39464 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2022 / Notices 

11This segment has been combined with the 

ACCESS Segment Specific Information (SSI) field 

which will display the month in which the notice 

of the order or suspended investigation was 

published in the Federal Register, also known as 

the anniversary month. For example, for an order 

under case number A–000–000 that was published 

in the Federal Register in January, the relevant 

segment and SSI combination will appear in 

ACCESS as ‘‘AISL-January Anniversary.’’ Note that 

there will be only one annual inquiry service list 

segment per case number, and the anniversary 

month will be pre-populated in ACCESS. 

12See Procedural Guidance, 86 FR 53206. 

13See Final Rule, 86 FR 52335. 14 Id. 

1See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments, and 

Rescission of Review, in Part; 2019–2020, 86 FR 

73252 (December 27, 2021) (Preliminary Results), 

and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review: Multilayered Wood 

Flooring from the People’s Republic of China; 

2019–2020,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

3See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Amended 

for an order submitted an entry of 

appearance to the annual inquiry 

service list segment for the order in 

ACCESS, and on November 4, 2021, 

Commerce finalized the initial annual 

inquiry service lists for each order and 

suspended investigation. Each annual 

inquiry service list has been saved as a 

public service list in ACCESS, under 

each case number, and under a specific 

segment type called ‘‘AISL-Annual 

Inquiry Service List.’’ 11

As mentioned in the Procedural 

Guidance, beginning in January 2022, 

Commerce will update these annual 

inquiry service lists on an annual basis 

when the Opportunity Notice for the 

anniversary month of the order or 

suspended investigation is published in 

the Federal Register.12 Accordingly, 

Commerce will update the annual 

inquiry service lists for the above-listed 

antidumping and countervailing duty 

proceedings. All interested parties 

wishing to appear on the updated 

annual inquiry service list must take 

one of the two following actions: (1) 

New interested parties who did not 

previously submit an entry of 

appearance must submit a new entry of 

appearance at this time; (2) Interested 

parties who were included in the 

preceding annual inquiry service list 

must submit an amended entry of 

appearance to be included in the next 

year’s annual inquiry service list. For 

these interested parties, Commerce will 

change the entry of appearance status 

from ‘‘Active’’ to ‘‘Needs Amendment’’ 

for the annual inquiry service lists 

corresponding to the above-listed 

proceedings. This will allow those 

interested parties to make any necessary 

amendments and resubmit their entries 

of appearance. If no amendments need 

to be made, the interested party should 

indicate in the area on the ACCESS form 

requesting an explanation for the 

amendment that it is resubmitting its 

entry of appearance for inclusion in the 

annual inquiry service list for the 

following year. As mentioned in the 

Final Rule,13 once the petitioners and 

foreign governments have submitted an 

entry of appearance for the first time, 

they will automatically be added to the 

updated annual inquiry service list each 

year. 

Interested parties have 30 days after 

the date of this notice to submit new or 

amended entries of appearance. 

Commerce will then finalize the annual 

inquiry service lists five business days 

thereafter. For ease of administration, 

please note that Commerce requests that 

law firms with more than one attorney 

representing interested parties in a 

proceeding designate a lead attorney to 

be included on the annual inquiry 

service list. 

Commerce may update an annual 

inquiry service list at any time as 

needed based on interested parties’ 

amendments to their entries of 

appearance to remove or otherwise 

modify their list of members and 

representatives, or to update contact 

information. Any changes or 

announcements pertaining to these 

procedures will be posted to the 

ACCESS website at https://

access.trade.gov. 

Special Instructions for Petitioners and 

Foreign Governments 

In the Final Rule, Commerce stated 

that, ‘‘after an initial request and 

placement on the annual inquiry service 

list, both petitioners and foreign 

governments will automatically be 

placed on the annual inquiry service list 

in the years that follow.’’ 14

Accordingly, as stated above and 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.225(n)(3), the 

petitioners and foreign governments 

will not need to resubmit their entries 

of appearance each year to continue to 

be included on the annual inquiry 

service list. However, the petitioners 

and foreign governments are responsible 

for making amendments to their entries 

of appearance during the annual update 

to the annual inquiry service list in 

accordance with the procedures 

described above. 

This notice is not required by statute 

but is published as a service to the 

international trading community. 

Dated: June 24, 2022. 

Scot Fullerton, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14126 Filed 6–30–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–970] 

Multilayered Wood Flooring From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments; 2019– 

2020 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo and Wood 

Industry Co., Ltd. (Senmao) has made 

sales of multilayered wood flooring 

(wood flooring) from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) at prices 

below normal value during the period of 

review (POR) December 1, 2019, 

through November 30, 2020. In 

addition, Commerce determines that 

certain companies had no shipments 

during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable July 1, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sergio Balbontin or Alexis Cherry, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230 telephone: (202) 482–6478 

and (202) 482–0607, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results of the administrative review on 

December 27, 2021.1 For the events that 

occurred since Commerce published the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.2 Commerce 

conducted this review in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 3

The product covered by the Order is 

wood flooring from China. A full 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2022 / Notices 39465 

Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less 

than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 76 

FR 76690 (December 8, 2011), as amended in 

Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s 

Republic of China: Amended Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 77 FR 5484 (February 

3, 2012) (collectively, Order); see also Multilayered 

Wood Flooring from the People’s Republic of China: 

Final Clarification of the Scope of the Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders, 82 FR 27799 (June 

19, 2017). 

4See Appendix I. 

5See Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

6See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 

76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment 

Notice); see also ‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, 

below. 

7See Appendix IV. 

8See Longkou Haimeng Mach. Co. v. United 

States, 581 F. Supp. 2d 1344, 1357–60 (CIT 2008) 

(affirming Commerce’s determination to assign a 

4.22 percent dumping margin to the separate-rate 

respondents in a segment where the three 

mandatory respondents received dumping margins 

of 4.22 percent, 0.03 percent, and zero percent, 

respectively); see also Certain Kitchen Appliance 

Shelving and Racks from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 74 FR 36656, 36660 (July 24, 2009). 

9See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 

1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). 

10See Preliminary Results PDM at 13–14; see also 

section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. 

11See Appendix III. 

12See Appendix IV. 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the parties’ case 

and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of these issues is attached to this 

notice.4 The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes from the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, Commerce made 

certain revisions to the calculation of 

the preliminary weighted-average 

dumping margin assigned to Senmao 

and the non-examined, separate rate 

respondents. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum contains descriptions of 

these revisions. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that certain companies did 

not have shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR. As we 

received no information to contradict 

our preliminary determination with 

respect to those companies, we continue 

to find that they made no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR. Additionally, we 

find that Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration 

Material Co., Ltd. had no shipments of 

subject merchandise during the POR.5

Accordingly, we will issue appropriate 

instructions that are consistent with our 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ clarification for 

all of the companies listed in Appendix 

II.6

Separate Rates 

Consistent with the Preliminary 

Results, we determine that Senmao and 

nine additional companies that were not 

selected for individual examination 

demonstrated their eligibility for 

separate rates.7

Rate for Non-Examined Separate Rate 

Respondents 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be assigned to 

respondents not selected for individual 

examination when we limit our 

examination of companies subject to the 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Act. 

Generally, we look to section 735(c)(5) 

of the Act, which provides instructions 

for calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for respondents not 

individually examined in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero and de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ Accordingly, 

Commerce’s normal practice in 

determining the rate for separate-rate 

respondents not selected for individual 

examination, has been to average the 

weighted-average dumping margins of 

the selected companies, excluding rates 

that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available.8 However, 

when the weighted-average dumping 

margins established for all individually 

investigated respondents are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act 

permits Commerce to ‘‘use any 

reasonable method to establish the 

estimated all-others rate for exporters 

and producers not individually 

investigated, including averaging the 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margins determined for the exporters 

and producers individually 

investigated.’’ 9

For the final results of this review, we 

determine the estimated weightedaverage dumping margin for Senmao to 

be above zero or de minimis. Thus, 

consistent with the Preliminary Results, 

we are assigning Senmao’s weightedaverage dumping margin as the rate for 

the non-examined respondents which 

qualify for a separate rate in this review 

as a ‘‘reasonable method’’ for assigning 

a rate to the non-examined 

respondents.10

The China-Wide Entity 

Aside from the companies for which 

we made a final no-shipment 

determination, Commerce considers all 

other companies for which a review was 

requested, and which did not 

demonstrate separate rate eligibility, to 

be part of the China-wide entity.11

Final Results of Administrative Review 

For the companies subject to this 

administrative review which established 

their eligibility for a separate rate, 

Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margins exist for the period December 1, 

2019, through November 30, 2020: 

Producer/exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Jiangsu Senmao Bamboo 

and Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd ..................................... 39.27 

Non-Selected Companies 

Under Review Receiving a 

Separate Rate 12 ............... 39.27 

Disclosure 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b), within 

five days of the publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register, we will 

disclose to the parties to this 

proceeding, the calculations that we 

performed for these final results of 

review. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with these final results of 

review. We intend to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of 

these final results. If a timely summons 

is filed at the U.S. Court of International 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
39466 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2022 / Notices 

13See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

14See Multilayered Wood Flooring from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Final Determination of No Shipments; 2016–2017, 

84 FR 38002, 38003 (August 5, 2019). 

15For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Assessment Notice. 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e., within 90 days of 

publication). 

For Senmao, whose weighted-average 

dumping margin is not zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in 

the final results of this review and 

because we do not have entered values 

for all U.S. sales to a particular importer 

(or customer), Commerce intends to 

calculate a per-unit assessment rate by 

dividing the total amount of dumping 

for reviewed sales of subject 

merchandise to that importer (or 

customer) by the total quantity sold to 

that importer (or customer). 

We intend to instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review when the 

importer-specific assessment rate 

calculated is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 

percent). To determine whether the duty 

assessment rates are de minimis, in 

accordance with the requirement set 

forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we 

calculate importer- (or customer-) 

specific ad valorem ratios based on the 

estimated entered value. Where an 

importer-specific per-unit assessment 

rate is zero or de minimis, Commerce 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.13

For U.S. entries that were not reported 

in the U.S. sales data submitted by 

Senmao, but that entered under 

Senmao’s case number (i.e., at Senmao’s 

cash deposit rate), Commerce will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the cash deposit rate for the China-wide 

entity (i.e., 85.13 percent).14 For the 

companies not individually examined 

in this administrative review that 

qualified for a separate rate, the 

assessment rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

calculated for Senmao in these final 

results of review. 

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice in non-market 

economy cases, for the companies 

which Commerce determined had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries made under 

those exporters’ case numbers (i.e., at 

the exporters’ rates) will be liquidated at 

the China-wide rate.15

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of these final results for 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for 

companies which were found eligible 

for a separate rate in this review, the 

cash deposit rate will be 37.29 percent; 

(2) for previously investigated or 

reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese 

exporters that received a separate rate in 

a prior segment of this proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all 

Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be that for the Chinawide entity; and (4) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the Chinese exporter that 

supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These cash deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during the POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Orders 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return or destruction of APO 

materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: June 24, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement & 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Final Determination of No Shipments 

V. Changes from the Preliminary Results 

VI. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether to Revise the 

Calculation of Plywood and HDF Input 

Costs 

Comment 2: Whether to Revise the 

Surrogate Value for Plywood 

Comment 3: Whether to Revise the 

Surrogate Financial Ratios 

Comment 4: Whether to Revise the 

Surrogate Value for Labor 

Comment 5: Whether to Value Logs Using 

Brazilian Surrogate Value Data 

Comment 6: Whether to Grant Senmao a 

By-Product Offset 

VII. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

No Shipments 

Anhui Longhua Bamboo Product Co., 

Ltd. 

Arte Mundi (Shanghai) Aesthetic Home 

Furnishings Co., Ltd. (successor-ininterest to Scholar Home (Shanghai) 

New Material Co., Ltd.) 23

Baroque Timber Industries (Zhongshan) 

Co., Ltd. 

Benxi Wood Company 

Dalian Deerfu Wooden Product Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Jaenmaken Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Dalian Jiahong Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Shengyu Science And 

Technology Development Co., Ltd. 

Dongtai Fuan Universal Dynamics, LLC 

Dunhua City Dexin Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Dunhua City Hongyuan Wood Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

Dunhua City Jisen Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Fine Furniture (Shanghai) Limited 

HaiLin LinJing Wooden Products Co., 

Ltd. 

Hunchun Xingjia Wooden Flooring Inc. 

Huzhou Chenghang Wood Co., Ltd 

Huzhou Fulinmen Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. 

Huzhou Sunergy World Trade Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Keri Wood Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Mingle Flooring Co., Ltd 

Jiangsu Simba Flooring Co., Ltd. 

Jiangsu Yuhui International Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

Jiashan HuiJiaLe Decoration Material 

Co., Ltd. 

Jiashan On-Line Lumber Co., Ltd. 

Jiaxing Hengtong Wood Co., Ltd. 

Jilin Xinyuan Wooden Industry Co., Ltd. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 126 / Friday, July 1, 2022 / Notices 39467 

Kember Flooring, Inc. (a.k.a. Kember 

Hardwood Flooring, Inc.) 

Linyi Anying Wood Co., Ltd. 

Linyi Youyou Wood Co., Ltd. 

Muchsee Wood (Chuzhou) Co., Ltd. 

Pinge Timber Manufacturing (Zhejiang) 

Co., Ltd. 

Power Dekor Group Co., Ltd. 

Sino-Maple (Jiangsu) Co., Ltd. 

Suzhou Dongda Wood Co., Ltd. 

Tongxiang Jisheng Import and Export 

Co., Ltd. 

Yekalon Industry Inc. 

Yihua Lifestyle Technology Co., Ltd. 

(successor-in-interest to Guangdong 

Yihua Timber Industry Co., Ltd.) 

Yingyi-Nature (Kunshan) Wood 

Industry Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Dadongwu Greenhome Wood 

Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Longsen Lumbering Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Shiyou Timber Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Shuimojiangnan New Material 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

Appendix III 

China-Wide Entity 

A&W (Shanghai) Woods Co., Ltd. 

Anhui Boya Bamboo & Wood Products 

Co., Ltd. 

Anhui Yaolong Bamboo & Wood 

Products Co. Ltd. 

Armstrong Wood Products (Kunshan) 

Co., Ltd. 

Armstrong World Industries Inc. 

Changzhou Hawd Flooring Co., Ltd. 

Chinafloors Timber (China) Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Dajen Wood Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Guhua Wooden Product Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Huade Wood Product Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Huilong Wooden Products Co., 

Ltd. 

Dalian Kemian Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Dalian Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., 

Ltd., Fusong Jinlong Wooden Group 

Co., Ltd., Fusong Jinqiu Wooden 

Product Co., Ltd., and Fusong 

Qianqiu Wooden Product Co., Ltd. 

(collectively, Fusong Jinlong Group) 

Dalian T-Boom Wood Products Co., Ltd. 

Guangzhou Homebon Timber 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

Guangzhou Panyu Kangda Board Co., 

Ltd. 

Guangzhou Panyu Southern Star Co., 

Ltd. 

Hangzhou Hanje Tec Company Limited 

Hangzhou Zhengtian Industrial Co., Ltd. 

Hunchun Forest Wolf Wooden Industry 

Co., Ltd. 

Huzhou Jesonwood Co., Ltd. 

Innomaster Home (Zhongshan) Co., Ltd. 

Jiafeng Wood (Suzhou) Co., Ltd. 

Jilin Forest Industry Jinqiao Flooring 

Group Co., Ltd. 

Karly Wood Product Limited 

Kemian Wood Industry (Kunshan) Co., 

Ltd. 

Linyi Bonn Flooring Manufacturing Co., 

Ltd. 

Mudanjiang Bosen Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Nakahiro Jyou Sei Furniture (Dalian) 

Co., Ltd. 

Omni Arbor Solution Co., Ltd. 

Power Dekor North America Inc. 

Shandong Longteng Wood Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai Lairunde Wood Co., Ltd. 

Shanghaifloor Timber (Shanghai) Co., 

Ltd. 

Shenyang Haobainian Wooden Co., Ltd. 

Shenzhenshi Huanwei Woods Co., Ltd. 

Xiamen Yung De Ornament Co., Ltd. 

Xuzhou Antop International Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

Xuzhou Shenghe Wood Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Biyork Wood Co., Ltd. 

Zhejiang Fudeli Timber Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Zhejiang Jiechen Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Zhejiang Simite Wooden Co., Ltd. 

Appendix IV 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

Receiving a Separate Rate 

Benxi Flooring Factory (General 

Partnership) 

Dalian Penghong Floor Products Co., 

Ltd./Dalian Shumaike Floor 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

Dun Hua Sen Tai Wood Co., Ltd. 

Dunhua Shengda Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd 

Jiangsu Guyu International Trading Co., 

Ltd 

Kingman Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

Lauzon Distinctive Hardwood Flooring, 

Inc. 

Metropolitan Hardwood Floors, Inc. 

Zhejiang Fuerjia Wooden Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–14124 Filed 6–30–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Environmental Technologies Trade 

Advisory Committee; Meeting 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of an open meeting of a 

Federal Advisory Committee. 

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the 

schedule and proposed topics for a 

meeting of the Environmental 

Technologies Trade Advisory 

Committee (ETTAC). 

DATES: The meeting is scheduled for 

Tuesday, July 26, 2022 from 10:00 a.m. 

to 1:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time 

(EDT). The deadline for members of the 

public to register to participate, 

including requests to make comments 

during the meeting and for auxiliary 

aids, or to submit written comments for 

dissemination prior to the meeting, is 

5:00 p.m. EDT on Tuesday, July 19, 

2022. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will take place 

in the Research Library at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230. Requests to register to 

participate in-person or virtually 

(including to speak or for auxiliary aids) 

and any written comments should be 

submitted via email to Ms. Victoria Yue, 

Office of Energy & Environmental 

Industries, International Trade 

Administration, at Victoria.yue@

trade.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Victoria Yue, Office of Energy & 

Environmental Industries, International 

Trade Administration (Phone: 202–482– 

3492; email: Victoria.yue@trade.gov). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

meeting will take place on Tuesday, July 

26, 2022 from 10:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. 

EDT. The general meeting is open to the 

public and time will be permitted for 

public comment. Members of the public 

seeking to attend the meeting are 

required to register in advance. Those 

interested in attending must provide 

notification by Tuesday, July 19, 2022, 

at 5:00 p.m. EDT, via the contact 

information provided above. This 

meeting is physically accessible to 

people with disabilities. Requests for 

sign language interpretation or other 

auxiliary aids should be directed to 

Victoria Yue at Victoria.Yue@trade.gov 

or (202) 482–3492 no less than one week 

prior to the meeting. Requests received 

after this date will be accepted, but it 

may not be possible to accommodate 

them. 

Written comments concerning ETTAC 

affairs are welcome any time before or 

after the meeting. To be considered 

during the meeting, written comments 

must be received by Tuesday, July 19, 

2022, at 5:00 p.m. EDT to ensure 

transmission to the members before the 

meeting. Minutes will be available 

within 90 days of this meeting. 

Topics to be considered: At this final 

meeting of the current ETTAC charter 

(2020–2022), the ETTAC will present its 

recommendations to senior officials 

from the U.S. Department of Commerce, 

then interagency representatives of the 

Trade Promotion Coordinating 

Committee’s Environmental Trade 

Working Group (TPCC ETWG) will 

respond to the recommendations that 

the ETTAC presented. The meeting will 

be co-chaired by senior officials from 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES