alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

 

**STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Form****10-Q) of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (the “Company”), I, Joseph D. Borgerding, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,****hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 
|   | (a) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
|   | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 
|   | /s/ Joseph D. Borgerding | Date: August 14, 2006                                                                         |
|--------|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Joseph D. Borgerding     |  
 

Chief Executive Officer

 
 

 

 

 

 

  |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Velda King, President and Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.









May 12, 2005

/s/Velda King



Date

Velda King,

President, C.E.O. and Director
STATE of North Carolina v. Ernest L. HERBIN.

No. 201P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Ernest L. Herbin, Pro Se.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Belinda J. Foster, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th day of April 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
STATE v. TAYLOR.

No. COA05-1535.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed August 15, 2006.

Certification Date September 5, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (03CRS50204).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. STAGECOACH VILLAGE, a North Carolina Non-Profit Corporation.

No. 529P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Hilda Burnett-Baker, John F. Oates, James Stanley, Jr., Assistant Attorney Generals, for Dept. of Transportation.

Shannon R. Joseph, Raleigh, Jeffrey K. Peraldo, Greensboro, for Stagecoach Village.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of January 2006 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*930"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
STATE v. GUSTUS.

No. COA05-1525.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed July 18, 2006.

Certification Date August 7, 2006.

Appeal from Pender (05CRS2923, 05CRS2924).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brian F. Lavin,President and Chief Executive Officer of NTS Realty Capital, Inc., themanaging general partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.                                       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 

 
| Dated: |     | May 8, 2008                                    |     |
|--------|----------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Name:  | * * | */s/ Brian F. Lavin*                                | * * |
|   |     | Brian F. Lavin                                      |     |
| Title: |     | President and Chief Executive Officer of            |     |
|   |     | NTS Realty Capital, Inc., the Managing General |     |
|   |     | Partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership  |     |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 22

- 00549

- CV

In re Juan Enriquez

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__ __ ___________________ ___________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Jus tices Triana and Smith

Filed: September 9 , 2022
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5664 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to update at least once every 

six years the plans and specifications for specially adapted housing furnished to veterans by the Secretary. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

HR 5664 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. REQUIREMENT FOR REGULAR UPDATES TO 

2 HANDBOOK FOR DESIGN FURNISHED TO VET3 ERANS ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIALLY ADAPTED 

4 HOUSING ASSISTANCE BY SECRETARY OF 

5 VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 Section 2103 of title 38, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘(a) PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.—The Secretary’’; 

10 and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub12 section: 

13 ‘‘(b) HANDBOOK FOR DESIGN.—The Secretary shall 

14 make available to veterans eligible for assistance under 

15 this chapter, without cost to the veterans, a handbook con16 taining appropriate designs for specially adapted housing. 

17 The Secretary shall update such handbook at least once 

18 every six years to take into account any new or unique 

19 disabilities, including vision impairments, impairments 

20 specific to the of upper limbs, and burn injuries.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
# L_2013117EN.01000601.xml

| 27.4.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 117/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 117/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 22 April 2013

on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of an Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation concerning cooperation on the application of their competition laws

(2013/203/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 103 and 352, in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 10 December 2010, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the Swiss Confederation concerning cooperation on the application of the competition laws of the Union and of the Swiss Confederation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 10 December 2010, the Council authorised the Commission to open negotiations with the Swiss Confederation concerning cooperation on the application of the competition laws of the Union and of the Swiss Confederation.

| (2) | The negotiations with the Swiss Confederation have been completed. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The negotiations with the Swiss Confederation have been completed.

| (3) | The Agreement should be signed subject to its conclusion, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement should be signed subject to its conclusion,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The signing of the Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation concerning cooperation on the application of their competition laws is hereby authorised on behalf of the Union, subject to the conclusion of the said Agreement (1).

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union subject to its conclusion.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 22 April 2013.

For the Council

The President

S. COVENEY

---

(1)  The text of the Agreement will be published together with the decision on its conclusion.

1

---
Exhibit 99
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                         FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE II

                              ALLSTAR SYSTEMS, INC.
                        VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                             AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1998
                                 (In Thousands)

<S>                                                     <C>          <C>         <C>        <C>    <C>     <C>
                                                     Balance at   Charges to   Charge to
                                                      Beginning   Costs and      Other       Other        Balance at
                    Description                        of Year     Expenses    Accounts     Changes        End of year

Accumulated provision  deducted from related assets on balance sheet:  Allowance
         for doubtful accounts receivable:
              1996.................................    $   464    $   890                 $ (1,135)  (A)  $  219
              1997.................................        219        386        (66)         (290)  (A)     249
              1998.................................        249      3,410                   (3,301)  (A)     358
         Inventory reserves:
              1996.................................    $   368    $   743                 $ (1,000)  (A)  $  111
              1997.................................        111        456                     (551)  (A)      16
              1998.................................         16      1,900                   (1,916)  (A)       0
Reserves other than those deducted from assets on balance  sheet:  Allowance for
         doubtful vendor accounts receivable:
              1996.................................    $   250     $   119                $   (169)  (A)  $  200
              1997.................................        200         198                     (49)  (A)     349
              1998.................................        349       1,049                  (1,243)  (A)     155

(A) Reductions related to amounts written off.
</TABLE>
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-5463-18

OMAR WILSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ANGEL R. BECERRIL, NETTY

C. HERNANDEZ, and ANGELO

& SON TRANS CORP.,

MAPFRE/U.S.A. CORP. and

AMERICAN COMMERCE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants,

and

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY,

Intervenor-Respondent.

____________________________

Submitted April 12, 2021 – Decided May 14, 2021

Before Judges Rothstadt and Mayer.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the 

internet, this opinion is binding only on the parties in the case and its use in other cases is limited. R. 1:36-3.
2

A-5463-18

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law 

Division, Essex County, Docket No. L-3798-16.

Epstein Ostrove, LLC, attorneys for appellant (Daniel 

N. Epstein, on the briefs).

Gurbir S. Grewal, Attorney General, intervenor for the 

State of New Jersey (Melissa H. Raksa, Assistant 

Attorney General, of counsel; Bryan Edward Lucas, 

Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

The court being advised by the parties in the above matter that the issues 

in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal is accordingly dismissed with 

prejudice and without costs to either party.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 4, 2023 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-23-00402-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF I.S., D.S., AND C.S., CHILDREN 

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-15-02087 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Smith 

Opinion by Justice Smith 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to 

our inquiry regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without 

a reporter’s record and for appellant’s brief to be filed by October 21, 2023. By 

postcard dated October 25, 2023, we informed appellant his brief was overdue and 

directed him to file his brief within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed his brief or otherwise 

corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8 (a)(1); 42.3(b), 

(c). 

230402F.P05 

 

/Craig Smith/

CRAIG SMITH 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF I.S., D.S., 

AND C.S., CHILDREN 

No. 05-23-00402-CV 

 On Appeal from the 301st Judicial 

District Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-15-02087. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith. 

Justices Molberg and Reichek 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered December 4, 2023
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
Hon. Julian Kantgrmery, Eay 8, 1939, Page 2 

i?entern Fubllc Service Co. v. Uharg, 

Seoretary of State, 2.38 Sk1 Ml, 292 

S'i 168 

It lof$3ally r0u0td6 and the oourts 0f Teata 

have held cansiatentlythat a foreign corpora? 

tlon must conduct ltaelf in accordmoe with the 

constitutional and statutory provlslcma 0r this 

atate. 

Southwestern Eke11 Telephone & Telegraph 

CO. V. City of Da1la8, l31 W 80, 

l34sd 321. 

3% y&l' v. ywn oroaerp fhqmly, 

m#leJr v* Bells9 'prr lo60 

'undex thm Jaw8 0r &a8 a oorprat%on 

raaybaSaroldfarmjr0oorgOFoQit~p~~ 

speaiiied in any 00 of the ~8ubdlvi8ba8 ti 8rlG 

ala lso8 of the Red8od Oivil statute8 of ss85& 

butito4umQt~e-rortwo0r~ptrrporre8 

aa 4a8lgnated in tm 01~ wre or the 8ubdlvl8lcam 

Rammyv.Tod,6968lS5 

~l6lYViBOlAS7SUlOBB 

The sewa zulo holdi with r&met to r0m.60 oorparatlawf 

fntha opiaiollorthlEde~tllo 

~UrpC8e'QtU8OOf thBathb.hESi8tQ810~~8 

ps~ttoctobu8kuMinT~,~h~~~e 

8OtfAt,daQ8nat.hO2.UibUW.tOsnnot bsoOn8tZk+ 

edto inelu& theoon8trWtlonoi et001 tJd&O8 

within ttd stat+
STATE v. JORDAN.

No. COA04-1080.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 5, 2005.

Certification Date July 25, 2005.

Appeal from the Guilford (03CRS79074).

Case without published opinion. No error.
CATER, et al. v. BARKER.

No. 546A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 30, 2006.

Ronald Stephen Patterson, Hayesville, for Cater and O'Connor.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of January 2006 by Defendant to Waive Oral Argument:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of January 2006."
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of T Bancshares, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Patrick G.
Adams, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry Purchal, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




T
      BANCSHARES, INC.




Date:
      May 15, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Patrick G. AdamsPatrick
      G. Adams
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                Principal
      Executive OfficerDate:
      May 15, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Terry PurchalTerry
      Purchal
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                Principal
      Financial Officer
Zoe SPENCER, Petitioner v. VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY, et al.

No. 19-30

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 15, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5492 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 332
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5492

                          [Report No. 110-545]

  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
   construct a greenhouse facility at its museum support facility in 
              Suitland, Maryland, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2008

  Ms. Matsui (for herself, Mr. Becerra, and Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

                             March 10, 2008

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
   construct a greenhouse facility at its museum support facility in 
              Suitland, Maryland, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION OF GREENHOUSE FACILITY.

    The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized 
to construct a greenhouse facility at its museum support facility in 
Suitland, Maryland, to maintain the horticultural operations of, and 
preserve the orchid collection held in trust by, the Smithsonian 
Institution.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated $12,000,000 to carry out 
this Act. Such sums shall remain available until expended.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 332

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5492

                          [Report No. 110-545]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to 
   construct a greenhouse facility at its museum support facility in 
              Suitland, Maryland, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 10, 2008

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```