DEFENSE 

SPENDING 

BY STATE

U.S. Department of Defense

Office of Economic Adjustment

FISCAL YEAR 2018
This page intentionally left blank
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The U.S. Department of Defense’s (DoD’s) Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA) partnered 

with the Library of Congress’s Federal Research Division (FRD) to produce this report. The 

FRD analysts involved were Vega Bharadwaj, Katarina David, and Wm. Noël Noël. Liz 

Chimienti managed this project for OEA and provided input throughout the report’s 

development. In addition, Zuhair Mahmoud, a specialist in the Library’s Office of the Chief 

Information Officer, provided helpful advice concerning information accessibility.

This research benefited from the guidance of staff at the DoD’s Defense Manpower Data 

Center and the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Experts at the American Enterprise Institute, 

Brookings Institution, Center for a New American Security, and Center for Strategic and 

International Studies generously offered feedback on earlier versions of this report. 

Please direct any questions or suggestions for future reports via email to: 

Tara Butler 

Program Director, Intergovernmental Affairs 

Office of Economic Adjustment, U.S. Department of Defense 

tara.a.butler4.civ@mail.mil

An electronic copy of this report is located online at http://oea.gov/dsbs-fy2018.
2 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Acknowledgments............................................. 1

Introduction .................................................. 3

State and District of Columbia Summary Table.................... 7

How to Read This Report...................................... 10

United States Overview ....................................... 14

State and District of Columbia Profiles.......................... 18

Appendix 1: Military Installations.............................. 120

Appendix 2: Methodology .................................... 127
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 3

INTRODUCTION

This report presents the results of a state by state 

analysis of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) contract 

and personnel spending during fiscal year (FY) 2018. 

The report’s graphs, maps, and tables present a range 

of findings, such as total spending figures, categories of 

contracted goods and services, major defense vendors, 

and numbers and types of defense personnel. State and 

local officials may use this information to assess a region’s 

dependence on defense spending and to target assistance 

to support more resilient communities and companies.

Conducted between June 2019 and December 2019, 

the analysis primarily entailed an examination of DoDfunded prime- and sub-award contract data and defense 

personnel and payroll figures. Findings are drawn from an 

array of sources, including the DoD’s Defense Manpower 

Data Center and USAspending.gov, which is managed by 

the U.S. Department of the Treasury. 

FY 2018 Overview

In FY 2018, the DoD’s budget authority rose for a third 

straight year, from $626.2 billion to $694.5 billion.1 DoD 

contract obligations and payroll spending in all 50 states 

and the District of Columbia totaled $500.0 billion, 

approximately $1,528 per U.S. resident and 2.4 percent of 

the country’s gross domestic product (GDP). Contracts for 

various products and services totaled $358.9 billion, thus 

comprising the majority of the spending, while DoD 

personnel payroll accounted for $141.2 billion (see table 1). 

Most contract funds went to supplies and equipment 

(such as aircraft, ships, weapons, and parts; 53 percent) 

and services (36 percent), with research and development 

(8 percent) and construction (2 percent) comprising the 

remainder. The largest portion of personnel pay was for 

active duty military (43 percent), followed by civilians (28 

percent), the National Guard (16 percent), and the 

Reserves (13 percent).

Examined at the state level, defense spending ranged from 

$472.7 million in Wyoming to $57.7 billion in California, 

1

 All numbers presented in current U.S. dollars. See table 6-9, “Department of Defense Budget Authority by Category,” in Office of the Under Secretary of Defense 

(Comptroller), National Defense Budget Estimates for FY 2020, May 2019, 146, https://comptroller.defense.gov/Portals/45/Documents/defbudget/fy2020/FY20_Green_Book.

pdf.

 RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions)

1 California $57.7

2 Virginia $56.2

3 Texas $50.8

4 Maryland $25.2

5 Florida $24.1

6 Washington $16.2

7 Pennsylvania $16.1

8 Connecticut $15.9

 9 Alabama $15.4

10 Arizona $15.2

Total for Top Ten States $292.8

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $500.0

averaging $2.9 billion per state among the 50 states and 

the District of Columbia. Approximately 59 percent of 

the $500.0 billion total went to 10 states (see table 1).

Table 1: Top 10 States by Total Defense Spending

 RANK STATE PERCENTAGE

 1 Virginia 10.3

2 Hawaii 7.7

3 Mississippi 7.2

4 Alabama 6.9

5 Alaska 6.4

6 Maryland 6.0

7 Connecticut 5.7

8 District of Columbia 5.2

9 Kentucky 5.2

10 Missouri 4.7

Table 2: Top 10 States by Defense Spending as Percentage of State GDP 
4 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

Similarly, Colorado, Georgia, and Hawaii were among the 

largest recipients of defense personnel spending, but were 

not among the top states for overall defense spending (see 

table 4).

Methodology Change

The FY 2018 report contains one significant change from 

prior reports. From FY 2013 until FY 2017, the Defense 

Spending by State report reflected the length of each 

prime contract in USAspending.gov. Such adjustments 

were not made for the figures in the FY 2018 report due 

to data quality concerns (e.g., some contracts appear to 

have activity long after the end of the period of 

performance). The analysis continues, however, to adjust 

the prime obligations to reflect the year and place of 

performance of sub-awards. 

In order to provide context for this report, the analysts 

also applied this simplified methodology to the FY 2017 

data. A workbook with the FY 2017 and FY 2018 findings is 

located at http://oea.gov/dsbs-fy2018. 

Appendix 2 contains additional details on this report’s 

research methodology.

 RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions)

1 California $42.5

 2 Texas $39.9

 3 Virginia $38.2

4 Maryland $17.8

5 Florida $16.9

 6 Connecticut $15.2

 7 Missouri $13.6

8 Pennsylvania $13.4

9 Massachusetts $13.4

10 Arizona $13.2

Total for Top Ten States $224.2

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $358.9

On average, defense spending comprised 2.7 percent of a 

state’s GDP. Several states that exceeded this average, 

however, were not among the top recipients of total 

defense spending, including Hawaii (7.7 percent of state 

GDP), Mississippi (7.2 percent), and Alaska (6.4 percent; 

see table 2).

Further review shows that some states received 

substantial funds for both contract and personnel 

spending, while other states received relatively high 

amounts in only one. Specifically, California, Florida, 

Maryland, Texas, and Virginia were all among the top ten 

recipients of defense contract and personnel spending. 

Arizona, Connecticut, and Missouri, major recipients of 

defense contract funds, were not among the top ten 

states for overall defense spending (see table 3). 

 

Table 3: Top 10 States by Defense Contract Spending

 RANK STATE DEFENSE SPENDING

 (billions)

1 Virginia $18.0

2 California $15.2

3 Texas $10.9

4 Maryland $7.4

5 Florida $7.2

 6 North Carolina $6.9

7 Washington $6.5

8 Georgia $6.4

 9 Hawaii $4.9

10 Colorado $3.5

Total for Top Ten States $86.8

Total for 50 States and District of Columbia $141.2

Table 4: Top 10 States by Defense Personnel Spending
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 5

DATA SOURCE PERTINENT INFORMATION

USAspending.gov U.S. Department of the Treasury Prime- and sub-award spending on 

defense-related goods and services

Defense Manpower Data Center U.S. Department of Defense Personnel counts as of September 30, 

2018 and gross payroll figures

Gross Domestic Product by State, Fourth 

Quarter and Annual 2018

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau 

of Economic Analysis State gross domestic product totals

“2018 National and State Population 

Estimates”

U.S. Department of Commerce, Census 

Bureau State and national population figures

Defense Procurement and Acquisition 

Policy U.S. Department of Defense Spending categories

“HUD USPS ZIP Code Crosswalk Files: 

ZIP-County Crosswalk”

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban 

Development Counties corresponding to ZIP codes

“Military Installations, Ranges and 

Training Areas” U.S. Department of Defense Military installations by state and county

Data Sources and Publications Used in This Analysis
This page intentionally left blank
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 7

SUMMARY TABLE

The following table shows U.S. Department of Defense 

(DoD) contract and personnel spending data for all 50 

states and the District of Columbia (listed alphabetically) 

in fiscal year (FY) 2018, which can be used to provide 

information and statistics about various topics, such as:

• The importance of defense spending for a state’s

economy (Columns 1 and 3).

• How that spending compares to other states and the

country overall (Columns 2, 10, and 11).

• The association between defense spending and a state’s

economic reliance on defense-related employment and

industries (Columns 4-9).

The columns show the following variables:

1. Defense Spending as a Share of GDP identifies the total

amount of defense spending (i.e., contracts and payroll)

per state as a share of that state’s GDP. This provides an

indication of the degree to which a state’s economic

health depends on such funding and how vulnerable

a state is to DoD spending changes.

2. State Share of Total U.S. Defense Spending calculates

each state’s share of total defense spending (i.e.,

contract spending and payroll in the 50 states plus the

District of Columbia), which helps to identify the largest

and smallest recipients of DoD funding.

3. Defense Spending per Resident is the amount DoD

spent per resident in a state or the District of Columbia

on defense contracts and payrolls. Like “Defense

Spending as a Share of GDP,” it shows a state’s relative

dependence on and vulnerability to changes in this type

of support.

4. Total Contract and Payroll Spending is the sum of all

DoD payroll and contract spending in a state or the

District of Columbia.

5. Total Contract Spending shows the amount DoD spent

on contracts in a given state or the District of Columbia.

6. Total Payroll is the gross pay received by active duty,

civilian, National Guard, and Reserve personnel with

an assigned or duty location in a state or the District

of Columbia during FY 2018. These figures, as well as

those in columns 7-9, do not include benefits for

current or former defense personnel.

7. Civilian Pay shows the total gross pay to DoD civilian

personnel in FY 2018.

8. Military Active Duty Pay equals the total gross pay to

active duty personnel in FY 2018.

9. National Guard & Reserve Pay refers to the total gross

pay received by National Guard and Reserve personnel

in FY 2018.

10. Ranking by Defense Spending as a Share of State GDP

indicates a state’s placement among the 50 states and

the District of Columbia with respect to the total

amount of defense spending (i.e., contracts and payroll)

as a share of that state’s GDP.

11. Ranking by Total Defense Spending likewise indicates

a state’s placement among the 50 states and the District

of Columbia. Detailed information on the methodology

for these statistics is included in appendix 2.

The FY 2018 report contains one significant change 

from prior reports. From FY 2013 until FY 2017, 

the Defense Spending by State report reflected the 

length of each prime contract in USAspending.gov. 

Such adjustments were not made for the figures 

in the FY 2018 report due to data quality concerns 

(e.g., some contracts appear to have activity 

long after the end of the period of performance). 

The analysis continues, however, to adjust the 

prime obligations to reflect the year and place of 

performance of sub-awards. 
DEFENSE SPENDING 

AS A SHARE OF GDP 

(%)

STATE SHARE OF 

TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

(%)

DEFENSE SPENDING 

PER RESIDENT 

($)

TOTAL CONTRACT AND 

PAYROLL SPENDING 

($ billions)

TOTAL CONTRACT

SPENDING

($ billions)

TOTAL PAYROLL

($ billions)

Alabama 6.9 3.1 3,150 15.4 12.2 3.2

Alaska 6.4 0.7 4,730 3.5 1.8 1.7

Arizona 4.3 3.0 2,122 15.2 13.2 2.0

Arkansas 1.0 0.3 427 1.3 0.6 0.7

California 1.9 11.5 1,459 57.7 42.5 15.2

Colorado 2.6 2.0 1,719 9.8 6.3 3.5

Connecticut 5.7 3.2 4,439 15.9 15.2 0.7

Delaware 0.7 0.1 553 0.5 0.1 0.4

District of Columbia 5.2 1.5 10,540 7.4 5.1 2.3

Florida 2.3 4.8 1,132 24.1 16.9 7.2

Georgia 2.3 2.7 1,302 13.7 7.3 6.4

Hawaii 7.7 1.4 5,050 7.2 2.3 4.9

Idaho 0.8 0.1 355 0.6 0.2 0.4

Illinois 1.1 2.0 790 10.1 7.9 2.2

Indiana 1.2 0.9 691 4.6 3.3 1.3

Iowa 1.2 0.5 730 2.3 2.0 0.3

Kansas 1.8 0.6 1,057 3.1 1.1 2.0

Kentucky 5.2 2.2 2,455 11.0 8.2 2.8

Louisiana 1.1 0.6 627 2.9 1.3 1.6

Maine 2.9 0.4 1,422 1.9 1.2 0.7

Maryland 6.0 5.0 4,169 25.2 17.8 7.4

Massachusetts 2.5 2.9 2,091 14.4 13.4 1.1

Michigan 1.0 1.1 538 5.4 4.2 1.2

Minnesota 1.0 0.7 641 3.6 3.1 0.5

Mississippi 7.2 1.7 2,774 8.3 6.6 1.7

Missouri 4.7 3.0 2,475 15.2 13.6 1.5

Montana 1.1 0.1 511 0.5 0.2 0.3

Nebraska 1.2 0.3 790 1.5 0.6 0.9

Nevada 1.8 0.6 1,023 3.1 2.0 1.1

New Hampshire 3.1 0.5 1,988 2.7 2.5 0.2

New Jersey 1.2 1.5 843 7.5 5.8 1.7

New Mexico 4.0 0.8 1,953 4.1 2.8 1.3

New York 0.6 2.1 530 10.4 7.7 2.7

North Carolina 1.9 2.2 1,050 10.9 4.0 6.9

North Dakota 1.4 0.2 1,028 0.8 0.2 0.6

Ohio 1.4 1.9 819 9.6 6.4 3.2

Oklahoma 3.2 1.3 1,658 6.5 3.5 3.0

Oregon 0.7 0.3 401 1.7 1.2 0.5

Pennsylvania 2.0 3.2 1,259 16.1 13.4 2.7

Rhode Island 2.4 0.3 1,384 1.5 0.7 0.8

South Carolina 2.7 1.3 1,231 6.3 3.7 2.6

South Dakota 1.2 0.1 713 0.6 0.3 0.4

Tennessee 0.8 0.6 439 3.0 2.0 1.0

Texas 2.8 10.2 1,770 50.8 39.9 10.9

Utah 2.2 0.8 1,284 4.1 2.4 1.7

Vermont 1.9 0.1 1,026 0.6 0.5 0.1

Virginia 10.3 11.2 6,603 56.2 38.2 18.0

Washington 2.8 3.2 2,145 16.2 9.7 6.5

West Virginia 1.0 0.2 438 0.8 0.5 0.3

Wisconsin 1.1 0.8 671 3.9 3.4 0.5

Wyoming 1.2 0.1 818 0.5 0.2 0.3

U.S. Average/Total 2.4 100.0 1,528 500.0*

 358.9 141.2

1 2 3 4 5

* These figures do not total $500.0 billion due to rounding.

8 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

6
CIVILIAN PAY

($ billions)

MILITARY ACTIVE 

DUTY PAY

($ billions)

NATIONAL GUARD & 

RESERVE PAY

($ billions)

RANKING BY DEFENSE 

SPENDING AS A SHARE 

OF STATE GDP 

RANKING BY TOTAL 

DEFENSE SPENDING

Alabama 2.1 0.6 0.5 4 9

Alaska 0.4 1.1 0.2 5 32

Arizona 0.6 1.0 0.4 11 10

Arkansas 0.2 0.2 0.2 45 43

California 5.3 8.5 1.4 26 1

Colorado 0.9 2.2 0.4 19 18

Connecticut 0.2 0.3 0.1 7 8

Delaware 0.1 0.2 0.1 49 50

District of Columbia 1.4 0.8 0.2 8 22

Florida 2.4 3.9 0.9 23 5 

Georgia 2.4 3.4 0.6 22 13

Hawaii 1.7 2.9 0.3 2 23

Idaho 0.1 0.2 0.1 48 48

Illinois 1.0 0.7 0.5 40 17

Indiana 0.8 0.1 0.4 33 27

Iowa 0.1 0.0 0.2 36 38

Kansas 0.5 1.3 0.3 30 34 

Kentucky 0.7 1.8 0.3 9 14

Louisiana 0.4 0.8 0.4 39 36

Maine 0.6 0.0 0.1 15 39 

Maryland 4.5 2.3 0.5 6 4

Massachusetts 0.5 0.2 0.3 20 12 

Michigan 0.8 0.1 0.3 43 26

Minnesota 0.2 0.0 0.4 46 31 

Mississippi 0.6 0.6 0.5 3 20

Missouri 0.5 0.6 0.4 10 11

Montana 0.1 0.2 0.1 42 49

Nebraska 0.3 0.4 0.1 34 41

Nevada 0.2 0.7 0.2 29 33 

New Hampshire 0.1 0.1 0.1 14 37 

New Jersey 0.9 0.4 0.4 38 21

New Mexico 0.5 0.7 0.1 12 28

New York 0.8 1.2 0.7 51 16

North Carolina 1.5 4.9 0.5 27 15

North Dakota 0.1 0.4 0.1 31 45

Ohio 2.1 0.5 0.5 32 19

Oklahoma 1.7 1.0 0.3 13 24 

Oregon 0.2 0.0 0.2 50 40 

Pennsylvania 1.9 0.2 0.6 25 7

Rhode Island 0.4 0.2 0.1 21 42

South Carolina 0.7 1.4 0.4 18 25

South Dakota 0.1 0.2 0.1 35 47

Tennessee 0.4 0.2 0.4 47 35

Texas 3.4 6.2 1.3 17 3

Utah 1.1 0.3 0.3 24 29

Vermont 0.0 0.0 0.1 28 46 

Virginia 8.9 8.3 0.8 1 2 

Washington 2.4 3.6 0.5 16 6 

West Virginia 0.1 0.0 0.2 44 44

Wisconsin 0.2 0.1 0.3 41 30 

Wyoming 0.1 0.2 0.1 37 51 

U.S. Average/Total 57.2 65.4 18.6 N/A N/A

Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 9

7 8 9 10 11
10 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

16 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Boeing $2.1 B

Austal $1.5 B

Northrop Grumman $618.7 M

SAIC $612.7 M

Redstone Defense Systems $295.0 M

M1 Support Services $282.4 M

KBR $270.0 M

L3 Technologies $246.8 M

Leidos $212.7 M

Parsons Corp. $206.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

ALABAMA

#9 #4 3.1% $3,150 #11 #18 #11

$15.4 B SPENT

IN STATE

6.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $12.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

51,588 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

51,588

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Madison 724 13,582 498 706 15,510

Montgomery 2,874 3,109 2,663 2,268 10,914

Dale 3,685 2,217 52 133 6,087

Calhoun 59 3,375 1,007 414 4,855

Jefferson 298 447 1,892 1,923 4,560

Mobile 37 765 853 621 2,276

Houston 44 41 356 133 574

Tuscaloosa 13 79 166 248 506

Lee 55 21 153 233 462

Coffee ND 179 275 ND

Construction: 1%

Research and

Development: 12%

Service: 44%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 43%

Active Duty: 15%

Civilian: 47%

National 

Guard: 24%

Reserve: 14%

45%

15%

6%

34%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

73%

2%

18%

7%

$9.4 $8.0 $7.9 $8.4 $8.5 $9.1 $8.6

$12.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

A

D

E

B

C

F

I

G

H

J

K L M N O P Q

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 11

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

The following information briefly describes the statistics listed in the state profiles throughout this report. A listing of 

military installations by state and county can be found in appendix 1. More detailed information on the methodology is 

included in appendix 2.

Defense Contracts refers to U.S. Department of 

Defense (DoD) obligations through DoD-funded 

contracts during fiscal year (FY) 2018 (i.e., October 1, 

2017 through September 30, 2018). All contract data 

are from USAspending.gov and include prime awards 

the DoD made to private- and public-sector 

contractors, as well as sub-awards that prime-award 

recipients provided to subcontractors.

Defense Contracts, By Type represents the 

proportions of total prime and sub-award obligations 

in a state that went to four product and service 

categories: construction; research and development; 

service; and supplies and equipment. The DoD’s 

Procurement and Acquisition Policy was used to 

categorize spending on the products and services 

identified by the product service code listed in each 

prime award record.

Defense Contracts, By Service is the percentage of 

defense contract spending that was funded by the 

Military Services or Other Defense activities in a state 

or the District of Columbia. This category includes the 

Office of the Secretary of Defense, Joint Chiefs of 

Staff, Inspector General (DoD), U.S. Court of Appeals 

for the Armed Forces, Defense Agencies, and the 

Defense Field Activities. These figures include prime 

awards and sub-awards since both records have fields 

that identify the federal agency that funded the 

award.

Top Defense Contractors lists the private- and publicsector vendors that were among the ten largest 

recipients of DoD obligations in a state or the District 

of Columbia. These figures are adjusted to reflect the 

place of performance for prime and sub-awards (see 

appendix 2 for details).

Contract Awards Performed by Fiscal Year represents 

the total value of defense contract awards in a state 

or the District of Columbia for each fiscal year from 

FY 2011 through FY 2018. These figures are adjusted 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

A

to reflect the place of performance for prime and 

sub-awards (see appendix 2 for details).

Defense Personnel includes the total numbers of 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel in a state or the District of Columbia on 

September 30, 2018. Defense payroll figures are the 

total gross pay received by those personnel in FY 

2018. The states and counties refer to the duty 

locations for active duty and civilian personnel. 

National Guard and Reserve personnel figures are 

based on assigned locations. These data are from the 

DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC).

Allocations, By Type indicates the proportions of total 

defense personnel with an assigned or duty location 

in a state or the District of Columbia who were active 

duty, civilian, National Guard, or Reserve personnel 

on September 30, 2018.

Allocations, By Service represents a snapshot of the 

proportion of total defense personnel across the 

Military Services and other DoD activities with an 

assigned or duty location in a state or the District of 

Columbia on September 30, 2018.

Total Payroll and Personnel is the total gross pay 

during FY 2018 and count of all active duty, civilian, 

National Guard, or Reserve personnel with an 

assigned or duty location in a state or the District of 

Columbia on September 30, 2018. Pension payments 

and other benefits are not included in the payroll 

figure.

Top Defense Personnel Locations lists the ten 

counties with the highest numbers of defense 

personnel reported on September 30, 2018. Personnel 

numbers are not disclosed—indicated by “ND”—for 

counties in which the numbers of active duty, civilian, 

or National Guard and Reserve personnel are less 

than ten to protect those individuals’ personally 

identifiable information.

D

B

C

E

G

H

I

J

F

DEFENSE PERSONNEL
12 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS 

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Limestone

Calhoun Jefferson

Talladega Tuscaloosa

Coffee

Dale

Mobile

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALABAMA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Madison

Mobile

Dale

Montgomery

Calhoun

Tuscaloosa

Talladega

Jefferson

Limestone

Coffee

(M = millions, B = billions)

$8.8 B

$1.5 B

$795.4 M

$261.6 M

$170.5 M

$89.8 M

$78.7 M

$77.3 M

$75.9 M

$53.7 M

Madison

Lee

Montgomery

Coffee

Dale

Houston

Madison

Montgomery

Dale

Calhoun

Jefferson

Mobile

Houston

Lee

Tuscaloosa

Coffee

$1.5 B

$599.9 M

$418.8 M

$237.5 M

$158.9 M

$90.9 M

$22.3 M

$16.4 M

$16.2 M

$14.2 M

Montgomery

Madison

Jefferson Calhoun

Tuscaloosa

Mobile

R

S
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 13

$ Spent in State is the combined total of defense 

contract obligations and defense personnel spending 

in a state or the District of Columbia during FY 2018. 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia.

% of State GDP represents the combined total of 

defense contract obligations and personnel spending 

as a proportion of a state or the District of Columbia’s 

GDP in FY 2018. State’s GDP is the total value of all 

goods and services produced in a given fiscal year; 

these data are from the U.S. Department of 

Commerce’s Bureau of Economic Analysis. The 

ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia.

% of Total U.S. Defense Spending is the combined 

total of defense contract obligations and personnel 

spending in a state or the District of Columbia as a 

proportion of the DoD’s contract and personnel 

spending in all 50 states and the District of Columbia 

in FY 2018.

$ per Resident highlights the combined total defense 

contract obligations and personnel spending in a 

state or the District of Columbia divided by the area’s 

overall population. These population figures are July 

2018 estimates provided by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Contract Spending is the total amount of contracts 

the DoD obligations for products and services in a 

state or the District of Columbia during FY 2018. The 

ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia.

Number of Personnel indicates the total number of 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel with an assigned or duty location in a state 

or the District of Columbia on September 30, 2018. 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia.

HOW TO READ THIS REPORT

K

L

M

N

O

P

Personnel Spending totals the gross pay received by 

active duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve 

personnel with an assigned or duty location in a state 

or the District of Columbia during FY 2018. This figure 

does not include pension payments or other benefits. 

The ranking above this statistic indicates a state’s 

placement among the 50 states and the District of 

Columbia.

Top Defense Contract Spending Locations lists and 

shows the ten counties (or independent cities) in a 

state with the highest defense contract obligations in 

FY 2018. For states with fewer than ten counties, all 

counties are identified. The District of Columbia is the 

only jurisdiction represented by a single location.

Top Defense Personnel Spending Locations lists and 

shows the ten counties (or independent cities) within 

a state with the highest gross pay received by active 

duty, civilian, National Guard, and Reserve personnel 

during FY 2018. For states with fewer than ten 

counties, all counties are identified. The District of 

Columbia is the only jurisdiction represented by a 

single location.

Caveat for the Personnel Counts in this Report: 

Readers are cautioned not to compare changes in 

personnel by county from the Defense Spending by 

State FY 2016 report to the FY 2018 report as the 

differences are likely due to changes in this report’s 

source of personnel data. This report reflects DMDC 

data for all personnel corresponding to a single 

snapshot in time (September 30, 2018) rather than 

over the course of the fiscal year.

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

R

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS

S

SUMMARY BAR Q

The FY 2018 report contains one significant change from prior 

reports. From FY 2013 until FY 2017, the Defense Spending 

by State report reflected the length of each prime contract in 

USAspending.gov. Such adjustments were not made for the 

figures in the FY 2018 report due to data quality concerns (e.g., 

some contracts appear to have activity long after the end of 

the period of performance). The analysis continues, however, 

to adjust the prime obligations to reflect the year and place of 

performance of sub-awards.
Contract Spending

Total Spending as % of State GDP

Top 10 States by Contract Spending

14 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Billions

$15.2 to $57.7 

$8.3 to $15.1

$3.9 to $7.5

$1.7 to $3.6

$0.5 to $1.5

California $57.7

Virginia $56.2

Texas $50.8

Maryland $25.2

Florida $24.1

Washington $16.2

Pennsylvania $16.1

Connecticut $15.9

Alabama $15.4

Arizona $15.2

 DC

 Top 10 States by Total Spending

 as % of GDP

Virginia 10.3

Hawaii 7.7

Mississippi 7.2

Alabama 6.9

Alaska 6.4

Maryland 6.0

Connecticut 5.7

District of Columbia 5.2

Kentucky 5.2

Missouri 4.7

Total Spending Top 10 States by Total Spending 

(billions)

 Percentage

4.7 to 10.3

2.5 to 4.3

1.8 to 2.4

1.1 to 1.4

0.6 to 1.1

California $42.5

Texas $39.9

Virginia $38.2

Maryland $17.8

Florida $16.9

Connecticut $15.2

Missouri $13.6

Pennsylvania $13.4

Massachusetts $13.4

Arizona $13.2

(billions)

Billions

$13.2 to $42.5 

$5.8 to $12.2

$2.5 to $5.1

$1.2 to $2.4

$0.1 to $0.7

UNITED STATES

FISCAL YEAR 2018

 DC

 DC
Personnel Numbers

Personnel Spending Top 10 States by Personnel Spending

Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 15

Billions

$3.5 to $18.0 

$2.2 to $3.2

$1.2 to $2.0

$0.6 to $1.1

$0.1 to $0.5

Virginia $18.0

California $15.2

Texas $10.9

Maryland $7.4

Florida $7.2

North Carolina $6.9

Washington $6.5

Georgia $6.4

Hawaii $4.9

Colorado $3.5

 Top 10 States by Personnel Numbers

 (billions)

 Thousands

68 to 273

43 to 61

25 to 39

13 to 24

4 to 12

(thousands)

UNITED STATES FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2018

 DC

 DC

California 273

Virginia 245

Texas 219

North Carolina 143

Florida 128

Georgia 127

Washington 108

Maryland 92

Hawaii 71

South Carolina 68
16 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (B = billlions) 

Lockheed Martin $37.8 B

Boeing $26.2 B

Raytheon $17.9 B

General Dynamics $14.4 B

Northrop Grumman $13.8 B

Huntington Ingalls $7.1 B

United Technologies $7.0 B

BAE Systems $6.9 B

L3 Technologies $6.2 B

Humana $5.4 B

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

UNITED STATES

$500.0 B 2.4% $1,528 $358.9 B 2.6 M $141.2 B

TOTAL SPENT OF GDP PER RESIDENT CONTRACT SPENDING NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL

PERSONNEL SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$141.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

2,626,434

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

San Diego, CA 76,592 23,805 877 8,739 110,013

Bexar, TX 35,972 22,248 3,253 8,934 70,407

Honolulu, HI 35,121 19,125 4,647 3,870 62,763

Cumberland, NC 46,473 10,386 563 2,249 59,671

El Paso, CO 31,696 8,647 916 4,499 45,758

Pierce, WA 28,976 7,530 2,877 5,646 45,029

Onslow, NC 39,419 3,738 113 543 43,813

Bell, TX 32,206 5,405 453 808 38,872

Norfolk City, VA 16,184 16,317 291 2,177 34,969

El Paso, TX 25,785 4,061 1,149 1,828 32,823

Construction: 2%

Research and 

Development: 8%

Service: 36%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 53%

Active Duty: 43%

Civilian: 28%

National 

Guard: 16%

Reserve: 13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

22%

34%

21%

22%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

45%

28%

23%

4%

$315.7 $314.3

$265.9 $264.2 $248.2 $281.0

$358.9

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

$303.7
Offi ce of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 17

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

King

Middlesex

Fairfax Jefferson

Madison

San Diego

Los Angeles

Tarrant

UNITED STATES FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 I S CAL YEAR 2 0 1 8

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions) (B = billions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Tarrant, TX

Fairfax, VA

St. Louis, MO

San Diego, CA

Los Angeles, CA

Madison, AL

King, WA

Pima, AZ

Middlesex, MA

Jeff erson, KY

(B = billions)

$17.8 B

$16.6 B

$11.9 B

$11.1 B

$9.5 B

$8.8 B

$7.2 B

$7.0 B

$6.1 B

$6.1 B

San Diego, CA

Honolulu, HI

Bexar, TX

Cumberland, NC

El Paso, CO

Norfolk, VA

Pierce, WA

District of Columbia

Fairfax, VA

Bell, TX

$6.2 B

$4.3 B

$3.9 B

$3.8 B

$2.8 B

$2.7 B

$2.6 B

$2.2 B

$2.2 B

$2.1 B

Pierce

El Paso

Fairfax District of Columbia

Norfolk

Cumberland

St. Louis

Pima

San Diego

Honolulu Bexar

Bell
18 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Boeing $2.1 B

Austal $1.5 B

Northrop Grumman $618.7 M

SAIC $612.7 M

Redstone Defense Systems $295.0 M

M1 Support Services $282.4 M

KBR $270.0 M

L3 Technologies $246.8 M

Leidos $212.7 M

Parsons Corp. $206.2 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

ALABAMA

#9 #4 3.1% $3,150 #11 #18 #11

$15.4 B SPENT

IN STATE

6.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $12.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

51,588 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

51,588

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Madison 724 13,582 498 706 15,510

Montgomery 2,874 3,109 2,663 2,268 10,914

Dale 3,685 2,217 52 133 6,087

Calhoun 59 3,375 1,007 414 4,855

Jefferson 298 447 1,892 1,923 4,560

Mobile 37 765 853 621 2,276

Houston 44 41 356 133 574

Tuscaloosa 13 79 166 248 506

Lee 55 21 153 233 462

Coffee ND 179 275 ND ND

Construction: 1%

Research and

Development: 12%

Service: 44%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 43%

Active Duty: 15%

Civilian: 47%

National 

Guard: 24%

Reserve: 14%

45%

15%

6%

34%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

73%

2%

18%

7%

$9.4

$8.0 $7.9 $8.4 $8.5 $9.1 $8.6

$12.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 19

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Limestone

Calhoun Jefferson

Talladega Tuscaloosa

Coffee

Dale

Mobile

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALABAMA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Madison

Mobile

Dale

Montgomery

Calhoun

Tuscaloosa

Talladega

Jefferson

Limestone

Coffee

(M = millions, B = billions)

$8.8 B

$1.5 B

$795.4 M

$261.6 M

$170.5 M

$89.8 M

$78.7 M

$77.3 M

$75.9 M

$53.7 M

Madison

Lee

Montgomery

Coffee

Dale

Houston

Madison

Montgomery

Dale

Calhoun

Jefferson

Mobile

Houston

Lee

Tuscaloosa

Coffee

$1.5 B

$599.9 M

$418.8 M

$237.5 M

$158.9 M

$90.9 M

$22.3 M

$16.4 M

$16.2 M

$14.2 M

Montgomery

Madison

Jefferson Calhoun

Tuscaloosa

Mobile
20 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Watterson Construction Co. $172.5 M

Arctic Slope Regional Corp. $159.4 M

Chugach Alaska Corp. $93.2 M

Doyon Utilities (DUL) $92.2 M

Haskell Corporation/Davis Constructors JV $46.0 M

Alaska Structures Inc. $36.8 M

Afognak Native Corp. $36.6 M

Crowley $36.6 M

Indyne $35.1 M

ARCTEC Alaska JV $31.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

ALASKA

#32 #5 0.7% $4,730 #36 #27 #25

$3.5 B SPENT

IN STATE

6.4% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $1.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

27,446 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.7 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

27,446

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Anchorage 9,603 3,140 2,435 706 15,884

Fairbanks North Star 7,940 1,615 712 94 10,361

Southeast Fairbanks ND 303 198 ND ND

Matanuska-Susitna ND ND 248 ND ND

Denali 32 33 94 ND ND

Kodiak Island 16 14 ND ND ND

Juneau ND 12 17 ND ND

Bethel ND ND 26 ND ND

Kenai Peninsula ND ND 13 ND

Nome ND ND ND ND ND

Construction: 28%

Research and 

Development: 0%

Service: 54%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 18%

Active Duty: 65%

Civilian: 19%

National Guard: 14%

Reserve: 3%

46%

7%

30%

17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

54%

1%

44%

1%

$1.7

$2.0

$1.3 $1.5 $1.3 $1.2

$1.5

$1.8

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 21

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

North Slope

Fairbanks North Star

Matanuska-Susitna

Ketchikan Gateway

Aleutians West

Yukon-Koyukuk

Denali Southeast Fairbanks

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ALASKA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Anchorage

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Denali

Aleutians West

Yukon-Koyukuk

Matanuska-Susitna

Kenai Peninsula

North Slope

Ketchikan Gateway

(K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions)

$818.1 M

$664.1 M

$114.0 M

$110.0 M

$32.6 M

$16.1 M

$9.3 M

$9.1 M

$8.8 M

$8.1 M

Nome

Bethel

Kenai Peninsula Juneau

Kodiak Island

Anchorage

Fairbanks North Star

Southeast Fairbanks

Denali

Matanuska-Susitna

Kodiak Island

Juneau

Kenai Peninsula

Bethel

Nome

$1.0 B

$594.0 M

$41.2 M

$14.1 M

$4.2 M

$2.8 M

$1.3 M

$481.6 K

$428.6 K

$190.6 K

Anchorage

Southeast Fairbanks

Anchorage

Kenai Peninsula

Matanuska-Susitna

Denali

Fairbanks North Star
22 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Raytheon $6.7 B

Boeing $2.0 B

Honeywell $1.1 B

Northrop Grumman $681.2 M

Patriarch Partners $218.3 M

General Dynamics $213.0 M

Nammo $133.1 M

Trax International $99.0 M

Insight Enterprises $91.9 M

Advanced Turbine Engine $73.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

ARIZONA

#10 #11 3.0% $2,122 #10 #20 #21

$15.2 B SPENT

IN STATE

4.3% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $13.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

43,196 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.0 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.0 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

43,196

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Maricopa 4,800 2,375 3,456 5,056 15,687

Pima 5,965 2,735 2,662 2,044 13,406

Cochise 3,805 2,703 47 179 6,734

Yuma 3,663 1,260 61 37 5,021

Pinal ND 209 763 12

Coconino 19 44 400 ND

Yavapai 12 ND 194 ND

Navajo ND ND 42 ND

Graham ND ND 38 ND

Apache ND ND ND ND

Construction: 1%

Research and 

Development: 6%

Service: 14%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 78%

Active Duty: 44%

Civilian: 22%

National 

Guard: 18%

Reserve: 17%

40%

24%

16%

21%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

39%

16%

43%

3%

$12.4 $12.5

$10.7

$8.6

$6.3

$8.9 $9.7

$13.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 23

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Coconino Apache

Yavapai

La Paz

Maricopa

Yuma Pinal

Cochise

Santa Cruz

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ARIZONA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Pima

Maricopa

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Santa Cruz

Yavapai

Coconino

La Paz

Apache

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$7.0 B

$5.1 B

$823.9 M

$243.4 M

$41.3 M

$36.8 M

$15.4 M

$6.4 M

$4.9 M

$684.3 K

Navajo

Graham

Pima

Maricopa

Cochise

Yuma

Pinal

Coconino

Yavapai

Navajo

Graham

Apache

$660.9 M

$641.9 M

$415.7 M

$234.5 M

$23.1 M

$11.4 M

$4.7 M

$645.7 K

$367.9 K

$114.3 K

Apache

Pima

Yuma

Coconino Apache

Yavapai

La Paz

Maricopa

Yuma Pinal

Cochise

Santa Cruz

Pima

Coconino

Yavapai

Maricopa

Pinal

Cochise

Santa Cruz

Pima
24 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Aerojet Rocketdyne $315.9 M

Esterline Technologies $26.6 M

Ducommun $20.7 M

Alessi-Keyes Construction $18.5 M

Carothers Construction Inc. $16.6 M

Arkansas Lighthouse for Blind Inc. $11.9 M

HGL Construction Inc. $10.9 M

Enviro Systems Inc. $10.9 M

PPG Industries $10.8 M

National Presto Industries $9.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

ARKANSAS

#43 #45 0.3% $427 #43 #35 #38

$1.3 B SPENT

IN STATE

1.0% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

17,989 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$660.4 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

17,989

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Pulaski 3,390 1,950 3,074 1,558 9,972

Sebastian 35 390 1,350 121 1,896

Jefferson 11 749 183 ND ND

Benton ND 28 603 120

Craighead ND 22 266 25

Washington 13 ND 287 ND

White ND 12 242 ND

Garland ND 62 64 109

Faulkner ND 26 78 112

Pope ND 59 107 ND

Construction: 6%

Research and 

Development: 1%

Service: 18%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 75%

Active Duty: 20%

Civilian: 20% National 

Guard: 47%

Reserve: 13%

68%

9%

15%

7%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

60%

2%

37%

1%

$0.9

$0.8

$0.4

$0.6

$0.4

$0.3 $0.4

$0.6

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 25

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Carroll

Washington

Sebastian

Pulaski

Hot Spring

Jefferson

Ouachita

Calhoun Miller

Columbia

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ARKANSAS

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Ouachita

Pulaski

Calhoun

Jefferson

Sebastian

Carroll

Miller

Columbia

Washington

Hot Spring

(M = millions)

$314.0 M

$112.1 M

$42.4 M

$27.7 M

$22.1 M

$18.4 M

$16.9 M

$16.0 M

$13.0 M

$6.1 M

Benton

Craighead

Pope

White

Faulkner

Pulaski

Garland

Jefferson

Pulaski

Sebastian

Jefferson

Benton

Garland

Washington

Pope

Faulkner

Craighead

White

$440.2 M

$58.2 M

$53.1 M

$10.5 M

$8.0 M

$7.7 M

$6.1 M

$5.3 M

$5.1 M

$4.7 M

Washington

Sebastian
26 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Northrop Grumman $3.8 B

Centene Corp. $3.0 B

General Atomic Technologies $2.7 B

McKesson $2.7 B

Lockheed Martin $2.6 B

Boeing $1.9 B

Raytheon $1.7 B

General Dynamics $1.4 B

Aerospace Corp. $965.4 M

L3 Technologies $698.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

CALIFORNIA

#1 #26 11.5% $1,459 #1 #1 #2

$57.7 B SPENT

IN STATE

1.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $42.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

272,728 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$15.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$15.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

272,728

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

San Diego 76,592 23,805 877 8,739 110,013

San Bernardino 13,844 3,339 572 505 18,260

Los Angeles 2,010 3,535 3,176 4,319 13,040

Ventura 4,539 5,707 987 1,321 12,554

Solano 6,538 1,611 284 3,564 11,997

Kern 2,537 8,322 313 305 11,477

Riverside 365 2,659 1,487 5,060 9,571

Monterey 4,607 4,062 93 389 9,151

Kings 6,204 821 ND 489

Orange 447 1,133 1,996 3,385 6,961

Construction: 3% Research and 

Development: 12%

Service: 41%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 44%

Active Duty: 56%

Civilian: 23%

National 

Guard: 7%

Reserve: 14%

12%

38%

26%

25%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

17%

66%

15%

2%

$40.8 $40.8

$34.2 $33.0 $31.5

$36.2 $36.6

$42.5

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 27

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Yolo

Sacramento Alameda

Santa Clara

Kern

San Bernardino

Ventura

Orange

Los Angeles

CALIFORNIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

San Diego

Los Angeles

Sacramento

Orange

Santa Clara

Yolo

Ventura

Alameda

San Bernardino

Kern

(M = millions, B = billions)

$11.1 B

$9.5 B

$4.2 B

$4.0 B

$3.6 B

$2.7 B

$1.2 B

$848.8 M

$765.8 M

$739.0 M

Yuba

Solano

Monterey

Kings

Kern San Bernardino

Riverside

San Diego

San Diego

Kern

Ventura

San Bernardino

Monterey

Solano

Los Angeles

Kings

Riverside

Yuba

$6.2 B

$904.1 M

$880.2 M

$796.6 M

$681.5 M

$667.8 M

$660.8 M

$413.4 M

$384.6 M

$335.0 M

Los Angeles

San Diego

Ventura
28 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

United Launch Alliance $1.3 B

Raytheon $556.9 M

Lockheed Martin $513.8 M

Bechtel Group $444.1 M

Ball Corp. $265.8 M

Jacobs Engineering Group $232.6 M

Harris Corp. $184.2 M

Northrop Grumman $91.0 M

Intelligent Software Solutions $87.2 M

CACI $83.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

COLORADO

#18 #19 2.0% $1,719 #19 #12 #10

$9.8 B SPENT

IN STATE

2.6% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $6.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

60,221 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

60,221

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

El Paso 31,696 8,647 916 4,499 45,758

Arapahoe 2,589 1,491 2,427 1,565 8,072

Denver 210 266 466 574 1,516

Adams ND 64 295 863

Weld ND 113 595 171

Jefferson 52 279 ND 437

Pueblo 17 441 125 ND

Boulder 70 56 66 ND

Mesa 16 25 107 ND

Larimer 23 ND 108 ND

Construction: 4%

Research and 

Development: 21%

Service: 60%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 15%

Active Duty: 58%

Civilian: 19%

National 

Guard: 9%

Reserve: 14%

21%

6%

61%

12%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

62%

4%

32%

2%

$6.2 $6.6

$4.5

$5.9

$5.0 $5.7

$6.4 $6.3

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 29

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Larimer

Boulder

Adams

Jefferson

Denver

Arapahoe

Mesa Douglas

El Paso

Pueblo

COLORADO FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

El Paso

Arapahoe

Pueblo

Jefferson

Douglas

Boulder

Denver

Adams

Larimer

Mesa

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.6 B

$2.0 B

$478.5 M

$410.4 M

$298.9 M

$278.1 M

$106.9 M

$63.7 M

$54.9 M

$42.1 M

Larimer Weld

Boulder

Adams

Arapahoe

Mesa

El Paso

Pueblo

El Paso

Arapahoe

Denver

Jefferson

Adams

Pueblo

Weld

Boulder

Larimer

Mesa

$2.8 B

$402.1 M

$56.0 M

$38.2 M

$35.0 M

$32.9 M

$21.0 M

$10.9 M

$5.2 M

$3.7 M

Jefferson

Denver
30 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

General Dynamics $5.6 B

United Technologies $5.6 B

Lockheed Martin $2.8 B

Kaman Corp. $91.1 M

Ensign-Bickford Industries $71.1 M

Timken $40.0 M

Triumph Group Inc. $30.0 M

Colt Defense Holding $27.8 M

PCX Aerostructures $27.4 M

Leonardo SpA $27.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

CONNECTICUT

#8 #7 3.2% $4,439 #6 #38 #37

$15.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

5.7% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $15.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

14,791 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$687.4 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

14,791

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

New London 4,074 1,462 1,052 71 6,659

Hartford 36 797 2,154 657 3,644

New Haven 75 63 446 485 1,069

Middlesex ND 59 646 342

Fairfield 13 233 397 315 958

Tolland 78 ND 42 ND

Litchfield ND 11 ND ND

Windham ND ND ND ND ND

Construction: 0% Research and

Development: 8%

Service: 9%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 83%

Active Duty: 38%

Civilian: 18%

National 

Guard: 32%

Reserve: 13%

11%

72%

14%

4%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

36%

49%

10%

4%

$12.5 $12.7

$10.1

$12.8 $12.5

$14.4

$10.3

$15.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 31

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Litchfield Hartford

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven

CONNECTICUT FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Hartford

New London

Fairfield

New Haven

Middlesex

Litchfield

Tolland

Windham

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$6.0 B

$5.8 B

$3.0 B

$177.3 M

$50.6 M

$46.1 M

$45.1 M

$22.4 M

New London

Hartford

Fairfield

New Haven

Middlesex

Tolland

Litchfield

Windham

$380.6 M

$120.5 M

$36.0 M

$31.1 M

$24.3 M

$6.5 M

$599.5 K

$413.7 K

Litchfield Hartford

Tolland

Windham

New London

Fairfield

Middlesex

New Haven
32 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

American Registry of Pathology $10.6 M

Caesar Rodney School District $9.3 M

Aero Precision Industries $9.2 M

Tesla Industries $8.1 M

Phase Sensitive Innovations $6.6 M

Agilent Technologies Inc. $4.6 M

Bering Straits Native Corporation $3.6 M

Kalitta Charters $3.2 M

Integrity Tool & Fastener Inc. $2.8 M

CDK Mobile Systems $2.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

DELAWARE

#50 #49 0.1% $553 #51 #46 #44

$0.5 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.7% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

9,924 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$405.5 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

9,924

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Kent 3,455 944 146 1,706 6,251

New Castle 37 456 2,039 561 3,093

Sussex ND 31 471 64

Construction: 5% Research and

Development: 7%

Service: 53%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 36%

Active Duty: 35%

Civilian: 14%

National 

Guard: 27%

Reserve: 23%

22%

10%

36%

32%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

24%

3%

72%

1%

$0.3 $0.3

$0.2

$0.4

$0.2

$0.1

$0.2

$0.1

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 33

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

New Castle

Kent

Sussex

FISCAL YEAR 2018 DELAWARE

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Kent

New Castle

Sussex

(M = millions)

$66.7 M

$57.2 M

$5.1 M

Kent

New Castle

Sussex

$300.0 M

$96.1 M

$8.4 M

New Castle

Kent

Sussex
34 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

U.S. Department of Energy $715.2 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $247.0 M

General Dynamics $233.8 M

Alion Science and Technology $198.9 M

Deloitte $125.8 M

Ernst & Young $93.0 M

CACI $82.0 M

Advantaged Solutions $76.8 M

KPMG $73.8 M

Government of the United States $66.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

#22 #8 1.5% $10,540 #21 #30 #18

$7.4 B SPENT 

IN STATE

5.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $5.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

25,183 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.3 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

25,183

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

District of Columbia 8,076 13,023 2,580 1,504 25,183

Construction: 3%

Research and 

Development: 6%

Service: 70%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 20%

Active Duty: 32%

Civilian: 52%

National 

Guard: 10%

Reserve: 6%

11%

55%

9%

24%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

19%

63%

15%

3%

$4.8 $4.5 $4.5 $4.2 $3.8 $3.7

$4.4

$5.1

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 35

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

District of Columbia

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions) (B = billions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

District of Columbia

(B = billions)

$5.1 B

District of Columbia

District of Columbia

$2.3 B
36 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $3.6 B

Northrop Grumman $1.9 B

Leonardo SpA $669.6 M

General Dynamics $628.6 M

Raytheon $571.2 M

Harris Corp. $563.8 M

Crowley $386.6 M

Honeywell $309.9 M

CAE $219.3 M

Jacobs Engineering Group $212.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

FLORIDA

#5 #23 4.8% $1,132 #5 #5 #5

$24.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.3% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $16.9 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

128,035 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$7.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$7.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

128,035

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Okaloosa 17,084 7,065 102 2,039 26,290

Duval 11,406 8,624 1,881 3,763 25,674

Escambia 11,317 2,494 191 1,058 15,060

Hillsborough 5,762 2,671 482 4,060 12,975

Bay 3,928 2,819 500 483 7,730

Miami-Dade 1,231 1,241 453 3,866 6,791

Orange 228 2,354 350 3,108 6,040

Brevard 1,598 2,328 396 1,260 5,582

Pinellas 65 311 674 1,267 2,317

Palm Beach 75 239 340 1,099 1,753

Construction: 1%

Research and 

Development: 5%

Service: 41% Supplies and 

Equipment: 53%

Active Duty: 47%

Civilian: 25%

National 

Guard: 9%

Reserve: 19%

25%

31%

29%

15%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

41%

35%

2%

$12.7 $12.3 $10.7 $10.2 $10.1

$13.9 $15.0

$16.9

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 37

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Duval

Bay

Okaloosa

Brevard Pinellas

Hillsborough

Palm Beach

Broward

Miami-Dade

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FLORIDA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Orange

Brevard

Hillsborough

Duval

Okaloosa

Pinellas

Miami-Dade

Bay

Broward

Palm Beach

(M = millions, B = billions)

$4.8 B

$3.6 B

$1.6 B

$1.5 B

$1.3 B

$1.2 B

$461.3 M

$412.0 M

$351.0 M

$322.1 M

Santa Rosa

Escambia

Orange

Monroe

Okaloosa

Duval

Hillsborough

Escambia

Bay

Brevard

Orange

Miami-Dade

Santa Rosa

Monroe

$1.8 B

$1.5 B

$826.7 M

$683.1 M

$525.0 M

$329.6 M

$323.3 M

$316.9 M

$102.8 M

$98.6 M

Miami-Dade

Brevard

Orange

Hillsborough

Bay

Okaloosa Duval
38 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $2.3 B

Georgia Tech Research Corp. $335.3 M

General Dynamics $257.5 M

Northrop Grumman $221.7 M

Longbranch Partners $211.9 M

Leidos $147.4 M

DataPath $145.6 M

Honeywell $117.1 M

Scientific Research Corp. $89.9 M

Meggitt $72.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

GEORGIA

#13 #22 2.7% $1,302 #16 #6 #8

$13.7 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.3% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $7.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

126,710 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$6.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$6.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

126,710

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Muscogee 20,293 4,513 224 682 25,712

Houston 3,348 14,634 1,233 1,234 20,449

Liberty 15,098 2,621 500 143 18,362

Richmond 11,478 3,363 597 1,458 16,896

Chatham 4,131 1,178 1,754 484 7,547

Cobb 265 1,299 2,516 3,265 7,345

Lowndes 4,533 510 94 264 5,401

Camden 2,480 2,411 ND ND

Clayton 50 503 446 2,139 3,138

Dougherty 301 2,007 89 115 2,512

Construction: 4%

Research and 

Development: 5%

Service: 38% Supplies and

Equipment: 53%

Active Duty: 52%

Civilian: 27%

National 

Guard: 11%

Reserve:10%

27%

17%

44%

13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

63%

11%

24%

2%

$7.7 $7.5

$5.6 $6.2 $5.3

$9.4

$6.5 $7.3

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 39

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Cherokee

Fulton

Gwinnett

Richmond

Chattahoochee

Liberty

Chatham

Camden

FISCAL YEAR 2018 GEORGIA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Cobb

Houston

Fulton

Richmond

Gwinnett

Chattahoochee

Chatham

Camden

Cherokee

Liberty

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.5 B

$1.0 B

$699.3 M

$484.3 M

$395.8 M

$346.7 M

$341.8 M

$307.4 M

$245.1 M

$192.9 M

Cobb

Clayton

Richmond

Muscogee

Liberty

Chatham

Dougherty

Camden

Lowndes

Houston

Muscogee

Liberty

Richmond

Chatham

Camden

Lowndes

Cobb

Dougherty

Clayton

$1.3 B

$1.1 B

$1.0 B

$913.3 M

$392.6 M

$297.6 M

$286.5 M

$265.8 M

$161.2 M

$117.1 M

Houston

Houston

Cobb
40 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

BAE Systems $158.0 M

Hensel Phelps Construction $152.4 M

Goodfellow Bros. Inc. $63.1 M

Harris Corp. $61.0 M

Matson $55.7 M

AECOM $53.2 M

Allied Pacific Builders Inc. $45.9 M

Syncon $44.3 M

PCL Employees Holdings Ltd $41.5 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $27.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

HAWAII

#23 #2 1.4% $5,050 #32 #9 #9

$7.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

7.7% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $2.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

70,574 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$4.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$4.9 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

70,574

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Honolulu 35,121 19,125 4,647 3,870 62,763

Hawaii 12 166 343 85 606

Kauai 85 157 71 32 345

Maui 19 63 174 ND

Construction: 18%

Research and 

Development: 6%

Service: 69%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 7%

Active Duty: 59%

Civilian: 28%

National 

Guard: 7%

Reserve: 6%

36%

47%

8%

9%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

38%

46%

14%

2%

$2.8

$2.3

$1.7 $1.8

$2.2

$1.8 $2.0 $2.3

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 41

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Kauai

Honolulu

Maui

Hawaii

FISCAL YEAR 2018 HAWAII

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Honolulu

Maui

Kauai

Hawaii

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.1 B

$88.2 M

$73.5 M

$34.8 M

Honolulu

Kauai

Hawaii

Maui

$4.3 B

$22.4 M

$20.8 M

$11.0 M

Kauai

Honolulu

Maui

Hawaii
42 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Brad Hall & Associates $53.8 M

PKL Services $16.0 M

AERO Specialties $15.1 M

Tanadgusix Corp. (TC) $14.3 M

Photronics Inc. $7.0 M

Johnson Controls $6.9 M

General Dynamics $6.7 M

Winspear-Petra JV-2 $4.8 M

Unitech Composites Inc. $3.1 M

Dawn Enterprises $2.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

IDAHO

#48 #48 0.1% $355 #47 #44 #43

$0.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.8% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

10,747 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$407.1 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

10,747

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Ada 80 1,031 2,820 697 4,628

Elmore 3,325 454 250 26 4,055

Kootenai ND 79 138 102

Bannock ND 14 130 136

Canyon ND ND 240 ND

Twin Falls ND ND 78 102

Jerome ND ND 124 ND

Bonneville 23 ND 87 ND

Nez Perce ND ND 95 ND

Clearwater ND 60 27 ND

Construction: 6% Research and 

Development: 5%

Service: 36% Supplies and 

Equipment: 53%

Active Duty: 32%

Civilian: 16%

National 

Guard: 42%

Reserve:10%

14%

8%

40%

38%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

44%

4%

52%

0%

$0.2 $0.2

$0.4

$0.2 $0.2

$0.1

$0.2 $0.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 43

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Bonner

Kootenai

Lewis

Blaine Canyon

Ada

Bonneville

Bingham

Twin Falls

FISCAL YEAR 2018 IDAHO

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Elmore

Bonneville

Ada

Kootenai

Bingham

Canyon

Lewis

Twin Falls

Bonner

Blaine

(M = millions)

$66.2 M

$57.9 M

$53.9 M

$16.4 M

$10.3 M

$2.1 M

$2.0 M

$1.1 M

$858.9 K

$652.8 K

Elmore

Ada

Kootenai

Bannock

Clearwater

Canyon

Bonneville

Twin Falls

Bonner

Latah

$212.4 M

$142.7 M

$9.7 M

$7.2 M

$5.2 M

$5.1 M

$4.2 M

$3.1 M

$3.0 M

$2.8 M

Bonner

Kootenai

Latah Clearwater

Elmore

Bannock

Canyon

Ada

Elmore

Bonneville

Twin Falls
44 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Northrop Grumman $1.3 B

BP $1.1 B

Cardinal Health $518.0 M

SupplyCore $478.1 M

Navistar International $411.3 M

United Technologies $307.4 M

General Dynamics $302.8 M

W.S. Darley and Co. $289.2 M

Alion Science and Technology $259.3 M

AAR $236.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

ILLINOIS

#17 #40 2.0% $790 #14 #15 #19

$10.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.1% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $7.9 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

58,070 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

58,070

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Lake 15,355 1,545 210 4,388 21,498

St. Clair 4,524 4,454 1,137 1,610 11,725

Cook 371 671 2,343 1,925 5,310

Rock Island 339 4,162 208 359 5,068

Sangamon 58 556 2,120 78 2,812

Peoria 39 377 1,804 506 2,726

Will ND 76 131 701

DuPage 48 100 ND 556

Champaign 28 292 279 86 685

Macon ND 51 344 230

Construction: 1%

Research and 

Development: 5%

Service: 16%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 79%

Active Duty: 36%

Civilian: 22%

National 

Guard: 22%

Reserve: 19%

19%

20%

17%

45%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

42%

35%

21%

2%

$5.7

$7.4

$2.5

$3.9

$2.3

$4.1

$5.9

$7.9

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 45

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Rock Island

Peoria

Williamson

Winnebago Boone Lake

Kane Cook

DuPage

FISCAL YEAR 2018 ILLINOIS

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Cook

Lake

DuPage

Winnebago

St. Clair

Williamson

Boone

Peoria

Rock Island

Kane

(M = millions)

$3.2 B

$1.2 B

$1.1 B

$659.7 M

$626.1 M

$273.4 M

$208.6 M

$194.4 M

$187.2 M

$48.9 M

St. Clair

Lake

Rock Island

Cook

Sangamon

Peoria

Champaign

DuPage

Will

Macon

$768.9 M

$512.6 M

$379.9 M

$144.3 M

$105.4 M

$70.6 M

$34.1 M

$27.2 M

$13.7 M

$12.1 M

Rock Island

Will

Champaign

Macon

Sangamon

St. Clair

Lake

DuPage

Cook

Peoria

St. Clair
46 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Rolls-Royce $577.2 M

MacAndrews & Forbes Inc. $530.2 M

Raytheon $436.2 M

AmeriQual Group $202.6 M

ERAPSCO $181.9 M

SAIC $122.2 M

Honeywell $117.9 M

Alion Science and Technology $63.0 M

Talbert Manufacturing Inc. $61.3 M

General Dynamics $49.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

INDIANA

#27 #33 0.9% $691 #27 #26 #29

$4.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $3.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

31,467 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.3 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

31,467

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Marion 282 5,426 2,363 1,328 9,399

Martin 50 4,609 ND ND

Miami 19 500 39 1,821 2,379

Johnson 272 237 1,626 223 2,358

Allen 35 277 1,436 350 2,098

Vigo 22 162 1,016 225 1,425

St. Joseph 74 53 300 356 783

Lake ND 57 538 163

Tippecanoe 68 25 418 138 649

Vanderburgh 61 29 400 142 632

Construction: 1%

Research and

Development: 6%

Service: 31%

Supplies and

Equipment: 62%

Active Duty: 3%

Civilian: 37%

National 

Guard: 43%

Reserve: 17%

26%

38%

13%

23%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

54%

17%

14%

14%

$4.0

$2.9

$2.1 $2.5

$3.0 $2.8

$3.3 $3.3

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 47

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Whitley

Jasper

Allen

Marion

Bartholomew

Martin

Daviess

Vanderburgh

St. Joseph

FISCAL YEAR 2018 INDIANA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Marion

St. Joseph

Martin

Allen

Vanderburgh

Whitley

Jasper

Daviess

Miami

Bartholomew

(M = millions)

$1.1 B

$668.9 M

$448.7 M

$308.4 M

$206.3 M

$187.5 M

$61.3 M

$50.9 M

$39.0 M

$38.3 M

Marion

Martin

Johnson

Miami

Allen

Vigo

St. Joseph

Howard

Lake

Tippecanoe

$481.8 M

$383.7 M

$75.6 M

$67.3 M

$56.8 M

$42.9 M

$17.9 M

$17.8 M

$15.8 M

$14.0 M

Lake Allen

Miami

Howard Tippecanoe

Marion

Johnson

Vigo

St. Joseph

Martin

Miami
48 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Rockwell Collins $1.0 B

American Ordnance $320.0 M

Data Link Solutions $253.3 M

Cobham $79.3 M

Rockwell Collins-ESA Vision Systems $57.5 M

Carver Pump Company $26.7 M

Dexter Apache Holdings Inc. $24.2 M

United Technologies $22.0 M

HNI Corp. $18.1 M

Rosenboom Machine & Tool Inc. $8.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

IOWA

#38 #36 0.5% $730 #35 #41 #47

$2.3 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $2.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,697 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$346.1 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,697

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Polk 92 791 3,049 1,009 4,941

Woodbury ND 304 1,093 56

Linn ND 102 370 274

Scott ND 168 362 216

Black Hawk 26 68 427 95 616

Johnson 43 31 405 136 615

Boone ND 70 371 ND

Dubuque ND 30 233 71

Webster ND 41 219 22

Des Moines ND 45 100 78

Construction: 1%

Research and 

Development: 5%

Service: 14%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 80%

Active Duty: 2%

Civilian: 14%

National Guard: 67%

Reserve: 18%

30%

38%

25%

7%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

78%

3%

19%

0%

$1.1 $1.1 $1.0

$1.3 $1.2

$1.4 $1.7

$2.0

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 49

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Osceola

Story Linn

Polk Johnson

Scott

Muscatine

Warren

Louisa

Des Moines

FISCAL YEAR 2018 IOWA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Linn

Des Moines

Scott

Polk

Muscatine

Johnson

Louisa

Story

Osceola

Warren

(M = millions)

$1.4 B

$322.6 M

$95.3 M

$42.7 M

$31.3 M

$27.2 M

$14.2 M

$12.7 M

$8.8 M

$3.8 M

Polk

Woodbury

Scott

Black Hawk

Boone

Linn

Johnson

Webster

Story

Dubuque

$152.9 M

$44.2 M

$27.3 M

$19.0 M

$17.3 M

$16.9 M

$13.0 M

$8.4 M

$7.0 M

$5.6 M

Dubuque

Webster

Black Hawk

Woodbury Linn Boone Story

Polk

Johnson

Scott
50 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Textron $185.3 M

Leading Technology Composites $75.9 M

Northrop Grumman $75.2 M

EXI $71.2 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $24.2 M

D-J Engineering Inc. $18.5 M

Day & Zimmermann Group $18.3 M

General Electric $17.6 M

Black & Veatch Construction Inc. $16.8 M

Federal Contracting Inc. $14.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

KANSAS

#34 #30 0.6% $1,057 #40 #21 #20

$3.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.8% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $1.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

38,752 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.0 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.0 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

38,752

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Geary 15,058 2,692 150 135 18,035

Sedgwick 2,856 995 1,755 1,575 7,181

Leavenworth 3,408 2,407 218 367 6,400

Shawnee 36 650 1,844 380 2,910

Johnson 29 88 487 343 947

Riley 32 106 229 187 554

Saline ND 56 205 66

Ellis ND 13 67 121

Wyandotte ND 25 150 ND

Douglas 38 20 43 70 171

Construction: 8% Research and

Development: 1%

Service: 42%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 48%

Active Duty: 55%

Civilian: 19%

National 

Guard: 17%

Reserve: 9%

52%

7%

25%

15%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

80%

1%

18%

1%

$1.8 $1.7

$1.2

$0.9

$1.5

$1.0 $1.0 $1.1

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 51

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Riley Leavenworth

Geary

Wyandotte

Butler

Sedgwick Cowley

Labette

FISCAL YEAR 2018 KANSAS

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Sedgwick

Leavenworth

Johnson

Geary

Butler

Cowley

Riley

Labette

Wyandotte

Shawnee

(M = millions)

$518.8 M

$177.5 M

$128.7 M

$83.0 M

$34.4 M

$19.3 M

$18.3 M

$18.2 M

$12.8 M

$12.4 M

Geary

Leavenworth

Sedgwick

Shawnee

Johnson

Riley

Saline

Wyandotte

Douglas

Ellis

$949.9 M

$521.5 M

$317.3 M

$111.4 M

$24.0 M

$22.5 M

$10.6 M

$8.4 M

$6.8 M

$4.4 M

Riley Leavenworth

Geary

Shawnee

Wyandotte

Ellis

Douglas Johnson

Saline

Johnson

Shawnee

Sedgwick
52 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Humana $5.2 B

Lockheed Martin $567.2 M

Raytheon $558.5 M

Bechtel Parsons Blue Grass JV $262.7 M

Boeing $144.4 M

BAE Systems $105.8 M

UPS $85.2 M

Southeastern Kentucky Rehabilitation Industries Inc. $61.0 M

SourceAmerica $46.0 M

SAIC $43.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

KENTUCKY

#14 #9 2.2% $2,455 #13 #17 #14

$11.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

5.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $8.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

54,837 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.8 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

54,837

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Christian 26,498 2,629 31 177 29,335

Hardin 5,459 4,459 129 2,588 12,635

Jefferson 132 1,178 1,849 632 3,791

Madison ND 989 675 24

Franklin 20 289 1,040 ND

Fayette 71 105 234 561 971

Boone ND 21 562 ND

Campbell ND 24 ND 389

Muhlenberg ND 70 241 ND

McCracken ND 13 92 181

Service: 85%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 14%

Construction: 1%

Research and Development: 0%

Active Duty: 59%

Civilian: 19%

National 

Guard: 14%

Reserve: 9%

14%

8%

2%

76%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

94%

1%

3%

2%

$5.3 $5.6 $5.6 $5.9 $5.4 $5.1 $5.9

$8.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 53

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Boone

Kenton Carter

Jefferson

Fayette

Hardin Menifee

Madison

Laurel

Christian

FISCAL YEAR 2018 KENTUCKY

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Jefferson

Fayette

Hardin

Christian

Madison

Laurel

Boone

Menifee

Kenton

Carter

(M = millions, B = billions)

$6.1 B

$667.4 M

$445.5 M

$410.9 M

$289.3 M

$61.2 M

$42.9 M

$42.3 M

$18.5 M

$14.5 M

Christian

Hardin

Jefferson

Madison

Franklin

Fayette

Boone

Muhlenberg

Campbell

McCracken

$1.7 B

$727.1 M

$161.1 M

$71.4 M

$55.1 M

$29.2 M

$8.3 M

$8.0 M

$5.8 M

$5.5 M

Boone

Campbell

Franklin

Hardin

McCracken Muhlenberg

Christian

Madison

Jefferson

Fayette
54 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Textron $159.0 M

Placid Refining Company $113.7 M

Cubic Corp. $73.1 M

Gulf Island Fabrication Inc. $63.6 M

AECOM $51.1 M

Gravois Aluminum Boats $46.7 M

JGILS $35.5 M

Swiftships $25.7 M

PRIDE Industries $24.2 M

Threat Defense $22.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

LOUISIANA

#36 #39 0.6% $627 #37 #23 #26

$2.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.1% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $1.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

37,598 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.6 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

37,598

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Vernon 7,823 1,328 125 25 9,301

Bossier 5,163 1,422 201 2,160 8,946

Orleans 908 1,607 2,740 2,572 7,827

Rapides ND 426 1,430 ND

East Baton Rouge 152 104 438 644 1,338

Tangipahoa ND 103 729 ND

Iberville 63 38 680 47 828

Plaquemines 83 640 ND ND

Calcasieu ND 45 340 183

Lafayette 42 48 329 83 502

Construction: 4%

Research and 

Development: 3%

Service: 42%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 50%

Active Duty: 38%

Civilian: 16%

National 

Guard: 30%

Reserve: 15%

32%

39%

10%

20%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

62%

11%

26%

1%

$1.2

$2.1

$1.3 $1.3 $1.5

$1.1 $1.1 $1.3

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 55

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Bossier

Vernon

West Baton Rouge St. Tammany

Orleans

St. Mary

Lafourche

Iberia

Terrebonne

Jefferson

FISCAL YEAR 2018 LOUISIANA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Orleans

Vernon

Bossier

West Baton Rouge

Terrebonne

Jefferson

Lafourche

Iberia

St. Tammany

St. Mary

(M = millions)

$328.2 M

$295.2 M

$119.0 M

$114.1 M

$71.8 M

$61.1 M

$53.4 M

$48.4 M

$35.9 M

$27.0 M

Vernon

Bossier

Orleans

Rapides

Plaquemines

East Baton Rouge

Tangipahoa

Iberville

Lafayette

Avoyelles

$510.8 M

$483.1 M

$342.1 M

$55.9 M

$44.4 M

$36.1 M

$27.9 M

$22.8 M

$14.0 M

$11.4 M

Bossier

Rapides

Vernon

Avoyelles Tangipahoa

East Baton Rouge

Iberville Lafayette

Plaquemines

Orleans
56 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

General Dynamics $482.5 M

Martin’s Point Health Care $355.5 M

Innovyze Inc. $31.8 M

Engineered Construction Services Inc. $30.3 M

Asturian Group $22.6 M

Cianbro Companies $21.4 M

Precision Partners LLC $19.5 M

City of Bangor $17.7 M

Methuen Construction $16.8 M

Q.E.D. Systems $15.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

MAINE

#39 #15 0.4% $1,422 #38 #43 #36

$1.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $1.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,157 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$701.8 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,157

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

York ND 6,682 113 194

Penobscot ND 404 1,546 149

Kennebec 39 186 644 ND

Aroostook ND 596 108 ND

Cumberland 22 73 412 164 671

Sagadahoc 20 309 ND ND

Androscoggin ND 18 99 97

Oxford ND ND 98 ND

Washington ND 67 ND ND

Somerset ND ND 63 ND

Service: 56%

Supplies and

Equipment: 39%

Research and 

Construction: 3% Development: 2%

Active Duty: 1%

Civilian: 69%

National 

Guard: 25%

Reserve: 5% 

4%

62%

1%

34%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

22%

60%

12%

6%

$5.1

$1.7 $2.1

$1.4 $1.4 $1.7

$2.7

$1.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 57

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MAINE

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Sagadahoc

Cumberland

York

Washington

Penobscot

Kennebec

Waldo

Oxford

Aroostook

Androscoggin

(M = millions)

$447.8 M

$372.3 M

$278.5 M

$30.6 M

$28.9 M

$22.2 M

$5.4 M

$4.1 M

$3.5 M

$3.2 M

York

Penobscot

Kennebec

Sagadahoc

Aroostook

Cumberland

Washington

Androscoggin

Hancock

Oxford

$513.1 M

$65.0 M

$33.0 M

$32.0 M

$30.3 M

$16.4 M

$4.4 M

$3.1 M

$2.2 M

$1.3 M

Aroostook

Penobscot

Oxford Washington

Kennebec

Androscoggin

Hancock

Cumberland

Sagadahoc

York

Aroostook

Penobscot

Androscoggin Oxford

Cumberland

York Sagadahoc

Kennebec

Washington

Waldo
58 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Northrop Grumman $1.5 B

Lockheed Martin $1.4 B

Johns Hopkins University $852.3 M

BAE Systems $539.4 M

General Dynamics $512.9 M

Textron $488.7 M

Leidos $474.1 M

Johns Hopkins Health System Corp. $414.5 M

Smartronix $410.2 M

Booz Allen Hamilton $393.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

MARYLAND

#4 #6 5.0% $4,169 #4 #8 #4

$25.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

6.0% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $17.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

92,385 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$7.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$7.4 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

92,385

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Anne Arundel 12,579 8,277 432 3,628 24,916

Prince George’s 4,383 4,700 1,080 4,811 14,974

Harford 866 10,607 779 480 12,732

St. Mary’s 2,291 10,211 70 38 12,610

Montgomery 4,849 5,961 190 662 11,662

Baltimore 82 455 2,724 706 3,967

Frederick 1,215 2,231 109 235 3,790

Charles 555 2,156 105 101 2,917

Baltimore City 73 1,020 471 929 2,493

Allegany 1,000 ND 53 138

Construction: 4% Research and 

Development: 16%

Service: 51%

Supplies and

Equipment: 29%

Active Duty: 31%

Civilian: 50%

National 

Guard: 7%

Reserve: 13%

27%

39%

11%

23%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

38%

36%

17%

9%

$10.9

$15.1

$10.3

$14.2 $13.9 $15.0 $15.3

$17.8

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 59

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Baltimore Harford

Frederick

Baltimore City

Howard

Anne Arundel

Montgomery

Prince George’s

Charles

St. Mary’s

MARYLAND FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Anne Arundel

St. Mary’s

Montgomery

Harford

Baltimore

Howard

Baltimore City

Frederick

Charles

(M = millions, B = billions)

$3.6 B

$3.0 B

$2.7 B

$2.4 B

$1.8 B

$1.3 B

Prince George’s

$956.4 M

$590.3 M

$441.7 M

$405.4 M

Anne Arundel

St. Mary’s

Harford

Montgomery

Frederick

Charles

Baltimore City

Baltimore

Allegany

$1.9 B

$1.3 B

$1.2 B

$1.1 B

Prince George’s

$1.0 B

$310.7 M

$236.4 M

$136.7 M

$116.5 M

$88.8 M

Allegany

Baltimore Harford

Frederick

Baltimore City

Anne Arundel

Montgomery

Prince George’s

Charles

St. Mary’s
60 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Raytheon $4.7 B

General Electric $1.6 B

General Dynamics $1.1 B

Massachusetts Institute of Technology $1.0 B

Charles Stark Draper Laboratory $461.5 M

Noble Sales & Logisitics $389.1 M

MITRE $339.1 M

United Technologies $280.7 M

QinetiQ Group $162.2 M

Brighton Marine Health Center $143.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

MASSACHUSETTS

#12 #20 2.9% $2,091 #9 #32 #32

$14.4 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.5% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $13.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

23,510 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.1 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

23,510

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Middlesex 1,202 4,258 2,043 2,073 9,576

Hampden 169 1,084 1,546 2,753 5,552

Barnstable 91 437 1,948 ND

Suffolk 440 416 138 310 1,304

Plymouth 28 40 510 448 1,026

Bristol ND 60 428 496

Worcester 21 104 568 220 913

Essex 13 151 386 39 589

Norfolk ND 18 254 260

Hampshire 11 17 188 ND

Construction: 0%

Research and 

Development: 20%

Service: 21%

Supplies and

Equipment: 58%

Active Duty: 9% 

Civilian: 28%

National Guard: 35%

Reserve: 28%

31%

26%

26%

17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

52%

8%

36%

3%

$12.2 $11.3 $10.6 $9.2

$5.4

$9.2 $9.8

$13.4

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 61

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Essex

Berkshire

Middlesex

Hampshire Worcester Suffolk

Plymouth

Norfolk

Bristol

Barnstable

MASSACHUSETTS FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Middlesex

Essex

Bristol

Plymouth

Norfolk

Berkshire

Suffolk

Worcester

Barnstable

Hampshire

(M = millions)

$6.1 B

$4.4 B

$787.6 M

$527.8 M

$473.1 M

$329.5 M

$292.5 M

$168.4 M

$155.0 M

$112.0 M

Middlesex

Hampden

Barnstable

Suffolk

Essex

Plymouth

Worcester

Bristol

Norfolk

Berkshire

$591.3 M

$171.3 M

$91.9 M

$82.5 M

$21.8 M

$21.8 M

$20.4 M

$19.9 M

$15.4 M

$7.7 M

Essex

Berkshire

Middlesex

Worcester Suffolk

Hampden

Plymouth

Norfolk

Bristol

Barnstable
62 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

General Dynamics $1.5 B

BAE Systems $429.6 M

L3 Technologies $174.4 M

Peckham Vocational Industries $148.9 M

Loc Performance Products $143.0 M

ManTech $125.8 M

Avon Rubber $71.4 M

Aircraft Appliances and Equipment Ltd $70.1 M

AAR $51.2 M

General Electric $50.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

MICHIGAN

#26 #43 1.1% $538 #22 #29 #30

$5.4 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.0% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $4.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

25,719 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

25,719

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Macomb 255 6,494 1,486 1,164 9,399

Calhoun 49 1,380 958 476 2,863

Wayne 190 312 1,318 430 2,250

Kalamazoo 15 84 928 734 1,761

Kent 51 82 722 266 1,121

Clinton ND ND 837 169

Oakland 11 312 184 496 1,003

Ingham 167 426 131 22 746

Saginaw ND ND 335 252

Eaton 31 77 477 ND

Construction: 0%

Research and 

Development: 5%

Service: 16%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 79%

Active Duty: 4%

Civilian: 37%

National 

Guard: 41%

Reserve: 18%

71%

10%

4%

14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

72%

9%

13%

6%

$2.7

$3.7

$2.2 $2.2

$1.7

$2.6 $3.0

$4.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 63

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Dickinson

Wexford

Muskegon

Kent

Ingham

Wayne

Washtenaw

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MICHIGAN

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Macomb

Wayne

Oakland

Kent

Muskegon

Washtenaw

Wexford

Dickinson

Ingham

Clinton

(M = millions)

$2.4 B

$250.8 M

$241.4 M

$218.4 M

$174.2 M

$156.9 M

$121.4 M

$95.4 M

$82.9 M

$82.3 M

Macomb

Calhoun

Wayne

Clinton

Ingham

Oakland

Kalamazoo

Kent

Eaton

Washtenaw

$706.2 M

$147.7 M

$69.1 M

$41.5 M

$38.8 M

$38.3 M

$32.1 M

$22.6 M

$17.0 M

$14.3 M

Clinton

Macomb

Oakland

Ingham

Eaton

Kalamazoo

Calhoun

Kent

Washtenaw

Wayne

Macomb

Clinton Oakland
64 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

UnitedHealth Group $1.1 B

Northrop Grumman $398.6 M

Honeywell $336.5 M

Benchmark Electronics Inc. $326.2 M

BAE Systems $277.3 M

Cummins $128.2 M

U.S. Bancorp $57.4 M

United Technologies $50.8 M

General Dynamics $41.9 M

3M $35.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

MINNESOTA

#31 #46 0.7% $641 #28 #33 #40

$3.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.0% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $3.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

21,517 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$543.3 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

21,517

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Hennepin 249 613 1,815 3,516 6,193

Ramsey 41 882 1,672 801 3,396

St. Louis ND 341 1,760 129

Morrison 69 377 1,335 26 1,807

Dakota ND 52 964 ND

Stearns ND 94 516 148

Washington ND ND 627 ND

Blue Earth 22 13 180 133 348

Wright ND ND 177 139

Crow Wing 24 19 129 102 274

Service: 40%

Supplies and

Equipment: 57%

Construction: 0% Research and

Development: 4%

Active Duty: 2%

Civilian: 12%

National Guard: 61%

Reserve: 24%

18%

25%

13%

43%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

72%

6%

21%

1%

$1.1 $1.0

$1.9

$3.9 $3.7 $4.0 $4.3

$3.1

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 65

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

St. Louis

Wilkin

Morrison

Sherburne Anoka

Hennepin

Scott Dakota

Olmsted

MINNESOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Hennepin

Anoka

Olmsted

Dakota

Ramsey

Sherburne

St. Louis

Scott

Morrison

Wilkin

(M = millions)

$2.0 B

$431.8 M

$345.4 M

$74.7 M

$67.9 M

$20.4 M

$10.3 M

$8.9 M

$6.8 M

$3.7 M

Hennepin

Ramsey

St. Louis

Morrison

Dakota

Stearns

Washington

Blue Earth

Crow Wing

Wright

$189.2 M

$110.4 M

$63.6 M

$50.6 M

$25.7 M

$16.3 M

$8.9 M

$6.1 M

$5.9 M

$5.0 M

St. Louis

Crow Wing

Stearns Morrison

Wright

Washington

Dakota

Blue Earth

Hennepin Ramsey

Ramsey
66 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Huntington Ingalls $4.6 B

L3 Technologies $916.7 M

Olin Corp. $132.7 M

Weeks Marine $112.8 M

Vision Technologies Systems $84.0 M

Raytheon $71.4 M

Leidos $47.5 M

Airbus $46.3 M

Cooper Crouse-Hinds $30.8 M

Hewlett-Packard $23.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

MISSISSIPPI

#20 #3 1.7% $2,774 #17 #22 #23

$8.3 B SPENT 

IN STATE

7.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $6.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

37,846 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.7 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

37,846

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Harrison 7,716 2,265 956 2,132 13,069

Lauderdale 1,063 650 1,455 280 3,448

Warren ND 2,489 109 277

Hinds 48 422 1,344 441 2,255

Lowndes 1,433 583 91 96 2,203

Hancock 559 1,299 48 ND

Rankin ND 324 1,359 ND

Forrest 310 399 606 193 1,508

Lee 30 95 460 125 710

Tippah 659 ND 45 ND

Service: 30%

Supplies and

Equipment: 67%

Construction: 0% Research and

Development: 3%

Active Duty: 32%

Civilian: 25%

National 

Guard: 32%

Reserve: 11%

7%

79%

10%

5%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

41%

24%

34%

1%

$5.3 $5.2

$3.0

$2.2 $2.1 $2.6

$4.8

$6.6

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 67

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Lafayette

Lowndes

Madison

Scott

Warren Lauderdale

Hinds

Jackson

Harrison

Hancock

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MISSISSIPPI

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Jackson

Madison

Harrison

Lowndes

Lafayette

Hancock

Scott

Warren

Hinds

Lauderdale

(M = millions)

$4.7 B

$886.0 M

$333.3 M

$146.9 M

$137.4 M

$97.2 M

$71.4 M

$63.7 M

$37.8 M

$33.8 M

Harrison

Warren

Hancock

Lowndes

Lauderdale

Hinds

Forrest

Rankin

Jackson

Tippah

$572.6 M

$210.1 M

$148.2 M

$130.7 M

$124.3 M

$87.1 M

$68.0 M

$48.2 M

$47.7 M

$33.6 M

Tippah

Rankin

Lauderdale

Hinds

Forrest

Jackson

Harrison

Hancock

Lowndes

Warren
68 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Boeing $10.2 B

Express Scripts $661.5 M

World Wide Technology $294.0 M

Northrop Grumman $288.7 M

GKN America Corp. $288.0 M

Honeywell $269.2 M

Leonardo SpA $250.6 M

Cerner Corporation $117.0 M

Magellan Health $68.2 M

Eaglepicher Technologies LLC $68.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

MISSOURI

#11 #10 3.0% $2,475 #7 #19 #27

$15.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

4.7% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $13.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

43,928 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

43,928

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Pulaski 12,074 3,063 346 440 15,923

Johnson 3,790 1,062 1,099 1,065 7,016

Jackson 115 797 729 1,855 3,496

St. Louis 66 486 1,414 1,111 3,077

Greene 23 277 966 605 1,871

Buchanan 17 325 1,313 70 1,725

St. Louis City 252 756 77 567 1,652

Cole 27 357 991 87 1,462

St. Charles ND 77 ND 856

Cass ND 16 228 442

Service: 17%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 81%

Construction: 0% Research and

Development: 2%

Active Duty: 38%

Civilian: 18%

National 

Guard: 26%

Reserve: 17%

8%

35%

44%

14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

70%

8%

20%

1%

$8.9

$13.1

$8.1 $8.6

$6.8

$9.9

$6.9

$13.6

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 69

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Clay

Jackson

St. Charles

Johnson St. Louis

St. Louis City

Pulaski

Dent

Greene

Jasper

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MISSOURI

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

St. Louis

Jackson

Pulaski

Clay

Johnson

Jasper

St. Charles

St. Louis City

Greene

Dent

(M = millions)

$11.9 B

$678.2 M

$225.5 M

$167.0 M

$133.6 M

$127.9 M

$114.5 M

$53.5 M

$30.4 M

$29.3 M

Pulaski

Johnson

Jackson

St. Louis City

St. Louis

Buchanan

Cole

Greene

St. Charles

Platte

$580.8 M

$309.9 M

$115.5 M

$90.7 M

$82.5 M

$65.6 M

$60.5 M

$40.4 M

$24.4 M

$11.2 M

Buchanan

Platte St. Charles

Johnson St. Louis

Cole

Jackson St. Louis City

Pulaski

Greene
70 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

S&K Technologies $18.0 M

Fort Peck Manufacturing & West Electronics JV $17.4 M

Swank Enterprises $17.3 M

T & L Sales $17.3 M

Integrated Security Solutions $10.3 M

2101 LLC $7.8 M

Montana State University $6.0 M

CM Manufacturing $5.8 M

Resodyn Acoustic Mixers $4.9 M

BDS Supply $4.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

MONTANA

#49 #42 0.1% $511 #48 #48 #46

$0.5 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.1% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

9,019 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$346.8 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

9,019

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Cascade 3,201 879 995 74 5,149

Lewis and Clark ND 347 1,002 285

Yellowstone 36 20 315 296 667

Missoula 30 25 184 147 386

Gallatin ND ND 231 ND

Flathead ND ND 181 14

Silver Bow ND 19 71 42

Park ND ND 79 ND

Valley ND 45 31 ND

Custer ND ND 73 ND

Construction: 10%

Research and 

Development: 6%

Service: 35%

Supplies and

Equipment: 49%

Active Duty: 37%

Civilian: 16%

National 

Guard: 38%

Reserve: 10%

40%

5%

32%

23%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

41%

2%

56%

1%

$0.3

$0.2

$0.1

$0.2

$0.1 $0.1

$0.1

$0.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 71

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Flathead Roosevelt Pondera

Lake Richland

Lewis and Clark

Cascade

Missoula

Silver Bow

FISCAL YEAR 2018 MONTANA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Cascade

Lake

Gallatin

Richland

Flathead

Missoula

Pondera

Silver Bow

Lewis and Clark

Roosevelt

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$79.9 M

$19.4 M

$19.3 M

$17.5 M

$17.0 M

$10.0 M

$7.4 M

$6.7 M

$5.6 M

$3.9 M

Cascade

Lewis and Clark

Yellowstone

Missoula

Flathead

Lincoln

Gallatin

Silver Bow

Valley

Park

$240.6 M

$55.7 M

$13.0 M

$8.1 M

$5.4 M

$5.1 M

$4.6 M

$4.4 M

$4.1 M

$874.6 K

Lincoln

Flathead Valley

Cascade

Missoula

Yellowstone

Gallatin

Park

Silver Bow

Gallatin

Lewis and Clark
72 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Enterprise Services $77.8 M

Northrop Grumman $51.5 M

Sterling Computers $28.0 M

McCallie Associates $26.6 M

National Strategic Research Institute $23.8 M

Red River Computer Company $19.9 M

BAE Systems $18.0 M

Client/Server Software Solutions Inc. $15.5 M

Strategic Professional Resources Inc. $14.9 M

Raytheon $14.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NEBRASKA

#41 #34 0.3% $790 #42 #37 #34

$1.5 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.6 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

16,634 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$889.8 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

16,634

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Sarpy 6,120 2,600 81 624 9,425

Lancaster 36 505 2,096 241 2,878

Douglas 90 899 333 639 1,961

Saunders ND 29 476 ND

Hall ND 33 255 ND

Adams ND 22 173 33

Dodge ND ND ND 206

Buffalo ND ND 133 56

Platte ND ND 120 51

Madison ND 12 92 26

Construction: 3% Research and

Development: 8%

Service: 73%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 17%

Active Duty: 38%

Civilian: 25%

National 

Guard: 25%

Reserve: 12%

6%

2%

86%

7%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

36%

6%

58%

1%

$0.7

$0.3

$0.9

$0.6 $0.7

$0.6 $0.7 $0.6

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 73

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Thurston

Madison

Cheyenne

Douglas

Sarpy

Lancaster

Hall

Adams Kearney

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEBRASKA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Sarpy

Douglas

Madison

Lancaster

Saunders

Cheyenne

Kearney

Thurston

Adams

Hall

(M = millions)

$506.8 M

$55.1 M

$23.6 M

$22.2 M

$4.2 M

$4.0 M

$2.7 M

$2.6 M

$2.3 M

$2.3 M

Sarpy

Douglas

Lancaster

Saunders

Hall

Buffalo

Cedar

Adams

Dodge

Platte

$649.2 M

$99.8 M

$89.8 M

$12.8 M

$7.8 M

$5.8 M

$4.2 M

$3.9 M

$3.6 M

$2.6 M

Cedar

Dodge

Platte

Saunders

Douglas

Buffalo Hall Sarpy

Adams

Lancaster

Saunders
74 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Sierra Nevada Corp. $1.0 B

MSATSL $116.9 M

M1 Support Services $103.2 M

AECOM $82.3 M

JT4 $77.8 M

Day & Zimmermann Group $66.6 M

J.E. Dunn Construction $50.0 M

Draken International Inc. $45.0 M

Cerberus Capital Management $41.2 M

Korte Construction Co. (KCC) $28.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NEVADA

#33 #29 0.6% $1,023 #33 #34 #31

$3.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.8% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $2.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

21,280 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.1 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

21,280

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Clark 10,074 1,707 1,906 3,162 16,849

Washoe 55 378 1,827 123 2,383

Churchill 894 285 81 44 1,304

Carson City ND 197 394 ND

Mineral ND 44 ND ND

White Pine ND ND 35 ND

Elko ND ND 22 ND

Storey ND ND ND ND

Douglas ND ND ND ND

Pershing ND ND ND ND

Construction: 4%

Research and

Development: 5%

Service: 63%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 28%

Active Duty: 52%

Civilian: 12%

National 

Guard: 20%

Reserve: 16%

10%

13%

61%

17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

24%

9%

66%

1%

$1.5

$1.2

$2.0

$1.4 $1.3 $1.4 $1.6

$2.0

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 75

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Elko

Churchill

Lyon

Storey

Carson City

Nye

Douglas Mineral

Clark

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEVADA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Washoe

Clark

Churchill

Storey

Mineral

Douglas

Lyon

Carson City

Nye

Elko

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$1.0 B

$656.8 M

$197.5 M

$68.4 M

$67.6 M

$19.0 M

$17.8 M

$8.4 M

$5.9 M

$479.2 K

Clark

Churchill

Washoe

Carson City

Mineral

Storey

White Pine

Douglas

Elko

Pershing

$873.0 M

$85.0 M

$66.8 M

$30.0 M

$3.4 M

$681.9 K

$302.8 K

$293.8 K

$252.1 K

$107.9 K

Elko

Washoe

Pershing

White Pine

Churchill

Carson City

Mineral

Clark

Washoe

Storey

Douglas
76 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

BAE Systems $1.4 B

L3 Technologies $259.5 M

Safran Optics 1 $66.0 M

Red River Computer Company $65.8 M

Elbit Systems $38.4 M

Creare $28.2 M

Teledyne Technologies $27.6 M

Cobham $25.9 M

Lyme Computer Systems $18.6 M

Sig Sauer Inc. $17.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NEW HAMPSHIRE

#37 #14 0.5% $1,988 #30 #50 #50

$2.7 B SPENT 

IN STATE

3.1% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $2.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

6,281 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$241.6 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

6,281

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Rockingham 361 450 1,164 1,067 3,042

Hillsborough 50 176 606 ND

Merrimack ND 192 636 ND

Grafton ND 238 160 ND

Strafford 12 12 88 272 384

Cheshire ND ND ND 60

Coos ND ND 63 ND

Belknap ND ND ND ND

Construction: 0% Research and

Development: 16%

Service: 8%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 76%

Active Duty: 17%

Civilian: 17%

National 

Guard: 43%

Reserve: 22%

23%

34%

32%

11%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

49%

22%

27%

3%

$1.2 $1.5 $1.7

$1.2 $1.1 $1.1

$1.9

$2.5

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 77

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Coos

Grafton

Carroll

Belknap

Merrimack Sullivan

Strafford

Hillsborough Rockingham

Cheshire

NEW HAMPSHIRE FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands. M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Hillsborough

Rockingham

Grafton

Sullivan

Strafford

Cheshire

Merrimack

Belknap

Coos

Carroll

(K = thousands. M = millions)

$1.7 B

$559.7 M

$90.4 M

$68.2 M

$23.8 M

$23.6 M

$12.0 M

$12.0 M

$348.0 K

$16.6 K

Rockingham

Merrimack

Hillsborough

Grafton

Strafford

Cheshire

Coos

Belknap

$103.1 M

$36.3 M

$28.1 M

$19.5 M

$7.1 M

$984.4 K

$796.4 K

$309.8 K

Coos

Grafton

Belknap

Merrimack

Rockingham

Cheshire

Hillsborough

Strafford
78 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $1.7 B

SAIC $660.5 M

Harris Corp. $542.0 M

BAE Systems $181.6 M

TransDigm Group $171.7 M

Total S.A. $96.5 M

Triman Industries $77.2 M

Brighton Cromwell $77.1 M

Data Systems Analysts $76.3 M

Chugach Alaska Corp. $63.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NEW JERSEY

#21 #38 1.5% $843 #20 #24 #22

$7.5 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $5.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

33,444 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.7 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

33,444

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Burlington 5,204 2,648 1,774 6,618 16,244

Morris 131 4,188 734 320 5,373

Ocean 283 2,295 782 37 3,397

Atlantic ND 324 1,374 96

Monmouth 267 314 514 468

Camden 34 77 333 268 712

Hudson ND 90 308 252

Bergen ND 28 405 131

Essex 69 33 433 ND

Mercer 25 80 213 177 495

Construction: 2% Research and

Development: 12%

Service: 18%

Supplies and

Equipment: 68%

Active Duty: 18%

Civilian: 31%

National 

Guard: 25%

Reserve: 26%

19%

32%

12%

38%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

47%

17%

34%

2%

$7.5

$5.4

$4.4

$5.2

$4.1

$5.5

$4.5

$5.8

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

1,563
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 79

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Passaic

Bergen

Morris

Essex

Union

Monmouth Mercer

Burlington

Ocean

Camden

NEW JERSEY FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Burlington

Essex

Passaic

Morris

Camden

Union

Ocean

Mercer

Monmouth

Bergen

(M = millions)

$2.1 B

$736.0 M

$735.0 M

$678.4 M

$315.7 M

$193.8 M

$175.0 M

$168.5 M

$161.1 M

$122.6 M

Burlington

Morris

Ocean

Monmouth

Atlantic

Camden

Mercer

Middlesex

Hudson

Essex

$767.8 M

$484.2 M

$248.6 M

$65.5 M

$52.9 M

$17.3 M

$15.9 M

$14.0 M

$13.5 M

$13.3 M

Middlesex Hudson

Monmouth

Mercer

Camden

Atlantic

Morris

Essex

Burlington

Ocean
80 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Honeywell $1.2 B

Los Alamos National Security, LLC $112.0 M

Westwind Computer Products Inc. $108.0 M

Applied Research Associates $95.3 M

K.L. House Construction Co. $71.6 M

Trax International $63.5 M

Raytheon $52.2 M

Lockheed Martin $48.3 M

CAE $47.6 M

Boeing $45.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NEW MEXICO

#28 #12 0.8% $1,953 #29 #31 #28

$4.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

4.0% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $2.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

23,989 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.3 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

23,989

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Bernalillo 3,460 3,058 1,262 804 8,584

Curry 4,650 485 45 31 5,211

Otero 4,035 883 59 86 5,063

Dona Ana 345 1,663 516 180 2,704

Santa Fe 13 228 535 167 943

Sandoval ND 19 632 ND

Chaves ND 12 169 ND

Valencia ND ND 179 ND

San Juan ND ND 123 ND

Rio Arriba ND 14 70 ND

Construction: 5%

Research and

Development: 16%

Service: 73%

Supplies and

Equipment: 7%

Active Duty: 52%

Civilian: 27%

National 

Guard: 16%

Reserve: 5%

11%

29%

46%

14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

26%

2%

70%

2%

$1.3 $1.5

$2.2 $2.2 $2.1 $2.2 $2.4

$2.8

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 81

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

San Juan

Sandoval

Santa Fe

Los Alamos

Bernalillo

Curry

Roosevelt

Socorro

Otero

Dona Ana

NEW MEXICO FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Bernalillo

Dona Ana

Otero

Curry

Los Alamos

Sandoval

Santa Fe

Socorro

Roosevelt

San Juan

(M = millions)

$2.0 B

$226.6 M

$202.2 M

$119.1 M

$112.7 M

$38.4 M

$16.3 M

$6.8 M

$1.0 M

$551.6 K

Bernalillo

Curry

Otero

Dona Ana

Santa Fe

Sandoval

Chaves

Valencia

San Juan

Socorro

$525.7 M

$294.4 M

$278.4 M

$165.8 M

$42.1 M

$12.6 M

$4.7 M

$2.3 M

$2.3 M

$2.0 M

San Juan

Sandoval

Curry Valencia

Socorro

Chaves

Bernalillo Santa Fe

Otero

Dona Ana
82 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $1.2 B

Harris Corp. $1.1 B

Northrop Grumman $361.0 M

BAE Systems $293.3 M

Moog $285.5 M

Interpublic Group of Companies $253.3 M

SRC $226.0 M

GLOBALFOUNDRIES $190.8 M

L3 Technologies $127.7 M

St. Vincent’s Catholic Medical Centers of NY $106.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NEW YORK

#16 #51 2.1% $530 #15 #13 #16

$10.4 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.6% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $7.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

59,725 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.7 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

59,725

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Jefferson 14,855 2,174 164 247 17,440

Orange 1,777 2,514 1,573 780 6,644

Niagara 12 540 800 1,680 3,032

Onondaga 113 519 1,575 687 2,894

Oneida 68 1,770 611 319 2,768

Queens 80 97 575 1,932 2,684

Albany 233 1,261 979 31 2,504

Schenectady 18 281 1,483 663 2,445

Nassau 373 267 414 1,334 2,388

Suffolk 43 367 1,328 265 2,003

Construction: 2%

Research and

Development: 8%

Service: 18%

Supplies and

Equipment: 72%

Active Duty: 33%

Civilian: 19%

National 

Guard: 26%

Reserve: 22%

31%

34%

12%

22%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

71%

10%

16%

3%

$6.9 $7.6

$5.9

$7.3 $7.6

$6.3 $6.9 $7.7

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 83

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Dutchess

Orange

Nassau

New York

Suffolk

Oneida

Monroe

Onondaga Erie

Tioga

FISCAL YEAR 2018 NEW YORK

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Suffolk

Onondaga

Monroe

Nassau

New York

Erie

Tioga

Oneida

Dutchess

Orange

(M = millions)

$1.1 B

$1.1 B

$1.1 B

$945.3 M

$636.3 M

$571.1 M

$358.2 M

$227.7 M

$220.0 M

$197.1 M

Jefferson

Orange

Oneida

Albany

Saratoga

Onondaga

Niagara

Nassau

Schenectady

Suffolk

$919.8 M

$403.4 M

$152.0 M

$148.5 M

$101.8 M

$101.0 M

$92.6 M

$91.4 M

$87.1 M

$77.8 M

Saratoga

Schenectady

Albany

Jefferson

Oneida

Niagara

Orange

Nassau

Suffolk

Onondaga
84 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

$567.0 M

$123.9 M

$91.4 M

$76.6 M

$72.5 M

$64.2 M

$63.7 M

$58.9 M

$58.3 M

H-Squared LLC

Sodexo

WorldWide Language Resources

Astronautics Corporation of America

United Technologies

LGS Innovations

Raytheon

US Foods Holding

LC Industries Inc.

General Dynamics $56.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NORTH CAROLINA

#15 #27 2.2% $1,050 #23 #4 #6

$10.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $4.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

142,943 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$6.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$6.9 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

142,943

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Cumberland 46,473 10,386 563 2,249 59,671

Onslow 39,419 3,738 113 543 43,813

Craven 6,405 4,966 171 27 11,569

Wayne 4,502 747 230 1,599 7,078

Wake 593 689 1,368 2,171 4,821

Mecklenburg 178 442 1,503 954 3,077

Guilford 43 130 474 766 1,413

New Hanover ND 310 178 332

Pitt 44 19 264 240 567

Caldwell 329 25 139 ND ND

Construction: 10% Research and 

Development: 3%

Service: 49%

Supplies and

Equipment: 38%

Active Duty: 69%

Civilian: 16%

National 

Guard: 8%

Reserve: 7%

34%

26%

3%

37%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

50%

40%

8%

2%

$3.6 $3.9

$2.9 $2.8 $2.6 $2.5

$3.8 $4.0

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 85

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Guilford Durham

Wake

McDowell

Wayne

Mecklenburg

Hoke Cumberland

Craven

Onslow

NORTH CAROLINA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Cumberland

Onslow

Hoke

Craven

Guilford

Wake

Wayne

Durham

Mecklenburg

McDowell

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.2 B

$739.7 M

$568.1 M

$196.0 M

$173.5 M

$155.4 M

$105.9 M

$89.1 M

$77.1 M

$68.3 M

Cumberland

Onslow

Craven

Wayne

Wake

Mecklenburg

New Hanover

Guilford

Durham

Brunswick

$3.8 B

$1.6 B

$567.8 M

$326.0 M

$177.7 M

$90.8 M

$35.6 M

$31.9 M

$20.4 M

$17.2 M

Guilford Durham

Mecklenburg

New Hanover

Brunswick

Wake

Wayne

Cumberland

Onslow

Craven
86 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

General Atomic Technologies $12.7 M

Summit Technical Solutions $12.2 M

Dakco Distributors $9.4 M

Pro-Mark Services $9.4 M

Sygnos Inc. $7.2 M

United Crane & Excavation $7.0 M

Earthmovers Inc. $5.6 M

Johnson Controls $5.2 M

US Foods Holding $4.4 M

Mowa-Barlovento JV-A $3.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

NORTH DAKOTA

#45 #31 0.2% $1,028 #49 #39 #39

$0.8 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.4% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

13,489 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$626.8 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

13,489

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Ward 5,668 683 289 20 6,660

Grand Forks 1,629 363 301 39 2,332

Cass 29 295 1,550 205 2,079

Burleigh ND 268 927 52

Ramsey ND 51 325 ND

Richland ND ND 146 52

Barnes ND 19 94 ND

Stutsman ND ND 91 ND

Stark ND ND 74 ND

LaMoure ND ND 61 ND

Construction: 11%

Research and

Development: 0%

Service: 70%

Supplies and

Equipment: 19%

Active Duty: 55%

Civilian: 13%

National 

Guard: 30%

Reserve: 3%

17%

2%

60%

21%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

27%

1%

72%

0%

$0.2

$0.4

$0.2

$0.3

$0.1

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 87

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Pembina

Ward Ramsey

Benson

Grand Forks

Burleigh Cass

LaMoure

Sioux Dickey

NORTH DAKOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Ward

Grand Forks

Pembina

Cass

Sioux

Burleigh

LaMoure

Ramsey

Benson

Dickey

(M = millions)

$73.7 M

$44.6 M

$17.8 M

$7.0 M

$3.5 M

$3.2 M

$2.2 M

$704.7 K

$571.1 K

$523.3 K

Ward

Grand Forks

Cass

Burleigh

Ramsey

McLean

Barnes

Pembina

Richland

Stutsman

$367.5 M

$120.6 M

$63.5 M

$46.4 M

$10.8 M

$5.3 M

$3.2 M

$2.2 M

$2.1 M

$1.3 M

Ward Ramsey

McLean

Stutsman Barnes Cass

Richland

Pembina

Grand Forks

Burleigh
88 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

General Electric $1.1 B

CFM International $410.6 M

Battelle Memorial Institute $192.0 M

L3 Technologies $189.0 M

Wornick $162.6 M

Continental AG $122.3 M

Boeing $109.0 M

University of Dayton $106.5 M

United Technologies $102.7 M

Alion Science and Technology $96.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

OHIO

#19 #32 1.9% $819 #18 #11 #12

$9.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.4% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $6.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

61,278 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.2 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.2 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

61,278

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Greene 5,344 13,849 104 2,548 21,845

Franklin 432 7,106 3,683 2,910 14,131

Cuyahoga 203 2,803 429 219 3,654

Hamilton 131 270 733 984 2,118

Trumbull 35 61 379 1,524 1,999

Clark ND 392 1,565 ND

Richland ND 309 1,532 74

Stark 38 20 997 847 1,902

Summit ND 158 506 835

Fulton ND ND 1,047 ND

Construction: 1% Research and

Development: 15%

Service: 29%

Supplies and

Equipment: 54%

Active Duty: 11%

Civilian: 43%

National 

Guard: 27%

Reserve: 18%

13%

15%

47%

25%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

32%

5%

48%

16%

$5.0 $5.5

$4.3

$5.0

$3.7 $4.4 $5.0

$6.4

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 89

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Cuyahoga

Summit

Licking

Miami

Franklin

Montgomery

Butler

Clermont

FISCAL YEAR 2018 OHIO

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Greene

Hamilton

Montgomery

Butler

Franklin

Cuyahoga

Summit

Clermont

Licking

Miami

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.8 B

$1.4 B

$718.1 M

$514.3 M

$510.2 M

$257.8 M

$197.1 M

$153.5 M

$136.8 M

$90.9 M

Greene

Franklin

Cuyahoga

Hamilton

Clark

Richland

Trumbull

Lucas

Summit

Fulton

$1.7 B

$714.5 M

$200.8 M

$62.3 M

$61.3 M

$43.1 M

$41.4 M

$35.1 M

$33.1 M

$28.2 M

Lucas

Fulton

Cuyahoga

Trumbull

Richland

Clark

Greene

Hamilton

Hamilton

Greene

Franklin

Summit
90 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Boeing $1.3 B

Patriot Team $212.1 M

L3 Technologies $145.8 M

Axletech International $140.1 M

IAP Worldwide Services $90.8 M

AECOM $80.2 M

NORDAM Group $74.9 M

Arctic Slope Regional Corp. $60.3 M

Afognak Native Corp. $50.5 M

Harper Construction Company $44.3 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

OKLAHOMA

#24 #13 1.3% $1,658 #25 #14 #13

$6.5 B SPENT 

IN STATE

3.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $3.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

59,380 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$3.0 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$3.0 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

59,380

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Oklahoma 6,041 17,768 2,041 2,150 28,000

Comanche 11,938 2,535 314 506 15,293

Tulsa 45 889 1,843 435 3,212

Jackson 1,335 1,202 85 72 2,694

Pittsburg ND 1,981 218 14

Garfield 1,271 327 169 99 1,866

Cleveland 38 149 1,031 68 1,286

Canadian ND 21 576 465

Wagoner 21 17 454 351 843

Muskogee ND 80 337 48

Service: 66%

Supplies and

Equipment: 31%

Construction: 2%

Research and

Development: 1%

Active Duty: 35%

Civilian: 42%

National 

Guard: 15%

Reserve: 8%

12%

12%

69%

7%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

44%

5%

48%

3%

$2.3 $2.2

$1.6 $1.8

$2.4

$3.2

$3.9 $3.5

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 91

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Rogers

Garfield

Payne

Oklahoma

Cleveland Grady

OKLAHOMA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Oklahoma

Tulsa

Comanche

Cleveland

Garfield

Jackson

Payne

Rogers

Pittsburg

Grady

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.1 B

$576.0 M

$239.1 M

$183.6 M

$109.0 M

$81.2 M

$43.9 M

$37.0 M

$32.6 M

$12.9 M

Oklahoma

Comanche

Jackson

Pittsburg

Tulsa

Garfield

Cleveland

Canadian

Wagoner

Bryan

$1.7 B

$643.3 M

$148.8 M

$130.8 M

$113.0 M

$107.2 M

$31.3 M

$21.0 M

$17.7 M

$13.5 M

Garfield

Tulsa

Wagoner

Canadian

Pittsburg

Comanche Jackson

Bryan

Tulsa

Oklahoma

Cleveland

Pittsburg

Comanche Jackson
92 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Vigor Industrial $158.5 M

EPIC Aviation $95.8 M

FLIR Systems $80.7 M

Qorvo Inc. $47.7 M

Pacific Star Communications Inc. $31.3 M

Galois $24.0 M

Columbia Helicopters Inc. $22.8 M

Oregon Freeze Dry Inc. $16.3 M

Meggitt $14.4 M

Lacrosse Footwear Inc. $12.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

OREGON

#40 #50 0.3% $401 #39 #40 #42

$1.7 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.7% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $1.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,979 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$482.5 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,979

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Multnomah 236 1,544 2,052 698 4,530

Marion 16 301 1,381 ND

Klamath 116 325 992 ND

Clackamas 32 194 593 386 1,205

Lane 58 144 365 344 911

Umatilla ND 172 340 ND

Clatsop ND 57 286 ND

Jackson ND 41 288 ND

Washington ND 12 254 ND

Linn ND 37 202 ND

Construction: 1%

Research and 

Development: 5%

Service: 14%

Supplies and Equipment: 80%

Active Duty: 4%

Civilian: 24%

National Guard: 61%

Reserve: 11%

12%

56%

6%

25%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

66%

8%

25%

0%

$0.7

$0.9

$0.5 $0.5

$1.2

$0.6 $0.7

$1.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 93

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Washington

Multnomah

Hood River

Clackamas Yamhill

Marion

Linn

Lane Deschutes

Jackson

FISCAL YEAR 2018 OREGON

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = million) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Washington

Multnomah

Clackamas

Marion

Linn

Jackson

Yamhill

Lane

Hood River

Deschutes

(M = millions)

$544.9 M

$199.4 M

$185.7 M

$126.5 M

$19.0 M

$18.6 M

$18.2 M

$17.0 M

$14.9 M

$14.5 M

Multnomah

Marion

Klamath

Clackamas

Lane

Umatilla

Wasco

Sherman

Clatsop

Jackson

$211.3 M

$63.0 M

$55.4 M

$32.5 M

$26.8 M

$19.3 M

$12.9 M

$11.3 M

$8.3 M

$7.0 M

Clatsop

Umatilla

Sherman

Wasco

Clackamas

Lane

Jackson Klamath

Multnomah

Marion
94 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

AmerisourceBergen $2.3 B

BAE Systems $1.3 B

Bechtel Group $1.3 B

Fluor Corp. $1.2 B

Boeing $847.0 M

Highmark Inc. $387.6 M

Leonardo SpA $252.7 M

Maritime Helicopter Support Company $239.3 M

Pennsylvania State University $214.7 M

Lockheed Martin $175.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

PENNSYLVANIA

#7 #25 3.2% $1,259 #8 #16 #15

$16.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.0% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $13.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

57,035 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.7 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

57,035

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Philadelphia 402 8,058 1,362 103 9,925

Allegheny 319 1,359 1,491 2,867 6,036

Cumberland 661 3,884 236 213 4,994

Lebanon ND 956 3,783 185

York 285 3,353 73 439 4,150

Monroe 28 2,983 116 90 3,217

Dauphin 50 374 2,099 354 2,877

Montgomery ND 358 1,626 683

Franklin ND 2,088 151 382

Cambria 18 203 781 484 1,486

Construction: 1%

Research and 

Development: 6%

Service: 18%

Supplies and

Equipment: 75%

Active Duty: 4%

Civilian: 44%

National 

Guard: 33%

Reserve: 19%

22%

42%

4%

32%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

56%

18%

12%

14%

$11.9 $11.8

$10.2 $10.2 $10.3 $10.1 $11.3

$13.4

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 95

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Cambria

Allegheny

Bucks

Montgomery

Chester

York

Delaware

PENNSYLVANIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Allegheny

Chester

York

Delaware

Bucks

Philadelphia

Montgomery

Cambria

Dauphin

Cumberland

(M = millions)

$3.0 B

$2.5 B

$1.5 B

$1.2 B

$823.8 M

$549.0 M

$496.6 M

$448.9 M

$445.4 M

$400.5 M

Philadelphia

Cumberland

York

Allegheny

Monroe

Lebanon

Franklin

Dauphin

Montgomery

Adams

$754.8 M

$392.8 M

$272.0 M

$229.8 M

$202.2 M

$168.2 M

$156.3 M

$101.9 M

$75.5 M

$37.4 M

Monroe

Dauphin

Lebanon

Cumberland

Franklin

York

Philadelphia

Adams

Allegheny

Cumberland

Dauphin

Philadelphia

Montgomery
96 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Raytheon $63.6 M

Systems Engineering Associates $56.6 M

BAE Systems $44.0 M

Northrop Grumman $36.1 M

McLaughlin Research Corp. $31.9 M

Mikel Inc. $26.1 M

L3 Technologies $24.6 M

Rite-Solutions $23.1 M

Hyman Brickle & Son Inc. $17.1 M

Asgard Partners & Co. LLC $15.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

RHODE ISLAND

#42 #21 0.3% $1,384 #41 #42 #35

$1.5 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.4% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

12,336 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.8 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$799.2 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

12,336

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Newport 2,507 4,469 98 953 8,027

Washington ND 264 1,268 40

Kent 28 69 988 ND

Providence 105 192 502 232 1,031

Bristol ND ND 180 ND

Construction: 1%

Research and 

Development: 11%

Service: 62%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 27%

Active Duty: 25%

Civilian: 41%

National 

Guard: 25%

Reserve:10%

4%

80%

6%

10%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

65%

11%

1%

$0.8

$0.6

$0.7

$0.6 $0.5

$0.7

$0.6

$0.7

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 97

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Washington

RHODE ISLAND FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Newport

Providence

Washington

Kent

Bristol

(M = millions)

$542.9 M

$54.9 M

$38.9 M

$24.0 M

$3.7 M

Newport

Washington

Providence

Kent

Bristol

$655.5 M

$55.5 M

$42.6 M

$33.1 M

$2.7 M

Providence

Bristol

Kent

Newport

Washington

Newport
98 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Lockheed Martin $551.3 M

Great Lakes Dredge and Dock $219.1 M

UNAKA Corp. $164.1 M

SAIC $98.1 M

FN America $91.9 M

Detyens Shipyards $85.9 M

KBR $84.5 M

Scientific Research Corp. $71.4 M

CACI $69.9 M

Cerberus Capital Management $68.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

SOUTH CAROLINA

#25 #18 1.3% $1,231 #24 #10 #17

$6.3 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.7% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $3.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

67,710 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$2.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.6 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

67,710

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Richland 11,734 3,427 3,150 2,019 20,330

Charleston 3,782 4,593 824 2,975 12,174

Beaufort 10,670 1,259 68 47 12,044

Sumter 5,409 733 142 148 6,432

Berkeley 5,868 340 141 ND

Greenville 55 231 662 941 1,889

Spartanburg ND 12 304 193

Orangeburg ND 20 144 294

York ND 17 268 167

Florence 33 ND 234 125

Construction: 12%

Research and

Development: 3%

Service: 45%

Supplies and

Equipment: 41%

Active Duty: 58%

Civilian: 16%

National 

Guard: 16%

Reserve: 10%

24%

35%

28%

13%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

43%

35%

20%

1%

$4.4

$3.5 $3.1

$2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.7

$3.7

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 99

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Greenville

Spartanburg

Laurens

Marion

Richland

Lexington Sumter

Berkeley

Charleston

Beaufort

SOUTH CAROLINA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Charleston

Greenville

Berkeley

Richland

Sumter

Beaufort

Marion

Laurens

Lexington

Spartanburg

(M = millions)

$1.3 B

$660.8 M

$402.6 M

$343.2 M

$341.5 M

$181.0 M

$164.1 M

$59.8 M

$57.3 M

$27.3 M

Charleston

Richland

Sumter

Berkeley

Beaufort

Greenville

Anderson

Pickens

Lexington

Spartanburg

$686.6 M

$661.7 M

$393.3 M

$328.0 M

$301.2 M

$43.9 M

$12.1 M

$10.6 M

$9.7 M

$8.4 M

Greenville

Spartanburg

Pickens

Anderson

Lexington Sumter

Berkeley

Charleston

Richland

Beaufort
100 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Sterling Computers $113.7 M

Rosenbauer Beteiligungsverwaltung $58.3 M

Black Hills Ammunition Inc. $12.6 M

Forest Products Distributors $9.4 M

IHK JV $6.5 M

Pro-Mark Services $4.8 M

National Presto Industries $4.5 M

BH Services Inc. $3.8 M

Herman Construction Group Inc. $3.5 M

VRC Metal Systems $2.8 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

SOUTH DAKOTA

#47 #35 0.1% $713 #46 #47 #45

$0.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.3 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

9,542 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$365.3 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

9,542

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Meade 3,318 12 114 18 3,462

Minnehaha 18 358 1,538 308 2,222

Pennington ND 818 777 ND

Codington ND ND 327 ND

Brown ND ND 149 102

Hughes ND 56 137 ND

Davison ND 49 108 ND

Charles Mix ND 49 100 ND

Brookings ND 14 120 ND

Beadle ND ND 121 ND

Service: 21%

Supplies and

Equipment: 75%

Construction: 2%

Research and

Development: 2%

Active Duty: 36%

Civilian: 15%

National 

Guard: 45%

Reserve: 4%

6%

13%

48%

33%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

43%

1%

55%

0%

$0.4 $0.4

$0.2

$0.3

$0.1

$0.2

$0.2

$0.3

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 101

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Codington

Meade

Deuel

Brookings

Pennington

Minnehaha

Oglala Lakota

Yankton Union

SOUTH DAKOTA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Union

Minnehaha

Meade

Pennington

Deuel

Oglala Lakota

Lincoln

Yankton

Codington

Brookings

(M = millions)

$114.5 M

$63.8 M

$44.7 M

$28.8 M

$4.5 M

$2.1 M

$1.7 M

$1.3 M

$550.6 K

$317.3 K

Meade

Pennington

Minnehaha

Hughes

Codington

Charles Mix

Brookings

Davison

Lincoln

Buffalo

$183.1 M

$74.6 M

$60.4 M

$7.2 M

$4.9 M

$4.2 M

$3.7 M

$3.6 M

$3.3 M

$3.3 M

Codington

Meade Hughes

Pennington

Buffalo

Davison

Charles Mix

Lincoln

Brookings

Minnehaha

Lincoln
102 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

FedEx $450.9 M

BAE Systems $394.7 M

Bechtel Group $196.8 M

Chemring Group $56.2 M

ECI Defense Group $48.0 M

Healtheon Inc. $41.9 M

AECOM $38.7 M

L3 Technologies $34.5 M

Valley Apparel $28.1 M

APTIM Federal Services $26.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

TENNESSEE

#35 #47 0.6% $439 #34 #28 #33

$3.0 B SPENT 

IN STATE

0.8% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $2.0 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

26,245 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.0 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.0 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

26,245

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Shelby 1,271 2,373 1,311 1,429 6,384

Davidson 374 1,120 2,344 1,466 5,304

Blount 21 86 1,602 ND

Knox 78 404 364 809 1,655

Rutherford 30 116 957 432 1,535

Hamilton 50 76 399 747 1,272

Montgomery 41 1,084 48 ND

Coffee 50 378 235 ND

Gibson ND 38 418 ND

Washington 41 35 63 291 430

Construction: 16%

Research and

Development: 2%

Service: 53%

Supplies and

Equipment: 29%

Active Duty: 8%

Civilian: 24%

National Guard: 48%

Reserve: 21%

30%

12%

39%

19%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

62%

18%

18%

2%

$2.5

$1.5 $1.4 $1.3 $1.3

$2.0

$1.7

$2.0

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 103

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Hawkins Sullivan

Davidson

Anderson

Knox

Hickman

Coffee

Shelby Hardeman

FISCAL YEAR 2018 TENNESSEE

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Shelby

Coffee

Sullivan

Davidson

Knox

Montgomery

Hawkins

Hardeman

Hickman

Anderson

(M = millions)

$634.0 M

$379.4 M

$336.7 M

$90.6 M

$77.0 M

$73.1 M

$59.8 M

$56.3 M

$51.3 M

$26.5 M

Shelby

Davidson

Montgomery

Knox

Blount

Coffee

Rutherford

Hamilton

Gibson

Madison

$354.6 M

$208.7 M

$71.2 M

$54.4 M

$47.2 M

$39.0 M

$33.2 M

$26.9 M

$12.4 M

$9.4 M

Montgomery

Gibson

Rutherford

Madison Blount

Coffee

Shelby Hamilton

Montgomery

Davidson

Knox
104 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $19.4 B

Bell Boeing Joint Project Office $2.1 B

L3 Technologies $2.1 B

Raytheon $1.5 B

Textron $956.1 M

Royal Dutch Shell $936.2 M

Cerberus Capital Management $695.6 M

Andeavor $523.9 M

Valero Energy $494.0 M

Airbus $363.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

TEXAS

#3 #17 10.2% $1,770 #2 #3 #3

$50.8 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.8% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $39.9 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

218,993 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$10.9 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$10.9 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

218,993

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Bexar 35,972 22,248 3,253 8,934 70,407

Bell 32,206 5,405 453 808 38,872

El Paso 25,785 4,061 1,149 1,828 32,823

Tarrant 1,153 2,549 1,635 6,173 11,510

Harris 663 702 2,878 3,864 8,107

Wichita 5,969 1,095 196 134 7,394

Dallas 480 881 1,708 4,025 7,094

Nueces 1,486 3,706 181 473 5,846

Taylor 4,383 501 161 346 5,391

Travis 209 656 2,678 1,016 4,559

Service: 22%

Supplies and

Equipment: 73%

Construction: 2%

Research and

Development: 3%

Active Duty: 54%

Civilian: 22%

National

Guard: 10%

Reserve: 15%

22%

42%

19%

17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

60%

8%

29%

2%

$29.4 $31.5 $33.4

$23.8

$29.0 $26.9

$40.9 $39.9

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 105

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Potter

Hunt Collin

Tarrant

El Paso

Bell

Travis

Harris Bexar

FISCAL YEAR 2018 TEXAS

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Tarrant

Dallas

Bexar

Harris

Potter

Collin

Hunt

El Paso

Travis

Bell

(M = millions, B = billions)

$17.8 B

$6.0 B

$3.7 B

$3.0 B

$2.0 B

$1.6 B

$1.5 B

$1.0 B

$410.1 M

$400.3 M

Bexar

Bell

El Paso

Tarrant

Nueces

Taylor

Wichita

Dallas

Harris

Travis

$3.9 B

$2.1 B

$1.7 B

$431.6 M

$386.1 M

$284.5 M

$247.3 M

$244.2 M

$240.7 M

$177.7 M

Wichita

Dallas

Taylor

El Paso

Bell

Travis

Harris

Bexar

Nueces

Tarrant

Dallas
106 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

L3 Technologies $707.6 M

Northrop Grumman $304.3 M

Boeing $174.4 M

Utah State University $88.4 M

Albany International Corp. $69.0 M

Sinclair Companies $40.5 M

Moog $31.8 M

Berkshire Hathaway $31.6 M

HHI Corporation $28.1 M

Jacobs Engineering Group $27.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

UTAH

#29 #24 0.8% $1,284 #31 #25 #24

$4.1 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $2.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

31,554 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$1.7 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$1.7 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

31,554

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Davis 3,937 12,805 ND 1,397

Salt Lake 228 1,180 4,498 2,777 8,683

Tooele 28 1,082 161 ND

Utah 23 30 960 162 1,175

Weber 40 98 303 501 942

Washington ND 18 296 56

Cache ND ND 90 119

Sanpete ND ND 150 ND

Iron ND ND 105 ND

Carbon ND ND 102 ND

Construction: 3% Research and

Development: 9%

Service: 46%

Supplies and

Equipment: 43%

Active Duty: 14%

Civilian: 48%

National 

Guard: 22%

Reserve: 16%

25%

27%

38%

10%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

34%

2%

60%

4%

$3.5

$2.7

$1.7 $1.6 $1.4 $1.4

$1.8

$2.4

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 107

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Cache

Box Elder Weber

Summit Davis

Tooele Salt Lake

Utah

Grand

Iron

FISCAL YEAR 2018 UTAH

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Salt Lake

Davis

Cache

Weber

Tooele

Utah

Box Elder

Summit

Iron

Grand

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.2 B

$736.9 M

$107.9 M

$90.5 M

$88.3 M

$66.2 M

$41.6 M

$9.5 M

$5.9 M

$1.3 M

Davis

Salt Lake

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Washington

Cache

Box Elder

Sanpete

Wasatch

$1.2 B

$307.9 M

$84.5 M

$33.5 M

$24.6 M

$7.3 M

$5.7 M

$4.4 M

$3.6 M

$2.6 M

Wasatch

Sanpete

Washington

Cache

Box Elder Weber

Davis

Tooele

Salt Lake

Utah
108 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

General Dynamics $241.4 M

United Technologies $123.8 M

Benaka Inc. $43.0 M

Omni Measurement Systems $17.2 M

New England Woodcraft $16.9 M

Thomas Instrument & Machine Co. $9.9 M

Stewart Construction Inc. $5.5 M

Concepts NREC $4.8 M

Revision Militaire Inc. $4.3 M

Vermont Aerospace Industries $2.9 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

VERMONT

#46 #28 0.1% $1,026 #44 #51 #51

$0.6 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

4,304 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.1 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$133.9 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

4,304

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Chittenden 89 576 2,137 ND

Washington 39 11 370 ND

Rutland ND ND 120 103

Franklin ND ND 175 ND

Windsor ND 17 85 65

Windham ND ND 83 ND

Caledonia ND ND 84 ND

Bennington ND ND 83 ND

Orange ND ND 73 ND

Lamoille ND ND 62 ND

Supplies and

Equipment: 86%

Construction: 9% Research and

Development: 1%

Service: 4%

Active Duty: 3%

Civilian: 15%

National Guard: 78%

Reserve: 4%

65%

19%

9%

8%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

67%

2%

31%

1%

$0.3

$0.3 $0.2 $0.2

$0.3

$0.4

$0.5 $0.5

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 109

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Lamoille Caledonia

Chittenden

Washington

Addison Orange

Windsor

Rutland

Bennington

Windham

FISCAL YEAR 2018 VERMONT

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Chittenden

Addison

Rutland

Windsor

Washington

Bennington

Caledonia

Windham

Orange

Lamoille

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$339.5 M

$125.3 M

$20.5 M

$7.9 M

$6.0 M

$3.4 M

$3.2 M

$1.3 M

$1.0 M

$412.3 K

Chittenden

Washington

Windsor

Rutland

Franklin

Windham

Caledonia

Bennington

Addison

Orange

$102.5 M

$11.7 M

$4.8 M

$4.1 M

$3.8 M

$1.3 M

$1.1 M

$1.1 M

$1.1 M

$893.8 K

Franklin

Caledonia

Chittenden

Washington

Addison Orange

Windsor

Rutland

Bennington

Windham
110 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Huntington Ingalls $2.2 B

Booz Allen Hamilton $1.9 B

Northrop Grumman $1.6 B

General Dynamics $1.3 B

CACI $1.2 B

Leidos $1.0 B

BAE Systems $762.8 M

Atlantic Diving Supply $703.2 M

Lockheed Martin $671.8 M

SAIC $562.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

VIRGINIA

#2 #1 11.2% $6,603 #3 #2 #1

$56.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

10.3% OF STATE 

GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $38.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

244,892 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$18.0 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$18.0 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

244,892

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Norfolk 16,184 16,317 291 2,177 34,969

Virginia Beach 16,594 3,565 798 4,445 25,402

Fairfax 6,901 12,080 576 2,886 22,443

Arlington 2,736 15,913 80 165 18,894

Portsmouth 3,674 14,139 124 70 18,007

Prince William 7,822 4,323 281 798 13,224

Prince George 9,063 3,603 ND 452

Newport News 5,751 3,655 ND 1,076

York 7,758 631 979 920 10,288

Accomack 6,792 87 74 717 7,670

Construction: 2% Research and

Development: 10%

Service: 62%

Supplies and

Equipment: 26%

Active Duty: 50%

Civilian: 39%

National Guard: 3%

Reserve: 7%

24%

36%

14%

25%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

58%

9%

10%

$40.1 $38.2

$33.8 $35.9

$29.8 $30.7 $33.3

$38.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 111

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Loudoun

Fairfax

Prince William

Arlington

Alexandria

Newport News

Norfolk

Virginia Beach

Chesapeake

Portsmouth

FISCAL YEAR 2018 VIRGINIA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Fairfax

Arlington

Norfolk

Newport News

Prince William

Loudoun

Virginia Beach

Alexandria

Portsmouth

Chesapeake

(M = millions, B = billions)

$16.6 B

$3.4 B

$3.1 B

$2.7 B

$1.9 B

$1.7 B

$1.6 B

$1.3 B

$882.2 M

$526.0 M

Norfolk

Fairfax

Arlington

Virginia Beach

Portsmouth

Accomack

Prince William

Newport News

Prince George

York

$2.7 B

$2.2 B

$2.0 B

$1.5 B

$1.3 B

$962.5 M

$799.5 M

$649.1 M

$647.2 M

$598.8 M

Arlington

Accomack

Prince George

Fairfax

Prince William

Newport News

Norfolk

Virginia Beach

Portsmouth

York
112 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Boeing $6.9 B

PacMed $151.0 M

BP $110.4 M

USORC $108.7 M

International Marine and Industrial Applicators $100.8 M

Raytheon $97.1 M

Vigor Industrial $95.2 M

Skookum Educational Programs $64.3 M

General Dynamics $56.2 M

Dakota Creek Industries Inc. $53.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

WASHINGTON

#6 #16 3.2% $2,145 #12 #7 #7

$16.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.8% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $9.7 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

108,280 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$6.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$6.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

108,280

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Pierce 28,976 7,530 2,877 5,646 45,029

Kitsap 4,650 18,981 110 787 24,528

Island 7,364 818 ND 670

Spokane 3,051 990 1,504 834 6,379

Snohomish 672 515 328 1,304 2,819

King 427 973 1,237 143 2,780

Walla Walla ND 1,436 48 ND

Yakima 115 252 456 292 1,115

Clark 45 59 126 562 792

Thurston 82 80 222 74 458

Service: 18%

Supplies and

Equipment: 78%

Construction: 3%

Research and

Development: 2%

Active Duty: 54%

Civilian: 30%

National 

Guard: 7%

Reserve: 10%

5%

44%

39%

12%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

43%

45%

11%

1%

$7.6 $8.4 $7.8

$6.2 $6.1

$9.4 $8.7 $9.7

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 113

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Whatcom

Skagit

Island Snohomish

Kitsap

King

Pierce

Clark Klickitat

WASHINGTON FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

King

Kitsap

Pierce

Klickitat

Snohomish

Island

Whatcom

Spokane

Skagit

Clark

(M = millions, B = billions)

$7.2 B

$773.6 M

$547.8 M

$395.0 M

$223.9 M

$123.5 M

$123.3 M

$105.6 M

$74.9 M

$73.1 M

Pierce

Kitsap

Island

Spokane

King

Snohomish

Walla Walla

Yakima

Thurston

Clark

$2.6 B

$1.8 B

$540.3 M

$286.8 M

$147.2 M

$129.6 M

$54.5 M

$34.5 M

$21.8 M

$19.1 M

Spokane

Thurston

Yakima

Walla Walla

Island Snohomish

Kitsap

King

Pierce

Spokane

Clark
114 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

Northrop Grumman $243.9 M

Boeing $33.0 M

Leidos $21.8 M

Aero International $21.3 M

4D Tech Solutions Inc. $5.7 M

Rockwell Collins $4.5 M

Electronic Warfare Associates $4.3 M

United Technologies $4.2 M

Parsons Corp. $4.2 M

Cooper Materials Handling Inc. $4.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

WEST VIRGINIA

#44 #44 0.2% $438 #45 #45 #48

$0.8 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.0% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

10,370 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$328.0 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

10,370

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Kanawha 16 437 1,589 424 2,466

Berkeley ND 297 1,185 33

Wood ND 62 333 197

Putnam ND 123 451 17

Preston ND 63 385 67

Ohio ND 73 104 317

Cabell 25 450 ND ND

Wayne ND 34 316 91

Fayette ND 13 377 ND

Monongalia 16 11 125 153 305

Service: 22%

Supplies and

Equipment: 75%

Construction: 1%

Research and

Development: 3%

Active Duty: 1%

Civilian: 18%

National Guard: 61%

Reserve: 20%

46%

33%

7%

14%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

72%

2%

26%

0%

$0.2 $0.3

$0.2 $0.2 $0.2 $0.2

$0.4

$0.5

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 115

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Ohio

Monongalia

Mineral

Marion Berkeley

Harrison Jefferson

Wood

Greenbrier

WEST VIRGINIA FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Mineral

Harrison

Marion

Jefferson

Greenbrier

Kanawha

Wood

Monongalia

Berkeley

Ohio

(M = millions)

$266.3 M

$38.3 M

$30.0 M

$21.3 M

$20.2 M

$17.1 M

$14.0 M

$10.2 M

$9.1 M

$5.9 M

Kanawha

Berkeley

Cabell

Putnam

Preston

Wood

Wayne

Ohio

Monongalia

Harrison

$96.8 M

$47.8 M

$38.1 M

$17.6 M

$16.1 M

$13.7 M

$11.0 M

$10.2 M

$9.7 M

$8.6 M

Preston

Putnam

Cabell

Wayne

Wood

Monongalia Berkeley

Harrison

Ohio

Kanawha

Kanawha
116 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Oshkosh Corp. $1.6 B

Fincantieri Marine Systems $391.6 M

UnitedHealth Group $156.1 M

National Presto Industries $139.5 M

Enpro Industries Inc. $76.8 M

Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance $73.0 M

General Electric $66.1 M

Snap-On $49.8 M

Leonardo SpA $41.3 M

STATZ Corp. $32.7 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

WISCONSIN

#30 #41 0.8% $671 #26 #36 #41

$3.9 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.1% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $3.4 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

17,853 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$521.6 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

17,853

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Dane 123 564 2,307 668 3,662

Milwaukee 185 412 1,503 1,436 3,536

Monroe 252 1,123 289 618 2,282

Juneau ND 190 661 ND

Brown 16 29 131 532 708

Waukesha ND 18 468 187

Marathon ND 18 167 242

Outagamie 35 13 149 144 341

Fond du Lac ND ND 216 96

Winnebago ND 39 159 96

Service: 11%

Supplies and

Equipment: 86%

Construction: 2%

Research and

Development: 1%

Active Duty: 4%

Civilian: 16%

National Guard: 53%

Reserve: 27%

53%

26%

3%

19%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

76%

6%

17%

1%

$5.9

$2.5 $2.5

$1.5

$2.2

$3.1 $2.6

$3.4

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 117

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Monroe

La Crosse

Marinette

Brown

Winnebago

Dane

Waukesha

Milwaukee

Rock

Kenosha

WISCONSIN FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Winnebago

Marinette

Rock

Milwaukee

La Crosse

Waukesha

Dane

Monroe

Kenosha

Brown

(M = millions)

$1.6 B

$394.1 M

$277.5 M

$195.9 M

$177.0 M

$172.9 M

$143.2 M

$129.6 M

$80.7 M

$44.2 M

Dane

Monroe

Milwaukee

Juneau

Brown

Waukesha

Outagamie

Washington

Buffalo

Marathon

$126.2 M

$119.4 M

$110.6 M

$26.9 M

$13.6 M

$11.3 M

$8.1 M

$7.7 M

$7.7 M

$7.4 M

Buffalo

Juneau

Monroe

Marathon

Outagamie

Washington

Dane

Waukesha

Brown

Milwaukee
118 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions) 

United Excel $42.5 M

M1 Support Services $23.4 M

Ageiss Inc. $17.1 M

J.E. Hurley Construction $6.4 M

Kennon Products $4.0 M

Bairco Construction Inc. $3.8 M

Mirador-Nasco JV $3.0 M

Chugach Alaska Corp. $2.2 M

RBT Electric Inc. $2.1 M

Olgoonik Diversified Services $2.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (by fiscal year, billions)

WYOMING

#51 #37 0.1% $818 #50 #49 #49

$0.5 B SPENT 

IN STATE

1.2% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.2 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

7,264 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$0.3 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$318.2 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

7,264

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Laramie 3,125 1,072 1,750 110 6,057

Platte 57 57 168 ND

Natrona ND ND 122 57

Albany 11 ND 105 ND

Uinta ND ND 99 ND

Campbell ND ND 77 ND

Sweetwater ND ND 67 ND

Fremont ND ND 63 ND

Sheridan ND ND 54 ND

Goshen ND ND 58 ND

Service: 90%

Supplies and

Equipment: 7%

Construction: 1%

Research and

Development: 3%

Active Duty: 44%

Civilian: 16%

National 

Guard: 38%

Reserve: 2%

6%

3%

57%

34%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

26%

1%

73%

1%

$0.1

$0.2

$0.1 $0.1

$0.1

$0.1

$0.1

$0.2

FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 119

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

(M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

Park Big Horn

Sheridan

Teton

Fremont Natrona

Sublette

Albany Platte

Laramie

FISCAL YEAR 2018 WYOMING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2018

Laramie

Teton

Albany

Sheridan

Platte

Sublette

Park

Fremont

Big Horn

Natrona

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$132.8 M

$5.5 M

$5.2 M

$4.1 M

$2.6 M

$2.2 M

$1.1 M

$510.5 K

$290.8 K

$76.1 K

Laramie

Platte

Albany

Natrona

Uinta

Sheridan

Fremont

Lincoln

Campbell

Goshen

$291.7 M

$10.2 M

$3.7 M

$3.6 M

$1.5 M

$1.2 M

$1.0 M

$912.7 K

$859.8 K

$815.5 K

Campbell

Lincoln

Goshen

Uinta

Sheridan

Fremont Natrona

Albany Platte

Laramie
120 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

APPENDIX 1: MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

ALABAMA

Anniston Army Depot Army Active Calhoun

Birmingham Airport AF Guard Jefferson

Fort Benning Army Active Russell

Fort McClellan ARNG Training Center Army Guard Calhoun

Fort Rucker Army Active Dale

Maxwell AFB AF Active Montgomery

Montgomery JFHQ AFRC / CSMS 01 Army Guard Montgomery

Montgomery Regional Airport ANGB AF Guard Montgomery

Redstone Arsenal Army Active Madison

RW Shepherd Hope Hull Army Guard Montgomery

ALASKA

Alcantra Armory Complex Army Guard Matanuska-Susitna

Clear Air Force Station AF Active Denali

Eareckson AS AF Active Aleutians West

Eielson AFB AF Active Fairbanks North Star

Elmendorf AFB AF Active Anchorage

Fort Greely Army Active Southeast Fairbanks

Fort Richardson AF Active Anchorage

Fort Wainwright Army Active Fairbanks North Star

ARIZONA

Air Force Plant 44 AF Active Pima

Barry Goldwater Range MC Active Yuma

Buckeye TS Army Guard Maricopa

Camp Navajo Army Guard Coconino

Davis Monthan AFB AF Active Pima

Florence Military Reservation Army Guard Pinal

Fort Huachuca Army Active Cochise

Luke AFB AF Active Maricopa

MCAS Yuma MC Active Yuma

Papago Military Reservation Army Guard Maricopa

Picacho Aviation TS Army Guard Pinal

Silver Bell Army Heliport Army Guard Pinal

Sky Harbor IAP AF Guard Maricopa

The Barry M Goldwater Air Force Range AF Active Maricopa

Tucson IAP AF Guard Pima

Yuma Proving Ground Army Active La Paz

ARKANSAS

Camp Joseph T Robinson Army Guard Pulaski

Fort Chaffee MTC Army Guard Sebastian

Fort Smith MAP AF Guard Sebastian

Little Rock AFB AF Active Pulaski

Pine Bluff Arsenal Army Active Jefferson

CALIFORNIA

Air Force Plant 42 AF Active Los Angeles

Beale AFB AF Active Yuba

Joint

Site Service County Base Site

Joint

Service County Base

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 121

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

Joint

Site Service County Base

Joint

Site Service County Base

Channel Islands ANG Station AF Guard Ventura

Edwards AFB AF Active Kern

Fort Hunter Liggett Army Reserve Monterey

Fresno Yosemite International ANG AF Guard Fresno

ITC Camp San Luis Obisbo Army Guard San Luis Obispo

Los Angeles AFB AF Active Los Angeles

March ARB AF Reserve Riverside

MCAS Miramar MC Active San Diego

MCB Camp Pendleton MC Active San Diego

MCLB Barstow MC Active San Bernardino

MCRD San Diego MC Active San Diego

Military Ocean Terminal Concord Army Active Contra Costa

MTC-H Camp Roberts Army Guard San Luis Obispo

NAF El Centro Navy Active Imperial

NAS Lemoore CA Navy Active Kings

NAVBASE Coronado Navy Active San Diego

NAVBASE Point Loma Navy Active San Diego

NAVBASE San Diego CA Navy Active San Diego

NAVBASE Ventura Cty Point Mugu CA Navy Active Ventura

NAVSUPPACT Monterey CA Navy Active Monterey

NAVWPNSTA Seal Beach Navy Active Orange

NAWS China Lake Navy Active Inyo

Norwalk 2 AF Reserve Los Angeles

NTC and Fort Irwin Army Active San Bernardino

Port Hueneme Navy Active Ventura

Presidio of Monterey Army Active Monterey

Sierra Army Depot Army Active Lassen

Travis AFB AF Active Solano

TS AFRC Los Alamitos Army Guard Orange

Twentynine Palms MC Active San Bernardino

Vandenberg Main Base AF Active Santa Barbara

COLORADO

Buckley AFB AF Active Arapahoe

Cheyenne Mountain AFS AF Active El Paso

Fort Carson Army Active El Paso

Peterson AFB AF Active El Paso

Pueblo Chemical Depot Army Active Pueblo

Schriever AFB AF Active El Paso

USAF Academy AF Active El Paso

CONNECTICUT

Bradley IAP AF Guard Hartford

Camp Hartell Army Guard Hartford

Camp Niantic Army Guard New London

NAVSUBASE New London CT Navy Active New London

Stones Ranch Military Res Army Guard New London

DELAWARE

Bethany Beach TS Army Guard Sussex

Dover AFB AF Active Kent

New Castle Airport AF Guard New Castle

River Road Training Site Army Guard New Castle

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

JBAB Anacostia Bolling Navy Active District of Columbia

NSA Washington Navy Active District of Columbia

FLORIDA

Eglin AFB AF Active Okaloosa

Homestead ARB AF Reserve Miami-Dade

Hurlburt Field AF Active Okaloosa

Jacksonville IAP AF Guard Duval

MacDill AFB AF Active Hillsborough

MCSF Blount Island (FL) MC Active Duval

NAS Jacksonville FL Navy Active Duval

NAS Key West FL Navy Active Monroe

NAS Pensacola FL Navy Active Escambia

NAS Whiting Field Milton FL Navy Active Santa Rosa

NAVSTA Mayport FL Navy Active Duval

NSA Orlando Navy Active Orange

NSA Panama City Navy Active Bay

Patrick AFB AF Active Brevard

Tyndall AFB AF Active Bay

GEORGIA

Air Force Plant 6 AF Active Cobb

Atlanta - Confederate Ave Army Guard Fulton

Cumming Army Guard Forsyth

Dobbins ARB AF Reserve Cobb

Fort Benning GA Army Active Chattahoochee

Fort Gordon Army Active Richmond

Fort Stewart Army Active Liberty

General Lucius D Clay National Guard Center Army Guard Cobb

Macon Readiness Center Army Guard Bibb

MCLB Albany MC Active Dougherty

Moody AFB AF Active Lowndes

NAVSUBASE Kings Bay Navy Active Camden

Oglethorpe Armory Army Guard Clayton

Robins AFB AF Active Houston

Savannah/Hilton Head IAP AF Guard Chatham

VTS Catoosa Army Guard Catoosa

HAWAII

CNIC PMRF Barking Sands HI Navy Active Kauai

Fort Shafter Army Active Honolulu

Ft Ruger Army Guard Honolulu

JBPHH Pearl Harbor HI Navy Active Honolulu

Kalaeloa Army Guard Honolulu

MCB Hawaii (Kaneohe Bay) MC Active Honolulu

Schofield Barracks Military Reservation Army Active Honolulu

TS Keaukaha Mil Res Army Guard Hawaii

IDAHO

Bayview Idaho Navy Active Kootenai

Boise Air Terminal AF Guard Ada

Mountain Home AFB AF Active Elmore

Orchard Combat Training Center Army Guard Ada
122 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

Orchard Mates Boise Army Guard Ada

ILLINOIS

Capital Airport AF Guard Sangamon

General Wayne A Downing Peoria IAP AF Guard Peoria

Joliet USARC/JTA Army Reserve Will

Marseilles (MTA Tng Area) Army Guard LaSalle

Naval Station Great Lakes IL Navy Active Lake

Rock Island Arsenal Army Active Rock Island

Scott AFB AF Active St. Clair

Sparta Armory Army Guard Randolph

Springfield (TS Cp Lincoln) Army Guard Sangamon

INDIANA

Camp Atterbury Army Guard Bartholomew

Grissom ARB AF Reserve Miami

Hulman Fld AF Guard Vigo

Indianapolis 38 ID Army Guard Marion

Knightstown Army Guard Rush

Muscatatuck Urban Training Center Army Guard Jennings

NSA Crane Navy Active Martin

Shelbyville Army Guard Shelby

IOWA

Camp Dodge Johnston TS Army Guard Polk

Des Moines IAP AF Guard Polk

Iowa AAP Army Active Des Moines

Sioux Gateway Airport (ANG) AF Guard Woodbury

KANSAS

Forbes Field ANG AF Guard Shawnee

Fort Leavenworth Army Active Leavenworth

Fort Riley Army Active Riley

JFHQ-Kansas Army Guard Shawnee

McConnell AFB AF Active Sedgwick

Salina KS Training Center Army Guard Saline

Smoky Hill ANG Range AF Guard Saline

KENTUCKY

Blue Grass Army Depot Army Active Madison

Fort Campbell KY Army Active Christian

Fort Knox Army Active Hardin

Frankfort Boone NG Center Army Guard Franklin

Louisville IAP-Standiford FL Site 1 AF Guard Jefferson

WH Ford Regional Tng Ctr Army Guard Muhlenberg

LOUISIANA

Barksdale AFB AF Active Bossier

Baton Rouge AFRC Army Guard East Baton Rouge

Beauregard Training Range Army Guard Rapides

Camp Beauregard Army Guard Rapides

Camp Minden Training Site Army Guard Webster

Camp Villere Army Guard St. Tammany

Carville Gillis Long Center Army Guard Iberville

Esler Field Army Guard Rapides

Fort Polk Army Active Vernon

Hammond Airport Army Guard Tangipahoa

Jackson Bks Army Guard Orleans

NAS JRB New Orleans LA Navy Active Plaquemines

NAS JRB New Orleans LA AF Guard Plaquemines

MAINE

Auburn Training Site Army Guard Androscoggin

Bangor IAP AF Guard Penobscot

Bangor Training Site Army Guard Penobscot

Bog Brook Training Site Army Guard Oxford

DFAS Annex AF Active Aroostook

Hollis Plains Training Site Army Guard York

NSY Portsmouth Navy Active York

MARYLAND

Aberdeen Proving Ground Army Active Harford

Fort Detrick Army Active Frederick

Fort George G Meade Army Active Anne Arundel

Havre De Grace Military Res Army Guard Harford

JB Andrews AF Active Prince George's

Martin State Airport AF Guard Baltimore

MTA Camp Fretterd Army Guard Baltimore

MTA Gunpowder Military Reservation Army Guard Baltimore

Naval Air Station Patuxent River Navy Active St. Mary's

NAVSUPPACT Annapolis Navy Active Anne Arundel

NAVSUPPACT Bethesda MD Navy Active Montgomery

US Army Adelphi Laboratory Center Army Active Montgomery

MASSACHUSETTS

Ayer Army Guard Middlesex

Barnes Map (ANG) AF Guard Hampden

Cape Cod Air Station AF Active Barnstable

Devens Reserve Forces Tng Area Army Reserve Worcester

Hanscom AFB AF Active Middlesex

MTA Camp Curtis Guil Army Guard Essex

MTA Camp Edwards Army Guard Barnstable

Otis ANG Base AF Guard Barnstable

US Army Soldier Systems Center Natick Army Active Middlesex

Westover ARB AF Reserve Hampden

MICHIGAN

Alpena County Regional Airport AF Guard Alpena

CTC Fort Custer Trng Center Army Guard Kalamazoo

Detroit Arsenal Army Active Macomb

Lansing Joint Forces Readiness Center Army Guard Ingham

MTC-H Camp Grayling Army Guard Crawford

Selfridge ANGB AF Guard Macomb

US Army Garrison Selfridge Army Active Macomb

W K Kellogg AF Guard Calhoun

MINNESOTA

Camp Ripley Army Guard Morrison

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

Joint

Site Service County Base

Joint

Site Service County Base
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 123

Duluth IAP AF Guard St. Louis

Minn-St Paul AF Reserve Hennepin

MISSISSIPPI

CBC Gulfport MS Navy Active Harrison

Columbus AFB AF Active Lowndes

CTA Camp McCain Army Guard Grenada

Gulfport AVCRAD Army Guard Harrison

Gulfport-Biloxi Regional Airport (ANG) AF Guard Harrison

Jackson IAP Thompson Field AF Guard Rankin

Keesler AFB AF Active Harrison

MTA Camp Shelby Army Guard Perry

NAS Meridian MS Navy Active Lauderdale

OLF Bravo Navy Active Kemper

Woolmarket (De Soto) Navy Active Harrison

MISSOURI

Fort Leonard Wood Army Active Pulaski

Lake City AAP Army Active Jackson

Macon TS Army Guard Macon

MTA Camp Clark Nevada Army Guard Vernon

MTA Camp Crowder Neosho Army Guard Newton

NGA Arnold Site AF Active Jefferson

Rosecrans MAP (139AG) AF Guard Buchanan

Springfield AVCRAD (New) Army Guard Greene

St Louis Air Force Station AF Active St. Louis City

TS Clark Natl Forest Wappapello Army Guard Butler

TS Ike Skelton Jefferson City Army Guard Cole

Whiteman AFB AF Active Johnson

MONTANA

Great Falls IAP AF Guard Cascade

Helena Aviation RC- AASF- C12 Army Guard Lewis and Clark

Malmstrom AFB AF Active Cascade

MTA Ft Wm Henry Harrison Army Guard Lewis and Clark

MTA Limestone Hills Army Guard Broadwater

NEBRASKA

Camp Ashland Army Guard Sarpy

Grand Island AASF/RC Army Guard Hall

Greenlief TS/UTES 01 Army Guard Clay

Lincoln AASF/Readiness Center Army Guard Lancaster

Lincoln MAP AF Guard Lancaster

Mead TS/FMS 06/Utes 02 Army Guard Saunders

Offut AFB AF Active Sarpy

NEVADA

Anthony Cometa Complex Army Guard Clark

Creech AFB AF Active Clark

Floyd Edsall Training Center Army Guard Clark

Hawthorne Army Depot Army Active Mineral

NAS Fallon NV Navy Active Churchill

Nellis AFB AF Active Clark

Nellis Air Force Range AF Active Nye

Reno Tahoe IAP AF Guard Washoe

NEW HAMPSHIRE

New Boston Air Station AF Active Hillsborough

Newington Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Rockingham

NG New Hampshire Training Site Army Guard Strafford

Pease ANGB AF Guard Rockingham

NEW JERSEY

Atlantic City IAP AF Guard Atlantic

Dix AF Active Burlington

Lakehurst AF Active Ocean

Lawrenceville Army Guard Mercer

McGuire AF Active Burlington

Naval Weapons Station Earle NJ Navy Active Monmouth

Picatinny Arsenal Army Active Morris

Sea Girt NJ NGTC Army Guard Monmouth

USAF Expeditionary Center AF Active Burlington

NEW MEXICO

Cannon AFB AF Active Curry

Cannon AFB Site 2 AF Active Curry

Holloman AFB AF Active Otero

Kirtland AF Active Bernalillo

Las Cruces Army Guard Dona Ana

Melrose Air Force Range AF Active Roosevelt

Rio Rancho TS Army Guard Sandoval

Santa Fe - Onate Complex TS Army Guard Santa Fe

White Sands Missile Range NM Army Active Socorro

NEW YORK

Brooklyn NY MC Reserve Kings

Camp Smith Tng Site Army Guard Westchester

Fort Drum Army Active Jefferson

Fort Hamilton Army Active Kings

Francis S Gabreski Airport AF Guard Suffolk

Hancock Field AF Guard Onondaga

Niagara Falls AF Reserve Niagara

NSA Saratoga Springs NY Navy Active Saratoga

Rome Laboratory AF Active Oneida

Schenectady ANG MAP AF Guard Schenectady

Stewart Annex Army Active Orange

Stewart IAP AF Guard Orange

Syracuse MCRC MC Reserve Onondaga

Verona Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Oneida

Watervliet Arsenal Army Active Albany

West Point Military Reservation Army Active Orange

Youngstown Tng Site Army Guard Niagara

NORTH CAROLINA

ALF Bogue MC Active Carteret

Camp Mackall Army Active Scotland

Charlotte/Douglas IAP AF Guard Mecklenburg

Dare County Range AF Active Dare

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

Joint

Site Service County Base

Joint

Site Service County Base
124 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

Fort Bragg Army Active Cumberland

MCAS Cherry Point MC Active Craven

MCB Camp Lejeune (East Site) MC Active Onslow

MCB Camp Lejeune (West Site) MC Active Onslow

Military Ocean Tml Sunny Point Army Active Brunswick

MTA Camp Butner Army Guard Granville

Oak Grove MC Active Jones

OLF Atlantic MC Active Carteret

Raleigh Army Guard Wake

Seymour Johnson AFB AF Active Wayne

NORTH DAKOTA

Bismarck RJB Complex Army Guard Burleigh

Camp Grafton Army Guard Ramsey

Cavalier AS AF Active Pembina

Grand Forks AFB AF Active Grand Forks

Grand Forks Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Grand Forks

Hector IAP AF Guard Cass

Minot AFB AF Active Ward

OHIO

Beightler Armory Army Guard Franklin

Bratenahl Navy Active Cuyahoga

Camp Perry Joint Training Center Army Guard Ottawa

Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center Army Guard Portage

Camp Sherman Joint Training Center Army Guard Ross

Defense Supply Center Columbus Army Active Franklin

McConnelsville Training Site Army Guard Morgan

Rickenbacker AF Guard Franklin

Rickenbacker (MTA) Army Guard Franklin

Springfield Beckley AF Guard Clark

Toledo/Exp Airport AF Guard Lucas

US Army Joint Sys Mfg Ctr Lima Army Active Allen

Wright-Patterson AFB AF Active Greene

Youngstown AF Reserve Trumbull

OKLAHOMA

Altus AFB AF Active Jackson

Camp Gruber Army Guard Muskogee

Fort Sill Army Active Comanche

Kegelman Air Force Auxiliary Field AF Active Alfalfa

Lexington AASF No 1 Army Guard Cleveland

McAlester AAP Army Active Pittsburg

Muskogee AFRC Army Guard Muskogee

Norman CSMS Army Guard Cleveland

Oklahoma Military Department Army Guard Oklahoma

Tinker Aerospace Complex AF Active Oklahoma

Tinker AFB AF Active Oklahoma

Tinker Support Annex AF Active Oklahoma

Tulsa IAP AF Guard Tulsa

Vance AFB AF Active Garfield

Will Rogers World Airport AF Guard Oklahoma

OREGON

Biak Training Center COUTES Army Guard Deschutes

Camp Adair Corvallis Army Guard Benton

Camp Withycombe Clackamas Army Guard Clackamas

Lane County AFRC FMS 5 Army Guard Lane

McNary Field Salem AASF Army Guard Marion

MTA Camp Rilea Army Guard Clatsop

NAVWPNSYSTRAFAC Boardman Navy Active Morrow

Portland IAP ANG AF Guard Multnomah

PENNSYLVANIA

Cambridge Springs Army Guard Crawford

Carlisle Barracks Army Active Cumberland

Collegeville FMS 4 Army Guard Montgomery

Defense Distrib Depot Susq Army Active York

Det Phil Pny Annex Navy Active Philadelphia

Det Philadelphia PA Navy Active Philadelphia

Fort Indiantown Gap Army Guard Lebanon

Hollidaysburg Readiness Center Army Guard Blair

Letterkenny Army Depot Army Active Franklin

NAVSUPPACT Mechanicsburg PA Navy Active Cumberland

New Castle Readiness Center/FMS 9 Army Guard Lawrence

Pittsburgh IAP (ANG) AF Guard Allegheny

Pittsburgh IAP (ARS) AF Reserve Allegheny

Scranton AAP Army Active Lackawanna

Spring City Readiness Center Army Guard Chester

Tobyhanna Army Depot Army Active Monroe

RHODE ISLAND

Camp Fogarty Tng Site Army Guard Kent

Fort Adams RI Navy Active Newport

Gould Island RI Navy Active Newport

Naval Station Newport RI Navy Active Newport

Quonset State Airport AF Guard Washington

SOUTH CAROLINA

Charleston AFB AF Active Charleston

Charleston Defense Fuel Support Point AF Active Berkeley

Fort Jackson Army Active Richland

Joint Base Charleston Naval Weapons Station AF Active Berkeley

Joint Base Charleston North Yard AF Active Charleston

MCAS Beaufort MC Active Beaufort

McEntire Joint National Guard Base AF Guard Richland

MCRD Beaufort MC Active Beaufort

MTA Clarks Hill Reservation Army Guard McCormick

NAVSUPPFAC Beaufort SC Navy Active Beaufort

North Air Force Auxiliary Field AF Active Orangeburg

Poinsett Electronic Combat Range AF Active Sumter

Shaw AFB AF Active Sumter

SOUTH DAKOTA

Camp Rapid Army Guard Pennington

Ellsworth AFB AF Active Meade

Ellsworth AFB Site 2 AF Active Pennington

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

Joint

Site Service County Base

Joint

Site Service County Base
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 125

Joe Foss Field AF Guard Minnehaha

Mitchell Complex Army Guard Davison

Sioux Falls Benson Rd Complex Army Guard Minnehaha

West Camp Army Guard Pennington

TENNESSEE

Arnold AF Active Coffee

Fort Campbell TN Army Active Montgomery

Holston AAP Army Active Hawkins

Jackson Airport Armory Army Guard Madison

Johnson City Gray Army Guard Washington

McGhee Tyson Airport AF Guard Blount

Memphis IAP AF Guard Shelby

Milan AAP Army Active Gibson

Nashville Army Guard Davidson

Nashville IAP AF Guard Davidson

NAVSUPPACT Midsouth Memphis TN Navy Active Shelby

Northside Mid-South Navy Active Shelby

NSWC Carderock Div Navy Active Shelby

VTS Milan Army Guard Carroll

VTS Smyrna Army Guard Rutherford

TEXAS

Air Force Plant 4 AF Active Tarrant

ALF Cabaniss Navy Active Nueces

ALF Orange Navy Active Jim Wells

ALF Waldron Navy Active Nueces

Bergstrom - (Abia) Army Guard Travis

Brooks AFB AF Active Bexar

Camp Bullis Training Annex AF Active Bexar

Camp Mabry Army Guard Travis

Camp Maxey Army Guard Lamar

Camp Swift Army Guard Bastrop

Dixie Target Range Navy Active McMullen

Dyess AFB AF Active Taylor

Ellington Field AF Guard Harris

Fort Bliss Army Active El Paso

Fort Hood Army Active Coryell

Fort Wolters Army Guard Parker

Fort Worth - Shoreview Army Guard Tarrant

Goodfellow AFB AF Active Tom Green

Grand Prairie Reserve Complex Army Reserve Dallas

JBSA Sam Houston AF Active Bexar

Kelly AFB AF Active Bexar

Lackland AFB AF Active Bexar

Laughlin AFB AF Active Val Verde

Martindale - AASF Army Guard Bexar

Medical Center Annex AF Active Bexar

NALF Goliad Navy Active Goliad

NAS Corpus Christi TX Navy Active Nueces

NAS Fort Worth JRB TX Navy Active Tarrant

NAS Kingsville TX Navy Active Kleberg

Randolph AFB AF Active Bexar

Red River Army Depot Army Active Bowie

Saginaw Army Guard Tarrant

Seguin Auxiliary Field AF Active Guadalupe

Sheppard AFB AF Active Wichita

Yankee Target Range Navy Active McMullen

UTAH

Dugway Proving Ground Army Active Tooele

Hill AFB AF Active Davis

MTA-L Camp Williams Army Guard Utah

NAVPMOSSP Magna Utah Navy Active Salt Lake

Saint George/FMS 5B Army Guard Washington

Salt Lake City IAP AF Guard Salt Lake

Tooele Army Depot Army Active Tooele

Utah Test and Training Range South UT AF Active Tooele

UTTR - North AF Active Box Elder

VERMONT

Burlington IAP AF Guard Chittenden

Ethan Allen AFB MTA Army Guard Chittenden

TS Camp Johnson Army Guard Chittenden

TS Ethan Allen Range Army Guard Chittenden

Westminster Training Site Army Guard Windham

VIRGINIA

AASF Byrd Field Army Guard Henrico

ALF Fentress Chesapke Navy Active Chesapeake City

Arlington National Cemetery Army Active Arlington

Arlington Service Ctr Navy Active Arlington

Camp Pendleton SMR Army Guard Virginia Beach City

Cheatham Annex Navy Active York

Craney Island Navy Active Portsmouth City

Def Gen Supply Center Army Active Chesterfield

Elizabeth Rvr Channel Navy Active Portsmouth City

Fire Fighters School Navy Active Norfolk City

Fort A P Hill Army Active Caroline

Fort Belvoir Army Active Fairfax

Fort Eustis AF Active Newport News City

Fort Lee Army Active Prince George

Fort Myer Army Active Arlington

Fort Pickett ARMTC Army Guard Nottoway

JEBLCFS East Navy Active Virginia Beach City

JEBLCFS Wallops Island VA Navy Active Accomack

JNTEXPBASE Little Creek FS VA Navy Active Virginia Beach City

Lafayette Rvr Complex Navy Active Norfolk City

Langley AFB AF Active Hampton City

Mark Center WHS Alexandria City

MCB Quantico MC Active Stafford

NAS Oceana VA Navy Active Virginia Beach City

Naval Weapons Station Yorktown Navy Active York

NAVMEDCEN Portsmouth VA Navy Active Portsmouth City

NAVSTA Norfolk VA Navy Active Norfolk City

NAVSUPPACT Hampton Roads VA Navy Active Norfolk City

NAVSUPPACT Norfolk NSY Navy Active Portsmouth City

NNSY South Gate Navy Active Portsmouth City

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

Joint

Site Service County Base

Joint

Site Service County Base
126 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

NNSY St Helena Navy Active Norfolk City

Northwest Chesapeake VA Navy Active Chesapeake City

NSA South Potomac Navy Active King George

Pentagon Building Site WHS Arlington

Pumpkin Neck Navy Active King George

Radford AAP Army Active Montgomery

Rivanna Station Army Active Albemarle

SDA Area Navy Active Norfolk City

St Juliens Creek East Navy Active Chesapeake City

Yorktown Fuel Depot Navy Active York

WASHINGTON

Bangor WA Navy Active Kitsap

Bremerton Army Guard Kitsap

Camp Murray Army Guard Pierce

CNI NAVMAG Indian Island Navy Active Jefferson

Cusick Survival Training Site AF Active Pend Oreille

Fairchild AFB AF Active Spokane

Fort Lewis Army Active Pierce

Grant Training Annex Army Active Grant

Jim Creek Navy Active Snohomish

Keyport NUWC Navy Active Kitsap

Manchester Navy Active Kitsap

Marysville WA Navy Active Snohomish

NAS Whidbey Island WA Navy Active Island

Naval Base Kitsap Bremerton WA Navy Active Kitsap

NAVSTA Everett WA Navy Active Snohomish

OLF Coupeville Navy Active Island

Sea Plane Base Navy Active Island

Shipyard Puget Sound Navy Active Kitsap

White Bluff AF Active Spokane

Yakima Training Center Army Active Yakima

WEST VIRGINIA

Allegany Ballistics Lab Navy Active Mineral

CTC Camp Dawson-Kingwood Army Guard Preston

Elkins AFRC Army Guard Randolph

EWVRA Shepherd Field AF Guard Berkeley

Jackson County AFRC Army Guard Jackson

Volkstone Army Guard Preston

Williamstown Army Guard Wood

Yeager Airport AF Guard Kanawha

WISCONSIN

Camp Williams Tomah MTA Army Guard Juneau

Fort McCoy Army Reserve Monroe

Gen Mitchell IAP AF Guard Milwaukee

Truax ANGB AF Guard Dane

Volk ANGB AF Guard Juneau

W Silver Spring Complex Army Reserve Milwaukee

WYOMING

Cheyenne Regional Airport AF Guard Laramie

F E Warren AFB AF Active Laramie

MTCH Camp Guernsey Army Guard Platte

Source: Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas (MIRTA) dataset Fiscal Year 2015, 

from authoritative sources provided to the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for 

Energy, Installations, and Environment by Component Installation Geospatial 

Information and Services Programs.

MILITARY INSTALLATIONS BY STATE AND COUNTY

Joint

Site Service County Base

Joint

Site Service County Base
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 127

APPENDIX 2: METHODOLOGY

A. Defense Contracts

This section refers to U.S. Department of Defense (DoD)

contract obligations during fiscal year (FY) 2018 (i.e.,

October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018). Gross pay,

which is discussed in section F, is the only other type of

defense spending included in this report.

This report analyzes contract obligations because contracts 

are the principal method through which the DoD and 

other federal agencies spend money. The phrase “contract 

spending” reflects federal agencies’ use of contracts with 

suppliers to purchase all products and services over a 

legally specified threshold, which increased to $5,000 on 

May 30, 2018 and to $10,000 on August 31, 2018 (federal 

agencies can use agency credit cards to buy products and 

services valued at less than those amounts).1 While the 

DoD and other federal agencies obligate funds through 

other means, those payments comprise a small percentage 

of the DoD’s total expenditures.2

Contract obligation amounts are calculated from data 

obtained through USAspending.gov, a publicly available 

database of unclassified federal spending information 

maintained by the U.S. Department of the Treasury. All of 

the nearly 20 million award transactions the researchers 

downloaded from USAspending.gov for this report listed 

the DoD as the “funding agency,” and most of those 

records (92 percent) also listed the DoD as the “contracting 

agency.”

3

 Contract spending amounts reflect obligations 

rather than actual expenditures because payment data is 

not available for all of FY 2018. Totals are comprised of:

• Prime awards that federal agencies provide to

private- and public-sector organizations and

individuals for products (e.g., clothing and ships)

and services (e.g., information technology and 

research and development), and

• Sub-awards that prime-award recipients provide

to subcontractors.4

Contract spending figures in this report have not been 

adjusted for inflation; they have been adjusted to reliably 

reflect the location in which the spending occurred.

Prime and Sub-Award Reporting

Steps were taken to ensure the prime and sub-award 

data were accurately reported. In cases where a prime 

contractor gave a subcontract to another vendor, the 

subcontract amount was subtracted from the prime 

contractor’s total, as well as the totals for the state 

and county in which the prime contractor was located. 

Moreover, the amount was added to the subcontractor’s 

total and the spending for the state and county in which 

the subcontractor was located.

Fiscal Years for Contract Spending

This report incorporates two different methods for 

assigning prime and sub-awards to a particular fiscal year. 

The researchers allocated spending associated with prime 

awards to the fiscal year in which the prime award was 

obligated, and allocated all subsequent additions and 

subtractions of funds to the fiscal year in which those 

funding changes occurred. For example, if a prime award 

of $100 was signed on March 1, 2016, then the $100 in 

funds was allocated to FY 2016. If the DoD added $50 to 

the contract on October 15, 2016, then such funds were 

assigned to FY 2017. If the DoD deducted $25 from the 

same prime award on April 30, 2018, then that deduction 

was allocated to FY 2018.

1

 Federal Acquisition Regulation; Inflation Adjustment of Acquisition-Related Thresholds, 80 Fed. Reg. 38,293 (July 2, 2015).

2 Source: Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, August 31, 2008, https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA002260-18-

DPC.pdf. In FY 2018, the DoD spent $1.5 billion in grants, $17.0 million in direct payments, $9.4 million in financial assistance, and nothing on loans--a total of $1.53 billion, 

approximately 0.3 percent of the department's total spending. These figures are based on data obtained from USAspending.gov.

3

In USAspending.gov prime award records, the contracting agency is listed in the “awarding_agency_name” field and the “funding_agency_name” field lists the funding 

agency. See U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, https://www.usaspending.gov/#/download_center/data_dictionary.

4

 In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation clause 52.204-10 (Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards), prime contractors awarded a 

federal contract or order are required to file a sub-award report by the end of the month following the month in which the prime contractor awards any subcontract greater 

than $30,000. (General Services Administration, “About FFATA,” accessed December 20, 2019, https://www.fsrs.gov/#a-faqs).

This section contains additional details on the processes applied to derive the statistics provided in the state profiles 

throughout this report, as well as information on the military installations depicted in the maps in those profiles.
128 Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018

Sub-award amounts were deducted from the fiscal year in 

which the associated prime award was made and added 

to the fiscal year during which the sub-award was made. 

Continuing with the previous example, if a prime award 

of $100 was signed in FY 2016 and the contractor issued 

a $25 sub-award in FY 2016, then the $25 was deducted 

from the prime contractor’s total and added to the 

subcontractor’s figures for FY 2016. In this case, FY 2016 

is the year during which both the prime and sub-awards 

were made. If the contractor issued a subsequent $25 subaward in FY 2017, then that $25 was deducted from 

FY 2016 and added to FY 2017. 

It also should be noted that many sub-award records had 

large, erroneous spending amounts that necessitated 

revision or removal from the dataset.

B. Defense Contracts, By Type

This measure represents the proportions of total prime

award spending in a state or the District of Columbia that

went to four product and service categories: construction;

research and development; services; and supplies and

equipment. The DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy

was used to categorize the spending on the products and

services identified by the product service code listed

in each prime award record. The federal government

uses these codes to identify the products or services that

comprise the majority of spending in a prime award 

contract. Sub-award records do not contain such a code 

or any other product or service identifier. Therefore, 

sub-award spending was categorized by the product 

service code of the prime award against which the subaward was made.

C. Defense Contracts, By Service

This statistic is the percentage of defense contract

spending in a state or the District of Columbia that was

funded by the Military Services or other DoD activities

in FY 2018. For prime awards, the “Funding Sub Agency

Code” was used to identify the specific agency that funded

an award. For sub-awards, the “Funding Sub Agency Code“

listed for the associated prime award identified the funding 

agency for the sub-award. All awards identifying the U.S. 

Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force were 

categorized as “Army,” “Navy/Marines,” and “Air Force,”

respectively. All other DoD activities, such as the Defense 

Health Agency and Defense Logistics Agency, are

categorized as “Other Defense.”

D. Top Defense Contractors

This list includes the private- and public-sector vendors

that were among the ten biggest recipients of DoD

spending in a state or the District of Columbia during FY

2018. The researchers used unique nine-digit codes called

DUNS numbers to identify both the prime and sub-award

contractors.5 If a parent company was listed in the contract

records, the researchers applied the corresponding DUNS

number. If no parent company number was recorded, the

researchers used the DUNS numbers for the individual

vendors or sub-awardees.

E. Contract Awards Performed, By Fiscal Year

These numbers represent the total defense contract

awards performed in a state or the District of Columbia for

each fiscal year since 2011. Calculated according to the

methodology described in section A, these figures include

both prime and sub-awards, and are often different from 

The FY 2018 report contains one significant change 

from prior reports. From FY 2013 until FY 2017, 

the Defense Spending by State report reflected the 

length of each prime contract in USAspending.gov. 

Such adjustments were not made for the figures 

in the FY 2018 report due to data quality concerns 

(e.g., some contracts appear to have activity 

long after the end of the period of performance). 

The analysis continues, however, to adjust the 

prime obligations to reflect the year and place of 

performance of sub-awards. 

 “DUNS“ stands for Data Universal Numbering System, which is proprietary to Dun & Bradstreet, a commercial data company. Dun & Bradstreet uses the system to 5

establish business credit files and the numbers correspond to each physical location of a business. The federal government requires all businesses to have a DUNS 

number in order to receive a federal contract or grant (Dun & Bradstreet, “About the D-U-N-S Number“, accessed April 18, 2018, https://fedgov.dnb.com/webform/

pages/dunsnumber.jsp).
Office of Economic Adjustment — Defense Spending by State, FY 2018 129

those listed in the FY 2016 and FY 2017 versions of this 

report. These differences reflect contract modifications 

(e.g., the addition/reduction of funds that occurred after 

the data were obtained for the prior reports), as well as 

differences in the methods used to assign prime and subawards to specific fiscal years.

F. Defense Personnel

This section refers to the total active duty, civilian, National

Guard, and Reserve personnel in a state or the District of

Columbia in FY 2018. Defense payroll figures are the total

gross pay received by those personnel throughout FY 2018,

while personnel counts reflect the levels on September 30,

2018. These data are from the DoD’s Defense Manpower

Data Center (DMDC). Readers are cautioned not to

compare personnel counts from the Defense Spending by

State FY 2016 report to the FY 2018 report. As was the

case in the FY 2017 report, this report reflects DMDC data

for all personnel corresponding to a single snapshot in time

(September 30, 2018) rather than over the course of the

fiscal year.

Readers may notice that states with a large Navy/Marine 

presence (e.g., California, Washington, Virginia, and 

South Carolina) appear to have significantly increased 

in personnel and payroll numbers between FY 2017 

and FY 2018. This is due to a change in how the DMDC 

counts people. Personnel who previously appeared to 

be assigned to Armed Forces Americas or Armed Forces 

Europe are reported in FY 2018 in their home-port state, 

but with an APO/FPO zip code of their current overseas 

location. Since these codes do not have counties, their 

county is unknown, but they are included in the state 

totals.

Readers should be aware that for some states, the 

DMDC-provided payroll data include dollar values, 

but do not specify the personnel type (i.e., active duty, 

civilian, National Guard, and Reserve). Consequently, the 

combined pay for active duty, civilian, National Guard, 

6 U.S. Department of Defense, “Release Notes: Military Installations, Ranges, and Training Areas (Point Locations and Boundaries),” version 3.0, May 5, 2017, 

https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/military-installations-ranges-and-training-areas.

and Reserve may appear to be less than the total payroll 

value in the summary table on page 8.

G. Military Installations

The installations depicted in the maps throughout this

report are drawn from the DoD’s “Military Installations,

Ranges, and Training Areas” (MIRTA) dataset. The “MIRTA”

dataset contains geospatial data (i.e., latitude and

longitude) on the point locations and boundaries of DoD

facilities listed in the department’s 2015 Base Structure

Report. The points represent the centers or near-centers of

DoD sites, and the boundaries comprise federally owned or

managed land. The point centers were used to infer the

relevant county name via the Federal Communications

Commission’s geolocation service, https://geo.fcc.gov/api/

census. The dataset is in a shapefile format, which

is common for geographic information systems, and

conforms to the World Geodetic System 1984, a frequently

used terrestrial reference system referred to as “WGS84.”

The data are in decimal degrees. Many facilities in the

“MIRTA” dataset include subordinate sites. For various

reasons, not all military installations are included.6

U.S. Department of Defense

Office of Economic Adjustment

2231 Crystal Drive, Suite 520, Arlington, VA 22202

703-697-2130 | www.oea.gov