alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Robert M. BERSIN v. Julia R. GOLONKA.

No. 310P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Michelle D. Reingold, for Robert M. Bersin.

Nelson M. Casstevens, Jr., Charlotte, for Julia R. Golonka.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of June 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying annual report on Form 10-K of Superior TeleCom Inc. (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Periodic Report"), I, Stephen C. Knup,
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, that the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: April 15, 2003 |  | /s/STEPHEN C. KNUPStephen C. Knup
President and Chief Operating Officer
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.27

                                Ellen Tracy, Inc.
                               565 Seventh Avenue
                            New York, New York 10018

                                  June 17, 1998

Mr. Hugh Gaither
President
Ridgeview, Inc.
2101 North Main Street
Newton, North Carolina  28658

Dear Mr. Gaither:

         This will confirm that, pursuant to Sections 3 and 27 of the License
Agreement between Ellen Tracy, Inc. and Ridgeview, Inc. ("Licensee"), dated as
of January 1, 1994 ("Agreement"), as extended and amended by a letter dated
October 22, 1996 between us, the Agreement is further extended, for a three-year
term, to December 31, 2000 ("Renewal Term").

         Pursuant to Section 27 of the Agreement, this will also confirm that
the Agreement is modified to provide that, during the Renewal Term, Licensee
will be required to pay Guaranteed Minimum Royalties, to make the Projected
Annual Sales (both as defined in Section 4(b) of the Agreement) and to expend
the National Advertising Amount (as defined in Section 5(b) of the Agreement) in
the following amounts:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For Annual Period            Projected Annual Sales     Guaranteed Minimum         National Advertising
Commencing                                              Royalties                  Amount

<S>                          <C>                        <C>                        <C> 
January 1, 1998              $6,500,000                 $400,000                   $300,000
January 1, 1999              $7,500,000                 $475,000                   $400,000
January 1, 2000              $8,000,000                 $525,000                   $425,000
</TABLE>

         Except as expressly modified hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect.

         Please indicate your agreement by signing where indicated below, and
return your original signed copy of this letter to me.

                                          Sincerely,

                                          Ellen Tracy, Inc.

                                          By: /s/ Howard Rosenberger
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Howard Rosenberger
Agreed and accepted:
Ridgeview, Inc.

By: /s/ Hugh R. Gaither  
   ------------------------------           
   President and CEO

Date:  6-25-98
     ----------------------------
Charles D. MORELAND v. Clifford JOHNSON.

No. 296P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 3, 2005.

Charles Moreland, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 2nd day of June 2005 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Buncombe County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of June 2005."
STATE v. Barry Wayne MARCUS.

No. 177P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Steven F. Bryant, Assistant Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of April 2005 by Defendant for Permission to File a Reply to the State's Response to Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of June 2005."
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF				 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER				 AND				 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO				 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,				 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

			I, Kerry Tully, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Lutcam, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (i)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                 |

|   | By:    | */s/ Kerry Tully*           |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------|
|        |        |                             |
|   | Name:  | Kerry Tully                 |
|   |   |                        |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer     |
|   |   |                        |
|   | Date:  | February 13, 2007           |

----
# L_2016314DE.01007201.xml

| 22.11.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 314/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 314/72

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2016/679 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 27. April 2016 zum Schutz natürlicher Personen bei der Verarbeitung personenbezogener Daten, zum freien Datenverkehr und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 95/46/EG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 119 vom 4. Mai 2016
  )

Seite 50, Artikel 28 Absatz 7

Anstatt:

„(7)   Die Kommission kann im Einklang mit dem Prüfverfahren gemäß Artikel 87 Absatz 2 Standardvertragsklauseln zur Regelung der in den Absätzen 3 und 4 des vorliegenden Artikels genannten Fragen festlegen.“

muss es heißen:

„(7)   Die Kommission kann im Einklang mit dem Prüfverfahren gemäß Artikel 93 Absatz 2 Standardvertragsklauseln zur Regelung der in den Absätzen 3 und 4 des vorliegenden Artikels genannten Fragen festlegen.“

Seite 51, Artikel 30 Absatz 5

Anstatt:

„(5)   Die in den Absätzen 1 und 2 genannten Pflichten gelten nicht für Unternehmen oder Einrichtungen, die weniger als 250 Mitarbeiter beschäftigen, sofern die von ihnen vorgenommene Verarbeitung nicht ein Risiko für die Rechte und Freiheiten der betroffenen Personen birgt, die Verarbeitung nicht nur gelegentlich erfolgt oder nicht die Verarbeitung besonderer Datenkategorien gemäß Artikel 9 Absatz 1 bzw. die Verarbeitung von personenbezogenen Daten über strafrechtliche Verurteilungen und Straftaten im Sinne des Artikels 10 einschließt.“

muss es heißen:

„(5)   Die in den Absätzen 1 und 2 genannten Pflichten gelten nicht für Unternehmen oder Einrichtungen, die weniger als 250 Mitarbeiter beschäftigen, es sei denn, die von ihnen vorgenommene Verarbeitung birgt ein Risiko für die Rechte und Freiheiten der betroffenen Personen, die Verarbeitung erfolgt nicht nur gelegentlich oder es erfolgt eine Verarbeitung besonderer Datenkategorien gemäß Artikel 9 Absatz 1 bzw. die Verarbeitung von personenbezogenen Daten über strafrechtliche Verurteilungen und Straftaten im Sinne des Artikels 10.“

Seite 52 Artikel 33 Absatz 1

Anstatt:

„Im Falle einer Verletzung des Schutzes personenbezogener Daten meldet der Verantwortliche unverzüglich und möglichst binnen 72 Stunden, nachdem ihm die Verletzung bekannt wurde, diese der gemäß Artikel 51 zuständigen Aufsichtsbehörde, ...“

muss es heißen:

„Im Falle einer Verletzung des Schutzes personenbezogener Daten meldet der Verantwortliche unverzüglich und möglichst binnen 72 Stunden, nachdem ihm die Verletzung bekannt wurde, diese der gemäß Artikel 55 zuständigen Aufsichtsbehörde, ...“

---
INDIANA 

ηϯϬ

Ψρ͘κ^WEd/E

STATE 

ηϯς

ϭ͘κйK&^dd'W

ϭ͘Ϭй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

ΨΘϬϬ

PER RESIDENT 

#27 

Ψκ͘ϬKEdZd

SPENDING 

ηϮς

ϯϭ͕ρςΘEhDZK&

PERSONNEL 

ηϮε

Ψϭ͘κWZ^KEE>

SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ

ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ ϭй

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ Ϯςй

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐĂŶĚ

ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ϳй

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ςςй

By Service 

Army 

31% 

Navy/Marines 

36% 

Air Force 

16% 

Other Defense 

16% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Active Duty: 3% 

Civilian: 39% 

Reserve: 17% 

National 

Guard: 41% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

53% 

Navy/Marines 

18% 

Air Force 

14% 

Other Defense 

15% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ZŽůůƐͲZŽLJĐĞ ΨΘρΘ͘ϬD

DĂĐŶĚƌĞǁƐΘ&ŽƌďĞƐ/ŶĐ͘ ΨϳςϬ͘εD

ZĂLJƚŚĞŽŶ ΨρϬϳ͘ϭD

ŵĞƌŝYƵĂů'ƌŽƵƉ ΨϭεϮ͘ϭD

ZW^K Ψϭςρ͘ςD

^/ Ψϭκς͘ρD

,ŽŶĞLJǁĞůů ΨϭϬϬ͘ρD

DĂŶƚĞĐŚd^'ͲϮ:s ΨΘϭ͘ϯD

dĂůďĞƌƚDĂŶƵĨĂĐƚƵƌŝŶŐ/ŶĐ͘ Ψϳϯ͘ϬD

ƵŵŵŝŶƐ Ψϳϭ͘ςD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψκ͘Ϭ

Ψϯ͘Ϭ Ψϯ͘Ϯ Ψϯ͘ϭ ΨϮ͘ε ΨϮ͘ϳ

&zϭϮ

ΨϮ͘κ ΨϮ͘ϭ

&zϭϯ &zϭκ &zϭρ &zϭς &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Ψϭ͘κ/>>/KE ϯϭ͕ρςΘ

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

ŽƵŶƚLJ ĐƟǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

DĂƌŝŽŶ ϯϭϯ ρ͕ρϳρ Ϯ͕κϮρ

DĂƌƟŶ ςϭ κ͕εϭε Ϭ

DŝĂŵŝ ϭϳ ρϭϯ ϯΘ

:ŽŚŶƐŽŶ ϯϭκ Ϯρε ϭ͕κςρ

ůůĞŶ ϯε ϮϳϮ ϭ͕ϯϳϬ

sŝŐŽ Ϯϭ ϭςΘ ϭ͕ϬκϬ

>ĂŬĞ E ςϮ ρκϯ

dŝƉƉĞĐĂŶŽĞ ϳρ ϯϬ ρϮρ

^ƚ͘:ŽƐĞƉŚ ϳϭ ρϭ Ϯρϳ

sĂŶĚĞƌďƵƌŐŚ ρϳ ϯϬ ϯϳϬ

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

ϭ͕ϯΘΘ ε͕ϳϬϭ

Ϭ κ͕εΘϬ

ϭ͕Θκε Ϯ͕κϭϳ

ϮρϬ Ϯ͕ϮΘΘ

ϯϯΘ Ϯ͕Ϭϭε

ϮϬκ ϭ͕κϯϯ

ϭςϬ E

ϭϯϬ ϳςϬ

ϯρκ ϳϯϯ

ϭςϭ ςϭΘ

κς KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR 2 0 1 8 INDIANA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

>ĂŬĞ

dŝƉƉĞĐĂŶŽĞ

^ŚĞůďLJ

:ŽŚŶƐŽŶ

sŝŐŽ

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

tŚŝƚůĞLJ

:ĂƐƉĞƌ ůůĞŶ

DŝĂŵŝ

DĂƌŝŽŶ

ĂƌƚŚŽůŽŵĞǁ

DĂƌƚŝŶ

ĂǀŝĞƐƐ

sĂŶĚĞƌďƵƌŐŚ

^ƚ͘:ŽƐĞƉŚ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

DĂƌŝŽŶ

^ƚ͘:ŽƐĞƉŚ

DĂƌƟŶ

ůůĞŶ

sĂŶĚĞƌďƵƌŐŚ

tŚŝƚůĞLJ

ĂǀŝĞƐƐ

:ĂƐƉĞƌ

ĂƌƚŚŽůŽŵĞǁ

DŝĂŵŝ

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψϭ͘κ

ΨεϮρ͘ϭD

Ψϯςρ͘εD

ΨϮεϯ͘ΘD

ΨϮϬϯ͘ϳD

Ψϭϳϯ͘ϯD

Ψϭϭε͘ϯD

Ψϳϯ͘ϬD

$72.4 M 

Ψκς͘ρD

DĂƌŝŽŶ

DĂƌƟŶ

DŝĂŵŝ

:ŽŚŶƐŽŶ

ůůĞŶ

sŝŐŽ

dŝƉƉĞĐĂŶŽĞ

^ƚ͘:ŽƐĞƉŚ

>ĂŬĞ

^ŚĞůďLJ

ΨρϮρ͘ϮD

ΨκϭϬ͘εD

Ψϳε͘ΘD

Ψϳρ͘ϯD

ΨρϮ͘ρD

Ψκϯ͘ΘD

ΨϮΘ͘ϭD

Ψϭς͘ςD

Ψϭς͘ϬD

Ψϭκ͘ϭD

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

ůůĞŶ

DŝĂŵŝ

DĂƌƚŝŶ

^ƚ͘:ŽƐĞƉŚ

DĂƌŝŽŶ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε κϳ
IN RE Ricardo J. CALDERON-LOPEZ, Petitioner.

No. 19-6702

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Petition for writ of mandamus denied.
ATWOOD v. EAGLE.

No. COA04-501.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 15, 2005.

Certification Date April 4, 2005.

Appeal from the Davie (02CVS541).

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 4, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                   |  |  |  |                                                                    
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 19, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    Marc L. Reisch                                              
|                   |  |  |  | Marc L. Reisch                                                     
|                   |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Antonio Lamarquisa RIPLEY.

No. 489A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

M. Elizabeth Guzman, Assistant Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Thomas R. Sallenger, Wilson, for Antonio L. Ripley.

*38*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 6th day of September 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
NEILL GRADING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. David B. LINGAFELT and Newton Conover Communications, Inc.

No. 112PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 2005.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 168 N.C.App. 36, 606 S.E.2d 734 (2005), dismissing an interlocutory appeal from an order denying summary judgment entered 17 November 2003 by Judge Robert C. Ervin in Superior Court, Catawba County. Heard in the Supreme Court 16 November 2005.

Patrick, Harper & Dixon L.L.P., by Stephen M. Thomas and Michael J. Barnett, Hickory, for plaintiff-appellee.

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P., by Mark J. Prak and Charles E. Coble, Greensboro, for defendant-appellants.

The Bussian Law Firm, PLLC, by John A. Bussian, for North Carolina Association of Broadcasters and North Carolina Press Association, amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
STATE v. BLACK

No. COA04-723

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed February 1, 2005

Certification Date February 21, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 126 (Friday, July 1, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 39337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14246]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement

30 CFR Part 254


Oil-Spill Response Requirements for Facilities Located Seward of 
the Coast Line

CFR Correction

    This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register 
to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most 
recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    In Title 30 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 200 to 699, 
revised as of July 1, 2021, amend Sec.  254.54, by removing ``Regional 
Supervisor'' in the first sentence, and adding in its place ``Chief, 
OSPD,''.

[FR Doc. 2022-14246 Filed 6-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099-10-P
STATE v. Junious Lee RHUE, Jr.

No. 348P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of June 2005 by Defendant to be allowed to proceed in forma pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of June 2005."
1. Home
2. Education
3. Planet Stewards
4. NOAA Planet Stewards Webinar Videos
5. Developing-Inquiry Based Earth Systems Education Activities With NOAA View!

**Developing-Inquiry Based Earth Systems Education Activities With NOAA View!**  NOAA curates a treasure trove of environmental data, but one that is not always easily accessed, especially for educational purposes. Traditional data portals in NOAA require knowledge of specific observation platform names, models, and analyses, along with nomenclature for variable outputs. NOAA View attempts to remedy this. The NOAA View portal provides a seamless entry point into data from across the agency: satellite, climate models, in-situ analysis, etc. NOAA View is really a data exploration tool, with an archive of variables that visually describe processes on land and in the ocean, atmosphere, cryosphere, and climate system. The system allows the user to browse, animate, and download high resolution imagery, Google Earth, and will eventually allow dataset comparison, graphing and access to proxy data files. *Dan Pisut*
 At the time of this broadcast, Dan Pisut was the program manager of the NOAA Environmental Visualization Lab.. Dan has used his background in environmental research and secondary education to create scientific visualizations that simplified complex topics and were impactful to the viewer. As a writer, producer, and director, Dan oversaw the conceptualization and execution of visualizations in consultation with scientific experts at NOAA. His team’s visualizations and data services have routinely been incorporated into classrooms, museum exhibits, primetime news coverage, and award-winning documentaries around the world.  Educational Resources NOAA’s Environmental Visualization Laboratory NOAA View Data Imagery Portal NOAA’s Data in the Classroom NOAA’s Climate.Gov CLEAN Collection Resources on Data Visualization NCAR Climate Systems Visualizations
 **Education** Upcoming Events The Watch: Newsletter Archives  Webinar Archives  Book Club Archives  Education Resources  **Stewardship**  Planet Stewards homepage Supporting Stewardship  Funded Projects  Focus Areas Applying for Funding  *Subscribe to the NOAA Planet Stewards Mailing List.* View our archive of past newsletters. Your E-mail Address:
  Social
  **Last updated:** 03/13/23 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
#### Ely GLAZER, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America.

No. 14767.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

June 16, 1953.

Morris A. Shenker and Martin Rosenberg, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

William W. Crowdus, U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, 110 F.Supp. 558, on joint motion of counsel for respective parties.
STATE of North Carolina v. Tyrone Edward CHEEK.

No. 299P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Thomas K. Maher, Chapel Hill, for Tyrone E. Cheek.

Robert J. Blum, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*852*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of June 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 38405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13823]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:  87 FR 36325.

PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 

Thursday, June 23, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

    Hybrid Meeting: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12\th\ Floor) 
and virtual.

CHANGES IN THE MEETING: 
    The following matter was also considered:
    Draft Advisory Opinion 2022-08: National Republican Congressional 
Committee (``NRCC'').

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Vicktoria J. Allen,
Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-13823 Filed 6-24-22; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10-KSB of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VII, LP, (the Partnership) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive
Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 6, 2007



|                                                                                       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dean Cash                                                                          
|Dean L. Cash                                                                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial
Services, LLC (General Partner)