alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Air Force

Army

Navy/Marines

Other Defense

7%

21%

67%

5%

$9.2 $10.7 $11.2

$13.0

$9.8 $10.1

$12.5

$14.4

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

44%

40%

9%

7%

Construcon: 0%

Research and

 Development: 8%

Service: 5%

Supplies and

 Equipment: 86%

Acve Duty: 30%

Civilian: 19%

Naonal Guard/

Reserve: 51%

General Dynamics

United Technologies

Lockheed Marn

Colt Defense Holding

Leonardo S.p.A. (Finmeccanica)

Ensign‐Bickford Industries

Gartner

Sonalysts

PCX Aerostructures

Treadwell

$6.9 B

$6.4 B

$1.0 B

$25.3 M

$21.1 M

$19.1 M

$17.2 M

$16.8 M

$14.7 M

$13.9 M

New London

Harord

New Haven

Middlesex

Fairfield

Tolland

Litchfield

Windham

County

6,352

3,746

1,159

1,030

981

114

12

ND

Total*

3,787

45

66

ND

14

71

ND

ND

Acve Duty

   Military

1,455

788

55

65

230

ND

12

ND

Civilian

 FISCAL YEAR 2017

CONNECTICUT

   DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions B=billions)

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

   DEFENSE PERSONNEL

Allocaons, By Type

Allocaons, By Service

$596.4 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

13,408

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locaons

*Total also includes uniformed Naonal Guard and Reserve units.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

28 Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017
AF Guard Army Guard Navy Actve

CONNECTICUTCONNECTICUT

#7 #3 3.7% $4,170 #4 #39 #39

$15.0 B

SPENT IN STATE

5.6% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S.

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $14.4 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

13,408 NUMBER

OF PERSONNEL

$0.6 B PERSONNEL

SPENDING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions) B=billions)(M=millions

New London County

$7.0 B

Fairfeld County

$4.1 B

Hartord County

$3.6 B

New Haven County

$87.2 M

Litchfeld County

$30.1 M

Middlesex County

$12.3 M

Tolland County

$8.8 M

Windham County

$5.7 M

New London

Fairfeld

Hartord

New Haven

Litchfeld

Middlesex

Tolland Windham

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (K=thousands M=millions)

New London County

$366.9 M

Hartord County

$129.9 M

Fairfeld County

$39.8 M

New Haven County

$29.0 M

Middlesex County

$21.9 M

Tolland County

$6.8 M

Litchfeld County

$566.9 K

Windham County

$353.8 K

New London

Hartord

Fairfeld

New Haven

Middlesex

Tolland

Litchfeld

Windham

Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017 29
IN RE S.D.

No. COA04-903.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 19, 2005.

Certification Date May 9, 2005.

Appeal from Guilford (04J19).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 501 

For the relief of Valerie Plame Wilson. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. INSLEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Select 

Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) 

A BILL 

For the relief of Valerie Plame Wilson. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Valerie Plame Wilson 

5 Compensation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT FROM THE CENTRAL IN7 TELLIGENCE AGENCY. 

8 For purposes of any determination of rights under 

9 title III of the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement Act 

10 (50 U.S.C. 2001 et seq.), Valerie Plame Wilson of Wash11 ington, District of Columbia, shall be considered to have 

12 met the age and consent requirements that apply under 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HR 501 IH

1 section 302(b) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2152(b)) by virtue 

2 of section 233(a) of such Act (50 U.S.C. 2053(a)). 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Calude M. VIAR, Jr., Co-administrator of the Estate of Megan Rae Viar, Deceased, and Co-administrator of the Estate of Macey Lauren Viar, Deceased v. N.C. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.

No. 109A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

William H. Borden, Robert T. Hargett, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, Ann Reed, Senior Deputy Attorney General, for NC Department of Transportation.

Fred W. DeVore, III, Charlotte, for Viar et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiffs on the 12th day of May 2005 for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, D. Joseph Gersuk, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of ANGIODYNAMICS, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: January 8, 2010



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/    D. Joseph Gersuk                                            
|D. Joseph Gersuk, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
32 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

DELAWARE 

#44

$1.0 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#40

1.1% OF STATE GDP

0.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$947

PER RESIDENT 

#45

$0.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#45

10,303 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#43

$0.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 1% Development: 9%

Service: 20%

Supplies and

Equipment: 69%

By Service 

Army

65%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

20%

Other Defense

12%

Top Defense Contractors 

AstraZeneca PLC

SNA International

Custom Mechanical Systems Corp.

Phase Sensitive Innovations

Caesar Rodney School District

Frontier Technologies, Inc.

Transcontinental Airways Corp.

Greenwich Aerogroup, Inc.

Benaka, Inc.

W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.

(M = millions)

$287.1 M

$19.9 M

$17.0 M

$12.2 M

$10.2 M

$9.1 M

$7.5 M

$7.1 M

$6.8 M

$5.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$0.5

$0.4 $0.4

FY14

$0.3

FY15

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2

$0.1

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 23%

Active Duty: 35%

National 

Guard: 26%

Civilian: 15%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

25%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

71%

Other Defense

1%

$476.2 MILLION 10,303

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County

Kent

New Castle

Sussex

Active

Duty

3,567

44 

0 

Civilian

1,058

448 

29 

National

Guard

149 

2,063

514 

Reserve

1,759

602

58 

Total

6,533

3,157

601
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

(M = millions)

$374.5 M

$93.2 M

$5.8 M

Kent

New Castle

Sussex

$342.7 M

$118.6 M

$13.7 M

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 3

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

3

DELAWARE
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Citigroup Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II (the‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the periodending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector

Date: November 14,2006

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5243 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5243

                 For the relief of Kumi Iizuka-Barcena.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2008

  Mr. Reyes introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Kumi Iizuka-Barcena.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR KUMI IIZUKA-BARCENA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Kumi Iizuka-Barcena shall 
be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of 
status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Kumi Iizuka-Barcena enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), she 
shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Kumi Iizuka-Barcena, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. PRITCHARD.

No. COA04-453.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Beaufort (02CRS1664, 02CRS50925)

Case reported without published opinion Remanded.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ZHONGPIN INC. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Yuanmei Ma, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2007                           By: /s/ Yuanmei Ma
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Yuanmei Ma
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. JOHNSON.

No. COA04-945.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 5, 2005.

Certification Date July 25, 2005.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (00CRS40922, 00CRS40923, 01CRS162278, 01CRS162279, 01CRS162280).

Case without published opinion. No error.
- Home
- Facts
- What is a maritime forest?

# **What is a maritime forest?**

## Maritime forests **protect our shorelines** from ongoing movement of the coast.

*These stumps are evidence that trees once grew here, but due to a constantly changing shoreline, they are now mostly submerged in the ocean.*

Maritime forests are shoreline estuaries that grow along coastal barrier islands that support a great diversity of plants and animals. Many maritime forests in the United States remain largely untouched by commercial development and closely resemble the woodlands where Native Americans lived and early colonists settled hundreds of years ago. Trees, bushes, and other plants in maritime forests and estuaries withstand strong winds, periodic flooding, and salt spray. Many species of mammals and reptiles make the forests their home, and thousands of birds migrate to maritime forests each year.

*Currituck Banks Reserve, on North Carolina's Outer Banks, is a maritime forest.*

A good example of a maritime forest is the Currituck Banks Reserve, located on the Outer Banks of North Carolina.  The western, ocean side of Currituck consists of sand dunes of beach grass and sea oats, which front a tightly woven canopy of shrub-like thickets of wax myrtle, holly, and stunted oaks.  The canopy acts as a windscreen to protect the forest's less tolerant interior trees, often consisting of American holly, beach olive, ironwood, loblolly pine, red maple, and live oak. On the other side of the barrier island's maritime forest lies the estuary of Currituck Sound, where fresh water meets the ocean's salt water.  This shallow intertidal area is home to the estuary's abundant flora and fauna. 

Like  all barrier islands, maritime forests are constantly changing and on the move. On Currituck, for example, one can see stumps of deciduous trees along the sandy beach. These trees were once in the center of the island, but due to the constantly changing shoreline, they are now mostly submerged in the ocean. Maritime forests, like all estuaries, are essential for storm protection. They also conserve important nutrients and groundwater. 

##### More **Information**

 North Carolina National Estuarine Research Reserve 

 NERRS Estuary Education 

 National Estuarine Research Reserve System 

 Estuaries (Education Resources) 

##### **Last updated:**

###### 						 1/04/21					

**Author:** NOAA

How to cite this article

Contact Us

##### 					Feedback

              -  Provide Feedback 
              -  Contact Us
              -  Report an error

##### 					Social

              - 
              - 
              - 
*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
							About NOS						- About Us
- NOS Program Offices
- Media Inquiries
- Website Acknowledgements
- Site Index
- Disclaimer
							More Resources						- Freedom of Information Act
- Accessibility
- Information Quality
- Privacy Policy
- NOS For Employees
- USA.gov
-  Department of Commerce
-  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
-  National Ocean Service
# L_2016146EN.01003702.xml

| 3.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 146/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 146/37

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/876 of 1 June 2016 laying down the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities covered by the applications for import licences lodged from 20 May 2016 to 27 May 2016 under the tariff quotas opened by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2081 for certain cereals originating in Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 145 of 2 June 2016
  )

On page 22, in recital 3:

for:

‘The quantities covered by the applications for import licences lodged from 20 May 2016 to 27 May 2016 at 13.00 (Brussels time) exceed those available for the quota with order number 09.4306.’,

read:

‘The quantities covered by the applications for import licences lodged from 20 May 2016 from 13.00 to 27 May 2016 at 13.00 (Brussels time) exceed those available for the quota with order number 09.4306.’;

on page 22, Article 1(1):

for:

‘1.   The quantities covered by the applications for import licences under the quota with order number 09.4306 and referred to in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2081, lodged from 20 May 2016 to 27 May 2016 at 13.00 (Brussels time), shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 49,812221 % for applications lodged under the tariff quota with order number 09.4306.’,

read:

‘1.   The quantities covered by the applications for import licences under the quota with order number 09.4306 and referred to in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2081, lodged from 20 May 2016 from 13.00 to 27 May 2016 at 13.00 (Brussels time), shall be multiplied by an allocation coefficient of 49,812221 % for applications lodged under the tariff quota with order number 09.4306.’.

---
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Marc L. Reisch,certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Visant Holding Corp.;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 9, 2006 |     | /s/ Marc L.  Reisch        |
|------------------------|----------|----------------------------|
|                   |     | Marc L. Reisch             |
|                   | * * | *President  and*           |
|                   | * * | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----