alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AP9 R04

- 30

- 92 S: \ FormsLib \ Civil Bureau \ Civil Courts & Post Judg ment \ Post Trial \ Appeal Status Card Revised 01

- 18

- 2013 R **DATE 4/**  **1 7**  **/ 2015** 

**NOTICE OF APPEALS**

**ASSIGNMENT OF COURT OF APPEALS**

**TO: 1ST**  **COURT OF APPEALS**

**From: Deputy Clerk:**  **MICHELLE LOPEZ** 

**Chris Daniel, District Clerk** 

**Harris County, T E X A S**



### CAUSE : **2014**

**- 66001** 

VOLUME PAGE OR IMAGE # **64760201**

**DUE 7/18/2015**  **ATTORNEY 00791667** 

**NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE 1ST** 

**DATE JUDGMENT SIGNED: 3/20/2015** 

**MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL DATE FILED**  **3/25/2015**

**REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED N/A** 

**NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED 4/13/2015** 

**NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 120** 

**FILE ORDERED :**  **YES NO**  **IMAGED FILED: YES**  **NO**

**CODES FOR NOTICE OF APPEAL:**  **BC, C , O** 

CHRIS DANIEL

Harris County, District Clerk

By: /s/ MICHELLE LOPEZ

**MICHELLE LOPEZ**  **, Deputy**

**BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED** 

**BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED** 

**– GOVERNMENT** 

**C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED** 

**D**

**- ACCELERATED APPEAL** 

**OA NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED** 

**O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED (W/NOTICE OF APPEAL** )

**NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL** JUC8H (NR4#) JUSTICE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM APR 17, 2015(C1)

INT6510 CIVIL CASE INTAKE OPT:

_____ - INT

GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY PAGE: 1 - 2

CASE NUM: 201466001__ PJN>

__ TRANS NUM:

_________ CURRENT COURT: 113 PUB?

_ CASE TYPE: MALPRACTICE - MEDICAL CASE STATUS: DISPOSED (FINAL)

STYLE: KOVALY, SHAN VS ENI, IKEDINOBI U (M D)

=============================================================================

**** INACTIVE PARTIES  

PJN PER/CONN COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY ASSOC. ATTY

NUM NUMBER STAT

_ 00010-0001 AGT NORTHWEST HOUSTON CARDIOLOGY (

_ 00009-0001 AGT ENI HEALTH CARE BY SERVING ITS

_ 00008-0001 AGT ENI, IKEDINOBI U (M D) (P A) B

_ 00007-0001 DEF 06453600 NORTHWEST HOUSTON CARDIOLOGY P EDWARDS, JIM

_ 00006-0001 DEF 06453600 KURUVANKA, TULSIDAS S (M D) EDWARDS, JIM

_ 00005-0001 DEF WOODLANDS HEALTH CARE

_ 00004-0001 DEF 12694200 ENI HEALTH CARE LUNCEFORD, ER

_ 00003-0001 DEF 12694200 IKEDINOBI U ENI M.D P A LUNCEFORD, ER

==> (10) CONNECTION(S) FOUND

1=ACTIVE 2=ATY. INQ. 3=ACT.ENTRY 4=ISS. SERV. 5=DOC. INQ.

6=CASE INQ. 7=BACKWARD 8=FORWARD 9=PTY. ADDR. 10=REFRESH 11=HELPJUC8H (NR4#) JUSTICE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM APR 17, 2015(C1)

INT6510 CIVIL CASE INTAKE OPT:

_____ - INT

GENERAL PARTY INQUIRY PAGE: 2 - 2

CASE NUM: 201466001__ PJN>

__ TRANS NUM:

_________ CURRENT COURT: 113 PUB?

_ CASE TYPE: MALPRACTICE - MEDICAL CASE STATUS: DISPOSED (FINAL)

STYLE: KOVALY, SHAN VS ENI, IKEDINOBI U (M D)

=============================================================================

** ** INACTIVE PARTIES ****

PJN PER/CONN COC BAR PERSON NAME PTY ASSOC. ATTY

NUM NUMBER STAT

_ 00002-0001 DEF 12694200 ENI, IKEDINOBI U (M D) LUNCEFORD, ER

_ 00001-0001 PLT 05512300 KOVALY, SHAN DAVIS, JOHN A

==> (10) CONNECTION(S) FOUND

1=ACTIVE 2=ATY. INQ. 3=ACT.ENTRY 4=ISS. SERV. 5=DOC. INQ.

6=CASE INQ. 7=BACKWARD 8=FORWARD 9=PTY. ADDR. 10=REFRESH 11=HELP
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report on
Form 10-KSB of Marine Exploration, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2007:

          (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Marine Exploration, Inc.




/s/ Miguel Thomas Gonzalez
--------------------------
Miguel Thomas Gonzalez
Chief Executive Officer
February 12, 2008


 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Marine Exploration, Inc.
and will be retained by Marine Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
#### In the Matter of Wing Blake et al., Appellants, v Planning Board of Town of Philipstown et al., Respondents.

[799 NYS2d 746]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Planning Board of the Town of Philipstown dated September 18, 2002, which, after a hearing, approved an application by Edward A. Vrooman and Lynda Vrooman for a two-lot subdivision, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Hickman, J.), dated December 5, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Planning Board of the Town of Philipstown (hereinafter the Planning Board) interpreted the Town’s Open Development Area regulations as authorizing it to exercise discretion in approving subdivision applications that would result in an existing private right-of-way being accessed by more than four lots *(see*
      *487Town of Philipstown Code § 112-34 [A] [1] [d]; § 112-64 [H]; § 112-60 [B]). We agree with the Supreme Court that the Planning Board’s interpretation was neither arbitrary nor capricious, and is supported by the record *(see Matter of Ifrah v Utschig,*98 NY2d 304 [2002]; *Matter of Toys “R” Us v Silva,*89 NY2d 411 [1996]; *Matter of Savetsky v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of Southampton,*5 AD3d 779 [2004]; *Matter of Laidlaw Waste Sys. v Planning Bd. of Town of Islip,*305 AD2d 413 [2003]).

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Schmidt, Adams and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
H. R. 5571 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To extend for 5 years the program relating to waiver of the foreign country residence 

requirement with respect to international medical graduates, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WAIVER PROGRAM. 

Section 220(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Technical 

Corrections Act of 1994 (8 U.S.C. 1182 note) is amended by striking 

‘‘June 1, 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘March 6, 2009’’. 

SEC. 2. EXPANDING THE FLEXIBILITY OF THE CONRAD STATE 30 PROGRAM. 

Section 214(l)(1)(D)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

(8 U.S.C. 1184(l)(1)(D)(ii)) is amended by striking ‘‘5’’ and inserting 

‘‘10’’. 

SEC. 3. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

It is the sense of the Congress that— 

(1) Federal programs waiving the 2-year foreign residence 

requirement under section 212(e) of the Immigration and 

Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1182(e)) for physicians are generally 

designed to promote the delivery of critically needed medical 

services to people in the United States lacking adequate access 

to physician care; and 

(2) when determining the qualification of a location for 

designation as a health professional shortage area, the Secretary of Health and Human Services should consider the needs 

of vulnerable populations in low-income and impoverished 

communities, communities with high infant mortality rates, 
H. R. 5571—2 

and communities exhibiting other signs of a lack of necessary 

physician services. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
##### 



EXHIBIT (31.1)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a/15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;(b)
    
    [omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238 and
33-8760 and Rule 14d-14(a) under the Exchange Act];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  /s/ ELMER DOTYElmer DotyPresident and Chief Executive
Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew
      A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




*/s/
                Matthew A. Jones*Matthew
                A. Jones
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              August
                14, 2007




1
STATE v. James A.G. BUNCH, Jr.

No. 604P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, Valerie M. Asbell, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of December 2005 by Defendant for "Petition for Reconsideration of Pro Se Petition for Discretionary Review Under N.C.G.S. 7A-28(A):"

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of January 2006."
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.2

                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                     CHANGE OF CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      This Second Amendment to the Change of Control Employment Agreement dated
as of July 31, 2001 (the "Change of Control Employment Agreement") between
Belden Inc. (now, Belden CDT Inc. or the "Company") and C. Baker Cunningham (as
amended by the First Amendment to Change of Control Employment Agreement dated
as of June 28, 2004) is entered into as of May 17, 2005.

1. The circumstances surrounding the Executive's announced retirement constitute
Good Reason and, accordingly, upon his leaving the Company, the Executive will
be entitled to receive the benefits under this Agreement in accordance with
Section 8 (Termination Giving Rise to a Termination Payment).

2. Capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined herein, have the
meaning ascribed to such terms in the Change of Control Employment Agreement
and, except as expressly provided herein all provision of the Change of Control
Employment Agreement (as amended by the First Amendment) shall remain in full
force and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment as of
the date and year first above written.

                                            BELDEN CDT INC.

                                            By: /s/ Kevin L. Bloomfield
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Kevin L. Bloomfield

                                            Executive: /s/ C. Baker Cunningham
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       C. Baker Cunningham
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ending March 31,2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antonio
F. Uccello, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 14, 2004

/s/ Antonio F. Uccello, III
Antonio F. Uccello, III
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ending March 31,2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antonio
F. Uccello, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 14, 2004

/s/ Antonio F. Uccello, III
Antonio F. Uccello, III
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5222 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5222

 To rescind funds appropriated by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 
2008, for the City of Berkeley, California, and any entities located in 
 such city, and to provide that such funds shall be transferred to the 
 Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps account of the Department of 
                Defense for the purposes of recruiting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2008

 Mr. Campbell of California (for himself, Mr. Boehner, Mr. Putnam, Mr. 
Carter, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Saxton, Mr. Wilson of 
 South Carolina, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Kline of Minnesota, Mr. 
Poe, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Rogers of Michigan, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. 
Issa, Mr. Tiahrt, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Ms. Fallin, Mr. McCotter, Mr. 
Gohmert, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Herger, Mr. Feeney, Mr. McHenry, Mr. Franks of 
 Arizona, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Mack, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Keller 
  of Florida, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Sullivan, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. Brady of 
 Texas, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Gingrey, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. 
   Cannon, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Hensarling, Mrs. 
Capito, and Mr. King of New York) introduced the following bill; which 
            was referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To rescind funds appropriated by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 
2008, for the City of Berkeley, California, and any entities located in 
 such city, and to provide that such funds shall be transferred to the 
 Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps account of the Department of 
                Defense for the purposes of recruiting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Semper Fi Act''.

SEC. 2. RESCISSION AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS.

    (a) Rescission of Certain Earmarks.--All of the amounts 
appropriated by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 
110-161) and the accompanying report for congressional directed 
spending items for the City of Berkeley, California, or entities 
located in such city are hereby rescinded.
    (b) Transfer of Funds to Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps.--
The amounts rescinded under subsection (a) shall be transferred to the 
``Operation and Maintenance, Marine Corps'' account of the Department 
of Defense for fiscal year 2008 to be used for recruiting purposes.
    (c) Congressional Directed Spending Item Defined.--In this section, 
the term ``congressional directed spending item'' has the meaning given 
such term in paragraph 5(a) of rule XLIV of the Standing Rules of the 
Senate.
                                 <all>
```
Jennie Lynn BILLINGS and Everette Billings v. Jerome H. ROSENSTEIN, M.D., Thomas J. Mascenik, M.D. and Foothills Center for Women, P.A.

No. 648P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 2006.

G. Gray Wilson, Winston-Salem, for Thomas J. Mascenik, M.D.

Bruce W. Berger, Raleigh, L.G. Gordon, Jr., for Jennie L. & Everette Billings.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of November 2005 by Defendant (Mascenik) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of March 2006."

Justice NEWBY recused.
STATE v. ADAMS

No. COA05-1246

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Buncombe (03CRS60414, 03CRS60507).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6577

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DONALD TERRELL RICE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District

Judge. (CR-99-902; CA-01-1913-7-24)

Submitted: June 28, 2004 Decided: July 16, 2004

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Terrell Rice, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Donald Terrell Rice seeks a certificate of appealability

to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Rice has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Rice’s motion for a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE v. SCALES.

No. COA05-643.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS63172).

Case without published opinion. No error.