Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2022 / Notices 38179 

patrimony, emblematic of the military 

and diplomatic history of the Pawnee 

Nation in the nineteenth century and in 

particular during the Indian Wars on the 

Great Plains, when the Pawnee Nation 

was a military ally of the United States. 

Determinations Made by the American 

Numismatic Society 

Officials of the American Numismatic 

Society have determined that: 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(B), 

the one cultural item described above is 

reasonably believed to have been placed 

with or near the human remains of a 

Native American at the time of death or 

later as part of the death rite or 

ceremony of the Pawnee Nation of 

Oklahoma and is believed, by a 

preponderance of the evidence, to have 

been removed from the burial site of a 

Native American individual. 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(3)(D), 

the one cultural item described above 

has an ongoing historical, traditional, or 

cultural importance central to the 

Native American group or culture itself, 

rather than property owned by an 

individual. 

• Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there 

is a relationship of shared group 

identity that can be reasonably traced 

between the unassociated funerary 

object and object of cultural patrimony 

and the Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma. 

Additional Requestors and Disposition 

Lineal descendants or representatives 

of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian 

organization not identified in this notice 

that wish to claim this cultural item 

should submit a written request with 

information in support of the claim to 

Dr. Gilles Bransbourg, Executive 

Director, American Numismatic Society, 

75 Varick Street, 11th Floor, New York, 

NY 10013, telephone (212) 571–4470, 

email gbransbourg@numismatics.org, by 

July 27, 2022. After that date, if no 

additional claimants have come 

forward, transfer of control of the 

unassociated funerary object and object 

of cultural patrimony to the Pawnee 

Nation of Oklahoma may proceed. 

The American Numismatic Society is 

responsible for notifying the Pawnee 

Nation of Oklahoma that this notice has 

been published. 

Dated: June 10, 2022. 

Melanie O’Brien, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2022–13619 Filed 6–24–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1320] 

Certain Universal Golf Club Shaft and 

Golf Club Head Connection Adaptors, 

Certain Components Thereof, and 

Products Containing the Same; Notice 

of Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on May 

19, 2022, under section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of 

Club-Conex, LLC of Scottsdale, Arizona. 

The complaint alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain universal golf club shaft and golf 

club head connection adaptors, certain 

components thereof, and products 

containing the same by reason of the 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 7,857,709 (‘‘the ’709 patent’’) 

and U.S. Patent No. 8,562,454 (‘‘the ’454 

patent’’). The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists as required by the applicable 

Federal Statute. The complainant 

requests that the Commission institute 

an investigation and, after the 

investigation, issue a limited exclusion 

order and a cease and desist order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2021). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

June 21, 2022, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 

1–5 and 8–14 of the ’709 patent and 

claims 1–16 of the ’454 patent, whether 

an industry in the United States exists 

as required by subsection (a)(2) of 

section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘golf club connection 

adaptors, which are used to quickly and 

easily, but reversibly, assemble a golf 

club shaft with a golf club head in a 

secure fashion, components thereof, 

such as shaft adapters, hosel adapters, 

and compression nuts, and products 

containing the same’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Club-Conex, 

LLC, 7327 E Tierra Buena Lane, 

Scottsdale, AZ 85260. 

(b) The respondent is the following 

entity alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and is the party upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Top Golf Equipment Co. Limited, #2021 

Renmin Road, Longhua District, 

Shenzhen GuangDong, China 518131. 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondent in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
38180 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2022 / Notices 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of the respondent to file a 

timely response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: June 21, 2022. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2022–13609 Filed 6–24–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1241] 

Certain Electrical Connectors and 

Cages, Components Thereof, and 

Products Containing the Same; 

Commission Determination To Review 

in Part a Final Initial Determination; 

Request for Written Submissions on 

Certain Issues Under Review and on 

Remedy, the Public Interest, and 

Bonding; Extension of the Target Date 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined to review in part a final 

initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of the 

presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’). The Commission requests 

written submissions from the parties on 

certain issues under review and 

submissions from the parties, interested 

government agencies, and other 

interested persons on the issues of 

remedy, the public interest, and 

bonding, under the schedule set forth 

below. The Commission also extends 

the target date to September 8, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amanda P. Fisherow, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–2737. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

January 26, 2021, the Commission 

instituted this investigation under 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based on a 

complaint filed by Amphenol Corp. of 

Wallingford, Connecticut (‘‘Amphenol,’’ 

or ‘‘Complainant’’). 86 FR 7104–05 (Jan. 

26, 2021). The complaint alleged a 

violation of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

electrical connectors and cages, 

components thereof, and products 

containing the same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 7,371,117 (‘‘the ’117 

patent’’); 8,371,875 (‘‘the ’875 patent’’); 

8,864,521 (‘‘the ’521 Patent’’); 9,705,255 

(‘‘the ’255 patent’’); and 10,381,767 

(‘‘the ’767 patent’’). The complaint also 

alleged the existence of a domestic 

industry. The notice of investigation 

named as respondents: Luxshare 

Precision Industry Co., Ltd. and 

Dongguan Luxshare Precision Industry 

Co. Ltd., both of Dongguan City, China; 

Luxshare Precision Limited (HK) of 

Fotan, Hong Kong; and Luxshare-ICT 

Inc. of Milpitas, California (collectively, 

‘‘Luxshare,’’ or ‘‘Respondents’’). Id. at 

7104. The Commission’s Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations is not 

named as a party in this investigation. 

Id. 

Subsequently, the ALJ granted 

Complainant’s motion for partial 

termination of the investigation by 

withdrawal of the ’875 and the ’521 

patents, and claims 2, 14, 17–19, and 

25–27 of the ’117 patent; claims 1–3, 5– 

8, and 18 of the ’255 patent; and claims 

2–3, 7, 14, 20–22, 30, and 32 of the ’767 

patent. See Order No. 29 (Oct. 13, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Nov. 3, 

2021). The ALJ also granted in part and 

denied in part Complainant’s motion for 

summary determination that it has 

satisfied the importation requirement. 

See Order No. 34 (Oct. 28, 2021), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Nov. 29, 

2021). The ALJ also granted in part 

Luxshare’s motion for summary 

determination that the importation 

requirement has not been met for certain 

products. See Order No. 35. On 

November 29, 2021, the Commission 

determined to review that 

determination. Comm’n Notice (Nov. 29, 

2021). 

On March 11, 2022, the ALJ issued 

the final ID. On March 25, 2022, 

Complainant petitioned for review of 

the final ID. On April 4, 2022, 

Respondents filed a response. 

Having reviewed the record of the 

investigation, including the final ID, the 

parties’ submissions to the ALJ and the 

Commission, the Commission has 

determined to review the ID in part. 

Specifically, the Commission has 

determined to review the ID’s findings 

on (1) importation, including any 

findings impacted by the determination 

on importation; (2) the Redesigned 

Products; (3) infringement for claim 9 of 

the ’117 patent; (4) the construction of 

the term ‘‘contact tail adapted for 

attachment to the printed circuit board 

that is perpendicular to the . . . printed 

circuit board’’ of the ’767 patent; (5) 

infringement analysis for claims 1, 4–6, 

9–13, 15–17, 19, and 23 of the ’767 

patent; (6) the technical prong findings 

for the ’767 patent; (7) obviousness for 

the ’767 patent; and (8) the economic 

prong of domestic industry analysis. 

In connection with its review, the 

Commission requests responses to the 

following question. The parties are 

requested to brief their positions with 

reference to the applicable law and the 

existing evidentiary record. 

(1) Please address whether Complainant 

waived the argument that the QSFP 2x1 SMT 

products are representative of the QSFP 2x1 

Press-fit products. Please include citations to 

the record before the ALJ. 

The parties are invited to brief only 

the discrete question identified above. 

The parties are not to brief other issues 

on review, which are adequately 

presented in the parties’ existing filings. 

In connection with the final 

disposition of this investigation, the 

statute authorizes issuance of, inter alia, 

(1) an exclusion order that could result 

in the exclusion of the subject articles 

from entry into the United States; and/ 

or (2) cease and desist orders that could 

result in the respondents being required 

to cease and desist from engaging in 

unfair acts in the importation and sale 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1