alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,416
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,668
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,926
<PP&E>                                           4,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,047
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            58
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,778
<SALES>                                         29,421
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,421
<CGS>                                           13,209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,298
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,462
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,836
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,836
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50


</TABLE>
STATE v. CUMMINGS.

No. COA04-543.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 19, 2005.

Certification Date May 9, 2005.

Appeal from Rockingham (03CRS1915, 03CRS1916).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
Exhibit 10.2


 


Severance Compensation Agreement between
Wellesley Bank and Michael W. Dvorak


 


The purpose of this letter is to document
the terms of the severance compensation agreement at Wellesley Bank (The “Bank”) that have been discussed with you.
These terms supersede any prior agreement, whether oral or written, with the Bank.


 


Effective June 20, 2016, your title will
be Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer. In this position, you are eligible for the severance compensation on the
following terms:


 


Termination without cause absent a change
in control. The Bank will continue your base salary (at the rate then in effect) for twenty four (24) months and continue to pay
the Bank’s share of your health insurance premiums if you elect COBRA health care continuation coverage.


 


Termination without cause or voluntary
termination if you are not offered a comparable position within 12 months of a change in control. The Bank will continue your base
salary (at the rate then in effect) for twenty four (24) months and continue to pay the Bank’s share of your health insurance
premiums if you elect COBRA health care continuation coverage.


 


General Release. As a condition to your
receipt of any severance benefit, you will be required to execute a release in a form satisfactory to the Bank.


 


For purposes of this letter agreement,
the terms “cause”, “change in control” and “comparable position” shall have the same meaning
as under the Wellesley Bank Employee Severance Compensation Plan dated January 25, 2012 (the “Plan). A copy of the Plan is
attached for your reference. If you terminate employment in circumstances not expressly covered by this letter agreement, you will
not be eligible for severance.


 


To confirm our agreement with the foregoing,
please sign a copy of this letter and return it to my attention.


 


Should you have any questions, please call me at your convenience.


 


	Dated: May 23, 2016	 	/s/
    Maureen Sullivan
	 	 	EVP, Chief Marketing and
	 	 	Human Resources Officer
	 	 	 
	 	 	Accepted:
	 	 	/s/ Michael
    W. Dvorak
STATE v. POWELL.

No. COA04-1207.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Mecklenburg, (03CRS216984).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
|    |                                                                                                                            |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of MoneyGram International, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2013; |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |
| Date: June 5, 2013 | /s/ W. ALEXANDER HOLMES |
|                    | W. Alexander Holmes |
|                    | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                    | (Principal Financial Officer) |
John F. GODFREY & Patricia Godfrey, Petitioners v. DAVIE COUNTY DEPT. OF SOCIAL SERVICES, et al. Ms. Karen Smith Director, et al., Respondents.

No. 70P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 18, 2004.

John F. Godfrey, Pro Se.

Patricia Godfrey, Pro Se.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioners on the 17th day of February 2004 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Davie County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th day of February 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Petitioners on the 17th day of February 2004 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Davie County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 18th day of February 2004."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH INTERIM
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,203
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,571
<ALLOWANCES>                                       472
<INVENTORY>                                     14,443
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,221
<PP&E>                                           7,496
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,466
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,197
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,797
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              400
<PREFERRED>                                     17,943
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                         261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,197
<SALES>                                         26,966
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,966
<CGS>                                           13,185
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,946
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,308
<INCOME-TAX>                                       291
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,017
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,017
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.31<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.30<F1>

<FN>
<F1>EARNINGS PER SHARE IS CALCULATED BASED UPON PRO FORMA SHARES OUTSTANDING.
SEE NOTE 1 OF NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>



</TABLE>
STATE v. PHILIP MORRIS USA et al.

No. 2PA05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 14, 2005.

Richard W. Ellis, Raleigh, for Trustee and NC Entity.

Matthew W. Sawchak, Thomas D. Blue, Jr., Raleigh, for JP Morgan.

Sidney R. Barrett, Jr., Senior Assistant Attorney General, for Georgia Development Board.

Michael Plumley, Assistant Attorney General, for Kentucky Tobacco Corp.

Joel M. Ressler, Chief Deputy Attorney General, for Pennsylvania Cert. Entity.

Daniel W. Champney, Assistant Attorney General, for Tennessee Certifying Board.

Alexander H. Slaughter, Richmond, VA, for Virginia Certification Board.

Scott Oostdyk, Pittsburgh, PA, for Virginia Tobacco Trust Cert. Board.

Jim W. Phillips, Jr., Greensboro, for Lorillard and R.J. Reynolds.

Larry B. Sitton, Greensboro, for Philip Morris.

Kieran J. Shanahan, Raleigh, for NC Tobacco Growers Association.

Craig A. Nelson, Assistant Attorney General, for Maryland Certification Entity.

Stephen A. Woodson, Associate General Counsel, for NC Farm Bureau Federation.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of March 2005 to join American Farm Bureau Federation, Florida Farm Bureau Federation, Georgia Farm Bureau Federation, Kentucky Farm Bureau Federation, Maryland Farm Bureau, Inc., Missouri Farm Bureau Federation, Ohio Farm Bureau Federation, South Carolina Farm Bureau Federation and Virginia Farm Bureau Federation in the Amicus Curiae Brief of N.C. Farm Bureau Federation:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 14th day of March 2005."
**Exhibit 32.1**

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Merisant Company (the “Company”) forthe period ended September 30, 2006(the “Report”), the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|        | /s/ Paul Block          |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Paul Block              |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | November 13, 2006       |

 

----
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4817 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ethoxyquin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. HULSHOF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ethoxyquin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ETHOXYQUIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.22.32 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Ethoxyquin) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and in7 serting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


HMOORE on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
** EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John R. Miller, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company,LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting. 

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ John R. Miller                      |
|     |  | John R. Miller*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: April 12, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1527 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1527

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
                   allowed for student loan interest.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2013

Mr. Rangel (for himself, Mrs. Napolitano, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Polis, Mr. 
Vargas, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Kind, Ms. Bordallo, 
  Mr. Ellison, Mr. Conyers, and Ms. Wilson of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
                   allowed for student loan interest.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Student Loan Interest Deduction Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DEDUCTION FOR STUDENT LOAN INTEREST.

    (a) Increase in Dollar Limitation and Repeal of Limitation Based on 
Income.--Subsection (b) of section 221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Maximum Deduction.--The deduction allowed by subsection (a) 
for the taxable year shall not exceed $5,000 ($10,000 in the case of a 
joint return).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 221 of such Code is amended by 
striking subsections (e) and (f) (relating to special rules and 
inflation adjustments, respectively) and inserting the following new 
subsection:
    ``(e) Denial of Double Benefit.--No deduction shall be allowed 
under this section for any amount for which a deduction is allowable 
under any other provision of this chapter.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Tom D. Benscoter, certify that: 

 

6. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Prosoft Learning Corporation; 

 

7. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

8. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

9. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

10. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: October 27, 2005
STATE v. Anthony Jerome JACKSON.

No. 123P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Kathleen U. Baldwin, Assistant Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of February 2005 by Defendant for "Direct Appeal and/or Writ of Habeas Corpus, Certiorari or Supersedeas to the Supreme Court of North Carolina to the Denial of his "Writ of Certiorari by the North Carolina Court of Appeals":

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of March 2005."
Billy WATKINS, Petitioner v. STATE of North Carolina and Tracey Cline, Assistant District Attorney.

No. 244P03-12.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 11, 2004.

Billy Watkins, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, James E. Hardin, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the application filed by Petitioner on the 9th day of June 2004 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the *562following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Durham County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2004."
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NationalBeef Packing Company, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 28,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the Report), I, Jay D. Nielsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Jay D. Nielsen                      |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Jay D. Nielsen*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

Date:January 8, 2010

 

----