alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Six, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of September 30, 2008, and for the period then ended.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/    GLADE M. KNIGHT 
|Glade M. Knight        
|Chief Executive Officer

November 3, 2008



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/    BRYAN PEERY     
|Bryan Peery            
|Chief Financial Officer

November 3, 2008
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Citigroup Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

Date: November 14,2005

----
WALLACE v. BECON CONST. CO.

No. COA05-316

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #815708).

Case reported without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.4

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 4, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul B. Carousso, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                       
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 18, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Paul B. Carousso                                                  
|                      |  |  |  | Paul B. Carousso Vice President, Finance (principal financial officer)
Jennifer LU, Petitioner v. STANFORD UNIVERSITY;

No. 19-5040

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 9, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 28.2
                                                 ------------

              ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
                   UCFC FUNDING CORPORATION
        MANUFACTURED HOUSING PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
        SERIES 1997-2, SERIES 1997-3 AND SERIES 1997-4  

      In accordance with Section 3.11 of certain Pooling
and Servicing Agreements relating to UCFC Funding Corporation
Manufactured Housing Pass-Through Certificates, Series 1997-2,
Series 1997-3 and Series 1997-4 for the year ended December 31,
1997 (the "Pooling and  Servicing Agreements"),  by and among
UCFC Funding Corporation, as depositor, United Companies Lending
Corporation, as  servicer (the  "Servicer"), and Bankers Trust
Company of California, N.A., as trustee, the undersigned officer
of the  Servicer does  hereby  certify  as  follows:  (i) a  review
of the activities  of  the Servicer during 1997 and  of  performance
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under
the  undersigned officer's supervision; and (ii) to the  best
of  such  undersigned  officer's  knowledge,  based  on  such
review,  the  Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for 1997.

     EXECUTED this 26th day of March, 1998.

                         /s/ C. GERON HARGON
                         ------------------------------------
                         C. Geron Hargon, President
                         United Companies Lending Corporation

                                PAGE 10
#### In the Matter of Larry Porter, Petitioner, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[800 NYS2d 792]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with harassing a prison employee and committing a sexual offense in violation of the prison disciplinary rules. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing, which determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

The misbehavior report, the testimony of the correction officer who authored it and the testimony of the prison employee that petitioner harassed provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner’s guilt *(see Matter of Ruggiero v Goord,*19 AD3d 907, 908 [2005]; *Matter of Goncalves v Berbary,*14 AD3d 743, 744 [2005]). The record does not support petitioner’s claim that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination of guilt flowed from any alleged bias *(see Matter of Black v Goord,*12 AD3d 1005, 1006 [2004]; *Matter of Johnson v Ricks,*297 AD2d 889, 890 [2002]). To the extent that they were preserved, petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.

*1169Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Mugglin, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed June 19, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-1276

Lower Tribunal No. 19-8255

________________

Susanna Alan,

Appellant,

vs.

Roger West,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Ivonne 

Cuesta, Judge.

Susanna Alan, in proper person. 

Abramowitz and Associates, and Jordan B. Abramowitz, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, LINDSEY and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 

1150 (Fla. 1979).
In the Matter of J.B.

No. 462A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 616 S.E.2d 385 (2005), affirming a disposition order for twelve months' supervised probation with conditions entered 16 January 2004 by Judge Jim Love, Jr. in District Court, Harnett County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 December 2005.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Mabel Y. Bullock, Special Deputy Attorney General, for the State.

Susan J. Hall, Fayetteville, for juvenile-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of High Grade Mining Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Robert M. Baker, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 15th day of October, 2004.



| | /s/ Robert M. Baker                                
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Robert M. Baker                                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

























---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commerce Energy Group, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending October 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), Richard L. Boughrum, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company. Date: December 15, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ RICHARD L. BOUGHRUMRICHARD L. BOUGHRUMSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
STATE v. BOULWARE

No. COA04-1609

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Union (02CRS55688, 03CRS50328, 03CRS3226).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. BEST.

No. COA04-1382.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Wake (02CRS84534, 02CRS84535, 02CRS84536, 02CRS84537, 02CRS84538, 02CRS84539, 02CRS84540, 02CRS84541, 02CRS84542, 02CRS84542, 02CRS84543, 02CRS84544, 02CRS74932)

Case reported without published opinion No error.
30 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

General Dynamics $9.5 B

Raytheon Technologies $7.9 B

Lockheed Martin $3.3 B

Gartner $42.4 M

PCX Aerosystems $32.3 M

Sonalysts $31.3 M

Emprise Corp. $31.3 M

Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. $27.3 M

Triumph Group, Inc. $26.6 M

Hartford Provision Co. $22.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

CONNECTICUT

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$819.9 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

14,785

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

New London 3,876 1,528 1,093 321 6,818

Hartford 70 788 2,203 489 3,550

Middlesex ND 70 617 370 ND

New Haven 69 62 493 275 899

Fairfield 22 188 208 343 761

Tolland 46 ND 37 0 ND

Litchfield ND 13 0 0 ND

Windham 0 ND 0 0 ND

Construction: 0%

Research and Development: 2% Service: 7%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 90%

Active Duty: 37%

Civilian: 18%

National 

Guard: 32%

Reserve: 12%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

4%

83%

11%

2%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

38%

49%

9%

4%

$10.9 $12.7

$7.6

$14.3

$18.2

$21.6

$17.8

$21.4

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#7 #3 4.0% $6,150 #6 #23 #38 #37

$22.3 B SPENT 

IN STATE

6.9% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$21.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

14,785 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$116.1 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 31

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

CONNECTICUT FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

New London

Hartford

Fairfield

New Haven

Litchfield

Middlesex

Windham

Tolland

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$9.7 B

$8.1 B

$3.5 B

$79.9 M

$26.4 M

$13.6 M

$10.0 M

$8.3 M

New London

Hartford

Fairfield

New Haven

Middlesex

Tolland

Litchfield

Windham

$442.9 M

$155.9 M

$40.1 M

$30.6 M

$29.8 M

$3.9 M

$955.8 K

$592.4 K

Litchfield

Hartford

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven

Litchfield

Hartford

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CFO PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NorthStar Realty Finance
      Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Andrew C. Richardson, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
                May 10, 2006
            By:
            /s/
                Andrew C. RichardsonAndrew
                C. Richardson
              Chief
                Financial Officer




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
48 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Raytheon Technologies $1.2 B

Lockheed Martin $214.7 M

BAE Systems $112.4 M

American Ordnance $87.2 M

AI Convoy Topco & CY SCA $35.3 M

Day & Zimmermann Group $18.4 M

Loffredo Gardens, Inc. $11.6 M

General Dynamics $11.1 M

SC Companies, Inc. $9.6 M

Carver Pump Co. $9.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

IOWA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$379.1 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,814

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Polk 90 693 3,282 752 4,817

Woodbury ND 267 1,107 66 ND

Scott 11 210 516 339 1,076

Linn ND 113 217 390 ND

Black Hawk 14 64 365 74 517

Boone 0 60 415 0 475

Johnson 18 32 408 ND ND

Dallas ND 0 74 244 ND

Dubuque ND 38 163 113 ND

Pottawattamie ND 12 215 57 ND

Construction: 0%

Research and 

Development: 5%

Service: 14%

Supplies and

Equipment: 81%

Active Duty: 2%

Civilian: 13%

National Guard: 68%

Reserve: 17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

27%

53%

16%

5%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

79%

3%

18%

1%

$1.1 $1.1 $1.3

$1.7 $1.8 $2.0

$1.7 $1.8

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#37 #43 0.4% $698 #34 #39 #41 #47

$2.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.0% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$1.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,814 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$67.7 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 49

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 IOWA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Linn

Des Moines

Scott

Polk

Muscatine

Johnson

Marion

Bremer

Woodbury

Hancock

(M = millions)

$1.5 B

$120.9 M

$50.9 M

$36.8 M

$26.0 M

$16.8 M

$4.4 M

$2.6 M

$1.2 M

$1.0 M

Polk

Woodbury

Scott

Linn

Boone

Black Hawk

Johnson

Dubuque

Webster

Pottawattamie

$169.4 M

$50.5 M

$33.1 M

$19.5 M

$13.7 M

$13.6 M

$12.7 M

$7.2 M

$6.5 M

$5.6 M

Woodbury

Woodbury

Hancock Bremer

Linn

Linn

Polk Johnson

Polk Johnson

Scott

Muscatine

Des Moines

Marion

Webster

Boone

Pottawattamie

Black Hawk Dubuque

Scott
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Green Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Arnold Hughes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 14th day of October, 2010.





A.R. HughesArnold Hughes, Chief Financial Officer
McCLELLAND v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS.

No. 479P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for Dept. of Corrections, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of November 2004 by Plaintiff for "Notice of Appeal":

> "Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
WILCOX v. BANKER INS. CO.

No. COA05-436.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (03CVS10578).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Green Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended February 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "Report"), I, J. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:






(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated this 21st day of April, 2010.






Doug FraterJ. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer
# L_2018155EN.01003502.xml

| 19.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 155/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 155/35

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/224 of 8 February 2017 setting out the technical and operational specifications allowing the commercial service offered by the system established under the Galileo programme to fulfil the function referred to in Article 2(4)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 34 of 9 February 2017
  )

Throughout the document:

for:

‘precision’,

read:

‘accuracy’.

---
CAROLINA BUILDERS CORP. v. BROWN

No. COA04-1222

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed August 16, 2005

Certification Date September 6, 2005

Appeal from Wake (02CVS2517).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our reports dated March 16, 2006 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of the internal controls over financial reporting of Viisage Technology, Inc. (the Company)
appearing in this Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 into the Companys previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.s 333-28695, 333-42485, 333-90177, 333-36734 and
333-120156). Our report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting expresses an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 
|                     
|Boston, Massachusetts
|July 24, 2006
EXHIBIT 13 (a)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Averback, President and CEO of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, do hereby certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the information contained in the Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2017 of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation





|Date:  May 11, 2018 |                                      
|------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                    |                                      
|By:                 | /s/ Paul Averback, MD                
|                    | Paul Averback, MD                    
|                    | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                    | Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation