alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrice Smith, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 569]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered October 30, 2002, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the People were not *387required to demonstrate probable cause to place the defendant’s photograph in a photographic array *(see People v Watson,*200 AD2d 643 [1994]). Moreover, the lineups were properly conducted while the defendant was lawfully in custody *(see People v Wright,*270 AD2d 213 [2000]; *People v Sainsbury,*231 AD2d 746 [1996]; *People v Crawford,*221 AD2d 462 [1995]; *People v Griffin,*161 AD2d 799, 800 [1990]).

The defendant contends that he was denied his right to testify before the grand jury on the ground that he was not provided prior notice of all the charges which were to be submitted to the grand jury. The defendant waived this contention by failing to move to dismiss the indictment on this ground within five days of his arraignment on the indictment *(see*CPL 190.50 [5] [c]; *People v Knight,*1 AD3d 379 [2003]; *People v Wade,*268 AD2d 448 [2000]; *People v Crosby,*226 AD2d 472 [1996]). In any event, the People met their statutory obligation to provide notice of the grand jury proceedings against him when they gave him notice that the charges contained in a felony complaint against him were to be submitted to the grand jury *(see People v Perez-Tavares,*238 AD2d 446 [1997]).

The defendant’s contentions with respect to the trial court’s instructions to the jury are unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]) and, in any event, the charge to the jury, when considered in its entirety, was adequate *(see People v Killebrew,*297 AD2d 823 [2002]).

The record indicates that the People’s witness with respect to the robbery which occurred on March 30, 2001, was provided an interpreter during the grand jury proceedings. There was no impairment of the integrity of the grand jury process *(see*CPL 210.35; *People v Caruso,*125 AD2d 403 [1986]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 124 (Wednesday, June 29, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 38743]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13819]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-989-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to a Negotiated Rate 
Agreement Filing--Mercuria Energy America, LLC to be effective 6/21/
2022.
    Filed Date: 6/21/22.
    Accession Number: 20220621-5175.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 7/5/22.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above 
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be 
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the 
proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: June 22, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-13819 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
STATE v. MATHIS.

No. COA05-11.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. Charles David BECTON.

No. 426P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 9th day of August 2005 by Defendant for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of October 2005."
44 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

BP $1.7 B

Northrop Grumman $849.5 M

W.S. Darley & Co. $603.3 M

Cardinal Health $416.5 M

Omnicom Group, Inc. $362.1 M

SupplyCore $340.6 M

DMS Pharmaceutical $260.9 M

Patriot Team $237.6 M

FedEx $217.9 M

AAR $164.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

ILLINOIS

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

58,423

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Lake 16,944 1,518 216 3,833 22,511

St. Clair 4,505 3,837 1,048 1,695 11,085

Rock Island 365 4,154 363 372 5,254

Cook 329 737 2,330 1,799 5,195

Sangamon 39 538 2,103 ND ND

Peoria 22 370 1,693 380 2,465

Will 21 78 87 564 750

Champaign 27 330 281 73 711

DuPage 99 148 0 445 692

Winnebago 15 31 410 199 655

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 2%

Service: 30%

Supplies and

Equipment: 67%

Active Duty: 39%

Civilian: 21%

National 

Guard: 23%

Reserve: 17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

17%

10%

20%

54%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

41%

37%

20%

2%

$5.0 $5.1 $5.5

$7.1

$6.2 $6.2 $6.4

$7.5

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#18 #42 1.8% $811 #15 #14 #14 #19

$10.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.0% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$7.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

58,423 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$223.6 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 45

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

McLean

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Vermilion

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ILLINOIS

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Cook

St. Clair

DuPage

Lake

Winnebago

Peoria

Rock Island

Williamson

Madison

Vermilion

(M = millions)

$3.6 B

$1.3 B

$876.7 M

$785.0 M

$421.9 M

$161.7 M

$120.4 M

$97.5 M

$54.0 M

$47.8 M

St. Clair

Lake

Rock Island

Cook

Sangamon

Peoria

Champaign

DuPage

McLean

Madison

$790.4 M

$610.1 M

$416.7 M

$179.0 M

$110.5 M

$74.4 M

$37.0 M

$36.3 M

$17.9 M

$14.3 M

Lake

Winnebago

Cook

DuPage Rock Island

Peoria

St. Clair

Williamson

Madison

Lake

Cook

DuPage Rock Island

Peoria

Champaign

Sangamon

St. Clair

Madison
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIALOFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Thefollowing certification accompanies the issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB,for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, and is not filed, asprovided in Release 33-8212, 34-47551.

 

Inconnection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Treaty Oak Bancorp, Inc.(“Treaty Oak”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Jeffrey L. Nash, Chief Financial Officer of TreatyOak, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Treaty Oak.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Treaty Oak and will be retained by Treaty Oak and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: August 15,  2005 |                     |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                         |                     |
|                         |                     |
|                         | /s/ Jeffrey L.  Nash     |   |
|                         | Jeffrey L. Nash          |
|                         | Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
WALKER v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPT. OF TRANSP.

No. COA04-1258.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
- Home
- Facts
- What are Christmas tree worms?

# **What are Christmas tree worms?**

## **"Christmas tree worm"** is the common name for a marine worm that lives on tropical coral reefs around the world.

*Christmas tree worms come in a variety of bright colors. They aren’t very big, averaging about 1.5 inches in length.*

You won’t find *Spirobranchus giganteus*, also known as the Christmas tree worm, eating your fir tree this year. The common name for these worms is derived from their appearance, not their habitat or diet.

Each worm has two brightly colored crowns that protrude from its tube-like body. These Christmas tree-like crowns are composed of radioles, or hair-like appendages radiating from the worm’s central spine. These appendages are used for respiration and to catch dinner, which typically consists of microscopic plants, or phytoplankton, floating in the water.

These worms are sedentary, meaning that once they find a place they like, they don’t move much. In fact, while the colorful crowns of these worms are visible, most of their bodies are anchored in burrows that they bore into live coral. When startled, Christmas tree worms rapidly retract into their burrows, hiding from would-be predators.

Christmas tree worms come in a variety of bright colors. They aren’t very big, averaging about 3.8 centimeters in length. However, because of their distinctive shape, beauty, and color, these worms are easily spotted. They are some of the most widely recognized polychaetes, or marine burrowing, segmented worms out there.                

##### More **Information**

 Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary: Christmas Tree Worms 

 Flower Garden Banks National Marine Sanctuary: Christmas Tree Worms 

##### **Last updated:**

######  						 11/17/20 					

**Author:** NOAA

How to cite this article

Contact Us

##### 					Feedback

              -  Provide Feedback 
              -  Contact Us
              -  Report an error

##### 					Social

              - 
              - 
              - 
*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
							About NOS						- About Us
- NOS Program Offices
- Media Inquiries
- Website Acknowledgements
- Site Index
- Disclaimer
							More Resources						- Freedom of Information Act
- Accessibility
- Information Quality
- Privacy Policy
- NOS For Employees
- USA.gov
-  Department of Commerce
-  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
-  National Ocean Service
#### Joy Mary Gregory, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Zachary Gregory-Street, an Infant, Appellant, v Cortland Memorial Hospital et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

[801 NYS2d 198]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cayuga County (Peter E. Corning, A.J.), entered April 13, 2004. The order denied plaintiffs motion to set aside the jury verdict.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs *(see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens,*155 AD2d 435 [1989]; *see also*CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]). Present—Green, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, David R. Helwig, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InfraSource Services,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
      and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
director (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2005

/s/ DAVID R. HELWIG
--------------------------------------
David R. Helwig
Chief Executive Officer and President
STATE v. ZIGLER.

No. COA04-1051.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 21, 2005.

Certification Date July 11, 2005.

Appeal from the Wake (02CRS89392).

Case without published opinion. Vacated.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





I, Stephen G. Fendrich, as President and Chief Operating Officer of Simmons Company (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:





(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 27, 2009 (the “Report”), being filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August 21, 2009                  /s/ Stephen G. Fendrich


Name:
Stephen G. Fendrich


Title:
President and Chief Operating Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Simmons Company and will be retained by Simmons Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5092 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic or modoacrylic staple 

fibers, not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2008 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on acrylic or 

modoacrylic staple fibers, not carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACRYLIC OR MODOACRYLIC STAPLE FIBERS, 

4 NOT CARDED, COMBED, OR OTHERWISE 

5 PROCESSED FOR SPINNING. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.62 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 acrylic or modoacrylic staple fibers, not carded, combed, 

9 or otherwise processed for spinning) is amended by strik10 ing ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5092 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5325 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 ENTRIES OF TRUCK TIRES. 

5 (a) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION REQUIRED.— 

6 Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff Act 

7 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520), or any other provi8 sion of law, U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall, 

9 not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act— 

11 (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty each 

12 entry described in subsection (b) containing any 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5325 IH

1 merchandise which, at the time of original liquida2 tion, was merchandise eligible for duty-free treat3 ment under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

4 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.); and 

5 (2) refund any duties and interest paid on such 

6 entries. 

7 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

8 subsection (a) are the following: 

Port Code Date of Entry Entry Number 

5301 09/07/2005 669–2816633–0 

5301 09/13/2005 669–2816686–8 

5301 04/03/2006 669–2818113–1 

5301 04/11/2006 669–2818162–8 

5301 04/18/2006 669–2818213–9 

5301 05/02/2006 669–2818340–0 

5301 05/23/2006 669–2818507–4 

5301 05/30/2006 669–2818627–0 

5301 06/06/2006 669–2818626–2 

5301 06/14/2006 669–2818677–5 

5301 06/15/2006 669–2818697–3 

5301 06/20/2006 669–2818734–4 

5301 06/27/2006 669–2818808–6 

5301 07/04/2006 669–2818852–4 

5301 07/11/2006 669–2818914–2 

5301 07/19/2006 669–2818961–3 

5301 07/25/2006 669–2819019–9 

5301 08/01/2006 669–2819088–4 

5301 08/08/2006 669–2819135–3 

5301 08/15/2006 669–2819205–4 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
WATERS v. WATERS.

No. COA04-506.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Caldwell (03CVD1167).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.
BAK v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY HOSP. SYSTEM, INC.

COA03-994.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 17, 2004.

Certification Date September 7, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                           POWER OF ATTORNEY

                  KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Christie S. Flanagan, Renee Nichols Tucei, and
Eric K. Kawamura or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution for him and in his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the GOLDEN
STATE BANCORP INC. (the "Corporation"), Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1998 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form
10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the
undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to
the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in
connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including
this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Office
of Thrift Supervision, or other appropriate regulatory authority and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorney-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents
this ________ day of March 1999.

                                            /s/ Paul M. Bass, Jr.
                                            ----------------------------
                                            Paul M. Bass, Jr.