alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Aaron Richard ESTES.

No. 28P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Aaron Richard Estes, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 24th day of February 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Cabarrus County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
STATE v. SANFORD

No. COA05-41

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed November 1, 2005

Certification Date November 21, 2005

Appeal from Cleveland (00CRS8143).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
# L_2017080EN.01003201.xml

| 25.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 80/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 80/32

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2017/562

of 21 March 2017

appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Portuguese Republic, of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Portuguese Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Rodrigo VASCONCELOS DE OLIVEIRA, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Rodrigo VASCONCELOS DE OLIVEIRA,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Mr Rui Jorge DA SILVA LEITE DE BETTENCOURT, Secretário Regional Adjunto da Presidência para as Relações Externas do Governo Regional dos Açores. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Rui Jorge DA SILVA LEITE DE BETTENCOURT, Secretário Regional Adjunto da Presidência para as Relações Externas do Governo Regional dos Açores.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 21 March 2017.

For the Council

The President

E. SCICLUNA

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6548

RONNIE C. GREEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN PATE, Warden of the Allendale

Correctional Institution; CHARLES M. 

CONDON, Attorney General of the State 

of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-02-2022-4-26)

Submitted: July 29, 2004 Decided: August 4, 2004

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie C. Green, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie C. Green seeks to appeal from the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Green has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
STATE v. EVANS

No. COA05-694

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS28545, 04CRS60629).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in part; remanded for correction of clerical error; remanded for resentencing.
Summary of named executive officer salary increases.



 EXHIBIT 10(d) 
  
 Summary of named executive officer salary increases. 
  
 On July 14, 2005, at a regular meeting of the Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, increases to the
annual base salaries of the following named executive officers were approved, effective July 1, 2005, after a review of performance and competitive market data: 
  


						
	 Name and Position

	  	Year

	  	Base Salary


	 Ricardo E. Belda
 Executive Vice President—European Region
	  	2005
2004	  	$
$	500,000
470,000
			
	 Bernt Reitan
 Executive Vice President and Group President, Global Primary Products
	  	2005
2004	  	$
$	540,000
470,000

  
 Information related to the other
elements of total compensation for these named executive officers was previously disclosed in the 2005 Proxy Statement filed February 22, 2005. 
  

 35
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT THOMAS MAULDIN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-458 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________ ) Opinion filed August 29, 2014. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Michael E. Raiden, Judge. Crystal McBee Frusciante, Jupiter, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.

LaROSE, Judge.

Thomas Mauldin appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. He is serv ing a forty-year prison

sentence for lewd and lascivious molestation of a victim less t han twelve years old. See § 800.04(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2008). We affirmed his judgment an d sentence on direct appeal. Mauldin v. State, 61 So. 3d 1125 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (t able). Our mandate issued on or about June 15, 2011.- 2 - On June 6, 2013, Mr. Mauldin, through counsel, signed and read ied for mailing his motion for postconviction relief to the clerk of th e court for filing. 1 Finding the motion facially sufficient, the postconviction court ordered th e State to respond. Adopting the State's response, t he postconviction court denied Mr. Mauldin's motion on

the merits. 2 We affirm the postconviction court's order as to claims 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Because claims 1 and 3 were legally insufficient, however, the postconviction court should have given Mr. Mauldin an opportunity to amend those cla ims. See Spera v. State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm in p art, reverse in part, and remand with directions for the postconviction court to allow Mr . Mauldin the opportunity, if he can in good faith, to amend claims 1 and 3. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SILBERMAN and VILLANT I, JJ., Concur.

1 Although the State and the postconviction court deemed the moti on untimely, we cannot agree. The la st day on which Mr. Mauldin c ould have filed his motion was on or about June 15, 2013. His counsel signed the m otion on June 6, 2013, as reflected in the certificate of service. In a motion for re hearing entered after denial of Mr. Mauldin's motion on the merits as well as for untimeliness, counsel submitted an affidavit attesting to her having mailed the motion on June 7, 2013. Counsel has no explanation as to why the motion was not docketed until June 25 , 2013. It is clear, however, that Mr. Mauldin retain ed counsel to represent him for postconviction purposes. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b)(3) (extending time whe n retained counsel, through neglect, fails to timely file postconviction motion). We treat the motion as timely filed.

2 Interestingly, the postconviction court initially concluded tha t Mr. Mauldin's motion asserted facially sufficient claims for relief . Upon receipt of the State's response, the postconviction court apparently changed its mind and concluded that some of the claims were facially deficient.
# L_2013117DE.01002401.xml

| 27.4.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 117/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 117/24

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 748/2012 der Kommission vom 3. August 2012 zur Festlegung der Durchführungsbestimmungen für die Erteilung von Lufttüchtigkeits- und Umweltzeugnissen für Luftfahrzeuge und zugehörige Produkte, Bau- und Ausrüstungsteile sowie für die Zulassung von Entwicklungs- und Herstellungsbetrieben

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 224 vom 21. August 2012
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 224 vom 21. August 2012

Seite 5, Artikel 4 Absatz 2 Buchstabe c:

anstatt:

„gegebenenfalls beim Mitgliedstaat in Kraft waren. ###the applicable certification basis shall be that established by the JAA or, where applicable, the Member State at the date of application for the supplemental type-certificate or the major change approval;###“

muss es heißen:

„Als Zulassungsgrundlage gilt die von der JAA oder gegebenenfalls vom Mitgliedstaat festgelegte Grundlage zum Zeitpunkt des Antrags auf Genehmigung der ergänzenden Musterzulassung oder Genehmigung der großen Änderung.“

---
# L_2012347EN.01004302.xml

| 15.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 347/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 347/43

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 601/2012 of 21 June 2012 on the monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions pursuant to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 181 of 12 July 2012
  )

On page 41, in Article 25(1), on the sixth line:

for:

‘
  3 664 t CO2/t C,’,

2

read:

‘3,664 t CO2/t C,’;

2

on page 45, in Article 36(3), on the third line:

for:

‘
  3 664 t CO2/t C.’,

2

read:

‘3,664 t CO2/t C.’.

2

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5410 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3-oxido-5-oxo-4- 

propionylcyclohex-3-enecarboxylic acid calcium salt. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2008 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3-oxido5-oxo-4-propionylcyclohex-3-enecarboxylic acid calcium salt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 3-OXIDO-5-OXO-4-PROPIONYLCYCLOHEX-3- 

4 ENECARBOXYLIC ACID CALCIUM SALT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.03 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 3-oxido-5-oxo-4-propionylcyclohex-3-enecarboxylic acid 

8 calcium salt) is amended by striking the date in the effec9 tive period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5410 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of MarkWest Hydrocarbon, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Donald C. Heppermann, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/DONALD C. HEPPERMANNDonald C. Heppermann
Senior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|March 29, 2003                                                                                          | 



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.1




The following certification is provided by the undersigned President and Principal Executive Officer of Centrue Financial Corporation on the basis of such officer’s knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




CERTIFICATION




In connection with the Annual Report of Centrue Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2010 (the “Report”), I, Thomas A. Daiber, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Thomas A. DaiberName: Thomas A. DaiberTitle: President andPrincipal Executive OfficerDate: March 26, 2010
UNITED STATES CO URT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. CHARLTON VAUGHN, a/k/a Money, a/k/a Lil’ Money, Defendant - Appellant. No. 14-1275 (D.C. No. 1:12-CR-00048-WJM-12) (D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before LUCERO , HARTZ , and McHUGH , Circuit Judges.

After accepting a plea agreement that incl uded a waiver of his right to appeal, Charlton Vaughn pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to di stribute cocaine or

base cocaine. Notwithstandi ng the appeal waiver, he file d a pro se notice of appeal and counsel was appointed to represent Mr . Vaughn on appeal. The government has

moved to enforce the waiver. See United States v. Hahn , 359 F.3d 1315, 1328 (10th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (per curiam). The gov ernment has also filed a motion to keep

* This panel has determined that oral ar gument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctr ines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It ma y be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32. 1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### November 21, 2014

Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court- 2 - Mr. Vaughn’s plea agreement, at tached as an exhibit to the motion to enforce, under

seal. Mr. Vaughn’s lawyer has filed a re sponse to the government’s motion to

enforce in which he states that “Appellant Vaughn has no objection to the Government’s Motion to Enforce An Appeal Waiver.” Resp. at 2. Moreover, Mr. Vaughn does not object to the motion to seal. The motion to enforce is granted and this matter is dismisse d. We also grant the government’s motion to file Mr. Vaughn’s plea agre ement under seal.

Entered for the Court Per Curiam
Freddie Lee DIXON, Sr., and Mabel Dixon v. Thomas L. HILL, Administrator of the Estate of John Barber, and Palmetto Born Again Church of Christ (Apostolic), Inc., a/k/a Palmetto Deliverance Church.

No. 667P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

William L. Davis, III, Lumberton, for Thomas L. Hill.

Scott T. Slusser, for Mabel Dixon.

R. Clarke Speaks, Wilmington, for Freddie Lee Dixon, Sr.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of December 2005 by Defendant (Palmetto) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby *620certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 17, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130998 & (26) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

HENRY BLACK, RON PALMER, DELIA Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, DeLaFUENTE-DURHAM, DON PETROW, Justices JEFF SHEEHAN, NATALIE PACHOLUK,

GUADALUPE ARBOLEYA, MARIANNE 

KORNYLO, and CAROL LINKE , 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 130998 

 COA: 268350 

Oakland CC: 2004-058461-CL 

DAIMLERCHRYSLER SERVICES NORTH 

AMERICA, L.L.C., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we 

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for clarification of its order. Specifically, 

the Court of Appeals shall state whether it intended to vacate the Oakland Circuit Court’s 

order denying defendant’s motion to strike and to order the trial court to engage in an 

MRE 702 inquiry regarding plaintiffs’ proposed expert testimony before issuing a new 

ruling on defendant’s motion to strike. On the Court’s own motion, we further ORDER 

that the proceedings in the Oakland Circuit Court are stayed pending the completion of 

this appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may 

modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being 

vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

t0517 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 17, 2006 

Clerk
STATE v. WHITESIDES

No. COA05-67.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Gaston (03CRS5588, 03CRS55889, 03CRS11597, 03CRS55948).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. Curly JACOBS.

No. 617A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 7, 2005.

C. Scott Holmes, for Curly Jacobs.

L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of November 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed pending the determination of the State's Petition for Discretionary Review by order of the Court in conference this the 7th day of November 2005."
Exhibit 32.1 and 32.2



Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63

of Title 18 of the United States Code



I, William M.
Goodyear, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Navigant Consulting, Inc., and I, Ben W. Perks, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Navigant Consulting, Inc., certify that (i) the SEC Form 10-K as of and for the period ended
December 31, 2004 (Form 10-K), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in said Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Navigant Consulting, Inc.



/s/    WILLIAM M.
GOODYEARWilliam M. Goodyear Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer March 10, 2005/s/    BEN W. PERKSBen W. Perks Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer March 10, 2005
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS ELIAS-ZENDEJAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 12-71082

Agency No. A200-244-571

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 24, 2013** 

Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Jose Luis Elias-Zendejas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Khan v. Holder, 584 F.3d

FILED

AUG 01 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-71082

773, 776 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for

review.

The BIA properly determined that Elias-Zenedejas’ conviction 

for inflicting corporal injury on the mother of his children, in violation of

California Penal Code § 273.5, is a crime of domestic violence under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1227(a)(2)(E)(i) that renders him statutorily ineligible for cancellation of

removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(C); Banuelos-Ayon v. Holder, 611 F.3d

1080, 1083-86 (9th Cir. 2010); Vasquez-Hernandez v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1053,

1056-57 (9th Cir. 2010) (petty offense exception available in removal context does

not apply to petitioner’s eligibility for cancellation of removal based on his

conviction under California Penal Code § 273.5).

We lack jurisdiction to consider Elias-Zendejas’ claim that the IJ should

have granted him a continuance because he failed to raise that claim before the

BIA and thereby failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Tijani v.

Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.