alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-28,195-06

EX P ARTE F RED S. MUNOZ , Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 13-298-A IN THE 130TH DIST RICT COURT

F ROM MA TAGORD A COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1 9 6 7 ). Ap p l icant was convicted of burg lary of a building and sentenc ed to twenty months’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appea l his conviction. Applicant contends, among o th e r th in g s , th a t h is p le a w a s in

voluntary beca

use counsel falsely informed Ap p l i ca n t that the State had a DNA blood test linking him to the burg lary

. Applicant contends there was no s u ch evidenc e, and that counsel used this tactic to coer ce Applicant into pleading g uilty

. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief

. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 2942

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims of ineff ec tive assistance of counsel and involuntary plea. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial c ourt elec ts to hold a hearing , it sha ll de termine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr es en t ed by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repre sent Applicant a t the hear ing. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial c ourt shall make f indings of f

act a nd conclusions of law in r eg ard to Applicant’s claim that his plea was involuntary

. The trial cour t s h al l m ak e finding s as to whether the perf ormanc e of Applicant’s attorney was defic ient and, if so, whether counsel’ s defic ient perf ormanc e prejudice d Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fact and conclusions of law that it deems rele vant and appropr iate to the dispositi on of Applicant’s claim for habea s corpus re lief. This application will be held in abey ance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be re s o l v ed wi t h in 90 day s of this order

. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hear ing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwar ded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order. Any extensions of t ime shall be obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: January

28, 2015 Do not publish
IOWA 

ηϯε

ΨϮ͘ρ^WEd/E

STATE 

ηϯε

ϭ͘ϯйK&^dd'W

Ϭ͘ρй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

ΨϳΘΘ

PER RESIDENT 

#34 

ΨϮ͘ϭKEdZd

SPENDING 

ηκϭ

ϭϮ͕εϮϬEhDZK&

PERSONNEL 

ηκΘ

ΨϬ͘κWZ^KEE>

SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ

ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ Ϭй ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ςй

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ ϭϭй

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐ ĂŶĚ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗Θϯй

By Service 

Army 

24% 

Navy/Marines 

47% 

Air Force 

22% 

Other Defense 

6% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Active Duty: 2% 

Civilian: 13% Reserve: 19% 

National Guard: 66% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

78% 

Navy/Marines 

3% 

Air Force 

18% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

hŶŝƚĞĚdĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐ Ψϭ͘Ϯ

ŵĞƌŝĐĂŶKƌĚŶĂŶĐĞ ΨϮϳε͘ϭD

ZŽĐŬǁĞůůŽůůŝŶƐ ΨϮϬϳ͘ρD

>ŽĐŬŚĞĞĚDĂƌƟŶ Ψϭϯρ͘ϯD

ŽďŚĂŵ Ψεϭ͘ϬD

ĂƚĂ>ŝŶŬ^ŽůƵƟŽŶƐ ΨϮϳ͘ςD

ZŽĐŬǁĞůůŽůůŝŶƐͲ^sŝƐŝŽŶ^LJƐƚĞŵƐ ΨϮρ͘κD

ĞdžƚĞƌƉĂĐŚĞ,ŽůĚŝŶŐƐ/ŶĐ͘ Ψϭρ͘εD

ĂƌǀĞƌWƵŵƉŽŵƉĂŶLJ Ψϭκ͘ΘD

ZŽƐĞŶďŽŽŵDĂĐŚŝŶĞΘdŽŽů/ŶĐ͘ ΨϭϮ͘ϭD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ΨϮ͘ϭ Ψϭ͘ε

Ψϭ͘ς

Ψϭ͘Ϯ Ψϭ͘ϭ Ψϭ͘ϭ Ψϭ͘ϭ Ψϭ͘Ϭ

&zϭϮ &zϭϯ &zϭκ &zϭρ &zϭς &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Ψϯρς͘ϮD/>>/KE ϭϮ͕εϮϬ

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

ŽƵŶƚLJ ĐƟǀĞ

ƵƚLJ

ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

'ƵĂƌĚ

WŽůŬ ϭϭϯ ϳςϭ ϯ͕Ϯϭϳ

tŽŽĚďƵƌLJ E Ϯςϳ ϭ͕Ϭεϯ

^ĐŽƩ E ϭϳϮ ϮΘς

>ŝŶŶ E ϭϬϳ ϯϮΘ

:ŽŚŶƐŽŶ κρ ϯϬ κϭρ

ůĂĐŬ,ĂǁŬ Ϯε ςΘ ϯϳκ

ŽŽŶĞ Ϭ ρΘ ϯςϯ

ƵďƵƋƵĞ E ϮΘ ϮϮϳ

WŽƩĂǁĂƩĂŵŝĞ Ϭ ϭς Ϯκς

tĞďƐƚĞƌ Ϭ ϯς ϮϬϭ

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

ϭ͕ϮϬϬ ρ͕Ϯεϭ

ρϬ E

ϮϮς E

ϮϮε E

ϭκΘ ςϯΘ

ερ ρςς

Ϭ κϮϭ

ϭϯκ E

ςκ ϯϮς

κϮ Ϯϳε

κΘ KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR 2 0 1 8 IOWA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

ƵďƵƋƵĞ

tĞďƐƚĞƌ ůĂĐŬ,ĂǁŬ

tŽŽĚďƵƌLJ >ŝŶŶ ŽŽŶĞ

WŽůŬ

:ŽŚŶƐŽŶ

^ĐŽƚƚ

WŽƚƚĂǁĂƚƚĂŵŝĞ

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

KΖƌŝĞŶ

ƌĞŵĞƌ

>ŝŶŶ

:ŽŚŶƐŽŶ

^ĐŽƚƚ

DƵƐĐĂƚŝŶĞ

hŶŝŽŶ >ĞĞ ĞƐDŽŝŶĞƐ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

>ŝŶŶ

ĞƐDŽŝŶĞƐ

^ĐŽƩ

WŽůŬ

DƵƐĐĂƟŶĞ

KΖƌŝĞŶ

ƌĞŵĞƌ

:ŽŚŶƐŽŶ

>ĞĞ

hŶŝŽŶ

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψϭ͘ς

ΨϮΘϬ͘ϭD

Ψϭςϯ͘ϬD

Ψρε͘ϳD

ΨϮρ͘ϬD

ΨϭϮ͘ϭD

ΨΘ͘ϳD

ΨΘ͘κD

$3.7 M 

$2.4 M 

WŽůŬ

tŽŽĚďƵƌLJ

^ĐŽƩ

>ŝŶŶ

:ŽŚŶƐŽŶ

ůĂĐŬ,ĂǁŬ

ŽŽŶĞ

ƵďƵƋƵĞ

tĞďƐƚĞƌ

WŽƩĂǁĂƩĂŵŝĞ

ΨϭΘϬ͘κD

Ψκϭ͘ϬD

ΨϭΘ͘κD

Ψϭς͘ϭD

Ψϭρ͘ϭD

Ψϭϯ͘ΘD

ΨϭϮ͘κD

$7.3 M 

Ψς͘ϯD

Ψρ͘ϮD

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

WŽůŬ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε κε
IN RE T.P.

No. COA05-182.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Cabarrus (01J152).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of AER Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 12, 2004



/s/ Paul John

---------------------------------------------------------

Paul John, Treasurer and Director

Principal Financial Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5339 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bromoxynil Octonoate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mrs. BIGGERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bromoxynil 

Octonoate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BROMOXYNIL OCTONOATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.97 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Bromoxynil Octonoate) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5339 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5065 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Cypermenthrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2008 

Mr. SESTAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Cypermenthrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYPERMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.74 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Cypermethrin) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5065 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Jimmy Earl McARTHUR.

No. 444P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General. C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th day of August 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*626"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
**EXHIBIT 32.3**

# **CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report of Visant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc L. Reisch, the Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Date: May 14, 2007 |   | /s/ Marc L.  Reisch            |
|--------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|               |   | Marc L. Reisch                 |
|               |   | *President  and*               |
|               |   | *Chief  Executive Officer*     |
|               |   | (principal  executive officer) |

 

----
- Home
- Facts
- Where do I go to get real-time coastal conditions?

# **Where do I get real-time and forecast coastal conditions?**

## National **coastal conditions** are available online with **NOAA's nowCOASTTM**

Heading out on the water? Visit nowCOAST to view real-time and forecast tides, winds, currents, and much more. 

##### **Did you know?**

*There are two versions of nowCOAST: one version is for use by the general public and one version is enhanced for mariners. The map for mariners adds many additional features, such as raster and electronic nautical chart (RNC/ENC) underlays, National Weather Service coastal marine zone forecasts, and offshore weather observations from ships and buoys. Look for the button in the upper right corner of the application to choose which version you would like to view.*

NOAA's nowCOAST is a GIS-based webmap service that provides frequently updated weather and ocean observations along with coastal and marine weather forecasts  24 hours a day. The free online map viewer offers point-and-click access to 60 NOAA data products and services all in one place. With nowCOAST, you  can get a one-stop-shop look at coastal conditions — real-time and forecast — before you do or plan anything on the water. 

The nowCOAST map viewer displays animated observations for the past four hours and forecasts for the next seven days. The map incorporates data from NOAA's National Ocean Service; National Weather Service; and National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service. Data includes watches, warnings, and advisories for hazardous weather and marine weather conditions such as special marine warnings and gale warnings — even far offshore. It also provides near-real-time weather radar data, weather satellite imagery, and lightning strike density data for both land and overwater areas, sea surface temperature analyses, and predictions from NOAA’s ocean forecast models. Advanced users may also ingest maps of NOAA data and predictions directly into third-party applications using nowCOAST web map services.

NowCOAST is an ArcGIS-based web mapping application developed by NOAA's Coast Survey Development Laboratory and hosted in NOAA's Integrated Dissemination Program Infrastructure operated by the National Weather Service's National Centers for Environmental Prediction.

##### More **Information**

 nowCOAST 

 Office of Coast Survey 

##### **Last updated:**

######  						 01/18/24 					

**Author:** NOAA

How to cite this article

Contact Us

##### 					Feedback

              -  Provide Feedback 
              -  Contact Us
              -  Report an error

##### 					Social

              - 
              - 
              - 
*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
							About NOS						- About Us
- NOS Program Offices
- Media Inquiries
- Website Acknowledgements
- Site Index
- Disclaimer
							More Resources						- Freedom of Information Act
- Accessibility
- Information Quality
- Privacy Policy
- NOS For Employees
- USA.gov
-  Department of Commerce
-  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
-  National Ocean Service
# L_2016255EN.01001201.xml

| 21.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 255/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 255/12

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1687

of 20 September 2016

implementing Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 of 18 January 2016 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya and repealing Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 (1), and in particular Article 21(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/44. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/44.

| (2) | One person should be removed from the list of natural persons subject to restrictive measures as set out in Section A of Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

One person should be removed from the list of natural persons subject to restrictive measures as set out in Section A of Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44.

| (3) | Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is hereby amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 20 September 2016.

For the Council

The President

I. KORČOK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

The name of the following person and the related entry are deleted from the list set out in Section A of Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44:

A.   Persons

| 15. | Colonel Taher JUWADI |
| --- | --- |

15.

Colonel Taher JUWADI

---
STATE v. Terry Alvin HYATT.

No. 402A00-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 15, 2005.

Faith S. Bushnaq, for Terry Alvin Hyatt.

Valerie B. Spalding, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ronald K. Moore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 12th day of July 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Terry Alvin Hyatt) shall have up to and including the 9th day of September 2005 to file and serve his/her Petition for Writ of Certiorari with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 15th day of July 2005."
(September 15, 2005)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mark Scott Miller, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 782]

*1147Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), rendered June 29, 2001 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of manslaughter in the second degree, vehicular manslaughter in the second degree and driving while intoxicated (two counts).

In accordance with our prior decision (17 AD3d 708 [2005]), Supreme Court held a hearing at which it was established that the blood sample taken following defendant’s arrest was withdrawn by a registered nurse. In his supplemental brief, defendant asserts that the blood test results must nevertheless be suppressed since the blood sample was not withdrawn at the request of a police officer *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1194 [4] [a] [1]) and defendant was not advised of his right to have an additional chemical test by a physician of his choosing *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1194 [4] [b]). Defendant’s first assertion is belied by the cross-examination testimony of an investigator with the Town of Guilderland Police Department who testified at the suppression hearing that he requested the nurse withdraw the blood sample. Second, although defendant has a right to the administration of a chemical test by a physician of his choosing *(see*Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1194 [4] [b]), the statute imposes no burden on the police to advise a defendant of this right *(see People v Finnegan,*85 NY2d 53, 57-59 [1995]; *People v Alvarez,*70 NY2d 375, 381 [1987]; *People v Cegelski,*142 Misc 2d 1023, 1024 [1989], *lv denied*74 NY2d 846 [1989]). Thus, we now find no error in Supreme Court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress the results of the blood test.

Next, we find no error in Supreme Court’s refusal to suppress oral statements made by defendant at the scene of the accident prior to his arrest. We agree that under the circumstances then existing, no reasonable person would have thought that he was in police custody *(see People v Yukl,*25 NY2d 585, 589-591 [1969]) and the statements made by defendant resulted from investigative questioning *(see People v Tankleff,*84 NY2d 992, 994 [1994]) or were spontaneously made by defendant during the performance of field sobriety tests.

Lastly, defendant asserts that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive in view of his overwhelming and sincere remorse. As the sentence imposed is within the statutory parameters for this second felony offender *(see*Penal Law § 70.06) and we find neither a clear abuse of discretion nor the presence of extraordinary circumstances *(see People v Perkins,*5 AD3d 801, 804 [2004]; *People v Johnson,*307 AD2d 384, 385 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 574 [2003]), we decline to modify it.

*1148Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
STATE v. YOKLEY

No. COA04-1483.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed November 15, 2005.

Certification Date December 5, 2005

Appeal from the Davidson (03CRS3881, 03CRS52172, 03CRS52173).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
CAPPS v. NW SIGN INDUSTRIES et al.

No. 383A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Norman W. Shearin, Jr., Kitty Hawk, for NW Sign Industries, et al.

Jared E. Gardner, Charlotte, for Capps.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of October 2005 by Defendants to Suspend Rules and/or Extend Time to File Appellant's Brief:

"Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of November 2005."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5381 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5381

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Methyl cinnamate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Methyl cinnamate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. METHYL CINNAMATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Methyl cinnamate) is amended 
by striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/
31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5389 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on o-tert-Butylcyclohexanol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on o-tertButylcyclohexanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. O-TERT-BUTYLCYCLOHEXANOL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.62 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 o-tert-Butylcyclohexanol) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5389 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS