alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5220 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 6, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3800 SW. 185th Avenue in Beaverton, Oregon, as the ‘‘Major Arthur Chin Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

HR 5220 RFS

1 SECTION 1. MAJOR ARTHUR CHIN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 3800 SW. 185th Avenue in Bea4 verton, Oregon, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Major Arthur Chin Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Major Arthur Chin 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5370 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain gelatins. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain gelatins. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN GELATINS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new headings: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Gelatin (CAS No. 68915–24– 

2) (provided for in subheading 3503.00.55) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011

9902.01.00 Gelatin (CAS No. 68915–24– 

2) (provided for in subheading 3503.00.55) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011

9902.01.00 Gelatin (CAS No. 68915–24– 

2) (provided for in subheading 3503.00.55) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5370 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of High Grade Mining Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended February 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert M. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 13rd day of April, 2004.



| | /s/ Robert M. Baker                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert M. Baker                                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2017186EN.01000201.xml

| 10.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 8 June 2017

adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2017

(2017/C 186/03)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (1) and in particular Article 41 thereof,

1

Whereas:

| — | the Union’s budget for the financial year 2017 was definitively adopted on 1 December 2016 (2), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union’s budget for the financial year 2017 was definitively adopted on 1 December 2016 (2),

2

| — | on 12 April 2017, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 2 to the general budget for the financial year 2017, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 12 April 2017, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 2 to the general budget for the financial year 2017,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole article

The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 2 of the European Union for the financial year 2017 was adopted on 8 June 2017.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 8 June 2017.

For the Council

The President

U. REINSALU

---

(1)  OJ L 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 51, 28.2.2017, p. 1.

2

---
Exhibit 10.3


 





FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT


 


 


This First Amendment to the Development
Agreement (“Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of July 26, 2019, by and between IIP-MA 1 LLC (“Landlord”),
IIP Operating Partnership, LP (“Parent Company”), and Pharmacannis Massachusetts Inc. (“Tenant”), together
the (“Parties”).


 


 


RECITALS


 


A.         Landlord and Tenant
entered into a Lease Agreement (the “Lease”) dated May 31, 2018 concerning the lease of certain premises located at
Lot 1, Hopping Brook Road, Holliston, MA, 01746, as further defined in the Lease.


 


B.         Landlord and Tenant
desire to amend the Lease as set forth herein to correct certain drafting errors.


 


 


AGREEMENT


 


1.       Paragraph A of the
Development Agreement Recitals is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety to read as follows:


 


“WHEREAS, concurrent with the execution
of this Agreement, Landlord acquired certain real property located at 465 Hopping Brook Road, Holliston, Massachusetts, 01746,
as more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the “Land”);.”


 


2.       Paragraph C of the
Development Agreement Recitals is hereby amended to strike the word “medical” from the description of Tenant’s
intended use.


 


3.        All other provisions
of the Lease, including those incorporated by prior amendment or agreement, shall remain in full force and are hereby ratified
and affirmed. In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions contained in this Amendment and those contained in
the Lease or any prior amendment or agreement, the terms and provisions contained herein will supersede and control any obligations
and liabilities of the Parties.


 






     


     


    

 


4.        This Amendment
may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all signing parties had signed the same document. All
counterparts will be construed together and constitute the same document. Signature pages may be detached from the counterparts
and attached to a single copy to physically form one document.


 


 


 


 


 


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]


 






     


     


    

 


DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT SIGNATURE
PAGE


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
executed this Amendment as of the date first written below.


 


 


	LANDLORD:	 
	IIP-MA 1 LLC	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Brian Wolfe	 
	Name: Brian Wolfe
	Title: Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	 	 
	PARENT COMPANY:	 
	IIP OPERATING PARTNERSHIP,
    LP	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Brian Wolfe	 
	Name: Brian Wolfe
	Title: Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
	 	 
	TENANT:	 
	PHARMACANNIS MASSACHUSETTS,
    INC.	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Teddy Scott	 
	Name: Teddy Scott
	Title: President
STATE v. SHUE

No. COA05-244

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Alamance (02CRS52625, 02CRS52626).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended January 31, 2006 (the "Report") of SE Financial  Corp.  (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof, I, Pamela
M.  Cyr,  President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,  and  Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal  Executive  and  Financial &  Accounting  Officer),  hereby  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: March 17, 2006    /s/Pamela M. Cyr
                        --------------------------------------------------------
                        Pamela M. Cyr
                        President & CEO
                        (Principal Executive and Financial & Accounting Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5472 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5472

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 2650 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, as the 
                ``Julia M. Carson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. JULIA M. CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2650 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Street, Indianapolis, 
Indiana, shall be known and designated as the ``Julia M. Carson Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Julia M. 
Carson Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
STATE v. LINNEY.

No. COA04-497.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 7, 2005.

Certification Date June 27, 2005.

Appeal from Buncombe (96CRS8146, 96CRS8147, 96CRS8150)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
IN RE K.H.H.

No. COA05-407.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Anson (03J52).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Table of Contents

Exhibit32.2

GLOBAL SIGNAL INC.CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Global Signal Inc., (the‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the periodending March  31,  2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Steven G. Osgood, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                    |
|--|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                   |
|--|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of theCompany. |

/s/ Steven G.OsgoodSteven G. OsgoodExecutive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer

May10,  2006

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Global SignalInc. and will be retained by Global Signal Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

This certification accompanies this Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shallnot, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the ‘‘Exchange Act’’).Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theExchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specificallyincorporates it by reference.

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5564 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5564

To amend title 38, United States Code, to exclude an individual who has 
   been convicted of committing certain sex offenses from receiving 
certain burial-related benefits and funeral honors which are otherwise 
available to certain veterans, members of the Armed Forces, and related 
                  individuals, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2008

Mr. Shadegg (for himself, Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. Poe, Mr. Bachus, and 
Mr. Fossella) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to exclude an individual who has 
   been convicted of committing certain sex offenses from receiving 
certain burial-related benefits and funeral honors which are otherwise 
available to certain veterans, members of the Armed Forces, and related 
                  individuals, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as ``Jenny's Law''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF PERSONS CONVICTED OF COMMITTING CERTAIN SEX 
              OFFENSES FROM RECEIVING CERTAIN BURIAL-RELATED BENEFITS 
              AND FUNERAL HONORS.

    (a) Prohibition Against Interment or Memorialization in National 
Cemetary Administration, Arlington National Cemetary, and Certain State 
Veterans' Cemetaries, and Termination of Provision of Presidential 
Memorial Certificate, Flag, and Headstone or Marker.--Section 2411(b) 
of title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new paragraph:
            ``(4) A person who is classified as a tier III sex offender 
        under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act.''.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
to terminate any benefit available to any person except those benefits 
specifically terminated by the amendment made by subsection (a).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to interments and memorializations that occur on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY.

    The constitutional authority on which this Act rests is the power 
of Congress to make rules for the government and regulation of the land 
and naval forces, as enumerated in article I, section 8, clause 14 of 
the United States Constitution.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Chester Stanton, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 342]

*577Crew III, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered September 19, 2002, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), assault in the second degree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree.

Defendant was indicted and charged with two counts of rape in the first degree, two counts of sodomy in the first degree, two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree, assault in the second degree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree as the result of defendant beating and sexually assaulting his former wife. Following a jury trial, defendant was acquitted of those counts of the indictment charging rape and sodomy and convicted of those counts charging sexual abuse, assault and unlawful imprisonment. As a consequence, defendant was sentenced to terms of imprisonment of seven years for each of the felony convictions and a sentence of one year for unlawful imprisonment, said sentences to run concurrently.

Defendant contends that the verdicts acquitting him of rape and convicting him of sexual abuse are repugnant in that County Court charged, with regard to each count, that the jury must find penetration. In this regard, we need note only that the repugnancy claim was not raised before the jury was discharged and, therefore, was not preserved for our review, and we decline to do so in the interest of justice *(see e.g. People v Alfaro,*66 NY2d 985, 987 [1985]).

With regard to defendant’s contention that County Court erred in failing to give a circumstantial evidence charge, we again note that counsel failed to object to the alleged error rendering the issue unpreserved for our review *(see generally People v Pierorazio, 304*AD2d 973, 974-975 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 585 [2003]). In any event, were we to consider the issue, we would find it without merit inasmuch as the charges here are supported with both circumstantial and direct evidence and, under such circumstances, the court was not required to give a circumstantial evidence charge *(see e.g. People v Lewis,*300 AD2d 827, 829 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 630 [2003]).

Finally, we do not perceive defendant’s sentence to have been harsh and excessive considering the nature of the offenses and defendant’s extensive criminal history. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions, including his assertion that the verdict was not supported by legally sufficient evidence, and find them equally without merit.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of B&GFoods, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 1, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Robert C. Cantwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Robert C. Cantwell  |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Robert C. Cantwell      |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| April  27, 2006         |

 

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
In re WACHOVIA SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION appealed by Wachovia Shareholder.

No. 106P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

G. Gray Wilson, Linda L. Helms, Winston-Salem, Stephen T. Rodd, New York, NY, Russell M. Robinson, Martin L. Brackett, Jr., Robert W. Fuller, Katherine Gordon Maynard, William K. Davis, Charlotte, James T. Williams, Jr., Greensboro, Francis C. Clark, Deputy General Counsel, for Wachovia Corporation.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of February 2005 by Plaintiffs (Wachovia Shareholders) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2005."
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 13-662C

(Filed September 22, 2017)

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

*

*

ALLEN ENGINEERING *

CONTRACTOR INC., *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

v. *

*

THE UNITED STATES, *

*

Defendant. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

SCHEDULING ORDER

As discussed at today’s status conference, defendant’s Motion for 

Enlargement of Discovery Deadlines is GRANTED. Plaintiff opposed this motion, 

which sought to extend deadlines roughly six weeks beyond what plaintiff believed 

to be reasonable. But all of plaintiff’s claims in this matter have been brought 

under the Contract Disputes Act --- which provides for interest accruing from the 

date a claim was received by the contracting officer, see 41 U.S.C. § 7109 --- and 

thus, if plaintiff succeeds on the merits it will be compensated for any delay in its 

receipt of damages. Plaintiff has identified no prejudice which might result from 

the additional delay, and defendant’s counsel has persuasively explained the 

conflicts and previous scheduling difficulties which have necessitated the request. 

Accordingly, the motion is granted, and the government’s proposed, revised

schedule is adopted as follows:

1. January 12, 2018: close of fact discovery;

2. February 16, 2018: service by plaintiff of expert reports;

3. March 23, 2018: service by defendant of expert reports; and

4. April 20, 2018: close of expert discovery.
- 2 -

The parties shall file a joint status report on or by May 11, 2018, proposing a 

schedule for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Victor J. Wolski 

VICTOR J. WOLSKI

Judge