U.S. Department of Defense

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Revised Version

October 2023

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation 

(OLDCC) partnered with the Library of Congress’s Federal Research Division (FRD) to produce this 

report. FRD’s analytical team includes Vega Bharadwaj, Katarina David, Zachary Ham, Sarah 

McNeal, Noah Milstein, Nathaniel Reynolds, Liam Sims, and Alan Stone. Anastasia Forbes 

managed this project for OLDCC and provided input throughout the report’s development.

This research benefited from the guidance of staff at the DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center, 

the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and the Congressional Research Service. Experts at the 

American Enterprise Institute, Brookings Institution, Center for a New American Security, and 

Center for Strategic and International Studies generously offered feedback on earlier versions of 

this report. 

Please direct any questions or suggestions for future reports via email to: 

Tara Butler 

Principal, Intergovernmental and Stakeholder Engagement

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, U.S. Department of Defense 

tara.a.butler4.civ@mail.mil

An electronic copy of this report is located online at https://oldcc.gov/dsbs-fy2022.
2 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgments............................................. 1

Introduction .................................................. 3

State and District of Columbia Summary Table.................... 7

How to Read This Report...................................... 10

United States Overview ....................................... 14

State and District of Columbia Profiles......................... . 18

Appendix 1: Military Installations.............................. 120

Appendix 2: Methodology .................................... 127
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 3

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of a state-by-state analysis 

of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) contract, grant, 

and personnel spending during fiscal year (FY) 2022. 

The report’s graphs, maps, and tables present a range 

of findings, such as total spending figures, categories of 

contracted goods and services, major defense contractors, 

and numbers and types of defense personnel. State and 

local officials may use this information to assess a region’s 

dependence on defense spending and to target assistance 

to support more resilient communities and companies.

Conducted between March 2023 and September 2023, 

the analysis primarily entailed an examination of DoDfunded prime and sub award contract data and defense 

personnel and payroll figures. This report also marks the 

first time that DoD-funded grant prime and sub-grant 

awards have been incorporated into the state-level 

analysis of total defense spending. Findings are drawn 

from an array of sources, including the DoD’s Defense 

Manpower Data Center and USAspending.gov, which is 

managed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. 

FY 2022 Overview

The DoD’s budget authority increased from $719.5 billion 

in FY 2021 to $795.7 billion in FY 2022.1 DoD contract 

obligations, grant obligations, and payroll spending in all 

50 states and the District of Columbia totaled $558.7 

billion, approximately $1,676 per U.S. resident and 2.2 

percent of the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) 

(see table 1). Contracts for various products and services 

totaled $389.5 billion, thus comprising the majority of the 

spending, while DoD personnel payroll accounted for 

$159.4 billion, and DoD grant spending accounted for $9.7 

billion.

Most contract funds went to supplies and equipment 

(such as aircraft, ships, weapons, and parts; 50 percent) 

and services (37 percent), with research and development 

(9 percent) and construction (3 percent) comprising the 

remainder. The largest portion of personnel pay was for 

active duty military (46 percent), followed by civilians (40 

percent), the National Guard (8 percent), and the Reserves 

(6 percent). Grant awards for FY 2022 were analyzed at the 

state level only.

Total defense spending ranged from $552 million in 

Vermont to $62.7 billion in Virginia, with a median value 

of $6.3 billion per state among the 50 states and the 

District of Columbia.

1

 Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2024 (Washington, DC: May 2023): page 152-153, https://comptroller.

defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2024/FY24_Green_Book.pdf.

 RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions)

Virginia $62.7

2 Texas $58.0

3 California $56.2

4 Florida $30.2

5 New York $28.1

6 Maryland $26.4

7 Connecticut $22.3

8 Pennsylvania $17.9

9 Massachusetts $15.2

10 Arizona $15.0

Total for Top Ten States $332.2

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $558.7

Table 1: Top 10 States by Total Defense Spending

 RANK STATE PERCENTAGE

Virginia 9.7

2 Hawaii 8.9

3 Connecticut 6.9

4 District of Columbia 6.7

5 Alaska 6.3

6 Maryland 5.6

7 Kentucky 5.3

8 Alabama 5.0

9 Maine 4.3

10 Mississippi 4.1

Table 2: Top 10 States by Defense Spending as Percentage of State GDP 

1

1
4 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

Approximately 59 percent of the DoD’s $558.7 billion went 

to 10 states (see table 1). On average, defense spending 

comprised 2.5 percent of a state’s GDP. Several states that 

exceeded this average, however, were not among the top 

recipients of total defense spending, including Hawaii

(8.9 percent of state GDP), the District of Columbia (6.7 

percent), Alaska (6.3 percent), Kentucky (5.7 percent), 

Alabama (5.0 percent), Maine (4.3 percent), and 

Mississippi (4.1 percent; see table 2).

Further review shows that some states received substantial

funds for contract, grant, and personnel spending, while 

other states received relatively high amounts in only

one. Specifically, California, Maryland, Texas, and Virginia 

were all among the top ten recipients of defense contracts, 

grants, and personnel spending. In addition, all of the 

states that were among the top ten recipients of defense 

contract funds were also among the top ten states for 

overall defense spending (see table 3).

Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, North Carolina, and 

Washington were among the largest recipients of defense 

personnel spending, but were not among the top states 

for overall defense spending (see table 4). 

Similarly, Michigan, New Jersey, and Washington were 

among the top recipients of defense grant awards, but

were not among the top states for overall defense 

spending (see table 5). 

By contrast, Florida, which was among the top recipients 

of both defense contracts and personnel spending, was 

not among the top ten recipients of DoD-funded grant 

awards.

Table 5: Top 10 States by Defense Grant Spending

 RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (millions)

1 California $867.2

2 Michigan $722.1

3 New York $711.5

4 Maryland $626.4

5 Pennsylvania $495.2

6 Massachusetts $463.9

7 New Jersey $404.4

8 Virginia $394.1

9 Texas $340.6

10 Washington $319.4

Total for Top Ten States $5,344.7 

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $9,703.7

An Excel-formatted workbook featuring metrics from the 

FY 2022 report is located at https://oldcc.gov/dsbs-fy2022.

Appendix 2 contains additional details on this report’s 

research methodology.

 RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions)

1 Texas $45.6

2 Virginia $42.0

3 California $38.1

4 New York $24.5

5 Florida $21.5

6 Connecticut $21.4

7 Maryland $17.5

8 Pennsylvania $14.3

9 Massachusetts $13.6

10 Arizona $12.6

Total for Top Ten States $251.0

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $389.5

Table 3: Top 10 States by Defense Contract Spending

 RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions)

1 Virginia $20.3

2 California $17.2

3 Texas $12.1

4 Florida $8.5

5 Maryland $8.4

6 North Carolina $7.6

7 Washington $7.4

8 Georgia $7.2

9 Hawaii $5.3

10 Colorado $3.9

Total for Top Ten States $98.0

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $159.4

Table 4: Top 10 States by Defense Personnel Spending
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 5

DATA/PUBLICATION SOURCE PERTINENT INFORMATION

USAspending.gov U.S. Department of the Treasury

Prime- and sub-award contract and 

grant spending on defense-related 

goods and services

Defense Manpower Data Center U.S. Department of Defense Personnel counts as of September 30, 

2022 and gross payroll figures

Gross Domestic Product by State, 

Fourth Quarter and Annual 2022

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau 

of Economic Analysis State gross domestic product totals

2022 National and State Population 

Estimates

U.S. Department of Commerce, Census 

Bureau State and national population figures

DoD Product Service Code Selection 

Tool U.S. Department of Defense Spending categories

HUD USPS ZIP Code Crosswalk Files: 

ZIP-County Crosswalk

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban 

Development Counties corresponding to ZIP codes

Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas U.S. Department of Defense Military installations by state and 

county

Data Sources and Publications Used in This Analysis
This page intentionally left blank
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

SUMMARY TABLE

The following table shows U.S. Department of Defense 

(DoD) contract, grant, and personnel spending data for all 

50 states and the District of Columbia (listed alphabetically) 

in fiscal year (FY) 2022, which can be used to provide 

information and statistics about various topics, such as:

• The importance of defense spending for a state’s

economy (Columns 1 and 3).

• How that spending compares to other states and the

country overall (Columns 2, 11, and 12).

• The association between defense spending and a state’s

economic reliance on defense-related employment and

industries (Columns 4-10).

The columns show the following variables:

1. Defense Spending as a Share of GDP identifies the total

amount of defense spending (i.e., contracts, grants, and

payroll) per state as a share of that state’s GDP. This

provides an indication of the degree to which a state’s

economic health depends on such funding and how

vulnerable a state is to DoD spending changes.

2. State Share of Total U.S. Defense Spending calculates

each state’s share of total defense spending (contract

obligations, grant awards, and payroll in the 50 states

plus the District of Columbia), which helps to identify

the largest and smallest recipients of DoD funding.

3. Defense Spending per Resident is the amount DoD

spent per resident in a state or the District of Columbia

on defense contracts, grants, and payroll. Like “Defense

Spending as a Share of GDP,” it shows a state’s relative

dependence on and vulnerability to changes in this

type of support.

4. Total Contract, Grant, and Payroll Spending is the sum

of all DoD contract obligations, grant awards, and

payroll in a state or the District of Columbia.

5. Total Contract Spending shows the amount DoD

obligated to contracts in a given state or the District

of Columbia.

6. Grant Spending is the total amount DoD awarded as

grants in a given state or the District of Columbia.

7. Total Payroll is the gross pay received by active duty,

civilian, National Guard, and Reserve personnel with

an assigned or duty location in a state or the District of

Columbia during FY 2022. These figures, as well as

those in columns 8-10, do not include benefits for

current or former defense personnel.

8. Civilian Pay shows the total gross pay to DoD civilian

personnel in FY 2022.

9. Military Active Duty Pay equals the total gross pay to

active duty personnel in FY 2022.

10. National Guard & Reserve Pay refers to the total gross

pay received by National Guard and Reserve personnel

in FY 2022.

11. Ranking by Defense Spending as a Share of State GDP

indicates a state’s placement among the 50 states and

the District of Columbia with respect to the total

amount of defense spending (i.e., contracts, grants, and

payroll) as a share of that state’s GDP.

12. Ranking by Total Defense Spending likewise indicates

a state’s placement among the 50 states and the

District of Columbia.

Detailed information on the methodology for these

statistics is included in appendix 2.

7
8 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

DEFENSE SPENDING 

AS A SHARE OF GDP 

(%)

STATE SHARE OF 

TOTAL U.S. DEFENSE 

SPENDING 

(%)

DEFENSE SPENDING 

PER RESIDENT 

($)

TOTAL CONTRACT, 

GRANT, AND 

PAYROLL SPENDING 

($ billions)

TOTAL CONTRACT

SPENDING

($ billions) ($ millions)

Alabama 5.0 2.5 2,750 14.0 10.3 231.7 

Alaska 6.3 0.7 5,460 4.0 2.0 73.5 

Arizona 3.3 2.7 2,033 15.0 12.6 131.2 

Arkansas 0.7 0.2 383 1.2 0.3 73.8 

California 1.6 10.1 1,440 56.2 38.1 867.2 

Colorado 2.7 2.3 2,215 12.9 8.8 213.0 

Connecticut 6.9 4.0 6,150 22.3 21.4 116.1 

Delaware 0.8 0.1 729 0.7 0.2 71.8 

District of Columbia 6.7 1.9 16,144 10.8 8.0 141.3 

Florida 2.2 5.4 1,359 30.2 21.5 245.6 

Georgia 1.8 2.4 1,226 13.4 6.0 158.6 

Hawaii 8.9 1.6 6,081 8.8 3.2 182.5 

Idaho 0.7 0.1 401 0.8 0.2 66.3 

Illinois 1.0 1.8 811 10.2 7.5 223.6 

Indiana 1.9 1.5 1,264 8.6 7.0 182.7 

Iowa 1.0 0.4 698 2.2 1.8 67.7 

Kansas 1.7 0.7 1,248 3.7 1.5 75.2 

Kentucky 5.3 2.5 3,084 13.9 10.6 79.2 

Louisiana 1.2 0.6 719 3.3 1.4 60.6 

Maine 4.3 0.7 2,625 3.6 2.7 59.5 

Maryland 5.6 4.7 4,289 26.4 17.5 626.4 

Massachusetts 2.2 2.7 2,184 15.2 13.6 463.9 

Michigan 1.2 1.4 756 7.6 5.5 722.1 

Minnesota 0.4 0.4 345 2.0 1.2 127.4 

Mississippi 4.1 1.0 1,928 5.7 3.9 98.9 

Missouri 2.3 1.6 1,437 8.9 7.2 64.5 

Montana 1.0 0.1 592 0.7 0.2 80.0 

Nebraska 1.1 0.3 870 1.7 0.6 77.6 

Nevada 1.4 0.5 932 3.0 1.6 45.5 

New Hampshire 1.6 0.3 1,173 1.6 1.3 38.8 

New Jersey 1.3 1.7 1,013 9.4 7.0 404.4 

New Mexico 3.8 0.8 2,173 4.6 3.0 91.3 

New York 1.4 5.0 1,430 28.1 24.5 711.5 

North Carolina 1.8 2.4 1,255 13.4 5.6 248.4 

North Dakota 1.3 0.2 1,182 0.9 0.2 41.0 

Ohio 1.1 1.6 759 8.9 5.1 201.5 

Oklahoma 2.9 1.2 1,730 7.0 3.5 66.3 

Oregon 0.4 0.2 277 1.2 0.5 89.3 

Pennsylvania 1.9 3.2 1,382 17.9 14.3 495.2 

Rhode Island 2.3 0.3 1,497 1.6 0.7 62.1 

South Carolina 2.1 1.1 1,186 6.3 3.2 93.5 

South Dakota 1.6 0.2 1,169 1.1 0.6 26.8 

Tennessee 0.6 0.6 437 3.1 1.8 114.1 

Texas 2.5 10.4 1,932 58.0 45.6 340.6 

Utah 2.5 1.1 1,801 6.1 4.1 85.0 

Vermont 1.4 0.1 853 0.6 0.3 38.2 

Virginia 9.7 11.2 7,223 62.7 42.0 394.1 

Washington 2.0 2.6 1,874 14.6 6.9 319.4 

West Virginia 0.6 0.1 338 0.6 0.2 69.0 

Wisconsin 0.9 0.6 581 3.4 2.7 112.5 

Wyoming 1.3 0.1 1,059 0.6 0.2 33.4 

U.S. Average/Total 2.2 100.0 1,676 558.7* 389.5 9,703.7 

1 2 3 4 5

* These figures do not total $558.7 billion due to rounding.

6

TOTAL GRANT

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 9

TOTAL PAYROLL

($ billions)

CIVILIAN PAY

($ billions)

MILITARY ACTIVE 

DUTY PAY

($ billions)

NATIONAL GUARD 

& RESERVE PAY

($ billions)

RANKING BY DEFENSE 

SPENDING AS A SHARE OF 

STATE GDP 

RANKING BY TOTAL 

DEFENSE 

SPENDING

Alabama 3.5 2.3 0.6 0.5 8 12

Alaska 1.9 0.4 1.3 0.2 5 30

Arizona 2.3 0.7 1.1 0.4 12 10

Arkansas 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.3 47 43

California 17.2 5.9 9.7 1.6 29 3

Colorado 3.9 1.0 2.4 0.5 14 16

Connecticut 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.2 3 7

Delaware 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.1 45 47

District of Columbia 2.7 1.5 0.9 0.2 4 17

Florida 8.5 2.8 4.5 1.2 20 4

Georgia 7.2 2.6 3.8 0.8 26 15

Hawaii 5.3 1.9 3.0 0.4 2 22

Idaho 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 46 46

Illinois 2.4 1.0 0.9 0.6 42 18

Indiana 1.5 1.0 0.1 0.4 24 23

Iowa 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.3 43 37

Kansas 2.1 0.5 1.3 0.3 27 31

Kentucky 3.3 0.7 2.2 0.4 7 13

Louisiana 1.8 0.5 0.9 0.5 38 34

Maine 0.9 0.7 0.0 0.1 9 32

Maryland 8.4 5.2 2.5 0.6 6 6

Massachusetts 1.2 0.6 0.2 0.4 19 9

Michigan 1.4 0.9 0.1 0.4 37 24

Minnesota 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.5 50 38

Mississippi 1.7 0.7 0.6 0.4 10 28

Missouri 1.6 0.5 0.7 0.4 18 21

Montana 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 41 48

Nebraska 1.0 0.3 0.5 0.2 40 39

Nevada 1.4 0.2 0.9 0.2 31 36

New Hampshire 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 30 41

New Jersey 2.0 1.1 0.5 0.5 35 19

New Mexico 1.5 0.5 0.9 0.1 11 29

New York 2.9 0.8 1.2 0.9 32 5

North Carolina 7.6 1.7 5.3 0.5 25 14

North Dakota 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.1 36 45

Ohio 3.6 2.4 0.5 0.6 39 20

Oklahoma 3.4 1.9 1.2 0.3 13 25

Oregon 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.3 51 42

Pennsylvania 3.1 2.2 0.2 0.7 23 8

Rhode Island 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 17 40

South Carolina 3.0 0.9 1.7 0.5 21 26

South Dakota 0.4 0.1 0.2 0.1 28 44

Tennessee 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.5 48 35

Texas 12.1 3.8 6.8 1.5 15 2

Utah 1.9 1.3 0.3 0.3 16 27

Vermont 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 33 51

Virginia 20.3 9.9 9.4 1.0 1 1

Washington 7.4 2.6 4.3 0.5 22 11

West Virginia 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.2 49 50

Wisconsin 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.4 44 33

Wyoming 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 34 49

U.S. Average/Total 159.4 64.0 73.4 22.0 N/A N/A

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USAspending.gov; U.S. Bureau of 

Economic Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

7 8 9 10 11 12
10 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Austal $748.1 M

Northrop Grumman $692.6 M

Boeing $657.5 M

M1 Support Services $539.4 M

Torch Technologies $504.8 M

SAIC $500.4 M

Lockheed Martin $462.6 M

Parsons Corp. $274.9 M

Defense Systems and Solutions $249.0 M

Radiance Technologies, Inc. $219.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

ALABAMA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

49,895

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Madison 683 13,856 415 684 15,638

Montgomery 2,646 3,145 2,740 2,055 10,586

Dale 3,314 2,220 28 155 5,717

Calhoun 42 3,024 947 308 4,321

Jefferson 267 355 1,942 1,582 4,146

Mobile 58 814 694 655 2,221

Tuscaloosa 23 92 269 241 625

Lee 68 24 172 346 610

Houston ND 37 312 76 ND

Coffee ND 142 264 0 ND

Construction: 2% Research and

Development: 29%

Service: 39%

Supplies and

Equipment: 31% 

Active Duty: 15%

Civilian: 48%

National 

Guard: 24%

Reserve: 13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

51%

12%

11%

26%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

71%

2%

18%

8%

$5.1

$8.0 $7.3

$10.6 $9.8 $9.2

$10.6 

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#12 #8 2.5% $2,750 #12 #13 #18 #12

$14.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

5.0% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$10.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

49,895 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$231.7 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$10.3

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

A

D

E

B

C

F

I

G

H

J

K L M N O P Q R
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 11

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

The following information briefly describes the statistics listed in the state profiles throughout this report. A listing of 

military installations by state and county can be found in appendix 1. More detailed information on the methodology is 

included in appendix 2.

Defense Contracts refers to U.S. Department of 

Defense (DoD) obligations through DoD-funded 

contracts during fiscal year (FY) 2022 (i.e., October 1, 

2021 through September 30, 2022). All contract data 

are from USAspending.gov and include prime awards 

the DoD made to private- and public-sector 

contractors, as well as sub-awards that prime-award 

recipients provided to subcontractors.

Defense Contracts, By Type represents the 

proportions of total prime and sub-award obligations 

in a state that went to four product and service 

categories: construction, research and development,

service, and supplies and equipment. The DoD’s 

Product Service Code Selection Tool was used to 

categorize spending on the products and services 

identified by the product service code listed in each 

prime award record.

Defense Contracts, By Service is the percentage of 

defense contract spending that was funded by the 

Military Services or Other Defense activities. This 

category includes the Office of the Secretary of 

Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Inspector General 

(DoD), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 

Defense Agencies, and the Defense Field Activities. 

These figures include prime awards and sub-awards 

since both records have fields that identify the 

federal agency that funded the award.

Top Defense Contractors lists the private- and publicsector contractors that were among the ten largest 

recipients of DoD obligations in a state or the District 

of Columbia.

Contract Awards Performed by Fiscal Year

represents the total value of defense contract awards 

in a state or the District of Columbia for each fiscal 

year from FY 2015 through FY 2022.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

A Defense Personnel includes the total numbers of 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel in a state or the District of Columbia on 

September 30, 2022. Defense payroll figures are the 

total gross pay received by those personnel in FY 

2022. The states and counties refer to the duty 

locations for active duty and civilian personnel.

National Guard and Reserve personnel figures are 

based on assigned locations.

Allocations, By Type indicates the proportion of total 

number defense personnel with an assigned or duty 

location in a state or the District of Columbia who 

were active duty, civilian, National Guard, or Reserve 

personnel on September 30, 2022.

Allocations, By Service represents a snapshot of the 

proportion of total number defense personnel across 

the Military Services and other DoD activities with an 

assigned or duty location in a state or the District of 

Columbia on September 30, 2022.

Total Payroll and Personnel is the total gross pay 

during FY 2022 and count of all active duty, civilian, 

National Guard, and Reserve personnel with an 

assigned or duty location in a state or the District of 

Columbia on September 30, 2022. Pension payments 

and other benefits are not included in the payroll 

figure.

Top Defense Personnel Locations lists the ten counties 

(or independent cities) with the highest numbers of 

defense personnel reported on September 30, 2022. 

Personnel numbers are not disclosed—indicated by 

“ND”—for counties in which the numbers of active 

duty, civilian, or National Guard and Reserve personnel 

are ten or fewer to protect those individuals’ 

personally identifiable information.

D

B

C

E

G

H

I

J

F

DEFENSE PERSONNEL
12 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Madison

Morgan

Calhoun

Lee

Dale

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Madison

Morgan

Calhoun

Jefferson

Tuscaloosa Shelby

Montgomery

Dale

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALABAMA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Madison

Dale

Mobile

Montgomery

Calhoun

Talladega

Tuscaloosa

Jefferson

Morgan

Shelby

(M = millions, B = billions)

$7.3 B

$884.0 M

$861.5 M

$483.7 M

$249.6 M

$75.4 M

$68.4 M

$59.3 M

$42.0 M

$28.9 M

Madison

Montgomery

Dale

Calhoun

Jefferson

Mobile

Lee

Tuscaloosa

Coffee

Morgan

$1.7 B

$644.6 M

$437.9 M

$226.8 M

$163.4 M

$101.7 M

$25.8 M

$18.4 M

$15.9 M

$10.5 M

Jefferson

Tuscaloosa

Montgomery

Talladega

Mobile

Mobile

Coffee

S

T
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 13

$ Spent in State is the combined total of defense 

contract obligations, grants, and personnel spending 

in a state or the District of Columbia during FY 2022. 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia.

% of State GDP represents the combined total of 

defense contract obligations, grants, and personnel 

spending as a proportion of a state or the District of 

Columbia’s GDP in FY 2022. The state’s GDP is the 

total value of all goods and services produced in a 

given fiscal year. The ranking above this statistic 

indicates a state’s placement among the 50 states and 

the District of Columbia.

% of Total U.S. Defense Spending is the combined 

total of defense contract obligations, grants, and 

personnel spending in a state or the District of 

Columbia as a proportion of the DoD’s contract, 

grants, and personnel spending in all 50 states and 

the District of Columbia in FY 2022.

$ per Resident highlights the combined total defense 

contract obligations, grants, and personnel spending 

in a state or the District of Columbia divided by its

overall population. These population figures are July 

1, 2022 estimates provided by the U.S. Census 

Bureau.

Contract Spending is the total value of contracts the 

DoD obligated for products and services in a state or 

the District of Columbia during FY 2022. The ranking 

above this statistic indicates a state’s placement 

among the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Grant Spending is the total value of grant awards the 

DoD obligated to recipients in a state or the District of 

Columbia during FY 2022. The ranking above this 

statistic indicates a state’s placement among the 50 

states and the District of Columbia.

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

K

L

M

N

O

P

Number of Personnel indicates the total number of 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel with an assigned or duty location in a state 

or the District of Columbia on September 30, 2022. 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia.

Personnel Spending totals the gross pay received by 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel with an assigned or duty location in a state 

or the District of Columbia during FY 2022. This figure 

does not include pension payments or other benefits. 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia. 

Top Defense Contract Spending Locations lists and 

shows the ten counties (or independent cities) in a 

state with the highest defense contract obligations in 

FY 2022. For states with fewer than ten counties, all 

counties are identified. The District of Columbia is the 

only jurisdiction represented by a single location.

Top Defense Personnel Spending Locations lists and 

shows the ten counties (or independent cities) within 

a state with the highest gross pay received by active 

duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve personnel 

during FY 2022. For states with fewer than ten 

counties, all counties are identified. The District of 

Columbia is the only jurisdiction represented by a 

single location.

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

S

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS

T

Q

SUMMARY BAR

R
14 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

Contract Spending

Total Spending as % of State GDP

Top 10 States by Contract Spending

Billions

$15.0 to $62.7

$8.9 to $14.6

$4.0 to $8.9

$1.6 to $3.7

$0.5 to $1.6

Virginia $62.7

Texas $58.0

California $56.2

Florida $30.2

New York $28.1

Maryland $26.4

Connecticut $22.3

Pennsylvania $17.9

Massachusetts $15.2

Arizona $15.0

 Top 10 States by Total Spending

 as % of GDP

Virginia 9.7

Hawaii 8.9

Connecticut 6.9

District of Columbia 6.7

Alaska 6.3

Maryland 5.6

Kentucky 5.3

Alabama 5.0

Maine 4.3

Mississippi 4.1

Total Spending Top 10 States by Total Spending 

(billions)

 Percentage

4.1 to 9.7

2.2 to 3.8

1.6 to 2.1

1.1 to 1.4

0.4 to 1.0

Texas $45.6

Virginia $42.0

California $38.1

New York $24.5

Florida $21.5

Connecticut $21.4

Maryland $17.5

Pennsylvania $14.3

Massachusetts $13.6

Arizona $12.6

(billions)

Billions

$12.6 to $45.6

$6.0 to $10.6

$2.7 to $5.6

$0.7 to $2.7

$0.2 to $0.6

UNITED STATES

FISCAL YEAR 2022

 DC

 DC

 DC

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USAspending.gov; U.S. Bureau of 

Economic Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 15

UNITED STATES

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Grant Spending Top 10 States by Grant Spending

California $867

Michigan $722

New York $712

Maryland $626

Pennsylvania $495

Massachusetts $464

New Jersey $404

Virginia $394

Texas $341

Washington $319

 Millions

$319 to $867

$141 to $248

$85 to $131

$66 to $80

$27 to $66

(millions)

 DC

Personnel Spending Top 10 States by Personnel Spending

Billions

$3.9 to $20.3

$2.3 to $3.6

$1.4 to $2.1

$0.7 to $1.4

$0.2 to $0.6

Virginia $20.3

California $17.2

Texas $12.1

Florida $8.5

Maryland $8.4

North Carolina $7.6

Washington $7.4

Georgia $7.2

Hawaii $5.3

Colorado $3.9

 (billions)

 DC

Personnel Numbers Top 10 States by Personnel Numbers

California 273

Virginia 247

Texas 215

North Carolina 137

Florida 132

Georgia 124

Washington 109

Maryland 94

Hawaii 69

South Carolina 65

 Thousands

65 to 273

40 to 65

25 to 37

13 to 25

4 to 13

(thousands)

 DC
16 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $44.5 B

Raytheon Technologies $25.4 B

General Dynamics $21.5 B

Pfizer, Inc. $16.7 B

Boeing $14.2 B

Northrop Grumman $12.8 B

Humana $7.7 B

L3Harris Technologies $6.2 B

Huntington Ingalls $6.1 B

BAE Systems $4.9 B

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

UNITED STATES

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$159.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

2,596,057

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

San Diego, CA 84,638 23,437 1,003 7,999 117,077

Norfolk City, VA 49,691 16,903 316 1,215 68,125

Honolulu, HI 33,508 19,768 4,569 3,922 61,767

Cumberland, NC 46,607 10,220 628 2,153 59,608

El Paso, CO 31,780 8,865 1,043 4,662 46,350

Pierce, WA 30,108 6,860 3,016 5,008 44,992

Onslow, NC 35,006 3,876 142 365 39,389

Bell, TX 32,181 5,161 665 974 38,981

El Paso, TX 24,653 3,748 1,118 1,980 31,499

Construction: 5% Research and

Development: 7%

Service: 34%

Supplies and

Equipment: 54% 

Active Duty: 43%

Civilian: 28%

National 

Guard: 16%

Reserve: 13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

22%

38%

20%

20%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

44%

29%

23%

4%

$558.7 B 2.2% $1,679 $390.5 B $9.7 B 2.6 M $159.4 B

TOTAL SPENT OF GDP PER RESIDENT CONTRACT 

SPENDING

NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

GRANT 

SPENDING

$209.1 $250.7

$311.0 $341.0

$382.9 $389.5

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

$257.3

$350.7

Bexar, TX 32,993 22,640 2,669 9,200 67,502
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

□ AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS EB □ • 0 ♦ * 

UNITED STATES FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2022 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Hartford

New London

New York

Fairfax

Jefferson

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions) (B = billions) (M=millions)

Tarrant, TX

Fairfax, VA

New York, NY

San Diego, CA

Dallas, TX

New London, CT

Los Angeles, CA

Pima, AZ

Hartford, CT

Jefferson, KY

(B = billions) 

Pierce

El Paso

Fairfax

District of Columbia

Cumberland

$18.6 B 

$17.8 B 

$17.2 B 

$11.9 B 

$9.8 B 

$9.7 B 

$9.3 B 

$8.6 B 

$8.1 B 

$8.0 B 

San Diego, CA

Norfolk City, VA

Honolulu, HI

Bexar, TX

El Paso, CO

$7.4 B 

$5.1 B 

$4.8 B 

$4.3 B 

Cumberland, NC

$4.2 B 

$3.2 B 

Pierce, WA

$3.0 B 

District of Columbia

$2.7 B 

Bell, TX

$2.4 B 

Fairfax, VA

$2.3 B 

San Diego

Los Angels

Pima

Tarrant

Dallas

San Diego 

Honolulu 

Bell

Bexar

Norfolk City

17
18 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Austal $748.1 M

Northrop Grumman $692.6 M

Boeing $657.5 M

M1 Support Services $539.4 M

Torch Technologies $504.8 M

SAIC $500.4 M

Lockheed Martin $462.6 M

Parsons Corp. $274.9 M

Defense Systems and Solutions $249.0 M

Radiance Technologies, Inc. $219.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

ALABAMA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

49,895

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Madison 683 13,856 415 684 15,638

Montgomery 2,646 3,145 2,740 2,055 10,586

Dale 3,314 2,220 28 155 5,717

Calhoun 42 3,024 947 308 4,321

Jefferson 267 355 1,942 1,582 4,146

Mobile 58 814 694 655 2,221

Tuscaloosa 23 92 269 241 625

Lee 68 24 172 346 610

Houston ND 37 312 76 ND

Coffee ND 142 264 0 ND

Construction: 2% Research and

Development: 29%

Service: 39%

Supplies and

Equipment: 31% 

Active Duty: 15%

Civilian: 48%

National 

Guard: 24%

Reserve: 13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

51%

12%

11%

26%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

71%

2%

18%

8%

$5.1

$8.0 $7.3

$10.6 $9.8 $9.2

$10.6 

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#12 #8 2.5% $2,750 #12 #13 #18 #12

$14.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

5.0% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$10.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

49,895 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$231.7 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$10.3
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Madison

Morgan

Calhoun

Lee

Dale

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Madison

Morgan

Calhoun

Jefferson

Tuscaloosa Shelby

Montgomery

Dale

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALABAMA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Madison

Dale

Mobile

Montgomery

Calhoun

Talladega

Tuscaloosa

Jefferson

Morgan

Shelby

(M = millions, B = billion)

$7.3 B

$884.0 M

$861.5 M

$483.7 M

$249.6 M

$75.4 M

$68.4 M

$59.3 M

$42.0 M

$28.9 M

Madison

Montgomery

Dale

Calhoun

Jefferson

Mobile

Lee

Tuscaloosa

Coffee

Morgan

$1.7 B

$644.6 M

$437.9 M

$226.8 M

$163.4 M

$101.7 M

$25.8 M

$18.4 M

$15.9 M

$10.5 M

Jefferson

Tuscaloosa

Montgomery

Talladega

Mobile

Mobile

Coffee

19
20 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Arctic Slope Regional Corp. $253.5 M

Brice Turnagain JV $176.7 M

Doyon Ltd. $103.3 M

Peter Kiewit Sons', Inc. $69.1 M

ARCTEC Alaska JV $59.2 M

Brookfield Business Partners, LP $56.0 M

Ciqima Federal Services, LLC $52.7 M

Brice Engineering, LLC $44.9 M

Environmental Chemical Corp. $38.1 M

Usibelli Coal Mine $35.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

ALASKA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.9 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

28,452

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Location Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Anchorage 9,580 3,210 2,588 714 16,092

Fairbanks North Star 8,786 1,819 737 77 11,419

Southeast Fairbanks 16 302 210 0 528

Denali 17 28 112 0 157

Matanuska-Susitna ND ND 102 ND ND

Kodiak Island 19 19 ND 0 ND

Juneau ND 11 ND 0 ND

Kenai Peninsula ND ND ND 0 ND

Ketchikan Gateway 0 ND ND 0 ND

Nome 0 ND 0 0 ND

Construction: 12% Research and

Development: 2%

Service: 70%

Supplies and

Equipment: 17%

Active Duty: 65%

Civilian: 19%

National 

Guard: 13%

Reserve: 3%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

46%

8%

27%

19%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

49%

1%

48%

3%

#30 #5 0.7% $5,460 #32 #36 #27 #23

$4.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

6.3% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$2.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

28,452 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$73.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$1.3 $1.3 $1.4

$1.7 $1.8

$1.4 $1.6

$2.0

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 21

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Matanuska−Susitna

Anchorage Kenai Peninsula

Juneau

Kodiak Island

Ketchikan Gateway

Southeast Fairbanks

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

North Slope

Fairbanks North Star

Sitka

Aleutians West

Yakutat

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALASKA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Anchorage

Fairbanks North Star

Aleutians West

Southeast Fairbanks

Denali

Kenai Peninsula

Sitka

Yakutat

North Slope

Aleutians East

(K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

$1.0 B

$451.4 M

$264.3 M

$149.8 M

$27.3 M

$15.6 M

$12.5 M

$12.4 M

$12.4 M

$9.8 M

Anchorage

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Denali

Kodiak Island

Matanuska-Susitna

Kenai Peninsula

Juneau

Ketchikan Gateway

Sitka

$1.1 B

$750.8 M

$46.6 M

$14.6 M

$3.2 M

$2.8 M

$820.4 K

$784.0 K

$467.9 K

$6.7 K

Denali

Anchorage

Fairbanks North Star

Denali

Southeast Fairbanks

Kenai Peninsula

Aleutians East

Sitka
22 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Raytheon Technologies $8.2 B

Northrop Grumman $855.3 M

Honeywell $642.7 M

Boeing $584.9 M

General Dynamics $393.1 M

Nammo $119.8 M

Jacobs $112.6 M

Trax International $103.6 M

Iridium Communications, Inc. $86.1 M

Airborne Tactical Advantage Co., LLC $53.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

ARIZONA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.3 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

41,502

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Maricopa 4,862 2,387 3,799 4,985 16,033

Pima 6,177 2,770 2,434 1,588 12,969

Cochise 2,986 2,547 117 182 5,832

Yuma 3,164 1,285 49 36 4,534

Pinal ND 134 518 456 ND

Coconino 17 39 405 ND ND

Yavapai 20 ND 175 0 ND

Navajo ND ND 31 0 ND

Graham 0 0 32 0 32

Mohave ND ND 0 0 ND

Construction: 1% Research and 

Development: 13%

Service: 16%

Supplies and

Equipment: 70%

Active Duty: 42%

Civilian: 22%

National 

Guard: 18%

Reserve: 17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

31%

26%

21%

21%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

37%

14%

45%

4%

$5.3

$7.5

$10.0 $11.8

$17.3

$8.9

$12.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#10 #12 2.7% $2,033 #10 #21 #19 #20

$15.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

3.3% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$12.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

41,502 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$131.2 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$10.7
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 23

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Navajo

Mohave

Yavapai

Maricopa

Graham Yuma Pinal

Pima

Cochise

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

La Paz

Greenlee

Cochise

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ARIZONA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Pima

Maricopa

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Coconino

Greenlee

Yavapai

La Paz

Mohave

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$8.6 B

$3.1 B

$669.5 M

$239.5 M

$14.5 M

$10.2 M

$1.6 M

$1.2 M

$446.8 K

$254.5 K

Pima

Maricopa

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Coconino

Yavapai

Mohave

Navajo

Graham

$768.4 M

$739.4 M

$437.5 M

$246.7 M

$26.2 M

$12.5 M

$5.4 M

$845.2 K

$750.2 K

$494.1 K

Coconino

Y avapai

Mohave

Maricopa

Yuma Pinal

Pima

Coconino
24 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

General Dynamics $89.7 M

TransDigm Group $46.0 M

HGL Construction, Inc. $16.3 M

Kimball & Thompson Produce Co. $15.4 M

Custom Mechanical Systems Corp. $12.6 M

PPG Industries $9.6 M

Enviro Systems, Inc. $6.8 M

SES Construction and Fuel Services, LLC $5.9 M

Stryten Energy, LLC $5.6 M

Wolfspeed, Inc. $5.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

ARKANSAS

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$758.5 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

17,997

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Pulaski 3,557 1,950 3,075 1,371 9,953

Sebastian 15 316 1,336 82 1,749

Jefferson 13 700 128 0 841

Benton ND 37 650 121 ND

Craighead ND 19 253 74 ND

Washington 23 ND 326 0 ND

Union ND ND 59 207 ND

Faulkner 12 31 85 122 250

Crittenden ND 0 243 0 ND

Pope ND 60 116 ND ND

Construction: 5%

Research and

Development: 3%

Service: 33%

Supplies and

Equipment: 60%

Active Duty: 21%

Civilian: 20% National 

Guard: 48%

Reserve: 12%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

45%

6%

38%

12%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

59%

2%

38%

1%

#43 #47 0.2% $383 #45 #35 #35 #38

$1.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.7% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

17,997 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$73.8 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$0.5

$0.3

$0.2

$0.3 $0.3

$0.5

$0.6

$0.3

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 25

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Craighead

Pope

Faulkner

Pulaski

Garland

Jefferson

Union

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Benton

Washington

Sebastian

Pulaski

Jefferson

Miller

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ARKANSAS

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Pulaski

Calhoun

Ouachita

Benton

Jefferson

Sebastian

Washington

Columbia

Faulkner

Miller

(M = millions)

$106.0 M

$90.0 M

$46.6 M

$20.7 M

$19.0 M

$13.7 M

$10.9 M

$6.8 M

$4.8 M

$4.3 M

Pulaski

Sebastian

Jefferson

Benton

Washington

Garland

Faulkner

Craighead

Pope

Union

$510.6 M

$63.6 M

$51.9 M

$15.1 M

$13.3 M

$8.0 M

$7.6 M

$7.5 M

$6.7 M

$6.1 M

Benton

Washington

Sebastian

Faulkner

Ouachita

Calhoun

Columbia
26 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Centene Corp. $3.5 B

Northrop Grumman $3.1 B

General Dynamics $2.3 B

Lockheed Martin $2.2 B

General Atomics $2.0 B

iHealth Labs, Inc. $1.8 B

Boeing $1.7 B

Raytheon Technologies $1.5 B

Aerospace Corp. $1.0 B

SpaceX $756.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

CALIFORNIA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$17.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

272,971

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

San Diego 84,638 23,437 1,003 7,999 117,077

San Bernardino 11,927 3,161 757 359 16,204

Ventura 4,356 5,802 1,204 991 12,353

Los Angeles 1,377 3,404 3,126 4,364 12,271

Solano 6,865 1,621 263 3,201 11,950

Kern 2,595 8,348 230 297 11,470

Riverside 472 2,788 1,314 4,628 9,202

Monterey 4,583 3,750 67 460 8,860

Kings 6,934 850 0 433 8,217

Orange 502 1,101 2,186 3,625 7,414

Construction: 3% Research and

Development: 13%

Service: 48%

Supplies and

Equipment: 36%

Civilian: 23% Active Duty: 58%

National 

Guard: 7%

Reserve: 13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

13%

33%

30%

24%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

16%

66%

14%

3%

$27.6 $27.3

$32.6 $35.6 $36.7 $32.8

$38.1

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#3 #29 10.1% $1,440 #3 #1 #1 #2

$56.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.6% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$38.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

272,971 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$17.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$867.2 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$38.7
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 27

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Kern

Riverside

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Kern

San Bernardino

CALIFORNIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions (M=millions) (M=millions))

FISCAL YEAR 2022

San Diego

Los Angeles

Santa Clara

Sacramento

Orange

Ventura

Kern

Alameda

Monterey

San Bernardino

(M = millions, B = billions)

$11.9 B

$9.3 B

$4.7 B

$3.9 B

$1.3 B

$962.4 M

$886.7 M

$684.8 M

$622.2 M

$598.9 M

San Diego

Ventura

Kern

San Bernardino

Solano

Monterey

Los Angeles

Kings

Riverside

Yuba

$7.4 B

$1.0 B

$998.2 M

$829.5 M

$772.8 M

$715.8 M

$671.1 M

$525.2 M

$471.4 M

$367.5 M

Los Angeles

Ventura

Orange

Alameda

Monterey

San Diego

Sacramento

Santa Clara

Monterey

Ventura

San Diego

Los Angeles

San Bernardino

Kings

Yuba

Solano
28 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $3.0 B

United Launch Alliance $1.1 B

Sierra Nevada Corp. $513.5 M

Raytheon Technologies $369.6 M

L3Harris Technologies $359.6 M

Jacobs $303.3 M

Bechtel Group $232.2 M

Veritas Capital Fund Management, LLC $150.7 M

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. $87.9 M

Tlingit Haida Tribal Business Corp. $80.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

COLORADO

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.9 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

59,917

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

El Paso 31,780 8,865 1,043 4,662 46,350

Arapahoe 1,935 1,350 2,300 1,714 7,299

Denver 318 280 419 611 1,628

Adams 15 117 315 1,008 1,455

Weld 11 92 497 109 709

Jefferson 40 206 0 355 601

Pueblo 26 380 142 0 548

Boulder 93 65 188 ND ND

Larimer 41 13 105 ND ND

Montrose ND 0 125 0 ND

Construction: 2% Research and

Development: 29%

Service: 50%

Supplies and

Equipment: 19% 

Civilian: 20% Active Duty: 57%

National 

Guard: 9%

Reserve: 14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

9%

14%

62%

16%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

59%

4%

33%

5%

$4.5 $5.0 $5.7 $5.7 $6.2 $6.9 $7.7

$8.8

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#16 #14 2.3% $2,215 #13 #15 #11 #10

$12.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.7% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$8.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

59,917 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$213.0 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 29

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Weld

Adams

Arapahoe

El Paso

Pueblo

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Adams

Arapahoe

Mesa

El Paso

Pueblo

COLORADO FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2022

El Paso

Douglas

Arapahoe

Denver

Pueblo

Jefferson

Boulder

Larimer

Adams

Mesa

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.9 B

$2.7 B

$1.8 B

$512.4 M

$258.3 M

$200.4 M

$166.0 M

$161.2 M

$94.8 M

$27.0 M

El Paso

Arapahoe

Denver

Adams

Pueblo

Jefferson

Weld

Boulder

Douglas

Larimer

$3.2 B

$408.1 M

$84.0 M

$51.5 M

$38.6 M

$32.5 M

$25.5 M

$21.2 M

$11.0 M

$7.9 M

Larimer

Boulder 

Denver Jefferson

Douglas

Larimer

Boulder 

Douglas

Jefferson

Denver

(M = millions, B = billions)
30 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

General Dynamics $9.5 B

Raytheon Technologies $7.9 B

Lockheed Martin $3.3 B

Gartner $42.4 M

PCX Aerosystems $32.3 M

Sonalysts $31.3 M

Emprise Corp. $31.3 M

Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. $27.3 M

Triumph Group, Inc. $26.6 M

Hartford Provision Co. $22.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

CONNECTICUT

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$819.9 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

14,785

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

New London 3,876 1,528 1,093 321 6,818

Hartford 70 788 2,203 489 3,550

Middlesex ND 70 617 370 ND

New Haven 69 62 493 275 899

Fairfield 22 188 208 343 761

Tolland 46 ND 37 0 ND

Litchfield ND 13 0 0 ND

Windham 0 ND 0 0 ND

Construction: 0%

Research and Development: 2% Service: 7%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 90%

Active Duty: 37%

Civilian: 18%

National 

Guard: 32%

Reserve: 12%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

4%

83%

11%

2%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

38%

49%

9%

4%

$10.9 $12.7

$7.6

$14.3

$18.2

$21.6

$17.8

$21.4

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#7 #3 4.0% $6,150 #6 #23 #38 #37

$22.3 B SPENT 

IN STATE

6.9% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$21.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

14,785 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$116.1 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 31

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

CONNECTICUT FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

New London

Hartford

Fairfield

New Haven

Litchfield

Middlesex

Windham

Tolland

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$9.7 B

$8.1 B

$3.5 B

$79.9 M

$26.4 M

$13.6 M

$10.0 M

$8.3 M

New London

Hartford

Fairfield

New Haven

Middlesex

Tolland

Litchfield

Windham

$442.9 M

$155.9 M

$40.1 M

$30.6 M

$29.8 M

$3.9 M

$955.8 K

$592.4 K

Litchfield

Hartford

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven

Litchfield

Hartford

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven
32 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

J.D. Eckman, Inc. $45.9 M

SNA International $20.4 M

Dawson Enterprises, LLC $16.7 M

Herman JCG Co. JV $13.6 M

University of Delaware $12.1 M

Caesar Rodney School District $10.6 M

Weston Solutions Holdings $9.7 M

Custom Mechanical Systems Corp. $4.6 M

Phase Sensitive Innovations $4.4 M

Tesla Industries $4.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

DELAWARE

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$456.2 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

9,816

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Kent 3,384 995 141 1,530 6,050

New Castle 45 437 2,055 640 3,177

Sussex ND 24 469 70 ND

Construction: 8%

Research and

Development: 21%

Service: 60%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 11% 

Active Duty: 35%

Civilian: 15%

National 

Guard: 27%

Reserve: 23%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

29%

8%

30%

34%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

25%

3%

70%

2%

#47 #45 0.1% $729 #48 #37 #45 #44

$0.7 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.8% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

9,816 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$71.8 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$0.2

$0.1

$0.2

$0.1

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 33

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 DELAWARE

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

(M = millions)

$110.2 M

$102.9 M

$1.7 M

Kent

New Castle

Sussex

$331.5 M

$110.6 M

$12.5 M

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

New Castle

Kent

Sussex
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Huntington Ingalls $469.7 M

Leidos $436.1 M

Government of the United States $428.4 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $395.8 M

Deloitte $355.8 M

CACI $259.9 M

ManTech $222.2 M

Serco Group, PLC $214.2 M

IBM $206.1 M

Parsons Corp. $203.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.7 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

25,565

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

District of Columbia 8,876 13,174 2,339 1,176 25,565

Construction: 3%

Research and

Development: 8%

Service: 79%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 11% 

Active Duty: 35%

Civilian: 52%

National 

Guard: 9%

Reserve: 5%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

13%

48%

18%

22%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

18%

61%

18%

3%

$3.8 $3.8 $4.1 $4.7 $4.1 $4.9

$6.9

$8.0

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#17 #4 1.9% $16,144 #14 #20 #29 #18

$10.8 B SPENT 

IN STATE

6.7% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$8.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

25,565 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$141.3 M GRANT 

SPENDING

34
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 35

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2022

District of Columbia

$8.0 B

District of Columbia

$2.7 B

(B = billions)

District of Columbia

District of Columbia

(B = billions)
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $4.1 B

Abbott Laboratories $1.9 B

Northrop Grumman $1.6 B

Hensel Phelps Construction $742.6 M

BL Harbert Holdings, LLC $604.8 M

Crowley $544.5 M

Leonardo SpA $503.5 M

General Dynamics $426.5 M

L3Harris Technologies $415.9 M

Webuild $360.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

FLORIDA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$8.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

132,265

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Okaloosa 18,450 7,579 108 2,462 28,599

Duval 13,815 8,795 1,935 3,891 28,436

Escambia 11,505 2,519 181 1,010

Hillsborough 5,693 2,842 483 4,173 13,191

Bay 2,667 3,007 531 238 6,443

Miami-Dade 1,090 1,277 351 3,539 6,257

Orange 235 2,483 365 3,089 6,172

Brevard 1,511 2,535 401 1,384 5,831

Pinellas 55 294 900 1,008 2,257

Palm Beach 58 237 432 1,132 1,859

Construction: 10%

Research and

Development: 5%

Service: 37%

Supplies and

Equipment: 49%

Active Duty: 47%

Civilian: 26%

National 

Guard: 9%

Reserve: 18%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

30%

29%

24%

17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

40%

34%

3%

$8.7

$18.4

$21.5

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#4 #20 5.4% $1,359 #5 #12 #5 #4

$30.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.2% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$21.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

132,265 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$8.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$245.6 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$13.7 $13.4 $14.8

$19.8

$17.5

36

15,215
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FLORIDA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Orange

Brevard

Hillsborough

Bay

Duval

Okaloosa

Pinellas

Escambia

Miami-Dade

Broward

(M = millions, B = billions)

$5.7 B

$4.5 B

$2.7 B

$2.5 B

$1.8 B

$1.3 B

$668.4 M

$624.4 M

$558.4 M

$205.2 M

Okaloosa

Duval

Hillsborough

Escambia

Bay

Brevard

Orange

Miami-Dade

Santa Rosa

Monroe

$2.2 B

$2.0 B

$908.4 M

$804.6 M

$520.5 M

$390.1 M

$360.8 M

$320.4 M

$136.9 M

$106.9 M

37

Bay

Escambia Okaloosa

Bay

Escambia Okaloosa

Santa Rosa

Duval

Orange

Brevard Pinellas

Hillsborough

Broward

Miami-Dade

Duval

Orange

Brevard

Hillsborough

Miami-Dade

Monroe
38 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $1.4 B

Georgia Tech Research Corp. $557.1 M

International Auto Logistics $162.7 M

Northrop Grumman $126.9 M

VMLY&R $115.3 M

RQ Construction, LLC $110.7 M

General Dynamics $105.8 M

State of Georgia $83.6 M

Envistacom $77.6 M

ACC Construction $72.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

GEORGIA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$7.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

124,079

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Muscogee 18,180 4,237 462 648 23,527

Houston 3,215 14,605 1,162 1,365 20,347

Liberty 15,600 2,484 532 118 18,734

Richmond 10,757 3,426 541 1,520 16,244

Cobb 284 1,242 2,869 3,211 7,606

Chatham 4,252 1,165 1,635 378 7,430

Lowndes 4,330 523 73 247 5,173

Camden 2,455 2,519 0 ND ND

Clayton 45 519 459 2,273 3,296

Dougherty 336 1,826 94 108 2,364

Construction: 8%

Research and

Development: 9%

Service: 48%

Supplies and

Equipment: 35%

Active Duty: 51%

Civilian: 28%

National 

Guard: 11%

Reserve: 10%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

29%

15%

41%

14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

60%

11%

24%

5%

$5.0

$9.1

$5.8 $5.9 $6.1

$7.7

$6.6 $6.0

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#15 #26 2.4% $1,226 #20 #19 #6 #8

$13.4 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.8% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$6.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

124,079 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$7.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$158.6 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 39

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 GEORGIA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Cobb

Fulton

Houston

Richmond

Camden

Chattahoochee

Chatham

Glynn

Liberty

Gwinnett

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.6 B

$1.0 B

$782.9 M

$425.1 M

$416.8 M

$350.9 M

$209.1 M

$171.2 M

$166.7 M

$151.2 M

Houston

Muscogee

Liberty

Richmond

Chatham

Camden

Cobb

Lowndes

Dougherty

Clayton

$1.5 B

$1.2 B

$1.1 B

$1.1 B

$425.2 M

$338.8 M

$318.7 M

$304.2 M

$162.9 M

$138.6 M

Fulton

Cobb Gwinnett

Chattahoochee

Richmond

Houston

Liberty

Glynn

Chatham

Camden

Clayton

Cobb

Richmond

Muscogee

Lowndes

Houston

Dougherty

Chatham

Camden

Liberty
40 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Holdco Sands, LLC $224.6 M

Hensel Phelps Construction $186.8 M

Nan, Inc. $121.9 M

AECOM $107.7 M

Koa Lani JV, LLC $78.9 M

Insight Pacific $68.5 M

TAT Technologies, Ltd. $58.9 M

Huntington Ingalls $55.6 M

Innovative Management Concepts, Inc. $53.3 M

Pacific Shipyards International $50.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

HAWAII

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$5.3 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

68,754

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Honolulu 33,508 19,768 4,569 3,922 61,767

Hawaii ND 180 377 61 ND

Kauai 81 175 157 42 455

Maui 18 62 212 ND ND

Construction: 7%

Research and

Development: 7%

Service: 81%

Supplies and

Equipment: 6%

Active Duty: 57% Civilian: 29%

National 

Guard: 8%

Reserve: 6%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

25%

60%

8%

8%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

35%

46%

14%

5%

$1.5

$1.9 $1.9 $2.1 $2.4 $2.3 $2.5

$3.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#22 #2 1.6% $6,081 #27 #18 #9 #9

$8.8 B SPENT 

IN STATE

8.9% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$3.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

68,754 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$5.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$182.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 HAWAII

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions (M=millions) (M=millions))

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Honolulu

Kauai

Hawaii

Maui

(M = millions, B = billions)

$3.1 B

$92.0 M

$71.4 M

$25.3 M

Honolulu

Kauai

Hawaii

Maui

$4.8 B

$34.0 M

$26.9 M

$13.0 M

41

Maui

Hawaii

Kauai

Honolulu

Kauai

Honolulu

Maui

Hawaii
42 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Brad Hall & Associates $66.3 M

PKL Services $27.3 M

Aviation Specialties Unlimited, Inc. $10.0 M

Tanadgusix Corp. $9.5 M

Milpower $7.8 M

Lightforce $6.2 M

General Dynamics $6.0 M

HDR, Inc. $4.5 M

C-2 Construction, Inc. $3.3 M

LBYD Federal, LLC $3.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

IDAHO

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$487.7 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

10,354

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Ada 60 894 2,666 608 4,228

Elmore 3,339 444 209 31 4,023

Kootenai ND 78 197 89 ND

Bannock ND 13 212 127 ND

Canyon 13 12 233 0 258

Twin Falls ND ND 85 59 ND

Bonneville 23 24 101 0 148

Jerome 0 ND 113 0 ND

Cassia 0 ND 83 0 ND

Clearwater 15 47 18 0 80

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 7%

Service: 40%

Supplies and

Equipment: 52%

Active Duty: 34%

Civilian: 15%

National 

Guard: 42%

Reserve: 9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

11%

11%

37%

41%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

43%

4%

52%

1%

$0.2

$0.1

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#46 #46 0.1% $401 #47 #41 #44 #43

$0.8 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.7% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

10,354 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$66.3 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 43

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 IDAHO

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ( M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Elmore

Bonneville

Ada

Kootenai

Canyon

Clearwater

Bonner

Twin Falls

Bingham

Bannock

(M = millions)

$78.5 M

$72.2 M

$38.5 M

$9.8 M

$8.5 M

$6.3 M

$2.4 M

$1.7 M

$1.6 M

$1.1 M

Elmore

Ada

Kootenai

Bannock

Canyon

Bonneville

Clearwater

Twin Falls

Bonner

Latah

$250.7 M

$160.2 M

$14.5 M

$13.2 M

$8.9 M

$6.8 M

$5.3 M

$4.6 M

$3.7 M

$3.4 M

Clearwater

KootenaiKootenai

Bonner

Elmore

Canyon

Ada

Twin Falls

Bonneville

Bannock

Bingham

Kootenai

Latah Clearwater

Bonner

Elmore

Canyon

Ada

Twin Falls

Bonneville

Bannock
44 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

BP $1.7 B

Northrop Grumman $849.5 M

W.S. Darley & Co. $603.3 M

Cardinal Health $416.5 M

Omnicom Group, Inc. $362.1 M

SupplyCore $340.6 M

DMS Pharmaceutical $260.9 M

Patriot Team $237.6 M

FedEx $217.9 M

AAR $164.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

ILLINOIS

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

58,423

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Lake 16,944 1,518 216 3,833 22,511

St. Clair 4,505 3,837 1,048 1,695 11,085

Rock Island 365 4,154 363 372 5,254

Cook 329 737 2,330 1,799 5,195

Sangamon 39 538 2,103 ND ND

Peoria 22 370 1,693 380 2,465

Will 21 78 87 564 750

Champaign 27 330 281 73 711

DuPage 99 148 0 445 692

Winnebago 15 31 410 199 655

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 2%

Service: 30%

Supplies and

Equipment: 67%

Active Duty: 39%

Civilian: 21%

National 

Guard: 23%

Reserve: 17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

17%

10%

20%

54%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

41%

37%

20%

2%

$5.0 $5.1 $5.5

$7.1

$6.2 $6.2 $6.4

$7.5

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#18 #42 1.8% $811 #15 #14 #14 #19

$10.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.0% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$7.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

58,423 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$223.6 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 45

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

McLean

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Vermilion

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ILLINOIS

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Cook

St. Clair

DuPage

Lake

Winnebago

Peoria

Rock Island

Williamson

Madison

Vermilion

(M = millions)

$3.6 B

$1.3 B

$876.7 M

$785.0 M

$421.9 M

$161.7 M

$120.4 M

$97.5 M

$54.0 M

$47.8 M

St. Clair

Lake

Rock Island

Cook

Sangamon

Peoria

Champaign

DuPage

McLean

Madison

$790.4 M

$610.1 M

$416.7 M

$179.0 M

$110.5 M

$74.4 M

$37.0 M

$36.3 M

$17.9 M

$14.3 M

Lake

Winnebago

Cook

DuPage Rock Island

Peoria

St. Clair

Williamson

Madison

Lake

Cook

DuPage Rock Island

Peoria

Champaign

Sangamon

St. Clair

Madison
46 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Eli Lilly and Co. $2.8 B

Rolls-Royce $930.0 M

Foundation Medicine, Inc. $579.1 M

KPS Capital Partners, LP $479.1 M

ERAPSCO $262.3 M

Raytheon Technologies $237.6 M

AmeriQual Group $203.4 M

SAIC $180.5 M

Calumet Specialty Products Partners, LP $111.5 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $74.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

INDIANA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

29,952

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Marion 277 4,095 2,306 1,145 7,823

Martin 71 4,907 0 0 4,978

Johnson 307 346 1,426 373 2,452

Miami 18 473 38 1,638 2,167

Allen 24 247 1,364 294 1,929

Vigo 26 123 939 149 1,237

Lake 14 69 473 158 714

Tippecanoe 76 33 412 122 643

Hamilton ND 594 0 0 ND

Vanderburgh 16 29 412 138 595

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 4%

Service: 17%

Supplies and

Equipment: 78%

Active Duty: 3%

Civilian: 40%

National 

Guard: 41%

Reserve: 16%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

59%

24%

8%

9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

52%

19%

14%

15%

$2.7 $2.9 $3.1 $3.0 $3.6 $3.2

$4.9

$7.0

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#23 #24 1.5% $1,264 #18 #17 #26 #29

$8.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.9% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$7.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

29,952 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$182.7 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Hamilton

Hancock

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 INDIANA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Marion

St. Joseph

Martin

Whitley

Vanderburgh

Allen

Daviess

Miami

Lawrence

Bartholomew

(M = millions)

$4.7 B

$545.0 M

$495.1 M

$297.1 M

$210.2 M

$194.3 M

$70.6 M

$58.6 M

$43.5 M

$40.5 M

Martin

Marion

Johnson

Miami

Allen

Hamilton

Vigo

Hancock

Tippecanoe

Lake

$462.1 M

$453.6 M

$108.9 M

$73.2 M

$55.8 M

$52.5 M

$44.3 M

$25.0 M

$20.6 M

$18.6 M

47

Whitley

Allen

St. Joseph

Marion

Daviess

Lawrence

Bartholomew

Martin

Vanderburgh

Miami

Lake

Tippecanoe

Vigo

Miami

Marion

Johnson

Martin

Allen
48 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Raytheon Technologies $1.2 B

Lockheed Martin $214.7 M

BAE Systems $112.4 M

American Ordnance $87.2 M

AI Convoy Topco & CY SCA $35.3 M

Day & Zimmermann Group $18.4 M

Loffredo Gardens, Inc. $11.6 M

General Dynamics $11.1 M

SC Companies, Inc. $9.6 M

Carver Pump Co. $9.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

IOWA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$379.1 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,814

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Polk 90 693 3,282 752 4,817

Woodbury ND 267 1,107 66 ND

Scott 11 210 516 339 1,076

Linn ND 113 217 390 ND

Black Hawk 14 64 365 74 517

Boone 0 60 415 0 475

Johnson 18 32 408 ND ND

Dallas ND 0 74 244 ND

Dubuque ND 38 163 113 ND

Pottawattamie ND 12 215 57 ND

Construction: 0%

Research and 

Development: 5%

Service: 14%

Supplies and

Equipment: 81%

Active Duty: 2%

Civilian: 13%

National Guard: 68%

Reserve: 17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

27%

53%

16%

5%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

79%

3%

18%

1%

$1.1 $1.1 $1.3

$1.7 $1.8 $2.0

$1.7 $1.8

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#37 #43 0.4% $698 #34 #39 #41 #47

$2.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.0% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$1.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,814 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$67.7 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 49

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 IOWA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Linn

Des Moines

Scott

Polk

Muscatine

Johnson

Marion

Bremer

Woodbury

Hancock

(M = millions)

$1.5 B

$120.9 M

$50.9 M

$36.8 M

$26.0 M

$16.8 M

$4.4 M

$2.6 M

$1.2 M

$1.0 M

Polk

Woodbury

Scott

Linn

Boone

Black Hawk

Johnson

Dubuque

Webster

Pottawattamie

$169.4 M

$50.5 M

$33.1 M

$19.5 M

$13.7 M

$13.6 M

$12.7 M

$7.2 M

$6.5 M

$5.6 M

Woodbury

Woodbury

Hancock Bremer

Linn

Linn

Polk Johnson

Polk Johnson

Scott

Muscatine

Des Moines

Marion

Webster

Boone

Pottawattamie

Black Hawk Dubuque

Scott
50 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

General Electric $273.1 M

Textron $187.4 M

Bombardier, Inc. $153.2 M

Leading Technology Composites $110.2 M

Northrop Grumman $75.9 M

Webuild $40.0 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $29.9 M

PCC Ventures $20.1 M

Fort Riley Utility Services, Inc. $18.4 M

FITT Scientific, LLC $17.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

KANSAS

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.1 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

37,263

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Geary 14,525 2,361 128 109 17,123

Sedgwick 2,738 956 1,764 1,590 7,048

Leavenworth 2,982 2,479 302 302 6,065

Shawnee 29 545 1,860 329 2,763

Johnson 29 106 383 377 895

Riley 30 192 264 85 571

Saline ND 48 195 79 ND

Douglas 42 24 105 67 238

Wyandotte ND 36 136 0 ND

Crawford ND ND 141 23 ND

Construction: 6% Research and

Development: 2%

Supplies and Service: 32%

Equipment: 60%

Active Duty: 55%

Civilian: 19%

National 

Guard: 18%

Reserve: 9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

42%

2%

47%

10%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

77%

1%

18%

4%

$0.8 $0.8 $0.8 $0.9

$1.2 $1.1

$1.3

$1.5

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#31 #27 0.7% $1,248 #36 #34 #21 #21

$3.7 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.7% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$1.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

37,263 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$75.2 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 51

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 KANSAS

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Sedgwick

Cowley

Leavenworth

Geary

Johnson

Wyandotte

Shawnee

Labette

Butler

Douglas

(M = millions)

$611.8 M

$273.1 M

$218.3 M

$146.1 M

$77.6 M

$55.3 M

$45.4 M

$17.5 M

$9.9 M

$3.9 M

Geary

Leavenworth

Sedgwick

Shawnee

Johnson

Riley

Saline

Douglas

Wyandotte

Ellis

$991.8 M

$550.2 M

$337.0 M

$110.3 M

$30.5 M

$23.5 M

$11.7 M

$8.0 M

$5.8 M

$4.7 M

Butler

Geary

Shawnee Leavenworth

Johnson

Wyandotte

Douglas

Douglas

Johnson

Wyandotte

Leavenworth Shawnee

Sedgwick

Cowley Labette

Sedgwick

Geary

Riley

Ellis Saline
52 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Humana $7.7 B

Lockheed Martin $668.1 M

Bechtel Group $384.9 M

Boeing $128.9 M

United Parcel Service, Inc. $73.2 M

Raytheon Technologies $70.1 M

Anduril Industries, Inc. $63.4 M

Inverness Technologies, Inc. $60.3 M

SourceAmerica $59.1 M

Global Asset Technologies $53.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

KENTUCKY

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.3 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

56,290

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Christian 27,614 2,337 51 185 30,187

Hardin 6,487 4,401 66 2,190 13,144

Jefferson 137 1,205 1,805 595 3,742

Madison 13 983 640 28 1,664

Franklin 17 284 1,120 0 1,421

Fayette 58 117 278 512 965

Boone 43 17 506 ND ND

Muhlenberg 0 73 332 0 405

Campbell ND 29 0 369 ND

McCracken ND 12 128 187 ND

Construction: 0% 

Research and

Development: 0%

Service: 92%

Supplies and Equipment: 7%

Active Duty: 61% Civilian: 18%

National 

Guard: 14%

Reserve: 8%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

13%

1%

1%

84%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

93%

1%

3%

3%

$5.5 $4.8 $5.7

$7.8

$9.5 $9.4 $9.6 $10.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#13 #7 2.5% $3,084 #11 #32 #16 #14

$13.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

5.3% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$10.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

56,290 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$79.2 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 KENTUCKY

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, (M=millions) (M=millions) B = billions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Jefferson

Fayette

Christian

Hardin

Madison

Boone

Graves

Boyle

Laurel

Wayne

(M = millions, B = billions)

$8.0 B

$854.5 M

$545.5 M

$445.5 M

$404.0 M

$70.3 M

$37.2 M

$36.6 M

$34.1 M

$14.6 M

Christian

Hardin

Jefferson

Madison

Franklin

Fayette

Boone

Muhlenberg

Campbell

McCracken

$1.9 B

$883.0 M

$177.1 M

$89.6 M

$63.1 M

$32.2 M

$14.8 M

$11.1 M

$7.5 M

$7.2 M

53

Jefferson

Hardin

Boone

Jefferson

Hardin

Boone

Franklin

Fayette

Campbell

Madison

Fayette

Madison

McCracken

Christian

Muhlenberg

Christian

Graves

Boyle

Wayne

Laurel
54 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Placid Refining Co. $247.2 M

Conrad Industries, Inc. $88.9 M

Valiant Integrated Services, LLC $51.3 M

Bollinger Shipyards, Inc. $50.2 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $48.5 M

RQ Construction, LLC $36.4 M

Alpha Marine Services, LLC $35.5 M

SLSCO $33.1 M

Gravois Aluminum Boats $32.2 M

Swiftships $25.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

LOUISIANA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.8 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

36,419

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Parish Active

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Vernon 7,264 1,430 95 27 8,816

Bossier 5,055 1,454 140 1,896 8,545

Orleans 1,002 1,786 2,387 2,227 7,402

Rapides 17 381 1,449 ND ND

East Baton Rouge 142 102 558 526 1,328

Tangipahoa ND 100 794 0 ND

Iberville ND 36 817 ND ND

Plaquemines 72 616 0 ND ND

Calcasieu ND 47 324 131 ND

Lafayette 17 50 326 74 467

Construction: 12%

Research and

Development: 3%

Service: 42%

Supplies and

Equipment: 44%

Active Duty: 38%

Civilian: 18%

National 

Guard: 31%

Reserve: 13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

37%

13%

27%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

61%

11%

26%

2%

$1.7 $1.5

$0.8

$1.8

$2.2 $2.4

$1.6 $1.4

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#34 #38 0.6% $719 #37 #44 #22 #25

$3.3 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.2% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$1.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

36,419 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$60.6 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 55

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 LOUISIANA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

West Baton Rouge

Vernon

Orleans

Bossier

St. Mary

Lafourche

St. Tammany

East Baton Rouge

Iberia

Jefferson

(M = millions)

$247.3 M

$244.5 M

$241.1 M

$230.7 M

$118.8 M

$96.0 M

$51.7 M

$39.3 M

$33.5 M

$29.3 M

Vernon

Bossier

Orleans

Rapides

Plaquemines

East Baton Rouge

Tangipahoa

Iberville

Lafayette

Calcasieu

$523.9 M

$518.6 M

$404.8 M

$64.2 M

$38.6 M

$37.5 M

$26.0 M

$22.7 M

$16.6 M

$11.5 M

Bossier

Bossier

Vernon

Vernon

East Baton Rouge

West Baton Rouge

St. Tammany

Orleans

JeffersonJefferson

Jefferson ______

Lafourche

St. Mary

Iberia

East Baton Rouge

Rapides

Tangipahoa

Lafayette Calcasieu

Iberville

Plaquemines

Orleans
56 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

General Dynamics $1.3 B

381 Constructors $417.6 M

Martin's Point Health Care $409.1 M

City of Bangor $49.4 M

Orbis, Inc. $33.2 M

Engineered Construction Services, Inc. $31.1 M

Nas Fuels, LLC $30.8 M

SHV Holdings, NV $28.0 M

Colonnas Ship Yard, Inc. $27.5 M

Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. $27.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

MAINE

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$856.1 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,480

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

York 17 7,159 58 156 7,390

Penobscot 13 364 1,440 150 1,967

Kennebec 13 194 623 ND ND

Aroostook ND 606 79 0 ND

Cumberland 56 75 353 94 578

Sagadahoc 104 327 0 0 431

Androscoggin ND 21 91 105 ND

Washington ND 75 35 0 ND

Oxford 0 0 105 0 105

Somerset 11 ND 57 0 ND

Construction: 24%

Research and

Development: 1%

Service: 25%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 50%

Active Duty: 2%

Civilian: 70%

National 

Guard: 23%

Reserve: 5%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

1%

81%

0%

18%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

20%

63%

10%

7%

$1.3

$1.7

$2.6

$1.2

$3.2

$2.7

$2.1

$2.7

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#32 #9 0.7% $2,625 #31 #45 #42 #36

$3.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

4.3% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$2.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,480 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$59.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 57

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

York

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Knox

Cumberland

Sagadahoc

York

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MAINE

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Sagadahoc

York

Cumberland

Penobscot

Washington

Hancock

Aroostook

Kennebec

Androscoggin

Knox

(M = millions)

$1.3 B

$915.5 M

$429.4 M

$77.0 M

$13.3 M

$12.4 M

$11.3 M

$2.2 M

$1.3 M

$427.7 K

York

Penobscot

Sagadahoc

Kennebec

Aroostook

Cumberland

Androscoggin

Washington

Hancock

Oxford

$609.4 M

$80.1 M

$44.6 M

$41.8 M

$34.0 M

$22.8 M

$6.8 M

$6.5 M

$2.4 M

$2.2 M

Penobscot

Washington

Hancock

Aroostook

Penobscot

Washington

Hancock

Aroostook

Androscoggin

Androscoggin

Kennebec

Cumberland

Sagadahoc

Kennebec

Oxford
58 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Northrop Grumman $1.3 B

Johns Hopkins University $1.2 B

Leidos $685.7 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $489.6 M

BAE Systems $459.1 M

Johns Hopkins Health System Corp. $455.7 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $421.9 M

V2X $378.6 M

Lockheed Martin $375.2 M

TCOM, LP $332.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

MARYLAND

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$8.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

93,930

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Anne Arundel 12,888 9,030 441 3,697 26,056

Prince George's 4,770 4,768 1,007 4,419 14,964

Harford 832 10,762 910 566 13,070

St. Mary's 2,121 10,045 65 18 12,249

Montgomery 4,556 6,348 189 561 11,654

Charles 567 2,380 42 816 3,805

Frederick 1,140 2,274 90 173 3,677

Baltimore 111 374 2,630 503 3,618

Baltimore City 83 981 333 978 2,375

Allegany 1,013 ND 0 89 ND

Construction: 4%

Service: 60%

Supplies and

Equipment: 21%

Active Duty: 30%

Civilian: 50%

National 

Guard: 7%

Reserve: 13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

25%

38%

13%

24%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

36%

36%

16%

11%

$11.6

$16.1

$20.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#6 #6 4.7% $4,289 #7 #4 #8 #5

$26.4 B SPENT 

IN STATE

5.6% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$17.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

93,930 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$8.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$626.4 M GRANT 

SPENDING

Research and 

Development: 14%

$13.3 $13.5

$16.3 $16.6 $17.5
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 59

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

MARYLAND FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, (M=millions) (M=millions) B = billions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Anne Arundel

St. Mary's

Montgomery

Howard

Harford

Prince George's

Baltimore

Baltimore City

Frederick

Charles

(M = millions, B = billions)

$4.5 B

$3.3 B

$2.3 B

$1.9 B

$1.8 B

$1.2 B

$760.7 M

$613.5 M

$513.2 M

$301.4 M

Anne Arundel

Harford

St. Mary's

Montgomery

Frederick

Charles

Baltimore City

Baltimore

Allegany

$2.1 B

$1.4 B

$1.4 B

$1.2 B

Prince George's

$1.2 B

$342.2 M

$301.0 M

$144.9 M

$142.7 M

$93.0 M

Frederick Baltimore Harford

Howard

Baltimore City

Montgomery

Prince George’s

Montgomery

Prince George’s

Frederick Baltimore Harford

Baltimore City

St. Mary’s 

Charles

Anne Arundel

Anne Arundel

Allegany

Charles

St. Mary’s
60 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Raytheon Technologies $3.6 B

Moderna, Inc. $1.8 B

General Electric $1.3 B

Massachusetts Institute of Technology $1.1 B

General Dynamics $780.7 M

Noble Supply & Logistics, LLC $711.9 M

MITRE $403.8 M

Charles Stark Draper Laboratory $376.6 M

Oasis Systems $281.8 M

Lockheed Martin $195.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

MASSACHUSETTS

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

22,076

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Middlesex 1,157 4,630 2,125 1,913 9,825

Hampden 148 982 1,459 2,635 5,224

Barnstable 51 389 1,853 0 2,293

Suffolk 357 287 123 183 950

Worcester 39 81 620 116 856

Bristol 15 53 433 292 793

Plymouth 16 38 350 294 698

Norfolk 18 27 363 202 610

Essex 27 122 360 28 537

Berkshire 13 73 33 0 119

Construction: 3% Research and

Development: 18%

Service: 21%

Supplies and

Equipment: 58%

Active Duty: 9%

Civilian: 30%

National Guard: 35%

Reserve: 26%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

28%

29%

25%

18%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

50%

8%

38%

4%

$3.7

$7.8

$9.7

$12.1 $12.1 $13.3

$18.8

$13.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#9 #19 2.7% $2,184 #9 #6 #33 #32

$15.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.2% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$13.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

22,076 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$463.9 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 61

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

MASSACHUSETTS FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Middlesex

Essex

Bristol

Berkshire

Norfolk

Suffolk

Plymouth

Worcester

Hampshire

Barnstable

(M = millions)

$7.8 B

$3.2 B

$752.2 M

$435.9 M

$427.5 M

$346.7 M

$259.6 M

$135.5 M

$88.5 M

$70.2 M

Middlesex

Hampden

Barnstable

Suffolk

Norfolk

Worcester

Essex

Bristol

Plymouth

Berkshire

$705.4 M

$191.7 M

$97.1 M

$70.0 M

$26.2 M

$25.7 M

$25.2 M

$22.1 M

$18.0 M

$8.7 M

Berkshire Hampshire Worcester

Essex

Middlesex

Suffolk

Norfolk

Bristol Plymouth

Barnstable

Berkshire

Worcester

Hampden

Middlesex

Suffolk

Essex

Norfolk

Bristol Plymouth

Barnstable
62 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

General Dynamics $3.9 B

L3Harris Technologies $139.4 M

Peckham Vocational Industries $112.2 M

Loc Performance Products $111.2 M

Greene Metal Products, Inc. $87.0 M

CRS Acquisition Corp. $79.5 M

AAR $56.9 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $55.7 M

Avon Protection, PLC $49.3 M

Ricardo, PLC $48.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

MICHIGAN

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

25,032

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Macomb 211 6,833 1,400 1,063 9,507

Calhoun 32 1,274 1,016 255 2,577

Wayne 134 363 1,100 446 2,043

Kalamazoo 22 71 925 677 1,695

Clinton ND ND 1,103 120 ND

Kent 52 87 691 260 1,090

Ingham 145 450 144 ND ND

Oakland 23 97 172 427 719

Eaton 11 74 509 ND ND

Washtenaw 58 60 357 111 586

Construction: 0%

Research and 

Development: 6%

Service: 14%

Supplies and Equipment: 80%

Active Duty: 3%

Civilian: 39%

National 

Guard: 42%

Reserve: 16%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

84%

3%

4%

9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

74%

7%

13%

6%

$2.1 $2.7 $2.3

$4.6

$3.4 $3.5

$4.1

$5.5

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#24 #37 1.4% $756 #22 #2 #30 #30

$7.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.2% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$5.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

25,032 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$722.1 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 63

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Clinton

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MICHIGAN

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Macomb

Oakland

Wayne

Washtenaw

Kent

Wexford

Muskegon

Clinton

Ingham

Calhoun

(M = millions)

$4.1 B

$216.2 M

$177.9 M

$161.3 M

$141.2 M

$104.9 M

$90.1 M

$85.3 M

$72.9 M

$60.4 M

Macomb

Calhoun

Wayne

Clinton

Kalamazoo

Ingham

Kent

Oakland

Washtenaw

Eaton

$826.5 M

$154.6 M

$79.0 M

$52.7 M

$41.7 M

$41.1 M

$31.0 M

$24.6 M

$19.5 M

$18.7 M

Wexford

Muskegon

Kent

Calhoun Washtenaw

Calhoun Washtenaw

Wayne

Macomb

Oakland

Ingham

Kent

Kalamazoo

Eaton

Clinton

Ingham Macomb

Wayne

Oakland
64 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Northrop Grumman $352.3 M

BAE Systems $229.9 M

Cummins $92.2 M

TT Electronics, PLC $66.0 M

Raytheon Technologies $45.7 M

UnitedHealth Group $44.4 M

Polaris Industries $30.4 M

3M $21.9 M

Kinetic Protection, LLC $18.7 M

General Dynamics $17.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

MINNESOTA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$658.9 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

20,499

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Hennepin 274 664 1,947 3,415 6,300

Ramsey 24 920 1,751 789 3,484

Morrison ND 423 1,566 0 ND

St. Louis 18 279 1,404 78 1,779

Dakota 16 62 694 0 772

Washington ND 12 666 0 ND

Stearns 12 97 418 103 630

Blue Earth 16 13 218 119 366

Crow Wing ND 21 187 66 ND

Isanti ND ND 237 24 ND

Construction: 2%

Research and

Development: 7%

Service: 12%

Active Duty: 2%

Civilian: 13%

National Guard: 61%

Reserve: 24%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

44%

29%

8%

18%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

72%

5%

21%

1%

$2.7

$3.7 $3.7

$2.2

$1.5 $1.3 $1.2 $1.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#38 #50 0.4% $345 #39 #22 #34 #40

$2.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.4% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$1.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

20,499 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$127.4 M GRANT 

SPENDING

Supplies and Equipment: 79%
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 65

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

St. Louis

Wilkin

MINNESOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Hennepin

Anoka

Dakota

Ramsey

Washington

St. Louis

Sherburne

Olmsted

Morrison

Wilkin

(M = millions)

$650.0 M

$354.7 M

$65.3 M

$33.8 M

$21.2 M

$17.7 M

$13.2 M

$7.2 M

$4.5 M

$2.9 M

Hennepin

Ramsey

St. Louis

Morrison

Dakota

Stearns

Washington

Crow Wing

Blue Earth

Isanti

$243.9 M

$131.9 M

$69.2 M

$53.9 M

$22.7 M

$20.2 M

$13.2 M

$8.0 M

$7.6 M

$5.9 M

Morrison

Sherburne

Anoka

Washington

Ramsey

Hennepin

Dakota

Olmsted

St. Louis

Morrison

Crow Wing

Isanti

Stearns

Hennepin Washington

Ramsey

Dakota

Blue Earth
66 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Huntington Ingalls $1.6 B

ST Engineering $651.8 M

V2X $410.9 M

Raytheon Technologies $176.5 M

Taylor Defense Products, LLC $90.7 M

Olin Corp. $89.0 M

M1 Support Services $75.9 M

Hewlett-Packard $37.7 M

Tyonek Native Corp. $31.4 M

Seemann Composites, Inc. $30.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

MISSISSIPPI

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.7 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

34,747

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Harrison 7,554 2,331 903 2,006 12,794

Warren ND 2,659 143 245 ND

Lauderdale 793 627 1,258 226 2,904

Hinds 33 408 1,365 351 2,157

Lowndes 1,338 591 78 95 2,102

Rankin ND 325 1,572 ND ND

Hancock 473 1,306 52 ND ND

Forrest 307 402 429 218 1,356

Jackson 32 579 128 22 761

Lee ND 104 413 101 ND

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 2%

Service: 23%

Supplies and

Equipment: 73% 

Active Duty: 31%

Civilian: 28%

National 

Guard: 30%

Reserve: 11%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

11%

72%

12%

5%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

41%

23%

35%

2%

$1.6

$2.6

$4.7

$5.4

$4.8

$5.6

$3.6 $3.9

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#28 #10 1.0% $1,928 #25 #26 #23 #26

$5.7 B SPENT 

IN STATE

4.1% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$3.9 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

34,747 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$98.9 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 67

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Winston

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MISSISSIPPI

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Jackson

Madison

Harrison

Warren

Scott

Lowndes

Lafayette

Winston

Hancock

Forrest

(M = millions)

$2.3 B

$394.2 M

$253.0 M

$198.9 M

$176.5 M

$100.8 M

$94.4 M

$90.7 M

$76.0 M

$48.8 M

Harrison

Warren

Hancock

Lowndes

Lauderdale

Hinds

Rankin

Forrest

Jackson

Lee

$613.5 M

$237.6 M

$159.8 M

$143.9 M

$131.5 M

$90.3 M

$67.3 M

$65.6 M

$58.1 M

$20.5 M

Lafayette

Madison

Warren

Warren

Lowndes

Scott

Lowndes

Lee

Forrest

Harrison

Hancock Jackson

Forrest

Jackson

Harrison

Hancock

Rankin

Hinds

Lauderdale
68 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Boeing $4.1 B

Accredo Health Group, Inc. $737.9 M

Olin Corp. $383.8 M

Honeywell $304.4 M

World Wide Technology $276.7 M

J.E. Dunn Construction $155.3 M

Raytheon Technologies $154.6 M

Leonardo SpA $138.7 M

Enersys $69.4 M

PROAIM Americas, LLC $35.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

MISSOURI

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.6 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

39,952

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Pulaski 9,485 3,034 260 377 13,156

Johnson 3,793 1,000 1,101 917 6,811

Jackson 84 848 882 1,429 3,243

St. Louis 83 322 1,570 1,060 3,035

Greene 35 224 859 622 1,740

St. Louis City 235 987 0 462 1,684

Buchanan 16 267 1,154 63 1,500

Cole 18 320 754 69 1,161

St. Charles 15 125 0 789 929

Cass 0 21 0 421 442

Construction: 3% Research and

Development: 3%

Service: 32%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 62%

Active Duty: 36%

Civilian: 20%

National 

Guard: 28%

Reserve: 16%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

15%

26%

38%

21%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

67%

8%

21%

4%

$6.1

$9.4

$5.6

$4.2

$10.5

$11.8

$8.8

$7.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#21 #18 1.6% $1,437 #16 #42 #20 #27

$8.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.3% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$7.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

39,952 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$64.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 69

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Platte

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Dent

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MISSOURI

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

St. Louis

Jackson

Pulaski

Johnson

St. Louis City

Howell

St. Charles

Jasper

Dent

Buchanan

(M = millions)

$5.4 B

$789.9 M

$404.2 M

$140.5 M

$120.8 M

$79.8 M

$38.5 M

$32.1 M

$29.9 M

$20.5 M

Pulaski

Johnson

Jackson

St. Louis

Buchanan

Cole

Greene

Platte

$596.9 M

$335.3 M

$125.9 M

St. Louis City

$110.3 M

$94.1 M

$68.4 M

$63.2 M

$41.3 M

$30.3 M

$12.4 M

Jackson

Johnson

Jasper

Pulaski

Pulaski

Buchanan

Buchanan

Jackson

Johnson

St. Louis

St. Louis City

St. Charles

Howell

St. Louis

St. Louis City

St. Charles

Cole

Greene

St. Charles
70 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

S&K Aerospace $34.3 M

Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes $13.8 M

Corbett Technology Solutions, Inc. $11.1 M

REEL COH, Inc. $11.0 M

TNL Sales, LLC $9.6 M

Northrop Grumman $6.1 M

James Talcott Construction, Inc. $5.8 M

South Texas Lighthouse for Blind, Inc. $5.5 M

Wadsworth Builders Co., Inc. $4.8 M

Montana University System $4.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

MONTANA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$416.2 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

8,708

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Cascade 3,160 840 928 53 4,981

Lewis and Clark ND 380 983 280 ND

Yellowstone 19 20 310 252 601

Missoula 11 25 176 153 365

Gallatin 16 15 181 ND ND

Flathead ND 11 150 12 ND

Silver Bow 11 25 60 51 147

Phillips 0 0 86 0 86

Lincoln 0 44 34 0 78

Park 0 0 65 0 65

Construction: 8% Research and

Development: 5%

Service: 46%

Supplies and

Equipment: 41%

Active Duty: 37%

Civilian: 16%

National 

Guard: 37%

Reserve: 9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

18%

3%

61%

18%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

41%

2%

56%

1%

$0.1

$0.2

$0.1

$0.2

$0.3 $0.3

$0.2 $0.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#48 #41 0.1% $592 #50 #31 #48 #45

$0.7 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.0% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

8,708 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$80.0 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 71

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MONTANA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Cascade

Lake

Flathead

Lincoln

Gallatin

Missoula

Lewis and Clark

Blaine

Yellowstone

Ravalli

(M = millions)

$67.8 M

$48.6 M

$14.0 M

$11.1 M

$6.2 M

$6.1 M

$5.8 M

$2.8 M

$2.1 M

$1.1 M

Cascade

Yellowstone

Gallatin

Missoula

Flathead

Silver Bow

Lincoln

Valley

Park

$267.9 M

Lewis and Clark

$69.4 M

$20.2 M

$12.2 M

$12.0 M

$5.7 M

$5.6 M

$5.6 M

$4.0 M

$2.6 M

Flathead

Flathead

Lewis and Clark

Lewis and Clark

Lincoln

Lincoln

Ravalli

Missoula

Lake

Missoula

Silver Bow

Gallatin

Gallatin

Cascade

Cascade

Yellowstone

Yellowstone

Blaine

Valley

Park
72 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Veritas Capital Fund Management, LLC $104.8 M

M. A. Mortenson Companies, Inc. $68.5 M

SAIC $64.8 M

Northrop Grumman $19.4 M

Calvert Systems Engineering, Inc. $16.7 M

CACI $16.0 M

Spiral Solutions & Technologies, Inc. $15.8 M

Milsup, LLC $14.7 M

FSA Construction $13.5 M

Metgreen Solutions, Inc. $13.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

NEBRASKA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$998.8 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

16,558

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Sarpy 6,329 2,535 96 595 9,555

Lancaster 43 494 2,047 199 2,783

Douglas 85 897 240 541 1,763

Saunders 0 31 726 0 757

Adams 0 17 188 40 245

Hall ND 37 203 0 ND

Buffalo ND ND 153 31 ND

Platte 0 ND 117 44 ND

Dodge 0 ND 0 147 ND

Madison ND ND 95 21 ND

Construction: 16%

Research and

Service: 66% Development: 8%

Supplies and Equipment: 9%

Active Duty: 39%

Civilian: 25%

National 

Guard: 26%

Reserve: 10%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

20%

3%

71%

6%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

35%

4%

59%

1%

$0.7

$0.5

$0.7

$0.6 $0.6

$0.8

$0.6 $0.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#39 #40 0.3% $870 #42 #33 #37 #34

$1.7 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.1% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

16,558 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.0 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$77.6 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 73

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Scotts Bluff

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Gage

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEBRASKA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Sarpy

Douglas

Lancaster

Madison

Thurston

Buffalo

Dawson

Gage

Adams

Saunders

(M = millions)

$537.4 M

$39.5 M

$27.2 M

$4.7 M

$4.3 M

$3.8 M

$2.2 M

$2.1 M

$1.9 M

$1.8 M

Sarpy

Lancaster

Douglas

Saunders

Hall

Buffalo

Adams

Platte

Cedar

Scotts Bluff

$714.5 M

$111.2 M

$103.8 M

$18.1 M

$10.0 M

$8.6 M

$5.7 M

$5.4 M

$3.9 M

$3.4 M

Thurston

Madison

Dawson

Buffalo

Buffalo

Hall

Adams

Adams

Saunders

Douglas

Sarpy

LancasterLancaster

LancasterLancaste

Saunders

Douglas

Sarpy

Platte

Cedar
74 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

AECOM $325.2 M

Sierra Nevada Corp. $254.9 M

Huntington Ingalls $147.0 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $111.6 M

M1 Support Services $87.2 M

Mission Support & Test Services, LLC $68.3 M

Korte Construction Co. (KCC) $39.5 M

Intelligent Waves $36.7 M

Chugach Alaska Corp. $26.2 M

Day & Zimmermann Group $22.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

NEVADA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

23,086

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Clark 11,046 2,034 1,994 3,227 18,301

Washoe 29 333 1,865 ND ND

Churchill 1,115 292 102 236 1,745

Carson City ND 182 502 ND ND

Mineral 0 49 0 0 49

Elko ND ND 25 0 ND

Douglas ND ND 0 0 ND

Storey ND 0 0 0 ND

Lincoln 0 ND 0 0 ND

Lyon 0 ND 0 0 ND

Construction: 4% Research and

Development: 1%

Service: 77%

Active Duty: 53%

Civilian: 13%

National 

Guard: 19%

Reserve: 15%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

17%

20%

58%

4%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

10%

65%

2%

$1.3 $1.3

$1.5 $1.6 $1.6 $1.6 $1.6 $1.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#36 #31 0.5% $932 #35 #46 #32 #31

$3.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.4% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$1.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

23,086 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$45.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING

Supplies and 

Equipment: 18%
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 75

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Elko

Nye

Lincoln

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Humboldt

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEVADA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Clark

Washoe

Churchill

Mineral

Carson City

Storey

Lyon

Douglas

Humboldt

Elko

(K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

$914.3 M

$300.7 M

$273.7 M

$36.4 M

$10.4 M

$10.3 M

$5.9 M

$3.0 M

$747.7 K

$536.8 K

Clark

Churchill

Washoe

Carson City

Mineral

Douglas

Storey

Elko

Nye

Lincoln

$1.1 B

$115.3 M

$75.4 M

$37.0 M

$3.6 M

$902.1 K

$874.8 K

$649.9 K

$101.9 K

$97.7 K

Washoe

Elko

Storey

Churchill

Carson City

Douglas

Storey

Churchill

Carson City

Douglas

Mineral

Lyon

Mineral

Washoe

Clark

Clark
76 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

BAE Systems $698.8 M

L3Harris Technologies $105.8 M

Kettner-Westfalia Jagdreisen Holding GmbH $90.8 M

Safran Group $35.5 M

Port City Air $32.2 M

Creare $29.0 M

Solid State Scientific Corp. $25.8 M

Cerberus Capital Management $16.7 M

Teledyne Technologies $15.3 M

Irving Oil Terminals, Inc. $13.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$291.5 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

6,010

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Rockingham 355 351 1,127 994 2,827

Merrimack ND 208 717 ND ND

Hillsborough 30 185 587 ND ND

Grafton ND 218 182 0 ND

Strafford 15 25 53 237 330

Cheshire ND ND 0 47 ND

Belknap 0 ND 0 0 ND

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 15%

Supplies and Service: 23%

Equipment: 61%

Active Duty: 18%

Civilian: 17%

National Guard: 44%

Reserve: 21%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

26%

22%

37%

15%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

50%

24%

23%

3%

$1.0 $0.9

$1.3

$1.6 $1.7

$1.5

$1.2 $1.3

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#41 #30 0.3% $1,173 #38 #48 #50 #50

$1.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.6% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$1.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

6,010 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$38.8 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 77

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

NEW HAMPSHIRE FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions (M=millions) (M=millions) )

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Hillsborough

Rockingham

Grafton

Sullivan

Belknap

Strafford

Merrimack

Cheshire

Coos

Carroll

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$845.2 M

$340.8 M

$73.9 M

$17.7 M

$15.6 M

$5.5 M

$3.6 M

$3.0 M

$776.8 K

$44.4 K

Rockingham

Merrimack

Hillsborough

Grafton

Strafford

Cheshire

Belknap

$122.4 M

$46.4 M

$38.7 M

$22.7 M

$7.7 M

$2.0 M

$391.3 K

Coos

Grafton

Carroll

Belknap

Merrimack

Rockingham

Cheshire

Sullivan Strafford

Hillsborough

Grafton

Belknap

Merrimack

Rockingham Cheshire

Hillsborough

Strafford
78 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $1.8 B

Merck Group $997.0 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $732.3 M

SAIC $479.9 M

MAG DS Corp. $186.9 M

L3Harris Technologies $181.5 M

CACI $150.7 M

BAE Systems $95.0 M

Frank M. Gargiulo & Son, Inc. $74.9 M

Arctic Slope Regional Corp. $71.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

NEW JERSEY

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.0 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

33,430

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Burlington 5,342 2,733 1,741 6,403 16,219

Morris 83 4,433 602 296 5,414

Ocean 204 2,166 678 47 3,095

Atlantic 19 308 1,354 87 1,768

Monmouth 261 316 686 396 1,659

Bergen 15 23 470 263 771

Hudson 18 103 275 247 643

Camden 29 65 268 254 616

Mercer 29 68 202 281 580

Essex 26 27 397 0 450

Active Duty: 19%

National Civilian: 32%

Guard: 25%

Reserve: 25%

#19 #35 1.7% $1,013 #17 #7 #24 #22

$9.4 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.3% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$7.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

33,430 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.0 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$404.4 M GRANT 

SPENDING

Construction: 2%

Service: 28%

Research and

Development: 15%

Supplies and

Equipment: 55%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

30%

24%

16%

30%

$3.1

$4.9 $4.2

$5.2

$6.2

$4.9

$5.8

$7.0

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

48%

17%

33%

2%
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 79

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

NEW JERSEY FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Burlington

Union

Essex

Morris

Monmouth

Camden

Passaic

Ocean

Somerset

Middlesex

(M = millions)

$3.0 B

$1.1 B

$497.4 M

$493.7 M

$426.6 M

$296.2 M

$249.5 M

$148.6 M

$145.1 M

$135.5 M

Burlington

Morris

Ocean

Monmouth

Atlantic

Mercer

Camden

Hudson

Bergen

Middlesex

$874.0 M

$560.2 M

$272.8 M

$74.9 M

$61.6 M

$23.4 M

$19.4 M

$18.4 M

$17.9 M

$16.3 M

Morris

Somerset

Essex

Union

Middlesex

Passaic

Monmouth

Camden Ocean

Burlington

Hudson

Morris

Bergen

Middlesex

Mercer

Camden

Burlington

Atlantic

Ocean

Monmouth
80 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Honeywell $888.5 M

Fluor Corp. $275.1 M

Mahaffey Tent & Awning Co., Inc. $168.5 M

TRIAD National Security, LLC $152.7 M

Cotton Commercial USA, Inc. $146.9 M

Applied Research Associates $137.8 M

Southwest Range Services $63.3 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $45.6 M

Arctic Slope Regional Corp. $45.5 M

Hensel Phelps Construction $39.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

NEW MEXICO

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

24,575

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Bernalillo 3,358 3,160 1,313 657 8,488

Curry 5,060 476 54 32 5,622

Otero 4,516 908 57 87 5,568

Doña Ana 267 1,727 444 122 2,560

Santa Fe 14 228 550 174 966

Sandoval 0 32 569 0 601

Chaves ND 14 163 ND ND

San Juan ND ND 162 0 ND

Valencia 0 ND 158 0 ND

Rio Arriba 0 12 39 0 51

Construction: 1%

Research and

Development: 14%

Service: 80%

Supplies and

Equipment: 5%

Civilian: 27% Active Duty: 54%

National 

Guard: 15%

Reserve: 4%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

11%

5%

69%

16%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

24%

2%

72%

2%

$2.0 $1.9 $2.2 $2.5

$4.5

$1.9

$1.3

$3.0

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#29 #11 0.8% $2,173 #29 #28 #31 #28

$4.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

3.8% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$3.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

24,575 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$91.3 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 81

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

NEW MEXICO FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Bernalillo

Otero

Doña Ana

Los Alamos

Curry

Santa Fe

Mora

Socorro

Mckinley

Sandoval

(M = millions)

$1.5 B

$846.9 M

$249.5 M

$154.8 M

$118.8 M

$36.5 M

$16.6 M

$15.4 M

$14.1 M

$4.6 M

Bernalillo

Curry

Otero

Doña Ana

Santa Fe

Sandoval

Chaves

Socorro

San Juan

Valencia

$577.1 M

$348.7 M

$343.5 M

$181.3 M

$51.7 M

$16.2 M

$5.0 M

$3.8 M

$3.8 M

$3.5 M

McKinley Sandoval

Socorro

Otero

Doña Ana

Santa Fe

Los Alamos

Bernalillo

Curry

Mora

Curry

Valencia

Sandoval Santa Fe

Bernalillo

Socorro

Otero

Doña Ana

San Juan

Chaves
82 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Pfizer, Inc. $16.7 B

Lockheed Martin $2.3 B

L3Harris Technologies $1.7 B

BAE Systems $177.0 M

SRC $150.0 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $141.2 M

St. Vincent's Catholic Medical Centers of NY $117.9 M

Saab AB $111.4 M

WPP, PLC $108.9 M

Jamaica Bearings $106.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

NEW YORK

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.9 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

57,965

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Jefferson 14,702 2,161 83 219 17,165

Orange 1,666 2,464 1,652 873 6,655

Onondaga 193 479 1,557 649 2,878

Oneida 69 1,799 679 261 2,808

Niagara 21 537 763 1,424 2,745

Queens 52 101 486 1,882 2,521

Albany 175 1,368 875 32 2,450

Schenectady 19 284 1,514 524 2,341

Suffolk 39 284 1,561 440 2,324

Kings 216 349 629 1,103 2,297

Construction: 1% 

Research and Development: 3%

Service: 5%

Supplies and Equipment: 91%

Active Duty: 32%

Civilian: 20%

National 

Guard: 28%

Reserve: 20%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

78%

13%

4%

6%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

71%

8%

16%

5%

$5.2 $5.1 $5.5 $6.0 $4.5

$8.0

$26.3

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#5 #32 5.0% $1,430 #4 #3 #15 #17

$28.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.4% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$24.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

57,965 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$711.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$24.5
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 83

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEW YORK

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

New York

Monroe

Tioga

Onondaga

Suffolk

Oneida

Nassau

Orange

Erie

Jefferson

(M = millions)

$17.2 B

$1.8 B

$1.4 B

$1.1 B

$610.3 M

$539.4 M

$456.6 M

$323.0 M

$213.9 M

$161.6 M

Jefferson

Orange

Oneida

Albany

Onondaga

New York

Niagara

Suffolk

Schenectady

Nassau

$975.0 M

$430.3 M

$174.8 M

$167.1 M

$128.7 M

$106.4 M

$104.6 M

$98.5 M

$98.1 M

$91.5 M

Monroe

Erie

Oneida 

Onondaga

Orange

New York

Tioga

Nassau

Suffolk

Jefferson

Jefferson

Schenectady

Onondaga

Oneida

Niagara

Albany

Orange

Nassau

New York

Suffolk
84 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

GlaxoSmithKline $1.6 B

Booz Allen Hamilton $205.6 M

CACI $177.6 M

Walsh Group $157.7 M

Environmental Chemical Corp. $145.4 M

Premix, Inc. $79.9 M

Sauer Holdings, Inc. $76.0 M

General Dynamics $75.6 M

US Foods Holding $73.3 M

Conti Federal Services, LLC $69.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

NORTH CAROLINA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$7.6 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

137,146

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Cumberland 46,607 10,220 628 2,153 59,608

Onslow 35,006 3,876 142 365 39,389

Craven 5,078 4,900 150 20 10,148

Wayne 4,162 777 208 1,441 6,588

Wake 470 760 1,272 2,314 4,816

Mecklenburg 228 449 1,522 945 3,144

Guilford 51 128 491 1,010 1,680

New Hanover 14 317 170 215 716

Rowan ND 70 183 288 ND

Caldwell 333 29 150 0 512

Construction: 9% Research and

Development: 3%

Service: 42%

Supplies and

Equipment: 46%

Active Duty: 69%

Civilian: 16%

National Guard: 8%

Reserve: 7%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

53%

23%

4%

19%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

50%

38%

7%

4%

$2.6 $2.5 $2.8

$3.9

$4.6

$6.1

$3.9

$5.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#14 #25 2.4% $1,255 #21 #11 #4 #6

$13.4 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.8% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$5.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

137,146 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$7.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$248.4 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 85

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Gaston

NORTH CAROLINA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Durham

Cumberland

Onslow

Craven

Wake

Guilford

Mecklenburg

Brunswick

Wayne

Gaston

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.7 B

$1.4 B

$978.0 M

$411.8 M

$183.8 M

$140.3 M

$90.4 M

$83.6 M

$81.4 M

$80.6 M

Cumberland

Onslow

Craven

Wayne

Wake

Mecklenburg

Guilford

New Hanover

Durham

Brunswick

$4.2 B

$1.6 B

$592.7 M

$345.4 M

$181.5 M

$118.0 M

$45.3 M

$39.8 M

$25.4 M

$21.0 M

Guilford

Durham

Wake

Guilford

Durham

Wake

Wayne

Wayne

Mecklenburg

Mecklenburg

Cumberland

Cumberland

Brunswick

Craven

Onslow

New Hanover 

Craven

Onslow

Brunswick
86 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Ideal Aerosmith, Inc. $16.7 M

Base Utilities, Inc. $11.9 M

Summit Technical Solutions $9.1 M

RFS, LLC $8.4 M

Dakco Distributors $8.0 M

Johnson Controls $7.5 M

Razor Consulting Solutions, Inc. $7.5 M

Gast Construction Co., Inc. $7.3 M

Custom Mechanical Systems Corp. $6.9 M

Pro-Mark Services $5.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

NORTH DAKOTA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$693.2 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

13,490

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Ward 5,499 695 351 29 6,574

Grand Forks 1,678 367 327 44 2,416

Cass 28 314 1,568 171 2,081

Burleigh ND 271 962 55 ND

Ramsey 0 61 341 0 402

Richland ND 0 156 33 ND

Stutsman 0 ND 120 0 ND

Barnes 0 20 80 0 100

Stark 0 ND 77 0 ND

LaMoure 0 ND 64 0 ND

Construction: 15%

Research and

Development: 11%

Service: 57%

Supplies and

Equipment: 17%

Active Duty: 54%

Civilian: 13%

National 

Guard: 31%

Reserve: 2%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

9%

12%

65%

14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

28%

1%

71%

1%

$0.1

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2

$0.3

$0.2 $0.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#45 #36 0.2% $1,182 #49 #47 #39 #39

$0.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.3% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

13,490 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$41.0 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 87

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

NORTH DAKOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Ward

Grand Forks

Cass

Pembina

Mountrail

Burleigh

LaMoure

Ramsey

Stutsman

Dickey

(M = millions)

$87.5 M

$53.9 M

$15.7 M

$15.4 M

$4.8 M

$4.5 M

$2.8 M

$762.8 K

$425.9 K

$388.0 K

Ward

Grand Forks

Cass

Burleigh

Ramsey

Mclean

Barnes

Richland

Stutsman

LaMoure

$389.6 M

$140.7 M

$74.0 M

$55.3 M

$14.3 M

$4.9 M

$3.0 M

$3.0 M

$2.4 M

$1.6 M

Mountrail Ward

Ward

Pembina

Ramsey

Ramsey

Grand Forks

Grand Forks

Burleigh Stutsman Barnes Cass

McLean

Burleigh Stutsman Cass

LaMoure

Dickey

LaMoure

Richland
88 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

General Electric $752.0 M

CFM International $331.7 M

Riverside Research Institute $211.9 M

W.A. Baxter & Sons, Ltd. $175.0 M

University of Dayton $157.4 M

Battelle Memorial Institute $144.9 M

Boeing $118.8 M

Frontier Technology, Inc. $116.5 M

Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company, LLC $93.1 M

Husky Marketing and Supply Co. $92.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

OHIO

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.6 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

59,470

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Greene 5,170 14,785 ND 2,391 ND

Franklin 344 6,195 3,786 2,708 13,033

Cuyahoga 225 1,997 386 176 2,784

Clark ND 298 1,641 ND ND

Hamilton 117 259 637 838 1,851

Trumbull 18 60 366 1,402 1,846

Summit 13 279 406 910 1,608

Richland ND 248 1,308 ND ND

Stark 24 47 680 781 1,532

Fulton ND 0 997 0 ND

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 21%

Service: 27%

Supplies and

Equipment: 51%

Active Duty: 11%

Civilian: 46%

National 

Guard: 26%

Reserve: 17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

9%

8%

56%

27%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

31%

4%

49%

16%

$3.5 $3.7 $4.4

$5.2 $5.5

$6.8

$5.2 $5.1

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#20 #39 1.6% $759 #23 #16 #12 #11

$8.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.1% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$5.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

59,470 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$201.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 89

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Hancock

Warren

FISCAL YEAR 2018 OHIO

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Greene

Hamilton

Montgomery

Franklin

Butler

Licking

Cuyahoga

Hancock

Miami

Warren

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.5 B

$1.1 B

$787.9 M

$467.6 M

$376.1 M

$202.8 M

$160.3 M

$93.2 M

$90.4 M

$56.7 M

Greene

Franklin

Cuyahoga

Hamilton

Clark

Summit

Trumbull

Montgomery

Richland

Licking

$2.0 B

$706.6 M

$168.6 M

$67.9 M

$66.0 M

$53.4 M

$50.5 M

$48.9 M

$46.3 M

$39.1 M

Cuyahoga

Cuyahoga

Miami Licking Franklin

Licking Franklin

Clark

Trumbull

Summit

Greene

Greene

Montgomery

Montgomery

Butler

Hamilton

Hamilton

Richland
90 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Boeing $1.6 B

V2X $147.4 M

Arctic Slope Regional Corp. $101.0 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $88.7 M

Harper Construction Company $63.4 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $52.5 M

Cymstar $48.6 M

L3Harris Technologies $47.4 M

Professional Contract Services $42.8 M

Strategic Mission Systems $42.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

OKLAHOMA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

59,376

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Oklahoma 6,379 18,179 2,180 2,072 28,810

Comanche 11,982 2,560 414 386 15,342

Tulsa 42 888 1,755 302 2,987

Jackson 1,286 1,239 81 88 2,694

Garfield 1,258 303 166 114 1,841

Pittsburg ND 1,694 68 11 ND

Cleveland 48 174 958 74 1,254

Canadian ND 25 658 365 ND

Wagoner 13 22 438 330 803

Muskogee ND 84 466 41 ND

Construction: 3% Research and

Development: 2%

Service: 69%

Supplies and

Equipment: 26%

Active Duty: 36%

Civilian: 43%

National 

Guard: 15%

Reserve: 7%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

10%

7%

74%

8%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

42%

5%

49%

5%

$2.0

$3.0 $2.8 $3.1 $3.2 $3.2

$2.7

$3.5

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#25 #13 1.2% $1,730 #26 #40 #13 #13

$7.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.9% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$3.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

59,376 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$66.3 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 91

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Adair

OKLAHOMA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Oklahoma

Comanche

Tulsa

Garfield

Jackson

Rogers

Cleveland

Pittsburg

Payne

Adair

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.5 B

$309.8 M

$307.3 M

$191.3 M

$61.1 M

$35.3 M

$28.5 M

$27.4 M

$26.0 M

$16.6 M

Oklahoma

Comanche

Jackson

Garfield

Pittsburg

Tulsa

Cleveland

Canadian

Wagoner

Muskogee

$2.0 B

$739.4 M

$169.8 M

$117.4 M

$116.8 M

$111.9 M

$35.3 M

$19.5 M

$16.0 M

$12.9 M

Garfield

Payne

Oklahoma

Tulsa Rogers

Cleveland

Comanche

Jackson

Pittsburg

Garfield

Oklahoma

Cleveland

Canadian

Tulsa

Wagoner

Muskogee

Comanche

Jackson

Pittsburg
92 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

StandardAero Aviation Holdings, Inc. $105.3 M

TAT Technologies, Ltd. $58.6 M

Columbia Helicopters, Inc. $40.8 M

Saltchuk Resources, Inc. $35.3 M

Galois $27.0 M

Allied Systems Co. $22.9 M

OFD Foods, LLC $20.9 M

Teledyne Technologies $20.9 M

Tactical Air Support, Inc. $18.7 M

A-dec, Inc. $14.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

OREGON

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$556.9 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,126

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Multnomah 274 1,372 1,750 666 4,062

Marion 16 336 1,256 ND ND

Klamath 101 243 867 0 1,211

Clackamas ND 184 617 367 ND

Lane 31 139 368 277 815

Umatilla 0 154 343 0 497

Jackson ND 35 332 0 ND

Clatsop ND 58 289 0 ND

Deschutes ND 40 274 0 ND

Washington 11 25 225 ND ND

Construction: 2%

Research and

Development: 8%

Supplies and Service: 31%

Equipment: 59%

Active Duty: 5%

Civilian: 24%

National Guard: 61%

Reserve: 11%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

19%

23%

13%

45%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

67%

9%

23%

0%

$0.7

$0.6

$0.5

$0.7

$0.8 $0.8

$0.5 $0.5

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#42 #51 0.2% $277 #43 #29 #43 #42

$1.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.4% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,126 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$89.3 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 93

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Clackamas

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Deschutes

Klamath

FISCAL YEAR 2018 OREGON

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Multnomah

Marion

Clackamas

Washington

Klamath

Linn

Yamhill

Umatilla

Deschutes

Benton

(M = millions)

$158.7 M

$154.6 M

$51.2 M

$48.6 M

$29.5 M

$21.1 M

$16.5 M

$12.8 M

$6.2 M

$6.1 M

Multnomah

Marion

Klamath

Clackamas

Lane

Umatilla

Wasco

Deschutes

Sherman

Clatsop

$228.2 M

$74.2 M

$60.9 M

$36.4 M

$27.8 M

$23.2 M

$13.2 M

$12.4 M

$12.2 M

$11.0 M

Washington Umatilla

Yamhill

Multnomah

Marion

Clackamas

Benton Linn

Multnomah

Marion

Clatsop

Umatilla

Sherman

Wasco

Deschutes

Klamath

Lane
94 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Bechtel Group $2.1 B

AmerisourceBergen $2.0 B

Fluor Corp. $1.7 B

BAE Systems $1.1 B

Boeing $781.5 M

Siemens AG $651.3 M

Highmark, Inc. $504.9 M

OraSure Technologies, Inc. $400.5 M

Lockheed Martin $361.6 M

Pennsylvania State University $251.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

PENNSYLVANIA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.1 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

54,181

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Philadelphia 337 8,240 1,379 63 10,019

Allegheny 329 1,500 1,336 2,661 5,826

Cumberland 616 4,188 202 444 5,450

Lebanon ND 886 3,651 139 ND

York 233 3,006 69 382 3,690

Monroe 14 2,762 35 200 3,011

Montgomery 22 319 1,681 582 2,604

Franklin ND 1,955 147 370 ND

Dauphin 81 236 1,798 171 2,286

Butler 14 724 190 321 1,249

Construction: 0%

Research and 

Development: 8%

Service: 19%

Supplies and Equipment: 72%

Active Duty: 4%

Civilian: 47% National 

Guard: 32%

Reserve: 18%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

17%

43%

5%

36%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

54%

19%

12%

15%

$9.3

$7.7

$9.6

$12.0

$13.4 $12.6

$14.3

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#8 #23 3.2% $1,382 #8 #5 #17 #15

$17.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.9% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$14.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

54,181 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$495.2 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$12.5
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 95

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Northampton

PENNSYLVANIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Allegheny

Montgomery

York

Franklin

Delaware

Philadelphia

Bucks

Dauphin

Northampton

Cumberland

(M = millions)

$4.2 B

$2.4 B

$1.2 B

$1.1 B

$908.8 M

$726.7 M

$537.3 M

$524.4 M

$429.2 M

$406.4 M

Philadelphia

Cumberland

York

Allegheny

Monroe

Lebanon

Franklin

Montgomery

Dauphin

Butler

$884.1 M

$452.6 M

$294.2 M

$272.2 M

$210.0 M

$200.0 M

$167.8 M

$95.5 M

$76.7 M

$76.7 M

Allegheny

Allegheny

Butler

Franklin

Dauphin

Cumberland

York

Franklin

Dauphin

Cumberland

York

Montgomery

Delaware

Philadelphia

Bucks

Lebanon

Montgomery

Philadelphia

Monroe
96 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Raytheon Technologies $88.0 M

SEACORP $69.3 M

Rite-Solutions $43.5 M

McLaughlin Research Corp. $37.9 M

Northrop Grumman $29.2 M

Mikel, Inc. $24.1 M

Leidos $18.3 M

SAIC $16.0 M

Network and Simulation Technologies $15.3 M

PURVIS Systems, Inc. $11.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

RHODE ISLAND

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$916.0 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,992

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Newport 2,642 4,756 131 918 8,447

Kent 48 61 1,402 ND ND

Washington ND 288 1,173 50 ND

Providence 91 209 389 243 932

Bristol ND ND 0 0 ND

Construction: 5% Research and

Development: 22%

Service: 49%

Supplies and

Equipment: 23%

Active Duty: 26%

Civilian: 41%

National 

Guard: 24%

Reserve: 9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

3%

90%

1%

6%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

66%

10%

2%

$0.5

$0.6

$0.5 $0.5

$0.6

$0.7 $0.7 $0.7

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#40 #17 0.3% $1,497 #40 #43 #40 #35

$1.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.3% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,992 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$62.1 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 97

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

RHODE ISLAND FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Newport

Providence

Washington

Kent

Bristol

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$586.7 M

$37.4 M

$15.1 M

$14.9 M

$5.5 M

Newport

Washington

Kent

Providence

Bristol

$753.0 M

$54.6 M

$51.5 M

$40.9 M

$431.3 K

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Newport

Washington

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Newport

Washington
98 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Scientific Research Corp. $139.2 M

Unaka Corp. $137.1 M

Detyens Shipyards $131.3 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $119.8 M

KBR $107.1 M

SAIC $98.5 M

Lockheed Martin $89.4 M

Atlas Technologies, Inc. $71.0 M

Chas Kurz & Co. $55.6 M

US Foods Holding $48.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

SOUTH CAROLINA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.0 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

65,493

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Richland 9,597 3,360 3,518 2,026 18,501

Charleston 3,851 4,818 878 2,969 12,516

Beaufort 9,943 1,198 122 42 11,305

Berkeley 6,829 300 150 ND ND

Sumter 5,705 829 131 164 6,829

Greenville 54 244 542 805 1,645

Spartanburg 22 11 232 168 433

York ND 20 231 159 ND

Anderson ND ND 388 0 ND

Orangeburg ND 21 127 222 ND

Construction: 7% Research and

Development: 2%

Service: 67%

Supplies and

Equipment: 24%

Active Duty: 57% Civilian: 17%

National 

Guard: 16%

Reserve: 10%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

18%

50%

19%

14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

40%

36%

22%

2%

$2.2 $2.5 $2.4

$2.9 $2.9 $2.8 $2.9 $3.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#26 #21 1.1% $1,186 #28 #27 #10 #16

$6.3 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.1% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$3.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

65,493 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.0 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$93.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 99

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

SOUTH CAROLINA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Charleston

Berkeley

Sumter

Richland

Greenville

Beaufort

Marion

Lexington

Dorchester

Spartanburg

(M = millions)

$1.3 B

$417.1 M

$368.3 M

$292.8 M

$198.3 M

$182.9 M

$137.1 M

$74.8 M

$44.2 M

$31.1 M

Charleston

Richland

Sumter

Berkeley

Beaufort

Greenville

Anderson

York

Florence

Spartanburg

$827.9 M

$742.8 M

$464.8 M

$430.0 M

$325.6 M

$49.4 M

$19.7 M

$12.5 M

$11.5 M

$10.9 M

Greenville

Spartanburg

Richland

Sumter Lexington

Marion

Berkeley

Dorchester

Charleston

Beaufort

Richland

Sumter

Florence

Berkeley

Charleston

Beaufort

Greenville

Spartanburg

Anderson

York
100 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Federal Contracting, Inc. $157.6 M

Voith Hydro, Inc. $146.8 M

Walsh Group $79.2 M

Sterling Computers $75.7 M

National Presto Industries $22.8 M

Roundhouse-MV JV $18.3 M

PCC Ventures $16.7 M

Peska Construction, Inc. $16.0 M

Rosenbauer Beteiligungsverwaltung $14.5 M

QSJV, LLC $8.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

SOUTH DAKOTA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$400.6 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

9,325

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Meade 3,308 11 112 22 3,453

Minnehaha 24 314 1,606 335 2,279

Pennington 13 855 794 ND ND

Brown ND ND 135 77 ND

Davison 0 47 158 0 205

Codington 0 ND 200 0 ND

Hughes 0 49 137 0 186

Charles Mix 0 41 100 0 141

Lake 0 0 127 0 127

Hutchinson 0 0 120 0 120

Construction: 45%

Service: 33%

Supplies and

Equipment: 21%

Active Duty: 36%

Civilian: 15%

National 

Guard: 44%

Reserve: 5%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

70%

5%

19%

5%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

43%

1%

56%

1%

$0.1

$0.2 $0.2

$0.3 $0.3 $0.3

$0.2

$0.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#44 #28 0.2% $1,169 #41 #51 #47 #46

$1.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.6% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

9,325 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$26.8 M GRANT 

SPENDING

Research and

Development: 0%
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 101

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Moody

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Meade

Lawrence

Pennington

Oglala Lakota Charles Mix

SOUTH DAKOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Meade

Charles Mix

Union

Minnehaha

Pennington

Deuel

Lawrence

Lincoln

Codington

Oglala Lakota

(M = millions)

$326.4 M

$147.7 M

$76.5 M

$33.8 M

$24.1 M

$22.8 M

$1.9 M

$412.1 K

$380.1 K

$297.8 K

Meade

Pennington

Minnehaha

Hughes

Davison

Charles Mix

Brown

Codington

Buffalo

Moody

$200.1 M

$83.0 M

$66.7 M

$7.6 M

$4.8 M

$4.7 M

$4.5 M

$3.9 M

$3.3 M

$2.7 M

Meade

Codington

Codington

Brown

Minnehaha

Lincoln

Union

Deuel

Pennington

Buffalo

Davison

Hughes

Charles Mix

Minnehaha
102 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Bechtel Group $299.5 M

FedEx $228.7 M

BAE Systems $153.2 M

Jacobs $147.1 M

Delek US Holdings, Inc. $143.5 M

Chemring Group $69.4 M

Integration Innovation, Inc. $51.5 M

ECI Defense Group $28.2 M

L3Harris Technologies $26.8 M

NANA Regional Corp. $21.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

TENNESSEE

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.1 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

26,134

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Shelby 1,465 2,462 1,319 1,225 6,471

Davidson 315 1,090 2,359 1,319 5,083

Blount 21 115 1,621 ND ND

Rutherford 43 128 861 445 1,477

Montgomery 62 1,350 54 ND ND

Hamilton 31 103 421 825 1,380

Knox 65 351 179 715 1,310

Coffee 49 474 237 11 771

Gibson 0 33 347 0 380

Washington 19 31 68 261 379

Construction: 7% Research and 

Development: 3%

Service: 62%

Supplies and

Equipment: 28%

Active Duty: 9%

Civilian: 25%

National Guard: 47%

Reserve: 20%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

22%

13%

36%

28%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

59%

19%

18%

5%

$1.5 $1.7 $1.5

$2.0

$3.9

$2.1 $1.9 $1.8

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#35 #48 0.6% $437 #33 #24 #28 #33

$3.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.6% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$1.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

26,134 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$114.1 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 103

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Hickman

FISCAL YEAR 2018 TENNESSEE

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Coffee

Shelby

Sullivan

Williamson

Montgomery

Hardeman

Davidson

Knox

Anderson

Hickman

(M = millions)

$576.5 M

$435.6 M

$170.8 M

$151.4 M

$69.7 M

$69.4 M

$55.8 M

$55.5 M

$45.8 M

$44.2 M

Shelby

Davidson

Montgomery

Blount

Coffee

Knox

Rutherford

Hamilton

Madison

Washington

$419.7 M

$229.1 M

$94.7 M

$59.2 M

$54.1 M

$44.5 M

$43.5 M

$36.0 M

$11.7 M

$11.4 M

Montgomery

Shelby Hardeman

Sullivan

Davidson Anderson

Knox

Coffee

Coffee

Rutherford

Montgomery

Davidson

Williamson

Madison

Washington

Blount

Shelby Hamilton

Knox
104 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $23.3 B

McKesson $2.9 B

L3Harris Technologies $2.1 B

Bell Boeing Joint Project Office $1.8 B

Valero Energy $1.4 B

KBR $1.3 B

Raytheon Technologies $809.0 M

Dell $762.4 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $738.3 M

Petromax Refining Co. $536.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

TEXAS

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$12.1 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

214,865

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Bexar 32,993 22,640 2,669 9,200 67,502

Bell 32,181 5,161 665 974 38,981

El Paso 24,653 3,748 1,118 1,980 31,499

Tarrant 1,150 2,580 1,499 6,278 11,507

Harris 691 740 3,172 4,038 8,641

Dallas 587 800 2,219 3,585 7,191

Wichita 4,955 1,063 138 114 6,270

Travis 504 979 2,741 1,245 5,469

Taylor 4,381 496 200 321 5,398

Nueces 1,268 3,624 0 478 5,370

Construction: 0%

Research and 

Development: 6%

Service: 26%

Supplies and Equipment: 68%

Active Duty: 52%

Civilian: 22%

National 

Guard: 10%

Reserve: 15%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

19%

40%

17%

24%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

57%

9%

28%

6%

$38.0 $38.0

$66.1

$32.6

$45.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#2 #15 10.4% $1,932 #1 #9 #3 #3

$58.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.5% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$45.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

214,865 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$12.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$340.6 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$23.0 $25.2 $22.5
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 105

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Bell

FISCAL YEAR 2018 TEXAS

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, (M=millions) (M=millions) B = billions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Tarrant

Dallas

Bexar

Harris

Potter

Hunt

Collin

Williamson

Bell

El Paso

(M = millions, B = billions)

$18.6 B

$9.8 B

$5.5 B

$3.4 B

$1.8 B

$1.4 B

$801.7 M

$782.3 M

$650.2 M

$562.6 M

Bexar

Bell

El Paso

Tarrant

Nueces

Taylor

Travis

Harris

Wichita

Dallas

$4.3 B

$2.4 B

$1.9 B

$525.8 M

$387.4 M

$310.0 M

$293.8 M

$292.6 M

$266.8 M

$265.3 M

ůWĂƐŽ

ůWĂƐŽ

WŽƚƚĞƌ

ŽůůŝŶ

,ƵŶƚ

ĂůůĂƐ dĂƌƌĂŶƚ

ĂůůĂƐ dĂƌƌĂŶƚ

tŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶ

ĞdžĂƌ

Ğůů

dƌĂǀŝƐ

ĞdžĂƌ

,ĂƌƌŝƐ

tŝĐŚŝƚĂ

dĂLJůŽƌ

,ĂƌƌŝƐ

EƵĞĐĞƐ
106 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Northrop Grumman $2.2 B

L3Harris Technologies $224.5 M

Advantaged Solutions $156.2 M

Utah State University $142.4 M

Boeing $108.3 M

NH1 JV $91.5 M

Sinclair Oil Corp. $69.1 M

Triumph Group, Inc. $47.1 M

M. A. Mortenson Companies, Inc. $37.5 M

Kekolu-Rio Vista JV, LLC $28.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

UTAH

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.9 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

31,843

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Davis 4,133 13,356 ND 1,287 ND

Salt Lake 224 1,194 4,628 2,392 8,438

Tooele 24 1,143 146 0 1,313

Utah 39 45 965 146 1,195

Weber 27 133 281 416 857

Washington 15 18 300 51 384

Cache 14 ND 87 74 ND

Box Elder ND 47 97 0 ND

Sanpete 0 ND 126 0 ND

Iron ND ND 97 0 ND

Construction: 3%

Research and

Development: 54%

Service: 31%

Supplies and

Equipment: 12%

Active Duty: 14%

Civilian: 50%

National 

Guard: 22%

Reserve: 14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

11%

3%

77%

9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

33%

2%

61%

4%

$1.1 $1.0 $1.3 $1.5 $1.8 $1.8

$2.9

$4.1

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#27 #16 1.1% $1,801 #24 #30 #25 #24

$6.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.5% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$4.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

31,843 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$85.0 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 107

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 UTAH

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, (M=millions) (M=millions) B = billions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Weber

Davis

Salt Lake

Cache

Tooele

Utah

Summit

Box Elder

Iron

Washington

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.1 B

$1.1 B

$425.1 M

$156.3 M

$113.8 M

$63.6 M

$52.1 M

$23.9 M

$7.7 M

$3.2 M

Davis

Salt Lake

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Washington

Box Elder

Cache

Iron

Sanpete

$1.4 B

$334.4 M

$93.3 M

$37.4 M

$26.4 M

$8.7 M

$5.9 M

$5.7 M

$2.6 M

$2.3 M

Cache

Box Elder Weber

Summit Davis

Tooele

Utah

Salt Lake

Iron

Washington

Davis

Salt Lake

Cache

Box Elder

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Iron

Washington

Sanpete
108 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

General Dynamics $185.2 M

Raytheon Technologies $49.6 M

Marvell Technology, Inc. $47.8 M

IBM $8.4 M

Omni Medical Systems $6.8 M

Omni Measurement Systems $4.6 M

University of Vermont & State Agricultural College $4.4 M

Norwich University $3.4 M

Galvion $2.8 M

Mobile Virtual Player, LLC $2.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

VERMONT

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$170.9 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

3,802

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Chittenden 69 494 2,195 ND ND

Washington 37 11 248 0 296

Rutland ND ND 80 78 ND

Windsor ND 17 62 75 ND

Franklin 0 ND 68 0 ND

Orange 0 0 72 0 72

Windham 0 ND 42 0 ND

Bennington 0 0 48 0 48

Orleans 0 0 46 0 46

Caledonia 0 ND 38 0 ND

Construction: 0% 

Research and Development: 3%

Service: 7%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 90%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

11%

59%

12%

18%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

64%

2%

33%

1%

$0.2

$0.3

$0.5 $0.5

$0.2

$0.4

$0.2

$0.3

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#51 #33 0.1% $853 #44 #49 #51 #51

$0.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.4% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

3,802 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$38.2 M GRANT 

SPENDING

Active Duty: 3%

Civilian: 15%

National Guard: 78%

Reserve: 4%
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 109

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Washington

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 VERMONT

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Chittenden

Addison

Washington

Orange

Windsor

Rutland

Orleans

Windham

Caledonia

Bennington

(M = millions)

$276.7 M

$50.5 M

$5.9 M

$3.1 M

$2.6 M

$1.5 M

$1.1 M

$740.6 K

$623.5 K

$77.1 K

Chittenden

Washington

Rutland

Windsor

Franklin

Orange

Orleans

Bennington

Caledonia

Windham

$130.2 M

$14.2 M

$5.6 M

$5.2 M

$3.3 M

$1.8 M

$1.8 M

$1.7 M

$1.6 M

$1.5 M

Orleans

Chittenden

Addison

Caledonia

Washington

Orange

Windsor

Rutland

Bennington

Franklin

Orleans

Chittenden

Windsor

Rutland

Caledonia

Bennington Windham

Windham

Orange
110 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Huntington Ingalls $3.2 B

Leidos $2.2 B

ADS Tactical, Inc. $1.4 B

CACI $1.4 B

General Dynamics $1.3 B

Booz Allen Hamilton $1.3 B

Northrop Grumman $1.2 B

SAIC $1.1 B

MITRE $643.6 M

BAE Systems $588.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

VIRGINIA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$20.3 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

247,314

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Norfolk City 49,691 16,903 316 1,215 68,125

Virginia Beach City 20,684 3,795 873 4,642 29,994

Fairfax 6,135 12,268 625 2,705 21,733

Arlington 2,518 16,044 81 116 18,759

Portsmouth City 4,037 13,018 106 17 17,178

Prince William 7,841 4,347 295 760 13,243

Newport News City 6,209 3,662 77 1,029 10,977

Prince George 6,744 3,599 0 468 10,811

York 7,957 670 1,005 915 10,547

Accomack 6,593 103 161 782 7,639

Construction: 2% Research and

Development: 9%

Service: 63%

Supplies and

Equipment: 26%

Active Duty: 50%

Civilian: 40%

National Guard: 4%

Reserve: 6%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

20%

35%

15%

30%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

21%

59%

9%

11%

$36.3

$42.0

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#1 #1 11.2% $7,223 #2 #8 #2 #1

$62.7 B SPENT 

IN STATE

9.7% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$42.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

247,314 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$20.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$394.1 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$25.3 $26.4

$32.2 $34.1

$39.8 $38.5
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 111

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 VIRGINIA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, (M=millions) (M=millions) B = billions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Fairfax

Arlington

Newport News City

Norfolk City

Virginia Beach City

Prince William

Alexandria City

Loudoun

Portsmouth City

Hampton City

(M = millions, B = billions)

$17.8 B

$4.4 B

$3.6 B

$3.2 B

$2.2 B

$2.1 B

$1.7 B

$1.2 B

$968.0 M

$819.8 M

Norfolk City

Fairfax

Newport News City

King George

York

$5.1 B

$2.3 B

Arlington

$2.3 B

Virginia Beach City

$2.1 B

Portsmouth City

$1.4 B

Accomack

$1.0 B

Prince William

$894.7 M

$792.2 M

$694.2 M

$689.1 M

Loudoun

Fairfax

Arlington

Alexandria City

Prince William

Newport News City Norfolk City

Virginia Beach City

Portsmouth City

Hampton City

Fairfax

Arlington

Prince William

King George

Accomack

York

Norfolk City

Virginia Beach City

Newport News City

Portsmouth City
112 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Boeing $4.1 B

PacMed $177.5 M

TAT Technologies, Ltd. $152.7 M

Par Pacific Holdings $111.0 M

Microsoft $98.1 M

PacWest-Korte JV $86.7 M

Skookum Educational Programs $85.4 M

InBios International, Inc. $61.1 M

SAFE Boats International, LLC $49.5 M

University of Washington $43.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

WASHINGTON

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$7.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

108,542

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Pierce 30,108 6,860 3,016 5,008 44,992

Kitsap 4,705 19,011 115 800 24,631

Island 7,228 818 0 703 8,749

Spokane 3,581 923 1,514 541 6,559

Snohomish 698 671 338 1,151 2,858

King 407 843 1,117 108 2,475

Walla Walla ND 1,094 27 0 ND

Yakima 90 273 493 192 1,048

Clark 23 82 101 426 632

Grays Harbor ND 24 260 0 ND

Construction: 3%

Research and

Development: 4%

Service: 27%

Supplies and

Equipment: 67%

Active Duty: 56%

Civilian: 29%

National 

Guard: 7%

Reserve: 8%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

10%

25%

56%

9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

40%

45%

11%

4%

$0.8

$9.5

$8.3

$9.5

$10.8

$7.0

$10.1

$6.9

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#11 #22 2.6% $1,874 #19 #10 #7 #7

$14.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.0% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$6.9 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

108,542 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$7.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$319.4 M GRANT 

SPENDING

FY15
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 113

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

WASHINGTON FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

King

Kitsap

Pierce

Snohomish

Island

Spokane

Klickitat

Cowlitz

Clark

Skagit

(M = millions, B = billions)

$4.9 B

$635.3 M

$593.7 M

$180.9 M

$164.5 M

$109.7 M

$74.9 M

$41.8 M

$41.3 M

$34.1 M

Pierce

Kitsap

Island

Spokane

Snohomish

King

Walla Walla

Yakima

Clark

Thurston

$3.0 B

$2.1 B

$600.1 M

$360.8 M

$162.1 M

$156.2 M

$47.2 M

$39.3 M

$21.6 M

$12.0 M

Skagit

Snohomish

King

Pierce

Kitsap

Island

Spokane

Cowlitz

Clark

Klickitat

Island

Thurston

Snohomish

Pierce

Kitsap King

Clark

Spokane

Yakima

Walla Walla
114 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Northrop Grumman $35.8 M

AMS Group $14.3 M

NextGen Federal Systems $13.9 M

Civil-Military Innovation Institute, Inc. $13.2 M

HDD JV $10.4 M

Touchstone Research Laboratory, Ltd. $6.5 M

MCW-TMG1, LLC $5.7 M

4D Tech Solutions, Inc. $3.9 M

Loar Group, Inc. $3.5 M

Marshall University Research Corp. $3.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

WEST VIRGINIA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$364.6 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

9,627

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Kanawha 28 399 1,454 346 2,227

Berkeley ND 222 1,302 38 ND

Preston 0 63 501 64 628

Cabell ND 597 0 ND ND

Putnam 0 110 388 56 554

Wood ND 59 320 67 ND

Fayette ND 13 408 ND ND

Mercer ND ND 104 262 ND

Wayne 0 39 243 59 341

Ohio ND 76 111 109 ND

Construction: 13%

Research and

Development: 21% Service: 25%

Supplies and

Equipment: 41%

Active Duty: 1%

Civilian: 20%

National Guard: 63%

Reserve: 16%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

53%

7%

18%

21%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

73%

2%

25%

1%

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2

$0.1

$0.4

$0.5

$0.1

$0.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#50 #49 0.1% $338 #51 #38 #46 #48

$0.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.6% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

9,627 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$69.0 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 115

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Ohio

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Ohio

Preston

Marion

WEST VIRGINIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Mineral

Monongalia

Berkeley

Jefferson

Kanawha

Ohio

Cabell

Preston

Marion

Mason

(M = millions)

$38.8 M

$33.2 M

$20.7 M

$15.7 M

$11.3 M

$8.3 M

$5.3 M

$4.6 M

$4.3 M

$3.5 M

Kanawha

Berkeley

Cabell

Preston

Putnam

Wood

Wayne

Harrison

Ohio

Fayette

$103.2 M

$57.3 M

$49.6 M

$24.6 M

$17.8 M

$15.0 M

$10.1 M

$9.8 M

$9.2 M

$9.2 M

Mason

Kanawha

Cabell

Monongalia

Mineral Berkeley

Jefferson

Wood

Putnam

Wayne Fayette

Cabell

Kanawha

Preston

Berkeley

Harrison
116 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Oshkosh Corp. $934.6 M

Fincantieri Group $636.5 M

APTIM $101.0 M

Arcline Investment Management, LP $71.0 M

National Presto Industries $70.4 M

Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance $67.2 M

General Electric $46.8 M

Konecranes, Inc. $44.5 M

Complete Mobile Dentistry, Inc. $39.7 M

Quanta Services, Inc. $35.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

WISCONSIN

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$586.6 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

16,599

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Dane 106 589 2,241 699 3,635

Milwaukee 213 363 1,211 999 2,786

Monroe 229 1,084 197 706 2,216

Juneau 0 146 724 0 870

Brown 21 33 136 576 766

Waukesha 11 26 296 127 460

Winnebago ND 45 150 231 ND

Marathon ND 20 151 178 ND

Fond du Lac ND ND 215 89 ND

La Crosse 11 12 129 103 255

Construction: 3% 

Research and 

Development: 1%

Service: 15%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 81%

Active Duty: 4%

Civilian: 17%

National Guard: 54%

Reserve: 26%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

26%

53%

4%

17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

77%

6%

16%

1%

$2.0 $2.4 $2.4 $2.6

$3.7 $3.9

$3.2

$2.7

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#33 #44 0.6% $581 #30 #25 #36 #41

$3.4 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.9% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$2.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

16,599 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$112.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 117

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Sauk

WISCONSIN FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Winnebago

Marinette

Dane

Monroe

Milwaukee

Waukesha

Rock

Outagamie

Kenosha

Sauk

(M = millions)

$941.7 M

$641.3 M

$236.8 M

$201.7 M

$194.0 M

$149.7 M

$142.6 M

$37.9 M

$31.9 M

$27.3 M

Dane

Monroe

Milwaukee

Juneau

Brown

Waukesha

Winnebago

Marinette

Buffalo

Marathon

$153.9 M

$126.7 M

$100.0 M

$32.4 M

$15.3 M

$11.0 M

$10.7 M

$8.7 M

$8.6 M

$7.9 M

Marinette

Outagamie

Winnebago

Monroe

Dane

Rock

Kenosha

Waukesha

Milwaukee

Juneau

Marathon

Monroe

Buffalo

Dane

Waukesha

Milwaukee

Brown

Winnebago

Marinette
118 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Conti Federal Services, LLC $124.7 M

Morgan Engineering Systems, Inc. $13.4 M

Broncho Co. $8.1 M

M1 Support Services $6.0 M

Razor Consulting Solutions, Inc. $5.8 M

Native American Services Corp. $5.3 M

Kennon Products $5.0 M

HME, Inc. $4.8 M

Cora Jane Contractors, LLC $4.5 M

High West Energy, Inc. $3.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

WYOMING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$348.9 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

7,171

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Laramie 3,056 970 1,769 121 5,916

Platte 58 72 193 0 323

Natrona ND ND 76 57 ND

Albany 14 ND 99 0 ND

Uinta 0 ND 87 0 ND

Fremont 0 ND 79 0 ND

Campbell ND 0 75 0 ND

Sheridan 0 ND 58 14 ND

Goshen 0 0 72 0 72

Converse 0 0 56 0 56

Research and Construction: 73%

Development: 2%

Service: 20%

Active Duty: 44%

Civilian: 15%

National 

Guard: 38%

Reserve: 3%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

72%

0%

24%

3%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

26%

1%

72%

1%

$0.1 $0.1 $0.1 $0.1

$0.2

$0.1 $0.1

$0.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#49 #34 0.1% $1,059 #46 #50 #49 #49

$0.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.3% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

7,171 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$33.4 M GRANT 

SPENDING

Supplies and Equipment: 4%
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 WYOMING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Laramie

Sheridan

Teton

Sublette

Park

Platte

Natrona

Albany

Fremont

Big Horn

(M = millions)

$218.1 M

$5.0 M

$3.7 M

$2.0 M

$1.4 M

$1.1 M

$767.7 K

$615.3 K

$511.8 K

$68.7 K

Laramie

Platte

Albany

Natrona

Sheridan

Uinta

Fremont

Campbell

Goshen

Park

$315.3 M

$12.4 M

$4.7 M

$3.8 M

$1.9 M

$1.6 M

$1.5 M

$1.4 M

$1.1 M

$1.0 M

119

Park

Teton

Fremont

Sublette

Sheridan

Natrona

Platte

Albany

Laramie

Big Horn

Uinta

Campbell

Sheridan

Fremont Natrona

Goshen

Platte

Albany

Laramie

Park
120 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

APPENDIX 1: MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

ALABAMA

AASF02 Birmingham Army Guard Jefferson

Anniston Army Depot Army Active Calhoun

Birmingham Airport AF Guard Jefferson

Fort McClellan ARNG Training Center Army Guard Calhoun

Fort Novosel (formerly Fort Rucker) Army Active Dale

Maxwell AFB AF Active Montgomery

Montgomery JFHQ AFRC / CSMS 01 Army Guard Montgomery

Montgomery Regional Airport ANGB AF Guard Montgomery

Redstone Arsenal Army Active Madison

RW Shepherd Hope Hull Army Guard Montgomery

ALASKA

Alcantra Armory Complex Army Guard Matanuska-Susitna

Clear Air Force Station AF Active Denali

Eareckson Air Force Station AF Active Aleutians West

Eielson Air Force Base AF Active Fairbanks North Star

Fort Greely Army Active Southeast Fairbanks

Fort Wainwright Army Active Fairbanks North Star

Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson AF Active Anchorage

King Salmon Air Force Station AF Active Bristol Bay

Southeast Alaska Acoustic Measurent Facility Navy Active Ketchikan Gateway

Yukon Weapons Range AF Active Fairbanks North Star

ARIZONA

Air Force Plant 44 AF Active Pima

Barry Goldwater Range MC Active Yuma

Buckeye TS Army Guard Maricopa

Camp Navajo Army Guard Coconino

Davis-Monthan Air Force Base AF Active Pima

Florence Military Reservation Army Guard Pinal

Fort Huachuca Army Active Cochise

Luke AFB AF Active Maricopa

Marine Corps Air Station Yuma MC Active Yuma

Naval Observatory Flagstaff Station Navy Active Coconino

Papago Military Reservation Army Guard Maricopa

Picacho Aviation TS Army Guard Pinal

Silver Bell Army Heliport Army Guard Pinal

Sky Harbor IAP AF Guard Maricopa

The Barry M Goldwater Air Force Range AF Active Maricopa

Tucson IAP AF Guard Pima

Yuma Proving Ground Army Active La Paz

ARKANSAS

Camp Joseph T Robinson Army Guard Faulkner

Fort Chaffee MTC Army Guard Sebastian

Fort Smith MAP AF Guard Sebastian

Joint

Site Service County Base Site

Joint

Service County Base

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

Little Rock AFB AF Active Pulaski

Pine Bluff Arsenal Army Active Jefferson

CALIFORNIA

Air Force Plant 42 AF Active Los Angeles

Amphib Base Coronado East Navy Active San Diego

Amphib Base Coronado West Navy Active San Diego

Balboa Hospital Navy Active San Diego

Beale Air Force Base AF Active Yuba

Broadway Complex Navy Active San Diego

Camp Michael Monsoor Navy Active San Diego

Channel Islands ANG Station AF Guard Ventura

Edwards Air Force Base AF Active Kern

Fort Hunter Liggett Army Reserve Monterey

Fort Irwin Army Active San Bernardino

Fresno Yosemite International ANG AF Guard Fresno

ITC Camp San Luis Obisbo Army Guard San Luis Obispo

Long Beach Fuel Complex Navy Active Los Angeles

Los Alamitos JFTB Army Guard Orange

Los Angeles Air Force Base AF Active Los Angeles

March ARB AF Reserve Riverside

Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center MC Active San Bernardino

Marine Corps Air Station Miramar MC Active San Diego

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Army Reserve San Diego

MCLB Barstow MC Active San Bernardino

MCRD San Diego MC Active San Diego

Military Ocean Terminal Concord Army Active Contra Costa

Mountain Warfare Training Center MC Active Mono

MTC-H Camp Roberts Army Guard San Luis Obispo

NAF El Centro Navy Active Imperial

NAS Lemoore CA Navy Active Kings

NAVBASE Coronado Navy Active San Diego

NAVBASE Point Loma Navy Active San Diego

NAVBASE San Diego Navy Active San Diego

NAVBASE Ventura County -Point Mugu Navy Active Ventura

NAVBASE Ventura County -Port Hueneme Navy Active Ventura

NAVPMOSSP Mtn View Navy Active Santa Clara

NAVSUPPACT Monterey CA Navy Active Monterey

NAVWPNSTA Seal Beach Navy Active Orange

Navy Annex Navy Active Monterey

NAWS China Lake Navy Active Inyo

NIWC Pacific Navy Active San Diego

Norwalk 2 AF Reserve Los Angeles

Old Town Site 1 Navy Active San Diego

Ozol Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Contra Costa

Parks Reserve Forces Tng Area Army Reserve Alameda

Presidio of Monterey Army Active Monterey

San Nicolas Island Navy Active Ventura

San Pedro Fuel Depot Navy Active Los Angeles

Santa Cruz Island Navy Active Santa Barbara

Sierra Army Depot Army Active Lassen

Travis Air Force Base AF Active Solano

Vandenberg Air Force Base AF Active Santa Barbara

Warner Springs Remote Training Site Navy Active San Diego

COLORADO

Buckley Air Force Base AF Active Arapahoe

Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station AF Active El Paso

Fort Carson Army Active El Paso

Peterson Air Force Base AF Active El Paso

Pueblo Chemical Depot Army Active Pueblo

Schriever Air Force Base AF Active El Paso

USAF Academy AF Active El Paso

CONNECTICUT

Bradley IAP AF Guard Hartford

Camp Hartell Army Guard Hartford

Camp Nett Army Guard New London

Naval Submarine Base New London Navy Active New London

Stones Ranch Military Res Army Guard New London

DELAWARE

Bethany Beach Training Site Army Guard Sussex

Dover AFB AF Active Kent

New Castle Airport AF Guard New Castle

River Road Training Site Army Guard New Castle

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling Navy Active District of Columbia

Naval Observatory Navy Active District of Columbia

Naval Research Laboratory Navy Active District of Columbia

Naval Support Activity Washington Navy Active District of Columbia

FLORIDA

Arbuckle Airfield AF Active Polk

Avon Park AF Range AF Active Polk

Cape Canaveral Air Force Station AF Active Brevard

Destin Moreno Point Army Active Okaloosa

Eglin Air Force Base AF Active Walton

FLC Fuel Depot Heckscher Navy Active Duval

Homestead ARB AF Reserve Miami-Dade

Hurlburt Field AF Active Okaloosa

Jacksonville FL Maint MC Reserve Duval

Jacksonville IAP AF Guard Duval

MacDill Air Force Base AF Active Hillsborough

MCSF Blount Island (FL) MC Active Duval

NAS Jacksonville FL Navy Active Duval

NAS Key West FL Navy Active Monroe

NAS Pensacola FL Navy Active Escambia

Naval Hospital Navy Active Monroe

Naval Support Activity Orlando Navy Active Orange

Naval Support Activity Panama City Navy Active Bay

NAVSTA Mayport FL Navy Active Duval

Patrick Air Force Base AF Active Brevard

Simulation and Training Technology Center Army Active Orange

Snake Creek TS Miramar Army Guard Broward

Tyndall Air Force Base AF Active Bay

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

Joint

Site Service County Base

Joint

Site Service County Base

121
122 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

Joint

Site Service County Base

Joint

Site Service County Base

GEORGIA

Air Force Plant 6 AF Active Cobb

Atlanta United Ave Army Guard Fulton

Camp Frank D Merrill Army Active Lumpkin

Cumming Army Guard Forsyth

Dobbins ARB AF Reserve Cobb

Fort Moore (formerly Fort Benning) Army Active Chattahoochee

Fort Eisenhower (formerly Fort Gordon) Army Active Richmond

Fort Stewart Army Active Liberty

General Lucius D Clay National Guard Center Army Guard Cobb

Hunter Army Airfield Army Active Chatham

Macon Readiness Center Army Guard Bibb

MCLB Albany MC Active Dougherty

Moody Air Force Base AF Active Lowndes

Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay Navy Active Camden

Oglethorpe Armory Army Guard Clayton

Robins AFB AF Active Houston

Savannah/Hilton Head IAP AF Guard Chatham

VTS Catoosa Army Guard Catoosa

HAWAII

Fort Shafter Army Active Honolulu

Ft Ruger Army Guard Honolulu

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam Navy Active Honolulu

Kalaeloa Army Guard Honolulu

Marine Corps Base Hawaii MC Active Honolulu

Optical and Supercomputing Observatory AF Active Maui

Pacific Missile Range Facility Navy Active Kauai

Pearl City Annex MC Active Honolulu

Tripler Army Medical Center Army Active Honolulu

Tropic Regions Test Center Army Active Honolulu

TS Keaukaha Mil Res Army Guard Hawaii

Wheeler Army Airfield Army Active Honolulu

IDAHO

Boise Air Terminal AF Guard Ada

Mountain Home Air Force Base AF Active Elmore

NSWCCD Acoustic Research Detachment Navy Active Kootenai

Orchard Combat Training Center Army Guard Ada

Saylor Creek Air Force Range AF Active Owyhee

ILLINOIS

Capital Airport AF Guard Sangamon

General Wayne A Downing Peoria IAP AF Guard Peoria

Joliet USARC/JTA Army Reserve Will

Marseilles (MTA Tng Area) Army Guard LaSalle

Naval Station Great Lakes IL Navy Active Lake

Rock Island Arsenal Army Active Rock Island

Scott AFB AF Active St. Clair

Sparta Armory Army Guard Randolph

Springfield (TS Cp Lincoln) Army Guard Sangamon

INDIANA

Camp Atterbury Army Guard Bartholomew

Grissom ARB AF Reserve Miami

Hulman Fld AF Guard Vigo

Indianapolis 38 ID Army Guard Marion

Knightstown Army Guard Rush

Muscatatuck Urban Training Center Army Guard Jennings

Naval Support Activity Crane Navy Active Martin

Shelbyville Army Guard Shelby

IOWA

Camp Dodge Johnston TS Army Guard Polk

Des Moines IAP AF Guard Polk

Iowa AAP Army Active Des Moines

Sioux Gateway Airport AF Guard Woodbury

KANSAS

Forbes Field ANG AF Guard Shawnee

Fort Leavenworth Army Active Leavenworth

Fort Riley Army Active Riley

JFHQ-Kansas Army Guard Shawnee

McConnell AFB AF Active Sedgwick

Salina KS Training Center Army Guard Saline

Smoky Hill ANG Range AF Guard Saline

KENTUCKY

Blue Grass Army Depot Army Active Madison

Fort Knox Army Active Hardin

Frankfort Boone NG Center Army Guard Franklin

Louisville IAP-Standiford FL Site 1 AF Guard Jefferson

WH Ford Regional Tng Ctr Army Guard Muhlenberg

LOUISIANA

AF Active Bossier

Army Guard East Baton Rouge

Army Guard Rapides

Army Guard Rapides

Army Guard Webster

Army Guard St. Tammany

Army Guard Iberville

Army Guard Rapides

Army Active Vernon

Army Guard Tangipahoa

Army Guard Orleans

Barksdale AFB

Baton Rouge AFRC

Beauregard Training Range

Camp Beauregard

Camp Minden Training Site

Camp Villere

Carville Gillis Long Center

Esler Field

Fort Johnson (formerly Fort Polk)

Hammond Airport

Jackson Barracks

NAS JRB New Orleans Navy Active Plaquemines

MAINE

Auburn Training Site Army Guard Androscoggin

Bangor IAP AF Guard Penobscot

Bangor Training Site Army Guard Penobscot

Bog Brook Training Site Army Guard Oxford

DFAS Annex AF Active Aroostook

Hollis Plains Training Site Army Guard York

Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Navy Active York
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

Joint

Site Service County Base

Joint

Site Service County Base

MARYLAND

Aberdeen Proving Ground Army Active Harford

Adelphi Laboratory Center Army Active Montgomery

Blossom Point Research Facility Army Active Charles

Chesapeake Bay Detach Navy Active Calvert

Fort Detrick Army Active Frederick

Fort Meade Army Active Anne Arundel

Havre De Grace Military Res Army Guard Harford

Joint Base Andrews AF Active Prince George's

Martin State Airport AF Guard Baltimore

MTA Camp Fretterd Army Guard Baltimore

MTA Gunpowder Military Reservation Army Guard Baltimore

Naval Air Station Patuxent River Navy Active St. Mary's

Naval Support Facility Carderock Navy Active Montgomery

Naval Support Facility Indian Head Navy Active Charles

NAVSUPPACT Annapolis Navy Active Anne Arundel

NAVSUPPACT Bethesda MD Navy Active Montgomery

NMIC Suitland Navy Active Prince George's

NRL Blossom Point Navy Active Charles

Upper Yard Annapolis Navy Active Anne Arundel

MASSACHUSETTS

Ayer Army Guard Middlesex

Barnes MAP (ANG) AF Guard Hampden

Cape Cod Air Force Station AF Active Barnstable

Devens Reserve Forces Tng Area Army Reserve Worcester

Hanscom Air Force Base AF Active Middlesex

MTA Camp Curtis Guil Army Guard Essex

MTA Camp Edwards Army Guard Barnstable

Otis ANG Base AF Guard Barnstable

U.S. Army Natick Soldier Systems Center Army Active Middlesex

Westover ARB AF Reserve Hampden

MICHIGAN

Alpena County Regional Airport AF Guard Alpena

CTC Fort Custer Trng Center Army Guard Kalamazoo

Detroit Arsenal Army Active Macomb

Grayling Airfield Army Guard Crawford

Lansing Joint Forces Readiness Center Army Guard Ingham

MTC-H Camp Grayling Army Guard Kalkaska

Selfridge ANGB AF Guard Macomb

W K Kellogg AF Guard Calhoun

MINNESOTA

Arden Hills Army Training Site Army Guard Ramsey

Camp Ripley Army Guard Morrison

Duluth IAP AF Guard St. Louis

Duluth NG Armory Army Guard St. Louis

Minn-St Paul AF Reserve Hennepin

Rochester NGA and OMS 2 Army Guard Olmsted

Rosemount NG Armory Army Guard Dakota

St Cloud AASF Army Guard Sherburne

St Cloud NG Armory Army Guard Stearns

MISSISSIPPI

Camp Shelby Army Guard Perry

CBC Gulfport MS Navy Active Harrison

Columbus AFB AF Active Lowndes

CTA Camp Mccain Army Guard Grenada

Gulfport AVCRAD Army Guard Harrison

Gulfport-Biloxi Regional Airport (ANG) AF Guard Harrison

Jackson IAP Thompson Field AF Guard Rankin

Keesler AFB AF Active Harrison

Naval Air Station Meridian Navy Active Lauderdale

NRL Stennis Space Center Navy Active Hancock

OLF Bravo Navy Active Kemper

Woolmarket (De Soto) Navy Active Harrison

MISSOURI

Fort Leonard Wood Army Active Pulaski

Lake City AAP Army Active Jackson

Macon TS Army Guard Macon

MTA Camp Clark Nevada Army Guard Vernon

MTA Camp Crowder Neosho Army Guard Newton

NGA Arnold Site AF Active Jefferson

Rosecrans MAP (139AG) AF Guard Buchanan

Springfield AVCRAD (New) Army Guard Greene

St Louis Air Force Station AF Active St. Louis City

TS Ike Skelton Jefferson City Army Guard Cole

TS Mark Twain Natl Forest Wapp Army Guard Butler

Whiteman AFB AF Active Johnson

MONTANA

Great Falls IAP AF Guard Cascade

Helena Aviation RC- AASF- C12 Army Guard Lewis and Clark

Malmstrom Air Force Base AF Active Cascade

MTA Ft Wm Henry Harrison Army Guard Lewis and Clark

MTA Limestone Hills Army Guard Broadwater

NEBRASKA

Camp Ashland Army Guard Sarpy

Grand Island AASF/RC Army Guard Hall

Greenlief TS/UTES 01 Army Guard Clay

Lincoln AASF/Readiness Center Army Guard Lancaster

Lincoln MAP AF Guard Lancaster

Mead TS/FMS 06/Utes 02 Army Guard Saunders

Offutt Air Force Base AF Active Sarpy

NEVADA

Anthony Cometa Complex Army Guard Clark

Creech Air Force Base AF Active Clark

Fallon Range Complex Navy Active Churchill

Floyd Edsall Training Center Army Guard Clark

Hawthorne Army Depot Army Active Mineral

Nellis Air Force Base AF Active Clark

Nevada Test and Training Range AF Active Nye

Reno Tahoe IAP AF Guard Washoe

123
124 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

NEW HAMPSHIRE Military Ocean Tml Sunny Point Army Active Brunswick

New Boston Air Station AF Active Hillsborough MTA Camp Butner Army Guard Granville

Newington Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Rockingham Oak Grove MC Active Jones

NG Training Site Army Guard Strafford OLF Atlantic MC Active Carteret

Pease ANGB AF Guard Rockingham Raleigh Army Guard Wake

Seymour Johnson Air Force Base AF Active Wayne

NEW JERSEY 

Atlantic City IAP AF Guard Atlantic NORTH DAKOTA 

Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst AF Active Burlington Bismarck RJB Complex Army Guard Burleigh

Lawrenceville Army Guard Mercer Camp Grafton Army Guard Eddy

Naval Weapons Station Earle NJ Navy Active Monmouth Cavalier Air Force Station AF Active Pembina

Picatinny Arsenal Army Active Morris Grand Forks AFB AF Active Grand Forks

Sea Girt NJ NGTC Army Guard Monmouth Grand Forks Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Grand Forks

Hector IAP AF Guard Cass

NEW MEXICO Minot Air Force Base AF Active Ward

Cannon AFB AF Active Curry

Holloman Air Force Base AF Active Otero OHIO 

Kirtland Air Force Base AF Active Bernalillo Beightler Armory Army Guard Franklin

Las Cruces Army Guard Doña Ana Bratenahl Navy Active Cuyahoga

Melrose Air Force Range AF Active Roosevelt Camp James A. Garfield JM Training Center Army Guard Portage

Rio Rancho TS Army Guard Sandoval Camp Perry Joint Training Center Army Guard Ottawa

Santa Fe - Onate Complex TS Army Guard Santa Fe Camp Sherman Joint Training Center Army Guard Ross

White Sands Missile Range Army Active Sierra Defense Supply Center Columbus Army Active Franklin

McConnelsville Training Site Army Guard Morgan

NEW YORK Rickenbacker Army Guard Franklin

Brooklyn NY MC Reserve Kings Rickenbacker AF Guard Franklin

Camp Smith Tng Site Army Guard Westchester Springfield Beckley AF Guard Clark

Fort Drum Army Active Jefferson Toledo/Exp Airport AF Guard Lucas

Fort Hamilton Army Active Kings U.S. Army JSMC Lima Army Active Allen

Francis S Gabreski Airport AF Guard Suffolk Wright-Patterson Air Force Base AF Active Greene

Hancock Field AF Guard Onondaga Youngstown Air Reserve Station AF Reserve Trumbull

Niagara Falls AF Reserve Niagara

NSA Saratoga Springs NY Navy Active Saratoga OKLAHOMA 

Rome Research Laboratory AF Active Oneida Altus AFB AF Active Jackson

Schenectady ANG MAP AF Guard Schenectady Camp Gruber Army Guard Muskogee

Stewart Annex Army Active Orange Fort Sill Army Active Comanche

Stewart IAP AF Guard Orange Kegelman Air Force Auxiliary Field AF Active Alfalfa

Syracuse MCRC MC Reserve Onondaga Lexington AASF No 1 Army Guard Cleveland

Verona Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Oneida McAlester AAP Army Active Pittsburg

Watervliet Arsenal Army Active Albany Muskogee AFRC Army Guard Muskogee

West Point Military Reservation Army Active Orange Norman CSMS Army Guard Cleveland

Youngstown Tng Site Army Guard Niagara Tinker Aerospace Complex AF Active Oklahoma

Tinker Air Force Base AF Active Oklahoma

NORTH CAROLINA Tulsa IAP AF Guard Tulsa

MC Active Carteret Vance AFB AF Active Garfield

Army Active Durham Will Rogers World Airport AF Guard Oklahoma

Army Active Scotland

AF Guard Mecklenburg OREGON 

AF Active Dare Biak Training Center COUTES Army Guard Deschutes

Army Active Hoke Camp Adair Corvallis Army Guard Benton

MC Active Craven Camp Withycombe Clackamas Army Guard Clackamas

MC Active Onslow Kingsley Field Cantonement Site 1 AF Guard Klamath

ALF Bogue

Army Research Lab --Raleigh Durham

Camp MacKall

Charlotte/Douglas IAP

Dare County Range

Fort Liberty (formerly Fort Bragg)

Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point

Marine Corps Air Station New River

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune MC Active Onslow Lane County AFRC FMS 5 Army Guard Lane
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

McNary Field Salem AASF Army Guard Marion Holston Army Ammunition Plant Army Active Hawkins

MTA Camp Rilea Army Guard Clatsop Jackson Airport Armory Army Guard Madison

NAVWPNSYSTRAFAC Boardman Navy Active Morrow Johnson City Gray Army Guard Washington

McGhee Tyson Airport AF Guard Blount

PENNSYLVANIA Memphis IAP AF Guard Shelby

Cambridge Springs Readiness Center/FMS 5 Army Guard Crawford Milan AAP Army Active Gibson

Carlisle Barracks Army Active Cumberland Nashville Army Guard Davidson

Collegeville FMS 4 Army Guard Montgomery Nashville IAP AF Guard Davidson

Defense Distrib Depot Susq Army Active York NAVSUPPACT Midsouth Memphis TN Navy Active Shelby

Det Phil Pny Annex Navy Active Philadelphia Northside Mid-South Navy Active Shelby

Fort Indiantown Gap Army Guard Lebanon NSWC Carderock Div Navy Active Shelby

Hollidaysburg Readiness Center Army Guard Blair VTS Milan Army Guard Carroll

Letterkenny Army Depot Army Active Franklin VTS Smyrna Army Guard Rutherford

Naval Support Activity Philadelphia Navy Active Philadelphia

NAVSUPPACT Mechanicsburg PA Navy Active Cumberland TEXAS 

New Castle Readiness Center/FMS 9 Army Guard Lawrence AF Active Tarrant

Pittsburgh IAP ANG AF Guard Allegheny Navy Active Nueces

Pittsburgh IAP ARS AF Reserve Allegheny Navy Active Jim Wells

Scranton AAP Army Active Lackawanna Navy Active Nueces

Spring City Readiness Center Army Guard Chester Army Active Travis

Tobyhanna Army Depot Army Active Monroe Army Guard Travis

Army Guard Brown

RHODE ISLAND Army Guard Travis

Camp Fogarty Tng Site Army Guard Kent Army Guard Lamar

Fort Adams RI Navy Active Newport Army Guard Bastrop

Gould Island RI Navy Active Newport Navy Active McMullen

Naval Station Newport Navy Active Newport AF Active Taylor

Quonset State Airport AF Guard Washington AF Guard Harris

Army Active El Paso

SOUTH CAROLINA Army Active Coryell

Fort Jackson Army Active Richland Army Guard Parker

Joint Base Charleston AF Active Berkeley Army Guard Tarrant

Joint Base Charleston North Field SBML AF Active Orangeburg AF Active Tom Green

Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort MC Active Beaufort Army Reserve Dallas

McEntire Joint National Guard Base AF Guard Richland AF Active Bexar

MCRD Beaufort MC Active Beaufort AF Active Val Verde

MTA Clarks Hill Reservation Army Guard McCormick Army Guard Bexar

NAVSUPPFAC Beaufort SC Navy Active Beaufort Navy Active Goliad

Poinsett Electronic Combat Range AF Active Sumter Navy Active Nueces

Shaw Air Force Base AF Active Sumter Navy Active Tarrant

Navy Active Kleberg

SOUTH DAKOTA Army Active Bowie

Camp Rapid Army Guard Pennington Army Guard Tarrant

Ellsworth AFB AF Active Meade AF Active Wichita

Ellsworth AFB Site 2 AF Active Pennington

Air Force Plant 4

ALF Cabaniss

ALF Orange

ALF Waldron

Army Futures Command

Bergstrom - (Abia)

Camp Bowie (State)

Camp Mabry

Camp Maxey

Camp Swift

Dixie Target Range

Dyess AFB

Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base

Fort Bliss

Fort Cavazos (formerly Fort Hood)

Fort Wolters

Fort Worth - Shoreview

Goodfellow AFB

Grand Prairie Reserve Complex

Joint Base San Antonio Laughlin 

AFB

Martindale - AASF

NALF Goliad

NAS Corpus Christi TX

NAS Fort Worth JRB TX

NAS Kingsville TX

Red River Army Depot

Saginaw

Sheppard AFB

Yankee Target Range Navy Active McMullen

Joe Foss Field AF Guard Minnehaha

Mitchell Complex Army Guard Davison UTAH 

Sioux Falls Benson Rd Complex Army Guard Minnehaha Hill Air Force Base AF Active Davis

West Camp Army Guard Pennington MTA-L Camp Williams Army Guard Utah

NAVPMOSSP Magna Utah Navy Active Salt Lake

TENNESSEE Saint George/FMS 5B Army Guard Washington

Arnold Air Force Base AF Active Coffee Salt Lake City IAP AF Guard Salt Lake

Fort Campbell Army Active Montgomery Tooele Army Depot Army Active Tooele

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 125
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

Joint

Site Service County Base

Joint

Site Service County Base

Tooele Army Depot South Army Active Tooele

Utah Test and Training Range AF Active Tooele

West Desert Test Center Army Active Tooele

VERMONT

Burlington IAP AF Guard Chittenden

Ethan Allen AFB MTA Army Guard Chittenden

TS Camp Johnson Army Guard Chittenden

TS Ethan Allen Range Army Guard Chittenden

Westminster Training Site Army Guard Windham

VIRGINIA

Air Force Office of Scientific Research WHS Arlington

ALF Fentress Chesapke Navy Active Chesapeake City

Arlington National Cemetery Army Active Arlington

Arlington Service Ctr Navy Active Arlington

Camp Pendleton SMR Army Guard Virginia Beach City

Cheatham Annex Navy Active York

Craney Island Navy Active Portsmouth City

DARPA WHS Arlington

Def Gen Supply Center Army Active Chesterfield

Elizabeth Rvr Channel Navy Active Portsmouth City

Fire Fighters School Navy Active Norfolk City

Fort Walker (formerly Fort A.P. Hill) Army Active Caroline

Fort Belvoir Army Active Fairfax

Fort Gregg-Adams (formerly Fort Lee) Army Active Prince George

Fort Barfoot (formerly Fort Pickett) Army Guard Nottoway

JEB Little Creek-Fort Story Navy Active Virginia Beach City

JEBLCFS Wallops Island Navy Active Accomack

Joint Base Langley-Eustis AF Active Newport News City

Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall Army Active Arlington

Lafayette Rvr Complex Navy Active Norfolk City

Marine Corps Base Quantico MC Active Stafford

Mark Center WHS Alexandria City

Naval Air Station Oceana Navy Active Virginia Beach City

Naval Station Norfolk Navy Active Norfolk City

Naval Support Facility Dahlgren Navy Active King George

Naval Weapons Station Yorktown Navy Active York

NAVMEDCEN Portsmouth VA Navy Active Portsmouth City

NAVSUPPACT Hampton Roads VA Navy Active Norfolk City

NAVSUPPACT Norfolk NSY Navy Active Portsmouth City

NNSY South Gate Navy Active Portsmouth City

NNSY St Helena Navy Active Norfolk City

Northwest Chesapeake VA Navy Active Chesapeake City

Pentagon WHS Arlington

Pumpkin Neck Navy Active King George

Radford Army Ammunition Plant Army Active Montgomery

Rivanna Station Army Active Albemarle

Sandson AASF Army Guard Henrico

SDA Area Navy Active Norfolk City

St Juliens Creek East Navy Active Chesapeake City

Yorktown Fuel Depot Navy Active York

WASHINGTON

Bremerton Army Guard Kitsap

CNI NAVMAG Indian Island Navy Active Jefferson

Cusick Survival Training Site AF Active Pend Oreille

Fairchild Air Force Base AF Active Spokane

Jim Creek Navy Active Snohomish

Joint Base Lewis-McChord Army Active Pierce

Manchester Navy Active Kitsap

Marysville WA Navy Active Snohomish

Naval Air Station Whidbey Island Navy Active Island

Naval Base Kitsap Bangor Navy Active Kitsap

Naval Base Kitsap Bremerton WA Navy Active Kitsap

Naval Base Kitsap --Keyport Navy Active Kitsap

NAVSTA Everett WA Navy Active Snohomish

OLF Coupeville Navy Active Island

Sea Plane Base Navy Active Island

Shipyard Puget Sound Navy Active Kitsap

White Bluff AF Active Spokane

WEST VIRGINIA

Allegany Ballistics Lab Navy Active Mineral

Biometric Technology Center Army Active Harrison

CTC Camp Dawson-Kingwood Army Guard Preston

Elkins AFRC Army Guard Randolph

EWVRA Shepherd Field AF Guard Berkeley

Jackson County AFRC Army Guard Jackson

McLaughlin ANGB AF Guard Kanawha

Volkstone Army Guard Preston

Williamstown Army Guard Wood

WISCONSIN

Camp Williams Tomah MTA Army Guard Juneau

Fort McCoy Army Reserve Monroe

Gen Mitchell IAP AF Guard Milwaukee

Hardwood Range AF Guard Juneau

Truax ANGB AF Guard Dane

Volk ANGB AF Guard Juneau

W Silver Spring Complex Army Reserve Milwaukee

WYOMONG

Cheyenne Regional Airport AF Guard Laramie

Francis E. Warren Air Force Base AF Active Laramie

MTCH Camp Guernsey Army Guard Platte

Source: Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas data Fiscal Year 2020, from 

authoritative sources provided to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Energy, Installations, and Environment by Component Installation Geospatial Information 

and Services Programs.

126
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

APPENDIX 2: METHODOLOGY

A. Defense Contracts

This section refers to U.S. Department of Defense (DoD)

contract obligations during fiscal year (FY) 2022

(i.e., October 1, 2021 through September 30, 2022). DoDfunded grant awards and gross pay, which are discussed in

sections F and G respectively, are the only other types of

defense spending included in this his report.

This report analyzes contract obligation because contracts 

are the principal method through which the DoD and other 

federal agencies spend money. The phrase “contract 

spending” reflects federal agencies’ use of contracts with 

suppliers to purchase all products and services over a 

legally specified threshold, which increased to $5,000 on 

April 13, 2018, and to $10,000 on August 31, 2018 (federal 

agencies can use agency credit cards to buy products and 

services valued at less than those amounts). While the DoD 

and other federal agencies obligate funds through other 

means, those payments comprise a small percentage of the 

DoD’s total expenditures.

2

Contract obligation amounts are calculated from data 

obtained through USAspending.gov, a publicly available 

database of unclassified federal spending maintained by 

the U.S. Department of the Treasury. All relevant 

transaction records downloaded from USAspending.gov, 

just over 32 million in total, listed the DoD as the “funding 

agency,” and most of those records (99 percent) also listed 

the DoD as the “awarding agency.” Contract spending 

amounts reflect obligations rather than actual 

expenditures. Totals are comprised of:

• Contract prime awards that federal agencies

provide to private- and public-sector

organizations and individuals for products

(e.g., clothing and ships) and services (e.g.,

information technology and research 

and development), and

• Sub-awards that prime award recipients provide

to sub-contractors.3

Contract spending figures in this report have not been 

adjusted for inflation.

Prime and Sub-Award Reporting

Steps were taken to ensure the prime and sub-award 

data were accurately reported. In cases where a 

prime contractor sub-contracted another vendor, the 

sub-contract amount was subtracted from the prime 

contractor’s total, as well as the totals for the state 

and county in which the prime contractor was located. 

Moreover, the amount was added to the sub-contractor’s 

total and the spending for the state and county in which 

the sub-contractor was located.

Fiscal Years for Contract Spending

This report incorporates two different methods for 

assigning contract prime and sub-awards to a particular 

fiscal year. The researchers allocated spending associated 

with prime awards to the fiscal year in which the prime 

award was obligated, and allocated all subsequent 

additions and subtractions of funds to the fiscal year in 

which those funding changes occurred. For example, if a 

prime award of $100 was signed on March 1, 2017, then 

the $100 in funds was allocated to FY 2017. If the DoD 

added $50 to the contract on October 15, 2017, then 

such funds were assigned to FY 2018. If the DoD 

deducted $25 from the same prime award on April 30, 

2019, then that deduction was allocated to FY 2019.

Contract sub-award amounts were deducted from the 

original fiscal year in which the associated prime award

2

 Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, “Class Deviation - Micro-Purchase Threshold, Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and Special 

Emergency Procurement Authority,” August 31, 2018, https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA002260-18-DPC.pdf.

3

 In accordance Federal Acquisition Regulation clause 52.204-10 (Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards), prime contractors awarded a 

federal contract or order are required to file a sub-award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime contractor awards any subcontract 

greater than $30,000. (General Services Administration, “About FFATA,” accessed August 9, 2023, https://www.fsrs.gov/#a-faqs).

This section contains additional details on the processes applied to derive the statistics provided in the state profiles 

throughout this report, as well as information on the military installations depicted in the maps in those profiles.

127
128 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

was made and added to the fiscal year during which the 

sub-award was made. Continuing with the previous 

example, if a prime award of $100 was signed in FY 2017 

and the contractor issued a $25 sub-award in FY 2017, 

then the $25 is deducted from the prime contractor’s total 

and added to the sub-contractor’s figures for FY 2017. In 

this case, FY 2017 is the year during which both the prime 

and sub-awards were made. If the contractor issued a 

subsequent $25 sub-award in FY 2018, then that $25 was 

deducted from FY 2017 and added to FY 2018.

B. Defense Contracts, By Type

This represents the proportion of total prime award

spending in a state or the District of Columbia that went to

four product and service categories: construction, research

and development, service, and supplies and equipment. The

list of legacy Better Buying Portfolio categories on the DoD’s

Product Service Code (PSC) Selection Tool was used to

categorize the spending on the products and services

identified by the PSC listed in each prime award record.4 The 

federal government uses these codes to identify

the products or services that comprise the majority of

spending in a prime award contract. Sub-award records do

not contain such a code or any other product or service

identifier. Therefore, sub-award spending was categorized

by the PSC of the prime award against which the sub-award

was made.

C. Defense Contracts, By Service

This statistic is the percentage of defense contract spending

in a state or the District of Columbia that was funded by the

Military Services or other DoD activities in FY 2022. For

prime awards, the “Funding Sub Agency Code” field was

used to identify the specific agency that funded an award.

For sub-awards, the Funding Sub Agency Code listed for the

associated prime award was used to identify the funding

agency for the sub-award. All awards identifying the U.S.

Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force were

categorized as “Army,” “Navy/Marines,” and “Air Force.”

All other DoD activities, such as the Defense Health Agency 

or Defense Logistics Agency, are categorized as “Other 

Defense.”

D. Top Defense Contractors

This list includes the private- and public-sector contractors

that were among the ten biggest recipients of DoD

spending in a state or the District of Columbia during FY

2022.

Researchers identified contractors using the name 

of the ultimate parent of the contract recipient, if a parent 

recipient was provided in the contract records. 

If no parent recipient was recorded, the researchers 

identified contractors by their individual recipient names. 

Researchers conducted rigorous quality assurance on the 

list of all contractor names to remove inconsistent names 

used for the same recipients. Researchers also reviewed 

recent mergers and acquisitions among defense 

contractors to standardize changing recipient names over 

the eight-year period of interest.

E. Contract Awards Performed, By Fiscal Year

These numbers represent total defense contract awards in

a state or the District of Columbia for each fiscal year since

2015. Calculated according to the methodology described

in Section A, these figures include both prime and subawards, and are often different from those listed in

previous versions of this report. These differences reflect

contract modifications (e.g., the addition/reduction of

funds) that occurred after the data were obtained for the

prior reports, as well as the methods used to assign prime

and sub-awards to specific fiscal years. This report reflects

the most current estimates of obligation amounts in each

state in each fiscal year.

F. Defense Grants

This section refers to U.S. Department of Defense (DoD)

grants awarded during fiscal year (FY) 2022 (i.e., October 1,

4

 U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Pricing and Contracting Office, “Product Service Code (PSC) Selection Tool,” accessed August 9, 2023, https://psctool.us/.
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

2021 through September 30, 2022).

Grant awards are a form of financial assistance from the 

DoD (and other federal agencies) to carry out a public 

project or service authorized by United States Law.5

Although most grants are awarded to state and local 

governments, “grant spending” in this report reflects all 

grant obligations to both governmental and 

nongovernmental recipients, and of all types, including 

block grants, formula grants, project grants, and 

cooperative agreements. In comparison to contracts, 

grants represent a small percentage of DoD’s total 

award obligations (2 percent).

As with the contract obligations detailed above, grant 

award amounts are calculated from data obtained 

through USAspending.gov. All of the 23 thousand prime 

award transactions downloaded from USAspending.gov 

for this report listed the DoD as the “funding agency,” 

and most of those records (99 percent) also listed 

the DoD as the “awarding agency.” As with contracts, 

grant spending reflects obligations rather than actual 

expenditures, from both grant prime awards, awarded 

by the federal government to private- and public-sector 

organizations, and grant sub-awards, awarded by those 

recipients to other organizations.

All grant spending in this report is summarized at the 

state level and reflects obligations from FY 2022 prime

awards and sub-awards, including FY 2022 sub-awards 

of pre-FY 2022 prime awards. The location of both 

prime-award grant spending and sub-award grant 

spending was allocated to the award recipient state. 

Obligations for FY 2022 sub-grants of FY 2022 prime 

grants were allocated to the sub-award recipient state 

and deducted from the prime-award recipient state.

Grant spending figures in this report have not been 

adjusted for inflation.

G. Defense Personnel

This section refers to the total active duty, civilian, National

Guard, and Reserve personnel in a state or the District of

Columbia in FY 2022. Defense payroll figures represent the

total gross pay received by those personnel through FY

2022, while personnel counts reflect the levels on

September 30, 2022. These data are from the DoD’s

Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC). Readers are

cautioned not to compare personnel counts from the

Defense Spending by State FY 2016 report to the FY 2022

report. As was the case in the FY 2017 through FY 2021

reports, this report reflects DMDC data for all personnel

corresponding to a single snapshot in time (September 30,

2022) rather than over the course of the fiscal year.

Readers may notice that states with a large Navy/Marine 

presence (e.g., California, Washington, Virginia, and South 

Carolina) appear to have significantly increased 

in personnel and payroll from the FY 2017 version of 

this report. This is due to a change in how DMDC counts 

personnel. Personnel who previously appeared to be 

assigned to Armed Forces Americas or Armed Forces 

Europe are reported in FY 2018 through FY 2022 in their 

home-port state, but with an APO/FPO zip code of their 

current overseas location. Since APO/FPO zip codes do not 

have corresponding counties, their county is unknown, but 

they are included in state totals.

H. Military Installations

The installations depicted in the maps throughout this

report are drawn from the DoD’s “Military Installations,

Ranges, and Training Areas” (MIRTA) dataset. The “MIRTA”

dataset contains geospatial data (i.e., latitude and

longitude) on the point locations and boundaries of DoD

facilities listed in the DoD’s 2020 Base Structure Report.

The points represent the centers or near-centers of DoD

sites, and the boundaries comprise federally owned or

managed land. The point centers were used to infer the

relevant county name via the Federal Communications

129

5 USAspending.gov glossary official definition of grant: “A federal financial assistance award making payment in cash or in kind for a specified purpose. The federal 

government is not expected to have substantial involvement with the state or local government or other recipient while the contemplated activity is being performed. 

The term ‘grant’ is used broadly and may include a grant to nongovernmental recipients as well as one to a state or local government, while the term ‘grant-in-aid’ is 

commonly used to refer only to a grant to a state or local government. (For a more detailed description, see the Federal Grant and Cooperative Agreement Act of 1977, 

31 U.S.C. §§ 6301–6308.) The two major forms of federal grants-in-aid are block and categorical.” (USAspending.gov, “Glossary”, accessed August 15, 2023, https://www. 

usaspending.gov/?glossary=grant).
130 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

Communications Commission’s geolocation service,

http://geo.fcc.gov/api/census. The dataset is in a 

shapefile format, which is common for geographic 

information systems, and conforms to the World 

Geodetic System 1984, a frequently used terrestrial 

reference system referred to as “WGS84.” The data are 

in decimal degrees. Many facilities in the “MIRTA” 

dataset include subordinate sites. For various reasons, 

not all military installations are included.

6

6

 U.S Department of Defense, “Release Notes: Military Installations, Ranges, and Training Areas (Point Locations and Boundaries),” September 17, 2021, https://www.acq.

osd.mil/eie/bsi/bei_disdi.html.

U.S. Department of Defense

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation

2231 Crystal Drive, Suite 520, Arlington, VA 22202

703-697-2130 | www.oldcc.gov