alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
$35.8 $32.9 $32.1 $32.1

FY13 FY14

$30.4

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

CALIFORNIA 

#3 #28 10.3% $1,550 #3 #1 #2

$61.0 B SPENT IN 1.9% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $44.0 B CONTRACT 285,922 NUMBER $17.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING OF PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 6% Research and

Development: 14%

Supplies and

Equipment: 38% 

Service: 43%

By Service 

Army

12%

Navy/Marines

42%

Air Force

28%

Other Defense

18%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 13%

National 

Guard: 6%

Civilian: 23% Active Duty: 57%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

16%

Navy/Marines

67%

Air Force

15%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Northrop Grumman

Centene Corp.

Boeing

Lockheed Martin

General Atomics

Raytheon

Houdstermaatschappij Wilg BV

General Dynamics

Aerospace Corp.

Environmental Chemical Corp.

(M = millions, B = billions)

$4.1 B

$3.1 B

$3.1 B

$2.5 B

$2.2 B

$1.9 B

$1.6 B

$1.5 B

$1.0 B

$747.0 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$44.9 $44.0 $40.5

$17.0 BILLION 285,922

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National Reserve Total

Duty Guard

San Diego 82,023 24,530 852 9,042 116,447

San Bernardino 13,582 3,494 794 441 18,311

Los Angeles 2,036 3,560 3,088 4,733 13,417

Ventura 4,574 6,110 1,149 1,230 13,063

Solano 6,975 1,728 294 3,325 12,322

Kern 2,623 8,742 214 348 11,927

Riverside 422 2,881 1,275 5,141 9,719

Monterey 4,999 4,131 86 406 9,622

Kings 6,731 906 0 497 8,134

Orange 462 1,128 2,218 3,659 7,467

26 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

CALIFORNIA FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

San Diego

Los Angeles

Orange

Santa Clara

Sacramento

Kern

Ventura

Alameda

Santa Barbara

Monterey

(M = millions, B = billions)

$13.5 B

$9.9 B

$4.5 B

$3.7 B

$3.6 B 

$1.9 B

$1.2 B

$870.0 M

$703.0 M

$622.5 M

San Diego

Ventura

Kern

San Bernardino

Monterey

Solano

Los Angeles

Kings

Riverside

Yuba

$7.0 B

$983.3 M

$973.1 M

$863.5 M

$739.6 M

$735.0 M

$710.8 M

$471.7 M

$453.7 M

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020 27

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

$379.5 M

Sacramento

Alameda

Santa Clara

Monterey

Santa Barbara

San Diego

Los Angeles

Ventura

Orange

Yuba

Solano

Kings

San Bernardino

Monterey

Los Angeles

Ventura

Kern

San Diego

Riverside

Kern
# L_2020035DE.01005101.xml

| 7.2.2020 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 35/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.2.2020

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 35/51

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2016/2031 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 26. Oktober 2016 über Maßnahmen zum Schutz vor Pflanzenschädlingen, zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EU) Nr. 228/2013, (EU) Nr. 652/2014 und (EU) Nr. 1143/2014 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinien 69/464/EWG, 74/647/EWG, 93/85/EWG, 98/57/EG, 2000/29/EG, 2006/91/EG und 2007/33/EG des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 317 vom 23. November 2016
  )

Seite 71, Artikel 111 Nummer 7:

Anstatt:

„7.   In Artikel 20 wird folgender Buchstabe vor Buchstabe a eingefügt:

| ‚a) | Kosten für visuelle Untersuchungen;‘“ |
| --- | --- |

‚a)

Kosten für visuelle Untersuchungen;‘“

muss es heißen:

„7.   In Artikel 20 wird folgender Buchstabe vor Buchstabe a eingefügt:

| ‚-a) | Kosten für visuelle Untersuchungen;‘“. |
| --- | --- |

‚-a)

Kosten für visuelle Untersuchungen;‘“.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5249 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5249

          To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-[[3-
     (Acetylamino)phenyl]amino]-1-amino-9,10-dihydro- 9,10-dioxo-2-
               anthracenesulfonic acid, monosodium salt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2008

   Mr. Watt introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 4-[[3-
     (Acetylamino)phenyl]amino]-1-amino-9,10-dihydro- 9,10-dioxo-2-
               anthracenesulfonic acid, monosodium salt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-[[3-(ACETYLAMINO)PHENYL]AMINO]-1-AMINO-9,10-DIHYDRO- 9,10-
              DIOXO-2-ANTHRACENESULFONIC ACID, MONOSODIUM SALT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.02 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to 4-[[3-
(Acetylamino)phenyl]amino]-1-amino-9,10-dihydro- 9,10-dioxo-2-
anthracenesulfonic acid, monosodium salt) is amended by striking ``12/
31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EX-32.1 6 ex32x1.htm EXHIBIT 32.1



EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of i\Information Architects Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009, the undersigned William Craig hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





February 24, 2011



By: /s/ William Craig

William Craig, Acting CEO





* * * * *



A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5123 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5123

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pyrimethanil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2008

 Mr. Hulshof introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Pyrimethanil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PYRIMETHANIL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.36 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Pyrimethanil) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Johnny Wayne HYDE.

No. 529A98-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 3, 2005.

Edwin L. West, III, Wilmington, Richard McNeill, for Johnny Wayne Hyde.

Edwin W. Welch, Special Deputy Attorney General, G. Dewey Hudson, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*AMENDED ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th day of September 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Onslow County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of November 2005."

Justice WAINWRIGHT recused.
# L_2016039EN.01005901.xml

| 16.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 39/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 39/59

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION (EU) 2016/210

of 12 February 2016

concerning the discharge to be given to the Commission in respect of the implementation of the operations of the European Development Fund (eighth EDF) for the financial year 2014

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the fourth ACP-EEC Convention, signed at Lomé on 15 December 1989 (1) and amended by the Agreement signed in Mauritius on 4 November 1995 (2),

Having regard to the Internal Agreement between the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the financing and administration of the Community aid under the Second Financial Protocol to the fourth ACP-EC Convention (3) (the ‘Internal Agreement’) setting up, amongst others, the eighth European Development Fund (eighth EDF), and in particular Article 33(3) thereof,

Having regard to the Financial Regulation of 16 June 1998 applicable to development finance cooperation under the fourth ACP-EC Convention (4), and in particular Articles 66 to 74 thereof,

Having examined the revenue and expenditure account and the balance sheet relating to the operations of the eighth EDF as at 31 December 2014 and the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on the activities funded by the 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th European Development Funds (EDFs) concerning the financial year 2014, together with the Commission's replies contained in that Annual Report (5),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 33(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the eighth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 33(3) of the Internal Agreement, the discharge for the financial management of the eighth EDF is to be given to the Commission by the European Parliament on the recommendation of the Council.

| (2) | The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the eighth EDF during the financial year 2014 has been satisfactory, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The overall implementation by the Commission of the operations of the eighth EDF during the financial year 2014 has been satisfactory,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the European Parliament give the Commission a discharge in respect of the implementation of the operations of the eighth EDF for the financial year 2014.

Done at Brussels, 12 February 2016.

For the Council

The President

J.R.V.A. DIJSSELBLOEM

---

(1)  
  OJ L 229, 17.8.1991, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 156, 29.5.1998, p. 3.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 156, 29.5.1998, p. 108.

3

(4)  
  OJ L 191, 7.7.1998, p. 53.

4

(5)  
  OJ C 373, 10.11.2015, p. 289.

5

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Ivory Joe TISDALE.

No. 149P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Ivory Joe Tisdale, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th day of March 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Guilford County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
62 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

MICHIGAN 

#24

$6.5 B SPENT IN 

STATE 

#41

1.1% OF STATE GDP

1.2%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

DEFENSE SPENDING 

$649

PER RESIDENT 

#22

$5.1 B CONTRACT 

SPENDING 

#30 

26,133 NUMBER OF 

PERSONNEL 

#30 

$1.4 B PERSONNEL 

SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Construction: 0%

Supplies and

Equipment: 77%

By Service 

Army

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

8%

Other Defense

13%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Research and

Development: 7%

Service: 16%

71%

Top Defense Contractors 

General Dynamics

Rolls-Royce Solutions America

Williams International Co. LLC

ManTech

BAE Systems

American Tooling Center, Inc.

Loc Performance Products

General Electric

Peckham Vocational Industries

L3Harris Technologies

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$5.1 $5.1

$4.2

FY18

$4.4

$3.0

FY16

$2.6 $2.2

$0.7

FY14 FY15 FY17 FY19 FY20 FY21

$1.4 BILLION 26,133

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Macomb 231 6,785 1,458

Calhoun 49 1,277 1,026

Wayne 153 346 1,353

Kalamazoo 13 90 928 

Clinton ND ND 1,232

Kent 84 96 723 

Oakland 56 232 179 

Ingham 165 486 148 

Eaton 36 67 522 

Saginaw ND ND 325 

(M = millions, B = billions)

$2.3 B

$194.0 M

$161.1 M

$145.4 M

$121.5 M

$97.7 M

$97.0 M

$95.6 M

$90.8 M

$89.6 M

Reserve

1,090

323 

443 

730 

132 

257 

519 

23 

ND 

256

Total

9,564

2,675

2,295

1,761

ND 

1,160

986

822 

ND 

ND 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 4% Reserve: 17%

Civilian: 38%

National 

Guard: 42%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

74%

Navy/Marines

8%

Air Force

13%

Other Defense

6%
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

MICHIGAN 

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Macomb

Oakland

Wayne

Kent

Ingham

Muskegon

Washtenaw

Wexford

Dickinson

Clinton

(M = millions)

$3.0 B 

$576.2 M

$279.7 M

$217.6 M

$154.4 M

$141.4 M

$130.5 M

$109.9 M

$77.3 M 

$68.8 M

Macomb

Calhoun

Wayne

Clinton

Kalamazoo

Ingham

Oakland

Kent

Eaton

Washtenaw

$797.3 M 

$158.8 M

$92.6 M

$65.9 M

$44.3 M

$43.1 M

$42.1 M

$36.7 M

$24.2 M

$20.0 M

Dickinson

Wexford

Muskegon

Macomb

Wayne

Kent

Oakland

Clinton

Washtenaw

Ingham

Eaton

Calhoun

Kent

Macomb

Wayne

Oakland

Clinton

Washtenaw

Ingham

Kalamazoo

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 63

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Thomas J. Putman, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2005;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) [Intentionally Omitted];  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date:August 15, 2005         /s/ Thomas J. Putman   Thomas J. Putman   President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5233 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5233

  To extend for two years the exemption of returning workers from the 
           numerical limitations for H-2B temporary workers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2008

  Mrs. Drake introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend for two years the exemption of returning workers from the 
           numerical limitations for H-2B temporary workers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Giving Relief to Our Small 
Businesses Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF RETURNING WORKER EXEMPTION TO H-2B NUMERICAL 
              LIMITATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 214(g)(9)(A) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)(9)(A)) is amended by striking ``an 
alien who has already been counted toward the numerical limitation of 
paragraph (1)(B) during fiscal year 2004, 2005, or 2006 shall not again 
be counted toward such limitation during fiscal year 2007.'' and 
inserting ``an alien who has already, during any 1 of the 3 preceding 
fiscal years, been counted toward the numerical limitation of paragraph 
(1)(B) shall not again be counted toward such limitation during fiscal 
year 2008 or 2009.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if enacted on October 1, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. BROWN.

No. COA04-737.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the New Hanover (02CRS25841, 02CRS258443)

Case reported without published opinion No error in defendant's trial; remanded for resentencing.
STATE v. BRODIE.

No. COA05-9.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed September 6, 2005.

Certification September 26, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. BALL

No. COA04-1582

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Henderson (03CRS55975, 04CRS2631).

Case without published opinion. No error.
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002           

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Salamon
Group, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30,
2008 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: August 14, 2008 | By: | /s/
      John E. Salamon
|---------------------- | --- | -------------------------
|                       |     | John E. Salamon          
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer  
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer  

---
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5183 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cis-3-Hexen-1-ol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2008 

Mrs. MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on cis-3-Hexen1-ol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CIS-3-HEXEN-1-OL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.02.99 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 cis-3-Hexen-1-ol) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5183 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth
in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Frederic H. Moll, M.D., in his capacity as Chief
Executive Officer of Hansen Medical, Inc., hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (i) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Hansen Medical, Inc.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 16, 2009



/S/ FREDERIC H. MOLL,
M.D.Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Hansen Medical, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or
after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.