alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.3**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Marc L. Reisch,certify that:

1.               Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Visant Corporation;

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               Eachregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for each such registrant and we have:

a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to such registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring this period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of such registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosedin this report any change in such registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter hathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, suchregistrants’ internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               Eachregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of such registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect such registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in such registrants’ internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 11, 2006 | /s/ Marc L.  Reisch        |
|-----------------------|----------------------------|
|                  | Marc L. Reisch             |
|                  | *President  and*           |
|                  | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

----
Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter Citation Limited Pursuant to 1st Cir. Loc. R. 32.3 

# United Stat es Court of Appeals

For the First C ircuit

No. 00-1202 UNITED STATES, Appellee,
v. ALI HUSSEIN ADDO, Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. George A. O'Toole, Jr., U.S. District Judge ]
Before Lynch, Circuit Judge , Campbell and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges .
Ali Hussein Addo on brief pro se. Michael J. Sull ivan , United States Attorney, and Timothy Q. Feeley , Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
August 26, 2003-2- Per Curiam . Ali Hussein Addo pled guilty to one count of defrauding Eastern Bank, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344. Addo opened an Eastern Bank bank account using a false
name and identif icat ion document, deposited into the account approximately$30,000 of worthless checks and thereafter withdrew $9,503.75 before the account was closed by the bank. Addo has appealed. We affirm .

We first not e th at Addo erroneously claims that he entereda conditional plea. That contention is plainly wrong. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(a)(2). And, to the extent that there was any "condition" to his plea agreement -- and the evidence
on this point is sparse at best -- Addo's descri ption of the allege dco ndition is so implausible as to be incredible. According to Addo, the government agreed not to prosecute him in any way at anytime for fraudulent activity with respect to Flee t Bank accounts. The government concedes that it agreed that, in computing "intended loss" for purposes of sentencing Addo for his scheme to defraud Eastern Bank, it would not include any loss to Fleet Bank with respect to accounts held in the name of Farah Kalif Adan and Yusuf Ali. Fleet Bank ATM cards issued in those names we re found in Addo's possession when he was arrested.

Even were we to accept Addo's contention that any side agreement covered prosecution a nd n ot simply sentencing-3-

calculat ion, at best, the agreement could conceivably have concernedonly past fraudulent activity with respect to the Farah Kalif Adan and Yusuf Ali Fleet Bank accounts and not future fraudulent activity. And, Addo proffers no evidence that he has been charged with any fraudulent activity with respect to these accounts. Therefore, contrary to Addo's contention, the government has not violated any "condition" to his plea agreement. Addo's claim that the government agreed to immunize him from prosecution for any fraudulent activity with respect to any Fleet Bank account at any time is simply preposterous.

We have considered the remaini n g issues raised by Addo in his appellate brief and con clude they are without merit. Addo's motion for an expedited appeal is moot.

Affirmed .
MICHIGAN 

#24 #41 1.1% $685 #22 #29 #30

$6.8 B SPENT IN 1.3% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $5.5 B CONTRACT 26,245 NUMBER OF $1.4 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 7%

Service: 21%

Supplies and

Equipment: 71% 

By Service 

Army

73%

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

7%

Other Defense

11%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 4%

e: 18%

Civilian: 

nal 

: 41%

37%

d

Reserv

Natio

Guar

Allocations, By Service 

Army

73%

Navy/Marines

9%

Air Force

12%

Other Defense

6%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

General Dynamics $2.1 B

L3Harris Technologies $341.4 M

Loc Performance Products $199.2 M

Williams International Co. $192.7 M

ManTech $184.8 M

BAE Systems $184.7 M

Grand River Aseptic Manufacturing Inc. $160.0 M

Peckham Vocational Industries $96.7 M

Aircraft Appliances and Equipment Limited $91.6 M

General Electric $68.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$5.5 $5.0 $5.1

$3.1

FY13 FY14 FY16

$2.8 $2.7 $2.8

$1.1

FY15 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

$1.4 BILLION 26,245

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Macomb 238 6,691 1,433

Calhoun 52 1,300 990

Wayne 210 334 1,381

Kalamazoo 13 87 971

Kent 50 95 768

Oakland 59 249 180

Clinton ND ND 880

Ingham 158 470 141

Eaton 38 70 539

Saginaw ND ND 338

Reserve Total

1,084 9,446

420 2,762

428 2,353

738 1,809

274 1,187

589 1,077

147 ND

ND ND

ND ND

290 ND

62 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MICHIGAN 

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Macomb

Oakland

Kent

Muskegon

Wayne

Washtenaw

Wexford

Dickinson

Calhoun

Clinton

(M = millions)

$3.0 B 

$430.4 M 

$348.5 M 

$338.5 M 

$296.9 M 

$139.9 M 

$126.2 M 

$109.8 M 

$71.9 M 

$69.9 M 

Macomb

Calhoun

Wayne

Clinton

Ingham

Oakland

Kalamazoo

Kent

Eaton

Washtenaw

$763.8 M 

$150.5 M 

$83.5 M 

$53.9 M 

$40.3 M 

$40.0 M 

$37.1 M 

$33.6 M 

$23.8 M 

$19.3 M 

Dickinson

Wexford

Muskegon

Macomb

Wayne

Washtenaw

Kent

Ingham

Eaton

Calhoun

Kent

Washtenaw

Wayne

Macomb

Clinton

Oakland

Kalamazoo

Oakland

Calhoun

Clinton

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

63
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The followingcertification accompanies the issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2007, and is not filed, as provided in Release33-8212, 34-47551.

In connection withthe accompanying Quarterly Report of Treaty Oak Bancorp, Inc. (“Treaty Oak”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey L.Nash, President and Chief Executive Officer of Treaty Oak, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Treaty Oak.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TreatyOak and will be retained by Treaty Oak and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Dated: August 13, 2007 |                                  |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                   |                                  |
|                   |                                  |
|                   | /s/ Jeffrey L. Nash                   |   |
|                   | Jeffrey L. Nash                       |
|                   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Frederic H. Moll, M.D., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hansen Medical, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.August 14, 2007   /s/ Frederic H. Moll, M.D   Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mountain Valley Bancshares, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principals;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ Rachel MarshallDate: November 14, 2008
    Rachel MarshallChief Financial Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 8, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132018 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

HOUDINI PROPERTIES, LLC, Marilyn Kelly 

Plaintiff-Appellant, Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, v SC: 132018 Justices COA: 266338 
 Wayne CC: 05-504139-CZ

CITY OF ROMULUS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 13, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed at oral argument: 

(1) whether the claim of appeal to the Wayne Circuit Court from the City of Romulus 

Zoning Board of Appeals’ (ZBA) variance denial was a “pleading” to which the 

compulsory joinder rule of MCR 2.203(A) applies, so as to require the plaintiff to assert 

and include its taking claim in the same document as its claim of appeal; (2) whether, 

when the plaintiff filed its claim of appeal to the Wayne Circuit Court from the ZBA’s 

variance denial, the plaintiff’s claim was ripe for review under the rule in Paragon 

Properties Co v Novi, 452 Mich 568, 583 (1996), which requires a property owner to 

obtain “a final decision from which an actual or concrete injury can be determined” 

before asserting a constitutional taking claim; and (3) whether, once the Wayne Circuit 

Court affirmed the plaintiff’s appeal, pursuant to MCL 125.585(11) (now MCL 

125.3606(1)), of the ZBA’s variance denial, that determination was res judicata with 

respect to the plaintiff’s constitutional taking claim. The parties may file supplemental 

briefs within 49 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere 

restatements of their application papers. 

The Appellate Practice, Litigation, and Real Property Law Sections of the State 

Bar of Michigan are invited to file a brief or briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or 

groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the 

Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. 

p0605 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 8, 2007 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Six, Inc., (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of September 30, 2004, and for the period then ended.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Bryan Peery         
|Bryan Peery             
|Chief Accounting Officer
|                        
|November 4, 2004
# L_2021048EN.01000301.xml

| 11.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 48/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 48/3

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 84 of 31 March 2016
  )

| (1) | On page 71, point (a) of Article 81: |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On page 71, point (a) of Article 81:

for:

‘ ... in Article 30(1) ...’,

read:

‘ ... in Article 31(1) ...’.

| (2) | On page 143, in point (d)(iii) of Article 227: |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On page 143, in point (d)(iii) of Article 227:

for:

‘... in Articles 165 and 168...’,

read:

‘... in Articles 167 and 168...’.

---
GARLAND v. HATLEY

No. COA04-1131

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed August 16, 2005

Certification Date September 6, 2005

Appeal from Lincoln (02CVS1380).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIAL v. FLEMING ENG.

No. 107A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2004.

C.J. Childers, for Fleming Engineering, Inc.

R. Bruce Thompson, II, Raleigh, for Associated Industrial Contractor.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of April 2004 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Defendant (Fleming Engineering, Inc.) shall have up to and including the 7th day of May 2004 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of April 2004."
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

## Filings Instituting Proceedings

*Docket Numbers:*                     RP22-991-000.                

*Applicants:*                     Equitrans, L.P.                

*Description:*                     Compliance filing: Notice Regarding Non-Certificated Gathering Facilities (M-73 System) to be effective N/A.                

*Filed Date:*                     6/23/22.                

*Accession Number:*                     20220623-5143.                

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. ET 7/5/22.                

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

                    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system (                    *https://elibrary.ferc.gov/​idmws/​search/​fercgensearch.asp*) by querying the docket number.                

                    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at:                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.*                     For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                

Dated: June 24, 2022.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-14010 Filed 6-29-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P