alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5212 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5212

     To suspend temporarily the duty on Gas Flow Control Valve 100 
                          milliliters minimum.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 29, 2008

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To suspend temporarily the duty on Gas Flow Control Valve 100 
                          milliliters minimum.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GAS FLOW CONTROL VALVE 100 MILLILITERS MINIMUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00        Gas Flow Control   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          Valve 100                                                          31/2011.......
                          milliliters
                          minimum (provided
                          for in subheading
                          8481.80.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Dismissed and Opinion Filed April 19, 2018 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-01465-CV
HHRCD, LLC AND MARK CROSSLIN, Appellants V. D ANDI N ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14474



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Francis Before the Court is the parties’ joint agreed motion to dismiss the appeal based on

settlement. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(2).

171465F.P05 /Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

HHRCD, LLC AND MARK CROSSLIN, Appellants

No. 05-17-01465-CV V.

D ANDI N ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14474. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Fillmore and Whitehill participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

As per the parties’ agreement, we ORDER each party bear its own costs of this appeal.

Judgment entered April 19, 2018.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Green Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Arnold Hughes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   

Dated this 22ndday of October, 2007.

ARNOLD HUGHESArnold Hughes, Principal Financial Officer,Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer


































---
----

|   | 1. | The                periodic report containing financial statements to which this certificate                is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of                1934. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the periodic report to which this certificate                is                an exhibit fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial                condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                           |                                                         |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |                                                         |   |
| Date: March                31, 2006  | /s/                Andrew D. Feshbach                   |   |
|                                           | Andrew                D. Feshbach                            |
|                                           | President                & Chief Executive Officer  |

----
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PROLOR Biotech, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:




(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PROLOR Biotech, Inc.




/s/ Abraham HavronAbraham HavronChief Executive OfficerPROLOR Biotech, Inc.May 10, 2011




The certification set forth above is being furnished as an Exhibit solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes—Oxley Act of 2002 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document of PROLOR Biotech, Inc. or the certifying officers.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrants. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            |         |   |   |                                                  |
|---------------------------------|--------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      August 13, 2008      |    | BY:    |   | /s/ WILLIAM S. MORRIS IV                              |
|                            |    |   |   | William      S. Morris IVChief      Executive Officer |
|                            |         |   |
| Date: August 13, 2008 |    | BY:    |   | /s/ STEVE K. STONE                                    |
|                            |    |   |   | Steve      K. StoneChief      Financial Officer       |
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4958 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4958

  To suspend temporarily the duty on glycerol ester of dimerized gum.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2008

 Mr. David Davis of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on glycerol ester of dimerized gum.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GLYCEROL ESTER OF DIMERIZED GUM.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Glycerol ester of  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         dimerized gum                                                      31/2011
                         (100%) rosin,
                         catalyzed with
                         sulfuric acid,
                         softening point
                         not less than 104
                         degrees
                         centigrade, acid
                         number 3 to 8,
                         (CAS No. 68475-37-
                         6) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         3806.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5195 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Red 30-kilovolt high-frequency cable, 

30 square millimeters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Red 30-kilovolt highfrequency cable, 30 square millimeters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RED 30-KILOVOLT HIGH-FREQUENCY CABLE, 30 

4 SQUARE MILLIMETERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

HR 5195 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Red 30-kilovolt high-frequency cable, 30 square millimeters. Helu part number 

700375, type KH–SO–2XCY 

(provided for in subheading 

8544.60.20) ........................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                        Jurisdiction
Subsidiary                                            of Organization
----------                                            ---------------
<S>                                                    <C>
Superior TeleCom Inc. .................................... Delaware
Superior Trust I ......................................... Delaware
DNE Systems, Inc. ........................................ Delaware
DNE Manufacturing & Service Company ...................... Delaware
DNE Technologies, Inc. ................................... Delaware
Superior Essex Inc. ...................................... Delaware
Superior Telecommunications Inc. ......................... Georgia
Superior Cable Corporation ............................... Ontario
Texas SUT Inc. ........................................... Texas
Superior Cable Ltd. ...................................... Israel
Cables of Zion United Works Ltd. ......................... Israel
SUT Acquisition Corporation  ............................. Delaware
Essex International Inc. (80+%)  ......................... Delaware
Essex Group Inc. ......................................... Michigan
Essex Services Inc. ...................................... Delaware
Diamond Wire & Cable Company  ............................ Illinois
Essex Technology Inc. .................................... Delaware
Essex International Ltd. ................................. U.K.
Temple Electrical Ltd. ................................... U.K.
Interstate Industries Holdings, Inc. ..................... Delaware
Interstate Industries, Inc. .............................. Mississippi
Essex Group Export Inc. .................................. Barbados
Essex Canada Inc. ........................................ Delaware
SX Mauritius Holding, Inc. ............................... Mauritius
Active Industries, Inc. .................................. Delaware
Essex Funding Inc. ....................................... Delaware
Essex Group Mexico, Inc. ................................. Delaware
Essex Mexico HOldings, Inc. .............................. Delaware
Essex Group Mexico, S.A. de C.V. ......................... Mexico
Grupo Essex de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. ................ Mexico

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5350 Engrossed Amendment Senate (EAS)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

                  In the Senate of the United States,

                    September 26 (legislative day, September 17), 2008.
    Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 
5350) entitled ``An Act to authorize the Secretary of Commerce to sell 
or exchange certain National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
property located in Norfolk, Virginia, and for other purposes.'', do 
pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            On page 4, after line 20, insert:

            Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary 
        of Commerce, through the Under Secretary and Administrator of 
        the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), is 
        authorized to enter into a land lease with Mobile County, 
        Alabama for a period of not less than 40 years, on such terms 
        and conditions as NOAA deems appropriate, for purposes of 
        construction of a Gulf of Mexico Disaster Response Center 
        facility, provided that the lease is at no cost to the 
        government. NOAA may enter into agreements with state, local, 
        or county governments for purposes of joint use, operations and 
        occupancy of such facility.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H.R. 5350

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```
U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL

Designation of Personal Legal Representative

OSC Case No. 

By signing this form you indicate that you have voluntarily chosen the attorney designated below to

serve as your personal legal representative in the above-mentioned U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC)

matter. The attorney designated by you must also indicate agreement to such designation by signing below.

In limited instances where your employer has found it appropriate, you may request to have an

attorney from your agency represent you in this matter. You are not required to do so. You may proceed

with a private attorney or with no attorney. If you choose to have an attorney from your agency personally

represent you, you understand that a conflict of interest may arise by virtue of that attorney’s responsibilities

to his or her employer, the agency, which may require that attorney to withdraw from representing you.

I hereby designate to serve as my personal legal representative during

the course of this OSC investigation.

Name of Individual Date

Signature of Individual

Private Attorney 

 

 

Name of Personal Legal Representative Date

Signature of Personal Legal Representative

Telephone Number: 

Email Address:

Address:

Federal Agency Attorney 

I am an attorney for the federal government and have obtained approval from appropriate agency

authorities, which may include my supervisor and the Designated Agency Ethics Official, to represent the 

above-named individual in this OSC matter. To the best of my knowledge, my representation complies with 18 

U.S.C. § 205 and other ethics laws. For purposes of this investigation, I personally represent the individual

named above; I am not representing the agency in this matter. I understand that OSC has requested that I keep 

any information learned in the course of my representation confidential during OSC’s investigation and not 

share such information with other individuals. 

Name of Personal Legal Representative Date

Signature of Personal Legal Representative

Telephone Number: 

Email Address:

Address:
Anthony Payne SILER v. Ripley RAND, Resident Superior Court Judge.

No. 396P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 5, 2005.

Anthony Payne Siler, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 27th day of July 2005 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Chatham County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 5th day of August 2005."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5283 

To extend the suspension of duty on Quinclorac. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2008 

Mr. FERGUSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Quinclorac. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. QUINCLORAC. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.07 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 3,7-dichloro-8-quinolinecarboxylic acid) is amended by 

7 striking the date in the effective period column and insert8 ing ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5283 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Letter, dated July 27, 2005, to Stephen B. Bram


 Exhibit 10.4 
  
  
 

 
  
 Eugene R. McGrath

 Chairman of the Board 
  
  
 July 27, 2005 
  
 Mr. Stephen B. Bram 
 9 Irene Court 

Edison, NJ 08820 
  
 Dear Mr. Bram: 
  
 As Group
President, Energy and Communications, you became an employee of Consolidated Edison Solutions (“CES”) effective January 1, 2003. This will confirm that while you are employed by CES, you will continue to accrue pension credit under
the Consolidated Edison Retirement Plan (the “Retirement Plan”) and the Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Supplemental Retirement Income Plan (the “SRIP”). Your years of service and compensation earned
as an employee of CES will be included in determining your pension benefits. When you decide to retire, your pension will be calculated under the formulas and benefit provisions applicable to Officers of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Your pension will be paid under the Retirement Plan and the SRIP. 
  
 Sincerely, 
  
  
 /s/ Eugene R. McGrath
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 11.1

Integrated Technology USA, Inc.
Earnings per share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                               Days
                                         Period                Out-      Shares       Weighted   Weighted Avg.    Net      Net Loss
                                         Outstanding         standing  Outstanding     Shares       Shares        Loss     Per Share
                                         -----------         --------  -----------     ------       ------        ----     ---------
<S>                                      <C>                 <C>       <C>             <C>          <C>           <C>      <C>
Year ended December 31,1995

Balance at 1/1/95                       1/1/95-12/31/95         365     2,430,755    887,225,547    2,430,755
Shares issued                           2/15/95-12/31/95        320       298,913     95,652,091      262,061
Cheap stock issued                      1/1/95-12/31/95 (A)                83,532                      83,532
Cheap stock issued                      1/1/95-12/31/95 (A)               116,979                     116,979
1995/96 cheap warrants/options          1/1/95-12/31/95 (A)               202,035                     202,035
                                                                        ---------                   ---------
                                                                        3,132,214                   3,095,361  (1,683,064)    (0.54)
                                                                        ---------                   ---------
Year ended December 31, 1996

Balance at 1/1/96                    1/1/96 - 12/31/96          366     2,930,178  1,072,445,148    2,930,178
IPO                                   10/7/96-12/31/96           86     3,000,000    258,000,000      704,918
Exercise of Bridge Warrants           11/4/96-12/31/96           58        66,667      3,866,686       10,565
Exercise of Bridge Warrants          11/12/96-12/31/96           50         8,334        416,700        1,139
Cheap stock 95-96                     1/1/96 - 10/6/96(A)       280       204,020     57,125,600      156,081
                                                                        ---------                   ---------
                                                                        6,209,199                   3,802,880  (2,920,099)    (0.77)
                                                                        ---------                   ---------
                                                                                                                 (224,061)    (0.06)
                                                                                                               (2,696,068)    (0.71)
</TABLE>

 (A) Computed using the treasury stock method and an estimated offering price
     of $6 per share.