alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **Global Green Solutions Inc.** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, **Doug Frater**, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 17th day of July, 2006.

 
DOUG FRATER 
Doug Frater 
Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5182 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5182

        To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentadecanolide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

   Mrs. Maloney of New York introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentadecanolide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CYCLOPENTADECANOLIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Cyclopentadecanoli  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          de (CAS No. 106-                                                   31/2011.......
                          02-5) (provided
                          for in subheading
                          2932.29.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
CITY OF CONCORD v. Alan R. STAFFORD, and wife Katherine L. Stafford.

No. 562P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

James E. Scarbrough, Concord, for Alan and Katherine Stafford.

Robert Cansler, Assistant City Attorney, Albert Benshoff, City Attorney, for City of Concord.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of October 2005 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
exv10w53



 







Exhibit 10.53




N e s t l é  s.a.




Dreyer’s Grand Ice

Cream Holdings, Inc.

5929 College Avenue

Oakland, CA 94618

U.S.A.

Attn. A. Romaneschi

Executive Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer



Vevey, December 6, 2004

FC-TREAS./BLP/nia



Re:
Bridge Loan Facility for up to USD 400 million dated
June 11, 2003 by and between Nestlé S.A.
and Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream Holdings, Inc., as amended



Dear Mr. Romaneschi,




As discussed, the referenced Bridge Loan Facility shall be amended, effective as of
December 3, 2004, by replacing in its entirety the Amount of Loan paragraph with the
following:



	 	 	 
	Amount
of Loan
	 	 : Up to a maximum amount of USD
6S0’000’000. —
   (six hundred
fifty million U.S. dollars) (the “Loan”).






All other terms and conditions of the referenced Bridge Loan Facility are unchanged by this
amendment letter and remain in full force and effect.



Please indicate your agreement by signing and returning to us the attached copy of this
amendment letter.



Yours sincerely,



Nestlé S.A.








							
	AVENUE NESTLÉ 55
	 	CH- 1 800 VEVEY (SUISSE)
	 	TÉLÉPHONE 021 924 21 11
	 	TÉLÉFAX 021 921 18 85
In the Matter of T.D.P.

No. 310A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 24, 2004.

John Campbell, Fayetteville, for Cumberland Co. DSS.

Stuart A. Brock, Winston-Salem, Robin Weaver-Hurmence, Fayetteville, for Guardian ad Litem.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th day of August 2004 by Respondent for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Respondent shall have up to and including the 2nd day of September 2004 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of August 2004."
THETFORD PROPERTIES III LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A Beaumont Avenue Apartments, by and Through its Agent Thetford Property Management, Inc. v. Richard MILLER.

No. 175P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

William K. Brownlee, Raleigh, for Thetford Properties, et al.

Richard A. Miller, Sr., Pro Se.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 1st day of April 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*636"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
Exhibit
        10.43.1

      


      


      Incentive
        and Performance Compensation

      Pursuant
        to
        2005 Financial Performance

      


      In
        addition to base salary, senior management, including executive officers,
        participate in various annual performance incentive programs. These programs
        are
        part of our comprehensive Incentive and Performance Plan which was approved
        by
        shareholders in May 2004. The programs are designed to focus management’s
        efforts on our objectives, provide appropriate rewards that are consistent
        with
        financial performance and align incentive compensation with the interests
        of
        shareholders.

      


      
        	·  	
                The
                  incentive
                  plan for senior management, including executive officers, is based
                  on 70%
                  of consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
                  amortization (EBITDA) and 30% on the return on net investment (RONI).
                  Payout ranges are established each year by the Compensation Committee
                  and
                  may range from 0% to 200% of base salary. Additionally, the Compensation
                  Committee may award participants discretionary
                  bonuses.

              


      

      


      
        	·  	
                The
                  incentive
                  plan for senior management of BMC West is equally based on the
                  segment’s
                  (EBITA); the segment’s lease adjusted return on net investment (RONI) and
                  consolidated EBITDA. Payout ranges are established each year by
                  the
                  Compensation Committee and may range from 0% to 180% of base salary.
                  Additionally, the Compensation Committee may award participants
                  discretionary bonuses.

              


      

      


      
        	·  	
                The
                  incentive
                  plan for senior management of BMC Construction is based on 70%
                  of the
                  segment’s EBITA and economic profit and the remaining 30% is based on
                  consolidated EBITA and economic profit. The size of the potential
                  incentive pool is evaluated annually and payouts are based on the
                  participant’s contribution to financial performance. Additionally, the
                  Compensation Committee may award participants discretionary bonuses.
Exhibit 10.1(b)


         Schedule of Secured Convertible Note (new financing) Issued by
               NCT Group, Inc. to Carole Salkind on July 26, 2005


                                                                   Conversion
      Issue Date           Due Date             Principal             Price
      ----------           --------             ---------             -----
       07/26/05            01/26/06            $  350,000            $ 0.01
Exhibit 21.1

MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.  LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                            |  | STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|MarkWest Michigan, Inc.                       |  | Colorado                                                    
|MarkWest Resources, Inc.                      |  | Colorado                                                    
|Matrex, LLC                                   |  | Michigan                                                    
|MarkWest Energy Partners, L.P.                |  | Delaware                                                    
|MarkWest Energy GP, L.L.C.                    |  | Delaware                                                    
|MarkWest Energy Operating Company, L.L.C.     |  | Delaware                                                    
|West Shore Processing Company, LLC            |  | Michigan                                                    
|Basin Pipeline LLC                            |  | Michigan                                                    
|MarkWest Energy Appalachia, L.L.C.            |  | Delaware                                                    
|MarkWest Texas GP, L.L.C.                     |  | Delaware                                                    
|MW Texas Limited, L.L.C.                      |  | Delaware                                                    
|MarkWest Michigan Pipeline Company, L.L.C.    |  | Michigan                                                    
|MarkWest Western Oklahoma Gas Company, L.L.C. |  | Oklahoma                                                    
|MarkWest Power Tex L.P.                       |  | Texas                                                       
|MarkWest Pinnacle L.P.                        |  | Texas                                                       
|MarkWest Texas PNG Utility L.P.               |  | Texas                                                       
|MarkWest Blackhawk L.P.                       |  | Texas                                                       

---

QuickLinks
H. R. 5517 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7231 FM 

1960 in Humble, Texas, as the ‘‘Texas Military Veterans Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. TEXAS MILITARY VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 7231 FM 1960 in Humble, Texas, shall be known 

and designated as the ‘‘Texas Military Veterans Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Texas Military Veterans Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
In the Matter of B.I., Minor Child. appealed by Respondent.

No. 43P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

Winifred H. Dillon, Raleigh, for Hester I.

*848John Adams, for Buncombe County DSS.

Judy Rudolph, for Guardian Ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of January 2006 by Respondent (Heather I.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York,<br><br>against<br><br>Delight Bvunzawabaya, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered March 11, 2013, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of unlawful solicitation in the subway, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Larry R.C. Stephen, J.), rendered March 11, 2013, affirmed.</p><p>The accusatory instrument was not jurisdictionally defective. Sworn police allegations that defendant was observed in a specified subway station, "approach[ing] and solicit[ing] a MetroCard swipe from several passengers by stating (in substance): Can you swipe me in?," and that defendant lacked permission or authority to solicit entry into the subway system, were sufficiently evidentiary in character (<i>People v Allen</i>, 92 NY2d 378, 385 [1998]) to establish that defendant panhandled in a subway facility in violation of New York City Transit Authority Rule [21 NYCRR] § 1050.6(b)(2).</p><br>The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348—349 [2007]). The credibility issues raised by defendant were properly placed before the trier of fact and, after considering the relative force of the conflicting testimony and the competing inferences that may be drawn therefrom, we find no reason to disturb the court's determination to credit the arresting officer's testimony rather than defendant's.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.<br>I concurI concurI concur<p>Decision Date: September 17, 2018</p><br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
STATE v. BAILEY.

No. COA04-1147.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Forsyth (01CRS23270, 01CRS55971, 01CRS56418, 01CRS56420, 01CRS56422, 01CRS56423, 01CRS56425).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed; remanded for correction of judgment.
In the Matter of J.B.C., Minor Child.

No. 217P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Robert W. Combs, Sr., Pro Se, for Combs.

Dorothy Combs, Pro Se, Kathleen M. Widelski, for J.B.C.

Amy Zacharia, for Guardian Ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner (Robert and Dorothy Combs) on the 22nd day of April 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
EXHIBIT 99.1


                         SARBANES-OXLEY ACT CERTIFICATION
                         --------------------------------

I, Jerry Braun, certify that:

1.     I  have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of New York Health Care,
Inc.;

2.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.     Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial statements, and other financial
information  included  in  this  annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in  this annual report;

4.     The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-14)  for  the  registrant  and  we  have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  known  to  us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  quarterly  report  is  being  prepared;

     b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of  a  date  within  90  days  prior  to the filing date of this
quarterly  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

     c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of  the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation  Date;

5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing  the equivalent
function):

     a)  all  significant  deficiencies  in  the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have  identified for the
registrant's  auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

     b)  any  fraud,  whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


                                       79
<PAGE>
6.     The  registrant's  other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether  or  not  there  were significant changes in internal
controls  or  in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent  to  the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions  with  regard  to  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.

Dated:  March 17, 2003

By:
Jerry Braun
Chief Executive Officer


                                       80
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5414 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5414

      To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphorus Thiochloride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2008

Mr. Etheridge introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To suspend temporarily the duty on Phosphorus Thiochloride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PHOSPHORUS THIOCHLORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Phosphorus          Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          Thiochloride (CAS                                                  31/2011.......
                          No. 3982-91-0)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          2853.00.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5191 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to carry out the highway project 

known as the ‘‘Trans-Texas Corridor’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to carry out the 

highway project known as the ‘‘Trans-Texas Corridor’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS FOR 

4 TRANS-TEXAS CORRIDOR PROJECT. 

5 No Federal funds appropriated or made available be6 fore, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act may 

7 be used by a unit of Federal, State, or local government 

8 to carry out the highway project known as the ‘‘Trans9 Texas Corridor’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT GEOLOGIST


 



I have reviewed Hurley Exploration Inc. Form SB-2/A filing, I hereby provide my
consent for the reference to my reports on the DON Mineral Claims in Lillooet
Mining District British Columbia. I hereby consent to the use of my name as a
consultant to the Company.


 


/s/  John Nicholson  


John Nicholson P. Geo.


 


July 11, 2005
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Dex Media West LLC as of the dates and for
the periods expressed in the Report.
 /s/ David C. Swanson
    
    /s/ Steven M. BlondyDavid C. Swanson
    
    Steven M. BlondyChairman of the Board of Directors and
    
    Executive Vice President andChief Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial OfficerNovember 6, 2009
    
    November 6, 2009
II 

Calendar No. 848 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5517 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 16, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 25, 2008 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7231 FM 1960 in Humble, Texas, as the 

‘‘Texas Military Veterans Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TEXAS MILITARY VETERANS POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 7231 FM 1960 in Humble, 

6 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Texas Mili7 tary Veterans Post Office’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5517 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Texas Military Vet5 erans Post Office’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Calendar No. 848 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5517 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postfice’’. Texas, as the ‘‘Texas Military Veterans Post Of- al Service located at 7231 FM 1960 in Humble, 

JUNE 25, 2008 

Reported without amendment 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS