Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40507 

1See Glycine from India and Japan: Amended 

Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination 

and Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 29170 (June 

21, 2019) (Order). 2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 86 FR 

41821, 41823 (August 3, 2021). 3See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India: 

Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated 

February 16, 2022. 4See Memorandum, ‘‘Glycine from India: 

Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

5See GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc.’s Letter, 

‘‘Partial Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated November 1, 2021. 

6Rudraa International is one of the companies for 

which the review request was withdrawn. Id. In the 

last completed administrative review, Commerce 

collapsed Kumar Industries and Rudraa 

International. See Glycine from India: Final Results 

Continued 

Company 

Subsidy 

rate 

(percent) 

Baosteel Desheng Stainless Steel Co., 

Ltd.

Baosteel Co., Ltd.

Bayi Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.

Ningbo Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.

Shaoguan Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.

Guangdong Shaoguan Iron & Steel Co., 

Ltd.

Zhanjiang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.

Daming International Import Export Co 

Ltd.

Tianjin Taigang Daming Metal Product 

Co., Ltd.

All Others ................................................ 75.60 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an APO of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing the 

final results and this notice in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). 

Dated: June 29, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. History of the Order 

V. Legal Framework 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

1. Likelihood of Continuation or 

Recurrence of a Countervailable Subsidy 

2. Net Countervailable Subsidy Rates 

Likely to Prevail 

3. Nature of the Subsidies 

VII. Final Results of Sunset Review 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–14421 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–883] 

Glycine From India: Preliminary 

Results and Rescission, in Part, of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that producers and/or exporters 

subject to this administrative review 

made sales of subject merchandise at 

less than normal value during the 

period of review June 1, 2020, through 

May 31, 2021. We invite interested 

parties to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Emily Bradshaw or Yang Jin Chun, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–3896 or (202) 482–5760, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Background 

On June 21, 2019, Commerce 

published the antidumping duty order 

on glycine from India.1 On August 3, 

2021, Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on glycine 

from India.2 On February 16, 2022, 

Commerce extended the time limit for 

these preliminary results to June 30, 

2022, in accordance with section 

751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act).3

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

is glycine. For a complete description of 

the scope of the Order, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.4

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Act. Export price and constructed 

export price are calculated in 

accordance with section 772 of the Act. 

Normal value is calculated in 

accordance with section 773 of the Act. 

For a full description of the 

methodology underlying these 

preliminary results, see Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. The 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a 

public document and is made available 

to the public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list 

of the topics discussed in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum is 

attached as an appendix to this notice. 

Rescission of Administrative Review, in 

Part 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the parties that requested a 

review withdraw the request within 90 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation. On November 1, 

2021, GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. 

withdrew its requests for review with 

respect to GEM Corpochem Private 

Limited, Indiana Chem-Port, J.R. 

Corporation, Mulji Mehta Enterprises, 

Mulji Mehta Pharma, Rexisize Rasayan 

Industries, and Studio Disrupt.5 Because 

the requests for review were timely 

withdrawn and no other parties 

requested a review of these companies, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), Commerce is partially 

rescinding this review of the Order for 

these seven companies. 

Application of Facts Available With 

Adverse Inferences 

Pursuant to section 776(a) of the Act, 

Commerce is preliminarily relying upon 

facts otherwise available to determine a 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Kumar Industries/Rudraa International 

(collectively Kumar) 6 because: (1) 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
40508 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 

2020, 86 FR 62508, 62509 n.4 (November 10, 2021). 

For these preliminary results, we continue to treat 

these two companies as a collapsed single entity. 

For this reason, we are not rescinding this 

administrative review for Rudraa International 

individually. 

7See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 7. 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Temporary Rule 

Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due to 

COVID–19, 85 FR 17006, 17007 (March 26, 2020) 

(‘‘To provide adequate time for release of case briefs 

via ACCESS, E&C intends to schedule the due date 

for all rebuttal briefs to be 7 days after case briefs 

are filed (while these modifications remain in 

effect).’’). 

9See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service 

Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of 

Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

10See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2); see also 19 

CFR 351.303 (for general filing requirements). 

11See 19 CFR 351.310(c); see also 19 CFR 351.303 

(for general filing requirements). 

12See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of 

the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 

(February 14, 2012). 

13 Id., 77 FR at 8102–03; see also 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2). 

necessary information is not available 

on the record; and (2) Kumar withheld 

requested information, failed to provide 

such information by the established 

deadlines, and significantly impeded 

this proceeding. Further, Commerce 

preliminarily determines that an 

adverse inference is warranted in 

selecting from among the facts 

otherwise available pursuant to section 

776(b) of the Act because Kumar failed 

to cooperate to the best of its ability. For 

further information, see ‘‘Application of 

Facts Available and Adverse Inferences’’ 

in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Selected Respondents 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the 

Act. Generally, Commerce looks to 

section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which 

provides instructions for calculating the 

all-others rate in a market economy 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for non-examined 

companies in an administrative review. 

Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, 

the all-others rate is normally ‘‘an 

amount equal to the weighted average of 

the estimated weighted average 

dumping margins established for 

exporters and producers individually 

investigated, excluding any zero and de 

minimis margins, and any margins 

determined entirely {on the basis of 

facts available}.’’ 

In this review, we have preliminarily 

calculated a weighted-average dumping 

margin for the mandatory respondent 

Avid Organics Private Limited that is 

not zero, de minimis, or based entirely 

on facts available (i.e., 20.72 percent). 

Accordingly, we have preliminarily 

assigned this rate to Paras Intermediates 

Private Ltd., the sole respondent not 

selected for individual examination in 

this administrative review .7

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period June 1, 

2020, through May 31, 2021. 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Avid Organics Private Limited .................................... 20.72 

Kumar Industries/Rudraa 

International ...................... 31.76 

Paras Intermediates Private 

Ltd. .................................... 20.72 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this 

administrative review within five days 

after public announcement of the 

preliminary results in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

no later than 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, may be filed not later than 

seven days after the date for filing case 

briefs.8 Commerce has modified certain 

of its requirements for serving 

documents containing business 

proprietary information until further 

notice.9 Parties who submit case or 

rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) a statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.10

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS. Requests should contain: (1) 

the party’s name, address and telephone 

number; (2) the number of participants; 

and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. 

Issues raised in the hearing will be 

limited to those raised in case and 

rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing 

is made, Commerce intends to hold the 

hearing at a time and date to be 

determined. An electronically filed 

hearing request must be received 

successfully in its entirety by 

Commerce’s electronic records system, 

ACCESS, by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.11

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

the issues raised in any written briefs, 

no later than 120 days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, unless extended, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

Assessment Rates 

Upon completion of the 

administrative review, Commerce shall 

determine and U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) shall assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. For the 

companies for which we have rescinded 

this review, we intend to instruct CBP 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries at a rate equal to the 

cash deposit rate of estimated 

antidumping duties required at the time 

of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, 

for consumption, during the period of 

review, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to 

issue assessment instructions to CBP for 

the rescinded companies no earlier than 

35 days after the date of publication of 

the preliminary results of this 

administrative review in the Federal 

Register. 

If the weighted-average dumping 

margin for Avid Organics Private 

Limited or Kumar is not zero or de 

minimis in the final results of this 

review, we will calculate, for each 

company, an importer-specific 

assessment rate on the basis of the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for each importer’s examined 

sales and the total entered value of such 

sales in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).12 If any of these 

companies’ weighted-average dumping 

margin is zero or de minimis in the final 

results of review, or if an importerspecific assessment rate for one of these 

companies is zero or de minimis, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.13 For entries of 

subject merchandise during the period 

of review produced by any of these 

companies for which it did not know its 

merchandise was destined for the 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40509 

14See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 

FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 

15See Order, 84 FR at 29171. 

1See Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 76 FR 

30650 (May 26, 2011) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 87 

FR 11416 (March 1, 2022) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, ‘‘Notice 

of Intent to Participate in Sunset Review,’’ dated 

March 15, 2022. 

4See Domestic Interested Party’s Letter, 

‘‘Substantive Response to Notice of Initiation of 

Sunset Review,’’ dated March 30, 2022. 

5See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Sunset Reviews 

Initiated on March 1, 2022,’’ dated April 20, 2022. 

6See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

herby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate unreviewed entries.14

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the notice of final results of 

administrative review for all shipments 

of glycine from India entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the cash 

deposit rate for companies subject to 

this review will be equal to the 

company-specific weighted-average 

dumping margin established in the final 

results of the review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by a company not 

covered in this review but covered in a 

prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published in the 

completed segment for the most recent 

period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 

covered in this review, a prior review, 

or the original investigation but the 

producer is, the cash deposit rate will be 

the rate established in the completed 

segment for the most recent period for 

the producer of the merchandise; (4) the 

cash deposit rate for all other producers 

or exporters will be 7.23 percent, the allothers rate established in the less-thanfair-value investigation, adjusted for the 

export-subsidy rate in the companion 

countervailing duty investigation.15

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 

sections 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2) and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: June 30, 2022. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Application of Facts Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

V. Rate for Non-Selected Respondent 

VI. Discussion of the Methodology 

VII. Currency Conversion 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2022–14482 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–967] 

Aluminum Extrusions From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of the Expedited Second 

Sunset Review of the Antidumping 

Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this expedited 

sunset review, the Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on aluminum extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

as indicated in the ‘‘Final Results of 

Sunset Review’’ section of this notice. 

DATES: Applicable July 7, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carolyn Adie, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–6250. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 1, 2022, Commerce 

published the notice of initiation of the 

second sunset review of the AD order on 

aluminum extrusions from China,1

pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).2 In 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i) 

and (ii), Commerce received notice of 

intent to participate in this sunset 

review from the Aluminum Extrusions 

Fair Trade Committee (the domestic 

interested party), within 15 days after 

the date of publication of the Initiation 

Notice.3 The domestic interested party 

claimed interested party status under 

section 771(9)(E) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.102(b)(29)(vii), as a committee 

composed of U.S. producers of the 

domestic like product. The individual 

committee members claimed interested 

party status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.102(b)(29)(v) as 

U.S. producers of the domestic like 

product. 

Commerce received adequate 

substantive responses to the Initiation 

Notice from the domestic interested 

party within the 30-day period specified 

in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).4 Commerce 

received no substantive responses from 

any respondent interested parties. On 

April 20, 2022, Commerce notified the 

U.S. International Trade Commission 

that it did not receive adequate 

substantive responses from the 

respondent interested parties.5 As a 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the Order 

are aluminum extrusions from China. A 

full description of the scope of the 

Order is contained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.6

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this SUNSET 

review are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of topics 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES