alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth David KEY, Jr.

No. 491P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

L. Jayne Stowers, Winston-Salem, for Key.

Elizabeth N. Strickland, Assistant Attorney General, Tom Horner, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 6th day of September 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of September 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
EXHIBIT 32

               STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Geoffrey Alison, is the Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Financial Officer of Castle & Morgan Holdings, Inc. (the "Company").

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company
of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
2005 (the "Report").

By execution of this statement, I certify that:

a.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

b.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.


      /S/ Geoffrey Alison
      ---------------------
      Geoffrey Alison, Chief Executive Officer
      and Principal Financial Officer

      Date:  August 12, 2005

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.


                                      -14-
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5561 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5561

 To amend the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 to provide for a temporary 
    increase in the maximum loan guaranty amount for housing loans 
            guaranteed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2008

  Mr. Buyer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 to provide for a temporary 
    increase in the maximum loan guaranty amount for housing loans 
            guaranteed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Mortgage Stimulus 
Clarification Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY INCREASE IN MAXIMUM LOAN GUARANTY AMOUNT FOR HOUSING 
              LOANS GUARANTEED BY SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    Section 201(a) of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 (Public Law 
110-185; 122 Stat. 613) is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(3) VA guaranteed housing loans.--Notwithstanding 
        subparagraph (C) of section 3703(a)(1) of title 38, United 
        States Code, for purposes of any loan described in that section 
        for which the mortgagee issues a loan commitment during the 
        period beginning on February 13, 2008, and ending at the end of 
        December 31, 2008, the term `maximum guaranty amount' means the 
        dollar amount that is equal to 25 percent of the amount 
        determined under paragraph (2) of this subsection for a 
        residence of the applicable size located in the area in which 
        the residence for which the loan is made is located.''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2016162EN.01000101.xml

| 21.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 162/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 162/1

---

COUNCIL REGULATION (EU) 2016/983

of 20 June 2016

repealing Regulation (EC) No 234/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Liberia

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 215 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/994 of 20 June 2016 repealing Common Position 2008/109/CFSP concerning restrictive measures imposed against Liberia (1),

Having regard to the joint proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 25 May 2016, the United Nations Security Council, by Resolution 2288 (2016), decided to terminate, with immediate effect, the arms embargo with regard to the situation in Liberia. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 25 May 2016, the United Nations Security Council, by Resolution 2288 (2016), decided to terminate, with immediate effect, the arms embargo with regard to the situation in Liberia.

| (2) | On 20 June 2016 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/994 repealing Common position 2008/109/CFSP concerning restrictive measures imposed against Liberia. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 20 June 2016 the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/994 repealing Common position 2008/109/CFSP concerning restrictive measures imposed against Liberia.

| (3) | Regulatory action at Union level is necessary, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulatory action at Union level is necessary,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Council Regulation (EC) No 234/2004 (2) is repealed.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 20 June 2016.

For the Council

The President

F. MOGHERINI

---

(1)  See page 21 of this Official Journal.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 234/2004 of 10 February 2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Liberia and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1030/2003 (OJ L 40, 12.2.2004, p. 1).

2

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5115 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5115

 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain controllers for 
  electric power assisted braking systems, designed for use in hybrid 
                               vehicles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2008

 Mr. Hulshof introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain controllers for 
  electric power assisted braking systems, designed for use in hybrid 
                               vehicles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN CONTROLLERS FOR ELECTRIC POWER ASSISTED BRAKING 
              SYSTEMS, DESIGNED FOR USE IN HYBRID VEHICLES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.95 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain controllers for 
electric power assisted braking systems, designed for use in hybrid 
vehicles) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
McLEAN v. McLEAN

No. COA03-1154.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed November 2, 2004.

Certification Date November 22, 2004.

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Reversed and remanded.
#### In the Matter of Peter Psyllos, Respondent, v Gina Psyllos, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 903]

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lynaugh, J.), entered January 10, 2005, which denied, without a hearing, her motion (1) to vacate an order of the same court entered November 30, 2004, granting the father’s petition for custody of the subject children, upon her default, and (2) to dismiss the petition for lack of personal jurisdiction.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the order entered November 30, 2004, is vacated, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The record supports the mother’s contention that she was not properly served with the petition. The father was directed to serve the petition personally upon the mother. The father’s proof of service consisted only of a United Parcel Service tracking document. Since personal jurisdiction was not obtained, the Family Court erred in denying the mother’s motion *(see Laurenzano v Laurenzano,*222 AD2d 560 [1995]; *Community State Bank v Haakonson,*94 AD2d 838 [1983]). Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Agency Liaison Information

General 

• Liaisons facilitate their agency’s cooperation with OSC investigations by ensuring the agency 

timely responds to OSC’s requests for information and by making sure agency employees are 

available to provide testimony. Liaisons may also facilitate settlement discussions.

• Liaisons should not have involvement in the personnel action(s) at issue in a case. A liaison 

who, for example, provided counsel on the underlying personnel action is not appropriate.

• Liaisons should share the identity of an OSC complainant and the details of an investigation 

only on an as-needed basis.

• Liaisons should discuss any concerns about their role with the OSC staff assigned to the case.

Requests for Information and Documents 

• Liaisons must act so that an agency preserves information and documents relevant to OSC’s 

investigation. If relevant documents cannot be produced because they were lost or destroyed, 

the agency must provide a detailed explanation as to what happened.

• Liaisons should work with the agency’s Information Technology department, rather than 

individual employees, to conduct all responsive searches for electronic information and 

documents.

• Liaisons should not share OSC’s full request for information or other case-related documents

with witnesses or subjects as such actions could compromise the integrity of the investigation. 

Rather, liaisons should share only specific parts of the request on an as-needed basis to obtain 

the information and documents requested.

• If liaisons believe their agency cannot meet the deadline for responding to OSC’s request for 

information and documents, they should request an extension in advance and provide a detailed 

explanation.

• If liaisons believe that OSC’s requests are too broad or involve classified information, they 

should discuss their concerns with the OSC staff assigned to the case. 

Interviews 

• Liaisons may not be present during OSC interviews. 

Rev. 3/2020

U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
Exhibit 4.9      CONSENT OF ISABELLE ROY   Reference is made to the Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended February 28, 2014 (the Annual Report) of Virginia Mines Inc. (the Company), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.  I, Isabelle Roy, participated in the preparation of the technical entitled Technical Report and Recommendations, 2013 Exploration Program, Coulon Project, Quebec Mines Virginia Inc., December 2013 concerning mineralized material in the Coulon property for the Company. Portions of the Report are summarized under headings Item III  Description of the Business  3.1.4 Geological Setting; 3.1.5 Exploration and Drilling; and 3.1.6 Mineralization in the Annual Information Form of the Company for the year ended February 28, 2014 (included as Exhibit 1 of the Annual Report, which Exhibit is incorporated by reference herein).  I hereby consent to the inclusion of the foregoing written disclosure and to the references to such disclosure and to my name under the foregoing heading and to all other references to such disclosure and to my name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report.   Very truly yours,


| |                                   |  | 
| | --------------------------------- |  | 
| | /S/
Isabelle Roy                  |  | 
| | Name:
Isabelle Roy, B.Sc., P.Geo. |  | 

May 15, 2014
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, et al., Petitioners, v. James OWENS, et al.

No. 19-634

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### In the Matter of Mitsuhiro Honzawa, Appellant, v Hiro Enterprises USA, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[800 NYS2d 707]

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Paula J. Omansky, J.), entered May 13, 2004, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Business Corporation Law §§ 1104 and 1104-a to dissolve respondent corporations, granted respondents’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 to dismiss the petition, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Petitioner, whose prior dissolution proceeding was dismissed on the basis of his admission that he was not a shareholder of record of any of the subject corporations *(Honzawa Holding Co. v Hiro Enter. USA,*291 AD2d 318 [2002]), now claims entitlement to such relief as a shareholder of the subject corporations’ Japanese parent companies.

The motion court correctly found that during years of complex litigation in Japan, the litigants had ample notice and opportunity to be heard. Petitioner’s ownership claims were, following these years of litigation, clearly rejected by the Japanese Supreme Court.

Petitioner’s claim in this litigation is precluded by the doctrine of comity because a Japanese court of last resort ruled that petitioner is not such a shareholder *(see Matter of Gotlib v Ratsutsky,*83 NY2d 696, 699-700 [1994]; *Greschler v Greschler,*51 NY2d 368, 376 [1980]). We reject petitioner’s argument that *767respondents’ principals should be estopped from denying his shareholder status in the parent companies because of contrary representations they made in federal and state tax returns. Assuming the Japanese court was not advised of the tax returns, petitioner fails to allege, much less demonstrate, any extrinsic fraud that prevented him from doing so. The same is true of the forgeries and other alleged intrinsic frauds that petitioner claims misled the Japanese court *(see Altman v Altman,*150 AD2d 304, 306-307 [1989], *lv denied*74 NY2d 612 [1989]). We have considered and rejected petitioner’s other arguments for not extending comity to the Japanese judgment. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5470 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5470

To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the carriage of all 
  local television signals by satellite carriers in all local markets.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2008

  Mr. Stupak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to require the carriage of all 
  local television signals by satellite carriers in all local markets.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SATELLITE CARRIAGE OF ALL LOCAL TELEVISION SIGNALS IN ALL 
              LOCAL MARKETS REQUIRED.

    (a) National Local-to-Local.--Section 338(a)(1) of the 
Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 338(a)(1)) is amended by striking 
``within that local market'' and inserting ``within any local market''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 338(a) of such Act (47 U.S.C. 
338(a)) is amended by striking ``(3) Effective date.--'' and all that 
follows through ``2002.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 shall be effective on February 17, 
2009.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal L 32I/2023

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 032I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 664 February 2023 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 032I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 664 February 2023

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2023/250 of 4 February 2023 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/251 of 4 February 2023 amending Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine | 4 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/252 of 4 February 2023 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine | 11 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2023/250 of 4 February 2023 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/251 of 4 February 2023 amending Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

4

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/252 of 4 February 2023 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

11

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Marc L. Reisch           
|                      |  | Marc L. Reisch               
|                      |  | President and                
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |  | (principal executive officer)
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of National Beef Packing Company, LLC (the Company)on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 30, 2009 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Miller,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

|   |   |                                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| By:    |   | /s/ John R. Miller                      |
|   |   |                                    |
|   |   | John R. Miller*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: July 10, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tradestar Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Frederick A. Huttner, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                     /s/ Frederick A. Huttner
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Frederick A. Huttner,
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  May 15, 2006