alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1519 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1519

            For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 11, 2013

Mr. King of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
            For the relief of Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ALEMSEGHED MUSSIE TESFAMICAL.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Alemseghed Mussie 
Tesfamical shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for 
adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical enters 
the United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection 
(c), he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and 
shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status 
under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Alemseghed Mussie Tesfamical, 
the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 
1, during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number 
of immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Alemseghed 
Mussie Tesfamical shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
24 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

CALIFORNIA

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

By Type

Service: 42%

Construction: 2%

Research and 

Development: 15%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 41%

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions B=billions)

Lockheed Martin $4.9 B

Northrop Grumman $4.0 B

Boeing $3.3 B

Health Net $3.0 B

McKesson $2.7 B

General Atomic Technologies $1.7 B

Raytheon $1.3 B

General Dynamics $775.7 M

Aerospace Corporation $740.2 M

BAE Systems $472.3 M

$41.5

$40.2

$42.2 $42.1

$37.2 $38.5

$36.4

$39.3

27%

36%

11%

26%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$12.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

325,405

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

 Military

San Diego 156,766 123,345 25,235

San Bernardino 28,851 24,026 3,845

Los Angeles 13,480 2,426 3,889

Kern 12,856 3,489 8,674

Solano 12,849 7,739 1,982

Monterey 12,270 7,386 4,576

Ventura 11,509 3,568 5,890

Riverside 9,023 531 2,896

Kings 7,443 6,080 906

Yuba 6,798 5,030 925

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 14%

Active Duty: 64%

Civilian: 22%

20%

62%

16%

2%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 25

Kern

Yolo

San Diego

Los Angeles

San Bernardino

Ventura

Santa Clara

Sacramento

Riverside

Kern

Solano

San Diego

Los Angeles San Bernardino

Ventura

Kings Monterey

Yuba

San Diego County

$6.4 B

Kern County

$836.1 M

San Bernardino County 

$717.5 M

Ventura County

$674.5 M

Monterey County

$649.4 M

Solano County

$524.7 M

Los Angeles County

$494.9 M

Yuba County

$288.7 M

Riverside County

$281.3 M

Kings County

$260.0 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

San Diego County

$8.4 B

Los Angeles County

$6.2 B

Santa Clara County

$5.3 B

Orange County

$3.5 B

Sacramento County

$3.4 B

Yolo County

$2.7 B

Santa Barbara County

$1.7 B

Ventura County

$822.4 M

Kern County

$695.6 M

Santa Bernardino County

$682.1 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS

#1

$48.8 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#25

1.8% OF STATE GDP

12.9%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$1,243

PER RESIDENT

#1

$36.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#1

325,405 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#2

$12.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 CALIFORNIA

(M=millions B=billions)

(M=millions B=billions)

Orange

Santa Barbara

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Anthony J. Orlando, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MSW Energy Holdings II LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 4, 2006         By: /s/ Anthony J. Orlando       Anthony J. Orlando      Chief Executive Officer and President
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM






Board of Directors
SE Financial Corp.

We have  reviewed the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheet of SE Financial
Corp. and subsidiary as of July 31, 2006, the related consolidated statements of
income for the three-month and nine-month  periods ended July 31, 2006 and 2005,
the consolidated statement of changes in stockholders' equity for the nine-month
period ended July 31, 2006, and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the
nine-month  periods ended July 31, 2006 and 2005. These  consolidated  financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted  our review in  accordance  with  standards  of the Public  Company
Accounting  Oversight  Board  (United  States).  A review of  interim  financial
information consists principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with the  standards  of the  Public  Company  Accounting  Oversight  Board,  the
objective  of which is the  expression  of an opinion  regarding  the  financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the  accompanying  financial  statements for them to be in conformity
with U.S generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in  accordance  with the  standards of the Public
Company  Accounting  Oversight Board (United States),  the consolidated  balance
sheet as of October 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes  in  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented  herein);  and in our report  dated  December 9, 2005 we  expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



/s/S.R. Snodgrass, A.C.

Wexford, PA
September 5, 2006
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.1





Compensation Terms Randall S. Dearth
Appointment as Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors


Effective as of August 1, 2019 your role and compensation will change.	
			
	Element
	Current
	Effective August 1st

	Role
	President and Chief Operating Officer
	Chief Executive Officer

	Base Salary
	$690,000
	$775,000

	Target Bonus*
	85%
	100%

	Long Term Incentive Award **
	$1,300,000
	$2,000,000

	Pro-Rata Promotion Award ***
	N/A
	$300,000






*Bonus at end of year would be prorated for time at new target bonus level (58.33% at 85% to August 1 then 41.66% at 100%) based on the same pro-ration of salary
**Long-term incentive award shown to be granted during normal annual grant in February 2020 under the award mix and terms and conditions set forth by the Compensation Committee for those awards
***Pro-rata Promotion Award will be granted effective August 1 in the same mix (50% PBU, 25% RSU and 25% SO by fair market value of awards) and terms and conditions as the February 2019 awards as set forth by the Compensation Committee


I understand and agree the changes as described above.
Signed
		
	/s/ RANDALL S. DEARTH
	/s/ GERALD G. COLLELA


		
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	Chairman of the Compensation Committee


		
	Date: June 27, 2019
	Date: June 27, 2019
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Modena 5 Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending April 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christopher
Penner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Christopher Penner
--------------------------
Christopher Penner
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer

June 14, 2004
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the  Company ), for the year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the  Report ), I, Gary DeMel, Chief Executive Officer and Richard Damion, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:



(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and



(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard Damion

Richard Damion

Chairman of the Board

Chief Financial Officer



Dated:  10/13/2009



/s/ Gary DeMel

Chief Executive Officer



Dated:  10/13/2009



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and will be retained by International Food Products Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE of North Carolina v. Chad Evrist HERNDON.

No. 88P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Anne M. Gomez, Assistant Appellate Defender, John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 25th day of February 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Robeson County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Advisory Committee for Polar Programs (#1130).                

*Date and Time:*                     July 25, 2022, 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. EST.                

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 | Virtual via Zoom.                

*Virtual meeting attendance:*                     A virtual link to access the meeting will be posted on the AC OPP website at:                     *https://nsf.gov/​geo/​opp/​advisory.jsp*.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Sara Eckert, Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Ave., Alexandria, VA 22314; Contact: (703) 292-7899/                    *seckert@nsf.gov*.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     AC review of Antarctic Research Vessel (ARV) Science Advisory Subcommittee (SASC) report following the ARV's Interim Design Review #1.                

*Agenda:*                     Review and evaluate the SASC report, and vote on whether the report should be forwarded to the NSF Office of Polar Programs.                

Dated: June 24, 2022.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2022-13927 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
n o, li'at-o&mz-'Lft

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS * mavoa?A APPeALs ^RECEIVEDIN MAY 04 2^3 COURTOFCRMNALAPPEALS 

### yq^TTJe^AbelAcostar^lerk »cx«s MAY 04 2015 p c ^ ,- i= ^ i
- r- ^- AbelAcosta, Clerk

ro r«F UoA/QRnBits r_oo/?r op cW^)a//)l appeals t Com^A/o^^ cHMsrot°H&ft Rf)T B/i(?rrA/x'App,4Lt)On+" p^o^e. iV» *A<i 

### Hoy^C)rc,4/e. coorj- /o ex}e.nd /-iie. An^e, Po^ P/Vnjj ^ppe.Da^\ pro St, PiWhlOrs for b)$CLceJ-f0ri6ry tfe~\/t€.l*J ;*n /be CQuJfi. a"<A S*jpf>®^ Appeals i± Chr]slaph<z-r Rcy 0Qr/e.n ia rte -S/o/e, apTe^tfs AppealS

_ T-» -fJie. sAy/e. and fiuwl^r of He to.se. jV* fl»<^ Aoej/ Cour-/ <»J? « on^/y /^ Z6;o 40, TA«. ^etfd/me Po^ P/A>if AW /?/>/>*,/JWs tiJiWcm. 9or 

### S-, /9n e.*f±Y)Sic»r\ ofA/yy\s. Por & ]pt,rj&4 of Sjxlyf&o} <J&yS js ,pu^j&siid—.&ln' Moult} rwakz, fioz. due. d%h, S\j\y jd -z,e>)s" „ C- Mo prior- ro^v^s-As fo^r Cm -t,/>h<tv)jr/cm of Afw^ JiOS htty) 

### re,^ues"Mcl. .€.^.f_e.oy/o>i <Kre._4^-_Pd//ouJ-C i rAe App^llar\^ ti)cis. rcprtsjcu/e^ , 

### ky—(Lb-wi- etppo)fifed Counsel dv^inG j\)Z toppedJ6? hW e-^se. Aa f^e. , 

### ,Gourt-S&L^rmd^LJ pi-orr> Hie ctppt-al* fipp^iLwl hqs h ok/cir*



## Copies oP Ak opptl/bk r^car£s to p^-P^J- Ak«- f>z.tikov\ Por . D/'i CrcAi*D^^^V /?-e.v»c-u»> >A/je,^€.; dddi ltc>vc*l f'^c IS ftziittd
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Paul B. Carousso,certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Visant Holding Corp. ;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Eachregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for each such registrant and we have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to such registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring this period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of such registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in such registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, suchregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Eachregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrants’ auditors and the audit committee of such registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect such registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in such registrants’ internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 11, 2006 | /s/ Paul B. Carousso          |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                  | Paul B. Carousso              |
|                  | *Vice  President, Finance*    |
|                  | *(Chief  Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Reginald Corey GRAY.

No. 248P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

M. Gordon Widenhouse, Jr., Chapel Hill, for Reginald Corey Gray.

Ronald M. Marquette, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of May 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
Exhibit
      23.1





Independent
      Auditors’ Consent


The
      Board of Directors


Information
      Architects Corporation





We
      consent to the incorporation on Form 10KSB with respect to our report dated
      March 3, 2005 of the balance sheet of Information Architects Corporation as
      of
      December 31, 2003 and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity
      and cash flows for the year then ended.


**Jaspers
                + Hall, PC**
              
              
              BY:
                /S/ Jaspers + Hall, PC
              ——————————————
              Jaspers
                + Hall, PC
              Denver
                Colorado
              April
                13, 2005
STATE v. COSTON

No. COA04-458

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 3, 2005.

Certification Date May 23, 2005.

Appeal from the Perquimans (98CRS1094, 03CRS59).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed.