##### Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

|  |  |                                                                                     
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|X |  | Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

Commission file no. 33-76644

COMMUNITYCORP

(Exact Name of
Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|South Carolina                                                 |  | 57-1019001                          
|(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



|                                                   |  |           
|-------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------
|1100 N. Jefferies Blvd. Walterboro, South Carolina |  | 29488     
|(Address of Principal Executive Offices)           |  | (Zip Code)

(843) 549-2265

Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes  ̈ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes  ̈ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES  ̈  NO x

Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90
days.                                        
                                         
 Yes x No  ̈

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer   ̈                Accelerated
filer   ̈                Non-accelerated filer   ̈                Smaller reporting company  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).    Yes  ̈ No x

The aggregate market value of the voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold was $17,749,128 as of March 26, 2010.

The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of March 26, 2010, was 234,003.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Annual
Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2009

Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of April 28, 2010



---

##### Table of Contents

COMMUNITYCORP

Index



|         |  |                                                                                                 |  |   
|-------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --
|PART I  
|Item 1   |  | Business                                                                                        |  | 3 
|Item 1A  |  | Risk Factors                                                                                    |  | 16
|Item 1B  |  | Unresolved Staff Comment                                                                        |  | 20
|Item 2   |  | Description of Properties                                                                       |  | 20
|Item 3   |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                               |  | 21
|Item 4   |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                             |  | 21
|PART II 
|Item 5   |  | Market for Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |  | 21
|Item 6   |  | Selected Financial Data                                                                         |  | 21
|Item 7   |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation            |  | 21
|Item 7A  |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                                      |  | 21
|Item 8   |  | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data                                                     |  | 21
|Item 9   |  | Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure            |  | 21
|Item 9A  |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                         |  | 21
|Item 9B  |  | Other Information                                                                               |  | 22
|PART III
|Item 10  |  | Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance of the Registrant                       |  | 22
|Item 11  |  | Executive Compensation                                                                          |  | 22
|Item 12  |  | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters  |  | 22
|Item 13  |  | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence                       |  | 23
|Item 14  |  | Principal Accountant Fees and Services                                                          |  | 23
|PART IV 
|Item 15  |  | Exhibits                                                                                        |  | 23



1



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report, including information included or
incorporated by reference in this document, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements may relate to our financial condition, results of operation, plans, objectives, or future performance. Forward-looking statements are based on many assumptions and estimates and are not
guarantees of future performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, as they will depend on many factors about which we are unsure, including many factors which are beyond our control.
The words may, would, could, should, will, expect, anticipate, predict, project, potential, believe,
continue, assume, believe, intend, plan, and estimate, as well as similar expressions, are meant to identify such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties
that could cause our actual results to differ from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to those described below under Risk Factors and the following:



| |  |  | reduced earnings due to higher credit losses generally and specifically because losses in the sectors of our loan portfolio secured by real estate are
greater than expected due to economic factors, including, but not limited to, declining real estate values, increasing interest rates, increasing unemployment, or changes in payment behavior or other factors;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | reduced earnings due to higher credit losses because our loans are concentrated by loan type, industry segment, borrower type, or location of the
borrower or collateral;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | high concentration of our real estate-based loans collateralized by real estate in a weak commercial real estate market;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | adequacy of the level of our allowance for loan losses;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | the rate of delinquencies and amounts of charge-offs;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | challenges, costs and complications associated with the continued development of our branches;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | changes in political conditions or the legislative or regulatory environment;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | significant increases in competitive pressure in Bank of Walterboros banking and financial services industries;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally and especially in our primary service area, becoming less favorable than expected,
resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market, and other capital markets;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | changes occurring in business conditions and inflation;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | changes in technology;
| | - |  | ----------------------

| |  |  | changes in monetary and tax policies;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------

| |  |  | the rates of loan growth;
| | - |  | -------------------------

| |  |  | adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | loss of consumer confidence and economic disruptions resulting from terrorist activities;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | changes in the securities markets; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------

| |  |  | other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These risks are exacerbated by the developments over the past two years in national and international
financial markets, and we are unable to predict what effect these uncertain market conditions will have on our Company. During 2008 and 2009, the capital and credit markets experienced unprecedented levels of extended volatility and
disruption. There can be no assurance that these unprecedented recent developments will not materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

All forward-looking statements in this report are based on information available to us as of the date of this report. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our
forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee you that these expectations will be achieved. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events, or otherwise.



2



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 1.      Description of Business

General

Communitycorp was organized in 1995 to serve as a bank holding company for Bank of Walterboro (the, Bank). The bank commenced business on May 1, 1989 as a South Carolina state-chartered bank headquartered in Walterboro,
South Carolina. The principal business activity of the Company is to provide banking services to domestic markets, principally in Colleton County, Jasper County and Northern Charleston County, South Carolina. The Company opened an additional branch
in 2004 in Ridgeland, South Carolina.

Our primary source of revenue is interest income and fees, which we earn by lending and
investing our capital and the funds which are held on deposit. Because loans generally earn higher rates of interest than investments, the bank seeks to employ as many of its deposit funds as possible in the form of loans to individuals and
businesses. To ensure sufficient liquidity, we also maintain a portion of the Banks deposits in cash, government securities, deposits with other financial institutions, and overnight loans of excess reserves (known as federal funds
sold) to correspondent banks. The revenue which the bank earns (prior to deducting its overhead expenses) is essentially a function of the amount of the Banks loans and deposits, as well as the profit margin (interest spread)
and fee income.

Marketing Focus

Our bank primarily serves the city of Walterboro and the surrounding area of Colleton County, South Carolina. The banks extended market area also includes the north side of Charleston County, South
Carolina where the Ravenel branch is located and Jasper County where the Ridgeland branch is located. The Bank strives to maintain its business in these market areas.

Banking Services

The bank strives to provide its customers with the
breadth of products and services comparable to those offered by large regional banks, while maintaining the quick response and personal service of a locally owned and managed bank. We offer a full range of deposit services and originate commercial
and personal loans.



| |  | Deposit Services.  The bank offers a full range of deposit services that are typically available in most banks and
savings and loan associations, including checking accounts, NOW accounts, savings accounts, and other time deposits of various types, ranging from daily money market accounts to longer-term certificates of deposit. The transaction accounts and time
certificates are tailored to our principal market area at rates competitive to those offered by other banks in the area. In addition, we offer certain retirement account services, such as Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). Deposits in the bank
are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to a maximum amount, which is currently $250,000 for each non-retirement depositor and $250,000 for certain retirement-account depositors. The FDICs temporary
increase of coverage up to $250,000 from $100,000 for each non-retirement depositor expires on December 31, 2013. The bank is participating in the FDICs Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (discussed below in greater detail) which, in
part, fully insures non-interest bearing transaction accounts
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Loan Products.  The bank offers a full range of commercial and personal loans. Commercial loans include both secured
and unsecured loans for working capital (including loans secured by inventory and accounts receivable), business expansion (including acquisition of real estate and improvements), and purchase of equipment and machinery. Consumer loans include
equity lines of credit and secured and unsecured loans for financing automobiles, home improvements, education, and personal investments. The bank also makes real estate construction and acquisition loans. The banks lending activities are
subject to a variety of lending limits imposed by federal law. While differing limits apply in certain circumstances based on the type of loan or the nature of the borrower (including the borrowers relationship to us), in general we are
subject to a loans-to-one-borrower limit of an amount equal to 15% of the banks unimpaired capital and surplus. We may not make any loans to any director, officer, employee, or 10% shareholder of the bank
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



3



---

##### Table of Contents

| | unless the loan is approved by our board of directors and is made on terms not more favorable to such a person than would be available to a person not affiliated with us.
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | Other Services.Other bank services include cash management services, safe deposit boxes, travelers checks, direct
deposit of payroll and social security checks, and automatic drafts for various accounts. The bank is associated with Honor and Plus networks of automated teller machines that may be used by our customers throughout South Carolina and other regions.
The bank also offers VISA credit card services through a correspondent bank as an agent for us. The Bank offers an Internet banking product accessible via the Banks custom website at www.bankofwalterboro.com.
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Competition

The Bank of Walterboro generally competes with other financial institutions through the selection of banking products and services offered, the pricing of services, the level of service provided, the
convenience and availability of services, and the degree of expertise and the personal manner in which services are offered. South Carolina law permits statewide branching by banks and savings institutions and many financial institutions in the
state have branch networks. Consequently, commercial banking in South Carolina is highly competitive. South Carolina law also permits interstate banking whereby out-of-state banks and bank holding companies are allowed to acquire and merge with
South Carolina banks and bank holding companies, as long as the South Carolina State Board of Financial Institutions gives prior approval for the acquisition or merger. A number of large banking organizations currently operate in the market areas of
the Bank of Walterboro, some of which are controlled by out-of-state ownership. In addition, competition between commercial banks and thrift institutions (savings institutions and credit unions) has been intensified significantly by the elimination
of many previous distinctions between the various types of financial institutions and the expanded powers and increased activity of thrift institutions in areas of banking that previously had been the sole domain of commercial banks. See
Supervision and Regulation.

The Bank of Walterboro faces increased competition from both federally-chartered and
state-chartered financial and thrift institutions, as well as credit unions, consumer finance companies, insurance companies and other institutions in the Bank of Walterboros market areas. Some of these competitors are not subject to the same
degree of regulation and restriction imposed upon the Bank of Walterboro. Many of these competitors also have broader geographic markets and substantially greater resources and lending limits than the Bank of Walterboro and offer certain
services that the Bank of Walterboro does not currently provide. In addition, some of these competitors have several branch offices located throughout the extended market areas of the Bank of Walterboro that we believe may provide these competitors
with an advantage in geographic convenience that the Bank of Walterboro does not have at present. Such competitors may also be in a position to make more effective use of media advertising, support services, and electronic technology than can
The Bank of Walterboro.

Employees

As of December 31, 2009, the Bank had forty-two full time and five part time employees. The Company had no employees.

Supervision and Regulations

Both Communitycorp and The Bank of Walterboro
are subject to extensive state and federal banking regulations that impose restrictions on and provide for general regulatory oversight of their operations. These laws generally are intended to protect depositors and not shareholders. The
following summary is qualified by reference to the statutory and regulatory provisions discussed. Changes in applicable laws or regulations may have a material effect on our business and prospects. Our operations may be affected by legislative
changes and the policies of various regulatory authorities. We cannot predict the effect that fiscal or monetary policies, economic control, or new federal or state legislation may have on our business and earnings in the future.

The following discussion is not intended to be a complete list of all the activities regulated by the banking laws or of the impact of such
laws and regulations on our operations. It is intended only to briefly summarize some material provisions.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

Recent Regulatory Developments

The following is a summary of recently enacted laws and regulations that could materially impact our business, financial condition or results of operations. This discussion should be read in
conjunction with the remainder of the Supervision and Regulation section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Markets in the United States and elsewhere have experienced extreme volatility and disruption over the past two years. These circumstances have exerted significant downward pressure on prices of equity securities and virtually all
other asset classes, and have resulted in substantially increased market volatility, severely constrained credit and capital markets, particularly for financial institutions, and an overall loss of investor confidence. Loan portfolio
performances have deteriorated at many institutions resulting from, among other factors, a weak economy and a decline in the value of the collateral supporting their loans. Dramatic slowdowns in the housing industry, due in part to falling home
prices and increasing foreclosures and unemployment, have created strains on financial institutions. Many borrowers are now unable to repay their loans, and the collateral securing these loans has, in some cases, declined below the loan
balance. In response to the challenges facing the financial services sector, several regulatory and governmental actions have been announced including:



|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act (EESA), approved by Congress and signed by President Bush on October 3, 2008, which, among other
provisions, allowed the U.S. Treasury to purchase troubled assets from banks, authorized the SEC to suspend the application of marked-to-market accounting, and raised the basic limit of FDIC deposit insurance from $100,000 to $250,000
through December 31, 2013;
|  | 
| |  | On October 7, 2008, the FDIC approved a plan to increase the rates banks pay for deposit insurance;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|  | 
| |  | On October 14, 2008, the U.S. Treasury announced the creation of a new program, the Capital Purchase Program, that encourages and allows financial
institutions to build capital through the sale of senior preferred shares to the U.S. Treasury on terms that are non-negotiable;                                                                                                                              
|  | 
| |  | On October 14, 2008, the FDIC announced the creation of the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP), which seeks to strengthen confidence
and encourage liquidity in the banking system. The TLGP has two primary components that are available on a voluntary basis to financial institutions:                                                                                                           



| |  |  | Guarantee of newly-issued senior unsecured debt; the guarantee would apply to new debt issued on or before October 31, 2009 and would provide
protection until December 31, 2012; issuers electing to participate would pay a 75 basis point fee for the guarantee; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Unlimited deposit insurance for non-interest bearing deposit transaction accounts; financial institutions electing to participate will pay a 10
basis point premium in addition to the insurance premiums paid for standard deposit insurance.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | On February 10, 2009, the U.S. Treasury announced the Financial Stability Plan, which earmarked $350 billion of the TARP funds authorized under EESA. Among
other things, the Financial Stability Plan includes:



| |  |  | A capital assistance program that will invest in mandatory convertible preferred stock of certain qualifying institutions determined on a basis and
through a process similar to the Capital Purchase Program;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | A consumer and business lending initiative to fund new consumer loans, small business loans and commercial mortgage asset-backed securities
issuances;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | A new public-private investment fund that will leverage public and private capital with public financing to purchase up to $500 billion to $1
trillion of legacy toxic assets from financial institutions; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Assistance for homeowners by providing up to $75 billion to reduce mortgage payments and interest
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



5



---

##### Table of Contents

| | rates and establishing loan modification guidelines for government and private programs.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | On February 17, 2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (the Recovery Act) was signed into law in an effort to, among other things,
create jobs and stimulate growth in the United States economy. The Recovery Act specifies appropriations of approximately $787 billion for a wide range of Federal programs and will increase or extend certain benefits payable under the Medicaid,
unemployment compensation, and nutrition assistance programs. The Recovery Act also reduces individual and corporate income tax collections and makes a variety of other changes to tax laws. The Recovery Act also imposes certain limitations on
compensation paid by participants in the U.S. Treasurys Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).
|  | 
| |  | On March 23, 2009, the U.S. Treasury, in conjunction with the FDIC and the Federal Reserve, announced the Public-Private Partnership Investment Program for
Legacy Assets which consists of two separate plans, addressing two distinct asset groups:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  



| |  |  | The first plan is the Legacy Loan Program, which has a primary purpose to facilitate the sale of troubled mortgage loans by eligible institutions,
including FDIC-insured federal or state banks and savings associations. Eligible assets are not strictly limited to loans; however, what constitutes an eligible asset will be determined by participating banks, their primary regulators, the FDIC and
the U.S. Treasury. Under the Legacy Loan Program, the FDIC has sold certain troubled assets out of an FDIC receivership in two separate transactions relating to the failed Illinois bank, Corus Bank, NA, and the failed Texas bank, Franklin Bank,
S.S.B. These transactions were completed in September 2009 and October 2009, respectively.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The second plan is the Securities Program, which is administered by the U.S. Treasury and involves the creation of public-private investment funds
to target investments in eligible residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued before 2009 that originally were rated AAA or the equivalent by two or more nationally recognized statistical rating
organizations, without regard to rating enhancements (collectively, Legacy Securities). Legacy Securities must be directly secured by actual mortgage loans, leases or other assets, and may be purchased only from financial institutions
that meet TARP eligibility requirements. The U.S. Treasury received over 100 unique applications to participate in the Legacy Securities PPIP and in July 2009 selected nine public-private investment fund managers. As of December 31, 2009,
public-private investment funds have completed initial and subsequent closings on approximately $6.2 billion of private sector equity capital, which was matched 100% by the U.S. Treasury representing $12.4 billion of total equity capital. The U.S.
Treasury has also provided $12.4 billion of debt capital, representing $24.8 billion of total purchasing power. As of December 31, 2009, public-private investment funds have drawn-down approximately $4.3 billion of total capital which has been
invested in certain non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage backed securities and cash equivalents pending investment.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | On May 22, 2009, the FDIC levied a one-time special assessment on all banks due on September 30, 2009;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|  | 
| |  | On November 12, 2009, the FDIC issued a final rule to require banks to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of
2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012 and to increase assessment rates effective on January 1, 2011; and                                                                                  
|  | 
| |  | On February 2, 2010, the U.S. President called on the U.S. Congress to create a new Small Business Lending Fund. Under this proposal, $30 billion in
TARP funds would be transferred to a new program outside of TARP to support small business lending. As proposed, only small- and medium-sized banks would qualify to participate in the program.

As a result of the enhancements to deposit insurance protection and the expectation that there will be demands on the FDICs deposit
insurance fund, our deposit insurance costs increased significantly in 2009. We have elected not to participate in the TARP Capital Purchase Program, but will consider participating in similar programs, if any, announced in the
future. Regardless of our lack of participation, governmental intervention and new regulations



6



---

##### Table of Contents

under these programs could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

COMMUNITYCORP

We own 100% of the outstanding capital stock of the Bank,
and therefore we are considered to be a bank holding company under the federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the Bank Holding Company Act). As a result, we are primarily subject to the supervision, examination and reporting
requirements of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (the Federal Reserve) under the Bank Holding Company Act and its regulations promulgated thereunder. As a bank holding company located in South Carolina, the South Carolina
Board of Financial Institutions also regulates and monitors all significant aspects of our operations.

Permitted
Activities.  Under the Bank Holding Company Act, a bank holding company is generally permitted to engage in, or acquire direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company engaged in, the following
activities:



| |  |  | banking or managing or controlling banks;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------

| |  |  | furnishing services to or performing services for our subsidiaries; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | any activity that the Federal Reserve determines to be so closely related to banking as to be a proper incident to the business of banking.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Activities that the Federal Reserve has found to be so closely related to banking as to be
a proper incident to the business of banking include:



| |  |  | factoring accounts receivable;
| | - |  | ------------------------------

| |  |  | making, acquiring, brokering or servicing loans and usual related activities;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | leasing personal or real property;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------

| |  |  | operating a non-bank depository institution, such as a savings association;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | trust company functions;
| | - |  | ------------------------

| |  |  | financial and investment advisory activities;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------

| |  |  | conducting discount securities brokerage activities;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | underwriting and dealing in government obligations and money market instruments;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | providing specified management consulting and counseling activities;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | performing selected data processing services and support services;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | acting as agent or broker in selling credit life insurance and other types of insurance in connection with credit transactions;
and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | performing selected insurance underwriting activities.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------

As a bank holding company we also can elect to be treated as a financial holding company, which would allow us engage in a broader array of activities. In sum, a financial holding company can
engage in activities that are financial in nature or incidental or complementary to financial activities, including insurance underwriting, sales and brokerage activities, providing financial and investment advisory services, underwriting services
and limited merchant banking activities. We have not sought financial holding company status, but may elect such status in the future as our business matures. If we were to elect in writing for financial holding company status, each insured
depository institution we control would have to be well capitalized, well managed and have at least a satisfactory rating under the CRA (discussed below).

The Federal Reserve has the authority to order a bank holding company or its subsidiaries to terminate any of these activities or to terminate its ownership or control of any subsidiary when it has
reasonable cause to believe that the bank holding companys continued ownership, activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of it or any of its bank subsidiaries.

Change in Control.  In addition, and subject to certain exceptions, the Bank Holding Company Act and the Change in
Bank Control Act, together with regulations promulgated there under, require Federal Reserve approval prior to any person or company acquiring control of a bank holding company. Control is conclusively presumed to exist if an individual
or company acquires 25% or more of any class of voting securities of a bank holding company.



7



---

##### Table of Contents

Following the relaxing of these restrictions by the Federal Reserve in September 2008,
control will be rebuttably presumed to exist if a person acquires more than 33% of the total equity of a bank or bank holding company, of which it may own, control or have the power to vote not more than 15% of any class of voting securities.

Source of Strength.  In accordance with Federal Reserve Board policy, we are expected to act
as a source of financial strength to the bank and to commit resources to support the bank in circumstances in which we might not otherwise do so. If the bank were to become undercapitalized (see below Bank of Walterboro 
Prompt Corrective Action), we would be required to provide a guarantee of the banks plan to return to capital adequacy. Additionally, under the bank Holding Company Act, the Federal Reserve Board may require a bank holding company to
terminate any activity or relinquish control of a nonbank subsidiary, other than a nonbank subsidiary of a bank, upon the Federal Reserve Boards determination that such activity or control constitutes a serious risk to the financial soundness
or stability of any depository institution subsidiary of the bank holding company. Further, federal bank regulatory authorities have additional discretion to require a bank holding company to divest itself of any bank or nonbank subsidiaries if the
agency determines that divestiture may aid the depository institutions financial condition. Further, any loans by a bank holding company to a subsidiary bank are subordinate in right of payment to deposits and certain other indebtedness of the
subsidiary bank. In the event of a bank holding companys bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank at a certain level would be assumed by the
bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority payment.

Capital Requirements.  The Federal Reserve Board
imposes certain capital requirements on the bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act, including a minimum leverage ratio and a minimum ratio of qualifying capital to risk-weighted assets. These requirements are essentially
the same as those that apply to the bank described below under Bank of WalterboroCapital Regulations. However, The Federal Reserve guidelines contain an exemption from the capital requirements for small bank holding
companies which in 2006 were amended to cover most bank holding companies with less than $500 million in total assets that do not have a material amount of debt or equity securities outstanding registered with the SEC. Although our class of
common stock is registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act, we believe that because our stock is not listed on any exchange or otherwise actively traded, the Federal Reserve Board will interpret its new guidelines to mean that
we qualify as a small bank holding company. Nevertheless, our Bank remains subject to these capital requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators
that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Banks financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that
involve quantitative measures of the Banks assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Banks capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative
judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Regardless, our Bank is well capitalized under these minimum capital requirements as set per bank regulatory agencies.

Subject to our capital requirements and certain other restrictions, we are able to borrow money to make a capital contribution to the bank,
and these loans may be repaid from dividends paid from the bank to the Company. Our ability to pay dividends depends on the banks ability to pay dividends to us, which is subject to regulatory restrictions as described below in Bank of
Walterboro  Dividends. We are also able to raise capital for contribution to the bank by issuing securities without having to receive regulatory approval, subject to compliance with federal and state securities laws.

South Carolina State Regulation.  As a South Carolina bank holding company under the South Carolina Banking and
Branching Efficiency Act, we are subject to limitations on sale or merger and to regulation by the South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions. We are not required to obtain the approval of the South Carolina Board prior to acquiring the
capital stock of a national bank, but we must notify them at least 15 days prior to doing so. We must receive the Boards approval prior to engaging in the acquisition of a South Carolina state chartered bank or another South Carolina bank
holding company.

Bank of Walterboro



8



---

##### Table of Contents

The Bank operates as a state bank incorporated under the laws of the State of South Carolina
and is subject to examination by the South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions. Deposits in the bank are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to a maximum amount, which is currently $100,000 for each
non-retirement depositor and $250,000 for certain retirement-account depositors. However, the FDIC has increased the coverage up to $250,000 for each non-retirement depositor through December 31, 2013, and the bank is participating in the
FDICs Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (discussed below in greater detail) which, in part, fully insures non-interest bearing transaction accounts.

The South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions and the FDIC regulate or monitor virtually all areas of the banks operations, including:



| |  |  | security devices and procedures;
| | - |  | --------------------------------

| |  |  | adequacy of capitalization and loss reserves;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------

| |  |  | loans;
| | - |  | ------

| |  |  | investments;
| | - |  | ------------

| |  |  | borrowings;
| | - |  | -----------

| |  |  | deposits;
| | - |  | ---------

| |  |  | mergers;
| | - |  | --------

| |  |  | issuances of securities;
| | - |  | ------------------------

| |  |  | payment of dividends;
| | - |  | ---------------------

| |  |  | interest rates payable on deposits;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------

| |  |  | interest rates or fees chargeable on loans;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------

| |  |  | establishment of branches;
| | - |  | --------------------------

| |  |  | corporate reorganizations;
| | - |  | --------------------------

| |  |  | maintenance of books and records; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------

| |  |  | adequacy of staff training to carry on safe lending and deposit gathering practices.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions requires the bank to maintain specified capital ratios and imposes limitations on the
banks aggregate investment in real estate, bank premises, and furniture and fixtures. The South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions also requires the bank to prepare quarterly reports on the banks financial condition in
compliance with its minimum standards and procedures.

All insured institutions must undergo regular on site examinations by
their appropriate banking agency. The cost of examinations of insured depository institutions and any affiliates may be assessed by the appropriate agency against each institution or affiliate as it deems necessary or appropriate. Insured
institutions are required to submit annual reports to the FDIC, their federal regulatory agency, and their state supervisor when applicable. The FDIC has developed a method for insured depository institutions to provide supplemental disclosure of
the estimated fair market value of assets and liabilities, to the extent feasible and practicable, in any balance sheet, financial statement, report of condition or any other report of any insured depository institution. The FDIC Improvement Act
also requires the federal banking regulatory agencies to prescribe, by regulation, standards for all insured depository institutions and depository institution holding companies relating, among other things, to the following:



| |  | internal controls;
|- |  | ------------------

| |  | information systems and audit systems;
|- |  | --------------------------------------

| |  | loan documentation;
|- |  | -------------------

| |  | credit underwriting;
|- |  | --------------------

| |  | interest rate risk exposure; and
|- |  | --------------------------------

| |  | asset quality.
|- |  | --------------

Prompt Corrective Action.  As an insured depository institution, the bank is required to comply with the capital requirements promulgated under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the regulations thereunder, which
set forth five capital categories, each with specific regulatory consequences. Under these regulations, the categories are:



| |  |  | Well Capitalized  The institution exceeds the required minimum level for each relevant capital measure. A well capitalized
institution is one (i) having a total capital ratio of 10% or greater, (ii) having a tier 1 capital ratio of 6% or greater, (iii) having a leverage capital ratio of 5% or
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



9



---

##### Table of Contents

| | greater and (iv) that is not subject to any order or written directive to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure.
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Adequately Capitalized  The institution meets the required minimum level for each relevant capital measure. No capital distribution may
be made that would result in the institution becoming undercapitalized. An adequately capitalized institution is one (i) having a total capital ratio of 8% or greater, (ii) having a tier 1 capital ratio of 4% or greater and (iii) having a leverage
capital ratio of 4% or greater or a leverage capital ratio of 3% or greater if the institution is rated composite 1 under the CAMELS (Capital, Assets, Management, Earnings, Liquidity and Sensitivity to market risk) rating system.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Undercapitalized  The institution fails to meet the required minimum level for any relevant capital measure. An undercapitalized
institution is one (i) having a total capital ratio of less than 8% or (ii) having a tier 1 capital ratio of less than 4% or (iii) having a leverage capital ratio of less than 4%, or if the institution is rated a composite 1 under the CAMELS rating
system, a leverage capital ratio of less than 3%.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Significantly Undercapitalized  The institution is significantly below the required minimum level for any relevant capital measure. A
significantly undercapitalized institution is one (i) having a total capital ratio of less than 6% or (ii) having a tier 1 capital ratio of less than 3% or (iii) having a leverage capital ratio of less than 3%.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Critically Undercapitalized  The institution fails to meet a critical capital level set by the appropriate federal banking agency. A
critically undercapitalized institution is one having a ratio of tangible equity to total assets that is equal to or less than 2%.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If the FDIC determines, after notice and an opportunity for hearing, that the bank is in an unsafe or unsound condition, the regulator is authorized to reclassify the bank to the next lower capital
category (other than critically undercapitalized) and require the submission of a plan to correct the unsafe or unsound condition.

If the bank is not well capitalized, it cannot accept brokered deposits without prior FDIC approval and, if approval is granted, cannot offer an effective yield in excess of 75 basis points on interests paid on deposits of comparable size
and maturity in such institutions normal market area for deposits accepted from within its normal market area, or national rate paid on deposits of comparable size and maturity for deposits accepted outside the banks normal market area.
Moreover, if the bank becomes less than adequately capitalized, it must adopt a capital restoration plan acceptable to the FDIC. The bank also would become subject to increased regulatory oversight, and is increasingly restricted in the scope of its
permissible activities. Each company having control over an undercapitalized institution also must provide a limited guarantee that the institution will comply with its capital restoration plan. Except under limited circumstances consistent with an
accepted capital restoration plan, an undercapitalized institution may not grow. An undercapitalized institution may not acquire another institution, establish additional branch offices or engage in any new line of business unless determined by the
appropriate Federal banking agency to be consistent with an accepted capital restoration plan, or unless the FDIC determines that the proposed action will further the purpose of prompt corrective action. The appropriate federal banking agency may
take any action authorized for a significantly undercapitalized institution if an undercapitalized institution fails to submit an acceptable capital restoration plan or fails in any material respect to implement a plan accepted by the agency. A
critically undercapitalized institution is subject to having a receiver or conservator appointed to manage its affairs and for loss of its charter to conduct banking activities.

An insured depository institution may not pay a management fee to a bank holding company controlling that institution or any other person having control of the institution if, after
making the payment, the institution, would be undercapitalized. In addition, an institution cannot make a capital distribution, such as a dividend or other distribution that is in substance a distribution of capital to the owners of the institution
if following such a distribution the institution would be undercapitalized. Thus, if payment of such a management fee or the making of such would cause the bank to become undercapitalized, it could not pay a management fee or dividend to us.

As of December 31, 2009, the bank was deemed to be well capitalized.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

Standards for Safety and Soundness.The Federal Deposit Insurance
Act (FDIA) also requires the federal banking regulatory agencies to prescribe, by regulation or guideline, operational and managerial standards for all insured depository institutions relating to: (i) internal controls, information
systems, and internal audit systems; (ii) loan documentation; (iii) credit underwriting; (iv) interest rate risk exposure; and (v) asset growth. The agencies also must prescribe standards for asset quality, earnings, and stock valuation, as
well as standards for compensation, fees, and benefits. The federal banking agencies have adopted regulations and Interagency Guidelines Prescribing Standards for Safety and Soundness to implement these required standards. These guidelines set
forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. Under the regulations, if the FDIC determines that the bank fails to
meet any standards prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require the bank to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard, as required by the FDIC. The final regulations establish deadlines for the
submission and review of such safety and soundness compliance plans.

Transactions with Affiliates and
Insiders.  The company is a legal entity separate and distinct from the bank and its other subsidiaries. Various legal limitations restrict the bank from lending or otherwise supplying funds to the company or its non-bank
subsidiaries. The company and the bank are subject to Section 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Federal Reserve Regulation W. Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act places limits on the amount of loans or extensions of credit to,
or investments in, or certain other transactions with, affiliates and on the amount of advances to third parties collateralized by the securities or obligations of affiliates. The aggregate of all covered transactions is limited in amount, as to any
one affiliate, to 10% of the banks capital and surplus and, as to all affiliates combined, to 20% of the banks capital and surplus. Furthermore, within the foregoing limitations as to amount, each covered transaction must meet specified
collateral requirements. The bank is forbidden to purchase low quality assets from an affiliate.

Section 23B of the
Federal Reserve Act, among other things, prohibits an institution from engaging in certain transactions with certain affiliates unless the transactions are on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable to such institution or its
subsidiaries, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with nonaffiliated companies.

Regulation W
generally excludes all non-bank and non-savings association subsidiaries of banks from treatment as affiliates, except to the extent that the Federal Reserve Board decides to treat these subsidiaries as affiliates. The regulation also limits the
amount of loans that can be purchased by a bank from an affiliate to not more than 100% of the banks capital and surplus.

The bank is also subject to certain restrictions on extensions of credit to executive officers, directors, certain principal shareholders, and their related interests. Such extensions of credit (i) must be made on substantially the same
terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with third parties and (ii) must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.

Branching.  Under current South Carolina law, we may open branch offices throughout South Carolina with the
prior approval of the South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions. In addition, with prior regulatory approval, the bank will be able to acquire existing banking operations in South Carolina. Furthermore, federal legislation has been passed
that permits interstate branching by banks if allowed by state law, and interstate merging by banks. However, South Carolina law, with limited exceptions, currently permits branching across state lines only through interstate mergers.

Anti-Tying Restrictions.  Under amendments to the Bank Holding Company Act and Federal Reserve regulations, a bank
is prohibited from engaging in certain tying or reciprocity arrangements with its customers. In general, a bank may not extend credit, lease, sell property, or furnish any services or fix or vary the consideration for these on the condition that (i)
the customer obtain or provide some additional credit, property, or services from or to the bank, the bank holding company or subsidiaries thereof or (ii) the customer may not obtain some other credit, property, or services from a competitor, except
to the extent reasonable conditions are imposed to assure the soundness of the credit extended. Certain arrangements are permissible: a bank may offer combined-balance products and may otherwise offer more favorable terms if a customer obtains two
or more traditional bank products; and certain foreign transactions are exempt from the general rule. A bank holding company or any bank affiliate also is subject to anti-tying requirements in connection with electronic benefit transfer services.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

Community Reinvestment Act.  The Community Reinvestment Act
(CRA) requires that, in connection with examinations of financial institutions within their respective jurisdictions, a financial institutions primary regulator, which is the FDIC for the bank, shall evaluate the record of each
financial institution in meeting the credit needs of its local community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. These factors are also considered in evaluating mergers, acquisitions, and applications to open a branch or facility. Failure
to adequately meet these criteria could impose additional requirements and limitations on our bank. Additionally, we must publicly disclose the terms of various Community Reinvestment Act-related agreements.

Finance Subsidiaries.  Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLBA), subject to certain conditions
imposed by their respective banking regulators, national and state-chartered banks are permitted to form financial subsidiaries that may conduct financial or incidental activities, thereby permitting bank subsidiaries to engage in
certain activities that previously were impermissible. The GLBA imposes several safeguards and restrictions on financial subsidiaries, including that the parent banks equity investment in the financial subsidiary be deducted from the
banks assets and tangible equity for purposes of calculating the banks capital adequacy. In addition, the GLBA imposes new restrictions on transactions between a bank and its financial subsidiaries similar to restrictions applicable to
transactions between banks and non-bank affiliates.

Consumer Protection Regulations.Activities of
the bank are subject to a variety of statutes and regulations designed to protect consumers. Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by the bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. The
banks loan operations are also subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:



| |  |  | The federal Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to
determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1978, as amended by the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, governing the use and provision of information to
credit reporting agencies, certain identity theft protections and certain credit and other disclosures;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act of 2009, governing interest rate increases and fee limits; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing these federal laws.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The deposit operations of the bank also are subject to:



| |  |  | the Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for
complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E issued by the Federal Reserve Board to implement that Act, which governs automatic deposits to and
withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



12



---

##### Table of Contents

Enforcement Powers.  The Bank and its institution-affiliated
parties, including its management, employees, agents, independent contractors, and consultants such as attorneys and accountants and others who participate in the conduct of the financial institutions affairs, are subject to potential
civil and criminal penalties for violations of law, regulations or written orders of a government agency. These practices can include the failure of an institution to timely file required reports or the filing of false or misleading information or
the submission of inaccurate reports. Civil penalties may be as high as $1,000,000 a day for such violations. Criminal penalties for some financial institution crimes have been increased to 20 years. In addition, regulators are provided
with greater flexibility to commence enforcement actions against institutions and institution-affiliated parties. Possible enforcement actions include the termination of deposit insurance. Furthermore, banking agencies power to issue
cease-and-desist orders were expanded. Such orders may, among other things, require affirmative action to correct any harm resulting from a violation or practice, including restitution, reimbursement, indemnifications or guarantees against
loss. A financial institution may also be ordered to restrict its growth, dispose of certain assets, rescind agreements or contracts, or take other actions as determined by the ordering agency to be appropriate.

Anti-Money Laundering.  Financial institutions must maintain anti-money laundering programs that include established
internal policies, procedures, and controls; a designated compliance officer; an ongoing employee training program; and testing of the program by an independent audit function. The company and the bank are also prohibited from entering into
specified financial transactions and account relationships and must meet enhanced standards for due diligence and knowing your customer in their dealings with foreign financial institutions and foreign customers. Financial
institutions must take reasonable steps to conduct enhanced scrutiny of account relationships to guard against money laundering and to report any suspicious transactions, and recent laws provide law enforcement authorities with increased access to
financial information maintained by banks. Anti-money laundering obligations have been substantially strengthened as a result of the USA Patriot Act, enacted in 2001 and renewed in 2006. Bank regulators routinely examine institutions for
compliance with these obligations and are required to consider compliance in connection with the regulatory review of applications. The regulatory authorities have been active in imposing cease and desist orders and money penalty
sanctions against institutions found to be violating these obligations.

USA Patriot Act.The USA
PATRIOT Act became effective on October 26, 2001, amended, in part, the Bank Secrecy Act, and provides, in part, for the facilitation of information sharing among governmental entities and financial institutions for the purpose of combating
terrorism and money laundering by enhancing anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws, as well as enhanced information collection tools and enforcement mechanics for the U.S. government, including: (i) requiring standards for
verifying customer identification at account opening; (ii) rules to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering;
(iii) reports by nonfinancial trades and businesses filed with the Treasury Departments Financial Crimes Enforcement Network for transactions exceeding $10,000; and (iv) filing suspicious activities reports by brokers and dealers if
they believe a customer may be violating U.S. laws and regulations and requires enhanced due diligence requirements for financial institutions that administer, maintain, or manage private bank accounts or correspondent accounts for non-U.S.
persons. Bank regulators routinely examine institutions for compliance with these obligations and are required to consider compliance in connection with the regulatory review of applications.

Under the USA Patriot Act, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) can send our banking regulatory agencies lists of the names
of persons suspected of involvement in terrorist activities. The bank can be requested, to search its records for any relationships or transactions with persons on those lists. If the bank finds any relationships or transactions, it must
file a suspicious activity report and contact the FBI.

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which is a
division of the U.S. Department of the Treasury, is responsible for helping to insure that United States entities do not engage in transactions with enemies of the United States, as defined by various Executive Orders and Acts of
Congress. OFAC has sent, and will send, our banking regulatory agencies lists of names of persons and organizations suspected of aiding, harboring or engaging in terrorist acts. If the bank finds a name on any transaction, account or wire
transfer that is on an OFAC list, it must freeze such account, file a suspicious activity report and notify the FBI. The Bank has appointed an OFAC compliance officer to oversee the inspection of its accounts and the filing of any
notifications. The Bank actively checks high-risk OFAC areas such as new accounts, wire transfers and customer files. The Bank performs these checks utilizing software, which is updated each time a modification is made to the lists
provided by OFAC and other agencies of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons.



13



---

##### Table of Contents

Privacy and Credit Reporting.  Financial institutions are required
to disclose their policies for collecting and protecting confidential information. Customers generally may prevent financial institutions from sharing nonpublic personal financial information with nonaffiliated third parties except under narrow
circumstances, such as the processing of transactions requested by the consumer or when the financial institution is jointly sponsoring a product or service with a nonaffiliated third party. Additionally, financial institutions generally may
not disclose consumer account numbers to any nonaffiliated third party for use in telemarketing, direct mail marketing or other marketing to consumers. It is the banks policy not to disclose any personal information unless required by
law.

Like other lending institutions, the bank utilizes credit bureau data in its underwriting activities. Use of such
data is regulated under the Federal Credit Reporting Act on a uniform, nationwide basis, including credit reporting, prescreening, sharing of information between affiliates, and the use of credit data. The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act of 2003 (the FACT Act) authorizes states to enact identity theft laws that are not inconsistent with the conduct required by the provisions of the FACT Act.

Payment of Dividends.  A South Carolina state bank may not pay dividends from its capital. All dividends must be paid out of undivided profits then on
hand, after deducting expenses, including reserves for losses and bad debts. The bank is authorized to pay cash dividends up to 100% of net income in any calendar year without obtaining the prior approval of the South Carolina Board of
Financial Institutions, provided that the bank received a composite rating of one or two at the last federal or state regulatory examination. The bank must obtain approval from the South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions prior to the
payment of any other cash dividends. In addition, under the FDIC Improvement Act, the bank may not pay a dividend if, after paying the dividend, the bank would be undercapitalized.

Check 21.  The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act gives substitute checks, such as a digital image of a check and copies made from that
image, the same legal standing as the original paper check. Some of the major provisions include:



| |  |  | allowing check truncation without making it mandatory;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | demanding that every financial institution communicate to accountholders in writing a description of its substitute check processing program and
their rights under the law;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | legalizing substitutions for and replacements of paper checks without agreement from consumers;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | retaining in place the previously mandated electronic collection and return of checks between financial institutions only when individual agreements
are in place;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | requiring that when accountholders request verification, financial institutions produce the original check (or a copy that accurately represents the
original) and demonstrate that the account debit was accurate and valid; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | requiring the re-crediting of funds to an individuals account on the next business day after a consumer proves that the financial institution
has erred.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Effect of Governmental Monetary Policies.  Our earnings are
affected by domestic economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government and its agencies. The Federal Reserve banks monetary policies have had, and are likely to continue to have, an important impact
on the operating results of commercial banks through its power to implement national monetary policy in order, among other things, to curb inflation or combat a recession. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board have major effects
upon the levels of bank loans, investments and deposits through its open market operations in United States government securities and through its regulation of the discount rate on borrowings of member banks and the reserve requirements against
member bank deposits. It is not possible to predict the nature or impact of future changes in monetary and fiscal policies.

Insurance of Accounts and Regulation by the FDIC.Deposits at the bank are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC. The Deposit Insurance Fund is the successor to the Bank
Insurance Fund and the Savings Association Insurance Fund, which were merged effective March 31, 2006. As insurer, the FDIC



14



---

##### Table of Contents

imposes deposit insurance premiums and is authorized to conduct examinations of and to require reporting by FDIC insured institutions. It also may prohibit any FDIC insured institution from
engaging in any activity the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a serious risk to the insurance fund. The FDIC also has the authority to initiate enforcement actions against savings institutions, after giving the Office of Thrift
Supervision an opportunity to take such action, and may terminate the deposit insurance if it determines that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or is in an unsafe or unsound condition.

Under regulations effective January 1, 2007, the FDIC adopted a new risk-based premium system that provides for quarterly assessments
based on an insured institutions ranking in one of four risk categories based upon supervisory and capital evaluations. For deposits held as of March 31, 2009, institutions were assessed at annual rates ranging from 12 to 50 basis
points, depending on each institutions risk of default as measured by regulatory capital ratios and other supervisory measures. Effective April 1, 2009, assessments also took into account each institutions reliance on secured
liabilities and brokered deposits. This resulted in assessments ranging from 7 to 77.5 basis points. In May 2009, the FDIC issued a final rule which levied a special assessment applicable to all insured depository institutions
totaling 5 basis points of each institutions total assets less Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, not to exceed 10 basis points of domestic deposits. This special assessment was part of the FDICs efforts to rebuild the Deposit
Insurance Fund. We paid this one-time special assessment in the amount of $72,425 to the FDIC at the end of the third quarter 2009.

In November 2009, the FDIC issued a rule that required all insured depository institutions, with limited exceptions, to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010,
2011 and 2012. The FDIC also adopted a uniform three-basis point increase in assessment rates effective on January 1, 2011. In December 2009, we paid $897,168 in prepaid risk-based assessments, which included $109,650 related to
the fourth quarter of 2009 that would have been otherwise payable in the first quarter of 2010. This amount is included in deposit insurance expense for 2009. The remaining $787,518 million in prepaid deposit insurance is included in
accrued prepaid expenses for 2009. As a result, we incurred increased insurance costs during 2009 than in previous periods.

FDIC insured institutions are required to pay a Financing Corporation assessment, in order to fund the interest on bonds issued to resolve thrift failures in the 1980s. For the first quarter of 2009, the Financing Corporation
assessment equaled 1.14 basis points for domestic deposits. These assessments, which may be revised based upon the level of deposits, will continue until the bonds mature in the years 2017 through 2019.

The FDIC may terminate the deposit insurance of any insured depository institution, including the bank, if it determines after a hearing
that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC or the OCC. It also
may suspend deposit insurance temporarily during the hearing process for the permanent termination of insurance, if the institution has no tangible capital. If insurance of accounts is terminated, the accounts at the institution at the time of
the termination, less subsequent withdrawals, shall continue to be insured for a period of six months to two years, as determined by the FDIC. Management of the bank is not aware of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to
termination of the banks deposit insurance.

Proposed Legislation and Regulatory
Action.  Legislative and regulatory proposals regarding changes in banking, and the regulation of banks, federal savings institutions, and other financial institutions and bank and bank holding company powers are being
considered by the executive branch of the federal government, Congress and various state governments. Certain of these proposals, if adopted, could significantly change the regulation or operations of banks and the financial services industry. New
regulations and statutes are regularly proposed that contain wide-ranging proposals for altering the structures, regulations, and competitive relationships of the nations financial institutions. On June 17, 2009, the U.S. Treasury
released a white paper entitled Financial Regulatory Reform  A New Foundation: Rebuilding Financial Supervision and Regulation (the Proposal) which calls for sweeping regulatory and supervisory reforms for the entire
financial sector and seeks to advance the following five key objectives: (i) promote robust supervision and regulation of financial firms, (ii) establish comprehensive supervision of financial markets, (iii) protect consumers and
investors from financial abuse, (iv) provide the government with

additional powers to monitor systemic risks, supervise
and regulate financial products and markets, and to resolve firms that threaten financial stability, and (v) raise international regulatory standards and improve international cooperation.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

The Proposal also includes the creation of a new federal agency designed to enforce consumer
protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA) would have authority to protect consumers of financial products and services and to regulate all providers (bank and non-bank) of such services. The CFPA would be
authorized to adopt rules for all providers of consumer financial services, supervise and examine such institutions for compliance, and enforce compliance through orders, fines, and penalties. The rules of the CFPA would serve as a
floor and individual states would be permitted to adopt and enforce stronger consumer protection laws.

On
November 10, 2009, Senate Banking Committee chairman Christopher Dodd proposed a significant regulatory reform bill that includes many of the features of the Proposal, including consolidating financial regulators, imposing higher capital
requirements on financial institutions, remaking the derivatives industry, and shifting consumer protection from an overlapping patchwork of regulators to a single new commission, the CFPA. This bill is still pending approval of the US Congress
and many subsequent amendments have been proposed. If this bill is adopted as proposed, we may become subject to multiple laws affecting its provision of loans and other credit services to consumers, which may substantially increase the cost of
providing such services.

On February 2, 2 010, the U.S. President called on the U.S. Congress to create a new Small
Business Lending Fund. Under this proposal, $30 billion in TARP funds would be transferred to a new program outside of TARP to support small business lending. As proposed, only small- and medium-sized banks would qualify to participate in
the program.

New regulations and statutes are regularly proposed that contain wide-ranging proposals for altering the
structures, regulations, and competitive relationships of the nations financial institutions. We cannot predict whether or in what form any proposed regulation or statute will be adopted or the extent to which our business may be affected
by any new regulation or statute.

Item 1A   Risk Factors

Our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be harmed by any of the following risks, or other risks that have not
been identified or which we believe are immaterial or unlikely. Shareholders should carefully consider the risks described below in conjunction with the other information in this Form 10-K and the information incorporated by reference in
this Form 10-K, including our consolidated financial statements and related notes

Negative developments in the financial industry
and the domestic and international credit markets may adversely affect our operations and results.

Negative
developments from the latter half of 2007 through 2009 in the global credit and securitization markets have resulted in uncertainty in the financial markets in general with the expectation of the general economic downturn continuing into
2010. As a result of this credit crunch, commercial as well as consumer loan portfolio performances have deteriorated at many institutions and the competition for deposits and quality loans has increased significantly. In
addition, the values of real estate collateral supporting many commercial loans and home mortgages have declined and may continue to decline. Global securities markets, and bank holding company stock prices in particular, have been negatively
affected, as has the ability of banks and bank holding companies to raise capital or borrow in the debt markets. As a result, significant new federal laws and regulations relating to financial institutions, including, without limitation, the
EESA and the U.S. Treasury Departments CPP, have been adopted. Furthermore, the potential exists for additional federal or state laws and regulations regarding, among other matters, lending and funding practices and liquidity standards,
and bank regulatory agencies are expected to be active in responding to concerns and trends identified in examinations, including the expected issuance of many formal enforcement orders. Negative developments in the financial industry and the
domestic and international credit markets, and the impact of new legislation in response to those developments, may negatively impact our operations by restricting our business operations, including our ability to originate or sell loans, and
adversely impact our financial performance. We can provide no assurance regarding the manner in which any new laws and regulations will affect us.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

There can be no assurance that recently enacted legislation will help stabilize the U.S. financial
system.

As described above under Supervision and Regulation, in response to the challenges facing the
financial services sector, a number of regulatory and governmental actions have been enacted or announced. There can be no assurance that these government actions will achieve their purpose. The failure of the financial markets to
stabilize, or a continuation or worsening of the current financial market conditions, could have a material adverse affect on our business, our financial condition, the financial condition of our customers, our common stock trading price, as well as
our ability to access credit. It could also result in declines in our investment portfolio which could be other-than-temporary impairments.

Continuation of the economic downturn could reduce our customer base, our level of deposits, and demand for financial products such as loans.

Our success significantly depends upon the growth in population, income levels, deposits, and housing starts in our markets. The
current economic downturn has negatively affected the markets in which we operate and, in turn, the quality of our loan portfolio. If the communities in which we operate do not grow or if prevailing economic conditions locally or nationally
remain unfavorable, our business may not succeed. A continuation of the economic downturn or prolonged recession would likely result in the continued deterioration of the quality of our loan portfolio and reduce our level of deposits, which in
turn would hurt our business. If the economic downturn continues or a prolonged economic recession occurs in the economy as a whole, borrowers will be less likely to repay their loans as scheduled. Moreover, in many cases the value of real
estate or other collateral that secures our loans has been adversely affected by the economic conditions and could continue to be negatively affected. Unlike many larger institutions, we are not able to spread the risks of unfavorable local
economic conditions across a large number of diversified economies. A continued economic downturn could, therefore, result in losses that materially and adversely affect our business.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate, and events that negatively impact the real estate market could hurt our
business.

A significant portion of our loan portfolio is secured by real estate as a primary or secondary component
of collateral. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. The recent weakening of the real
estate market could result in an increase in the number of borrowers who default on their loans and a reduction in the value of the collateral securing their loans, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our profitability and asset
quality. If we are required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy the debt during a period of reduced real estate values, our earnings and capital could be adversely affected. Acts of nature, including hurricanes,
tornados, earthquakes, fires and floods, which may cause uninsured damage and other loss of value to real estate that secures these loans, may also negatively impact our financial condition.

Our small- to medium-sized business target markets may have fewer financial resources to weather a continued downturn in the economy.

We target the banking and financial services needs of small- and medium-sized businesses. These businesses
generally have fewer financial resources in terms of capital borrowing capacity than larger entities. If general economic conditions continue to negatively impact these businesses in the markets in which we operate, our business, financial
condition, and results of operation may be adversely affected.

We are exposed to changes in the regulation of financial services
companies.

Proposals for further regulation of the financial services industry are continually being introduced in
the Congress of the United States of America and the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina. The agencies regulating the financial services industry also periodically adopt changes to their regulations. On September 7, 2008,
the Treasury Department announced that Fannie Mae (along with Freddie Mac) has been placed into conservatorship under the control of the newly created Federal Housing Finance Agency. On October 3, 2008, EESA was signed into law, and on
October 14, 2008 the U.S. Treasury Department announced the CPP under EESA. It is possible that additional legislative proposals may be adopted or regulatory changes may be made that would have an adverse effect on our business.



17



---

##### Table of Contents

Our FDIC Deposit Insurance premiums have risen significantly in the recent past and may continue to
increase in the future as a result of increased assessment rates imposed by the FDIC.

As a member institution of the
FDIC, we are required to pay semi-annual deposit insurance premium assessments to the FDIC. Due to the recent failure of several unaffiliated FDIC insurance depository institutions, and the FDICs new TLGP, the deposit insurance premium
assessments paid by all banks has increased. In addition, new FDIC requirements shift a greater share of any increase in such assessments onto institutions with higher risk profiles, including banks with heavy reliance on brokered deposits,
such as our bank. In the fourth quarter of 2009, the FDIC collected prepaid insurance assessments for the three years ending December 31, 2012 in an effort to restore fund balances. Continued increases in this expense would have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition.

Our continued pace of growth may require us to raise additional capital in the
future, but that capital may not be available when it is needed.

We are required by regulatory authorities to
maintain adequate levels of capital to support our operations. To support our continued growth, we may need to raise additional capital. Our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend in part on conditions in the capital
markets at that time, which are outside our control. Accordingly, we cannot assure you of our ability to raise additional capital, if needed, on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot raise additional capital when needed, our ability to
further expand our operations through internal growth and acquisitions could be materially impaired. In addition, if we decide to raise additional equity capital, your interest could be diluted.

We are exposed to the possibility of technology failure.

We rely on our computer systems and the technology of outside service providers. Our daily operations depend on the operational effectiveness of their technology. We rely on our systems to accurately
track and record our assets and liabilities. If our computer systems or outside technology sources become unreliable, fail, or experience a breach of security, our ability to maintain accurate financial records may be impaired, which could
materially affect our business operations and financial condition.

Our recent operating results may not be indicative of our future
operating results.

We may not be able to sustain our historical rates of growth of assets and earnings, and we may
not be able to grow our business at all. Although we have plans for continued expansion of our company, our historical results of operation will not necessarily be indicative of our future operations. Various factors, such as economic
conditions, regulatory and legislative considerations, and competition, may also impede our ability to expand our market presence. If we experience a significant decrease in our historical rate of growth, our results of operations and financial
condition may be adversely affected because a high percentage of our operating costs are fixed expenses.

Our decisions regarding credit
risk and reserves for loan losses may materially and adversely affect our business.

Making loans and other extensions
of credit is an essential element of our business. Although we seek to mitigate risks inherent in lending by adhering to specific underwriting practices, our loans and other extensions of credit may not be repaid. The risk of nonpayment is
affected by a number of factors, including:



| |  |  | the duration of the credit;
| | - |  | ---------------------------

| |  |  | credit risks of a particular customer;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------

| |  |  | changes in economic and industry conditions; and
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | in the case of a collateralized loan, risks resulting from uncertainties about the future value of the collateral.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We attempt to maintain an appropriate allowance for loan losses to provide for potential losses in our loan portfolio. We periodically
determine the amount of the allowance based on consideration of several factors, including:



| |  |  | an ongoing review of the quality, mix, and size of our overall loan portfolio;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | our historical loan loss experience;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------

| |  |  | evaluation of economic conditions;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



18



---

##### Table of Contents

| |  |  | regular reviews of loan delinquencies and loan portfolio quality; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | the amount and quality of collateral, including guarantees, securing the loans.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There is no precise method of predicting credit losses; therefore, we face the risk that charge-offs in future periods will exceed our
allowance for loan losses and that additional increases in the allowance for loan losses will be required. Additions to the allowance for loan losses would result in a decrease of our net income, and possibly our capital.

Changes in prevailing interest rates may reduce our profitability.

Our results of operations depend in large part upon the level of our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from interest-earning assets, such as loans
and securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and other borrowings. Depending on the terms and maturities of our assets and liabilities, a significant change in interest rates could have a material
adverse effect on our profitability. Many factors cause changes in interest rates, including governmental monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political conditions. While we intend to manage the effects of changes
in interest rates by adjusting the terms, maturities, and pricing of our assets and liabilities, our efforts may not be effective and our financial condition and results of operations could suffer. During the second half of 2007, the Federal
Reserve began to reduce short-term interest rates, which had an adverse effect on our earnings in 2008 and 2009 and may continue to negatively impact our earnings in 2010.

We are dependent on key individuals and the loss of one or more of these key individuals could curtail our growth and adversely affect our prospects.

Our president and chief executive officer, has extensive and long-standing ties within our primary market area and he has contributed
significantly to our growth. If we lose his services it could be difficult to replace him, and our business and development could be materially and adversely affected.

Our success also depends, in part, on our continued ability to attract and retain experienced loan originators, as well as other management personnel. The loss of the services
of several of such key personnel could adversely affect our growth strategy and prospects to the extent we are unable to replace such personnel.

We are subject to extensive regulation that could limit or restrict our activities.

We operate in a
highly regulated industry and are subject to examination, supervision, and comprehensive regulation by various regulatory agencies. Our compliance with these regulations is costly and restricts certain of our activities, including payment of
dividends, mergers and acquisitions, investments, loans and interest rates charged, interest rates paid on deposits, and locations of offices. We are also subject to capitalization guidelines established by our regulators, which require us to
maintain adequate capital to support our growth.

The laws and regulations applicable to the banking industry could change at
any time, and we cannot predict the effects of these changes on our business and profitability. Because government regulation greatly affects the business and financial results of all commercial banks and bank holding companies, our cost of
compliance could adversely affect our ability to operate profitably.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and the related
rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission that are now applicable to us, have increased the scope, complexity, and cost of corporate governance, reporting, and disclosure practices. We have experienced,
and we expect to continue to experience, greater compliance costs, including costs related to internal controls, as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

We face strong competition for customers, which could prevent us from obtaining customers and may cause us to pay higher interest rates to attract customers.

The banking business is highly competitive, and we experience competition in our market from many other financial institutions. We
compete with commercial banks, credit unions, savings and loan associations, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market funds, and other mutual funds, as well as other
super-regional, national, and international financial institutions that operate



19



---

##### Table of Contents

offices in our primary market areas and elsewhere. We compete with these institutions both in attracting deposits and in making loans. In addition, we have to attract our client base
from other existing financial institutions and from new residents. Many of our competitors are well-established, larger financial institutions. These institutions offer some services, such as extensive and established branch networks, that
we do not currently provide. There is a risk that we will not be able to compete successfully with other financial institutions in our market, and that we may have to pay higher interest rates to attract deposits, resulting in reduced
profitability. In addition, competitors that are not depository institutions are generally not subject to the extensive regulations that apply to us.

We will face risks with respect to future expansion and acquisitions or mergers.

If we ever decide to acquire other financial institutions, expand into new markets, open new lines of business, offer new products or services, these activities would involve a number of risks, including:



| |  |  | taking additional time and creating expense associated with identifying and evaluating potential acquisitions and merger partners;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | using inaccurate estimates and judgments to evaluate credit, operations, management, and market risks with respect to the target institution or assets;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | diluting our existing shareholders in an acquisition;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | taking additional time and creating expense associated with evaluating new markets for expansion, hiring experienced local management, and opening new
offices, as there may be a substantial time lag between these activities before we generate sufficient assets and deposits to support the costs of the expansion;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | taking a significant amount of time negotiating a transaction or working on expansion plans, resulting in managements attention being diverted
from the operation of our existing business;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | taking time and creating expense integrating the operations and personnel of the combined businesses;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | creating an adverse short-term effect on our results of operations; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |  | losing key employees and customers as a result of an acquisition that is poorly received.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We have never acquired another institution before, so we lack experience in handling any of these risks. There is also a risk that any
expansion effort will not be successfully.

Item 1B   Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable

Item 2.     Description of Property

The Company
owns a 5,400 square foot facility located at 1100 North Jefferies Boulevard, Walterboro, South Carolina, which is its corporate banking office. Construction on this facility was completed in 1989 at a total cost, including land, furniture and
fixtures of $775,345. All corporate headquarters as well as normal banking services and operations are housed at this location. The facility has a second floor which would allow for expansion consisting of 2,700 square feet. The existing building
was built to adequately serve the anticipated needs of the Bank for the foreseeable future.

The Company opened its second
banking location at 6225 Savannah Highway, Ravenel, South Carolina. This 3,622 square foot facility opened for business on October 6, 1997 and provides traditional banking services. The total cost of this facility, including land, and furniture
and fixtures was $930,344.

The Company acquired a 5500 square foot building at 110 Forest Hills Road in Walterboro, South
Carolina on November 16, 2000 and began using it as a branch location in 2001. The total cost of the facility, including land, was $485,000.

The Company opened its fourth banking location at 398 East Main street Ridgeland, South Carolina. This 3,800 square foot facility opened for business on December 6, 2004 and provides traditional
banking services. The total cost of this facility, including land, and furniture and fixtures was $1,105,257.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 3.     Legal Proceedings

The Company may from time to time be a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business,
but management of the Company is not aware of any pending or threatened litigation or unasserted claims or assessments that are expected to result in losses, if any, that would be material to the Companys business and operations.

Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.

Part II

Item 5.     Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

In response to
this Item, the information contained on page 50 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 6.     Selected Financial Data

In response to this Item, the information contained on page 3 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 7.     Managements Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

In response to this Item, the information contained on pages 8 through 24 of the Companys Annual Report to
Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative disclosure about Market Risk

In response to this Item, the information contained on pages 8 through 24 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 8.     Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

In response to this Item, the information contained on pages 26 through 50 of the Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for the year
ended December 31, 2009 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.     Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable

Item 9A.  Control and Procedures

As of the end of the period
covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of
December 31, 2009. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the fourth fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.



21



---

##### Table of Contents

The design of any system of controls and procedures is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Managements Annual Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in the Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f). A system of internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, the Companys management has evaluated the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009 based on the criteria
established in a report entitled Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and the interpretive guidance issued by the Commission in Release
No. 34-55929. Based on this evaluation, the Companys management has evaluated and concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2009.

The Company is continuously seeking to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of its operations and of its internal controls. This results
in modifications to its processes throughout the Company. However, there has been no change in its internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.

This annual report does
not include an attestation report of the companys registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by the companys registered public accounting
firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the company to provide only managements report in this annual report.

Item 9B.  Other Information

Not applicable

Part III

Item 10.   Directors, Executive Officers, Corporate Governance of the Registrant

In response to this Item, the information contained on pages 2 through 3 of the Companys Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 28,
2010 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11.   Executive Compensation

In response to this Item, the information contained on page 6 of the Companys Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 28, 2010 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

In response to this Item, the information contained on page 5 of the Companys Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 28, 2010 is incorporated herein by
reference.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

In response to this Item, the information contained on page 5 of the Companys Proxy Statement for the Annual
Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 28, 2010 is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

In
response to this Item, the information contained on page 4 of the Companys Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 28, 2010 is incorporated herein by reference.

Part IV

Item 15.    Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules



|13 | Annual Report of Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 (Incorporated by reference)
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|21.1 | Subsidiaries of the Company
|---- | ---------------------------



|31.1 | Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications
|---- | -----------------------------



|31.2 | Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications
|---- | -----------------------------



|32 | Section 1350 Certification
|-- | --------------------------



23



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

BANK OF WALTERBORO



|      |  |                 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                    |  | 
|----- |  | --------------- |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | --- |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------ |  | 
|Date: |  | March 26, 2010  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | By: |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook |  | 
|      |  | W. Roger Crook. |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |     |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                    |  | 

President and Chief Executive Officer

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints W. Roger Crook, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full
power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully
to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.



|                          |  |                                  |  |               
|------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- |  | --------------
|Signature                 |  | Title                            |  | Date          
|                          |  |                                 
|/s/ W. Roger Crook        |  |                                  |  |               
|W. Roger Crook            |  | President, Director (CEO)        |  | March 26, 2010
|                          |  |                                 
|/s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton   |  |                                  |  |               
|Gwendolyn P. Bunton       |  | Vice President (CFO)             |  | March 26, 2010
|                          |  |                                 
|/s/ Peden B. McLeod       |  |                                  |  |               
|Peden B. McLeod           |  | Director & Chairman of the Board |  | March 26, 2010
|                          |  |                                 
|/s/ George W. Cone        |  |                                  |  |               
|George W. Cone            |  | Director & Corporate Secretary   |  | March 26, 2010
|                          |  |                                 
|/s/ J. Barnwell Fishburne |  |                                  |  |               
|J. Barnwell Fishburne     |  | Director                         |  | March 26, 2010
|                          |  |                                 
|/s/ Harry L. Hill         |  |                                  |  |               
|Harry L. Hill             |  | Director                         |  | March 26, 2010
|                          |  |                                 
|/s/ Steven D. Murdaugh    |  |                                  |  |               
|Steven D. Murdaugh        |  | Director                         |  | March 26, 2010
|                          |  |                                 
|/s/ Harold M. Robertson   |  |                                  |  |               
|Harold M. Robertson       |  | Director                         |  | March 26, 2010
|                          |  |                                 
|/s/ J. Reaves McLeoad     |  |                                  |  |               
|J. Reaves McLeoad         |  | Director                         |  | March 26, 2010



24



---

##### Table of Contents

Index To Exhibits

Exhibit No. Description



|     |  |                                                                                               
|---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|13   |  | Annual Report of Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2009 (Incorporated by reference)
|     | 
|21.1 |  | Subsidiaries of the Company                                                                   
|     | 
|31.1 |  | Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications                                                                 
|     | 
|31.2 |  | Rule 15d-14(a) Certifications                                                                 
|     | 
|32   |  | Section 1350 Certifications                                                                   



25