alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert JOHNSON, Jr.

No. 419P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Daniel Shatz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Robert Johnson, Jr.

Francis Crawley, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 9th day of August 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of August 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**TELANETIX,
      INC.**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Telanetix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Thomas A. Szabo,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November
                14, 2007
            
            /s/
                  Thomas A. SzaboThomas
                A. SzaboChief
                Executive Officer
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.2.1



SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR THE
COMPANY'S NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS






On May, 22 2019, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of EMC Insurance Group Inc. (the "Company") approved the terms of compensation to be paid to non-employee directors for the ensuing year, effective as of May 22, 2019 (the date of the Company's board meeting).  Compensation for non-employee directors includes an annual retainer of $75,000, board and committee meeting attendance fees of $2,500 per meeting, and reimbursement of travel and business expenses.  In addition, the chair of the Board of Directors shall receive an annual fee of $22,000, the chair of the audit committee shall receive an annual fee of $18,000, the chairs of all other board committees shall receive an annual fee of $5,000, and the chairs of each board committee shall receive an additional $1,000 committee meeting fee for each meeting at which such director serves as chair.  Non-employee directors are also entitled to receive $1,000 ($1,500 for the chair of the audit committee) for each special audit committee meeting held primarily for the purpose of considering revisions to the Company's non-GAAP operating income guidance for the year, $2,500 and reimbursement of travel and business expense for each day that they attend an approved educational program or seminar, $2,500 for each webinar and similar computer-based educational program attended lasting more than two hours, and $250 for each webinar and similar computer-based educational program attended lasting two hours or less.  


The non-employee directors are also eligible to participate in Employers Mutual Casualty Company’s Non-Employee Director Stock Purchase Plan, though this plan is currently suspended pending the outcome of the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Merger Agreement") between the Company, Employers Mutual, and Oak Merger Sub, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Employers Mutual.  Under this plan, directors are allowed to purchase the Company’s common stock in an amount up to 100 percent of their annual retainer at a price equal to 75 percent of the fair market value of the common stock on the purchase date.


Due to the pending Merger Agreement, the non-employee director compensation in the forms of the annual retainer and the Board and various committee chair compensation shall be prorated monthly based on the number of months a director continues to serve on the Board.  Accordingly, such amounts shall be paid in twelve equal monthly installments beginning on May 23, 2019 and continuing on the 23rd day of each month thereafter; provided, however, that no further monthly payments shall be due and payable after a director resigns from his or her position on the Board; and provided further that once made, a monthly installment payment shall not be subject to forfeiture if a director resigns his or her position prior to the next monthly installment payment.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed September 18, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-0179

Lower Tribunal No. 19-5257

________________

Thomas Wilson,

Appellant,

vs.

In Re: Estate of Peter Loftin,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jorge E. 

Cueto, Judge.

GrayRobinson, P.A., and Jack R. Reiter and Sydney Feldman 

D'Angelo, for appellant.

Damian | Valori | Culmo, and Russell Landy and Christopher Perse, for 

appellee Jorian Loftin.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Thomas Wilson appeals two orders granting Jorian Loftin’s (“Jorian”) 
2

counsel’s petition for payment of Class 1 Administrative Expenses, which 

found Wilson lacked standing to object to the petition. We reverse, finding 

Wilson had standing to object to the petition as co-trustee of a revocable trust 

that is the residuary beneficiary of the estate. “Section 733.6171(5) of the 

Probate Code, which governs the compensation of attorneys for the personal 

representative, confers standing to object to a fee request upon an 

‘interested person’ . . . .” Duff-Esformes v. Mukamal, 332 So. 3d 17, 19 (Fla. 

3d DCA 2021) (citing § 733.6171(5), Fla. Stat. (2021)). An “interested 

person” is defined as “any person who may reasonably be expected to be 

affected by the outcome of the particular proceeding involved” and as the 

trustee of a trust in any proceeding affecting the expenses of the 

administration of a decedent’s estate. § 731.201(23), Fla. Stat. (2022). We 

conclude, based on the plain language of statues, that Wilson had standing 

as co-trustee to object to the petition for attorney’s fees and costs filed by 

Jorian’s counsel. However, we find Wilson’s objection is limited to the 

reasonableness of the fees sought, as the parties entered into an agreement 

that provides that all parties agreed to the entitlement of fees. See Harley v. 

Lopez, 784 So. 2d 447, 448 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (stating that where appellant 

had agreed in writing other party was entitled to attorney’s fees, question 

before trial court “was not whether such fees and costs would be awarded, 
3

but only what amount would constitute ‘reasonable’ costs and fees”).

Reversed and remanded.
INTERNATIONAL FOOD PRODUCTS GROUP, INC.
                     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of International Food Products Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Joseph R. Rodriguez, Jr., Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.



/s/ Joseph R. Rodriguez, Jr.
---------------------------------------
Joseph R. Rodriguez, Jr.
Principal  Financial  Officer
May 6, 2005

     A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided  to  International Food Products Group, Inc. and will be retained
by International Food Products Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or  its  staff  upon  request.
STATE v. LITTLE.

No. COA04-1559.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Beaufort (03CRS51655, 03CRS3552)

Case reported without published opinion No error.
SCOTT v. FAIRBANKS CAPITAL CORP.

No. COA05-372

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed November 1, 2005

Certification Date November 21, 2005

Appeal from Cabarrus (04CVS309).

Cases reported without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
----

| Subsidiaries                  - Direct/Wholly-owned                                                                    |   | State                  of Incorporation |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                   |   |                                    |
| Appalachian                  Capital Trust I                                                                           |   | Delaware                                |
|                                                                                                                   |   |                                    |
| Appalachian                  Community Bank                                                                            |   |                                    |
| Also                  doing business under the registered trade name “Gilmer County                  Bank” |   | Georgia                                 |
|                                                                                                                   |   |                                    |
|                                                                                                                   |   |                                    |
| Subsidiaries                  - Indirect/wholly-owned by Appalachian Community Bank                                    |   |                                    |
|                                                                                                                   |   |                                    |
| Appalachian                  Information Management, Inc.                                                              |   | Georgia                                 |
FAKHOURY v. FAKHOURY.

No. 441P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Victoria Bender, Raleigh, for Kimberly Fakhoury.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of September 2005 by Defendant to Withdraw Petition:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of October 2005."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5438 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5438

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility in Tafuna, 
   American Samoa, as the ``Fuga Tolani Teleso Satele Department of 
                  Veterans Affairs Medical Facility''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2008

 Mr. Faleomavaega introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To name the Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility in Tafuna, 
   American Samoa, as the ``Fuga Tolani Teleso Satele Department of 
                  Veterans Affairs Medical Facility''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL FACILITY, 
              TAFUNA, AMERICAN SAMOA.

    The Department of Veterans Affairs medical facility in Tafuna, 
American Samoa, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be 
known and designated as the ``Fuga Tolani Teleso Satele Department of 
Veterans Affairs Medical Facility''. Any reference to such medical 
facility in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or other paper 
of the United States shall be considered to be a reference to the Fuga 
Tolani Teleso Satele Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Facility.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-126-CV

IN RE THEODIS DODSON, JR.	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL  B:  GARDNER, LIVINGSTON, and HOLMAN, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  April 4, 2008
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2
CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. SUCH IDENTIFIED INFORMATION HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THIS EXHIBIT BECAUSE IT IS (I) NOT MATERIAL AND (II) WOULD LIKELY CAUSE COMPETITIVE HARM TO THE COMPANY IF DISCLOSED.





First Amendment to Dispensing Agreement


This First Amendment to the July 26, 2018 Dispensing Agreement (“Agreement”) between Vericel Corporation and AllCare Plus Pharmacy (“AllCare”) shall be effective as of May 1, 2019 (“Effective Date”).


RECITALS


WHEREAS, Vericel and AllCare are Parties to the Agreement; 


WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement; 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of good and valuable consideration, the Parties hereby agree to modify the Agreement as follows


		
	1.
	The Parties agree to modify Section 7.1, Term, by replacing the first sentence to the following: “The term of this Agreement shall continue until May 15, 2022 (“Term”), unless otherwise terminated pursuant to this Agreement.”




		
	2.
	The Parties agree to replace Section 2(A) of Exhibit A to the Agreement with “Vericel shall pay AllCare $[***] for each Patient to whom Product is dispensed. If a customer receives more than one Product within the same order, AllCare shall receive $[***].”




		
	3.
	The Parties agree that all other conditions of the Agreement shall remain in force and that such terms shall prevail in the event of a conflict with this First Amendment. 






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment, by their duly authorized representatives, as of the Effective Date.
	
		
	



VERICEL CORPORATION
	



ALLCARE PLUS PHARMACY

	



/s/ Daniel Orlando
Dan Orlando, Chief Operating Officer    



	



/s/ Daniel Apelian
President & CEO
STATE of North Carolina v. Hunter Jerome HARRIS.

No. 454P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Irving Joyner, Durham, for Hunter Jerome Harris.

Patricia A. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of August 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
76 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

NEW HAMPSHIRE 

#38 

$2.3 B SPENT IN 

#21

2.3% OF STATE GDP

0.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,671

PER RESIDENT 

#33 

$2.0 B CONTRACT 

#50

6,298 NUMBER OF 

#50

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 67%

By Service 

Army

Research and

Development: 11%

Service: 21%

19%

Navy/Marines

28%

Air Force

39%

Other Defense

15%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 21% Active Duty: 19%

Civilian: 17%

National Guard: 44%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

49%

Navy/Marines

25%

Air Force

23%

Other Defense

3%

Top Defense Contractors 

BAE Systems

L3Harris Technologies

Methuen Construction

Renco Corp.

Elbit Systems

Amphenol Corp.

CDM/Cape A, JV

L & C Protec, Inc.

Solid State Scientific Corp.

Haigh-Farr, Inc.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.1 B

$102.9 M

$62.6 M

$48.1 M

$43.0 M

$41.7 M

$25.3 M

$23.1 M

$21.6 M

$20.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.6 $2.3

FY18

$2.1

FY19

$2.0

$1.6

$1.1 $1.1 $1.0

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY20 FY21

$311.2 MILLION 6,298

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Rockingham 302 420 1,136

Merrimack ND 200 742

Hillsborough 57 183 633

Strafford 14 18 129

Grafton ND 238 120

Cheshire ND ND 0

Belknap 0 ND 0

Carroll ND ND 0

Sullivan 0 ND 0

Reserve

1,014

ND

ND

243

0

37

0

0

0

Total

2,872

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

404
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NEW HAMPSHIRE FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

Hillsborough

Rockingham

Grafton

Coos

Sullivan

Strafford

Cheshire

Belknap

Merrimack

Carroll

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$1.4 B

$356.9 M

$67.7 M

$48.8 M

$27.9 M

$17.5 M

$16.8 M

$13.0 M

$4.7 M

$25.1 K

Rockingham

Merrimack

Hillsborough

Grafton

Strafford

Cheshire

Belknap

Sullivan

Carroll

$121.5 M

$49.2 M

$44.7 M

$24.3 M

$9.3 M 

$1.2 M

$247.9 K

$78.1 K

$41.8 K

Coos

Grafton

Carroll

Belknap

Merrimack

Rockingham

Cheshire

Sullivan Strafford

Hillsborough

Grafton

Carroll

Belknap

Merrimack

Rockingham

Cheshire

Sullivan Strafford

Hillsborough

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 7

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

7
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Six, Inc., (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of June 30, 2004, and for the period then ended.



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ Bryan Peery         
|Bryan Peery             
|Chief Accounting Officer



August 4, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 129 (Thursday, July 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40559-40560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14477]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: July 7, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
July 1, 2022, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Contract 751 to Competitive Product List. 
Documents

[[Page 40560]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2022-77, CP2022-83.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2022-14477 Filed 7-6-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
In the Matter of K.B.B. and K.A.B.

No. 179P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Richard E. Jester, for Shannon Tomica Burkes.

Lynne G. Schiftan, Deputy County Attorney, for Dept. of Social Services.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 1st day of April 2005 by Respondent (Shannon B.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent (Shannon B.) on the 27th day of April 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION BY OFFICER





I, John Climaco, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2021 of CNS Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: April 29, 2022 | By: | /s/    John Climaco                  
|-------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------
|                     |     | John Climaco                         
|                     |     | Chief Executive Officer and President