alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CertificatePursuant to Rule 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Anthony J.Nocchiero, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report of Merisant Company;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

# 3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

# 4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

# (a)                                  Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

# (b)                                 Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

# (c)                                  Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

# 5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

# (a)                                  Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

# (b)                                 Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

Date:  August 11, 2006
|        |   | /s/ Anthony J. Nocchiero       |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------|
|   |   | Name: Anthony J. Nocchiero     |
|   |   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wind Works Power Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  3.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.     Date:  May 14, 2009  By: /s/ W. Campbell Birge ----------------- W. Campbell Birge Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 20, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-30399

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTOINE THOMPSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:03-CR-70-ALL-K

--------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antoine Thompson appeals the sentence imposed following his

plea of guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. The

sentence was increased for Thompson’s felonious possession of

crack cocaine in connection with the firearm offense. See

U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) (Nov. 2002). 

The record plainly establishes that Thompson agreed with the

Government’s “Factual Basis” which stated that the Government

“would prove” possession of both the firearm and the drugs. 
No. 04-30399

-2-

Further, the PSR contained sufficient indicia of reliability to

establish drug possession, and Thompson offered nothing to show

that the PSR was “materially untrue, inaccurate or unreliable.” 

See United States v. Ayala, 47 F.3d 688, 690 (5th Cir. 1995).

Thompson also contends that the increased sentence was

unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington, 124 S. Ct. 2531

(2004). He concedes that this challenge is foreclosed by United

States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464 (5th Cir. 2004), and he raises

the issue only to preserve it for possible Supreme Court review. 

Blakely would afford Thompson no relief in any event because

Thompson admitted the drug possession when he agreed with the

factual basis recited in open court. See Blakely, 124 S. Ct. at

2537 (admission by defendant supports sentence increase).

The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 3.1


DEAN HELLER             Articles of Incorporation     FILED #C21012-00
Secretary of State        (Pursuant to NRS 78)          AUG 3, 2000
101 N. Carson St. Ste. 3                              IN THE OFFICE OF
Carson City, NV 59701-4736                               Dean Heller
773-634-5708                                    Dean Heller Secretary of State

1. NAME OF CORPORATION:   GREEN MT. LABS., INC.
                       -------------------------------
2. RESIDENT AGENT: (designate resident agent and his STREET ADDRESS in Nevada
                   where process may be served).

   Name of Resident Agent:  RESIDENT AGENTS OF NEVADA, INC.
                          ------------------------------------
   Street Address:  711 Carson Street,          Carson City NV.   89701
                  ----------------------------------------------------------
                 Street No., Street Name              City         Zip
3. SHARES: (number of shares the corporation is authorized to issue)

   Number of shares with par value:  50,000,000    Par value:  0.001
                                -------------                ---------
   Number of shares without par value:  -
                                      -----
4. GOVERNING BOARD: shall be styled as (check one) xxx  Directors     Trustees
                                                   -----         -----
   Names, Addresses, Number of Board of Directors/Trustees:

   The FIRST BOARD OF DIRECTORS shall consist of 1 members and the names and
   addresses are as follows (attach additional pages if necessary)

5. PURPOSE:  The purpose of the corporation shall be:

                           Any Legal
   ------------------------------------

6. OTHER MATTERS:  Number of additional pages attached:  0
                                                       -----
7. NAMES, ADDRESSES AND SIGNATURES OF INCORPORATORS:

   DAVID A. MILLER                4004 Sunnyside Rd.  Sandpoint, ID 83864
   ---------------------          -------------------------------------------
   Name                           Address

   /s/David A. Miller
   ---------------------

8. CERTIFICATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT OF RESIDENT AGENT:

   I, Resident Agents of Nevada, Inc. Hereby accept appointment as Resident
   Agent for the above named corporation.

   /s/Diane E. Kalenowski              8-30-00
   ---------------------------        ---------
   Signature of Resident Agent          Date
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.2


Description of Agreement between Kishore Ponnavolu and MetLife, Inc. dated April 23, 2019
In December 2019, MetLife, Inc. asked Kishore Ponnavolu, its President, Asia, to travel from the U.S. to Japan on short notice to cover urgent business matters, including meetings with regulators.  Mr. Ponnavolu’s family joined him in Asia for this period.  On April 23, 2019 MetLife, Inc. agreed to reimburse Mr. Ponnavolu for his family travel expenses on this trip, at an incremental cost of approximately U.S. $75,000.  MetLife, Inc. will not make Mr. Ponnavolu whole for any of his taxes on this item.
EXHIBIT 28.1
                                       ------------ 
                           ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE
                                UCFC FUNDING CORPORATION
                    MANUFACTURED HOUSING PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                     SERIES 1997-1               
                                
 
    In accordance with Section 3.11 of that certain Pooling and
 Servicing Agreement relating to UCFC Funding Corporation
 Manufactured Housing Pass-Through Certificates Series 1997-1, 
 dated as of March 1, 1997 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"),
 by and among UCFC Funding Corporation, as depositor, United Companies 
 Lending Corporation, as servicer (the "Servicer"), and The First 
 National Bank of Chicago, as trustee, the undersigned officer
 of the Servicer does hereby certify as follows: (i) a review of
 the activities of the Servicer during 1997 and of performance
 under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under the
 undersigned officer's supervision; and (ii) to the best of such
 undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, the
 Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling
 and Servicing Agreement for 1997.
 
    EXECUTED this 26th day of March, 1998. 
 
 
                                                                 
                        /s/ C. GERON HARGON
                        -------------------------------
                            C. Geron Hargon
                            President
                            United Companies Lending Corporation
     
                          PAGE 7
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 7

- 00 301

- C R



### ____________________

JOHN LLOYD FRAZER II

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________________ _______________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 258th District Court

Polk County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 24926

________________________________________ ________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

John Lloyd Frazer II has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.2. A request to dismiss the appeal is signed by appellant personally and joined

by counsel of record. No opinion has issued in this appeal. The motion is granted,

and the appeal is therefore dismissed.2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON

Justice

Submitted on February 27, 2018

Opinion Delivered February 28 , 2018

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 97-30932

_______________________

ITOCHU INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WESTERN AVENIER MV, ET AL.

Defendants,

WESTERN BULK SHIPPING A/S; WESTERN BULK CARRIERS K/S,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court
For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-2513-K)

_________________________________________________ August 7, 1998

Before WISDOM, WIENER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-appellant Itochu International, Inc. appeals from

the district court’s ruling that defendants-appellees, as owner and

operator of the vessel in question, are entitled to protection

under the §1304(2)(q) exception of the Carriage of Goods By Sea Act1 45 F.3d 941 (5th Cir. 1995).

(COGSA) to their general COGSA duty to load and stow cargo

p roperly. In so holding the court relied in large part on our

opinion in Tubacex, Inc. v. M/V Risan

. 1 After concluding that

Itochu had proved its prima facie case, the district court found

that Itochu had controlled the loading process of the cargo in

question under an exclusive Charter Party with Western Bulk, so

that the damage to the steel cargo in question resulted without the

fault or privity of Western Bulk.

We have carefully reviewed the operable facts as reflected by

the record and the legal arguments as advanced by able counsel in

their appellate briefs and orally before the Court, as a result of

which we conclude that the judgment of the district court should be

affirmed, essentially for the reasons advanced by that court.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. ss.1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely  for the purposes of complying with, and the extent required by 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned  certifies,  in  his  capacity  as  the  Chief  Financial Officer of
Integral  Technologies,  Inc.,  that, to his knowledge, the annual report of the
company  on  Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, fully complies with
the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934  and  that  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the company's financial condition and results of operations.


October 12, 2005


/s/  William A. Ince
---------------------------------------------
William A. Ince, Chief Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Michael Matvieshen; Chief Executive Officer of Salamon
Group, Inc. (the Registrant), do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-l4(b) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:

|(1) | the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
      Registrant for the three month period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report),
      to which this statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Registrant.                                                                                                                                                            

|Dated: May 12, 2011 | By: | /s/ Michael
      Matvieshen
|------------------- | --- | ----------------------------
|                    |     | Michael Matvieshen          
|                    |     | Chief Executive Officer     
|                    |     | Principal Accounting Officer

F-18

---
STATE of North Carolina v. Tahashi Tarine MATTHEWS.

No. 538P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Tahashi Tarine Matthews, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of October 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
IN RE J.D.

No. COA04-1253

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Sampson (03J87).

Case without published opinion. Vacated and remanded for additional findings of fact.
Tally EDDINGS, M.D. v. SOUTHERN ORTHOPAEDIC AND MUSCULOSKELETAL ASSOCIATES, P.A.

No. 59P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

E. Glenn Kelly, Asheville, for Tally Eddings, M.D.

*411T. Douglas Wilson, Asheville, for Orthopaedic Asso.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 24th day of January 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

"Dismissed ex mero motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 24th day of January 2005 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. LaVern H. HARTL.

No. 14877.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Aug. 18, 1953.

Joseph T. Votava, U. S. Atty., and John E. Deming, Asst. U. S. Atty., Omaha, Neb., for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from District Court dismissed, on motion of appellant.
----

----

I Acts whose publication is obligatory

----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1936/2004

of 9 November 2004         

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 of 21 December 1994 on detailed rules for the application of the import arrangements for fruit and vegetables (1), and in particular Article 4(1) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 3223/94 shall be fixed as indicated in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 10 November 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 November 2004.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Agriculture Director-General

----

(1)OJ L 337, 24.12.1994, p. 66. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1947/2002 (OJ L 299, 1.11.2002, p. 17).

----

ANNEX

to Commission Regulation of 9 November 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

----

(1)  Country nomenclature as fixed by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2081/2003 (OJ L 313, 28.11.2003, p. 11). Code ‘            999            ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

----

----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1937/2004

of 9 November 2004         

amending Annexes I, II, III and IV to Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1), and in particular Article 74 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 is amended as follows:

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 November 2004.

For the Commission

António VITORINO            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by the 2003 Act of Accession.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-2000
<CASH>                                      13,043,625
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,144,795
<ALLOWANCES>                                   251,287
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,132,713
<PP&E>                                       2,272,266
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,203,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              58,518,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,553,191
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,645
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,349,384
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                58,518,947
<SALES>                                     19,571,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,571,807
<CGS>                                        9,890,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,890,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                93,240
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             421,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,205,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (425,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,630,824
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,630,824
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08


</TABLE>