40788 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 

15See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 

(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for 

Reviews). 

16See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 17See Order, 85 FR at 37423. 

importer and the total entered value of 

those same sales, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is 

zero or de minimis in the final results 

of review, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2). If a respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis in the final results 

of review, we will instruct CBP not to 

assess duties on any of its entries in 

accordance with the Final Modification 

for Reviews, i.e., ‘‘{w}here the weightedaverage margin of dumping for the 

exporter is determined to be zero or de 

minimis, no antidumping duties will be 

assessed.’’ 15 For entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by PESL for which the producer did not 

know its merchandise was destined for 

the United States, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate unreviewed entries at the 

all-others rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company (or companies) 

involved in the transaction.16

Should we continue to apply facts 

available with an adverse inference to 

Antique Group in the final results, we 

will instruct CBP to apply an 

assessment rate equal to the dumping 

margin of 323.12 percent, as indicated 

above, to all entries produced and/or 

exported by Antique Group. The 

assessment rate for antidumping duties 

for each of the companies not selected 

for individual examination will be equal 

to the weighted-average dumping 

margin identified in the final results of 

review. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the publication 

date of the final results of this 

administrative review, as provided by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for each company 

listed above will be that established in 

the final results of this administrative 

review, except if the rate is less than 

0.50 percent, and therefore, de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously reviewed or investigated 

companies not listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the company 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or in the investigation but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be the all-others rate of 1.02 percent, the 

rate established in the investigation of 

this proceeding, as adjusted for subsidy 

offsets.17 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in Commerce’s 

presumption that reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: June 30, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Partial Rescission of Review 

V. Application of Facts Available and Use of 

Adverse Inferences 

VI. Margin for Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

VII. Discussion of the Methodology 

VIII. Currency Conversion 

IX. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

Alicante Surfaces Pvt., Ltd. 

Antique Granito Shareholders Trust 

Argil Ceramic Private Limited 

ARO Granite Industries Limited 

Asian Granito India Ltd 

Baba Super Minerals Pvt. Ltd. 

Camrola Quartz Limited 

Chaitanya International Minerals LLP 

Chariot International Pvt. Ltd. 

Colors Of Rainbow 

Creative Quartz LLP 

Cuarzo 

Divyashakti Granites Limited 

Esprit Stones Pvt., Ltd. 

Globalfair Technologies Pvt. 

Glowstone Industries Private Limited 

Gupta Marbles 

Gyan Chand Lodha 

Hi Elite Quartz LLP 

Hilltop Stones Pvt., Ltd. 

Inani Marbles and Industries Ltd. 

International Stones India Private Limited 

Jennex Granite Industries 

Jessie Kan Granite Inc. 

Keros Stone LLP 

M.B. Granites Private Ltd. 

Mahi Granites Private Limited. 

Malbros Marbles & Granites Industries 

Marudhar Rocks International Pvt. Ltd. 

Mountmine Imp. & Exp. Pvt., Ltd. 

P.M. Quartz Surfaces Pvt., Ltd. 

Pacific Industries Limited 

Pacific Quartz Surfaces LLP 

Pangaea Stone International Private Ltd. 

Paradigm Granite Pvt., Ltd. 

Paradigm Stone India Private Limited 

Pelican Quartz Stone 

Quartzkraft LLP 

Rocks Forever 

Rose Marbles Ltd. 

Safayar Ceramics Private Ltd. 

Satya Exports 

Southern Rocks and Minerals Private Limited 

Stone Imp. & Exp. (India) Pvt., Ltd. 

Stoneby India LLP 

Sunex Stones Private Ltd. 

Tab India Granites Pvt., Ltd. 

Ultima International 

Vishwas Ceramic 

Vishwas Exp. 

Yash Gems 

[FR Doc. 2022–14565 Filed 7–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–878] 

Glycine From Japan: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that producers or exporters subject 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 40789 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

41821, 41823 (August 3, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from Japan: 

Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

February 22, 2022. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from Japan: 

Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc.’s Letter, 

‘‘Glycine from Japan (A–588–878): Partial 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated September 14, 2021. 

5See GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc.’s Letter, 

‘‘Glycine from Japan (A–588–878): Partial 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ 

dated November 1, 2021. 

6As explained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum, based on the record information, 

Commerce preliminarily determines that Nagase & 

Co., Ltd. and a non-selected respondent, Yuki Gosei 

Kogyo Co., Ltd., are affiliated within the meaning 

of section 771(33)(E) of the Act and should be 

treated as a single entity pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.401(f) for these preliminary results of review. 

7See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule 

Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to 

COVID–19, 85 FR 17006, 17007 (March 26, 2020) 

(‘‘To provide adequate time for release of case briefs 

via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date 

for all rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs 

are filed (while these modifications remain in 

effect).’’) 

8See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of 

Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

9See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing 

requirements). 

10See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

11See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

to this administrative review made sales 

of subject merchandise at less than 

normal value during the period of 

review June 1, 2020, through May 31, 

2021. We invite interested parties to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable July 8, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

K. Drury, AD/CVD Operations, Office 

VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0195. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 3, 2021, Commerce 

published the notice of initiation of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on glycine from 

Japan.1 On February 22, 2022, 

Commerce extended the time limit for 

these preliminary results to June 30, 

2022, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act).2

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is glycine. For a complete description of 

the scope of this administrative review, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.3

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of 

the Act. Export price and constructed 

export price are calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

conclusions, see Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is made available to the 

public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be found at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of the 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is attached as an 

appendix to this notice. 

Rescission of Administrative Review in 

Part 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the parties that requested a 

review withdraw the request within 90 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation. GEO Specialty 

Chemicals, Inc. withdrew its requests 

for review of Showa Denko K.K 4 and 

Yasunaga Trading Co., Ltd.5 Because the 

requests for review were timely 

withdrawn filed and no other parties 

requested a review of these companies, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), Commerce is partially 

rescinding this review of the order for 

these two companies. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

June 1, 2020, through May 31, 2021. 

Producer/exporter 

Estimated 

weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Yuki Gosei Kogyo Co., Ltd./ 

Nagase & Co., Ltd 6 ................ 24.48 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this 

administrative review within five days 

after public announcement of the 

preliminary results in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed not later than 

seven days after the date for filing case 

briefs.7 Commerce has modified certain 

of its requirements for serving 

documents containing business 

proprietary information until further 

notice.8 Parties who submit case briefs 

or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) a statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.9

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) 

the party’s name, address and telephone 

number; (2) the number of participants; 

and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. 

Issues raised in the hearing will be 

limited to those raised in the respective 

case briefs. If a request for a hearing is 

made, Commerce intends to hold the 

hearing at a time and date to be 

determined. An electronically filed 

hearing request must be received 

successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.10

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

the issues raised in any written briefs, 

no later than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice, unless 

extended, pursuant to section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the final results, 

Commerce shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries.11 If the weightedaverage dumping margin for Yuki Gosei 

Kogyo Co., Ltd./Nagase & Co., Ltd. is not 

zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 

percent) in the final results of this 

review, we will calculate an importerspecific assessment rate. Where the 

respondent reported reliable entered 

values, Commerce intends to calculate 

importer/customer-specific ad valorem 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
40790 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 

12See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

13 Id. at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

14See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

15See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue 

Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in 

Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January 

15, 2021). 

16See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended 

Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination 

and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170, 29171 

(June 21, 2019). 

1See Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of 

Carbon and Alloy Steel from the People’s Republic 

of China, the Federal Republic of Germany, India, 

Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Switzerland: 

assessment rates on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of such 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).12 Where the respondent 

did not report entered values, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce will calculate importer/ 

customer-specific assessment rates by 

dividing the amount of dumping for 

reviewed sales to the importer/customer 

by the total quantity of those sales. 

Commerce will calculate an estimated 

ad valorem importer/customer-specific 

assessment rate to determine whether 

the per-unit assessment rate is de 

minimis; however, Commerce will use 

the per-unit assessment rate where 

entered values were not reported. Where 

an importer/customer-specific ad 

valorem assessment rate is not zero or 

de minimis, Commerce will instruct 

CBP to collect the appropriate duties at 

the time of liquidation. If YGK/Nagase’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis in the final results 

of review, or if an importer-specific 

assessment rate for one of these 

companies is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.13 For entries of 

subject merchandise during the period 

of review produced by any of these 

companies for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries.14

Consistent with its recent notice,15

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). The final results of this 

administrative review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise under 

review and for future cash deposits of 

estimated antidumping duties, where 

applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the notice of final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of glycine from Japan entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication as provided by section 

751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) the cash deposit 

rate for companies subject to this review 

will be equal to the company-specific 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of the 

review; (2) for merchandise exported by 

a company not covered in this review 

but covered in a prior segment of the 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published in the completed segment for 

the most recent period; (3) if the 

exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, a prior review, or the original 

investigation but the producer is, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established in the completed segment 

for the most recent period for the 

producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

or exporters will be 53.66 percent, the 

all-others rate established in the lessthan-fair-value investigation, adjusted 

for the export-subsidy rate in the 

companion countervailing duty 

investigation.16 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221. 

Dated: June 30, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Affiliation 

V. Discussion of the Methodology 

VI. Currency Conversion 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–14564 Filed 7–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–475–838] 

Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing 

of Carbon and Alloy Steel From Italy: 

Preliminary Results of the 

Administrative Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order and 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that sales of certain colddrawn mechanical tubing of carbon and 

alloy steel (cold-drawn mechanical 

tubing) from Italy have not been made 

at less than normal value (NV) during 

the period of review (POR) June 1, 2020, 

through May 31, 2021. We also 

determine that one exporter had no 

shipments of cold-drawn mechanical 

tubing to the United States during the 

POR. We invite interested parties to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable July 8, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Whitley Herndon, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6274. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 11, 2018, Commerce 

published the antidumping duty order 

on cold-drawn mechanical tubing from 

Italy.1 On August 3, 2021, Commerce 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1