alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of New York Regional Rail
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Wayne A. Eastman, Jr., Principal Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Wayne A. Eastman, Jr.
Wayne A. Eastman, Jr.
Principal Executive Officer
April 19, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Teleglobe International Holdings Ltd (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Gerald Porter Strong, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company
as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.



Dated: November 12, 2004



/s/ GERALD PORTER STRONGGerald Porter Strong Chief Executive Officer and President of Teleglobe International Holdings
Ltd




This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
STATE v. McNEILL

No. COA04-340

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Wake (03CRS44481, 03CRS44523).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error in part; remanded for a new sentencing hearing in part.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION





I, Ronald E. Baron, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the

---

audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  May 16, 2005



/s/ Ronald E. Baron

Ronald E. Baron

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          15,992
<SECURITIES>                                   426,945
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,094
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               694,528
<PP&E>                                       1,224,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                 664,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,287,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          289,827
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,308
<OTHER-SE>                                     568,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,287,083
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,621,987
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,152,613
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               142,573
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,401
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                305,856
<INCOME-TAX>                                   119,282
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            186,574
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   186,574
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.43


</TABLE>
# Official Journal C 491/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 491 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5931 December 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 491

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5931 December 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 491/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 491/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | This issue closes the C series for 2016. |
| --- | --- |

EN

This issue closes the C series for 2016.
STATE v. WARD.

No. COA05-1282.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Cabarrus (04CRS53165)

Case without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. HENRY

No. COA05-90

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Guilford (03CRS105658, 03CRS105733, 03CRS105734, 03CRS105735).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.(the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Ted S. Smith, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, to the bestof my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ TED S. SMITH          |   |   |
|---------------------------|--------|--------|
|                      |
| Ted  S. Smith             |
| Chief Accounting  Officer |
|                      |
| October 20,  2005    |

 

Thiscertification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.  This certification shall notbe deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liabilityunder that section.  This certificationshall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extentthis Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated by referencein any such filing.

 

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
PALMER v. JACKSON.

No. COA05-1067.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. The order of the trial court is affirmed. Plaintiff's motion for sanctions and to dismiss this appeal is denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Barry Tyrone PITTS.

No. 27P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Barry Tyrone Pitts, Pro Se.

Diane A. Reeves, Assistant Attorney General, Howard S. Boney, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of January 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing WorldWide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Winzkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

/S/ MICHAEL WINZKOWSKI
-----------------------
Michael Winzkowski
Chief Executive Officer
August 15, 2005
exv10w2



 






Exhibit 10.2



AMENDMENT AND ALLONGE TO THAT CERTAIN SUBORDINATED

NOTE DATED APRIL 30, 2003 EXECUTED BY

WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION (“UNDERSIGNED”) IN

FAVOR OF LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (“BANK”) IN

THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $25,000,000 (“NOTE”)



          This Amendment and Allonge to the Note is made and accepted by the Undersigned as of this 7th
day of June, 2005. All capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined will have the same
meanings herein as in the Note.




          Bank and the Undersigned have agreed to amend the Note as herein provided. Accordingly the
Note is hereby amended as follows:





     1. The rate of interest referred to in the fourth paragraph of the Note is hereby
changed from the interest rate set forth therein to LIBOR Rate plus 1.60%.




     2. Except as specifically amended hereby, the Note shall remain in full force and
effect as issued. An executed original of this Amendment and Allonge shall be firmly
affixed to the original Note so as to become a part thereof and will constitute an
integral part thereof.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ David A. Dykstra
 	 
	 	Title:  Senior Executive Vice President and Chief 	 
	 	 	Operating Officer 	 
	 



Accepted and Agreed as of the

7th day of June, 2005.



LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION





	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/
Jeffrey Bowden	 
	Title:   Senior Vice President
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 07a0144n.06

Filed: February 21, 2007

No. 06-5526

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

EVA FULKS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT

COURT FOR THE EASTERN

DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

M E M O R A N D U M

O P I N I O N

BEFORE: NORRIS, COLE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. Claimant Eva Fulks was born with a heart defect and has received

Supplemental Security Income benefits for most of her life. In 2002, however, the Commissioner

deemed her no longer disabled because her medical impairments had improved to the extent that her

residual functional capacity allowed her to perform gainful activity. The district court affirmed the

Commissioner’s decision. Because her benefits have since been reinstated, this appeal concerns only

the two-year period during which she did not receive them.

Claimant contends that the Commissioner’s failure to provide a complete administrative

record dating back to the 1970s, when she was first deemed to be eligible for benefits, denied her

an opportunity for meaningful review. When the cessation of benefits is at issue, the central question

is whether the claimant’s medical impairments have improved to the point where she is able to
No. 06-5526

Fulks v. Commissioner

- 2 -

perform substantial gainful activity. 42 U.S.C. § 423(f). However, improvement is measured not

from the initial award of benefits but from “the most recent favorable decision that you were disabled

or continued to be disabled.” 20 C.F.R. § 416.994(b)(1)(i). In this case, the last favorable decision

prior to termination occurred in 1992. Hence, as the district court recognized, review of medical

records dating back to the 1970s was not necessary to the analysis.

With this time frame in mind, we have reviewed the extensive medical record and the

decision of the administrative law judge, which was summarily affirmed by the Appeals Council.

We find substantial evidence to support the conclusion that, at the time of the decision below,

claimant’s condition had improved to the extent that she could perform unskilled, light work. See

generally Longworth v. Comm’r, 402 F.3d 591, 595 (6th Cir. 2005) (Commissioner’s decision must

be affirmed unless she has applied the incorrect legal standard or has made factual findings that are

unsupported by substantial evidence). For her part, claimant herself points to nothing in the

administrative law judge’s decision that represents an incorrect legal standard or an insufficiently

supported factual finding. 

The Commissioner’s decision is affirmed based upon the reasoning contained in the decision

of the administrative law judge dated April 7, 2004.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Gerald R. Tuskey, Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.









August 11, 2005

/s/Gerald R. Tuskey



Date

Gerald R. Tuskey,

Chief Financial Officer and Director
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 1669

SHOMARI SALIM DALEY
,
Plaintiff

- Appellant
,

v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD; THE EXCHANGE AT WHEATON STATION; FAMILY SERVICES INC.; CHRISTOPHER CALANGAN, Service Coordinator, Family Services, Inc.; HOUSING INITIATIVE PROGRAMS; KIM PINDELY, Housing Initiative Programs
,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paula Xinis , District Judge. ( 8:18

- cv

- 01151

- PX )

Submitted : September 13, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Shomari Salim Daley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Shomari Salim Daley appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint
without prejudice for failure to comply with the court’s order requiring Daley to amend
the complaint

. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district cour t. Daley v. Maryland , No.

8:18

- cv

- 01151

- PX (D. Md. May 22, 2018)

. We also deny Daley’s motion for a default
judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the court dismissed the complaint without prejudice, it is clear that further amendment to the complaint would not likely cure the complaint’s defects, so we may exercise jurisdiction over the appeal. Cf. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y , 807 F.3d 619, 623, 628 (4th Cir. 2015) (order dismissing complaint without prejudice not appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012) if plaintiff could save action by amending complaint).
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The followingcertification accompanies the issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2006, and is not filed, as provided in Release33-8212, 34-47551.

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Treaty Oak Bancorp, Inc. (“Treaty Oak”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Jeffrey L. Nash, Chief Financial Officer of Treaty Oak, hereby certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Treaty Oak.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Treaty Oak andwill be retained by Treaty Oak and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: May 15, 2006 |                    |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
|                |                    |
|                |                    |
|                | /s/ Jeffrey L. Nash     |   |
|                | Jeffrey L. Nash         |
|                | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Registration Nos. 333-123332, 333-58648, 333-59826, 333-82122, 333-104697, 333-113299, 333-134618and 333-143446 ) and Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-107799, 333-107028, 333-129687, 333-140424 and333-140424) of our reports dated March 17, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2007./s/ Ernst & Young LLPAustin, Texas