alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5333 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5333

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6-dibromo-4-cyanophenyl 
                         octanoate/heptanoate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2008

 Mr. Price of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,6-dibromo-4-cyanophenyl 
                         octanoate/heptanoate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,6-DIBROMO-4-CYANOPHENYL OCTANOATE/HEPTANOATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.57 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2,6-dibromo-4-cyanophenyl 
octanoate/heptanoate) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of SeaChange International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William C. Styslinger, III, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                 
|/s/    WILLIAM C. STYSLINGER, III                                                                
|William C. Styslinger, III President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director

April 14, 2008

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission with this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




I,
      David
      A. Chaput, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10 -QSB/A
      of
      General Moly, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13/A(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on
      Form
      10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
      results of operations of General Moly, Inc.




Dated:
      November 15, 2007






By:
            /s/
                David A. ChaputName:
            David
                A. ChaputTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mooney Aerospace Group, Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)      The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated:  June 13, 2003                  By: /s/ J. Nelson Happy
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           J. Nelson Happy
                                           Vice Chairman, President &
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
                                           (Principal Executive Financial and
                                           Accounting Officer)





                                       39
STATE of North Carolina v. James Reginal ESTEP, Jr.

No. 388P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Charlotte Gail Blake, Boone, for James Reginald Estep, Jr.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of July 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
Gary HARRIS, Joseph B. Kinard, John S. Eagle, Waymon Tate, Jr., Rayford Jones, John L. McGriff, Lesley G. Bellinger, the Plaintiffs suing on behalf of Saint Luke Missionary Baptist Church, Plaintiffs v. Clifford J. MATTHEWS, Jr., Sharla Byrd, and Aaron Moore, Defendants.

No. 479PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

P. Marshall Yoder, Joshua B. Durham, Charlotte, for Matthews.

H. Edward Knox, Lisa Godfrey, Charlotte, for Gary Harris, Joseph B. Kinard, et al.

Kenneth R. Raynor, Charlotte, for Byrd.

David W. Gilpin, Charlotte, for Moore.

Shirley Fulton, for St. Luke Baptist Church.

*AMENDED ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of cross appeal from the North Carolina Court of *298Appeals, filed by Plaintiffs on the 9th day of September 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of cross appeal is

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brian F. Lavin,President and Chief Executive Officer of NTS Realty Capital, Inc., themanaging general partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.                                       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofthe Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | November 6, 2009                               |     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Name:  | /s/ *Brian F. Lavin*                                | * * |
|   | Brian F. Lavin                                      |     |
| Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer of            |     |
|   | NTS Realty Capital, Inc., the Managing General |     |
|   | Partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership  |     |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Twanprece Neshawn IVEY.

No. 458PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for Twanprece N. Ivey.

Clinton C. Hicks, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of August 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of August 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
# L_2012158EN.01001501.xml

| 19.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 158/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 158/15

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 518/2012

of 18 June 2012

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of June 2012 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 for poultrymeat

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat (3), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of June 2012 for the subperiod from 1 July to 30 September 2012 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged for the subperiod from 1 July to 30 September 2012 under Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 June 2012.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 June 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

3

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Order No | Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.7.2012-30.9.2012
  (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 09.4410 | 0,321235 |
| 2 | 09.4411 | 0,452557 |
| 3 | 09.4412 | 0,357018 |
| 4 | 09.4420 | 0,487807 |
| 6 | 09.4422 | 0,477106 |

Group No

Order No

Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.7.2012-30.9.2012

(%)

1

09.4410

0,321235

2

09.4411

0,452557

3

09.4412

0,357018

4

09.4420

0,487807

6

09.4422

0,477106

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5400 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 695
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5400

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2008

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             April 10, 2008

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, as the ``Sgt. 
              Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SGT. MICHAEL M. KASHKOUSH POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sgt. Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. 
Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 695

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5400

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, as the ``Sgt. 
              Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 10, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 13

- 00466

- CV

KARL WAWAROSKY , Appellant

V.

FAST GROUP HOUSTON, INC. , Appellee

Appeal from the 157th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2011

- 62792).

TO THE 157TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 17th day of February 2015, the case upon appeal to

revise or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these

words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on September 14, 2012. After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment contains no reversible error. Accordingly, the

Court affirms the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that the appellant, Karl Wawarosky, pay all appellate costs.The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered February 17, 2015.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle. Opinion delivered by Justice

Huddle.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court

in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognize d, obeyed, and executed.

May 1, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
ANTONELLI v. ECR OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.

No. COA05-1092.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
Judith Lynn JACKSON v. Fred H. JACKSON, Jr.

No. 172A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 4, 2005.

*863Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 169 N.C.App. 46, 610 S.E.2d 731 (2005), affirming an order entered on 1 March 2004 by Judge Kimbrell Kelly Tucker in District Court, Cumberland County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 October 2005.

Reid, Lewis, Deese, Nance & Person, LLP, by Renny W. Deese, Fayetteville, for plaintiff-appellant.

Sullivan & Grace, P.A., by Nancy L. Grace, Raleigh, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4972 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 5-[[4- 

chloro-6-[[2-[[4-chloro-6-[[7-[[4-(ethenylsulfonyl)phenyl]azo]-8-hydroxy3,6-disulfo-1-naphthalenyl]amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]ethyl](2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-3-[[4- 

(ethenylsulfonyl)phenyl]azo]-4-hydroxy-, sodium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,7- 

Naphthalenedisulfonic acid, 5-[[4-chloro-6-[[2-[[4-chloro6-[[7-[[4-(ethenylsulfonyl)phenyl]azo]-8-hydroxy-3,6- 

disulfo-1-naphthalenyl]amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2- 

yl]amino]ethyl](2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-1,3,5-triazin-2- 

yl]amino]-3-[[4-(ethenylsulfonyl)phenyl]azo]-4-hydroxy-, 

sodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

HR 4972 IH 

1 SECTION 1. 2,7-NAPHTHALENEDISULFONIC ACID, 5-[[4- 

2 CHLORO-6-[[2-[[4-CHLORO-6-[[7-[[4- 

3 (ETHENYLSULFONYL)PHENYL]AZO]-8-HY4 DROXY-3,6-DISULFO-1- 

5 NAPHTHALENYL]AMINO]-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2- 

6 YL]AMINO]ETHYL](2-HYDROXYETHYL)AMINO]- 

7 1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2-YL]AMINO]-3-[[4- 

8 (ETHENYLSULFONYL)PHENYL]AZO]-4-HY9 DROXY-, SODIUM SALT. 

10 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

11 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

12 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

13 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2,7-Naphthalenedisulfonic 

acid, 5-[[4-chloro-6-[[2-[[4- 

chloro-6-[[7-[[4- 

(ethenylsulfonyl)phenyl]azo]- 

8-hydroxy-3,6-disulfo-1- 

naphthalenyl]amino]-1,3,5- 

triazin-2-yl]amino]ethyl](2- 

hydroxyethyl)amino]-1,3,5- 

triazin-2-yl]amino]-3-[[4- 

(ethenylsulfonyl)phenyl]azo]- 

4-hydroxy-, sodium salt 

(CAS No. 171599–85–2) 

(provided for in subheading 

3204.16.30) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

16 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

17 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, Bruce D. Hansen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of General Moly, Inc. for thequarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of General Moly, Inc.

 

Dated: December 9, 2009

 
|   | By:                           | /s/ Bruce D.  Hansen    |
|--------|-------------------------------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:                         | Bruce D. Hansen         |
|   | Title:                        | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer) |
|        |                               |                         |  |

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,013,407
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,419,982
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    803,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,236,389
<PP&E>                                         400,798
<DEPRECIATION>                               (170,853)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,629,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,646,597
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,363
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,852,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,629,570
<SALES>                                      2,322,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,322,749
<CGS>                                        1,060,667
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,060,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,821,290
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,828,879
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,378,514)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,378,514)
<DISCONTINUED>                             (1,088,272)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,466,786)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.51)



</TABLE>
STATE v. LEWIS.

No. COA03-785-2.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Wake (01CRS108653, 01CRS108654, 01CRS83310).

Case reported without published opinion. Remanded for resentencing.
IN RE H.M.L.

No. COA04-1478.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.