alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 50 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

:\HSEENR\h50--enr.xml [file 1 of 1]

        H.R.50

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven

                                 An Act

 
To reauthorize the African Elephant Conservation Act and the Rhinoceros 
                   and Tiger Conservation Act of 1994.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Multinational Species Conservation 
Funds Reauthorization Act of 2007''.
SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION AND AMENDMENT OF AFRICAN ELEPHANT CONSERVATION 
ACT.
    (a) Notice of Approval of Project Proposal.--Section 2101(c) of the 
African Elephant Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 4211(c)) is amended by 
striking ``and to each country within which the project is proposed to 
be conducted''.
    (b) Administrative Expenses.--Section 2306(b) of the African 
Elephant Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 4245(b)) is amended by striking 
``$80,000'' and inserting ``$100,000''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 2306(a) of the 
African Elephant Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 4245(a)) is amended by 
striking ``2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007'' and inserting 
``2007 through 2012''.
SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION AND AMENDMENT OF RHINOCEROS AND TIGER 
CONSERVATION ACT OF 1994.
    (a) Notice of Approval of Project Proposal.--Section 5(c) of the 
Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 5304(c)) is 
amended in the third sentence by striking ``, to the Administrator, and 
to each country within which the project is to be conducted'' and 
inserting ``and to the Administrator''.
    (b) Administrative Expenses.--Section 10(b) of the Rhinoceros and 
Tiger Conservation Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 5306(b)) is amended by 
striking ``$80,000'' and inserting ``$100,000''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 10(a) of the 
Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 5306(a)) is 
amended by striking ``2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007'' 
and inserting ``2007 through 2012''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of B&G Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending September 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David L. Wenner,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Robert C. Cantwell, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ David L. Wenner     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David L. Wenner         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| October 30, 2008   |   |
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Robert  C. Cantwell |   |
| Robert C. Cantwell      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| October 30, 2008   |   |

 

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.*

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 14, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50401 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAMON ARMENDARIZ, also known as Sleepy, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-1437-9-DB

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Ramon Armendariz on direct appeal has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). Armendariz filed a response in which he asserts that he did not waive his right to the preparation of a presentence report (PSR) and that a PSR would have indicated that his 180-month sentence constituted an upward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines range. Our independent review of the brief, Armendariz’s response, and theNo. 03-50401 -2- record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL
IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5249 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-[[3- 

(Acetylamino)phenyl]amino]-1-amino-9,10-dihydro- 9,10-dioxo-2- 

anthracenesulfonic acid, monosodium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-[[3- 

(Acetylamino)phenyl]amino]-1-amino-9,10-dihydro- 9,10- 

dioxo-2-anthracenesulfonic acid, monosodium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-[[3-(ACETYLAMINO)PHENYL]AMINO]-1-AMINO4 9,10-DIHYDRO- 9,10-DIOXO-2- 

5 ANTHRACENESULFONIC ACID, MONOSODIUM 

6 SALT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.02 of the Har8 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

9 4-[[3-(Acetylamino)phenyl]amino]-1-amino-9,10-dihydroVerDate Aug 31 2005 05:46 Feb 08, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5249.IH H5249

smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5249 IH

1 9,10-dioxo-2-anthracenesulfonic acid, monosodium salt) is 

2 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

3 2011’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

6 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

7 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
SIMMONS v. KING.

No. COA05-413.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Cabarrus (O1CVS2578)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
Anna YOUNG v. PRANCING HORSE, INC. and Ronni Meltzer.

No. 329PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Jerry D. Rhoades, Jr., Southern Pines, for Anna Young.

F. Thomas Holt, III, Fayetteville, for Prancing Horse, Inc.

Derek M. Crump, for Ronni Meltzer.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th day of June 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."

Plaintiff shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
STATE of North Carolina v. Abdul Jermaine CORBETT.

No. 98A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 27, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 168 N.C.App. 117, 607 S.E.2d 281 (2005), finding no error in the judgments and commitments entered 1 July 2003 by Judge A. Leon Stanback in Superior *626Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 May 2005.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Susan R. Lundberg, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Marilyn G. Ozer, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**TELANETIX, INC.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telanetix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Paul Quinn, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,            as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|                 |   |                         |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------|
| Date:August 14, 2008 |   | /s/ J. Paul Quinn            |
|                 |   | J. Paul Quinn                |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer |
<PAGE>



Exhibit 10.10

   FIRST AMENDMENT TO NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. LOAN AGREEMENT, SECURITY
             AGREEMENT AND 10% CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE

      THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. LOAN AGREEMENT,
SECURITY AGREEMENT AND 10% CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (the "First
Amendment") is made and entered into as of July 26, 2005, by and among NORTHWEST
BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "Maker") and Toucan Capital
Fund II, L.P. (the "Holder"). This First Amendment amends the Note (as defined
below).

                                    RECITALS

A. Section 17.6 of that certain Northwest Biotherapeutics, Inc. Loan Agreement,
Security Agreement and 10% Convertible, Secured Promissory Note, in the
principal amount of $500,000.00 dated as of October 22, 2004, by and between the
Maker and the Holder in the form attached to this First Amendment as Exhibit A
(the "Note"), states that any provision of such note may be amended or waived in
writing by the Holder and the Maker; and

B. The Maker and the Holder wish to amend the Note as provided below.

                                    AGREEMENT

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended to provide that the Maturity Date is
November 1, 2005.

2. All other terms and conditions of the Note shall be unaffected hereby and
remain in full force and effect.

                                        1

<PAGE>



3. This First Amendment shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the
state of Delaware without giving effect to principles of conflicts of laws of
the State of Delaware or any other state.

                            [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

                                        2

<PAGE>



      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this FIRST AMENDMENT
TO NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC. LOAN AGREEMENT, SECURITY AGREEMENT AND 10%
CONVERTIBLE, SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE as of the date first above written.

MAKER:

NORTHWEST BIOTHERAPEUTICS, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

By:_________________________________
Name:_______________________________
Title:______________________________

HOLDER:

Toucan Capital Fund II, L.P.

By:________________________________
   Linda Powers, Managing Director

                                        3
# L_2017158EN.01004301.xml

| 21.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 158/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 158/43

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2017/1101

of 19 June 2017

appointing a chairperson of a Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2017 on the European Union trade mark (1) and in particular Article 166(1) thereof,

Whereas on 1 December 2016, a list of candidates to the post of chairperson of a Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (‘the Office’) was submitted to the Council by the Management Board of the Office,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Sven STÜRMANN, born in Bonn (Germany) on 20 November 1971, is hereby appointed chairperson of a Board of Appeal of the Office for a term of 5 years.

The date on which the 5-year term referred to in the first paragraph shall commence shall be determined by the Management Board of the Office.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 19 June 2017.

For the Council

The President

J. HERRERA

---

(1)  
  OJ L 154, 16.6.2017, p. 1.

1

---
BOICE-WILLIS CLINIC, P.A. v. SEAMAN.

No. COA05-298.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Nash (04CVS2101)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5489 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

6892 Main Street in Gloucester, Virginia, as the ‘‘Congresswoman Jo 

Ann S. Davis Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2008 

Mr. WITTMAN of Virginia (for himself, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. GOODE, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. 

WOLF, Mr. BOUCHER, Mrs. DRAKE, Mr. FORBES, and Mr. GOODLATTE) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6892 Main Street in Gloucester, Virginia, as 

the ‘‘Congresswoman Jo Ann S. Davis Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONGRESSWOMAN JO ANN S. DAVIS POST OF4 FICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 6892 Main Street in Gloucester, 

7 Virginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Congress8 woman Jo Ann S. Davis Post Office’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5489 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Congresswoman Jo 

5 Ann S. Davis Post Office’’. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
RE: Docket Number 2021 -CA -1292

Peter T. Dazzio

versus - - 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

City Parish of Baton Rouge and City of Baton Rouge Red

Light Enforcement Program

On Application

Rehearing A

19th Judicial District Court

Case *: 700899

East Baton Rouge Parish

on 05/ 04/ 2022 By Peter T. Dazzio

Vanessa Guidrii Whi

Allison H. Penzato

Elizabeth Wolfe

Date

MAY 1 2 2022

0 . s ^,- P — 

Rodd Naquin, Clerk
In the Senate of the United States, 

September 26 (legislative day, September 17), 2008. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 5350) entitled ‘‘An Act to authorize the Secretary 

of Commerce to sell or exchange certain National Oceanic 

and Atmospheric Administration property located in Norfolk, 

Virginia, and for other purposes.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

On page 4, after line 20, insert: 

1 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 

2 Secretary of Commerce, through the Under Secretary 

3 and Administrator of the National Oceanic and At4 mospheric Administration (NOAA), is authorized to 

5 enter into a land lease with Mobile County, Alabama 

6 for a period of not less than 40 years, on such terms 

7 and conditions as NOAA deems appropriate, for pur8 poses of construction of a Gulf of Mexico Disaster Re9 sponse Center facility, provided that the lease is at no 

10 cost to the government. NOAA may enter into agree-
2 

•HR 5350 EAS 

1 ments with state, local, or county governments for 

2 purposes of joint use, operations and occupancy of 

3 such facility. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H.R. 5350 

AMENDMENT
MANNING, et al. v. COUNTY OF HALIFAX.

No. 589PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 18, 2005.

Christopher W. Jones, John W. O'Tuel, Raleigh, for The County of Halifax.

James B. Blackburn, Raleigh, for Asso. County Commissioners.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 15th day of April 2005 by Plaintiff for extension of time to file brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Manning, et al.) shall have up to and including the 25th day of April 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the *30Court in conference this the 18th day of April 2005."
BROWN v. NC DEPT. OF CORRECTION.

No. 715P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Marc X. Sneed, Richard J. Votta, Assistant Attorney Generals, for N.C. Dept. of Correction.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of December 2005 by Plaintiff for "Petition for Discretionary Review Under G.S. 7A-31(c)":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of January 2006."
Air Force

Army

Navy/Marines

Other Defense

59%

17%

21%

3%

$0.8

$0.7 $0.7

$0.5 $0.6

$0.7

$0.8

$0.7

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

39%

7%

54%

0%

Construcon: 4%

Research and

 Development: 2%

Service: 62%

Supplies and

 Equipment: 31%

Acve Duty: 37%

Civilian: 25%

Naonal Guard/

Reserve: 38%

Northrop Grumman

Mercom

CounterTrade Products

BAE Systems

Sterling Computers

CSRA

Hewle‐Packard

Raytheon

McCallie Associates

Hydrogeologic

$74.3 M

$69.1 M

$38.4 M

$26.3 M

$26.1 M

$24.8 M

$18.9 M

$16.1 M

$16.1 M

$15.8 M

Sarpy

Lancaster

Douglas

Saunders

Hall

Adams

Buffalo

Gage

Dodge

Plae

County

9,478

2,911

1,966

436

294

212

203

194

192

191

Total*

6,146

41

86

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Acve Duty

   Military

2,623

500

872

36

34

21

ND

ND

ND

ND

Civilian

 FISCAL YEAR 2017

NEBRASKA

   DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Con ense Con ense Contractors (M=millions)

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

   DEFENSE PERSONNEL

Allocaons, By Type

Allocaons, By Service

$868.8 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

$868.8 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

16,797

TOTAL PERSONNEL

16,797

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Loc sonnel Loc sonnel Locaons

*Total also includes unif al also includes uniformed Na ormed Naonal Guar onal Guard and R d and Reserve units. e units.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

70 Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017
AF Actve AF Guard Army Guard

NEBRASKANEBRASKANEBRASKA NEBRASKA

#40 #35 0.4% $793 #41 #37 #34

$1.5 B

SPENT IN STATE

1.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S.

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.7 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

16,797 NUMBER

OF PERSONNEL

$0.9 B PERSONNEL

SPENDING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)(M=millions) (M=millions)

Sarpy County

$503.6 M

Douglas County

$62.8 M

Madison County

$26.9 M

Lancaster County

$17.8 M

Adams County

$12.1 M

Harlan County

$9.7 M

Saunders County

$5.9 M

Hall County

$4.5 M

Thurston County

$3.7 M

Nemaha County

$3.0 M

Sarpy

Douglas

Madison

Lancaster

Adams

Harlan

Saunders

Hall

Thurston

Nemaha

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)(M=millions) (M=millions)

Sarpy County

$634.4 M

Douglas County

$95.4 M

Lancaster County

$92.9 M

Saunders County

$11.3 M

Hall County

$6.8 M

Cedar County

$4.1 M

Dodge County

$3.3 M

Adams County

$3.3 M

Bufalo County

$3.3 M

Plate County

$2.6 M

Sarpy

Douglas

Lancaster

Saunders

Hall

Cedar

Dodge

Adams

Bufalo

Plate

Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017 71
H. R. 5400 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 160 East 

Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, as the ‘‘Sgt. Michael M. Kashkoush 

Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SGT. MICHAEL M. KASHKOUSH POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, 

Ohio, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sgt. Michael M. 

Kashkoush Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sgt. Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed August 26, 2013.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-01061-CR

No. 05-13-01062-CR

GONZALO CHAVEZ JR., APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F01-75915-Q, F01-75916-Q

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Moseley, Bridges, and Lang-Miers

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeals. Appellant’s counsel has approved 

the motion. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeals be DISMISSED

and this decision be certified below for observance. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

131061F.U05
EXHIBIT 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Numbers:  333-16359, 333-92549, 333-119394, 333-139026, 333-133831, 333-148127, 333-145790, 333-157178, 333-157566, 333-157566, and 333-165804) and on Form S-3 (File Number: 333-157178) of Centrue Financial Corporation of our report dated March 18, 2011 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




Crowe Horwath LLP





Oak Brook, Illinois


March 18, 2011