40576 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

1This decision embraces: Docket No. FD 36500 

(Sub-No. 1), Illinois Central Railroad—Acquisition 

of a Line of Railroad Between Kansas City, Mo., & 

Springfield & East St. Louis, Ill.—Kansas City 

Southern Railway; Docket No. FD 36500 (Sub-No. 

2), Illinois Central Railroad—Trackage Rights 

Between Airline Junction, Mo., & Grandview, Mo.— 

Kansas City Southern Railway; Docket No. FD 

36500 (Sub-No. 3), Canadian National Railway— 

Control—Gateway Eastern Railway; Docket No. FD 

36500 (Sub-No. 4), Illinois Central Railroad— 

Assignment of KCS Trackage Rights Between Rock 

Creek Junction, Mo., & Airline Junction, Mo.— 

Union Pacific Railroad; and Docket No. FD 36500 

(Sub-No. 5), Norfolk Southern Railway—Trackage 

Rights—Kansas City Southern. 

servicing agent. The agreement is 

primarily used by the certified 

development company as the loan 

servicing agent and acknowledges the 

imposition of various fees allowed in 

SBA’s 504 loan program. 

Solicitation of Public Comments 

Comments may be submitted on (a) 

whether the collection of information is 

necessary for the agency to properly 

perform its functions; (b) whether the 

burden estimates are accurate; (c) 

whether there are ways to minimize the 

burden, including through the use of 

automated techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and (d) whether 

there are ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information. 

Summary of Information Collection 

OMB Control Number: 3245–0193. 

Title: Servicing Agent Agreement. 

Description of Respondents: SBA 

Borrowers. 

Form Number: SBA Form 1506. 

Total Estimated Annual Responses: 

7,631. 

Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 

7,631. 

Curtis Rich, 

Agency Clearance Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14410 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8026–09–P 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD 

[Docket No. FD 36500] 

Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, 

Canadian Pacific Railway Company; 

Soo Line Railroad Company; Central 

Maine & Quebec Railway US INC.; 

Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad 

Corporation; and Delaware & Hudson 

Railway Company, Inc.—Control— 

Kansas City Southern; The Kansas 

City Southern Railway Company; 

Gateway Eastern Railway Company; 

and The Texas Mexican Railway 

Company 

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board. 

ACTION: Decision No. FD 36500; notice 

of acceptance of responsive 

applications. 

SUMMARY: The Surface Transportation 

Board (Board) is accepting for 

consideration the responsive 

applications filed by Canadian National 

Railway Company (CNR) and its rail 

carrier affiliate, Illinois Central Railroad 

Company (ICRR) (collectively, CN), on 

February 28, 2022, and amended on 

June 9, 2022, in Docket Nos. FD 36500 

(Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 

36500 (Sub-No. 3), and FD 36500 (SubNo. 4); and by Norfolk Southern 

Railway Company (NSR), on February 

28, 2022, and amended on June 9, 2022, 

in Docket No. FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5). 

The responsive applications relate to the 

primary application filed October 29, 

2021, by Canadian Pacific Railway 

Limited (Canadian Pacific), Canadian 

Pacific Railway Company, and their 

U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries, Soo Line 

Railroad Company, Central Maine & 

Quebec Railway US Inc., Dakota, 

Minnesota & Eastern Railroad 

Corporation, and Delaware & Hudson 

Railway Company, Inc. (collectively, 

CP) and Kansas City Southern and its 

U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries, The Kansas 

City Southern Railway Company 

(KCSR), Gateway Eastern Railway 

Company, and The Texas Mexican 

Railway Company (collectively, KCS) 

(CP and KCS collectively, Applicants). 

DATES: The effective date of this 

decision is July 1, 2022. Comments 

regarding the responsive filings must be 

filed with the Board by July 12, 2022. 

Rebuttal in support of the responsive 

filings must be filed with the Board by 

August 11, 2022. Briefs must be filed 

with the Board by September 20, 2022. 

ADDRESSES: Any filing submitted in this 

proceeding must be filed with the 

Surface Transportation Board either via 

e-filing on the Board’s website or in 

writing addressed to 395 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20423–0001. In 

addition, one copy of each filing must 

be sent (and may be sent by email only 

if service by email is acceptable to the 

recipient) to each of the following: (1) 

Secretary of Transportation, 1200 New 

Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 

20590; (2) Attorney General of the 

United States, c/o Assistant Attorney 

General, Antitrust Division, Room 3109, 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20530; (3) CP’s representative, David L. 

Meyer, Law Office of David L. Meyer, 

1105 S Street NW, Washington, DC 

20009; (4) KCS’s representative, William 

A. Mullins, Baker & Miller PLLC, Suite 

300, 2401 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 

Washington, DC 20037; (5) any other 

person designated as a Party of Record 

on the service list in the primary Docket 

No. FD 36500 1; and (6) the 

administrative law judge assigned in 

this proceeding, the Hon. Thomas 

McCarthy, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20004–1710, and 

at ctolbert@fmshrc.gov and zbyers@

fmshrc.gov. 

In addition, one copy of all comments 

filed in these proceedings must be 

served on the responsive applicants’ 

representatives: Raymond A. Atkins, 

Sidley Austin LLP, 1501 K Street NW, 

Washington, DC 20005 (representing 

CN); and Carrie Mahan, Weil, Gotshal & 

Manges LLP, 2001 M Street NW, Suite 

600, Washington, DC 20036 

(representing NSR). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Valerie Quinn at (202) 245–0283. 

Assistance for the hearing impaired is 

available through the Federal Relay 

Service at (800) 877–8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: By 

application filed with the Board on 

October 29, 2021, the primary 

applicants seek approval and 

authorization under 49 U.S.C. 11321–26 

for a proposed transaction that involves 

the acquisition of control by Canadian 

Pacific, through its indirect, wholly 

owned subsidiary Cygnus Merger Sub 2 

Corp., of Kansas City Southern, and 

through it, of KCSR and its railroad 

affiliates, and for the resulting common 

control by Canadian Pacific of its U.S. 

railroad subsidiaries, and KCSR and its 

railroad affiliates (Transaction). In 

Decision No. 11, served November 23, 

2021, and published in the Federal 

Register on November 26, 2021 (86 FR 

67,571), the Board accepted for 

consideration the control application 

(Application) filed in this docket and 

established a procedural schedule for 

the proceeding. Canadian Pac. Ry.— 

Control—Kan. City S., FD 36500 (STB 

served Nov. 23, 2021). 

CN and NSR filed their respective 

responsive applications on February 28, 

2022. On March 16, 2022, the Board 

suspended the procedural schedule and 

directed Applicants to address an 

apparent inconsistency in certain data 

they had submitted. Canadian Pac. 

Ry.—Control—Kan. City S., FD 36500 et 

al., slip op. at 3 (STB served Mar. 16, 

2022). Thereafter, on April 27, 2022, the 

Board directed Applicants to amend 

their Application to further explain and 

support the analysis underlying the 

Application’s Operating Plan, as well as 

address technical issues with the 

workpapers associated with the 

Operating Plan. Canadian Pac. Ry.— 

Control—Kan. City S. (Decision No. 17), 

FD 36500 et al., slip op. at 5–6 (STB 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 40577 

2 In Decision No. 17, FD 36500 et al., the Board 

stated that the procedural schedule would resume 

upon the filing of amended comments and 

responsive applications. Decision No. 17, FD 36500 

et al., slip op. at 7. Pursuant to the revised 

procedural schedule served on May 27, 2022, 

amended comments and responsive applications 

were due by June 9, 2022. Canadian Pac. Ry.— 

Control—Kan. City S., FD 36500 et al., slip op. at 

3 (STB served May. 27, 2022). 

3The Springfield Line consists of the following 

lines: (1) the line from milepost 192.4 at Cockrell 

(Springfield), Ill., through milepost 482.0 at Rock 

Creek Jct. (Kansas City), Mo. (milepost equation at 

Murrayville, Ill., where milepost 221.7=milepost 

226.7); (2) the line from milepost 68.2 at 

Roodhouse, Ill. (milepost 237.2 on the first segment) 

through milepost 287.2 at Church (East St. Louis), 

Ill., including KCS’s interest in the Union Pacific 

Railroad Company (UP)/KCS Joint Facility between 

Godfrey, Ill., and Church (milepost equation at 

Godfrey where milepost 28.0=milepost 252.1); (3) 

the Jacksonville Branch from milepost 226.7 at 

Murrayville to milepost 216.3 at Jacksonville, Ill.; 

and (4) KCS’s interest as lessor in the Fulton Branch 

from milepost 0.0 to milepost 3.0 at Mexico, Mo., 

leased to Ozark Valley Railroad, Inc. (CN Amended 

Responsive Appl. 6–7.) 

4CN states that, upon approval of the 

applications in the Sub-Nos. 1 and 3 dockets, ICRR 

will file a notice of intra-corporate family 

transaction pursuant to which ICRR will acquire 

trackage rights over GWER (i) between GWER’s 

milepost 238.7 at or near Q Tower and GWER’s 

milepost 236.8 at or near Willows in East St. Louis, 

(ii) between GWER’s milepost 2.3 at or near Wann 

in East Alton, Ill., and GWER’s milepost 0.91 at or 

near Olin Brass in East Alton, and (iii) from GWER’s 

milepost 265.01 at or near Roxana in Wood River, 

Ill., ‘‘to the change in ownership in the track with 

Shell Oil Company.’’ (CN Amended Responsive 

Appl. 7–8.) 

5Specifically, ICRR seeks the assignment of KCS’s 

trackage rights agreement with UP relating to the 

1.4-mile UP line, between milepost 276.8 at Rock 

Creek Junction and approximately milepost 278.2, 

in the vicinity of Airline Junction in Kansas City, 

Mo. (CN Amended Responsive Appl. 23.) 

6While CN asserts that its responsive application 

should be classified as a minor transaction, it 

submitted all the information required for 

significant transactions in both its original and 

amended responsive applications. 

7Meridian Speedway is a line owned by Meridian 

Speedway, LLC (MSLLC), connecting Meridian, 

Miss., and Shreveport, La. NSR states that KCS and 

NSR are the sole members of MSLLC. 

8NSR states that its option to purchase the Wylie 

Intermodal Terminal would become exercisable 

during a ‘‘Notice Trigger Period,’’ which is assumed 

to begin in May 2024 pursuant to an agreement with 

KCS. (NSR Amended Responsive Appl. 8.) See KCS 

Notice of Exemption, Ex. J, Dallas Terminal 

Marketing Agreement, Jan. 17, 2006, Kan. City S.— 

Exemption for Transactions Within a Corp. Fam., 

FD 34822. 

9See KCS Notice of Exemption, Ex. C, NSR– 

MSLLC Joint Use Agreement, Jan. 17, 2006, Kan. 

City S.—Exemption for Transactions Within a Corp. 

Fam., FD 34822. NSR states that the same 

contingent trackage rights for the same category of 

intermodal traffic, subject to the same service 

disruption trigger, apply to its traffic on the 

Meridian Speedway. (NSR Amended Responsive 

Appl. 9.) 

10On June 22, 2022, Bartlett Grain Co., LP, filed 

a comment in support of the primary Transaction 

and urging the Board to reject CN’s application to 

divest the Springfield Line. 

served Apr. 27, 2022). Applicants filed 

an amended Operating Plan, including 

amended workpapers, on May 13, 2022, 

and an errata on May 20, 2022. On June 

9, 2022, CN and NSR filed their 

respective amended responsive 

applications.2

Responsive Filings: Conditions 

Requested. In Docket Nos. FD 36500 

(Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 

36500 (Sub-No. 3), and FD 36500 (SubNo. 4), CN seeks, as a condition to any 

approval of the Transaction, approval of 

ICRR’s acquisition of KCS’s line 

between Kansas City, Mo., and 

Springfield and East St. Louis, Ill. 

Specifically, in Docket No. FD 36500 

(Sub-No. 1), ICRR seeks approval for a 

line sale of KCS’s Springfield Line 3 to 

ICRR, as a condition on any merger 

approval. (CN Amended Responsive 

Appl. 6–7.) In connection with the line 

acquisition, ICRR also seeks acquisition 

of an 8.33% ownership share of Kansas 

City Terminal Railway Company (KCT), 

which would enable ICRR to operate 

over KCT-controlled trackage in Kansas 

City, and a 50% ownership interest in 

KCS’s International Freight Gateway 

terminal (IFG Terminal) south of Kansas 

City. (Id. at 7.) 

In Docket No. FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), 

ICRR seeks overhead trackage rights on 

KCS’s Pittsburg Subdivision, between 

milepost 5.6± at Airline Junction in 

Kansas City, and milepost 29.5± near 

Grandview, Mo., to reach the IFG 

Terminal (in which ICRR would acquire 

a 50% ownership interest as part of the 

transaction in Docket No. FD 36500 

(Sub-No.1)). (Id. at 7, 22–23.) In Docket 

No. FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), CNR and 

ICRR seek authority to control by 

acquiring KCS’s equity interest in the 

Gateway Eastern Railway Company 

(GWER), a KCS subsidiary that owns 

segments of the Springfield Line located 

in the East St. Louis terminal area.4 (Id. 

at 7–8.) In Docket No. FD 36500 (SubNo. 4), ICRR seeks acquisition by 

assignment of KCS’s trackage rights over 

UP between Rock Creek Junction and 

Airline Junction, which enable KCS 

(and would enable ICRR) to reach the 

joint agency at Knoche Yard and the IFG 

Terminal from the Springfield Line.5

(Id. at 5, 8, 23.) CN states that, to the 

extent those trackage rights are not 

assignable, ICRR requests that the Board 

override the assignment provision. (Id. 

at 8.) 

CN asserts that its responsive 

application should be classified as a 

minor transaction because the proposed 

divestiture transaction ‘‘clearly will not 

have any anticompetitive effects.’’ 6 (Id. 

at 4.) CN contends that the divestiture 

would be procompetitive, as no shipper 

would lose transportation options, and 

many customers would gain 

transportation options, as ICRR would 

give CP–KCS haulage access to all 

current and future customers on the 

Springfield Line. (Id.) 

In Docket No. FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5), 

as a condition to any Board approval of 

the proposed Transaction, NSR seeks 

certain contingent trackage rights for 

overhead movement on KCS’s line, 

between the connection of KCS with the 

Meridian Speedway,7 at Shreveport, La., 

at or near milepost V–169.85, and the 

Wylie Intermodal Terminal, in Wylie, 

Tex., at or near milepost T–197.8. (NSR 

Amended Responsive Appl. 4, 9.) NSR 

states that the contingent trackage rights 

would apply only to intermodal traffic 

originating or terminating at the Wylie 

Intermodal Terminal. (Id. at 4.) NSR 

further notes that these trackage rights 

would only be exercisable after NSR 

purchases the Wylie Intermodal 

Terminal, pursuant to the terms of the 

Dallas Terminal Marketing Agreement,8

and in the event of a ‘‘Major Service 

Standard Failure,’’ as defined under the 

NSR–MSLLC Joint Use Agreement.9 (Id. 

at. 8–9; see also NSR Amended 

Comment 46–47.) NSR requests that its 

responsive application be treated as a 

minor transaction under 49 CFR 

1180.2(c), because the contingent 

trackage rights ‘‘clearly would not have 

any anticompetitive effects.’’ (NSR 

Amended Responsive Appl. 5–6.) 

Rather, NSR maintains that, in 

requesting the contingent trackage 

rights, it seeks to maintain existing 

routes that intermodal shippers utilize 

today and to mitigate the potential harm 

that may flow from the primary 

Transaction. (Id. at 6.) 

On March 22, 2022, CSX 

Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), filed a 

motion to reject NSR’s responsive 

application, asserting that the 

responsive application is not a minor 

transaction and does not address ‘‘the 

significant potential competitive harms 

that would come from extending NSR’s 

exclusive rights over the Meridian 

Speedway to NSR’s Wylie Intermodal 

Traffic, should NSR exercise its option 

to purchase the Wylie Intermodal 

Terminal.’’ (CSXT Motion 2.) CSXT also 

argues that NSR did not provide all the 

information required for a minor 

transaction. On March 29, 2022, NSR 

replied, asserting that its responsive 

application was properly filed as a 

minor transaction and that it had 

provided all of the information required 

for a minor transaction. In its amended 

responsive application, NSR maintains 

that its responsive application is 

complete and further addresses CSXT’s 

allegations.10

Responsive Filings Accepted. The 

Board finds the responsive applications 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
40578 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 129 / Thursday, July 7, 2022 / Notices 

11The Board notes that NSR amended its 

responsive application to address the criticisms 

raised by CSXT. As discussed, the Board finds the 

amended responsive application to be in substantial 

compliance with the applicable regulations. 

12Based on the environmental information 

submitted by CN regarding its responsive 

application, it appears that the thresholds triggering 

an environmental review under the Board’s 

regulations at 49 CFR 1105.6(b)(4) and 1105.7(e)(5) 

would be reached or exceeded. Therefore, the 

Board’s Office of Environmental Analysis (OEA) 

will conduct an environmental and historic review 

of CN’s responsive application that will be separate 

from, but conducted concurrently with, OEA’s 

ongoing environmental and historic review of the 

Transaction. NSR’s responsive application seeking 

trackage rights is categorically excluded from 

environmental and historic review under 49 CFR 

1105.6(c)(3) and 1105.8(b)(3). 

13This is consistent with another regulatory 

provision that appears to recognize that a minor/ 

significant determination will not be required for 

every responsive application. See 49 CFR 

1180.4(d)(4)(v) (‘‘Each responsive application filed 

and accepted (if required) is considered 

consolidated with the primary application.’’) 

14As the Board has previously explained, the 

definition of ‘‘minor’’ and ‘‘significant’’ transaction 

set out in 49 CFR 1180.2 is tied to the substantive 

approval standard at 49 U.S.C. 11324(d). See 

Decision No. 13, FD 36500 et al., slip op. at 3 n.5 

(citing R.R. Consol. Procs.: Definition of, & 

Requirements Applicable to, ‘‘Significant’’ 

Transactions, 9 I.C.C.2d 1198, 1199 (1993).) But 

whether the Board imposes the relief sought in a 

responsive application as a condition to this merger 

between two Class I railroads turns not on whether 

the proposed conditions meet the standard at 49 

U.S.C. 11324(d), but on whether they are justified 

and should be approved under the Board’s 

conditioning authority at 49 U.S.C. 11324(c). See 

Decision No. 13, FD 36500 et al., slip op. at 4 

(setting forth the criteria for imposing conditions to 

remedy competitive harm of the primary 

transaction). 

filed by CN and NSR to be in substantial 

compliance with the regulations under 

which they were filed 11 and finds no 

basis for rejecting them.12 The Board 

reserves the right to require 

supplemental information, if necessary. 

The Board further finds that it is not 

necessary to designate the proposed 

transactions as minor or significant. 

Although the agency has typically made 

such a determination for responsive 

applications, neither the statute nor the 

Board’s regulations require that such a 

determination be made for responsive 

applications that are not inconsistent 

with the primary application. Section 

11325 of title 49, which provides that 

control applications be published in the 

Federal Register with a determination 

of whether a merger is major, 

significant, or minor, (see 49 U.S.C. 

11325(a)), does require that inconsistent 

applications (a type of responsive 

application) and applications for 

inclusion in major mergers be filed 

within 90 days of the notice of the 

primary application, (see 49 U.S.C. 

11325(b)(2)), and the applicable merger 

regulations provide that responsive 

applications inconsistent with the 

primary application will be classified as 

major, significant, or minor, (see 49 CFR 

1180.4(d)(4)(ii)). But the regulations 

make no such reference with regard to 

responsive applications that are not 

inconsistent with the primary 

application.13 Although the Board 

previously indicated that it would 

classify the responsive applications 

filed in this proceeding as minor or 

significant, see Canadian Pac. Ry.— 

Control—Kan. City S. (Decision No. 13), 

FD 36500 et al., slip op. at 3–4 (STB 

served Feb. 18, 2022), based on the 

analysis discussed above, we now find 

that such a determination is not 

necessary.14 Notice of the responsive 

applications will be published in the 

Federal Register to ensure that all 

parties are aware of them. 

Access to Filings. Under the Board’s 

rules, any document filed with the 

Board (including applications, 

pleadings, etc.) shall be promptly 

furnished to interested persons on 

request, unless subject to a protective 

order. 49 CFR 1180.4(a)(3) (2000). The 

responsive applications and other 

filings in this proceeding will be 

furnished to interested persons upon 

request and will also be available on the 

Board’s website at www.stb.gov. In 

addition, the responsive filings may be 

obtained upon request from the 

responsive applicants’ representatives 

named above. 

Proceedings Consolidated. The 

responsive filings in Docket Nos. FD 

36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 

2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 

(Sub-No. 4), and FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5) 

are consolidated for disposition with the 

primary application in Docket No. FD 

36500. 

Comments may be Submitted. 

Interested persons may participate 

formally by submitting written 

comments regarding any or all of these 

responsive filings, subject to the service 

requirements specified above. Such 

comments must be filed with the Board 

by July 12, 2022. Comments must 

include the following: the commenter’s 

position in support of or in opposition 

to the transaction proposed in the 

responsive filing; any and all evidence, 

including verified statements, in 

support of or in opposition to the 

proposed transaction; and specific 

reasons why approval of the proposed 

transaction would or would not be in 

the public interest. 

Requests for Affirmative Relief will 

not be Accepted. Because the responsive 

applications accepted for consideration 

in this decision contain proposed 

conditions to approval of the primary 

application in Docket No. FD 36500, the 

Board will not entertain requests for 

affirmative relief with respect to these 

responsive applications. Parties may 

only participate in direct support of or 

in direct opposition to these responsive 

applications as filed. 

It is ordered: 

1. The responsive applications in 

Docket Nos. FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 

36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 

3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), and FD 36500 

(Sub-No. 5) are accepted for 

consideration and are consolidated for 

disposition with the primary 

application in Docket No. FD 36500. 

2. This decision is effective on its 

service date. 

By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, 

Hedlund, Oberman, Primus, and Schultz. 

Raina White, 

Clearance Clerk. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14503 Filed 7–6–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

[Docket No. FAA–2022–0363, Notice No. 63– 

22–01] 

Notice of Intent To Designate as 

Abandoned Emerald Enterprises LTD. 

Type Certificate No. A9WE 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of intent to designate 

Emerald Enterprises LTD. type 

certificate as abandoned; request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

FAA’s intent to designate Emerald 

Enterprises LTD. Type Certificate (TC) 

No. A9WE as abandoned and make the 

related engineering data available upon 

request. The FAA has received a request 

to provide engineering data concerning 

this TC. The FAA has been unsuccessful 

in contacting Emerald Enterprises LTD. 

concerning the TC. This action is 

intended to enhance aviation safety. 

DATES: The FAA must receive all 

comments by January 3, 2023. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments on 

this notice by any of the following 

methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Mail: Manuel Hernandez, AIR–792, 

Federal Aviation Administration, Los 

Angeles ACO Branch, 3960 Paramount 

Boulevard, Suite 100 Lakewood, CA 

90712–4137. 

• Email: Manuel.F.Hernandez@

faa.gov. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA– 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES