alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
iShares®
COMEX® Gold Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael A. Latham, Chief Executive Officer of BlackRock Asset Management International Inc., the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Date:
May 7, 2010



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Michael A. Latham                                                 
|Michael A. Latham *
Chief Executive Officer (Principal
executive officer)





|* | The Registrant is a trust and Mr. Latham is signing in his capacity as an officer of BlackRock Asset Management International Inc., the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN RE A.A.

No. COA05-383.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Lenoir (04J100, 04J101, 04J102).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# C_2013373EN.01001801.xml

| 20.12.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 373/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 373/18

---

Declaration of the Commission on Article 5(7) of the Specific Programme

2013/C 373/04

‘The Commission strongly regrets the inclusion of paragraph 7 in Article 5 introducing the examination procedure referred to in Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 for the granting of Union financial assistance to the projects or parts of projects selected following every call for proposals on the basis of the work programmes referred to in article 5 of the Specific Programme Implementing Horizon 2020. The Commission recalls that it did not propose this procedure in any of the sectoral MFF acts. This was intended to simplify the MFF programmes to the benefit of the recipients of EU funding. The approval of grant decisions without committee scrutiny would accelerate the procedure reducing the time-to-grant to the advantage of beneficiaries and avoiding unnecessary red tape and costs. Moreover, the Commission recalls that the taking of grant decisions is part of its institutional prerogative relating to the execution of the budget and therefore should not be adopted through comitology.

The Commission also considers that this inclusion cannot serve as a precedent for other funding instruments.’

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of B&G Foods, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 2, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
L. Wenner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ David L. Wenner
-----------------------
David L. Wenner
Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2004
THE HATCH ACT

Permitted and Prohibited Activities for Most Federal Employees

Generally, federal employees, unless further restricted*, may actively participate in political management and

political campaigns. Accordingly, these employees may engage in “political activity” on behalf of a political 

party or partisan political group (collectively referred to as “partisan groups”) or candidate in a partisan

election as long as it is not on duty or in the workplace. Political activity refers to any activity directed at the

success or failure of a partisan group or candidate in a partisan election. 

For more information, contact the U.S. Office of Special Counsel at (202) 804-7002 or hatchact@osc.gov. 

• May be candidates in non-partisan elections.

• May register and vote as they choose.

• May assist in voter registration drives.

• May contribute money to partisan groups and

candidates in partisan elections.

• May attend political fundraisers.

• May attend and be active at political rallies and

meetings.

• May join, be active, and hold office in partisan

groups.

• May sign and circulate nominating petitions.

• May campaign for or against candidates in partisan

elections.

• May make campaign speeches for candidates in

partisan elections.

• May distribute campaign literature in partisan

elections.

• May campaign for or against referendum questions,

constitutional amendments, or municipal

ordinances.

• May express opinions about political issues.

• May express opinions about partisan groups and

candidates in partisan elections while not at work

or using official authority.

*All career SES employees, ALJs, and employees

identified at 5 U.S.C. § 7323(b)(2)(B)-(3) are further

restricted.

• May not be candidates in partisan elections.

• May not use official authority to interfere with an

election or while engaged in political activity.

• May not invite subordinate employees to political

events or otherwise suggest that they engage in

political activity.

• May not knowingly solicit or discourage the

political activity of any person with business before

the agency.

• May not solicit, accept, or receive political

contributions (including hosting or inviting others

to political fundraisers) unless both persons are

members of the same federal labor or employee

organization, the person solicited is not a

subordinate employee, the solicitation is for a

contribution to the organization’s political action

committee, and the solicitation does not occur

while on duty or in the workplace.

• May not engage in political activity while on duty,

in the workplace, wearing a uniform or official

insignia, or in a government vehicle. For example:

o May not wear, display, or distribute partisan

materials or items.

o May not perform campaign-related chores.

o May not make political contributions.

o May not use email or social media to engage in

political activity.

Rev. Sept. 2017
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SEC.1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of CUNO, Incorporated (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Mark G. Kachur, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company. /s/ MARK G. KACHURMark G. KachurChairman, Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
 Date: December 22, 2004
STATE v. RUSH.

No. COA06-41.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 20, 2006.

Certification Date July 10, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS63710).

Case reported without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
STATE v. Montrez Demario CARTER.

No. 290A06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 1, 2006.

George E. Kelly, III, Palmyra, VA, for Montrez Demario Carter.

Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of June 2006 by the Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of June 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth William BATES.

No. 456P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Anita LeVeaux, Assistant Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Rudolph A. Ashton, III, Kirby H. Smith, III, New Bern, for Kenneth William Bates.

Prior report: 172 N.C.App. 27, 616 S.E.2d 280.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 22nd day of August 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."

"The state's petition for discretionary review is treated as a petition for a writ of certiorari and is allowed for the limited purpose of remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of *State v. Lawrence,*360 N.C. 368, 627 S.E.2d 609 (2006). By order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006."
# L_2015084EN.01007301.xml

| 28.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/73

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision 2013/462/EU of 22 July 2013 on the signature, on behalf of the European Union, and on the provisional application of the Protocol setting out fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Gabonese Republic

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 250 of 20 September 2013
  )

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 250 of 20 September 2013

On page 1, in the signature:

for:

‘For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON’

,

read:

‘For the Council

The President

V. JUKNA’

.

---
PHILLIPS v. CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG HOSP. AUTHORITY.

No. COA05-300.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 20, 2006.

Certification Date July 10, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04CVS 1182).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. FIELDS.

No. COA04-1099.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 5, 2005.

Certification Date July 25, 2005.

Appeal from the Granville (03CRS50597).

Case without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit 4.1**

 

|                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  

  | **PricewaterhouseCoopers      LLP/s.r.l./s.e.n.c.r.l.      Chartered Accountants**      Place de la Cité, Tour Cominar      2640 Laurier Boulevard, Suite 1700      Québec, Quebec      Canada G1V 5C2      Telephone +1 418 522 7001    Facsimile +1 418 522 5663 |

 

 

 

 

 

 

**Consent of Independent Auditors**

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year  ended February 28, 2010 of Virginia Mines Inc. (the "Company") of our report dated May 14, 2010  relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,  which appears in the Exhibit incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F. We also  consent to the reference to us under the heading "Interests of Experts" in the Annual Information Form  incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 40-F.

 

 

**Chartered Accountants**

  Québec, Quebec, CanadaMay 14, 2010

 

“PricewaterhouseCoopers” refers to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP/s.r.l./s.e.n.c.r.l., an Ontario limited liability partnership, or, as the contextrequires, the PricewaterhouseCoopers global network or other member firms of the network, each of which is a separate legal entity.
BALD HEAD ASSO. v. CURNIN.

No. 270P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 19, 2006.

Stuart L. Egerton, for Bald Head Association.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of May 2006 by Defendant for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of May 2006."
Case: 13-14065 Date Filed: 02/24/2015 Page: 1 of 6 
Case: 13-14065 Date Filed: 02/24/2015 Page: 2 of 6 
Case: 13-14065 Date Filed: 02/24/2015 Page: 3 of 6 
Case: 13-14065 Date Filed: 02/24/2015 Page: 4 of 6 
Case: 13-14065 Date Filed: 02/24/2015 Page: 5 of 6 
Case: 13-14065 Date Filed: 02/24/2015 Page: 6 of 6
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ANDRE DEVEAUX,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D23-800

 LT Case No. 2009-CF-008661-A

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Decision filed June 6, 2023 

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Duval County,

Meredith Charbula, Judge.

Andre Deveaux, Jasper, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General 

and Zachary Lawton, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

BOATWRIGHT, KILBANE and MACIVER, JJ., concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jeremiah ROYSTER.

No. 441PA04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Sam Currin, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Defendant's motion for "Petition for Writ of Discretionary Review," which has been treated by this Court as a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, is allowed for the limited purpose of entering the following order:

This case is remanded to the Warren County Superior Court with instructions to: (1) appoint a guardian ad litem, pursuant to G.S. § 1A, Rule 17(b), to represent defendant's interests until such time as the trial court determines he is competent; (2) appoint counsel for defendant; and (3) hold an evidentiary hearing on defendant's pending MAR.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 2nd day of March, 2006.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the
Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, JOHN J. HANNAN, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best
of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.



|                   |  |                 
|------------------ |  | ----------------
|/s/ JOHN J. HANNAN
|Name:              |  | John J. Hannan  
|Date:              |  | November 6, 2006
David K. EVERSON, and Patricia M. Everson v. Douglas E. WRIGHT.

No. 146P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2006.

Patricia M. Everson, Pro Se.

David K. Everson, Pro Se.

Douglas E. Wright, Pro Se.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of March 2006 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following *927order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2006."
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Hong Kong

                    On July 14, 2020, by Executive Order 13936, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq*.) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the situation with respect to Hong Kong.                

The situation with respect to Hong Kong, including recent actions taken by the People's Republic of China to fundamentally undermine Hong Kong's autonomy, continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on July 14, 2020, must continue in effect beyond July 14, 2022. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13936 with respect to the situation in Hong Kong.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2022-15140

Billing code 3395-F2-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Rashawn Drean YARRELL.

No. 448PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 5, 2006.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 616 S.E.2d 258 (2005), finding no error in defendant's trial but remanding for resentencing two judgments entered on 10 December 2002 by Judge Jerry Cash Martin in Superior Court, Randolph County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 April 2006.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Swift Energy Pension Partners 1994-B, Ltd., was in the process of
liquidation as of March 31, 2000 and as such is governed by liquidation basis
accounting.  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Swift Energy Pension Partners 1994-B, Ltd's Statement of Net Assets in Process
of Liquidation and Statement of Changes in Net Assets in Process of Liquidation
contained in its Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statement.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         6,452
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42,159
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               48,611
<PP&E>                                         1,634,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,682,739
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,113
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        24,520
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               24,520
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes  lease  operating  expenses,  production  taxes  and  depreciation,
depletion and  amortization  expense.  Excludes general and  administrative  and
interest expense.
</FN>



</TABLE>
NC BOARD OF PHARMACY v. COMMISSION.

No. 673A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 30, 2006.

Carson Carmichael, III, M. Denise Stanford, Anna Baird Choi, Matthew W. Sawchak, Paul K. Sun, Jr., Julia F. Youngman, Stephen D. Feldman, Raleigh, for NC Board of Pharmacy.

William W. Plyler, Stephen T. Smith, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Solicitor-General, Raleigh, for Rules of Review Commission, et al.

Charlotte A. Mitchell, Stanford D. Baird, William G. Scoggin, Daniel J. Palmieri, Raleigh, Ann M. Anderson, Research Triangle Park, for NC Citizens for Business, et al.

Amy E. Pickle, for NC Coastal Federation, et al.

Robert R. Marcus, Angela L. Little, Greensboro, Dale J. Atkinson, Julia C. Works, Evanston, IL, for NABP.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of May 2006 for Extension of Time to File an Amici Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Amici (American Pharmacists Association and the N.C. Association of Pharmacists) shall have up to and including the 30th day of May 2006 to file and serve their brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of May 2006."
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00253-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF M.M., a Child

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-00921

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE MARION, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the order of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that no costs be assessed against appellant in relation to this appeal 

because she qualifies as indigent under TEX. R. APP. P. 20. 

SIGNED July 2, 2014.

_____________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice