FISCAL YEAR 2021 

U.S. Department of Defense 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation 

1 

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation 

(OLDCC) (formerly the Office of Economic Adjustment) partnered with the Library of Congress’s 

Federal Research Division (FRD) to produce this report. FRD’s analytical team includes Vega 

Bharadwaj, Katarina David, Zachary Ham, Sarah McNeal, Nathaniel Reynolds, and Alan Stone. 

Liz Chimienti managed this project for OLDCC and provided input throughout the report’s 

development. 

This research benefited from the guidance of staff at the DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center, 

the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and the Congressional Research Service. Experts at the 

American Enterprise Institute, Brookings Institution, Center for a New American Security, and 

Center for Strategic and International Studies generously offered feedback on earlier versions of 

this report. 

Please direct any questions or suggestions for future reports via email to: 

Tara Butler 

Program Director, Intergovernmental Affairs 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, U.S. Department of Defense 

tara.a.butler4.civ@mail.mil

An electronic copy of this report is located online at https://oldcc.gov/dsbs-fy2021.

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021
2 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Acknowledgments............................................. 1

Introduction .................................................. 3

State and District of Columbia Summary Table.................... 7

How to Read This Report...................................... 10

United States Overview ....................................... 14

State and District of Columbia Profiles.......................... 18

Appendix 1: Military Installations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120

Appendix 2: Methodology .................................... 127
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020 3

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of a state by state 

analysis of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) contract 

and personnel spending during fiscal year (FY) 2021. 

The report’s graphs, maps, and tables present a range 

of findings, such as total spending figures, categories of 

contracted goods and services, major defense vendors, 

and numbers and types of defense personnel. State and 

local officials may use this information to assess a region’s 

dependence on defense spending and to target assistance 

to support more resilient communities and companies.

Conducted between March 2022 and September 2022, 

the analysis primarily entailed an examination of DoDfunded prime­ and sub­award contract data and defense 

personnel and payroll figures. Findings are drawn from an 

array of sources, including the DoD’s Defense Manpower 

Data Center and USAspending.gov, which is managed by 

the U.S. Department of the Treasury. 

FY 2021 Overview

The DoD's budget authority decreased from $738.8 billion 

in FY 2020 to $713.9 billion in FY 2021.1 DoD contract 

obligations and payroll spending in all 50 states and the 

District of Columbia totaled $559.0 billion, approximately 

$1,684 per U.S. resident and 2.3 percent of the country’s 

gross domestic product (GDP) (see table 1). Contracts 

for various products and services totaled $398.7 billion, 

thus comprising the majority of the spending, while DoD 

personnel payroll accounted for $160.3 billion.

Most contract funds went to supplies and equipment 

(such as aircraft, ships, weapons, and parts; 53 percent) 

and services (36 percent), with research and development 

(8 percent) and construction (3 percent) comprising the 

remainder. The largest portion of personnel pay was for 

active duty military (45 percent), followed by civilians (40 

percent), the National Guard (9 percent), and the Reserves 

(6 percent). 

 RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions)

1 Virginia $62.7

2 California $57.4

3 Texas $47.3

4 New York2 $30.9

5 Florida $30.1

6 Maryland $26.3

7 Massachusetts $21.3

8 Connecticut $19.3

 9 Washington $19.1

10 Pennsylvania $16.5

Total for Top Ten States $330.9

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $559.0

Table 1: Top 10 States by Total Defense Spending

 RANK STATE PERCENTAGE

 1 Virginia 10.2%

2 Hawaii 8.3%

3 District of Columbia 6.3%

4 Connecticut 6.2%

5 Alaska 6.2%

6 Alabama 6.1%

7 Maryland 5.8%

8 Kentucky 5.7%

9 Mississippi 4.3%

10 Maine 4.1%

Examined at the state level, defense spending ranged 

from $475.9 million in Wyoming to $62.7 billion in 

Virginia, with a median value of $6.3 billion per state 

among the 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Table 2: Top 10 States by Defense Spending as Percentage of State GDP

1

 Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2022 (Washington, DC: August 2021): 6, https://comptroller.defense.gov/

Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/FY2022/FY22_Green_Book.pdf.

2

 This ranking is attributable to COVID-19 vaccines and treatments purchased by the Department of Defense, on behalf of and in coordination with the U.S. Department of 

Health and Human Services. New York has not been among the top ten in prior years.
Approximately 59 percent of the DoD’s $559.0 billion went 

to 10 states (see table 1). On average, defense spending 

comprised 2.6 percent of a state’s GDP. Several states that 

exceeded this average, however, were not among the top 

recipients of total defense spending, including Hawaii 

(8.3 percent of state GDP), the District of Columbia (6.3 

percent), Alaska (6.2 percent), Alabama (6.1 percent), 

Kentucky (5.7 percent), Mississippi (4.2 percent), and 

Maine (4.1 percent; see table 2). 

Further review shows that some states received substantial 

funds for both contract and personnel spending, while 

other states received relatively high amounts in only 

one. Specifically, California, Florida, Maryland, Texas, 

and Virginia were all among the top ten recipients of 

defense contract and personnel spending. Arizona, a major 

recipient of defense contract funds, was not among the 

top ten states for overall defense spending (see table 3). 

Table 3: Top 10 States by Defense Contract Spending 

RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions) 

1 Virginia $42.6

 2 California $40.2

 3 Texas $35.1 

4 New York $27.9 

5 Florida $21.7

 6 Massachusetts $20.1

 7 Connecticut $18.4 

8 Maryland $17.9 

9 Pennsylvania $13.4 

10 Arizona $12.3 

Total for Top Ten States $249.6 

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $398.7 

Similarly, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, and North Carolina 

were among the largest recipients of defense personnel 

spending, but were not among the top states for overall 

defense spending (see table 4).

Table 4: Top 10 States by Defense Personnel Spending 

RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions) 

1 Virginia $20.1 

2 California $17.2 

3 Texas $12.2 

4 Florida $8.4 

5 Maryland $8.3

 6 North Carolina $7.6 

7 Washington $7.4 

8 Georgia $7.3

 9 Hawaii $5.3 

10 Colorado $4.0 

Total for Top Ten States $97.9 

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $160.3

An Excel-formatted workbook featuring metrics from the 

FY 2021 report is located at https://oldcc.gov/dsbs-fy2021. 

Appendix 2 contains additional details on this report’s 

research methodology. 

4 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021
Data Sources and Publications Used in This Analysis

DATA SOURCE PERTINENT INFORMATION 

USASpending.gov U.S. Department of the Treasury Prime- and sub-award spending on 

defense-related goods and services 

Defense Manpower Data Center U.S. Department of Defense Personnel counts as of September 30, 

2021 and gross payroll figures 

Gross Domestic Product by State, 

Fourth Quarter and Annual 2021 

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau 

of Economic Analysis State gross domestic product totals 

“2021 National and State Population 

Estimates” 

U.S. Department of Commerce, Census 

Bureau State and national population figures 

Defense Procurement and Acquisition 

Policy U.S. Department of Defense Spending categories 

“HUD USPS ZIP Code Crosswalk Files: 

ZIP-County Crosswalk” 

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban 

Development Counties corresponding to ZIP codes 

“Military Installations, Ranges and 

Training Areas” U.S. Department of Defense Military installations by state and county 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 5
This page intentionally left blank
 

SUMMARY TABLE 

The following table shows U.S. Department of Defense 

(DoD) contract and personnel spending data for all 50 

states and the District of Columbia (listed alphabetically) 

in fiscal year (FY) 2021, which can be used to provide 

information and statistics about various topics, such as: 

• The importance of defense spending for a state’s

economy (Columns 1 and 3).

• How that spending compares to other states and the

country overall (Columns 2, 10, and 11).

• The association between defense spending and a state’s

economic reliance on defense-related employment and

industries (Columns 4-9).

The columns show the following variables: 

1. Defense Spending as a Share of GDP identifies the total

amount of defense spending (i.e., contracts and payroll)

per state as a share of that state’s GDP. This provides an

indication of the degree to which a state’s economic

health depends on such funding and how vulnerable

a state is to DoD spending changes.

2. State Share of Total U.S. Defense Spending calculates

each state’s share of total defense spending (i.e.,

contract obligations and payroll in the 50 states plus the

District of Columbia), which helps to identify the largest

and smallest recipients of DoD funding.

3. Defense Spending per Resident is the amount DoD

spent per resident in a state or the District of Columbia

on defense contracts and payroll. Like “Defense

Spending as a Share of GDP,” it shows a state’s relative

dependence on and vulnerability to changes in this

type of support.

4. Total Contract and Payroll Spending is the sum of all

DoD payroll and contract obligations in a state or the

District of Columbia.

5. Total Contract Spending shows the amount DoD

obligated to contracts in a given state or the District

of Columbia.

6. Total Payroll is the gross pay received by active duty,

civilian, National Guard, and Reserve personnel with

an assigned or duty location in a state or the District

of Columbia during FY 2021. These figures, as well as

those in columns 7-9, do not include benefits for

current or former defense personnel.

7. Civilian Pay shows the total gross pay to DoD civilian

personnel in FY 2021.

8. Military Active Duty Pay equals the total gross pay to

active duty personnel in FY 2021.

9. National Guard & Reserve Pay refers to the total gross

pay received by National Guard and Reserve personnel

in FY 2021.

10. Ranking by Defense Spending as a Share of State GDP

indicates a state’s placement among the 50 states and

the District of Columbia with respect to the total

amount of defense spending (i.e., contracts and payroll)

as a share of that state’s GDP.

11. Ranking by Total Defense Spending likewise indicates

a state’s placement among the 50 states and the District

of Columbia.

Detailed information on the methodology for these

statistics is included in appendix 2.

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 7
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

DEFENSE SPENDING 

AS A SHARE OF GDP 

(%)

STATE SHARE OF 

TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

(%)

DEFENSE SPENDING 

PER RESIDENT 

($) 

TOTAL CONTRACT AND 

PAYROLL SPENDING 

($ billions) 

TOTAL CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

($ billions) 

TOTAL PAYROLL 

($ billions) 

Alabama 6.1 2.8 3,123 15.7 12.2 3.5 

Alaska 6.2 0.6 4,916 3.6 1.7 1.9 

Arizona 3.4 2.6 2,013 14.6 12.3 2.3 

Arkansas 1.3 0.3 639 1.9 1.2 0.8 

California 1.6 10.3 1,463 57.4 40.2 17.2 

Colorado 2.8 2.2 2,138 12.4 8.4 4.0 

Connecticut 6.2 3.4 5,347 19.3 18.4 0.9 

Delaware 1.1 0.2 947 1.0 0.5 0.5 

District of Columbia 6.3 1.8 14,614 9.8 7.1 2.7 

Florida 2.3 5.4 1,384 30.1 21.7 8.4 

Georgia 2.1 2.7 1,378 14.9 7.6 7.3 

Hawaii 8.3 1.4 5,465 7.9 2.6 5.3 

Idaho 0.7 0.1 $356 0.7 0.2 0.5 

Illinois 1.0 1.7 749 9.5 7.0 2.5 

Indiana 1.6 1.3 1,059 7.2 5.7 1.5 

Iowa 1.1 0.5 805 2.6 2.1 0.4 

Kansas 1.9 0.7 1,263 3.7 1.5 2.2 

Kentucky 5.7 2.5 3,068 13.8 10.6 3.2 

Louisiana 1.3 0.6 768 3.6 1.7 1.9 

Maine 4.1 0.6 2,348 3.2 2.4 0.8 

Maryland 5.8 4.7 4,258 26.3 17.9 8.3 

Massachusetts 3.2 3.8 3,057 21.3 20.1 1.2 

Michigan 1.1 1.2 649 6.5 5.1 1.4 

Minnesota 0.5 0.4 387 2.2 1.5 0.7 

Mississippi 4.3 1.0 1,911 5.6 3.8 1.8 

Missouri 3.3 2.2 1,979 12.2 10.5 1.7 

Montana 1.0 0.1 586 0.6 0.2 0.4 

Nebraska 1.1 0.3 844 1.7 0.7 1.0 

Nevada 1.5 0.5 974 3.1 1.8 1.3 

New Hampshire 2.3 0.4 1,671 2.3 2.0 0.3 

New Jersey 1.3 1.7 1,002 9.3 7.3 2.0 

New Mexico 2.9 0.6 1,547 3.3 1.8 1.5 

New York 1.6 5.5 1,557 30.9 27.9 3.0 

North Carolina 1.7 2.1 1,113 11.7 4.2 7.6 

North Dakota 1.4 0.2 1,165 0.9 0.2 0.7 

Ohio 1.3 1.8 844 9.9 6.3 3.6 

Oklahoma 2.9 1.1 1,582 6.3 3.0 3.3 

Oregon 0.5 0.2 324 1.4 0.8 0.6 

Pennsylvania 1.9 2.9 1,272 16.5 13.4 3.1 

Rhode Island 2.4 0.3 1,533 1.7 0.8 0.9 

South Carolina 2.2 1.1 1,179 6.1 3.1 3.1 

South Dakota 1.0 0.1 718 0.6 0.2 0.4 

Tennessee 0.7 0.6 462 3.2 2.0 1.2 

Texas 2.2 8.5 1,601 47.3 35.1 12.2 

Utah 2.7 1.1 1,877 6.3 4.3 2.0 

Vermont 1.4 0.1 845 0.5 0.3 0.2 

Virginia 10.2 11.2 7,259 62.7 42.6 20.1 

Washington 2.7 3.4 2,470 19.1 11.7 7.4 

West Virginia 1.0 0.2 496 0.9 0.5 0.4 

Wisconsin 1.3 0.9 857 5.1 4.5 0.6 

Wyoming 1.1 0.1 822 0.5 0.1 0.4 

U.S. Average/Total 2.3 100.0 1,684 559.0* 398.7 160.3 

1 2 3 4 5 6

* These figures do not total $559.0 billion due to rounding.

8
 

 

 

 

CIVILIAN PAY 

($ billions) 

MILITARY ACTIVE 

DUTY PAY 

($ billions) 

NATIONAL GUARD & 

RESERVE PAY 

($ billions) 

RANKING BY DEFENSE 

SPENDING AS A SHARE 

OF STATE GDP 

RANKING BY TOTAL 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

Alabama 2.3 0.7 0.5 6 11 

Alaska 0.4 1.2 0.2 5 31 

Arizona 0.7 1.1 0.5 11 13 

Arkansas 0.2 0.2 0.3 38 40 

California 6.0 9.6 1.7 29 2 

Colorado 1.0 2.6 0.5 16 15 

Connecticut 0.2 0.4 0.2 4 8 

Delaware 0.1 0.2 0.1 40 44 

District of Columbia 1.6 0.9 0.2 3 19 

Florida 2.8 4.4 1.2 20 5 

Georgia 2.6 3.9 0.8 24 12 

Hawaii 1.9 2.9 0.4 2 22 

Idaho 0.1 0.2 0.2 49 47 

Illinois 1.0 0.9 0.6 46 20 

Indiana 1.0 0.1 0.5 28 23 

Iowa 0.1 0.0 0.3 39 37 

Kansas 0.5 1.3 0.3 26 30 

Kentucky 0.7 2.1 0.4 8 14 

Louisiana 0.5 0.9 0.6 34 32 

Maine 0.7 0.0 0.1 10 35 

Maryland 5.2 2.5 0.7 7 6 

Massachusetts 0.6 0.2 0.4 13 7 

Michigan 0.9 0.1 0.4 41 24 

Minnesota 0.2 0.0 0.5 50 39 

Mississippi 0.7 0.6 0.5 9 28 

Missouri 0.5 0.7 0.5 12 16 

Montana 0.1 0.2 0.1 44 48 

Nebraska 0.3 0.5 0.2 42 42 

Nevada 0.2 0.9 0.2 31 36 

New Hampshire 0.1 0.1 0.1 21 38 

New Jersey 1.1 0.5 0.5 36 21 

New Mexico 0.5 0.8 0.2 15 33 

New York 0.8 1.2 1.0 30 4 

North Carolina 1.7 5.3 0.6 27 17 

North Dakota 0.1 0.4 0.1 33 45 

Ohio 2.4 0.5 0.7 37 18 

Oklahoma 1.9 1.1 0.3 14 25 

Oregon 0.2 0.1 0.3 51 43 

Pennsylvania 2.1 0.2 0.7 25 10 

Rhode Island 0.5 0.3 0.2 19 41 

South Carolina 0.8 1.7 0.5 23 27 

South Dakota 0.1 0.2 0.1 45 49 

Tennessee 0.5 0.2 0.5 48 34 

Texas 3.8 6.8 1.6 22 3 

Utah 1.3 0.3 0.4 18 26 

Vermont 0.0 0.0 0.2 32 50 

Virginia 9.9 9.2 1.0 1 1 

Washington 2.6 4.2 0.6 17 9 

West Virginia 0.1 0.0 0.3 47 46 

Wisconsin 0.2 0.1 0.4 35 29 

Wyoming 0.1 0.2 0.1 43 51 

U.S. Average/Total 64.0 72.7 23.6 N/A N/A

7 8 9 10 11

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 9
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

By Type 

By Service 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Boeing $2.1 B

Northrop Grumman $804.6 M

SAIC $590.4 M

M1 Support Services $500.6 M

Torch Technologies $430.2 M

Lockheed Martin $389.9 M

University of Alabama Huntsville Foundation $359.3 M

Defense Systems and Solutions $305.0 M

Austal $278.8 M

Intuitive Research & Technology Corp. $275.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

ALABAMA 

#11 #6 2.8% $3,123 #11 #18 #12

$15.7 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

6.1% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

PER RESIDENT $12.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

51,606 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

$3.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service 

$3.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL 

51,606

TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Madison 715 13,888 454 726 15,783

Montgomery 2,722 3,323 2,692 2,173 10,910

Dale 3,663 2,242 37 151 6,093

Calhoun 39 3,551 923 328 4,841

Jefferson 329 394 2,000 1,640 4,363

Mobile 50 796 813 761 2,420

Tuscaloosa 16 88 279 289 672

Lee 56 21 128 325 530

Houston 44 37 314 89 484

Coffee 0 151 280 0 431

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 21% 

Service: 36%

Supplies and

Equipment: 42% 

Active Duty: 15%

Civilian: 48%

National 

Guard: 24%

Reserve: 13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

44%

8%

14%

34%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

72%

3%

18%

7%

$5.6

$8.5 $8.3 $7.7

$11.6 $11.7 $11.5 $12.2

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

A 

D 

E 

B 

C 

F 

I 

G 

H 

J 

K L M N O P Q 

10
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT 

The following information briefly describes the statistics listed in the state profiles throughout this report. A listing of 

military installations by state and county can be found in appendix 1. More detailed information on the methodology is 

included in appendix 2. 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

A 

B 

C 

D 

E 

Defense Contracts refers to U.S. Department of 

Defense (DoD) obligations through DoD-funded 

contracts during fiscal year (FY) 2021 (i.e., October 1, 

2020 through September 30, 2021). All contract data 

are from USAspending.gov and include prime awards 

the DoD made to private- and public-sector 

contractors, as well as sub-awards that prime-award 

recipients provided to subcontractors. 

Defense Contracts, By Type represents the 

proportions of total prime and sub-award obligations 

in a state that went to four product and service 

categories: construction; research and development; 

service; and supplies and equipment. The DoD’s 

Procurement and Acquisition Policy was used to 

categorize spending on the products and services 

identified by the product service code listed in each 

prime award record. 

Defense Contracts, By Service is the percentage of 

defense contract spending that was funded by the 

Military Services or Other Defense activities. This 

category includes the Office of the Secretary of 

Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Inspector General 

(DoD), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 

Defense Agencies, and the Defense Field Activities. 

These figures include prime awards and sub-awards 

since both records have fields that identify the federal 

agency that funded the award. 

Top Defense Contractors lists the private- and publicsector vendors that were among the ten largest 

recipients of DoD obligations in a state or the District 

of Columbia. These figures are adjusted to reflect the 

place of performance for prime and sub-awards (see 

appendix 2 for details).

Contract Awards Performed by Fiscal Year represents 

the total value of defense contract awards in a state 

or the District of Columbia for each fiscal year from FY 

2014 through FY 2021. These figures are adjusted to 

F 

G 

H 

I 

J 

reflect the place of performance for prime and 

sub-awards (see appendix 2 for details).

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Defense Personnel includes the total numbers of 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel in a state or the District of Columbia on 

September 30, 2021. Defense payroll figures are 

the total gross pay received by those personnel in 

FY 2021. The states and counties refer to the duty 

locations for active duty and civilian personnel. 

National Guard and Reserve personnel figures are 

based on assigned locations. These data are from the 

DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC). 

Allocations, By Type indicates the proportion of total 

defense personnel with an assigned or duty location 

in a state or the District of Columbia who were active 

duty, civilian, National Guard, or Reserve personnel on 

September 30, 2021. 

Allocations, By Service represents a snapshot of the 

proportion of total defense personnel across the 

Military Services and other DoD activities with an 

assigned or duty location in a state or the District of 

Columbia on September 30, 2021. 

Total Payroll and Personnel is the total gross pay 

during FY 2021 and count of all active duty, civilian, 

National Guard, and Reserve personnel with an 

assigned or duty location in a state or the District of 

Columbia on September 30, 2021. Pension payments 

and other benefits are not included in the payroll 

figure. 

Top Defense Personnel Locations lists the ten counties 

with the highest numbers of defense personnel 

reported on September 30, 2021. Personnel numbers 

are not disclosed—indicated by “ND”—for counties in 

which the numbers of active duty, civilian, or National 

Guard and Reserve personnel are less than ten to 

protect those individuals’ personally identifiable 

information. 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 11
12 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Madison

Calhoun

Jefferson

Lee

Montgomery

Coffee

Dale

Mobile Houston

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Madison

Jefferson

Talladega Tuscaloosa

Coffee

Dale

Baldwin

Mobile

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALABAMA 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Madison

Dale

Mobile

Montgomery

Calhoun

Baldwin

Jefferson

Coffee

Tuscaloosa

Talladega

(M = millions, B = billions)

$10.0 B

$752.2 M

$452.9 M

$256.9 M

$169.0 M

$82.3 M

$61.5 M

$56.1 M

$53.8 M

$49.3 M

Madison

Montgomery

Dale

Calhoun

Jefferson

Mobile

Coffee

Tuscaloosa

Lee

Houston

$1.7 B

$651.5 M

$448.4 M

$251.8 M

$181.0 M

$109.9 M

$21.4 M

$20.1 M

$14.5 M

$13.2 M

Calhoun

Tuscaloosa

Montgomery

R 

S 
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT 

K 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s SUMMARY BAR 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

$ Spent in State is the combined total of defense Columbia. 

L 

M 

N 

O 

P 

contract obligations and defense personnel spending 

in a state or the District of Columbia during FY 2021. 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia. 

% of State GDP represents the combined total of 

defense contract obligations and personnel spending 

as a proportion of a state or the District of Columbia’s 

GDP in FY 2021. The state’s GDP is the total value of 

all goods and services produced in a given fiscal year; 

these data are from the U.S. Department of 

Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis. The 

ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia. 

% of Total U.S. Defense Spending is the combined 

total of defense contract obligations and personnel 

spending in a state or the District of Columbia as a 

proportion of the DoD’s contract and personnel 

spending in all 50 states and the District of Columbia 

in FY 2021. 

$ per Resident highlights the combined total defense 

contract obligations and personnel spending in a 

state or the District of Columbia divided by the area’s 

overall population. These population figures are 

July 1, 2021 estimates provided by the U.S. Census 

Bureau. 

Contract Spending is the total amount of contracts 

the DoD obligats for products and services in a state 

or the District of Columbia during FY 2021. The 

ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia. 

Number of Personnel indicates the total number of 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel with an assigned or duty location in a state 

or the District of Columbia on September 30, 2021. 

Q 

R 

S 

Personnel Spending totals the gross pay received by 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel with an assigned or duty location in a state 

or the District of Columbia during FY 2021. This figure 

does not include pension payments or other benefits. 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia. 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Top Defense Contract Spending Locations lists and 

shows the ten counties (or independent cities) in a 

state with the highest defense contract obligations in 

FY 2021. For states with fewer than ten counties, all 

counties are identified. The District of Columbia is the 

only jurisdiction represented by a single location. 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Top Defense Personnel Spending Locations lists and 

shows the ten counties (or independent cities) within 

a state with the highest gross pay received by active 

duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve personnel 

during FY 2021. For states with fewer than ten 

counties, all counties are identified. The District of 

Columbia is the only jurisdiction represented by a 

single location. 

13
14 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

 

 

UNITED STATES 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Billions

$16.5 to $62.7

$9.5 to $15.7

$3.7 to $9.3

$1.9 to $3.6

$0.5 to $1.7

Percentage

4.1 to 10.2

2.3 to 3.4

1.6 to 2.3

1.1 to 1.5

0.5 to 1.1

Billions

$12.3 to $42.6

$6.3 to $12.2

$2.4 to $5.7

$1.2 to $2.1

$0.1 to $0.8

Total Spending

DC 

Total Spending as % of State GDP

DC 

Contract Spending

DC 

 Top 10 States by Total Spending 

(billions)

Virginia $62.7

California $57.4

Texas $47.3

New York $30.9

Florida $30.1

Maryland $26.3

Massachusetts $21.3

Connecticut $19.3

Washington $19.1

Pennsylvania $16.5

 Top 10 States by Total Spending

 as % of GDP

Virginia 10.2

Hawaii 8.3

District of Columbia 6.3

Connecticut 6.2

Alaska 6.2

Alabama 6.1

Maryland 5.8

Kentucky 5.7

Mississippi 4.3

Maine 4.1

Top 10 States by Contract Spending

(billions)

Virginia $42.6

California $40.2

Texas $35.1

New York $27.9

Florida $21.7

Massachusetts $20.1

Connecticut $18.4

Maryland $17.9

Pennsylvania $13.4

Arizona $12.3

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
 

UNITED STATES 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Billions

$4 to $20.1

$2.3 to $3.6

$1.4 to $2.2

$0.7 to $1.3

$0.2 to $0.6

DC 

Personnel Spending Top 10 States by Personnel Spending

 (billions)

Virginia $20.1

California $17.2

Texas $12.2

Florida $8.4

Maryland $8.3

North Carolina $7.6

Washington $7.4

Georgia $7.3

Hawaii $5.3

Colorado $4.0

Personnel Numbers Top 10 States by Personnel Numbers

(thousands)

California 278 

Virginia 251 

Texas 222 

North Carolina 143 

Florida 136

Georgia 132 

Washington 111 

Maryland 96

Hawaii 70 

South Carolina 67

Thousands

67 to 278

43 to 64

26 to 39

13 to 25

4 to 13

DC 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 15
16 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

$398.7 $380.4 $335.1 $296.0

$235.9 $250.3 $268.0

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

UNITED STATES 

$559.0 B 2.3% $1,684 $398.7 B 2.7 M $160.3 B

TOTAL SPENT OF GDP PER RESIDENT CONTRACT SPENDING NUMBER OF PERSONNEL PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 3% Development: 8%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 53% Service: 36%

By Service 

Army

26%

Navy/Marines

32%

Air Force

21%

Other Defense

21%

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 12%

National Active Duty: 43%

Guard: 16%

Civilian: 28%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

44%

Navy/Marines

29%

Air Force

23%

Other Defense

4%

Top Defense Contractors (B = billions)

Lockheed Martin $39.2 B

Boeing $23.6 B

Raytheon Technologies $21.4 B

General Dynamics $16.9 B

Northrop Grumman $15.0 B

Pfizer, Inc. $13.3 B

L3Harris Technologies $7.5 B

Humana $7.1 B

Huntington Ingalls $7.0 B

Moderna, Inc. $6.9 B

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$422.6

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$160.3 BILLION 2,679,442

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

San Diego, CA 81,174 24,341 853 8,279 114,647

Bexar, TX 33,185 23,250 2,922 9,472 68,829

Norfolk City, VA 49,686 17,140 303 1,078 68,207

Honolulu, HI 34,740 19,923 4,598 4,127 63,388

Cumberland, NC 48,406 10,663 657 2,188 61,914

El Paso, CO 34,419 9,103 1,072 4,758 49,352

Pierce, WA 31,246 7,159 3,009 5,269 46,683

Onslow, NC 36,990 4,002 118 561 41,671

Bell, TX 33,766 5,303 707 861 40,637

El Paso, TX 26,023 3,958 1,136 1,931 33,048
(M=millions) (M=millions)

UNITED STATES FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Pierce

El Paso

Fairfax

District of Columbia

Norfolk City

Cumberland Bell

Bexar

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

King

New London Middlesex

Fairfax

St. Louis

Madison

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (B = billions) 

Fairfax, VA

New York, NY

Middlesex, MA

Tarrant, TX

San Diego, CA

Los Angeles, CA

Madison, AL

New London, CT

St. Louis, MO

King, WA

(B = billions) 

$17.5 B 

$13.8 B 

$13.5 B 

$12.0 B 

$10.5 B 

$10.0 B 

$10.0 B 

$8.9 B 

$8.8 B 

$8.5 B 

San Diego, CA

Norfolk City, VA

Honolulu, HI

Bexar, TX

Cumberland, NC

El Paso, CO

Pierce, WA

District of Columbia

Bell, TX

Fairfax, VA

$7.2 B 

$4.9 B 

$4.8 B 

$4.3 B 

$4.2 B 

$3.3 B 

$2.9 B 

$2.6 B 

$2.4 B 

$2.3 B 

Honolulu

San Diego

Los Angeles

San Diego

Tarrant 

New York

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 17
18 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

ALABAMA 

#11

$15.7 B SPENT IN 

#6

6.1% OF STATE GDP

2.8%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$3,123

PER RESIDENT 

#11

$12.2 B CONTRACT 

#18

51,606 NUMBER OF 

#12

$3.5 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 21%

Supplies and

Equipment: 42% 

Service: 36%

By Service 

Army

44%

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

14%

Other Defense

34%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 13% Active Duty: 15%

National 

Guard: 24%

Civilian: 48%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

72%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

18%

Other Defense

7%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Boeing $2.1 B

Northrop Grumman $804.6 M

SAIC $590.4 M

M1 Support Services $500.6 M

Torch Technologies $430.2 M

Lockheed Martin $389.9 M

University of Alabama Huntsville Foundation $359.3 M

Defense Systems and Solutions $305.0 M

Austal $278.8 M

Intuitive Research & Technology Corp. $275.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$12.2 $11.6 $11.7 $11.5

$8.5 $8.3

FY15 FY16

$7.7

$5.6

FY14 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$3.5 BILLION 51,606

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Madison 715 13,888 454 726 15,783

Montgomery 2,722 3,323 2,692 2,173 10,910

Dale 3,663 2,242 37 151 6,093

Calhoun 39 3,551 923 328 4,841

Jefferson 329 394 2,000 1,640 4,363

Mobile 50 796 813 761 2,420

Tuscaloosa 16 88 279 289 672

Lee 56 21 128 325 530 

Houston 44 37 314 89 484 

Coffee 0 151 280 0 431 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 19

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Madison

Calhoun

Jefferson

Lee

Montgomery

Coffee

Dale

Mobile Houston

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Madison

Jefferson

Talladega Tuscaloosa

Coffee

Dale

Baldwin

Mobile

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Madison

Dale

Mobile

Montgomery

Calhoun

Baldwin

Jefferson

Coffee

Tuscaloosa

Talladega

(M = millions, B = billions)

$10.0 B

$752.2 M

$452.9 M

$256.9 M

$169.0 M

$82.3 M

$61.5 M

$56.1 M

$53.8 M

$49.3 M

Madison

Montgomery

Dale

Calhoun

Jefferson

Mobile

Coffee

Tuscaloosa

Lee

Houston

$1.7 B

$651.5 M

$448.4 M

$251.8 M

$181.0 M

$109.9 M

$21.4 M

$20.1 M

$14.5 M

$13.2 M

Calhoun

Tuscaloosa

Montgomery

SCAL YEAR 2018 ALABAMA 
20 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

ALASKA 

#31

$3.6 B SPENT IN 

#5

6.2% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$4,916

PER RESIDENT 

#36

$1.7 B CONTRACT 

#27

29,193 NUMBER OF 

#24

$1.9 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Construction: 11%

Equipment: 15% Research and

Development: 4%

Service: 70%

By Service 

Army

41%

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

28%

Other Defense

23%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

National Reserve: 3%

Guard: 13%

Civilian: 19%

Active Duty: 65%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

51%

Navy/Marines

1%

Air Force

48%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Arctic Slope Regional Corp.

Doyon Limited

Indyne

ARCTEC Alaska, JV

Davis Constructors & Engineers, Inc.

Alaska Structures, Inc.

University of Alaska System

Tyonek Native Corp.

Bering Straits Native Corp.

Bauer AG

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.9 $1.7

FY19

$1.7

FY18

$1.5 $1.5 $1.5 $1.4

FY14 FY15

$1.3

FY16 FY17 FY20 FY21

$1.9 BILLION 29,193

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Anchorage

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Matanuska-Susitna

Denali

Kodiak Island

Juneau

Kenai Peninsula

Ketchikan Gateway

Bethel

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

9,808 3,338 2,554

8,970 1,846 669

19 318 196

ND ND 260

26 29 95 

17 20 ND 

ND ND ND 

0 ND ND 

0 ND ND 

0 ND 0 

(M = millions)

$233.1 M

$94.3 M

$62.1 M

$52.1 M

$45.6 M

$41.8 M

$39.0 M

$38.4 M

$38.3 M

$36.0 M

Reserve

769

82 

0 

ND 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Total

16,469

11,567

533 

ND 

150 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALASKA

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Juneau

Kodiak Island

Ketchikan Gateway

Kenai Peninsula

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Lake and Peninsula

Sitka

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

(K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

Anchorage

$871.9 M

Fairbanks North Star

$450.4 M

Southeast Fairbanks

$136.0 M

Denali

$103.3 M

Aleutians West

$62.5 M

Yukon-Koyukuk

$15.7 M

Matanuska-Susitna

$11.3 M

Aleutians East

$11.2 M

Lake and Peninsula

$6.6 M

Sitka

$6.6 M

Anchorage

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Denali

Matanuska-Susitna

Kodiak Island

Juneau

Kenai Peninsula

Ketchikan Gateway

Bethel

$1.1 B

$719.8 M

$46.4 M

$14.0 M

$5.4 M

$2.9 M

$812.0 K

$442.7 K

$352.5 K

$14.5 K

Yukon-Koyukuk

Denali

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Matanuska-Susitna

Anchorage

Aleutians West

Aleutians East

Denali

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Matanuska-Susitna

Bethel Anchorage

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 21

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
22 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

ARIZONA 

#13

$14.6 B SPENT IN 

#11

3.4% OF STATE GDP

2.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,013

PER RESIDENT 

#10

$12.3 B CONTRACT 

#19

44,233 NUMBER OF 

#20

$2.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 1%

Development: 10%

Service: 18%

Supplies and

Equipment: 71%

By Service 

Army

28%

Navy/Marines

27%

Air Force

26%

Other Defense

19%

Top Defense Contractors 

Raytheon Technologies

Northrop Grumman

Boeing

Honeywell

General Dynamics

Iridium Government Services LLC

Trax International

Jacobs

Patriarch Partners

SEWP Solutions

(M = millions, B = billions)

$6.2 B

$1.3 B

$1.2 B

$905.9 M

$394.1 M

$200.4 M

$108.8 M

$97.8 M

$61.1 M

$59.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$15.7

$13.4

FY18

$12.3 $11.6 $10.4

$8.1 $6.7

FY14

$5.4

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY19 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$2.3 BILLION 44,233

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 17%

National 

Guard: 18%

Active Duty: 43%

Civilian: 22%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

13%

Air Force

Other Defense

3%

Reserve

5,365

1,609

186

30 

442 

ND 

ND 

0 

0 

0 

Total

16,779

13,366

7,046

4,609

1,334

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

39%

45%

County

Maricopa

Pima

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Coconino

Yavapai

Graham

Navajo

La Paz

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

5,207 2,554 3,653

6,299 2,932 2,526

4,072 2,664 124 

3,238 1,278 63

0 152 740 

11 50 413 

13 ND 199 

0 0 39 

0 ND 33 

0 ND 0 

39 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

ARIZONA 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Navajo

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Coconino

Mohave

Yavapai

Maricopa

Pinal Graham

Pima Cochise

Santa Cruz

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

Pima

Maricopa

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Yavapai

Santa Cruz

Coconino

Graham

Mohave

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$6.6 B

$4.7 B

$758.3 M

$250.0 M

$12.5 M

$4.4 M

$4.3 M

$2.9 M

$1.5 M

$664.8 K

Maricopa

Pima

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Coconino

Yavapai

Navajo

Graham

Mohave

$788.4 M

$764.6 M

$473.8 M

$246.0 M

$35.2 M

$16.6 M

$6.6 M

$1.2 M

$730.4 K

$124.3 K

Coconino

Mohave

Yavapai

Maricopa

Yuma Pinal Graham

Pima Cochise

Yuma

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 23

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
24 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

ARKANSAS 

#40

$1.9 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#38 

1.3% OF STATE GDP

0.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$639

PER RESIDENT 

#40

$1.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#35

18,531 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#38 

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 5% 

Supplies and

Equipment: 85%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

4%

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

6%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 12%

National 

Guard: 47%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

59%

Navy/Marines

2%

Air Force

38%

Other Defense

1%

Research and

Development: 1% 

Service: 8%

75%

Active Duty: 21%

Civilian: 20%

Top Defense Contractors 

Aerojet Rocketdyne

Lockheed Martin

General Dynamics

LS Black Constructors/Loeffel Construction, JV

TransDigm Group

Ducommun

Reliable Contracting Group

Kimball & Thompson Produce Co.

HGL Construction, Inc.

National Presto Industries

(M = millions)

$591.3 M

$180.9 M

$120.6 M

$28.1 M

$20.8 M

$20.6 M

$15.4 M

$9.3 M

$8.1 M

$7.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.2

$0.7 $0.6 $0.6

FY14 FY15

$0.4 $0.3

FY18 FY19

$0.3

FY16

$0.2

FY17 FY20 FY21

$768.1 MILLION 18,531

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Pulaski 3,678 2,039 3,143

Sebastian 35 338 1,371

Benton 0 44 674

Jefferson ND 724 136

Washington 15 ND 334 

Craighead ND 21 256

Faulkner ND 33 75 

Pope ND 58 126

Union ND ND 70 

Garland ND 66 19 

Reserve

1,502

107 

161

0 

ND 

65

160

14 

123 

77 

Total

10,362

1,851

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

879 
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ARKANSAS 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Baxter

Craighead

Pope

Pulaski

Garland

Jefferson

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Benton Carroll

Pulaski

Jefferson

Ouachita

Calhoun

Columbia

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Ouachita

Calhoun

Pulaski

Jefferson

Benton

Washington

Madison

Carroll

Columbia

Sebastian

(M = millions)

$626.4 M

$296.2 M

$132.0 M

$19.6 M

$14.9 M

$14.5 M

$11.6 M

$9.0 M 

$8.6 M

$7.3 M 

Pulaski

Sebastian

Jefferson

Benton

Faulkner

Washington

Craighead

Garland

Pope

Baxter

$510.1 M

$65.6 M

$53.0 M

$20.7 M

$12.6 M

$10.5 M

$7.0 M 

$6.9 M

$6.6 M

$5.3 M

Washington Madison

Sebastian

Benton

Sebastian

Washington

Faulkner

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 2

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

5
26 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

CALIFORNIA 

#2

$57.4 B SPENT IN 

#29

1.6% OF STATE GDP

10.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,463

PER RESIDENT 

#2

$40.2 B CONTRACT 

#1

277,943 NUMBER 

#2

$17.2 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 5% Research and

Development: 14%

Supplies and

Equipment: 35%

Service: 47%

By Service 

Army

13%

Navy/Marines

36%

Air Force

32%

Other Defense

19%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 13%

National 

Guard: 7%

Civilian: 24% Active Duty: 57%

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Allocations, By Service 

Army

17%

Navy/Marines

66%

Air Force

15%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Northrop Grumman

Centene Corp.

Boeing

Lockheed Martin

Raytheon Technologies

General Atomics

Aerospace Corp.

General Dynamics

SpaceX

Aqua-Chem, Inc.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$4.5 B

$3.2 B

$3.0 B

$2.5 B

$2.5 B

$2.0 B

$1.0 B

$571.2 M

$555.9 M

$379.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$44.9 $44.6

FY19 FY20

$39.8 $40.2 $35.5 $30.3 $31.7 $29.9

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY21

$17.2 BILLION 277,943

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL

County

San Diego

San Bernardino

Los Angeles

Ventura

Solano

Kern

Monterey

Riverside

Kings

Orange

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

81,174 24,341 853 

12,880

1,954

4,594

6,863

2,666

4,989

436

6,995

485 

3,300 853 

3,506 3,143

6,024 1,205

1,714 270 

8,686 213 

4,033 73 

2,944 1,277

888 0 

1,132 2,288

Reserve

8,279

374 

4,635

1,230

3,338

327 

413 

4,830

454 

3,404

Total

114,647

17,407

13,238

13,053

12,185

11,892

9,508

9,487

8,337

7,309
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

CALIFORNIA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Kern

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

San Bernardino

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

San Diego

Los Angeles

Orange

Santa Clara

Sacramento

Kern

Ventura

Alameda

San Bernardino

Monterey

(M = millions, B = billions)

$10.5 B

$10.0 B

$4.2 B

$4.0 B

$3.6 B

$1.4 B

$1.1 B

$841.0 M

$682.2 M

$605.2 M

San Diego

Ventura

Kern

San Bernardino

Solano

Los Angeles

Monterey

Kings

Riverside

Yuba

$7.2 B

$1.0 B

$1.0 B

$846.2 M

$756.3 M

$742.2 M

$741.5 M

$506.5 M

$469.4 M

$385.8 M

Sacramento

Alameda

Santa Clara

Monterey

Kern

San Diego

Los Angeles

Ventura

Orange

Monterey

San Diego

Los Angeles

Ventura

Kings

San Bernardino

Riverside

Yuba

Solano

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 2

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

7
28 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

COLORADO 

#15

$12.4 B SPENT IN 

#16

2.8% OF STATE GDP

2.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,138

PER RESIDENT 

#15

$8.4 B CONTRACT 

#11

64,103 NUMBER OF 

#10

$4.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 5% Research and Supplies and Development: 27% Equipment: 19%

Service: 48%

By Service 

Army

16%

Navy/Marines

12%

Air Force

57%

Other Defense

15%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 14%

National 

Guard: 9%

Civilian: 19%

Active Duty: 59%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

62%

Navy/Marines

4%

Air Force

32%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Lockheed Martin

United Launch Alliance

Sierra Nevada Corp.

Raytheon Technologies

L3Harris Technologies

Jacobs

Bechtel Group

Peraton Corp.

Ball Corp.

M.C. Dean, Inc.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.3 B

$632.9 M

$463.7 M

$389.0 M

$362.8 M

$280.2 M

$274.2 M

$190.3 M

$166.4 M

$159.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$8.4 $7.6 $6.7 $6.3 $5.8 $5.8

FY14

$5.1 $4.8

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$4.0 BILLION 64,103

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

El Paso 34,419 9,103 1,072

Arapahoe 2,561 1,459 2,470

Denver 382 287 457 

Adams ND 99 337 

Weld ND 102 633

Jefferson 58 231 0 

Pueblo 15 426 152 

Boulder 83 62 79 

Montrose 0 0 138 

Mesa 19 22 93 

Reserve Total

4,758 49,352

1,789 8,279

572 1,698

1,012 ND 

128 ND 

425 714 

0 593 

ND ND 

0 138 

0 134 
(M=millions)

COLORADO FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

El Paso

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

El Paso

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

El Paso

Douglas

Arapahoe

Boulder

Pueblo

Adams

Jefferson

Denver

Larimer

Broomfield

(M = millions, B = billions)

$3.1 B

$1.9 B

$1.7 B

$311.7 M

$308.5 M

$230.3 M

$209.5 M

$209.4 M

$197.0 M

$102.0 M

El Paso

Arapahoe

Denver

Adams

Jefferson

Pueblo

Weld

Boulder

Douglas

Larimer

$3.3 B 

$453.5 M

$86.5 M

$48.7 M

$39.3 M 

$35.9 M

$29.7 M

$13.2 M

$8.6 M

$6.0 M

Adams

Arapahoe

Larimer

Boulder 

Broomfield

Pueblo

Denver

Jefferson

Douglas

Weld

Adams

Arapahoe

Pueblo

Boulder

Douglas

Larimer

Denver

Jefferson

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 29

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
30 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

CONNECTICUT 

#8 

$19.3 B SPENT IN 

#4

6.2% OF STATE GDP

3.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$5,347

PER RESIDENT 

#7 

$18.4 B CONTRACT 

#38 

15,939 NUMBER OF 

#36

$0.9 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and 

Construction: 0% Development: 6%

Service: 8%

Supplies and

Equipment: 86%

By Service 

Army

8%

Navy/Marines

73%

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

3%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 12%

Active Duty: 40%

National 

Guard: 30%

Civilian: 18%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

36%

Navy/Marines

52%

Air Force

9%

Other Defense

4%

Top Defense Contractors 

General Dynamics

Lockheed Martin

Raytheon Technologies

MB Aerospace East Granby LP

Sonalysts

Murray Benjamin Electric Co. LP

Gartner

Kaman Corp.

Emprise Corp.

Hartford Provision Co.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$8.7 B

$4.7 B

$3.9 B

$46.4 M

$45.5 M

$44.8 M

$43.9 M

$39.7 M

$38.0 M

$34.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$22.7

$18.8

FY20

$18.4

$14.8 $13.1 $11.8 $12.4

FY14 FY15

$8.4

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY21

$875.2 MILLION 15,939

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

New London 4,451 1,590 1,096 360 7,497

Hartford 87 843 2,216 537 3,683

Middlesex ND 77 610 416 ND 

New Haven 75 70 501 267 913 

Fairfield 12 198 245 329 784

Tolland 46 ND 36 0 ND 

Litchfield 0 14 0 0 14 

Windham 0 ND 0 0 ND 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

CONNECTICUT FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

New London

Fairfield

Hartford

New Haven

Middlesex

Tolland

Litchfield

Windham

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$8.9 B 

$5.0 B

$4.2 B

$153.0 M

$50.5 M

$41.6 M

$14.7 M

$4.1 M

New London

Hartford

New Haven

Middlesex

Fairfield

Tolland

Litchfield

Windham

$457.2 M

$165.7 M

$38.4 M

$37.4 M

$36.9 M

$4.1 M

$850.5 K

$546.3 K

Litchfield

Hartford

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven

Litchfield

Hartford

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 3

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

1
32 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

DELAWARE 

#44

$1.0 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#40

1.1% OF STATE GDP

0.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$947

PER RESIDENT 

#45

$0.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#45

10,303 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#43

$0.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 1% Development: 9%

Service: 20%

Supplies and

Equipment: 69%

By Service 

Army

65%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

20%

Other Defense

12%

Top Defense Contractors 

AstraZeneca PLC

SNA International

Custom Mechanical Systems Corp.

Phase Sensitive Innovations

Caesar Rodney School District

Frontier Technologies, Inc.

Transcontinental Airways Corp.

Greenwich Aerogroup, Inc.

Benaka, Inc.

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.

(M = millions)

$287.1 M

$19.9 M

$17.0 M

$12.2 M

$10.2 M

$9.1 M

$7.5 M

$7.1 M

$6.8 M

$5.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.5

$0.4 $0.4

FY14

$0.3

FY15

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2

$0.1

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 23%

Active Duty: 35%

National 

Guard: 26%

Civilian: 15%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

25%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

71%

Other Defense

1%

$476.2 MILLION 10,303

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Kent

New Castle

Sussex

Active

Duty

3,567

44 

0 

Civilian

1,058

448 

29 

National

Guard

149 

2,063

514 

Reserve

1,759

602

58 

Total

6,533

3,157

601
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

(M = millions)

$374.5 M

$93.2 M

$5.8 M

Kent

New Castle

Sussex

$342.7 M

$118.6 M

$13.7 M

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 3

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

3

DELAWARE 
34 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

#19 #3 1.8% $14,614 #18 #29 #18

$9.8 B SPENT IN 6.3% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $7.1 B CONTRACT 26,234 NUMBER OF $2.7 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 1% Development: 5%

Supplies and

Equipment: 23%

Service: 71%

By Service 

Army

14%

Navy/Marines

52%

Air Force

12%

Other Defense

22%

Top Defense Contractors 

Government of the United States

Booz Allen Hamilton

Dell

Deloitte

Leidos

Huntington Ingalls

Ernst & Young

Advantaged Solutions

SAIC

CACI

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.1 B

$468.7 M

$329.2 M

$269.7 M

$219.2 M

$215.0 M

$147.4 M

$140.0 M

$135.3 M

$116.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$7.1

$4.9 $5.1

FY18

$4.1 $4.0 $4.2 $4.2 $3.9

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY19 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

National Reserve: 5%

Guard: 9% 

Active Duty: 34%

Civilian: 52%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

18%

Navy/Marines

61%

Air Force

17%

Other Defense

3%

$2.7 BILLION 26,234

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

District of Columbia 8,926 13,620 2,402 1,286 26,234
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚŽĨŽůƵŵďŝĂ

;сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

Ψϳ͘ϭ

ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚŽĨŽůƵŵďŝĂ

ΨϮ͘ς

ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚŽĨŽůƵŵďŝĂ

ŝƐƚƌŝĐƚŽĨŽůƵŵďŝĂ

&ĐƚŝǀĞ&'ƵĂƌĚ&ZĞƐĞƌǀĞƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞDĐƚŝǀĞEĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞt,^

FISCAL YEAR 2018

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

FISCAL YEAR 2018 F ISCAL YEAR 2018 S CAL YEAR 2 0 1 8

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϮϭ ϯρ

FISCAL YEAR 2021 
36 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

FLORIDA 

#5

$30.1 B SPENT IN 

#20

2.3% OF STATE GDP

5.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,384

PER RESIDENT 

#5

$21.7 B CONTRACT 

#5

135,855 NUMBER 

#4

$8.4 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 3% Development: 6%

Service: 35%

Supplies and

Equipment: 56%

By Service 

Army

13%

Navy/Marines

40%

Air Force

24%

Other Defense

22%

Top Defense Contractors 

Lockheed Martin

Abbott Laboratories

Northrop Grumman

L3Harris Technologies

Leonardo SpA

Crowley

Raytheon Technologies

General Dynamics

Jacobs

Sierra Nevada Corp.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$6.3 B

$1.7 B

$1.4 B

$476.9 M

$435.7 M

$413.2 M

$368.6 M

$359.3 M

$273.2 M

$204.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$22.1 $21.7

$18.8

$15.2 $15.5 $14.2

$9.6 $9.7

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 18%

National 

Guard: 9%

Active Duty: 47%

Civilian: 25%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

23%

Navy/Marines

41%

Air Force

34%

Other Defense

2%

$ 8.4 BILLION 135,855

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Okaloosa 18,720 7,677 121 2,448 28,966

Duval 13,598 9,092 1,988 4,073 28,751

Escambia 12,274 2,584 179 1,004 16,041

Hillsborough 5,922 2,894 479 4,498 13,793

Miami-Dade 1,129 1,361 323 3,790 6,603

Bay 2,652 3,006 539 237 6,434

Orange 269 2,471 362 3,101 6,203

Brevard 1,628 2,594 388 1,352 5,962

Pinellas 78 361 802 1,025 2,266

Palm Beach 73 237 388 1,103 1,801
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

 

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FLORIDA 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Orange

Brevard

Hillsborough

Duval

Okaloosa

Pinellas

Bay

Miami-Dade

Escambia

Broward

(M = millions, B = billions)

$7.7 B 

$4.5 B 

$2.0 B 

$1.7 B 

$1.7 B 

$767.6 M 

$698.2 M 

$479.3 M 

$467.4 M 

$240.4 M 

Okaloosa

Duval

Hillsborough

Escambia

Bay

Brevard

Orange

Miami-Dade

Santa Rosa

Monroe

$2.1 B 

$1.9 B 

$926.4 M 

$754.1 M 

$502.6 M 

$395.7 M 

$360.7 M 

$356.0 M 

$129.7 M 

$106.1 M 

Bay

Escambia Okaloosa

Santa Rosa

Duval

Orange

Brevard

Hillsborough

Miami-Dade

Monroe

Bay

Duval

Orange

Brevard Pinellas

Hillsborough

Broward

Miami-Dade

Escambia Okaloosa

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 37
38 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

GEORGIA 

#12

$14.9 B SPENT IN 

#24

2.1% OF STATE GDP

2.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,378

PER RESIDENT 

#16

$7.6 B CONTRACT 

#6

132,311 NUMBER 

#8 

$7.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction:6% Research and

Development: 7%

Supplies and

Equipment: 44%

Service: 43%

By Service 

Army

24%

Navy/Marines

29%

Air Force

37%

Other Defense

10%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 10%

National

Guard: 11%

Active Duty: 52% Civilian: 27%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

64%

Navy/Marines

11%

Air Force

23%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Lockheed Martin

Georgia Tech Research Corp.

Alberici-Mortenson, JV

International Auto Logistics

Northrop Grumman

J. Walter Thompson

ACC Construction

Showa Glove Co.

Envistacom

Scientific Research Corp.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.3 B

$489.4 M

$369.9 M

$157.9 M

$133.4 M

$109.5 M

$95.3 M

$81.3 M

$73.9 M

$73.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$9.7

FY14 FY16

$8.3

FY15 FY17 FY20

$7.6 $6.5 $6.8 $6.8 $6.1 $5.3

FY18 FY19 FY21

$7.3 BILLION 132,311

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Muscogee

Houston

Liberty

Richmond

Chatham

Cobb

Lowndes

Camden

Clayton

Dougherty

Active Civilian

Duty

22,233

3,503

16,292

11,400

4,549

277 

4,464

2,477

49 

326

4,494

15,115

2,584

3,552

1,184

1,361

550 

2,483

524 

2,066

National

Guard

405 

1,269

577 

596

1,736

2,753

68

0 

477 

107 

Reserve

646

1,385

146

1,526

456

3,403

258 

ND 

2,345

118 

Total

27,778

21,272

19,599

17,074

7,925

7,794

5,340

ND 

3,395

2,617
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

GEORGIA 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Cobb

Fulton

Houston

Camden

Richmond

Chattahoochee

Chatham

Glynn

Gwinnett

Liberty

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.5 B

$1.0 B

$818.3 M

$623.0 M

$494.3 M

$312.0 M

$257.7 M

$224.5 M

$200.0 M

$129.7 M

Houston

Muscogee

Liberty

Richmond

Chatham

Cobb

Camden

Lowndes

Dougherty

Clayton

$1.5 B

$1.3 B

$1.1 B

$1.1 B

$431.7 M

$347.3 M

$334.2 M

$307.8 M 

$174.4 M

$139.1 M

Chattahoochee

Fulton

Cobb Gwinnett

Richmond

Houston

Liberty

Glynn

Chatham

Camden

Clayton

Muscogee

Lowndes

Cobb

Richmond

Houston

Chatham

Camden

Liberty

Dougherty

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 39

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
40 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

HAWAII 

#22

$7.9 B SPENT IN 

#2

8.3% OF STATE GDP

1.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$5,465

PER RESIDENT 

#29

$2.6 B CONTRACT 

#9 

70,484 NUMBER OF 

#9 

$5.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Equipment: 7% Construction: 15%

Research and Service: 71%

Development: 6%

By Service 

Army

29%

Navy/Marines

50%

Air Force

8%

Other Defense

12%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 6%

National Guard: 8%

Civilian: 29%

Active Duty: 57%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

37%

Navy/Marines

47%

Air Force

14%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Hensel Phelps Construction

Smartronix

Vigor Industrial

MNDPI Pacific, JV

TNT Constructors

PCL U.S. Holdings, Inc.

Koa Lani, JV LLC

Portico Services LLC

AECOM

Matson

(M = millions)

$212.7 M

$107.8 M

$81.1 M

$69.3 M

$58.5 M

$50.6 M

$45.6 M

$43.7 M

$40.5 M

$40.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.7 $2.6 $2.4 $2.2 $1.9 $2.0 $1.9 $1.8

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$5.3 BILLION 70,484

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Honolulu 34,740 19,923 4,598 4,127 63,388

Hawaii ND 186 405 74 ND 

Kauai 85 185 150 43 463

Maui 26 67 207 0 300 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

HAWAII 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Honolulu

Kauai

Hawaii

Maui

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.4 B

$95.7 M

$35.3 M

$33.3 M 

Honolulu

Kauai

Hawaii

Maui

$4.8 B

$35.0 M

$31.9 M

$17.8 M

Kauai

Honolulu

Maui

Hawaii

Kauai

Honolulu

Maui

Hawaii

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 41

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
42 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

IDAHO 

#47

$0.7 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#49

0.7% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$356

PER RESIDENT 

#50

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#44

10,753 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#44

$0.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 2% Development: 6%

Supplies and

Equipment: 45%

Service: 46%

By Service 

Army

7%

Navy/Marines

15%

Air Force

44%

Other Defense

34%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 8%

Active Duty: 34%

National 

Guard: 43%

Civilian: 16%

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Allocations, By Service 

Army

44%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

52%

Other Defense

0%

Top Defense Contractors 

Brad Hall & Associates

PKL Services

Bering Sea Environmental LLC

Lightforce

Tanadgusix Corp.

AERO Specialties

Milpower

Northcon, Inc.

General Dynamics

Power Engineers

(M = millions)

$45.3 M

$12.8 M

$10.0 M

$9.1 M

$8.6 M

$8.0 M

$7.3 M

$6.9 M

$6.4 M

$6.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.3

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2

FY18 FY19 FY20

$0.2 $0.2

FY14 FY15

$0.1

FY16 FY17 FY21

$470.0 MILLION 10,753

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

County

Ada

Elmore

Kootenai

Bannock

Canyon

Twin Falls

Bonneville

Jerome

Clearwater

Cassia

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

75 971 2,856

3,455 467 214 

0 73 206

ND 11 224 

ND ND 258 

ND ND 92 

21 17 105 

0 ND 128 

16 55 22 

0 0 77 

Reserve

559 

30 

90 

113 

0 

65

0 

0 

0 

0 

Total

4,461

4,166

369

ND 

ND 

ND 

143 

ND 

93 

77 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

IDAHO 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Elmore

Bonneville

Ada

Kootenai

Clearwater

Canyon

Blaine

Bingham

Bannock

Latah

(M = millions)

$76.3 M

$50.1 M

$35.5 M

$10.2 M

$10.1 M

$7.2 M

$6.4 M

$5.9 M

$1.3 M

$567.6 K

Elmore

Ada

Kootenai

Bannock

Canyon

Clearwater

Bonneville

Twin Falls

Bonner

Latah

$248.1 M

$158.3 M

$12.3 M

$8.4 M

$7.2 M

$5.7 M

$5.6 M

$3.5 M

$3.5 M

$3.0 M 

Clearwater

KootenaiKootenai

Elmore

Canyon

Ada

Blaine

Bonneville

Bannock

Bingham

Latah

Kootenai

Latah Clearwater

Bonner

Elmore

Canyon

Ada

Twin Falls

Bonneville

Bannock

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 43

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
44 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

ILLINOIS 

#20

$9.5 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#46

1.0% OF STATE GDP

1.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$749

PER RESIDENT 

#19

$7.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#15

58,960 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#19

$2.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 2% Development: 3% 

Service: 34%

Supplies and

Equipment: 62%

By Service 

Army

20%

Navy/Marines

15%

Air Force

26%

Other Defense

40%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 19%

Active Duty: 36%

National 

Guard: 23%

Civilian: 22%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

42%

Navy/Marines

36%

Air Force

20%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Northrop Grumman

BP

Cardinal Health

W.S. Darley & Co.

Omnicom Group, Inc.

SupplyCore

Patriot Team

DMS Pharmaceutical

FedEx

General Dynamics

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.1 B

$591.2 M

$517.9 M

$426.9 M

$329.1 M

$250.8 M

$245.9 M

$240.3 M

$238.3 M

$151.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$7.5

FY18

$6.7 $7.0 $7.0

$5.8 $5.2 $5.4

$3.9

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY19 FY20 FY21

$2.5 BILLION 58,960

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Lake

St. Clair

Rock Island

Cook

Sangamon

Peoria

Will

DuPage

Champaign

Winnebago

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

15,816 1,548 213 

4,582 4,206 1,076

365 4,333 381 

349 741 2,311

54 555 2,151

45 385 1,773

11 78 97 

115 142 0 

24 319 276

26 30 424 

Reserve Total

4,412 21,989

1,711 11,575

431 5,510

1,868 5,269

ND ND 

483 2,686

614 800 

463 720 

87 706

199 679
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

 

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

ILLINOIS 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Cook

St. Clair

Lake

DuPage

Winnebago

Williamson

Peoria

Rock Island

Madison

McHenry

(M = millions)

$3.0 B 

$1.3 B

$964.2 M

$744.3 M

$356.2 M

$141.4 M

$127.8 M

$98.4 M

$32.9 M

$30.5 M

St. Clair

Lake

Rock Island

Cook

Sangamon

Peoria

DuPage

Champaign

Macon

Will

$805.6 M

$605.5 M

$421.0 M

$189.5 M

$117.8 M

$88.5 M

$37.4 M

$37.3 M 

$16.1 M

$14.7 M

Lake

Cook

DuPage Rock Island

Peoria

Winnebago McHenry

St. Clair

Williamson

Madison

Lake

Cook

DuPage Rock Island

Peoria

Champaign

St. Clair

Sangamon Macon

Will

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 45

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
46 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

INDIANA 

#23

$7.2 B SPENT IN 

#28

1.6% OF STATE GDP

1.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,059

PER RESIDENT 

#21

$5.7 B CONTRACT 

#26

31,044 NUMBER OF 

#28

$1.5 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Development: 6% Construction: 0%

Service: 18%

Supplies and

Equipment: 76%

By Service 

Army

48%

Navy/Marines

27%

Air Force

15%

Other Defense

10%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 3% Reserve: 17%

Civilian: 39%

National 

Guard: 41%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

53%

Navy/Marines

19%

Air Force

14%

Other Defense

14%

Top Defense Contractors 

Eli Lilly and Co.

Rolls-Royce

Raytheon Technologies

AM General

ERAPSCO

SAIC

AmeriQual Group

ManTech TSG-2, JV

Calumet Shreveport Fuels

Allison Transmission

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.9 B

$1.0 B

$469.1 M

$326.6 M

$171.2 M

$144.8 M

$138.0 M

$85.2 M

$67.7 M

$63.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$5.7

$4.0

FY19

$3.6 $3.2 $3.0 $3.0 $3.1

$2.3

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY20 FY21

$1.5 BILLION 31,044

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Marion 337 5,481 2,368

Martin 69 4,986 0 

Johnson 333 245 1,435

Miami 18 535 29 

Allen 39 251 1,411

Vigo 23 155 944 

Lake ND 64 452 

St. Joseph 74 57 265

Tippecanoe 59 30 396

Vanderburgh 32 31 371 

Reserve

1,388

0 

359 

1,721

335 

159 

173 

288 

120 

148 

Total

9,574

5,055

2,372

2,303

2,036

1,281

ND 

684

605

582 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Johnson

Lawrence

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Marion

Martin

St. Joseph

Allen

Whitley

Vanderburgh

Daviess

Bartholomew

Lawrence

Johnson

(M = millions)

$3.5 B

$503.7 M

$459.5 M

$286.7 M

$185.0 M

$147.3 M

$54.7 M

$43.0 M

$37.2 M

$37.2 M

Marion

Martin

Johnson

Miami

Allen

Vigo

St. Joseph

Tippecanoe

Lake

Shelby

$584.1 M

$453.7 M

$92.9 M

$74.8 M

$65.0 M

$42.9 M

$20.6 M

$20.2 M

$19.2 M

$16.3 M

Whitley

Allen

St. Joseph

Marion

Bartholomew

Martin Daviess

Vanderburgh

St. Joseph

Allen

Lake

Tippecanoe

Miami

Marion

Martin

Shelby

Johnson

Vigo

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 4

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

7

INDIANA 
48 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

IOWA 

#37 

$2.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#39 

1.1% OF STATE GDP

0.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$805

PER RESIDENT 

#31

$2.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#40

13,155 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#45

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 1% Development: 4%

Service: 15%

Supplies and

Equipment: 79%

By Service 

Army

20%

Navy/Marines

52%

Air Force

23%

Other Defense

5%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 2%

Reserve: 16% Civilian: 14%

National Guard: 68%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

79%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

18%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Raytheon Technologies

BAE Systems/Raytheon Technologies

Lockheed Martin

American Ordnance

Eaton Corp.

BAE Systems

Dexter Apache Holdings, Inc.

AI Convoy Holdco Limited

Alliant Techsystems Operations

Carver Pump Co.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.1 B

$310.0 M

$199.0 M

$120.0 M

$38.1 M

$35.5 M

$30.4 M

$26.1 M

$19.3 M

$18.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.5 $2.2

FY20

$2.1 $2.0

$1.6

$1.2 $1.2 $1.2

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY21

$444.3 MILLION 13,155

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Polk 102 787 3,281

Woodbury ND 284 1,140

Scott ND 189 451 

Linn ND 115 305 

Black Hawk 29 72 369

Johnson 44 32 418 

Boone 0 65 420 

Dallas ND 0 80 

Pottawattamie 0 17 236

Dubuque ND 32 148 

Reserve Total

757 4,927

62 ND 

301 ND 

354 ND 

87 557 

ND ND 

0 485 

254 ND 

66 319 

123 ND 
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 IOWA

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Linn

Des Moines

Scott

Polk

Johnson

Muscatine

Pottawattamie

Woodbury

Fremont

Union

(M = millions)

$1.7 B

$152.6 M

$103.1 M

$44.2 M

$37.5 M

$31.9 M

$15.5 M

$12.0 M

$11.0 M

$9.7 M 

Polk

Woodbury

Scott

Linn

Boone

Black Hawk

Johnson

Dubuque

Webster

Pottawattamie

$190.1 M

$52.1 M

$31.2 M

$25.2 M

$19.8 M

$17.2 M

$17.2 M

$9.1 M

$8.5 M

$7.2 M

Pottawattamie

Fremont

Union

Linn

Johnson Scott

Muscatine

Des Moines

Polk

Woodbury

Woodbury

Pottawattamie

Webster

Boone

Polk

Dubuque Black Hawk

Linn

Johnson Scott

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 49

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
50 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

KANSAS 

#30 

$3.7 B SPENT IN 

#26

1.9% OF STATE GDP

0.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,263

PER RESIDENT 

#38 

$1.5 B CONTRACT 

#21

39,055 NUMBER OF 

#21

$2.2 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 16%

Research and

Development: 3%

Supplies and

Equipment: 41%

Service: 41%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

13%

Air Force

23%

Other Defense

12%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 9%

National 

Guard: 17%

Civilian: 18%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

1%

Air Force

18%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Webuild

Leading Technology Composites

Fleetcor Technologies, Inc.

Northrop Grumman

Celltron, Inc.

Bombardier, Inc.

Textron

General Electric

D-J Engineering, Inc.

Booz Allen Hamilton

(M = millions)

$218.8 M

$107.8 M

$87.4 M

$80.4 M

$72.7 M

$70.2 M

$62.3 M

$60.0 M

$33.3 M

$28.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.6 $1.5 $1.4

FY14

$1.3

$1.0 $0.9 $0.8 $0.9

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$2.2 BILLION 39,055

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

53%

Active Duty: 55%

80%

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Geary

Sedgwick

Leavenworth

Shawnee

Johnson

Riley

Saline

Crawford

Wyandotte

Douglas

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

15,287 2,511 135 

2,852 1,033 1,811

3,280 2,517 309 

27 576 1,900

29 98 445 

36 150 275 

ND 43 201 

ND ND 161

0 34 162

40 24 49 

Reserve

104 

1,767

334 

308 

386

107 

46

28 

0 

69

Total

18,037

7,463

6,440

2,811

958 

568

ND 

ND 

196

182 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

KANSAS 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Sedgwick

Wyandotte

Leavenworth

Johnson

Geary

Cherokee

Cowley

Butler

Shawnee

Labette

(M = millions)

$540.0 M

$239.1 M

$189.1 M

$150.1 M

$148.5 M

$73.0 M 

$62.4 M

$35.5 M

$28.1 M

$10.6 M

Geary

Leavenworth

Sedgwick

Shawnee

Riley

Johnson

Saline

Douglas

Wyandotte

Rush

$995.7 M

$557.6 M

$352.8 M

$109.9 M

$28.6 M

$28.4 M

$11.7 M

$7.7 M 

$6.2 M

$6.0 M

Geary

Butler

Sedgwick

Cowley Labette

Leavenworth

Shawnee

Johnson

Cherokee

Wyandotte

Johnson

Wyandotte

Leavenworth

Geary

Shawnee

Sedgwick

Rush

Saline

Riley

Douglas

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 51

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
52 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

KENTUCKY 

#14

$13.8 B SPENT IN 

#8 

5.7% OF STATE GDP

2.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$3,068

PER RESIDENT 

#13

$10.6 B CONTRACT 

#16

57,462 NUMBER OF 

#14

$3.2 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

Supplies and

Equipment: 7% Construction: 9%

Research and

Development: 0% Service: 85%

By Service 

Army

20%

Navy/Marines

1%

Air Force

1%

Other Defense

77%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 8%

National 

Guard: 14%

Civilian: 18% Active Duty: 61%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

94%

Navy/Marines

1%

Air Force

3%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Humana

Walsh-Turner, JV II

Lockheed Martin

Bechtel Parsons Blue Grass, JV

Boeing

United Parcel Service Co.

BAE Systems

US Medical Glove Co. LLC

Messer Construction Co.

Inverness Technologies, Inc.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$7.1 B

$840.1 M

$619.9 M

$373.2 M

$113.7 M

$83.9 M

$73.0 M

$63.6 M

$59.0 M

$53.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$10.6 $9.5 $9.5

$7.9

$6.1

FY14

$5.6 $5.8

FY15

$4.9

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$3.2 BILLION 57,462

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Christian 28,724 2,428 45 

Hardin 6,007 4,472 74 

Jefferson 137 1,223 1,810

Madison ND 1,038 637

Franklin 28 299 1,160

Fayette 79 110 286

Boone 46 18 597 

Muhlenberg 0 77 356

Campbell ND 33 0 

McCracken 0 11 105 

Reserve

182 

2,268

608

34 

0 

538 

ND 

0 

392 

189 

Total

31,379

12,821

3,778

ND 

1,487

1,013

ND 

433 

ND 

305 
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 KENTUCKY

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

McCracken

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Jefferson

Fayette

Hardin

Madison

Christian

Meade

Boone

Carter

McCreary

Boyle

(M = millions, B = billions)

$8.3 B 

$765.3 M

$422.7 M

$413.0 M

$394.6 M

$53.0 M

$40.5 M

$28.8 M

$28.8 M

$26.2 M

Christian

Hardin

Jefferson

Madison

Franklin

Fayette

Boone

Muhlenberg

Campbell

McCracken

$1.9 B

$853.1 M

$169.3 M

$87.0 M 

$68.3 M

$34.9 M

$20.8 M

$12.0 M

$7.0 M 

$6.8 M

Jefferson

Hardin

Boone

Fayette

Madison Boyle

Meade

Carter

McCreary

Jefferson

Boone

Fayette

Campbell

Christian

Christian

Hardin Madison

Franklin

Muhlenberg

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 5

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

3
54 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

LOUISIANA 

#32

$3.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#34

1.3% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$768

PER RESIDENT 

#37 

$1.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#22

37,571 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#25

$1.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 22%

Supplies and

Equipment: 38%

Research and

Development: 2%

Service: 38%

By Service 

Army

42%

Navy/Marines

36%

Air Force

9%

Other Defense

13%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 14%

Active Duty: 38%

National 

Guard: 30%

Civilian: 17%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

62%

Navy/Marines

11%

Air Force

26%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Thoma-Sea Marine Constructors

Placid Refining Co.

Nova Global Supply and Services

Swiftships

Phylway Construction LLC

Hornbeck Offshore Services

Amentum Services, Inc.

Great Lakes Dredge and Dock

Gravois Aluminum Boats

JGILS

(M = millions)

$197.4 M

$94.8 M

$64.7 M

$62.1 M

$59.6 M

$48.1 M

$47.6 M

$37.0 M

$32.6 M

$30.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.5 $2.2 $2.0

FY14

$1.9 $1.9

FY15

$1.6 $1.7

$0.8

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$1.9 BILLION 37,571

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Vernon

Bossier

Orleans

Rapides

East Baton Rouge

Tangipahoa

Iberville

Plaquemines

Lafayette

Calcasieu

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

7,860 1,430 96

5,035 1,522 150 

1,032 1,798 2,447

ND 412 1,436

150 108 602

ND 105 766

ND 41 788 

79 638 0 

29 47 332 

ND 42 313 

Reserve

24 

1,930

2,515

ND 

546

0 

ND 

0 

72 

120 

Total

9,410

8,637

7,792

ND 

1,406

ND 

ND 

717 

480 

ND 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

LOUISIANA 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Lafourche

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Vernon

Orleans

Lafourche

Plaquemines

Bossier

St. Tammany

West Baton Rouge

St. Mary

East Baton Rouge

Terrebonne

(M = millions)

$262.7 M

$248.9 M

$241.5 M

$125.6 M

$114.4 M

$105.5 M

$95.3 M

$84.0 M

$68.6 M

$43.1 M

Vernon

Bossier

Orleans

Rapides

East Baton Rouge

Plaquemines

Iberville

Tangipahoa

Lafayette

Caddo

$533.3 M

$505.3 M

$428.8 M

$71.5 M

$44.6 M

$41.0 M

$29.3 M

$27.0 M

$23.3 M

$16.1 M

Bossier

Vernon

East Baton Rouge

St. Tammany

Orleans

St. Mary

Terrebonne Plaquemines

West Baton Rouge

Bossier

Vernon

East Baton Rouge

Rapides

Iberville

Tangipahoa

Plaquemines

Orleans

Lafayette

Caddo

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 55

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
56 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MAINE 

#35

$3.2 B SPENT IN 

#10

4.1% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,348

PER RESIDENT 

#30 

$2.4 B CONTRACT 

#43

12,696 NUMBER OF 

#37 

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 7% Research and

Development: 1% 

Supplies and Service: 38%

Equipment: 54%

By Service 

Army

2%

Navy/Marines

63%

Air Force

12%

Other Defense

23%

Top Defense Contractors 

General Dynamics

Martin’s Point Health Care

Puritan Medical Products

Elscott Manufacturing LLC

Cianbro Cos.

381 Constructors

Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.

American Rheinmetall Systems LLC

Spirit Aerosystems Holdings

Benaka, Inc.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.1 B

$392.3 M

$267.5 M

$104.9 M

$75.7 M

$70.0 M

$67.3 M

$20.0 M

$17.9 M

$16.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$3.2

FY19

$2.6 $2.7

FY17

$2.4

$1.7 $1.3 $1.4

FY16

$1.2

FY14 FY15 FY18 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 5% Active Duty: 2%

National 

Guard: 23%

Civilian: 70%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

21%

Navy/Marines

63%

Air Force

10%

Other Defense

6%

$842.8 MILLION 12,696

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

York ND 7,252 62 176 ND 

Penobscot ND 369 1,497 124 ND 

Kennebec ND 191 641 ND ND 

Aroostook 0 583 102 0 685

Cumberland 40 76 371 126 613

Sagadahoc 83 334 0 0 417 

Androscoggin ND 19 88 206 ND 

Washington ND 77 34 0 ND 

Oxford 0 0 96 0 96

Somerset 12 ND 54 0 ND 
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MAINE

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Sagadahoc

York

Cumberland

Piscataquis

Hancock

Penobscot

Washington

Kennebec

Aroostook

Oxford

(M = millions)

$1.0 B

$449.2 M

$418.9 M

$267.5 M

$111.4 M

$27.1 M

$22.5 M

$12.9 M

$12.7 M

$3.1 M

York

Penobscot

Sagadahoc

Kennebec

Aroostook

Cumberland

Androscoggin

Washington

Hancock

Oxford

$611.3 M

$73.2 M

$42.6 M

$35.9 M

$33.3 M 

$22.9 M

$8.7 M 

$6.2 M

$2.4 M

$1.9 M

Oxford

Penobscot Piscataquis

Washington

York

Kennebec

Sagadahoc

Cumberland

Hancock

Penobscot

Oxford

Androscoggin

York

Kennebec

Sagadahoc

Cumberland

Hancock

Washington

Aroostook

Aroostook

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 5

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

7
58 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MARYLAND 

#6

$26.3 B SPENT IN 

#7 

5.8% OF STATE GDP

4.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$4,258

PER RESIDENT 

#8 

$17.9 B CONTRACT 

#8 

96,310 NUMBER OF 

#5

$8.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 4% Research and

Supplies and Development: 12%

Equipment: 26%

Service: 58%

By Service 

Army

25%

Navy/Marines

34%

Air Force

13%

Other Defense

28%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 13%

National 

Active Duty: 30% Guard: 7%

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Civilian: 50%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

37%

Navy/Marines

37%

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

10%

Top Defense Contractors 

Johns Hopkins University

Northrop Grumman

Leidos

Lockheed Martin

BAE Systems

Booz Allen Hamilton

Amentum Services, Inc.

Textron

Federal Resources Supply

General Dynamics

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.6 B

$1.3 B

$727.3 M

$705.3 M

$534.6 M

$474.9 M

$442.1 M

$421.9 M

$352.6 M

$345.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$22.7

$17.8 $17.9 $16.9 $14.4 $14.8 $13.0 $13.2

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$8.3 BILLION 96,310

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Reserve

3,870

4,616

622

16

528 

229 

780 

600

961

113 

County

Anne Arundel

Prince George’s

Harford

St. Mary’s

Montgomery

Frederick

Charles

Baltimore

Baltimore City

Allegany

Active Civilian

Duty

13,258

4,778

835 

2,126

4,745

1,274

588 

132 

63

1,040

9,190

4,763

10,886

10,384

6,717

2,280

2,406

380 

1,004

ND 

National

Guard

342 

1,041

892 

66

182 

95 

88 

2,735

374 

ND 

Total

26,660

15,198

13,235

12,592

12,172

3,878

3,862

3,847

2,402

ND 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Anne Arundel

Montgomery

St. Mary’s

Harford

Howard

Baltimore

Baltimore City

Frederick

Queen Anne’s

(M = millions, B = billions)

$4.3 B

$2.8 B

$2.6 B

$2.2 B

$1.8 B

$1.2 B

Prince George’s

$1.0 B

$581.8 M

$513.8 M

$371.6 M

Anne Arundel

St. Mary’s

Harford

Montgomery

Frederick

Charles

Baltimore

Baltimore City

Allegany

$2.1 B

$1.4 B

$1.4 B

$1.2 B

Prince George’s

$1.2 B

$339.5 M

$292.5 M

$155.6 M

$145.8 M

$92.8 M

Frederick Baltimore Harford

Howard

Montgomery

Baltimore City

Queen Anne’s

Anne Arundel

Prince George’s

St. Mary’s

Frederick Baltimore Harford

Allegany

Baltimore City

Anne Arundel

Montgomery

Prince George’s

St. Mary’s

Charles

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 5

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

9

MARYLAND 
60 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

Development: 7%

Service: 25%

MASSACHUSETTS 

#7 

$21.3 B SPENT IN 

#13

3.2% OF STATE GDP

3.8%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$3,057

PER RESIDENT 

#6

$20.1 B CONTRACT 

#33 

23,304 NUMBER OF 

#32

$1.2 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0%

Supplies and

Equipment: 67%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

10%

Other Defense

15%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 9%

Ci

7%

vilian: 30%

e: 2

National Guard: 34%

Reserv

Allocations, By Service 

Army

51%

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

38%

Other Defense

3%

Research and

53%

21%

Top Defense Contractors 

Moderna, Inc.

Raytheon Technologies

General Electric

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

General Dynamics

Charles Stark Draper Laboratory

MITRE

Noble Sales & Logisitics

L3Harris Technologies

Brighton Marine Health Center

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$20.1

$15.3 $13.8 $12.8 $10.3 $8.4 $9.1 $8.8

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$1.2 BILLION 23,304

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

(M = millions, B = billions)

$6.9 B

$4.1 B

$2.0 B

$1.2 B

$947.9 M

$398.9 M

$365.9 M

$208.9 M

$161.4 M

$156.1 M

County

Middlesex

Hampden

Barnstable

Suffolk

Worcester

Bristol

Plymouth

Norfolk

Essex

Hampshire

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

1,217 4,708 2,100

188 1,091 1,464

64 421 1,909

410 317 135 

32 78 623

ND 56 427 

29 41 350 

ND 21 382 

12 135 382 

14 14 184 

Reserve

2,226

2,794

0 

223 

129 

332 

308 

215 

26

0 

Total

10,251

5,537

2,394

1,085

862

ND 

728 

ND 

555 

212 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MASSACHUSETTS FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Middlesex

Essex

Norfolk

Berkshire

Bristol

Suffolk

Plymouth

Worcester

Hampshire

Hampden

(M = millions)

$13.5 B

$4.0 B

$537.6 M

$472.9 M

$416.4 M

$345.7 M

$323.5 M

$123.9 M

$121.1 M

$92.9 M

Middlesex

Hampden

Barnstable

Suffolk

Norfolk

Essex

Worcester

Bristol

Plymouth

Berkshire

$719.0 M

$200.0 M

$103.6 M

$80.1 M

$25.7 M

$24.5 M

$24.3 M

$20.3 M

$19.8 M

$9.0 M 

Essex

Berkshire

Middlesex

Hampshire Worcester

Norfolk

Bristol

Suffolk

Berkshire

Middlesex

Worcester

Bristol

Barnstable

Suffolk

Essex

Norfolk

Hampden

Hampden

Plymouth

Plymouth

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 6

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

1
62 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MICHIGAN 

#24

$6.5 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#41

1.1% OF STATE GDP

1.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$649

PER RESIDENT 

#22

$5.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#30 

26,133 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#30 

$1.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0%

Supplies and

Equipment: 77%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

8%

Other Defense

13%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Research and

Development: 7%

Service: 16%

71%

Top Defense Contractors 

General Dynamics

Rolls-Royce Solutions America

Williams International Co. LLC

ManTech

BAE Systems

American Tooling Center, Inc.

Loc Performance Products

General Electric

Peckham Vocational Industries

L3Harris Technologies

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$5.1 $5.1

$4.2

FY18

$4.4

$3.0

FY16

$2.6 $2.2

$0.7

FY14 FY15 FY17 FY19 FY20 FY21

$1.4 BILLION 26,133

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Macomb 231 6,785 1,458

Calhoun 49 1,277 1,026

Wayne 153 346 1,353

Kalamazoo 13 90 928 

Clinton ND ND 1,232

Kent 84 96 723 

Oakland 56 232 179 

Ingham 165 486 148 

Eaton 36 67 522 

Saginaw ND ND 325 

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.3 B

$194.0 M

$161.1 M

$145.4 M

$121.5 M

$97.7 M

$97.0 M

$95.6 M

$90.8 M

$89.6 M

Reserve

1,090

323 

443 

730 

132 

257 

519 

23 

ND 

256

Total

9,564

2,675

2,295

1,761

ND 

1,160

986

822 

ND 

ND 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 4% Reserve: 17%

Civilian: 38%

National 

Guard: 42%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

74%

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

13%

Other Defense

6%
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MICHIGAN 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Macomb

Oakland

Wayne

Kent

Ingham

Muskegon

Washtenaw

Wexford

Dickinson

Clinton

(M = millions)

$3.0 B 

$576.2 M

$279.7 M

$217.6 M

$154.4 M

$141.4 M

$130.5 M

$109.9 M

$77.3 M 

$68.8 M

Macomb

Calhoun

Wayne

Clinton

Kalamazoo

Ingham

Oakland

Kent

Eaton

Washtenaw

$797.3 M 

$158.8 M

$92.6 M

$65.9 M

$44.3 M

$43.1 M

$42.1 M

$36.7 M

$24.2 M

$20.0 M

Dickinson

Wexford

Muskegon

Macomb

Wayne

Kent

Oakland

Clinton

Washtenaw

Ingham

Eaton

Calhoun

Kent

Macomb

Wayne

Oakland

Clinton

Washtenaw

Ingham

Kalamazoo

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 63

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
64 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MINNESOTA 

#39 

$2.2 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#50

0.5% OF STATE GDP

0.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$387 

PER RESIDENT 

#39 

$1.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#34

21,636 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#39 

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and 

Construction: 2% Development: 7%

Service: 10%

Supplies and Equipment: 81%

By Service 

Army

40%

Navy/Marines

32%

Air Force

11%

Other Defense

18%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 2%

Civilian: 13%

Reserve: 25%

National Guard: 60%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

72%

Navy/Marines

6%

Air Force

21%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Northrop Grumman

BAE Systems

Cummins

3M

Honeywell

General Dynamics

Raytheon Technologies

Alliant Techsystems Operations

UnitedHealth Group

Polaris Industries

(M = millions)

$340.7 M

$274.9 M

$98.1 M

$77.7 M

$73.5 M

$67.0 M

$41.1 M

$35.4 M

$30.8 M

$27.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.1 $4.0 $3.5 $3.3

FY14

$2.8

FY15

$2.1

FY16 FY17

$1.8

FY18

$1.5

FY19 FY20 FY21

$695.7 MILLION 21,636

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Hennepin 353 698 1,639

Ramsey 55 944 2,003

Morrison ND 437 1,628

St. Louis 13 301 1,442

Washington 0 12 807 

Dakota ND 58 718 

Stearns ND 105 332 

Blue Earth 27 12 222 

Crow Wing 24 22 219 

Wright ND ND 152 

Reserve

3,657

869

0 

98 

0 

0 

118 

126

76

139 

Total

6,347

3,871

ND 

1,854

819 

ND 

ND 

387 

341 

ND 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MINNESOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Hennepin

Anoka

Ramsey

Dakota

Washington

Sherburne

St. Louis

Olmsted

Morrison

Carver

(M = millions)

$752.5 M

$404.9 M

$103.7 M

$85.9 M

$28.7 M

$16.8 M

$13.3 M

$8.2 M

$7.5 M

$5.8 M

Hennepin

Ramsey

Morrison

St. Louis

Dakota

Washington

Stearns

Blue Earth

Crow Wing

Winona

$231.0 M

$149.9 M

$59.5 M

$58.6 M

$27.7 M

$19.9 M

$19.5 M

$12.4 M

$12.4 M

$7.9 M 

St. Louis

Morrison

Anoka

Hennepin Washington

Ramsey

Carver Dakota

Olmsted

Morrison

Stearns

Hennepin Washington

Ramsey

Dakota

Winona

Blue Earth

Crow Wing

Sherburne

St. Louis

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 6

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

5
66 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MISSISSIPPI 

#28

$5.6 B SPENT IN 

#9 

4.3% OF STATE GDP

1.0%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,911

PER RESIDENT 

#26

$3.8 B CONTRACT 

#23

36,538 NUMBER OF 

#26

$1.8 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 1% Development: 2% 

Supplies and

Equipment: 66%

By Service 

Army

7%

Navy/Marines

Air Force

15%

Other Defense

4%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 11%

National 

Guard: 31%

Civilian: 27%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

24%

Air Force

Other Defense

1%

Service: 31%

74%

Active Duty: 31%

41%

35%

Top Defense Contractors 

Huntington Ingalls

L3Harris Technologies

ST Engineering

Raytheon Technologies

United States Marine, Inc.

Olin Corp.

M1 Support Services

Mississippi State University

Penguin Computing, Inc.

Vectrus

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$5.9 $5.8

FY18

$4.7 $4.8

FY17

$3.8

$2.6 $2.3

$1.3

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY19 FY20 FY21

$1.8 BILLION 36,538

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Harrison 7,932 2,417 946

Lauderdale 1,018 666 1,274

Warren ND 2,609 147 

Hinds 44 427 1,403

Lowndes 1,329 605 86

Hancock 512 1,346 58 

Forrest 349 398 796

Rankin ND 337 1,337

Jackson 68 571 146

Lee 24 97 433 

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.0 B

$741.1 M

$190.7 M

$106.2 M

$47.9 M

$43.6 M

$39.9 M

$26.7 M

$25.5 M

$24.4 M

Reserve

2,053

325 

257 

403 

94 

ND 

188 

0 

24 

111 

Total

13,348

3,283

ND 

2,277

2,114

ND 

1,731

ND 

809 

665
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MISSISSIPPI

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Lee

Rankin

Lauderdale

Hinds

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Oktibbeha

Scott

Forrest

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Jackson

Madison

Harrison

Warren

Scott

Hancock

Lowndes

Lafayette

Oktibbeha

Forrest

(M = millions)

$2.2 B

$734.1 M

$214.8 M

$117.6 M

$103.8 M

$93.4 M

$86.8 M

$47.1 M

$42.4 M

$36.0 M

Harrison

Warren

Hancock

Lowndes

Lauderdale

Hinds

Forrest

Jackson

Rankin

Lee

$633.2 M

$235.7 M

$164.1 M

$142.7 M

$137.8 M

$98.1 M

$85.7 M

$62.1 M

$61.0 M

$23.8 M

Lafayette

Lowndes

Madison

Warren

Jackson

Harrison

Hancock

Lowndes

Warren

Forrest

Jackson

Harrison

Hancock

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 67

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
68 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MISSOURI 

#16

$12.2 B SPENT IN 

#12

3.3% OF STATE GDP

2.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,979

PER RESIDENT 

#14

$10.5 B CONTRACT 

#20

42,815 NUMBER OF 

#27

$1.7 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and 

Construction: 1% Development: 3%

Supplies and

Equipment: 72%

By Service 

Army

16%

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

18%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 17%

National 

Guard: 27%

Civilian: 19%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

9%

Air Force

20%

Other Defense

2%

Service: 24%

29%

38%

Active Duty: 36%

69%

Top Defense Contractors 

Boeing

Express Scripts

Leonardo SpA

World Wide Technology

Olin Corp.

Cerner Corp.

AECOM

Melrose Industries

McCarthy HITT - Next NGA West, JV

Enersys

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$12.5 $12.0

FY19 FY20

$10.5 $9.6

$6.8 $6.2

FY15

$5.8 $6.2

FY14 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY21

$1.7 BILLION 42,815

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Pulaski 10,480 3,094 281 

Johnson 3,852 1,073 1,091

Jackson 89 856 942 

St. Louis 61 332 1,490

Greene 21 271 946

St. Louis City 250 979 0 

Buchanan 13 300 1,276

Cole 22 339 809 

St. Charles ND 113 0 

Cass 0 25 130 

(M = millions, B = billions)

$6.9 B

$742.5 M

$476.5 M

$414.6 M

$333.1 M

$181.2 M

$84.0 M

$68.1 M

$60.7 M

$60.5 M

Reserve

396

990 

1,840

1,147

660

475 

77 

108 

860

407 

Total

14,251

7,006

3,727

3,030

1,898

1,704

1,666

1,278

ND 

562
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MISSOURI

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Buchanan

Boone

Cole

Greene

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

St. Louis

Jackson

Pulaski

Clay

Johnson

Jasper

Atchison

St. Charles

St. Louis City

Jefferson

(M = millions)

$8.8 B 

$459.9 M

$255.3 M

$207.6 M

$134.1 M

$101.7 M

$93.2 M

$92.2 M

$91.0 M

$48.9 M

Pulaski

Johnson

Jackson

St. Louis City

St. Louis

Cole

Buchanan

Greene

St. Charles

Boone

$617.0 M

$342.5 M

$158.5 M

$115.8 M

$91.8 M

$68.5 M

$64.2 M

$49.4 M

$31.1 M

$16.5 M

Clay

Jackson

Johnson

Jasper

Atchison

St. Louis

St. Louis City

Jefferson

Pulaski

Jackson

Johnson St. Louis

St. Louis City

St. Charles

St. Charles

Pulaski

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 69

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
70 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MONTANA 

#48

$0.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#44

1.0% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$586

PER RESIDENT 

#47

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#48

8,982 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#47

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0%

Supplies and

Equipment: 29%

Service: 63%

By Service 

Army

14%

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

65%

Other Defense

13%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 10%

Active Duty: 37%

National 

Guard: 37%

Civilian: 16%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

40%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

56%

Other Defense

0%

Research and

Development: 8% 

Top Defense Contractors 

S & K Technologies

Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes

James Talcott Construction, Inc.

T & L Sales

2101 LLC

Montana State University

S2 Corp.

Corbett Technology Solutions, Inc.

AdvR, Inc.

Sonju Industrial Coatings, Inc.

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.3 $0.3

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2

$0.1

$0.2

FY18 FY19

$0.2

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY20 FY21

$400.5 MILLION 8,982

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Cascade 3,243 877 962

Lewis and Clark ND 383 923 

Yellowstone 35 27 335 

Missoula 28 24 169

Gallatin 11 14 262

Flathead ND ND 153 

Silver Bow 12 20 70 

Phillips 0 0 89 

Lincoln 0 49 39 

Park 0 0 71 

(M = millions)

$65.7 M

$25.1 M

$13.7 M

$12.4 M

$12.3 M

$9.4 M

$8.2 M

$6.0 M

$4.6 M

$4.4 M

Reserve

57 

316

277 

156

ND 

14 

40 

0 

0 

0 

Total

5,139

ND 

674

377 

ND 

ND 

142 

89 

88 

71 
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MONTANA

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Lincoln Phillips Valley

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Ravalli

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) 

Lake

Cascade

Gallatin

Flathead

Deer Lodge

Yellowstone

Lewis and Clark

Missoula

Silver Bow

Ravalli

(M = millions)

$90.4 M

$75.2 M

$29.7 M

$13.3 M

$12.3 M

$6.3 M

$4.4 M

$3.9 M 

$2.8 M

$897.5 K

Cascade

Lewis and Clark

Yellowstone

Gallatin

Missoula

Silver Bow

Lincoln

Flathead

Valley

Phillips

$263.3 M

$68.8 M

$17.0 M

$9.9 M 

$9.5 M

$9.0 M 

$5.8 M

$4.2 M

$4.0 M

$1.7 M

Flathead

Lake

Lewis and Clark

Cascade

Missoula

Deer Lodge

Silver Bow

Gallatin

Yellowstone

Flathead

Missoula

Lewis and Clark

Cascade

Silver Bow

Gallatin

Yellowstone

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 7

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

1
72 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

Equipment: 13% 

NEBRASKA 

#42

$1.7 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#42

1.1% OF STATE GDP

0.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$844

PER RESIDENT 

#43

$0.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#37 

16,608 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#34

$1.0 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Construction: 10%

Service: 71%

By Service 

Army

21%

Navy/Marines

5%

Air Force

Other Defense

9%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 11%

National 

Guard: 26%

Civilian: 25%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

35%

Navy/Marines

5%

Air Force

Other Defense

1%

59%

Research and

Development: 6%

Top Defense Contractors 

Peraton Corp.

Medvolt Construction Services

SAIC

Northrop Grumman

Gilbane

Medvolt-Komada, JV

Metgreen Solutions, Inc.

Booz Allen Hamilton

Raytheon Technologies

Covenant Russell LLC

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.9

$0.8

FY15

$0.7 $0.7 $0.7 $0.7 $0.6 $0.6

FY14 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$965.9 MILLION 16,608

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Sarpy 6,172 2,585 76

Lancaster 33 524 2,078

Douglas 95 891 276

Saunders 0 29 690

Hall 16 38 249 

Adams 0 20 191 

Dodge 0 ND 0 

Buffalo ND ND 124 

Platte 0 ND 124 

Madison 0 11 94 

(M = millions)

$97.1 M

$54.5 M

$43.6 M

$39.8 M

$21.4 M

$17.5 M

$17.4 M

$17.1 M

$16.2 M

$15.1 M

Reserve

622

201 

542 

0 

0 

31 

165

36

43 

29 

Total

9,455

2,836

1,804

719 

303 

242 

ND 

ND 

ND 

134 

66%

Active Duty: 38%
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NEBRASKA 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Buffalo

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Sarpy

Douglas

Lancaster

Madison

Thurston

Adams

Saunders

Hall

Dawson

Kimball

(M = millions)

$550.6 M

$65.4 M

$24.4 M

$9.7 M 

$7.4 M

$6.2 M

$2.9 M

$2.7 M

$2.2 M

$2.0 M

Sarpy

Lancaster

Douglas

Saunders

Hall

Adams

Buffalo

Cedar

Dodge

Platte

$692.9 M

$110.9 M

$102.3 M

$17.8 M

$9.5 M

$5.0 M

$4.3 M

$4.0 M

$3.6 M

$3.3 M 

Thurston

Saunders

Madison

Douglas

Sarpy

LancasterLancaster

Adams

Kimball

Dawson Hall

LancasterLancaster

Adams

Saunders

Douglas

Sarpy Hall

Platte

Cedar

Dodge

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 73

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
 

NEVADA 

#36 

$3.1 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#31 

1.5% OF STATE GDP 

0.5% 

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$974 

PER RESIDENT 

#35 

$1.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#32 

23,404 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#31 

$1.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 3%

Supplies and

Equipment: 21%

By Service 

Army

14%

Navy/Marines

16%

Air Force

Other Defense

8%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Service: 75%

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 15%

National 

Guard: 19%

Civilian: 13%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

24%

Navy/Marines

10%

Air Force

Other Defense

1%

Research and

Development: 2%

61%

Active Duty: 53%

65%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Sierra Nevada Corp. $396.8 M 

JT4 $321.6 M 

Huntington Ingalls $117.4 M 

M1 Support Services $91.9 M 

Amentum Services, Inc. $60.5 M 

Draken International, Inc. $48.3 M 

Day & Zimmermann Group $39.5 M 

Tactical Air Support, Inc. $27.5 M 

U.S. Ordnance $24.6 M 

Intelligent Waves $23.1 M 

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.8 $1.7 $1.7 $1.7 $1.5 $1.4 $1.3 $1.2

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$1.3 BILLION 23,404

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard 

Reserve Total 

Clark 11,035 2,037 2,030 2,936 18,038

Washoe 40 382 1,847 ND ND 

Churchill 1,177 309 120 589 2,195

Carson City ND 194 525 ND ND 

Mineral 0 49 0 0 49 

Humboldt 44 0 0 0 44 

Elko 0 ND 29 0 ND 

Pershing ND 0 0 0 ND 

Storey ND 0 0 0 ND 

Douglas 0 ND 0 0 ND 

74 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEVADA

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Humboldt

Pershing

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Clark

Washoe

Churchill

Mineral

Lyon

Carson City

Douglas

Storey

Elko

Nye

(K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

$937.0 M 

$491.4 M

$213.5 M

$62.0 M

$15.2 M

$10.1 M

$6.1 M

$1.1 M

$492.7 K

$170.3 K

Clark

Churchill

Washoe

Carson City

Mineral

Humboldt

Storey

Elko

Douglas

Pershing

$1.1 B

$123.6 M

$81.9 M

$38.0 M 

$3.3 M 

$1.3 M

$992.5 K

$613.5 K

$316.5 K

$255.8 K

Washoe

Storey

Churchill

Carson City Lyon

Douglas

Mineral Nye

Clark

Elko

Clark

Washoe

Elko

Carson City

Douglas

Mineral

Churchill

Storey

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 7

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

5
76 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

NEW HAMPSHIRE 

#38 

$2.3 B SPENT IN 

#21

2.3% OF STATE GDP

0.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,671

PER RESIDENT 

#33 

$2.0 B CONTRACT 

#50

6,298 NUMBER OF 

#50

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 67%

By Service 

Army

Research and

Development: 11%

Service: 21%

19%

Navy/Marines

28%

Air Force

39%

Other Defense

15%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 21% Active Duty: 19%

Civilian: 17%

National Guard: 44%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

49%

Navy/Marines

25%

Air Force

23%

Other Defense

3%

Top Defense Contractors 

BAE Systems

L3Harris Technologies

Methuen Construction

Renco Corp.

Elbit Systems

Amphenol Corp.

CDM/Cape A, JV

L & C Protec, Inc.

Solid State Scientific Corp.

Haigh-Farr, Inc.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.1 B

$102.9 M

$62.6 M

$48.1 M

$43.0 M

$41.7 M

$25.3 M

$23.1 M

$21.6 M

$20.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.6 $2.3

FY18

$2.1

FY19

$2.0

$1.6

$1.1 $1.1 $1.0

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY20 FY21

$311.2 MILLION 6,298

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Rockingham 302 420 1,136

Merrimack ND 200 742

Hillsborough 57 183 633

Strafford 14 18 129

Grafton ND 238 120

Cheshire ND ND 0

Belknap 0 ND 0

Carroll ND ND 0

Sullivan 0 ND 0

Reserve

1,014

ND

ND

243

0

37

0

0

0

Total

2,872

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

404
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NEW HAMPSHIRE FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

Hillsborough

Rockingham

Grafton

Coos

Sullivan

Strafford

Cheshire

Belknap

Merrimack

Carroll

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$1.4 B

$356.9 M

$67.7 M

$48.8 M

$27.9 M

$17.5 M

$16.8 M

$13.0 M

$4.7 M

$25.1 K

Rockingham

Merrimack

Hillsborough

Grafton

Strafford

Cheshire

Belknap

Sullivan

Carroll

$121.5 M

$49.2 M

$44.7 M

$24.3 M

$9.3 M 

$1.2 M

$247.9 K

$78.1 K

$41.8 K

Coos

Grafton

Carroll

Belknap

Merrimack

Rockingham

Cheshire

Sullivan Strafford

Hillsborough

Grafton

Carroll

Belknap

Merrimack

Rockingham

Cheshire

Sullivan Strafford

Hillsborough

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 7

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

7
78 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

NEW JERSEY 

#21

$9.3 B SPENT IN 

#36

1.3% OF STATE GDP

1.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,002

PER RESIDENT 

#17

$7.3 B CONTRACT 

#24

34,586 NUMBER OF 

#22

$2.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 1% Development: 11%

Service: 20%

Supplies and

Equipment: 68%

By Service 

Army

30%

Navy/Marines

32%

Air Force

8%

Other Defense

30%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 19% Reserve: 25%

National Civilian: 32%

Guard: 25%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

48%

Navy/Marines

17%

Air Force

34%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Lockheed Martin

Merck & Co., Inc.

Arctic Slope Regional Corp.

SAIC

L3Harris Technologies

AASKI Technology

Advanced Sciences and Technologies, LLC

Amentum Services, Inc.

URS Federal Services International, Inc.

Johnson & Johnson

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.6 B

$1.2 B

$597.8 M

$422.8 M

$354.2 M

$123.9 M

$113.5 M

$98.0 M

$79.0 M

$62.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$7.3 $6.8

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY18 FY19

$5.7 $5.7 $5.0 $5.1 $4.6 $4.0

FY17 FY20 FY21

$2.0 BILLION 34,586

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Burlington 5,545 2,911 1,793

Morris 129 4,516 651

Ocean 258 2,256 682

Atlantic ND 345 1,399

Monmouth 263 322 690

Bergen 58 27 458 

Camden 49 55 255 

Hudson ND 101 292 

Mercer 21 75 197 

Middlesex 62 32 192 

Reserve Total

6,677 16,926

281 5,577

42 3,238

93 ND 

431 1,706

291 834 

256 615

170 ND 

226 519 

161 447 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NEW JERSEY FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Hudson

Mercer

Atlantic

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Burlington

Union

Morris

Essex

Camden

Monmouth

Passaic

Middlesex

Somerset

Ocean

(M = millions)

$2.7 B

$1.3 B

$565.2 M

$471.0 M

$391.4 M

$357.2 M

$348.7 M

$176.2 M

$146.6 M

$139.0 M

Burlington

Morris

Ocean

Monmouth

Atlantic

Camden

Bergen

Mercer

Hudson

Middlesex

$883.3 M 

$555.2 M

$277.4 M

$77.1 M

$71.1 M

$21.4 M

$21.4 M

$18.4 M

$16.3 M

$16.3 M

Passaic

Morris

Somerset

Essex

Union

Monmouth

Camden Ocean

Morris

Bergen

Camden Ocean

Burlington

Burlington Monmouth

Middlesex

Middlesex

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 7

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

9
80 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

NEW MEXICO 

#33 

$3.3 B SPENT IN 

#15

2.9% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,547

PER RESIDENT 

#34

$1.8 B CONTRACT 

#31

24,553 NUMBER OF 

#29

$1.5 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Construction: 10%

Equipment: 19%

Research and

Development: 21% Service: 50%

By Service 

Army

26%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

59%

Other Defense

13%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 4%

National 

Guard: 16%

Active Duty: 51%

Civilian: 28%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

26%

Navy/Marines

2%

Air Force

71%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Applied Research Associates

Rhino Health LLC

Fluor Corp.

Southwest Range Services

M1 Support Services

Crew Training International, Inc.

SGS

Boeing

Hensel Phelps Construction

Sierra Nevada Corp.

(M = millions)

$138.7 M

$126.0 M

$105.7 M

$69.4 M

$67.6 M

$53.4 M

$44.9 M

$38.4 M

$35.5 M

$34.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.8

$2.7 $2.2 $2.1 $2.0 $2.3

FY18

$2.1

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

$1.8

FY19 FY20 FY21

$1.5 BILLION 24,553

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Bernalillo 3,430 3,306 1,371

Curry 4,742 511 56

Otero 4,144 957 55 

Doña Ana 292 1,732 553 

Santa Fe ND 235 559 

Sandoval 0 37 663

Chaves ND 13 171 

Valencia 0 ND 174 

San Juan ND ND 104 

Rio Arriba 0 12 56

Reserve

647

33 

91 

113 

210 

0 

ND 

0 

0 

0 

Total

8,754

5,342

5,247

2,690

ND 

700 

ND 

ND 

ND 

68
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NEW MEXICO FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Rio Arriba

Curry

Valencia

Chaves

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Sandoval McKinley Santa Fe

Los Alamos

Bernalillo Quay

Curry

Socorro

Otero

Doña Ana

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Bernalillo

Otero

Doña Ana

McKinley

Curry

Santa Fe

Quay

Socorro

Sandoval

Los Alamos

(M = millions)

$697.8 M

$366.2 M

$295.0 M

$139.3 M

$101.7 M

$39.2 M

$34.8 M

$27.2 M

$13.9 M

$10.1 M

Bernalillo

Curry

Otero

Doña Ana

Santa Fe

Sandoval

Chaves

Valencia

Rio Arriba

Socorro

$585.6 M

$322.6 M

$315.7 M

$180.6 M

$52.4 M

$18.3 M

$5.6 M

$4.1 M

$4.0 M

$3.5 M

Sandoval Santa Fe

Bernalillo

Socorro

Otero

Doña Ana

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 81

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
82 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

NEW YORK 

#4

$30.9 B SPENT IN 

#30 

1.6% OF STATE GDP

5.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,557

PER RESIDENT 

#4

$27.9 B CONTRACT 

#14

60,056 NUMBER OF 

#17

$3.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type Research and

Development: 3% Construction: 2%

Service: 5%

Supplies and Equipment: 90%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

13%

Air Force

5%

Other Defense

7%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 20%

National 

Guard: 28%

Civilian: 20%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

72%

Navy/Marines

9%

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

3%

Top Defense Contractors 

Pfizer, Inc.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Lockheed Martin

L3Harris Technologies

BAE Systems

Dobco, Inc.

Thermo Electron Corp.

SRC

Assured Information Security

TTM Technologies

(M = millions, B = billions)

$13.3 B

$5.6 B

$2.4 B

$1.4 B

$256.3 M

$195.3 M

$192.7 M

$159.7 M

$154.9 M

$151.8 M

76%

Active Duty: 32%

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$27.9

$9.1 $9.6 $7.4 $6.4 $6.5 $6.0 $6.6

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$3.0 BILLION 60,056

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Jefferson 15,657 2,221 77 

Orange 1,740 2,567 1,653

Onondaga 226 508 1,567

Oneida 65 1,927 693

Niagara 21 603 794 

Queens 84 107 621

Albany 213 1,404 909 

Kings 230 358 612

Schenectady 16 309 1,531

Suffolk 50 296 1,580

Reserve

221 

936

681

273 

1,536

1,931

33 

1,232

574 

338 

Total

18,176

6,896

2,982

2,958

2,954

2,743

2,559

2,432

2,430

2,264
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Schenectady

Albany

Kings

Jefferson

Niagara

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Orange

Westchester

Nassau

New York

Suffolk

Monroe

Erie

Tioga

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

New York

Westchester

Monroe

Tioga

Suffolk

Onondaga

Nassau

Oneida

Orange

Erie

(M = millions)

$13.8 B

$5.6 B

$1.7 B

$1.6 B

$1.1 B

$1.1 B

$690.1 M

$440.6 M

$403.9 M

$308.6 M

Jefferson

Orange

Oneida

Albany

Onondaga

Niagara

Schenectady

New York

Suffolk

Kings

$985.1 M

$445.2 M

$175.9 M

$170.2 M

$126.7 M

$113.0 M

$112.1 M

$106.3 M

$104.6 M

$98.5 M

Oneida 

Onondaga

Oneida

Onondaga

Orange Suffolk

New York

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 8

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

3

ISCAL YEAR 2018 NEW YORK 
84 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

NORTH CAROLINA 

#17 #27 2.1% $1,113 #25 #4 #6

$11.7 B SPENT IN 1.7% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $4.2 B CONTRACT 143,448 NUMBER $7.6 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 13%

Research and Supplies and Development: 3% Equipment: 35%

Service: 48%

By Service 

Army

41%

Navy/Marines

29%

Air Force

5%

Other Defense

25%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 7%

National Guard: 8%

Civilian: 16%

Active Duty: 69%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

50%

Navy/Marines

39%

Air Force

7%

Other Defense

4%

Top Defense Contractors 

GlaxoSmithKline

Booz Allen Hamilton

Walsh Group

RC Construction Co.-Millstone Weber, JV

Sodexo

Chemring Group

US Foods Holding

CACI

International Textile Group

Worldwide Language Resources

(M = millions)

$314.5 M

$207.1 M

$151.1 M

$81.6 M

$80.2 M

$69.2 M

$58.7 M

$58.0 M

$53.9 M

$53.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$6.9

$5.1

$4.1 $4.2 $3.6 $3.7

$2.5 $2.7

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$7.6 BILLION 143,448

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Cumberland

Onslow

Craven

Wayne

Wake

Mecklenburg

Guilford

New Hanover

Rowan

Caldwell

Duty

48,406

36,990

5,429

4,282

599 

244 

38 

ND 

0 

353 

Guard

10,663 657

4,002 118 

4,891 155 

827 227 

756 1,403

476 1,599

135 554 

306 197 

74 186

28 151 

Reserve

2,188

561

25 

1,513

2,222

1,047

936

268

349 

0 

Total

61,914

41,671

10,500

6,849

4,980

3,366

1,663

ND 

609

532 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NORTH CAROLINA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

New Hanover 

Brunswick

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Guilford

Durham

Wake

Buncombe

Wayne

Mecklenburg Cumberland

Craven

Onslow

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Cumberland

Onslow

Durham

Craven

Wake

Guilford

Mecklenburg

Wayne

Rockingham

Buncombe

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.2 B

$943.7 M

$370.5 M

$307.2 M

$225.1 M

$216.7 M

$145.2 M

$81.5 M

$79.0 M 

$71.6 M

Cumberland

Onslow

Craven

Wayne

Wake

Mecklenburg

Guilford

New Hanover

Durham

Brunswick

$4.2 B

$1.7 B

$595.2 M

$344.1 M

$190.1 M

$125.7 M

$45.1 M

$41.4 M

$26.0 M

$21.3 M

Rockingham

Durham

Wake

Wayne

Guilford

Mecklenburg Cumberland

Craven

Onslow

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 8

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

5
86 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

NORTH DAKOTA 

#45

$0.9 B SPENT IN 

#33 

1.4% OF STATE GDP

0.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,165

PER RESIDENT 

#49

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

#39 

13,925 NUMBER OF 

#40

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Construction: 13%

Equipment: 16% 

Service: 64%

By Service 

Army

26%

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

Other Defense

9%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

56%

Reserve: 3%

National 

Guard: 30%

Active Duty: 54%

Civilian: 13%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

27%

Navy/Marines

1%

Air Force

71%

Other Defense

0%

Research and

Development: 8% 

Top Defense Contractors 

Four Tribes Enterprises LLC

Strata Corp.

Earthmovers, Inc.

Gast Construction Co., Inc.

Pro-Mark Services

Ideal Aerosmith, Inc.

Summit Technical Solutions

Dakco Distributors

Packet Digital LLC

Johnson Controls

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

FY14

$0.3 $0.3

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2

FY20

$0.2

$0.1

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY21

$691.2 MILLION 13,925

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

(M = millions)

$20.6 M

$15.7 M

$15.3 M

$13.4 M

$11.9 M

$9.0 M

$8.6 M

$8.4 M

$7.1 M

$5.2 M

County

Ward

Grand Forks

Cass

Burleigh

Ramsey

Richland

Stutsman

Barnes

Stark

Lamoure

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

5,705 713 302 

1,724 371 347 

20 328 1,614

ND 270 973 

0 64 352 

ND 0 162

0 ND 116

0 20 88 

0 ND 74 

0 ND 63

Reserve

28 

58 

160

40 

0 

63

0 

0 

0 

0 

Total

6,748

2,500

2,122

ND 

416

ND 

ND 

108 

ND 

ND 
(M=millions)

NORTH DAKOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Ramsey

McLean

Barnes

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Pembina

Mountrail

Benson

McKenzie

Burleigh Stutsman Cass

LaMoure

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Ward

Grand Forks

Cass

Pembina

LaMoure

Stutsman

Burleigh

Benson

Mountrail

McKenzie

(M = millions)

$99.6 M

$42.6 M

$26.0 M

$13.2 M

$6.2 M

$4.2 M

$3.6 M

$1.6 M

$1.3 M

$850.5 K

Ward

Grand Forks

Cass

Burleigh

Ramsey

McLean

Pembina

Richland

Barnes

Stutsman

$389.2 M

$137.0 M

$73.9 M 

$54.3 M

$14.0 M

$5.0 M

$3.4 M

$3.4 M

$3.2 M

$2.4 M

Grand Forks

Ward

Richland

Burleigh Stutsman Cass

Grand Forks

Ward

Pembina

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 8

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

7
88 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

OHIO 

#18 #37 1.8% $844 #20 #12 #11

$9.9 B SPENT IN 1.3% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $6.3 B CONTRACT 61,589 NUMBER OF $3.6 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 15%

Service: 27%

Supplies and

Equipment: 58%

By Service 

Army

15%

Navy/Marines

15%

Air Force

39%

Other Defense

30%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 11% Reserve: 18%

National 

Civilian: 45% Guard: 26%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

31%

Navy/Marines

5%

Air Force

49%

Other Defense

15%

Top Defense Contractors 

General Electric

BAE Systems

CFM International

Federal Equipment Co.

University of Dayton

L3Harris Technologies

Raytheon Technologies

Frontier Technology, Inc.

Battelle Memorial Institute

Wornick

(M = millions)

$757.5 M

$334.7 M

$301.9 M

$184.7 M

$170.5 M

$166.5 M

$146.4 M

$128.4 M

$120.1 M

$113.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$8.0

$6.2 $6.3 $5.8

$4.6 $4.8

FY14

$3.9 $3.9

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$3.6 BILLION 61,589

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Greene 5,385 15,038 104 

Franklin 378 7,073 3,897

Cuyahoga 238 2,476 408 

Clark ND 319 1,636

Trumbull 30 58 380 

Hamilton 135 266 570 

Richland ND 282 1,484

Stark 32 29 689

Summit ND 188 443 

Fulton ND 0 1,027

Reserve Total

2,508 23,035

2,993 14,341

250 3,372

ND ND 

1,432 1,900

897 1,868

0 ND 

864 1,614

868 ND 

0 ND 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Fulton

Richland

Clark

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Cuyahoga

Miami Licking

Montgomery

Butler

Hamilton

Clermont

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Greene

Hamilton

Montgomery

Franklin

Butler

Cuyahoga

Licking

Clermont

Miami

Allen

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.6 B

$901.1 M

$900.9 M 

$735.0 M

$398.5 M

$322.2 M

$214.5 M

$175.1 M

$105.2 M

$81.6 M

Greene

Franklin

Cuyahoga

Hamilton

Clark

Richland

Montgomery

Fulton

Trumbull

Summit

$2.0 B

$798.7 M 

$207.5 M

$73.4 M

$65.5 M

$55.6 M

$43.7 M

$41.8 M

$41.5 M

$40.2 M

Allen

Greene

Franklin

Cuyahoga

Franklin

Greene

Montgomery

Hamilton

Summit

Trumbull

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 8

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

9

FISCAL YEAR 2018 OHIO
90 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

OKLAHOMA 

#25

$6.3 B SPENT IN 

#14

2.9% OF STATE GDP

1.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,582

PER RESIDENT 

#28

$3.0 B CONTRACT 

#13

60,790 NUMBER OF 

#13

$3.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 2%

Development: 3%

Supplies and

Equipment: 28%

Service: 68%

By Service 

Army

12%

Navy/Marines

10%

Air Force

68%

Other Defense

10%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 7%

National 

Guard: 14%

Active Duty: 35%

Civilian: 43%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

43%

Navy/Marines

5%

Air Force

49%

Other Defense

3%

Top Defense Contractors 

Boeing

L3Harris Technologies

Cherokee Nation

Cymstar

Strategic Mission Systems

Arctic Slope Regional Corp.

Booz Allen Hamilton

Afognak Native Corp.

Leidos

Professional Contract Services

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.1 B

$157.8 M

$74.3 M

$72.3 M

$66.2 M

$55.4 M

$48.8 M

$42.3 M

$41.7 M

$41.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$3.4 $3.4 $3.3 $3.1 $3.0

FY18 FY19 FY20

$3.0

$2.2 $1.8

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY21

$3.3 BILLION 60,790

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Oklahoma

Comanche

Tulsa

Jackson

Pittsburg

Garfield

Cleveland

Canadian

Wagoner

Muskogee

Duty

6,509

12,203

49 

1,307

ND 

1,243

36

ND 

14 

0 

Guard

18,699 2,262

2,602 420 

914 1,786

1,288 85 

1,827 78 

325 170 

161 966

25 650

17 450 

80 436

Reserve

2,231

416

342 

73 

12 

122 

59 

372 

424 

37 

Total

29,701

15,641

3,091

2,753

ND 

1,860

1,222

ND 

905 

553 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

OKLAHOMA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Tulsa

Wagoner

Pittsburg

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Garfield

Payne

Muskogee

Oklahoma

Cleveland

Comanche

Jackson

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Oklahoma

Tulsa

Comanche

Garfield

Pittsburg

Jackson

Rogers

Payne

Muskogee

Cleveland

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.1 B

$239.2 M

$233.3 M

$123.0 M

$48.3 M

$44.0 M

$40.3 M

$33.5 M

$26.2 M

$23.1 M

Oklahoma

Comanche

Jackson

Tulsa

Pittsburg

Garfield

Cleveland

Wagoner

Canadian

Muskogee

$2.0 B

$722.2 M

$168.2 M

$120.0 M

$118.7 M

$116.9 M

$36.4 M

$19.8 M

$19.1 M

$12.5 M

Rogers Tulsa

Pittsburg

Garfield

Oklahoma

Cleveland

Comanche

Jackson

Canadian Muskogee

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 91

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
92 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

OREGON 

#43

$1.4 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#51

0.5% OF STATE GDP

0.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$324

PER RESIDENT 

#41

$0.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#41

13,091 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#42

$0.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 4% Development: 6%

Service: 31%

Supplies and

Equipment: 59%

By Service 

Army

22%

Navy/Marines

23%

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

39%

Top Defense Contractors 

Vigor Industrial

EPIC Aviation

Teledyne Technologies

TTM Technologies

Saltchuk Resources, Inc.

Berkshire Hathaway

Bay West-Ahtna, JV LLC

Galois

Curtiss-Wright Corp.

DLX Enterprises LLC

(M = millions)

$101.0 M

$71.6 M

$70.5 M

$47.7 M

$36.7 M

$35.1 M

$26.6 M

$26.0 M

$21.1 M

$19.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.4

FY19

$1.0

$0.8 $0.8

FY20

$0.8

FY15

$0.7 $0.6 $0.6

FY14 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 11% Active Duty: 7%

Civilian: 23%

National Guard: 60%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

65%

Navy/Marines

11%

Air Force

23%

Other Defense

0%

$577.0 MILLION 13,091

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Multnomah 266 1,439 1,988 706 4,399

Marion 13 330 1,382 ND ND 

Klamath 106 285 936 0 1,327

Clackamas 29 176 646 393 1,244

Lane 50 142 372 288 852 

Umatilla 0 165 354 0 519 

Jackson ND 37 363 0 ND 

Clatsop 0 59 269 0 328 

Washington ND 17 252 0 ND 

Deschutes ND 33 197 0 ND 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

OREGON 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Umatilla

Sherman

Wasco

Jackson

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Washington Umatilla

Yamhill

Lane Deschutes

Josephine Klamath

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Multnomah

Clackamas

Washington

Marion

Klamath

Deschutes

Umatilla

Yamhill

Lane

Josephine

(M = millions)

$207.5 M

$171.8 M

$117.8 M

$75.1 M

$61.3 M

$37.6 M

$27.4 M

$23.5 M

$22.6 M

$13.0 M

Multnomah

Marion

Klamath

Clackamas

Lane

Umatilla

Wasco

Sherman

Jackson

Clatsop

$236.7 M

$74.0 M

$62.1 M

$38.2 M

$30.5 M

$22.0 M

$13.7 M

$11.6 M

$10.2 M

$10.2 M

Klamath

Lane

Multnomah

Multnomah

Marion

Marion

Clackamas

Clackamas

Clatsop

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 93

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
94 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

PENNSYLVANIA 

#10

$16.5 B SPENT IN 

#25

1.9% OF STATE GDP

2.9%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,272

PER RESIDENT 

#9 

$13.4 B CONTRACT 

#17

56,573 NUMBER OF 

#15

$3.1 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 1% Development: 7%

Service: 21%

Supplies and Equipment: 71%

By Service 

Army

12%

Navy/Marines

46%

Air Force

5%

Other Defense

36%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 4% Reserve: 18%

Civilian: 47%

National

Guard: 31%

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Allocations, By Service 

Army

54%

Navy/Marines

19%

Air Force

12%

Other Defense

15%

Top Defense Contractors 

AmerisourceBergen

Bechtel Group

Fluor Corp.

Boeing

BAE Systems

Highmark, Inc.

Lockheed Martin

Medico Industries, Inc.

Pennsylvania State University

Agustawestland Philadelphia Corp.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.0 B

$2.0 B

$1.4 B

$951.2 M

$551.5 M

$436.5 M

$295.7 M

$214.5 M

$197.5 M

$176.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$14.8 $14.5

FY19 FY20

$13.4 $12.3

$10.6 $10.3 $9.4

FY14

$8.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY21

$3.1 BILLION 56,573

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

County

Philadelphia

Allegheny

Cumberland

Lebanon

York

Monroe

Montgomery

Franklin

Dauphin

Cambria

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

319 8,373 1,357

351 1,548 1,384

629 4,227 211 

ND 1,014 3,700

258 3,176 151 

31 2,873 37 

54 352 1,544

ND 2,051 169

86 302 1,901

17 202 725 

Reserve

69

2,975

417 

165

405 

122 

635

296

160

412 

Total

10,118

6,258

5,484

ND 

3,990

3,063

2,585

ND 

2,449

1,356
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

PENNSYLVANIA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Monroe

Butler

Lebanon

Franklin

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Allegheny

Chester

Montgomery

Delaware

Philadelphia

York

Cumberland

Bucks

Dauphin

Cambria

(M = millions)

$3.8 B 

$1.5 B

$1.2 B

$1.1 B

$859.8 M

$722.6 M

$568.5 M

$526.7 M

$477.4 M

$448.2 M

Philadelphia

Cumberland

York

Allegheny

Lebanon

Monroe

Franklin

Montgomery

Dauphin

Butler

$863.3 M

$447.7 M

$292.4 M

$275.1 M

$214.1 M

$210.0 M

$164.5 M

$90.1 M

$81.6 M

$76.8 M

Allegheny

Cambria

Bucks

Montgomery

York

Delaware

Allegheny

Dauphin

Dauphin

Cumberland

Cumberland

Chester

York

Montgomery

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 95

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
96 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

RHODE ISLAND 

#41

$1.7 B SPENT IN 

#19

2.4% OF STATE GDP

0.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,533

PER RESIDENT 

#42

$0.8 B CONTRACT 

#42

12,871 NUMBER OF 

#35

$0.9 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 4% Research and

Development: 14%

Supplies and

Equipment: 35%

Service: 47%

By Service 

Army

6%

Navy/Marines

84%

Air Force

2%

Other Defense

8%

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 9%

Active Duty: 25% National 

Guard: 24%

Civilian: 41%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

23%

Navy/Marines

66%

Air Force

10%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Raytheon Technologies $177.8 M

Systems Engineering Associates $60.8 M

McLaughlin Research Corp. $39.7 M

Rite-Solutions $34.6 M

Mikel, Inc. $30.7 M

Leidos $22.0 M

SAIC $15.1 M

Northrop Grumman $14.8 M

Network and Simulation Technologies $11.9 M

Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corp. $11.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.8 $0.8

FY14

$0.7 $0.7 $0.7

FY16

$0.6 $0.6 $0.6

FY15 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$923.2 MILLION 12,871

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Newport 2,538 4,768 136 891 8,333

Washington ND 288 1,160 42 ND 

Kent 62 63 1,225 ND ND 

Providence 111 199 477 265 1,052

Bristol ND ND 78 0 ND 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

RHODE ISLAND FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Newport

Washington

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Newport

Washington

Providence

Kent

Bristol

(M = millions)

$616.9 M

$56.7 M

$50.1 M

$14.2 M

$11.3 M

Newport

Washington

Kent

Providence

Bristol

$740.0 M

$64.2 M

$53.1 M

$52.2 M

$2.6 M

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Newport

Washington

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 97

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
98 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

SOUTH CAROLINA 

#27

$6.1 B SPENT IN 

#23

2.2% OF STATE GDP

1.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,179

PER RESIDENT 

#27

$3.1 B CONTRACT 

#10

66,589 NUMBER OF 

#16

$3.1 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 9%

Supplies and

Equipment: 24%

Service: 65%

By Service 

Army

18%

Navy/Marines

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

14%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 11%

National 

Guard: 16%

Civilian: 17%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

22%

Other Defense

1%

Research and

Development: 3%

51%

Active Duty: 56%

40%

37%

Top Defense Contractors 

Scientific Research Corp.

Amentum Services, Inc.

UNAKA Corp.

Detyens Shipyards

KBR

SAIC

Harbert International

Atlas Technologies, Inc.

US Foods Holding

BAE Systems

(M = millions)

$142.2 M

$115.9 M

$107.2 M

$94.6 M

$92.9 M

$78.5 M

$49.7 M

$49.6 M

$47.1 M

$46.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$3.2 $3.1 $3.1 $3.1

$2.8

FY14

$2.6

FY16

$2.5 $2.5

FY15 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$3.1 BILLION 66,589

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Richland 8,879 3,454 3,356

Charleston 3,980 5,033 886

Beaufort 10,478 1,252 110 

Berkeley 7,566 315 156

Sumter 5,945 832 135 

Greenville 75 257 678

York ND 18 240 

Spartanburg 14 ND 245 

Florence 32 ND 232 

Anderson ND ND 370 

Reserve

2,092

3,102

51 

ND 

189 

852 

214 

163

117 

0 

Total

17,781

13,001

11,891

ND 

7,101

1,862

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

SOUTH CAROLINA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Anderson

Florence

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Charleston

Berkeley

Sumter

Richland

Greenville

Beaufort

Marion

Lexington

Dorchester

Spartanburg

(M = millions)

$1.2 B

$410.4 M

$368.8 M

$328.0 M

$189.5 M

$128.8 M

$127.2 M

$88.0 M 

$60.4 M

$31.9 M

Charleston

Richland

Sumter

Berkeley

Beaufort

Greenville

Anderson

York

Lexington

Florence

$821.3 M

$747.1 M

$470.4 M

$437.1 M

$343.0 M

$63.4 M

$15.5 M

$12.1 M

$10.3 M

$9.4 M

Greenville

Spartanburg

Richland

Marion

Sumter

Berkeley

Dorchester

Lexington

Charleston

Beaufort

Greenville

York

Richland

Sumter Lexington

Berkeley

Charleston

Beaufort

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 9

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

9
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

FY14 

$0.3 $0.3 $0.3

$0.2 $0.2

FY18 FY19 FY20

$0.2

$0.1

FY15

SOUTH DAKOTA 

#49

$0.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#45

1.0% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$718

PER RESIDENT 

#48

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#47

9,638 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#46

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Development: 3%

Service: 27%

Supplies and

Equipment: 62%

By Service 

Army

31%

Navy/Marines

17%

Air Force

29%

Other Defense

22%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 4%

Active Duty: 36%

National 

Guard: 44%

Civilian: 15%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

44%

Navy/Marines

1%

Air Force

55%

Other Defense

0%

Construction: 8%

Top Defense Contractors 

Sterling Computers

Black Hills Ammunition, Inc.

Rosenbauer Beteiligungsverwaltung

Walsh Group

Bristol Bay Native Corp.

National Presto Industries

Board of Regents South Dakota

SAIC

BH Services, Inc.

FSB - Pond, JV

(M = millions)

$75.1 M

$27.2 M

$16.2 M

$8.6 M

$5.5 M

$5.2 M

$4.4 M

$4.1 M

$3.8 M

$3.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.4

FY16 FY17 FY21

$417.7 MILLION 9,638

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Meade 3,296 11 115 

Minnehaha 26 359 1,547

Pennington ND 867 927 

Codington 0 ND 231 

Brown 0 ND 146

Davison 0 48 170 

Hughes 0 46 151 

Hutchinson 0 0 131 

Lake 0 0 128 

Clay ND ND 99 

Reserve

23 

306

ND 

0 

80 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Total

3,445

2,238

ND 

ND 

ND 

218 

197 

131 

128 

ND 

100
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

SOUTH DAKOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Codington Meade

Pennington

Buffalo

Aurora

Minnehaha

Davison

Charles Mix

Lincoln

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Brown

Meade

Deuel Hughes

Pennington Minnehaha

Shannon

Yankton

Union

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Union

Meade

Pennington

Minnehaha

Deuel

Hughes

Yankton

Brown

Codington

Shannon

(M = millions)

$79.9 M 

$62.1 M

$43.0 M

$23.1 M

$8.8 M 

$3.7 M 

$2.3 M

$482.0 K

$457.0 K

$235.6 K

Meade

Pennington

Minnehaha

Aurora

Hughes

Davison

Lincoln

Codington

Charles Mix

Buffalo

$192.6 M

$84.7 M

$79.9 M 

$8.6 M

$7.6 M

$5.4 M

$4.0 M

$4.0 M

$3.8 M 

$3.7 M 

Hughes

Hughes

Codington

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 101

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
102 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

TENNESSEE 

#34

$3.2 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#48

0.7% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$462

PER RESIDENT 

#32

$2.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#28

26,752 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#33 

$1.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Construction: 20%

Equipment: 28%

Research and

Development: 19%

Service: 32%

By Service 

Army

32%

Navy/Marines

13%

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

38%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 9% Reserve: 20%

Civilian: 25%

National Guard: 47%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

61%

Navy/Marines

19%

Air Force

18%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

BAE Systems

Bechtel Group

FedEx

Chemring Group

Alon USA LP

Jacobs

Integration Innovation, Inc.

Tevet

ECI Defense Group

Barrett Firearms Mfg, Inc.

(M = millions)

$451.7 M

$277.4 M

$239.2 M

$88.7 M

$87.3 M

$85.9 M

$49.5 M

$33.7 M

$30.1 M

$25.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.0

FY19

$2.3 $2.1

FY20

$2.0 $1.8 $1.5 $1.6 $1.4

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY21

$1.2 BILLION 26,752

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Shelby 1,476 2,537 1,380

Davidson 426 1,145 2,385

Blount 20 96 1,720

Rutherford 23 126 904 

Knox 90 362 191 

Montgomery 57 1,249 53 

Hamilton 52 99 386

Coffee 47 474 267

Washington 38 34 72 

Gibson 0 35 360

Reserve

1,226

1,378

ND 

468

789 

ND 

790 

ND 

337 

0 

Total

6,619

5,334

ND 

1,521

1,432

ND 

1,327

ND 

481 

395 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

TENNESSEE 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Rutherford Washington

Madison Blount Coffee

Shelby Hamilton

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Montgomery Sullivan

Davidson Anderson

Knox

Williamson Coffee

Shelby Hardeman Franklin

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Sullivan

Shelby

Coffee

Williamson

Hardeman

Montgomery

Davidson

Franklin

Knox

Anderson

(M = millions)

$470.2 M

$453.3 M

$445.8 M

$102.1 M

$89.0 M 

$64.9 M

$54.4 M

$53.4 M

$48.0 M

$46.9 M

Shelby

Davidson

Montgomery

Blount

Coffee

Knox

Rutherford

Hamilton

Madison

Washington

$411.9 M

$238.4 M

$92.9 M

$67.6 M

$51.2 M

$48.2 M

$48.0 M

$36.4 M

$12.5 M

$11.0 M

Montgomery

Davidson

Knox

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 103

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
104 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

TEXAS 

#3 

$47.3 B SPENT IN 

#22

2.2% OF STATE GDP

8.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,601

PER RESIDENT 

#3 

$35.1 B CONTRACT 

#3 

221,892 NUMBER 

#3 

$12.2 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 1% Development: 5%

Service: 32%

Supplies and

Equipment: 62%

By Service 

Army

22%

Navy/Marines

35%

Air Force

20%

Other Defense

23%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 15%

National Active Duty: 53%

Guard: 10%

Civilian: 22%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

61%

Navy/Marines

9%

Air Force

28%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Lockheed Martin

McKesson

Bell Boeing Joint Project Office

L3Harris Technologies

Amentum Services, Inc.

Raytheon Technologies

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.

Dell

Petromax Refining Co.

Marathon Petroleum

(M = millions, B = billions)

$13.7 B

$3.0 B

$2.4 B

$2.1 B

$1.1 B

$1.0 B

$757.5 M

$461.3 M

$425.0 M

$393.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$68.2

$41.8 $39.1 $40.4

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

$35.1 $28.7 $25.4 $18.6

FY21

$12.2 BILLION 221,892

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Bexar 33,185 23,250 2,922 9,472 68,829

Bell 33,766 5,303 707 861 40,637

El Paso 26,023 3,958 1,136 1,931 33,048

Tarrant 1,087 2,652 1,644 6,504 11,887

Harris 742 732 3,246 3,991 8,711

Dallas 526 934 2,316 3,720 7,496

Wichita 5,108 1,145 145 133 6,531

Nueces 1,388 3,786 98 483 5,755

Taylor 4,413 505 204 351 5,473

Travis 478 1,025 2,658 1,211 5,372
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR TEXAS 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶs, B = billions)

dĂƌƌĂŶƚ

ΨϭϮ͘Ϭ

ĂůůĂƐ WŽƚƚĞƌ

Ψϳ͘κ

ĞdžĂƌ

$3.9 B 

ŽůůŝŶ

,ĂƌƌŝƐ

,ƵŶƚ ΨϮ͘ρ ůWĂƐŽ ĂůůĂƐ dĂƌƌĂŶƚ WŽƚƚĞƌ

ΨϮ͘κ

tŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶ ,ƵŶƚ dƌĂǀŝƐ Ψϭ͘ϯ

ŽůůŝŶ

Ψϭ͘ϭ ĞdžĂƌ ,ĂƌƌŝƐ

tŝůůŝĂŵƐŽŶ

Ψρϭε͘ϭD

ůWĂƐŽ

ΨρϬς͘ϭD

dƌĂǀŝƐ

ΨκϯϮ͘ϬD

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

ĞdžĂƌ

Ψκ͘ϯ

Ğůů

ΨϮ͘κ

ůWĂƐŽ tŝĐŚŝƚĂ

Ψϭ͘ε

dĂƌƌĂŶƚ

Ψρϭς͘ϯD ůWĂƐŽ ĂůůĂƐ dĂƌƌĂŶƚ EƵĞĐĞƐ dĂLJůŽƌ Ψϯες͘εD

Ğůů ,ĂƌƌŝƐ dƌĂǀŝƐ Ψϯϭκ͘ϮD

dĂLJůŽƌ

Ψϯϭϭ͘ϬD ĞdžĂƌ ,ĂƌƌŝƐ

dƌĂǀŝƐ

ΨϯϭϬ͘κD

EƵĞĐĞƐ ĂůůĂƐ

ΨϮϳϳ͘ΘD

tŝĐŚŝƚĂ

ΨϮςε͘ϯD

&ĐƚŝǀĞ&'ƵĂƌĚ&ZĞƐĞƌǀĞƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞDĐƚŝǀĞEĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞt,^

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϮϭ ϭϬρ

;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶs, B = billions)
106 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

UTAH 

#26

$6.3 B SPENT IN 

#18

2.7% OF STATE GDP

1.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,877

PER RESIDENT 

#24

$4.3 B CONTRACT 

#25

32,842 NUMBER OF 

#23

$2.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 4% Research and

Development: 32% Supplies and

Equipment: 34%

Service: 29%

By Service 

Army

15%

Navy/Marines

26%

Air Force

51%

Other Defense

8%

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 15% Active Duty: 14%

National 

Guard: 22%

Civilian: 49%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

33%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

61%

Other Defense

4%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Northrop Grumman $2.1 B

L3Harris Technologies $625.0 M

Carahsoft Technology $102.9 M

Utah State University $99.5 M

Moog $67.8 M

HHI Corp. $66.8 M

Boeing $66.0 M

Hensel Phelps Construction $59.3 M

SAIC $50.8 M

Engineering and Software System Solutions, Inc. $36.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.3

$2.4 $2.3 $1.9 $1.5 $1.6 $1.3 $1.2

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$2.0 BILLION 32,842

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Davis 4,288 13,664 ND 1,325 ND 

Salt Lake 205 1,201 4,670 2,715 8,791

Tooele 22 1,127 148 0 1,297

Utah 51 42 1,007 153 1,253

Weber 48 114 347 470 979 

Washington ND 17 306 50 ND 

Cache 11 ND 94 68 ND 

Box Elder ND 52 87 0 ND 

Sanpete 0 ND 108 0 ND 

Iron ND ND 100 0 ND 
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

UTAH 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Iron

Washington

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Cache

Box Elder Weber

Summit Davis

Tooele

Wasatch Utah

Sanpete

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Salt Lake

Weber

Davis

Cache

Tooele

Utah

Box Elder

Summit

Wasatch

Sanpete

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.7 B

$1.2 B

$1.1 B

$121.9 M

$90.6 M

$73.3 M 

$57.8 M

$4.2 M

$1.9 M

$1.3 M

Davis

Salt Lake

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Washington

Cache

Box Elder

Iron

Sanpete

$1.4 B

$358.9 M

$91.0 M

$41.2 M

$32.8 M

$8.9 M 

$7.1 M

$6.5 M

$2.9 M

$2.8 M

Salt Lake

Salt Lake

Cache

Box Elder

Davis

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Sanpete

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 107

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
108 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

VERMONT 

#50

$0.5 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#32

1.4% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$845

PER RESIDENT 

#46

$0.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#51

4,214 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#51

$0.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0%

Research and

Development: 6% 

Service: 7%

Supplies and Equipment: 86%

By Service 

Army

24%

Navy/Marines

20%

Air Force

15%

Other Defense

42%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 6% Active Duty: 3%

Civilian: 15%

National Guard: 76%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

65%

Navy/Marines

2%

Air Force

32%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Raytheon Technologies

Marvell Government Solutions LLC

General Dynamics

Galvion Ballistics Ltd.

Avera Semiconductor

New England Woodcraft

IBM

Vermont Aerospace Industries

Norwich University

Kaman Corp.

(M = millions)

$115.2 M

$74.9 M

$50.2 M

$19.1 M

$14.9 M

$9.5 M

$8.3 M

$3.9 M

$3.3 M

$2.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.5 $0.5 $0.5

$0.4

FY16

$0.3

FY17 FY18

$0.3 $0.3

$0.2

FY14 FY15 FY19 FY20 FY21

$196.2 MILLION 4,214

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Chittenden 84 570 2,153

Washington 35 12 323 

Rutland 0 11 89 

Windsor ND 16 66

Addison ND 11 92 

Franklin 0 ND 83 

Orange 0 0 80 

Windham ND 13 50 

Bennington 0 0 58 

Caledonia 0 ND 54 

Reserve

0 

0 

168

78 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

0 

Total

2,807

370 

268

ND 

ND 

ND 

80 

ND 

58 

ND 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Windsor

Rutland

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Orleans

Caledonia

Chittenden

Washington

Addison Orange

Windsor

Rutland

Bennington Windham

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Chittenden

Addison

Orleans

Rutland

Washington

Caledonia

Bennington

Windham

Windsor

Orange

(M = millions)

$181.6 M

$116.4 M

$19.2 M

$12.0 M

$5.1 M

$4.5 M

$4.1 M

$2.1 M

$1.1 M

$294.1 K

Chittenden

Washington

Rutland

Windsor

Addison

Franklin

Orange

Windham

Caledonia

Bennington

$137.3 M

$17.5 M

$10.9 M

$5.9 M

$4.2 M

$4.2 M

$2.9 M

$2.8 M

$2.5 M

$2.0 M

Caledonia Chittenden

Washington

Addison Orange

Franklin

Bennington Windham

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 10

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

9

FISCAL YEAR 2018 VERMONT 
110 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

VIRGINIA 

#1

$62.7 B SPENT IN 

#1

10.2% OF STATE

11.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$7,259

PER RESIDENT 

#1

$42.6 B CONTRACT 

#2

251,230 NUMBER 

#1

$20.1 B PERSONNEL 

STATE GDP DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 2% Development: 9% 

Supplies and

Equipment: 28%

Service: 61%

By Service 

Army

17%

Navy/Marines

39%

Air Force

15%

Other Defense

30%

Top Defense Contractors 

Huntington Ingalls

Leidos

Northrop Grumman

General Dynamics

CACI

Booz Allen Hamilton

Atlantic Diving Supply

SAIC

Lockheed Martin

Peraton Corp.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$4.1 B

$1.5 B

$1.3 B

$1.2 B

$1.2 B

$1.2 B

$987.1 M

$899.8 M

$696.9 M

$593.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$43.8 $42.6 $40.4

$34.3 $35.8 $33.0

FY14

$28.6 $29.3

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 7%

National Guard: 3%

Civilian: 40% Active Duty: 50%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

21%

Navy/Marines

59%

Air Force

9%

Other Defense

10%

$20.1 BILLION 251,230

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Norfolk City 49,686 17,140 303 1,078 68,207

Virginia Beach City 21,529 3,884 799 4,694 30,906

Fairfax 6,643 12,430 694 2,909 22,676

Arlington 2,712 16,264 73 116 19,165

Portsmouth City 3,775 13,657 161 17 17,610

Prince William 7,919 4,498 286 823 13,526

Prince George 7,456 3,494 0 462 11,412

Newport News City 6,441 3,746 75 1,081 11,343

York 8,045 678 1,055 952 10,730

Accomack 6,908 106 98 765 7,877
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

VIRGINIA 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Fairfax

Newport News City

Arlington

Norfolk City

Virginia Beach City

Prince William

Alexandria City

Loudoun

Portsmouth City

Chesapeake City

(M = millions, B = billions)

$17.5 B

$4.3 B

$3.9 B 

$2.9 B

$2.2 B

$2.2 B

$1.7 B

$1.4 B

$767.6 M

$748.7 M

Norfolk City

Fairfax

Arlington

Virginia Beach City

Portsmouth City

Accomack

Prince William

Newport News City

King George

York

$4.9 B

$2.3 B

$2.3 B

$2.1 B

$1.4 B

$1.1 B

$881.9 M

$800.2 M

$683.0 M

$675.5 M

Loudoun

Fairfax

Arlington

Alexandria City

Prince William

Newport News City Norfolk City

Virginia Beach City

Portsmouth City

Chesapeake City

Fairfax

Arlington

Prince William

Accomack

King George

York

Norfolk City

Virginia Beach City

Newport News City

Portsmouth City

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 111

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
112 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

WASHINGTON 

#9 

$19.1 B SPENT IN 

#17

2.7% OF STATE GDP

3.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,470

PER RESIDENT 

#12

$11.7 B CONTRACT 

#7 

110,887 NUMBER 

#7 

$7.4 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 1%

Development: 3% 

Service: 16%

Supplies and Equipment: 80%

By Service 

Army

4%

Navy/Marines

35%

Air Force

55%

Other Defense

6%

Top Defense Contractors 

Boeing

ANA Holdings, Inc.

General Dynamics

Parker-Hannifin

PacMed

SAFE Boats International

Par Pacific Holdings

Skookum Educational Programs

Microsoft

Garco Construction, Inc.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$7.7 B

$980.7 M

$244.1 M

$221.8 M

$172.1 M

$89.7 M

$87.9 M

$83.8 M

$74.6 M

$58.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$11.7 $11.0 $9.7 $9.8

FY15 FY16

$8.6

FY17 FY18 FY19

$7.5 $6.0

$3.0

FY14 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 9%

National Guard: 7%

Civilian: 29%

Active Duty: 56%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

43%

Navy/Marines

45%

Air Force

11%

Other Defense

1%

$7.4 BILLION 110,887

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Pierce

Kitsap

Island

Spokane

Snohomish

King

Walla Walla

Yakima

Clark

Thurston

Active Civilian

Duty

31,246

4,700

7,246

3,585

724 

421 

ND 

84 

48 

77 

7,159

19,296

814 

981 

665

872 

1,079

299 

79 

62

National

Guard

3,009

106

0 

1,566

325 

1,038

43 

541 

191 

205 

Reserve

5,269

807 

688

693

1,250

116

0 

129 

513 

ND 

Total

46,683

24,909

8,748

6,825

2,964

2,447

ND 

1,053

ND 

831 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

WASHINGTON FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Island

Thurston

Clark

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Skagit

Snohomish

Spokane King

Pierce

Cowlitz

Clark

Klickitat

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

King

Pierce

Kitsap

Snohomish

Klickitat

Spokane

Island

Clark

Cowlitz

Skagit

(M = millions, B = billions)

$8.5 B

$1.5 B

$789.1 M

$297.3 M

$197.0 M

$107.8 M

$76.9 M

$59.3 M

$36.8 M

$34.0 M

Pierce

Kitsap

Island

Spokane

Snohomish

King

Yakima

Walla Walla

Clark

Thurston

$2.9 B

$2.0 B

$586.6 M

$360.5 M

$167.8 M

$165.1 M

$45.7 M

$41.1 M

$31.1 M

$20.8 M

Kitsap

Island

Snohomish

Spokane

Pierce

Kitsap King Spokane

Yakima

Walla Walla

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 113

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
114 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

WEST VIRGINIA 

#46

$0.9 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#47

1.0% OF STATE GDP

0.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$496

PER RESIDENT 

#44

$0.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#46

9,728 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#48

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0%

Research and

Development: 3% 

Service: 16%

Supplies and Equipment: 81%

By Service 

Army

47%

Navy/Marines

33%

Air Force

12%

Other Defense

9%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 1%

Reserve: 15%

Civilian: 20%

National Guard: 63%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

71%

Navy/Marines

2%

Air Force

26%

Other Defense

0%

Top Defense Contractors 

Northrop Grumman

Boeing

AERO International

Raytheon Technologies

True North Enterprises LLC

SMR Technologies

NextGen Federal Systems

4D Tech Solutions, Inc. 

Leidos

STS International

(M = millions)

$293.8 M

$57.8 M

$20.7 M

$18.1 M

$14.5 M

$10.6 M

$9.7 M

$6.9 M

$6.0 M

$4.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.6

$0.5 $0.5

$0.4

$0.3 $0.3

FY15 FY16

$0.2 $0.2

FY14 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$379.8 MILLION 9,728

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Kanawha 18 433 1,531

Berkeley ND 245 1,333

Preston 0 60 490 

Cabell 28 550 0 

Putnam ND 109 386

Wood ND 58 320 

Fayette ND 12 413 

Ohio ND 82 117 

Wayne 0 38 168

Harrison 21 43 123 

Reserve

329 

25 

67

ND 

60

82 

ND 

113 

64

69

Total

2,311

ND 

617

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

270 

256
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

WEST VIRGINIA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Ohio

Preston

Wood

Putnam

Wayne Fayette

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Monongalia Morgan

Mineral Berkeley

Jefferson

Nicholas

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Mineral

Harrison

Monongalia

Jefferson

Kanawha

Nicholas

Berkeley

Mason

Morgan

Cabell

(M = millions)

$302.9 M

$77.5 M

$22.3 M

$21.0 M

$11.7 M

$10.6 M

$8.9 M 

$5.4 M

$5.0 M

$3.7 M 

Kanawha

Berkeley

Cabell

Preston

Putnam

Wood

Harrison

Fayette

Ohio

Wayne

$104.2 M

$61.1 M

$48.0 M

$23.3 M

$22.1 M

$16.8 M

$10.6 M

$10.6 M

$10.0 M

$8.8 M 

Harrison Mason

Kanawha

Cabell

Cabell

Berkeley

Harrison

Kanawha

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 11

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

5
116 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

WISCONSIN 

#29

$5.1 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#35

1.3% OF STATE GDP

0.9%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$857

PER RESIDENT 

#23

$4.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#36

17,384 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#41

$0.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 2% Development: 1%

Service: 10%

Supplies and Equipment: 88%

By Service 

Army

31%

Navy/Marines

29%

Air Force

26%

Other Defense

14%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 4%

Reserve: 26% Civilian: 16%

National Guard: 54%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

77%

Navy/Marines

6%

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Oshkosh Corp.

Fincantieri Group

National Presto Industries

Enpro Industries, Inc.

Logistics Health, Inc.

Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance

UnitedHealth Group

Advantage Federal Resourcing, Inc.

Leonardo SpA

General Electric

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.1 B

$562.4 M

$251.1 M

$99.5 M

$90.5 M

$79.4 M

$62.6 M

$58.3 M

$55.8 M

$54.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.9

FY20

$4.3 $4.5

$3.0 $3.0

FY16

$2.6 $2.1

$1.3

FY14 FY15 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY21

$593.9 MILLION 17,384

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Dane 139 645 2,424

Milwaukee 233 389 1,257

Monroe 278 1,142 227 

Juneau 0 165 726

Brown 19 28 132 

Waukesha ND 0 324 

Winnebago 34 0 170 

Fond du Lac ND 0 325 

Marathon ND 23 163

La Crosse ND ND 145 

Reserve

755 

1,046

701 

0 

573 

155 

228 

87 

184 

157 

Total

3,963

2,925

2,348

891 

752 

ND 

432 

ND 

ND 

ND 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

WISCONSIN FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Juneau

Marathon

Brown

Dane

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Monroe

La Crosse

Marinette

Outagamie

Winnebago

Dane

Rock

Kenosha

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Winnebago

Marinette

Rock

Waukesha

Dane

Milwaukee

La Crosse

Monroe

Outagamie

Kenosha

(M = millions)

$2.1 B

$565.3 M

$350.6 M

$339.7 M 

$205.6 M

$170.3 M

$162.3 M

$97.3 M 

$58.0 M

$49.7 M

Dane

Monroe

Milwaukee

Juneau

Brown

Waukesha

Winnebago

Buffalo

La Crosse

Marathon

$159.9 M

$134.9 M

$103.5 M

$31.6 M

$15.7 M

$10.9 M

$10.7 M

$8.9 M 

$8.1 M

$7.7 M 

La Crosse

Monroe

Buffalo

Winnebago

Waukesha

Milwaukee

Waukesha

Milwaukee

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 11

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

7
118 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

WYOMING 

#51

$0.5 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#43

1.1% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$822

PER RESIDENT 

#51

$0.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#49

7,345 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#49

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and 

Equipment: 11%

Service: 57%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

1%

Air Force

Other Defense

8%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 3%

National 

Guard: 39%

Civilian: 15%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

27%

Navy/Marines

1%

Air Force

Other Defense

1%

72%

Construction: 31%

Research and

Development: 1%

39%

52%

Active Duty: 43%

Top Defense Contractors 

M1 Support Services

Fluor Corp.

Broncho Co.

Green Contracting Co., Inc.

Native American Services Corp.

American Contracting

IT Consulting Partners LLC

Test Range Systems LLC

Umyuaq Construction

High West Energy, Inc.

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.2 $0.2

$0.1 $0.1 $0.1 $0.1

FY18 FY19

$0.1 $0.1

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY20 FY21

$350.9 MILLION 7,345

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Laramie 3,103 1,013 1,839

Platte 58 75 191 

Natrona ND ND 76

Albany 11 ND 118 

Uinta 0 ND 87 

Fremont 0 ND 81 

Campbell 0 ND 79 

Sheridan 0 ND 63

Goshen 0 0 74 

Lincoln 0 ND 61

(M = millions)

$24.9 M

$11.4 M

$8.1 M

$7.9 M

$6.1 M

$4.8 M

$4.7 M

$4.6 M

$4.3 M

$2.4 M

Reserve

114 

0 

60

0 

0 

0 

0 

12 

0 

0 

Total

6,069

324 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

74 

ND 
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 WYOMING

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Campbell

Sheridan

Fremont Natrona

Lincoln Goshen

Platte

Albany

Uinta

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Park

Sheridan

Teton

Fremont Natrona

Sublette

Platte

Albany

Sweetwater

Laramie

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Laramie

Sheridan

Sublette

Natrona

Platte

Albany

Teton

Park

Sweetwater

Fremont

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$101.3 M

$7.1 M

$2.7 M

$2.5 M

$2.3 M

$818.2 K

$812.0 K

$773.4 K

$183.6 K

$125.4 K

Laramie

Platte

Albany

Natrona

Sheridan

Fremont

Uinta

Campbell

Lincoln

Goshen

$318.8 M

$12.2 M

$4.9 M

$1.9 M

$1.6 M

$1.5 M

$1.2 M

$1.1 M

$967.9 K

Laramie

$3.4 M

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 11

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

9
120 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

APPENDIX 1: MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

Joint

Service County Base 

Joint

Site Service County Base Site 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

ALABAMA ARIZONA 

AASF02 Birmingham Army Guard Jefferson Air Force Plant 44 AF Active Pima

Anniston Army Depot Army Active Calhoun Barry Goldwater Range MC Active Yuma

Birmingham Airport AF Guard Jefferson Buckeye TS Army Guard Maricopa

Fort McClellan ARNG Training Center Army Guard Calhoun Camp Navajo Army Guard Coconino

Fort Rucker AL Army Active Dale Davis-Monthan Air Force Base AF Active Pima

Maxwell AFB AF Active Montgomery Florence Military Reservation Army Guard Pinal

Montgomery JFHQ AFRC / CSMS 01 Army Guard Montgomery Fort Huachuca Army Active Cochise

Montgomery Regional Airport ANGB AF Guard Montgomery Luke AFB AF Active Maricopa

Redstone Arsenal Army Active Madison Marine Corps Air Station Yuma MC Active Yuma

RW Shepherd Hope Hull Army Guard Montgomery Naval Observatory Flagstaff Station Navy Active Coconino

Papago Military Reservation Army Guard Maricopa

ALASKA Picacho Aviation TS Army Guard Pinal

Alcantra Armory Complex Army Guard Matanuska-Susitna Silver Bell Army Heliport Army Guard Pinal

Clear Air Force Station AF Active Denali Sky Harbor IAP AF Guard Maricopa

Eareckson Air Force Station AF Active Aleutians West The Barry M Goldwater Air Force Range AF Active Maricopa

Eielson Air Force Base AF Active Fairbanks North Star Tucson IAP AF Guard Pima

Fort Greely Army Active Southeast Fairbanks Yuma Proving Ground Army Active La Paz

Fort Wainwright Army Active Fairbanks North Star

Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson AF Active Anchorage ARKANSAS 

King Salmon Air Force Station AF Active Bristol Bay Camp Joseph T Robinson Army Guard Faulkner

Southeast Alaska Acoustic Measurent Facility Navy Active Ketchikan Gateway Fort Chaffee MTC Army Guard Sebastian

Yukon Weapons Range AF Active Fairbanks North Star Fort Smith MAP AF Guard Sebastian
121

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

Little Rock AFB AF Active Pulaski COLORADO 

Pine Bluff Arsenal Army Active Jefferson Buckley Air Force Base AF Active Arapahoe

Cheyenne Mountain Air Force Station AF Active El Paso

CALIFORNIA Fort Carson Army Active El Paso

Air Force Plant 42 AF Active Los Angeles Peterson Air Force Base AF Active El Paso

Amphib Base Coronado East Navy Active San Diego Pueblo Chemical Depot Army Active Pueblo

Amphib Base Coronado West Navy Active San Diego Schriever Air Force Base AF Active El Paso

Balboa Hospital Navy Active San Diego USAF Academy AF Active El Paso

Beale Air Force Base AF Active Yuba

Broadway Complex Navy Active San Diego CONNECTICUT 

Camp Michael Monsoor Navy Active San Diego Bradley IAP AF Guard Hartford

Channel Islands ANG Station AF Guard Ventura Camp Hartell Army Guard Hartford

Edwards Air Force Base AF Active Kern Camp Nett Army Guard New London

Fort Hunter Liggett Army Reserve Monterey Naval Submarine Base New London Navy Active New London

Fort Irwin Army Active San Bernardino Stones Ranch Military Res Army Guard New London

Fresno Yosemite International ANG AF Guard Fresno

ITC Camp San Luis Obisbo Army Guard San Luis Obispo DELAWARE 

Long Beach Fuel Complex Navy Active Los Angeles Bethany Beach Training Site Army Guard Sussex

Los Alamitos JFTB Army Guard Orange Dover AFB AF Active Kent

Los Angeles Air Force Base AF Active Los Angeles New Castle Airport AF Guard New Castle

March ARB AF Reserve Riverside River Road Training Site Army Guard New Castle

Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center MC Active San Bernardino

Marine Corps Air Station Miramar MC Active San Diego DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Army Reserve San Diego Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling Navy Active District of Columbia

MCLB Barstow MC Active San Bernardino Naval Observatory Navy Active District of Columbia

MCRD San Diego MC Active San Diego Naval Research Laboratory Navy Active District of Columbia

Military Ocean Terminal Concord Army Active Contra Costa Naval Support Activity Washington Navy Active District of Columbia

Mountain Warfare Training Center MC Active Mono

MTC-H Camp Roberts Army Guard San Luis Obispo FLORIDA 

NAF El Centro Navy Active Imperial Arbuckle Airfield AF Active Polk

NAS Lemoore CA Navy Active Kings Avon Park AF Range AF Active Polk

NAVBASE Coronado Navy Active San Diego Cape Canaveral Air Force Station AF Active Brevard

NAVBASE Point Loma Navy Active San Diego Destin Moreno Point Army Active Okaloosa

NAVBASE San Diego Navy Active San Diego Eglin Air Force Base AF Active Walton

NAVBASE Ventura County -Point Mugu Navy Active Ventura FLC Fuel Depot Heckscher Navy Active Duval

NAVBASE Ventura County -Port Hueneme Navy Active Ventura Homestead ARB AF Reserve Miami-Dade

NAVPMOSSP Mtn View Navy Active Santa Clara Hurlburt Field AF Active Okaloosa

NAVSUPPACT Monterey CA Navy Active Monterey Jacksonville FL Maint MC Reserve Duval

NAVWPNSTA Seal Beach Navy Active Orange Jacksonville IAP AF Guard Duval

Navy Annex Navy Active Monterey MacDill Air Force Base AF Active Hillsborough

NAWS China Lake Navy Active Inyo MCSF Blount Island (FL) MC Active Duval

NIWC Pacific Navy Active San Diego NAS Jacksonville FL Navy Active Duval

Norwalk 2 AF Reserve Los Angeles NAS Key West FL Navy Active Monroe

Old Town Site 1 Navy Active San Diego NAS Pensacola FL Navy Active Escambia

Ozol Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Contra Costa Naval Hospital Navy Active Monroe

Parks Reserve Forces Tng Area Army Reserve Alameda Naval Support Activity Orlando Navy Active Orange

Presidio of Monterey Army Active Monterey Naval Support Activity Panama City Navy Active Bay

San Nicolas Island Navy Active Ventura NAVSTA Mayport FL Navy Active Duval

San Pedro Fuel Depot Navy Active Los Angeles Patrick Air Force Base AF Active Brevard

Santa Cruz Island Navy Active Santa Barbara Simulation and Training Technology Center Army Active Orange

Sierra Army Depot Army Active Lassen Snake Creek TS Miramar Army Guard Broward

Travis Air Force Base AF Active Solano Tyndall Air Force Base AF Active Bay

Vandenberg Air Force Base AF Active Santa Barbara

Warner Springs Remote Training Site Navy Active San Diego

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021
122 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

GEORGIA Grissom ARB AF Reserve Miami

Air Force Plant 6 AF Active Cobb Hulman Fld AF Guard Vigo

Atlanta United Ave Army Guard Fulton Indianapolis 38 ID Army Guard Marion

Camp Frank D Merrill Army Active Lumpkin Knightstown Army Guard Rush

Cumming Army Guard Forsyth Muscatatuck Urban Training Center Army Guard Jennings

Dobbins ARB AF Reserve Cobb Naval Support Activity Crane Navy Active Martin

Fort Benning Army Active Chattahoochee Shelbyville Army Guard Shelby

Fort Gordon Army Active Richmond

Fort Stewart Army Active Liberty IOWA 

General Lucius D Clay National Guard Center Army Guard Cobb Camp Dodge Johnston TS Army Guard Polk

Hunter Army Airfield Army Active Chatham Des Moines IAP AF Guard Polk

Macon Readiness Center Army Guard Bibb Iowa AAP Army Active Des Moines

MCLB Albany MC Active Dougherty Sioux Gateway Airport AF Guard Woodbury

Moody Air Force Base AF Active Lowndes

Naval Submarine Base Kings Bay Navy Active Camden KANSAS 

Oglethorpe Armory Army Guard Clayton Forbes Field ANG AF Guard Shawnee

Robins AFB AF Active Houston Fort Leavenworth Army Active Leavenworth

Savannah/Hilton Head IAP AF Guard Chatham Fort Riley Army Active Riley

VTS Catoosa Army Guard Catoosa JFHQ-Kansas Army Guard Shawnee

McConnell AFB AF Active Sedgwick

HAWAII Salina KS Training Center Army Guard Saline

Fort Shafter Army Active Honolulu Smoky Hill ANG Range AF Guard Saline

Ft Ruger Army Guard Honolulu

Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam Navy Active Honolulu KENTUCKY 

Kalaeloa Army Guard Honolulu Blue Grass Army Depot Army Active Madison

Marine Corps Base Hawaii MC Active Honolulu Fort Knox Army Active Hardin

Optical and Supercomputing Observatory AF Active Maui Frankfort Boone NG Center Army Guard Franklin

Pacific Missile Range Facility Navy Active Kauai Louisville IAP-Standiford FL Site 1 AF Guard Jefferson

Pearl City Annex MC Active Honolulu WH Ford Regional Tng Ctr Army Guard Muhlenberg

Tripler Army Medical Center Army Active Honolulu

Tropic Regions Test Center Army Active Honolulu LOUISIANA 

TS Keaukaha Mil Res Army Guard Hawaii Barksdale AFB AF Active Bossier

Wheeler Army Airfield Army Active Honolulu Baton Rouge AFRC Army Guard East Baton Rouge

Beauregard Training Range Army Guard Rapides

IDAHO Camp Beauregard Army Guard Rapides

Boise Air Terminal AF Guard Ada Camp Minden Training Site Army Guard Webster

Mountain Home Air Force Base AF Active Elmore Camp Villere Army Guard St. Tammany

NSWCCD Acoustic Research Detachment Navy Active Kootenai Carville Gillis Long Center Army Guard Iberville

Orchard Combat Training Center Army Guard Ada Esler Field Army Guard Rapides

Saylor Creek Air Force Range AF Active Owyhee Fort Polk Army Active Vernon

Hammond Airport Army Guard Tangipahoa

ILLINOIS Jackson Barracks Army Guard Orleans

Capital Airport AF Guard Sangamon NAS JRB New Orleans Navy Active Plaquemines

General Wayne A Downing Peoria IAP AF Guard Peoria

Joliet USARC/JTA Army Reserve Will MAINE 

Marseilles (MTA Tng Area) Army Guard LaSalle Auburn Training Site Army Guard Androscoggin

Naval Station Great Lakes IL Navy Active Lake Bangor IAP AF Guard Penobscot

Rock Island Arsenal Army Active Rock Island Bangor Training Site Army Guard Penobscot

Scott AFB AF Active St. Clair Bog Brook Training Site Army Guard Oxford

Sparta Armory Army Guard Randolph DFAS Annex AF Active Aroostook

Springfield (TS Cp Lincoln) Army Guard Sangamon Hollis Plains Training Site Army Guard York

Portsmouth Naval Shipyard Navy Active York

INDIANA 

Camp Atterbury Army Guard Bartholomew
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

MARYLAND MISSISSIPPI 

Aberdeen Proving Ground Army Active Harford Camp Shelby Army Guard Perry

Adelphi Laboratory Center Army Active Montgomery CBC Gulfport MS Navy Active Harrison

Blossom Point Research Facility Army Active Charles Columbus AFB AF Active Lowndes

Chesapeake Bay Detach Navy Active Calvert CTA Camp McCain Army Guard Grenada

Fort Detrick Army Active Frederick Gulfport AVCRAD Army Guard Harrison

Fort Meade Army Active Anne Arundel Gulfport-Biloxi Regional Airport (ANG) AF Guard Harrison

Havre De Grace Military Res Army Guard Harford Jackson IAP Thompson Field AF Guard Rankin

Joint Base Andrews AF Active Prince George’s Keesler AFB AF Active Harrison

Martin State Airport AF Guard Baltimore Naval Air Station Meridian Navy Active Lauderdale

MTA Camp Fretterd Army Guard Baltimore NRL Stennis Space Center Navy Active Hancock

MTA Gunpowder Military Reservation Army Guard Baltimore OLF Bravo Navy Active Kemper

Naval Air Station Patuxent River Navy Active St. Mary’s Woolmarket (De Soto) Navy Active Harrison

Naval Support Facility Carderock Navy Active Montgomery

Naval Support Facility Indian Head Navy Active Charles MISSOURI 

NAVSUPPACT Annapolis Navy Active Anne Arundel Fort Leonard Wood Army Active Pulaski

NAVSUPPACT Bethesda MD Navy Active Montgomery Lake City AAP Army Active Jackson

NMIC Suitland Navy Active Prince George’s Macon TS Army Guard Macon

NRL Blossom Point Navy Active Charles MTA Camp Clark Nevada Army Guard Vernon

Upper Yard Annapolis Navy Active Anne Arundel MTA Camp Crowder Neosho Army Guard Newton

NGA Arnold Site AF Active Jefferson

MASSACHUSETTS Rosecrans MAP (139AG) AF Guard Buchanan

Ayer Army Guard Middlesex Springfield AVCRAD (New) Army Guard Greene

Barnes MAP (ANG) AF Guard Hampden St Louis Air Force Station AF Active St. Louis City

Cape Cod Air Force Station AF Active Barnstable TS Ike Skelton Jefferson City Army Guard Cole

Devens Reserve Forces Tng Area Army Reserve Worcester TS Mark Twain Natl Forest Wapp Army Guard Butler

Hanscom Air Force Base AF Active Middlesex Whiteman AFB AF Active Johnson

MTA Camp Curtis Guil Army Guard Essex

MTA Camp Edwards Army Guard Barnstable MONTANA 

Otis ANG Base AF Guard Barnstable Great Falls IAP AF Guard Cascade

U.S. Army Natick Soldier Systems Center Army Active Middlesex Helena Aviation RC- AASF- C12 Army Guard Lewis and Clark

Westover ARB AF Reserve Hampden Malmstrom Air Force Base AF Active Cascade

MTA Ft Wm Henry Harrison Army Guard Lewis and Clark

MICHIGAN MTA Limestone Hills Army Guard Broadwater

Alpena County Regional Airport AF Guard Alpena

CTC Fort Custer Trng Center Army Guard Kalamazoo NEBRASKA 

Detroit Arsenal Army Active Macomb Camp Ashland Army Guard Sarpy

Grayling Airfield Army Guard Crawford Grand Island AASF/RC Army Guard Hall

Lansing Joint Forces Readiness Center Army Guard Ingham Greenlief TS/UTES 01 Army Guard Clay

MTC-H Camp Grayling Army Guard Kalkaska Lincoln AASF/Readiness Center Army Guard Lancaster

Selfridge ANGB AF Guard Macomb Lincoln MAP AF Guard Lancaster

W K Kellogg AF Guard Calhoun Mead TS/FMS 06/Utes 02 Army Guard Saunders

Offutt Air Force Base AF Active Sarpy

MINNESOTA 

Arden Hills Army Training Site Army Guard Ramsey NEVADA 

Camp Ripley Army Guard Morrison Anthony Cometa Complex Army Guard Clark

Duluth IAP AF Guard St. Louis Creech Air Force Base AF Active Clark

Duluth NG Armory Army Guard St. Louis Fallon Range Complex Navy Active Churchill

Minn-St Paul AF Reserve Hennepin Floyd Edsall Training Center Army Guard Clark

Rochester NGA and OMS 2 Army Guard Olmsted Hawthorne Army Depot Army Active Mineral

Rosemount NG Armory Army Guard Dakota Nellis Air Force Base AF Active Clark

St Cloud AASF Army Guard Sherburne Nevada Test and Training Range AF Active Nye

St Cloud NG Armory Army Guard Stearns Reno Tahoe IAP AF Guard Washoe

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 123
124 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

NEW HAMPSHIRE Military Ocean Tml Sunny Point Army Active Brunswick

New Boston Air Station AF Active Hillsborough MTA Camp Butner Army Guard Granville

Newington Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Rockingham Oak Grove MC Active Jones

NG Training Site Army Guard Strafford OLF Atlantic MC Active Carteret

Pease ANGB AF Guard Rockingham Raleigh Army Guard Wake

Seymour Johnson Air Force Base AF Active Wayne

NEW JERSEY 

Atlantic City IAP AF Guard Atlantic NORTH DAKOTA 

Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst AF Active Burlington Bismarck RJB Complex Army Guard Burleigh

Lawrenceville Army Guard Mercer Camp Grafton Army Guard Eddy

Naval Weapons Station Earle NJ Navy Active Monmouth Cavalier Air Force Station AF Active Pembina

Picatinny Arsenal Army Active Morris Grand Forks AFB AF Active Grand Forks

Sea Girt NJ NGTC Army Guard Monmouth Grand Forks Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Grand Forks

Hector IAP AF Guard Cass

NEW MEXICO Minot Air Force Base AF Active Ward

Cannon AFB AF Active Curry

Holloman Air Force Base AF Active Otero OHIO 

Kirtland Air Force Base AF Active Bernalillo Beightler Armory Army Guard Franklin

Las Cruces Army Guard Doña Ana Bratenahl Navy Active Cuyahoga

Melrose Air Force Range AF Active Roosevelt Camp James A. Garfield JM Training Center Army Guard Portage

Rio Rancho TS Army Guard Sandoval Camp Perry Joint Training Center Army Guard Ottawa

Santa Fe - Onate Complex TS Army Guard Santa Fe Camp Sherman Joint Training Center Army Guard Ross

White Sands Missile Range Army Active Sierra Defense Supply Center Columbus Army Active Franklin

McConnelsville Training Site Army Guard Morgan

NEW YORK Rickenbacker Army Guard Franklin

Brooklyn NY MC Reserve Kings Rickenbacker AF Guard Franklin

Camp Smith Tng Site Army Guard Westchester Springfield Beckley AF Guard Clark

Fort Drum Army Active Jefferson Toledo/Exp Airport AF Guard Lucas

Fort Hamilton Army Active Kings U.S. Army JSMC Lima Army Active Allen

Francis S Gabreski Airport AF Guard Suffolk Wright-Patterson Air Force Base AF Active Greene

Hancock Field AF Guard Onondaga Youngstown Air Reserve Station AF Reserve Trumbull

Niagara Falls AF Reserve Niagara

NSA Saratoga Springs NY Navy Active Saratoga OKLAHOMA 

Rome Research Laboratory AF Active Oneida Altus AFB AF Active Jackson

Schenectady ANG MAP AF Guard Schenectady Camp Gruber Army Guard Muskogee

Stewart Annex Army Active Orange Fort Sill Army Active Comanche

Stewart IAP AF Guard Orange Kegelman Air Force Auxiliary Field AF Active Alfalfa

Syracuse MCRC MC Reserve Onondaga Lexington AASF No 1 Army Guard Cleveland

Verona Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Oneida McAlester AAP Army Active Pittsburg

Watervliet Arsenal Army Active Albany Muskogee AFRC Army Guard Muskogee

West Point Military Reservation Army Active Orange Norman CSMS Army Guard Cleveland

Youngstown Tng Site Army Guard Niagara Tinker Aerospace Complex AF Active Oklahoma

Tinker Air Force Base AF Active Oklahoma

NORTH CAROLINA Tulsa IAP AF Guard Tulsa

ALF Bogue MC Active Carteret Vance AFB AF Active Garfield

Army Research Lab --Raleigh Durham Army Active Durham Will Rogers World Airport AF Guard Oklahoma

Camp MacKall Army Active Scotland

Charlotte/Douglas IAP AF Guard Mecklenburg OREGON 

Dare County Range AF Active Dare Biak Training Center COUTES Army Guard Deschutes

Fort Bragg Army Active Hoke Camp Adair Corvallis Army Guard Benton

Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point MC Active Craven Camp Withycombe Clackamas Army Guard Clackamas

Marine Corps Air Station New River MC Active Onslow Kingsley Field Cantonement Site 1 AF Guard Klamath

Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune MC Active Onslow Lane County AFRC FMS 5 Army Guard Lane
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

McNary Field Salem AASF Army Guard Marion Holston Army Ammunition Plant Army Active Hawkins

MTA Camp Rilea Army Guard Clatsop Jackson Airport Armory Army Guard Madison

NAVWPNSYSTRAFAC Boardman Navy Active Morrow Johnson City Gray Army Guard Washington

McGhee Tyson Airport AF Guard Blount

PENNSYLVANIA Memphis IAP AF Guard Shelby

Cambridge Springs Readiness Center/FMS 5 Army Guard Crawford Milan AAP Army Active Gibson

Carlisle Barracks Army Active Cumberland Nashville Army Guard Davidson

Collegeville FMS 4 Army Guard Montgomery Nashville IAP AF Guard Davidson

Defense Distrib Depot Susq Army Active York NAVSUPPACT Midsouth Memphis TN Navy Active Shelby

Det Phil Pny Annex Navy Active Philadelphia Northside Mid-South Navy Active Shelby

Fort Indiantown Gap Army Guard Lebanon NSWC Carderock Div Navy Active Shelby

Hollidaysburg Readiness Center Army Guard Blair VTS Milan Army Guard Carroll

Letterkenny Army Depot Army Active Franklin VTS Smyrna Army Guard Rutherford

Naval Support Activity Philadelphia Navy Active Philadelphia

NAVSUPPACT Mechanicsburg PA Navy Active Cumberland TEXAS 

New Castle Readiness Center/FMS 9 Army Guard Lawrence Air Force Plant 4 AF Active Tarrant

Pittsburgh IAP ANG AF Guard Allegheny ALF Cabaniss Navy Active Nueces

Pittsburgh IAP ARS AF Reserve Allegheny ALF Orange Navy Active Jim Wells

Scranton AAP Army Active Lackawanna ALF Waldron Navy Active Nueces

Spring City Readiness Center Army Guard Chester Army Futures Command Army Active Travis

Tobyhanna Army Depot Army Active Monroe Bergstrom - (Abia) Army Guard Travis

Camp Bowie (State) Army Guard Brown

RHODE ISLAND Camp Mabry Army Guard Travis

Camp Fogarty Tng Site Army Guard Kent Camp Maxey Army Guard Lamar

Fort Adams RI Navy Active Newport Camp Swift Army Guard Bastrop

Gould Island RI Navy Active Newport Dixie Target Range Navy Active McMullen

Naval Station Newport Navy Active Newport Dyess AFB AF Active Taylor

Quonset State Airport AF Guard Washington Ellington Field Joint Reserve Base AF Guard Harris

Fort Bliss Army Active El Paso

SOUTH CAROLINA Fort Hood Army Active Coryell

Fort Jackson Army Active Richland Fort Wolters Army Guard Parker

Joint Base Charleston AF Active Berkeley Fort Worth - Shoreview Army Guard Tarrant

Joint Base Charleston North Field SBML AF Active Orangeburg Goodfellow AFB AF Active Tom Green

Marine Corps Air Station Beaufort MC Active Beaufort Grand Prairie Reserve Complex Army Reserve Dallas

McEntire Joint National Guard Base AF Guard Richland Joint Base San Antonio AF Active Bexar

MCRD Beaufort MC Active Beaufort Laughlin AFB AF Active Val Verde

MTA Clarks Hill Reservation Army Guard McCormick Martindale - AASF Army Guard Bexar

NAVSUPPFAC Beaufort SC Navy Active Beaufort NALF Goliad Navy Active Goliad

Poinsett Electronic Combat Range AF Active Sumter NAS Corpus Christi TX Navy Active Nueces

Shaw Air Force Base AF Active Sumter NAS Fort Worth JRB TX Navy Active Tarrant

NAS Kingsville TX Navy Active Kleberg

SOUTH DAKOTA Red River Army Depot Army Active Bowie

Camp Rapid Army Guard Pennington Saginaw Army Guard Tarrant

Ellsworth AFB AF Active Meade Sheppard AFB AF Active Wichita

Ellsworth AFB Site 2 AF Active Pennington Yankee Target Range Navy Active McMullen

Joe Foss Field AF Guard Minnehaha

Mitchell Complex Army Guard Davison UTAH 

Sioux Falls Benson Rd Complex Army Guard Minnehaha Hill Air Force Base AF Active Davis

West Camp Army Guard Pennington MTA-L Camp Williams Army Guard Utah

NAVPMOSSP Magna Utah Navy Active Salt Lake

TENNESSEE Saint George/FMS 5B Army Guard Washington

Arnold Air Force Base AF Active Coffee Salt Lake City IAP AF Guard Salt Lake

Fort Campbell Army Active Montgomery Tooele Army Depot Army Active Tooele

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 125
126 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

Tooele Army Depot South Army Active Tooele WASHINGTON 

Utah Test and Training Range AF Active Tooele Bremerton Army Guard Kitsap

West Desert Test Center Army Active Tooele CNI NAVMAG Indian Island Navy Active Jefferson

Cusick Survival Training Site AF Active Pend Oreille

VERMONT Fairchild Air Force Base AF Active Spokane

Burlington IAP AF Guard Chittenden Jim Creek Navy Active Snohomish

Ethan Allen AFB MTA Army Guard Chittenden Joint Base Lewis-McChord Army Active Pierce

TS Camp Johnson Army Guard Chittenden Manchester Navy Active Kitsap

TS Ethan Allen Range Army Guard Chittenden Marysville WA Navy Active Snohomish

Westminster Training Site Army Guard Windham Naval Air Station Whidbey Island Navy Active Island

Naval Base Kitsap Bangor Navy Active Kitsap

VIRGINIA Naval Base Kitsap Bremerton WA Navy Active Kitsap

Air Force Office of Scientific Research WHS Arlington Naval Base Kitsap --Keyport Navy Active Kitsap

ALF Fentress Chesapke Navy Active Chesapeake City NAVSTA Everett WA Navy Active Snohomish

Arlington National Cemetery Army Active Arlington OLF Coupeville Navy Active Island

Arlington Service Ctr Navy Active Arlington Sea Plane Base Navy Active Island

Camp Pendleton SMR Army Guard Virginia Beach City Shipyard Puget Sound Navy Active Kitsap

Cheatham Annex Navy Active York White Bluff AF Active Spokane

Craney Island Navy Active Portsmouth City

DARPA WHS Arlington WEST VIRGINIA 

Def Gen Supply Center Army Active Chesterfield Allegany Ballistics Lab Navy Active Mineral

Elizabeth Rvr Channel Navy Active Portsmouth City Biometric Technology Center Army Active Harrison

Fire Fighters School Navy Active Norfolk City CTC Camp Dawson-Kingwood Army Guard Preston

Fort A P Hill Army Active Caroline Elkins AFRC Army Guard Randolph

Fort Belvoir Army Active Fairfax EWVRA Shepherd Field AF Guard Berkeley

Fort Lee Army Active Prince George Jackson County AFRC Army Guard Jackson

Fort Pickett MTC & FMS 15 Army Guard Nottoway McLaughlin ANGB AF Guard Kanawha

JEB Little Creek-Fort Story Navy Active Virginia Beach City Volkstone Army Guard Preston

JEBLCFS Wallops Island Navy Active Accomack Williamstown Army Guard Wood

Joint Base Langley-Eustis AF Active Newport News City

Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall Army Active Arlington WISCONSIN 

Lafayette Rvr Complex Navy Active Norfolk City Camp Williams Tomah MTA Army Guard Juneau

Marine Corps Base Quantico MC Active Stafford Fort McCoy Army Reserve Monroe

Mark Center WHS Alexandria City Gen Mitchell IAP AF Guard Milwaukee

Naval Air Station Oceana Navy Active Virginia Beach City Hardwood Range AF Guard Juneau

Naval Station Norfolk Navy Active Norfolk City Truax ANGB AF Guard Dane

Naval Support Facility Dahlgren Navy Active King George Volk ANGB AF Guard Juneau

Naval Weapons Station Yorktown Navy Active York W Silver Spring Complex Army Reserve Milwaukee

NAVMEDCEN Portsmouth VA Navy Active Portsmouth City

NAVSUPPACT Hampton Roads VA Navy Active Norfolk City WYOMING 

NAVSUPPACT Norfolk NSY Navy Active Portsmouth City Cheyenne Regional Airport AF Guard Laramie

NNSY South Gate Navy Active Portsmouth City Francis E. Warren Air Force Base AF Active Laramie

NNSY St Helena Navy Active Norfolk City MTCH Camp Guernsey Army Guard Platte

Northwest Chesapeake VA Navy Active Chesapeake City

Pentagon

Pumpkin Neck

WHS

Navy Active

Arlington

King George Source: Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas data Fiscal Year 2020, from 

authoritative sources provided to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Radford Army Ammunition Plant Army Active Montgomery Energy, Installations, and Environment by Component Installation Geospatial Information 

Rivanna Station Army Active Albemarle and Services Programs. 

Sandson AASF Army Guard Henrico

SDA Area Navy Active Norfolk City

St Juliens Creek East Navy Active Chesapeake City

Yorktown Fuel Depot Navy Active York
APPENDIX 2: METHODOLOGY

This section contains additional details on the processes applied to derive the statistics provided in the state profiles 

throughout this report, as well as information on the military installations depicted in the maps in those profiles. 

and services (e.g., information technology and 

research and development), and 

• Sub-awards that prime award recipients

provide to sub-contractors.5

A. Defense Contracts

This section refers to U.S. Department of Defense (DoD)

contract obligations during fiscal year (FY) 2021 (i.e.,

October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021). Gross pay,

which is discussed in section F, is the only other type of

defense spending included in this report. Contract spending figures in this report have not been 

adjusted for inflation; they have been adjusted to reliably 

This report analyzes contract obligation because contracts reflect the location in which the spending occurred. 

are the principal method through which the DoD and 

other federal agencies spend money. The phrase “contract Prime and Sub-Award Reporting 

spending” reflects federal agencies’ use of contracts with Steps were taken to ensure the prime and sub-award 

suppliers to purchase all products and services over a data were accurately reported. In cases where a prime 

legally specified threshold, which increased to $5,000 on contractor gave a subcontract to another vendor, the 

April 13, 2018, and to $10,000 on August 31, 2018 (federal subcontract amount was subtracted from the prime 

agencies can use agency credit cards to buy products and contractor’s total, as well as the totals for the state 

services valued at less than those amounts). While the and county in which the prime contractor was located. 

DoD and other federal agencies obligate funds through Moreover, the amount was added to the subcontractor’s 

other means, those payments comprise a small percentage total and the spending for the state and county in which 

of the DoD’s total expenditures.3 the subcontractor was located. 

Contract obligation amounts are calculated from data Fiscal Years for Contract Spending 

obtained through USAspending.gov, a publicly available This report incorporates two different methods for 

database of unclassified federal spending maintained by assigning prime and sub-awards to a particular fiscal year. 

the U.S. Department of Treasury. All of the nearly 29 million The researchers allocated spending associated with prime 

award transactions downloaded from USAspending.gov awards to the fiscal year in which the prime award was 

for this report listed the DoD as the “funding agency,” and obligated, and allocated all subsequent additions and 

most of those records (99 percent) also listed the DoD as the subtractions of funds to the fiscal year in which those 

“contracting agency.”4 Contract spending amounts reflect funding changes occurred. For example, if a prime award 

obligations rather than actual expenditures. Totals are of $100 was signed on March 1, 2017, then the $100 in 

comprised of: funds was allocated to FY 2017. If the DoD added $50 to 

the contract on October 15, 2017, then such funds were 

• Prime awards that federal agencies provide assigned to FY 2018. If the DoD deducted $25 from the 

to private- and public-sector organizations and same prime award on April 30, 2019, then that deduction 

individuals for products (e.g., clothing and ships) was allocated to FY 2019. 

3

 Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, “Class Deviation - Micro-Purchase Threshold, Simplified Acquisition Threshold, and Special 

Emergency Procurement Authority,” August 31, 2018, https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA002260-18-DPC.pdf.

4 In USAspending.gov prime award records, the contracting agency is listed in the “awarding_agency_name” field and the “funding_agency_name” field lists the funding 

agency. See U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, https://www.usaspending.gov/download_center/custom_award_data.

5

a federal contract or order are required to file a sub-award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime contractor awards any subcontract 

greater than $30,000. (General Services Administration, “About FFATA,” accessed August 3, 2022, https://www.fsrs.gov/#a-faqs).

 In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation clause 52.204-10 (Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards), prime contractors awarded 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 127
128 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

Sub-award amounts were deducted from the fiscal year in or any other product or service identifier. Therefore, subwhich the associated prime award was made and added award spending was categorized by the PSC of the prime 

to the fiscal year during which the sub-award was made. award against which the sub-award was made. 

Continuing with the previous example, if a prime award 

of $100 was signed in FY 2017 and the contractor issued C. Defense Contracts, By Service

a $25 sub-award in FY 2017, then the $25 is deducted This statistic is the percentage of defense contract

from the prime contractor’s total and added to the spending in a state or the District of Columbia that was

subcontractor’s figures for FY 2017. In this case, FY 2017 funded by the Military Services or other DoD activities

is the year during which both the prime and sub-awards in FY 2021. For prime awards, the “Funding Sub Agency

were made. If the contractor issued a subsequent $25 Code” field was used to identify the specific agency that

sub-award in FY 2018, then that $25 was deducted from funded an award. For sub-awards, the Funding Sub Agency

FY 2017 and added to FY 2018. Code listed for the associated prime award identified the

funding agency for the sub-award. All awards identifying

the U.S. Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force

Defense Spending by State reports for Fiscal Year were categorized as “Army,” “Navy/Marines,” and “Air

2018 and beyond contain one significant change Force.” All other DoD activities, such as the Defense Health

from prior reports. From FY 2013 until FY 2017, Agency and Defense Logistics Agency, are categorized as

the Defense Spending by State report reflected the “Other Defense.”

length of each prime contract in USAspending.gov. 

Such adjustments were not made for the figures D. Top Defense Contractors

in the FY 2018 and successive reports due to data This list includes the private- and public-sector vendors

quality concerns (e.g., some contracts appear to that were among the ten biggest recipients of DoD

have activity long after the end of the period of spending in a state or the District of Columbia during

performance). The analysis continues, however, to FY 2021. The researchers used DUNS numbers to

adjust the prime obligations to reflect the year and identify both the prime and sub-award contractors.6 If a

place of performance of sub-awards. parent company was listed in the contract records, the

researchers applied the parent company’s DUNS number.

If no parent company DUNS number was recorded, the

B. Defense Contracts, By Type researchers used the numbers for the individual vendors

This represents the proportion of total prime award or sub-awardees.

spending in a state or the District of Columbia that went to

four product and service categories: construction; research E. Contract Awards Performed, By Fiscal Year

and development; services; and supplies and equipment. These numbers represent total defense contract awards in

The DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy was used a state or the District of Columbia for each fiscal year since

to categorize the spending on the products and services 2014. Calculated according to the methodology described

identified by the product and service code (PSC) listed in in Section A, these figures include both prime and subeach prime award record. The federal government uses awards, and are often different from those listed in

these codes to identify the products or services that previous versions of this report. These differences reflect

comprise the majority of spending in a prime award contract modifications (e.g., the addition/reduction of

contract. Sub-award records do not contain such a code funds or an extension of the period of performance)

6

 “DUNS” stands for Data Universal Numbering System, which is proprietary to Dun & Bradstreet, a commercial data company. Dun & Bradstreet uses the system to 

establish business credit files and the numbers correspond to each physical location of a business. Until April 2022, the federal government required all businesses to 

have a DUNS number in order to receive a federal contract or grant (Dun & Bradstreet, “Dun & Bradstreet D-U-N-S® Number,” accessed August 3, 2022, https://www.dnb.

com/duns-number.html; SAM.gov, “DUNS to Unique Entity ID (SAM) Transition,” accessed August 3, 2022, https://sam.gov/content/duns-uei).
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 129

that occurred after the data were obtained for the prior sites, and the boundaries comprise federally owned or 

reports, as well as differences in the methods used to managed land. The point centers were used to infer the 

assign prime and sub-awards to specific fiscal years. relevant county name via the Federal Communications 

Commission’s geolocation service, https://geo.fcc.gov/

F. Defense Personnel api/census. The dataset is in a shapefile format, which 

This section refers to the total active duty, civilian, National is common for geographic information systems, and 

Guard, and Reserve personnel in a state or the District of conforms to the World Geodetic System 1984, a frequently 

Columbia in FY 2021. Defense payroll figures are the total used terrestrial reference system referred to as “WGS84.” 

gross pay received by those personnel through FY 2021, The data are in decimal degrees. Many facilities in the 

while personnel counts reflect the levels on September 30, “MIRTA” dataset include subordinate sites. For various 

2021. These data are from the DoD’s Defense Manpower reasons, not all military installations are included.7

Data Center (DMDC). Readers are cautioned not to

compare personnel counts from the Defense Spending by

State FY 2016 report to the FY 2021 report. As was the case

in the FY 2017 through FY 2020 reports, this report reflects

DMDC data for all personnel corresponding to a single

snapshot in time (September 30, 2021) rather than over

the course of the fiscal year.

Readers may notice that states with a large Navy/Marine 

presence (e.g., California, Washington, Virginia, and 

South Carolina) appear to have significantly increased 

in personnel and payroll from the FY 2017 version 

of this report. This is due to a change in how DMDC 

counts people. Personnel who previously appeared to 

be assigned to Armed Forces Americas or Armed Forces 

Europe have been reported in FY 2018 through FY 2021 

in their home-port state, but with an APO/FPO zip code 

of their current overseas location. Since APO/FPO zip 

codes do not have counties, their county is unknown, but 

they are included in state totals. 

G. Military Installations

The installations depicted in the maps throughout this

report are drawn from the DoD’s “Military Installations,

Ranges, and Training Areas” (MIRTA) dataset. The “MIRTA”

dataset contains geospatial data (i.e., latitude and

longitude) on the point locations and boundaries of DoD 

facilities listed in the DoD’s 2020 Base Structure Report.

The points represent the centers or near-centers of DoD

7 U.S. Department of Defense, "Rel

osd.mil/eie/bsi/bei_disdi.html.

ease Notes: Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas (Point Locations and Boundaries)", September 17, 2021, https://www.acq.

U.S. Department of Defense 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation 

2231 Crystal Drive, Suite 520, Arlington, VA 22202 

703-697-2130 | www.oldcc.gov