alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**SECTION      906 CERTIFICATION**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               | FIRST              METROPLEX CAPITAL, INC. |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                               |                                       |   |
|                               |                                       |   |
| Dated:                May 19, 2006 | By:                                        | /s/                Patrick G. Adams |
|                               |                                       | Patrick                G. Adams |
|                               |                                       | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                               |                                       |   |
|                               |                                       |   |
| Dated:                May 19, 2006 | By:                                        | /s/                Sue Higgs |
|                               |                                       | Sue                Higgs |
|                               |                                       | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
HomeNewsCaribbean Mapping Expedition

# #ScienceAtSea

# Gallery: Views from the Seafloor

Here are some choice photos captured by a remotely operated vehicle during NOS's 2015 Caribbean seafloor mapping mission onboard the NOAA ship *Nancy Foster*.

### Photos:

A cluster of what appear to be tiny amphipods  scavenge in the remnants of a sea urchin’s skeleton at the base of a reef in the U.S. Virgin Islands. 

A  close-up of brain coral captured by remotely operated vehicle. Scientists use the ROV to confirm the type of seafloor cover—from sandy bottom to hard coral—previously identified using sonar and geographic information system tools. 

 A sea cucumber on a sandy bottom off the south coast of St. Croix in the U.S. Virgin Islands. NOAA scientists have been exploring and mapping the seafloor in this region for the past twelve years.

A coney, in its bicolor phase, investigates the camera as the remotely operated vehicle makes a pass over its reef. Exploration with the ROV on these Caribbean reefs helps locate fish and build an understanding of the habitat preferences of different species.

A small mound of coral nestled amongst coralline algae and sponges on a reef in the U.S. Virgin Islands. Seafloor mapping with sonar combined with imagery from the ROV reveal both the extent and health of these reefs, which serve as prime habitat for economically important fish.

Learn More About This Mission

###### More **Information**

          - ** Flickr Images
          - ROV or AUV...what's the difference?
          - National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
          - NCCOS Ocean Science Blog
          - Coral Reef Conservation Program 
          - NOAA National Geophysical Data Center's Online Water Column Sonar Data viewer 

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6758

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus STEVEN JOHNSON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:95-0488) Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 28, 2006 Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Claude Jendron, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Steven Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Johnson’s notice of appeal and informal brief as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims- 3 - based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence, not previously discoverable by due diligence, that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Johnson’s claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Export-Import Bank of the United States

# AGENCY:

Export-Import Bank.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Charter of the Export-Import Bank of the United States, this notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of the United States has received an application for a $525 million long-term loan guarantee to support the export of approximately $366 million worth of U.S. engineering services, design services, licenses, catalysts, and refining equipment. The U.S. goods and services will be exported to Malaysia and establish production capacity of refined petrochemicals. New capacity from the project is anticipated to produce 718 thousand metric tons per year of jet fuel, 961 thousand metric tons per year of light naphtha, 460 thousand metric tons per year of low sulfur fuel oil, 1.68 million metric tons per year of paraxylene, and 591 thousand metric tons per year of benzene. Production of paraxylene and benzene will primarily be sold to China, while production of jet fuel, light naphtha, low sulfur fuel oil will primarily be sold regionally in Southeast Asia.

# DATES:

                        Comments are due 14 days from publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# ADDRESSES:

                        Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction electronically on                         *www.regulations.gov,*                         or by email to                         *economic.impact@exim.gov.*

Eric Larger,

Office of Policy Analysis and International Relations.

[FR Doc. 2022-13827 Filed 6-28-22; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Stanley Lapidus, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HelicosBioSciences Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructionscontained in SEC Release 34-47986] ;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
| Date: August 8, 2007                   |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| /s/ Stanley N.  Lapidus                |   |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| *(Principal  Executive Officer)*       |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Riviera Tool Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Kenneth K.
Rieth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Peter Canepa, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.

Dated: December 27, 2004

By: /s/ Kenneth K. Rieth
        -----------------------
        Kenneth K. Rieth
        Chief Executive Officer

Dated:   December 27, 2004

By: /s/ Peter Canepa
    ----------------------------
         Peter Canepa
         Chief Financial Officer
Presidential Documents

37971 

Federal Register 

Vol. 87, No. 121 

Friday, June 24, 2022 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of June 21, 2022 

Prescription of Method of Designating a Member of the Military Sentencing Parameters and Criteria Board 

Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 539E(e)(4)(B) of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022, Public Law 

117–81, 135 Stat. 1541, 1700 (2021), I hereby order as follows: 

(1) If the chief trial judges designated under article 26(g) of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 826(g), do not include a trial judge 

of the Navy, then the Judge Advocate General of the Navy shall designate 

as a voting member of the Military Sentencing Parameters and Criteria 

Board (Board) either the Chief Judge of the Department of the Navy or 

a Navy trial judge assigned to the Navy and Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. 

(2) If the chief trial judges designated under article 26(g) of the Uniform 

Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 826(g), do not include a trial judge 

of the Marine Corps, then the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant 

of the Marine Corps, in consultation with the Judge Advocate General of 

the Navy, shall designate as a voting member of the Board a Marine Corps 

trial judge assigned to the Navy and Marine Corps Trial Judiciary. 

This memorandum constitutes the regulations provided for in subsections 

(ii) and (iii) of section 539E(e)(4)(B) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2022. 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PREZ DOC 1
37972 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 121 / Friday, June 24, 2022 / Presidential Documents 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, June 21, 2022 

[FR Doc. 2022–13719 

Filed 6–23–22; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 5001–06–P 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with PREZ DOC 1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
#### Alfred *R.*BACHRACH, Peti*tioner, v.*COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 248, Docket 22634.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 14, 1953.

Decided June 23, 1953.

H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack and Louise Foster, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Alan Demar, New York City, for petitioner.

Before CHASE, CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The decision of the Tax Court is affirmed on the opinion below, 18 T.C. 479, and Commissioner v. Smith, 2 Cir., 203 F.2d 310; Cohen v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 148 F.2d 336; Janeway v. Commissioner, 2 Cir., 147 F.2d 602.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**INFRASOURCE SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, David R. Helwig, certify that:

 

1.               Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of InfraSource Services, Inc.;

 

2.               Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the

 

registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirector (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 13, 2004            |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
| /s/ David R. Helwig                   |   |
| David R. Helwig                       |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.



|                     |  |  |  |                                         |  |                                                               
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |  |  | BANK OF THE JAMES FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By                                      |  | /s/ Robert R. Chapman III                                     
|                     |  |  |  |                                         |  | Robert R. Chapman III, President                              
|                     |  |  |  |                                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                                 
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: August 9, 2007 |  |  |  | By                                      |  | /s/ J. Todd Scruggs                                           
|                     |  |  |  |                                         |  | J. Todd Scruggs, Secretary and Treasurer                      
|                     |  |  |  |                                         |  | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)