alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION 906
      OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of T Bancshares, Inc. (the
      “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Patrick G. Adams, as
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Terry Purchal, as Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
      his knowledge:




(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




T
                BANCSHARES, INC.Date:
                August 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Patrick G. AdamsPatrick
                G. Adams
              Chief
                  Executive OfficerDate:
                August 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Terry PurchalTerry
                Purchal
              Chief
                  Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 13 (a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Paul Averback, President and CEO of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, do hereby certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the information contained in the Annual Report for the period ended December 31, 2016 of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation Date: March 30, 2017 /s/ Paul Averback, MDPaul Averback, MDPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNymox Pharmaceutical Corporation


---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1

                          INTERFOODS OF AMERICA, INC.
                      RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                Three Months
                               Three Months                                            2001    Ended 12/31/01
                             Ended 12/31/2001    2001   2000   1999   1998   1997   Pro Forma    Pro Forma
                             --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                          <C>                 <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>        <C>
Earnings

Pretax Income                             451   1,809    597    (16)   (42)   154       1,415             353
Add Fixed Charges:
  Interest on Indebtedness              2,463  10,136  4,440    893    199     54      12,568           2,562
  Portion of Rent
  Representing Interest
  Factor                                  509   2,037  1,170    842    506    268           0             509
  Preferred Stock Dividends                                       1     10     21                           0
                             --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal of Income as
 Adjusted                               3,423  13,982  6,207  1,720    673    497      13,983           3,424
Less Preferred Dividends                                         (1)   (10)   (21)                          0
                             --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Income as Adjusted                3,423  13,982  6,207  1,719    663    476      13,983           3,424

Fixed Charges

Interest on Indebtedness                2,463  10,136  4,440    893    199     54      10,531           2,562
Portion of Rent
Representing Interest Factor              509   2,037  1,170    842    506    268       2,037             509
                             --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subtotal of Fixed Charges               2,972  12,173  5,610  1,735    705    322      12,568           3,071

Preferred Stock Dividends                                         1     10     21
                             --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Fixed Charges and
Preferred Stock Dividends               2,972  12,173  5,610  1,736    715    343      12,588           3,071

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed
Charges                                  1.15    1.15   1.11   0.99   0.93   1.39        1.11            1.11
</TABLE>
STATE EX REL. ZIMMERMAN v. ZIMMERMAN.

No. COA04-1236.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 5, 2005.

Certification Date July 25, 2005.

Appeal from the Mecklenburg (04CVD7584).

Case without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 12, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-41725

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MELINDA LANDEROS HILL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:01-CR-231-2

--------------------

Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Melinda Landeros Hill appeals her sentence, which was imposed

following a guilty-plea to misprision of a felony, namely,

possession with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of

methamphetamine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4. Hill argues that

the district court erred by increasing her offense level by two for

possession of a dangerous weapon pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1)

as a result of the possession of a knife by co-defendant James Eric

Tillman. We review for clear error the district court's
No. 02-41725

-2-

application of the two-level increase under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1).

See United States v. Chavez, 119 F.3d 342, 348 (5th Cir. 1997). 

The knife in question was found in the driver's door

compartment, along with more than 15 grams of methamphetamine,

after Hill and Tillman were stopped for a traffic violation.

Tillman was driving the car, which was registered to Hill’s

estranged husband. Approximately two months earlier, Hill and

Tillman had been arrested after police found more than 50 grams of

methamphetamine in Hill's apartment, which she was sharing with

Tillman. Hill argues that she had no knowledge that Tillman

possessed the knife, that she had never seen him with a knife

before, and that no weapons had been found in her apartment.

A defendant need not have actual knowledge of a co-defendant's

possession of a weapon, and sentencing courts may hold a defendant

accountable under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) if the co-defendant's

possession of the weapon was reasonably foreseeable during the

commission of a narcotics offense. See United States v.

Aguilera-Zapata, 901 F.2d 1209, 1215 (5th Cir. 1990). The district

court did not clearly err in finding that Tillman's possession of

the knife was reasonably foreseeable, since weapons are “tools of

the trade” of drug trafficking. Id.

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****RULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commerce EnergyGroup, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/ A(Amendment No. 3) for the quarterly period endingJanuary 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), LawrenceClayton, Jr., Interim Chief Financial Officer (principalfinancial officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and result of    operations of the Company. By:     /s/ LAWRENCE CLAYTON, JR.       Lawrence Clayton, Jr.     Interim Chief Financial Officer     (Principal Financial Officer)Date: October 31, 2005
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 125 (Thursday, June 30, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 39067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-14001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Telecommunications and Information Administration


Commerce Spectrum Management Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce.

ACTION: Notice, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Telecommunications and Information Administration 
(NTIA) published a document in the Federal Register of June 21, 2022, 
announcing a public meeting of the Commerce Spectrum Management 
Advisory Committee (Committee). This document contained the incorrect 
date for the meeting. The correct meeting date is July 15, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antonio Richardson, Designated Federal 
Officer, at (202) 482-4156 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3f4d565c575e4d5b4c50517f514b565e11585049"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b594248434a594f5844456b455f424a054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>; and/or visit NTIA's 
website at https://www.ntia.gov/category/csmac.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Correction

    In the Federal Register of June 21, 2022, in FR Doc. 2022-13155, on 
page 36827, in the third column, correct the DATES caption to read:
    DATES: The meeting will be held July 15, 2022, from 1:00 p.m. to 
3:00 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time (EDT).

Josephine Arnold,
Acting Chief Counsel, National Telecommunications and Information 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2022-14001 Filed 6-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-60-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1. Home
2. Facts
3. Why is the ocean salty, but rivers flowing into it are not?

**Why is the ocean salty, but rivers flowing into it are not?**  The saltiness of the ocean is the result of **several natural influences and processes**; water from rivers entering the ocean is just one of these factors. Braided river delta at low tide Lower Cook Inlet Kachemak Bay Alaska. Credit: Alaska Shorezone.*Braided river delta at low tide Lower Cook Inlet Kachemak Bay Alaska. Credit: Alaska Shorezone.* In  the beginning, the primeval seas were probably only slightly salty. But over  time, as rain fell to the Earth and ran over the land, breaking up rocks and  transporting their minerals to the ocean, the ocean has become saltier. Rain replenishes freshwater in rivers and streams, so they  don’t taste salty. However, the water in the ocean collects *all* of the salt and minerals from *all* of the rivers that flow into it. It  is estimated that the rivers and streams flowing from the United States alone  discharge 225 million tons of dissolved solids and 513 million tons of suspended  sediment annually to the ocean. Throughout the world, rivers carry an estimated  four billion tons of dissolved salts to the ocean annually. About the same  tonnage of salt from ocean water probably is deposited as sediment on the ocean  bottom and thus, yearly gains may offset yearly losses. In other words, the  ocean today probably has a balanced salt input and output (and so the ocean is  no longer getting saltier).
 More **Information** Why is the ocean salty?   Get **Social** Social
  **Last updated:** 01/18/24 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of the
Smith Barney Convertible Fund:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of the Smith
Barney Convertible Fund (the "Fund") for the year ended July 31, 2000, we
considered its internal control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the
requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments
by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs
of controls.  Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the
entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud may occur
and not be detected.  Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control
to future periods is subject to the risk that it may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in the internal control that might be material weaknesses under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants.  A material weakness is a condition in which the design or
operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to
a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being
audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in
the normal course of performing their assigned functions.  However, we noted
no matters involving the internal control and its operation, including
controls for safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of management, the
Trustees of the Fund, and the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not
intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than the specified
parties.



New York, New York
September 11, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CUIDAO HOLDING CORP. FOR
THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                                JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                  DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                            353,281
<SECURITIES>                                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                      24,226
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  409,951
<PP&E>                                                             18,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      6,220
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                    454,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             128,784
<BONDS>                                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                                             0
<COMMON>                                                              236
<OTHER-SE>                                                        660,918
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                      454,357
<SALES>                                                            68,387
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                   68,387
<CGS>                                                              40,359
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                  197,365
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                  1,254
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                             (170,591)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                         0
<CHANGES>                                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                                    (170,591)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                      (.076)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                      (.076)
        

</TABLE>
Carol Johnene MORRIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-6786

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 21, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petition in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See *Martin* v. *District of Columbia Court of Appeals* , 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (*per curiam* ).
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 51 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 51

To amend titles XI and XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the cap 
  on Medicaid payments for Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the 
Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa and to adjust the Medicaid 
             statutory matching rate for those territories.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

 Mrs. Christensen introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend titles XI and XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the cap 
  on Medicaid payments for Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, the 
Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa and to adjust the Medicaid 
             statutory matching rate for those territories.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF THE CAP ON MEDICAID PAYMENTS FOR PUERTO RICO, THE 
              VIRGIN ISLANDS, GUAM, THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, AND 
              AMERICAN SAMOA AND ADJUSTMENT OF THE MEDICAID STATUTORY 
              MATCHING RATE FOR THOSE TERRITORIES.

    (a) Removal of Cap.--
            (1) In general.--Section 1108 of the Social Security Act 
        (42 U.S.C. 1308) is amended by striking subsections (f) and 
        (g).
            (2) Conforming amendments.--(A) Section 1902(j) of such Act 
        (42 U.S.C. 1396a(j)) is amended by striking ``the limitation in 
        section 1108(f),''.
            (B) Section 1905(u) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(u)) is 
        amended by striking paragraph (4).
    (b) Adjustment of Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP).--
Section 1905(b)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)(2)) is amended by 
striking ``50 per centum'' and inserting ``for purposes of this title 
only 77 percent''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect on the date of the enactment of this Act, and shall apply to 
expenditures made on or after such date.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A forthe year ending December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Adrian Adams, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.         /s/ Adrian Adams   Adrian Adams   President andChief Executive Officer September 13, 2006  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to KosPharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
STATE v. SMITH

No. COA03-1525

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed January 18, 2005

Certification Date February 7, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130012 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 130012 

 COA: 261755 

Antrim CC: 01-003445-FH 

KEVIN THOMAS MERKEL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 14, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

s0522 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2006 

Clerk