alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ivan Anthony GRAHAM v. Theodis BECK, Secretary of Prison.

No. 347P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 27, 2005.

Ivan Anthony Graham, pro se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of N.C.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Plaintiff on the 24th day of June 2005 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, New Hanover County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th day of June 2005."
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.



|                   |  |                                         |  |                                                                                                       
|------------------ |  | --------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | BANK OF THE JAMES FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
|                   |  |                                        
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  | By                                      |  | /S/ Robert R. Chapman III                                                                             
|                   |  |                                         |  | Robert R. Chapman III President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)                            
|                   |  |                                        
|Date: May 12, 2006 |  | By                                      |  | /S/ J. Todd Scruggs                                                                                   
|                   |  |                                         |  | J. Todd Scruggs Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
STATE v. MILES

No. COA04-345

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed May 17, 2005

Certification Date June 6, 2005

Appeal from New Hanover (01CRS14075, 01CRS14076).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Linda WILSON v. Denis VENTRIGLIA.

No. 501P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Renny W. Deese, Fayetteville, for Ventriglia.

Ralph S. Pennington, James W. Lea, III, Wilmington, for Wilson.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 19th day of September 2005 *637by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul B. Carousso, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Paul B. Carousso         
|                        |  |  |  | Paul B. Carousso             
|                        |  |  |  | Vice President, Finance      
|                        |  |  |  | (principal financial officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Benji COLLINS.

No. 430P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, William David McFadyen, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 10th day of August 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Craven County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of August 2005."
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Green Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, J. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

Dated this 23rdday of July, 2007.

J. DOUGLAS FRATERJ. Douglas Frater, President and Chief Executive Officer





















---
HomeOcean Facts

# How is ocean observing data used?

## Ocean observing data  helps the nation track, predict, manage, and adapt to changes in the  marine environment.

Coastal communities use ocean observing  data to prepare for floods and other natural disasters. 

NOAA orchestrates the collection of ocean data through a federal, regional, and private-sector partnership called the U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System, or IOOS®. This system helps the nation track, predict, manage, and adapt to changes in our  marine environment.

 IOOS data are increasing our understanding of how oceans  drive storms to allow meteorologists to develop earlier, more accurate weather  predictions. Store  managers use these forecasts to decide whether to stock hurricane supplies or  beach towels in their stores. Fishermen typically use weather and water data to  make informed decisions about when it is safe to head to sea. 

Through state-of-the-art  high  frequency radar systems and other technologies, IOOS scientists can also  track ocean currents in near  real time. By improving our ability  to monitor the speed and direction of surface  currents, search and rescue crews can track the probable path of people lost at sea and expedite  recovery time. 

Surface current maps also support other  scientific work including oil spill response, harmful algal bloom monitoring,  and water quality assessments. Responders use IOOS data to track oil slicks after  a spill because the real-time data shows the movement of the water and  therefore the movement of the spill. Data on ocean currents  helps  forecasters predict both the movement and size of harmful algal blooms, so they  can act to decrease health risks to people who might have been affected  otherwise.

###### **Search** Our Facts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - NOAA Integrated Ocean Observing System Program
          - What is IOOS? (audio podcast) 

**Last updated:**   01/27/23**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Six, Inc., (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company as of March 31, 2011, and for the period then ended.

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/   GLADE M. KNIGHT   | 
|                        | 
|Glade M. Knight         | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|May 6, 2011             | 
|                        | 
|/s/   BRYAN PEERY       | 
|                        | 
|Bryan Peery             | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|                        | 
|May 6, 2011             | 

---
36 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

FLORIDA 

#5

$30.1 B SPENT IN 

#20

2.3% OF STATE GDP

5.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,384

PER RESIDENT 

#5

$21.7 B CONTRACT 

#5

135,855 NUMBER 

#4

$8.4 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 3% Development: 6%

Service: 35%

Supplies and

Equipment: 56%

By Service 

Army

13%

Navy/Marines

40%

Air Force

24%

Other Defense

22%

Top Defense Contractors 

Lockheed Martin

Abbott Laboratories

Northrop Grumman

L3Harris Technologies

Leonardo SpA

Crowley

Raytheon Technologies

General Dynamics

Jacobs

Sierra Nevada Corp.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$6.3 B

$1.7 B

$1.4 B

$476.9 M

$435.7 M

$413.2 M

$368.6 M

$359.3 M

$273.2 M

$204.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$22.1 $21.7

$18.8

$15.2 $15.5 $14.2

$9.6 $9.7

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 18%

National 

Guard: 9%

Active Duty: 47%

Civilian: 25%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

23%

Navy/Marines

41%

Air Force

34%

Other Defense

2%

$ 8.4 BILLION 135,855

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

Okaloosa 18,720 7,677 121 2,448 28,966

Duval 13,598 9,092 1,988 4,073 28,751

Escambia 12,274 2,584 179 1,004 16,041

Hillsborough 5,922 2,894 479 4,498 13,793

Miami-Dade 1,129 1,361 323 3,790 6,603

Bay 2,652 3,006 539 237 6,434

Orange 269 2,471 362 3,101 6,203

Brevard 1,628 2,594 388 1,352 5,962

Pinellas 78 361 802 1,025 2,266

Palm Beach 73 237 388 1,103 1,801
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

 

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FLORIDA 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Orange

Brevard

Hillsborough

Duval

Okaloosa

Pinellas

Bay

Miami-Dade

Escambia

Broward

(M = millions, B = billions)

$7.7 B 

$4.5 B 

$2.0 B 

$1.7 B 

$1.7 B 

$767.6 M 

$698.2 M 

$479.3 M 

$467.4 M 

$240.4 M 

Okaloosa

Duval

Hillsborough

Escambia

Bay

Brevard

Orange

Miami-Dade

Santa Rosa

Monroe

$2.1 B 

$1.9 B 

$926.4 M 

$754.1 M 

$502.6 M 

$395.7 M 

$360.7 M 

$356.0 M 

$129.7 M 

$106.1 M 

Bay

Escambia Okaloosa

Santa Rosa

Duval

Orange

Brevard

Hillsborough

Miami-Dade

Monroe

Bay

Duval

Orange

Brevard Pinellas

Hillsborough

Broward

Miami-Dade

Escambia Okaloosa

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 37
STATE of North Carolina v. Gene Archer DICKENS, Jr.

No. 15P04-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Gene Archer Dickens, Jr., Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*114*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 29th day of August 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Martin County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
Air Force

Army

Navy/Marines

Other Defense

3%

60%

19%

18%

$0.5

$0.6

$0.5

$0.3

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2

$0.3

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

70%

2%

27%

1%

Construcon: 1%

Research and

 Development: 1%

Service: 20%

Supplies and

 Equipment: 78%

Acve Duty: 3% Civilian: 14%

Naonal Guard/

Reserve: 83%

General Dynamics

United Technologies

D. A. Collins Construcon

New England Woodcra

VAE, Inc.

Burns & McDonnell

Norwich University

Task Source

Pond & Company

Vermont Aerospace Manufacturing

$145.2 M

$40.2 M

$18.9 M

$9.7 M

$6.2 M

$3.0 M

$2.8 M

$2.3 M

$1.9 M

$1.7 M

Chienden

Washington

Windsor

Rutland

Franklin

Caledonia

Bennington

Windham

Orange

Lamoille

County

2,867

424

245

218

209

89

87

86

79

78

Total*

85

32

10

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Acve Duty

   Military

567

14

19

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Civilian

 FISCAL YEAR 2017

VERMONT

   DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions)

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

   DEFENSE PERSONNEL

Allocaons, By Type

Allocaons, By Service

$136.3 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

4,474

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locaons

*Total also includes uniformed Naonal Guard and Reserve units.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

106 Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017
AF Guard Army Guard

VERMONT VERMONT

#50 #31 0.1% $705 #44 #51 #51

$0.4 B

SPENT IN STATE

1.3% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S.

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.3 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

4,474 NUMBER

OF PERSONNEL

$0.1 B PERSONNEL

SPENDING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K=thousands M=millions)

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Chitenden County

$195.9 M

Addison County

$46.7 M

Rutland County

$10.6 M

Washington County

$5.5 M

Caledonia County

$2.2 M

Windsor County

$1.7 M

Orange County

$1.2 M

Windham County

$702.1 K

Bennington County

$446.9 K

Lamoille County

$322.4 K

Chitenden

Addison

Rutland

Washington

Caledonia

Windsor

Orange

Windham

Bennington

Lamoille

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (K=thousands M=millions)

NEW HAMPSHIRE

Chitenden County

$106.1 M

Washington County

$11.6 M

Windsor County

$5.1 M

Franklin County

$3.5 M

Rutland County

$3.2 M

Caledonia County

$1.2 M

Windham County

$1.1 M

Lamoille County

$1.0 M

Addison County

$964.6 K

Orange County

$947.1 K

Chitenden

Washington

Windsor

Franklin

Rutland

Caledonia

Windham

Lamoille

Addison Orange

Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017 107
STATE of North Carolina v. David LOVE.

No. 198P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

David Love, Pro Se.

*539Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 12th day of April 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

(1)         this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)         the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gander Mountain Company.

Dated:  December 7, 2006
|     | /s/ Mark R. Baker                       |   |
|----------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|     | Mark R. Baker                           |
| * * | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
| * * | * *                                |
| * * | * *                                |
|     | /s/ Dennis M. Lindahl                   |   |
|     | Dennis M. Lindahl                       |
| * * | *Executive Vice President,*             |
|     | *Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer* |

 

----
TUCKER v. STEGALL MILLING CO., INC.

COA03-913.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 3, 2004.

Certification Date August 23, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN RE A.P.R.

No. COA04-1372

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed August 16, 2005

Certification Date September 6, 2005

Appeal from Alamance (02J50, 02J51).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Six, Inc., (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of
operations of the Company as of June 30, 2010, and for the period then ended.

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/   GLADE
 M. KNIGHT  | 
|                        | 
|Glade M. Knight         | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|August 3,
 2010         | 
|                        | 
|/s/   BRYAN
 PEERY      | 
|                        | 
|Bryan Peery             | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 
|                        | 
|August 3,
 2010         | 

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Marc L. Reisch                   
|                      |  | Marc L. Reisch                       
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | (principal executive officer)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citigroup Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer Magro

|
|
|
|

Jennifer Magro
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director

Date:November 14, 2007

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5208 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1.25 inch Stainless Steel Tee Pipe 

Fitting. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1.25 inch Stainless 

Steel Tee Pipe Fitting. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1.25 INCH STAINLESS STEEL TEE PIPE FITTING. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1.25 inch Stainless Steel Tee 

Pipe Fitting (provided for in 

subheading 7307.29.00) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

HR 5208 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS