alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Jevon MASSEY.

No. 484P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Timothy J. Massey, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th day of September 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Harnett County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
STATE v. Randall GREENOUGH.

No. 151P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, James E. Hardin, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of March 2005 by Defendant for Appropriate Relief:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of April 2005."
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telex Communications Intermediate
Holdings, LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Periodic Report"), Raymond V. Malpocher, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Gregory W. Richter, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:

      (1)   The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of September 30, 2004.

/s/ Raymond V. Malpocher
-----------------------------------------

Raymond V. Malpocher
President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: November 3, 2004

/s/ Gregory W. Richter
-----------------------------------------

Gregory W. Richter
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dated: November 3, 2004
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5210 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Black NBR rubber O-ring, 3150 

millimeters diameter, 9896 millimeters circumference. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Black NBR rubber 

O-ring, 3150 millimeters diameter, 9896 millimeters circumference. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BLACK NBR RUBBER O-RING, 3150 MILLIME4 TERS DIAMETER, 9896 MILLIMETERS CIRCUM5 FERENCE. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

HR 5210 IH 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Black NBR rubber O-ring, 

3150 millimeters diameter, 

9896 millimeters circumference (provided for in subheading 4016.93.50) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE v. PETERSON

No. COA04-573

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 3, 2005.

Certification Date May 23, 2005.

Appeal from the New Hanover (02CRS18448, 02CRS18449, 02CRS18450, 02CRS18451, 02CRS18452, 02CRS20446, 02CRS20447).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
IN RE D.B.B.

No. COA04-1692

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from New Hanover (04J231).

Cases reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
STATE of North Carolina v. Roger Wayne EDWARDS.

No. 332P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Don Willey, for Roger Wayne Edwards.

Patricia Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Michael K. Lands, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of June 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."
Thomas Wayne HUNT, Employee v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Employer, Self-Insured, (Key Risk Management Services, Servicing Agent).

No. 545P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Charles M. Tighe, for Thomas Wayne Hunt.

Sharon Patrick-Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Dept. of Correction.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of September 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
IN RE J.S.

No. COA04-1517.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 3, 2006.

Certification Date January 23, 2006.

Appeal from Cumberland (01J255, 01J256).

Case without published opinion. Dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 17, 2009 

0414 

Order 

 

April 17, 2009 

138433 & (12)(13) 

THOMAS WELGOSH and MARIE ANNE 

WELGOSH, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 138433 

 COA: 290196 

Oakland CC: 2002-042140-CH 

TRI-MOUNT CUSTOM HOMES, INC., and 

MARK DEMBS, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court before consideration by the Court of Appeals. 

The motion to stay arbitration proceedings is DENIED as moot.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
6, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Cox Radio, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 1997, in the following Registration Statements of Cox
Radio, Inc.:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
FORM                                                          FILE NO.
----                                                          ---------
<S>                                                           <C>
S-8.........................................................  333-13281
S-8.........................................................  333-26417
</TABLE>

Atlanta, Georgia
March 27, 1998
# Introduction

mailto:tara.a.butler4.civ@mail.mil

# Table of Contents

# 1.Contract Spending by State

# 2.Contract Spending by Cnty

# 3.Top Defense Vendors

# 4.Contract Spending by Type

# 5.Contract Spending by Svc

# 6.DoD Personnel Nbrs, by State

# 7.DoD Personnel Nbrs, by Cnty

# 8.DoD Personnel by Type

# 9.DoD Personnel by Service

# 10.DoD Prnl Spending, by State

# 11.DoD Prnl Spending, by Cnty

# 12.Grant Spending by State

# 13.Ttl Def. Spending by State

# 14.Def Spending as % State GDP

# 15.Pct of Ttl U.S. Def. Spend

# 16.Def. Spending per Resident

# 17.All Stats, FY2022
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5288 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bis(4-fluorophenyl)methanone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. FERGUSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bis(4- 

fluorophenyl)methanone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BIS(4-FLUOROPHENYL)METHANONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.32.85 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Bis(4-fluorophenyl)methanone) is amended by striking 

7 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5288 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. Mark T. PIECZYNSKI.

No. 509P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 14, 2005.

Mark T. Pieczynski, Pro Se.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 9th day of September 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 14th day of September 2005."
Exhibit
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of International Food Products
      Group, Inc. (the “ ***Company*** ”),
      for
      the year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “ ***Report*** ”),
      I,
      Richard Damion, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      do
      hereby certify, to my knowledge that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Richard Damion


__________________________________________


Richard
      Damion


Chief
      Executive Officer





Dated:  October
      31, 2006








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      International Food Products Group, Inc. and will be retained by International
      Food Products Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of ZHONGPIN  INC.  (the
"Company")  for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Xianfu Zhu, as Chief
Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:    September 18, 2006               By:/s/ Xianfu Zhu
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Xianfu Zhu
                                             Chief Executive Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This  certification  accompanies each  Report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and  furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### RESEARCH PRODUCTS COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Oveta Culp HOBBY, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare.

No. 14671.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

June 19, 1953.

Miller & Sharp, Topeka, Kan., for petitioner.

William W. Goodrich, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Food and Drug Division, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D. C., Charles B. Murray, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Vincent A. Kleinfeld, Atty., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Review of Order of Federal Security Administrator promulgated May 12, 1952, dismissed, on motion of counsel for petitioner, counsel for respondent not objecting.
STATE v. MOSES.

No. COA05-434.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed January 17, 2006.

Certification Date February 6, 2006.

Appeal from Anson (03CRS52235).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
H. R. 5168 

One Hundred Tenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eight 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 19101 

Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, as the ‘‘Cody Grater Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CODY GRATER POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 19101 Cortez Boulevard in Brooksville, Florida, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Cody Grater Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Cody Grater Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. About
3. Year in Review 2023

**2023 Year in Review** *Fiscal year 2023 was a banner year for the National Ocean Service, highlighted by the release of a new strategic plan that will guide our efforts through 2028. As you review this report, note how all of our activities align with our key strategic priorities. These accomplishments demonstrate how we are leveraging our broad expertise to meet the nation's growing need for ocean and coastal products and services. We hope you take some time to review the many actions NOS has taken, innovative projects we've completed, and scientific endeavors we embarked upon in the past fiscal year.*     Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services
 Coral Reef Conservation Program
  U.S. INTEGRATED OCEAN OBSERVING SYSTEM
  National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
 National Geodetic Survey
  NOS Management and Budget
  NOS Information Management Office
 Office for Coastal Management
  Office of Coast Survey
  Office of National Marine Sanctuaries
 Office of Response and Restoration


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
HomeOcean Facts

# Are all algal blooms harmful?

## No, not all algal blooms are harmful. 

VIDEO: Learn how scientists predict the spread of harmful algal blooms in this video from Ocean Today. 

There are thousands of species of algae; most are beneficial and only a few of these produce toxins or have other harmful effects. Harmful algal blooms are blooms of species of algae that can have negative impacts on humans, marine and freshwater environments, and coastal economies.  These blooms occur when phytoplankton, which are tiny microscopic plants, grow  quickly in large quantities while producing toxic or harmful effects on people,  fish, shellfish, marine mammals, and birds.

A bloom does not have to produce toxins in order to be  harmful to the environment. It can also be harmful by causing anoxic conditions  where oxygen is depleted from the water. Blooms can block light to organisms  lower in the water column, or even clog or harm fish gills.

Not all algal blooms are harmful, some can actually be beneficial.  Phytoplankton are found at the base of the marine food chain therefore all  other life in the ocean relies on phytoplankton. Blooms can also be a good  indicator of environmental change not only in the water, but also on land. 

###### **Search** Our Facts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          -  National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science 
          -  What is a harmful algal bloom? (audio podcast)

**Last updated:**   01/20/23**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
114 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Northrop Grumman $35.8 M

AMS Group $14.3 M

NextGen Federal Systems $13.9 M

Civil-Military Innovation Institute, Inc. $13.2 M

HDD JV $10.4 M

Touchstone Research Laboratory, Ltd. $6.5 M

MCW-TMG1, LLC $5.7 M

4D Tech Solutions, Inc. $3.9 M

Loar Group, Inc. $3.5 M

Marshall University Research Corp. $3.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

WEST VIRGINIA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$364.6 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

9,627

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Kanawha 28 399 1,454 346 2,227

Berkeley ND 222 1,302 38 ND

Preston 0 63 501 64 628

Cabell ND 597 0 ND ND

Putnam 0 110 388 56 554

Wood ND 59 320 67 ND

Fayette ND 13 408 ND ND

Mercer ND ND 104 262 ND

Wayne 0 39 243 59 341

Ohio ND 76 111 109 ND

Construction: 13%

Research and

Development: 21% Service: 25%

Supplies and

Equipment: 41%

Active Duty: 1%

Civilian: 20%

National Guard: 63%

Reserve: 16%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

53%

7%

18%

21%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

73%

2%

25%

1%

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2

$0.1

$0.4

$0.5

$0.1

$0.2

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#50 #49 0.1% $338 #51 #38 #46 #48

$0.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.6% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

9,627 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$69.0 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 115

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Ohio

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

Ohio

Preston

Marion

WEST VIRGINIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Mineral

Monongalia

Berkeley

Jefferson

Kanawha

Ohio

Cabell

Preston

Marion

Mason

(M = millions)

$38.8 M

$33.2 M

$20.7 M

$15.7 M

$11.3 M

$8.3 M

$5.3 M

$4.6 M

$4.3 M

$3.5 M

Kanawha

Berkeley

Cabell

Preston

Putnam

Wood

Wayne

Harrison

Ohio

Fayette

$103.2 M

$57.3 M

$49.6 M

$24.6 M

$17.8 M

$15.0 M

$10.1 M

$9.8 M

$9.2 M

$9.2 M

Mason

Kanawha

Cabell

Monongalia

Mineral Berkeley

Jefferson

Wood

Putnam

Wayne Fayette

Cabell

Kanawha

Preston

Berkeley

Harrison