alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5314 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5314

   To suspend temporarily the duty on a thermoplastic biodegradable 
                             polymer blend.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

  Mr. Shays introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on a thermoplastic biodegradable 
                             polymer blend.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THERMOPLASTIC BIODEGRADABLE POLYMER BLEND.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902._._         Polymer blend       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          containing 1,4-                                                    31/2011.......
                          benzenedicarboxyl
                          ic acid dimethyl
                          ester,
                          polymerized with
                          1,4-butanediol
                          and decanedioic
                          acid (CAS No.
                          59914-11-3),
                          starch, and
                          glycerol (CAS No.
                          56-81-5)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3913.90.50)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing WorldWide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Marvin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

/S/ JAMES MARVIN
-----------------------
James Marvin
Chief Financial Officer
August 16, 2004
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5355 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain theatrical lighting fixtures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. ACKERMAN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain theatrical 

lighting fixtures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN THEATRICAL LIGHTING FIXTURES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Theatrical lighting fixtures of 

aluminum (provided for in 

subheading 9405.40.60) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5355 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
HomeNewsCaribbean Mapping Expedition

# #ScienceAtSea

# Too Many Lionfish!

A large group of invasive lionfish near St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, filmed during a Caribbean coral reef mapping expedition in April, 2015. During the 2015 Caribbean mapping expedition, 135 lionfish were spotted during a total of 26 dives. Lionfish were spotted as deep as 768 feet.                    Learn more about this mission.

### Transcript:

Lionfish may be beautiful creatures, but these fish shouldn't be in Atlantic waters. Researchers spotted this group of lionfish off the coast of St. Thomas in the U.S. Virgin Islands during a Remotely Operated Vehicle dive on April 4, 2015. Learn more about invasive lionfish.

Learn More About This Mission

###### More **Information**

          - ** Flickr Images
          - Why are lionfish a growing problem in the Atlantic Ocean?
          - What is a turkeyfish?
          - National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
          - NCCOS Ocean Science Blog
          - Coral Reef Conservation Program 

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
STATE of North Carolina v. Harry WOOD.

No. 165P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Constance Widenhouse, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Harry Wood.

Teresa H. Pell, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of March 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
STATE v. DUNSTON.

No. COA05-391.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Wale (03CRS76832, 03CRS76833, 03CRS76834).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part; Vacate the conspiracy to deliver cocaine conviction and remand.
Lavern R. IRWIN v. Juanita H. BAKER, Jewyl E. Dunn, Charles Mann, Sr.

No. 585P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 25, 2005.

Lavern Irwin, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Baker, Dunn & Mann.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Plaintiff on the 17th day of November 2004 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 25th day of January 2005."
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
     (AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Charles R. Eitel, as Chief Executive Officer of Simmons Company (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:

            (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
      ended April 1, 2006 (the "Report"), being filed with the U.S. Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and

            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Date: May 8, 2006                      /s/ Charles R. Eitel
                                       -------------------------------
                                       Name:  Charles R. Eitel
                                       Title:  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Simmons Company and will be retained by Simmons Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       39
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markm an

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis,

Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 3, 2010

d1103 

# Order

November 3, 2010

141996 & (36)

In re PEOPLE v LARRY KING.

_________________________________________

ERIC L. VANDUSSEN, SC: 141996

Appellant. COA: 294682

Shiawassee CC: 09

- 008600

- FH

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED.

The application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented

should be review ed by this Court.
LaBRIE v. CORNING, INC.

No. COA05-130.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #604989).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5288 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5288

          To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bis(4-
                        fluorophenyl)methanone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

 Mr. Ferguson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bis(4-
                        fluorophenyl)methanone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIS(4-FLUOROPHENYL)METHANONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.32.85 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Bis(4-
fluorophenyl)methanone) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. Jaamall D. OGLESBY.

No. 683P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 12, 2005.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Chapel Hill, for Jaamall D. Oglesby.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of December 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of December 2005."
48350 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 151 / Monday, August 8, 2022 / UA: Reg Flex Agenda 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

5 CFR Ch. I 

Regulatory Agenda 

AGENCY: Office of Personnel 

Management. 

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda. 

SUMMARY: The following Office of 

Personnel Management (OPM) 

regulations are scheduled for 

development or review during the 6- 

month period following publication. 

This agenda carries out OPM’s 

responsibilities to publish a semiannual 

agenda under Executive Order 12866, 

‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ and 

the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 

chapter 6). This publication does not 

impose a binding obligation on OPM 

with regard to any specific item on the 

agenda. Regulatory action in addition to 

the items listed is not precluded. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steve Hickman, (202) 606–1000. 

Stephen Hickman, 

Federal Register Liaison. 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT—FINAL RULE STAGE

Sequence No. Title Regulation 

Identifier No. 

219 .................... Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part II ............................................................................................ 3206–AO29 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT (OPM) 

Final Rule Stage 

219. Requirements Related to Surprise 

Billing; Part II [3206–AO29] 

Legal Authority: Pub. L. 116–260, 

Division BB, title I and title II 

Abstract: This final rule implements 

provisions related to the independent 

dispute resolution processes included in 

the Public Health Service Act sections 

2799A–1(c) and 2799A–2(b), as added 

by sections 102(d), 103 and 105 of the 

No Surprises Act. 

Timetable: 

Action Date FR Cite 

Interim Final Rule 10/07/21 86 FR 55980 

Interim Final Rule 

Effective.

10/07/21 

Interim Final Rule 

Comment Period End.

12/06/21 

Final Action ......... 06/00/22 

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 

Required: Yes. 

Agency Contact: Padma Babubhai 

Shah, Senior Policy Analyst, Office of 

Personnel Management, 1900 E Street 

NW, Washington, DC 20415, Phone: 202 

606–4056, Email: padma.shah@

opm.gov. 

RIN: 3206–AO29 

[FR Doc. 2022–14614 Filed 8–5–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3280–F5–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS4
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         Listed below, as of January 2, 1997, are the significant subsidiaries
of the Company and their jurisdictions of organization. All of such subsidiaries
are either directly or indirectly wholly owned by the Company. Other
subsidiaries of the Company have been omitted because, considered in the
aggregate, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

                                         Jurisdiction of
 Name of Subsidiary                        Organization
 ------------------                      ----------------

100% Owned
----------

CUNO Europe S.A.                         France
CUNO Pacific, Pty. Ltd.                  Australia
CUNO Filtration Asia Pte. Ltd.           Singapore
CUNO K.K.                                Japan
CUNO Latina Ltda                         Brazil
CUNO SarL                                Italy
CUNO GmbH                                Germany
CUNO Ltd.                                United Kingdom
HUNT v. APAC CAROLINA, INC./ASHLAND, INC.

No. COA05-512.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed February 21, 2006.

Certification Date March 13, 2006.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #305628).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION





I, Ronald E. Baron, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):







---

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  November 10, 2005



/s/ Ronald E. Baron



Ronald E. Baron

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. William Jasper GOODMAN, Jr.

No. 495P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Don Willey, for William Jasper Goodman, Jr.

Patricia A. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Michael K. Lands, District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of September 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
28 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

United Launch Alliance $1.3 B

Raytheon $556.9 M

Lockheed Martin $513.8 M

Bechtel Group $444.1 M

Ball Corp. $265.8 M

Jacobs Engineering Group $232.6 M

Harris Corp. $184.2 M

Northrop Grumman $91.0 M

Intelligent Software Solutions $87.2 M

CACI $83.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

COLORADO

#18 #19 2.0% $1,719 #19 #12 #10

$9.8 B SPENT

IN STATE

2.6% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $6.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

60,221 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

60,221

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

El Paso 31,696 8,647 916 4,499 45,758

Arapahoe 2,589 1,491 2,427 1,565 8,072

Denver 210 266 466 574 1,516

Adams ND 64 295 863

Weld ND 113 595 171

Jefferson 52 279 ND 437

Pueblo 17 441 125 ND

Boulder 70 56 66 ND

Mesa 16 25 107 ND

Larimer 23 ND 108 ND

Construction: 4%

Research and 

Development: 21%

Service: 60%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 15%

Active Duty: 58%

Civilian: 19%

National 

Guard: 9%

Reserve: 14%

21%

6%

61%

12%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

62%

4%

32%

2%

$6.2 $6.6

$4.5

$5.9

$5.0 $5.7

$6.4 $6.3

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 29

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Larimer

Boulder

Adams

Jefferson

Denver

Arapahoe

Mesa Douglas

El Paso

Pueblo

COLORADO FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

El Paso

Arapahoe

Pueblo

Jefferson

Douglas

Boulder

Denver

Adams

Larimer

Mesa

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.6 B

$2.0 B

$478.5 M

$410.4 M

$298.9 M

$278.1 M

$106.9 M

$63.7 M

$54.9 M

$42.1 M

Larimer Weld

Boulder

Adams

Arapahoe

Mesa

El Paso

Pueblo

El Paso

Arapahoe

Denver

Jefferson

Adams

Pueblo

Weld

Boulder

Larimer

Mesa

$2.8 B

$402.1 M

$56.0 M

$38.2 M

$35.0 M

$32.9 M

$21.0 M

$10.9 M

$5.2 M

$3.7 M

Jefferson

Denver