alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016151DE.01001301.xml

| 28.4.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | C 151/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

C 151/13

---

Berichtigung des Einnahmen- und Ausgabenplans der Europäischen Eisenbahnagentur für das Haushaltsjahr 2016

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 113 vom 30. März 2016
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union C 113 vom 30. März 2016

(2016/C 151/09)

Auf Seite 81 wird der Stellenplan durch den folgenden ersetzt:

Stellenplan

| „Funktions- und Besoldungsgruppe | Dauerplanstelle | Planstellen auf Zeit |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 |
| AD 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AD 15 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| AD 14 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 |
| AD 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AD 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AD 11 | — | — | — | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| AD 10 | — | — | — | 11 | 11 | 14 |
| AD 9 | — | — | — | 29 | 29 | 31 |
| AD 8 | — | — | — | 21 | 21 | 20 |
| AD 7 | — | — | — | 12 | 13 | 13 |
| AD 6 | — | — | — | 24 | 24 | 14 |
| AD 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Zwischensumme AD | — | — | — | 102 | 104 | 99 |
| AST 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AST 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| AST 9 | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| AST 8 | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| AST 7 | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| AST 6 | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| AST 5 | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| AST 4 | — | — | — | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| AST 3 | — | — | — | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| AST 2 | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 3 |
| AST 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Zwischensumme AST | — | — | — | 38 | 33 | 36 |
| Insgesamt | — | — | — | 140 | 137 | 135“ |

„Funktions- und Besoldungsgruppe

Dauerplanstelle

Planstellen auf Zeit

2014

2015

2016

2014

2015

2016

AD 16

—

—

—

—

—

—

AD 15

—

—

—

1

—

—

AD 14

—

—

—

—

1

1

AD 13

—

—

—

—

—

—

AD 12

—

—

—

—

—

—

AD 11

—

—

—

4

5

6

AD 10

—

—

—

11

11

14

AD 9

—

—

—

29

29

31

AD 8

—

—

—

21

21

20

AD 7

—

—

—

12

13

13

AD 6

—

—

—

24

24

14

AD 5

—

—

—

—

—

—

Zwischensumme AD

—

—

—

102

104

99

AST 11

—

—

—

—

—

—

AST 10

—

—

—

—

—

—

AST 9

—

—

—

2

2

3

AST 8

—

—

—

3

3

4

AST 7

—

—

—

3

3

4

AST 6

—

—

—

2

2

3

AST 5

—

—

—

5

5

7

AST 4

—

—

—

7

6

6

AST 3

—

—

—

8

7

6

AST 2

—

—

—

8

5

3

AST 1

—

—

—

—

—

—

Zwischensumme AST

—

—

—

38

33

36

Insgesamt

—

—

—

140

137

135“

---
Edward Ray CROSBY, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 18-9322

Supreme Court of the United States.

October 7, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
|  | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the consolidated financial condition of the company as                  of the                  dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the company                  for                  the periods presented. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| July                      22, 2008 | /s/                      Theodore                      G. Hollinger                                             |   |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                               | Theodore                      G. Hollinger                                                                      |   |
|                               | Acting                      President Chief Executive Officer(Principal                      Executive Officer) |   |

----
Eric T. LATHAM, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.

No. 19-5596

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.
# Official Journal C 286/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.286.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 286 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 562 October 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.286.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 286

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 562 October 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 286/01 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,50 % on 1 October 2013 — Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2013/C 286/02 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 286/01

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,50 % on 1 October 2013 — Euro exchange rates

1

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2013/C 286/02

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 286/03 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 3 |
| 2013/C 286/04 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 7 |
| 2013/C 286/05 | Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs | 12 |

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2013/C 286/03

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

3

2013/C 286/04

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

7

2013/C 286/05

Publication of an application pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs

12

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
LIBERTARIAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, INC., Petitioner v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

No. 19-234

Supreme Court of the United States.

November 25, 2019

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied.

Justice Kavanaugh took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
# L_2016202EN.01004201.xml

| 28.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 202/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 202/42

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2016/1234

of 26 July 2016

appointing two alternate members, proposed by the Italian Republic of the Committee of the Regions

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Italian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 26 January 2015, 5 February 2015 and 23 June 2015, the Council adopted Decisions (EU) 2015/116 (1), (EU) 2015/190 (2) and (EU) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020.

| (2) | Two alternate members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the mandates on the basis of which Mr Carlo FIDANZA (Assessore di Veleso (CO)) and Mr Giuseppe VARACALLI (Sindaco del Comune di Gerace (RC)) were proposed, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Two alternate members' seats on the Committee of the Regions have become vacant following the end of the mandates on the basis of which Mr Carlo FIDANZA (Assessore di Veleso (CO)) and Mr Giuseppe VARACALLI (Sindaco del Comune di Gerace (RC)) were proposed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed as alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2020:

| — | Sig. Carlo FIDANZA, Consigliere del Comune di Rosazza (BI) (change of mandate), |
| --- | --- |

—

Sig. Carlo FIDANZA, Consigliere del Comune di Rosazza (BI) (change of mandate),

| — | Sig. Giuseppe VARACALLI, Consigliere del Comune di Gerace (RC) (change of mandate). |
| --- | --- |

—

Sig. Giuseppe VARACALLI, Consigliere del Comune di Gerace (RC) (change of mandate).

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 2016.

For the Council

The President

M. LAJČÁK

---

(1)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/116 of 26 January 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/190 of 5 February 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25).

2

(3)  Council Decision (EU) 2015/994 of 23 June 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2015 to 25 January 2020 (OJ L 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

3

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 4, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50670 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus OSCAR LOMELI, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:05-CR-573

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Oscar Lomeli raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
William A. HAYES, Lanness K. McKee and wife, Ann McKee, Jimmy Smith and wife, Ruby Smith, Jo Ann Smith, Amy Smith, Sam Tedder and wife, Ann Tedder, Fran J. Coleman, Robert Capps and wife, Beverly Capps, Thomas Lewis and wife, Shirley Lewis, C.M. Ivey and wife, Gladys Ivey, Allen Fowler, III, Robert Floyd, III and wife, Beth Floyd, Barbara Smith, Charles Callahan, A.B. Stubbs and wife, Rebecca Stubbs, Fairmont Gold Club, Inc. v. TOWN OF FAIRMONT.

No. 62P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

C. Wes Hodges, II, for William A. Hayes, et al.

Charles E. Floyd, Fairmont, for Town of Fairmont.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 25th day of January 2005 by Plaintiffs in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2005."
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

QuadraMed Corporation 

Reston Virginia 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-16385, 333-35937, 333-39796, 333-56171, 333-75945, 333-87426,333-114189, 333-118580, 333-118581, 333-141479) of QuadraMed Corporation of our reports dated March 14, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of QuadraMedCorporation’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

 

Bethesda, Maryland 

March 14, 2008
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, ex cept under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estop pel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an o rder and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 4/26/96 TENTH CIRCUIT RONALD CLASSEN, Petitioner - Appellant, No. 95-2095 v. (D.C. No. CIV-94-1445-JP) JOE SPRUNK, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, (D. N.M.) Respondents - Appellees.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the Appellant’s brief and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.1 It is impossible to determine for certain from Mr. Classen’s petition, but it

appears that he is in administrative segregation. Generally, “[a]dministrative segregation may be imposed when an inmate poses a threat to security, when disciplinary charges are pending against an inmate, or when an inmate requires protection.” Hewitt v. Helms , 459 U.S. 460, 463 n.1 (1983). 2 This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s Application for Certi ficate of Probable Cause. We issue the certificate and proceed to the merits of the case. Petitioner Ronald Classen, an inmate at the Cibola County Corrections C enter in Milan, New Mexico, brought this pro se and in forma pauperis action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Mr. Classen is serving a nine-year sentence for statutory rape and c ontributing to the delinquency of a minor. It appears that Mr. Classen’s complaints stemfrom his custody level classification, which he considers too restrictive. 1 In his petition, Mr. Classen asserted six grounds for habeas relief. First, he claimed that his due process rights have been violated because prison officials have abused their discretion by misapplying statutes to justify their setting of hi s custody level. Second, he asserted he was denied due process because he had no opportunity to present his arguments at a hearing regarding his custody level classification. Thir d, he claimed New Mexico’s inmate release program is unconstitutional because it grants pr ison officials punitive decision-making powers. In his fourth and fifth claims, he asserted that3

his custody level classification by the New Mexico Department of Correc tions violated his equal protection rights. Sixth, he claimed his Eighth Amendment rights w ere violated because he is housed in an overcrowded facility without programming and gradual reintegration through a work release program. We have carefully reviewed the district court’s dismissal of Mr. Cla ssen’s claims, and we find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith. Entered for the Court Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5076 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5076

          To suspend temporarily the duty on Mondur M Flaked.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2008

Mr. Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To suspend temporarily the duty on Mondur M Flaked.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MONDUR M FLAKED.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00      Mondur M Flaked     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 101-68-                                                   31/2011
                         8) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2929.10.80)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
JAVUREK v. TAX REVIEW BD. DEPT. OF STATE TREASURER

COA03-1016.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 17, 2004.

Certification Date September 7, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Elder and Fitzpatrick

CARMEL GREEN HOUSES, INC. and FLORISTS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1260-97-4 PER CURIAM OCTOBER 14, 1997 MOHAMMAD HAMMOUDEH

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Alan D. Sundburg; Friedlander, Misler, Friedlander, Sloan & Herz, on brief), for appellants. (Lawrence J. Pascal; Ashcraft & Gerel, on brief), for appellee.

Carmel Green Houses, Inc. and its insurer (hereinafter referred to as employer) contend that the Workers' Compensation Commission (commission) erred in finding that Mohammad Hammoudeh (claimant) proved that he earned a post-injury average weekly wage of $250. Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule

5A:27. Beginning in 1994, claimant became self-employed buying and selling automobiles. Claimant testified that he earned approximately $200 to $250 per week. Claimant produced a profit and loss statement for the six-month period ending June 30, 1996. Claimant's accountant generated the statement based upon

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.2 claimant's business records. Employer did not introduce evidence to dispute claimant's testimony nor did employer request any discovery with respect to claimant's average weekly wage. Based upon this record, the commission awarded claimant benefits based upon a $250 average weekly wage. "It was the duty of the Commission to make the best possible estimate of . . . impairments of earnings from the evidence adduced at the hearing, and to determine the average weekly

wage . . . ." Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. v. Reeves , 1 Va. App. 435, 441, 339 S.E.2d 570, 573 (1986). "This is a question of fact to be determined by the Commission which, if based on credible evidence, will not be disturbed on appeal." Id. "Thus, if credible evidence supports the commission's findings regarding the claimant's average weekly wage, we must uphold those findings." Chesapeake Bay Seafood House v. Clements , 14 Va. App. 143, 146, 415 S.E.2d 864, 866 (1992). Claimant's unrebutted testimony, which was corroborated by the profit and loss statement, constitutes credible evidence to support the commission's findings. Therefore, we must uphold those findings on appeal. Employer's contention that claimant failed to meet his burden of proof because he did not produce additional business records is without merit. Employer had every opportunity to offer evidence to rebut claimant's testimony, but

failed to do so. For these reasons, we affirm the commission's decision.3 Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30681 Summary Calendar

TERRY FLEMING, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CV-2065-H

-------------------- January 27, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Terry Fleming, Louisiana prisoner #114500, appeals from the denial of his application for federal habeas corpus relief. Fleming contends that his guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary because he was not informed of the specific intent element of second-degree murder and because his counsel failed to advise him that he could not be convicted of both felony murder and armed robbery.No. 98-30681 -2- We have reviewed the record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, and we find no reversible error. When, as in

this case, the record shows that the defendant understood the charge and its consequences, the failure of the trial court to explain the elements of the offense does not render the plea involuntary. See DeVille v. Whitley , 21 F.3d 654, 657 (5th Cir. 1994). With respect to his assertion that counsel’s ineffectiveness rendered his plea unknowing and involuntary, Fleming fails to demonstrate a reasonable probability that he would have insisted on going to trial but for counsel’s errors.
See Mangum v. Hargett , 67 F.3d 80, 84 (5th Cir. 1995). The state court’s decision was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1).
AFFIRMED.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE : : : : : No. 453 CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES DOCKET

**O R D E R**
**PER CURIA M:** 

AND NOW , this 5 th day of September , 2014 , Magisterial District Judge Blaise P. Larotonda , Allegheny County , is hereby appointed as a member of the Criminal Procedural Rules Commi tte e for a term of three years commencing October 1, 2014.
**EXHIBIT 32.0**

**CERTIFICATION**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as
an officer of Citizens Community Bancorp (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and results of operations of the Company for such period.

|Date:  August 3, 2004 | By: | /s/ James G. CooleyJames G. Cooley
President and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     
|Date:  August 3, 2004 | By: | /s/ John ZettlerJohn Zettler
Chief Financial Officer