alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of GNC Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 May 5, 2006
    
    /s/ Curtis J. LarrimerCurtis J. LarrimerChief Financial Officer
<Page>

                                                                Exhibit 10.22

July 28, 2005


Michael T. Flavin, Ph.D.
8817 Royal Swan Lane
Darien, IL 60561

Dear Dr. Flavin:

This Letter of Commitment shall serve to restructure the term of repayment of
all of the principal and interest outstanding as of the date of this Letter
of Commitment provided by Michael T. Flavin, Ph.D. to Advanced Life
Sciences, Inc. (the "Flavin Debt").

The effectiveness of this Letter of Commitment shall be contingent upon the
successful Initial Public Offering of Advanced Life Sciences Holdings,
Inc. (the "IPO").

     -  TERM- Subject to the terms of any subordination agreement, the Flavin
        Debt is hereby restructured to become due and payable in one lump sum
        on December 31, 2007.

     - ALL OTHER TERMS (collateral, interest rate, covenants, subordination,
       prepayment, etc.)- all other terms shall remain substantially the same
       as the terms agreed to in that certain Promissory Note executed by the
       parties on September 1, 2001.

If this Letter of Commitment is acceptable to you, please indicate your
approval by signing in the space provided below.


Sincerely,


/s/ Michael T. Flavin
R. Richard Wieland II
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer


/s/ Michael T. Flavin
-----------------------------------
Michael T. Flavin, Ph.D.
# L_2016234EN.01000801.xml

| 31.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 234/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 234/8

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/1438

of 18 August 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Oriel Sea Minerals (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Ireland's application to register the name ‘Oriel Sea Minerals’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Ireland's application to register the name ‘Oriel Sea Minerals’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Oriel Sea Minerals’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Oriel Sea Minerals’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Oriel Sea Minerals’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.6. Salt, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 August 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Carlos MOEDAS

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 155, 30.4.2016, p. 11.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2017029EN.01006902.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 29/69 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251 of 4 October 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories with regard to regulatory technical standards for risk-mitigation techniques for OTC derivative contracts not cleared by a central counterparty

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 340 of 15 December 2016](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2016_340_R_TOC)
)

On page 37, in point (ii) of Article 36(2)(b):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(ii) | the applicable date determined pursuant to paragraph 3.’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘(ii) | the applicable date determined pursuant to paragraph 1.’. |

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5154 

To condition further increases in the minimum wage applicable to American 

Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands on 

a determination by the Secretary of Labor that such increases will 

not have an adverse impact on the economies of American Samoa and 

the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

A BILL 

To condition further increases in the minimum wage applicable to American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the 

Northern Mariana Islands on a determination by the 

Secretary of Labor that such increases will not have 

an adverse impact on the economies of American Samoa 

and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5154 IH

1 SECTION 1. MINIMUM WAGE IN AMERICAN SAMOA AND 

2 COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MAR3 IANA ISLANDS. 

4 Title VIII of the U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans’ 

5 Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appro6 priations Act, 2007 is amended— 

7 (1) in section 8103(b)— 

8 (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by inserting be9 fore the semicolon the following: ‘‘, if the Sec10 retary of Labor determines, based on the study 

11 required under section 8104 and in consultation 

12 with the Secretary of the Interior and the gov13 ernment of the Commonwealth of the Northern 

14 Mariana Islands, that an increase under this 

15 subparagraph will not have an adverse impact 

16 on the economy of Commonwealth of the North17 ern Mariana Islands’’; 

18 (B) in paragraph (2)(C), by inserting be19 fore the period the following: ‘‘, if the Secretary 

20 of Labor determines, based on the study re21 quired under section 8104 and in consultation 

22 with the Secretary of the Interior and the gov23 ernment of American Samoa, that an increase 

24 under this subparagraph will not have an ad25 verse impact on the economy of American 

26 Samoa’’; and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5154 IH

1 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

2 ‘‘The Secretary of Labor shall make the determinations 

3 required under paragraphs (1)(B) and (2)(C) each year 

4 at least 60 days before the scheduled increase in the min5 imum wage required under each such subparagraph, and 

6 shall publish such determinations in the Federal Reg7 ister.’’; and 

8 (2) in section 8104— 

9 (A) by inserting ‘‘and every 2 years there10 after,’’ after ‘‘enactment of this Act,’’ both 

11 places it appears; and 

12 (B) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘study’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘studies’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
#### Nazmuil Rohaman et al., Respondents, v Isaac Regan et al., Respondents, and Brooklyn Union Gas Company, Appellant.

[801 NYS2d 77]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company appeals from an order *942of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Flug, J.), dated March 19, 2001, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company (hereinafter Brooklyn Union) sustained its burden of demonstrating its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidentiary proof that it was not performing work in the vicinity of the subject intersection on the date of the accident and that it did not own the construction equipment that allegedly contributed to the accident by obstructing the plaintiff driver’s view of oncoming traffic *(see Robertson v City of New York,*21 AD3d 939 [2005] [decided herewith]). The evidence submitted by the plaintiffs in opposition to the motion was insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether Brooklyn Union owned the construction equipment claimed to have obstructed the plaintiff driver’s view, or whether any other negligence on Brooklyn Union’s part contributed to the accident *(see Robertson v City of New York, supra).*Krausman, J.P., Mastro, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
Golden State Bancorp Inc. :

We consent to the incorporation by reference in registration  statements on Form
S-8 (Nos.  333-67837 and 333-74615) and in  registration  statements on Form S-3
(Nos.  333-37322 and 333-76302) of Golden State Bancorp Inc. of our report dated
January 15, 2002,  with  respect to the  consolidated  balance  sheets of Golden
State Bancorp Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2001 and 2000,  and the
related consolidated statements of income,  comprehensive income,  stockholders'
equity  and cash  flows for each of the  years in the  three-year  period  ended
December 31, 2001,  which report  appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report
on Form 10-K of Golden State Bancorp Inc.

Our report dated January 15, 2002,  contains an  explanatory  paragraph  stating
that Golden State Bancorp Inc.  changed its method of accounting for derivatives
and hedging activities in 2001.



                                                       /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                --------------------------------
                                                           KPMG LLP



San Francisco, California
March 27, 2002
#### In the Matter of Daniel G. Martin, Appellant, v Diane M. Martin, Respondent.

[801 NYS2d 851]

Appeal from an amended order of the Family Court, Seneca County (Dennis F. Bender, J.), entered April 20, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The amended order, insofar as appealed from, denied in part the objections of petitioner to an order of the Support Magistrate, dated January 5, 2004, which, after a hearing, set petitioner’s child support and maintenance obligations.

It is hereby ordered that the amended order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting objection No. 3 in part and providing that reduced maintenance shall continue until September 20, 2005 and as modified the amended order is affirmed without costs.

*1370Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding seeking to modify the judgment of divorce by, inter alia, terminating the award of maintenance. Petitioner alleged that he was involuntarily terminated from his employment and thus that there was the requisite change in circumstances to warrant the modification. Petitioner was employed at the time of the hearing on the petition, but his income was less than respondent’s income. Although the Support Magistrate reduced the amount of maintenance, he directed that maintenance “shall continue pursuant to the terms set forth in the [judgment of] divorce,” i.e., until April 15, 2007, unless an event set forth in the judgment of divorce occurred prior to that date and thereby triggered the termination of petitioner’s maintenance obligation. Family Court granted in part petitioner’s objections to the order of the Support Magistrate by further reducing the amount of maintenance.

Pursuant to the parties’ judgment of divorce, the obligation of petitioner to pay maintenance would terminate upon, inter alia, his involuntary termination from employment, but the judgment further provided that, in that event, respondent could nevertheless “make application to a court of competent jurisdiction for a determination of [petitioner’s] obligation to continue to pay maintenance to her.” At the hearing on the petition, the Support Magistrate ascertained that respondent, who was proceeding pro se, wished to “have [maintenance] reviewed and decreased if need be, not eliminated.” Contrary to petitioner’s contention, respondent demonstrated the need for reduced maintenance to continue although, as respondent correctly concedes, she demonstrated such need only until September 20, 2005, the date of her younger child’s 22nd birthday. We therefore modify the amended order accordingly. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Smith, Pine and Hayes, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, Bruce D. Hansen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of General Moly, Inc. for thequarter ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of General Moly, Inc.

 
| Dated: December 9,  2009 |                           |                    |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                          |                           |                    |
|                          | By:                            | /s/ Bruce D.  Hansen    |
|                          | Name:                          | Bruce D. Hansen         |
|                          | Title:                         | Chief Executive Officer |
|                          | (Principal Executive  Officer) |
|                               |                                |                         |  |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32

                             CERTIFICATION OF

                      PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

                          CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     In connection with the Annual Report of Apex Minerals Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the
"Report"), I, Howard Oveson, President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.


/s/ Howard Oveson
Howard Oveson, President

Date:  September 26, 2003
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Celia A. Powell, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[800 NYS2d 790]

*1167Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 26, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant lost her employment as a psychiatric technician in a hospital due to disqualifying misconduct. “It is well settled that a claimant’s failure to comply with the employer’s policies and procedures may constitute disqualifying misconduct, especially in cases where the claimant is employed as a medical professional whose failure to adhere to prescribed safety procedures could jeopardize the safety of a patient” *(Matter of Martin [Commissioner of Labor],*299 AD2d 624, 624 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 507 [2003] [citations omitted]; *see Matter of Shene [Commissioner of Labor],*304 AD2d 942 [2003]). The record establishes that claimant was discharged after she tested a patient’s blood glucose that resulted in an elevated level and, thereafter, failed to comply with the employer’s policy that she verbally inform the registered nurse of the results immediately in order that proper and timely medical care could be administered. It was not until the registered nurse overheard claimant’s conversation regarding the patient’s elevated blood glucose level that claimant relayed the test results, resulting in a delay in the patient obtaining the appropriate treatment. Claimant’s representation to the effect that she properly reported the results to the registered nurse created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve *(see Matter of Elewa [Commissioner of Labor],*249 AD2d 618, 618-619 [1998]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
STATE v. CRAWFORD

No. COA04-461

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed May 17, 2005

Certification Date June 6, 2005

Appeal from Moore (01CRS50286).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. MOORE

No. COA04-1482

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed November 1, 2005

Certification Date November 21, 2005

Appeal from Wake (01CRS81075, 01CRS81841).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

 

(1)         this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)         the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gander Mountain Company.

 
| Dated: December 18, 2007 |     |                                    |
|-------------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------|
|                          |     | /s/ Mark R. Baker                       |
|                          |     | Mark R. Baker                           |
| * *                      | * * | *President and Chief Executive Officer* |
|                          |     |                                    |
|                          |     |                                    |
|                          |     | /s/ Robert J. Vold                      |
|                          |     | Robert J. Vold                          |
| * *                      | * * | *Senior Vice President,*                |
| * *                      | * * | *Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer* |

 

 

----
STATE v. FISHER & McQUEEN.

No. 559A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2004.

James R. Parish, Fayetteville, for McQueen.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of December 2004 for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Cumberland County Board of Education shall have up to and including the 16th day of January 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of December 2004."
PROTECTING OUR PLANET STARTS WITH YOU

Don’t send 

chemicals 

into our 

waterways.

Learn how to make smart seafood 

choices at www.FishWatch.gov.

Volunteer!

choose sustainable 

Choose nontoxic 

chemicals in the 

home and office.

Volunteer for 

cleanups in your 

community. You 

can get involved 

in protecting your 

watershed too!

Energy efficient light 

bulbs reduce 

greenhouse gas 

emissions. Also flip the 

light switch off when 

you leave the room!

Long-lasting 

light bulbs

- ARE A -

EDUCATE

reduce

REUSE

recycle

DRIVE LESS

BIKE MORE

When you further your own 

education, you can help others 

understand the importance and 

value of our natural resources.

-SHOPWISELY

Buy less 

plastic and 

bring a 

reusable 

shopping bag.

PLANT

A TREE

Trees provide 

food and 

oxygen. They 

help save 

energy, clean 

the air, and 

help combat 

climate change.

sea food

The less water 

you use, the 

less runoff and 

wastewater that 

eventually end 

up in the ocean.

Cut down on what you throw 

away. Follow the three “R’s” to 

conserve natural resources and 

landfill space.

oceanservice.noaa.gov