alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Brandon Cabbott JONES.

No. 130P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Brandon Jones.

Richard E. Slipsky, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael K. Lands, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of March 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
# L_2017144DE.01003702.xml

| 7.6.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 144/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 144/37

---

Berichtigung des Durchführungsbeschlusses (EU) 2016/1196 der Kommission vom 20. Juli 2016 zur Änderung der Anhänge der Entscheidung 2007/275/EG mit Verzeichnissen von Tieren und Erzeugnissen, die gemäß den Richtlinien 91/496/EWG und 97/78/EG des Rates an Grenzkontrollstellen zu kontrollieren sind

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 197 vom 22. Juli 2016
  )

Seite 26, Anhang Nummer 1 Buchstabe u zur Änderung von Anhang I der Entscheidung 2007/275/EG, Kapitel 96 Tabelle Spalte 3:

Anstatt:

„Leere Kapseln aus nicht gehärteter Gelatine zur Verwendung in der Tierernährung; spezielle Anforderungen für die Verfütterung sind in Anhang XIV Kapitel I Abschnitt 1 Tabelle 1 Reihe 5 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 142/2011 festgelegt.“

muss es heißen:

„Leere Kapseln aus nicht gehärteter Gelatine für Lebensmittel oder für die Tierernährung; spezielle Anforderungen für die Verfütterung sind in Anhang XIV Kapitel I Abschnitt 1 Tabelle 1 Reihe 5 der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 142/2011 festgelegt.“

Seite 27, Anhang Nummer 2 zur Änderung von Anhang II der Entscheidung 2007/275/EG, Tabelle Spalte 2 Reihe 2:

Anstatt:

„Pasta und Nudeln, die nicht mit verarbeiteten Fleischerzeugnissen vermischt oder gefüllt sind und die zu weniger als der Hälfte aus verarbeiteten Milch- und Eiprodukten bestehen und gemäß Artikel 6 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a dieser Entscheidung behandelt wurden.“

muss es heißen:

„Teigwaren und Nudeln, die nicht mit verarbeiteten Fleischerzeugnissen vermischt oder gefüllt sind und die zu weniger als der Hälfte aus verarbeiteten Milch- und Eiprodukten bestehen und gemäß Artikel 6 Absatz 1 Buchstabe a dieser Entscheidung behandelt wurden.“

---
#### LATIMER v. CRANOR, Superintendent of Washington State Penitentiary.

No. 13757.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

June 22, 1953.

George D. Latimer, in pro. per., for appellant.

Don Eastvold, Atty. Gen., State of Wash., Cyrus A. Dimmick, Asst. Atty. Gen., State of Wash., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and ORR, Circuit Judges.

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the-United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington, denying an application for habeas corpus by a state prisoner. A former application had been dismissed without prejudice because of a failure to exhaust state remedies.

Latimer was convicted on a charge of forgery in Stevens County, Washington, on August 31, 1937, and was given a sentence of twenty years. On May 16, 1951, he was-released on parole. On September 26, 1951, he was convicted in King County, Washington, on a: new charge of forgery and was sentenced thereunder. It is this sentence *569that is being attacked by the application for the writ. On May 5, 1952, the Washington State Board of Pardons and Paroles issued an order revoking the parole on the first judgment. At this stage of the proceedings, on January 6, 1953, the judgment appealed from was entered- — a dismissal of the application as premature because Latimer was serving a valid pre-existing sentence.

Subsequent to the district court’s decision, on March 28, 1953, the Superior Court in and for the State of Washington in and for Stevens County, Washington, granted Lati-mer’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and held that he had fully served his time under the 1937 judgment and returned him *to*prison to serve *only*the 1951 sentence. The Superintendent does not question its finality. Thus it would seem that the ground relied upon by the district court for dismissing the petition is no longer in existence.

In Sharpe v. Buchanan, 317 U.S. 238, 63 S.Ct. 245, 87 L.Ed. 238, the petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies when he applied for a writ in the federal courts. The district court denied the petition and the court of appeals affirmed on the sole ground that the state remedies had not been exhausted. Between the time of this latter judgment and the time of consideration by the Supreme Court, the petitioner exhausted his state remedies. The Supreme Court ordered the judgment vacated and remanded the cause for such further proceedings as the court of appeals deemed appropriate. We have held that it is the condition of the habeas corpus proceeding as it is in the appellate court which is determinative. Thomas v. Teets, 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 236. This is similar to the rule in ordinary appellate cases that an appellate court must consider any change of law or fact which has occurred since the judgment was rendered in disposing of a case. Patterson v. State of Alabama, 294 U.S. 600, 607, 55 S.Ct. 575, 79 L.Ed. 1082; Watts, Watts & Co. v. Unione Austriaca De Navigazione, etc., 248 U.S. 9, 21, 39 S.Ct. 1, 63 L.Ed. 100.

The judgment, is vacated and the case remanded to the district court for its consideration in view of the above state court’s decision.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5011 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5011

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Permethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2008

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Permethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.80 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
'use strict';
(function() {
	
	// CSR Setup
	var overrideCtx = {};
	overrideCtx.ListTemplateType = 100;
	overrideCtx.Templates = {};
	overrideCtx.Templates.Header = RenderHeader;
	overrideCtx.Templates.Item = RenderItem;
	overrideCtx.Templates.Footer = '';
	overrideCtx.Templates.OnPreRender = OnPreRender;
	overrideCtx.Templates.OnPostRender = OnPostRender;
	SPClientTemplates.TemplateManager.RegisterTemplateOverrides(overrideCtx);

	function GetUrl() {
		var url = _spPageContextInfo.siteAbsoluteUrl;
		return url;
	}

	// Creates <style> tag and adds classes;
	function AddCustomClasses() {
		var style = document.createElement('style');
		var link = document.createElement('link');
		var script = document.createElement('script');
		var head = document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0];
	}

	function RenderHeader(ctx) {
		var header = RenderHeaderTemplate(ctx);
		var div = document.createElement('div');
		div.innerHTML = header;
		return '<div class="osc-contactInfo">' + header ;
	}

	// Create each item
	function RenderItem(ctx) {
		var id = ctx.CurrentItem.ID;
		var title = ctx.CurrentItem['Title'];
		var phone = ctx.CurrentItem['PhoneNumber'];
		var phone2 = ctx.CurrentItem['PhoneNumber2'];
		var phone3 = ctx.CurrentItem['PhoneNumber3'];
		var fax = ctx.CurrentItem['WorkFax'];
		var email = ctx.CurrentItem['Email'];
		var address = ctx.CurrentItem['WorkAddress'];
		var city = ctx.CurrentItem['WorkCity'];
		var state = ctx.CurrentItem['WorkState'];
		var zip = ctx.CurrentItem['WorkZip'];

		var baseHtml =
			'<div class="card"> \
				<h6>{0}</h6> \
				<div class="phone"> \
					<div>{1}</div> \
					<div>{2}</div> \
					<div>{3}</div> \
				</div> \
				<div class="fax">{4}</div> \
				<div class="email">{5}</div> \
				<div class="address">{6}, {7}, {8}, {9}</div> \
			</div>';

			return String.format(baseHtml, title, phone, phone2, phone3, fax, email, address, city, state, zip);
			
	}

	function OnPostRender(ctx) {
		
	}

	function OnPreRender(ctx) {
		var t = setInterval(function() {
			if(window.jQuery) {
				clearInterval(t);
				
				var InEditMode =(document.getElementById('MSOLayout_InDesignMode').value == 1) ? true : false;
				if(!InEditMode){
					$('.osc-contactInfo').parents('.ms-webpart-zone').addClass('osc-contactZone');
					$('.osc-contactZone table[id*="Hero-"], .osc-contactZone table.ms-listviewtable, .osc-contactZone iframe, .osc-contactInfo>div:empty').remove();

					var phoneItem = $('.osc-contactInfo .phone>div');
					$(phoneItem).each(function() {
						
						if ($(this).is(':empty')) {
							$(this).addClass('empty');
						}

					});

					var faxItem = $('.osc-contactInfo .fax');
					$(faxItem).each(function() {
						
						if ($(this).is(':empty')) {
							$(this).addClass('empty');
						}

					});

					var emailItem = $('.osc-contactInfo .email');
					$(emailItem).each(function() {
						
						if ($(this).is(':empty')) {
							$(this).addClass('empty');
						}

					});

				}
			
			}
		},1);
		ctx.ListSchema.NoListItem = 'Add items to this list!';
	}
})();
SOUTH DAKOTA 

ηκε

ΨϬ͘ς^WEd/E

STATE 

ηκρ

ϭ͘ϭйK&^dd'W

Ϭ͘ϭй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

Ψςερ

PER RESIDENT 

ηκε

ΨϬ͘ϮKEdZd

SPENDING 

#47 

ε͕ρςϬEhDZK&

PERSONNEL 

ηκρ

ΨϬ͘κWZ^KEE>

SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ

ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗Ϭй ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗κй

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ ϮϮй

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐĂŶĚ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ϳκй

By Service 

Army 

9% 

Navy/Marines 

16% 

Air Force 

50% 

Other Defense 

25% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Reserve: 5% 

Active Duty: 36% 

National 

Guard: 44% 

Civilian: 15% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

43% 

Navy/Marines 

1% 

Air Force 

56% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

^ƚĞƌůŝŶŐŽŵƉƵƚĞƌƐ ΨϭϮϯ͘ϬD

ZŽƐĞŶďĂƵĞƌĞƚĞŝůŝŐƵŶŐƐǀĞƌǁĂůƚƵŶŐ Ψϭε͘ϭD

EĂƟŽŶĂůWƌĞƐƚŽ/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĞƐ Ψϭρ͘ςD

ůĂĐŬ,ŝůůƐŵŵƵŶŝƟŽŶ/ŶĐ͘ Ψϳ͘ϭD

&ŽƌĞƐƚWƌŽĚƵĐƚƐŝƐƚƌŝďƵƚŽƌƐ Ψϳ͘ϭD

ZĂǀĞŶ/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĞƐ/ŶĐ͘ Ψρ͘κD

>ĞŝĚŽƐ Ψκ͘ϬD

KŶĞŝĚĂEĂƟŽŶ Ψϯ͘κD

,^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ/ŶĐ͘ Ψϯ͘ϯD

sZDĞƚĂů^LJƐƚĞŵƐ ΨϮ͘εD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ΨϬ͘κ

&zϭϮ

ΨϬ͘ϯ

ΨϬ͘ϯ

&zϭϯ &zϭκ

ΨϬ͘Ϯ ΨϬ͘Ϯ ΨϬ͘Ϯ ΨϬ͘ϭ

ΨϬ͘ϭ

&zϭρ &zϭς &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Ψϯϳς͘εD/>>/KE ε͕ρςϬ

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

ŽƵŶƚLJ ĐƟǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

DĞĂĚĞ ϯ͕ϯϯε ϭϮ ϭϭϯ

DŝŶŶĞŚĂŚĂ Ϯϭ ϯςκ ϭ͕ρϭΘ

WĞŶŶŝŶŐƚŽŶ E ΘϮε ϳϮϮ

ƌŽǁŶ Ϭ E ϭςε

ŽĚŝŶŐƚŽŶ Ϭ E Ϯςε

,ƵŐŚĞƐ E κΘ ϭςϯ

ĞĂĚůĞ Ϭ Ϭ ϭΘϮ

ŚĂƌůĞƐDŝdž Ϭ ϯε ϭϭς

ĂǀŝƐŽŶ Ϭ κϳ ϭϬΘ

>ĂŬĞ Ϭ Ϭ ϭϯϮ

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

Ϯϭ ϯ͕κΘρ

ϯϭϯ Ϯ͕Ϯϭς

Ϭ E

ϭϬϮ E

Ϭ E

Ϭ E

Ϭ ϭΘϮ

Ϭ ϭρρ

Ϭ ϭρρ

Ϭ ϭϯϮ

ϭϬϬ KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
SOUTH DAKOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

ŽĚŝŶŐƚŽŶ

ĂǀŝƐŽŶ

ŚĂƌůĞƐDŝdž

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

ƌŽǁŶ

DĞĂĚĞ

ĞƵĞů

,ƵŐŚĞƐ

WĞŶŶŝŶŐƚŽŶ ƌŽŽŬŝŶŐƐ

>ŝŶĐŽůŶ

zĂŶŬƚŽŶ

hŶŝŽŶ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

hŶŝŽŶ

DĞĂĚĞ

DŝŶŶĞŚĂŚĂ

WĞŶŶŝŶŐƚŽŶ

ĞƵĞů

,ƵŐŚĞƐ

>ŝŶĐŽůŶ

ƌŽŽŬŝŶŐƐ

zĂŶŬƚŽŶ

ƌŽǁŶ

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ΨϭϮρ͘ϯD

Ψϯϯ͘ΘD

ΨϮε͘κD

ΨϮϳ͘ϬD

Ψϭρ͘ϳD

Ψϭ͘εD

Ψϭ͘κD

ΨΘΘϭ͘ε<

ΨΘϯϯ͘κ<

Ψρεϭ͘ϯ<

DĞĂĚĞ

WĞŶŶŝŶŐƚŽŶ

DŝŶŶĞŚĂŚĂ

,ƵŐŚĞƐ

ŽĚŝŶŐƚŽŶ

ƌŽǁŶ

ŚĂƌůĞƐDŝdž

>ŝŶĐŽůŶ

zĂŶŬƚŽŶ

ĂǀŝƐŽŶ

ΨϭΘς͘ϬD

Ψϳϯ͘εD

ΨςϮ͘ςD

Ψϳ͘ΘD

Ψρ͘ΘD

$4.7 M 

Ψκ͘ρD

$4.2 M 

Ψκ͘ϭD

Ψϯ͘ςD

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

DĞĂĚĞ

WĞŶŶŝŶŐƚŽŶ

ƌŽǁŶ

,ƵŐŚĞƐ

zĂŶŬƚŽŶ

>ŝŶĐŽůŶ

DŝŶŶĞŚĂŚĂ

DŝŶŶĞŚĂŚĂ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε ϭϬϭ
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD GEDDES and DELANIA

GEDDES, husband and wife,

 Plaintiffs - Appellants,

 v.

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Wells

Fargo Asset Securities Corporation,

Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,

Series 2006-15, a Delaware corporation;

MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC

REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.

(“MERS”), a Delaware corporation;

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA; WELLS

FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC.;

WELLS FARGO ASSET SECURITIES

CORPORATION, 

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-16550

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-00667-FJM

District of Arizona, 

Phoenix

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Frederick J. Martone, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 14, 2014 

FILED

FEB 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as

provided by Ninth Cir. R. 36-3.
San Francisco, California

Before: TALLMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and GARBIS, Senior

District Judge.** 

Richard and Delania Geddes brought a nine-count complaint in the Superior

Court of Maricopa County, Arizona, seeking to stop the non-judicial foreclosure of

their house after they defaulted on their loan payments. The case was removed to

federal court. The district court granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss under

Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Geddes v. HSBC Bank

USA, CV-12-0667-PHX-FJM, 2012 WL 1977277 (D. Ariz. June 1, 2012). The

Geddes appeal. Jurisdiction lies under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo,

Zadrozny v. Bank of New York Mellon, 720 F.3d 1163, 1167 (9th Cir. 2013), and

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

AFFIRMED.

 ** The Honorable Marvin J. Garbis, Senior United States District Judge for the

District of Maryland, sitting by designation.

2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AppleREIT Six, Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly represents, in all materialrespects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company asof September 30, 2009, and for the period then ended.

 
| /s/    GLADE M. KNIGHT |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| **Glade M. Knight**                        |   |
| **Chief Executive Officer**                |   |
|                                       |   |
| November 4, 2009                      |   |
|                                       |   |
| /s/    BRYAN PEERY     |   |
| **Bryan Peery**                            |   |
| **Chief Financial Officer**                |   |
|                                       |   |
| November 4, 2009                      |   |

 

1

----
Exhibit 4.1 Indenture


    Exhibit 4.1 - Indenture

     

    Please see PDF Version for text.

     

     

     

    FIRST
      VALLEY BANCORP., INC.

     

     

     

    By: 
      /s/ Robert L. Messier, Jr.

     Name: 
      Robert L. Messier, Jr.

     Title: 
      President & CEO

     

     

     

     

     

    WILMINGTON
      TRUST COMPANY,

        as
      Trustee

     

     

    By: 
      /s/ Geoffrey J. Lewis

     Name: 
      Geoffrey J. Lewis

     Title: 
      Financial Services Officer
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 132 (Tuesday, July 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 41359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14773]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: (22-052)]


NASA Advisory Council; STEM Engagement Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration announces a meeting of 
the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Engagement 
Committee of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This Committee reports to 
the NAC.

DATES: Monday, August 1 2022, 2:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m., Eastern Time.

ADDRESSES: Virtual meeting by dial-in teleconference and WebEx only.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Tara Strang, NAC STEM Engagement 
Committee, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546, (216) 410-4335, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b2f3a293a753675282f293a353c1b353a283a753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2c6d3c0d39cdf9cc1c6c0d3dcd5f2dcd3c1d39cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be held virtually and will 
be available telephonically and by WebEx only. You must use a touch 
tone phone to participate in this meeting. Any interested person may 
dial the toll free access number 415-527-5035, and then the access 
code: 2761 487 1481 followed by the # sign. To join via WebEx, use 
link: https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/nasaenterprise/j.php?MTID=m5eecf7216da57c61988d745c5b5ce1c1 and the meeting number and 
access code is 2761 487 1481 and the password is 3R9Mrnfnh@2 (case 
sensitive).
    Note: If dialing in, please ``mute'' your telephone. The agenda for 
the meeting will include the following:

--Opening Remarks by Chair
--STEM Engagement Updates on Topics of Interest
--STEM Engagement Partnerships
--Formulation of New Findings and Recommendations
--Other Related Topics

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on this date to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Carol J. Hamilton,
Acting Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-14773 Filed 7-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
24 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

ARKANSAS 

#40

$1.9 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#38 

1.3% OF STATE GDP

0.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$639

PER RESIDENT 

#40

$1.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#35

18,531 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#38 

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 5% 

Supplies and

Equipment: 85%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

4%

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

6%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 12%

National 

Guard: 47%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

59%

Navy/Marines

2%

Air Force

38%

Other Defense

1%

Research and

Development: 1% 

Service: 8%

75%

Active Duty: 21%

Civilian: 20%

Top Defense Contractors 

Aerojet Rocketdyne

Lockheed Martin

General Dynamics

LS Black Constructors/Loeffel Construction, JV

TransDigm Group

Ducommun

Reliable Contracting Group

Kimball & Thompson Produce Co.

HGL Construction, Inc.

National Presto Industries

(M = millions)

$591.3 M

$180.9 M

$120.6 M

$28.1 M

$20.8 M

$20.6 M

$15.4 M

$9.3 M

$8.1 M

$7.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.2

$0.7 $0.6 $0.6

FY14 FY15

$0.4 $0.3

FY18 FY19

$0.3

FY16

$0.2

FY17 FY20 FY21

$768.1 MILLION 18,531

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Pulaski 3,678 2,039 3,143

Sebastian 35 338 1,371

Benton 0 44 674

Jefferson ND 724 136

Washington 15 ND 334 

Craighead ND 21 256

Faulkner ND 33 75 

Pope ND 58 126

Union ND ND 70 

Garland ND 66 19 

Reserve

1,502

107 

161

0 

ND 

65

160

14 

123 

77 

Total

10,362

1,851

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

879 
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ARKANSAS 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Baxter

Craighead

Pope

Pulaski

Garland

Jefferson

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Benton Carroll

Pulaski

Jefferson

Ouachita

Calhoun

Columbia

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Ouachita

Calhoun

Pulaski

Jefferson

Benton

Washington

Madison

Carroll

Columbia

Sebastian

(M = millions)

$626.4 M

$296.2 M

$132.0 M

$19.6 M

$14.9 M

$14.5 M

$11.6 M

$9.0 M 

$8.6 M

$7.3 M 

Pulaski

Sebastian

Jefferson

Benton

Faulkner

Washington

Craighead

Garland

Pope

Baxter

$510.1 M

$65.6 M

$53.0 M

$20.7 M

$12.6 M

$10.5 M

$7.0 M 

$6.9 M

$6.6 M

$5.3 M

Washington Madison

Sebastian

Benton

Sebastian

Washington

Faulkner

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 2

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

5
**EXHIBIT 21.1**

**LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.**

Rofin-Sinar, Inc.

PRC Laser Corporation

PRC Laser Europe N.V.

Lee Laser, Inc. 

Rofin-Sinar Technologies Europe S.L.

Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH

Rofin-Baasel Japan Corp.

Rasant-Alcotec Beschichtungstechnik GmbH

CBL Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH

Carl Baasel Lasertechnik GmbH & Co. KG

Rofin-Baasel, Inc.

Wegmann-Baasel Laser und elektrooptische Geraete GmbH

Optoskand AB

PMB Elektronik GmbH

Rofin-Baasel Italiana S.r.l.

Rofin-Baasel France S.A.

Rofin-Sinar UK Ltd.

Rofin-Baasel UK Ltd.

Rofin-Baasel Benelux B.V.

Rofin-Baasel Singapore PTE Ltd.

Rofin-Baasel Espana S.L.

DILAS Diodenlaser GmbH

Rofin-Baasel Taiwan Ltd.

Rofin-Baasel Korea Co., Ltd.

Rofin-Baasel China Co., Ltd.

 

 

 

----