alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Infectious Diseases Research.                    

*Date:*                         August 3, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         2:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Shiv A Prasad, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5220, MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-443-5779,                         *prasads@csr.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: July 6, 2022.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-14685 Filed 7-8-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# L_2017131EN.01002201.xml

| 20.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 131/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 131/22

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2017/869

of 16 May 2017

appointing a member of the Court of Auditors

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal by Hungary,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of Mr Szabolcs FAZAKAS expired on 6 May 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of Mr Szabolcs FAZAKAS expired on 6 May 2016.

| (2) | A new appointment should therefore be made, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A new appointment should therefore be made,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Ildikó GÁLL-PELCZ is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 September 2017 to 31 August 2023.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 16 May 2017.

For the Council

The President

L. GRECH

---

(1)  Opinion of 27 April 2017 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50815 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SERGIO ESPINOSA-NAVEJAR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-03-CR-71-1

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sergio Espinosa-Navejar appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Espinosa-Navejar contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Espinosa-Navejar maintains thatNo. 03-50815 -2- he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Espinosa-Navejar acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.No. 03-50815 -3-
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brian F. Lavin, President and Chief Executive Officer of NTS RealtyCapital, Inc., Managing Partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership (the“Partnership”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.                                       The quarterly report on Form10-Q of the Partnership for the period ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

 
| Dated:  December 20, 2004          |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                    |
| /s/  Brian F. Lavin                     |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer, |
| NTS  Realty Capital, Inc.,              |
| Managing  Partner                       |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnershipand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John Salamon, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Salamon Group, Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.      The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness
of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented
in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any
change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small
business issuers internal control over financial reporting.

5.      I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business
issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting.

|Date: May 19, 2009 |        | /s/ John Salamon                   
|------------------ | ------ | -----------------------------------
|                   | Name:  | John Salamon                       
|                   | Title: | President, Chief Executive Officer,
|                   |        | Chief Financial Officer            

---
SCPW-13-0000050
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

RICHARD RUH, Petitioner,

vs. INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CAAP-12-0001021; S.P.P. NO. 12-1-0003(2))
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , A c o b a , M c K e n n a , a n d P o l l a c k , J J . )

Upon consideration of petitioner Richard Ruh’s petition for a writ of mandamus, which was filed on January 28, 2013, the documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and the record, it appears that petitioner does not have a clear and indisputable right to the appointment of counsel for an appeal in a post-conviction proceeding. Moreover, petitioner fails to demonstrate that the ICA exceeded its jurisdiction in denying his request for the appointment of counsel, committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion in doing so, or has refused to act on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in which the court has a legal duty to act. Petitioner, therefore, Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-13-0000050 14-FEB-2013 08:42 AMis not entitled to a writ of mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91

Hawai # i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action; where a court has discretion to act, mandamus will not lie to interfere with or control the exercise of that discretion, even when the court has acted erroneously, unless the court has exceeded its jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before the court under circumstances in which it has a legal duty to act). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 14, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack

2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0702 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOHN DANIEL FAILS JR,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 17 , 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 12 2023

10/12/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0702
HomeNewsCaribbean Mapping Expedition

# #ScienceAtSea

# Ocean Gliders

An ocean glider is an autonomous underwater vehicle used to collect ocean data. Scientists are now experimenting with using  gliders to locate populations of spawning fish. The glider shown in this video is outfitted with an acoustic receiver to “listen” for vocalizations—grunting sounds—made by some fish as they mass together to spawn in the U.S. Caribbean.  Learn more.

### Transcript:

 While we may know quite a bit about our coastal ocean,  there  is so much we don’t know about  what lies beneath the waves beyond our shores.

Because our ocean is so big, we need all the help we can  get. That’s why ocean gliders are such an exciting 21st century invention. 

Gliders are self-propelled robots that travel through the  ocean without help from humans.  All  humans have to do is program them with directions about where to go and what to  do ... and then set them free.

A glider may be equipped with many different sensors. It can  be outfitted to  monitor temperature,  salinity, currents, and other ocean conditions. Or, in the case of the little  glider here, it can seek out groups of fish by listening for sounds they make  when spawning. 

The glider records what its sensors detect to a memory  card.  When the mission is complete, it  surfaces and relays its position to a satellite. It then waits to be picked up.  Mission complete.

With ocean gliders, scientists are seeing the ocean as never  before. Who knows what these underwater robots will discover next?

###### **Search**

###### More **Information**

          - ROV or AUV...what's the difference?
          - What is an ocean glider?
          - National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
          - Coral Reef Conservation Program 
          - NOAA National Geophysical Data Center's Online Water Column Sonar Data viewer 

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Office of Personnel Management 5 CFR Ch. I
 AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.
 ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.
 SUMMARY: The following Office of Personnel Management (OPM) regulations are scheduled for development or review during the 6-month period following publication. This agenda carries out OPM's responsibilities to publish a semiannual agenda under Executive Order 12866, “Regulatory Planning and Review,” and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6). This publication does not impose a binding obligation on OPM with regard to any specific item on the agenda. Regulatory action in addition to the items listed is not precluded.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Hickman, (202) 606-1000. Stephen Hickman, Federal Register Liaison.
 Office of Personnel Management—Final Rule Stage
Sequence No.
Title
Regulation
                                     Identifier No.219
Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part II
3206-AO29
 OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT (OPM) Final Rule Stage 219. Requirements Related to Surprise Billing; Part II [3206-AO29] *Legal Authority:*Pub. L. 116-260, Division BB, title I and title II *Abstract:*
                             This final rule implements provisions related to the independent dispute resolution processes included in the Public Health Service Act sections 2799A-1(c) and 2799A-2(b), as added by sections 102(d), 103 and 105 of the No Surprises Act. *Timetable:* Action
Date
FR CiteInterim Final Rule
10/07/21
86 FR 55980Interim Final Rule Effective
10/07/21Interim Final Rule Comment Period End
12/06/21Final Action
06/00/22
 *Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required:*
                             Yes. *Agency Contact:*
                             Padma Babubhai Shah, Senior Policy Analyst, Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street NW, Washington, DC 20415, 
                            *Phone:*
                             202 606-4056, 
                            *Email: padma.shah@opm.gov.* *RIN:*
                             3206-AO29


[FR Doc. 2022-14614 Filed 8-5-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3280-F5-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5371 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5371

         To suspend the duty on Aluminum (0.008" and thinner).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

Mr. Barrett of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend the duty on Aluminum (0.008" and thinner).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALUMINUM (0.008" AND THINNER).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Aluminum, foil, w/  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          thickness over                                                     31/2011.......
                          0.01 mm but n/o
                          0.15 mm, rolled
                          but not further
                          worked, not
                          backed (provided
                          for in subheading
                          7607.11.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Spirit Finance Corporation (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Catherine Long, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

1.             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: November 14, 2005
|   | /s/  Catherine Long      |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Catherine  Long          |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 10.1


    
      

    

    EXHIBIT
      10.1

    


    Narrative
      Summary of Board Action Establishing 

    Base
      Salaires for Fiscal 2006

    


    On
      July
      21, 2005, the Board of Directors of American Consumers, Inc. (the "Company"),
      acting upon the recommendation of the Board's Compensation Committee, set the
      base salaries for the Company's executive officers for the fiscal year ending
      in
      May 2006. Such action included establishment of the following base salaries
      for
      those executive officers who serve as directors of the Company (Mr. Richardson
      also qualifies as a "named executive officer" pursuant to Item 402(a)(3) of
      Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K):

    


    
      	
              Name:

            	
              Title:

            	
              Annual
                Base Salary:

            
	 	 	 
	
              Michael
                A. Richardson

            	
              Chairman
                of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

            	
              $88,400

            
	 	 	 
	
              Paul
                R. Cook

            	
              Executive
                Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer 

            	
              66,976

            
	 	 	 
	
              Virgil
                E. Bishop

            	
              Vice
                President

            	
              66,976

            


    

    


    These
      base salaries remained unchanged from fiscal year 2005 levels.