alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5238 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5238

 To repeal a requirement to reduce by 2 percent the amount payable to 
                    each State in fiscal year 2008.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2008

Mr. Pearce (for himself, Mr. Young of Alaska, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mrs. 
Cubin, Mr. Heller of Nevada, Mrs. McMorris Rodgers, Mr. Cannon, and Mr. 
    Sali) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal a requirement to reduce by 2 percent the amount payable to 
                    each State in fiscal year 2008.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring the West's Fair Share Act 
of 2008''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) Congress agreed to give each State a fair share of the 
        receipts generated from mineral development on Federal lands in 
        the State. In essence, the State government and Federal 
        Government were to be partners in the mineral production that 
        takes place on Federal lands.
            (2) The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 (Public Law 
        110-161) reduces these State receipts by as much as 2 percent 
        for fiscal year 2008.
            (3) The States have at least as much interest in public 
        lands within their borders as does the central Federal 
        Government.
            (4) The Federal Government does not pay property taxes for 
        public lands to States or localities in any form approaching 
        financial equity. As a consequence, those States in which there 
        are Federal public land holdings are denied revenues that are 
        needed for necessary public purposes, such as education, roads, 
        and hospitals. This creates a burden on private owners of 
        property. The burden is greater for private owners of property 
        in States with larger Federal public land holdings.
            (5) The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 will have a 
        negative impact on mineral producing Western States.

SEC. 3. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT TO DEDUCT FROM AN AMOUNT PAYABLE TO EACH 
              STATE.

    Title I of division F of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 
is amended under the heading ``Minerals Management Service'', under the 
heading ``administrative provisions'', by striking the second sentence.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5242 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5242

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           deduction of State and local general sales taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2008

Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
           deduction of State and local general sales taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEDUCTION OF STATE AND LOCAL GENERAL SALES TAXES MADE 
              PERMANENT.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph 5 of section 164(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to general sales taxes) is amended by 
striking subparagraph (I).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Richard Charles Fininen, Appellant

No. 06-16-00039-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 5th District Court of Cass 

County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2015F00270). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Carter* participating. *Justice Carter, 

Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Richard Charles Fininen, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 27, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
STATE v. David Franklin HURT.

No. 192A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 2, 2004.

Robert C. Montgomery, Assistant Attorney General, James C. Gaither, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

Barbara Blackman, Assistant Appellate Defender, for Hurt.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 29th day of July 2004 by Attorney General for Extension of Time to File State's Response to Motion for Appropriate Relief:

> "Motion Allowed. Attorney General shall have up to and including the 13th day of August 2004 to file Response with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 2nd day of August 2004."
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in
Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Peter Osborne, in his capacity as Interim Chief
Financial Officer of Hansen Medical, Inc., hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (i) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Hansen
Medical, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 10, 2011



/S/ PETER OSBORNEInterim Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


This
certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Hansen Medical, Inc. under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
STATE of North Carolina v. Johnathan Earl McKOY.

No. 319P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Johnathan Earl McKoy, Pro Se.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Ben David, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 2nd day of June 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, New Hanover County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 I, William D. Johnston, President and Chief Executive Officer, of Inhibitex,
Inc. certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Inhibitex, Inc. for
the third quarter of fiscal 2004;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant is made known to us by others within the entity,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date:
November 15, 2004/s/ William D. JohnstonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 28
exv10w1



 









Exhibit 10.1




Summary of Adeza Biomedical Corporation Non-employee

Director Cash Retainer Policy Adopted on July 22, 2005




     The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Adeza Biomedical Corporation (the
“Company”) has adopted a cash retainer policy for non-employee directors of the Company. Pursuant
to the policy: (i) the chairman of the Board of Directors will receive a quarterly retainer of
$10,000; (ii) the chair of each of the standing committees of the Board of Directors (other than
the chairman of the Board of Directors) will receive a quarterly retainer of $9,000; and (iii) each
other non-employee director will receive a quarterly retainer of $8,000. The quarterly retainers
provided for in the policy are intended to cover up to 15 in person board and committee meetings
annually. Directors will receive an additional $1,000 per in person board or committee meeting in
excess of 15 meetings.



     The above-described cash retainer policy is in addition to the automatic option grant
provisions of the Company’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan applicable to non-employee directors.
EXHIBIT 21.1

              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF ROFIN-SINAR TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Rofin-Sinar, Inc.
PRC Laser Corporation
PRC Europe N.V.
Lee Laser, Inc.
Rofin-Sinar Technologies Europe S.L.
Rofin-Sinar Laser GmbH
Rofin-Baasel Japan Corp.
Rasant-Alcotec Beschichtungstechnik GmbH
CBL Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH
Carl Baasel Lasertechnik GmbH & Co. KG
Rofin-Baasel, Inc.
Wegmann-Baasel Laser und elektrooptische Geraete GmbH
Optoskand AB
PMB Elektronik GmbH
Rofin-Baasel Italiana S.r.l.
Rofin-Baasel France S.A.
Rofin-Sinar UK Ltd.
Rofin-Baasel UK Ltd.
Rofin-Baasel Benelux B.V.
Rofin-Baasel Singapore PTE Ltd.
Rofin-Baasel Espana S.L.
DILAS Diodenlaser GmbH
Rofin-Baasel Taiwan Ltd.
Rofin-Baasel Korea Co., Ltd.
STATE v. John Marvin TRENT.

No. 520A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Joel H. Brewer, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, for Trent.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 10th day of November 2004 by Defendant to Strike Argument from State's New Brief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of June 2005."
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

##  

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Hospira, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Thomas E. Werner, Senior Vice President, Financeand Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  THOMAS  E. WERNER    |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|
| Thomas  E. Werner                   |   |
| Senior  Vice President, Finance and |   |
| Chief  Financial Officer            |   |
| August 6,  2008                |   |

 

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification
Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, James L. Lemery, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 of Southwest Community Bancorp; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 13, 2004 /s/ James L. LemeryJames L. LemeryExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
STATE v. Alexander C. POLKE.

No. 412A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 6, 2005.

Garland N. Yates, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of September 2005 by Defendant for Extension of Time to Serve Proposed Record on Appeal:

"Motion Allowed. Defendant shall have up to and including the 10th day of October 2005 to serve his/her proposed record upon the district attorney. The parties shall then proceed to settle and file the record on appeal pursuant to the provisions of Appellate Rules 11 and 12. By order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of September 2005."
**Exhibit 10.76**

**HANSEN MEDICAL DEUTSCHLAND GMBH**

April 12, 2011 

Dr. Roland A. Peplinski 

Dear Roland: 

You and Hansen Medical Deutschland GmbH (the “Company”) entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of February 28, 2009 (by you) and March 3, 2009 (by the Company). In order toclarify your annual variable compensation opportunity, you and the Company agree that Section 5(3) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows: 

(3) Annual Variable Compensation. The company will agree with the Employee on quarterly targets and goals that are agreed to at thebeginning of each calendar year and subject to quarterly review and which may be based on sales of the Company’s products and/or services, orders, revenues, deferred revenue, profits, margin, procedures performed, number of units sold, or anyother sales, revenue or profit-based metrics. Employee’s annual variable compensation opportunity may be expressed as a percentage of one or more of the foregoing metrics (with or without any threshold or maximum), in relation to increases inone or more of the foregoing metrics and/or as a bonus if a stated goal is achieved. If no agreement can be reached on objectives the employer shall decide as appears just to him. The respective written agreement in force on the objectives formspart of the contract of employment. If an employee’s employment is terminated during the calendar year the bonus payment is payable pro rata temporis. In the event of an unjustified termination of employment on the part of the employee or adismissal without notice any bonus payment is forfeited. The bonus payment shall be reduced proportionally for times the employer is released from his obligation to pay remuneration, e.g. due to permanent disability or suspension of the employmentrelationship. As far as the employer effects deductions they shall be offset against bonus payment. For excess payments the employer is granted a contractual claim to repayment covering the amount overpaid. 

*** * * * ***

Except as expressly set forth above, the Employment Agreement will remainin effect without change. 

You may indicate your agreement with this amendment of the Employment Agreement bysigning and dating the enclosed duplicate original of this letter agreement and returning it to me. This letter agreement may be executed in two counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but both of which together will constitute oneand the same instrument. 

 

Very truly yours,

Hansen Medical Deutschland GmbH

By:
 
/s/ Peter Osborne

Title:  Interim CFO

Hansen Medical Inc.

Parent Company to Hansen Medical

Deutschland GmbH

(A Wholly Owned Subsidiary)

 

Accepted and agreed to:

/s/ Dr. Roland A. Peplinski

 

Dr. Roland A. Peplinksi

Dated: April 12, 2011
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Marc J. Greene, President and CEO, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mountain Valley Bancshares, Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: November 13, 2007             /s/ Marc J. Greene         Marc J. Greene
Harold BLAKE, Petitioner v. Mark S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.

No. 19-6430

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.