alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Topics
3. Hazards

Ocean and Coastal Hazards From hurricanes to coastal erosion to oil spills, our ocean and coastal areas face many hazards. Explore our curated list of stories about these topics.


Sea Level Rise
 Coastal Hazards
  Hurricanes
  Beach Dangers
  Harmful Algal Blooms
 Hypoxia
   Disaster Response Center
 Marine Debris
  Oil and Chemical Spills
  NOAA Historical Hurricane Tracks
  A Guide to Plastic in the Ocean
 NOAA Emergency Response Imagery
   Five Sea Creatures to Avoid at the Shore


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
# Official Journal L 161/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 161 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 647 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 161

English edition

Legislation

Volume 647 May 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Decision (EU) 2021/752 of the European Central Bank of 30 April 2021 amending Decision (EU) 2019/1311 on a third series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations (ECB/2021/21) | 1 |
| | | RULES OF PROCEDURE |
| | * | Decision No 2021-096 Rev 1 of the Management Board of the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice of 16 April 2021 on internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to the processing of personal data in the framework of the functioning of the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of the Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice | 9 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Decision (EU) 2021/752 of the European Central Bank of 30 April 2021 amending Decision (EU) 2019/1311 on a third series of targeted longer-term refinancing operations (ECB/2021/21)

1

RULES OF PROCEDURE

*

Decision No 2021-096 Rev 1 of the Management Board of the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice of 16 April 2021 on internal rules concerning restrictions of certain rights of data subjects in relation to the processing of personal data in the framework of the functioning of the European Union Agency for the Operational Management of the Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice

9

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
LEARY v. N.C. FOREST PRODUCTS, INC.

No. COA04-1470.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. Kyle BERRY.

No. 389A01-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

William F.W. Massengale, Chapel Hill, for Kyle Berry.

William N. Farrell, Senior Deputy Attorney General, John Carriker, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of May 2005 by Defendant to Extend Time to Serve Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 16th day of June 2005 to serve his/her proposed record upon the district attorney. The parties shall then proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12. By order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2005."
Richard Alan KING, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-6995

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
STATE v. Rodney Earl COFFIN.

No. 405P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 4, 2005.

Winifred H. Dillon, Raleigh, Michael Nifong, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 3rd day of August 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of August 2005."
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017080EN.01004601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 25.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 80/46 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1824 of 14 July 2016 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 3/2014, Delegated Regulation (EU) No 44/2014 and Delegated Regulation (EU) No 134/2014 with regard, respectively, to vehicle functional safety requirements, to vehicle construction and general requirements and to environmental and propulsion unit performance requirements

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 279 of 15 October 2016](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2016_279_R_TOC)
)

On page 3, in Article 2 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 44/2014, point (1):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | in Article 3(2), “Manufacturers” is replaced by “Manufacturers of parts and equipment”;’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(1) | in Article 3(3), “Manufacturers” is replaced by “Manufacturers of parts and equipment”;’. |

---
HomeOcean Facts

# What is spat? 

## Once **oyster larvae** permanently attach to a surface, they are known as **spat**.

 Once oyster larvae attach to a surface, such as other oyster shells, they are known as spat (shown in inset image). As generation after generation of spat grow into adult oysters, they form dense clusters known as oyster reefs or beds.

Oysters are a type of shellfish that live in brackish and  saltwater bays, estuaries, and tidal creeks. When oysters reproduce, they spawn  tiny larvae that freely navigate the water column until they find an  appropriate habitat with a structure to settle on. Once the larvae permanently  attach to a surface, they are known as spat.

Oysters are frequently cultivated for food and pearls. The successful farming of  oysters and other shellfish relies upon successful settlement of larvae onto a  selected substrate—typically other oyster shells or ceramic tiles—within a  hatchery or wild setting. The tiles or shells that hold the spat are secured to  frames or in cages and submerged along an intertidal area or suspended from a  long line. From this point forward, the oysters are self-sustaining, filtering  all the nutrients they need directly from the water in their environment.

Because oysters are filter feeders, they help keep the water clean. This promotes the growth of underwater grasses, such as wild celery, which serve as important habitat for other species. In addition, oyster beds form large, complex structures where many  aquatic species, such as fish and crabs, hunt for food and hide from predators. 

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          -  What is a bivalve mollusk?
          - What is aquaculture?
          -  Oysters In the Chesapeake Bay: K-12 NOAA Curriculum

Did you know?

Oyster farming is a great way to improve water quality! A NOAA study  found that shellfish aquaculture helps to remove excess nutrients and reduce eutrophication from our waterways. Eutrophication—excessive nutrient input into estuarine and coastal environments—can lead to algal blooms, oxygen depletion, fish kills, and a loss of key habitats. 

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL

1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 218 

Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 

certification@osc.govU0T

SPEAKER REQUEST FORM 

(Non-Federal Requester)

Questions about completing this form may be directed to 0TUcertification@osc.gov.U0T

1. General Event Information

a. Title and description of event:

b. Event sponsor(s):

c. Event dates:

d. Event location:

2. Sponsor Contact Person for Proposed OSC Presentation:

a. Name:

b. Address:

c. Phone Number:

d. Email address:

3. Type and Topic of Presentation (e.g., Prohibited Personnel Practices, Hatch Act,

other):

4. OSC Presentation Details:

a. Date:

b. Time:

c. Location:

5. Will payment of speaker’s travel-related expenses be offered? (Payment of such

expenses is not required for consideration of this request.) Yes No

If yes, please complete the following:

Nature of Expense

(e.g., plane ticket, hotel room, meals, rental car,

waiver of conference fee, other)

Payment Source 

(if not event 

sponsor)

Payment to

OSC by check (C) 

or in-kind (K)

Payment

amount
6. If any payment in item 5 table will be from a source other than event sponsor, are

you aware of any case(s) involving the payment source pending at OSC?

Yes No 

If yes, please indicate the status of the case(s), to your knowledge: 

7. Has event sponsor had any case involvement with OSC within the last five years?

Yes No 

8. Are you aware of any case(s) pending at OSC involving event sponsor?

Yes No 

If yes, please indicate the status of the case(s), to your knowledge: 

9. How many people will be in attendance at the event?

10. How many people do you expect to be in attendance at the OSC presentation?

11. Will the OSC presentation be videotaped? Yes No 

If yes, to whom will the videotape be broadcast?

12. What type of merit system training has this audience received? Please be specific

and use additional paper if necessary:

13. Is the audience primarily:

Managers, 

 First-line supervisors, 

Personnelists/attorneys 

Nonsupervisory employees 

Please indicate the representative occupations. 

14. Can you have the following available for the presentation:

Computer compatible w/ Microsoft Power-Point and

projector?

 Yes No 

Microphone? Yes No 

Podium or table Yes No 
15. Please briefly describe the layout of the room for the presentation:

16. Please indicate the name and address of person to whom the presenter can send

handouts before the presentation:

17. If the OSC training is part of a larger training conference, please provide an

agenda for the conference. If agenda is currently unavailable, please provide one

as soon as possible.
46 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

INDIANA 

#23

$7.2 B SPENT IN 

#28

1.6% OF STATE GDP

1.3%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,059

PER RESIDENT 

#21

$5.7 B CONTRACT 

#26

31,044 NUMBER OF 

#28

$1.5 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Development: 6% Construction: 0%

Service: 18%

Supplies and

Equipment: 76%

By Service 

Army

48%

Navy/Marines

27%

Air Force

15%

Other Defense

10%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 3% Reserve: 17%

Civilian: 39%

National 

Guard: 41%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

53%

Navy/Marines

19%

Air Force

14%

Other Defense

14%

Top Defense Contractors 

Eli Lilly and Co.

Rolls-Royce

Raytheon Technologies

AM General

ERAPSCO

SAIC

AmeriQual Group

ManTech TSG-2, JV

Calumet Shreveport Fuels

Allison Transmission

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.9 B

$1.0 B

$469.1 M

$326.6 M

$171.2 M

$144.8 M

$138.0 M

$85.2 M

$67.7 M

$63.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$5.7

$4.0

FY19

$3.6 $3.2 $3.0 $3.0 $3.1

$2.3

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY20 FY21

$1.5 BILLION 31,044

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Marion 337 5,481 2,368

Martin 69 4,986 0 

Johnson 333 245 1,435

Miami 18 535 29 

Allen 39 251 1,411

Vigo 23 155 944 

Lake ND 64 452 

St. Joseph 74 57 265

Tippecanoe 59 30 396

Vanderburgh 32 31 371 

Reserve

1,388

0 

359 

1,721

335 

159 

173 

288 

120 

148 

Total

9,574

5,055

2,372

2,303

2,036

1,281

ND 

684

605

582 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

Johnson

Lawrence

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Marion

Martin

St. Joseph

Allen

Whitley

Vanderburgh

Daviess

Bartholomew

Lawrence

Johnson

(M = millions)

$3.5 B

$503.7 M

$459.5 M

$286.7 M

$185.0 M

$147.3 M

$54.7 M

$43.0 M

$37.2 M

$37.2 M

Marion

Martin

Johnson

Miami

Allen

Vigo

St. Joseph

Tippecanoe

Lake

Shelby

$584.1 M

$453.7 M

$92.9 M

$74.8 M

$65.0 M

$42.9 M

$20.6 M

$20.2 M

$19.2 M

$16.3 M

Whitley

Allen

St. Joseph

Marion

Bartholomew

Martin Daviess

Vanderburgh

St. Joseph

Allen

Lake

Tippecanoe

Miami

Marion

Martin

Shelby

Johnson

Vigo

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 4

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

7

INDIANA
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commerce Energy Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) for the quarterly period ending January 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard L. Boughrum, Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: June 14, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ RICHARD L. BOUGHRUMRICHARD L. BOUGHRUMSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Reid A. PAGE, Jr. and wife, Mary Ann Page v. BALD HEAD ASSOCIATION, James E. Wilson, Judy Brawner, Karen Christian, Dale Georgiade, Jack Nichols, and Bill Waddell, Sr., in their official capacity as directors of Bald Head Association.

No. 304P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Reid A. & Mary Ann Page.

*543G. Grady Richardson, Jr., for Bald Head Asso., et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of June 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF COAST DENTAL SERVICES, INC. FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      44,177,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,738,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,097,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,858,797
<PP&E>                                       9,964,516
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,437,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              67,526,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,812,638
<BONDS>                                        958,414
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,615
<OTHER-SE>                                  61,747,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                67,526,530
<SALES>                                      7,288,379
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,288,379
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,862,615
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,766
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,522,766
<INCOME-TAX>                                   549,963
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            972,803
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      633,813
<NET-INCOME>                                   338,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 49 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

  1st Session
                                 H. R. 49

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 31, 2007

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1300 North Frontage Road West in Vail, Colorado, as the ``Gerald R. 
                   Ford, Jr. Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GERALD R. FORD, JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1300 North Frontage Road West in Vail, Colorado, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Gerald R. Ford, Jr. Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Gerald R. 
Ford, Jr. Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 29, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
STATE v. EBRON

No. COA04-917

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 4, 2005

Certification Date October 24, 2005

Appeal from Pitt (03CRS9847, 03CRS57799).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error in part; remaanded for a new sentencing hearing in part.