alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5399 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5399

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain travel bags with a removable 
                          backpack or daypack.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

   Mr. Issa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain travel bags with a removable 
                          backpack or daypack.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN TRAVEL BAGS WITH A REMOVABLE BACKPACK OR DAYPACK.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Travel bags of      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          manmade fibers,                                                    31/2011.......
                          with wheels, a
                          telescoping
                          handle, stowable
                          shoulder straps,
                          and a removable
                          separate backpack
                          or daypack
                          attached by
                          zipper or other
                          means, valued
                          over $30, not to
                          exceed 4,900
                          cubic inches (80
                          liters) in
                          volume, and
                          removable
                          separate backpack
                          or daypack not to
                          exceed 1,600
                          cubic inches (26
                          liters) in volume
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          4202.12.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ November 14 , 2013 ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2013 - 3045 DAVID NOBLE, JR., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent. De cided: September 18, 201 3 Nonp recedential Opinion

______________________ Please make the following change s: Page 3 , line s 26 - 27 , change “ granted his request to try to lit i gate it ” to -- treated the argument -- . Page 7, line 19, change “prior declaration addressing the issue ” to -- declaration recounting his pre - hearing exper ience with and research into constructive - suspension claims -- .
Exhibit 32.1













CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Energy, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley Chan, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  May 13, 2011





|                                                              |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Stanley Chan                                              |  | 
|Stanley Chan                                                  |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer           |  | 
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |  |
EXHIBIT 24 

                              POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOW  ALL MEN BY THESE  PRESENTS,  that  each  person  whose  signature
appears below  constitutes  and appoints  Robert J. Chrenc,  Earl H. Doppelt and
Ellenore  O'Hanrahan,  and  each  of  them,  as  his  or  her  true  and  lawful
attorneys-in-fact   and   agents,   with   full   power  of   substitution   and
resubstitution,  for him or her and in his or her name,  place and stead, in any
and all  capacities,  to sign the name of such person in the capacity  indicated
below  opposite the name of such person to the Annual Report for the fiscal year
ended  December 31, 1997 of ACNielsen  Corporation  on Form 10-K and any and all
amendments  thereto and to file the same with all  exhibits  thereto,  and other
documents in connection therewith,  with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them, full power
and  authority  to do and  perform  each and every act and thing  requisite  and
necessary  to be done in and about the  premises,  as fully to all  intents  and
purposes  as he or she  might  or  could  do in  person,  hereby  ratifying  and
confirming all that said  attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their
or his or her substitute or substitutes,  may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

         This Power of Attorney has been signed by the following  persons in the
capacities indicated on February 19, 1998.



              Name                                                   Title


     /s/ Robert H. Beeby                                             Director
-------------------------------
         Robert H. Beeby



    /s/ Michael P. Connors                                            Director
-------------------------------
        Michael P. Connors



    /s/ Donald W. Griffin                                             Director
-------------------------------
        Donald W. Griffin



    /s/ Thomas C. Hays                                                Director
-------------------------------
        Thomas C. Hays



     /s/ Karen L. Hendricks                                           Director
-------------------------------
         Karen L. Hendricks



     /s/ Robert M. Hendrickson                                        Director
-------------------------------
         Robert M. Hendrickson



     /s/ Robert Holland, Jr.                                          Director
-------------------------------
         Robert Holland, Jr.



     /s/ Robert J Lievense                                            Director
-------------------------------
         Robert J Lievense



     /s/ John R. Meyer                                                Director
-------------------------------
         John R. Meyer



     /s/ Brian B. Pemberton                                           Director
-------------------------------
         Brian B. Pemberton


     /s/ Robert N. Thurston                                           Director
-------------------------------
         Robert N. Thurston
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Robinson, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 177]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph S. Forma, *1277J.), rendered December 17, 2002. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of burglary in the first degree, rape in the first degree and attempted robbery in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of burglary in the first degree (Penal Law § 140.30 [2]), rape in the first degree (§ 130.35 [1]), and attempted robbery in the second degree (§§ 110.00, 160.10 [2] [a]). As defendant concedes, he failed to preserve for our review his contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish that he caused physical injury to the victim (see *People v Finger,*95 NY2d 894, 895 [2000]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). In any event, that contention lacks merit *(see*Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; *People v Black,*304 AD2d 905, 908 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 578 [2003]; *People v Brown,*243 AD2d 749 [1997]; *People v Jackson,*169 AD2d 887, 889-890 [1991], *lv denied*77 NY2d 996 [1991]; see *also People v Slater,*13 AD3d 732, 734 [2004], *lv denied*4 NY3d 803 [2005]). We reject the further contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that “the evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [this] case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that [trial counsel] provided meaningful representation” to defendant *(People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; *see People v Laraby,*4 AD3d 749, 750 [2004], *lv denied*2 NY3d 802 [2004]). Finally, contrary to defendant’s contention, the sentence is not illegal, nor is it unduly harsh or severe. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Pine, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of SeaChange International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William C. Styslinger, III, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ WILLIAM C. STYSLINGER, III                                        
|William C. Styslinger, III                                            
|President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director

October 19, 2007

This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission with this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act,
be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5395 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St. Louis, Missouri, 

as the ‘‘William ‘Bill’ Clay Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5395 EH

1 SECTION 1. WILLIAM ‘‘BILL’’ CLAY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St. 

4 Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘William ‘Bill’ Clay Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘William ‘Bill’ Clay 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 9, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5395 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘William ‘Bill’ Clay Post al Service located at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St.
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3120

___________________________ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee ,

v. Devonte Demario Colbert, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
.

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________ Submitted: May 11, 2020 Filed: May 14, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Devonte Demario Colbert appeals the sentence imposed by the district court 1 after he pleaded guilty to a drug offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and

1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the

substantive reasonableness of the sentence. Upon careful review under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard, see Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007), we conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence. The court properly considered the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and there is no indication that the court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster , 572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). Finally, we have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment.

______________________________

-2-
Order entered March 18, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00388

- CR

CARL RAY WOOD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Ca use No. F12

- 54553

- Y



### O RDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s March 14, 2014 motion to extend time to file his brief.

We ORDER appellant’s brief received on March 14, 2014 filed as of the date of this order.

We GRANT appellant’s March 14, 2014 motion to supple ment the record. We ORDER
the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental record containing the State’s February 13, 2013 “Notice of the State’s Intent to Enhance Punishment Range.”

We DIRECT the Cle rk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal
Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Fresenius Medical Care Aktiengesellschaft
Hof an der Saale, Germany:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
on Form S-8 of Fresenius Medical Care Aktiengesellschaft relating to relating to
the Fresenius Medical Care AG 1998 Stock Incentive Plan (the "Form S-8") of our
report dated March 5, 2002 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Fresenius Medical Care Aktiengesellschaft and its subsidiaries as of December
31, 2001 and 2000, and related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows
and shareholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2001, and the related financial statement schedules, which report
appears in the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Fresenius Medical Care
Aktiengesellschaft for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, filed on April
3, 2002 with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Frankfurt am Main, Germany
April 9, 2002
/s/ KPMG
Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 129 (Thursday, July 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 40533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14447]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than August 8, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Holly A. Rieser, Senior 
Manager) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034, or 
electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8fbd7d5d5ddd6cccb96d9c8c8d4d1dbd9ccd1d7d6cbf8cbccd4cb96decada96d7cadf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d7e5250505853494e135c4d4d51545e5c495452534e7d4e49514e135b4f5f13524f5a">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. First Waterloo Bancshares, Inc., Waterloo, Illinois; to merge 
with Village Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire The 
Village Bank, both of Saint Libory, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-14447 Filed 7-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE of North Carolina v. Stanley Lorenzo WILLIAMS.

No. 507P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Haakon Thorsen, Charlotte, for Stanley Lorenzo Williams.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 6th day of September 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
FILED

July 2, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

FEBRUARY 1998 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE )

) NO. 01C01-9703-CR-00094

Appellee )

) PICKETT COUNTY

v. )

) HON. JOHN A. TURNBULL

DAVID L. HATHAWAY )

) (D.U.I.)

Appellant. )

)

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur in the result reached by Judge Barker in his thorough opinion.

Having concurred with Judge Wade in his opinion in State v. Jerry Wayne Edison, No.

03C01-9605-CC-00199 (Tenn. Crim. App., Knoxville, June 18, 1997) that an abuse of

discretion standard applies to this court’s review of the trial court’s ruling on the

admissibility of intoximeter results, I write separately to indicate that I favor the Edison

standard of review as opposed to the standard of preponderance of the evidence to which

Judge Barker adheres in this case. I agree that the trial court’s decision would be

affirmed under either standard of review.

_________________________

CURWOOD WITT
EX-10.D


		
			Exhibit 10(d)
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			AMENDMENT NO. 2
		

		
			TO THE
		

		
			ONCOR SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN
		

		
			(Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2015)
		

		
			Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC hereby adopts this Amendment No. 2 to the Oncor Supplemental Retirement Plan (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2015) (the “Plan”) effective as of May 13, 2019 to provide for cashouts of amounts under the limits imposed by Section 402(g) of the Internal Revenue Code, as permitted by Treasury Regulation 1.409A-3(j)(4)(v). Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters that are defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.
		

		
			1.    Article Four of the Plan is hereby amended by revising Section 4.2(c) to read as follows:
		

		
			“(c)    Notwithstanding subsection (b), effective as of May 13, 2019 (the “Cashout Amendment Date”): (i) with respect to any Participant who experiences a Separation from Service on or after the Cashout Amendment Date, if the lump sum present value of such Participant’s entire vested Supplemental Retirement Benefit under the Plan as of the Participant’s Separation from Service date is no greater than the applicable dollar amount under section 402(g)(1)(B) of the Code, the present value of such Participant’s Supplemental Retirement Benefit shall be paid to such Participant in a single lump sum as soon as reasonably practical following such Participant’s Separation from Service and, in any event, within ninety (90) days thereof; and (ii) with respect to any Participant who experienced a Separation from Service prior to the Cashout Amendment Date, if the lump sum present value of such Participant’s entire vested Supplemental Retirement Benefit under the Plan as of the Cashout Amendment Date is no greater than the applicable dollar amount under section 402(g)(1)(B) of the Code, the present value of such Participant’s Supplemental Retirement Benefit as of the Cashout Amendment Date shall be paid to such Participant in a single lump sum as soon as administratively practical following the Cashout Amendment Date and, in any event, within ninety (90) days thereof.”
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			2.    Except as expressly set forth herein, the Plan shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.
		

		
			Executed this 13th day of May, 2019, to be effective as set forth herein.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
					
						ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY COMPANY LLC

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						By: /s/ Debbie L. Dennis

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						Printed Name: Debbie L. Dennis

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						Title: CCO & SVP HR and Corporate Affairs

				



		
			﻿