alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Colt Wohlers, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Midwest Uranium Corporation (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i)  | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the three months ending September 30, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|    
|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                             
|    



| |        |                            
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | By:    | /s/Colt Wohlers            
| | Name:  | Colt Wohlers               
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer    
| |        | And Chief Financial Officer
| | Date:  | November 4, 2008           





---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4924 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4924

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Crotonic Acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

  Mr. Spratt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Crotonic Acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROTONIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.04.10 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Crotonic Acid) is amended by 
striking the date in the effective period column and inserting ``12/31/
2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

THOMAS MAULDIN, ) 

 ) 

 Appellant, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D14-458 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Appellee. ) 

___________________________________ ) 

Opinion filed August 29, 2014. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Michael E. Raiden, Judge. 

Crystal McBee Frusciante, Jupiter, for 

Appellant. 

No appearance for Appellee. 

LaROSE, Judge. 

 Thomas Mauldin appeals the summary denial of his motion for 

postconviction relief. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850. He is serving a forty-year prison 

sentence for lewd and lascivious molestation of a victim less than twelve years old. See 

§ 800.04(5)(b), Fla. Stat. (2008). We affirmed his judgment and sentence on direct 

appeal. Mauldin v. State, 61 So. 3d 1125 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (table). Our mandate 

issued on or about June 15, 2011. 
- 2 - 

 On June 6, 2013, Mr. Mauldin, through counsel, signed and readied for 

mailing his motion for postconviction relief to the clerk of the court for filing.1 Finding the 

motion facially sufficient, the postconviction court ordered the State to respond. 

Adopting the State's response, the postconviction court denied Mr. Mauldin's motion on 

the merits.2 We affirm the postconviction court's order as to claims 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7. 

Because claims 1 and 3 were legally insufficient, however, the postconviction court 

should have given Mr. Mauldin an opportunity to amend those claims. See Spera v. 

State, 971 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 2007). Accordingly, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and 

remand with directions for the postconviction court to allow Mr. Mauldin the opportunity, 

if he can in good faith, to amend claims 1 and 3. 

 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. 

 

SILBERMAN and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur. 

 1Although the State and the postconviction court deemed the motion 

untimely, we cannot agree. The last day on which Mr. Mauldin could have filed his 

motion was on or about June 15, 2013. His counsel signed the motion on June 6, 2013, 

as reflected in the certificate of service. In a motion for rehearing entered after denial of 

Mr. Mauldin's motion on the merits as well as for untimeliness, counsel submitted an 

affidavit attesting to her having mailed the motion on June 7, 2013. Counsel has no 

explanation as to why the motion was not docketed until June 25, 2013. It is clear, 

however, that Mr. Mauldin retained counsel to represent him for postconviction 

purposes. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(b)(3) (extending time when retained counsel, 

through neglect, fails to timely file postconviction motion). We treat the motion as timely 

filed. 

2Interestingly, the postconviction court initially concluded that Mr. 

Mauldin's motion asserted facially sufficient claims for relief. Upon receipt of the State's 

response, the postconviction court apparently changed its mind and concluded that 

some of the claims were facially deficient.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Johannes C. Keltjens, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of ANGIODYNAMICS, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 9, 2010



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Johannes C. Keltjens                                
|Johannes C. Keltjens, President, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**





**CERTIFICATION**


Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZHONGPIN INC. (the
“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Yuanmei Ma, as Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:August
                9, 2007
            By:
            /s/ Yuanmei
              MaYuanmei
              MaChief
                Financial Officer


This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Appalachian Bancshares, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Tracy R. Newton, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Danny F. Dukes., Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|    |  |                                                                                   
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By: |  |                                                                                   
|    | 
|    |  | /s/ Tracy R. Newton                                                               
|    |  | Tracy R. Newton President and Chief Executive Officer March 28, 2008              
|    | 
|    |  | /s/ Danny F. Dukes                                                                
|    |  | Danny F. Dukes Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer March 28, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of PortaltoChina.com, Inc. on Form
10-QSB  for the quarter ended February 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the "Report"), I, Paul Fong, Chief
Executive  Officer,  President,  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



Date:  April  4,  2007     By: /s/ Paul Fong
                           Paul  Fong
                           President  &  Chief  Financial  Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5419 

To suspend temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing Imidacloprid: 

1-(6-Chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl-N-nitroimidazolidin-2-ylidene amine Z9: 

(9Z)-9-Tricosene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2008 

Mr. ETHERIDGE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on product mixtures containing Imidacloprid: 1-(6-Chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl-Nnitroimidazolidin-2-ylidene amine Z9: (9Z)-9-Tricosene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PRODUCT MIXTURES CONTAINING 

4 IMIDACLOPRID: 1-(6-CHLORO-3- 

5 PYRIDINYL)METHYL-N-NITROIMIDAZOLIDIN6 2-YLIDENEAMINE Z9: (9Z)-9-TRICOSENE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5419 IH

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Product mixtures containing 

Imidacloprid: 1-(6-Chloro-3- 

pyridinyl)methyl-Nnitroimidazolidin-2- 

ylideneamine Z9: (9Z)-9- 

Tricosene (CAS No. 

Imidacloprid: 138261–41–3, 

Z9: 27519–02–4) (provided 

for in subheading 

3808.91.25) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
STATE v. Leroy McNEIL.

No. 37A87-6.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 2, 2005.

Robert H. Hale, Jr., for McNeil.

G. Patrick Murphy, Special Deputy Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of April 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 2nd day of May 2005."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5050 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5050

            To suspend temporarily the duty on squaric acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2008

  Mr. Garrett of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            To suspend temporarily the duty on squaric acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SQUARIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00      3,4-dihydroxy-3-    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         cyclobutene-1,2-                                                   31/2011
                         dione (squaric
                         acid) (CAS No.
                         2892-51-5)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2914.40.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Conserve Water

Use less water so 

excess runo and 

wastewater will 

not ow into the 

ocean.

Reduce 

pollutants

Choose nontoxic 

chemicals and 

dispose of all 

chemicals properly.

Reduce waste

Cut down on 

what you throw 

away.

at home around town on the water

anywhere, anytime

Shop wisely

Choose 

sustainable 

seafood. Buy 

less plastic and 

bring a reusable 

bag.

Reduce vehicle 

pollution

Use fuel ecient 

vehicles, carpool 

or ride a bike.

Practice safe 

boating

Anchor in sandy 

areas far from 

coral and sea 

grasses. Adhere to 

“no wake” zones.

Respect habitat

Healthy habitat 

and survival go 

hand in hand. 

Treat with care.

Fish 

responsibly

Follow “catch 

and release” 

practices and 

keep more sh 

alive.

Use less 

energy

Choose energy 

ecient light 

bulbs and don’t 

overset your 

thermostat.

10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 oceanservice.noaa.gov

Volunteer

Volunteer for cleanups at the beach and in your community. You can get 

involved in protecting your watershed too!
Filed 11/9/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 206

Interest of S.J., minor child

Jaimee Towers, Assistant State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee

v.

S.J., child; M.D., mother, A.J., father; Maggie 

Anderson, the Executive Director of the North 

Dakota Department of Human Services, Respondents

A.J., father, Appellant

No. 20160307

Appeal from the Juvenile Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Connie Sue Portscheller, Judicial Referee.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Jaimee F. Towers, Ward County Assistant State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, N.D. 58106, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Interest of S.J.

No. 20160307

Per Curiam.

[¶1]The father, A.J., appeals from a juvenile court judgment terminating his parental rights in his child, S.J.  The juvenile court found the child is deprived and “has been in foster care . . . for at least four hundred fifty out of the previous six hundred sixty nights.”  N.D.C.C. § 27-20-44(1)(c); In re F.F., 2006 ND 47, ¶ 14, 711 N.W.2d 144.  The father argues the court should have pursued alternative placement options and not permanently terminated his parental rights.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner
IN RE K.E.C.

No. COA04-1036.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 19, 2005.

Certification Date May 9, 2005.

Appeal from Henderson (02J102).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                        Ex. 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-56621) and on Form S-8 (No's 333-84729,
333-84731, 333-84733 and 333-84735) of Ascent Pediatrics, Inc. of our report
dated February 17, 2000, except as to the information in the fourth
paragraph of note T, for which the date is March 13, 2000, relating to the
financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2000
Harry E. MUNN, Jr. v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY.

No. 567A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2006.

*271Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 617 S.E.2d 335 (2005), vacating an order denying plaintiff's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial entered 19 December 2003 by Judge J.B. Allen, Jr. in Superior Court, Wake County, and remanding for a new trial on damages only. On 3 November 2005, the Supreme Court allowed defendant's petition for discretionary review as to additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 15 February 2006.

Unti & Lumsden, L.L.P., by Michael L. Unti and Sharon L. Smith, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by John P. Scherer II and Kimberly D. Potter, Assistant Attorneys General, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue on direct appeal, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion. Further, we conclude that the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
STATE v. Chang YANG.

No. 705P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 21, 2005.

Kelly D. Miller, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Yang.

Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 21st day of December 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of December 2005."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5308 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini prepared or 

preserved by vinegar or acetic acid in concentrations at 0.5 percent or greater. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. PASCRELL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain pepperoncini 

prepared or preserved by vinegar or acetic acid in concentrations at 0.5 percent or greater. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PEPPERONCINI PREPARED OR PRE4 SERVED BY VINEGAR OR ACETIC ACID IN 

5 CONCENTRATIONS AT 0.5 PERCENT OR 

6 GREATER. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

9 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

10 new heading: 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5308 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Pepperoncini, prepared or 

preserved by vinegar or acetic 

acid in concentrations at 0.5 

percent or greater (provided 

for in subheading 

2001.90.38) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Abraham HARRISON.

No. 228A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 7, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 169 N.C.App. 257, 610 S.E.2d 407 (2005), finding no prejudicial error in defendant's trial which resulted in a judgment entered 30 September 2003 by Judge Richard L. Doughton in Superior Court, Guilford County. Heard in the Supreme Court 13 March 2006.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by M. Lynne Weaver, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

Lisa Miles and Mark Montgomery, Durham, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. *See Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co.,* 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002); *Robinson v. Byrd,* 356 N.C. 608, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

AFFIRMED.