alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of filing of the following agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the agreements to the Secretary by email at                     *Secretary@fmc.gov,*                     or by mail, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    , and the Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on agreements that request expedited review. Copies of agreements are available through the Commission's website (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     201390.                

*Agreement Name:*                     BAL/Transfar Slot Purchase Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Transfar Shipping Ptd. Ltd. and BAL Container Line Co. Ltd.                

*Filing Party:*                     Neal Mayer; Hoppel, Mayer & Coleman.                

*Synopsis:*                     The Agreement authorizes Transfar to charter slots to BAL on an “as needed, as available” basis in the trade between ports in China and ports on the U.S. Pacific Coast.                

*Proposed Effective Date:*                     6/27/2022.                

*Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/​FMC.Agreements.Web/​Public/​AgreementHistory/​65505.*

Dated: July 1, 2022.

William Cody,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-14459 Filed 7-6-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
STATE v. CUMMMINGS.

No. COA04-1228.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Polk (02CRS50986, 02CRS50988)

Case reported without published opinion No error.
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21

                LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF MCII HOLDINGS (USA), INC.

Each subsidiary is 100% owned by its respective parent Company except as noted.

Motor Coach Industries International, Inc. (Delaware)
      Transportation Manufacturing Operations, Inc. (Delaware)
          BusLease, Inc. (Delaware)

          Hausman Bus Sales, Inc. (Delaware)
          MCI Acceptance Corp. (Delaware)
          MCIL Holdings, Ltd. (Canada)
                   Motor Coach Industries Limited (Canada)
                           Frank Fair Industries Ltd. (Manitoba)

          Motor Coach Industries, Inc. (Delaware)
          Motor Coach Industries-China, Inc. (Delaware)
                   Nanjing Starley Transportation Company Limited (China) (70%)
          TMO Holdings of Canada, Ltd. (Canada)
          Transit Bus International, Inc. (Delaware)
                   Custom Assets Corp. (California)
                   Greyhound Overseas Services, Inc. (Virgin Islands)
                   Transport Technology Corporation (Arizona)
          Universal Coach Parts, Inc. (Delaware)
                   Universal Coach Parts Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (98%)
*Dina Autobuses, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (99.99%)
         Autopartes Hidalguenses, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (99.99%)
         Carrocera Sahagun, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico) (98%)
          **MCII Buses (USA), Inc. (Delaware)

*Became a subsidiary on January 31, 1997.

**Incorporated as a subsidiary on April 17, 1997.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5133 

To increase funding for the program of block grants to States for social 

services. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2008 

Mr. SPACE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To increase funding for the program of block grants to 

States for social services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aiding Social Services 

5 in States Temporarily Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN FUNDING FOR THE SOCIAL SERVICES 

7 BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM. 

8 Section 2003(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 1397b(c)) is amended— 

10 (1) in paragraph (10), by striking ‘‘and’’; 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5133 IH

1 (2) in paragraph (11), by striking the period 

2 and inserting ‘‘other than fiscal year 2008; and’’; 

3 and 

4 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(12) $3,700,000,000 for the fiscal year 

6 2008.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16D0170. ZHI LIN et al. v. INFINITY SAFEGUARD INSURANCE

COMPANY.

We dismissed this application as untimely because it was filed three months

after the trial court’s order dismissing the case. We reasoned that an interim “Motion

to Vacate” filed by plaintiffs Zhi Lin and Jing Ou was, in substance, a motion for

reconsideration that had not extended the time for filing the application. Lin and Ou

now seek reconsideration, urging usto treat the “Motion to Vacate” as a motion to set

aside under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), the denial of which is appealable by timely

application under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). For good cause shown, we herebyGRANT

the motion for reconsideration. We VACATE our previous order dismissing the

application, which is hereby REINSTATED.

Upon review of the merits, however, the application for discretionary appeal

is GRANTED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

02/12/2016

February 12, 2016
# L_2016025EN.01006901.xml

| 2.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 25/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 25/69

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/12 of 6 January 2016 terminating the partial interim review of the anti-dumping and countervailing measures applicable to imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from the People's Republic of China

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 4 of 7 January 2016
  )

On page 8, in recital 64:

for:

‘This Regulation is in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 and by Article 25(1) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009,’,

read:

‘The Committee established by Article 15(1) of the basic anti-dumping Regulation and by Article 25(1) of the basic anti-subsidy Regulation did not deliver an opinion,’.

---
STATE v. FULTON

No. COA04-869

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 3, 2005.

Certification Date May 23, 2005.

Appeal from the Forsyth (02CRS61619).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit 23.2**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form10-K) of CUNO Incorporated (“CUNO”) of our report dated December 11, 2003,included in the 2003 Annual Report to Shareholders of CUNO incorporated byreference in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended October 31,2003, and the related financial statement schedule included therein, filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-39763) pertaining to the CUNO Incorporated1996 Stock Incentive Plan, the CUNO Incorporated Non-Employee Directors’Stock Option Plan, and the CUNO Incorporated Savings and Retirement Planand the registration statement (Form S-8 No. 333-54388) pertaining to theCUNO Incorporated 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and the CUNO IncorporatedNon-employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan of our report dated December 11,2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporatedherein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraphwith respect to the financial statement schedule included in this AnnualReport (Form 10-K) of CUNO.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
- Home
- Facts
- What is an environmental sensitivity index map?

# **What is an environmental sensitivity index map?**

## An environmental sensitivity index map provides a concise **summary of coastal resources** that could be at risk in the event of an oil spill.

*The symbols on an ESI map are color coded and prioritized  for clean up by how sensitive they are to oil.*

Environmental sensitivity index (ESI) maps are a compilation of information about coastal shoreline sensitivity, biological resources, and human  resources. This information is used in planning to create cleanup strategies *before* an accident occurs so that  authorities are prepared to take action in the event of such a spill. Advance planning  reduces the harmful consequences of oil spills and cleanup.

ESI maps have many features that make them great tools for  spill response teams. The maps are created using geographic information system (GIS) techniques in  order to present regional maps with data on biological and human resources in  an area, as well as information on sensitive shorelines. The shoreline resources are  ranked and  color-coded based on their sensitivity to oiling. The data on biological and human resources also use standardized colors and symbols. Organizations  can use the synthesized data to create efficient and effective cleanup strategies. In addition to the maps, the ESI data are available in several digital formats for use within a GIS.

Researchers in the Office of Response and Restoration work with  state, federal, and industrial agencies to create ESI maps.

##### More **Information**

 Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) Maps and Data 

 Redrawing the Coast After Sandy: First Round of Updated Environmental Sensitivity Data Released for Atlantic States

##### **Last updated:**

######  						 01/18/24 					

**Author:** NOAA

How to cite this article

Contact Us

##### 					Feedback

          -  Provide Feedback 
          -  Contact Us
          -  Report an error

##### 					Social

          - 
          - 
          - 
*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
							About NOS						- About Us
- NOS Program Offices
- Media Inquiries
- Website Acknowledgements
- Site Index
- Disclaimer
							More Resources						- Freedom of Information Act
- Accessibility
- Information Quality
- Privacy Policy
- NOS For Employees
- USA.gov
-  Department of Commerce
-  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
-  National Ocean Service
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00571-CV

IN RE D’SPAIN CONSTRUCTION L.L.C.

No. 04-20-00574-CV

IN RE Rowena KNEUPPER

Original Mandamus Proceedings1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 17, 2021

PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED AS MOOT

On November 30, 2020, Relators filed petitions for writs of mandamus and requested stays

of discovery orders pending final resolutions of their petitions. We granted the stays and requested 

responses. Based on the responses, we abated these proceedings to allow the trial court to amend 

or vacate its discovery orders. 

On February 3, 2021, Relators notified this court that the trial court effectively rescinded 

its discovery orders, and Relators asked this court to dismiss their petitions as moot. 

1

These proceedings arise out of Cause No. 20-274, styled D’Spain Construction L.L.C. v. George Samuel Ludolf, 

Individually and as Owner/Manager of GSL Ranch LLC a/k/a GSL Ranch; et al., pending in the 451st Judicial District 

Court, Kendall County, Texas, the Honorable Kirsten Cohoon presiding.
04-20-00571-CV & 04-20-00574-CV

- 2 -

Relators’ requests are granted. The stays imposed on December 1, 2020, are lifted. 

Relators’ petitions for writs of mandamus are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of BIO-keyInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period endedDecember 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Cecilia Welch, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| BIO-KEY  INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
|-----------------------------------|
|                              |
| By:                               | /s/ CECILIA WELCH |   |
|                              | Cecilia Welch |
|                              | Chief Financial Officer |
|                              |
| Date:  March 26, 2010        |

 

1

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 6, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00594

- CR

Bo Jett LITTLETON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR10770

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees ’ second motion for extension of time to file their brief is granted. We order

the brief due on December 9, 2016.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6th day of December, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ROADHOUSE
GRILL, INC.'S FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                             378
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,622
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,584
<PP&E>                                          92,469
<DEPRECIATION>                                     386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,515
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           291
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   105,312
<SALES>                                        148,495
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,495
<CGS>                                          124,177
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  140,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,301
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    83
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,266
<INCOME-TAX>                                       801
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,567
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                         (953)
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,512
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

        In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spirit Finance Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher H. Volk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 8, 2006
|   | /s/ Christopher H. Volk |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Christopher H. Volk     |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by Territory, FY 2022

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

DEFENSE PERSONNEL

By Type

By Service

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions, B = billions) 

Lockheed Martin $4.1 B

Abbott Laboratories $1.9 B

Northrop Grumman $1.6 B

Hensel Phelps Construction $742.6 M

BL Harbert Holdings, LLC $604.8 M

Crowley $544.5 M

Leonardo SpA $503.5 M

General Dynamics $426.5 M

L3Harris Technologies $415.9 M

Webuild $360.6 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

FLORIDA

Allocations, By Type

Allocations, By Service

$8.5 BILLION

TOTAL PAYROLL

132,265

TOTAL PERSONNEL

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active 

Duty

Civilian National 

Guard

Reserve Total

Okaloosa 18,450 7,579 108 2,462 28,599

Duval 13,815 8,795 1,935 3,891 28,436

Escambia 11,505 2,519 181 1,010

Hillsborough 5,693 2,842 483 4,173 13,191

Bay 2,667 3,007 531 238 6,443

Miami-Dade 1,090 1,277 351 3,539 6,257

Orange 235 2,483 365 3,089 6,172

Brevard 1,511 2,535 401 1,384 5,831

Pinellas 55 294 900 1,008 2,257

Palm Beach 58 237 432 1,132 1,859

Construction: 10%

Research and

Development: 5%

Service: 37%

Supplies and

Equipment: 49%

Active Duty: 47%

Civilian: 26%

National 

Guard: 9%

Reserve: 18%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

30%

29%

24%

17%

Army

Navy/Marines

Air Force

Other Defense

23%

40%

34%

3%

$8.7

$18.4

$21.5

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22

#4 #20 5.4% $1,359 #5 #12 #5 #4

$30.2 B SPENT 

IN STATE

2.2% OF 

STATE GDP

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING

PER 

RESIDENT

$21.5 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING

132,265 NUMBER 

OF PERSONNEL

$8.5 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING

$245.6 M GRANT 

SPENDING

$13.7 $13.4 $14.8

$19.8

$17.5

36

15,215
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2022

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FLORIDA

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

FISCAL YEAR 2022

Orange

Brevard

Hillsborough

Bay

Duval

Okaloosa

Pinellas

Escambia

Miami-Dade

Broward

(M = millions, B = billions)

$5.7 B

$4.5 B

$2.7 B

$2.5 B

$1.8 B

$1.3 B

$668.4 M

$624.4 M

$558.4 M

$205.2 M

Okaloosa

Duval

Hillsborough

Escambia

Bay

Brevard

Orange

Miami-Dade

Santa Rosa

Monroe

$2.2 B

$2.0 B

$908.4 M

$804.6 M

$520.5 M

$390.1 M

$360.8 M

$320.4 M

$136.9 M

$106.9 M

37

Bay

Escambia Okaloosa

Bay

Escambia Okaloosa

Santa Rosa

Duval

Orange

Brevard Pinellas

Hillsborough

Broward

Miami-Dade

Duval

Orange

Brevard

Hillsborough

Miami-Dade

Monroe
CAUSE NO. 1 4 CV 0490

PAUL AND CAROLYN HORN, MIKE AND LUCY STACY, PETE AND JUDY
GARCIA AND JANICE FRANKIE

v.

CITY OF FRIENDSWOOD and
MAYOR KEVIN M. HOLLAND § § § § § § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS

212 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF APPEAL

The C ity of Friendswood and Kevin Holland, Defendant s in the above numbered

matter, file this Notice of Interlocutory Appeal pursuant to § 51.014(a)(8) and §

51.014(a)(5) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and desire to appeal the

District Court's April 20, 2015 Order denying Defendants ’ Plea to the Jurisdiction and

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

.

This is an accelerated appeal which will be taken to the 1st or 14th Court of

Appeals.

Respectfully submitted,

CHAMBERLAIN, HRDLICKA WHITE WILLIAMS & AUGHTRY

/s/William S. Helfand
WILLIAM S. HELFAND
SBOT # 09388250
CHARLES T. JEREMIAH
SBOT # 00784338 1200 Smith Street, Suite1400 Houston, Texas 77002 (713) 654-9630 (713) 658-2553
Bill.helfand@chamberlainlaw.com Charles.jeremiah@chamberlainlaw.com Filed: 5/8/2015 4:13:47 PM JOHN D. KINARD - District Clerk Galveston County, Texas Envelope No. 5218148 By: Shailja Dixit 5/8/2015 4:17:22 PM

ACCEPTED 01-15-00436-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/13/2015 11:53:36 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERKA TTORNEYS FOR D EFENDANT

, C ITY OF F RIE NDSWOOD

, T EXAS

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was forwarded in
accordance with the local rules , via facsimile, hand

- delivery, and/or certified mail, return receipt requested, on this 8 th day of Ma y , 201 5 to the following:

Aaron Pool James T. Sunosky Donato Minx Brown & Pool, PC 3200 Southwest Freeway, Suite 2300 Houston, Texas 77027

/s/ William S. Helfand

1891224_1

2