alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012308EN.01001101.xml

| 8.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 308/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 308/11

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1035/2012

of 26 October 2012

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Kraška panceta (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Kraška panceta’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Kraška panceta’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 October 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 48, 18.2.2012, p. 32.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

SLOVENIA

Kraška panceta (PGI)

---
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5631 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 30, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, as the ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office 

Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

HR 5631 RFS

1 SECTION 1. CORPORAL BRADLEY T. ARMS POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1155 Seminole Trail in Char5 lottesville, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Corporal Bradley T. 

11 Arms Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 29, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
10-Q Exhibit 32.1: Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of iShares COMEX Gold Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lee Kranefuss, Chief Executive Officer of Barclays Global Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust at the dates and for the periods indicated.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2007            
|                             
|/s/    Lee Kranefuss         
|Lee Kranefuss *              
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Kranefuss is signing in his capacity as an officer of Barclays Global Investors International Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# L_2014050EN.01003701.xml

| 20.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 50/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 50/37

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1241/2012 of 11 December 2012 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1138/2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain fatty alcohols and their blends originating in India, Indonesia and Malaysia

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 352 of 21 December 2012
  )

On page 4, Article 1, the table, column ‘Company’:

for:

‘P.T. Ecogreen Oleochemicals Batam, Kabil, Batam’,

read:

‘P.T. Ecogreen Oleochemicals, Kabil, Batam’.

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 20, 2015

NO. 03-15-00265-CR

Robie Lee Lawhon, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court. Having reviewed the record and the 

parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the district court’s order. 

Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s order. The appellant shall pay all costs relating 

to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
**Exhibit 32.1**
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Dex Media West LLC (the"*Company*”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:
     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company forthe quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 (the “*Report*”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        Dated: November 10, 2004 /s/ George Burnett   George Burnett   President and Chief Executive Officer
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-15-00109- CR

Chelsea P odow ski, Ap pellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 5 O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, NO. C-1 -CR- 14- 2050 47, THE HO NORAB LE NANCY WRI GHT H OH ENGARTEN, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R
P ER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was orig inally due April 16, 2015. After three motions reque sting
an ex tens i o n o f t i me t o file t he brief were gra nted by this Court, the brief was due J uly 17, 2015. Appellant has nowfiled a f ourth motion requesting an extension of time to file the brief
. Appellant’s fo u rt h m otion for extension of time to file the brief is g rante d. Appellant’s counsel, J ames Gill, is order ed to tender a brief in this cause no later than Au gu s t 17, 2015. No further ex tensions will be gra nted. Fa ilure t o file t he brief by that date wi l l result in counsel being called befor e this Court to show cause why he should not be held in contempt for violating this order , and the appea l being abate d and rema nded to the trial court fo r a hear ing pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedur e 38.8. See Tex. R. App. P roc. 38.8( b)(2) , (3).I t is so ordered on this the 23rd da y of Jul y , 2015.

Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Do Not Publish

2
In re KBB and KAB.

No. 179P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 28, 2005.

Lynne G. Schiftan, Deputy County Attorney, for Dept. of Social Services.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of April 2005 by Respondent for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 28th day of April 2005."
Harvey C. TAYLOR, Jr. v. Don A. ABERNETHY, Individually and Jack C. Weir, Administrator Cta of the Estate of Romer Gray Taylor.

No. 646P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

Steve Dolley, Jr., for Harvey C. Taylor, Jr.

*455C. Randal Isenhour, John W. Crone, III, Hickory, James H. Kelly, Jr., Winston-Salem, for Don A. Abernethy.

Jack W. Heir, for Estate of Romer Gray Taylor.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 21st day of November 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of March 2006."
STATE v. WEBB

No. COA04-103

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed August 16, 2005

Certification Date September 6, 2005

Appeal from Pitt (02CRS5685, 02CRS5687, 02CRS5688, 02CRS54018).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error in trial; remanded for resentencing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,396,493
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               40,974,052
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,184,120
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,258,042
<DEPRECIATION>                                 293,332
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,746,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     26,317,057
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,725
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,460,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,746,577
<SALES>                                     78,947,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            83,457,096
<CGS>                                       73,364,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               73,364,404
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,588,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               665,165
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,041,830
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,498,002
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,430,827
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,067,175
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,067,175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Velda King, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Gerald R. Tuskey, Chief Financial Officer, of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd. for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd.









Dated November 10, 2005

/s/Velda King

Velda King,

President and Chief Executive Officer





/s/Gerald R. Tuskey

Gerald R. Tuskey,

Chief Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Randal Keith NELSON.

No. 298P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Daniel F. Read, Durham, Pro Se.

Neil Dalton, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 3rd day of June 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 6D2 3

- 2 099 Lower Tribunal No. 2021

- CF

- 000736

- A

- O

_____________________________ T ELLY E NGRAM , Appellant ,

v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the C ircuit Court for Orange County

. Marc L. Lubet , Ju dge.
March 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED

. TRAVER, C.J., and S TARGEL and BROWNLEE , JJ. , c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and David A. Davis , Special Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marissa V. Giles , Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appel lee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jamel Bell, Appellant, v Ralph Santor, as Superintendent of Chateaugay Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 101]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered November 1, 2004 in Franklin County, which denied petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

In July 2002, petitioner was released on parole and allowed to live in South Carolina with that state supervising his New York parole pursuant to the Interstate Compact for Out-of-State Parole Supervision *(see*Executive Law § 259-m). In September 2003, petitioner was taken into custody in South Carolina pursuant to a New York parole violation warrant and a preliminary parole revocation hearing was held. Probable cause to believe that petitioner had violated the conditions of his parole having been found, petitioner was returned to New York where his parole release was revoked following a final parole revocation hearing.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 70 proceeding seeking habeas corpus relief on the basis that, in violation of Executive Law § *259-i,*South Carolina failed to provide him with timely notice of the violation and failed to timely hold a preliminary parole revocation hearing. Supreme Court dismissed the petition without issuing an order to show cause or writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner now appeals.

*1193Initially, we note that petitioner’s challenge to the preliminary parole revocation hearing was rendered moot by the final parole revocation determination *(see People ex rel. David v New York State Div. of Parole,*12 AD3d 963, 964 [2004]; *People ex rel. McCummings v DeAngelo,*259 AD2d 794, 794-795 [1999], *lv denied*93 NY2d 810 [1999]; *see also Matter of Collins v Rodriguez,*138 AD2d 809, 809 [1988]). Petitioner’s remedy would be a challenge to the final parole revocation determination (see *People ex rel. McCummings v DeAngelo, supra*at 794). In any event, contrary to petitioner’s contention, when an out-of-state parolee violates the conditions of his or her parole in the receiving state, there are no time periods specified for holding a preliminary revocation hearing or for providing the parolee notice of such hearing *(see*Executive Law § 259-o [4]; *People ex rel. McIver v Murray,*275 AD2d 1009, 1010 [2000]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
STATE v. SELLERS.

No. COA05-1498.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 18, 2006.

Certification Date August 7, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (04CRS75446, 04CRS75448).

Case without published opinion. No error.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

43 

KA 12-01615 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL STANTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

REBECCA CURRIER, AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JON E. BUDELMANN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Cayuga County Court (Thomas G. Leone,

J.), entered June 22, 2012. The order denied the application of

defendant for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order denying his

application for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46, the 2009 Drug Law

Reform Act. As the People correctly concede, this appeal is not moot

even though the maximum sentence for defendant’s original drug

conviction has now expired. Defendant “was sentenced in another case

involving a later crime while he was still imprisoned on the earlier

charge. If he is resentenced on the earlier charge, that resentencing

could affect the time credited toward his later sentence” (People v

Paulin, 17 NY3d 238, 242; see People v Nieves, 94 AD3d 671, 672). 

We nevertheless conclude that County Court properly exercised its

discretion in determining that substantial justice required denial of

his application (see People v Gatewood, 87 AD3d 825, 826, lv denied 17

NY3d 903). It is well established that “[r]esentencing is not

automatic, and courts may deny the applications of persons who ‘have

shown by their conduct that they do not deserve relief from their

sentences’ ” (People v Colon, 110 AD3d 438, 438, quoting Paulin, 17

NY3d at 244). Although defendant is a military veteran who

participated in many vocational programs while incarcerated and had

only two minor disciplinary infractions during his incarceration,

“[t]he court properly concluded that defendant’s chronic inability to

control his behavior while at liberty outweighed” his positive

institutional record (People v Correa, 83 AD3d 555, 556, lv denied 17

NY3d 805; see People v Hurst, 83 AD3d 499, 499, lv denied 17 NY3d 796;
-2- 43 

KA 12-01615 

cf. People v Berry, 89 AD3d 954, 955-956).

Entered: February 7, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
STATE v. HALL.

No. COA05-654.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 2, 2006.

Certification Date May 22, 2006.

Appeal from Pender (04CRS1390).

Case without published opinion. No error.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 131 (Monday, July 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14717]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than August 10, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Erien O. Terry, Assistant Vice 
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, Georgia 30309, or 
electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89c8f9f9e5e0eae8fde0e6e7faa7cae6e4e4ece7fdfac9e8fde5a7effbeba7e6fbee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a1e0d1d1cdc8c2c0d5c8cecfd28fe2ceccccc4cfd5d2e1c0d5cd8fc7d3c38fced3c6">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. CommerceOne Financial Corporation, Birmingham, Alabama; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring CommerceOne Bank, 
Birmingham, Alabama.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-14717 Filed 7-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>