alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
        THE
        SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. (the
        "company") on Form 10-QSBA for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Donald C.
        Vanderbrook, Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to
        18
        U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the consolidated financial condition of the company as
                  of the
                  dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the company
                  for
                  the periods presented.
 
 May
                  19, 2008
              /s/
                  Donald C. VanderbrookDonald
                  C. Vanderbrook,Chief
                  Executive Officer
  This
        certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of BIO-keyInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endedDecember 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas J. Colatosti, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| BIO-KEY  INTERNATIONAL, INC. |                          |
|-----------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                              |                          |
| By:                               | /s/ THOMAS  J. COLATOSTI |   |
|                              | Thomas J.  Colatosti          |   |
|                              | Chief Financial  Officer      |   |
|                              |                          |
| Date:  March 11, 2009        |                          |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 November 5, 2008/s/ Frederic H. Moll, M.D.Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6183

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MICHAEL RAY SHIFFLETT, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-33) Submitted: May 11, 2000 Decided: May 18, 2000 Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Ray Shifflett, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Martin Sorenson, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennie M. Waering, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael Ray Shifflett appeals the district court’s order denying his “motion for reconsideration of motion for subpoena of stenotype notes.” We have reviewed the record and the districtcourt’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Shifflett , No. CR-91-33 (W.D. Va. Dec. 22, 1999). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
HomeEducationTides and Water Levels

# Tides and Water Levels

## Changing Angles and Changing Tides

As we’ve just seen, the Earth's two tidal bulges are aligned with the  positions of the moon and the sun. Over time, the positions of these  celestial bodies change relative to the Earth’s equator. The changes in  their relative positions have a direct effect on daily tidal heights  and tidal current intensity.

As the moon revolves around the Earth, its angle increases and  decreases in relation to the equator. This is known as its declination.  The two tidal bulges track the changes in lunar declination, also  increasing or decreasing their angles to the equator. Similarly, the  sun’s relative position to the equator changes over the course of a  year as the Earth rotates around it. The sun’s declination affects the  seasons as well as the tides. During the vernal and autumnal  equinoxes—March 21 and September 23, respectively—the sun is at its  minimum declination because it is positioned directly above the  equator. On June 21 and December 22—the summer and winter solstices,  respectively—the sun is at its maximum declination, i.e., its largest  angle to the equator (Sumich, J.L., 1996).

*The Earth’s tidal bulges track, or follow, the position of the moon, and to a lesser extent, the sun. As the angles of these two celestial bodies in relation to the Earth increase and decrease, so do the tidal bulges. Here we observe the moon's changing declination to the equator and the effect that this has on the positions of the Earth’s tidal bulges.*

### Tides and Water Levels

              - Welcome
              - What are Tides?
              - What Causes Tides?
              - Gravity, Inertia, and Bulges
              - Changing Angles and Tides
              - The Frequency of Tides
              - Tidal Variations
              - Types and Causes of Tidal Cycles
              - What Else Affects Tides?
              - Monitoring the Tides
              - Old System
              - New System
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources 
              - Subject Review

----

National Science Teaching Association (NSTA)

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
EXHIBIT 32.2

<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2


                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Horizon Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Don
Paterson, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                         By  /s/ Don Paterson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Don Paterson
                                            Principal Accounting Officer

   Date:  August 15, 2005


                                       26
STATE v. MARTIN.

No. COA04-1161.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 7, 2005.

Certification Date June 27, 2005.

Appeal from Chatham (97CRS5545)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and Subsidiaries

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-13075 and 333-103145) of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reports dated December 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2005, the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005, which reports appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and Subsidiaries for the year ended September 30, 2005.

 

| /s/ KPMG LLP                      |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| Detroit, MichiganDecember 9, 2005 |   |   |   |

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5209 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5209

 To suspend temporarily the duty on Pressure Hose with red jacket, 42 
    millimeters outside diameter  x  32 millimeters inside diameter.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on Pressure Hose with red jacket, 42 
    millimeters outside diameter  x  32 millimeters inside diameter.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRESSURE HOSE WITH RED JACKET, 42 MILLIMETERS OUTSIDE 
              DIAMETER  x  32 MILLIMETERS INSIDE DIAMETER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00        Pressure Hose      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          with red jacket,                                                   31/2011.......
                          42 millimeters
                          outside diameter
                          x  32 millimeters
                          inside diameter
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3917.32.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
VICKERS v. PRIDGEN.

S04A1299.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

October 25, 2004.

Judgment affirmed without opinion.
STATE v. POWELL

No. COA04-127

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed February 15, 2005

Certification Date March 7, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

In accordance with Title 41 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Section 102-3.65(a), notice is hereby given that the Charter for the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials and Translational Research Advisory Committee, was renewed for an additional two-year period on April 14, 2022.

It is determined that the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials and Translational Research Advisory Committee, is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the National Cancer Institute by law, and that these duties can best be performed through the advice and counsel of this group.

                    Inquiries may be directed to Claire Harris, Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Mail code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or                     *harriscl@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: June 17, 2022.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2022-13418 Filed 6-22-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
FOWLER v. FOOD LION, INC.

No. COA04-725.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 7, 2005.

Certification Date June 27, 2005.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #214669)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
RICHARDSON v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC INST.

No. 642A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 12, 2005.

Laura E. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for Dept. of Public Instruction.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of March 2005 by Plaintiff Requesting Rationale and Motion Requesting Ruling Justices:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of April 2005."
STATE v. CUTLER.

No. COA05-22.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Wake (03CRS74038)

Case reported without published opinion No error.
STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. COA04-135

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed January 18, 2005

Certification Date February 7, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5136 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States to permit 

foreign jewelry manufacturers who purchase precious metals produced 

in the United States for use in the manufacture of jewelry abroad 

to pay import duties on the value of the imported jewelry articles less 

the value of all United States origin precious metals incorporated in 

the article. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2008 

Mr. TIBERI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United 

States to permit foreign jewelry manufacturers who purchase precious metals produced in the United States 

for use in the manufacture of jewelry abroad to pay 

import duties on the value of the imported jewelry articles less the value of all United States origin precious 

metals incorporated in the article. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5136 IH

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ARTICLES OF JEWELRY AND PARTS 

2 THEREOF, OF PRECIOUS METALS PRODUCED 

3 IN THE UNITED STATES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 98 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9802.00.70 Articles of jewelry and parts thereof, of precious metal (as defined in 

note 4(a) to Chapter 71), if fabricated in whole or in part with precious metal that is a product of the 

United States .................................. A duty upon 

the value of the 

imported article, less the 

cost or value of 

such products 

of the United 

States (see 

U.S. note 4 of 

this subchapter) 

As provided for 

the imported 

article 

A duty upon 

the full value 

of the imported 

article, less the 

cost or value of 

such products 

of the United 

States (see 

U.S. note 4 of 

this subchapter) .......... ’’. 

8 (b) U.S. NOTE 4.—U.S. Note 4 to subchapter II of 

9 chapter 98 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

10 United States is amended— 

11 (1) by amending the heading to read as follows: 

12 ‘‘4. ARTICLES ASSEMBLED ABROAD WITH COMPO13 NENTS PRODUCED IN THE UNITED STATES OR FAB14 RICATED ABROAD WITH PRECIOUS METALS PRODUCED

15 IN THE UNITED STATES.—’’; 

16 (2) in the matter preceding paragraph (a), by 

17 striking ‘‘headings 9802.00.80 and 9802.00.90’’ and 

18 inserting ‘‘headings 9802.00.70 through 

19 9802.00.90’’; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5136 IH

1 (3) in paragraph (a), by inserting ‘‘or fab2 ricated’’ after ‘‘assembled’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

4 this section apply to articles entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND


CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Desert Capital REIT, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







August
      13, 2009
            /s/ Todd B.
      ParriottTodd
      B. Parriott,Chief
      Executive Officer, President, Chief Investment Officer and Chairman of the
      BoardAugust
      13, 2009
            /s/ Stacy M.
      RiffeStacy
      M. Riffe,Chief
      Financial Officer
NEW HAMPSHIRE 

ηϯς

Ψϯ͘ϭ^WEd/E

ηϭκ

ϯ͘ρйK&^dd'W

Ϭ͘ςй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

ΨϮ͕ϮςΘ

PER RESIDENT 

#32 

ΨϮ͘ΘKEdZd

ηρϬ

ς͕ϯϯϳEhDZK&

ηρϬ

ΨϬ͘ϯWZ^KEE>

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ ϭϮй

ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ ϭй ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ

ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ϭϭй

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐĂŶĚ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ϳςй

By Service 

Army 

19% 

Navy/Marines 

36% 

Air Force 

24% 

Other Defense 

21% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Reserve: 23% Active Duty: 17% 

Civilian: 17% 

National 

Guard: 43% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

50% 

Navy/Marines 

22% 

Air Force 

25% 

Other Defense 

3% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

^LJƐƚĞŵƐ Ψϭ͘ς

,ĂƌƌŝƐŽƌƉ͘ ΨϭΘϭ͘κD

>ϯdĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐ Ψϭϯκ͘ςD

^ŝŐ^ĂƵĞƌ/ŶĐ͘ ΨΘε͘εD

ZĞĚZŝǀĞƌŽŵƉƵƚĞƌŽŵƉĂŶLJ ΨϳΘ͘ΘD

^ĂĨƌĂŶKƉƟĐƐϭ ΨςΘ͘εD

ůďŝƚ^LJƐƚĞŵƐ Ψςϳ͘ϭD

ZĂLJƚŚĞŽŶ Ψρκ͘κD

ƌĞĂƌĞ Ψϯε͘ϳD

tŝůĐŽdž/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĞƐŽƌƉ͘ ΨϯϮ͘ρD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ΨϮ͘Θ

ΨϮ͘Ϯ

Ψϭ͘ϳ Ψϭ͘ς Ψϭ͘κ

&zϭϮ &zϭϯ

Ψϭ͘Ϯ Ψϭ͘ϭ Ψϭ͘Ϭ

&zϭκ &zϭρ &zϭς &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

ΨϮρκ͘ρD/>>/KE ς͕ϯϯϳ

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

ŽƵŶƚLJ ĐƟǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

ZŽĐŬŝŶŐŚĂŵ ϯϮε κϯρ ϭ͕ϭϭΘ

DĞƌƌŝŵĂĐŬ E ϮϬϭ ςϯρ

,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽƵŐŚ ςϬ ϭΘϮ ρςΘ

'ƌĂŌŽŶ E Ϯκϭ Ϯκκ

^ƚƌĂīŽƌĚ ϭϭ ϭς ϭκϭ

ŚĞƐŚŝƌĞ E E Ϭ

ĞůŬŶĂƉ Ϭ E Ϭ

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

ϭ͕ϭϯϯ ϯ͕Ϭϭρ

E E

E E

Ϭ E

Ϯεκ κςϮ

ρϭ E

Ϭ E

76 KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
NEW HAMPSHIRE FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

ŽŽƐ

'ƌĂĨƚŽŶ

ĂƌƌŽůů

ĞůŬŶĂƉ

^ƵůůŝǀĂŶ DĞƌƌŝŵĂĐŬ

^ƚƌĂĨĨŽƌĚ

ZŽĐŬŝŶŐŚĂŵ

,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽƵŐŚ

ŚĞƐŚŝƌĞ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (<сƚŚŽƵƐĂŶĚƐ͕DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽƵŐŚ

ZŽĐŬŝŶŐŚĂŵ

'ƌĂŌŽŶ

^ƵůůŝǀĂŶ

ĞůŬŶĂƉ

^ƚƌĂīŽƌĚ

ŚĞƐŚŝƌĞ

DĞƌƌŝŵĂĐŬ

ŽŽƐ

ĂƌƌŽůů

;<сƚŚŽƵƐĂŶĚƐ͕DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ΨϮ͘Ϭ

Ψςϭϭ͘ϳD

ΨϭϬΘ͘ΘD

ΨΘϬ͘ΘD

Ψϭε͘ςD

Ψϭε͘ρD

Ψϭϳ͘εD

Ψρ͘ϳD

Ψϳςϭ͘ϭ<

Ψϭκρ͘ϯ<

ZŽĐŬŝŶŐŚĂŵ

DĞƌƌŝŵĂĐŬ

,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽƵŐŚ

'ƌĂŌŽŶ

^ƚƌĂīŽƌĚ

ŚĞƐŚŝƌĞ

ĞůŬŶĂƉ

ΨϭϬρ͘κD

Ψϯε͘κD

Ψϯϭ͘ϬD

ΨϮϭ͘ρD

ΨΘ͘ϭD

Ψϭ͘ςD

ΨϯϮε͘κ<

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

'ƌĂĨƚŽŶ

ĞůŬŶĂƉ

DĞƌƌŝŵĂĐŬ

^ƚƌĂĨĨŽƌĚ

,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽƵŐŚ

ŚĞƐŚŝƌĞ ZŽĐŬŝŶŐŚĂŵ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε ϳϳ