alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE v. Jimmy E. McARTHUR.

No. 444P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of October 2005 by Defendant for "Petition for Rehearing":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of December 2005."
Exhibit 31.1
                                 CERTIFICATIONS


I, Paritosh K. Choksi, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-K of ATEL Cash  Distribution
Fund VII, LP;

2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  annual  report  does not  contain  any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period  covered by this annual
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included  in this annual  report,  fairly  present in all  material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others within
     those entities,  particularly during the period in which this annual report
     is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
     procedures  as of December 31, 2003 (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
     of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
     Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):

     a) all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or  operation  of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to record,
     process,  summarize and report  financial data and have  identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
     employees  who  have  a  significant  role  in  the  registrant's  internal
     controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date:        6/1/2004

/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi
-------------------------
Paritosh K. Choksi
Principal financial officer of registrant, Executive
Vice President of General Partner
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

CHARLES RAY CARTER §

§

vs. § Case No. 01-14-01006-CR

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF 

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THIS COURT:

Appellant Charles Ray Carter, through counsel, moves the Court to extend time 

to file his brief, due September 8, 2015, for the following reasons:

1. Counsel, Assistant Public Defender, Melissa Martin has been working on many cases 

including, but not limited to Humphrey v. State , 14-15-00226-CR; Hill v. State, 01-14-00945-

CR; Sanchez v. State, 01-15-00609-CR; Davison v. State, 14-15-00511-CR; Jones v. State, PD0587-CR (brief due September 29, 2015); as well as the instant case and has been unable 

to complete the brief despite due diligence.

2. This is the fourth request for an extension in this case.

3. This is a murder case in which a motion for new trial was held, which involved many 

documents and which lasted several hours. The brief is nearly complete but still requires 

editing. Further, due to some confusion as to which documents belonged in the reporter’s 

record, the record from the hearing needs further correction, despite the first amended 

version submitted to the Court.

4. This office recently lost a member of the appellate staff and his cases have been 

distributed among the seven remaining appellate lawyers; this has temporarily created 

unanticipated scheduling difficulties.

In view of the foregoing, Mr. Carter asks the Court to extend the time to file his

brief for 30 days, or up to and including October 6, 2015. Counsel anticipates filing the 

brief sooner than that but asks for 30 days out of an abundance of caution. This request 

is made in the interest of justice and effective assistance of counsel and not for 

purposes of delay.

ACCEPTED

01-14-01006-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

9/9/2015 3:08:15 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/9/2015 3:08:15 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Respectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief, Harris County Public Defender’s Office

/s/ Melissa Martin

_________________________________

MELISSA MARTIN

Assistant Public Defender

TX. Bar No. 24002532

1201 Franklin St., 13th Fl.

Houston, TX 77002

email: melissa.martin@pdo.hctx.net

713/274-6709 Fax 713/437-4319

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing motion was electronically served on the 

Harris County District Attorney’s office on September 9, 2015.

/s/ Melissa Martin

__________________________

Melissa Martin
Exhibit 10(b)(2)



                             WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF
                   ORAL MODIFICATIONS TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT,
                    BY AND BETWEEN GATEWAY ENERGY CORPORATION
                                AND ROBERT PANICO

                                  July 22, 2005


     Effective upon May 26, 2005, Robert Panico was elected Chief Executive
Officer and President of Gateway Energy Corporation (the "Company") by the Board
of Directors. In connection with that election, the following terms of the
Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Mr. Panico, were amended:

     1.   Base annual salary was increased to $127,200; and

     2.   Robert Panico shall have the position of Chief Executive Officer and
          President of Gateway Energy Corporation.
STATE v. SIMMONS.

No. COA05-494.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 2, 2006.

Certification Date May 22, 2006.

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS37633, 03CRS62847).

Case without published opinion. Vacated.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS

FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

CHARLES RAY CARTER §

§

vs. § Case No. 01

- 14

- 0 1006

- CR

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS §

MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THIS COURT:

Appellant Charles Ray Carter , through counsel, moves the Court to extend time

to file his brief, due September 8

, 2015

, for the following reasons:

1. Counsel, Assistant Public Defender, Melissa Martin has been working on many case s including, but not limited to Humphrey v. State , 14

- 15

- 00226

- CR ; Hill v. State , 01

- 14

- 00945

- CR; Sanchez v. State , 01

- 15

- 00609

- CR; Davison v. State , 14

- 15

- 00511

- CR; Jones v. State, PD

0587

- CR (brief due September 29, 2015); as well as the instant case and has been unable

to complete the brief despite due diligence.

2. This is the fourth request for an extension in this case.

3. This is a murder case in which a motion for new trial was held, which involved many

documents and which lasted several hours. The brief is nearly complete but still requires

editing. Further, due to some confusion as to which documents belonged in the reporter’s

record, the record from the hearing needs further correction, despite the first amended

version submitted to the Court.

4. This office recently lost a member of the appellate staff and his cases have been

distributed among the seven remaining appellate lawyers; this has temporarily created

unanticipated scheduling difficulties.

In view of the foregoing, Mr. Carter asks the Court to extend the time to file his

brief for 30 days, or up to and including October 6

, 2015

. Counsel anticipates filing the

brief sooner than that but asks for 30 days out of an abundance of caution. This request

is made in the interest of justice and effective assistance of counsel and n ot for

purposes of delay. ACCEPTED

01-14-01006-CR

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

9/9/2015 3:08:15 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKRespectfully submitted,

ALEXANDER BUNIN

Chief, Harris County Public Defender’s Office

/s/ Melissa Martin

_________________________________ MELISSA MARTIN

Assistant Public Defender

TX. Bar No. 24002532

1201 Franklin St., 13 th Fl.

Houston, TX 77002

email: melissa.martin@pdo.hctx.net

713/274

- 6709 Fax 713/437

- 4319

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing motion was electronically served on the

Harris County District Attorney’s office on September 9 , 2015

.

/ s/ Melissa Martin

__________________________ Melissa Martin
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5481 

To provide an additional 0.5 percent increase in the rates of military basic 

pay for members of the uniformed services above the pay increase proposed by the Department of Defense so as to ensure at least a minimum 

pay increase of 3.9 percent for members and to further narrow the 

pay gap that exists between the military and private sector pay scales. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 25, 2008 

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide an additional 0.5 percent increase in the rates 

of military basic pay for members of the uniformed services above the pay increase proposed by the Department 

of Defense so as to ensure at least a minimum pay 

increase of 3.9 percent for members and to further narrow the pay gap that exists between the military and 

private sector pay scales. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Pay Improve5 ment Act of 2008’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5481 IH

1 SEC. 2. FISCAL YEAR 2009 INCREASE IN MILITARY BASIC 

2 PAY. 

3 (a) WAIVER OF SECTION 1009 ADJUSTMENT.—The 

4 adjustment to become effective during fiscal year 2009 re5 quired by section 1009 of title 37, United States Code, 

6 in the rates of monthly basic pay authorized members of 

7 the uniformed services shall not be made. 

8 (b) INCREASE IN BASIC PAY.—Effective on January 

9 1, 2009, the rates of monthly basic pay for members of 

10 the uniformed services are increased by 3.9 percent. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
STATE v. Jerry Co WILLIAMS.

No. 611P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of October 2005 by Defendant for "Petition for Writ of Certiorari":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of December 2005."
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5030 

For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2008 

Mr. LIPINSKI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CORINA 

4 DE CHALUP TURCINOVIC. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Corina de Chalup Turcinovic shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

12 of status to lawful permanent resident. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5030 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Corina de Chalup 

2 Turcinovic enters the United States before the filing dead3 line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to 

4 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 

5 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 

6 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Corina de Chalup Turcinovic, the Secretary of 

16 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, dur17 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num18 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

19 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

20 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

21 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail22 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

23 section 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5030 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Corina de Chalup 

2 Turcinovic shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be ac3 corded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigra4 tion and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
'use strict';
(function() {
	// CSR Setup
	var overrideCtx = {};
	overrideCtx.ListTemplateType = 100;
	overrideCtx.Templates = {};
	overrideCtx.Templates.Header = RenderHeader;
	overrideCtx.Templates.Item = RenderItem;
	overrideCtx.Templates.Footer = '';
	overrideCtx.Templates.OnPreRender = OnPreRender;
	overrideCtx.Templates.OnPostRender = OnPostRender;
	SPClientTemplates.TemplateManager.RegisterTemplateOverrides(overrideCtx);

	function GetUrl() {
		var url = _spPageContextInfo.siteAbsoluteUrl;
		return url;
	}

	function RenderHeader(ctx) {
		var header = RenderHeaderTemplate(ctx);
		var div = document.createElement('div');
		div.innerHTML = header;
		return '<div class="osc-inTheNews">' + header;
	}

	// Create each item
	function RenderItem(ctx) {
		var id = ctx.CurrentItem.ID;
		var title = ctx.CurrentItem['Title'];
		var url = ctx.CurrentItem['Name_x002f_URL_x0020_of_x0020_Ne'];
		var urlDesc = ctx.CurrentItem['Name_x002f_URL_x0020_of_x0020_Ne.desc'];
		var date = ctx.CurrentItem['Publication_x0020_Date'];
		var baseHtml =
			'<div class="card"> \
				<a href="{0}" target="_blank"> \
					<h6>{1}</h6> \
					<div class="pub">{2}</div> \
					<div class="date">{3}</div> \
				</a> \
			</div>';

		return String.format(baseHtml, url, urlDesc, title, date);
	}

	function OnPostRender(ctx) {}

	function OnPreRender(ctx) {
		var t = setInterval(function() {
			if (window.jQuery) {
				clearInterval(t);

				var InEditMode =
					document.getElementById('MSOLayout_InDesignMode').value == 1
						? true
						: false;
				if (!InEditMode) {
				}
			}
		}, 1);
		ctx.ListSchema.NoListItem = 'Add items to this list!';
	}
})();
# L_2012153DE.01003801.xml

| 14.6.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 153/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 153/38

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 176/2012 der Kommission vom 1. März 2012 zur Änderung der Anhänge B, C und D der Richtlinie 90/429/EWG des Rates hinsichtlich der tierseuchenrechtlichen Anforderungen in Bezug auf Brucellose und Aujeszky-Krankheit

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 61 vom 2. März 2012
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 61 vom 2. März 2012

Auf Seite 9, Anhang D, Formular „Muster-Veterinärbescheinigung für den Handel innerhalb der Union mit Sperma von Hausschweinen“ in den Erläuterungen, Teil I:

anstatt:

„Feld I.12: Herkunftsort ist die Besamungsstation [gemäß Artikel 2 der Richtlinie 90/429/EWG], in der das Sperma entnommen wurde.“

muss es heißen:

„Feld I.12: Herkunftsort ist die Besamungsstation [gemäß Artikel 2 der Richtlinie 90/429/EWG], aus der das Sperma versandt wurde.“

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7288

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT ANTHONY KELLY, JR., Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-94-43, CA-98-97-R) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Anthony Kelly, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Anthony Kelly, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Kelly , Nos. CR-94-43; CA-98-97-R (W.D. Va. June 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
'use strict';
(function() {
	// CSR Setup
	var overrideCtx = {};
	overrideCtx.ListTemplateType = 100;
	overrideCtx.Templates = {};
	overrideCtx.Templates.Header = RenderHeader;
	overrideCtx.Templates.Item = RenderItem;
	overrideCtx.Templates.Footer = '';
	overrideCtx.Templates.OnPreRender = OnPreRender;
	overrideCtx.Templates.OnPostRender = OnPostRender;
	SPClientTemplates.TemplateManager.RegisterTemplateOverrides(overrideCtx);

	function GetUrl() {
		var url = _spPageContextInfo.siteAbsoluteUrl;
		return url;
	}

	function RenderHeader(ctx) {
		var header = RenderHeaderTemplate(ctx);
		var div = document.createElement('div');
		div.innerHTML = header;
		return '<div class="osc-iconedList">' + header;
	}

	// Create each item
	function RenderItem(ctx) {
		var id = ctx.CurrentItem.ID;
		var title = ctx.CurrentItem['Title'];
		var url = ctx.CurrentItem['URL'];
		var desc = ctx.CurrentItem['Description'];
		var icon = ctx.CurrentItem['Icon'];
		var color = ctx.CurrentItem['Color'];
		var baseHtml =
			'<a class="card" href="{0}"> \
				<div class="icon {1}"> \
					<i class="fa-fw {2}"></i> \
				</div> \
				<div class="content"> \
					<h3>{3}</h3> \
					<div class="description">{4}</div> \
				</div> \
			</a>';

		return String.format(baseHtml, url, color, icon, title, desc);
	}

	function OnPostRender(ctx) {}

	function OnPreRender(ctx) {
		var t = setInterval(function() {
			if (window.jQuery) {
				clearInterval(t);

				var InEditMode =
					document.getElementById('MSOLayout_InDesignMode').value == 1
						? true
						: false;
				if (!InEditMode) {
					$('.osc-iconedList').parents('.ms-webpart-zone').addClass('osc-iconedZone');
					$('.osc-iconedList table[id*="Hero-"], .osc-iconedList table.ms-listviewtable, .osc-iconedZone iframe, .osc-iconedList>div:empty').remove();
				}
			}
		}, 1);
		ctx.ListSchema.NoListItem = 'Add items to this list!';
	}
})();
STATE of North Carolina v. Joe Earl WILSON.

No. 77P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Joe Earl Wilson, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 3rd day of February 2005 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Lenoir County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Seth PHILLIPS.

No. 459P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Julie Ramseur Lewis, Assistant Public Defender, for Timothy S. Phillips.

Jill Ledford Cheek, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 22nd day of August 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Atttorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of August 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."