alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF RIDGEVIEW, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Name                                           Jurisdiction of Incorporation
      ----                                           -----------------------------

<S>                                                  <C> 
Ridgeview Ltd.                                       Cayman Island

Seneca Knitting Mills Corporation                    New York

GPM Corporation                                      New York

Seneca Knitting Mills, International                 United States Virgin Islands
Sales, Inc.

A Child's View, Inc.                                 North Carolina

Ridgeview Foundation, Inc.                           North Carolina

Tri-Star Hosiery Mills, Inc.                         North Carolina
</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 915 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5477 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JULY 30, 2008 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 120 South Del Mar Avenue in San Gabriel, 

California, as the ‘‘Chi Mui Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHI MUI POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 120 South Del Mar Avenue in 

6 San Gabriel, California, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Chi Mui Post Office Building’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5477 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chi Mui Post Office 

5 Building’’. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Calendar No. 915 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5477 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. in San Gabriel, California, as the ‘‘Chi Mui Post al Service located at 120 South Del Mar Avenue 

JULY 30, 2008 

Reported without amendment 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
**Exhibit 12.3**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

 

We consent to our report dated March 31, 2002 (except for the restatement to constant pesos as of December 31, 2002, as to which the date is June 27,2003), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 of Occidente y Caribe Celular S.A. (the “Company”) and to the incorporation by reference of such report in the Company’s Registration Statement onForm F-3 (333-08508). 

 

/s/    DELOITTE &TOUCHE LTDA. 

----
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
        PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
        on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the
        Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonio
        F. Uccello, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002,
        that:
 
 1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: May
        21, 2007
 
 /s/
        Antonio F. Uccello, III
 Antonio
        F. Uccello, III
 Chief
        Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5376 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5376

         To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Thymol.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Thymol.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THYMOL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.43 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Thymol) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            8910
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    26535
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (460)
<INVENTORY>                                       4144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 43257
<PP&E>                                           25841
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (13195)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   76176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            25108
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            50
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       49402
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     76176
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 96464
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    76354
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   248
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1698
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1073
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       625
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
STATE v. WATSON

No. COA05-144

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS56808, 03CRS61917).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
10-Q Exhibit 32.1: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of
iShares COMEX Gold Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Blake Grossman, Chief Executive Officer of Barclays
Global Investors, N.A., the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.



Date: August 9, 2005



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/    BLAKE GROSSMAN        
|Blake Grossman *             
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Grossman is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors, N.A., the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GORDON v. STATE.

No. 636P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael K. Lands, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of December 2004 by Plaintiff to "Request Certification of Cause to Be Transferred to the Supreme Court for Review":

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
IN RE B.H.

No. COA05-1271.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Durham (02J203)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Tenth Circuit

Byron White United States Courthouse

1823 Stout Street

Denver, Colorado 80294

(303) 844-3157

Patrick J. Fisher, Jr. Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk Chief Deputy Clerk

November 8, 1996

TO: All recipients of the captioned order and judgment

RE: 96-1072 Lyons v. Claar

October 21, 1996 

Please be advised of the following correction to the captioned decision:

Inadvertently, the hard copy of the order and judgment was stamped with the

incorrect filed date (October 22, 1996). The correct filed date is October 21, 1996.

Please make the appropriate correction.

Very truly yours,

Patrick Fisher, Clerk

Susan Tidwell

Deputy Clerk
No. 96-1072, Lyons v. Claar

Attachment not available electronically.
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 10/21/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH C. LYONS

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NARD CLAAR; JOSE VEGA;

BECKY ROMANO; JERRY

KIMBREL,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-1072

(D.C. No. 95-S-2785)

(D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BRORBY, EBEL and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.
-2-

Mr. Lyons is a pro se litigant and a state inmate. The trial court dismissed

Mr. Lyons' complaint as frivolous and Mr. Lyons appeals.

Mr. Lyons sued four prison officials alleging they transfered him from a

higher paying prison job to a lower paying prison job. He asked for restoration of

his previous job, back pay and bonuses, and an injunction to prevent any

retaliation.

The district court, in a well reasoned opinion, concluded the claims should

be dismissed as frivolous.

Mr. Lyons appeals this decision. Mr. Lyons' brief is not persuasive and is

based upon a misunderstanding of the law. The basic premise of Mr. Lyons' brief

is that somehow he has a constitutional right to his former job. This simply is not

the case.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for substantially the

same reasons set forth in the order of the district court, a copy of which is

attached.

Entered for the Court

WADE BRORBY

United States Circuit Judge
STATE v. CLARK.

No. COA05-1407.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Cherokee (03CRS51800, 03CRS51802).

Case without published opinion. No error.
IN RE A.K.

No. COA04-986-2.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 1, 2006.

Certification Date August 21, 2006.

Appeal from Buncombe (02J33(B)).

Case without published opinion. Reversed.
STATE v. Kevin Lamont LEAK.

No. 664P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Richard E. Jester, for Kevin Lamont Leak.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of December 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion for Stay Dissolved by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of April 2006."
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
JUNE 30, 2004 (the "Report") of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the
"Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                            /s/    Michael S. Gross
                           ---------------------------------
                           Name: Michael S. Gross
                           Date: August 11, 2004


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Apollo Investment Corporation and
will be retained by Apollo Investment Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our reports dated February 27, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedule included in the Annual Report of INX Inc. (formerly I-Sector Corporation)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference of said reports in the Registration Statements of INX Inc. (formerly I-SectorCorporation) on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-41001, effective November 25, 1997 and File No. 333-60320,effective May 7, 2002)./s/ GRANT THORNTON LLPHouston, Texas
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gregory A.Wells, Chief Financial Officer of NTS Realty Capital, Inc., the managinggeneral partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

1.                                       TheQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 10, 2007
| */s/ Gregory A. Wells*                                                                                                        | * * | * * |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------|----------|
| Chief Financial Officer of NTS Realty Capital, Inc.,  the Managing General Partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership |     |     |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5591 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow nontaxable employer 

matching contributions to section 529 college savings plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2008 

Mr. PITTS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow nontaxable employer matching contributions to section 529 

college savings plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Help Kids Save for 

5 College Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NONTAXABLE EMPLOYER MATCHING CONTRIBU7 TIONS TO SECTION 529 COLLEGE SAVINGS 

8 PLANS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap10 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5591 IH

1 items specifically excluded from gross income) is amended 

2 by inserting after section 139B the following new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 139C. EMPLOYER MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS TO 

4 SECTION 529 COLLEGE SAVINGS PLANS. 

5 ‘‘(a) EXCLUSION.—Gross income of an employee does 

6 not include amounts paid during the taxable year by the 

7 employer to a qualified tuition program for the benefit of 

8 a designated beneficiary if such amounts are paid pursu9 ant to a college savings assistance program. 

10 ‘‘(b) LIMITATION.—The amount excluded from the 

11 gross income of an employee under subsection (a) for any 

12 taxable year with respect to each designated beneficiary 

13 shall not exceed the lesser of— 

14 ‘‘(1) $500, or 

15 ‘‘(2) the amount paid by the employee during 

16 such year to such program for the benefit of such 

17 beneficiary. 

18 ‘‘(c) COLLEGE SAVINGS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.— 

19 For purposes of this section, a college savings assistance 

20 program is a separate written plan of an employer for the 

21 exclusive benefit of such employer’s employees— 

22 ‘‘(1) under which the employer makes payments 

23 to qualfied tuition programs for the benefit of des24 ignated beneficiaries, and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5591 IH

1 ‘‘(2) which meets requirements similar to the 

2 requirements of paragraphs (2), (3), (5), and (6) of 

3 section 127(b). 

4 ‘‘(d) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section, 

5 terms used is this section which are also used in section 

6 529 shall have the respective meanings given such terms 

7 by section 529.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 for such part III is amended by inserting after the item 

10 relating to section 139B the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 139C. Employer matching contributions to section 529 college savings 

plans.’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1 CEO CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing Worldwide,
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Pinkerton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Charles Pinkerton   | 
| | ----------------------- | 
| | Charles Pinkerton       | 
| | Chief Executive Officer | 
| | February 21, 2012       |
Superior Court

of the

State of Delaware

Jan R. Jurden Leonard L. Williams Justice Center

President Judge 500 North King Street, Suite 10400

Wilmington, Delaware 19801-3733

Telephone (302) 255-0654

Date Submitted: May 2, 2022

Date Decided: July 21, 2022

Richard Davis

SBI #00096128

JTVCC

181 Paddock Road

Smyrna, DE 19977

RE: State of Delaware v. Richard Davis ID No. 85002087DI

Dear Mr. Davis:

The Court is in receipt of your “Motion for Redress of Postconviction Review 

Under Superior Court Civil Rules of Procedure, Rules 59(e) and 60(b)(3)” dated 

April 26, 2022, and filed filed on May 2, 2022.

1

 In your latest motion, you reargue

the same “conflict of interest” argument raised in your second motion for 

postconviction relief.2

Motions for reargument are governed by Superior Court Rule of Civil 

Procedure 59(e). Rule 59(e) states “[a] motion for reargument shall be served and 

filed within 5 days after the filing of the Court’s opinion or decision.”3 Here, the 

Court issued its Order summarily dismissing your second motion for postconviction 

1 D.I. 58. Based on Defendant’s reference to Superior Court Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), the 

Court construes this as a motion for reargument.

2 D.I. 55. Defendant’s second motion for postconviction relief was summarily dismissed by the

Court as untimely and procedurally barred. See D.I. 57.

3 Super. Ct. Civ. R. 59(e) (emphasis added).
relief on April 13, 2022.4

 Your motion was not filed until May 2, 2022. Your motion 

for reargument is DENIED as untimely.5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Jan R. Jurden

Jan R. Jurden

President Judge

JRJ:mls

cc: Prothonotary

Joseph S. Grubb, DAG

4 D.I. 57.

5

See Webb v. State, 911 A.2d 804 (Table) (Del. 2006) (affirming the Superior Court’s denial of 

defendant’s motion for reargument because it was not filed until nearly three weeks after the 

Superior Court denied defendant’s motion for postconviction relief).
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-7031 CHARLES E. BLACKWELL, Claimant-Appellant,

v. R. JAMES NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee. ON MOTION Before RADER, Circuit Judge

. O R D E R Charles E. Blackwell move s without opposition to stay proceedings in this appeal pending the court’s disposition of Harms v. Nicholson , 2007-7005. Blackwell asserts that both this case and Harms involve the issue of whether an appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims from a denial of a motion to vacate is timely if filed within 120 days of the date of the decision denying the motion. We conclude that a stay is warranted and authorize the cler k of the court to grant similar unopposed motions. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:(1) The motion to stay is granted. Blackwell is directed to inform this court within 14 days of the c ourt’s disposition of Harms how he believes this appeal should proceed. The Secretary of Veterans A ffairs may also respond within that time. (2) A copy of this order shall be tr ansmitted to the merits panel assigned to hear Harms

. (3) The clerk of the court is authoriz ed to grant similar unopposed motions in the future.

February 15, 2007 /s/ Randall R. Rader Date Randall R. Rader Circuit Judge cc: Kenneth M. Carpenter, Esq. Claudia Burke, Esq.
s17

2007-7031 2