alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Topics
3. Recreation
4. Every Kid Outdoors

Every Kid Outdoors Hey fourth graders! See America’s natural wonders and historic sites for free.


Every Kid Outdoors is a federal government effort to get every fourth grader in the nation into public lands and waters. The goal is to foster the next generation of environmental stewards and ocean guardians eager to enjoy America's natural treasures. Many NOAA locations provide ideal settings for visitors to experience hands-on activities that can inspire a sense of wonder and a thirst for knowledge about our special ocean, coastal, and Great Lakes places — and most NOAA public spaces and visitor centers offer free admission!  National Marine Sanctuaries
 Every Kid Outdoors
 Estuarine Research Reserves
  Explore NOAA Sanctuaries and Estuarine Research Reserves


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4984 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber tow. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2008 

Mrs. CUBIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain acrylic fiber 

tow. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN ACRYLIC FIBER TOW. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4984 IH

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Acrylic fiber tow 

(polyacrylonitrile tow) containing a minimum of 92 

percent acrylonitrile by 

weight, from 200 to 600 

ppm sodium and no organic 

solvent, the foregoing wound 

into spools each containing 

24,000 filaments and with 

average filament measuring 

1.3 decitex (plus or minus 

0.15) (provided for in subheading 5501.30.00) ............ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
ROMERO v. STAFFMARK.

No. COA04-535.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #962662).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Sea Level Rise Name:

Date:

Year | mm

1993 | 2.1

1994 | 6.0 60

1995 | 11.6

1996 [12.7 | 55

1997 | 18.3

1998 | 20.6

1999 | 21.2 | 50

2000 | 23.6

2001 | 29.7

20021336.) *

2003 | 36.2

2004 | 39.6 | 40

2005 | 44.4

2006 | 46.1

2007 | 46.5 | 35

2008 | 51.2

2009 [55.2 | 39
25
20
15
10
5

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUMERCINDO EVERISARIO

CUCHILLA-VENTURA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-72876

Agency No. A079-417-450

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 5, 2010** 

Before: RYMER, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Gumercindo Everisario Cuchilla-Ventura, a native and citizen of El

Salvador, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

FILED

APR 19 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-72876

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Don v. Gonzales, 476

F.3d 738, 741 (9th Cir. 2007), and we deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s adverse credibility determination

based on the discrepancies between Cuchilla-Ventura’s testimony and his sworn

statements during his airport interview as to why he came to the United States. See

Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962-63 (9th Cir. 2004) (when petitioner gives entirely

different reasons for arrival in United States, discrepancy between testimony and

sworn airport interview constitutes substantial evidence). Cuchilla-Ventura’s

contention that the agency failed to produce any evidence regarding the airport

interview is belied by the record. Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s

adverse credibility determination based on the discrepancies between CuchillaVentura’s testimony and his asylum application regarding the location of the

attacks he suffered in El Salvador. See id. Further, because the agency had reason

to question Cuchilla-Ventura’s credibility, Cuchilla-Ventura’s inability to

corroborate his membership in the church youth group undermines his claim. See

Sidhu v. INS, 220 F.3d 1085, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2000). Accordingly, in the absence

of credible testimony, Cuchilla-Ventura’s asylum and withholding of removal

claims fail. See Farah v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir. 2003).
3 07-72876

Because Cuchilla-Ventura’s CAT claim is based on the testimony the agency

found not credible, and there is no evidence in the record that compels a finding

that it is more likely than not he would be tortured if returned to El Salvador, his

CAT claim fails. See id. at 1156-57.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





I, Robert E. Cauley, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Bimini Capital Management, Inc. (the “Company”) in compliance 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that, the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) filed with the Sececuritied and Exchange Commission:





1.
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934











May 16, 2011

/s/ Robert E. CauleyRobert E. Cauley,

Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5063 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5063

        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acephate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2008

  Mr. Sestak introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Acephate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACEPHATE.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.25.68 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Acephate) is amended by 
striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4857 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4857

  To limit liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
  Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 for service station dealers 
   with respect to the release or threatened release of recycled oil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

Mr. Capuano (for himself, Mr. Barrett of South Carolina, Mr. Clay, Mr. 
  Doyle, Mr. Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. McGovern, Mr. 
Pascrell, Mr. Sessions, and Mr. Tiahrt) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
 addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To limit liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
  Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 for service station dealers 
   with respect to the release or threatened release of recycled oil.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AMENDMENT.

    Section 114(c) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9614(c)) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Prior to effective date.--No person (including the 
        United States or any State) may recover, under the authority of 
        subsection (a)(3) or (4) of section 107, from a service station 
        dealer for any response costs or damages resulting from a 
        release or threatened release of recycled oil, or use the 
        authority of section 106 against a service station dealer other 
        than a person described in subsection (a)(1) or (2) of section 
        107, with respect to any period between November 8, 1986, and 
        the effective date described in paragraph (4), if the service 
        station dealer had complied with all applicable laws and 
        regulations relating to the disposal of such oil.''.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                        140,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               140,800
<CGS>                                           80,008
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,008
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                92,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,577
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,834)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,136
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (35,933)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,704)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (37,985)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.34)


<FN>
(1) RESTATED FOR POOLING OF INTERESTS.
</FN>

</TABLE>
** EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John R. Miller, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company,LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. The registrant'sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting. 

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ John R. Miller                      |
|     |  | John R. Miller*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: July 10, 2006
Alice Corbett STAFFORD, Et vir. v. COUNTY OF BLADEN.

No. 197P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 24, 2004.

K. Edward Greene, Kathleen A. Naggs, Raleigh, Michelle F. Lynch, for Alice Corbett Stafford and William E. Stafford, Jr.

W. Leslie Johnson, Jr., Bladen County Attorney, J. Gates Harris, Red Springs, for Bladen County.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Plaintiffs on the 29th day of April 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 29th day of April 2004 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 24th day of June 2004."
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40661

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ, also known as Liborio Campuzano-Magana,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:13-CR-1161

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Luis Mendoza-Hernandez has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Mendoza-Hernandez has filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well 

as Mendoza-Hernandez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 30, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 14-40661 Document: 00513099698 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2015
No. 14-40661

2

the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

 Case: 14-40661 Document: 00513099698 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2015
Independent Auditors' Consent



To the Shareholders and Directors of
Municipal High Income Fund Inc.:

We consent to the use of our report dated December 10, 1996 incorporated 
herein by reference and to the references to our Firm under the headings 
"Financial Highlights" and "Independent Auditors" in the Prospectus and 
"Independent Public Accountants" in the Statement of Additional Information.
 



	KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


New York, New York
January 13, 1997
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5112 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain master cylinder 

assemblies for braking systems designed for use in hybrid vehicles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2008 

Mr. HULSHOF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain master cylinder assemblies for braking systems designed for 

use in hybrid vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN MASTER CYLINDER ASSEMBLIES FOR 

4 BRAKING SYSTEMS DESIGNED FOR USE IN 

5 HYBRID VEHICLES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.92 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 certain master cylinder assemblies for braking systems de9 signed for use in hybrid vehicles) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5112 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
KEGLEY, et al. v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE.

No. 342P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

July 29, 2004.

Robert E. Hornick, Jr., for Kegley, et al.

Anthony Fox, Charlotte, C. Wes Hodges, II, Wilmington, for City of Fayetteville.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 26th day of July 2004 by Respondent for Reconsideration:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 29th day of July 2004."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5007 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Resmethrin. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Resmethrin. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESMETHRIN. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.83 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

6 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

8 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

9 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

10 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS