alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016243EN.01001301.xml

| 10.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 243/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 243/13

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION (CFSP) 2016/1636

of 6 September 2016

on the acceptance of third States' contributions to the European Union CSDP Military Training Mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA) (EUTM RCA/1/2016)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/610of 19 April 2016 on a European Union CSDP Military Training Mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA) (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/610, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 8(2) of Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/610, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee (PSC) to take the relevant decisions on acceptance of the proposed contributions by third States.

| (2) | Following recommendation on a contribution from Georgia by the EU Mission Commander and the advice from the European Union Military Committee, the contribution from Georgia should be accepted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following recommendation on a contribution from Georgia by the EU Mission Commander and the advice from the European Union Military Committee, the contribution from Georgia should be accepted.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Consequently, Denmark is not participating in the adoption of this Decision and is neither bound by it nor subject to its application, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 5 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark does not participate in the elaboration and implementation of decisions and actions of the Union which have defence implications. Consequently, Denmark is not participating in the adoption of this Decision and is neither bound by it nor subject to its application,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Third States' contributions

1.   The contribution from Georgia to EUTM RCA is accepted and considered to be significant.

2.   Georgia is exempted from financial contributions to the budget of EUTM RCA.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 6 September 2016.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

W. STEVENS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 104, 20.4.2016, p. 21.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         588,287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,782,763
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,782,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          405,442
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,782,763
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               968,911
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               842,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (126,410)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (126,410)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (126,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.24)


</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5164 

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical that is used for 

dyeing apparel home textiles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mr. BRADY of Texas introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on a certain chemical that 

is used for dyeing apparel home textiles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHEMICAL THAT IS USED FOR DYEING AP4 PAREL HOME TEXTILES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5164 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Bis[2-[[5-(aminosulfonyl)-2- 

hydroxyphenyl]azo]-3-oxo-Nphenylbutyramidato(2- 

)]cobaltate(1-) sodium; 3-Hydroxy-2-(2-hydroxy-5- 

sulfamoylphenylazo)isocrotonanilide cobalt(III) 

chelates sodium salt (CAS 

Nos. 72496–88–9) (provided 

for in subheading 

3204.12.45) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
DOT v. HAYWOOD COUNTY.

No. 628PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 14, 2005.

Jeffrey W. Norris, for Haywood County.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th day of September 2005 by Plaintiff Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Department of Transportation) shall have up to and including the 19th day of October 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of September 2005."
110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5220 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 3800 SW. 185th Avenue in Beaverton, Oregon, as the ‘‘Major Arthur Chin Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 5220 EH

1 SECTION 1. MAJOR ARTHUR CHIN POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 3800 SW. 185th Avenue in Bea4 verton, Oregon, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Major Arthur Chin Post Office Building’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Major Arthur Chin 

10 Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 5, 

2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5220 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Beaverton, Oregon, as the ‘‘Major Arthur Chin al Service located at 3800 SW. 185th Avenue in
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO PURSUANT TO**




**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**




**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NorthStar Realty Finance
      Corp. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), David T. Hamamoto, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
      knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
                May 10, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                David T. HamamotoDavid
                T. Hamamoto
              Chief
                Executive Officer




This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Michael C. Brant, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
Roadhouse Grill, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002),
that to my knowledge:  1.
    
    the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
annual period ended April 25, 2004 (the Report), filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date: August 6, 2004/s/  Michael C. BrantMichael C. BrantExecutive Vice President
and
Chief Financial Officer F-41
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350
                   (SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of, Comlink Communications Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
Bell, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 11, 2006

By:  /s/ James Bell
     -----------------------------------------------
     James Bell, President, Chief Executive Officer,
     Chief Financial Officer and Director














--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            MARINE EXPLORATION, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the annual report on
Form 10-KSB/A of Marine Exploration, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2007:

          (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     Marine Exploration, Inc.




/s/ Miguel Thomas Gonzalez
--------------------------
Miguel Thomas Gonzalez
Chief Executive Officer
March 13, 2008


 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Marine Exploration, Inc.
and will be retained by Marine Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marc L. Reisch, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                              
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Marc L. Reisch           
|                      |  | Marc L. Reisch               
|                      |  | President and                
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |  | (principal executive officer)
STATE V.ANDERSON.

No. COA04-1547.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Iredell (01CRS52663)

Case reported without published opinion No error.
Air Force

Army

Navy/Marines

Other Defense

13%

26%

35%

26%

$39.0 $38.5 $38.5 $34.9 $32.1 $31.3 $29.9 $30.5

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

33%

50%

13%

4%

Construcon: 2%

Research and

 Development: 9%

Service: 59%

Supplies and

 Equipment: 30%

Acve Duty: 42% Civilian: 45%

Naonal Guard/

Reserve: 13%

Northrop Grumman

Huntington Ingalls

Atlantic Diving Supply

Leidos

Booz Allen Hamilton

CACI

SAIC

General Dynamics

Lockheed Martin

Hewlett ‐Packard

$1.8 B

$1.6 B

$1.3 B

$931.3 M

$888.7 M

$733.8 M

$715.7 M

$682.0 M

$646.9 M

$505.0 M

Norfolk City

Virginia Beach City

Fairfax

Arlington

Portsmouth City

Prince William

Prince George

York

Newport News City

Accomack

County

35,061

25,657

21,605

18,511

16,567

12,953

12,896

10,221

10,168

7,594

Total*

16,510

16,552

6,381

2,731

2,803

7,566

8,926

7,783

5,526

6,734

Acve Duty

   Military

16,204

3,544

11,796

15,537

13,546

4,258

3,475

642

3,562

83

Civilian

 FISCAL YEAR 2017

VIRGINIA

   DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions B=billions)

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

   DEFENSE PERSONNEL

Allocaons, By Type

Allocaons, By Service

$15.7 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

208,701

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locaons

*Total also includes uniformed Naonal Guard and Reserve units.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

108 Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017
AF Actve Army Actve Army Guard MC Actve Navy Actve WHS

VIRGINIAVIRGINIAVIRGINIA VIRGINIA

#2 #1 11.4% $5,459 #2 #3 #1

$46.2 B

SPENT IN STATE

8.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S.

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $30.5 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

208,701 NUMBER

OF PERSONNEL

$15.7 B PERSONNEL

SPENDING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions) B=billions)(M=millions

DELAWARE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MARYLAND

WEST VIRGINIA

Fairfax County

$13.7 B

Arlington County

$2.6 B

Norfolk City

$2.2 B

Virginia Beach City

$2.1 B

Newport News City

$2.0 B

Prince William County

$1.4 B

Alexandria City

$1.1 B

Loudoun County

$1.1 B

Portsmouth City

$511.6 M

King George County

$378.0 M

Fairfax Arlington

Norfolk

Virginia Beach

Newport News

Prince William

Alexandria

Loudoun

Portsmouth

King George

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions) B=billions)(M=millions

DELAWARE

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MARYLAND

OHIO

WEST VIRGINIA

Norfolk City

$2.8 B

Fairfax County

$2.1 B

Arlington County

$2.0 B

Virginia Beach City

$1.3 B

Portsmouth City

$1.2 B

Accomack County

$970.5 M

Prince George County

$727.8 M

Newport News City

$646.4 M

York County

$589.3 M

Prince William County

$582.8 M

Norfolk

Fairfax

Arlington

Virginia Beach

Portsmouth

Accomack

Prince George

Newport News

York

Prince William

Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017 109
BRUNING & FEDERLE MFG. CO. v. MILLS

No. COA04-999

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Iredell (02CVS2239).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
J-S06001-15

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

JOSEPH L. MILLER

Appellant No. 3014 EDA 2012

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence September 21, 2012

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County 

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-51-CR-0501021-2004

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., LAZARUS, J., and FITZGERALD, J.*

DISSENTING STATEMENT BY FITZGERALD, J.: FILED FEBRUARY 18, 2015

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the trial court’s statement of 

reasons did not support its decision to revoke Appellant’s probation in light 

of the record. Instantly, the trial court emphasized that it revoked 

Appellant’s probation for his failure to save money for a required polygraph 

test. See Trial Ct. Op., 7/17/13, at 2 n.1.1 However, the record established 

 

*

Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

1 Appellant also admitted to being in the presence of minor children while 

staying at his mother’s home. However, the trial court did not revoke 

Appellant’s probation for that reason. See Trial Ct. Op. at 2 n.1. Moreover, 

the Probation Department did not seek revocation of Appellant’s probation 

after that incident, but rather afforded him “roughly five months,” from 

February 2012 to June 2012, to save money for a polygraph test, which he 

failed to do. See N.T., 7/20/12, at 6. The trial court also observed 
J-S06001-15

- 2 -

that Appellant lived at his mother’s home, his annual income was $205 per 

month, and the required test cost $305.2 Although the court suggested 

Appellant had ample time to save, but refused to do so, I believe Appellant 

established a prima facie case of indigence that should have been addressed 

before the trial court revoked his probation based on a willful failure to save 

or pay for a required test. See generally Commonwealth v. Eggers, 742 

A.2d 174, 176 (Pa. Super. 1999); see also Miller v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & 

Parole, 784 A.2d 246, 249 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001). Therefore, I would remand 

this matter for a new revocation hearing. 

 

Appellant also had some nineteen months—from his 2010 violation of 

probation to June 2012—to save for a test.

2 Based on the present record Appellant’s average daily income was $6.74. 

Although there was some indication that Appellant’s mother planned to 

assist him financially before her death in May of 2012, neither party 

developed a record regarding this possible assistance or income, or other 

financial support Appellant may have had.
STATE v. WRIGHT

No. COA05-86

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Forsyth (04CRS51647).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. CALDWELL

No. COA05-139.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed November 15, 2005.

Certification Date December 5, 2005

Appeal from the Mecklenbur (02CRS235273, 02CRS235274, 02CRS235275, 02CRS235281, 02CRS235282, 02CRS235283, 02CRS235284, 02CRS235288, 02CRS235289, 02CRS235290).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. No error.
SANDERS v. BRAD FARRAH PONTIAC GMC NISSAN

No. COA05-77.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed November 15, 2005.

Certification Date December 5, 2005

Appeal from the NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #063225).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed in part and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5256 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5256

          To suspend temporarily the duty on disperse red 60.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on disperse red 60.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPERSE RED 60.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.49 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to disperse red 60) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (a) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Joseph D. Borgerding | Date: August 13, 2010 |
|--------|--------------------------|-----------------------|
|   | Joseph D. Borgerding     |                  |
|   | Chief Executive Officer  |                  |