P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shed an d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10187 Su m m ar y Cal endar
B A R B A R AM B US H Pl ai nt i f f

- Appe l l ant

v. W ARD EN GI N N Y VAN BU REN ; DR ED U LFO G ON ZALEZ; DR TREN T H EVAN S ; D R A DR I A NAR E S T R E P O; F E DE R A L ME DI C A L C E NT ER CARS W EL L; UNI TE D S TA TE S DEP ART M ENT OF J UST I CE D efen da n t s- A pp el l ees
A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 4: 07- C V

- 743
B ef ore G A R W O O D , JO L L Yan d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * B arbara M
. B u sh ap pea l s t h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s di sm i ssalof her com pl ai n tf

or fai l u re to com pl y w i t h an order and f or fai l u re t o st ate a c l ai m up on w h i ch rel i ef
c an be g r ant e d. T h e di st ri ctcourtdi sm i ssed B u sh’ s com pl ai n tforfai l u re to resubm i ther
c o m p la in t o n a p a r tic u la rfo r m r e q u ir e d fo rp r is o n e rciv il rig h ts co m p la in ts
. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 10187

2 T h e di sm i ssalapp ears t o be w i t h prej u di ce, bu ti ti s dou btf u lt h at the rec ord
r e fle c ts th e n e c e s s a r ycle a rre c o r d o f d e la yo rco n tu m a c io u s co n d u c t. S ee B err y v . CIGNA/ RSI

- CIGNA, 9 7 5 F .2d 1 1 8 8 , 1 1 9 1 (5t h C ir. 1 9 9 2 ). Th e di st r i c tc our tal t er nat ivel y di sm i ssed the c om pl ai ntpurs uant t o 2 8 U
. S. C
. § 1915( e) ( 2 )( B )(i i ) for fai l ure t o s t at e ac l ai m on w hi c h re l i ef c oul d be g ra n te d
. B u sh m a d e s e v e ra l re q u e sts in th e d istr ict co u rt for a p p o in tm e n t of a gua r di an adl i t e m a nd f o rt he r e t ur n o f

pe r s o nali t e m s al l e ge dl y r e t ai ne d a tt he F ede r al M e di c al Cent e r - Car s w e l l
. Bush has no t ad dr e s s e d t he s e c l ai m s on ap pea l
. Sh e ha s aban don ed a n y c h al l en ge t o t h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s di sposi t i on of th e s e cla im s . S ee Y

oh ey v. Col l i n s, 9 85 F. 2d2 22 , 22 4- 25 ( 5t h Ci r . 19 93 )
. To t he ext entB ush i s se eki ng t o r ai se c l ai m s of r et al i at i on, physi c alas sa ul tand s exual har as s m e nt , a nd d e ni alo f a c c e s s t o t he c o ur t s i n he r ap pe l l at e b r i e f, w e de c l i ne to con sider th ose cl a i m s b eca u se t h ey w ere n ot ra i sed b e lo w . S ee Leve r e t t ev. L ou i svi l le La d d er Co. , 1 8 3 F .3d 3 3 9 , 3 4 2 (5t h C ir. 1 9 9 9 ). Al t ho ugh he rpl e ad i ngs ar e so m e w hatunc l e ar , Bus h’ s pr i m ar y ar gum e nt ap pea rs t o be th a t a d istr i ctcourtl acks au t h ori t y t o order f orced m edi cat i on unl e s s c e r t ai n a dm i ni s t r at ive a nd p r o c e dur alr e qui r e m e nt s a r e s at i s f i e d a nd th a t th o s e p r o c e d u r e s w e r e n o t fo llo w e din h e rca s e . S ee2 8 C. F. R. § 5 49
. 43
. The U ni t ed St at es D i st r i c tC our tf orthe D i st r i c tof

M ar yl and or der ed t hatB ush be f o r c ibl y m e di c at e d i n c o nne c t i o n wi t h he r pe ndi ng c r i m i nalc as e ; t he r e f o r e , t he pr o pe rf

o r um f o rBus h’ s ch al l en ge i s he rpe ndi ng ap pe alo f t hato r de rt o t he U n ite d S ta te s C o u r t o f A p p e a ls fo rth e F o u r th C ir c u it. S ee2 8 U .S .C
. § 1 2 9 4 (1 ). AP P EA L DI S M I S S ED
.