alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOcean Facts

# What's the difference between a nautical chart and a map?

## A chart is more than a map 

Section of a NOAA Nautical Chart. 

A nautical chart represents hydrographic data, providing  very detailed information on water depths, shoreline, tide predictions,  obstructions to navigation such as rocks and shipwrecks, and navigational aids.

 The term “map,” on the other hand, emphasizes  landforms and encompasses various geographic and cartographic products. Some  examples of maps might be road maps or atlases, or city plans. A map usually  represents topographical information.

A chart is used by mariners to plot  courses through open bodies of water as well as in highly trafficked areas. Because  of its critical importance in promoting safe navigation, the nautical chart has  a certain level of legal standing and authority. A map, on the other hand, is a   reference guide showing predetermined  routes like roads and highways. 

Nautical charts provide detailed information on hidden  dangers to navigation. Maps provide no information of the condition of a road.

###### **Search** Our Facts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - Office of Coast Survey  
          - Travel the Seas:  An Animated Primer on Nautical Charts
          - Historical Charts and Maps (audio podcast)
          - Nautical Charts: A Message in a Bottle ,  NOS Education

**Last updated:**   01/20/23**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
PITTS v. NASH DAY HOSPITAL.

No. 22A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 13, 2005.

Barry S. Cobb, James T. Newman, Jr., Raleigh, for Harris, Wilson & OB-GYN Asso.

Charles S. Rountree, Tarboro, Charles Albert, for Jennifer L. Pitts.

James W. Williams, Anne W. Ford, Asheville, for North Carolina Association of Defense Attorneys.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 13th day of April 2005 by N.C. Academy of Trial Lawyers for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 13th day of April 2005."
# 073-/5 ELECTRONIC RECORD
COA # 07-13-00173-CR OFFENSE: 46.035 

### Darrell Lynn Holleman v.The State 

### STYLE: ofTexas COUNTY: Hutchinson COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED TRIAL COURT: 84th District Court DATE:12/03/14 Publish: NO TC CASE #: 10,889



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS Darrell Lynn Holleman v. The State STYLE: ofTexas CCA#: 

# 073-IS PRO SF_ FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: Petition 

### CCADisposition: DATE: 

## &£Fu<>?b JUDGE: 

# DATE: pylxzl&Oir JUDGE: tty/{yui^a^. SIGNED: PUBLISH: PC: DNP:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: ELECTRONIC RECORD
HomeOcean Facts

# Why do whales make sounds?

## Whales make noise to communicate, locate food, and find each other.

A humpback whale in the singing position.

Whales are very social creatures that travel in groups  called “pods.” They use a variety of noises to communicate and socialize with  each other. The three main types of sounds made by whales are clicks, whistles,  and pulsed calls. 

Clicks are believed to be for navigation and identifying  physical surroundings. When the sound waves bounce off of an object, they  return to the whale, allowing the whale to identify the shape of the object. Clicks  can even help to differentiate between friendly creatures and predators. Clicks  have also been observed during social interactions, suggesting they may also  have a communicative function.

Whistles and pulsed calls are used during social activities.  Pulsed calls are more frequent and sound like squeaks, screams, and squawks to  the human ear. Differing vocal “dialects” have been found to exist between  different pods within the same whale population. This is most likely so that  whales can differentiate between whales within their pods and strangers.

Whales also use their tails and fins to make loud slapping  noises on the surface of the water to communicate nonverbally. The sound can be  heard for hundreds of meters below the surface and may be a warning sign of  aggression or a tool to scare schools of fish together, making them an easier  meal.

In the Stellwagen Bank National Marine Sanctuary, NOAA scientists  attached sensors to whales in order to track their movement patterns. They hope  to learn about the whales’ behavior and communication as well as to observe how  human interaction affects their behavior.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - Killer  Whales
          - Marine  Mammal Sounds: Blue Whale

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 16

- 00023

- CV

I N THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

WILLIE BURNS AND ZANATTA BURNS

On Appeal from the 335th District Court Burleson County, Texas Trial Court No. 27,875

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Willie Burns , appellant, filed a notice of appeal in this matter on March 18 , 201 6. 1 The

clerk’s record in this matter, which was due to be filed on or before May 19, 2016

, has not been

filed, and there is no indication that Burns , who is not indigent, has either paid for or made

satisf actory payment arrangements for preparation of the clerk’s record.

Unless otherwise excused, a nonindigent appellant must either pay or make arrangements

for the payment of the fees related to preparation of the appellate record to ensure that the recor d

is timely filed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3(a)(2), (b ) (3); see T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(c)

, 37.3(b), (c).

By letter dated June 16, 2016, and pu rsuant to Rules 37.3(b) and 42 .3 (b) and (c) of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, our clerk’s office provided Burns with notice of and an

opportunity to cure this defect. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b)

, 42.3(b) , (c)

. The clerk’s letter further

warned Burns that if he did not remedy the identified defect within ten days of the date of the letter,

his appeal would be subj ect to dismissal for want of prosecution. Id. W e have received no

communication from Burns responsive to the clerk’s June 16 correspondence

, and we have not

received the clerk’s record

.

1 Originally appealed to the Tenth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West 2013). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Tenth Court of Appeal s and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 41.3

.3

Pursuant to Rules 37.3(b) and 42.3(b) and (c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure,

we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: July 12 , 2016

Date Decided: July 13 , 2016
Robert Lee MITCHELL, Petitioner v. Magistrate Judge MILLER, et al.

No. 19-6787

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Paladin Realty Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Board of Directors of the Company, certifies that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                          
|/s/ James R. Worms                                                                        
|James R. Worms                                                                            
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) May 10, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5020 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5020

      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bioallethrin.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2008

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Bioallethrin.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BIOALLETHRIN.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.24.32 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
FINAL P R OGR A M M AT I C E N VI R ON M EN TA L I M PA C T S TAT EM E N T

( P E I S ) F OR S U RVE Y I N G AND M A P PI N G P R O JEC T S IN U . S . 

WAT E R S F OR C O A STA L AND M A R I N E D ATA A C Q U I SI T I ON 

OVERVIEW

The National Ocean Service (NOS) is the nation's leading authority on hydrography, shoreline mapping, and

nautical charts. NOS has prepared a Final PEIS to analyze the potential environmental impacts associated with NOS

recurring data collection projects throughout U.S. coastal and marine waters to characterize submerged features (habitat, 

bathymetry, marine debris). The Proposed Action analyzed in the Final PEIS is to continue NOS data collection projects.

Purpose and Need: The purpose of the Proposed Action is 

to gather accurate and timely data on the marine and

coastal environment. The need for the Proposed Action 

is to ensure safety at sea, economic well-being, and the 

efficient stewardship of public trust resources.

Timespan of the Proposed Action: 5 years

Action Area: The U.S. territorial sea, the contiguous

zone, the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone, U.S. rivers, states’ 

offshore waters, and coastal and riparian lands.

Map of Action Area by Region 

NOS Surveying 

and Mapping 

Activities 

NOS surveying and mapping activities include the use of a variety of equipment and technologies

to gather accurate and timely data on the nature and condition of the marine and coastal

environment. NOS would continue to conduct projects such as hydrographic surveys for nautical

charts, underwater obstruction detection, marine debris surveys, and benthic (sea floor) habitat

characteristic surveys.

Alternative A (No Action) 

Conduct Surveys and Mapping for

Coastal and Marine Data Collection

with Current Technology and Methods

at Current Funding Levels

Alternative B (NOS Preferred Alternative) 

Conduct Surveys and Mapping for Coastal and

Marine Data Collection with Equipment

Upgrades, Improved Hydroacoustic Devices,

and New Tide Stations

Alternative C 

Upgrades and Improvements

with Greater Funding Support

Changes From Draft to Final: The temporal scope has been reduced from six years (2022 to 2027) to five years (2023 to 

2027); although the annual projections of survey efforts have not changed, the total survey effort has decreased. Projects 

undertaken in 2022 relied on existing NOS procedures. Additionally, NOS is committed to incorporating the best available 

information into the Final PEIS. The PEIS has been revised since the draft version was published in June 2021 to reflect 

feedback received through interagency coordination and consultation, stakeholder input, and public comments. 

Resources Analyzed: Habitats, Marine Mammals, Sea Turtles, Fish, Aquatic Macroinvertebrates, Essential Fish Habitat

(EFH), Birds, Cultural and Historic Resources, Socioeconomic Resources, and Environmental Justice.

Acoustic Modeling: NOS performed acoustic modeling to characterize the potential impacts from the proposed active

underwater acoustic sources. The results are presented in the Final PEIS primarily in Section 3.5.2 and Appendix E.
Samuel D. SILVA-RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. HOSPITAL ESPANOL AUXILIO MUTUO DE PUERTO RICO, INC., et al.

No. 19-370

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

The petition for rehearing is denied.
Exhibit 4.2.2

DATED 28th April 2000        SKYEPHARMA PLC        -AND-        MICHAEL ASHTON

EXECUTIVE SERVICE AGREEMENT

Arnheim
Tite & Lewis
St Andrew's House
20 St Andrew Street
London EC4A 3TL
Tel: 0171-212-1616
Fax: 0171-212-1570
Ref: CLG

Copyright
© 1999 Arnheim Tite & Lewis

---



THIS AGREEMENTis made on                         2000

BETWEEN:

IT IS AGREED as follows.

1      INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS

"Appointment"

the employment of the Executive under the terms of this Agreement;"Associated Company"

any company (wherever incorporated), not being a Subsidiary, of which more than 20 per cent but less than 51 per cent of the equity share capital (as defined in section 744 of the Companies Act 1985) is for the time being beneficially owned by
the Company and/or any other Group Company;"Board"

the Board of Directors of the Company from time to time or, where the context permits, such other person or persons as the Board may nominate from time to time as its representative for the purposes of this Agreement;"Commencement Date"

1 January 1999;"Holding Company"

has the meaning given in section 736 of the Companies Act 1985;"Group"

the Company, any Holding Company for the time being of the Company, and any Subsidiary for the time being of the Company or any such Holding Company and any Associated Company and "Group Company" means any company in the Group; and"Subsidiary"

has the meaning given in section 736 of the Companies Act 1985.


2      APPOINTMENT AND DURATION OF AGREEMENT

2

---



3      DUTIES AND POWERS

4      GARDEN LEAVE

3

---





5      OUTSIDE INTERESTS AND DEALINGS

6      SALARY AND EXPENSES

7.     CAR

4

---





8      BENEFITS

9      INCAPACITY

5

---





10    HOLIDAYS

11    CONFIDENTIALITY

12    INVENTIONS

6

---



13    EARLY TERMINATION

7

---





14    OBLIGATIONS ON TERMINATION

15    OBLIGATION AFTER TERMINATION



16    GENERAL

8

---



IN
WITNESS whereof this Agreement has been signed on behalf of the Company and by the Executive:

|SIGNED on behalf of
  
SKYEPHARMA PLC
  
by                 |  | )
)
) |  | SIGNATURE
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----- |  | ---------
|SIGNED by the said
  
MICHAEL ASHTON
  
in the presence of: |  | )
)
) |  | SIGNATURE

| |  | [ILLEGIBLE]105 Piccadilly
London W1J 7NJ |  | 
| |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | 

9

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q ofInhibitex, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter endedMarch 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each ofthe undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:1. The report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ William D.    Johnston, Ph.D.           William D. Johnston, Ph.D. *President and Chief Executive Officer*      /s/ Russell H. Plumb           Russell H. Plumb *Vice President, Finance and Administration,* *Chief Financial Officer*May 10, 2005
28
RYAN v. UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA HOSPITALS

No. COA04-16.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 1, 2005.

Certification Date March 21, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5000 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing (R)–2-[4-(6-chloro1,3-benzoxazol-2-yloxy)phenoxy]propionate (Fenoxaprop Ethyl), (CAS 

No. 71283–80–2), 5-hydroxy-1,3-dimethylpyrazol-4-yl 2-mesyl-4- 

(trifluoromethyl)phenyl ketone (Pyrafulfotole) (CAS No. 365400–11–9), 

2,6-dibromo-4-cyanophenyl octanoate (Bromoxynil octanoate) (CAS No. 

1689–99–2), and 2,6-dibromo-4-cyanophenyl heptanoate (Bromoxynil 

heptanoate) (CAS No. 56634–95–8). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2008 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing 

(R)–2-[4-(6-chloro-1,3-benzoxazol-2- 

yloxy)phenoxy]propionate (Fenoxaprop Ethyl), (CAS No. 

71283–80–2), 5-hydroxy-1,3-dimethylpyrazol-4-yl 2- 

mesyl-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl ketone (Pyrafulfotole) 

(CAS No. 365400–11–9), 2,6-dibromo-4-cyanophenyl octanoate (Bromoxynil octanoate) (CAS No. 1689–99–2), 

and 2,6-dibromo-4-cyanophenyl heptanoate (Bromoxynil 

heptanoate) (CAS No. 56634–95–8). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5000 IH

1 SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING (R)-2-[4-(6-CHLORO-1,3- 

2 BENZOXAZOL-2- 

3 YLOXY)PHENOXY]PROPIONATE 

4 (FENOXAPROP ETHYL) (CAS NO. 71283–80–2), 5- 

5 HYDROXY-1,3-DIMETHYLPYRAZOL-4-YL 2- 

6 MESYL-4-(TRIFLUOROMETHYL)PHENYL KE7 TONE (PYRAFULFOTOLE) (CAS NO. 365400–11– 

8 9), 2,6-DIBROMO-4-CYANOPHENYL OCTA9 NOATE (BROMOXYNIL OCTANOATE) (CAS NO. 

10 1689–99–2), AND 2,6-DIBROMO-4-CYANOPHENYL 

11 HEPTANOATE (BROMOXYNIL HEPTANOATE) 

12 (CAS NO. 56634–95–8). 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

14 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

15 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

16 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l Mixtures containing (R)-2- 

[4-(6-chloro-1,3-benzoxazol2-yloxy)phenoxy]propionate 

(Fenoxaprop Ethyl) (CAS 

No. 71283–80–2), 5-hydroxy-1,3-dimethylpyrazol-4- 

yl 2-mesyl-4- 

(trifluoromethyl)phenyl ketone (Pyrafulfotole) (CAS 

No. 365400–11–9), 2,6- 

dibromo-4-cyanophenyl octanoate (Bromoxynil octanoate) (CAS No. 1689–99– 

2), and 2,6-dibromo-4- 

cyanophenyl heptanoate 

(Bromoxynil heptanoate) 

(CAS No. 56634–95–8) 

(provided for in subheading 

3808.93.15) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5000 IH

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL F. MATTHEWS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior 

District Judge. (3:07-cr-00226-REP-1)

Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael F. Matthews, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael F. Matthews appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Matthews, No. 3:07–cr–00226–REP–1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 8, 2014). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4823 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4823

 To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Sulfentrazone.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2007

  Mr. LaHood introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To extend and modify the temporary reduction of duty on Sulfentrazone.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SULFENTRAZONE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.57 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Sulfentrazone) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(provided for in subheading 2935.00.75)'' 
        and inserting ``(provided for in subheading 2935.00.75) and any 
        formulations containing such compound (provided for in 
        subheading 3808.93.15)'';
            (2) by striking ``1.2%'' and inserting ``3.2%''; and
            (3) in the effective period column, by striking the date 
        contained therein and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```