alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 123 (Tuesday, June 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 38416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; NIH Clinical Center 
Collaboration.
    Date: July 12, 2022.
    Time: 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Shanta Rajaram, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS/NIH, NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, 
MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-435-6033, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#087a6962697a69657b486569616426666160266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e092818a8192818d93a08d81898cce8e8988ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 23, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-13778 Filed 6-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN RE L.G.

No. COA04-1531

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Catawba (02J281).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
2
                                                     Exhibit 10.1

 Summary of Intel Corporation Non-Employee Director Compensation

Cash Compensation

Annual Retainer:                                       $75,000

Annual Committee Fees:
     Lead Independent Director                         $30,000
     Audit Committee Chair                             $20,000
     Audit Committee members (other than
     Committee Chair)                                  $10,000
     Compensation Committee Chair                      $10,000
     Finance Committee Chair                           $10,000
     Corporate Governance and Nominating
     Committee Chair                                   $10,000
     Executive Committee Chair                         $10,000
     Sheltered Employee Retirement Plan Investment
     Policy Committee Chair                            $10,000

Retainer  and Fees are paid quarterly in cash and can be deferred
at  the  director's election under the Intel Corporation Deferral
Plan for Outside Directors.

Equity Compensation

Each  year,  non-employee directors may receive  award(s)  for  a
number  of  shares granted by the Board, but no more than  30,000
shares  annually. Subject to limits in the 2004 Equity  Incentive
Plan  terms, the Board has the discretion to determine  the  form
and terms of awards to non-employee directors.

Other Information


Non-employee directors' compensation is paid based on a  July  to
June  annual period.  Intel Corporation reimburses directors  for
their  travel  and related expenses in connection with  attending
Board  meetings  and Board-related activities and  provides  each
director  with a computer for his or her personal use. Directors'
charitable  contributions  that  meet  the  guidelines   of   the
Company's employee charitable matching gift program are  eligible
for  matching funds from the Company in an amount up  to  $10,000
per year.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5064 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5064

          To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ziram.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2008

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ziram.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ZIRAM.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.13.97 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Ziram) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Certification of Principal Executive Officer**I, Ayman Sabi, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Roadhouse Grill, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Intentionally omitted.  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.Date:May 16, 2007                                                   /s/ Ayman Sabi   Ayman Sabi   Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2018118EN.01000301.xml

| 4.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/3

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 April 2018

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 April 2018

(2018/C 118/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2308 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,76 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4492 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,87523 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 10,2968 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1775 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | 121,50 |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6338 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 25,367 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,24 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2087 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,6610 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 4,8967 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5994 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5818 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6602 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6964 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6114 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 297,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5517 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7351 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4320 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 935,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7702 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 64,034 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,8835 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,376 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0742 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,3936 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,0140 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2308

JPY

Japanese yen

130,76

DKK

Danish krone

7,4492

GBP

Pound sterling

0,87523

SEK

Swedish krona

10,2968

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1775

ISK

Iceland króna

121,50

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6338

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

25,367

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,24

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2087

RON

Romanian leu

4,6610

TRY

Turkish lira

4,8967

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5994

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5818

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6602

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6964

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6114

KRW

South Korean won

1 297,87

ZAR

South African rand

14,5517

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7351

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4320

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 935,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7702

PHP

Philippine peso

64,034

RUB

Russian rouble

70,8835

THB

Thai baht

38,376

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0742

MXN

Mexican peso

22,3936

INR

Indian rupee

80,0140

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
82 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

NEW YORK 

#4

$30.9 B SPENT IN 

#30 

1.6% OF STATE GDP

5.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,557

PER RESIDENT 

#4

$27.9 B CONTRACT 

#14

60,056 NUMBER OF 

#17

$3.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type Research and

Development: 3% Construction: 2%

Service: 5%

Supplies and Equipment: 90%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

13%

Air Force

5%

Other Defense

7%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 20%

National 

Guard: 28%

Civilian: 20%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

72%

Navy/Marines

9%

Air Force

16%

Other Defense

3%

Top Defense Contractors 

Pfizer, Inc.

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Lockheed Martin

L3Harris Technologies

BAE Systems

Dobco, Inc.

Thermo Electron Corp.

SRC

Assured Information Security

TTM Technologies

(M = millions, B = billions)

$13.3 B

$5.6 B

$2.4 B

$1.4 B

$256.3 M

$195.3 M

$192.7 M

$159.7 M

$154.9 M

$151.8 M

76%

Active Duty: 32%

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$27.9

$9.1 $9.6 $7.4 $6.4 $6.5 $6.0 $6.6

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

$3.0 BILLION 60,056

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Jefferson 15,657 2,221 77 

Orange 1,740 2,567 1,653

Onondaga 226 508 1,567

Oneida 65 1,927 693

Niagara 21 603 794 

Queens 84 107 621

Albany 213 1,404 909 

Kings 230 358 612

Schenectady 16 309 1,531

Suffolk 50 296 1,580

Reserve

221 

936

681

273 

1,536

1,931

33 

1,232

574 

338 

Total

18,176

6,896

2,982

2,958

2,954

2,743

2,559

2,432

2,430

2,264
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Schenectady

Albany

Kings

Jefferson

Niagara

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Orange

Westchester

Nassau

New York

Suffolk

Monroe

Erie

Tioga

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

New York

Westchester

Monroe

Tioga

Suffolk

Onondaga

Nassau

Oneida

Orange

Erie

(M = millions)

$13.8 B

$5.6 B

$1.7 B

$1.6 B

$1.1 B

$1.1 B

$690.1 M

$440.6 M

$403.9 M

$308.6 M

Jefferson

Orange

Oneida

Albany

Onondaga

Niagara

Schenectady

New York

Suffolk

Kings

$985.1 M

$445.2 M

$175.9 M

$170.2 M

$126.7 M

$113.0 M

$112.1 M

$106.3 M

$104.6 M

$98.5 M

Oneida 

Onondaga

Oneida

Onondaga

Orange Suffolk

New York

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 8

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

3

ISCAL YEAR 2018 NEW YORK
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with thefiling of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of InfoSonicsCorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2008, JeffreyKlausner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934  (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: August 14, 2008 | /s/ JEFFREY KLAUSNER |
|----------------------------|---------------------------|
|                       | Jeffrey Klausner,         |
| * *                   | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants
                    -----------------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
13, 2002, except for Note 14 which is as of March 18, 2002, relating to the
financial statements of Viisage Technology, Inc. (the "Company") appearing in
the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001
into the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.'s
333-28695, 333-42485, 333-90177 and 333-36734).


/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 25, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5168 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5168

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, as the ``Cody Grater 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

 Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida (for herself, Mr. Young of Florida, 
Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Boyd of 
Florida, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Keller of Florida, Mr. Putnam, Mr. Weldon of 
  Florida, Mr. Mahoney of Florida, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Meek of 
Florida, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Feeney, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-
    Balart of Florida, Mr. Mack, Mr. Buchanan, Ms. Corrine Brown of 
Florida, Mr. Stearns, Mr. Mica, Ms. Wasserman Schultz, Ms. Castor, Mr. 
Klein of Florida, and Mr. Wexler) introduced the following bill; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, as the ``Cody Grater 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CODY GRATER POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Cody Grater Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Cody 
Grater Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6776

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEROY GRIFFIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (3:02-cr-00036-WCB; 3:03-cv-00072-WCB)

Submitted: December 22, 2006 Decided: January 30, 2007

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brian Joseph Kornbrath, Federal Public Defender, Clarksburg, West

Virginia, for Appellant. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Leroy Griffin seeks to appeal the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims

by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any

dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise

debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Griffin has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
- Home
- Facts
- What is marine debris?

# **What is marine debris?**

## Marine debris is **more than an eyesore**

*NOAA divers release seal from marine debris entanglement. Entanglement in derelict fishing gear can lead to injury or death in marine organisms.*

Marine debris injures and kills marine life,  interferes with navigation safety, and poses a threat to human health. Our ocean and  waterways are  polluted with a wide variety of marine debris ranging  from soda cans and plastic bags to derelict fishing gear and abandoned vessels. 

Marine debris is defined as any persistent solid material that is  manufactured or processed and directly or indirectly, intentionally or  unintentionally, disposed of or abandoned into the marine environment or the Great Lakes. 

Today, there is no place on Earth immune to this problem. A majority of the trash and debris that covers our beaches comes from storm drains and sewers, as well as from shoreline and recreational  activities such as  picnicking and beachgoing. Abandoned or discarded fishing gear is also a major problem because this trash can entangle, injure, maim, and drown marine wildlife and damage property.  

##### More **Information**

NOAA Marine Debris Program 

 Marine Debris Fast Facts 

 Video: TRASH TALK 

##### **Last updated:**

###### 						 1/04/21					

**Author:** NOAA

How to cite this article

Contact Us

##### 					Feedback

              -  Provide Feedback 
              -  Contact Us
              -  Report an error

##### 					Social

              - 
              - 
              - 
*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
							About NOS						- About Us
- NOS Program Offices
- Media Inquiries
- Website Acknowledgements
- Site Index
- Disclaimer
							More Resources						- Freedom of Information Act
- Accessibility
- Information Quality
- Privacy Policy
- NOS For Employees
- USA.gov
-  Department of Commerce
-  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
-  National Ocean Service
STATE of North Carolina v. Kenneth Michael OAKLEY.

No. 21P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Don Willey, for Kenneth Michael Oakley.

Diane Miller, Assistant Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State.

***387*****ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of January 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."