alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(a)
                                                              Form 10-K for 1997
                                                              File No. 333-34793


                    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have examined management's assertion that AT&T Capital Corporation maintained
an effective system of internal controls over servicing leases and loans subject
to the Transfer and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 1997 for the
Capita Equipment Receivables Trust 1997-1 (the "Servicing Agreement") for the
period from November 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997, a copy of such management's
assertions is attached hereto.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
obtaining an understanding of the system of internal controls over servicing,
financial reporting, testing, and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of the system, and such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any system of internal controls, errors or
irregularities may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of the system to future periods are subject to the risk that the
system of internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that AT&T Capital Corporation maintained
an effective system of internal controls over servicing leases and loans subject
to the Servicing Agreement, for the period from November 1, 1997 to December 31,
1997, is fairly stated, in all material respects.



                                                             ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP




New York, New York
March 11, 1998
In re I.D.S. appealed by Ira Dewitt Shumate, II.

No. 124P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

David A. Perez, for Ira Dewitt Shumate.

Paul W. Freeman, Jr., Wilkesboro, for Wilkes County DSS.

Sherrie Hodges, Attorney Advocate, West Jefferson, for Guardian Ad Litem.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Respondent on the 24th day of February 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2005."
|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                  |                                                                                                                 |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                                                                 |
| November                8, 2006  | /s/                TODD B. PARRIOTT                                                                                  |
|                                  | Todd                B. Parriott,                                                                                     |
|                                  | Chairman                of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Investment                Officer |
|                                  |                                                                                                                 |
|                                  |                                                                                                                 |
| November                8, 2006  | /s/                JONATHAN G. ARENS                                                                                 |
|                                  | Jonathan                G. Arens                                                                                     |
|                                  | Chief                Financial Officer                                                                               |
ARMSTRONG v. KNIGHT

No. COA05-220.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Wilson (03CVS1939).

Case reported without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, William K. Aulet, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1. The accompanying annual report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Viisage Technology, Inc.



Date: March 30, 2004/s/    WILLIAM K.
AULETWilliam K. Aulet Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report.
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, John Salamon, certify that: (1)I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Salamon Group, Inc.;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:  a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  (5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. Date:  May 21, 2010  /s/ John E. SalamonBy:John E. SalamonTitle:Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial Officer
nxst-ex104_496.htm



 

Exhibit 10.4

AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF COMMERCIAL TIME

 

This Amendment dated as of April 30, 2019 by and between Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Quorum Broadcasting of Amarillo, LLC (“Nexstar”), and Mission Broadcasting, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Mission Broadcasting of Amarillo, Inc. (“Mission”) is made to that certain Agreement for Sale of Commercial Time dated May 1, 1999, as amended and extended (the “Agreement”).

 

WHEREAS, the Agreement expires by its terms on April 30, 2019; and

 

WHEREAS, Nexstar and Mission desire to extend the Agreement for two additional terms.

 

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing, Nexstar and Mission hereby amend the Agreement as follows:

 


	
 
	
1.
	
Paragraph 1 of the Agreement (Term of the Agreement) is hereby amended to provide that upon the expiration of the current term, the term of this Agreement will be extended for an additional eight (8) year term (the “Renewal Term”); and that upon expiration of the Renewal Term, unless otherwise terminated by either Party, the term of the Agreement will be extended automatically for an additional eight (8) year term.




 


	
 
	
2.
	
As so amended, all sections and provisions of the Agreement are hereby ratified in full.




 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Shared Services Agreement as of the date first written above.


	
 
	
MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Dennis Thatcher

	
 
	
Name:
	
Dennis Thatcher

	
 
	
Title:
	
 President

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Thomas R. Carter

	
 
	
Name:
	
 Thomas R. Carter

	
 
	
Title:
	
 EVP and Chief Financial Officer
76 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

BAE Systems $1.4 B

L3 Technologies $259.5 M

Safran Optics 1 $66.0 M

Red River Computer Company $65.8 M

Elbit Systems $38.4 M

Creare $28.2 M

Teledyne Technologies $27.6 M

Cobham $25.9 M

Lyme Computer Systems $18.6 M

Sig Sauer Inc. $17.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NEW HAMPSHIRE

#37 #14 0.5% $1,988 #30 #50 #50

$2.7 B SPENT 

IN STATE

3.1% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $2.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

6,281 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$241.6 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

6,281

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Rockingham 361 450 1,164 1,067 3,042

Hillsborough 50 176 606 ND

Merrimack ND 192 636 ND

Grafton ND 238 160 ND

Strafford 12 12 88 272 384

Cheshire ND ND ND 60

Coos ND ND 63 ND

Belknap ND ND ND ND

Construction: 0% Research and

Development: 16%

Service: 8%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 76%

Active Duty: 17%

Civilian: 17%

National 

Guard: 43%

Reserve: 22%

23%

34%

32%

11%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

49%

22%

27%

3%

$1.2 $1.5 $1.7

$1.2 $1.1 $1.1

$1.9

$2.5

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 77

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Coos

Grafton

Carroll

Belknap

Merrimack Sullivan

Strafford

Hillsborough Rockingham

Cheshire

NEW HAMPSHIRE FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands. M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Hillsborough

Rockingham

Grafton

Sullivan

Strafford

Cheshire

Merrimack

Belknap

Coos

Carroll

(K = thousands. M = millions)

$1.7 B

$559.7 M

$90.4 M

$68.2 M

$23.8 M

$23.6 M

$12.0 M

$12.0 M

$348.0 K

$16.6 K

Rockingham

Merrimack

Hillsborough

Grafton

Strafford

Cheshire

Coos

Belknap

$103.1 M

$36.3 M

$28.1 M

$19.5 M

$7.1 M

$984.4 K

$796.4 K

$309.8 K

Coos

Grafton

Belknap

Merrimack

Rockingham

Cheshire

Hillsborough

Strafford
**Exhibit32.1**

**CertificationPursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

        Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Hospira, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Christopher B. Begley, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/  CHRISTOPHER B. BEGLEY                        |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher B. Begley  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 8, 2007                                              |

 

31

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4999 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4999

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Mesosulfuronmethyl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2008

Mr. Neugebauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Mesosulfuronmethyl.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MESOSULFURONMETHYL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.48 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# CE2004078EN.01062902.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/629 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/629

---

(2004/C 78 E/0664)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3691/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(9 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on use of funding from the Daphne programme by the municipality of Pesaro-Urbino

Subject:

In its answer to question E-1011/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Pesaro-Urbino had submitted projects and secured funding under the Daphne programme, the Commission stated that a number of proposals had been submitted, but that the outcome of the assessment would be available in July 2003.

1

Can the Commission say whether the projects submitted actually received funding and, if not, why they were not considered suitable?

Have any other projects been submitted in the meantime?

---

(1)  OJ C 51 E, 26.2.2004, p. 62.

1

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Tyrone Larry PEREZ.

No. 539P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 2, 2004.

Tyrone Perez, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 13th day of October 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of December 2004."
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 40331]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14314]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Interest Rates

    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called 
the optional ``peg'' rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This 
rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for 
maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be 
used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. 
This rate will be 2.75 percent for the July-September quarter of FY 
2022.
    Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for 
any third party lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the 
cost of a 504 project (see 13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New 
York Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted 
by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate 
will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given 
State.

John Wade,
Chief, Secondary Market Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-14314 Filed 7-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
STATE v. Gary LAWRENCE.

No. 457PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 12, 2005.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Frank R. Parrish, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of July 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Lawrence) shall have up to and including the 29th day of August 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 12th day of July 2005."
Jennifer L. PITTS, Administratrix of the Estate of Felicia Hope Lynch v. NASH DAY HOSPITAL, INC., Englewood Ob-Gyn Associates, P.A., Tommy R. Harris, and Moses E. Wilson.

No. 22A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 1, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 605 S.E.2d 154 (2004), reversing an order allowing defendants' motion for directed verdict entered on 19 December 2002 by Judge Milton F. Fitch, Jr. in Superior Court, Nash County. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 May 2005.

*268Rountree & Boyette LLP, by Charles S. Rountree, Tarboro, for plaintiff-appellee.

Yates, McLamb & Weyher, L.L.P., by Barry S. Cobb and James T. Newman, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant-appellants Harris, Wilson, and Englewood Ob-Gyn Associates, P.A.

Roberts & Stevens, P.A., by James W. Williams and Anne W. Ford, Asheville, for North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys, amicus curiae.

Faison & Gillespie, by Mark R. McGrath, Durham, for North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5226 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5226

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Butane, 1-chloro.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2008

  Mr. Bonner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Butane, 1-chloro.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BUTANE, 1-CHLORO.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Butane, 1-chloro    Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          (CAS No. 109-69-                                                   31/2011.......
                          3) (provided for
                          in subheading
                          2903.19.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. Kenneth BROWN, Jr.

No. 413P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 9, 2005.

Sofie Hosford, Wilmington, for Kenneth Brown, Jr.

Ben David, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 8th day of August 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed pending determination of the State's Petition for Discretionary Review by order of the Court in conference this the 9th day of August 2005."