Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40491 

1See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and 

Rescission of Review, in Part; 2019, 87 FR 748 

(January 23, 2022) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Time Limit for 

Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated April 19, 2022. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Post-Preliminary Results 

Analysis Memorandum,’’ dated May 6, 2022 (PostPreliminary Results Analysis Memorandum), at 8. 

4See JA Solar’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated May 

16, 2022. 

5See GOC’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated May 16, 

2022. 

6See The Alliance’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated 

May 16, 2022. 

7See Risen’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief-Resubmitted,’’ 

dated June 2, 2022. 

8See JA Trina’s Letter, ‘‘Letter in Lieu of Case 

Brief,’’ dated May 16, 2022. These seven companies 

are: Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and 

Technology Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina Guoneng 

Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. (formerly 

Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.); 

Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd., Turpin Trina 

Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Hefei) Science 

and Technology Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar Hezhong 

Photoelectric Co., Ltd.; and Changzhou Trina Solar 

Yabang Energy Co. Ltd. 

9See The Alliance’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ 

dated May 25, 2022. 

10See the GOC’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated 

May 25, 2022. 

11See Risen’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated May 

25, 2022. 

12See JA Solar’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Case Brief,’’ 

dated May 25, 2022. 

13See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Public Hearing 

Schedule,’’ dated June 2, 2022; see also Transcript, 

‘‘Public Hearing,’’ dated June 14, 2022. 

14On December 7, 2012, the Order was published. 

See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether 

or Not Assembled into Modules, from the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 77 

FR 73017 (December 7, 2012). On December 17, 

2021, based on a changed circumstances review, the 

Order was amended. See Crystalline Silicon 

Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into 

Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Changed Circumstances Reviews, and 

Revocation of the Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Orders, in Part, 86 FR 71615 (December 21, 

2021) (Order). 

15See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results and Partial 

Recission of the Administrative Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon 

Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into 

Modules, from the People’s Republic of China; 

2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

16See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

Dated: June 29, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Smooth Hyundai Steel’s Costs 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Select Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. 

(Dongkuk) as a Voluntary Respondent 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–14423 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–980] 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules, From the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results and Partial 

Rescission of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers/exporters of 

crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, 

whether or not assembled into modules 

(solar cells), from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) during the period of 

review (POR) January 1, 2019, through 

December 31, 2019. Commerce is also 

rescinding this review with respect to 

fifty-four companies that had no 

reviewable entries during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Copyak, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3642. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 6, 2022, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review.1 On April 

19, 2022, we extended the time limit for 

the final results.2 On May 6, 2022, we 

issued a Post-Preliminary Results 

Analysis Memorandum, and we invited 

comments from interested parties on 

both the Preliminary Results and the 

Post-Preliminary Analysis 

Memorandum.3 We received timely case 

briefs from the following interested 

parties: (1) mandatory respondent JA 

Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. 

(JA Solar); 4 (2) the Government of China 

(GOC); 5 (3) domestic interested party 

the American Alliance for Solar 

Manufacturing (the Alliance); 6 and (4) 

mandatory respondent Risen Energy Co. 

Ltd. (Risen).7 Trina Solar Co, Ltd. and 

seven of its cross-owned companies 

(collectively, Trina) filed a letter in lieu 

of case brief.8 On May 25, 2022, we 

received timely rebuttal briefs from: (1) 

the Alliance,9 (2) the GOC,10 (3) Risen,11

and (4) JA Solar.12 On June 14, 2022, we 

conducted a public hearing.13

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are solar cells from China.14 For a full 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.15

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the interested 

parties’ briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of topics discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is provided in 

Appendix I to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

After evaluating the comments 

received from interested parties and 

record information, we made certain 

changes from the Preliminary Results 

regarding the calculations of Risen and 

JA Solar’s program rates. These changes 

are explained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For 

each subsidy program found to be 

countervailable, Commerce finds that 

there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial 

contribution from a government or 

public entity that gives rise to a benefit 

to the recipient, and that the subsidy is 

specific.16 For a description of the 

methodology underlying all of 

Commerce’s conclusions, including any 

determination that relied upon the use 

of adverse facts available pursuant to 

section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
40492 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

17See, e.g., Lightweight Thermal Paper from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015, 

82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017); and Circular Welded 

Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s 

Republic of China: Rescission of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2017, 84 FR 14650 

(April 11, 2019). 

18See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). 

19See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

20 JA Solar is cross-owned with the following 35 

companies: (1) Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., 

Ltd. (JA Shanghai); (2) JA (Hefei) Renewable Energy 

Co., Ltd. (Hefei Renewable); (3) Hefei JA Solar 

Technology Co., Ltd. (JA Hefei); (4) JA Solar 

Investment China Co., Ltd. (J A Investment); (5) JA 

Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. (JA Solar); (6) 

Jing Hai Yang Semiconductor Material (Donghai) 

Co., Ltd. (Jing Hai Yang); (7) Donghai JingAo Solar 

Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (JA 

Donghai); (8) Solar Silicon Valley Electronic 

Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (Solar Silicon 

Valley); (9) Beijing Jinfeng Investment Co., Ltd. 

(Beijing Jinfeng); (10) JingAo Solar Co., Ltd. (JingAo 

Solar); (11) Ningjin Songgong Electronic Materials 

Co., Ltd. (Songgong Electronic Materials); (12) 

Jinglong Industry and Commerce Group Co., Ltd. 

(Jinglong Group); (13) Ningjin County Jingyuan New 

Energy Investment Co., Ltd. (Ningjin Jingyuan); (14) 

Hebei Jinglong New Materials Technology Group 

Co., Ltd. (Jinglong New Materials); (15) Hebei 

Jinglong Sun Equipment Co. Ltd. (Hebei Jinglong); 

(16) Hebei Jingle Optoelectronic Technology Co., 

Ltd. (Hebei Jingle); (17) Ningjin Jingxing Electronic 

Material Co., Ltd. (Ningjin Jingxing); (18) Ningjin 

Saimei Ganglong Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. 

(Saimei Ganglong); (19) Hebei Ningtong Electronic 

Materials Co., Ltd. (Hebei Ningtong); (20) JA Solar 

(Xingtai) Co., Ltd. (JA Xingtai); (21) Xingtai Jinglong 

Electronic Material Co., Ltd. (Jinglong Electronic 

Materials); (22) Xingtai Jinglong PV Materials Co., 

Ltd. (Jinglong PV Materials); (23) JA PV Technology 

Co., Ltd. (PV Technology); (24) Ningjin Jinglong PV 

Industry Investment Co., Ltd. (Jinglong PV 

Investment); (25) Baotou JA Solar Technology Co., 

Ltd. (JA Baotou); (26) Xingtai Jinglong New Energy 

Co., Ltd. (Jinglong New Energy); (27) Ningjin 

County Jing Tai Fu Technology Co., Ltd. (Jing Tai 

Fu); (28) JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (JA 

Technology); (29) Jinglong Technology Holdings 

Co., Ltd. (Jinglong Technology); (30) Ningjin 

Guiguang Electronics Investment Co., Ltd. (Ningjin 

Guiguang); (31) Ningjin Longxin Investment Co., 

Ltd. (Longxin Investment); (32) Beijing JA Solar PV 

Technology Co., Ltd. (JA Beijing); (33) Solar Silicon 

Peak Electronic Science and Technology Co., Ltd. 

(Solar Silicon Peak); (34) Jingwei Electronic 

Materials Co., Ltd.; and (35) Taicang Juren PV 

Material Co., Ltd. See the Preliminary Results PDM. 

21Risen is cross-owned with the following 13 

companies: (1) Risen Energy Co., Ltd. (Risen); (2) 

Risen (Luoyang) New Energy Co., Ltd.; (3) Risen 

(Wuhai) New Energy Co., Ltd.; (4) Risen Energy 

(Changzhou) Co., Ltd.; (5) Risen Energy (Yiwu) Co., 

Ltd.; (6) Zhejiang Boxin Investment Co., Ltd.; (7) 

Zhejiang Twinsel Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. 

(8) JiuJiang Shengchao Xinye Technology Co., Ltd. 

(including JiuJang Shengshao Xinye Technology 

Co., Ltd. Ruichang Branch); (9) Jiangsu Sveck New 

Material Co., Ltd.; (10) Changzhou Sveck 

Photovoltaic New Material Co., Ltd.; (11) (including 

Changzhou Sveck Photovoltaic New Material Co., 

Ltd. Jintan Danfeng Road Branch); (12) Changzhou 

Sveck New Material Technology Co., Ltd.; Ninghai 

Risen Energy Power Development Co., Ltd., and 

(13) Risen (Ningbo) Electric Power Development 

Co., Ltd. See the Preliminary Results PDM. 

22See Appendix II of this notice for a list of all 

companies that remain under review but were not 

selected for individual examination, and to which 

Commerce has assigned the non-selected 

companies’ rate. 

23See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

It is Commerce’s practice to rescind 

an administrative review of a 

countervailing duty order, pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there are no 

reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR for which 

liquidation is suspended.17 Normally, 

upon completion of an administrative 

review, the suspended entries are 

liquidated at the countervailing duty 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.18 Therefore, for an 

administrative review of a company to 

be conducted, there must be a 

reviewable, suspended entry that 

Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate 

at the calculated countervailing duty 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.19

We continue to find that fifty-four 

companies subject to this review did not 

have reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise for which liquidation is 

suspended. Because there is no 

evidence on the record to indicate that 

these companies had entries, exports, or 

sales of subject merchandise during the 

POR, we are rescinding this review with 

respect to these companies consistent 

with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). See 

Appendix III for a complete list of these 

companies. 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not directly address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 705(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for determining 

the all-others rate in an investigation, 

for guidance when calculating the rate 

for companies which were not selected 

for individual examination in an 

administrative review. Section 

777A(e)(2) of the Act provides that ‘‘the 

individual countervailable subsidy rates 

determined under subparagraph (A) 

shall be used to determine the all-others 

rate under section 705(c)(5) {of the 

Act}.’’ Under section 705(c)(5)(A) of the 

Act, the all-others rate is normally ‘‘an 

amount equal to the weighted average of 

the countervailable subsidy rates 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis countervailable 

subsidy rates, and any rates determined 

entirely {on the basis of facts 

available}.’’ 

For these final results, we calculated 

above de minimis rates for Risen and JA 

Solar. Therefore, for the remaining 

companies under review (i.e., the 

companies for which we did not receive 

a timely request for withdrawal of 

review and which we are not finding to 

be cross-owned with the mandatory 

respondents), we calculated the allothers rate using a simple average of the 

individual subsidy rates calculated for 

the two mandatory respondents to be 

15.75 percent ad valorem. See 

Appendix II for a complete list of these 

companies. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5), Commerce calculated a 

countervailable subsidy rate for the two 

mandatory company respondents, Risen 

and JA Solar. 

We determine that, for the period 

January 1, 2019, through December 31, 

2019, the following net countervailable 

subsidy rates exist: 

Producer/exporter 

Subsidy rate 

(percent ad 

valorem) 

JA Solar Technology Yangzhou 

Co., Ltd. (JA Solar) 20 ........... 18.58 

Risen Energy Co., Ltd.21 .......... 12.92 

Non-Selected Companies 22 ..... 15.75 

Disclosure 

Commerce will disclose to the parties 

in this proceeding the calculations 

performed for these final results within 

five days of the date of publication of 

this notice in the Federal Register.23

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and 

(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.212(b), Commerce shall determine, 

and CBP shall assess, countervailing 

duties on all appropriate entries of 

subject merchandise in accordance with 

the final results of this review. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

For the companies for which this 

review is rescinded, Commerce will 

instruct CBP to assess countervailing 

duties on all appropriate entries at a rate 

equal to the cash deposit of estimated 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40493 

countervailing duties required at the 

time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, during the 

POR in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(l)(i). 

Cash Deposit Instructions 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

and (a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce 

intends to instruct CBP to collect cash 

deposits of estimated countervailing 

duties in the amounts shown for the 

companies listed above on shipments of 

subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review. For all nonreviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to 

continue to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties at the 

all-others rate or the most recent 

company-specific rate applicable to the 

company, as appropriate. These cash 

deposits, when imposed, shall remain in 

effect until further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

these results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: June 29, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Rescission of the Administrative Review, 

in Part 

V. Rate for Non-Selected Companies Under 

Review 

VI. Use of Facts Available and Application of 

Adverse Inferences 

VII. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

VIII. Subsidies Valuation Information 

IX. Analysis of Programs 

X. Discussion of Comments 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to 

the Export Buyer’s Credit Program 

(EBCP) 

Comment 2: Whether the EBCP Should be 

Treated as an Export Program 

Comment 3: Whether Input Producers of 

Solar Grade Polysilicon, Aluminum 

Extrusions, and Solar Glass are 

Authorities 

Comment 4: Whether the Provision of 

Electricity for Less than Adequate 

Remuneration (LTAR) Program is 

Countervailable 

Comment 5: Whether ‘‘Other Subsidies’’ 

are Countervailable 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Find that the Renminbi (RMB) is Not 

Undervalued 

Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should 

Alter the Ocean Freight Benchmark 

Calculations 

Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should 

Alter the Benchmark Calculations for the 

Provision of Solar Glass for LTAR 

Program 

Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should 

Alter the Benchmark Calculations for the 

Provision of Aluminum Extrusions for 

LTAR Program 

Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should 

Change the Inland Freight Values Used 

for the Benefit Calculations of the 

Provision of Solar Glass, Aluminum 

Extrusions, and Solar Grade Polysilicon 

for LTAR Programs 

Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust the Benefit Calculations for the 

Other Subsidy Programs 

Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should 

Exclude Risen’s Other Business Revenue 

from Risen’s Sales Denominators 

Comment 13: Whether Commerce Should 

Tie Benefits from the Provision of 

International Ocean Shipping Services 

for LTAR Program to Specific Markets or 

Products 

Comment 14: Whether the Provision of 

International Ocean Shipping Services 

for LTAR Program is Specific 

Comment 15: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply AFA to Determine that 

Government of China (GOC0 Authorities 

Provided a Financial Contribution for All 

of the Respondents’ Purchases Under the 

of International Ocean Shipping Services 

for LTAR Program 

Comment 16: Whether Commerce Should 

Make Changes to the Calculations of JA 

Solar and Risen’s Sales Denominators 

Comment 17: Whether Commerce Should 

Make Changes to Its Land Benchmark 

Calculations 

Comment 18: Whether Commerce Should 

Treat Benefits from JA Solar’s Leases as 

Recurring and Revise the Benchmark 

Used for the Provision of Land for LTAR 

Program Benefit Calculations for Leases 

Comment 19: Whether Commerce Should 

Determine that JA Solar is Creditworthy 

Comment 20: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise its Determination on the Tax 

Exemptions Under the Article 26(2) of 

the Enterprise Income Tax Law Program 

Comment 21: Whether Commerce Should 

Remove VAT from the Solar Glass 

Benchmark Used to Calculate the Benefit 

from the Provision of Solar Glass for 

LTAR to JA Shanghai 

Comment 22: Whether Commerce Should 

Correct Certain Errors in JA Solar’s 

Calculations 

Comment 23: Whether Commerce Should 

Correct Certain Errors in Risen’s 

Calculations 

XI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

1. Canadian Solar International Limited 

2. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) 

Inc. 

3. Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang) 

Inc. 

4. Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd. 

5. CSI Cells Co., Ltd. 

6. CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing (Yancheng) 

Co., Ltd. 

7. Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co., 

Ltd. 

8. Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. 

9. Jinko Solar Import and Export Co., Ltd. 

10. LONGi Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 

11. Suntech Power Co., Ltd. 

12. Yingli Energy (China) Co., Ltd. 

Appendix III 

Intent To Rescind Review, In Part 

1. Astronergy Co., Ltd. 

2. Astronergy Solar 

3. Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology 

Co., Ltd. 

4. Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy 

Resources Co., Ltd. 

5. Boviet Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 

6. BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd. 

7. Chint New Energy Technology (Haining) 

Co., Ltd. 

8. Chint Solar (Hong Kong) Company Limited 

9. Chint Solar (Jiuquan) Co., Ltd. 

10. CSI Modules (Dafeng) Co., Ltd. 

11. DelSolar (Wujiang) Ltd. 

12. DelSolar Co., Ltd. 

13. De-Tech Trading Limited HK 

14. Dongguan Sunworth Solar Energy Co., 

Ltd. 

15. Eoplly New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. 

16. ERA Solar Co., Ltd. 

17. ET Solar Energy Limited 

18. Fuzhou Sunmodo New Energy 

Equipment Co., Ltd. 

19. GCL System Integration Technology Co. 

Ltd 

20. Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., 

Ltd. 

21. Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

22. Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources 

Co., Ltd. 

23. Jiangsu High Hope Int’l Group 

24. Jinko Solar International Limited 

25. JinkoSolar Technology (Haining) Co., Ltd. 

26. LERRI Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 

27. LightWay Green New Energy Co., Ltd. 

28. Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., 

Ltd. 

29. Longi (HK) Trading Ltd. 

30. Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd. 

31. ReneSola Jiangsu Ltd. 

32. Renesola Zhejiang Ltd. 

33. Shenzhen Yingli New Energy Resources 

Co., Ltd. 

34. Sumec Hardware & Tools Co., Ltd. 

35. Sunpreme Solar Technology (Jiaxing) Co., 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
40494 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

24 During the administrative review, this 

company was imprecisely referred to as Trina Solar 

Energy Co. Ltd. See Trina Solar’s Letter, ‘‘Letter in 

Lieu of Case Brief,’’ dated May 16, 2022. 

1See Glycine from India and the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Orders, 84 

FR 29173 (June 21, 2019) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

41821 (August 3, 2021) (Initiation Notice). 

3 In the CVD investigation, the Petition was 

submitted on behalf of GEO Specialty Chemicals, 

Inc. and Chattem Chemicals, Inc. In this review, we 

reference GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc., a domestic 

glycine producer, as the petitioner. 

4See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Glycine from India (C– 

533–884): Partial Withdrawal of Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated November 1, 2021 

(Petitioner’s Partial Withdrawal of Review 

Requests). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review of Glycine from India, 2020: 

Extension of Deadline for the Preliminary Results,’’ 

dated February 25, 2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review of Glycine from India, 2020: 

Second Extension of Deadline for the Preliminary 

Results,’’ dated June 6, 2022. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review of Glycine from India, 2020: 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

8The eight companies for which the petitioner 

withdrew its request for review are Paras; Mulji 

Mehta Enterprises; Mulji Mehta Pharma; Studio 

Disrupt; J.R. Corporation; Rudraa International; 

Rexisize Rasayan Industries; and Indiana ChemPort. 

9Paras submitted a request for review with 

respect to itself. See Paras’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

June 28, 2021. Paras did not withdraw its request 

for review. 

10See, e.g., Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road 

Tires from the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2016, 

83 FR 32080 (July 11, 2018). 

Ltd. 

36. Suntimes Technology Co., Limited 

37. Systemes Versilis, Inc. 

38. Taimax Technologies Inc. 

39. Talesun Energy 

40. Talesun Solar 

41. tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

42. Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., 

Ltd. 

43. Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources 

Co., Ltd. 

44. Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd. 

45. Yingli Green Energy International 

Trading Company Limited 

46. Zhejiang ERA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. 

47. Zhejiang Jinko Solar Co., Ltd. 

48. Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science 

& Technology Limited Liability 

Company 

49. Trina Solar Co., Ltd. (formerly Changzhou 

Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.) 24

50. Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy 

Co., Ltd. 

51. Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

52. Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. 

53. Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. 

54. Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology 

Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14420 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–884] 

Glycine From India: Preliminary 

Results and Rescission, in Part, of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

glycine from India for the period of 

review (POR) January 1, 2020, through 

December 31, 2020. Commerce 

preliminarily determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

glycine from India. In addition, we are 

also rescinding this review with regard 

to seven companies for which the 

request for review was timely 

withdrawn by interested parties. The 

preliminary net subsidy rates are listed 

below in the section titled ‘‘Preliminary 

Results of Administrative Review.’’ 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

George McMahon or Scarlet Jaldin AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1167 or (202) 482–4275, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 21, 2019, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

CVD order on glycine from India.1 On 

August 3, 2021, Commerce published a 

notice of initiation of administrative 

review of the Order.2 On November 1, 

2021, GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. 

(the petitioner),3 timely withdrew its 

request for an administrative review of 

eight companies.4 On February 25, 

2022, Commerce extended the deadline 

for issuing the preliminary results of 

this review until June 22, 2022.5 On 

June 6, 2022, Commerce extended the 

deadline for issuing the preliminary 

results of review until June 30, 2022.6

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.7 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as Appendix 

I to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Rescission, in Part, of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the parties that requested a 

review withdraw the request within 90 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the requested 

review. The petitioner timely submitted 

a withdrawal of its request to review 

eight companies 8 and no other 

interested party requested an 

administrative review of the following 

seven of the eight companies listed in 

the Petitioner’s Partial Withdrawal of 

Review Requests: Mulji Mehta 

Enterprises; Mulji Mehta Pharma; 

Studio Disrupt; J.R. Corporation; Rudraa 

International; Rexisize Rasayan 

Industries; and Indiana Chem-Port. 

Paras Intermediates Private Ltd. (Paras) 

requested a review of its own entries 9

and did not withdraw its request for a 

review. As a result, the review of Paras, 

for which the petitioner and Paras 

requested a review, will not be 

rescinded. In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), and consistent with our 

practice,10 we are rescinding the 

administrative review of the Order, in 

part, with respect to these seven 

companies, and continuing the 

administrative review with respect to 

Avid Organics Private Limited (Avid), 

Kumar Industries (Kumar), and Paras. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is glycine from India. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, we 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES