40780 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 

confidential input concerning any or all 

of these questions. In addition, this 

representative list does not cover all 

aspects of a new system to replace 

SUGARS. Therefore, we welcome other 

input on topics not covered in these 

questions. In particular, please provide 

any additional recommendations related 

to achieving the seven objectives noted 

above. 

1. Should the new system continue 

the current SUGARS structure 

resembling an online checking account? 

For example: Exports for SCP licensees 

and use for polyhydric alcohol licensees 

count as deposits. Meanwhile, 

purchases of program sugar from 

licensed refiners qualify as withdrawals. 

In turn, refiners rely on their balances 

of exports, imports, and transfers to 

enter low-duty imports of raw cane 

sugar. 

2. SUGARS currently requires 

licensees to use a spreadsheet tool to 

upload data to their accounts. After 

receiving and reviewing the uploaded 

information, FAS transmits by email to 

licensees their balance information. FAS 

envisions a new, more thoroughly 

encrypted seamless approach for 

communicating this data, like an online 

checking account. What features are 

needed in a new system to allow 

licensees and FAS to more easily and 

more securely transmit, verify and 

access data? 

3. The new system could be created 

to permit each licensee complete access 

to data and license documents provided 

by the licensee to FAS without having 

to obtain permission from FAS, such as 

the original application package. These 

documents could be stored for a number 

of years in the licensee’s account in the 

new system. Please share your 

perspectives on this matter. 

4. In what ways could or should the 

new system allow or require licensees to 

upload supporting documents for each 

program transaction? 

5. Should the license application 

process be incorporated into the new 

system? 

6. What other features, if any, should 

the new system include to improve 

program operations? 

Any information obtained from this 

RFI is intended to be used by the 

Government on a non-attribution basis 

for planning and developing a successor 

system to SUGARS. This RFI does not 

constitute a formal solicitation for 

proposals or abstracts. Your response to 

this notice will be treated as information 

only. FAS will not reimburse any costs 

incurred in responding to this RFI. 

Respondents are advised that FAS is 

under no obligation to acknowledge 

receipt of the information received or 

provide feedback to respondents with 

respect to any information submitted 

under this RFI. Responses to this RFI do 

not bind FAS to any further actions 

related to this topic. Responses will 

become government property. 

No confidential information, such as 

confidential business information or 

proprietary information, should be 

submitted in comments for this RFI. 

Comments received in response to this 

notice will be a matter of public record 

and will be made available for public 

inspection and posted without change 

and as received, including any business 

information or personal information 

provided in the comments, such as 

names and addresses. Please do not 

include anything in your comment 

submission that you do not wish to 

share with the general public. 

Aileen Mannix, 

Acting Licensing Authority, Foreign 

Agricultural Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14556 Filed 7–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Final Record of Decision for the 

Carson National Forest 

AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture 

(USDA). 

ACTION: Notice of approval of the 

Revised Land Management Plan for the 

Carson National Forest. 

SUMMARY: James Duran, the Forest 

Supervisor for the Carson National 

Forest, Southwestern Region, signed the 

final record of decision (ROD) for the 

Revised Land Management Plan (LMP) 

for the Carson National Forest Land. 

The final ROD documents the rationale 

for approving the LMP and is consistent 

with the Reviewing Officer’s responses 

to objections and instructions. 

DATES: The revised LMP for the Carson 

National Forest will become effective 30 

days after the publication of this notice 

of approval in the Federal Register (36 

CFR 219.17(a)(1)). 

ADDRESSES: To view the signed final 

ROD, final environmental impact 

statement (FEIS), the revised LMP, and 

other related documents, please visit the 

Carson National Forest website at: 

https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/carson/ 

landmanagement/planning/ 

?cid=stelprdb5443166. 

A legal notice of approval is also 

being published in the newspaper of 

record, The Taos News. A copy of this 

legal notice will be posted on the Carson 

National Forest’s website shown above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Rich, Forest Planner, Carson 

National Forest, at peter.rich@usda.gov 

or 575–758–6277. 

Individuals who use 

telecommunication devices for the deaf 

and hard of hearing (TDD) may call the 

Federal Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800– 

877–8339, 24 hours a day, every day of 

the year, including holidays. Written 

requests for information may be sent to 

Carson National Forest, Attn: Carson 

National Forest Plan Revision, 208 Cruz 

Alta Rd., Taos, NM 87571. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Carson National Forest covers six ranger 

districts across nearly 1.5 million acres 

of National Forest System land in the 

northern New Mexico counties of Taos, 

Rio Arriba, Colfax, and Mora. The LMP 

was developed pursuant to the 2012 

Forest Service Planning Rule (36 CFR 

219) and will replace the 1986 Land 

Management Plan. The LMP describes 

desired conditions, objectives, 

standards, guidelines, and land 

suitability for project and activity 

decision-making and will guide all 

resource management activities on the 

Forest. The Carson National Forest plays 

an important role supporting and 

partnering with communities in 

northern New Mexico and throughout 

the southwestern United States by 

providing economic benefits including 

fuelwood gathering, livestock grazing, 

and abundant recreational 

opportunities. The development of the 

LMP was shaped by the best available 

scientific information, current laws, and 

public input. 

The Carson National Forest initiated 

plan revision in 2014 and engaged the 

public frequently throughout the 

process. This engagement effort has 

included conventional public meetings, 

information sharing via social media, 

and collaborative work sessions with 

cooperating agencies. The Forest invited 

State, local and Tribal governments, and 

other federal agencies from around the 

region to participate in the process to 

revise the LMP. The Carson National 

Forest engaged in government-togovernment consultation with 16 tribes 

during LMP revision, ensuring tribalrelated plan direction accurately reflects 

the Carson National Forest’s trust 

responsibilities and government-togovernment relationship with tribes. A 

cooperating agency working group met 

regularly throughout the plan revision 

effort. During the 90-day comment 

period in 2019 for the draft LMP and 

draft EIS, the Carson National Forest 

received 5,740 letters, which helped 

refine the preferred alternative and 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 40781 

augment plan content based on response 

to comments. 

A draft ROD, LMP, and FEIS were 

released in September 2021, initiating a 

60-day objection filing period that 

closed November 2, 2021. The Carson 

National Forest received 16 eligible 

objections. Through a comprehensive 

review of each objection, a variety of 

issues were identified. Following the 

objection review, the Reviewing Officer 

held objection resolution meetings with 

objectors and interested persons. Based 

on these meetings, the Reviewing 

Officer issued a written response on 

May 24, 2022. The instructions from the 

Reviewing Officer were addressed in the 

final ROD, LMP, and FEIS. 

Responsible Official 

The Responsible Official for 

approving the LMP is James Duran, 

Forest Supervisor, Carson National 

Forest. The Responsible Official 

approving the list of species of 

conservation concern is Michiko Martin, 

Regional Forester, Southwestern Region. 

Dated: June 30, 2022. 

Deborah Hollen, 

Acting Associate Deputy Chief, National 

Forest System. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14535 Filed 7–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3411–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

Forest Service 

Tonto National Forest; Arizona; 

Revision of the Land Management Plan 

for the Tonto National Forest 

AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture 

(USDA). 

ACTION: Notice to reinitiate opportunity 

to object to the revised land 

management plan and the Regional 

Forester’s list of species of conservation 

concern for the Tonto National Forest. 

SUMMARY: The Forest Service is revising 

the Tonto National Forest’s Land 

Management Plan and has prepared a 

final environmental impact statement 

(FEIS) for its revised Land Management 

Plan (LMP) and a draft record of 

decision (ROD). This notice is to inform 

the public that the Federal Register 

notice and legal notice posted on March 

25, 2022, had an incorrect website to 

submit objections electronically through 

the comment analysis and response 

application (CARA). The correct website 

to submit an objection is listed below. 

This notice reinitiates the 60-day period 

where individuals or entities with 

specific concerns about the Tonto 

National Forest’s revised LMP, draft 

ROD, and the associated FEIS may file 

objections for Forest Service review 

prior to plan approval. This is also an 

opportunity to object to the Regional 

Forester’s list of species of conservation 

concern (SCC) for the Tonto National 

Forest. Those that submitted objections 

during the original objection period 

must resubmit their objections to be 

considered. 

DATES: The publication date of the legal 

notice in the Tonto National Forest’s 

newspaper of record, Arizona Capitol 

Times, initiates the 60-day objection 

period and is the exclusive means for 

calculating the time to file an objection 

(36 CFR 219.52(c)(5)). An electronic 

scan of the legal notice with the 

publication date will be posted at 

https://www.fs.usda.gov/project/ 

?project=51592. 

ADDRESSES: The Tonto National Forest’s 

revised LMP, FEIS, draft ROD, SCC list, 

and other supporting information is 

available for review at https://

www.fs.usda.gov/project/ 

?project=51592. Hard copies of the 

Tonto National Forest’s revised LMP, 

FEIS, draft ROD, and Regional Forester’s 

list of SCC can be obtained at the Tonto 

National Forest Supervisor’s Office, 

2324 E McDowell Rd., Phoenix, AZ 

85006, Phone: (602) 225–5200. 

Objections must be submitted to the 

Objection Reviewing Officer by one of 

the following methods: 

• Electronically to the Objection 

Reviewing Officer via the CARA 

objection web form: https://

cara.fs2c.usda.gov/Public// 

CommentInput?Project=51592. 

Electronic submissions must be 

submitted in a format (Word, PDF, or 

Rich Text) that is readable and 

searchable with optical character 

recognition software. 

• Via regular mail to the following 

address: USDA-Forest Service 

Southwest Region, ATTN: Objection 

Reviewing Officer, 333 Broadway Blvd. 

SE, Albuquerque, NM 87102. 

• By Fax: 505–842–3173. Faxes must 

be addressed to ‘‘Objection Reviewing 

Officer.’’ The fax coversheet should 

include a subject line with ‘‘Tonto 

National Forest Plan Revision 

Objection’’ or ‘‘Tonto Species of 

Conservation Concern’’ and specify the 

number of pages being submitted. 

• To submit an objection via hand 

delivery, please contact your local 

district office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Forest Planner, Kenna Belsky, at 

kenna.belsky@usda.gov or (602) 225– 

5200. 

Individuals who use 

telecommunication devices for the deaf 

or hard of hearing (TDD) may call the 

Federal Information Relay Service (FRS) 

at 1–800–877–8339, 24 hours a day, 

every day of the year, including 

holidays. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

decision to approve the revised Land 

Management Plan and the Regional 

Forester’s list of species of conservation 

concern for the Tonto National Forest 

will be subject to the objection process 

identified in 36 CFR part 219 Subpart B 

(219.50 to 219.62). Per 36 CFR 219.53, 

only individuals and entities who have 

submitted substantive formal comments 

related to a plan revision during the 

opportunities for public comment 

attributed to the objector may file an 

objection unless the objection concerns 

an issue that arose after the 

opportunities for formal comment. 

How To File an Objection 

Objections must be submitted to the 

Objection Reviewing Officer at the 

address shown in the ADDRESSES section 

of this notice. An objection must 

include the following (36 CFR 

219.54(c)): 

(1) The objector’s name and address 

along with a telephone number or email 

address if available. In cases where no 

identifiable name is attached to an 

objection, the Forest Service will 

attempt to verify the identity of the 

objector to confirm objection eligibility; 

(2) Signature or other verification of 

authorship upon request (a scanned 

signature for electronic mail may be 

filed with the objection); 

(3) Identification of the lead objector, 

when multiple names are listed on an 

objection. The Forest Service will 

communicate to all parties to an 

objection through the lead objector. 

Verification of the identity of the lead 

objector must also be provided if 

requested; 

(4) The name of the plan, plan 

amendment, or plan revision being 

objected to, and the name and title of 

the responsible official; 

(5) A statement of the issues and/or 

parts of the plan, plan amendment, or 

plan revision to which the objection 

applies; 

(6) A concise statement explaining the 

objection and suggesting how the draft 

plan decision may be improved. If the 

objector believes that the plan, plan 

amendment, or plan revision is 

inconsistent with law, regulation, or 

policy, an explanation should be 

included; 

(7) A statement that demonstrates the 

link between the objector’s prior 

substantive formal comments and the 

content of the objection, unless the 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1