Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2022 / Notices 41715 

TABLE 1—PROPOSED INTERIM DECISIONS

Registration review case name and No. Docket ID No. Chemical review manager and contact information 

2-methyl-1-butanol, Case Number 6308 .......................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0303 Jennifer Odom, odom.jennifer@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1536. 

Calcium Acetate, Case Number 6341 ............................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0304 Jennifer Odom, odom.jennifer@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1536. 

Candida oleophila, Case Number 6019 ........................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0445 Hannah Dean, dean.hannah@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1531. 

Cedarwood Oil, Case Number 3150 ................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0108 Jennifer Odom, odom.jennifer@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1536. 

Chlorflurenol Methyl Ester (CME), Case Number 2095 .. EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0037 Quinn Gavin, gavin.quinn@epa.gov, (202) 566–2284. 

Citral, Case Number 6314 ............................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0301 Susanne Cerrelli, cerrelli.susanne@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1516. 

Heptyl butyrate, Case Number 6305 ............................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0402 Hannah Dean, dean.hannah@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1531. 

L-Carvone, Case Number 6306 ....................................... EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0392 Susanne Cerrelli, cerrelli.susanne@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

1516. 

Sedaxane, Case Number 7065 ........................................ EPA–HQ–OPP–2022–0448 Christian Bongard, bongard.christian@epa.gov, (202) 

566–2248. 

Tebuconazole, Case Number 7004 ................................. EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0378 Tiffany Green, green.tiffany@epa.gov, (202) 566–2224. 

Triadimefon and Triadimenol, Case Numbers 2700 and 

7008.

EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0114 Matthew B. Khan, khan.matthew@epa.gov, (202) 566– 

2212. 

The registration review docket for a 

pesticide includes earlier documents 

related to the registration review case. 

For example, the review opened with a 

Preliminary Work Plan, for public 

comment. A Final Work Plan was 

placed in the docket following public 

comment on the Preliminary Work Plan. 

The documents in the dockets 

describe EPA’s rationales for conducting 

additional risk assessments for the 

registration review of the pesticides 

included in Table 1 in Unit IV., as well 

as the Agency’s subsequent risk findings 

and consideration of possible risk 

mitigation measures. These proposed 

interim registration review decisions are 

supported by the rationales included in 

those documents. Following public 

comment, the Agency will issue interim 

or final registration review decisions for 

the pesticides listed in Table 1 in Unit 

IV. 

The registration review final rule at 40 

CFR 155.58(a) provides for a minimum 

60-day public comment period on all 

proposed interim registration review 

decisions. This comment period is 

intended to provide an opportunity for 

public input and a mechanism for 

initiating any necessary amendments to 

the proposed interim decision. All 

comments should be submitted using 

the methods in ADDRESSES and must be 

received by EPA on or before the closing 

date. These comments will become part 

of the docket for the pesticides included 

in the Tables in Unit IV. Comments 

received after the close of the comment 

period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not 

required to consider these late 

comments. 

The Agency will carefully consider all 

comments received by the closing date 

and may provide a ‘‘Response to 

Comments Memorandum’’ in the 

docket. The interim registration review 

decision will explain the effect that any 

comments had on the interim decision 

and provide the Agency’s response to 

significant comments. 

Background on the registration review 

program is provided at: https://

www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation. 

Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. 

Dated: July 6, 2022. 

Mary Reaves, 

Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, 

Office of Pesticide Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14871 Filed 7–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[Petition IV–2021–5; FRL–9978–01–R4] 

Clean Air Act Operating Permit 

Program; Petition for Objection to 

State Operating Permit for Alabama 

Power Company—Barry Generating 

Plant (Mobile County, Alabama) 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of final Order on petition 

to object to state operating permit. 

SUMMARY: The EPA Administrator 

signed an Order, dated June 14, 2022, 

granting in part and denying in part the 

petition submitted by Sierra Club and 

Greater-Birmingham Alliance to Stop 

Pollution (Petitioners) objecting to a 

proposed Clean Air Act (CAA) title V 

operating permit issued to Alabama 

Power Company for its Barry Generating 

Plant located in Mobile County, 

Alabama. The Order responds to a 

March 30, 2021, petition requesting that 

EPA object to the final operating permit 

number 503–1001. The title V operating 

permit was issued by the Alabama 

Department of Environmental 

Management (ADEM). The Order 

constitutes a final action on the petition 

addressed therein. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the Order, the 

petition, and all pertinent information 

relating thereto are on file at the 

following location: EPA Region 4; Air 

and Radiation Division; 61 Forsyth 

Street SW; Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

The Order and petition are also 

available electronically at the following 

addresses: https://www.epa.gov/system/ 

files/documents/2022-06/ 

APC%20Barry%20Order_6-14-22.pdf; 

https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operatingpermits/title-v-petition-database. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Art 

Hofmeister, Air Permits Section, EPA 

Region 4, at (404) 562–9115 or 

hofmeister.art@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA 

affords EPA a 45-day period to review 

and, as appropriate, the authority to 

object to operating permits proposed by 

state permitting authorities under title V 

of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7661–7661f. 

Section 505(b)(2) of the CAA and 40 

CFR 70.8(d) authorize any person to 

petition the EPA Administrator to object 

to a title V operating permit within 60 

days after the expiration of EPA’s 45- 

day review period if EPA has not 

objected on its own initiative. Petitions 

must be based only on objections to the 

permit that were raised with reasonable 

specificity during the public comment 

period provided by the state, unless the 

petitioner demonstrates that it was 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
41716 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 13, 2022 / Notices 

impracticable to raise these issues 

during the comment period or the 

grounds for the issues arose after this 

period. Pursuant to sections 307(b) and 

505(b)(2) of the CAA, a petition for 

judicial review of those parts of the 

Order that deny issues in the petition 

may be filed in the United States Court 

of Appeals for the appropriate circuit 

within 60 days from the date this notice 

is published in the Federal Register. 

Petitioners submitted a petition 

requesting that EPA object to proposed 

CAA title V operating permit number 

503–1001 issued by ADEM to the Barry 

Generating Plant for the following 

reasons: the permit contained limits 

with the potential to exceed the 

National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

for sulfur dioxide, including 

inappropriate averaging limits for SO2, 

in contravention of applicable state 

implementation plan (SIP) provisions; 

the permit failed to include applicable 

SIP requirements to control fugitive 

emissions from the coal handling 

system and to ensure compliance with 

SIP opacity limit, including associated 

monitoring, recordkeeping, and 

reporting; the permit failed to include 

emission controls and work practice 

standards for the coal handling 

operations and ADEM failed to require 

that Alabama Power Company disclose 

all fugitive emissions from the coal 

handling system; ADEM failed to 

determine compliance of the facility; 

ADEM failed to require complete and 

accurate compliance certifications from 

Alabama Power Company in accordance 

with part 70; Alabama Power Company 

failed to include all applicable 

requirements in the application for a 

title V permit; and ADEM failed to 

provide a basis for granting a permit 

shield to the entire facility. 

On June 14, 2022, the Administrator 

issued an Order granting in part and 

denying in part the petition. The Order 

explains EPA’s bases for granting in part 

and denying in part the petition. 

Dated: July 5, 2022. 

Daniel Blackman, 

Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14900 Filed 7–12–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[EPA–HQ–OW–2015–0613; FRL–9956–01– 

OW] 

Information Collection Request; 

Proposed Renewal; Comment 

Request; Implementation of Title I of 

the Marine Protection, Research, and 

Sanctuaries Act 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is planning to submit an 

information collection request (ICR) 

renewal, ‘‘Implementation of Title I of 

the Marine Protection, Research, and 

Sanctuaries Act,’’ (EPA ICR No. is 

0824.08, OMB Control No. 2040–0008) 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (PRA). Before doing so, 

EPA is soliciting public comments on 

specific aspects of the proposed 

information collection as described 

below. An Agency may not conduct or 

sponsor and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted on 

or before September 12, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OW–2015–0613 (our preferred method), 

by email to: OW-Docket@epa.gov or by 

mail to: EPA Docket Center, 

Environmental Protection Agency, Mail 

Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW, Washington, DC 20460. All 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

profanity, threats, information claimed 

to be Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chris Laabs, Oceans, Wetlands, and 

Communities Division, mail code 

4504T, Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and, 

Watersheds, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 

Washington, DC 20460; telephone 

number: 202–566–1223; fax number: 

202–566–1147; email address: 

Laabs.Chris@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Supporting documents which explain in 

detail the information that the EPA will 

be collecting are available in the public 

docket for this ICR. The docket can be 

viewed online at www.regulations.gov 

or in person at the EPA Docket Center, 

WJC West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. 

The telephone number for the Docket 

Center is 202–566–1744. For additional 

information about EPA’s public docket, 

visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of 

the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), EPA 

is soliciting comments and information 

to enable it to: (i) evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the Agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (ii) evaluate the 

accuracy of the Agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions used; 

(iii) enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (iv) minimize the burden 

of the collection of information on those 

who are to respond, including through 

the use of appropriate automated 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. EPA will consider the 

comments received and amend the ICR 

as appropriate. The final ICR package 

will then be submitted to OMB for 

review and approval. At that time, EPA 

will issue another Federal Register 

notice to announce the submission of 

the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to 

submit additional comments to OMB. If 

approved by OMB, renewals are 

typically granted a three-year extension. 

Abstract: With limited exceptions, 

ocean dumping—the transportation of 

any material for the purpose of dumping 

material in ocean waters—is prohibited 

except in compliance with a permit 

issued under the Marine Protection, 

Research, and Sanctuaries Act 

(MPRSA). EPA is responsible for issuing 

ocean dumping permits for all materials 

except dredged material. The U.S. Army 

Corps of Engineers (USACE) is 

responsible for issuing ocean dumping 

permits for dredged material using 

EPA’s environmental criteria, though for 

federal projects, the USACE may apply 

the environmental criteria directly in 

lieu of the permit process. All ocean 

dumping permits and federal projects 

involving ocean dumping of dredged 

material are subject to EPA review and 

concurrence. EPA is also responsible for 

designating and managing ocean sites 

for the disposal of materials and 

establishing Site Management and 

Monitoring Plans for ocean disposal 

sites. EPA collects or sponsors the 

collection of information for the 

purposes of permit issuance, reporting 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1