alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Quarterly Report of Morris      Publishing Group, LLC and Morris Publishing Finance Co. (the “Registrants”) on      Form 10-Q

| (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                    the                    Registrants |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                       |   |    |   |                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|---------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  **Date:**May                11, 2007 |   | **BY:** |   | /s/                William S. Morris IV                                       |
|                                       |   |    |   | **William                S. Morris IV**Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                  |   |    |
|                                       |   |    |   |                                                                          |
|                                       |   |    |   |                                                                          |
|  **Date:**May                11, 2007 |   | **BY:** |   | /s/                Steve K. Stone                                             |
|                                       |   |    |   | **Steve                K. Stone**Chief                Financial Officer       |
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
October 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul B. Carousso, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        |  |  |  |                                                                                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 16, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Paul B. Carousso                                                                         
|                        |  |  |  | Paul B. Carousso Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer)
66 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Huntington Ingalls $4.6 B

L3 Technologies $916.7 M

Olin Corp. $132.7 M

Weeks Marine $112.8 M

Vision Technologies Systems $84.0 M

Raytheon $71.4 M

Leidos $47.5 M

Airbus $46.3 M

Cooper Crouse-Hinds $30.8 M

Hewlett-Packard $23.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

MISSISSIPPI

#20 #3 1.7% $2,774 #17 #22 #23

$8.3 B SPENT 

IN STATE

7.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $6.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

37,846 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.7 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

37,846

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Harrison 7,716 2,265 956 2,132 13,069

Lauderdale 1,063 650 1,455 280 3,448

Warren ND 2,489 109 277

Hinds 48 422 1,344 441 2,255

Lowndes 1,433 583 91 96 2,203

Hancock 559 1,299 48 ND

Rankin ND 324 1,359 ND

Forrest 310 399 606 193 1,508

Lee 30 95 460 125 710

Tippah 659 ND 45 ND

Service: 30%

Supplies and

Equipment: 67%

Construction: 0% Research and

Development: 3%

Active Duty: 32%

Civilian: 25%

National 

Guard: 32%

Reserve: 11%

7%

79%

10%

5%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

41%

24%

34%

1%

$5.3 $5.2

$3.0

$2.2 $2.1 $2.6

$4.8

$6.6

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 67

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Lafayette

Lowndes

Madison

Scott

Warren Lauderdale

Hinds

Jackson

Harrison

Hancock

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MISSISSIPPI

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Jackson

Madison

Harrison

Lowndes

Lafayette

Hancock

Scott

Warren

Hinds

Lauderdale

(M = millions)

$4.7 B

$886.0 M

$333.3 M

$146.9 M

$137.4 M

$97.2 M

$71.4 M

$63.7 M

$37.8 M

$33.8 M

Harrison

Warren

Hancock

Lowndes

Lauderdale

Hinds

Forrest

Rankin

Jackson

Tippah

$572.6 M

$210.1 M

$148.2 M

$130.7 M

$124.3 M

$87.1 M

$68.0 M

$48.2 M

$47.7 M

$33.6 M

Tippah

Rankin

Lauderdale

Hinds

Forrest

Jackson

Harrison

Hancock

Lowndes

Warren
#### John B. SHRIVER, an Individual, Doing Business as John B. Shriver Company, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

No. 14832.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

June 12, 1953.

Martin I. Rose, New York City, for petitioner.

David P. Findley, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Ows-ley Vose, Chief, Enforcement Branch, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

On stipulation of parties leave granted to withdraw petition to review and set aside decision and order of National Labor Relations Board without prejudice to any of the rights and interests of the parties, etc.
STATE of North Carolina v. Bernice Allen WILLIAMSON.

No. 246P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

David A. Phillips, Gastonia, for Bernice Allen Williamson.

*682Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Michael K. Lands, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of May 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 36325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13124]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  Wednesday, June 22, 2022 at 10 a.m. and its 
continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on June 23, 2022.

PLACE:  1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC and virtual (this meeting 
will be a hybrid meeting).

STATUS:  This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 
30109.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

Vicktoria J. Allen,
Acting Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2022-13124 Filed 6-14-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
STATE v. Michael Lee DUFF.

No. 407P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 9, 2005.

Anne Bleyman, for Michael Lee Duff.

Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 4th day of August 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

*737"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of August 2005."
STATE of North Carolina v. Archie McCray FAIR.

No. 671P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Archie McCray Fair, Pro Se.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 31st day of December 2003 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
STATE of North Carolina v. Joseph Anthony RICHARDSON.

No. 270P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Joseph Anthony Richardson, Pro Se.

William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*656*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 20th day of May 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
Michael RANKINS v. Michael D. JOHNSON.

No. 372P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Michael Rankins, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Michael D. Johnson.

*AMENDED ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioner on the 12th day of July 2005 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Chowan County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 18th day of August 2005."
STATE v. DOELMAN

No. COA04-1492

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Pitt (03CRS65794, 03CRS65556, 03CRS65557, 03CRS65558, 03CRS65559).

Case without published opinion. No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5180 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5180

    Making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2008 for the 
Department of Justice's Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant 
                                program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

    Mr. Loebsack (for himself, Mr. Boswell, and Mr. Braley of Iowa) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
 Appropriations, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    Making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year 2008 for the 
Department of Justice's Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant 
                                program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the following sums 
are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, for fiscal year 2008:

                         DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

                       Office of Justice Programs

               state and local law enforcement assistance

    For an additional amount for ``State and Local Law Enforcement 
Assistance'' for the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant 
program, $490,000,000, to remain available until expended: Provided, 
That the amount provided under this heading is designated as an 
emergency requirement and necessary to meet emergency needs pursuant to 
section 204 of S. Con. Res. 21 (110th Congress), the concurrent 
resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2008.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. ABONZA.

No. COA04-1542.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         June 24, 2022.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on June 15, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express & Priority Mail Contract 133 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2022-72, CP2022-78.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2022-13458 Filed 6-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I,Joseph Ram, Chief Executive Officer and President of InfoSonics Corporation,certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InfoSonics Corporation;

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;

4.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: November 14, 2007 | /s/ Joseph Ram                               |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Joseph Ram, Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

----
Exhibit 21.1

              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Rofin-Sinar, Inc.
Rofin-Sinar Technologies Europe S.L.
Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH
Rofin-Baasel Japan Corp.
Rasant-Alcotec Beschichtungstechnik GmbH
CBL Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
Carl Baasel Lasertechnik GmbH & Co. KG
Rofin-Baasel, Inc.
Wegmann-Baasel Laser und elektrooptische Geraete GmbH
PMB Elektronik GmbH
Rofin-Baasel Italiana S.r.l.
Rofin-Baasel France S.A.
Rofin-Sinar UK Ltd.
Rofin-Baasel UK Ltd.
Rofin-Baasel Benelux B.V.
Rofin-Baasel Singapore PTE Ltd.
Rofin-Baasel Espana S.L.
DILAS Diodenlaser GmbH
Rofin-Baasel Taiwan Ltd.
Rofin-Baasel Korea Co., Ltd.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00153-CR

Donnell Junior Randles

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 3

of Tarrant County (1312909R)

July 23, 2015

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4921 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4921

         To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Lewatit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

  Mr. Saxton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Lewatit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEWATIT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.71 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```