alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2



CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Arco Platform Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2018 (the “Report”), I, David Peixoto dos Santos, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



April  17, 2019



|/s/ David Peixoto dos Santos
|----------------------------
|David Peixoto dos Santos    
|Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 13.1

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Stock Data

Cox
Radios Class A common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange, ticker symbol: CXR. Daily newspaper stock table listing: Cox Rad. As of January 31, 2007, there were 110 shareholders of record of Cox Radios Class A
common stock and one shareholder of record of Cox Radios Class B common stock, Cox Broadcasting, Inc. There is no established trading market for Cox Radios Class B common stock. There have been no stock or cash dividends paid on any of
Cox Radios equity securities. Cox Radio does not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Quarterly Market Information

Class A Common Stock



|               |  |      |       |     |   |      
|-------------- |  | ---- | ----- | --- | - | -----
|2006           |  | High |       | Low
|First Quarter  |  | $    | 14.34 |     | $ | 13.07
|Second Quarter |  |      | 15.57 |     |   | 12.69
|Third Quarter  |  |      | 16.15 |     |   | 14.03
|Fourth Quarter |  |      | 17.41 |     |   | 15.21
|               |  |     
|2005           |  | High |       | Low
|First Quarter  |  | $    | 17.00 |     | $ | 15.03
|Second Quarter |  |      | 17.35 |     |   | 15.29
|Third Quarter  |  |      | 16.34 |     |   | 14.64
|Fourth Quarter |  |      | 15.35 |     |   | 14.00

Transfer Agent and Registrar

American Stock Transfer & Trust Company

6201 15thAvenue

Brooklyn, NY 11219

1 866 668 6550
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5238 

To repeal a requirement to reduce by 2 percent the amount payable to 

each State in fiscal year 2008. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2008 

Mr. PEARCE (for himself, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mrs. 

CUBIN, Mr. HELLER of Nevada, Mrs. MCMORRIS RODGERS, Mr. CANNON, and Mr. SALI) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To repeal a requirement to reduce by 2 percent the amount 

payable to each State in fiscal year 2008. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restoring the West’s 

5 Fair Share Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress makes the following findings: 

8 (1) Congress agreed to give each State a fair 

9 share of the receipts generated from mineral develVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:27 Feb 07, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5238.IH H5238

smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5238 IH

1 opment on Federal lands in the State. In essence, 

2 the State government and Federal Government were 

3 to be partners in the mineral production that takes 

4 place on Federal lands. 

5 (2) The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 

6 (Public Law 110–161) reduces these State receipts 

7 by as much as 2 percent for fiscal year 2008. 

8 (3) The States have at least as much interest 

9 in public lands within their borders as does the cen10 tral Federal Government. 

11 (4) The Federal Government does not pay prop12 erty taxes for public lands to States or localities in 

13 any form approaching financial equity. As a con14 sequence, those States in which there are Federal 

15 public land holdings are denied revenues that are 

16 needed for necessary public purposes, such as edu17 cation, roads, and hospitals. This creates a burden 

18 on private owners of property. The burden is greater 

19 for private owners of property in States with larger 

20 Federal public land holdings. 

21 (5) The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 

22 will have a negative impact on mineral producing 

23 Western States. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5238 IH

1 SEC. 3. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO DEDUCT FROM AN 

2 AMOUNT PAYABLE TO EACH STATE. 

3 Title I of division F of the Consolidated Appropria4 tions Act, 2008 is amended under the heading ‘‘Minerals 

5 Management Service’’, under the heading ‘‘administrative 

6 provisions’’, by striking the second sentence. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Bruce Antoine FELTON.

No. 91P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Kevin P. Bradley, Durham, for Bruce A. Felton.

*838William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of February 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
FLORIDA 

#4 

ΨϮε͘Θ^WEd/E

ηϭε

Ϯ͘ςйK&^dd'W

ρ͘κй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

Ψϭ͕ϯΘε

PER RESIDENT 

#4 

$22.3 B CONTRACT 

ης

ϭϮε͕εϭϯEhDZ

ηρ

Ψϳ͘ρWZ^KEE>

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ κй

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ ϯρй

ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ρй

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐ ĂŶĚ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ρςй

By Service 

Army 

23% 

Navy/Marines 

32% 

Air Force 

28% 

Other Defense 

17% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Reserve: 19% 

Active Duty: 46% 

National 

Guard: εй

Civilian: 26% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

23% 

Navy/Marines 

41% 

Air Force 

34% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors 

>ŽĐŬŚĞĞĚDĂƌƟŶ

EŽƌƚŚƌŽƉ'ƌƵŵŵĂŶ

'ĞŶĞƌĂůLJŶĂŵŝĐƐ

>ĞŽŶĂƌĚŽ^Ɖ

,ŽŶĞLJǁĞůů

ƌŽǁůĞLJ

ZĂLJƚŚĞŽŶ

ŽŽnjůůĞŶ,ĂŵŝůƚŽŶ

,ĂƌƌŝƐŽƌƉ͘

/ŶĐ͘

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψκ͘ς

Ψϯ͘ϯ

Ψϭ͘Ϭ

Ψϳϳϭ͘ϮD

ΨϳϬϭ͘ςD

Ψρςϳ͘ρD

ΨκεΘ͘ςD

Ψϯϳϭ͘ϯD

ΨϯκϮ͘ϭD

ΨϮΘϬ͘ρD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ΨϮϮ͘ϯ

Ψϭρ͘ϭ Ψϭρ͘ϭ Ψϭϯ͘ε

Ψϭϭ͘κ ΨϭϬ͘Θ

&zϭϮ &zϭϯ

Ψε͘ε

&zϭκ

ΨΘ͘ς

&zϭρ &zϭς &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

Ψϳ͘ρ/>>/KE ϭϮε͕εϭϯ

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

ŽƵŶƚLJ ĐƚŝǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

ƵǀĂů ϭϮ͕ϯΘρ ε͕ϭϮϮ ϭ͕Θςκ κ͕ϭϭΘ Ϯϳ͕κΘε

KŬĂůŽŽƐĂ ϭϳ͕ϳκϯ ϳ͕ϮκϬ ϭϬϳ Ϯ͕ϬΘε Ϯϳ͕ϭϳε

ƐĐĂŵďŝĂ ϭϭ͕ϯςς Ϯ͕ρκϭ ϭΘε ϭ͕ϬϯΘ ϭρ͕ϭϯκ

,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽƵŐŚ ρ͕ΘϯϬ Ϯ͕ϳϯε κςϮ κ͕ϭϯϳ ϭϯ͕ϭςΘ

DŝĂŵŝͲĂĚĞ ϭ͕ϭϳϭ ϭ͕ϮΘς ϮΘϭ ϯ͕εκρ ς͕ςΘϯ

KƌĂŶŐĞ Ϯκς Ϯ͕κκε ϯϮϳ ϯ͕ϭκε ς͕ϭϳϭ

ĂLJ Ϯ͕ϭϬϬ Ϯ͕ϳΘκ κεκ κϯκ ρ͕ΘϭϮ

ƌĞǀĂƌĚ ϭ͕ςϯϬ Ϯ͕κϮϳ ϯϳϯ ϭ͕Ϯϳϳ ρ͕ϳϬϳ

WŝŶĞůůĂƐ ςς ϯρϭ Θϳϭ ϭ͕ϮΘς Ϯ͕ρϳκ

WĂůŵĞĂĐŚ ϳΘ ϮςϬ ϯϳς ϭ͕ϭϬϳ ϭ͕ΘϮϭ

36 KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CFLORIDA AL YEAR 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

^ĂŶƚĂZŽƐĂ

DŽŶƌŽĞ

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

KƌĂŶŐĞ

ƌĞǀĂƌĚ

,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽƵŐŚ

KŬĂůŽŽƐĂ

ƵǀĂů

WŝŶĞůůĂƐ

ĂLJ

DŝĂŵŝͲĂĚĞ

ƌŽǁĂƌĚ

ƐĐĂŵďŝĂ

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψρ͘ϯ

Ψρ͘ϯ

ΨϮ͘ϭ

ΨϮ͘ϭ

ΨϮ͘Ϭ

Ψϭ͘ς

Ψϭ͘Ϭ

Ψςϯε͘κD

Ψκϯϭ͘εD

ΨϮεε͘ϮD

KŬĂůŽŽƐĂ

ƵǀĂů

,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽƵŐŚ

ƐĐĂŵďŝĂ

ĂLJ

ƌĞǀĂƌĚ

KƌĂŶŐĞ

DŝĂŵŝͲĂĚĞ

^ĂŶƚĂZŽƐĂ

DŽŶƌŽĞ

Ψϭ͘ε

Ψϭ͘ϳ

ΨΘρϳ͘ρD

ΨϳϬϮ͘ρD

Ψκϯϭ͘ϬD

$344.3 M 

$333.4 M 

ΨϯϬε͘ρD

ΨϭϬΘ͘κD

ΨϭϬϮ͘ΘD

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

ƵǀĂů

ĂLJ

KŬĂůŽŽƐĂ

ƌĞǀĂƌĚ WŝŶĞůůĂƐ

,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽƵŐŚ

ƌŽǁĂƌĚ

DŝĂŵŝͲĂĚĞ

KƌĂŶŐĞ

ƐĐĂŵďŝĂ

ƵǀĂů

ĂLJ

KŬĂůŽŽƐĂ

ƌĞǀĂƌĚ

,ŝůůƐďŽƌŽƵŐŚ

DŝĂŵŝͲĂĚĞ

KƌĂŶŐĞ

ƐĐĂŵďŝĂ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε 37
100 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Federal Contracting, Inc. $157.6 M

Voith Hydro, Inc. $146.8 M

Walsh Group $79.2 M

Sterling Computers $75.7 M

National Presto Industries $22.8 M

Roundhouse-MV JV $18.3 M

PCC Ventures $16.7 M

Peska Construction, Inc. $16.0 M

Rosenbauer Beteiligungsverwaltung $14.5 M

QSJV, LLC $8.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

SOUTH DAKOTA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$400.6 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

9,325

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Meade 3,308 11 112 22 3,453

Minnehaha 24 314 1,606 335 2,279

Pennington 13 855 794 ND ND

Brown ND ND 135 77 ND

Davison 0 47 158 0 205

Codington 0 ND 200 0 ND

Hughes 0 49 137 0 186

Charles Mix 0 41 100 0 141

Lake 0 0 127 0 127

Hutchinson 0 0 120 0 120

Construction: 45%

Service: 33%

Supplies and

Equipment: 21%

Active Duty: 36%

Civilian: 15%

National 

Guard: 44%

Reserve: 5%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

70%

5%

19%

5%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

43%

1%

56%

1%

$0.1

$0.2 $0.2

$0.3 $0.3 $0.3

$0.2

$0.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#44 #28 0.2% $1,169 #41 #51 #47 #46

$1.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.6% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

9,325 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$26.8 M GRANT 

SPENDING

Research and

Development: 0%
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 101

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Moody

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Meade

Lawrence

Pennington

Oglala Lakota Charles Mix

SOUTH DAKOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Meade

Charles Mix

Union

Minnehaha

Pennington

Deuel

Lawrence

Lincoln

Codington

Oglala Lakota

(M = millions)

$326.4 M

$147.7 M

$76.5 M

$33.8 M

$24.1 M

$22.8 M

$1.9 M

$412.1 K

$380.1 K

$297.8 K

Meade

Pennington

Minnehaha

Hughes

Davison

Charles Mix

Brown

Codington

Buffalo

Moody

$200.1 M

$83.0 M

$66.7 M

$7.6 M

$4.8 M

$4.7 M

$4.5 M

$3.9 M

$3.3 M

$2.7 M

Meade

Codington

Codington

Brown

Minnehaha

Lincoln

Union

Deuel

Pennington

Buffalo

Davison

Hughes

Charles Mix

Minnehaha
Maurice Montrae PARKS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5330

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* and petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit for further consideration in light of *Rehaif* v. *United States* , 588 U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 2191, 204 L.Ed.2d 594 (2019).
SCPR-24-0000362

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

IN RE ALLISON WIDNEY, Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN IN GOOD STANDING

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition to resign from the 

practice of law in the State of Hawaiʻi, filed by attorney 

Allison Widney (Widney), pursuant to Rule 1.10 of the Rules of 

the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi (RSCH), but to retain 

the paper license as a memento, as authorized by RSCH Rule 

1.10(b), and the declarations submitted in support thereof, we 

conclude that Widney has complied with the requirements of RSCH 

Rule 1.10. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition to resign is 

granted. Widney may retain the paper license as a memento.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g) 

that Widney shall comply with the notice, declaration, and 

record requirements of RSCH Rule 2.16(a), (b), (d) and (g).

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPR-24-0000362

24-JUN-2024

08:46 AM

Dkt. 10 OGP
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the 

name of Widney, attorney number 11291, from the roll of 

attorneys of the State of Hawaiʻi, effective with the filing of 

this order.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, June 24, 2024.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
dvax-ex104_250.htm



 


	

	
Exhibit 10.4

	
2929 Seventh Street, Suite 100
	
 

	
Berkeley, California 94710
	
 




 

 

HAND DELIVERED

May 30, 2019

Ryan Spencer

172 Gordon Way

Martinez, CA 94553

Re: Promotion

Dear Ryan,

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I am pleased to confirm your promotion and associated change in compensation effective May 16, 2019.

New Title: Senior Vice President, Commercial 

New Annual Base Salary: $360,000

New Bonus Target: 50%

Note: Your 2019 Annual Bonus (payable in Q1 2020) will be prorated as follows:


	
 
	
•
	
The period from January 1, 2019 – May 1, 2019 will be calculated on your former annual base salary of $296,010 and your former bonus target of 40%





	
 
	
•
	
The period from May 16, 2019 – December 31, 2019 will be calculated at your new base salary of $360,000 and your new bonus target of 50%




Congratulations on this well-deserved promotion!

Best regards,

/s/ Peggy Phillips

Peggy Phillips

Chair, Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors 

CC: Personnel file and Payroll

 


	
Phone: 510-848-5100
	
Toll-Free: 877-848-5100
	
Fax: 510-848-1327
	
www.dynavax.com




 



 


	

	
 

	
2929 Seventh Street, Suite 100
	
 

	
Berkeley, California 94710
	
 




 

 

HAND DELIVERED

May 30, 2019

Ryan Spencer

172 Gordon Way

Martinez, CA 94553

Re: Monthly Stipend for Interim Appointment to The Shared Office of The President

Dear Ryan,

This letter confirms the monthly stipend of $6,500 associated with your interim appointment to the shared Office of the President effective May 21, 2019.  The monthly stipend will be paid on the last payroll cycle of each month for each month (including partial months) that you serve in this interim capacity.  In addition, the monthly stipend earnings will be included as income in the calculation of your 2019 Annual Bonus award.  

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I want to personally thank you for accepting this interim leadership role during this period of transition for Dynavax.

Best regards,

/s/ Peggy Phillips

Peggy Phillips

Chair, Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors 

CC: Personnel file and Payroll

 


	
Phone: 510-848-5100
	
Toll-Free: 877-848-5100
	
Fax: 510-848-1327
	
www.dynavax.com
STATE of North Carolina v. Michael Lee DUFF.

No. 407P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Elizabeth F. Parsons, Assistant Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Anne Bleyman, for Michael Lee Duff.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Attorney General on the 4th day of August 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th day of August 2005 by Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40231-40232]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RC11-6-013]


North American Electric Reliability Corporation; Notice of Staff 
Review of Enforcement Programs

    Commission staff coordinated with the staff of the North American 
Electric

[[Page 40232]]

Reliability Corporation (NERC) to conduct the annual oversight of the 
Find, Fix, Track and Report (FFT) program, as outlined in the March 15, 
2012 Order,\1\ and the Compliance Exception (CE) Program, as proposed 
by NERC's September 18, 2015 annual Compliance Filing and accepted by 
delegated letter order.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ North American Electric Reliability Corp., 138 FERC ] 
61,193, at P 73 (2012) (discussing Commission plans to survey a 
random sample of FFTs submitted each year to gather information on 
how the FFT program is working).
    \2\ North American Electric Reliability Corp., Docket No. RC11-
6-004, at 1 (Nov. 13, 2015) (delegated letter order) (accepting 
NERC's proposal to combine the evaluation of CEs with the annual 
sampling of FFTs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commission staff reviewed a sample of 29 FFT noncompliances out of 
191 FFT noncompliances posted by NERC between October 2020 and 
September 2021 and a sample of 32 CE noncompliances out of 1,050 CE 
noncompliances posted by NERC between October 2020 and September 2021.
    Commission staff found that the FFT and CE programs are meeting 
expectations, with limited exceptions. Specifically, Commission staff 
identified one instance where the CE would be more appropriate as an 
FFT with a moderate risk. Staff also noted in two instances of FFT that 
the originally posted description of the noncompliances were 
incomplete. The Regional Entities appropriately included 60 of the 61 
samples in the FFT and CE programs, and all 61 FFTs and CEs have been 
adequately remediated and the root cause of each noncompliance was 
clearly identified. Commission staff also reviewed the supporting 
information for these FFTs or CEs and agreed with the final risk 
determinations for 60 of the 61 noncompliances, which clearly 
identified the factors affecting the risk prior to mitigation (such as 
potential and actual risk) and actual harm.
    Finally, Commission staff noted that the FFTs and CEs sampled did 
not contain any material misrepresentations by the registered entities.

    Dated: June 29, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-14331 Filed 7-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
OHIO 

ηϭΘ #32 ϭ͘Θй ΨΘρΘ ηϭε ηϭϭ ηϭϮ

ΨϭϬ͘Ϭ^WEd/E ϭ͘κйK&^dd'W OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT Ψς͘ϳKEdZd ςϭ͕εΘεEhDZK& $3.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ Ϯй ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ

ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ϭςй

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐĂŶĚ ^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ Ϯεй ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ρϮй

By Service 

Army 

14% 

Navy/Marines 

14% 

Air Force 

49% 

Other Defense 

23% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Reserve: 18% Active Duty: ϭϭй

Civilian: 44% National 

Guard: 27% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

31% 

Navy/Marines

5% 

Air Force 

48% 

Other Defense 

16% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

'ĞŶĞƌĂůůĞĐƚƌŝĐ Ψϭ͘ϭ

&D/ŶƚĞƌŶĂƟŽŶĂů Ψϯϳς͘ϳD

ĂƩĞůůĞDĞŵŽƌŝĂů/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ Ψϭεκ͘ϯD

>ϯdĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐ ΨϭεϮ͘ςD

tŽƌŶŝĐŬ Ψϭϳϭ͘ϬD

ZŝǀĞƌƐŝĚĞZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚ/ŶƐƟƚƵƚĞ ΨϭϳϬ͘ϭD

ŽĞŝŶŐ Ψϭςϯ͘ϯD

hŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJŽĨĂLJƚŽŶ Ψϭρϯ͘ςD

džĐĞůŝƚĂƐdĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐ,ŽůĚŝŶŐƐ Ψϭϯϯ͘ϯD

ůŝŽŶ^ĐŝĞŶĐĞĂŶĚdĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJ ΨϭϬρ͘ϳD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψς͘ϳ Ψς͘Ϯ Ψρ͘κ

&zϭϮ

Ψκ͘Θ Ψκ͘ε Ψκ͘κ

&zϭϯ &zϭκ

Ψϯ͘Θ Ψκ͘Ϭ

&zϭρ &zϭς &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$3.3 BILLION ςϭ͕εΘε

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

ŽƵŶƚLJ

'ƌĞĞŶĞ

&ƌĂŶŬůŝŶ

ƵLJĂŚŽŐĂ

,ĂŵŝůƚŽŶ

ůĂƌŬ

dƌƵŵďƵůů

ZŝĐŚůĂŶĚ

^ƚĂƌŬ

^Ƶŵŵŝƚ

&ƵůƚŽŶ

ĐƟǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

ρ͕κϮϭ ϭκ͕κΘς Θς

ϯκρ ϳ͕ϬΘε ϯ͕ϳϳε

ϭΘε Ϯ͕ϳϳϭ κϬϳ

ϭϮϯ Ϯϳϳ ϳϯϮ

E ϯΘϮ ϭ͕ςκρ

ϯϮ ςϯ ϯρϯ

E ϮεϬ ϭ͕ρρϭ

ϯϯ Ϯρ ΘκΘ

E ϭϳϮ ςϭΘ

E Ϭ ϭ͕Ϭκε

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ

Ϯ͕ρϭς

ϯ͕ϬϬϭ

Ϯκϯ

εςϮ

Ϭ

ϭ͕ρϳϯ

Ϭ

ΘρϬ

ΘϯΘ

Ϭ

dŽƚĂů

ϮϮ͕ρϬε

ϭκ͕Ϯϭκ

ϯ͕ςϭϬ

Ϯ͕Ϭεκ

E

Ϯ͕ϬϮϭ

E

ϭ͕ϳρς

E

E

ΘΘ KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR OHIO 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

>ƵĐĂƐ

ƵLJĂŚŽŐĂ

dƌƵŵďƵůů

ZŝĐŚůĂŶĚ

^ƚĂƌŬ

&ƌĂŶŬůŝŶ

,ĂŵŝůƚŽŶ

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

ƵLJĂŚŽŐĂ

&ƌĂŶŬůŝŶ >ŝĐŬŝŶŐ

'ƌĞĞŶĞ

tĂƌƌĞŶ

ƵƚůĞƌ

,ĂŵŝůƚŽŶ

ůĞƌŵŽŶƚ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

'ƌĞĞŶĞ

,ĂŵŝůƚŽŶ

DŽŶƚŐŽŵĞƌLJ

ƵƚůĞƌ

&ƌĂŶŬůŝŶ

ƵLJĂŚŽŐĂ

>ŝĐŬŝŶŐ

ůĞƌŵŽŶƚ

^Ƶŵŵŝƚ

tĂƌƌĞŶ

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψϭ͘Θ

Ψϭ͘ϯ

ΨεϳϬ͘ϭD

Ψκεκ͘ϬD

ΨκΘΘ͘ςD

ΨϮϭϳ͘κD

Ψϭεκ͘κD

ΨϭΘρ͘ϳD

Ψϭϯκ͘ΘD

Ψεϭ͘ϮD

'ƌĞĞŶĞ

&ƌĂŶŬůŝŶ

ƵLJĂŚŽŐĂ

,ĂŵŝůƚŽŶ

ůĂƌŬ

ZŝĐŚůĂŶĚ

dƌƵŵďƵůů

^Ƶŵŵŝƚ

>ƵĐĂƐ

^ƚĂƌŬ

Ψϭ͘Θ

Ψϳϭε͘ΘD

ΨϮϬκ͘ρD

Ψϳϯ͘ρD

Ψρε͘ρD

Ψκρ͘ϬD

Ψκκ͘εD

ΨκϬ͘ϳD

$33.3 M 

Ψϯϯ͘ϭD

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

'ƌĞĞŶĞ

DŽŶƚŐŽŵĞƌLJ

^Ƶŵŵŝƚ

^Ƶŵŵŝƚ

ůĂƌŬ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε Θε
Exhibit 10.30
 
     Position
 Cash Compensation
  Employee Benefits




---



##### 



Stock Options.
  Stock Units.
 Change in Control Agreement. Exhibit A
 Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement. Exhibit B
 Employment Relationship.
 Taxes.




---



##### 



10. Interpretation, Amendment and Enforcement.
     Hansen Medical, Inc.




---



##### 



/s/ Christopher SellsSignature of Christopher Sells
 Dated:
    
    4-08-2008
 Attachment




---



##### 



Vesting Acceleration and Severance Agreement
  1
    
    In the event of an Acquisition of the Company (as defined below) and either a) the
termination his employment for other than Cause (as defined below) or b) the material
change of his employment by substantial diminution in compensation or duties, or c)
substantial relocation of his place of work or d) employee voluntarily resigns, Employee
shall be entitled to the following:
 (i)
    
    One-hundred percent (100%) of any then-unvested shares subject to stock
options issued to Employee shall become immediately vested and exercisable;(ii)
    
    One-hundred percent (100%) of any then-unvested restricted stock units
issued to Employee shall become immediately vested and issued;(iii)
    
    Severance equal to the total of (a) the number of months of Employees
employment with Company at the time of Acquisition, rounded up to the nearest whole
month, but capped at twelve (12) months, (b) divided by twelve (12) months, (c)
multiplied by Employees then current annual salary compensation; and(iv)
    
    Continuation of Employees then-current health, dental, vision, and
life/disability insurance benefits for a period equal to the number of months of
Employees employment with Company at the time of Acquisition, rounded up to the
nearest whole month, but capped at twelve (12) months.
     Confidential 




---



##### 



Understood and Agreed:
 /s/ Christopher Sells
    
    4-08-2008Christopher Sells                Date/s/ Gary Restani
    
    04-14-2008Gary Restani, President and COO
    
    Date
  Confidential 