Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40503 

1See Phosphor Copper From the Republic of 

Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 82 FR 18893 

(April 24, 2017) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Review, 87 

FR 11416 (March 1, 2022) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, 

‘‘Phosphorous Copper from Korea: Notice of Intent 

to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated March 8, 

2022. 

4 Id. at 2. 

5See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, 

‘‘Phosphorous Copper from Korea: Substantive 

Response to the Notice of Initiation of Sunset 

Review,’’ March 24, 2022. 

6See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on March 1, 2022,’’ dated April 20, 2022. 

7A ‘‘master alloy’’ is a base metal, such as copper, 

to which a relatively high percentage of one or two 

other elements is added. 

8See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the First 

Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Phosphor Copper from Korea,’’ dated 

concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this 

notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 8362. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 24, 2017, Commerce 

published the AD order on phosphor 

copper from Korea.1 On March 1, 2022, 

Commerce published the Initiation 

Notice of the first sunset review of the 

Order, pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).2 On March 8, 2022, Commerce 

received a notice of intent to participate 

in the sunset review from Metallurgical 

Products Company (the domestic 

interested party), filed in proper form, 

within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic 

interested party claimed interested party 

status pursuant to section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act as a manufacturer in the United 

States of the domestic like product.4

On March 24, 2022, the domestic 

interested party filed a complete 

substantive response within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i).5 Commerce did not 

receive a substantive response from any 

respondent interested party with respect 

to this proceeding. Further, no hearing 

was requested. On April 20, 2022, 

Commerce notified the U.S. 

International Trade Commission of the 

lack of a substantive response.6 As a 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is master alloys 7 of copper 

containing between five percent and 17 

percent phosphorus by nominal weight, 

regardless of form (including but not 

limited to shot, pellet, waffle, ingot, or 

nugget), and regardless of size or weight. 

Subject merchandise consists 

predominantly of copper (by weight), 

and may contain other elements, 

including but not limited to iron (Fe), 

lead (Pb), or tin (Sn), in small amounts 

(up to one percent by nominal weight). 

Phosphor copper is frequently produced 

to JIS H2501 and ASTM B–644, Alloy 

3A standards or higher; however, 

merchandise covered by the order 

includes all phosphor copper, regardless 

of whether the merchandise meets, fails 

to meet, or exceeds these standards. 

Merchandise covered by the Order is 

currently classified in the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS) under subheading 

7405.00.1000. This HTSUS subheading 

is provided for convenience and 

customs purposes; the written 

description of the scope of the Order is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the accompanying 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.8 A 

list of the topics discussed in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is attached 

as the appendix to this notice. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce 

determines that revocation of the Order 

would be likely to lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping, and that the 

magnitude of the weighted-average 

dumping margin likely to prevail is up 

to 8.43 percent. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a). Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results and notice in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(5)(ii). 

Dated: June 29, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of Dumping 

2. Magnitude of the Margin of Dumping 

Likely to Prevail 

VII. Final Results of Expedited Sunset 

Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–14417 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–840] 

Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

From India: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

producers and/or exporters of certain 

frozen warmwater shrimp (shrimp) from 

India made sales at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR) 

February 1, 2020, through January 31, 

2021. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Terre Keaton Stefanova or Adam 

Simons, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1280 or 

(202) 482–6172, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
40504 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

1See Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from 

India: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021, 87 FR 11413 

(March 1, 2022) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

(PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2020– 

2021 Administrative Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from India,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

3See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from India, 70 FR 5147 (February 1, 2005) (Order). 

4For a complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the PDM. 

5See Commerce’s Letters, In-Lieu of On-Site 

Verification Questionnaires, dated March 28, 2022; 

see also LNSK’s Letter, ‘‘LNSK Green House Agro 

Products LLP Response to Questionnaire in lieu of 

Verification,’’ dated April 6, 2022; and Royal’s 

Letter, ‘‘Royal Imports and Exports’ Response to 

Questionnaire in lieu of Verification,’’ dated April 

6, 2022. 

6Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the allothers rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins established for exporters and 

producers individually examined, excluding any 

margins that are zero or de minimis margins, and 

any margins determined entirely {on the basis of 

facts available}.’’ Because the margin calculated for 

LNSK is zero, we have assigned a dumping margin 

to these companies based on the rate calculated for 

Royal. 

7For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003). 

8See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp 

from India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 83 FR 32835 

(July 16, 2018). 

9See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 

Background 

This review covers 163 producers 

and/or exporters of the subject 

merchandise. Commerce selected two 

mandatory respondents for individual 

examination: LNSK Green House Agro 

Products LLP (LNSK) and Royal Imports 

and Exports (Royal). The producers/ 

exporters not selected for individual 

examination are listed in Appendix II. 

On March 1, 2022, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results and 

invited interested parties to comment.1

For a complete description of the events 

that occurred since the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.2

Scope of the Order 3

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is certain frozen warmwater shrimp. 

The product is currently classified 

under the following Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

item numbers: 0306.17.00.03, 

0306.17.00.04, 0306.17.00.05, 

0306.17.00.06, 0306.17.00.07, 

0306.17.00.08, 0306.17.00.09, 

0306.17.00.10, 0306.17.00.11, 

0306.17.00.12, 0306.17.00.13, 

0306.17.00.14, 0306.17.00.15, 

0306.17.00.16, 0306.17.00.17, 

0306.17.00.18, 0306.17.00.19, 

0306.17.00.20, 0306.17.00.21, 

0306.17.00.22, 0306.17.00.23, 

0306.17.00.24, 0306.17.00.25, 

0306.17.00.26, 0306.17.00.27, 

0306.17.00.28, 0306.17.00.29, 

0306.17.00.40, 0306.17.00.41, 

0306.17.00.42, 1605.21.10.30, and 

1605.29.10.10. Although the HTSUS 

numbers are provided for convenience 

and for customs purposes, the written 

product description remains 

dispositive.4

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are listed in Appendix I 

to this notice and addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. The 

Issues and Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Verification 

Commerce was unable to conduct onsite verification of the information 

relied upon for the final results of this 

review. However, we took additional 

steps in lieu of an on-site verification to 

verify this information, in accordance 

with section 782(i) of the Act.5

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on the comments received from 

interested parties, we made no changes 

to our margin calculations in the 

Preliminary Results. 

Final Results of the Review 

As a result of this review, we 

determine the following weightedaverage dumping margins for the period 

February 1, 2020, through January 31, 

2021: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

LNSK Green House Agro Products LLP .................................. 0.00 

Royal Imports and Exports ......... 3.01 

Companies Not Selected for Individual Review 6 ..................... 3.01 

Review-Specific Rate for Companies 

Not Selected for Individual Review 

The exporters or producers not 

selected for individual review are listed 

in Appendix II. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce has determined, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with the 

final results of this review. 

Persuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

because LNSK and Royal reported the 

entered value for their U.S. sales, we 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of antidumping 

duties calculated for the examined sales 

to the total entered value of the sales for 

which entered value was reported. 

Where either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific 

rate is zero or de minimis, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. 

Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ 

practice will apply to entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by LNSK or Royal for which the 

reviewed companies did not know that 

the merchandise they sold to the 

intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading 

company, or exporter) was destined for 

the United States. In such instances, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

if there is no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction.7

For the companies that were not 

selected for individual review, we 

assigned an assessment rate based on 

the review-specific rate, calculated as 

noted in the ‘‘Final Results of the 

Review’’ section, above.8 The final 

results of this review shall be the basis 

for the assessment of antidumping 

duties on entries of merchandise 

covered by the final results of this 

review and for future deposits of 

estimated duties, where applicable.9

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40505 

10See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order, 70 FR 5147, 5148 (February 1, 2005). 

11Shrimp produced and exported by Devi Sea 

Foods Limited (Devi) was excluded from the order 

effective February 1, 2009. See Certain Frozen 

Warmwater Shrimp from India: Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial 

Rescission of Review, and Notice of Revocation of 

Order in Part, 75 FR 41813, 41814 (July 19, 2010). 

Accordingly, we initiated this administrative 

review with respect to Devi only for shrimp 

produced in India where Devi acted as either the 

manufacturer or exporter (but not both). 

12We incorrectly listed this company as ‘‘Kay 

Exports’’ in Appendix II of the Preliminary Results. 

See Preliminary Results, 87 FR at 11415. 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rates for the reviewed 

companies will be the rates shown 

above, except if the rate is less than 0.50 

percent (de minimis within the meaning 

of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1)), the cash 

deposit will be zero; (2) for previously 

reviewed or investigated companies not 

listed above, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recent period; (3) 

if the exporter is not a firm covered in 

this review, a previous review, or the 

less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the rate 

established for the most recent period 

for the manufacturer of the 

merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit 

rate for all-other manufacturers or 

exporters will continue to be 10.17 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.10 These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: June 29, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Discussion of the Issues General 

Comments 

Comment 1: Differential Pricing Analysis 

Comment 2: Excluding Window Period 

Sales from the Constructed Value (CV) 

Profit Calculation for Royal 

Comment 3: Excluding a Certain Control 

Number (CONNUM) from the Price-toPrice Comparisons for Royal 

IV. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Review-Specific Rate Applicable to 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review 

1. Abad Fisheries 

2. Accelerated Freeze Drying Co. 

3. ADF Foods Ltd. 

4. Albys Agro Private Limited 

5. Al-Hassan Overseas Private Limited 

6. Allana Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd. 

7. Allanasons Ltd. 

8. Alps Ice & Cold Storage Private Limited 

9. Amarsagar Seafoods Private Limited 

10. Amulya Seafoods 

11. Anantha Seafoods Private Limited 

12. Anjaneya Seafoods 

13. Asvini Agro Exports 

14. Ayshwarya Seafood Private Limited 

15. B R Traders 

16. Baby Marine Eastern Exports 

17. Baby Marine Exports 

18. Baby Marine International 

19. Baby Marine Sarass 

20. Baby Marine Ventures 

21. Balasore Marine Exports Private Limited 

22. BB Estates & Exports Private Limited 

23. Bell Exim Private Limited 

24. Bhatsons Aquatic Products 

25. Bhavani Seafoods 

26. Bijaya Marine Products 

27. Blue Fin Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd. 

28. Blue Water Foods & Exports P. Ltd. 

29. Bluepark Seafoods Pvt. Ltd. 

30. Britto Seafood Exports Pvt Ltd. 

31. Calcutta Seafoods Pvt. Ltd./Bay Seafood 

Pvt. Ltd./Elque & Co. 

32. Canaan Marine Products 

33. Capithan Exporting Co. 

34. Cargomar Private Limited 

35. Chakri Fisheries Private Limited 

36. Chemmeens (Regd) 

37. Cherukattu Industries (Marine Div) 

38. Cochin Frozen Food Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

39. Continental Fisheries India Private 

Limited 

40. Coreline Exports 

41. Corlim Marine Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

42. CPF (India) Private Limited 

43. Crystal Sea Foods Private Limited 

44. Danica Aqua Exports Private Limited 

45. Datla Sea Foods 

46. Delsea Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

47. Devi Sea Foods Limited 11

48. Empire Industries Limited 

49. Entel Food Products Private Limited 

50. Esmario Export Enterprises 

51. Everblue Sea Foods Private Limited 

52. Febin Marine Foods Private Limited 

53. Fedora Sea Foods Private Limited 

54. Food Products Pvt., Ltd./Parayil Food 

Products Private Limited 

55. Fouress Food Products Private Limited 

56. Frontline Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

57. G A Randerian Ltd. 

58. Gadre Marine Exports (AKA Gadre 

Marine Exports Pvt. Ltd.) 

59. Galaxy Maritech Exports P. Ltd. 

60. Geo Aquatic Products (P) Ltd. 

61. Godavari Mega Aqua Food Park Private 

Limited 

62. Grandtrust Overseas (P) Ltd. 

63. GVR Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

64. Hari Marine Private Limited 

65. Haripriya Marine Export Pvt. Ltd. 

66. HIC ABF Special Foods Pvt. Ltd. 

67. Hiravati Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

68. Hiravati International Pvt. Ltd. 

69. Hiravati Marine Products Private Limited 

70. HMG Industries Limited 

71. HN Indigos Private Limited 

72. Hyson Exports Private Limited 

73. Indian Aquatic Products 

74. Indo Aquatics 

75. Indo Fisheries 

76. Indo French Shellfish Company Private 

Limited 

77. International Freezefish Exports 

78. Jinny Marine Traders 

79. K.V. Marine Exports 

80. Karunya Marine Exports Private Limited 

81. Kaushalya Aqua Marine Product Exports 

Pvt. Ltd. 

82. Kay Exports 12

83. Kings Marine Products 

84. Koluthara Exports Ltd. 

85. Libran Foods 

86. Mangala Sea Products 

87. Marine Harvest India 

88. Megaa Moda Pvt. Ltd. 

89. Milsha Agro Exports Private Limited 

90. Milsha Sea Product 

91. Minaxi Fisheries Private Limited 

92. Mindhola Foods LLP 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
40506 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

1See Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from the 

People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty 

Order, 82 FR 16166 (April 3, 2017) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87 

FR 11416 (March 1, 2022). 

3See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from 

China—Domestic Interested Parties’ Notice of Intent 

to Participate,’’ dated March 15, 2022. 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from 

China—Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive 

Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated March 30, 

2022. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

93. MMC Exports Limited 

94. MTR Foods 

95. Naik Frozen Foods Private Limited 

96. Naik Oceanic Exports Pvt. Ltd./Rafiq Naik 

Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

97. Naik Seafoods Limited 

98. NAS Fisheries Pvt. Ltd. 

99. Nine Up Frozen Foods 

100. NK Marine Exports LLP 

101. Nutrient Marine Foods Limited 

102. Oceanic Edibles International Limited 

103. Paragon Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd. 

104. Paramount Seafoods 

105. Pesca Marine Products Pvt., Ltd. 

106. Pijikay International Exports P Ltd. 

107. Pravesh Seafood Private Limited 

108. Premier Exports International 

109. Premier Marine Foods 

110. Premier Seafoods Exim (P) Ltd. 

111. Raju Exports 

112. Raunaq Ice & Cold Storage 

113. RDR Exports 

114. RF Exports Private Limited 

115. Riyarchita Agro Farming Private Limited 

116. Rupsha Fish Private Limited 

117. R V R Marine Products Private Limited 

118. S Chanchala Combines Private Limited 

119. Sagar Samrat Seafoods 

120. Sahada Exports 

121. Samaki Exports Private Limited 

122. Sasoondock Matsyodyog Sahakari 

Society Ltd. 

123. Sea Doris Marine Exports 

124. Seagold Overseas Pvt. Ltd. 

125. Shimpo Exports Private Limited 

126. Shimpo Seafoods Private Limited 

127. Shiva Frozen Food Exp. Pvt. Ltd. 

128. Shroff Processed Food & Cold Storage P 

Ltd. 

129. Silver Seafood 

130. Sita Marine Exports 

131. Sonia Fisheries 

132. Sri Sakkthi Cold Storage 

133. Srikanth International 

134. SSF Ltd. 

135. Star Agro Marine Exports Private 

Limited 

136. Star Organic Foods Private Limited 

137. Stellar Marine Foods Private Limited 

138. Sterling Foods 

139. Summit Marine Exports Private Limited 

140. Sun Agro Exim 

141. Supran Exim Private Limited 

142. Suvarna Rekha Exports Private Limited 

143. Suvarna Rekha Marines P Ltd. 

144. TBR Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

145. Teekay Marine P Ltd. 

146. The Waterbase Limited 

147. Torry Harris Seafoods Ltd. 

148. Triveni Fisheries P Ltd. 

149. U & Company Marine Exports 

150. Ulka Sea Foods Private Limited 

151. Uniroyal Marine Exports Ltd. 

152. Unitriveni Overseas Private Limited 

153. Vaisakhi Bio-Marine Pvt. Ltd. 

154. Vasai Frozen Food Co. 

155. Veronica Marine Exports Private 

Limited 

156. Victoria Marine & Agro Exports Ltd. 

157. Vinner Marine 

158. Vitality Aquaculture Pvt. Ltd. 

159. VKM Foods Private Limited 

160. VRC Marine Foods LLP 

161. Zeal Aqua Limited 

[FR Doc. 2022–14419 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–043] 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Expedited First Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

(CVD) order on stainless steel sheet and 

strip (SSSS) from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) would be likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Daniel Alexander, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4313. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 3, 2017, Commerce 

published the CVD order on SSSS from 

China.1 On March 1, 2022, Commerce 

published the notice of initiation of the 

first sunset review of the Order, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2

Commerce received a timely notice of 

intent to participate from ClevelandCliffs Inc., North American Stainless, 

and Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC 

(domestic interested parties) within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic 

interested parties claimed interested 

party status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act, as domestic producers engaged 

in the production of SSSS in the United 

States. 

Commerce received a substantive 

response from the domestic interested 

parties 4 within the 30-day deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We 

received no substantive response from 

any other interested parties in this 

proceeding. As a result, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), we 

determined that the respondent 

interested parties did not provide an 

adequate response to the notice of 

initiation and, therefore, Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are stainless sheet and strip, whether in 

coils or straight lengths. For a complete 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of topics discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via the Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b) of the Act, we determine that 

revocation of the CVD order on SSSS 

from China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the 

following rates: 

Company 

Subsidy 

rate 

(percent) 

Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel Co. Ltd 75.60 

Ningbo Baoxin Stainless Steel Co., Ltd .. 190.71 

Baosteel Stainless Steel Co Ltd.

Baoshan Iron & Steel Co, Ltd.


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES