alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
William DEAN v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE.

No. 144P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

William Dean, Pro Se.

S. Mujeed Shah-Khan, Charlotte, for City of Charlotte.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 14th day of March 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 14th day of March 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals; the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th day of March 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
# C_2017157EN.01002201.xml

| 19.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/22

---

Corrigendum to the Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the financial year 2017

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 84 of 17 March 2017
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 84 of 17 March 2017

(2017/C 157/14)

On page 17, in the row Chapter 5 4 ‘Miscellaneous revenue available for reuse but not used’, column ‘Financial year 2016’:

for:

for:

‘9 137’,

read:

read:

‘9 136’.

---
STATE OF DELAWARE

CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
OF
NATIONSRENT DEALER GROUP, LLC

This
Certificate of Formation of NationsRent Dealer Group, LLC (the "Company") is
being executed by the undersigned for the purpose of forming a limited liability
company pursuant to the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act.

1.
The name of the limited liability company is NationsRent Dealer Group,
LLC.

2.
The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is Corporation
Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, New Castle County, Delaware 19801.
The name of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation Trust
Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned authorized person of the Company has executed
this Certificate of Formation on January 6, 2005.

| | /s/ Joseph H. Izhakoff
Joseph H. Izhakoff, Authorized Person
| | ------------------------------------------------------------
Eda Hofstead CABANISS, James and Kalen Haun, and Elizabeth Wanders, Trustee, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of the D.B. Alex. Brown Exchange Fund I, L.P. v. DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES, INC. d/b/a Deutsche Bank Alex. Brown, Alex. Brown Management Services, Inc., DC Investment Partners, LLC, and D.B. Alex. Brown Exchange Fund, I, L.P.

No. 369P05-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Daniel R. Taylor, Jr., David C. Smith, Adam H. Charnes, Tonya R. Deem, Winston-Salem, for Eda Cabaniss, et al.

*177William K. Davis, Alan M. Ruley, Michael D. Phillips, for Deutsche Bank Securities, et al.

Mack Sperling, Greensboro, Paul A. Alexis, Nashville, TN, for DC Investment Partners, LLC.

J. Donald Cowan, Jr., Greensboro, William J.F. Roll, III, Kevin T. Rover, Marilyn B. Ampolsk, New York, NY, for D.B. Alex. Brown Exchange Fund.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 7th day of September 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
# Official Journal C 309E/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2013.309.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 309E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5624 October 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2013.309.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 309E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5624 October 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2013/C 309E/01 | Position (EU) No 8/2013 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council providing macro-financial assistance to the Kyrgyz RepublicAdopted by the Council on 23 September 2013 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2013/C 309E/01

Position (EU) No 8/2013 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Decision of the European Parliament and of the Council providing macro-financial assistance to the Kyrgyz RepublicAdopted by the Council on 23 September 2013

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Bryant Keith WILLIAMS, Petitioner v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

No. 19-5302

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
CAROLINA PRIDE CARWASH, INC. v. KENDRICK

No. COA04-451.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from Person (02CVS12).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published except under the limited circumstances set forth

in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

No. 97-20673

Summary Calendar

_______________

KOFI AMUA-SEKYI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

BURTON RAIFORD,

Commissioner of Texas Department of Human Services,

and

MAMIE EWING,

Regional Administrator of Region 6 of

Texas Department of Human Services,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-95-CV-1567)

_________________________

January 29, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The plaintiff, Kofi Amua-Sekyi, sued officials of the

defendant state agency, the Texas Department of Human Services,
2

under title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act,

claiming he was unlawfully denied employment after having applied

several times. The matter was submitted by consent to a magistrate

judge, who granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants.

On appeal, Amua-Sekyi pursues only his age discrimination

claim. We affirm, essentially for the reasons given by the

magistrate in her comprehensive and convincing twenty-three-page

Memorandum and Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary

Judgment entered on July 16, 1997.

AFFIRMED.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5157 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to repeal the provisions prohibiting persons convicted of drug offenses from receiving student financial 

assistance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. FILNER, Ms. 

CLARKE, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. GUTIERREZ, Mr. TIERNEY, Ms. NORTON, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. 

CUMMINGS, Mr. FARR, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. 

THOMPSON of Mississippi, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. 

BUTTERFIELD, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. 

HINCHEY, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. KUCINICH, Ms. LEE, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. 

RANGEL, Mr. COHEN, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. OLVER, Mr. ACKERMAN, 

Mr. HARE, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. 

TOWNS, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. 

HONDA, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. WYNN, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. 

LANTOS, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. STARK, Mr. 

AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. PAUL, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. WATT, Mr. CLAY, 

Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. HIRONO, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. MATHESON, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. 

NADLER, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mrs. CAPPS, 

Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. RUSH, and Mr. LEWIS of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to repeal 

the provisions prohibiting persons convicted of drug offenses from receiving student financial assistance. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5157 IH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Removing Impedi5 ments to Students Education Act’’ or the ‘‘RISE Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PROVISIONS PROHIBITING PERSONS 

7 CONVICTED OF DRUG OFFENSES FROM RE8 CEIVING STUDENT FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE. 

9 Subsection (r) of section 484 of the Higher Edu10 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091(r)) is repealed. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
ALABAMA-COUSHATTA TRIBE OF TEXAS, Petitioner v. TEXAS

No. 19-403

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Serrano, Also Known as Antonio Ramirez, Appellant.

[800 NYS2d 647]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from so much of a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J., at plea; Ferdinand, J., at sentence), imposed April 21, 2004, as, upon sentencing him to concurrent determinate terms of five years’ imprisonment upon his conviction of robbery in the first degree, and one-year imprisonment upon his conviction of attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, further required him to serve a period of post-release supervision of 3/2 years.

Ordered that the sentence is modified, on the law, by reducing the period of post-release supervision from 3/2 to 3 years; as so modified, the sentence is affirmed insofar as appealed from.

*971In full satisfaction of the indictment in his case, the defendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree and attempted grand larceny in the fourth degree. The Supreme Court promised that in the event the defendant successfully completed a drug treatment program, it would allow him to withdraw his plea to the robbery count, and would sentence him to a conditional discharge on the remaining count. The Supreme Court further advised the defendant that in the event he did not successfully complete the drug treatment program, he would receive concurrent sentences of five years on the top count, and one year on the other count. The court also advised the defendant that in the latter event, he would receive a three-year period of post-release supervision.

The defendant did not successfully complete the drug treatment program. At sentencing, the Supreme Court imposed the five-year and one-year terms of imprisonment, as promised. However, rather than impose the promised three-year period of post-release supervision, the court imposed a period of SVa years. The People concede that a “ministerial error” was made, and do not oppose a reduction in the defendant’s period of post-release supervision, to the period the court promised at the time the defendant entered his plea.

A plea of guilty “induced by an unfulfilled promise either must be vacated or the promise honored” *(People v Selikoff,*35 NY2d 227, 241 [1974], *cert denied*419 US 1122 [1975]). In light of that principle, and the People’s position, we modify the period of post-release supervision the defendant must complete, to three years.

The defendant’s additional contention that the circumstances of this case justify a further reduction in the period of post-release supervision, to 2V2 years *(see*Penal Law § 70.45 [2]), is without merit. Prudenti, P.J., H. Miller, Crane, Ritter and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of International Food Products
Group, Inc. (the “Company”),
for the year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Richard Damion, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify, to my knowledge
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 15 U.S.C. 78m (a) or 780(d)); and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
Richard Damion


__________________________________________


Richard
Damion


Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer





Dated:  December
19, 2008





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
International Food Products Group, Inc. and will be retained by International
Food Products Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. Chester Wilson JONES, Jr.

No. 399P04-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas H. Lock, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of September 2005 by Defendant to proceed in forma pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of October 2005."
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 126 (Friday, July 1, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 39337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14237]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

29 CFR Part 21


Protection of Human Subjects

CFR Correction

    This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register 
to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most 
recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.

0
In Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 0 to 99, revised 
as of July 1, 2021, in Sec.  21.101, remove the heading from paragraph 
(l) and add a heading to paragraph (l)(1) to read as follows:


Sec.  21.101  To what does this policy apply?

* * * * *
    (l) * * *
    (1) Pre-2018 Requirements. * * *
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-14237 Filed 6-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099-10-P
Donald Eugene MISENHEIMER v. James Clayton BURRIS and Randall Burris.

No. 245A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 7, 2005.

Daniel S. Bullard, Gibsonville, for Donald Eugene Misenheimer.

William C. Tucker, Albemarle, for James Clayton Burris.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (James Clayton Burris) on the 21st day of June 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Allowed. Defendant is allowed thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file his brief, and plaintiff is given thirty (30) days from receipt of the defendant's brief to file his brief. By order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Frank J. Mercardante, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
of Southwest Community Bancorp; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors
and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: May 12, 2005 /s/ Frank J. MercardanteFrank J. MercardanteChief Executive Officer
BLANQUEAMIENTO DEL CORAL

¿Te has preguntado cómo se blanquea un coral?

CORAL SALUDABLE

El coral y el alga dependen 

uno del otro para sobrevivir

Los corales tienen una relación simbiótica con el alga microscópica zooxantela que vive en sus tejidos. Estas 

algas le proveen al coral su principal 

fuente de alimento y le dan color. 

¿QUÉ CAUSA EL

BLANQUEAMIENTO DEL 

CORAL?

CORAL ESTRESADO

Si está estresada, el alga 

abandona el coral

CORAL BLANQUEADO

El coral queda blanqueado y 

vulnerable al perder el alga

Los aumentos en la temperatura del 

agua afectan la relación simbiótica 

entre el coral y el alga, haciendo que 

el alga abandone el coral. 

Sin el alga, el coral pierde su principal fuente de alimento, se torna 

pálido o blanco y es más susceptible a enfermedades. 

Aumento en la 

temperatura del océano 

Aumentos en la temperatura 

del océano provocados por el 

cambio climático son la causa 

principal del blanqueamiento 

de corales. 

cercanos a la costa. 

Las escorrentías luego de 

eventos de lluvias fuertes 

pueden traer consigo 

contaminantes que pueden 

blanquear los corales 

Escorrentías y 

contaminación 

Sobre exposición a la 

luz solar 

Cuando las temperaturas son 

altas, la irradiación del sol 

contribuye al blanqueamiento 

de los corales en áreas 

llanas. 

Mareas bajas extremas

La exposición de los corales al 

aire durante mareas bajas 

extremas, puede causar el 

blanqueamiento de corales 

que se encuentren en aguas 

llanas. 

Arte y contenido por NOAA. Traducción del 

inglés al español por el DRNA de Puerto Rico.
STATE v. McRAE

No. COA04-1290.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from Durham (03CRS50926).

Case reported without published opinion. No error in trial; affirmed with respect to prior record level determination; remanded for resentencing.
STATE v. WRIGHT

No. COA05-327.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed November 15, 2005.

Certification Date December 5, 2005

Appeal from the Forsyth (03CRS52528).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 10(w)


                      [SUPERIOR TELECOM INC. LETTERHEAD]


                                                               As of May 1, 1998


The Alpine Group, Inc.
1790 Broadway, Suite 1500
New York, NY 10019-1412


Re: Services Agreement dated as of October 2, 1996 by and between
    The Alpine Group, Inc. and Superior Telecom Inc., as amended by
    letter agreement dated as of May 1, 1997 (as so amended the "Agreement")


Gentlemen:

    This will memorialize our agreement to extend the captioned Agreement for 
a term commencing as of the date hereof and expiring April 30, 1999, it being 
understood that in consideration for your rendering the services provided for 
under the Agreement, the undersigned shall continue to pay to you the annual 
$2,717,000 service fee and other reimbursable amounts as payable thereunder 
in the manner provided for under the Agreement.

    The terms of this extension have been approved by the Audit Committee of 
the Board of Directors of Superior Telecom Inc.

    As modified hereby the Agreement is hereby expressly ratified and 
confirmed.

    If the foregoing conforms with your understanding of the agreement reached 
between us, kindly execute a copy of this letter so indicating.


                                       Very truly yours,

Agreed to as of the date first
hereinabove set forth                  SUPERIOR TELECOM INC.
THE ALPINE GROUP, INC.


By:      /s/ Bragi F. Schut            By:       /s/ Steven S. Elbaum
   -------------------------------        ----------------------------------
   Bragi F. Schut                         Steven S. Elbaum

Its: Executive Vice President          Its: President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Form****10-Q) of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (the “Company”), I, Ronald E. Baron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,****hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (a) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form l0-Q. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | /s/ Ronald E. Baron | Date: August 14, 2009 |
|--------|---------------------|-----------------------|

|   | Ronald E. Baron |
|--------|-----------------|

|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|