alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of I-Sector Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
H. Long, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the
Board, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a)
               or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
               operations of the Company.

                                          I-Sector Corporation.


Dated:  March 11, 2004                           /s/ James H. Long
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          James H. Long, Chief Executive
                                          Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
                                          Chairman of the Board
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5500 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5500

  To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to provide forbearance from 
 foreclosures of subprime mortgages in the determination of a consumer 
                 credit score, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 26, 2008

   Mr. Wynn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to provide forbearance from 
 foreclosures of subprime mortgages in the determination of a consumer 
                 credit score, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Foreclosure Credit Forgiveness Act 
of 2008''.

SEC. 2. FORBEARANCE IN CREATION OF CREDIT SCORE.

    (a) In General.--Section 609 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (15 
U.S.C. 1681g) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subsection:
    ``(h) Foreclosure on Subprime Not Taken Into Account for Credit 
Scores.--
            ``(1) In general.--A foreclosure on a subprime mortgage of 
        a consumer may not be taken into account by any person in 
        preparing or calculating the credit score (as defined in 
        subsection (f)(2)) for, or with respect to, the consumer.
            ``(2) Subprime defined.--The term `subprime mortgage' means 
        any consumer credit transaction secured by the principal 
        dwelling of the consumer that bears or otherwise meets the 
        terms and characteristics for such a transaction that the Board 
        has defined as a subprime mortgage.''.
    (b) Regulations.--The Board shall prescribe regulations defining a 
subprime mortgage for purposes of the amendment made by subsection (a) 
before the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect at the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date of 
the enactment of this Act and shall apply without regard to the date of 
the foreclosure.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. MORTON

No. COA05-257

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Stanly (02CRS54051, 02CRS54052).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# C_2017339EN.01000301.xml

| 10.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 9 October 2017

appointing an alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for France

(2017/C 339/04)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 of the Council of 26 May 1975 on the creation of a European Foundation for the improvement of living and working conditions (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

1

Having regard to the lists of nominations for appointment submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States and by the employees’ and employers’ organisations,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 28 November 2016 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period ending on 30 November 2019. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 28 November 2016 (2), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period ending on 30 November 2019.

2

| (2) | The employees’ organisation ETUC has submitted one nomination for a post to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The employees’ organisation ETUC has submitted one nomination for a post to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following person is hereby appointed as alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for France:

I.   REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES’ ORGANISATIONS

| Country | Member | Alternate member |
| --- | --- | --- |
| France | | Mr Romain LASSERRE |

Country

Member

Alternate member

France

Mr Romain LASSERRE

Article 2

The Council shall appoint members and alternate members who have not yet been nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 9 October 2017.

For the Council

The President

S. KIISLER

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 30.5.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Decision of 28 November 2016 appointing the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (OJ C 447, 1.12.2016, p. 2).

2

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Keith Tyrone HEYWARD.

No. 470P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Keith Tyrone Heyward, Pro Se.

*498Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 23rd day of August 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

I, Robert C. Cantwell, certify that:

1.     I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of B&G Foods, Inc.;

2.     Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)    designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)   evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)    disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)    allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)   any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: July 27, 2005              |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| /s/ ROBERT C. CANTWELL |   |
| Robert C. Cantwell                    |   |
| *Chief Financial Officer*             |   |
|                                       |        |  |

 

----
Kirkland v. Kirkland.

No. S06A0497.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

March 27, 2006.

Judgments Affirmed Without Opinion.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called the optional “peg” rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This rate will be 2.75 percent for the July-September quarter of FY 2022.

Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for any third party lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New York Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given State.

John Wade,

Chief, Secondary Market Division.

[FR Doc. 2022-14314 Filed 7-5-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Lisa Bermudez, Respondent, v City of New York, Defendant, and Acme-Skillman Concrete Co., Inc., Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 497]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered February 14, 2005, which denied the motion of defendant-appellant Acme-Skillman Concrete Co. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed as against defendant-appellant. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Contrary to the motion court’s finding, the street opening permit for catch basin installation work at the intersection where plaintiff stepped into a pothole and broke her ankle, and the City’s contract with Acme for such work, are insufficient to raise a question of fact as to whether such work was actually performed. The undisputed testimony of Acme’s project and of*259fice managers that, although it had obtained the permit, the City had cancelled the contract and, as a result, Acme performed no work at the site, together with the undisputed record of Acme’s job site locations listing the areas where it actually worked pursuant to the contract, which did not include the site of plaintiffs accident, warrants granting summary judgment in Acme’s favor. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Marlow and Sullivan, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5264 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5264

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
   To extend the Andean Trade Preference Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Andean Trade Preference Extension 
Act of 2008''.
SEC. 2. ANDEAN TRADE PREFERENCE ACT.
    (a) Extension.--Section 208 of the Andean Trade Preference Act (19 
U.S.C. 3206) is amended by striking ``February 29, 2008'' and inserting 
``December 31, 2008''.
    (b) Treatment of Certain Apparel Articles.--Section 204(b)(3) of 
the Andean Trade Preference Act (19 U.S.C. 3203(b)(3)(B)) is amended--
        (1) in subparagraph (B)--
            (A) in clause (iii)--
                (i) in subclause (II), by striking ``5 succeeding 1-
            year periods'' and inserting ``6 succeeding 1-year 
            periods''; and
                (ii) in subclause (III)(bb), by inserting ``and for the 
            succeeding 1-year period,'' after ``for the 1-year period 
            beginning October 1, 2007,''; and
            (B) in clause (v)(II), by striking ``4 succeeding 1-year 
        periods'' and inserting ``5 succeeding 1-year periods''; and
        (2) in subparagraph (E)(ii)(II), by striking ``December 31, 
    2006'' and inserting ``December 31, 2008''.
SEC. 3. CUSTOMS USER FEES.
    Section 13031(j)(3) of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget 
Reconciliation Act of 1985 (19 U.S.C. 58c(j)(3)) is amended--
        (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``December 13, 2014'' and 
    inserting ``December 27, 2014''; and
        (2) in subparagraph (B)(i), by striking ``December 13, 2014'' 
    and inserting ``December 27, 2014''.
SEC. 4. TIME FOR PAYMENT OF CORPORATE ESTIMATED TAXES.
    The percentage under subparagraph (C) of section 401(1) of the Tax 
Increase Prevention and Reconciliation Act of 2005 in effect on the 
date of the enactment of this Act is increased by 0.25 percentage 
points.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
SWINEY v. ARVIN MERITOR, INC.

No. COA05-913.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed March 7, 2006.

Certification Date March 27, 2006.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission(I.C. #189631)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our reports dated February 6, 2004, accompanying the consolidated
financial statement and schedule in the Annual Report of I-Sector Corporation
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of
I-Sector Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-41001, effective November 25,
1997 and File No. 333-60320, effective May 7, 2001).



/s/Grant Thornton LLP
Houston, Texas
March 11, 2004
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 546 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 546

                   For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2007

  Mr. Upton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Ibrahim Parlak.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR IBRAHIM PARLAK.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Ibrahim 
Parlak shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for 
adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Ibrahim Parlak enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Ibrahim 
Parlak shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Ibrahim Parlak, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Ibrahim Parlak under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 
Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)) or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of birth of 
Ibrahim Parlak under section 202(e) of that Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Ibrahim 
Parlak shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

TELANETIX, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telanetix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas A. Szabo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|                   |  |                        
|Date: May 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Thomas A. Szabo    
|                   |  | Thomas A. Szabo        
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer
Order filed February 4, 2020

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 19

- 00985

- CV

____________ ELIGWE, LLC, ET AL , Appellant

V.
LARRY PAUL MANLEY JUNIOR, Appellee

On Appeal from the 127th District Court

Harris County, Texas Tria l Court Cause No. 2018

- 53467



### O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed December 11 , 2018

. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from pa ying costs has be en filed.
See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the

c lerk of this court on or before February 14, 2020

. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. Ifap pellant fails to timely pay the fi ling fee in accordance with this order, the appeal

will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Christopher and Bourliot.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v. M.M. FOWLER, INC.

No. 305PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

W. Richard Moore, E. Burke Haywood, Special Deputy Attorney General, Richard A. Graham, Assistant Attorney General, for Department of Transportation.

James H. Hughes, for M.M. Fowler, Inc.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of June 2005 by the Department of Transportation in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).