alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016244EN.01000901.xml

| 13.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 244/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 244/9

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1642

of 12 September 2016

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 of 7 July 2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2465/96 (1), and in particular Article 11(b) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on the date of 22 May 2003 under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on the date of 22 May 2003 under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 6 September 2016, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entity from the list of persons or entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 6 September 2016, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entity from the list of persons or entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

| (3) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 12 September 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Acting Head of the Service for Foreign Policy Instruments

---

(1)  
  OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 6. Regulation as last amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 131/2011 (OJ L 41, 15.2.2011, p. 1).

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003, the following entry is deleted:

| ‘109. | SOUTH REFINERIES COMPANY. Address: Basra, Iraq.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘109.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5100 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5100

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain semi-manufactured 
                             forms of gold.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2008

 Mr. Simpson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain semi-manufactured 
                             forms of gold.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SEMI-MANUFACTURED FORMS OF GOLD.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.71.08 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-51135 c/w No. 11-51136 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RICARDO PEREZ-CALDERON, also known as Ricardo Morales Perez, Defendant-Appellant

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RICARDO PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-1560-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 15, 2012 Lyle W. Cayce ClerkNo. 11-51135 c/w No. 11-51136

2 Ricardo Perez-Calderon challenges his concurrent 84-month sentencesfor illegal reentry and failure to register as a sex offender. He asserts that the district court plainly erred in calculating a guidelines range of 77 to 96 months based on a determination that Perez was required to register as a Tier I II sex offender. According to Perez, the correct guidelines range was 70 to 87 months. Even if Perez could show a clear or obvious error and that the correct range was 70 to 87 months, he fails to show that the error affected his substantial rights where his sentence falls within both ranges. He relies upon the district court’s statement that it was “going to assess a sentence in the middle of the Guidelines.” We have rejected a nearly identical argument. See United States v. Blocker, 612 F.3d 413, 416-17 (5th Cir. 2010). A “casual statement” by the district court does not establish the requisite reasonable probability that Perez w ould have received a lesser sentence under a lower range. I d. Accordingly, he fails to establish reversible plain error. See Puckett v. United States, 556 U.S. 129, 135 (2009); Blocker, 612 F.3d at 416-17. AFFIRMED.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129160 & (20) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129160 COA: 259953 Wayne CC: 93-002433 BRUCE ALAN HOWARD, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 24, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to correct is DENIED.

d1121 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2005

Clerk
[ Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Davis v. Mercy St. Vincent Med. Ctr

. , Slip Opinion No. 2023
- Ohio
- 4723 .]

NOTICE This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published.

S LIP O PINION N O . 2023

- O HIO - 4723 D AVIS , I NDIVIDUALLY AND AS E X R . OF THE E STATE OF D AVIS , E T AL ., A PPELL EE S , v . M ERCY S T . V INCENT M EDICAL C ENTER ET AL . , A PPELL ANTS . [ Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Davis v. Mercy St. Vincent Med. Ctr

. , Slip Opinion No. 2023
- Ohio
- 4723 .] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of Everhart v. Coshocton Cty. Mem. Hosp

. and cause remanded

. (No s
. 202 2

- 0 46 0 and 2022

- 0658 ―Submitted December 2 0 , 202 3 ―Decided December 28 , 202 3 .) A PPEAL from and C ERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Lucas County,

No. L

- 21

- 1095 , 2022

- Ohio

- 1266

.

__________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the Sixth District Court of Appeals is reversed on the authority of Everhart v. Coshocton Cty. Mem. Hosp. , __ Ohio St.3d __, 202 3

- Ohio

4670 , __ N .E.3d __ , and the cause is remanded to that court for it to consider appellee s’ arguments that it previously declined to address

.S UP REME C OURT OF O HIO

2 K ENNEDY , C.J., and F ISCHER , D E W INE , D ONNELLY , S TEWART , B RUNNER , and D ETERS , JJ., concur.

________________ _ Gary W. Osborne and Jack S. Leizerman, for appellee s , Donald A. Davis and Dustin Davis

. Robison, Curphey, & O’Connell, L.L.C., Julia Smith Wiley, and Kayla L. Henderson, for appellant Mercy St. Vincent Medical Center. Reminger Co., L.P.A., Taylor C. Knight, and Erin Siebenhar Hess, for appellants Fayyaz H. Hashmi, M.D., Mercy Health North, L.L.C., f

. k

. a
. Mercy Health System

- Northern Region, and Mercy Medical Partners, Northern Region, L.L.C

.

_________________
STATE v. William Beach SMITH.

No. 346A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 21, 2005.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Southern Pines, Joseph Blount Cheshire, V, Raleigh, for William Beach Smith.

*238C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th day of July 2005 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 8th day of August 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of July 2005."
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Thomas J. Colatosticertify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSBof BIO-key International, Inc. (the “company”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the companyand have:

 

(a)           Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;

 

(b)           Evaluated the effectiveness of thecompany’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

 

(c)           Disclosed in this report any changein the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the company’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

5.             The company’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)           All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)           Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in thecompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: April 11, 2006          |   |                |
|-------------------------------|--------|---------------------|
|                          |   |                |
| /s/  THOMAS J. COLATOSTI |   | Thomas J. Colatosti |   |
| Co-Chief  Executive Officer   |   |                |
|                               |        |                     |  |

 

----
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrants. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |         |   |   |                                                  |
|-----------------------------------|--------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: November 14, 2008 |    | BY:    |   | /s/ WILLIAM S. MORRIS IV                              |
|                              |    |   |   | William      S. Morris IVChief      Executive Officer |
|                              |         |   |
| Date: November 14, 2008 |    | BY:    |   | /s/ STEVE K. STONE                                    |
|                              |    |   |   | Steve      K. StoneChief      Financial Officer       |
Jarvis LASSITER, Plaintiff v. C.L. COHN (in her official capacity as a police officer for the City of Durham), and City of Durham, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs v. Patricia Theisen, Third-Party Defendant.

No. 138P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

William S. Mills, Stewart W. Fisher, Durham, Carlos E. Mahney, for Jarvis Lassiter.

Sherrod Banks, Research Triangle Park, John Roseboro, for Cohn, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of March 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2005."
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the“Report”) of InfoSonics Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June30, 2006, Joseph Ram, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: August 14, 2006 |     | /s/ JOSEPH  RAM                    |
|------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------|
|                   |     | Joseph Ram,                             |
| * *               | * * | *Chief Executive Officer and President* |

 

1

----
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


                 This Amendment to Employment Agreement (the "Amendment") is
entered into April 15, 1997 by and between COSTILLA ENERGY, INC. (the
"Company") and CADELL S. LIEDTKE ("Liedtke").

                                R E C I T A L S

                 A.       The Company and Liedtke entered into an Employment
Agreement dated September 1, 1996, which Employment Agreement became effective
October 14, 1996 (the "Original Agreement").

                 B.       The Company and Liedtke have agreed to modify the
Original Agreement by this Amendment for the sole purpose of modifying
Liedtke's title under Section 3 of the Original Agreement.

                 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Liedtke for good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged agree to
modify the Original Agreement as follows:

                 1.       Section 3 of the Original Agreement is deleted and
replaced to read in its entirety as follows:

                 "Liedtke's title during his term of employment shall be
                 Chairman of the Board.  During the term of this Agreement, and
                 subject to the other provisions of this Agreement, Liedtke
                 shall diligently provide services to the Company."

                 2.       Except as modified by this Agreement, all other terms
of the Original Agreement shall remain unchanged.

                 EXECUTED the date and year first above written.

                                        COSTILLA ENERGY, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Michael J. Grella           
                                           -----------------------------------
                                           Michael J. Grella, President

                                            /s/ Cadell S. Liedtke
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           CADELL S. LIEDTKE





                                       1
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency [Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002]
 AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency; Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: Notice; correction.
 SUMMARY: On June 1, 2022, FEMA published in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         a changes in flood hazard determination notice that contained an erroneous table. This notice provides corrections to that table to be used in lieu of the erroneous information. The table provided here represents the changes in flood hazard determinations and communities affected for the City of Margaret and Unincorporated Areas of St. Clair County, Alabama.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-7659, or (email) 
                        *patrick.sacbibit@fema.dhs.gov;*
                         or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance eXchange (FMIX) online at 
                        *https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/​fhm/​fmx_​main.html.*


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Correction In the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     of June 1, 2022, in FR Doc. 2022-11679, in the table on page 33186, the entries for Alabama: St. Clair County are corrected to read as follows (after the signature): Michael M. Grimm, Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
 
 
 State and county
Location and case No.
Chief executive
                             officer of community
Community map repository
Date of modification
Community
                             No.Alabama:St. Clair County (FEMA Docket No.: B-2136)
City of Margaret (20-04-4313P)
The Honorable Jeffery G. Wilson, Mayor, City of Margaret, P.O. Box 100, Margaret, AL 35953
St. Clair County Flood Management Department,  165 5th Avenue, Suite 100, Ashville, AL 35953
Aug. 20, 2021
010393St. Clair County (FEMA Docket No.: B-2136)
Unincorporated areas of St. Clair County (20-04-4313P)
The Honorable Paul Manning, Chairman, St. Clair County Commission, 165 5th Avenue, Suite 100, Ashville, AL 35953
St. Clair County Flood Management Department, 165 5th Avenue, Suite 100, Ashville, AL 35953
Aug. 20, 2021
010290


[FR Doc. 2022-14271 Filed 7-5-22; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-12-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WILLIAM GRANT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 74 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of June, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, William K. Aulet, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1. The accompanying amended annual report on Form 10-K/A
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Viisage Technology, Inc.



Date: July 5, 2005/s/    WILLIAM K.
AULETWilliam K. Aulet Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report.