alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2018011EN.01000601.xml

| 16.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 11/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 11/6

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision (EU) 2017/175 of 25 January 2017 on establishing EU Ecolabel criteria for tourist accommodation

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 28 of 2 February 2017
  )

On page 20, in the Annex, in the table in criterion 6(a)(ii):

for:

| ‘Water-based space heater type | Efficiency indicator |
| --- | --- |
| Heat pump heaters (two options are valid for heat pumps using refrigerants with GWP ≤ 2 000 , option 2 is mandatory for heat pumps using refrigerants with GWP ≤ 2 000 ) | Option 1 — Minimum Seasonal Space Energy Heating Efficiency/refrigerant GWP values |
| ηs ≥ 107 %/[0-500]
  ηs ≥ 110 %/(500-1 000 ]
  ηs ≥ 120 %/(1 000 -2 000 ]
  ηs ≥ 130 %/> 2 000 |
| Option 2 — GHG emission limits |
| 150 g CO2-equivalent/kWh heating output’ |

‘Water-based space heater type

Efficiency indicator

Heat pump heaters (two options are valid for heat pumps using refrigerants with GWP ≤ 2 000 , option 2 is mandatory for heat pumps using refrigerants with GWP ≤ 2 000 )

Option 1 — Minimum Seasonal Space Energy Heating Efficiency/refrigerant GWP values

ηs ≥ 107 %/[0-500]

ηs ≥ 110 %/(500-1 000 ]

ηs ≥ 120 %/(1 000 -2 000 ]

ηs ≥ 130 %/> 2 000

Option 2 — GHG emission limits

150 g CO2-equivalent/kWh heating output’

read:

| ‘Water-based space heater type | Efficiency indicator |
| --- | --- |
| Heat pump heaters (two options are valid for heat pumps using refrigerants with GWP ≤ 2 000 , option 2 is mandatory for heat pumps using refrigerants with GWP > 2 000 ) | Option 1 — Minimum Seasonal Space Energy Heating Efficiency/refrigerant GWP values |
| ηs ≥ 107 %/[0-500]
  ηs ≥ 110 %/(500-1 000 ]
  ηs ≥ 120 %/(1 000 -2 000 ] |
| Option 2 — GHG emission limits |
| 150 g CO2-equivalent/kWh heating output’ |

‘Water-based space heater type

Efficiency indicator

Heat pump heaters (two options are valid for heat pumps using refrigerants with GWP ≤ 2 000 , option 2 is mandatory for heat pumps using refrigerants with GWP > 2 000 )

Option 1 — Minimum Seasonal Space Energy Heating Efficiency/refrigerant GWP values

ηs ≥ 107 %/[0-500]

ηs ≥ 110 %/(500-1 000 ]

ηs ≥ 120 %/(1 000 -2 000 ]

Option 2 — GHG emission limits

150 g CO2-equivalent/kWh heating output’

On page 23, in the Annex, in paragraph (a) in criterion 12:

for:

‘In case there are one to four suppliers of individual green tariffs offering 50 % of the electricity from renewable energy sources or of separate GOs certificates where the accommodation is located:’,

read:

‘Unless paragraph (b) applies, in case there are suppliers of individual green tariffs offering at least 50 % of the electricity from renewable energy sources or of separate GOs certificates where the accommodation is located:’.

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5498 

To increase the cap on the obligation of receipts for the Crime Victims 

Fund. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2008 

Mr. POE (for himself, Mr. COSTA, Mr. WEINER, Mr. BRALEY of Iowa, and 

Mr. REICHERT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To increase the cap on the obligation of receipts for the 

Crime Victims Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE OF CAP ON THE OBLIGATION OF RE4 CEIPTS FOR THE CRIME VICTIMS FUND. 

5 Section 513 of Division B of the Consolidated Appro6 priations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110–161) is amended by 

7 striking ‘‘$590,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$661,000,000’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 31 (a)**CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony J. Orlando, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MSW Energy Holdings II LLC;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 9, 2005         By: /s/ Anthony J. Orlando             Anthony J. Orlando      Chief Executive Officer and President  
32
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5457 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Deltamethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2008 

Mr. CLEAVER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Deltamethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DELTAMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.26 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The Harmonized 

8 Tariff Schedule of the United States is further amended 

9 by striking heading 9902.01.49. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

11 this section apply with respect to goods entered, or withVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:59 Feb 15, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5457.IH H5457

rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5457 IH

1 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 

2 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 494 

To provide for the conditional conveyance of any interest retained by the 

United States in St. Joseph Memorial Hall in St. Joseph, Michigan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. UPTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To provide for the conditional conveyance of any interest 

retained by the United States in St. Joseph Memorial 

Hall in St. Joseph, Michigan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF RETAINED INTEREST IN ST. 

4 JOSEPH MEMORIAL HALL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the terms and condi6 tions of subsection (c), the Administrator of General Serv7 ices shall convey to the city of St. Joseph, Michigan, by 

8 quitclaim deed, any interest retained by the United States 

9 in St. Joseph Memorial Hall. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 494 IH

1 (b) ST. JOSEPH MEMORIAL HALL.—In this section, 

2 the term ‘‘St. Joseph Memorial Hall’’ means the property 

3 subject to a conveyance from the Secretary of Commerce 

4 to the city of St. Joseph, Michigan, by Quitclaim Deed 

5 dated May 9, 1936, recorded in Liber 310, at page 404, 

6 in the Register of Deeds for Berrien County, Michigan. 

7 (c) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The conveyance 

8 under subsection (a) is subject to the following terms and 

9 conditions: 

10 (1) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the 

11 conveyance under subsection (a), the City of St. Jo12 seph, Michigan, shall pay $10,000.00 to the Untied 

13 States. 

14 (2) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.— 

15 The Administrator of General Services may require 

16 such additional terms and conditions to the convey17 ance under subsection (a) as the Administrator con18 siders appropriate to protect the interest of the 

19 United States. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 48 9- CV I N RE AL L EN SAM UEL S E NTERP RI SES , I NC . , E T AL. REL ATO RS

----- ----- -- OR I GI NALP R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON 1

----- ----- -- T h e c o u r t h a s c o n s id e r e d r e la t o r s ’ p e t it io n f o r w r it o f m a n d a m u s a n d is of th e o pi ni on t hatr el i efs houl d be de ni ed. Accor di ngl y, r el at or s’ pe t i t i on f or w r i t ofm and am us i s den i ed. R el at or s shal l pay al l cost s oft hi s or i gi nal pr oceedi ng, f orw hi ch l et execut i on i ssue.
T E R R I E L I VI NGS T ON J U S T I C E PA N EL: L I V I N G STO N an d M C C O Y, JJ. DEL I VERE D: J a nu a r y 6, 2009
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Accessory Holdings Corporation
      (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Ronald J. Gardhouse, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.














/s/
      RONALD J. GARDHOUSE


Ronald
      J.
      Gardhouse


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)


May
      12,
      2006
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Golden State Bancorp Inc. :


We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  registration  statement  Nos.
333-67837 and 333-74615 on Form S-8 and in registration statement Nos. 333-47309
and  333-28037  on Form S-3 of Golden  State  Bancorp  Inc. of our report  dated
January 18, 2000,  relating to the  consolidated  balance sheets of Golden State
Bancorp  Inc. as of December  31,  1999 and 1998,  and the related  consolidated
statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year  period ended  December 31, 1999,  which
report  appears in the  December  31, 1999 annual  report on Form 10-K of Golden
State Bancorp Inc.


                                  /s/ KPMG LLP


San Francisco, California
March 24, 2000
$13.9 $13.2 $11.0

FY13

$9.9 $10.4 $9.4 $9.0

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

MASSACHUSETTS 

#8 #17 3.1% $2,700 #8 #32 #32

$18.6 B SPENT IN 3.1% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $17.4 B CONTRACT 23,533 NUMBER OF $1.2 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 1%

Service: 27%

Development: 8%

Supplies and

Equipment: 64%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

17%

27%

27%

29%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 9%

27%

Civilian: 

ational 

Reserve:

30%

N

Guard: 34%

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Allocations, By Service 

Army

51%

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

37%

Other Defense

3%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Raytheon $6.4 B

General Electric $2.1 B

Moderna Inc. $1.2 B

General Dynamics $1.1 B

Massachusetts Institute of Technology $1.1 B

Charles Stark Draper Laboratory $475.7 M

MITRE $357.2 M

SAIC $241.9 M

Oasis Systems $219.2 M

Lockheed Martin $158.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$17.4

$1.2 BILLION 23,533

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Middlesex 1,232 4,669 2,016 2,256 10,173

Hampden 181 1,082 1,529 2,749 5,541

Barnstable 89 417 1,901 0 2,407

Suffolk 457 329 127 254 1,167

Worcester 28 83 642 158 911

Bristol ND 70 438 348 ND

Plymouth 34 44 348 388 814

Norfolk ND 18 371 252 ND

Essex 14 156 372 32 574

Hampshire 13 19 168 0 200

60 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MASSACHUSETTS FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Middlesex

Essex

Bristol

Berkshire

Norfolk

Suffolk

Plymouth

Worcester

Hampshire

Barnstable

(M = millions)

$10.5 B 

$4.2 B 

$650.5 M 

$447.7 M 

$428.1 M 

$398.1 M 

$360.0 M 

$139.5 M 

$100.3 M 

$97.2 M 

Middlesex

Hampden

Barnstable

Suffolk

Essex

Worcester

Plymouth

Norfolk

Bristol

Berkshire

$688.7 M 

$194.6 M 

$92.1 M 

$81.2 M 

$23.9 M 

$23.8 M 

$20.7 M 

$19.9 M 

$19.3 M 

$8.1 M 

Essex

Berkshire

Middlesex

Hampshire Worcester

Norfolk

Bristol

Barnstable

Plymouth

Essex

Berkshire

Middlesex

Worcester

Norfolk

Bristol

Barnstable

Plymouth

Hampden

Suffolk

Suffolk

61
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Registration Nos. 333-123332, 333-58648, 333-59826, 333-82122, 333-104697, 333-113299 and333-134618) and Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-107799, 333-107028, 333-129687 and 333-140424) ofour reports dated March 6, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofIntrogen Therapeutics, Inc., Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPAustin, Texas
* Pursuant to 5th C I R

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

1 The pleadings of a pro se l itigant must be given a liberal

construction. Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972).

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20026

Summary Calendar

DAVID ANTHONY DYBOWSKI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WAYNE SCOTT, director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice,

Institutional Division and GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas

Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division,

Defendant-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-97-CV-3065)

August 13, 1998

Before JOHNSON, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

David Anthony Dybowski, Texas prisoner #670925, appeals pro se

the district court’s dismissal as frivolous of his claims filed

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. When construed liberally, 1 the

arguments contained in his pleadings contend that the present

statute governing the calculation of his good conduct time violates

his equal protection and due process rights.

We review the district court’s dismissal of Dybowski’s equal2

protection claim for abuse of discretion. D enton v. Hernandez

, 504

U.S. 25, 33-34 (1992). Dybowski was convicted of an aggravated

offense. He argues that T E X

. C ODE C RIM P. art. 42.18 §8(c) (West

1990) violates his equal protection rights because it prevents good

conduct time from being c redited toward the prison sentences of

prisoners convicted of aggravated offenses. Classifying prisoners

by the offense of conviction does not create a suspect class.

Wottlin v. Fleming

, 136 F.3d 1032, 1036-37 (5th Cir. 1998).

Furthermore, a prisoner does not have a constitutional right to be

released before the expiration of a valid sentence. Id . at 1037.

Therefore, th ere need only be a rational basis for the

classification. After a careful review of the record and the

controlling authorities, we hold that the district court did not

abuse its discretion in concluding that a rational basis existed.

Dybowski did not raise his due process argument in the

district court, so we review this issue for plain error. See

Highlands Ins. v. National Union Fire Ins. , 27 F.3d 1027, 1031-32

(5th Cir. 1994). Dybowski contends that the repeal of T EX AS R EV

.

C IV

. S TAT

. A NN

. art. 6184-1 (West 1979), which would have allowed a

credit towards his sentence for good conduct time regardless of his

offense, violated his due process rights. Because Dybowski did not

earn good conduct time during the effective date of the statute,

his claim is without merit. Thus, the district court did not

plainly err in dismissing as frivolous Dybowski’s due process

claim.

AFFIRMED.3
STATE v. WILLIAMS.

No. COA04-1677.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (03CRS230846, 03CRS230847)

Case reported without published opinion No error.
### Th e Honorable David D. Noce, United States Magistrate Judg e 1 

### for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was r eferred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 2 8 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

# United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-3815

___________ Valerie Townes, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. City of St. Louis, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: April 23, 1997 Filed: April 29, 1997

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Valerie Townes appeals fr om the district court's order granting the 1 City of St. Louis summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Havin g carefu lly reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we conclud e that the district court's judgment was correct and that an extende d discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B .

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5283 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5283

            To extend the suspension of duty on Quinclorac.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

 Mr. Ferguson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To extend the suspension of duty on Quinclorac.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. QUINCLORAC.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.22.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 3,7-dichloro-8-
quinolinecarboxylic acid) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN RE K.C.

No. COA04-1689.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Buncombe (03J268)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth
in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Frederic H. Moll, M.D., in his capacity as Chief
Executive Officer of Hansen Medical, Inc., hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (i) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Hansen Medical, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 16, 2009



/s/ FREDERIC H. MOLL, M.D.Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Hansen Medical, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or
after the date of the Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.