alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012318EN.01000301.xml

| 15.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1068/2012

of 30 October 2012

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Aceituna Aloreña de Málaga (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Aceituna Aloreña de Málaga’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Aceituna Aloreña de Málaga’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 69, 7.3.2012, p. 10.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

SPAIN

Aceituna Aloreña de Málaga (PDO)

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 6, 2022

No. 04-22-00427-CV

Chris Noel CARLIN,

Appellant

v.

BEXAR COUNTY, Bexar County Judge Nelson W. Wolff, Judge Ron Rangel, and Judge Rosie 

Alvarado,

Appellees

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CI10840

Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On December 5, 2022, appellee filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file 

appellee’s brief. The motion was opposed.1 Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is 

due no later than February 6, 2023.

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

1 But see The Texas Lawyer’s Creed–A Mandate for Professionalism, reprinted in TEXAS RULES OF COURT 865, at 

¶ III.6 (West 2012). (“I will agree to reasonable requests for extensions of time . . .”).

FILE COPY
THE KNIGHT PUBLISHING CO. d/b/a the Charlotte Observer v. THE CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSPITAL AUTHORITY d/b/a Carolinas Healthcare System.

No. 549P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Mark J. Prak, Marcus W. Trathen, Charles E. Coble, Raleigh, for the Charlotte Observer.

*300Mark W. Merritt, Blake W. Thomas, Charlotte, for Charlotte Hospital.

Linwood L. Jones, General Counsel, Raleigh, for NC Hospital Assoc.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of September 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
IN RE S.R.L.

No. COA04-1707.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from New Hanover (03J387).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
NUMBER 13-13-00358-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

BONNIE DOWNS, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, The State of Texas, has filed an appeal. Upon suggestion of death of 

appellee’s retained attorney, Randy Mack, we now ABATE this appeal to provide 

appellee with the opportunity to seek new counsel. This appeal is ordered ABATED until 

October 28, 2013. 
2

Appellee is directed to notify the Court, on or before October 28, 2013, if he has

retained new counsel by filing a notice including that attorney’s name, mailing address, 

telephone number, facsimile number, and State Bar of Texas identification number. See 

generally TEX. R. APP. P. 6. 

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

1st day of October, 2013.
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF JEFFERY M. JACKSON

On this day, Sabre Holdings Corporation (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2005 (the "Report").

This
written statement accompanied the Report.

I,
Jeffery M. Jackson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|/s/Jeffery M. JacksonJeffery M. Jackson
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
March 8, 2006 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5478 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To provide for the continued minting and issuance of certain 

$1 coins in 2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That clause (i) of section 5112(n)(1)(B) of title 31, 

4 United States Code (as in effect on the day before the 

5 date of the enactment of Public Law 110–82) shall 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

HR 5478 RFS 

1 continue in effect, notwithstanding the amendment made 

2 by section 3 of Public Law 110–82, until the effective date 

3 of the amendment made by section 2 of such Public Law. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 25, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE v. Donald Ray WILLIAMS.

No. 519P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of September 2005 by Defendant for "Petition for Writ of Certiorari":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of November 2005."
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telanetix, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




(a)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(b)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 11, 2010
/s/ Douglas N. JohnsonDouglas N. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
#### In the Matter of Karen E. Meinzer, an Attorney, Respondent. Grievance Committee of the Eighth Judicial District, Petitioner.

[801 NYS2d 171]

Order of suspension entered. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.
In the Senate of the United States, 

May 6, 2008. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 5493) entitled ‘‘An Act to provide that the usual 

day for paying salaries in or under the House of Representatives may be established by regulations of the Committee on 

House Administration.’’, do pass with the following

AMENDMENT:

At the end of the bill, insert the following:

1 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT RELATING TO SENATE 

2 PAY PERIODS. 

3 (a) TITLE 18.—Section 207(e)(7) of title 18, United 

4 States Code, is amended—

5 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘at least 60 

6 days’’ and inserting ‘‘more than 2 months’’; and 

7 (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘at least 60 

8 days’’ and inserting ‘‘more than 2 months’’. 

9 (b) SENATE RULES.—Paragraph 9(c) of rule XXXVII 

10 of the Standing Rules of the Senate is amended by striking 
2

•HR 5493 EAS 

1 ‘‘more than 60 days in a calendar year’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘more than 2 months, in the aggregate, during the 1-year 

3 period before that former officer’s or employee’s service as 

4 such officer or employee was terminated’’.

Attest:

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 5493

AMENDMENT
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-20-00126-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

Trial Court No. 096-307382-19

Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE LISA TREVINO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF 

MARCUS CONTRERAS, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and verified 

appendix and is of the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, Relator’s

petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: April 29, 2020
98 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Scientific Research Corp. $139.2 M

Unaka Corp. $137.1 M

Detyens Shipyards $131.3 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $119.8 M

KBR $107.1 M

SAIC $98.5 M

Lockheed Martin $89.4 M

Atlas Technologies, Inc. $71.0 M

Chas Kurz & Co. $55.6 M

US Foods Holding $48.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

SOUTH CAROLINA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.0 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

65,493

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Richland 9,597 3,360 3,518 2,026 18,501

Charleston 3,851 4,818 878 2,969 12,516

Beaufort 9,943 1,198 122 42 11,305

Berkeley 6,829 300 150 ND ND

Sumter 5,705 829 131 164 6,829

Greenville 54 244 542 805 1,645

Spartanburg 22 11 232 168 433

York ND 20 231 159 ND

Anderson ND ND 388 0 ND

Orangeburg ND 21 127 222 ND

Construction: 7% Research and

Development: 2%

Service: 67%

Supplies and

Equipment: 24%

Active Duty: 57% Civilian: 17%

National 

Guard: 16%

Reserve: 10%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

18%

50%

19%

14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

40%

36%

22%

2%

$2.2 $2.5 $2.4

$2.9 $2.9 $2.8 $2.9 $3.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#26 #21 1.1% $1,186 #28 #27 #10 #16

$6.3 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.1% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$3.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

65,493 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.0 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$93.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 99

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

SOUTH CAROLINA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Charleston

Berkeley

Sumter

Richland

Greenville

Beaufort

Marion

Lexington

Dorchester

Spartanburg

(M = millions)

$1.3 B

$417.1 M

$368.3 M

$292.8 M

$198.3 M

$182.9 M

$137.1 M

$74.8 M

$44.2 M

$31.1 M

Charleston

Richland

Sumter

Berkeley

Beaufort

Greenville

Anderson

York

Florence

Spartanburg

$827.9 M

$742.8 M

$464.8 M

$430.0 M

$325.6 M

$49.4 M

$19.7 M

$12.5 M

$11.5 M

$10.9 M

Greenville

Spartanburg

Richland

Sumter Lexington

Marion

Berkeley

Dorchester

Charleston

Beaufort

Richland

Sumter

Florence

Berkeley

Charleston

Beaufort

Greenville

Spartanburg

Anderson

York
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 6, 2022 No. 04-22-00427-CV Chris Noel CARLIN , Appellant
v. BEXAR COUNTY , Bexar County Judge Nelson W. Wolff, Judge Ron Rangel, and Judge Rosie Alvarado, Appellees From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CI10840 Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On December 5, 2022, appellee filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file appellee’s brief. The motion was opposed. 1 Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief is due no later than February 6, 2023
.

_________________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 6th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

1 But see The Texas Lawyer’s Creed–A Mandate for Professionalism, reprinted in T EXAS R ULES OF C OURT 865, at ¶ III.6 (West 2012). (“I will agree to reasonable requests for extensions of time . . .”).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5528 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5528

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 2008

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 120 Commercial Street in Brockton, Massachusetts, as the ``Rocky 
                    Marciano Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROCKY MARCIANO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 120 Commercial Street in Brockton, Massachusetts, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Rocky Marciano Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Rocky 
Marciano Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
STATE v. Wali Farad Muhammad BILAL.

No. 292P03-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of April 2005 by Defendant for Petition for Discretionary Review under G.S. 7A-31:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of December 2005."
Order entered April 13, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00344-CV

DIANA FAY BASS, Appellant

V.

RICHARD H. BASS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-54722-2015

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 6, 2016 motion for an extension of time to file a 

brief. The record in this case has not been filed and is due on May 16, 2016. Appellant’s brief 

will be due thirty days after the later of the date the clerk’s record is filed or the date the 

reporter’s record is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s 

motion as premature.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Agreement between China Satellite Communication Corp. and WorldSpace Inc.



 Exhibit 10.9(f) 
  
 AGREEMENT 
  
 China Satellite Communications Corporation (hereinafter as “ChinaSat”), a corporation registered under the laws of the People’s Republic of
China, and WorldSpace Inc. (hereinafter as “WorldSpace), registered under the laws of the United States, have had friendly discussions and reached the following agreement as of July 18th, 2005: 
  

	 	(1)	Both parties agree to extend the “August 8 Agreements” (including the Cooperation Agreement on Technial and Commercial Trial Operation of
WorldSpace L-Band Satellite Multimedia Services, Agency Agreement, Agreement for WorldSpace’s Contribution to ChinaSat of the Satellite Uplink Systems, and Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Cooperation
Project Between ChinaSat & WorldSpace signed as of August 8, 2000 and the Supplementary Agreement signed as of April 2, 2001) to December 31, 2005. 

  

	 	(2)	Both parties agree to negotiate further extension issues of the “August 8 Agreements” at least before 60 days of expiration. 


  

	 	(3)	WorldSpace agrees to immediately begin expansion of the uplink station in Beijing in consideration of ChinaSat agreeing to extent the “August 8 Agreements”
for an additional Five (5) years. 

  

	 	(4)	This agreement has 4 copies, 2 in English and 2 in Chinese. Both of which are equally authentic. 

  

							
	 China Satellite Communications Corporation
	 	 	 	 WorldSpace Inc.

	 By:
	 	 China Satellite Navigation and Communication Co. Ltd
	 	 	 	 /s/ Mike Ma

	 	 	 /s/ Lu Ziping
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 [official chop of China Satellite Navigation and Communication Co., Ltd.]
	 	 	 	 








 Power of Attorney 
  
 No: 2005 Zi No. 70 
  
 To: WorldSpace, Inc. 
  
 I, Zhang Hainan, as the legal representative of China Satellite Communication Corporation, an enterprise incorporated under the law of the
People’s Republic of China, hereby authorize China Satellite Navigation and Communication Co., Ltd. to execute an extension agreement with WorldSpace, Inc. with respect to the business of leasing Northeast Beam AsiaStar channels both
inside and outside of China, and to execute any other related legal documents. The rights and obligations under such extension agreement and any other related legal documents will be enjoyed and assumed by China Satellite Communication Corporation.

  
 This power of attorney will be effective from May 26,
2005 and be valid for a period of six months. 
  

			
	 Leal Representative:
	 	[signature of Zhang Hainan]
	 	 	[official chop of China Satellite Communication
	 	 	 Corporation]
		
	 Position:
	 	 General Manager
		
	 Authorized unit:
	 	[official chop of China Satellite Navigation and Communication  Co., Ltd.]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7065

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:15-cr-00462-JKB-2)

Submitted: November 9, 2021 Decided: November 12, 2021

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen appeals the district court’s order denying relief on 

his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Aigbekaen, No. 1:15-cr-00462-JKB-2 (D. Md. Aug. 11, 2020). We deny as moot 

the Government’s motion to dissolve abeyance, and we deny Aigbekaen’s motions for 

mandamus, for fees, to intervene in a prison matter, for acquittal, to reverse the district 

court’s detention order, to expedite and for immediate release, to dismiss his sex trafficking 

conviction, for resentencing, and to supplement. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.2



                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$6,800,000                                                     July 29, 2005
                                                               Fort Worth, Texas

Miles Investment Group, LLC, a Texas limited liability company,  ("Undersigned")
hereby  promises to pay on, or before  September 15, 2010, to the order of Urban
Television  Network  Corporation,  a Nevada corporation (the "Payee") the sum of
Six Million Eight Hundred Thousand ($6,800,000) Dollars, at the rate of $250,000
Dollars every thirty days,  including zero (0%) percent interest,  until paid in
full.  The  first  payment  will be due on, or before  September  15,  2005 with
successive  payments due every thirty (30) days thereafter,  until paid in full.
This note is secured by the pledge of  69,000,000  restricted  common  shares of
Urban Television Network Corporation.

If not so paid as scheduled,  all  principal and interest,  at the option of the
Holder, or its assigns, shall become immediately due and payable.

The  Undersigned  shall have the privilege of prepaying the principal under this
Note in whole or in part,  without  penalty or premium at any time. All payments
hereunder  shall be applied first to interest,  then to principal,  then to late
charges.

The Undersigned shall pay upon demand any and all expenses, including reasonable
attorney  fees,  incurred or paid by Holder without suit or action in attempting
to collect  funds due under this Note.  In the event an action is  instituted to
enforce or interpret any of the terms of this Note  including but not limited to
any action or  participation by Undersigned in, or in connection with, a case or
proceeding  under the Bankruptcy Code or any successor  statute,  the prevailing
party shall be entitled to recover all expenses  reasonably  incurred at, before
and after  trial,  on appeal,  and on review  whether  or not  taxable as costs,
including,   without  limitation,   attorney  fees,  witness  fees  (expert  and
otherwise), deposition costs, copying charges and other expenses.

Miles Investment Group, LLC
a Texas limited liability company


/s/ Jacob R. Miles III
------------------------------
By: Jacob R. Miles III
Title: Managing Member and President