alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016276EN.01000401.xml

| 13.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 276/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 276/4

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1807

of 30 September 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Poulet du Périgord (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Poulet du Périgord’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Poulet du Périgord’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Poulet du Périgord’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Poulet du Périgord’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Poulet du Périgord’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 195, 2.6.2016, p. 10.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**INFRASOURCE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, David R. Helwig, certify that:

 

1.    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InfraSource Services, Inc.;

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of director (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: June 11, 2004

 
| /s/ David R. Helwig                   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| David R. Helwig                       |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

----
HomeOcean Facts

# Do the Great Lakes have tides? 

## Water levels in the Great Lakes change primarily because of meteorological effects.

View of the Holland, Michigan water level and meteorological station, located at the entrance to Macatawa Bay. Historic water level data has been collected in this vicinity since 1894. 

True tides—changes in water level caused by the  gravitational forces of the sun and moon—do occur in a semi-diurnal (twice  daily) pattern on the Great Lakes. Studies indicate that the Great Lakes spring  tide, the largest tides caused by the combined forces of the sun and moon, is  less than five centimeters in height. These minor variations are  masked by the greater fluctuations in lake levels produced by wind and  barometric pressure changes.  

Consequently, the Great Lakes are considered to be non-tidal.

Water levels in the Great Lakes have long-term, annual, and  short-term variations. Long-term variations depend on precipitation and water  storage over many years. Annual variations occur with the changing seasons.  There is an annual high in the late spring and low in the winter. These changes  occur at a rate that can be measured in feet per month.

    Wind  and weather conditions on the Great Lakes may create a seiche, an oscillating  wave which can be several feet high. In  many of the Great Lakes, the time period between the “high” and “low” of a  seiche may be between four and seven hours. As this is  very similar to the six-hour time period of the tides on the ocean, it is  frequently mistaken for a tide. 

###### **Search** Our Facts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services
          - Great Lakes Water Level Data
          - Tide and Current Frequently Asked Questions
          - Tides Tutorial
          - Tides Podcast (audio)

**Last updated:**   01/20/23**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
STATE v. TEASTER

COA04-1476

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Avery (03CRS753).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the quarterly report of NationsRent Companies, Inc.
("NationsRent") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas J. Putman, the Chief Executive Officer of NationsRent, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)      The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)      The information contained in such the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of NationsRent.

Date: March 30, 2005

| | /s/ Thomas J. Putman
      Thomas J. Putman
      Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stratum Holdings, Inc. (the “registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, D. Hughes Watler, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of this Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.








/s/D. Hughes Watler, Jr.


D. Hughes Watler, Jr.


Chief Financial Officer


August 11, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5278 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5278

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Option and Revolver 
                              herbicides.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

 Mrs. Capito introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Option and Revolver 
                              herbicides.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPTION AND REVOLVER HERBICIDES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.37 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Option and Revolver 
herbicides) is amended by striking the date in the effective period 
column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS for the Fifth Circuit

_____________________________________

No. 98-50082 Summary Calendar

_____________________________________

TOYA TAYLOR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

SERGIOS SALON & SPA,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(SA-97-CV-334)

______________________________________________________ July 24, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Toya Taylor challenges the district court's summary

judgment order dismissing her Title VII action seeking damages for

discriminatory discharge as manager of Appelle e's salon. Taylor

all eges that she was terminated at least in part because she is

black.

The Appellee gave a number of reasons for discharging Ms.2

Taylor. In general, the employer asserted that she received

s everal complaints from customers and other employees that Ms.

Taylor's work was deficient. More particularly, the employer

alleged that Ms. Taylor: (l) had left the salon for long periods of

time without permission; (2) had shorta ges in the cash register;

(3) failed to comply with the dress code; (4) had not accounted for

petty cash withdrawals; (5) had other employees close the s alon;

and (6) had her hair done at other salons on company time.

In attempting to show that the employer's stated reasons for

her discharge were pretextual, Ms. Taylor's primary argument is

that no employee from her protected class has been fired for the

reasons stated by the employer. However, Ms. Taylor provided no

competent summary judgment evidence of other employees not in her

protected class who had committed similar infractions. Ms. Taylor

also admitt ed that before her termination the employer counseled

her about those violations. She does not dispute the employer's

summary judgment evidence that she was only terminated after

subsequent violations occurred.

Assuming without deciding that Ms. Taylor stated a prima facie

case, we agree with the district court that the employer stated

adequate, non-discriminatory grounds for discharging Ms. Taylor and

Ms. Taylor's summary judgment evidence was insufficient to show

that those reasons were pretextual.

For the above reasons, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
                                                                                

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements,
(Form S-8, No. 333-33051) pertaining to Primex Technologies, Inc. Retirement
Investment Management Experience Plan; (Form S-8, No. 333-18297) pertaining to
Primex Technologies, Inc. Stock Plan for Non-employees Directors; (Form S-8, No.
333-57857) pertaining to 1996 Long Term Incentive Plan of Primex Technologies,
Inc., of our report dated February 1, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Primex Technologies, Inc. included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

                                              /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Tampa, Florida
March 16, 1999
STATE v. DAVIS

No. COA04-1672

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Richmond (03CRS54170).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error in the trial. Remanded for corrections.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5078 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5078

        To extend the suspension of duty on Desmodur BL XP 2468.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2008

Mr. Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the suspension of duty on Desmodur BL XP 2468.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESMODUR BL XP 2468.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.12 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Copolymer of methyl ethyl 
ketoxime and toluenediisocyanate) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' 
and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# ***Exhibit 32.1***

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Accessory HoldingsCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Terence C. Seikel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|    /s/ TERENCE C. SEIKEL |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Terence C. Seikel                       |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer   |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)           |   |
| November 12, 2004                       |   |

 

1

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4796 

To extend the suspension of duty on formulations of Thiamethoxam, 

Difenoconazole, Fludioxonil, and Mefenoxam. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on formulations of 

Thiamethoxam, Difenoconazole, Fludioxonil, and Mefenoxam. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FORMULATIONS OF THIAMETHOXAM, DIFENO4 CONAZOLE, FLUDIOXONIL, AND MEFENOXAM. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.31 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 formulations of Thiamethoxam, Difenoconazole, Fludiox8 onil, and Mefenoxam) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

9 2009’’ and by inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4796 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely  for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned  certifies,  in  his  capacity  as  the  Chief  Financial Officer of
Integral  Technologies,  Inc.,  that, to his knowledge, the annual report of the
company  on  Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934  and  that  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material  respects, the company's financial condition and results of operations.


September  29,  2006


/s/  William  A.  Ince
-------------------------------------------------------
William  A.  Ince,  Chief  Financial  Officer
118 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

WYOMING 

#51

$0.5 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#43

1.1% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$822

PER RESIDENT 

#51

$0.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#49

7,345 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#49

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and 

Equipment: 11%

Service: 57%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

1%

Air Force

Other Defense

8%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 3%

National 

Guard: 39%

Civilian: 15%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

27%

Navy/Marines

1%

Air Force

Other Defense

1%

72%

Construction: 31%

Research and

Development: 1%

39%

52%

Active Duty: 43%

Top Defense Contractors 

M1 Support Services

Fluor Corp.

Broncho Co.

Green Contracting Co., Inc.

Native American Services Corp.

American Contracting

IT Consulting Partners LLC

Test Range Systems LLC

Umyuaq Construction

High West Energy, Inc.

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.2 $0.2

$0.1 $0.1 $0.1 $0.1

FY18 FY19

$0.1 $0.1

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY20 FY21

$350.9 MILLION 7,345

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Laramie 3,103 1,013 1,839

Platte 58 75 191 

Natrona ND ND 76

Albany 11 ND 118 

Uinta 0 ND 87 

Fremont 0 ND 81 

Campbell 0 ND 79 

Sheridan 0 ND 63

Goshen 0 0 74 

Lincoln 0 ND 61

(M = millions)

$24.9 M

$11.4 M

$8.1 M

$7.9 M

$6.1 M

$4.8 M

$4.7 M

$4.6 M

$4.3 M

$2.4 M

Reserve

114 

0 

60

0 

0 

0 

0 

12 

0 

0 

Total

6,069

324 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

74 

ND 
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 WYOMING

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Campbell

Sheridan

Fremont Natrona

Lincoln Goshen

Platte

Albany

Uinta

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Park

Sheridan

Teton

Fremont Natrona

Sublette

Platte

Albany

Sweetwater

Laramie

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Laramie

Sheridan

Sublette

Natrona

Platte

Albany

Teton

Park

Sweetwater

Fremont

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$101.3 M

$7.1 M

$2.7 M

$2.5 M

$2.3 M

$818.2 K

$812.0 K

$773.4 K

$183.6 K

$125.4 K

Laramie

Platte

Albany

Natrona

Sheridan

Fremont

Uinta

Campbell

Lincoln

Goshen

$318.8 M

$12.2 M

$4.9 M

$1.9 M

$1.6 M

$1.5 M

$1.2 M

$1.1 M

$967.9 K

Laramie

$3.4 M

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 11

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

9