alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
R. Kenneth BABB, Public Administrator, CTA of the Estate of Reba Burton Newton and R. Kenneth Babb, Public Administrator, CTA of the Estate of Jerry Lewis Newton, Jr. v. Anne Newton GRAHAM, Jerry L. Newton, III, Joseph Wesley Newton, Paul Jeffrey Newton, Jerry L. Newton, III, Trustee under the Will of Reba Burton Newton, Jerry L. Newton, III, Trustee under the inter vivos trust of Reba Burton Newton, Jerry L. Newton, III, Trustee under the Will of Jerry Lewis Newton, Jr. and Gordon W. Jenkins.

No. 382P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Stephen E. Lawing, High Point, for Jerry Lewis Newton, III.

R. Kenneth Babb, Winston-Salem, for R. Kenneth Babb, et al.

Richard V. Bennett, Joshua H. Bennett, Winston-Salem, for Anne Newton Graham.

Wesley Bailey, David W. Bailey, Jr., Lydia A. Hoza, Winston-Salem, for Paul Jeffrey Newton.

G. Gray Wilson, Maria C. Papoulias, Winston-Salem, for Joseph Wesley Newton.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of July 2005 by Defendant (Jerry L. Newton, III) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
<PAGE>
                                                                           
                                                                EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                   APPALACHIAN BANCSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

                COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

           The following tabulation presents the calculation of primary and
fully diluted earnings per common share for the years ended December 31, 1996,
1995 and 1994.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           1996                1995               1994
                                                                      ---------------     ---------------    ------------
<S>                                                                   <C>                 <C>                 <C>

       Reported net income (loss)................................     $     516,736       $   (246,712)      $   (101,431)
                                                                      =============       ============       ============
       Earnings (loss) on common shares..........................     $     516,736       $   (246,712)      $   (101,431)
                                                                      =============       ============       ============
       Weighted average common shares outstanding................           568,000            568,000            568,000
                                                                      =============       ============       ============
       Earnings (loss) per common share - primary and
          fully diluted income from continuing operations........     $         .91       $       (.43)      $       (.18)
                                                                      =============       ============       ============

       Net income (loss).........................................     $         .91       $       (.43)      $       (.18)
                                                                      =============       ============       ============

</TABLE>
Exhibit 5.2  CERTIFICATION  I, Robin Villeneuve, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Virginia Mines Inc. (the issuer);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  May 15, 2014  /S/
Robin VilleneuveRobin Villeneuve
Chief Financial Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5560 

To permit California and other States to effectively control greenhouse gas 

emissions from motor vehicles, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 6, 2008 

Mr. WELCH of Vermont (for himself, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. CARDOZA, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. 

COURTNEY, Mr. CROWLEY, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. 

DELAURO, Mr. DREIER, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FARR, Mr. HALL

of New York, Ms. HARMAN, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. HODES, Mr. HONDA, Mr. 

INSLEE, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. LARSON of 

Connecticut, Ms. LEE, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. MARKEY, 

Ms. MATSUI, Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Mr. MICHAUD, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. MILLER of North Carolina, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. MURPHY of Connecticut, Mr. NADLER, Mr. OLVER, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. 

LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. 

SERRANO, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. SIRES, Ms. SOLIS, Mr. STARK, Mrs. 

TAUSCHER, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. WEXLER, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. WU, and Mr. FILNER) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

A BILL 

To permit California and other States to effectively control 

greenhouse gas emissions from motor vehicles, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5560 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Right to Clean Vehicles 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF PREEMPTION FOR CALIFORNIA GREEN5 HOUSE GAS EMISSION REGULATION FOR VE6 HICLES. 

7 Section 209 of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7543) 

8 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(f) WAIVER.—Notwithstanding subsection (b) or 

10 any other provision of law, the application for a waiver 

11 of preemption dated December 21, 2005, submitted to the 

12 Administrator pursuant to subsection (b) by the State of 

13 California for the regulation of that State to control green14 house gas emissions from motor vehicles shall be consid15 ered to be approved.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Keebler
Foods Company Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 30, 2000 and the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 30, 2000 found
on pages F-3 through F-5 of Keebler's Form 10-K and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001018848
<NAME>                        KEEBLER FOODS COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-2-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-30-2000
<CASH>                                              34,172
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       50,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                         7,339
<INVENTORY>                                        164,811
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   328,819
<PP&E>                                             898,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                     269,365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,772,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              431,483
<BONDS>                                            527,587
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               863
<OTHER-SE>                                         561,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,772,888
<SALES>                                          2,756,950
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,756,950
<CGS>                                            1,119,117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,402,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    25,707
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    21,858
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    284,360
<INCOME-TAX>                                       108,768
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                175,592
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       175,592
<EPS-BASIC>                                           2.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2.00



</TABLE>
GOODSON v. GLATFELTER CO.

No. 464P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 25, 2005.

John N. Fountain, Michael W. Ballance, Raleigh, for P.H. Glatfelter Co.

Neville S. Fuleihan, Rutherfordton, Timothy L. Finger, for James Goodson.

Langdon M. Cooper, Jesse V. Bone, Jr., Jason R. Shoemaker, Gastonia, for Langdon M. Cooper Trustee.

Clementine Peterson, for N.C. Dept. of Insurance.

Catherine Stuart, Charles C. Kyles, Raleigh, for N.C. Self-Ins. Guaranty.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of August 2005 by Defendant (P.H. Glatfelter Co.) for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed pending the determination of the Defendant's petition for discretionary review by order of the Court in conference this the 25th day of August 2005."
# L_2016345EN.01006501.xml

| 20.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 345/65 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 345/65

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2016/2315

of 19 December 2016

amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 31 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/512/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 31 July 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/512/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On 19 March 2015, the European Council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures to the complete implementation of the Minsk agreements, bearing in mind that the complete implementation was foreseen for 31 December 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 19 March 2015, the European Council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures to the complete implementation of the Minsk agreements, bearing in mind that the complete implementation was foreseen for 31 December 2015.

| (3) | On 1 July 2016, the Council renewed Decision 2014/512/CFSP until 31 January 2017 in order to enable it to further assess the implementation of the Minsk agreements. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On 1 July 2016, the Council renewed Decision 2014/512/CFSP until 31 January 2017 in order to enable it to further assess the implementation of the Minsk agreements.

| (4) | Having assessed the implementation of the Minsk agreements, Decision 2014/512/CFSP should be renewed for a further 6 months in order to enable the Council to further assess their implementation. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Having assessed the implementation of the Minsk agreements, Decision 2014/512/CFSP should be renewed for a further 6 months in order to enable the Council to further assess their implementation.

| (5) | Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Decision 2014/512/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The first subparagraph of Article 9(1) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘1.   This Decision shall apply until 31 July 2017.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2016.

For the Council

The President

M. LAJČÁK

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/512/CFSP of 31 July 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine (OJ L 229, 31.7.2014, p. 13).

1

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GENESIS HUDSON

, Appellant,

v.

AURAIN KEVIN EDWARDS

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 764

[ November 9 , 2022 ]

Appeal from the C ounty Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Tabitha Blackmon , Judge; L.T. Case No. 21

- 17498

COWE

.

Genesis Hudson, Lauderhill, pro se.

No brief filed on behalf of appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and A RTAU , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5337 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5337

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on triphenyltin hydroxide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mrs. Biggert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on triphenyltin hydroxide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIPHENYLTIN HYDROXIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.96 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to triphenyltin hydroxide) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 544

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal 

Place in Santa Fe, New Mexico, as the ‘‘Santiago E. 

Campos United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 544 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse at South Federal Place 

3 in Santa Fe, New Mexico, shall be known and designated 

4 as the ‘‘Santiago E. Campos United States Courthouse’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

6 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

7 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

8 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

9 to be a reference to the ‘‘Santiago E. Campos United 

10 States Courthouse’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 6, 

2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 544

AN ACT

To designate the United States courthouse at 

Courthouse’’.as the ‘‘Santiago E. Campos United States South Federal Place in Santa Fe, New Mexico,
Exhibit 10.1


 


Amendment No. 1


 


to


Restricted Stock Plan for Non-Employee
Directors


of


3D Systems Corporation


 


Effective as
of July 27, 2005, Section 4(d) of the Restricted Stock Plan for
Non-Employee Directors of 3D Systems Corporation is amended by inserting the
following immediately after the last sentence thereof:


 


“Notwithstanding any other provision of this Plan, any Non-Employee
Director may make a gift or other transfer of any Common Stock awarded or
acquired under the Plan to members of the immediate family of such Non-Employee
Director or to a trust or other form of indirect ownership established by such
Non-Employee Director for his or her benefit or for the benefit of members of
the immediate family of such Non-Employee Director (each also, a “Beneficiary”);
provided that (i) the purpose of such transfer is either estate or
tax planning, (ii) the Non-Employee Director shall continue to be deemed a
beneficial owner of such transferred shares of Common Stock and shall retain
voting and investment control over such shares while the Non-Employee Director
remains a director of the Company and (iii) the Beneficiary shall execute
an agreement with the Company, in form and substance satisfactory to counsel to
the Company, pursuant to which such Beneficiary shall be obligated to hold the
shares of Common Stock so transferred in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the Plan and containing such other terms and conditions as may be
required by counsel to the Company.  For
the purpose of this Section 4(d), the term “immediate family” shall have
the meaning set forth in Rule 16a-1 under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the “Securities Exchange Act”), and the term “beneficial
owner” shall have the meaning set forth in Rule 16a-1 under the Securities
Exchange Act, other than for purposes of determining beneficial ownership of
more than ten percent of any class of equity securities.”
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5207 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Gas Flow Control Valve, 500 milliliters 

minimum. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Gas Flow Control Valve, 

500 milliliters minimum. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GAS FLOW CONTROL VALVE, 500 MILLILITERS 

4 MINIMUM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Gas Flow Control Valve, 500 

milliliters minimum (provided 

for in subheading 

8481.80.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

HR 5207 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                         Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of CUNO Incorporated ("CUNO") of our report dated December 5, 2002, included in
the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders of CUNO.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of CUNO listed in Item
14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the
financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-39763) pertaining to the CUNO Incorporated 1996 Stock
Incentive Plan, the CUNO Incorporated Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan,
and the CUNO Incorporated Savings and Retirement Plan and the registration
statement (Form S-8 No. 333-54388) pertaining to the CUNO Incorporated 1996
Stock Incentive Plan and the CUNO Incorporated Non-employee Directors' Stock
Option Plan of our report dated December 5, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of CUNO.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
December 12, 2002