alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the UnitedStates Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Steven M. Van Dick, in his capacity as Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Hansen Medical, Inc., hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: (i) the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2007 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and  (ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and result of operations of Hansen Medical, Inc.May 14, 2007       /s/ Steven M. Van Dick **Vice President and Chief Financial Officer**    **(Principal Financial and**    **Accounting Officer)**       This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is notdeemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing of Hansen Medical, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theExchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4950 

To extend the duty suspension on Phenyl salicylate (benzoic 

acid, 2-hydroxy-, phenyl ester). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mr. DAVID DAVIS of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on Phenyl salicylate (benzoic 

acid, 2-hydroxy-, phenyl ester). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PHENYL SALICYLATE (BENZOIC ACID, 2-HY4 DROXY-, PHENYL ESTER). 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.65 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

7 Phenyl salicylate (benzoic acid, 2-hydroxy-, phenyl ester)) 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/ 

9 31/2011’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4950 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

3 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

4 the date that is 15 days after the date of enactment of 

5 this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5079 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5079

     To extend the suspension of duty on Trimethylopropane tris(3-
                         aziridinylpropanoate).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2008

Mr. Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the suspension of duty on Trimethylopropane tris(3-
                         aziridinylpropanoate).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRIMETHYLOPROPANE TRIS(3-AZIRIDINYLPROPANOATE).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.87 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Trimethylopropane tris(3-
aziridinylpropanoate)) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5182 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentadecanolide. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mrs. MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on cyclopentadecanolide. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CYCLOPENTADECANOLIDE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Cyclopentadecanolide (CAS 

No. 106–02–5) (provided for 

in subheading 2932.29.50) ... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5182 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCT 18, 2006

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 05-16979

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-20929-CR-SH

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

versus 

STANLEY EDOUARD, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(October 18, 2006)

Before ANDERSON, BIRCH and BARKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
2

Stanley Edouard appeals his conviction for conspiracy to defraud the United

States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Edouard alleges that he was prejudiced as a

result of the district court, sua sponte, excusing and replacing an impaneled juror

with an alternate juror on the basis of severe financial hardship to the impaneled

juror in relation to his probationary employment. Edouard alleges that the district

court improperly excused the juror because there was no “clear factual support” to

prove that the juror was unable to perform, or disqualified from performing, his

duties. Additionally, Edouard argues that an employment inconvenience is not

tantamount to an inability to serve on a jury. Edouard also argues that the district

court should have held a hearing on the juror’s incapacity since his disability was

not obvious. Finally, Edouard claims prejudice because the juror had “expressed

great concern” over the government’s recording of conversations. 

Pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 24(c), the district court “may impanel up to 6

alternate jurors to replace any jurors who are unable to perform or who are

disqualified from performing their duties.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 24(c). We review a

district court’s decision to replace an impaneled juror with an alternate juror for an

abuse of discretion. See United States v. Puche, 350 F.3d 1137, 1152 (11th Cir.

2003). We “review the exercise of this discretion to ensure that the [d]istrict [c]ourt

did not discharge the juror without factual support, or for a legally irrelevant
3

reason so as to amount to a showing of bias or prejudice to the defendant.” Id.

(internal quotations and citations omitted). A juror can be excused from jury duty

because of severe financial hardship. See Thiel v. Southern Pac. Co., 328 U.S.

217, 224, 66 S.Ct. 984, 987-88, 90 L.Ed. 1181 (1946) (stating, in the civil context,

that financial hardship is a proper reason for excusing a juror from jury duty if the

“financial embarrassment is such as to impose a real burden and hardship”). 

Moreover, “reversal is required only if there is a reasonable possibility that the

district court's violation of Rule 24(c) actually prejudiced the defendant by tainting

the jury's final verdict.” Id. at 1286-87 (citations omitted).

Upon review of the record and having considered the briefs of the parties in

light of the deferential standard of review, we cannot say that the district court

abused its discretion in excusing the juror sua sponte. 

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 12.2
**Microcell Telecommunications Inc.**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Jacques Leduc, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of MicrocellTelecommunications Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the company and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: June 30, 2004
/s/ Jacques Leduc Jacques Leduc
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scientific Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley Chan, President, CEO & CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|/s/ Stanley Chan                   | 
|---------------------------------- | 
|Stanley Chan, President, CEO & CFO | 
|                                   | 



Dated:  May 20, 2009
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) ofInfoSonics Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007,Jeffrey Klausner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: August 14, 2007 |     | /s/ Jeffrey  Klausner |
|------------------------|----------|----------------------------|
|                   |     | Jeffrey Klausner,          |
|                   | * * | *Chief Financial Officer*  |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

PHARMACOPEIA, INC.

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacopeia, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Brian M. Posner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) of the Company,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Brian M. Posner                                        |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Brian M. Posner                                            |
|   | Executive Vice President,                                  |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer                      |
|   | (Principal Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) |
|   | November 6, 2008                                      |

 

1

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-6079
In Re: CALVIN EUGENE SMITH, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:92-cr-00102-jlk-3) Submitted: April 27, 2006 Decided: May 8, 2006 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Calvin Eugene Smith, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Calvin Eugene Smith petitions for a writ of mandamus. He seeks an order vacating the monetary penalties imposed in his criminal judgment. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. See In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a su bstitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). The relief sought by Smith is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
HomePosts

# New Findings in the 'Twilight Reefs'

## New species of crustacean discovered in thriving mesophotic ecosystem.

## One Tiny Crustacean

A line drawing of the newly-discovered (and very tiny) *Cumella pagani*, found in the sediment of a mesophotic ecosystem. The creature measures around .08 inches in length. Mesophotic — 'middle light' — is the dimly-lit area of the ocean found between around 100-300 feet .  Corals found in these deeper parts of the ocean may offer hope for shallower, degraded reefs. 

Recognizing his contributions to NOAA-funded coral reef research, a University of Puerto Rico scientist will have a new species of a sediment-dwelling crustacean named in his honor. 

The new species, named the Cumella *pagani* n. sp, is a cumacean crustacean that lives on the Caribbean mesophotic coral reefs studied by Dr. Francisco E. Pagán. Cumaceans are small, benthic marine crustaceans, common in muddy and sandy sediments. 

Little is known or understood about mesophotic coral ecosystems because these areas are hard to reach.  Mesophotic corals live in a region that  is often called the "twilight zone" of the ocean, roughly 100-300 feet  deep, where light barely penetrates. 

Scientists are studying mesophotic corals as potential sources to reseed or renew shallower coral reefs as well as important habitats of many fish species. Bringing to light the existence of healthy mesophotic coral ecosystems provide insights on the devastating declines and opportunities for management and restoration of both shallow-water corals and the newly-recognized mesophotic ecosystems. 

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
          - Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 127 (Tuesday, July 5, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 39886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 11775]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``First Kings of Europe: The 
Emergence of Hierarchy in the Prehistoric Balkans'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``First Kings of Europe: The 
Emergence of Hierarchy in the Prehistoric Balkans'' at the Field Museum 
of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois; the Institute for the Study of 
the Ancient World, New York University, New York, New York, under the 
title ``Ritual and Memory: The Ancient Balkans and Beyond;'' and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of 
cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or 
display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chi D. Tran, Program Administrator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6013050314090f0e525455592013140114054e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bf8eee8ffe2e4e5b9bfbeb2cbf8ffeaffeea5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), E.O. 12047 of March 27, 1978, the 
Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, 
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 
of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 
2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Stacy E. White,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2022-14229 Filed 7-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2016336EN.01000101.xml

| 13.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 12 September 2016

adopting the Council's position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017

(2016/C 336/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314(3) thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 July 2016, the Commission submitted a proposal containing the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 July 2016, the Commission submitted a proposal containing the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017 (1).

1

| (2) | The Council examined the Commission proposal with a view to defining a position consistent, on the revenue side, with Council Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom of 7 June 2007 on the system of the European Communities' own resources (2), and, on the expenditure side, with Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 (3), |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Council examined the Commission proposal with a view to defining a position consistent, on the revenue side, with Council Decision 2007/436/EC, Euratom of 7 June 2007 on the system of the European Communities' own resources (2), and, on the expenditure side, with Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 (3),

2

3

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on the draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2017 was adopted by the Council on 12 September 2016.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 12 September 2016.

For the Council

The President

M. LAJČÁK

---

(1)  COM(2016) 300 final.

1

(2)  OJ L 163, 23.6.2007, p. 17.

2

(3)  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 884.

3

---