Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40489 

1See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel 

Plate Products from the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 87 FR 11410 

(March 1, 2022) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Cut-to-Length 

Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from the 

Republic of Korea: Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

3See Notice of Amendment of Final 

Determinations of Sales at Less Than Fair Value 

and Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Cut-ToLength Carbon-Quality Steel Plate Products from 

France, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan and the 

Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6585 (February 10, 2000) 

(Order). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Jonathan Chesebro, Office of Energy & 

Environmental Industries, International 

Trade Administration (Phone: 202–482– 

1297; email: jonathan.chesebro@

trade.gov). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background: The CINTAC was 

established under the discretionary 

authority of the Secretary of Commerce 

and in accordance with the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 

U.S.C. app.), in response to an identified 

need for consensus advice from U.S. 

industry to the U.S. Government 

regarding the development and 

administration of programs to expand 

United States exports of civil nuclear 

goods and services in accordance with 

applicable U.S. laws and regulations, 

including advice on how U.S. civil 

nuclear goods and services export 

policies, programs, and activities will 

affect the U.S. civil nuclear industry’s 

competitiveness and ability to 

participate in the international market. 

The Department of Commerce 

renewed the CINTAC charter on August 

5, 2020. This meeting is being convened 

under the seventh charter of the 

CINTAC. 

Topics to be considered: The agenda 

for the CINTAC meeting on Thursday, 

August 4, 2022, is as follows: 

Closed Session (10:00 a.m.–1:00 

p.m.)—Discussion of matters 

determined to be exempt from the 

provisions of the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act relating to public 

meetings found in 5 U.S.C. app. 

(10)(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The session will 

be closed to the public pursuant to 

Section 10(d) of FACA as amended by 

Section 5(c) of the Government in 

Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, and 

in accordance with Section 552b(c)(4) 

and Section 552b(c)(9)(B) of Title 5, 

United States Code, which authorize 

closure of meetings that are ‘‘likely to 

disclose trade secrets and commercial or 

financial information obtained from a 

person and privileged or confidential’’ 

and ‘‘likely to significantly frustrate 

implementation of a proposed agency 

action,’’ respectively. The part of the 

meeting that will be closed will address 

(1) nuclear cooperation agreements; (2) 

encouraging ratification of the 

Convention on Supplementary 

Compensation for Nuclear Damage; and 

(3) identification of specific trade 

barriers impacting the U.S. civil nuclear 

industry. 

Public Session (1:00 p.m.–3:00 

p.m.)—Discuss work of the 

subcommittees, review of deliberative 

recommendations, and opportunity to 

hear from members of the public. 

Members of the public wishing to attend 

the public session of the meeting must 

notify Mr. Chesebro at the contact 

information above by 5:00 p.m. EDT on 

Friday, July 29, 2022 in order to preregister to participate. Please specify 

any requests for reasonable 

accommodation at least five business 

days in advance of the meeting. Last 

minute requests will be accepted but 

may not be possible to fill. A limited 

amount of time will be available for 

brief oral comments from members of 

the public attending the meeting. To 

accommodate as many speakers as 

possible, the time for public comments 

will be limited to two (2) minutes per 

person, with a total public comment 

period of 30 minutes. Individuals 

wishing to reserve speaking time during 

the meeting must contact Mr. Chesebro 

and submit a brief statement of the 

general nature of the comments and the 

name and address of the proposed 

participant by 5:00 p.m. EDT on Friday, 

July 29, 2022. If the number of 

registrants requesting to make 

statements is greater than can be 

reasonably accommodated during the 

meeting, the International Trade 

Administration may conduct a lottery to 

determine the speakers. 

Any member of the public may 

submit written comments concerning 

the CINTAC’s affairs at any time before 

or after the meeting. Comments may be 

submitted to Mr. Jonathan Chesebro at 

Jonathan.chesebro@trade.gov. For 

consideration during the meeting, and 

to ensure transmission to the Committee 

prior to the meeting, comments must be 

received no later than 5:00 p.m. EDT on 

Friday, July 29, 2022. Comments 

received after that date will be 

distributed to the members but may not 

be considered at the meeting. 

Copies of CINTAC meeting minutes 

will be available within 90 days of the 

meeting. 

Dated: July 1, 2022. 

Man K. Cho, 

Deputy Director, Office of Energy and 

Environmental Industries. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14485 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–836] 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate Products From the 

Republic of Korea: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

the producers/exporters subject to this 

review made sales of subject 

merchandise at less than normal value 

during the period of review (POR) 

February 1, 2020, through January 31, 

2021. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andre Gziryan, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2201. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 1, 2022, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of the 

2020–2021 administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on certain cutto-length carbon-quality steel plate 

products (CTL plate) from the Republic 

of Korea (Korea).1 For a complete 

description of the events that occurred 

since the Preliminary Results, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.2

Scope of the Order 3

The products covered by the Order 

are certain CTL plate from Korea. For a 

full description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
40490 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

4See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

5See, e.g., Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate Products from the Republic of Korea: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2019–2020, 86 FR 56889 (October 13, 

2021). 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the parties’ case 

and rebuttal briefs in this administrative 

review are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum and are listed in 

the appendix to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

the comments received from interested 

parties regarding our Preliminary 

Results, and for the reasons explained in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 

we did not make changes to the 

preliminary calculation of the weightedaverage dumping margin for the sole 

mandatory respondent, Hyundai Steel 

Company (Hyundai Steel), and the 

margin assigned to the non-selected 

respondents. 

Final Results of the Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period February 1, 

2020, through January 31, 2021: 

Producer/ 

exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Hyundai Steel Company ............. 6.09 

Rate Applicable to the Following NonSelected Companies: 

Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd ........ 6.09 

BDP International ....................... 6.09 

Sung Jin Steel Co., Ltd .............. 6.09 

Disclosure 

Normally, Commerce discloses to the 

parties in a proceeding the calculations 

performed in connection with the final 

results of review within five days of any 

public announcement or, if there is no 

public announcement, within five days 

of the date of publication of the notice 

of final results in the Federal Register.4

However, because Commerce made no 

adjustments to the margin calculation 

methodology used in the Preliminary 

Results, there are no revised 

calculations to disclose for the final 

results of review. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce intends to determine, and 

U.S. Customs and Border Protections 

(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties 

on all appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), for Hyundai Steel, 

we calculated importer-specific ad 

valorem duty assessment rates based on 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of the 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1). Where an importerspecific assessment rate is de minimis 

(i.e., less than 0.5 percent), the entries 

by that importer will be liquidated 

without reference to antidumping 

duties. 

For all non-selected respondents 

subject to this review, we will instruct 

CBP to liquidate all entries of subject 

merchandise that entered the United 

States during the POR at the rates 

calculated for Hyundai Steel listed 

above. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Hyundai 

Steel for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we intend to instruct CBP 

to liquidate such entries at the all-others 

rate if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company or companies 

involved in the transaction. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of CTL plate from Korea 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication of the notice of final results 

of this administrative review in the 

Federal Register, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash 

deposit rate for companies subject to 

this review will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established in the final results of this 

administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by companies not 

covered in this review but covered in 

the most recently completed segment of 

this proceeding, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most 

recent period; (3) if the exporter is not 

a firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation but the 

producer is, then the cash deposit rate 

will be the company-specific rate 

established for the most recently 

completed segment for the producer of 

the merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other producers or 

exporters will continue to be 0.98 

percent,5 the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation, adjusted for 

the export subsidy rate in the 

companion countervailing duty 

investigation. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

has occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders (APO) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40491 

1See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and 

Rescission of Review, in Part; 2019, 87 FR 748 

(January 23, 2022) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Time Limit for 

Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated April 19, 2022. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Post-Preliminary Results 

Analysis Memorandum,’’ dated May 6, 2022 (PostPreliminary Results Analysis Memorandum), at 8. 

4See JA Solar’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated May 

16, 2022. 

5See GOC’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated May 16, 

2022. 

6See The Alliance’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief,’’ dated 

May 16, 2022. 

7See Risen’s Letter, ‘‘Case Brief-Resubmitted,’’ 

dated June 2, 2022. 

8See JA Trina’s Letter, ‘‘Letter in Lieu of Case 

Brief,’’ dated May 16, 2022. These seven companies 

are: Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and 

Technology Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina Guoneng 

Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. (formerly 

Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.); 

Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd., Turpin Trina 

Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Hefei) Science 

and Technology Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar Hezhong 

Photoelectric Co., Ltd.; and Changzhou Trina Solar 

Yabang Energy Co. Ltd. 

9See The Alliance’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ 

dated May 25, 2022. 

10See the GOC’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated 

May 25, 2022. 

11See Risen’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Brief,’’ dated May 

25, 2022. 

12See JA Solar’s Letter, ‘‘Rebuttal Case Brief,’’ 

dated May 25, 2022. 

13See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Public Hearing 

Schedule,’’ dated June 2, 2022; see also Transcript, 

‘‘Public Hearing,’’ dated June 14, 2022. 

14On December 7, 2012, the Order was published. 

See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether 

or Not Assembled into Modules, from the People’s 

Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order, 77 

FR 73017 (December 7, 2012). On December 17, 

2021, based on a changed circumstances review, the 

Order was amended. See Crystalline Silicon 

Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into 

Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Changed Circumstances Reviews, and 

Revocation of the Antidumping and Countervailing 

Duty Orders, in Part, 86 FR 71615 (December 21, 

2021) (Order). 

15See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results and Partial 

Recission of the Administrative Review of the 

Countervailing Duty Order on Crystalline Silicon 

Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into 

Modules, from the People’s Republic of China; 

2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

16See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

Dated: June 29, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Smooth Hyundai Steel’s Costs 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Select Dongkuk Steel Mill Co., Ltd. 

(Dongkuk) as a Voluntary Respondent 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–14423 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–980] 

Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, 

Whether or Not Assembled Into 

Modules, From the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results and Partial 

Rescission of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2019 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers/exporters of 

crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, 

whether or not assembled into modules 

(solar cells), from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) during the period of 

review (POR) January 1, 2019, through 

December 31, 2019. Commerce is also 

rescinding this review with respect to 

fifty-four companies that had no 

reviewable entries during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Copyak, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3642. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On January 6, 2022, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results of 

this administrative review.1 On April 

19, 2022, we extended the time limit for 

the final results.2 On May 6, 2022, we 

issued a Post-Preliminary Results 

Analysis Memorandum, and we invited 

comments from interested parties on 

both the Preliminary Results and the 

Post-Preliminary Analysis 

Memorandum.3 We received timely case 

briefs from the following interested 

parties: (1) mandatory respondent JA 

Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd. 

(JA Solar); 4 (2) the Government of China 

(GOC); 5 (3) domestic interested party 

the American Alliance for Solar 

Manufacturing (the Alliance); 6 and (4) 

mandatory respondent Risen Energy Co. 

Ltd. (Risen).7 Trina Solar Co, Ltd. and 

seven of its cross-owned companies 

(collectively, Trina) filed a letter in lieu 

of case brief.8 On May 25, 2022, we 

received timely rebuttal briefs from: (1) 

the Alliance,9 (2) the GOC,10 (3) Risen,11

and (4) JA Solar.12 On June 14, 2022, we 

conducted a public hearing.13

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are solar cells from China.14 For a full 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.15

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the interested 

parties’ briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of topics discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is provided in 

Appendix I to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

After evaluating the comments 

received from interested parties and 

record information, we made certain 

changes from the Preliminary Results 

regarding the calculations of Risen and 

JA Solar’s program rates. These changes 

are explained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For 

each subsidy program found to be 

countervailable, Commerce finds that 

there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial 

contribution from a government or 

public entity that gives rise to a benefit 

to the recipient, and that the subsidy is 

specific.16 For a description of the 

methodology underlying all of 

Commerce’s conclusions, including any 

determination that relied upon the use 

of adverse facts available pursuant to 

section 776(a) and (b) of the Act, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES