alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-06-0344-CR IN THE COUR

T OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVEN TH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL A SEPTEMBER 29, 2006

______________________________ TIMOTHY DARON GRAVES, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A PPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE 4 6TH DIST RICT COURT OF HARDEMAN COUNTY; NO. 3961; HON ORABLE TOM NEELY, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION Appellant

Timothy Dar

on Graves per

fected this appeal to challenge h is convi ction for burglary of a habitation. Pending before t his Court i s a motion to dis miss filed purs uant to Rule 42.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Proc edure by w hich appellant asserts the t rial2

court granted his

motion for new tri al. Attached tothe motion is a copy of the trial court’s order granting the motion for new trial. We cannot

gran t the mo tion to dismiss under Rule 42.2(a)

because it is

not personally signed by

appellant. We will, however , treat the moti on as a motion to dismiss for want of jur isdiction. The le gal effect of grant ing a motion for new tri al restoresthe case to its positi o n before the former tri al. Tex. R . App. P. 21.9. There bei ng no convicti on to be appealed, we have no jur isdiction to consider thi s appeal. See Waller v. State, 931 S.W.2d 640, 643- 44 (Tex.App.–Dallas 1996, n o pet.). Accordingl y, we dismiss thi s appeal for w ant of jurisdic tion. Don H. Reavis Justice Do not publish .
STATE v. GARNER

No. COA05-707

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 7, 2006

Certification Date February 27, 2006

Appeal from Halifax (04CRS51185, 04CRS52092).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ERIC GIAMBAGNO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1627

[October 14, 2021]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Caroline Cahill Shepherd, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2018-

CF-001666-AXXX-MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender and David John McPherrin, 

Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5252 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Direct Black 22. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. WATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Direct Black 

22. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DIRECT BLACK 22. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.25 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Direct Black 22) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5252 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A.
Shewer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kenmar Global Trust for the period January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Registrant.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                                                                                                  
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer
|Name:                 |  | Kenneth A. Shewer                                                                                                                
|Title:                |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Kenmar Preferred Investments Corp. Managing Owner of Kenmar Global Trust
|                     
|                     
|                     
|                     
|                      | 
|Date:                 |  | March 25, 2010
Exhibit 10.1

**Amendment**

 

The Management Continuity Agreement, dated March 28, 2003, between Citizens Bank and Trust Company and Joseph D. Borgerding is hereby amended as follows:

 
|   | **•** | The Salary Continuance Benefit, Page 5, Item (ii) is amended from “...*an amount equal to one-half times the Executive’s Final Compensation*” to “...*an amount equal to one times the Executive’s Final Compensation.”* |
|--------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

This Amendment was approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors in its April 26, 2006, meeting and is effective as of that date.

 

In Witness Whereof, this Amendment has been executed by Citizens Bank and Trust Company by its duly authorized officer and by the Executive, as of April 26, 2006.

 

Citizens Bank and Trust Company

 

BY /s/ Lynn K. Shekleton
|   | Lynn K. Shekleton, Senior Vice President |
|--------|------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Joseph D. Borgerding  
|   | Joseph D. Borgerding |
|--------|----------------------|
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1


                             IXL ENTERPRISES, INC.
                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF NET LOSS PER SHARE
              FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997, 1998 AND 1999
                  (IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT FOR PER SHARE AMOUNTS)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                 -------------------------------
                                                           1997               1998               1999
                                                           ----               ----               ----


<S>                                                    <C>                <C>                <C>
Net loss                                               $  (15,440)        $  (48,866)        $  (70,213)
                                                       ================================================
Dividends and accretion on mandatorily redeemable
  preferred stock                                              --             (9,099)           (20,966)

                                                       ------------------------------------------------
Net loss available to common stockholders              $  (15,440)        $  (57,965)        $  (91,179)
                                                       ================================================

Weighted average common shares outstanding                  6,540             11,777             43,747


Basic and diluted net loss per share                   $    (2.36)        $    (4.92)        $    (2.08)
                                                       ================================================

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1













CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Scientific Energy, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley Chan, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  May 17, 2019







|                                                              |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Stanley Chan                                              |  | 
|Stanley Chan                                                  |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer           |  | 
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |  |
80 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

NEW YORK

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

By Type

Service: 21%

Construction: 5%

Research and 

Development: 7%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 67%

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions B=billions)

Lockheed Martin $1.3 B

Northrop Grumman $1.1 B

Harris $706.3 M

Bechtel Group $269.8 M

Interpublic Group of Companies $222.7 M

BAE Systems $158.0 M

Boeing $143.5 M

Raytheon $105.0 M

Saint Vincent's Catholic Medical Centers of NY $99.5 M

Moog $91.1 M

$7.9

$9.1

$8.1 $7.6 $7.7 $7.8

$6.8 $7.2

23%

45%

13%

19%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

66,379

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

 Military

Jefferson 23,094 20,396 2,366

Orange 7,421 2,657 2,918

Saratoga 2,903 2,829 73

Oneida 2,716 77 1,895

Queens 2,630 94 113

Onondaga 2,566 188 624

Niagara 2,464 21 587

Nassau 2,326 548 335

Albany 2,284 307 1,241

Kings 2,180 303 418

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 37%

Active Duty: 44%

Civilian: 19%

71%

10%

16%

3%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 81

New York

Niagara 

Saratoga 

Orange 

Oneida

Kings Nassau

Onondaga

New York

Monroe

Erie Schenectady 

Tioga

Nassau Suffolk

Onondaga

Jefferson County

$903.4 M

Orange County

$368.7 M

Oneida County 

$127.5 M

Saratoga County

$124.9 M

Albany County

$110.1 M

Nassau County

$68.5 M

Kings County

$61.0 M

Onondaga County

$58.5 M

Niagara County

$52.8 M

New York County

$52.7 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions) (M=millions)

Nassau County

$1.5 B

Tioga County

$1.0 B

Monroe County

$743.0 M

Suffolk County

$725.8 M

Onondaga County

$638.9 M

New York County

$552.5 M

Erie County

$288.9 M

Orange County

$255.3 M

Schenectady County

$176.1 M

Jefferson County

$110.1 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions)

#14

$9.0 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#49

0.6% OF STATE GDP

2.4%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$458

PER RESIDENT

#13

6.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#15

66,379 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#17

$2.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 NEW YORK

Jefferson

Albany 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active

Orange 

Jefferson
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. AP -76,886

EX P ARTE LES LIE MEGAN LEWIS-GRA NT, Appl icant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. F CM- 07-19103 IN THE 52nd DISTRICT COURT

F ROM CORYELL COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s co n v i cted of murder and sentenc ed to life imprisonment. The Four teenth Court of Appea ls a ffirme d her conviction. LewisGrant v. State , 14-0 9 -00069-CR (Tex. App.–Houston[14th Dist.] , delivere d August 31, 2010, no pet.). Applicant contends that h e r a p p e ll a te c o u n s e l r e n d e r e d in e f

f e ctive assistance beca

use counsel mistakenly

filed his motion for rehe aringunder the wrongcause number, thus ca using he r to miss the per tinent deadline f

or filinga timely

petition for discre tionary revie w in this case.2

Appellate counsel filed this application on behalf of Ap p l i ca n t , and conce des that it was throug h counsel’s oversight rathe r than throug h any fault of Applicant’s that no petition was timely filed. Fur thermore , counsel states that he intended to file a petition for discretionar y revie w in this
case and that Applicant desired he file a petition. There fore , based upon the rec ord befor e this Court, we grant re lief. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition fo r di scre tionary revie w of the j udg ment of t he Fourtee nth Court of Appeals in Cause No
. 1 4 -0 9

- 00069-CR that aff

irmed her conviction in Cause No. FCM-07-19103 from the 52nd District Court of Cory ell County
. Applicant shall file her petition for discretionar y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 3, 2012 Do not publish
STATE v. NGUYEN

No. COA03-1502.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Mitchell (03CRS169, 03CRS50064).

Case reported without published opinion. No error at trial; remanded for resentencing.
MISSOURI 

#11 #13 2.5% $2,437 #10 #20 #27

$15.0 B SPENT IN 4.5% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $13.3 B CONTRACT 44,801 NUMBER OF $1.7 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 4% Development: 5%

Supplies and

Equipment: 74%

By Service 

Army

12%

Navy/Marines

Air Force

23%

Other Defense

14%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 17%

6%

Civilian: 18%

Active 

National

Guard: 2

Allocations, By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

20%

Other Defense

2%

Service: 17%

52%

Duty: 39%

71%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions)

Boeing $9.7 B

Express Scripts $678.9 M

World Wide Technology $305.6 M

Melrose Industries $279.7 M

Olin Winchester $236.4 M

McCarthy Hitt - Next NGA West, JV $203.3 M

Leonardo SpA $184.3 M

Scanna Msc Inc. $93.7 M

Weston Solutions Holdings $60.7 M

EaglePicher Technologies LLC $59.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$13.3 $12.3

$9.6 $8.3

FY13

$7.5

FY14 FY15 FY16

$7.5 $6.9 $6.1

FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

$1.7 BILLION 44,801

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Pulaski 12,419 3,033 284

Johnson 3,922 1,102 1,096

Jackson 96 864 921

St. Louis 62 577 1,567

Greene 19 267 1,089

St. Louis City 236 789 0

Buchanan 15 282 1,271

Cole 26 354 867

St. Charles ND 90 0

Cass 0 25 116

Reserve Total

394 16,130

982 7,102

1,749 3,630

1,176 3,382

700 2,075

708 1,733

64 1,632

135 1,382

880 ND

422 563

68 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MISSOURI 

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CO (M = millions, B = billions)

St. Louis

Jackson

St. Louis City

Pulaski

Johnson

St. Charles

Atchison

Jasper

Clay

Jefferson

(M = millions)

$11.4 B

$427.9 M

$349.8 M

$348.3 M 

$128.9 M

$125.9 M

$94.4 M

$84.5 M

$69.2 M

$45.5 M

Pulaski

Johnson

Jackson

St. Louis City

St. Louis

Cole

Buchanan

Greene

St. Charles

Boone

$608.4 M

$330.6 M

$134.9 M

$104.6 M

$104.2 M

$66.6 M 

$59.3 M

$47.1 M

$26.9 M

$13.1 M

Clay

Jackson

Johnson

Jasper

Atchison

St. Louis

St. Louis City

Jefferson

Pulaski

St. Charles

Jackson

Johnson

Buchanan

Greene

St. Louis

St. Louis City

Pulaski

Boone St. Charles

Cole

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020 69

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
----

|   | (a) | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods presented in the Form 10-Q. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/Joseph D. Borgerding  |         Date: May 14, 2010 |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Joseph D. Borgerding          |                                                                    |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |                                                                    |
|   |   |                          |                                                                    |

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Apple REIT Six, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company as of June 30, 2007, and for the period then ended.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/S/ GLADE M. KNIGHT    
|Glade M. Knight        
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|August 3, 2007         
|                       
|/S/ BRYAN PEERY        
|Bryan Peery            
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|August 3, 2007
Exhibit 32 (a)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of MSW Energy Holdings II LLC, (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, John T. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael J.
Gruppuso, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ John T. Miller                          /s/ Michael J. Gruppuso
---------------------------------           ------------------------------------
John T. Miller                              Michael J. Gruppuso
Chief Executive Officer                     Chief Financial Officer
May 3, 2005                                 May 3, 2005
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5240 

To restore equitable sharing with affected States of revenues from onshore 

Federal mineral leases. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2008 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself and Mr. SALAZAR) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To restore equitable sharing with affected States of revenues 

from onshore Federal mineral leases. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equitable Mineral 

5 Lease Revenue Sharing Restoration Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO DEDUCT FROM 

7 AMOUNT OTHERWISE PAYABLE TO EACH 

8 STATE. 

9 Title I of the Department of the Interior, Environ10 ment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2008 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5240 IH

1 (Division F of Public Law 110–161) is amended under 

2 the heading ‘‘Minerals Management Service’’, under the 

3 heading ‘‘administrative provisions’’, by repealing the sec4 ond undesignated paragraph. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS