40506 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

1See Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from the 

People’s Republic of China: Countervailing Duty 

Order, 82 FR 16166 (April 3, 2017) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87 

FR 11416 (March 1, 2022). 

3See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from 

China—Domestic Interested Parties’ Notice of Intent 

to Participate,’’ dated March 15, 2022. 

4See Domestic Interested Parties’ Letter, ‘‘FiveYear (‘‘Sunset’’) Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from 

China—Domestic Interested Parties’ Substantive 

Response to Notice of Initiation,’’ dated March 30, 

2022. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Expedited First Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

93. MMC Exports Limited 

94. MTR Foods 

95. Naik Frozen Foods Private Limited 

96. Naik Oceanic Exports Pvt. Ltd./Rafiq Naik 

Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

97. Naik Seafoods Limited 

98. NAS Fisheries Pvt. Ltd. 

99. Nine Up Frozen Foods 

100. NK Marine Exports LLP 

101. Nutrient Marine Foods Limited 

102. Oceanic Edibles International Limited 

103. Paragon Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd. 

104. Paramount Seafoods 

105. Pesca Marine Products Pvt., Ltd. 

106. Pijikay International Exports P Ltd. 

107. Pravesh Seafood Private Limited 

108. Premier Exports International 

109. Premier Marine Foods 

110. Premier Seafoods Exim (P) Ltd. 

111. Raju Exports 

112. Raunaq Ice & Cold Storage 

113. RDR Exports 

114. RF Exports Private Limited 

115. Riyarchita Agro Farming Private Limited 

116. Rupsha Fish Private Limited 

117. R V R Marine Products Private Limited 

118. S Chanchala Combines Private Limited 

119. Sagar Samrat Seafoods 

120. Sahada Exports 

121. Samaki Exports Private Limited 

122. Sasoondock Matsyodyog Sahakari 

Society Ltd. 

123. Sea Doris Marine Exports 

124. Seagold Overseas Pvt. Ltd. 

125. Shimpo Exports Private Limited 

126. Shimpo Seafoods Private Limited 

127. Shiva Frozen Food Exp. Pvt. Ltd. 

128. Shroff Processed Food & Cold Storage P 

Ltd. 

129. Silver Seafood 

130. Sita Marine Exports 

131. Sonia Fisheries 

132. Sri Sakkthi Cold Storage 

133. Srikanth International 

134. SSF Ltd. 

135. Star Agro Marine Exports Private 

Limited 

136. Star Organic Foods Private Limited 

137. Stellar Marine Foods Private Limited 

138. Sterling Foods 

139. Summit Marine Exports Private Limited 

140. Sun Agro Exim 

141. Supran Exim Private Limited 

142. Suvarna Rekha Exports Private Limited 

143. Suvarna Rekha Marines P Ltd. 

144. TBR Exports Pvt. Ltd. 

145. Teekay Marine P Ltd. 

146. The Waterbase Limited 

147. Torry Harris Seafoods Ltd. 

148. Triveni Fisheries P Ltd. 

149. U & Company Marine Exports 

150. Ulka Sea Foods Private Limited 

151. Uniroyal Marine Exports Ltd. 

152. Unitriveni Overseas Private Limited 

153. Vaisakhi Bio-Marine Pvt. Ltd. 

154. Vasai Frozen Food Co. 

155. Veronica Marine Exports Private 

Limited 

156. Victoria Marine & Agro Exports Ltd. 

157. Vinner Marine 

158. Vitality Aquaculture Pvt. Ltd. 

159. VKM Foods Private Limited 

160. VRC Marine Foods LLP 

161. Zeal Aqua Limited 

[FR Doc. 2022–14419 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–043] 

Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip From 

the People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Expedited First Sunset 

Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

(CVD) order on stainless steel sheet and 

strip (SSSS) from the People’s Republic 

of China (China) would be likely to lead 

to continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the levels 

indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of Sunset 

Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Daniel Alexander, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VII, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–4313. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On April 3, 2017, Commerce 

published the CVD order on SSSS from 

China.1 On March 1, 2022, Commerce 

published the notice of initiation of the 

first sunset review of the Order, 

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2

Commerce received a timely notice of 

intent to participate from ClevelandCliffs Inc., North American Stainless, 

and Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC 

(domestic interested parties) within the 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(1)(i).3 The domestic 

interested parties claimed interested 

party status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act, as domestic producers engaged 

in the production of SSSS in the United 

States. 

Commerce received a substantive 

response from the domestic interested 

parties 4 within the 30-day deadline 

specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). We 

received no substantive response from 

any other interested parties in this 

proceeding. As a result, pursuant to 

section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), we 

determined that the respondent 

interested parties did not provide an 

adequate response to the notice of 

initiation and, therefore, Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are stainless sheet and strip, whether in 

coils or straight lengths. For a complete 

description of the scope of the Order, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.5

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of topics discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is included as the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via the Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Final Results of Sunset Review 

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 

752(b) of the Act, we determine that 

revocation of the CVD order on SSSS 

from China would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of 

countervailable subsidies at the 

following rates: 

Company 

Subsidy 

rate 

(percent) 

Shanxi Taigang Stainless Steel Co. Ltd 75.60 

Ningbo Baoxin Stainless Steel Co., Ltd .. 190.71 

Baosteel Stainless Steel Co Ltd.

Baoshan Iron & Steel Co, Ltd.


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40507 

1See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended 

Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination 

and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170 (June 

21, 2019) (Order). 2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

41821, 41823 (August 3, 2021). 3See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India: 

Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

February 16, 2022. 4See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India: 

Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

5See GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc.’s Letter, 

‘‘Partial Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated November 1, 2021. 

6Rudraa International is one of the companies for 

which the review request was withdrawn. Id. In the 

last completed administrative review, Commerce 

collapsed Kumar Industries and Rudraa 

International. See Glycine from India: Final Results 

Continued 

Company 

Subsidy 

rate 

(percent) 

Baosteel Desheng Stainless Steel Co., 

Ltd.

Baosteel Co., Ltd.

Bayi Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.

Ningbo Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.

Shaoguan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.

Guangdong Shaoguan Iron & Steel Co., 

Ltd.

Zhanjiang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.

Daming International Import Export Co 

Ltd.

Tianjin Taigang Daming Metal Product 

Co., Ltd.

All Others ................................................ 75.60 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing the 

final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). 

Dated: June 29, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates 

Likely to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidies 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–14421 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–883] 

Glycine From India: Preliminary 

Results and Rescission, in Part, of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that producers and/or exporters 

subject to this administrative review 

made sales of subject merchandise at 

less than normal value during the 

period of review June 1, 2020, through 

May 31, 2021. We invite interested 

parties to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Bradshaw or Yang Jin Chun, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3896 or (202) 482–5760, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Background 

On June 21, 2019, Commerce 

published the antidumping duty order 

on glycine from India.1 On August 3, 

2021, Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on glycine 

from India.2 On February 16, 2022, 

Commerce extended the time limit for 

these preliminary results to June 30, 

2022, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act).3

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is glycine. For a complete description of 

the scope of the Order, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Act. Export price and constructed 

export price are calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying these 

preliminary results, see Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is made available 

to the public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list 

of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as an appendix to this notice. 

Rescission of Administrative Review, in 

Part 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the parties that requested a 

review withdraw the request within 90 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation. On November 1, 

2021, GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. 

withdrew its requests for review with 

respect to GEM Corpochem Private 

Limited, Indiana Chem-Port, J.R. 

Corporation, Mulji Mehta Enterprises, 

Mulji Mehta Pharma, Rexisize Rasayan 

Industries, and Studio Disrupt.5 Because 

the requests for review were timely 

withdrawn and no other parties 

requested a review of these companies, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), Commerce is partially 

rescinding this review of the Order for 

these seven companies. 

Application of Facts Available With 

Adverse Inferences 

Pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, 

Commerce is preliminarily relying upon 

facts otherwise available to determine a 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Kumar Industries/Rudraa International 

(collectively Kumar) 6 because: (1) 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES