alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Themed Restaurants, Inc., Doing Business as Lucky Cheng’s, Appellant, v Zagat Survey, LLC, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

[801 NYS2d 38]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.), entered August 25, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted defendant’s motion insofar as to dismiss plaintiffs causes of action for defamation, trade libel and negligence, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The complained-of restaurant review appearing in the 2004 edition of defendant’s Zagat Survey of New York City Restaurants does not furnish an actionable basis for a defamation or trade libel claim. The Zagat Survey features reviews compiled from surveys submitted to Zagat from members of the public. Plaintiff restaurant, as described by its owner, is a theme restaurant with a drag queen cabaret, where female impersonators are both waiters and performers, and customer participation contributes to the entertainment. The Zagat Survey rated plaintiff restaurant at “9” or “fair” for food, and “15” or *827“good” for both decor and service. The review further contained the allegedly libelous statements that “God knows ‘you don’t go for the food,’ ” and “weary well-wishers suggest that they ‘freshen up the menu and their makeup.’ ” These quotes were taken from comments made by the consumer participants in the Zagat Survey.

The motion court properly concluded that there is no reason to depart from the traditional legal analysis applied when assessing defamation claims simply because the review at issue is not that of an individual diner, but rather an edited summary of multiple anonymous consumer opinions. Plaintiff fails to draw any meaningful distinction between the Zagat Survey and other reviews that would warrant novel legal analysis.

The allegedly libelous statements can only be construed as statements of opinion and thus are constitutionally protected *(see Guerrero v Carva,*10 AD3d 105, 111 [2004]). Indeed, restaurant ratings and reviews almost invariably constitute expressions of opinion *(see e.g. Mr. Chow of N.Y. v Ste. Jour Azur*S.A., 759 F2d 219 [1985]).

Finally, since plaintiffs negligence claim is based upon the very same factual allegations underlying its defamation claim and, like the defamation claim, seeks redress for injury to reputation, the negligence claim was properly dismissed as duplicative *(see Sarwer v Conde Nast Publs., Inc.,*237 AD2d 191 [1997]). Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ. *(See*4 Misc 3d 974.]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5261 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5261

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Reactive Black 5.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Reactive Black 5.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REACTIVE BLACK 5.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.91 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Reactive Black 5) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (the “Form
10-K/A”) for the year ended December 31, 2016 of Empire Resources, Inc. (the “Company”). I, Nathan Kahn, the
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Form 10-K/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in this report.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 28, 2017



| | By:    | /s/ Nathan Kahn                                                     
| | ------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | Nathan Kahn                                                         
| | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer)



The foregoing certification is being furnished
as an exhibit to the Form 10-K/A pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly,
is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K/A for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of
any general incorporation language in such filing.
# Official Journal L 278/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 278 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6326 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 278

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6326 August 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1208 of 7 August 2020 on structure, format, submission processes and review of information reported by Member States pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 749/2014 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1208 of 7 August 2020 on structure, format, submission processes and review of information reported by Member States pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 749/2014 (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5383 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5383

    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,2-Dimethyl-3-(3-
                         methylphenyl)proponal.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mr. Brown of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2,2-Dimethyl-3-(3-
                         methylphenyl)proponal.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2,2-DIMETHYL-3-(3-METHYLPHENYL)PROPONAL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.01.39 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2,2-Dimethyl-3-(3-
methylphenyl)proponal) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5078 

To extend the suspension of duty on Desmodur BL XP 2468. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2008 

Mr. TIM MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Desmodur BL XP 

2468. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESMODUR BL XP 2468. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.12 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Copolymer of methyl ethyl ketoxime and toluenediisocya7 nate) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting 

8 ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5078 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 18, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Marc L. Reisch                                                                
|                      |  |  |  | Marc L. Reisch President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
Caroline D'AQUISTO, Plaintiff v. MISSION ST. JOSEPH'S HEALTH SYSTEM, Employer. Cambridge Integrated Services, Servicing Agent, Defendants.

No. 415PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Allan R. Tarleton, Research Triangle Park, for Health System.

Thomas F. Ramer, for Caroline D'Aquisto.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of August 2005 by Defendant (Mission St. Joseph's Health System) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision *179of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."

Defendant (Mission St. Joseph's Health System shall) forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
STATE of North Carolina v. Brandon Omar GRAHAM.

No. 264P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Andrew G. Schopler, Chapel Hill, for Brandon Omar Graham.Diane Martin Pomper, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 3rd day of June 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
**Exhibit 10.24**

 

**AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATEDEMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEENGENERAL MOLY, INC., SUCCESSOR TO IDAHO GENERAL MINES, INC.ANDANDREW J. RUSSELL**

 

**RECITALS**

** **

1.             ThisAmendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Amendment”) is betweenAndrew J. Russell (“Employee”) and General Moly, Inc., the successorto Idaho General Mines, Inc. (“the Company”).

 

2.             TheCompany’s predecessor, Idaho General Mines, Inc., and Employee entered anAmended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) on January 30,2007.

 

3.             TheAmended and Restated Employment Agreement referenced herein remains in fullforce and effect, except as set forth below.

 

NOW, IN CONSIDERATION of the foregoing, and therespective covenants and promises of the parties, the Company and the Employeeenter this Amendment and agree as follows:

 

1.             Section 3.2(b) ofthe parties’ Agreement is hereby changed to provide that the “Annual Bonus,”payable to Employee in accordance with that Section 3.2(b), shall be paidon or before forty-five (45) days following the end of each calendar yearwithin the term of the Agreement.

 

2.             Accordingly,the parties agree, in accordance with the conditions contained in Section 3.2(b) ofthe Agreement, the Company will pay Employee an Annual Bonus on or beforeforty-five (45) days following December 31, 2007, within forty-five (45)days following December 31, 2008, and within thirty (30) days following December 31,2009.  The remaining provisions of theAgreement, and of Section 3.2(b) of the Agreement, will remainunchanged, including those provisions dealing with the conditions under whichEmployee is eligible for an Annual Bonus.

 

The parties have executed this Amendment on the datesset forth below, to be effective as of the later of such dates.

 
|    |   | COMPANY:                |
|---------|--------|-------------------------|
|    |   | General Moly, Inc. |
|    |   |                    |
| 1/14/08 |   | By:                     | /s/ Bruce Hansen |
| Date    |   | Its:                    | CEO |
|    |   |                    |
|    |   | EMPLOYEE:               |
|    |   |                    |
| 1/14/08 |   | /s/ Andy Russell        |
| Date    |   | Andrew J. Russell       |

 

----
BARHAM v. HAWK, et al.

No. 461PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 5, 2005.

Scott M. Stevenson, Kathleen K. Lucchesi, S. Frederick Winiker, III, Patricia Wilson Magee, Charlotte, for Hawk & Ear, Nose & Throat.

E. Hardy Lewis, for Gloria Barham.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 5th day of July 2005 by Plaintiff for extension of time to file brief until 8/1/05:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Barham) shall have up to and including the 1st day of August 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 5th day of July 2005."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 23-0185 

IN RE MONTANA STATE FUND’S 

APPLICATION FOR RELEASE OF 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

CONFIDENTIAL CRIMINAL 

JUSTICE INFORMATION 

CONCERNING MATTHEW AILER, 

CDC-2014-98. 

APPELLEE’S UNOPPOSED 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 

TIME TO FILE 

ANSWERING BRIEF 

Appellee, Montana State Fund, has moved the Court, pursuant to Montana 

Rules of Appellate Procedure 26(1), for an extension of time to file its Answering 

Brief, currently due on June 14, 2023. Good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee Montana State Fund has up to and 

including July 14, 2023, in which to file its Answering Brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

May 26 2023

05/26/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0185
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5298 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5298

    To deny a rebate of Federal income taxes to illegal immigrants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

Mr. Kanjorski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To deny a rebate of Federal income taxes to illegal immigrants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DENIAL OF 2008 REBATE OF FEDERAL INCOME TAXES TO ILLEGAL 
              IMMIGRANTS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a 
nonresident alien individual shall not be eligible for a rebate of 
Federal income taxes provided by an Act of Congress enacted during 
2008.
    (b) Identification Number Requirement.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, no rebate of Federal income taxes provided by an Act of 
        Congress enacted during 2008 shall be allowed to an individual 
        who does not include on the return of tax for the taxable 
        year--
                    (A) such individual's valid identification number,
                    (B) in the case of a joint return, the valid 
                identification number of such individual's spouse, and
                    (C) in the case of any qualifying child taken into 
                account under such Act providing for such rebate, the 
                valid identification number of such qualifying child.
            (2) Valid identification number.--For purposes of paragraph 
        (1), the term ``valid identification number'' means a social 
        security number issued to an individual by the Social Security 
        Administration. Such term shall not include a TIN issued by the 
        Internal Revenue Service.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2016259EN.01007901.xml

| 27.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 259/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 259/79

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1047 of 28 June 2016 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 170 of 29 June 2016
  )

On page 39, in the Annex, in point (b)(1) amending the rows concerning CN codes 3215 to 3215 90 00 of Part Two of Annex I to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87, in footnote (5):

for:

‘Solid ink in engineered shapes for insertion into apparatus of subheadings 8443 31, 8443 32 or 8443 39: Free
  ’;

read:

‘Ink cartridges (without an integrated print head) for insertion into apparatus of subheadings 8443 31, 8443 32 or 8443 39, and incorporating mechanical or electrical components; solid ink in engineered shapes for insertion into apparatus of subheadings 8443 31, 8443 32 or 8443 39: Free
  ’.

---
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10K of ATEL Cash  Distribution Fund
VII, LP, (the  "Partnership")  for the period  ended  December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
and  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Dean L. Cash,  Chief  Executive  Officer of ATEL
Financial  Services,  LLC,  general partner of the  Partnership,  hereby certify
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

Date:        3/26/2004



 /s/ Dean Cash
-----------------
Dean L. Cash
President and Chief Executive
Officer of General Partner