alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for Eastern

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

________________

No. 01-1701

________________

Sandra L. Marxkors,

Appellant,

v.

GTE Wireless, Inc.,

Appellee.

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the 

Eastern District of Missouri.

[UNPUBLISHED]

________________

Submitted: September 10, 2001

 Filed: October 4, 2001 

________________

Before MCMILLIAN, BEAM, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. 

________________

PER CURIAM.

Sandra Marxkors appeals the district court's1 dismissal of her action under the

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 and 623(a)(1)

(1994), against her former employer, GTE Wireless, Inc. (GTE). Marxkors filed this

action after she lost her position when GTE eliminated and reorganized part of its
2

workforce in its St. Louis, Missouri, office. Having conducted de novo review, Britton

v. City of Poplar Bluff, Mo., 244 F.3d 994, 996 (8th Cir. 2001), we affirm.

Marxkors presented no direct evidence of age discrimination. Therefore, the

district court employed the burden-shifting analysis of McDonnell Douglas Corp. v.

Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), and St. Mary's Honor Ctr. v. Hicks, 509 U.S. 502 (1993).

The district court assumed for the purposes of summary judgment that Marxkors had

established her prima facie case, but it concluded that GTE had articulated a legitimate,

nondiscriminatory reason for the adverse employment action. See McDonnell Douglas,

411 U.S. at 802. Marxkors did not dispute that her attendance and punctuality were

poor, that she had made personal calls in violation of company policy, that her

performance was unsatisfactory, or that the two younger employees retained after the

reorganization each had performance evaluations superior to hers. Marxkors failed to

present any evidence that these reasons for not retaining her after the reorganization

were pretextual. See id. at 804; Ryther v. KARE 11, 108 F.3d 832, 838 (8th Cir.) (en

banc) ("Obviously, in all age discrimination cases, the plaintiff must produce sufficient

evidence of the elements of the prima facie case and where necessary, adduce sufficient

proof of pretext to meet the traditional tests of summary judgment. . . ."), cert. denied,

521 U.S. 1119 (1997). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5387 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5387

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Frescolat MGA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Frescolat MGA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FRESCOLAT MGA.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Menthone Glycerin   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          Acetal (CAS No.                                                    31/2011.......
                          63187-91-7)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2932.99.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001019779
<NAME> CUNO, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,433
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,179
<INVENTORY>                                     27,646
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,012
<PP&E>                                         108,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                  52,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,842
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,848
<BONDS>                                         15,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,561
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,842
<SALES>                                        198,845
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               198,845
<CGS>                                          112,541
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,541
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   141
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,249
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,894
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,355
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.22

                   AMENDMENT TO THE SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.22



                   AMENDMENT TO THE SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT


        1. The Parties hereby agree that Xin Net Corp. has full and unrestricted
rights to appoint the entire Board of Beijing Quicknet Telecommunications Corp.
Ltd. (Beijing Quicknet) for as long as Xin Net is a shareholder.  Sellers hereby
grant their irrevocable proxy to Xin Net to vote all of their shares for the
appointment and election of directors, and the board will have the exclusive
right to appoint officers and managers.  A formal Proxy will be expected at
closing.

        2.  The Parties hereby agree that 49% will be transferred immediately to
Xin Net Corp. upon closing, another 2% of Beijing Quicknet will be conveyed for
US$100 (USD) when either of the following is completed to the satisfaction of
Xin Net Corp.:

            A.  The appropriate government ministry in China approves of the
            transfer of the 2% ownership in Beijing Quicknet.

            B.  Another legal mechanism for transfer of the 2% ownership of
            Beijing Quicknet is arranged.

Date:  Feb. 20, 2004


                                        SIGNATURES


                                        /s/ Angela Du
                                        -----------------------------------



                                        /s/ Hu, Fang
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Fang Hu



                                        /s/ Yu, Bo
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Bo Yu
Exhibit 4.10      CONSENT OF LOUIS GRENIER   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2011 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Louis Grenier, staff member of the Company, participated, in the preparation of Rapport technique et recommendations, Programme de decapage mecanique, Projet Ashuanipi, Quebec, Mars 2011 (the Technical Study) concerning mineralized material in the Ashuanipi property for the Company.   Portions of the Technical Study are summarized under the heading Item III Description of the Business  3.4.4 Geological Setting, 3.4.5 Exploration Work and Drilling, and 3.4.6 Mineralization  in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2011 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference therein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.    Very truly yours,   /s/ Louis Grenier Name:  Louis Grenier, B.Sc., P.Geo     May11, 2011
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Velda King, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.









November 10, 2005

/s/Velda King

Date

Velda King,

President, C.E.O. and Director
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00449

- CV
Pennie M. Deligans v. Billy R. Deligans Jr.
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 3 of Montgomery County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 19

- 03

- 03713

- CV

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, havin g considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified be low for observance. April 18, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5240 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5240

  To restore equitable sharing with affected States of revenues from 
                    onshore Federal mineral leases.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2008

  Mr. Udall of Colorado (for himself and Mr. Salazar) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To restore equitable sharing with affected States of revenues from 
                    onshore Federal mineral leases.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equitable Mineral Lease Revenue 
Sharing Restoration Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO DEDUCT FROM AMOUNT OTHERWISE PAYABLE 
              TO EACH STATE.

    Title I of the Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008 (Division F of Public Law 110-161) is 
amended under the heading ``Minerals Management Service'', under the 
heading ``administrative provisions'', by repealing the second 
undesignated paragraph.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Arthur Lee HAMES.

No. 337P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Fred Lamar, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Lisa Miles, for Arthur Lee Hames.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by the Attorney General on the 21st day of June 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of June 2005 by the Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-07-00782-CV

SEA WOLF MARINE TOWING, INC., Sea Wolf Marine Towing

& Transportation, Inc., and Sea Wolf Marine Transportation, L.L.C.,

Appellants

v.

Roberto G. DIAZ,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-06-292

Honorable Alex William Gabert, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 29, 2008

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

On April 3, 2008, we abated this appeal and removed it from the court’s active docket

pursuant to an order of the United States District Court for the district of New Jersey staying all

proceedings. The parties have advised the court that the federal court limitation action has been

dismissed. Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal on the docket of this court. 
04-07-00782-CV

-2-

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant the motion. See TEX.

R.APP.P. 42.1(a)(2). The appeal is dismissed and costs of the appeal are taxed against the party who

incurred them.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Apollo Investment Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016 (the “Report”), I, James C. Zelter, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Gregory W. Hunt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|   |                                                                                                                                       
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | To my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ JAMES C. ZELTERJames C. ZelterChief Executive OfficerNovember 8, 2016


/s/ GREGORY W. HUNTGregory W. HuntChief Financial Officer and TreasurerNovember 8, 2016
WEINBRENNER SHOE CO., INC. v. GILLIS.

No. COA05-855.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg, (03CVS21771).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
DILLON v. CARPENTER

No. COA04-1395.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Richmond (03CVS1018).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
Order entered February 18, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 01107
- CR
EX PARTE EDRICK PAUL FULLER On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas Cou nty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. WX21
- 93010
- J

O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s February 16, 2022 motion to extend the time to file appellant’s amended brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant to file his amended brief on or before February 25, 2022.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATIONS
OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND TREASURER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906
OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report
on Form 10-K of Capital Beverage Corporation (the ” Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”),
I, Benjamin
    Cohen, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.





|Date: April 13, 2018 | By: | /s/ Benjamin Cohen                  
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------
|                     |     | Name: Benjamin
    Cohen            
|                     |     | Title:   Chief Executive
    Officer



In connection with the annual report
on Form 10-K of Capital Beverage Corporation (the ” Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”),
I, Benjamin
    Cohen, hereby certify in my capacity as Treasurer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.





|Date:
    April 13, 2018 | By: | /s/
    Benjamin Cohen                   
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------------------------
|                         |     | Name:
    Benjamin Cohen                 
|                         |     | Title:   Principal
    Accounting Officer