alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Office Lease Agreement Addendum IV



 Exhibit 10.17 
  
 ADDENDUM IV 
 May 2, 2005 
 Extension of Term and payment of Base Rent 
  

			
	 Lessor:
	  	 The Richard Oppenheimer Living Trust, the Maurice Oppenheimer Living Trust
 and the Helene Oppenheimer Living Trust

	 	  	C/o Castle Management
	 	  	12885 Alcosta Blvd. Ste. A
	 	  	San Ramon, CA 94583
	 	  	 
	 Lessee:
	  	Tut Systems, Inc.
	 	  	5200 Franklin Drive Ste. 100
	 	  	Pleasanton, CA 94588
	 	  	 
	 Premises:
	  	5200 Franklin Dr., Suite 100, Pleasanton, CA 94588, Commercial Office Space of approximately 17,100+/- square feet, with parking.

  
 The following terms
are intended to modify those provisions set forth in the Lease Dated 11/20/02, as modified by the Addendum, Addendum II and Addendum III as follows: 
  
 Term: The Lease Term shall be extended an additional twenty four (24) months commencing July 1, 2005 and ending June 30, 2007. 
  
 Base Rent: The Base Rent for months 1 through 12 of the extended term shall be
$15,817.50 per month. The Base Rent for months 13 through 24 of the extended term shall increase to $16,672.50 per month. Base Rent shall be payable by Lessee to Lessor in the same manner as before and shall be subject to all other provisions of the
Lease Agreement including payment of the Lease Agreement previously set forth and contained herein, including but not limited to Common Area Operating Expenses and Real Property Taxes, currently estimated to run $0.51 per square foot per month).
(See paragraphs 4.2 and 10 of the Lease). 
  

			
	 By Lessor:
	 	 /s/ Richard Oppenheimer


	 	 	Richard Oppenheimer
	 	 	Trustee
	 	 	 
	 By Lessee:
	 	 /s/ Salvatore D’Auria


	 	 	Salvatore D’Auria
	 	 	Chairman of the Board
	 	 	Tut Systems, Inc.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5535 

To amend the Peace Corps Act to provide continued funding for the Peace 

Corps, to increase the readjustment allowance for returning Peace Corps 

volunteers, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 5, 2008 

Mr. FARR (for himself, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. HONDA, Mr. WALSH of New York, 

Mr. PETRI, and Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Peace Corps Act to provide continued funding 

for the Peace Corps, to increase the readjustment allowance for returning Peace Corps volunteers, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Peace Corps Reauthor5 ization Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR THE PEACE CORPS. 

7 Section 3(b)(1) of the Peace Corps Act (22 U.S.C. 

8 2502(b)(1)) is amended— 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5535 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’; and 

2 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 

3 following: ‘‘, $400,000,000 for fiscal year 2009, 

4 $500,000,000 for fiscal year 2010, $600,000,000 for 

5 fiscal year 2011, and $700,000,000 for fiscal year 

6 2012’’. 

7 SEC. 3. READJUSTMENT ALLOWANCE FOR PEACE CORPS 

8 VOLUNTEERS. 

9 Section 5(c) of the Peace Corp Act (22 U.S.C. 

10 2504(c)) is amended, in the first sentence, by striking 

11 ‘‘$125’’ and inserting ‘‘$225’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE v. George Earl GOODE, Jr.

No. 10A94-6.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 13, 2006.

Lisa Miles, Mark Montgomery, Durham, Diane M.B. Savage, for George Earl Goode, Jr.

Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of March 2006 by Attorney General for Extension of *667Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 28th day of April 2006 to file and serve his/her response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 13th day of March 2006."
EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                                                                                   |  |                               
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Subsidiaries  Direct/Wholly-owned                                                                 |  | State of Incorporation        
|Appalachian Capital Trust I                                                                        |  | Delaware                      
|                                                                                                   | 
|Appalachian Community BankAlso doing business under the registered trade name Gilmer County Bank |  | Georgia                       
|                                                                                                   | 
|Appalachian Community Bank, FSB                                                                    |  | United States (thrift charter)
|                                                                                                   | 
|Appalachian Real Estate Holdings, Inc.                                                             |  | Georgia                       
|                                                                                                   | 
|Subsidiaries  Indirect/wholly-owned by Appalachian Community Bank                                 |  |                               
|Appalachian Information Management, Inc.                                                           |  | Georgia
70 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

MONTANA 

#46 #39 0.1% $655 #46 #48 #45

$0.7 B SPENT IN 1.3% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $0.3 B CONTRACT 9,190 NUMBER OF $0.4 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 3% Research and

Supplies and Development: 4%

Equipment: 23%

Service: 70%

By Service 

Army

10%

Navy/Marines

5%

Air Force

Other Defense

11%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 10%

National 

Guard: 36%

Civilian: 16%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

40%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

57%

Other Defense

0%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

S&K Technologies $124.7 M

James Talcott Construction Inc. $17.3 M

T&L Sales $15.4 M

Geranios Enterprises Inc. $9.6 M

Sonju Industrial Coatings Inc. $9.3 M

Hydrogeologic $8.6 M

United Materials of Great Falls $8.6 M

S2 Corp. $6.3 M

Integrated Security Solutions $6.1 M

Montana State University $6.0 M

73%

Active Duty: 38%

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.3 $0.3

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2

$0.1

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16

$0.1

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

$394.9 MILLION 9,190

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Total

5,266

ND

643

393

ND

178

ND

88

77

77

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Reserve

Cascade 3,409 865 940 52

Lewis and Clark ND 378 938 331

Yellowstone 37 25 318 263

Missoula 30 23 180 160

Gallatin 11 15 288 ND

Silver Bow 12 23 76 67

Flathead 0 ND 140 14

Lincoln 0 51 37 0

Park 0 0 77 0

Valley 0 43 34 0
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020 71

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MONTANA 

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Lake

Cascade

Gallatin

Flathead

Missoula

Deer Lodge

Lewis and Clark

Fergus

Silver Bow

Valley

(M = millions)

$132.2 M

$112.7 M

$19.2 M

$17.7 M

$6.6 M 

$5.0 M

$3.9 M

$3.3 M 

$3.1 M

$2.0 M

Cascade

Lewis and Clark

Yellowstone

Gallatin

Missoula

Silver Bow

Lincoln

Valley

Flathead

Park

$259.8 M

$71.9 M

$14.9 M

$11.1 M

$9.3 M

$6.3 M 

$5.1 M

$4.5 M

$4.0 M

$1.1 M

Flathead

Lake

Lewis and Clark

Cascade

Valley

Fergus

Missoula

Deer Lodge

Gallatin

Silver Bow

Flathead

Lewis and Clark

Cascade

Valley

Missoula

Gallatin

Yellowstone

Park Silver Bow

Lincoln
Exhibit 32.1.  Section 1350 Certification by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Imperial Petroleum Recovery Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periods ended October 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007, and 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan Springer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Alan Springer


Alan Springer


Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


October 20, 2011
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000637 07-OCT-2019 09:09 AM
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Gregg A. Ostrander, as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Michael Foods, Inc. (the Company)
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1) the accompanying Form 10-Q report for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 3, 2004



By:

/s/ Gregg A. OstranderGregg A. Ostrander Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Todd M. Raba,  Senior Vice  President  of  MidAmerican  Energy  Company  (the
"Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company  for the  quarterly
     period  ended  March  31,  2003  (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of the
     Company.


Dated:   May 12, 2003




                                /s/ Todd M. Raba
                                ----------------------------
                                Todd M. Raba
                                Senior Vice President
                                (co-chief executive officer)


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to  MidAmerican  Energy  Company  and will be  retained by  MidAmerican
Energy Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Richard Marlo MELVIN.

No. 214P06.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 29, 2006.

Matthew Wunsche, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Richard Marlo Melvin.

Tiare B. Smiley, Special Deputy Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of April 2006 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*894"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 29th day of June 2006.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2866431-MAY-201208:28 AM
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America, Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew
      A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
                    *Matthew A. Jones*Matthew
                    A. JonesChief
                    Financial OfficerNovember
                    8, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1995, AND FOR THE
THREE YEARS IN THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         209,387
<SECURITIES>                                     4,640
<RECEIVABLES>                                  126,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,534
<INVENTORY>                                    151,406
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               546,719
<PP&E>                                          89,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 908,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           986
<OTHER-SE>                                     669,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   908,377
<SALES>                                        697,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               697,273
<CGS>                                          208,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  208,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,973
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,811
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                185,022
<INCOME-TAX>                                    78,689
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            106,748
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   106,748
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.17
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11

<TABLE>

                              COGNIZANT CORPORATION

                COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
                            ON A FULLY DILUTED BASIS
                            YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,

<CAPTION>

AMOUNTS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA                     1996           1995        1994
                                                                ----           ----        ----
<S>                                                           <C>          <C>          <C>
Weighted average number of shares ..........................   169,944      169,522      169,946

Dilutive effect of shares issuable as of
  year-end under stock option  plans .......................     1,301        2,061        1,668

Adjustment of shares applicable to stock options plans .....        57           25           50
                                                              --------     --------     --------
Weighted average number of shares on a fully diluted basis .   171,302      171,608      171,664
                                                              ========     ========     ========
Net income .................................................  $  195.5     $   88.9     $  146.4
                                                              ========     ========     ========
Earnings per share of common stock on a
  fully diluted  basis .....................................  $   1.14(a)  $    .52(a)  $    .85(a)
                                                              ========     ========     ========

</TABLE>



Note: (a) Also reflects Earnings per share on a primary basis.




                                      11-1
STATE v. George Earl GOODE, Jr.

No. 10A94-6.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 27, 2006.

Lisa Miles, Mark Montgomery, Durham, Diane M.B. Savage, for George Earl Goode, Jr.

Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th day of April 2006 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 19th day of May 2006 to file and serve his/her response with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of April 2006."
STATE V.LENSIE.

No. COA04-1094.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Lenoir (02CRS54786)

Case reported without published opinion No error.
114 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

WEST VIRGINIA 

#46

$0.9 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#47

1.0% OF STATE GDP

0.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$496

PER RESIDENT 

#44

$0.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#46

9,728 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#48

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0%

Research and

Development: 3% 

Service: 16%

Supplies and Equipment: 81%

By Service 

Army

47%

Navy/Marines

33%

Air Force

12%

Other Defense

9%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 1%

Reserve: 15%

Civilian: 20%

National Guard: 63%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

71%

Navy/Marines

2%

Air Force

26%

Other Defense

0%

Top Defense Contractors 

Northrop Grumman

Boeing

AERO International

Raytheon Technologies

True North Enterprises LLC

SMR Technologies

NextGen Federal Systems

4D Tech Solutions, Inc. 

Leidos

STS International

(M = millions)

$293.8 M

$57.8 M

$20.7 M

$18.1 M

$14.5 M

$10.6 M

$9.7 M

$6.9 M

$6.0 M

$4.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.6

$0.5 $0.5

$0.4

$0.3 $0.3

FY15 FY16

$0.2 $0.2

FY14 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$379.8 MILLION 9,728

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Kanawha 18 433 1,531

Berkeley ND 245 1,333

Preston 0 60 490 

Cabell 28 550 0 

Putnam ND 109 386

Wood ND 58 320 

Fayette ND 12 413 

Ohio ND 82 117 

Wayne 0 38 168

Harrison 21 43 123 

Reserve

329 

25 

67

ND 

60

82 

ND 

113 

64

69

Total

2,311

ND 

617

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

270 

256
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

WEST VIRGINIA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Ohio

Preston

Wood

Putnam

Wayne Fayette

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Monongalia Morgan

Mineral Berkeley

Jefferson

Nicholas

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Mineral

Harrison

Monongalia

Jefferson

Kanawha

Nicholas

Berkeley

Mason

Morgan

Cabell

(M = millions)

$302.9 M

$77.5 M

$22.3 M

$21.0 M

$11.7 M

$10.6 M

$8.9 M 

$5.4 M

$5.0 M

$3.7 M 

Kanawha

Berkeley

Cabell

Preston

Putnam

Wood

Harrison

Fayette

Ohio

Wayne

$104.2 M

$61.1 M

$48.0 M

$23.3 M

$22.1 M

$16.8 M

$10.6 M

$10.6 M

$10.0 M

$8.8 M 

Harrison Mason

Kanawha

Cabell

Cabell

Berkeley

Harrison

Kanawha

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 11

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

5
IN RE K.M.

No. COA05-1284.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Johnston, (05J17).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing WorldWide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Winzkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

/S/ MICHAEL WINZKOWSKI
-----------------------
Michael Winzkowski
Chief Executive Officer
October 25, 2005