alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Independent Auditors Report


To the Shareholders and Board of Trustees of the
Smith Barney Investment Series:

In planning and performing our audits of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Premier Selections All Cap Growth Portfolio,
Large Cap Core Portfolio, Growth and Income Portfolio and Smith
Barney Government Portfolio of the Smith Barney Investment Series
(Fund) for the year ended October 31, 2002, we considered their
internal control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, error or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in internal control that might be material
weaknesses under standards established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness is a
condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the
internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low
level the risk that errors or fraud in amounts that would be
material in relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees
in the normal course of performing their assigned functions.
However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its
operation, including controls for safeguarding securities that we
consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of October
31, 2002.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management and the Board of Trustees of the Fund and the
Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and
should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties.


                                                  KPMG LLP

New York, New York
December 11, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 494 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 494

 To provide for the conditional conveyance of any interest retained by 
 the United States in St. Joseph Memorial Hall in St. Joseph, Michigan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2007

  Mr. Upton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the conditional conveyance of any interest retained by 
 the United States in St. Joseph Memorial Hall in St. Joseph, Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF RETAINED INTEREST IN ST. JOSEPH MEMORIAL HALL.

    (a) In General.--Subject to the terms and conditions of subsection 
(c), the Administrator of General Services shall convey to the city of 
St. Joseph, Michigan, by quitclaim deed, any interest retained by the 
United States in St. Joseph Memorial Hall.
    (b) St. Joseph Memorial Hall.--In this section, the term ``St. 
Joseph Memorial Hall'' means the property subject to a conveyance from 
the Secretary of Commerce to the city of St. Joseph, Michigan, by 
Quitclaim Deed dated May 9, 1936, recorded in Liber 310, at page 404, 
in the Register of Deeds for Berrien County, Michigan.
    (c) Terms and Conditions.--The conveyance under subsection (a) is 
subject to the following terms and conditions:
            (1) Consideration.--As consideration for the conveyance 
        under subsection (a), the City of St. Joseph, Michigan, shall 
        pay $10,000.00 to the Untied States.
            (2) Additional terms and conditions.--The Administrator of 
        General Services may require such additional terms and 
        conditions to the conveyance under subsection (a) as the 
        Administrator considers appropriate to protect the interest of 
        the United States.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



GNC CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Exhibit 32.1 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GNC Corporation (the
Company), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Louis
Mancini, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David Heilman, as Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Louis Mancini

Name: Louis Mancini
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date: November 5, 2004/s/ David Heilman

Name: David Heilman
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date: November 5, 2004
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Page 44 of 44
# L_2016243EN.01001601.xml

| 10.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 243/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 243/16

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/466 of 31 March 2016 implementing Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 85 of 1 April 2016
  )

On pages 4 and 5, in the Annex (concerning Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44), the date ‘1.4.2016’ is inserted in the column ‘Date of Listing’ for entries 21, 22 and 23.

---
Horace Edward HOLLIS, Jr. v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 201P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

Horace Edward Hollis, Jr., Pro Se.

Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

***48*****ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 3rd day of May 2004 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Forsyth County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 24th day of June 2004."
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1513 

To revise the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military Park to include 

the Gettysburg Train Station and certain land along Plum Run in 

Cumberland Township, to limit the means by which property within 

such revised boundaries may be acquired, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 11, 2013 

Mr. PERRY (for himself, Mr. MARINO, Mr. BARLETTA, and Mr. GERLACH) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of the Gettysburg National Military 

Park to include the Gettysburg Train Station and certain 

land along Plum Run in Cumberland Township, to limit 

the means by which property within such revised boundaries may be acquired, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GETTYSBURG NATIONAL MILITARY PARK. 

4 (a) BOUNDARY REVISION.—Section 1 of the Act ti5 tled ‘‘An Act to revise the boundary of Gettysburg Na6 tional Military Park in the Commonwealth of Pennsyl7 vania, and for other purposes’’, approved August 17, 1990 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1513 IH

1 (16 U.S.C. 430g–4), is amended by adding at the end the 

2 following new subsection: 

3 ‘‘(d) ADDITIONAL LAND.— 

4 ‘‘(1) COVERED LAND; CONDITION.—In addition 

5 to the land identified in subsections (a) and (b), the 

6 park shall include the following, as depicted on the 

7 maps titled ‘Gettysburg National Military Park Pro8 posed Boundary Addition’, numbered 305/80,045, 

9 and dated January 2010, if the owner of the prop10 erty has provided written consent to inclusion: 

11 ‘‘(A) The land and interests in land com12 monly known as the ‘Gettysburg Train Station’ 

13 and its immediate surroundings in the Borough 

14 of Gettysburg. 

15 ‘‘(B) The land and interests in land lo16 cated along Plum Run in Cumberland Town17 ship. 

18 ‘‘(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in 

19 paragraph (1), the acquisition of property within the 

20 area described in such paragraph, or the manage21 ment plan for such acquired property shall be con22 strued to create buffer zones outside of such prop23 erty. That an activity or use can be seen or heard 

24 from within such acquired property shall not preVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:36 Apr 19, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1513.IH H1513

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1513 IH

1 clude the conduct of that activity or use outside such 

2 property.’’. 

3 (b) LIMITED ACQUISITION AUTHORITY.—Section 

4 2(a) of that Act (16 U.S.C. 430g–5(a)) is amended in the 

5 first sentence by inserting before the period the following: 

6 ‘‘, except that the Secretary is authorized to acquire prop7 erty within the area described in section 1(d) by donation 

8 only’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northwest Horizon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rick Cox, President and acting CFO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  December 13, 2004

By:  /s/ Rick Cox

Name: Rick Cox

Title:    President and Acting CFO
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Real Estate Fund XI, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the
undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General Partners of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of one of the General
Partners of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Leo F. Wells, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III      
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 23, 2009         



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Douglas P. Williams
|Douglas P. Williams    
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 23, 2009
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chardan China Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Li Zhang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


By: /s/ Li Zhang                                     Dated: November 7, 2005
    ---------------------------------------------
    Li Zhang
    Chief Financial Officer
    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
HomeOcean Facts

# How do natural disasters contribute to marine debris?

## The **high winds, heavy rains, storm surge, and flooding** associated with natural disasters can pull large structures and other articles into surrounding waters.

*Click on graphic to enlarge.*The Japan earthquake of 2011 and resulting tsunami  destroyed whole communities, pulling an estimated five million tons of debris  into the surrounding waters. | ** Having trouble reading this tiny text? Get a better view! Download this infographic.

Natural disasters such as hurricanes, tropical storms,  tsunamis, and landslides have the potential to generate a tremendous amount of marine debris. The high winds, heavy rains, storm surge, and flooding associated  with these disasters can pull large  structures, household articles, and outdoor items into surrounding waters. 

As seen in the wakes of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and  post-tropical cyclone Sandy, some debris remains in shallow waters, creating safety  hazards for people, obstructing navigation channels, and threatening natural  resources. Immediate action is needed to assess and remove the debris in order to maintain  navigation routes, ensure safe boating and recreational activities, and protect  sensitive ecosystems.

Strong tides and currents also carry the debris out to sea, where it may take months to years to reach land again. The Japan earthquake of 2011 and the resulting tsunami destroyed whole communities, creating an estimated five million tons of debris. Much of this debris remained along the coast of Japan, but a portion of it was washed into the Pacific Ocean. While some of the wreckage eventually sank to the ocean floor, debris from the disaster occasionally continues to appear on U.S. and Canadian shores.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

        - ** Download Infographic
        - Japanese Tsunami Marine Debris (audio podcast)
        - NOAA Marine Debris Program: Disaster Debris

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4801 

To extend the duty suspension on 4-(Cyclopropyl-α-hydroxymethylene)-3,5- 

dioxocylohexanecarboxylic acid, ethyl ester. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the duty suspension on 4-(Cyclopropyl-αhydroxymethylene)-3,5-dioxocylohexanecarboxylic acid, 

ethyl ester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 4-(CYCLOPROPYL-α-HYDROXYMETHYLENE)-3,5- 

4 DIOXOCYCLOHEXANECARBOXYLIC ACID, 

5 ETHYL ESTER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.29.93 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 4-(Cyclopropyl-α-hydroxymethylene)-3,5- 

9 dioxocyclohexanecarboxylic acid, ethyl ester is amended by 

10 striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and by inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4801 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
HomeOcean Facts

# What is a marine national monument?

## Similar to national  marine sanctuaries, marine national monuments are designated to protect areas  of the marine environment.

Coral and Ulua found in the Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument. Coral reefs found in Papahānaumokuākea are home to over 7,000 marine species, one quarter of which are found only in the Hawaiian Archipelago.

Marine monuments and national marine sanctuaries are both types of marine protected areas. The main difference between national  marine sanctuaries and marine national monuments is the designation process and  the laws under which they are established. Sanctuaries are designated by NOAA or Congress and are managed by NOAA using the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (NMSA). The NMSA requires extensive public process, local community  engagement, stakeholder involvement, and citizen participation, both prior to and  following designation.

The Office of National Marine Sanctuaries serves as the trustee for a network of underwater parks in marine and Great Lakes waters from Washington state to the Florida Keys, and from Lake Huron to American Samoa. This network includes a growing number of national marine sanctuaries and Papahānaumokuākea and Rose Atoll marine national monuments.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          -  Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument
          -  Rose Atoll Marine National Monument 
          -  Office of National Marine Sanctuaries
          -  NOAA Fisheries Marine National Monument Program

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Le'Ardrus BURRIS, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9420

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5085 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5085

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand expensing for 
                            small business.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2008

  Mr. Herger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand expensing for 
                            small business.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Expensing Temporary 
Expansion Act of 2008''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN EXPENSING FOR SMALL BUSINESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 179(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to dollar limitation) is amended by 
striking ``$125,000 in the case of taxable years beginning after 2006 
and before 2011'' and inserting ``$500,000 in the case of taxable years 
beginning after 2007 and before 2011''.
    (b) Phaseout of Limitation Only by 50 Percent of Excess Over 
$2,000,000.--Paragraph (2) of section 179(b) of such Code (relating to 
reduction in limitation) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Reduction in limitation.--The limitation under 
        paragraph (1) for any taxable year shall be reduced (but not 
        below zero) by the amount (one-half of such amount in the case 
        of taxable years beginning after 2007 and before 2011) by which 
        the cost of section 179 property placed in service during such 
        taxable year exceeds $200,000 ($2,000,000 in the case of 
        taxable years beginning after 2007 and before 2011).''.
    (c) Rebasing of Inflation Adjustments.--Section 179(b)(5)(A) of 
such Code (relating to inflation adjustments) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i) by striking ``2007 
        and before 2011, the $125,000 and $500,000'' and inserting 
        ``2008 and before 2011, the $500,000 and $2,000,000'', and
            (2) in clause (ii) by striking ``calendar year 2006'' and 
        inserting ``calendar year 2007''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service in taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 2007.
                                 <all>
```