alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PATRONELLI v. PATRONELLI.

No. 55A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 22, 2006.

Michael S. Harrell, Raleigh, for Carrie Patronelli.

John M. Oliver, for Donald Patronelli.

Celia Pistolis, Raleigh, for Legal Aid of NC.

William D. Rowe, for N.C. Justice Center.

Kenneth L. Schorr, Charlotte, for LSSP.

Andrea Kurtz, for LAS.

Christine O. Trottier, for CLA.

Stella A. Boswell, for NCAWA.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of February 2006 by NC Bar Association for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of February 2006."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5269 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow additional expenses 

for purposes of determining the Hope Scholarship Credit, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. BRADY of Texas (for himself and Mr. HINOJOSA) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow additional expenses for purposes of determining the Hope 

Scholarship Credit, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF HOPE SCHOLARSHIP CRED4 IT. 

5 (a) ALLOWANCE OF ADDITIONAL EXPENSES.—Para6 graph (1) of section 25A(f) of the Internal Revenue Code 

7 of 1986 (defining qualified tuition and related expenses) 

8 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph: 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5269 IH

1 ‘‘(D) ADDITIONAL EXPENSES ALLOWED

2 FOR HOPE SCHOLARSHIP CREDIT.—For pur3 poses of the Hope Scholarship Credit, such 

4 term shall include— 

5 ‘‘(i) costs incurred for room and board 

6 that are not in excess of the limitation im7 posed under section 529(e)(3)(B)(ii), 

8 ‘‘(ii) at the election of the taxpayer, 

9 expenses which would be employment-re10 lated expenses (as defined in section 21(b)) 

11 if attendance at an eligible educational in12 stitution were treated as employment, and 

13 ‘‘(iii) books, supplies, and equipment 

14 required for courses of instruction at the 

15 eligible educational institution. 

16 No credit shall be allowed to the taxpayer under 

17 section 21 for the taxable year if the taxpayer 

18 elects the application of clause (ii) for such tax19 able year.’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 this section shall apply to expenses paid after December 

22 31, 2007 (in taxable years ending after such date), for 

23 education furnished in academic periods beginning after 

24 such date. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 6.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report on Form 40-F of Virginia Mines Inc. for the year ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.   Date:  May19, 2011   /s/ Robin Villeneuve Robin Villeneuve Chief Financial Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2015065DE.01002202.xml

| 10.3.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 65/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.3.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 65/22

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 545/2012 des Rates vom 25. Juni 2012 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 36/2012 über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der Lage in Syrien

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 165 vom 26. Juni 2012
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 165 vom 26. Juni 2012

Auf Seite 23, Artikel 1 Nummer 1, neuer Artikel 3 Absatz 1 Buchstaben a und b:

anstatt:

„(1)   Es ist verboten,

| a) | für syrische Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen oder zur Verwendung in Syrien unmittelbar oder mittelbar technische Hilfe im Zusammenhang mit den ...; |
| --- | --- |

a)

für syrische Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen oder zur Verwendung in Syrien unmittelbar oder mittelbar technische Hilfe im Zusammenhang mit den ...;

| b) | für syrische Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen oder zur Verwendung in Syrien unmittelbar oder mittelbar technische Hilfe oder Vermittlungsdienste im Zusammenhang mit den ...;“ |
| --- | --- |

b)

für syrische Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen oder zur Verwendung in Syrien unmittelbar oder mittelbar technische Hilfe oder Vermittlungsdienste im Zusammenhang mit den ...;“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   Es ist verboten,

| a) | für Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen in Syrien oder zur Verwendung in Syrien unmittelbar oder mittelbar technische Hilfe im Zusammenhang mit den ...; |
| --- | --- |

a)

für Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen in Syrien oder zur Verwendung in Syrien unmittelbar oder mittelbar technische Hilfe im Zusammenhang mit den ...;

| b) | für Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen in Syrien oder zur Verwendung in Syrien unmittelbar oder mittelbar technische Hilfe oder Vermittlungsdienste im Zusammenhang mit den ...;“ |
| --- | --- |

b)

für Personen, Organisationen oder Einrichtungen in Syrien oder zur Verwendung in Syrien unmittelbar oder mittelbar technische Hilfe oder Vermittlungsdienste im Zusammenhang mit den ...;“

.

---
STATE v. SHARPE.

No. COA05-1273.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. No error.
D'AQULSTO v. HEALTH SYSTEM.

No. 415PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Thomas F. Ramer, for Caroline D'Aquisto.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of November 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Mission St. Joseph's Health System) shall have up to and including the 22nd day of November 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of November 2005."
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000637

07-OCT-2019

09:09 AM
EXHIBIT 11

MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
(in thousands, except per share data)

|                                                              |  | Quarter Ended
December 31, 2001 |       | Year Ended
December 31, 2001
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ----- | ----------------------------
|Net income (loss)                                             |  | $                               | 1,547 |                             
|Weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock |  |                                 | 8,494 |                             
|Basic earnings (loss) per share                               |  | $                               | 0.18  |                             
|                                                              |  |                                 |       |                             
|Net income (loss)                                             |  | $                               | 1,547 |                             
|Weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock |  |                                 | 8,494 |                             
|Dilutive stock options                                        |  |                                 | 9     |                             
|                                                              |  |                                 |       |                             
|                                                              |  |                                 | 8,503 |                             
|Earnings (loss) per share assuming dilution                   |  | $                               | 0.18  |                             
|                                                              |  |                                 |       |                             

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Stanley, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 201]

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Timothy J. Drury, J.), rendered May 27, 2003. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed *(see People v Hidalgo,*91 NY2d 733, 737 [1998]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5492 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5492

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
   construct a greenhouse facility at its museum support facility in 
              Suitland, Maryland, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION OF GREENHOUSE FACILITY.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to construct a greenhouse facility at its museum support facility in 
Suitland, Maryland, to maintain the horticultural operations of, and 
preserve the orchid collection held in trust by, the Smithsonian 
Institution.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated $12,000,000 to carry out 
this Act. Such sums shall remain available until expended.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 11, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5492

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
   construct a greenhouse facility at its museum support facility in 
              Suitland, Maryland, and for other purposes.
```
POWER OF ATTORNEY

       KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,  that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints each of Christie S.  Flanagan,  Renee Nichols  Tucei,  and James R.
Eller,   Jr.  or  any  of  them,   each  acting  alone,   his  true  and  lawful
attorney-in-fact  and agent,  with full power of substitution for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities,  in connection with the GOLDEN
STATE BANCORP INC. (the  "Corporation")  Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended  December 31, 2001 under the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
including,  without  limiting the generality of the foregoing,  to sign the Form
10-K  in the  name  and  on  behalf  of  the  Corporation  or on  behalf  of the
undersigned as a director or officer of the  Corporation,  and any amendments to
the Form 10-K and any instrument,  contract, document or other writing, of or in
connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto,  and to file the same, with
all exhibits  thereto,  and other documents in connection  therewith,  including
this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,  the Office
of  Thrift  Supervision,  or  other  appropriate  regulatory  authority  and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto
said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority
to do and perform  each and every act and thing  requisite  and  necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might
or  could  do  in  person,   hereby  ratifying  and  confirming  all  that  said
attorney-in-fact   and  agents,   each  acting  alone,   or  his  substitute  or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

       IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned has signed these presents this 18th
                                                                            ----
day of March 2002.


                                                      /s/ John A. Moran
                                                --------------------------------
                                                          John A. Moran
STATE v. LOCKLEAR

No. COA05-479

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Robeson (00CRS644, 00CRS645, 00CRS646, 00CRS647).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
TENNESSEE 

ηϯϭ

Ψρ͘ϭ^WEd/E

STATE 

ηϯΘ

ϭ͘ϯйK&^dd'W

Ϭ͘εй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

Ψϳκρ

PER RESIDENT 

ηϮς

Ψκ͘ϬKEdZd

SPENDING 

ηϮΘ

Ϯς͕εϯΘEhDZK&

PERSONNEL 

#33 

Ψϭ͘ϭWZ^KEE>

SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ κй

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐĂŶĚ ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ϭςй ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ϭй

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ ϳεй

By Service 

Army 

63% 

Navy/Marines 

9% 

Air Force 

18% 

Other Defense 

9% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Active ƵƚLJ͗Θй

Reserve: 20% 

Civilian: 24% 

National 

Guard: 48% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

62% 

Navy/Marines 

19% 

Air Force 

18% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ŽŶƐŽůŝĚĂƚĞĚEƵĐůĞĂƌ^ĞĐƵƌŝƚLJ ΨϮ͘ϭ

&ĞĚdž ΨκεϬ͘ΘD

^LJƐƚĞŵƐ Ψκϭϭ͘κD

ĞĐŚƚĞů'ƌŽƵƉ ΨϮκϮ͘ϮD

/ŶƚĞŐƌĂƟŽŶ/ŶŶŽǀĂƟŽŶ/ŶĐ͘ Ψκϯ͘εD

>ϯdĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐ ΨκϮ͘κD

KD Ψϯε͘ρD

dĞǀĞƚ ΨϮΘ͘ϯD

/ĞĨĞŶƐĞ'ƌŽƵƉ ΨϮκ͘εD

ƵŵŵŝŶƐ ΨϮϮ͘κD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψκ͘Ϭ

ΨϮ͘Ϭ Ψϭ͘ϳ Ψϭ͘ρ Ψϭ͘κ

&zϭς &zϭϳ

Ψϭ͘ς

&zϭϮ

Ψϭ͘Ϯ Ψϭ͘ϯ

&zϭϯ &zϭκ &zϭρ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Ψϭ͘ϭ/>>/KE Ϯς͕εϯΘ

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

ŽƵŶƚLJ ĐƟǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

^ŚĞůďLJ ϭ͕κϯϭ Ϯ͕κρΘ ϭ͕ϯϳϬ ϭ͕κεϮ ς͕ϳρϭ

ĂǀŝĚƐŽŶ κϭς ϭ͕ϭκϮ Ϯ͕κρϭ ϭ͕ϯρρ ρ͕ϯςκ

ůŽƵŶƚ Ϯκ Θϭ ϭ͕ςϭΘ E E

<ŶŽdž Θε κϭρ ϮϬϭ ΘϬϮ ϭ͕ρϬϳ

ZƵƚŚĞƌĨŽƌĚ ϯς ϭϭϳ ΘΘς κςϬ ϭ͕κεε

,ĂŵŝůƚŽŶ ρϬ Θς κϯϯ ΘϬϳ ϭ͕ϯϳς

DŽŶƚŐŽŵĞƌLJ κϳ ϭ͕ϭϭς ϳϯ E E

ŽīĞĞ ρκ κϭϬ Ϯρϭ E E

tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ κκ ϯκ ϳΘ ϮΘϭ κϯϳ

'ŝďƐŽŶ Ϭ ϯς ϯϳϮ Ϭ κϬΘ

ϭϬϮ KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I

TENNESSEE S CAL YEAR 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

'ŝďƐŽŶ <ŶŽdž

ZƵƚŚĞƌĨŽƌĚ

ůŽƵŶƚ ŽĨĨĞĞ

^ŚĞůďLJ ,ĂŵŝůƚŽŶ

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

DŽŶƚŐŽŵĞƌLJ ^ƵůůŝǀĂŶ

'ƌĞĞŶĞ

ĂǀŝĚƐŽŶ

ŶĚĞƌƐŽŶ

<ŶŽdž

,ŝĐŬŵĂŶ

ŽĨĨĞĞ

^ŚĞůďLJ &ƌĂŶŬůŝŶ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ŶĚĞƌƐŽŶ

^ŚĞůďLJ

^ƵůůŝǀĂŶ

ŽīĞĞ

DŽŶƚŐŽŵĞƌLJ

ĂǀŝĚƐŽŶ

&ƌĂŶŬůŝŶ

,ŝĐŬŵĂŶ

'ƌĞĞŶĞ

<ŶŽdž

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ΨϮ͘ϭ

ΨςκΘ͘ϮD

$432.4 M 

Ψϯκρ͘ϮD

Ψεϯ͘ΘD

$74.2 M 

ΨκΘ͘ΘD

Ψκϭ͘εD

Ψϯε͘ϮD

ΨϯΘ͘κD

^ŚĞůďLJ

ĂǀŝĚƐŽŶ

DŽŶƚŐŽŵĞƌLJ

ůŽƵŶƚ

<ŶŽdž

ŽīĞĞ

ZƵƚŚĞƌĨŽƌĚ

,ĂŵŝůƚŽŶ

DĂĚŝƐŽŶ

'ŝďƐŽŶ

Ψϯϳϯ͘ϭD

ΨϮϮρ͘ΘD

$77.7 M 

ΨρϮ͘ΘD

Ψρϭ͘ρD

$42.3 M 

Ψϯς͘ϯD

ΨϯϬ͘ϬD

Ψϭϭ͘ϳD

ΨϭϬ͘ϮD

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

DŽŶƚŐŽŵĞƌLJ

ĂǀŝĚƐŽŶ

DĂĚŝƐŽŶ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε ϭϬϯ
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-21114

Conference Calendar

 

JOE HENRY MACK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DR. B.M. VINCENT; F.E. FIGUEROA; M. BROCK;

L. ARNOLD; DR. KOVACS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-98-CV-2548

- - - - - - - - - -

August 23, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Joe Henry Mack, Texas prisoner # 671331, appeals the

district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of the

defendants in his civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo under

the same standards applied in the district court. Amburgey v.

Corhart Refractories Corp., 936 F.2d 805, 809 (5th Cir. 1991). 

Summary judgment is proper when, viewing the evidence in the

light most favorable to the nonmovant, “‘there is no genuine

issue as to any material fact and . . . the moving party is
No. 00-21114

- 2 -

entitled to judgment as a matter of law.’” Id. (quoting Fed.

R. Civ. P. 56(c)). 

Mack has failed to shown a genuine issue for trial that the

prison staff was deliberately indifferent to his medical

condition. See Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 847 (1994). 

Similarly, Mack has failed to show a genuine issue for trial that

prison officials subjected him to cruel and unusual punishment

because of his cell or work assignments. See Wilson v. Seiter,

501 U.S. 294, 303 (1991). The district court did not err in

granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants.

AFFIRMED.
STATE of North Carolina v. John "Pete" LOCKAMY.

No. 397P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

John "Pete" Lockamy, Pro Se.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th day of July 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the
Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                      |  |                  
|--------------------- |  | -----------------
|/s/ RICHARD L. PETEKA
|Name:                 |  | Richard L. Peteka
|Date:                 |  | November 6, 2006
In the Matter of T.R.P.

No. 629A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2005.

Robert W. Ewing, Winston-Salem, for Renee Browe.

Elizabeth Martinson, for Ronnie Parks.

Sherrie Hodges, Jefferson, for Guardian ad Litem.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of December 2005 by Petitioner (Wilkes County DSS) for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Petitioner (Wilkes County DSS) shall have up to and including the 27th day of December 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of December 2005."
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION

I,
Brian F. Lavin, President and Chief Executive Officer of NTS Realty Capital, Inc., the
managing general partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that

| | 1. | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30,
               2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section
               13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: August 15, 2005 /s/ Brian F. Lavin
Brian F. LavinPresident and Chief Executive Officer of
NTS Realty Capital, Inc., the Managing General Partner of
NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the Form****10-Q) of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (the “Company”), I, Joseph D. Borgerding, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,****hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (a) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | /s/ Joseph D. Borgerding | Date: November 16, 2009 |
|--------|--------------------------|-------------------------|

|   | Joseph D. Borgerding |
|--------|----------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|