40548 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

seeking a permit to conduct natural or 

social science research and collection 

activities in individual units of the 

National Park System. Individuals who 

receive a permit must report annually 

on the activities conducted under the 

permit using form 10–226, 

‘‘Investigator’s Annual Report.’’ 

The NPS forms 10–741C ‘‘Permittee 

Field Check-In Report’’ and 10–741D 

‘‘Permittee Field Check-Out Report’’ 

information requested will give parks 

real-time knowledge of what activities 

are taking place and where ensuring 

fieldwork conducted conforms with the 

permitted activity. 

The information in this collection is 

used to manage the use and preservation 

of park resources, and to report on the 

status of permitted research and 

collecting activities. We encourage 

respondents to use RPRS to complete 

and submit applications and reports. 

Additional information about existing 

applications, reporting forms, guidance, 

and explanatory material can be found 

on the RPRS website (https://

irma.nps.gov/RPRS/). 

Title of Collection: Research Permit 

and Reporting System Applications and 

Reports, 36 CFR 2.1 and 2.5. 

OMB Control Number: 1024–0236. 

Form Number: NPS Forms 10–226, 

10–741A, 10–741B, 10–741C and 10– 

741D. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents/Affected Public: 

Individuals; businesses; academic and 

research institutions; and Federal, State, 

local, and tribal governments. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Respondents: 8,590. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Responses: 8,590. 

Estimated Completion Time per 

Response: Varies from 15 minutes to 83 

minutes, depending on activity. 

Total Estimated Number of Annual 

Burden Hours: 5,684. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Required to 

obtain or retain a benefit. 

Frequency of Collection: On occasion 

for applications; annually for reports. 

Total Estimated Annual Nonhour 

Burden Cost: None. 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor and a person is not required to 

respond to a collection of information 

unless it displays a currently valid OMB 

control number. 

The authority for this action is the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

Phadrea Ponds, 

Information Collection Clearance Officer, 

National Park Service. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14483 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1256] 

Certain Portable Battery Jump Starters 

and Components Thereof; Notice of 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review a Final Initial Determination of 

Violation of Section 337 With Respect 

to Two Trademarks, and To Review 

and, on Review, Affirm a Finding of 

Violation With Respect to a Patent; 

Schedule for Filing Written 

Submissions on Remedy, the Public 

Interest, and Bonding 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review a final initial determination 

(‘‘Final ID’’) issued by the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

finding a violation of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, with respect to U.S. 

Trademark Registration Nos. 4,811,656 

(‘‘the ’656 mark’’) and 4,811,749 (‘‘the 

’749 mark’’) by defaulting respondent 

Zhejiang Quingyou Electronic 

Commerce Co., Ltd. (‘‘Zhejiang 

Quingyou’’) and with respect to the ’749 

mark by defaulting respondent 

Shenzhen Mediatek Tong Technology 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Mediatek’’). The Commission 

has further determined to review in part 

and, on review, affirm a finding of no 

violation with respect to U.S. Patent No. 

10,604,024 (‘‘the ’024 patent’’) based on 

the complainant’s failure to satisfy the 

technical prong of the domestic industry 

requirement. The Commission requests 

briefing from the parties, interested 

government agencies, and interested 

persons on the issues of remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding based on 

the schedule set forth below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robert Needham, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5468. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 

23, 2021, the Commission instituted this 

investigation based on a complaint filed 

on behalf of The NOCO Company of 

Glenwillow, Ohio (‘‘NOCO’’). 86 FR 

15496–98 (Mar. 23, 2021). The 

complaint, as supplemented and 

amended, alleges a violation of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 (‘‘section 

337’’), in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain portable 

battery jump starters and components 

thereof by reason of infringement of one 

or more of claims 1, 4, 11, 14, 18, 19, 

and 21 of U.S. Patent No. 9,007,015 

(‘‘the ’015 patent’’) and claims 1, 4–6, 

16, 19, 23, 24, 26, 29, and 30 of the ’024 

patent, and infringement of the ’656 and 

’749 marks. Id. at 15497. 

The notice of investigation named the 

following respondents: (1) Advance 

Auto Parts, Inc. of Raleigh, North 

Carolina; (2) Anker Technology (UK) 

Ltd. of Birmingham, United Kingdom; 

(3) Antigravity Batteries LLC of 

Gardena, California; (4) Arteck 

Electronic Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; 

(5) AutoZone, Inc. of Memphis, 

Tennessee; (6) Best Buy Co., Inc. of 

South Richfield, Minnesota; (7) Best 

Parts, Inc. of Memphis, Tennessee; (8) 

Clore Automotive, LLC of Lenexa, 

Kansas; (9) Deltran USA, LLC of 

DeLand, Florida; (10) Energen, Inc. of 

City of Industry, California; (11) FlyLink 

Tech Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; (12) 

Gooloo Technologies LLC and Shenzhen 

Gooloo E-Commerce Co., Ltd of 

Shenzhen, China; (13) Great Neck Saw 

Manufacturers, Inc. of Mineola, New 

York; (14) Guangdong Boltpower Energy 

Co., Ltd of Shenzhen City, China; (15) 

Halo2Cloud, LLC of Hartford, 

Connecticut; (16) Horizon Tool, Inc. of 

Greensboro, North Carolina; (17) K-Tool 

International of Plymouth, Michigan; 

(18) Lowe’s Companies, Inc. of 

Mooresville, North Carolina; (19) Matco 

Tools Corporation of Stow, Ohio; (20) 

MonoPrice, Inc. of Brea, California; (21) 

National Automotive Parts Association, 

LLC (d/b/a NAPA) of Atlanta, Georgia; 

(22) Nekteck, Inc. of Anaheim, 

California; (23) O’Reilly Automotive, 

Inc. of Springfield, Missouri; (24) Paris 

Corporation of Westampton, New Jersey; 

(25) PowerMax Battery (U.S.A.), Inc. of 

Ontario, California; (26) Prime Global 

Products, Inc. of Ball Ground, Georgia; 

(27) QVC, Inc. of West Chester, 

Pennsylvania; (28) Schumacher Power 

Technology Ltd. of Yancheng, China; 

(29) Schumacher Electric Corp. of 

Mount Prospect, Illinois; (30) Shenzhen 

Carku Technology Co., Ltd. of 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40549 

Shenzhen, China; (31) Shenzhen 

Dingjiang Technology Co., Ltd. of 

Shenzhen, China; (32) Shenzhen 

Jieruijia Technology Co. Ltd. of Gong 

Ming, China; (33) Shenzhen Mediatek 

Tong Technology Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, 

China; (34) Shenzhen Take Tools Co., 

Ltd. of Shenzhen, China; (35) Shenzhen 

Topdon Technology Co., Ltd. of 

Shenzhen, China; (36) Shenzhen 

Valuelink E-Commerce Co., Ltd. of 

Shenzhen, China; (37) Smartech 

Products, Inc. of Savage, Maryland; (38) 

ThiEYE Technologies Co., Ltd. of 

Longgang, China; (39) Tii Trading Inc. of 

Baldwin Park, California; (40) Walmart 

Inc. of Bentonville, Arkansas; (41) 

Winplus North America, Inc. of Costa 

Mesa, California; (42) Zagg Co. Rrd Gst 

of Plainfield, Indiana; (43) Zhejiang 

Quingyou Electronic Commerce Co., 

Ltd. of Hangzhou, China; and (44) 70mai 

Co., Ltd. of Shanghai, China. Id. at 

15497–98. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations is a party to the 

investigation. Id. at 15498. 

The Commission permitted NOCO to 

amend the amended complaint and 

notice of investigation to make the 

following changes: (1) to substitute 

Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC, for Lowe’s 

Companies, Inc.; (2) to substitute 

O’Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc., 

O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, LLC, and 

Ozark Purchasing, LLC, for O’Reilly 

Automotive, Inc.; (3) to substitute Anker 

Innovations Ltd. (HK) for Anker 

Technology (UK) Ltd.; (4) to substitute 

ZAGG Inc. for Zagg Co. Rrd; (5) to 

substitute Shenzhen Dingjiang 

Technology Co., Ltd. (d/b/a Shenzhen 

Topdon Technology Co., Ltd. and 

Topdon Technology Co., Ltd.) for 

Shenzhen Dingjiang Technology Co., 

Ltd., and Shenzhen Topdon Technology 

Co., Ltd.; and (6) to add additional 

respondents related to Winplus North 

America, Inc.—ADC Solutions Auto, 

LLC d/b/a/Type-S and Winplus NA, 

LLC. Order No. 13 (Apr. 23, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (May 18, 

2021). 

The Commission subsequently 

terminated the investigation with 

respect to National Automotive Parts 

Association, LLC (d/b/a NAPA), 

Shenzhen Jieruijia Technology Co., Ltd., 

and Shenzhen Take Tools Co., Ltd. 

based on a voluntary withdrawal of the 

complaint. Order No. 9 (Apr. 13, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (May 12, 

2021); Order No. 47 (Dec. 6, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Jan. 4, 

2022). The Commission also 

subsequently terminated the 

investigation based on a settlement 

agreement with respect to the following 

respondents: Advance Auto Parts, Inc.; 

Lowe’s Home Centers, LLC; Ozark 

Purchasing, LLC; O’Reilly Automotive 

Stores, Inc.; O’Reilly Auto Enterprises, 

LLC; Shenzhen Dingjiang Technology 

Co., Ltd. (d/b/a Shenzhen Topdon 

Technology Co., Ltd. and Topdon 

Technology Co., Ltd.); Walmart, Inc.; 

QVC, Inc.; AutoZone, Inc.; and Best 

Parts, Inc. Order No. 11 (Apr. 19, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (May 4, 

2021); Order No. 14 (Apr. 23, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (May 18, 

2021); Order No. 21 (Jul. 7, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Jul. 26, 

2021); Order No. 31 (Sept. 20, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Oct. 12, 

2021); Order No. 35 (Oct. 20, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Nov. 22, 

2021); Order No. 44 (Nov. 15, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Dec. 6, 

2021). Finally, the Commission 

terminated the investigation with 

respect to Schumacher Electric Corp. 

and Schumacher Power Technology Ltd. 

based on a consent order stipulation and 

entry of a consent order. Order No. 52 

(Jan. 12, 2022), unreviewed by Comm’n 

Notice (Feb. 4, 2022). 

The Commission found several 

respondents in default for failing to 

respond to the complaint, notice of 

investigation, and order to show cause 

why they should not be found in 

default. The defaulting respondents 

include the following: Energen, Inc.; 

FlyLink Tech Co., Ltd.; K-Tool 

International; MonoPrice, Inc.; Prime 

Global Products, Inc.; Mediatek; 

Shenzhen Valuelink E-Commerce Co., 

Ltd.; ThiEYE Technologies Co., Ltd; Tii 

Trading Inc.; Zhejiang Quingyou; and 

Arteck Electronics Co., Ltd. Order No. 

23 (Jul. 13, 2021), unreviewed by 

Comm’n Notice (Jul. 30, 2021); Order 

No. 45 (Nov. 16, 2021), unreviewed by 

Comm’n Notice (Dec. 10, 2021). The 

Commission also found Smartech 

Products, Inc. in default based on its 

voluntary default. Order No. 28 (Aug. 9, 

2021), unreviewed by Comm’n Notice 

(Aug. 20, 2021). 

Accordingly, at the time of the 

evidentiary hearing, the following 

respondents remained active in the 

investigation: Antigravity Batteries LLC, 

Gooloo Technology LLC and Shenzhen 

Gooloo E-Commerce Co., Ltd., Horizon 

Tool, Inc., Nekteck, Inc., PowerMax 

Battery (U.S.A.), Inc., Shenzhen Carku 

Technology Co., Ltd., 70mai Co., Ltd., 

Matco Tools Corporation, Paris 

Corporation, and Great Neck Saw 

Manufacturers, Inc. (collectively, the 

‘‘Carku respondents’’); Guangdong 

Boltpower Energy Co., Ltd. and Best 

Buy Co., Inc. (collectively, the 

‘‘Boltpower respondents’’); and Winplus 

North America, Inc., Winplus NA, LLC, 

and ADC Solutions Auto, LLC d/b/a 

Type S (collectively, the ‘‘Winplus 

respondents’’). 

The Commission also subsequently 

terminated the investigation with 

respect to claims 4, 14, 18, and 21 of the 

’015 patent and claims 4, 5, 6, 19, 23, 

and 26 of the ’024 patent based on 

NOCO’s partial withdrawal of the 

complaint. Order No. 27 (Aug. 6, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Aug. 18, 

2021). The Commission later terminated 

the investigation with respect to the 

’015 patent in its entirety. Order No. 46 

(Dec. 6, 2021), unreviewed by Comm’n 

Notice (Jan. 4, 2022). 

Accordingly, at the time of the 

evidentiary hearing, the ’656 mark, the 

’749 mark, and claims 1, 16, 24, 29, and 

30 of the ’024 patent remained asserted 

in the investigation. Specifically, NOCO 

asserted the following: claims 1, 16, 24, 

29, and 30 of the ’024 patent against the 

Carku respondents; claims 1, 16, 24, 29, 

and 30 against the Boltpower 

respondents; claims 1, 16, 29, and 30 

against the Winplus respondents; and 

claims 1, 29, and 30 against ten of the 

twelve defaulting respondents. Final ID 

at 8–9. NOCO also accused defaulting 

respondent Mediatek of infringing the 

’749 mark and defaulting respondent 

Zhejiang Quingyou of infringing the 

’749 mark and the ’656 mark. Id. at 338. 

NOCO’s post-hearing brief omits 

infringement allegations against 

defaulting respondents FlyLink Tech 

Co., Ltd. and Arteck Electronics Co., 

Ltd. See CIB at 71–72, 183; Final ID at 

8–9, 338. 

The ALJ issued a Markman Order on 

November 5, 2021. Order No. 41 (Nov. 

5, 2021) (‘‘Markman Order’’). The ALJ 

held an evidentiary hearing on January 

11–14, 2022. 

On April 29, 2022, the ALJ issued the 

Final ID finding a violation with respect 

to the ’749 mark by defaulting 

respondent Mediatek and with respect 

to the ’656 and ’749 marks by defaulting 

respondent Zhejiang Quingyou, and 

finding no violation with respect to the 

’024 patent. Specifically, with respect to 

the ’024 patent, the ID finds that NOCO 

showed that the products of the 

Boltpower respondents and the ten 

defaulting respondents infringe the 

asserted claims of the ’024 patent, but 

that NOCO failed to show that the 

products of the Carku respondents and 

Winplus respondents infringe the 

asserted claims. The ID further finds 

that no asserted claim of the ’024 patent 

was shown to be invalid or 

unenforceable. Additionally, the ID 

finds that NOCO satisfied the economic 

prong of the domestic industry 

requirement but failed to satisfy the 

technical prong of the domestic industry 

requirement as to the ’024 patent. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
40550 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

The ALJ’s recommended 

determination on remedy and bonding 

recommended that if the Commission 

finds a violation of section 337 with 

respect to the ’024 patent, then the 

Commission should issue a GEO with 

respect to the ’024 patent and CDOs 

against all respondents shown to 

maintain commercially significant 

amounts of domestic inventory— 

Winplus, Carku, Antigravity, the Gooloo 

respondents, Great Neck, Matco Tools, 

Nekteck, PowerMax, 70Mai, Horizon 

Tool, Paris Corporation, Boltpower, and 

BestBuy. The ALJ also recommends that 

the Commission issue an LEO against 

Mediatek regarding the ’749 mark, and 

against Zhejiang Quingyou regarding the 

’749 mark and the ’656 mark. The ALJ 

finally recommends that the 

Commission set the bond rate at 100 

percent of entered value based on the 

difficulty of setting the bond based on 

a price differential due to the large 

number of respondents and the lack of 

evidence of a reasonably royalty rate. 

The Commission did not receive any 

submissions regarding the ALJ’s 

recommended determination pursuant 

to the Commission’s post RD-notice (87 

FR 29177–78 (May 12, 2022)) or 

Commission Rule 210.50(a)(4) (19 CFR 

210.50(a)(4)). 

On May 13, 2022, NOCO filed a 

petition with respect to the ’024 patent, 

seeking review of certain of the Final 

ID’s findings on the technical prong of 

the domestic industry requirement and 

infringement and seeking contingent 

review of certain of the Final ID’s 

findings on invalidity. That same day, 

Boltpower filed a petition seeking 

review of certain of the ALJ’s and ID’s 

findings on claim construction and 

infringement with respect to the ’024 

patent. Also on May 13, 2022, the Carku 

and Winplus respondents filed a joint 

contingent petition with respect to the 

’024 patent, seeking review of the Final 

ID on numerous issues related to 

infringement, invalidity, the technical 

prong of the domestic industry 

requirement, and the economic prong of 

the domestic industry requirement. No 

petitions were filed concerning the 

Final ID’s findings with respect to the 

asserted trademarks. On May 23, 2022, 

the parties and OUII filed responses to 

each other’s petitions. 

Having examined the record of this 

investigation, including the ALJ’s Final 

ID, the petitions for review, and the 

responses thereto, the Commission 

determined not to review the Final ID’s 

finding of a violation of section 337 

respect to the ’656 mark and the ’749 

mark by defaulting respondent Zhejiang 

Quingyou and with respect to the ’749 

mark by defaulting respondent 

Mediatek. The Commission presumes 

that the allegations in the second 

amended complaint against Zhejiang 

Quingyou and Mediatek are true with 

respect to the ’656 and ’749 marks based 

on those respondents’ defaults, 

including the allegations regarding the 

satisfaction of the economic prong of the 

domestic industry requirement against 

those respondents. 19 U.S.C. 1337(g)(1). 

The Commission has determined to 

review in part the Final ID’s finding of 

no violation of section 337 with respect 

to the ’024 patent and, on review to 

affirm the Final ID’s finding of no 

violation due to NOCO’s failure to 

satisfy the technical prong of the 

domestic industry requirement. The 

Commission further has determined to 

take no position on the Final ID’s 

findings that: (1) the accused Boltpower 

Schumacher SL1315 satisfies the 

limitation ‘‘the reverse polarity sensor 

configured . . . to provide an output 

signal indicating that the positive and 

negative polarity terminals of the 

vehicle battery are properly connected 

to the positive and negative polarity 

vehicle battery connectors’’ recited in 

the asserted claims of the ’024 patent; 

(2) any accused product or domestic 

industry product satisfies the limitation 

‘‘a power switch connected between the 

power supply and the positive and 

negative polarity vehicle battery 

terminal connectors’’ recited in the 

asserted claims of the ’024 patent; (3) 

the Winplus products satisfy the ‘‘turn 

off’’ limitation recited in the asserted 

claims of the ’024 patent; (4) claims 1 

and 29 of the ’024 patent are not invalid 

for a lack of written description; (5) 

claims 1, 24, 29, and 30 of the ’024 

patent are not rendered invalid as 

obvious by U.S. Patent Application 

Publication No. US 2013–0154543 

(‘‘Richardson’’) (RX–0049); (6) claim 16 

of the ’024 patent is not rendered 

obvious by Richardson in view of 

Chinese Pat. App. No. TW M417714U1 

(‘‘Luo’’) (RX–0048); (7) claim 16 of the 

’024 patent is not rendered obvious by 

Richardson in view of the asserted prior 

art E-Power 10 device (RPX–0047); (8) 

U.S. Patent No. 7,345,450 (‘‘Krieger’’) 

(RX–0047) does not anticipate claims 1, 

29, and 30 of the ’024 patent; does not 

render obvious claim 16; (9) claim 16 of 

the ’024 patent is not rendered obvious 

by Krieger in view of Luo or the Epower 10 device; (10) claim 16 of the 

’024 patent is not rendered obvious by 

Krieger in view of Richardson; (11) the 

asserted domestic industry products 

satisfy the ‘‘power switch’’ limitation 

recited in the asserted claims of the ’024 

patent; and (12) NOCO has satisfied the 

economic prong of the domestic 

industry requirement. Beloit Corp. v. 

Valmet Oy, 742 F.2d 1421, 1423 (Fed. 

Cir. 1984). The Commission has 

determined not to review the remainder 

of the Final ID with respect to the ’024 

patent. 

In connection with the final 

disposition of this investigation, the 

statute authorizes issuance of, inter alia 

(1) an exclusion order that could result 

in the exclusion of the subject articles 

from entry into the United States, and/ 

or (2) cease and desist orders that could 

result in the respondents being required 

to cease and desist from engaging in 

unfair acts in the importation and sale 

of such articles. Accordingly, the 

Commission is interested in receiving 

written submissions that address the 

form of remedy, if any, that should be 

ordered. If a party seeks exclusion of an 

article from entry into the United States 

for purposes other than entry for 

consumption, the party should so 

indicate and provide information 

establishing that activities involving 

other types of entry either are adversely 

affecting it or likely to do so. For 

background, see Certain Devices for 

Connecting Computers via Telephone 

Lines, Inv. No. 337–TA–360, USITC 

Pub. No. 2843, Comm’n Op. at 7–10 

(December 1994). 

The statute requires the Commission 

to consider the effects of that remedy 

upon the public interest. The public 

interest factors the Commission will 

consider include the effect that an 

exclusion order and/or a cease and 

desist order would have on (1) the 

public health and welfare, (2) 

competitive conditions in the U.S. 

economy, (3) U.S. production of articles 

that are like or directly competitive with 

those that are subject to investigation, 

and (4) U.S. consumers. The 

Commission is therefore interested in 

receiving written submissions that 

address the aforementioned public 

interest factors in the context of this 

investigation. 

If the Commission orders some form 

of remedy, the U.S. Trade 

Representative, as delegated by the 

President, has 60 days to approve, 

disapprove, or take no action on the 

Commission’s determination. See 

Presidential Memorandum of July 21, 

2005, 70 FR 43251 (July 26, 2005). 

During this period, the subject articles 

would be entitled to enter the United 

States under bond, in an amount 

determined by the Commission and 

prescribed by the Secretary of the 

Treasury. The Commission is therefore 

interested in receiving submissions 

concerning the amount of the bond that 

should be imposed if a remedy is 

ordered. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40551 

Written Submissions: Parties to the 

investigation, interested government 

agencies, and any other interested 

parties are encouraged to file written 

submissions on the issues of remedy, 

the public interest, and bonding. Such 

initial submissions should include 

views on the recommended 

determination by the ALJ on remedy 

and bonding, which issued on April 29, 

2022. 

The Commission further requests that 

NOCO submit proposed remedial 

orders, provide the HTSUS numbers 

under which the subject articles are 

imported, and supply a list of known 

importers of the subject article with its 

initial written submission. The written 

submissions, exclusive of any exhibits, 

must not exceed 10 pages, and must be 

filed no later than close of business on 

July 14, 2022. Reply submissions must 

not exceed 10 pages and must be filed 

no later than the close of business on 

July 21, 2021. No further submissions 

on these issues will be permitted unless 

otherwise ordered by the Commission. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above. The Commission’s paper 

filing requirements in 19 CFR 210.4(f) 

are currently waived. 85 FR 15798 

(March 19, 2020). Submissions should 

refer to the investigation number (Inv. 

No. 337–TA–1256) in a prominent place 

on the cover page and/or the first page. 

(See Handbook for Electronic Filing 

Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/ 

documents/handbook_on_filing_

procedures.pdf). Persons with questions 

regarding filing should contact the 

Secretary, (202) 205–2000. 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment by marking each document 

with a header indicating that the 

document contains confidential 

information. This marking will be 

deemed to satisfy the request procedure 

set forth in Rules 201.6(b) and 

210.5(e)(2) (19 CFR 201.6(b) & 

210.5(e)(2)). Documents for which 

confidential treatment by the 

Commission is properly sought will be 

treated accordingly. A redacted nonconfidential version of the document 

must also be filed simultaneously with 

any confidential filing. All information, 

including confidential business 

information and documents for which 

confidential treatment is properly 

sought, submitted to the Commission for 

purposes of this investigation may be 

disclosed to and used: (i) by the 

Commission, its employees and Offices, 

and contract personnel (a) for 

developing or maintaining the records 

of this or a related proceeding, or (b) in 

internal investigations, audits, reviews, 

and evaluations relating to the 

programs, personnel, and operations of 

the Commission including under 5 

U.S.C. Appendix 3; or (ii) by U.S. 

government employees and contract 

personnel, solely for cybersecurity 

purposes. All contract personnel will 

sign appropriate nondisclosure 

agreements. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection on EDIS. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on June 30, 

2022. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 30, 2022. 

Katherine Hiner, 

Acting Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14407 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number: 1121–0352] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Reinstatement 

Without Change, of a Previously 

Approved Collection 

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs, 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Justice 

Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, 

Department of Justice, is submitting the 

following information collection request 

to the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) for review and approval in 

accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: The Department of Justice 

encourages public comment and will 

accept input until August 8, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ 

PRAMain. Find this particular 

information collection by selecting 

‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open 

for Public Comments’’ or by using the 

search function. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Bureau of Justice 

Assistance, including whether the 

information will have practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Reinstatement without change, of a 

previously approved collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

National Standards to Prevent, Detect, 

and Respond to Prison Rape (28 CFR 

part 115). 

3. The agency form number: There is 

no form number associated with this 

information collection. The applicable 

component within the Department of 

Justice is the Bureau of Justice 

Assistance, in the Office of Justice 

Programs. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: On June 20, 2012, the 

Department of Justice published a Final 

Rule to adopt national standards to 

prevent, detect, and respond to sexual 

abuse in confinement settings pursuant 

to the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 

2003 (PREA), 34 U.S.C. 30305. These 

national standards, which went into 

effect on August 20, 2012, require 

covered facilities to retain certain 

specified information relating to sexual 

abuse prevention planning, responsive 

planning, education and training, 

investigations and to collect and retain 

certain specified information relating to 

allegations of sexual abuse within the 

facility. Covered facilities include: 

federal, state, and local jails, prisons, 

lockups, community correction 

facilities, and juvenile facilities, 

whether administered by such 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES