alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11

                           JENKON INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                               YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
                                                            --------------------------
                                                               1999          1998
                                                            -----------  -------------
<S>                                                         <C>          <C>
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
Net income (loss).........................................  $(3,306,807) $     478,474
                                                            -----------  -------------
                                                            -----------  -------------
Basic weighted average shares outstanding.................    3,992,632      1,799,220
Diluted effect of stock options and warrants..............      --             390,377
Conversion of preferred stock.............................      --           1,202,952
                                                            -----------  -------------
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding...............    3,992,632      3,392,549
                                                            -----------  -------------
                                                            -----------  -------------
Basic earnings (loss) per share...........................        (0.83)          0.27
                                                            -----------  -------------
                                                            -----------  -------------
Diluted earnings (loss) per share.........................        (0.83)          0.14
                                                            -----------  -------------
                                                            -----------  -------------
</TABLE>
Bradley A. ELLIOTT and wife, Diane T. Elliott, and Arthur E. Elliott and wife, Margaret E. Elliott, v. The COUNTY OF HALIFAX.

No. 590PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 19, 2005.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous, unpublished decision of the Court of Appeals, 166 N.C.App. 279, 603 S.E.2d 168 (2004), affirming an order entered 14 March 2003 by Judge Dwight L. Cranford in Superior Court, Halifax County. On 6 April 2005, the Supreme Court allowed defendant's motion to consolidate this case with *Manning v. County of Halifax,*166 N.C.App. 279, 603 S.E.2d 168 (2004) for hearing. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 May 2005.

Bradley A. Elliott, Roanoke Rapids, for plaintiff-appellees.

Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, by Christopher W. Jones, Raleigh, for defendant-appellant.

James B. Blackburn, General Counsel, for North Carolina Association of County Commissioners, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Exhibit 23.1



The Board of Directors

Navigant Consulting, Inc.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-81680, 333-30267, 333-103405 and 333-127988) of Navigant Consulting,
Inc. and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 16, 2006 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Navigant Consulting, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of income,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and the related financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appears in the December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Navigant Consulting, Inc.



|            
|------------
|            
|/s/ KPMG LLP
|KPMG LLP    



Chicago, Illinois

March 16, 2006
In the Matter of A.P.R., A.C.R., minor children. appealed by Petitioner, Sharon, R.

No. 515P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Richard Croutharmel, for Sharon R.

Jamie Hamlett, for Alamance Co. DSS.

Robert Collins, Graham, for Alamance Co. GAL.

Donald R., for Father.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 13th day of September 2005 by Respondent in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
David K. EVERSON and Patricia M. Everson v. Douglas E. WRIGHT.

No. 563P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Patricia M. Everson, Pro Se.

David K. Everson, Pro Se.

Douglas E. Wright, Pro Se.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 7th day of October 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Rockingham County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing WorldWide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Winzkowski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
my knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                                        /S/ MICHAEL WINZKOWSKI
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Michael Winzkowski
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        February 13, 2006


                                       25
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert M. Neumeister, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media West LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. November 10, 2004 By:
    /s/ Robert M. Neumeister, Jr.Robert M. Neumeister, Jr.Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kenmar Global Trust for the period January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/    Kenneth A. Shewer
|Name:                    |  | Kenneth A. Shewer                    
|Title:                   |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer           
|                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        
|                         |  | Preferred Investment Solutions Corp.,
|                         |  | Managing Owner of                    
|                         |  | Kenmar Global Trust                  

Date: March 26, 2009
STATE v. JONES.

No. COA05-1264.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Furman Lindell JACOBS.

No. 702P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Richard B. Glazier, Fayetteville, for Furman L. Jacobs.

Ronald Marquette, Special Deputy Attorney General, Rex Gore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of December 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

*7Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 20th day of December 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
# L_2018144EN.01000701.xml

| 8.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 144/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 144/7

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1824 of 14 July 2016 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 3/2014, Delegated Regulation (EU) No 44/2014 and Delegated Regulation (EU) No 134/2014 with regard, respectively, to vehicle functional safety requirements, to vehicle construction and general requirements and to environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 279 of 15 October 2016
  )

On page 5, in point 1 of Annex I, replacing Annex I to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 3/2014, in the table, in the row for UNECE regulation No 74:

for:

‘Supplement 7 to the 00 series of amendments’,

read:

‘Supplement 7 to the 01 series of amendments’.

---
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

 

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES**

 
| **NAME**                                       | ** ** | **JURISDICTION OF  FORMATION** |
|------------------------------------------------|------------|--------------------------------|
| MarkWest Michigan, Inc.                        |       | Colorado                       |
| MarkWest Resources,  Inc.                      |       | Colorado                       |
| Matrex, L.L.C.                                 |       | Michigan                       |
| MarkWest Energy GP,  L.L.C.                    |       | Delaware                       |
| MarkWest Energy  Partners, L.P.                |       | Delaware                       |
| MarkWest Energy  Operating Company, L.L.C.     |       | Delaware                       |
| West Shore Processing  Company, L.L.C.         |       | Michigan                       |
| Basin Pipeline, L.L.C.                         |       | Michigan                       |
| MarkWest Energy  Appalachia, L.L.C.            |       | Delaware                       |
| MarkWest Texas GP,  L.L.C.                     |       | Delaware                       |
| MW Texas Limited,  L.L.C.                      |       | Delaware                       |
| MarkWest Michigan  Pipeline Company, L.L.C.    |       | Michigan                       |
| MarkWest Western  Oklahoma Gas Company, L.L.C. |       | Oklahoma                       |
| MarkWest Power Tex L.P.                        |       | Texas                          |
| MarkWest Pinnacle L.P.                         |       | Texas                          |
| MarkWest Texas PNG  Utility L.P.               |       | Texas                          |
| MarkWest Blackhawk,  L.P.                      |       | Texas                          |
| MarkWest Energy East  Texas Gas Company, L.P.  |       | Delaware                       |
| MarkWest Pipeline  Company, L.P.               |       | Texas                          |
| MarkWest New Mexico,  L.P.                     |       | Texas                          |
| MarkWest Javelina Company                      |       | Texas general partnership      |
| MarkWest Javelina Holding  Company, L.P.       |       | Delaware                       |
| MarkWest Javelina Pipeline  Company            |       | Texas general partnership      |
| MarkWest Javelina Pipeline  Holding, L.P.      |       | Oklahoma                       |
| Starfish Pipeline Company, L.L.C.              |       | Delaware                       |
|                                           |       |                           |

 

----
STATE v. HULCEY.

No. COA05-1148.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from Gaston (04CRS51646, 04CRS51656, 04CRS51653, 04CRS51650).

Case without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth
in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Steven M. Van Dick, in his capacity as Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Hansen Medical, Inc., hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (i) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Hansen Medical, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 16, 2009



/s/ STEVEN M. VAN DICKVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Hansen Medical, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or
after the date of the Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002



I, Benjamin Cohen, certify that:



1. I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Capital Beverage Corporation;



2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this annual report;



4. I
am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and
15d-15) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed
such internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the registrant and its  subsidiaries (collectively,
the “Company”) is made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in which this annual
report is being prepared;



b) evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s internal controls as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report
(the “Evaluation Date”); and



c) presented
in this annual report my conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and  procedures based
on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board
of directors:



a) all
significant deficiencies (if any) in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal
controls; and



6. I
have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that
could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|Date: April 13, 2018 | By: | /s/ Benjamin
    Cohen      
|-------------------- | --- | ----------------------------
|                     |     | Benjamin Cohen              
|                     |     | Principal Accounting Officer
74 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

AECOM $325.2 M

Sierra Nevada Corp. $254.9 M

Huntington Ingalls $147.0 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $111.6 M

M1 Support Services $87.2 M

Mission Support & Test Services, LLC $68.3 M

Korte Construction Co. (KCC) $39.5 M

Intelligent Waves $36.7 M

Chugach Alaska Corp. $26.2 M

Day & Zimmermann Group $22.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

NEVADA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

23,086

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Clark 11,046 2,034 1,994 3,227 18,301

Washoe 29 333 1,865 ND ND

Churchill 1,115 292 102 236 1,745

Carson City ND 182 502 ND ND

Mineral 0 49 0 0 49

Elko ND ND 25 0 ND

Douglas ND ND 0 0 ND

Storey ND 0 0 0 ND

Lincoln 0 ND 0 0 ND

Lyon 0 ND 0 0 ND

Construction: 4% Research and

Development: 1%

Service: 77%

Active Duty: 53%

Civilian: 13%

National 

Guard: 19%

Reserve: 15%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

17%

20%

58%

4%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

10%

65%

2%

$1.3 $1.3

$1.5 $1.6 $1.6 $1.6 $1.6 $1.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#36 #31 0.5% $932 #35 #46 #32 #31

$3.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.4% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$1.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

23,086 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$45.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING

Supplies and 

Equipment: 18%
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 75

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Elko

Nye

Lincoln

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Humboldt

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEVADA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Clark

Washoe

Churchill

Mineral

Carson City

Storey

Lyon

Douglas

Humboldt

Elko

(K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

$914.3 M

$300.7 M

$273.7 M

$36.4 M

$10.4 M

$10.3 M

$5.9 M

$3.0 M

$747.7 K

$536.8 K

Clark

Churchill

Washoe

Carson City

Mineral

Douglas

Storey

Elko

Nye

Lincoln

$1.1 B

$115.3 M

$75.4 M

$37.0 M

$3.6 M

$902.1 K

$874.8 K

$649.9 K

$101.9 K

$97.7 K

Washoe

Elko

Storey

Churchill

Carson City

Douglas

Storey

Churchill

Carson City

Douglas

Mineral

Lyon

Mineral

Washoe

Clark

Clark
CREDLE v. INJECTION TECHNOLOGY

No. COA05-922

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #200785).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.