alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5250 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5250

          To suspend temporarily the duty on acid orange 116.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on acid orange 116.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACID ORANGE 116.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.03.65 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to acid orange 116) is amended 
by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                at and for the periods indicated. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May                8, 2006 | /s/              Jeffrey J. Zimmer  |   |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Jeffrey                J. Zimmer         |
|                       | Chief                Executive Officer   |

| May                8, 2006 |  /s/              Robert E. Cauley |   |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Robert                E. Cauley         |
|                       | Chief                Financial Officer  |
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

 

(1)         this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)         the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gander Mountain Company.

 
| Dated:  December 15, 2009 |                                                         |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | /s/ David C. Pratt                                           |
|                           | David C. Pratt                                               |
| * *                       | *Chairman of the Board and  Interim Chief Executive Officer* |
|                           |                                                         |
|                           |                                                         |
|                           | /s/ Robert J. Vold                                           |
|                           | Robert J. Vold                                               |
| * *                       | *Senior Vice President,*                                     |
| * *                       | *Chief Financial Officer and  Treasurer*                     |

 

----
Bernard Marvin LAVALLEY v. Waynie Felarca LAVALLEY.

No. 43P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Scott E. Allen, Raleigh, for Bernard Marvin Lavalley.

J. Randal Hunter, New Bern, for Waynie Felarca Lavalley.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 19th day of January 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following *413order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
STATE of North Carolina v. William Thomas BREWER.

No. 639P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

William Thomas Brewer, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney Genera, C. Ricky Bowman, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 22nd day of December 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Surry County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
# L_2017040DE.01007901.xml

| 17.2.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 40/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 40/79

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2016/2251 der Kommission vom 4. Oktober 2016 zur Ergänzung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 648/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über OTC-Derivate, zentrale Gegenparteien und Transaktionsregister durch technische Regulierungsstandards zu Risikominderungstechniken für nicht durch eine zentrale Gegenpartei geclearte OTC-Derivatekontrakte

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 340 vom 15. Dezember 2016
  )

Seite 15, Erwägungsgrund 38:

Anstatt:

„For a group to be deemed to have adequately sound and robust risk management procedures, a number of conditions have to be met. The group should ensure a regular monitoring of the intragroup exposures, and the timely settlement of the obligations resulting from the intragroup OTC derivative contracts should be guaranteed based on the monitoring and liquidity tools at group level that are consistent with the complexity of the intragroup transactions.“

muss es heißen:

„Damit die Risikomanagementverfahren einer Gruppe als hinreichend solide und belastbar angesehen werden können, muss die Gruppe verschiedene Voraussetzungen erfüllen: Die Gruppe sollte die regelmäßige Überwachung der gruppeninternen Risikopositionen sicherstellen und die zeitnahe Abwicklung von Verpflichtungen aus gruppeninternen OTC-Derivatekontrakten sollte gewährleistet werden. Dies sollte anhand von Monitoring- und Liquiditätstools auf der Ebene der Gruppe, die an die Komplexität der gruppeninternen Geschäfte angepasst sind, erreicht werden.“

Seite 34, Artikel 31 Absatz 1 Unterabsatz 1:

Anstatt:

„Abweichend von Artikel 2 Absatz 2 können in der Union niedergelassene Gegenparteien in ihren Risikomanagementverfahren vorsehen, dass keine Nachschuss- und Ersteinschusszahlungen für nicht zentral geclearte OTC-Derivatekontrakte mit in Drittstaaten niedergelassenen Gegenparteien entgegengenommen oder geleistet werden müssen, wenn eine der folgenden Bedingungen zutrifft:“

muss es heißen:

„Abweichend von Artikel 2 Absatz 2 können in der Union niedergelassene Gegenparteien in ihren Risikomanagementverfahren vorsehen, dass keine Nachschuss- und Ersteinschusszahlungen für nicht zentral geclearte OTC-Derivatekontrakte mit in Drittstaaten niedergelassenen Gegenparteien geleistet werden müssen, wenn eine der folgenden Bedingungen zutrifft:“

---
WILSON v. McCURDY

No. COA04-1623

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed August 16, 2005

Certification Date September 6, 2005

Appeal from Iredell (04CVS457).

Cases reported without published opinion. Dismissed.
# Introduction

mailto:tara.a.butler4.civ@mail.mil

# Table of Contents

# 1.Contract Spending by State

# 2.Contract Spending by Cnty

# 3.Top Defense Vendors

# 4.Contract Spending by Type

# 5.Contract Spending by Svc

# 6.DoD Personnel Nbrs, by State

# 7.DoD Personnel Nbrs, by Cnty

# 8.DoD Personnel by Type

# 9.DoD Personnel by Service

# 10.DoD Prnl Spending, by State

# 11.DoD Prnl Spending, by Cnty

# 12.Ttl Def. Spending by State

# 13.Def Spending as % State GDP

# 14.Pct of Ttl U.S. Def. Spend

# 15.Def. Spending per Resident

# 16.All Stats, FY2021
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5247 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid black 172. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acid black 

172. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ACID BLACK 172. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.01.75 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Acid black 172) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and 

7 inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5247 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
**Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements(Form S-8 Nos. 333-59396, 333-90382, and 333-125622) pertaining to the Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1996 Stock OptionPlan, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-35533) pertaining Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1996Stock Option Plan and Employee and Consultant Stock Options, Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-70317) pertaining to the Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, andRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-34121) pertaining to Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Issuance ofShares to Employees, of our reports dated March 10, 2006 with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc., included in the AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005./s/ Ernst& Young
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Agri Products, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 28, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, L. Kenneth Cordell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: October 11, 2005



By:

/s/ L. Kenneth CordellL. Kenneth CordellPresident and Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7249

DERRICK YOUNG,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHAD WADDELL, Sergeant; BOBBY HARLESS, Superintendent; KENNETH 

JONES, Inmate Grievance Examiner; JONNITA WILLIAMS, Inmate 

Grievance Examiner; FNU CREWS, Officer; INA HINTON, 

Administrative Assistant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, 

Senior District Judge. (5:10-cv-00101-GCM)

Submitted: January 13, 2011 Decided: January 19, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Young, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Young appeals the district court’s orders 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without 

prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and 

denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Waddell, No. 

5:10-cv-00101-GCM (W.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2010 & Nov. 8, 2010). We 

deny Young’s motion for appointment of counsel and his motion to 

stay the appeal in order to allow him to submit additional 

documentation. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
STATE v. Kelvin L. GREENFIELD.

No. 443P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 18th day of August 2005 by Defendant for Petition for Writ of Certiorari to review the order of the NC Court of Appeals:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of October 2005."
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 126 (Friday, July 1, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 39339]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14301]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

32 CFR Part 842


Administrative Claims

CFR Correction

    This rule is being published by the Office of the Federal Register 
to correct an editorial or technical error that appeared in the most 
recent annual revision of the Code of Federal Regulations.

0
In Title 32 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 800 to End, 
revised as of July 1, 2021, in Sec.  842.55, reinstate paragraph (r) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  842.55  Claims not payable

* * * * *
    (r) Is one for which a foreign government is responsible under 
SOFA, treaty, or other agreement. However, AFLOA/JACC may authorize 
payment of a claim where the foreign government refuses to recognize 
its legal responsibilities and the claimant has no other means of 
compensation.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2022-14301 Filed 6-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099-10-P
94 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

RHODE ISLAND

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$715.5 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

18,188

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

 Military

Newport 13,074 7,489 4,661

Washington 1,287 ND 321

Providence 1,058 211 239

Kent 993 42 69

Bristol 194 ND ND

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 19%

Active Duty: 52%

Civilian: 29%

25%

65%

10%

0%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

By Type

Service: 51%

Construction: 6%

Research and 

Development: 3%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 40%

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions)

Raytheon $244.5 M

L-3 Communications $41.1 M

SAIC $27.7 M

McLaughlin Research Corporation $23.3 M

Korte Company $22.4 M

Rite-Solutions $16.5 M

BAE Systems $15.3 M

Mikel $15.3 M

ICI Services $13.1 M

Tetra Tech $12.8 M

$0.8 $0.8

$0.7

$0.6 $0.6

$0.8 $0.8 $0.8 4%

87%

0%

9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 95

Newport

Providence 

Kent

Washington 

Bristol

Newport

Providence 

Kent

Washington 

Bristol

Newport County

$623.5 M

Providence County

$34.6 M

Washington County 

$28.2 M

Kent County

$12.7 M

Bristol County

$1.2 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions) (M=millions)

Newport County

$658.8 M

Washington County

$54.3 M

Providence County

$27.8 M

Kent County

$13.5 M

Bristol County

$6.3 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

#41

$1.5 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#16

2.5% OF STATE GDP

0.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$1,397

PER RESIDENT

#43

$0.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#36

18,188 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#35

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 RHODE ISLAND

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active
Scott E. MAYE v. Theodis BECK, Secretary of Prison.

No. 306P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 8, 2005.

Scott E. Maye, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State of NC.

*666*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 3rd day of June 2005 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Greene County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 8th day of June 2005."
NEWBERNE v. CRIME CONTROL, et al.

No. 75A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 10, 2005.

J. Heydt Philbeck, Raleigh, for Reginald Newberne.

Donald K. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, for Dept. of Crime Control, et al.

Mark A. Davis, Raleigh, for Asso. of County Commissioners.

J. Michael McGuinnness, Elizabethtown, for NC Troopers Association.

Thomas A. Harris, New Bern, for State Employees Asso. of NC.

Shelagh Rebecca Kenney, for NC Academy of Trial Lawyers & AC.

The following order has been entered on the joint motion filed on the 10th day of May 2005 by Amici to participate in oral argument by the N.C. Troopers Association, the N.C. Academy of Trial Lawyers, and the American *291Civil Liberties Union of NC Legal Foundation:

"Motion Allowed. Amici (N.C. Troopers Association, the N.C. Academy of Trial Lawyers, and the American Civil Liberties Union of N.C. Legal Foundation) granted six minutes of Appellant's time. By order of the Court in conference this the 10th day of May 2005."
DAUGHERTY v. MOUNTAIN CONST. ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. COA04-1177

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #120931).

Case without published opinion. Appeal dismissed.
H. R. 521

One Hundred Tenth Congress

of the

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and seven 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2633 11th 

Street in Rock Island, Illinois, as the ‘‘Lane Evans Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LANE EVANS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2633 11th Street in Rock Island, Illinois, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Lane Evans Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Lane Evans Post Office Building’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VII, L.P. (the Partnership) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, General Partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 23, 2010



|                                                                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                                                                                    
|Dean L. Cash President and
Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be retained by the Partnership and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# ***Exhibit 32.1***

# * *

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Advanced Accessory Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terence C. Seikel,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations of theCompany.

 
|    /s/  Terence C. Seikel |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Terence C.  Seikel                       |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer   |
| (Principal  Executive Officer)           |
| May 12, 2004                             |

 

18

----