alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the Matter of THE PETITION OF CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY Concerning the Allocation Formula for Corporate Income Tax Purposes for the Year Ended December 31, 1991. appealed by CENTRAL TELEPHONE COMPANY

No. 632P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Jasper L. Cummings, Jr., Raleigh, Paul H. Frankel, Craig B. Fields, New York, NY, Roberta Moseley Mero, for Central Telephone Co.

*204Kay Linn Miller Hobart, Assistant Attorney General, for E. Norris Tolson.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Petitioner (Central Telephone Company) on the 21st day of December 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Respondent's (Secretary of Revenue, Tolson), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 21st day of December 2004 by Petitioner in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."
# L_2016047EN.01000501.xml

| 24.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/5

---

DECISION (EU) 2016/252 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of 25 November 2015

on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund for the payment of advances

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (1), and in particular Article 4a(4) thereof,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2 December 2013 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management (2), and in particular point 11 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Union Solidarity Fund (the ‘Fund’) aims to enable the Union to respond in a rapid, efficient and flexible manner to emergency situations and to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Union Solidarity Fund (the ‘Fund’) aims to enable the Union to respond in a rapid, efficient and flexible manner to emergency situations and to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.

| (2) | The Fund is not to exceed a maximum amount of EUR 500 million (2011 prices), as laid down in Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Fund is not to exceed a maximum amount of EUR 500 million (2011 prices), as laid down in Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 (3).

| (3) | Article 4a(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 foresees that the Fund may be mobilised in an amount up to a maximum of EUR 50 000 000 for the payment of advances, and the corresponding appropriations entered into the general budget of the Union, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Article 4a(4) of Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 foresees that the Fund may be mobilised in an amount up to a maximum of EUR 50 000 000 for the payment of advances, and the corresponding appropriations entered into the general budget of the Union,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2016, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 50 000 000 in commitment and payment appropriations for the payment of advances.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Strasbourg, 25 November 2015.

For the European Parliament

The President

M. SCHULZ

For the Council

The President

N. SCHMIT

---

(1)  
  OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 3.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 373, 20.12.2013, p. 1.

2

(3)  Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 of 2 December 2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020 (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 884).

3

---
STATE v. Makeo REID.

No. 596P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Diane Martin Pomper, Assistant Attorney General, Peter S. Gilchrist, III, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of November 2004 by Defendant for Relief:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Endeavor Energy Resources, L.P.

,

Appellant

,

v.

Sandra H. Staley, Individually as

Independent Executrix of the Estate of

George G. Staley, Deceased, and as

Trustee of the Tax Free Trust for Sandra

H. Staley

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 1 4 6

- C V

Appeal from the

109 th District Court

of Winkler C ounty, Texas

(TC# 15,68 2

- B )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee ’ s motion to vacate the November 8, 2018 submission

and oral argument setting. The above styled and numbered cause will be rescheduled at a later

date.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27 th day of September , 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., R odriguez and Palafox

, J J.
STATE of North Carolina v. Baxter Linnell INGRAM.

No. 11P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Baxter Linnell Ingram, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 2nd day of January 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Davidson County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
STATE v. GREEN

No. COA03-1613

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed January 18, 2005

Certification Date February 7, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, James R. Fisher, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed thisQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bristol West Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a.               Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b.              Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c.               Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

 

a.               All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b.              Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  August 13, 2004           |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
| /s/  JAMES  R. FISHER       |   |
| James R. Fisher                       |
| Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,311,014
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,977,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                   329,802
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,525,998
<PP&E>                                       7,683,750
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,584,566
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,524,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,191,932
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        2,056,520
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,502
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,704,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,524,021
<SALES>                                      8,836,685
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,836,685
<CGS>                                       13,685,680
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,607,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (16,525,123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (16,525,123)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (16,525,123)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.48)
        

</TABLE>
Francis G. HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. Ronald DAVIS, Warden.

No. 19-6125

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5009 

To suspend temporarily the duty on s-Methoprene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2008 

Mrs. TAUSCHER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on s-Methoprene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. S-METHOPRENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Isopropyl (2E,4E)-(7S)-11- 

methoxy-3,7,11- 

trimethyldodeca-2,4-dienoate 

(CAS No. 65733–16–6) 

(provided for in subheading 

2918.99.5000) ..................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HR 5009 IH 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Daniel G. DURAIN, Petitioner v. FLORIDA.

No. 19-5832

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 4, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District denied.
Gwendolyn W. PHILLIPS v. Marilyn Owenby LEDFORD and George Richard Owenby, As Co-Administrators of the Estate of Benjamin Jay Owenby, and Marilyn Owenby Ledford, George Richard Owenby, Claudia Dianne Hendley, Dorothy Marie Shoff, Linda Gail Jones, Arthur Paul Barker, Timmy Barker, Ronnie Barker, Sandy Barker Fussell, Donnie Owenby, Lisa Owenby Setzer, as Heirs of the Estate of Benjamin Jay Owenby.

No. 59P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 6, 2004.

George B. Hyler, Asheville, Robert J. Lopez, for Phillips.

John Michael Lloyd, for Ledford et al.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by Plaintiff on the 10th day of February 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30 (substantial constitutional question), the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the notice of appeal is

> "Dismissed Ex Mero Motu by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of February 2004 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals *134pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of May 2004."
O & M INDUSTRIES v. SMITH ENGINEERING CO., a/k/a Smith Environmental Corporation; Kurz Transfer Products, L.P. and Kurz & Partners, L.P.

No. 502PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Matthew H. Bryant, Winston-Salem, for O & M Industries.

Michael Knapp, Rolly L. Chambers, Charlotte, for Kurz Transfer Products.

*695*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the conditional petition filed on the 5th day of October 2004 by Defendant (Kurz Transfer Products) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
WINGFIELD v. NORTH CAROLINA CENT. UNIVERSITY.

No. COA03-1221.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed September 7, 2004.

Certification Date September 27, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
IN RE S.M.W.

No. COA04-204.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Rowan, (98J179).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE v. John Marvin TRENT.

No. 520A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 30, 2004.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, Joel H. Brewer, District Attorney, for State of NC.

Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, for Trent.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 30th day of November 2004 by Defendant for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Defendant (John Marvin Trent) shall have up to and including the 3rd day of January 2005 to file and serve his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 30th day of November 2004."
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial OfficerRequired by Rule 13a-14(a) (17 CFR 240.13a-14(a))**

 

I, Terrence C. Kearney, certify that:

 

1.  I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hospira, Inc. (“Hospira”);

 

2.  Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of Hospira as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4.  Hospira’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for Hospira and have:

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to Hospira, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of Hospira’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in Hospira’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during Hospira’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Hospira’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and

 

5.  Hospira’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Hospira’s auditorsand the audit and public policy committee of Hospira’s board of directors:

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect Hospira’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in Hospira’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:   August 12, 2004 | /s/  Terrence  C. Kearney                                                   |   |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                              | Terrence C. Kearney, Senior Vice President,  Finance and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September                30, 2006 , fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)                or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                      |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending September 30, 2006 , fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                Effective Profitable Software, Inc. |

*/s/      Gary Moore*
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned in his capacity
as an officer of Fremont Michigan InsuraCorp, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:



|1. | The accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                                                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard E. Dunning                                                                  
|                      |  |  |  | Richard E. Dunning, President and Chief Executive Officer                               
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Kevin G. Kaastra                                                                    
|                      |  |  |  | Kevin G. Kaastra, Vice President of Finance (principal financial and accounting officer)

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
general incorporation language in such filing.



35