alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              23
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,786
<ALLOWANCES>                                        76
<INVENTORY>                                        921
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,015
<PP&E>                                           1,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                     602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,105
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,456
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,086)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,513
<SALES>                                          7,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,154
<CGS>                                            4,395
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,395
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,009
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (591)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,841)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,841)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (4,226)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (253)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,320)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.71)


</TABLE>
STATE v. SAVARIA.

No. COA04-1353.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 5, 2005.

Certification Date July 25, 2005.

Appeal from the Buncombe (03CRS16441).

Case without published opinion. Reversed.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Global Green Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, Arnold Hughes, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                    
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated this 15thday of April, 2011.

| | A.R. Hughes                           
| | --------------------------------------
| | Arnold Hughes, Chief Financial Officer

---
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

 

(1)          this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gander Mountain Company.

 
| Dated: December 9, 2005 |
|------------------------------|
|                         |
|                         | /s/ Mark R. Baker |   |
|                         | Mark R. Baker |
|                         | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
|                         | /s/ Dennis M. Lindahl |   |
|                         | Dennis M. Lindahl |
|                         | *Executive Vice President,* |
|                         | *Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer* |
|                              |  |  |  |

 

1

----
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 24.2


                              CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION


    I, Clifford N. Hair, Jr., Secretary of Costilla Energy, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation, do hereby certify that the Board of Directors of Costilla Energy, 
Inc., duly adopted the following resolutions on March 17, 1997.

    RESOLVED, that the directors and officers of the Company are hereby
authorized and directed to execute and deliver a Power of Attorney to Cadell S.
Liedtke, Michael J. Grella and Bobby W. Page in the following form:

    "KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, the undersigned, being certain of the
Officers and all of the Directors of Costilla Energy, Inc. (the "Company"), a
Delaware Corporation, do hereby constitute and appoint Cadell S. Liedtke,
Michael J. Grella and Bobby W. Page, or any one of them, with full power of
substitution, our true and lawful attorneys and agents, to do any and all acts
and things in our names in the capacities indicated which Cadell S. Liedtke,
Michael J. Grella and Bobby W. Page, or any one of them, may deem necessary or
advisable to enable the Company to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities
and Exchange Commission in connection with the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, including specifically, but not
limited to, the power and authority to sign such Form 10-K, any and all
amendments thereto and any other forms or documents related to such Form 10-K
which are required under federal securities laws for us, or any of us, in our
names in the capacities indicated; and we do hereby ratify and confirm all that
Cadell S. Liedtke, Michael J. Grella and Bobby W. Page, or any one of them,
shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.  This Power of Attorney may be
signed in any number of counterparts, and each such counterpart shall be
considered an original hereof."; and

    That the officers of the Company are hereby authorized and directed to take
all such further action as they may deem advisable in order to carry out the
intent and purposes of the foregoing resolution.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand on behalf of this
corporation this 17th day of March, 1997.


                                         /s/ Clifford N. Hair, Jr.
                                   -------------------------------------------
                                   Clifford N. Hair, Jr.,  Secretary
STATE of North Carolina v. Antonia Demetrius GILBERT.

No. 425P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Kathryn L. VandenBerg, Raleigh, for Antonia D. Gilbert.

Thomas J. Pitman, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of August 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
GOUGH v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BD. OF EXAMINERS OF PLUMBING, HEATING AND FIRE SPRINKLER CONTRACTORS

No. COA04-926

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Yadkin (03CVS75).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A1 71 5 . RACQUEL GREEN et a l

. v . MAI N STREET RENEW AL, LLC.

Th i s cas e b eg an as a d is p o s s es s o ry p ro ceed i n g i n m ag is t rat e co urt

. Fo l l o wi n g

an ad v ers e ru l in g , Racq u el G reen an d Li n d a G reen (co l l ect i v el y , t h e “ Defen d an t s ”)

ap p eal ed t o t h e s u peri o r co u rt , w h i ch affi rm ed t h e i s s uan ce o f a wri t o f p os s es s i o n in
fav o r o f M ai n St reet Ren ewal
, L LC (t h e “ Pl ai n t i ff”). Th e s u p eri o r co u rt fu rt her s t at ed

t h at i f t he Defen d an t s p u rs u ed an ap p eal
, t h ey wo u l d b e req u i red t o p ay $ 2 0 ,0 4 2 .8 5
i n t o t h e co u rt ’ s r e g i s try

an d an ad d i ti o nal $1 ,1 9 5 .0 0 per m o n t h d u e o n t h e fi rs t d ay

o f each m o n t h

. Th e Defen d an t s fi l ed a n ot i ce o f ap p eal to t h i s Co u rt , wh i c h w e d i s m i s s ed d u e t o t h ei r fai l ure t o fo l l o w th e d i s cret i o n ary ap p eal pro ced u re. See Cas e No . A1 9 A1 3 5 8 (d i s m i ss ed Feb . 2 1 , 2 0 1 9 ).
Aft er t h e Defen dan t s fai l ed t o p ay t h e req u ired fu n d s i n to t he co u rt reg i s t ry as

o u t l i ned i n t h e s u peri o r co u rt ’ s o rd er, t h e Pl ai n t i ff m o v ed t o d i s m i s s t he ap p eal an d
fo r t h e wri t o f p o s s es s i o n t o i s s u e i n s t an t er. O n Feb ru ary 2 2
, 2 0 19
, t h e s u p eri o r co u rt

or de r ed t h at th e wri t o f p o ss es s i o n b e g ran t ed effect i v e i ns t an ter. Th e Defen d an t s t h e n fi led th e i n s t an t d irect ap p eal . W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct io n

. As we prev i o u s l y ex p l ai ned in o u r Feb ru ary 2 1, 2 0 19 d i s m i ss al o rd er, b ecau s e

t h e o rd er at is s u e d i s p o s es o f a d e n o v o ap p eal fro m a m ag i st rat e co u rt deci s i o n , t h e Defen d an t s were req u i red t o fo l l o w t h e d i scret i o nary ap p eal p ro ced ures t o o b t ai n

r e v i e w b efo re t hi s Co urt

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (1 1); S t r a ch a n v. Mer i t o r Mt g

. Co r p

. Ea s t , 2 1 6 Ga. A p p

. 8 2
, 8 2 (4 5 3 SE2 d 1 19 ) (1 9 9 5 ). T h ei r fai l ure t o d o s o d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d ict i o n o v er t h i s ap p eal

. April 11, 2019Acco rd i ng l y , t h e Defen d an t s’ ap peal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/11/2019
STATE v. LUTTERLOAH

No. COA04-1471

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from New Hanover (01CRS13586).

Case without published opinion. No error.
# L_2016062EN.01001701.xml

| 9.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 62/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 62/17

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2016/334

of 4 March 2016

appointing two alternate members, proposed by the Republic of Lithuania, of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Lithuanian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | Two alternate members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Ms Odeta ŽERLAUSKIENĖ and Mr Jonas PINSKUS, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two alternate members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of Ms Odeta ŽERLAUSKIENĖ and Mr Jonas PINSKUS,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed as alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Ms Andžela ŠAKINIENĖ, Member of Klaipėda District Municipal Council, |
| --- | --- |

—

Ms Andžela ŠAKINIENĖ, Member of Klaipėda District Municipal Council,

| — | Mr Kęstutis VAITUKAITIS, Member of Elektrėnai Municipal Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Kęstutis VAITUKAITIS, Member of Elektrėnai Municipal Council.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 4 March 2016.

For the Council

The President

S.A.M. DIJKSMA

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

---
# L_2012071EN.01001001.xml

| 9.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 71/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 71/10

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 194/2012

of 8 March 2012

fixing the amount of private storage aid for certain fishery products in the 2012 fishing year

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2813/2000 of 21 December 2000 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 as regards the grant of private storage aid for certain fishery products (2), and in particular Article 1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Private storage aid should not exceed the sum of technical and financial costs recorded in the Union during the fishing year preceding the year in question. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Private storage aid should not exceed the sum of technical and financial costs recorded in the Union during the fishing year preceding the year in question.

| (2) | To discourage long-term storage, to shorten payment times and to reduce the burden of controls, private storage aid should be paid in one single instalment. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

To discourage long-term storage, to shorten payment times and to reduce the burden of controls, private storage aid should be paid in one single instalment.

| (3) | In order not to hinder the operation of the intervention system in the year 2012, this Regulation should apply retroactively from 1 January 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In order not to hinder the operation of the intervention system in the year 2012, this Regulation should apply retroactively from 1 January 2012.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Management Committee for Fishery Products, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Management Committee for Fishery Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2012 fishing year the amount of private storage aid, referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, for the products listed in Annex II to that Regulation shall be as follows:

| — | first month | : | EUR 219 per tonne, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| — | second month | : | EUR 0 per tonne. |

—

first month

:

EUR 219 per tonne,

—

second month

:

EUR 0 per tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2012.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 8 March 2012.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 326, 22.12.2000, p. 30.

2

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5226 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Butane, 1-chloro. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2008 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Butane, 1-chloro. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BUTANE, 1-CHLORO. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Butane, 1-chloro (CAS No. 

109–69–3) (provided for in 

subheading 2903.19.60) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5226 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PROGRESSIVE WEST INSURANCE

COMPANY,

 Plaintiff-counter-defendant -

Appellant,

 v.

CRAIG TISCARENO; TERESA

TISCARENO,

 Defendants-counter-claimants

- Appellees.

No. 11-57033

D.C. No. 3:08-cv-00180-H-CAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Marilyn L. Huff, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 9, 2013** 

Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON, TALLMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

FILED

APR 11 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Progressive West Insurance Company (“Progressive”) appeals from a final

judgment entered by the district court in favor of Craig Tiscareno and Teresa

Tiscareno. The district court entered judgment after a jury found, in a special

verdict, that Progressive had unreasonably failed to accept the Tiscarenos’

settlement demand. Progressive contends that the district court erred in denying its

pre-verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law, and argues that the jury’s

verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the district court’s judgment.

“[A] post-verdict motion under [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 50(b) is an

absolute prerequisite to any appeal based on insufficiency of the evidence.” Nitco

Holding Corp. v. Boujikian, 491 F.3d 1086, 1089 (9th Cir.2007); see also

Unitherm Food Sys., Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., 546 U.S. 394, 400–01 (2006). 

Because Progressive failed to file a post-verdict Rule 50(b) motion, Progressive

has forfeited its right to challenge the jury’s verdict based on sufficiency of the

evidence. In the absence of a Rule 50(b) motion, an “appellate court [i]s without

power to direct the District Court to enter judgment contrary to the one it had

permitted to stand.” Cone v. W. Virginia Pulp & Paper Co., 330 U.S. 212, 218

(1947). As a result, we are precluded from granting the relief sought by

Progressive, entrance of judgment notwithstanding the verdict. 
3

Even if we were to consider the merits of Progressive’s arguments on

appeal, we would conclude that the district court’s judgment was not erroneous as

a matter of law and the jury’s verdict was supported by sufficient evidence. There

was a legally sufficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable jury to find that

Progressive “unreasonably fail[ed] to accept a reasonable settlement demand for an

amount within the policy limits between April 16, 2007 and May 18, 2007.” 

Judgment, Progressive West Ins. Co. v. Tiscareno, No. 3:08–cv–00180–H–CAB,

Dkt. No. 138 (S. D. Cal. Oct. 26, 2011); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(a); see also Bell v.

Clackamas Cnty., 341 F.3d 858, 865 (9th Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED.
JACK H. WINSLOW FARMS, INC. v. T. Carl DEDMON, et als.

No. 466P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

H. Lawrence Armstrong, Jr., Enfield, for Jack H. Winslow Farms, Inc.

David E. Fox, Durham, Jeffrey A. Eyres, Frederick W. Morris, Minneapolis, MN, for A.O. Smith Corporation.

David L. Brown, Bryan G. Scott, Greensboro, for T. Carl Dedmon.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of August 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
EXHIBIT
32.2 CFO CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing Worldwide, Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James Davis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ James DavisJames
      DavisChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      26, 2010
STATE v. ROWE.

No. COA05-566.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Carteret (04CRS50432, 04CRS50433, 04CRS50434).

Case without published opinion. No error in pat, reversed and remanded for a new trial on the charge of attemped felonious breaking or entering.