alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (the " Company "), for the Fiscal year end June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the " Report "), I, Richard Damion, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge that:

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and



(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Richard Damion

Richard Damion

Chairman of the Board

Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  

October 28, 201

1



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NEWPORT DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and will be retained by Newport Digital Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
An official website of the United States government.								Here's how you know we're official.				

##### dot gov icon**Official websites use .gov**

A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

##### https icon**Secure websites use HTTPS**

A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

National Ocean ServiceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

              -  Home 
              -  Ocean Facts 
              -  TOPICS ****                  - Explore All Topics
                - Careers
                - Economy
                - Ecosystems
                - Geodesy
                - Hazards
                - Navigation
                - Observations
                - Ocean
                - Recreation
                - Sea Level Rise 
                - Story Maps
                - Tools 
              -  Education 
              -  News 
              -  Podcasts 
              -  Video 
              -  Images 
              -  About Us 

HomeEducationCoralsHow Do Corals Reproduce?

# Corals Releasing Eggs

This close-up photo  shows rows of individual brain coral polyps in different stages of  releasing their eggs. Images like these are very hard to obtain because  mass synchronized spawnings only occur on a few nights each year.  (Photo: Burek)

### Corals Lessons

              - Welcome
              - What are Corals?
              - Zooxanthellae What's That?
              - How Do Stony Corals Grow?
              - How Do Coral Reefs Form?
              - Where Are Coral Reefs Found?
              - How Do Corals Reproduce?
              - Importance of Coral Reefs
              - Natural Threats to Coral Reefs
              - Anthropogenic Threats to Corals
              - Coral Diseases
              - Protecting Coral Reefs
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources 
              - Subject Review (PDF)

----

National Science Teaching Association (NSTA)

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
#### James Henry TUCKER, Jr., alias F. M. MOORE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 11759.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

June 8, 1953.

Norbert J. Bunke, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

John Brown, U. S. Atty., Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.

Before ALLEN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause coming on to he heard upon the record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel for appellant, and it appearing that there was substantial evidence to sustain the verdict of the jury, and there appearing no reversible error.

Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the judgment of the District Court he and is hereby affirmed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas** 

March 7, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00137

- CV

IN RE STONEBROOK MAN OR, SNF, LLC , d/b/a Advanced Rehabilitation Healthcare of Live Oak, LLC f/k/a Stonebrook Manor at Broadway

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

On March 6, 2018, relator filed a Petition for Writ of Man damus complaining of the trial court’s February 15, 2018 “Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Overrule Objections and Compel Production of All Responsive Documents From the Defendant” (the “order”). Relator also filed a Motion to Stay. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real part y in interest may file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus

in this court no later than March 23, 2018. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4.

Relator’s request for a stay is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The portion of the trial court’s order overruling relator’s objections to certain requests for production and interrogatories and requiring relator to provide responsive documents and responses to those discovery requests by 5:00 p.m. on March 15, 2018 is STAYED pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. The portio n of the trial court’s order requiring responses by 5:00 p.m. on March 15, 2018 to discovery requests for which relator’s objections were either

“withdrawn” or “sustained” is NOT STAYED.

Relator’s request that all proceedings in the underlying case be st ayed pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017

- CI

- 19392 , styled Janet Baxter, As Next Friend of Ella Baxter, An Incapacitated Person v. Stonebrook Manor SNF, LLC d/b/a Advanced Rehabilitation Healthcare of Live Oak, LLC f/k/a Stonebrook Manor at Broadway , pending in the 37th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the

Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding.It is so ORDERED on March 7, 2018

.



### PER CURIA M

ATTESTED TO:

_____________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32





STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the Form10-Q) of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (the Company) I, Mark C. Riley, Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer of the Companyhereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(a)

the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b)

the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company asof and for the periods presented in the Form l0-Q



/s/ Mark C. Riley

Date: May 17, 2004

Mark C. Riley

Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit








 
Exhibit 10.4




TWELFTH AMENDMENT 
TO THE SECOND RESTATEMENT OF THE 
MERIT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. 401(k) PROFIT SHARING PLAN


Merit Medical Systems, Inc. (the “Employer”) hereby adopts this Twelfth Amendment to the Second Restatement of the Merit Medical Systems, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”) on the date noted below.


WHEREAS, the Employer previously adopted the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Employer reserves the right to amend said Plan from time to time; and


WHEREAS, the provisions of Item 14. are being amended retroactively to bring the Plan’s terms into compliance with its operation pursuant to the Internal Revenue Service Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System, as provided under Revenue Procedure 2018-52; and


WHEREAS, the Employer desires to amend the Plan to allow the early inclusion of eight otherwise Eligible Employees.


NOW, THEREFORE, effective June 1, 2018, the former employees of NinePoint Medical, Inc. hired by the Employer May 1, 2018 and on May 13, 2018 will be allowed to enter the Plan on June 1, 2018 and become Participants immediately. 


Except as amended hereinabove, the Plan shall remain unchanged, and as amended herein, shall continue in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employer has executed this Amendment this 5th day of May, 2018.


	
				
	 
	 
	 
	Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ Fred P. Lampropoulos

	 
	 
	Title:
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COSTILLA ENERGY, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,251
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,859
<ALLOWANCES>                                       864
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,292
<PP&E>                                         321,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 210,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           75,626
<BONDS>                                        181,780
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                         1,275
<OTHER-SE>                                    (47,732)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   210,954
<SALES>                                         62,785
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                63,602
<CGS>                                           27,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,089
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   663
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,596
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (99,974)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (99,974)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (299)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (100,273)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (10.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (10.24)
        

</TABLE>
IN RE S.R.S.

No. COA04-1386.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 7, 2005.

Certification Date June 27, 2005.

Appeal from Halifax (03J37, 03J38)

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded for further proceedings.
EXHIBIT 31



SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION



I, Robert G. Gwin, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ProsoftTraining;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date: October 27, 2003

|                                                                  
|------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    ROBERT G.
GWIN                                             
|                                                                  
|Robert G. Gwin Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
WESTWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC. v. AESTHETIC, INC.

No. COA04-1422

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Catawba (01CVS2552).

Case without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
54 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Placid Refining Co. $247.2 M

Conrad Industries, Inc. $88.9 M

Valiant Integrated Services, LLC $51.3 M

Bollinger Shipyards, Inc. $50.2 M

Amentum Services, Inc. $48.5 M

RQ Construction, LLC $36.4 M

Alpha Marine Services, LLC $35.5 M

SLSCO $33.1 M

Gravois Aluminum Boats $32.2 M

Swiftships $25.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

LOUISIANA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.8 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

36,419

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Parish Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Vernon 7,264 1,430 95 27 8,816

Bossier 5,055 1,454 140 1,896 8,545

Orleans 1,002 1,786 2,387 2,227 7,402

Rapides 17 381 1,449 ND ND

East Baton Rouge 142 102 558 526 1,328

Tangipahoa ND 100 794 0 ND

Iberville ND 36 817 ND ND

Plaquemines 72 616 0 ND ND

Calcasieu ND 47 324 131 ND

Lafayette 17 50 326 74 467

Construction: 12%

Research and

Development: 3%

Service: 42%

Supplies and

Equipment: 44%

Active Duty: 38%

Civilian: 18%

National 

Guard: 31%

Reserve: 13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

37%

13%

27%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

61%

11%

26%

2%

$1.7 $1.5

$0.8

$1.8

$2.2 $2.4

$1.6 $1.4

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#34 #38 0.6% $719 #37 #44 #22 #25

$3.3 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.2% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$1.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

36,419 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$60.6 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 55

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 LOUISIANA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

West Baton Rouge

Vernon

Orleans

Bossier

St. Mary

Lafourche

St. Tammany

East Baton Rouge

Iberia

Jefferson

(M = millions)

$247.3 M

$244.5 M

$241.1 M

$230.7 M

$118.8 M

$96.0 M

$51.7 M

$39.3 M

$33.5 M

$29.3 M

Vernon

Bossier

Orleans

Rapides

Plaquemines

East Baton Rouge

Tangipahoa

Iberville

Lafayette

Calcasieu

$523.9 M

$518.6 M

$404.8 M

$64.2 M

$38.6 M

$37.5 M

$26.0 M

$22.7 M

$16.6 M

$11.5 M

Bossier

Bossier

Vernon

Vernon

East Baton Rouge

West Baton Rouge

St. Tammany

Orleans

JeffersonJefferson

Jefferson ______

Lafourche

St. Mary

Iberia

East Baton Rouge

Rapides

Tangipahoa

Lafayette Calcasieu

Iberville

Plaquemines

Orleans
STATE of North Carolina v. Reggie Leander SMITH.

No. 223P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Reggie Leander Smith, Pro Se.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, L. Johnson Britt, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 11th day of May 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Edward F. Feighan, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProCentury Corporation (“ProCentury”); 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.  ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for ProCentury and have:
 a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating toProCentury, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)  evaluated the effectiveness of ProCentury’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  disclosed in this report any change in ProCentury’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during ProCentury’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ProCentury’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.  ProCentury’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ProCentury’s auditors and theaudit committee of ProCentury’s board of directors:
 a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectProCentury’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in ProCentury’s internal control over financial reporting.      May 13, 2005   Date        /s/ Edward F. Feighan       Signature         Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer Title