alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOcean Facts

# What is a pocosin? 

## A pocosin is a wetland bog with sandy peat soil and woody shrubs throughout.

Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge, North Carolina.

Pocosins are generally found along the Atlantic coastal plain of the United States, from southern Virginia to northern Florida. These areas typically occur in broad, low-lying shallow basins that do not drain naturally. Pocosins are formed by the accumulation of organic matter, resembling black muck, which builds up over thousands of years. This accumulation of material causes the soil to be highly acidic and nutrient-deficient. 

At one time, pocosins were prominent ecosystems in the southeastern United States, but they disappeared rapidly due to their perceived low value for the environment and high value for land development. In reality, restoring healthy pocosin wetlands provides important benefits to terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, as well as human communities: They provide wildlife habitat, lessen the frequency and severity of wildfires, sequester carbon, nitrogen, and mercury (known as a carbon sink), protect the water quality of estuaries, and control flooding in low-elevation coastal areas. Pocosin restoration also plays a key role in the adaption of ecosystems to sea level rise by preventing soil loss and promoting soil formation.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - What is a wetland?
          - Profile of Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service)

Did you know?

The word pocosin comes from an Eastern Algonquian word meaning "swamp-on-a-hill." A more accurate description of a pocosin, however, would be a "raised bog." The city of Poquoson, Virginia, located on the state's coastal plain in the Hampton Roads metropolitan area, derives its name from this geographic feature.   

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
# L_2016180EN.01005801.xml

| 6.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 180/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 180/58

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1078 of 4 July 2016 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 179 of 5 July 2016
  )

On page 30, the Annex should read as follows:

‘ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | MA | 135,3 |
| ZZ | 135,3 |
| 0709 93 10 | TR | 135,3 |
| ZZ | 135,3 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 179,2 |
| BO | 231,1 |
| CL | 209,5 |
| MA | 174,9 |
| UY | 197,4 |
| ZA | 181,9 |
| ZZ | 195,7 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 124,0 |
| BR | 102,5 |
| CL | 133,8 |
| CN | 133,6 |
| NZ | 139,5 |
| US | 149,7 |
| UY | 67,7 |
| ZA | 111,9 |
| ZZ | 120,3 |
| 0808 30 90 | AR | 116,2 |
| CL | 129,9 |
| ZA | 115,0 |
| ZZ | 120,4 |
| 0809 10 00 | TR | 229,0 |
| ZZ | 229,0 |
| 0809 29 00 | TR | 353,5 |
| ZZ | 353,5 |
| 0809 30 10 , 0809 30 90 | TR | 126,8 |
| ZZ | 126,8 |
| 0809 40 05 | TR | 160,5 |
| ZZ | 160,5 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

MA

135,3

ZZ

135,3

0709 93 10

TR

135,3

ZZ

135,3

0805 50 10

AR

179,2

BO

231,1

CL

209,5

MA

174,9

UY

197,4

ZA

181,9

ZZ

195,7

0808 10 80

AR

124,0

BR

102,5

CL

133,8

CN

133,6

NZ

139,5

US

149,7

UY

67,7

ZA

111,9

ZZ

120,3

0808 30 90

AR

116,2

CL

129,9

ZA

115,0

ZZ

120,4

0809 10 00

TR

229,0

ZZ

229,0

0809 29 00

TR

353,5

ZZ

353,5

0809 30 10 , 0809 30 90

TR

126,8

ZZ

126,8

0809 40 05

TR

160,5

ZZ

160,5

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EU) No 1106/2012 of 27 November 2012 implementing Regulation (EC) No 471/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community statistics relating to external trade with non-member countries, as regards the update of the nomenclature of countries and territories (OJ L 328, 28.11.2012, p. 7). Code “ZZ” stands for “of other origin”.’

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

          - [RTID 0648-XC144]

# AGENCY:

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

# ACTION:

Notice; public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Ecosystems and Ocean Planning (EOP) Committee and Advisory Panel will hold a joint public meeting.

# DATES:

                        The meeting will be held on Thursday, July 21, 2022, from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. For agenda details, see                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                        .                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information will be posted to the Council's calendar prior to the meeting at                         *www.mafmc.org.*

*Council address:*                         Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331;                         *www.mafmc.org.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 526-5255.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's EOP Committee and Advisory Panel will meet together, via webinar on Thursday, July 21, 2022, from 10 a.m. until 12 p.m. The purpose of this meeting is for the EOP Committee and its Advisors to develop comments for Council consideration related to the NOAA proposal to designate the Hudson Canyon as a National Marine Sanctuary.

## Special Accommodations

The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids should be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251 at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

Dated: June 29, 2022.

Tracey L. Thompson,

Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.

[FR Doc. 2022-14258 Filed 7-1-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
WARREN v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.

No. COA04-1265

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed August 16, 2005

Certification Date September 6, 2005

Appeal from Catawba (03CVS3826).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Leon SPELLMAN.

No. 49P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Stephen D. Kiess, Greenville, for Kenneth Leon Spellman.

Robert M. Curran, Assistant Attorney General, Howard S. Boney, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Defendant on the 20th day of January 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of January 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
bbsi-ex103_277.htm





 

 
 
EXHIBIT 10.3

BARRETT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

As of July 1, 2019, compensation arrangements for non-employee directors of Barrett Business Services, Inc. (the "Company"), continue to include an annual retainer of $60,000 ($100,000 for the Chairman of the Board) payable in cash in monthly installments.  Committee chairs receive an annual cash retainer, payable in monthly installments, as follows:  chair of Audit and Compliance Committee, $15,000; chair of Compensation Committee, $10,000; chair of Risk Management Committee, $10,000; and chair of Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, $7,500.  Committee members receive an annual cash retainer, payable in monthly installments, as follows:  Audit and Compliance Committee, $7,500; Compensation Committee, $5,000; Risk Management Committee, $5,000; and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, $3,750.

In addition, each non-employee director as of July 1, 2019, received an award of restricted stock units ("RSUs") under the Company's 2015 Stock Incentive Plan.  The RSU awards had a grant date fair value of approximately $62,500 (based on the closing sale price of BBSI common stock on July 1, 2019, of $80.69).  The 2019 RSU awards will vest in full on July 1, 2020.

-1-
STATE of North Carolina v. Telly S. COLEMAN.

No. 184P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Telly S. Coleman, Pro Se.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th day of April 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5062 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5062

         To suspend temporarily the duty on lambda-cyhalothrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2008

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To suspend temporarily the duty on lambda-cyhalothrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAMBDA-CYHALOTHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00      1 alpha(S*), 3      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         alpha(Z)-(+)-                                                      31/2011
                         cyano(3-
                         phenoxphenyl)meth
                         yl3-(2-chloro-
                         3,3,3-trifluoro-1-
                         propenyl)-2,2-
                         dimenthylcylcopro
                         panecarboxylate
                         (Lambda-
                         cyhalothrin) (CAS
                         No. 91465-08-6)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2926.90.30)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony E. WILKINS.

No. 169P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 10, 2005.

Anthony E. Wilkins, Pro Se.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Mitchell D. Norton, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 21st day of March 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Beaufort County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
# L_2016183DE.01007201.xml

| 8.7.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 183/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 183/72

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2016/592 der Kommission vom 1. März 2016 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 648/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates durch technische Regulierungsstandards für die Clearingpflicht

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 103 vom 19. April 2016
  )

Seite 10, Artikel 4 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b:

Anstatt:

„6 Monate bei vor dem 9. Oktober 2016 geschlossenen oder verlängerten Kontrakten, die den im Anhang in der Tabelle aufgeführten Kategorien angehören“

muss es heißen:

„6 Monate bei ab dem 9. Oktober 2016 geschlossenen oder verlängerten Kontrakten, die den im Anhang in der Tabelle aufgeführten Kategorien angehören“.

Seite 10, Artikel 4 Absatz 2 Buchstabe b:

Anstatt:

„6 Monate bei vor dem 9. Oktober 2016 geschlossenen oder verlängerten Kontrakten, die den im Anhang in der Tabelle aufgeführten Kategorien angehören“

muss es heißen:

„6 Monate bei ab dem 9. Oktober 2016 geschlossenen oder verlängerten Kontrakten, die den im Anhang in der Tabelle aufgeführten Kategorien angehören“.

---
CITY OF BURLINGTON, a Municipal Corporation v. BONEY PUBLISHERS, INC., d/b/a The Alamance News.

No. 518PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 5, 2005.

On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of *834the Court of Appeals, 166 N.C.App. 186, 600 S.E.2d 872 (2004), reversing an order entered by Judge James C. Spencer, Jr. on 20 November 2002 in Superior Court, Alamance County. Heard in the Supreme Court 19 April 2005.

Thomas, Ferguson & Mullins, L.L.P., by Jay H. Ferguson, and Robert M. Ward, City Attorney, Durham, NC, for plaintiff-appellant.

Everett, Gaskins, Hancock & Stevens, L.L.P., by Hugh Stevens and C. Amanda Martin, Raleigh, NC, for defendant-appellee.

Andrew L. Romanet, Jr., General Counsel, and Gregory F. Schwitzgebel, III, Senior Assistant General Counsel, Raleigh, NC, for amicus curiae North Carolina League of Municipalities.

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, L.L.P., by Charles F. Marshall, Raleigh, NC, for amici curiae North Carolina Press Association and North Carolina Association of Broadcasters.

Ellis & Winters, L.L.P., by Julia F. Youngman, for amici curiae American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina Legal Foundation, and Hunter, Higgins, Miles, Elam & Benjamin, P.L.L.C., by Robert N. Hunter, Jr., Raleigh, NC, for amici curiae John Locke Foundation.

PER CURIAM.

DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
94 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

$10.1 $10.2 $10.5 $10.8

FY13 FY14 FY15

$9.3

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

PENNSYLVANIA 

#9 #26 3.0% $1,391 #9 #16 #15

$17.8 B SPENT IN 2.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $14.8 B CONTRACT 57,332 NUMBER OF $3.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 6%

Service: 21%

Supplies and

Equipment: 72%

By Service 

Army

21%

Navy/Marines

42%

Air Force

6%

Other Defense

31%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 4%

Reserve: 19%

Civilian: 46%

National 

Guard: 31%

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Allocations, By Service 

Army

54%

Navy/Marines

19%

Air Force

12%

Other Defense

15%

Top Defense Contractors 

AmerisourceBergen

BAE Systems

Fluor Corp.

Bechtel Group

Boeing

Highmark Inc.

Ultra Electronics Holdings

Lockheed Martin

Leonardo SpA

Pennsylvania State University

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.1 B

$2.1 B

$1.7 B

$1.3 B

$626.4 M

$429.1 M

$353.1 M

$278.4 M

$256.8 M

$196.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$15.0 $14.8

$12.5

$3.0 BILLION 57,332

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

County

Philadelphia

Allegheny

Cumberland

Lebanon

York

Monroe

Montgomery

Franklin

Dauphin

Cambria

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

374 8,427 1,380

340 1,511 1,396

608 4,250 214

ND 962 3,789

274 3,198 73

29 3,005 106

51 341 1,679

ND 2,102 160

69 301 1,863

17 207 757

Reserve

81 

2,943

431

173

429

106

614

344

180

504

Total

10,262

6,190

5,503

ND 

3,974

3,246

2,685

ND 

2,413

1,485
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020 95

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

PENNSYLVANIA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

Allegheny

Chester

York

Delaware

Philadelphia

Montgomery

Bucks

Franklin

Dauphin

Cambria

(M = millions)

$3.4 B 

$2.4 B

$2.2 B

$882.8 M

$815.2 M

$580.0 M

$544.0 M

$528.7 M

$476.0 M

$470.3 M

Philadelphia

Cumberland

York

Allegheny

Monroe

Lebanon

Franklin

Montgomery

Dauphin

Butler

$840.6 M

$427.5 M

$280.5 M

$250.8 M

$219.0 M

$199.5 M

$165.3 M

$86.8 M 

$76.7 M

$65.2 M

Cambria

Allegheny

Franklin York

Bucks

Montgomery

Philadelphia

Delaware

Dauphin

Chester

Allegheny

Franklin York

Montgomery

Dauphin Butler

Cumberland

Lebanon

Monroe

Philadelphia
IN RE C.P.D.

No. COA04-966

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Onslow (02J412, 02J413, 02J414)

Case reported without published opinion Affirmed.
REYNOLDS v. REYNOLDS.

COA03-1034.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 3, 2004.

Certification Date August 23, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
# C_2018302EN.01000202.xml

| 28.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.9013 — Amey Group/CAL/CAHPL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2018/C 302/04)

On 20 August 2018, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9013. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32018M9013. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
106 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Northrop Grumman $2.2 B

L3Harris Technologies $224.5 M

Advantaged Solutions $156.2 M

Utah State University $142.4 M

Boeing $108.3 M

NH1 JV $91.5 M

Sinclair Oil Corp. $69.1 M

Triumph Group, Inc. $47.1 M

M. A. Mortenson Companies, Inc. $37.5 M

Kekolu-Rio Vista JV, LLC $28.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

UTAH

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.9 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

31,843

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Davis 4,133 13,356 ND 1,287 ND

Salt Lake 224 1,194 4,628 2,392 8,438

Tooele 24 1,143 146 0 1,313

Utah 39 45 965 146 1,195

Weber 27 133 281 416 857

Washington 15 18 300 51 384

Cache 14 ND 87 74 ND

Box Elder ND 47 97 0 ND

Sanpete 0 ND 126 0 ND

Iron ND ND 97 0 ND

Construction: 3%

Research and

Development: 54%

Service: 31%

Supplies and

Equipment: 12%

Active Duty: 14%

Civilian: 50%

National 

Guard: 22%

Reserve: 14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

11%

3%

77%

9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

33%

2%

61%

4%

$1.1 $1.0 $1.3 $1.5 $1.8 $1.8

$2.9

$4.1

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#27 #16 1.1% $1,801 #24 #30 #25 #24

$6.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.5% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$4.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

31,843 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$85.0 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 107

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 UTAH

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, (M=millions) (M=millions) B = billions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Weber

Davis

Salt Lake

Cache

Tooele

Utah

Summit

Box Elder

Iron

Washington

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.1 B

$1.1 B

$425.1 M

$156.3 M

$113.8 M

$63.6 M

$52.1 M

$23.9 M

$7.7 M

$3.2 M

Davis

Salt Lake

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Washington

Box Elder

Cache

Iron

Sanpete

$1.4 B

$334.4 M

$93.3 M

$37.4 M

$26.4 M

$8.7 M

$5.9 M

$5.7 M

$2.6 M

$2.3 M

Cache

Box Elder Weber

Summit Davis

Tooele

Utah

Salt Lake

Iron

Washington

Davis

Salt Lake

Cache

Box Elder

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Iron

Washington

Sanpete
MORTON v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF CORRECTION

No. COA04-1262

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #TA-17130).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.