40830 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 

Verification tracking 

flag Verification tracking group name FAFSA information required to be verified 

Tax Filers and Non-Tax Filers: 

• Number of Household Members. 

• Number in College. 

V2 .......................... Reserved ................................................................................ N/A. 

V3 .......................... Reserved ................................................................................ N/A. 

V4 .......................... Custom Verification Group ..................................................... • Identity/Statement of Educational Purpose. 

V5 .......................... Aggregate Verification Group ................................................. Tax Filers: 

• Adjusted Gross Income. 

• U.S. Income Tax Paid. 

• Untaxed Portions of IRA Distributions and Pensions. 

• IRA Deductions and Payments. 

• Tax Exempt Interest Income. 

• Education Tax Credits. 

Non-Tax Filers: 

• Income Earned from Work. 

Tax Filers and Non-Tax Filers: 

• Number of Household Members. 

• Number in College. 

• Identity/Statement of Educational Purpose. 

V6 .......................... Reserved ................................................................................ N/A. 

Other Sources for Detailed Information 

We provide a more detailed 

discussion on the verification process in 

the following resources that will be 

available on the Knowledge Center web 

page at https://fsapartners.ed.gov/ 

knowledge-center: 

• 2023–2024 Application and 

Verification Guide. 

• 2023–2024 ISIR Guide. 

• 2023–2024 SAR Comment Codes 

and Text. 

• 2023–2024 COD Technical 

Reference. 

• Program Integrity Information— 

Questions and Answers on Verification 

at www2.ed.gov/policy/highered/reg/ 

hearulemaking/2009/verification.html. 

Accessible Format: On request to the 

program contact person listed under FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT, 

individuals with disabilities can obtain 

this document in an accessible format. 

The Department will provide the 

requestor with an accessible format that 

may include Rich Text Format (RTF) or 

text format (txt), a thumb drive, an MP3 

file, braille, large print, audiotape, or 

compact disc or other accessible format. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. You may access the official 

edition of the Federal Register and the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 

www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can 

view this document, as well as all other 

documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Portable Document Format 

(PDF). To use PDF, you must have 

Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at: www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1070a, 

1070b–1070b–4, 1087a–1087j, and 20 

U.S.C. 1087–51–1087–58. 

Annmarie Weisman, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, 

Planning, and Innovation, Office of 

Postsecondary Education. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14511 Filed 7–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Draft Supplemental Environmental 

Impact Statement for the Long-Term 

Management and Storage of Elemental 

Mercury 

AGENCY: Office of Environmental 

Management, Department of Energy. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Energy (DOE) announces the availability 

of the second Draft Long-Term 

Management and Storage of Elemental 

Mercury Supplemental Environmental 

Impact Statement (Draft Mercury 

Storage SEIS–II, DOE/EIS–0423–S2D) 

for public comment. As required by the 

Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 and the 

2016 Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical 

Safety for the 21st Century Act (all 

together referred to as MEBA), DOE 

proposes to identify an existing facility 

or facilities for the long-term 

management and storage of elemental 

mercury generated within the United 

States. To this end, DOE issued the 

Final Environmental Impact Statement 

for the Long-Term Management and 

Storage of Elemental Mercury (Mercury 

Storage EIS, DOE/EIS–0423, January 

2011) and the first Final Long-Term 

Management and Storage of Elemental 

Mercury Supplemental Environmental 

Impact Statement (Mercury Storage 

SEIS, DOE/EIS–0423–S1, September 

2013), which analyzed reasonable 

alternatives, in accordance with the 

National Environmental Policy Act 

(NEPA), for locating and developing 

such a facility. On May 24, 2021, DOE 

announced its intent to prepare a 

second supplement to the Mercury 

Storage EIS to update these previous 

analyses of potential environmental 

impacts and analyze additional 

alternatives, in accordance with NEPA. 

DATES: DOE invites public comment on 

this Draft Mercury Storage SEIS–II 

during a 45-day public comment period, 

which commences with the publication 

of this Notice in the Federal Register 

and continues until August 22, 2022. In 

preparing the Final Mercury Storage 

SEIS–II, DOE will consider all 

comments received by that date. 

Comments received after that date will 

be considered to the extent practicable. 

DOE will hold two web-based public 

hearings via Zoom. The hearings will 

cover the same material. The first 

hearing will be held on August 2, 2022, 

from 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. EDT. The 

second hearing will be held on August 

4, 2022, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. 

EDT. See Section V, ‘‘Public 

Participation,’’ for further information 

on the public comment process and the 

web-based hearings. 

ADDRESSES: Additional information 

regarding the SEIS–II, the 2011 Mercury 

Storage EIS, 2013 Mercury Storage SEIS, 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 40831 

and other related documents is available 

online at: https://www.energy.gov/nepa/ 

doeeis-0423-s2-supplementalenvironmental-impact-statement-longterm-management-and-storage. Please 

direct written comments or questions on 

the Draft Mercury Storage SEIS–II using 

one of the following methods: 

• Zoom Hearing Room (during the 

scheduled dates); details regarding the 

web-based public hearing are provided 

in Section V, ‘‘Public Participation:’’ 

https://em-doe.zoomgov.com/j/ 

1608025687?pwd=Zndsbkp6THA4V2lF

dXE3ZGExclF6Zz09 (copy and paste 

into web browser). 

• Email: ElementalMercury_NEPA@

em.doe.gov. Please submit comments as 

an email message or email attachment 

(i.e., Microsoft Word or PDF file format) 

without encryption. 

• Postal mail: Please submit 

comments by U.S. Mail to Ms. Julia 

Donkin, NEPA Document Manager, 

Office of Environmental Management, 

U.S. Department of Energy, EM–4.22, 

1000 Independence Avenue SW, 

Washington, DC 20585. 

The Draft Mercury Storage SEIS–II is 

available at: https://www.energy.gov/ 

nepa/doeeis-0423-s2-supplementalenvironmental-impact-statement-longterm-management-and-storage. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Questions concerning the Draft Mercury 

Storage SEIS–II or the public hearing 

can be sent to Ms. Julia Donkin, NEPA 

Document Manager, Office of 

Environmental Management, U.S. 

Department of Energy, EM–4.22, 1000 

Independence Avenue SW, Washington, 

DC 20585, (202) 586–5000, or to 

Julia.Donkin@em.doe.gov. Direct 

questions specific to DOE’s elemental 

mercury program to Mr. David Haught, 

Mercury Program Manager, Office of 

Environmental Management, U.S. 

Department of Energy, EM–4.22, 1000 

Independence Avenue SW, Washington, 

DC 20585, (202) 586–5000, or to 

David.Haught@hq.doe.gov. 

For general information concerning 

the DOE Office of Environmental 

Management NEPA process, please 

contact Mr. William Ostrum, Office of 

Environmental Management NEPA 

Compliance Officer, U.S. Department of 

Energy, EM–4.31, 1000 Independence 

Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585, 

(202) 586–2513, or to William.Ostrum@

hq.doe.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

The Mercury Export Ban Act of 2008 

(Pub. L. 110–414) and the 2016 Frank R. 

Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st 

Century Act (Pub. L. 114–182) (all 

together referred to as MEBA), amended 

the Toxic Substances Control Act 

(TSCA; 15 U.S.C. 2601–2629) and the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act (RCRA; 42 U.S.C. 6939f) to address, 

among other things, the export and longterm management and storage of 

elemental mercury. MEBA prohibits the 

sale, distribution, or transfer by Federal 

agencies to any other Federal agency, 

any state or local government agency, or 

any private individual or entity, of any 

elemental mercury under the control or 

jurisdiction of a Federal agency (with 

certain limited exceptions). MEBA also 

amended section 266(c) of TSCA to 

prohibit the export of elemental 

mercury from the United States (with 

certain limited exceptions). MEBA 

directs DOE to designate a facility (or 

facilities) of DOE for the long-term 

management and storage of elemental 

mercury generated within the United 

States. MEBA further provides the 

Secretary of Energy with the authority to 

establish such terms, conditions, and 

procedures as are necessary to carry out 

this long-term management and storage 

function. Although the phrase ‘‘facility 

(or facilities) of [DOE]’’ is not defined in 

MEBA, DOE has a longstanding practice 

in various other contexts of leasing 

facilities to accomplish the 

Department’s core mission. Consistent 

with that practice, DOE construes the 

term ‘‘facility of DOE’’ to include a 

facility leased from a commercial entity 

or by another Federal agency over 

which the Department provides an 

appropriate level of oversight and 

guidance. Accordingly, if DOE were to 

designate a facility that currently is 

owned by a commercial entity or by 

another Federal agency, DOE would 

obtain an appropriate leasehold interest 

in that facility to comply with MEBA. 

DOE would ensure that any such facility 

currently owned by a commercial entity 

or by another Federal agency would 

afford DOE an appropriate level of 

responsibility and control over the 

facility. 

The primary sources of elemental 

mercury in the United States include 

mercury generated as a byproduct of the 

gold-mining process and mercury 

reclaimed from recycling and waste 

recovery activities. In addition, DOE 

National Nuclear Security 

Administration (NNSA) stores 

approximately 1,200 metric tons of 

elemental mercury at the Oak Ridge 

Reservation in Tennessee, which was 

generated in support of NNSA’s 

mission. 

The 2011 Mercury Storage EIS 

evaluated seven candidate locations for 

the elemental mercury storage facility, 

as well as a No-Action Alternative. The 

locations included new facility 

construction, use of existing facilities, or 

both. The candidate locations evaluated 

in 2011 were: DOE Grand Junction 

Disposal site near Grand Junction, 

Colorado (new construction); DOE 

Hanford Site near Richland, Washington 

(new construction); Hawthorne Army 

Depot near Hawthorne, Nevada (existing 

facilities); DOE Idaho National 

Laboratory near Idaho Falls, Idaho (new 

construction and an existing facility); 

Kansas City Plant in Kansas City, 

Missouri (existing facility); DOE 

Savannah River Site near Aiken, South 

Carolina (new construction); and the 

Waste Control Specialists LLC (WCS) 

site near Andrews, Texas (new 

construction and an existing facility). 

The 2013 Mercury Storage SEIS 

evaluated three additional alternative 

locations, all in the vicinity of the Waste 

Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, New 

Mexico (all new construction). The 2013 

Mercury Storage SEIS also updated 

some of the relevant analyses for 

alternatives presented in the 2011 

Mercury Storage EIS. 

For the 2011 Mercury Storage EIS and 

the 2013 Mercury Storage SEIS, DOE 

estimated that up to approximately 

10,000 metric tons of elemental mercury 

would need to be managed and stored 

at the DOE facility during the 40-year 

period of analysis. 

On December 6, 2019, DOE issued a 

Record of Decision (ROD) to document 

its designation of the WCS site near 

Andrews, Texas, for the management 

and storage of up to 6,800 metric tons 

of elemental mercury in leased portions 

of existing buildings at the WCS site (84 

FR 66890). The ROD was supported by 

DOE’s Supplement Analysis of the Final 

Long-Term Management and Storage of 

Elemental Mercury Environmental 

Impact Statement (DOE/EIS–0423–SA– 

1), which determined that the long-term 

management and storage of up to 6,800 

metric tons of elemental mercury in 

existing buildings at the WCS site 

would not constitute a substantial 

change from the proposal evaluated in 

the 2011 Mercury Storage EIS and 

updated in the 2013 Mercury Storage 

SEIS. On December 23, 2019, DOE 

published its rule to establish the fee for 

long-term management and storage of 

elemental mercury (84 FR 70402; the 

‘‘Fee Rule’’). 

Two domestic generators of elemental 

mercury subsequently filed complaints 

in United States District Court 

challenging, among other things, the 

validity of the Fee Rule and the ROD 

(Coeur Rochester, Inc. v. Brouillette et 

al., Case No. 1:19–cv–03860–RJL [D.D.C. 

filed December 31, 2019] and Nevada 

Gold Mines LLC v. Brouillette et al., Case 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
40832 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 

1Conveyance of title pertains to mercury 

accumulated in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 

6939f(g)(2)(D). 

No. 1:20–cv–00141–RJL [D.D.C filed 

January 17, 2020]). On August 21, 2020, 

DOE and Nevada Gold Mines LLC 

executed a settlement agreement that 

resolved Nevada Gold Mines’ lawsuit. 

Consistent with that agreement, on 

September 3, 2020, DOE filed a motion 

in the District Court asking the Court to 

vacate and remand the Fee Rule. The 

District Court granted the motion to 

vacate and remand the Fee Rule on 

September 5, 2020. Given the 

rulemaking process required to establish 

a fee for the long-term management and 

storage of elemental mercury, and the 

expiration of DOE’s lease with WCS in 

June 2021, DOE also agreed in the 

settlement with Nevada Gold Mines to 

withdraw the designation of WCS. DOE 

subsequently withdrew the designation 

of WCS under MEBA in an amended 

ROD on October 6, 2020 (85 FR 63105). 

On April 25, 2021, the District Court 

signed a joint stipulation to dismiss 

Coeur Rochester, Inc.’s lawsuit. 

II. Purpose and Need for Action 

MEBA established January 1, 2019, as 

the date by which a DOE facility for the 

long-term management and storage of 

elemental mercury generated within the 

United States must be operational. 

MEBA requires that DOE adjust fees for 

generators temporarily accumulating 

elemental mercury if the DOE facility is 

not operational by January 1, 2019. If 

the DOE facility is not operational by 

January 1, 2020, DOE must: (1) 

immediately accept the conveyance of 

title to all elemental mercury that has 

accumulated on site prior to January 1, 

2020,1 (2) pay any applicable Federal 

permitting costs, and (3) store, or pay 

the cost of storage of, until the time at 

which a facility is operational, 

accumulated mercury to which the 

Secretary has title in a facility that has 

been issued a permit. Because statutory 

milestone dates have now passed, DOE 

needs to designate a facility and begin 

accepting elemental mercury as soon as 

practicable. 

III. Proposed Action 

DOE proposes to designate one or 

more facilities for the long-term 

management and storage of elemental 

mercury in accordance with MEBA. 

Facilities must comply with applicable 

requirements of section 5(d) in MEBA, 

‘‘Management Standards for a Facility,’’ 

including the requirements of the Solid 

Waste Disposal Act as amended by 

RCRA, and other state-specific 

permitting requirements. Consistent 

with the Supplement Analysis prepared 

in 2019 but updated to account for 

accumulation of elemental mercury 

since then, the SEIS–II evaluates the 

potential environmental impacts of an 

estimated inventory of up to 7,000 

metric tons of elemental mercury that 

could require management and storage 

during the 40-year period of analysis. 

After completion of DOE’s Proposed 

Action, DOE would establish the fee for 

long-term management and storage of 

elemental mercury through a 

rulemaking conducted pursuant to the 

Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 

551 et seq.). DOE would evaluate the 

potential environmental impacts of the 

rulemaking in accordance with NEPA 

implementing procedures at 10 CFR part 

1021 at that time. 

IV. Proposed Alternatives 

The Mercury Storage SEIS–II 

evaluates the potential environmental 

impacts associated with implementation 

of the Proposed Action in existing 

facilities at the following reasonable 

alternative locations: 

• Hawthorne Army Depot in 

Hawthorne, Nevada; 

• WCS in Andrews County, Texas; 

• Bethlehem Apparatus in 

Bethlehem, Pennsylvania; 

• Perma-Fix Diversified Scientific 

Services, Inc., in Kingston, Tennessee; 

• Veolia North America in Gum 

Springs, Arkansas; and 

• Clean Harbors (facilities in 

Pecatonica, Illinois; Greenbrier, 

Tennessee; and Tooele, Utah). 

DOE has also updated the analysis of 

the No-Action Alternative. 

For each of the above alternative 

locations, the Mercury Storage SEIS–II 

provides an evaluation of the potential 

environmental impacts for the following 

resource areas: land use and ownership, 

and visual resources; geology, soils, and 

geologic hazards; water resources; air 

quality and noise; ecological resources; 

cultural and paleontological resources; 

site infrastructure; waste management; 

occupational and public health and 

safety (including normal operations, 

facility accidents, transportation, and 

intentional destructive acts); 

socioeconomics; and environmental 

justice. The SEIS–II also includes a 

description of reasonably foreseeable 

environmental trends and planned 

actions within the region of influence 

for each alternative site. The SEIS–II 

evaluates the potential cumulative 

impacts of actions that have a 

reasonably close causal relationship or 

that occur at the same time and place as 

the Proposed Action. 

In the 2011 Mercury Storage EIS and 

the 2013 Mercury Storage SEIS, DOE 

identified the WCS alternative as the 

preferred alternative. DOE no longer has 

a specific preferred alternative. 

However, DOE does prefer one or more 

of the alternative locations with existing 

commercial facilities because selection 

of one or more of these facilities would 

best address DOE’s schedule urgency 

established by MEBA. 

V. Public Participation in the NEPA 

Process 

DOE has published the Draft Mercury 

Storage SEIS–II on the internet at: 

https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis0423-s2-supplemental-environmentalimpact-statement-long-termmanagement-and-storage. Additionally, 

DOE has scheduled two web-based 

public hearings to allow DOE to present 

information about the Draft SEIS–II and 

to receive oral comments from the 

public. The first hearing will be held on 

August 2, 2022, from 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 

p.m. EDT. The second hearing will be 

held on August 4, 2022, from 1:00 p.m. 

to 3:00 p.m. EDT. Registration details 

are included below and are also 

available on the DOE website for longterm management and storage of 

elemental mercury (https://

www.energy.gov/em/long-termmanagement-and-storage-elementalmercury). If you are joining the webbased public hearing via the internet 

(the preferred approach), use the link 

below to log in to the Zoom Meeting 

Room. If you are joining the web-based 

public hearing via phone, dial the 

number below and follow the prompts. 

Documents and the presentation for the 

public hearing will be made available 

on the DOE website for long-term 

management and storage of elemental 

mercury (https://www.energy.gov/em/ 

long-term-management-and-storageelemental-mercury). Persons who wish 

to provide oral comments at the hearing 

may sign up either before the hearing by 

submitting a request to Julia.Donkin@

em.doe.gov (preferred approach) or 

during the meeting. To join the first 

web-based public hearing (August 2, 

2022) via Zoom Meeting Room: https:// 

em-doe.zoomgov.com/j/1608025687?

pwd=Zndsbkp6THA4V2lFdXE3ZGE

xclF6Zz09 (copy and paste into web 

browser). 

To join the second web-based public 

hearing (August 4, 2022) via Zoom 

Meeting Room: https://emdoe.zoomgov.com/j/1608025687?

pwd=Zndsbkp6THA4V2lFdXE3ZGE

xclF6Zz09 (copy and paste into web 

browser). 

Signing Authority 

This document of the U.S. 

Department of Energy was signed on 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 130 / Friday, July 8, 2022 / Notices 40833 

June 27, 2022, by William I. White, 

Senior Advisor for Environmental 

Management, pursuant to delegated 

authority from the Secretary of Energy. 

That document with the original 

signature and date is maintained by 

DOE. For administrative purposes only, 

and in compliance with the 

requirements of the Office of the Federal 

Register, the undersigned DOE Federal 

Register Liaison Officer has been 

authorized to sign and submit the 

document in electronic format for 

publication, as an official document of 

the U.S. Department of Energy. This 

administrative process in no way alters 

the legal effect of this document upon 

publication in the Federal Register. 

Signed in Washington, DC, on June 30, 

2022. 

Treena V. Garrett, 

Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. 

Department of Energy. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14388 Filed 7–7–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings #1 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following Complaints and 

Compliance filings in EL Dockets: 

Docket Numbers: EL22–72–000. 

Applicants: Mercer County Solar 

Project, LLC v. PJM Interconnection, 

LLC. 

Description: Complaint Requesting 

Fast Track Processing of Mercer County 

Solar Project, LLC. 

Filed Date: 6/28/22. 

Accession Number: 20220628–5159. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/18/22. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric rate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: ER10–1821–022. 

Applicants: Goshen Phase II LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Northwest Region of 

Goshen Phase II LLC. 

Filed Date: 6/30/22. 

Accession Number: 20220630–5340. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–2126–006. 

Applicants: Idaho Power Company. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Northwest Region and 

Notice of Change in Status of Idaho 

Power Company. 

Filed Date: 6/30/22. 

Accession Number: 20220630–5332. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–2575–011. 

Applicants: Watson Cogeneration 

Company. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Southwest Region of 

Watson Cogeneration Company. 

Filed Date: 7/1/22. 

Accession Number: 20220701–5067. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/30/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–2756–010; 

ER10–2264–010; ER10–2359–011. 

Applicants: Sunrise Power Company, 

LLC, Long Beach Generation LLC, 

Griffith Energy LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Southwest Region of 

Griffith Energy LLC, et al. 

Filed Date: 6/30/22. 

Accession Number: 20220630–5337. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–2757–009; 

ER11–3051–005. 

Applicants: Macho Springs Power I, 

LLC, Arlington Valley, LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Southwest Region of 

Arlington Valley, LLC, et al. 

Filed Date: 6/30/22. 

Accession Number: 20220630–5336. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER10–3310–015; 

ER18–53–003. 

Applicants: CXA La Paloma, LLC, 

New Harquahala Generating Company, 

LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Southwest Region of 

New Harquahala Generating Company, 

LLC, et al. 

Filed Date: 6/30/22. 

Accession Number: 20220630–5328. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER12–2178–016; 

ER10–2192–039; ER13–1536–023; 

ER10–2178–039. 

Applicants: Constellation NewEnergy, 

Inc., Constellation Energy Generation, 

LLC, Constellation Energy Commodities 

Group Maine, LLC, AV Solar Ranch 1, 

LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Southwest Region of 

AV Solar Ranch 1, LLC, et al. 

Filed Date: 6/30/22. 

Accession Number: 20220630–5335. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER13–1865–005. 

Applicants: Tesoro Refining & 

Marketing Company LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Southwest Region of 

Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company 

LLC. 

Filed Date: 7/1/22. 

Accession Number: 20220701–5074. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/30/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER14–1140–002; 

ER13–1069–015; ER12–2381–012; 

ER10–1484–026. 

Applicants: Shell Energy North 

America (US), L.P., MP2 Energy NE 

LLC, MP2 Energy LLC, Inspire Energy 

Holdings, LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Southwest Region of 

Inspire Energy Holdings, LLC, et al. 

Filed Date: 6/30/22. 

Accession Number: 20220630–5339. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER14–1656–012. 

Applicants: CSOLAR IV West, LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Southwest Region of 

CSOLAR IV West, LLC. 

Filed Date: 6/30/22. 

Accession Number: 20220630–5334. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER16–2368–001; 

ER16–1888–004. 

Applicants: Tidal Energy Marketing 

Inc., New Creek Wind LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Northeast Region of 

New Creek Wind LLC, et al. 

Filed Date: 6/30/22. 

Accession Number: 20220630–5333. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER18–1778–001. 

Applicants: CFE International LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Southwest Region of 

CFE International LLC. 

Filed Date: 6/30/22. 

Accession Number: 20220630–5330. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER18–2033–002; 

ER21–963–002. 

Applicants: Silverstrand Grid, LLC, 

Saavi Energy Solutions, LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for the Southwest Region of 

Saavi Energy Solutions, LLC, et al. 

Filed Date: 6/30/22. 

Accession Number: 20220630–5329. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 

Docket Numbers: ER21–1297–003; 

ER13–1562–011; ER20–1910–003; 

ER20–1911–003; ER20–1915–004; 

ER20–1916–004; ER21–1502–001; 

ER21–1503–001; ER12–1931–012; 

ER10–2504–013; ER12–610–013; ER13– 

338–011; ER19–2260–001. 

Applicants: Valentine Solar, LLC, 

Shiloh IV Lessee, LLC, Shiloh III Lessee, 

LLC, Shiloh Wind Project 2, LLC, 

Pacific Wind Lessee, LLC, Maverick 

Solar 7, LLC, Maverick Solar 6, LLC, 

Maverick Solar 4, LLC, Maverick Solar, 

LLC, Desert Harvest II LLC, Desert 

Harvest, LLC, Catalina Solar Lessee, 

LLC, BigBeau Solar, LLC. 

Description: Triennial Market Power 

Analysis for Southwest Region of Big 

Beau Solar, LLC, et al. 

Filed Date: 6/29/22. 

Accession Number: 20220629–5193. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 8/29/22. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1