alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
60 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Raytheon Technologies $3.6 B

Moderna, Inc. $1.8 B

General Electric $1.3 B

Massachusetts Institute of Technology $1.1 B

General Dynamics $780.7 M

Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC $711.9 M

MITRE $403.8 M

Charles Stark Draper Laboratory $376.6 M

Oasis Systems $281.8 M

Lockheed Martin $195.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

MASSACHUSETTS

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

22,076

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Middlesex 1,157 4,630 2,125 1,913 9,825

Hampden 148 982 1,459 2,635 5,224

Barnstable 51 389 1,853 0 2,293

Suffolk 357 287 123 183 950

Worcester 39 81 620 116 856

Bristol 15 53 433 292 793

Plymouth 16 38 350 294 698

Norfolk 18 27 363 202 610

Essex 27 122 360 28 537

Berkshire 13 73 33 0 119

Construction: 3% Research and

Development: 18%

Service: 21%

Supplies and

Equipment: 58%

Active Duty: 9%

Civilian: 30%

National Guard: 35%

Reserve: 26%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

28%

29%

25%

18%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

50%

8%

38%

4%

$3.7

$7.8

$9.7

$12.1 $12.1 $13.3

$18.8

$13.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#9 #19 2.7% $2,184 #9 #6 #33 #32

$15.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.2% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$13.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

22,076 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$463.9 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 61

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

MASSACHUSETTS FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Middlesex

Essex

Bristol

Berkshire

Norfolk

Suffolk

Plymouth

Worcester

Hampshire

Barnstable

(M = millions)

$7.8 B

$3.2 B

$752.2 M

$435.9 M

$427.5 M

$346.7 M

$259.6 M

$135.5 M

$88.5 M

$70.2 M

Middlesex

Hampden

Barnstable

Suffolk

Norfolk

Worcester

Essex

Bristol

Plymouth

Berkshire

$705.4 M

$191.7 M

$97.1 M

$70.0 M

$26.2 M

$25.7 M

$25.2 M

$22.1 M

$18.0 M

$8.7 M

Berkshire Hampshire Worcester

Essex

Middlesex

Suffolk

Norfolk

Bristol Plymouth

Barnstable

Berkshire

Worcester

Hampden

Middlesex

Suffolk

Essex

Norfolk

Bristol Plymouth

Barnstable
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of New York Regional Rail
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joel Marcus, (Acting) Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Joel Marcus
   ----------------
    Joel Marcus
    Chief Financial Officer
    April 19, 2004
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Adrian
Adams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Adrian AdamsAdrian Adams
President and
Chief Executive Officer
March 15, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Kos
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) of APOLLO
INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RICHARD L. PETEKA, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|      |  |                         
|----- |  | ------------------------
|      | 
|      |  | /s/    RICHARD L. PETEKA
|Name: |  | Richard L. Peteka       
|Date: |  | February 8, 2010
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50297 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. LORENZO VILLALOBOS Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-755-10 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Lorenzo Villalobos has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Villalobos has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time ofVillalobos’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 25, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50297

2 Villalobos’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Keith KEGLEY, and Kimber Kegley, Cecil Hammonds, and Maggie Hammonds, and Chadwick J. McKeon v. THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, a North Carolina Municipality.

No. 342P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Robert E. Hornick, Jr., for Keith Kegley, et al.

Karen M. McDonald, City Attorney, Anthony Fox, Charlotte, for City of Fayetteville.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 15th day of July 2005 by Respondent in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."

*508Justice BRADY recused.
20 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Watterson Construction Co. $172.5 M

Arctic Slope Regional Corp. $159.4 M

Chugach Alaska Corp. $93.2 M

Doyon Utilities (DUL) $92.2 M

Haskell Corporation/Davis Constructors JV $46.0 M

Alaska Structures Inc. $36.8 M

Afognak Native Corp. $36.6 M

Crowley $36.6 M

Indyne $35.1 M

ARCTEC Alaska JV $31.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

ALASKA

#32 #5 0.7% $4,730 #36 #27 #25

$3.5 B SPENT

IN STATE

6.4% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $1.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

27,446 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.7 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

27,446

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Anchorage 9,603 3,140 2,435 706 15,884

Fairbanks North Star 7,940 1,615 712 94 10,361

Southeast Fairbanks ND 303 198 ND ND

Matanuska-Susitna ND ND 248 ND ND

Denali 32 33 94 ND ND

Kodiak Island 16 14 ND ND ND

Juneau ND 12 17 ND ND

Bethel ND ND 26 ND ND

Kenai Peninsula ND ND 13 ND

Nome ND ND ND ND ND

Construction: 28%

Research and 

Development: 0%

Service: 54%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 18%

Active Duty: 65%

Civilian: 19%

National Guard: 14%

Reserve: 3%

46%

7%

30%

17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

54%

1%

44%

1%

$1.7

$2.0

$1.3 $1.5 $1.3 $1.2

$1.5

$1.8

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 21

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

North Slope

Fairbanks North Star

Matanuska-Susitna

Ketchikan Gateway

Aleutians West

Yukon-Koyukuk

Denali Southeast Fairbanks

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALASKA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Anchorage

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Denali

Aleutians West

Yukon-Koyukuk

Matanuska-Susitna

Kenai Peninsula

North Slope

Ketchikan Gateway

(K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

$818.1 M

$664.1 M

$114.0 M

$110.0 M

$32.6 M

$16.1 M

$9.3 M

$9.1 M

$8.8 M

$8.1 M

Nome

Bethel

Kenai Peninsula Juneau

Kodiak Island

Anchorage

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Denali

Matanuska-Susitna

Kodiak Island

Juneau

Kenai Peninsula

Bethel

Nome

$1.0 B

$594.0 M

$41.2 M

$14.1 M

$4.2 M

$2.8 M

$1.3 M

$481.6 K

$428.6 K

$190.6 K

Anchorage

Southeast Fairbanks

Anchorage

Kenai Peninsula

Matanuska-Susitna

Denali

Fairbanks North Star
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5663 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an increase in the 

rates of basic educational assistance payable under the laws administered 

by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 31, 2008 

Mr. RODRIGUEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for an 

increase in the rates of basic educational assistance payable under the laws administered by the Secretary of 

Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN AMOUNT OF BASIC EDUCATIONAL 

4 ASSISTANCE. 

5 Section 3015 of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a)(1)— 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5663 IH

1 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘Jan2 uary 1, 2002, $800’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 

3 2009, $1,500’’; 

4 (B) by striking subparagraphs (B) and 

5 (C); and 

6 (C) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as 

7 subparagraph (B); and 

8 (2) in subsection (b)(1)— 

9 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘Jan10 uary 1, 2002, $650’’ and inserting ‘‘January 1, 

11 2009, $1,250’’; 

12 (B) by striking subparagraphs (B) and 

13 (C); and 

14 (C) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as 

15 subparagraph (B). 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION

I, William M. Greenman,
certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Cerus Corporation; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 31, 2017



|                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    WILLIAM M.
GREENMAN                                               
|William M. Greenman
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
MYERS v. MYERS.

No. COA05-274.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 2, 2006.

Certification Date May 22, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (02CVD156).

Case without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #17520 and #17521; MINNESOTA Disaster Number MN-00097]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of MINNESOTA (FEMA-4658-DR), dated 07/08/2022. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Tornadoes, and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         05/08/2022 through 05/13/2022.
 DATES: Issued on 07/08/2022. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         09/06/2022. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/10/2023.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 07/08/2022, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                    Aitkin, Big Stone, Cass, Chippewa, Cottonwood, 
                    ( print page 42535)
                    Douglas, Grant, Kandiyohi, Lac Qui Parle, Lincoln, Morrison, Nobles, Pope, Redwood, Renville, Stearns, Stevens, Swift, Todd, Traverse, Wadena, Wilkin, Yellow Medicine. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.875
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 17520 B and for economic injury is 17521 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Joshua Barnes, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2022-15110 Filed 7-14-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, August 9, 2022.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, August 9, 2022, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Fred Smith. For more information, please contact Fred Smith at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3087, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

Dated: July 5, 2022.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2022-14642 Filed 7-8-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JOHN CHAPMAN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-987

[November 7, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

2015CF004298AMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Stacey Kime, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Deborah Koenig, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
STATE v. MOORE

No. COA05-419

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Onslow (03CRS55735).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
[Cite as State v. Brown , 2017-Ohio-64.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO

TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

State of Ohio, :
Plaintiff-Appellee, :

v. : No. 16AP-634 (C.P.C. No. 09CR-5367) Victor L. Brown, : (ACCELERATED CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. :

D E C I S I O N
Rendered on January 10, 2017

On brief: Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, and Steven L. Taylor, for appellee.

On brief: Victor L. Brown

, pro se.

APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas

TYACK, P.J

. {¶ 1} Victor L. Brown is appealing from the trial court's refusal to order that the court costs be refunded which he paid in a criminal case in which he was the defendant. The State of Ohio has filed a brief in which it states that the costs should, in fact, be
refunded to Brown. {¶ 2} We, therefore, sustain Brown's sole assignment of error which reads:
The trial court has refused to follow the mandate of the Tenth District Court of Appeals when it directed the court to proceed in accordance of law that dismissed defendant's conviction and sentence but did not dismiss the fines associated with the conviction in contravention to law.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and enter judgment compelling the refunding of the court costs in the amount of $138.57 collected in Brown'sNo. 16AP-634 2

case in which his conviction was vacated and in which his case was subsequently
dismissed. Judgment reversed; Judgment entered for appellant.

BROWN and HORTON, JJ., concur.
Concentra Inc. Board of Directors Compensation Plan



 

 
 Exhibit 10.20 
  
 Board of Directors Compensation Plan 
 Adopted September 24, 2002; Modified June 26, 2003; Further Modified July 21, 2005 
  
 Cash Compensation – All Non-Employee Directors*: 
  
 $25,000 annual retainer, payable in equal quarterly installments. 
  
 $2,000 meeting fee for each regular or special Board of Directors meeting attended. 
  
 Cash Compensation – Non-Employee Directors Serving on Standing Committees: 
  
 $15,000 annual fee to the chairperson of the Audit and Compliance Committee, payable in equal quarterly installments. 
  
 $1,000 committee meeting fee for each regular or special standing Board committee meeting
attended as a committee member, not held in conjunction with a regular or special Board of Directors meeting. 
  
 $1,000 additional committee meeting fee to the chairperson of each standing Board committee for each regular or special standing Board committee meeting attended as chairperson, whether or not held in conjunction with
a Board meeting. 
  
 Stock Options – All Non-Employee Directors:

  
 Each Non-Employee Director will receive awards of non-qualified stock options
under the Plan as follows: 
  
 Initial. 10,000 shares on
the first business day following date of first election to the Board of Directors; and 
  
 Annual. 4,000 shares on the next business day following each annual meeting of stockholders (other than the annual meeting of stockholders at which the director is initially elected as a director). 

 
 Each such Non-Employee Director stock option will have an exercise price no less than 100%
of fair market value on date of award and will expire on the earlier of 10 years from date of award or one (1) year after the holder ceases to serve on the Board of Directors. Initial awards will be immediately vested and exercisable. Annual awards
will vest and be exercisable 25% each year for four years on the anniversary date of award. 
  
 Other – All Directors: Reimbursement of travel expenses incurred for meeting attendance. 
  


	*	As such term is defined in the Corporation’s 1999 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Purchase Plan.