alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2 

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer 

 

I, John D. Reedy, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Michael Foods, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

 

c) Disclosed in this report any changein the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s first fiscal quarter of 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

Date: May 14, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 136 (Monday, July 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42792]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15249]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11785]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: 
``B[aacute]migb[oacute]y[egrave]: A Master Sculptor of the 
Yor[ugrave]b[aacute] Tradition'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``B[aacute]migb[oacute]y[egrave]: A 
Master Sculptor of the Yor[ugrave]b[aacute] Tradition'' at the Yale 
University Art Gallery, New Haven, Connecticut, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural 
significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display 
within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. 
I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published 
in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d4a7b1b7a0bdbbbae6e0e1ed94a7a0b5a0b1fab3bba2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc8f999f88959392cec8c9c5bc8f889d8899d29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Stacy E. White,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-15249 Filed 7-15-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE of North Carolina v. Leonard Grover HALL.

No. 644P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Wesley E. Starnes, for Leonard Grover Hall.

*772Jeffrey R. Edwards, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 21st day of November 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of November 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
LAMBETH v. NORTH CAROLINA FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO.

No. COA05-287

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from New Hanover (00CVS3709).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# L_2012287EN.01002501.xml

| 18.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 287/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 287/25

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 771/2012 of 23 August 2012 making imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America subject to registration in application of Article 24(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 on protection against subsidised imports from countries not members of the European Community

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 229 of 24 August 2012
  )

On page 21, the first paragraph of Article 1(1) is replaced by the following:

‘1.   The Customs authorities are hereby directed, pursuant to Article 24(5) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009, to take the appropriate steps to register the imports into the Union of bioethanol, sometimes referred to as “fuel ethanol”, i.e. ethyl alcohol produced from agricultural products (as listed in Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), denatured or undenatured, excluding products with a water content of more than 0,3 % (m/m) measured according to the standard EN 15376, as well as ethyl alcohol produced from agricultural products (as listed in Annex I to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) contained in blends with gasoline with an ethyl alcohol content of more than 10 % (v/v) currently falling within CN codes ex 2207 10 00, ex 2207 20 00, ex 2208 90 99, ex 2710 12 11, ex 2710 12 15, ex 2710 12 21, ex 2710 12 25, ex 2710 12 31, ex 2710 12 41, ex 2710 12 45, ex 2710 12 49, ex 2710 12 51, ex 2710 12 59, ex 2710 12 70, ex 2710 12 90, ex 3814 00 10, ex 3814 00 90, ex 3820 00 00 and ex 3824 90 97 (TARIC codes 2207100011, 2207200011, 2208909911, 2710121110, 2710121510, 2710122110, 2710122591, 2710123110, 2710124110, 2710124510, 2710124910, 2710125110, 2710125910, 2710127010, 2710129010, 3814001010, 3814009070, 3820000010 and 3824909767) and originating in the United States of America. Registration shall expire nine months following the date of entry into force of this Regulation.’.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Jack L. Alexander, Senior Vice President of MidAmerican Energy Company (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004  (the Report)  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 
 (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated: May 4, 2004
 
 
 /s/ Jack L. Alexander
 Jack L. Alexander
 Senior Vice President
 (co-chief executive officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00075-CV 

GURPREET KAUR APPELLANT

V. 

DALJIT SAINI APPELLEE

------------ 

FROM THE 325TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY 

TRIAL COURT NO. 325-547630-13 

------------ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------ 

We have considered appellant’s “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” It is the 

court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). 

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d). 

 PER CURIAM 

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: April 14, 2016 

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-15008]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy hereby gives 
notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of 
National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science 
Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: Friday, July 15, 2022, from 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: This meeting will be held by teleconference through the National 
Science Foundation.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda of the teleconference is: 
Committee Chair's introductory remarks; remarks by the NSF Director; 
discussion of NSF investments to strengthen established NSF; updates on 
missing millions efforts and TIP; discussion of strategies to deliver 
benefits in the context of the FY 2024 and beyond budget development 
process; and the NSF--NSB budget engagement plan.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Kathy Jacquart, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#670c0d0616120615132709140149000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="365d5c5747435744427658455018515940">[email protected]</span></a> (703) 292-7000. Meeting 
information and updates may be found at www.nsf.gov/nsb.

Chris Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2022-15008 Filed 7-11-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# L_2017280EN.01005701.xml

| 28.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 280/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 280/57

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 167 of 27 June 2012
  )

On page 50, Annex I, Category 6, third line of the table:

for:

| EC number | Name/group | Restriction | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘250-753-6 | (Z,E)-Tetradec-9,12-dienyl acetate’ | | |

EC number

Name/group

Restriction

Comment

‘250-753-6

(Z,E)-Tetradec-9,12-dienyl acetate’

read:

| EC number | Name/group | Restriction | Comment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ‘Not available | (9Z,12E)-tetradeca-9,12-dien-1-yl acetate | | CAS 30507-70-1’ |

EC number

Name/group

Restriction

Comment

‘Not available

(9Z,12E)-tetradeca-9,12-dien-1-yl acetate

CAS 30507-70-1’

---
STATE v. WALL.

No. COA05-898.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 2, 2006.

Certification Date May 22, 2006.

Appeal from Richmond (04CRS50537).

Case without published opinion. New trial.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 566 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 566

To waive the time limitations specified by law for the award of certain 
  military decorations in order to allow the posthumous award of the 
 Medal of Honor to Doris Miller for actions while a member of the Navy 
                          during World War II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2007

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, 
   Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Cummings, Mr. 
Jefferson, Mr. Payne, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, 
  Mr. Edwards, and Mr. Wynn) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To waive the time limitations specified by law for the award of certain 
  military decorations in order to allow the posthumous award of the 
 Medal of Honor to Doris Miller for actions while a member of the Navy 
                          during World War II.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS ON AWARD OF MEDAL OF HONOR TO 
              DORIS MILLER FOR VALOR AS A MEMBER OF THE NAVY DURING 
              WORLD WAR II.

    The time limitations specified in section 6248(a) of title 10, 
United States Code, shall not apply with respect to the posthumous 
award of the Medal of Honor under section 6241 of such title to Doris 
Miller (service number 356-12-35) for acts of heroism during World War 
II while a member of the United States Navy.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2022181DE.01003801.xml

| 7.7.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 181/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 181/38

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 748/2012 der Kommission vom 3. August 2012 zur Festlegung der Durchführungsbestimmungen für die Erteilung von Lufttüchtigkeits- und Umweltzeugnissen für Luftfahrzeuge und zugehörige Produkte, Bau- und Ausrüstungsteile sowie für die Zulassung von Entwicklungs- und Herstellungsbetrieben

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 224 vom 21. August 2012
  )

Seite 18, Anhang I Teil 21 Hauptabschnitt A Abschnitt B Punkt 21.A.19:

Anstatt:

„Natürliche oder juristische Personen, die an einem Produkt Reparaturen vorzunehmen beabsichtigen, müssen eine neue Musterzulassung beantragen, wenn die Änderungen in der Konstruktion, der Leistung, dem Schub oder der Masse nach Ansicht der Agentur so erheblich sind, dass eine praktisch vollständige Prüfung auf Einhaltung der einschlägigen Basis der Musterzulassung erforderlich ist.“

muss es heißen:

„Natürliche oder juristische Personen, die an einem Produkt Reparaturen vorzunehmen beabsichtigen, müssen eine neue Musterzulassung beantragen, wenn die Änderungen an Konstruktion, Leistung, Schub oder Masse nach Bewertung der Agentur so umfassend sind, dass eine substanziell vollständige Prüfung auf Einhaltung der anwendbaren Musterzulassungsgrundlage erforderlich ist.“

Seite 48, Anhang I Teil 21 Hauptabschnitt A Abschnitt O Punkt 21.A.611 Buchstabe b Satz 1:

Anstatt:

„Alle Konstruktionsänderungen durch den Inhaber der ETSO-Zulassung, die aufgrund ihres Umfangs eine praktisch vollständige Untersuchung zur Prüfung auf Einhaltung einer ETSO erfordern, sind erhebliche Änderungen.“

muss es heißen:

„Alle Konstruktionsänderungen durch den Inhaber der ETSO-Zulassung, die aufgrund ihres Umfangs eine substanziell vollständige Untersuchung zur Prüfung auf Einhaltung einer ETSO erfordern, sind erhebliche Änderungen.“

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Carlos Rodriquez HALL.

No. 63P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for Carlos R. Hall.

Karen E. Long, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 8th day of February 2006 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2006."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bobby Simmons, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 179]

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), rendered November 22, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the third degree and attempted petit larceny.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the third degree (Penal Law § 140.20) and attempted petit larceny (§§ 110.00, 155.25). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that County Court committed reversible error in precluding his sole proposed witness from testifying on the ground that the testimony constituted a collateral attack on the credibility of a prosecution witness *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, that contention is without merit because defendant was thereby attempting to “introduce extrinsic evidence on a collateral matter solely to impeach credibility” *(People v Alvino,*71 NY2d 233, 247 [1987]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Pine, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5120 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5120

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fenamidone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2008

 Mr. Hulshof introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fenamidone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FENAMIDONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.38 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Fenamidone) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 6.2 **

  

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

** **In connection with the annual report on Form 40-F of Virginia Mines Inc. for the year ended February 28, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. 

Date: May 29, 2007 

/s/ Gaétan Mercier Gaétan Mercier Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
WILLIAMS v. INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 712PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 15, 2006.

George L. Simpson, III, Raleigh, for Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co.

Matthew S. Sullivan, Thomas J. White, III, Kinston, Gregory E. Floyd, for Debbie & Ashley Williams.

Jodee S. Larcade, Raleigh, for NC Assoc. of Defense Attorneys.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of May 2006 by NC Association of Defense Attorneys for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 15th day of May 2006."
STATE v. EDGE.

No. COA05-328.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Cumberland (99CRS72607, 99CRS72612, 99CRS72613, 99CRS72614, 99CRS72615, 99CRS72616, 99CRS72617, 99CRS72618, 99CRS72619)

Case without published opinion. No error.
**EXHIBIT32.4**

# **CERTIFICATIONBY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Visant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul B. Carousso, principalfinancial officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 9, 2006 |         | /s/ Paul B.  Carousso         |
|------------------------|--------------|-------------------------------|
|                   |         | Paul B. Carousso              |
|                   | *** *** | *Vice  President, Finance*    |
|                   | *** *** | *(Chief  Accounting Officer)* |

 

----