alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Jay D. Nielsen, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company, LLC.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.



|                     |  |     |  |                                       
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: April 13, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ JAY D. NIELSEN                    
|                     |  |     |  | Jay D. Nielsen Chief Financial Officer
Jimcy MCGIRT, Petitioner v. OKLAHOMA

No. 18-9526

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Motion for appointment of counsel granted, and Ian H. Gershengorn, Esq., of Washington, D.C., is appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of Money4Gold Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Douglas Feirstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Douglas Feirstein                                                  
|Douglas Feirstein
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)



Dated: August 19, 2009





In connection with the quarterly report of Money4Gold Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Daniel Brauser, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



1.

The quarterly report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and



2.

The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Daniel Brauser                                                  
|Daniel Brauser
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)



Dated: August 19, 2009
#### ISBRANDTSEN COMPANY, Inc., as demise charterer of the S. S. John Miller on behalf of itself and all other parties in interest, Libellant-Appellee, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, United States Fire Insurance Company, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Home Insurance Company, Queen Insurance Company of America, Firemen’s Insurance Company, Insurance Company of North America, Globe & Rutgers Insurance Company, Firemen’s Fund Insurance Company, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Aetna Insurance Company and Centennial Insurance Company, Respondents-Appellants. THE JOHN MILLER.

No. 244, Docket 22644.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 5, 1953.

Decided June 1, 1953.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, Henry N. Longley and F. Herbert Prem, New York City, of counsel, for appellants.

Lord, Day & Lord, New York City, James S. Hemingway and John W. Castles III, New York City, of counsel, for appel-lee.

Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed on opinion below. 113 F.Supp. 357.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Report), of MoneyGram International, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof I, W. Alexander Holmes, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2012 |  | /s/ W. ALEXANDER HOLMES                             
|                     |  | W. Alexander Holmes                                 
|                     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
BEAU RIVAGE HOMEOWNERS ASS'N v. NEW HANOVER COUNTY.

No. COA04-671.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 15, 2005.

Certification Date April 4, 2005.

Appeal from the New Hanover (02CVS4389, 02CVS4628, 02CVS1422, 02CVS1423).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
In the Matter of THE PURPORTED LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF FRANCIS M. BARNES Dated November 22, 1989 and in the Matter of the Purported Last Will and Testament of Francis M. Barnes, Dated May 25, 1967.

No. 262A03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Danny D. McNally, Greenville, Emma S. Holscher, for Riley S. Corddry.

Myron T. Hill, Jr., Greenville, for Diane Graue.

Stephen A. Dunn, Raleigh, Raymond E. Dunn, Jr., New Bern, for Lucy Tull.

Marvin Blount, Jr., Greenville, Ted Mackall, Jr., Rebecca Cameron Blount, for Caveators, Beneficiaries of the 1967 Will of Francis M. Barnes.

John Walter Bryant, Eva C. Currin, Raleigh, Jeffrey A. Batts, Joseph L. Bell, Jr., Rocky Mount, Wendy P. Wilson, for Propounders of 1989 Will of Estate of Francis M. Barnes.

Gregory S. Camp, Rocky Mount, for Church of the Advent.

Charles J. Murray, Special Deputy Attorney General, for ECU Athletic Fund.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Propounder-Appellee (Propounder of 1989 Will) on the 6th day of April 2004 for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41290

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE RAMIREZ-HAREO, also known as

Jose Ilario Ramirez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-03-CR-473-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Ramirez-Hareo appeals his conviction and sentence for

being an alien unlawfully found in the United States after

deportation after having been convicted of an aggravated felony

in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b). For the first time on

appeal, Ramirez-Hareo argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is

unconstitutional on its face and as applied in his case because

it does not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated
No. 03-41290

-2-

felony conviction to be charged in the indictment and proved

beyond a reasonable doubt. 

Ramirez-Hareo acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed

by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but

he wishes to preserve the issues for Supreme Court review in

light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi

did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at

489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir.

2000). Thus, we must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until

the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit, 231

F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

Accordingly, Ramirez-Hareo’s arguments are foreclosed, and

his conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5044 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Propiconazole. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2008 

Mr. COSTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Propiconazole. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROPICONAZOLE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.80 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Propiconazole) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5044 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
IN RE: J.G.M.

No. COA03-1402

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed December 7, 2004

This case not for publication

Rowan County, No. 99 J 112.

*David B. Wilson for petitioner-appellee Rowan County Department of Social Services.*

*Nancy R. Gaines and E. Blake Evans for Guardian ad Litem-appellee.*

*Rebekah W. Davis for respondent-appellant LaWanda McDowell. Mercedes O. Chut for respondent-appellant Walter McDowell, III.*

ELMORE, Judge.

LaWanda Bellamy McDowell and Walter McDowell (respondents) appeal an order terminating parental rights to their daughter, J.G.M. As we cannot discern the basis of the trial court's order, we vacate the order and remand for the entry of an order stating specifically the grounds to support termination.

By order dated 12 July 1999, the District Court of Rowan County ajudicated J.G.M. to be an abused and neglected juvenile under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-517(1) and (21). On 20 December 2001, the Rowan County Department of Social Services (DSS) filed a motion in the cause seeking termination of the parental rights ofrespondents to J.G.M. This motion alleged that grounds existed to terminate parental rights under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111(a)(1), (2), and (3). On 11 June 2003, the court issued its order terminating the parental rights of both respondents. This order states that "Pursuant to G.S. 7B-1111, sufficient grounds exist to terminate the parental rights . . ." without specifying the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111(a) upon which it based the order.

It is the duty of the trial court to enter an order such that the appellate court can readily understand the basis of the order. *See Coble v. Coble,* 300 N.C. 708, 714, 268 S.E.2d 185, 190 (1980). It is not the role of the appellate court to "guess" the grounds upon which the trial court terminated the respondents' parental rights. When the trial court fails to state specifically the grounds to support its order, this Court should not be required to analyze each and every possible ground for termination.

Accordingly, we vacate the order and remand this matter to the trial court for the entry of a proper order, clearly stating the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-1111 which it found were the basis of the termination order. Upon remand, the trial court should, in its discretion, be allowed to receive further evidence, and make additional findings of fact. *Heath v. Heath,* 132 N.C. App. 36, 38, 509 S.E.2d 804, 805 (1999).

Vacated and remanded.

Judges CALABRIA and STEELMAN concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   Exhibit 10.24
                                                                   -------------

The following is a fair and accurate English translation of the original
contract.

                              PURCHASE AGREEMENT
                              ------------------

                                    between

                              Portmann Trading SA
                            Hongkong Bank Building
                                    Panama
                                     BUYER
                                        
                                      and

                         UTG Communications Holding AG
                                 Baarerstr. 50
                                   6300 Zug
                                    SELLER

Since the beginning of 1997 UTG Communications (Europe) AG has been active in
providing telecommunication services in Switzerland.

The Buyer purchases from the Seller 10,000 registered shares of UTG
Communications (Europe) AG, Zug for a total purchase price of SFr. 1,000.00 (one
thousand francs).

The purchase price was paid in cash by the Seller upon signing of this
agreement, which is herewith acknowledged.

The Buyer confirms that he received from the Seller all existing contracts,
balance sheets and documents or has access to them.  The Seller declares that
there are no pending court proceedings and that there are no liabilities other
than as stated on the balance sheet.

The Seller agrees to perform certain services for the Buyer on a mandate basis.

The transfer date is November 30, 1997 retroactively.

The Buyer agrees to change the name of the company no later than February 15,
1998 and to repay all outstanding loans of the Seller.


UTG Communications Holding AG                      Portman Trading AG
going forward (UTG Telecom AG)          
                                        
                                        
/s/ Ueli Ernst                                     /s/ Werner Rusterholz
------------------------------                     ------------------
U. Ernst                                           W. Rusterholz
                                        
Date: December 29, 1997                            December 29, 1997
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5076 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Mondur M Flaked. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2008 

Mr. TIM MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Mondur M Flaked. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MONDUR M FLAKED. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Mondur M Flaked (CAS No. 

101–68–8) (provided for in 

subheading 2929.10.80) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5076 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Brian Jaggard, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of YzApp International
        Inc. for the quarterly period ended January 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully
        complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of YzApp International Inc.                                                                                     

Dated: March 24, 2008

|s/s Brian
      Jaggard                                             | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Brian Jaggard                                                       | 
|President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer         | 
|and Director                                                        | 
|(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer) | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to YzApp
International Inc. and will be retained by YzApp International Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES ALPHONSO MACK

No. COA04-143

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed February 15, 2005

This case not for publication

Pender County No. 03 CRS 50336.

*Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General Kathleen U. Baldwin, for the State.*

*John T. Hall for defendant-appellant.*

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Defendant entered a guilty plea to one count of trafficking in at least twenty-eight grams but less than 200 grams of cocaine by possession, and was sentenced under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-95(h)(3)(a) (2003) to an active prison term of thirty-five to forty-two months. He filed timely notice of appeal from the judgment.

Counsel appointed to represent defendant on appeal has been unable to identify any issue with sufficient merit to support a meaningful argument for relief. He asks this Court to conduct its own review of the record for possible prejudicial error. Counsel has shown to the satisfaction of this Court that he has compliedwith the requirements of *Anders v. California,* 386 U.S. 738, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, *reh'g denied,* 388 U.S. 924, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), and *State v. Kinch,* 314 N.C. 99, 331 S.E.2d 665 (1985), by advising defendant of his right to file written arguments with this Court and providing him with the necessary documents. Although defendant has filed *pro se* arguments with this Court, the issues raised by defendant fall outside his limited right of appeal from a guilty plea under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1444(a1), (a2) and (e) (2003). Accordingly, we dismiss defendant's *pro se* claims without prejudice to his right to file a motion for appropriate relief in the trial court.

As mandated by *Anders,* we have fully examined the record to determine whether any issues of arguable merit appear therefrom and whether the appeal is wholly frivolous. We conclude the appeal is frivolous. Furthermore, we have examined the record for possible prejudicial errors and have found none.

No error.

Judges CALABRIA and LEVINSON concur.

Report per Rule 30(e).