alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morris Publishing Group, LLC and Morris Publishing Finance Co. (the Registrants) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), William S. Morris IV, Chief Executive Officer, and Steve K. Stone, Chief Financial Officer of the both Registrants,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrants.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |     |  |                                             
|------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|June 25, 2004 |  | BY: |  | /s/ WILLIAM S. MORRIS IV                    
|              |  |     |  | William S. Morris IV Chief Executive
Officer
|              |  |    
|              |  | BY: |  | /s/ STEVE K. STONE                          
|              |  |     |  | Steve K. Stone Chief Financial
Officer      



17
Figure 73. Changes in benthic foraminiferan species with stratigraphic depth in Pb-210 dated

sediment cores from stations in the Mississippi River Bight. A line connecting 3-yr averagesis superimposed on the data for C10. (Modified from Rabalais et al. 1996, Sen Gupta et al.1996.)
# L_2016217EN.01008101.xml

| 12.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 217/81 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 217/81

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/466 of 31 March 2016 implementing Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 85 of 1 April 2016
  )

On pages 4 and 5, the Annex (concerning Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44), the numbers ‘16.’, ‘17.’ and ‘18.’ in front of the listed persons are replaced by the numbers ‘21.’, ‘22.’ and ‘23.’.

---
Joy A. STACK, as Administratrix of The Estate of Stacy B. Stack v. UNION REGIONAL MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., and Carolinas Healthcare Foundation, Inc. d/b/a Union Regional Medical Center.

No. 477P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Karen Zaman, Charlotte, for Joy A. Stack.

Harvey L. Cosper, Jr., John E. Grupp, Charlotte, for Union Regional Med. Ctr.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 29th day of August 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review (Petition for Writ of Certiorari) of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."

*878Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 7th day of September 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
STATE of North Carolina v. Andre Michael SPATES.

No. 499P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 19, 2004.

Michael D. Maultsby, Assistant District Attorney, William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of September 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Onslow County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of October 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 4th day of October 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Onslow County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 19th day of October 2004."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1997
<CASH>                                       3,733,390
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  162,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    930,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,826,146
<PP&E>                                      63,434,855
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,373,710
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,431,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,711,786
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       279,162
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,015,558
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,431,544
<SALES>                                     92,541,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            92,795,056
<CGS>                                       78,438,573
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               90,746,860
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               228,250
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,552,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                267,450
<INCOME-TAX>                                   175,705
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             91,745
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    91,745
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
In the Matter of D.M.H., Jr., A Minor Child. Appealed by Burke County Department of Social Services and Mary R. McKay, Attorney-Advocate for minor child.

No. 228P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Stephen M. Schoeberle, for Burke Co. DSS.

*231Mary R. McKay, Morganton, for D.H., minor child.

Susan J. Hall, Fayetteville, for Donald Milton Hopkins, Sr.

Rebekah W. Davis, for Michelle Stancil Riddle.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of May 2004 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Topics
3. Navigation

Navigation Explore our curated list of nautically-themed stories, ranging from nautical charts, to tides and currents, to maritime heritage.


Resources for Recreational Boaters
 Hydrographic Surveying
  Maritime Commerce in a Changing Climate
  Maritime Heritage
  Marine Navigation
 Tides and Currents
   Common Phrases with a Nautical Origin
 NOAA Celebrates 30 Years of PORTS®
  Precision Navigation


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
STATE v. LEMASTER

No. COA04-1363

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Wayne (03CRS57329A).

Case without published opinion. No error.
JONESBORO UNITED METHODIST CHURCH, an unincorporated association v. MULLINS-SHERMAN ARCHITECTS, L.L.P. and J.H. Batten, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation.

No. 170PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Eric H. Biesecker, Greensboro, for J.H. Batten, Inc.

Perry R. Safran, Raleigh, Brian J. Schoolman, for Jonesboro United Methodist Church.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of March 2004 by Defendant (J.H. Batten, Inc.) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."

Defendant shall forthwith submit an appeal bond to this Court, as provided by Appellate Rule 17(b). The bond may be in cash or by a written undertaking with good and sufficient surety in the sum of $250.00.

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 130 (Friday, July 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 40838]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14555]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-024]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed June 27, 2022 10 a.m. EST Through July 1, 2022
10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20220091, Draft Supplement, NRC, WI, Environmental Impact 
Statement Related to the Operating License for the SHINE Medical 
Isotope Production Facility, Supplement 1, Comment Period Ends: 08/22/
2022, Contact: Lance Rakovan 301-415-2589.
EIS No. 20220092, Second Draft Supplemental, DOE, AR, Long Term 
Management and Storage of Elemental Mercury, Comment Period Ends: 08/
22/2022, Contact: Julia Donkin 202-586-5000.
EIS No. 20220093, Draft, FERC, ID, GTN XPress Project, Comment Period 
Ends: 08/22/2022, Contact: Office of External Affairs 866-208-3372.
EIS No. 20220094, Draft, BLM, NV, Goldrush Mine Project, Comment Period 
Ends: 08/22/2022, Contact: Scott Distel 775-635-4093.
EIS No. 20220095, Final, USFS, NM, Carson National Forest Revision of 
Land and Resource Management Plan, Review Period Ends: 08/08/2022, 
Contact: Peter Rich 575-758-6277.

    Dated: July 1, 2022.
Marthea Rountree,
Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2022-14555 Filed 7-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mountain Valley Bancshares, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principals;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Marc J. GreeneMarc J. GreenePresident and CEO 20
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23
                        Consent of Independent Auditors





The Board of Directors
Primex Technologies, Inc.:


Re:        Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-18043)
           Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-18297)
           Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-18299)


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements 
referenced above of Primex Technologies, Inc. of our report dated February 13, 
1997 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Primex Technologies, Inc. 
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated 
statements of operations and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year 
period ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 
annual report on Form 10-K of Primex Technologies, Inc.





                                       KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP




Tampa, Florida
March 19, 1997
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TONY CARL GETCH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2023-1721

May 3, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Frederick P. 

Mercurio, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Clark E. Green, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Tony Carl Getch, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, KHOUZAM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.

__________________________
2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
FAISON v. AMERICAN NAT. CAN CO.

No. COA04-1297

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #628691).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed in part, Remanded in Part.
JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES L.L.C., et al., Petitioners v. Rebekah GEE, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals

No. 18-1323

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
FOY v. INTERSTATE BRANDS/MERITA.

No. COA04-1451.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1460 

To direct the Chief of the Army Corps of Engineers to revise certain authorized purposes described in the Missouri River Mainstem Reservoir System 

Master Water Control Manual. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 10, 2013 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri (for himself, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, 

and Mr. LONG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Chief of the Army Corps of Engineers to 

revise certain authorized purposes described in the Missouri River Mainstem Reservoir System Master Water 

Control Manual. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MASTER WATER CONTROL MANUAL REVISION. 

4 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

5 of this Act, the Secretary of the Army, acting through the 

6 Chief of the Army Corps of Engineers, shall revise the 

7 Missouri River Mainstem Reservoir System Master Water 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1460 IH

1 Control Manual and any related regulations to delete fish 

2 and wildlife as an authorized purpose of the Corps. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, David A. Chaput, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Moly, Inc. for thequarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of General Moly, Inc.

 

Dated: May 6, 2010

 
|   | By:    | /s/ David A. Chaput     |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | David A. Chaput         |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
GEORGY v. ABDEL-MALAK.

No. 574P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Edgar R. Bain, Lillington, for Georgy.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 7th day of March 2005 by Defendant for Reconsideration:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2005."
110 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

WASHINGTON

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

By Type

Service: 19%

Construction: 5%

Research and 

Development: 3%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 73%

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions B=billions)

Boeing $5.1 B

BB Construction Management $186.2 M

Pacific Medical Centers $149.1 M

Pauley Rodine $129.1 M

CHG Building Systems $102.9 M

Emerald Fire $93.9 M

Ascendant LLC $90.5 M

Diamond B Constructors $71.9 M

BP $59.7 M

Hayward Baker $57.2 M

$5.8

$4.7 $4.9

$6.8 $6.4 $6.7

$7.2 10% $6.9

55%

27%

8%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$5.1 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

111,747

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

Military

Pierce 55,125 40,065 8,580

Kitsap 28,077 7,780 19,496

Island 8,843 7,291 945

Spokane 6,674 3,493 1,143

King 3,202 629 1,165

Snohomish 3,146 929 617

Walla Walla 1,962 35 1,863

Yakima 1,169 162 273

Clark 882 50 69

Thurston 670 95 91

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 14%

Active Duty: 55%

Civilian: 31%

52%

36%

11%

1%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 111

Whatcom

King

Island 

Pierce

Klickitat 

Spokane

Snohomish

King

Island 

Pierce

Thurston

Kitsap

Yakima

Spokane

Walla Walla

Franklin

Pierce County

$2.4 B

Kitsap County

$1.7 B

Island County 

$364.9 M

Spokane County

$222.5 M

King County

$126.1 M

Snohomish County

$89.5 M

Walla Walla County

$46.7 M

Yakima County

$26.4 M

Thurston County

$17.2 M

Franklin County

$12.4 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions (M=millions)

King County

$5.1 B

Kitsap County

$657.7 M

Pierce County

$568.5 M

Klickitat County

$198.0 M

Island County

$145.4 M

Snohomish County

$126.8 M

Spokane County

$114.7 M

Whatcom County

$79.8 M

Clark County

$36.2 M

Skagit County

$35.3 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions)

#8

$12.3 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#15

2.6% OF STATE GDP

3.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$1,686

PER RESIDENT

#12

$7.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#8

111,747 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#8

$5.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 WASHINGTON

Clark 

Snohomish

Skagit

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active

Kitsap