alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.15    
    


 
 

CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC.
  NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY    
    


The
following sets forth the compensation policy for non-employee members of the board of directors (the "Board") of CF Industries Holdings, Inc.: 



Annual Cash Retainer  


$30,000,
payable in arrears quarterly. The Chairperson of the Company's Audit Committee shall also be paid an additional annual retainer of $5,000 which shall be paid in the same manner. 


Annual Restricted Stock Grant  


Each
non-employee director will receive, upon joining the Board, a restricted stock grant with a fair market value of $65,000. The restricted stock grant will vest on the first annual
meeting of the Company's shareholders that follows the date of the grant or one year after the date of the grant, whichever occurs first. Thereafter, each continuing non-employee director will receive
a restricted stock grant with a fair market value of $65,000 on the date of each annual meeting of the Company's shareholders. These shares of restricted stock will vest as described above. 


Meeting Fees  


$1,500
for each Board meeting attended ($500 for telephonic attendance). 


$1,250
for each Board committee meeting attended, other than Committee meetings held in conjunction with Board meetings ($425 for telephonic attendance). 



Non-employee
directors will be reimbursed for reasonably incurred out-of-pocket meeting expenses. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.15


CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, INC. NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, David A. Tayeh,certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Jostens Holding Corp.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and we have:

 

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during this period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  May 14, 2004 | /s/  David A. Tayeh                   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                     | David A. Tayeh                                  |
|                     | Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

----
JOHNSON v. MAGNETTI-MARELLI USA, INC.

No. COA04-1676

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. 162623).

Cases reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
82 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Pfizer, Inc. $16.7 B

Lockheed Martin $2.3 B

L3Harris Technologies $1.7 B

BAE Systems $177.0 M

SRC $150.0 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $141.2 M

St. Vincent's Catholic Medical Centers of NY $117.9 M

Saab AB $111.4 M

WPP, PLC $108.9 M

Jamaica Bearings $106.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

NEW YORK

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.9 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

57,965

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Jefferson 14,702 2,161 83 219 17,165

Orange 1,666 2,464 1,652 873 6,655

Onondaga 193 479 1,557 649 2,878

Oneida 69 1,799 679 261 2,808

Niagara 21 537 763 1,424 2,745

Queens 52 101 486 1,882 2,521

Albany 175 1,368 875 32 2,450

Schenectady 19 284 1,514 524 2,341

Suffolk 39 284 1,561 440 2,324

Kings 216 349 629 1,103 2,297

Construction: 1% 

Research and Development: 3%

Service: 5%

Supplies and Equipment: 91%

Active Duty: 32%

Civilian: 20%

National 

Guard: 28%

Reserve: 20%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

78%

13%

4%

6%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

71%

8%

16%

5%

$5.2 $5.1 $5.5 $6.0 $4.5

$8.0

$26.3

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#5 #32 5.0% $1,430 #4 #3 #15 #17

$28.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.4% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$24.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

57,965 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$711.5 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$24.5
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 83

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEW YORK

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

New York

Monroe

Tioga

Onondaga

Suffolk

Oneida

Nassau

Orange

Erie

Jefferson

(M = millions)

$17.2 B

$1.8 B

$1.4 B

$1.1 B

$610.3 M

$539.4 M

$456.6 M

$323.0 M

$213.9 M

$161.6 M

Jefferson

Orange

Oneida

Albany

Onondaga

New York

Niagara

Suffolk

Schenectady

Nassau

$975.0 M

$430.3 M

$174.8 M

$167.1 M

$128.7 M

$106.4 M

$104.6 M

$98.5 M

$98.1 M

$91.5 M

Monroe

Erie

Oneida 

Onondaga

Orange

New York

Tioga

Nassau

Suffolk

Jefferson

Jefferson

Schenectady

Onondaga

Oneida

Niagara

Albany

Orange

Nassau

New York

Suffolk
STYLE: v. FILECOPY 

### RE: Case No. 13-0986 DATE: 6/12/2015 COA #: 12-11-00370-CV TC#: 06CV-29005 SOUTHWESTERN ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY TOBY BERRY-HELFAND AND GERY MUNCEY 

### An amicus curiae brief was this day received and 

### placedwith the record in the above-referenced case.

MS. CATHY S. LUSK 

### CLERK, TWELFTH COURT OF 

### 1517 WEST FRONT, SUITE 

### TYLER, TX 75702 APPEALS -*• r~ ~>, !~ / 35A

• gs

r~3DT ~ o ri.cz Y •J> 3P tS<^—,^

# T OF AP ppeais 0 m\ w' "D 2D \


# £ALS trict
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation 
of our report dated February 17, 1999 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-16385, File
No. 333-35937 and File No. 333-56171) and on Form S-3 (File No. 333-66793).



                                                /s/  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
                                                ________________________
                                                  ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

San Jose, California
March 31, 1999
Exhibit 99.3

            Annual Statement of Trust
          The CIT RV Owner Trust 1996-A
        Class A 5.40 % Asset Backed Notes
        5.85 % Asset Backed Certificates

                 Exhibit to 10K
          For the Year Ending 12/31/96

1.  Aggregate Principal & Interest Received on      68,066,285.34
Contracts

2.  Aggregate Amount of Liquidation Proceeds           894,592.10

3.  Repurchased Contracts                                4,151.46

4.  Aggregate Net Servicer Advances                    170,794.93

5.  Transfer from Capitalized Interest Account         815,983.02

6.  Investment Earnings on Collection Account           18,183.01

7.  Transfer from Prefunding Account                     1,296.75

8.  Aggregate Distribution made in respect of
Interest:
      (a)  Note Interest @ 5.40 %                   10,560,502.67
      (b)  Certificate Interest @ 5.85 %               737,340.95
                                                    11,297,843.62
Total Interest Distributions

9.  Aggregate Distribution made in respect of
Principal:
      (a)  Note Principal Distributions             50,731,795.83
      (b)  Certificate Principal Distributions              71.32
                                                    50,731,867.15
Total Principal Distributions

10.  Aggregate Amounts paid to the Holder of GP      5,898,645.74
Interest

11.  Aggregate Amounts paid to the Servicer          2,010,555.02

12.  Aggregate Interest paid on Cash Collateral         32,375.08
Loan

Delinquency Information as of 12/31/96:           Amount            Number
                                                  ----------------  -----------
      (a)  31-59 Days                                2,907,233.75           100
      (b)  60-89 Days                                  819,131.16            34
      (c)  90 Days or more                             514,757.33            21

Contracts Liquidated in 1996                         2,265,140.16            82
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

KRISTY ANN EVANS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-4090

DAVID EDWARD MILLER,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed October 12, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Marion County,

Jennifer Bass, Judge.

Kristy Ann Evans, Fort Lauderdale, 

pro se.

Linda A. Wagner, of Middleton & 

Middleton, P.A., Melrose, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The former wife, Kristy Ann Evans, appeals the trial court’s order granting the 

former husband’s, David Edward Miller, supplemental petition to modify timesharing, the 

parenting plan, and child support. The former wife argues that we “should revisit the 

issues” to determine whether the trial court properly granted the former husband’s 

supplemental petition.

Because we do not have a transcript of the proceedings below, we cannot address 

the former wife’s contention that the trial court’s decision on the issues is without 
2

evidentiary support. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 

1152 (Fla. 1979). Thus, we must affirm unless the former wife can demonstrate that 

“fundamental error appears on the face of the appealed order.” Murphy v. Murphy, 948 

So. 2d 864, 865 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). The former wife has made no such showing in this 

case. 

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
NAIL v. MEMBER SERVICES, INC.

No. COA05-26.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Forsyth (04CVS1813).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
----

|   | 1. | The                periodic report containing financial statements to which this certificate                is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of                1934. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the periodic report to which this certificate                is                an exhibit fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial                condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                           |                                         |   |
|------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |                                         |   |
| Date: March                31, 2006  | /s/                Roberta J. Morris    |   |
|                                           | Roberta                J. Morris             |
|                                           | Chief                Financial Officer  |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Helicos BioSciences Corporation (the "Company") for the
quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Ivan Trifunovich, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company and
Jeffrey R. Moore, the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge that:



Dated: May 13, 2011

/s/ IVAN TRIFUNOVICH Ivan Trifunovich President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: May 13, 2011

/s/ JEFFREY R. MOORE Jeffrey R. Moore Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Helicos BioSciences Corporation and will be retained by Helicos BioSciences Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Fresenius Medical Care
AG (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Dr. Ben Lipps, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Management Board of the Company and Lawrence Rosen, Chief Financial Officer and
Member of the Management Board of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
           of the Company.

/s/ DR. BEN LIPPS
---------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Ben Lipps
Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Management Board
March 1, 2005

/s/ LAWRENCE ROSEN
---------------------------------------------------------
Lawrence Rosen
Chief Financial Officer
March 1, 2005
STATE of North Carolina v. Christopher Albert TARANTINO.

No. 492P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 6, 2005.

Joseph B. Cheshire, Raleigh, Sean P. Devereux, Asheville, for Tarantino.

Michael Bonfoey, District Attorney, for State.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 6th day of September 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Cherokee County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed Without Prejudice to Re-file in Court of Appeals, N.C.R.App. P. 21(b) by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of September 2005."
Exhibit







June 10, 2019




Manavendra Sial
15223 Brightfield Manor Drive
Chesterfield, MO 63017


Dear Manavendra,


Pursuant to our discussions with you, we will provide the following:


		
	1.
	Limited Acceleration of Vesting.  SunPower Corporation (“SunPower” or “we”) will provide limited acceleration of vesting of outstanding restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance-based RSUs (“PSUs”) that are scheduled to vest by 2020, if you are terminated without Cause (as defined in your employment agreement effective as of May 2, 2018 (“Employment Agreement”)) prior to December 5, 2020.  The awards subject to accelerated vesting are listed in the table below.  




	
					
	Award ID
	Award Date
	Award Type
	# of Units
	Vest Date

	RSU-45898
	12/14/2018
	RSU
	80,000
	12/5/2019

	PSU-45914
	2/12/2019
	PSU
	20,000
	3/1/2020

	RSU-45908
	2/12/2019
	RSU
	20,000
	3/1/2020

	RSU-N43351
	5/18/2018
	RSU
	25,000
	5/5/2020

	RSU-45898
	12/14/2018
	RSU
	80,000
	12/5/2020






		
	2.
	Relocation Assistance.  In order to assist you with your relocation to San Jose, California, we will provide you with relocation benefits consistent with SunPower’s U.S. Relocation Policy – Vice President and Above, except as set forth in this paragraph. We will cap the home purchase value to a maximum of USD $2.5 million, provide you with a miscellaneous relocation allowance of $25,000 (not subject to tax gross-up), and provide you with temporary housing for 30 days.  To be eligible for all the benefits of the relocation program, you must work with the designated relocation partner approved service providers.  In the event of your voluntary or involuntary termination for Cause before December 31, 2020, you will be required to repay relocation assistance payments as follows: such relocation assistance payments shall vest in equal monthly installments between July 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020 and, if terminated as described above, you (i) will repay any unvested payments already made and (ii) will not be entitled to receive any future payments. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the relocation assistance payments shall not exceed $300,000 in the aggregate.




Your signature on this letter will evidence your agreement with the terms and conditions set forth herein.  In accepting this agreement, you give assurance that you have not relied on any agreements or representations, express or implied, with respect to this offer that are not set forth expressly in this letter.  Nothing in this letter changes other terms and conditions included in your RSU and PSU award agreements or Employment Agreement, including without limitation the at-will nature of your employment.


















Sincerely,




/s/ Doug Richards
Doug Richards
EVP, Administration
SunPower Corporation


I accept the offer of accelerated vesting and relocation assistance set forth above:


Signature:  /s/ MANAVENDRA S. SIAL                                                                              Date:  July 1, 2019
Manavendra Sial
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Green Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, J. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 14th day of October, 2010.








Doug FraterJ. Douglas Frater, Chief Executive Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5278 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Option and Revolver 

herbicides. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mrs. CAPITO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Option and 

Revolver herbicides. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OPTION AND REVOLVER HERBICIDES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.37 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Option and Revolver herbicides) is amended by striking 

7 the date in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/ 

8 31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5278 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS