alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOcean Facts

# Who first charted the Gulf Stream?

## **Benjamin Franklin** was the first person to chart the Gulf Stream.

Alexander Agassiz, a preeminent oceanographer of the 19th century,  attributed the first scientific basis for exploring the Gulf Stream to  American statesman Benjamin Franklin.  Franklin published this map of  the Gulf Stream in 1769, 200 years before a submersible named after him  drifted below the surface to study this river in the ocean. 

Although first observed in 1513 by Ponce de Leon, the Gulf  Stream was not charted until the early 1770s by Benjamin Franklin.

In 1843, the United States Coast Survey, NOAA’s earliest  “ancestor,” set out to study the Gulf Stream in more detail. They wanted to  determine the depth of the water, the temperature of the water at different  depths, the characteristics of the ocean bottom, the direction and velocity of the currents at different depths, and the extent of plant and animal life. Their  early observations led them to discover features such as cool and warm water  banding, as well as the “Charleston Bump.”

###### **Search** Our Facts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - A Profile of the Charleston Bump

**Last updated:**   01/20/23**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

1. Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-39174) of Steiner Leisure Limited,
2. Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-73363) of Steiner Leisure Limited,
3. Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-76436) of Steiner Leisure Limited,
4. Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-109283) of Steiner Leisure Limited,
5. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-39927) pertaining to the Steiner Leisure Limited Amended and Restated 1996 Share Option and Incentive Plan,
6. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-52343) pertaining to the Steiner Leisure Limited Non-Employee Directors Share Option Plan and
7. Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-127061) pertaining to the Steiner Leisure Limited 2004 Equity Incentive Plan;

and in the related prospectuses of our reports dated March 11, 2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Steiner Leisure Limited and subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Steiner Leisure Limited and subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Ernst & Young LLP
Certified Public Accountants

Miami, Florida
March 11, 2010
HLD

- 001 (October 2010) NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10

- 2605

___________

GREGORY T. REDMOND

, Appellant

v.

FOUR SEASON HOTEL

____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 10

- cv

- 02311) District Judge: Honorable Norma L. Shapiro

____________________________________
Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B ) or Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 October 29, 2010 Before: McKEE, Chief Judge , ALDISERT and WEIS, Circuit Judges

( Opinion filed : February 14, 2011 )

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM.

In May 2010, Gregory T. Redmond com menced this action by filing a pro

se complaint against the Four Seasons Hotel in Philadelphia, claiming that

, on March 3,

2006, a security guard prevented Redmond from entering the hotel lobby because of his

race. Redmond sought damages for an alleged vi olat ion of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1982

.2 The District Court granted in forma pauperis status and dismissed the complaint sua

sponte under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), noting that the suit is barred under the doctrine

of res judicata and also time

- barred under the statute of limitations. Redmond appeals.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review is plenary.

Allah v. Seiverling , 229 F.3d 220, 223 (3d Cir. 2000). We must dismiss an in forma

pauperis appeal if we determine that it is “frivolous or malicious.” 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(i); see Neitzke v. Williams , 490 U.S. 319, 324

- 25 (1989).

The District Court correctly concluded that this suit is barred. Redmond

raised precisely the same allegation against the Four Seasons Hotel in a prio r suit, which

the District Court dismissed on the merits. See E.D. Pa. Civ

. No. 09

- cv

- 0 5698 . In

addition, the District Court denied Redmond’s motion for reconsideration in the prior suit

and expressly rejected the merits of his claims under §§ 1981 and 1 982 for failure to state

a claim upon which relief can be granted. Given the prior dismissal on the merits, the

doctrine of res judicata bars Redmond “ from initiating a second suit against the same

adversary based on the same ‘ cause of action ’ as the firs t suit. ” Duhaney v. Att’y Gen.

, --

- F.3d

--- , 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19131 , at *16 (3d Cir. Sept. 14, 2010) . In addition, as

fully explained by the District Court, Redmond’s claims are plainly time

- barred under the

statute of limitations. Accordingly, we will dismiss this appeal under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of SeaChange International, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin M. Bisson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kevin M. Bisson                                                                              
|Kevin M. Bisson                                                                                  
|Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President,Finance and Administration, Treasurer andSecretary

April 13, 2007
**Exhibit 32.0**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Bristol West Holdings, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),we, James R. Fisher and Craig E. Eisenacher, Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

August 13,2004

 
| /s/  JAMES R. FISHER       |   | /s/  CRAIG E. EISENACHER                |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| James R. Fisher                      |   | Craig E. Eisenacher                               |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
HOKE COUNTY v. STATE and State Board.

No. 530PA02.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 30, 2004.

Grayson E. Kelley, Edwin W. Speas, Senior Deputy Attorney Generals, Thomas J. Ziko, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State and State Board of Education.

Robert H. Tiller, Melanie Black Dubis, Raleigh, for Hoke County et al.

Ann L. Majestic, Raleigh, for Ingram et al.

Ann W. McColl, Raleigh, for N.C. Assoc. of School Admin.

Seth H. Jaffe, Raleigh, for ACLU of N.C. Legal Foundation.

Sheria Reid, Carlene McNulty, Gregory C. Malhoit, Raleigh, for Counsel for Rural School and North Carolina Justice and Community Development Center.

Deborah Greenblatt, for Carolina Legal Assistance.

John Charles Boger, for UNC Law Center for Civil Rights.

John Gresham, S. Luke Largess, Charlotte, for North Carolina Association of Educators.

Romallus O. Murphy, Greensboro, for the NC NAACP.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of October 2003 by Plaintiff-Intervenors to Amend Record and Correct Caption:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of July 2004."
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 18, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Marc L. Reisch                                                                
|                      |  |  |  | Marc L. Reisch President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 38758]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13928]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than July 14, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. William C. Martin 2022 Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, William 
C. Martin as trustee, both of Ann Arbor, Michigan; to become members of 
the Martin Family Control Group, a group acting in concert, to acquire 
voting shares of Arbor Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of Bank of Ann Arbor, both of Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-13928 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 21

|SUBSIDIARIES OF STEINER LEISURE LIMITED
|---------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                     
|Owned by Steiner Leisure Limited       
|Cosmetics Limited                      
|                                       
|Steiner Spa Asia Limited               
|                                       
|Steiner Spa Resorts Limited            
|                                       
|Steiner Transocean Limited             
|                                       
|Steiner U.S. Holdings, Inc.            
|                                       
|Owned by Steiner U.S. Holdings, Inc.   
|Florida Luxury Spa Group, Inc.         
|                                       
|Mandara PSLV, LLC                      
|                                       
|Mandara Spa (Hawaii) LLC               
|                                       
|Steiner Beauty Products, Inc.          
|                                       
|Steiner Education Group, Inc.          
|                                       
|Steiner Management Services LLC        
|                                       
|Steiner Spa Resorts (Connecticut), Inc.
|                                       
|Steiner Spa Resorts (Nevada), Inc.     
|                                       
|Owned by Steiner Education Group, Inc. 
|FCNH, Inc.                             
|                                       
|Mid-Atlantic Massage Therapy, Inc.     
|                                       
|Owned by Steiner Transocean Limited    
|Mandara (Cruise I) LLC                 
|                                       
|Mandara (Cruise II) LLC                
|                                       
|Owned by Steiner Spa Asia Limited      
|Mandara Spa Asia Limited               
|                                       
|Owned by Steiner Spa Limited           
|Mandara Spa LLC                        
|                                       

Owned by Cosmetics Limited

|Elemis Limited | United Kingdom
|-------------- | --------------
Exhibit 10(D)



 






EXHIBIT 10(d)




2004-1 AMENDMENT TO THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY DIRECTOR

DEFFERED FEE PLAN

(1997 AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT)




     This 2004-1 Amendment to The Sherwin-Williams Company Director Deferred Fee Plan (1997
Amendment and Restatement) (the “Plan”) is made effective as of December 31, 2004.



WITNESSETH:




     WHEREAS, The Sherwin-Williams Company (the “Company”) established the Plan effective February
20, 1991;



     WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 13 of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company retains the
right to amend the Plan at any time in whole or in part; and



     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company wishes to amend the Plan to freeze all further
participation and contributions to the Plan;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective December 31, 2004 to add the following
Addendum 2004-1:



ADDENDUM –
2004-1




     Pursuant to Article XII of the Plan, notwithstanding any other provisions of the Plan to
the contrary, for all periods on and after December 31, 2004: (1) the obligation of the Company to
make any future contributions shall cease; (2) no further deferrals, whether contributed by the
Company or Participants, shall be permitted; and (3) no persons who were not Participants on
December 31, 2004 shall be eligible to become Participants. In addition, no “material
modification”, as such term is defined in The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 or any regulations
or authority issued thereunder (the “Act”), shall be made to the Plan.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to the action of its Board of Directors at a meeting held the
20th day of July, 2005, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed effective
December 31, 2004 by its duly authorized officer.



	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ATTEST/WITNESS:	 	THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	By:
	 	/s/
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Louis E. Stellato
	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Tony Orlando PINNIX v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 576P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 2, 2004.

Tony Orlando Pinnix, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 9th day of November 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of December 2004."
46 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Eli Lilly and Co. $2.8 B

Rolls-Royce $930.0 M

Foundation Medicine, Inc. $579.1 M

KPS Capital Partners, LP $479.1 M

ERAPSCO $262.3 M

Raytheon Technologies $237.6 M

AmeriQual Group $203.4 M

SAIC $180.5 M

Calumet Specialty Products Partners, LP $111.5 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $74.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

INDIANA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

29,952

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Marion 277 4,095 2,306 1,145 7,823

Martin 71 4,907 0 0 4,978

Johnson 307 346 1,426 373 2,452

Miami 18 473 38 1,638 2,167

Allen 24 247 1,364 294 1,929

Vigo 26 123 939 149 1,237

Lake 14 69 473 158 714

Tippecanoe 76 33 412 122 643

Hamilton ND 594 0 0 ND

Vanderburgh 16 29 412 138 595

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 4%

Service: 17%

Supplies and

Equipment: 78%

Active Duty: 3%

Civilian: 40%

National 

Guard: 41%

Reserve: 16%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

59%

24%

8%

9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

52%

19%

14%

15%

$2.7 $2.9 $3.1 $3.0 $3.6 $3.2

$4.9

$7.0

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#23 #24 1.5% $1,264 #18 #17 #26 #29

$8.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.9% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$7.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

29,952 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$182.7 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Hamilton

Hancock

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 INDIANA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Marion

St. Joseph

Martin

Whitley

Vanderburgh

Allen

Daviess

Miami

Lawrence

Bartholomew

(M = millions)

$4.7 B

$545.0 M

$495.1 M

$297.1 M

$210.2 M

$194.3 M

$70.6 M

$58.6 M

$43.5 M

$40.5 M

Martin

Marion

Johnson

Miami

Allen

Hamilton

Vigo

Hancock

Tippecanoe

Lake

$462.1 M

$453.6 M

$108.9 M

$73.2 M

$55.8 M

$52.5 M

$44.3 M

$25.0 M

$20.6 M

$18.6 M

47

Whitley

Allen

St. Joseph

Marion

Daviess

Lawrence

Bartholomew

Martin

Vanderburgh

Miami

Lake

Tippecanoe

Vigo

Miami

Marion

Johnson

Martin

Allen
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------
                                                                                

                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant
                         ------------------------------

1)   Starfon Telecom Services AG ("Telecom") formerly known as UTG Telecom AG
     and UTG Telecommunications Holding AG, incorporated under the laws of
     Switzerland on February 29, 1996 (owned 100% by the Company);

2)   UTG Communication Belgium N.V., ("UTG Belgium"), incorporated under the
     laws of Belgium on June 27, 1996 (owned 100% by Telecom);

3)   United Telecom GMBH, ("UTG GMBH") incorporated under the laws of
     Switzerland on May 28, 1996 (owned 100% by Telecom); and

4)   Multicom NV ("Multicom") incorporated under the laws of Belgium (owned 100%
     by UTG Belgium).
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

(1)         this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gander Mountain Company.
| Dated: September 18, 2007 |     |                                    |
|---------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------|
|                      |     | /s/ Mark R. Baker                       |
|                      |     | Mark R. Baker                           |
|                      | * * | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                      |     |                                    |
|                      |     |                                    |
|                      |     | /s/ Robert J. Vold                      |
|                      |     | Robert J. Vold                          |
|                      | * * | *Senior Vice President,*                |
|                      | * * | *Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer* |

 

----