alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                       428
<INVENTORY>                                     14,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,154
<PP&E>                                           8,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,228
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,868
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              400
<PREFERRED>                                     17,943
<COMMON>                                             5
<OTHER-SE>                                         357
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,228
<SALES>                                         16,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,565
<CGS>                                            7,602
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,319
<INCOME-TAX>                                       462
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                857
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       857
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25<F1>

<FN>
<F1>EARNINGS PER SHARE IS CALCULATED BASED UPON PRO FORMA SHARES OUTSTANDING.
SEE NOTE 1 OF NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</FN>

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4904 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4904

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,3',4,4'-
                  Biphenyltetracarboxylic dianhydride.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

 Mr. Lampson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 3,3',4,4'-
                  Biphenyltetracarboxylic dianhydride.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 3,3',4,4'-BIPHENYLTETRACARBOXYLIC DIANHYDRIDE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.05.11 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of Effective Profitable Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary Moore, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Effective Profitable Software, Inc. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Dated: June 7, 2006

 

By: */s/ Gary Moore*

Gary Moore

Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer
BRYSON v. COOPER

No. COA03-1484

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed October 19, 2004

Certification Date November 8, 2004

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. Bertram McELHINEY.

No. 544P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Kenneth W. Honeycutt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 24th day of February 2005 by Defendant to Proceed in Forma Pauperis:

"Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2005."
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10739

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RONNIE RAY JACKSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4-98-CR-29-1-Y

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1998

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Ronnie Ray Jackson appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Jackson contends that the district court

erred in denying his motion to dismiss the indictment on the

ground that § 922(g)(1) is unconstitutional in view of the

Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549

(1995). Jackson acknowledges that this court rejected this

argument in United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 
No. 98-10739

-2-

1996), but stated that he is raising this argument to preserve it

for further review. In Rawls, this court held that the reasons

the Supreme Court gave in Lopez for holding 18 U.S.C. § 922(q)

unconstitutional do not apply to § 922(g). Rawls, 85 F.3d at

242. A mere showing that the weapon in question traveled at some

time from one state to another is enough to demonstrate the

jurisdictional nexus with interstate commerce. United States v.

Gresham, 118 F.3d 258, 264-65 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 118

S. Ct. 702 (1998). Rawls is binding precedent. United States v.

Kuban, 94 F.3d 971, 973 (5th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct.

716 (1997); United States v. Eastland, 989 F.2d 760, 768 n.16

(5th Cir. 1993)(“In this circuit, one panel may not overrule the

decision -- right or wrong -- of a prior panel, absent en banc

reconsideration or a superseding contrary decision of the Supreme

Court.”).

AFFIRMED.
MANNING, et al. v. COUNTY OF HALIFAX.

No. 589PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2005.

Christopher W. Jones, John W. O'Tuel, III, Raleigh, for County of Halifax.

Janet Dudley, for Manning, et al.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of March 2005 by N.C. Association of County Commissioners for leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Unless already submitted, the Amicus Brief shall be submitted to *135the court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 28(i). By order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of March 2005."
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, was made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report was being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal year that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /S/ STANTON NELSON

Stanton NelsonChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit








AMENDMENT ONE
TO THE
AMKOR TECHNOLOGY, INC. 
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


Pursuant to the authority reserved to it in Section 21 of the Amkor Technology, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Board of Directors of Amkor Technology, Inc. (the “Board”) hereby amends the Plan as follows, effective May 15, 2019: 


Section 12(d) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


(d)    Initial Award. Each person who first becomes an Outside Director will be automatically granted: (i) an Option to purchase a number of Shares equal to the product of (I) 20,000 multiplied by (II) a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days in the period beginning on the date such person first becomes an Outside Director and ending on the date of the first annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company thereafter, and the denominator of which is 365 (the “Fraction”) rounded down to the nearest whole number (the “Initial Option”) and (ii) an Award of Restricted Stock equal to the product of (I) $60,000 divided by the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date such person first becomes an Outside Director multiplied by (II) the Fraction rounded down to the nearest whole number (the “Initial Restricted Stock Award”). The Initial Option and the Initial Restricted Stock Award shall be granted on or about the date on which such person first becomes an Outside Director, whether through election by the stockholders of the Company or appointment by the Board to fill a vacancy; provided, however, that an Inside Director who ceases to be an Inside Director, but who remains a Director, will not receive an Initial Option or an Initial Restricted Stock Award.


Section 12(g) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


(g)    Annual Restricted Stock Award. Each Outside Director will be automatically granted Restricted Stock having a Fair Market Value of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) (an “Annual Restricted Stock Award”) on each date of the annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5060 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to allow athletes admitted 

as nonimmigrants described in section 101(a)(15)(P) of such Act to 

renew their period of authorized admission in 5-year increments. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2008 

Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California (for herself, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. 

ENGEL, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. 

COBLE, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. COHEN, Mr. PASCRELL, Mrs. MCCARTHY of 

New York, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. PERLMUTTER, Mr. BECERRA, Mr. BISHOP

of New York, and Mr. SERRANO) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to allow 

athletes admitted as nonimmigrants described in section 

101(a)(15)(P) of such Act to renew their period of authorized admission in 5-year increments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERIOD OF AUTHORIZED ADMISSION FOR CER4 TAIN NONIMMIGRANT ATHLETES. 

5 Section 214(a)(2)(B) of the Immigration and Nation6 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(a)(2)(B)) is amended by striking 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5060 IH

1 ‘‘for an additional period of up to 5 years.’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘in 5-year increments.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
HomeOcean Facts

# What role does the ocean play in the weather?

## The ocean plays a leading role in the Earth's climate.

Hurricane Gustav was one of a series of hurricanes to strike the United States in 2008. Hurricanes originate over the tropical regions of the ocean under conditions where high humidity, light winds, and warm sea surface temperatures combine.

The  ocean plays an important role in shaping our climate and weather patterns. 

Warm  ocean waters provide the energy to fuel storm systems that provide fresh water vital to all living things. Understanding and predicting precipitation is critical to farmers who decide which crops to plant, and how deep, based in part on soil moisture levels. Crop and food prices may increase when weather that is too wet or too dry adversely affects crops. 

Like precipitation, extreme  heat and cold also affect livestock management. 

Weather prediction can be a life-saving tool. Aside from helping people prepare for catastrophic storms, prediction can help  citizens and governments anticipate extreme hot and cold temperatures, which may cause death among the elderly. 

Water management experts study how much rainfall to anticipate so they can manage reservoir levels and water usage, to  ensure everyone has abundant water supplies.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - National Weather Service
          -  NOAA's Climate Prediction Center 

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Exhibit 31.2

                  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, BLAINE FROATS, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of AEC 1, Inc (the
"REGISTRANT");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "EVALUATION DATE"); and

(c) Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our required evaluation as of
the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

                                            BY: /S/ BLAINE FROATS
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            BLAINE FROATS

                                            Chief Executive Officer

Date: November 14, 2005
STATE v. William H. SUGGS, Jr.

No. 47P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of January 2005 by Defendant entitled "Notice of Appeal and Copies of Court Records":

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
STATE v. BOWENS.

No. COA04-921.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 19, 2005.

Certification Date May 9, 2005.

Appeal from Pitt (01CRS63335).

Case reported without published opinion. Vacated and remanded.
DIAZ v. DIVISION OF SOCIAL SERVICES.

No. 523PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 16, 2005.

Richard J. Votta, Assistant Attorney General, for Division of Social Services, et al.

Thomas E. Cone, Wendell H. Ott, Greensboro, for Diaz.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 14th day of March 2005 by Petitioner for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Allowed. Petitioner (Diaz) shall have up to and including the 4th day of May 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 16th day of March 2005."
STATE v. BOLTON

No. COA04-174.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed October 5, 2004.

Certification Date October 25, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Remand for resentencing.
carg-ex101_12.htm



Exhibit 10.1

 

Consulting Agreement

 

This Consulting Agreement is entered into as of April 1, 2019 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Oliver Chrzan (“you”) and CarGurus, Inc. (“CarGurus”).  

 


	
 
	
1.
	
Services. From the Effective Date until September 30, 2019 (the “Consulting Period”), you will provide training, advisory and consulting services to CarGurus (the “Services”) on an as-needed basis in a manner consistent with the standards you maintained when employed by CarGurus.  Your points of contact for the Services are Langley Steinert and Kyle Lomeli.  We do not expect that you will need or have access to any material, non-public information in connection with the Services.  CarGurus may terminate the Consulting Period early at its election.





	
 
	
2.
	
Fees. In consideration for the Services, you will be paid a fee of two hundred dollars ($200) for each Services hour, with a minimum of ten Services hours per full calendar month.  





	
 
	
3.
	
Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure.  You agree that the Nondisclosure, Developments and Non-Competition Agreement, dated March 12, 2008, between you and CarGurus (as successor in interest to CarGurus LLC) (the “NDA”) will remain in effect during the Consulting Period.





	
 
	
4.
	
General.  You agree that it is your responsibility to pay all related and applicable federal and state income tax withholding, social security taxes, and unemployment or disability insurance.  You acknowledge that you are an independent contractor and nothing in this Consulting Agreement shall be construed as a contract of employment between you and CarGurus. If any court of competent jurisdiction declares or determines any provision of this Consulting Agreement to be illegal or invalid, then the validity of the remaining parts, terms or provisions will not be affected.  This Consulting Agreement, together with the NDA, constitutes the entire understanding between you and CarGurus with respect to its subject matter.  This Consulting Agreement may be amended, modified or waived only in writing signed by both you and CarGurus.  This Consulting Agreement shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with, and the rights of the parties shall be determined by, the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, without application of conflict of law principles.  The state or federal courts located within the Commonwealth of Massachusetts shall have exclusive jurisdiction over any dispute arising out of this Consulting Agreement.




 


	
CARGURUS, INC.
	
 

	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Langley Steinert
	
 
	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ Oliver Chrzan

	
Name:
	
 
	
Langley Steinert
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Oliver Chrzan

	
Title:
	
 
	
Chief Executive Officer