40820 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 

affect the species or stock through 

effects on annual rates of recruitment or 

survival: 

• No mortality or serious injury is 

anticipated or will be authorized; 

• No Level A harassment is 

anticipated, even in the absence of 

mitigation measures, or authorized; 

• Foraging success is not likely to be 

significantly impacted as effects on 

species that serve as prey species for 

marine mammals from the survey are 

expected to be minimal; 

• The availability of alternate areas of 

similar habitat value for marine 

mammals to temporarily vacate the 

survey area during the planned survey 

to avoid exposure to sounds from the 

activity; 

• Take is anticipated to be by Level 

B behavioral harassment only, 

consisting of brief startling reactions 

and/or temporary avoidance of the 

survey area; 

• While the survey area is within 

areas noted as a migratory BIA for North 

Atlantic right whales, the activities will 

occur in such a comparatively small 

area such that any avoidance of the 

survey area due to activities will not 

affect migration. In addition, mitigation 

measures require shutdown at 500 m 

(almost four times the size of the Level 

B harassment isopleth (141 m)), which 

minimizes the effects of the take on the 

species; and, 

• The required mitigation measures, 

including visual monitoring and 

shutdowns, are expected to minimize 

potential impacts to marine mammals. 

Based on the analysis contained 

herein of the likely effects of the 

specified activity on marine mammals 

and their habitat, and taking into 

consideration the implementation of the 

required mitigation, monitoring, and 

reporting measures, NMFS finds that the 

total marine mammal take from 

NEETMA’s survey activities will have a 

negligible impact on all affected marine 

mammal species or stocks. 

Small Numbers 

As noted previously, only small 

numbers of incidental take may be 

authorized under sections 101(a)(5)(A) 

and (D) of the MMPA for specified 

activities other than military readiness 

activities. The MMPA does not define 

small numbers and so, in practice, 

where estimated numbers are available, 

NMFS compares the number of 

individuals taken to the most 

appropriate estimation of abundance of 

the relevant species or stock in our 

determination of whether an 

authorization is limited to small 

numbers of marine mammals. When the 

predicted number of individuals to be 

taken is fewer than one third of the 

species or stock abundance, the take is 

considered to be of small numbers. 

Additionally, other qualitative factors 

may be considered in the analysis, such 

as the temporal or spatial scale of the 

activities. 

NMFS proposes to authorize 

incidental take of 15 marine mammal 

species (with 16 managed stocks). The 

total amount of takes authorized relative 

to the best available population 

abundance is less than 8.5 percent for 

each stock which NMFS finds are small 

numbers of marine mammals relative to 

the estimated overall population 

abundances for those stocks (Table 3). 

Based on the analysis of the specified 

activity contained herein and in our 

Notice proposing issuance of the IHA 

(including the required mitigation and 

monitoring measures) and the 

anticipated take of marine mammals, 

NMFS finds that small numbers of 

marine mammals will be taken relative 

to the population size of the affected 

species or stocks. 

Unmitigable Adverse Impact Analysis 

and Determination 

There are no relevant subsistence uses 

of the affected marine mammal stocks or 

species implicated by this action. 

Therefore, NMFS has determined that 

the total taking of affected species or 

stocks will not have an unmitigable 

adverse impact on the availability of 

such species or stocks for taking for 

subsistence purposes. 

Endangered Species Act 

Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered 

Species Act of 1973 (ESA: 16 U.S.C. 

1531 et seq.) requires that each Federal 

agency insure that any action it 

authorizes, funds, or carries out is not 

likely to jeopardize the continued 

existence of any endangered or 

threatened species or result in the 

destruction or adverse modification of 

designated critical habitat. To ensure 

ESA compliance for the issuance of 

IHAs, NMFS Office of Protected 

Resources (OPR) consults internally 

whenever we propose to authorize take 

for endangered or threatened species. 

NMFS is authorizing the incidental 

take of four species of marine mammals 

which are listed under the ESA, 

including the North Atlantic right, fin, 

sei, and sperm whale, and has 

determined that these activities fall 

within the scope of activities analyzed 

in GARFO’s programmatic consultation 

regarding geophysical surveys along the 

U.S. Atlantic coast in the three Atlantic 

Renewable Energy Regions (completed 

June 29, 2021; revised September 2021). 

The consultation concluded that NMFS’ 

authorization of take incidental to these 

types of activities under the MMPA is 

not likely to adversely affect ESA-listed 

marine mammals. 

National Environmental Policy Act 

To comply with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and 

NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) 

216–6A, NMFS must review our action 

(i.e., the issuance of an IHA) with 

respect to potential impacts on the 

human environment. 

This action is consistent with 

categories of activities identified in 

Categorical Exclusion B4 (IHAs with no 

anticipated serious injury or mortality) 

of the Companion Manual for NOAA 

Administrative Order 216–6A, which do 

not individually or cumulatively have 

the potential for significant impacts on 

the quality of the human environment 

and for which we have not identified 

any extraordinary circumstances that 

will preclude this categorical exclusion. 

Accordingly, NMFS has determined that 

the issuance of the final IHA qualifies to 

be categorically excluded from further 

NEPA review. 

Authorization 

As a result of these determinations, 

NMFS has issued an IHA to NEETMA 

for conducting site characterization 

surveys off New Jersey from July 1, 2022 

through June 30, 2023, provided the 

previously mentioned mitigation, 

monitoring, and reporting requirements 

are incorporated. The final IHA and 

NEETMA’s IHA application can be 

found on NMFS’ website at https://

www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/ 

incidental-take-authorization-nexteraenergy-transmission-midatlanticholdings-llc-marine. 

Dated: July 5, 2022. 

Kimberly Damon-Randall, 

Director, Office of Protected Resources, 

National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14569 Filed 7–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XV188 

Request for Information on Industry 

Needs for Space Situational 

Awareness Data and Value-Added 

Services, and Related Liability 

Considerations 

AGENCY: Office of Space Commerce, 

Department of Commerce, National 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 40821 

Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration. 

ACTION: Notice; request for information 

(RFI). 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Department), via the Office 

of Space Commerce (OSC), requests 

input from all interested parties on 

spacecraft operator needs for U.S. 

government space situational awareness 

(SSA) data and basic spaceflight safety 

services; private sector concerns 

regarding usage rights for SSA data and 

products; and a framework for legal 

liability associated with the provision 

and use of SSA data and basic 

spaceflight safety services. This input 

will inform OSC’s development of 

capabilities to share SSA data and 

provide basic spaceflight safety services 

to all space operators. 

DATES: Responses are due on or before 

August 8, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Interested individuals and 

organizations should submit written 

comments on issues addressed in this 

Notice by either of the following 

methods: 

• Email: space.commerce@noaa.gov. 

Include the title of this request in the 

subject line of the message. 

Instructions: Response to this RFI is 

voluntary. Attachments will be accepted 

in plain text, Microsoft Word, or Adobe 

PDF formats only. Respondents need 

not reply to all questions listed. Each 

individual or institution is requested to 

submit only one response. All 

comments received are part of the 

public record and may be posted, 

without change, on a Federal website. 

All identifying information (e.g., name, 

address) submitted voluntarily by the 

sender will be publicly accessible. OSC, 

therefore, requests that no business 

proprietary information, copyrighted 

information, or personally identifiable 

information be submitted in response to 

this RFI. Please note that the United 

States Government will not pay for 

response preparation, or for the use of 

any information contained in the 

response. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Glenn E. Tallia, Chief, NOAA Office of 

General Counsel, Weather, Satellites, 

and Research Section, (301) 938–6474. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

As described in Space Policy 

Directive-3 (83 FR 28969; June 21, 2018) 

and the 2021 United States Space 

Priorities Framework (https://

www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/ 

uploads/2021/12/United-States-SpacePriorities-Framework-_-December-1- 

2021.pdf), OSC is developing the 

capability to share space situational 

awareness (SSA) data and provide basic 

spaceflight safety services to all space 

operators, including conjunction 

analysis and warning services. OSC may 

leverage data, products, and services 

provided from a variety of government, 

commercial, academic, and 

international sources, taking over and 

potentially expanding upon the service 

currently provided by the Department of 

Defense. 

OSC seeks public input broadly from 

the space community, including 

spacecraft operators, SSA data providers 

(current and prospective, ground and 

space-based), SSA analytic and valueadded service providers, academia, 

nonprofit entities, space insurance 

providers, and the legal community. 

OSC greatly appreciated responses to 

prior requests for information, including 

its request for information about 

‘‘Commercial Capabilities in Space 

Situational Awareness Data and Space 

Traffic Management Services’’ in April 

2019 and ‘‘Space Object Commercial 

Data’’ in February 2022. In addition, 

OSC has conducted numerous Industry 

Day meetings with companies from 

November 2020 to January 2021 and 

provided an opportunity to respond to 

desired learning objectives from a 

Commercial Sprint Advanced Concept 

Training. In addition, OSC is currently 

engaged in a listening tour with satellite 

operators and commercial space 

situational awareness data providers to 

understand basic services they expect to 

see when OSC takes over the service 

currently provided by the Department of 

Defense. The responses help OSC better 

understand key aspects of current and 

future non-governmental space object 

commercial data, and advanced SSA 

services that exceed the basic 

spaceflight safety services described 

above. This request builds on that input 

and, in addition, requests comments on 

usage rights and liability concerns 

associated with OSC’s provision of SSA 

data and basic spaceflight safety 

services. 

II. Questions To Inform Development of 

the SSA Products and Services 

OSC seeks responses to four 

categories of questions, and invites any 

member of the public to provide input: 

A. Data, products, and services 

needed by spacecraft operators; 

B. Usage rights in data, products, and 

services needed and provided by 

spacecraft operators and value-added 

providers; 

C. Framework for legal liability of 

spacecraft operators and the private 

sector; and 

D. General feedback. 

Respondents are encouraged to 

explain how the capabilities to be 

provided by OSC’s SSA data and basic 

spaceflight safety services can be 

structured for a policy and regulatory 

environment that enables a competitive 

and burgeoning U.S. commercial space 

sector. Responses may also explain how 

the U.S. Government can work with 

industry and international partners in 

the development and implementation of 

open, transparent, and credible 

international standards, policies, and 

practices that establish the foundation 

for global space traffic coordination. 

A. Data, Products, and Services Needed 

by Spacecraft Operators 

Prior requests for information have 

informed OSC on the specific 

capabilities commercial entities could 

currently provide and could provide in 

the future through an open architecture 

data repository that provides SSA data 

and basic spaceflight safety services. 

OSC is seeking to supplement this 

information by learning which SSA data 

and basic spaceflight safety services 

should be provided by OSC as a 

government service to spacecraft 

operators based on the most current 

needs of spacecraft operators. 

Currently OSC is planning to develop 

a public catalog of tracked space objects 

and provide basic spaceflight safety 

services at no cost to satellite owners 

and operators, commercial service 

providers, and the public, including 

international participants. There are 

multiple basic services currently under 

consideration. First, OSC would provide 

on-orbit orbital safety assessments that 

include ephemeris and tracking-based 

conjunction assessment screenings, 

conjunction data message production 

with a calculated likelihood of collision 

probability, orbital determination 

quality assessment, timing of any future 

expected tracking, and pre-maneuver 

ephemeris screening. Second, OSC 

would provide end-of-life reentry 

assessments that estimate both the 

actual decay time and the ellipse of 

possible earth impact as satellites 

approach decay. Third, OSC would 

provide pre-launch coordination and 

launch coordination such as launch 

collision avoidance assessments, and 

disposal and reentry of launch detritus 

assessments. Finally, OSC would 

provide evaluations of satellite owner 

and operator data before such data’s use 

in conjunction assessments. 

OSC invites public comment on the 

scope of those SSA data and basic 

spaceflight safety services and on 

whether additional services from OSC 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
40822 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 

would be of value to spacecraft 

operators. 

B. Usage Rights in Acquired Data, 

Products, and Services 

OSC sought public input on its plans 

to procure SSA data on February 16, 

2022 (https://sam.gov/opp/ 

7611eabcd5a74979a267199ea8689de2/ 

view), and will be seeking detailed 

public input later this year on the 

potential procurement of SSA products 

and services. This input will help OSC 

understand what data and products the 

private sector can provide. OSC may 

also obtain SSA data from spacecraft 

operators. OSC now seeks public input 

regarding the usage rights for the 

acquired data and products. OSC is 

inviting comments addressing what 

usage and sharing rights for acquired 

SSA data, products, and services will 

enable spacecraft operators and valueadded service providers to best rely on 

OSC’s data and basic spaceflight safety 

services. OSC also invites comments 

regarding how usage rights will impact 

those providing commercial SSA data or 

products to OSC. Furthermore, OSC 

invites comment on the following 

questions: 

(1) For value-added service providers, 

what type of usage rights in SSA data 

and products would enable use of such 

data and products to build advanced 

SSA services beyond basic spaceflight 

safety services? For example, would a 

condition prohibiting commercial use 

be problematic? Name specific 

acceptable data licenses if known (e.g., 

Creative Commons Zero Universal 

Public Domain Dedication (CC0) 

(https://creativecommons.org/ 

publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode), 

Creative Commons Attribution 

International (CC BY 4.0) (https://

creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 

legalcode), Creative Commons 

Attribution-NonCommercial 

International (CC BY–NC 4.0) (https://

creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/ 

4.0/legalcode)). For spacecraft operators, 

what type of usage rights in SSA data 

and products, if any, are of value to rely 

on OSC’s SSA data and basic spaceflight 

safety services? 

(2) For value-added service providers, 

would access to the algorithms used to 

process SSA data and create products 

and services be helpful? If so, why, and 

what type of usage rights would enable 

use? Name specific acceptable software 

licenses, if known (e.g., CC0, Apache 2.0 

(https://www.apache.org/licenses/ 

LICENSE-2.0), MIT, GNU Lesser General 

Public License (LGPL) (https://

www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-3.0.en.html), 

GNU General Public License (GPL) 

(https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl3.0.en.html), etc.). 

(3) For commercial data and product 

providers from whom OSC acquires 

SSA data and products, how would 

various usage rights in those data and 

products impact those commercial data 

and product providers? For example, are 

SSA data providers willing to provide 

data under an open license, but only at 

a significantly higher cost? 

(4) For spacecraft operators from 

whom OSC acquires data, how would 

various usage rights in those data 

impact spacecraft operators? For 

example, are spacecraft operators 

willing to share some data only on the 

condition that it is not shared with the 

public, or only shared with the public 

on the condition that it is used for 

noncommercial purposes? 

(5) Are non-Federal entities 

developing SSA products and services 

willing to share their algorithms with 

OSC, either freely or under a 

procurement contract? Would they be 

willing to share their algorithms with 

the public, either freely or if OSC 

procures public sharing and use rights? 

If so, under what usage rights (name 

specific acceptable software licenses, if 

applicable)? 

C. Framework for Legal Liability of 

Spacecraft Operators and the Private 

Sector 

OSC is evaluating the legal liability 

implications associated with the 

provision of governmental SSA data and 

basic spaceflight safety services. In this 

context, OSC is seeking information to 

consider whether the provision of 

governmental SSA data and basic 

spaceflight safety services that 

incorporate industry data or products 

raises liability concerns for those 

providing the relied on data or products. 

OSC is also seeking public input on 

whether there are liability concerns 

with respect to spacecraft operators or 

value-added providers that rely on 

governmental SSA data and basic 

spaceflight safety services. 

By ‘‘liability framework,’’ OSC means 

the set of legal rules that govern—or 

could govern—liability for a collision. 

In some of the questions below, OSC 

asks what the current liability 

framework is. OSC wants to ensure that 

it has accurate, comprehensive 

information about the current state of 

the world faced by parties involved in 

providing or using SSA or spaceflight 

safety services. In other questions, OSC 

asks what the liability framework could 

or should be in the future to address any 

potential liability issue. Responders are 

encouraged to think about liability 

broadly and consider mechanisms such 

as disclaimers of warranty, indemnity, 

immunity, cross-waivers of liability, and 

others. OSC invites general responses 

regarding legal liability. Furthermore, 

OSC has identified the following 

questions: 

(1) In the event of an on-orbit 

collision between two U.S. spacecraft 

operators, what liability framework 

currently applies and what role, if any, 

would governmental SSA data or basic 

spaceflight safety services play in that 

framework? What liability framework 

should apply? What incentives or 

regulatory approaches to liability will 

increase competitiveness of U.S. 

industry in the global market and 

increase spaceflight safety? 

(2) In the event of an on-orbit 

collision between a U.S. spacecraft 

operator and a foreign spacecraft 

operator, what liability framework 

currently applies and what role, if any, 

would governmental SSA data or basic 

spaceflight safety services play in that 

framework? What liability framework 

should apply? What incentives or 

regulatory approaches to liability will 

increase competitiveness of U.S. 

industry in the global market and 

increase spaceflight safety? 

(3) In the event of an on-orbit 

collision, what insurance regimes are 

available to U.S. spacecraft operators? 

What liability mechanisms (e.g., crosswaiver of liability provisions) can 

provide stability and risk assurance to 

both insurers and U.S. spacecraft 

operators? What role can or should 

governmental SSA data or basic 

spaceflight safety services play in 

insurance regimes? 

(4) Are there any liability concerns 

that would prevent spacecraft operators 

or commercial SSA data, product, or 

service providers from providing data, 

products, or services to OSC? Are there 

liability concerns caused by OSC 

creating derived or value-added data, 

products, or services developed using 

the provider’s data, products, or 

services? If so, what could be done to 

address these concerns? With respect to 

SSA data, products and services 

released to the public, would the 

disclaimers included in standard open 

data licenses (such as CC0 or CC BY 4.0) 

adequately address those liability 

concerns? 

(5) Are there any liability concerns 

that would prevent spacecraft operators 

or commercial SSA data, product, or 

service providers from providing SSA 

data, products, or services to the public? 

What incentives or regulatory 

approaches to liability will be in the 

best interest of U.S. spacecraft operators 

and value-added providers in terms of 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 40823 

international competitiveness and 

increased spaceflight safety? 

(6) Currently, OSC does not have 

specific space traffic control authority 

over space objects. What, if any, future 

space traffic control regimes would be 

desirable? Should provision of OSC SSA 

data or basic spaceflight safety services 

be accompanied with binding directions 

or procedures to spacecraft operators? 

What impact, if any, would such 

directions or procedures have on 

liability for U.S. spacecraft operators or 

value-added service providers? 

D. General Feedback 

OSC welcomes feedback about any 

other related topics. For example, are 

there any matters not discussed above 

that OSC should or must consider before 

it provides SSA data and basic 

spaceflight safety services? 

III. How To Submit Your Response 

To facilitate review of your responses, 

please reference the subject of the RFI 

in your response. You may respond to 

some or all of the topic areas covered in 

the RFI, and you can suggest other 

factors or relevant questions. You may 

also include links to online material or 

interactive presentations. If including 

data sets, please make the data available 

in a downloadable, machine-readable 

format with accompanying metadata. 

Please note that this is a request for 

information (RFI) only. In accordance 

with the implementing regulations of 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), specifically 5 CFR 1320.3(h)(4), 

this general solicitation is exempt from 

the PRA. Facts or opinions submitted in 

response to general solicitations of 

comments from the public, published in 

the Federal Register or other 

publications, regardless of the form or 

format thereof, provided that no person 

is required to supply specific 

information pertaining to the 

commenter, other than that necessary 

for self-identification, as a condition of 

the agency’s full consideration, are not 

generally considered information 

collections and therefore not subject to 

the PRA. 

This RFI is issued solely for 

information and planning purposes; it 

does not constitute a request for 

proposals, applications, proposal 

abstracts, or quotations. This RFI does 

not commit the U.S. Government to 

contract for any supplies or services or 

make a grant award. Further, we are not 

seeking proposals through this RFI and 

will not accept unsolicited proposals. 

Choosing not to respond to this RFI does 

not preclude participation in any future 

procurement, if conducted. 

Dated: July 1, 2022. 

Glenn E. Tallia, 

Chief, Weather, Satellite and Research 

Section, NOAA Office of General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14516 Filed 7–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–HR–P 

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM 

PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR 

SEVERELY DISABLED 

Procurement List; Deletions 

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From 

People Who Are Blind or Severely 

Disabled. 

ACTION: Deletions from the Procurement 

List. 

SUMMARY: This action deletes service(s) 

from the Procurement List that were 

furnished by nonprofit agencies 

employing persons who are blind or 

have other severe disabilities. 

DATES: Date deleted from the 

Procurement List: August 7, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase 

From People Who Are Blind or Severely 

Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 

715, Arlington, Virginia, 22202–4149. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 

785–6404 or email CMTEFedReg@

AbilityOne.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Deletions 

On 9/10/2021, 9/17/2021, 12/10/2021, 

and 12/17/2021, the Committee for 

Purchase From People Who Are//Blind 

or Severely Disabled published notice of 

proposed deletions from the 

Procurement List. This notice is 

published pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 8503 

(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51–2.3. After 

consideration of the relevant matter 

presented, the Committee has 

determined that the product(s) and 

service(s) listed below are no longer 

suitable for procurement by the Federal 

Government under 41 U.S.C. 8501–8506 

and 41 CFR 51–2.4. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 

I certify that the following action will 

not have a significant impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The major factors considered for this 

certification were: 

1. The action will not result in 

additional reporting, recordkeeping or 

other compliance requirements for small 

entities. 

2. The action may result in 

authorizing small entities to furnish the 

product(s) and service(s) to the 

Government. 

3. There are no known regulatory 

alternatives which would accomplish 

the objectives of the Javits-WagnerO’Day Act (41 U.S.C. 8501–8506) in 

connection with the product(s) and 

service(s) deleted from the Procurement 

List. 

End of Certification 

Accordingly, the following product(s) 

and service(s) are deleted from the 

Procurement List: 

Service(s) 

Service Type: Administrative Services 

Mandatory for: Internal Revenue Service 

Mailroom: 1100 Commerce Street, 

Dallas, TX 

Designated Source of Supply: Dallas 

Lighthouse for the Blind, Inc., Dallas, TX 

Contracting Activity: TREASURY, 

DEPARTMENT OF THE, DEPT OF 

TREAS/ 

Service Type: Administrative Services 

Mandatory for: Internal Revenue Service 

Collections Department: 1100 Commerce 

Street, Dallas, TX 

Designated Source of Supply: Dallas 

Lighthouse for the Blind, Inc., Dallas, TX 

Contracting Activity: TREASURY, 

DEPARTMENT OF THE, DEPT OF 

TREAS/ 

Service Type: Custodial service 

Mandatory for: White Mountain National 

Forest, Saco Ranger Administrative Site, 

Routes 112, 33 Kancamagus Highway, 

Conway, NH 

Designated Source of Supply: Northern New 

England Employment Services, Portland, 

ME 

Contracting Activity: FOREST SERVICE, 

ALLEGHENY NATIONAL FOREST 

Service Type: Laundry Service 

Mandatory for: Virginia Army National 

Guard, Central Issue Facility, Defense 

Supply Center Richmond Warehouse 15, 

8000 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Richmond, 

VA 

Designated Source of Supply: Louise W. 

Eggleston Center, Inc., Norfolk, VA 

Contracting Activity: DEPT OF THE ARMY, 

W7N5 USPFO ACTIVITY VA ARNG 

Service Type: Custodial service 

Mandatory for: US Department of Energy, 

Jamestown Service Center, 8430 Country 

Club Street, Jamestown, ND 

Designated Source of Supply: Alpha 

Opportunities, Inc., Jamestown, ND 

Contracting Activity: ENERGY, 

DEPARTMENT OF, WESTERN–UPPER 

GREAT PLAINS REGION 

Michael R. Jurkowski, 

Acting Director, Business Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14572 Filed 7–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6353–01–P 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1