alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5701 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5701

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acetamiprid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 3, 2008

  Mr. Holden introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acetamiprid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACETAMIPRID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.72 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to (E)-N1-[(6-Chloro-3-
pyridyl)methyl]-N2-cyano-N1-methyl-acetamidine (Acetamiprid)) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. Sidney E. BROWN.

No. 159P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Michael K. Lands, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of March 2006 by Defendant for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2006."
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Apollo Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2020 (the “Report”), I, Howard Widra, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory W. Hunt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1. To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ HOWARD WIDRAHoward WidraChief Executive OfficerNovember 5, 2020


/s/ GREGORY W. HUNTGregory W. HuntChief Financial Officer and TreasurerNovember 5, 2020
LINCOLN COUNTY BD. OF EDUC. v. SanGRA CORP.

No. COA05-963.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
# L_2012338EN.01004401.xml

| 12.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 338/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 338/44

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 488/2012 of 8 June 2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 658/2007 concerning financial penalties for infringement of certain obligations in connection with marketing authorisations granted under Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 150 of 9 June 2012
  )

On page 69, in Article 1, point 7:

for:

‘the obligation to provide, at the request of the Agency, any data demonstrating that the risk-benefit balance remains favourable, as provided for in Article 16(4) and Article 41(4) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004;’,

read:

‘the obligation to provide, at the request of the Agency, any data demonstrating that the risk-benefit balance remains favourable, as provided for in Articles 16(3a) and 41(4) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004;’;

on page 69, in Article 1, point 12:

for:

‘the obligation to submit, at the request of the Agency, a copy of the pharmacovigilance system master file, as provided for in Article 16(4) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004;’,

read:

‘the obligation to submit, at the request of the Agency, a copy of the pharmacovigilance system master file, as provided for in Article 16(3a) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004;’.

---
Exhibit 4.3        CONSENT OF EUGENE PURITCH   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2014 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I participated, as an independent Qualified Person (as such term is defined in Canadian National Instrument 43-101  Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects), in the preparation of an independent technical study, completed in 2009 (the Technical Study) concerning mineralized material in the Coulon property for the Company. Portions of the Technical Study are summarized under the heading Item III  Description of the Business  Coulon Property  3.1.5 Exploration and Drilling in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2014 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,


| |                               |  | 
| | ----------------------------- |  | 
| | /S/
Eugene Puritch            |  | 
| | Name:
Eugene Puritch, P. Eng. |  | 

May 15, 2014
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward
      E. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








*/s/
                Edward E. Cohen*Edward
                E. CohenChief
                Executive OfficerMay
                10, 2007
STATE of North Carolina v. Terry Delane SINCLAIR.

No. 718P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Terry Delane Sinclair, Pro Se.

Thomas G. Meacham, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 28th day of December 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
SMITH BARNEY MUNI FUNDS
(Florida, Georgia, Limited Term, National, New York and Pennsylvania 
Portfolios)
SMITH BARNEY INTERMEDIATE MUNICIPAL FUND, INC.
SMITH BARNEY MUNICIPAL FUND, INC.
(the "Funds")

Supplement dated December 19, 1996 to the Prospectuses*


Each Fund's Board of Directors/Trustees has approved the addition of zero 
coupon bonds to the list of authorized investments.  A zero coupon bond pays 
no interest in cash to its holder during its life, although interest is 
accrued during that period.  Its value to an investor consists of the 
difference between its face value at the time of maturity and the price for 
which it was acquired, which is generally an amount significantly less than 
its face value (sometimes referred to as a "deep discount" price).  Because 
such securities usually trade at a deep discount, they will be subject to 
greater fluctuations of market value in response to changing interest rates 
than debt obligations of comparable maturities which make periodic 
distributions of interest.  On the other hand, because there are no periodic 
interest payments to be reinvested prior to maturity, zero coupons securities 
eliminate the reinvestment risk and lock in a rate of return to maturity

____________________
*Prospectuses dated:

Smith Barney Muni Funds-(Georgia, National and Pennsylvania Portfolios)       
July 1, 1996
Smith Barney Muni Funds-(Florida, Limited Term and New York Portfolios)        
July 29, 1996 
Smith Barney Intermediate Municipal Fund, Inc.                                  
March 29, 1996
Smith Barney Municipal Fund, Inc.                                              
March 29, 1996


FD      


g/funds/sbfi/misc/multiskr
STATE of North Carolina v. Kelvin Jerome BETHEA.

No. 74P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Kelvin J. Bethea, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 9th day of February 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wake County, the following order was entered *134and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stratum Holdings, Inc. (the “smallbusiness issuer”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Richard A. Piske, III, Chief Executive Officer of the small business issuer,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of thisSarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the small business issuer.
|        |   | /s/ Richard A. Piske, III |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   | Richard A. Piske, III     |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer   |
|   |   | August 17, 2007           |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Nicholas W. Baxter, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Gerald R. Tuskey, Chief Financial Officer, of Eurasia Energy Limited, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Eurasia Energy Limited for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Eurasia Energy Limited.









Dated November 13, 2007

/s/Nicholas W. Baxter

Nicholas W. Baxter,

President and Chief Executive Officer





/s/Gerald R. Tuskey

Gerald R. Tuskey,

Chief Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer
[Cite as State v. Brown, 2017-Ohio-64.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO 

TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

State of Ohio, : 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : 

v. : No. 16AP-634 

 (C.P.C. No. 09CR-5367) 

Victor L. Brown, : 

 (ACCELERATED CALENDAR) 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

 

D E C I S I O N 

Rendered on January 10, 2017 

 

On brief: Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, and Steven L. 

Taylor, for appellee. 

On brief: Victor L. Brown, pro se. 

 

APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas 

TYACK, P.J. 

{¶ 1} Victor L. Brown is appealing from the trial court's refusal to order that the 

court costs be refunded which he paid in a criminal case in which he was the defendant. 

The State of Ohio has filed a brief in which it states that the costs should, in fact, be 

refunded to Brown. 

{¶ 2} We, therefore, sustain Brown's sole assignment of error which reads: 

The trial court has refused to follow the mandate of the 

Tenth District Court of Appeals when it directed the court to 

proceed in accordance of law that dismissed defendant's 

conviction and sentence but did not dismiss the fines 

associated with the conviction in contravention to law. 

{¶ 3} Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and enter judgment 

compelling the refunding of the court costs in the amount of $138.57 collected in Brown's 
No. 16AP-634 2 

case in which his conviction was vacated and in which his case was subsequently 

dismissed. 

Judgment reversed; 

Judgment entered for appellant. 

BROWN and HORTON, JJ., concur.
# L_2014160DE.01004001.xml

| 29.5.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 160/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 160/40

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 258/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 14. März 2012 zur Umsetzung des Artikels 10 des Protokolls der Vereinten Nationen gegen die unerlaubte Herstellung von Schusswaffen, dazugehörigen Teilen und Komponenten und Munition und gegen den unerlaubten Handel damit, in Ergänzung des Übereinkommens der Vereinten Nationen gegen die grenzüberschreitende organisierte Kriminalität (VN-Feuerwaffenprotokoll) und zur Einführung von Ausfuhrgenehmigungen für Feuerwaffen, deren Teile, Komponenten und Munition sowie von Maßnahmen betreffend deren Einfuhr und Durchfuhr

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 94 vom 30. März 2012
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 94 vom 30. März 2012

Inhaltsverzeichnis und Seite 1, Titel:

anstatt:

„Verordnung (EU) Nr. 258/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 14. März 2012 zur Umsetzung des Artikels 10 des Protokolls der Vereinten Nationen gegen die unerlaubte Herstellung von Schusswaffen, dazugehörigen Teilen und Komponenten und Munition und gegen den unerlaubten Handel damit, in Ergänzung des Übereinkommens der Vereinten Nationen gegen die grenzüberschreitende organisierte Kriminalität (VN-Feuerwaffenprotokoll) und zur Einführung von Ausfuhrgenehmigungen für Feuerwaffen, deren Teile, Komponenten und Munition sowie von Maßnahmen betreffend deren Einfuhr und Durchfuhr“

muss es heißen:

„Verordnung (EU) Nr. 258/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 14. März 2012 zur Umsetzung des Artikels 10 des Protokolls der Vereinten Nationen gegen die unerlaubte Herstellung von Feuerwaffen, dazugehörigen Teilen und Komponenten und Munition und gegen den unerlaubten Handel damit, in Ergänzung des Übereinkommens der Vereinten Nationen gegen die grenzüberschreitende organisierte Kriminalität (VN-Feuerwaffenprotokoll) und zur Einführung von Ausfuhrgenehmigungen für Feuerwaffen, deren Teile, Komponenten und Munition sowie von Maßnahmen betreffend deren Einfuhr und Durchfuhr“.

---
90 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

OREGON

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$326.6 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,614

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

 Military

Multnomah 4,190 376 1,691

Marion 1,351 21 309

Clackamas 1,324 44 265

Klamath 1,259 136 400

Lane 893 65 171

Umatilla 590 ND 195

Jackson 424 ND 50

Clatsop 314 ND 72

Benton 259 72 10

Deschutes 247 ND 44

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 66%

Active Duty: 6%

Civilian: 28%

68%

8%

24%

0%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

By Type

Service: 54%

Construction: 9%

Research and 

Development: 3%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 34%

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions)

Vectrus $261.3 M

AECOM $164.1 M

Vigor Industrial $128.1 M

Identity Theft Guard Solutions $127.9 M

EPIC Aviation $41.0 M

FLIR Systems $35.1 M

Boeing $31.5 M

Manson Construction $23.3 M

Rockwell Collins-ESA Vision Systems $18.4 M

Port of Portland $18.0 M

34%

25%

5%

36%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

$1.4

$1.2

$0.8

$0.7 $0.7

$1.2 $1.2

$0.8

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 91

 Multnomah

Sherman

Marion

Umatilla

Klamath 

Lane

Clatsop Wasco

 Multnomah

Washington

Hood River

Marion

Umatilla

Yamhill 

Lane

Clatsop Wasco

Clackamas

Multnomah County

$154.3 M

Marion County

$34.3 M

Klamath County 

$34.2 M

Clackamas County

$19.5 M

Umatilla County

$15.8 M

Lane County

$15.7 M

Wasco County

$11.6 M

Sherman County

$11.0 M

Clatsop County

$5.2 M

Jackson County

$4.6 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions) (M=millions)

Washington County

$445.9 M

Umatilla County

$192.0 M

Clackamas County

$166.4 M

Multnomah County

$152.5 M

Marion County

$50.8 M

Clatsop County

$28.2 M

Hood River County

$24.9 M

Lane County

$23.1 M

Yamhill County

$20.0 M

Wasco County

$17.2 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

#40

$1.5 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#48

0.7% OF STATE GDP

0.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$371

ER RESIDENT

#40

$1.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#41

12,614 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#40

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

P

FISCAL YEAR 2016 OREGON

Jackson

Clackamas

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active
STATE v. CASTANO.

No. COA05-1352.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CRS239984, 04CRS239985).

Case without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Terris Lee EDMONDSON.

No. 125P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Staples Hughes, Appellate Defender, for Terris Lee Edmondson.

Nancy Dunn, Associate Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th day of March 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
AMERICOMM DIRECT MARKETING, INC.

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                        (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT RATIO DATA)



AMERICOMM DIRECT MARKETING, INC. -

HISTORICAL DATA


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             For The Years Ended December 31,
                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       1993             1994              1995             1996             1997
                                       ----             ----              ----             ----             ----
<S>                                 <C>              <C>               <C>              <C>               <C>
Loss before income taxes and
  extraordinary items               $(4,893)         $(2,015)          $(1,040)         $(2,199)          $ (762)

Interest expense (a)                   2,873            2,975             3,179            8,126           13,765
                                    --------         --------          --------         --------          -------

  (Loss) Earnings                    (2,020)              960             2,139            5,927           13,003

Interest expense (a)                   2,873            2,975             3,179            8,126           13,765
                                    --------         --------          --------         --------          -------

  Insufficiency                     $  4,893         $  2,015          $  1,040         $  2,199          $   762
                                    ========         ========          ========         ========          ========

Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges                            -                -                -                 -                -
                                    ========         ========         =========         ========          =======
</TABLE>



(a)  Interest expense includes amortization of deferred financing costs and debt
     discounts.