Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2022 / Notices 38063 

10See Order. 

1See Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from 

the Republic of Korea: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017– 

2018, 85 FR 71055 (November 6, 2020) (Final 

Results), and accompanying Issues and Decision 

Memorandum (IDM). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

covered in this review will be equal to 

the weighted-average dumping margin 

that is established in the final results of 

this review, except if the rate is less 

than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de 

minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

companies not listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the company 

participated; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, or the 

original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) 

investigation, but the manufacturer is, 

the cash deposit rate will be the cash 

deposit rate established for the most 

recently completed segment for the 

producer of the subject merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 4.38 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the LTFV investigation.10

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: June 17, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Margin Calculations 

IV. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Differential Pricing 

Methodology 

Comment 2: Hyundai Steel’s Constructed 

Export Price (CEP) Offset Claim 

Comment 3: Hyundai Steel’s U.S. Dollar 

Short-Term Interest Rate 

Comment 4: SeAH’s Ministerial Error 

Allegations 

Comment 5: Other SeAH Issues 

V. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Review Receiving the ReviewSpecific Rate 

1. AJU BESTEEL Co., Ltd. 

2. BDP International, Inc. 

3. Daewoo International Corporation 

4. Dong Yang Steel Pipe 

5. Dongbu Incheon Steel Co. 

6. Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. 

7. Dongkuk Steel Mill 

8. EEW Korea Co., Ltd. 

9. Husteel Co., Ltd. 

10. Hyundai RB Co. Ltd. 

11. Kelly Pipe Co., LLC 

12. Keonwoo Metals Co., Ltd. 

13. Kolon Global Corp. 

14. Korea Cast Iron Pipe Ind. Co., Ltd. 

15. Kurvers Piping Italy S.R.L. 

16. Miju Steel MFG Co., Ltd. 

17. MSTEEL Co., Ltd. 

18. NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. 

19. Poongsan Valinox (Valtimet Division) 

20. POSCO 

21. POSCO Daewoo 

22. R&R Trading Co. Ltd. 

23. Sam Kang M&T Co., Ltd. 

24. Sin Sung Metal Co., Ltd. 

25. SK Networks 

26. Soon-Hong Trading Company 

27. Steel Flower Co., Ltd. 

28. TGS Pipe 

29. Tokyo Engineering Korea Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2022–13664 Filed 6–24–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–809] 

Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe 

From the Republic of Korea: Notice of 

Court Decision Not in Harmony With 

the Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; Notice of 

Amended Final Results 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 16, 2022, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

issued its final judgment in Nexteel Co., 

Ltd., et al. v. United States, Consol. 

Court no. 20–03868, sustaining the U.S. 

Department of Commerce (Commerce)’s 

first remand results pertaining to the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on 

circular welded non-alloy steel pipe 

(CWP) from the Republic of Korea 

(Korea) covering the period November 1, 

2017, through October 31, 2018. 

Commerce is notifying the public that 

the CIT’s final judgment is not in 

harmony with Commerce’s final results 

of the administrative review, and that 

Commerce is amending the final results 

with respect to the dumping margin 

assigned to Nexteel Co., Ltd., SeAh Steel 

Corporation, and Hyundai Steel 

Company. 

DATES: Applicable June 27, 2022. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dusten Hom, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 5075. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 6, 2020, Commerce 

published its Final Results in the 2017– 

2018 AD administrative review of CWP 

from Korea.1 Commerce determined in 

the Final Results that a particular 

market situation (PMS) existed with 

respect to the respondents’ purchases of 

hot-rolled coil (HRC), the primary input 

for the production of subject 

merchandise, and, accordingly, we 

made an adjustment to the cost of 

production for the purposes calculating 

normal value when based upon home 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1
38064 Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 122 / Monday, June 27, 2022 / Notices 

2See Final Results IDM at Comment 1. 

3See Nexteel Co., Ltd., et al. v. United States, 

Consol. Court No. 20–03868, Slip Op. 21–132 (CIT 

September 27, 2021). 

4See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Order Nexteel Co., Ltd., et al. v. United 

States, Court No. 20–03868, Slip Op. 21–132 (CIT 

September 27, 2021), dated October 29, 2021. 

5See Nexteel Co., Ltd., et al. v. United States, 

Consol. Court No. 20–03868, Slip Op. 22–69 (CIT 

June 16, 2022). 

6See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 

(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 

7See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers 

Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 

2010) (Diamond Sawblades). 8See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

market sales and for the purposes of the 

sales-below-cost test.2

Nexteel Co., Ltd., Hyundai Steel 

Company, and SeAh Steel Corporation 

appealed Commerce’s Final Results. On 

September 27, 2021, the CIT remanded 

the Final Results to Commerce, holding 

that Commerce is not permitted to make 

a PMS adjustment to the cost of 

production as an alternative calculation 

methodology when using normal value 

based on home market sales, and that 

Commerce cannot adjust cost of 

production for purposes of the salesbelow-cost test.3

In its final remand redetermination, 

issued in October 2021, Commerce 

removed the PMS adjustment when 

calculating its dumping margin but 

continued to find that a PMS existed in 

Korea for HRC during the period of 

review.4 The CIT sustained Commerce’s 

final redetermination.5

Timken Notice 

In its decision in Timken,6 as clarified 

by Diamond Sawblades,7 the U.S Court 

of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held 

that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act), Commerce must publish a 

notice of court decision that is not ‘‘in 

harmony’’ with a Commerce 

determination and must suspend 

liquidation of entries pending a 

‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s 

June 16, 2022, judgment constitutes a 

final decision of the CIT that is not in 

harmony with Commerce’s Final 

Results. Thus, this notice is published 

in fulfillment of the publication 

requirements of Timken. 

Amended Final Results 

Because there is now a final court 

judgment, Commerce is amending its 

Final Results with respect to mandatory 

respondent Nexteel Co., Ltd., and the 

non-examined companies (SeAh Steel 

Corporation and Hyundai Steel 

Company) as follows: 

Company 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Nexteel Co., Ltd .......................... 1.63 

Non-Examined Companies 

(SeAH Steel Corporation and 

Hyundai Steel Company) ........ 2.35 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Because Nexteel Co., Ltd., SeAh Steel 

Corporation, and Hyundai Steel 

Company have superseding cash deposit 

rates, i.e., there have been final results 

published in a subsequent 

administrative review, we will not issue 

revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP). 

This notice will not affect the current 

cash deposit rate. 

Liquidation of Suspended Entries 

At this time, Commerce remains 

enjoined by CIT order from liquidating 

entries that: were produced and/or 

exported by Nexteel Co., Ltd., Hyundai 

Steel Company, and SeAh Steel 

Corporation, and were entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption during the period 

November 1, 2017, through October 31, 

2018. These entries will remain 

enjoined pursuant to the terms of the 

injunction during the pendency of any 

appeals process. 

In the event the CIT’s ruling is not 

appealed, or, if appealed, upheld by a 

final and conclusive court decision, 

Commerce intends to instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on 

unliquidated entries of subject 

merchandise produced and/or exported 

by Nexteel Co., Ltd., Hyundai Steel 

Company, and SeAh Steel Corporation 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). 

We will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review when the 

importer-specific ad valorem 

assessment rate is not zero or de 

minimis. Where an import-specific ad 

valorem assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis,8 we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 516A(c) and 

(e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

Dated: June 22, 2022. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2022–13774 Filed 6–24–22; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology 

National Conference on Weights and 

Measures 107th Annual Meeting 

AGENCY: National Institute of Standards 

and Technology, Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The 107th Annual Meeting of 

the National Conference on Weights and 

Measures (NCWM) will be held in 

Tacoma, Washington from Sunday, July 

10, 2022, through Thursday, July 14, 

2022. This notice contains information 

about significant items on the NCWM 

Committee agendas but does not include 

all agenda items. As a result, the items 

are not consecutively numbered. 

DATES: The 2022 Annual Meeting will 

be held from Sunday, July 10, 2022, 

through Thursday, July 14, 2022. The 

meeting schedule is available on the 

NCWM website at www.ncwm.com. 

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held at 

the Hotel Murano, 1320 Broadway 

Tacoma, Washington 98402. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. 

Katrice Lippa, NIST, Office of Weights 

and Measures, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 

2600, Gaithersburg, MD 20899–2600. 

You may also contact Dr. Lippa at (301) 

975–3116 or by email at katrice.lippa@

nist.gov. The meeting is open to the 

public, but the payment of a registration 

fee is required. Please see the NCWM 

website (www.ncwm.com) to view the 

meeting agendas, registration forms, and 

hotel reservation information. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Publication of this notice on the 

NCWM’s behalf is undertaken as a 

public service and does not itself 

constitute an endorsement by the 

National Institute of Standards and 

Technology (NIST) of the content of the 

notice. NIST participates in the NCWM 

as an NCWM member and pursuant to 

15 U.S.C. 272(b)(10) and (c)(4) and in 

accordance with Federal policy (e.g., 

OMB Circular A–119 ‘‘Federal 

Participation in the Development and 

Use of Voluntary Consensus 

Standards’’). 

The NCWM is an organization of 

weights and measures officials of the 

states, counties, and cities of the United 

States, and representatives from the 


jspears on DSK121TN23PROD with NOTICES1