41714 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2022 / Notices 

and its subcontractors and consultants 

have completed their work. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.; 21 

U.S.C. 301 et seq. 

Dated: July 5, 2022. 

Delores Barber, 

Director, Information Technology and 

Resources Management Division, Office of 

Program Support. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14937 Filed 7–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0750; FRL–9968–01– 

OCSPP] 

Pesticide Registration Review; 

Proposed Interim Decisions for Several 

Pesticides; Notice of Availability 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

availability of EPA’s proposed interim 

registration review decisions and opens 

a 60-day public comment period on the 

proposed interim decisions for the 

following pesticides: 2-methyl-1- 

butanol, Calcium Acetate, Candida 

Oleophila, Cedarwood Oil, 

Chlorflurenol Methyl Ester (CME), 

Citral, Heptyl butyrate, L-Carvone, 

Sedaxane, Tebuconazole, Triadimefon 

and Triadimenol. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before September 12, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by the docket identification 

(ID) number for the specific pesticide of 

interest provided in Table 1 in Unit IV., 

through the Federal eRulemaking Portal 

at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow 

the online instructions for submitting 

comments. Do not submit electronically 

any information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Additional 

instructions on commenting and visiting 

the docket, along with more information 

about dockets generally, is available at 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For pesticide specific information, 

contact: The Chemical Review Manager 

for the pesticide of interest identified in 

Table 1 in Unit IV. 

For general information on the 

registration review program, contact: 

Melanie Biscoe, Pesticide Re-Evaluation 

Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; email 

address: biscoe.melanie@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

This action is directed to the public 

in general and may be of interest to a 

wide range of stakeholders including 

environmental, human health, farm 

worker, and agricultural advocates; the 

chemical industry; pesticide users; and 

members of the public interested in the 

sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. 

Since others also may be interested, the 

Agency has not attempted to describe all 

the specific entities that may be affected 

by this action. If you have any questions 

regarding the applicability of this action 

to a particular entity, consult the 

Chemical Review Manager for the 

pesticide of interest identified in Table 

1 in Unit IV. 

B. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through 

regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark 

the part or all of the information that 

you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information on a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for preparing your comments. 

When preparing and submitting your 

comments, see the commenting tips at: 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ 

commenting-epa-dockets. 

3. Environmental justice. EPA seeks to 

achieve environmental justice, the fair 

treatment and meaningful involvement 

of any group, including minority and/or 

low-income populations, in the 

development, implementation, and 

enforcement of environmental laws, 

regulations, and policies. To help 

address potential environmental justice 

issues, the Agency seeks information on 

any groups or segments of the 

population who, as a result of their 

location, cultural practices, or other 

factors, may have atypical or 

disproportionately high and adverse 

human health impacts or environmental 

effects from exposure to the pesticides 

discussed in this document, compared 

to the general population. 

II. Background 

Registration review is EPA’s periodic 

review of pesticide registrations to 

ensure that each pesticide continues to 

satisfy the statutory standard for 

registration, that is, the pesticide can 

perform its intended function without 

unreasonable adverse effects on human 

health or the environment. As part of 

the registration review process, the 

Agency has completed proposed interim 

decisions for all pesticides listed in 

Table 1 in Unit IV. Through this 

program, EPA is ensuring that each 

pesticide’s registration is based on 

current scientific and other knowledge, 

including its effects on human health 

and the environment. 

III. Authority 

EPA is conducting its registration 

review of the chemicals listed in the 

Table 1 in Unit IV. pursuant to section 

3(g) of the Federal Insecticide, 

Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) 

and the Procedural Regulations for 

Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, 

subpart C. FIFRA section 3(g) provides, 

among other things, that the 

registrations of pesticides are to be 

reviewed every 15 years. Under FIFRA, 

a pesticide product may be registered or 

remain registered only if it meets the 

statutory standard for registration given 

in FIFRA section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 

136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance 

with widespread and commonly 

recognized practice, the pesticide 

product must perform its intended 

function without unreasonable adverse 

effects on the environment; that is, 

without any unreasonable risk to man or 

the environment, or a human dietary 

risk from residues that result from the 

use of a pesticide in or on food. 

IV. What action is the Agency taking? 

Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice 

announces the availability of EPA’s 

proposed interim registration review 

decisions for the pesticides shown in 

Table 1 and opens a 60-day public 

comment period on the proposed 

interim registration review decisions. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2022 / Notices 41715 

TABLE 1—PROPOSED INTERIM DECISIONS

Registration review case name and No. Docket ID No. Chemical review manager and contact information 

2-methyl-1-butanol, Case Number 6308 .......................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0303 Jennifer Odom, odom.jennifer@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1536. 

Calcium Acetate, Case Number 6341 ............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0304 Jennifer Odom, odom.jennifer@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1536. 

Candida oleophila, Case Number 6019 ........................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0445 Hannah Dean, dean.hannah@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1531. 

Cedarwood Oil, Case Number 3150 ................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0108 Jennifer Odom, odom.jennifer@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1536. 

Chlorflurenol Methyl Ester (CME), Case Number 2095 .. EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0037 Quinn Gavin, gavin.quinn@epa.gov, (202) 566–2284. 

Citral, Case Number 6314 ............................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0301 Susanne Cerrelli, cerrelli.susanne@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1516. 

Heptyl butyrate, Case Number 6305 ............................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0402 Hannah Dean, dean.hannah@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1531. 

L-Carvone, Case Number 6306 ....................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0392 Susanne Cerrelli, cerrelli.susanne@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1516. 

Sedaxane, Case Number 7065 ........................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0448 Christian Bongard, bongard.christian@epa.gov, (202) 

566–2248. 

Tebuconazole, Case Number 7004 ................................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0378 Tiffany Green, green.tiffany@epa.gov, (202) 566–2224. 

Triadimefon and Triadimenol, Case Numbers 2700 and 

7008.

EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0114 Matthew B. Khan, khan.matthew@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

2212. 

The registration review docket for a 

pesticide includes earlier documents 

related to the registration review case. 

For example, the review opened with a 

Preliminary Work Plan, for public 

comment. A Final Work Plan was 

placed in the docket following public 

comment on the Preliminary Work Plan. 

The documents in the dockets 

describe EPA’s rationales for conducting 

additional risk assessments for the 

registration review of the pesticides 

included in Table 1 in Unit IV., as well 

as the Agency’s subsequent risk findings 

and consideration of possible risk 

mitigation measures. These proposed 

interim registration review decisions are 

supported by the rationales included in 

those documents. Following public 

comment, the Agency will issue interim 

or final registration review decisions for 

the pesticides listed in Table 1 in Unit 

IV. 

The registration review final rule at 40 

CFR 155.58(a) provides for a minimum 

60-day public comment period on all 

proposed interim registration review 

decisions. This comment period is 

intended to provide an opportunity for 

public input and a mechanism for 

initiating any necessary amendments to 

the proposed interim decision. All 

comments should be submitted using 

the methods in ADDRESSES and must be 

received by EPA on or before the closing 

date. These comments will become part 

of the docket for the pesticides included 

in the Tables in Unit IV. Comments 

received after the close of the comment 

period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not 

required to consider these late 

comments. 

The Agency will carefully consider all 

comments received by the closing date 

and may provide a ‘‘Response to 

Comments Memorandum’’ in the 

docket. The interim registration review 

decision will explain the effect that any 

comments had on the interim decision 

and provide the Agency’s response to 

significant comments. 

Background on the registration review 

program is provided at: https://

www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: July 6, 2022. 

Mary Reaves, 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14871 Filed 7–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[Petition IV–2021–5; FRL–9978–01–R4] 

Clean Air Act Operating Permit 

Program; Petition for Objection to 

State Operating Permit for Alabama 

Power Company—Barry Generating 

Plant (Mobile County, Alabama) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of final Order on petition 

to object to state operating permit. 

SUMMARY: The EPA Administrator 

signed an Order, dated June 14, 2022, 

granting in part and denying in part the 

petition submitted by Sierra Club and 

Greater-Birmingham Alliance to Stop 

Pollution (Petitioners) objecting to a 

proposed Clean Air Act (CAA) title V 

operating permit issued to Alabama 

Power Company for its Barry Generating 

Plant located in Mobile County, 

Alabama. The Order responds to a 

March 30, 2021, petition requesting that 

EPA object to the final operating permit 

number 503–1001. The title V operating 

permit was issued by the Alabama 

Department of Environmental 

Management (ADEM). The Order 

constitutes a final action on the petition 

addressed therein. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the Order, the 

petition, and all pertinent information 

relating thereto are on file at the 

following location: EPA Region 4; Air 

and Radiation Division; 61 Forsyth 

Street SW; Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

The Order and petition are also 

available electronically at the following 

addresses: https://www.epa.gov/system/ 

files/documents/2022-06/ 

APC%20Barry%20Order_6-14-22.pdf; 

https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operatingpermits/title-v-petition-database. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Art 

Hofmeister, Air Permits Section, EPA 

Region 4, at (404) 562–9115 or 

hofmeister.art@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA 

affords EPA a 45-day period to review 

and, as appropriate, the authority to 

object to operating permits proposed by 

state permitting authorities under title V 

of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7661–7661f. 

Section 505(b)(2) of the CAA and 40 

CFR 70.8(d) authorize any person to 

petition the EPA Administrator to object 

to a title V operating permit within 60 

days after the expiration of EPA’s 45- 

day review period if EPA has not 

objected on its own initiative. Petitions 

must be based only on objections to the 

permit that were raised with reasonable 

specificity during the public comment 

period provided by the state, unless the 

petitioner demonstrates that it was 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1