alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00317-CR

No. 10-14-00318-CR

JESSE WAYLON WALKER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 82nd District Court

Falls County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 9387 and 9408

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Jesse Waylon Walker appeals pro se from two plea-bargained 

judgments of conviction. The trial court’s certification of defendant’s right of appeal in 

each case states that the defendant waived the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

25.2(d). The judgments in each case reflect a guilty plea, and in his notices of appeal,

Walker admits that he pleaded guilty under a plea bargain.
Walker v. State Page 2

In his notices, Walker asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel 

and that he pleaded guilty “under duress by counsel,” but those are insufficient 

grounds for continuing these direct appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2); Pena v. State,

323 S.W.3d 522, 525-26 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2010, no pet.); Webb v. State, 244 

S.W.3d 543, 547 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2007, no pet.).

Furthermore, sentence was imposed in each case on July 24, 2014, and his notices 

of appeal were filed on October 10, 2014. Walker’s notices of appeal are untimely, and 

we have no jurisdiction of an untimely appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1) (requiring 

the filing of notice of appeal within 30 days of sentence being imposed); Olivo v. State, 

918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (no appellate jurisdiction where notice of 

appeal is untimely).

For the above reasons, these appeals are dismissed.

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeals dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed October 23, 2014

Do not publish

[CRPM]
Walker v. State Page 3
# L_2016133EN.01000801.xml

| 24.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 133/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 133/8

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2016/814

of 13 May 2016

appointing an alternate member, proposed by the Republic of Austria, of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Austrian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Elisabeth VITOUCH, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Ms Elisabeth VITOUCH,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Mag. Muna DUZDAR, Abgeordnete zum Wiener Landtag und Mitglied des Gemeinderats der Stadt Wien. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mag. Muna DUZDAR, Abgeordnete zum Wiener Landtag und Mitglied des Gemeinderats der Stadt Wien.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 13 May 2016.

For the Council

The President

E.M.J. PLOUMEN

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 The Honorable Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge for the **

Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

No. 09-30261

D.C. No. 1:07-cr-00104-MRH

 v. MEMORANDUM*

SANTIAGO VALDEZ,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Michael R. Hogan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 11, 2011

Seattle, Washington

Before: GRABER and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and BENITEZ, District Judge. **

Santiago Valdez was convicted of failing to register as a sex offender in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250, upon traveling from Indiana to Montana in June

2007. The Supreme Court has held that § 2250 does not apply to offenders whose

interstate travel occurred prior to the effective date of SORNA. Carr v. United

FILED

JUN 02 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

States, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S. Ct. 2229, 2232–33 (2010). United States v. Valverde,

628 F.3d 1159, 1169 (9th Cir. 2010), held that SORNA’s registration requirements

became effective on August 1, 2008 for persons convicted of sex offenses prior to

the statute’s enactment. Valdez falls into this category because he was convicted

of rape in Indiana in 1993. 

Valdez’s interstate travel as an unregistered sex offender took place in 2007. 

Because we are bound by our Valverde decision concluding that SORNA

registration requirements were not in effect during 2007, we reverse his conviction. 

Carr, 130 S. Ct. at 2233.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer

In connection
with the Annual Report of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Günther Braun, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:     November
28, 2008

| |                          | 
| | ------------------------ | 
| | /s/ Günther
 Braun       | 
| |                          | 
| | Günther
 Braun           | 
| | Chief
 Executive Officer | 

---
<PAGE>

                                                               EXHIBIT NO. 23.1

              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

  We have issued our report dated September 22, 1999, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report
of ProsoftTraining.com on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 1999. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of ProsoftTraining.com on Form S-3 (File
No. 333-35249) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-19477).

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas
October 27, 1999
Exhibit 32.1





Certification by the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as


Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Gal Trifon, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MediaMind Technologies Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gal Trifon


Gal Trifon


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)


May 16, 2011





This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
STATE v. Levar Jamel ALLEN.

No. 485PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 20, 2004.

Richard Jester, for Allen.

Michael K. Lands, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of October 2004 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 24th day of November 2004 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 20th day of October 2004."
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 126 (Friday, July 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 39520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than July 15, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (William Spaniel, Senior 
Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-
1521. Comments can also be sent electronically to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98dbf7f5f5fdf6ecebb6f9e8e8f4f1fbf9ecf1f7f6ebd8e8f0f1f4b6feeafab6f7eaff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2764484a4a42495354094657574b4e4446534e48495467574f4e4b0941554509485540">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Patriot Financial Partners, IV, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners 
GP IV, L.P., Patriot Financial Partners GP IV, LLC., Patriot Financial 
Partners Parallel IV L.P., Patriot Financial Advisors, L.P., Patriot 
Financial Advisors LLC, W. Kirk Wycoff, James J. Lynch and James F. 
Deutsch, all of Radnor, Pennsylvania; to acquire voting shares of 
Avidbank Holdings, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares 
of Avidbank, both of San Jose, California.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-14070 Filed 6-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Travelers Series Fund Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial
statements
of the AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio of Travelers
Series
Fund Inc. (the "Fund") for the year ended October 31, 1997,
we
considered its internal control, including control
activities for
safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing
procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the
financial statements and to comply with the requirements of
Form
N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing
and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this
responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess
the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external
purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally
accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the
safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors
or
irregularities may occur and not be detected.  Also,
projection
of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is
subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the
design and
operation may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not
necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the
American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material
weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or
more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a
relatively
low level the risk that errors or irregularities in amounts
that
would be material in relation to the financial statements
being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period
by
employees in the normal course of performing their assigned
functions.  However, we noted no matters involving the
internal
control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding
securities that we consider to be material weaknesses as
defined
above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use
of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.




December 18, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5168 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  2d Session
                                H. R. 5168

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 2, 2008

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, as the ``Cody Grater 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CODY GRATER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Cody Grater Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cody 
Grater Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives April 1, 2008.

            Attest:

                                            LORRAINE C. MILLER,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
STATE v. AVERY.

No. COA05-232.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Anthony J. Orlando
    
    /s/ Craig D. AboltAnthony J. Orlando
    
    Craig D. AboltChief Executive Officer and President
    
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 4, 2006
    
    May 4, 2006
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference into theregistration statement of BIO-key International, Inc., on Form S-8(file no. 333-137414), of our report dated March 26, 2008 relating tothe financial statements which appear in this Form 10-KSB for the yearended December 31, 2007.

 
| /s/ Carlin, Charron & Rosen, LLP. |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                       |   |   |
| Westborough, MA                            |   |   |
| March 26, 2008                        |   |   |

 

 

----
# L_2016155EN.01000701.xml

| 14.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 155/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 155/7

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/929

of 1 June 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Gall del Penedès (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Gall del Penedès’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Gall del Penedès’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Gall del Penedès’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Gall del Penedès’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Gall del Penedès’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 June 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 58, 13.2.2016, p. 42.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of ZHONGPIN INC. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), Feng Wang, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:    
      November 9, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Feng WangFeng
      WangChief
      Financial Officer




This
certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.