alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
116 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Oshkosh Corp. $934.6 M

Fincantieri Group $636.5 M

APTIM $101.0 M

Arcline Investment Management, LP $71.0 M

National Presto Industries $70.4 M

Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance $67.2 M

General Electric $46.8 M

Konecranes, Inc. $44.5 M

Complete Mobile Dentistry, Inc. $39.7 M

Quanta Services, Inc. $35.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

WISCONSIN

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$586.6 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

16,599

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Dane 106 589 2,241 699 3,635

Milwaukee 213 363 1,211 999 2,786

Monroe 229 1,084 197 706 2,216

Juneau 0 146 724 0 870

Brown 21 33 136 576 766

Waukesha 11 26 296 127 460

Winnebago ND 45 150 231 ND

Marathon ND 20 151 178 ND

Fond du Lac ND ND 215 89 ND

La Crosse 11 12 129 103 255

Construction: 3% 

Research and 

Development: 1%

Service: 15%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 81%

Active Duty: 4%

Civilian: 17%

National Guard: 54%

Reserve: 26%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

26%

53%

4%

17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

77%

6%

16%

1%

$2.0 $2.4 $2.4 $2.6

$3.7 $3.9

$3.2

$2.7

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#33 #44 0.6% $581 #30 #25 #36 #41

$3.4 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.9% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$2.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

16,599 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$112.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 117

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Sauk

WISCONSIN FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Winnebago

Marinette

Dane

Monroe

Milwaukee

Waukesha

Rock

Outagamie

Kenosha

Sauk

(M = millions)

$941.7 M

$641.3 M

$236.8 M

$201.7 M

$194.0 M

$149.7 M

$142.6 M

$37.9 M

$31.9 M

$27.3 M

Dane

Monroe

Milwaukee

Juneau

Brown

Waukesha

Winnebago

Marinette

Buffalo

Marathon

$153.9 M

$126.7 M

$100.0 M

$32.4 M

$15.3 M

$11.0 M

$10.7 M

$8.7 M

$8.6 M

$7.9 M

Marinette

Outagamie

Winnebago

Monroe

Dane

Rock

Kenosha

Waukesha

Milwaukee

Juneau

Marathon

Monroe

Buffalo

Dane

Waukesha

Milwaukee

Brown

Winnebago

Marinette
SHEPARD v. OCWEN FEDERAL BANK, et al.

No. 476A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 1, 2005.

Mallam J. Maynard, Maria D. McIntyre, Charlotte, Chandra T. Taylor, J. Jerome Hartzell, Raleigh, for Wayne & Rosemary Shepard.

Matthew T. McKee, for Ocwen Federal Bank, et al.

Carlene McNulty, for NC Justice Center, et al.

Hazel Mack-Hilliard, Susan Gottsegen, Winston-Salem, for Legal Aid Soc. of Northwest NC.

Kenneth L. Schorr, Charlotte, for Legal Ser. of Southern Piedmont.

William J. Whalen, for Pisgah Legal Services.

Gary W. Jackson, for NC Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Seth P. Rosebrock, for Center of Responsible Lending.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 31st day of October 2005 by Defendants for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendants (Ocwen Federal Bank, et al.) shall have up to and Including the 12th day of December 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of November 2005."
STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. COA04-1506.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed November 15, 2005.

Certification Date December 5, 2005

Appeal from the Wake (02CRS88230, 02CRS88233).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
UTAH 

ηϮε

Ψρ͘ϳ^WEd/E

ηϭϳ

Ϯ͘εйK&^dd'W

ϭ͘Ϭй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

Ψϭ͕ϳϳς

PER RESIDENT 

ηϮΘ

Ψϯ͘εKEdZd

ηϮρ

ϯϮ͕ϳςεEhDZK&

#23 

Ψϭ͘ΘWZ^KEE>

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ Ϯй

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ Ϯρй

ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ϳй

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐĂŶĚ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ςρй

By Service 

Army 

17% 

Navy/Marines 

47% 

Air Force 

30% 

Other Defense 

6% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Reserve: 15% Active Duty: 14% 

National 

Guard: 22% 

Civilian: 49% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

33% 

Navy/Marines 

3% 

Air Force 

61% 

Other Defense 

4% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

EŽƌƚŚƌŽƉ'ƌƵŵŵĂŶ Ψϭ͘ς

>ϯdĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐ ΨκςϬ͘ςD

ŽĞŝŶŐ ΨϮϬϭ͘εD

DŽŽŐ ΨϭΘϬ͘ϮD

hƚĂŚ^ƚĂƚĞhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ ΨϭϮϬ͘κD

dƌŝƵŵƉŚ'ƌŽƵƉ/ŶĐ͘ ΨϭϭϬ͘κD

,ĂƌƌŝƐŽƌƉ͘ ΨεϬ͘ρD

,,/ŽƌƉŽƌĂƟŽŶ ΨϳϬ͘ϯD

:ĂĐŽďƐŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉ Ψϯϯ͘ςD

WĞůĂƚƌŽŶdĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐ ΨϮε͘ϯD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψϯ͘ε

ΨϮ͘ς

&zϭϮ

ΨϮ͘Ϯ

Ψϭ͘ς Ψϭ͘ς Ψϭ͘ς

&zϭϯ &zϭκ

Ψϭ͘ϯ Ψϭ͘ϯ

&zϭρ &zϭς &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Ψϭ͘Θ/>>/KE ϯϮ͕ϳςε

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

ŽƵŶƚLJ

ĂǀŝƐ

^Ăůƚ>ĂŬĞ

dŽŽĞůĞ

hƚĂŚ

tĞďĞƌ

tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ

ĂĐŚĞ

^ĂŶƉĞƚĞ

/ƌŽŶ

ĂƌďŽŶ

ĐƟǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

κ͕ϮϬϮ ϭϯ͕κϳϭ E

ϮϮΘ ϭ͕ϮϮε κ͕ρεϭ

Ϯκ ϭ͕ϭϭκ ϭρκ

Ϯϯ ϯϯ εΘϭ

ρϮ ϭϬϮ ϯκϮ

Ϭ ϭΘ Ϯες

E E Θϳ

Ϭ E ϭϭρ

E E ϭϭΘ

Ϭ Ϭ ϭϭς

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

ϭ͕ϯΘϭ E

Ϯ͕ϳΘϮ Θ͕ΘϯϬ

Ϭ ϭ͕ϮεϮ

ϭΘϮ ϭ͕Ϯϭε

ρϭΘ ϭ͕Ϭϭκ

ρϮ ϯςς

ϭϮϯ E

Ϭ E

Ϭ E

Ϭ ϭϭς

ϭϬς KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR UTAH 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

ŽdžůĚĞƌ

tĞďĞƌ

DŽƌŐĂŶ

^Ƶŵŵŝƚ

dŽŽĞůĞ ^Ăůƚ>ĂŬĞ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

^Ăůƚ>ĂŬĞ

ĂǀŝƐ

ĂĐŚĞ

tĞďĞƌ

^Ƶŵŵŝƚ

dŽŽĞůĞ

hƚĂŚ

ŽdžůĚĞƌ

tĂƐĂƚĐŚ

DŽƌŐĂŶ

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

$2.4 B 

ΨΘκΘ͘ϳD

ΨϭρΘ͘εD

ΨϭϮε͘ΘD

Ψϭϭϯ͘ϭD

ΨϭϭϬ͘ϯD

ΨΘε͘κD

Ψκϯ͘ΘD

$7.4 M 

Ψϭ͘ϮD

ĂǀŝƐ

^Ăůƚ>ĂŬĞ

dŽŽĞůĞ

hƚĂŚ

tĞďĞƌ

ĂĐŚĞ

tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ

ŽdžůĚĞƌ

/ƌŽŶ

^ĂŶƉĞƚĞ

Ψϭ͘ϯ

Ψϯϯρ͘ρD

ΨΘς͘ϮD

Ψϯϯ͘εD

ΨϮϳ͘ϬD

ΨϭϬ͘ϭD

$7.2 M 

Ψκ͘ςD

ΨϮ͘ρD

$2.4 M 

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

dŽŽĞůĞ ^Ăůƚ>ĂŬĞ

hƚĂŚ

ĂĐŚĞ

ŽdžůĚĞƌ

tĞďĞƌ

ĂǀŝƐ

^ĂŶƉĞƚĞ

/ƌŽŶ

tĂƐĂƚĐŚ

ĂĐŚĞ

ĂǀŝƐ

hƚĂŚ

tĂƐŚŝŶŐƚŽŶ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε ϭϬϳ
#### In the Matter of Craig Robert B., Jr., Also Known as Craig B., an Infant. St. Christopher-Ottilie, Respondent; Craig B., Sr., Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 803]

*413In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of permanent neglect, the father appeals from an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Clark, J.), dated August 16, 2004, made after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, which found that he permanently neglected the subject child, terminated his parental rights, and transferred guardianship and custody of the subject child to the petitioner St. ChristopherOttilie and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for the purpose of adoption.

Ordered that the order of fact-finding and disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

To establish permanent neglect as a basis for terminating parental rights, the petitioner was required to show that the parent “failed for a period of more than one year following the date [that the] child came into [its] care . . . substantially and continuously or repeatedly to maintain contact with or plan for the future of the child, although physically and financially able to do so, notwithstanding the agency’s diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship” (Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; *see Matter of Star Leslie*W., 63 NY2d 136, 142-143 [1984]; *Matter of Sheila G.,*61 NY2d 368, 380 [1984]). Here, it was established by clear and convincing evidence that the petitioner made diligent attempts to strengthen the relationship between the father and the subject child and that, despite these efforts, the father remained either indifferent or uncooperative to correcting the conditions that led to the child’s retention in foster care *(see Matter of Anthony Christopher G.,*18 AD3d 469 [2005]; *Matter of Luno Scott*A., 292 AD2d 602, 603 [2002]; *Matter of Alicia Shante H.,*245 AD2d 509 [1997]). In addition, the evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing demonstrated that the subject child’s best interests would be served by terminating the father’s parental rights and freeing him for adoption by his foster parents *(see Matter of Anthony Christopher G., supra; Matter of Leake & Watts Servs.,*262 AD2d 644 [1999]; *Matter of Tiwana M.,*267 AD2d 144 [1999]).

The father’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., S. Miller, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
HomeEducationCurrents

# Thermohaline Circulation

## Currents Tutorial

----

Winds drive ocean currents in the upper 100 meters of the ocean’s  surface. However, ocean currents also flow thousands of meters below  the surface. These deep-ocean currents are driven by differences in the  water’s density, which is controlled by temperature (*thermo*) and salinity (*haline*).  This process is known as thermohaline circulation.

In the Earth's polar regions ocean water gets very cold, forming sea  ice. As a consequence the surrounding seawater gets saltier, because  when sea ice forms, the salt is left behind. As the seawater gets  saltier, its density increases, and it starts to sink. Surface water is  pulled in to replace the sinking water, which in turn eventually  becomes cold and salty enough to sink. This initiates the deep-ocean  currents driving the global conveyer belt.

### Currents Lessons

              - Welcome
              - Tidal Currents 1
              - Tidal Currents 2
              Coastal Currents
              - Waves
              - Longshore Currents
              - Rip Currents
              - Upwelling
              Surface Ocean Currents
              - The Coriolis Effect
              - Surface Ocean Currents
              - Boundary Currents
              - The Ekman Spiral
              The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Thermohaline Circulation
              - The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Effects of Climate Change
              How Are Currents Measured?
              - Age of Exploration
              - What is a "knot"?
              - Shallow Water Drifter
              - Deep Ocean Drifter
              - Current Profiler
              - Shore-based Current Meters
              - How Currents Affect Our Lives?
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources
              - Subject Review

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
STATE v. KITTRELL

No. COA05-38.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from Wake (04CRS12408).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated.
Exhibit
      32.1








**CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of DAIRY FRESH FARMS INC. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Harrison,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By/s/Robert HarrisonRobert HarrisonChief
                  Executive OfficerDate:
                  September 28, 2006
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5324 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 ENTRIES OF TRUCK TIRES. 

5 (a) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION REQUIRED.— 

6 Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff Act 

7 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520), or any other provi8 sion of law, U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall, 

9 not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act— 

11 (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty each 

12 entry described in subsection (b) containing any 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5324 IH

1 merchandise which, at the time of original liquida2 tion, was merchandise eligible for duty-free treat3 ment under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

4 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.); and 

5 (2) refund any duties and interest paid on such 

6 entries. 

7 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

8 subsection (a) are the following: 

Port Code Date of Entry Entry Number 

5301 09/07/2005 669–2816633–0 

5301 09/13/2005 669–2816686–8 

5301 04/03/2006 669–2818113–1 

5301 04/11/2006 669–2818162–8 

5301 04/18/2006 669–2818213–9 

5301 05/02/2006 669–2818340–0 

5301 05/23/2006 669–2818507–4 

5301 05/30/2006 669–2818627–0 

5301 06/06/2006 669–2818626–2 

5301 06/14/2006 669–2818677–5 

5301 06/15/2006 669–2818697–3 

5301 06/20/2006 669–2818734–4 

5301 06/27/2006 669–2818808–6 

5301 07/04/2006 669–2818852–4 

5301 07/11/2006 669–2818914–2 

5301 07/19/2006 669–2818961–3 

5301 07/25/2006 669–2819019–9 

5301 08/01/2006 669–2819088–4 

5301 08/08/2006 669–2819135–3 

5301 08/15/2006 669–2819205–4 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**I, J. Chris Brewster, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cardtronics, Inc (the “registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects that financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designated such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 14, 2006       /s/ J. Chris Brewster         J. Chris Brewster    *Chief Financial Officer*
<PAGE>

                             POWER OF ATTORNEY

                  KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Christie S. Flanagan, Renee Nichols Tucei, and
Eric K. Kawamura or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the GOLDEN
STATE BANCORP INC. (the "Corporation"), Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form
10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the
undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to
the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in
connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including
this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Office
of Thrift Supervision, or other appropriate regulatory authority and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents
this 11th day of March 1999.


                                                         /s/ Ronald O. Perelman
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Ronald O. Perelman
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of Steiner Leisure Limited certifies that (1) this Annual Report of Steiner Leisure Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Leonard I. Fluxman               
| | -------------------------------------
| | Leonard I. Fluxman                   
| | President and Chief Executive Officer

March 11, 2010
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Hamilton THREADGILL.

No. 326P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Michael Hamilton Threadgill, Pro Se.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 16th day of June 2005 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Johnston County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 18th day of August 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        dec-31-1999
<CASH>                                                         1,674,372
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  6,351,011
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     724,906
<INVENTORY>                                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       0
<PP&E>                                                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               191,424,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  0
<BONDS>                                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   101,313,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 191,424,300
<SALES>                                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              39,634,771
<CGS>                                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              28,932,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               6,779,040
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             6,082,904
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               (2,159,370)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           (2,159,370)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  (2,159,370)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                          0


</TABLE>