alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5251 

To suspend temporarily the duty on disperse blue 56. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on disperse blue 56. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DISPERSE BLUE 56. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.58 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 disperse blue 56) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Justin Everett ROSE.

No. 296P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Justin Everett Rose.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by the Attorney General on the 2nd day of June 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Attorney General on the 2nd day of June 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 2nd day of June 2005 by the Attorney General in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
STATE v. HARTGROVE.

No. COA05-66.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Catawba (03CRS9933, 03CRS9934).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Marc L. Reisch,certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Visant Holding Corp. andVisant Corporation;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, and for,the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Eachregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for each such registrant and we have:

 

a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to such registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during thisperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of such registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosedin this report any change in such registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, suchregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Eachregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of such registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect such registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)    Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in such registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: August 16, 2005 | /s/ Marc L. Reisch        |   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                  | Marc L. Reisch            |   |
|                  | *President and*           |   |
|                  | *Chief Executive Officer* |   |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1





STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 (the Form10-Q) of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (the Company), I, Joseph D. Borgerding, President and Chief Executive of the Company,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(a)

the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b)

the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company asof and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q



/s/ Joseph D. Borgerding

Date: November 10, 2005

Joseph D. Borgerding

President and Chief Executive Officer
STETSER v. TAP PHARMACEUTICAL PROD.

No. 142PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Marvin K. Blount, Jr., Marvin K. Blount, III, Greenville, Donald E. Haviland, Jr., TerriAnne Benedetto, Kent Williams, Jonathan Shub, Philadelphia, PA., for Stetser et al.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Raleigh, for Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 28th day of February 2005 by Defendant (Takeda Pharmaceutical Co.) to Seal Selected Portion of Defendant Appellee's Brief:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of March 2005."
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40238-40239]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question 
whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the 
BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors,

[[Page 40239]]

Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than July 21, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (Karen Smith, Director, 
Applications) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Jonesboro Bancshares, Inc., Jonesboro, Louisiana; to engage de 
novo in extending credit and servicing loans pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(1) of the Board's Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-14366 Filed 7-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 520 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

Ponce Inlet Unit P08. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2007 

Mr. FEENEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System Ponce Inlet Unit P08. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN JOHN H. CHAFEE 

4 COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘P08’’, relat6 ing to the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources Sys7 tem unit designated as Coastal Barrier Resources System 

8 Ponce Inlet Unit P08, that is included in the set of maps 

9 entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources Sys10 tem’’ and referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier 


frosa on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 520 IH

1 Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), is hereby replaced by 

2 another map relating to the unit entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee 

3 Coastal Barrier Resources System Ponce Inlet Unit P08’’ 

4 and dated lllll. 

5 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

6 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

7 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

8 the provisions of section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Re9 sources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Æ 


frosa on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1

                   Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350


         In connection with the filing with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission of Ultimate Franchise Systems, Inc.'s (the "Company") Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify (i) in our capacities as officers of the Company, (ii)
to each of our own respective actual knowledge, and (iii) solely for the purpose
of compliance with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements ofss.13(a) or
                  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the final condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

         The above certification is given as of the date of the Report and is
limited to the periods covered by the Report. The above certification is made
severally and not jointly.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate on
December 30, 2002.





                                   ULTIMATE FRANCHISE SYSTEMS, INC.


                                   By:  /s/ Christopher M. Swartz
                                        -------------------------------------
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                   By:  /s/ Michael F. Cronin
                                        -------------------------------------
                                         Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. TAYLOR.

No. COA04-1115.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 7, 2005.

Certification Date June 27, 2005.

Appeal from Carteret (04CRS914, 03CRS52678, 03CRS52679, 03CRS52680, 03CRS52681, 03CRS52685)

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5135 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5135

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, as the ``Sergeant Jamie 
                   O. Maugans Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT JAMIE O. MAUGANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Jamie O. Maugans Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Jamie O. Maugans Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 12, 2008.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5135

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, as the ``Sergeant Jamie 
                   O. Maugans Post Office Building''.
```
HomeOcean Facts

# What is a nautilus? 

## The nautilus is a mollusk that uses jet propulsion to roam the ocean deep.

Writers, artists, and engineers have long marveled at the nautilus’s beauty and swimming abilities.

The  chambered or pearly nautilus is a cephalopod (a type of mollusk)—a distant cousin to squids, octopi, and  cuttlefish. Unlike its color-changing cousins, though, the soft-bodied nautilus  lives inside its hard external shell. The shell itself has many closed interior  chambers or “compartments.”

The  animal resides in the shell’s largest chamber, while the  other chambers function like the ballast tanks of a submarine. This is the  secret to how the nautilus swims.

The  tissue in a canal called the siphuncle [sigh-funk-el] connects all of the interior  chambers. As seawater pumps through the living chamber, the nautilus expels  water by pulling its body into the chamber, thereby creating jet propulsion to  thrust itself backwards and to make turns. While swimming up or down through  the water column, the nautilus uses its siphuncle to suck fluid into, or draw it  out of, the smaller sealed chambers, allowing the animal to adjust its overall  buoyancy.

According  to fossil records, animals similar to the chambered nautilus have existed  for about 500 million years. Although no regulations currently exist to protect  them, the six living species of chambered nautilus appear to be in decline.  They are trapped mostly for their attractive shells and also for the shell’s  inner layer, called nacre, which is used as a pearl substitute in jewelry and  trinkets. In 2013, NOAA Fisheries funded a University of  Washington researcher to conduct population studies of the nautilus in Fiji and  American Samoa. The research should provide a clearer picture  of nautilus abundance in those areas.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - NOAA Fisheries: Nautilus May be in Trouble;  International Research Suggests 
          - Nautilus Research and Images: National Park of American Samoa

Did you know?

The ancient Greeks saw the chambered nautilus shell as a symbol of perfection. The shell can be described mathematically as a logarithmic spiral. 

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5253 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5253

          To suspend temporarily the duty on disperse blue 60.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on disperse blue 60.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE BLUE 60.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.50 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to disperse blue 60) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
SMITH BARNEY PRECIOUS METALS AND MINERALS FUND INC.
                              
                    ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                              
                              
      Smith Barney Precious Metals and Minerals Fund Inc., a
Maryland   corporation  having  its  principal  offices   in
Baltimore    City,   Maryland   (hereinafter   called    the
"Corporation"), hereby certifies to the State Department  of
Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:


       FIRST:     The  Articles  of  Incorporation  of   the
Corporation, as amended, are further amended by changing the
Article containing the name of the Corporation to read:

                            NAME

           The  name of the Corporation (hereinafter  called
the "Corporation") is Smith
          Barney Natural Resources Fund Inc.


      SECOND:   The Corporation is registered as an open-end
investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940.


      THIRD:     The foregoing amendment to the  Charter  of
Incorporation of the Corporation was approved by a  majority
of  the entire Board of Directors of the Corporation and the
amendment  of the Charter of Incorporation is limited  to  a
change  expressly permitted by Section 2-605 of Title  2  of
Subtitle  6 of the Maryland General Corporation  Law  to  be
made without action by the stockholders.

      IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused  this
instrument to be signed in its name and on its behalf by its
Chairman,  Heath B. McLendon, and witnessed by its Assistant
Secretary, Caren Cunningham, as of the 18th day of December,
1995.

       The   undersigned  acknowledges  these  Articles   of
Amendment  to  be  the corporate act of the Corporation  and
states   that,  to  the  best  of  his  or  her   knowledge,
information  and  belief, the matters and  facts  set  forth
therein  with  respect  to  the authorization  and  approval
thereof  are  true in all material respects  and  that  this
statement is made under all penalties of perjury.


WITNESS:                       Smith Barney Precious  Metals
and
                                 Minerals Fund Inc.


/s/Caren Cunningham                By:/s/Heath B. McLendon
Caren Cunningham                        Heath B. McLendon
Assistant Secretary                          Chairman of the
Board
Long LE, Ha Duong and Emily Le v. WAKE MEDICAL CENTER, Michael Smith, Edgar Garrabrant, III, Courtney Sherev, Kendra Graham, S. Hantar, Brittany Johnson, Kathy Bryant, an Unknown Male Neonatalologist, an Unknown Triage Female Nurse.

No. 556A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Long L. Le, Pro Se.

David D. Ward, Samuel G. Thompson, Renee B. Crawford, Raleigh, for Wake Medical Center, et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiff on the 27th day of October 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motions to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by Defendants (Wake Medical Center, Courtney Sherev, Kendra Graham, Brittany Johnson, Kathy Bryant, Edgar Garrabrant, III, M.D., Scott Hunter, CRNA and Michael D. Smith, M.D.), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motions to dismiss the appeal are

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."