alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing WorldWide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Marvin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

/S/ JAMES MARVIN
-----------------------
James Marvin
Chief Financial Officer
May 16, 2005
STATE v. BRAYBOY.

No. COA05-437.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Robeson (03CRS50400).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. William DERBECK.

No. 203P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of June 2005 by Defendant to Preserve Evidence in Court's Custody:

*853"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 18th day of August 2005."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2 p.m. on Thursday, July 14, 2022.

      ( print page 41375)    

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: July 7, 2022.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-14859 Filed 7-8-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit
        32.1
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of International Food Products
        Group, Inc. (the “ ***Company*** ”),
        for
        the year ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “ ***Report*** ”),
        I,
        Joseph R. Rodriguez, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant
        to 18
        U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
        2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 /s/
        Joseph R. Rodriguez, Jr.
 __________________________________________
 Joseph
        R.
        Rodriguez, Jr.
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 
 Dated:  January
        17, 2006
 
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        International Food Products Group, Inc. and will be retained by International
        Food Products Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
        Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5550 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5550

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the maximum age to 
 qualify for coverage as a ``child'' under the health benefits program 
                         for Federal employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2008

  Mr. Davis of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mrs. 
   Maloney of New York, Mr. Cummings, Ms. Norton, and Mr. Sarbanes) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to increase the maximum age to 
 qualify for coverage as a ``child'' under the health benefits program 
                         for Federal employees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN MAXIMUM AGE TO QUALIFY FOR COVERAGE AS A 
              ``CHILD''.

    (a) In General.--Section 8901(5) of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by striking 
        ``22 years of age'' and inserting ``25 years of age''; and
            (2) in the matter following subparagraph (B), by striking 
        ``age 22'' and inserting ``age 25''.
    (b) Self and Family Coverage for a Former Spouse.--Section 
8905(c)(2)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by striking ``22 years of age'' and 
        inserting ``25 years of age''; and
            (2) in clause (ii), by striking ``age 22'' and inserting 
        ``age 25''.
    (c) Effective Date.--This Act and the amendments made by this Act--
            (1) shall take effect on the first day of the first 
        contract year beginning at least 180 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act; and
            (2) shall apply with respect to health care services or 
        supplies provided on or after the date on which this Act takes 
        effect.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT LIBERTY PHILADELPHIA REO, LP, Respondent

v. EFL PARTNERS V, L.P. AND EFL PARTNERS X, L.P., Petitioners : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 305 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 16th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
# L_2017165EN.01003601.xml

| 28.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 165/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 165/36

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2017/1143

of 26 June 2017

appointing a member, proposed by the French Republic, of the European Economic and Social Committee

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the French Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Michel DUBROMEL, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Michel DUBROMEL,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Arnaud SCHWARTZ, Secrétaire national de France Nature environnement, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 26 June 2017.

For the Council

The President

J. MIZZI

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 September 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 October 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23).

2

---
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2099

Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CF-000736-A-O

_____________________________

TELLY ENGRAM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Marc L. Lubet, Judge.

March 26, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and BROWNLEE, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and David A. Davis, Special 

Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marissa V. Giles, Assistant 

Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
44 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

ILLINOIS 

#20

$9.5 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#46

1.0% OF STATE GDP

1.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$749

PER RESIDENT 

#19

$7.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#15

58,960 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#19

$2.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 2% Development: 3% 

Service: 34%

Supplies and

Equipment: 62%

By Service 

Army

20%

Navy/Marines

15%

Air Force

26%

Other Defense

40%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 19%

Active Duty: 36%

National 

Guard: 23%

Civilian: 22%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

42%

Navy/Marines

36%

Air Force

20%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Northrop Grumman

BP

Cardinal Health

W.S. Darley & Co.

Omnicom Group, Inc.

SupplyCore

Patriot Team

DMS Pharmaceutical

FedEx

General Dynamics

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.1 B

$591.2 M

$517.9 M

$426.9 M

$329.1 M

$250.8 M

$245.9 M

$240.3 M

$238.3 M

$151.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$7.5

FY18

$6.7 $7.0 $7.0

$5.8 $5.2 $5.4

$3.9

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY19 FY20 FY21

$2.5 BILLION 58,960

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Lake

St. Clair

Rock Island

Cook

Sangamon

Peoria

Will

DuPage

Champaign

Winnebago

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

15,816 1,548 213 

4,582 4,206 1,076

365 4,333 381 

349 741 2,311

54 555 2,151

45 385 1,773

11 78 97 

115 142 0 

24 319 276

26 30 424 

Reserve Total

4,412 21,989

1,711 11,575

431 5,510

1,868 5,269

ND ND 

483 2,686

614 800 

463 720 

87 706

199 679
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

 

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

ILLINOIS 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Cook

St. Clair

Lake

DuPage

Winnebago

Williamson

Peoria

Rock Island

Madison

McHenry

(M = millions)

$3.0 B 

$1.3 B

$964.2 M

$744.3 M

$356.2 M

$141.4 M

$127.8 M

$98.4 M

$32.9 M

$30.5 M

St. Clair

Lake

Rock Island

Cook

Sangamon

Peoria

DuPage

Champaign

Macon

Will

$805.6 M

$605.5 M

$421.0 M

$189.5 M

$117.8 M

$88.5 M

$37.4 M

$37.3 M 

$16.1 M

$14.7 M

Lake

Cook

DuPage Rock Island

Peoria

Winnebago McHenry

St. Clair

Williamson

Madison

Lake

Cook

DuPage Rock Island

Peoria

Champaign

St. Clair

Sangamon Macon

Will

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 45

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
STATE v. MOORE.

No. COA05-911.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from Buncombe (00CRS9120, 00CRS9121, 00CRS9122, 00CRS53714, 00CRS53715).

Case without published opinion. Judgment arrested.
# L_2012308EN.01000701.xml

| 8.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 308/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 308/7

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1033/2012

of 26 October 2012

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Cabrito do Alentejo (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Cabrito do Alentejo’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Portugal’s application to register the name ‘Cabrito do Alentejo’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 October 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 52, 22.2.2012, p. 22.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.1.   Fresh meat (and offal)

PORTUGAL

Cabrito do Alentejo (PGI)

---
# L_2012069EN.01000701.xml

| 8.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 69/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 69/7

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 188/2012

of 7 March 2012

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Susina di Dro (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy's application to register the name ‧Susina di Dro‧ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy's application to register the name ‧Susina di Dro‧ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 March 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 185, 25.6.2011, p. 10.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Susina di Dro (PDO)

---
Daniel ZBYTNIUK, Employee, v. ABF FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC. (f/k/a Cardinal Freight Carriers), Employer, Self-Insured.

No. 162P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 1, 2005.

Neil P. Andrews, Nadia Z. Schroth, Charlotte, for ABF Freight Systems, Inc.

Phillip Anthony, Katherine E. Downing, Raleigh, for Daniel Zbytniuk.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of defendant's Petition for Discretionary Review under N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 filed 22 March 2005, the Court allows the petition for the limited purpose of remand to the North Carolina Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of *Edmonds v. Fresenius Medical Care,* 165 N.C.App. 811, 600 S.E.2d 501 (2004), *rev'd per curiam,* 359 N.C. 313, 608 S.E.2d 755 (2005).

By order of the Court in Conference, this 1st day of August, 2005.
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6476

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. GREGORY STEVEN HORN , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. James K. Bredar , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cr - 00138

- JKB

- 1; 1:15

- cv - 03420

- JKB )

Submitted : June 22, 2017 Decided: June 27, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and FLOYD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Gregory Steven Horn, Appellant Pro Se. Rachel Miller Yasser, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gregory S teven Horn seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from the district court’s order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a ce rtificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockr ell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitu tional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Horn has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument be cause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED