alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Ascent Pediatrics, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Numbers 333-31553, 333-31551 and
333-31135), of our report dated March 23, 1998, on our audits of the financial
statements of Ascent Pediatrics, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                                COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 1998
# L_2012178EN.01000401.xml

| 10.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 178/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 178/4

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 611/2012

of 9 July 2012

amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 on common rules for access to the international market for coach and bus services, and amending Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 (1), and in particular Article 4(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The colour of the Community licence model is defined as ‘Colour Pantone light blue’ in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The colour of the Community licence model is defined as ‘Colour Pantone light blue’ in Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009.

| (2) | There is a need to specify the colour more precisely in order to encourage homogeneity and uniform interpretation and application of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

There is a need to specify the colour more precisely in order to encourage homogeneity and uniform interpretation and application of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee referred to in Article 26 of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee referred to in Article 26 of Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1073/2009, in the fourth line, the sentence ‘Colour Pantone light blue, format DIN A4 cellulose paper 100 g/m2 or more’ is replaced by the following:

‘Colour Pantone light blue 290, or as close as possible to this colour, format DIN A4 cellulose paper 100 g/m2 or more’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 July 2012.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 88.

1

---
STATE v. BURKS.

No. COA05-138.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Randolph (03CRS51659, 03CRS51660, 03CRS51661, 03CRS51662, 03CRS51663, 03CRS51664).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
IN RE R.S.C.

No. COA05-418.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Alamance (03J254).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
106 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

UTAH 

#26

$6.3 B SPENT IN 

#18

2.7% OF STATE GDP

1.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,877

PER RESIDENT 

#24

$4.3 B CONTRACT 

#25

32,842 NUMBER OF 

#23

$2.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 4% Research and

Development: 32% Supplies and

Equipment: 34%

Service: 29%

By Service 

Army

15%

Navy/Marines

26%

Air Force

51%

Other Defense

8%

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 15% Active Duty: 14%

National 

Guard: 22%

Civilian: 49%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

33%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

61%

Other Defense

4%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Northrop Grumman $2.1 B

L3Harris Technologies $625.0 M

Carahsoft Technology $102.9 M

Utah State University $99.5 M

Moog $67.8 M

HHI Corp. $66.8 M

Boeing $66.0 M

Hensel Phelps Construction $59.3 M

SAIC $50.8 M

Engineering and Software System Solutions, Inc. $36.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.3

$2.4 $2.3 $1.9 $1.5 $1.6 $1.3 $1.2

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$2.0 BILLION 32,842

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Davis 4,288 13,664 ND 1,325 ND 

Salt Lake 205 1,201 4,670 2,715 8,791

Tooele 22 1,127 148 0 1,297

Utah 51 42 1,007 153 1,253

Weber 48 114 347 470 979 

Washington ND 17 306 50 ND 

Cache 11 ND 94 68 ND 

Box Elder ND 52 87 0 ND 

Sanpete 0 ND 108 0 ND 

Iron ND ND 100 0 ND 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

UTAH 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Iron

Washington

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Cache

Box Elder Weber

Summit Davis

Tooele

Wasatch Utah

Sanpete

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Salt Lake

Weber

Davis

Cache

Tooele

Utah

Box Elder

Summit

Wasatch

Sanpete

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.7 B

$1.2 B

$1.1 B

$121.9 M

$90.6 M

$73.3 M 

$57.8 M

$4.2 M

$1.9 M

$1.3 M

Davis

Salt Lake

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Washington

Cache

Box Elder

Iron

Sanpete

$1.4 B

$358.9 M

$91.0 M

$41.2 M

$32.8 M

$8.9 M 

$7.1 M

$6.5 M

$2.9 M

$2.8 M

Salt Lake

Salt Lake

Cache

Box Elder

Davis

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Sanpete

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 107

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
```

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of TS&B Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),the undersigned certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

TS&B Holdings, Inc.

/s/ Charles Giannetto
-----------------------------
    Charles Giannetto
    Chief Financial Officer

October 14, 2003
```
ETTER v. PIGG.

No. COA05-626.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Henderson (01SP287).

Case without published opinion. Reversed and Remanded.
EASTWAY WRECKER SERVICE, INC. v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE.

No. 467A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 165 N.C.App. 639, 599 S.E.2d 410 (2004), affirming an order entered on 6 January 2003 by Judge Albert Diaz in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 October 2005.

The Odom Firm, PLLC, by T. LaFontine Odom, Sr. and Thomas L. Odom, Jr., Charlotte, for plaintiff-appellant.

Office of the City Attorney, by Cynthia L. White, Senior Assistant City Attorney, and Moore & Van Allen, PLLC, by Daniel G. Clodfelter, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit
10.3


 





 


2019
Bill White Bonus Compensation Plan


 


On-target
bonus compensation for 2019 shall be 35% of salary. 75% of the on-target bonus will be a cash component based upon the percentage
of 2019 budgeted EBITDA achieved. 25% of the on-target bonus will be a discretionary award of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) from
the 2015 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended, based on the percentage completion of the targets listed in Appendix A.


 


For
the avoidance of doubt, if the on-target bonus were $75,000, and all targets are achieved, then:


 


	 	●	$56,250 would be
    the cash component
	 	●	$18,750 would be
    the value of the RSUs awarded


 


The
percentage payout for the cash component will be based on the percentage of EBITDA target achieved in the following table:


 


	 

        Budgeted

        EBITDA
        Loss
	 

        Percentage
        of

        EBITDA
        Target
	Minimum

        Additional
        EBITDA
	Percentage
                                         of

        On-Target
        Bonus Paid

	 	Less
    than 90%	 	0%
	 	90%
    - 94.99%	$
    (229,889.00)	25%
	 	95%
    - 99.99%	$
    (114,944.50)	90%
	$(2,298,890)	100%
    - 104.99%	$-	100%
	 	105%
    - 109.99%	$114,944.50	105%
	 	110%
    - 114.99%	$229,889.00	110%
	 	115%
    - 119.99%	$344,833.50	115%
	 	120%
    - 124.99%	$459,778.00	125%
	 	125%
    - 129.99%	$574,722.50	150%
	 	130%
    and Greater	$689,667.00	175%
	 	 	 	 
	 	On-Target	 	 
	 	Indicates
    EBITDA Positive in Q4 2019	 


 


All
EBITDA targets are net of the bonus expense.





 


	 	●	The EBITDA will be determined by Management as part of the 2019 year-end
                                    close with final determination to be made by the Board




	 	●	The bonus amount
    will be confirmed by the board no later than the March 2020 Board meeting, payable on the next payroll date.
	 	●	The executive team
    member must be an active employee on the date of payment in order to receive the bonus


 


	Signature	/s/
    Bill White	 	Date
    5/1/2019


 


Intellicheck,
Inc – Company Confidential





 






    	 



    	 



    

 


 


Appendix
A


Bill
White


 


	 	1.	Implement
    ContractSafe with all contracts current by end of Q3 2019
	 	2.	Reduce
    time to onboard Age ID clients by 50% by 08/31/2019
	 	3.	Billing
    process documented with development plan created to streamline and automate by end of June 2019, with implementation completed
    no later than September 31 2019


 


Intellicheck,
Inc – Company Confidential
# L_2015068EN.01009003.xml

| 13.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/90

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 200/2012 of 8 March 2012 concerning a Union target for the reduction of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium in flocks of broilers, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 71 of 9 March 2012
  )

On page 32, in recital 8 (twice) and the second subparagraph of Article 1(1), and on page 35, in the Annex, point 4.2, first subparagraph, point (c):

for:

‘1,4,[5],12:i:-’,

read:

‘
  1,4,[5],12:i:-’.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofGlobal Green Solutions Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedMay 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,J. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 15thday of July, 2008.                                                                                                                    
|   

J. DOUGLAS FRATERJ. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer





















---
# L_2017068EN.01000601.xml

| 14.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/6

---

Corrigendum to the definitive adoption (EU, Euratom) 2017/305 of Amending budget No 6 of the European Union for the financial year 2016

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 52 of 28 February 2017
  )

On pages 182 to 206, in the titles and table headers:

for:

‘2017’,

read:

‘2016’.

---
# L_2017084EN.01000601.xml

| 30.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 84/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 84/6

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2017/607

of 29 March 2017

amending Decision 2011/173/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/173/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/173/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/173/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 31 March 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/173/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 31 March 2018.

| (3) | Decision 2011/173/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2011/173/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The second paragraph of Article 6 of Decision 2011/173/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘This Decision shall apply until 31 March 2018.’.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 2017.

For the Council

The President

L. GRECH

---

(1)  Council Decision 2011/173/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 68).

1

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonio
      F. Uccello, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      19, 2007





/s/
      Antonio F. Uccello, III


Antonio
      F. Uccello, III


Chief
      Financial Officer
Ludovicus N. KEYZER, a/k/a Ludo Keyzer, Joseph Kintz, Robin Kintz, Carl W. Parker III, and Barry Nakell v. AMERLINK, LTD., Richard Spoor, Deborah N. Meyer, John Meuser, Meyer & Meuser, P.A., American Detective Services, Inc., and Kenneth J. Johnson.

No. 587A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 7, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 618 S.E.2d 768 (2005), affirming orders entered by Judge John R. Jolly, Jr. in Superior Court, Orange County on 22 September 2003, 29 January 2004, 22 March 2004, and 12 April 2004. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 March 2006.

Barry Nakell, pro se and for remaining plaintiff-appellants.

Anderson, Johnson, Lawrence, Butler & Bock, L.L.P., by Steven C. Lawrence, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellees Amerlink, Ltd. and Richard Spoor.

Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by Richard T. Boyette, Raleigh, for defendant-appellees Deborah N. Meyer, John Meuser, and Meyer & Meuser, P.A.

Nexsen Pruet Adams Kleemeier, PLLC, by Patrick D. Sarsfield, II, Charlotte, for defendant-appellees American Detective Services, Inc. and Kenneth J. Johnson.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
II 

Calendar No. 845 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5168 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 2, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

JUNE 25, 2008 

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, as the ‘‘Cody Grater Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CODY GRATER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in 

6 Brooksville, Florida, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Cody Grater Post Office Building’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5168 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Cody Grater Post 

5 Office Building’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Calendar No. 845 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5168 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostOffice Building’’. Brooksville, Florida, as the ‘‘Cody Grater Post al Service located at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in 

JUNE 25, 2008 

Reported without amendment 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
56 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

MAINE 

#32 #11 0.6% $2,626 #29 #43 #37

$3.5 B SPENT IN 5.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $2.7 B CONTRACT 12,699 NUMBER OF $0.8 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 3% Research and

Development: 1%

Service: 29%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 68%

By Service 

Army

1%

Navy/Marines

81%

Air Force

2%

Other Defense

16%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 4% Active Duty: 2% 

National 

Guard: 23%

Civilian: 71%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

20%

Navy/Marines

63%

Air Force

10%

Other Defense

6%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

General Dynamics $1.8 B

Martin's Point Health Care $375.1 M

Cianbro Cos. $179.7 M

Puritan Medical Products $48.3 M

Intermat $35.2 M

Methuen Construction $31.5 M

City of Bangor $21.8 M

Orbis Inc. $16.0 M

Asturian Group $11.5 M

Precision Partners LLC $11.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$3.2

FY13 FY17 FY19

$2.6 $2.7

$2.1

$1.7 $1.4 $1.4

FY14 FY15 FY16

$1.2

FY18 FY20

$795.3 MILLION 12,699

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Reserve Total

York ND 7,335 73 164 ND

Penobscot ND 380 1,474 152 ND

Kennebec ND 199 616 ND ND

Aroostook 0 583 99 0 682

Cumberland 24 77 363 146 610

Sagadahoc 104 334 0 ND ND

Androscoggin ND 18 97 97 ND

Washington ND 77 40 0 ND

Oxford 0 0 100 0 100

Somerset 11 ND 52 0 ND
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Sagadahoc

York

Cumberland

Piscataquis

Penobscot

Washington

Kennebec

Oxford

Aroostook

Androscoggin

(M = millions)

$1.7 B 

$540.7 M 

$396.4 M 

$48.3 M 

$32.5 M 

$22.0 M 

$14.8 M 

$6.5 M 

$3.5 M 

$1.7 M 

York

Penobscot

Sagadahoc

Kennebec

Aroostook

Cumberland

Washington

Androscoggin

Hancock

Oxford

$585.9 M 

$66.4 M 

$43.1 M 

$32.9 M 

$31.6 M 

$18.9 M 

$5.7 M 

$3.8 M 

$2.7 M 

$1.3 M 

Aroostook

Washington

Kennebec

Sagadahoc

York Cumberland

Oxford

Aroostook

Penobscot

Androscoggin

Androscoggin

Washington

Sagadahoc

Cumberland

York

Kennebec

Hancock

Oxford

Penobscot Piscataquis

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

57

MAINE
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer**I, Brian Fontana, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of INX Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: March 8, 2007 By  /s/ BRIAN FONTANA   Brian Fontana, Vice President   and Chief Financial Officer