alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5173 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5173

   To temporarily delay application of proposed changes to Medicaid 
    payment rules for case management and targeted case management 
                               services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

   Mr. Ellison (for himself, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Duncan, Ms. McCollum of 
    Minnesota, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Walz of Minnesota, Mr. Peterson of 
  Minnesota, Mr. Cummings, and Mr. Oberstar) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To temporarily delay application of proposed changes to Medicaid 
    payment rules for case management and targeted case management 
                               services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MORATORIUM ON IMPLEMENTATION OF CHANGES TO CASE MANAGEMENT 
              AND TARGETED CASE MANAGEMENT PAYMENT REQUIREMENTS UNDER 
              MEDICAID.

    (a) Delayed Implementation of December 4, 2007, Interim Final 
Rule.--The interim final rule published on December 4, 2007, at pages 
68,077 through 68,093 of volume 72 of the Federal Register (relating to 
parts 431, 440, and 441 of the Code of Federal Regulations) shall not 
take effect before April 1, 2009.
    (b) Continuation of 2007 Payment Policies and Practices.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of Health and 
Human Services shall not, prior to April 1, 2009, take any action 
(through promulgation of regulation, issuance of regulatory guidance, 
use of Federal payment audit procedures, or other administrative 
action, policy or practice, including a Medical Assistance Manual 
transmittal or issuance of a letter to State Medicaid directors) to 
restrict coverage or payment under title XIX of the Social Security Act 
for case management and targeted case management services if such 
action is more restrictive than the administrative action, policy, or 
practice that applies to coverage of, or payment for, such services 
under title XIX of the Social Security Act on December 3, 2007. Any 
such action taken by the Secretary of Health and Human Services during 
the period that begins on December 4, 2007, and ends on March 31, 2009, 
that is based in whole or in part on the interim final rule described 
in subsection (a) is null and void.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2023084DE.01003001.xml

| 23.3.2023 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 84/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2023

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 84/30

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2016/1237 der Kommission vom 18. Mai 2016 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1308/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates in Bezug auf die Durchführungsbestimmungen für die Regelung über Ein- und Ausfuhrlizenzen und zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1306/2013 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates in Bezug auf die Vorschriften über die Freigabe und den Verfall der für solche Lizenzen geleisteten Sicherheiten sowie zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EG) Nr. 2535/2001, (EG) Nr. 1342/2003, (EG) Nr. 2336/2003, (EG) Nr. 951/2006, (EG) Nr. 341/2007 und (EG) Nr. 382/2008 der Kommission und zur Aufhebung der Verordnungen (EG) Nr. 2390/98, (EG) Nr. 1345/2005, (EG) Nr. 376/2008 und (EG) Nr. 507/2008 der Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 206 vom 30. Juli 2016
  )

Seite 6, Artikel 5 Absatz 5 Unterabsatz 1:

Anstatt:

„Eine positive Toleranz findet keine Anwendung, wenn die in der Einfuhrlizenz angegebene Menge der Menge entspricht, die in einer Ausfuhrlizenz angegeben ist, was als Nachweis dafür anzusehen ist, dass das Erzeugnis die Voraussetzungen für eine Präferenzbehandlung aufgrund seiner besonderen Merkmale, der Vielfalt oder Qualität gemäß der entsprechenden internationalen Übereinkunft erfüllt.“

muss es heißen:

„Eine positive Toleranz findet keine Anwendung, wenn die in der Einfuhrlizenz angegebene Menge der Menge entspricht, die in einem Ausfuhrdokument angegeben ist, was als Nachweis dafür anzusehen ist, dass das Erzeugnis die Voraussetzungen für eine Präferenzbehandlung aufgrund seiner besonderen Merkmale, der Vielfalt oder Qualität gemäß der entsprechenden internationalen Übereinkunft erfüllt.“

---
MAINE 

#32 

Ψκ͘Ϭ^WEd/E

#7 

ρ͘ΘйK&^dd'W

Ϭ͘ϳй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

ΨϮ͕εςϭ

PER RESIDENT 

ηϯϬ

$3.2 B CONTRACT 

#43 

ϭϮ͕ϯϳςEhDZK&

ηϯς

ΨϬ͘ϳWZ^KEE>

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ

ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗κй ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ϭй

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ ϮϬй

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐ ĂŶĚ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ϳςй

By Service 

Army 

2% 

Navy/Marines 

Air Force 

0% 

Other Defense 

13% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Reserve:ρй Active Duty: 1% 

National 

Guard: 24% 

Civilian: 70% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

21% 

Navy/Marines 

62% 

Air Force 

11% 

Other Defense 

7% 

86% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

'ĞŶĞƌĂůLJŶĂŵŝĐƐ ΨϮ͘κ

DĂƌƟŶΖƐWŽŝŶƚ,ĞĂůƚŚĂƌĞ Ψϯρκ͘ϳD

DĞƚŚƵĞŶŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ ΨςϮ͘ϯD

ŝĂŶďƌŽŽŵƉĂŶŝĞƐ ΨρϮ͘ϳD

>͘ ^͘ůĂĐŬŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŽƌƐ/ŶĐ͘ ΨϮΘ͘ϳD

ŝƚLJŽĨĂŶŐŽƌ ΨϮκ͘ϬD

WƌĞĐŝƐŝŽŶWĂƌƚŶĞƌƐ>> ΨϮϭ͘ϯD

/ŶŶŽǀLJnjĞ/ŶĐ͘ Ψϭϳ͘ϳD

/ŶƚĞƌŵĂƚ Ψϭς͘κD

/ŶĞƌŐLJĂŶĚŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ΨϭϮ͘κD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψϯ͘Ϯ

ΨϮ͘ς

ΨϮ͘ϭ

&zϭϮ &zϭϯ

Ψϭ͘ϳ Ψϭ͘ϳ Ψϭ͘κ Ψϭ͘κ

&zϭκ &zϭρ &zϭς &zϭϳ

Ψϭ͘Ϯ

&zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Ψϳκε͘ϳD/>>/KE ϭϮ͕ϯϳς

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

ŽƵŶƚLJ ĐƟǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

ϭϳϯ E

ϭκκ E

E E

Ϭ E

ϭςϯ ςςϭ

Ϭ κϬΘ

εϭ E

Ϭ E

Ϭ εε

Ϭ E

zŽƌŬ E ς͕εςϮ ϳΘ

WĞŶŽďƐĐŽƚ E ϯεΘ ϭ͕ρϬρ

<ĞŶŶĞďĞĐ E ϭεϮ ςϭρ

ƌŽŽƐƚŽŽŬ E ςϬκ εΘ

ƵŵďĞƌůĂŶĚ Ϯϯ ϳς ϯεε

^ĂŐĂĚĂŚŽĐ Θς ϯϮϮ Ϭ

ŶĚƌŽƐĐŽŐŐŝŶ E ϮϬ Θρ

tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ E ϳϮ κϬ

KdžĨŽƌĚ Ϭ Ϭ εε

^ŽŵĞƌƐĞƚ E E ρρ

ρς KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR MAINE 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

ƌŽŽƐƚŽŽŬ

WĞŶŽďƐĐŽƚ

KdžĨŽƌĚ tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ

zŽƌŬ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

^ĂŐĂĚĂŚŽĐ

zŽƌŬ

ƵŵďĞƌůĂŶĚ

WĞŶŽďƐĐŽƚ

<ĞŶŶĞďĞĐ

tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ

KdžĨŽƌĚ

,ĂŶĐŽĐŬ

tĂůĚŽ

ƌŽŽƐƚŽŽŬ

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

$2.4 B 

ΨϯΘϮ͘ςD

ΨϯϳϬ͘ςD

Ψϯς͘ϳD

ΨϮϯ͘ρD

ΨϮϮ͘ΘD

Ψρ͘ϯD

Ψκ͘ϬD

ΨϮ͘ΘD

Ψϭ͘κD

zŽƌŬ

WĞŶŽďƐĐŽƚ

^ĂŐĂĚĂŚŽĐ

ƌŽŽƐƚŽŽŬ

<ĞŶŶĞďĞĐ

ƵŵďĞƌůĂŶĚ

tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ

ŶĚƌŽƐĐŽŐŐŝŶ

,ĂŶĐŽĐŬ

KdžĨŽƌĚ

Ψρκρ͘εD

Ψςε͘κD

Ψϯε͘ϬD

Ψϯϭ͘ϮD

Ψϯϭ͘ϬD

Ψϭε͘ϮD

Ψρ͘ρD

$3.2 M 

$2.2 M 

Ψϭ͘ρD

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

WĞŶŽďƐĐŽƚ

ŶĚƌŽƐĐŽŐŐŝŶ

,ĂŶĐŽĐŬ tĂůĚŽ

<ĞŶŶĞďĞĐ

^ĂŐĂĚĂŚŽĐ

ƵŵďĞƌůĂŶĚ

<ĞŶŶĞďĞĐ

^ĂŐĂĚĂŚŽĐ

ƵŵďĞƌůĂŶĚ

tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ

,ĂŶĐŽĐŬ

KdžĨŽƌĚ

zŽƌŬ

ƌŽŽƐƚŽŽŬ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε 57
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Integral Technologies, Inc. (the
“:Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
William A. Ince, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








September
29, 2008








/s/ William A. InceWilliam
      A. Ince, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 November 5, 2008/s/ Steven M. Van Dick

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.4

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul B. Carousso, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Paul B. Carousso         
|                        |  |  |  | Paul B. Carousso             
|                        |  |  |  | Vice President, Finance      
|                        |  |  |  | (principal financial officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Tereasa Lynn GIBSON.

No. 13P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Daniel Pollitt, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Tereasa Gibson.

Karen E. Long, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 10th day of January 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of January 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
42 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

ILLINOIS

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

By Type

Service: 22%

Construction: 5%

Research and 

Development: 7%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 66%

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions)

Northrop Grumman $864.0 M

Cardinal Health $482.9 M

BP Products North America $385.2 M

SupplyCore $278.5 M

Caterpillar $228.9 M

CDW Government $222.6 M

Alion Science and Technology $201.2 M

Navistar International $180.4 M

General Dynamics $149.9 M

Washington Group-Alberici, JV $123.7 M

$7.0

$6.1

$7.5

$4.1 $3.9 $3.5

$2.1

$5.5

27%

36%

11%

26%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.9 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

87,605

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

 Military

Lake 50,162 42,713 1,744

St. Clair 12,637 5,624 4,945

Rock Island 5,746 573 4,551

Cook 5,125 466 786

Sangamon 2,480 70 617

Peoria 2,385 57 438

Will 879 16 86

Champaign 695 37 310

DuPage 668 58 122

Macon 598 ND 55

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 26%

Active Duty: 58%

Civilian: 16%

46%

30%

22%

2%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 43

Sangamon

Rock Island

Champaign

Lake

DuPage

Cook 

Peoria 

St. Clair 

Winnebago

Rock Island

Madison 

Williamson

Lake

DuPage

Will 

Peoria 

St. Clair 

Pulaski 

St. Clair County

$669.8 M

Lake County

$578.8 M

Rock Island County 

$371.4 M

Cook County

$103.2 M

Sangamon County

$56.5 M

Peoria County

$40.7 M

Champaign County

$27.6 M

DuPage County

$18.8 M

Will County

$8.5 M

Macon County

$6.2 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions) (M=millions)

Lake County

$944.4 M

DuPage County

$620.4 M

St. Clair County

$606.6 M

Winnebago County

$453.3 M

Peoria County

$244.2 M

Rock Island County

$136.3 M

Pulaski County

$131.8 M

Williamson County

$123.7 M

Madison County

$110.8 M

Will County

$56.4 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

#27

$4.0 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#51

0.5% OF STATE GDP

1.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$312

PER RESIDENT

#28

$2.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#10

87,605 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#19

$1.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 ILLINOIS

Macon

Will 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5163 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5163

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical that is used for 
                     dyeing apparel home textiles.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

Mr. Brady of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical that is used for 
                     dyeing apparel home textiles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CHEMICAL THAT IS USED FOR DYEING APPAREL HOME TEXTILES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       3,10-Bis[(2-        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          aminopropyl)amino                                                  31/2011.......
                          ]-6,13-dichloro-
                          4,11-
                          triphenodioxazine
                          disulfonic acid
                          reaction products
                          with 2-amino-1,4-
                          benzenedisulfonic
                          acid, 2-[(4-
                          aminophenyl)sulfo
                          nyl]ethyl
                          hydrogen sulfate
                          and 2,4,6-
                          trifluoro-1,3,5-
                          trifluoro-1,3,5-
                          triazine, sodium
                          salts (CAS No.
                          191877-09-5)
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3204.16.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telanetix, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 11, 2010
/s/ J. Paul QuinnJ. Paul Quinn, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit
      23.1




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (No. 333-42926 )
      on Form
      S-8 of Big
      Dog
      Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries of our
      report dated March 3, 2006 relating to our audit of the consolidated financial
      statements, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Big
      Dog
      Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
      year ended December 31, 2005.











SINGER
      LEWAK GREENBAUM & GOLDSTEIN LLP





Los
      Angeles, California


March
      31,
      2005
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Marc L. Reisch           
|                        |  | Marc L. Reisch               
|                        |  | President and                
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                        |  | (principal executive officer)
48 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

IOWA 

#37 

$2.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#39 

1.1% OF STATE GDP

0.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$805

PER RESIDENT 

#31

$2.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#40

13,155 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#45

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 1% Development: 4%

Service: 15%

Supplies and

Equipment: 79%

By Service 

Army

20%

Navy/Marines

52%

Air Force

23%

Other Defense

5%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 2%

Reserve: 16% Civilian: 14%

National Guard: 68%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

79%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

18%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Raytheon Technologies

BAE Systems/Raytheon Technologies

Lockheed Martin

American Ordnance

Eaton Corp.

BAE Systems

Dexter Apache Holdings, Inc.

AI Convoy Holdco Limited

Alliant Techsystems Operations

Carver Pump Co.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.1 B

$310.0 M

$199.0 M

$120.0 M

$38.1 M

$35.5 M

$30.4 M

$26.1 M

$19.3 M

$18.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.5 $2.2

FY20

$2.1 $2.0

$1.6

$1.2 $1.2 $1.2

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY21

$444.3 MILLION 13,155

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Polk 102 787 3,281

Woodbury ND 284 1,140

Scott ND 189 451 

Linn ND 115 305 

Black Hawk 29 72 369

Johnson 44 32 418 

Boone 0 65 420 

Dallas ND 0 80 

Pottawattamie 0 17 236

Dubuque ND 32 148 

Reserve Total

757 4,927

62 ND 

301 ND 

354 ND 

87 557 

ND ND 

0 485 

254 ND 

66 319 

123 ND 
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 IOWA

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Linn

Des Moines

Scott

Polk

Johnson

Muscatine

Pottawattamie

Woodbury

Fremont

Union

(M = millions)

$1.7 B

$152.6 M

$103.1 M

$44.2 M

$37.5 M

$31.9 M

$15.5 M

$12.0 M

$11.0 M

$9.7 M 

Polk

Woodbury

Scott

Linn

Boone

Black Hawk

Johnson

Dubuque

Webster

Pottawattamie

$190.1 M

$52.1 M

$31.2 M

$25.2 M

$19.8 M

$17.2 M

$17.2 M

$9.1 M

$8.5 M

$7.2 M

Pottawattamie

Fremont

Union

Linn

Johnson Scott

Muscatine

Des Moines

Polk

Woodbury

Woodbury

Pottawattamie

Webster

Boone

Polk

Dubuque Black Hawk

Linn

Johnson Scott

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 49

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS