41718 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2022 / Notices 

14284 (2020) (Second Report and 

Order). These requirements will allow 

the Commission to receive, review and 

make eligibility determinations and 

funding decisions on applications to 

participate in the Reimbursement 

Program that are filed by certain 

providers of advanced communications 

service. These new information 

collection requirements will also assist 

the Commission in processing funding 

disbursement requests and in 

monitoring and furthering compliance 

with applicable program requirements 

to protect against waste, fraud, and 

abuse. 

On December 27, 2020, the President 

signed into law the Consolidated 

Appropriations Act, 2021, appropriating 

$1.9 billion to ‘‘carry out’’ the 

Reimbursement Program and amending 

the Reimbursement Program eligibility 

requirements to expand eligibility to 

include providers of advanced 

communications service with 10 million 

or fewer subscribers. See Public Law 

116–260, Division N-Additional 

Coronavirus Response and Relief, Title 

IX-Broadband internet Access Service, 

§§ 901, 906, 134 Stat. 1182 (2020). The 

Commission has interpreted the term 

‘‘provider of advanced communications 

service’’ to mean ‘‘facilities-based 

providers, whether fixed or mobile, with 

a broadband connection to end users 

with at least 200 kbps in one direction.’’ 

Second Report and Order, 35 FCC Rcd 

at 14332, para. 111. Participation in the 

Reimbursement Program is voluntary 

but compliance with the new 

information collection requirements is 

required to obtain Reimbursement 

Program support. 

The Secure Networks Act requires all 

providers of advanced communications 

service to annually report, with 

exception, on whether they have 

purchased, rented, leased or otherwise 

obtained covered communications 

equipment or service on or after certain 

dates. 47 U.S.C. 1603(d)(2)(B). The 

Second Report and Order adopted a 

new information collection requirement 

to implement this statutory mandate. 

See Secure Networks Act § 5. If the 

provider certifies it does not have any 

covered equipment and services, then 

the provider is not required to 

subsequently file an annual report, 

unless it later obtains covered 

equipment and services. Second Report 

and Order at para. 215. 

Separate from the Reimbursement 

Program, the Secure Networks Act 

requires all providers of advanced 

communications service to annually 

report, with exception, on whether they 

have purchased, rented, leased or 

otherwise obtained covered 

communications equipment or service 

on or after certain dates. 47 U.S.C. 

1603(d)(2)(B). If the provider certifies it 

does not have any covered equipment 

and services, then the provider is not 

required to subsequently file an annual 

report, unless it later obtains covered 

equipment and services. Second Report 

and Order, 35 FCC Rcd at 14370, at 

para. 215. 

The Commission therefore revised 

this information collection contained in 

the Public Notice released by the 

Wireline Competition Bureau on August 

3, 2021. This Public Notice, among 

other things, required providers 

participating in the Reimbursement 

Program to notify the Commission of 

ownership changes using the FCC Form 

5640 to ensure the accuracy of 

information on file for program 

participants when there is a change in 

ownership. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene Dortch, 

Secretary, Office of the Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14908 Filed 7–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION 

Notice of Agreements Filed 

The Commission hereby gives notice 

of filing of the following agreements 

under the Shipping Act of 1984. 

Interested parties may submit 

comments, relevant information, or 

documents regarding the agreements to 

the Secretary by email at Secretary@

fmc.gov, or by mail, Federal Maritime 

Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 

Washington, DC 20573. Comments will 

be most helpful to the Commission if 

received within 12 days of the date this 

notice appears in the Federal Register, 

and the Commission requests that 

comments be submitted within 7 days 

on agreements that request expedited 

review. Copies of agreements are 

available through the Commission’s 

website (www.fmc.gov) or by contacting 

the Office of Agreements at (202)-523– 

5793 or tradeanalysis@fmc.gov. 

Agreement No.: 201391. 

Agreement Name: South Atlantic 

Multiport Chassis Pool Agreement. 

Parties: Ocean Carrier Equipment 

Management Association, Inc.; 

Consolidated Chassis Enterprises LLC; 

South Atlantic Consolidated Chassis 

Pool LLC; CCM Pools LLC; Consolidated 

Chassis Management LLC; Georgia Ports 

Authority; Jacksonville Port Authority; 

North Carolina State Ports Authority; 

COSCO SHIPPING Lines Co., Ltd.; 

Hapag-Lloyd AG and Hapag-Lloyd USA 

LLC (acting as a single party); Maersk 

A/S and Hamburg Sud (acting as a 

single party); MSC Mediterranean 

Shipping Company S.A.; Ocean 

Network Express Pte., Ltd.; Wan Hai 

Lines Ltd.; and Zim Integrated Shipping 

Services Ltd. 

Filing Party: Joshua Stein; Cozen 

O’Connor. 

Synopsis: The Agreement provides for 

the formation and operation of a 

regional Chassis Pool that is intended to 

improve the quality and efficiency of 

operations relating to the use and 

operation of intermodal chassis in the 

Southeastern United States. 

Proposed Effective Date: 8/21/2022. 

Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/ 

FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/ 

AgreementHistory/65506. 

Dated: July 8, 2022. 

William Cody, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14943 Filed 7–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6730–02–P 

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 

Proposed Agency Information 

Collection Activities; Comment 

Request 

AGENCY: Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System. 

ACTION: Notice, request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System (Board) invites 

comment on a proposal to extend for 

three years, with revision, the 

Interchange Transaction Fees Survey 

(FR 3064; OMB No. 7100–0344). 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before September 12, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by FR 3064, by any of the 

following methods: 

• Agency Website: https://

www.federalreserve.gov/. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments at 

https://www.federalreserve.gov/apps/ 

foia/proposedregs.aspx. 

• Email: regs.comments@

federalreserve.gov. Include the OMB 

number or FR number in the subject line 

of the message. 

• FAX: (202) 452–3819 or (202) 452– 

3102. 

• Mail: Federal Reserve Board of 

Governors, Attn: Ann E. Misback, 

Secretary of the Board, Mailstop M– 

4775, 2001 C St. NW, Washington, DC 

20551. 

All public comments are available 

from the Board’s website at https://

www.federalreserve.gov/apps/foia/ 

proposedregs.aspx as submitted, unless 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2022 / Notices 41719 

1See 12 CFR 235.2(k) for the definition of 

‘‘Issuer.’’ 2See 12 CFR 235.2(m) for the definition of 

‘‘Payment card network.’’ 3See 12 U.S.C. 1693o–2(a)(3)(B). The Board’s 

biennial reports are available at https://

www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/regii-datacollections.htm. 4See Average Debit Card Interchange Fee by 

Payment Card Network https://

www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/regiiaverage-interchange-fee.htm. 

modified for technical reasons or to 

remove personally identifiable 

information at the commenter’s request. 

Accordingly, comments will not be 

edited to remove any confidential 

business information, identifying 

information, or contact information. 

Public comments may also be viewed 

electronically or in paper in Room M– 

4365A, 2001 C St. NW, Washington, DC 

20551, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. 

on weekdays. For security reasons, the 

Board requires that visitors make an 

appointment to inspect comments. You 

may do so by calling (202) 452–3684. 

Upon arrival, visitors will be required to 

present valid government-issued photo 

identification and to submit to security 

screening in order to inspect and 

photocopy comments. 

Additionally, commenters may send a 

copy of their comments to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) Desk 

Officer for the Federal Reserve Board, 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget, New Executive Office Building, 

Room 10235, 725 17th Street NW, 

Washington, DC 20503, or by fax to 

(202) 395–6974. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Federal Reserve Board Clearance 

Officer—Nuha Elmaghrabi—Office of 

the Chief Data Officer, Board of 

Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, Washington, DC 20551, (202) 

452–3829. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 

15, 1984, OMB delegated to the Board 

authority under the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA) to approve and 

assign OMB control numbers to 

collections of information conducted or 

sponsored by the Board. In exercising 

this delegated authority, the Board is 

directed to take every reasonable step to 

solicit comment. In determining 

whether to approve a collection of 

information, the Board will consider all 

comments received from the public and 

other agencies. 

During the comment period for this 

proposal, a copy of the proposed PRA 

OMB submission, including the draft 

reporting form and instructions, 

supporting statement, and other 

documentation, will be made available 

on the Board’s public website at https:// 

www.federalreserve.gov/apps/ 

reportforms/review.aspx or may be 

requested from the agency clearance 

officer, whose name appears above. 

Final versions of these documents will 

be made available at https://

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain, if 

approved. 

Request for Comment on Information 

Collection Proposal 

The Board invites public comment on 

the following information collection, 

which is being reviewed under 

authority delegated by the OMB under 

the PRA. Comments are invited on the 

following: 

a. Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the Board’s functions, 

including whether the information has 

practical utility; 

b. The accuracy of the Board’s 

estimate of the burden of the proposed 

information collection, including the 

validity of the methodology and 

assumptions used; 

c. Ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; 

d. Ways to minimize the burden of 

information collection on respondents, 

including through the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and 

e. Estimates of capital or startup costs 

and costs of operation, maintenance, 

and purchase of services to provide 

information. 

At the end of the comment period, the 

comments and recommendations 

received will be analyzed to determine 

the extent to which the Board should 

modify the proposal. 

Proposal Under OMB Delegated 

Authority To Extend for Three Years, 

With Revision, the Following 

Information Collection 

Collection title: Interchange 

Transaction Fees Survey. 

Collection identifier: FR 3064. 

OMB control number: 7100–0344. 

Frequency: Annual. 

Respondents: Debit card issuers and 

payment card networks. 

Estimated number of respondents: FR 

3064a, 527; FR 3064b, 15. 

Estimated average hours per response: 

FR 3064a, 160; FR 3064b, 75. 

Estimated annual burden hours: FR 

3064a, 84,320; FR 3064b, 1,125. 

General description of collection: The 

Debit Card Issuer Survey (FR 3064a) 

collects data from issuers of debit cards 

(including general-use prepaid cards) 

that, together with their affiliates, have 

assets of $10 billion or more. The 3064a 

collects information regarding the 

volume and value of debit card 

transactions; chargebacks and returns; 

costs of authorization, clearance, and 

settlement of debit card transactions; 

other costs incurred in connection with 

particular debit card transactions; fraud 

prevention costs and fraud losses; and 

interchange fee revenue.1

The Payment Card Network Survey 

(FR 3064b) collects data from payment 

card networks. The survey includes the 

volume and value of debit card 

transactions; interchange fees; network 

fees; and payments and incentives paid 

by networks to acquirers, merchants, 

and issuers.2

The data from the FR 3064a and FR 

3064b are used to fulfill a statutory 

requirement that the Board disclose 

certain information regarding debit card 

transactions on a biennial basis.3 In 

addition, the Board uses data from the 

Payment Card Network Survey (FR 

3064b) to publicly report on an annual 

basis the extent to which networks have 

established separate interchange fees for 

exempt and covered issuers.4

Proposed Revisions 

Debit Card Issuer Survey (FR 3064a) 

The Board is proposing the following 

changes in the Debit Card Issuer Survey 

instructions to include guidance that the 

Board has previously provided in 

response to questions from respondents: 

• Adding ‘‘Credit-push transactions 

(other than, where appropriate, returns), 

sometimes referred to as original credit 

transactions (OCTs)’’ to the General 

Instructions, Section II (All Debit Card 

Transactions), ‘‘Do Not Include’’ list to 

indicate that credit-push transactions 

should not be included in the response. 

• Modifying the General Instructions, 

Frequently Asked Questions, Q9.A to 

read: ‘‘A debit card transaction is the 

use of a debit card (including a generaluse prepaid card) by a person as a form 

of payment in the United States to 

initiate a debit to an account. Such 

transactions include those conducted 

with both business and consumer debit 

cards. Debit card transactions include 

charitable contributions, payments 

made to satisfy an obligation (e.g., tax 

liability), or payments made for other 

purposes, such as to fund another 

account (sometimes referred to as 

account funding transactions. Debit card 

transactions do not include credit card 

transactions, transactions initiated at an 

ATM, or credit-push transactions, 

sometimes referred to as original credit 

transactions (OCTs).’’ 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
41720 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2022 / Notices 

5To illustrate, consider an example of two 

networks, A and B, that enter a reciprocal 

arrangement in which Network B provides services 

that allow Network A’s debit cards (i.e., debit cards 

that have been issued by depository institutions 

under agreement with Network A) to be used at a 

merchant that accepts Network B but does not 

directly accept Network A. Network B may perform 

some or all of the processing functions for 

transactions performed with Network A’s debit 

cards at such a merchant. For its part, Network A 

may perform certain processing functions for such 

transactions, particularly with respect to issuers of 

Network A’s debit cards. Network A may also 

establish fees for issuers, including network fees 

and the interchange fees that issuers pay and 

receive, respectively. In this situation, the current 

survey instructions do not specify whether Network 

A, Network B, or both should report transactions 

when both networks are involved in the processing 

of the transactions. 

The Board proposes to implement 

these revisions starting with the next 

iteration of the Debit Card Issuer 

Survey. 

Payment Card Network Survey (FR 

3064b) 

The Board proposes to modify the 

instructions for the Payment Card 

Network Survey to clarify guidance for 

survey respondents. The proposed 

revisions provide instructions for 

reporting when multiple networks are 

involved in the processing of 

transactions. The Board is also 

proposing to modify the instructions for 

the Payment Card Network Survey to 

include guidance that the Board has 

previously provided in response to 

questions from respondents. The Board 

proposes to implement the revisions 

starting with the next iteration of the 

Payment Card Network Survey. 

Through recent communications with 

survey respondents, the Board has 

become aware that for debit card 

transactions where multiple networks 

are involved in the processing of the 

transactions, the involved payment card 

networks may be interpreting the 

existing survey instructions differently 

from one another. Such differing 

interpretations could potentially lead to 

overcounting of transactions, if all 

involved networks report such 

transactions in their survey responses, 

or undercounting, if none of them do.5

The changes to the survey instructions 

outlined below clarify which network 

should report such transactions, looking 

to ensure consistent reporting across 

respondents and eliminate the 

possibility of under- or overcounting of 

transactions in the survey responses. 

The Board is proposing to clarify the 

survey instructions to specify that a 

network should report values associated 

with debit card transactions for which 

that network establishes the interchange 

fee received by issuers, even if that 

network outsources some or all 

processing functions to another 

payment card network. Conversely, a 

network should not report values 

associated with debit card transactions 

for which another network establishes 

the interchange fee received by issuers, 

even if the former network performs 

some or all processing functions for 

these transactions on behalf of the other 

payment card network. The proposed 

clarification would be implemented 

through the following changes: 

• Modifying the text under General 

Instructions, Section II (Debit Card 

Transactions) to read: ‘‘Please enter 

totals for transactions related to debit 

cards, including general-use prepaid 

cards, linked to U.S.-domiciled accounts 

involving a merchant located in the 

United States during the calendar year 

(CY) 20XX. Important: In some cases, 

transactions may be processed by 

multiple networks due to the 

outsourcing of some or all processing 

functions. Please note the special 

instructions below to ensure proper 

treatment of such transactions.’’ 

• Removing ‘‘All debit card 

transactions (including general-use 

prepaid card transactions).’’ from 

General Instructions, Section II (Debit 

Card Transactions), ‘‘Include’’ list. 

• Adding ‘‘Transactions for which 

your network establishes the 

interchange fee received by issuers, 

even if your network outsources some or 

all processing functions for these 

transactions to one or more payment 

card networks.’’ to General Instructions, 

Section II (Debit Card Transactions), 

‘‘Include’’ list. 

• Modifying the General Instructions, 

Section II (Debit Card Transactions), 

‘‘Do Not Include’’ list to indicate that 

none of the following should be 

included in the response: (a) ‘‘Credit 

card transactions,’’ (b) ‘‘Transactions 

initiated at an ATM,’’ (c) ‘‘Credit-push 

transactions (other than, where 

appropriate, returns), sometimes 

referred to as original credit transactions 

(OCTs),’’ and (d) ‘‘Transactions for 

which another network establishes the 

interchange fee received by issuers, 

even if your network performs some or 

all processing functions for these 

transactions on behalf of the other 

payment card network.’’ 

To ensure that the revised survey 

instructions clearly and adequately 

clarify responses for debit card 

transactions when multiple networks 

are involved in the processing of the 

transactions, the Board is seeking 

comment on the following questions: 

• Are the proposed revisions to the 

survey instructions clear on which 

network would be responsible for 

reporting transactions when multiple 

payment card networks are involved in 

the processing of the transactions? 

• Are there potential challenges to 

reporting transactions based on the 

revised instructions? If so, are there 

further changes that the Board should 

consider to alleviate such challenges? 

• Are there other situations, similar to 

those described but involving different 

facts and circumstances, for which 

reporting would not be clarified by the 

proposed revisions? If so, are there 

further changes that the Board should 

consider to provide clarity in these 

situations? 

In addition, the Board is proposing to 

further clarify the survey instructions by 

including guidance that the Board has 

previously provided in response to 

questions from respondents and 

removing glossary items no longer 

relevant to the survey: 

• Modifying the General Instructions, 

Glossary of Terms, ‘‘Debit card 

transaction’’ definition to read: ‘‘Debit 

card transaction: Use of a debit card 

(including a general-use prepaid card) 

by a person as a form of payment in the 

United States to initiate a debit to an 

account. It does not include transactions 

initiated at an ATM, including cash 

withdrawals and balance transfers 

initiated at an ATM. For more details, 

see General Instructions, Frequently 

Asked Questions, Q8,’’ to (a) harmonize 

definitions across FR 3064a and FR 

3064b and (b) align the definition to the 

language in 12 CFR 235.2(h). 

• Modifying the General Instructions, 

Frequently Asked Questions, Q8.A to 

read: ‘‘A debit card transaction is the 

use of a debit card (including a generaluse prepaid card) by a person as a form 

of payment in the United States to 

initiate a debit to an account. Such 

transactions include those conducted 

with both business and consumer debit 

cards. Debit card transactions include 

charitable contributions, payments 

made to satisfy an obligation (e.g., tax 

liability), or payments made for other 

purposes, such as to fund another 

account (sometimes referred to as 

account funding transactions. Debit card 

transactions do not include credit card 

transactions, transactions initiated at an 

ATM, or credit-push transactions, 

sometimes referred to as original credit 

transactions (OCTs).’’ 

• Removing General Instructions, 

Glossary of Terms, ‘‘Number of 

merchant establishments’’ definition 

because the Payment Card Network 

Survey no longer collects such 

information. 

Legal authorization and 

confidentiality: The FR 3064 surveys are 

authorized by section 920(a) of the 

Electronic Fund Transfer Act, as 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2022 / Notices 41721 

6 12 U.S.C. 1693o–2. 

7The subsection refers to bi-annual disclosures 

and the Board interprets this to mean once every 

two years. See 76 FR 43458. 

8 15 U.S.C. 1693o–2(a)(3)(B). 

9 Id. 

10 Id. 

11 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4). 

amended by section 1075(a) of the 

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

Consumer Protection Act.6 This 

provision requires the Board, at least 

once every two years,7 to disclose 

aggregate or summary information 

concerning the costs incurred and 

interchange transaction fees charged or 

received by issuers or payment card 

networks in connection with the 

authorization, clearance, or settlement 

of electronic debit transactions as the 

Board considers appropriate and in the 

public interest.8 It also provides the 

Board with authority to require issuers 

and payment card networks to provide 

information to enable the Board to carry 

out the provisions of the subsection.9

The FR 3064 surveys are mandatory. 

The Board is required to release 

aggregate information from responses to 

the FR 3064 surveys.10 The Board 

additionally releases, at the network 

level, the percentage of total number of 

transactions, the percentage of total 

value of transactions, and the average 

transaction value for exempt and nonexempt issuers obtained on the FR 

3064b because it can be calculated 

based on information the Board already 

releases and may be useful to issuers, 

merchants, and policymakers in 

choosing payment card networks and 

assessing the effects of interchange 

regulations. The information contained 

in individual responses to the FR 3064 

surveys is nonpublic commercial or 

financial information, which is both 

customarily and actually treated as 

private by the respondent. The Board 

therefore keeps such information 

confidential pursuant to exemption 4 of 

the Freedom of Information Act 

(FOIA).11

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 

System, July 7, 2022. 

Michele Taylor Fennell, 

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14870 Filed 7–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6210–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention 

[CDC–2019–0015, Docket Number NIOSH– 

153–E] 

Publication of Skin Notation Profile 

Documents for Chlorodiphenyl (54% 

Chlorine) (CAS: 11097–69–1), Diacetyl 

and 2,3-Pentanedione (CAS: 431–03–8; 

600–14–6), Dioxane (CAS: 123–91–1), 

Beta Chloroprene (CAS: 126–99–8), 

and 2,4-Toluene Diisocyanate, 2,6- 

Toluene Diisocyanate, and 2,4- and 2,6- 

Toluene Diisocyanate Mixture (CAS: 

584–84–9; 91–08–7; 26471–62–5 (as a 

Mixture)) 

AGENCY: The Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention (CDC), Department of 

Health and Human Services (HHS). 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: The National Institute for 

Occupational Safety and Health 

(NIOSH) in the Centers for Disease 

Control and Prevention (CDC), an 

operating division of the Department of 

Health and Human Services (HHS), 

announces the availability of five 

documents, the Skin Notation Profiles 

for Chlorodiphenyl (54% chlorine) 

(CAS: 11097–69–1), Diacetyl and 2,3- 

Pentanedione (CAS: 431–03–8; 600–14– 

6), Dioxane (CAS: 123–91–1), beta 

Chloroprene (CAS: 126–99–8), and 2,4- 

Toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-Toluene 

diisocyanate, and 2,4- and 2,6-Toluene 

diisocyanate mixture (CAS: 584–84–9; 

91–08–7; 26471–62–5 (as a mixture)). 

DATES: The final documents were 

published on July 7, 2022 on the CDC 

website. 

ADDRESSES: The documents may be 

obtained at the following links: 

Chlorodiphenyl (54% chlorine) (CAS: 

11097–69–1): https://www.cdc.gov/ 

niosh/docs/2022-118/; 

Diacetyl and 2,3-Pentanedione (CAS: 

431–03–8; 600–14–6): https://

www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2022-116/; 

Dioxane (CAS: 123–91–1): https://

www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2022-114/; 

beta Chloroprene (CAS: 126–99–8): 

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2022- 

115/; 

2,4-Toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-Toluene 

diisocyanate, and 2,4- and 2,6-Toluene 

diisocyanate mixture (CAS: 584–84–9; 

91–08–7; 26471–62–5 (as a mixture)): 

https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2022- 

117/. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Naomi Hudson, NIOSH, 1090 Tusculum 

Ave., MS C–15, Cincinnati, OH 45226; 

Telephone 513–533–8388; Email: iuz8@

cdc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 

15, 2019, NIOSH published a request for 

public comment in the Federal Register 

[Federal Register Number 2019–04794] 

[84 FR 9524] on the draft versions of the 

following skin notation profile 

documents: 

Beta-Chloroprene (CAS: 126–99–8) 

Cyclohexanol (CAS: 108–93–0) 

Cyclohexanone (CAS: 108–94–1) 

Cyclonite (CAS: 121–82–4) 

Dioxane (CAS: 123–91–1) 

Diacetyl/2,3-Pentanedione (CAS: 431– 

03–8; 600–14–6) 

Diethylenetriamine (CAS: 111–40–0) 

Chlorodiphenyl (42% chlorine) (CAS: 

53469–21–9) 

Chlorodiphenyl (54% chlorine) (CAS: 

11097–69–1) 

Toluene diisocyanates (CAS: 584–84–9; 

91–08–7; 26471–62–5) 

This notice announces that five of 

these documents have been finalized 

and published: Chlorodiphenyl (54% 

chlorine) (CAS: 11097–69–1), Diacetyl 

and 2,3-Pentanedione (CAS: 431–03–8; 

600–14–6), Dioxane (CAS: 123–91–1), 

beta Chloroprene (CAS: 126–99–8), and 

2,4-Toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-Toluene 

diisocyanate, and 2,4- and 2,6-Toluene 

diisocyanate mixture (CAS: 584–84–9; 

91–08–7; 26471–62–5 (as a mixture)). 

All comments received were carefully 

reviewed and addressed, where 

relevant. In response to comments 

received, revisions were made to clarify 

the data used by NIOSH in its support 

of the development of the skin notation 

assignments for these chemicals. NIOSH 

Skin Notation Profiles, Group E 

Responses to Peer Review and Public 

Comments can be found in the 

Supporting Documents section on 

www.regulations.gov for the CDC–2019– 

0015 docket. 

The other five documents were 

previously published in the Federal 

Register [Federal Register Number 

2020–25300] [85 FR 73481] on 

November 18, 2020 (https://

www.federalregister.gov/documents/ 

2020/11/18/2020-25300/skin-notationprofiles-for-chlorodiphenyl-42-chlorinecas-53469-21-9-cyclohexanol-cas-108- 

93-0): Chlorodiphenyl (42% chlorine) 

(CAS: 53469–21–9), Cyclohexanol (CAS: 

108–93–0), Cyclohexanone (CAS: 108– 

94–1), Cyclonite (CAS: 121–82–4), and 

Diethylenetriamine (CAS: 111–40–0). 

John J. Howard, 

Director, National Institute for Occupational 

Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14906 Filed 7–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4163–18–P 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1