alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Louise ETHRIDGE.

No. 134A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 168 N.C.App. 359, 607 S.E.2d 325 (2005), affirming in part and reversing in part defendant's conviction and sentence entered 23 July 2003 by Judge Jerry Braswell in Superior Court, Lenoir County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 September 2005.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Kathleen M. Waylett, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Sue Genrich Berry, Wilmington, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000674

16-JUN-2017

10:05 AM
**Exhibit31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER**

I, David L. Wenner,certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of B&GFoods, Inc.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)   designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)   disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)   allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  October 31, 2005
| /s/ David L. Wenner     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David L. Wenner         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001020186
<NAME>                        CAPITAL BEVERAGE CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         2,088,741
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  401,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                   60,000
<INVENTORY>                                    579,099
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,166,208
<PP&E>                                         75,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                 21,890
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,415,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          709,186
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    3,000
<COMMON>                                       2,379
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,141,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,415,729
<SALES>                                        8,572,985
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,572,985
<CGS>                                          7,984,408
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,984,408
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,829,369
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             57,522
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,181,524)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,181,524)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,181,524)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.53)
        


</TABLE>
PACIFIC ALLIANCE VENTURES LTD.

A Nevada Corporation



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Alliance Ventures Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Velda King, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Gerald R. Tuskey, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.









Dated August 12, 2004

/s/Velda King



Velda King,

President and Chief Executive Officer





/s/Gerald R. Tuskey



Gerald R. Tuskey,

Chief Financial Officer
In the Matter of T.K., D.K., T.K., and J.K.

No. 386A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 613 S.E.2d 739 (2005), affirming a permanency planning order entered 31 October 2003 by Judge Lisa C. Bell in District Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 December 2005.

Tyrone C. Wade, Associate County Attorney, for petitioner-appellee Mecklenburg County Department of Social Services.

Michael E. Casterline, Asheville, for respondent-appellant mother.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
22 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

ARIZONA 

#13

$14.6 B SPENT IN 

#11

3.4% OF STATE GDP

2.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,013

PER RESIDENT 

#10

$12.3 B CONTRACT 

#19

44,233 NUMBER OF 

#20

$2.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 1%

Development: 10%

Service: 18%

Supplies and

Equipment: 71%

By Service 

Army

28%

Navy/Marines

27%

Air Force

26%

Other Defense

19%

Top Defense Contractors 

Raytheon Technologies

Northrop Grumman

Boeing

Honeywell

General Dynamics

Iridium Government Services LLC

Trax International

Jacobs

Patriarch Partners

SEWP Solutions

(M = millions, B = billions)

$6.2 B

$1.3 B

$1.2 B

$905.9 M

$394.1 M

$200.4 M

$108.8 M

$97.8 M

$61.1 M

$59.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$15.7

$13.4

FY18

$12.3 $11.6 $10.4

$8.1 $6.7

FY14

$5.4

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY19 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$2.3 BILLION 44,233

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 17%

National 

Guard: 18%

Active Duty: 43%

Civilian: 22%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

13%

Air Force

Other Defense

3%

Reserve

5,365

1,609

186

30 

442 

ND 

ND 

0 

0 

0 

Total

16,779

13,366

7,046

4,609

1,334

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

39%

45%

County

Maricopa

Pima

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Coconino

Yavapai

Graham

Navajo

La Paz

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

5,207 2,554 3,653

6,299 2,932 2,526

4,072 2,664 124 

3,238 1,278 63

0 152 740 

11 50 413 

13 ND 199 

0 0 39 

0 ND 33 

0 ND 0 

39 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

ARIZONA 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Navajo

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Coconino

Mohave

Yavapai

Maricopa

Pinal Graham

Pima Cochise

Santa Cruz

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

Pima

Maricopa

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Yavapai

Santa Cruz

Coconino

Graham

Mohave

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$6.6 B

$4.7 B

$758.3 M

$250.0 M

$12.5 M

$4.4 M

$4.3 M

$2.9 M

$1.5 M

$664.8 K

Maricopa

Pima

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Coconino

Yavapai

Navajo

Graham

Mohave

$788.4 M

$764.6 M

$473.8 M

$246.0 M

$35.2 M

$16.6 M

$6.6 M

$1.2 M

$730.4 K

$124.3 K

Coconino

Mohave

Yavapai

Maricopa

Yuma Pinal Graham

Pima Cochise

Yuma

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 23

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
March 5, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

SOUTHERN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-12-00377-CV V.

SM ENERGY COMPANY, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, SM Energy 

Company, signed January 20, 2012, was heard on the transcript of the record. We 

have inspected the record and find the trial court erred by granting a final judgment 

when appellant’s third-party claims have not been adjudicated. We therefore order 

that the portions of the judgment that dispose of appellant’s third-party claims are 

REVERSED and ordered severed and REMANDED for proceedings in 

accordance with this court's opinion.

Further, we find no error in the remainder of the judgment and order it 

AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Southern Management Services, Inc., to pay all costs 

incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5483 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, as the ‘‘Private First Class David H. Sharrett 

II Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5483 EH

1 SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS DAVID H. SHARRETT II 

2 POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 10449 White Granite Drive in 

5 Oakton, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Private First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Private First Class 

12 David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5483 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostDavid H. Sharrett II Post Office Building’’. in Oakton, Virginia, as the ‘‘Private First Class al Service located at 10449 White Granite Drive
```

Exhibit 31 - CERTIFICATION

I, James E. Jenkins, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of TS&B Holdings, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact, or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows of the
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures for the issuer and have:

        (i) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
        material information relating to the issuer is made known to me,
        particularly during the period in which the periodic reports are being
        prepared;

        (ii) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and
        procedures as of June 30, 2003 ["Evaluation Date"]; and

        (iii) Presented in the report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
        the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the
        Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons
fulfilling the equivalent function):

        (i) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
        controls which could adversely affect the issuer's ability to record,
        process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
        issuer's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls (none were
        so noted); and

        (ii) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
        other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal
        controls (none were so noted); and

6. I have indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes
in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date: 10/14/03

/s/ James E. Jenkins
-----------------------------
    James E. Jenkins, President
    and Chief Executive Officer
```
IN RE W.A.W.

No. COA05-329.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Buncombe (O2J34).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5378 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Menthyl anthranilate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Menthyl 

anthranilate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MENTHYL ANTHRANILATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.40 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Menthyl anthranilate) is amended by striking the date in 

7 the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5378 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5424 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5424

  To prohibit the charging of any fee for admission to any permanent 
   exhibit in any museum or facility of the Smithsonian Institution.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2008

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the charging of any fee for admission to any permanent 
   exhibit in any museum or facility of the Smithsonian Institution.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Smithsonian Free Admission Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING ADMISSION FEES FOR PERMANENT EXHIBITS AT 
              SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION.

    (a) Prohibiting Admission Fees.--No fee may be charged for 
admission to any exhibit which is part of the permanent collection of 
any museum or facility which is part of any bureau established in or 
under the Smithsonian Institution, including the National Gallery of 
Art.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) does not apply to the exhibition 
entitled ``Butterflies and Plants: Partners in Evolution'' at the 
National Museum of Natural History.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

FILED 

JAN 3 1 7n?3 

Cause No. DA 22-0670 

Bowen c- wood 

Cr....-rk of Supreme Court 

State et Montana 

360 Reclaim, LLC, a Montana Limited Liability Company, 

Plaintiff/Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party 

Plaintiff, and Appellee 

v. 

William M. Russell, an individual, 

Defendant/Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, and Appellant 

And 

Mountain View Investments, L.C., an Idaho Limited Company, 

Co-Defendant/Co-Appellant. 

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Appellant William Russell's motion for extension of time to 

file his opening brief: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that AppellVer is granted an extension of time until 

afch , 2023 to file and serve his opening brief in the above-entitled 

cause. 

Made and entered this 5 l day of , 2023. 

01/31/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0670
**Exhibit 31.1****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, Jack Antonini, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cardtronics, Inc (the “registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects that financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designated such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 14, 2006       /s/ Jack Antonini         Jack Antonini    *President and Chief Executive Officer*
STATE v. LEY

No. COA04-267

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Johnston (00CRS56845, 00CRS56846, 00CRS56847, 00CRS56848, 00CRS56851, 01CRS8383).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
RABON v. CAULDER

No. COA04-1586.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from Robeson (97CVD1691).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
ZALIAGIRIS v. ZALIAGIRIS.

No. 332A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 14, 2005.

Preston O. Odom, III, Charlotte, for Elizabeth Smith Zaliagiris.

Tate Sterrett, Kary C. Watson, Charlotte, for Thomas E. Zaliagiris.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of November 2005 by Plaintiff to Withdraw Appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of November 2005."