alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMERISAFE, Inc., a Texas corporation (the Company), for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
such officers knowledge:

1. The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 6, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ C. Allen Bradley, Jr.                                                         
|                    |  |  |  | C. Allen Bradley, Jr.                                                             
|                    |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)     
|                    |  | 
|                    |  |  |  | /s/ Geoffrey R. Banta                                                             
|                    |  |  |  | Geoffrey R. Banta                                                                 
|                    |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23


                        Consent of Independent Auditors


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of CUNO Incorporated ("CUNO") of our report dated December 11, 1997,
included in the 1997 Annual Report to Stockholders of CUNO.

     Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of CUNO listed in
Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In our
opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in
all material respects the information set forth therein.

      We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-39763) pertaining to the CUNO Incorporated 1996
Stock Incentive Plan, the CUNO Incorporated Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option
Plan and the CUNO Incorporated Savings and Retirement Plan of our report dated
December 11, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
incorporated herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding
paragraph with respect to the financial statement schedule included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of CUNO.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Hartford, Connecticut
January 28, 1998
EXHIBIT (31.1)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a/15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238 and 33-8760 and Rule
14d-14(a) under the Exchange Act];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ ELMER DOTYElmer DotyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. RICHARDSON.

No. COA05-215.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from Nash (02CRS59249, 02CRS59250).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part. Remanded in part.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spirit Finance Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Morton H. Fleischer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 12, 2005 |                                              |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                              |
|                       | /s/ Morton H. Fleischer                           |   |
|                       | Morton H. Fleischer                               |
|                       | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended July 31, 2005 (the  "Report") of SE Financial  Corp.  (the  "Company")  as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, I, Pamela
M.  Cyr,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Executive  and  Financial &  Accounting  Officer),  hereby  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: September 14, 2005                    /s/Pamela M. Cyr
      ------------------                    ------------------------------------
                                            Pamela M. Cyr
                                            President & CEO
                                            (Principal Executive and Financial &
                                            Accounting Officer)
Order entered September 26, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01319-CV

IN RE ALLISON HOLLINGSWORTH, Relator

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 429-00556-2011

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of today’s date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus and motion for emergency relief. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this 

original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS

JUSTICE
IN RE S.C.B.

No. COA05-1278.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed June 6, 2006

Certification Date June 26, 2006

Appeal from Mecklenburg (05J293)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENTS


     WHEREAS, on April 19, 2005, Smith Production Inc., as
Seller, and Fidelity Exploration & Production Company, as
Purchaser, entered into (i) a Purchase and Sale Agreement
covering Tabasco Field and Texan Gardens Field having an
Effective Time of May 1, 2005 at 7:00 a.m. and (ii) a Purchase
and Sale Agreement covering Flores Field having an Effective Time
of May 1, 2005 at 7:00 a.m. Said two Purchase and Sale Agreements
are jointly referred to herein as the "Agreements";

     WHEREAS, Smith Production Inc. and Fidelity Exploration &
Production Company desire to amend the Agreements as provided in
this First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreements (the
"Amendment").

     WHEREAS, all defined terms which are not defined in this
Amendment shall have the same meaning as in the Agreements;

     NOW THEREFORE, for valuable consideration received, Smith
Production Inc. and Fidelity Exploration & Production Company
hereby amend the Agreements as follows:

1. The first sentence in Section 3.4 (a) in both Agreements is
deleted and replaced with the following:

     "To assert a claim arising out of a breach of Seller's
     representation and warranty of Defensible Title in Section
     3.1(a), Purchaser must deliver claim notices to Seller (each
     a "Title Defect Notice") on or before Tuesday, April 26,
     2005 at 4:00 p.m. C.S.T. (the "Title Claim Date"), except as
     otherwise provided in Sections 3.5, 3.6 or 3.7."

2. The following language is added as Section 9.1 (c) to both
Agreements:

     "In the event that Purchaser delivers a Title Defect Notice
     to Seller, Seller shall have the option, at its sole
     election, to extend the Closing Date until May 10, 2005 at
     10:00 a.m. local time. In the event that Seller elects to
     extend the Closing Date, Seller shall give written notice of
     such extension to Purchaser as provided in the Agreements."

      As amended  herein, the Agreements are hereby adopted,
ratified and confirmed as being in full force and effect pursuant
to their terms.

      This Amendment shall be binding on Smith Production Inc.,
Fidelity Exploration & Production Company and their respective
successors and assigns.

      This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall have the same force and effect as an
original.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by Smith
Production Inc. and Fidelity Exploration & Production Company to
be effective as of April 19, 2005.


Smith Production Inc.

By:  /s/ GLENN R. SMITH
Glenn R. Smith, President


Fidelity Exploration & Production Company

By: /s/ MICHAEL C. CASKEY
Michael C. Caskey, Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 16, 2018

No. 04-18-00152-CR

Alejandro ESPARZA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 83rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13503CR

Honorable Robert Cadena, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal has been filed in this appeal. 

The trial court judge has certified that the underlying criminal case “is a plea-bargain case, and 

the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Therefore, we ORDER the trial court clerk to file an 

electronic clerk’s record within TEN DAYS from the date of this order containing the following 

documents:

1. all pre-trial orders and the related pre-trial motions;

2. the Court’s Admonishments, the defendant’s Waiver, Consent to Stipulation of 

Testimony, and any other stipulations, and all other documents relating to the 

defendant=s plea bargain;

3. the Judgment;

4. all post-judgment motions and orders;

5. the Notice of Appeal;

6. the Trial Court’s Certification of Defendant’s Right of Appeal; and

7. the Criminal Docket Sheet.
We DIRECT the clerk of this court to send a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, 

the trial court clerk, and the court reporter(s) responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in 

this appeal.

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
STATE v. Lawrence JACKSON.

No. 424P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Gary R. Govert, Special Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of February 2005 by Defendant for Reconsideration:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 26th day of January 2006."
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Jenkins, Appellant.

[798 NYS2d 906]

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County (Budd G. Goodman, J.), rendered March 19, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent felony offender, to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s argument that this sentence constituted a penalty for going to trial is unpreserved and unavailing *(see*
      *253
      *People v Besser,*96 NY2d 136, 148 [2001]). The procedure employed in deciding to impose a recidivist sentence is not unconstitutional *(see People v Rivera,*5 NY3d 61 [2005]; *People v Rosen,*96 NY2d 329 [2001], *cert denied*534 US 899 [2001]), and the court properly exercised its discretion in sentencing defendant as a persistent felony offender. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
IN RE W.F.P.

No. COA05-920

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Caswell (01J53, 01J54).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Albert TARANTINO.

No. 492P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 9, 2005.

Joseph B. Cheshire, V, Raleigh, Sean P. Devereaux, Asheville, for Tarantino.

Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the emergency petition filed by Defendant on the 9th day of September 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of September 2005."
# L_2016292DE.01005001.xml

| 27.10.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 292/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 292/50

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 231/2012 der Kommission vom 9. März 2012 mit Spezifikationen für die in den Anhängen II und III der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1333/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates aufgeführten Lebensmittelzusatzstoffe

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 83 vom 22. März 2012
  )

Seite 13, Anhang, Eintrag für E 120 Echtes Karmin, in der Zeile „Gehalt“:

Anstatt:

„mindestens 2,0 % Karminsäure in den karminsäurehaltigen Extrakten; höchstens 50 % Karminsäure in den Chelaten“

muss es heißen:

„mindestens 2,0 % Karminsäure in den karminsäurehaltigen Extrakten; mindestens 50 % Karminsäure in den Chelaten“.

---
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 28, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00548-CR

CHRISTOPHER RIOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 10th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 22-CR-1559

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant appeals his conviction for theft of property with a value of 

$150,000 or more but less than $300,000. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(a), 

(e)(6)(A). Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation 

of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. 

See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
2

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 

60 days have passed and no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in 

the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief 

or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for 

review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
STATE v. Steward Pernell HUNTLEY.

No. 294P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of June 2005 by Defendant for "Petition for a Review":

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of June 2005."

Justice MARTIN recused.
August 20 - 22, 2019 • Colorado Convention Center • Denver CO 1
August 20 - 22, 2019 • Colorado Convention Center • Denver CO

Oliver Fritz

Principal Director

Office of the Deputy Assistant 

Secretary of Defense (Energy)

2
August 20 - 22, 2019 • Colorado Convention Center • Denver CO

Energy Storage at DOD

21 August 2019

3
August 20 - 22, 2019 • Colorado Convention Center • Denver CO

Why Energy Storage?

 Energy supply and distribution is at risk

- “Every domain is contested” 

- “The homeland is no longer a sanctuary” 

- All Hazards risks to energy resilience

 Energy dependence of DoD bases, equipment, operations 

- Critical missions at installations

- Reachback and operations from the U.S.

- High energy weapons and sensors

- Austere, agile, distributed operations

 Evolving technology and policy

- Multiple energy sources, two way energy flows

- Resilience and cyber security integral to energy decisions

- Potential to reduce need for re-supply

4

Energy storage → Energy resilience → Military capability
August 20 - 22, 2019 • Colorado Convention Center • Denver CO

Applications of DoD Energy Storage

5

Permanent Bases

• Large format storage to support renewables, microgrids

• Power for hotel loads, sensors, communications, directed energy, force protection

Contingency Bases

• Large format storage to support solar, hybrid generation, microgrids; transportable via air/sea

• Power for hotel loads, sensors, communications, directed energy, force protection

Platforms

• Power for comms, directed energy weapons, high power sensors, electronic warfare

• Rugged, transportable via air/sea

Dismounted Warfighter

• Disposable and rechargeable batteries, transportable via air/sea

• Power for night vision, communications, IT, sensors, command and control, weapons 
August 20 - 22, 2019 • Colorado Convention Center • Denver CO

Attributes of DoD Energy Storage

6

 Attributes of desired energy 

storage aligned to military 

use cases

 Similarities with commercial 

storage balanced against unique 

DoD requirements

What good 

looks like... 

Cyber Secure

Inter-operable

Safe to Use 

and Transport

Capable

Assured 

Supply 

Chain

Cost Effective

Maintainable/ 

Supportable

DoD
August 20 - 22, 2019 • Colorado Convention Center • Denver CO

Solutions to DoD Energy Storage Needs

 DoD-owned and operated - Develop, acquire, field

- Rapidly prototype and field

- Rapidly field mature equipment

 Operational Contract Support

- Commercial services in support of operations and exercises

 Third Party Financing

- ESPC/UESC, Utilities Privatization, Power Purchase Agreements

7

Enabled 

by people
August 20 - 22, 2019 • Colorado Convention Center • Denver CO

Way Ahead:

Energy Resilience through Energy Storage

 Support the fielding of interoperable, capable, and 

transportable batteries

 Continue to take advantage of energy storage as part of third 

party financing solutions

 Support development of human capital to oversee, use, and 

apply energy storage across installations

8
August 20 - 22, 2019 • Colorado Convention Center • Denver CO

Thank You

9