alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Facts
3. How much water is in the ocean?

**How much water is in the ocean?**  About **97 percent** of Earth's water is in the ocean. sunset viewed from Kure Atoll, located near Midway Atoll in the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands*The ocean covers more than 70 percent of the surface of our planet.* It's hard to imagine, but about 97 percent of the Earth's water can be found in our ocean. Of the tiny percentage that's not in the ocean, about two percent is frozen up in glaciers and ice caps. Less than one percent of all the water on Earth is fresh. A tiny fraction of water exists as water vapor in our atmosphere. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, there are over 1,386,000,000 cubic kilometers (332,519,000 cubic miles) of water on the planet. A cubic mile is the volume of a cube measuring one mile on each side. Of this vast volume of water, NOAA's National Geophysical Data Center estimates that 1,335,000,000 cubic kilometers (321,003,271 cubic miles) is in the ocean. That's enough water to fill about 352,670,000,000,000,000,000 gallon-sized milk containers!
 More **Information** NOAA's National Centers for Environmental Information What is hydrography? Tides and Currents   Get **Social** Social
  **Last updated:** 06/05/23 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6184

LEONARD CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; RICHARD A. YOUNG,

Regional Administrator; A. D. ROBINSON, Warden; M. L. HILL, Operation Warden; KERN R.

GILLIAM, Business Manager; VIKI STOKES; LYNN

KISER SAMFORD, Accountants Department of

Nottoway Corrections Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-747)

Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leonard Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Leonard Carter appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his complaint filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Carter’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See Carter v. Virginia, No. CA-97-747 (E.D.

Va. Feb. 17, 1998). We also deny Carter’s motion for execution.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ALAN FOWLER, §

§ No. 683, 2013

Defendant Below, §

Appellant, § Court Below:

§

v. § Superior Court of the

§ State of Delaware, in and for

STATE OF DELAWARE, § New Castle County

§

P laintiff Below, § Cr. I.D. No s. 1108000561A;

Appellee. § and 1108000561B

Submitted: January 21, 2015

Decided: January 22 , 2015

Before STRINE Chief Justice

, RIDGELY , and VALIHURA , Justices.

O R D E R

This 22 nd day of January 2015

, the Court, having considered this matter on

the briefs and arguments of the parties

, and the record below

, concludes that the

same should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the

Superior Court in its Order dated February 6, 2012.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the

Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
Lewis Earl WILLIAMS v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 483P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 2, 2004.

Lewis E. Williams, Pro Se.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, William Graham, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 14th day of September 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Halifax County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of December 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 14th day of September 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 2nd day of December 2004."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GOSS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              49
<SECURITIES>                                         1
<RECEIVABLES>                                      191
<ALLOWANCES>                                        16
<INVENTORY>                                        227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   399
<PP&E>                                             244
<DEPRECIATION>                                      24
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              428
<BONDS>                                            351
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       907
<SALES>                                            633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   633
<CGS>                                              497
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      544
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    86
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (36)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (37)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (5)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (42)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Marvin Earl KING v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 618P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Marvin Earl King, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Mitchell D. Norton, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th day of December 2004 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."
2003 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan for Randall Reynoso



  
 EXHIBIT 10.25

  
 PLACER SIERRA BANK 
 2003 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan 
  

			
	Participant:	  	Randall Reynoso
	Title:	  	Executive Vice President/Chief Operating Officer
	Award Potential:	  	0% to 45% of base compensation

  
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES

  

	 	1.	Reduce bank turnover by 25% 

  

	 	2.	Develop process to review all branches, at least annually, capable of justifying branch location, staffing, market share and profitability goals 

  

	 	3.	Produce $423 million in new loan commitments consistent with 2003 lending plan 

  

	 	4.	Produce $980 thousand in annual Zions and other loan broker fees 

  

	 	5.	Select and install MCIF system and profitability model capable of determining customer and product profitability 

  

	 	6.	Implement 2003 CRA program and fulfill 2003 goals 

  
 Individual Portion 10% 
  
 BANK PERFORMANCE MEASURES BASED ON 2003 CASH EARNINGS 
  

															
	 Bank Cash Earnings

	  	Individual
Portion

	 	 	Bonus for
Individual
Portion

	 	 	Bank
Earnings
Portion

	 	 	Total
Award

	 
	 Threshold
	  	 $12.0 million
	  	10	%	 	+   0	%	 	+ 15	%	 	= 25	%
	 Target
	  	 $12.9 million
	  	10	%	 	+ 10	%	 	+ 20	%	 	= 40	%
	 Outstanding
	  	 $13.5 million
	  	10	%	 	+ 10	%	 	+ 25	%	 	= 45	%

  
 GENERAL GUIDELINES 

 

	1.	All individual goals stated above must be achieved to receive the minimum award of 10% 

  

	2.	If all individual goals stated above are achieved but the Bank threshold is not met, the individual will still receive the minimum award of 10% 

  

	3.	All individual goals stated above must be achieved in order to qualify to receive Bank awards plus additional bonuses for individual achievement, as appropriate


  

	4.	Cash earnings levels are inclusive of the payment of bonuses
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

HOnorable L. A. :'ooZs 

State Superintendent 

Department of Education 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Februssy 17, 1939 

in aanea seesh3n, ana belp t~foat 88C%thWI Of '1%X&a from the 

iat.ana e~Me& ssme to two Other 

e0rmn0n~e &a the county Boar& Of 

Scurry County have the autI%wity to qetaeh mid territory after the election for sOiwi0iiastion htta been held, 

anti before the new distrfct had been declared by the 

CorHnissioners* Caurt?* 
iion. 1. A. 'ioods, yabruary 19, 193Q; Pegs 2 

In raply - _ thereto. thie Is to advise that're have lnvostigete6 tP.ie a6se from the facta givea to us as disaloeed by 

the coxamications a:-& other written mtter in au= f:le in cnneotloa xfth t:Zis rw~est, a:.< **e ax 31 tLe opinion t!iat tiie 

~uprez~e Zmrt of IJX~.B has definitely answerer: tke c,ueetion 

la the case of Ltate v. kkksr, 40 S. Vi. (26) 41, uhereln the 

court stated: 

*It is mar opinion that, even if It be c.onoeded 

that the orOer8 of the uountp bwx-6 with reference 

to the tmrltory of district ?Io. 16 wxld have beem 

In all respects leeal 1s the nbssaqe of the penCing 

rleatioa, still the rlgPt of the people to vote on 

incoorporat;ion, hftViAg been flat lawfully ilfvoked, 

would not be,Interfemd olth or defeated by the 

oonnty board pending the ,.holdln@ of the deation, aad 

the deelaratiozr of Ita roiult. Thir ie certainly the 

uarreot rule, even ff it Do aotmedad that the power 

~of~~thoie' COwaT Iward 6nd th6 right af tha psopre wora 

uu-~rdi~6to or equ6Lg 

Toura vary trlaly 

OFl!%xAs 

oso. 5. &rrry 

Am3i8taab 

(WB;%
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commerce Energy Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q/A (Amendment No. 1) for the quarterly period ending January 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Peter Weigand, President
(principal executive officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: June 14, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ PETER WEIGANDPETER WEIGANDPresident(Principal Executive Officer)
STATE v. NGUYEN.

No. COA04-538.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 21, 2005.

Certification Date July 11, 2005.

Appeal from the Cumberland (02CRS58218).

Case without published opinion. No prejudicial error.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.6
EXECUTION COPY



FIRST AMENDMENT 
TO
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
May 31, 2019
Whereas, Watford Holdings Ltd., a Bermuda corporation (the “Company”), and Laurence B. Richardson, II (the “Executive”) entered into an employment agreement dated November 30, 2018 (the “Employment Agreement”);
Whereas, Section 12.02 of the Employment Agreement provides that the Company and the Executive may amend the Employment Agreement by written agreement executed and delivered to each party; 
Whereas, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement as permitted by Section 12.02 thereof;
NOW THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive hereby amend the Employment Agreement as provided herein.
1.    Section 12.09 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end of such Section 12.09: 
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, all payments or benefits that are due after December 31 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which such payment or benefit vests for purposes of Section 457A of the Code, shall be made or provided on such December 31.    
2.    Except as amended herein, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without modification. 
3.     The provisions of this First Amendment to the Employment Agreement may be amended or waived only by a written agreement executed and delivered by the Company and the Executive. No other course of dealing between the parties to this First Amendment to the Employment Agreement or any delay in exercising any rights hereunder will operate as a waiver of any rights of any such parties.
4.    This First Amendment to the Employment Agreement may be executed simultaneously in two counterparts, any one of which need not contain the signatures of more than one party, but all of which counterparts taken together will constitute one and the same agreement. 
6.    ALL QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE CONSTRUCTION, VALIDITY AND INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE GOVERNED BY THE INTERNAL LAW OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS. 
7.    The parties agree to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of the federal and state courts situated in New York County, New York, for the resolution of any dispute arising under this Agreement or under any share-based award agreements between the Company and the Executive. 


-1-





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to the Employment Agreement as of the date and year first above written.
	
		
	WATFORD HOLDINGS LTD.

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ John Rathgeber

	 
	Name: John Rathgeber

	 
	Title: Chief Executive Officer

	 
	 

	EXECUTIVE

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Laurence B. Richardson, II

	 
	Name: Laurence B. Richardson, II








-2-
STATE v. COBB.

No. COA04-508.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Guilford (02CRS23421, 02CRS23422, 02CRS23423, 02CRS23424, 02CRS23425, 02CRS23426)

Case reported without published opinion No error in part; remanded for resentencing.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-19477) pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan of Prosoft I-Net
Solutions, Inc. (formerly known as Prosoft Development, Inc.) of our report
dated October 24, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Prosoft I-Net Solutions, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended July 31, 1998.

Orange County, California
November __, 1998
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO TITLE 18,


UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Michael C. Greiner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ANGIODYNAMICS, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:


1.the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 2017 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: July 25, 2017





/ s / Michael C. GreinerMichael C. Greiner, Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
------------


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Monaco Group Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Suzanne Lilly, Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Suzanne Lilly
------------------------------------------
Suzanne Lilly
Chief Financial Officer

August 19, 2004
Exhibit 10.13


 


Desert Hawk Gold Corp.


 


1290 Holcomb Ave


Reno Nevada 89502


Ph 775-322-4621


Fax 775-322-6867


 


March 26, 2019


 


Dear Rick,


 


Thank you for the informative property tour. It was
great to see you and Stu again and I enjoyed talking with Howard.


 


Our agreement is as follows:


 


1. Desert Hawk Gold Corporation
is granted an option to purchase the patented mining claims listed in Exhibit A attached for $500,000 USD, cash payable on or before
on or before June 15, 2019; and


 


2. Ben Julian LLC will sign a quitclaim deed conveying
whatever title Ben Julian, LLC has to said patented claims to Desert Hawk Gold Corporation. Desert Hawk will prepare and tender
a Utah statutory quitclaim deed. Desert Hawk Gold Corporation may choose to designate a person or entity other than Desert Hawk
Gold Corporation to take title in the quitclaim deed, subject to Ben Julian, LLCs right to approve said person or entity.; Ben
Julian, LLC is not concerned about the identity of the grantee, except to satisfy itself that the guarantee may lawfully take title;
and


 


3. Desert Hawk Gold is purchasing said patented claims
based upon the title report and 9 attachments prepared by Intermountain Land Services, LLC for Desert Hawk Gold dated April 30,
2019. A copy of this report is attached as Exhibit B. Desert Hawk gold is aware of the retained royalties listed in the
report and the alleged errors in the county deeds and accepts the property subject to those title issues; and


 


4. Ben Julian, LLC has not made and will not transfer
any interest or enter any conflicting agreement since April 30, 2019, which would affect the patented claims listed in Exhibit
A while the purchase option is in effect; and


 


5. Ben Julian, LLC has made no
representations regarding its title to the mining claims beyond those listed in the Intermountain Land Services, LLC report; and


 


6. Desert Hawk Gold Corporation
is making this purchase based upon its own opinions as to the status of Ben Julian, LLC’s title to the property.; and


 


7. Real Property taxes will be prorated
from the closing date; and


 






     


     


    

 





Desert Hawk Gold Corp.


 


1290
Holcomb Ave


Reno Nevada 89502


Ph 775-322-4621


Fax 775-322-6867


 


8. After the closing Ben Julian, LLC will make a good
faith effort to obtain Newmont’s consent to release its data from its recent exploration activities on the property to desert Hawk
Gold Corporation.


 


Please tender the deed and I will give you wire transfer
instructions for the funds. Ben Julian, LLC will Express Mail the signed quitclaim deed to you when it receives the $500,000. If
you wish you can set up an escrow to handle the transaction at your expense. Please sign and return a copy of this email indicating
Desert Hawk Gold Corporation’s agreement to its terms. Similarly, if you want any changes made let me know.


 


	Ben Julian, LLC	 
	 	 
	By 	/s/ Benjamin R. Simpson	 
	Benjamin R. Simpson, Manager	 
	 	 
	Desert Hawk Gold Corporation	 
	 	 
	By	 /s/ Rick Havenstrite 	 
	Rick Havenstrite, President
Modeling Marine Ecosystems With Virtual Reality:

Ocean Food Web Module Worksheet #1

Research an Organism

Organism

Size

What it eats

Predators

Interesting

Information

NOAA’s “Find a Species” web site (www.fisheries.noaa.gov/find-species) is

one good source of information about marine organisms. However, feel free

to use information from any reliable source to fill in the table.

U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
IN RE B.N.

No. COA04-531.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 19, 2005.

Certification Date May 9, 2005.

Appeal from Harnett (02J23, 02J24, 02J25, 02J26, 02J27).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.