40502 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

4See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Aluminum Extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China: Substantive 

Response to Notice of Initiation of Sunset Review,’’ 

dated March 30, 2022 (Substantive Response). 5See Commerce’s Letter to U.S. International 

Trade Commission, ‘‘Sunset Reviews Initiated on 

March 1, 2022,’’ dated April 20, 2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2022 

Expedited Sunset Review of the Countervailing 

Duty Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the 

People’s Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

7 Id. 

8See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing 

Duty Determination, 76 FR 18521 (April 4, 2011) 

(Final Determination); see also Aluminum 

Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: 

Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2013, 80 FR 77325 (March 

22, 2016) (Final Results 2013 Review). Kong Ah 

International Company Limited was included 

among the cross-owned companies comprising the 

Gyang Ya Group in the Final Determination. 

However, other members of the Gyang Ya Group 

were subsequently reviewed as mandatory 

respondents in the Final Results 2013 Review, while 

Kong Ah International Company Limited was not. 

Therefore, the rates for the additional programs 

found to be countervailable for the individually 

examined Guang Ya Group Companies in the Final 

Results 2013 Review are not the rates for Kong Ah 

International Company Limited. Rather, for 

additional programs found to be countervailable in 

the Final Results 2013 Review, we have used the 

average of the rates of the companies individually 

examined. 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 On April 20, 

2022, Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission that we 

did not receive a substantive response 

from the Government of China or any 

respondent interested party to the 

proceeding.5 As a result, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(l)(ii)(B)(2) and (C)(2), 

Commerce conducted an expedited 

(120-day) sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is aluminum extrusions. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review are 

addressed in the accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum.7 The issues 

discussed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum are listed in the appendix 

to this notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b)(1) of the Act, we determine that 

revocation of the Order would be likely 

to lead to continuation or recurrence of 

a net countervailable subsidy at the 

rates listed below: 

Producer/exporter 

Net 

countervailable 

subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Dragonluxe Limited .............................................................................................................................................................................. 374.15 

Foshan Guangcheng Aluminum Co., Ltd., Guang Ya Aluminum Industries Co. Ltd., Guang Ya Aluminum Industries Hong Kong, 

and Yongji Guanghai Aluminum Industry Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................... 12.04 

Kong Ah International Company Limited ............................................................................................................................................ 25.82 8

Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd., Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd., Zhongya Shaped Aluminum HK Holding Ltd ....... 20.18 

Liaoyang Zhongwang Aluminum Profile Co. Ltd./Liaoning Zhongwang Group .................................................................................. 374.15 

Miland Luck Limited ............................................................................................................................................................................. 374.15 

All Others ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 22.96 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order (APO) 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and 

351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: June 29, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rate Likely 

to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidies 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–14488 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Internatonal Trade Administration 

[A–580–885] 

Phosphor Copper From the Republic 

of Korea: Final Results of the First 

Expedited Sunset Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on phosphor copper from the 

Republic of Korea (Korea) would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of dumping at levels 

identified in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40503 

1See Phosphor Copper From the Republic of 

Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 18893 

(April 24, 2017) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 87 

FR 11416 (March 1, 2022) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, 

‘‘Phosphorous Copper from Korea: Notice of Intent 

to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated March 8, 

2022. 

4 Id. at 2. 

5See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, 

‘‘Phosphorous Copper from Korea: Substantive 

Response to the Notice of Initiation of Sunset 

Review,’’ March 24, 2022. 

6See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on March 1, 2022,’’ dated April 20, 2022. 

7A ‘‘master alloy’’ is a base metal, such as copper, 

to which a relatively high percentage of one or two 

other elements is added. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the First 

Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Phosphor Copper from Korea,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 8362. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 24, 2017, Commerce 

published the AD order on phosphor 

copper from Korea.1 On March 1, 2022, 

Commerce published the Initiation 

Notice of the first sunset review of the 

Order, pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 On March 8, 2022, Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

in the sunset review from Metallurgical 

Products Company (the domestic 

interested party), filed in proper form, 

within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic 

interested party claimed interested party 

status pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act as a manufacturer in the United 

States of the domestic like product.4

On March 24, 2022, the domestic 

interested party filed a complete 

substantive response within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).5 Commerce did not 

receive a substantive response from any 

respondent interested party with respect 

to this proceeding. Further, no hearing 

was requested. On April 20, 2022, 

Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission of the 

lack of a substantive response.6 As a 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is master alloys 7 of copper 

containing between five percent and 17 

percent phosphorus by nominal weight, 

regardless of form (including but not 

limited to shot, pellet, waffle, ingot, or 

nugget), and regardless of size or weight. 

Subject merchandise consists 

predominantly of copper (by weight), 

and may contain other elements, 

including but not limited to iron (Fe), 

lead (Pb), or tin (Sn), in small amounts 

(up to one percent by nominal weight). 

Phosphor copper is frequently produced 

to JIS H2501 and ASTM B–644, Alloy 

3A standards or higher; however, 

merchandise covered by the order 

includes all phosphor copper, regardless 

of whether the merchandise meets, fails 

to meet, or exceeds these standards. 

Merchandise covered by the Order is 

currently classified in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under subheading 

7405.00.1000. This HTSUS subheading 

is provided for convenience and 

customs purposes; the written 

description of the scope of the Order is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.8 A 

list of the topics discussed in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is attached 

as the appendix to this notice. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the Order 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping, and that the 

magnitude of the weighted-average 

dumping margin likely to prevail is up 

to 8.43 percent. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: June 29, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping 

Likely to Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Expedited Sunset 

Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–14417 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–840] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From India: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

producers and/or exporters of certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from 

India made sales at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR) 

February 1, 2020, through January 31, 

2021. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Terre Keaton Stefanova or Adam 

Simons, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1280 or 

(202) 482–6172, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES