alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5556 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5556

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain individuals 
      who have attained age 50 and who are unemployed to receive 
 distributions from qualified retirement plans without incurring a 10 
                        percent additional tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2008

  Mr. Platts introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain individuals 
      who have attained age 50 and who are unemployed to receive 
 distributions from qualified retirement plans without incurring a 10 
                        percent additional tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NO ADDITIONAL TAX ON DISTRIBUTIONS FROM QUALIFIED RETIREMENT 
              PLANS TO CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE ATTAINED AGE 50 AND 
              WHO ARE UNEMPLOYED.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 72(t) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to subsection not to apply to certain 
distributions) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(H) Distributions to certain individuals who have 
                attained age 50 and who are unemployed.--
                            ``(i) In general.--Distributions to an 
                        individual after separation from employment 
                        if--
                                    ``(I) as of the date of such 
                                distribution, such individual has 
                                attained age 50,
                                    ``(II) such individual has received 
                                unemployment compensation for 12 
                                consecutive weeks under any Federal or 
                                State unemployment compensation law by 
                                reason of such separation, and
                                    ``(III) such distribution is made 
                                during any taxable year during which 
                                such unemployment compensation is paid 
                                or any succeeding taxable year.
                            ``(ii) Reemployment and self-employment.--
                        Rules similar to the rules of clauses (ii) and 
                        (iii) of subparagraph (D) shall apply for 
                        purposes of this subparagraph.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to distributions made after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



    CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss.1350


     The undersigned hereby certifies that she is the duly appointed and acting
Chief Financial Officer of Big Dog Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), and hereby further certifies as follows.

   1.  The periodic report containing financial statements to which this
       certificate is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

   2.  The information contained in the periodic report to which this
       certificate is an exhibit fairly presents, in all material respects, the
       financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     In witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered this
certificate as of the date set forth opposite his signature below.



Date: March 31, 2005             /s/ Roberta J. Morris
                                 -----------------------
                                 Roberta J. Morris
                                 Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. PEAN.

No. COA05-647.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed March 7, 2006.

Certification Date March 27, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (03CRS249263, 03CRS249264, 03CRS249267, 03CRS249268, 03CRS249271)

Case without published opinion. No error in the trial, remanded for resentencing.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5428 

To direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to issue regulations requiring 

pilots of certain vessels to carry and utilize a portable electronic device 

equipped for navigational purposes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to issue 

regulations requiring pilots of certain vessels to carry 

and utilize a portable electronic device equipped for navigational purposes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vessel Navigation and 

5 Safety Improvement Act’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 5428 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR PILOTS TO CARRY AND UTILIZE 

2 PORTABLE ELECTRONIC NAVIGATIONAL DE3 VICE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Commandant of the Coast 

5 Guard shall issue regulations that— 

6 (1) require that any pilot licensed under sub7 title II of title 46, United States Code, while serving 

8 under the authority of that license as a pilot on a 

9 covered vessel, shall carry and utilize a portable elec10 tronic device that is— 

11 (A) equipped for navigational purposes; 

12 and 

13 (B) capable of being connected to an Auto14 matic Identification System, in accordance with 

15 the International Convention for the Safety of 

16 Life at Sea, Chapter V, Regulation 19.2; and 

17 (2) require such pilots to obtain training in the 

18 use of such electronic devices, and prescribe require19 ments for such training. 

20 (b) DEADLINES FOR COMPLIANCE.—The regulations 

21 shall require such pilots to— 

22 (1) carry and utilize electronic devices pursuant 

23 to subsection (a)(1) by no later than 18 months 

24 after the date of enactment of this Act; and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HR 5428 IH

1 (2) begin training pursuant to subsection (a)(2) 

2 by no later than 12 months after the date of the en3 actment of this Act. 

4 (c) EXEMPTIONS.—The Commandant may exempt a 

5 pilot from the requirement under subsection (a)(1) if the 

6 Commandant certifies that a portable electronic device is 

7 not necessary for the safe navigation of a covered vessel 

8 on the waters where the pilot operates. 

9 (d) COVERED VESSEL DEFINED.—In this section the 

10 term ‘‘covered vessel’’ means a self-propelled, commercial 

11 vessel of 300 gross tons or more. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






Board of Directors
SE Financial Corp.

We have  reviewed the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet of SE Financial
Corp.  and  subsidiary  as of January 31,  2006,  and the  related  consolidated
statements  of income for the  three-month  periods  ended  January 31, 2006 and
2005, and the consolidated  statement of changes in stockholders' equity for the
three-month  period ended January 31, 2006,  and the  consolidated  statement of
cash flows for the  three-month  periods ended January 31, 2006 and 2005.  These
consolidated  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of the  Company's
management.

We conducted  our review in  accordance  with  standards  of the Public  Company
Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States).  A review of  interim  financial
information consists principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with the  standards  of the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board,  the
objective  of which is the  expression  of an opinion  regarding  the  financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with U.S generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in  accordance  with the  standards of the Public
Company  Accounting  Oversight Board (United States),  the consolidated  balance
sheet as of October 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes  in  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented  herein);  and in our report  dated  December 9, 2005 we  expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



/s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
 March 16, 2006
MORRILL v. MORRILL

No. COA05-691

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Rowan (99CVD1394).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-90,330-01

EX PARTE WILLIAM HOSEA ENGLISH, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. B-17-0829-SA-W-1 IN THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TOM GREEN COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to thirty-five years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to an appeal. We remanded this application

to the trial court for a response from trial counsel and findings of fact and conclusions of law. The

trial court has determined that Applicant was denied his right to an appeal. We find that Applicant

is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in cause

number B-17-0829-SA from the 119th District Court of Tom Green County. Applicant is ordered
2

returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the

aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial

court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be

represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant

on direct appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date

on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an

appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30

days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: November 20, 2019

Do not publish
Gary Wayne HAYWOOD v. SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS, Theodis Beck and Superintendant, Lumberton Correctional Institution, George Kenworthy.

No. 650P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 23, 2005.

Gary W. Haywood, Pro Se.

Bill Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Plaintiff on the 22nd day of November 2005 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Robeson County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 23rd day of November 2005."
88 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

OKLAHOMA

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

By Type

Service: 80%

Construction: 5%

Research and 

Development: 0%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 15%

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions)

Boeing $718.7 M

AECOM $307.3 M

Patriot Team $198.2 M

Northrop Grumman $151.7 M

L-3 Communications $88.8 M

Chugach Alaska $61.2 M

Leonardo S.p.A. (Finmeccanica) $60.8 M

L3 Technologies $49.6 M

Computer Sciences Corporation $44.6 M

Professional Contract Services $36.7 M

$2.3

$2.7 $2.5

$2.1 $2.0 $2.0

$2.9

$2.5

20%

7%

63%

10%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.6 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

75,802

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 15%

Active Duty: 50%

Civilian: 35%

45%

4%

49%

2%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

Military

Comanche 30,231 26,490 2,989

Oklahoma 28,669 7,139 18,269

Jackson 3,139 1,619 1,376

Tulsa 2,977 57 973

Garfield 2,259 1,630 365

Pittsburg 2,061 ND 1,859

Cleveland 1,390 64 161

Canadian 1,011 13 21

Wagoner 826 24 23

Payne 483 17 12
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 89

Garfield 

Pittsburg

Tulsa 

Canadian

Comanche Cleveland

Jackson

Oklahoma 

Garfield 

Blaine

Pittsburg

Payne Tulsa 

Canadian

Comanche Cleveland

Jackson

Oklahoma 

Oklahoma County

$1.5 B

Comanche County

$644.4 M

Jackson County 

$137.5 M

Pittsburg County

$106.6 M

Tulsa County

$75.8 M

Garfield County

$75.7 M

Cleveland County

$19.5 M

Canadian County

$7.8 M

Muskogee County

$7.0 M

Wagoner County

$5.8 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions) (M=millions)

Oklahoma County

$1.8 B

Tulsa County

$427.1 M

Comanche County

$235.5 M

Garfield County

$129.3 M

Jackson County

$63.3 M

Pittsburg County

$48.4 M

Payne County

$27.1 M

Cleveland County

$20.6 M

Blaine County

$15.2 M

Canadian County

$13.7 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions)

#22

$5.5 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#12

3.0% OF STATE GDP

1.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$1,399

PER RESIDENT

#23

$2.9 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#12

75,802 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#13

$2.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 OKLAHOMA

Muskogee 

Wagoner 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active
exv10w1



 







Exhibit 10.1




DAVE & BUSTER’S, INC.




Restricted Stock

Grants To Named Executive Officers and Directors




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	Shares of
	Name of Grantee	 	Title	 	Restricted Stock
	James W. “Buster” Corley

	 	Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating
Officer and Director
	 	 	30,000	 
	David O. “Dave” Corriveau

	 	President and Director
	 	 	30,000	 
	William C. Hammett, Jr.

	 	Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	15,000	 
	Sterling R. Smith

	 	Senior Vice President, Dave & Buster’s Operations
	 	 	7,500	 
	J. Michael Plunkett

	 	Senior Vice President, Food Service Operations,

Jillian’s Operations
	 	 	10,000	 
	Peter A. Edison

	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	 	6,000	 
	Allen J. Bernstein

	 	Director
	 	 	4,000	 
	Walter J. Humann

	 	Director
	 	 	4,000	 
	Mark A. Levy

	 	Director
	 	 	4,000	 
	Christopher C. Maguire

	 	Director
	 	 	4,000	 
	David B. Pittaway

	 	Director
	 	 	4,000	 
	Patricia P. Priest

	 	Director
	 	 	4,000
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 128538 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 128538 

 COA: 251354 

Kalamazoo CC: 03-000786-FC 

OMAR ANTWAN WALKER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 1, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

CAMSOFT DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 

VERSUS

SOUTHERN ELECTRONICS SUPPLY, 

INC. AND ACTIVE SOLUTIONS, 

LLC

NO. 2022 CW 0320

JULY 5, 2022

In Re: MMR Group, Inc., MMR Offshore Services, Inc. and MMR

Constructors, Inc. d/ b/ a MMR Communications, applying

for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, 

Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 582741. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The district court' s March 10, 

2022 judgment, denying defendants/ relators, MMR Group, Inc. MMR

Offshore Services, Inc., and MMR Constructors Inc. d/ b/ a MMR

Communications', Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is vacated. 

As instructed by this court in CamSoft Data Systems, Inc. v. 

Southern Electronics Supply, Inc., 2019- 0733 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 

7/ 2/ 19), 2019 WL 2865361 ( unpublished), and in connection with

CamSoft Data Systems, Inc. v. Southern Electronics Supply, Inc., 

2022 CW 0321, issued this same date, the matter is remanded to

the district court to consider the merits of the referenced

motion for partial summary judgment in connection with their

analysis of the admissibility of the expert opinions of Chetan

Sharma, Stephen Dell, and Michael Kaplan. 

JEW

CHH

McClendon, J., concurs. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5486 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5486

 To expand the boundaries of the Little River Canyon National Preserve 
                        in the State of Alabama.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2008

  Mr. Rogers of Alabama (for himself and Mr. Aderholt) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the boundaries of the Little River Canyon National Preserve 
                        in the State of Alabama.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LITTLE RIVER CANYON NATIONAL PRESERVE BOUNDARY EXPANSION.

    Section 2 of the Little River Canyon National Preserve Act of 1992 
(16 U.S.C. 698q) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``The Preserve'' and inserting the 
                following:
            ``(1) In general.--The Preserve''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Boundary expansion.--The boundary of the Preserve is 
        modified to include the land depicted on the map entitled 
        `Little River Canyon National Preserve Proposed Boundary', 
        numbered 152/80,004, and dated July 31, 2007.''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``map'' and inserting 
        ``maps''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT
CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.



|      |  |                         
|----- |  | ------------------------
|      |  | /s/    RICHARD L. PETEKA
|Name: |  | Richard L. Peteka       
|Date: |  | February 5, 2009
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 
| I, Gregory A. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of NTS  Realty Capital, Inc., the managing general partner of NTS Realty  Holdings Limited Partnership (the “Company”), certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,  that: |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | 1. |   | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934 amended; and |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    | 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 

 
| Dated: | August 11, 2008                               |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | */s/ Gregory A. Wells*                             |   |
|   | Gregory A. Wells                                   |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer of                         |
|   | NTS Realty Capital Inc., the Managing General      |
|   | Partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----