alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5297 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain tirebuilding machines used in 

the manufacture of extra-wide pneumatic truck and automobile tires, 

and parts and accessories thereof. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain tirebuilding machines used in the manufacture of extra-wide pneumatic 

truck and automobile tires, and parts and accessories 

thereof. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN TIREBUILDING MACHINES USED IN 

4 THE MANUFACTURE OF EXTRA-WIDE PNEU5 MATIC TRUCK AND AUTOMOBILE TIRES, AND 

6 PARTS AND ACCESSORIES THEREOF. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5297 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Machines, including but not 

limited to post systems, feeder systems, reels, conveying 

equipment, and controlling 

machinery, of a kind used for 

building truck and automobile tires, capable of producing tires having a tread 

width of more than 450 mm 

(provided for in subheading 

8477.51.00), and parts and 

accessories thereof ................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

7 (c) RETROACTIVE APPLICATION.—Notwithstanding 

8 section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) 

9 or any other provision of law, upon proper request filed 

10 with U.S. Customs and Border Protection before the 90th 

11 day after the date of the enactment of this Act, any entry, 

12 or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, of any 

13 good— 

14 (1) that was made on or after January 1, 2008, 

15 and before the 15th day after the date of the enact16 ment of this Act; and 

17 (2) with respect to which there would have no 

18 duty if the amendment made by subsection (a) ap19 plied to such entry or withdrawal, 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5297 IH

1 shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amendment 

2 applied to such entry or withdrawal. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2016196EN.01005601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 21.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 196/56 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1178 of 10 June 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on the clearing obligation

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 195 of 20 July 2016](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2016_195_R_TOC)
)

On page 8, Article 3(1)(b):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | 9 July 2017 for counterparties in Category 2;’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | 9 August 2017 for counterparties in Category 2;’; |

on page 8, Article 3(1)(d):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(d) | 9 July 2019 for counterparties in Category 4.’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(d) | 9 August 2019 for counterparties in Category 4.’; |

on page 8, Article 3(2)(a):

for:

‘
9 July 2019 ...’,

read:

‘
9 August 2019 ...’;

on page 9, Article 4(2)(b):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | 3 years for contracts entered into or novated 9 October 2016 that belong to the classes in Table 2 set out in Annex I;’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(b) | 3 years for contracts entered into or novated before 9 October 2016 that belong to the classes in Table 2 set out in Annex I;’. |

---
Air Force

Army

Navy/Marines

Other Defense

22%

15%

54%

9%

$1.3 $1.3 $1.2 $1.1 $1.2 $1.1

$1.4 $1.5

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

81%

3%

15%

0%

Construcon: 1%

Research and

 Development: 4%

Service: 14%

Supplies and

 Equipment: 81%

Acve Duty: 2% Civilian: 13%

Naonal Guard/

Reserve: 85%

Rockwell Collins

Data Link Soluons

American Ordnance

Cobham

HNI Corp.

Dubuque Barge and Fleeng Service

Carver Pump Company

United Technologies

Lang Construcon Group

Cook Inlet Region

$853.9 M

$198.0 M

$68.6 M

$34.6 M

$15.4 M

$9.0 M

$8.2 M

$6.9 M

$5.6 M

$4.4 M

Polk

Woodbury

Linn

Sco

Black Hawk

Johnson

Boone

Dubuque

Webster

Des Moines

County

4,940

1,411

801

763

631

588

445

343

271

222

Total*

90

ND

ND

ND

25

45

ND

ND

ND

ND

Acve Duty

   Military

752

284

96

167

72

26

62

32

38

36

Civilian

 FISCAL YEAR 2017

IOWA

   DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Con ense Con ense Contractors (M=millions)

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

   DEFENSE PERSONNEL

Allocaons, By Type

Allocaons, By Service

$314.0 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

$314.0 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,809

TOTAL PERSONNEL

12,809

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Loc sonnel Loc sonnel Locaons

*Total also includes unif al also includes uniformed Na ormed Naonal Guar onal Guard and R d and Reserve units. e units.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

46 Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017
AF Guard Army Actve Army Guard

IOWA

#38 #41 0.4% $568 #34 #41 #47

$1.8 B

SPENT IN STATE

0.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S.

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $1.5 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

12,809 NUMBER

OF PERSONNEL

$0.3 B PERSONNEL

SPENDING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)(M=millions) (M=millions)

Linn County

$952.1 M

Des Moines County

$78.3 M

Scot County

$50.8 M

Polk County

$28.9 M

Muscatne County

$24.5 M

Dubuque County

$7.2 M

Lucas County

$6.6 M

Johnson County

$4.5 M

Woodbury County

$3.9 M

Potawatamie County

$3.3 M

Linn

Des Moines

Polk Scot

Muscatne

Dubuque

Lucas

Johnson

Woodbury

Potawatamie

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)(M=millions) (M=millions)

Polk County

$144.8 M

Woodbury County

$42.7 M

Scot County

$18.8 M

Linn County

$15.2 M

Black Hawk County

$13.4 M

Boone County

$12.2 M

Johnson County

$11.9 M

Des Moines County

$7.9 M

Webster County

$5.6 M

Dubuque County

$5.1 M

Polk

Woodbury

Scot

Linn

Black Hawk

Boone

Johnson

Des Moines

Webster Dubuque

Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017 47
Dianne G. NICKLES v. Thomas B. KORBIN.

No. 662P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Dianne G. Nickles, Pro Se.

Karen Strom Talley, Greensboro, for Thomas B. Korbin.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 30th day of November 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
STATE v. FINNEY

No. COA05-850

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Buncombe (01CRS7899).

Case reported without published opinion. Remanded for resentencing.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 544 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
                                H. R. 544

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2007

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To designate the United States courthouse at South Federal Place in 
    Santa Fe, New Mexico, as the ``Santiago E. Campos United States 
                             Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at South Federal Place in Santa Fe, 
New Mexico, shall be known and designated as the ``Santiago E. Campos 
United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Santiago E. 
Campos United States Courthouse''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 6, 2007.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
##### 



1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 of
Inhibitex, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15(d)-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: May 10, 2006/s/ Russell H. PlumbVice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 29
Cheryl W. MAYO v. Frank E. MAYO.

No. 529P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

H. Paul Averette, Brevard, for Cheryl W. Mayo.

Charles W. McKeller, for Frank E. Mayo.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of September 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5506 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey 

City, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Bishop Ralph E. Brower Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5506 EH

1 SECTION 1. BISHOP RALPH E. BROWER POST OFFICE 

2 BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. 

5 Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, shall be known and des6 ignated as the ‘‘Bishop Ralph E. Brower Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Bishop Ralph E. 

12 Brower Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5506 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostRalph E. Brower Post Office Building’’. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Bishop al Service located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr.
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5472 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 2650 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Street, 

Indianapolis, Indiana, as the ‘‘Julia M. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5472 EH

1 SECTION 1. JULIA M. CARSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 2650 Dr. Martin Luther King 

4 Jr. Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, shall be known and des5 ignated as the ‘‘Julia M. Carson Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Julia M. Carson Post 

10 Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 9, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5472 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Post-

‘‘Julia M. Carson Post Office Building’’. King Jr. Street, Indianapolis, Indiana, as the al Service located at 2650 Dr. Martin Luther
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                       176
<INVENTORY>                                      1,629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,887
<PP&E>                                           4,703
<DEPRECIATION>                                     298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,690
<BONDS>                                          4,909
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,273
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,766)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,106
<SALES>                                          5,713
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,952
<CGS>                                            2,657
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,332
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    19
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    260
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                260
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       260
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, David A. Chaput,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/Aof Idaho General Mines, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13/A(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of Idaho General Mines, Inc.

Dated: June 5,2007
|        | By:    | /s/ David A. Chaput           |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | David A. Chaput               |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer       |
|   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |

 

----
In the Matter of: Appeal of Richard S. PACULA from the decision of the Brunswick County Board of Equalization and Review concerning real property taxation for tax year 2003. appealed by Richard S. PACULA.

No. 682P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Richard S. Pacula, Pro Se.

Jana L. Berg, Assistant County Attorney, for Wake County/PTC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Appellant (Richard Pacula) on the 8th day of December 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of December 2005 by Appellant (Richard Pacula) to Quash Appellee's (Brunswick County) Motion to Dismiss, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing WorldWide, Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Marvin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/ JAMES MARVIN
----------------------
James Marvin
Chief Financial Officer
May 3, 2006
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Amendment to annual report of SeaChange
International, Inc. (the “ Company ”) on Form
10-K/A for the year ended January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”), I, Kevin
M. Bisson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:




(1)
            
            The
      Company’s Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and(2)
            
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ KEVINM. BISSONKevin M. BissonChief Financial Officer, Senior Vice
      President,Finance and
    Administration,Treasurer and
  Secretary


June 1, 2010




This certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission with this Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.




---
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
                      UNDER THE 1996 COGNIZANT CORPORATION
                  NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

This non-qualified stock option agreement (the "Award Agreement") confirms the
non-qualified stock option award (the "Award") made on November 15, 1996 by The
Compensation and Benefits Committee (the "Committee") of the Board of Directors
of COGNIZANT CORPORATION (the "Company") under the 1996 Cognizant Corporation
Non-Employee Directors' Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan") to:

                         Director (the "Participant")

of non-qualified stock options to purchase 7,000 shares of the Company's common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Options"), prior to November 15, 2006, at
an Option price of $33.375 per share.

The Options are not intended to be incentive stock options within the meaning of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). These
Options may be exercised in whole or in part, from time to time, on or after the
dates indicated below as to that number of shares originally subject hereto set
forth opposite such date, plus any shares as to which these Options could have
been exercised earlier but were not so exercised.

                    Date                       Number of Shares
                    ----                       ----------------
             November 15, 1997                       1,166
             November 15, 1998                       1,166
             November 15, 1999                       1,167
             November 15, 2000                       1,167
             November 15, 2001                       1,167
             November 15, 2002                       1,167


The Options are issued in accordance with and are subject to the terms of the
Plan, which Plan is incorporated herein by reference, and are exercisable only
in accordance with the terms of this Award Agreement and the Plan. In accordance
with the terms of the Plan, except as waived by the Committee, these Options are
not transferable otherwise than by will or the laws of descent and distribution
and are exercisable during the lifetime of the Participant only by the
Participant.


<PAGE>


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Cognizant Corporation has caused this Award Agreement to be
executed in duplicate by its officer thereunto duly authorized.


                                        COGNIZANT CORPORATION


                                        By _________________________________
                                               SVP & Corporate Secretary


The undersigned hereby accepts and agrees to all the terms and provisions of the
foregoing Award Agreement and acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Prospectus
related to the Plan.



--------------------                    -----------------------------------
       Date                             Directors