Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2022 / Notices 41111 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

35481 (July 6, 2021); see also Certain Carbon and 

Alloy Steel Cut-To-Length Plate From Belgium: 

Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2021, 87 FR 34244 (June 6, 2022). 

1We collapsed Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind. 

L.L.C. and Noble Steel Industries L.L.C. (Noble 

Steel) together in the final results of the 2016–2017 

administrative review. See Circular Welded CarbonQuality Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2016–2017, 84 FR 44845 (August 27, 2019) 

(CWP from the UAE 2016–2017 Final Results). 

Because there is no information on the record of 

this administrative review that would lead us to 

revisit this determination, we are continuing to treat 

these companies as part of a single entity for the 

purposes of this administrative review. Moreover, 

in the Preliminary Results, we preliminarily found 

that Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind., L.L.C.-Branch1 (Ajmal Branch 1) is the successor-in-interest to 

Noble Steel. See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary 

Successor-In-Interest Determination for 

Determination for Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind. 

L.L.C.-Branch-1,’’ dated December 30, 2021. No 

party has challenged this determination for the final 

results. Accordingly, we continue to find that Ajmal 

Branch 1 is the successor-in-interest to Noble Steel. 

2Commerce previously determined that Universal 

is a single entity consisting of the following three 

producers/exporters of subject merchandise: 

Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, Ltd.; KHK 

Scaffolding and Framework LLC; and Universal 

Tube and Pipe Industries LLC (UTP). See Circular 

Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the United 

Arab Emirates: Affirmative Preliminary 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Postponement of Final Determination, 81 FR 36882 

(June 8, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum (PDM), unchanged in 

Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe from the 

United Arab Emirates: Final Determination of Sales 

at Less Than Fair Value, 81 FR 75030 (October 28, 

2016), and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. Because there is no information on 

the record of this administrative review that would 

lead us to revisit this determination, we are 

continuing to treat these companies as part of a 

single entity for the purposes of this administrative 

review. Additionally, we previously determined 

that THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC is the 

successor-in-interest to UTP. See CWP from the 

UAE 2016–2017 Final Results. 

3On December 30, 2021, we preliminarily found 

that TSI Metal Industries L.L.C. (TSI Metal) is the 

successor-in-interest to Tiger Steel Industries L.L.C. 

(Tiger Steel). See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary 

Successor-In-Interest Determination for TSI Metal 

Industries L.L.C.,’’ dated December 30, 2021. No 

party has challenged this determination for the final 

results. Thus, we continue to find that TSI Metal 

is the successor-in-interest to Tiger Steel. 

Accordingly, we will notify U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) of this determination and 

assign Tiger Steel’s company-specific case number 

and cash deposit rate to TSI Metal. 

4See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe 

from the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019– 

2020, 87 FR 930 (January 7, 2022) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying PDM. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Circular Welded CarbonQuality Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates: 

Extension of Deadline for Final Results of 2019– 

2020 Administrative Review,’’ dated April 25, 2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2019– 

2020 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Circular Welded Carbon-Quality 

Steel Pipe from the United Arab Emirates,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

7See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe 

from the Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the 

United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Duty Determination and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 91906 (December 

19, 2016) (Order). 

the Federal Register an initiation of the 

2020–2021 AD administrative review on 

CTL plate from Belgium and the 

preliminary results and partial 

rescission of the 2020–2021 AD 

administrative review on CTL Plate 

from Belgium.1 In these notices, we 

incorrectly spelled the company name 

of NLMK Verona SpA, a company for 

which Commerce initiated and 

subsequently rescinded an 

administrative review. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4) and 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i). 

Dated: July 5, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14706 Filed 7–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–520–807] 

Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel 

Pipe From the United Arab Emirates: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019–2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

producers and/or exporters subject to 

this administrative review made sales of 

subject merchandise at prices less than 

normal value during the period of 

review (POR), December 1, 2019, 

through November 30, 2020. 

DATES: Applicable July 11, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Benjamin A. Luberda or Steven Seifert, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office II, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2185 or 

(202) 482–3350, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

This review covers five producers/ 

exporters of the subject merchandise. 

Commerce selected two mandatory 

respondents for individual examination: 

Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind. L.L.C./ 

Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes Ind. L.L.C.- 

Branch-1 (collectively, Ajmal) 1 and 

Universal Tube and Plastic Industries, 

Ltd./THL Tube and Pipe Industries LLC/ 

KHK Scaffolding and Formwork LLC 

(collectively, Universal).2 The 

producers/exporters not selected for 

individual examination are Conares 

Metal Supply Limited, TSI Metal 

Industries L.L.C.,3 and K.D. Industries 

Inc. 

On January 7, 2022, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.4 On 

April 25, 2022, we postponed the final 

results until July 1, 2022.5 A summary 

of the events that occurred since 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results, as well as a full discussion of 

the issues raised by interested parties 

for these final results, may be found in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum.6

The Issues and Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 7

The merchandise subject to the order 

is welded carbon-quality steel pipes and 

tube, of circular cross-section, with an 

outside diameter not more than nominal 

16 inches (406.4 mm), regardless of wall 

thickness, surface finish, end finish, or 

industry specification, and generally 

known as standard pipe, fence pipe and 

tube, sprinkler pipe, or structural pipe 

(although subject product may also be 

referred to as mechanical tubing). The 

products subject to this order are 

currently classifiable in Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) statistical reporting numbers 

7306.19.1010, 7306.19.1050, 

7306.19.5110, 7306.19.5150, 

7306.30.1000, 7306.30.5015, 

7306.30.5020, 7306.30.5025, 

7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, 

7306.30.5055, 7306.30.5085, 

7306.30.5090, 7306.50.1000, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
41112 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2022 / Notices 

8For a complete description of the scope of the 

order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

9See the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

10When Commerce’s individual examination of 

respondents is limited to two respondents, 

Commerce normally calculates: (A) a weighted 

average of the estimated weighted-average dumping 

margins calculated for the individually-examined 

respondents; (B) a simple average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins calculated for 

the individually-examined respondents; and (C) a 

weighted average of the estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins calculated for the individuallyexamined respondents using each company’s 

publicly-ranged U.S. sales quantities of subject 

merchandise. Commerce then compares then 

compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects either the 

(B) or (C) rate based on the rate closest to (A) as 

the most appropriate rate for companies not 

selected for individual examination, as using the 

(A) rate would result in the disclosure of business 

proprietary information. See, e.g., Ball Bearings and 

Parts Thereof from France, Germany, Italy, Japan, 

and the United Kingdom: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final 

Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and 

Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 

(September 1, 2010). In this review, Commerce 

based the rate for companies not selected for 

individual examination on the publicly-ranged 

sales data of the mandatory respondents. For an 

analysis of the data, see Memorandum, ‘‘Calculation 

of the All-Others Rate for the Final Results,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice. 

11For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

7306.50.5030, 7306.50.5050, and 

7306.50.5070. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and for customs purposes, the written 

product description remains 

dispositive.8

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by interested parties 

to this administrative review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. For a list of issues raised 

by parties, see the appendix to this 

notice. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties regarding the Preliminary 

Results, we made certain changes to the 

preliminary weighted-average margin 

calculations for Ajmal, Universal, and 

the non-examined companies.9

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

weighted-average dumping margin to be 

applied to companies not selected for 

individual examination when 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis (i.e., less 

than 0.5 percent), or determined entirely 

on the basis of facts available. 

For the final results, Commerce 

calculated estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins for Ajmal and 

Universal that are not zero, de minimis, 

or based entirely on facts otherwise 

available. Accordingly, Commerce has 

continued to calculate the rate for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination using a weighted average of 

the margins calculated for Ajmal and 

Universal, weighted by each 

respondent’s publicly-ranged total U.S. 

sales quantity.10

Final Results of the Review 

We are assigning the following 

weighted-average dumping margins to 

the firms listed below for the period 

December 1, 2019, through November 

30, 2020: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Ajmal Steel Tubes & Pipes 

Ind. L.L.C./Ajmal Steel 

Tubes & Pipes Ind. L.L.C.- 

Branch-1 ............................ 2.27 

Universal Tube and Plastic 

Industries, Ltd./THL Tube 

and Pipe Industries LLC/ 

KHK Scaffolding and 

Formwork LLC .................. 3.54 

Conares Metal Supply Limited .................................... 2.77 

TSI Metal Industries L.L.C .... 2.77 

K.D. Industries Inc ................ 2.77 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed within five days of the date 

of publication of this notice to parties in 

this proceeding, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

because Ajmal and Universal reported 

the entered value of their U.S. sales, we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales for which 

entered value was reported. 

For the companies that were not 

selected for individual review, we will 

assign an assessment rate based on the 

methodology descried in the ‘‘Rate for 

Non-Examined Companies’’ section, 

above. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by companies included in these final 

results of review for which the reviewed 

companies did not know that the 

merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.11

We intend to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for each specific 

company listed above will be that 

established in the final results of this 

review, except if the rate is less than 

0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis 

within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated companies not 

subject to this review, the cash deposit 

will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 131 / Monday, July 11, 2022 / Notices 41113 

12See Circular Welded Carbon-Quality Steel Pipe 

from the Sultanate of Oman, Pakistan, and the 

United Arab Emirates: Amended Final Affirmative 

Antidumping Duty Determination and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 91906, 91908 

(December 19, 2016). 

firm covered in this review, or a 

previous segment, but the manufacturer 

is, then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recent 

segment for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 5.95 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.12 These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: July 1, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Final Successor-in-Interest Determination 

V. Margin Calculations 

VI. Discussion of the Issue 

Comment: Selection of the Correct 

Universes of Sales for Ajmal for the 

Period of Review (POR) 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–14610 Filed 7–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[RTID 0648–XC160] 

New England Fishery Management 

Council; Public Meeting 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery 

Management Council (Council) is 

scheduling a public meeting of its 

Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management 

(EBFM) Committee to consider actions 

affecting New England fisheries in the 

exclusive economic zone (EEZ). 

Recommendations from this group will 

be brought to the full Council for formal 

consideration and action, if appropriate. 

DATES: This webinar will be held on 

Tuesday, July 26, 2022, at 9:30 a.m. 

Webinar registration URL information: 

https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/ 

register/609258508760430607. 

ADDRESSES:

Council address: New England 

Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 

Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, 

New England Fishery Management 

Council; telephone: (978) 465–0492. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Agenda 

The EBFM Committee will meet 

receive updates on and discuss the 

following issues: (1) Preparation for 

public information workshops on 

Ecosystem-Based Fishery Management 

for Georges Bank, and (2) Prototype 

Management Strategy Evaluation of 

Georges Bank Ecosystem-Based Fishery 

management strategies. The Committee 

will discuss other business including 

discussions with NOAA Fisheries 

leadership about National Standard 1 

concerns about stock complex catch 

limit management proposed in the 

example Fishery Ecosystem Plan. They 

may also discuss development of 2023 

management priorities. 

Although non-emergency issues not 

contained on the agenda may come 

before this Council for discussion, those 

issues may not be the subject of formal 

action during this meeting. Council 

action will be restricted to those issues 

specifically listed in this notice and any 

issues arising after publication of this 

notice that require emergency action 

under section 305(c) of the MagnusonStevens Act, provided the public has 

been notified of the Council’s intent to 

take final action to address the 

emergency. The public also should be 

aware that the meeting will be recorded. 

Consistent with 16 U.S.C. 1852, a copy 

of the recording is available upon 

request. 

Special Accommodations 

This meeting is physically accessible 

to people with disabilities. Requests for 

sign language interpretation or other 

auxiliary aids should be directed to 

Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, at 

(978) 465–0492, at least 5 days prior to 

the meeting date. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. 

Dated: July 6, 2022. 

Tracey L. Thompson, 

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14681 Filed 7–8–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[RTID 0648–XC158] 

Pacific Fishery Management Council; 

Public Meetings 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of public meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery 

Management Council’s (Pacific Council) 

Ad Hoc Marine Planning Committee 

(MPC) will hold a public meeting. 

DATES: The meeting will be held 

Tuesday, July 26, 2022, from 10 a.m. to 

4 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time or until 

business for the day has been 

completed. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES