alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GUILFORD COUNTY v. SMITH.

No. 274P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

James A. Dickens, Assistant Guilford County Attorney, for Guilford County.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of June 2005 by Defendant to Amend Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of June 2005."
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of QuadraMed Corporation:



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 333-38309, 333-36189,
333-44985, 333-55775, 333-66793, 333-80617, and 333-87067) and S-8 (Nos. 333-16385, 333-35937, 333-39796, 333-56171, 333-75945, and 333-87426) of QuadraMed Corporation of our report dated February 11, 2004, except for the second paragraph of Note 18
as to which the date is February 25, 2004, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 11, 2004, except for the second paragraph
of Note 18 as to which the date is February 25, 2004, relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/    BDO Seidman, LLPBDO Seidman, LLP




San Jose, California

March 15, 2004
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1 Statement re computation of per share earnings

Pro forma earnings per share - basic, are based upon the Company's weighted
average number of common shares outstanding. The shares issued to the former
Empire stockholders in the merger, excluding the 3,824,511 contingent shares
which were placed in escrow, were considered outstanding for all periods
presented. The shares of the former Integrated shareholders were considered
outstanding only from the September 17, 1999 merger date.

                                                   1999         1998

Pro forma net income                             $1,308,676    $1,571,912
                                                 ==========    ==========
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic       7,327,663     5,560,250
Shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive            28,522          ----
options
Less: shares assumed repurchased                      (206)          ----
                                                      -----          ----
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted     7,356,186     5,560,250
                                                  =========     =========
Pro forma earnings per share -- basic                 $0.18         $0.28
Pro forma earnings per share - diluted                $0.18         $0.28
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5290 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain light absorbing photo 

dyes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. FERGUSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain light 

absorbing photo dyes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN LIGHT ABSORBING PHOTO DYES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.20 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Morpholine,4-[4,5-dihydro-4-[3-[5-hydroxy-1-methyl-3- 

7 (4-morpholinylcarbonyl)-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]-2- 

8 propenylidene]-1-methyl-5-oxo-1H-pyrazol-3-yl]carbonyl]-, 

9 potassium salt; 1,4-benzenedisulfonic acid, 2-[4-[5-[1- 

10 (2,5-disulfophenyl)-1,5-dihydro-3- 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5290 IH

1 [(methylamino)carbonyl]-5-oxo-4H-pyrazol-4-ylidene]-3- 

2 (2-oxo-1-pyrrolidinyl)- 1,3-pentadienyl]-5-hydroxy-3- 

3 [(methylamino)carbonyl]-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]-, 

4 pentapotassium salt) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

5 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

7 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

8 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# L_2016245EN.01000101.xml

| 14.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 245/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 245/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1644

of 7 September 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Φάβα Φενεού (Fava Feneou) (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Greece's application to register the name ‘Φάβα Φενεού’ (Fava Feneou) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Greece's application to register the name ‘Φάβα Φενεού’ (Fava Feneou) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Φάβα Φενεού’ (Fava Feneou) should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Φάβα Φενεού’ (Fava Feneou) should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Φάβα Φενεού’ (Fava Feneou) (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 September 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 164, 5.5.2016, p. 7.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5334 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5334

 To suspend temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing Methyl 
  2-[({[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl}amino)sulfonyl]-4-
  [(mesylamino)methyl]benzoate Methyl 4-iodo-2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-
        1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)ureidosulfonyl]benzoate, sodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2008

 Mr. Price of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing Methyl 
  2-[({[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl}amino)sulfonyl]-4-
  [(mesylamino)methyl]benzoate Methyl 4-iodo-2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-
        1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)ureidosulfonyl]benzoate, sodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRODUCT MIXTURES CONTAINING METHYL 2-[({[(4,6-DIMETHOXY-2-
              PYRIMIDINYL)AMINO] CARBONYL}AMINO)SULFONYL]-4-
              [(MESYLAMINO)METHYL]BENZOATE METHYL 4-IODO-2-[3-(4-
              METHOXY-6-METHYL-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2-
              YL)UREIDOSULFONYL]BENZOATE, SODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Product mixtures    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          containing Methyl                                                  31/2011.......
                          2-[({[(4,6-
                          dimethoxy-2-
                          pyrimidinyl)amino
                          ]
                          carbonyl}amino)su
                          lfonyl]-4-
                          [(mesylamino)meth
                          yl]benzoate
                          Methyl 4-iodo-2-
                          [3-(4-methoxy-6-
                          methyl-1,3,5-
                          triazin-2-
                          yl)ureidosulfonyl
                          ]benzoate, sodium
                          salt (CAS No.
                          208465-21-8
                          144550-36-7)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3808.93.15)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NO. 07-07-0355-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	OCTOBER 3, 2007

	______________________________

	IN RE RODGER WAYNE MITCHELL, RELATOR

	_________________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	MEMORANDUM OPINION

	Relator Rodger Wayne Mitchell, appearing pro se, filed a petition seeking relief by writ of mandamus.  We will deny his petition.

	According to relator’s petition, on July 19, 2007, the trial court denied his motion to vacate the portion of a judgment mandating the sentences imposed on him in criminal cause numbers A3024-0506 and A2823-0205, 64th District Court of Castro County, run consecutively.  He seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the trial court to so act. 

	Courts will issue mandamus to correct a clear abuse of discretion or the violation of a duty imposed by law when there is no other adequate remedy available by appeal.  Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); see In re Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding) (applying Walker standard on adequacy of appellate remedy).  It is the relator’s burden to show entitlement to the relief being requested. See Johnson v. Fourth Court of Appeals, 700 S.W.2d 916, 917 (Tex. 1985) (orig. proceeding).   

	For the reasons that follow, we cannot grant the relief relator’s petition requests.  First, the party filing a petition for a writ of mandamus bears the burden of providing the court with a sufficient record to establish the petitioner’s right to mandamus relief.  Tex. R. App. P. 52.7; In re Fox, 141 S.W.3d 795, 797 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2004) (orig. proceeding).  The rules that govern our review of relator’s petition require, for example, that the petition be accompanied by a certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying proceeding.  Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1).  See also Tex. R. App. P. 52.3(j) (required contents of appendix to petition include certified or sworn copy of “any order complained of”).  Relator has not submitted an appendix or any other material constituting a record to support his petition.  He therefore cannot demonstrate that the trial court has abused its discretion or violated a duty imposed by law. 

	Second, as noted, one seeking mandamus relief must show that he has no adequate remedy by appeal.  Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d at 136.  Relator’s petition does not explain why his complaint over his stacked sentences was not, or could not have been, addressed on direct appeal.  For this reason also, relator’s petition must be denied.

	The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.1	 

						James T. Campbell

						           Justice
STATE v. SOUTHERN.

No. COA05-535.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from Alamance (03CRS60744, 03CRS60745).

Case without published opinion. No error.
- Home
- Education
- Modeling Marine Ecosystems with Virtual Reality
- Observations and Models Module
- Student Worksheets

# Observations and Models Module

## Observations and Models Module Worksheets 

There are five worksheets for the Observations and Models module. Click on the links below to download them in PDF format. 

          -                   Worksheet #1 - Estimated Temperature (inland and coastal) ** 
          -                    Worksheet #2 - Hawaiian Buoy Temperature Model **
          -                     Worksheet #3 - Hawaiian Buoy Temperature Data **
          -                      Worksheet #4 - Strawberry Count Sampling**
          -                       Worksheet #5 - Model Validation: Lobster Biomass**
          - **Download All Worksheets****

Modeling Marine Ecosystems Home

----

##### **Modules**

Ocean Food Webs Module

Observation and Models Module
            -  Module Activities 
            - Student Worksheets
            -  Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) 

Observation and Models Module

Predators and Prey Module

######         Social     

              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 
              - 

##### **Last updated:**

######  						 03/13/23 					

**Author:** NOAA

How to cite this article

Contact Us

##### 					Feedback

                -  Provide Feedback 
                -  Contact Us
                -  Report an error

##### 					Social

                - 
                - 
                - 
*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
							About NOS						- About Us
- NOS Program Offices
- Media Inquiries
- Website Acknowledgements
- Site Index
- Disclaimer
							More Resources						- Freedom of Information Act
- Accessibility
- Information Quality
- Privacy Policy
- NOS For Employees
- USA.gov
-  Department of Commerce
-  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
-  National Ocean Service
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 539 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 539

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and extend the 
            energy efficient commercial buildings deduction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2007

Ms. Schwartz (for herself and Mr. Baird) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and extend the 
            energy efficient commercial buildings deduction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Buildings for the 21st Century 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE AND EXTENSION OF ENERGY EFFICIENT COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS 
              DEDUCTION.

    (a) Increase in Amount of Deduction.--Section 179D of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to energy efficient commercial buildings 
deduction) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1)(A) by striking ``$1.80'' and 
        inserting ``$2.25'', and
            (2) in subsection (d)(1)(A) by striking ``$.60 for $1.80'' 
        and inserting ``$.75 for $2.25''.
    (b) Extension.--Subsection (h) of section 179D of such Code 
(relating to termination) is amended by striking ``December 31, 2008'' 
and inserting ``December 31, 2013''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service in taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2006.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the " Company "), for the Fiscal yearend June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report "), I, Donald Danks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and



(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Donald Danks

Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  

October 28, 201

1
# L_2016275DE.01005401.xml

| 12.10.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 275/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 275/54

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2016/1199 der Kommission vom 22. Juli 2016 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012 in Bezug auf Betriebsgenehmigungen für den Flugbetrieb mit leistungsbasierter Navigation, die Zertifizierung von und die Aufsicht über Datendienstleister und den Offshore-Hubschrauberbetrieb und zur Berichtigung der genannten Verordnung

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 198 vom 23. Juli 2016
  )

Seite 21, Anhang, Nummer 3 Buchstabe f zur Einfügung eines neuen Punktes CAT.OP.MPA.182 in Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012, Anhang IV (Teil-CAT) Teilabschnitt B Abschnitt 1:

Anstatt:

„Der Betreiber hat sicherzustellen, dass ausreichende Mittel für den Flug und die Landung am Bestimmungsflugplatz oder an einem Bestimmungsausweichflugplatz zur Verfügung stehen, falls die Fähigkeit zur Nutzung des beabsichtigten Anflug- und Landeverfahrens verloren geht.“

muss es heißen:

„Der Betreiber hat sicherzustellen, dass ausreichende Mittel zur Navigation und Landung am Bestimmungsflugplatz oder an einem Bestimmungsausweichflugplatz zur Verfügung stehen, falls die Fähigkeit zur Nutzung des beabsichtigten Anflug- und Landeverfahrens verloren geht.“

Seite 31, Anhang, Nummer 5 Buchstabe e zur Einfügung eines neuen Punktes NCC.OP.153 in Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012, Anhang VI (Teil-NCC) Teilabschnitt B; Seite 33, Anhang, Nummer 6 Buchstabe e zur Einfügung eines neuen Punktes NCO.OP.142 in Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012, Anhang VII (Teil-NCO) Teilabschnitt B; Seite 36, Anhang, Nummer 7 Buchstabe e zur Einfügung eines neuen Punktes SPO.OP.152 in Verordnung (EU) Nr. 965/2012, Anhang VIII (Teil-SPO) Teilabschnitt B:

Anstatt:

„Der verantwortliche Pilot hat sicherzustellen, dass ausreichende Mittel für den Flug und die Landung am Bestimmungsflugplatz oder an einem Bestimmungsausweichflugplatz zur Verfügung stehen, falls die Fähigkeit zur Nutzung des beabsichtigten Anflug- und Landeverfahrens verloren geht.“

muss es heißen:

„Der verantwortliche Pilot hat sicherzustellen, dass ausreichende Mittel zur Navigation und Landung am Bestimmungsflugplatz oder an einem Bestimmungsausweichflugplatz zur Verfügung stehen, falls die Fähigkeit zur Nutzung des beabsichtigten Anflug- und Landeverfahrens verloren geht.“

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5094 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5094

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic or modacrylic 
  stable fibers, carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2008

  Mr. Coble introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic or modacrylic 
  stable fibers, carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACRYLIC OR MODACRYLIC STABLE FIBERS, CARDED, COMBED, OR 
              OTHERWISE PROCESSED FOR SPINNING.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.22 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to acrylic or modacrylic stable 
fibers, carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Tradestar Services, Inc. (the “small
        business issuer”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), I, Kenneth L. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of the small business
        issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of this Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the small business
        issuer.
 
 
 /s/
        Kenneth L. Thomas
 Kenneth
        L. Thomas
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 November
        13, 2006
STATE v. SIMON.

No. COA05-309.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (02CRS59428, 04CRS10278).

Case reported without published opinion. No error at trial; remanded for resentencing.
STATE v. VERRETT

No. COA04-1713

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Gaston (02CRS66696, 02CRS66716, 02CRS66717).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, William K. Aulet, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1. The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Viisage Technology, Inc.



Date: June 30, 2005/s/    WILLIAM K.
AULETWilliam K. Aulet Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report.