alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**  **AND**  **CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT
      OF 2002**





I,
      Charles J. Casamento, Chief Executive Officer and President of Osteologix,
      Inc.,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
      Osteologix, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
      of operations of Osteologix, Inc.





November
      10, 2006




By: /S/
      Charles J. Casamento





Charles
      J. Casamento


Chief
      Executive Officer and President











I,
      Matthew M. Loar, Chief Financial Officer of Osteologix, Inc., certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Osteologix, Inc. for the
      quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
      contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Osteologix, Inc.





November
      10, 2006





By: /S/
      Matthew M. Loar





Matthew
      M. Loar


Chief
      Financial Officer
Rebecca S. TAYLOR, Employee v. CAROLINA RESTAURANT GROUP, INC., Employer, The Hartford, Carrier.

No. 377A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 613 S.E.2d 510 (2005), affirming an Opinion and Award of the North Carolina Industrial Commission *493entered 2 April 2004. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 December 2005.

Poisson, Poisson & Bower, PLLC, by E. Stewart Poisson and Fred D. Poisson, Jr., Wadesboro, for plaintiff-appellee.

Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by Jaye E. Bingham and Erin F. Taylor, Raleigh, for defendant-appellants.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
CARL DEWAYNE SCOTT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3483

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 5, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie M. Kinsey, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant. 

Carl Dewayne Scott, pro se, Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
STATE v. WITSHER.

No. COA04-488.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Remanded for resentencing.
STATE v. KELLY.

No. COA05-486.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Johnston (03CRS59225, 04CRS1247).

Case without published opinion. No Prejudicial Error.
HomeOcean Facts

# What is nutrient pollution?

## Nutrient pollution is the process where too many nutrients, mainly nitrogen and phosphorus, are added to bodies of water and can  act like fertilizer, causing excessive growth of algae.

Nutrients can run off of land in urban areas where lawn and garden fertilizers are used. Pet and wildlife wastes are also sources of nutrients. To see how this happens, consider this visualization of the Chesapeake Bay, part of the largest watershed in the Northeast. This illustration shows the amount of suspended matter (e.g., silt, mud, debris) in waterways **before** (left) and **after** (right) areas in this region received exceptionally heavy rainfall in 2011. All of this rain and runoff eventually made its way into the Chesapeake Bay. 

This process is also known as eutrophication. Excessive  amounts of nutrients can lead to more serious problems such as low levels of  oxygen dissolved in the water. Severe algal growth blocks light that is needed  for plants, such as seagrasses, to grow. When the algae and seagrass die, they  decay. In the process of decay, the oxygen in the water is used up and this  leads to low levels of dissolved oxygen in the water. This, in turn, can kill fish,  crabs, oysters, and other aquatic animals. 

Nutrients come from a variety of different sources. They can occur  naturally as a result of weathering of rocks and soil in the watershed and they  can also come from the ocean due to mixing of water currents. Scientists are  most interested in the nutrients that are related to people living  in  the coastal zone because human-related inputs are much greater than natural  inputs. Because there are increasingly more people living in coastal areas, there are  more nutrients entering our coastal waters from wastewater treatment  facilities, runoff from land in urban areas during rains, and from farming.

All of these factors can lead to increased nutrient pollution.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
          - Eutrophication (audio podcast)
          - Nonpoint Source Pollution Education Tutorial

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Exhibit 10.39

 

FIRST AMENDMENT TO HOTEL PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO HOTEL PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of May 1, 2019 (the “Effective Date”), by and between LODGING FUND REIT III OP, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Purchaser”), and EAGAN LODGING INVESTORS II, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company (“Seller”).

 

RECITALS:

 

A.                                    Purchaser and Seller are parties to that certain Hotel Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of April 10, 2019 (the “Agreement”) with respect to the purchase and sale of the Hampton Inn located at 3000 Eagandale Place, Eagan, Minnesota 55121, as more particularly described in the Agreement; and

 

B.                                    Purchaser and Seller desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.

 

AGREEMENT

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Purchaser and Seller agree as follows:

 

1.                                      Effective Date.  Seller and Purchaser hereby agree that the Effective Date of the Agreement shall be April 11, 2019.

 

2.                                      Allocation of Purchase Price.  Pursuant to Section 5.i of the Agreement, Purchaser and Seller hereby agree that the allocation of the Purchase Price set forth on Exhibit D attached to the Agreement is hereby confirmed.

 

3.                                      Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.

 

4.                                      No Further Amendment. All remaining terms, conditions and provisions contained in the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.

 

5.                                      Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. The submission of a signature page transmitted by electronic transmission, including PDF via email, shall be considered an “original” signature page for the purposes of this Amendment.

 

[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]

 











 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.

 

	
 
    	
PURCHASER:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
LODGING   FUND REIT III OP, LP
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
Lodging   Fund REIT III, Inc., General Partner
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
  /s/   Dave Durell
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   Dave Durell
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   Chief Acquisition Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
SELLER:
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
EAGAN   LODGING INVESTORS II, LLC
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:   
    	
North   Central Group, Inc., Manager
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:   
    	
  /s/   David A. Lenz
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
David   A. Lenz, Founder and Chairman
    


 

2
STATE of North Carolina v. Masoud RASHIDI.

No. 510A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 617 S.E.2d 68 (2005), finding no prejudicial error in judgments entered 15 August 2003 by Judge Yvonne Mims Evans in Superior Court, Mecklenburg County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 December 2005.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Alexandra M. Hightower, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
96 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Raytheon $63.6 M

Systems Engineering Associates $56.6 M

BAE Systems $44.0 M

Northrop Grumman $36.1 M

McLaughlin Research Corp. $31.9 M

Mikel Inc. $26.1 M

L3 Technologies $24.6 M

Rite-Solutions $23.1 M

Hyman Brickle & Son Inc. $17.1 M

Asgard Partners & Co. LLC $15.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

RHODE ISLAND

#42 #21 0.3% $1,384 #41 #42 #35

$1.5 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.4% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,336 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$799.2 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,336

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Newport 2,507 4,469 98 953 8,027

Washington ND 264 1,268 40

Kent 28 69 988 ND

Providence 105 192 502 232 1,031

Bristol ND ND 180 ND

Construction: 1%

Research and 

Development: 11%

Service: 62%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 27%

Active Duty: 25%

Civilian: 41%

National 

Guard: 25%

Reserve:10%

4%

80%

6%

10%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

65%

11%

1%

$0.8

$0.6

$0.7

$0.6 $0.5

$0.7

$0.6

$0.7

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 97

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Washington

RHODE ISLAND FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Newport

Providence

Washington

Kent

Bristol

(M = millions)

$542.9 M

$54.9 M

$38.9 M

$24.0 M

$3.7 M

Newport

Washington

Providence

Kent

Bristol

$655.5 M

$55.5 M

$42.6 M

$33.1 M

$2.7 M

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Newport

Washington

Newport
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) AND SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Idaho General Mines, Inc., a Idaho Corporation, (the Company) hereby certifies to such officers knowledge that:



1.

This quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Idaho General Mines, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in this quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Idaho General Mines, Inc.



Date:  August 19, 2005

/s/ Robert L. Dumont

________________________________



Robert L. Dumont

Chief Financial Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5099 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to establish additional goals for 

airport master plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2008 

Mr. GRAVES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to establish 

additional goals for airport master plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AIRPORT MASTER PLANS. 

4 Section 47101 of title 49, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(i) ADDITIONAL GOALS FOR AIRPORT MASTER

7 PLANS.—In addition to the goals set forth in subsection 

8 (g)(2), the Secretary shall encourage airport sponsors and 

9 State and local officials to develop airport master plans 

10 that take into account— 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5099 IH

1 ‘‘(1) customer convenience and access to airport 

2 facilities; and 

3 ‘‘(2) threats of a terrorist attack, including the 

4 need to continually monitor and adjust plans to ad5 dress new terrorist threats.’’. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
# C_2017060EN.01000101.xml

| 24.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 17 February 2017

renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

(2017/C 60/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted by the Bulgarian government,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decisions of 14 July 2015 (2) and of 14 September 2015 (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2015 to 17 September 2018. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decisions of 14 July 2015 (2) and of 14 September 2015 (3), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2015 to 17 September 2018.

2

3

| (2) | A member’s seat is available for Bulgaria on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives as a result of the resignation of Ms Emilia VALCHOVSKA. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat is available for Bulgaria on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Government representatives as a result of the resignation of Ms Emilia VALCHOVSKA.

| (3) | The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2018, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The members of the Governing Board of the aforementioned Centre should be appointed for the remainder of the current term of office, which expires on 17 September 2018,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following person is hereby appointed member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of its term of office, which runs until 17 September 2018:

GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES:

| BULGARIA | Ms Maria TODOROVA |
| --- | --- |

BULGARIA

Ms Maria TODOROVA

Article 2

This Decision shall be published, for information, in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Done at Brussels, 17 February 2017.

For the Council

The President

E. BARTOLO

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 232, 16.7.2015, p. 2.

2

(3)  OJ C 305, 16.9.2015, p. 2.

3

---
STATE of North Carolina v. William VAN TRUSELL.

No. 278P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for William Van Trusell.

Karen A. Blum, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of May 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."
STATE of North Carolina v. Ronnie Lee KIMBLE.

No. 605P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Ronnie Lee Kimble, Pro Se.

*834William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 27th day of October 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."

Justice EDMUNDS recused.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1458 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1 Walter Hammond Place in Waldwick, New 

Jersey, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Joseph D’Augustine Post 

Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 1458 EH

1 SECTION 1. STAFF SERGEANT JOSEPH D’AUGUSTINE POST 

2 OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 1 Walter Hammond Place in 

5 Waldwick, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 

6 the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Joseph D’Augustine Post Office 

7 Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Staff Sergeant Joseph 

12 D’Augustine Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 17, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1458 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostJoseph D’Augustine Post Office Building’’. in Waldwick, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Staff Sergeant al Service located at 1 Walter Hammond Place
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Stratum Holdings, Inc. (the “smallbusiness issuer”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, D. Hughes Watler, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the small businessissuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of this Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the small business issuer.

 

 
|   | /s/    | D.  Hughes Watler, Jr. |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|   |   | D.  Hughes Watler, Jr. |
|   |   | Chief  Financial Officer    |
|   |   | May 12,  2008          |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5423 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5423

    To extend and modify the suspension of duty on polyisobutylene.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2008

 Mr. Ferguson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend and modify the suspension of duty on polyisobutylene.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLYISOBUTYLENE.

    (a) Reduction of Duty on Polyisobutylene.--Heading 9902.24.37 of 
the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 1-
Propene-2-methyl homopolymer) is amended--
            (1) in the general rate of duty column, by striking 
        ``Free'' and inserting ``3%''; and
            (2) in the effective period column, by striking ``12/31/
        2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 1, 2010.
                                 <all>
```