alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Stratum Holdings, Inc. (the “registrant”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, LarryM. Wright, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of this Sarbanes Oxley Actof 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and ExchangeAct of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the registrant.

 

 
|   | /s/    | Larry  M. Wright         |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |   | Larry  M. Wright         |
|   |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |   | November 10,  2008  |

 

----
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40046 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
TORIBIO ENCINIO

- MORENO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:09

- CR

- 1128

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Toribio Encinio

Moreno has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Encinio

- Moreno h a s not file d a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 18, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40046 Document: 00513723553 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016No. 16

- 40046

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40046 Document: 00513723553 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 539 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and extend the 

energy efficient commercial buildings deduction. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2007 

Ms. SCHWARTZ (for herself and Mr. BAIRD) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

and extend the energy efficient commercial buildings deduction. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Buildings for the 21st 

5 Century Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE AND EXTENSION OF ENERGY EFFICIENT 

7 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS DEDUCTION. 

8 (a) INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF DEDUCTION.—Section 

9 179D of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HR 539 IH

1 energy efficient commercial buildings deduction) is amend2 ed— 

3 (1) in subsection (b)(1)(A) by striking ‘‘$1.80’’ 

4 and inserting ‘‘$2.25’’, and 

5 (2) in subsection (d)(1)(A) by striking ‘‘$.60 

6 for $1.80’’ and inserting ‘‘$.75 for $2.25’’. 

7 (b) EXTENSION.—Subsection (h) of section 179D of 

8 such Code (relating to termination) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘December 31, 2008’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 

10 2013’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to property placed in service in 

13 taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer**I, Brian Fontana, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of INX Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 24, 2006 By  /s/ BRIAN FONTANA   Brian Fontana, Vice President   and Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 29, 2013

s0422

Order 

April 29, 2013

146909 & (23)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 146909

COA: 311060

Wayne CC: 90-001794-FC

MARCAEL MARIO DIXON, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the March 7, 2012 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion for relief from judgment 

is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G).
##### 



EXHIBIT (31.1)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a/15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238 and 33-8760 and Rule
14d-14(a) under the Exchange Act];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ ELMER DOTYElmer DotyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-19-00297-CV

NO. 09-19-00321-CV

__________________

BROCK HOLDINGS III, LLC AND CUSTOM BLAST SERVICES INC., 

Appellants

V.

PARTNER INDUSTRIAL COATINGS, LP, PARTNER INDUSTRIAL, LP, 

AND TODD BROCK, Appellees

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 60th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-203,903

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 27, 2020, appellees filed an unopposed motion to abate these 

accelerated appeals to permit the parties to complete settlement negotiations, and on 

February 6, 2020, this Court entered an order abating these appeals. On February 18, 

2020, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss these accelerated appeals in 

accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.
2

We reinstate the appeals, grant the parties’ joint motion, and dismiss these 

accelerated appeals in accordance with the parties’ settlement agreement.

APPEALS DISMISSED.

 PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 2, 2020

Opinion Delivered March 5, 2020

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**  **AND**  **CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT
      OF 2002**






I,
      Philip
      J. Young, President and Chief Executive Officer of Osteologix, Inc., certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
      Osteologix, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of Osteologix, Inc.




November
      14, 2007




By:
            /S/
                Philip J. YoungPhilip
                J. YoungPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer






I,
      Matthew M. Loar, Chief Financial Officer of Osteologix, Inc., certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Osteologix, Inc. for the
      quarter ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Osteologix, Inc.




November
      14, 2007




By:
            /S/
                Matthew M. LoarMatthew
                M. LoarChief
                Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ending June 30,2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antonio
F. Uccello, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 31, 2005

/s/ Antonio F. Uccello, III
Antonio F. Uccello, III
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ending June 30,2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antonio
F. Uccello, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 31, 2005

/s/ Antonio F. Uccello, III
Antonio F. Uccello, III
Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Department of Environmental :

Protection, :

Petitioner :

 :

v. : No. 291 C.D. 2020

 : 

B&R Resources, LLC and :

Richard F. Campola, :

Respondents :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, January 31, 2022, the “Application in to Report an Unreported 

Memorandum Opinion of the Court,” filed by the Department of Environmental 

Protection, to which no response was filed, is GRANTED. The above-captioned 

Memorandum Opinion, filed December 6, 2021, shall be designated OPINION and 

shall be REPORTED.
# L_2012344EN.01000301.xml

| 14.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 344/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 344/3

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 201 of 27 July 2012
  )

Page 134, Article 84, second paragraph:

for:

‘... except for Articles 77 and 78, which shall apply from 16 January 2014 ...’,

read:

‘... except for Articles 77 and 78, which shall apply from 16 November 2014 ...’.

---
STATE v. TERRY.

No. COA05-646.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Caswell (03CRS51131, 03CRS51132)

Case without published opinion. Dismissed in part; affirmed in part.
STATE v. CUMMINGS.

No. COA05-1063.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 2, 2006.

Certification Date May 22, 2006.

Appeal from Columbus (04CRS51726).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
In re J.W., K.W.

No. 592A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 18, 2005.

Peter Wood, for Mother (Artemisia W.)

Elizabeth Boone, for Guardian Ad Litem.

Jesse Jones, for Robert Winder.

Carlene Edwards, for Jason Wiggins.

*547The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of November 2005 by Petitioner (Harnett County DSS) for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Petitioner (Harnett County DSS) shall have up to and including the 29th day of December 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 18th day of November 2005."
STATE v. HARLEY.

No. COA05-575.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Rockingham (04CRS3010).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
# L_2012178EN.01000601.xml

| 10.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 178/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 178/6

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 613/2012

of 9 July 2012

amending Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing common rules concerning the conditions to be complied with to pursue the occupation of road transport operator and repealing Council Directive 96/26/EC (1), and in particular Article 8(9) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The colour of the model certificate of professional competence is defined in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 as ‘Colour Pantone stout fawn’. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The colour of the model certificate of professional competence is defined in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009 as ‘Colour Pantone stout fawn’.

| (2) | There is a need to specify the colour more precisely in order to encourage homogeneity and uniform interpretation and application of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

There is a need to specify the colour more precisely in order to encourage homogeneity and uniform interpretation and application of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1071/2009, in the third line, the sentence ‘Colour Pantone stout fawn, format DIN A4 cellulose paper 100 g/m2 or more’ is replaced by the following:

‘Colour Pantone stout fawn 467, or as close as possible to this colour, format DIN A4 cellulose paper 100 g/m2 or more’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2012.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 51.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6974
MARK STEVEN FORTIER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PAUL ATENCIO, Agent for the South Carolina Law Enforcement Division, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-93-2519-2-18AJ) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mark Steven Fortier, Appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Elizabeth Newell Keenan, ELLIS, LAWHORNE, DAVIDSON & SIMS, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advisedAppellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED