alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1****KosPharmaceuticals, Inc.****2006 Named Executive Officers Compensation**                   **2005**          **Stock**      **2005 Cash**  **Option**  **2006** **Executive Officer** **Bonus**  **Bonus***  **Salary**              Daniel M. Bell, Chairman of the Board $500,000   18,000  $390,000              Adrian Adams, President and CEO $1,700,000   58,800  $660,000              Christopher P. Kiritsy, Executive Vice Pres., Chief Financial Officer** $105,000   30,000   —              Kevin P. Clarke, Executive Vice Pres., Chief Financial Officer*** $100,000   100,000  $400,000              Andrew I. Koven, Executive Vice Pres., General Counsel $390,000   50,000  $360,000              Ralf H. Rosskamp, Executive Vice Pres., Research and Development $290,000   19,000  $390,000              Mark E. McGovern, Executive Vice Pres., Chief Medical Officer $255,000   19,000  $355,000              Richard A. King, Executive Vice Pres., Commercial Operations $280,000   23,000  $340,000  * Shares issued under the Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan. ** Christopher P. Kiritsy, Kos’ former Executive Vice President, Corporate Development and ChiefFinancial Officer resigned from the Company effective May 20, 2005. *** On November 2, 2005, the Company announced the appointment of Kevin P. Clarke to the positionof Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1

       STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  YEAR ENDED
                                                               DECEMBER 31, 1997
                                                               -----------------
<S>                                                            <C>
Net loss......................................................    $61,899,474
Add back interest expense.....................................      3,590,187
                                                                  -----------
Adjusted net loss.............................................    $65,489,661
Fully diluted weighted average shares.........................     16,595,288
                                                                  -----------
Net loss per share............................................    $      3.95
                                                                  ===========
</TABLE>
--------
(1) The Company issued convertible notes in September 1997 therefore, fully
    diluted earnings per share is not applicable to the years ended December
    31, 1996 or 1995.

(2) Primary earnings per share can be computed from the face of the Statements
    of Operations.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morris Publishing Group, LLC and Morris Publishing Finance Co. (the
Registrants) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), William S. Morris IV, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve K. Stone,
Chief Financial Officer of both Registrants, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |     |  |                         
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | BY: |  | /s/ William S. Morris IV
|                        |  |     |  | William S. Morris IV    
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer 
|                        |  |    
|Date: November 13, 2006 |  | BY: |  | /s/ Steve K. Stone      
|                        |  |     |  | Steve K. Stone          
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Registrants and
will be retained by the Registrants and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1



The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. and Subsidiaries

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
33-13075 of  Rofin-Sinar  Technologies  Inc.  on Form S-8 of our  reports  dated
November 6, 1996,  relating to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of Rofin-Sinar
Technologies  Inc. and  Subsidiaries  as of September 30, 1995 and 1996, and the
related consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders'  equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year  period ended  September 30, 1996,
and the related schedule, which reports appear in the annual report on Form 10-K
of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. as of September 30, 1996.


                                                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Detroit, Michigan
December 30, 1996
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Bruce D. Hansen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Moly, Inc. for thequarter ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of General Moly, Inc.

 

Dated: November 3, 2008

 
|   | By:                            |                    | /s/ Bruce D. Hansen |
|--------|--------------------------------|-------------------------|---------------------|
|   | Name:                          | Bruce D. Hansen         |
|   | Title:                         | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive  Officer) |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commerce Energy Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ending April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Peter Weigand, President (principal executive
officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: June 14, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ PETER WEIGANDPETER WEIGANDPresident(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 23.1



Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors

HealthTronics, Inc.:



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-31820, 333-43412, 333-68292 and 333-104403) on Form S-8 and (No. 333-1068867) on Form S-3 of HealthTronics, Inc. of our reports dated March 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of HealthTronics, Inc. as of December 31,
2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, managements assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004, annual report on Form 10-K
of HealthTronics, Inc.



Effective January 1, 2002 the Company changed its
method of accounting for goodwill and other intangibles.



|              
|--------------
|/s/:KPMG LLP  
|              
|Austin, Texas 
|March 15, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7202

RICKY LEE HANKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THE BOBBY ROSS GROUP, INCORPORATED; LESTER H.

BEARD, Senior Warden; CHARLES K. HARDY, Assistant Warden; DOCTOR BEDWELL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge.

(CA-96-357)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 6, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Lee Hankins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Hankins v. Bobby Ross Group, Inc., No. CA-96-357 (E.D. Va. July 24,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4888 

To allow the Department of Homeland Security to grant a waiver or exception 

from certain airspace restrictions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. FILNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To allow the Department of Homeland Security to grant 

a waiver or exception from certain airspace restrictions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. WAIVERS AND EXCEPTIONS. 

4 Section 521(a)(2)(B) of Division F of the Transpor5 tation, Treasury, and Independent Appropriations Act, 

6 2004 (118 Stat. 343) is amended— 

7 (1) in clause (iv) by striking ‘‘and’’ after the 

8 semicolon; 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4888 IH

1 ‘‘(vi) in any case in which the Sec2 retary of Homeland Security, acting 

3 through the Transportation Security Ad4 ministration, determines that granting a 

5 waiver or exemption poses no security risk 

6 to the event, stadium, or other venue; 

7 and’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

          - [OMB Control No. 2900-XXXX]

# AGENCY:

Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        On Wednesday, June 22, 2022 the Veterans Benefits Administration (VA), published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of Guaranteed or Insured Loan Reporting Requirements. This notice was published in error; therefore, this document corrects that error by withdrawing this FR notice, document number 2022-13257.                    

# DATES:

As of Thursday, June 23, 2022, the FR notice published at 87 FR 13257 on Wednesday, June 22, 2022, is withdrawn.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Maribel Aponte, Office of Enterprise and Integration, Data Governance Analytics (008), 1717 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20006, (202) 266-4688 or email                         *maribel.aponte@va.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

FR Doc. 2022-13257, published on June 22, 2022, 87 FR 13257), is withdrawn by this notice.

By direction of the Secretary:

Maribel Aponte,

VA PRA Clearance Officer, Office of Enterprise and Integration/Data Governance Analytics, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2022-13761 Filed 6-27-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth
in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Frederic H. Moll, M.D., in his capacity as Chief
Executive Officer of Hansen Medical, Inc., hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (i) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Hansen Medical, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 16, 2009



/s/ FREDERIC H. MOLL, M.DChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A to
which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Hansen Medical, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2319** 

JOHN NGECHU NJOGU , Petitioner ,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : April 17, 2014 Decided: April 25, 2014

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Rev. Uduak James Ubo m , UBOM LAW GROUP, PLLC, Washington, D.C. , for Petitioner

. Stuart F. Deler y, Assistant Attorney General, Car l McIntyre, Assistant Director, Jeffrey J. Bernstein , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precede nt in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Ngechu Njogu , a native and citizen of Kenya, petition s for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider and reopen. We deny the petition for review. Njogu devotes most of his appellate brief to the Board’s order dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s July 18, 2013 decision denying relief and ordering him removed. We note that Njogu did not file a timely petition for review
fro m the July 18, 2013 order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (2012);

Stone v. INS , 514 U.S. 386, 394, 405 (1995). Thus, we do not have jurisdiction to review this order. We further note that Njogu does not attempt to challenge that part of the Board’s September 27, 2013 order denying reconsideration. Accordingly,
review is waived. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9); Ngarurih v.
Ashcroft , 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004) (failure to challenge the denial of relief results in abandon ing review ).
Insofar as Njogu challenges the denial of reopening,

we have reviewed the record and conclude that the Board did not
abuse its discretion in finding that Njogu failed to present newly available evidence that would warrant reopening. See 8
C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (2013 ). We also find no error with the Board’s disposition of Njogu’s belated request for voluntary departure.3 Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
WEISBERG v. GRIFFITH

No. COA04-380

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from New Hanover (02CVD3939).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 4, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50670

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

OSCAR LOMELI,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:05-CR-573

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit

Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oscar Lomeli

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v.

United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal

offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Francis J. Cusick,certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSBof BIO-key International, Inc. (the “company”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the companyand have:

 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)           Disclosed in this report any change in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company’smost recent fiscal quarter (the company’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.             The company’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2006         |
|-----------------------------------|
|                              |
| /s/  FRANCIS J.  CUSICK |   | Francis J. Cusick |
| Chief Financial Officer           |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scientific  Energy,  Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005,  as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Jana Meyer,
Treasurer/Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/S/ Jana Meyer
Jana Meyer
Secretary/Treasuer and Director
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


May 9, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michael Don NEELY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9415

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit denied.