alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5411 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5411

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Methyl (E)-methoxyimino-
        2(2-o-tolyloxymethyl) phenyl) acetate (kresoxim methyl).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2008

Mr. Bishop of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Methyl (E)-methoxyimino-
        2(2-o-tolyloxymethyl) phenyl) acetate (kresoxim methyl).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL (E)-METHOXYIMINO-2(2-O-TOLYLOXYMETHYL) PHENYL) 
              ACETATE (KRESOXIM METHYL) .

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Methyl (E)-methoxyimino-2(2-
o-tolyloxymethyl) phenyl) acetate (kresoxim methyl) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Mark F. Scarcello, an Attorney, Resignor.

[801 NYS2d 170]

Voluntary resignation accepted and name removed from roll of attorneys *(see Matter of Manown,*240 AD2d 83 [1998]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
# L_2012294EN.01000101.xml

| 24.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 294/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 294/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 975/2012

of 19 October 2012

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Filderkraut / Filderspitzkraut (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany's application to register the name ‧Filderkraut / Filderspitzkraut‧ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany's application to register the name ‧Filderkraut / Filderspitzkraut‧ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 October 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 44, 16.2.2012, p. 45.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

GERMANY

Filderkraut / Filderspitzkraut (PGI)

---
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH CIR . 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-50922 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JAMES SUPERVILLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-96-CR-147-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - August 6, 1997 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1 James Superville appeals from the district court’s denial of
h is motion to suppress evidence, claiming that the eviden ce was obtained following an unconstitutional investigatory stop. Supe rville entered into a conditional guilty plea agreement allowing for the appeal of the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress. Superville has also filed a motion to supplement the record on appeal with new evidence, arguing that the newly discoveredevidence discredits one of the police officers’ testimony. We will

not consider factual evidence that has not been presented in the district court. U n ited States v. Flores , 887 F.2d 543, 546 (5th Cir. 1989). The motion is DENIED. With respect to the district court’s ruling following the hearing on the motion to suppress, we review the district court’s
factual findings for clear error and its determination that
reasonable suspicion existed to stop Superville d e novo . U nited
States v. Chavez-Villar real , 3 F.3d 124, 126 (5th Cir. 1993);
Ornelas v. United States , 116 S. Ct. 1657, 1663 (1996). The evidence is viewed in a light most favorable to the Government as the prevailing party. United States v. Michelletti , 13 F.3d 838, 841 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc). An investigatory stop is proper if based upon reasonable suspicion that the person is engaged in, or will be engaged in criminal activity. Terry v. Ohio , 392 U.S. 1, 21-22 (1968). To establish the existence of reasonable suspicion
the prosecution must demonstrate a “minim um level of objective justification for the officer’s actions, measured in light of the totality of the circumstances.” United States v. Tellez , 11 F.3d 530, 532 (5th Cir. 1993).

A review of the hearing on the motion to suppress reveals that
the investigatory stop occurred after the corroboration of information provided by informants and other tips regarding Superville’s drug activities. Viewing the totality of circumstances in light most favorable to the Government, there wasreasonable suspicion to stop and question the defendant.

AFFIRMED.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4183 — Foodco Pastries/Tele Pizza)

(2006/C 114/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 21 April 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
Exhibit 16.1

                                BDO Dunwoody LLP
                         4150, rue Sainte-Catherine O.,
                                 Bur./Suite 600
                         Montreal Quebec H3Z 2Y5 Canada

                                                              April 13, 2000

Via Facsimile

Mr. Louis Canant
Staff Accountant
Office of Small Business
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

                                                              Re: Docuport, Inc.

Dear Mr. Canant:

     We are in receipt of the Form 8-K from Docuport, Inc. (the "Company"). We
are in agreement with the statements made in response to Item 304(a). In
addition, during the last two fiscal years and since our not being rehired this
year, there have been no disagreements between ourselves and the Company, nor
have any of the enumerated reportable events occurred.

                                        /s/ BDO Dunwoody LLP
STATE v. BROWN.

No. COA05-17.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed March 7, 2006.

Certification Date March 27, 2006.

Appeal from Burke (02CRS50572)

Case without published opinion. No error; remanded for resentencing.
Exhibit32.2

GLOBAL SIGNAL INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,ASADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global SignalInc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, William T. Freeman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                     |
|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                    |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

/s/   William T.Freeman                                      WilliamT. Freeman  Executive Vice President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Assistant Secretary

August 10,2005

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Global Signal Inc. and will beretained by Global Signal Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Thiscertification accompanies this report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the"Exchange Act"). Such certification will notbe deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to theextent that the registrant specifically incorporates it byreference.

----
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 39874]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14252]



[[Page 39874]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Committee Management Renewals

    The National Science Foundation (NSF) management officials having 
responsibility for the advisory committees listed below have determined 
that renewing these groups for another two years is necessary and in 
the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed upon the Director, National Science Foundation (NSF), by 42 
U.S.C. 1861 et seq. This determination follows consultation with the 
Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration.
    Committees:

Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and Engineering 
#1115
Advisory Committee for Mathematical and Physical Sciences #66
Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences #1171
Business and Operations Advisory Committee #9556
Committee on Equal Opportunities in Sciences and Engineering #1173
Proposal Review Panel for Astronomical Sciences #1186
Proposal Review Panel for Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and 
Transport Systems #1189
Proposal Review Panel for Chemistry #1191
Proposal Review Panel for Civil, Mechanical, and Manufacturing 
Innovation #1194
Proposal Review Panel for Computer and Network Systems #1207
Proposal Review Panel for Computing & Communication Foundations #1192
Proposal Review Panel for Cyberinfrastructure #1185
Proposal Review Panel for Electrical, Communications, and Cyber Systems 
#1196
Proposal Review Panel for Engineering Education and Centers #173
Proposal Review Panel for Graduate Education #57
Proposal Review Panel for Human Resource Development #1199
Proposal Review Panel for Information and Intelligent Systems #1200
Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research #1203
Proposal Review Panel for Mathematical Sciences #1204
Proposal Review Panel for Physics #1208
Proposal Review Panel for Polar Programs #1209
Proposal Review Panel for Undergraduate Education #1214

    Effective date for renewal is June 29, 2022. For more information, 
please contact Crystal Robinson, NSF, at (703) 292-8687.

    Dated: June 29, 2022.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2022-14252 Filed 7-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
STATE v. WILLIS.

No. COA05-569.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Haywood (98CRS2255, 98CRS2674, 98CRS2675).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5498 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5498

To increase the cap on the obligation of receipts for the Crime Victims 
                                 Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2008

 Mr. Poe (for himself, Mr. Costa, Mr. Weiner, Mr. Braley of Iowa, and 
Mr. Reichert) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To increase the cap on the obligation of receipts for the Crime Victims 
                                 Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE OF CAP ON THE OBLIGATION OF RECEIPTS FOR THE CRIME 
              VICTIMS FUND.

    Section 513 of Division B of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 
2008 (Public Law 110-161) is amended by striking ``$590,000,000'' and 
inserting ``$661,000,000''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. LONG.

No. COA05-778.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed March 7, 2006.

Certification Date March 27, 2006.

Appeal from Gaston (04CRS61036, 04CRS61037)

Case without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. MATHIS.

No. COA05-454.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Haywood (03CRS1763, 03CRS1764).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5361 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on plastic lamp-holder housings 

containing sockets. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on plastic lampholder housings containing sockets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PLASTIC LAMP-HOLDER HOUSINGS CON4 TAINING SOCKETS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.29 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 lamp-holder housings of plastic, containing sockets) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2011’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5361 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6577

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DONALD TERRELL RICE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (CR-99-902; CA-01-1913-7-24) Submitted: June 28, 2004 Decided: July 16, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Terrell Rice, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Donald Terrell Rice seeks a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Rice has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Rice’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NO. 12-15-00157-CR

ON APPEAL FROM THE 159TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

CAUSE NO. 2013-0744

STANFORD JONES, JR. §

§

IN THE 12TH COURT OF APPEALS

§ OF

vs. §

§

STATE OF TEXAS § TYLER, TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE APPELLANT'S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT:

Now comes Stanford Jones, Sr., Appellant in the above styled and numbered 

cause, and moves this Court to grant an extension of time to file appellant's brief, 

pursuant to Rule 38.6 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, and for good 

cause shows the following:

1. This case is on appeal from the 217th District Court of Angelina 

County, Texas.

2. The case below was styled the STATE OF TEXAS vs. Stanford Jones, 

Sr., and numbered 2013-0744. Appellant was convicted of Arson. 

4. Appellant was assessed a sentence of Twenty (20) years in Texas 

Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division on May 14, 2015. 

5. Notice of appeal was given on June 10, 2015. 

6. The clerk's record was filed on July 10, 2015; the reporter's record was 

filed on June 29, 2015. 

7. The appellate brief was presently due on August 12, 2015. 

8. Appellant requests an extension of time of thirty (30) days from the 

ACCEPTED

12-15-00157-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

8/12/2015 2:51:29 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 8/12/2015 2:51:29 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
current due date.

9. No extensions to file the brief have been received in this cause.

10. Defendant is currently incarcerated.

11. Appellant relies on the following facts as good cause for the requested 

extension:

Counsel currently has ten separate briefs due in the 12th Court of Appeals and 

the 9th Court of Appeals, which include four due in to the this court in the month of 

August. Due to the time required to review records of each appeal, counsel is 

requesting an extension of thirty days.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant prays that this 

Court grant this Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief, and for such other 

and further relief as the Court may deem appropriate.

Respectfully submitted:

 /s/John D. Reeves

____________________

John D. Reeves

Attorney at Law

1007 Grant

Lufkin, Texas 75901

Phone (936) 632-160

Fax: (936) 632-1640

tessabellus@yahoo.com

SBOT # 16723000

Counsel for Appellant
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Pursuant to Tex. R. App. 10.1 (5), certify that I, the undersigned conferred 

with opposing counsel who is not opposed to an extension.

/s/John D. Reeves

___________________________

John D. Reeves

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Appellant’s 

Motion to Extend Time to file Appellant’s Brief on this 12th day of August, 2015 

forwarded to State’s Attorney, April Ayers-Perez, Angelina County, by electronic 

service at aprerez@angelinacounty.net.

/s/John D. Reeves

__________________________

John D. Reeves

Attorney for Appellant, 

Stanford Jones, Sr.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Section 1350 Certification of the
Chief Financial Officer

In connection
with the Annual Report of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ingrid Mittelstaedt,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                        |                          
|----------------------- | -------------------------
|Date: December 12, 2006 |                          
|                        |                          
|                        | /s/ Ingrid Mittelstaedt  
|                        |                          
|                        | Ingrid Mittelstaedt      
|                        | Chief
  Financial Officer

---