alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit10.2**

 

 

August3, 2006

LeslieJ. Browne, Ph.D.
| Re: |   | Amendment to Employment Agreement amended and  restated as of February 27, 2006   between Pharmacopeia Drug Discovery, Inc. (“Pharmacopeia”) and Leslie  Johnston Browne, Ph.D.   (the “Agreement”) |
|-----|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dear Dr. Browne:

Referenceis made to the Agreement.

Inconsideration of your continued employment by Pharmacopeia, Pharmacopeia andyou hereby agree to amend and restate Section 4(j) (Termination;Resignation; Permanent Disability; Death—Certain Additional Payments) of theAgreement as follows:

Section 4(j)

Pharmacopeia and you agree to add thefollowing paragraph as a new third paragraph in Section 4(j):

“Notwithstanding anything herein to thecontrary, if any payments due under this Agreement would subject Dr. Browne toany tax imposed under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code if suchpayments were made at the time otherwise provided herein, then the paymentsthat cause such taxation shall be payable in a single lump sum on the first daywhich is at least six months after the date of Dr. Browne’s “separation ofservice” as set forth in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and theregulations issued thereunder.”

[The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.]

----

 

Ifyou are in agreement with the terms of this letter agreement please sign belowand return one copy to my attention.
| Very truly yours,                     |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |   |
| /s/ Joseph A. Mollica, Ph.D.          |   |
|                                  |   |
| Joseph A. Mollica, Ph.D.              |   |
| Chairman                              |   |
|                                  |   |
|                                  |   |
| ACKNOWLEDGED, AGREED AND              |   |
| ACCEPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF              |   |
| AUGUST, 2006                          |   |
|                                  |   |
|                                  |   |
|                                  |   |
| /s/ Leslie J. Browne, Ph.D.           |   |
| Leslie J. Browne, Ph.D.               |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Edward F. Feighan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProCentury Corporation (“ProCentury”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for ProCentury and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating toProCentury, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of ProCentury’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in ProCentury’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during ProCentury’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ProCentury’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. ProCentury’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ProCentury’s auditors and theaudit committee of ProCentury’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectProCentury’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in ProCentury’s internal control over financial reporting.       November 10, 2005     Date         /s/ Edward F. Feighan     Signature         Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer     Title
# C_2006045EN.01001001.xml

| 23.2.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 45/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 45/10

---

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

of 23 November 2004

in Case E-1/04 Fokus Bank ASA and The Norwegian State, represented by Skattedirektoratet (the Directorate of Taxes)

(Free movement of capital — taxation of dividends — tax credit granted exclusively to shareholders resident in a Contracting Party — denial of procedural rights to shareholders resident in other Contracting Parties)

(Free movement of capital — taxation of dividends — tax credit granted exclusively to shareholders resident in a Contracting Party — denial of procedural rights to shareholders resident in other Contracting Parties)

(2006/C 45/06)

In Case E-1/04 between Fokus Bank ASA and the Norwegian State, represented by Skattedirektoratet, — REQUEST to the Court by Frostating lagmannsrett (Frostating Court of Appeal) on the interpretation of the rules of free movement of capital within the EEA, the Court, composed of Carl Baudenbacher, President and Judge-Rapporteur, Per Tresselt and Thorgeir Örlygsson, Judges, gave judgment on 23 November 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:

| 1. | Article 40 EEA precludes legislation whereby shareholders resident in a specific Contracting Party are granted a tax credit on dividends paid by a company resident in that Contracting Party, whereas non-resident shareholders are not granted such a tax credit. Whether the taxpayer is resident in another Contracting Party which, in a tax agreement with the Contracting Party wherein the dividend is distributed, has undertaken to grant credit for withholding tax, or whether the taxpayer in the specific case actually is granted, or will be granted, credit for the withholding tax, is of no legal significance. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 40 EEA precludes legislation whereby shareholders resident in a specific Contracting Party are granted a tax credit on dividends paid by a company resident in that Contracting Party, whereas non-resident shareholders are not granted such a tax credit. Whether the taxpayer is resident in another Contracting Party which, in a tax agreement with the Contracting Party wherein the dividend is distributed, has undertaken to grant credit for withholding tax, or whether the taxpayer in the specific case actually is granted, or will be granted, credit for the withholding tax, is of no legal significance.

| 2. | In a situation such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, it is not consistent with the EEA Agreement that a Contracting Party deals solely with the distributing company when assessing and reassessing the withholding tax without notifying the non-resident shareholders. |
| --- | --- |

2.

In a situation such as the one at issue in the main proceedings, it is not consistent with the EEA Agreement that a Contracting Party deals solely with the distributing company when assessing and reassessing the withholding tax without notifying the non-resident shareholders.

---
ESTATE OF ANDERSON v. DANA CORP.

No. COA04-96

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed December 21, 2004

Certification Date January 10, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Samuel Wayne GUY.

No. 444P98-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Samuel Wayne Guy, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Edward W. Grannis, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 9th day of February 2005 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cumberland County:

"Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 3rd day of March 2005."
Order entered January 8, 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00729

- CR

JEAN KENNETH TONEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 15th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial C ourt Cause No. 061707



### O RDER

We GRANT the State’s second motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER

the brief received December 23, 2013 filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Trayone Lefferio BELL, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-5753

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.
HomeOcean Facts

# Where can I get tide predictions? 

## View **tidal predictions** on the Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services Website.

Tide predictions are available for locations on the U.S. coastline, most of the islands in the Caribbean, and many islands in the Pacific Ocean. The image above shows tide predictions for Santa Monica, CA, as generated through the NOAA CO-OPS Tides and Currents website.

The Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and  Services (CO-OPS) is primarily responsible for predicting and measuring water  levels and currents and disseminating this information. CO-OPS collects,  analyzes, and distributes such data to maintain safe maritime navigation and  waterborne commerce.

Tide predictions may be generated through the NOAA Tide  Predictions service of the CO-OPS Tides & Currents website. These predictions are available for locations on the U.S. coastline, most of the islands in the Caribbean,  and many islands in the Pacific Ocean. Tide  predictions for these locations can be generated for up to two years from the current  year – two years in the past to two years into the future. This service offers a wide variety of  capabilities and options, allowing customers to generate tide predictions specific  to their needs.

 Tide predictions are also published annually in a series of  books; these Tide Tables are  are produced by CO-OPS and printed/distributed through  several commercial publishers.  A list of  these publishers, with contact information, are available from the Frequently  Asked Questions pages  of the CO-OPS website. 

###### **Search** Our Facts

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          -  NOAA Tide Predictions ,  Center for Operational  Oceanographic Products and Services
          -  Tides  and Water Levels ,  NOS Education

**Last updated:**   01/20/23**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425RobynL.Weber,Esq.WeberLawFirm2215thAvenueHelena,MT59601Tel.(406)449-4433Robyn@weberlawhelena.comAttorneyforRespondent/AppelleeEMILYANNBACONINTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANAINTHEMARRIAGEOF:JOSHUAARNOLDBACON,Petitioner/Appellant,v.EMILYANNBACON,Respondent/Appellee.CauseNo.DA22-0307ORDERGRANTINGEXTENSIONOFTIMETOHOLDMEDIATIONUponJointMotionofthePartiesandgoodcauseappearing,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatthepartiesshallhaveuptoandincludingTuesday,October18,2022bywhichtoholdthemediationinthismatter.ItisfurtherorderedthatthetimelinepursuanttopursuanttoM.R.App.P.,7(5)(d)isherebyextendedtoTuesday,October18,2022.SOORDEREDthisdayofAugust,2022.c:RobynWeber,Esq.DavidGallik,Esq.PatrickT.Fox,Esq.SUPREMECOURTJUSTICEElectronically signed by:Mike McGrathChief Justice, Montana Supreme CourtAugust 17 202208/17/2022Case Number: DA 22-0307
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****RULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commerce EnergyGroup, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/ A(Amendment No. 2) for the quarterly period endingApril 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), LawrenceClayton, Jr., Interim Chief Financial Officer (principalfinancial officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and result of    operations of the Company. By:     /s/ LAWRENCE CLAYTON, JR.       Lawrence Clayton, Jr.     Interim Chief Financial Officer     (Principal Financial Officer)Date: October 31, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and
Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our
knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Leo F. Wells, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III      
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 22, 2011         



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Douglas P. Williams
|Douglas P. Williams    
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 22, 2011
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Viisage Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Bernard Bailey, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
   as of December 31, 2002 (the last date of the period covered by the Report).

Date: March 27, 2003



    /s/ Bernard Bailey
--------------------------
      Bernard Bailey
 Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Curtis J. Larrimer, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of GNC Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end if the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  (a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial
information; and(b)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 10, 2005

/s/ Curtis J. LarrimerCurtis J. LarrimerChief Financial Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Anthony HOOVER.

No. 370P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 2, 2004.

Anthony Hoover, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 19th day of July 2004 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Forsyth County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 2nd day of December 2004."
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/25/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      102,634
COMMITMENTS
  21,334   11,422    3,983   71,214   84,217   96,531   99,622    6,103    3,012

CHANGES FROM 03/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -25,375)
  -1,973    3,719   -2,179  -20,314  -26,357  -24,466  -24,817     -909     -558

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    20.8     11.1      3.9     69.4     82.1     94.1     97.1      5.9      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       92)
      13        7        2       55       34       68       43
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 03/25/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      237,889
COMMITMENTS
  77,538   34,766    2,524  147,207  191,602  227,269  228,892   10,620    8,997

CHANGES FROM 03/18/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:    -49,749)
   1,266  -12,589   -2,023  -42,266  -28,082  -43,023  -42,694   -6,726   -7,055

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    32.6     14.6      1.1     61.9     80.5     95.5     96.2      4.5      3.8

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      184)
      57       25        7       69       61      130       89
```

----

Updated March 28, 2014
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Arco Platform Limited (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2018 (the “Report”), I, Ari de Sá Cavalcante Neto, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



April  17, 2019



|/s/ Ari de Sá Cavalcante Neto
|-----------------------------
|Ari de Sá Cavalcante Neto    
|Chief Executive Officer