alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5322 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To liquidate or reliquidate certain entries of truck tires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION OF CERTAIN 

4 ENTRIES OF TRUCK TIRES. 

5 (a) LIQUIDATION OR RELIQUIDATION REQUIRED.— 

6 Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff Act 

7 of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520), or any other provi8 sion of law, U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall, 

9 not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment 

10 of this Act— 

11 (1) liquidate or reliquidate as free of duty each 

12 entry described in subsection (b) containing any 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5322 IH

1 merchandise which, at the time of original liquida2 tion, was merchandise eligible for duty-free treat3 ment under title V of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

4 U.S.C. 2461 et seq.); and 

5 (2) refund any duties and interest paid on such 

6 entries. 

7 (b) AFFECTED ENTRIES.—The entries referred to in 

8 subsection (a) are the following: 

Port Code Entry Number Date of Entry 

3807 144–2543718–5 03/21/2006 

3807 144–2543746–6 03/28/2006 

3807 144–2543782–1 04/04/2006 

3807 144–2543816–7 04/11/2006 

3807 144–2543843–1 04/18/2006 

3807 144–2543887–8 04/25/2006 

3807 144–2543914–0 05/02/2006 

3807 144–2543942–1 05/09/2006 

3807 144–2543984–3 05/16/2006 

3807 144–2544016–3 05/23/2006 

3807 144–2544038–7 05/30/2006 

3807 144–2544071–8 06/06/2006 

3807 144–2544131–0 06/14/2006 

3807 144–2544155–9 06/20/2006 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE v. HIGH

No. COA05-58.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed November 15, 2005.

Certification Date December 5, 2005

Appeal from the Gaston (02CRS6513, 02CRS6524).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
STATE v. James Jordan COBB, III.

No. 447P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

William L. Osteen, Jr., Greensboro, for Cobb.

R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of August 2005 by Plaintiff for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 18th day of August 2005."
STATE v. MORGAN.

No. COA04-1376.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 21, 2005.

Certification Date July 11, 2005.

Appeal from the Forsyth (00CRS30015).

Case without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
Dorothy ZELLERS v. April N. McNAIR and Transit Management of Charlotte, Inc.

No. 575P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

George C. Piemonte, New York, NY, for Zellers.

C. Grainger Pierce, Jr., Charlotte, Eric A. Rogers, for McNair.

Robert D. McDonnell, for Transit Mgmt. of Charlotte.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of November 2004 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following *926order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1998      
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                          10,109,736
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                10,192,526
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  10,192,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           174,664
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        62,425
<OTHER-SE>                      9,955,437
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    10,192,526
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              546,920
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 58,377
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             58,377
<DISCONTINUED>                  (30,330)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    28,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0.00
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10-KSB of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VII, LP, (the Partnership) for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 6, 2007



|                                                                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                              
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                  
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Operating Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)
STATE v. Alexander C. POLKE.

No. 412A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 8, 2005.

Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*736The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of August 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Serve Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 8th day of September 2005 to serve his/her proposed record upon the district attorney. The parties shall then proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12. By order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of August 2005."
EXHIBIT 32.2



Section 1350 Certification of the Chief
Financial Officer



In connection with the Annual Report of ROFIN-SINAR Technologies
Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ingrid Mittelstaedt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: January 28, 2016

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Ingrid Mittelstaedt
| | Ingrid Mittelstaedt    
| | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of Steiner Leisure Limited certifies that (1) this Annual Report of Steiner Leisure Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Leonard Fluxman                  
| | -------------------------------------
| | Leonard Fluxman                      
| | President and Chief Executive Officer

Date:  February 28, 2008
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4948 

To extend the duty suspension on Crotonaldehyde (2-butenaldehyde). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mr. DAVID DAVIS of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on Crotonaldehyde (2- 

butenaldehyde). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CROTONALDEHYDE (2-BUTENALDEHYDE). 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.44 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Crotonaldehyde (2-butenaldehyde)) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4948 IH

1 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of 

2 this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. William Ernest BAILEY, III.

No. 255P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Kevin P. Bradley, Durham, for William Ernest Bailey, III.

Joseph E. Elder, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of May 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
H. R. 5220 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3800 SW. 

185th Avenue in Beaverton, Oregon, as the ‘‘Major Arthur Chin Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MAJOR ARTHUR CHIN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 3800 SW. 185th Avenue in Beaverton, Oregon, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Major Arthur Chin Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Major Arthur Chin Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5173 

To temporarily delay application of proposed changes to Medicaid payment 

rules for case management and targeted case management services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mr. ELLISON (for himself, Mr. COOPER, Mr. DUNCAN, Ms. MCCOLLUM of 

Minnesota, Mr. RAMSTAD, Mr. WALZ of Minnesota, Mr. PETERSON of 

Minnesota, Mr. CUMMINGS, and Mr. OBERSTAR) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To temporarily delay application of proposed changes to Medicaid payment rules for case management and targeted 

case management services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MORATORIUM ON IMPLEMENTATION OF 

4 CHANGES TO CASE MANAGEMENT AND TAR5 GETED CASE MANAGEMENT PAYMENT RE6 QUIREMENTS UNDER MEDICAID. 

7 (a) DELAYED IMPLEMENTATION OF DECEMBER 4, 

8 2007, INTERIM FINAL RULE.—The interim final rule pub9 lished on December 4, 2007, at pages 68,077 through 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5173 IH

1 68,093 of volume 72 of the Federal Register (relating to 

2 parts 431, 440, and 441 of the Code of Federal Regula3 tions) shall not take effect before April 1, 2009. 

4 (b) CONTINUATION OF 2007 PAYMENT POLICIES

5 AND PRACTICES.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

6 law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 

7 not, prior to April 1, 2009, take any action (through pro8 mulgation of regulation, issuance of regulatory guidance, 

9 use of Federal payment audit procedures, or other admin10 istrative action, policy or practice, including a Medical As11 sistance Manual transmittal or issuance of a letter to 

12 State Medicaid directors) to restrict coverage or payment 

13 under title XIX of the Social Security Act for case man14 agement and targeted case management services if such 

15 action is more restrictive than the administrative action, 

16 policy, or practice that applies to coverage of, or payment 

17 for, such services under title XIX of the Social Security 

18 Act on December 3, 2007. Any such action taken by the 

19 Secretary of Health and Human Services during the pe20 riod that begins on December 4, 2007, and ends on March 

21 31, 2009, that is based in whole or in part on the interim 

22 final rule described in subsection (a) is null and void. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Tradestar Services, Inc. (the “small
      business issuer”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Frederick A. Huttner, Chief Executive Officer of the small
      business issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of this Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the small business
      issuer.








/s/
      Frederick A. Huttner


Frederick
      A. Huttner


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      13, 2006
STATE of North Carolina v. Samuel Wayne GUY.

No. 444P98-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Samuel Wayne Guy, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th day of August 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Cumberland County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
YOUNG (Lindquist) v. YOUNG.

No. 213A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Ronnie M. Mitchell, Harold Lee Boughman, Jr., Fayetteville, for Steven Paul Young.

Dale S. Morrison, Charlotte, for Nona Young.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of May 2005 by Defendant-Intervenors to Dismiss Petition for Discretionary Review:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of June 2005."
JONES v. CITY OF DURHAM.

No. 137A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 25, 2005.

Stewart W. Fisher, Carlos E. Mahoney, Robert B. Glenn, Jr., Durham, for Linda Jones.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 25th day of April 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (City of Durham, et al.) shall have up to and including the 8th day of June 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 25th day of April 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             274
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,199
<ALLOWANCES>                                        90
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,792
<PP&E>                                          70,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,836
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           10,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            67
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,669
<SALES>                                          7,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,834
<CGS>                                            2,638
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,000<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 220<F2>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,867)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,966)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.48)
<FN>
<F1>Reflects provision for litigation expense and related costs based on
Management's assessment of the likelihood of losses from various litigation
matters.
<F2>Net of interest income and other.
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 112 (Friday, June 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 35590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-12488]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 04/04-0319]


CCSD II, L.P.; Surrender of License of Small Business Investment 
Company

    Pursuant to the authority granted to the United States Small 
Business Administration under the Small Business Investment Act of 
1958, as amended, under Section 309 of the Act and Section 107.1900 of 
the Small Business Administration Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 
107.1900) to function as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Company License No. 04/04-0319 issued to CCSD 
II, L.P. said license is hereby declared null and void.

    United States Small Business Administration.
Bailey DeVries,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2022-12488 Filed 6-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
STATE v. RUMPH

No. COA05-281

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed November 1, 2005

Certification Date November 21, 2005

Appeal from Gaston (04CRS288, 04CRS12391, 03CRS67185, 03CRS68925, 03CRS67187, 03CRS67188, 03CRS67189, 03CRS67190).

Cases reported without published opinion. Nor error.
Whistleblower Channel

 Disclosures of Wrongdoing 

Whistleblowers play a vital role in keeping the federal government honest, efficient, and accountable. 

The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) provides a secure channel that current federal employees, former 

employees, and applicants for employment can use to disclose any of the following six types of 

wrongdoing: 

 A violation of any law, rule, or regulation

 Gross mismanagement 

 A gross waste of funds 

 An abuse of authority 

 A substantial and specific danger to public 

health or safety 

 Censorship related to scientific research if 

censorship meets one of the other categories

of wrongdoing (e.g., gross mismanagement)

 What Happens After OSC Receives a Disclosure of Wrongdoing? 

In brief, when a whistleblower disclosure is filed with OSC:

1. The whistleblower is interviewed by OSC staff to determine whether there is a “substantial 

likelihood” that the allegation occurred. The statute requires that the substantial likelihood 

determination be made in 45 days; 

2. The Special Counsel then may require an agency head to investigate and report on the disclosure. 

The whistleblower also has a statutory right to review and comment on the agency report of 

investigation; 

3. After the investigation, the Special Counsel sends the agency’s report, the whistleblower’s 

comments, and the Special Counsel’s determination as to the completeness and apparent 

reasonableness of the agency report and any corrective action, to the President and congressional 

oversight committees; and

4. The information transmitted to the President is made public on OSC’s website.

OSC does not have independent investigative authority in these cases. However, Congress gave OSC

an important oversight role in reviewing government investigations of potential wrongdoing.

 To make a disclosure contact:

U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL

1730 M STREET, N.W., SUITE 218

 WASHINGTON, DC 20036-4505

 https://osc.gov | info@osc.gov

 PHONE: (202) 804-7000* | TOLL FREE: 1-800-872-9855*

 *Hearing and Speech Disabled: Federal Relay Service 1-800-877-8339