alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Primex Technologies, Inc.:

Re:        Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-33051)
           Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-18297)
           Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-18299)

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
referenced above of Primex Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 13,
1997 relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Primex Technologies, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
two-year period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December
31, 1996 annual report on form 10-K of Primex Technologies, Inc.

                                                       KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

                                                       /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                                       -------------------------

Tampa, Florida
March 16, 1998
RORY GENE MULLINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-4085

_____________________________/

Opinion filed January 21, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John F. Simon, Jr., Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, THOMAS, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Marc L. Reisch,certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Visant Holding Corp.;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Eachregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for each such registrant and we have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to such registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring this period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of such registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in such registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter hathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, suchregistrants’ internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Eachregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of such registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect such registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in such registrants’ internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 11, 2006 | /s/ Marc L.  Reisch        |
|-----------------------|----------------------------|
|                  | Marc L. Reisch             |
|                  | *President  and*           |
|                  | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
McGLADREY & PULLEN, L.L.P. v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT EXAMINERS.

No. 469A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

William L. Rikard, Jr., Deborah L. Edney, Charlotte, Jack L. Cozort, Raleigh, for McGladry & Pullen.

Noel L. Allen, M. Jackson Nichols, Raleigh, for Board of CPA Examiners.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 23rd day of August 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Plaintiff on the 23rd day of August 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Plaintiff's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more that 30 days from the date of certification of this order.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5427 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5427

   To provide that no tax or fee may be imposed on certain coins and 
                                bullion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2008

   Mr. Paul introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on the 
 Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 
 in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that no tax or fee may be imposed on certain coins and 
                                bullion.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax-Free Gold Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. NO TAX ON CERTAIN COINS AND BULLION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law--
            (1) no tax may be imposed on (or with respect to the sale, 
        exchange, or other disposition of) any coin, medal, token, or 
        gold, silver, platinum, palladium, or rhodium bullion, whether 
        issued by a State, the United States, a foreign government, or 
        any other person, and
            (2) no State may assess any tax or fee on any currency, or 
        any other monetary instrument, which is used in the transaction 
        of interstate commerce or commerce with a foreign country, and 
        which is subject to the enjoyment of legal tender status under 
        article I, section 10 of the United States Constitution.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on December 31, 
2008, but shall not apply to taxes or fees imposed before such date.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5536 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5536

To require the Secretary of Commerce to prescribe regulations to reduce 
the incidence of vessels colliding with North Atlantic right whales by 
         limiting the speed of vessels, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2008

Mr. Allen (for himself and Mr. Gonzalez) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Commerce to prescribe regulations to reduce 
the incidence of vessels colliding with North Atlantic right whales by 
         limiting the speed of vessels, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REGULATIONS TO PROTECT NORTH ATLANTIC RIGHT WHALES FROM SHIP 
              STRIKES.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the earlier of the 
date of the enactment of this Act or June 1, 2008, the Secretary of 
Commerce, acting through the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere, 
shall prescribe regulations to reduce the incidence of vessels 
colliding with North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) by 
limiting the speed of vessels.
    (b) Incorporation of Proposed Rule.--The regulations required by 
subsection (a) shall--
            (1) incorporate the whale protection measures contained in 
        the proposed rule entitled ``Endangered Fish and Wildlife; 
        Proposed Rule to Implement Speed Restrictions to Reduce the 
        Threat of Ship Collisions with North Atlantic Right Whales'' 
        (71 Fed. Reg. 36299; June 26, 2006); and
            (2) provide the same or greater level of protection against 
        collisions with vessels.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14934]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: July 29, 2022, 1 p.m. EDT (2 hours).

PLACE: Public Meeting Hosted via Zoom. Access information is provided 
below: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/
1618682477?pwd=L09Fa1l[bond]R2[bond]1NFVFNXUwT2dwWFV[bond]QT09.
    Meeting ID: 161 868 2477.
    Passcode: 569066.
    One tap mobile: +16692545252,,1618682477# US (San Jose), 
+16692161590,,1618682477# US (San Jose).
    Dial by your location: +1 669 254 5252 US (San Jose), +1 669 216 
1590 US (San Jose), +1 646 828 7666 US (New York), +1 551 285 1373 US.
    Meeting ID: 161 868 2477.
    Find your local number: https://www.zoomgov.com/u/admZHYbUH3.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation 
Board (CSB) will convene a public meeting on Friday, July 29, 2022, at 
1 p.m. EDT. This meeting serves to fulfill its quarterly July public 
meeting requirement. The Board will review the CSB's progress in 
meeting its mission and highlight current investigations and safety 
recommendations.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Hillary Cohen, Communications 
Manager, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e19194838d8882a1829283cf868e97"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e09095828c8983a0839382ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 446-8094. Further information about 
this public meeting can be found on the CSB website at: www.csb.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The CSB is an independent federal agency charged with investigating 
incidents and hazards that result, or may result, in the catastrophic 
release of extremely hazardous substances. The agency's Board Members 
are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. CSB 
investigations look into all aspects of chemical accidents and hazards, 
including physical causes such as equipment failure as well as 
inadequacies in regulations, industry standards, and safety management 
systems.

Public Participation

    The meeting is free and open to the public. This meeting will only 
be available via ZOOM. Close captions (CC) will be provided. There will 
be an opportunity for public comment at the end of the meeting. To 
submit public comments for the record please email us at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#275752454b4e446744544509404851"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5c5c0d7d9dcd6f5d6c6d79bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: July 7, 2022.
Tamara Qureshi,
Assistant General Counsel, Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation 
Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-14934 Filed 7-8-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6350-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DANIEL SCHWARTZ,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 416 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of April, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### In the Matter of Larry Porter, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[800 NYS2d 856]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of lewd exposure, harassment, interference with a prison employee and refusing a direct order in violation of the prison disciplinary rules. That determination was upheld on administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

Contrary to petitioner’s contentions, the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of its author, together with the log book entry and the videotape of the assistant’s visit, provide substantial evidence of his guilt *(see Matter of Green v Goord,*284 AD2d 677 [2001]; *Matter of Smith v Goord,*275 AD2d 827*1200[2000]). To the extent that they were preserved, petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
ZALIAGIRIS v. ZALIAGIRIS.

No. 332A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Preston O. Odom, III, Charlotte, for Elizabeth Smith Zaliagiris.

Tate Sterrett, Kary C. Watson, Charlotte, for Thomas E. Zaliagiris.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 1st day of November 2005 by Plaintiff to Strike Defendant Appellee's New Brief and to preclude any presentation from Defendant Appellee at oral argument:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of November 2005."
##### 



EXHIBIT (31.1)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a/15d OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I
are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;(b)
    
    [omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238 and
33-8760 and Rule 14d-14(a) under the Exchange Act];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I
have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.
  /s/ ELMER DOTYElmer DotyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5574 

To prohibit the transport of hydrolysate from the Pueblo Chemical Depot, 

Colorado, or the Blue Grass Army Depot, Kentucky, to an off-site location. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 10, 2008 

Mr. SALAZAR (for himself, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, and Mr. CHANDLER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To prohibit the transport of hydrolysate from the Pueblo 

Chemical Depot, Colorado, or the Blue Grass Army 

Depot, Kentucky, to an off-site location. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TRANSPORT OF HYDROLY4 SATE AT CERTAIN ARMY DEPOTS. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—The Secretary of Defense may 

6 not transport hydrolysate from the Pueblo Chemical 

7 Depot, Colorado, or the Blue Grass Army Depot, Ken8 tucky, to an off-site location for treatment, storage, or dis9 posal. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5574 IH

1 (b) SAVINGS CLAUSE.—Nothing in this Act limits or 

2 otherwise affects section 8119 of the Department of De3 fense Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 110–116; 50 

4 U.S.C. 1521 note). 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
116 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

WISCONSIN 

#27 #34 0.9% $942 #24 #36 #42

$5.5 B SPENT IN 1.6% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $4.9 B CONTRACT 18,061 NUMBER OF $0.6 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Development: 1%

Service: 10%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 89% Construction: 0%

By Service 

Army

51%

Navy/Marines

34%

Air Force

2%

Other Defense

13%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 4%

Reserve: 27% Civilian: 16%

National Guard: 53%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

77%

Navy/Marines

6%

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Oshkosh Corp.

Fincantieri Group

Enpro Industries Inc.

UnitedHealth Group

Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance

Steel Partners Holdings LP

General Electric

National Presto Industries

Coltec Industries Inc.

Leonardo SpA

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.5 B

$802.2 M

$121.6 M

$89.4 M

$83.5 M

$77.5 M

$71.9 M

$63.2 M

$58.7 M

$50.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.9 $4.3

$3.1 $3.0

FY13 FY16

$2.6 $2.4 $2.1

$1.4

FY14 FY15 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

$604.9 MILLION 18,061

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Dane 150 594 2,432

Milwaukee 207 396 1,254

Monroe 302 1,176 215

Juneau 0 180 743

Brown 23 31 137

Winnebago 35 49 178

Waukesha ND 23 334

Marathon ND 23 171

La Crosse ND ND 155

Fond du Lac ND 0 258

Reserve

730

1,242

725

0

557

272

105

216

210

79

Total

3,906

3,099

2,418

923

748

534

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020 117

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

WISCONSIN FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

Winnebago

Marinette

Waukesha

Milwaukee

Rock

Dane

La Crosse

Kenosha

Monroe

Waupaca

(M = millions)

$2.5 B

$807.4 M

$264.2 M

$252.2 M

$247.0 M

$216.1 M

$132.0 M

$128.9 M

$102.0 M

$37.0 M

Dane

Monroe

Milwaukee

Juneau

Brown

Winnebago

La Crosse

Marathon

Buffalo

Marinette

$150.5 M

$132.9 M

$100.5 M

$33.7 M

$14.6 M

$13.7 M

$9.9 M

$8.9 M

$8.4 M 

$7.9 M

Monroe

La Crosse

Marinette

Dane

Waukesha

Rock

Kenosha

Milwaukee

Waupaca

Winnebago

Dane

Milwaukee

Monroe

La Crosse Winnebago

Marinette

Buffalo

Marathon

Juneau

Brown