alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES



Information relating to the subsidiaries of QuadraMed as of January 1, 2005 is set forth below. All of the indicated subsidiaries are directly or
indirectly wholly-owned by QuadraMed except as indicated.



|                                         |  |                                              
|---------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                       |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|                                         | 
|QuadraMed Financial Services Corporation |  | California                                   
|                                         | 
|QuadraMed Affinity Corporation           |  | Delaware                                     
|                                         | 
|Tempus Software LLC                      |  | Delaware                                     
|                                         | 
|QuadraMed International Pty Limited      |  | Australia
STATE v. OSTEEN.

COA03-1073.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 3, 2004.

Certification Date August 23, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-17-00301-CR

____________________

JOHN LLOYD FRAZER II, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the 258th District Court

Polk County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 24926

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

John Lloyd Frazer II has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.2. A request to dismiss the appeal is signed by appellant personally and joined 

by counsel of record. No opinion has issued in this appeal. The motion is granted, 

and the appeal is therefore dismissed.
2

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

 LEANNE JOHNSON

 Justice

 

Submitted on February 27, 2018

Opinion Delivered February 28, 2018

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
H. R. 1228 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 123 South 

9th Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CORPORAL JUSTIN D. ROSS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 123 South 9th Street in De Pere, Wisconsin, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Corporal Justin D. Ross 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Corporal Justin D. Ross Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
SMITH BARNEY ALLOCATION SERIES INC.

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT


	SMITH BARNEY ALLOCATION SERIES INC. a Maryland corporation,
having its principal office in Baltimore City, Maryland
(hereinafter called the "Corporation"), hereby certifies to the
State Department of Assessments and Taxation of Maryland that:

	FIRST: The Charter of the Corporation is hereby amended to
change the name of the Smith Barney Allocation Select High Growth
Portfolio to Select High Growth Portfolio, the name of the Smith
Barney Allocation Select Growth Portfolio to Select Growth
Portfolio and the name of the Smith Barney Allocation Select
Balanced Portfolio to Select Balanced Portfolio, each a series of
the Corporation.

	SECOND:  The foregoing amendment to the Charter of the
Corporation has been approved by a majority of the entire Board of
Directors of the Corporation and is limited to changes expressly
permitted by Section 2-605 of the Maryland General Corporation Law
to be made without action of the stockholders.

	THE UNDERSIGNED, the President of Smith Barney Allocation
Series Inc. acknowledges these Articles of Amendment to be the
corporate act of the Corporation and hereby certifies to the best
of his knowledge, information and belief that the matters and facts
set forth in these Articles of Amendment with respect to the
authorization and approval of the amendment to the Corporation's
Articles of Incorporation are true in all material respects under
the penalties of perjury.

	IN WITNESS WHEREOF, SMITH BARNEY CONCERT ALLOCATION SERIES
INC. has caused these Articles of Amendment to be executed and
acknowledged in its name and on its behalf by its President and
witnessed by its Assistant Secretary on this 9th day of April,
2001.



					SMITH BARNEY ALLOCATION SERIES INC.


					By:

					      Heath B. McLendon
					      President


WITNESS:

_____________________________
Barbara J. Allen
Assistant Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4871 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4871

   To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Aminotoluene-5-Sulfonic Acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 19, 2007

   Mr. Clay introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on 2-Aminotoluene-5-Sulfonic Acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 2-AMINOTOLUENE-5-SULFONIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902._._        2-Aminotoluene-5-   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         Sulfonic Acid                                                      31/2011
                         (CAS No. 98-33-9)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2921.43.90)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of Information Architects Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2011, the undersigned Thomas M Jaspers hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



April 15, 2012

/s/ Thomas M Jaspers

Thomas M Jaspers CFO







* * * * *



A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5060 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5060

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to allow athletes admitted 
  as nonimmigrants described in section 101(a)(15)(P) of such Act to 
    renew their period of authorized admission in 5-year increments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2008

  Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California (for herself, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. 
Engel, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Towns, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Coble, Mr. 
Flake, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Pascrell, Mrs. McCarthy of New York, Mr. Stupak, 
 Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Bishop of New York, and Mr. Serrano) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to allow athletes admitted 
  as nonimmigrants described in section 101(a)(15)(P) of such Act to 
    renew their period of authorized admission in 5-year increments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERIOD OF AUTHORIZED ADMISSION FOR CERTAIN NONIMMIGRANT 
              ATHLETES.

    Section 214(a)(2)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1184(a)(2)(B)) is amended by striking ``for an additional period 
of up to 5 years.'' and inserting ``in 5-year increments.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1453 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1453

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority to 
  provide work-study allowance for certain activities by individuals 
 receiving educational assistance by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2013

  Mr. Takano (for himself, Mr. Hunter, and Mr. Flores) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend the authority to 
  provide work-study allowance for certain activities by individuals 
 receiving educational assistance by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Work-Study for Student Veterans 
Act''.

SEC. 2. WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCE.

    Section 3485(a)(4) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``June 30, 2013'' each place it appears and inserting ``June 
30, 2018''.
                                 <all>
```
HomeEducationCurrents

# The Coriolis Effect

## Currents Tutorial

**Click the image**

**Click the image**

Coastal currents are affected by local winds. Surface ocean currents,  which occur on the open ocean, are driven by a complex global wind  system. To understand the effects of winds on ocean currents, one first  needs to understand the Coriolis force and the Ekman spiral.

If the Earth did not rotate and remained stationary, the atmosphere  would circulate between the poles (high pressure areas) and the equator (a low pressure area) in a simple back-and-forth pattern. But because  the Earth rotates, circulating air is deflected. Instead of circulating  in a straight pattern, the air deflects toward the right in the  Northern Hemisphere and toward the left in the Southern Hemisphere,  resulting in curved paths. This deflection is called the Coriolis  effect. It is named after the French mathematician Gaspard Gustave de  Coriolis (1792-1843), who studied the transfer of energy in rotating  systems like waterwheels. (Ross, 1995).

### Currents Lessons

              - Welcome
              - Tidal Currents 1
              - Tidal Currents 2
              Coastal Currents
              - Waves
              - Longshore Currents
              - Rip Currents
              - Upwelling
              Surface Ocean Currents
              - The Coriolis Effect
              - Surface Ocean Currents
              - Boundary Currents
              - The Ekman Spiral
              The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Thermohaline Circulation
              - The Global Conveyor Belt
              - Effects of Climate Change
              How Are Currents Measured?
              - Age of Exploration
              - What is a "knot"?
              - Shallow Water Drifter
              - Deep Ocean Drifter
              - Current Profiler
              - Shore-based Current Meters
              - How Currents Affect Our Lives?
              - References
              - Roadmap to Resources
              - Subject Review

###### **Search** Education

###### Get **Social**

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
IIB 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5030 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2008 

Received 

OCTOBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 17), 2008 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

AN ACT 

For the relief of Corina de Chalup Turcinovic. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HR 5030 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR CORINA 

2 DE CHALUP TURCINOVIC. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

4 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

5 Act, Corina de Chalup Turcinovic shall be eligible for 

6 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

7 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi8 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi9 grant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment 

10 of status to lawful permanent resident. 

11 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Corina de Chalup 

12 Turcinovic enters the United States before the filing dead13 line specified in subsection (c), she shall be considered to 

14 have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise 

15 eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 

16 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date 

17 of the enactment of this Act. 

18 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

19 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap20 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica21 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

22 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

23 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

24 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res25 idence to Corina de Chalup Turcinovic, the Secretary of 

26 State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, durVerDate Aug 31 2005 05:55 Oct 03, 2008 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H5030.RFS H5030

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

HR 5030 RFS 

1 ing the current or next following fiscal year, the total num2 ber of immigrant visas that are made available to natives 

3 of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) 

4 of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, 

5 the total number of immigrant visas that are made avail6 able to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under 

7 section 202(e) of such Act. 

8 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

9 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 

10 parents, brothers, and sisters of Corina de Chalup 

11 Turcinovic shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be ac12 corded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigra13 tion and Nationality Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 16, 

2008. 

Attest: LORRAINE C. MILLER, 

Clerk. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
IN RE Anthony K. ANDERSON, Petitioner

No. 18-9476

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Transition Report on Form 10-K of KLX Energy Services Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher J. Baker, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 11, 2022/s/ Christopher J. BakerChristopher J. BakerPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT 32.0**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as
an officer of Citizens Community Bancorp (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and results of operations of the Company for such period.

|Date:  February 11, 2005 | By: | /s/ James G. CooleyJames G. Cooley
President and Chief Executive Officer
|------------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        
|Date:  February 11, 2005 | By: | /s/ John ZettlerJohn Zettler
Chief Financial Officer
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 12, 2021.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-21-00330-CR

WILLIAM WELDON JONES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 94-CR-0354

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal of the trial court’s order denying appellant a free 

copy of transcripts. In Texas, appeals in criminal cases are permitted only when 

they are authorized by statute. State ex rel. Lykos, 330 S.W.3d 904, 915 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2011); see Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 44.02. Generally, a criminal 

defendant may only appeal from a final judgment. See State v. Sellers, 790 S.W.2d 

316, 321 n. 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990). The courts of appeals do not have 

jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders in a criminal appeal absent express 
2

statutory authority. Apolinar v. State, 820 S.W.2d 792, 794 (Tex. Crim. App.

1991). See also Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

The denial of a request for transcripts is not an appealable order. On July 8, 

2021, this court notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction unless a party demonstrated that the court has jurisdiction. Appellant’s 

response fails to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

Because this appeal does not fall within the exceptions to the general rule 

that appeal may be taken only from a final judgment of conviction, we have no 

jurisdiction. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Zimmerer 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
** EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, John R. Miller, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company,LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting. 

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ John R. Miller                      |
|     |  | John R. Miller*Chief Executive Officer* |

Date: July 11, 2005
Jose Joaquin RAMIREZ, Petitioner, v. Jeffrey C. BLOOM, et al.

No. 19-6741

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 27, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.