alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1




                                                                     EXHIBIT 12

                           MCII HOLDINGS (USA) INC.

              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          ---------      ----------      --------      --------      --------
                                                              1993            1994          1995          1996          1997
                                                          ---------      ----------      --------      --------      --------
<S>                                                       <C>            <C>             <C>           <C>           <C>
Income from continuing operations before                           
provision for income taxes                                $  75,524      $   (7,041)     $ 25,460      $ 46,148      $ 59,429
Add:                                                                                                             
  Interest expense, including amortization                    5,878           8,824        12,855        12,857        14,881
  Allocated interest                                          9,160          15,587        22,099         3,172         6,978
  Finance interest                                              775             984         2,658         3,605         2,394
                                                          ---------      ----------      --------      --------      --------
  Earnings, as adjusted                                    $ 91,337      $   18,354      $ 63,072      $ 65,782      $ 83,682
                                                          =========      ==========      ========      ========      ========
Fixed charges:                                                                                                   
  Interest expense, including amortization                    5,878           8,824        12,855        12,857        14,881
  Allocated interest                                          9,160          15,587        22,099         3,172         6,978
  Finance interest                                              775             984         2,658         3,605         2,394
                                                          ---------      ----------      --------      --------      --------
       Fixed charges                                      $  15,813      $   25,395      $ 37,612      $ 19,634      $ 24,253
                                                          =========      ==========      ========      ========      ========
                                                                                  *                              
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                              5.8             0.7           1.7           3.4           3.5
                                                          =========      ==========      ========      ========      ========

</TABLE>               

  * Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges
  Coverage deficiency was $7,041
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5284 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5284

            To extend the suspension of duty on Vinclozolin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

 Mr. Ferguson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To extend the suspension of duty on Vinclozolin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VINCLOZOLIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.19 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3-(3,5-Dichlorophenyl)-5-
ethenyl-5-methyl-2,4-oxazolidineidione) is amended by striking the date 
in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 85-6474.

No. 85-6773.

#### Buxton *v.*Texas. Wisehart *v.*Indiana.

Ct. Crim. App. Tex.; and

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, *Gregg*v. *Georgia,*428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.
HURLEY EXPLORATION INC.


1600 Golf Road Suite 1200


Rolling Meadows, Illinois


USA 60008


 


 


TRUST AGREEMENT


 


 


May 24, 2005


 


 


In accordance with the instructions of the Board of Directors of the Corporation I, Chet Kurzawski, President will hold the Don Claims as described in Appendix A attached to this TRUST AGREEMENT IN Trust for the CORPORATION as President of the CORPORATION. If I resign from position of President than I will immediately transfer the DON Claims to the new President of the CORPORATION.


 


 



	
            .  
 	
            .
 



Chet Kurzawski President


 


Free Miner License Number: ___________________


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 









 


 


 


 


APPENDIX  “A”


 


DON Claim Description


Lillooet Mining Division


N.T.S. Mapsheets 92J/10W, 11E


Centred Approximately


50°36’00” N Latitude


123° 05’ 00” W Longitude


 


The following claims comprise the DON mineral claim group as described in the Trust Agreement dated May 24, 2005:



	
            Name
 	
            Record Number
 	
            Units
 	
            Anniversary Date
 
	
            DON 1
 	
            510119
 	
            245.958
 	
            April 3, 2006
 
	
            DON 2
 	
            510123
 	
            410.038
 	
            April 3, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5408 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5408

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Paraquat dichloride 
             (1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridinium dichloride).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2008

Mr. Bishop of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Paraquat dichloride 
             (1,1'-dimethyl-4,4'-bipyridinium dichloride).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PARAQUAT DICHLORIDE (1,1'-DIMETHYL-4,4'-BIPYRIDINIUM 
              DICHLORIDE).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.06 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended--
            (1) by striking ``4.02%'' and inserting ``Free''; and
            (2) by striking ``12/31/2007'' and inserting ``12/31/
        2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
----

| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of ArQule, Inc.; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Paolo Pucci                    |
|--------|------------------------------------|
|   | Paolo PucciChief Executive Officer |
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5125 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a Medicare 

Advantage benchmark adjustment for certain local areas with VA medical 

centers and for certain contiguous areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2008 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for a Medicare Advantage benchmark adjustment for 

certain local areas with VA medical centers and for certain contiguous areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5125 IH

1 SECTION 1. MEDICARE ADVANTAGE BENCHMARK ADJUST2 MENT FOR CERTAIN LOCAL AREAS WITH VA 

3 MEDICAL CENTERS AND FOR CERTAIN CON4 TIGUOUS AREAS. 

5 Section 1853(k) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1395w–23(k)) is amended— 

7 (1) in paragraph (1), in the matter preceding 

8 subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘paragraphs (2) and (4)’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(4) ADJUSTMENT FOR CERTAIN MA LOCAL

13 AREAS WITH VA MEDICAL CENTERS AND FOR CER14 TAIN CONTIGUOUS AREAS.— 

15 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In applying paragraph 

16 (1) for plan year 2009 and subsequent plan 

17 years, in the case of a targeted MA local area 

18 described in subparagraph (B) that is contig19 uous to one MA local area described in sub20 paragraph (C), if the applicable amounts deter21 mined under such paragraph for such areas for 

22 a year are not equal, the applicable amount de23 termined under such paragraph for each of 

24 such areas for the year shall be deemed to be 

25 the greater of such amounts. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5125 IH

1 ‘‘(B) TARGETED MA LOCAL AREA.—For 

2 purposes of subparagraph (A), a targeted MA 

3 local area is a county— 

4 ‘‘(i) that has within its boundaries a 

5 facility that is an academic medical center 

6 of the Department of Veterans Affairs; 

7 and 

8 ‘‘(ii) for which the payment amount 

9 under this section for each of 2004, 2005, 

10 and 2007 was determined using the 

11 amount specified under subsection 

12 (c)(1)(D) for such area for such year. 

13 ‘‘(C) CONTIGUOUS MA LOCAL AREA.—For 

14 purposes of subparagraph (A), an MA local 

15 area described in this subparagraph is a county 

16 that— 

17 ‘‘(i) does not have within its bound18 aries a facility described in subparagraph 

19 (B)(i); and 

20 ‘‘(ii) meets the criteria described in 

21 subparagraph (B)(ii).’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5201 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5201

    To suspend temporarily the duty on single light optical sensor, 
 stainless steel casing, 0.5 meter-long, 2.2 millimeter diameter cable.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on single light optical sensor, 
 stainless steel casing, 0.5 meter-long, 2.2 millimeter diameter cable.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SINGLE LIGHT OPTICAL SENSOR, STAINLESS STEEL CASING, 0.5 
              METER-LONG, 2.2 MILLIMETER DIAMETER CABLE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Single light        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          optical sensor,                                                    31/2011.......
                          stainless steel
                          casing, 0.5 meter-
                          long, 2.2
                          millimeter
                          diameter cable.
                          MANSKE Part
                          Number 45004
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          9001.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 dated September 26, 1997 (File No. 333-36543), Form S-3
dated January 7, 1998 (File No. 333-42857), and Form S-3 dated March 12, 1998
(File No. 333-42365) of SmarTalk TeleServices, Inc. of our report dated
March 30, 1998 appearing in the Annual Report to Shareholders which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP

Century City, California
March 30, 1998
Kimberly COREMIN and Scott Coremin v. SHERRILL FURNITURE COMPANY, Ralph "Woody" Williams, and Melanie Cooper.

No. 406P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Harvey L. Kennedy, Harold L. Kennedy, III, for Kimberly & Scott Coremin.

Lucretia D. Guia, Winston-Salem, J. Mark Sampson, Greensboro, for Furniture Co., et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th day of August 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
CITY OF WASHINGTON v. MOORE.

No. COA04-1423.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Beaufort (01CVS657).

Case without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
INDIANA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, et al., Appellants, v. Alfred W. GROSS, Deputy Receiver of Reciprocal of America and the Reciprocal Group, et al., Appellees. Virginia Property and Casualty Insurance Guaranty Association, Appellant, v. Alfred W. Gross, Deputy Receiver of Reciprocal of America and The Reciprocal Group, et al., Appellees.

Record Nos. 040497, 041045.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

July 9, 2004.

Upon appeals of right from orders entered by the State Corporation Commission on November 12, 2003, and January 8, 2004.

Upon consideration of the record, briefs, and argument of counsel, the Court is of opinion that the motion to dismiss filed by the Deputy Receiver of Reciprocal of America and The Reciprocal Group, et al., should be granted.

This Court only considers appeals from orders of the State Corporation Commission (the Commission) that are final. *Virginia Citizens Consumer Council v. C & P Tel. Co.,*247 Va. 333, 334, 443 S.E.2d 157, 157 (1994); Va. Const. art. IX, § 4; Code § 12.1-39; Rule 5:21(g). An order is final and appealable when it disposes of the whole subject, gives all the relief that is contemplated, and leaves nothing to be done in the case except to superintend ministerially the execution of the order. *Daniels v. Truck & Equipment Corporation,*205 Va. 579, 585, 139 S.E.2d 31, 35 (1964). Conversely, an order is not final if further action is necessary in order to dispose of the entire subject matter. *Brooks v. Roanoke County Sanitation Authority,*201 Va. 934, 936, 114 S.E.2d 758, 760 (1960); *Mann v. Clowser,*190 Va. 887, 896, 59 S.E.2d 78, 82 (1950).

In the present case, the Commission has referred to a hearing examiner fundamental underlying issues, the resolutions of which are indispensable for the final disposition of the entire subject matter of the case. Indeed, the Commission stated in its January 8, 2004 order that "there remain fundamental issues underlying this matter yet to be determined by the Commission directly, or upon report by a Hearing Examiner." The Commission further stated that "[t]he decision now, therefore, is at most an interim step in the final disposition of the issues presented by the guaranty associations." The Commission also stated that "[t]his matter is continued."

This Court holds, therefore, that neither order appealed from in the present case is final. Accordingly, the appeals are hereby dismissed without prejudice.

Justice LACY took no part in the consideration of these appeals.

This order shall be certified to the State Corporation Commission and shall be published in the Virginia Reports.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         200,557
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,224,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                   146,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,592,131
<PP&E>                                       1,707,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                 618,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,442,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,686,878
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,310,174
<COMMON>                                         1,956
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,663,093
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,442,444
<SALES>                                      9,437,417
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,437,417
<CGS>                                        3,218,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,780,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (3,950)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               165,473
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             177,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                483,374
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            478,474
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   478,474
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
        

</TABLE>
STATE of North Carolina v. Jerry STANFORD.

No. 193P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Paul F. Herzog, Fayetteville, for Jerry Stanford.

Sonya M. Calloway, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 6th day of April 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of April 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Lawrence Clayton, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Commerce Energy Group, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisquarterly report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;     c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.       Date: March 16, 2006 By: /s/ LAWRENCE CLAYTON, JR.             Lawrence Clayton, Jr.      Chief Financial Officer      (Principal Financial Officer)