alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4948 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4948

   To extend the duty suspension on Crotonaldehyde (2-butenaldehyde).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 15, 2008

 Mr. David Davis of Tennessee introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the duty suspension on Crotonaldehyde (2-butenaldehyde).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CROTONALDEHYDE (2-BUTENALDEHYDE).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.10.44 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Crotonaldehyde (2-
butenaldehyde)) is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting 
``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the date that is 15 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. PAULINO.

No. COA04-749.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Guilford, (02CR099689, 02CR099690, 02CR099691, 02CR099692, 02CR099693, 02CR099694, 02CR099695, 02CR099696, 02CR099697).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
STATE of North Carolina v. Tyrone JOHNSON.

No. 53P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 4, 2004.

Rudolph A. Ashton, III, for Johnson.

David N. Kirkman, Assistant Attorney General, W. Robert Caudle, II, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of February 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of March 2004."
STATE of North Carolina v. James Carey WOOD.

No. 295P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

E. Clarke Dummit, Winston-Salem, for James Carey Wood.

Patricia Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 17th day of June 2004 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the Attorney General, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

> "Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 17th day of June 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4990 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 4990

  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to include all public 
 clinics for the distribution of pediatric vaccines under the Medicaid 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2008

Mr. Waxman (for himself and Ms. Roybal-Allard) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to include all public 
 clinics for the distribution of pediatric vaccines under the Medicaid 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vaccines for Children Access Act of 
2008''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF ALL PUBLIC CLINICS FOR DISTRIBUTION OF PEDIATRIC 
              VACCINES UNDER MEDICAID.

    Section 1928(b)(2)(A)(iii)(I) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1396s(b)(2)(A)(iii)(I)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or a rural health clinic'' and inserting 
        ``, a rural health clinic''; and
            (2) by inserting ``or a public health clinic,'' after 
        ``1905(l)(1)),''.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. ROBINSON.

No. COA04-948.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Henderson, (03CRS2147, 03CRS56186, 03CRS56203, 03CRS56185).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1197 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1197

   To waive the arbitrage rules for certain bonds issued in 1990 and 
                      partially defeased in 1996.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2013

   Mr. Ross introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To waive the arbitrage rules for certain bonds issued in 1990 and 
                      partially defeased in 1996.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF ARBITRAGE RULES FOR CERTAIN BONDS.

    (a) In General.--Section 148 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
shall not apply to an issue of bonds that were partially defeased, 
described in subsection (b), if--
            (1) such bonds are redeemed by the governmental unit that 
        issued them within 90 days of the sale of the escrow 
        securities, and
            (2) any net profit remaining after the proceeds of the sale 
        of the escrow securities have been applied to such redemption 
        is used by the issuer for an essential governmental function 
        within twelve months of such redemption.
    (b) Bonds Described.--Bonds described in this subsection are bonds 
issued on January 4, 1990, that were partially defeased on July 19, 
1996, with revenues of a municipally owned electric and water system.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.01

               CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                SCHEDULE II -- VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                            (In thousands of dollars)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                           Balance at      Charges to                                 Balance at
                                          Beginning of       Profit                                      End
                Description                  Period         and Loss       Other      Write-Offs      of Period
                -----------                  ------         --------       -----      ----------      ---------
<S>                                       <C>              <C>             <C>        <C>             <C>   
Year ended May 31, 1997
   Allowance for doubtful accounts           $4,824          $2,798         $  --       $   (878)       $6,744
                                             ======          ======         =====       =========       ======

Year ended May 31, 1996
   Allowance for doubtful accounts           $4,202          $ 974          $  --       $   (352)       $4,824
                                             ======          =====          =====       =========       ======

Year ended May 31, 1995
   Allowance for doubtful accounts           $8,950          $ 906          $  --       $ (5,654)       $4,202
                                             ======          =====          =====       =========       ======
</TABLE>
Peter WOODLEY, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES

No. 19-7106

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5085 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand expensing for 

small business. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2008 

Mr. HERGER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand 

expensing for small business. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Ex5 pensing Temporary Expansion Act of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN EXPENSING FOR SMALL BUSINESS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 179(b) 

8 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to dollar 

9 limitation) is amended by striking ‘‘$125,000 in the case 

10 of taxable years beginning after 2006 and before 2011’’ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5085 IH

1 and inserting ‘‘$500,000 in the case of taxable years be2 ginning after 2007 and before 2011’’. 

3 (b) PHASEOUT OF LIMITATION ONLY BY 50 PER4 CENT OF EXCESS OVER $2,000,000.—Paragraph (2) of 

5 section 179(b) of such Code (relating to reduction in limi6 tation) is amended to read as follows: 

7 ‘‘(2) REDUCTION IN LIMITATION.—The limita8 tion under paragraph (1) for any taxable year shall 

9 be reduced (but not below zero) by the amount (one10 half of such amount in the case of taxable years be11 ginning after 2007 and before 2011) by which the 

12 cost of section 179 property placed in service during 

13 such taxable year exceeds $200,000 ($2,000,000 in 

14 the case of taxable years beginning after 2007 and 

15 before 2011).’’. 

16 (c) REBASING OF INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS.—Sec17 tion 179(b)(5)(A) of such Code (relating to inflation ad18 justments) is amended— 

19 (1) in the matter preceding clause (i) by strik20 ing ‘‘2007 and before 2011, the $125,000 and 

21 $500,000’’ and inserting ‘‘2008 and before 2011, 

22 the $500,000 and $2,000,000’’, and 

23 (2) in clause (ii) by striking ‘‘calendar year 

24 2006’’ and inserting ‘‘calendar year 2007’’. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HR 5085 IH

1 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to property placed in service in 

3 taxable years beginning after December 31, 2007. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
STATE of North Carolina v. William Dillard POWELL.

No. 190A93-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 9, 2005.

James R. Glover, William F. Massengale, Marilyn Ozer, Chapel Hill, David R. Teddy, Shelby, for William D. Powell.

*131Valerie B. Spalding, Special Deputy Attorney General, for N.C. Department of Justice.

Holly Bryan, Monterey Park, CA, Janet Moore, for NC Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Steven Arbogast, Special Deputy Attorney General, for State.

Troy Cahill, Senior Deputy Clerk, for US Supreme Court.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 7th day of March 2005 for Writ of Supersedeas and Motion for Temporary Stay of the judgment of the Superior Court, Cleveland County in this matter, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cleveland County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of March 2005."

Upon consideration of the application filed by Defendant on the 7th day of March 2005 in this matter for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Cleveland County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of March 2005."

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 7th day of March 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the Superior Court, Cleveland County, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court of that County:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of March 2005."
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AEC 1, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the three month period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sean
Froats, president of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Sean Froats
-----------------------
President
August 19, 2005
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5047 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bismuth Subsalicylate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2008 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Bismuth Subsalicylate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BISMUTH SUBSALICYLATE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Bismuth Subsalicylate (CAS 

No. 14882–18–9) (provided 

for in subheading 

2918.21.10) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

HR 5047 IH 

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

2 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Exhibit 31

Certifications

I, Richard Simpson, certify that:

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust 2018-C5 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association; KeyBank National Association; Pentalpha Surveillance LLC; U.S. Bank National Association; AEGON USA Realty Advisors, LLC; Situs Holdings, LLC; Wells Fargo Bank, National Association; Computershare Trust Company, National Association; Park Bridge Lender Services LLC; CWCapital Asset Management LLC; CoreLogic Solutions, LLC; and Wilmington Trust, National Association.

Date:March 30, 2022

|  | /s/ Richard Simpson ___________________Richard SimpsonPresident, Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc.(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

CGCMT 2018-C5 Certifications
<PAGE>


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
333-13281 and 333-76176 of Cox Radio, Inc. on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 333-35398 of Cox Radio, Inc., Cox Radio Trust I and Cox Radio
Trust II on Form S-3 of our report dated February 8, 2002 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating
to the adoption, effective January 1, 2001, of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 133, as amended), appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Cox Radio, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 18, 2002
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

         Net income per common share of $1.06 for the year ended June 30, 1998
was calculated by dividing net income of $1,203,707 for the year ended June 30,
1998 by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 1,136,778.
Net income per common share of $0.82 for the year ended June 30, 1997 was
calculated by dividing net income of $926,914 for the period from December 20,
1996 through June 30, 1997, by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding of 1,126,881. Because the Conversion was not effective until
December 20, 1996, earnings per share data for the year ended June 30, 1997 is
comprised of the earnings for the post-conversion period. The number of shares
purchased by the ESOP which have not been allocated or committed to be released
to participant accounts are not assumed to be outstanding in calculating the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding. All information set forth
above regarding net income per share and weighted average common shares
outstanding. All information set forth above regarding net income per share and
weighted average common shares outstanding includes the effects of the
three-for-one stock split effected in the form of a dividend that occurred
during the quarter ended June 30, 1998.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-10720

Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Miriam Crystal Herrera,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-6-9

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Miriam Crystal Herrera, federal prisoner # 56791-177, appeals the 

district court’s denial of her motion for release to home confinement or for a 

reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), as amended 

by the First Step Act. Herrera’s motion was largely based on the presence of 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 22, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-10720 Document: 00515947940 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2021
No. 20-10720

2

the COVID-19 virus in her prison unit and her assertion that she has medical 

conditions that increase the risk the virus poses to her health. The district 

court determined that it had no authority to release Herrera to home 

confinement, and it denied the request for a compassionate-release sentence 

reduction on the merits.

We review the denial of a motion for compassionate release for an 

abuse of discretion. United States v. Thompson, 984 F.3d 431, 433 (5th Cir. 

2021), cert. denied, 2021 WL 2044647 (U.S. May 24, 2021) (No. 20-7832). 

“[A] court abuses its discretion if it bases its decision on an error of law or a 

clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence.” United States v. Chambliss, 

948 F.3d 691, 693 (5th Cir. 2020) (internal quotation marks and citation 

omitted).

Herrera’s brief focuses mainly on arguments challenging the district 

court’s calculation of her guidelines sentencing range and her 480-month 

sentence. She fails to brief any challenge to the district court’s determination 

that she failed to show extraordinary and compelling circumstances, as 

required for § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) relief. While the filings of pro se litigants like 

Herrera are afforded liberal construction, even pro se litigants must brief 

arguments to preserve them. See Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th 

Cir. 1993). Herrera has failed to show an abuse of discretion by the district 

court, and the order denying her motion for release is AFFIRMED. Her 

motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED because the interest of 

justice does not require the appointment of counsel here. See Schwander v. 

Blackburn, 750 F.2d 494, 502-03 (5th Cir. 1985); Fifth Circuit Plan 

Under the Criminal Justice Act § 3(B).

Case: 20-10720 Document: 00515947940 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/22/2021