alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

[ORBIMED ADVISORS LLC LOGO]

                                                                   June 30, 2003
Physiome Sciences, Inc.
150 College Road West
Suite 500
Princeton, New Jersey 08540-6604
USA

Dear Sirs:

1.    Each of the undersigned, OrbiMed Associates LLC, Caduceus Private
      Investments LP and PW Juniper Crossover Fund L.L.C. (each, an "OrbiMed
      Entity") hereby agrees and undertakes to indemnify you and hold you
      harmless from any Israeli capital gains taxes (including interest,
      linkage, penalties, fines and directly related reasonable attorneys and/or
      accounting fees (together "Taxes")) which you shall pay in connection with
      Israeli withholding tax obligations related to your acquisition of such
      OrbiMed Entity's shares in Predix Pharmaceuticals Ltd., in accordance with
      the Agreement to Purchase All of the Capital Stock of Predix
      Pharmaceuticals Ltd., dated June 30, 2003 (the "Purchase Agreement").

2.    You hereby agree to notify us promptly, in writing to the undersigned at:
      767 Third Avenue, 30th Floor New York, NY 10017 (or to such other address
      as we may advise you in writing) of any tax withholding demand you may
      receive (a "Demand"), and to cooperate with us with regard to such
      Demand. It is hereby specifically clarified that the indemnification set
      forth in Section 1 above is conditioned upon your consent not to take any
      action relating to such Demand unless agreed to, by us, in advance.

3.    The indemnification under this letter is specifically limited to any Taxes
      actually paid by you to the Israeli tax Authorities as set forth herein.

4.    This letter is given solely to Physiome Sciences, Inc. and is neither
      transferable nor assignable to any third party.

5.    This letter shall expire upon the sixth anniversary of the closing date of
      the Purchase Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in case you receive
      a Demand prior to the expiration date, our obligation under Section 1
      above, shall survive the expiration of the letter.

/s/ Eric A. Bittelman                            Eric A. Bittelman
---------------------------------           CFO, OrbiMed  Advisors, LLC
OrbiMed  Associates LLC
By:______________________________

/s/ Eric A. Bittelman                            Eric A. Bittelman
---------------------------------               CFO, OrbiMed Capital
Caduceus Private Investments LP                    General Partner
By:______________________________

/s/ Eric A. Bittelman                            Eric A. Bittelman
---------------------------------              CFO, OrbiMed Advisors, LLC
PW Juniper Crossover Fund L.L.C.
By:______________________________
STATE of North Carolina v. Donquill Lamont SUELL.

No. 541P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Geoffrey W. Hosford, Wilmington, for Donquill Lamont Suell.

Daniel S. Johson, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*370*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 30th day of September 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
72 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

NEVADA

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

By Type

Service: 60%

Construction: 5%

Research and 

Development: 4%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 31%

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions)

Sierra Nevada Corporation $827.7 M

Helix Electric of Nevada $90.4 M

AECOM Global II $81.0 M

Day & Zimmermann Group $67.4 M

Nicholas Construction Services $60.5 M

Computer Sciences Corporation $43.1 M

M1 Support Services $39.0 M

D & D Plumbing $38.0 M

SAIC $29.2 M

CDW Government $27.9 M

$1.8

$1.3 $1.2 $1.3 $1.3 $1.4 $1.4 $1.5

20%

19%

58%

3%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$808.6 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

22,848

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

Military

Clark 18,085 11,684 1,910

Washoe 2,351 202 454

Churchill 1,638 1,183 346

Carson 500 ND 222

Lyon 67 ND ND

Mineral 57 ND 55

Humboldt 29 10 ND

Elko 27 ND ND

White Pine 10 ND ND

Storey ND ND ND

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 29%

Active Duty: 58%

Civilian: 13%

25%

10%

65%

0%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 73

Washoe

Carson City

Humboldt

Douglas

Lyon

Mineral

Nye

Clark

Churchill

Washoe

Carson City

Elko

Douglas

Lyon

Mineral

Nye

Lincoln

Clark

Churchill

Clark County

$670.8 M

Churchill County

$72.0 M

Washoe County 

$43.3 M

Carson City

$15.6 M

Mineral County

$3.8 M

Lyon County

$0.5 M

Storey County

$0.4 M

Nye County

$0.3 M

Douglas County

$0.3 M

Humboldt County

$0.1 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions) (M=millions)

Washoe County

$680.3 M

Clark County

$436.7 M

Churchill County

$154.2 M

Mineral County

$70.6 M

Douglas City

$14.2 M

Carson County

$10.1 M

Lyon County

$10.1 M

Nye County

$0.7 M

Elko County

$0.4 M

Lincoln County

$75.8 K

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS

#37

$2.2 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#30

1.4% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$741

PER RESIDENT

#36

$1.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#32

22,848 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#32

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 NEVADA

(M=millions K=thousands)

Storey

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active
# L_2012075EN.01000101.xml

| 15.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 75/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 75/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 217/2012

of 13 March 2012

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Cinta Senese (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Cinta Senese’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Cinta Senese’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 March 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 200, 8.7.2011, p. 16.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.1.   Fresh meat (and offal)

ITALY

Cinta Senese (PDO)

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5540 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 930
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5540

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2008

                                Received

                             August 1, 2008

                 Read twice and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Gateways and 
Watertrails Network Continuing Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 502 of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 
461 note; Public Law 105-312) is amending by striking subsection (c) 
and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 5, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 930

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5540

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 1, 2008

                 Read twice and placed on the calendar
```
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002





I, Carmine Stella, certify that:





1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Beverage Corporation;





2.           Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;





3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;





4.           I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and I have:





a)           designed such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the registrant and its  subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;





b)           evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and





c)           presented in this annual report my conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and  procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.           I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:





a)           all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)           any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6.           I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date  of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.




Date: April 13, 2010
By:
/s/ Carmine StellaCarmine StellaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1 (906 Cert)

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZHONGPIN INC. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Xianfu
Zhu, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date:    November 14, 2006                           By:/s/ XIANFU ZHU
                                                        ------------------------
                                                        Xianfu Zhu
                                                        Chief Executive Officer


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Anna Danielle CROUSE.

No. 236P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

J. Scott Coalter, High Point, for Anna Danielle Crouse.

Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of May 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
John Andrew CLAYTON, III v. T.H. BRANSON, individually and in his official capacity, The Greensboro Police Department and The City of Greensboro.

No. 370P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Harold F. Greeson, Seth R. Cohen, Greensboro, for John Andrew Clayton, III.

Fred T. Hamlet, Alan W. Duncan, Greensboro, Allison O. Van Laningham, for T.H. Branson, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of July 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
---

Exhibit 13.b

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Roy Wolvin, CFO of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, do hereby certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the information contained in the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009 of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations on Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation Date: March 11, 2010 /s/ Roy WolvinRoy Wolvin
Chief Financial Officer
Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation


---
STATE v. PARKS

No. COA05-987

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Wilson (04CRS50555).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. Eddie Lamar TAYLOR.

No. 719A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 5, 2006.

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Taylor.

William Hart, Senior Deputy Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of December 2005 by Defendant for Additional Time to Procure the Production of Necessary Transcript:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Taylor) shall have up to and including the 13th day of January 2006 to Procure the Production of Necessary Transcript. By order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of January 2006."
COX v. LASSETTER

No. S06A0492.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

January 30, 2006.

Judgment affirmed without opinion.
GODWIN v. BARNES

No. COA04-257-2.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from Wilson (02CVS1224).

Case reported without published opinion. New trial.
**Exhibit 32.1** **Certification**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002     Each of the undersigned, William M. Goodyear, Chairman and Chief    Executive Officer of Navigant Consulting, Inc. (the    “Company”) and Scott J. Krenz, Executive Vice    President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, has    executed this certification in connection with the filing with    the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s    Annual Report on    Form 10-K    for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 (the    “Report”).     Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    the Company. /s/  WILLIAM    M. GOODYEAR    William M. Goodyear    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer     February 28, 2008 /s/  SCOTT    J. KRENZ    Scott J. Krenz    Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer     February 28, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10752

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WILLIAM CLARK PERSCHMANN,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:13-CR-378-1

Before DAVIS, JONES and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent William Clark Perschmann has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Perschmann has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 14, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-10752 Document: 00513154691 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/14/2015
No. 14-10752

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

We note, however, that there is a clerical error in the written judgment, 

which reflects that Perschmann owes a total of $6591 in restitution and 

specifies that Capital One Bank is owed sums of $1070 and $2851, while Green 

Bank is owed $1590. These amounts do not add up to $6591. During 

sentencing, the district court imposed the same total amount of restitution,

listed these three amounts, and also ordered Perschmann to pay restitution in 

the amount of $1080 to Woodforest National Bank. The omission of the amount 

owed to Woodforest National Bank from the written judgment is an apparent 

clerical error. Accordingly, we REMAND for correction of the clerical error in 

the written judgment in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 

36. See United States v. Higgins, 739 F.3d 733, 739 n.16 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 

134 S. Ct. 2319 (2014); United States v. Rosales, 448 F. App’x 466, 466-67 (5th 

Cir. 2011).

 Case: 14-10752 Document: 00513154691 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/14/2015
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                          MARKWEST HYDROCARBON, INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                         (000s, except per share data)


                                                        For the year ended
                                                        December 31, 1997
                                                        ------------------

Net income                                                           7,847

Weighted average number of outstanding
  shares of common stock                                             8,485

Basic earnings per share                                $             0.92
                                                        ==================

Net income                                                           7,847

Weighted average number of outstanding
  shares of common stock                                             8,485
Dilutive stock options                                                 129
                                                        ------------------ 
                                                                     8,614

Earnings per share assuming dilution                    $             0.91
                                                        ==================