## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS N O S. A P - 76, 000, A P - 76, 001 & A P - 76, 002

EX PA R TE PA TR I C K LE O N D O S W A LL ER A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ONS F OR W RI TS OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N OS . F - 9 0 5 6 0 5 6 - VI , F 9 2 - 0 2 5 6 0 - J I , F 9 2 - 4 0 8 7 4 - LI I N CRI M I NAL DI S TRI CT CO URT NO . 2 FROM DALLAS CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt these a pplications for wr it of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant plea ded not guilty to an ag g ravated robber y char g e in ca

use no. F 92-40874-L I , but was convic ted following a jury trial, and sente nced to life imprisonment. The FifthCourt of Appea ls affirme d his conviction. W all e r v . S tate , AP-05-93- 00 33 5- CR, (T e x. Ap p. – D a lla s, 19 93 ) ( no t de sig nate d f or pu bli c a tio n) . App lic ant ple a de d guil ty to an ag g ravated kidnapingchar g e in cause no. F 92-02560-JIand the tria l judge assessed punishment of 30 y ear s’ conf

inement. The F ifth Court of Appea ls dismi ssed his appea l. Se e W all e r v . S tate , A P-2

05-93-00333- CR, (Tex. App. – Dallas, 1993 ) (not desig nated f or publication). Applica nt was char g ed with the af

oreme ntioned offe nses while he w as on def err ed adjudicat i o n p ro b at ion in a possession of controlled substanc e ca se in ca use number F -9056056-VI . Foll o wi ng the jury ’s conviction in the ag g ravated kidnapin g ca s e, the trial judg e adjudicated Applicant’ s g uilt, and

a sse ssed a sen ten ce o f 20 y e ars ’ c on fi ne me nt. Th e F if th C ourt of Ap pe a ls d ism iss e d h is a

pp e a l. W alle r v . S tate , AP-05-93-00332- CR, (Tex. App. – Dallas, 1996) (not desig nated f or publication). I n Wri t Nos. WR-70,417-02 and WR-70,417-03, Applicant cha lleng es his ag g ravated kid na pin g and a g g ra vate d r ob be ry

c on vic tio ns . App lic ant c on te nd s h e is a c tua lly inn oc e nt o f t

he se of fe ns e s a s n e w D NAe vid e nc e sh ow s th a t he did no t c om mi t th e se xua l a ssa ult un de rl yingthe se offe nses. He ha s submitt ed ev i d en ce show ing that new DNAtesting shows that another ma n
c omm itt e d th e un de rl yingse xua l a ssa ult and that this man h a s c on fe sse d to c omm itt ingthe se offe nses. The tria l judge has ente red f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law re co m m ending that relief be g rante d on the basis of a ctual innoce nce. Ex parte Elizondo , 9 47 S.W. 2d 20 2 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 96 ); Ex parte Tuley , 109 S.W .3d 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002) . The trial judg e’s f indings a re supported by

the re cord. We g rant re lief on ac tual innocenc e g rounds. I n Writ No. W R-70,417-01, Appli cant challeng es hi s possession of a controlled substance offe nse. He contends that the r evocation of his de fe rr ed adjudication probation violated his due proce ss rig hts as there is no evidence to support a finding that he violated the te rms of his probation, b u tfo r t h e a ggra v at ed ro b b ery o ff en s e wh i ch h e h as n o w s h o wn h e d i d n o tco m m i t . T h e t ri al j u d ge has ente red f

indings of f

act a nd conclusions of lawrec ommending that relief be g rante d. We ag ree . We gr ant re lief. R eli ef is g rante d. The judg ments in Cause Nos. F92- 02560-JI and F 92-40874-L Ifrom3

Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County are set aside, a

nd Appli cant is re manded to the cust o d y o f t h e S h eriff

of Dallas County

to answer

the cha rg es ag ainst him . The trial c ourt’s judgme nt revokingcommunity supervision in Cause No. F90- 56056-VI is set aside a nd the Dire ctor of the Texas D epar

tment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division i s order ed to re turn Applicant to the custody

of Da llas County

for f urther pr ocee dings by

the trial cour

t. Copies of this opinion s h al l b e s en tt o t h e T ex as De p ar t m en to f C ri m i n al J u s t i ce

– C o rr ec t ional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: September

24, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh