alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SEC.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CUNO, Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark G. Kachur,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ MARK G. KACHUR
---------------------------------
Mark G. Kachur
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: December 18, 2003
#### Town of Brookhaven, Appellant, v Celia Durao, Also Known as Celia R. Durao, et al., Respondents.

[802 NYS2d 181]

*1084In an action, inter alia, to enforce certain building, zoning, and general ordinances of the Code of the Town of Brookhaven, the Town of Brookhaven appeals (1), as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Loughlin, J.), dated March 3, 2003, as granted the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and (2) from an order of the same court dated December 3, 2003, which amended the prior order.

Ordered that the order dated March 3, 2003, as amended December 3, 2003, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and the complaint is reinstated; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated December 3, 2003, is dismissed as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

This is an action, inter alia, to enforce certain building, zoning, and general ordinances of the Code of the Town of Brook-haven that regulate the use of land. The Supreme Court granted the defendants’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the general authority to commence actions on behalf of the Town, given to the Town Attorney by the Town Board’s resolution of January 4, 2001, was insufficient to satisfy the requirements of Town Law § 65, and that in the absence of specific authorization by the Town Board, the Town Attorney was without authority to commence this action. Town Law § 268 (2) provides, however, that “the proper local authorities of the town . . . may institute any appropriate action or proceedings to prevent” the use of land in violation of any local restriction. Here, the Town Board’s delegation to the Town Attorney of the authority to prosecute violations of the town’s local laws *(see*Brookhaven Town Code § 20-22 [C] [10]) was sufficient to designate the Town Attorney as the “proper local authority]” to commence civil actions to enjoin such violations under Town Law § 268 (2). Thus, without regard to Town Law § 65 or the January 4, 2001 resolution, the Town Attorney had the authority to commence this action on behalf of the Town, and the action, therefore, should not have been dismissed.

The parties’ remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
IN RE S.N.W.

No. COA05-335.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed December 20, 2005.

Certification Date January 9, 2006.

Appeal from Richmond (02J40)

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), the undersigned, Richard C. Ford, Chief Executive Officer of Puradyn
Filter Technologies, Incorporated ("the Company") has executed this
certification in connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report").

         The undersigned certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as
of the 31st day of March 2003.



                                                 /s/ Richard C. Ford
                                                 ------------------------
                                                 Name: Richard C. Ford
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonio
      F. Uccello, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: November
      21, 2005





/s/
      Antonio F. Uccello,
      III


Antonio
      F. Uccello, III


Chief
      Financial Officer
.

 

 



 



 

 

 



 



 

 

 



 



 

 

 



 

 



 

 



 

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
NEVADA 

#36 

$3.1 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#31 

1.5% OF STATE GDP 

0.5% 

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$974 

PER RESIDENT 

#35 

$1.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#32 

23,404 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#31 

$1.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 3%

Supplies and

Equipment: 21%

By Service 

Army

14%

Navy/Marines

16%

Air Force

Other Defense

8%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Service: 75%

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 15%

National 

Guard: 19%

Civilian: 13%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

24%

Navy/Marines

10%

Air Force

Other Defense

1%

Research and

Development: 2%

61%

Active Duty: 53%

65%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Sierra Nevada Corp. $396.8 M 

JT4 $321.6 M 

Huntington Ingalls $117.4 M 

M1 Support Services $91.9 M 

Amentum Services, Inc. $60.5 M 

Draken International, Inc. $48.3 M 

Day & Zimmermann Group $39.5 M 

Tactical Air Support, Inc. $27.5 M 

U.S. Ordnance $24.6 M 

Intelligent Waves $23.1 M 

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.8 $1.7 $1.7 $1.7 $1.5 $1.4 $1.3 $1.2

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$1.3 BILLION 23,404

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard 

Reserve Total 

Clark 11,035 2,037 2,030 2,936 18,038

Washoe 40 382 1,847 ND ND 

Churchill 1,177 309 120 589 2,195

Carson City ND 194 525 ND ND 

Mineral 0 49 0 0 49 

Humboldt 44 0 0 0 44 

Elko 0 ND 29 0 ND 

Pershing ND 0 0 0 ND 

Storey ND 0 0 0 ND 

Douglas 0 ND 0 0 ND 

74 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEVADA

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Humboldt

Pershing

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Clark

Washoe

Churchill

Mineral

Lyon

Carson City

Douglas

Storey

Elko

Nye

(K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

$937.0 M 

$491.4 M

$213.5 M

$62.0 M

$15.2 M

$10.1 M

$6.1 M

$1.1 M

$492.7 K

$170.3 K

Clark

Churchill

Washoe

Carson City

Mineral

Humboldt

Storey

Elko

Douglas

Pershing

$1.1 B

$123.6 M

$81.9 M

$38.0 M 

$3.3 M 

$1.3 M

$992.5 K

$613.5 K

$316.5 K

$255.8 K

Washoe

Storey

Churchill

Carson City Lyon

Douglas

Mineral Nye

Clark

Elko

Clark

Washoe

Elko

Carson City

Douglas

Mineral

Churchill

Storey

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 7

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

5
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5475 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5475

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make a technical correction 
 to ensure sex offenders who travel between States, regardless of when 
     they traveled, must register with appropriate state and local 
                              authorities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 19, 2008

 Mr. Moore of Kansas (for himself, Mrs. Biggert, Mrs. Boyda of Kansas, 
Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida, Mr. Castle, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Chandler, 
Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Davis of Alabama, Mr. Lincoln 
Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Edwards, 
 Mr. Gordon of Tennessee, Ms. Granger, Ms. Herseth Sandlin, Mr. Hill, 
   Mr. Israel, Mr. Jones of North Carolina, Mr. Kind, Mr. Kirk, Mr. 
   LaHood, Mr. Lampson, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Matheson, Mr. Peterson of 
 Minnesota, Mr. Poe, Ms. Pryce of Ohio, Mr. Ramstad, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, 
Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Van Hollen, and Mrs. 
Wilson of New Mexico) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to make a technical correction 
 to ensure sex offenders who travel between States, regardless of when 
     they traveled, must register with appropriate state and local 
                              authorities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sex Offender Mandatory Registration 
Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. SEX OFFENDER REGISTRATION.

    (a) Timing of Travel and Related Elements.--Section 2250(a)(2)(B) 
of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``or has traveled'' after ``travels'';
            (2) by inserting ``or has entered or left, or resided in,'' 
        before ``Indian country''; and
            (3) by inserting ``, after conviction of the offense by 
        reason of which the person is a sex offender as defined for the 
        purposes of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification 
        Act'' after ``Indian country''.
    (b) Continuing Nature of Offense.--Section 2250 of title 18, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Continuing Offense.--An offense under subsection (a) is a 
continuing offense so long as the failure described in subsection 
(a)(3) continues.''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. CELAYA

No. COA05-95.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed November 15, 2005.

Certification Date December 5, 2005

Appeal from the Forsyth (02CRS63584, 02CRS63585, 03CRS6168).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT (10)(20) Extension of Employment Agreement with Michael Winzkowski dated
October 15, 2006

[Marketing Worldwide, LLC Letterhead]

October 15, 2006

This letter is to confirm the agreement to extend the Employment Agreement dated
March 23, 2003 for two more years with your salary at $120,000 per year.

Further, this letter confirms in writing the understanding to reduce your salary
to $120,000 beginning in March 2005 and that no further amounts are due as
salary at September 30, 2006.

Sincerely,

MARKETING WORLDWIDE, LLC

                                              /s/ James Marvin, Manager

                                              Approved and Agreed

                                              /s/ Michael Winzkowski, Employee


                                       21
SLOOP v. TESFAZGHI

No. COA05-603

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Mecklenburg (01CVS12258).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
MOOLENAAR v. MOOLENAAR.

No. COA04-741.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Lincoln, (02CVD1082).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. DEAN.

No. COA05-469.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Guilford (02CRS101498, 02CRS101499).

Case without published opinion. No error.
102 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Bechtel Group $299.5 M

FedEx $228.7 M

BAE Systems $153.2 M

Jacobs $147.1 M

Delek US Holdings, Inc. $143.5 M

Chemring Group $69.4 M

Integration Innovation, Inc. $51.5 M

ECI Defense Group $28.2 M

L3Harris Technologies $26.8 M

NANA Regional Corp. $21.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

TENNESSEE

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.1 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

26,134

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Shelby 1,465 2,462 1,319 1,225 6,471

Davidson 315 1,090 2,359 1,319 5,083

Blount 21 115 1,621 ND ND

Rutherford 43 128 861 445 1,477

Montgomery 62 1,350 54 ND ND

Hamilton 31 103 421 825 1,380

Knox 65 351 179 715 1,310

Coffee 49 474 237 11 771

Gibson 0 33 347 0 380

Washington 19 31 68 261 379

Construction: 7% Research and 

Development: 3%

Service: 62%

Supplies and

Equipment: 28%

Active Duty: 9%

Civilian: 25%

National Guard: 47%

Reserve: 20%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

22%

13%

36%

28%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

59%

19%

18%

5%

$1.5 $1.7 $1.5

$2.0

$3.9

$2.1 $1.9 $1.8

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#35 #48 0.6% $437 #33 #24 #28 #33

$3.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.6% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$1.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

26,134 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$114.1 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 103

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Hickman

FISCAL YEAR 2018 TENNESSEE

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Coffee

Shelby

Sullivan

Williamson

Montgomery

Hardeman

Davidson

Knox

Anderson

Hickman

(M = millions)

$576.5 M

$435.6 M

$170.8 M

$151.4 M

$69.7 M

$69.4 M

$55.8 M

$55.5 M

$45.8 M

$44.2 M

Shelby

Davidson

Montgomery

Blount

Coffee

Knox

Rutherford

Hamilton

Madison

Washington

$419.7 M

$229.1 M

$94.7 M

$59.2 M

$54.1 M

$44.5 M

$43.5 M

$36.0 M

$11.7 M

$11.4 M

Montgomery

Shelby Hardeman

Sullivan

Davidson Anderson

Knox

Coffee

Coffee

Rutherford

Montgomery

Davidson

Williamson

Madison

Washington

Blount

Shelby Hamilton

Knox
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Southern
Investments UK plc Form 10-K for the twelve months ended March 31, 2000, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. Values are
in (pound) sterling.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> Pounds Sterling



<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.5922
<BOOK-VALUE>                                       PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                          1,250
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        15
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                             87
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                           0
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                     705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     2,057
<COMMON>                                           0
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                          902
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                               (123)
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                     779
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              50
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                               301
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 342
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                          0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                     0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                      0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                          0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                   0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                     585
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                      2,057
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                          275
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         143
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                         143
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                            132
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 209
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                               74
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                     267
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           56
<NET-INCOME>                                       211
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                      0
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                           188
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                          0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                             124
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 131 (Monday, July 11, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 41060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14683]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 270

[Release Nos. 34-95148A; IA-6056A; IC-34635A; File No. S7-15-21]
RIN 3235-AM97


Electronic Submission of Applications for Orders Under the 
Advisers Act and the Investment Company Act, Confidential Treatment 
Requests for Filings on Form 13F, and Form ADV-NR; Amendments to Form 
13F

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document makes a technical correction to an amendment 
concerning the electronic submission of applications for orders under 
the Investment Company Act, as adopted in Release No. 34-95148 (June 
23, 2022) (``Adopting Release''), which was published in the Federal 
Register on June 30, 2022.

DATES: Effective August 29, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zeena Abdul-Rahman, Branch Chief; Sara 
Cortes, Senior Special Counsel; or Brian McLaughlin Johnson, Assistant 
Director, at (202) 551-6792, Investment Company Regulation Office, 
Division of Investment Management; or Alexis Palascak, Senior Counsel 
at (202) 551-6787 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#175e5665627b72645764727439707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="276e6655524b42546754424409404851">[email protected]</span></a>, Investment Adviser Regulation 
Office, Division of Investment Management, Securities and Exchange 
Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-8549.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We are making a technical amendment to 
correct Sec.  270.0-2. Specifically, this document amends Instruction 
12.b. published in the Adopting Release to correct a sentence 
reference.
    In document FR doc. 2022-13936, which was published in the Federal 
Register on June 30, 2022, at 87 FR 38943, the following correction is 
made:


Sec.  270.0-2   [Corrected]

0
1. On page 38976, in the second column, Instruction 12.b. for Sec.  
270.0-2 is corrected to read as follows: ``Removing the sixth sentence 
in paragraph (b).''

    Dated: July 6, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-14683 Filed 7-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Marc L. Reisch                   
|                      |  | Marc L. Reisch                       
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | (principal executive officer)
In re PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY FAILURE. Sandra D. MELTON, and husband, Robert Morris Melton, Jr. and Robert Christopher Melton v. TINDALL CORPORATION, formerly, Tindall Concrete Products, Inc.

No. 596P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Mona Lisa Wallace, Salisbury, Cathy A. Williams, K. Edward Greene, Raleigh, for Robert C. Melton.

Robert J. King, III, Reid J. King, III, Reid L. Phillips, Greensboro, for Tindall Corporation.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of October 2005 by Plaintiff (Robert Christopher Melton) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*383"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."

Justice MARTIN recused.
WILLIAMS v. COLONY TIRE CORP.

No. COAO4-1614.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from NC Industgrial Commission (I.C. #041688).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.