alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**U.S. Office of Special Counsel**

1730 M Street NW, Suite 218

Washington, DC 20036-4505

(202) 804-7163  certification@osc.gov

The U.S. Office of Special Counsel's (OSC) Certification Program allows federal agencies to meet the statutory obligations of 5 U.S.C. § 2302(c), the Dr. Chris Kirkpatrick Whistleblower Protection Act, and the Office of Special Counsel Reauthorization Act of 2017. In addition to the existing requirements of the program, these statutes require agency heads to ensure that their employees receive yearly information about whistleblower protection laws and to provide annual *supervisory* training on how to respond to complaints involving whistleblower protections. Certified agencies must complete this checklist each year to ensure their compliance with ongoing and new annual requirements. The completed checklist should be emailed to certification@osc.gov. Questions about completing this form should be directed to OSC’s Diversity, Outreach, and Training Unit, which can be reached at 202-804-7163 or certification@osc.gov. 

General Information

**Agency or Office Completing Checklist:**Click or tap here to enter text.

	Agency and OIG ☐

	Agency ☐

	OIG ☐

	Component (please indicate parent agency) Click or tap here to enter text.

Contact Information

Please provide the contact information for the official responsible for implementing OSC's Certification Program (the individual’s name and phone number will be placed on OSC’s website as the point of contact once the agency is certified).

Name: Click or tap here to enter text.

Title: Click or tap here to enter text.

Email: Click or tap here to enter text.

Phone: Click or tap here to enter text.

Address (to send certificate): Click or tap here to enter text.

**U.S. Office of Special Counsel’s**

**Annual Certification Checklist**

☐1. Verified that the agency has the most current OSC posters on display throughout the agency

☐2. Confirmed that new employees received information on PPPs and whistleblower disclosures within 180 days of employment (OSC handouts)

☐3. Disseminated (by head of agency or designee) annual notification to all employees emphasizing the importance of whistleblower protection laws and including links to educational information on PPPs and whistleblower disclosures (OSC handouts)

☐4. Trained supervisors on how to respond to complaints alleging a violation of whistleblower protections (OSC in-person or virtual training or PowerPoint presentation)

☐5. Checked the links to OSC’s website on both the agency’s website and intranet

☐6. Ensured that the agency has identified means for disclosing classified information or information prohibited from release by law to the: (I) Special Counsel; (II) the Inspector General of an agency; (III) Congress; or (IV) another employee of the agency who is designated to receive such disclosures.

Comments (optional): Click or tap here to enter text.

Requirement Checklist Information

Signature of official responsible for implementing OSC’s Certification Program:

Confirmation of Completion

# image2.emf

# image1.jpeg
STATE of North Carolina v. Barry Thomas CUMMINGS.

No. 212A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

D. Todd Paris, for Barry Thomas Cummings.

Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, William D. Kenerly, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 19th day of April 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.5
EXECUTION COPY



FIRST AMENDMENT 
TO
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
May 31, 2019
Whereas, Watford Holdings Ltd., a Bermuda corporation (the “Company”), and Robert Hawley (the “Executive”) entered into an employment agreement dated November 30, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”);
Whereas, Section 12.02 of the Employment Agreement provides that the Company and the Executive may amend the Employment Agreement by written agreement executed and delivered to each party; 
Whereas, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as permitted by Section 12.02 thereof;
NOW THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive hereby amend the Employment Agreement as provided herein.
1.    Section 12.09 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end of such Section 12.09: 
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, all payments or benefits that are due after December 31 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which such payment or benefit vests for purposes of Section 457A of the Code, shall be made or provided on such December 31.    
2.    Except as amended herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without modification. 
3.     The provisions of this First Amendment to the Employment Agreement may be amended or waived only by a written agreement executed and delivered by the Company and the Executive. No other course of dealing between the parties to this First Amendment to the Employment Agreement or any delay in exercising any rights hereunder will operate as a waiver of any rights of any such parties.
4.    This First Amendment to the Employment Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two counterparts, any one of which need not contain the signatures of more than one party, but all of which counterparts taken together will constitute one and the same agreement. 
6.    ALL QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE CONSTRUCTION, VALIDITY AND INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE GOVERNED BY THE INTERNAL LAW OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS. 
7.    The parties agree to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of the federal and state courts situated in New York County, New York, for the resolution of any dispute arising under this Agreement or under any share-based award agreements between the Company and the Executive. 


-1-





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Employment Agreement as of the date and year first above written.
	
		
	WATFORD HOLDINGS LTD.

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ John Rathgeber

	 
	Name: John Rathgeber

	 
	Title: Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	EXECUTIVE

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Robert Hawley

	 
	Name: Robert Hawley








-2-
# C_2017027EN.01000401.xml

| 27.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/4

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 23 January 2017

appointing a member and an alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for Slovakia and United Kingdom

(2017/C 27/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2062/94 of 18 July 1994 establishing a European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (1), and in particular Article 8 thereof,

1

Having regard to the list of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States and by the employees' and the employers' organisations,

Having regard to the lists of members and alternate members of the Advisory Committee on Safety and Health at Work,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 17 October 2016 (2) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period from 8 November 2016 to 7 November 2019. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 17 October 2016 (2) the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period from 8 November 2016 to 7 November 2019.

2

| (2) | The government of Slovakia has submitted one nomination for a post to be filled. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The government of Slovakia has submitted one nomination for a post to be filled.

| (3) | The employers' organisation BUSINESSEUROPE has submitted one nomination for a post to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The employers' organisation BUSINESSEUROPE has submitted one nomination for a post to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are appointed member and alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the period ending on 7 November 2019:

I.   GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES

| Country | Member | Alternate member |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Slovakia | Ms Lucia SABOVÁ DANKOVÁ | |

Country

Member

Alternate member

Slovakia

Ms Lucia SABOVÁ DANKOVÁ

II.   REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYERS' ORGANISATIONS

| Country | Member | Alternate member |
| --- | --- | --- |
| United Kingdom | | Mr Terry WOOLMER |

Country

Member

Alternate member

United Kingdom

Mr Terry WOOLMER

Article 2

The Council shall appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 23 January 2017.

For the Council

The President

R. GALDES

---

(1)  OJ L 216, 20.8.1994, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 17 October 2016 appointing the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (OJ C 386, 20.10.2016, p. 3).

2

---
Exhibit 99.1

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Board of DirectorsSE Financial Corp.

We have reviewed the accompanying balance sheet of SE Financial Corp. (the “Company”)and subsidiaries as of July 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income for the three-month and nine-month periods endedJuly 31, 2004 and 2003, the consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended July 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidatedstatement of changes in stockholders’ equity for the nine-month periods ended July 31, 2004 and 2003.  These financial statements arethe responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial dataand making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conductedin accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of an opinionregarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware    of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying financial    statements for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting    principles.

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States), the balance sheet as of October 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes inretained earnings, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and in our report dated December 12, 2003, except forNote 14 as to which the date is January 15, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PAAugust 10, 2004

 

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5313 

To suspend temporarily the duty on a thermoplastic biodegradable polymer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. SHAYS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on a thermoplastic 

biodegradable polymer. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THERMOPLASTIC BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, 

dimethyl ester, polymer with 

1,4-butanediol and 

decanedioic acid (CAS No. 

59914–11–3) (provided for in 

subheading 3907.99.01) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5313 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-20463

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROSA MARIA BENAVIDES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-97-CR-35-25

- - - - - - - - - -

July 1, 1999

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rosa Benavides appeals from her conviction for conspiracy

to possess with the intent to distribute heroin, 21 U.S.C.

§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. She argues that the evidence

was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict and that the

“reasonable notice” requirement of Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) was

violated when the Government gave notice of its intent to

introduce evidence of Benavides’ prior drug conviction only one

day prior to the start of the trial. Our review of the record 
No. 98-20463

-2-

and of the arguments and authorities convinces us that no

reversible error was committed. The evidence was not

insufficient. See United States v. McCarty, 36 F.3d 1349, 1358

(5th Cir. 1994). The district court did not abuse its discretion

by admitting the Rule 404(b) evidence of Benavides’ prior

narcotics conviction. See United States v. Powers, 168 F.3d 741,

748 (5th Cir. 1999). 

AFFIRMED.
STATE v. WOODARD.

No. COA05-597.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from Cabarrus (02CRS53583).

Case without published opinion. No error; remanded with instructions.
Order filed August 31, 2021

.

In The


## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 21

- 00315

- CV

___________ SOLA ENERGY SOURCES, LLC , Appellant

V.

SILVERBOW RESOURCES OPERATING, LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harr is County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 321010127

O R D E R

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter

for the 127th District Court informed this court that appellant had not made
arrangements for payment for the repo r ter’s record. On June 22, 2021 , the clerk of
this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those issues that do
not require a reporter ’ s record unless appellant, within 15 days of notice, provided
this court with proof of payment for th e record. See T ex. R. App

. P. 37.3(c).
Appellant filed no reply.Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal within thirty

days of the date of this order. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court
will dismiss the appea l for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson.
IN RE C.J.H.D.

No. COA04-1462.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (04J288).

Case reported without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5426 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5426

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase the per 
 resident payment floor for direct graduate medical education payments 
                      under the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2008

  Mr. Pascrell (for himself and Mr. Lewis of Kentucky) introduced the 
following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 
 and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 
    to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to increase the per 
 resident payment floor for direct graduate medical education payments 
                      under the Medicare Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASING TO 100 PERCENT OF THE LOCALITY ADJUSTED NATIONAL 
              AVERAGE PER RESIDENT AMOUNT THE PAYMENT FLOOR FOR DIRECT 
              GRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION PAYMENTS UNDER THE MEDICARE 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 1886(h)(2)(D)(iii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395ww(h)(2)(D)(iii)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' after ``70 percent,''; and
            (2) by inserting after ``85 percent,'' the following: ``for 
        the cost reporting period beginning during fiscal year 2008 
        shall not be less than 90 percent, for the cost reporting 
        period beginning during fiscal year 2009 shall not be less than 
        95 percent, and for the cost reporting period beginning during 
        fiscal year 2010 shall not be less than 100 percent,''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5457 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5457

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Deltamethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2008

 Mr. Cleaver introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Deltamethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DELTAMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.26 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--The Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States is further amended by striking heading 9902.01.49.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section apply with 
respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, 
on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 2, 2021 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00142-CV 

RODDRICK SMITH, Appellant 

V. 

ANDREW PEPPER, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-05325-D 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Molberg, and Justice Smith 

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns 

The filing fee and docketing statement in this appeal are past due. By postcard 

dated March 4, 2021, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed 

appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant 

that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated 

March 4, 2021, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in 

this case.1

 We directed appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We 

cautioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. 

1

 Both the filing fee notice and the docketing statement notice were returned to the Court as 

undeliverable. The clerk’s office attempted to contact appellant by telephone, but was unsuccessful. 
 –2– 

To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, or 

otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(b)(c). 

210142F.P05 

 

/Robert D. Burns, III/

ROBERT D. BURNS, III 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

RODDRICK SMITH, Appellant 

No. 05-21-00142-CV V. 

ANDREW PEPPER, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-20-05325-

D. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice 

Burns. Justices Molberg and Smith 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered July 2, 2021