alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Salamon
Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September
30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: November 14, 2008 | By: | /s/ John E. Salamon    
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------
|                         |     | John E. Salamon        
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer
|                         |     | Chief Financial Officer

---
Tonya Lannette WILLIAMS, and Derrick Scott Hammill, individually and as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Tabith Candace Williams and Tonya Lannette Williams, as parent and legal guardian of the minor v. Alvin E. BELL, Individually and American Bass Fishing Club, Inc.

No. 86P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

Edmund L. Gaines, Statesville, Christopher D. Mauriello, Salisbury, for Tonya Williams et al.

Hatcher B. Kincheloe, Charlotte, for Bell & Bass.

Stephen W. Coles, Lexington, for American Bass Fishing.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of February 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2005."
ϮϬ KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ>ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε

ALASKA 

#33 

Ψϯ͘ρ^WEd/E

ηρ

ς͘κйK&^dd'W

Ϭ͘ςй

OF TOTAL U.S. 

Ψκ͕ΘϬκ

PER RESIDENT 

#37 

Ψϭ͘ΘKEdZd

#27 

Ϯϳ͕ϮϳϭEhDZK&

ηϮρ

Ψϭ͘ϳWZ^KEE>

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

 DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

^ƵƉƉůŝĞƐĂŶĚ

ƋƵŝƉŵĞŶƚ͗ϭρй ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͗ Ϯϳй

^ĞƌǀŝĐĞ͗ ρϳй ZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ

ĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ͗ϭй

By Service 

Army 

47% 

Navy/Marines 

7% 

Air Force 

34% 

Other Defense 

12% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕LJdLJƉĞ

Reserve: 3% 

National Guard:ϭκй

Civilian: 20% 

Active Duty: 64% 

ůůŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ͕By Service 

Army 

52% 

Navy/Marines 

1% 

Air Force 

46% 

Other Defense 

1% 

Top Defense Contractors ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ƌĐƟĐ^ůŽƉĞZĞŐŝŽŶĂůŽƌƉ͘ Ψϭϳϯ͘ρD

ŚƵŐĂĐŚůĂƐŬĂŽƌƉ͘ Ψϭϭε͘ϭD

KD Ψες͘ϳD

ŽLJŽŶhƟůŝƟĞƐ;h>Ϳ ΨεϮ͘ϮD

EĞĞƐĞƌŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ/ŶĐ͘ ΨΘΘ͘εD

/ŶĚLJŶĞ Ψρρ͘ϬD

ZdůĂƐŬĂ:s Ψκκ͘ςD

hE/dͲ^ZŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƟŽŶ ΨϯΘ͘ϭD

ĂůŝƐƚĂ Ψϯς͘ΘD

ĞƌŝŶŐ^ƚƌĂŝƚƐEĂƟǀĞŽƌƉŽƌĂƟŽŶ Ψϯς͘ϭD

Contract Awards Performed ;LJ&ŝƐĐĂůzĞĂƌ͕ďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ΨϮ͘Ϭ

&zϭϮ

Ψϭ͘Θ Ψϭ͘ϳ Ψϭ͘ρ Ψϭ͘ρ

&zϭϯ &zϭκ

Ψϭ͘ϯ Ψϭ͘Ϯ

&zϭρ

Ψϭ͘Ϯ

&zϭς &zϭϳ &zϭΘ &zϭε

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Ψϭ͘ϳ/>>/KE Ϯϳ͕Ϯϳϭ

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

dŽƉĞĨĞŶƐĞWĞƌƐŽŶŶĞů>ŽĐĂƟŽŶƐ

>ŽĐĂƚŝŽŶ ĐƟǀĞ ŝǀŝůŝĂŶ EĂƟŽŶĂů ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ dŽƚĂů

ƵƚLJ 'ƵĂƌĚ

ŶĐŚŽƌĂŐĞ ε͕εκϮ ϯ͕Ϯκϯ Ϯ͕ςϯε ϳκϯ ϭς͕ρςϳ

&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐEŽƌƚŚ^ƚĂƌ ϳ͕ϮϮϭ ϭ͕ϳϮϳ ςες ϳϳ ε͕ϳϮϭ

^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚ&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐ E ϯϬϳ ϮϬς Ϭ E

ĞŶĂůŝ ϯκ ϯϮ εϭ Ϭ ϭρϳ

DĂƚĂŶƵƐŬĂͲ^ƵƐŝƚŶĂ Ϭ E εϯ E E

<ŽĚŝĂŬ/ƐůĂŶĚ ϭς ϭΘ E Ϭ E

:ƵŶĞĂƵ E ϭϮ ϭϯ Ϭ E

ĞƚŚĞů Ϭ E ϭϯ Ϭ E

<ĞŶĂŝWĞŶŝŶƐƵůĂ Ϭ E E Ϭ E

EŽŵĞ Ϭ E E Ϭ E
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR ALASKA 2 0 1 8

FISCAL YEAR 2019 

ĞƚŚĞů :ƵŶĞĂƵ

<ĞƚĐŚŝŬĂŶ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ

ĞŶĂůŝ

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

EŽƌƚŚ^ůŽƉĞ

ƌŝƐƚŽůĂLJ

ůĞƵƚŝĂŶƐtĞƐƚ

zƵŬŽŶͲ<ŽLJƵŬƵŬ

&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐEŽƌƚŚ^ƚĂƌ

^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚ&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐ

ĞŶĂůŝ

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS ;DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ŶĐŚŽƌĂŐĞ

&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐEŽƌƚŚ^ƚĂƌ

^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚ&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐ

ĞŶĂůŝ

zƵŬŽŶͲ<ŽLJƵŬƵŬ

ůĞƵƟĂŶƐtĞƐƚ

ƌŝƐƚŽůĂLJ

<ŽĚŝĂŬ/ƐůĂŶĚ

EŽƌƚŚ^ůŽƉĞ

DĂƚĂŶƵƐŬĂͲ^ƵƐŝƚŶĂ

;<сƚŚŽƵƐĂŶĚƐ͕DсŵŝůůŝŽŶƐ͕сďŝůůŝŽŶƐͿ

ΨεϳϮ͘ρD

ΨϯεϬ͘ϭD

Ψϭρκ͘εD

ΨϭϬϯ͘ςD

ΨϭϬϬ͘ϬD

ΨϮρ͘ρD

Ψϭκ͘ςD

ΨϭϮ͘ϳD

Ψε͘κD

Ψε͘ϭD

ŶĐŚŽƌĂŐĞ

&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐEŽƌƚŚ^ƚĂƌ

^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚ&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐ

ĞŶĂůŝ

DĂƚĂŶƵƐŬĂͲ^ƵƐŝƚŶĂ

<ŽĚŝĂŬ/ƐůĂŶĚ

:ƵŶĞĂƵ

<ĞŶĂŝWĞŶŝŶƐƵůĂ

ĞƚŚĞů

<ĞƚĐŚŝŬĂŶ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ

Ψϭ͘Ϭ

ρϳϯ͘ϳD

Ψκϭ͘ϮD

Ψϭϯ͘εD

$4.4 M 

$2.7 M 

ΨΘΘϬ͘Θ<

Ψρεε͘κ<

ΨϮκς͘κ<

Ψϭϯϯ͘ς<

&ĐƚŝǀĞ &'ƵĂƌĚ &ZĞƐĞƌǀĞ ƌŵLJĐƚŝǀĞ ƌŵLJ'ƵĂƌĚ ƌŵLJZĞƐĞƌǀĞ DĐƚŝǀĞ EĂǀLJĐƚŝǀĞ t,^

DĂƚĂŶƵƐŬĂͲ^ƵƐŝƚŶĂ

&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐEŽƌƚŚ^ƚĂƌ

^ŽƵƚŚĞĂƐƚ&ĂŝƌďĂŶŬƐ

<ĞŶĂŝWĞŶŝŶƐƵůĂ

<ŽĚŝĂŬ/ƐůĂŶĚ

<ŽĚŝĂŬ/ƐůĂŶĚ

ŶĐŚŽƌĂŐĞ

ŶĐŚŽƌĂŐĞ

DĂƚĂŶƵƐŬĂͲ^ƵƐŝƚŶĂ

KĨĨŝĐĞŽĨ >ŽĐĂůĞĨĞŶƐĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJŽŽƉĞƌĂƚŝŽŶͶĞĨĞŶƐĞ^ƉĞŶĚŝŶŐďLJ^ƚĂƚĞ͕&zϮϬϭε 21
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Peter Osborne, in his capacity as Interim Chief Financial Officer of Hansen Medical, Inc., hereby certifies that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | (i) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Hansen Medical, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 10, 2010



/s/    PETER
OSBORNEInterim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Hansen Medical, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the
undersigned officer of Southwest Community Bancorp (the Company), hereby certifies that the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: May 12, 2005 /s/ James L. LemeryJames L. LemeryExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.
STATE of North Carolina v. Jerry Delane JENKINS.

No. 31A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 5, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C.App. ___, 606 S.E.2d 430 (2005), finding no error in a judgment entered 28 May 2003 by Judge James M. Webb in Superior Court, Montgomery County. Heard in the Supreme Court 20 April 2005.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Jane T. Hautin, Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, NC, for the State.

Karlene Scott-Turrentine, Raleigh, NC, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5227 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3,5-Triazine, 2,4,6-tris(2-propenyloxyl)- 

. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2008 

Mr. BONNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1,3,5-Triazine, 2,4,6- 

tris(2-propenyloxyl)-. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 1,3,5-TRIAZINE, 2,4,6-TRIS(2-PROPENYLOXYL)-. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 1,3,5-Triazine, 2,4,6-tris(2- 

propenyloxyl)- (CAS No. 

101–37–1) (provided for in 

subheading 2933.69.60) ........ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5227 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
1. Home
2. Facts
3. What is maritime heritage?

**What is maritime heritage?**  Maritime heritage preserves and protects **valuable historical, cultural, and archaeological resources** within our coastal, marine, and Great Lakes environments. The study of maritime heritage resources may include photo-documentation and archaeological site plans.*The study of maritime heritage resources may include photo-documentation and archaeological site plans.* Maritime heritage includes not only physical resources such as historic shipwrecks and prehistoric archaeological sites, but also archival documents and oral histories. Maritime heritage can also include the stories of indigenous cultures that have lived and used the oceans for thousands of years. There is a maritime heritage component in each of our national marine sanctuaries and two national monuments, whether this is a shipwreck or study of indigenous cultures. The first sanctuary that was created with a maritime heritage component was the Monitor National Marine Sanctuary off the coast of North Carolina in 1975. Maritime heritage resources are best studied without disturbing them and leaving them in place.  In some rare cases, careful archaeological recovery followed by long-term conservation is done to preserve these artifacts in a museum for future generations. Maritime heritage resources, when properly studied and interpreted, add an important dimension to our understanding and appreciation of our nation’s rich maritime legacy, and make us more aware of the critical need for us to be wise stewards of our ocean planet.
  More **Information** Office of National Marine Sanctuaries: Maritime Heritage *Monitor* National Marine Sanctuary   Get **Social** Social
  **Last updated:** 08/24/23 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
Exhibit 32.2





STATEMENT OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the Form10-Q) of Citizens Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (the Company), I, Ronald E. Baron, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



(a)

the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(b)

the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company asof and for the periods presented in the Form l0-Q.



/s/ Ronald E. Baron

Date: August  15, 2005

Ronald E. Baron

Chief Financial Officer
STATE v. Scott David ALLEN.

No. 115A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 20, 2004.

William N. Farrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 19th day of April 2004 by Defendant for Extension of Time for Court Reporter to Prepare the Transcript:

> "Motion Allowed. Court reporter shall have up to and including the 21st day of May 2004 to prepare and deliver transcript to counsel. By order of the Court in conference this the 20th day of April 2004."
----

----

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of, and for, the periods presented in the  Report. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August      11, 2008 |   |  /s/ G. Hunter Haas,      IV                                           G.      Hunter Haas, IVExecutive      Vice President, Chief Investment Officer, InterimChief      Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906
                                     OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Texas Petrochemical Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ending June 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


September 30, 2002                            /s/ CARL S. STUTTS
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Carl S. Stutts
                                              Executive Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer
LYNCH v. WOMBLE, Carlyle.

No. 345P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Richard L. Rainey, Charlotte, for Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 23rd day of June 2005 by Plaintiff for "Notice of Appeal":

"Motion Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference this the 18th day of August 2005."
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2 


CHEVRON CORPORATION
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ EQUITY COMPENSATION AND
DEFERRAL PLAN
[Year] Stock Units Agreement


Name of Director:  [                  ]
Please sign below and submit this Agreement.


Chevron Corporation has made the following grant to you, subject to the terms of the Chevron Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation and Deferral Plan, as amended (the “Directors’ Plan”), and Rules Governing Awards under the Plan, as amended (the “Directors’ Plan Rules”).  Both documents are incorporated into this Agreement and copies are available to you on the Chevron Diligent Boards portal or on request.  By signing this Agreement and accepting this grant, you are agreeing to all the terms and conditions of the Directors’ Plan and the Directors’ Plan Rules.


		
	1.
	Date of Grant:  [                  ].


		
	2.
	The number of Stock Units awarded is [                  ], subject to adjustment as provided in Section 10 of the Plan.


		
	3.
	The Stock Units vest on the last day of the Annual Compensation Cycle to which the Grant relates.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Director has executed this Agreement on the day and year indicated below.








__________________
[Date]
Alejandro MARTINEZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6195

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.A. FISCHER, A.C. RUGH, S.P. LOGAN

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

AUSTIN W. LEAKE

LANCE CORPORAL (E

- 3), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201500 301

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 18 June 2015

. Military Judge: Col C.M. Greer , USMC

. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, 8th Communication

Battalion, II Marine Expeditionary Force, Camp Lejeune, NC

. Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation : LtCol G.W. Riggs,

USMC

. For Appellant: CAPT James A. Talbert , JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian Keller , Esq

.

21 January 2016

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT

----------------------------------------------- ----

After careful consideration of the record, submitted

without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence

as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
SEES v. CLEVELAND CONTAINER SERVICE.

No. COA04-1256.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 5, 2005.

Certification Date July 25, 2005.

Appeal from the NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #191347).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5219 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5219

 To authorize appropriations for the seafood inspection regime of the 
                     Food and Drug Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

  Mr. Weiner introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize appropriations for the seafood inspection regime of the 
                     Food and Drug Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR SEAFOOD INSPECTION 
              REGIME OF FDA.

    For the purpose of implementing the seafood inspection regime of 
the Food and Drug Administration, there is authorized to be 
appropriated $6,750,000 for fiscal year 2009.
                                 <all>
```
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. LOGAN COFIELD, III.

No. COA04-833

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed March 1, 2005.

This case not for publication

Surry County Nos. 03 CRS 2116-17, 03 CRS 2049, 03 CRS 52152, 54430, 03 CRS 54682, 54718, 03 IFS 1752.

*Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Special Deputy Attorney General Melissa L. Trippe, for the State.*

*Appellate Defender Staples Hughes, by Assistant Appellate Defender Charlesena Elliott Walker, for defendant-appellant.*

ELMORE, Judge.

Defendant Logan Cofield, III, pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to delivery of cocaine; two counts of possession of a controlled substance in jail, possession of a firearm by a felon, driving while license revoked, displaying a fictitious tag, second degree trespass, expired/no inspection sticker and exceeding the speed limit. In accordance with the plea agreement, the trial court consolidated the offenses into one judgment and sentenced defendant as a Class G felon to a presumptive term of twenty to twenty-four months imprisonment. Defendant appeals.

Defendant's counsel states that "[a]fter repeated and close examination of the record, review of the relevant law . . . counsel is unable to identify an issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief on appeal" and asks this Court to review the record for possible prejudicial error.

Counsel has shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he has complied with the requirements of *Anders v. California,* 386 U.S. 738, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493, *reh'g denied,* 388 U.S. 924, 18 L. Ed. 2d 1377 (1967), and *State v. Kinch,* 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), by advising defendant of his right to file written arguments with this Court and providing him with documents necessary for him to do so. Defendant has not filed any written arguments on his own behalf with this Court, and a reasonable time in which he could have done so has passed.

In accordance with *Anders,* we must fully examine the record to determine whether any issues of arguable merit appear therefrom or whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. We conclude the appeal is wholly frivolous. In reaching this conclusion, we have conducted our own examination of the record for possible prejudicial error and have found none.

We hold defendant had a fair trial, free from prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges HUNTER and STEELMAN concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
### SCOT-19-0000499 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
ORIGHOYE DENNIS IYONSI, Petitioner,

vs. HAWAI # I POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , P o l l a c k , a n d W i l s o n , J J . )



### Upon consideration of petitioner Orighoye Dennis Iyonsi’s “Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae,” filed as a petition on July 10, 2019, and the record, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate that he is entitled to relief from this court. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, July 17, 2019. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Richard W. Pollack /s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCOT-19-0000499 17-JUL-2019 10:07 AM
STATE v. ASKEW.

No. COA04-1011.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Gates (02CRS50000)

Case reported without published opinion Remanded.