alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
DECEMBER 31, 1997 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH 
PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE FOOTNOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,199
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,208
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    400,417
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               407,281
<PP&E>                                       2,478,855
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,268,136
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,821,893
<BONDS>                                      1,154,809
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,366,171
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,297,279)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,268,136
<SALES>                                        909,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               909,235
<CGS>                                        1,304,248
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,304,248
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,078,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,000,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,943,043)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,943,043)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.99)
        

</TABLE>
SCPR

- 24

- 0000 362

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

IN RE ALLISON WIDNEY , Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN IN GOOD STANDING

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign from the

practice of law in the State of Hawai ʻ i, filed by attorney

Allison Widney ( Widney ), pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of

the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai ʻ i (RSCH), but to retain

the paper license as a memento, as authorized by RSCH Rule

1.10(b), and the declarations submitted in support thereof, we

conclude that Widney has complied with the requirements of RSCH

Rule 1.10. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition to resign is

granted. Widney may retain the paper license as a memento.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g)

that Widney shall comply with the notice, declaration, and

record requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16(a), (b), (d) and (g). Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-24-0000362

24-JUN-2024

08:46 AM

Dkt. 10 OGP2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the

name of Widney , attorney number 11291 , from t he roll of

attorneys of the State of Hawai ʻ i, effective with the filing of

this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i, June 24 , 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ V la dimir P. Devens
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. ALAN C R

AIG R IC HARDS, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-50547

D.C . No. 2:05-c r-00070-GHK M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Philip S. Gutierre z , Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 21, 2015 * * B e fore : REINHAR

DT, LEAVY, a

nd B E R ZON, C irc uit Judge s. Ala n C ra ig Ric ha

rds a ppe a ls from the distric t

c o urt’ s judgm e nt a

nd c ha lle nge s the 36-m onth se nte n c e im pose d upon re voc at ion of supe rvise d re le a se . W e hav e jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . R ic ha rds c onte n ds tha

t the distric t c ourt e rre d by fa iling to ad dre ss his 

# FIL ED SEP 25 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).se nte nc ing a rgum e nts a

nd by im prope rly re ly ing on thene e d to punish to im pose se nte nc e . W e re vie w for pla in e rror, se eUnite d State s v . Vale nc ia-Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th C ir. 2010), a n d find none . The re c ord re fle c ts tha t the c ourt c onside re d R ic h ards’ argum e nts be fore im posing se nte nc e but sim

ply found the m unpe rsua sive . Se eRita v . Unite d State s , 551 U.S. 338, 358-59 (2007). The re c ord a lso re fle c ts tha

t the distric t c ourt did not ba se the se nte nc e prim arily on the ne e d to punish. Se eUnite d State s v . Simtob , 485 F.3d 1058, 1063 (9th C i r. 2007). R ic ha rds ne xt c onte nds tha

t his se nte nc e is substa

ntive ly unre a sona

ble . The distric t c o urt did not a

buse its disc re tion in im

posing R ic ha rds’ se nte n c e . Se eGall v . Unite d State s , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The 36-m onth se nte nc e is substa ntive ly re a s ona ble in light the

of the 18 U.S.C . § 3583(e ) se nte nc ing fa c tors a n d the tota lity of the c irc um s ta

nc e s , inc luding R

i c ha rds’ bre a c h e s of the c ourt’ s trust. Se e Gall , 552 U.S. a

t 51; Simtob , 485 F.3d a

t 1062-63 (a

t a re voc ation se nte nc ing, the distric t c o urt c an sa

nc tion a viola

tor for his bre a c h of trust). AFFIRM E D.

1 4 - 5 0 5 4 7 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MICHAEL S. TYLER,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-2412

LT Case No. 2001-CF-001529-A

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed April 28, 2023

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Lake County,

James R. Baxley, Judge.

Michael S. Tyler, Lowell, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Bonnie Jean 

Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Apellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals the trial court’s denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 3.800 motion for postconviction relief in Lake County Circuit Court 
2

Case No. 2001-CF-001529-A. We affirm the trial court’s order and caution 

Appellant that abusive, repetitive, malicious, or frivolous filings directed to 

Lake County Circuit Court Case No. 2001-CF-001529-A may result in 

sanctions such as a bar on pro se filing in this Court and referral to prison 

officials for disciplinary proceedings, which may include forfeiture of gain 

time. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019); State v. Spencer, 751 So. 2d 47 

(Fla. 1999).

AFFIRMED; WARNING ISSUED.

EDWARDS, SOUD, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.
STATE of North Carolina v. Deshune Ronrices BENNETT.

No. 101P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Nora Henry Hargrove, for Deshune R. Bennett.

Jill Ledford Cheek, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 16th day of February 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th day of February 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5165 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-Anilino-3-nitro-Nphenylbenzenesulphonamide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mr. BRADY of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-Anilino3-nitro-N-phenylbenzenesulphonamide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4–ANILINO-3-NITRO-N4 PHENYLBENZENESULPHONAMIDE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.52 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 4-Anilino-3-nitro-N-phenylbenzenesulphonamide) is 

8 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2011’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5165 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
BARHAM v. HAWK, et al.

No. 461PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 2, 2006.

Scott M. Stevenson, Kathleen K. Lucchesi, S. Frederick Winiker, III, Patricia Wilson Magee, John D. Kocher, Charlotte, for Hawk & Ear, Nose & Throat.

E. Hardy Lewis, Raleigh, for Gloria Barham.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th day of October 2005 by Plaintiff to Dismiss Appeal or in the Alternative to Deem Discretionary Review Improvidently Granted:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 2nd day of March 2006."
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of B&GFoods, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 4,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, David L. Wenner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andI, Robert C. Cantwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  David L. Wenner     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| David L. Wenner          |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| April 28, 2009      |   |

 

 
| /s/  Robert C. Cantwell  |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Cantwell       |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer |   |
| April 28, 2009      |   |

 

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officer of Dex Media West LLC (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on
    Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
    March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                



| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ GEORGE BURNETT                       
| |                                          
| | George Burnett                           
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer

Dated: May 21, 2004
(August 17, 2005)

#### In the Matter of Joann A. Baptiste et al., Respondents, v Ernest Emmanuel, Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[799 NYS2d 752]

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition designating Ernest Emmanuel as a candidate in a primary election to be held on September 13, 2005, for the nomination of the Democratic Party as its candidate for the public office of Member of the New York City Council, 45th Council District, the appeals are from (1) a final order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated August 1, 2005, which, upon the appellant’s failure to appear or answer, granted the petition, invalidated the designating petition, and directed the Board of Elections of the City of New York to remove the appellant’s name from the ballot and (2) an order of the same court (Harkavy, J.), dated August 5, 2005, which, after a hearing, denied the appellant’s motion to vacate the default.

Ordered that the appeal from the final order dated August 1, 2005, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as no appeal lies from an order made upon the default of an appealing party *(see*CPLR 5511; *Matter of Porscha Monique J.,*21 AD3d 415 [2005]; *Matter of Palazzo v Manassier,*286 AD2d 460, 461 [2001]); and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated August 5, 2005, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*504The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to vacate his default *(see Matter of Infante v Curley,*297 AD2d 396, 396 [2002]; *Matter of Diaz v Green,*275 AD2d 425, 426 [2000]; *cf. Matter of Bradley v Evans,*297 AD2d 392, 393 [2002]). The appellant failed to establish a reasonable excuse for his default *(see Matter of Infante v Curley, supra*at 396; *Matter of Diaz v Green, supra*at 426; *cf. Matter of Bradley v Evans, supra*at 393).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Prudenti, P.J., Adams, Luciano, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER (1)

Pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  created  by  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  the  following  certification  is  being  made to
accompany  Catskill  Litigation  Trust's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended March 31, 2007 ;

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Catskill  Litigation  Trust (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Joseph
E. Bernstein,  Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
          as amended; and

      (2) The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                    /s/ Joseph E. Bernstein
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Name: Joseph E. Bernstein
                                    Title: Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                    Date: May 14, 2007

      (1) A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906
          has been provided to Catskill Litigation Trust and will be retained by
          Catskill Litigation Trust and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
          Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 and is not  being  filed as part of the  Report  or as a  separate
disclosure document.
```
STATE v. GAINES.

No. COA04-1461.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 5, 2005.

Certification Date July 25, 2005.

Appeal from the Montgomery (01CRS51921).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
# C_2017332EN.01000701.xml

| 4.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/7

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision 2017/C 284/07 of 28 August 2017 on the publication in the Official Journal of the European Union of a request for amendment of a specification for a name in the wine sector referred to in Article 105 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Pla I Llevant (PDO))

Official Journal of the European Union

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 284 of 29 August 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 284 of 29 August 2017

(2017/C 332/06)

On page 9, point 5(b), ‘Maximum yields’:

for:

for:

‘11 000 hectolitres per hectare’,

read:

read:

‘11 000 kilograms per hectare’.

---
STROUP v. STROUP

No. S05F1377.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

January 30, 2006.

Judgment affirmed without opinion.
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, Gregory W. Hunt, Chief Financial Officer of Apollo Investment Corporation, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Apollo Investment Corporation;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


Date:August 12, 2020/s/ GREGORY W. HUNTGregory W. HuntChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
EXHIBIT 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AND INVESTMENTS OF
ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.

|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|Rofin-Sinar, Inc.                                    
|PRC Laser Corporation                                
|PRC Laser Europe N.V.                                
|Lee Laser, Inc.                                      
|Rofin-Sinar Technologies Europe S.L.                 
|Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH                               
|Rofin-Baasel Japan Corp.                             
|Rasant-Alcotec Beschichtungstechnik GmbH             
|CBL Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH                      
|Carl Baasel Lasertechnik GmbH & Co. KG               
|Rofin-Baasel, Inc.                                   
|Wegmann-Baasel Laser und elektrooptische Geraete GmbH
|Optoskand AB                                         
|PMB Elektronik GmbH                                  
|Rofin-Baasel Italiana S.r.l.                         
|Rofin-Baasel France S.A.                             
|Rofin-Sinar UK Ltd.                                  
|Rofin-Baasel UK Ltd.                                 
|Rofin-Baasel Benelux B.V.                            
|Rofin-Baasel Singapore PTE Ltd.                      
|Rofin-Baasel Espana S.L.                             
|DILAS Diodenlaser GmbH                               
|Rofin-Baasel Taiwan Ltd.                             
|Rofin-Baasel Korea Co., Ltd.                         
|Rofin-Baasel China Co., Ltd.                         
|Rofin-Baasel Canada Ltd.                             
|DILAS Diodelaser Inc.                                
|H2B
  Photonics GmbH                                 

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001020017
<NAME>                        ALLSTAR SYSTEMS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,581
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (249)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,090
<PP&E>                                           3,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,672)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,184
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,266
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,184
<SALES>                                        129,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,167
<CGS>                                          111,126
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  111,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,386
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 685
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,970
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,126
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,844
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,844
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52


</TABLE>