alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5005 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5005

       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Flumioxasin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2008

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Flumioxasin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FLUMIOXASIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.69 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
FINAL P ROGRAMMATIC E N VI R O N M E N TA L I M PA C T S TAT E M E N T

(PEIS) FOR S U RV E Y I N G AND M A PP IN G P R O J EC T S IN U.S.

WAT E R S FOR C O A S TA L AND M A R I N E D ATA A C Q U IS I T I O N

SEA TURTLES 

▪ There are six species of sea turtles present throughout U.S. coastal and marine waters: loggerhead,

green, hawksbill, Kemp’s ridley, olive ridley, and leatherback.

▪ All sea turtles in U.S. waters are protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Final PEIS

considers potential impacts to sea turtles, their prey, and their habitat including areas designated as

critical habitat under the ESA. 

Sea turtles are air-breathing reptiles that are primarily aquatic 

and come ashore only to lay eggs. Hatchlings immediately 

enter the sea and migrate to the open ocean with most 

returning to coastal zones later in life. 

Sea turtles are migratory and occur in all 

regions identified in the Final PEIS,

although they have a limited range in the 

Alaska Region where they are only rarely 

sighted. The Pacific Islands Region 

contains the greatest number of sea turtle 

species, while the Greater Atlantic and 

Southeast Regions contain the most 

designated critical habitat areas.

Green Sea Turtle Hatchlings 

Hawksbill Sea Turtle 

Environmental 

Consequences 

from NOS 

Activities 

NOS activities that could impact sea turtles 

▪ Vessel presence and movement

▪ Vessel wakes

▪ Underwater activities

▪ Onshore activities

The sound produced by active underwater acoustic sources would be at frequencies well above sea turtle 

hearing range; therefore, it would be unlikely to cause injury, hearing threshold shifts, auditory masking, or 

behavioral changes. The overall impact of the Proposed Action on sea turtles and their habitat, including 

designated critical habitat, would be adverse, minor, and insignificant. 

Photo Credits: NOAA Photo Library oceanservice.noaa.gov/about/environmental-compliance/surveying-mapping.html
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     I, Charles D. Hamm, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of ProCenturyCorporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) amendment no. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A ofthe Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 which thiscertification accompanies fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and
(2) the information contained in amendment no. 1 to thequarterly report on Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
/s/ Charles D. Hamm
Wendy WHITT v. HARRIS TEETER, INC. and Randy Shultz.

No. 416A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 1, 2005.

*532Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 165 N.C.App. 32, 598 S.E.2d 151 (2004), reversing a judgment entered upon a directed verdict on 2 April 2002 by Judge Sanford L. Steelman, Jr. in Superior Court, Forsyth County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 May 2005.

Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy and Kennedy, L.L.P., by Harvey L. Kennedy, Harold L. Kennedy, III, and Annie Brown Kennedy, Winston-Salem, for plaintiff-appellee.

Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, by Lucretia D. Guia, Winston-Salem, and J. Mark Sampson, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant Harris Teeter, Inc.

Patterson Harkavy, L.L.P., by Burton Craige, Raleigh, for North Carolina Association of Women Attorneys, North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, Southern States Police Benevolent Association, Inc., North Carolina Police Benevolent Association, Inc., and North Carolina Association of Educators; Suzanne Reynolds, Winston_Salem, for North Carolina Association of Women Attorneys, and Charles E. Daye, Chapel, for North Carolina Academy of Trial Lawyers, amici curiae.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of GNC Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 5, 2005
    /s/Curtis J. LarrimerCurtis J. LarrimerChief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Troy Giles GADDY.

No. 582P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Troy Giles Gaddy, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kenneth W. Honeycutt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***377*****ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 16th day of November 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Union County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."
IN RE J.N.

No. COA04-1017

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 3, 2005.

Certification Date May 23, 2005.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (99J344).

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
STATE of North Carolina v. Zachary David GRIMES.

No. 121P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

Zachary David Grimes, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 24th day of February 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Guilford County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2005."
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.24

                            [LETTERHEAD OF PROSOFT]

                                PROMISSORY NOTE
                              Dated June 18, 1998

    
    FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Uday Pabrai ("Pabrai") an individual, 
promises to pay to the order of Prosoft I-Net Solutions, Inc. ("Prosoft"), a 
Nevada corporation, the sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000) plus 
interest thereon at the rate of 12% per annum or other maximum rate allowed by 
law, whichever is less, on the unpaid balance.

     The entire sum of principal and accrued interest shall be fully payable
upon demand, (but no later than May 30, 1999) the termination of Uday Pabrai
from the employment with ProSoft I-Net Solutions, Inc., or the final payment by
Prosoft to Pabrai for his ownership in ICII.

     Pabrai agrees that Prosoft may maintain restrictions on his Prosoft I-Net 
Solutions, Inc. stock until this loan is paid in full.  In addition, Pabrai 
puts forth the Prosoft I-Net Solutions, Inc. stock as collateral to guarantee 
this loan.

     In the event of default, the undersigned borrower agrees to pay all 
reasonable attorney's fees and costs of collection and to submit any dispute to 
binding arbitration before JAMS ("Judicial Arbitration Mediation Services") in
Orange County, California.

     Signed and effective June 18, 1998


Uday Pabrai
1861 Gregory Street
Aurora, IL 60504


By:  /s/ UDAY PABRAI
     ---------------
     Uday Pabrai
EATMON v. TOWN OF BAILEY et al.

No. 653P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 1, 2004.

Scott C. Hart, New Bern, for Town of Bailey.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of March 2004 by Plaintiff to Rehear Denial En Banc (Reconsideration Motion From Denial on Appeal of North Carolina Court of Appeals):

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 1st day of April 2004."
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  115,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    66,271
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               458,904
<PP&E>                                         3,698,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,138,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,406,083
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          658,750
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,205,269
<OTHER-SE>                                     (807,577)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,138,678
<SALES>                                        14,092,182
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               14,092,182
<CGS>                                          12,184,518
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  13,946,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             54,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                153,978
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (164,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            318,878
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   318,878
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.05
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Henry A. Miller,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ofIdaho General Mines, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial conditionand results of operations of Idaho General Mines, Inc.

Dated: November20, 2006
|        | By:    | /s/   Henry A. Miller |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Name:  | Henry A. Miller                      |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer              |
|   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)        |

 

----
STATE of North Carolina v. Sidney EDDIE.

No. 238P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

Sidney Eddie, Pro Se.

Joan M. Cunningham, Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth W. Honeycutt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 16th day of March 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2005."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the form 10-K filed as of December 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001018380
<NAME> EMERALD ISLE BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,521
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          11,680
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     30,761
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          83,512
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            81,522
<LOANS>                                        265,832
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (2,623)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 409,639
<DEPOSITS>                                     337,090
<SHORT-TERM>                                    11,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,944
<LONG-TERM>                                     30,688
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,211
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 409,639
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,771
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,623
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   389
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,783
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,243
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,737
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,046
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,211
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (39)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,826
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,381
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,381
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.33
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,058
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,542
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,298
<RECOVERIES>                                       168
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,263
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,211
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            432
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-20715

Summary Calendar

TECNA PERU, S.A.C., 

 Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

UNISERT MULTIWALL SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED; KENNETH 

TIERLING, 

 Defendants - Appellants

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CV-773

Before DAVIS, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Unisert Multiwall Systems, Inc. and Kenneth Tierling appeal the district 

court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The arbitration clause at 

issue is contained in a Contract of Cession. The clause states: 

The possible differences in the interpretation of the present 

CONTRACT OF CESSION that could be arise between the 

ASSIGNOR and the ASSIGNEE will be resolved as much as 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 10, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-20715 Document: 00513188298 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/10/2015
No. 14-20715

2

possible by agreement between the parties or otherwise by the 

norms of the Civil code and other effective disposition. In case any 

discrepancies may remain, these will be subjected to arbitration so 

that they are solved by Arbitration Court made up of three 

members.

This suit, however, alleges breach of a different contract, an Agency 

Agreement, signed by the same parties. On de novo review, American Bankers 

Ins. Co. of Fla. v. Inman, 436 F.3d 490, 492 (5th Cir. 2006), we agree with the 

district court that the Contract of Cession’s arbitration clause is limited to 

disputes regarding the interpretation and performance of that contract. It does 

not govern disputes arising from the Agency Agreement. For this reason and 

those stated by the district court, we AFFIRM.

 Case: 14-20715 Document: 00513188298 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/10/2015
STATE of North Carolina v. John Lucky ADAMS.

No. 196P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

John Lucky Adams, Pro Se.

Martin T. McCracken, Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth W. Honeycutt, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 8th day of April 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Christopher P. Kiritsy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Christopher P. KiritsyChristopher P. Kiritsy
Chief Financial Officer
March 15, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Kos
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.