alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 4.1  **

----

|   | PricewaterhouseCoopers      LLP/s.r.l./s.e.n.c.r.l.      Chartered Accountants      Place de la Cité, Tour Cominar      2640 Laurier Boulevard, Suite 1700      Québec, Quebec      Canada G1V 5C2      Telephone +1 (418) 522 7001      Facsimile +1 (418) 522 5663 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the use of our report dated May 14, 2007 with respect to the financial statements of Virginia Mines Inc. (successor to Virginia Gold Mines Inc.) included in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the twelve months ended February 28, 2007, the twelve months ended February 28, 2006 and the nine months ended February 28, 2005, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Chartered Accountants

Quebec, Quebec, CanadaMay 14, 2007

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLp ans the other member firms of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gerald R. Tuskey, Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.









May 10, 2005

/s/Gerald R. Tuskey



Date

Gerald R. Tuskey,

Chief Financial Officer and Director
Order entered June 29, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-18-00400-CV IN RE PRG DALLAS, ASC., L.P. Original Proceeding from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-04958



### ORDER Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Boatright Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we CONDITIONALLY GRANT relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We DIRECT the trial court to issue, w ithin twenty-one (21) days of the date of this opinion, a wr itten order quashing Daniel Ch ambers’ deposition until a party seeking such a deposition serves a Chapter 74 expert report. W e further ORDER the trial court to file with this Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, a certified copy of its order(s) issued in compliance with this order and with the Cour t’s opinion of this date. Should the trial court fail to comply with this order, the writ will i ssue. We ORDER real parties in interest Anne Looney, Jerry Shipley, and Professional Compoundi ng Centers of America to bear the costs, if any, of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE
Presidential Documents

42051 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 133 

Wednesday, July 13, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Proclamation 10422 of July 8, 2022 

Death of Abe Shinzo 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

The longest serving Prime Minister in Japan’s history, Abe Shinzo was 

a proud servant of the Japanese people and a faithful friend to the United 

States. He worked with American Presidents of both parties to deepen the 

Alliance between our nations and advance a common vision for a free 

and open Indo-Pacific. Even in the moment he was attacked and killed, 

he was engaged in the work of democracy, to which he dedicated his 

life. 

As a mark of respect for the memory of Abe Shinzo, former Prime Minister 

of Japan, by the authority vested in me as President of the United States 

by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby 

order that the flag of the United States shall be flown at half-staff at the 

White House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all military 

posts and naval stations, and on all naval vessels of the Federal Government 

in the District of Columbia and throughout the United States and its Territories and possessions until sunset, July 10, 2022. I also direct that the 

flag shall be flown at half-staff for the same length of time at all United 

States embassies, legations, consular offices, and other facilities abroad, including all military facilities and naval vessels and stations. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day 

of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-two, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fortyseventh. 

[FR Doc. 2022–15135 

Filed 7–12–22; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3395–F2–P 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PREZ DOC 1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32.2



GLOBAL SIGNAL INC.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Signal Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William T. Freeman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|/s/    WILLIAM T.
FREEMAN                        
|William T. Freeman                               
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



August 12, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
William T. Freeman and will be retained by Global Signal, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
STATE of North Carolina v. Toney CAUDLE.

No. 433P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 17, 2006.

Robert C. Montgomery, Jane Ammons Gilchrist, Assistant Attorney Generals, William Graham, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Kevin Patrick Bradley, Durham, for Toney Caudle.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of September 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
| 1. | The Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 12, 2011 | /s/ Carol K. Nelson                                                                                                                                |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | By:     Carol K. Nelson,President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)                                |
|                          |                                                                                                                                               |
| Date:  May 12, 2011 | /s/ Debra L. Johnson                                                                                                                               |
|                          | By:     Debra L. Johnson,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6746** 

METAPHYZIC EL

- ECTROMAGNETIC SUPREME

- EL, f/k/a Antoni o Edward McLean , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv - 00052

- REP

- RCY )

Submitted : July 21, 2015 Decided: July 24, 2015

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Metaphyzic El

- e c tromagnetic Supreme

- El, Appellant Pro Se. Alice Theresa Armstrong, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Metaphyzic El

- Ectromagnetic Supreme

- El seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order s accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition and denying his motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59 ( e ) . The order s are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a sub stantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S . 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Supreme

- El has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealab ility and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSE D
Exhibit 32.2

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF JEFFERY M. JACKSON

On this day, Sabre Holdings Corporation (the "Company") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ending December 31, 2003 (the "Report").

This
written statement accompanied the Report.

I,
Jeffery M. Jackson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that:



|/s/JEFFERY M. JACKSONJeffery M. Jackson
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
February 27, 2004 |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE CONCERNED CITIZENS OF ROSS

TOWNSHIP

v.

ROSS TOWNSHIP AND THE CATHOLIC

CEMETERIES ASSOCIATION OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH, INC.

PETITION OF: THE CATHOLIC

CEMETERIES ASSOCIATION OF THE DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGH, INC. :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 293 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of May, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of A REIT, Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended
    September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                          



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ SCOTT D. PETERS    
| |                        
| | Scott D. Peters        
| | Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 15, 2004

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document. The signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to A REIT, Inc. and will
be retained by A REIT, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2014076EN.01005601.xml

| 15.3.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 76/56 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/56

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2013/755/EU of 25 November 2013 on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Union (‘Overseas Association Decision’)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 344 of 19 December 2013, p. 1
  )

On page 24, Article 84(6):

for:

‘6.   The OCTs authorities and the Commission shall be jointly responsible for approving the programming document. The Commission shall approve the programming document following the procedure provided for in Article 86.’,

read:

‘6.   The OCTs authorities and the Commission shall be jointly responsible for approving the programming document. The Commission shall approve the programming document following the procedure provided for in Article 87.’;

on page 32, Annex II, Article 1(1)(c):

for:

‘EUR 8,5 million to studies or technical assistance measures in accordance with Article 80 of this Decision, and to an overall evaluation of the Decision to be made four years before it expires, at the latest.’,

read:

‘EUR 8,5 million to studies or technical assistance measures in accordance with Article 81 of this Decision, and to an overall evaluation of the Decision to be made four years before it expires, at the latest.’;

on page 64, Annex VI, Appendix II, Harmonised System Heading ex 0307, ‘Description of product’:

for:

‘Molluscs, whether in shell or not, dried, salted or in brine; aquatic invertebrates other than crustaceans and molluscs, dried, salted or in brine; flours, meals and pellets of crustaceans, fit for human consumption’,

read:

‘Molluscs, whether in shell or not, dried, salted or in brine; aquatic invertebrates other than crustaceans and molluscs, dried, salted or in brine; flours, meals and pellets of aquatic invertebrates other than crustaceans, fit for human consumption’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  balance sheet of MidAmerican  Energy Company as of June 30, 1999,
and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the six
months  ended June 30,  1999,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
 </LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000928576
<NAME>                        MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,624,734
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    210,930
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         232,310
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       279,489
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 166,221
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,513,684
<COMMON>                                       560,562
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            418,975
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 979,537
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          150,000
<PREFERRED>                                    31,759
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           759,784
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 149,900
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  170,773
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,271,931
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  3,513,684
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      846,589
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           30,449<F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     654,809
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     654,809
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        125,254
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (3,692)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 121,562
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       44,577
<NET-INCOME>                                   46,536
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    2,477
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  44,059
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       36,706
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      33,107
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         189,268
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1> Income Tax Expense includes operating and nonoperating income
taxes and is excluded from Total Operating Expenses above and on the
Consolidated Statement of Income.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION
(the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|      |  |                         
|----- |  | ------------------------
|      |  | /s/    RICHARD L.
PETEKA
|Name: |  | Richard L. Peteka       
|Date: |  | August 6, 2009