alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10(C)



 






EXHIBIT 10(c)




2004-1 AMENDMENT TO THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY REVISED

KEY MANAGEMENT DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN




     This 2004-1 Amendment to The Sherwin-Williams Company Revised Key Management Deferred
Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) is made effective as of December 31, 2004.



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, The Sherwin-Williams Company (the “Company”) established the Plan effective July 24,
2002;



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 10 of the Plan, the Company retains the right to amend the Plan
at any time in whole or in part; and



     WHEREAS, the Company wishes to amend the Plan to freeze all further participation and
contributions to the Plan;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective December 31, 2004 to add the following
Addendum 2004-1:



ADDENDUM 2004-1




     Pursuant to Article 10 of the Plan, notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan to
the contrary, for all periods on and after December 31, 2004: (1) the obligation of the Company to
make any future contributions shall cease; (2) no further deferrals, whether contributed by the
Company or Participants, shall be permitted; and (3) no persons who were not Participants on
December 31, 2004 shall be eligible to become Participants. In addition, no “material
modification”, as such term is defined in The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 or any regulations
or authority issued thereunder (the “Act”), shall be made to the Plan.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to the action of its Board of Directors at a meeting held the
20th day of July, 2005, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed effective
December 31, 2004 by its duly authorized officer.



	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST/WITNESS:	 	THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	By:
	 	/s/
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Louis E. Stellato
	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 131 (Monday, July 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: August 4, 2022.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G31, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Cynthia L. De La Fuente, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G31, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-2740, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#94f0f1f8f5f2e1f1fae0f1f7f8d4fafdf5fdf0bafafdfcbaf3fbe2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3c7c6cfc2c5d6c6cdd7c6c0cfe3cdcac2cac78dcdcacb8dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: July 5, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-14651 Filed 7-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5257 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5257

          To suspend temporarily the duty on disperse red 73.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on disperse red 73.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE RED 73.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.57 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to disperse red 73) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
TEER v. TEER.

No. COA05-399.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (02CVD2258).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed in Part, Reversed and Remanded in Part.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 96-3122SD

_____________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District of

v. * South Dakota.

*

Mike Vallee, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

_____________

 Submitted: June 6, 1997

Filed: June 24, 1997

_____________

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Mike Vallee appeals the district court's denial of Vallee's request to withdraw

his guilty plea to sexual abuse of a minor. We review the district court's ruling for

abuse of discretion. See United States v. Nichols, 986 F.2d 1199, 1201 (8th Cir.

1993). Having considered the record before us, we conclude Vallee failed to establish

a fair and just reason for the withdrawal of his plea. Id. We decline to consider

Vallee's ineffective assistance of counsel claims. These claims are best pursued on

motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v. Jennings, 12 F.3d 836, 840 (8th

Cir. 1994). We thus affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. GEORGE DRUCK, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 459 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 30th day of December, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
STATE of North Carolina v. William T. MASON.

No. 654P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for son.

David N. Kirkman, Assistant Attorney General, William David McFadyen, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 22nd day of November 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of November 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7065

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RAYMOND IDEMUDIA AIGBEKAEN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar , Chief District Judge. ( 1:15

- cr - 00462

- JKB

- 2 )

Submitted : November 9, 2021 Decided: November 12, 2021

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen appeals the district court ’s order denying relief on his Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Aigbekaen , No. 1:15

- cr - 00462

- JKB

- 2 (D. Md. Aug. 11, 2020). We deny as moot the Government’s motion to dissolve abeyance, and we deny Aigbekaen’s motions for mandamus, for fees, to intervene in a prison matter, for acquittal, to reverse the district court’s detention order, to expedite and for immediate release, to dismiss his sex trafficking conviction, for resentencing, and to supplement. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would n ot aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Incorporated Under the Laws of The State of Colorado

	
          Number
  
    ___________
	
      Shares  
     
      ________



PRIDE, INC.
The
Corporation is authorized to issue 200,000,000 Common Shares -- Par Value $.00001
each

       This Certifies
That                         **(NAME)**                      
is the owner of

(letter
amount)------------------------------------------------------------ fully
paid and non-assessable Shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the
books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized
Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.

       In Witness
Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by
its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the Seal of the
Corporation.

Dated________________________



      
__________________________________________             
__________________________________________
                                      
Secretary                                                                            President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRIAN HOOK,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 170 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of July, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3447

_____________________________
D ARRELL M ATTHEW C OLEMAN , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge

. May 31, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , K ELSEY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney Genera l, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT
32.2 CFO CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing Worldwide, Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James Davis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ James DavisJames
      DavisChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      24, 2010
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2011 (the Report) of APOLLO INVESTMENT CORPORATION (the Registrant), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, GENE DONNELLY, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Registrant.



| |  |  |  |                        |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |                       
| |  |  |  | /s/ GENE DONNELLY      |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | Name: Gene Donnelly    |  |  |  | 
| |  |  |  | Date: February 8, 2012 |  |  |  | 



65
'use strict';
(function() {
	// CSR Setup
	var overrideCtx = {};
	overrideCtx.ListTemplateType = 100;
	overrideCtx.Templates = {};
	overrideCtx.Templates.Header = RenderHeader;
	overrideCtx.Templates.Item = RenderItem;
	overrideCtx.Templates.Footer = '';
	overrideCtx.Templates.OnPreRender = OnPreRender;
	overrideCtx.Templates.OnPostRender = OnPostRender;
	SPClientTemplates.TemplateManager.RegisterTemplateOverrides(overrideCtx);

	function GetUrl() {
		var url = _spPageContextInfo.siteAbsoluteUrl;
		return url;
	}

	function RenderHeader(ctx) {
		var header = RenderHeaderTemplate(ctx);
		var div = document.createElement('div');
		div.innerHTML = header;
		return '<div class="osc-videoArea">' + header;
	}

	// Create each item
	function RenderItem(ctx) {
		var id = ctx.CurrentItem.ID;
		var title = ctx.CurrentItem['Title'];
		var feature = ctx.CurrentItem['Feature'];
		var content = ctx.CurrentItem['Content'];

		var baseHtml = '';
		switch (feature) {
			case 'Video Area Title':
				baseHtml = '<h1 class="video-title"> \
								{0} \
							</h1>';
				break;
			case 'Highlighted Video Embed URL':
				// "content" may come through as an acnhor tag (object) instead of sring
				var $item = $(content);
				if ($.type($item) === 'object') {
					content = $item.attr('href');
				}

				// SharePoint strips <iframe> when rendering; add URL as dataset and create iframe after OnPostrender
				baseHtml =
					'<div class="videowrapper"> \
						<span class="video-embed-url" data-embed-url="{0}?rel=0"></span> \
					</div>';
				break;
			case 'Video Button URL':
				baseHtml = '<span class="video-button-wrap"> \
								{0} \
							</span>';
				break;
			case 'Video Button Text':
				baseHtml = '<span class="video-button-text"> \
								{0} \
							</span>';
				break;
		}

		return String.format(baseHtml, content);
	}

	function OnPostRender(ctx) {
		var $areaTitle = $('.video-title');
		var $buttonTitle = $('.video-button-text');
		var $button = $('.video-button-wrap a');

		// SharePoint strips <iframe> when adding to element OnPostRender as html or jQuery Object
		// Wait until DOM ready and insert after initial item is rendered
		$(function() {
			var $span = $('[data-embed-url]');
			var embedUrl = $span.data().embedUrl;
			if (embedUrl) {
				$span.html('<iframe frameborder="0" src="' + embedUrl + '"></iframe>');
			}
		});

		$($button)
			.addClass('video-button')
			.html($buttonTitle)
			.insertAfter('.videowrapper');
		$('.video-button-wrap').remove();
		
	}

	function OnPreRender(ctx) {
		var t = setInterval(function() {
			if (window.jQuery) {
				clearInterval(t);

				var InEditMode =
					document.getElementById('MSOLayout_InDesignMode').value == 1 ? true : false;
				if (!InEditMode) {
					$('.osc-videoArea')
						.parents('.ms-webpart-zone')
						.addClass('osc-videoAreaZone');
					$(
						'.osc-videoArea table[id*="Hero-"], .osc-videoArea table.ms-listviewtable, .osc-videoArea iframe, .osc-videoArea>div:empty'
					).remove();
				}
			}
		}, 1);
		ctx.ListSchema.NoListItem = 'Add items to this list!';
	}
})();
STATE v. HAMMOND.

No. COA05-993.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Columbus (04CRS50247)

Case without published opinion. No error.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,646
<SECURITIES>                                     2,046
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                       373
<INVENTORY>                                     18,309
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,715
<PP&E>                                           8,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,348
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,740
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,050
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,411
<SALES>                                         39,445
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,445
<CGS>                                           17,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,082)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,898
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,980)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,980)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.55)


</TABLE>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus D ismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March

1 , 2012

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00013

- CV

IN RE ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON

- HOUSTON , Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2010

- 40506



### M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On January 6, 2012 , relator Archdiocese of Galveston

- Houston filed a petition for
writ of mandamus in this c ourt. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.
On February 23, 2012, relator filed a motion to dismiss the proceeding because the case has been settled. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is orde red dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Seymore and Boyce.
Exhibit 4.8      CONSENT OF LOUIS GRENIER   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 29, 2012 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Louis Grenier, participated in the preparation of the following technical reports:  - Technical Report and Recommendations, 2011 Exploration Program, Coulon Project, Quebec Mines Virginia Inc., completed in November 2011; and  - Technical Report and Recommendations, Reconnaissance and Trenching Program, Ashuanipi Project, Québec completed in March 2012;  concerning mineralized material in the Coulon and Ashuanipi properties (collectively the Reports) for the Company. Portions of the Reports are summarized, for the Coulon property, under the headings Item III  Description of the Business  3.1.4 Geological Setting; 3.1.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.1.6 Mineralization; and for the Ashuanipi property, under headings 3.6.4 Geological Setting; 3.6.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.6.6 Mineralization in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 29, 2012 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,    /s/  Louis GrenierName:  Louis Grenier, B.Sc., P.Geo.      May 14, 2012
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4815 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4815

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Quinolinic acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2007

 Mr. Hulshof introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Quinolinic acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. QUINOLINIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.17 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2012''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```