alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
54 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

LOUISIANA 

#32

$3.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#34

1.3% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$768

PER RESIDENT 

#37 

$1.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#22

37,571 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#25

$1.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 22%

Supplies and

Equipment: 38%

Research and

Development: 2%

Service: 38%

By Service 

Army

42%

Navy/Marines

36%

Air Force

9%

Other Defense

13%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 14%

Active Duty: 38%

National 

Guard: 30%

Civilian: 17%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

62%

Navy/Marines

11%

Air Force

26%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Thoma-Sea Marine Constructors

Placid Refining Co.

Nova Global Supply and Services

Swiftships

Phylway Construction LLC

Hornbeck Offshore Services

Amentum Services, Inc.

Great Lakes Dredge and Dock

Gravois Aluminum Boats

JGILS

(M = millions)

$197.4 M

$94.8 M

$64.7 M

$62.1 M

$59.6 M

$48.1 M

$47.6 M

$37.0 M

$32.6 M

$30.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.5 $2.2 $2.0

FY14

$1.9 $1.9

FY15

$1.6 $1.7

$0.8

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$1.9 BILLION 37,571

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Vernon

Bossier

Orleans

Rapides

East Baton Rouge

Tangipahoa

Iberville

Plaquemines

Lafayette

Calcasieu

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

7,860 1,430 96

5,035 1,522 150 

1,032 1,798 2,447

ND 412 1,436

150 108 602

ND 105 766

ND 41 788 

79 638 0 

29 47 332 

ND 42 313 

Reserve

24 

1,930

2,515

ND 

546

0 

ND 

0 

72 

120 

Total

9,410

8,637

7,792

ND 

1,406

ND 

ND 

717 

480 

ND 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

LOUISIANA 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Lafourche

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Vernon

Orleans

Lafourche

Plaquemines

Bossier

St. Tammany

West Baton Rouge

St. Mary

East Baton Rouge

Terrebonne

(M = millions)

$262.7 M

$248.9 M

$241.5 M

$125.6 M

$114.4 M

$105.5 M

$95.3 M

$84.0 M

$68.6 M

$43.1 M

Vernon

Bossier

Orleans

Rapides

East Baton Rouge

Plaquemines

Iberville

Tangipahoa

Lafayette

Caddo

$533.3 M

$505.3 M

$428.8 M

$71.5 M

$44.6 M

$41.0 M

$29.3 M

$27.0 M

$23.3 M

$16.1 M

Bossier

Vernon

East Baton Rouge

St. Tammany

Orleans

St. Mary

Terrebonne Plaquemines

West Baton Rouge

Bossier

Vernon

East Baton Rouge

Rapides

Iberville

Tangipahoa

Plaquemines

Orleans

Lafayette

Caddo

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 55

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Global Green Solutions Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
February 28, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date here of (the “report”), I, J. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 13th day of
April, 2009.







DOUG
FRATER


J. Douglas
Frater


Chief Executive
Officer
STATE v. JOHNSON.

No. COA05-598.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (03CRS13562, 03CRS13563, 03CRS47093)

Case without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. Markeith R. LAWRENCE.

No. 293A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 21, 2005.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Howard S. Boney, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of July 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Markeith Rodgers Lawrence) shall have up to and including the 31st day of August 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of July 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                                 
<ARTICLE>            5
<LEGEND>                                                                        
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  financial  statements of the Company for the period ended December
31,  1998 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such  financial
statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000        
<CURRENCY>                       U.S. Dollars 
                                                    
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                          1.0  
<CASH>                                28,706
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                         45,410
<ALLOWANCES>                           6,457
<INVENTORY>                           22,825
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      95,653
<PP&E>                                39,693
<DEPRECIATION>                         3,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       267,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 40,879
<BONDS>                              133,423
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                 151
<OTHER-SE>                            69,009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         267,463
<SALES>                              150,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     150,706
<CGS>                                 84,509
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         84,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       2,935
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    13,649
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        6,981
<INCOME-TAX>                           4,299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (36)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          127
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                              91
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.01
        


</TABLE>
- 350 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

311 Nebraska Reports

POPE v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

Cite as 311 Neb. 350

Colt M. Pope, appellant, v. Department 

of Motor Vehicles of the State 

of Nebraska, appellee.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed April 15, 2022. No. S-21-206.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Clay County: Stephen 

R. Illingworth, Judge. Former opinion modified. Motion for 

rehearing overruled.

T. Charles James, of Langvardt, Valle & James, P.C., L.L.O., 

for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Milissa JohnsonWiles for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller-Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, 

Papik, and Freudenberg, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by 

the appellant, Colt M. Pope, concerning our opinion in Pope 

v. Department of Motor Vehicles, 310 Neb. 971, 969 N.W.2d 

903 (2022).

We overrule the motion, but modify the opinion as follows:

In the analysis section, under the subheading “OTHER 

ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR,” we modify the fourth paragraph to add as the final sentence the following: “We make 

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

06/03/2022 09:10 AM CDT
- 351 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

311 Nebraska Reports

POPE v. DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES

Cite as 311 Neb. 350

no comment on any prohibitions or obligations under Neb. Rev. 

Stat. § 84-914(6) (Reissue 2014), as Pope has not assigned as 

error, nor has he argued he was prejudiced by, any purported 

violation of that statute.”

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

Former opinion modified.

Motion for rehearing overruled.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**INFRASOURCE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InfraSource Services, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), David R. Helwig, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terence R. Montgomery, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ David R. Helwig     |                    | /s/ Terence R. Montgomery |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
| David R. Helwig         | Terence R. Montgomery   |
| Chief Executive Officer | Chief Financial Officer |
| Date: June 11, 2004     | Date: June 11, 2004     |

 

 

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5245 

To suspend temporarily the duty on acid black 107. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on acid black 107. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACID BLACK 107. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.61 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 acid black 107) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION



I, Joseph D. Borgerding, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 15, 2006



/s/ Joseph D. Borgerding

Joseph D. Borgerding

Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard Armstrong, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Strong Technical
Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the registrant, including its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
           report is being prepared;

     b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
           and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
           of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)    presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
           evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a)    all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
           record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
           identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
           internal controls; and

     b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
           controls.

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 1, 2005

/s/ Richard Armstrong
---------------------------
    Richard Armstrong,
    Chief Executive Officer
    and Chief Financial Officer
# L_2017150EN.01001901.xml

| 14.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 150/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 150/19

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1821 of 6 October 2016 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 294 of 28 October 2016
  )

On page 207, in the Annex, in the text replacing Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87, in Part Two, in Section V, in Chapter 27, in the third paragraph of additional note 2(f):

for:

‘The term “diluted colour C” means the colour of a product, as determined by the ISO 2049 method (equivalent to the ASTM D 1500 method), after one part of such product has been mixed with 100 parts by volume of xylene, toluene or another suitable solvent. The colour must be determined immediately after dilution.’,

read:

‘The term “diluted colour C” means the colour of a product, as determined by the ISO 2049 method (equivalent to the ASTM D 1500 method), after one part of the product has been made up to 100 parts by volume with xylene, toluene or another suitable solvent. The colour must be determined immediately after dilution.’.

---
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00180-CR

______________________________

RONI A. MCKINNEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 124th Judicial District Court

Gregg County, Texas

Trial Court No. 35845-B

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Roni A. McKinney, appellant, has filed with this Court a motion to dismiss her appeal. The

motion is signed by McKinney and by her counsel in compliance with TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). As

authorized by Rule 42.2, we grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

Bailey C. Moseley

Justice

Date Submitted: November 25, 2008

Date Decided: November 26, 2008

Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm

 

Board of Directors

MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registrationstatements on Form S-8 (No. 333-20833, No. 333-20829, and No. 333-37642)of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. of our report dated October 14, 2005,with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, comprehensive income, changes in capital and cash flows for theyear ended December 31, 2004, which report appears in the December 31,2005, annual report on Form 10-K of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc.

 

 
| KPMG LLP             |   |
|----------------------|--------|
|                 |
|                 |
| Denver, Colorado     |
| March 14,  2006 |

 

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5040 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fluopicolide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2008 

Mr. COSTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fluopicolide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLUOPICOLIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2,6-Dichloro-N-{2-[3-chloro5-(trifluoromethyl)-2- 

pyridinyl]ethyl}benzamide 

(CAS No. 239110–15–7) 

(provided for in subheading 

2933.39.21) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HR 5040 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
INSURANCE COMPANY v. BOURLON.

No. 551A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 12, 2005.

W. Russell Congleton, for John M. Bourlon.

Gary S. Parsons, David S. Wisz, Raleigh, for Nationwide Ins. Co.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of October 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (John M. Bourlon) shall have up to and including the 21st day of November 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of October 2005."
exv10w1



 





Exhibit 10.1




Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Program





	1.	 	An annual retainer in the amount of $40,000 for each non-employee director.
	 
	2.	 	A meeting fee of $1,000 for each Board or Committee meeting attended in person or
telephonically, except that each member of the Audit Committee shall receive $1,500 rather
than $1,000 for each Audit Committee meeting attended in person or telephonically.
	 
	3.	 	An annual fee of $2,500 for each member of the Audit Committee, provided that the chair
of the Audit Committee shall receive $15,000 rather than $2,500 for such Committee service.
	 
	4.	 	An annual fee of $2,500 for the chair of each Committee (other than the Audit
Committee).
	 
	5.	 	An annual restricted stock award of 1,500 shares to be made following the certification
of the director election results from each annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders to
each non-employee director who then holds office, subject to stockholder approval of an
amendment to the Company’s 2003 Incentive Stock Plan (the “2003 Plan”) to provide for
restricted stock awards for directors. Each restricted stock award will be made pursuant
to a restricted stock agreement adopted pursuant to the 2003 Plan (or an alternative plan
upon the expiration of the 2003 Plan) providing that each award will vest one-third on the
date of grant and one-third on each of the first and second anniversaries of the date of
the grant. Vesting will be accelerated upon the director’s retirement or the failure of
the director to be re-nominated for election to the Board upon expiration of the director’s
current term in office. Each director will be entitled to receive any cash dividends paid
with respect to shares subject to a restricted stock award, regardless of whether the award
is fully vested.
	 
	6.	 	A restricted stock award of 1,500 shares for each new non-employee director when the
director joins the Board, subject to stockholder approval of an amendment to the 2003 Plan
to provide for restricted stock awards for directors. The terms of this restricted stock
award will match those of the annual restricted stock award described above.
	 
	7.	 	Reimbursement of expenses incurred by each director in attending meetings.