alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
AUDITIED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COSTILLA ENERGY INC. FOR THE YEAR END DECEMBER 
31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          12,618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,038
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,409
<PP&E>                                         147,379
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,435)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,089
<BONDS>                                        100,262
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,047
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,790
<SALES>                                         53,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,026
<CGS>                                           21,774
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,324
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,430
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,281
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,753
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,218
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                535
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,975)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,440)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.69)
        

</TABLE>
Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States | 63

Section 6: Acknowledgments 

The authors appreciate the review and constructive comments from the following external reviewers*: Dr. 

Mark Merrifield (Scripps Institution of Oceanography), Dr. Gary Mitchum (University of South Florida), Dr. 

Claudia Tebaldi (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), Dr. Thomas Wahl (University of Central Florida), 

Dr. Steve Nerem (University of Colorado), Abby Sullivan (Philadelphia Water Department), and David Behar 

(San Francisco Public Utilities Commission).

We also thank the following agencies and/or their personnel for the reviews provided: Dr. Davina Passeri (U.S. Geological Survey [USGS]), Dr. Erika Lentz (USGS), Dr. Rebecca Beavers (National Park Service), Heidi Stiller (NOAA), Jamie Carter (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA]), 

Lisa Auermuller (Rutgers University), Dr. Renee Collini (Mississippi State University), Laura Engeman (Scripps 

Institution of Oceanography), Dr. Ian Miller, (University of Washington), Katy Hintzen (University of Hawaiʻi), 

Jill Gambill (University of Georgia), Carey Schafer (EcoAdapt), and Rachel Johnson (NOAA). We would like to 

thank Sean Vitousek (model output) and Amy Foxgrover (figure illustration) of the USGS for Wave Call-out 

box support.

The contributions of Robert Kopp and Greg Garner were supported by the National Science Foundation 

(ICER-1663807, ICER-2103754) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (award 80NSSC20K1724 and JPL task 105393.509496.02.08.13.31). Contributions of John Marra, William Sweet, Jayantha 

Obeysekera, and Ayesha Genz were supported by the U.S. Department of Defense Strategic Environmental 

Research and Development Program through work carried out under Project RC-2644. The contributions of 

Benjamin Hamlington, Thomas Frederikse, Eric Larour, and David Bekaert were carried out in part at the Jet 

Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration (80NM0018D0004). The contributions of Patrick Barnard were supported by the USGS 

Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program. The authors thank NOAA’s Ashely Miller for her geographic information support.

Production Team

Brooke C. Stewart,

Science Editor, NC State University

Andrea L. McCarrick, 

Technical Editor, NC State University

Jessicca Allen, 

Lead Graphic Designer, NC State University

S. Elizabeth Love-Brotak,

Graphic Designer, NOAA

Deborah Misch,

Lead Graphic Designer, Innovative Consulting & Management Services, LLC

Sara W. Veasey, 

Visual Communications Team Lead, NOAA

Jacquelyn Crossman, 

Librarian, ZAI-MPF

*The identification of the external reviewers does not imply that they agreed with all of the content of this report.
# C_2016472EN.01000101.xml

| 16.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 472/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 472/1

---

DECISION

(2016/C 472/01)

THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT,

| — | HAVING REGARD TO Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 (2) and most recently by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (3), in particular Article 30 of those Staff Regulations, |
| --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 (1), as amended by Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 723/2004 (2) and most recently by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 amending the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (3), in particular Article 30 of those Staff Regulations,

1

2

3

| — | HAVING REGARD TO the Bureau decision of 13 January 2014 on the delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE), |
| --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO the Bureau decision of 13 January 2014 on the delegation of the powers of the appointing authority and of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment (AECE),

| — | HAVING REGARD TO the expiry date of 31 December 2016 set for the following European Parliament reserve lists:






  — | AD/1/12, PE/106/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/165/S, |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO the expiry date of 31 December 2016 set for the following European Parliament reserve lists:

—

AD/1/12, PE/106/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/165/S,

| — | HAVING REGARD TO the opinion of the Joint Committee issued at its meeting of 5 October 2016, |
| --- | --- |

—

HAVING REGARD TO the opinion of the Joint Committee issued at its meeting of 5 October 2016,

HAS DECIDED:

Article 1

The period of validity of the following reserve lists:

| | AD/1/12, PE/165/S, AST/4/11, |
| --- | --- |

AD/1/12, PE/165/S, AST/4/11,

shall be extended until 31 December 2017.

Article 2

The period of validity of the following reserve lists:

| | PE/106/S, PE/124/S, AST/5/11, |
| --- | --- |

PE/106/S, PE/124/S, AST/5/11,

shall not be extended.

Luxembourg, 18 November 2016.

Klaus WELLE

Secretary-General

---

(1)  OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 124, 27.4.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 15.

3

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4906 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pyromellitic dianhydride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. LAMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pyromellitic 

dianhydride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PYROMELLITIC DIANHYDRIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.05.14 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Kwame ANANE v. WAKE COUNTY, North Carolina.

No. 404P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 3, 2005.

Kwame Anane, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Plaintiff on the 2nd day of August 2005 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Wake County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of August 2005."
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of AT&S Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard G. Honan,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350,
      that:





·


The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





·


The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
       November 9, 2006








//s//
      Richard G. Honan


------------------------


Richard
      G. Honan,


Chief
      Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF****THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofInfraSource Services, Inc. (the “Company”) for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Form  10-Q”), David R. Helwig, as ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Terence R. Montgomery, asChief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tothe best of his knowledge: The Form 10-Q fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.     /s/ DAVID R. HELWIG           David R. Helwig *Chief Executive Officer*Date: May 6, 2005     /s/ TERENCE R. MONTGOMERY           Terence R. Montgomery *Chief Financial Officer*Date: May 6, 2005This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
33
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Peter Weigand, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) of Commerce EnergyGroup, Inc.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly reportis being prepared;  c)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.       Date: June 14, 2005 By: /s/ PETER WEIGAND         PETER WEIGAND     President     (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Erin E. West, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProCentury Corporation (“ProCentury”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for ProCentury and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to ProCentury,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of ProCentury’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in ProCentury’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during ProCentury’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ProCentury’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ProCentury’s auditors and theaudit committee of ProCentury’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectProCentury’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in ProCentury’s internal control over financial reporting.November 9, 2007
Patrick Todd BAYLIFF v. STATE of North Carolina, Honorable J.B. Allen, Jr.

No. 81P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Patrick Todd Bayliff, Pro Se.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of February 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2843
WILLIAM SANFORD GADD; EDDIE BRADFORD LEE, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and CANAAN PROJECT; CORNERSTONE; D&J TRUST; FLAXTRUST; GEMINI TRUST; GLOBAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION; H.F.S. TRUST; HIGHLANDER TRUST; J.E.L. TRUST; RAINBOW ENT TRUST; ROAD TO FREEDOM; SILVER WILL TRUST; TREE TRUST; TRS TRUST, Plaintiffs, versus ROBERT RUBIN, Secretary of the Treasury; LISA GRIGG; MICHAEL C. STENGER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-639-MU) Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 19, 1999 Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.2 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Sanford Gadd, Eddie Bradford Lee, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:William Sanford Gadd and Eddie Bradford Lee appeal the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motion to dismisstheir complaint for failure to state a claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. See Gadd v. Rubin , No. CA-97-639-MU (W.D.N.C. Dec. 9, 1998). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 499 

For the relief of Fouad Yousef Hakim Mansour and Saheir Gamil Shaker 

Mansour. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. HUNTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Fouad Yousef Hakim Mansour and Saheir 

Gamil Shaker Mansour. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR FOUAD 

4 YOUSEF HAKIM MANSOUR AND SAHEIR 

5 GAMIL SHAKER MANSOUR. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

8 Act, Fouad Yousef Hakim Mansour and Saheir Gamil 

9 Shaker Mansour shall each be eligible for issuance of an 

10 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 499 IH

1 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil2 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

3 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

4 lawful permanent resident. 

5 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Fouad Yousef 

6 Hakim Mansour and Saheir Gamil Shaker Mansour enters 

7 the United States before the filing deadline specified in 

8 subsection (c), he or she shall be considered to have en9 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

10 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

11 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

12 enactment of this Act. 

13 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

14 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap15 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica16 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

17 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

18 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

19 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res20 idence to Fouad Yousef Hakim Mansour and Saheir Gamil 

21 Shaker Mansour, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 

22 proper officer to reduce by 2, during the current or next 

23 following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas 

24 that are made available to natives of the country of the 

25 aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
3 

•HR 499 IH

1 Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immi2 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun3 try of the aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of such Act. 

4 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

5 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

6 parents, brothers, and sisters of Fouad Yousef Hakim 

7 Mansour and Saheir Gamil Shaker Mansour shall not, by 

8 virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi9 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wind Works Power Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009,   as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  3.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.    Date:  May 14, 2009                      By: /s/ Lucie Letellier ------------------------------ Lucie Letellier , CFO