alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350), the undersigned officer of Southwest Community Bancorp (the
Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: November 12, 2004 /s/ James L. LemeryJames L. LemeryExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 26
#### In the Matter of Rafael Almeyda, Appellant, v Brion D. Travis, as Chair of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 856]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Stein, J.), entered January 27, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Petitioner is serving a prison sentence of 15 years to life upon a 1979 conviction of murder in the second degree for the death of his infant child. Petitioner appeared before the Board of Parole for the seventh time in April 2004 and was again denied parole release. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging that determination. Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

Initially, “[w]e are unpersuaded by petitioner’s contention that the determination was based upon an informal policy to deny parole to all violent felons rather than on the relevant statutory factors” *(Matter of Little v Travis,*15 AD3d 698, 698 [2005], *appeal dismissed*4 NY3d 878 [2005]; *see Matter of Davis v New York State Bd. of Parole,*17 AD3d 970 [2005]). A review of the record reveals that the Board properly considered not only the instant offense but all the relevant statutory factors *(see*Executive Law § 259-i), including petitioner’s institutional programming achievements, lack of a disciplinary record and his plans for release. Thus, inasmuch as petitioner has not demonstrated that the Board’s determination was affected by “ ‘irrationality bordering on impropriety’ ” *(Matter of Silmon v Travis,*95 NY2d 470, 476 [2000], quoting *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, 77 [1980]), we find no basis upon which to disturb it.

Petitioner’s remaining contentions, including his claim that the Board improperly held against him his refusal to discuss the crime, have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
IN RE C.K.M.

No. COA03-1508.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 16, 2004

Certification Date December 6, 2004

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed.
HomeOcean Facts

# What are jellyfish made of?

## Only about five percent of the body of a jellyfish is solid matter; the rest is water.

Fascinating, elegant, and mysterious to watch in the water, take a jellyfish out of the water, and it becomes a much less fascinating blob. This is because jellyfish are about 95 percent water.

Fascinating, elegant, and mysterious to watch in the water,  take a jellyfish out of the water, and it becomes a much less fascinating blob.  This is because jellyfish are about 95 percent water.

Lacking brains, blood, or even hearts, jellyfish are pretty  simple critters. They are  composed of three layers: an outer layer, called the epidermis; a middle layer  made of a thick, elastic, jelly-like substance called mesoglea; and an inner  layer, called the gastrodermis. An elementary nervous system, or nerve net, allows jellyfish  to smell, detect light, and respond to other stimuli. The simple digestive  cavity of a jellyfish acts as both its stomach and intestine, with one opening  for both the mouth and the anus.

These simple invertebrates are members of the phylum  Cnidaria, which includes creatures such as sea anemones, sea whips, and corals.  Like all members of the phylum, the body parts of a jellyfish radiate from a  central axis. This “radial symmetry” allows jellyfish to detect and respond to  food or danger from any direction. 

Jellyfish have the ability to sting with their tentacles. While the severity of  stings varies, in humans, most jellyfish stings result only in minor discomfort.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - Immortal Jellyfish (video)

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           Dec-31-1998
<CASH>                                                       13458
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  976
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   (70)
<INVENTORY>                                                  23345
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             39392
<PP&E>                                                       21813
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (8830)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               52994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         9043
<BONDS>                                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                       132
<OTHER-SE>                                                   43054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 52994
<SALES>                                                     100677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            100677
<CGS>                                                        41236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                53085
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            (350)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               6706
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  2674
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           4032
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  4032
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0.32
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000450 04-DEC-2014 08:24 AM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

LEROY STALLWORTH,

Petitioner

v.

JOHN KERESTES,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 46 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5470 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the carriage of all 

local television signals by satellite carriers in all local markets. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2008 

Mr. STUPAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the 

carriage of all local television signals by satellite carriers 

in all local markets. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SATELLITE CARRIAGE OF ALL LOCAL TELE4 VISION SIGNALS IN ALL LOCAL MARKETS RE5 QUIRED. 

6 (a) NATIONAL LOCAL-TO-LOCAL.—Section 338(a)(1) 

7 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 338(a)(1)) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘within that local market’’ and in9 serting ‘‘within any local market’’. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5470 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 338(a) of 

2 such Act (47 U.S.C. 338(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘(3) 

3 EFFECTIVE DATE.—’’ and all that follows through 

4 ‘‘2002.’’. 

5 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

6 The amendments made by section 1 shall be effective 

7 on February 17, 2009. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5

<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                       dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                                         2,014,706
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    917,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       0
<PP&E>                                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               104,416,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  0
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    53,900,414
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 104,416,786
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               7,373,981
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               7,323,236
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  74,277
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               714,701
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                 (738,233)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (738,233)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (738,233)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0


</TABLE>
Johnathon KELLY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19M70

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition for writ of certiorari out of time denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 544 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 12
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 544

                          [Report No. 110-18]

  To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal Place in 
    Santa Fe, New Mexico, as the ``Santiago E. Campos United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2007

 Mr. Udall of New Mexico (for himself, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. 
  McDermott, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, and Mr. Pastor) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

                           February 16, 2007

             Additional sponsors: Mr. Hinojosa and Mr. Baca

                           February 16, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal Place in 
    Santa Fe, New Mexico, as the ``Santiago E. Campos United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at South Federal Place in Santa Fe, 
New Mexico, shall be known and designated as the ``Santiago E. Campos 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Santiago E. 
Campos United States Courthouse''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 12

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 544

                          [Report No. 110-18]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal Place in 
    Santa Fe, New Mexico, as the ``Santiago E. Campos United States 
                             Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 16, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5483 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5483

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, as the ``Private 
        First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 25, 2008

  Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, as the ``Private 
        First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS DAVID H. SHARRETT II POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Private First Class David H. Sharrett II 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Morris Erbesh, NNE, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Esther E. Schwartz et al., Respondents.

[799 NYS2d 905]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rudolph, J.), entered October 12, 2004, which denied their motion, among other things, to strike the answer or compel the defendants to comply with the demand for a bill of particulars and notice to produce.

*533Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion because the plaintiffs’ demand for a bill of particulars and notice to produce were “palpably improper” (see *Hillside Equities v UFH Apts.,*297 AD2d 704, 705 [2002]; *Harrell v County of Nassau,*227 AD2d 590, 591 [1996]; *Coleman v Richards,*138 AD2d 556 [1988]; *Ginsberg v Ginsberg,*104 AD2d 482 [1984]). The Supreme Court was not required to prune the plaintiffs’ improper demands (see *Haszinger v Praver,*12 AD3d 485, 486 [2004]; *Posh Pillows v Hawes,*138 AD2d 472 [1988]; *Simpson Elec. Corp. v Leucadia, Inc.,*130 AD2d 738 [1987]; *Benzenberg v Telecom Plus of Upstate N.Y.,*119 AD2d 717 [1986]; *Jonassen v A.M.F., Inc.,*104 AD2d 484, 486 [1984]). Adams, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Skelos, JJ., concur.
STATE v. TIPTON.

No. COA05-441.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Mitchell (04CRS50230).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5415 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Sodium Methylate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2008 

Mr. ETHERIDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Sodium Methylate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SODIUM METHYLATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Sodium Methylate (CAS No. 

67–56–1 124–41–4) (provided for in subheading 

2905.19.90) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5415 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Introduction"This workbook contains data from Defense Spending by State Fiscal Year 2019, a publication of the U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation (OLDCC) (formerly the Office of Economic Adjustment).* The data are contained in 17 worksheets, which are listed in the Table of Contents."The data can be broadly categorized as follows:1. Defense contract spending"2. Defense personnel numbers (i.e., counts of defense personnel)""3. Defense personnel spending, and ""4. Total defense spending (i.e., contract and personnel spending combined)"Methodology ChangeThe FY 2019 report methodology did not change substantially from the FY 2018 report. Acknowledgements"OLDCC partnered with the Library of Congress’s Federal Research Division (FRD) to produce this report. FRD’s analytical team includes Vega Bharadwaj, Katarina David, Malinda Goodrich, Hannah Ho, Sarah McNeal, Wm. Noël Noël, Annie Rorem, Alan Stone, and Liz White. Liz Chimienti managed this project for OLDCC and provided input throughout the report’s development. This research benefited from the guidance of staff at the DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center, the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and the Congressional Research Service. Experts at the American Enterprise Institute, Brookings Institution, Center for a New American Security, and Center for Strategic and International Studies generously offered feedback on earlier versions of this report."Please direct any questions or suggestions for future reports via email to:Tara Butler"Program Director, Intergovernmental Affairs""Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, U.S. Department of Defense"tara.a.butler4.civ@mail.mil"Electronic copies of this spreadsheet and the associated PDF report are located online at https://oea.gov/dsbs-fy2019. For information on how the figures were produced, please consult the methodology appendix located in the linked file, 01_Narrative_Sections_of_PDF_Report.txt."* The name of the Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA) recently changed to Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation per Section 905 of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. This report is a continuation of the annual series issued by OEA since Fiscal Year 2013.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Tracy R. Newton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Joseph T. Moss, Jr., Principal Financial Officer, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                            
|--- |  | ---------------------------
|By: |  |                            
|    |  | /s/ Tracy R. Newton        
|    |  | Tracy R. Newton            
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer    
|    |  | March 30, 2007             
|    | 
|    |  | /s/ Joseph T. Moss, Jr.    
|    |  | Joseph T. Moss, Jr.        
|    |  | Principal Financial Officer
|    |  | March 30, 2007