alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      13,894,481
<SECURITIES>                                13,285,322
<RECEIVABLES>                               88,301,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,426,824
<INVENTORY>                                 18,607,062
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           146,246,285
<PP&E>                                      45,035,157
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,462,991
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             248,367,538
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       61,356,768
<BONDS>                                     39,346,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       215,848
<OTHER-SE>                                 144,280,416
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               248,367,538
<SALES>                                    254,542,779
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           254,542,779
<CGS>                                      164,290,540
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              164,290,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            67,021,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,242,355
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,382,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,464,467
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,352,931
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         13,111,536
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,325,471)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,786,065
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.59


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**  **AND**  **CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT
      OF 2002**




I,
      Philip
      J. Young, President and Chief Executive Officer of Osteologix, Inc., certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
      Osteologix, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Osteologix, Inc.




May
      10,
      2007




By:
            /s/ PHILIPJ.
              YOUNGPhilip
                J. Young
              President
                and Chief Executive Officer




I,
      Matthew M. Loar, Chief Financial Officer of Osteologix, Inc., certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Osteologix, Inc. for the
      quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Osteologix, Inc.




May
      10,
      2007


By:
              /s/ MATTHEW
                M. LOARMatthew
                    M. Loar
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014 (the "Report") of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the "Registrant"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, GREGORY H. HUNT, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








By: /s/ Gregory W. HuntName: Gregory W. HuntDate: August 7, 2014
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5232 

To provide that no Federal or State requirement to increase energy efficient 

lighting in public buildings shall require a hospital, school, day care 

center, mental health facility, or nursing home to install or utilize such 

energy efficient lighting if the lighting contains mercury. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2008 

Mr. BURGESS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that no Federal or State requirement to increase 

energy efficient lighting in public buildings shall require 

a hospital, school, day care center, mental health facility, 

or nursing home to install or utilize such energy efficient 

lighting if the lighting contains mercury. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MERCURY-CONTAINING LIGHTING. 

4 (a) AMENDMENT.—Title III of the Energy Independ5 ence and Security Act of 2007 is amended by adding at 

6 the end the following new section: 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5232 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 326. MERCURY-CONTAINING LIGHTING. 

2 ‘‘Notwithstanding sections 321 through 325, and the 

3 amendments made by those sections, no Federal or State 

4 requirement to increase energy efficient lighting in public 

5 buildings shall require a hospital, school, day care center, 

6 mental health facility, or nursing home to install or utilize 

7 such energy efficient lighting if the lighting contains mer8 cury.’’. 

9 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS AMENDMENT.—The table 

10 of contents for the Energy Independence and Security Act 

11 of 2007 is amended by adding at the end of the items 

12 relating to title III the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 326. Mercury-containing lighting.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Freddie
M. Kotek, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                                   /s/ Freddie M. Kotek
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Freddie M. Kotek
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   February 9, 2005
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

 

I, Gregg A. Ostrander, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s thirdfiscal quarter of 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 4, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance sheet of  MidAmerican  Energy  Company as of September 30,
1996, and the related  consolidated  statements of income and cash flows for the
nine months  ended  September  30,  1996,  and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,624,772
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    843,147
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         320,719
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       399,755
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 207,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,396,118
<COMMON>                                       801,442
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            442,593
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1,238,615
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          50,000
<PREFERRED>                                    77,534
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           1,372,007
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 157,728
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  77,624
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,422,610
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  4,396,118
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      1,333,740
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           79,662<F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     1,070,676
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     1,070,676
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        263,064
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             8,460<F2>
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 271,524
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       82,516
<NET-INCOME>                                   109,346
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    6,748
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  102,598
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       90,594
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      59,646
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         283,833
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.02
<FN>
<F1>Tag 37 includes operating and nonoperating income taxes and is excluded
from operating expenses in Tag 39 and on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
<F2>Tag 41 includes a $11,454,000 Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of
income taxes.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the Form****10-Q) of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (the “Company”), I, Ronald E. Baron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,****hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (a) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form l0-Q. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | /s/ Ronald E. Baron | Date: November 16, 2009 |
|--------|---------------------|-------------------------|

|   | Ronald E. Baron |
|--------|-----------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Cesario Urias, Cesario V. Urias, Joel Urias 

and Sonia Urias,

 

 Appellants,

v.

Owl Springs North, LLC, Owl Springs 

Holdings, LLC, and Barbara Prewit,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00063-CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas 

(TC# 19-11-23264-CVR)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellants’ fourth motion for extension of time within which to 

file the brief until December 31, 2021. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE THE APPELLANTS’ BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Eduardo N. Lerma, the Appellants’ attorney, prepare 

the Appellants’ brief and forward the same to this Court on or before December 31, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of December, 2021.

PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox and Alley, JJ.
#### Lou Mazzacone, Appellant, v Corlies Associates et al., Defendants, and Richard Strain et al., Respondents.

[802 NYS2d 182]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for violation of Labor Law § 740, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Sproat, J.), dated May 21, 2004, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Richard Strain and Charles J. Maneri, Jr., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, and denied his cross motion pursuant to CFLR 3212 (f) for further discovery.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To establish a cause of action under Labor Law § 740, commonly referred to as “the whistleblower’s statute” *(Lamagna v New York State Assn. for Help of Retarded Children,*158 AD2d 588, 589 [1990]), a plaintiff must plead and prove that his or her employer engaged in an activity, policy, or practice which violated a law, rule, or regulation that presented a substantial *1067and specific danger to the public health or safety *(see Bordell v General Elec. Co.,*88 NY2d 869, 871 [1996]; *Lamagna v New York State Assn. for Help of Retarded Children,*supra;*Leibowitz v Bank Leumi Trust Co. of N.Y.,*152 AD2d 169, 175-176 [1989]).

The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact to refute the prima facie showing by the respondents that they did not engage in any activity, policy, or practice which constituted an actual violation *(see Bordell v General Elec. Co., supra; Khan v State Univ. of N.Y. Health Science Ctr. at Brooklyn,*288 AD2d 350 [2001]).

Similarly, the respondents established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the cause of action to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress by demonstrating that their alleged conduct was not “ *‘so*outrageous in character and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community’ ” *(Fischer v Maloney,*43 NY2d 553, 557 [1978], quoting Restatement [Second] of Torts § 46 [1], Comment *d; see Freihofer v Hearst Corp.,*65 NY2d 135, 143 [1985]; *Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp.,*58 NY2d 293, 303 [1983]; *Sarlo v Fairchild Sons,*256 AD2d 322 [1998]). The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition to the respondents’ submissions on this issue *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the respondents’ motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

The plaintiffs remaining contention regarding the denial of his cross motion for further discovery has been rendered academic, and in any event, is without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brian F. Lavin, President and Chief Executive Officer of NTS RealtyCapital, Inc., the managing general partner of NTS Realty Holdings LimitedPartnership (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.                                       The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010(the “Report”), which accompanies this certificate, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | November  3, 2010                                   |     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Name:  | /s/  *Brian F. Lavin*                               | * * |
|   | Brian  F. Lavin                                     |     |
| Title: | President  and Chief Executive Officer of           |     |
|   | NTS  Realty Capital, Inc., the Managing General     |     |
|   | Partner  of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership |     |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
STATE v. JETER.

No. COA05-1292.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS61976).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1 

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer 

 

I, Gregg A. Ostrander, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s firstfiscal quarter of 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: May 14, 2004