alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 422/8 De

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 422 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 608 December 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 422

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 608 December 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 422/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2017/C 422/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 20 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 422/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2017/C 422/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

20

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 422/03 | State Aid SA.45359 (2016/N) — Slovakia — State Aid SA.45359 (2017/C) (ex 2016/N) — Aid for Jaguar Land Rover s.r.o. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  ) | 21 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2017/C 422/03

State Aid SA.45359 (2016/N) — Slovakia — State Aid SA.45359 (2017/C) (ex 2016/N) — Aid for Jaguar Land Rover s.r.o. — Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 108(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (
  1
  )

1

21

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Joseph STEPHENSON, Petitioner, v. CONNECTICUT

No. 19-5092

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Air Force

Army

Navy/Marines

Other Defense

1%

20%

5%

74%

$5.5 $5.3

$6.1

$5.2 $5.8 $5.9

$5.0 $5.4

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

95%

1%

3%

1%

Research and Construcon: 2%

 Development: 0%

Service: 83%

Supplies and

 Equipment: 15%

Acve Duty: 59%

Civilian: 18%

Naonal Guard/

Reserve: 23%

Humana

Lockheed Marn

Bechtel Parsons Blue Grass, JV

Raytheon

Boeing

BAE Systems

SourceAmerica

SAIC

PAE

Hewle‐Packard

$3.2 B

$527.8 M

$279.9 M

$249.6 M

$122.5 M

$69.1 M

$51.5 M

$40.5 M

$37.2 M

$26.8 M

Chrisan

Hardin

Jefferson

Madison

Franklin

Fayee

Boone

Campbell

Muhlenberg

McCracken

County

30,460

12,416

3,642

1,671

1,373

993

594

405

329

326

Total*

27,522

5,157

113

ND

26

57

ND

ND

ND

ND

Acve Duty

   Military

2,709

4,554

1,118

942

293

102

17

21

71

12

Civilian

 FISCAL YEAR 2017

KENTUCKY

   DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Con ense Con ense Contractors (M=millions B=billions)

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

   DEFENSE PERSONNEL

Allocaons, By Type

Allocaons, By Service

$2.8 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

$2.8 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

55,866

TOTAL PERSONNEL

55,866

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Loc sonnel Loc sonnel Locaons

*Total also includes unif al also includes uniformed Na ormed Naonal Guar onal Guard and R d and Reserve units. e units.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

50 Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017
AF Guard Army Actve Army Guard

KENTUCKYKENTUCKYKENTUCKY KENTUCKY

#17 #10 2.0% $1,845 #16 #17 #14

$8.2 B

SPENT IN STATE

4.0% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S.

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $5.4 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

55,866 NUMBER

OF PERSONNEL

$2.8 B PERSONNEL

SPENDING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions) B=billions)(M=millions

TENNESSEE

Jeferson County

$3.6 B

Fayete County

$669.8 M

Hardin County

$344.4 M

Madison County

$316.7 M

Christan County

$302.8 M

Boone County

$27.9 M

Wayne County

$20.8 M

Livingston County

$20.2 M

Laurel County

$15.8 M

Menifee County

$14.5 M

Jeferson

Fayete

Hardin

Madison

Christan

Boone

Wayne

Livingston

Laurel

Menifee

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions) B=billions)(M=millions

TENNESSEE

Christan County

$1.7 B

Hardin County

$711.5 M

Jeferson County

$141.7 M

Madison County

$73.1 M

Franklin County

$55.9 M

Fayete County

$24.5 M

Muhlenberg County

$7.7 M

Perry County

$7.3 M

Boone County

$7.3 M

Campbell County

$5.6 M

Christan

Hardin

Jeferson

Madison

Franklin Fayete

Muhlenberg

Perry

Boone Campbell

Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017 51
IN RE A.L.

No. COA04-1452.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Durham (03J264).

Case without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
STATE v. MOSELY.

No. COA05-1114.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed May 16, 2006.

Certification Date June 5, 2006.

Case without published opinion. No error.
The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 06, 2013

No. 04-12-00813-CR

Tracy Devon BROWN,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009CR5633

The Honorable Angus McGinty, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file the reply brief is GRANTED. Time

is extended to December 6, 2013.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of November, 2013.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Idaho General Mines, Inc., a Idaho Corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Idaho General Mines, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Idaho General Mines, Inc.

Date:  May 14, 2004

/s/ Robert L. Russell

________________________________

Robert L. Russell,

President and Chief Executive Officer









#
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of KPMG LLP**

 

The Board of Directors 

Navigant Consulting, Inc. 

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-53506, 333-81680, 333-30267 and 333-103405) on Form S-8 of NavigantConsulting, Inc. of our report dated February 7, 2003 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Navigant Consulting, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations,shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Navigant Consulting, Inc. 

 

Our report refers to a change in accounting for goodwill in the year endedDecember 31, 2002. 

 

/s/    KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois 

March 13, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5483 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5483

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, as the ``Private First 
           Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. PRIVATE FIRST CLASS DAVID H. SHARRETT II POST OFFICE 
BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Private First Class David H. Sharrett II 
Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Private 
First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7859

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JIMMY O’NEAL BROWN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, Chief District Judge. (CR-98-189; CA-01-410-5) Submitted: May 10, 2006 Decided: June 8, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy O’Neal Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jimmy O’Neal Brown seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brown has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (the"Company") for the quarterly period endedMarch 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the "Report"), Mark E.Chertok, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of hisknowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

Date: May 12,2005

|  | By: /s/ Mark E.Chertok                 |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | Name:Mark E. Chertok Title:    Chief Financial Officer |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to theextent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed bythe Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tradestar Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report'), I, Clarence Downs, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004, that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                         /s/ Clarence Downs
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Clarence Downs, Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  November 21, 2005
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 20, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

127834 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

MICHIGAN TOOLING ASSOCIATION Maura D. Corrigan 

WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND, as Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Subrogee of DISTEL TOOL & MACHINE Justices COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 127834 

 COA: 249013 

Oakland CC: 2001-030684-CK 

FARMINGTON INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC,

Defendant/Third-Party PlaintiffAppellant,

and 

MACHINERY MAINTENANCE SPECIALISTS, 

INC., 

Defendant,
 and 

EMPLOYERS INSURANCE OF WAUSAU and 

WAUSAU INSURANCE COMPANIES, 

Third-Party Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On January 12, 2006, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to 

appeal the December 7, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, 

the application is again considered. In lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the 

judgment of the Court of Appeals and REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court 

for entry of judgment in favor of Farmington Insurance Agency, LLC. MCR 

7.302(G)(1). Farmington Insurance Agency did not owe a duty to Distel Tool & Machine 

Company because it could not have reasonably foreseen that Distel would rely on a 

certificate of insurance that was issued to another company. In all other respects, the 

application is DENIED, because this disposition renders moot the remaining question 

presented. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal. 

p0117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 20, 2006 

Clerk
#### In the Matter of Lakeside Manor Home for Adults, Inc., Appellant, v Antonia C. Noveleo, et al., Respondents.

[799 NYS2d 583]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State of New York Department of Health dated November 4, 2003, denying the petitioner’s application for Quality Incentive Payment Program benefits for the 2002-2003 fiscal year, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Giacobbe, J.), dated May 21, 2004, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is reinstated, and the sixth affirmative defense is stricken.

. The instant proceeding challenges a determination denying the petitioner’s application for Quality Incentive Payment Program (hereinafter QUIP) benefits for the 2002-2003 fiscal year. The petitioner submitted its application for those benefits on or about May 14, 2003, and the petitioner was notified that the application was denied on November 4, 2003. The instant proceeding was commenced on or about December 11, 2003.

Prior proceedings between the petitioner and the respondents were commenced on or about November 25, 2002, April 22, 2003, and May 27, 2003, respectively. At the time the prior proceedings were commenced, the petitioner’s application for QUIP benefits for the 2002-2003 fiscal year had not been denied. If the petitioner had attempted to raise a claim for QUIP *417benefits for the 2002-2003 fiscal year in those proceedings, the claim would have been dismissed as premature *(see Matter of Capote v Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr.,*168 AD2d 238 [1990]).

In view of the foregoing, dismissal of the instant proceeding pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (4) was improper. Prudenti, P.J., Goldstein, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

              Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-89549) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Plan, the 1999 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan, the Mobility.Net Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan and
Options under Stock Option Agreements of our report dated January 24, 2000, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of Software.com, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 1999.




                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Woodland Hills, California
March 27, 2000
**EXHIBIT 10.1**

**SKYEPHARMA PLC AND SUBSIDIARIES**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**

We hereby consent to the incorporation  by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-10006) and Form  S-8 (No. 333-14232) of SkyePharma PLC of our report dated April 9, 2002 (except  for the information in Notes 29 for which the date is June 24, 2002), relating  to the financial statements of SkyePharma PLC, which appear in SkyePharma PLC’s  Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2001.

**PricewaterhouseCoopers**London, United Kingdom

June 24, 2002

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; Mental Health Services Member Conflict.                    

*Date:*                         July 25, 2022.                    

*Time:*                         4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Regina Dolan-Sewell, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive BLVD, Room 4154, MSC 9606, Bethesda, MD 20852,                         *regina.dolan-sewell@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: June 27, 2022.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-14002 Filed 6-29-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P