alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4



Exhibit 10.4


April 22, 2005





Mr. Roger Arwood

7105 W. Augusta Blvd.

Yorktown, Indiana  47396


Dear Roger:


On behalf of Gold Banc
Corporation, Inc. (Gold Banc), I am pleased to offer you the position of President,  Gold
Bank – Kansas and Executive Vice President, Chief Business Banking Officer of Gold
Banc.  Details of  your offer include:


	• 	A
semi-monthly salary of $11,041.66, which annualizes to $265,000.



	• 	An
annual bonus opportunity, of up to 55% of your base salary, based upon the company’s
performance  and your performance.  The parameters for obtaining this bonus will be
established by management, with  your input, upon your employment.



	• 	A
grant of 24,000 shares of restricted stock and 16,000 shares of restricted stock units to
be  issued following approval at the next Corporate Board of Directors Meeting.



	• 	Relocation
Assistance will be provided per Gold Banc’s Relocation Policy. (A copy of the policy
is  enclosed.)



	• 	A
Change of Control Agreement will be provided that will allow for a payment equal to 1
year of base  salary in the event that your employment is terminated within 24 months of
a corporate change of control.



	• 	Eligibility
to participate in our Health and Welfare Plans, once eligibility requirements are met.



	• 	Eligibility
to participate in the Company 401k plan, which currently provides a match of $.50 on the
$1.00 for the first 5% of voluntary contribution.



	• 	Eligibility
to participate in the Company’s Section 125 (Flexible Spending Accounts) for Medical
and  Dependent Care expenses.



	• 	Life
insurance in the amount of 5 times your annual salary to a maximum of $400,000.





It is important to note that Gold
Banc Corporation, Inc. reserves the right to modify and/or discontinue the benefits  it
provides, premium amounts it pays, eligibility rules, and other provisions of these
benefit plans, for any reason,  without notice.


With the acceptance of our offer,
it is anticipated that your employment will commence on or  about  June 1, 2005.  In
consideration of this offer, it is expected  that you will execute and return the
enclosed Confidentiality Agreement.  In addition, this letter and its  attachments should
not be construed  as a contract for employment, or for any length of employment.  This
offer is contingent upon satisfactory completion  of a drug test.  Continued employment
is contingent upon satisfactory results of a FBI fingerprint check.


Roger, on behalf of the senior
management of Gold Banc Corporation, Inc., we are very pleased to extend this offer to
you.  We hope that your association with us will be long and rewarding.  Please indicate
your comprehension and  acceptance of this offer by signing below and returning a
completed, signed copy of this letter in the envelope  provided.  This offer will expire
if a response is not received on or before May 3, 2005.


	 
	









Sincerely,





Ted Lister

Senior Vice President

Human Resources





I accept this offer of employment.





	/s/ Roger Arwood	 	May 9, 2005	 
	Roger Arwood	 	Date	 





Cc:  Mick Aslin


Enclosures
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5581 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to notify units of local government 

when a Native American group files a petition to become a federally 

recognized Indian tribe and before the decision on the petition is made, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2008 

Mr. CAMPBELL of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to notify units of 

local government when a Native American group files 

a petition to become a federally recognized Indian tribe 

and before the decision on the petition is made, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—When a petition requesting that 

5 a tribe be recognized, acknowledged, or reacknowledged 

6 through the Federal acknowledgment process as a feder7 ally recognized Indian tribe is filed with the Department 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5581 IH

1 of the Interior, the Secretary of the Interior, acting 

2 through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, shall notify in writ3 ing units of local government as follows: 

4 (1) Notification that a petition was filed and is 

5 still pending on the date of the enactment of this 

6 Act shall be made not later than 30 days after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (2) Notification that a petition has been filed 

9 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act 

10 shall be made not later than 60 days after the peti11 tion is filed. 

12 (3) Notification of that a decision on a petition 

13 will be announced shall be made not later than 90 

14 days before the decision is announced. 

15 (b) UNITS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT.—A unit of local 

16 government required to be notified under subsection (a)— 

17 (1) is local city, parish, or county government 

18 located within a 25 mile radius of land— 

19 (A) over which the Native American group 

20 would be given jurisdiction by or pursuant to 

21 the petition; 

22 (B) that would be taken into trust for the 

23 benefit of the Native American group by or pur24 suant to the petition; and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5581 IH

1 (C) ownership of which would be trans2 ferred to the Native American group by or pur3 suant to the petition; and 

4 (2) does not include any Indian tribe, school, or 

5 private persons or entities. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### Raymond R. Hamilton et al., Appellants, v Corona Ready Mix, Inc., Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 450]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Cotirt, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated June 29, 2004, which granted the defendant’s motion for a change of venue from Kings County to Queens County.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Queens County, is directed to deliver to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, *449Kings County, all papers filed in this action and certified copies of all minutes and entries *(see*CPLR 511 [d]).

The Supreme Court erroneously granted the defendant’s motion to change the venue of the instant action from Kings County to Queens County. Pursuant to CPLR 503 (a), the venue of an action is proper in the county in which any of the parties resided at the time of commencement. The sole residence of a domestic corporation for venue purposes is the county designated in its certificate of incorporation, despite its maintenance of an office or facility in another county *(see Graziuso v 2060 Hylan Blvd. Rest. Corp.,*300 AD2d 627 [2002]; *Altidort v Louis,*287 AD2d 669 [2001]). Here, the plaintiffs properly placed venue in Kings County, despite the fact that the defendant claimed that its office was located in Queens County, since Kings County was the county designated in the defendant’s certificate of incorporation, and the defendant failed to prove that the certificate had been amended to designate a different county. Adams, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Skelos, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance sheet of  MidAmerican  Energy  Company as of March 31,
1996, and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the
three months  ended  March 31,  1996,  and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,634,202
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    822,497
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         300,108
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       407,370
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 210,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,374,828
<COMMON>                                       801,576
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            451,680
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1,244,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          50,000
<PREFERRED>                                    81,461
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           1,381,240
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 99,800
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  64,860
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,453,217
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  4,374,828
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      507,596
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           31,962<F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     407,455
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     407,455
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        100,141
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             13,050<F2>
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 113,191
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       27,705
<NET-INCOME>                                   53,524
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    2,477
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  51,047
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       30,221
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      19,826
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         164,860
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.51
<FN>
<F1>Tag 37 includes operating and nonoperating income taxes and is excluded
from operating expenses in Tag 39 and on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
<F2>Tag 41 includes $2,642,000 of Income from Discontinued Operations, net of
income taxes.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
YANDLE v. FALLS.

No. COA05-376.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CVS12633).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice: (22-052)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Engagement Committee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This Committee reports to the NAC.

# DATES:

Monday, August 1 2022, 2:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m., Eastern Time.

# ADDRESSES:

Virtual meeting by dial-in teleconference and WebEx only.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Tara Strang, NAC STEM Engagement Committee, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (216) 410-4335, or                         *tara.m.strang@nasa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This meeting will be held virtually and will be available telephonically and by WebEx only. You must use a touch tone phone to participate in this meeting. Any interested person may dial the toll free access number 415-527-5035, and then the access code: 2761 487 1481 followed by the # sign. To join via WebEx, use link:                     *https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/​nasaenterprise/​j.php?​MTID=​m5eecf7216da57c61988d745c5b5ce1c1*                     and the meeting number and access code is 2761 487 1481 and the password is 3R9Mrnfnh@2 (case sensitive).                

*Note:*                     If dialing in, please “mute” your telephone. The agenda for the meeting will include the following:                

—Opening Remarks by Chair

—STEM Engagement Updates on Topics of Interest

—STEM Engagement Partnerships

—Formulation of New Findings and Recommendations

—Other Related Topics

It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Carol J. Hamilton,

Acting Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2022-14773 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
WRIGHT v. N.C. DEPT. OF HEALTH.

No. 517P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Brenda Eaddy, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Dept. of Health.

*265The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th day of September 2005 by Plaintiff for "Petition for Review":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of October 2005."
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

November 18, 2002

Before

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

Nos. 01-3068 & 01-3454

RUBEN GOMEZ-CHAVEZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

BRIAN PERRYMAN, District Director,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

IMMIGRATION AND

NATURALIZATION SERVICE,

 Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States

 District Court for the

 Northern District of Illinois,

 Eastern Division.

No. 01-C-5768

Suzanne B. Conlon, Judge.

_________________

Petition to Review Decision of the

Immigration and Naturalization Service.

INS File No. A 75 897-228

O R D E R

The opinion of this court issued on October 24, 2002, is amended to read as follows:
Nos. 01-3068 & 01-3454 Page 2

(1) Page 4, first full paragraph, line 12 to 13, “notice of appeal from that decision”

is changed to “petition for review.”

(2) Page 4, first full paragraph, line 15, “appeal” is changed to “petition.”

(3) Page 5, first full paragraph, line 6, “Appeal” is changed to “Case.”

(4) Page 5, first full paragraph, line 9, “appeal” is changed to “petition for review.”

(5) Page 5, first full paragraph, line 21 to 22, “appeal” is changed to “petition.”

(6) Page 5, first full paragraph under heading III, line 2, “appeal” is changed to

“petition for review.”

(7) Page 9, line 11 from the top, “on appeal” is changed to “in a petition for

review.”

(8) Page 10, second paragraph, line 2, “appeal” is changed to “petition for

review.”

SO ORDERED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5712 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5712

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To require disclosure by Federal contractors of certain violations 
       relating to the award or performance of Federal contracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Close the Contractor Fraud Loophole 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF THE FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION.

    The Federal Acquisition Regulation shall be amended within 180 days 
after the date of the enactment of this Act pursuant to FAR Case 2007-
006 (as published at 72 Fed Reg. 64019, November 14, 2007) or any 
follow-on FAR case to include provisions that require timely 
notification by Federal contractors of violations of Federal criminal 
law or overpayments in connection with the award or performance of 
covered contracts or subcontracts, including those performed outside 
the United States and those for commercial items.

SEC. 3. DEFINITION.

    In this Act, the term ``covered contract'' means any contract in an 
amount greater than $5,000,000 and more than 120 days in duration.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5712

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To require disclosure by Federal contractors of certain violations 
       relating to the award or performance of Federal contracts.
```
Order entered December 1, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00923-CV

CURTIS MAYS, Appellant

V.

PIPER HUNN, TRISHA MOORE AND

RED DOG PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-04535-C

ORDER

On November 16, 2020, this Court ordered court reporter Janet Wright to 

file by November 25, 2020, a supplemental reporter’s record containing the 

exhibits admitted in evidence at the trial of this case. As of the date of this order, 

Ms. Wright has not filed the supplemental reporter’s record. We ORDER Janet 

Wright to file a supplemental reporter’s record containing the exhibits admitted at 

the trial by December 8, 2020.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Wright and the parties.

/s/ LESLIE OSBORNE 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
STATE v. BELTON.

No. COA06-50.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from Lenoir (02CRS51000).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part; Vacate and remand restitution award.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-03-158-CV

CITY OF DALWORTHINGTON 	APPELLANTS

GARDENS AND DALWORTHINGTON

GARDENS ZONING BOARD OF 

ADJUSTMENT 

	V.

JAMES CRAIG ORR, JR.	APPELLEE	

	----------

	FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

We have considered “Appellants' Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM	

PANEL D:	DAUPHIHINOT, HOLMAND, and GARDNER, J.J.NOT, 		

DELIVERED: August 2268, 2003
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                           MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                           TYPE OF ENTITY                          RELATION
------------------                           --------------                          --------
<S>                                          <C>                                     <C>
MarkWest Michigan, Inc.                      Colorado Corporation                    Wholly-owned subsidiary

West Shore Processing Company, LLC           Michigan Limited Liability Company      Wholly-owned subsidiary

Basin Pipeline, LLC                          Michigan Limited Liability Company      Wholly-owned subsidiary

MarkWest Resources, Inc.                     Colorado Corporation                    Wholly-owned subsidiary

Matrex, LLC                                  Michigan Limited Liability Company      Wholly-owned subsidiary

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001020017
<NAME>                        ALLSTAR SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (228)
<INVENTORY>                                      7,442
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,458
<PP&E>                                           5,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (3,036)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,891
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,916
<SALES>                                        201,817
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               201,817
<CGS>                                          179,026
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  179,026
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,960
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (686)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,274
<DISCONTINUED>                                  (2,119)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (845)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.20)


</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Issac Luther HOLIFIELD; aka Isaac Luther Holyfield; aka Issac Luther Holyfield.

No. 49P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Anne Bleyman, for Isaac Luther Holifield.

Jennie Hauser, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 4th day of February 2006 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

*543Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th day of February 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."