,  covenants,  and  restrictions  set forth in the Note  shall
remain in full force and effect among the parties.

            2.  Payment.  The second  sentence of Section 1 of the Note shall be
amended to read as follows: "The first six payments are due on May 8, 2005, June
8, 2005, July 8, 2005,  August 8, 2005,  September 8, 2005, and October 8, 2005,
and these payments shall be  interest-only  payments in the amount of $10,416.67
each." Except as modified in the preceding sentence, Section 1 of the Note shall
remain in full force and effect among the parties.

                                     BORROWER:

                                     MICROHELIX, INC., an Oregon corporation

                                     By:   /s/ Tyram H. Pettit
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Tyram H. Pettit
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


                                     LENDER:

                                         /s/ Marti D. Lundy
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Marti D. Lundy
Exhibit 32.2

               Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                            As Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the report of Poster Financial Group, Inc., (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Dawn M. Prendes, as
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:


            3.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            4.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.




Dated:  August 12, 2005                            /s/ Dawn Prendes
                                                   -------------------------
                                                   Dawn Prendes
                                                   Senior Vice President and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

I, Gregg A. Ostrander, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s thirdfiscal quarter of 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 4,2004
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spirit Finance Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher H. Volk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 7, 2006
|   | /s/ Christopher H. Volk |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Christopher H. Volk     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                          13,751
<SECURITIES>                                    14,364
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,215
<ALLOWANCES>                                       322
<INVENTORY>                                     11,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,154
<PP&E>                                          41,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,556
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,833
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,610
<SALES>                                         18,808
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,808
<CGS>                                           10,914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,562<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    15<F2>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    268
<INCOME-TAX>                                        61
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                207
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       207
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.02
<FN>
<F1>Research & Development expenses
<F2>Provision for Bad Debt expense
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-4390

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus ROBERT C. HUNDERTMARK, JR., a/k/a Robert Hundertmark, a/k/a Barry Scheckman, a/k/a Detective Miller, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CR-02-125) Submitted: October 3, 2003 Decided: October 23, 2003 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jon M. Babineau, SAUNDERS, BABINEAU & BREWBAKER, L.L.C., Suffolk, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Robert J. Krask, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert C. Hundertmark, Jr., appeals his conviction and sentence on four counts of knowingly and willfully threatening to kill, injure, and intimidate with an instrument of interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(e) (2000), and three counts of transmitting threats in interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) (2000). On appeal, Hundertmark asserts the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. First, he asserts his alleged statements did not constitute true threats. Second, he asserts the Government failed to prove he made the statements in question. To determine whether there is sufficient evidence to support a conviction, “[t]he verdict of the jury must be sustained if there is substantial evidence, taking the view most favorable to the Government, to support it.” Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). We are of opinion there was such evidence in this case. Hundertmark’s arguments are meritless. The Government’s evidence was sufficient to establish he made threatening statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(e) (2000) and 18 U.S.C. § 875(c) (2000). United States v. Spruill , 118 F.3d 221, 228 (4th Cir. 1997); United States v. Darby , 37 F.3d 1059, 1065 (4th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, we affirm Hundertmark’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 5.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Robin Villeneuve, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Virginia Mines Inc. (the issuer);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  May 14, 2012  /s/ Robin VilleneuveRobin Villeneuve
Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

January 8, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00617

- CR

The STATE of Texas

, Appellant

v.

Heber to GARZA

- GARCIA,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17

- CRS

- 266 The Honorable Everardo Garcia, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

On January 1, 2019, appellee filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief. The motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due on January 22, 2019

. No further extensions will be granted absent extenuating circumstances

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of January, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00319-CR

FREDDIE LEE WALLACE,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 272nd District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 05-03424-CRF-272-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Freddie Lee Wallace filed an article 11.07 petition for writ of habeas corpus. TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2012). The Court of Criminal Appeals 

dismissed it. In this proceeding, he now attempts to appeal the dismissal of his 

application for writ of habeas corpus by the Court of Criminal Appeals. By letter dated 

September 13, 2012, the Clerk of this Court notified Wallace that his appeal was subject 

to dismissal because it appeared this Court had no jurisdiction to review an appeal of 

the Court of Criminal Appeal’s dismissal of an application for writ of habeas corpus. 
Wallace v. State Page 2

Wallace was further warned that the Court would dismiss this appeal unless, within 21 

days of the date of the letter, a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the 

appeal. Wallace filed a response but it does not show grounds for continuing the 

appeal.

We only have jurisdiction of a criminal proceeding when expressly provided by 

law. Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-697 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Wallace has not 

directed our attention to any statue or constitutional provision that gives us jurisdiction 

of the proceeding, and we are aware of none.

This appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 25, 2012

Do not publish

[CR25]
STATE v. HINSON.

No. COA05-1045.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 18, 2006.

Certification Date August 7, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (04CRS91128, 04CRS91131).

Case without published opinion. No error.
# L_2015068EN.01009101.xml

| 13.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/91 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/91

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1190/2012 of 12 December 2012 concerning a Union target for the reduction of Salmonella Enteritidis and Salmonella Typhimurium in flocks of turkeys, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 340 of 13 December 2012
  )

On page 30, recital 8 and Article 1(1), third subparagraph; on page 33, in the Annex, point 3.3, third paragraph and point 4.1, first paragraph; on page 34, point 4.2.1(c) and point 4.2.3, third paragraph:

for:

‘1,4,[5],12:i:-’,

read:

‘
  1,4,[5],12:i:-’.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet of MidAmerican  Energy Company as of March 31, 1998,
and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the three
months  ended March 31,  1998,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
 </LEGEND> 
<RESTATED>
<CIK>                         0000928576
<NAME>                        MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,605,437
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    141,479
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         213,487
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       324,894
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 176,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,461,531
<COMMON>                                       560,562
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            428,523
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 989,085
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                    31,761
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           919,815
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 115,102
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  49,837
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,205,931
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3,461,531
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      447,266
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           24,027 <F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     367,168
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     367,168
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        80,098
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (930)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 79,168
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       21,962
<NET-INCOME>                                   33,179
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    1,237
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  31,942
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       28,600
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      17,553
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         179,495
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>
    INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE includes all income taxes and is excluded from Total
Operating Expenses above and on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Order filed November 10, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00564-CV

____________

RAMESH KAPUR, Appellant

V.

NANIK BHAGIA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020-12994

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed September 28, 2022. Our review has determined 

that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P.

34.5(c). The record does not contain "Notice of Appeal Pending Ruling to 

Reinstate" filed May 4, 2022.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record on or before November 21, 2022, containing the above listed document. 
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.