alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION





I, Joseph M. H. Irby, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005, of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this  report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and







---



5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  August 15, 2005



/s/ Joseph M. H. Irby

Joseph M. H. Irby

President
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Form****10-Q) of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (the “Company”), I, Joseph D. Borgerding, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,****hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (a) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | /s/ Joseph D. Borgerding | Date: August 14, 2009 |
|--------|--------------------------|-----------------------|

|   | Joseph D. Borgerding |
|--------|----------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Sign Media Systems, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonio
      F. Uccello, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.           The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August
      20, 2007





/s/
      Antonio F. Uccello, III


Antonio
      F. Uccello, III


Chief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of INTERNATIONAL CONSOLIDATED COMPANIES,
INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Antonio F. Uccello, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
May 20, 2008





/s/
Antonio F. Uccello, III


Antonio
F. Uccello, III


Chief
Executive Officer
ROBERTS v. COSTON

No. COA05-894

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 21, 2006

Certification Date April 10, 2006

Appeal from Henderson (03CVS1853).

Case reported without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
NO. 12-14-00066-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE

OF JERRY DAVIDSON, JR.

AND DANA M. NIEL

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 159TH 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

ANGELINA COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On March 17, 2014, Appellant filed a notice of appeal complaining of the trial court’s 

order evicting him from certain real property. On March 18, 2014, this court notified Appellant 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1, that the information received in this appeal 

does not contain a final judgment or other appealable order. Appellant was further informed that 

the appeal would be dismissed if the information received in the appeal was not amended on or 

before March 28, 2014, to show the jurisdiction of this court. The deadline for amendment has 

passed, and Appellant has neither responded to the March 18, 2014 notice nor otherwise shown 

the jurisdiction of this court. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 42.3.

Opinion delivered March 31, 2014.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 31, 2014

NO. 12-14-00066-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

JERRY DAVIDSON, JR. AND DANA M. NIEL

Appeal from the 159th District Court 

of Angelina County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. DV-01550-13-06)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the 

appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction; and that this decision 

be certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 50 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the African Elephant Conservation Act and 

the Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of 1994. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 50 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Multinational Species 

3 Conservation Funds Reauthorization Act of 2007’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION AND AMENDMENT OF AFRICAN 

5 ELEPHANT CONSERVATION ACT. 

6 (a) NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF PROJECT PROPOSAL.— 

7 Section 2101(c) of the African Elephant Conservation Act 

8 (16 U.S.C. 4211(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘and to each 

9 country within which the project is proposed to be con10 ducted’’. 

11 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—Section 2306(b) 

12 of the African Elephant Conservation Act (16 U.S.C. 

13 4245(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘$80,000’’ and inserting 

14 ‘‘$100,000’’. 

15 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

16 2306(a) of the African Elephant Conservation Act (16 

17 U.S.C. 4245(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘2001, 2002, 

18 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007’’ and inserting ‘‘2007 

19 through 2012’’. 

20 SEC. 3. REAUTHORIZATION AND AMENDMENT OF RHINOC21 EROS AND TIGER CONSERVATION ACT OF 

22 1994. 

23 (a) NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF PROJECT PROPOSAL.— 

24 Section 5(c) of the Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act 

25 of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 5304(c)) is amended in the third sen26 tence by striking ‘‘, to the Administrator, and to each 
3 

•HR 50 EH

1 country within which the project is to be conducted’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘and to the Administrator’’. 

3 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES.—Section 10(b) of 

4 the Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of 1994 (16 

5 U.S.C. 5306(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘$80,000’’ and 

6 inserting ‘‘$100,000’’. 

7 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

8 10(a) of the Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of 

9 1994 (16 U.S.C. 5306(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘2001, 

10 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘2007 through 2012’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 23, 2007. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 50 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the African Elephant Conservation 

Act of 1994. Act and the Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation
STATE v. PETERSON

No. COA04-1371

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed August 16, 2005

Certification Date September 6, 2005

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS52222).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | /s/ Larry M. Wright                                 |
|   |   | Larry M. Wright                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|   |   | May 17, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
STATE v. Abraham HARRISON.

No. 228A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 27, 2005.

M. Lynne Weaver, Assistant Attorney, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th day of October 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Abraham Harrison) shall have up to and including the 7th day of December 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 27th day of October 2005."
YALLUM v. HAMMERLE.

No. 513P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Sandra F. Yallum, Pro Se.

R. Locke Bell, for Dennis & Barbara Hammerle.

David W. Smith, III, Gastonia, for Moss & Moss Realty.

Jim R. Funderurk, for Alan G. Cloninger.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st day of August 2005 by Plaintiffs for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of November 2005."
Extension of Employment Agreement dated November 11, 2004, Alan Vituli


 Exhibit 10.30 
  
 2ND EXTENSION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 This
Extension of Employment Agreement (this “Agreement”) effective as of September 30, 2004, by and between CARROLS CORPORATION (“Employer”), a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware having an address at 968 James Street,
Syracuse, New York 13203 and ALAN VITULI whose principal residence is 789 Crandon Blvd., Suite 120, Key Biscayne, Florida 33149 (“Employee”). 
  

	 	1.	Employer and Employee previously entered into a certain employment agreement dated January 1, 1995, as amended April 3, 1996, as further amended and restated on March 27, 1997,
as further amended and extended on April 1, 2002 and as further extended on November 11, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”), which agreement is due to expire on December 31, 2005. 

  

	 	2.	Employer and Employee have agreed to extend the term of the Employment Agreement to December 31, 2006. 

  

	 	3.	The Carrols Corporation Compensation Committee has approved the extension of the Employment Agreement as herein provided. 

  

	 	4.	By this Agreement, the Employment Agreement is extended through December 31, 2006, upon all terms and conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement. 

  
 IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and have caused this
Extension of Employment Agreement to be executed as of November 1, 2004. 
  

			
	CARROLS CORPORATION
	
	 /s/ Joseph A. Zirkman

	 Name:
	 	 Joseph A. Zirkman

	 Title:
	 	 Vice President

	
	 /s/ Alan Vituli

	 Alan Vituli
EXHIBIT 32.1 CEO CERTIFICATIONS UNDER SECTION 906
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Marketing Worldwide, Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles Pinkerton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Charles PinkertonCharles PinkertonChief Executive OfficerMay 16, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,739
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             217
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,842
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     28,536
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,800
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,622
<LOANS>                                        169,106
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,315
<DEPOSITS>                                     186,730
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,134
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                250
<LONG-TERM>                                     16,964
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,946
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 223,315
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,808
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,916
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   415
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,139
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,250
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,139
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      880
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   9
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,561
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,404
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,404
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,266
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.66
<LOANS-NON>                                        344
<LOANS-PAST>                                        24
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,686
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      760
<RECOVERIES>                                        44
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,849
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,849
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### WILSON v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13819.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 24, 1953.

Robert G. Closterman, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Henry L. Hess, U. S. Atty., Maurice v. Engelgau, Asst. U. S. Atty., Portland, Or., Lynn J. Gillard, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before BONE, ORR, and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has renewed his application for admission to bail pending appeal, previous application to that end having been disallowed by both the District Court and by this Court. Upon argument before the Court appellant has urged that the appeal presents a substantial question.

Appellant was convicted and sentenced under the Act of November 2, 1951, Public Law 255, Ch. 666, 82nd Cong., First Sess., 65 Stat. 767, relating to the importation, transportation and sale of narcotic drugs. The appellant admitted two prior convictions and in consequence upon his conviction for the third offense, his punishment was fixed at imprisonment for the longer period of time prescribed in the Act. Appellant says that the substantial question is whether the Act referred to permits such an extended term of imprisonment to be imposed where the convictions as here were prior to the enactment of the Act. He *568
      *argues that the Act must be construed to*mean that the prior convictions therein referred to are convictions which took place after the Act was enacted; that if it be otherwise construed its application is ex post facto.

We think that the Act under which the appellant was tried and convicted clearly applied in his case notwithstanding his prior convictions antedated the *Aort.*The Act, so construed, is not subject to any constitutional infirmity. McDonald v. Massachusetts, 180 U.S. 311, 21 S.Ct. 389, 45 L.Ed. 542. We find no substantial question here present.

The application for admission to bail is denied.
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State 

v. Lee, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-7826.] 

NOTICE 

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an 

advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to 

promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 

South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other 

formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before 

the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2017-OHIO-7826

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. LEE, APPELLANT.

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as State v. Lee, Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-7826.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of State v. Aalim.

(No. 2016-0315―Submitted April 4, 2017―Decided September 27, 2017.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, 

No. 14AP-1009, 2016-Ohio-122. 

_________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of 

State v. Aalim, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2017-Ohio-2956, __ N.E.3d ___. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and O’DONNELL, KENNEDY, FRENCH, FISCHER, and 

DEWINE, JJ., concur. 

O’NEILL, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in State 

v. Aalim, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2017-Ohio-2956, __ N.E.3d ___, would reverse the 

judgment of the court of appeals pursuant to State v. Aalim, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

2016-Ohio-8278, __ N.E.3d ___, and would remand the cause to the juvenile court 

for an amenability determination consistent with R.C. 2152.12(B). 

_________________ 

Ron O’Brien, Franklin County Prosecuting Attorney, and Valerie B. 

Swanson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. 

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Sheryl Trzaska and Brooke M. 

Burns, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant. 

_________________