alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2016249DE.01005801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 16.9.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 249/58 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2016/1036 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 8. Juni 2016 über den Schutz gegen gedumpte Einfuhren aus nicht zur Europäischen Union gehörenden Ländern

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 176 vom 30. Juni 2016](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2016_176_R_TOC)
)

Seite 26, Artikel 2 Absatz 7a Fußnote 1

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(1) | Dazu gehören Albanien, Armenien, Aserbaidschan, Belarus, Kirgisistan, Moldawien, die Mongolei, Nordkorea, Tadschikistan, Turkmenistan und Usbekistan.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(1) | Dazu gehören Albanien, Armenien, Aserbaidschan, Belarus, Georgien, Kirgisistan, Moldau, die Mongolei, Nordkorea, Tadschikistan, Turkmenistan und Usbekistan.“. |

---
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference into the registration statement of BIO-key International, Inc., on Form S-8 (file no. 333-137414), of our report dated March 23, 2011 relating to the financial statements which appear in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

 
| /s/ / Rotenberg Meril Solomon   Bertiger & Guttilla, P.C. |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| ROTENBERG MERIL SOLOMON BERTIGER &   GUTTILLA, P.C.       |   |
| Saddle   Brook, New Jersey                                         |   |
| March 23,   2011                                              |   |

 

1

----
**Michigan Supreme Court** 

**Lansing, Michigan**

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 25, 2014 

# Order

March 25, 2014

146478 ( 134 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN

, Plaintiff

- Appell ee

,

v

RAYMOND CURTIS CARP

, Defendant

- Appell ant

. SC: 146478

COA: 307758

St. Clair CC: 06

- 001700

- FC

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant

- appellant for leave to file

supplemental authority and supporting brief is GRANTED. The supplemental authority

and brief submitted on March 24, 2014 is accepted for filing.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4994 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4994

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain inflatable mattresses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2008

  Mr. Berry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain inflatable mattresses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN INFLATABLE MATTRESSES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00      Pneumatic           Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         inflatable                                                         31/2011
                         mattresses not of
                         cotton (provided
                         for in subheading
                         6306.40.49)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 19-3120

___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Devonte Demario Colbert,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

 ____________

 Submitted: May 11, 2020

Filed: May 14, 2020

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, BEAM, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Devonte Demario Colbert appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1

after he pleaded guilty to a drug offense. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and

1The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Southern District of Iowa.
has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the

substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

Upon careful review under a deferential abuse-of-discretion standard, see Gall

v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 41 (2007), we conclude that the district court did not

impose an unreasonable sentence. The court properly considered the factors set forth

in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and there is no indication that the court overlooked a relevant

factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a

clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster,

572 F.3d 455, 461-62 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc). Finally, we have independently

reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no

nonfrivolous issues for appeal. 

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the

judgment. 

______________________________

-2-
EX-10.2





 Exhibit 10.2 
  

 
 



 
 August 7, 2019 

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL 

Jennifer Ryu     
 Dear Jenn: 

I am pleased to confirm your promotion to Interim Chief Financial Officer of Resources Global Professionals (“RGP” or the “Company”),
effective August 23, 2019. In this role, you will report to me as Chief Executive Officer. Below, enumerated are the enhanced terms and conditions of this promotion: 
  

	 	•	 	 Base Salary: This is an exempt position and will be compensated at an annual rate of $325,000, less
standard withholdings and authorized deductions, and payable in bi-weekly installments. 


  

	 	•	 	 Incentive Compensation: Beginning this fiscal year (i.e., Fiscal Year 2020), you will be eligible to
participate in the Executive Incentive Plan (“EIP”). Additional information regarding the EIP will be provided under separate cover. As such, you will no longer be eligible to participate in any other Company bonus program, including the
bonus described in your March 15, 2019 Offer Letter. 


 All other terms and conditions of employment, including the at-will nature of your employment, remain unchanged. 
 To confirm your acceptance of our offer and the terms of this
letter, please sign below in the space provided and return the original to us within seven (7) business days from the date of this letter. 
 Jenn, I
personally want to express to you our deep gratitude for your service to this Company over the last few months. I am enthusiastic about your continued employment as a member of the senior leadership group of RGP. 

Sincerely, 
  

	
	 /s/ Kate Duchene

	Kate Duchene
	Chief Executive Officer

 I hereby accept Resources Global Professionals’ offer as described in this letter. 

 

					
	/s/ Jennifer Ryu	 		 	8/7/2019
	Signature	 		 	Date

 Resources Global Professionals is an Equal Opportunity Employer. 

17101 Armstrong Avenue, Suite 100 Irvine, California 92614 USA 

Telephone +1 714 430 6400    www.rgp.com
STATE v. LAMM.

No. COA04-336.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Wake (98CRS3871)

Case reported without published opinion Remanded.
Exhibit 3.2





CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT


TO


CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


OF


TELANETIX, INC.







Telanetix, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "Corporation") does hereby certify that:




1.           The certificate of incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by deleting paragraph (a) of the Article Fourth thereof in its entirety and inserting the follow in lieu thereof:




"(a) The Corporation is authorized to issue a total of Three Hundred Ten Million (310,000,000) shares of stock.  Three Hundred Million (300,000,000) shares shall be designated "Common Stock" with a par value of $0.0001 per share and Ten Million (10,000,000) shares shall be designated "Preferred Stock" with a par value
of $0.0001 per share."




2.           The foregoing amendment to the certificate of incorporation of the Corporation has been duly adopted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Sections 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, by approval of the board of directors of the Corporation and
by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of the outstanding stock of the Corporation entitled to vote.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation to be signed by Douglas N. Johnson, its duly appointed chief executive officer, this 17th day of June, 2009.









TELANETIX, INC.









/s/ Douglass N. Johnson


Douglas N. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. PRINCE

No. COA04-1255

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Forsyth (02CRS60410, 03CRS105).

Case without published opinion. No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5027 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5027

To suspend temporarily the duty on integral flow controllers, certified 
  by the importer exclusively for installation in semiconductor wafer 
                         fabrication machines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2008

  Mr. Wexler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on integral flow controllers, certified 
  by the importer exclusively for installation in semiconductor wafer 
                         fabrication machines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INTEGRAL FLOW CONTROLLERS, CERTIFIED BY THE IMPORTER 
              EXCLUSIVELY FOR INSTALLATION IN SEMICONDUCTOR WAFER 
              FABRICATION MACHINES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00      Integral flow       Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         controllers,                                                       31/2011
                         certified by the
                         importer
                         exclusively for
                         installation in
                         semiconductor
                         wafer fabrication
                         machines
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         9032.89.60)......

    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--The amendment made by subsection (a) 
        applies to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
        consumption, on or after January 1, 2007.
            (2) Retroactive application.--Notwithstanding section 514 
        of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514) or any other 
        provision of law, upon proper request filed with U.S. Customs 
        and Border Protection before the 90th day after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act, any entry, or withdrawal from warehouse 
        for consumption, of an article--
                    (A) that was made on or after January 1, 2007, and 
                before the date of the enactment of this Act, and
                    (B) with respect to which there would have been no 
                duty if the amendment made by subsection (a) applied to 
                such entry or withdrawal,
        shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such amendment 
        applied to such entry or withdrawal.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATIONS

Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the report of NationsRent Companies, Inc. (NationsRent) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas J. Putman, the Chief
Executive Officer of NationsRent, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i)     
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)     
The information contained in such the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NationsRent.

Date: May 12, 2006

| | /s/ Thomas J. Putman
Thomas J. Putman
Chief Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Citigroup Fairfield Futures Fund L.P. II (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jerry Pascucci

|
|
|
|

Jerry Pascucci
Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
President and Director

Date:November 14, 2007

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Deirdra Dixson, Also Known as Deirdra Dixon, Appellant.

[799 NYS2d 915]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered July 15, 2003, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review her specific challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence *(see*CEL 470.05 [2]; *People v Bynum,*70 NY2d 858 [1987]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant’s identity and guilt of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Although the defendant contends that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence because of inconsistencies in the testimony of police officers, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CEL 470.15 [5]). H. Miller, J.P., Cozier, Ritter and Fisher, JJ., concur.
Tinya CHERNEY v. NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL PARK.

No. 606A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 5, 2005.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 166 N.C.App. 684, 603 S.E.2d 842 (2004), affirming a decision and order entered by the North Carolina Industrial Commission on 28 July 2003. Heard in the Supreme Court 19 April 2005.

Knott, Clark & Berger, L.L.P., by Michael W. Clark, Kenneth R. Murphy, III, and Joe Thomas Knott, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellant.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by William H. Borden, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.

Justice NEWBY did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
STATE v. CAMERON.

No. COA04-1199.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 21, 2005.

Certification Date July 11, 2005.

Appeal from the Harnett (02CRS7376, 02CRS7377, 02CRS7378, 02CRS7388, 02CRS7389, 02CRS7390, 02CRS55386, 03CRS5481, 03CRS5482, 02CRS7392, 02CRS7393, 02CRS7394, 02CRS7395, 02CRS7396).

Case without published opinion. No error.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

STX FINANCING, LLC, 

Appellant

v.

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of 

Commerce for Intellectual Property and 

Director of the United States Patent and 

Trademark Office, 

Intervenor

______________________

2022-1192

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No.

91240829.

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

April 15, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 15, 2022

Case: 22-1192 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 04/15/2022
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The followingcertification accompanies the issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A, for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2006, and is not filed, as provided in Release33-8212, 34-47551.

In connection withthe accompanying Quarterly Report of Treaty Oak Bancorp, Inc. (“Treaty Oak”)on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Jeffrey L. Nash, Chief Financial Officer of Treaty Oak, hereby certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Treaty Oak.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TreatyOak and will be retained by Treaty Oak and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| Dated:  August 17, 2006 |                    |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    |                    |
|                    |                    |
|                    | /s/ Sandra L. Ellsworth |   |
|                    | Sandra L. Ellsworth     |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Rule 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a)
CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund VII, LP;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Dean Cash

Dean L. CashPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofATEL Financial Services, LLC (General Partner)
 49
STATE v. Justin Everett ROSE.

No. 296P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 7, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of June 2005 by Sam Bridges to Withdraw as Counsel:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 7th day of June 2005."