40182 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2022 / Notices 

16See, e.g., Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Changed Circumstances Reviews, and Revocation of 

the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 

in Part, 86 FR 71615 (December 17, 2021); see also 

Certain Pasta from Italy: Final Results of 

Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances 

Review and Revocation, In Part, 76 FR 27634 (May 

12, 2011); and Stainless Steel Bar from the United 

Kingdom: Notice of Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review and Revocation of Order, in 

Part, 72 FR 65706 (November 23, 2007). 

1See Monosodium Glutamate from the People’s 

Republic of China, and the Republic of Indonesia: 

Antidumping Duty Orders; and Monosodium 

Glutamate from the Republic of China: Amended 

Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value, 79 FR 70505 (November 26, 2014) (Order). 

2See Monosodium Glutamate from the Republic 

of Indonesia: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020, 87 FR 18767 

(March 31, 2022). 

3See PT. Daesang’s Letter, ‘‘Monosodium 

Glutamate (MSG) from Indonesia: Request to 

Initiate a Successor-in-Interest Changed 

Circumstances Review for PT. Daesang Ingredients 

Indonesia,’’ dated March 10, 2022 (PT. Daesang’s 

CCR Request). 

4 Id. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Initiation and Preliminary Results of the 

Changed Circumstances Review of the 

Antidumping Duty Order on Monosodium 

Glutamate from the Republic of Indonesia: PT. 

Daesang Ingredients Indonesia,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice 

(Preliminary Decision Memorandum). 

6See 19 CFR 351.216(c). 

7See 19 CFR.351.216(d). 

8See PT. Daesang’s CCR Request at Exhibit 2. The 

specific effective date of the name change is 

business proprietary information and is not 

available for public summary. 

the date determined by the 

administering authority.’’ Commerce’s 

general practice is to instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

liquidate without regard to ADs and 

CVDs, and to refund any estimated ADs 

and CVDs on, all unliquidated entries of 

the merchandise covered by a 

revocation that are not covered by the 

final results of an administrative review 

or automatic liquidation.16 Consistent 

with this practice, we are applying the 

final results of these CCRs to all 

unliquidated entries of the merchandise 

covered by the revocations which have 

been entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

January 1, 2021, for the CVD Order. 

Instructions to CBP 

Because we determine that there are 

changed circumstances that warrant the 

revocation of the Orders, in part, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate without 

regard to ADs and CVDs, and to refund 

any estimated ADs and CVDs on, all 

unliquidated entries of the merchandise 

covered by this partial revocation on or 

after April 30, 2021, for purposes of the 

AD Order, and January 1, 2021, for 

purposes of the CVD Order. 

Commerce intends to issue 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of 

these final results of CCRs in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These final results of CCRs and this 

notice are published in accordance with 

sections 751(b) and 777(i) of the Act, 

and 19 CFR 351.216, 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(3), and 19 CFR 351.222. 

Dated: June 27, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14299 Filed 7–5–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–560–826] 

Monosodium Glutamate From the 

Republic of Indonesia: Notice of 

Initiation and Preliminary Results of 

Changed Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request for a 

changed circumstances review (CCR), 

the U.S. Department of Commerce 

(Commerce) is initiating a CCR of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

monosodium glutamate (MSG) from the 

Republic of Indonesia (Indonesia). We 

preliminarily determine that PT. 

Daesang Ingredients Indonesia (PT. 

Daesang) is the successor-in-interest to 

PT. Miwon Indonesia (PT. Miwon). 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable July 6, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3586. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 26, 2014, Commerce 

published the AD order on MSG from 

Indonesia in the Federal Register.1 In 

the most recent administrative review of 

the Order covering the period November 

1, 2019, through October 31, 2020, PT. 

Miwon was assigned the cash deposit 

rate of 1.60 percent as a mandatory 

company respondent.2

On March 10, 2022, PT. Daesang 

requested that Commerce conduct an 

expedited CCR to find that PT. Daesang 

is the successor-in-interest to PT. 

Miwon due to a change in the 

company’s name (i.e., PT. Miwon to PT. 

Daesang).3 In its submission, PT. 

Daesang addressed the factors 

Commerce analyzes with respect to 

successor-in-interest determinations in 

the AD context and provided supporting 

documentation.4 Commerce received no 

comments from interested parties on PT. 

Daesang’s CCR Request. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is MSG from Indonesia. For a full 

description of the merchandise covered 

by the scope of the Order, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.5

Initiation of Changed Circumstances 

Review 

Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR 351.216, Commerce will 

conduct a CCR upon receipt of a request 

from an interested party for a review of 

an AD order that shows changed 

circumstances sufficient to warrant a 

review of the order.6 The information 

submitted by PT. Daesang supporting its 

claim that PT. Daesang is the successorin-interest to PT. Miwon demonstrates 

changed circumstances sufficient to 

initiate a review.7

The information submitted by PT. 

Daesang demonstrates that its request is 

based solely on a change in the name of 

the company from ‘‘PT. Miwon 

Indonesia’’ to ‘‘PT. Daesang Ingredients 

Indonesia,’’ effective November 2021.8

Moreover, the evidence submitted in 

support of PT. Daesang’s request 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 128 / Wednesday, July 6, 2022 / Notices 40183 

9See 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii). 10See, e.g., Certain Frozen Freshwater Shrimp 

from India: Notice of Initiation and Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Changed 

Circumstances Review, 85 FR 57192 (September 15, 

2020) (Hyson CCR Initiation and Preliminary 

Results), unchanged in Certain Frozen Freshwater 

Shrimp from India: Notice of Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 

85 FR 70584 (November 5, 2020) (Hyson CCR Final 

Results). 

11 Id. 

12See, e.g., Heavy Walled Rectangular Welded 

Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes from Turkey: Notice 

of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review, 86 FR 70443 (December 10, 

2021) at 86 70444, unchanged in Heavy Walled 

Rectangular Welded Carbon Steel Pipes and Tubes 

from Turkey: Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review, 87 FR 3763 (January 25, 

2022). 

13 Id. 

14See, e.g., Hyson CCR Initiation and Preliminary 

Results, unchanged in Hyson CCR Final Results. 

15Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 

CFR 351.310(c) to alter the time limit for requesting 

a hearing. 

16Commerce is exercising its discretion under 19 

CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) to alter the time limit for the 

filing of case briefs. 

17See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

18See 19 CFR 351.303(b). 

19See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

demonstrates that PT. Daesang is 

otherwise the same business entity as 

PT. Miwon. Therefore, in accordance 

with the regulation referenced above, 

Commerce is initiating a CCR to 

determine whether PT. Daesang is the 

successor-in-interest to PT. Miwon. 

Preliminary Results of the Changed 

Circumstances Review 

When Commerce concludes that 

expedited action is warranted, it may 

publish the notice of initiation and 

preliminary results of a CCR 

concurrently.9 Commerce has combined 

the notice of initiation and preliminary 

results in successor-in-interest cases 

when sufficient documentation has been 

provided supporting the request to make 

a preliminary determination.10 In this 

instance, because we have information 

on the record to support the request for 

a preliminary determination and no 

other interested party submitted 

comments, we find that expedited 

action is warranted, and we are 

combining the notice of initiation and 

the notice of preliminary results of 

review, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(3)(ii). 

In a CCR, Commerce generally 

consider a company to be the successor 

to another company for AD cash deposit 

purposes if the operations of the 

successor are not materially dissimilar 

from those of its predecessor.11 In 

making this determination, Commerce 

examines a number of factors including, 

but not limited to, changes in: (1) 

management; (2) production facilities; 

(3) suppliers; and (4) customer base.12

While no single factor or combination of 

factors is dispositive, Commerce will 

generally consider one company to be 

the successor to another if its resulting 

operations are essentially the same as 

that of its predecessor.13 Thus, if the 

evidence demonstrates that, with 

respect to the production and sale of the 

subject merchandise, the new company 

operates as the same business entity as 

the prior company, Commerce will 

assign the new company the cash 

deposit rate of its predecessor.14

In its CCR request, PT. Daesang 

provided evidence demonstrating that 

its operations are not materially 

dissimilar from those of PT. Miwon. 

Based on the record, we preliminarily 

determine that PT. Daesang is the 

successor-in-interest to PT. Miwon. For 

a complete discussion of the 

information that PT. Daesang provided, 

including business proprietary 

information and the complete successorin-interest analysis, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary 

Determination Memorandum is 

included as the appendix to this notice. 

The Preliminary Determination 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Public Comment 

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 14 days of publication of 

this notice, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.310(c).15 Interested parties may 

submit case briefs no later than 14 days 

after the date of publication of this 

notice.16 Rebuttal briefs, limited to 

issues raised in the case briefs, may be 

filed no later than seven days after the 

deadline for case briefs, in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties who 

submit case or rebuttal briefs in this 

CCR are requested to submit with each 

argument: (1) a statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.17 All 

comments are to be filed electronically 

using ACCESS, and must be served on 

interested parties. An electronically 

filed document must be received 

successfully in its entirety by ACCESS 

by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the day it 

is due.18 Please note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.19

Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), 

we will issue the final results of this 

CCR no later than 270 days after the 

date on which this review was initiated, 

or within 45 days of publication of these 

preliminary results in the Federal 

Register if all parties agree to this 

preliminary finding. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

initiation and preliminary results notice 

in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) 

and 777(i) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.216, 

and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3). 

Dated: June 28, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Initiation and Preliminary Results of the 

Changed Circumstances Review 

V. Success-in-Interest Determination 

VI. Conclusion 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–14283 Filed 7–5–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–042] 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Expedited Sunset Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on stainless steel sheet and 

strip (SSSS) from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) would be likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the levels indicated in the 

‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

DATES: Applicable July 6, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office III, Enforcement and 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1