alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5281 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Hexanedioic acid, polymer with 1,2- 

ethanediol, 2-ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol and 1,3- 

isobenzofurandione, 2-propenoate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. FERGUSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Hexanedioic acid, polymer with 1,2-ethanediol, 2-ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3- 

propanediol and 1,3-isobenzofurandione, 2-propenoate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HEXANEDIOIC ACID, POLYMER WITH 1,2- 

4 ETHANEDIOL, 2-ETHYL-2-(HYDROXYMETHYL)- 

5 1,3-PROPANEDIOL AND 1,3- 

6 ISOBENZOFURANDIONE, 2-PROPENOATE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5281 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Hexanedioic acid, polymer 

with 1,2-ethanediol, 2-ethyl2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3- 

propanediol and 1,3- 

isobenzofurandione, 2- 

propenoate (CAS No. 77107– 

23–4) (provided for in subheading 3907.99.01) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

5 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT (32.2) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 27, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Cletus
Glasener, as Vice President, Controller and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: August 10, 2004/s/ Cletus Glasener
Cletus Glasener
Vice President, Controller and Treasurer
# L_2017091EN.01004002.xml

| 5.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 91/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 91/40

---

Corrigendum to Directive (EU) 2016/1919 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on legal aid for suspects and accused persons in criminal proceedings and for requested persons in European arrest warrant proceedings

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 297 of 4 November 2016
  )

On page 7, Article 10(1):

for:

‘
  25 May 2021
  ’,

read:

‘
  5 May 2021
  ’;

on page 7, Article 10(2):

for:

‘
  25 May 2022
  ’,

read:

‘
  5 May 2022
  ’;

on page 8, Article 12(1):

for:

‘
  25 May 2019
  ’,

read:

‘
  5 May 2019
  ’:

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Gary Lee BARNES.

No. 577P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Gary Lee Barnes, Pro Se.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*773*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th day of October 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Forsyth County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11



                             ACNIELSEN CORPORATION

               COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
                          ON A FULLY DILUTED BASIS(a)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA          1996            1995            1994
                                                           ----            ----            ----
                                                             (AVERAGE SHARE DATA IN THOUSANDS)

<S>                                                      <C>              <C>            <C>
Weighted average number of shares                         56,712           56,507         56,649
Dilutive effect of shares issuable as of
  year-end under stock option plans                          243                0              0
Adjustment of shares applicable to stock
  options and stock appreciation rights
  exercised during the year                                   27                0              0
                                                          ---------------------------------------
Weighted average number of shares 
  on a diluted basis                                      56,982           56,507          56,649
                                                          =======================================
                                                          ---------------------------------------
Net income                                                $ 15.8          $(230.9)         $(65.1)
                                                          =======================================
                                                          ---------------------------------------
Earnings per share of common stock
  on a fully diluted basis                                $ 0.28          $ (4.09)         $(1.15)
                                                          =======================================
                                                                          (b)              (b)

</TABLE>


(a) All periods prior to November 1, 1996 reflect the adjusted share and option
    activity of The Dun and Bradstreet Corporation
(b) No adjustment required as it would result in anti-dilution
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 40234]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14436]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  Tuesday, July 12, 2022 at 10:00 a.m. and its 
continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on July 14, 2022.

PLACE:  1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC and virtual (this meeting 
will be a hybrid meeting).

STATUS:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 
30109.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.
* * * * *

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Laura E. Sinram,
Acting Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-14436 Filed 7-1-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 6, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-20549 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FRANCISCO RANGEL-PEREZ, also known as Francisco Rangel, also known as Alberto Perez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:06-CR-17-ALL

-------------------- Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco RangelPerez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 10.1



 





Exhibit 10.1




COVERED SERVICES



Provider shall provide Employees the following examinations in accordance with the
frequency guidelines that have been approved by the Medical Advisory Board of the Provider.
These guidelines may vary according to the specific medical requirements and history of
each Employee:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Ages 21-39	 	Ages 40 – 49	 	Ages 50+
	Periodic Physical Exam
	 	Annually
	 	Annually
	 	Annually
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Colonoscopy
	 	 	 	Baseline
	 	As Medically Indicated
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Cardiac Stress Test
	 	 	 	Every 3 Years
	 	Every 2 Years
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Mammography
	 	 	 	Annually
	 	Annually
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Chest X-Ray	 	When medically indicated for current smokers and those patients that have smoked regularly within the last 10 years, or if medically indicated for other reasons.

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Vascular Screenings
	 	 	 	 	 	Every 2 Years
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Frontier Staffing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report'), Frederick A. Huttner, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                  /s/ Frederick A. Huttner
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Frederick A. Huttner,
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

Dated: AUGUST 19, 2005
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

toxoo Boor6 oi cNropootir &ouJ4or$ 

Littl~ri.14 BullU8g 

Auoti8, touo 

Attoatloar HF. Poul L. ltyero 

tho 0880 I8 a f.ke’ 

, the Boor 6 IO l uth o r - 

rorokoc o, a c eor l 

0014 llceaoo. 

met3 r0n •PP~ICOctto *a4 your CoQueot for on 

totlo copy of 8 dipiaformtion and aondlequlr.6, be coaolQred 

l st th o tt he l pplicont 

oaolbrr~ the mgaltuds or tho 

o hooltb oad oonoidosing the chiroother Tess8 laro, 10 the Chiropractic BOOM r o Quua # l urf1010lPc lnrormot10a la 1to 

l pplio~tloa for permlooion to toko t&8 l xallmotiono? 

%aeotioar Should aa l llooat be admitted to 

the l umlnatloo upoa apseova Pg ot oa l ppllo~tlab l uoh 

08 the obwo, and it lotor bo found tht hlo diploma 

use obtolaod thro 

"f* 

troti, or thot eon lo 0 fake, 

uo uld lt b e pooo lb l uador the Ohiropra6tlo SAU to 

ouopead or oenael hlo llcraoet” 
touo moord ot chlropuotlo Boui8oro, 

uo ilrot oall mar 0ttont1oa 

0111 80, VhlOh GOdO 00 t~ilov0l 

vhoaomarha1nos paEt l uoo8u t9uy 

pow08 ant~loaob poroaobollbvo l woeoofully 

pmoood 0 vritton 

~i606 tbrt tho 

oxomlut1m givr by tho &or& 

oumlMt1am 0s lloonoee afd.8 

thh Aot -11 Lorlda a alttea l r8mlut108 ln 

phyololou, mot 

ohonlo8ry, and PO 

l ello~o vhoro 

eqlrl~tode 

pa88ltloorrr of Doatoiao and SIP 

pouidoa those vho OF. gmdwto OK 

7 in this &at.; 

ropu8nblo ehlropootlo 

oprostoro of 0 

8oUogo v&a are l otlvol~ 

stotoo poouoo* 4iplomoo rrom 0 almpEwt10 

&hod ot Collo@e l g3roved by the Board my k 

pon8odo llwnoa sador th8 oaw l aa4ltla5o, opoa 

8hoi.r hono~oblo Uoohrgo from l uoh ormod fosooo 

afr rlthirr one (1) yam therooitcrr. ’ 

ouu 1 

(Uaderocor lag , 

Bill 

us nest 0011 youP l tto zltltw o seotloa la (3) ol Horuo 

20, vhlah prorldoo 00 tollovo~ 

*Bee. la. ?ha Bcord rim11 hors the l uth o r 1 ty 

to rovoko, oaneol, er ouopond tlao lloenoe, w nrw t0 fi~0tho l na0ti0a0 t0 uyoCpli0oa f0r 

the follouto(: us*-: 

. 

. . . . 
?eu0 Bwrd of aIlrograotlo rurlum ~~0~9 Y 

3. ib prooe*tat1w to tbo Boor4 Qo uoo of 

sa y llo o noo l utlr luto a diplaM, l&h ~00 lllo@lyo k?o~atly obttiao4, a if oay fmub 

u aoooptial us beon p?ootlood lo paooln# the oxamlnotiaq 

. a 

. . . . 

It lo tbo oplnloa ol this doportuat t&t uhore on 

l ppllooat takes tb m l hlroportlo l rmlsotlom o8d is loouo6 0 

llooao8 od lotor it lo founA that tho l pplloaat~r dlplao ~00 

obtolnod through troti, or oold dlplaao is a Irka the Baud 

is l uthorlood to rotoko, a~01 or l wpoM uld llomoo. 

We hors ouofully l uriae4 thw plnted fom of on 

l ppll$otlon to to& tho l hlro 

the oplnla 8hot oou lo r 

set18 axemlutloa and ore oi 

surf OlomtJ howovor oa l oeh l ppllootloa it I0 the &uty~of tbo Bo8r6 to ootlo~ Loelvoo t&t 

th o l pplioont aooto tho rye!somoato of 86otloa 8 of Borne Bill 

10 in 011 nopeeto. The Board mot ilac th o t he lppliooat~o 

dlplom, ii any, lo f?om an l aondlted collogo or oohool 81 

Qrovlded l8 o&l& Mt. 

You ore odvlso4 tbot a pbotootatlo oo y of a diploma 

lo l ufrlol~&t, proulded the diplou ~80 loouod g 

a d or l pprovo4 l ehool or oollogw. 

y UI oooredltYowoverytruly
STATE of North Carolina v. Juan Garcia GALVEZ.

No. 603P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Juan Garcia Galvez, Pro Se.

Anne M. Middleton, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 24th day of October 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Wake County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
IN RE K.E.

No. COA05-196.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from New Hanover (00J181).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Appeal reinstated and Order filed January 4 , 202 2

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 2 1

- 0 0 452

- CV

____________ ZHILI “JENNY” ZHAO , Appellant

V.

YUE “MARK” WANG , Appellee

On Appeal from the 29 5th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2 019

- 49317

O RDER
This appeal was abated to allow the parties to mediate their dispute. As no dispositive motion has been filed in this case, the court hereby REINSTATES this appeal and directs appellee to file hi s brief within 21 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Zimmerer and Wilson.
Exhibit
      32.2




**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of DAIRY FRESH FARMS INC. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ian Morrice,
      Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By
            /s/Ian MorriceIan
                MorriceChief
                Financial Officer and Principal
              Accounting
                Officer




Date:
      August 19, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5395 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5395

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``William `Bill' 
                      Clay Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mr. Carnahan (for himself, Mr. Clay, Mr. Costello, Mrs. Emerson, Mr. 
Skelton, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Rush, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Thompson of 
 Mississippi, Ms. Waters, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. 
Payne, Mr. Akin, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Ms. Solis, Mr. Becerra, Mr. 
 Bishop of Georgia, and Mr. Lewis of Georgia) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``William `Bill' 
                      Clay Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILLIAM ``BILL'' CLAY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``William `Bill' Clay Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William 
`Bill' Clay Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. Adam Chavez MENDOZA.

No. 327P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of June 2005 by Defendant for "Petition for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of June 2005."
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZHONGPIN INC. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Yuanmei Ma, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.


Date:   September 18, 2006                By:/s/ Yuanmei Ma
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Yuanmei Ma
                                             Chief Financial Officer



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

        This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2016282DE.01008402.xml

| 19.10.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 282/84 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 282/84

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2016/1768 der Kommission vom 4. Oktober 2016 zur Zulassung von Guanidinoessigsäure als Zusatzstoff in Futtermitteln für Masthühner, Absetzferkel und Mastschweine sowie zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 904/2009

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 270 vom 5. Oktober 2016
  )

Seite 5, Artikel 3 Absatz 2:

Anstatt:

„2.   Einzel- und Mischfuttermittel, die den in Absatz 1 beschriebenen Stoff enthalten, dürfen gemäß den Bestimmungen, die vor dem 25. Oktober 2017 galten, bis zum 25. Oktober 2016 in Verkehr gebracht und bis zur Erschöpfung der Bestände verwendet werden.“

muss es heißen:

„2.   Einzel- und Mischfuttermittel, die den in Absatz 1 beschriebenen Stoff enthalten, dürfen gemäß den Bestimmungen, die vor dem 25. Oktober 2016 galten, bis zum 25. Oktober 2017 in Verkehr gebracht und bis zur Erschöpfung der Bestände verwendet werden.“

---
96 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Raytheon Technologies $88.0 M

SEACORP $69.3 M

Rite-Solutions $43.5 M

McLaughlin Research Corp. $37.9 M

Northrop Grumman $29.2 M

Mikel, Inc. $24.1 M

Leidos $18.3 M

SAIC $16.0 M

Network and Simulation Technologies $15.3 M

PURVIS Systems, Inc. $11.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

RHODE ISLAND

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$916.0 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,992

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Newport 2,642 4,756 131 918 8,447

Kent 48 61 1,402 ND ND

Washington ND 288 1,173 50 ND

Providence 91 209 389 243 932

Bristol ND ND 0 0 ND

Construction: 5% Research and

Development: 22%

Service: 49%

Supplies and

Equipment: 23%

Active Duty: 26%

Civilian: 41%

National 

Guard: 24%

Reserve: 9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

3%

90%

1%

6%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

66%

10%

2%

$0.5

$0.6

$0.5 $0.5

$0.6

$0.7 $0.7 $0.7

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#40 #17 0.3% $1,497 #40 #43 #40 #35

$1.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.3% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,992 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$62.1 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 97

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

RHODE ISLAND FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Newport

Providence

Washington

Kent

Bristol

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$586.7 M

$37.4 M

$15.1 M

$14.9 M

$5.5 M

Newport

Washington

Kent

Providence

Bristol

$753.0 M

$54.6 M

$51.5 M

$40.9 M

$431.3 K

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Newport

Washington

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Newport

Washington