alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2013030EN.01001201.xml

| 1.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/12

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 28 January 2013

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

2013/C 30/06

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted to the Council by the Commission in the category of Employers’ representatives,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015.

2

| (2) | A member’s seat is available for Sweden on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Employers' representatives, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat is available for Sweden on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Employers' representatives,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following person is hereby appointed as a member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2015:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS:

| SWEDEN | Ms Karin THAPPER |
| --- | --- |

SWEDEN

Ms Karin THAPPER

Done at Brussels, 28 January 2013.

For the Council

The President

S. COVENEY

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 228, 31.7.2012, p. 3.

2

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5612 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive the deadline on 

the construction of GO Zone property which is eligible for bonus depreciation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2008 

Mr. TAYLOR (for himself, Mr. MELANCON, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. THOMPSON

of Mississippi, and Mr. PICKERING) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to waive 

the deadline on the construction of GO Zone property 

which is eligible for bonus depreciation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF DEADLINE ON CONSTRUCTION OF 

4 GO ZONE PROPERTY ELIGIBLE FOR BONUS 

5 DEPRECIATION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

7 1400N(d)(3) is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(B) without regard to ‘and before Janu9 ary 1, 2009’ in clause (i) thereof,’’. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5612 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

3 December 31, 2007. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
BIDDIX v. EMPLOYMENT SEC. COM'N.

No. COA05-1384.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 20, 2006.

Certification Date July 10, 2006.

Appeal from Burke (05CVS405).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Vice President and Cashier of Communitycorp (the Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this certification:



| | 1. | The annual report of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ W. Roger Crook                   
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | W. Roger Crook                       
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 30, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Gwendolyn P. Bunton              
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Gwendolyn P. Bunton                  
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Vice President and Cashier
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 134 (Thursday, July 14, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 42157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XC173]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (MAFMC) Bluefish 
Advisory Panel (AP) will hold a public meeting, jointly with the 
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) Bluefish Advisory 
Panel.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, August 1, 2022, from 5 p.m. 
to 6:30 p.m. For agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Webinar connection, 
agenda items, and any additional information will be available at 
www.mafmc.org/council-events.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331 or 
on their website at www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of this meeting is for the 
Advisory Panel to comment on bluefish recreational management measures 
for 2023. Feedback will be solicited on the current measures and the 
Monitoring Committee recommendations and AP feedback will be provided 
to inform the Council and Board's specifications discussions.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Shelley Spedden at the Council Office, (302) 526-
5251, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: July 8, 2022.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-14988 Filed 7-13-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
WEAVER-SOBEL v. SOBEL.

No. COA04-474.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (00CVD1702).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: UPCURVE ENERGY

PARTNERS, LLC,

Relator

. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 2 1

- 00 053

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against

the Honorable Mike Swanson, Judge of the 143 rd District Court of Reeves County, Texas, and

concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be condition ally granted. We

therefore conditionally grant Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and direct Respondent to

issue his rulings within thirty days from the date of this opinion

, in accordance with the opinion of

this Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                                           UT
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated  balance sheet of  MidAmerican  Energy Company as of June 30, 1996,
and the  related  consolidated  statements  of income and cash flows for the six
months  ended June 30,  1996,  and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                   PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      2,631,505
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    851,719
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         277,439
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       407,259
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 209,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,377,100
<COMMON>                                       801,439
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            450,191
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 1,242,588
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          50,000
<PREFERRED>                                    78,577
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           1,405,350
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                      0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 164,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  64,461
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                      0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                               0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 1,371,924
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  4,377,100
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      899,062
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           51,396<F1>
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     733,917
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     733,917
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        165,145
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             25,926<F2>
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 191,071
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       54,972
<NET-INCOME>                                   84,703
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                    4,661
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  80,042
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       60,440
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      39,768
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         193,702
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.79
<FN>
<F1>Tag 37 includes operating and nonoperating income taxes and is excluded
from operating expenses in Tag 39 and on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
<F2>Tag 41 includes $6,538,000 of Income from Discontinued Operations, net of
income taxes.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
October 16, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

AUGUSTINO JUAREZ MOSQUEDA, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00737-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### In the Matter of Dawn Andrews, Formerly Known as Dawn Adams, Appellant, v Donald Coryea, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 183]

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Onondaga County (Bryan R. Hedges, J.), entered April 19, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order dismissed the petition seeking to modify a prior order of visitation and directed petitioner to pay respondent’s legal fees arising from the petition to the assigned counsel program.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the second ordering paragraph and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Family Court properly dismissed the petition seeking to modify a prior order by suspending respondent’s visitation with the parties’ two children provided for therein. “Visitation by a noncustodial parent is presumed to be in the ehild[ren]’s best interest and should be denied only in exceptional situations, such as where substantial evidence reveals that visitation would be detrimental to the welfare of the child[ren]” *(Matter of Frierson v Goldston,*9 AD3d 612, 614 [2004]). The record supports the court’s determination that petitioner failed to establish at the hearing on the petition that respondent’s continued visitation with the children posed any risk to them or would be detrimental to their welfare *(see Matter of Gerald D. v Lucille S.,*188 AD2d 650 [1992]). Even assuming, arguendo, that the court erred in precluding petitioner from presenting testimony regarding hearsay statements made by the children concerning petitioner’s allegations that respondent abused the children *(see Matter of Pratt v Wood,*210 AD2d 741, 742 [1994]), we conclude that the error is harmless because the substance of those hearsay statements was otherwise before the court *(see Matter of De Felice v De Felice,*303 AD2d 1017, 1017-1018 [2003]). The court lacked jurisdiction to entertain petitioner’s motion to appoint a new law guardian for the children inasmuch as the motion was made more than two months prior to the commencement of this proceeding *(see Matter of Belmar v City of Syracuse,*100 AD2d 745 [1984]). The court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the 11-year-old child could not give sworn testimony *(see generally Matter of Frederick QQ.,*209 AD2d 832, 833-834 [1994], *lv denied*85 *1351NY2d 802 [1995]). The court erred, however, in sua sponte determining that petitioner is liable for “all legal fees of respondent arising from the . . . petition” and in directing petitioner to pay those fees to the assigned counsel program (see *Matter of Padova v Ross,*123 AD2d 381, 384 [1986]). We therefore modify the order accordingly. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Kehoe, Martoche and Lawton, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Audited Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, 1997 and the
Audited Statement of Income for the twelve months ended December 31, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          27,983
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,983
<PP&E>                                           7,625
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,608
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,608
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,059
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,059)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,059)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,059)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31

   CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christopher Kern, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Castle & Morgan
Holdings, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the registrant, including its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
           report is being prepared;

     b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
           and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
           of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
           evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
           record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
           identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
           internal controls; and

     b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
           controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ Christopher Kern
---------------------
Christopher Kern
Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. Levon Junior JONES.

No. 497A93-8.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2006.

Valerie Spalding, Special Deputy Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of October 2005 by Defendant for Competency Hearing:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2006."
STATE of North Carolina v. Gregory Alton MURPHY.

No. 634P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Gregory Alton Murphy, Pro Se.

Barbara A. Shaw, Assistant Attorney General, Brelinda J. Foster, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th day of November 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
# L_2013032EN.01002001.xml

| 1.2.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 32/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 32/20

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2013/72/CFSP

of 31 January 2013

amending Decision 2011/72/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Tunisia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 31 January 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 31 January 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/72/CFSP (1).

| (2) | The restrictive measures set out in Decision 2011/72/CFSP apply until 31 January 2013. On the basis of a review of that Decision, the restrictive measures should be extended until 31 January 2014. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The restrictive measures set out in Decision 2011/72/CFSP apply until 31 January 2013. On the basis of a review of that Decision, the restrictive measures should be extended until 31 January 2014.

| (3) | Decision 2011/72/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2011/72/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 5 of Decision 2011/72/CFSP is hereby replaced by the following:

‘Article 5

This Decision shall apply until 31 January 2014. It shall be kept under constant review. It may be renewed or amended, as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 31 January 2013.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 28, 2.2.2011, p. 62.

1

---