alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOcean MediaPodcasts

# SoundScapes

## Making Waves: Episode 121

In this episode: in less than three minutes, this video presents the basics about multibeam and side scan sonar, including a visualization that shows how sonar data is used to make products like nautical charts. 

### Transcript

(Sound of a submarine 'ping') 

NARRATOR: You probably know this sound from the movies. It's a submarine sonar 'ping.'  Sonar is used to 'see' what lies beneath the waves.  Today's high-tech sonar systems used by NOAA send out rapid sound pulses that bounce off the sea floor and back  to scan what's below. These soundings produce amazingly detailed pictures of the unseen sea floor. Multibeam echo sounders, shown here, measure the depth of the sea floor. Hydrographers use the multibeam soundings to create nautical charts and produce colorful maps of the underwater terrain. In general, red is used to show shallow depths and blue or purple for deeper depths.  Sidescan sonar, the device trailing the ship shown here, captures black and white imagery that helps to identify submerged wrecks and obstructions. Here's a visualization created by a NOAA hydrographer that's beautiful to watch and will give you a good idea of how hydrographers use sophisticated computer programs to transform sonar imagery into nautical charts and other products that help keep mariners safe at sea. 

CREDITS: 

            - Visualization created by Ian Colvert, NOAA Coast Survey Navigation Response Branch
            - Sidescan sonar animation courtesy of the U.S. Navy

From corals to coastal science, catch the current of the ocean with our audio and video podcast, **Making Waves**. 

Subscribe to Feed | Subscribe in iTunes

###### **Search** Our Podcasts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - ** Download this episode
          - What is sonar?
          - Multibeam Sonar 
          - Side Scan Sonar 
          - Surveys and Wrecks,  Office of Coast Survey 
          -  Understanding Ocean Acoustics ,  NOAA Ocean Explorer
          - Sound in the Sea Gallery ,  NOAA Ocean Explorer
          - Acoustic Monitoring ,  NOAA Vents Program
          - Sonar, NOAA Ocean Explorer 

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
| ·   | fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   /s/ G. Hunter Haas                                                 |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | G. Hunter Haas, IV                                                        |
|   | President, Chief Investment Officer,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|   |                                                                      |
|   | November 4, 2010                                                          |
STATE of North Carolina v. Nathan Owen CHANCE.

No. 35P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Nathan Owen Chance, Pro Se.

Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 14th day of January 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 14th day of January 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."
STATE of North Carolina v. Coley Terrance HOLMAN.

No. 183P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Coley Terrance Holman, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Robert F. Johnson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 4th day of April 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The followingcertification accompanies the issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB,for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007, and is not filed, asprovided in Release 33-8212, 34-47551.

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Treaty Oak Bancorp, Inc. (“Treaty Oak”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Jeffrey L. Nash, Chief Financial Officer of Treaty Oak, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)           theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Treaty Oak.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Treaty Oakand will be retained by Treaty Oak and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: February 14,  2008 |                    |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                           |                    |
|                           |                    |
|                           | /s/ Coralie S. Pledger  |   |
|                           | Coralie S. Pledger      |
|                           | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
COOKE v. COOKE.

No. COA04-414.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Haywood, (02CVS287).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. Lavoris Monteiz BATTLE.

No. 422P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 11, 2005.

Barbara S. Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Lavoris Monteiz Battle.

Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of August 2005 by Attorney General for Temporary Stay:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 11th day of August 2005."
56 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MAINE 

#35

$3.2 B SPENT IN 

#10

4.1% OF STATE GDP

0.6%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$2,348

PER RESIDENT 

#30 

$2.4 B CONTRACT 

#43

12,696 NUMBER OF 

#37 

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 7% Research and

Development: 1% 

Supplies and Service: 38%

Equipment: 54%

By Service 

Army

2%

Navy/Marines

63%

Air Force

12%

Other Defense

23%

Top Defense Contractors 

General Dynamics

Martin’s Point Health Care

Puritan Medical Products

Elscott Manufacturing LLC

Cianbro Cos.

381 Constructors

Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.

American Rheinmetall Systems LLC

Spirit Aerosystems Holdings

Benaka, Inc.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.1 B

$392.3 M

$267.5 M

$104.9 M

$75.7 M

$70.0 M

$67.3 M

$20.0 M

$17.9 M

$16.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$3.2

FY19

$2.6 $2.7

FY17

$2.4

$1.7 $1.3 $1.4

FY16

$1.2

FY14 FY15 FY18 FY20 FY21

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 5% Active Duty: 2%

National 

Guard: 23%

Civilian: 70%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

21%

Navy/Marines

63%

Air Force

10%

Other Defense

6%

$842.8 MILLION 12,696

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active

Duty

Civilian National

Guard

Reserve Total

York ND 7,252 62 176 ND 

Penobscot ND 369 1,497 124 ND 

Kennebec ND 191 641 ND ND 

Aroostook 0 583 102 0 685

Cumberland 40 76 371 126 613

Sagadahoc 83 334 0 0 417 

Androscoggin ND 19 88 206 ND 

Washington ND 77 34 0 ND 

Oxford 0 0 96 0 96

Somerset 12 ND 54 0 ND 
FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MAINE

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Sagadahoc

York

Cumberland

Piscataquis

Hancock

Penobscot

Washington

Kennebec

Aroostook

Oxford

(M = millions)

$1.0 B

$449.2 M

$418.9 M

$267.5 M

$111.4 M

$27.1 M

$22.5 M

$12.9 M

$12.7 M

$3.1 M

York

Penobscot

Sagadahoc

Kennebec

Aroostook

Cumberland

Androscoggin

Washington

Hancock

Oxford

$611.3 M

$73.2 M

$42.6 M

$35.9 M

$33.3 M 

$22.9 M

$8.7 M 

$6.2 M

$2.4 M

$1.9 M

Oxford

Penobscot Piscataquis

Washington

York

Kennebec

Sagadahoc

Cumberland

Hancock

Penobscot

Oxford

Androscoggin

York

Kennebec

Sagadahoc

Cumberland

Hancock

Washington

Aroostook

Aroostook

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 5

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

7
HOLZWORTH v. NATIONWIDE MUT. FIRE INS. CO..

No. COA04-1062.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Gaston (02CVS1224)

Case reported without published opinion Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Lorenzo MANLEY.

No. 347P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Lorenzo Manley, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 21st day of October 2004 for rehearing on petitioner's writ of certiorari for discretionary review on trial court and N.C. Court of Appeals decision on motion for new trial and motion to dismiss, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."
STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. COA03-1452

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed December 21, 2004

Certification Date January 10, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 32.4

QUADRAMED CORPORATION

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of QuadraMed Corporation for the period ended December 31, 2005, I, David L. Piazza, Chief
Financial Officer of QuadraMed Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my best knowledge:



|3. | This Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | The information contained in this Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of QuadraMed Corporation.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |                                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  | 
|Date: August 17, 2006 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ David L. Piazza                    
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | David L. Piazza Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Jay D. Nielsen, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company,LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting. 

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Jay D. Nielsen                      |
|     |  | Jay D. Nielsen*Chief Financial Officer* |

Date: April 12, 2005
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 10580 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Alonso Perez, Jr.,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20

- CR

- 32

- 6

**______________________________** Before **Stewart, Duncan,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges. **Per Curiam :**  ***** The attorney appointed to represent Alonso Perez, Jr., has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel evant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 9, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-10580 Document: 00516671127 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2023No. 22

- 10580

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further respo nsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 22-10580 Document: 00516671127 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2023
STATE of North Carolina v. Robert Allen SARTORI.

No. 604P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Robert Allen Sartori, Pro Se.

Daniel P. O'Brien, Assistant Attorney General, Charles W. Hipps, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th day of November 2003 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the Order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
**Exhibit        32.1**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Registrants. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                               |         |   |   |                                                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                  November 14, 2007           |    | BY:    |   | /s/                  WILLIAM S. MORRIS IV                                                           |
|                                               |    |   |   | **William                  S. Morris IV**Chief                  Executive Officer    |
|                                               |         |   |
| Date: November                  14, 2007 |    | BY:    |   | /s/                  STEVE K. STONE                                                                 |
|                                               |    |   |   | **Steve                  K. Stone**Chief                  Financial                  Officer        |
# Official Journal C 3/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2423
  doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.003.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 3 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 546 January 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2423

doi:10.3000/17252423.C_2011.003.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 3

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 546 January 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 003/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6056 — DnB NOR Bank/Bank DnB NORD) (1) | 1 |
| 2011/C 003/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6043 — Mubadala/UTC/Lockheed Martin/Ammroc) (1) | 1 |
| 2011/C 003/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6026 — CRH/Bauking) (1) | 2 |
| 2011/C 003/04 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5930 — JCI/Michel Thierry Group) (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 003/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6056 — DnB NOR Bank/Bank DnB NORD) (1)

1

2011/C 003/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6043 — Mubadala/UTC/Lockheed Martin/Ammroc) (1)

1

2011/C 003/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6026 — CRH/Bauking) (1)

2

2011/C 003/04

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5930 — JCI/Michel Thierry Group) (1)

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 003/05 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2011/C 003/06 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 003/05

Euro exchange rates

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2011/C 003/06

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COM'N v. COWEE MOUNTAIN IMP. ASS'N, INC.

No. COA04-996.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Dismissed.