alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Construction: 5% 

d

: 29%

Service: 64%

Research and

Development: 

NEVADA 

#36 #31 0.5% $976 #37 #33 #31

$3.1 B SPENT IN 1.7% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $1.8 B CONTRACT 22,621 NUMBER OF $1.2 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Supplies an

Equipment

3%

By Service 

Army

18%

Navy/Marines

9%

Air Force

58%

Other Defense

14%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 14%

National

0%

Active D

Guard: 2

uty: 53%

Civilian: 13%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

23%

Navy/Marines

10%

Air Force

66%

Other Defense

1%

Top Defense Contractors (M = millions)

Sierra Nevada Corp. $439.9 M

JT4 $316.0 M

M1 Support Services $107.3 M

Walsh Construction Co. II $75.5 M

Hamilton Bonaduz AG $61.8 M

Draken International Inc. $54.7 M

Beaverfit North America $47.5 M

Day & Zimmermann Group $37.5 M

Korte Construction Co. (KCC) $37.0 M

AECOM $31.1 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$2.0

FY13

$1.8 $1.8 $1.8

$1.5 $1.4 $1.4 $1.3

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

$1.2 BILLION 22,621

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Reserve Total

Clark 10,754 1,976 2,036 3,065 17,831

Washoe 39 373 1,837 ND ND

Churchill 1,104 318 112 189 1,723

Carson City ND 197 487 0 ND

Mineral 0 46 0 0 46

Elko 0 ND 25 0 ND

Storey ND 0 0 0 ND

Humboldt ND 0 ND 0 ND

Nye ND ND 0 0 ND

Douglas 0 ND 0 0 ND

74 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020
FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020 75

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

 

(M=millions)

=

NEVADA 

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (K = thousands, M = millions, B billions)

Clark

Washoe

Storey

Churchill

Mineral

Lyon

Douglas

Carson City

Elko

Esmeralda

(K = thousands, M = millions)

$1.1 B

$534.0 M

$73.1 M

$68.8 M 

$65.9 M

$18.6 M

$8.4 M 

$8.0 M

$4.1 M

$816.7 K

Clark

Churchill

Washoe

Carson City

Mineral

Storey

Elko

Nye

Douglas

Humboldt

$995.2 M

$105.4 M

$81.5 M

$35.4 M

$3.4 M 

$739.1 K

$408.1 K

$177.7 K

$164.4 K

$115.0 K

Washoe

Carson City

Douglas

Esmeralda

Elko

Churchill

Lyon

Storey

Mineral

Clark

Washoe

Elko

Carson City

Douglas

Churchill

Storey

Mineral

Clark

Humboldt

Nye
# Introduction

mailto:tara.a.butler4.civ@mail.mil

# Table of Contents

# 1.Contract Spending by State

# 2.Contract Spending by Cnty

# 3.Top Defense Vendors

# 4.Contract Spending by Type

# 5.Contract Spending by Svc

# 6.DoD Personnel Nbrs, by State

# 7.DoD Personnel Nbrs, by Cnty

# 8.DoD Personnel by Type

# 9.DoD Personnel by Service

# 10.DoD Prnl Spending, by State

# 11.DoD Prnl Spending, by Cnty

# 12.Ttl Def. Spending by State

# 13.Def Spending as % State GDP

# 14.Pct of Ttl U.S. Def. Spend

# 15.Def. Spending per Resident

# 16.All Stats, FY2020
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 126 (Friday, July 1, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 39520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14076]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than August 1, 2022.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (Brent B. Hassell, Assistant 
Vice President) P.O. Box 27622, Richmond, Virginia 23261, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5c1f3331313932282f723d2c2c30353f3d283533322f1c2e353f34723a2e3e72332e3b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9ad9f5f7f7fff4eee9b4fbeaeaf6f3f9fbeef3f5f4e9dae8f3f9f2b4fce8f8b4f5e8fd">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Burke and Herbert Financial Services Corp., Alexandria, 
Virginia; to become a bank holding company by acquiring Burke and 
Herbert Bank and Trust Company, Alexandria, Virginia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2022-14076 Filed 6-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVEOFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Thefollowing certification accompanies the issuer’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB,for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, and is not filed, asprovided in Release 33-8212, 34-47551.

 

Inconnection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Treaty Oak Bancorp, Inc.(“Treaty Oak”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Terry W. Hamann, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Treaty Oak, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

 

(1)                                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Treaty Oak.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Treaty Oak and will be retained by Treaty Oak and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 
| Dated: August 12,  2005 |                                   |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                         |                                   |
|                         |                                   |
|                         | /s/ Terry W.  Hamann                   |   |
|                         | Terry W. Hamann                        |
|                         | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
50 MURRAY STREET ACQUISITION LLC, Petitioner v. John KUZMICH, et al.

No. 19-554

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Antonio GAINES.

No. 233P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

James N. Freeman, Jr., for Antonio Gaines.

Diane Martin Pomper, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th day of May 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4823 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Sulfentrazone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. LAHOOD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on 

Sulfentrazone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SULFENTRAZONE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.25.57 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Sulfentrazone) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘(provided for in subheading 

8 2935.00.75)’’ and inserting ‘‘(provided for in sub9 heading 2935.00.75) and any formulations con10 taining such compound (provided for in subheading 

11 3808.93.15)’’; 


HMOORE on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HR 4823 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘1.2%’’ and inserting ‘‘3.2%’’; 

2 and 

3 (3) in the effective period column, by striking 

4 the date contained therein and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

5 2011’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) apply to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

8 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


HMOORE on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              80,047
<SECURITIES>                                        50,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                      829,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (66,363)
<INVENTORY>                                         28,961
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   970,052
<PP&E>                                             229,195
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (75,303)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,488,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,302,994
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                          1,022
<COMMON>                                            49,416
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,616,025
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,488,675
<SALES>                                          4,405,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,405,964
<CGS>                                            3,923,299
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,241,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   399,770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  38,916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,274,388)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,274,388)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      38,157
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,236,231)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.11)




</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Bruce D. Hansen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Moly, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of General Moly, Inc.

 
| Dated:   May 2, 2011 |                            |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                      |                            |
|                      | By:                             | /s/   Bruce D. Hansen |
|                      | Name:                           | Bruce   D. Hansen |
|                      | Title:                          | Chief   Executive Officer |
|                      | (Principal   Executive Officer) |

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4844 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4844

  To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing n-butyl-1,2-
     benzisothiazolin-3-one (Butyl benzisothiazoline technical), 1-
 hydroxypyridine-2-thione, zinc salt (Zinc pyrithione) and application 
                               adjuvants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

 Mr. Reynolds introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing n-butyl-1,2-
     benzisothiazolin-3-one (Butyl benzisothiazoline technical), 1-
 hydroxypyridine-2-thione, zinc salt (Zinc pyrithione) and application 
                               adjuvants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING N-BUTYL-1,2-BENZISOTHIAZOLIN-3-ONE 
              (BUTYL BENZISOTHIAZOLINE TECHNICAL), 1-HYDROXYPYRIDINE-2-
              THIONE, ZINC SALT (ZINC PYRITHIONE) AND APPLICATION 
              ADJUVANTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902._._        Mixtures            Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         containing n-                                                      31/2011
                         butyl-1,2-
                         benzisothiazolin-
                         3-one (Butyl
                         benzisothiazoline
                         technical) (CAS
                         No. 4299-07-4), 1-
                         hydroxypyridine-2-
                         thione, zinc salt
                         (Zinc pyrithione)
                         (CAS No. 13463-41-
                         7) and
                         application
                         adjuvants
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         3808.99.08)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE of North Carolina v. Jami Tor ALLAH.

No. 103P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 30, 2005.

Stephen D. Keiss, Greenville, for Jami Tor Allah.

Rudy Renfer, Assistant Attorney General, Seth Edwards, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of February 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of June 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                        17,057,407
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,775,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,176,395
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              23,112,820
<PP&E>                                        10,076,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,793,540
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                30,205,166
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,620,627
<BONDS>                                          818,648
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          12,082
<OTHER-SE>                                    26,420,931
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  30,205,166
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,868,461
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 699,974
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                29,342
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   66,693
<INCOME-TAX>                                      28,020
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               38,673
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      38,673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .01


</TABLE>
BLUE RIDGE HEALTH INVESTORS, LLC v. MARS SYSTEMS, INC.

No. COA04-1248.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 5, 2005.

Certification Date July 25, 2005.

Appeal from the Forsyth (04CVD964).

Case without published opinion. Affirmed.
<PAGE>

                               EXHIBIT (10)(b)(3)
<PAGE>

                                    AMENDMENT

      Reference is made to a Special Termination Agreement dated September 4,
1986 by and between The Hibernia Savings Bank ("Bank") and Mark A. Osborne
("Executive").

      WHEREAS, the Executive and the Bank are parties to an Employment
Agreement dated January 2, 1991;

      WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Special Termination Agreement,
dated September 4, 1986,

      NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Bank and the Executive
agree as follows:

     1.     Paragraph 3(a) is amended by adding the words "after a
            Change in Control" after the word "Bank" in line 3 of
            paragraph 3.

     2.     Paragraph 8 of the Special Termination Agreement dated
            September 4, 1986 is hereby deleted in its entirety
            and in its place is inserting the following:

                  "In the event that the Executive retains legal counsel
                  and/or incurs any other costs or expenses in connection
                  with the enforcement of any or all of the Executive's
                  rights under this Agreement, the Bank shall pay (or the
                  Executive shall be entitled to recover from the Bank, as
                  the case may be) the Executive's reasonable attorneys' fees
                  and other reasonable costs and expenses in connection with
                  the enforcement of the Executive's rights, regardless of
                  whether the Executive prevails on the merits of such
                  claims, so long as such claims are made in good faith";
<PAGE>

      3.   In all other respects, the terms and provisions of the Special
           Termination Agreement dated September 4, 1986 shall remain. in
           full force and effect.

      Executed as of the 2nd day of January, 1991.

                                           THE HIBERNIA SAVINGS BANK

                                           BY: /s/ [ILLEGIBLE]
                                               -----------------------------

/s/ [ILLEGIBLE]                            /s/ MARK A. OSBORNE    
---------------------------------          ---------------------------------
                                           MARK A. OSBORNE
106 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020

UTAH 

#29 #19 0.9% $1,653 #26 #25 #23

$5.4 B SPENT IN 2.6% OF STATE GDP OF TOTAL U.S. PER RESIDENT $3.5 B CONTRACT 32,949 NUMBER OF $1.9 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and Construction: 3% 

Development: 9%

Service: 33%

Supplies and

Equipment: 54%

By Service 

Army

15%

Navy/Marines

41%

Air Force

36%

Other Defense

8%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Reserve: 15% Active Duty: 14%

National 

Guard: 22%

Civilian: 50%

Top Defense Personnel Locations

Allocations, By Service 

Army

32%

Navy/Marines

3%

Air Force

61%

Other Defense

4%

Top Defense Contractors 

Northrop Grumman

L3Harris Technologies

Boeing

Berkshire Hathaway

Utah State University

Albany International Corp.

Carahsoft Technology

Clyde Companies Inc.

Biofire Defense

Moog

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.2 B

$468.2 M

$153.8 M

$116.0 M

$96.9 M

$88.1 M

$79.3 M

$75.0 M

$68.6 M

$43.5 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$3.5

$2.6

$2.0 $1.7 $1.7 $1.6

FY13 FY14

$1.3 $1.3

FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20

$1.9 BILLION 32,949

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

County

Davis

Salt Lake

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Washington

Cache

Box Elder

Sanpete

Iron

Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

4,260 13,762 ND 

197 1,218 4,617

20 1,145 155

58 40 1,002

50 104 351

ND 19 295

ND ND 87

ND 52 86

0 ND 110

ND ND 107

Reserve

1,329

2,653

0

181 

521

62

82

0

0

0

Total

ND 

8,685

1,320

1,281

1,026

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 

ND 
Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2020 107

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018 UTAH 

FISCAL YEAR 2020 

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS (M=millions)

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions) (M=millions) (M=millions)

Salt Lake

Davis

Utah

Weber

Cache

Tooele

Box Elder

Washington

Summit

Wasatch

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.9 B

$811.3 M

$275.1 M

$210.9 M

$145.5 M

$67.6 M

$29.2 M

$6.2 M

$4.1 M

$2.8 M

Davis

Salt Lake

Tooele

Utah

Weber

Washington

Box Elder

Cache

Iron

Sanpete

$1.4 B

$338.2 M

$89.2 M

$40.4 M

$28.4 M

$7.3 M

$6.1 M

$5.5 M

$2.6 M

$2.0 M

Box Elder Weber

Summit

Tooele

Wasatch

Cache

Davis

Utah

Salt Lake

Washington

Box Elder

Tooele

Utah

Davis

Iron

Sanpete

Salt Lake

Cache

Weber

Washington