alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 117 (Friday, June 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36520-36521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13062]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial

[[Page 36521]]

property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: July 12, 2022.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Annie Walker-Abbey, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-627-3390, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: June 13, 2022.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-13062 Filed 6-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.3


                      CONSENT OF ELMS, FARIS & CO., P.C.


The Board of Directors
Costilla Energy, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-16513, No. 333-16515 and No. 333-16517) on Form S-8 of our report dated
March 31, 1995, relating to the consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 1994 of the
predecessor entities of Costilla Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries, which report
appears in the December 31, 1996, annual report on Form 10-K of Costilla Energy,
Inc.



                                       ELMS, FARIS & CO., P.C.

Midland, Texas
March 25, 1997
(function ($, Drupal, once) {
  Drupal.behaviors.npin_active_trail = {
    attach: function (context, settings) {
      var menus = once('npin-active-trail', '.usa-layout-docs__sidenav .menu, .tb-megamenu-nav', context);

      if (menus.length) {
        let path = location.pathname;

        if (path.indexOf('/dashboard') !== -1) {
          path = '/dashboard';
        }

        $('a[href="' + path + '"]', menus)
          .addClass(['active', 'active-trail', 'is-active'])
          .parent('li')
          .addClass(['active', 'active-trail']);
      }

      // Check if mega menu links have an .active class.
      // If they do, attach .active class to the current tab.
      function tb_megamenu_find_active_tab() {
        $(".tbm-main").each(function () {
          let $megaMenuItem = $(this).find('.active').parents('.tbm-item');
          $megaMenuItem.eq(0).addClass('active');
        });
      }
      tb_megamenu_find_active_tab();

    }
  }
})(jQuery, Drupal, once)
EXHIBIT 23(b)

NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 provides that in case any part of a registration statement, when such part became effective, contained an
untrue statement of a material fact, or omitted to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a security
pursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the time of such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may sue, among others, an accountant who has with his
consent been named as having certified any part of the registration statement, or as having prepared any report which is used in connection with the registration statement.

On
May 8, 2002, the Company dismissed Arthur Andersen LLP ("Arthur Andersen") as its independent auditors. After reasonable efforts, the Company has been unable to obtain Arthur
Andersen's written consent to the incorporation by reference of Arthur Andersen's audit report with respect to the Company's consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2001 and 2000 into its previously filed registration statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-58138 and 333-16705) and
Form S-3 (File No. 333-85409). Such audit report is included in this Form 10-K.

Under
these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act of 1933 permits the Company to file this Form 10-K, which is incorporated by reference into the
above listed registration statements, without a written consent from Arthur Andersen. However, as a result, Arthur Andersen will not have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act
for any untrue statements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited by Arthur Andersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein. Accordingly, you would
be unable to assert a claim against Arthur Andersen under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act.

---

QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1523 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1523

   To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for a new rule 
   regarding the application of the Act to marihuana, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2013

   Mr. Rohrabacher (for himself, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. 
 Polis, Mr. Amash, and Mr. Blumenauer) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition 
      to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Controlled Substances Act to provide for a new rule 
   regarding the application of the Act to marihuana, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Respect State Marijuana Laws Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. RULE REGARDING APPLICATION TO MARIHUANA.

    Part G of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 710. RULE REGARDING APPLICATION TO MARIHUANA.

    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the provisions of 
this subchapter related to marihuana shall not apply to any person 
acting in compliance with State laws relating to the production, 
possession, distribution, dispensation, administration, or delivery of 
marihuana.''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2016286EN.01000301.xml

| 21.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 286/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 286/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1865

of 10 October 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Šoltansko maslinovo ulje (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Šoltansko maslinovo ulje’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Šoltansko maslinovo ulje’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Šoltansko maslinovo ulje’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Šoltansko maslinovo ulje’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Šoltansko maslinovo ulje’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.5. Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oil, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 October 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 195, 2.6.2016, p. 15.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
74 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Sierra Nevada Corp. $1.0 B

MSATSL $116.9 M

M1 Support Services $103.2 M

AECOM $82.3 M

JT4 $77.8 M

Day & Zimmermann Group $66.6 M

J.E. Dunn Construction $50.0 M

Draken International Inc. $45.0 M

Cerberus Capital Management $41.2 M

Korte Construction Co. (KCC) $28.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NEVADA

#33 #29 0.6% $1,023 #33 #34 #31

$3.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.8% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $2.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

21,280 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.1 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

21,280

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Clark 10,074 1,707 1,906 3,162 16,849

Washoe 55 378 1,827 123 2,383

Churchill 894 285 81 44 1,304

Carson City ND 197 394 ND

Mineral ND 44 ND ND

White Pine ND ND 35 ND

Elko ND ND 22 ND

Storey ND ND ND ND

Douglas ND ND ND ND

Pershing ND ND ND ND

Construction: 4%

Research and

Development: 5%

Service: 63%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 28%

Active Duty: 52%

Civilian: 12%

National 

Guard: 20%

Reserve: 16%

10%

13%

61%

17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

24%

9%

66%

1%

$1.5

$1.2

$2.0

$1.4 $1.3 $1.4 $1.6

$2.0

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 75

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Elko

Churchill

Lyon

Storey

Carson City

Nye

Douglas Mineral

Clark

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEVADA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Washoe

Clark

Churchill

Storey

Mineral

Douglas

Lyon

Carson City

Nye

Elko

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$1.0 B

$656.8 M

$197.5 M

$68.4 M

$67.6 M

$19.0 M

$17.8 M

$8.4 M

$5.9 M

$479.2 K

Clark

Churchill

Washoe

Carson City

Mineral

Storey

White Pine

Douglas

Elko

Pershing

$873.0 M

$85.0 M

$66.8 M

$30.0 M

$3.4 M

$681.9 K

$302.8 K

$293.8 K

$252.1 K

$107.9 K

Elko

Washoe

Pershing

White Pine

Churchill

Carson City

Mineral

Clark

Washoe

Storey

Douglas
64 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MINNESOTA 

#39 

$2.2 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#50

0.5% OF STATE GDP

0.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$387 

PER RESIDENT 

#39 

$1.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#34

21,636 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#39 

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and 

Construction: 2% Development: 7%

Service: 10%

Supplies and Equipment: 81%

By Service 

Army

40%

Navy/Marines

32%

Air Force

11%

Other Defense

18%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 2%

Civilian: 13%

Reserve: 25%

National Guard: 60%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

72%

Navy/Marines

6%

Air Force

21%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors 

Northrop Grumman

BAE Systems

Cummins

3M

Honeywell

General Dynamics

Raytheon Technologies

Alliant Techsystems Operations

UnitedHealth Group

Polaris Industries

(M = millions)

$340.7 M

$274.9 M

$98.1 M

$77.7 M

$73.5 M

$67.0 M

$41.1 M

$35.4 M

$30.8 M

$27.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.1 $4.0 $3.5 $3.3

FY14

$2.8

FY15

$2.1

FY16 FY17

$1.8

FY18

$1.5

FY19 FY20 FY21

$695.7 MILLION 21,636

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Hennepin 353 698 1,639

Ramsey 55 944 2,003

Morrison ND 437 1,628

St. Louis 13 301 1,442

Washington 0 12 807 

Dakota ND 58 718 

Stearns ND 105 332 

Blue Earth 27 12 222 

Crow Wing 24 22 219 

Wright ND ND 152 

Reserve

3,657

869

0 

98 

0 

0 

118 

126

76

139 

Total

6,347

3,871

ND 

1,854

819 

ND 

ND 

387 

341 

ND 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MINNESOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Hennepin

Anoka

Ramsey

Dakota

Washington

Sherburne

St. Louis

Olmsted

Morrison

Carver

(M = millions)

$752.5 M

$404.9 M

$103.7 M

$85.9 M

$28.7 M

$16.8 M

$13.3 M

$8.2 M

$7.5 M

$5.8 M

Hennepin

Ramsey

Morrison

St. Louis

Dakota

Washington

Stearns

Blue Earth

Crow Wing

Winona

$231.0 M

$149.9 M

$59.5 M

$58.6 M

$27.7 M

$19.9 M

$19.5 M

$12.4 M

$12.4 M

$7.9 M 

St. Louis

Morrison

Anoka

Hennepin Washington

Ramsey

Carver Dakota

Olmsted

Morrison

Stearns

Hennepin Washington

Ramsey

Dakota

Winona

Blue Earth

Crow Wing

Sherburne

St. Louis

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 6

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

5
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telex Communications Intermediate
Holdings, LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Periodic Report"), Raymond V. Malpocher, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Gregory W. Richter, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company as of June 30, 2004.

/s/ Raymond V. Malpocher
-------------------------------------
Raymond V. Malpocher
President and Chief Executive Officer
Dated: August 2, 2004

/s/ Gregory W. Richter
------------------------------------------
Gregory W. Richter
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Dated: August 2, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of National Beef Packing Company, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended February 28, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jay D. Nielsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



By:

/s/ JAY D. NIELSENJay D. Nielsen Chief Financial Officer




Date: April 14, 2004
- Home
- Facts
- What is a navigation response team?

# **What is a navigation response team?**

## Navigation response teams maintain **emergency readiness while checking chart accuracy** in changing ports and harbors. 

*A NOAA Navigation Response Team vessel. These boats feature both depth-finding and sidescan sonar systems for detecting dangerous obstructions on the ocean floor.*

NOAA's navigation response teams, part of the Office of Coast Survey, survey the seafloor in ports and harbors that have undergone infrastructure updates, shoreline alterations, or seafloor changes. They measure depths and look for underwater hazards that could endanger vessels, to update nautical charts for commercial and recreational mariners.

Coast Survey strategically places navigation teams around the country. While 80 percent of their time is spent acquiring data for chart updates, they must also maintain a state of readiness for rapid mobilization for response after emergencies.

##### More **Information**

Office of Coast Survey 

Conducting Survey Operations

 Hydrographic Surveying 

 NOAA's Navigation Response Teams

##### **Last updated:**

###### 						 1/04/21					

**Author:** NOAA

How to cite this article

Contact Us

##### 					Feedback

              -  Provide Feedback 
              -  Contact Us
              -  Report an error

##### 					Social

              - 
              - 
              - 
*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
							About NOS						- About Us
- NOS Program Offices
- Media Inquiries
- Website Acknowledgements
- Site Index
- Disclaimer
							More Resources						- Freedom of Information Act
- Accessibility
- Information Quality
- Privacy Policy
- NOS For Employees
- USA.gov
-  Department of Commerce
-  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
-  National Ocean Service
Exhibit 10.2











January 2011
  Ofer Zadikario
 Ra’anana
  Dear Ofer:
 
 I’m pleased to inform you that the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has approved your 2011 compensation as follows:
  Base Salary:

MBO Target:

Annual Commission Target:
66,000 NIS per month

$7,500 per quarter

$30,000 annually
  Your compensation increase will be effective as of 1-April-2011.
 
 Additionally, at its meeting on 13-January-2011, the Committee approved a grant to you of 70,000 options to purchase 70,000 common shares of the Company, with an exercise price of $15.12 each.  A formal grant letter will be sent to you shortly.
 
 Best regards,
 
 Gal Trifon
 CEO
 
 Cc: Ruth Shaked, VP HR
  MediaMind Technologies Ltd. 25 Haharoshet St., Ra'anana 43656, Israel t. +972 9 776 0800 f. +972 9 741 3338
ELLEDGE v. AUSTIN

No. COA04-1003.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Iredell (02CVS2468).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 49

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1300 North Frontage Road West in Vail, 

Colorado, as the ‘‘Gerald R. Ford, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 49 EH

1 SECTION 1. GERALD R. FORD, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 1300 North Frontage Road West 

4 in Vail, Colorado, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Gerald R. Ford, Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Gerald R. Ford, Jr. 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 29, 

2007. 

Attest:

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 49

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States PostJr. Post Office Building’’. West in Vail, Colorado, as the ‘‘Gerald R. Ford, al Service located at 1300 North Frontage Road
April Dawn GILBERT a/k/a April Dawn Wright, and Denise Marie Dixon and Angela Bogue v. HPS REAL ESTATE, INC., formerly Ralph Huff Realty, Inc., Ralph Huff, individually and d/b/a Coldwell Banker, Phil Guy, individually, and Matthew J. Watts a/k/a Rick Watts, individually.

No. 503P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Carmen J. Battle, Fayetteville, for April Dawn Gilbert, et al.

*690James H. Locus, Jr., Fayetteville, for Matthew Watts.

Ann S. Estridge, M. Robin Davis, Raleigh, for HPS Real Estate, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 23rd day of September 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00245-CV

IN RE J.B. RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: June 22, 2012

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).