alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of Hospira, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, Terrence C. Kearney, Senior Vice President, Finance andChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Terrence  C. Kearney        |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Terrence C.  Kearney            |
| Senior Vice  President, Finance |
| and Chief  Financial Officer    |
| August 11,  2005                |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Hospira, Inc.and will be retained by Hospira, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
BROOKS v. CAPSTAR CORPORATION.

No. 110A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2005.

David Parker, Statesville, for Patricia Brooks.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of March 2005 by Defendants for Extension of Time to File Brief:

*134"Motion Allowed. Defendant (Capstar Corporation, et al) shall have up to and including the 25th day of April 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of March 2005."
STATE v. MAYNOR

No. COA04-379

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 3, 2005.

Certification Date May 23, 2005.

Appeal from the Robeson (01CRS54907).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this amended Quarterly Report of Effective Profitable Software, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the periodending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary Moore, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 , fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 , fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Effective Profitable Software, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: September 28, 2006

 

*/s/ Gary Moore*

Gary Moore

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. James Edwin SUTTON.

No. 15P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

James N. Freeman, Jr., for James Edwin Sutton.

Gary Govert, Special Deputy Attorney General, Charles W. Hipps, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 10th day of January 2005 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of January 2005 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
EXHIBIT 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Premier Alliance Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Mark S. Elliott, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Premier Alliance Group, Inc., and will be retained by Premier Alliance Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.








/s/ Mark S. Elliott


Mark S. Elliott


Chief Executive Officer


January 04 , 2012
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-K
FOR PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,073
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,499
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,445<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,355
<PP&E>                                           5,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,119
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,679
<BONDS>                                          4,420<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,012
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,119
<SALES>                                         24,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,971
<CGS>                                           19,484
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,451<F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 714
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    806
<INCOME-TAX>                                       205
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                601
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       601
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
<FN>
<F1>Represents costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings.
<F2>Represents obligations under capital leases.
<F3>Includes project costs and operating expenses.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Order entered November 19, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00018-CR

RICHARD CLAYTON KIMBERLIN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-80175-2016

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s November 16, 2018 motion for extension of time to file its 

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received on November 16, 2018 filed as of 

the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
HomeOcean Facts

# How far does sound travel in the ocean? 

## The distance that sound travels in the ocean varies greatly, depending primarily upon water temperature and pressure.

Water temperature and pressure determine how far sound travels in the ocean. 

While sound moves at a much faster speed in the water than in air, the distance that sound waves travel is primarily dependent upon ocean temperature and pressure. While  pressure continues to increase as ocean depth increases, the temperature of the ocean only decreases up to a certain point, after which it remains relatively stable. These factors have a curious effect on how (and how far) sound waves travel.

Imagine a whale is swimming through the ocean and calls  out to its pod. The whale produces sound waves that move like ripples in the  water. As the whale’s sound waves travel  through the water, their speed decreases with increasing depth (as the temperature drops),  causing the **sound waves to refract downward**. Once the sound waves reach the  bottom of what is known as the *thermocline* layer, the speed  of sound reaches its minimum. The thermocline is  a region characterized by  rapid change in temperature  and pressure which occurs  at different depths around the world. Below the  thermocline "layer," the temperature remains constant, but pressure continues to increase. This causes the speed of sound to increase  and makes the **sound waves refract upward**.  

The area in the ocean where sound waves refract  up and down is known as the "sound channel."  The  **channeling of sound waves** allows sound to travel thousands of miles without  the signal losing considerable energy.   In fact, hydrophones, or underwater microphones, if placed at the proper  depth, can pick up whale songs and manmade noises from many kilometers away. 

###### **Search** Our Facts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - Noise in the Ocean: A National Issue (National Marine Sanctuaries)
          - Just how noisy is the ocean? Learn about a NOAA Effort to Monitor Underwater Sound
          -  Sound in the Sea Gallery
          -  Acoustic Monitoring

**Last updated:**   01/20/23**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
MAKO ONE CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. CEDAR RAPIDS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY.

No. 19-709

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofHospira, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, Christopher B. Begley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   /s/ Christopher B. Begley |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher B. Begley                 |
| Chief Executive Officer               |
| May 12, 2005                     |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Hospira, Inc. and will be retained by Hospira, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

1

----
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

The undersigned,
  Lianyun Han, Chief Executive Officer of NUTRASTAR INTERNATIONAL INC. (the Company),
  DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this
16thday of August 2010.

/s/ Lianyun
HanLianyun Han Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Nutrastar International Inc. and will be retained by
Nutrastar International Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6546

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RODERICK BLACK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle,

Chief District Judge. (CR-94-15)

Submitted: June 24, 2004 Decided: July 2, 2004

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Black, Appellant Pro Se. Frank DeArmon Whitney, United

States Attorney, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States

Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

The district court construed Black’s § 3582(c) motion as a

motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and dismissed it

without prejudice on the ground that it was successive. To the

extent that Black’s motion could be construed as a § 2255 motion,

relief would not be warranted because it would be successive.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Roderick Black appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice Black’s motion for a reduction in

sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000). Black contends that he

is entitled to a reduction in sentence based upon Amendments 505

and 516 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines, which reduced

the upper limit of the Drug Quantity Table and became effective

November 1, 1995. This claim was raised and rejected in Black’s

earlier § 3582 motion. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this op inion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limit ed circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10142

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-appellee,

versus

LONZO HURD,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CR-260-6-R)

February 5, 1999

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, POLITZ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lonzo Hurd appeals his conviction on a guilty plea of violating 18 U.S.C. §

666, contending that the district court erred in failing to dismiss the indictment.

Having considered the b r iefs and oral arguments of the parties, in light of the

pertinent parts of the record, and finding no error, the judgment appealed is

AFFIRMED.
---

EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Beef Packing Company, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 27, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jay D. Nielsen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ Jay D. NielsenJay D. Nielsen

Chief Financial Officer





Date: January 7, 2011
STATE of North Carolina v. John Edward McCOLLUM.

No. 39P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

William B. Gibson, Winston-Salem, for McCollum.

*772Jeffrey R. Edwards, Assistant Attorney General, Kenneth W. Honeycutt, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 28th day of January 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER,

AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Bradley T. Miller, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. The accompanying amended annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Viisage Technology, Inc.



Date: July 27, 2006/s/    BRADLEY T.
MILLERBradley T. Miller Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as part of this report.
# Official Journal C 130A/28 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 130A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5128 May 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 130A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5128 May 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 130A/01 | Vacancy for an Executive Director (grade AD14) of the Artemis Joint Undertaking (Brussels) — COM/2008/10060 | 1 |
| 2008/C 130A/02 | Vacancy for an Executive Director (grade AD14) of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking (Brussels) — COM/2008/10061 | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2008/C 130A/01

Vacancy for an Executive Director (grade AD14) of the Artemis Joint Undertaking (Brussels) — COM/2008/10060

1

2008/C 130A/02

Vacancy for an Executive Director (grade AD14) of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking (Brussels) — COM/2008/10061

6

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```
 
 
WHEAT-HRSpring - MINNEAPOLIS GRAIN EXCHANGE                          Code-001626
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 04/08/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(CONTRACTS OF 5,000 BUSHELS)                         OPEN INTEREST:       71,361
COMMITMENTS
  22,295    5,477    3,214   30,492   47,599   56,001   56,290   15,360   15,071

CHANGES FROM 04/01/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        186)
    -926     -459      822      248       93      144      456       42     -270

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    31.2      7.7      4.5     42.7     66.7     78.5     78.9     21.5     21.1

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       96)
      35       12       19       37       36       81       59
```

----

Updated April 11, 2014
DOVE v. N.C. SUPREME COURT LIBRARY.

No. 600P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

Tom Davis, Librarian, for N.C. Supreme Court Library.

*318The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of November 2004 by Plaintiff for Relief:

"Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of April 2005."
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) by
      China Fire & Security Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Robert Yuan, hereby
      certify that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.


Dated:
                August 13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Robert YuanName: Robert
                YuanTitle:  
                Principal Accounting Officer