alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
BARRETT v. MORGAN CORPORATION/WAL-MART

No. COA04-1324.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #187444).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part, remanded in part.
EXHIBIT 31.1

INFORMATION ARCHITECTS CORPORATION

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Todd K. Morgan, the Chief Executive Officer of Information Architects Corporation, certifies that: 

1.

I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 of Information Architects Corporation; 

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.

I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: June 14, 2006

BY: /s/ Todd K. Morgan

——————————————

Todd K. Morgan

Chief Executive Officer
30 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

DELAWARE

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$312.2 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

9,795

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

 Military

Kent 6,616 4,043 1,123

New Castle 2,649 49 535

Sussex 521 ND 29

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 41%

Active Duty: 42%

Civilian: 17%

24%

3%

72%

1%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions) 

Johnson Controls Federal Systems-Versar, JV $39.0 M

American Registry of Pathology $16.6 M

Norfolk Dredging $14.1 M

Weeks Marine $13.4 M

Husky Energy $12.2 M

Bering Straits Technical Services $9.8 M

Caesar Rodney School District $8.6 M

Lockheed Martin $7.5 M

Cherokee Nation Construction Services $6.0 M

Tesla $5.4 M

32%

4%

38%

26%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Service: 60%

Construction: 13%

Research and 

Development: 4%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 23%

$0.3 $0.3 $0.3

$0.2

$0.3 $0.3

$0.2

$0.3

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 31

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

Kent County

$256.3 M

New Castle County

$52.2 M

Sussex County 

$3.6 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions) (M=millions)

Kent County

$140.6 M

 New Castle County

$63.9 M

Sussex County

$38.1 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

#45

$0.5 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#44

0.8% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$583

PER RESIDENT

#44

$0.2 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

#45

9,795 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL

#41

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 DELAWARE

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE / FINANCIAL OFFICER
MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I hereby  certify that,  to the best of my knowledge,  the annual report on Form
10-K/A No. 3 of Marine Exploration, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2009:

     (1)  complies  with  the  requirements  of  Section  13(a)  or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material  aspects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of
     Marine Exploration, Inc.

/s/ Mark Goldberg
-------------------------

A signed  original  of this  written  statement  required  by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 has been  provided to Marine  Exploration,  Inc. and
will be retained by Marine Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Alvin Vernon HAYWOOD.

No. 357P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Alvin V. Haywood, Pro Se.

Richard L. Harrison, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of July 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
STATE of North Carolina v. Gerald Wayne ADAMS.

No. 76P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Marilyn G. Ozer, Chapel Hill, for Gerald Wayne Adams.

Karen A. Blum, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 2nd day of February 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of February 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*419"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
# L_2016286EN.01000101.xml

| 21.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 286/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 286/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1864

of 10 October 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Chapon du Périgord (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Chapon du Périgord’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Chapon du Périgord’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Chapon du Périgord’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Chapon du Périgord’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Chapon du Périgord’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 October 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 205, 9.6.2016, p. 17.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
DURHAM COUNTY LAND OWNERS ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated association, Anderson Homes, Inc., Cimarron Capital, Inc., d/b/a Cimarron Homes, the Dress Company d/b/a the Dress Homes Company, M/I Homes of Raleigh, LLC, Olde South Homes, Inc., R.D. Construction, Inc., Randall H. Stewart, St. Lawrence Homes, Inc., Sun River Builders, Inc., Thomas Hugh Mullen, 3-D Builders, Inc., Vance Crabtree Builders, LLC, Westfield Homes of the Carolinas, LLC, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. COUNTY OF DURHAM COUNTY.

No. 343P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Henry C. Fordham, Jr., Apex, for Durham County Land Owners, et al.

Chuck Kitchen, County Attorney, for County of Durham.

Grayson Kelley, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 22nd day of June 2005 in this matter for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 prior to a determination by the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

*407"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."
LYNCH v. BROCK, SCOTT & INGERSOLL.

No. 321P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Thomas Brock, for Brock, Scott & Ingersoll.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of June 2005 by Plaintiff for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of June 2005."
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                 ASC EAST, INC.
                                  EPS EXHIBIT
                                  JULY 26,1998
                (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)

                                                                                 JULY 26,
                                                                                   1998
<S>                                                                                <C>  
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED CALCULATION
                                               
           Net income from continuing operations ............................        1,380

           Extraordinary loss, net of income tax benefit of $2,854  .........        4,464
                                                                             --------------

           Net loss .........................................................      (3,084)
                                                                             --------------

           Weighted average shares outstanding:
                   Common Stock .............................................      978,300
                                                                             --------------

           Loss per share (basic and fully diluted):

                   Net income from continuing operations ....................         1.41
                   Extraordinary loss .......................................       (4.56)
                   Net loss .................................................       (3.15)

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WALTER SCOTT FUNDERBURK, ) DOC #583380, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4125 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed June 21, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Charles Sniffen, Judge. Walter Scott Funderburk, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
STATE v. CHEEK

No. COA04-998

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed May 17, 2005

Certification Date June 6, 2005

Appeal from Randolph (01CRS56902).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. BOZEMAN

No. COA04-1063.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from Guilford (02CRS94476, 02CRS94477, 02CRS94495, 02CRS94496, 03CRS24529).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ammex Gold Mining Corp.  (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31,  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date:  February  11, 2008             By: /s/ Lucie Letellier

------------------------------

Lucie Letellier , CFO











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other  document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT31.4**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Paul B. Carousso,certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Visant Corporation;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrants’ auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

| Date: May 14, 2007 |   | /s/ Paul B.  Carousso            |
|--------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|               |   | Paul B. Carousso                 |
|               |   | *Vice  President, Finance*       |
|               |   | *(principal  financial officer)* |

 

----
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
GARY LEE NORMAN, ) DOC #H20835, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2188 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed April 5, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Neil A. Roddenbery, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowitz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Gary Lee Norman, Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Peter Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
VILLANTI, LUCAS and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39802-39803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14382]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY: Commission on the Social Status of Black Men and Boys (CSSBMB), 
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of CSSBMB public briefing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Friday, July 8, 2022. 1:00 p.m.-3:30 p.m. EDT.

ADDRESSES: The Briefing will take place virtually via YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/USCCR/videos.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Marvin Williams, 202-339-
2371,<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#037371667070616e614376706060712d646c75"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bececcdbcdcddcd3dcfecbcdddddcc90d9d1c8">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Public Law 116-156, 1134 
Stat. 700 (2020), the Commission on the Social Status of Black Men and 
Boys (CSSBMB) will hold a public briefing focused on preventative 
strategies to mitigate the social disparities of Black men in America.
    This briefing is open to the public via livestream on the 
Commission on Civil Rights' YouTube Page at https://www.youtube.com/user/USCCR/videos. (Streaming information subject to change.) Public 
participation is available for the event with view access, along with 
an audio option for listening. Computer assisted real-time 
transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in 
English) on Friday, July 8, 2022, is

[[Page 39803]]

https://www.steamtext.net/player?event=USCCR (*subject to change). 
Please note that CART is text-only translation that occurs in real time 
during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.
    * Date and meeting details are subject to change. For more 
information on the CSSBMB or the upcoming public briefing, please visit 
CSSBMB's website at www.usccr.gov/about/CSSBMB.

Briefing Agenda

I. Opening Remarks by CSSBMB Chair, Frederica S. Wilson
II. Call to Order
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. Roundtable Discussion With Expert Panelists *
    A. The Honorable Frederica Wilson, Congresswoman (FL-24) and CSSBMB 
Chair
    B. The Honorable Jamaal Bowman, Congressman (NY-16) and CSSBMB 
Commissioner (Roundtable Moderator)
    C. Dr. Gregory C. Hutchings Jr.--Alexandria City Schools
    D. CSSBMB Commissioner Jack Brewer--The Brewer Group
    E. Dr. Robert Simmons--Head of Social Impact and STEM Programs
    F. Troy Vincent--Vice President of Operations for the NFL
    G. Timothy Belcher Sr.--Special Advisor to the City Manager
V. Adjourn Briefing

    Dated: June 30, 2022.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2022-14382 Filed 6-30-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE v. GREEN.

No. COA04-1637.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the New Hanover (02CRS20177)

Case reported without published opinion Affirmed.