alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2017012EN.01009001.xml

| 17.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 12/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 12/90

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2017/82

of 16 January 2017

amending Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 31(2) thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 of 27 May 2016 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea and repealing Decision 2013/183/CFSP (1), and in particular Article 33 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 27 May 2016 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/849. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 27 May 2016 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/849.

| (2) | On 17 December 2016 the United Nations Security Council Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 (2006) deleted the names of five vessels from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 17 December 2016 the United Nations Security Council Committee established pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 (2006) deleted the names of five vessels from the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures.

| (3) | Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 16 January 2017.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 141, 28.5.2016, p. 79.

1

---

ANNEX

The vessels with the IMO numbers listed below are deleted from the list set out in entry 20 of part B (Entities) of Annex I to Decision (CFSP) 2016/849:

| (d) | Dawnlight 9110236 |
| --- | --- |

(d)

Dawnlight 9110236

| (e) | Ever Bright 88 (J Star) 8914934 |
| --- | --- |

(e)

Ever Bright 88 (J Star) 8914934

| (f) | Gold Star 3 (benevolence) 8405402 |
| --- | --- |

(f)

Gold Star 3 (benevolence) 8405402

| (o) | Orion Star (Richocean) 9333589 |
| --- | --- |

(o)

Orion Star (Richocean) 9333589

| (w) | South Hill 5 9138680 |
| --- | --- |

(w)

South Hill 5 9138680

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Frank M. Semple, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures****andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: October 20,  2005 | By:    |   /s/ FRANK M. SEMPLE     |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                         |   |   Frank M. Semple         |
|                         |   |   Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **Global Green Solutions Inc.** (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, **Arnold Hughes**, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 16th day of October, 2006.

 
ARNOLD HUGHES 
Arnold Hughes 
Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. PAINTER

No. COA04-896.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from McDowell (01CRS52387, 01CRS52389, 02CRS2020, 03CRS1091, 03CRS1092).

Case reported without published opinion. No error at trial; remanded for resentencing.
STATE v. BARNES.

No. COA05-930.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Pitt (04CRS8482).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
22 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Raytheon Technologies $8.2 B

Northrop Grumman $855.3 M

Honeywell $642.7 M

Boeing $584.9 M

General Dynamics $393.1 M

Nammo $119.8 M

Jacobs $112.6 M

Trax International $103.6 M

Iridium Communications, Inc. $86.1 M

Airborne Tactical Advantage Co., LLC $53.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

ARIZONA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.3 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

41,502

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Maricopa 4,862 2,387 3,799 4,985 16,033

Pima 6,177 2,770 2,434 1,588 12,969

Cochise 2,986 2,547 117 182 5,832

Yuma 3,164 1,285 49 36 4,534

Pinal ND 134 518 456 ND

Coconino 17 39 405 ND ND

Yavapai 20 ND 175 0 ND

Navajo ND ND 31 0 ND

Graham 0 0 32 0 32

Mohave ND ND 0 0 ND

Construction: 1% Research and 

Development: 13%

Service: 16%

Supplies and

Equipment: 70%

Active Duty: 42%

Civilian: 22%

National 

Guard: 18%

Reserve: 17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

31%

26%

21%

21%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

37%

14%

45%

4%

$5.3

$7.5

$10.0 $11.8

$17.3

$8.9

$12.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#10 #12 2.7% $2,033 #10 #21 #19 #20

$15.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

3.3% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$12.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

41,502 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$131.2 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$10.7
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 23

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Navajo

Mohave

Yavapai

Maricopa

Graham Yuma Pinal

Pima

Cochise

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

La Paz

Greenlee

Cochise

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ARIZONA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Pima

Maricopa

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Coconino

Greenlee

Yavapai

La Paz

Mohave

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$8.6 B

$3.1 B

$669.5 M

$239.5 M

$14.5 M

$10.2 M

$1.6 M

$1.2 M

$446.8 K

$254.5 K

Pima

Maricopa

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Coconino

Yavapai

Mohave

Navajo

Graham

$768.4 M

$739.4 M

$437.5 M

$246.7 M

$26.2 M

$12.5 M

$5.4 M

$845.2 K

$750.2 K

$494.1 K

Coconino

Y avapai

Mohave

Maricopa

Yuma Pinal

Pima

Coconino
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5503 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain engines for snowmobiles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2008 

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain engines for 

snowmobiles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ENGINES FOR SNOWMOBILES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l Spark-ignition reciprocating 

or rotary internal combustion 

piston engines to be installed 

in vehicles specifically designed for traveling on snow 

(provided for in subheading 

8407.34.18) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5503 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE v. THOMAS

No. COA05-1258

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Craven (04CRS52442).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ERIC GIAMBAGNO
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 20

- 1627

[ October 14, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Caroline Cahill Shepherd , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2018

- CF

- 001666

- AXXX

- MB

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender and David John McPherrin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bett endorf, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

L EVINE
, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Bobby Joe Jones, Jr. v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 358

- CR

Trial court case number: CR

- 13

- 0430

Trial court: 2 2 nd District Court, Ha y s County, Texas

Appellant is represented by appointed counsel , Tanisa Jeffers

. Appellant’s counsel was notified of the filing of the clerk’s record on May 14, 2015. The reporter’s record was filed on July 25, 2015. Appellant’ s brief was due on August 5

, 201 5

. On August 14, 201 5 , the Clerk of the Court notified appellant ’s counsel that a brief had not yet been filed and required a response within 10 days. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(b)(2). On September 23, 2015, appointed counsel filed a letter, asking for another copy of the record, claiming her copy was lost. The record was sent to her on September 25, 2015. Counsel has filed no motions for extension of time to file the

brief.

Appellant’ s brief is due 30 days from the date of this order. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a). The State’s brief is due 30 days after appellant’s brief is filed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: O ctober 15, 2015
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

OMAR SHARIFF BEST, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 59 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: 

WAL-MART STORES, INC.,

WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, L.P.,

WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., AND

WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-15-00126-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator=s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 243rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas, 

and conditionally grants relief, in accordance with the opinion of this court. Respondent is 

ordered to vacate the void contempt orders entered on March 26, 2015, April 2, 2015, and 

April 9, 2015, and to enter the necessary order to return to the Wal-Mart defendants the contempt 

fines they paid in satisfaction of the contempt orders.

The writ will issue only if the trial court fails to comply with this opinion.

All costs herein having been paid, no further order is made with respect thereto.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of J.C., a Child

No. 06-22-00042-CV

Appeal from the 71st District Court of 

Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 21-

0471). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Chief Justice Stevens, Justice van Cleef and 

Justice Rambin participating. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated her inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MARCH 2, 2023

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
# L_2012250EN.01002001.xml

| 15.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 250/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 250/20

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 699/2012 of 30 July 2012 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of certain tube and pipe fittings of iron or steel originating in Russia and Turkey

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 203 of 31 July 2012
  )

On page 38, recital 14:

for:

‘UNIFIT Boru Baglanti Elemanlari Ltd Sti, Tuzla, Istanbul, Turkey.’,

read:

‘UNIFIT BORU BAĞLANTI ELEM. END. MAM. SAN. VE TİC. AȘ, Tuzla, Istanbul, Turkey.’;

on page 50, Article 1(2), in the table:

for:

‘UNIFIT Boru Baglanti Elemanlari Ltd Sti, Tuzla, Istanbul’,

read:

‘UNIFIT BORU BAĞLANTI ELEM. END. MAM. SAN. VE TİC. AȘ, Tuzla, Istanbul’.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spirit Finance Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Catherine Long, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                                       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 7, 2006
|   | /s/ Catherine Long      |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Catherine Long          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# L_2017294DE.01004201.xml

| 11.11.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 294/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 294/42

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 978/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 25. Oktober 2012 über ein Schema allgemeiner Zollpräferenzen und zur Aufhebung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 732/2008 des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 303 vom 31. Oktober 2012
  )

Seiten 30 bis 57, Tabelle in Anhang V „Liste der Waren, die unter die allgemeine Regelung nach Artikel 1 Absatz 2 Buchstabe a fallen“, Spalte 5 „Empfindlich/nicht empfindlich“:

Anstatt:

„S“

muss es heißen:

„E“.

Anstatt:

„NS“

muss es heißen:

„NE“.

---
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media West LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: May 13, 2008
    By:
    /s/ David C. SwansonDavid C. SwansonChairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer 27
First Amendment to PacifiCare Executive Retirement Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.48 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PACIFICARE 
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
  
 This First Amendment to the PacifiCare Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan dated December 17, 2003 (the “Amendment”), hereby amends the PacifiCare Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the
“Plan”) as follows: 
  
 1. Amendment to Article
1. Article 1 is hereby amended by inserting the following Section 1.13A in between Section 1.13 and Section 1.14: 
  
 “1.13A MONTHLY COMPENSATION means with respect to any Participant the monthly base salary and corresponding bonus earned for such month in which such
monthly base salary was paid to such Participant by the Employer.” 
  
 2. Amendment to Section 1.13. Section 1.13 is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “1.13 FINAL AVERAGE COMPENSATION means the Participant’s average Monthly Compensation during the 36 consecutive month period that produces the
highest such average.” 
  
 3. Limitation on
Amendment. This Amendment was approved by the Board in accordance with Section 5.7. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, no terms or provisions of the Plan are modified or changed and the terms and provisions of the Plan, as amended
by this Amendment, shall continue in full force and effect. 
  
 4. Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF HELEN J. 

DISABATO, DECEASED

PETITION OF: PETER DIGIOVANNI

:

:

:

:

:

No. 151 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of November, 2017, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Exhibit 4.12      CONSENT OF FRANCIS CHARTRAND   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2014 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Francis Chartrand, participated in the preparation of the following technical reports:  - Technical Report and Recommendations, Summer 2013 Exploration Program, Wabamisk Property, Quebec, completed in March 2013 ;and  - Technical Report and Recommendations, Winter 2013 Exploration Program  Wabamisk Project completed in November 2013;  concerning mineralized material in the Anatacau and Wabamisk properties for the Company (collectively the Reports). Portions of the Reports are summarized, for both properties, under headings Item III  Description of the Business  3.2.4 Geological Setting; 3.2.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.2.6 Mineralization in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2014 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,


| |                                        |  | 
| | -------------------------------------- |  | 
| | /S/
Francis Chartrand                  |  | 
| | Name:
Francis Chartrand, Ph.D., P.Geo. |  | 

May 15, 2014
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

SPENCER HARRISON COTE and DAWN

JANNISE COTE and

IN THE INTERST OF K. G. C., a child. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 22

- 00016

- CV

Appeal from the

85th Judicial District Court

of Brazos County, Texas

(TC# 21

- 000669

- CVD

- 85 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, if any, see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43. 5, for performance of the

judgment and all costs, both in this Court and the court below, for which let execution issue. This

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2023.

SANDEE B. MARION, Chief Justice (Ret.)

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Soto, J., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.) (Sitting by Assignment)