alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2017108EN.01003501.xml

| 26.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 108/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 108/35

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2017/734

of 25 April 2017

amending Decision 2013/184/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 April 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/184/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 April 2013, the Council adopted Decision 2013/184/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma.

| (2) | On 21 April 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/627 (2) renewing the restrictive measures until 30 April 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 21 April 2016, the Council adopted Decision (CFSP) 2016/627 (2) renewing the restrictive measures until 30 April 2017.

| (3) | On the basis of a review of Decision 2013/184/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 30 April 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

On the basis of a review of Decision 2013/184/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 30 April 2018.

| (4) | Decision 2013/184/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2013/184/CFSP should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 3 of Decision 2013/184/CFSP is replaced by the following:

‘Article 3

This Decision shall apply until 30 April 2018. It shall be kept under constant review. It shall be renewed, or amended as appropriate, if the Council deems that its objectives have not been met.’

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 25 April 2017.

For the Council

The President

I. BORG

---

(1)  Council Decision 2013/184/CFSP of 22 April 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma and repealing Decision 2010/232/CFSP (OJ L 111, 23.4.2013, p. 75).

1

(2)  Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/627 of 21 April 2016 amending Decision 2013/184/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Myanmar/Burma (OJ L 106, 22.4.2016, p. 23).

2

---
# L_2016162EN.01000301.xml

| 21.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 162/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 162/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/984

of 7 June 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Krupnioki śląskie (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland's application to register the name ‘Krupnioki śląskie’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland's application to register the name ‘Krupnioki śląskie’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Krupnioki śląskie’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Krupnioki śląskie’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Krupnioki śląskie’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.) set out in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 June 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 67, 20.2.2016, p. 17.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5165 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5165

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-Anilino-3-nitro-N-
                       phenylbenzenesulphonamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

Mr. Brady of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-Anilino-3-nitro-N-
                       phenylbenzenesulphonamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-ANILINO-3-NITRO-N-PHENYLBENZENESULPHONAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.52 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4-Anilino-3-nitro-N-
phenylbenzenesulphonamide) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
28 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

COLORADO 

#15

$12.4 B SPENT IN 

#16

2.8% OF STATE GDP

2.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,138

PER RESIDENT 

#15

$8.4 B CONTRACT 

#11

64,103 NUMBER OF 

#10

$4.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 5% Research and Supplies and Development: 27% Equipment: 19%

Service: 48%

By Service 

Army

16%

Navy/Marines

12%

Air Force

57%

Other Defense

15%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 14%

National 

Guard: 9%

Civilian: 19%

Active Duty: 59%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

62%

Navy/Marines

4%

Air Force

32%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Lockheed Martin

United Launch Alliance

Sierra Nevada Corp.

Raytheon Technologies

L3Harris Technologies

Jacobs

Bechtel Group

Peraton Corp.

Ball Corp.

M.C. Dean, Inc.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.3 B

$632.9 M

$463.7 M

$389.0 M

$362.8 M

$280.2 M

$274.2 M

$190.3 M

$166.4 M

$159.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$8.4 $7.6 $6.7 $6.3 $5.8 $5.8

FY14

$5.1 $4.8

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$4.0 BILLION 64,103

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

El Paso 34,419 9,103 1,072

Arapahoe 2,561 1,459 2,470

Denver 382 287 457 

Adams ND 99 337 

Weld ND 102 633

Jefferson 58 231 0 

Pueblo 15 426 152 

Boulder 83 62 79 

Montrose 0 0 138 

Mesa 19 22 93 

Reserve Total

4,758 49,352

1,789 8,279

572 1,698

1,012 ND 

128 ND 

425 714 

0 593 

ND ND 

0 138 

0 134 
(M=millions)

COLORADO FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

El Paso

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

El Paso

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

El Paso

Douglas

Arapahoe

Boulder

Pueblo

Adams

Jefferson

Denver

Larimer

Broomfield

(M = millions, B = billions)

$3.1 B

$1.9 B

$1.7 B

$311.7 M

$308.5 M

$230.3 M

$209.5 M

$209.4 M

$197.0 M

$102.0 M

El Paso

Arapahoe

Denver

Adams

Jefferson

Pueblo

Weld

Boulder

Douglas

Larimer

$3.3 B 

$453.5 M

$86.5 M

$48.7 M

$39.3 M 

$35.9 M

$29.7 M

$13.2 M

$8.6 M

$6.0 M

Adams

Arapahoe

Larimer

Boulder 

Broomfield

Pueblo

Denver

Jefferson

Douglas

Weld

Adams

Arapahoe

Pueblo

Boulder

Douglas

Larimer

Denver

Jefferson

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 29

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
EXHIBIT 23.1


[LOGO] Webb & Company, P.A.
       -------------------------------------------------------------------------
       Certified Public Accountants



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-69340) pertaining to the 2000 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Plan and
Compensatory Plan with Oscar Otero of Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated
and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-47312) pertaining to the 1999
Stock Option Plan of Puradyn Filter Technologies Incorporated, as amended, of
our report dated March 23, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 of Puradyn Filter Technologies
Incorporated included in the Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended
December 31, 2006.




/s/ Webb & Company, P.A.

WEBB & COMPANY, P.A.
Certified Public Accountants

April 2, 2007
STATE v. HERNANDEZ-MADRID.

No. COA04-294.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part; Remanded for resentencing in part.
STATE v. Leroy McNELL.

No. 37A87-6.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 5, 2005.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Chapel Hill, Robert H. Hale, Jr., for McNeil.

C. Colon Willoughby, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of August 2005 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File State's Response to Petition for Writ of Certiorari on September 2, 2005:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of August 2005."
KASLER v. BRIDGES.

No. 520P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

David J. Adinolfi, II, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

William L. Hill, Greensboro, for Kevin Bridges, et al.

Terry M. Sholar, for City of Monroe.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of September 2005 by Plaintiff for "Petition to Certify the Cause for Discretionary Review":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of November 2005."
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

                Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

 

(1)          this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)          the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gander Mountain Company.

 

Dated:  June 8, 2006

 
|     |     |     |     |     |   | /s/ Mark R. Baker                       |
|----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|     |     |     |     |     |   | Mark R. Baker                           |
| * * | * * | * * | * * | * * |   | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|     |     |     |     |     |   |                                    |
|     |     |     |     |     |   |                                    |
|     |     |     |     |     |   | /s/ Dennis M. Lindahl                   |
|     |     |     |     |     |   | Dennis M. Lindahl                       |
| * * | * * | * * | * * | * * |   | *Executive Vice President,*             |
| * * | * * | * * | * * | * * |   | *Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer* |

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-51192 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus COBY TEE GUNDY, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-571-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Coby Tee Gundy raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter , 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000), which held that Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), did not render 21 U.S.C. § 841 unconstitutional on its face. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






Board of Directors
SE Financial Corp.

We have  reviewed the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet of SE Financial
Corp.  and  subsidiary  as of  July  31,  2005,  and  the  related  consolidated
statements of income for the three-month  and nine-month  periods ended July 31,
2005 and 2004, and the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity
for the nine-month period ended July 31, 2005, and the consolidated statement of
cash  flows for the  nine-month  periods  ended  July 31,  2005 and 2004.  These
consolidated  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of the  Company's
management.

We conducted  our review in  accordance  with  standards  of the Public  Company
Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States).  A review of  interim  financial
information consists principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with the  standards  of the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board,  the
objective  of which is the  expression  of an opinion  regarding  the  financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with U.S generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in  accordance  with the  standards of the Public
Company  Accounting  Oversight Board (United States),  the consolidated  balance
sheet as of October 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes  in  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented  herein);  and in our report  dated  December 3, 2004 we  expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



/s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
August 31, 2005
SUNBELT RENTALS, INC. v. HEAD & ENGQUIST EQUIPMENT, L.L.C., d/b/a H & E Hi-Lift, Robert Hepler, Douglas Kline, Michael Quinn, Gregg L. Christensen, Patrick C. Muldoon, Michele U. Dougherty, and Brian W. Pearsall.

No. 647P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Irving M. Brenner, Paul M. Navarro, Charlotte, for Head & Engquist Equipment, et al.

*290William L. Rikard, Jr., Charlotte, for Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of November 2005 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZHONGPIN INC. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Xianfu Zhu, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2007                           By: /s/ Xianfu Zhu
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Xianfu Zhu
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4849 

To prohibit discrimination in Federal assisted health care services and research programs on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, sexual 

orientation, or disability status. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Ms. RICHARDSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit discrimination in Federal assisted health care 

services and research programs on the basis of sex, race, 

color, national origin, sexual orientation, or disability 

status. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Rights for 

5 Health Care Act Title 42’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4849 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DISCRIMINATION IN FEDERAL AS2 SISTED HEALTH CARE SERVICES AND RE3 SEARCH PROGRAMS ON THE BASIS OF SEX, 

4 RACE, COLOR, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEXUAL 

5 ORIENTATION, OR DISABILITY STATUS. 

6 No person in the United States shall, on the basis 

7 of sex, race, color, national origin, sexual orientation, or 

8 disability status, be excluded from participation in, be de9 nied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination 

10 under any health care service or research program or ac11 tivity receiving Federal financial assistance. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5246 

To suspend temporarily the duty on acid black 132. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on acid black 132. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACID BLACK 132. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.59 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 acid black 132) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5329 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 ENTRIES OF TRUCK TIRES. 

5 (a) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION REQUIRED.— 

6 Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff Act 

7 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520), or any other provi8 sion of law, U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall, 

9 not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act— 

11 (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty each 

12 entry described in subsection (b) containing any 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5329 IH

1 merchandise which, at the time of original liquida2 tion, was merchandise eligible for duty-free treat3 ment under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

4 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.); and 

5 (2) refund any duties and interest paid on such 

6 entries. 

7 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

8 subsection (a) are the following: 

Port Code Entry Number Date of Entry 

1603 669–1390524–7 01/06/2005 

1603 669–1390685–6 01/13/2005 

1603 669–1390841–5 01/19/2005 

1603 669–1390922–3 01/26/2005 

1603 669–1390976–9 02/01/2005 

1603 669–1391122–9 02/08/2005 

1603 669–1391290–4 02/15/2005 

1603 669–1391445–4 02/23/2005 

1603 669–1391657–4 03/03/2005 

1603 669–1391878–6 03/03/2005 

1603 669–1391971–9 03/08/2005 

1603 669–1392154–1 03/15/2005 

1603 669–1392378–6 03/23/2005 

1603 669–1392556–7 03/30/2005 

1603 669–1392717–5 04/06/2005 

1603 669–1392941–1 04/13/2005 

1603 669–1393112–8 04/16/2005 

1603 699–1393352–0 04/27/2005 

1603 669–1393560–8 05/04/2005 

1603 669–1393729–9 05/11/2005 

1603 669–1393950–1 05/17/2005 

1603 669–1394191–1 05/24/2005 

1603 669–1394348–7 06/01/2005 

1603 669–1394549–0 06/07/2005 

1603 669–1394835–3 06/15/2005 

1603 669–1395050–8 06/21/2005 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS