alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       14,902,578
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 5,270,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                  2,554,705
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             20,161,972
<PP&E>                                       11,658,926
<DEPRECIATION>                                6,185,441
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               26,504,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         2,586,561
<BONDS>                                         488,579
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         12,331
<OTHER-SE>                                   23,665,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 26,504,537
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             18,821,125
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              3,870,925
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              111,578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,745,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (848,267)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,897,010)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,897,010)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.48)


</TABLE>
SURBER v. ROCKINGHAM COUNTY BD. OF EDUC.

No. COA05-170.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed November 15, 2005.

Certification Date December 5, 2005

Appeal from the NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #310814).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Appeal dismissed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

ISO-DIAGNOSTICS TESTING, INC. a/a/o GERARDO GONZALEZ,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-2475

[January 31, 2024]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Kathleen McHugh, Judge; L.T. Case No. COCE21-29607.

Lissette Gonzalez and Francesca M. Stein of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., 

Miami, for appellant.

Mac S. Phillips of Phillips | Tadros, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, United Automobile Insurance Company, appeals a judgment 

in favor of a medical provider, ISO-Diagnostics Testing, Inc. (“ISO”), for PIP 

benefits. The trial court ruled in ISO’s favor on its claim that, pursuant to 

the policy, United owed additional PIP payments because United had 

improperly paid ISO based on the 2017 Medicare Schedule of Payments, 

rather than the higher 2018 schedule. We have recently decided this exact 

issue involving a United PIP policy with the similar relevant policy 

language against the same provider in United Automobile Insurance Co. vs. 

ISO-Diagnostics Testing, Inc., a/a/o Suryma Pineiro Morales, No. 4D2022-

1735, --- So. 3d ---, 2024 WL 103664 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 10, 2024). We 

reversed the judgment for ISO and held that “under the plain meaning of 

the policy and the statute, whether pre- or post-amendment [of the 

statute], the definition of a ‘year’ meant a service year governing the payout 

at issue.” Id. at *2.

Based upon our prior opinion, we also reverse the final judgment for 

ISO in this case and remand for entry of judgment for United.

Reversed.
2

WARNER, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5186 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on magnesium zinc aluminum 

hydroxide carbonate hydrate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mrs. MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on magnesium 

zinc aluminum hydroxide carbonate hydrate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MAGNESIUM ZINC ALUMINUM HYDROXIDE CAR4 BONATE HYDRATE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.24.13 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 magnesium zinc aluminum hydroxide carbonate hydrate) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/ 

9 31/2011’’. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5186 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Bradley T. Miller, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. The accompanying amended annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viisage Technology, Inc.



Date: May 5, 2006/s/    BRADLEY T.
MILLERBradley T. Miller Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this report.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

.

R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

February 19, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-10143

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. JOHN ERNEST BOUNDY,

Plaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellee,

versus

BERNARD JOSEPH DOLENZ; DOLENZ CLINIC,

Defendant-Counter Claimants-Appellants.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:96-CV-301-G

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Bernard Dolenz, federal prisoner # 31480-077, appeals

f ollowing the district court’s grant of John Boundy’s mot ion to

dismiss without prejudice his qui tamsuit filed on behalf of the

United States. Boundy’s motion to file a response to Dolenz’s

reply brief is DENIED.

Dolenz argues that Boundy filed his motion to voluntarily

dismiss his complaint because he had received an adverse ruling onNo. 03-10143

-2-

his motion for a summary judgment in his favor and was attempting

to avoid an unfavorable result in the proceedings. Dolenz contends

that Boundy would have not succeeded in his qui tam action because

he was not an original source under the False Claim Act and did not

have standing to bring the action. See 31 U.S.C. § 3730(3)(4).

We review a F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 41(a)(2) dismissal without prejudice

for abuse of discretion. A motion for voluntary dismissal should

be granted “unless the nonmoving party will suffer some plain legal

prejudice other than the mere prospect of a second la wsuit.”

Elbaor v. Tripath Imaging Inc.

, 279 F.3d 314, 317 (5th Cir. 2002).

Dolenz has not shown that he will suffer plain legal prejudice from

the dismissal without prejudice. S ee id. at 317-19; Manshack v.

Southwestern Elec. Power Co.

, 915 F.2d 172, 174 (5th Cir. 1990).

His arguments in his appellate brief challenging Boundy’s standing

as an original source are without merit. S ee U.S. ex rel. Laird v.

Lockheed Martin Engineering and Science Services Co.

, 336 F.3d 346,

352-55 (5th Cir. 2003). We do not consider arguments raised for

the first time in a reply brief. P eavy v. WFAA-TV, Inc.

, 221 F.3d

158, 179 (5th Cir. 2000). Also, Dolenz may re-urge his challenge

to Boundy’s standing as an original source if Boundy refiles his

qui tam action. We do not address his other issues on appeal given

the current status of the case.

AFFIRMED.
# L_2016329DE.01011901.xml

| 3.12.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 329/119 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 329/119

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2016/1821 der Kommission vom 6. Oktober 2016 zur Änderung des Anhangs I der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2658/87 des Rates über die zolltarifliche und statistische Nomenklatur sowie den Gemeinsamen Zolltarif

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 294 vom 28. Oktober 2016
  )

Seite 587, Anmerkung 9 b) Ziffer 4:

Anstatt:

„Multikomponente Integrierte Schaltungen (MCOs): eine Kombination aus einem oder mehreren monolithischen, hybriden oder integrierten Multichip-Schaltungen mit mindestens einer der folgenden Komponenten: Silizium-basierende Sensoren, Aktuatoren, Oszillatoren, Resonatoren oder Kombinationen davon, oder Komponenten, die die Funktionen von Waren der Positionen 8532, 8533, 8541 ausführen, oder Induktoren der Position 8504, auf praktisch untrennbare Weise zu einer einzigen integrierten Schaltung verbunden, als Bestandteil von der Montage auf einer Leiterplatte (PCB) oder einem anderen Träger, durch Verbindung mittels Stiften (pins), Leitungen (leads), Lötbuckeln (balls), (lands), (bumps) oder Anschlussflächen (pads) verwendeten Art.“

muss es heißen:

„Multikomponente Integrierte Schaltungen (MCOs): eine Kombination aus einem oder mehreren monolithischen, hybriden oder integrierten Multichip-Schaltungen mit mindestens einer der folgenden Komponenten: Silizium-basierende Sensoren, Aktuatoren, Oszillatoren, Resonatoren oder Kombinationen davon, oder Komponenten, die die Funktionen von Waren der Positionen 8532, 8533, 8541 ausführen, oder Induktoren der Position 8504, auf praktisch untrennbare Weise zu einer einzigen integrierten Schaltung verbunden, als Bestandteil von der für die Montage auf einer Leiterplatte (PCB) oder einem anderen Träger, durch Verbindung mittels Stiften (pins), Leitungen (leads), Lötbuckeln (balls), (lands), (bumps) oder Anschlussflächen (pads) verwendeten Art.“

---
WAGONER v. NORTH CAROLINA BD. OF EXAMINERS FOR ENGINEERS AND SURVEYORS

No. COA03-1489

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed August 16, 2005

Certification Date September 6, 2005

Appeal from Surry (01CVS1366).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
46 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

INDIANA 

#28 #36 0.9% $802 #25 #26 #29

$5.4 B SPENT IN 1.4% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $4.0 B CONTRACT 30,859 NUMBER OF $1.4 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 6%

Service: 26%

Supplies and

Equipment: 67%

By Service 

Army

29%

Navy/Marines

37%

Air Force

20%

Other Defense

15%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 3%

Reserve: 17%

Civilian: 39%

National 

Guard: 40%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

52%

Navy/Marines

19%

Air Force

14%

Other Defense

15%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Rolls-Royce $955.2 M

Raytheon $414.7 M

MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. $272.1 M

ERAPSCO $261.4 M

Allison Transmission $222.6 M

AmeriQual Group $177.0 M

SAIC $150.1 M

AM General $126.9 M

Cummins $93.3 M

Honeywell $92.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$4.0 $4.0

$3.4

FY13 FY14 FY15 FY17

$3.1 $3.0 $2.7 $2.5

$2.0

FY16 FY18 FY19 FY20

$1.4 BILLION 30,859

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Marion 308 5,438 2,270

Martin 59 5,034 0

Miami 13 541 30

Johnson 329 261 1,332

Allen 41 266 1,392

Vigo 16 132 1,052

St. Joseph 77 55 258

Lake ND 70 453

Tippecanoe 76 30 405

Vanderburgh 45 33 357

Reserve Total

1,524 9,540

0 5,093

1,719 2,303

282 2,204

337 2,036

169 1,369

346 736

156 ND

119 630

154 589
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Marion

St. Joseph

Martin

Allen

Whitley

Vanderburgh

Bartholomew

Jasper

Daviess

Elkhart

(M = millions)

$1.6 B 

$545.6 M 

$429.5 M 

$329.4 M 

$274.9 M 

$178.9 M 

$93.6 M 

$85.5 M 

$55.4 M 

$48.2 M 

Marion

Martin

Johnson

Miami

Allen

Vigo

Lake

Tippecanoe

St. Joseph

Shelby

$547.2 M 

$435.6 M 

$87.1 M 

$71.3 M 

$57.6 M 

$43.4 M 

$23.6 M 

$22.0 M 

$18.8 M 

$16.4 M 

Whitley

Jasper Allen

St. Joseph Elkhart

Marion

Bartholomew

Martin Daviess

Vanderburgh

St. Joseph

Allen

Marion

Martin

Shelby

Johnson

Vigo

Lake

Tippecanoe

Miami

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

47

INDIANA
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5199 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Stainless steel Vacuum Feed-Through 

for optical sensor, 41 millimeter diameter, MANSKE part number 43935/ 

2. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Stainless steel Vacuum 

Feed-Through for optical sensor, 41 millimeter diameter, 

MANSKE part number 43935/2. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STAINLESS STEEL VACUUM FEED-THROUGH 

4 FOR OPTICAL SENSOR, 41 MILLIMETER DI5 AMETER, MANSKE PART NUMBER 43935/2. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

HR 5199 IH 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Stainless steel Vacuum FeedThrough for optical sensor, 

41 millimeter diameter, 

MANSKE part number 

43935/2 (provided for in subheading 8536.90.80) ............. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Lori D. LOFTIS, as Guardian ad Litem for Nicholas Rothenberg, a minor, and Joseph and Alina Rothenberg, parents of Nicholas Rothenberg v. LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL, INC., and Mountaineer Little League.

No. 181P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

D. Rodney Kight, Jr., for Lori D. Loftis, et al.

*539Allan R. Tarleton, Asheville, for Little League Baseball, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th day of April 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
##### 



AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO
PATENT AND TECHNOLOGY LICENSE AGREEMENT
DATED JULY 31, 1994
 13th NOVEMBER
 RECITALS
 A.
    
    BOARD is the owner of several new inventions (collectively, these new inventions are
referred to as Technologies Numbered 37-42).B.
    
    LICENSEE is interested in developing and commercializing new technologies directed to
the treatment of cancer, and other threatening diseases, to which end LICENSEE, MDA
and BOARD entered into the AGREEMENT noted hereinabove.C.
    
    LICENSEE wishes to add Technologies Numbered 37-42 under PATENT RIGHTS as
defined in Section 2.3 of the AGREEMENT.D.
    
    And, BOARD wishes to grant LICENSEE rights to Technologies Numbered 37-42 to
promote its practical development for the benefit of the MDAs patients and for the
benefit of the people of the state of Texas.
  1.
    
    Revised Attachment A to the AGREEMENT is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the Attachment A for AMENDMENT NO. 5 (attached hereto).2.
    
    The definitions set forth in the AGREEMENT shall apply in this AMENDMENT NO. 5, except to
the extent that a definition herein is specific to this AMENDMENT NO. 5.3.
    
    The terms and provisions of the AGREEMENT shall remain in full force and effect, provided,
however, that in the event of a conflict in the terms and conditions between this AMENDMENT
NO. 4 and the AGREEMENT, AMENDMENT NO. 4 shall prevail.4.
    
    Together, this AMENDMENT NO. 5 and the AGREEMENT constitute the entire agreement between the
parties in connection with the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior and
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, negotiations and discussions, whether oral or
written, of the parties.
 /s/ NW




---



##### 



THE BOARD OF REGENTS FOR THE 
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM
    
    INTROGEN THERAPEUTICS, INC.By:
    /s/ John Mendelsohn
    
    By:
    /s/ J. David Encos, Jr.John Mendelsohn, M.D.
    
    
    J. DAVID ENCOS, JR.President
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
    
    
    SR. VICE PRESIDENTDate:
    12/13/06
    
    Date:
    11/14/06 THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS 
M. D. ANDERSON CANCER CENTER
    
    Reviewed and Approved by UTMDACC Legal Services for 
UTMDACC Signature:By:
    /s/ Leon Leach
    
    /s/ D. FountainLeon Leach
    
    11/19/06Executive Vice President
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterDate:
    11/27/06 APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:By:
    /s/ Christopher C. CapelliChristopher C. Capelli, M.D.Vice President, Technology TransferDate:
    11/14/06Approved 
as to form/s/ NWNW/LS




---



##### 



Certain information on this attachment has been omitted and filed separately with the
Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
DOT v. STAGECOACH VILLAGE.

No. 529PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 25, 2005.

W. Richard Moore, Special Deputy Attorney General, Hilda Burnett-Baker, Assistant Attorney General, for Dept. of Transportation.

Bruce P. Ashley, Greensboro, for Stagecoach Village.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of May 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Stagecoach Village) shall have up to and including the 6th day of July 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 25th day of May 2005."
Introduction"This workbook contains data from Defense Spending by State Fiscal Year 2020, a publication of the U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation (OLDCC)."The data can be broadly categorized as follows:"1. Defense contract spending,""2. Defense personnel numbers (i.e., counts of defense personnel),""3. Defense personnel spending, and""4. Total defense spending (i.e., contract and personnel spending combined)."Acknowledgements"The OLDCC partnered with the Library of Congress’s Federal Research Division (FRD) to produce this report. FRD’s analytical team includes Vega Bharadwaj, Katarina David, Zack Ham, Sema Hasan, Sarah McNeal, Annie Rorem, Alan Stone, and Liz White. Liz Chimienti managed this project for OLDCC and provided input throughout the report’s development.""This research benefited from the guidance of staff at the DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center, the U.S. Department of the Treasury, and the Congressional Research Service. Experts at the American Enterprise Institute, Brookings Institution, Center for a New American Security, and Center for Strategic and International Studies generously offered feedback on earlier versions of this report."Please direct any questions or suggestions for future reports via email to:Tara Butler"Program Director, Intergovernmental Affairs""Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, U.S. Department of Defense"tara.a.butler4.civ@mail.mil"Electronic copies of this spreadsheet and the associated PDF report are located online at https://oea.gov/dsbs-fy2020. For information on how the figures were produced, please consult the PDF report’s “Methodology” section."
Exhibit 32.1



Certification of

Chief Executive Officer

of HealthTronics, Inc.



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the
Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004 of HealthTronics, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the Issuer).



I, Brad A. Hummel, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 11, 2005



/s/ Brad A. HummelBrad A. HummelPresident and Chief Executive OfficerHealthTronics, Inc.




The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Issuer and will be retained by the Issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Riviera Tool Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kenneth K.
Rieth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter Canepa, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

Dated: November 29, 2006


By: /s/ Kenneth K. Rieth
    ------------------------------------
    Kenneth K. Rieth
    Chief Executive Officer

Dated: November 29, 2006


By: /s/ Peter Canepa
    ------------------------------------
    Peter Canepa
    Chief Financial Officer


                                       73