alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LOUISIANA 

ηϯρ

$3.2 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#42 

ϭ͘ϮйK&^dd'W

Ϭ͘ςй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

ΨςϳΘ

PER RESIDENT 

ηϯΘ

Ψϭ͘ρKEdZd

PENDING 

#23 

ϯϳ͕ϳΘϳEhDZK&

PERSONNEL 

ηϮς

Ψϭ͘ϳWZ^KEE>

SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ ρй

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐ ĂŶĚ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ρϬй

By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

Air Force 

10% 

Other Defense 

9% 

ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ϯй

30% 

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ κϮй

51% 

Active Duty: 38% 

62% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

dĞdžƚƌŽŶ ΨϮϯς͘εD

'ƵůĨ/ƐůĂŶĚ&ĂďƌŝĐĂƟŽŶ/ŶĐ͘ ΨϭϮε͘ϮD

EŽǀĂ'ůŽďĂů^ƵƉƉůLJĂŶĚ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ Ψϳρ͘ϮD

KD Ψρϳ͘ΘD

,ŽƌŶďĞĐŬKīƐŚŽƌĞ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞƐ ΨρϬ͘εD

dŚŽŵĂͲ^ĞĂDĂƌŝŶĞŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŽƌƐ Ψκς͘ΘD

ŝƌĚŽŶŵĞƌŝĐĂ/ŶĐ͘ Ψκρ͘ϭD

:'/>^ Ψϯρ͘κD

'ƌĂǀŽŝƐůƵŵŝŶƵŵŽĂƚƐ ΨϮε͘ςD

^ǁŝŌƐŚŝƉƐ ΨϮΘ͘κD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψϭ͘ε

&zϭϮ

Ψϭ͘ρ Ψϭ͘ϯ Ψϭ͘ϯ Ψϭ͘Ϯ Ψϭ͘Ϯ

&zϭϯ &zϭκ &zϭρ

Ψϭ͘ϭ

ΨϬ͘Θ

&zϭς &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Ψϭ͘ϳ/>>/KE ϯϳ͕ϳΘϳ

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Reserve: 15% 

National 

Guard: 30% 

Civilian: 17% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

11% 

Air Force 

26% 

Other Defense 

1% 

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ

ϮϮ

Ϯ͕ϬϬς

Ϯ͕ρεϯ

E

ςϭϯ

Ϭ

ϯρ

E

ϭςϮ

εε

dŽƚĂů

ε͕ϯϮϯ

Θ͕Θκς

ϳ͕Θϯρ

E

ϭ͕ϯϯϮ

E

Θςς

E

E

ρϯϮ

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

WĂƌŝƐŚ ĐƟǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

sĞƌŶŽŶ ϳ͕ϳΘϬ ϭ͕ϯεϳ ϭϮκ

ŽƐƐŝĞƌ ρ͕ϭΘϯ ϭ͕κϯϬ ϮϮϳ

KƌůĞĂŶƐ ερκ ϭ͕ϳϭϭ Ϯ͕ρϳϳ

ZĂƉŝĚĞƐ E κϭε ϭ͕κεϮ

ĂƐƚĂƚŽŶZŽƵŐĞ ϭρρ ϭϬρ κρε

dĂŶŐŝƉĂŚŽĂ E ϭϭϮ ϳϳΘ

/ďĞƌǀŝůůĞ Θϳ ϯς ϳϬΘ

WůĂƋƵĞŵŝŶĞƐ Θϳ ςρϮ Ϭ

ĂůĐĂƐŝĞƵ E κϭ ϯκΘ

>ĂĨĂLJĞƩĞ κϯ κρ ϯκρ

ρκ KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 LOUISIANA I S CAL YEAR 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

tĞďƐƚĞƌ

ZĂƉŝĚĞƐ dĂŶŐŝƉĂŚŽĂ

/ďĞƌǀŝůůĞ

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

ŽƐƐŝĞƌ

ĂƐƚĂƚŽŶZŽƵŐĞ

^ƚ͘dĂŵŵĂŶLJ

KƌůĞĂŶƐ

>ĂĨŽƵƌĐŚĞ

/ďĞƌŝĂ

dĞƌƌĞďŽŶŶĞ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

KƌůĞĂŶƐ

sĞƌŶŽŶ

dĞƌƌĞďŽŶŶĞ

ŽƐƐŝĞƌ

^ƚ͘dĂŵŵĂŶLJ

>ĂĨŽƵƌĐŚĞ

:ĞīĞƌƐŽŶ

ĂƐƚĂƚŽŶZŽƵŐĞ

/ďĞƌŝĂ

^ƚ͘DĂƌLJ

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψκϯς͘εD

ΨϯϬε͘ϭD

Ψϭϳϭ͘κD

ΨϭϮϮ͘ϯD

ΨϭϬϬ͘ρD

Ψϳρ͘ςD

Ψκς͘εD

$43.2 M 

Ψϯϭ͘ϬD

ΨϯϬ͘εD

sĞƌŶŽŶ

ŽƐƐŝĞƌ

KƌůĞĂŶƐ

ZĂƉŝĚĞƐ

WůĂƋƵĞŵŝŶĞƐ

ĂƐƚĂƚŽŶZŽƵŐĞ

/ďĞƌǀŝůůĞ

dĂŶŐŝƉĂŚŽĂ

>ĂĨĂLJĞƩĞ

tĞďƐƚĞƌ

ΨρϬϯ͘ΘD

ΨκΘϯ͘ΘD

ΨϯςϮ͘ϳD

Ψςϯ͘ςD

Ψκϯ͘ϬD

Ψϯς͘ϮD

ΨϮκ͘ΘD

ΨϮκ͘ϬD

Ψϭς͘ϳD

Ψϭϭ͘ϬD

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

:ĞĨĨĞƌƐŽŶ

^ƚ͘DĂƌLJ

ŽƐƐŝĞƌ

KƌůĞĂŶƐ

ĂƐƚĂƚŽŶZŽƵŐĞ

sĞƌŶŽŶ

sĞƌŶŽŶ

WůĂƋƵĞŵŝŶĞƐ

>ĂĨĂLJĞƩĞ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε ρρ
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**INFRASOURCE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Terence R. Montgomery, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of InfraSource Services, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness ofthe registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions);

 

(a)  All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 13, 2004

 
|   | /s/ Terence R. Montgomery           |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Terence R. Montgomery               |
|   | Senior Vice President - Finance and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer             |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive OfficerRequired by Rule 13a-14(a) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(a))**

 

I, Christopher B. Begley,certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Hospira, Inc. (“Hospira”);

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of Hospira as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.  Hospira’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for Hospira, and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to Hospira, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of Hospira’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in Hospira’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during Hospira’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,Hospira’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.  Hospira’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to Hospira’s auditors and the audit and public policycommittee of Hospira’s board of directors:

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect Hospira’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in Hospira’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: May 12, 2005 |    /s/  Christopher B. Begley    |   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                    | Christopher B. Begley,  Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
112 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

WASHINGTON 

#13 #25 2.5% $1,900 #17 #7 #8 

$14.6 B SPENT IN 2.3% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $7.6 B CONTRACT 107,756 NUMBER $7.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 8% Research and

Development: 3%

Service: 27%

Supplies and

Equipment: 63%

By Service 

Army

12%

Navy/Marines

58%

Air Force

18%

Other Defense

11%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 9%

National 

Guard: 7%

Civilian: 30% Active Duty: 53%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

44%

Navy/Marines

43%

Air Force

11%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Boeing

Vigor Industrial

PacMed

Collinear Group

BP

Unifire Inc.

Skookum Educational Programs

Brice Civil Constructors Inc.

Walsh Federal, JV

Par Pacific Holdings

(M = millions, B = billions)

$3.8 B

$244.6 M

$161.7 M

$157.3 M

$127.0 M

$91.3 M

$79.9 M

$78.7 M

$78.2 M

$71.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$11.1

$9.5 $9.9

FY13 FY14 FY16

$8.6 $7.8 $7.8

FY15 FY17 FY18 FY19

$7.6

$6.0

FY20

$7.0 BILLION 107,756

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Pierce 30,534 7,398 2,986 5,455 46,373

Kitsap 4,961 19,520 100 868 25,449

Island 7,256 827 0 714 8,797

Spokane 3,497 986 1,500 726 6,709

Snohomish 765 631 313 1,256 2,965

King 442 908 1,087 139 2,576

Walla Walla ND 1,124 46 0 ND 

Yakima 98 290 464 202 1,054

Clark 54 75 160 654 943

Thurston 82 68 184 106 440
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020 113

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

WASHINGTON FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

King

Kitsap

Pierce

Snohomish

Klickitat

Spokane

Whatcom

Clark

Island

Yakima

(M = millions, B = billions)

$4.5 B

$802.0 M

$726.8 M

$434.6 M 

$293.0 M

$246.1 M

$141.3 M

$135.3 M

$101.9 M

$69.9 M

Pierce

Kitsap

Island

Spokane

King

Snohomish

Walla Walla

Yakima

Clark

Thurston

$2.9 B

$2.0 B

$572.5 M

$335.4 M

$155.6 M

$154.4 M

$40.8 M

$39.1 M

$33.1 M

$22.3 M

Whatcom

Snohomish

Spokane Kitsap King

Pierce

Clark Klickitat

Island

Yakima

Snohomish

Spokane Kitsap King

Pierce

Island

Clark

Yakima

Thurston

Walla Walla
# Official Journal L 107/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 107 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5922 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 107

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5922 April 2016

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2016 on a European network of employment services (EURES), workers' access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 492/2011 and (EU) No 1296/2013 (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2016/589 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 April 2016 on a European network of employment services (EURES), workers' access to mobility services and the further integration of labour markets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 492/2011 and (EU) No 1296/2013 (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EX-4.1

 
  
        
 
 MB FINANCIAL, INC.
  
 ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
  
 MB Financial, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Corporation”), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:

 

FIRST
: 
The charter of the Corporation (the “Charter”) is hereby amended by deleting therefrom in its entirety Article 9 and
inserting in lieu thereof a new Article 9 to read as follows: 
 “ARTICLE 9.  Business Combination Act and Appraisal Rights.

A.    Maryland Business Combination Act. 
Notwithstanding any contrary provision of law, the provisions of Sections 3-601 through 3-604 of the MGCL, as now and hereafter in
force, shall not apply to any “business combination” (as defined in Section 3-601(e) of the MGCL, as now and hereafter in force), of the Corporation.

 

B.    Appraisal Rights.  Holders of shares of stock of the Corporation shall not be entitled to exercise any rights of an objecting stockholder provided for under Title 3, Subtitle
2 of the MGCL or any successor statute.”
  
 SECOND:  There has been no increase in the authorized stock
of the Corporation effected by the amendment to the Charter as set forth above.
  

THIRD
:  The amendment to the Charter as set forth above has been duly advised by the Board of Directors of the Corporation and approved by the
stockholders of the Corporation entitled to vote thereon as required by law.
  
 FOURTH:  The undersigned
acknowledges these Articles of Amendment to be the corporate act of the Corporation and, as to all matters or facts required to be verified under oath, the undersigned acknowledges that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, information
and belief, these matters and facts are true in all material respects and that this statement is made under the penalties of perjury.

 

 [SIGNATURE PAGE
FOLLOWS]
      
   

 
 


     
   

 
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles of Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf by its Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and attested by its Executive Vice President, Corporate Secretary and
Chief Legal Officer on this 18th day of July 2019.

 
 
	 ATTEST:
 	  
 	 MB FINANCIAL, INC.
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 
	  
 	  
 	  
 
	 /s/ Susan B. Zaunbrecher
 	  
 	 By:  /s/ Tayfun Tuzun
 
	 Name:   Susan
B. Zaunbrecher
 	  
 	 Name:  Tayfun
Tuzun
 
	 Title:    
Executive Vice President,
 	  
 	 Title:    Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer
 
	 Corporate Secretary and Chief Legal
Officer
 	  
 	 and
Treasurer
STATE v. SINGLETARY

No. COA04-1700.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Forsyth (01CRS54685).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Thefollowing certification accompanies the issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form10-QSB, for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, and is not filed, asprovided in Release 33-8212, 34-47551.

Inconnection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Treaty Oak Bancorp, Inc. (“TreatyOak”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Jeffrey L. Nash, Chief Financial Officer of Treaty Oak, hereby certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Treaty Oak.

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Treaty Oak and will be retained by Treaty Oak and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Dated: May 15, 2007 |                    |
|---------------------|-------------------------|
|                |                    |
|                |                    |
|                | /s/ Coralie S. Pledger  |   |
|                | Coralie S. Pledger      |
|                | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
WHITT v. Harris TEETER.

No. 416A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 22, 2005.

Lucretia D. Guia, Winston-Salem, for Harris Teeter, Inc.

*166Harold L. Kennedy, III, Harvey L. Kennedy, Annie Brown Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for Wendy Whitt.

Julianna C. Theall, Greensboro, for Shultz.

J. Michael McGuinness, Elizabethtown, Grady K. Dukes, McDonough, GA, Suzanne Reynolds, Professor of Law, Charles E. Daye, for Asso. of Women Attorneys, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of February 2005 by N.C. Association of Women Attorneys, et al for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of February 2005."
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.1


Exhibit A
Amendment No. 6 to the
    Pfizer Supplemental Savings Plan (the “PSSP”)
(Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2016)


*     *     *




(New material underlined; deletions crossed out)






		
	1.
	New Appendix H is added to read as follows:


APPENDIX H
SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO EMPLOYEES TRANSFERRED TO EMPLOYMENT WITH 
GLAXOSMITHKLINE CONSUMER HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LIMITED.


Effective as of the Closing Date (“Closing Date”) as defined in the Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Pfizer Inc., GlaxoSmithKline PLC (“GSK”) and GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings Limited Dated as of December 19, 2018 (the “Pfizer-GSK Agreement”), this Appendix H sets out the additional provisions that apply to those certain employees of the Company (the “Transferred GSK Employees”) whose employment is transferred to GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Holdings Limited as of the Closing Date pursuant to the terms of the Pfizer-GSK Agreement:




		
	1.
	As of the Closing Date, Transferred GSK Employees are no longer eligible to participate in the Plan. 




		
	2.
	For purposes of any Matching Contribution paid with respect to the 2019 plan year, the Closing Date for each such Transferred GSK Employee shall be considered to have occurred on the last day of the applicable quarter of 2019.




		
	3.
	For purposes of the Retirement Savings Contribution paid with respect to the 2019 plan year, the Closing Date for each such Transferred GSK Employee shall be considered to have occurred on the last day of 2019. 




		
	4.
	Effective as of the Closing Date, any unvested Retirement Savings Contributions in the Accounts of Transferred GSK Employees shall be vested. 




GSK Amendment to 2016 PSSP
Exhibit 21.1

             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.




Rofin-Sinar, Inc.
Rofin-Sinar Technologies Europe S.L.
Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH
Rofin-Sinar France S.A.
Rofin-Sinar Italiana S.r.l.
Rofin-Marubeni Laser Corporation
Rasant-Alcotec Beschichtungstechnik GmbH
Carl Baasel Lasertechnik GmbH
PMB Elektronic GmbH
Rofin-Baasel, Inc.
Wegmann-Baasel Laser und elektrooptische Gerate GmbH
Rofin Baasel Benelux B.V.
Baasel Lasertech UK Ltd.
Baasel Lasertech Italia S.r.L.
Rofin-Baasel Espana S.A.
Baasel Lasertech France S.A.R.L.
Rofin-Baasel Singapore PTE Ltd.
DILAS Diodenlaser GmbH
Rofin-Sinar U.K., Ltd.






























<PAGE>
STATE v. William Beach SMITH.

No. 346A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 8, 2005.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Southern Pines, Joseph Blount Cheshire, V, Raleigh, for William Beach Smith.

C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of August 2005 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and Including the 9th day of August 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of August 2005."
COLORADO 

ηϭϳ

ΨϭϬ͘ς^WEd/E

ηϮϬ

Ϯ͘ςйK&^dd'W

ϭ͘εй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

Ψϭ͕Θϯρ

PER RESIDENT 

ηϭΘ

Ψϳ͘ϬKEdZd

ηϭϮ

ςϭ͕κςϳEhDZK&

ηϭϬ

Ψϯ͘ςWZ^KEE>

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐ ĂŶĚ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ ϳй

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ϭςй

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ ρςй

By Service 

Army 

17% 

Navy/Marines 

4% 

Air Force 

Other Defense 

18% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Reserve: 14% 

National 

'ƵĂƌĚ͗εй

Civilian: 19% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

4% 

Air Force 

32% 

Other Defense 

2% 

ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ

ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗Ϯϭй

Top Defense Contractors 

hŶŝƚĞĚ>ĂƵŶĐŚůůŝĂŶĐĞ

>ŽĐŬŚĞĞĚDĂƌƟŶ

ZĂLJƚŚĞŽŶ

:ĂĐŽďƐŶŐŝŶĞĞƌŝŶŐ'ƌŽƵƉ

ĞĐŚƚĞů'ƌŽƵƉ

WĞƌƐƉĞĐƚĂ

,ĂƌƌŝƐŽƌƉ͘

ĂůůŽƌƉ͘

:͘͘ƵŶŶŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ

WĂƌƐŽŶƐŽƌƉ͘

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψϳ͘Ϭ Ψς͘ς

&zϭϮ

Ψς͘Ϭ Ψρ͘Θ Ψς͘ϭ

Ψρ͘ϭ

&zϭϯ &zϭκ

Ψκ͘Θ Ψκ͘ϯ

&zϭρ &zϭς &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Ψϯ͘ς/>>/KE ςϭ͕κςϳ

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψϭ͘κ

ΨΘϯΘ͘ϭD

ΨρκϬ͘ρD

ΨϯκϬ͘ΘD

ΨϯϭϬ͘ΘD

ΨϮϳϭ͘ϮD

ΨϭεϮ͘ϭD

ΨϭΘΘ͘ΘD

ΨϭρΘ͘ϬD

ΨϭϬϳ͘ςD

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

κ͕κϳς κς͕ΘϬϳ

ϭ͕ΘϬϭ Θ͕ϯεε

ρςϯ ϭ͕ςϳρ

εϬϬ E

ϭρε E

κκϯ ϳςε

Ϭ ρρΘ

E E

E E

Ϭ E

ŽƵŶƚLJ

ůWĂƐŽ

ƌĂƉĂŚŽĞ

ĞŶǀĞƌ

ĚĂŵƐ

tĞůĚ

:ĞīĞƌƐŽŶ

WƵĞďůŽ

ŽƵůĚĞƌ

>ĂƌŝŵĞƌ

DŽŶƚƌŽƐĞ

ĐƚŝǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

ϯϮ͕ρκρ Θ͕ϳεκ εεϮ

Ϯ͕ςϭϭ ϭ͕ρϭϭ Ϯ͕κϳς

ϯρκ Ϯϳϳ κΘϭ

E ςΘ ϯϮκ

E ες ςϭρ

ςϮ Ϯςκ Ϭ

ϭϳ κϮκ ϭϭϳ

ΘϮ ρε ςϮ

ϮϬ ϭϯ ϭϬϭ

E E ϭϮϯ

61% 

Active Duty: 58% 

62% 

ϮΘ KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
COLORADO FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

tĞůĚ

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

>ĂƌŝŵĞƌ

ĚĂŵƐ

:ĞĨĨĞƌƐŽŶ ĞŶǀĞƌ

ƌĂƉĂŚŽĞ

ŽƵŐůĂƐ

ůWĂƐŽ

WƵĞďůŽ

ŽƵůĚĞƌ

ƌŽŽŵĨŝĞůĚ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ůWĂƐŽ

ƌĂƉĂŚŽĞ

ŽƵŐůĂƐ

WƵĞďůŽ

>ĂƌŝŵĞƌ

ŽƵůĚĞƌ

:ĞīĞƌƐŽŶ

ĞŶǀĞƌ

ĚĂŵƐ

ƌŽŽŵĮĞůĚ

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

$2.7 B 

$2.2 B 

ΨρκϮ͘ϬD

$342.2 M 

Ψϯϭρ͘εD

ΨϯϬε͘ϬD

ΨϮϭΘ͘ςD

Ψεε͘ςD

ΨεΘ͘ρD

ΨΘκ͘ϭD

ůWĂƐŽ

ƌĂƉĂŚŽĞ

ĞŶǀĞƌ

ĚĂŵƐ

:ĞīĞƌƐŽŶ

WƵĞďůŽ

tĞůĚ

ŽƵůĚĞƌ

>ĂƌŝŵĞƌ

ŽƵŐůĂƐ

ΨϮ͘ε

ΨκϮϳ͘ρD

Ψϳρ͘κD

Ψϯε͘ϯD

$37.4 M 

Ψϯκ͘ρD

$22.4 M 

Ψϭϭ͘ΘD

Ψρ͘ϯD

Ψκ͘ϭD

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

>ĂƌŝŵĞƌ

ŽƵůĚĞƌ

ĚĂŵƐ

:ĞĨĨĞƌƐŽŶ ĞŶǀĞƌ

ƌĂƉĂŚŽĞ

ŽƵŐůĂƐ

ůWĂƐŽ

WƵĞďůŽ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε Ϯε
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher RASCOE.

No. 286P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Lemuel W. Hinton, for Christopher Rascoe.

Anne G. Kirby, Assistant Attorney General, Valerie M. Asbell, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 27th day of May 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."