alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------
                                                                                

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                       JURISDICTION                  PERCENTAGE OF DIRECT/
                                           WHERE                     INDIRECT OWNERSHIP BY
SUBSIDIARY                               ORGANIZED                PRIMEX OF VOTING SECURITIES
----------                               ---------                ---------------------------
<S>                                    <C>                        <C>
 
General Defense Corporation            Pennsylvania                          100%
                                                                             
Primex Aerospace Company                Washington                           100%
                                                                             
Primex Tactical Systems, Inc.           California                           100%
                                                                             
U.S. Ordnance Company                    Delaware                            100%
                                                                             
St. Marks Powder, Inc.                   Delaware                            100%
                                                                             
Defense Research Incorporated             Alabama                            100%
                                                                             
Hitech Holdings, Inc.                    Delaware                            100%
</TABLE>
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5119 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2-Dimethylbutanoic acid 3-(2,4- 

dichlorophenyl)–2-oxo-1-oxaspiro(4.5)dec-3-en-4-yl ester. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2008 

Mr. HULSHOF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on 2,2-Dimethylbutanoic 

acid 3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)–2-oxo-1-oxaspiro(4.5)dec-3- 

en-4-yl ester. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. 2,2-DIMETHYLBUTANOIC ACID 3-(2,4- 

4 DICHLOROPHENYL)-2-OXO-1- 

5 OXASPIRO(4.5)DEC-3-EN-4-YL ESTER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.12.02 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 2,2-Dimethylbutanoic acid 3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1- 

9 oxaspiro(4.5)dec-3-en-4-yl ester) is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5119 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
78 Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021

NEW JERSEY 

#21

$9.3 B SPENT IN 

#36

1.3% OF STATE GDP

1.7%

OF TOTAL U.S. 

$1,002

PER RESIDENT 

#17

$7.3 B CONTRACT 

#24

34,586 NUMBER OF 

#22

$2.0 B PERSONNEL 

STATE DEFENSE SPENDING SPENDING PERSONNEL SPENDING 

, DEFENSE CONTRACTS

By Type 

Research and

Construction: 1% Development: 11%

Service: 20%

Supplies and

Equipment: 68%

By Service 

Army

30%

Navy/Marines

32%

Air Force

8%

Other Defense

30%

DEFENSE PERSONNEL 

Allocations, By Type

Active Duty: 19% Reserve: 25%

National Civilian: 32%

Guard: 25%

Allocations, By Service 

Army

48%

Navy/Marines

17%

Air Force

34%

Other Defense

2%

Top Defense Contractors 

Lockheed Martin

Merck & Co., Inc.

Arctic Slope Regional Corp.

SAIC

L3Harris Technologies

AASKI Technology

Advanced Sciences and Technologies, LLC

Amentum Services, Inc.

URS Federal Services International, Inc.

Johnson & Johnson

(M = millions, B = billions)

$1.6 B

$1.2 B

$597.8 M

$422.8 M

$354.2 M

$123.9 M

$113.5 M

$98.0 M

$79.0 M

$62.4 M

Contract Awards Performed (By Fiscal Year, billions)

$7.3 $6.8

FY14 FY15 FY16 FY18 FY19

$5.7 $5.7 $5.0 $5.1 $4.6 $4.0

FY17 FY20 FY21

$2.0 BILLION 34,586

TOTAL PAYROLL TOTAL PERSONNEL 

Top Defense Personnel Locations

County Active Civilian National

Duty Guard

Burlington 5,545 2,911 1,793

Morris 129 4,516 651

Ocean 258 2,256 682

Atlantic ND 345 1,399

Monmouth 263 322 690

Bergen 58 27 458 

Camden 49 55 255 

Hudson ND 101 292 

Mercer 21 75 197 

Middlesex 62 32 192 

Reserve Total

6,677 16,926

281 5,577

42 3,238

93 ND 

431 1,706

291 834 

256 615

170 ND 

226 519 

161 447 
(M=millions)

(M=millions) (M=millions)

NEW JERSEY FISCAL YEAR 2018 FISCAL YEAR 2018

FISCAL YEAR 2021 

Hudson

Mercer

Atlantic

TOP DEFENSE PERSONNEL SPENDING LOCATIONS 

TOP DEFENSE CONTRACT SPENDING LOCATIONS (M = millions, B = billions)

Burlington

Union

Morris

Essex

Camden

Monmouth

Passaic

Middlesex

Somerset

Ocean

(M = millions)

$2.7 B

$1.3 B

$565.2 M

$471.0 M

$391.4 M

$357.2 M

$348.7 M

$176.2 M

$146.6 M

$139.0 M

Burlington

Morris

Ocean

Monmouth

Atlantic

Camden

Bergen

Mercer

Hudson

Middlesex

$883.3 M 

$555.2 M

$277.4 M

$77.1 M

$71.1 M

$21.4 M

$21.4 M

$18.4 M

$16.3 M

$16.3 M

Passaic

Morris

Somerset

Essex

Union

Monmouth

Camden Ocean

Morris

Bergen

Camden Ocean

Burlington

Burlington Monmouth

Middlesex

Middlesex

Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation — Defense Spending by State, FY 2021 7

AF Active AF Guard AF Reserve Army Active Army Guard Army Reserve MC Active Navy Active WHS

9
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,297,039
<SECURITIES>                                 2,000,573
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,264,040
<ALLOWANCES>                                    80,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,363,724
<PP&E>                                       1,376,746
<DEPRECIATION>                                 514,998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,180,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,585,295
<BONDS>                                         75,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,278
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,518,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,180,988
<SALES>                                      6,420,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,420,833
<CGS>                                        4,189,366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,189,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,400,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,754
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,123
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,437
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,314)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,314)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
WALKER v. WALKER.

No. COA03-998.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 20, 2004.

Certification Date August 9, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded in part, affirmed in part.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2018033DE.01000502.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 7.2.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 33/5 |

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie (EU) 2016/1148 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 6. Juli 2016 über Maßnahmen zur Gewährleistung eines hohen gemeinsamen Sicherheitsniveaus von Netz- und Informationssystemen in der Union

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 194 vom 19. Juli 2016](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2016_194_R_TOC)
)

Seite 29, Anhang II, Tabelle, Reihe „7. Digitale Infrastruktur“

Anstatt:

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| „7. | Digitale Infrastruktur | | | | | | --- | --- | | — | IXPs | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | DNS-Dienstanbieter | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | TLS-Name-Registries“ | |

muss es heißen:

| | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| „7. | Digitale Infrastruktur | | | | | | --- | --- | | — | IXPs | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | DNS-Dienstanbieter | |
| | | | | --- | --- | | — | TLD-Name-Registries“ | |

---
HomeOcean Facts

# What is a coral reef made of?

## A coral reef is made of thin layers of calcium carbonate

Coral polyps form a living mat over a calcium carbonate skeleton. 

Stony corals (or scleractinians) are the corals primarily  responsible for laying the foundations of, and building up, reef structures.  Massive reef structures are formed when each individual stony coral organism—or polyp—secretes a skeleton of calcium carbonate. 

Most stony corals have very small polyps, averaging one to  three millimeters (0.04 to 0.12 inches) in diameter, but entire colonies can  grow very large and weigh several tons. These colonies consist of millions of  polyps that grow on top of the limestone remains of former colonies, eventually  forming massive reefs.

In general, massive corals tend to grow slowly, increasing  in size from 0.5 to two centimeters (0.2 to 0.8 inches) per year. However,  under favorable conditions (lots of light, consistent temperature, moderate  wave action), some species can grow as much as 4.5 centimeters (1.8 inches) per  year.

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program
          - U.S. Coral Reef Task Force
          - NOAA Coral Reef Information System
          -  Coral Health and Monitoring Program
          - Corals Tutorial
          - Five Things You Should Know About Coral Reefs 
          - Value of Coral Reef (audio podcast)

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:00 a.m. EDT, Friday, July 1, 2022.

# PLACE: 

Virtual meeting.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        Enforcement matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Robert Sidman, 202-418-5317.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: June 24, 2022.

Robert Sidman,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2022-13982 Filed 6-27-22; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
**EXHIBIT32.1**

# **CERTIFICATIONBY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Visant Holding Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marc L. Reisch, the Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 11, 2006 | /s/ Marc L.  Reisch        |
|-----------------------|----------------------------|
|                  | Marc L. Reisch             |
|                  | *President  and*           |
|                  | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 and shall not except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and this certification will not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the registrantspecifically incorporates it by reference.

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, David A. Chaput, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Moly, Inc. for thequarter ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of General Moly, Inc.

 

Dated: November 9, 2009

 
|   | By:    | /s/ David A.  Chaput    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | David A. Chaput         |
|   | Title: | Chief Financial Officer |
|        |        |                         |  |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) ofInfoSonics Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2007,Joseph Ram, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: August 14, 2007 |     | /s/ Joseph  Ram                    |
|------------------------|----------|-----------------------------------------|
|                   |     | Joseph Ram,                             |
|                   | * * | *Chief Executive Officer and President* |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 4772 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 4772

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on handheld electric can 
                                openers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2007

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on handheld electric can 
                                openers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HANDHELD ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.38 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. MORRISON

No. COA04-985

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed May 3, 2005.

Certification Date May 23, 2005.

Appeal from the Harnett (02CRS52699, 03CRS4766, 03CRS4767).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
EXHIBIT 32.4

CERTIFICATION BY THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Visant Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul B. Carousso, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                               
|--------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Paul B. Carousso                          
|                      |  | Paul B. Carousso                              
|                      |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|                      |  | (principal financial officer)
Exhibit 32.3

QUADRAMED CORPORATION

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of QuadraMed Corporation for the period ended December 31, 2005, I, Keith B. Hagen, Chief
Executive Officer of QuadraMed Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my best knowledge:



|1. | This Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of QuadraMed Corporation.
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                       
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 17, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Keith B. Hagen                    
|                      |  |  |  | Keith B. Hagen Chief Executive
Officer
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2016339DE.01001201.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 14.12.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 339/12 |

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) 2016/427 der Kommission vom 10. März 2016 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 692/2008 hinsichtlich der Emissionen von leichten Personenkraftwagen und Nutzfahrzeugen (Euro 6)

(
[Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 82 vom 31. März 2016](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2016_082_R_TOC)
)

Auf Seite 73, Anhang zur Einfügung eines neuen Anhangs IIIA in die Verordnung (EG) Nr. 692/2008, Anlage 7 Nummer 4.2.7, Fußnote in der Tabelle:

Anstatt:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(\*) | NT darf nicht auf die nächstgrößere ganze Zahl gerundet werden.“ |

muss es heißen:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| „(\*) | NT wird auf die nächstgrößere ganze Zahl gerundet.“ |

---
CHERNEY v. NC ZOOLOGICAL PARK.

No. 606A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 22, 2004.

Joe Thomas Knott, III, Raleigh, for Tinya Cherney.

William H. Borden, Assistant Attorney General, for N.C. Zoological Park.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of December 2004 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:

> "Motion Allowed. Plaintiff (Tinya Cherney) shall have up to and including the 2nd day of February 2005 to file and serve 
*552
his/her brief with this Court. By order of the Court in conference this the 22nd day of December 2004."
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of New York Mortgage Trust, Inc, (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
      May 11, 2009
                
                /s/ Steven
      R. MummaSteven
      R. Mumma
                  Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                  (Principal
      Executive and Principal Financial
Officer)