alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
72 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Enterprise Services $77.8 M

Northrop Grumman $51.5 M

Sterling Computers $28.0 M

McCallie Associates $26.6 M

National Strategic Research Institute $23.8 M

Red River Computer Company $19.9 M

BAE Systems $18.0 M

Client/Server Software Solutions Inc. $15.5 M

Strategic Professional Resources Inc. $14.9 M

Raytheon $14.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NEBRASKA

#41 #34 0.3% $790 #42 #37 #34

$1.5 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

16,634 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$889.8 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

16,634

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Sarpy 6,120 2,600 81 624 9,425

Lancaster 36 505 2,096 241 2,878

Douglas 90 899 333 639 1,961

Saunders ND 29 476 ND

Hall ND 33 255 ND

Adams ND 22 173 33

Dodge ND ND ND 206

Buffalo ND ND 133 56

Platte ND ND 120 51

Madison ND 12 92 26

Construction: 3% Research and

Development: 8%

Service: 73%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 17%

Active Duty: 38%

Civilian: 25%

National 

Guard: 25%

Reserve: 12%

6%

2%

86%

7%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

36%

6%

58%

1%

$0.7

$0.3

$0.9

$0.6 $0.7

$0.6 $0.7 $0.6

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 73

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Thurston

Madison

Cheyenne

Douglas

Sarpy

Lancaster

Hall

Adams Kearney

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEBRASKA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Sarpy

Douglas

Madison

Lancaster

Saunders

Cheyenne

Kearney

Thurston

Adams

Hall

(M = millions)

$506.8 M

$55.1 M

$23.6 M

$22.2 M

$4.2 M

$4.0 M

$2.7 M

$2.6 M

$2.3 M

$2.3 M

Sarpy

Douglas

Lancaster

Saunders

Hall

Buffalo

Cedar

Adams

Dodge

Platte

$649.2 M

$99.8 M

$89.8 M

$12.8 M

$7.8 M

$5.8 M

$4.2 M

$3.9 M

$3.6 M

$2.6 M

Cedar

Dodge

Platte

Saunders

Douglas

Buffalo Hall Sarpy

Adams

Lancaster

Saunders
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, David G. Nance, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment
No. 2 on Form 10-K/A of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. Date:
May 14, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ David G. NanceName:
    
    David G. NanceTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
 I, James W. Albrecht, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Amendment No. 2 on Form 10-K/A of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. Date: May 14, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ James W. Albrecht, Jr.Name:
    
    James W. Albrecht, Jr.Title:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Eugene A. MORGAN.

No. 152P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

Eugene A. Morgan, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 16th day of March 2005 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Guilford County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 6th day of April 2005."
STATE v. Gofery Larin HANKINS.

No. 701P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 27, 2005.

Michelle F. Lynch, for Gofery Larin Hankins.

*220Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of December 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of December 2005."
The Unique Role of the 

U.S. Office of Special Counsel

in Protecting the Rights of 

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Employees in the Federal Workplace

Addressing Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination
        - Complaints of discrimination (including harassment) based on sexual orientation or gender identity may be made to all of the following:
        - Your supervisor or manager;
        - The Agency’s Equal Employment Opportunity Office; and 
        - The U.S. Office of Special Counsel.

*

U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC)
        - OSC is an independent federal investigative and prosecutorial agency charged with safeguarding the merit system by protecting federal employees and applicants from prohibited personnel practices (PPPs).
        - OSC receives about 3,000 PPP complaints from federal workers each year, of which a small fraction deal with discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

*

PPP Complaints of Sexual Orientationor Gender Identity Discrimination
        - Federal employees and applicants may file PPP complaints of discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity under two separate provisions:  
        - Discrimination based on ... sex.  5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(1).
        - Discrimination based on conduct that does not adversely affect job performance.  5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(10).

*

PPP Complaints of Sexual Orientationor Gender Identity Discrimination
        - Features of OSC’s PPP Complaint Process
        - OSC has authority to investigate and prosecute PPP complaints;
        - OSC can seek stays of personnel actions against complainants while investigations are pending;
        - OSC can obtain full corrective action for complainants;
        - OSC can seek disciplinary action against alleged wrongdoers; and
        - No statute of limitations to file complaints with OSC.
        - To file a PPP complaint with OSC, or raise questions or concerns about the PPP process, please call (800) 872-9855 or visit OSC’s website at  www.osc.gov . 

*

PPP Complaints of Sexual Orientationor Gender Identity Discrimination
        - Depending on the circumstances, you also may seek assistance with your PPP complaint from one of the following:
        - Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB);
        - Agency’s Grievance Procedures; or
        - Union’s Negotiated Grievance Procedure.
        - You should review the rules and procedures specific to MSPB and your Agency and/or Union before you decide whether and how to proceed with your PPP complaint.

*
BROOKS v. CAPSTAR CORPORATION.

No. 110A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 20, 2005.

John Morris, Michelle Sain Langdon, Roberta S. Sperry, Charlotte, for Capstar Corporation, et al.

Vernon Sumwalt, Bob Bollinger, Charlotte, for NC Academy of Trial Lawyers.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of May 2005 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Patricia Brooks) shall have up to and including the 25th day of June 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 20th day of May 2005."
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5489 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 6892 Main Street in Gloucester, Virginia, as 

the ‘‘Congresswoman Jo Ann S. Davis Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5489 EH

1 SECTION 1. CONGRESSWOMAN JO ANN S. DAVIS POST OF2 FICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 6892 Main Street in Gloucester, 

5 Virginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Congress6 woman Jo Ann S. Davis Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Congresswoman Jo 

11 Ann S. Davis Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 9, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5489 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostAnn S. Davis Post Office’’. Gloucester, Virginia, as the ‘‘Congresswoman Jo al Service located at 6892 Main Street in
STATE v. Vernelle L. BULLOCK, Sr.

No. 445P02-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 3, 2005.

Daniel R. Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Vernelle Lafarris Bullock, Sr.

R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of August 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of August 2005."
KILIAN v. KILIAN.

No. COA04-413.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Davidson (01CVD1473).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
TRADING TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Petitioner v. IBG LLC, et al.

No. 19-353

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
*Pursuant to 5th Cir. R 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

Nos. 97-31039 & 97-31309

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

ex relator, Michael Sampson, Sr.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

LOUIS R. KOERNER, JR., Movant-Appellant

versus

CRESCENT CITY EMERGENCY MEDICAL

SERVICE, INC. doing business as MEDIC ONE;

MEDIC ONE AMBULANCE SERVICES, INC.; AMERICAN

MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC.; JERRY VARANAY; SUE

BIROU; BONNIE EDWARDS,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-3505-A

 

September 18, 1998

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, AND DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

This is round three in attorney Louis R. Koerner, Jr.’s

crusade to win a qui tam action arising out of the same set of

facts. Koerner lost the first two rounds. See Federal Recovery

Services, Inc. v. United States [Koerner I], 72 F.3d 447 (5th Cir.
2

1995); United States v. Crescent City E.M.S., No. 96-31126, slip

op. at 1-2 (5th Cir. Aug. 19, 1997) (unpublished opinion). The

complaint in this round is virtually identical to that dismissed in

rounds one and two. The district court accordingly dismissed the

round three complaint and imposed sanctions. See United States v.

Crescent City E.M.S., No. 96-CV-3505-A (E.D. La. Sept. 12, 1997).

The district court’s reasoning is sound. We therefore AFFIRM the

district court’s dismissal of Sampson’s and Koerner’s claims, as

well as the court’s award of sanctions.

This appeal is similarly frivolous and it is therefore

DISMISSED. See 5th Circuit R. 42.2. At the end of the previous

round, we cautioned Koerner that “any future frivolous appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions.” Koerner II, slip op. at 2. We meant what we said. We

now impose sanctions of double costs and attorney’s fees incurred

in defending this appeal on Koerner. See Coghlan v. Starkey, 852

F.2d 806, 812-13 (5th Cir. 1988). 

DISMISSED and REMANDED FOR DETERMINATION OF COSTS AND

ATTORNEYS’ FEES.
Earl G. BROWN; Emma L. Brown; Richard B. Evans; Peggy F. Evans; Catherine Ann Evans; Richard Tim Evans; Clarence Farrell; Kathyrn Farrell; Robert Powell, Sr.; Ruth Maxine Powell; Lattice Curl, and wife Evelyn Curl; Lewis Boger and wife Kathy Boger, Plaintiffs v. AMERICAN MULTIMEDIA, INC.; Ami; A.M.I., Inc.; American Media International, LCC; American Media International, Ltd.; Burlington Property, LLC; Bill and Peggy Britt Limited Partnership; David J. Forsyth; Billy B. Britt; Peggy G. Britt; and Jerry C. Jones, Jr., Defendants. American Multimedia, Inc.; American Media International, LLC; Burlington Property, LLC; Bill and Peggy Britt Limited Partnership; David J. Forsyth; Billy B. Britt; Peggy G. Britt; Jerry C. Jones, Jr.; Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Heritage Casket Company, Inc.; Marsellus Casket Company, Inc.; Service Corporation International, Third-Party Defendants.

No. 357P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Robert J. King, III, Greensboro, Katherine A. Murphy, Alexander Elkan, for American Multimedia, et al.

Tracy E. Tomlin, Charlotte, for Heritage Casket Co., et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of July 2005 by Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
1

Eric H. Holder, Jr., has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the

United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 43(c).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1195

___________

Filiberto Degante, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review of

v. * an Order of the Board

* of Immigration Appeals.

Eric H. Holder, Jr.,1

 Attorney General *

of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Respondent. *

___________

Submitted: June 2, 2009

Filed: June 8, 2009

___________

Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Filiberto Degante, a native of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that summarily affirmed an immigration judge’s

(IJ’s) denial of his application for cancellation of removal. We lack jurisdiction to

review the IJ’s determination that Degante failed to show the requisite exceptional and

extremely unusual hardship that his removal would cause his United-States-citizen
-2-

children. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b) (cancellation-of-removal eligibility requirements

for nonpermanent residents); 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) (no court shall have

jurisdiction to review any judgment regarding denial of relief under, inter alia,

§ 1229b); Zacarias-Velasquez v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 429, 434 (8th Cir. 2007)

(whether alien meets exceptional-and-extremely-unusual-hardship threshold “‘is

precisely the discretionary determination that Congress shielded from our review’”

under § 1252(a)(2)(B) (quoting Meraz-Reyes v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 842, 843 (8th Cir.

2006) (per curiam))).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.

______________________________
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration  Statement No.
333-21141  of Carson,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report  dated March 7, 1997 (June
30, 1997 as to Note 15) (which expresses an unqualified  opinion and includes an
explanatory  paragraph  relating  to  the  Company's  change  in its  method  of
accounting  for  inventories  and the  related  retroactive  restatement  of the
consolidated  financial  statements),  appearing  in this Annual  Report on Form
10-K/A of Carson,  Inc. for the transition period from April 1, 1996 to December
31, 1996.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

October 7, 1997
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 
| I, Brian F. Lavin, President and Chief Executive  Officer of NTS Realty Capital, Inc., the managing general partner of NTS  Realty Holdings Limited Partnership (the “Company”), certify pursuant to 18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that: |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | 1. |   | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the  Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 amended; and |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                | 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 

 

 
| Dated: | August 11, 2008                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | */s/ Brian F. Lavin*                                |   |
|   | Brian F. Lavin                                      |
| Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer of            |
|   | NTS Realty Capital, Inc., the Managing General |
|   | Partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership  |

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5396 

To designate the Cold War Museum in Fairfax, Virginia, as the National 

Cold War Museum. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To designate the Cold War Museum in Fairfax, Virginia, 

as the National Cold War Museum. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL COLD WAR MUSEUM. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Cold War Museum in Fair5 fax, Virginia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Na6 tional Cold War Museum’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the museum referred to in subsection (a) shall 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5396 IH

1 be deemed to be a reference to the National Cold War 

2 Museum. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# ***Exhibit 32.2***

# * *

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Advanced Accessory Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald J. Gardhouse,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 
|     /s/  Ronald J. Gardhouse |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Ronald J. Gardhouse                              |
| Chief Financial Officer                          |
| (Principal Financial Officer)                    |
| May 12, 2004                                     |

 

19

----