alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brian F. Lavin,President and Chief Executive Officer of NTS Realty Capital, Inc., themanaging general partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

 

1.                                       The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: | May 8, 2009                                    |     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|----------|
| Name:  | */s/ Brian F. Lavin*                                | * * |
|   | Brian F. Lavin                                      |     |
| Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer of            |     |
|   | NTS Realty Capital, Inc., the Managing General |     |
|   | Partner of NTS Realty Holdings Limited Partnership  |     |

 

The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Qas a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
HomeEducationCurrents

# Shallow Water Drifter

## Currents Tutorial

A Davis drifter is an instrument designed to  measure wind-driven surface currents. It has four major components: (1)  body, (2) sails, (3) floats, and (4) a data collection/transmitter  package. The body, which is a waterproof tube about 3 feet long and 10  inches wide, holds the collection/transmitter package. The sails extend  out from the body as four pairs of cloth or vinyl “arms” with about 3  square feet of total sail area. The sails move the drifter along with  the prevailing currents. The four floats are attached by ropes to the  body of the drifter, keeping it suspended a few feet beneath the  surface so that the drifter is not directly affected by the wind or  waves.

**Click on the images**

The drifter’s transmitter sends signals to a polar orbiting satellite that calculates its position and relays this information to a receiving  station. A typical drifter will transmit data for about one year before its power supply expires.

### Currents Lessons

              - Welcome
              - Tidal Currents 1
              - Tidal Currents 2
              Coastal Currents
              - Waves
              - Longshore Currents
              - Rip Currents
              - Upwelling
              Surface Ocean Currents
              - The Coriolis Effect
              - Surface Ocean Currents
              - Boundary Currents
              - The Ekman Spiral
              The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Thermohaline Circulation
              - The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Effects of Climate Change
              How Are Currents Measured?
              - Age of Exploration
              - What is a "knot"?
              - Shallow Water Drifter
              - Deep Ocean Drifter
              - Current Profiler
              - Shore-based Current Meters
              - How Currents Affect Our Lives?
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources
              - Subject Review

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of ZHONGPIN INC. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June
30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), Xianfu Zhu, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      August 10, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Xianfu ZhuXianfu
      ZhuChief
      Executive Officer




This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a. Committee on Professional Standards, Petitioner; Richard J. Giannone, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 161]

Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1991, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (273 AD2d 600 [2000]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts *(see*22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.
SUSI v. AUBIN.

No. COA05-1300.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 4, 2006.

Certification Date April 24, 2006.

Appeal from Davidson (01CVS2234).

Case without published opinion. Vacated.
Exhibit 31.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Frank S. DePaolo, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SE Financial Corp. (Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omitto state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the Registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls    and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures to be    designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating    to the Registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly    during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)), to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of Registrant’s board of directors:

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date: September 10, 2004 |   | __________________________    |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|                     |   | Frank S. DePaolo              |
|                     |   | President and CEO             |
|                     |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----
STATE v. HARRINGTON.

No. COA05-55.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Union (99CRS14021)

Case reported without published opinion Dismissed.
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8(Registration Nos. 333-123332, 333-58648, 333-59826, 333-82122, 333-104697 and 333-113299) of our reports datedMarch 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Introgen Therapeutics,Inc., Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Introgen Therapeutics, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the fiscalyear ended December 31, 2005./s/ Ernst & Young LLPAustin, Texas
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

NEHA PATEL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4488 ) RASESH PATEL ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed September 15, 2017.

A ppeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; William Sites, Judge.

William J. Lobb and Howardene Garrett of Law Office of William J. Lobb, Bartow, for A ppellant. Jean Marie Henne of Jean M. Henne, P.A., Winter Haven, for Appellee.

BLACK, Judge. We affirm the order on modification of final judgment of diss olution of marriage, which denies Neha Patel's motion to modify the final judgment as it relates to timesharing. Competent substantial evidence supports the trial court's finding that Ms. Patel met her burden of establishing a substantial, material, a nd unanticipated change in circumstances since the entry of the final judgment of disso lution of marriage. See- 2 - Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So. 2d 928, 934 (Fla. 2005) ("A decree f or purposes of the substantial change test includes both a decree that has incorporated a stipulated agreement concerning child custody and a decree awarding custody after an adversarial hearing."). And we find no error in the court's de termination that

modification was not in the child's best interests at the time of the evidentiary hearing. However, we remand with directions that the trial court strik e the language of paragraph eleven following its finding that it is not in the minor child's best interests to modify the current timesharing and parental responsibility "at this time." 1 The trial court may neither determine the child's best interests prospectively, see Eisele v. Eisele, 91 So. 3d 873, 874-75 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012), nor delegate its statuto ry duties to a parent or expert, Grigsby v. Grigsby, 39 So. 3d 453, 457 (Fla. 2d DCA 201 0). Future motions to modify the final judgment with regard to timesharing are govern ed by the statutory requirements to establish a "substantial, material, and unantic ipated change in circumstances" since entry of the final judgment—which has been met in this case—and

that "modification is in the best interests of the child." See § 61.13(3), Fla. Stat. (2016); see also Howell v. Howell, 207 So. 2d 507, 511-12 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968) (discussing the law of the case doctrine). Affirmed; remanded with instructions. SILBERMAN and CRENSHAW, JJ., concur.

1 We note that the modification order contains two paragraphs num bered eleven. Our direction on remand is specific to the second para graph eleven.
exv10w3



 






EXHIBIT 10.3




THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




          THIRD AMENDMENT dated as of July 29, 2005 (this “Amendment”) to EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated as
of February 13, 2003, as amended (the “Agreement”) by and between TRW Automotive Inc. (the
“Company”) and Joseph S. Cantie (“Executive”).




          WHEREAS, in order to extend the term of the Agreement, Executive and Company desire to amend
the Agreement as set forth below;




          In consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein, the parties agree as follows:




          1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the
meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.




          2. Amendment to Section 1.b. of the Agreement. Section 1.b. of the Agreement shall be
amended in its entirety to read as follows:





b. Subject to the provisions of Section 7 of this Agreement, Executive shall
be employed by the Company for a period commencing on the Effective Date and
ending on December 31, 2008 (the “Employment Term”) on the terms and subject
to the conditions set forth in this Agreement; provided, however,
that commencing with January 1, 2009 and on each January 1 thereafter (each
an “Extension Date”), the Employment Term shall be automatically extended
for an additional one-year period, unless the Company or Executive provides
the other party hereto 60 days prior written notice before the next
Extension Date that the Employment Term shall not be so extended.



          3. No Other Amendments; Effectiveness. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the
Agreement is ratified and confirmed in all respects. This Amendment shall be effective as of the
date hereof.




          4. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflicts of laws principles thereof.




          5. Counterparts. This Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be
an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same
instrument.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the day and
year first above written.



	 	 	 
	TRW Automotive Inc.
	 	Joseph S. Cantie
	 	 	 
	/s/ David L. Bialosky
	 	/s/ Joseph S. Cantie
	 
	 	 





By: David L. Bialosky





			
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President

General Counsel and Secretary
EX-10.1 AMENDMENT TO 2003 STOCK PLAN



 






Exhibit 10.1




SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE MOVIE GALLERY, INC.

2003 STOCK PLAN




          This Second Amendment to the Movie Gallery, Inc. 2003 Stock Plan is effective as of this 10th
day of June, 2005, with reference to the following facts:




          A.      The Board of Directors of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the “Company”) voted to amend the Company’s
2003 Stock Plan (the “2003 Plan”) to reserve an additional 3,500,000 shares of Company’s common
stock for future grants of awards under the 2003 Plan at a duly noticed meeting of the Board of
Directors held on March 17, 2005.




          B.      The stockholders of the Company duly and validly approved the amendment to the 2003 Plan to
reserve an additional 3,500,000 shares of Company’s common stock for future grants of awards under
the 2003 Plan at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company held on June 9, 2005 in Atlanta,
Georgia.




     Effective as of the date hereof, the 2003 Plan is hereby amended as follows:



     1.      Section 6 of the Company’s 2003 Plan, as amended to date, is hereby further amended and
restated in its entirety as follows:



     “6. STOCK




          The stock issued to Purchasers or subject to Options granted under the Plan
shall be shares of the Corporation’s authorized but unissued or reacquired Common
Stock. The aggregate number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan shall not
exceed the sum of (i) 4,837,525 Shares plus (ii) up to 2,830,224 additional Shares
representing the number of shares reserved for issuance under the Predecessor Plan
pursuant to “Options” (as defined therein) outstanding under the Predecessor Plan
as of the effective date referred to in Section 3 to the extent that such “Options”
expire or are terminated, in whole or in part, without being exercised. The number
of Shares subject to Options or other rights outstanding at any time shall not
exceed the number of Shares remaining available for issuance under the Plan. In the
event that any outstanding Option or other right for any reason expires or is
terminated, the Shares allocable to the unexercised portion of such Option or other
right may again be made subject to an Option or other right. No eligible person
shall be granted Options or other rights during any 12-month period covering more
than 250,000 Shares. The limitations established by this Section 6 shall be subject
to adjustment in the manner provided in Section 14 hereof upon the occurrence of an
event specified in that Section.”



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MOVIE GALLERY, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ S. Page Todd
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	S. Page Todd 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Executive Vice President
EXHIBIT 31.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Stephens, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10 QSB of Descorp, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the  period  covered by this
     quarterly report;

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in  this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
     respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and I have:

     a)   designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to ensure  that
          material  information  relating  to  the  registrant,   including  its
          consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
          entities,  particularly  during  the  period in which  this  quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b)   evaluated the  effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure  controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c)   presented in this report our conclusions  about the  effectiveness  of
          the disclosure  controls and procedures  based on our evaluation as of
          the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed,  based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of directors  (or
     persons performing the equivalent function):

     a)   all  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  which could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls; and

6.   I have  indicated  in this  report  whether or not there  were  significant
     changes in internal  controls or in other factors that could  significantly
     affect  internal  controls  subsequent  to  the  date  of our  most  recent
     evaluation,  including any  corrective  actions with regard to  significant
     deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  November 9, 2004


By: /s/ David Stephens
   ---------------------------
   David Stephens
   President and CEO