alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeOcean Facts

# What is NERRS? 

## The National Estuarine Research Reserve System, or NERRS, is a partnership between NOAA and coastal states to **study and protect vital coastal and estuarine resources**.

Great Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve is located on the New Hampshire and Maine border. 

National Estuarine Research Reserves serve as "living laboratories," with opportunities for both scientists and graduate  students to conduct research. Reserves also conduct long-term water quality and habitat monitoring.

The National Estuarine Research Reserve System is a network  of 29 areas representing different biogeographic regions of the United States.  The reserves are protected for long-term research, water quality and habitat monitoring, education, and coastal stewardship. Each reserve is managed on a daily basis by  a lead state agency or university, with input from local partners. NOAA provides funding, national guidance, and technical assistance.

Reserve staff work with local communities and regional groups to address  natural resource management issues, such as non-point source pollution, habitat  restoration, and invasive species. Through integrated research and education,  the reserves help communities develop strategies to deal successfully with their  coastal resource issues. 

Reserves provide adult audiences with training  on estuarine issues of concern in their local communities. They also offer field  classes for K-12 students and support teachers through professional development  programs in marine education.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - National Estuarine Research Reserve System 
          - ecosystems/nerrs/">Explore: NERRS 
          - Estuaries  (audio podcast)

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
#### Lee H. KESSLER et al., Appellants, v. PETTIBONE-MULLIKEN CORPORATION, a corporation, et al.

No. 14779.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Aug. 11, 1953.

B. T. Perrine, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Carlton Hill and Donald J. Simpson, Chicago, Ill., for appellants.

Warren C. Horton and Louis Robertson, Chicago, Ill., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of District Court vacated, and case remanded for entry of final judgment by consent, etc., on motion of appellants and consent of appellees. 108 F.Supp. 748.
Katrina Letress GRIFFIS v. Patricia Joyce LAZAROVICH and John Edward Lazarovich, and Cassandra Michelle Leak.

No. 38P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

E. Gregory Stott, Raleigh, for Griffis.

Dayatra T. King, Raleigh, for Lazarovichs.

Jonathan E. Hall, Raleigh, Kathleen M. Millikan, Durham, for Leak.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 22nd day of January 2004 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> 
*136
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."
Amelia N. CLARK, Petitioner v. DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES and Division of Medical Assistance, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Respondent.

No. 595P03.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Melanie M. Hamilton, Thomas E. Cone, Greensboro, for Clark.

*555Grady L. Balentine, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 12th day of November 2003 by Petitioner's in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           871,441
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,525,537
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,377,602
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,029,837
<PP&E>                                         5,967,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,719,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 9,452,501
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,058,400
<BONDS>                                        3,954,201
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                        1,595
<COMMON>                                           4,774
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,824,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   9,452,501
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              12,849,776
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,225,484
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               245,505
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  870,835
<INCOME-TAX>                                     371,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              498,935
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     498,935
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .12


</TABLE>
- Home
- Facts
- What is a ghost forest?

# **What is a ghost forest?**

## A ghost forest is the **watery remains** of a once verdant woodland.

*A ghost forest on Capers Island, South Carolina.*

As sea level rises, more and more saltwater encroaches on the           land. Along the world’s coasts and estuaries, invading           seawater advances and overtakes the fresh water that           deciduous trees rely upon for sustenance. The salty water           slowly poisons living trees, leaving a haunted ghost forest           of dead and dying timber. Still standing in or near brackish           water, the decaying trees of a ghost forest resemble giant           graying pillars that protrude into the air.

Researchers report that the rapid increase in ghost           forests represents a dramatic visual picture of environmental           changes along coastal plains located at or near sea level. In           many areas, rising sea levels combine with land sinking from the last ice age, as is currently happening in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

The Mississippi Delta region of Louisiana is           undergoing changes due to rising waters, the sinking of Earth's crust, and sediments compacting along the           Mississippi River. With land and water constantly shifting,           woodlands die and are buried in open water. This is apparent           along North Carolina’s maritime forests, where only a glimpse of once           peaceful and verdant groves, now ghost forests, remain.

##### More **Information**

 How living shorelines protect ecosystems (podcast) 

 What is subsidence? 

 What is glacial isostatic adjustment? 

 What is a maritime forest? 

##### **Last updated:**

######  						 01/18/24 					

**Author:** NOAA

How to cite this article

Contact Us

##### 					Feedback

        -  Provide Feedback 
        -  Contact Us
        -  Report an error

##### 					Social

        - 
        - 
        - 
*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
							About NOS						- About Us
- NOS Program Offices
- Media Inquiries
- Website Acknowledgements
- Site Index
- Disclaimer
							More Resources						- Freedom of Information Act
- Accessibility
- Information Quality
- Privacy Policy
- NOS For Employees
- USA.gov
-  Department of Commerce
-  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
-  National Ocean Service
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Jay D. Nielsen, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company,LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant'sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting. 

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Jay D. Nielsen                      |
|     |  | Jay D. Nielsen*Chief Financial Officer* |

Date: January 9, 2006
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5111 

To grant to a State with an unemployment rate that is equal to or greater 

than 125 percent of the national unemployment rate authority to use 

Federal funds made available to such State for job training programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2008 

Mr. HOEKSTRA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To grant to a State with an unemployment rate that is 

equal to or greater than 125 percent of the national 

unemployment rate authority to use Federal funds made 

available to such State for job training programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Maximizing the Use 

5 of Federal Funds for Job Training Act’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5111 IH

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORITY TO CONSOLIDATE OR TRANSFER CER2 TAIN FUNDS. 

3 (a) AUTHORITY AVAILABLE.—A State with an unem4 ployment rate that is equal to or greater than 125 percent 

5 of the national unemployment rate is authorized to con6 solidate or transfer, without limitation, any funds made 

7 available to such State under the programs described in 

8 subsection (b). 

9 (b) DESIGNATED PROGRAMS.—Subsection (a) applies 

10 to— 

11 (1) any formula grant program carried out 

12 under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (29 

13 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.); and 

14 (2) any funds made available to the State under 

15 part II of subchapter B of chapter 2 of title II of 

16 the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2295 et seq.). 

17 (c) DURATION.—The authority provided by sub18 section (a) shall remain in effect for a period of 2 years 

19 for a State or until the date on the State’s unemployment 

20 rate is less than 125 percent of the national unemploy21 ment rate, whichever occurs later. 

22 (d) NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT RATE DEFINED.—In 

23 this section, the term ‘‘national employment rate’’ means 

24 the most recent rate of unemployment announced each 

25 month by Bureau of Labor Statistics of the Department 

26 of Labor based upon data from the current populations 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5111 IH

1 survey of households conducted for the Bureau by the Bu2 reau of the Census of the Department of Commerce. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
# L_2016161EN.01003901.xml

| 18.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 161/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 161/39

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2016/981

of 16 June 2016

appointing a member of the Court of Auditors

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal by the Republic of Lithuania,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of Ms Rasa BUDBERGYTĖ expired on 6 May 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of Ms Rasa BUDBERGYTĖ expired on 6 May 2016.

| (2) | A new appointment should therefore be made, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A new appointment should therefore be made,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Rimantas ŠADŽIUS is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 16 June 2016 to 15 June 2022.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 16 June 2016.

For the Council

The President

L.F. ASSCHER

---

(1)  Opinion of 7 June 2016 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

---
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bimini Capital Management,
Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert E. Cauley, Vice Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of, and for, the periods presented in the
  Report.





May
      12, 2008
            
            /s/ Robert E. Cauley
              Robert
      E. Cauley
              Vice
      Chairman of the Board, President
              and
      Chief Executive Officer
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4976 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain cathode-ray tubes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain 

cathode-ray tubes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CATHODE-RAY TUBES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.85.42 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 certain cathode-ray tubes) is amended by striking the date 

7 in the effective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4976 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**














**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE**


**OFFICER
      REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING**


**FINANCIAL
      STATEMENTS**









I,
      Neil
      Smit, the President and Chief Executive Officer of CCO Holdings, LLC and CCO
      Holdings Capital Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
      period ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission:




|· | fully
              complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934; and
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|· | the
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------








/s/
      Neil
      Smit


Neil
      Smit


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


May 15 ,
      2007
STATE v. CRUZ AND McQUEEN.

No. 561A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 8, 2004.

James R. Parish, Fayetteville, for McQueen.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 6th day of December 2004 for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Cumberland County Board of Education shall have up to and including the 16th day of January 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 8th day of December 2004."
[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 121 (Friday, June 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 37892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13460]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Notice of Permits Issued Under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 
1978

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice of permit issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) is required to publish 
notice of permits issued under the Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978. 
This is the required notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew Titmus, ACA Permit Officer, 
Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower 
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703-292-4479; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b5a585a6b7e6976726f685b75687d357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1f5e5c5e6f7a6d72766b6c5f716c7931787069">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 13, 2022, the National Science 
Foundation published a notice in the Federal Register of a permit 
application received. The permit was issued on June 16, 2022 to:

1. Dr. Paul Ponganis, Permit No. 2023-002

Erika N. Davis,
Program Specialist, Office of Polar Programs.
[FR Doc. 2022-13460 Filed 6-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (the "Company") for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), David T. Hamamoto, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



Date: May 6, 2010

By:

/s/ DAVID T. HAMAMOTO David T. Hamamoto Chief Executive Officer


This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

75

---



QuickLinks