alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE
COMPANY'S 1999 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,356
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,360
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,981
<PP&E>                                         115,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                (22,789)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,243
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,470
<BONDS>                                         44,035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,634
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   119,243
<SALES>                                        106,348
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,634
<CGS>                                           76,652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,713
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,745
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,524
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,701
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,823
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,823
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33


</TABLE>
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5328 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 ENTRIES OF TRUCK TIRES. 

5 (a) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION REQUIRED.— 

6 Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff Act 

7 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520), or any other provi8 sion of law, U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall, 

9 not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act— 

11 (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty each 

12 entry described in subsection (b) containing any 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5328 IH

1 merchandise which, at the time of original liquida2 tion, was merchandise eligible for duty-free treat3 ment under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

4 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.); and 

5 (2) refund any duties and interest paid on such 

6 entries. 

7 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

8 subsection (a) are the following: 

Port Code Entry Number Date of Entry 

1603 669–1383779–6 04/13/2004 

1603 669–1384048–5 04/27/2004 

1603 669–1383823–2 04/21/2004 

1603 669–1384049–3 04/27/2004 

1603 669–1384232–5 05/05/2004 

1603 669–1384416–4 05/12/2004 

1603 669–1384634–2 05/19/2004 

1603 669–1384781–1 05/26/2004 

1603 669–1385000–5 06/02/2004 

1603 669–1385136–7 06/09/2004 

1603 669–1385346–2 06/15/2004 

1603 669–1385519–4 06/22/2004 

1603 669–1385732–3 06/30/2004 

1603 669–1385864–4 07/06/2004 

1603 669–1386051–7 07/13/2004 

1603 669–1386223–2 07/20/2004 

1603 669–1386393–3 07/28/2004 

1603 669–1386639–9 08/04/2004 

1603 669–1386775–1 08/11/2004 

1603 669–1387022–7 08/18/2004 

1603 669–1387151–4 08/25/2004 

1603 669–1387392–4 09/01/2004 

1603 669–1387554–9 09/08/2004 

1603 669–1387722–2 09/14/2004 

1603 669–1387912–9 09/22/2004 

1603 669–1388090–3 09/29/2004 

1603 669–1388287–5 10/06/2004 

1603 669–1388471–5 10/13/2004 

1603 669–1388709–8 10/20/2004 

1603 669–1388912–8 10/27/2004 

1603 669–1389054–8 11/02/2004 

1603 669–1389270–0 11/10/2004 

1603 669–1389428–4 11/17/2004 

1603 669–1389571–1 11/24/2004 

1603 669–1389715–4 11/30/2004 

1603 669–1389863–2 12/07/2004 

1603 669–1390055–2 12/15/2004 

1603 669–1390207–9 12/21/2004 

1603 669–1390316–8 12/28/2004 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5328 IH

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Richard STROUD v. WILLIAMS, ROBERTS, YOUNG, INC., a North Carolina Corporation.

No. 420P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Kristine M. Howard, W.R. Loftis, Jr., Winston-Salem, for Williams, Roberts, Young, Inc.

Robert B. Laws, Winston-Salem, for Richard Stroud.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of August 2005 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
# L_2012253EN.01001701.xml

| 20.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 253/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 253/17

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 853/2012

of 19 September 2012

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of September 2012 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 for poultrymeat

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat (3), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of September 2012 for the subperiod from 1 October to 31 December 2012 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged for the subperiod from 1 October to 31 December 2012 under Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 September 2012.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 September 2012.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

3

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Order No | Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.10.2012-31.12.2012
  (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 09.4410 | 0,30601 |
| 2 | 09.4411 | 0,338411 |
| 3 | 09.4412 | 0,333262 |
| 4 | 09.4420 | 0,432525 |
| 6 | 09.4422 | 0,437276 |

Group No

Order No

Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.10.2012-31.12.2012

(%)

1

09.4410

0,30601

2

09.4411

0,338411

3

09.4412

0,333262

4

09.4420

0,432525

6

09.4422

0,437276

---
##### 



Exhibit 12
 MSW ENERGY HOLDINGS II LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Unaudited, in thousands)
 For the Period from
    
    
    For the Period from
    
    
    For the NineJune 25 through
    
    
    January 1 through
    
    
    Months EndedSeptember 30, 2005
    
    
    June 24, 2005
    
    
    September 30, 2004EARNINGS:Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations for
minority interest in consolidated subsidiary
    
    $
    35,136
    
    
    $
    (1,691
    )
    
    $
    39,329Less earnings attributable to Ref-Fuel prior to consolidation
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (6,148
    )$
    35,136
    
    
    $
    (1,691
    )
    
    $
    33,181Add (deduct):Fixed charges
    
    
    17,083
    
    
    
    30,358
    
    
    
    32,889Distributed earnings of Covanta Ref-Fuel Holdings prior
to consolidation
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    31,500Earnings, as adjusted
    
    $
    52,219
    
    
    $
    28,667
    
    
    $
    97,570FIXED CHARGES:Interest expense
    
    $
    17,083
    
    
    $
    30,358
    
    
    $
    32,889Fixed charges
    
    $
    17,083
    
    
    $
    30,358
    
    
    $
    32,889RATIO OF EARNINGS
TO FIXED CHARGES:
    
    
    3.06
    x
    
    
    0.94
    x
    
    
    2.97
    x
 31
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of B&G Foods, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 2, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David L. Wenner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Robert C. Cantwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ David L. Wenner     |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David L. Wenner         |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| April 26, 2011     |   |
|                    |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Robert C. Cantwell  |   |
| Robert C. Cantwell      |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |
| April 26, 2011     |   |

 

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
1. Home
2. Facts
3. How important is the ocean to our economy?

**How important is the ocean to our economy?**  The ocean is the **trading route for the planet**. Port of Seattle*In 2017, the U.S. maritime transportation system carried $1.6 trillion of cargo through U.S. seaports to and from our international trading partners.*  The U.S. economy is very dependent on healthy coastal and ocean resources. Consider the following facts: **Fourteen percent** of U.S. counties that are adjacent to the coast produce **45 percent** of the nation's gross domestic product (GDP), with over **three million jobs** (one in 45) directly dependent on the resources of the oceans and Great Lakes.
            
				In 2017, the ocean economy, which includes six economic sectors that depend on the ocean and Great Lakes, contributed **$307 billion** to the U.S. GDP and supported **3.3 million jobs**.
            
				Tourism and recreation account for **73 percent** of the ocean economy's total employment and **42 percent** of its GDP. Offshore mineral extraction accounts for another **25 percent** of the ocean economy's GDP.
  More **Information** Economics: National Ocean Watch ENOW Explorer NOAA Report on the Marine Economy NOAA's Econ 120: Two Minute Economic Lessons Fast Facts: Tourism and Recreation   Get **Social** Social
  **Last updated:** 12/05/23 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
---

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Harvey Smith, President, and Bill Dynes, Secretary,
  Treasurer and CFO of Midwest Uranium Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant
  to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Midwest Uranium
        Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the "Report")
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of Midwest Uranium Corporation                                                                         

Dated: November 19, 2007

*/s/ Harvey Smith*
  Harvey Smith, President
  (Principal Executive Officer)

*/s/ Bill Dynes*
  Bill Dynes
  Secretary, Treasurer and CFO
  (Principal Financial Officer and
  Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
  the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
  written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Midwest Uranium
  Corporation and will be retained by Midwest Uranium Corporation and furnished
  to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IN RE J.B.

No. COA04-1325

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Rockingham (03J88, 03J89).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# L_2017111EN.01001101.xml

| 28.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 111/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 111/11

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2017/744

of 25 April 2017

appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of Belgium, of the European Economic and Social Committee

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 September 2015 and 1 October 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020.

| (2) | A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Bernard NOËL, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Bernard NOËL,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Olivier VALENTIN, Secrétaire national de la CGSLB-ACLVB, is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2020.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 25 April 2017.

For the Council

The President

I. BORG

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 September 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 October 2015 appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2015 to 20 September 2020 (OJ L 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23).

2

---
STATE v. Melvin James HARDY.

No. 169A99-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 28, 2006.

Jonathan P. Babb, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Mark Kleinschmidt, for Melvin Hardy.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of February 2006 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Response to State's Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Melvin Hardy) shall have up to and including the 1st day of March 2006 to file and serve his/her response with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 28th day of February 2006."
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-40111

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ISRAEL ESTRADA-INFANTE

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CR-735-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Israel Estrada-Infante (Estrada) appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea to illegal reentry. He argues that his sentence was unreasonable

because the district court failed to consider his family ties and obligations and

his rehabilitative efforts.

Estrada, however, has been released from federal custody and removed

from the United States, leaving him subject only to an undischarged term of

supervised release. Because Estrada has requested relief in the form of

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 21, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-40111

2

resentencing, relief we cannot grant, his appeal is moot. See United States v.

Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 383 (5thCir.), petition for cert. filed, (June 25,

2007) (No. 06-12082). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
In the Matter of P.L.P.

No. 521A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2006.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 618 S.E.2d 241 (2005), affirming a judgment terminating respondent's parental rights entered 23 March 2004 by Judge Peter L. Roda in District Court, Buncombe County. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 February 2006.

Charlotte W. Nallan, Asheville, for petitioner-appellee Buncombe County Department of Social Services.

M. Victoria Jayne, Hickory, for respondent-appellant father.

Judy N. Rudolph, Asheville, for appellee Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
IN RE C.W.

No. COA05-929.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 18, 2006.

Certification Date May 8, 2006.

Appeal from the Harnett, (03J85, 03J86).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
HomeOcean Facts

# What is the largest ocean basin on Earth?

## The Pacific Ocean is the largest and deepest of the world ocean basins.

The 'Ring of Fire' is defined by a nearly continuous series of oceanic trenches, island arcs, and volcanic mountain ranges and/or boundaries of several plates. It encircles the periphery of the Pacific Ocean Basin. (image courtesy of COMET® program)

Covering approximately 63 million square miles and containing more than half of the free water on Earth,  the Pacific is by far the largest of the world’s ocean basins. All of the  world’s continents could fit into the Pacific basin.

The Pacific is the oldest of the existing ocean basins. Its  oldest rocks have been dated at about 200 million years. The Pacific basin is  referred to as the “Ring of Fire” due to intense earthquake and volcanic  activity occurring near areas of tectonic plate subduction (where one tectonic  plate is forced under another).

The Atlantic basin is the second largest basin, followed by  the Indian Ocean basin, the Southern Ocean, and finally the Arctic Ocean  basin.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - Volumes of the World's Oceans

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -