alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration [Docket Nos. FDA-2012-N-0280 and FDA-2021-N-0371]
 AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Health and Human Services (HHS).
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of information collections that have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: JonnaLynn Capezzuto, Office of Operations, Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601 Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-796-3794, 
                        *PRAStaff@fda.hhs.gov.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a list of FDA information collections recently approved by OMB under section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507). The OMB control number and expiration date of OMB approval for each information collection are shown in table 1. Copies of the supporting statements for the information collections are available on the internet at 
                    *https://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*
                     An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. Table 1—List of Information Collections Approved By OMB
Title of collection
OMB control No.
Date approval expiresFinancial Disclosure by Clinical Investigators
0910-0396
5/31/2025Accelerated Approval Disclosures on Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Websites
0910-0872
5/31/2025Infant Formula Enforcement Discretion Policy
0910-0903
11/30/2022
 Dated: June 29, 2022. Lauren K. Roth, Associate Commissioner for Policy.


[FR Doc. 2022-14358 Filed 7-5-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony L. DAVIS.

No. 290P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Anthony L. Davis, Pro Se.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, Belinda J. Foster, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 31st day of May 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
<PAGE>
10.24(c)


                                   AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
              MILLENNIUM CHEMICALS INC. LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

        WHEREAS, Millennium Chemicals Inc. (the "Company") maintains the
Millennium Chemicals Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (effective as of October 1,
1995) (the "Plan");

        WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 22 of the Plan, the Board of Directors
of the Company (the "Board") reserves the right to amend the Plan;

        WHEREAS, the Board previously approved the "Termination Amendment" to
the Plan effective as of October 23, 1997 (the "Termination Amendment"); and

        WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan;

        NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of January 1, 1998, the Plan is amended as
follows:

        1. Section 3 of the Termination Amendment of the Plan is amended by
adding the following sentence to the end thereof:

    Other than with respect to any participant in the 1996 Millennium
    Petrochemicals Inc. Plan, in lieu of any Award being distributed to a
    Participant pursuant to the previous sentence of this Section 3, a
    Participant may elect to have all or any part of such Award deferred under
    the Millennium Chemicals Inc. Salary and Bonus Deferral Plan and be subject
    to the terms of such plan (the "Deferred Award"); provided, however, that
    such Deferred Award shall continue to be subject to the forfeiture
    provisions of Section 11 of the Plan.

        2. In all other respects, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this amendment has been executed the 23rd day of
January, 1998.

                                         MILLENNIUM CHEMICALS INC.


                                         By: [ILLEGIBLE]
                                            ------------------------------------
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5137 

To ensure that hunting remains a purpose of the New River Gorge National 

River. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 28, 2008 

Mr. RAHALL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To ensure that hunting remains a purpose of the New River 

Gorge National River. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HUNTING IN NEW RIVER GORGE NATIONAL 

4 RIVER. 

5 Section 1106 of the National Parks and Recreation 

6 Act of 1978 (16 U.S.C. 460m–20) is amended in the first 

7 sentence by striking ‘‘may’’ and inserting ‘‘shall’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings Instituting Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:*                     RP22-992-000.                

*Applicants:*                     Midwestern Gas Transmission Company.                

*Description:*                     § 4(d) Rate Filing: Revisions for Pre-Arranged Deals and Expansion/Extension Projects to be effective 7/25/2022.                

*Filed Date:*                     6/24/22.                

*Accession Number:*                     20220624-5144.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. ET 7/6/22.                

                    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's                           ( print page 39818)                        Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.                

                    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (                    *https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.                

                    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.*                     For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Dated: June 27, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-14173 Filed 7-1-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
U.S. Office of Special Counsel

1730 M Street NW, Suite 218

Washington, DC 20036-4505

certification@osc.gov

U.S. Office of Special Counsel’s 

Annual Certification Checklist

The U.S. Office of Special Counsel's (OSC) Certification Program allows federal agencies to 

meet the statutory obligations of 5 U.S.C. § 2302(c), the Dr. Chris Kirkpatrick Whistleblower 

Protection Act, and the Office of Special Counsel Reauthorization Act of 2017. In addition to 

the existing requirements of the program, these statutes require agency heads to ensure that 

their employees receive yearly information about whistleblower protection laws and to provide 

annual supervisory training on how to respond to complaints involving whistleblower 

protections. Certified agencies must complete this checklist each year to ensure their 

compliance with ongoing and new annual requirements. The completed checklist should be 

emailed to certification@osc.gov. Questions about completing this form should be directed to 

OSC’s Diversity, Outreach, and Training Unit, which can be reached at certification@osc.gov.

General Information

Agency or Office Completing Checklist:

Agency and OIG ☐

Agency ☐

OIG ☐

Component (please indicate parent agency)

Contact Information

Please provide the contact information for the official responsible for implementing OSC's 

Certification Program (the individual’s name and phone number will be placed on OSC’s 

website as the point of contact once the agency is certified).

Name:

Title:

Email:

Phone:

Address (to send certificate):
 

X

Requirement Checklist Information

☐1. Verified that the agency has the most current OSC posters on display throughout 

the agency

☐2. Confirmed that new employees received information on PPPs and whistleblower 

disclosures within 180 days of employment (OSC handouts)

☐3. Disseminated (by head of agency or designee) annual notification to all 

employees emphasizing the importance of whistleblower protection laws and 

including links to educational information on PPPs and whistleblower disclosures 

(OSC handouts)

☐4. Trained supervisors on how to respond to complaints alleging a violation of 

whistleblower protections (OSC in-person or virtual training or PowerPoint 

presentation)

☐5. Checked the links to OSC’s website on both the agency’s website and intranet

☐6. Ensured that the agency has identified means for disclosing classified 

information or information prohibited from release by law to the: (I) Special Counsel; 

(II) the Inspector General of an agency; (III) Congress; or (IV) another employee of 

the agency who is designated to receive such disclosures.

Comments (optional): 

Confirmation of Completion

Signature of official responsible for 

implementing OSC’s Certification 

Program:
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Marc L. Reisch           
|                        |  |  |  | Marc L. Reisch               
|                        |  |  |  | President and                
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                        |  |  |  | (principal executive officer)
STATE v. Alden Jerome HARDEN.

No. 427A94-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 15, 2005.

Jill Ledford Cheek, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of July 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File and Serve the Petition for Writ of Certiorari:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Alden Jerome Harden) shall have up to and including the 8th day of September 2005 to file and serve his/her Petition for Writ of Certiorari with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 15th day of July 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10-K FOR
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENT.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,611
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,171
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,483<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,688
<PP&E>                                          16,046
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,427
<BONDS>                                         13,300<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,736
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,463
<SALES>                                         29,388
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,388
<CGS>                                           26,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,309<F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,362)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,362)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,362)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS IN EXCESS OF BILLINGS.
<F2>REPRESENTS OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASES AND LONG-TERM DEBT.
<F3>INCLUDES PROJECT COSTS AND OPERATING EXPENSES.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Thomas FONTANA, Libellant-Appellant, v. GRACE LINE, Inc. and States Marine Corporation, Respondents, and Huron *Stevedoring*Corporation, Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Jersey Contracting Corporation, Roslyn Scow Corporation, and Penn Stevedoring Corporation, Respondents-Impleaded, and Huron Stevedoring Corporation, Intervenor-Appellee.

No. 254, Docket 22671.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued June 2, 1953.

Decided June 22, 1953.

Nathan Baker, New York City, Bernard Chazen, Hoboken, N. J., on the brief, for libellant-appellant.

Kirlin Campbell & Keating, New York City, Thomas Coyne and Vernon Sims Jones, New York City, of counsel, for intervenor-appellee.

Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed on opinion below, 106 F.Supp. *461.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5168 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 845
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5168

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 2, 2008

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             June 25, 2008

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, as the ``Cody Grater 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CODY GRATER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Cody Grater Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cody 
Grater Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 845

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 5168

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, as the ``Cody Grater 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 25, 2008

                       Reported without amendment
```
114 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Northrop Grumman $243.9 M

Boeing $33.0 M

Leidos $21.8 M

Aero International $21.3 M

4D Tech Solutions Inc. $5.7 M

Rockwell Collins $4.5 M

Electronic Warfare Associates $4.3 M

United Technologies $4.2 M

Parsons Corp. $4.2 M

Cooper Materials Handling Inc. $4.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

WEST VIRGINIA

#44 #44 0.2% $438 #45 #45 #48

$0.8 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.0% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

10,370 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$328.0 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

10,370

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Kanawha 16 437 1,589 424 2,466

Berkeley ND 297 1,185 33

Wood ND 62 333 197

Putnam ND 123 451 17

Preston ND 63 385 67

Ohio ND 73 104 317

Cabell 25 450 ND ND

Wayne ND 34 316 91

Fayette ND 13 377 ND

Monongalia 16 11 125 153 305

Service: 22%

Supplies and

Equipment: 75%

Construction: 1%

Research and

Development: 3%

Active Duty: 1%

Civilian: 18%

National Guard: 61%

Reserve: 20%

46%

33%

7%

14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

72%

2%

26%

0%

$0.2 $0.3

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2

$0.4

$0.5

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 115

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Ohio

Monongalia

Mineral

Marion Berkeley

Harrison Jefferson

Wood

Greenbrier

WEST VIRGINIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Mineral

Harrison

Marion

Jefferson

Greenbrier

Kanawha

Wood

Monongalia

Berkeley

Ohio

(M = millions)

$266.3 M

$38.3 M

$30.0 M

$21.3 M

$20.2 M

$17.1 M

$14.0 M

$10.2 M

$9.1 M

$5.9 M

Kanawha

Berkeley

Cabell

Putnam

Preston

Wood

Wayne

Ohio

Monongalia

Harrison

$96.8 M

$47.8 M

$38.1 M

$17.6 M

$16.1 M

$13.7 M

$11.0 M

$10.2 M

$9.7 M

$8.6 M

Preston

Putnam

Cabell

Wayne

Wood

Monongalia Berkeley

Harrison

Ohio

Kanawha

Kanawha