alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dex Media West LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: August 1, 2008
    By:
    /s/ David C. SwansonDavid C. SwansonChairman of the Board of Directors and

Chief Executive Officer 30
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                                  FORM 10-K/A-3
(Mark One)
         X  Annual Report under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange 
            Act of 1934

   For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997

           Transition report under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities 
           Exchange Act of 1934 (No fee required)

         For the transition period from __________ to __________

         Commission file number 0-22325

                          ALYDAAR SOFTWARE CORPORATION
                 (Name of Small Business Issuer in its Charter)

             North Carolina                                87-0399301
    (State of Other Jurisdiction of                     (I.R.S. Employer
     Incorporation or Organization)                     Identification No.)

  2101 W. Rexford Road, Charlotte, North Carolina            28211
   (Address of Principal Executive Offices)                (Zip Code)

                                 (704) 365-2324
                (Issuer's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

        Securities registered under Section 12 (g) of the Exchange Act:

                                  Common Stock
                                (Title of Class)

         Check whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the  Exchange  Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the  registrant was required to file such reports),  and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for past 90 days.
Yes    X      No_____

         Check if there is no  disclosure  of  delinquent  filers in response to
Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will
be contained,  to the best of  registrant's  knowledge,  in definitive  proxy or
information  statements  incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  X

         State  the  aggregate   market  value  of  the  voting  stock  held  by
non-affiliates  computed by  reference to the price at which the stock was sold,
or the average bid and asked prices of such stock, as of a specified date within
the past 60 days. $173,952,160 as of March 30, 1998.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:  See Footnotes to Exhibits


<PAGE>

                                    SIGNATURE

                  Pursuant  to the  requirements  of  Section  13 or 15(d),  the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  Amendment  to Form  10-K to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                  ALYDAAR SOFTWARE CORPORATION

                                  By: /s/ Robert F. Gruder
                                      Robert F. Gruder, Chief Executive Officer,
                                         President and Chairman

Dated:  May 5, 1999



<PAGE>


                                INDEX TO EXHIBITS


   
10.8   Subcontractor Agreement between Alydaar and Compuware Corporation
       (previously filed with deletions as an exhibit to 10-K/A-2)*
    

------------------
         * Filed herewith
July 15, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

EDUARDO ENCARNACION ASCENCIO, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00266-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5477 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2008 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 120 South Del Mar Avenue in San Gabriel, 

California, as the ‘‘Chi Mui Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

HR 5477 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. CHI MUI POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 120 South Del Mar Avenue in 

4 San Gabriel, California, shall be known and designated as 

5 the ‘‘Chi Mui Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chi Mui Post Office 

10 Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 3, 2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Lamont HILL.

No. 505P00-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Timothy Lamont Hill, Pro Se.

William N. Farrell, Jr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State,

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 17th day of May 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Rutherford County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5391 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5391

        To suspend temporarily the duty on sodium hypophosphite.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To suspend temporarily the duty on sodium hypophosphite.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SODIUM HYPOPHOSPHITE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Sodium              Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          hypophosphite                                                      31/2011.......
                          (CAS No. 10039-56-
                          2) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2835.10.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SCOTT J. BIZZELL, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-886

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed September 12, 2018.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, 

Judge.

Scott J. Bizzell, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Galindez v. State, 955 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 2007); Tucker v. 

State, 726 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 1999); Knight v. State, 6 So. 3d 733 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009).

CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2





The following certification is provided by the undersigned Senior Executive Vice President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Centrue Financial Corporation on the basis of such officer’s knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





CERTIFICATION





In connection with the Annual Report of Centrue Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Kurt R. Stevenson, Senior Executive Vice President and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Kurt R. StevensonName: Kurt R. StevensonTitle: Senior Executive Vice President andPrincipal Financial and Accounting OfficerDate: March 25, 2011
----

----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                    Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                    and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrants. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |   |   |   |                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                August 14, 2007 |   | BY:    |   | /s/                William S. Morris IV                                       |
|                                 |   |   |   | **William                S. Morris IV**Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                 |   |   |
|                                 |   |   |   |                                                                          |
|                                 |   |   |   |                                                                          |
| Date:                August 14, 2007 |   | BY:    |   | /s/                Steve K. Stone                                             |
|                                 |   |   |   | **Steve                K. Stone**Chief                Financial Officer       |

----

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5428 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5428

   To direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to issue regulations 
  requiring pilots of certain vessels to carry and utilize a portable 
  electronic device equipped for navigational purposes, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2008

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Commandant of the Coast Guard to issue regulations 
  requiring pilots of certain vessels to carry and utilize a portable 
  electronic device equipped for navigational purposes, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vessel Navigation and Safety 
Improvement Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR PILOTS TO CARRY AND UTILIZE PORTABLE ELECTRONIC 
              NAVIGATIONAL DEVICE.

    (a) In General.--The Commandant of the Coast Guard shall issue 
regulations that--
            (1) require that any pilot licensed under subtitle II of 
        title 46, United States Code, while serving under the authority 
        of that license as a pilot on a covered vessel, shall carry and 
        utilize a portable electronic device that is--
                    (A) equipped for navigational purposes; and
                    (B) capable of being connected to an Automatic 
                Identification System, in accordance with the 
                International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 
                Chapter V, Regulation 19.2; and
            (2) require such pilots to obtain training in the use of 
        such electronic devices, and prescribe requirements for such 
        training.
    (b) Deadlines for Compliance.--The regulations shall require such 
pilots to--
            (1) carry and utilize electronic devices pursuant to 
        subsection (a)(1) by no later than 18 months after the date of 
        enactment of this Act; and
            (2) begin training pursuant to subsection (a)(2) by no 
        later than 12 months after the date of the enactment of this 
        Act.
    (c) Exemptions.--The Commandant may exempt a pilot from the 
requirement under subsection (a)(1) if the Commandant certifies that a 
portable electronic device is not necessary for the safe navigation of 
a covered vessel on the waters where the pilot operates.
    (d) Covered Vessel Defined.--In this section the term ``covered 
vessel'' means a self-propelled, commercial vessel of 300 gross tons or 
more.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2016217EN.01007101.xml

| 12.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 217/71 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 217/71

---

AMENDMENT TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE GENERAL COURT

THE GENERAL COURT,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the fifth paragraph of Article 254 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Having regard to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union, and in particular Article 63 thereof,

Whereas Regulation (EU) 2015/2424 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the Community trade mark and Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (1) changes the name of the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and it is appropriate in consequence to amend the Rules of Procedure to include in them a reference to the European Union Intellectual Property Office,

With the agreement of the Court of Justice,

With the approval of the Council given on 6 July 2016,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:

Article 1

In Article 1(2)(g) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court (2), the reference to ‘the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)’ is replaced by a reference to ‘the European Union Intellectual Property Office’.

Article 2

This amendment to the Rules of Procedure, authentic in the languages referred to in Article 44 of those Rules, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the day of its publication.

Done at Luxembourg, 13 July 2016.

Registrar

E. COULON

President

M. JAEGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 341, 24.12.2015, p. 21.

1

(2)  Rules of Procedure of the General Court (OJ L 105, 23.4.2015, p. 1).

2

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of B&GFoods, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 1, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, David L. Wenner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ David L. Wenner     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David L. Wenner         |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| April  27, 2006         |

 

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed April 

23, 2024.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00977-CV

IN RE STEIG ERICKSON, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

312th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2023-47632

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 29, 2023, relator Steig Erickson filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(c)(2); see also Tex. 

R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable 
2

Treasea Treviño, associate judge of the 312th District Court of Harris County, to

vacate the trial court’s December 21, 2023 temporary orders.

1

Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Zimmerer, and Spain. 

1 The Honorable Treasea Treviño is an associate judge of the 312th Family District Court of 

Harris County. The Honorable Teresa J. Waldrop is the presiding judge. Judge Treviño signed the 

complained-of temporary orders. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(c)(2) (writ power over “an 

associate judge of a district or county court appointed by a judge under Chapter 201, Family Code, in the 

court of appeals district for the judge who appointed the associate judge”).
Chester M. BOZETARNIK v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 69P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Chester M. Bozetarnik, Pro Se.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 26th day of January 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
Exhibit 10(k)

June 21, 2004

Earl Hoffman
Advanced Extraction Technologies, Inc.
2 Northpoint Drive, Suite 820
Houston, TX  77060
RE:  Small NRU - Gross Margin/Process Royalty

Dear Earl:

     Pending a formal amendment to the First Amended and Restated Agreement to
Develop Natural Gas Treatment Projects using the Mehra Gas Treating Units dated
January 1, 2004, this will confirm the following agreement regarding Mehra
Process nitrogen rejection units (NRU) with an inlet capacity of 2,500 Mcf per
day or less.

     Gateway will have the NRU fabricated by Process Recovery Systems (John
Tyson) based on a Process Design Basis Package prepared by AET at no cost to
Gateway or PRS. PRS will also ship to and install the NRU at the producer's
site. Gateway will quote the producer a turnkey price for the installed and
operational NRU to include the NRU, freight costs, installation charges and
technical support from AET through start-up and achievement of the performance
guarantees for the NRU. Gateway and AET will share equally the gross margin
realized on the installed NRU; provided, however, that AET will receive at least
$75,000 of the gross margin. The gross margin on the installed NRU is equal to
the turnkey price paid by the producer less the dollar amount invoice to Gateway
by Process Recovery Systems to design, purchase equipment components, fabricate,
ship, and install the NRU.

     In addition, we expect to obligate the producer to pay a Project Fee, which
consists of a development fee payable to Gateway and a process royalty payable
to AET, of at least $0.05 per inlet Mcf starting no earlier than the beginning
of the fifth year of operation. This Project Fee, if any, will be shared equally
between Gateway and AET.

     This letter agreement may be terminated by either party on thirty days
prior written notice to the other party; provided, however, that it shall remain
in effect with regard to each NRU with a capacity of 2,500 Mcf per day or less
for which a definitive agreement has been executed prior to the termination date
of this letter agreement by Gateway and a third party for the fabrication and
installation of the NRU.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Michael Fadden
------------------
Michael Fadden
President

Accepted and agreed to this 21st day of June 2004.

By:  /s/  Earl P. Hoffman
     --------------------
          Earl P. Hoffman
STATE v. PRUETT.

No. COA05-1077.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Cabarrus, (03CRS6469).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.