alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Garry Lee SKINNER, and wife, Judy Cooper Skinner; individually and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals v. PREFERRED CREDIT, also known as Preferred Credit Corporation, also known as Preferred Mortgage Company, also known as T.A.R. Preferred Mortgage Corporation; US Bank N.A.; US Bank NA, ND; Imperial Credit Industries, Inc; Icifc Secured Assets Corporation 1997-1; Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1997-1; Icifc Secured Assets Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1997-2; Icifc Secured Assets Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1997-3; Empire Funding Home Loan Owner Trust 1998-1; Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corporation; Cs First Boston Mortgage Securities Corporation Preferred Mortgage Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 1996-2; Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corporation Preferred Credit Asset-Backed Certificates, Series 1997-1; Bankers Trust Company; Gmac-Residential Funding Corporation; Life Bank; Life Financial Home Loan Owner Trust 1997-3; United Mortgage C.B., LLC; Banc One Financial Services; Imh Assets Corp. Collateralized Asset-Backed Bonds Series 1999-1; and Wilmington Trust Company.

No. 525A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Gary K. Shipman, William G. Wright, Wilmington, A. Holt Rowell, III, Daniel Myers, *651Mt. Pleasant, SC, Eric G. Calhoun, Dallas, TX, for Skinners et al.

Hada V. Haulsee, Ronald R. Davis, Bradley R. Johnson, Winston-Salem, for Preferred Credit Trust.

Robert R. Marcus, Angela L. Little, Greensboro, Daniel J. Tobin, for Impac Funding.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 4th day of October 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals as to additional issues, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."

Plaintiffs shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Accordingly, the new brief of the Plaintiffs shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Gregory A.Wells, Chief Financial Officer of NTS Realty Capital, Inc., the managinggeneral partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.                                       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | August 14, 2009                                |     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Name:  | */s/ Gregory A. Wells*                              | * * |
|   | Gregory A. Wells                                    |     |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer of                          |     |
|   | NTS Realty Capital Inc., the Managing General       |     |
|   | Partner of NTS Realty  Holdings Limited Partnership |     |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5540 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5540

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Gateways and 
Watertrails Network Continuing Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 502 of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 
461 note; Public Law 105-312) is amending by striking subsection (c) 
and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5540

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk July 24, 2012

h0716 

# Order

July 24, 2012

144732

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144732

COA: 300007

Wayne CC: 10

- 001837

- FH

HENRY BROUSSARD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 521 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 521

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2007

 Mr. Hare (for himself, Mr. LaHood, Ms. Schakowsky, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. 
    Costello, Mr. Rush, Mr. Jackson of Illinois, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. 
  Emanuel, Mr. Roskam, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Bean, Mr. Kirk, Mr. 
Weller of Illinois, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Hastert, Mr. Johnson of Illinois, 
Mr. Manzullo, and Mr. Shimkus) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ``Lane Evans Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANE EVANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lane Evans Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lane Evans 
Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
HOME BUILDERS v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE.

No. 343P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 19, 2005.

Karen McDonald, City Attorney, for Fayetteville.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of July 2004 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

"The Stay issued on the 12th of July, 2004 is Dissolved by order of the Court in conference this the 19th day of August 2005."
# Official Journal L 175/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 175 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6418 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 175

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6418 May 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2021/793 of 26 March 2021 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, of the other part, and the implementing Protocol thereto | 1 |
| | * | Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, of the other part | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2021/793 of 26 March 2021 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, of the other part, and the implementing Protocol thereto

1

*

Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark, of the other part

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul B. Carousso, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Paul B. Carousso         
|                      |  | Paul B. Carousso             
|                      |  | Vice President, Finance      
|                      |  | (principal financial officer)
H. R. 5135 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 West 

Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Jamie O. Maugans Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT JAMIE O. MAUGANS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant Jamie O. Maugans 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant Jamie O. Maugans Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### Jeffrey Weisman, Appellant, v Rosemarie Weisman, Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 769]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated September 8, 2004, which denied his motion, inter alia, for sole custody of the parties’ two children and granted the defendant’s cross motion for an award of an attorney’s fee.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a hearing on the motion and cross motion.

The Supreme Court erred in declining to conduct a hearing on the plaintiffs motion, inter alia, for sole custody of the parties’ two children and the defendant’s cross motion for an award of an attorney’s fee. Because the parties presented conflicting affidavits regarding whether the defendant consumed alcohol in violation of their stipulation of settlement, a hearing was required so that the court could make a determination as to custody that serves the best interests of the children *(see Metzger v Metzger,*240 AD2d 642 [1997]; *Robert C.R. v Victoria R.,*143 AD2d 262, 263-264 [1988]; *Biagi v Biagi,*124 AD2d 770 [1986]; *cf. Webster v Webster,*163 AD2d 178 [1990]). The defendant’s cross motion for an award of an attorney’s fee incurred in opposing the plaintiff’s motion should also be considered upon remittitur *(see Cole v Cole,*283 AD2d 602 [2001]; *Matter of Salvati v Salvati,*242 AD2d 538 [1997]; *see also Rosenzweig v Gomez,*250 AD2d 664 [1998]).

*956The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., H. Miller, Ritter and Rivera, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21



                    SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


                 This Second Amendment to Employment Agreement (the
"Amendment") is entered into April 15, 1997 by and between COSTILLA ENERGY,
INC. (the "Company") and HENRY G. MUSSELMAN ("Musselman").

                                R E C I T A L S

                 A.       The Company and Musselman entered into an Employment
Agreement dated September 1, 1996, which Employment Agreement became effective
October 14, 1996 and which was amended by that one certain Amendment to
Employment Agreement dated April 15, 1997 by and between the Company and
Musselman ( collectively, the "Agreement").

                 B.       The Company and Musselman have agreed to modify the
Agreement by this Amendment for the sole purpose of increasing Musselman's
salary under Section 5 of the Agreement to $250,000.

                 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Musselman for good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged
agree to modify the Agreement as follows:

                 1.       Section 5 of the Agreement is deleted and replaced to
read in its entirety as follows:

                 "As compensation for services to be rendered by Musselman, the
                 Company shall pay Musselman a Base Salary at the annual rate
                 of $250,000 beginning on April 15, 1997.  Notwithstanding the
                 quotation of the Base Salary at an annual rate, Musselman will
                 only be paid on a prorata basis for the actual days worked if
                 his employment is terminated."

                 2.       Except as modified by this Agreement, all other terms
of the Original Agreement shall remain unchanged.

                 EXECUTED the date and year first above written.

                                       COSTILLA ENERGY, INC.


                                       By: /s/ Michael J. Grella             
                                          -------------------------------
                                           Michael J. Grella, President


                                           /s/ Henry G. Musselman 
                                          -------------------------------
                                                HENRY G. MUSSELMAN
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4895 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4895

 To prohibit the expenditure of funds for the construction or lease of 
 buildings or space in the District of Columbia for the United States 
                   Government until January 1, 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

 Mr. Gohmert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the expenditure of funds for the construction or lease of 
 buildings or space in the District of Columbia for the United States 
                   Government until January 1, 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The debt of the United States Government is over 9 
        trillion dollars and continues to rise.
            (2) Congress must tighten its fiscal belt to ease the 
        burden of the increasing debt level on United States taxpayers.
            (3) The Federal Government has a responsibility to the 
        taxpayers to make sacrifices in other areas.
            (4) Federal funds that otherwise would be spent on new 
        construction or leasing of Federal buildings would be better 
        spent helping the people of the United States by paying down 
        the Nation's debt.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON THE CONSTRUCTION OR LEASING OF NEW FEDERAL 
              BUILDINGS IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNTIL JANUARY 2009.

    (a) Prohibition.--No funds may be expended for the construction or 
lease of buildings or space in the District of Columbia for any branch 
of the United States Government or any entity within such branch, 
unless a contract for the construction or lease was entered into before 
the date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Exception.--The prohibition in subsection (a) does not apply in 
any case in which the expenditure of funds for the purposes described 
in subsection (a) is necessary in the interests of national security.
    (c) Expiration.--The prohibition under subsection (a) shall expire 
on January 1, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. BORWN.

No. COA05-217.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Stokes (03CRS1379, 03CRS50234, 03CRS50276).

Case reported without published opinion. Remanded for resentencing.
STATE v. THOMAS.

No. COA04-1643.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed December 6, 2005.

Certification Date December 27, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. New trial.
STATE v. LLOYD.

No. COA05-213.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (04CRS6403, 04CRS53540, 04CRS53541).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. George Franklin PAGE.

No. 239A96-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Walter L. Jones, Greensboro, Amiel J. Rossabi, for George Franklin Page.

Valerie B. Spalding, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th day of August 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."