alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 24.1

POWERS OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of the
undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints C. Allen Bradley, Jr., Geoffrey R. Banta, G. Janelle Frost, James E. OBannon, and Todd Walker, and each of them, the true and lawful attorney or attorneys-in-fact, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him or her and in his or her name, place, and stead, to sign on his or her behalf as a director or officer or both, as the case may be, of AMERISAFE, Inc. an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2010 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and to sign any or all amendments thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully
to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



|                                               |  |                                             
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|                                               | 
|/s/C. Allen Bradley, Jr. C. Allen Bradley, Jr. |  | /s/Millard E. Morris Millard E. Morris      
|                                               | 
|/s/G. Janelle Frost G. Janelle Frost           |  | /s/Sean M. Traynor Sean M. Traynor          
|                                               | 
|/s/Philip A. Garcia Philip A. Garcia           |  | /s/Austin P. Young, III Austin P. Young, III
|                                               | 
|/s/Jared A. Morris Jared A. Morris             |  | /s/Randall Roach Randall Roach              
|                                               | 
|/s/Daniel Phillips Daniel Phillips             |  |                                             

Dated: March 1, 2011
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00419

- CR

B RANDON D ESHAWN H UMES

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1483296D)

February 14, 2019

Opinion by Justice Pittman

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment o f the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Mark T. Pittman

_________________ Justice Mark T. Pittman
Exhibit 32.1



QUADRAMED CORPORATION

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of QuadraMed Corporation for the period ended December 31, 2006, I, Keith B. Hagen, Chief Executive Officer of QuadraMed Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my best knowledge:



|1. | This Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of QuadraMed Corporation.
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 16, 2007 |  | /s/ Keith B. Hagen     
|                     |  | Keith B. Hagen         
|                     |  | Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

            Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

In connection with the Annual Report of Rofin-Sinar Technologies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
Wirth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company. .

Date:    December 13, 2004

                                               /s/  Peter Wirth
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                    Peter Wirth
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
STATE v. FLORA

No. COA05-258.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed October 18, 2005.

Certification Date November 7, 2005.

Appeal from Mecklenburg (03CRS201020, 03CRS201022).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Cite as 27 I&N Dec. 481 (A.G. 2018) Interim Decision #3943

481

Matter of Daniel Girmai NEGUSIE, Respondent

Decided by Attorney General October 18, 2018

U.S. Department of Justice

Office of the Attorney General

BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(h)(1)(i) (2018), I direct the Board of 

Immigration Appeals (“Board”) to refer this case to me for review of its 

decision. The Board’s decision in this matter is automatically stayed 

pending my review. See Matter of Haddam, A.G. Order No. 2380-2001 

(Jan. 19, 2001). To assist me in my review, I invite the parties to these 

proceedings and interested amici to submit briefs on: Whether coercion 

and duress are relevant to the application of the Immigration and Nationality 

Act’s persecutor bar. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(42), 1158(b)(2)(A)(i), 

1231(b)(3)(B)(i) (2012).

The parties’ briefs shall not exceed 15,000 words and shall be filed on 

or before November 8, 2018. Interested amici may submit briefs not 

exceeding 9,000 words on or before November 15, 2018. The parties may 

submit reply briefs not exceeding 6,000 words on or before November 15, 

2018. All filings shall be accompanied by proof of service and shall be 

submitted electronically to AGCertification@usdoj.gov, and in triplicate to:

United States Department of Justice

Office of the Attorney General, Room 5114

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20530

All briefs must be both submitted electronically and postmarked on or 

before the pertinent deadlines. Requests for extensions are disfavored.
Exhibit 32(a)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of MSW Energy Holdings II LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, John T. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael J.
Gruppuso, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


    /s/ John T. Miller                                   /s/ Michael J. Gruppuso
    ------------------                                   -----------------------
    John T. Miller                                       Michael J. Gruppuso
    Chief Executive Officer                              Chief Financial Officer
    August 12, 2004                                      August 12, 2004
FINAL PROGRAMMATIC ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

(PEIS) FOR SURVEYING AND MAPPING PROJECTS IN U.S. 

WATERS FOR COASTAL AND MARINE DATA ACQUISITION

BASICS OF

UNDERWATER SOUND

The marine and freshwater soundscape is

comprised of natural biological sounds

(e.g., sounds made by animals), natural

physical sounds (e.g., weather and waves),

and human-made sounds (e.g., vessel

traffic).

In air, sounds are typically characterized by their loudness

(intensity) and pitch (frequency). The physical differences

between air and water result in the same sound having

different intensity, pitch, and speed in water compared to in air.

Sound travels much farther in seawater than in air; lowfrequency sounds can travel hundreds of kilometers in

seawater. Sound also generally travels over four times faster

in seawater compared to in air.

Speed of Sound in Air: 340 meters per second (m/s) 

(760 miles per hour [mph])

Speed of Sound in Seawater: 1,500 m/s (3,500 mph)

Sound intensity is measured in decibels (dB) which are scaled using different reference pressures in air and

water; therefore, decibels reported for sounds in air are different than underwater decibels. Decibel values of

underwater sounds represent lower levels of intensity than the same decibel values of sound in air.

NOS activities could potentially contribute to the growing ambient sound levels of the ocean environment.

Given the great differences between how a single sound is received and processed by different animals

(receptors of sound), NOS determined that the impact of underwater sounds would be best assessed at the

receptor level under each biological resource analyzed.

Photo Credits: NOAA Photo Library and USFWS oceanservice.noaa.gov/about/environmental-compliance/surveying-mapping.html
STATE of North Carolina v. Randy REHM.

No. 438P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2004.

L. Jayne Stowers, Winston-Salem, for Rehm.

Alexandra M. Hightower, Assistant Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of August 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2004."
HomeOcean Facts

# What makes the green turtle...green?

## The name of the green sea turtle is derived from the reptile's greenish-colored fat.

Green turtle swimming underwater. 

Adult green turtles are herbivores, which means they eat only plants such as seagrasses and algae. This diet is thought to give them their greenish-colored fat, hence the name, the green turtle. 

Green turtles primarily use three types of habitat – beaches for nesting, open ocean convergence zones as juveniles, and coastal areas for benthic feeding as adults. In the U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico waters, green turtles are found in inshore and nearshore waters from Texas to Massachusetts, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico. In the eastern North Pacific, green turtles have been sighted from Baja California to southern Alaska, but most commonly are seen south of San Diego. Also, in the central Pacific, green turtles are found around most tropical islands, including the Hawaiian Islands. 

Green turtles face a host of threats in the marine environment. Incidental capture in fishing gear is an ongoing threat to green turtles, which also affects many other marine species. Green turtles also suffer from a disease known as fibropapillomatosis in some areas of the world.  The main cause of the historical, worldwide decline of the green turtle was the long-term harvest of eggs, juveniles, and adults from their nesting beaches and feeding grounds. These harvests still continue in some areas of the world, compromising efforts to recover this species.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - NOAA Fisheries: Green Turtle

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4845 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4845

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude overtime pay from 
                             gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

 Ms. Fallin (for herself, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Poe, Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. 
Walberg, Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Carter, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Franks of Arizona, 
 Ms. Foxx, Mr. Price of Georgia, and Mr. Cole of Oklahoma) introduced 
  the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 
                                 Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude overtime pay from 
                             gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF OVERTIME PAY FROM GROSS INCOME.

    (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to items specifically excluded 
from gross income) is amended by inserting after section 139A the 
following new section:

``SEC. 139B. OVERTIME PAY.

    ``(a) In General.--Gross income shall not include any compensation 
required to be paid under section 7(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act 
of 1938 for work in excess of the maximum hours set forth in such 
section.
    ``(b) Exception for Collective Bargaining Agreements.--Subsection 
(a) shall not apply to any compensation received pursuant to 1 or more 
collective bargaining agreements between employee representatives and 1 
or more employers.
    ``(c) Treatment as Wages for Employment Taxes, etc.--Compensation 
described in subsection (a) shall not fail to be treated as wages for 
purposes of this title merely because such compensation is excludible 
from gross income under subsection (a).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for part III of 
subchapter B of chapter 1 of such Code is amended by inserting after 
the item relating to section 139A the following new item:

``Sec. 139B. Overtime pay.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received after December 31, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5131 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5131

 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide criminal penalties 
   for the destruction of memorials, headstones, markers, and graves 
 commemorating persons serving in the Armed Forces on private property.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2008

   Mr. Poe introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide criminal penalties 
   for the destruction of memorials, headstones, markers, and graves 
 commemorating persons serving in the Armed Forces on private property.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lance Corporal Jeremy Burris Act''.

SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF MEMORIALS, 
              HEADSTONES, MARKERS, AND GRAVES COMMEMORATING PERSONS 
              SERVING IN THE ARMED FORCES ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.

    Section 1369 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the heading by inserting ``, headstones, and 
        graves'' after ``memorials'';
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``on public property'';
                    (B) by striking ``armed forces'' and inserting 
                ``Armed Forces''; and
                    (C) by inserting ``, or any grave or headstone or 
                marker marking the grave of any such person,'' after 
                ``United States'';
            (3) in subsection (b)(2) by inserting ``grave, headstone, 
        marker,'' after ``statue,''; and
            (4) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c) For the purposes of this section, the term `grave' includes 
any object placed on such grave to commemorate the veteran or member of 
the Armed Forces of the United States buried in such grave.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      32





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CENTERGISTIC SOLUTIONS, INC. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ricardo
      G. Brutocao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.


January
        18, 2007


By:/s/
                Ricardo G. BrutocaoRicardo
                G. Brutocao
              Chief
                Executive Officer




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of CENTERGISTIC SOLUTIONS, INC. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
      M. Cunningham, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.


January
          18, 2007
 By:/s/
                    David M. CunninghamDavid
                    M. Cunningham
                  Chief
                    Operating Officer and Chief Financial
                  Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.
HomeNews

# October 2016: North Carolina Flooding

## National Geodetic Survey damage assessment imagery available online.

From October 11-16, the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) collected imagery of areas in North Carolina to help assess damage caused by river flooding due to heavy rains from the now-dissipated Matthew. The aerial imagery was collected in specific areas identified by FEMA and the National Weather Service. You can access all of the images collected online. 

Select the round icon with directional arrows using your mouse (or your finger) and slide back and forth to view a "before and after" comparison. "Before" images are provided by Mapbox, Digital Globe, and OpenStreetMap; "After" images were captured by NOAA's National Geodetic Survey in the aftermath of Hurricane Matthew. 

Goldsboro, North Carolina | Download

 Pitt-Greenville Airport, North Carolina | Download

Princeville, North Carolina | Download

A team of NOAA aviators captured the images using specialized remote-sensing cameras aboard NOAA's King Air aircraft flying above the area at an altitude between **500 - 2,000 meters**. 

NOAA's aerial imagery aids safe navigation and captures damage to coastal areas caused by a storm. Aerial imagery is a crucial tool to determine the extent of the damage inflicted by flooding, and to compare baseline coastal areas to assess the damage to major ports and waterways, coastlines, critical infrastructure, and coastal communities. This imagery provides a cost-effective way to better understand the damage sustained to both property and the environment. 

National Geodetic Survey Imagery: Hurricane Matthew

FEMA: Hurricane Matthew Resources

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - National Geodetic Survey
          - NOAA Office of Marine and Aviation Operations
          - NOS Aerial Photography and Shoreline Mapping

Did you know?

NOAA's National Geodetic Survey is the U.S. Government source for precise latitude, longitude, and elevation measurements. The NOAA fleet of ships and aircraft is operated, managed, and maintained by the NOAA Office of Marine and Aviation Operations, which includes commissioned officers of the NOAA Corps and civilian wage mariners.

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -