alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1307 

To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 to require the 

Bureau of Land Management to provide a claimant of a small miner 

waiver from claim maintenance fees with a period of 60 days after 

written receipt of 1 or more defects is provided to the claimant by 

registered mail to cure the 1 or more defects or pay the claim maintenance fee, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2013 

Mr. YOUNG of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 

to require the Bureau of Land Management to provide 

a claimant of a small miner waiver from claim maintenance fees with a period of 60 days after written receipt 

of 1 or more defects is provided to the claimant by 

registered mail to cure the 1 or more defects or pay 

the claim maintenance fee, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1307 IH

1 SECTION 1. SMALL MINER WAIVERS TO CLAIM MAINTE2 NANCE FEES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10101(d)(3) of the Omni4 bus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 

5 28f(d)(3)) is amended by striking ‘‘for any reason, the 

6 claimant shall have a period of 60 days after receipt of 

7 written notification of the defect or defects by the Bureau 

8 of Land Management to:’’ and inserting ‘‘for any reason 

9 (including the failure to timely file a small miner’s mainte10 nance fee waiver application or an affidavit of annual labor 

11 associated with the application and required application 

12 fees), the claimant shall have a period of 60 days after 

13 receipt of written notification of the 1 or more defects pro14 vided by the Bureau of Land Management by registered 

15 mail to’’. 

16 (b) TRANSITION RULES.—The claimholder of claims 

17 numbered AA023149, AA023163, AA047913, AA047914, 

18 AA047915, AA047916, AA047917, AA047918, and 

19 AA047919 (as of December 29, 2004) shall be consid20 ered— 

21 (1) to have received a first half final certificate 

22 for application AA072648 (associated with the 

23 claims) before September 30, 1994; and 

24 (2) to qualify for relief under section 

25 10101(d)(3) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation 

26 Act of 1993 (30 U.S.C. 28f(d)(3)) and have the opVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:56 Mar 26, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1307.IH H1307

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1307 IH

1 portunity to cure under that section for any prior 

2 period for which 1 or more defects existed or there 

3 was a failure to pay claim maintenance fees. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE v. STEPHENS

No. COA05-93.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Wake (03CRS86325, 02CRS104735).

Case reported without published opinion. New trial.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5393 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ferro Boron. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 12, 2008 

Mr. BROWN of South Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Ferro Boron. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FERRO BORON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Ferro Boron (CAS No. 

11108–67–1) (provided for in 

subheading 7202.99.80) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5393 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Edward F. Feighan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProCentury Corporation (“ProCentury”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for ProCentury and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to ProCentury,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of ProCentury’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in ProCentury’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during ProCentury’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ProCentury’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ProCentury’s auditors and theaudit committee of ProCentury’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectProCentury’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in ProCentury’s internal control over financial reporting.November 9, 2007
Exhibit 10.2


    
      

    

    EXHIBIT
      10.2

    


    Narrative
      Summary of Board Action Establishing 

    Cash
      Bonus Plan for Fiscal 2006

    


    On
      July
      21, 2005, the Board of Directors of American Consumers, Inc. (the "Company"),
      acting upon the recommendation of the Board's Compensation Committee,
      established the Cash Bonus Plan applicable to the Company's executive officers
      with respect to Company performance during the fiscal year ending in May 2006.
      During
      fiscal 2006, the Company’s executive officers will be eligible to receive a
      discretionary cash bonus equal to a fixed percentage of the Company’s net income
      before taxes for such year. 

    


    Such
      action included establishment of the following potential bonus percentages
      for
      those executive officers who serve as directors of the Company (Mr. Richardson
      also qualifies as a "named executive officer" pursuant to Item 402(a)(3) of
      Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K):

    


    
      	
              Name:

            	
              Title:

            	
              Potential
                Bonus as a

              Percentage
                of Pre-Tax Income:

            
	 	 	 
	
              Michael
                A. Richardson

            	
              Chairman
                of the Board, President 

            	
              6%

            
	 	and Chief
              Executive
              Officer	 
	 	 	 
	
              Paul
                R. Cook

            	
              Executive
                Vice President, Treasurer 

            	
              4%

            
	 	and Chief
              Financial
              Officer 	 
	 	 	 
	
              Virgil
                E. Bishop

            	
              Vice
                President

            	
              3%

            


    

    


    These
      potential bonus percentages remained unchanged from fiscal year 2005 levels.
      The
      amount of any bonus ultimately paid will be determined in the discretion of
      the
      Compensation Committee. No bonuses were paid for fiscal 2005 due to the
      Company's net loss for the year.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5294 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the additional 0.2 

percent FUTA surtax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. HERGER (for himself and Mr. WELLER of Illinois) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the additional 0.2 percent FUTA surtax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF THE ADDITIONAL 0.2 PERCENT 

4 FUTA SURTAX AND REBATE OF PAYROLL 

5 TAXES PAID IN CALENDAR YEAR 2008. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3301 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 (relating to rate of tax) is amended 

8 by striking ‘‘equal to’’ and all that follows through ‘‘of 

9 the total wages’’ and inserting ‘‘equal to 6.0 percent of 

10 the total wages’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5294 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to remuneration paid after De3 cember 31, 2007. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Cedric Partee, Appellant, v James Conway, as Superintendent of Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 553]

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Mark H. Dadd, J.—Habeas Corpus). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Gorski, Martoche, Pine and Lawton, JJ.
#### DAVIS v. UNITED STATES.

No. 14434.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

June 26, 1953.

Walter Adams Davis, in pro. per.

Lester L. May, Asst. U. S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., Frank B. Potter, U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for appellee.

Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL and STRUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant' was convicted on his plea of not guilty, in Criminal No. 12966 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, of having unlawfully transferred marihuana in violation of Marihuana Tax Act of 1937, section 2591 (a), Title 26 U.S.C., and, on February 21, 1952, sentenced to serve six years. .

He did not appeal from that judgment, but in July, 1952, filed in that cause a motion, under section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C. to vacate the judgment. In it, in addition to general claims that the indictment and conviction were invalid, claims unsupported by any specific reason having any kind of validity, appellant put forward as his chief reliance the claim that his conviction was the result of entrapment.

The district judge, finding that there was no sufficient legal basis for the motion, denied it, and this appeal resulted.

Here, while urging upon us, as he urged below, that he was entrapped and, as he did there, his general claims that his conviction violated due process, he urges nothing which presents any valid reason for granting the motion.

In addition to the fact that he cannot use a section 2255 motion to retry his case, the record shows that he was represented below 'by counsel and that the defense of entrapment, which he now seeks to present, was fully presented and fairly charged on the trial.

*517The other matters which, by a kind of general complaint against his lot, he seeks to urge as reasons for setting the judgment aside, are in general not sufficiently specific and definite, and to the extent that they are, they present no valid reasons for granting his motion. Neither does a search of the record present any.

The judgment denying the motion is affirmed.
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350
                   (SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of, Comlink Communications Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Bell, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  August 10, 2006

By:  /s/ James Bell
     -----------------------------------------------
     James Bell, President, Chief Executive Officer,
     Chief Financial Officer and Director




















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.20

                                 Amendment No. 2
                             to Employment Agreement


         The Employment Agreement dated as of March 15, 1994, as amended by
Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 15, 1999 (the "Agreement"), between Ascent
Pediatrics, Inc. and Emmett Clemente is hereby amended as follows as of the 15th
day of March, 2000. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

         1. The reference in Section 1 to "March 15, 2000" is hereby deleted and
"March 15, 2001" is hereby substituted in lieu thereof.

         2. In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect, and all references in the Agreement to this "Agreement" shall mean the
Agreement as amended hereby.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as
of the day and year first set forth above.




                                      ASCENT PEDIATRICS, INC.


                                      By: /s/ Eliot Lurier
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:   Eliot Lurier
                                          Title:  Chief Financial Officer


                                      EMPLOYEE


                                          By: /s/ Emmett Clemente
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                  Emmett Clemente
IN RE D.R.M.

No. COA04-1526.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5100 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain semi-manufactured 

forms of gold. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2008 

Mr. SIMPSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain semimanufactured forms of gold. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN SEMI-MANUFACTURED FORMS OF 

4 GOLD. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.71.08 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5100 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPALFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. and Visant Corporation (collectively,the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2005 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Paul B. Carousso, principal financial officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 15, 2005 | /s/ Paul B. Carousso          |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                         | Paul B. Carousso              |
|                         | ***Vice President, Finance*** |

 

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 and shall not except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and this certification will not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the registrantspecifically incorporates it by reference.

 

----
STATE v. PARDUE.

No. COA05-49.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Wilkes (04CRS50465, 04CRS1771, 04CRS1772).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Opinion issued February 15, 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 0 0668
- CV

——————————— WILLOW CREEK GOLF CLUB, INC. , Appellant V. WILLOW CREEK MANAGEMENT, INC. AND ALL OCCUPANTS , Appellee s
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1199219

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Willow Creek Golf Club, Inc., filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s August 7 , 2023 order

. On Febr uary 7 , 2024, appellant filed a m otion to d ismiss this a ppeal, stating that appellant and appellees, Willow Creek Management, Inc. and all occupants , had entered into a “Full Release and Settlement Agreement .”2

Accordingly, “pursuant to and consistent with” that settlement agreement, appellant request ed that the Court dismiss its appeal. The motion further requested that court costs be taxed against “ the party incurring same.”
No other party has filed a notice of appeal , and no opinion has issued. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 42.1 (a)(1), (c). Appellant ’ s motion includes a certificate of conference stating that appellee s are agre ed to the relief requested in the motion. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a)(2). Accordingly, the Court grants appellant ’ s motion and dismiss es the appeal.
See T EX
. R. A PP . P. 42.1(a) (1), 43.2(f)

. We direct the Clerk of this Court that costs are to be taxed against the party incurring them. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1 (d)

. We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris

.
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 39803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14174]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), Article 1904; 
Binational Panel Review: Notice of Panel Decision

AGENCY: United States Section, NAFTA Secretariat, International Trade 
Administration, Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of panel decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 27, 2022, the Binational Panel issued its Decision in 
the matter of Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico; Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (Secretariat File 
Number: USA-MEX-2019-1904-01). The Binational Panel affirmed the 
Department of Commerce's Final Determination.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vidya Desai, United States Secretary, 
NAFTA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 
DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Chapter 19 of Article 1904 of NAFTA provides 
a dispute settlement mechanism involving trade remedy determinations 
issued by the Government of the United States, the Government of 
Canada, and the Government of Mexico. Following a Request for Panel 
Review, a Binational Panel is composed to provide judicial review of 
the trade remedy determination being challenged and then issue a 
binding Panel Decision. There are established Rules of Procedure for 
Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews, which were adopted by the three 
governments for panels requested pursuant to Article 1904(2) of NAFTA. 
The notice of this Binational Panel's Decision is being published 
pursuant to Rule 70. For the complete Rules, please see https://can-mex-usa-sec.org/secretariat/agreement-accord-acuerdo/nafta-alena-tlcan/rules-regles-reglas/article-article-articulo_1904.aspx?lang=eng.

    Dated: June 28, 2022.
Vidya Desai,
U.S. Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2022-14174 Filed 7-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
```