alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5383 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,2-Dimethyl-3-(3- 

methylphenyl)proponal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,2-Dimethyl3-(3-methylphenyl)proponal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,2-DIMETHYL-3-(3-METHYLPHENYL)PROPONAL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.39 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 2,2-Dimethyl-3-(3-methylphenyl)proponal) is amended by 

7 striking the date in the effective period column and insert8 ing ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5383 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
CHERNEY v. NC ZOOLOGICAL PARK.

No. 606A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Michael W. Clark, Joe Thomas Knott, III, Raleigh, Kenneth R. Murphy, III, for Tinya Cherney.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of March 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Five Day Extension Allowed. Defendant (N.C. Zoological Park) shall have up to and including the 14th day of March 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of March 2005."
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Lee SANDERS.

No. 362A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 613 S.E.2d 708 (2005), reversing and remanding in part a judgment entered 9 January 2004 by Judge Mark E. Klass in Superior Court, Richmond County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 December 2005.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Robert K. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, for the State-appellant.

Anne Bleyman, Chapel Hill, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Marc L. Reisch           
|                        |  |  |  | Marc L. Reisch               
|                        |  |  |  | President and                
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                        |  |  |  | (principal executive officer)
Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated (the Company) of our report dated March 30, 2015 with respect to the balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders deficit and cash flows for the two years then ended included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, and to the reference to our firm under the heading Experts in the prospectus.







Liggett, Vogt & Webb, P.A.





LIGGETT, VOGT & WEBB, P.A.

Certified Public Accountants



Boynton Beach, Florida

March 30, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5506 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5506

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, as the 
            ``Bishop Ralph E. Brower Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2008

  Mr. Sires introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, as the 
            ``Bishop Ralph E. Brower Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BISHOP RALPH E. BROWER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 369 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive in Jersey City, New Jersey, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Bishop Ralph E. Brower Post 
Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Bishop 
Ralph E. Brower Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

 

(1)                                  this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gander Mountain Company.

 
| Dated:  September 13, 2004 |
|---------------------------------|
|                            |   |
|                            | /s/ Mark R. Baker |   |
|                            | Mark R. Baker |
|                            | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                            |   |
|                            |   |
|                            | /s/ Dennis M. Lindahl |   |
|                            | Dennis M. Lindahl |
|                            | *Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,* |
|                            | *Secretary and Treasurer* |
|                                 |  |  |  |
In re T.B. appealed by Tamieka M.

No. 598PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Peter Wood, for Tamieka M.

Tron Faulk, for Lee County Dept. of SS.

Eddie Winstead, Sanford, for Guardian Ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 29th day of November 2004 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,408,508              20,536,787
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,682,000               6,274,481
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,113,314               1,859,621
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,207,516              26,003,585
<PP&E>                                       3,892,721               7,740,908
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,699,930               3,190,725
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,443,363              30,707,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,294,175               3,909,392
<BONDS>                                      2,353,415                 355,494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,678                  11,948
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         1,595                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,424,253              26,072,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,443,363              30,707,919
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,177,138              17,350,384
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,884,709               3,408,360
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             246,655                 269,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                973,491               1,602,240
<INCOME-TAX>                                   395,342                 683,240
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            578,149                 919,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   578,149                 919,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10                     .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10                     .24


</TABLE>
STATE of NC v. KING.

No. 581P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the request filed on the 21st day of January 2005 by Defendant for Ruling:

> "Motion Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2005."
MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION

Headquarters

2901 West Truman Boulevard, P.O. Box 180, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102-0180
Telephone: 573/751-4115 @ Missouri Relay Center: 1-800-735-2966 (TDD)

JERRY M. CONLEY, Director

Reply to: Conservation Research Center
1110 South College Ave.
Columbia, MO 65201
Telephone: 573/882-9880
FAX:573/882-4517

August 9, 1999

Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Working Group
National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
WS 13446 SSMC4

1304 East-West Highway

Silver Spring, MD 20910

Dear Sirs or Madams:

Thave reviewed the series of documents that comprise the assessment of Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico,
Overall the assessment was comprehensive and very well donc. I only have a few comments:

1) While the assessment was unable to document impacts of hypoxia on fisheries, the primary parameter appears
to be impacts on commercial and sportfish harvest over time. One of the problems with documeating impacts on
fisheries is that the complex interactions between physical phenomena and fish are not nearly as well known in
the oceans as in fresh water. Unlike benthic organisms, fish can move out of areas where conditions are
becoming unsuitable. The document does show a significant negative impact on benthic organisms which
ultimately impacts fish. There is also a loss in productivity in the hypoxic zone, which ultimately will impact
fisheries on a larger scale should hypoxia worsen, which has been documented in other smaller seas. There
needs to be an effort to document impacts on non-commercial and sportfish in order to predict the reaction of fish
to reductions in benthic productivity.

2) Under Topic 2, the authors attribute the clearing up of Lake Eric to nutrient input reductions. While nutrient
reductions in the watershed may have played a role, the primary reason for the change in Lake Erie water quality
was the invasion and proliferation of zebra mussels during the mid-to-late 1980s.

3) Many of the recommendations (e.g. reduction of fertilizer application rates, altcring the timing of fertilizer
application, use of wetlands and buffers to reduce nutrient runoff to streams, better management of animal
manures) for reducing nutrient movement to the Gulf will improve water quality in Midwestern rivers and
streams. The hypoxia problem in the Gulf reinforces the need for nutrient reduction in these streams. The
ultimate impact will likely be a significant improvement in water quality and fisheries in these streams.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this assessment.

7a a ee

Alan C. Buchanan,
Environmental Services Biologist
aa
COMMISSION
ANITA B, GORMAN RANDY HERZOG RONALD J. STITES HOWARD L. WOOD

Kansas City St. Joseph Plattsburg Bonne Terre
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the " Company "), for the Fiscal yearend June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report "), I, Richard Damion, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that: (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and  (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Richard Damion Richard Damion Chairman of the Board Chief Financial Officer Dated:  October 12, 2010   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and will be retained by Newport Digital Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN RE A.L.W.A.

No. COA05-163.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Burke (03J66).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
Air Force

Army

Navy/Marines

Other Defense

8%

13%

53%

25%

$4.5 $4.4 $4.4 $4.6

$4.0 $4.1 $3.8 $3.7

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

25%

39%

23%

13%

Research and Construcon: 2%

 Development: 6%

Service: 75%

Supplies and

 Equipment: 18%

Acve Duty: 33%

Civilian: 51%

Naonal Guard/

Reserve: 16%

U.S. Department of Energy

Government of the United States

Booz Allen Hamilton

Alion Science and Technology

CSRA

Hewle‐Packard

RAND Corp.

AECOM

CACI

General Dynamics

$232.0 M

$204.8 M

$193.9 M

$160.2 M

$106.4 M

$85.2 M

$80.6 M

$80.1 M

$69.2 M

$66.2 M

District of Columbia

Locaon

23,673

Total*

7,939

Acve Duty

   Military

12,870

Civilian

 FISCAL YEAR 2017

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

   DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions)

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

   DEFENSE PERSONNEL

Allocaons, By Type

Allocaons, By Service

$2.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

25,225

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locaons

*Total also includes uniformed Naonal Guard and Reserve units.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

32 Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017
Navy Actve

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

#23 #7 1.5% $8,721 #21 #30 #18

$6.1 B

SPENT IN STATE

4.5% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S.

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $3.7 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

25,225 NUMBER

OF PERSONNEL

$2.4 B PERSONNEL

SPENDING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (B=billions)(B=billions)(B=billions)

District of Columbia

$3.8 B

District of Columbia

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (B=billions)(B=billions)(B=billions)

District of Columbia

$2.3 B

District of Columbia

Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017 33
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5431 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain cellular plastic sheets for use 

in filters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2008 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain cellular plastic 

sheets for use in filters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CELLULAR PLASTIC SHEETS FOR FILTERS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5431 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Cellular Plastic Sheets; of 

poly-tetrafluoroethylene 

measuring 10 microns to 140 

microns thick with pore size 

less than 0.15 microns which 

retain Polystyrene Latex 

beads of 0.15 microns or less, 

or of polyethersulfone, for use 

in manufacturing filters of 

heading 8421 (provided for in 

subheading 3921.19.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5262 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Reactive Blue 250. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Reactive 

Blue 250. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REACTIVE BLUE 250. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.90 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Reactive Blue 250) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5262 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------



CERTIFICATIONS

          The undersigned officer of Empire Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), as amended by this Amendment No. 1, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report
or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: December 1, 2006                  By:  /s/ Nathan Kahn
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Nathan Kahn,
                                           Chief Executive Officer and President

          The undersigned officer of Empire Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
hereby certifies that the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), as amended by this Amendment No. 1, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report
or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: December 1, 2006                  By:  /s/ Sandra Kahn
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Sandra Kahn,
                                           Chief Financial Officer


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STATE v. HOLMAN

No. COA04-962

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Durham (02CRS045019, 03CRS013559).

Case without published opinion. No error.