alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2 (b)
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
        Center Tower
        650 Town Center Drive
        Costa Mesa, CA  92626




                 INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT

                                
A.   The Board of Directors
Option One Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about Option One Mortgage
Corporation's (the Company) compliance with the minimum servicing
standards identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of
America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers
(USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996.
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with those
minimum servicing standards.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established
by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about
the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing standards and
performing such other procedures, as we considered necessary in
the circumstances.  We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not
provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with
the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Option One Mortgage
Corporation complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing
standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


\s\ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


February 18, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5455 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5455

 To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make nondischargeable 
    debts for personal injuries that result in permanent disability.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2008

Mr. Burton of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make nondischargeable 
    debts for personal injuries that result in permanent disability.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    Section 523(a) of title 11, the United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (18) by striking ``or'' at the end,
            (2) in paragraph (19) by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or'', and
            (3) by inserting after paragraph (19) the following:
            ``(20) for a personal injury that results in a permanent 
        disability.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Effective Date.--Except as provided in subsection (b), this Act 
and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect on the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application of Amendments.--The amendments made by this Act 
shall apply only with respect to cases commenced under title 11 of the 
United States Code on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN RE A.D.P.

No. COA05-786.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Robeson (04J212).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
STATE v. ROUTH.

No. COA05-381.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Randolph (02CRS57384, 02CRS52423 03CRS58380).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 10.5

    SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.
 LOAN AGREEMENT, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND 10% CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

      THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS,
INC. LOAN AGREEMENT, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND 10% CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY
NOTE (the "Second Amendment") is made and entered into as of July 26, 2005, by
and among NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Maker")
and Toucan Capital Fund II, L.P. (the "Holder"). This Second Amendment amends
the Note (as defined below).

                                    RECITALS

A. Section 17.6 of that certain Amended and Restated Northwest Biotherapeutics,
Inc. Loan Agreement, Security Agreement and 10% Convertible, Secured Promissory
Note, in the principal amount of $50,000.00 amended and restated as of July 30,
2004 and originally issued on February 2, 2004, by and between the Maker and the
Holder in the form attached to this Second Amendment as Exhibit A and as amended
by that First Amendment To Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. Loan Agreement,
Security Agreement and 10% Convertible, Secured Promissory Note in the form
attached to this Second Amendment as Exhibit B (as so amended the "Note"),
states that any provision of such note may be amended or waived in writing by
the Holder and the Maker; and

B. The Maker and the Holder wish to amend the Note as provided below.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended to provide that the Maturity Date is
November 1, 2005.

2. All other terms and conditions of the Note shall be unaffected hereby and
remain in full force and effect.

3. This Second Amendment shall be governed by and construed under the laws of
the state of Delaware without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws
of the State of Delaware or any other state.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

                                        1

<PAGE>



      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this SECOND AMENDMENT
TO AMENDED AND RESTATED NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. LOAN AGREEMENT, SECURITY
AGREEMENT AND 10% CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE as of the date first
above written.

MAKER:

NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

By:_________________________________
Name:_______________________________
Title:______________________________

HOLDER:

Toucan Capital Fund II, L.P.

By:________________________________
   Linda Powers, Managing Director

                                        2
STATE v. Kenneth Lee BOYD.

No. 547A88-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 29, 2005.

A. Danielle Marquis, Assistant Attorney General, Belinda J. Foster, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of November 2005 by Defendant for Stay of Execution:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of November 2005."
OFFICE OF LOCAL DEFENSE COMMUNITY COOPERATION

Quick-Start Guide for OLDCC 

Grantees New to EADS II

Hello! Welcome to EADS II

Economic Adjustment Data System II (EADS II) provides seamless interface between 

OLDCC and the grantee community. We are excited to have you aboard and look forward 

to working together through our new system.

1

2

3

CONTACT

If you need to contact OLDCC, use one 

of these two options on the website.

Click the Our Programs drop-down 

menu, then click Program Overview. 

Select the desired program type and use 

the contact information at the bottom.

Or simply click Contact Us.

EVALUATION

Once you have submitted your inquiry 

it will be evaluated by OLDCC staff. If 

the program director can justify moving 

forward with your proposal, you will be 

contacted by an OLDCC Project Manager. 

If declined, you will be provided a 

response by the Program Director.

INVITATION

If it is determined that OLDCC is 

authorized to provide federal financial 

assistance for your proposal, your assigned 

project manager will send you login 

credentials. You will be sent an email 

from the system and a link to the OLDCC 

Grants portal.

4 ACCESS

The OLDCC Grants Portal is configured 

to work across all browsers (to include 

Safari), however a browser may not 

recognize the credentials of the OLDCC 

Grants Portal. This is because the 

website’s certificates are issued by 

DoD and not by a civilian organization. 

In this case you will have to add the 

“https://grants.oldcc.gov/s_Login.jsp” as 

a trusted site to your internet browser. 

The specific steps may vary from browser 

to browser, but the concept is the same. 

Below are the steps for Mozilla FirefoxTM.

STEP 1: Click Advanced

STEP 2: Click Add Exception

STEP 3: Click Confirm

STEP 4: Enter Password

U.S. Department of Defense

Office of Local Defense

Community Cooperation OFFICE OF LOCAL DEFENSE COMMUNITY COOPERATION

HELPING COMMUNITIES HELP THEMSELVE

OLDCC S

USING MOZILLA FIREFOXTM
COMMONWEALTH of Virginia, Appellant, v. Holly Jo SOUTH, Appellee.

Record No. 060138.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

June 8, 2006.

From the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Court of Appeals No. 2209-04-1.

Upon the petition of the Commonwealth of Virginia and a review of the record, pleadings and the argument of appellant's counsel, the Court finds no merit to assignments of error I and II and refuses the petition as to those assignments of error. The appellee, however, concedes that appellant is correct as to its third assignment of error, which reads as follows:

III. Assuming *arguendo* that the trial court erred in convicting the defendant *319under the felony provisions of the assault and battery statute, the Court of Appeals erred in remanding the case for a new trial, instead of simply remanding the case for a new sentencing proceeding on the lesser included offense for which the petitioner was validly convicted.

Accordingly, the petition is granted as to assignment of error III, that part of the judgment of the Court of Appeals remanding the case for a new trial is reversed, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instruction to remand to the trial court for a new sentencing proceeding on the lesser-included offense of assault and battery, a Class 1 misdemeanor.

Justices KEENAN and LEMONS did not participate in the consideration of this case.

This order shall be published in the Virginia Reports and shall be certified to the Court of Appeals of Virginia and the Circuit Court of the City of Norfolk.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 7, 2018

No. 04-18-00137-CV

IN RE STONEBROOK MANOR, SNF, LLC, d/b/a Advanced Rehabilitation 

Healthcare of Live Oak, LLC f/k/a Stonebrook Manor at Broadway

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

On March 6, 2018, relator filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus complaining of the trial 

court’s February 15, 2018 “Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Overrule Objections and 

Compel Production of All Responsive Documents From the Defendant” (the “order”). Relator 

also filed a Motion to Stay. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the 

mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The 

respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus 

in this court no later than March 23, 2018. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 52.4. 

Relator’s request for a stay is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The 

portion of the trial court’s order overruling relator’s objections to certain requests for production 

and interrogatories and requiring relator to provide responsive documents and responses to those 

discovery requests by 5:00 p.m. on March 15, 2018 is STAYED pending final resolution of the 

petition for writ of mandamus. The portion of the trial court’s order requiring responses by 5:00 

p.m. on March 15, 2018 to discovery requests for which relator’s objections were either 

“withdrawn” or “sustained” is NOT STAYED. 

Relator’s request that all proceedings in the underlying case be stayed pending final 

resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017-CI-19392, styled Janet Baxter, As Next Friend of Ella Baxter, An 

Incapacitated Person v. Stonebrook Manor SNF, LLC d/b/a Advanced Rehabilitation Healthcare of Live Oak, LLC 

f/k/a Stonebrook Manor at Broadway, pending in the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the 

Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding.
It is so ORDERED on March 7, 2018.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of
the Smith Barney Arizona Municipals Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements 
of Smith Barney Arizona Municipals Fund Inc. (the "Fund") for 
the year ended May 31, 1998, we considered its internal control, 
including control activities for safeguarding securities, in 
order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of 
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply 
with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on 
the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and 
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, 
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the 
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally, 
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's 
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes 
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted 
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of 
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition. 

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or 
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection 
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is 
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of 
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and 
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily 
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be 
material weaknesses under standards established by the American 
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness 
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of 
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively 
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts that 
would be material in relation to the financial statements being 
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by 
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned 
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the internal 
control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding 
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined 
above. 

This report is intended solely for the information and use of 
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the 
Securities and Exchange Commission.



July 15, 1998
STATE v. David Franklin HURT.

No. 192A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 2, 2005.

Lisa Bradley Dawson, Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney Generals, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hurt.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of September 2005 by Attorney General to Stay Issuance of Mandate:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 2nd day of September 2005."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5272 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Corvus herbicide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To reduce temporarily the duty on Corvus herbicide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORVUS HERBICIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5272 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Product mixtures containing 

Thiencarbazone-methyl 

(Methyl 4-({[(3-methoxy-4- 

methyl-5-oxo-4,5-dihydro-1H1,2,4-triazol-1- 

yl)carbonyl]amino}sulfonyl)- 

5-methylthiophene-3- 

carboxylate) & Isoxaflutole(5- 

Cyclospropyl-4-(2- 

Methylsulfonyl-4- 

Trifluoromethylbenxoyl)Isoxazole) & 

Cyprosulfamide(N-({4- 

[(Cyclopropylamino)carbonyl]phenyl}sulfonyl)- 

2-methoxybenzamide) (CAS 

Nos. 317815–83–1, 141112– 

29–0, 221667–31–8) (provided for in subheading 

3808.93.15) ........................... 1.9% No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
STATE v. Alexander C. POLKE.

No. 412A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 9, 2006.

William P. Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, William Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of February 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Alexander Charles Polke) shall have up to and including the 8th day of March 2006 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By *609order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of February 2006."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Padraic Keating, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 646]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated May 21, 2001 *(People v Keating,*283 AD2d 589 [2001]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered December 13, 1996.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller and Luciano, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.1****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer**I, James H. Long, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of INX Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 18, 2006 /s/ JAMES H. LONG   James H. Long, Chief Executive Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5420 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Resmethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2008 

Mr. ETHERIDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Resmethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.83 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Resmethrin) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and in7 serting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS