alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,

UNITED STATES CODE,
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Johannes C. Keltjens, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of ANGIODYNAMICS, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 8, 2011



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Johannes C. Keltjens                                
|Johannes C. Keltjens, President, Chief Executive Officer
38 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $1.4 B

Georgia Tech Research Corp. $557.1 M

International Auto Logistics $162.7 M

Northrop Grumman $126.9 M

VMLY&R $115.3 M

RQ Construction, LLC $110.7 M

General Dynamics $105.8 M

State of Georgia $83.6 M

Envistacom $77.6 M

ACC Construction $72.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

GEORGIA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$7.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

124,079

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Muscogee 18,180 4,237 462 648 23,527

Houston 3,215 14,605 1,162 1,365 20,347

Liberty 15,600 2,484 532 118 18,734

Richmond 10,757 3,426 541 1,520 16,244

Cobb 284 1,242 2,869 3,211 7,606

Chatham 4,252 1,165 1,635 378 7,430

Lowndes 4,330 523 73 247 5,173

Camden 2,455 2,519 0 ND ND

Clayton 45 519 459 2,273 3,296

Dougherty 336 1,826 94 108 2,364

Construction: 8%

Research and

Development: 9%

Service: 48%

Supplies and

Equipment: 35%

Active Duty: 51%

Civilian: 28%

National 

Guard: 11%

Reserve: 10%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

29%

15%

41%

14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

60%

11%

24%

5%

$5.0

$9.1

$5.8 $5.9 $6.1

$7.7

$6.6 $6.0

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#15 #26 2.4% $1,226 #20 #19 #6 #8

$13.4 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.8% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$6.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

124,079 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$7.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$158.6 M GRANT 

SPENDING
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022 39

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 GEORGIA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Cobb

Fulton

Houston

Richmond

Camden

Chattahoochee

Chatham

Glynn

Liberty

Gwinnett

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.6 B

$1.0 B

$782.9 M

$425.1 M

$416.8 M

$350.9 M

$209.1 M

$171.2 M

$166.7 M

$151.2 M

Houston

Muscogee

Liberty

Richmond

Chatham

Camden

Cobb

Lowndes

Dougherty

Clayton

$1.5 B

$1.2 B

$1.1 B

$1.1 B

$425.2 M

$338.8 M

$318.7 M

$304.2 M

$162.9 M

$138.6 M

Fulton

Cobb Gwinnett

Chattahoochee

Richmond

Houston

Liberty

Glynn

Chatham

Camden

Clayton

Cobb

Richmond

Muscogee

Lowndes

Houston

Dougherty

Chatham

Camden

Liberty
EXHIBIT 99.1


                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Big Dog Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Andrew D. Feshbach, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge.

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
    respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


/s/ANDREW FESHBACH
----------------------
Andrew D. Feshbach
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 27, 2003
Exhibit 19
  
                           Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors
The CIT Group/Sales Financing, Inc.:

We have examined  management's  assertion about The CIT  Group/Sales  Financing,
Inc. (the Company),  a wholly owned subsidiary of The CIT Group Holdings,  Inc.,
compliance  with the minimum  servicing  standards  identified  in the  Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage
Bankers  (USAP) as of and for the year ended  December 31, 1996  included in the
accompanying  management assertion.  Management is responsible for the Company's
compliance with those minimum  servicing  standards.  Our  responsibility  is to
express an opinion on  management's  assertion  about the  Company's  compliance
based on our examination

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that the  Company  complied  with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December
31, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

Management's  assertion  herein  relates  to the  application  of these  minimum
servicing  standards as they apply to loans  serviced for others by the Company,
except for the GNMA Defaulted Manufactured Housing Master Subservicing contract.
Management has issued a separate  assertion on the  application of these minimum
servicing  standards as they relate to the GNMA Defaulted  Manufactured  Housing
Master  Subservicing  contract.  Such assertion states that the Company complied
with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards, except for certain items of
non-compliance relating solely to the GNMA Defaulted Manufactured Housing Master
Subservicing contract during a portion of the year ended December 31, 1996 which
primarily  related to a subservicer  and that the Company was in compliance with
all  minimum  servicing  standards  as of  December  31,  1996.  Our  opinion on
management's  assertion,  dated  March  12,  1997  related  to the USAP  minimum
servicing standards as applied to the GNMA Defaulted Manufactured Housing Master
Subservicing contract as of and for the year ended December 31, 1996 states that
their assertion is fairly stated, in all material respects.




                                          /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

March 12, 1997
#### Susan Bell, Also Known as Susan Smyth Bell, Individually and as Executor of Robert A. Bell, Also Known as Robert Bell, Deceased, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Appellants.

[801 NYS2d 3]

*300Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J), entered October 10, 2003, after a jury trial, awarding plaintiff, inter alia, a lump sum in the principal amounts of $370,290.73 in her individual capacity and $45,070.03 in her capacity as executor, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

When viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the evidence established a prima facie case of negligence. Defendants breached their duty of reasonable care by improperly maintaining and inspecting the rear doors of the bus, which closed quickly and violently on plaintiffs knee, causing her injury. The uncontradicted evidence established that plaintiff was holding the handle of the open door as she exited the bus, and as she was descending from the second step to the bottom step, the doors closed suddenly and with great force. Plaintiff’s expert testified that if the air-assist system were properly operating, the rear doors of the bus should stay open as long as someone is holding them, even with light pressure, and even when the pressure against them is removed, the doors should close slowly. The uncontradicted evidence here, however, indicates that such did not occur in this instance, and common experience confirms that air-assisted bus doors do not always operate properly. Taken as a whole, the court’s charge to the jury met the appropriate standard that defendants were required to use reasonable care under all circumstances in the maintenance of the bus *(see Bethel v New York City Tr. Auth.,*92 NY2d 348 [1998]). Concur— Ellerin, J.P., Nardelli, Williams, Gonzalez and Sweeny, JJ.
Order entered September 19, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 01050 - CV IN THE ESTATE OF RAF FAELE MARTINI PANDOZ Y On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dalla s County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. PR - 18 - 03717 - 1



### O RDER Before the Court is the September 18, 2019 request of Jackie Galindo, Official Court Reporter for Probate Court No. 1, for an extension of time to file the reporter’ s record. The reporter’s r ecor d is not due until October 7 , 2019. See T EX . R S . A PP . P. 35.1 ; 4.1(a)

. Accordingly, we DENY the motion as premature.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
54 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

LOUISIANA 

#30 #30 0.7% $927 #32 #22 #25

$4.3 B SPENT IN 1.7% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $2.6 B CONTRACT 37,958 NUMBER OF $1.7 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING PENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 27% Supplies and 

Equipment: 41% 

Research and

Development: 1%

Service: 32%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

4%

Other Defense

6%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 14%

National 

Guard: 30%

47%

43%

Active Duty: 38%

Civilian: 17%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

62%

Navy/Marines

12%

Air Force

26%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Textron $510.8 M

Manson Construction Co. $165.8 M

Gulf Island Fabrication Inc. $131.1 M

Hornbeck Offshore Services $86.7 M

Nova Global Supply & Services $72.4 M

Weeks Marine $64.7 M

Placid Refining Co. $62.7 M

Great Lakes Dredge & Dock $58.7 M

Primoris Services Corp. $55.1 M

Swiftships $50.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.6

$2.2 $2.1 $1.9

FY13 FY14

$1.9 $1.9

$1.6

FY15

$0.8

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

$1.7 BILLION 37,958

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Total

9,396

8,723

7,935

ND

1,451

ND

ND

ND

ND

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve

Vernon 7,857 1,405 108 26

Bossier 5,160 1,509 119 1,935

Orleans 1,074 1,779 2,501 2,581

Rapides ND 419 1,371 ND

East Baton Rouge 149 110 595 597

Tangipahoa ND 107 793 0

Iberville ND 40 770 ND

Plaquemines 87 640 0 ND

Lafayette 40 46 324 114

Calcasieu ND 45 320 152

524
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

LOUISIANA 

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions)

Orleans

Vernon

Plaquemines

Terrebonne

Jefferson

St. Tammany

St. Mary

Bossier

East Baton Rouge

West Baton Rouge

(M = millions)

$921.0 M 

$400.0 M 

$221.8 M 

$155.2 M 

$151.4 M 

$140.7 M 

$87.7 M 

$87.2 M 

$84.2 M 

$62.8 M 

Vernon

Bossier

Orleans

Rapides

Plaquemines

East Baton Rouge

Tangipahoa

Iberville

Lafayette

Calcasieu

$522.2 M 

$492.3 M 

$396.5 M 

$65.0 M 

$42.9 M 

$39.1 M 

$23.2 M 

$21.5 M 

$17.3 M 

$10.8 M 

Bossier

Bossier

Vernon

East Baton Rouge

St. Tammany

Orleans

St. Mary

Terrebonne Plaquemines

West Baton Rouge

Jefferson

Orleans

Plaquemines

East Baton Rouge

Vernon

Calcasieu Lafayette Iberville

Rapides

Tangipahoa

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

55
Supply Chains of 

Recovered Elements 

Consortium The Connecticut Defense 

Manufacturing Community 

Consortium

Illinois Defense 

Manufacturing 

Consortium

Rhode Island 

Manufacturing 

to Accelerate the 

Defense Ecosystem

Ohio Defense 

Manufacturing 

Community

New Jersey Defense 

Manufacturing Community The Artificial 

Intelligence in Metals 

and Manufacturing 

Consortium Virginia Maritime 

Industrial Base 

Consortium

California Advanced 

Defense Ecosystems & 

National Consortia Effort 

Utah Defense 

Manufacturing 

Community

South Kansas 

Defense Manufacturing 

Community

Southeastern 

Advanced Machine 

Tools Network

North Carolina 

Defense Manufacturing 

Community The Texas Defense 

Aerospace Manufacturing 

Community 

Alabama Defense 

Advanced Manufacturing 

Community

Microelectronics 

Precision Rapid 

Innovation & Scaling 

Manufacturing Network Mississippi-Shipbuilding 

Industry Preparedness for 

National Security

FY 2022

FY 2021

FY 2020

Aerospace & Composites

Aerospace Defense

Artificial Intelligence

Castings and Forgings,

Energy Storage

Critical Minerals

Machine Tooling

Microelectronics, 

Space, 5G

Missiles and Munitions, 

Castings and Forgings, 

Microelectronics 

Parts/Assemblies

Shipbuilding

Submarines, Vertical Lift

Vehicles, Aviation & Missiles

Weapon Prototyping

Wearable Textiles

For more information on the Defense 

Manufacturing Communities Support Program, 

visit https://oldcc.gov/defense-manufacturingcommunity-support-program or scan the 

QR code below.
FY 2020

PA/WV/OH. Artificial Intelligence

OH. Parts/Assemblies

UT. Aerospace & Composites

CA. Microelectronics, Space, 5G

AL. Vehicles, Aviation & Missiles

CT. Submarines, Vertical Lift

FY 2021

VA. Shipbuilding

NC. Wearable Textiles

TX. Aerospace Defense

TN. Machine Tooling

KS. Weapon Prototyping

FY 2022

IL. Castings and Forgings, Energy Storage

RI. Shipbuilding

NJ. Missiles and Munitions, Castings 

and Forgings, Microelectronic

MI, OH, PA, WI, WV. Critical Minerals

TX. Microelectronics

MS. Shipbuilding
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The followingcertification accompanies the issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB,for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007, and is not filed, asprovided in Release 33-8212, 34-47551.

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Treaty Oak Bancorp, Inc. (“Treaty Oak”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jeffrey L. Nash, President and Chief Executive Officer of Treaty Oak, herebycertify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Treaty Oak.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Treaty Oakand will be retained by Treaty Oak and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated:  February 14, 2008 |                                   |
|--------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                           |                                   |
|                           |                                   |
|                           | /s/ Jeffrey L. Nash                    |   |
|                           | Jeffrey L. Nash                        |
|                           | President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul B. Carousso, Vice President, Finance of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Paul B. Carousso         
|                        |  | Paul B. Carousso             
|                        |  | Vice President, Finance      
|                        |  | (principal financial officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5026 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5026

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Uniconazole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2008

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Uniconazole.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNICONAZOLE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.24 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 27, 2009

p0120 

# Order

January 27, 2009

137654

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 137654 COA: 277852 Monroe CC: 06-035638-FH IRA STEPHEN MCCOY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 16, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
# L_2016278EN.01004401.xml

| 14.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 278/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 278/44

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2016/1816

of 7 October 2016

appointing a member, proposed by the Kingdom of the Netherlands of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Dutch Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. On 18 September 2015, by Council Decision (EU) 2015/1573 (4), Mr R.E. (Ralph) DE VRIES was replaced by Mr J.A. (John) JORRITSMA as a member. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. On 18 September 2015, by Council Decision (EU) 2015/1573 (4), Mr R.E. (Ralph) DE VRIES was replaced by Mr J.A. (John) JORRITSMA as a member.

| (2) | A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr J.A. (John) JORRITSMA, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr J.A. (John) JORRITSMA,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed as a member of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Mr K. (Klaas) KIELSTRA, Gedeputeerde in de provincie Fryslân. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr K. (Klaas) KIELSTRA, Gedeputeerde in de provincie Fryslân.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 7 October 2016.

For the Council

The President

M. LAJČÁK

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

(4)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/1573 of 18 September 2015 appointing four Dutch members and five Dutch alternate members of the Committee of the Regions (OJ L 245, 22.9.2015, p. 10).

4

---