alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 39931]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14192]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of The Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of 
countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation 
with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may 
require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott 
(within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986).

Iraq
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
Yemen

Lindsay Kitzinger,
Acting International Tax Counsel, (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2022-14192 Filed 7-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P
STATE v. Timothy C. AUTRY.

No. 482P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th day of August 2005 by Defendant for Writ:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of October 2005."
STATE v. NOBLE.

No. COA05-249.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (03CRS81331)

Case without published opinion. No error.
NUMBER 13-18-00268-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 

AND EASTMAN IN ITS ASSUMED OR COMMON NAME

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Relator Eastman Chemical Company and Eastman in its assumed or common 

name filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to transfer 

venue of the underlying suit from Nueces County, Texas to Galveston County, Texas 

based on mandatory venue regarding land. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. 

§ 15.011 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.). 

The Court requests that the real party in interest Gulf Hydrogen and Energy, Inc., 

or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response 
2

to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date 

of this order. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

6th day of June, 2018.
NO. 07-03-0341-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

SEPTEMBER 12, 2003

______________________________

RICHARD PREWITT, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 356TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARDIN COUNTY;

NO. 14648; HONORABLE BRITT PLUNK, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss his appeal. Pursuant to

Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the request to withdraw the notice

of appeal is signed by appellant. No decision of this Court having been delivered to date,
2

we grant the motion. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will

issue forthwith.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice

Do not publish.
# L_2017094EN.01003701.xml

| 7.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 94/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 94/37

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2017/663

of 3 April 2017

appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of Sweden, of the European Economic and Social Committee

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Swedish Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Oskar WALLNER, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Oskar WALLNER,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Imse SPRAGG NILSSON, Expert, National Council of Swedish Youth Organisations (LSU), is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 3 April 2017.

For the Council

The President

R. GALDES

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 September 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 October 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23).

2

---
STATE v. ROBERTS.

No. COA05-1032.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Robeson (02CRS4078, 02CRS4079, 02CRS4080, 02CRS4081)

Case without published opinion. No error.
# L_2016114EN.01000501.xml

| 28.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 114/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 114/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/656

of 18 April 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Patata del Fucino (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Patata del Fucino’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy's application to register the name ‘Patata del Fucino’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Patata del Fucino’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Patata del Fucino’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Patata del Fucino’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 April 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 438, 30.12.2015, p. 8.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7852
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DAVID ANTHONY CAIN, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-95, CA-95-1154-3) Submitted: January 13, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998 Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Anthony Cain, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Cain , Nos. CR-93-95; CA-95-1154-3 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 1 & Nov. 20, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Shawn M. REEVES v. YELLOW TRANSPORTATION, INC. and EMPLOYMENT SECURITY COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 373P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Daniel F. Read, Durham, for Shawn M. Reeves.

Thomas H. Hodges, Jr., Raleigh, for Employment Security Comm., Yellow Transportation, Inc.

*512*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of July 2005 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."
# L_2016040EN.01000301.xml

| 17.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 40/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 40/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/215

of 1 February 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Aydın İnciri (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Turkey's application to register the name ‘Aydın İnciri’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Turkey's application to register the name ‘Aydın İnciri’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Aydın İnciri’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Aydın İnciri’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Aydın İnciri’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 February 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 299, 11.9.2015, p. 29.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
IN RE J.L.G.

No. COA05-107.

No. COA05-240.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Watauga (03J36).

Case without published opinion. Appeal Dismissed Affirmed.
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.2





Compensation Terms Gregory E. Poling
Appointment as Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors


Effective as of August 1, 2019 your role and compensation will change.	
			
	Element
	Current
	Effective August 1st

	Role
	Chief Executive Officer
	Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors

	Base Salary
	$800,000
	$600,000

	Target Bonus*
	100%
	100%






*Bonus at end of year would be prorated based on time in salary (58.33% at $800k to August 1 and 41.66% at $600k)


I understand and agree the changes as described above.
Signed
		
	/s/ GREGORY E. POLING
	/s/ GERALD G. COLLELA


		
	Executive Chairman
	Chairman of the Compensation Committee


		
	Date: June 27, 2019
	Date: June 27, 2019
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5400 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5400

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2008

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, as the ``Sgt. 
              Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SGT. MICHAEL M. KASHKOUSH POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Sgt. Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. 
Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5517 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5517

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2008

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 7231 FM 1960 in Humble, Texas, as the ``Texas Military Veterans Post 
                               Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEXAS MILITARY VETERANS POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7231 FM 1960 in Humble, Texas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Texas Military Veterans Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Texas 
Military Veterans Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 15, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5327 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 ENTRIES OF TRUCK TIRES. 

5 (a) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION REQUIRED.— 

6 Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff Act 

7 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520), or any other provi8 sion of law, U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall, 

9 not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act— 

11 (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty each 

12 entry described in subsection (b) containing any 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5327 IH

1 merchandise which, at the time of original liquida2 tion, was merchandise eligible for duty-free treat3 ment under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

4 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.); and 

5 (2) refund any duties and interest paid on such 

6 entries. 

7 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

8 subsection (a) are the following: 

Port Code Entry Number Date of Entry 

2704 EA1–0163366–0 04/19/2006 

2704 EA1–0163478–3 04/26/2006 

2704 EA1–0163598–8 05/03/2006 

2704 EA1–0163718–2 05/10/2006 

2704 EA1–0163834–7 05/17/2006 

2704 EA1–0163951–9 05/24/2006 

2704 EA1–0164080–6 05/31/2006 

2704 EA1–0164167–1 06/07/2006 

2704 EA1–0164329–7 06/14/2006 

2704 EA1–0164423–8 06/21/2006 

2704 EA1–0164517–7 06/28/2006 

2704 EA1–0165385–8 08/16/2006 

2704 EA1–0165491–4 08/23/2006 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE v. RAMOS

No. COA05-1109

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Cabarrus (03CRS2175, 03CRS2176, 03CRS2177).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
SKINNER et al. v. PREFERRED CREDIT et al.

No. 525A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 18, 2006.

Gary K. Shipman, William G. Wright, Wilmington, A. Holt Rowell, III, Daniel Myers, Eric G. Calhoun, Dallas, TX, for Skinners et al.

Hada V. Haulsee, Ronald R. Davis, Bradley R. Johnson, Winston-Salem, for Preferred Credit Trust.

Robert R. Marcus, Angela L. Little, Greensboro, Daniel J. Tobin, for Impac Funding.

Gary R. Govert, Special Deputy Attorney General, Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Solicitor-General, for Attorney General.

Carlene McNulty, for N.C. Justice Center.

Kenneth L. Schorr, Charlotte, for LSSP.

William J. Whalen, for Pisgah Legal Services.

Susan Gottsegen, Winston-Salem, for LASNNC.

Maria D. McIntyre, Charlotte, for FPLC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of January 2006 by Center for Responsible Lending, N.C. Justice Center, Legal Services of Southern Piedmont, Pisgah Legal Services, Legal Aid Society of Northwest North Carolina and Financial Protection Law Center for leave to file Amici Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amici Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 18th day of January 2006."
1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-3635

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Kevin Jay Bruce, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 7, 2005 Filed: July 13, 2005

___________ Before BYE, RILEY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Kevin Bruce pleaded guilty to escape. See18 U.S.C. § 751(a). His sentencing hearing occurred after the Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), but before the Court announced in United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), that the federal sentencing guidelines were effectively advisory in all cases. At sentencing, when Bruce challenged the constitutionality of the Guidelines under Blakely , the district court 1 stated: “I have taken a position as to the guidelines that they are neither constitutional nor-2- unconstitutional, that if they are eventually found to be constitutional, I’m going to sentence today on the grounds of those guidelines, and if they’re found to be unconstitutional, I will have been sentencing on the ground that the guidelines were unconstitutional, but I was using the guidelines as a guide only, not relying on them as such.” (S. Tr. 6). The court then sentenced Bruce to 37 months, the bottom of the applicable guidelines sentencing range. Bruce now challenges the sentence. We conclude that any error in applying the mandatory guidelines for one of the two alternative sentences is harmless, as the district court clearly indicated that it would impose the same sentence under an advisory system. See United States v. Thompson , 408 F.3d 994, 996-97 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam). The sentence also is not unreasonable with regard to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________