alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.2**

# **CERTIFICATIONBY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul B. Carousso, principal financialofficer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 11, 2006 | /s/ Paul B.  Carousso         |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------|
|                  | Paul B. Carousso              |
|                  | *Vice  President, Finance*    |
|                  | *(Chief  Accounting Officer)* |

 

This certification accompaniesthis Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shallnot except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and this certification will not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the registrant specificallyincorporates it by reference.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-5063

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TONY LEE EPPERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District

Judge. (CR-05-10)

Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: August 22, 2006

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick T. Heblich, Jr., FREDERICK T. HEBLICH, JR., PC,

Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. John L. Brownlee, United

States Attorney, William F. Gould, Assistant United States

Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*The guideline provision for obstruction of justice, like that

for perjury, has a base offense level of fourteen. See USSG

§§ 2J1.2(a); 2J1.3(a). Likewise, both provisions provide for a

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tony Lee Epperson pled guilty to one count of making a

false statement to a government official, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 1001 (2000). Epperson was assigned an offense level of fourteen,

criminal history category IV, and sentenced to thirty-three months’

imprisonment. On appeal, Epperson contends his sentence is

unreasonable as the district court improperly accepted the

probation officer’s recommendation to apply U.S. Sentencing

Guidelines Manual § 2J1.3(a) (2004). We affirm. 

 When reviewing the district court’s application of the

Sentencing Guidelines, we review findings of fact for clear error

and questions of law de novo. United States v. Green, 436 F.3d

449, 456 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2309 (2006). A

sentence is unreasonable if based on an error in construing or

applying the Sentencing Guidelines. Id. at 456-57.

At sentencing, rather than merely accepting the

recommendation of the probation officer, the district court deemed,

and Epperson conceded, that the obstruction of justice enhancement

authorized by USSG § 2J1.2 better reflected Epperson’s conduct.

However, even if the court had applied a perjury enhancement

pursuant to § 2J1.3, Epperson could not establish harm as the

guideline range remained unchanged.* Therefore, we conclude
three-level increase for substantial interference with the

administration of justice. See USSG §§ 2J1.2(b)(2); 2J1.3(b)(2).

- 3 -

Epperson’s thirty-three month sentence, which was within a properly

calculated guidelines range, is reasonable.

Accordingly, we affirm Epperson’s sentence. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Scientific Energy, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley Chan, President, CEO & CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|                                   | 
|---------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Stanley Chan                   | 
|Stanley Chan, President, CEO & CFO | 
|                                   | 



August 15, 2007
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                at and for the periods indicated. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August                7, 2006 | /s/                Robert E. Cauley    |   |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | Robert                E. Cauley        |
|                          | Chief                Financial Officer |
# **Exhibit 32.1**

# ** **

## **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

## ** **

                In connection with the Quarterly Report of BiminiMortgage Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey J. Zimmer, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| October 28, 2005 | /s/ JEFFREY J. ZIMMER     |
|------------------|---------------------------|
|             | Jeffrey J. Zimmer         |
|             | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

 

----
HARRIS-OFFUT v. NORTH CAROLINA BD. OF LICENSED PROFESSIONAL COUNSELORS.

No. COA04-1417.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #TA-17028)

Case reported without published opinion Affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of, and for, the periods presented in the                Report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                8, 2007 |   |  /s/                Jeffrey J.                Zimmer                                            Jeffrey                J. Zimmer Chairman                of the Board, President and                Chief Executive Officer |
|---------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal.

# SUMMARY:

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act of October 6, 1972, that the Safety and Occupational Health Study Section, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through June 30, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Joanne Fairbanks, Designated Federal Officer, Safety and Occupational Health Study Section, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1095 Willowdale Road, Mailstop L1119, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505; Telephone: (304) 285-6143; Email:                         *JFairbanks@cdc.gov.*

                        The Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Strategic Business Initiatives Unit, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2022-13687 Filed 6-27-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5083 

To extend the suspension of duty on Desmodur E 14. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2008 

Mr. TIM MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on Desmodur E 14. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESMODUR E 14. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.80 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 1,2,3-Propanetriol, polymer with 2,4-diisocyanato-1-meth7 ylbenzene, 2-ethyl-2-(hydroxymethyl))-1,3-propanediol, 

8 methyloxirane and oxirane) is amended by striking ‘‘12/ 

9 31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5083 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
Exhibit 23.2
**NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP**
     Section 11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “SecuritiesAct”), provides that if any part of a registration statement at the time suchpart becomes effective contains an untrue statement of a material fact or anomission to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary tomake the statements therein not misleading, any person acquiring a securitypursuant to such registration statement (unless it is proved that at the timeof such acquisition such person knew of such untruth or omission) may sue,among others, every accountant who has consented to be named as having preparedor certified any part of the registration statement, or as having prepared orcertified any report or valuation which is used in connection with theregistration statement, with respect to the statement in such registrationstatement, report or valuation which purports to have been prepared orcertified by the accountant.
     This Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference intoRegistration Statement File Nos. 333-34121, 333-35533 and 333-70317 on Form S-8(collectively, the “Registration Statements”) of Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(“Kos”). On March 6, 2002, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directorsdecided to no longer engage Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”) as Kos’independent accountants. See Kos’ Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 12,2002 for more information. After reasonable efforts, Kos has been unable toobtain Andersen’s written consent to the incorporation by reference into theRegistration Statements of its audit reports with respect to Kos’ financialstatements as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000.
     Under these circumstances, Rule 437a under the Securities Act permits Kosto file this Form 10-K without a written consent from Andersen. However, as aresult, with respect to transactions in Kos securities pursuant to theRegistration Statements that occur subsequent to the date this Annual Report onForm 10-K is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Andersen willnot have any liability under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any untruestatements of a material fact contained in the financial statements audited byAndersen or any omissions of a material fact required to be stated therein.Accordingly, you would be unable to assert a claim against Andersen underSection 11(a) of the Securities Act because it has not consented to theincorporation by reference of its previously issued reports into theRegistration Statements.
STATE v. WHITE

No. COA04-841

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed August 16, 2005

Certification Date September 6, 2005

Appeal from Wake (03CRS86377, 03CRS86378).

Cases reported without published opinion. No error in part, vacated in part and remanded for resentencing.
STATE of North Carolina v. Philip Ray DAWKINS, Jr.

No. 83P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Bruce T. Cunningham, Jr., Southern Pines, for Dawkins.

Ronald M. Marquette, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kenneth W. Honeycutt, District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: __ N.C.App. ___, 590 S.E.2d 324.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of February 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 1st day of April 2004."

Justice ORR recused.
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 29, 2015

No. 04-14-00776-CR

Bernardo Ibarra-LOPEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR2497

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is due May 27, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of April, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
In re A.N.B.

No. 428PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 21, 2005.

Charles W. Porter, Charlotte, for Mother.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th day of April 2005 by Respondent to Dismiss Appeal and Motion to Strike Brief and Appendix Memorandum of Law:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 21st day of April 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

   <ARTICLE> 5

     <S>                                   <C>
     <PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 12-MOS
     <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1996
     <PERIOD-END>                                             DEC-31-1996
     <CASH>                                                     1,979,493
     <SECURITIES>                                                       0
     <RECEIVABLES>                                             17,995,524
     <ALLOWANCES>                                               (611,170)
     <INVENTORY>                                               11,261,155
     <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          33,313,219
     <PP&E>                                                    56,858,538
     <DEPRECIATION>                                           (9,491,356)
     <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           133,374,379
     <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     14,472,958
     <BONDS>                                                  102,352,881
     <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
     <PREFERRED>                                                        0
     <COMMON>                                                       2,838
     <OTHER-SE>                                                12,118,912
     <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             133,374,379
     <SALES>                                                  111,342,230
     <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         111,342,230
     <CGS>                                                     80,215,498
     <TOTAL-COSTS>                                             80,215,498
     <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          25,199,781
     <LOSS-PROVISION>                                             125,740
     <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       (8,125,767)
     <INCOME-PRETAX>                                          (2,198,816)
     <INCOME-TAX>                                               (626,739)
     <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      (1,572,077)
     <DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
     <EXTRAORDINARY>                                            (797,903)
     <CHANGES>                                                          0
     <NET-INCOME>                                             (2,369,980)


     <EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      0
     <EPS-DILUTED>                                                      0


</TABLE>
----

|                                                     | 2007                                              | 2006   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                     | (In      thousands – except per share data) |        |
| Net      Income                                          | $4,544                                            | $8,739 |   |
| Weighted      average shares outstanding – basic   | 9,796                                             | 9,775  |   |
| Shares      issuable upon exercise of dilutive options   | 258                                               | 318    |   |
| Less:      shares assumed repurchased                    | (19)                                              | (32)   |   |
| Weighted      average shares outstanding – diluted | 10,035                                            | 10,061 |   |
| Earnings      per share – basic                    | $0.46                                             | $0.89  |   |
| Earnings      per share – diluted                  | $0.45                                             | $0.87  |   |

----
STATE v. Jathlyah al-BAYYINAH.

No. 550A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 18, 2005.

Janet Moore, Assistant Public Defender, for Jathiyah al-Bayyinah.

Joan Cunningham, Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney Generals, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of April 2005 by Defendant to Stay Decision Pending the U.S. Supreme Court's Decision in Oregon v. Guzek:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 18th day of August 2005."
# L_2016098EN.01000602.xml

| 14.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 98/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 98/6

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/466 of 31 March 2016 implementing Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 85 of 1 April 2016
  )

On page 5, Annex (concerning Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44), Part A, column ‘Name’, entry No 18: the name ‘BADI, Salahdin’ is deleted.

---
STATE v. DUNN

No. COA04-1512

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Lenoir (03CRS53866).

Case without published opinion. No error.