alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act      of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              |                                                                                             |
|-------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |                                                                                             |
| May      15, 2008 | /s/Todd      B. Parriott                                                                         |
|              | Todd      B. Parriott,                                                                           |
|              | Chairman      of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Investment      Officer |
|              |                                                                                             |
|              |                                                                                             |
| May      15, 2008 | /s/G.      Steven Dawson                                                                         |
|              | G.      Steven Dawson,                                                                           |
|              | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                     |
STATE v. Michael Edward PINCH.

No. 43A81-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

James P. Cooney, Charlotte, for Michael Edward Pinch.

R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of September 2005 by the Attorney General for Extension of Time for Filing State's Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. The Attorney General will have until 21 October 2005 to file his Petition for Writ of Certiorari. By order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of October 2005."
**Exhibit 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION**


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZHONGPIN INC. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Xianfu
      Zhu, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





Date:    
                November 10, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Xianfu ZhuXianfu
                ZhuChief
                Executive Officer








This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 10.1

                DESCRIPTION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

         Effective as of May 18, 2005, non-employee directors of Pacific
Ethanol, Inc. (the "Company") receive $1,500 per board or committee meeting
attended, in person or via telephone, in consideration for their services as
members of the Board of Directors of the Company and its committees. Effective
as of May 18, 2005, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company
receives $80,000 annually for his services as Chairman of the Board of Directors
of the Company. In addition, effective as of May 18, 2005, the Chairman of the
Audit Committee of the Company receives, in lieu of the $1,500 standard
compensation described above, $3,500 per Audit Committee meeting attended, in
person or via telephone, in consideration for his services as Chairman of the
Audit Committee of the Company.

         Non-employee directors are reimbursed for certain reasonable and
documented expenses in connection with attendance at meetings of the Board of
Directors and committees of the Company.

         Non-employee directors may also receive options from time to time under
the Company's stock option plans and otherwise.

         The following non-employee directors received grants of non-qualified
stock options in the following amounts to purchase shares of common stock of the
Company:

                    DIRECTOR                        NO. OF SHARES
                    --------                        -------------

                    William L. Jones                      50,000

                    Terry L. Stone                        20,000

                    Kenneth J. Friedman                   15,000

                    Frank P. Greinke                      15,000

                    John Pimentel                         15,000

         In addition, new directors, upon their appointment, are to receive
grants of non-qualified stock options to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock
of the Company.

         The options granted or to be granted shall include the following terms:

         o        The options shall be granted under the Company's 2004 Stock
                  Option Plan (the "2004 Plan") to the extent shares are then
                  available under the 2004 Plan and the grant under the 2004
                  Plan can be made in compliance with applicable securities
                  laws.

         o        The exercise price of the options shall be equal to the Fair
                  Market Value of a share of the Company's common stock as
                  defined in the 2004 Plan.

         o        The expiration date of the options shall be ten years after
                  their date of grant or such earlier date as is provided in the
                  2004 Plan or in the applicable stock option agreements.

         o        The options shall fully vest and become exercisable one year
                  following their date of grant.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 123RD DISTRICT COURT OF SHELBY COUNTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 18th

day of November, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

NO. 12-15-00272-CR; Trial Court No. 15-CV-33,300

By per curiam opinion.

DERON BOWLDS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the motion of the Appellant to dismiss the appeal 

herein, and the same being considered, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by 

this Court that the motion to dismiss be granted and the appeal be dismissed, and that the 

decision be certified to the court below for observance.”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 28th day of December, 2015.

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By: _______________________________

Chief Deputy Clerk
# L_2016149EN.01000601.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 149/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 149/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2016/890

of 6 June 2016

amending Decision 2014/219/CFSP on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 28, Article 42(4) and Article 43(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 15 April 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/219/CFSP (1) on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 15 April 2014, the Council adopted Decision 2014/219/CFSP (1) on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali).

| (2) | On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/50 (2) providing EUCAP Sahel Mali with a reference amount until 14 January 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/50 (2) providing EUCAP Sahel Mali with a reference amount until 14 January 2017.

| (3) | EUCAP Sahel Mali should take enhanced security measures and the number of staff should be adapted. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

EUCAP Sahel Mali should take enhanced security measures and the number of staff should be adapted.

| (4) | Decision 2014/219/CFSP should be amended to adapt the reference amount for EUCAP Sahel Mali, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2014/219/CFSP should be amended to adapt the reference amount for EUCAP Sahel Mali,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 14 of Decision 2014/219/CFSP, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 April 2014 to 14 January 2015 shall be EUR 5 500 000. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 January 2015 to 14 January 2016 shall be EUR 11 400 000. The financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to EUCAP Sahel Mali from 15 January 2016 to 14 January 2017 shall be EUR 19 775 000. The financial reference amount for the subsequent periods shall be decided by the Council.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 6 June 2016.

For the Council

The President

H.G.J. KAMP

---

(1)  Decision 2014/219/CFSP of 15 April 2014 on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali), (OJ L 113, 16.4.2014, p. 21).

1

(2)  Decision (CFSP) 2016/50 of 18 January 2016 amending Decision 2014/219/CFSP on the European Union CSDP Mission in Mali (EUCAP Sahel Mali) (OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 48).

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5474 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5474

To prevent payments of educational assistance for veterans and members 
    of the Selected Reserve from being offset in the calculation of 
         financial aid under the Higher Education Act of 1965.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 19, 2008

 Mr. Mitchell introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prevent payments of educational assistance for veterans and members 
    of the Selected Reserve from being offset in the calculation of 
         financial aid under the Higher Education Act of 1965.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Veteran Financial Aid 
Fairness Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT AS OTHER FINANCIAL AID.

    Section 480(j)(1) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087vv(j)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``veterans' education benefits as in 
        subsection (c) of this section, and''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``, but excluding any payments of educational 
        assistance to veterans under title 38, United States Code, and 
        to members of the Selected Reserve under chapters 1606 and 1607 
        of title 10, United States Code''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. BYRD.

No. COA05-358.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Wilkes (02CRS52026)

Case without published opinion. Remanded for resentencing.
In the Matter of O.C. and O.B., Minor Children. appealed by Chiquetta C., mother.

No. 465P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Katharine Chester, for respondent-mother, Chiquetta C.

Alan Edmonds, Charlotte, for Mecklenburg County DSS.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of August 2005 by Respondent (Chiquetta C.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
SKINNER et al. v. PREFERRED CREDIT et al.

No. 525A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 14, 2005.

William G. Wright, Wilmington, A. Holt Rowell, III, Mount Pleasant, SC, Daniel Myers, Eric G. Calhoun, Dallas, TX, for Skinners et al.

Hada V. Haulsee, Ronald R. Davis, Bradley R. Johnson, Winston-Salem, for Preferred Credit Trust.

Robert R. Marcus, Angela L. Little, Greensboro, Daniel J. Tobin, for Impac Funding.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th day of December 2005 by Plaintiffs for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiffs (Skinners) shall have up to and including the 17th day of January 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of December 2005."
26 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Centene Corp. $3.5 B

Northrop Grumman $3.1 B

General Dynamics $2.3 B

Lockheed Martin $2.2 B

General Atomics $2.0 B

iHealth Labs, Inc. $1.8 B

Boeing $1.7 B

Raytheon Technologies $1.5 B

Aerospace Corp. $1.0 B

SpaceX $756.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

CALIFORNIA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$17.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

272,971

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

San Diego 84,638 23,437 1,003 7,999 117,077

San Bernardino 11,927 3,161 757 359 16,204

Ventura 4,356 5,802 1,204 991 12,353

Los Angeles 1,377 3,404 3,126 4,364 12,271

Solano 6,865 1,621 263 3,201 11,950

Kern 2,595 8,348 230 297 11,470

Riverside 472 2,788 1,314 4,628 9,202

Monterey 4,583 3,750 67 460 8,860

Kings 6,934 850 0 433 8,217

Orange 502 1,101 2,186 3,625 7,414

Construction: 3% Research and

Development: 13%

Service: 48%

Supplies and

Equipment: 36%

Civilian: 23% Active Duty: 58%

National 

Guard: 7%

Reserve: 13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

13%

33%

30%

24%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

16%

66%

14%

3%

$27.6 $27.3

$32.6 $35.6 $36.7 $32.8

$38.1

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#3 #29 10.1% $1,440 #3 #1 #1 #2

$56.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.6% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$38.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

272,971 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$17.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$867.2 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$38.7
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 27

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Kern

Riverside

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Kern

San Bernardino

CALIFORNIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions (M=millions) (M=millions))

FISCAL YEAR 2022

San Diego

Los Angeles

Santa Clara

Sacramento

Orange

Ventura

Kern

Alameda

Monterey

San Bernardino

(M = millions, B = billions)

$11.9 B

$9.3 B

$4.7 B

$3.9 B

$1.3 B

$962.4 M

$886.7 M

$684.8 M

$622.2 M

$598.9 M

San Diego

Ventura

Kern

San Bernardino

Solano

Monterey

Los Angeles

Kings

Riverside

Yuba

$7.4 B

$1.0 B

$998.2 M

$829.5 M

$772.8 M

$715.8 M

$671.1 M

$525.2 M

$471.4 M

$367.5 M

Los Angeles

Ventura

Orange

Alameda

Monterey

San Diego

Sacramento

Santa Clara

Monterey

Ventura

San Diego

Los Angeles

San Bernardino

Kings

Yuba

Solano
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed September 6, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-151

Lower Tribunal No. 22-7472

________________

MCZ Centrum Flamingo II, LLC, et al.,

Appellants,

vs.

Flamingo/South Beach I Condominium Association, Inc.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Michael A. Hanzman, Judge.

Gelber Schachter & Greenberg, P.A., Gerald E. Greenberg, and 

Christopher S. Sundby; Podhurst Orseck, P.A., Stephen F. Rosenthal, and 

Christina H. Martinez, for appellants.

Morgan & Morgan, P.A., Jared A. Levy (West Palm Beach), and 

Valerie C. David (Orlando), for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
Ex 10.10

Extension of Note to Mr. Vittoria

Joseph V. Vittoria 
1616 South Ocean Boulevard 
Palm Beach, FL 33480 
(T) 561 659 0860 (F) 561 659 1045

Puradyn
Filter Technologies, Inc. 
2017 High Ridge Road 
Boynton Beach, FL 33426 
Attention: Alan J. Sandler, VP, CAO

February 24, 2011

RE:     Standby Commitment Agreement Amendment
#13

Dear Mr.
Sandler:

Pursuant to
the Standby Commitment Agreement letters dated March 28, 2002, and March 14,
2003 and all Amendments thereto, I, Joseph Vittoria (the Lending Party),
agree to extend the payback dates from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012.

All other
terms defined in the original Standby Commitment Agreement letters and the
Amendments thereto, not otherwise in conflict with this Amendment, shall remain
in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed and
delivered by the respective officers hereunto duly authorized on the date first
written above.

|                                   |                                                                |  |                       
|---------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|                                   |                                                                |  | /s/ Joseph V. Vittoria
|                                   |                                                                |  | Joseph V. Vittoria    
|                                   |                                                                |  |                       
|Accepted and Agreed:               |                                                                | 
|Puradyn Filter Technologies,
 Inc. |                                                                | 
|                                   |                                                                |  |                       
|By:                                | /s/
 Alan J. Sandler                                           |  |                       
|                                   | Alan J. Sandler, Vice President,
 Chief Administration Officer |  |                       

---
NORTH COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, INC. v. AUBIN.

No. COA05-1301.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from Davidson (01CVS2238).

Case without published opinion. Vacated.
STATE v. Prince McBRIDE.

No. 564P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 24, 2005.

Keischa M. Lovelace, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Prince McBride.

Michael Parker, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of October 2005 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 28th day of October 2005 to file and serve his/her response to Petition for Discretionary Review with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of October 2005."
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing WorldWide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Winzkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

/S/ MICHAEL WINZKOWSKI
-----------------------
Michael Winzkowski
Chief Executive Officer
February 15, 2006


                                       25