alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 131 (Monday, July 11, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41060-41061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14695]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2022-0506]


Safety Zone; Four Seasons Hotel Fireworks Display Event, New 
Orleans, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notification of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce a temporary safety zone for a 
fireworks display located on the navigable waters of the Lower 
Mississippi River (LMR) between Mile Marker (MM) 94.5 and MM 95.5 Above 
Head of Passes (AHP). This action is needed to provide for the safety 
of life on these navigable waterways during the event. During the 
enforcement periods, the operator of any vessel in the regulated area 
must comply with directions from the Captain of the Port or designated 
representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.845 will be enforced from 8:30 
p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 21, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
notification of enforcement, call or email Lieutenant Commander William 
Stewart, Sector New Orleans, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 504-365-2246, 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1047797c7c79717d3e513e4364756771626450656373773e7d797c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="386f5154545159551679166b4c5d4f594a4c784d4b5b5f16555154">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce safety zone 
located in 33 CFR 165.845 for the Four Seasons Hotel Fireworks Display 
event. The regulations will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. through 10 p.m. 
on July 21, 2022. This action is being taken to provide for the safety 
of life on navigable waterways during this event, which will be located 
between MM 94.5 and MM 95.5 AHP, LMR, LA. During the enforcement 
periods, the operator of any vessel in the regulated area must comply 
with directions from the Captain of the Port or designated 
representative.
    In addition to this notification of enforcement in the Federal 
Register, the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this 
enforcement period via Marine Safety Information Bulletins (MSIBs), 
Local Notice to Mariners (LNMs), and/or Broadcast Notice to Mariners 
(BNMs).


[[Page 41061]]


    Dated: July 5, 2022.
K.K. Denning,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector New Orleans.
[FR Doc. 2022-14695 Filed 7-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Order entered November 16, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00446 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 00447 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 00448 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 00449 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 00450 - CR No. 05 - 15 - 00451 - CR ROGER LADALE FORD, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s. F 14 - 55016 - U , F14 - 55017 - U, F14 - 55018 - U,

F14 - 55019 - U, F14 - 55020 - U, F14 - 55021 - U



### O RDER Before the Court is the State of Texas’s second motion to e xtend the time for filing its brief, which accompanied the State’s second motion. We GRANT the motion, deem the brief timely filed, and DIRECT the Clerk to file the State’ s brief as of November 13, 2015.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS PRESIDING JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350
                   (SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of, Comlink Communications Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Bell, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 12, 2005

By:  /s/ James Bell
     -----------------------------------------------
     James Bell, President, Chief Executive Officer,
     Chief Financial Officer and Director
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1522

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. KENNETH P.

BROOKS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION; LOCKHEED MARTIN

ENERGY SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; LOCKHEED MARTIN

UTILITY SERVICES, INCORPORATED,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge.

(8:00-cv-01088-BEL)

Submitted: October 27, 2006 Decided: February 23, 2007

Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Kenneth P. Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn V. Whitaker, VORYS,

SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
*

Brooks was represented by counsel in district court but is

pursuing his appeal pro se.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth P. Brooks, a pro se litigant, appeals from the

district court’s order dismissing his False Claims Act complaint.

Lockheed Martin has moved to dismiss the appeal, arguing that

Brooks cannot pursue his action pro se.* We grant the motion in

part and dismiss the qui tam claims. We affirm the district

court’s dismissal of Brooks’ retaliation claim.

A lay person may not bring a qui tam action under the

False Claims Act. See United States ex rel. Lu v. Ou, 368 F.3d

773, 775-76 (7th Cir. 2004). Although a qui tam relator is

entitled by statute to a share of the recovery if his action is

successful, see 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d) (2000), the United States is

the real party in interest, and the need for adequate legal

representation on behalf of the United States counsels against

permitting pro se suits. See United States ex rel. Milam v. Univ.

of Tex., 961 F.2d 46, 50 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we grant

Lockheed Martin’s motion in part and dismiss Brooks’ qui tam

claims.

With regard to Brooks’ claim of retaliatory discharge

under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h) (2000), such a claim may be brought pro

se, because it is not a claim on behalf of the Government.

However, our review of the record shows that this claim was
- 3 -

untimely filed. Thus, we affirm the dismissal of this claim for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States ex rel.

Brooks v. Lockheed Martin Corp., No. 8:00-cv-01088-BEL (D. Md.

Mar. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART;

AFFIRMED IN PART
In the Matters of As.L.G. and Au.R.G., Minor Children.

No. 624PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Charlotte Gail Blake, Boone, for Brenda Fausnet.

Paul Freeman, Wilkesboro, for Wilkes County DSS.

Sherrie R. Hodges, Jefferson, for Guardian ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of November 2005 by Respondent (Mother) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
STATE AUTO. MUT. INS. CO. v. IADANZA

No. COA04-1230

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed May 17, 2005

Certification Date June 6, 2005

Appeal from Wake (03CVS11796).

Case reported without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2
                                  CERTIFICATION

            Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002

I, Carol Russell, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Beverage
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the
registrant and I have:

         a) designed such internal controls to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") is
made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's internal controls as
of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and

         c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

         a) all significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.

Date:  March 30, 2007                             /s/Carol Russell
                                                     ----------------
                                                     Carol Russell
                                                     Treasurer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5233 

To extend for two years the exemption of returning workers from the 

numerical limitations for H–2B temporary workers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2008 

Mrs. DRAKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To extend for two years the exemption of returning workers 

from the numerical limitations for H–2B temporary workers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Giving Relief to Our 

5 Small Businesses Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF RETURNING WORKER EXEMPTION 

7 TO H–2B NUMERICAL LIMITATION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 214(g)(9)(A) of the Im9 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(9)(A)) 

10 is amended by striking ‘‘an alien who has already been 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5233 IH

1 counted toward the numerical limitation of paragraph 

2 (1)(B) during fiscal year 2004, 2005, or 2006 shall not 

3 again be counted toward such limitation during fiscal year 

4 2007.’’ and inserting ‘‘an alien who has already, during 

5 any 1 of the 3 preceding fiscal years, been counted toward 

6 the numerical limitation of paragraph (1)(B) shall not 

7 again be counted toward such limitation during fiscal year 

8 2008 or 2009.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall take effect as if enacted on October 

11 1, 2007. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
TRAN v. NGUYEN

No. COA05-62

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed November 1, 2005

Certification Date November 21, 2005

Appeal from Guilford (03CVS5480).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5483 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5483

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, as the ``Private 
        First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS DAVID H. SHARRETT II POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Private First Class David H. Sharrett II 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 23, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5483

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, as the ``Private 
        First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building''.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of SeaChange International, Inc. (the
Company)
on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William C. Styslinger,
III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

|(1) |  | The Companys Annual Report on
      Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) |  | The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/     WILLIAMC. STYSLINGER, III                                                                   
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|**William C. Styslinger,
      IIIChief Executive Officer,Chairman of the Board and
      Director**

April 14, 2009

This
certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission with
this Annual Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.

---
STATE v. HUFFMAN.

No. COA05-1297.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 23.2

SARAH LOBOSKY

Harry B. Sands, Lobosky & Co. 
P.O. Box N-624 
Nassau, The Bahamas



28 February 2008

Steiner Leisure Limited 
Suite 104A 
Saffrey Square 
Nassau, The Bahamas 
Ladies/Gentlemen: 
Re: Annual Report on Form 10-K 
We hereby consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Steiner Leisure Limited for the year ended December 31, 2007, under "Item 1A  -  Risk Factors - We are not a United States Company and, as a Result, there are Special Risks."

Yours faithfully,

/s/ Sarah Lobosky

HARRY B. SANDS LOBOSKY AND COMPANY
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7852

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID ANTHONY CAIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-95, CA-95-1154-3)

Submitted: January 13, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998

Before HALL, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Anthony Cain, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion

filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)). We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Cain, Nos. CR-93-95; CA-95-1154-3 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 1 &

Nov. 20, 1996). See Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568

(U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7239

JONATHAN HENSLEE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SINGLETON, Avery/Mitchell Correctional Officer,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Robert J. Conrad, 

Jr., District Judge. (1:13-cv-00090-RJC)

Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 25, 2014

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Leigh Henslee, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Grande, 

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Leigh Henslee seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying Henslee’s motion for reconsideration of 

the court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. 

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral 

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order Henslee seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny as moot 

Henslee’s motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
STATE v. PARSONS

No. COA05-94

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Iredell (03CRS50634).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



I, Tom D. Benscoter, Chief Financial Officer of Prosoft Learning Corporation (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the accompanying
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A (the Report) for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, do hereby certify that to my knowledge:



| | 1 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company in respect of those items
required to be described or presented in such Report under Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|                                        
|                                        
|/s/ TOM D. BENSCOTER                    
|Tom D. Benscoter Chief Financial Officer



Date:
November 28, 2005
IN RE J.N.C.

No. COA05-627.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed March 7, 2006.

Certification Date March 27, 2006.

Appeal from Wilkes (02J176)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(United States Code, Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350)
Accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
MarketAxess Holdings Inc. for the Quarter Ended June 30, 2010
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ RICHARD M. MCVEYRichard M. McVeyJuly 30, 2010
    Chief Executive Officer This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
 41