alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016038EN.01000101.xml

| 13.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 38/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 38/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/189

of 3 February 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Dalmatinski pršut (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Dalmatinski pršut’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia's application to register the name ‘Dalmatinski pršut’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Dalmatinski pršut’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Dalmatinski pršut’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Dalmatinski pršut’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.2. — Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 323, 1.10.2015, p. 7.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
Lawrence G. HUTCHINS, III, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-489

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 18, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Paladin Realty
Income Properties, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certifies, to her knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Whitney A. Greaves               
|                                     
|Whitney A. Greaves                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        

November 13, 2009
General Earl Rudder 

Commissioner 

General Land Office 

Austin 14, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Opinion No. WW-337 

Re: Whether final judgment cancelling land transactions 

under the Veterans Land 

Program restored rights of 

veterans involved to partlcipate in said program. 

The State of Texas brought suit to s&t aside the 

purchase and sale under the Veterans Land Program of a block 

of land in Zavala County because of certain fraudulent misrepresentations allegedly made by the promoters to the State 

and to some of the veteran purchasers. All veteran purchasers 

of land in the block were made parties defendant to the State's 

suit, and the final judgment therein provided that the State 

recover judgment "rescinding and holding void and of no force 

and effeot from the beginning" the various applications, contracts and deeds by which the Veterans Land transactions in 

question were consummated. The judgment further provided that 

all right, title and Interest In the lands involved were dlvested out of the defendants and vested In the original owners 

"in fee simple as if said title had never passed out of said 

defendants". Your letter requests our opinion a8 to whether 

such judgment restores the rights of the various veteran defendants in said suit to participate in the Veterans Land Program. 

Section 13 of the Veterans Land Act, Article 5421m, 

v.c.s provides that "no veteran shall be permitted by the 

Board 'to purchase more than one (1) tract of land under this 

Act;~'and once such veteran has obtained the benefits to be 

derived hereunder, he will not be permitted to apply again for 

such benefits". 

We think It clear that the evident intent of the 

judgment aforesaid was to effect a cancellation of the original 

land transactions at the instance of the State. In declaring 

same to be void from the beginning, we think the court intended 

that the veterans involved should be in the same position as 

if the transactions in question had never occurred. 
General Earl Rudder, page 2 (w-337) 

RThat which ia void is without vitality or legal 

effect.' Slaughter v. Quails, 139 Tex. 340, 162 S.W.2d 671, 

674 (1942). That being true, the veterans involved are considered as never having made the purchases In question, and 

they are therefore privileged to participate in the Veterans 

Land Program the same as If such events had never occurred. 

We answer your question in the affirmative. 

SUMMARY 

A final judgment of the court cancelling 

a Veterans Land transaction and providing 

that same was void from the beginning restores the right of the veterans Involved 

to participate in the program. 

Very truly yours, 

WILL WILSON 

Attorney General of Texas 

6 

BY N -wpJ 

Arthur Sandlin 

Assistant 

JAS:dhs 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTRR: 

ffeo. P. Blackburn, Chairman 

W. V. Geppert 

Milton Rlahardson 

J. 6. Davis, Jr. 

RRVIEWEDF'ORTRRATTORNRY GENERAL 

BY: 

James N. Ludlum
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Facts
3. What is upwelling?

**What is upwelling?**  Upwelling is a process in which **deep, cold water rises** toward the surface. illustration of upwelling*This graphic shows how displaced surface waters are replaced by cold, nutrient-rich water that “wells up” from below. Conditions are optimal for upwelling along the coast when winds blow along the shore.* Winds blowing across the ocean surface push water away. Water  then rises up from beneath the surface to replace the water that was pushed  away. This process is known as “upwelling.” Upwelling occurs in the open ocean and along coastlines. The  reverse process, called “downwelling,” also occurs when wind causes surface  water to build up along a coastline and the surface water eventually sinks  toward the bottom. Water that rises to the surface as a result of upwelling is  typically colder and is rich in nutrients. These nutrients “fertilize” surface  waters, meaning that these surface waters often have high biological  productivity.  Therefore, good fishing  grounds typically are found where upwelling is common.
 More **Information** Ocean Explorer: Upwelling Coastal Currents and Upwelling   Get **Social** Social
 **Last updated:** 01/20/23 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
HASSAN ANAWARUL, Petitioner,
v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. Nos. 08-72747 09-74072 Agency No. A070-914-854
MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Argued and Submitted May 8, 2013 Pasadena, California Before: O’SCANNLAIN, PAEZ, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. Anawarul Hassan, a native and citizen of Bangladesh, petitions for review of two decisions of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). The first dismissed his appeal of an Immigration Judge’s denial of Hassan’s first untimely motion to reopen. The second denied Hassan’s sec ond untimely motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction over his petitions under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). The denial of a motion 

# FILED
MAY 15 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALSto reopen is reviewed for abuse of discretion. Cano-Merida v. INS , 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002). The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Hassan’s motions to reopen where the motions were filed more than tw elve years after the order of removal and Hassan has failed to demonstrate changed country conditions in Bangladesh. 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(7); see also 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2, 1003.23. To the extent Hassan argues that th ere were changed country conditions because his marriage to Shira Hussain rende rs him a member of a particular social group, he did not exhaust this claim befo re the BIA and we have no jurisdiction to review it. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1). PETITIONS FOR REVIEW DENIED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5088 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5088

   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain laundry work surfaces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 22, 2008

Mr. Jordan of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on certain laundry work surfaces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN LAUNDRY WORK SURFACES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00       Laundry work        Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/ ''.
                          surfaces, each                                                     31/2011.......
                          constructed of
                          molded plastics,
                          having a rubber
                          mat and backguard
                          supply tray,
                          designed for
                          placement on a
                          clothes washing
                          machine and
                          clothes dryer
                          (provided for in
                          subheading
                          3924.90.56)   ...

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4763 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on under the counter mounting 

electric can openers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2007 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on under the 

counter mounting electric can openers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UNDER THE COUNTER MOUNTING ELECTRIC 

4 CAN OPENERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.48 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies with respect to goods entered, or 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HR 4763 IH

1 withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 

2 the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
STATE v. McTAGGART

No. COA04-1190

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from Cherokee (03CRS2432).

Case without published opinion. Vacated and remanded for a new trial.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5077 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5077

               To extend the suspension of duty on TSME.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2008

Mr. Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
               To extend the suspension of duty on TSME.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TSME.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.11.85 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to ortho/para-Toluenesulfonic 
acid, methyl ester (TSME)) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of AT&S Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard G. Honan,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350,
      that:





·


The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





·


The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
       August 15, 2006








//s//
      Richard G. Honan


------------------------


Richard
      G. Honan,


Chief
      Executive Officer
# L_2016055EN.01000301.xml

| 2.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 55/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 55/3

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/292

of 19 February 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Alheira de Mirandela (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Portugal's application to register the name ‘Alheira de Mirandela’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Portugal's application to register the name ‘Alheira de Mirandela’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Alheira de Mirandela’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Alheira de Mirandela’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Alheira de Mirandela’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name referred to in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 1.2 Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.) of Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 February 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 333, 9.10.2015, p. 8.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
**EXHIBIT32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

     In connectionwith the Quarterly Report of National Beef Packing Company, LLC (the Company)on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 28, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John R. Miller, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

     (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

     (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ John R. Miller                      |
|     |  | John R. Miller*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: July 11, 2005
STATE of North Carolina v. Durland PARRISH.

No. 572P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Durland Parrish, Pro Se.

Q. Shante Martin, Associate Attorney General, John Carriker, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of November 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."