alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |                                                                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                                                                                                                 |
| May                15, 2006  | /s/                TODD B. PARRIOTT                                                                                  |
|                              | Todd                B. Parriott,                                                                                     |
|                              | Chairman                of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Investment                Officer |
|                              |                                                                                                                 |
|                              |                                                                                                                 |
| May                15, 2006  | /s/                JONATHAN G. ARENS                                                                                 |
|                              | Jonathan                G. Arens                                                                                     |
|                              | Chief                Financial Officer                                                                               |
WHITAKER v. WHITAKER.

No. COA04-10.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed March 15, 2005.

Certification Date April 4, 2005.

Appeal from the Forsyth (02CVS1327).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
Randall MATHENA, Warden, Petitioner v. Lee Boyd MALVO

No. 18-217

Supreme Court of the United States.

September 11, 2019

Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as *amicus curiae* and for divided argument granted.
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30345 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. RASHAD DARNELL SMITH, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana No. 1:04-CR-10001-3

Before SMITH, STEWART, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D January 30, 2009 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-30345

2 Rashad Smith, federal prisoner # 22424-009, challenges his sentence. He previously moved to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court dismissed that motion with prejudice, and Smith did not seek a certificate of appealability. He then filed a motion for writ ofcoram nobis in the district court challenging the calculation of his sentence under the sentencing guidelines and claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The district court denied the motion on the merits. Because thewrit ofcoram nobis is not availablewhile Smith is in custody,
see United States v. Castro, 26 F.3d 557, 559 (5th Cir. 1994), his pro se motion should have been treated as a motion under § 2255. Before filing a successive motion pursuant to § 2255, Smith was required to obtain leave from this court. 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A). This requirement “acts as a jurisdictional bar to the district court’s asserting jurisdiction over any successive habeas petition until this court has granted the petitioner permission to file one.” U nited States v. Key, 205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir. 2000). We must satisfy ourselves of our own jurisdiction and that ofthe district
court. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 95 (1998). Because the district court lacked jurisdiction to rule on Smith’s motion, our jurisdiction extends not to the merits ofthe appeal, but merely for the purpose ofcorrecting thejurisdictional error. See New York Life Ins. Co. v. Deshotel , 142 F.3d 873, 883 (5th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, we VACATE the judgment and DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4998 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures of methyl 4-iodo2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)ureidosulfonyl] benzoate, sodium salt (Iodosulfuron methyl, sodium salt) and application adjuvants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 16, 2008 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on mixtures 

of methyl 4-iodo-2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin2-yl)ureidosulfonyl] benzoate, sodium salt (Iodosulfuron 

methyl, sodium salt) and application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4998 IH

1 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF METHYL 4-IODO-2-[3-(4-METHOXY2 6-METHYL-1,3,5-TRIAZIN-2- 

3 YL)UREIDOSULFONYL] BENZOATE, SODIUM 

4 SALT (IODOSULFURON METHYL, SODIUM 

5 SALT) AND APPLICATION ADJUVANTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.44 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 mixtures of methyl 4-iodo-2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5- 

9 triazin-2-yl)ureidosulfonyl] benzoate, sodium salt (Iodosul10 furon methyl, sodium salt) and application adjuvants) is 

11 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

12 2011’’. 

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

14 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

15 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# L_2016358EN.01000201.xml

| 29.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 358/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 358/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU, Euratom) 2016/2392

of 19 December 2016

appointing a member of the Court of Auditors

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to the proposal by the Republic of Estonia,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | The term of office of Ms Kersti KALJULAID expired on 6 May 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The term of office of Ms Kersti KALJULAID expired on 6 May 2016.

| (2) | A new appointment should therefore be made, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A new appointment should therefore be made,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Juhan PARTS is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2022.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2016.

For the Council

The President

L. SÓLYMOS

---

(1)  Opinion of 14 December 2016 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

PHARMACOPEIA, INC.

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacopeia, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BrianM. Posner, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (PrincipalFinancial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) of the Company, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Brian M.  Posner                                        |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Brian M. Posner                                             |
|   | Executive Vice  President,                                  |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer and Treasurer                      |
|   | (Principal  Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) |
|   | November 5, 2007                                            |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Jonathan G. Arens, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Desert Capital REIT, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 16, 2005 /s/ JONATHAN G. ARENSJonathan G. ArensChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Castle Dental Centers, Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “***Report***”), I, Joseph P. Keane, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

 

(3) A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

Dated: March 30, 2004
An official website of the United States government.								Here's how you know we're official.				

##### dot gov icon**Official websites use .gov**

A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

##### https icon**Secure websites use HTTPS**

A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

National Ocean ServiceNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

              -  Home 
              -  Ocean Facts 
              -  TOPICS ****                  - Explore All Topics
                - Careers
                - Economy
                - Ecosystems
                - Geodesy
                - Hazards
                - Navigation
                - Observations
                - Ocean
                - Recreation
                - Sea Level Rise 
                - Story Maps
                - Tools 
              -  Education 
              -  News 
              -  Podcasts 
              -  Video 
              -  Images 
              -  About Us 

HomeEducationCoralsHow Do Stony Corals Grow?

# Table Corals

Branching Coral | Pillar Coral | **Table Corals** | Elkhorn Coral | Foliase Coral | Encrusting Coral | Massive Coral | Mushroom Coral

Corals that form broad  horizontal surfaces are commonly called table corals. This pattern of   growth increases the exposed surface area of the coral to the water   column. Polyps are provided greater access to light for their   zooxanthellae and it is easier for them to feed on zooplankton with   their tentacles.

### Corals Lessons

              - Welcome
              - What are Corals?
              - Zooxanthellae What's That?
              - How Do Stony Corals Grow?
              - How Do Coral Reefs Form?
              - Where Are Coral Reefs Found?
              - How Do Corals Reproduce?
              - Importance of Coral Reefs
              - Natural Threats to Coral Reefs
              - Anthropogenic Threats to Corals
              - Coral Diseases
              - Protecting Coral Reefs
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources 
              - Subject Review (PDF)

----

National Science Teaching Association (NSTA)

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Nekebwe SUPERVILLE, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-617

Supreme Court of the United States.

December 16, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Leander DUBAR.

No. 378P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Lisa Miles, for Leander Dubar.

A. Danielle Marquis, Special Deputy Attorney General, John Carriker, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 28th day of July 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



STOCKHOLDERS’ AGREEMENT WAIVER
July 23, 2019


Q-Jagged Peak Energy Investment Partners, LLC
1401 McKinney Street, Suite 2700
Houston, TX 77010
Attention: General Counsel


Gentlemen:
Reference is made to that certain Stockholders’ Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2017, by and among Jagged Peak Energy Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Q-Jagged Peak Energy Investment Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Q-Jagged Peak”), JPE Management Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and the individuals and entities listed on the signature pages thereto, as such may be amended from time to time (the “Stockholders’ Agreement”).  Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Stockholders’ Agreement.
Pursuant to the Stockholders’ Agreement, Q-Jagged Peak currently has the right to designate at least a majority of the Board.  The Board currently consists of nine (9) directors, five (5) of which were designated by Q-Jagged Peak (Messrs. VanLoh, Davidson, Linn, Verma, and Webster).  The Board has determined that it would like increase the size of the Board to ten (10) members and elect Adrianna C. Ma to serve as an independent director to fill the newly created vacancy.  By signing below, Q-Jagged Peak waives its right to elect a majority of the Board for the sole purpose of Ms. Ma’s election as an independent director.  Q-Jagged Peak expressly reserves all of its rights and remedies under the Stockholders’ Agreement.  Nothing in this waiver shall constitute a waiver or relinquishment of any of the agreements, terms or conditions contained in the Stockholders’ Agreement except as expressly stated herein.




Very truly yours,






By:  /s/ James J. Kleckner    
Name:  James J. Kleckner
Title: President & Chief Executive Officer




Accepted and agreed:


Q-JAGGED PEAK ENERGY INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC






By:  James V. Baird    
Name: James V. Baird
Title: Authorized Person
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**787 CA 14-02268**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

TODD D. COOK AND LAURA L. COOK, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

SUSAN E. HILL, AS TRUSTEE OF THE SUSAN E. HILL REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, CURTISS R. HILL, AS TRUSTEE OF THE CURTISS R. HILL REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST, MARC J. HAAS, BETSEY K. HASS, TIMOTHY D. FOURNIER, SUSAN A. FOURNIER, PATRICIA R. DAVIS, RICHARD K. WHITMORE, AS TRUSTEE OF THE YVONNE S. WHITMORE QUALIFIED PERSONAL RESIDENCE TRUST (CANANDAIGUA) U/A DATED AUGUST 1, 2005, ROBERT URLAUB, THOMAS URLAUB, ALLISON DIMARCO, AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE LOWELL B. URLAUB AND MARY B. URLAUB TRUST U/A DATED DECEMBER 31, 2012, BRUCE D. PATT, TRUDIE A. KIRSHNER, MARGARET D. ALDRIDGE, SUSAN W. LOWELL, THEODORE L. LENZ, BELINDA A. LENZ, GEORGE W. KARPUS, KATHLEEN P. KARPUS, THEODORE G. LENZ AND KAREN B. LENZ, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

HARTER SECREST & EMERY LLP, ROCHESTER (JERAULD E. BRYDGES OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-RESPONDENTS.

BOND, SCHOENECK & KING, PLLC, ROCHESTER (KARL S. ESSLER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Ontario County (William F. Kocher, A.J.), entered October 15, 2014. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of plaintiffs and the cross motion of defendants-respondents for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: June 12, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
STATE v. WASHINGTON

No. COA03-1522

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed January 18, 2005

Certification Date February 7, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

1 June 2004

(2004/C 147/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
Dismissed and Opinion Filed April 19, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01465-CV 

HHRCD, LLC AND MARK CROSSLIN, Appellants 

V. 

D ANDI N ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellee 

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14474 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Fillmore, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Francis 

Before the Court is the parties’ joint agreed motion to dismiss the appeal based on 

settlement. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2). 

 

171465F.P05 

 

/Molly Francis/ 

MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE 
 –2– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

HHRCD, LLC AND MARK CROSSLIN, 

Appellants 

No. 05-17-01465-CV V. 

D ANDI N ENTERPRISES, INC., 

Appellee 

 On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-14474. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, 

Justices Fillmore and Whitehill 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

 As per the parties’ agreement, we ORDER each party bear its own costs of this appeal. 

Judgment entered April 19, 2018.