alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Opportunities for Collaborative 
Research at the NIH Clinical Center.
    Date: July 25, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health 
and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6710B 
Rockledge Drive, Room 2127D, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Assisted 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Luis E. Dettin, Ph.D., MS, MA, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes 
of Health, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Rm. 2127D, Bethesda, MD 20892, 
(301) 827-8231, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f534a564c605b5a4b4b56517f51565711585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a6cad3cfd5f9c2c3d2d2cfc8e6c8cfce88c1c9d0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.865, 
Research for Mothers and Children, National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: July 6, 2022.
David W. Freeman,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-14791 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 3.2**

**STATE*******of*******DELAWARE**

**LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY**

**CERTIFICATE*******of*******FORMATION**

**ARTICLE I**

NAME 

The name of the limited liability company is DUANE READE INTERNATIONAL, LLC (the “Company”). 

**ARTICLE II**

REGISTERED OFFICE; REGISTERED AGENT 

The address of the initial registered office of the Company in the State of Delaware is 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, in the City of Wilmington, County of NewCastle. The name of the initial registered agent of the Company at such address is the Corporation Service Company. 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of Formation this 23rd day of July, 2009.
Exhibit 10(A)



 








EXHIBIT 10(a)




Schedule of Certain Executive Officers who are Parties

to the Severance Pay Agreements in the Forms Attached

as Exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Period Ended June 30, 1997

 




Form A of Severance Pay Agreement




Christopher M. Connor





Form B of Severance Pay Agreement





John L. Ault

Sean P. Hennessy

Thomas E. Hopkins

Conway G. Ivy

Blair P. LaCour

John G. Morikis

Thomas W. Seitz

Louis E. Stellato

Alexander Zalesky
# EUR-Lex - - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

#

**2013/358/EU: Decision of the European Central Bank of 21 June 2013 amending Decision ECB/2010/29 on the issue of euro banknotes (ECB/2013/16) **

*
Official Journal L 187 , 06/07/2013 P. 0013 - 0014 *

Decision of the European Central Bank

of 21 June 2013

amending Decision ECB/2010/29 on the issue of euro banknotes

(ECB/2013/16)

(2013/358/EU)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 128(1) thereof,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular Article 16 thereof,

Whereas:

(1) In view of the accession of Croatia to the European Union and its national central bank (NCB), Hrvatska narodna banka, joining the European System of Central Banks on 1 July 2013, Decision ECB/2013/17 of 21 June 2013 on the national central banks’ percentage shares in the key for subscription to the European Central Bank’s capital [1] provides for the expansion of the key for subscription to the capital of the European Central Bank (hereinafter "capital key") and establishes, with effect from 1 July 2013, the new weightings assigned to each NCB in the expanded capital key (hereinafter the "capital key weightings").

(2) Article 1(d) of Decision ECB/2010/29 of 13 December 2010 on the issue of euro banknotes [2] defines the "banknote allocation key" and refers to Annex I to that Decision, which specifies the banknote allocation key applying since 1 January 2011. Given that new capital key weightings will apply from 1 July 2013, Decision ECB/2010/29 needs to be amended in order to determine the banknote allocation key applying from 1 July 2013,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Amendment

1. The final sentence of Article 1(d) of Decision ECB/2010/29 is replaced by the following: "Annex I to this Decision specifies the banknote allocation key applying from 1 July 2013.".

2. Annex I to Decision ECB/2010/29 is replaced by the text set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on 1 July 2013.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 21 June 2013.

The President of the ECB

Mario Draghi

[1] See page 15 of this Official Journal.

[2] OJ L 35, 9.2.2011, p. 26.

--------------------------------------------------

ANNEX

BANKNOTE ALLOCATION KEY FROM 1 JULY 2013

European Central Bank | 8,0000 % |

Nationale Bank van België/Banque Nationale de Belgique | 3,1975 % |

Deutsche Bundesbank | 24,8130 % |

Eesti Pank | 0,2355 % |

Central Bank of Ireland | 1,4695 % |

Bank of Greece | 2,5770 % |

Banco de España | 10,916 % |

Banque de France | 18,6945 % |

Banca d’Italia | 16,4760 % |

Central Bank of Cyprus | 0,1765 % |

Banque centrale du Luxembourg | 0,2300 % |

Central Bank of Malta | 0,0840 % |

De Nederlandsche Bank | 5,2460 % |

Oesterreichische Nationalbank | 2,5620 % |

Banco de Portugal | 2,3325 % |

Banka Slovenije | 0,4325 % |

Národná banka Slovenska | 0,9100 % |

Suomen Pankki | 1,6475 % |

TOTAL | 100,0000 % |

--------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Biomarkers, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Ronald R. Helm,
President and Chief Executive Officer, and John P. Jensen, Vice President and
Controller, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our
information and belief:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
September 23, 2010





/s/ Ronald R. HelmRonald
      R. HelmPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/ John P. JensenJohn
      P. JensenVice
      President and Controller
REID v. JULIUS BLUM, INC.

No. 170P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Renee Hughes, Charlotte, for Julius Blum, Inc.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of May 2006 by Plaintiff for "Petition for Rehearing":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of June 2006."
EXHIBIT
32.1 CEO CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing Worldwide, Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael Winzkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to my knowledge that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Charles PinkertonCharles
      PinkertonChief
      Executive OfficerFebruary
      16, 2011
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0002469 29-OCT-2014 08:22 AM
exv10w1



 






EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO TEKELEC

2004 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN FOR NEW EMPLOYEES



     Section 3 of the Tekelec 2004 Equity Incentive Plan for New Employees is hereby amended,
effective August 1, 2005, to read in its entirety as follows:




	 	“3.	 	Shares Reserved.





     The maximum aggregate number of Shares reserved for issuance
pursuant to the Plan shall be 6,000,000 Shares or the number of shares
of stock to which such Shares shall be adjusted as provided
in Section 11 of the Plan. Such number of Shares may be set aside
out of authorized but unissued Shares not reserved for any other
purpose, or out of issued Shares acquired for and held in the
treasury of the Company from time to time.



     Shares subject to, but not sold or issued under, any Award
terminating, expiring, forfeited or canceled for any reason prior to
the issuance of such Shares shall again become available for Awards
thereafter granted under the Plan and the same shall not be deemed
an increase in the number of Shares reserved for issuance under the
Plan.”



* * *
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Schedule

To the Stockholders of I-Sector Corporation

In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements of
I-Sector Corporation and subsidiaries referred to in our report dated February
28, 2005, which is included in the Company's 2004 From 10-K, we have also
audited Schedule II for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004. In our
opinion, this schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein.

/s/Grant Thornton LLP
Houston, Texas
February 28, 2005

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE II
I-SECTOR CORPORATION
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004
(In Thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Balance at    Charges to
                                              Beginning     Costs and                      Other       Balance at
               Description                     of Year       Expenses      Write-offs     Changes     End of Year
-------------------------------------------  ------------  -------------  ------------  ------------  ------------
<S>                                          <C>           <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>
Accumulated provision deducted from
related assets on balance sheet
  Allowance for doubtful accounts
  receivable:
                2002                          $  1,253        $   910      $   (1,235)   $         -     $   928
                2003                               928            448            (764)             -         612
                2004                               612            831            (169)             -       1,274

  Allowance for doubtful notes
  receivable:
                2002                                 -            361               -              -         361
                2003                               361            321             (59)             -         623
                2004                               623            515             (16)             -       1,122

  Inventory Reserves
                2002                               144              -            (144)             -           -
                2003                                 -              -               -              -           -
                2004                                 -              -               -              -           -
</TABLE>
HLD-001 (October 2010) NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-2605

___________

GREGORY T. REDMOND,

Appellant

v.

FOUR SEASON HOTEL

____________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil No. 10-cv-02311)

District Judge: Honorable Norma L. Shapiro

____________________________________

Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)

or Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

October 29, 2010

Before: McKEE, Chief Judge, ALDISERT and WEIS, Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: February 14, 2011) 

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM.

In May 2010, Gregory T. Redmond commenced this action by filing a pro 

se complaint against the Four Seasons Hotel in Philadelphia, claiming that, on March 3, 

2006, a security guard prevented Redmond from entering the hotel lobby because of his 

race. Redmond sought damages for an alleged violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1982. 
2

The District Court granted in forma pauperis status and dismissed the complaint sua

sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), noting that the suit is barred under the doctrine 

of res judicata and also time-barred under the statute of limitations. Redmond appeals.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review is plenary. 

Allah v. Seiverling, 229 F.3d 220, 223 (3d Cir. 2000). We must dismiss an in forma

pauperis appeal if we determine that it is “frivolous or malicious.” 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(e)(2)(B)(i); see Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324-25 (1989). 

The District Court correctly concluded that this suit is barred. Redmond 

raised precisely the same allegation against the Four Seasons Hotel in a prior suit, which 

the District Court dismissed on the merits. See E.D. Pa. Civ. No. 09-cv-05698. In 

addition, the District Court denied Redmond’s motion for reconsideration in the prior suit 

and expressly rejected the merits of his claims under §§ 1981 and 1982 for failure to state 

a claim upon which relief can be granted. Given the prior dismissal on the merits, the 

doctrine of res judicata bars Redmond “from initiating a second suit against the same 

adversary based on the same ‘cause of action’ as the first suit.” Duhaney v. Att’y Gen., --

- F.3d ---, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19131, at *16 (3d Cir. Sept. 14, 2010). In addition, as 

fully explained by the District Court, Redmond’s claims are plainly time-barred under the 

statute of limitations. Accordingly, we will dismiss this appeal under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
Exhibit 32

ArQule, Inc.    CERTIFICATE OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND  PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

The undersigned, Paolo Pucci, Chief Executive Officer of ArQule, Inc. (the "Company") and Peter S. Lawrence, President
and Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, both duly elected and currently serving, do each hereby certify that, to the best of his/her
knowledge:



This
certification accompanies the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "2002 Act") and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act.

This
certification is being made for the exclusive purpose of compliance by the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company with the
requirements of Section 906 of the 2002 Act, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other than as specifically required by law.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2009.

|                      |  |                                                                     |  | 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ PAOLO PUCCI       |  |                                                                    
|Name:                 |  | Paolo Pucci                                                         |  | 
|Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer                                             |  | 
|/s/ PETER S. LAWRENCE |  |                                                                    
|Name:                 |  | Peter S. Lawrence                                                   |  | 
|Title:                |  | President and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC. 
 2003 LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
  
 Pursuant to Section 23 of the Caraustar Industries, Inc. 2003 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), Caraustar Industries, Inc.
(the “Company”) does hereby amend the Plan in the following respects. 
  
 1. Effective as of the date of shareholder approval of this Amendment, Section 1 of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “1. Purpose. The purpose of this Plan is to enhance alignment of the interests of selected employees and
directors of Caraustar Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) with the interests of our shareholders by rewarding the participating employees and directors for improving our financial performance in a manner that is consistent with the
creation of increased shareholder value. In furtherance of this objective, awards in the form of common stock purchase options and restricted or unrestricted common stock, or a combination of any of them, may be granted in accordance with the
provisions of this Plan.” 
  
 2. Effective as of the date of
shareholder approval of this Amendment, Section 6 of the Plan is amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 
  
 “6. Eligibility. Awards made under this Plan may be made to (i) any salaried, full-time key executive or operating or staff manager of the
Company or any Subsidiary, (ii) any other salaried, full-time employee of the Company or any Subsidiary who is a significant contributor to the Company’s financial success or (iii) any director of the Company. The Chief Executive Officer shall
nominate eligible employees and directors for participation in this Plan each year, and the Committee shall then select the persons to receive awards under this Plan during that year from the employees and directors so nominated.” 

 
 3. All other references to “employees” in the Plan shall be
deemed to include all employees and directors eligible under Section 6 of the Plan (as amended hereby). 
  
 4. Effective as of the date of shareholder approval of this Amendment, a new Section 8A of the Plan is hereby created to read in its entirety as follows:

  
 “8A. Other Common Stock Awards. The Committee may
from time to time grant to directors awards under this Plan in the form of shares of common stock that are not subject to a risk of forfeiture or restrictions on transfer, or to the limitation on the frequency of grants set forth in clause (ii) of
Section 5. Such awards shall be subject to such terms and conditions, if any, as the Committee may establish at the time of grant.” 
  
 5. As modified hereby, the Plan continues and is hereby confirmed in all respects. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Caraustar Industries, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed by its officers,
this 20 day of June, 2005. 
  

							
	 	 	 	 	CARAUSTAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
				
	 	 	 	 	By:	 	 /s/ Barry A. Smedstad


	 	 	 	 	Name:	 	 Barry A. Smedstad


	 	 	 	 	Title:	 	 Vice President, Human Resources


	 ATTEST:
  
	 	 	 	 
	 /s/ Joyce Waldin

	 	 	 	 
				
	Name:	 	 Joyce Waldin

	 	 	 	 
	Title:	 	 HR Manager
Order entered June 14, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00462-CV

LEN RAO, Appellant

V.

THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-13-00255-B

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s June 12, 2013 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file 

his brief. Appellant shall file his brief on or before July 15, 2013. We caution appellant that no 

further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary 

circumstances. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-11178 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee

v. BURVON KING, also known as Chocolate, Defendant - Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court f or the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:92-CR-141-16

Before BARKSDALE, CLEMENT, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Burvon King, federal p risoner # 21 0 2 9 -077, appeals the district court’s denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) sent e n c e-reduction m otion. (He has filed several such motions previously.) King’s brief is virtually i dentical to the motion filed i n district court. T h e brief fails to identify any error i n the d enial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion. Although a pro se brief is afforded liberal construction, e.g. , Yohey v. Collins , 9 85 F .2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993), whe n appellant fails to identify any error in the district court’s analysis, it i s the same as if appellant U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D May31, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-11178 Document: 00512258965 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2013No. 12-11178

has not appealed that issue, Brinkmann v. Dallas C nty. Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). King h as abandoned the only issue on appeal by failing to brief it adequately. E.g. , Yohey , 985 F.2d at 224-25. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-11178 Document: 00512258965 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/31/2013