alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5137 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5137

    To ensure that hunting remains a purpose of the New River Gorge 
                            National River.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 28, 2008

  Mr. Rahall introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To ensure that hunting remains a purpose of the New River Gorge 
                            National River.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HUNTING IN NEW RIVER GORGE NATIONAL RIVER.

    Section 1106 of the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978 (16 
U.S.C. 460m-20) is amended in the first sentence by striking ``may'' 
and inserting ``shall''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT
        23.1 - CONSENT OF MAULDIN & JENKINS, LLC**
 
 
 
 
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
 
 We
        consent to the use in Registration Statements (File Numbers 333-111706 and
        333-27127) on Form S-8 of Appalachian Bancshares, Inc. of our report dated
        February 10, 2006 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial
        statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Appalachian
        Bancshares, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2005.
 
 
 /s/
        MAULDIN & JENKINS, LLC
  
 
 
 Atlanta,
        Georgia
 March
        30,
        2006
Exhibit 31 (a)**CERTIFICATION**I,Anthony J. Orlando, Chief Executive Officer and President certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MSW Energy Holdings II LLC;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:August 15, 2005         By:  /s/ Anthony J. Orlando   Anthony J. Orlando   Chief Executive Officer andPresident
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,957-01

IN RE DONALD RAY BRITTON, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. CR11268 IN THE 355TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HOOD COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus

in the 355th District Court of Hood County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and that the

application has not yet been forwarded to this Court.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of Hood

County, is ordered to file a response, which may be made by submitting the record on such habeas

corpus application, submitting a copy of a timely filed order that designates issues to be investigated

(see McCree v. Hampton, 824 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that Relator has
2

not filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus in Hood County. Should the response include

an order designating issues, proof of the date the district attorney’s office was served with the habeas

application shall also be submitted with the response. This application for leave to file a writ of

mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted the appropriate response. Such

response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order.

Filed: September 10, 2014

Do not publish
Public Schools on Military Installations

Before and After 
Logan Elementary

Fort Bliss, TX

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #1
Hillside Elementary

Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #2
Freedom Elementary

Fort Sill, OK

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #3
Murray Middle School

Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, CA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #4
Carter Lake Elementary

Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #5
Parkway Elementary

Fort Polk, LA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #6
Fort Riley Middle School

Fort Riley, KS

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #7
Daniel K. Inouye Elementary

Wheeler/Schofield Army Air Field, HI

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #9
Burroughs High School

Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, CA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #10
Wherry Elementary

Kirtland Air Force Base, NM

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #11
Meriwether Elementary

Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #13
Camp Allen Elementary

Naval Support Activity Norfolk, VA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #14
Rainier Elementary

Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #16
Dugway Schools

Dugway Proving Grounds, UT

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #17
Beachwood Elementary

Joint-Base Lewis McChord, WA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #19
Fort Riley Elementary

Fort Riley, KS

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #20
San Onofre Elementary

Camp Pendleton, CA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #22
Miller Elementary

Naval Base San Diego, CA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #23
Scandia Elementary

Travis Air Force Base, CA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #24
Fort Belvoir Elementary

Fort Belvoir, VA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #26
Solomon Elementary

Wheeler/Schofield Army Air Field, HI

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #28
Evergreen Elementary

Joint-Base Lewis McChord, WA

BEFORE 

AFTER

Priority 

Ranking #29
IN RE K.W.

No. COA05-720.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Northampton (90J10).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Rachel Marshall, CFO, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mountain Valley Bancshares, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: August 14, 2006      /s/ Rachel Marshall Rachel Marshall    Chief Financial Officer  
18
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.



|                        |  |                                         |  |                                                               
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | BANK OF THE JAMES FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
|                        |  |                                        
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | By                                      |  | /S/ Robert R. Chapman III                                     
|                        |  |                                         |  | Robert R. Chapman III, President                              
|                        |  |                                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                 
|                        |  |                                        
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | By                                      |  | /S/ J. Todd Scruggs                                           
|                        |  |                                         |  | J. Todd Scruggs, Secretary and Treasurer                      
|                        |  |                                         |  | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)



29
EXHIBIT 32

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, I, Richard Armstrong, hereby certify that, to
the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report of Strong Technical Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Strong
Technical Inc.



Date: November 15, 2004

/s/ Richard Armstrong
    ---------------------------
    Richard Armstrong,
    Chief Executive Officer
    and Chief Financial Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5206 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Steel Ball Bearing, 62 millimeters outside 

diameter × 30 millimeters inside diameter × 16 millimeters width. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Steel Ball Bearing, 

62 millimeters outside diameter × 30 millimeters inside 

diameter × 16 millimeters width. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STEEL BALL BEARING, 62 MILLIMETERS OUT4 SIDE DIAMETER × 30 MILLIMETERS INSIDE 

5 DIAMETER × 16 MILLIMETERS WIDTH. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

HR 5206 IH 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Steel Ball Bearing, 62 millimeters outside diameter × 30 

millimeters inside diameter × 

16 millimeters width (provided for in subheading 

8482.10.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000055

29-JUN-2018

07:55 AM
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Joseph Ram, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of InfoSonics Corporation, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of InfoSonics Corporation;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: May 15,  2006 | /s/ Joseph  Ram                 |   |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                | Joseph Ram, Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
_______________________________________ __ ___________________ ________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan
September 3, 2008

137015

GLYNN LATERREL WELLS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee. Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices

SC: 137015 CoA: 285062

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the partial filing fee as requi red by the order of Au gust 5, 2008, the Cl erk of the Court is hereby directed to close this file.

jm I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
September 3, 2008
Clerk
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 521 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2007 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, 

as the ‘‘Lane Evans Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS

2 

HR 521 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LANE EVANS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, 

4 Illinois, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lane 

5 Evans Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lane Evans Post Of10 fice Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 29, 

2007. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
# L_2014363DE.01018601.xml

| 18.12.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 363/186 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 363/186

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 650/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 4. Juli 2012 über die Zuständigkeit, das anzuwendende Recht, die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung von Entscheidungen und die Annahme und Vollstreckung öffentlicher Urkunden in Erbsachen sowie zur Einführung eines Europäischen Nachlasszeugnisses

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 201 vom 27. Juli 2012
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 201 vom 27. Juli 2012

Auf Seite 28 in Artikel 27 Absatz 1 Buchstabe d:

anstatt:

| „d) | dem Recht des Staates entspricht, in dem der Erblasser oder mindestens eine der Personen, deren Rechtsnachfolge von Todes wegen durch einen Erbvertrag betroffen ist, entweder im Zeitpunkt der Errichtung der Verfügung oder des Abschlusses des Erbvertrags oder gewöhnlichen Aufenthalt hatte, oder ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„d)

dem Recht des Staates entspricht, in dem der Erblasser oder mindestens eine der Personen, deren Rechtsnachfolge von Todes wegen durch einen Erbvertrag betroffen ist, entweder im Zeitpunkt der Errichtung der Verfügung oder des Abschlusses des Erbvertrags oder gewöhnlichen Aufenthalt hatte, oder ...“

muss es heißen:

| „d) | dem Recht des Staates entspricht, in dem der Erblasser oder mindestens eine der Personen, deren Rechtsnachfolge von Todes wegen durch einen Erbvertrag betroffen ist, entweder im Zeitpunkt der Errichtung der Verfügung oder des Abschlusses des Erbvertrags oder im Zeitpunkt des Todes seinen/ihren gewöhnlichen Aufenthalt hatte, oder ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„d)

dem Recht des Staates entspricht, in dem der Erblasser oder mindestens eine der Personen, deren Rechtsnachfolge von Todes wegen durch einen Erbvertrag betroffen ist, entweder im Zeitpunkt der Errichtung der Verfügung oder des Abschlusses des Erbvertrags oder im Zeitpunkt des Todes seinen/ihren gewöhnlichen Aufenthalt hatte, oder ...“

.

---
STATE v. POWERS

No. COA04-1300

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Sampson (02CRS54785).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5413 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Thionyl chloride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2008 

Mr. ETHERIDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Thionyl chloride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THIONYL CHLORIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 2-[4,5-Thionyl chloride (CAS 

No. 7719–09–7) (provided 

for in subheading 

2812.10.50) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5413 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS