alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002





I, Carmine Stella, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Beverage Corporation;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.           I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and I have:





a)           designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the registrant and its  subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)           presented in this annual report my conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and  procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.           I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:





a)           all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6.           I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date  of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date: April 13, 2010
By:
/s/ Carmine StellaCarmine StellaPrincipal Accounting Officer
HERRING v. FOOD LION.

No. 28A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 15, 2006.

Gregory E. Floyd, for James C. Herring.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of March 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Food Lion, LLC) shall have up to and including the 22nd day of March 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 15th day of March 2006."
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

August 12, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40480

Summary Calendar

PHILIP GERALD BIQUET,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 9:03-CV-154-RHC-HWM

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Philip Gerald Biquet, Texas prisoner # 1120742, seeks relief

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 from his sta te-court jury-trial

conviction for felony drivi ng while intoxicated. Biquet was

granted a certificate of appealability (COA) by the district court

on the issues whether trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance

by failing to obtain medical records demonstrating that Biquet (1)

suffered from asthma, thereby justifying his refusal to submit toNo. 04-40480

-2-

a breathalyzer test and (2) had previously suffered two broken

ankles, thereby explaining Biquet’s failure to satisfactorily

perform those roadside sobriety tests requiring balance.

Biquet fails to meet the standard for obtaining habeas relief

on his certified claims of ineffective assistance. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254(d)(1) & (2); Strickland v. Washington

, 466 U.S. 668, 697

(1984); Dowthitt v. Johnson

, 230 F.3d 733, 741 (5th Cir. 2000).

The introduction at trial of Biquet’s medic al records would have

potentially had only a limited impact on the state’s case. The

record reveals other evidence of guilt presented at Biquet’s trial

that supports his conviction, including the arresting officers’

observations of intoxication, Biquet’s admission that he consumed

alcoholic beverages prior to his arrest, and Biquet’s inability to

perform sobriety tests, including sobriety tests that did not

require balance. Under these circumstances, Biquet fails to

demonstrate prejudice resulting from counsel’s alleged errors. S ee

Strickland , 466 U.S. at 697.

In a reply brief, Biquet asks this court to broaden the scope

of the COA “to include all issues presented t hat effected

petitioners right to have received a fair trial.” We reject this

request as untimely. S ee United States v. Williamson

, 183 F.3d

458, 464 n.11 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v. Kimler

, 150 F.3d

429, 431 (5th Cir. 1998); United States v. Prince , 868 F.2d 1379,

1386 (5th Cir. 1989).

AFFIRMED.
# C_2017404EN.01000101.xml

| 29.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 404/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 404/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 27 November 2017

adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2017

(2017/C 404/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| — | the Union’s budget for the financial year 2017 was definitively adopted on 1 December 2016 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union’s budget for the financial year 2017 was definitively adopted on 1 December 2016 (2),

2

| — | on 9 October 2017, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 6 to the general budget for the financial year 2017, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 9 October 2017, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 6 to the general budget for the financial year 2017,

| — | for needs related to national Treasury management, draft amending budget No 6 to the general budget for 2017 needs to be adopted without delay. Therefore, it is justified to shorten, in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Council’s Rules of Procedure, the 8-week period for the information of national Parliaments laid down in Article 4 of Protocol No 1, |
| --- | --- |

—

for needs related to national Treasury management, draft amending budget No 6 to the general budget for 2017 needs to be adopted without delay. Therefore, it is justified to shorten, in accordance with Article 3(3) of the Council’s Rules of Procedure, the 8-week period for the information of national Parliaments laid down in Article 4 of Protocol No 1,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2017 was adopted on 27 November 2017.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, on 27 November 2017.

For the Council

The President

M. MAASIKAS

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 51, 28.2.2017, p. 1.

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,132
<PP&E>                                         127,522
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,545,323
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       221,280
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,004,166)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,302
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,885,929
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               130,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,056,918)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,056,918)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,056,918)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 129 (Thursday, July 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 40485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14479]



[[Page 40485]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-7-2022]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 75--Phoenix, Arizona; Authorization of 
Production Activity; Sunlit Arizona LLC (Specialty Chemicals for 
Microchip Production); Phoenix, Arizona

    On March 3, 2022, Sunlit Arizona LLC submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within 
FTZ 75, in Phoenix, Arizona.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (87 FR 13963, March 11, 2022). On July 
1, 2022, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no 
further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The 
production activity described in the notification was authorized, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including 
Section 400.14.

    Dated: July 1, 2022.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Acting Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-14479 Filed 7-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gerald R. Tuskey, Chief Financial Officer of Eurasia Energy Limited, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Eurasia Energy Limited;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.









May 11, 2006

/s/Gerald R. Tuskey

Date

Gerald R. Tuskey,

Chief Financial Officer and Director
Letter Agreement, dated December 18, 2002



 Exhibit 10.29(a) 
  

[LOGO] 
  
 Wednesday, December 18, 2002 
  
 Mr. Joe Krivulka

 President 
 Reliant Pharmaceuticals, LLC 
 110 Allen Road 
 Liberty Corner, NJ 07938, USA 
  
 Dear Mr. Krivulka: 
  
 Upon acceptance by Reliant Pharmaceuticals, LLC, (“Reliant”), this letter will constitute an amendment of the “Development,
License and Supply Agreement”, dated May 7, 2001, between Ethypharm and Reliant. The parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Reimbursement of Expenses: Reliant shall reimburse Ethypharm for the expenses incurred for transferring manufacturing technology to the facility of Elite Pharmaceuticals,
North Vale, New Jersey, in order to manufacture two technical and one clinical cGMP batch of Ethypharm’s fenofibrate formulation during the year 2002. Such expenses, totaling $462,050.55, shall be invoiced to Reliant by a single separate and
itemized invoice by December 18, 2002 and be payable to Ethypharm by December 19, 2002. 

  

	2.	Credit to Reliant: By December 18, 2002, Ethypharm will provide Reliant with a credit note of $280,000 against Ethypharm’s invoice # 2002 09 0051, dated September 27,
2002. 

  

	3.	Amendment to Paragraph 4.2[b]: The first sentence of paragraph 4.2[b] is hereby amended by deleting $[***] in the first sentence and substituting $[***] in lieu
thereof. Paragraph 4.2[b][i] is hereby amended by deleting $[***] in the first sentence and substituting $[***] in lieu thereof. 

  

	4.	Miscellaneous: Except as expressly provided herein, all terms contained in the License Agreement shall remain in full force in effect. 

  
 If this letter accurately sets forth our agreement, please execute a copy of this letter and
return it to me. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  

	
	
	  
	 Gerard Leduc
 Chief Operation Officer Ethypharm
S.A.


  
 Accepted by Reliant Pharmaceuticals,
LLC: 
  

			
	 Name: 
	 	 
	 Title: 
	 	 



	[***]:	Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
STATE of North Carolina v. Keith Lamar BELLAMY and Leon McCoy.

No. 506P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Brian Michael Aus, Durham, for Keith Lamar Bellamy.

Christopher W. Brooks, William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney Generals, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant (Keith Lamar Bellamy) on the 6th day of September 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question and deny Petition for Discretionary Review filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal and the petition to deny is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of September 2005 by Defendant (Keith Lamar Bellamy) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6341

In Re: JAMES M. DEBARDELEBEN, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CR-83-50) Submitted: June 8, 2005 Decided: June 21, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. James M. DeBardeleben, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: James M. DeBardeleben petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has improperly refused to file his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to file his motion. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court filed DeBardeleben’s motion and issued a final order dismissing the motion as successive. DeBardeleben v. United States , No. 3:05-cv-00176 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 2005). Accordingly, because the district court has taken the action DeBardeleben seeks, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 10.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO CONFIDENTIAL
LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR NINTENDO GAMECUBE


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT (“First
Amendment”) amends that certain Confidential License Agreement for Nintendo
GameCube dated April 5, 2002 between Nintendo of America Inc. (“Nintendo”)
and THQ Inc. (“Licensee”) (“Agreement”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Nintendo and Licensee entered into the Agreement;


 


WHEREAS, the Agreement currently expires on April 5, 2005, and the
parties now desire to extend the Term of the Agreement as set forth below.


 


AMENDMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.                                       The
Term of the Agreement is hereby extended for an additional three (3) years.  The Term of the Agreement shall now expire on
April 5, 2008.


 


2.                                       All
other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.  This First Amendment may be
signed in counterparts, which together shall constitute one original First
Amendment.


 


Signatures
provided by facsimile shall be the equivalent of originals.


 


This First Amendment shall be effective as of April 5, 2005.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this First Amendment.


 


 


	
  NINTENDO:

  	
   

  	
  LICENSEE:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Nintendo of America Inc.

  	
   

  	
  THQ Inc.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  By:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Name: James R. Cannataro

  	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Its: EVP; Administration

  	
   

  	
  Its:
STATE of North Carolina v. Lorenzo Lee POPE and Demetri Monte Bell.

No. 212A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Nora Henry Hargrove, for Lorenzo Lee Pope.

David J. Adinolfi, II, Assistant Attorney General, Howard S. Boney, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

Richard Jester, for Demetri Monte Bell.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant (Pope) on the 10th day of May 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

> "Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
IN RE J.K.S.-L.

No. COA04-1475.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Onslow (04J59).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. TEETER.

No. COA05-1264.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Anson (03CRS50555, 03CRS3067).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed and remanded for correction of the sentencing worksheet.