alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
___ __, 2005

EarlyBirdCapital, Inc.
275 Madison Avenue
Suite 1203
New York, New York 10016

                  Re: Jaguar Acquisition Corporation.
                      -------------------------------
Gentlemen:

                  This letter will confirm the agreement of the undersigned to
purchase warrants ("Warrants") of Jaguar Acquisition Corporation ("Company")
included in the units ("Units") being sold in the Company's initial public
offering ("IPO") upon the terms and conditions set forth herein. Each Unit is
comprised of one share of Common Stock and two Warrants. The shares of Common
Stock and Warrants will not be separately tradable until 90 days after the
effective date of the Company's IPO unless EarlyBirdCapital, Inc. ("EBC")
informs the Company of its decision to allow earlier separate trading.

                  The undersigned agrees that this letter agreement constitutes
an irrevocable order for EBC or an independent broker/dealer designated by EBC
(in either case, the "Broker") to purchase for the undersigned's account within
the ten month period commencing on the date separate trading of the Warrants
commences ("Separation Date") up to _______ Warrants at market prices not to
exceed $0.70 per Warrant ("Maximum Warrant Purchase"). The Broker agrees to fill
such order in such amounts and at such times as it may determine, in its sole
discretion, during the ten month period commencing on the Separation Date (such
period is hereinafter referred to as the "Purchase Period"). EBC further agrees
that it will not charge the undersigned any fees and/or commissions with respect
to such purchase obligation.

                  This letter is one of several similar letters (the "Other
Letters") with _________, ________, _______, ________, _________ and _________
(collectively, the "Other Founders") obligating the Other Founders to similarly
purchase Warrants. The Broker agrees that at any time it purchases Warrants
under this letter or under any of the Other Letters, it will use reasonable
commercial efforts to purchase Warrants for the account of the undersigned and
the Other Founders, pro rata, on the basis of the Maximum Warrant Purchase set
forth herein and in each of the Other Letters.

                  The Broker will promptly notify the undersigned of any
purchase of Warrants hereunder and under the Other Letters so that the
undersigned can comply with applicable reporting requirements on a timely basis.

                  The undersigned agrees that he shall not sell or transfer the
Warrants until after the consummation of a merger, capital stock exchange, asset
acquisition or other similar business combination with an operating business and
acknowledges that, at the option of EBC, the certificates for such Warrants
shall contain a legend indicating such restriction on transferability.













                                           Very truly yours,



                                           -----------------------------------







ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:

EarlyBirdCapital Inc.


By:____________________________

[Independent Broker]


By:____________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5394 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5394

            To suspend temporarily the duty on Cobalt Boron.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on Cobalt Boron.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COBALT BORON.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Cobalt Boron (CAS   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          No. 68457-13-6)                                                    31/2011.......
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          8105.20.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
50 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

KENTUCKY

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

By Type

Service: 86%

Construction: 2%

Research and 

Development: 0%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 12%

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions B=billions)

Humana $3.4 B

Lockheed Martin $559.1 M

Bechtel Parsons Blue Grass, JV $244.6 M

Raytheon $165.1 M

Boeing $112.4 M

BAE Systems $79.5 M

SourceAmerica $43.8 M

Granite Construction $28.7 M

Spiral Solutions and Technologies $28.3 M

Bering Straits Native Corporation $27.4 M

$8.2

$5.5 $5.3 $5.1 $5.4 $5.7

$4.9

$6.1

21%

0%

1%

78%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.6 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

70,109

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

Military

Christian 39,652 36,525 2,928

Hardin 17,869 10,654 5,268

Jefferson 3,194 175 1,186

Madison 1,597 22 1,004

Franklin 1,242 37 367

Fayette 851 75 113

Boone 544 ND 20

Campbell 400 ND 28

Muhlenberg 351 ND 86

McCracken 266 ND 13

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 15%

Active Duty: 69%

Civilian: 16%

94%

1%

4%

1%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 51

Boone 

Franklin 

Fayette 

Jefferson 

Hardin 

Livingston 

Muhlenberg

Christian Madison

Boone 

Fayette 

Jefferson 

Hardin 

Christian Madison

Livingston

Christian County

$1.7 B

Hardin County

$621.8 M

Jefferson County 

$103.0 M

Madison County

$62.9 M

Franklin County

$34.1 M

Fayette County

$15.9 M

Muhlenberg County

$4.9 M

Boone County

$3.2 M

Campbell County

$2.9 M

Livingston County

$2.5 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billion) (M=millions)

Jefferson County

$3.1 B

Fayette County

$613.7 M

Christian County

$407.3 M

Hardin County

$302.9 M

Madison County

$270.6 M

Boone County

$46.5 M

Livingston County

$19.4 M

Menifee County

$18.7 M

Whitley County

$12.0 M

Taylor County

$10.8 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions)

#17

$7.5 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#10

3.7% OF STATE GDP

2.0%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$1,677

PER RESIDENT

#15

$4.9 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#14

70,109 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#14

$2.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 KENTUCKY

Campbell 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active

Taylor Menifee

 Whitley
Order entered October 23, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00770-CR

EX PARTE KEITH TEHDAI CHITSAKA

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-82291-2019

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 21, 2020 first motion to late file a 

motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief. Appellant has tendered his brief 

with the motion. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed on 

the date of this order. We ORDER the State’s brief filed within THIRTY DAYS 

of the date of this order.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
IN RE C.P.

No. COA05-734

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Cabarrus (01J153).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
NUMBER 13-08-00475-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

ANGELA HERNANDEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides 

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Angela Hernandez, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion to

dismiss her appeal because she no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and DISMISS the appeal. Having
2

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained,

and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this 25 day of September, 2008. th
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed January 17, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D23

- 1947

Lower Tribunal No. 2021

- 10559



### Hui Liu

, Appellant,

vs.



### Department of Health

, Appellee.

An Appeal from the State of Florida Department of Health, Board of

Massage Therapy

.

Hui Liu, in proper person.

Sarah Young Hodges, Chief Appellate Counsel (Tallahassee), for

appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES and HENDO N, JJ.

PER CURIA M.Hui Liu appeals the final order of the Florida Department of Health

revoking her massage therapist license. Liu does not challenge the order

on appeal, nor does she identify any possible error in the proceedings

below. We are unable to independently discer n any error because no

record on appeal has been filed and no transcript of proceedings have

been filed. We therefore affirm. See Williams v. Jessica L. Kerr, P.A. , 271

So. 3d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019).

Affirmed.

2
STATE of North Carolina v. Charles C. MOORE.

No. 260P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Charles C. Moore, Pro Se.

Lisa H. Graham, Assistant Attorney General, C. Branson Vickory, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of May 2005 by Defendant in this matter for further review of the Opinion of the N.C. Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals;

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."
# L_2013309EN.01005501.xml

| 19.11.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 309/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 309/55

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 566/2012 amending Regulation (EC) No 975/98 on denominations and technical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 169 of 29 June 2012
  )

On page 9:

for:

‘Article 1g

Issuing Member States shall update their national sides of regular coins in order to fully comply with this Regulation by 20 June 2062.’,

read:

‘Article 1g

Issuing Member States shall update their national sides of regular coins in order to fully comply with this Regulation by 20 July 2062.’;

On page 10:

for:

‘Article 1j

Articles 1c, 1d, 1e and 1h(2):

| (a) | shall not apply to circulation coins which have been issued or produced prior to 19 June 2012; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

shall not apply to circulation coins which have been issued or produced prior to 19 June 2012;

| (b) | shall, during a transitional period ending on 20 June 2062, not apply to the designs that are already legally in use on circulation coins on 19 June 2012. Circulation coins that have been issued or produced during the transitional period may remain legal tender without limit in time.’, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

shall, during a transitional period ending on 20 June 2062, not apply to the designs that are already legally in use on circulation coins on 19 June 2012. Circulation coins that have been issued or produced during the transitional period may remain legal tender without limit in time.’,

read:

‘Article 1j

Articles 1c, 1d and 1e and Article 1h(2):

| (a) | shall not apply to circulation coins which have been issued or produced prior to 19 July 2012; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

shall not apply to circulation coins which have been issued or produced prior to 19 July 2012;

| (b) | shall, during a transitional period ending on 20 July 2062, not apply to the designs that are already legally in use on circulation coins on 19 July 2012. Circulation coins that have been issued or produced during the transitional period may remain legal tender without limit in time.’. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

shall, during a transitional period ending on 20 July 2062, not apply to the designs that are already legally in use on circulation coins on 19 July 2012. Circulation coins that have been issued or produced during the transitional period may remain legal tender without limit in time.’.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5540 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5540

 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2008

  Mr. Sarbanes (for himself, Mr. Wittman of Virginia, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. 
Gilchrest, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. 
    Cummings, Mr. Ruppersberger, and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the 
    following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural 
                               Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 to provide for the 
continuing authorization of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails 
                                Network.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Gateways and 
Watertrails Network Continuing Authorization Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 502 of the Chesapeake Bay Initiative Act of 1998 (16 U.S.C. 
461 note; Public Law 105-312) is amending by striking subsection (c) 
and inserting the following:
    ``(c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated such sums as are necessary to carry out this section.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-23-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,684
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,684
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
NORMAN v. BRANNER

No. COA04-1032

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Mecklenburg (02CVS755).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

 

(1)          this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gander Mountain Company.

 
| Dated:  June 10, 2004 |                                                                          |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                                                          |
|                       |                                                                          |
|                       | /s/ Mark R.  Baker                                                            |   |
|                       | Mark R.  Baker                                                                |
|                       | *President and Chief Executive Officer*                                       |
|                       |                                                                          |
|                       |                                                                          |
|                       | /s/ Dennis  M. Lindahl                                                        |   |
|                       | Dennis M.  Lindahl                                                            |
|                       | *Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,  Secretary and Treasurer* |

 

----
**EXHIBIT32.4**

# **CERTIFICATIONBY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Visant Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul B. Carousso, principal financialofficer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 11, 2006 | /s/ Paul B.  Carousso         |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                  | Paul B. Carousso              |
|                  | *Vice  President, Finance*    |
|                  | *(Chief  Accounting Officer)* |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and this certification will not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the registrantspecifically incorporates it by reference.

----