alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w1w4



 








Exhibit 10.1.4




Addendum #4 to the

EMPLOYMENT AND SEPARATION AGREEMENT

 




     This employment agreement addendum #4 (“Agreement”) by and between INPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC,
formerly known as Duraswitch Industries, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (“InPlay”), and Robert J.
Brilon (“Employee”), shall be effective as of June 30, 2005.



     Mr. Brilon’s current employment agreement expires on June 30, 2005. Mr. Brilon and InPlay
hereby extend the term of employment of the current employment agreement for a period of one month
to provide additional time for the Compensation Committee to complete work on a new employment
agreement with Mr. Brilon.



     Accordingly, Mr. Brilon’s Term of Employment (Section 2.1) is hereby extended to July 31, 2005.



      



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	/s/ Robert J. Brilon	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

Robert J. Brilon	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	INPLAY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Nevada corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Steve Hanson	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 

Steve Hanson	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Chairman of the Board
**Exhibit 13.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Virginia Gold Mines    Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange    Commission on the date hereof, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section    1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,    that:

1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the    registrant.

 Date: November 25, 2004

*/s/Gaétan Mercier*    Gaetan Mercier    Chief Financial Officer

    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other    document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature    that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement    required by Section 906, has been provided to Virginia Gold Mines Inc. and    will be retained by Virginia Gold Mines Inc. and furnished to the Securities    and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CURRENCY> U. S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       8,299,854
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,509,808
<PP&E>                                         417,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                 123,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,671,987
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,078,666
<BONDS>                                      2,019,916
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       25,009,829
<PREFERRED>                                  2,855,103
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                (22,219,535)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,671,987
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,500,940
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,685,495)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,685,495)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (13.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (13.55)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5540 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 419
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5540

                          [Report No. 110-667]

 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2008

  Mr. Sarbanes (for himself, Mr. Wittman of Virginia, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. 
Gilchrest, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. 
    Cummings, Mr. Ruppersberger, and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

                              May 22, 2008

Additional sponsors: Ms. Norton, Mrs. Drake, Mr. Platts, and Mr. Castle

                              May 22, 2008

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Gateways and 
Watertrails Network Continuing Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 502 of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 
461 note; Public Law 105-312) is amending by striking subsection (c) 
and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 419

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5540

                          [Report No. 110-667]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 22, 2008

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Eddie GILBERT, Jr.

No. 88P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

David Childers, Mount Holly, for Eddie Gilbert, Jr.

Wendy L. Greene, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of February 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Darren William DENNISON.

No. 179P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Darren William Dennison.

Steven Arbogast, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Prior report: ___ N.C.App. ___, 615 S.E.2d 404.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 23rd day of August 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of August 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Stratum Holdings, Inc. (the “smallbusiness issuer”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, D. Hughes Watler, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the small businessissuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of this Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the small business issuer.

 

 
|   | /s/    | D.  Hughes Watler, Jr. |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|   |   | D. Hughes Watler, Jr.  |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |   | June 5, 2008                |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                               Exhibit (10)(xii)
Individual Cash Incentive Arrangements

The Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the
Company (Committee) authorized individual bonus incentives for two executive
officers, Richard D. McBee, Senior Vice President, Communications Business Unit,
and Craig L. Overhage, Senior Vice President, Instruments Business Unit. Each
executive will receive a bonus of up to $100,000 each year for fiscal years
ending May 27, 2006, and May 26, 2007, upon attainment of performance objectives
established by the Committee. For Mr. McBee, the performance objectives are
attaining specified sales and income levels, completing certain organizational
development projects, and achieving specified customer focused goals. For Mr.
Overhage, the performance objectives are meeting specified product development
milestones, attaining specified sales levels in new product categories, and
achieving market share objectives. The Committee may modify, in its sole
discretion, the performance objectives, and will have sole and exclusive
authority to determine whether the performance objectives have been met.
STATE v. Glenn Devon McKINNEY.

No. 622P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 7, 2005.

Paul Herzog, Fayetteville, for Glenn Devon McKinney.

R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of November 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 7th day of November 2005."
**Exhibit 23.3**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**
We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in theRegistration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-107799) and related Prospectus ofIntrogen Therapeutics, Inc. for the registration of shares of its common stockand to the incorporation by reference therein of our report dated January 16,2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of IntrogenTherapeutics, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Austin, Texas
SHEPARD v. OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, et al.

No. 476A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 5, 2006.

Mallam J. Maynard, Maria D. McIntyre, Charlotte, Chandra T. Taylor, J. Jerome Hartzell, Raleigh, for Wayne & Rosemary Shepard.

Matthew T. McKee, for Ocwen Federal Bank, et al.

*467Carlene McNulty, for NC Justice Center, et al.

Hazel Mack-Hilliard, Susan Gottsegen, Winston-Salem, for Legal Aid Soc. of Northwest NC.

Kenneth L. Schorr, for Legal Ser. of Southern Piedmont.

William J. Whalen, for Pisgah Legal Services.

Gary W. Jackson, for NC Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Seth P. Rosebrock, for Center of Responsible Lending.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of December 2005 by Defendants to Amend Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of January 2006."
STATE v. MARTIN

No. COA04-366.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed November 15, 2005.

Certification Date December 5, 2005

Appeal from the Watauga (02CRS3079).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Dismissed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7116

CONRAD VOLCY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MARTIN MCDADE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District

Judge. (CA-01-502-H)

Submitted: December 19, 2002 Decided: December 31, 2002

Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Conrad Volcy, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Conrad Volcy seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a

habeas corpus proceeding in which the detention complained of

arises out of process issued by a state court unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). As to claims dismissed by a district

court solely on procedural grounds, a certificate of appealability

will not issue unless the petitioner can demonstrate both “(1)

‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the

petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional

right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it debatable

whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling.’”

Rose v. Lee, 252 F. 3d 676, 684 (4th Cir. 2001) (quoting Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)), cert. denied, 122 S.Ct. 318

(2001). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons

stated by the district court that Volcy has not satisfied either

standard. See Volcy v. McDade, No. CA-01-502-H (E.D.N.C. June 26,

2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We deny Volcy’s motion for appointment of
3

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

78 

KAH 09-00972 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. 

JOHN D. VANILLE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

SUPERINTENDENT, ORLEANS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, 

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL 

SERVICES, NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE 

AND NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, 

RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

ANDREW M. CUOMO, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. 

EMMETT J. CREAHAN, DIRECTOR, MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE, BUFFALO

(VICKY L. VALVO OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orleans County (Tracey

A. Bannister, J.), entered May 8, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to

CPLR article 70. The order granted the petition for a writ of habeas

corpus and directed respondent New York State Department of

Correctional Services to release petitioner from custody. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs (see generally CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; Hughes v Nussbaumer,

Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988).

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5221 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5221

                 For the relief of Kumi Iizuka-Barcena.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

  Mr. Reyes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Kumi Iizuka-Barcena.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR KUMI IIZUKA-BARCENA.

    (a) In General.--Kumi Iizuka-Barcena, the widow of a citizen of the 
United States, shall be classified as an immediate relative within the 
meaning of section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act for purposes of the approval of a relative visa petition filed 
under section 204 of such Act by her deceased spouse and the filing of 
an application for an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status by 
Kumi Iizuka-Barcena.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Kumi Iizuka-Barcena enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply 
only if Kumi Iizuka-Barcena files an application for reconsideration of 
the revocation of the approval of the relative visa petition referred 
to in subsection (a) with appropriate fees not later than 2 years after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Kumi Iizuka-Barcena, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
for the current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level of 
family-sponsored immigrants under section 201(c)(1)(A) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 4.13      CONSENT OF JEAN-FRANÇOIS BÉLANGER   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2014 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Jean-François Bélanger, staff member of Anglo American Exploration (Canada) Ltd., participated in the preparation of the technical report entitled Technical Report and Recommendations, 2013 Exploration Program, Payne Bay Property, Québec, Anglo American Exploration (Canada) Ltd.  Virginia Mines Inc. completed in March 2014 (the Report), concerning mineralized material in the Payne Bay property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings Item III  Description of the Business  3.5.4 Geological Setting; 3.5.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.5.6 Mineralization in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2014 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,


| |                                              |  | 
| | -------------------------------------------- |  | 
| | /S/
Jean-François Bélanger                   |  | 
| | Name:
Jean-François Bélanger B.Eng., Jr.Eng. |  | 

May 15, 2014
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing WorldWide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Marvin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

/S/ JAMES MARVIN
-----------------------
James Marvin
Chief Financial Officer
October 25, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA,
the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                      |  |                  
|--------------------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ RICHARD L. PETEKA
|Name:                 |  | Richard L. Peteka
|Date:                 |  | February 7, 2007