DEFENSE 

SPENDING 

BY STATE 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

U.S. Department of Defense 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation 

 

 

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation

(OLDCC) (formerly the Office of Economic Adjustment) partnered with the Library of Congress’s

Federal Research Division (FRD) to produce this report.П FRD’s analytical team includes Vega

Bharadwaj, Katarina David, Malinda Goodrich, Hannah Ho, Sarah McNeal, Wm. Noël Noël, Annie

Rorem, Alan Stone, and Liz White. Liz Chimienti managed this project for OLDCC and provided 

input throughout the report’s development.

This research benefited from the guidance of staff at the DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center, 

the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and the Congressional Research Service. Experts atthe 

American Enterprise Institute, Brookings Institution, Center for a New American Security, and 

Center for Strategic and International Studies generously offered feedback on earlier versions 

of this report. 

Please direct any questions or suggestions for future reports via email to: 

Tara Butler 

Program Director, Intergovernmental Affairs 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, U.S. Department of Defense 

tara.a.butlerϦ.civ@mail.mil

An electronic copy of this report is located online at https://oea.gov/defense-spending-statefiscal-year-2019.

ϣ

 The name of the Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA) recently changed to Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation per Section ϫϢϧ of the William M. (Mac) 

Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year ϤϢϤϣ. This report is a continuation of the annual series issued by OEA since Fiscal Year ϤϢϣϥ.

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 1
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Acknowledgments............................................. 1

Introduction .................................................. 3

State and District of Columbia Summary Table.................... 7

How to Read This Report...................................... 10

United States Overview ....................................... 14

State and District of Columbia Profiles.......................... 18

Appendix 1: Military Installations.............................. 120

Appendix 2: Methodology .................................... 127

2 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of a state by state 

analysis of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) contract 

and personnel spending during fiscal year (FY) 2019. 

The report’s graphs, maps, and tables present a range 

of findings, such as total spending figures, categories of 

contracted goods and services, major defense vendors, 

and numbers and types of defense personnel. State and 

local officials may use this information to assess a region’s 

dependence on defense spending and to target assistance 

to support more resilient communities and companies.

Conducted between March 2020 and December 2020-- 

longer than originally anticipated due to the COVID-19 

pandemic, the analysis primarily entailed an examination 

of DoD-funded prime- and sub-award contract data and 

defense personnel and payroll figures. Findings are drawn 

from an array of sources, including the DoD’s Defense 

Manpower Data Center and USAspending.gov, which is 

managed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. 

FY ϤϢϣϫ Overview

In FY 2019, the DoD’s budget authority rose for a fourth 

straight year, from $694.5 billion to $712.5 billion.Р DoD 

contract obligations and payroll spending in all 50 states 

and the District of Columbia totaled $550.9 billion, 

approximately $1,678 per U.S. resident and 2.5 percent of 

the country’s gross domestic product (GDP). Contracts for 

various products and services totaled $403.9 billion, thus 

comprising the majority of the spending, while DoD 

personnel payroll accounted for $146.9 billion (see table 

1).

Most contract funds went to supplies and equipment 

(such as aircraft, ships, weapons, and parts; 53.39 percent) 

and services (34.57 percent), with research and 

development (8.47 percent) and construction (3.57 

percent) comprising the remainder. The largest portion of 

personnel pay was for active duty military (46 percent), 

followed by civilians (40 percent), the National Guard (8 

percent), and the Reserves (6 percent). 

Table 1: Top 10 States by Total Defense Spending

 RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions)

1 California $66.2 

2 Virginia $60.3 

3 Texas $54.8 

4 Florida $29.8 

5 Maryland $26.1 

6 Connecticut $19.7 

7 Pennsylvania $18.1 

8 Washington $17.8

 9 Alabama $16.0 

10 Massachusetts $15.8 

Total for Top Ten States $324.7 

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $550.9

Examined at the state level, defense spending ranged from 

$488.6 million in Vermont to $66.2 billion in California, 

with a median value of $6.3 billion per state among the 50 

states and the District of Columbia. Approximately

Table 2: Top 10 States by Defense Spending as Percentage of State GDP

RANK STATE PERCENTAGE

 1 Virginia 10.6 

2 Hawaii 7.7 

3 Alabama 6.9 

4 Connecticut 6.8 

5 Alaska 6.4 

6 Maryland 6.0 

7 Maine 5.8 

8 Kentucky 5.7 

9 New Mexico 5.7 

10 Mississippi 5.3 

Ϥ

 All numbers presented in current U.S. dollars. Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller), National Defense Budget Estimates for FY ϤϢϤϣ (Washington, DC: April 

ϤϢϤϢ): page ϣϧϢ-ϣϧϣ, https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/Ϧϧ/Documents/defbudget/fyϤϢϤϣ/FYϤϣ_Green_Book.pdf.A

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 3
59 percent of the DoD’s $550.9 billion went to the top 10 

states (see table 1). Although there was some overlap, six 

of the ten states with the highest share of defense 

spending as a proportion of their state’s GDP were not 

among the top recipients of total defense spending, 

including Hawaii (7.7 percent of state GDP), Alaska (6.4 

percent), Maine (5.8 percent), Kentucky (5.7 percent), 

New Mexico (5.7 percent), and Mississippi (5.3 percent; 

see table 2).

Further review shows that some states received 

substantial funds for both contract and personnel 

spending, while other states received relatively high 

amounts in only one. Specifically, California, Florida, 

Maryland, Texas, and Virginia were all among the top ten 

recipients of defense contract and personnel spending. 

Arizona and Missouri, major recipients of defense contract 

funds, were not among the top ten states for overall 

defense spending (see table 3). 

Table 3: Top 10 States by Defense Contract Spending

 RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions)

1 California $50.2

 2 Texas $43.4

 3 Virginia $41.6 

4 Florida $22.3 

5 Connecticut $19.0

 6 Maryland $18.4

 7 Pennsylvania $15.3 

8 Massachusetts $14.7 

9 Missouri $13.4 

10 Arizona $12.9 

Total for Top Ten States $251.3

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $403.9

Similarly, Colorado, Georgia, Hawaii, and North Carolina 

were among the largest recipients of defense personnel 

spending, but were not among the top states for overall 

defense spending (see table 4). 

Table 4: Top 10 States by Defense Personnel Spending

RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions)

1 Virginia $18.7 

2 California $16.0 

3 Texas $11.4 

4 Maryland $7.6 

5 Florida $7.5

 6 North Carolina $7.1 

7 Georgia $6.8 

8 Washington $6.7

 9 Hawaii $5.0 

10 Colorado $3.6 

Total for Top Ten States $90.4

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $146.9

Methodology Change

The FY 2018 and FY 2019 reports contain one significant 

change from prior reports. From FY 2013 until FY 2017, the 

Defense Spending by State report reflected the length of 

each prime contract in USAspending.gov. Such adjustments 

were not made for the figures in the current report due to 

data quality concerns (e.g., some contracts appear to have 

activity long after the end of the period of performance). 

The analysis continues, however, to adjust the prime 

obligations to reflect the year and place of performance of 

sub-awards. 

An Excel-formatted workbook featuring metrics from the 

FY 2019 report is located at https://oea.gov/dsbs-fy2019. 

Appendix 2 contains additional details on this report’s 

research methodology.

4 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
Data Sources and Publications Used in This Analysis

DATA SOURCE PERTINENT INFORMATION 

USASpending.gov U.S. Department of the Treasury Prime- and sub-award spending on 

defense-related goods and services 

Defense Manpower Data Center U.S. Department of Defense Personnel counts as of September 30, 

2019 and gross payroll figures 

Gross Domestic Product by State, 

Fourth Quarter and Annual 2019 

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau 

of Economic Analysis State gross domestic product totals 

“2019 National and State Population 

Estimates” 

U.S. Department of Commerce, Census 

Bureau State and national population figures 

Defense Procurement and Acquisition 

Policy U.S. Department of Defense Spending categories 

“HUD USPS ZIP Code Crosswalk Files: 

ZIP-County Crosswalk” 

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban 

Development Counties corresponding to ZIP codes 

“Military Installations, Ranges and 

Training Areas” U.S. Department of Defense Military installations by state and county 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 5
This page intentionally left blank
SUMMARY TABLE 

The following table shows U.S. Department of Defense 

(DoD) contract and personnel spending data for all 50 

states and the District of Columbia (listed alphabetically) 

in fiscal year (FY) 2019, which can be used to provide 

information and statistics about various topics, such as: 

• The importance of defense spending for a state’s

economy (Columns 1 and 3).

• How that spending compares to other states and the

country overall (Columns 2, 10, and 11).

• The association between defense spending and a state’s

economic reliance on defense-related employment and

industries (Columns 4-9).

The columns show the following variables: 

1. Defense Spending as a Share of GDP identifies the total

amount of defense spending (i.e., contracts and payroll)

per state as a share of that state’s GDP. This provides an

indication of the degree to which a state’s economic

health depends on such funding and how vulnerable

a state is to DoD spending changes.

2. State Share of Total U.S. Defense Spending calculates

each state’s share of total defense spending (i.e.,

contract obligations and payroll in the 50 states plus the

District of Columbia), which helps to identify the largest

and smallest recipients of DoD funding.

3. Defense Spending per Resident is the amount DoD

spent per resident in a state or the District of Columbia

on defense contracts and payroll. Like “Defense

Spending as a Share of GDP,” it shows a state’s relative

dependence on and vulnerability to changes in this

type of support.

4. Total Contract and Payroll Spending is the sum of all

DoD payroll and contract obligations in a state or the

District of Columbia.

5. Total Contract Spending shows the amount DoD

obligated to contracts in a given state or the District

of Columbia.

6. Total Payroll is the gross pay received by active duty,

civilian, National Guard, and Reserve personnel with

an assigned or duty location in a state or the District

of Columbia during FY 2019. These figures, as well as

those in columns 7-9, do not include benefits for

current or former defense personnel.

7. Civilian Pay shows the total gross pay to DoD civilian

personnel in FY 2019.

8. Military Active Duty Pay equals the total gross pay to

active duty personnel in FY 2019.

9. National Guard & Reserve Pay refers to the total gross

pay received by National Guard and Reserve personnel

in FY 2019.

10. Ranking by Defense Spending as a Share of State GDP

indicates a state’s placement among the 50 states and

the District of Columbia with respect to the total

amount of defense spending (i.e., contracts and payroll)

as a share of that state’s GDP.

11. Ranking by Total Defense Spending likewise indicates

a state’s placement among the 50 states and the District

of Columbia. Detailed information on the methodology

for these statistics is included in appendix 2.

The FY 2018 and FY 2019 reports contain one 

significant change from prior reports. From FY 

2013 until FY 2017, the Defense Spending by State

report reflected the length of each prime contract 

in USAspending.gov. Such adjustments were not 

made for the figures in the current report due to 

data quality concerns (e.g., some contracts appear 

to have activity long after the end of the period of 

performance). The analysis continues, however, to 

adjust the prime obligations to reflect the year and 

place of performance of sub-awards.

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 7
DEFENSE SPENDING 

AS A SHARE OF GDP 

(%)

STATE SHARE OF 

TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

(%)

DEFENSE SPENDING 

PER RESIDENT 

($) 

TOTAL CONTRACT AND 

PAYROLL SPENDING 

($ billions) 

TOTAL CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

($ billions) 

TOTAL PAYROLL 

($ billions) 

Alabama 6.9 2.9 3,263 16.0 12.7 3.3 

Alaska 6.4 0.6 4,804 3.5 1.8 1.7 

Arizona 4.0 2.7 2,076 15.1 12.9 2.2 

Arkansas 1.2 0.3 545 1.6 1.0 0.7 

California 2.1 12.0 1,676 66.2 50.2 16.0 

Colorado 2.6 1.9 1,835 10.6 7.0 3.6 

Connecticut 6.8 3.6 5,521 19.7 19.0 0.7 

Delaware 0.8 0.1 651 0.6 0.2 0.4 

District of Columbia 4.6 1.2 9,413 6.6 4.3 2.4 

Florida 2.6 5.4 1,389 29.8 22.3 7.5 

Georgia 2.2 2.5 1,320 14.0 7.2 6.8 

Hawaii 7.7 1.4 5,280 7.5 2.5 5.0 

Idaho 0.8 0.1 394 0.7 0.3 0.4 

Illinois 1.0 1.6 695 8.8 6.6 2.2 

Indiana 1.4 1.0 800 5.4 4.0 1.4 

Iowa 1.3 0.5 788 2.5 2.1 0.4 

Kansas 1.9 0.6 1,162 3.4 1.3 2.0 

Kentucky 5.7 2.3 2,810 12.6 9.7 2.9 

Louisiana 1.2 0.6 678 3.2 1.5 1.7 

Maine 5.8 0.7 2,961 4.0 3.2 0.7 

Maryland 6.0 4.7 4,311 26.1 18.4 7.6 

Massachusetts 2.6 2.9 2,298 15.8 14.7 1.1 

Michigan 1.2 1.2 653 6.5 5.2 1.3 

Minnesota 0.7 0.5 473 2.7 2.0 0.6 

Mississippi 5.3 1.1 2,108 6.3 4.5 1.8 

Missouri 4.5 2.7 2,440 15.0 13.4 1.6 

Montana 1.2 0.1 617 0.7 0.3 0.4 

Nebraska 1.2 0.3 832 1.6 0.7 0.9 

Nevada 1.7 0.5 974 3.0 1.9 1.1 

New Hampshire 3.5 0.6 2,268 3.1 2.8 0.3 

New Jersey 1.4 1.6 1,012 9.0 7.1 1.9 

New Mexico 5.7 1.1 2,912 6.1 4.7 1.4 

New York 0.6 2.1 597 11.6 8.9 2.7 

North Carolina 2.0 2.2 1,171 12.3 5.2 7.1 

North Dakota 1.4 0.1 1,070 0.8 0.2 0.6 

Ohio 1.4 1.8 858 10.0 6.7 3.3 

Oklahoma 3.3 1.2 1,698 6.7 3.6 3.1 

Oregon 0.7 0.3 401 1.7 1.2 0.5 

Pennsylvania 2.2 3.3 1,415 18.1 15.3 2.8 

Rhode Island 2.4 0.3 1,394 1.5 0.7 0.8 

South Carolina 2.3 1.1 1,147 5.9 3.2 2.7 

South Dakota 1.1 0.1 695 0.6 0.2 0.4 

Tennessee 1.3 0.9 745 5.1 4.0 1.1 

Texas 2.9 9.9 1,889 54.8 43.4 11.4 

Utah 2.9 1.0 1,776 5.7 3.9 1.8 

Vermont 1.4 0.1 783 0.5 0.3 0.1 

Virginia 10.6 10.9 7,066 60.3 41.6 18.7 

Washington 2.9 3.2 2,343 17.8 11.2 6.7 

West Virginia 2.1 0.3 907 1.6 1.3 0.4 

Wisconsin 2.2 1.4 1,317 7.7 7.1 0.6 

Wyoming 1.4 0.1 997 0.6 0.2 0.3 

U.S. Average/Total 2.5 100.0 1,678 550.9* 403.9 146.9

1 2 3 4 5 6

* These figures do not total $550.9 billion due to rounding.

8 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
 

 

 

 

CIVILIAN PAY 

($ billions) 

MILITARY ACTIVE 

DUTY PAY 

($ billions) 

NATIONAL GUARD & 

RESERVE PAY 

($ billions) 

RANKING BY DEFENSE 

SPENDING AS A SHARE 

OF STATE GDP 

RANKING BY TOTAL 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

Alabama 2.2 0.7 0.4 3 9 

Alaska 0.4 1.1 0.2 5 33 

Arizona 0.7 1.1 0.4 13 11 

Arkansas 0.2 0.2 0.2 40 41 

California 5.5 9.0 1.5 28 1 

Colorado 0.9 2.3 0.4 20 17 

Connecticut 0.2 0.3 0.2 4 6 

Delaware 0.1 0.2 0.1 48 48 

District of Columbia 1.4 0.8 0.2 11 24 

Florida 2.5 4.0 1.0 19 4 

Georgia 2.5 3.5 0.8 25 13 

Hawaii 1.7 2.9 0.4 2 22 

Idaho 0.1 0.2 0.1 47 46 

Illinois 0.9 0.8 0.5 46 20 

Indiana 0.9 0.1 0.4 36 30 

Iowa 0.1 0.0 0.2 39 39 

Kansas 0.5 1.3 0.3 30 34 

Kentucky 0.7 1.9 0.3 8 14 

Louisiana 0.4 0.8 0.4 42 35 

Maine 0.6 0.0 0.1 7 32 

Maryland 4.7 2.3 0.6 6 5 

Massachusetts 0.6 0.2 0.4 21 10 

Michigan 0.9 0.1 0.3 44 25 

Minnesota 0.2 0.0 0.4 49 38 

Mississippi 0.6 0.6 0.5 10 26 

Missouri 0.5 0.7 0.4 12 12 

Montana 0.1 0.2 0.1 41 47 

Nebraska 0.3 0.4 0.2 43 43 

Nevada 0.2 0.8 0.2 31 37 

New Hampshire 0.1 0.1 0.1 14 36 

New Jersey 1.0 0.4 0.5 37 19 

New Mexico 0.5 0.8 0.1 9 27 

New York 0.8 1.1 0.7 51 16 

North Carolina 1.6 5.0 0.6 29 15 

North Dakota 0.1 0.4 0.1 34 45 

Ohio 2.2 0.5 0.6 32 18 

Oklahoma 1.7 1.1 0.3 15 23 

Oregon 0.2 0.0 0.2 50 40 

Pennsylvania 1.9 0.2 0.6 24 7 

Rhode Island 0.5 0.2 0.1 22 44 

South Carolina 0.8 1.5 0.4 23 28 

South Dakota 0.1 0.2 0.1 45 49 

Tennessee 0.4 0.2 0.5 38 31 

Texas 3.5 6.5 1.4 16 3 

Utah 1.2 0.3 0.4 17 29 

Vermont 0.0 0.0 0.1 33 51 

Virginia 9.2 8.6 0.8 1 2 

Washington 2.5 3.7 0.5 18 8 

West Virginia 0.1 0.0 0.2 27 42 

Wisconsin 0.2 0.1 0.3 26 21 

Wyoming 0.1 0.2 0.1 35 50 

U.S. Average/Total 59.2 67.7 20.1 N/A N/A

7 8 9 10 11

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 9
Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 16%

Service: 43%

Supplies and

Equipment: 40%

Active Duty: 16%

Civilian: 48%

National 

Guard: 23%

Reserve: 13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

49%

16%

9%

26%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

72%

2%

19%

7%

$6.8 $7.9 $8.3 $8.4 $8.4 $8.2

$11.7 $12.7

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

By Type 

By Service 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Austal $1.4 B

Boeing $1.3 B

Northrop Grumman $970.6 M

M1 Support Services $596.9 M

SAIC $578.0 M

Torch Technologies $457.1 M

Lockheed Martin $369.4 M

Science and Engineering Services $340.8 M

KBR $252.7 M

Parsons Corp. $231.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

ALABAMA 

#9 #3 2.9% $3,263 #11 #18 #11

$16.0 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

6.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

PER RESIDENT $12.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

52,197 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

$3.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service 

$3.3 BILLION 

TOTAL PAYROLL 

52,197

TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Madison 727 13,767 461 776 15,731

Montgomery 3,161 3,185 2,686 2,220 11,252

Dale 3,837 2,180 52 146 6,215

Calhoun 45 3,734 943 385 5,107

Jefferson 300 447 1,740 1,879 4,366

Mobile 46 792 789 655 2,282

Tuscaloosa 14 82 169 263 528

Houston 52 37 285 96 470

Lee 48 18 141 243 450

Coffee 0 171 278 0 449

FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

A 

D 

E 

B 

C 

F 

I 

G 

H 

J 

K L M N O P Q 

10 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT 

The following information briefly describes the statistics listed in the state profiles throughout this report. A listing of 

military installations by state and county can be found in appendix 1. More detailed information on the methodology is 

included in appendix 2. 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

A 

B 

C 

D 

E 

Defense Contracts refers to U.S. Department of 

Defense (DoD) obligations through DoD-funded 

contracts during fiscal year (FY) 2019 (i.e., October 1, 

2018 through September 30, 2019). All contract data 

are from USAspending.gov and include prime awards 

the DoD made to private- and public-sector 

contractors, as well as sub-awards that prime-award 

recipients provided to subcontractors. 

Defense Contracts, By Type represents the 

proportions of total prime and sub-award obligations 

in a state that went to four product and service 

categories: construction; research and development; 

service; and supplies and equipment. The DoD’s 

Procurement and Acquisition Policy was used to 

categorize spending on the products and services 

identified by the product service code listed in each 

prime award record. 

Defense Contracts, By Service is the percentage of 

defense contract spending that was funded by the 

Military Services or Other Defense activities. This 

category includes the Office of the Secretary of 

Defense, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Inspector General 

(DoD), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 

Defense Agencies, and the Defense Field Activities. 

These figures include prime awards and sub-awards 

since both records have fields that identify the federal 

agency that funded the award. 

Top Defense Contractors lists the private- and publicsector vendors that were among the ten largest 

recipients of DoD obligations in a state or the District 

of Columbia. These figures are adjusted to reflect the 

place of performance for prime and sub-awards (see 

appendix 2 for details).

Contract Awards Performed by Fiscal Year represents 

the total value of defense contract awards in a state 

or the District of Columbia for each fiscal year from FY 

2012 through FY 2019. These figures are adjusted to 

F 

G 

H 

I 

J 

reflect the place of performance for prime and 

sub-awards (see appendix 2 for details).

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Defense Personnel includes the total numbers of 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel in a state or the District of Columbia on 

September 30, 2019. Defense payroll figures are the 

total gross pay received by those personnel in FY 2019. 

The states and counties refer to the duty locations for 

active duty and civilian personnel. National Guard and 

Reserve personnel figures are based on assigned 

locations. These data are from the DoD’s Defense 

Manpower Data Center (DMDC). 

Allocations, By Type indicates the proportion of total 

defense personnel with an assigned or duty location 

in a state or the District of Columbia who were active 

duty, civilian, National Guard, or Reserve personnel on 

September 30, 2019.

Allocations, By Service represents a snapshot of the 

proportion of total defense personnel across the 

Military Services and other DoD activities with an 

assigned or duty location in a state or the District of 

Columbia on September 30, 2019.

Total Payroll and Personnel is the total gross pay 

during FY 2019 and count of all active duty, civilian, 

National Guard, and Reserve personnel with an 

assigned or duty location in a state or the District of 

Columbia on September 30, 2019. Pension payments 

and other benefits are not included in the payroll 

figure. 

Top Defense Personnel Locations lists the ten counties 

with the highest numbers of defense personnel 

reported on September 30, 2019. Personnel numbers 

are not disclosed—indicated by “ND”—for counties in 

which the numbers of active duty, civilian, or National 

Guard and Reserve personnel are less than ten to 

protect those individuals’ personally identifiable 

information. 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 11
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT 

Tuscaloosa

Lee

Montgomery

Coffee

Dale

Houston

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Limestone Madison

Marshall

Calhoun

Jefferson

Talladega

Dallas

Montgomery

Dale

Mobile

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALABAMA 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Madison

Mobile

Dale

Montgomery

Calhoun

Limestone

Talladega

Jefferson

Marshall

Dallas

(M = millions, B = billions)

$9.2 B

$1.5 B

$857.2 M

$269.7 M

$269.0 M

$94.2 M

$87.3 M

$71.3 M

$48.4 M

$41.0 M

Madison

Montgomery

Dale

Calhoun

Jefferson

Mobile

Coffee

Tuscaloosa

Houston

Lee

$1.6 B

$629.7 M

$430.0 M

$264.2 M

$156.1 M

$93.2 M

$14.9 M

$14.1 M

$13.6 M

$12.8 M

Madison

Calhoun

Jefferson

Mobile

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

R 

S 

12 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
HOW TO READ THIS REPORT 

SUMMARY BAR 

K 

L 

M 

N 

O 

$ Spent in State is the combined total of defense 

contract obligations and defense personnel spending 

in a state or the District of Columbia during FY 2019. 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia. 

% of State GDP represents the combined total of 

defense contract obligations and personnel spending 

as a proportion of a state or the District of Columbia’s 

GDP in FY 2019. The state’s GDP is the total value of all 

goods and services produced in a given fiscal year; 

these data are from the U.S. Department of 

Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis. The 

ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia. 

% of Total U.S. Defense Spending is the combined 

total of defense contract obligations and personnel 

spending in a state or the District of Columbia as a 

proportion of the DoD’s contract and personnel 

spending in all 50 states and the District of Columbia 

in FY 2019.

$ per Resident highlights the combined total defense 

contract obligations and personnel spending in a 

state or the District of Columbia divided by the area’s 

overall population. These population figures are July 1, 

2019 estimates provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Contract Spending is the total amount of contracts 

the DoD obligates for products and services in a state 

or the District of Columbia during FY 2019. The 

ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia. 

P Number of Personnel indicates the total number of 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel with an assigned or duty location in a state 

or the District of Columbia on September 30, 2019. 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia. 

Q 

R 

S 

Personnel Spending totals the gross pay received by 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel with an assigned or duty location in a state 

or the District of Columbia during FY 2019. This figure 

does not include pension payments or other benefits. 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia. 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Top Defense Contract Spending Locations lists and 

shows the ten counties (or independent cities) in a 

state with the highest defense contract obligations in 

FY 2019. For states with fewer than ten counties, all 

counties are identified. The District of Columbia is the 

only jurisdiction represented by a single location. 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Top Defense Personnel Spending Locations lists and 

shows the ten counties (or independent cities) within 

a state with the highest gross pay received by active 

duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve personnel 

during FY 2019. For states with fewer than ten 

counties, all counties are identified. The District of 

Columbia is the only jurisdiction represented by a 

single location. 

Caveat for the Personnel Counts in this Report: 

Readers are cautioned not to compare changes in 

personnel by county from the Defense Spending by 

State FY 2016 report to the FY 2019 report as the 

differences are likely due to changes in this report’s 

source of personnel data. This report reflects DMDC 

data for all personnel corresponding to a single 

snapshot in time (September 30, 2019) rather than 

over the course of the fiscal year. 

The FY 2018 and FY 2019 reports contain one significant change 

from prior reports. From FY 2013 until FY 2017, the

Defense Spending by State report reflected the length of

each prime contract in USAspending.gov. Such adjustments 

were not made for the figures in the current report due to data 

quality concerns (e.g., some contracts appear to have activity 

long after the end of the period of performance). The analysis 

continues, however, to adjust the prime obligations to reflect

the year and place of performance of sub-awards.

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 13
 

 

UNITED STATES 

FISCAL YEAR 2019

Billions

$14.0 to $66.2

$6.3 to $12.6

$2.5 to $6.1

$0.5 to $1.7

Total Spending

 DC

Total Spending as % of State GDP

Percentage

4.0 to 10.6

2.2 to 3.5

1.3 to 2.1

0.6 to 1.2

DC

Contract Spending

Billions

$9.7 to $50.2 

$4.0 to $8.9

$1.3 to $4.0

$0.2 to $1.2

DC 

 Top 10 States by Total Spending 

(billions)

California $66.2

Virginia $60.3

Texas $54.8

Florida $29.8

Maryland $26.1

Connecticut $19.7

Pennsylvania $18.1

Washington $17.8

Alabama $16.0

Massachusetts $15.8

 Top 10 States by Total Spending

 as % of GDP

Virginia 10.6

Hawaii 7.7

Alabama 6.9

Connecticut 6.8

Alaska 6.4

Maryland 6.0

Maine 5.8

Kentucky 5.7

New Mexico 5.7

Mississippi 5.3

Top 10 States by Contract Spending

(billions)

California $50.2

Texas $43.4

Virginia $41.6

Florida $22.3

Connecticut $19.0

Maryland $18.4

Pennsylvania $15.3

Massachusetts $14.7

Missouri $13.4

Arizona $12.9

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

14 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
 

UNITED STATES FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019

Personnel Spending

Billions

$3.1 to $18.7 

$1.7 to $2.9

$0.6 to $1.6

$0.1 to $0.5

DC

Personnel Numbers

Thousands

61 to 279

32 to 60

14 to 27

4 to 13

DC 

Top 10 States by Personnel Spending

(billions)

Virginia $18.7

California $16.0

Texas $11.4

Maryland $7.6

Florida $7.5

North Carolina $7.1

Georgia $6.8

Washington $6.7

Hawaii $5.0

Colorado $3.6

 Top 10 States by Personnel Numbers

(thousands)

California 279

Virginia 249

Texas 225

North Carolina 144

Georgia 133

Florida 130

Washington 109

Maryland 95

Hawaii 70

South Carolina 68

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 15
UNITED STATES 

$550.9 B 2.5% $1,678 $403.9 B 2.7 M $146.9 B

TOTAL SPENT OF GDP PER RESIDENT CONTRACT SPENDING NUMBER OF PERSONNEL PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Service: 35%

Construction: 4% Research and

Development: 8%

Equipment: 53%

By Service 

Army 

23% 

Navy/Marines 

35% 

Air Force 

21% 

Other Defense 

21% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 13% 

Active Duty: 43% National 

Guard: 16% 

Civilian: 28% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

44% 

Navy/Marines 

29% 

Air Force 

23% 

Other Defense 

4% 

Top Defense Contractors (B = billions)

Lockheed Martin $45.6 B

Boeing $25.7 B

Northrop Grumman $19.5 B

General Dynamics $18.6 B

Raytheon $15.7 B

United Technologies $10.3 B

BAE Systems $7.3 B

Huntington Ingalls $6.7 B

Humana $6.7 B

L3 Technologies $4.9 B

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$403.9

$339.6 $298.9

FY12

$274.1 $294.6 $265.1 $255.5 $245.9

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

$146.9 BILLION 2,669,922

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

San Diego, CA 78,722 24,332 890 9,098 113,042

Bexar, TX 36,612 22,606 3,085 9,189 71,492

Honolulu, HI 34,319 19,704 4,663 4,037 62,723

Cumberland, NC 46,469 10,628 607 2,237 59,941

El Paso, CO 32,545 8,794 992 4,476 46,807

Pierce, WA 29,411 7,632 2,879 5,417 45,339

Onslow, NC 40,394 3,801 57 487 44,739

Bell, TX 33,816 5,348 720 867 40,751

Norfolk City, VA 16,798 16,616 292 1,270 34,976

El Paso, TX 26,172 4,022 1,180 1,901 33,275

16 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

UNITED STATES FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

King

Hartford

Fairfax

St. Louis

Jefferson

Madison

San Diego

Los Angeles

Tarrant

Dallas

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (B = billions)

Tarrant, TX

Fairfax, VA

San Diego, CA

Los Angeles, CA

St. Louis, MO

Dallas, TX

Madison, AL

Hartford, CT

King, WA

Jefferson, KY

(K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

$17.6 B

$17.4 B

$14.0 B

$13.1 B

$10.5 B

$9.3 B

$9.2 B

$8.5 B

$8.3 B

$7.5 B

Pierce

El Paso

District of Columbia

Norfolk

Cumberland

Bell

San Diego, CA

Honolulu, HI

Bexar, TX

Cumberland, NC

El Paso, CO

Norfolk, VA

$6.6 B

$4.5 B

$4.1 B

$3.9 B

$2.9 B

$2.7 B 

Pierce, WA

$2.7 B 

District of Columbia

$2.4 B 

Bell, TX

$2.2 B 

Fairfax, VA

$2.2 B 

San Diego 

Honolulu

Bexar

Fairfax 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 17
ALABAMA 

#9

$16.0 B SPENT IN 

#3 

6.9% OF STATE GDP

2.9%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$3,263

PER RESIDENT 

#11

$12.7 B CONTRACT 

#18

52,197 NUMBER OF 

#11

$3.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 16%

Supplies and

Equipment: 40%

Service: 43%

By Service 

Army 

49% 

Navy/Marines 

16% 

Air Force 

9% 

Other Defense 

26% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 13% Active Duty: 16% 

National 

Guard: 23% 

Civilian: 48% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

72% 

Navy/Marines 

2% 

Air Force 

19% 

Other Defense 

7% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Austal $1.4 B

Boeing $1.3 B

Northrop Grumman $970.6 M

M1 Support Services $596.9 M

SAIC $578.0 M

Torch Technologies $457.1 M

Lockheed Martin $369.4 M

Science and Engineering Services $340.8 M

KBR $252.7 M

Parsons Corp. $231.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$12.7 $11.7

$7.9 $8.3 $8.4 $8.4 $8.2

$6.8

FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$3.3 BILLION 52,197

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Madison 727 13,767 461

Montgomery 3,161 3,185 2,686

Dale 3,837 2,180 52

Calhoun 45 3,734 943

Jefferson 300 447 1,740

Mobile 46 792 789

Tuscaloosa 14 82 169

Houston 52 37 285

Lee 48 18 141

Coffee 0 171 278

Reserve

776

2,220

146

385

1,879

655

263

96

243

0

Total

15,731

11,252

6,215

5,107

4,366

2,282

528

470

450

449

18 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALABAMA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Limestone Madison

Marshall

Calhoun

Jefferson

Talladega

Dallas

Montgomery

Dale

Mobile

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Madison

Mobile

Dale

Montgomery

Calhoun

Limestone

Talladega

Jefferson

Marshall

Dallas

(M = millions, B = billions)

$9.2 B

$1.5 B

$857.2 M

$269.7 M

$269.0 M

$94.2 M

$87.3 M

$71.3 M

$48.4 M

$41.0 M

Madison

Montgomery

Dale

Calhoun

Jefferson

Mobile

Coffee

Tuscaloosa

Houston

Lee

$1.6 B

$629.7 M

$430.0 M

$264.2 M

$156.1 M

$93.2 M

$14.9 M

$14.1 M

$13.6 M

$12.8 M

Madison

Calhoun

Jefferson

Mobile

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Tuscaloosa

Dale

Houston

Montgomery

Coffee

Lee

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 19
20 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019

ALASKA 

#33 

$3.5 B SPENT IN 

#5

6.4% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$4,804

PER RESIDENT 

#37 

$1.8 B CONTRACT 

#27 

27,271 NUMBER OF 

#25

$1.7 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and

Equipment: 15% Construction: 27%

Service: 57% Research and

Development: 1%

By Service 

Army 

47% 

Navy/Marines 

7% 

Air Force 

34% 

Other Defense 

12% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 3% 

National Guard:14%

Civilian: 20% 

Active Duty: 64% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

52% 

Navy/Marines 

1% 

Air Force 

46% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Arctic Slope Regional Corp. $173.5 M

Chugach Alaska Corp. $119.1 M

AECOM $96.7 M

Doyon Utilities (DUL) $92.2 M

Neeser Construction Inc. $88.9 M

Indyne $55.0 M

ARCTEC Alaska JV $44.6 M

UNIT-ASRC Construction $38.1 M

Calista $36.8 M

Bering Straits Native Corporation $36.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.0

FY12

$1.8 $1.7 $1.5 $1.5

FY13 FY14

$1.3 $1.2

FY15

$1.2

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$1.7 BILLION 27,271

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Location Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Anchorage 9,942 3,243 2,639 743 16,567

Fairbanks North Star 7,221 1,727 696 77 9,721

Southeast Fairbanks ND 307 206 0 ND

Denali 34 32 91 0 157

Matanuska-Susitna 0 ND 93 ND ND

Kodiak Island 16 18 ND 0 ND

Juneau ND 12 13 0 ND

Bethel 0 ND 13 0 ND

Kenai Peninsula 0 ND ND 0 ND

Nome 0 ND ND 0 ND
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALASKA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Bethel Juneau

Ketchikan Gateway

Denali

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

North Slope

Bristol Bay

Aleutians West

Yukon-Koyukuk

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Denali

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Anchorage

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Denali

Yukon-Koyukuk

Aleutians West

Bristol Bay

Kodiak Island

North Slope

Matanuska-Susitna

(K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

$972.5 M

$390.1 M

$154.9 M

$103.6 M

$100.0 M

$25.5 M

$14.6 M

$12.7 M

$9.4 M

$9.1 M

Anchorage

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Denali

Matanuska-Susitna

Kodiak Island

Juneau

Kenai Peninsula

Bethel

Ketchikan Gateway

$1.0 B

573.7 M

$41.2 M

$13.9 M

$4.4 M 

$2.7 M 

$880.8 K

$599.4 K

$246.4 K

$133.6 K

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Matanuska-Susitna

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Kenai Peninsula

Kodiak Island

Kodiak Island

Anchorage 

Anchorage 

Matanuska-Susitna

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 21 
ARIZONA 

#11

$15.1 B SPENT IN 

#13

4.0% OF STATE GDP

2.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,076

PER RESIDENT 

#10

$12.9 B CONTRACT 

#19

44,737 NUMBER OF 

#20

$2.2 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and

Equipment: 61%

By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

Air Force 

12% 

Other Defense 

13% 

Construction: 16%

25% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 17% 

National 

Guard: 17% 

Civilian: 22% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

15% 

Air Force 

Other Defense 

3% 

Research and

Development: 8%

Service: 15%

49% 

Active Duty: 44% 

38% 

43% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Raytheon $4.8 B

Boeing $1.8 B

Southwest Valley Constructors Co. $1.2 B

Honeywell $945.8 M

Barnard Construction Co. Inc. $673.2 M

Northrop Grumman $641.0 M

General Dynamics $287.4 M

HEICO $156.6 M

Trax International $101.0 M

Patriarch Partners $91.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$12.9 $11.9 $12.1

FY12

$10.8

FY13

$8.9 $8.9 $8.2

FY14

$6.4

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$2.2 BILLION 44,737

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

5,209 2,516 3,465

6,144 2,826 2,244

4,101 2,725 42

3,640 1,335 61

0 198 1,258

17 46 420

ND ND 175

0 0 40

0 ND 31

19 0 0

Reserve Total

5,226 16,416

1,652 12,866

192 7,060

31 5,067

540 1,996

ND ND

0 ND

0 40

0 ND

0 19

County

Maricopa

Pima

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Coconino

Yavapai

Graham

Navajo

Apache

22 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 ARIZONA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Navajo Apache

Graham

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Coconino

Mohave

Yavapai

La Paz

Maricopa

Yuma Pinal

Pima

Cochise

Santa Cruz

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

Pima

Maricopa

Yuma

Cochise

Yavapai

Pinal

Coconino

Mohave

Santa Cruz

La Paz

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$6.6 B

$4.6 B

$939.0 M

$808.6 M

$18.8 M

$16.0 M

$10.5 M

$1.8 M

 $553.2 K

 $339.3 K

Maricopa

Pima

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Coconino

Yavapai

Navajo

Apache

Graham

$715.2 M

$678.1 M

$440.4 M

$240.1 M

$58.4 M

$15.2 M

$5.0 M

$775.3 K

$765.1 K

$572.8 K

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Coconino

Maricopa

Yuma Pinal

Pima

Cochise

Yavapai

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 23
ARKANSAS 

#41

$1.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#40

1.2% OF STATE GDP

0.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$545

PER RESIDENT 

#42 

$1.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#35

18,331 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#38

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 2%

Supplies and

Equipment: 85%

By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

10% 

Air Force 

8% 

Other Defense 

6% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 13% 

National 

Guard: 47% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

3% 

Air Force 

37% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Research and

Development: 1%

Service: 12%

76% 

Active Duty: 20% 

Civilian: 20% 

60% 

Top Defense Contractors 

Aerojet Rocketdyne

Arkansas Lighthouse for Blind Inc.

Trane U.S. Inc.

National Presto Industries

Enviro Systems Inc.

General Dynamics

PPG Industries

Esterline Technologies

Ducommun

MartinFederal Consulting

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.0

$0.8

FY12

$0.6 $0.6 $0.5 $0.5 $0.4

FY13 FY14 FY15

$0.4

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$685.7 MILLION 18,331

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Pulaski 3,556 1,975 3,135

Sebastian 37 379 1,356

Jefferson ND 773 134

Benton 0 37 624

Washington 17 ND 310

Craighead ND 20 274

White ND 11 238

Faulkner ND 28 80

Garland ND 65 42

Pope ND 53 136

(M = millions)

$663.0 M

$21.6 M

$20.3 M

$19.3 M

$16.9 M

$15.8 M

$10.1 M

$9.0 M

$8.4 M

$6.7 M

Reserve Total

1,558 10,224

156 1,928

0 ND

137 798

0 ND

27 ND

0 ND

108 ND

111 ND

12 ND

24 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 ARKANSAS 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Benton

Craighead

Pope

White

Faulkner

Jefferson

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Carroll

Washington

Sebastian

Pulaski

Garland Saline

Jefferson

Ouachita

Calhoun

Columbia

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Ouachita

Pulaski

Jefferson

Calhoun

Columbia

Saline

Sebastian

Garland

Carroll

Washington

(M = millions)

$687.7 M

$113.5 M

$47.2 M 

$19.9 M

$17.4 M

$13.2 M

$8.1 M

$7.2 M 

$6.7 M

$6.7 M

Pulaski

Sebastian

Jefferson

Benton

Washington

Garland

Pope

Craighead

Faulkner

White

$468.0 M

$60.3 M

$53.2 M

$11.1 M

$8.0 M

$7.1 M

$6.0 M

$5.3 M

$4.9 M

$4.4 M 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Pulaski

Washington

Sebastian

Garland

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 25
CALIFORNIA 

#1

$66.2 B SPENT IN 

#28

2.1% OF STATE GDP

12.0%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,676

PER RESIDENT 

#1

$50.2 B CONTRACT 

#1

279,080 NUMBER 

#2 

$16.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 3% Research and 

Development: 11% 

Supplies and 

Equipment: 50% Service: 36% 

By Service 

Army 

10% 

Navy/Marines 

36% 

Air Force 

29% 

Other Defense 

26% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 14% 

National 

Guard: 6% 

Active Duty: 56% Civilian: 23% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

17% 

Navy/Marines 

67% 

Air Force 

15% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors 

Northrop Grumman

Lockheed Martin

General Atomic Technologies

Centene Corp.

McKesson

Boeing

General Dynamics

Raytheon

Aerojet Rocketdyne

Aerospace Corp.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$6.7 B

$3.7 B

$3.2 B

$3.0 B

$2.7 B

$2.5 B

$2.4 B

$1.8 B

$1.6 B

$988.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$50.2

$38.7 $39.5

FY12

$32.7 $34.7 $31.3

FY16 FY17

$33.1

FY13 FY14

$29.7

FY15 FY18 FY19

$16.0 BILLION 279,080

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

San Diego 78,722 24,332 890 9,098 113,042

San Bernardino 13,483 3,514 715 493 18,205

Los Angeles 2,069 3,590 3,081 4,695 13,435

Ventura 4,625 5,861 1,032 1,314 12,832

Solano 6,697 1,644 268 3,592 12,201

Kern 2,485 8,436 287 340 11,548

Riverside 418 2,775 1,309 5,115 9,617

Monterey 4,946 4,079 79 382 9,486

Kings 6,598 854 0 527 7,979

Orange 450 1,099 2,129 3,466 7,144

26 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

CALIFORNIA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Yuba

Solano

Monterey

Kern

San Bernardino

Riverside

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Yolo

Sacramento

San Bernardino Santa Barbara

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

San Diego

Los Angeles

Santa Clara

Sacramento

Orange

Yolo

Ventura

Alameda

Santa Barbara

San Bernardino

(M = millions, B = billions)

$14.0 B

$13.1 B

$4.7 B 

$4.0 B

$4.0 B

$2.7 B 

$1.3 B

$888.0 M

$726.5 M

$649.9 M

San Diego

Ventura

Kern

San Bernardino

Los Angeles

Monterey

Solano

Kings

Riverside

Yuba

$6.6 B

$935.1 M

$920.9 M

$826.3 M

$706.2 M

$705.4 M

$704.9 M

$446.0 M

$418.1 M

$354.3 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Alameda

Santa Clara

Ventura

Orange

Los Angeles

San Diego 

Ventura

Los Angeles

San Diego 

Kings

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 27
COLORADO 

#17

$10.6 B SPENT IN 

#20

2.6% OF STATE GDP

1.9%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,835

PER RESIDENT 

#18

$7.0 B CONTRACT 

#12

61,467 NUMBER OF 

#10

$3.6 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Construction: 7%

Equipment: 16%

Service: 56%

By Service 

Army 

17% 

Navy/Marines 

4% 

Air Force 

Other Defense 

18% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 14% 

National 

Guard: 9%

Civilian: 19% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

4% 

Air Force 

32% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Research and

Development: 21%

Top Defense Contractors 

United Launch Alliance

Lockheed Martin

Raytheon

Jacobs Engineering Group

Bechtel Group

Perspecta

Harris Corp.

Ball Corp.

J.E. Dunn Construction

Parsons Corp.

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$7.0 $6.6

FY12

$6.0 $5.8 $6.1

$5.1

FY13 FY14

$4.8 $4.3

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$3.6 BILLION 61,467

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.4 B

$838.1 M

$540.5 M

$340.8 M

$310.8 M

$271.2 M

$192.1 M

$188.8 M

$158.0 M

$107.6 M

Reserve Total

4,476 46,807

1,801 8,399

563 1,675

900 ND

159 ND

443 769

0 558

ND ND

ND ND

0 ND

County

El Paso

Arapahoe

Denver

Adams

Weld

Jefferson

Pueblo

Boulder

Larimer

Montrose

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

32,545 8,794 992

2,611 1,511 2,476

354 277 481

ND 68 324

ND 96 615

62 264 0

17 424 117

82 59 62

20 13 101

ND ND 123

61% 

Active Duty: 58% 

62% 

28 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

COLORADO FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Weld

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Larimer

Adams

Jefferson Denver

Arapahoe

Douglas

El Paso

Pueblo

Boulder 

Broomfield

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

El Paso

Arapahoe

Douglas

Pueblo

Larimer

Boulder

Jefferson

Denver

Adams

Broomfield

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.7 B 

$2.2 B 

$542.0 M

$342.2 M 

$315.9 M

$309.0 M

$218.6 M

$99.6 M

$98.5 M

$84.1 M

El Paso

Arapahoe

Denver

Adams

Jefferson

Pueblo

Weld

Boulder

Larimer

Douglas

$2.9 B

$427.5 M

$75.4 M

$39.3 M

$37.4 M 

$34.5 M

$22.4 M 

$11.8 M

$5.3 M

$4.1 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Larimer

Boulder

Adams

Jefferson Denver

Arapahoe

Douglas

El Paso

Pueblo

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 29
 

CONNECTICUT 

#6

$19.7 B SPENT IN 

#4 

6.8% OF STATE GDP

3.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$5,521

PER RESIDENT 

#5

$19.0 B CONTRACT 

#38

14,808 NUMBER OF 

#37 

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type Research and

Construction: 0% Development: 9% 

Service: 6% 

Supplies and 

Equipment: 84% 

By Service 

Army 

10% 

Navy/Marines 

72% 

Air Force 

14% 

Other Defense 

4% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 13% 

Active Duty: 36% 

National 

Guard: 32% 

Civilian: 19% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

38% 

Navy/Marines 

48% 

Air Force 

10% 

Other Defense 

5% 

Top Defense Contractors 

United Technologies

Lockheed Martin

General Dynamics

PCX Aerostructures

Ensign-Bickford Industries

Kaman Corp.

Exxelia Dearborn Inc.

Triumph Group Inc.

Sonalysts

Colt Defense Holding

(M = millions, B = billions)

$7.9 B

$5.1 B

$4.5 B

$103.6 M

$82.6 M

$62.6 M

$61.6 M

$53.4 M

$52.0 M

$51.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$19.0

$15.0 $13.6 $12.4 $12.5 $12.3

$9.8

FY12 FY14 FY15 FY16

$9.1

FY13 FY17 FY18 FY19

$718.0 MILLION 14,808

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

New London 3,754 1,531 1,094 354 6,733

Hartford 70 832 2,249 648 3,799

Middlesex ND 68 617 371 ND

New Haven 78 64 428 289 859

Fairfield 13 221 213 301 748

Tolland 50 ND 44 0 ND

Litchfield 0 14 0 0 14

Windham 0 ND 0 0 ND

30 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

CONNECTICUT FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Litchfield

Hartford

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Hartford

Fairfield

New London

New Haven

Middlesex

Tolland

Litchfield

Windham

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$8.5 B

$5.3 B

$4.8 B

$244.0 M

$81.2 M

$36.5 M

$33.5 M

$22.2 M 

New London

Hartford

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven

Tolland

Litchfield

Windham

$389.6 M

$140.6 M

$31.2 M

$26.7 M

$24.7 M 

$4.1 M

$681.7 K

$385.8 K

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Litchfield

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven

Hartford

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 31
DELAWARE 

#48

$0.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#48

0.8% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$651

PER RESIDENT 

#50

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#46

9,998 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#44 

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 1% Research and

Supplies and Development: 16%

Equipment: 24%

Service: 59%

By Service 

Army 

32% 

Navy/Marines 

6% 

Air Force 

25% 

Other Defense 

38% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 23% 

Active Duty: 35% 

National 

Guard: 27% 

Civilian: 15% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

24% 

Navy/Marines 

3% 

Air Force 

71% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors 

Dobco Inc.

SNA International

Phase Sensitive Innovations

Aero Precision Industries

Caesar Rodney School District

Tesla Industries

Great Lakes Dredge and Dock

C.O. Sabino Corp.

Agilent Technologies Inc.

Kalitta Charters

(M = millions)

$48.0 M

$17.7 M

$15.7 M

$15.0 M

$9.5 M

$7.6 M

$6.7 M

$5.2 M

$3.7 M

$2.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.4

$0.3

FY12 FY14

$0.2

FY13 FY15

$0.2 $0.2

$0.2 $0.1

FY16 FY17

$0.1

FY18 FY19

$424.8 MILLION 9,998

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Kent 3,480 978 175 1,688 6,321

New Castle 37 471 2,042 579 3,129

Sussex 0 27 452 57 536

32 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 DELAWARE 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Kent

New Castle

Sussex

(M = millions)

$121.0 M

$75.5 M

$13.0 M

Kent

New Castle

Sussex

$313.5 M

$100.7 M

$9.6 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 33
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

#24 #11 1.2% $9,413 #25 #30 #18

$6.6 B SPENT IN 4.6% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $4.3 B CONTRACT 25,694 NUMBER OF $2.4 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 5%

Supplies and Research and

Equipment: 7% Development: 9%

Service: 79%

By Service 

Army 

11% 

Navy/Marines 

50% 

Air Force 

8% 

Other Defense 

30% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 6% 

National 

Guard: 10%

Active Duty: 32% 

Civilian: 52% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

19% 

Navy/Marines 

63% 

Air Force 

15% 

Other Defense 

3% 

Top Defense Contractors 

Booz Allen Hamilton

Alion Science and Technology

Ernst & Young

CACI

General Dynamics

Sodexo

Government of the United States

Deloitte

Systems Planning and Analysis Inc.

Haystax Technology Inc.

(M = millions)

$201.5 M

$173.8 M

$144.6 M

$142.0 M

$139.4 M

$112.9 M

$103.5 M

$100.0 M

$69.8 M

$65.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$5.1 $4.5 $4.5 $4.3 $4.3

FY12 FY13 FY14 FY18

$4.1 $4.3 $3.8

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY19

$2.4 BILLION 25,694

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

District of Columbia 8,217 13,353 2,602 1,522 25,694

34 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

District of Columbia

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

District of Columbia

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (B= billions)

District of Columbia

(B = billions)

$4.3 B 

District of Columbia

$2.4 B 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 35 
 

FLORIDA 

#4 

$29.8 B SPENT IN 

#19

2.6% OF STATE GDP

5.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,389

PER RESIDENT 

#4 

$22.3 B CONTRACT 

#6

129,913 NUMBER 

#5

$7.5 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 4%

Service: 35%

Development: 5%

Supplies and

Equipment: 56%

By Service 

Army 

23% 

Navy/Marines 

32% 

Air Force 

28% 

Other Defense 

17% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 19% 

Active Duty: 46% 

National 

Guard: 9%

Civilian: 26% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

23% 

Navy/Marines 

41% 

Air Force 

34% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors 

Lockheed Martin

Northrop Grumman

General Dynamics

Leonardo SpA

Honeywell

Crowley

Raytheon

Booz Allen Hamilton

Harris Corp.

CAE Inc.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$4.6 B

$3.3 B

$1.0 B

$771.2 M

$701.6 M

$567.5 M

$498.6 M

$371.3 M

$342.1 M

$280.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$22.3

$15.1 $15.1 $13.9

$11.4 $10.8

FY12 FY13

$9.9

FY14

$8.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

$7.5 BILLION 129,913

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Duval 12,385 9,122 1,864 4,118 27,489

Okaloosa 17,743 7,240 107 2,089 27,179

Escambia 11,366 2,541 189 1,038 15,134

Hillsborough 5,830 2,739 462 4,137 13,168

Miami-Dade 1,171 1,286 281 3,945 6,683

Orange 246 2,449 327 3,149 6,171

Bay 2,100 2,784 494 434 5,812

Brevard 1,630 2,427 373 1,277 5,707

Pinellas 66 351 871 1,286 2,574

Palm Beach 78 260 376 1,107 1,821

36 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FLORIDA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Santa Rosa

Monroe

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Orange

Brevard

Hillsborough

Okaloosa

Duval

Pinellas

Bay

Miami-Dade

Broward

Escambia

(M = millions, B = billions)

$5.3 B

$5.3 B

$2.1 B

$2.1 B

$2.0 B

$1.6 B

$1.0 B

$639.4 M

$431.9 M

$299.2 M

Okaloosa

Duval

Hillsborough

Escambia

Bay

Brevard

Orange

Miami-Dade

Santa Rosa

Monroe

$1.9 B

$1.7 B

$857.5 M

$702.5 M

$431.0 M

$344.3 M 

$333.4 M 

$309.5 M

$108.4 M

$102.8 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Duval

Bay

Okaloosa

Brevard Pinellas

Hillsborough

Broward

Miami-Dade

Orange

Escambia

Duval

Bay

Okaloosa

Brevard

Hillsborough

Miami-Dade

Orange

Escambia

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 37 
GEORGIA 

#13

$14.0 B SPENT IN 

#25

2.2% OF STATE GDP

2.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,320

PER RESIDENT 

#15

$7.2 B CONTRACT 

#5

132,641 NUMBER 

#7 

$6.8 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 4% Research and

Development: 15%

Supplies and

Equipment: 41%

Service: 39%

By Service 

Army 

27% 

Navy/Marines 

10% 

Air Force 

50% 

Other Defense 

12% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 10%

National 

Guard: 11%

Active Duty: 52% 

Civilian: 27% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

64% 

Navy/Marines 

11% 

Air Force 

23% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Lockheed Martin $1.8 B

Georgia Tech Research Corp. $425.8 M

Amec Foster Wheeler $315.0 M

Northrop Grumman $163.0 M

John Wood Group US Holdings Inc. $162.4 M

Ceres Environmental Services Inc. $139.7 M

General Dynamics $137.8 M

Scientific Research Corp. $102.9 M

Envistacom $88.5 M

Meggitt $88.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$9.4

$7.4 $7.2

FY12 FY16

$6.8

FY18 FY19

$6.6 $6.9

$5.6

FY13 FY14

$5.1

FY15 FY17

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$6.8 BILLION 132,641

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian Nati

Guard

onal Reserve Total

Muscogee 24,233 4,462 258 697 29,650

Houston 3,342 15,130 1,242 1,253 20,967

Liberty 15,097 2,532 485 137 18,251

Richmond 11,234 3,441 612 1,685 16,972

Chatham 4,473 1,180 1,784 538 7,975

Cobb 302 1,385 2,587 3,408 7,682

Lowndes 4,562 526 77 274 5,439

Camden 2,359 2,410 0 ND ND

Clayton 52 542 484 2,278 3,356

Dougherty 309 2,207 105 122 2,743

38 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 GEORGIA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Clayton

Liberty

Lowndes

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Fulton

Cobb Gwinnett

Richmond

Houston

Muscogee

Chattahoochee Chatham

Dougherty Camden

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Cobb

Fulton

Houston

Richmond

Chattahoochee

Chatham

Camden

Gwinnett

Muscogee

Dougherty

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.1 B

$1.1 B

$839.7 M

$488.8 M

$367.6 M

$283.7 M

$242.6 M

$238.7 M

$180.2 M

$179.5 M

Houston

Muscogee

Liberty

Richmond

Chatham

Camden

Lowndes

Cobb

Dougherty

Clayton

$1.4 B

$1.2 B

$989.8 M

$947.0 M

$414.0 M

$303.8 M

$299.2 M

$287.8 M

$174.7 M

$122.6 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Cobb

Richmond

Houston Muscogee

Chatham

Dougherty Camden

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 39
HAWAII 

#22 

$7.5 B SPENT IN 

#2 

7.7% OF STATE GDP

1.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$5,280

PER RESIDENT 

#33 

$2.5 B CONTRACT 

#9

70,396 NUMBER OF 

#9

$5.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Equipment: 6%

Construction: 20%

Service: 66%

Research and

Development: 7%

By Service 

Army 

28% 

Navy/Marines 

54% 

Air Force 

8% 

Other Defense 

9% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 6% 

National Guard: 8% 

Civilian: 29% 

Active Duty: 58% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

37% 

Navy/Marines 

47% 

Air Force 

14% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors 

Hensel Phelps Construction

BAE Systems

Peter Kiewit Sons' Inc.

Matson

Harris Corp.

Nan Inc.

Kajima Corporation

AECOM

APTIM Federal Services

Pacific Shipyards International

(M = millions)

$147.9 M

$127.0 M

$84.3 M

$71.0 M

$67.6 M

$50.5 M

$50.0 M

$47.9 M

$40.5 M

$36.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.5 $2.5

FY12

$2.2 $2.0 $2.0 $1.9

FY13 FY14

$1.8 $1.6

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

$5.0 BILLION 70,396

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Honolulu 34,319 19,704 4,663 4,037 62,723

Hawaii ND 179 385 79 ND

Kauai 77 169 107 44 397

Maui 22 63 170 0 255

40 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 HAWAII 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Kauai

Honolulu

Maui

Hawaii

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Honolulu

Kauai

Maui

Hawaii

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.3 B 

$116.0 M

$20.4 M

$11.3 M

Honolulu

Hawaii

Kauai

Maui

$4.5 B

$26.9 M

$26.4 M

$12.7 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Kauai

Honolulu

Maui

Hawaii

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 41
IDAHO 

#46

$0.7 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#47 

0.8% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$394

PER RESIDENT 

#47 

$0.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#44 

10,756 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#43 

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 6% Research and

Supplies and

Equipment: 39%

By Service 

Army 

13% 

Navy/Marines 

10% 

Air Force 

Other Defense 

Development: 5%

Service: 51%

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 10%

National 

Guard: 42% 

Active Duty: 33% 

Civilian: 15% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

44% 

Navy/Marines 

4% 

Air Force 

52% 

Other Defense 

0% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Brad Hall & Associates $51.6 M

Tanadgusix Corp. (TC) $40.8 M

J.E. Dunn Construction $23.8 M

PKL Services $14.7 M

AERO Specialties $11.4 M

Johnson Controls $8.3 M

Lightforce USA $7.0 M

General Dynamics $6.3 M

Milpower $5.9 M

Ouzinkie Native Corporation $5.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.4

40% 

37% 

FY13

$0.3

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2

FY12 FY14 FY15

$0.1 $0.1

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$428.5 MILLION 10,756

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Reserve

701

28

164

105

0

87

0

0

0

0

Total

4,502

4,122

ND

328

ND

ND

128

ND

107

ND

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Ada 80 943 2,778

Elmore 3,387 475 232

Bannock ND 11 157

Kootenai 0 74 149

Canyon ND ND 235

Twin Falls ND ND 87

Bonneville 22 13 93

Jerome 0 ND 122

Cassia 0 0 107

Nez Perce ND ND 93

42 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 IDAHO 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Bonner

Latah

Twin Falls

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Kootenai

Clearwater

Idaho

Elmore

Blaine

Canyon

Ada Bonneville

Bingham

Bannock

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Elmore

Bonneville

Ada

Kootenai

Bingham

Clearwater

Canyon

Bannock

Blaine

Idaho

(M = millions)

$120.9 M

$58.1 M

$51.2 M

$12.8 M

$12.5 M

$7.0 M

$5.9 M

$1.8 M

$1.5 M

 $949.1 K

Elmore

Ada

Kootenai

Bannock

Canyon

Clearwater

Bonneville

Twin Falls

Bonner

Latah

$222.9 M

$148.2 M

$10.2 M

$7.1 M

$5.4 M

$5.3 M

$4.6 M

$4.0 M

$3.1 M

$3.0 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Kootenai

Clearwater

Elmore

Canyon

Ada Bonneville

Bannock

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 43
ILLINOIS 

#20

$8.8 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#46

1.0% OF STATE GDP

1.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$695

PER RESIDENT 

#20

$6.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#15

58,611 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#19

$2.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 1%

Service: 22%

Development: 5%

Supplies and

Equipment: 72%

By Service 

Army 

17% 

Navy/Marines 

17% 

Air Force 

21% 

Other Defense 

45% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 19% 

Active Duty: 37% 

National 

Guard: 22% 

Civilian: 21% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

42% 

Navy/Marines 

35% 

Air Force 

20% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Northrop Grumman $945.4 M

BP $620.3 M

Cardinal Health $464.7 M

W.S. Darley and Co. $444.7 M

CDW Government $376.1 M

SupplyCore $308.3 M

AAR $291.4 M

United Technologies $227.3 M

Caterpillar $213.5 M

Alion Science and Technology $171.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$7.4 $7.4

FY12

$6.6 $5.8

$4.8 $5.0

$3.8

$2.8

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$2.2 BILLION 58,611

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Lake

St. Clair

Cook

Rock Island

Sangamon

Peoria

Will

DuPage

Champaign

Winnebago

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

15,760 1,574 215

4,637 3,986 1,112

367 716 2,488

371 4,288 340

60 551 2,108

45 377 1,751

ND 71 122

50 121 0

29 291 261

31 35 368

Reserve Total

4,183 21,732

1,684 11,419

2,037 5,608

422 5,421

131 2,850

480 2,653

737 ND

534 705

87 668

195 629

44 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 ILLINOIS 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Will

Champaign

Macon Sangamon

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Rock Island

Peoria

Madison

St. Clair

Williamson

Winnebago McHenry

Lake

Cook

DuPage

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Cook

Lake

DuPage

St. Clair

Winnebago

Peoria

Rock Island

Williamson

Madison

McHenry

(M = millions)

$2.4 B 

$1.1 B

$966.9 M

$755.6 M

$604.9 M

$225.7 M

$161.7 M

$133.6 M

$46.3 M

$36.2 M

St. Clair

Lake

Rock Island

Cook

Sangamon

Peoria

Champaign

DuPage

Will

Macon

$766.1 M

$549.6 M

$395.2 M

$161.9 M

$106.1 M

$75.5 M

$32.8 M

$29.7 M

$14.5 M

$12.5 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Rock Island

Peoria

Lake

Cook

DuPage

St. Clair

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 45
INDIANA 

#30

$5.4 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#36

1.4% OF STATE GDP

1.0%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$800

PER RESIDENT 

#27 

$4.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#26

31,568 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#29

$1.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 1%

Service: 26%

Supplies and

Development: 7%

Equipment: 66%

By Service 

Army 

31% 

Navy/Marines 

36% 

Air Force 

16% 

Other Defense 

16% 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 3% 

Civilian: 39% 

Reserve: 17% 

National 

Guard: 41% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

53% 

Navy/Marines 

18% 

Air Force 

14% 

Other Defense 

15% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Rolls-Royce $858.0 M

MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. $760.9 M

Raytheon $507.1 M

AmeriQual Group $192.1 M

ERAPSCO $165.6 M

SAIC $146.5 M

Honeywell $100.5 M

Mantech TSG-2 JV $81.3 M

Talbert Manufacturing Inc. $73.0 M

Cummins $71.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.0

$3.0 $3.2 $3.1 $2.9 $2.7

FY12

$2.4 $2.1

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$1.4 BILLION 31,568

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Marion 313 5,575 2,425

Martin 61 4,919 0

Miami 17 513 38

Johnson 314 259 1,465

Allen 39 272 1,370

Vigo 21 168 1,040

Lake ND 62 543

Tippecanoe 75 30 525

St. Joseph 71 51 257

Vanderburgh 57 30 370

Reserve Total

1,388 9,701

0 4,980

1,849 2,417

250 2,288

338 2,019

204 1,433

160 ND

130 760

354 733

161 618

46 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 INDIANA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Lake

Tippecanoe

Shelby

Johnson

Vigo

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Whitley

Jasper Allen

Miami

Marion

Bartholomew

Martin

Daviess

Vanderburgh

St. Joseph

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Marion

St. Joseph

Martin

Allen

Vanderburgh

Whitley

Daviess

Jasper

Bartholomew

Miami

(M = millions)

$1.4 B

$925.1 M

$365.9 M

$293.8 M

$203.7 M

$173.3 M

$119.3 M

$73.0 M

$72.4 M 

$46.5 M

Marion

Martin

Miami

Johnson

Allen

Vigo

Tippecanoe

St. Joseph

Lake

Shelby

$525.2 M

$410.9 M

$79.8 M

$75.3 M

$52.5 M

$43.8 M

$ 28.1 M

$16.6 M

$16.0 M

$14.1 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Allen

Miami

Martin

St. Joseph

Marion

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 47
IOWA 

#39

$2.5 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#39

1.3% OF STATE GDP

0.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$788

PER RESIDENT 

#34 

$2.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#41

12,920 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#48

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 0% Development: 6%

Service: 11%

Supplies and

Equipment: 83%

By Service 

Army 

24% 

Navy/Marines 

47% 

Air Force 

22% 

Other Defense 

6% 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 2% 

Civilian: 13% Reserve: 19% 

National Guard: 66% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

78% 

Navy/Marines 

3% 

Air Force 

18% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

United Technologies $1.2 B

American Ordnance $279.1 M

Rockwell Collins $207.5 M

Lockheed Martin $135.3 M

Cobham $91.0 M

Data Link Solutions $27.6 M

Rockwell Collins-ESA Vision Systems $25.4 M

Dexter Apache Holdings Inc. $15.9 M

Carver Pump Company $14.8 M

Rosenboom Machine & Tool Inc. $12.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.1 $1.9

$1.6

$1.2 $1.1 $1.1 $1.1 $1.0

FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$356.2 MILLION 12,920

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Polk 113 761 3,217

Woodbury ND 267 1,093

Scott ND 172 286

Linn ND 107 328

Johnson 45 30 415

Black Hawk 29 68 374

Boone 0 58 363

Dubuque ND 28 227

Pottawattamie 0 16 246

Webster 0 36 201

Reserve Total

1,200 5,291

50 ND

226 ND

229 ND

148 638

95 566

0 421

134 ND

64 326

42 279

48 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 IOWA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Dubuque

Webster Black Hawk

Woodbury Linn Boone

Polk

Johnson

Scott

Pottawattamie

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

O'Brien

Bremer

Linn

Johnson

Scott

Muscatine

Union Lee Des Moines

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Linn

Des Moines

Scott

Polk

Muscatine

O'Brien

Bremer

Johnson

Lee

Union

(M = millions)

$1.6 B

$280.1 M

$163.0 M

$59.7 M

$25.0 M

$12.1 M

$8.7 M

$8.4 M

$3.7 M 

$2.4 M 

Polk

Woodbury

Scott

Linn

Johnson

Black Hawk

Boone

Dubuque

Webster

Pottawattamie

$180.4 M

$41.0 M

$18.4 M

$16.1 M

$15.1 M

$13.8 M

$12.4 M

$7.3 M 

$6.3 M

$5.2 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Polk

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 49
KANSAS 

#34 

$3.4 B SPENT IN 

#30

1.9% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,162

PER RESIDENT 

#39

$1.3 B CONTRACT 

#21

38,960 NUMBER OF 

#21

$2.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 5% Research and

Development: 3%

Supplies and Service: 37% Equipment: 55%

By Service 

Army 

45% 

Navy/Marines 

14% 

Air Force 

28% 

Other Defense 

12% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 9%

National 

Guard: 17% 

Active Duty: 56% 

Civilian: 18% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

79% 

Navy/Marines 

1% 

Air Force 

18% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

General Electric $201.2 M

Textron $131.4 M

Spirit Aerosystems Holdings $94.2 M

Northrop Grumman $81.2 M

Leading Technology Composites $51.4 M

Honeywell $33.1 M

MMC Corp. $31.9 M

D-J Engineering Inc. $30.0 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $29.1 M

Day & Zimmermann Group $27.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.6 $1.6

$1.3

FY12 FY14

$1.3

$1.0 $1.0

FY13

$0.9 $0.8

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$2.0 BILLION 38,960

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Reserve Total

Geary 15,207 2,613 115 123 18,058

Sedgwick 2,904 999 1,772 1,623 7,298

Leavenworth 3,434 2,482 220 354 6,490

Shawnee 30 591 1,889 320 2,830

Johnson 36 96 427 355 914

Riley 32 148 228 155 563

Saline 0 48 206 71 325

Douglas 42 21 98 75 236

Crawford ND ND 158 34 ND

Ellis 0 15 73 108 196

50 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 KANSAS 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Riley

Wyandotte

Ellis

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Leavenworth

Geary

Shawnee

Douglas

Johnson

Miami

Butler

Sedgwick 

Labette

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Sedgwick

Geary

Cowley

Leavenworth

Johnson

Butler

Labette

Douglas

Miami

Shawnee

(M = millions)

$436.4 M

$229.7 M

$206.9 M

$174.8 M

$124.3 M

$37.5 M

$27.7 M 

$18.6 M

$17.9 M

$17.1 M

Geary

Leavenworth

Sedgwick

Shawnee

Johnson

Riley

Saline

Douglas

Wyandotte

Ellis

$966.4 M

$534.9 M

$318.9 M

$107.3 M

$25.0 M

$24.1 M

$10.8 M

$9.2 M

$6.1 M

$4.7 M 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Cowley

Geary

Shawnee

Johnson

Douglas

Leavenworth

Sedgwick 

Saline

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 51
 

KENTUCKY 

#14

$12.6 B SPENT IN 

#8

5.7% OF STATE GDP

2.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,810

PER RESIDENT 

#13

$9.7 B CONTRACT 

#17

54,754 NUMBER OF 

#14

$2.9 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type Research and Development: 0%

Supplies and Construction:1%

Equipment: 10%

Service: 89%

By Service 

Army 

10% 

Navy/Marines 

6% 

Air Force 

1% 

Other Defense 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 9%

National 

Guard: 14%

Civilian: 18% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

1% 

Air Force 

3% 

Other Defense 

2% 

83% 

Active Duty: 59% 

94% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Humana $6.7 B

Lockheed Martin $691.0 M

Raytheon $323.8 M

UPS $194.8 M

BAE Systems $178.1 M

Bechtel Parsons Blue Grass JV $159.9 M

Boeing $115.4 M

Inverness Technologies Inc. $58.9 M

SAIC $56.3 M

SourceAmerica $49.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$9.7

$7.8

$6.1 $5.6 $5.8 $5.8

FY12 FY13 FY14

$5.3 $5.0

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$2.9 BILLION 54,754

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Reserve Total

Christian 26,803 2,574 40 111 29,528

Hardin 5,031 4,338 126 2,543 12,038

Jefferson 135 1,198 1,897 725 3,955

Madison ND 1,025 736 27 ND

Franklin 19 284 1,125 0 1,428

Fayette 75 114 255 553 997

Boone ND 25 415 ND ND

Campbell ND 31 0 409 ND

Muhlenberg 0 76 222 0 298

McCracken ND 13 80 174 ND

52 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 KENTUCKY 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Boone Campbell

Franklin

Fayette

Daviess Hardin

Muhlenberg

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Jefferson Fayette

Menifee

Hardin Madison Boyle

Laurel

Christian McCreary

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Jefferson

Fayette

Hardin

Christian

Madison

Laurel

Boyle

Boone

Menifee

McCreary

(M = millions, B = billions)

$7.5 B

$811.7 M

$450.4 M

$339.2 M

$193.7 M

$179.6 M

$30.6 M

$27.1 M

$22.5 M

$16.5 M

Christian

Hardin

Jefferson

Madison

Franklin

Fayette

Boone

Muhlenberg

Campbell

Daviess

$1.7 B

$724.8 M

$158.8 M

$74.7 M 

$60.7 M

$29.5 M

$8.6 M

$8.0 M

$6.5 M

$6.3 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Jefferson

Madison

Boone

Christian

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 53
LOUISIANA 

#35

$3.2 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#42 

1.2% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$678

PER RESIDENT 

#38

$1.5 B CONTRACT 

PENDING 

#23 

37,787 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#26

$1.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 5%

Supplies and

Equipment: 50%

By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

Air Force 

10% 

Other Defense 

9% 

Development: 3%

30% 

Service: 42%

51% 

Active Duty: 38% 

62% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Textron $236.9 M

Gulf Island Fabrication Inc. $129.2 M

Nova Global Supply and Services $75.2 M

AECOM $57.8 M

Hornbeck Offshore Services $50.9 M

Thoma-Sea Marine Constructors $46.8 M

Birdon America Inc. $45.1 M

JGILS $35.4 M

Gravois Aluminum Boats $29.6 M

Swiftships $28.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.9

FY12

$1.5 $1.3 $1.3 $1.2 $1.2

FY13 FY14 FY15

$1.1

$0.8

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$1.7 BILLION 37,787

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 15% 

National 

Guard: 30% 

Civilian: 17% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

11% 

Air Force 

26% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Reserve

22

2,006

2,593

ND

613

0

35

ND

162

99

Total

9,323

8,846

7,835

ND

1,332

ND

866

ND

ND

532

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Parish Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Vernon 7,780 1,397 124

Bossier 5,183 1,430 227

Orleans 954 1,711 2,577

Rapides ND 419 1,492

East Baton Rouge 155 105 459

Tangipahoa ND 112 778

Iberville 87 36 708

Plaquemines 87 652 0

Calcasieu ND 41 348

Lafayette 43 45 345

54 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 LOUISIANA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Webster

Rapides Tangipahoa

Iberville

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Bossier

East Baton Rouge

St. Tammany

Orleans

Lafourche

Iberia

Terrebonne

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Orleans

Vernon

Terrebonne

Bossier

St. Tammany

Lafourche

Jefferson

East Baton Rouge

Iberia

St. Mary

(M = millions)

$436.9 M

$309.1 M

$171.4 M

$122.3 M

$100.5 M

$75.6 M

$46.9 M

$43.2 M 

$31.0 M

$30.9 M

Vernon

Bossier

Orleans

Rapides

Plaquemines

East Baton Rouge

Iberville

Tangipahoa

Lafayette

Webster

$503.8 M

$483.8 M

$362.7 M

$63.6 M

$43.0 M

$36.2 M

$24.8 M

$24.0 M

$16.7 M

$11.0 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Jefferson

St. Mary

Bossier

Orleans

East Baton Rouge

Vernon

Vernon

Plaquemines

Lafayette

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 55
MAINE 

#32 

$4.0 B SPENT IN 

#7 

5.8% OF STATE GDP

0.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,961

PER RESIDENT 

#30

$3.2 B CONTRACT 

#43 

12,376 NUMBER OF 

#36

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and 

Construction: 4% Development: 1%

Service: 20%

Supplies and

Equipment: 76%

By Service 

Army 

2% 

Navy/Marines 

Air Force 

0% 

Other Defense 

13% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 5% Active Duty: 1% 

National 

Guard: 24% 

Civilian: 70% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

21% 

Navy/Marines 

62% 

Air Force 

11% 

Other Defense 

7% 

86% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

General Dynamics $2.4 B

Martin's Point Health Care $354.7 M

Methuen Construction $62.3 M

Cianbro Companies $52.7 M

L. S. Black Constructors Inc. $28.7 M

City of Bangor $24.0 M

Precision Partners LLC $21.3 M

Innovyze Inc. $17.7 M

Intermat $16.4 M

CCI Energy and Construction Services $12.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$3.2

$2.6

$2.1

FY12 FY13

$1.7 $1.7 $1.4 $1.4

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17

$1.2

FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$749.7 MILLION 12,376

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Reserve Total

173 ND

144 ND

ND ND

0 ND

163 661

0 408

91 ND

0 ND

0 99

0 ND

York ND 6,962 78

Penobscot ND 398 1,505

Kennebec ND 192 615

Aroostook ND 604 98

Cumberland 23 76 399

Sagadahoc 86 322 0

Androscoggin ND 20 85

Washington ND 72 40

Oxford 0 0 99

Somerset ND ND 55

56 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 MAINE 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Aroostook

Penobscot

Oxford Washington

York

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Sagadahoc

York

Cumberland

Penobscot

Kennebec

Washington

Oxford

Hancock

Waldo

Aroostook

(M = millions)

$2.4 B 

$382.6 M

$370.6 M

$36.7 M

$23.5 M

$22.8 M

$5.3 M

$4.0 M

$2.8 M

$1.4 M

York

Penobscot

Sagadahoc

Aroostook

Kennebec

Cumberland

Washington

Androscoggin

Hancock

Oxford

$545.9 M

$69.4 M

$39.0 M

$31.2 M

$31.0 M

$19.2 M

$5.5 M

$3.2 M 

$2.2 M 

$1.5 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Penobscot

Androscoggin

Hancock Waldo

Kennebec

Sagadahoc

Cumberland

Kennebec

Sagadahoc

Cumberland

Washington

Hancock

Oxford

York

Aroostook

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 57 
MARYLAND 

#5

$26.1 B SPENT IN 

#6

6.0% OF STATE GDP

4.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$4,311

PER RESIDENT 

#6

$18.4 B CONTRACT 

#8

94,560 NUMBER OF 

#4 

$7.6 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 4% Research and 

Supplies and Development: 15%

Equipment: 26%

Service: 55%

By Service 

Army 

26% 

Navy/Marines 

37% 

Air Force 

12% 

Other Defense 

25% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 13% 

National 

Guard: 7% Active Duty: 30% 

Civilian: 50% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

38% 

Navy/Marines 

36% 

Air Force 

16% 

Other Defense 

10% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Lockheed Martin $1.2 B

Northrop Grumman $1.1 B

Johns Hopkins University $1.0 B

Leidos $819.9 M

BAE Systems $560.5 M

General Dynamics $482.7 M

Textron $473.7 M

CACI $425.4 M

Johns Hopkins Health System Corp. $422.4 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $420.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$18.4 $16.9

$14.4 $14.8 $13.8

FY12 FY13 FY14

$12.3 $12.9

$10.4

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$7.6 BILLION 94,560

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County/City

Anne Arundel

Prince George's

Harford

St. Mary's

Montgomery

Baltimore

Frederick

Charles

Baltimore City

Allegany

Active Civilian

Duty

12,753

4,483

831

2,306

4,809

81

1,276

584

73

1,038

8,813

4,732

10,742

10,285

6,366

453

2,233

2,326

1,029

ND

National

Guard

430

1,028

807

65

191

2,662

104

97

439

53

Reserve

3,507

4,659

502

19

515

793

246

675

1,093

149

Total

25,503

14,902

12,882

12,675

11,881

3,989

3,859

3,682

2,634

ND

58 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MARYLAND FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Frederick Baltimore Harford

Baltimore City

Howard

Montgomery

Anne Arundel

Prince George's

Charles

St. Mary's

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Anne Arundel

Montgomery

St. Mary's

Harford

Baltimore

Howard

Prince George's

Baltimore City

Frederick

Charles

(M = millions, B = billions)

$3.6 B

$3.0 B

$3.0 B

$2.5 B

$1.7 B

$1.5 B

$1.2 B

$586.9 M

$448.8 M

$384.9 M

Anna Arundel

St. Mary's

Harford

Montgomery

Prince George's

Frederick

Charles

Baltimore City

Baltimore

Allegany

$1.9 B

$1.3 B

$1.2 B

$1.1 B

$1.0 B

$322.6 M

$261.0 M

$145.0 M

$129.7 M

$94.0 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Frederick Baltimore Harford

Baltimore City

Montgomery

Prince George's

Anne Arundel

Charles

St. Mary's

Allegany

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 59 
 

MASSACHUSETTS 

#10

$15.8 B SPENT IN 

#21

2.6% OF STATE GDP

2.9%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,298

PER RESIDENT 

#8

$14.7 B CONTRACT 

#32 

23,696 NUMBER OF 

#32 

$1.1 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0%

Research and

Development: 23%

Supplies and

Equipment: 59% Service: 18%

By Service 

Army 

22% 

Navy/Marines 

36% 

Air Force 

25% 

Other Defense 

16% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 9%

Civilian: 29% 

Reserve: 28% 

National 

Guard: 34% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

51% 

Navy/Marines 

8% 

Air Force 

37% 

Other Defense 

4% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Raytheon $4.8 B

General Electric $1.8 B

General Dynamics $1.7 B

Massachusetts Institute of Technology $1.1 B

Charles Stark Draper Laboratory $344.8 M

MITRE $342.0 M

Noble Sales & Logistics $309.8 M

Oasis Systems $262.5 M

Rolls-Royce $198.9 M

QinetiQ Group $185.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$14.7

$13.0

$10.7 $10.7 $10.4

FY12 FY13

$9.5 $9.3 $9.1

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

$1.1 BILLION 23,696

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Middlesex 1,185 4,707 2,016 2,108 10,016

Hampden 165 1,111 1,555 2,825 5,656

Barnstable 86 436 1,935 0 2,457

Suffolk 461 231 123 322 1,137

Worcester 26 77 605 226 934

Bristol ND 70 407 412 ND

Plymouth 34 45 348 447 874

Norfolk ND 15 401 260 ND

Essex 14 169 374 31 588

Hampshire ND 19 178 0 ND

60 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MASSACHUSETTS FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Essex

Suffolk

Norfolk

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Essex

Berkshire

Middlesex

Hampshire Worcester Suffolk

Norfolk

Bristol

Barnstable

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Middlesex

Essex

Berkshire

Bristol

Norfolk

Plymouth

Suffolk

Worcester

Barnstable

Hampshire

(M = millions)

$7.2 B 

$4.1 B

$880.9 M

$868.9 M

$462.6 M

$453.0 M

$356.1 M

$189.5 M

$127.9 M

$88.9 M

Middlesex

Hampden

Barnstable

Suffolk

Plymuth

Essex

Worcester

Norfolk

Bristol

Berkshire

$642.7 M

$184.3 M

$93.0 M

$67.2 M

$23.5 M

$22.0 M

$18.5 M

$17.3 M

$17.2 M

$8.3 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Middlesex

Berkshire

Hampden

Barnstable

Worcester

Plymouth

Bristol Plymouth

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 61
MICHIGAN 

#25

$6.5 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#44 

1.2% OF STATE GDP

1.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$653

PER RESIDENT 

#21

$5.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#29

26,010 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#30

$1.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 0%

Development: 8%

Service: 20%

Supplies and

Equipment: 72%

By Service 

Army 

73% 

Navy/Marines 

8% 

Air Force 

5% 

Other Defense 

14% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 4% 

Reserve: 18% 

Civilian: 37% 

National 

Guard: 41% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

72% 

Navy/Marines 

9% 

Air Force 

12% 

Other Defense 

6% 

Top Defense Contractors 

General Dynamics

BAE Systems

ManTech

L3 Technologies

Peckham Vocational Industries

Loc Performance Products

Aircraft Appliances and Equipment Limited $74.9 M

General Electric $74.5 M

AAR $51.5 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $51.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$5.2 $4.6

$3.4

FY12

$3.0 $2.7 $2.6

FY16 FY17

$2.9

$1.8

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY18 FY19

$1.3 BILLION 26,010

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Macomb 237 6,666 1,433

Calhoun 42 1,334 948

Wayne 212 342 1,339

Kalamazoo 12 79 957

Kent 54 88 767

Clinton ND ND 858

Oakland 14 259 156

Ingham 159 430 141

Eaton 38 68 499

Saginaw ND ND 321

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.2 B

$701.6 M

$202.6 M

$149.8 M

$136.5 M

$95.4 M

Reserve

1,163

307

450

772

399

153

579

ND

ND

260

Total

9,499

2,631

2,343

1,820

1,308

ND

1,008

ND

ND

ND

62 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 MICHIGAN 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Ingham

Eaton

Calhoun

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Dickinson

Wexford

Muskegon

Kent

Clinton

Oakland Macomb

Ingham Wayne

Washtenaw

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Macomb

Oakland

Wayne

Kent

Muskegon

Washtenaw

Wexford

Clinton

Dickinson

Ingham

(M = millions)

$3.5 B

$243.1 M

$216.9 M

$180.0 M

$163.6 M

$134.7 M

$104.7 M

$103.6 M

$99.9 M

$78.1 M

Macomb

Calhoun

Wayne

Clinton

Oakland

Ingham

Kalamazoo

Kent

Washtenaw

Eaton

$736.1 M

$143.8 M

$76.6 M

$47.5 M

$38.6 M

$37.9 M

$35.9 M

$26.5 M

$18.3 M

$18.0 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Kent

Kent

Washtenaw

Wayne

Macomb

Clinton

Oakland

Kalamazoo

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 63
MINNESOTA 

#38

$2.7 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#49

0.7% OF STATE GDP

0.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$473 

PER RESIDENT 

#35

$2.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#33 

22,155 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#40

$0.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 0% Development: 6%

Service: 7%

Supplies and

Equipment: 87%

By Service 

Army 

39% 

Navy/Marines 

35% 

Air Force 

13% 

Other Defense 

13% 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 2% 

Civilian: 12% 

Reserve: 25% 

National Guard: 60% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

72% 

Navy/Marines 

6% 

Air Force 

21% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Northrop Grumman $448.2 M

BAE Systems $282.3 M

Avtron Industrial Automation Inc. $214.9 M

Lockheed Martin $168.6 M

Cummins $143.1 M

General Dynamics $94.5 M

Honeywell $81.3 M

United Technologies $52.0 M

UnitedHealth Group $40.5 M

Alcoa Extrusions Inc. $33.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.2 $3.9 $4.0

FY12 FY13 FY14

$3.5

FY15 FY16 FY17

$3.0

$2.0 $1.7

$0.9

FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$619.2 MILLION 22,155

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Hennepin

Ramsey

St. Louis

Morrison

Dakota

Stearns

Washington

Blue Earth

Crow Wing

Wright

Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

347 660 1,795 3,807 6,609

51 917 1,795 802 3,565

11 334 1,716 107 2,168

ND 407 1,360 0 ND

ND 55 937 0 ND

ND 105 443 134 ND

0 11 659 0 670

32 13 189 193 427

26 19 218 99 362

0 ND 161 142 ND

64 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MINNESOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

St. Louis

Morrison

Washington Hennepin

Ramsey Dakota

Rice

Blue Earth

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

St. Louis

Crow Wing

Sherburne Anoka

Hennepin

Ramsey

Carver Dakota

Blue Earth Olmsted

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Hennepin

Anoka

Blue Earth

Dakota

Ramsey

Sherburne

Olmsted

Carver

Crow Wing

St. Louis

(M = millions)

$1.1 B

$481.4 M

$214.0 M

$82.3 M

$66.6 M

$46.5 M

$16.8 M

$13.9 M

$12.4 M

$8.0 M

Hennepin

Ramsey

St. Louis

Dakota

Morrison

Stearns

Washington

Blue Earth

Rice

Crow Wing

$222.6 M

$118.7 M

$56.2 M

$49.6 M

$48.5 M

$17.7 M

$9.9 M

$9.5 M

$8.6 M

$7.8 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Crow Wing

Stearns

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 65 
MISSISSIPPI 

#26

$6.3 B SPENT IN 

#10

5.3% OF STATE GDP

1.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,108

PER RESIDENT 

#24 

$4.5 B CONTRACT 

#22 

38,283 NUMBER OF 

#24 

$1.8 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and 

Construction: 2% Development: 3%

Supplies and

Equipment: 65% 

By Service 

Army 

9% 

Navy/Marines 

Air Force 

14% 

Other Defense 

4% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 11% 

National 

Guard: 31% 

Civilian: 25% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

24% 

Air Force 

Other Defense 

1% 

Service: 30%

74% 

Active Duty: 33% 

41% 

34% 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Top Defense Contractors 

Huntington Ingalls

L3 Technologies

Olin Corp.

Cooper Crouse-Hinds

Great Lakes Dredge and Dock

Vision Technologies Systems

Seemann Composites Inc.

Mississippi State University

EMR Inc.

United States Marine Inc.

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$5.9

$5.2

FY12

$4.7

FY13 FY17 FY18

$4.5

$2.9 $2.5 $2.1

FY15 FY16

$2.2

FY14 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$1.8 BILLION 38,283

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.7 B

$768.3 M

$109.0 M

$75.4 M

$56.7 M

$53.2 M

$49.1 M

$44.4 M

$35.9 M

$28.5 M

County

Harrison

Lauderdale

Warren

Hinds

Lowndes

Hancock

Forrest

Rankin

Jackson

Lee

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

7,921 2,337 945

1,126 659 1,257

ND 2,570 154

40 407 1,386

1,520 586 81

563 1,328 56

382 397 793

0 353 1,357

33 524 244

28 92 511

Reserve

2,045

289

275

540

93

ND

213

0

19

122

Total

13,248

3,331

ND

2,373

2,280

ND

1,785

1,710

820

753

66 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 MISSISSIPPI 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Tippah

Lauderdale Hinds

Forrest

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Lafayette

Lowndes

Oktibbeha Madison

Warren Scott

Hinds

Jackson

Hancock Harrison

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Jackson

Madison

Harrison

Lowndes

Lafayette

Warren

Hinds

Hancock

Oktibbeha

Scott

(M = millions)

$2.8 B

$695.7 M

$345.4 M

$119.4 M

$109.7 M

$103.5 M

$86.3 M

$59.9 M

$39.9 M

$26.3 M

Harrison

Warren

Hancock

Lowndes

Lauderdale

Hinds

Forrest

Jackson

Rankin

Tippah

$587.9 M

$218.3 M

$156.2 M

$140.2 M

$127.4 M

$92.9 M

$82.8 M

$53.5 M

$51.8 M

$31.6 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Lowndes

Warren

Jackson

Harrison

Rankin

Hancock

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 67
MISSOURI 

#12

$15.0 B SPENT IN 

#12

4.5% OF STATE GDP

2.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,440

PER RESIDENT 

#9

$13.4 B CONTRACT 

#20

44,345 NUMBER OF 

#27 

$1.6 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 5%

Development: 5%

Supplies and

Equipment: 74%

By Service 

Army 

14% 

Navy/Marines 

Air Force 

Other Defense 

12% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 17% 

National 

Guard: 26% 

Civilian: 18% 

Allocations, By Service 

Service: 17%

33% 

41% 

Active Duty: 38% 

Army 

70% 

Navy/Marines 

9% 

Air Force 

20% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Boeing $8.8 B

Express Scripts $637.7 M

Leonardo SpA $497.2 M

McCarthy Hitt - Next NGA West JV $337.1 M

Northrop Grumman $324.8 M

World Wide Technology $322.6 M

Cerner Corporation $138.0 M

EaglePicher Technologies LLC $122.4 M

J.E. Dunn Construction $79.2 M

GKN America Corp. $67.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$13.1 $13.4

$9.5 $9.9

FY12

$8.1

FY13

$6.8 $6.1

FY14 FY15 FY16

$6.2

FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$1.6 BILLION 44,345

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County/City Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Pulaski 12,073 3,050 279

Johnson 3,836 1,071 1,191

Jackson 86 830 926

St. Louis 62 559 1,426

Greene 17 290 998

St. Louis City 261 780 37

Buchanan 12 296 1,320

Cole 29 351 887

St. Charles ND 79 0

Cass 0 27 122

Reserve Total

430 15,832

1,021 7,119

1,806 3,648

1,144 3,191

594 1,899

727 1,805

61 1,689

98 1,365

854 ND

421 570

68 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 MISSOURI 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Buchanan

Cole

Pulaski

Greene

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Clay

Jackson

Johnson St. Louis

St. Louis City

Jefferson

Jasper

Howell

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

St. Louis

Jefferson

Jackson

St. Louis City

Pulaski

Clay

Jasper

Johnson

St. Charles

Howell

(M = millions)

$10.5 B

$710.8 M

$545.9 M

$439.6 M

$333.9 M

$174.1 M

$172.7 M

$138.9 M

$133.1 M

$54.4 M

Pulaski

Johnson

Jackson

St. Louis City

St. Louis

Cole

Buchanan

Greene

St. Charles

Jasper

$602.9 M

$315.6 M

$122.4 M

$99.1 M

$88.0 M

$61.8 M

$54.4 M

$38.2 M

$24.3 M 

$11.2 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Pulaski

St. Louis City

St. Charles

St. Louis

Jackson

Jasper

Johnson

St. Charles

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 69 
MONTANA 

#47 

$0.7 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#41

1.2% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$617

PER RESIDENT 

#46

$0.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#48

9,015 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#46

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 7% Research and

Development: 7% Supplies and

Equipment: 28%

Service: 59%

By Service 

Army 

12% 

Navy/Marines 

5% 

Air Force 

69% 

Other Defense 

14% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 9%

Active Duty: 37% 

National 

Guard: 38% 

Civilian: 16% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

41% 

Navy/Marines 

2% 

Air Force 

56% 

Other Defense 

0% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

S&K Technologies $146.2 M

2101 LLC $20.5 M

WHH Nisqually-Garco JV $18.7 M

T & L Sales $15.2 M

S2 Corporation $13.0 M

Integrated Security Solutions $7.4 M

BDS Supply $5.4 M

CM Manufacturing $4.8 M

Liberty Electric Inc. $4.2 M

Black & Veatch Construction Inc. $3.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.3

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2

$0.1

FY12 FY14

$0.1 $0.1

FY13 FY15 FY16

$0.1

FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$362.3 MILLION 9,015

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Reserve Total

Cascade 3,242 870 980 68 5,160

Lewis and Clark ND 352 1,062 301 ND

Yellowstone 35 18 318 250 621

Missoula 32 23 181 156 392

Gallatin ND 12 202 ND ND

Flathead 0 ND 152 13 ND

Silver Bow 11 16 76 42 145

Park 0 0 85 0 85

Valley 0 46 36 0 82

Lincoln 0 51 22 0 73

70 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 MONTANA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Lincoln

Flathead Valley

Lewis and Clark Yellowstone

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Flathead

Lake

Lewis and Clark

Cascade

Missoula

Ravalli

Deer Lodge

Gallatin

Silver Bow

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Lake

Cascade

Gallatin

Deer Lodge

Flathead

Missoula

Lewis and Clark

Silver Bow

Ravalli

Fergus

(M = millions)

$147.8 M

$69.7 M

$22.5 M

$20.5 M

$14.7 M

$10.3 M

$4.5 M

$2.5 M

$2.0 M

$1.6 M

Cascade

Lewis and Clark

Yellowstone

Missoula

Gallatin

Silver Bow

Lincoln

Flathead

Valley

Park

$250.6 M

$59.7 M

$13.0 M

$9.3 M

$5.1 M

$4.9 M

$4.8 M

$4.4 M 

$4.2 M 

$1.0 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Missoula

Gallatin

Silver Bow

Cascade

Fergus

Park

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 71
NEBRASKA 

#43 

$1.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#43 

1.2% OF STATE GDP

0.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$832

PER RESIDENT 

#43 

$0.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#37 

16,501 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#34 

$0.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 3%

Development: 6%

Supplies and

Equipment: 16%

Service: 74%

By Service 

Army 

11% 

Navy/Marines 

2% 

Air Force 

79% 

Other Defense 

8% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 11% 

National 

Guard: 25% 

Active Duty: 38% 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Civilian: 26% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

36% 

Navy/Marines 

6% 

Air Force 

58% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Northrop Grumman $88.3 M

Cerberus Capital Management $78.7 M

Perspecta $77.6 M

General Dynamics $34.1 M

Sterling Computers $17.6 M

Strategic Professional Resources Inc. $16.9 M

Afognak Native Corp. $15.6 M

National Strategic Research Institute $15.0 M

Raytheon $14.7 M

Pro-Mark Services $13.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.9

FY12 FY13

$0.7

FY14 FY15

$0.7 $0.7 $0.7 $0.6 $0.6

$0.3

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$910.1 MILLION 16,501

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

County

Sarpy

Lancaster

Douglas

Saunders

Hall

Adams

Dodge

Platte

Madison

Gage

Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

6,040 2,615 79 663 9,397

39 486 2,033 211 2,769

95 904 355 532 1,886

0 33 563 0 596

16 36 260 0 312

0 18 182 73 273

ND ND 0 236 ND

0 ND 123 49 ND

ND ND 92 19 ND

0 ND 81 30 ND

72 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEBRASKA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Cedar

Platte

Saunders

Douglas

Buffalo Hall

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Thurston

Madison

Lancaster

Buffalo Hall

Kearney Gage

Johnson

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Sarpy

Lancaster

Douglas

Madison

Hall

Thurston

Kearney

Gage

Buffalo

Johnson

(M = millions)

$548.0 M

$52.4 M

$47.7 M 

$17.6 M

$5.3 M

$4.2 M 

$3.9 M

$3.1 M

$2.9 M

$2.9 M

Sarpy

Lancaster

Douglas

Saunders

Hall

Dodge

Adams

Cedar

Platte

Buffalo

$655.8 M

$100.3 M

$97.8 M

$14.6 M

$9.6 M

$6.8 M

$5.1 M

$4.1 M

$2.7 M 

$2.7 M 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Sarpy

Sarpy

Douglas

Lancaster

Dodge

Adams

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 73
NEVADA 

#37 

$3.0 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#31

1.7% OF STATE GDP

0.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$974

PER RESIDENT 

#36

$1.9 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#34 

22,020 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#31

$1.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 6% Development: 2%

Supplies and

Equipment: 24%

Service: 67%

By Service 

Army 

16% 

Navy/Marines 

9% 

Air Force 

Other Defense 

10% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 15% 

National 

Guard: 20% 

Civilian: 13% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

25% 

Navy/Marines 

9% 

Air Force 

Other Defense 

1% 

65% 

Active Duty: 52% 

65% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Sierra Nevada Corp. $689.2 M

JT4 $265.5 M

M1 Support Services $104.6 M

AECOM $95.6 M

Draken International Inc. $72.4 M

Day & Zimmermann Group $63.1 M

U.S. Ordnance $59.1 M

Korte Construction Co. (KCC) $49.7 M

Chugach Alaska Corp. $22.0 M

Record Steel and Construction Inc. $21.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.9 $1.8 $1.8

$1.5

FY12

$1.4 $1.4 $1.3

FY13

$1.3

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$1.1 BILLION 22,020

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Reserve Total

Clark 10,393 1,867 2,011 3,186 17,457

Washoe 54 356 1,843 145 2,398

Churchill 935 298 87 40 1,360

Carson City ND 194 481 0 ND

Mineral ND 48 0 0 ND

Elko 0 ND 27 0 ND

Storey ND 0 0 0 ND

Douglas 0 ND 0 0 ND

Pershing ND 0 0 0 ND

Lincoln 0 ND 0 0 ND

74 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEVADA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Churchill

Storey

Nye

Mineral

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Elko

Washoe

Churchill

Lyon

Storey

Carson City

Nye

Douglas Mineral

Clark

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Clark

Washoe

Churchill

Mineral

Storey

Carson City

Douglas

Lyon

Elko

Nye

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$834.3 M

$782.7 M

$115.9 M

$69.1 M

$27.2 M 

$12.7 M

$12.3 M

$3.3 M 

$1.6 M

 $321.4 K

Clark

Churchill

Washoe

Carson City

Mineral

Storey

Douglas

Elko

Pershing

Nye

$934.4 M

$90.6 M

$75.1 M

$32.0 M

$3.5 M

$732.8 K 

$299.6 K

$290.3 K

$113.5 K

$77.4 K 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Clark

Elko

Washoe

Douglas

Carson City

Pershing

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 75 
NEW HAMPSHIRE 

#36

$3.1 B SPENT IN 

#14

3.5% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,268

PER RESIDENT 

#32 

$2.8 B CONTRACT 

#50

6,337 NUMBER OF 

#50

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Service: 12%

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 11%

Supplies and

Equipment: 76%

By Service 

Army 

19% 

Navy/Marines 

36% 

Air Force 

24% 

Other Defense 

21% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 23% Active Duty: 17% 

Civilian: 17% 

National 

Guard: 43% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

50% 

Navy/Marines 

22% 

Air Force 

25% 

Other Defense 

3% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

BAE Systems $1.6 B

Harris Corp. $181.4 M

L3 Technologies $134.6 M

Sig Sauer Inc. $89.9 M

Red River Computer Company $78.8 M

Safran Optics 1 $68.9 M

Elbit Systems $67.1 M

Raytheon $54.4 M

Creare $39.7 M

Wilcox Industries Corp. $32.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.8

$2.2

$1.7 $1.6 $1.4

FY12 FY13

$1.2 $1.1 $1.0

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$254.5 MILLION 6,337

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Rockingham 329 435 1,118

Merrimack ND 201 635

Hillsborough 60 182 568

Grafton ND 241 244

Strafford 11 16 141

Cheshire ND ND 0

Belknap 0 ND 0

Reserve Total

1,133 3,015

ND ND

ND ND

0 ND

294 462

51 ND

0 ND

76 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NEW HAMPSHIRE FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Coos

Grafton

Carroll

Belknap

Sullivan Merrimack

Strafford

Rockingham

Hillsborough

Cheshire

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

Hillsborough

Rockingham

Grafton

Sullivan

Belknap

Strafford

Cheshire

Merrimack

Coos

Carroll

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$2.0 B

$611.7 M

$108.8 M

$80.8 M

$19.6 M

$19.5 M

$17.9 M

$5.7 M

 $761.1 K

 $145.3 K

Rockingham

Merrimack

Hillsborough

Grafton

Strafford

Cheshire

Belknap

$105.4 M

$39.4 M

$31.0 M

$21.5 M

$8.1 M

$1.6 M

$329.4 K

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Grafton

Belknap

Merrimack

Strafford

Hillsborough

Cheshire Rockingham

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 77
NEW JERSEY 

#19

$9.0 B SPENT IN 

#37 

1.4% OF STATE GDP

1.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,012

PER RESIDENT 

#17

$7.1 B CONTRACT 

#24 

34,261 NUMBER OF 

#22 

$1.9 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Service: 18%

Construction: 2% Research and

Development: 10%

Supplies and

Equipment: 69%

By Service 

Army 

21% 

Navy/Marines 

31% 

Air Force 

20% 

Other Defense 

28% 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 19% Reserve: 26% 

National Civilian: 31% 

Guard: 25% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

47% 

Navy/Marines 

17% 

Air Force 

34% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Lockheed Martin $1.6 B

Harris Corp. $761.4 M

BAE Systems $604.6 M

SAIC $594.2 M

TransDigm Group $170.6 M

Arctic Slope Regional Corp. $143.7 M

Huber+Suhner AG $141.2 M

Total S.A. $117.3 M

Donjon Marine Co. Inc. $80.5 M

Bethel Industries Inc. $78.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$7.1

$5.5 $5.3 $5.6 $4.8

FY12

$4.6

FY13 FY16

$4.5 $4.1

FY14 FY15 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$1.9 BILLION 34,261

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Burlington 5,434 2,741 1,756

Morris 136 4,222 643

Ocean 275 2,252 643

Monmouth 281 329 689

Atlantic ND 358 1,337

Camden 42 70 358

Bergen 63 27 393

Hudson 12 98 332

Essex ND 31 474

Mercer 15 80 221

Reserve Total

7,108 17,039

324 5,325

17 3,187

483 1,782

78 ND

295 765

120 603

157 599

0 ND

183 499

78 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NEW JERSEY FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Bergen

Morris

Hudson

Burlington

Ocean

Atlantic

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Passaic

Bergen

Morris

Somerset Essex

Monmouth

Camden

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Burlington

Passaic

Morris

Essex

Camden

Somerset

Monmouth

Mercer

Bergen

Middlesex

(M = millions)

$2.2 B 

$1.3 B

$930.2 M

$678.5 M

$324.5 M

$270.6 M

$263.7 M

$197.9 M

$152.5 M

$137.6 M

Burlington

Morris

Ocean

Monmouth

Atlantic

Camden

Hudson

Essex

Bergen

Mercer

$835.8 M

$506.2M

$254.6 M

$77.3 M 

$58.9 M

$26.0 M

$22.6 M

$21.6 M

$19.4 M

$19.4 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Essex

Mercer

Camden

Mercer

Monmouth

Burlington

Middlesex

Atlantic

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 79 
NEW MEXICO 

#27 

$6.1 B SPENT IN 

#9

5.7% OF STATE GDP

1.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,912

PER RESIDENT 

#23 

$4.7 B CONTRACT 

#31

24,292 NUMBER OF 

#28

$1.4 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Equipment: 9%

Construction: 18%

Research and Service: 65%

Development: 8%

By Service 

Army 

68% 

Navy/Marines 

5% 

Air Force 

18% 

Other Defense 

9% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 5% National 

Guard:16%

Active Duty: 52% 

Civilian: 27% 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

26% 

Navy/Marines 

2% 

Air Force 

70% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Honeywell $2.6 B

SLSCO $738.8 M

TRIAD National Security LLC $159.5 M

Applied Research Associates $115.6 M

Trax International $67.6 M

Federal Contracting Inc. $53.0 M

AECOM $50.2 M

M1 Support Services $44.1 M

MZA Associates Corp. $40.9 M

PAE-Perini $40.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.7

$2.6 $2.3

FY12

$2.1 $2.2 $2.0

FY16 FY17

$2.1

$1.5

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$1.4 BILLION 24,292

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

County

Bernalillo

Curry

Otero

Dona Ana

Santa Fe

Sandoval

Chaves

Valencia

San Juan

Rio Arriba

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

3,525 3,141 1,185

4,633 512 41

4,077 916 70

331 1,646 482

ND 243 535

0 30 872

ND 12 166

0 ND 169

0 ND 118

0 14 63

Reserve

769

34

85

159

183

0

0

0

0

0

Total

8,620

5,220

5,148

2,618

ND

902

ND

ND

ND

77

80 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NEW MEXICO FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

San Juan

Sandoval

Curry

Socorro

Chaves

Otero

Dona Ana

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Taos

Sandoval Santa Fe

Los Alamos

Bernalillo

Curry

Socorro

Chaves

Otero

Dona Ana

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Bernalillo

Dona Ana

Otero

Curry

Sandoval

Santa Fe

Los Alamos

Socorro

Taos

Chaves

(M = millions)

$3.3 B 

$989.1 M

$194.2 M

$90.2 M

$44.6 M

$30.4 M

$23.2 M 

$8.8 M

$2.5 M

$1.2 M

Bernalillo

Curry

Otero

Dona Ana

Santa Fe

Sandoval

Chaves

Socorro

San Juan

Valencia

$540.9 M

$300.5 M

$287.5 M

$166.5 M

$41.4 M

$17.6 M

$4.2 M 

$2.4 M 

$2.3 M 

$2.2 M 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Bernalillo

Santa Fe

Valencia

Valencia

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 81 
NEW YORK 

#16

$11.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#51

0.6% OF STATE GDP

2.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$597

PER RESIDENT 

#14

$8.9 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#14

59,523 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#17

$2.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 2% Development: 7%

Supplies and

Equipment: 76%

By Service 

Army 

24% 

Navy/Marines 

Air Force 

12% 

Other Defense 

18% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 22% 

National 

Guard: 26% 

Civilian: 20% 

Service: 15%

46% 

Active Duty: 32% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

72% 

Navy/Marines 

9% 

Air Force 

16% 

Other Defense 

3% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Lockheed Martin $1.4 B

Harris Corp. $1.1 B

Triumph Group Inc. $828.3 M

Northrop Grumman $333.4 M

Moog $298.3 M

BAE Systems $289.3 M

Griffon Corp. $206.7 M

SRC $155.8 M

Interpublic Group of Companies $141.2 M

Assured Information Security $137.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$8.9

$7.3 $7.4

FY12

$6.4 $6.6 $6.2 $6.4

FY13 FY14 FY15

$6.0

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$2.7 BILLION 59,523

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Jefferson 15,126 2,173 160

Orange 1,779 2,499 1,544

Niagara 15 582 761

Onondaga 206 500 1,478

Oneida 67 1,814 600

Queens 85 105 600

Albany 250 1,337 903

Schenectady 25 275 1,513

Nassau 398 285 418

Kings 212 333 562

Reserve

208

792

1,595

736

275

1,962

15

676

1,177

1,128

Total

17,667

6,614

2,953

2,920

2,756

2,752

2,505

2,489

2,278

2,235

82 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEW YORK 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Schenectady

Albany

Jefferson

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Orange

Nassau

New York

Suffolk

Kings

Oneida

Monroe

Onondaga

Erie

Tioga

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Nassau

Suffolk

Monroe

Onondaga

Erie

Tioga

New York

Oneida

Orange

Kings

(M = millions)

$1.5 B

$1.5 B

$1.1 B

$916.8 M

$711.5 M

$711.3 M

$599.5 M

$399.6 M

$183.7 M

$132.7 M

Jefferson

Orange

Oneida

Albany

Onondaga

Niagara

Schenectady

Nassau

New York

Suffolk

$928.3 M

$415.4 M

$157.1 M

$154.4 M

$113.6 M

$92.1 M

$91.5 M

$83.9 M

$79.3 M

$77.6 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Onondaga

Oneida

Orange

Nassau

New York

Suffolk

Niagara

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 83 
NORTH CAROLINA 

#15

$12.3 B SPENT IN 

#29

2.0% OF STATE GDP

2.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,171

PER RESIDENT 

#22 

$5.2 B CONTRACT 

#4 

144,423 NUMBER 

#6

$7.1 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 10%

Supplies and

Equipment: 34%

Research and

Development: 4%

Service: 53%

By Service 

Army 

29% 

Navy/Marines 

39% 

Air Force 

5% 

Other Defense 

27% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 7%

National Guard: 8% 

Civilian: 16% 

Active Duty: 70% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

50% 

Navy/Marines 

41% 

Air Force 

8% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Environmental Chemical Corp. $546.3 M

Quantico Tactical $315.5 M

BWX Technologies $232.1 M

General Dynamics $124.3 M

Sodexo $105.9 M

ACC Construction $97.1 M

KDH Defense Systems Inc. $91.8 M

APTIM Federal Services $80.4 M

Sauer $71.8 M

CACI $70.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$5.2

$4.0 $3.7 $3.3 $3.5

FY12

$2.8

FY13

$2.5 $2.6

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$7.1 BILLION 144,423

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Cumberland 46,469 10,628 607 2,237 59,941

Onslow 40,394 3,801 57 487 44,739

Craven 6,366 4,962 134 24 11,486

Wayne 4,612 758 299 1,585 7,254

Wake 614 715 1,206 2,258 4,793

Mecklenburg 188 445 1,622 1,011 3,266

Guilford 41 126 463 824 1,454

New Hanover ND 328 145 341 ND

Caldwell 422 26 115 0 563

Pitt 42 17 228 244 531

84 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NORTH CAROLINA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Durham

Wake

Onslow

New Hanover

Brunswick

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Rockingham

Guilford

Wayne

Harnett

Cumberland Hoke

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Cumberland

Onslow

Mecklenburg

Craven

Hoke

Guilford

Wake

Rockingham

Harnett

Wayne

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.4 B

$1.3 B

$372.3 M 

$325.6 M

$319.1 M

$234.1 M

$185.4 M

$152.2 M

$96.9 M

$82.0 M

Cumberland

Onslow

Craven

Wayne

Wake

Mecklenburg

Guilford

New Hanover

Durham

Brunswick

$3.9 B

$1.5 B

$591.9 M

$338.6 M

$174.8 M

$104.6 M

$37.9 M

$35.9 M

$26.1 M

$18.7 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Guilford

Wake

Wayne

Cumberland

Onslow

Craven

Craven Mecklenburg

MecklenburMecklenburg

MecklenburMecklenburg

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 85 
NORTH DAKOTA 

#45

$0.8 B SPENT IN 

#34 

1.4% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,070

PER RESIDENT 

#51

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

#39

13,543 NUMBER OF 

#39

$0.6 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 9%

Supplies and Research and

Equipment: 24% Development: 2%

Service: 66%

By Service 

Army 

25% 

Navy/Marines 

6% 

Air Force 

55% 

Other Defense 

14% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 2% 

National 

Guard: 30% 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Active Duty: 54% 

Civilian: 13% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

27% 

Navy/Marines 

1% 

Air Force 

72% 

Other Defense 

0% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Federal Contracting Inc. $23.5 M

Earthmovers Inc. $21.5 M

United Technologies $15.6 M

T F Powers Construction Co. $13.5 M

Dakco Distributors $10.1 M

Summit Technical Solutions $8.6 M

General Atomic Technologies $7.7 M

Pro-Mark Services $6.8 M

Nodak Electric Cooperative Inc. $4.6 M

Killdeer Mountain Manufacturing Inc. $3.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.4

FY12

$0.3

FY13 FY14

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.1

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

$626.2 MILLION 13,543

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

County

Ward

Grand Forks

Cass

Burleigh

Ramsey

Richland

Barnes

Stutsman

Stark

LaMoure

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

5,625 692 281

1,637 369 330

21 314 1,576

ND 270 953

0 54 328

ND 0 152

0 18 88

0 ND 103

0 ND 75

0 ND 63

Reserve

19

51

162

44

0

62

0

0

0

0

Total

6,617

2,387

2,073

ND

382

ND

106

ND

ND

ND

86 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NORTH DAKOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Ramsey

McLean

Burleigh Barnes Cass

Richland

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Pembina

Ward Benson Grand Forks

Dunn

Burleigh Stutsman Cass

Stark

LaMoure

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Ward

Grand Forks

Stutsman

Pembina

LaMoure

Cass

Burleigh

Stark

Dunn

Benson

(M = millions)

$70.6 M

$65.3 M

$15.6 M

$13.6 M

$7.7 M 

$5.2 M

$2.5 M

$2.0 M

$1.8 M

$1.3 M

Ward

Grand Forks

Cass

Burleigh

Ramsey

McLean

Barnes

Richland

Pembina

Stutsman

$366.4 M

$119.8 M

$61.5 M

$48.5 M

$11.1 M

$4.8 M

$3.1 M

$2.7 M 

$2.5 M

$1.6 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Ward Grand Forks

Pembina

Stutsman

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 87
 

OHIO 

#18 #32 1.8% $858 #19 #11 #12

$10.0 B SPENT IN 1.4% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $6.7 B CONTRACT 61,989 NUMBER OF $3.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 2% Research and

Development: 16%

Supplies and Service: 29% Equipment: 52%

By Service 

Army 

14% 

Navy/Marines 

14% 

Air Force 

49% 

Other Defense 

23% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 18% Active Duty: 11%

Civilian: 44% National 

Guard: 27% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

31% 

Navy/Marines

5% 

Air Force 

48% 

Other Defense 

16% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

General Electric $1.1 B

CFM International $376.7 M

Battelle Memorial Institute $194.3 M

L3 Technologies $192.6 M

Wornick $171.0 M

Riverside Research Institute $170.1 M

Boeing $163.3 M

University of Dayton $153.6 M

Excelitas Technologies Holdings $133.3 M

Alion Science and Technology $105.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$6.7 $6.2 $5.4

FY12

$4.8 $4.9 $4.4

FY13 FY14

$3.8 $4.0

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$3.3 BILLION 61,989

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Greene

Franklin

Cuyahoga

Hamilton

Clark

Trumbull

Richland

Stark

Summit

Fulton

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

5,421 14,486 86

345 7,089 3,779

189 2,771 407

123 277 732

ND 382 1,645

32 63 353

ND 290 1,551

33 25 848

ND 172 618

ND 0 1,049

Reserve

2,516

3,001

243

962

0

1,573

0

850

838

0

Total

22,509

14,214

3,610

2,094

ND

2,021

ND

1,756

ND

ND

88 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 OHIO 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Lucas

Cuyahoga

Trumbull

Richland

Stark

Franklin

Hamilton

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Cuyahoga

Franklin Licking

Greene

Warren

Butler

Hamilton

Clermont

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Greene

Hamilton

Montgomery

Butler

Franklin

Cuyahoga

Licking

Clermont

Summit

Warren

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.8 B

$1.3 B

$970.1 M

$494.0 M

$488.6 M

$217.4 M

$194.4 M

$185.7 M

$134.8 M

$91.2 M

Greene

Franklin

Cuyahoga

Hamilton

Clark

Richland

Trumbull

Summit

Lucas

Stark

$1.8 B

$719.8 M

$204.5 M

$73.5 M

$59.5 M

$45.0 M

$44.9 M

$40.7 M

$33.3 M 

$33.1 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Greene

Montgomery

Summit

Summit

Clark

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 89
OKLAHOMA 

#23 

$6.7 B SPENT IN 

#15

3.3% OF STATE GDP

1.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,698

PER RESIDENT 

#29

$3.6 B CONTRACT 

#13

61,073 NUMBER OF 

#13

$3.1 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 9%

Supplies and

Equipment: 18%

Service: 71%

By Service 

Army 

12% 

Navy/Marines 

9% 

Air Force 

Other Defense 

10% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 8% National 

Guard: 14%

Civilian: 42% 

Allocations, By Service 

Research and

Development: 3%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Boeing $1.2 B

Patriot Team $331.6 M

Korte Construction Co. (KCC) $137.5 M

L3 Technologies $125.4 M

Acorn Growth Equity Capital $120.7 M

IAP Worldwide Services $102.3 M

Harper Construction Company $62.6 M

Arctic Slope Regional Corp. $61.0 M

Afognak Native Corp. $57.3 M

Bering Straits Native Corporation $44.3 M

69% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Active Duty: 37% 

Army 

45% 

Navy/Marines 

5% 

Air Force 

48% 

Other Defense 

3% 

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$3.5 $3.6

$3.0 $3.1

$2.3 $2.2

$1.8

FY12

$1.4

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

$3.1 BILLION 61,073

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Oklahoma

Comanche

Tulsa

Jackson

Pittsburg

Garfield

Cleveland

Canadian

Wagoner

Muskogee

Active Civilian National

Duty

6,286

13,244

54

1,350

ND

1,349

33

ND

15

0

Guard

17,998 2,197

2,504 387

900 1,807

1,272 76

1,883 163

315 169

172 1,011

25 610

20 435

83 375

Reserve Total

2,156 28,637

482 16,617

293 3,054

64 2,762

14 ND

87 1,920

82 1,298

483 ND

479 949

43 501

90 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

OKLAHOMA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Tulsa

Wagoner

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Delaware

Garfield

Payne Tulsa

Oklahoma

Seminole

Cleveland Pittsburg

Jackson Comanche

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Oklahoma

Tulsa

Comanche

Garfield

Jackson

Cleveland

Payne

Pittsburg

Delaware

Seminole

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.1 B

$622.4 M

$292.9 M

$116.1 M

$88.5 M

$37.9 M

$36.3 M

$36.0 M

$35.2 M

$27.6 M

Oklahoma

Comanche

Jackson

Pittsburg

Garfield

Tulsa

Cleveland

Canadian

Wagoner

Muskogee

$1.8 B

$674.6 M

$156.1 M

$126.4 M

$110.0 M

$104.8 M

$31.0 M

$20.7 M

$17.3 M

$11.4 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Pittsburg

Garfield

Cleveland

Jackson Comanche

Canadian Oklahoma

Muskogee

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 91
OREGON 

#40

$1.7 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#50

0.7% OF STATE GDP

0.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$401

PER RESIDENT 

#41

$1.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#40

13,052 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#42 

$0.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0%

Supplies and

Equipment: 71%

By Service 

Army 

12% 

Navy/Marines 

23% 

Air Force 

6% 

Other Defense 

Research and 

Development: 5%

Service: 23%

60% 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 4% Reserve: 12% 

Civilian: 24% 

National 

Guard: 60% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

66% 

Navy/Marines 

9% 

Air Force 

25% 

Other Defense 

0% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Vigor Industrial $614.3 M

FLIR Systems $84.2 M

EPIC Aviation $74.1 M

Galois $39.4 M

Bay West $30.0 M

Boeing $28.9 M

Saltchuk $27.4 M

Precision Integrated Programs $17.9 M

Meggitt $16.0 M

Rockwell Collins-ESA Vision Systems $15.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.2

$0.9

FY12

$0.7 $0.6 $0.6 $0.6 $0.5 $0.5

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$497.2 MILLION 13,052

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Multnomah

Marion

Klamath

Clackamas

Lane

Umatilla

Jackson

Clatsop

Washington

Deschutes

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

273 1,545 2,012

ND 293 1,267

110 323 1,006

31 177 597

48 141 397

0 175 349

ND 40 372

0 62 253

ND 15 225

ND 35 175

Reserve

754

0

0

415

345

0

0

0

0

0

Total

4,584

ND

1,439

1,220

931

524

ND

315

ND

ND

92 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 OREGON 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Clatsop

Umatilla

Sherman

Wasco

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Umatilla

Multnomah

Wasco

Clackamas

Linn

Deschutes

Klamath

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Clackamas

Multnomah

Marion

Washington

Umatilla

Wasco

Yamhill

Klamath

Linn

Deschutes

(M = millions)

$622.0 M

$242.6 M

$89.6 M

$61.3 M

$33.3 M 

$29.7 M

$29.5 M

$15.4 M

$10.9 M

$10.8 M

Multnomah

Marion

Klamath

Clackamas

Lane

Umatilla

Wasco

Sherman

Jackson

Clatsop

$221.7 M

$58.8 M

$56.2 M

$36.2 M

$26.2 M

$20.6 M

$13.2 M

$10.2 M

$9.0 M

$8.4 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Washington

Yamhill

Marion

Multnomah Clackamas

Marion

Lane

Jackson Klamath

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 93
PENNSYLVANIA 

#7 

$18.1 B SPENT IN 

#24 

2.2% OF STATE GDP

3.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,415

PER RESIDENT 

#7 

$15.3 B CONTRACT 

#16

58,106 NUMBER OF 

#15

$2.8 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and 

Construction: 1% Development: 6%

Service: 18%

Supplies and

Equipment: 75%

By Service 

Army 

20% 

Navy/Marines 

41% 

Air Force 

7% 

Other Defense 

31% 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 4% 

Reserve: 19% 

Civilian: 46% 

National 

Guard: 32% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

54% 

Navy/Marines 

19% 

Air Force 

12% 

Other Defense 

15% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

AmerisourceBergen $2.4 B

Fluor Corp. $1.6 B

Bechtel Group $1.4 B

Boeing $1.3 B

BAE Systems $1.0 B

Highmark Inc. $400.3 M

Lockheed Martin $382.7 M

Leonardo SpA $330.6 M

Kongsberg Gruppen $315.5 M

Pennsylvania State University $248.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$15.3

$12.8 $11.7 $11.0

FY12

$10.4 $9.7 $9.9 $9.7

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$2.8 BILLION 58,106

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Philadelphia 401 8,463 1,398

Allegheny 340 1,448 1,441

Cumberland 645 4,066 223

Lebanon ND 954 3,753

York 289 3,278 74

Monroe 29 3,128 115

Montgomery 57 365 1,652

Franklin ND 2,117 151

Dauphin 55 364 1,913

Cambria 18 199 841

Reserve Total

100 10,362

2,881 6,110

401 5,335

187 ND

399 4,040

106 3,378

653 2,727

344 ND

193 2,525

463 1,521

94 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

PENNSYLVANIA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Monroe

Lebanon

Adams

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Cambria

Allegheny

Bucks

Montgomery

Cumberland

Franklin York Philadelphia

Delaware

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Allegheny

Chester

Delaware

York

Bucks

Philadelphia

Cambria

Montgomery

Franklin

Cumberland

(M = millions)

$3.3 B 

$2.6 B

$1.5 B

$1.5 B

$822.0 M

$812.0 M

$634.9 M

$607.1 M

$561.8 M

$463.4 M

Philadelphia

Cumberland

York

Allegheny

Monroe

Lebanon

Franklin

Montgomery

Dauphin

Adams

$799.3 M

$408.0 M

$276.4 M

$235.9 M

$215.3 M

$175.0 M

$165.3 M

$83.9 M

$75.3 M

$40.2 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Franklin York

Montgomery

Philadelphia

Allegheny

Cumberland

Dauphin

Chester

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 95
RHODE ISLAND 

#44 

$1.5 B SPENT IN 

#22 

2.4% OF STATE GDP

0.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,394

PER RESIDENT 

#44 

$0.7 B CONTRACT 

#42 

12,737 NUMBER OF 

#35

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 5% Research and

Development: 7%

Supplies and

Equipment: 31%

Service: 58%

By Service 

Army 

2% 

Navy/Marines 

88% 

Air Force 

1% 

Other Defense 

8% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 9% 

Active Duty: 25% 

National 

Guard: 24% 

Civilian: 41% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

23% 

Navy/Marines 

65% 

Air Force 

10% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors 

Raytheon

Systems Engineering Associates

McLaughlin Research Corp.

Asturian Group

Northrop Grumman

Mikel Inc.

Brantner and Associates Inc.

Hyman Brickle & Son Inc.

Rite-Solutions

SAIC

(M = millions)

$109.1 M

$59.5 M

$46.4 M

$28.2 M

$25.5 M

$21.4 M

$19.8 M

$19.0 M

$18.2 M

$17.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.8

$0.6 $0.7 $0.7

FY12 FY14

$0.6 $0.6

FY13 FY15 FY16

$0.5 $0.5

FY17 FY18 FY19

$824.3 MILLION 12,737

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Newport 2,616 4,677 116 937 8,346

Washington ND 292 1,210 45 ND

Kent 33 68 1,064 ND ND

Providence 108 197 502 217 1,024

Bristol ND ND 201 0 ND

96 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
97

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Newport

Washington

RHODE ISLAND FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2019

Newport

Providence

Washington

Kent

Bristol

(M = millions)

$538.1 M

$47.9 M

$45.3 M

$16.2 M

$4.9 M

Newport

Washington

Providence

Kent

Bristol

$681.4 M

$54.2 M

$44.9 M

$30.4 M

$3.3 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Newport

Washington

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
SOUTH CAROLINA 

#28

$5.9 B SPENT IN 

#23 

2.3% OF STATE GDP

1.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,147

PER RESIDENT 

#31

$3.2 B CONTRACT 

#10

68,381 NUMBER OF 

#16

$2.7 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 8% Research and

Development: 3% Supplies and

Equipment: 28%

Service: 61%

By Service 

Army 

22% 

Navy/Marines 

45% 

Air Force 

20% 

Other Defense 

13% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 10% 

National 

Guard: 16% 

Active Duty: 58% 

Civilian: 16% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

43% 

Navy/Marines 

35% 

Air Force 

21% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors 

Cerberus Capital Management

UNAKA Corp.

Detyens Shipyards

Norfolk Dredging Company

KBR

FN America

SAIC

Scientific Research Corp.

AECOM

US Foods Holding

FY15 FY16 FY17

$2.7 BILLION 68,381

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Richland

Charleston

Beaufort

Berkeley

Sumter

Greenville

Spartanburg

Orangeburg

York

Florence

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

11,653 3,381 3,191

3,903 4,873 809

10,606 1,250 101

6,831 316 144

5,640 771 139

58 245 686

ND 11 324

ND 24 210

ND 19 279

30 ND 237

(M = millions)

$206.7 M

$156.4 M

$153.8 M

$124.5 M

$121.0 M

$95.5 M

$85.0 M

$69.2 M

$52.0 M

$46.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$3.3 $3.2 $3.3 $3.2

FY12 FY13

$2.9

FY14

$2.6 $2.6 $2.5

FY18 FY19

Reserve Total

2,056 20,281

3,079 12,664

51 12,008

ND ND

158 6,708

908 1,897

173 ND

263 ND

197 ND

125 ND

98 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

SOUTH CAROLINA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Spartanburg

Lexington

Berkeley

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Greenville

Horry

Richland Marion

Sumter

Berkeley

Dorchester

Charleston

Beaufort

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Charleston

Sumter

Berkeley

Richland

Beaufort

Marion

Greenville

Lexington

Dorchester

Horry

(M = millions)

$1.3 B

$481.5 M

$410.1 M

$303.8 M

$165.4 M

$156.4 M

$119.8 M

$93.9 M

$34.9 M

$24.0 M

Charleston

Richland

Sumter

Berkeley

Beaufort

Greenville

Anderson

Lexington

Spartanburg

Aiken

$733.0 M

$667.7 M

$417.8 M

$380.6 M

$318.2 M

$52.8 M

$10.7 M

$10.2 M

$9.7 M

$9.6 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Lexington

Greenville

Richland

Anderson

Charleston

Beaufort

Aiken

Sumter

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 99
SOUTH DAKOTA 

#49

$0.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#45

1.1% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$695

PER RESIDENT 

#49

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#47 

9,560 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#45

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 0% Development: 4%

Service: 22%

Supplies and

Equipment: 74%

By Service 

Army 

9% 

Navy/Marines 

16% 

Air Force 

50% 

Other Defense 

25% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 5% 

Active Duty: 36% 

National 

Guard: 44% 

Civilian: 15% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

43% 

Navy/Marines 

1% 

Air Force 

56% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Sterling Computers $123.0 M

Rosenbauer Beteiligungsverwaltung $19.1 M

National Presto Industries $15.6 M

Black Hills Ammunition Inc. $7.1 M

Forest Products Distributors $7.1 M

Raven Industries Inc. $5.4 M

Leidos $4.0 M

Oneida Nation $3.4 M

BH Services Inc. $3.3 M

VRC Metal Systems $2.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.4

FY12

$0.3

$0.3

FY13 FY14

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.1

$0.1

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$376.9 MILLION 9,560

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Meade 3,339 12 113

Minnehaha 21 364 1,518

Pennington ND 829 722

Brown 0 ND 169

Codington 0 ND 269

Hughes ND 48 163

Beadle 0 0 182

Charles Mix 0 39 116

Davison 0 47 108

Lake 0 0 132

Reserve Total

21 3,485

313 2,216

0 ND

102 ND

0 ND

0 ND

0 182

0 155

0 155

0 132

100 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

SOUTH DAKOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Codington

Davison

Charles Mix

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Brown

Meade

Deuel

Hughes

Pennington Brookings 

Lincoln

Yankton

Union

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Union

Meade

Minnehaha

Pennington

Deuel

Hughes

Lincoln

Brookings

Yankton

Brown

(M = millions)

$125.3 M

$33.8 M

$29.4 M

$27.0 M

$15.7 M

$1.9 M

$1.4 M

 $881.9 K

 $833.4 K

 $591.3 K

Meade

Pennington

Minnehaha

Hughes

Codington

Brown

Charles Mix

Lincoln

Yankton

Davison

$186.0 M

$73.9 M

$62.6 M

$7.8 M

$5.8 M

$4.7 M 

$4.5 M

$4.2 M 

$4.1 M

$3.6 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Meade

Pennington

Brown

Hughes

Yankton

Lincoln

Minnehaha

Minnehaha

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 101
TENNESSEE 

#31

$5.1 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#38

1.3% OF STATE GDP

0.9%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$745

PER RESIDENT 

#26

$4.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#28

26,938 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#33 

$1.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 4%

Supplies and Research and Equipment: 16%

Development: 1%

Service: 79%

By Service 

Army 

63% 

Navy/Marines 

9% 

Air Force 

18% 

Other Defense 

9% 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 8%

Reserve: 20% 

Civilian: 24% 

National 

Guard: 48% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

62% 

Navy/Marines 

19% 

Air Force 

18% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Consolidated Nuclear Security $2.1 B

FedEx $490.8 M

BAE Systems $411.4 M

Bechtel Group $242.2 M

Integration Innovation Inc. $43.9 M

L3 Technologies $42.4 M

AECOM $39.5 M

Tevet $28.3 M

ECI Defense Group $24.9 M

Cummins $22.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.0

$2.0 $1.7 $1.5 $1.4

FY16 FY17

$1.6

FY12

$1.2 $1.3

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$1.1 BILLION 26,938

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Reserve Total

Shelby 1,431 2,458 1,370 1,492 6,751

Davidson 416 1,142 2,451 1,355 5,364

Blount 24 81 1,618 ND ND

Knox 89 415 201 802 1,507

Rutherford 36 117 886 460 1,499

Hamilton 50 86 433 807 1,376

Montgomery 47 1,116 73 ND ND

Coffee 54 410 251 ND ND

Washington 44 34 78 281 437

Gibson 0 36 372 0 408

102 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TENNESSEE 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Gibson Knox

Rutherford

Blount Coffee

Shelby Hamilton

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Montgomery Sullivan

Greene

Davidson

Anderson

Knox

Hickman

Coffee

Shelby Franklin

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Anderson

Shelby

Sullivan

Coffee

Montgomery

Davidson

Franklin

Hickman

Greene

Knox

(M = millions)

$2.1 B

$648.2 M

$432.4 M 

$345.2 M

$93.8 M

$74.2 M 

$48.8 M

$41.9 M

$39.2 M

$38.4 M

Shelby

Davidson

Montgomery

Blount

Knox

Coffee

Rutherford

Hamilton

Madison

Gibson

$373.1 M

$225.8 M

$77.7 M 

$52.8 M

$51.5M

$42.3 M 

$36.3 M

$30.0 M

$11.7 M

$10.2 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Montgomery

Davidson

Madison

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 103
 

TEXAS 

#3 

$54.8 B SPENT IN 

#16

2.9% OF STATE GDP

9.9%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,889

PER RESIDENT 

#2 

$43.4 B CONTRACT 

#3 

224,531 NUMBER 

#3 

$11.4 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 4% Development: 4%

Construction: 21%

Supplies and

Equipment: 70%

By Service 

Army 

25% 

Navy/Marines 

36% 

Air Force 

21% 

Other Defense 

18% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 15% 

National Active Duty: 54% 

Guard: 10% 

Civilian: 22% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

60% 

Navy/Marines 

8% 

Air Force 

29% 

Other Defense 

2% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Lockheed Martin $22.5 B

L3 Technologies $2.0 B

Bell Boeing Joint Project Office $1.6 B

Raytheon $1.3 B

Textron $998.1 M

Royal Dutch Shell $627.9 M

General Dynamics $617.2 M

Cerberus Capital Management $533.6 M

Elbit Systems $434.8 M

Airbus $349.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$43.4 $38.9 $39.4

$32.1 $29.2

FY12 FY13

$28.5

FY14 FY15

$24.9 $23.4

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$11.4 BILLION 224,531

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Bexar 36,612 22,606 3,085 9,189 71,492

Bell 33,816 5,348 720 867 40,751

El Paso 26,172 4,022 1,180 1,901 33,275

Tarrant 1,165 2,715 1,627 6,484 11,991

Harris 671 723 3,098 3,994 8,486

Wichita 6,075 1,129 104 150 7,458

Dallas 531 911 1,649 3,997 7,088

Nueces 1,400 3,764 186 513 5,863

Taylor 4,516 496 193 347 5,552

Travis 345 869 2,555 1,088 4,857

104 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 TEXAS 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Wichita

Dallas

Bell

Harris

Bexar

Nueces

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Potter

Hunt

Collin

Tarrant

Dallas

El Paso

Bell

Harris

Bexar

Hidalgo

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Tarrant

Dallas

Bexar

Harris

Collin

Potter

Hunt

El Paso

Hidalgo

Bell

(M = millions, B = billions)

$17.6 B

$9.3 B

$3.9 B

$2.3 B 

$1.6 B

$1.6 B

$1.5 B

$812.6 M

$629.8 M

$568.0 M

Bexar

Bell

El Paso

Tarrant

Nueces

Taylor

Harris

Wichita

Dallas

Travis

$4.1 B

$2.2 B 

$1.8 B

$471.8 M

$371.5 M

$296.2 M

$267.8 M

$258.5 M

$256.5 M

$222.1 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Tarrant El Paso

Taylor

Travis

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 105
UTAH 

#29

$5.7 B SPENT IN 

#17

2.9% OF STATE GDP

1.0%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,776

PER RESIDENT 

#28

$3.9 B CONTRACT 

#25

32,769 NUMBER OF 

#23 

$1.8 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 2%

Service: 25%

Development: 7%

Supplies and

Equipment: 65%

By Service 

Army 

17% 

Navy/Marines 

47% 

Air Force 

30% 

Other Defense 

6% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 15% Active Duty: 14% 

National 

Guard: 22% 

Civilian: 49% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

33% 

Navy/Marines 

3% 

Air Force 

61% 

Other Defense 

4% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Northrop Grumman $1.6 B

L3 Technologies $460.6 M

Boeing $201.9 M

Moog $180.2 M

Utah State University $120.4 M

Triumph Group Inc. $110.4 M

Harris Corp. $90.5 M

HHI Corporation $70.3 M

Jacobs Engineering Group $33.6 M

Pelatron Technologies $29.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$3.9

$2.6

FY12

$2.2

$1.6 $1.6 $1.6

FY13 FY14

$1.3 $1.3

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$1.8 BILLION 32,769

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Davis

Salt Lake

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Washington

Cache

Sanpete

Iron

Carbon

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

4,202 13,471 ND

228 1,229 4,591

24 1,114 154

23 33 981

52 102 342

0 18 296

ND ND 87

0 ND 115

ND ND 118

0 0 116

Reserve Total

1,381 ND

2,782 8,830

0 1,292

182 1,219

518 1,014

52 366

123 ND

0 ND

0 ND

0 116

106 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 UTAH 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Box Elder

Weber

Morgan

Summit

Tooele Salt Lake

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Salt Lake

Davis

Cache

Weber

Summit

Tooele

Utah

Box Elder

Wasatch

Morgan

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.4 B 

$848.7 M

$158.9 M

$129.8 M

$113.1 M

$110.3 M

$89.4 M

$43.8 M

$7.4 M 

$1.2 M

Davis

Salt Lake

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Cache

Washington

Box Elder

Iron

Sanpete

$1.3 B

$335.5 M

$86.2 M

$33.9 M

$27.0 M

$10.1 M

$7.2 M 

$4.6 M

$2.5 M

$2.4 M 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Tooele Salt Lake

Utah

Cache

Box Elder

Weber

Davis

Sanpete

Iron

Wasatch

Cache

Davis

Utah

Washington

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 107
VERMONT 

#51

$0.5 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#33 

1.4% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$783

PER RESIDENT 

#45

$0.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#51

4,262 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#51

$0.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 1%

Development: 9%

Service: 12%

Supplies and

Equipment: 79%

By Service 

Army 

39% 

Navy/Marines 

30% 

Air Force 

13% 

Other Defense 

19% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 5% Active Duty: 3% 

Civilian: 15% 

National 

Guard: 78% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

67% 

Navy/Marines 

2% 

Air Force 

31% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

United Technologies $156.8 M

General Dynamics $74.7 M

New England Woodcraft $22.1 M

IBM $15.6 M

GlobalFoundries $8.7 M

Omni Medical Systems $7.7 M

Norwich University Applied Research Institutes $6.4 M

Revision Militaire Inc. $4.0 M

Burlington Engineering Corporation $3.6 M

Benaka Inc. $3.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.5 $0.5

$0.4

FY12 FY16 FY17 FY18

$0.3

$0.3 $0.2 $0.2

FY13

$0.2

FY14 FY15 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$140.4 MILLION 4,262

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Reserve Total

Chittenden 82 564 2,141 ND ND

Washington 34 15 361 ND ND

Rutland 0 ND 115 109 ND

Franklin 0 ND 171 0 ND

Windsor ND 17 77 77 ND

Caledonia 0 ND 82 0 ND

Orange 0 0 80 0 80

Windham ND ND 69 0 ND

Bennington 0 0 74 0 74

Lamoille 0 0 57 0 57

108 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 VERMONT 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Lamoille Caledonia

Chittenden

Washington

Addison Orange

Windsor

Rutland

Bennington

Windham

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Addison

Chittenden

Rutland

Washington

Windsor

Bennington

Caledonia

Windham

Orange

Lamoille

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$157.5 M

$142.7 M

$23.8 M

$16.1 M

$3.9 M

$2.2 M 

$2.0 M

$1.6 M

 $562.6 K

 $218.8 K

Chittenden

Washington

Windsor

Rutland

Franklin

Caledonia

Addison

Windham

Orange

Lamoille

$106.7 M

$12.6 M

$5.0 M

$4.4 M 

$4.4 M 

$1.3 M

$1.3 M

$1.2 M

$980.6 K

$935.2 K

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Chittenden

Addison

Washington

Lamoille Caledonia

Orange

Windsor

Rutland

Windham

Franklin

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 109
VIRGINIA 

#2 

$60.3 B SPENT IN 

#1

10.6% OF STATE

10.9%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$7,066

PER RESIDENT 

#3 

$41.6 B CONTRACT 

#2 

249,014 NUMBER 

#1

$18.7 B PERSONNEL 

STATE GDP DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 10%

Supplies and

Equipment: 30%

Service: 59%

By Service 

Army 

19% 

Navy/Marines 

40% 

Air Force 

14% 

Other Defense 

27% 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve:7%

National Guard: 3% 

Active Duty: 50% Civilian: 40% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

23% 

Navy/Marines 

58% 

Air Force 

9% 

Other Defense 

10% 

Top Defense Contractors 

Huntington Ingalls

General Dynamics

Northrop Grumman

Booz Allen Hamilton

CACI

Leidos

Atlantic Diving Supply

Perspecta

Lockheed Martin

SAIC

(M = millions, B = billions)

$3.6 B

$1.8 B

$1.8 B

$1.7 B

$1.4 B

$1.3 B

$1.0 B

$884.7 M

$778.7 M

$644.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$41.6

$37.1 $37.3

FY12

$34.2 $34.5 $34.7

FY13 FY14

$32.0 $29.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

$18.7 BILLION 249,014

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County/City Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

Norfolk City 16,798 16,616 292 1,270 34,976

Virginia Beach City 17,545 3,823 827 4,723 26,918

Fairfax 6,928 12,374 620 2,912 22,834

Arlington 2,829 16,257 71 149 19,306

Portsmouth City 3,921 14,067 127 22 18,137

Prince William 8,095 4,373 281 744 13,493

Prince George 8,378 3,493 0 401 12,272

York 8,394 675 1,010 972 11,051

Newport News City 5,722 3,650 65 1,394 10,831

Accomack 6,856 83 108 678 7,725

110 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 VIRGINIA 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Accomack

York

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Loudoun

Fairfax

Prince William

Arlington

Alexandria City

Newport News City

Norfolk City

Virginia Beach City

Portsmouth City

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Fairfax

Newport News City

Arlington

Norfolk City

Virginia Beach City

Prince William

Loudoun

Alexandria City

Portsmouth City

Chesapeake City

(M = millions, B = billions)

$17.4 B

$3.9 B

$3.8 B

$2.9 B

$2.1 B

$2.0 B

$1.7 B

$1.4 B

$727.0 M

$584.5 M

Norfolk City

Fairfax

Arlington

Virginia Beach City

Portsmouth City

Accomack

Prince William

Newport News City

York

Prince George

$2.7 B 

$2.2 B 

$2.1 B

$1.7 B

$1.3 B

$982.1 M

$830.1 M

$682.2 M

$645.4 M

$642.4 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Chesapeake City

Fairfax

Prince William

Arlington

Norfolk City

Virginia Beach City

Prince George

Newport News City

Portsmouth City

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 111
WASHINGTON 

#8

$17.8 B SPENT IN 

#18

2.9% OF STATE GDP

3.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,343

PER RESIDENT 

#12

$11.2 B CONTRACT 

#7 

108,957 NUMBER 

#8

$6.7 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 2% Development: 3%

Service: 17%

Supplies and

Equipment: 78%

By Service 

Army 

5% 

Navy/Marines 

50% 

Air Force 

36% 

Other Defense 

8% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 9% National 

Guard: 7% 

Active Duty: 54% 

Civilian: 30% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

43% 

Navy/Marines 

45% 

Air Force 

11% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Boeing $7.8 B

Vigor Industrial $296.8 M

PacMed $153.7 M

Lockheed Martin $141.9 M

BP $122.5 M

International Marine and Industrial Applicators $108.3 M

Raytheon $88.8 M

Skookum Educational Programs $75.0 M

General Dynamics $74.0 M

Par Pacific Holdings $64.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$11.2

$9.4 $9.5 $8.6 $8.0 $7.8

$5.8 $5.9

FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$6.7 BILLION 108,957

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Pierce 29,411 7,632 2,879 5,417 45,339

Kitsap 4,777 19,409 100 908 25,194

Island 7,304 845 0 748 8,897

Spokane 3,216 1,001 1,490 796 6,503

Snohomish 707 541 321 1,344 2,913

King 454 973 1,202 142 2,771

Walla Walla ND 1,292 44 0 ND

Yakima 107 279 429 254 1,069

Clark 55 60 101 587 803

Thurston 89 83 181 115 468

112 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

WASHINGTON FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Snohomish

King

Pierce

Clark

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Whatcom

Skagit

Snohomish Island

Spokane Kitsap King

Pierce

Clark

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

King

Kitsap

Pierce

Klickitat

Snohomish

Spokane

Island

Whatcom

Clark

Skagit

(M = millions, B = billions)

$8.3 B

$791.2 M

$612.7 M

$337.1 M

$277.7 M 

$219.6 M

$136.9 M

$128.9 M

$75.5 M

$62.9 M

Pierce

Kitsap

Island

Spokane

King

Snohomish

Walla Walla

Yakima

Clark

Thurston

$2.7 B 

$1.9 B

$555.4 M

$303.8 M

$153.7 M

$138.2 M

$48.8 M

$34.3 M 

$24.2 M 

$21.9 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Island

Spokane Kitsap

Thurston

Klickitat

Yakima

Walla Walla

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 113
WEST VIRGINIA 

#42 

$1.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#27 

2.1% OF STATE GDP

0.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$907

PER RESIDENT 

#40

$1.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#45

10,279 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#47 

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0% Research and Development: 1%

Service: 9%

Supplies and

Equipment: 90%

By Service 

Army 

45% 

Navy/Marines 

38% 

Air Force 

10% 

Other Defense 

7% 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 1% 

Reserve: 19% Civilian: 19% 

National Guard: 61% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

72% 

Navy/Marines 

2% 

Air Force 

25% 

Other Defense 

0% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Northrop Grumman $760.5 M

BWX Technologies $271.9 M

Leidos $26.0 M

Boeing $21.8 M

United Technologies $17.4 M

Aero International $13.2 M

Nextgen Federal Systems $9.3 M

Salient CRGT $6.6 M

North American Consulting Services Inc. $4.1 M

Tetra Tech $4.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$1.3

$0.4

FY12 FY17

$0.3 $0.3 $0.3 $0.2 $0.2

FY15 FY16

$0.2

FY13 FY14 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$357.4 MILLION 10,279

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Kanawha 18 447 1,540

Berkeley ND 250 1,209

Preston 0 57 539

Putnam ND 117 406

Wood ND 56 343

Cabell 30 494 0

Fayette ND 11 485

Ohio ND 72 102

Harrison 19 44 177

Wayne 0 35 236

Reserve Total

375 2,380

43 ND

72 668

74 ND

196 ND

ND ND

0 ND

297 ND

73 313

42 313

114 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

WEST VIRGINIA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Ohio

Preston Berkeley

Harrison

Fayette

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Monongalia Mineral

Marion

Mason Harrison Jefferson

Kanawha

Cabell Nicholas

Greenbrier

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Mineral

Cabell

Greenbrier

Harrison

Marion

Monongalia

Kanawha

Jefferson

Nicholas

Mason

(M = millions)

$781.0 M

$274.2 M 

$57.9 M

$35.2 M

$26.4 M

$20.8 M

$17.2 M

$13.6 M

$7.4 M 

$5.5 M

Kanawha

Berkeley

Cabell

Preston

Wood

Putnam

Ohio

Fayette

Harrison

Wayne

$96.8 M

$46.1 M

$41.4 M

$23.5 M

$21.8 M

$18.8 M

$16.3 M

$12.6 M

$11.3 M

$7.0 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Cabell

Kanawha

Wood

Putnam

Wayne

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 115
WISCONSIN 

#21

$7.7 B SPENT IN 

#26

2.2% OF STATE GDP

1.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,317

PER RESIDENT 

#16

$7.1 B CONTRACT 

#36

17,816 NUMBER OF 

#41

$0.6 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 1% Development: 1%

Service: 5%

Supplies and

Equipment: 93%

By Service 

Army 

43% 

Navy/Marines 

46% 

Air Force 

1% 

Other Defense 

10% 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 4% 

Civilian: 16% Reserve: 26% 

National Guard: 53% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

77% 

Navy/Marines 

6% 

Air Force 

16% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Oshkosh Corp. $2.8 B

Fincantieri Marine Systems $2.7 B

Enpro Industries Inc. $151.1 M

UnitedHealth Group $150.8 M

Leonardo SpA $77.9 M

Konecranes Inc. $72.8 M

Snap-On $65.8 M

Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance $65.2 M

National Presto Industries $48.0 M

Milwaukee Valve Company Inc. $42.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$7.1

$3.0 $3.0 $2.4 $2.4 $2.6 $2.1

FY12 FY13

$1.3

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$558.7 MILLION 17,816

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Dane

Milwaukee

Monroe

Juneau

Brown

Waukesha

Winnebago

Marathon

Fond du Lac

Racine

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

145 575 2,368

205 394 1,446

289 1,145 283

0 182 726

13 29 148

ND 18 401

39 46 166

ND 19 155

ND 0 209

ND ND 117

Reserve

693

1,238

636

0

533

170

270

194

97

162

Total

3,781

3,283

2,353

908

723

ND

521

ND

ND

ND

116 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

WISCONSIN FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Buffalo

Marinette

Brown

Winnebago

Fond du Lac

Dane

Waukesha

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Monroe

La Crosse

Marinette

Outagamie

Winnebago

Dane

Waukesha

Milwaukee

Rock

Kenosha

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Winnebago

Marinette

Waukesha

Milwaukee

Rock

Dane

La Crosse

Monroe

Kenosha

Outagamie

(M = millions)

$2.8 B

$2.7 B 

$286.2 M

$252.4 M

$249.0 M

$223.5 M

$170.8 M

$125.3 M

$72.3 M 

$29.4 M

Dane

Monroe

Milwaukee

Juneau

Brown

Waukesha

Winnebago

Buffalo

Marinette

Fond du Lac

$132.7 M

$125.2 M

$103.3 M

$27.3 M 

$17.1 M

$12.6 M

$12.5 M

$8.8 M

$8.5 M

$8.2 M

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Monroe

Milwaukee

Juneau

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 117
 

WYOMING 

#50

$0.6 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#35

1.4% OF STATE GDP

0.1%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$997

PER RESIDENT 

#48

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#49

7,229 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#49

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies and Equipment: 11%

Service: 29%

Research and Construction: 59%

Development: 1%

By Service 

Army 

67% 

Navy/Marines 

1% 

Air Force 

28% 

Other Defense 

4% 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 3% 

Active Duty: 43% 

National 

Guard: 38% 

Civilian: 16% 

Allocations, By Service 

Army 

26% 

Navy/Marines 

1% 

Air Force 

72% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Fluor Corp. $57.0 M

Ames Construction $43.3 M

M1 Support Services $23.1 M

Morgan Engineering Systems Inc. $13.2 M

AECOM $7.9 M

Polar Net $5.7 M

M2 Technology $5.4 M

High West Energy Inc. $3.7 M

Colas Inc. $3.2 M

Osint Data $2.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.2

$0.2 $0.2

$0.1

FY12

$0.1 $0.1 $0.1

FY13 FY14

$0.1

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

$329.2 MILLION 7,229

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Reserve Total

Laramie 3,070 1,025 1,777 133 6,005

Platte 57 69 163 0 289

Natrona ND ND 125 56 ND

Albany ND ND 96 0 ND

Lincoln 0 ND 96 0 ND

Campbell 0 ND 91 0 ND

Sheridan 0 ND 52 22 ND

Sweetwater 0 0 70 0 70

Uinta 0 ND 59 0 ND

Fremont 0 ND 61 0 ND

118 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 WYOMING 

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

Campbell

Sheridan

Lincoln

Sweetwater

Uinta

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Park Big Horn

Sheridan

Teton

Fremont Natrona

Albany Platte

Laramie

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions)

Laramie

Teton

Albany

Park

Platte

Natrona

Sublette

Sheridan

Fremont

Big Horn

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$212.2 M

$11.0 M

$8.4 M

$6.6 M

$2.9 M

$2.2 M 

$2.2 M 

$1.7 M

 $532.4 K

 $262.9 K

Laramie

Platte

Natrona

Albany

Lincoln

Campbell

Sheridan

Fremont

Uinta

Sweetwater

$297.5 M

$10.6 M

$5.6 M

$3.6 M

$2.3 M 

$2.0 M

$1.9 M

$1.3 M

$1.2 M

$734.3 K 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Albany Platte

Laramie

Fremont Natrona

Sublette

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 119
APPENDIX 1: MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

ALABAMA Buckeye TS Army Guard Maricopa

Anniston Army Depot Army Active Calhoun Camp Navajo Army Guard Coconino

Birmingham Airport AF Guard Jefferson Davis Monthan AFB AF Active Pima

Fort Benning Army Active Russell Florence Military Reservation Army Guard Pinal

Fort McClellan ARNG Training Center Army Guard Calhoun Fort Huachuca Army Active Cochise

Fort Rucker Army Active Dale Luke AFB AF Active Maricopa

Maxwell AFB AF Active Montgomery MCAS Yuma MC Active Yuma

Montgomery JFHQ AFRC / CSMS 01 Army Guard Montgomery Papago Military Reservation Army Guard Maricopa

Montgomery Regional Airport ANGB AF Guard Montgomery Picacho Aviation TS Army Guard Pinal

Redstone Arsenal Army Active Madison Silver Bell Army Heliport Army Guard Pinal

RW Shepherd Hope Hull Army Guard Montgomery Sky Harbor IAP AF Guard Maricopa

The Barry M Goldwater Air Force Range AF Active Maricopa

ALASKA Tucson IAP AF Guard Pima

Alcantra Armory Complex Army Guard Matanuska-Susitna Yuma Proving Ground Army Active La Paz

Clear Air Force Station AF Active Denali

Eareckson AS AF Active Aleutians West ARKANSAS 

Eielson AFB AF Active Fairbanks North Star Camp Joseph T Robinson Army Guard Pulaski

Elmendorf AFB AF Active Anchorage Fort Chaffee MTC Army Guard Sebastian

Fort Greely Army Active Southeast Fairbanks Fort Smith MAP AF Guard Sebastian

Fort Richardson AF Active Anchorage Little Rock AFB AF Active Pulaski

Fort Wainwright Army Active Fairbanks North Star Pine Bluff Arsenal Army Active Jefferson

ARIZONA CALIFORNIA 

Air Force Plant 44 AF Active Pima Air Force Plant 42 AF Active Los Angeles

Barry Goldwater Range MC Active Yuma Beale AFB AF Active Yuba

120 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Site Service County

Joint

Base Site Service County

Joint

Base 

Channel Islands ANG Station

Edwards AFB

Fort Hunter Liggett

Fresno Yosemite International ANG

ITC Camp San Luis Obisbo

Los Angeles AFB

March ARB

MCAS Miramar

MCB Camp Pendleton

MCLB Barstow

MCRD San Diego

Military Ocean Terminal Concord

MTC-H Camp Roberts

NAF El Centro

NAS Lemoore CA

NAVBASE Coronado

NAVBASE Point Loma

NAVBASE San Diego CA

NAVBASE Ventura Cty Point Mugu CA

NAVSUPPACT Monterey CA

NAVWPNSTA Seal Beach

NAWS China Lake

Norwalk 2

NTC and Fort Irwin

Port Hueneme

Presidio of Monterey

Sierra Army Depot

Travis AFB

TS AFRC Los Alamitos

Twentynine Palms

Vandenberg Main Base

COLORADO 

Buckley AFB

Cheyenne Mountain AFS

Fort Carson

Peterson AFB

Pueblo Chemical Depot

Schriever AFB

USAF Academy

CONNECTICUT 

Bradley IAP

Camp Hartell

Camp Niantic

NAVSUBASE New London CT

Stones Ranch Military Res

DELAWARE 

Bethany Beach TS

Dover AFB

New Castle Airport

River Road Training Site

AF Guard

AF Active

Army Reserve

AF Guard

Army Guard

AF Active

AF Reserve

MC Active

MC Active

MC Active

MC Active

Army Active

Army Guard

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

AF Reserve

Army Active

Navy Active

Army Active

Army Active

AF Active

Army Guard

MC Active

AF Active

AF Active

AF Active

Army Active

AF Active

Army Active

AF Active

AF Active

AF Guard

Army Guard

Army Guard

Navy Active

Army Guard

Army Guard

AF Active

AF Guard

Army Guard

Ventura

Kern

Monterey

Fresno

San Luis Obispo

Los Angeles

Riverside

San Diego

San Diego

San Bernardino

San Diego

Contra Costa

San Luis Obispo

Imperial

Kings

San Diego

San Diego

San Diego

Ventura

Monterey

Orange

Inyo

Los Angeles

San Bernardino

Ventura

Monterey

Lassen

Solano

Orange

San Bernardino

Santa Barbara

Arapahoe

El Paso

El Paso

El Paso

Pueblo

El Paso

El Paso

Hartford

Hartford

New London

New London

New London

Sussex

Kent

New Castle

New Castle

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

JBAB Anacostia Bolling

NSA Washington

FLORIDA 

Eglin AFB

Homestead ARB

Hurlburt Field

Jacksonville IAP

MacDill AFB

MCSF Blount Island (FL)

NAS Jacksonville FL

NAS Key West FL

NAS Pensacola FL

NAS Whiting Field Milton FL

NAVSTA Mayport FL

NSA Orlando

NSA Panama City

Patrick AFB

Tyndall AFB

GEORGIA 

Air Force Plant 6

Atlanta - Confederate Ave

Cumming

Dobbins ARB

Fort Benning GA

Fort Gordon

Fort Stewart

General Lucius D Clay National Guard Center

Macon Readiness Center

MCLB Albany

Moody AFB

NAVSUBASE Kings Bay

Oglethorpe Armory

Robins AFB

Savannah/Hilton Head IAP

VTS Catoosa

HAWAII 

CNIC PMRF Barking Sands HI

Fort Shafter

Ft Ruger

JBPHH Pearl Harbor HI

Kalaeloa

MCB Hawaii (Kaneohe Bay)

Schofield Barracks Military Reservation

TS Keaukaha Mil Res

IDAHO 

Bayview Idaho

Boise Air Terminal

Mountain Home AFB

Orchard Combat Training Center

Navy Active

Navy Active

AF Active

AF Reserve

AF Active

AF Guard

AF Active

MC Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

Navy Active

AF Active

AF Active

AF Active

Army Guard

Army Guard

AF Reserve

Army Active

Army Active

Army Active

Army Guard

Army Guard

MC Active

AF Active

Navy Active

Army Guard

AF Active

AF Guard

Army Guard

Navy Active

Army Active

Army Guard

Navy Active

Army Guard

MC Active

Army Active

Army Guard

Navy Active

AF Guard

AF Active

Army Guard

District of Columbia

District of Columbia

Okaloosa

Miami-Dade

Okaloosa

Duval

Hillsborough

Duval

Duval

Monroe

Escambia

Santa Rosa

Duval

Orange

Bay

Brevard

Bay

Cobb

Fulton

Forsyth

Cobb

Chattahoochee

Richmond

Liberty

Cobb

Bibb

Dougherty

Lowndes

Camden

Clayton

Houston

Chatham

Catoosa

Kauai

Honolulu

Honolulu

Honolulu

Honolulu

Honolulu

Honolulu

Hawaii

Kootenai

Ada

Elmore

Ada

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 121
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

Orchard Mates Boise Army Guard Ada Esler Field Army Guard Rapides

Fort Polk Army Active Vernon

ILLINOIS Hammond Airport Army Guard Tangipahoa

Capital Airport AF Guard Sangamon Jackson Bks Army Guard Orleans

General Wayne A Downing Peoria IAP AF Guard Peoria NAS JRB New Orleans LA Navy Active Plaquemines

Joliet USARC/JTA Army Reserve Will NAS JRB New Orleans LA AF Guard Plaquemines

Marseilles (MTA Tng Area) Army Guard LaSalle

Naval Station Great Lakes IL Navy Active Lake MAINE 

Rock Island Arsenal Army Active Rock Island Auburn Training Site Army Guard Androscoggin

Scott AFB AF Active St. Clair Bangor IAP AF Guard Penobscot

Sparta Armory Army Guard Randolph Bangor Training Site Army Guard Penobscot

Springfield (TS Cp Lincoln) Army Guard Sangamon Bog Brook Training Site Army Guard Oxford

DFAS Annex AF Active Aroostook

INDIANA Hollis Plains Training Site Army Guard York

Camp Atterbury Army Guard Bartholomew NSY Portsmouth Navy Active York

Grissom ARB AF Reserve Miami

Hulman Fld AF Guard Vigo MARYLAND 

Indianapolis 38 ID Army Guard Marion Aberdeen Proving Ground Army Active Harford

Knightstown Army Guard Rush Fort Detrick Army Active Frederick

Muscatatuck Urban Training Center Army Guard Jennings Fort George G Meade Army Active Anne Arundel

NSA Crane Navy Active Martin Havre De Grace Military Res Army Guard Harford

Shelbyville Army Guard Shelby JB Andrews AF Active Prince George's

Martin State Airport AF Guard Baltimore

IOWA MTA Camp Fretterd Army Guard Baltimore

Camp Dodge Johnston TS Army Guard Polk MTA Gunpowder Military Reservation Army Guard Baltimore

Des Moines IAP AF Guard Polk Naval Air Station Patuxent River Navy Active St. Mary's

Iowa AAP Army Active Des Moines NAVSUPPACT Annapolis Navy Active Anne Arundel

Sioux Gateway Airport (ANG) AF Guard Woodbury NAVSUPPACT Bethesda MD Navy Active Montgomery

US Army Adelphi Laboratory Center Army Active Montgomery

KANSAS 

Forbes Field ANG AF Guard Shawnee MASSACHUSETTS 

Fort Leavenworth Army Active Leavenworth Ayer Army Guard Middlesex

Fort Riley Army Active Riley Barnes Map (ANG) AF Guard Hampden

JFHQ-Kansas Army Guard Shawnee Cape Cod Air Station AF Active Barnstable

McConnell AFB AF Active Sedgwick Devens Reserve Forces Tng Area Army Reserve Worcester

Salina KS Training Center Army Guard Saline Hanscom AFB AF Active Middlesex

Smoky Hill ANG Range AF Guard Saline MTA Camp Curtis Guil Army Guard Essex

MTA Camp Edwards Army Guard Barnstable

KENTUCKY Otis ANG Base AF Guard Barnstable

Blue Grass Army Depot Army Active Madison US Army Soldier Systems Center Natick Army Active Middlesex

Fort Campbell KY Army Active Christian Westover ARB AF Reserve Hampden

Fort Knox Army Active Hardin

Frankfort Boone NG Center Army Guard Franklin MICHIGAN 

Louisville IAP-Standiford FL Site 1 AF Guard Jefferson Alpena County Regional Airport AF Guard Alpena

WH Ford Regional Tng Ctr Army Guard Muhlenberg CTC Fort Custer Trng Center Army Guard Kalamazoo

Detroit Arsenal Army Active Macomb

LOUISIANA Lansing Joint Forces Readiness Center Army Guard Ingham

Barksdale AFB AF Active Bossier MTC-H Camp Grayling Army Guard Crawford

Baton Rouge AFRC Army Guard East Baton Rouge Selfridge ANGB AF Guard Macomb

Beauregard Training Range Army Guard Rapides US Army Garrison Selfridge Army Active Macomb

Camp Beauregard Army Guard Rapides W K Kellogg AF Guard Calhoun

Camp Minden Training Site Army Guard Webster

Camp Villere Army Guard St. Tammany MINNESOTA 

Carville Gillis Long Center Army Guard Iberville Camp Ripley Army Guard Morrison

122 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint

Site Service County Base Site 

Duluth IAP AF Guard St. Louis Reno Tahoe IAP

Minn-St Paul AF Reserve Hennepin

NEW HAMPSHIRE 

MISSISSIPPI New Boston Air Station

CBC Gulfport MS Navy Active Harrison Newington Defense Fuel Support Point

Columbus AFB AF Active Lowndes NG New Hampshire Training Site

CTA Camp McCain Army Guard Grenada Pease ANGB

Gulfport AVCRAD Army Guard Harrison

Gulfport-Biloxi Regional Airport (ANG) AF Guard Harrison NEW JERSEY 

Jackson IAP Thompson Field AF Guard Rankin Atlantic City IAP

Keesler AFB AF Active Harrison Dix

MTA Camp Shelby Army Guard Perry Lakehurst

NAS Meridian MS Navy Active Lauderdale Lawrenceville

OLF Bravo Navy Active Kemper McGuire

Woolmarket (De Soto) Navy Active Harrison Naval Weapons Station Earle NJ

Picatinny Arsenal

MISSOURI Sea Girt NJ NGTC

Fort Leonard Wood Army Active Pulaski USAF Expeditionary Center

Lake City AAP Army Active Jackson

Macon TS Army Guard Macon NEW MEXICO 

MTA Camp Clark Nevada Army Guard Vernon Cannon AFB

MTA Camp Crowder Neosho Army Guard Newton Cannon AFB Site 2

NGA Arnold Site AF Active Jefferson Holloman AFB

Rosecrans MAP (139AG) AF Guard Buchanan Kirtland

Springfield AVCRAD (New) Army Guard Greene Las Cruces

St Louis Air Force Station AF Active St. Louis City Melrose Air Force Range

TS Clark Natl Forest Wappapello Army Guard Butler Rio Rancho TS

TS Ike Skelton Jefferson City Army Guard Cole Santa Fe - Onate Complex TS

Whiteman AFB AF Active Johnson White Sands Missile Range NM

MONTANA NEW YORK 

Great Falls IAP AF Guard Cascade Brooklyn NY

Helena Aviation RC- AASF- C12 Army Guard Lewis and Clark Camp Smith Tng Site

Malmstrom AFB AF Active Cascade Fort Drum

MTA Ft Wm Henry Harrison Army Guard Lewis and Clark Fort Hamilton

MTA Limestone Hills Army Guard Broadwater Francis S Gabreski Airport

Hancock Field

NEBRASKA Niagara Falls

Camp Ashland Army Guard Sarpy NSA Saratoga Springs NY

Grand Island AASF/RC Army Guard Hall Rome Laboratory

Greenlief TS/UTES 01 Army Guard Clay Schenectady ANG MAP

Lincoln AASF/Readiness Center Army Guard Lancaster Stewart Annex

Lincoln MAP AF Guard Lancaster Stewart IAP

Mead TS/FMS 06/Utes 02 Army Guard Saunders Syracuse MCRC

Offut AFB AF Active Sarpy Verona Defense Fuel Support Point

Watervliet Arsenal

NEVADA West Point Military Reservation

Anthony Cometa Complex Army Guard Clark Youngstown Tng Site

Creech AFB AF Active Clark

Floyd Edsall Training Center Army Guard Clark NORTH CAROLINA 

Hawthorne Army Depot Army Active Mineral ALF Bogue

NAS Fallon NV Navy Active Churchill Camp Mackall

Nellis AFB AF Active Clark Charlotte/Douglas IAP

Nellis Air Force Range AF Active Nye Dare County Range

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019

Service

AF Guard

AF Active

AF Active

Army Guard

AF Guard

AF Guard

AF Active

AF Active

Army Guard

AF Active

Navy Active

Army Active

Army Guard

AF Active

AF Active

AF Active

AF Active

AF Active

Army Guard

AF Active

Army Guard

Army Guard

Army Active

MC Reserve

Army Guard

Army Active

Army Active

AF Guard

AF Guard

AF Reserve

Navy Active

AF Active

AF Guard

Army Active

AF Guard

MC Reserve

AF Active

Army Active

Army Active

Army Guard

MC Active

Army Active

AF Guard

AF Active

County

Washoe

Hillsborough

Rockingham

Strafford

Rockingham

Atlantic

Burlington

Ocean

Mercer

Burlington

Monmouth

Morris

Monmouth

Burlington

Curry

Curry

Otero

Bernalillo

Dona Ana

Roosevelt

Sandoval

Santa Fe

Socorro

Kings

Westchester

Jefferson

Kings

Suffolk

Onondaga

Niagara

Saratoga

Oneida

Schenectady

Orange

Orange

Onondaga

Oneida

Albany

Orange

Niagara

Carteret

Scotland

Mecklenburg

Dare

Joint

Base 

123 
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

Fort Bragg Army Active Cumberland OREGON 

MCAS Cherry Point MC Active Craven Biak Training Center COUTES Army Guard Deschutes

MCB Camp Lejeune (East Site) MC Active Onslow Camp Adair Corvallis Army Guard Benton

MCB Camp Lejeune (West Site) MC Active Onslow Camp Withycombe Clackamas Army Guard Clackamas

Military Ocean Tml Sunny Point Army Active Brunswick Lane County AFRC FMS 5 Army Guard Lane

MTA Camp Butner Army Guard Granville McNary Field Salem AASF Army Guard Marion

Oak Grove MC Active Jones MTA Camp Rilea Army Guard Clatsop

OLF Atlantic MC Active Carteret NAVWPNSYSTRAFAC Boardman Navy Active Morrow

Raleigh Army Guard Wake Portland IAP ANG AF Guard Multnomah

Seymour Johnson AFB AF Active Wayne

PENNSYLVANIA 

NORTH DAKOTA Cambridge Springs Army Guard Crawford

Bismarck RJB Complex Army Guard Burleigh Carlisle Barracks Army Active Cumberland

Camp Grafton Army Guard Ramsey Collegeville FMS 4 Army Guard Montgomery

Cavalier AS AF Active Pembina Defense Distrib Depot Susq Army Active York

Grand Forks AFB AF Active Grand Forks Det Phil Pny Annex Navy Active Philadelphia

Grand Forks Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Grand Forks Det Philadelphia PA Navy Active Philadelphia

Hector IAP AF Guard Cass Fort Indiantown Gap Army Guard Lebanon

Minot AFB AF Active Ward Hollidaysburg Readiness Center Army Guard Blair

Letterkenny Army Depot Army Active Franklin

OHIO NAVSUPPACT Mechanicsburg PA Navy Active Cumberland

Beightler Armory Army Guard Franklin New Castle Readiness Center/FMS 9 Army Guard Lawrence

Bratenahl Navy Active Cuyahoga Pittsburgh IAP (ANG) AF Guard Allegheny

Camp Perry Joint Training Center Army Guard Ottawa Pittsburgh IAP (ARS) AF Reserve Allegheny

Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center Army Guard Portage Scranton AAP Army Active Lackawanna

Camp Sherman Joint Training Center Army Guard Ross Spring City Readiness Center Army Guard Chester

Defense Supply Center Columbus Army Active Franklin Tobyhanna Army Depot Army Active Monroe

McConnelsville Training Site Army Guard Morgan

Rickenbacker AF Guard Franklin RHODE ISLAND 

Rickenbacker (MTA) Army Guard Franklin Camp Fogarty Tng Site Army Guard Kent

Springfield Beckley AF Guard Clark Fort Adams RI Navy Active Newport

Toledo/Exp Airport AF Guard Lucas Gould Island RI Navy Active Newport

US Army Joint Sys Mfg Ctr Lima Army Active Allen Naval Station Newport RI Navy Active Newport

Wright-Patterson AFB AF Active Greene Quonset State Airport AF Guard Washington

Youngstown AF Reserve Trumbull

SOUTH CAROLINA 

OKLAHOMA Charleston AFB AF Active Charleston

Altus AFB AF Active Jackson Charleston Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Berkeley

Camp Gruber Army Guard Muskogee Fort Jackson Army Active Richland

Fort Sill Army Active Comanche Joint Base Charleston Naval Weapons Station AF Active Berkeley

Kegelman Air Force Auxiliary Field AF Active Alfalfa Joint Base Charleston North Yard AF Active Charleston

Lexington AASF No 1 Army Guard Cleveland MCAS Beaufort MC Active Beaufort

McAlester AAP Army Active Pittsburg McEntire Joint National Guard Base AF Guard Richland

Muskogee AFRC Army Guard Muskogee MCRD Beaufort MC Active Beaufort

Norman CSMS Army Guard Cleveland MTA Clarks Hill Reservation Army Guard McCormick

Oklahoma Military Department Army Guard Oklahoma NAVSUPPFAC Beaufort SC Navy Active Beaufort

Tinker Aerospace Complex AF Active Oklahoma North Air Force Auxiliary Field AF Active Orangeburg

Tinker AFB AF Active Oklahoma Poinsett Electronic Combat Range AF Active Sumter

Tinker Support Annex AF Active Oklahoma Shaw AFB AF Active Sumter

Tulsa IAP AF Guard Tulsa

Vance AFB AF Active Garfield SOUTH DAKOTA 

Will Rogers World Airport AF Guard Oklahoma Camp Rapid Army Guard Pennington

Ellsworth AFB AF Active Meade

Ellsworth AFB Site 2 AF Active Pennington

124 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Joint Joint

Site Service County Base Site Service County Base 

Joe Foss Field AF Guard Minnehaha Saginaw Army Guard Tarrant

Mitchell Complex Army Guard Davison Seguin Auxiliary Field AF Active Guadalupe

Sioux Falls Benson Rd Complex Army Guard Minnehaha Sheppard AFB AF Active Wichita

West Camp Army Guard Pennington Yankee Target Range Navy Active McMullen

TENNESSEE UTAH 

Arnold AF Active Coffee Dugway Proving Ground Army Active Tooele

Fort Campbell TN Army Active Montgomery Hill AFB AF Active Davis

Holston AAP Army Active Hawkins MTA-L Camp Williams Army Guard Utah

Jackson Airport Armory Army Guard Madison NAVPMOSSP Magna Utah Navy Active Salt Lake

Johnson City Gray Army Guard Washington Saint George/FMS 5B Army Guard Washington

McGhee Tyson Airport AF Guard Blount Salt Lake City IAP AF Guard Salt Lake

Memphis IAP AF Guard Shelby Tooele Army Depot Army Active Tooele

Milan AAP Army Active Gibson Utah Test and Training Range South UT AF Active Tooele

Nashville Army Guard Davidson UTTR - North AF Active Box Elder

Nashville IAP AF Guard Davidson

NAVSUPPACT Midsouth Memphis TN Navy Active Shelby VERMONT 

Northside Mid-South Navy Active Shelby Burlington IAP AF Guard Chittenden

NSWC Carderock Div Navy Active Shelby Ethan Allen AFB MTA Army Guard Chittenden

VTS Milan Army Guard Carroll TS Camp Johnson Army Guard Chittenden

VTS Smyrna Army Guard Rutherford TS Ethan Allen Range Army Guard Chittenden

Westminster Training Site Army Guard Windham

TEXAS 

Air Force Plant 4 AF Active Tarrant VIRGINIA 

ALF Cabaniss Navy Active Nueces AASF Byrd Field Army Guard Henrico

ALF Orange Navy Active Jim Wells ALF Fentress Chesapke Navy Active Chesapeake City

ALF Waldron Navy Active Nueces Arlington National Cemetery Army Active Arlington

Bergstrom - (Abia) Army Guard Travis Arlington Service Ctr Navy Active Arlington

Brooks AFB AF Active Bexar Camp Pendleton SMR Army Guard Virginia Beach City

Camp Bullis Training Annex AF Active Bexar Cheatham Annex Navy Active York

Camp Mabry Army Guard Travis Craney Island Navy Active Portsmouth City

Camp Maxey Army Guard Lamar Def Gen Supply Center Army Active Chesterfield

Camp Swift Army Guard Bastrop Elizabeth Rvr Channel Navy Active Portsmouth City

Dixie Target Range Navy Active McMullen Fire Fighters School Navy Active Norfolk City

Dyess AFB AF Active Taylor Fort A P Hill Army Active Caroline

Ellington Field AF Guard Harris Fort Belvoir Army Active Fairfax

Fort Bliss Army Active El Paso Fort Eustis AF Active Newport News City

Fort Hood Army Active Coryell Fort Lee Army Active Prince George

Fort Wolters Army Guard Parker Fort Myer Army Active Arlington

Fort Worth - Shoreview Army Guard Tarrant Fort Pickett ARMTC Army Guard Nottoway

Goodfellow AFB AF Active Tom Green JEBLCFS East Navy Active Virginia Beach City

Grand Prairie Reserve Complex Army Reserve Dallas JEBLCFS Wallops Island VA Navy Active Accomack

JBSA Sam Houston AF Active Bexar JNTEXPBASE Little Creek FS VA Navy Active Virginia Beach City

Kelly AFB AF Active Bexar Lafayette Rvr Complex Navy Active Norfolk City

Lackland AFB AF Active Bexar Langley AFB AF Active Hampton City

Laughlin AFB AF Active Val Verde Mark Center WHS Alexandria City

Martindale - AASF Army Guard Bexar MCB Quantico MC Active Stafford

Medical Center Annex AF Active Bexar NAS Oceana VA Navy Active Virginia Beach City

NALF Goliad Navy Active Goliad Naval Weapons Station Yorktown Navy Active York

NAS Corpus Christi TX Navy Active Nueces NAVMEDCEN Portsmouth VA Navy Active Portsmouth City

NAS Fort Worth JRB TX Navy Active Tarrant NAVSTA Norfolk VA Navy Active Norfolk City

NAS Kingsville TX Navy Active Kleberg NAVSUPPACT Hampton Roads VA Navy Active Norfolk City

Randolph AFB AF Active Bexar NAVSUPPACT Norfolk NSY Navy Active Portsmouth City

Red River Army Depot Army Active Bowie NNSY South Gate Navy Active Portsmouth City

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 125
MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY 

Site Service

Joint Joint

County Base Site Service County Base 

NNSY St Helena Navy Active Norfolk City WYOMING 

Northwest Chesapeake VA Navy Active Chesapeake City Cheyenne Regional Airport AF Guard Laramie

NSA South Potomac Navy Active King George F E Warren AFB AF Active Laramie

Pentagon Building Site WHS Arlington MTCH Camp Guernsey Army Guard Platte

Pumpkin Neck Navy Active King George

Radford AAP Army Active Montgomery

Rivanna Station Army Active Source: Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas data Fiscal Year 2015, from Albemarle authoritative sources provided to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

SDA Area Navy Active Norfolk City Energy, Installations, and Environment by Component Installation Geospatial Information 

St Juliens Creek East Navy Active and Services Programs. Chesapeake City

Yorktown Fuel Depot Navy Active York

WASHINGTON 

Bangor WA Navy Active Kitsap

Bremerton Army Guard Kitsap

Camp Murray Army Guard Pierce

CNI NAVMAG Indian Island Navy Active Jefferson

Cusick Survival Training Site AF Active Pend Oreille

Fairchild AFB AF Active Spokane

Fort Lewis Army Active Pierce

Grant Training Annex Army Active Grant

Jim Creek Navy Active Snohomish

Keyport NUWC Navy Active Kitsap

Manchester Navy Active Kitsap

Marysville WA Navy Active Snohomish

NAS Whidbey Island WA Navy Active Island

Naval Base Kitsap Bremerton WA Navy Active Kitsap

NAVSTA Everett WA Navy Active Snohomish

OLF Coupeville Navy Active Island

Sea Plane Base Navy Active Island

Shipyard Puget Sound Navy Active Kitsap

White Bluff AF Active Spokane

Yakima Training Center Army Active Yakima

WEST VIRGINIA 

Allegany Ballistics Lab Navy Active Mineral

CTC Camp Dawson-Kingwood Army Guard Preston

Elkins AFRC Army Guard Randolph

EWVRA Shepherd Field AF Guard Berkeley

Jackson County AFRC Army Guard Jackson

Volkstone Army Guard Preston

Williamstown Army Guard Wood

Yeager Airport AF Guard Kanawha

WISCONSIN 

Camp Williams Tomah MTA Army Guard Juneau

Fort McCoy Army Reserve Monroe

Gen Mitchell IAP AF Guard Milwaukee

Truax ANGB AF Guard Dane

Volk ANGB AF Guard Juneau

W Silver Spring Complex Army Reserve Milwaukee

126 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
APPENDIX 2: METHODOLOGY

This section contains additional details on the processes applied to derive the statistics provided in the state profiles 

throughout this report, as well as information on the military installations depicted in the maps in those profiles. 

A. Defense Contracts

This section refers to U.S. Department of Defense (DoD)

contract obligations during fiscal year (FY) 2019 (i.e.,

October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019). Gross pay,

which is discussed in section F, is the only other type of

defense spending included in this report.

This report analyzes contract obligation because contracts 

are the principal method through which the DoD and 

other federal agencies spend money. The phrase “contract 

spending” reflects federal agencies’ use of contracts with 

suppliers to purchase all products and services over a 

legally specified threshold, which increased to $5,000 on 

April 13, 2018, and to $10,000 on August 31, 2018 (federal 

agencies can use agency credit cards to buy products and 

services valued at less than those amounts). While the 

DoD and other federal agencies obligate funds through 

other means, those payments comprise a small percentage 

of the DoD’s total expenditures.С

Contract obligation amounts are calculated from data

obtained through USAspending.gov, a publicly available

database of unclassified federal spending maintained by

the U.S. Department. All of the nearly 30 million award

transactions the researchers downloaded from USAspending.

gov for this report listed the DoD as the “funding agency,” and

most of those records (92 percent) also listed the DoD as the

“contracting agency.”Т Contract spending amounts reflect 

obligations rather than actual expenditures. Totals are 

comprised of:

• Prime awards that federal agencies provide

to private- and public-sector organizations and

individuals for products (e.g., clothing and ships)

and services (e.g., information technology and

research and development), and

• Sub-awards that prime award recipients provide

to sub-contractors.У

Contract spending figures in this report have not been 

adjusted for inflation; they have been adjusted to reliably 

reflect the location in which the spending occurred.

Prime and Sub-Award Reporting

Steps were taken to ensure the prime and sub-award 

data were accurately reported. In cases where a prime 

contractor gave a subcontract to another vendor, the 

subcontract amount was subtracted from the prime 

contractor’s total, as well as the totals for the state 

and county in which the prime contractor was located. 

Moreover, the amount was added to the subcontractor’s 

total and the spending for the state and county in which 

the subcontractor was located.

Fiscal Years for Contract Spending

This report incorporates two different methods for 

assigning prime and sub-awards to a particular fiscal year. 

The researchers allocated spending associated with prime 

awards to the fiscal year in which the prime award was 

obligated, and allocated all subsequent additions and 

subtractions of funds to the fiscal year in which those 

funding changes occurred. For example, if a prime award 

of $100 was signed on March 1, 2017, then the $100 in 

funds was allocated to FY 2017. If the DoD added $50 to 

the contract on October 15, 2017, then such funds were 

assigned to FY 2018. If the DoD deducted $25 from the 

same prime award on April 30, 2019, then that deduction 

was allocated to FY 2019.

ϥ

 Office of of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, August ϥϣ, ϤϢϢϪ, https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USAϢϢϤϤϨϢ-ϣϪ-DPC.

pdf. In FY ϤϢϣϫ, the DoD spent Χϧ.Ϣ billion in grants, Χϥϣ.ϥ million in direct payments, ΧϣϪϧ.ϧ million in financial assistance, and nothing on loans--a total of Χϧ.Ϥ billion, 

approximately Ϣ.ϫ percent of the department's total spending. These figures are based on data obtained from USAspending.gov. Ϧ In USAspending.gov prime award records, the contracting agency is listed in the “awarding_agency_name” field and the “funding_agency_name” field lists the funding 

agency. See U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, https://www.usaspending.gov/#/download_center/data_dictionary. ϧ

 In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation clause ϧϤ.ϤϢϦ-ϣϢ (Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards), prime contractors awarded 

a federal contract or order are required to file a sub-award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime contractor awards any subcontract 

greater than ΧϥϢ,ϢϢϢ. (General Services Administration, “About FFATA,” accessed December ϤϢ, ϤϢϣϫ, https://www.fsrs.gov/#a-faqs.)

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 127
Sub-award amounts were deducted from the fiscal year in 

which the associated prime award was made and added 

to the fiscal year during which the sub-award was made. 

Continuing with the previous example, if a prime award 

of $100 was signed in FY 2017 and the contractor issued 

a $25 sub-award in FY 2017, then the $25 is deducted 

from the prime contractor’s total and added to the 

subcontractor’s figures for FY 2017. In this case, FY 2017 

is the year during which both the prime and sub-awards 

were made. If the contractor issued a subsequent $25 

sub-award in FY 2018, then that $25 was deducted from 

FY 2017 and added to FY 2018. 

It should also be noted that many sub-award records had 

large, erroneous spending amounts that necessitated 

revision or removal from the dataset.

The FY 2018 and FY 2019 

place of performance of sub-awards.

adjust the prime obligations to reflect the year and 

performance). The analysis continues, however, to 

to have activity long after the end of the period of 

data quality concerns (e.g., some contracts appear 

made for the figures in the FY 2019 report due to 

in USAspending.gov. Such adjustments were not 

report reflected the length of each prime contract 

2013 until FY 2017, the Defense Spending by State 

significant change priorfrom reports. From FY

reports contain one

B. Defense Contracts, By Type

This represents the proportion of total prime award

spending in a state or the District of Columbia that went to

four product and service categories: construction; research

and development; services; and supplies and equipment.

The DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy was used

to categorize the spending on the products and services

identified by the product and service code (PSC) listed in

each prime award record. The federal government uses

these codes to identify the products or services that

comprise the majority of spending in a prime award 

contract. Sub-award records do not contain such a code 

or any other product or service identifier. Therefore, subaward spending was categorized by the PSC of the prime 

award against which the sub-award was made.

C. Defense Contracts, By Service

This statistic is the percentage of defense contract

spending in a state or the District of Columbia that was

funded by the Military Services or other DoD activities

in FY 2019. For prime awards, the “Funding Sub Agency

Code” field was used to identify the specific agency that

funded an award. For sub-awards, the Funding Sub Agency

Code listed for the associated prime award identified the

funding agency for the sub-award. All awards identifying

the U.S. Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force

were categorized as “Army,” “Navy/Marines,” and “Air

Force.” All other DoD activities, such as the Defense Health

Agency and Defense Logistics Agency, are categorized as

“Other Defense.”

D. Top Defense Contractors

This list includes the private- and public-sector vendors

that were among the ten biggest recipients of DoD

spending in a state or the District of Columbia during

FY 2019. The researchers used DUNS numbers to

identify both the prime and sub-award contractors.Ф If a

parent company was listed in the contract records, the

researchers applied the parent company’s DUNS number.

If no parent company DUNS number was recorded, the

researchers used the numbers for the individual vendors

or sub-awardees.

E. Contract Awards Performed, By Fiscal Year

These numbers represent total defense contract awards in

a state or the District of Columbia for each fiscal year since

2012. Calculated according to the methodology described

in Section A, these figures include both prime and subawards, and are often different from those listed in

previous versions of this report. These differences reflect

Ϩ

 “DUNS” stands for Data Universal Numbering System, which is proprietary to Dun & Bradstreet, a commercial data company. Dun & Bradstreet uses the system to 

establish business credit files and the numbers correspond to each physical location of a business. The federal government requires all businesses to have a DUNS 

number in order to receive a federal contract or grant (Dun & Bradstreet, “About the D-U-N-S Number”, accessed April ϣϪ, ϤϢϣϪ, https://fedgov.dnb.com/webform/pages/

dunsnumber.jsp).

128 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019
contract modifications (e.g., the addition/reduction of 

funds or an extension of the period of performance) 

that occurred after the data were obtained for the prior 

reports, as well as differences in the methods used to 

assign prime and sub-awards to specific fiscal years. 

F. Defense Personnel

This section refers to the total active duty, civilian, National 

Guard, and Reserve personnel in a state or the District of 

Columbia in FY 2019. Defense payroll figures are the total 

gross pay received by those personnel through FY 2019, 

while personnel counts reflect the levels on September 30, 

2019. These data are from the DoD’s Defense Manpower 

Data Center (DMDC). Readers are cautioned not to 

compare personnel counts from the Defense Spending by 

State FY 2016 report to the FY 2019 report. As was the case 

in the FY 2017 and FY 2018 reports, this report reflects 

DMDC data for all personnel corresponding to a single 

snapshot in time (September 30, 2019) rather than over 

the course of the fiscal year. 

Readers may notice that states with a large Navy/Marine 

presence (e.g., California, Washington, Virginia, and 

South Carolina) appear to have significantly increased 

in personnel and payroll from the FY 2017 version 

of this report. This is due to a change in how DMDC 

counts people. Personnel who previously appeared to 

be assigned to Armed Forces Americas or Armed Forces 

Europe are reported in FY 2018 and FY 2019 in their 

home-port state, but with an APO/FPO zip code of their 

current overseas location. Since APO/FPO zip codes do 

not have counties, their county is unknown, but they are 

included in state totals. 

G. Military Installations

The installations depicted in the maps throughout this 

report are drawn from the DoD’s “Military Installations, 

Ranges, and Training Areas” (MIRTA) dataset. The “MIRTA” 

dataset contains geospatial data (i.e., latitude and 

longitude) on the point locations and boundaries of DoD 

facilities listed in the DoD’s 2015 Base Structure Report. 

The points represent the centers or near-centers of DoD 

sites, and the boundaries comprise federally owned or 

managed land. The point centers were used to infer the 

relevant county name via the Federal Communications 

Commission’s geolocation service, https://geo.fcc.gov/

api/census. The dataset is in a shapefile format, which 

is common for geographic information systems, and 

conforms to the World Geodetic System 1984, a frequently 

used terrestrial reference system referred to as “WGS84.” 

The data are in decimal degrees. Many facilities in the 

“MIRTA” dataset include subordinate sites. For various 

reasons, not all military installations are included.Х

ϩ

 U.S. Department of Defense, “Release Notes: Military Installations, Ranges, and Training Areas (Point Locations and Boundaries),” version ϥ.Ϣ, May ϧ, ϤϢϣϩ, https://

catalog.data.gov/dataset/military-installations-ranges-and-training-areas.

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2019 129

U.S. Department of Defense 

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation 

2231 Crystal Drive, Suite 520, Arlington, VA 22202 

703-697-2130 | www.oea.gov