alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016155EN.01000201.xml

| 14.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 155/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 155/2

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/924

of 1 June 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Allgäuer Sennalpkäse (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany's application to register the name ‘Allgäuer Sennalpkäse’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Germany's application to register the name ‘Allgäuer Sennalpkäse’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Allgäuer Sennalpkäse’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Allgäuer Sennalpkäse’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Allgäuer Sennalpkäse’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.3. Cheeses, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 June 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 20, 21.1.2016, p. 10.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hospira,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Christopher B.Begley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Christopher B. Begley |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher B. Begley           |
| Chief Executive Officer         |
| May 27, 2004                    |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Hospira, Inc. and will be retained by Hospira, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
Air Force

Army

Navy/Marines

Other Defense

60%

28%

1%

11%

$0.2

$0.1

$0.2

$0.1 $0.1 $0.1 $0.1 $0.1

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

28%

1%

71%

0%

Construcon: 21%

Research and

 Development: 2%

Service: 63%

Supplies and

 Equipment: 15%

Acve Duty: 44%

Civilian: 16%

Naonal Guard/

Reserve: 41%

M1 Support Services

Summit Construcon

AGEISS

Four Tribes Construcon Services

M2 Technology

Bristol General Contractors

RECCO

Olgoonik Diversified Services

Kennon Products

RMC Sound Earth

$18.1 M

$6.9 M

$4.7 M

$4.3 M

$3.8 M

$3.6 M

$3.2 M

$3.0 M

$2.7 M

$2.2 M

Laramie

Plae

Natrona

Albany

Goshen

Uinta

Sheridan

Fremont

Campbell

Sweetwater

County

5,966

306

176

128

83

81

79

78

69

62

Total*

3,080

53

ND

10

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Acve Duty

   Military

1,032

59

11

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Civilian

 FISCAL YEAR 2017

WYOMING

   DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Con ense Con ense Contractors (M=millions)

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)

   DEFENSE PERSONNEL

Allocaons, By Type

Allocaons, By Service

$307.3 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

$307.3 MILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

7,197

TOTAL PERSONNEL

7,197

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Loc sonnel Loc sonnel Locaons

*Total also includes unif al also includes uniformed Na ormed Naonal Guar onal Guard and R d and Reserve units. e units.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquision Policy; DoD’s Military Installaons, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis;

U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

116 Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017
AF Actve AF Guard Army Guard

WYOMING WYOMING

#51 #40 0.1% $686 #51 #49 #48

$0.4 B

SPENT IN STATE

1.0% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S.

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER RESIDENT $0.1 B CONTRACT

SPENDING

7,197 NUMBER

OF PERSONNEL

$0.3 B PERSONNEL

SPENDING

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K=thousands M=millions)

Laramie County

$82.3 M

Sheridan County

$2.7 M

Plate County

$2.5 M

Sublete County

$2.3 M

Teton County

$2.3 M

Natrona County

$794.4 K

Park County

$355.2 K

Fremont County

$350.5 K

Albany County

$346.4 K

Crook County

$83.4 K

Laramie

Sheridan

Plate

Sublete

Teton

Natrona

Park

Fremont

Albany

Crook

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (K=thousands M=millions)

Laramie County

$280.9 M

Plate County

$10.4 M

Albany County

$3.7 M

Natrona County

$3.0 M

Fremont County

$1.8 M

Sheridan County

$1.5 M

Uinta County

$1.4 M

Converse County

$796.2 K

Campbell County

$738.6 K

Lincoln County

$646.3 K

Laramie

Plate

Albany

Natrona Fremont

Sheridan

Uinta

Converse

Campbell

Lincoln

Oĸce of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2017 117
MYERS v. McGRADY and McGrady v. Forrest.

No. 391A04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 4, 2005.

Christopher G. Browning, Jr., Solicitor-General, Raleigh, Robert T. Hargett, Amar Majmundar, Special Deputy Attorney Generals, for N.C. Div. of Forrest Res., et al.

Donald R. Strickland, Jerome P. Trehy, Jr., Raleigh, Dirk J. Derrick, Conway, SC, for Gail M. Myers.

Steven M. Sartorio, Jamal A. Rhinehardt, Raleigh, for Shirley McGrady & Thomas Higgins.

Rodney E. Petty, for Michael P. Murphy.

F. Fincher Jarrell, Charlotte, for James Foust & William Spencer.

Douglas F. Debank, for Verian Ladson.

Charles L. Becton, Raleigh, for Interested Party.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th day of September 2005 by Plaintiff (Gail M. Myers) for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Gall M. Myers) shall have up to and including the 21st day of November 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court In conference this the 4th day of October 2005."
Exhibit 24.1

POWERS OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints C. Allen Bradley, Jr., Geoffrey R. Banta and Todd Walker, and each of them, the true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on
his behalf as a director or officer or both, as the case may be, of AMERISAFE, Inc. an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to sign any or all
amendments thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the
others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



|                          |  |  |  |                      
|------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------
|/s/ C. Allen Bradley, Jr. |  |  |  | /s/ Millard E. Morris
|C. Allen Bradley, Jr.     |  |  |  | Millard E. Morris    
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Geoffrey R. Banta     |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel Phillips  
|Geoffrey R. Banta         |  |  |  | Daniel Phillips      
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Thomas W. Hallagan    |  |  |  | /s/Randall Roach     
|Thomas W. Hallagan        |  |  |  | Randall Roach        
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Jared A. Morris       |  |  |  | /s/ Sean M. Traynor  
|Jared A. Morris           |  |  |  | Sean M. Traynor      
|                          |  | 
|/s/ Austin P. Young, III  |  |  |  |                      
|Austin P. Young, III      |  |  |  |                      



Dated: February 26, 2008
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn: Robert Castle / Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway, 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Wilmington, DE 19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Alvin Courts                   | Ally Bank |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 700               | Attn:  Martha Tate |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 200 West Civic Center Drive |
|                                            | Sandy, UT 84070 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2017-5 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of November 22, 2017 through December 31, 2017, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been made under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   |   |
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

Certification Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

*(as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)*

 

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Jostens Holding Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  November 15, 2004 | /s/    Marc L.  Reisch |
|------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                               | Marc L. Reisch                        |
|                               | ***President and***                   |
|                               | ***Chief Executive Officer***         |

 

 
| Date:  November 15, 2004 | /s/    Paul B.  Carousso |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                               | Paul B. Carousso                        |
|                               | *Vice President, Finance*               |
|                               | *(Chief Accounting Officer)*            |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to JostensHolding Corp. and will be retained by Jostens Holding Corp. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
86 Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016

 Data sources: DoD’s Defense Manpower Data Center; DoD’s Procurement and Acquisition Policy; DoD’s Military Installations, Ranges and Training Areas; USASpending.gov; U.S. Bureau of Economic 

Analysis; U.S. Census Bureau; and Unitedstateszipcodes.org.

OHIO

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

FISCAL YEAR 2016

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$2.6 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

61,431

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Total* Active Duty Civilians

Military

Greene 23,749 6,976 14,603

Franklin 13,488 592 7,867

Cuyahoga 3,898 242 2,921

Hamilton 2,075 110 326

Clark 1,841 ND 494

Stark 1,682 48 23

Richland 1,529 ND 400

Trumbull 1,516 41 72

Summit 1,336 ND 162

Lucas 1,024 48 448

*Total also includes uniformed National Guard and Reserve units.

National Guard/

Reserve: 39%

Active Duty: 14%

Civilian: 47%

32%

4%

48%

16%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

By Type

Service: 32%

Construction: 2%

Research and 

Development: 18%

Supplies and 

Equipment: 48%

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M=millions)

General Electric $810.9 M

Battelle Memorial Institute $180.3 M

Northrop Grumman $160.1 M

Boeing $119.1 M

Wornick $100.9 M

CFM International $89.9 M

General Dynamics $79.0 M

Lockheed Martin $77.9 M

Raytheon $73.9 M

L-3 Communications $69.4 M

$6.8

$6.2 $5.8

$4.9

$4.0 $3.9 $3.8

$6.0

13%

15%

48%

24%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, Billions)
Office of Economic Adjustment - Defense Spending by State, FY 2016 87

Montgomery

Cuyahoga

Hamilton

Richland 

Clark

Greene Franklin 

Trumbull 

Montgomery

Cuyahoga

Hamilton

Licking 

Butler

Clermont

Miami

Greene Franklin 

Summit

Greene County

$1.5 B

Franklin County

$580.1 M

Cuyahoga County 

$183.9 M

Hamilton County

$40.2 M

Clark County

$33.8 M

Richland County

$25.0 M

Lucas County

$24.3 M

Mahoning County

$24.1 M

Montgomery County

$23.0 M

Trumbull County

$15.7 M

(M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions B=billions) (M=millions)

Hamilton County

$958.4 M

Greene County

$843.9 M

Montgomery County

$482.4 M

Cuyahoga County

$222.1 M

Franklin County

$206.3 M

Summit County

$173.7 M

Butler County

$148.6 M

Licking County

$142.2 M

Clermont County

$79.0 M

Miami County

$62.6 M

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

#19

$6.4 B 

SPENT IN STATE

#39

1.0% OF STATE GDP

1.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

$547

PER RESIDENT

#19

$3.8 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

#17

61,431 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

#12

$2.6 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

FISCAL YEAR 2016 OHIO

Mahoning 

Lucas

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed March 

10, 2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-20-00126-CV

IN RE ISCO INDUSTRIES, INC., Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

125th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017-32226

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On February 5, 2020, relator Isco Industries, Inc. filed a petition for writ of 

mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (Supp.); see also Tex. 

R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Kyle 

Carter, presiding judge of the 125th District Court of Harris County, to vacate his 

January 6, 2020 order denying relator’s “Rule 12 Motion Requesting Attorneys’ for 

Plaintiffs and Intervenor To Show Authority to Prosecute their Claims.”
2

With certain exceptions not applicable here, to obtain mandamus relief, a 

relator must show both that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that the 

relator has no adequate remedy at law, such as an appeal. In re Garza, 544 S.W.3d 

836, 840 (Tex. 2018) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); In re Prudential Ins. Co. of 

Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). 

Because relator has not shown it is entitled to mandamus relief, we deny its 

petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Wise, and Zimmerer.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# AGENCY:

National Science Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of permit issued.

# SUMMARY:

The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. This is the required notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Andrew Titmus, ACA Permit Officer, Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-4479; email:                         *ACApermits@nsf.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On May 13, 2022, the National Science Foundation published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     of a permit application received. The permit was issued on June 16, 2022 to:                

1. Dr. Paul Ponganis, Permit No. 2023-002

Erika N. Davis,

Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.

[FR Doc. 2022-13460 Filed 6-23-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
STATE of North Carolina v. Chris MILLER.

No. 51P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2004.

Chris Miller, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Ronald L. Moore, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 3rd day of February 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Buncombe County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of March 2004."
EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of New York Health Care, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jacob Rosenberg, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)  the  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d),  as  applicable,  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934, and


      (2)  the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly presents, in all
      material  respects,  the  financial condition and results of operations of
      the  Company  at  the  dates  and  for  the  periods  indicated.


Date: March 31, 2004                 By: /s/ Jacob Rosenberg
                                     -----------------------
                                         Jacob Rosenberg
                                     Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
#### Scott Peterman et al., Respondents, v George Pataki, as Governor of the State of New York et al., Respondents. Oneida Indian Nation of New York et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[801 NYS2d 212]

Appeal from a judgment (denominated order) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (James W. McCarthy, A.J.), entered August 25, 2004. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of Oneida Indian Nation of New York and Ray Halbritter to dismiss the third amended complaint upon the grounds of failure to join an indispensable party and lack of a justiciable controversy.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Gorski, Smith and Lawton, JJ.
STATE v. TRUESDALE

No. COA04-1465

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS37610).

Case without published opinion. No error.