alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5111 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5111

   To grant to a State with an unemployment rate that is equal to or 
greater than 125 percent of the national unemployment rate authority to 
    use Federal funds made available to such State for job training 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2008

 Mr. Hoekstra introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
 Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To grant to a State with an unemployment rate that is equal to or 
greater than 125 percent of the national unemployment rate authority to 
    use Federal funds made available to such State for job training 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Maximizing the Use of Federal Funds 
for Job Training Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO CONSOLIDATE OR TRANSFER CERTAIN FUNDS.

    (a) Authority Available.--A State with an unemployment rate that is 
equal to or greater than 125 percent of the national unemployment rate 
is authorized to consolidate or transfer, without limitation, any funds 
made available to such State under the programs described in subsection 
(b).
    (b) Designated Programs.--Subsection (a) applies to--
            (1) any formula grant program carried out under the 
        Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.); and
            (2) any funds made available to the State under part II of 
        subchapter B of chapter 2 of title II of the Trade Act of 1974 
        (19 U.S.C. 2295 et seq.).
    (c) Duration.--The authority provided by subsection (a) shall 
remain in effect for a period of 2 years for a State or until the date 
on the State's unemployment rate is less than 125 percent of the 
national unemployment rate, whichever occurs later.
    (d) National Employment Rate Defined.--In this section, the term 
``national employment rate'' means the most recent rate of unemployment 
announced each month by Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department of 
Labor based upon data from the current populations survey of households 
conducted for the Bureau by the Bureau of the Census of the Department 
of Commerce.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 27, 2022

NO. 03

- 22

- 00281

- CV

Wesley Perkins , Appellant

v.

Southside Wrecker, Inc. , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN , BA KER, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order signed by the t r i a l court on May 17, 2022

. Having reviewed

the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

. Therefore, the C ourt

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. A ppellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal,

both in this Court and in the court below.
46 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

IOWA

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$183.7 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

11,968

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

 Military

Polk 4,208 147 860

Woodbury 1,347 ND 325

Linn 710 ND 103

Scott 644 ND 165

Black Hawk 579 31 79

Johnson 475 55 33

Boone 453 ND 58

Dubuque 281 ND 37

Pottawattamie 259 ND 14

Des Moines 254 ND 38

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 82%

Active Duty: 2%

79%

3%

18%

0%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Civilian: 16%

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions) 

Rockwell Collins $779.8 M

Northrop Grumman $405.7 M

Data Link Solutions $173.7 M

American Ordnance $63.5 M

Cobham $38.5 M

Assurance Technology $30.3 M

Boeing $20.4 M

HNI Corporation $15.5 M

Collins-McCarthy 8A, JV $10.4 M

NewLink Genetics $9.0 M

14%

34%

43%

9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Service: 17%

Research and 

Development: 5%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 77%

Construction: 1%

$1.0

$1.3 $1.3 $1.2 $1.1 $1.1

$1.7

$1.2

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 47

Des Moines

Scott Polk 

Linn 

Black Hawk 

Story 

Webster 

Woodbury

Des Moines

Muscatine

Scott Polk 

Lucas 

Linn 

Dubuque 

Story 

Sioux 

Polk County

$81.6 M

Woodbury County

$25.1 M

Scott County 

$13.0 M

Linn County

$9.6 M

Black Hawk County

$8.1 M

Johnson County

$7.0 M

Boone County

$6.9 M

Des Moines County

$4.0 M

Webster County

$3.6 M

Story County

$2.9 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Linn County

$1.4 B

Scott County

$70.7 M

Des Moines County

$69.8 M

Polk County

$33.1 M

Muscatine County

$28.1 M

Sioux County

$13.6 M

Story County

$12.6 M

Woodbury County

$7.7 M

Lucas County

$7.7 M

Dubuque County

$6.7 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions)

#39

$1.9 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#37

1.0% OF STATE GDP

0.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$595

PER RESIDENT

#32

$1.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#43

11,968 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#49

$0.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 IOWA

Woodbury Boone 

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active
exv10w1



 




Exhibit 10.1


CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN REDACTED AND

FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION




FIRST BANK OF DELAWARE

1000 Rocky Run Parkway

Wilmington, Delaware 19803-1455




June 14, 2005




Dollar Financial Group, Inc.

1436 Lancaster Avenue — Suite 310

Berwyn, Pennsylvania 19312-1288



          Re: Amendment of Marketing and Servicing Agreement



     Reference is made hereby to the Marketing and Servicing Agreement between us dated October 18,
2002 (the “Agreement”). As used herein, unless the context otherwise requires, all capitalized
terms have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.



     Exhibit “A” and any amendments thereto is hereby replaced in its entirety with the attached
new Exhibit “A.”



     Section 4(h) of the Agreement is amended by deleting “[**]” in each place where it occurs and
inserting “[**]”in lieu thereof. Commencing six months from the date of this letter, Lender will
semiannually reevaluate the amount of [**] required under Section 4(h) and adjust it based on Loans
outstanding and services provided by Servicer.



     Servicer will purchase all borrower forbearance agreements entered into by Lender [**]. The purchase price
of such agreements will be paid by Servicer to Lender through the daily settlement process.



     Dollar and its affiliates may issue a press release with respect hereto and may disclose this
Amendment to the extent required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



     Except as amended hereby, the Agreement is unmodified and shall remain in full force and
effect.


	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,





FIRST BANK OF DELAWARE

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Alonzo Primus
 	 
	 	 	Alonzo Primus 	 
	 	 	Executive Vice President 	 
	 




Accepted and agreed to this 14th day of

June, 2005:


	 	 	 	 
	DOLLAR FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

 	 
	By:  	 	/s/ D.F. Gayhardt
 	 
	 	 	Donald F. Gayhardt 
	 	 	President 	 
	 



** Confidential material which has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




 









 







Exhibit “A”




(As Revised June 14, 2005)




Pricing




Finance Charge to Borrowers





     BANK intends to charge each Borrower a Finance Charge equal to the following dollar
amounts per $100 of principal advanced, based on the residence of the Borrower:



     [**]



Fees




     The Fees shall be, in respect of each $100 of principal advanced:



     [**]



Deductions




     [**]



Target Loss Rate




     The Target Loss Rate is:



     [**]



     (Reference in this exhibit to particular [**] shall not be deemed to constitute an
acknowledgement by BANK that the conditions set forth in the Agreement to the conduct by
DOLLAR of marketing and servicing activities in such [**] have been satisfied.)


 


 

** Confidential material which has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
# L_2016275EN.01000101.xml

| 12.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 275/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 275/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1798

of 30 September 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (ข้าวสังข์หยดเมืองพัทลุง (Khao Sangyod Muang Phatthalung) (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Thailand's application to register the name ‘ข้าวสังข์หยดเมืองพัทลุง’ (Khao Sangyod Muang Phatthalung) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Thailand's application to register the name ‘ข้าวสังข์หยดเมืองพัทลุง’ (Khao Sangyod Muang Phatthalung) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘ข้าวสังข์หยดเมืองพัทลุง’ (Khao Sangyod Muang Phatthalung) should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘ข้าวสังข์หยดเมืองพัทลุง’ (Khao Sangyod Muang Phatthalung) should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘ข้าวสังข์หยดเมืองพัทลุง’ (Khao Sangyod Muang Phatthalung) (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 188, 27.5.2016, p. 50.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-26-1998
<CASH>                                       3,554,875
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,182,536
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    939,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,427,680
<PP&E>                                      78,270,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,371,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,687,091
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,291,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       279,162
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,874,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,687,091
<SALES>                                     37,579,044
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            37,684,203
<CGS>                                       30,485,725
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,201,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               175,590
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             718,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,940,067
<INCOME-TAX>                                    81,156
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,858,911
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,858,911
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
        

</TABLE>
GIBBS v. COBB

No. COA04-464

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 3, 2005.

Certification Date May 23, 2005.

Appeal from the Wake (02CVS11389).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Frederic H. Moll, M.D., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hansen Medical, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   May 14, 2007     /s/ Frederic H. Moll, M.D   Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)
STATE v. McKINNEY

No. COA04-14.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 20, 2005.

Certification Date October 10, 2005.

Appeal from Wayne (01CRS57630, 01CRS57631).

Case reported without published opinion. Remanded for resentencing.
STATE v. Jason Wayne HURST.

No. 363A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2005.

William N. Farrell, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of June 2005 by Defendant to amend record on appeal:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 24th day of June 2005."
58 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

 

 


	

FISCAL YEAR 2016 

MASSACHUSETTS

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type Top Defense Contractors (M=millions B=billions) 

Raytheon $3.0 B 

General Dynamics $1.2 B 

General Electric $967.2 M 

Charles Stark Draper Laboratory $338.5 M 

Massachusetts Institute of Technology $314.9 M 

MITRE $300.5 M 

Northrop Grumman $178.7 M 

Brighton Marine Health Center $141.4 M 

Textron $139.5 M 

L-3 Communications $128.8 M By Service 

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions) 

Supplies and Construction: 1% 

Equipment: 63% Research and 

Service: 20% 

Development: 16% 

34% 

32% 

18% 

16% 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

Air Force 

Other Defense 

09 10 11 12 14 16 13 15

$12.7 

$11.7 

$8.7 

$11.0 $11.3 $11.1 

$8.4 

$6.2 

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type $812.2 MILLION 22,824 

Active Duty: 12% TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Civilian: 33% 

Top Defense Personnel Locations 

County Total* Active Duty Civilians 

Military 

Middlesex 9,734 1,528 4,695 

Hampden 5,045 250 1,287 

Barnstable 2,090 116 550 

Suffolk 1,495 507 519 

Worcester 1,007 42 113 

Bristol 824 ND 85 

Plymouth 823 54 57 

Essex 569 17 193 

Norfolk 539 28 24 

Hampshire 258 73 25 

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units. 

National Guard/ 

Reserve: 55% 

Allocations, By Service 

52% 

8% 

37% 

3% 

Army 

Navy/Marines 

Air Force 

Other Defense 
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 59

Middlesex

Berkshire

Plymouth

Essex

Bristol

Norfolk

Worcester

Hampden 

Suffolk

Middlesex

Berkshire

Plymouth

Essex

Bristol

Norfolk

Hampshire Worcester

Suffolk

Middlesex County

$492.6 M

Hampden County

$119.9 M

Suffolk County 

$71.9 M

Barnstable County

$48.2 M

Essex County

$18.0 M

Worcester County

$11.6 M

Bristol County

$10.6 M

Plymouth County

$10.1 M

Norfolk County

$7.2 M

Berkshire County

$6.9 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions) (M=millions)

Middlesex County

$3.8 B

 Essex County

$2.3 B

Bristol County

$958.5 M

Suffolk County

$336.2 M

Norfolk County

$332.5 M

Berkshire County

$299.5 M

Plymouth County

$218.7 M

Worcester County

$123.0 M

Hampshire County

$86.2 M

Barnstable County

$75.2 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions)

#11

$9.5 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#24

1.8% OF STATE GDP

2.5%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$1,399

PER RESIDENT

#8

$8.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#33

22,824 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#31

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 MASSACHUSETTS

Barnstable

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active

Barnstable
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Rachel Marshall, CFO, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mountain Valley Bancshares, Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: August 14, 2007              /s/ Rachel Marshall   Rachel Marshall   Chief Financial Officer