alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20739 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus SAJID KHAN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-95-1203
- - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Sajid Khan appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Khan argues that ineffective assistance of counsel deprived him of his right to a direct criminal appeal. Khan's failure to raise in the district court the argument that a meritorious issue for appeal concerned an unfulfilled promise by the Government and his counsel regarding his sentence precludes our consideration of this argument. See Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920No. 95-20739 -2- F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). In light of the well-reasoned memorandum opinion by the district court, see United States v. Khan , No. H-95-1203 (S.D. Tex. August 1, 1995), we AFFIRM. AFFIRMED.
# L_2012069EN.01000501.xml

| 8.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 69/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 69/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 187/2012

of 7 March 2012

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Tolminc (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovenia's application to register the name ‘Tolminc’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) and in accordance with Article 17(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovenia's application to register the name ‘Tolminc’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 March 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 185, 25.6.2011, p. 14.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

SLOVENIA

Tolminc (PDO)

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7421
LORENZO ADKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WARDENS, Indian Creek Correctional Center, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-95-315) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 24, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lorenzo Adkins, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See I.O.P. 36.5 and 36.6.2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom , 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied , 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
134666 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan W.J. O’NEIL COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 134666 COA: 277502 Washtenaw CC: 06-001147-CK BARTON MALOW COMPANY, Defendant, and

SHEPLEY, BULFINCH, RICHARDSON & ABBOTT, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 3, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1213 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 20, 2007

Clerk
# C_2017094EN.01001701.xml

| 25.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/17

---

Corrigendum to the statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Medicines Agency for the financial year 2017

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 84, 17 March 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 84, 17 March 2017

(2017/C 94/11)

On page 37, in the row Chapter 1 2 ‘Expenditure relating to staff recruitment’, column ‘Appropriations 2017’:

for:

for:

‘23 000’,

read:

read:

‘230 000’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,313,618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,906,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (963,130)
<INVENTORY>                                 13,330,921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,631,139
<PP&E>                                      68,077,881
<DEPRECIATION>                            (16,884,196)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             177,685,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,011,334
<BONDS>                                    115,245,228
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,838
<OTHER-SE>                                  34,648,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               177,685,010
<SALES>                                    191,090,864
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           191,090,864
<CGS>                                      133,598,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              133,598,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            44,489,788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               385,282
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,764,549
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (761,876)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   587,669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,349,545)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,349,545)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.75)


</TABLE>
STATE v. DOZIER.

No. COA05-15.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Franklin (00CRS51945, 00CRS51935, 01CRS1730).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.02

                 Certification of Maureen Howley, Senior Vice
                    President and Chief Financial Officer
                    -------------------------------------


     I, Maureen Howley, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., as Managing Owner of Kenmar Global
Trust, certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2004 of Kenmar Global Trust fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Kenmar Global Trust.



Date: March 31, 2005                By: /s/ Maureen Howley
      ------------------                ---------------------------------
                                        Maureen Howley
                                        Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer


                                     E-5
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Susquehanna River Basin Commission

# AGENCY:

Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice lists Grandfathering Registration for projects by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission during the period set forth in DATES.

# DATES:

June 1-30, 2022.

# ADDRESSES:

Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel and Secretary to the Commission, telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax: (717) 238-2436; email:                         *joyler@srbc.net.*                         Regular mail inquiries may be sent to the above address.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This notice lists GF Registration for projects, described below, pursuant to 18 CFR part 806, subpart E, for the time period specified above:

1. Lebanon Valley College, GF Certificate No. GF-202206217, Annville and North Annville Townships, Lebanon County, Pa.; Football Well, Baseball Well, and West (Soccer) Well; Issue Date: June 16, 2022.

2. Beavertown Municipal Authority—Public Water Supply System, GF Certificate No. GF-202206218, Beaver Township, Snyder County, Pa.; Well 3; Issue Date: June 30, 2022.

3. Cooper Township Municipal Authority—Public Water Supply System, GF Certificate No. GF-202206219, Rush Township, Centre County, Pa.; Black Bear Run; Issue Date: June 30, 2022.

4. Municipal Authority of the Borough of Shenandoah—Public Water Supply System, GF Certificate No. GF-202206220, Union and West Mahanoy Townships, Schuylkill County, Pa.; Raven Run Reservoir No. 2; Issue Date: June 30, 2022.

5. Standard Steel, LLC—Standard Steel, GF Certificate No. GF-202206221, Burnham Borough, Mifflin County, Pa.; Creighton Run, Kishacoquillas Creek, and consumptive use; Issue Date: June 30, 2022.

*Authority:*                     Public Law 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509                     *et seq.,*18 CFR parts 806 and 808.                

Dated: July 7, 2022.

Jason E. Oyler,

General Counsel and Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2022-14807 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7040-01-P
ORIGINA1 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 23-0054 

THE MARY ELLEN DUKE TRUST, dated 

March 13, 1997, MILLARD COX, MINA COX, 

and TROUT CREEK RANCH, 

Plaintiffs and Appellees. 

v. 

LEE LOU, LLC, a Montana limited liability 

company, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

FILED 

MAY 2 3 2023 

Bovven Greenwood 

Clerk of Supreme COUI 

tato yAnntar,E. 

ORDER 

Appellees The Mary Ellen Duke Trust, dated March 13, 1997, Millard Cox, Mina 

Cox, and Trout Creek Ranch (collectively "Trout Creek Ranch") have moved to dismiss 

this appeal, arguing that Appellant Lee Lou, LLC ("Lee Lou"), is attempting to appeal from 

an order granting partial summary judgment, which is not appealable as provided by 

M. R. App. P. 6(5)(b). Trout Creek Ranch alleges that the District Court has not disposed 

of all of the claims raised by Lee Lou in its counterclaim and therefore this matter is not 

ripe for appeal. 

Lee Lou opposes Trout Creek Ranch's motion and alleges that it has appealed from 

an order granting summary judgment that is a final judgment, as the District Court granted 

summary judgment to Trout Creek Ranch and thereby disposed of all the remaining claims 

and causes of action in the underlying litigation. 

The underlying litigation is a quiet title and declaratory judgment action concerning 

an easement that affects real property owned by the parties. At issue in this appeal is the 

December 30, 2022 Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and 

Denying Defendant/Counterclaimant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, for which 

05/23/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0054
the court accordingly entered judgment. As Lee Lou explains in its response to Trout Creek 

Ranch's motion to dismiss, although Trout Creek Ranch's Complaint to Quiet Title set 

forth a claim that combined both a claim to quiet title and a claim for declaratory judgment, 

Lee Lou in its Verified Counterclaim and Third-Party Complaint to Quiet Title broke out 

these two claims as two separate counts but in so doing, Lee Lou did not intend to plead 

any claims unrelated to those set forth in Trout Creek Ranch's Complaint. 

Lee Lou asserts unequivocally that the relief granted to Trout Creek Ranch in the 

District Court's Order disposed of all of Lee Lou's remaining claims. We have examined 

the record in this matter to the extent necessary to resolve this motion to dismiss, and we 

conclude that the December 30, 2022 Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary 

Judgment and Denying Defendant/Counterclaimant's Motion for Partial Summary 

Judgment disposed of all claims in the underlying litigation and is therefore properly before 

this Court on appeal. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is DENIED. 

The Clerk is directedct,y provide a copy of this Order to all parties of record. 

DATED this '''S laay of May 2023. 

Chief Justice 

gi fir 411,
# L_2012318EN.01000501.xml

| 15.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 318/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 318/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1069/2012

of 31 October 2012

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Newmarket Sausage (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Newmarket Sausage’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Newmarket Sausage’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 October 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 69, 7.3.2012, p. 15.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat-based products

UNITED KINGDOM

Newmarket Sausage (PGI)

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jason Michael Badyrka v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-21-00339-CR

Trial court case number: 1129647

Trial court: 182nd District Court of Harris County

Court-appointed counsel for appellant Jason Michael Badyrka has filed a brief 

concluding that this appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). 

Appellant, acting pro se, filed a motion requesting access to a copy of the appellate record for

use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 

315, 318–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Appellant also has requested an extension of time to file 

his pro se response to counsel’s Anders brief. 

However, on September 13, 2021, appellant filed his pro se brief in response to counsel’s 

Anders brief. The brief contains references to the clerk’s record. And the court reporter has 

notified the Court that no reporter’s record was taken. 

Accordingly, we deny both motions as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Julie Countiss__________

Acting individually

Date: September 21, 2021
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5289 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5289

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ammonium bifluoride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

 Mr. Ferguson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on ammonium bifluoride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMMONIUM BIFLUORIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.28.20 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Ammonium bifluoride) is 
amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Rashawn Drean YARRELL.

No. 448PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

*635Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Rashawnn D. Yarrell.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 30th day of August 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
exv10w55



 





Exhibit 10.55




LANDEC CORPORATION

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SCHEDULE



Non-employee Directors will receive the annual retainers, meeting fees, meeting expenses and
equity-based awards described below as compensation for serving as a Director.



Annual Retainers



Board Retainer — Each Director will receive an annual board retainer of $20,000 to be paid in
quarterly installments of $5,000.



Compensation Committee Chair Retainer — Each Director who serves as the Chair of the Compensation
Committee will receive an annual retainer of $5,000.



Audit Committee Retainer — Each Director who serves on the Audit Committee will receive an annual
retainer of $10,000, with the Chairman receiving an annual retainer of $15,000.



Lead Independent Director Retainer — Each Director who serves as the Lead Independent Director of
the non-employee executive sessions of the Board shall receive an annual retainer of $10,000.



Meeting Fees



Each Director will receive $1,000 for each regular meeting, adjourned regular meeting or special
meeting of the Board attended by the Director, $500 for each regular meeting, adjourned regular
meeting or special meeting of a Committee attended by the Director as a member of the Committee,
and $1,000 for each shareholder meeting attended by the Director.



Meeting Expenses



Reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by a Director to attend Board meetings, Committee
meetings or shareholder meetings in his or her capacity as a Director will be reimbursed.



Equity Compensation Awards



Directors are automatically granted options to purchase shares of the Company’s Common Stock
pursuant to the terms of the Company’s 1995 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (the “Directors’ Plan”).
Under the Directors’ Plan, each Director who has not previously been granted an equivalent option
under any stock option plan of the Company will be granted a nonstatutory stock option to purchase
20,000 shares of Common Stock (the “First Option”) on the date on which the person first becomes a
Director. Thereafter, on the date of each annual meeting of the shareholders, such Director
(including Directors who were not eligible for a First Option) will be granted an additional option
to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock ( a “Subsequent Option”) if, on such date, he or she
shall have served on the Company’s Board of Directors for at least six months prior to the date of
such annual meeting. The First Option and each Subsequent Option are fully vested and exercisable
on the date of grant. Options granted under the
Directors’ Plan have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the
date of grant with a term of ten years.