alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the first amendment to the Annual Report of Coast
Dental Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ending
December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy G. Merrick, principal financial and
accounting officer of the Company, certify that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period ended
                  December 31, 2002.



/s/ TIMOTHY G. MERRICK
--------------------------------------------
Timothy G. Merrick
Vice President - Finance
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
April 30, 2003
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4951 

To extend the duty suspension on Titanium Mononitride. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mr. DAVID DAVIS of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on Titanium Mononitride. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TITANIUM MONONITRIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.80 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Titanium mononitride) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

10 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4951 IH

1 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of 

2 this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
ROBINSON v. RAPSCALLION MARINE, INC.

No. COA04-1001.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Dare (00CVS248).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  annual  report  of  New  York  Health Care, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I,  Jerry  Braun, Chief
Executive  Officer  of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for  purposes  of  Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge:

      (1)  the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d),  as  applicable,  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934, and


      (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents, in all
      material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of
      the  Company  at  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  indicated.


Date: March 31, 2004                 By: /s/ Jerry Braun
                                     -----------------------
                                         Jerry Braun
                                     Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of BIO-keyInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the periodended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael W. DePasquale, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| BIO-KEY INTERNATIONAL, INC. |                                 |   |   |   |   |   |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
|                             |                                 |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| By:                              | /s/  MICHAEL W. DEPASQUALE |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                             | Michael W. DePasquale                |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                             | Chief Executive Officer              |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                             |                                 |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Date: March 26, 2008        |                                 |   |   |   |   |   |

 

 

----
1830 

Tide predictions begin in 

the United States. The 

American Almanac publishes 

one high tide time prediction 

per day for Boston, New York, 

and Charleston.

1844 

Tide Notes, including 

lunitidal intervals, appear on 

nautical charts of U.S. coasts 

and harbors. 

1853 

The Appendix of the 

Annual Report of the 

Superintendent of the U.S. 

Coast Survey publishes tables 

for obtaining tide predictions 

by the lunitidal interval method 

for the first time. 

1851

Joseph Saxton invents a 

self-registering tide gauge, 

and it is installed by the U.S. 

Coast Survey in San Francisco 

by 1854. 

NOAA and its predecessor agencies have published annual tide tables since the 1860s. 

These tables are used around the world for safe navigation. In October 2015, NOAA issued its 150th edition of Tide Tables.

This information is based on timelines found in “Understanding TidesE” by Steacy Dopp Hicks. 

Hicks, S. D., Szabados, M. W., & Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services (U.S.). (2006). Understanding tides. Silver Spring, Md.: U.S. Dept. of Commerce.

1865 

 U.S. Coast Survey begins 

work on the 1st edition of 

Tide Tables.

1866

In December, the U.S. Coast 

Survey publishes the 1st

edition of Tide Tables for the 

year 1867. 

1867

Sir William Thomson 

(Lord Kelvin) introduces 

the harmonic method for 

tide predictions.

1882 

William Ferrel and Rollin 

Harris of the U.S. Coast and 

Geodetic Survey introduce 

the Maxima and Minima Tide 

Predictor, which begins making 

predictions in 1885. 

1887 

Low tide predictions are 

included for all stations in the 

Tide Tables. 

1896

Tide Tables are extended 

to include ports throughout 

the world.

1912

Harris-Fischer “Tide 

Predicting Machine No. 2” 

replaces Ferrel‘s 

Tide Predictor. 

1923

 Tidal Current Tables are first 

published separately from 

Tide Tables. 

1940

Special restricted tide tables 

for war efforts begin, lasting 

until 1951. Women had a role 

in operating tide prediction 

machines during WWII. 

1965 

Analog-to-digital recorder 

(ADR) tide gauges and 

computer processing 

are introduced. 

1966 

The electronic digital computer 

is introduced for performing 

harmonic analyses and 

computing tide predictions. 

1996

NOAA’s National Ocean 

Service begins providing tide 

and tidal current predictions 

exclusively on the Internet and 

on CDs. Private publishers 

begin printing NOAA 

prediction tables for 

tides and currents. 

2008

Electronic copies of 

the published Tide Tables 

and Tidal Current Tables 

from past years are made 

available as PDF documents 

through NOAA’s Tides & 

Currents website.

2015 

NOAA celebrates 150th

edition of Tide Tables.

1880

Tidal current predictions 

begin for New York Harbor 

and the vicinity. 

1970 

NOAA forms as an agency 

and tide prediction tables 

begin to be published under 

the NOAA name.

150 YEARS OF

TIDE TABLES

150 YEARS OF

TIDE TABLES
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4967 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sodium petroleum sulfonic 

acids, sodium salts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mrs. MYRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on sodium 

petroleum sulfonic acids, sodium salts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SODIUM PETROLEUM SULFONIC ACIDS, SO4 DIUM SALTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.34.01 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 sodium petroleum sulfonic acids, sodium salts) is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4967 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 125 (Thursday, June 30, 2022)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 39321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14197]



[[Page 39319]]

Vol. 87

Thursday,

No. 125

June 30, 2022

Part IV





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Memorandum of June 23, 2022--Delegation of Authority Under Section 
506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961



Memorandum of June 26, 2022--Partnership for Global Infrastructure and 
Investment


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 87 , No. 125 / Thursday, June 30, 2022 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 39321]]

                Memorandum of June 23, 2022

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) 
                of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 621 of the Foreign 
                Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the 
                Secretary of State the authority under section 
                506(a)(1) of the FAA to direct the drawdown of up to an 
                aggregate value of $450 million in defense articles and 
                services of the Department of Defense, and military 
                education and training, to provide assistance to 
                Ukraine and to make the determinations required under 
                such section to direct such a drawdown.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, June 23, 2022

[FR Doc. 2022-14197
Filed 6-29-22; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
STATE v. Paul Dewayne CUMMINGS.

No. 1A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 15, 2005.

William N. Farrell, Jr., Senior Deputy Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*AMENDED*

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of August 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time for Court Reporter to Prepare the Transcript:

"Motion Allowed. By order of the Court in conference this the 15th day of August 2005."
STATE v. CURRIE.

No. COA05-46.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
October 2, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                        |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 16, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Marc L. Reisch                                                                
|                        |  |  |  | Marc L. Reisch President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
HomeNews

# Whale SENSE, Dolphin SMART, and Blue Star

## On Vacation? Make Smarter Charter Choices with these NOAA Programs.

## Whale of a Time

When you head out to the ocean seeking whales, dolphins, or corals, be sure to practice proper ocean etiquette and ask if the company you are using is certified by *Whale SENSE, Dolphin SMART* or *Blue Star*.

Did you know that NOAA partners with commercial whale and dolphin watching companies, as well as diving and snorkeling charters, to promote safe and responsible ocean adventures? While watching dolphins  and whales may not seem obtrusive, when conducted irresponsibly, it can  actually disrupt feeding, nursing, mating, and migrating behaviors and cause  unintended injuries to the animals and the watcher.  Likewise, by practicing responsible diving  and snorkeling, you can lessen local stress on a coral reef ecosystem while  still enjoying its beauty. 

That's why NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service, the Office of  National Marine Sanctuaries, and conservation organizations like Whale and Dolphin Conservation and the Dolphin Ecology Project have developed educational awareness and certification programs dedicated to responsible  whale, dolphin, and coral watching in specific regions around the nation. 

            - Whale SENSE:  Developed in collaboration with the whale watching industry, this program recognizes whale watching companies in the U.S. Atlantic and Alaska are committed to responsible practices.
            - Dolphin SMART:  This program encourages responsible viewing of wild dolphins through partnerships with companies in Hawaii, Florida, and Alabama.
            - Blue Star:  This program, sponsored by the  Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary , aims to reduce the impact of divers and snorkelers on the coral reef ecosystem of the Florida Keys.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - Whale SENSE
          - Dolphin SMART
          - Blue Star
          - National Marine Sanctuaries

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
NEW JERSEY 

ηϭε

Ψε͘Ϭ^WEd/E

#37 

ϭ͘κйK&^dd'W

ϭ͘ςй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

Ψϭ͕ϬϭϮ

PER RESIDENT 

ηϭϳ

Ψϳ͘ϭKEdZd

#24 

ϯκ͕ϮςϭEhDZK&

#22 

Ψϭ͘εWZ^KEE>

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ ϭΘй

ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ Ϯй ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ

ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ϭϬй

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐĂŶĚ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ ςεй

By Service 

Army 

21% 

Navy/Marines 

31% 

Air Force 

20% 

Other Defense 

28% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Active Duty: 19% Reserve: 26% 

National Civilian: 31% 

Guard: 25% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

47% 

Navy/Marines 

17% 

Air Force 

34% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

>ŽĐŬŚĞĞĚDĂƌƟŶ Ψϭ͘ς

,ĂƌƌŝƐŽƌƉ͘ Ψϳςϭ͘κD

^LJƐƚĞŵƐ ΨςϬκ͘ςD

^/ Ψρεκ͘ϮD

dƌĂŶƐŝŐŵ'ƌŽƵƉ ΨϭϳϬ͘ςD

ƌĐƟĐ^ůŽƉĞZĞŐŝŽŶĂůŽƌƉ͘ Ψϭκϯ͘ϳD

,ƵďĞƌн^ƵŚŶĞƌ' Ψϭκϭ͘ϮD

dŽƚĂů^͘͘ Ψϭϭϳ͘ϯD

ŽŶũŽŶDĂƌŝŶĞŽ͘/ŶĐ͘ ΨΘϬ͘ρD

ĞƚŚĞů/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĞƐ/ŶĐ͘ ΨϳΘ͘κD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψϳ͘ϭ

Ψρ͘ρ Ψρ͘ϯ Ψρ͘ς Ψκ͘Θ

&zϭϮ

Ψκ͘ς

&zϭϯ &zϭς

Ψκ͘ρ Ψκ͘ϭ

&zϭκ &zϭρ &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Ψϭ͘ε/>>/KE ϯκ͕Ϯςϭ

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

ŽƵŶƚLJ ĐƟǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

ƵƌůŝŶŐƚŽŶ ρ͕κϯκ Ϯ͕ϳκϭ ϭ͕ϳρς

DŽƌƌŝƐ ϭϯς κ͕ϮϮϮ ςκϯ

KĐĞĂŶ Ϯϳρ Ϯ͕ϮρϮ ςκϯ

DŽŶŵŽƵƚŚ ϮΘϭ ϯϮε ςΘε

ƚůĂŶƟĐ E ϯρΘ ϭ͕ϯϯϳ

ĂŵĚĞŶ κϮ ϳϬ ϯρΘ

ĞƌŐĞŶ ςϯ Ϯϳ ϯεϯ

,ƵĚƐŽŶ ϭϮ εΘ ϯϯϮ

ƐƐĞdž E ϯϭ κϳκ

DĞƌĐĞƌ ϭρ ΘϬ ϮϮϭ

ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

ϳ͕ϭϬΘ ϭϳ͕Ϭϯε

ϯϮκ ρ͕ϯϮρ

ϭϳ ϯ͕ϭΘϳ

κΘϯ ϭ͕ϳΘϮ

ϳΘ E

Ϯερ ϳςρ

ϭϮϬ ςϬϯ

ϭρϳ ρεε

Ϭ E

ϭΘϯ κεε

ϳΘ KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε
NEW JERSEY FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

ĞƌŐĞŶ

DŽƌƌŝƐ

,ƵĚƐŽŶ

ƵƌůŝŶŐƚŽŶ

KĐĞĂŶ

ƚůĂŶƚŝĐ

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

WĂƐƐĂŝĐ

ĞƌŐĞŶ

DŽƌƌŝƐ

^ŽŵĞƌƐĞƚ ƐƐĞdž

DŽŶŵŽƵƚŚ

ĂŵĚĞŶ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ƵƌůŝŶŐƚŽŶ

WĂƐƐĂŝĐ

DŽƌƌŝƐ

ƐƐĞdž

ĂŵĚĞŶ

^ŽŵĞƌƐĞƚ

DŽŶŵŽƵƚŚ

DĞƌĐĞƌ

ĞƌŐĞŶ

DŝĚĚůĞƐĞdž

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

$2.2 B 

Ψϭ͘ϯ

ΨεϯϬ͘ϮD

ΨςϳΘ͘ρD

ΨϯϮκ͘ρD

ΨϮϳϬ͘ςD

ΨϮςϯ͘ϳD

Ψϭεϳ͘εD

ΨϭρϮ͘ρD

Ψϭϯϳ͘ςD

ƵƌůŝŶŐƚŽŶ

DŽƌƌŝƐ

KĐĞĂŶ

DŽŶŵŽƵƚŚ

ƚůĂŶƟĐ

ĂŵĚĞŶ

,ƵĚƐŽŶ

ƐƐĞdž

ĞƌŐĞŶ

DĞƌĐĞƌ

ΨΘϯρ͘ΘD

ΨρϬς͘ϮD

ΨϮρκ͘ςD

$77.3 M 

ΨρΘ͘εD

ΨϮς͘ϬD

ΨϮϮ͘ςD

ΨϮϭ͘ςD

Ψϭε͘κD

Ψϭε͘κD

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

ƐƐĞdž

DĞƌĐĞƌ

ĂŵĚĞŶ

DĞƌĐĞƌ

DŽŶŵŽƵƚŚ

ƵƌůŝŶŐƚŽŶ

DŝĚĚůĞƐĞdž

ƚůĂŶƟĐ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε 79
28 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $3.0 B

United Launch Alliance $1.1 B

Sierra Nevada Corp. $513.5 M

Raytheon Technologies $369.6 M

L3Harris Technologies $359.6 M

Jacobs $303.3 M

Bechtel Group $232.2 M

Veritas Capital Fund Management, LLC $150.7 M

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. $87.9 M

Tlingit Haida Tribal Business Corp. $80.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

COLORADO

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.9 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

59,917

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

El Paso 31,780 8,865 1,043 4,662 46,350

Arapahoe 1,935 1,350 2,300 1,714 7,299

Denver 318 280 419 611 1,628

Adams 15 117 315 1,008 1,455

Weld 11 92 497 109 709

Jefferson 40 206 0 355 601

Pueblo 26 380 142 0 548

Boulder 93 65 188 ND ND

Larimer 41 13 105 ND ND

Montrose ND 0 125 0 ND

Construction: 2% Research and

Development: 29%

Service: 50%

Supplies and

Equipment: 19% 

Civilian: 20% Active Duty: 57%

National 

Guard: 9%

Reserve: 14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

9%

14%

62%

16%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

59%

4%

33%

5%

$4.5 $5.0 $5.7 $5.7 $6.2 $6.9 $7.7

$8.8

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#16 #14 2.3% $2,215 #13 #15 #11 #10

$12.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.7% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$8.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

59,917 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$213.0 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 29

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Weld

Adams

Arapahoe

El Paso

Pueblo

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Adams

Arapahoe

Mesa

El Paso

Pueblo

COLORADO FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2022

El Paso

Douglas

Arapahoe

Denver

Pueblo

Jefferson

Boulder

Larimer

Adams

Mesa

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.9 B

$2.7 B

$1.8 B

$512.4 M

$258.3 M

$200.4 M

$166.0 M

$161.2 M

$94.8 M

$27.0 M

El Paso

Arapahoe

Denver

Adams

Pueblo

Jefferson

Weld

Boulder

Douglas

Larimer

$3.2 B

$408.1 M

$84.0 M

$51.5 M

$38.6 M

$32.5 M

$25.5 M

$21.2 M

$11.0 M

$7.9 M

Larimer

Boulder 

Denver Jefferson

Douglas

Larimer

Boulder 

Douglas

Jefferson

Denver

(M = millions, B = billions)