alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5479 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 847
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5479

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 24, 2008

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             June 25, 2008

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 117 North Kidd Street in Ionia, Michigan, as the ``Alonzo Woodruff 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALONZO WOODRUFF POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 117 North Kidd Street in Ionia, Michigan, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Alonzo Woodruff Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Alonzo 
Woodruff Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 847

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5479

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 117 North Kidd Street in Ionia, Michigan, as the ``Alonzo Woodruff 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 25, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
# Official Journal C 198/12 A

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 198 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4812 August 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 198

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4812 August 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2005/C 198/1 | Council and Commission Action Plan implementing the Hague Programme on strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2005/C 198/1

Council and Commission Action Plan implementing the Hague Programme on strengthening freedom, security and justice in the European Union

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5135 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 693
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5135

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2008

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                             April 10, 2008

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, as the ``Sergeant Jamie 
                   O. Maugans Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT JAMIE O. MAUGANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Jamie O. Maugans Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Jamie O. Maugans Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 693

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5135

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, as the ``Sergeant Jamie 
                   O. Maugans Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 10, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COAST DENTAL SERVICES, INC. FOR THE 6 MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      37,616,584
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,357,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,659,910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,327,966
<PP&E>                                      13,213,108
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,734,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              67,608,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,528,606
<BONDS>                                      1,330,685  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,622
<OTHER-SE>                                  62,741,955
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                67,608,868
<SALES>                                     15,360,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,360,487
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,611,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,056
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,953,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                   981,202 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,972,460  
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      633,813
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,338,647
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>   5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                  10,101,950
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        10,342,754
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          10,342,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      358,678
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    61,597
<OTHER-SE>                               9,922,479
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            10,342,754
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (622,333)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (3,432,224)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        622,333
<DISCONTINUED>                          (4,054,557)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (3,432,224)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         Listed below, as of October 31, 2003, are the significant subsidiaries
of the Company and their jurisdictions of organization. All of such subsidiaries
are either directly or indirectly wholly owned by the Company. Other
subsidiaries of the Company have been omitted because, considered in the
aggregate, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Jurisdiction of
Name of Subsidiary                            Organization
------------------                            ------------
<S>                                         <C>
100% Owned

CUNO Europe S.A.                            France
CUNO Pacific, Pty. Ltd.                     Australia
CUNO Filtration Asia Pte. Ltd.              Singapore
CUNO K.K.                                   Japan
CUNO Latina Ltda                            Brazil
CUNO SarL                                   Italy
CUNO GmbH                                   Germany
CUNO Ltd.                                   United Kingdom
CUNO Filtration System Shanghai
      Company                               China
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                                                                                                       |  |                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|Subsidiaries  Direct/Wholly-owned                                                                                     |  | State of Incorporation        
|Appalachian Capital Trust I                                                                                            |  | Delaware                      
|                                                                                                                       | 
|Appalachian Community BankAlso doing business under the registered trade names Gilmer County Bank and Banco Fuerza |  | Georgia                       
|                                                                                                                       | 
|Appalachian Community Bank, FSB                                                                                        |  | United States (thrift charter)
|                                                                                                                       | 
|Subsidiaries  Indirect/wholly-owned by Appalachian Community Bank                                                     |  |                               
|Appalachian Information Management, Inc.                                                                               |  | Georgia
**EXHIBIT32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Gregory A.Wells, Chief Financial Officer of NTS Realty Capital, Inc., the managinggeneral partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

1.                                       Thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30,2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date:   November 7, 2006                         | * * |
|------------------------------------------------------------|----------|
|                                                       | * * |
|                                                       | * * |
| */s/ Gregory A. Wells*                                     | * * |
| Chief Financial  Officer of                                |     |
| NTS Realty  Capital, Inc., the Managing General Partner of |     |
| NTS Realty  Holdings Limited Partnership                   |     |

 

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

37

----
STATE v. JONES.

No. COA05-739.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Buncombe (99CRS4926).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         Listed below, as of October 31, 1998, are the significant subsidiaries
of the Company and their jurisdictions of organization. All of such subsidiaries
are either directly or indirectly wholly owned by the Company. Other
subsidiaries of the Company have been omitted because, considered in the
aggregate, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Jurisdiction of
Name of Subsidiary                         Organization 
<S>                                       <C>
100% Owned

CUNO Europe S.A.                            France
CUNO Pacific, Pty. Ltd.                     Australia
CUNO Filtration Asia Pte. Ltd.              Singapore
CUNO K.K.                                   Japan
CUNO Latina Ltda                            Brazil
CUNO SarL                                   Italy
CUNO GmbH                                   Germany
CUNO Ltd.                                   United Kingdom
Chemical Engineering Corporation            Indiana
Flot, S.A.                                  France
</TABLE>

                                       18
STATE of North Carolina v. Antionne Lemel LYLES.

No. 442A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Kelly D. Miller, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Antoine L. Lyles.

Tina Lloyd Hlabse, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 18th day of August 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-28,195-06

EX PARTE FRED S. MUNOZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 13-298-A IN THE 130TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MATAGORDA COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a

building and sentenced to twenty months’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, among otherthings,that hispleawasinvoluntarybecause counsel falsely

informed Applicant that the State had a DNA blood test linking him to the burglary. Applicant

contends there was no such evidence, and that counsel used this tactic to coerce Applicant into

pleading guilty. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294
2

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and

involuntary plea. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07,

§ 3(d). 

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

 The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant’s

claim that his plea was involuntary. The trial court shall make findings as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall

be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: January 28, 2015

Do not publish
MW CLEARING & GRADING, INC. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT and Natural Resources, Division of Air Quality.

No. 432A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Allen C. Brotherton, Charlotte, for MW Clearing & Grading.

Elizabeth J. Weese, Assistant Attorney General, for NCDENR.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Petitioner on the 11th day of August 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."

Petitioner shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Petitioner's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
John DOE, et al. v. STATE of NC.

No. 95P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of September 2005 by Plaintiff for "Petition for Notice to Hear Appeal As To Time Is Ripe To Do So":

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of January 2006."
# L_2017156EN.01002401.xml

| 20.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 156/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 156/24

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2017/1087

of 19 June 2017

amending Decision 2014/386/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 23 June 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/386/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 23 June 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/386/CFSP (1).

| (2) | The Council does not recognise and continues to condemn the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol by the Russian Federation and will remain committed to fully implement its non-recognition policy. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Council does not recognise and continues to condemn the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol by the Russian Federation and will remain committed to fully implement its non-recognition policy.

| (3) | On the basis of a review of Decision 2014/386/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 23 June 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of a review of Decision 2014/386/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 23 June 2018.

| (4) | Decision 2014/386/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2014/386/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The second paragraph of Article 5 of Decision 2014/386/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘This Decision shall apply until 23 June 2018.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 19 June 2017.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/386/CFSP of 23 June 2014 concerning restrictive measures in response to the illegal annexation of Crimea and Sevastopol (OJ L 183, 24.6.2014, p. 70).

1

---