alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.21

                                  LEGAL LETTER

<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 10.21



                                  LEGAL LETTER

The  undersigned  hereby  confirms to have examined the  following  documents in
Beijing Li-Fang Law Firm on Apr. 8, 2004.

1.  Business  License for  Enterprises  as Legal  Persons of Beijing Shi Ji Rong
Chuang Science and Technology Co. Ltd;
2. Articles of  Association of Beijing Shi Ji Rong Chuang Science and Technology
Co Ltd;
3.  Business  License  for  Enterprises  as Legal  Persons of Beijing EW Xintong
Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd (QuickNet);
4.  Articles  of  Association  of  Beijing  EW  Xintong   Science  &  Technology
Development Co., Ltd;
5. "Purchase  Contract"  signed between the  shareholders of Beijing Shi Ji Rong
Chuang Science and Technology Co Ltd and XIN NET CORP.

On the basis of the  facts  enunciated  in the  above-mentioned  documents,  the
undersigned hereby proposed the following legal opinions:

1.  Documents  listed  in Item 1 - 4 are legal  and  valid  documents  issued by
Chinese competent departments on registration.
2. Beijing Shi Ji Rong Chuang Science and Technology Co Ltd possess 2% of shares
of Beijing EW Xintong Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd.
3. Wei Kun and Wei Xin are  shareholders  of Beijing Shi Ji Rong Chuang  Science
and Technology Co Ltd. Wei Kun and Wei Xin hold 50% of registered capital of the
Company  respectively,  the  above  two  shareholders  represent  100% of equity
interests of the Company.
4. Wei Kun and Wei Xin signed a "Purchase  Contract" with XIN NET CORP. agreeing
to grant XIN NET CORP the  purchasing  right of 100% of equity  interests of Wei
Kun and Wei Xin in the Company,  the above  contract  complies with the relevant
laws of the People's Republic of China.



                                        Beijing Li-Fang Law Firm

                                        Beijing Li-Fang Law Firm (Seal)

                                        Liu Xudong, Lawyer

                                        Apr. 8, 2004

<PAGE>

                              NOTARIAL CERTIFICATE
                                 (Translation)


                                                   (2004) J.G.Z.W.J.Zi, No. 0079



     This is to certify  that the Lawyer Liu Xudong of Beijing  Li-Fang Law Firm
affixed his signature on the Legal letter  attached  hereto on Apr. 8, 2004, the
Seal of Beijing  Li-Fang Law Firm and the Signature of Liu Xudong affixed on the
Legal letter are found to be authentic. The English Translation is in conformity
with the Chinese original.






                            Notary:  Chen Gang

                            International Prestige Notary Public Office, Beijing

                            The People's Republic of China

                            Apr. 12, 2004
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5506 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, as 

the ‘‘Bishop Ralph E. Brower Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2008 

Mr. SIRES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey 

City, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Bishop Ralph E. Brower Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BISHOP RALPH E. BROWER POST OFFICE 

4 BUILDING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. 

7 Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, shall be known and desVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:56 Feb 28, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5506.IH H5506

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5506 IH

1 ignated as the ‘‘Bishop Ralph E. Brower Post Office 

2 Building’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Bishop Ralph E. 

7 Brower Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5581 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5581

   To require the Secretary of the Interior to notify units of local 
 government when a Native American group files a petition to become a 
   federally recognized Indian tribe and before the decision on the 
               petition is made, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 2008

  Mr. Campbell of California introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of the Interior to notify units of local 
 government when a Native American group files a petition to become a 
   federally recognized Indian tribe and before the decision on the 
               petition is made, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--When a petition requesting that a tribe be 
recognized, acknowledged, or reacknowledged through the Federal 
acknowledgment process as a federally recognized Indian tribe is filed 
with the Department of the Interior, the Secretary of the Interior, 
acting through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, shall notify in writing 
units of local government as follows:
            (1) Notification that a petition was filed and is still 
        pending on the date of the enactment of this Act shall be made 
        not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this 
        Act.
            (2) Notification that a petition has been filed on or after 
        the date of the enactment of this Act shall be made not later 
        than 60 days after the petition is filed.
            (3) Notification of that a decision on a petition will be 
        announced shall be made not later than 90 days before the 
        decision is announced.
    (b) Units of Local Government.--A unit of local government required 
to be notified under subsection (a)--
            (1) is local city, parish, or county government located 
        within a 25 mile radius of land--
                    (A) over which the Native American group would be 
                given jurisdiction by or pursuant to the petition;
                    (B) that would be taken into trust for the benefit 
                of the Native American group by or pursuant to the 
                petition; and
                    (C) ownership of which would be transferred to the 
                Native American group by or pursuant to the petition; 
                and
            (2) does not include any Indian tribe, school, or private 
        persons or entities.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit32.2

GLOBAL SIGNAL INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global SignalInc., (the "Company") on Form  10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, William T. Freeman, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/  William T. Freeman

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

William T. Freeman SeniorVice President and Chief Financial Officer May 13,2005

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to William T. Freeman and will beretained by Global Signal, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except tothe extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the "Exchange Act"). Suchcertification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference intoany filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specificallyincorporates it by reference.

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-21-00059-CV

D’SPAIN CONSTRUCTION L.L.C.,

Appellant

v.

George Samuel LUDOLF,

Appellees

From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20-274

Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 22, 2021

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the 

parties regarding the assessment of costs, we order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Internet Infinity, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George
      Morris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      July 15, 2008





*/s/
                George Morris*George
                MorrisChief
                Financial
                Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Internet Infinity, Inc. and will be retained by Internet Infinity, Inc. and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.


Exhibit
        32.2
 Page
        1 of
        1 Page
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5548 

To provide for the continued availability of automated stamp vending machines at facilities of the United States Postal Service serving underserved communities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2008 

Mr. COHEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee 

on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide for the continued availability of automated stamp 

vending machines at facilities of the United States Postal 

Service serving underserved communities, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Postal Service Access 

5 Assurance Act of 2008’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 5548 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO AUTOMATED STAMP VENDING MA2 CHINES. 

3 The United States Postal Service shall take such ac4 tion as may be appropriate to ensure that, to the max5 imum extent practicable, automated stamp vending ma6 chines are provided at all facilities which— 

7 (1) are owned by or under the control of the 

8 United States Postal Service; and 

9 (2) provide retail services to the public. 

10 SEC. 3. EXCLUSION FROM PROVISIONS REQUIRING AC11 CEPTANCE OF $1 COINS. 

12 Section 5112(p) of title 31, United States Code, is 

13 amended by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(6) EXCLUSION OF AUTOMATED STAMP VENDING

15 MACHINES.—None of the requirements of this subsection 

16 shall apply with respect to automated stamp vending ma17 chines located on any premises owned by or under the con18 trol of the United States Postal Service.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

459 

KA 12-00214 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

NICOLE HARTMAN-MCMURRAY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

NORMAN P. EFFMAN, PUBLIC DEFENDER, WARSAW (GREGORY A. KILBURN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

DONALD G. O’GEEN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, WARSAW (MARSHALL A. KELLY OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Michael F.

Griffith, J.), rendered October 4, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon her plea of guilty, of aggravated driving while

intoxicated. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is 

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her

upon her plea of guilty of felony aggravated driving while intoxicated

(Vehicle and Traffic Law §§ 1192 [2], [2-a] [b]; 1193 [1] [c] [i]

[B]). The record establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily

and intelligently waived the right to appeal (see generally People v

Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256), and that valid waiver forecloses any

challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence (see id. at

255; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v

Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: April 26, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
IN RE C.C.

No. COA05-1532.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 5, 2006.

Certification Date July 25, 2006.

Appeal from Alamance (04J137, 04J138).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
**Exhibit 4.2 **

 

CONSENT OF ENGINEER

****Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2007 (the “Annual Report”) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the “Company”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

I hereby consent to the references to my name under the heading “Item III– General Development of the Business – 3.3. The Poste Lemoyne Extension Property” in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2007 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report), with respect to the Poste Lemoyne Extension property, and to all other references to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.

Very truly yours, 

/s/ Christian D’Amours Name: Christian D’Amours Title: Geologist 

May 25, 2007 

>
STATE v. AUMAN.

No. COA05-836.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS55827, 03CRS37601).

Case without published opinion. No error.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 130 (Friday, July 8, 2022)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 40707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14709]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 40707]]

                Proclamation 10421 of July 5, 2022

                
Honoring the Victims of the Tragedy in Highland 
                Park, Illinois

                By the President of the United States of America

                A Proclamation

                As a mark of respect for the victims of the senseless 
                acts of gun violence perpetrated on our Independence 
                Day, July 4, 2022, in Highland Park, Illinois, by the 
                authority vested in me as President of the United 
                States by the Constitution and the laws of the United 
                States of America, I hereby order that the flag of the 
                United States shall be flown at half-staff at the White 
                House and upon all public buildings and grounds, at all 
                military posts and naval stations, and on all naval 
                vessels of the Federal Government in the District of 
                Columbia and throughout the United States and its 
                Territories and possessions until sunset, July 9, 2022. 
                I also direct that the flag shall be flown at half-
                staff for the same length of time at all United States 
                embassies, legations, consular offices, and other 
                facilities abroad, including all military facilities 
                and naval vessels and stations.

                IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 
                fifth day of July, in the year of our Lord two thousand 
                twenty-two, and of the Independence of the United 
                States of America the two hundred and forty-seventh.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

[FR Doc. 2022-14709
Filed 7-7-22; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3395-F2-P
Opinion issued August 1, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NOS. 01-24-00556-CR

———————————

IN RE KEYLIN DAVEYON HOLLINS, RELATOR

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, an inmate in the Harris County Jail who is currently facing capital 

murder charges, has filed this pro se petition for writ of mandamus complaining that 

the trial court should dismiss the charges against him because “the evidence 

conclusively, and rationally (sic) inferences can establish reasonable doubt.”

1

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Keylin Daveyon Hall, cause number

1802366, pending in the 351st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the 

Honorable Natalia Cornelio, presiding.
2

We deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We 

dismiss any pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Hightower, Rivas-Molloy, and Farris.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7452** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. KENDINYA DEWALTERELL HALL, a/k/a Keon, a/k/a Boosie, a/k/a KenBob , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith , Chief District Judge. ( 2:09

- cr - 00117

- RBS

- DEM

- 1; 2:16

- cv - 00352

- RBS )

Submitted : February 23 , 2017 Decided: February 28, 2017

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Geremy C. Kamens, Federal Public Defender, Nicholas John Xenakis, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant . Alan Mark Salsbury, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kendinya Dewalterell Hall seeks to appeal the district court’s order d ismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion as untimely filed . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial sh owing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessmen t of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both tha t the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hall has not made the requisit e showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the d ecisional process.
DISMISSED
IN RE M.E.W.

No. COA06-38.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 5, 2006.

Certification Date September 25, 2006.

Appeal from New Hanover (05J168).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5478 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5478

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
To provide for the continued minting and issuance of certain $1 coins in 
                                  2008.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That clause (i) of 
section 5112(n)(1)(B) of title 31, United States Code (as in effect on 
the day before the date of the enactment of Public Law 110-82) shall 
continue in effect, notwithstanding the amendment made by section 3 of 
Public Law 110-82, until the effective date of the amendment made by 
section 2 of such Public Law.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```