alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
      REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation
    by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-29639) on Form S-8 pertaining
    to the 1996 Stock Option Plan and to options granted outside the plan under
    individual compensation contracts with employees of Empire Resources, Inc.
    and subsidiaries of our report dated March 29, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
    financial statements of Empire Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries included
    in their Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed
    with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 2, 2007.

New York, New YorkMarch 29, 2007

---
V 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5221 

For the relief of Kumi Iizuka-Barcena. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mr. REYES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Kumi Iizuka-Barcena. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. IMMEDIATE RELATIVE STATUS FOR KUMI 

4 IIZUKA-BARCENA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Kumi Iizuka-Barcena, the widow 

6 of a citizen of the United States, shall be classified as an 

7 immediate relative within the meaning of section 

8 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

9 for purposes of the approval of a relative visa petition filed 

10 under section 204 of such Act by her deceased spouse and 

11 the filing of an application for an immigrant visa or for 

12 adjustment of status by Kumi Iizuka-Barcena. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5221 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Kumi Iizuka2 Barcena enters the United States before the filing dead3 line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to 

4 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 

5 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 

6 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION.—Subsections (a) 

9 and (b) shall apply only if Kumi Iizuka-Barcena files an 

10 application for reconsideration of the revocation of the ap11 proval of the relative visa petition referred to in subsection 

12 (a) with appropriate fees not later than 2 years after the 

13 date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Kumi Iizuka-Barcena, the Secretary of State 

17 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, for the 

18 current or next following fiscal year, the worldwide level 

19 of family-sponsored immigrants under section 

20 201(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
CAMPBELL v. BOWMAN

No. COA05-16.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed November 15, 2005.

Certification Date December 5, 2005

Appeal from the Guilford (03CVS8234).

Case Reported Without Published Opinion. Affirmed.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 14, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-1025

Lower Tribunal No. 06-16991

________________

Derrick McPhee,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William L. Thomas, Judge.

Joseph W. Gibson, Jr., for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jill D. Kramer, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee. 

Before SUAREZ, C.J., and WELLS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

SUAREZ, C.J. 

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

The State of Florida moves for rehearing of this Court’s denial of its motion

to recall the August 29, 2014 mandate in order to allow appellate review of
transcripts from a Rule 3.850 evidentiary hearing. Although we grant the State’s

motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior November 3, 2016 opinion and substitute

it with the following, we do so solely to correct the legal basis for denying the

State’s motion to recall the mandate.

We agree with the State that State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co. v. Judges of the

District Court, 405 So. 2d 980, 982 (Fla. 1981) is no longer valid in light of the

Florida State legislature’s repeal of Florida Statute section 35.10 by Laws 2013, c.

2013-25, § 1, effective January 1, 2014. That repeal eliminated terms of court for

purposes of recalling an appellate mandate. The Court’s ability to recall a

mandate, however, is still limited by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.340(a),

which states that “the court may direct the clerk to recall the mandate, but not more

than 120 days after its issuance.” Because the State moved to recall the mandate

more than 120 days from its issuance on August 29, 2014, this Court is without

jurisdiction to recall the mandate. 

Motion for rehearing granted and denial of the motion to recall the mandate

and to reopen the case affirmed. 

2
STATE of North Carolina v. Herman Ellis BREWINGTON.

No. 335P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2005.

Kirby H. Smith, III, Rudolph A. Ashton, III, New Bern, for Herman Ellis Brewington.

David J. Adinolfi, II, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of June 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2005."
Phillip Micheal STROUPE v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 104P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Phillip M. Stroupe, Pro Se.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 18th day of February 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
**We're sorry but onrr-frontend-app-vue doesn't work properly without JavaScript enabled. Please enable it to continue.**
# L_2016155EN.01000501.xml

| 14.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 155/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 155/5

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/927

of 1 June 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Soumaintrain (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Soumaintrain’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France's application to register the name ‘Soumaintrain’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Soumaintrain’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Soumaintrain’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Soumaintrain’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3. Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 June 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 47, 6.2.2016, p. 11.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GRACIELA SOLORIO,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF FRESNO; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 14

- 17192

D.C. No. 1:14

- cv

- 01284

- LJO

BAM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’ Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 16, 2016 **

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

Graciela Solorio appeals pro se from the distric t court’s judgment dismissing

her employment action alleging federal and state cla ims . We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of an

action based on res judicata. Stewart v. U.S. Bancorp , 2 97 F.3d 953, 956 (9th Cir.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 26 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 17192

2002). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Solorio’s action as barred by the

doctrine of res judicata because the claims were based on the same primary right

asserted in a prior state court action that was dismissed

. See Manufactured Home

C mty s. Inc. v. City of San Jose , 420 F.3d 1022, 1031 (9th Cir. 2005) ( “To

determine the preclusive effect of a state court judgment f e deral courts look to state

law.

. . . California’s res judicata doctrine is based on a primary right s theory ”

(citation omitted)); Fed’ n of Hillside & Canyon Ass ’ ns v. City of Los Angeles , 24

Cal. Rptr

. 3d 543, 557 ( Ct. App. 2004) (setting forth elements of res judicata under

California law)

.

T he district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Solorio’s motion to

reconsider because Solorio failed to put forth any b asis that would warrant

reconsideration

. See Sch. Dis t. No. 1J

, Multnomah C ty

. , Or. v. ACandS, Inc. , 5

F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993) (setting forth standard of review) ; see also Kon a

Enter. , Inc. v. Estate of Bishop , 229 F.3d 877, 890 (9th Cir. 2000) (reconsideration

under Rule 59(e) is an “extraordinary remedy, to be used sparingly in the interests

of finality and cons ervation of judicial resources” (citation and internal quotation3 14

- 17192

omitted) )

.

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 29, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00515

- CV

SPECIALTY SELECT CARE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO, L.L.C. d/b/a Casa Rio
Healthcare and Rehabilitation, Appell ant

v.

Adolfo R. JUIEL , Individually, Anna A. Juiel, Individually and on behalf of Isaac Juiel, individually, and as all Heirs of the Estate of Bertha Juiel, deceased and Lisa Ochoa, as Representative of the Estate of Nora Nieto, deceased, Appellee s

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 04911 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

This is an accelerated appeal from an interlocutory order denying appellant’s motion to compel arbitration. T EX

. C IV

. P RAC

. & R EM

. C ODE A NN

. § 51.016 (West Supp. 2013 ) . Appella nt has filed a Motion to Stay Trial Court Proceedings p ending r esolution of th is appeal. Although given the opportunity to respond, appellee d id not do so. We GRANT the motion

.

It is hereby ORDERED that all underlying proceedings in the lawsuit styled Adolfo R. Juiel, Individually and on Behalf of Isaac Juiel, Individually, and as all Heir s of The Estate of
Bertha Juiel, Deceased; and Lisa Och oa, as Representative of The Estate of Nora Nieto, Deceased v. Specialty Select Care of San Antonio, L.L.C. d/b/a Casa Rio Healthcare and

Rehabilitation , and numbered 2014

- CI

- 04911 , pending in the 150t h Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas, is ST AYED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of July, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Marc J. GreeneMarc J. GreeneDate: November 14, 2008
    President and CEO/s/ Rachel MarshallRachel MarshallDate: November 14, 2008
    CFO
**Exhibit
32.1**
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
connection with the quarterly report of Advanced Accessory Holdings Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Alan C. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
ALAN C. JOHNSON
 Alan C.
Johnson
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal
Executive Officer)
 May 13,
2005
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Mountain Valley Bancshares, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principals;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Rachel MarshallRachel MarshallChief Financial Officer 21
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer

In connection
with the Annual Report of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Günther Braun, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |     |                                                                                                                                                       
| | (2) | The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                              |  |                          | 
|----------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | 
|Date:      November
 30, 2010 |  | /s/ Günther
 Braun       | 
|                              |  |                          | 
|                              |  | Günther
 Braun           | 
|                              |  | Chief
 Executive Officer | 

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5344 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5344

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxy-
                    acetic acid, dimethylamine salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2008

 Mrs. Biggert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxy-
                    acetic acid, dimethylamine salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-METHYL-4-CHLOROPHENOXY-ACETIC ACID, DIMETHYLAMINE SALT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.42 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 2-Methyl-4-chlorophenoxy-
acetic acid, dimethylamine salt) is amended by striking the date in the 
effective period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. WILLIAMS

No. COA05-168.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (03CRS236048, 03CRS236049).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**TELANETIX, INC.**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. §1350,            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Telanetix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas N. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,            as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|              |   |                    |
|-------------------|--------|-------------------------|
| Date:May 15, 2008 |   | /s/ Douglas N. Johnson  |
|              |   | Douglas N. Johnson      |
|              |   | Chief Executive Officer |