alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>


                                                                                                                EXHIBIT 11
                                                  ACNIELSEN CORPORATION

                                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
                                                  ON A DILUTED BASIS (a)



Dollar Amounts in Millions, Except Per Share Data                                        1997           1996           1995
<CAPTION>
                                                                                         (Average share data in thousands)
<S>                                                                                   <C>             <C>           <C>
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding                                  57,139          56,712        56,507
Dilutive effect of shares issuable as of year-end under stock option plans               976             243             0
Adjustment of shares applicable to stock options and stock appreciation
   rights exercised during the year                                                      254              27             0
                                                                               ============== =============== =============
Weighted average number of shares on a diluted basis                                  58,369          56,982        56,507
                                                                               ============== =============== =============

                                                                               ============== =============== =============
Net Income (Loss)                                                                      $35.9           $15.8    ($  230.9)
                                                                               ============== =============== =============

                                                                               ============== =============== =============
Earnings (loss) per share of common stock on a diluted basis                            $.62            $.28       ($4.09)
                                                                               ============== =============== =============
                                                                                                                  (b)
<FN>
(a) All periods prior to November 1, 1996 reflect the adjusted  share and option
    activity of The Dun and Bradstreet  Corporation 
(b) No adjustment required as it would result in anti-dilution
 </FN>
</TABLE>
II 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5472 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2008 

Received 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2650 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Street, 

Indianapolis, Indiana, as the ‘‘Julia M. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

HR 5472 RDS 

1 SECTION 1. JULIA M. CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2650 Dr. Martin Luther King 

4 Jr. Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Julia M. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Julia M. Carson Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 9, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5366 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5366

  To suspend temporarily the duty on ground fault circuit interrupter 
                    receptacles of 15 amps or less.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mr. Ackerman introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on ground fault circuit interrupter 
                    receptacles of 15 amps or less.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER RECEPTACLES OF 15 
              AMPS OR LESS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.85.30       Ground fault        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          circuit                                                            31/2011.......
                          interrupter
                          receptacles of 15
                          amps or less
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8536.30.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                           MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                          (000s, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       FOR THE YEAR ENDED
                                                       DECEMBER 31, 2000
                                                       ------------------
<S>                                                   <C>
Net income                                                  $8,878

Weighted average number of outstanding shares of
     common stock                                            8,452

Basic earnings per share                                    $ 1.05
                                                            ======



Net income                                                  $8,878

Weighted average number of outstanding shares of
     common stock                                            8,452
Dilutive stock options                                          40
                                                            ------
                                                             8,492

Earnings per share assuming dilution                        $ 1.05
                                                            ======

</TABLE>
STATE v. Haseen Herman EVERETTE.

No. 452P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 22, 2005.

Richard E. Jester, for Everette.

Clarke Everett, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th day of August 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of August 2005."
STATE v. CAMERON.

No. COA05-415.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS58293)

Case without published opinion. No error.
Steven HULTQUIST and Debra Hultquist v. Dr. Leslie MORROW, Dr. Michael Lish and David Daniel Construction Company.

No. 215P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Steven Hultquist, Research Triangle Park, for Steven & Debra Hultquist.

Nicholas P. Robinson, for Morrow, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of April 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
Exhibit 99.1



             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






Board of Directors
SE Financial Corp.

We have  reviewed the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet of SE Financial
Corp.  and  subsidiary  as of  April  30,  2005,  and the  related  consolidated
statements of income for the three-month  and six-month  periods ended April 30,
2005 and 2004, and the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity
for the six-month period ended April 30, 2005, and the consolidated statement of
cash  flows for the  six-month  periods  ended  April 30,  2005 and 2004.  These
consolidated  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of the  Company's
management.

We conducted  our review in  accordance  with  standards  of the Public  Company
Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States).  A review of  interim  financial
information consists principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with the  standards  of the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board,  the
objective  of which is the  expression  of an opinion  regarding  the  financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with U.S generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in  accordance  with the  standards of the Public
Company  Accounting  Oversight Board (United States),  the consolidated  balance
sheet as of October 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes  in  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented  herein);  and in our report  dated  December 3, 2004 we  expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



/s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
May 10, 2005
STATE v. THAI.

No. COA05-347.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (02CRS207578)

Case without published opinion. No Prejudicial Error at Trial; Remanded for Resentencing; Claim of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Dismissed without Prejudice.
# L_2016155EN.01001001.xml

| 14.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 155/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 155/10

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/932

of 1 June 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Zagorski puran (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Zagorski puran’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Zagorski puran’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Zagorski puran’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Zagorski puran’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Zagorski puran’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 June 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 60, 16.2.2016, p. 13.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT OF


TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION





I, Scott Cooke, certify that:





(a) A review of Toyota Motor Credit Corporation’s activities
      and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of May 16, 2018 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”), among Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as seller, Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as servicer (in such capacity, the
      “Servicer”) and sponsor, and Toyota Auto Receivables 2018-B Owner Trust, as issuer, year ended 2019





(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the
      Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.





March 27, 2020





By:  /s/ Scott Cooke


Scott Cooke


Group Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Toyota Motor Credit Corporation, as Servicer of Toyota Auto Receivables 2018-B Owner Trust
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5215 

To suspend temporarily the duty on coupling assembly with 2 steel hubs 

with 32 millimeter outside diameter, 18 millimeter inside diameter, and 

a white plastic sleeve with 46 millimeter outside diameter and 28 millimeter width. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on coupling assembly with 

2 steel hubs with 32 millimeter outside diameter, 18 

millimeter inside diameter, and a white plastic sleeve 

with 46 millimeter outside diameter and 28 millimeter 

width. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HR 5215 IH 

1 SECTION 1. COUPLING ASSEMBLY WITH 2 STEEL HUBS 

2 WITH 32 MILLIMETER OUTSIDE DIAMETER, 18 

3 MILLIMETER INSIDE DIAMETER, AND A 

4 WHITE PLASTIC SLEEVE WITH 46 MILLI5 METER OUTSIDE DIAMETER AND 28 MILLI6 METER WIDTH. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

9 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

10 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Coupling assembly with 2 

steel hubs with 32 millimeter 

outside diameter, 18 millimeter inside diameter, and a 

white plastic sleeve with 46 

millimeter outside diameter 

and 28 millimeter width (provided for in subheading 

8483.90.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

13 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

14 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
# L_2016327EN.01001801.xml

| 2.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 327/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 327/18

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/2104

of 21 November 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Vale of Evesham Asparagus (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘Vale of Evesham Asparagus’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, the United Kingdom's application to register the name ‘Vale of Evesham Asparagus’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Vale of Evesham Asparagus’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Vale of Evesham Asparagus’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Vale of Evesham Asparagus’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 November 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 257, 15.7.2016, p. 16.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
**EXHIBIT
32**
 
 
 
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Bancshares, Inc. **** (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, Tracy R. Newton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Darren M. Cantlay, Chief Financial Officer, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:
 
 (1)
    The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
    The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 By:/s/
      Tracy R. NewtonTracy
      R. NewtonPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerMarch
      29, 2005/s/
      Darren M. CantlayDarren
      M. CantlayChief
      Financial OfficerMarch
      29, 2005
STATE v. MURPHY

No. COA05-145

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Rockingham (04CRS50356).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

Navigant Consulting, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-81680, 333-30267, 333-103405, 333-127988 and 333-135022) of Navigant Consulting, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our reports dated March 1, 2007 relating to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Navigant Consulting, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholder’s equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period endedDecember 31, 2006, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Navigant Consulting, Inc. 

Ourreport dated March 1, 2007, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, expresses our opinion thatNavigant Consulting, Inc. and subsidiaries did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 because of the effect of a material weakness on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria andcontains an explanatory paragraph that states that at December 31, 2006, the Company did not have effective policies and procedures in place to fully consider the impact of control deficiencies on the Company’s prior accounting for relevantnon-routine transactions that had a continuing impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As a result, upon the identification of a deficiency in internal control over business combinations during 2006, the Company failed toconsider the impact of this deficiency on its accounting for previous business combinations that were structured in a similar manner. This material weakness resulted in material misstatements in the Company’s 2006 preliminary consolidatedfinancial statements. 

Our report relating to the consolidated financial statements states that the Company changed its method of accounting forshare-based compensation awards as of January 1, 2006, and its method for quantifying errors in 2006. 

 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 1, 2007
STATE v. HUFFMAN

No. COA05-349

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS50017).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
David Noble WATTS, Employee v. BORG WARNER AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Employer, Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Carrier.

No. 359A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 613 S.E.2d 715 (2005), remanding for further findings of fact an opinion and award filed 4 March 2004 by the North Carolina Industrial Commission. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 December 2005.

Law Office of David Gantt, by David Gantt, Asheville, for plaintiff-appellee.

Hedrick Eatman Gardner & Kincheloe, LLP, by Hope F. Smelcer and J.A. Gardner, III, Charlotte, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.