alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Gregg A. Ostrander, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants third
fiscal quarter of 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2007



/s/ Gregg A. OstranderGregg A. OstranderChairman and Chief Executive Officer
exv10w6



 







Exhibit 10.6




Tekelec




Summary of Compensation Arrangements

for Named Executive Officers




     Set forth below is a summary of the compensation paid by Tekelec (the “Company”) to the
executive officers of the Company who were named in the Summary Compensation Table appearing in the
Proxy Statement relating to the Company’s 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and who are currently
employees of the Company (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”).



     Base Salaries. As approved on April 7, 2005 by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s
Board of Directors (and as recommended by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of
Directors in the case of the Chief Executive Officer and President), effective January 1, 2005, the
Named Executive Officers receive base salaries at the annual rates indicated below:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Name and Position	 	2005 Annual Base Salary Rate
	Frederick M. Lax, Chief Executive Officer and President
	 	$	525,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Ronald W. Buckly, Senior Vice President, Corporate Affairs
and General Counsel
	 	$	305,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	
Lori Craven, Executive Vice President, Global Sales,
Marketing and Customer Services
	 	$	350,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	
Debra May, President and General Manager, IEX Corporation
	 	$	252,500	 






     The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (and the Board of Directors upon
recommendation of the Compensation Committee in the case of the Chief Executive Officer and
President) may from time to time adjust the foregoing base salaries. Such adjustments are
generally made annually.



     Incentive Awards. The Named Executive Officers are eligible to participate in the Company’s
cash and equity incentive compensation plans pursuant to the terms of such plans. Such plans are
included as exhibits to the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



     Other Compensation. Named Executive Officers who elect to participate in the Company’s 401(k)
Plan are entitled to receive certain Company matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan. The
Company also pays premiums for group term life insurance for the benefit of the Named Executive
Officers. Named Executive Officers are also eligible to receive such other compensation as may
from time to time be determined by the Compensation Committee or by the Board of Directors, as
applicable.



* * *
STATE v. Rashawn D. YARRELL.

No. 448PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 22, 2005.

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Rashawn D. Yarrell.

Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of November 2005 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 30th day of December 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of November 2005."
STATE of North Carolina v. Harold BOYD, Jr.

No. 588P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Jeffrey Evan Noecker, Wilmington, for Harold Boyd, Jr.

Harold Boyd, Jr., Pro Se.

Robert T. Hargett, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th day of November 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
Exhibit 4.08      CONSENT OF PAUL ARCHER   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2013 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Paul Archer, participated in the preparation of the technical reports entitled Technical Report and Recommendations, Reconnaissance and Trenching Program, Ashuanipi Project, Québec completed in March 2012 (the Report), concerning mineralized material in the Ashuanipi property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings Item III  Description of the Business  3.6.4 Geological Setting; 3.6.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.6.6 Mineralization in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2013 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,     /S/ Paul ArcherName:
Paul Archer, M.Sc., P.Eng.   May 13, 2013
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 6, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-151 Lower Tribunal No. 22-7472

________________ 

### MCZ Centrum Flamingo II, LLC, et al.,

Appellants,
vs. 

### Flamingo/South Beach I Condominium Association, Inc., Appellee. An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge. Gelber Schachter & Greenberg, P.A., Gerald E. Greenberg, and Christopher S. Sundby; Podhurst Orseck, P.A., Stephen F. Rosenthal, and Christina H. Martinez, for appellants. Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Jared A. Levy (West Palm Beach), and Valerie C. David (Orlando), for appellee. Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
Exhibit 99


June 27, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0408

Re: Arthur Andersen

The purpose of this letter is to address the requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Commission") with respect to issuers that include
accountants' reports from Arthur Andersen, LLP ("Andersen") issued after March
14, 2002 in filings with the Commission.

In connection with the audit of the consolidated financial statements of SIUK
plc and Subsidiaries (the "Company") as of March 31, 2002, and for the year
ended, Andersen has issued a report to the Company dated June 27, 2002. The
report is included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2002.

In accordance with the requirements of the Commission, the Company has received
the following written representation from Andersen:

         Arthur Andersen, LLP has audited the consolidated financial statements
         SIUK plc and Subsidiaries as of March 31, 2002 and for the year ended,
         and have issued our report thereon dated June 27, 2002. We represent
         that this audit was subject to our quality control system for the U.S.
         accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that
         the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards,
         that there was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel
         working on the audit, availability of national office consultation, and
         availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen to conduct
         the relevant portions of the audit.


SIUK plc


---------------
Richard F. Owen
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.1


 


Schedule of Director
Compensation


 


On July 27, 2005, the
Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Security Capital Corporation (the “Company”)
approved the following compensation arrangements for the directors of the
Company, other than Mr. Brian Fitzgerald, Chairman of the Board, President
and CEO, and Mr. A. George Gebauer, Vice Chairman of the Board and
Secretary:


 


	
  Board of Directors Fees

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Annual Board Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  15,000

  	
   

  
	
  Board Meeting Attendance Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Audit Committee Fees

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Additional Annual Fee for Chairperson

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  20,000

  	
   

  
	
  Additional Annual Fee for Other Members

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  5,000

  	
   

  
	
  Committee Meeting Attendance Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation Committee Fees

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Additional Annual Fee for Chairperson

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  8,000

  	
   

  
	
  Additional Annual Fee for Other Members

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  5,000

  	
   

  
	
  Committee Meeting Attendance Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Special Committee Fees

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Additional Annual Fee for Chairperson

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  16,000

  	
   

  
	
  Additional Annual Fee for Other Member

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  12,000

  	
   

  
	
  Committee Meeting Attendance Fee

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  



 


Annual fees are prorated for
those directors not serving in the position for the full year.  In additional to fees, each director, other
than Messrs. Fitzgerald and Gebauer, is granted, on the date of his initial
election to the Board, an option to purchase 24,000 shares of Class A
Common Stock of the Company, at an exercise price equal to the fair market
value per share on the date of grant. 
The options are not transferable other than upon death, are exercisable
in three equal annual installments commencing on the date of grant, and expire at
the earlier of the termination of the director’s directorship or ten years from
the date of grant.


 


Finally, directors are
reimbursed for their reasonable expenses in connection with attendance at Board
and committee meetings.  Other than
reimbursement of expenses, Messrs. Fitzgerald and Gebauer receive no
additional compensation for serving as directors of the Company.


 


1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZHONGPIN INC. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Xianfu Zhu, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


Date:    August 10, 2006                        By: /s/ Xianfu Zhu
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Xianfu Zhu
                                                    Chief Executive Officer


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
108 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

General Dynamics $185.2 M

Raytheon Technologies $49.6 M

Marvell Technology, Inc. $47.8 M

IBM $8.4 M

Omni Medical Systems $6.8 M

Omni Measurement Systems $4.6 M

University of Vermont & State Agricultural College $4.4 M

Norwich University $3.4 M

Galvion $2.8 M

Mobile Virtual Player, LLC $2.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

VERMONT

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$170.9 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

3,802

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Chittenden 69 494 2,195 ND ND

Washington 37 11 248 0 296

Rutland ND ND 80 78 ND

Windsor ND 17 62 75 ND

Franklin 0 ND 68 0 ND

Orange 0 0 72 0 72

Windham 0 ND 42 0 ND

Bennington 0 0 48 0 48

Orleans 0 0 46 0 46

Caledonia 0 ND 38 0 ND

Construction: 0% 

Research and Development: 3%

Service: 7%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 90%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

11%

59%

12%

18%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

64%

2%

33%

1%

$0.2

$0.3

$0.5 $0.5

$0.2

$0.4

$0.2

$0.3

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#51 #33 0.1% $853 #44 #49 #51 #51

$0.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.4% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

3,802 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$38.2 M GRANT 

SPENDING

Active Duty: 3%

Civilian: 15%

National Guard: 78%

Reserve: 4%
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 109

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Washington

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 VERMONT

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Chittenden

Addison

Washington

Orange

Windsor

Rutland

Orleans

Windham

Caledonia

Bennington

(M = millions)

$276.7 M

$50.5 M

$5.9 M

$3.1 M

$2.6 M

$1.5 M

$1.1 M

$740.6 K

$623.5 K

$77.1 K

Chittenden

Washington

Rutland

Windsor

Franklin

Orange

Orleans

Bennington

Caledonia

Windham

$130.2 M

$14.2 M

$5.6 M

$5.2 M

$3.3 M

$1.8 M

$1.8 M

$1.7 M

$1.6 M

$1.5 M

Orleans

Chittenden

Addison

Caledonia

Washington

Orange

Windsor

Rutland

Bennington

Franklin

Orleans

Chittenden

Windsor

Rutland

Caledonia

Bennington Windham

Windham

Orange
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 27, 2009

p0324 

# Order

March 27, 2009

137528

CRYSTAL LAKE PROPERTY RIGHTS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 137528 COA: 272587 Benzie CC: 04-007095-CE BENZIE COUNTY and DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 11, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

M ARKMAN , J. ( concurring ).

For the reasons set forth by the concurring judge in the Court of Appeals, I concur in this order. In particular, I agree with him that “after reading the entire plan, it seems

clear to me that the [Department of Natural Resources] is violating the spirit, intent, and purpose of the plan, albeit not the plain langua ge.” More should be expected of a public agency, in my judgment , when it negotiates with private parties than the kind of “sharp dealing” reflected in this case. However, any remedy, if there is to be one, must come from the political process, rath er than from this Court read ing an agreement in a manner contrary to its language.

C ORRIGAN , J., joins the statement of M ARKMAN , J.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 27, 2010

s0419 

# Order

April 27, 2010

140207

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140207 COA: 285730 Macomb CC: 2000-003516-FH; 2001-001413-FH ALAN EUGENE RHEA, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 10, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
IN RE K.B.

No. COA05-1162.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Forsyth (04J498)

Case without published opinion. Order affirmed; motion to dismiss denied.
EXHIBIT 10.26

| |  | Sabre Inc.
3150 Sabre Drive
Southlake, Texas 76092
| |  | --------------------------------------------------
| |  | Tel: (682) 605-10000                              

[LOGO]



Mr. William
J. Hannigan
5116 Glenview Court
Plano, Texas 75093



Dear
Bill:

At
the time you began employment with Sabre Inc., the Company's flexible benefits program limited base life insurance coverage to a maximum of $70,000. The Company agreed in your
Employment Agreement to provide you with a $250,000 supplemental life insurance policy through a split dollar life insurance program.

Notwithstanding
the Employment Agreement, the Company never provided you with split dollar life insurance. Instead, we agreed that the Company would provide you with supplemental term
life insurance. Your current policy is a Term Life Policy carried by Security Life of Denver Insurance Company.

On
January 1, 2001, Sabre began offering enhanced life insurance coverage under its flexible benefits program. Under the new program, the Company provides you with life insurance
coverage equal to 200% of your annual salary. You may also purchase supplemental life insurance coverage. These policies are subject to a combined maximum coverage of $2 million, with a maximum
guaranteed issue of $1.5 million.

These
enhanced life insurance offerings provide significantly greater benefits than the original level of coverage contemplated by your Employment Agreement. Accordingly, there is no
need for the Company to renew your current term life insurance policy on its December 14, 2002 expiration. Moreover, Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been construed to
limit Sabre's ability to provide executive officers with split dollar life insurance policies, as contemplated by the Employment Agreement.

Therefore,
as we discussed, Sabre will not renew your current term life insurance policy. You have the option of converting that policy to an individual policy through the carrier.
Furthermore, we hereby amend your Employment Agreement dated December 9, 1999 to delete the provision that requires the Company to provide you with a supplemental life insurance policy having a
face value of $250,000 through a split dollar life insurance program.

| | Sabre Inc.                                                                              
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                         
| | /s/MICHAEL E. HAEFNERBy: Michael E. Haefner
Title: Senior Vice PresidentHuman Resources

---

Agreed
to and accepted:

|                                          | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|/s/WILLIAM J. HANNIGANWilliam J. Hannigan | 

---

QuickLinks