alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>                         0001020017
<NAME>                        ALLSTAR SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,538    
<SECURITIES>                                         0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,251    
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (358)  
<INVENTORY>                                      8,497   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,928   
<PP&E>                                           5,327   
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (2,425)  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,028   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,128   
<BONDS>                                              0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0   
<PREFERRED>                                          0   
<COMMON>                                            45    
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,723    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,028    
<SALES>                                        167,173   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               167,173   
<CGS>                                          145,039   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  145,039   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,422   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 351   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,639)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (541)  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,098)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0   
<CHANGES>                                            0   
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,098)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.25)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.25)  
                                           

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 1, 2017

p0125 

# Order

Clerk February 1, 2017

154062

MENARD, INC.,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v SC: 154062

COA: 325718

MTT: 00

- 441600; 14

- 001918

- TT

CITY OF ESCANABA,

Respondent

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order

addressing: (1) whether the Court of Appeals exceeded its limited appellate rev iew of a

decision of the Michigan Tax Tribunal; and, if so, (2) whether the Michigan Tax Tribunal

may utilize a valuation approach similar to that recognized in Clark Equipment Company

v Leoni Twp, 113 Mich App 778 (1982). The parties should not resubmit mere

restatements of their application papers.
Order entered July 25, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00176-CR

RAYMOND ELLIS NEWSOME, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F14-20384-W

ORDER

Appellant, who has been appointed counsel, filed written verification that he requested 

the reporter’s record on June 25, 2018. In light of this, we ORDER court reporter Patricia Holt 

to file the reporter’s record in this appeal WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to Judge Tracy Holmes, Presiding 

Judge, 363rd Judicial District Court; to court reporter Patricia Holt; to Ron Goranson, and to the 

Dallas County District Attorney.

 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
December 31, 2005 (the "Report") of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MICHAEL S. GROSS, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify,
to the best of my knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



/s/ Michael S. GrossName:

Michael S. GrossDate:

February 7, 2006
This memorandum opinion was not selected for pub lication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 MICHAEL MARTINEZ , 2 Worker-Appellant, 3 v. NO. A-1-CA-36537 4 CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, LLC and AIG , 5 Employer/Insurer-Appellees, 6 APPEAL FROM THE WORKERS’ COMPENSATION ADMINISTRATION 7 Leonard J. Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge 8 Gene N. Chavez 9 Albuquerque, NM 10 for Appellant 11 Hoffman Kelley Lopez, LLP 12 Dorielle Paull 13 Albuquerque, NM 14 for Appellees 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION 16 VIGIL, Judge. 172 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 1 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 2 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 3
{2} AFFIRMED. 4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED. 5

_______________________________ 6 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge 7 WE CONCUR: 8

___________________________________ 9 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 10

_________________________________ 11 EMIL J. KIEHNE, Judge 12
GAGNE v. BEST ADVANTAGE MARKETING GROUP, INC.

No. COA04-1724.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Catawba (02CVS2584).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# L_2012244EN.01003001.xml

| 8.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 244/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 244/30

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 793/2012 of 5 September 2012 adopting the list of flavouring substances provided for by Regulation (EC) No 2232/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council, introducing it in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1334/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000 and Commission Decision 1999/217/EC

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 243 of 7 September 2012
  )

The publication of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 793/2012 is to be considered null and void.

---
STATE v. SPENCER

No. COA03-1289.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 5, 2004.

Certification Date October 25, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Julius L. JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 436P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of August 2005 by Plaintiff for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of January 2006."
STATE v. NOLON.

No. COA05-818.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Carteret, (04CRS51119, 04CRS51120, 04CRS51121).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
IN RE B.B.

No. COA05-1355.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 2, 2006.

Certification Date May 22, 2006.

Appeal from Buncombe (97J416).

Case without published opinion. Dismissed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5583 

To withdraw the Tusayan Ranger District and Federal land managed by 

the Bureau of Land Management in the vicinity of Kanab Creek and 

in House Rock Valley from location, entry, and patent under the mining 

laws, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 11, 2008 

Mr. GRIJALVA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To withdraw the Tusayan Ranger District and Federal land 

managed by the Bureau of Land Management in the 

vicinity of Kanab Creek and in House Rock Valley from 

location, entry, and patent under the mining laws, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grand Canyon Water5 sheds Protection Act of 2008’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5583 IH

1 SEC. 2. WITHDRAWAL OF FEDERAL LAND FROM MINING 

2 LAWS. 

3 (a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the 

4 approximately 1,068,908 acres of Federal land generally 

5 depicted on the map titled llllllll, numbered 

6 llll, and dated llllll are hereby withdrawn 

7 from— 

8 (1) all forms of entry, appropriation, and dis9 posal under the public land laws; 

10 (2) location, entry, and patent under the mining 

11 laws; and 

12 (3) operation of the mineral leasing and geo13 thermal leasing laws and mineral materials laws. 

14 (b) TREATMENT OF EXISTING RIGHTS.—The with15 drawal under subsection (a) is subject to valid, existing 

16 rights. If such rights are relinquished or otherwise ac17 quired by the United States after the date of the enact18 ment of this Act, the land that was subject to the rights 

19 shall be immediately withdrawn in accordance with sub20 section (a). 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Global Green Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, J. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                    
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated this 15thday of April, 2011

| | Doug Frater                               
| | ------------------------------------------
| | J. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer

---
STATE v. HATCHETT.

No. COA05-680.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Guilford (03CRS24544, 03CRS24634, 04CRS24019)

Case without published opinion. Dismissed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.8



                               TERMINATION OF THE
                 METROPOLITAN LIFE AUXILIARY DEATH BENEFITS PLAN


The Metropolitan Life Auxiliary Death Benefits Plan (the "Plan") is hereby
terminated effective at 11:59 PM of the date of the execution of this
instrument:

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY



By:     /s/ Graham S. Cox
        --------------------------------

Name:   Graham S. Cox
        --------------------------------

Title:  Vice President
        --------------------------------




Date:   August 1, 2005
        --------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statements of operations on pages 24
and 25 of the Company's 1996 Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           4,401
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,077
<PP&E>                                          60,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,316)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,181
<BONDS>                                         11,257
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,254
<SALES>                                         71,760
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,952
<CGS>                                           40,907
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,907
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,760
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,609
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,151
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ MATTHEW A. JONES   
|Matthew A. Jones       
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 7, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5478 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5478

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 25, 2008

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for the continued minting and issuance of certain $1 coins 
                                in 2008.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That clause (i) of 
section 5112(n)(1)(B) of title 31, United States Code (as in effect on 
the day before the date of the enactment of Public Law 110-82) shall

              

 continue in effect, notwithstanding the amendment made by section 3 of 
Public Law 110-82, until the effective date of the amendment made by 
section 2 of such Public Law.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 25, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
STATE v. LOCKLEAR.

No. COA05-878.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. Remanded.
Order filed, January 10, 2018

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

____________ NO. 01

- 17

- 00956

- CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE , Appellant

V.

CESAR RANGEL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 80th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case 2015

- 64114



### ORDER The reporter’s record in this case was due 12/28/2017

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the reco rd. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Michelle Tucker , the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record in this appeal , if any, wit hin 10 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM
DISMISS and Opinion Filed October 16, 2019 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-18-01528-CV WONYOUNG KIM, Appellant V. COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-08792 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Schenck , Osborne, and Reichek Opinion by Justice Osborne By Order dated June 18, 2019, we a bated this appeal to allow fu rther proceedings in the district court to effectuate a settlement agreement. On September 12, 2019, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Dism iss Appeal. We reinstate this appeal. The parties report that they have reached a settle ment in this appeal of the trial court’s denial of appellant Wonyoung Kim’s motion to dismiss pursuant t o the Texas Citizens Participation Act. See T EX
. C IV
. P RAC

. & R EM
. C ODE §§ 27.001–27.011. The joint motion reflects that the parties have reached an agre ement, appellee Commission for Lawyer Discipline has filed a nonsuit of the disciplinary c ase underlying the appeal, and the trial court has signed an order granting nonsuit and dismissing all claims with prejudice. The parties request that we render judgment effectuating their agre ement pursuant to rule of appellate–2– procedure 42.1(a)(2)(A). That ru le provides that a court of app eals “may dispose of an appeal . . . in accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk” and may “render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). The parties also request that costs be taxed in accordance with the ir agreement that “each side shall bear their own costs in this appeal.” We dismiss this appeal. We render judgment in accordance with t he agreement of the parties, and order that each pa rty bear its own costs of appeal . T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A).

181528F.P05 /Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
WONYOUNG KIM, Appellant
No. 05-18-01528-CV V.
COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Appellee On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-08792. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. Justices Schenck and Rei chek participating.

In accordance with this Cour t’s opinion of this date, we REINSTATE this appeal. The joint motion of appellant Wonyoung Kim and appellee Commission for Lawyer Discipline to dismiss this appeal and render judgment effectuating the partie s’ agreement is GRANTED

. Pursuant to rule 42.1(a)(2)(A), Texas Rules of Appellate Proced ure, this appeal is DISMISSED

. The parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered October 16, 2019