alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Supervisory Board and Shareholders of
Fresenius Medical Care Aktiengesellschaft
Hof an der Saale, Germany:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
on Form S-8 of Fresenius Medical Care Aktiengesellschaft of our report dated
February 11, 2004 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Fresenius
Medical Care Aktiengesellschaft and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and
2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and
shareholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, which appears
in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 20-F of Fresenius Medical Care
Aktiengesellschaft.

/s/ KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Frankfurt am Main, Germany
March 1, 2005
Exhibit 10.5


    
      

    


    Exhibit
      10.5

    TERMINATION
      AGREEMENT

    


    


    THIS
      TERMINATION AGREEMENT is entered into and effective as of July 25, 2005, by
      and
      between IFT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and MICHAEL
      T.
      ADAMS (the “Executive”).

    


    W
      I T N E
      S S E T H:

    


    WHEREAS,
      Company and Executive entered into that certain Executive Employment Agreement
      (the “Employment Agreement”) effective February 1, 2005;

    


    WHEREAS,
      Company and Executive wish to make substantial amendments to said Employment
      Agreement, which amendments taken together with the original Employment
      Agreement, will likely be confusing and difficult for the Company’s stockholders
      to read and understand as a whole; and

    


    WHEREAS,
      Company and Executive are desirous of terminating said Employment Agreement,
      in
      the interest of transparency to the Company’s stockholders, to permit the
      Company and Executive to enter into a new executive employment
      agreement.

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree that the Employment Agreement
      effective February 1, 2005, between the Company and Executive, is hereby
      terminated.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Termination Agreement as
      of
      the date first above written.

    


    


    
      	 	 	 	
              IFT
                CORPORATION

            	 
	 	
              WITNESS

            	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
              /s/
                Tiffany Wells

            	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	
              By:
                

            	
              /s/
                Richard J. Kurtz

            	 
	 	
              Tiffany
                Wells

            	 	
              Name:
                Richard J. Kurtz

            	 
	 	 	 	
              Title:
                Chairman of the Board

            	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
              WITNESS

            	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
              /s/
                Kelly Shannon-Hicks

            	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	
              By:
                

            	
              /s/
                Michael T. Adams

            	 
	 	
              Kelly
                Shanon-Hicks

            	 	
              Name:
                Michael T. Adams
# L_2017067EN.01008701.xml

| 14.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 67/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 67/87

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2017/444

of 9 March 2017

electing the President of the European Council

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15(5) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 30 August 2014, by European Council Decision 2014/638/EU (1), Mr Donald TUSK was elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 December 2014 until 31 May 2017. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 30 August 2014, by European Council Decision 2014/638/EU (1), Mr Donald TUSK was elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 December 2014 until 31 May 2017.

| (2) | In accordance with the Treaty on European Union, the holder of the office of President of the European Council may be re-elected once, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with the Treaty on European Union, the holder of the office of President of the European Council may be re-elected once,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Donald TUSK is hereby re-elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 June 2017 until 30 November 2019.

Article 2

This Decision shall be notified to Mr Donald TUSK by the Secretary-General of the Council.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 March 2017.

For the European Council

The President

D. TUSK

---

(1)  European Council Decision 2014/638/EU of 30 August 2014 electing the President of the European Council (OJ L 262, 2.9.2014, p. 5).

1

---
EXHIBIT 31

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Robert G.
Gwin, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 10-K of ProsoftTraining;



2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the
financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to
be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on
such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this
report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: October 28, 2004



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/    ROBERT G. GWIN                              
|Robert G. Gwin                                     
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
# L_2012075EN.01000501.xml

| 15.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 75/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 75/5

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 219/2012

of 14 March 2012

correcting the Romanian version of Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 315/93 of 8 February 1993 laying down Community procedures for contaminants in food (1), and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Romanian language version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 (2) contains three errors which should be corrected. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Romanian language version of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 (2) contains three errors which should be corrected.

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 should therefore be corrected accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(Concerns only the Romanian language version.)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 March 2012.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 37, 13.2.1993, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 364, 20.12.2006, p. 5.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1




              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Chilco River  Holdings  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tom
Yu Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Principal  Executive Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date:  November 14, 2006                By:  /s/ Tom Yu Liu
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Tom Yu Liu
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,997
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,787
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,244)
<INVENTORY>                                    257,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               405,274
<PP&E>                                         135,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                (28,329)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 820,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          174,599
<BONDS>                                        268,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       411,524
<OTHER-SE>                                    (79,606)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   820,673
<SALES>                                        735,210
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               739,783
<CGS>                                          546,107
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  661,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,835)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,859
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 59,429
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,268
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,161
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alan J. Bibeau, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 428]

Carpinello, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of *1226Clinton County (Ryan, J.), rendered October 1, 2004, which revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty in February 2004 to one count of felony driving while intoxicated. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he was sentenced to five years’ probation. In August 2004, he was charged with violating numerous conditions of his probation by, among other things, consuming alcohol and marihuana, and attempting to contact his estranged wife in violation of an order of protection. Following a hearing at which various witnesses testified, County Court concluded that defendant had, in fact, violated five of the conditions of his probation and, as a result, sentenced him to 1 to 3 years in prison. Defendant now appeals.

Defendant’s sole contention is that the County Court judge who presided over his violation hearing was biased and, therefore, should have recused himself. Initially, we note that none of the statutory grounds mandating recusal, which are set forth in Judiciary Law § 14, are applicable here. In such case, the “ ‘trial judge is the sole arbiter of recusal and his or her decision in that regard will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion’ ” *(People v Saunders,*301 AD2d 869, 871 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 542 [2003], quoting *Matter of Stampfler v Snow,*290 AD2d 595, 596 [2002]; *see People v Crane,*294 AD2d 867 [2002], *lv denied*98 NY2d 767 [2002]). Defendant’s claim of bias is premised upon County Court’s denial of his request to reduce bail, its purported displeasure with defendant’s outpatient substance abuse treatment, a claimed reference to the imposition of a prison term if a violation were found and its comments regarding defendant’s relapse. Upon reviewing the record, we find that none of these claimed improprieties is indicative of bias. The $15,000 bail amount, the same as the amount originally established at the initial arraignment, was reasonable under the circumstances. The record does not reveal that County Court expressed its dissatisfaction with defendant’s substance abuse treatment plan nor made inappropriate remarks concerning his relapse. Inasmuch as a probation violation would normally result in probation revocation and the imposition of a term of imprisonment, County Court’s alleged reference to this fact was not prejudicial. Accordingly, we conclude that County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s request for recusal and the judgment must be affirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5259 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5259

     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1/3-Phenyl-7-(4-
           propoxyphenyl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b]difuran-2,6-dione.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 1/3-Phenyl-7-(4-
           propoxyphenyl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b]difuran-2,6-dione.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1/3-PHENYL-7-(4-PROPOXYPHENYL)BENZO[1,2-B:4,5-B]DIFURAN-2,6-
              DIONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.97 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 1/3-Phenyl-7-(4-
propoxyphenyl)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b]difuran-2,6-dione) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Lafoy BALL, Jr.

No. 590P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 1, 2005.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Lafoy Ball, Jr.

Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 24th day of October 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of December 2005."
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002



I, Benjamin Cohen, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Capital
Beverage Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15) for the registrant and I have:



a) designed such internal
controls to ensure that material information relating to the registrant and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”)
is made known to me by others within the Company, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrant’s internal controls as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation
Date”); and



c) presented in this
annual report my conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and  procedures based on my
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to
the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:



a) all significant deficiencies (if any)
in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal
controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and



6. I have indicated in this annual report
whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date  of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|Date: April 13, 2018 | By: | /s/ Benjamin Cohen                   
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------
|                     |     | Benjamin Cohen                       
|                     |     | President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5395 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5395

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``William `Bill' 
                      Clay Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WILLIAM ``BILL'' CLAY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``William `Bill' Clay Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``William 
`Bill' Clay Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 9, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5395

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 11001 Dunklin Drive in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``William `Bill' 
                      Clay Post Office Building''.
```