alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**
I, Robert M. Neumeister, Jr., certify that:
1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media West LLC;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors or (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 6, 2005              /s/ Robert M. Neumeister, Jr.   Robert M. Neumeister, Jr.   Executive Vice President and
CERTIFICATION UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the following certification is being made to
accompany the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
June 30, 2005:

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Alliance Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark S. Elliott, Acting Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Date: August 15, 2005         /s/ Mark S. Elliott
                              -----------------------------------
                              Name: Mark S. Elliott
                              Title: President (acting Chief Executive
                              Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer)
Charlie Lee RICHARDSON v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION and STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.

No. 642A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Charlie Lee Richardson, Pro Se.

Laura E. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for Dept. of Public Instruction.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff on the 28th day of December 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 25th day of January 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> 
*206
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."
Flores Field PSA


         SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT


     WHEREAS, on April 19, 2005, Smith Production Inc., as
Seller, and Fidelity Exploration & Production Company, as
Purchaser, entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement covering
Flores Field having an Effective Time of May 1, 2005 at 7:00 a.m.
(the "Agreement");

     WHEREAS, previously, Smith Production Inc. and Fidelity
Exploration & Production Company amended the Agreement as
provided in the First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement;

     WHEREAS, Smith Production Inc. and Fidelity Exploration &
Production Company desire to amend the Agreement again as
provided in this Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement
(the "Amendment");

     WHEREAS, all defined terms which are not defined in this
Amendment shall have the same meaning as in the Agreement;

     NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration received, Smith
Production Inc. and Fidelity Exploration & Production Company
hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

1. In Section 11.3(c)(v) in the Agreement, the following language
is added after the final semi-colon and before the word "OR":

     "Paul Lopez and Lisa Marie Acuna, v Smith Production Inc.;
     Cause No. CL-04-2679-E in the County Court at Law No. 5 of
     Hidalgo County, Texas;"

2. The following language is added to Exhibit 5.7 in the
Agreement:

     "Paul Lopez and Lisa Marie Acuna, v Smith Production Inc.;
     Cause No. CL-04-2679-E in the County Court at Law No. 5 of
     Hidalgo County, Texas."

     As amended herein, the Agreement is hereby adopted, ratified
and confirmed as being in full force and effect pursuant to their
terms.

     This Amendment shall be binding on Smith Production Inc.,
Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and their respective
successors and assigns.

     This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall have the same force and effect as an
original.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by Smith
Production Inc. and Fidelity Exploration & Production Company to
be effective as of April 19, 2005.


Smith Production Inc.

By: /s/ GLENN R. SMITH
Glenn R. Smith, President


Fidelity Exploration & Production Company

By: /s/ DARWIN SUBART
Darwin Subart, President
Board of Director's Annual Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 Attachment A 
  
 CARRAMERICA REALTY CORPORATION 
  
 BOARD OF DIRECTORS ANNUAL COMPENSATION 
 As of July 28, 2005 
  

																																		
	 Retainer

	  	Chair Fees

	  	Meeting Fees


	 Annual
 Board
 Retainer

	  	 Audit
 Cmte
 Chair

	  	 Comp
 Cmte
 Chair

	  	 Nom/Corp
Gov Cmte
 Chair

	  	 Invest
 Cmte
 Chair

	  	 Exec
 Cmte
 Chair

	  	 Board
 Meeting
 Fee

	  	 Audit
 Cmte
 Meeting
Fee

	  	 Comp
 Cmte
 Meeting
 Fee

	  	 Nom/Corp
 Gov Cmte
 Meeting
 Fee

	  	 Invest
 Cmte
 Meeting
 Fee

	  	 Exec
 Cmte
 Meeting
 Fee


	 $40,000
	  	$	7,500	  	$	5,000	  	$	5,000	  	$	5,000	  	$	5,000	  	$	1,200	  	$	1,200	  	$	1,000	  	$	1,000	  	$	1,000	  	$	1,000

  
 Notes: 

	1)	Compensation schedule applies to outside Directors only. 


	2)	In-person and telephonic attendance by Directors at meetings will be compensated at the same amount. 


	3)	New Directors joining the Board will receive 1,000 shares of restricted stock as an initial grant, with a one year vesting period. 


	4)	Continuing Directors receive a grant of 1,000 shares of restricted stock following the election of Directors at each annual meeting of shareholders, with a one year vesting period.
##### 



EXHIBIT (31.2)
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a/15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vought
Aircraft Industries,
Inc. (registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    (omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238);(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit
committee of the registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Lloyd R. SorensonLloyd R. SorensonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 549 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase, extend, and 

make permanent the above-the-line deduction for certain expenses of 

elementary and secondary school teachers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2007 

Mr. CAMP of Michigan (for himself, Mr. TANNER, and Ms. PRYCE of Ohio) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase, 

extend, and make permanent the above-the-line deduction 

for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school 

teachers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Teacher Tax Relief 

5 Act of 2007’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 549 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEDUCTION FOR CERTAIN EXPENSES OF SCHOOL 

2 TEACHERS. 

3 (a) INCREASE IN DEDUCTION.—Subparagraph (D) of 

4 section 62(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (re5 lating to certain trade and business deductions of employ6 ees) is amended by striking ‘‘$250’’ and inserting ‘‘$400’’. 

7 (b) PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES.— 

8 Subparagraph (D) of section 62(a)(2) of such Code is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘educator in connection’’ and all 

11 that follows and inserting ‘‘educator—’’, and 

12 (2) by inserting at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(i) by reason of the participation of 

14 the educator in professional development 

15 courses related to the curriculum in which 

16 the educator provides instruction or to the 

17 students for which the educator provides 

18 instruction, and 

19 ‘‘(ii) in connection with books, sup20 plies (other than nonathletic supplies for 

21 courses of instruction in health or physical 

22 education), computer equipment (including 

23 related software and services) and other 

24 equipment, and supplementary materials 

25 used by the eligible educator in the class26 room.’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 549 IH

1 (c) PERMANENT DEDUCTION.—Subparagraph (D) of 

2 section 62(a)(2) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘In 

3 the case of taxable years beginning during 2002, 2003, 

4 2004, 2005, 2006, or 2007, the deductions’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘The deductions’’. 

6 (d) ELIGIBLE EDUCATOR TECHNICAL AMEND7 MENT.—Subparagraph (A) of section 62(d)(1) of such 

8 Code is amended by inserting ‘‘ending during the taxable 

9 year’’ before the period. 

10 (e) EFFECTIVE DATE.— 

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

12 subsections (a), (b), and (c) shall apply to taxable 

13 years beginning after December 31, 2006. 

14 (2) TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.—The amendment 

15 made by subsection (d) shall apply to taxable years 

16 beginning after December 31, 2001. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 514 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 514

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 6, 2007

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 16150 Aviation Loop Drive in Brooksville, Florida, as the ``Sergeant 
      Lea Robert Mills Brooksville Aviation Branch Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT LEA ROBERT MILLS BROOKSVILLE AVIATION BRANCH POST 
              OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 16150 Aviation Loop Drive in Brooksville, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sergeant Lea Robert Mills Brooksville 
Aviation Branch Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Lea Robert Mills Brooksville Aviation Branch Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 5, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeff Adams, Also Known as Jeffrey Allen, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 841]

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County (Bonnie Wittner, J.), rendered on or about April 23, 2004, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833 [1976]). We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to Criminal Procedure Law § 460.20, defendant *812may apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within 30 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the judge or justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other judge or justice. Concur— Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
## 2002 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

9-25-2002 

# Ambr o se v . R obinson

P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de n t i al

D ock e t N o . 01-1871

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2002

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2002 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" Ambr os e v

. R o b in s on " (2002). 2002 D e cisio n s

. P a pe r 611. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w
. v i l l a no v a
. e du/thir dc ir c uit_2002/611

### PRECEDENTIAL

Filed September 25, 2002

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Nos. 01-1871 and 01-3229

TERRY L. AMBROSE,

v.

TOWNSHIP OF ROBINSON, PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

(D.C. No. 99-cv-01218) District Judge: The Honorable Donetta W. Ambrose

Argued April 30, 2002

BEFORE: NYGAARD, ROTH, and WEIS, Circuit Judge s.

ORDER AMENDING SLIP OPINION

IT IS ORDERED that the slip opinion in the above case, filed on September 4, 2002, be amended as follows:

Counsel shall be listed as follows:

David P. Helwig, Esq. (Argued) Marks, O’Neill, O’Brien & Courtney 707 Grant Street 3200 Gulf Tower Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Counsel for Appellant, Township of Robinson, PA

Samuel P. Kamin, Esq. Goldberg, Kamin & Garvin 437 Grant Street, 1806 Frick Building Pittsburgh, PA 15219 Counsel for Appellant, Township of Robinson

Joseph H. Chivers, III, Esq. (Argued) Suite 600 312 Boulevard of the Allies Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Counsel for Appellee, Terry L. Ambrose

And, the second reference to 42 U.S.C. S 1983 on page 5 should be changed to 42 U.S.C. S 1988.

By the Court,

### /s/Richard L. NygaardCircuit Judge

Dated: September 25, 2002

A True Copy: Teste:
Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T M I CH A EL J O H N BU RRO W S, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 73883 A ge nc yN o. A 013- 016- 711 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , T A L L M A N , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M i c ha e l J ohn B urr ow s , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of C ana da , pe t i t i ons pr o s e f or r e v ie w o f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ’ ( “B I A ” ) o r d e rd e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n an dr e i s s u e i t s p r i o rd e c i s i o n . O u rj u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U . S. C. § 1252. W e r e vi e w f

orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of m ot i ons t o r e ope n, and 

# FI LED OC T 26 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 73883 2 r e v ie w d e n o v o du e p r o c e s s c la im s . I tu rr i b a rr i a v . I

NS , 3 2 1 F .3 d8 8 9 , 8 9 4 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) . We d e n yi n p artan dd i s m i s s i n p artth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng B urrow s’ m ot i on t o reopen be c aus e the m ot i on w a s f i l e d m or e than tw o y e ar s a f t e rthe B I A ’ s A pr i l 19, 2005, o r d e r , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 2 ) ( m o tio n to r e o p e n m u s t g e n e r a llyb e f ile dw ith in 90 day s of

the f i na l or de r ) , and B urr ow s f a i l e d t o e s t abl i s h tha the a c t e d w i th the du e d ilig e n c e r e q u ir e df o re q u itab le to llin g , se e I tu rr ib a rr ia , 321 F . 3d a t894 ( de a dl i ne c an be e qui t abl e t ol l e d “ w he n ape t i t i one ri s pr e ve nt e d f r om f i l i ng be c aus e of

de c e pt i on, f

r aud, ore rr or , a s l ong a s the pe t i t i one ra c t s w i th due d ilig e n c e ” ) . T o the e xt e ntB urr ow s s e e ks r e vi e w of the B I A ’ s A pr i l 19, 2005, de c i s i on denyi ng hi s und er l yi ng appeal , w e l ac k j uri sdi ct i on because thi s pet i t i on for r evi ew is n o t tim e lya s to th a t o r d e r . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( b ) ( 1 ) ; see a l so S i n gh v . I

NS , 315 F .3 d1 1 8 6 , 1 1 8 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 3 ) . W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w the B I A ’ s de c i s i on nott o i nvoke i t s s ua s p o n te au th o r ityto r e o p e n p r o c e e d in g s u n d e r8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( a ) . See Ekim i an v. I NS , 3 0 3 F .3 d1 1 5 3 , 1 1 5 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D in p a r t ; D I S M I S S E D in p a r t .08- 73883 3
IN RE KNOTT

No. COA05-1173

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Property Tax Commission (02PTC389).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.