alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



I, Tom D. Benscoter, Chief Financial Officer of Prosoft Learning Corporation (the Company), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-KSB (the Report) for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2005, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission, do hereby certify that to my knowledge:



| | 3 | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 4 | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company in respect of those items
required to be described or presented in such Report under Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/    TOM D. BENSCOTER
|Tom D. Benscoter       
|Chief Financial Officer



Date: October 27, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BRANDYWINE VILLAGE ASSOCIATES, LP AND L&R PARTNERSHIP, LLC,

Petitioners

v.

EAST BRANDYWINE TOWNSHIP BOARD

OF SUPERVISORS AND CARLINO EAST
BRANDYWINE, L.P.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 553 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of March, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Brobson did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
STATE v. LAWS

No. COA05-754

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Caldwell (04CRS1190, 04CRS1191, 04CRS1192, 04CRS1193).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 15, 2021

No. 04-20-00609-CV

OPUS AE GROUP, L.L.C.,

Appellant

v.

AKF GROUP, LLC,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-10826

Honorable Aaron Haas, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The third agreed motion for an extension of time for appellant to file a response to our 

show cause order and a brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s response and brief are due on or before

June 23, 2021.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of June, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
1 COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF I. K. AND E. K., CHILDREN , Appellant

. **§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§**

**§** No. 08

- 22

- 00 055

- C V Appeal from the

383 rd D istrict Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 201 9 D CM778 3 )

O R D E R This matter is before the Court to determine whether to dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. We will ABATE this appeal for fifteen days and withhold dismissal pending further inquiry. The 383rd District Court signed a final judgment in this case dated February 1, 2022. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on April 1, 2022. Because the notice of appeal app eared to be untimely filed, we questioned our jurisdiction over this matter and directed Appellant to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. In his response to the Court, Appellant averred that he did not receive notice of the trial court's February 1 judgment until March 11, 2022. As such, under Tex.R.Civ.P. 306a(4), the April 1 notice of appeal was timely because it was filed within 30 days of the date Appellant received actual notice of the trial court’s judgment.2 In order to establish the date of actual notice of a judgment for purposes of the appellate timetables under Rule 306a(4), the party adversely affected is required to prove in the trial court , on sworn motion and notice, the date on which the party of his at torney either first received notice of the judgment or acquired actual knowledge of the signing. See Tex.R.Civ.P. 306a(5), Hanash v. Walter Antiques, Inc. , 551 S.W.3d 920, 924

- 25 (Tex.App.

-- El Paso 2018, pet. denied). At this time, we do not have proof suc h a motion has been filed in the trial court or that the trial court has otherwise established the late notice date this Court should use, as is required by Rule 306a(5). Therefore, we ORDER this appeal to be abated for FIFTEEN DAYS to provide Appellant wi th the opportunity to either (1) show proof that the trial court has issued a Rule 306a(5) order that designates the date of actual notice of judgment, or (2) file a proper Rule 306a(5) motion with the trial court and provide this Court with proof such mot ion has been filed. Failure to provide these items to this Court before the abatement period ends may result in dismissal of this action without further notice to the parties.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14 th day of April , 20 2 2

. PER CURIAM

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Palafox and Alley , JJ.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

$9,000.00 U.S. Currency, Appellant

No. 06-14-00041-CV v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

CV39845). Opinion delivered by Chief 

Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find error in the judgment of the court 

below. West was entitled to relief. We reverse the judgment of forfeiture and dismiss the action 

against West for lack of personal jurisdiction.

We further order that the appellee, The State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED OCTOBER 30, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antonio
F. Uccello, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 22, 2005

/s/ Antonio F. Uccello, III
Antonio F. Uccello, III
Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Antonio
F. Uccello, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 22, 2005

/s/ Antonio F. Uccello, III
Antonio F. Uccello, III
Chief Financial Officer
| ·   | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ G. Hunter Haas                                                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | G. Hunter Haas, IV                                                        |
|   | President, Chief Investment Officer,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|   |                                                                      |
|   | August 6, 2010                                                            |
# L_2017324EN.01006901.xml

| 8.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 324/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 324/69

---

Corrigendum to Council Decision (EU) 2017/971 of 8 June 2017 determining the planning and conduct arrangements for EU non-executive military CSDP missions and amending Decisions 2010/96/CFSP on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces, 2013/34/CFSP on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian armed forces (EUTM Mali) and (CFSP) 2016/610 on a European Union CSDP military training mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 146 of 9 June 2017
  )

The title on the Contents page and the title on page 133:

for:

‘Council Decision (EU) 2017/971 of 8 June 2017 determining ...’,

read:

‘Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/971 of 8 June 2017 determining ...’.

---
# L_2021048DE.01002401.xml

| 11.2.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 48/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 48/24

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung Nr. 965/2012 der Kommission vom 5. Oktober 2012 zur Festlegung technischer Vorschriften und von Verwaltungsverfahren in Bezug auf den Flugbetrieb gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 216/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 296 vom 25. Oktober 2012
  )

Seite 18, Anhang II Teil-ARO Teilabschnitt GEN Abschnitt III Punkt ARO.GEN.350 Buchstabe d Nummer 2 Ziffer i:

Anstatt:

| „i) | hat die zuständige Behörde der Organisation eine Frist für die Durchführung von Abhilfemaßnahmen einzuräumen, die der Art der Beanstandung angemessen ist, anfänglich jedoch nicht mehr als drei Monate beträgt. Am Ende dieser Frist und unter Berücksichtigung der Art der Beanstandung kann die zuständige Behörde die Frist von 3 Monaten verlängern, wenn ihr ein zufriedenstellender Abhilfeplan vorgelegt und dieser von ihr genehmigt wird, und“, |
| --- | --- |

„i)

hat die zuständige Behörde der Organisation eine Frist für die Durchführung von Abhilfemaßnahmen einzuräumen, die der Art der Beanstandung angemessen ist, anfänglich jedoch nicht mehr als drei Monate beträgt. Am Ende dieser Frist und unter Berücksichtigung der Art der Beanstandung kann die zuständige Behörde die Frist von 3 Monaten verlängern, wenn ihr ein zufriedenstellender Abhilfeplan vorgelegt und dieser von ihr genehmigt wird, und“,

muss es heißen:

| „i) | hat die zuständige Behörde der Organisation eine Frist für die Durchführung von Abhilfemaßnahmen einzuräumen, die der Art der Beanstandung angemessen ist, anfänglich jedoch nicht mehr als drei Monate beträgt. Am Ende dieser Frist und unter Berücksichtigung der Art der Beanstandung kann die zuständige Behörde die Frist von 3 Monaten verlängern, wenn ihr ein zufriedenstellender Abhilfeplan vorgelegt wird und sie diesem zustimmt, und“. |
| --- | --- |

„i)

hat die zuständige Behörde der Organisation eine Frist für die Durchführung von Abhilfemaßnahmen einzuräumen, die der Art der Beanstandung angemessen ist, anfänglich jedoch nicht mehr als drei Monate beträgt. Am Ende dieser Frist und unter Berücksichtigung der Art der Beanstandung kann die zuständige Behörde die Frist von 3 Monaten verlängern, wenn ihr ein zufriedenstellender Abhilfeplan vorgelegt wird und sie diesem zustimmt, und“.

---
Mark W. WARD v. WACHOVIA BANK, N.A.

No. 666P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 26, 2006.

Mark A. Ward, Pro Se.

Kevin G. Williams, Winston-Salem, Michael D. Phillips, for Wachovia Bank.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of December 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 26th day of January 2006."
Exhibit 31.3 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

I, Julie M. Howard, certify that: 

1.  I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Navigant Consulting, Inc., the registrant; and 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 

 

|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |
|                                       |
| /s/    JULIE M. HOWARD |
| Julie M. Howard                            |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer       |

 

April 30, 2018
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                                      -------------------------------------------
                                                         1994            1995            1996
                                                      -----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>             <C>
Earnings per Common and Common Equivalent Share:
Initial Public Offering Price.......................  $     16.00     $     16.00     $     16.00
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding During
  Period:...........................................    1,173,000       1,189,000       1,223,000
Shares of Common stock issued within the last twelve
  months preceding the initial filing date..........    1,272,000       1,272,000       1,272,000
Weighted Average Common stock issued subsequent to
  the initial filing date...........................           --              --       1,779,000
                                                      -----------     -----------     -----------
                                                        2,445,000       2,461,000       4,274,000
Common Stock Equivalents:
Common Stock options and warrants granted within the
  last twelve months preceding the initial filing
  date..............................................    1,375,000       1,375,000       1,126,000
Preferred Stock convertible into Common Stock and
  sold within the last twelve months preceding the
  initial filing date...............................    4,019,000       4,019,000       2,831,000
                                                      -----------     -----------     -----------
                                                        5,394,000       5,394,000       3,957,000
Weighted average Common and Common Equivalent
  Shares............................................    7,839,000       7,855,000       8,231,000
Net loss for period.................................   (1,115,000)     (3,352,000)     (3,483,000)
Loss per Share......................................        (0.14)          (0.43)          (0.42)
</TABLE>
In the Matter of DILLAHUNT.

No. 603P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

I. Joe Ivey, Wilson, for Noteholders.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of January 2005 by Petitioner (Norris Dillahunt) for "Notice of Appeal" to the N.C. Supreme Court of the Denial of the Writ of Supersedeas on December 20, 2004, for Lack of Jurisdiction and N.C. Rule 12, Sec. 11:

> "Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
STATE v. SUELL.

No. COA04-1183.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.1

The following certification is provided by the undersigned President and
Principal Executive Officer of Centrue Financial Corporation on the basis of
such officer's knowledge and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

In connection with the Annual Report of Centrue Financial Corporation. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Thomas
A. Daiber, President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                              /s/ THOMAS A. DAIBER
                    ----------------------------------------
                             Name: Thomas A. Daiber
                              Title: President and
                           Principal Executive Officer
                              Date: March 23, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41307]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14787]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP21-1042-004.
    Applicants: Rover Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: RP21-1042 Settlement Compliance 
Filing to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/6/22.
    Accession Number: 20220706-5043.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/18/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP21-441-007.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: RP21-441 Settlement Compliance 
Filing to be effective 8/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/6/22.
    Accession Number: 20220706-5039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/18/22.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified 
comment date.

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1043-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Remove Terminated Agreement--
7/31/2022 to be effective 8/5/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/5/22.
    Accession Number: 20220705-5045.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/18/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1044-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--UGI to DTE 
eff 7-2-22 to be effective 7/2/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/5/22.
    Accession Number: 20220705-5110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/18/22.

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1045-000.
    Applicants: NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Amended DTE 
860002 eff 07-01-22 to be effective 7/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 7/6/22.
    Accession Number: 20220706-5000.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/18/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: July 6, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-14787 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P