alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors
of the Smith Barney Intermediate Municipal Fund, Inc.:

In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements
of the Smith Barney Intermediate Municipal Fund, Inc. (the
"Fund") for the year ended December 31, 1998, we considered its
internal control, including control activities for safeguarding
securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the
purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and
to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide
assurance on the internal control.

The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and
maintaining internal control.  In fulfilling this responsibility,
estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the
expected benefits and related costs of controls.  Generally,
controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's
objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes
that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of
assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or
fraud may occur and not be detected.  Also, projection of any
evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to
the risk that it may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions or that the effectiveness of the design and operation
may deteriorate.

Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily
disclose all matters in the internal control that might be
material weaknesses under standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A material weakness
is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of
the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively
low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in
amounts that would be material in relation to the financial
statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a
timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions.  However, we noted no matters involving
the internal control and its operation, including controls for
safeguarding securities that we consider to be material
weaknesses as defined above.

This report is intended solely for the information and use of
management, the Board of Directors of the Fund, and the
Securities and Exchange Commission.





February 8, 1999
Exhibit 10.9

                                 CORPORATE NOTE

     Dated: October 12, 2000
     Amount of Note: $15,000.00


     On  October  12  &  13,  2000,  for  value  received,   Torque  Engineering
     Corporation,  a  corporation  organized  under the laws of Deleware,  whose
     principal  place of  business  is located at 2932  Thorne  Drive,  Elkhart,
     Indiana 46514, in this note referred to as corporation,  promises to pay to
     AG & Associates of 4 Riviera  Avenue,  Coto De Cazo, CA 92679, in this note
     referred to as payee, the amounts of Twelve Thousand Dollars ($12,000.00) &
     Three Thousand Dollars ($3,000) respectively, without interest on or before
     June 30, 2001 hereof.

     If there is a default  on such  payment  when  due,  the  entire  amount of
     principal  and interest at the rate of Ten (10%) shall  become  immediately
     due and payable without notice.

     In witness whereof,  corporation has caused this note to be executed by its
     duly authorized officer.

     Torque Engineering Corporation

     By:        /s/ I. Paul Arcuri
                ------------------
                I. Paul Arcuri
                Vice President

     Accepted: /s/ Michael Attias
               --------------------
               Michael Atias
EXHIBIT 21.4

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

     1.     Antek  Wireless,  Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant,
was  incorporated  in  the  State  of  Delaware  on  November  2,  1999.

     2.     Emergent  Technologies  Corp.  was incorporated in the State of West
Virginia  on September 29, 1995. The Registrant holds an 76.625% equity interest
in  Emergent.

     3.     Integral  Vision  Systems Inc. was incorporated in the State of West
Virginia  on January 20, 1994. The Registrant acquired a 100% equity interest in
Integral  Vision  in  March  1997.

     4.     Plastenna,  Inc.,  a  wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant, was
incorporated  in  the  State  of  Delaware  on  February  16,  2001.


<PAGE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1396 

To provide for the inclusion of the State of California as a separate Federal 

milk marketing order upon the petition and approval of California dairy 

producers of such inclusion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21, 2013 

Mr. VALADAO (for himself, Mr. NUNES, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, Mr. 

COSTA, Mr. LAMALFA, and Mr. DENHAM) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To provide for the inclusion of the State of California as 

a separate Federal milk marketing order upon the petition and approval of California dairy producers of such 

inclusion. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘California Federal 

5 Milk Marketing Order Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1396 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF CALIFORNIA AS SEPARATE MILK 

2 MARKETING ORDER. 

3 (a) INCLUSION AUTHORIZED.—Upon the petition and 

4 approval of California dairy producers in the manner pro5 vided in section 8c of the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 

6 U.S.C. 608c), reenacted with amendments by the Agricul7 tural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, the Secretary of 

8 Agriculture shall designate the State of California as a 

9 separate Federal milk marketing order. 

10 (b) SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS.—If designated under 

11 subsection (a), the order covering California shall have the 

12 right to reblend and distribute order receipts to recognize 

13 quota value. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5077 

To extend the suspension of duty on TSME. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 18, 2008 

Mr. TIM MURPHY of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on TSME. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TSME. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.11.85 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 ortho/para-Toluenesulfonic acid, methyl ester (TSME)) is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/ 

8 2011’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5077 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Oceanservice.noa.gov

Discussion Questions: 

1. As you completed the report card for the Bay in 1600, what habitat or animal do you think 

was most critical to the overall health of the Bay?

2. How do you think that the water conditions have changed since that time?

3. What do you think are the causes of the changes in water quality from 1600 to now?

4. What grade do you predict the Chesapeake Bay will have in 10 years? Why?

5. Why should we care about water quality in the Bay?
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DAIRY FRESH FARMS INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Harrison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                        By /s/Robert Harrison
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert Harrison
                                           President, Chief Executive Officer

    Date:  November 21, 2005
Exhibit 4.45

 

Supplementary Agreement II

 

This Supplementary Agreement II (hereinafter referred to as “this Agreement”) is executed in Chaoyang District Beijing on December 31, 2018 between:

 

Party A: Xijin (Shanghai) Venture Capital Investment Management Co., Ltd.

 

Address: Room 212-A, No. 89 Yunling East Road, Putuo District, Shanghai

 

Party B: Shenzhen Qianhai Minheng Business Factoring Co., Ltd.

Address: Room 201, Building A, No. 1 Qianwan 1st Road, Qianhai SZ-HK Cooperation Zone, Shenzhen (registered with Shenzhen Qianhai Business Secretary Co., Ltd.)

 

WHEREAS

 

1.              Party A and Party B have been entered into a loan agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Loan Agreement I”) dated July 14, 2018, and Party A agrees to provide Party B a loan at the amount of RMB 70,000,000 thereunder;

2.              Party A and Party B have been entered into a loan agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Loan Agreement II”) dated July 25, 2018, and Party A agrees to provide Party B a loan at the amount of RMB 120,000,000 thereunder;

3.              Party A and Party B have been entered into a supplementary agreement (hereinafter referred to as “Supplementary Agreement I”) dated August 21, 2018.

 

Both parties agree and amend certain provisions under Supplementary Agreement I as following:

 

I.                                        Amendment to the term of loan

Both parties agree to replace the due date of loan under Loan Agreement I and Loan Agreement II from December 31, 2018 to May 15, 2019. The Term of Loan is renewable and revisable if both parties agree.

II.                                   Miscellaneous

1.              Except for the amendments made under this agreement, the rights and obligations of the two parties under Loan Agreement I, Loan Agreement II and Supplementary Agreement II are still valid and effective; if there is any inconsistency between Loan Agreement I, Loan Agreement II, Supplementary Agreement II and this Agreement, this Agreement shall prevail.

2.              This Agreement shall become effective once both of the parties have affixed the official seal or the contract seal.

3.              This Agreement is made in duplicate, and each party holds one counterpart having the same legal effect.

(The following is intentionally left blank)

 











 

(This is the signature page to the Supplementary Agreement II)

 

Party A: Xijin (Shanghai) Venture Capital Investment Management Co., Ltd. (seal)

 



 

Party B: Shenzhen Qianhai Minheng Business Factoring Co., Ltd. (seal)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,825
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,725
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,744
<INVENTORY>                                      1,350
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,386
<PP&E>                                         443,825
<DEPRECIATION>                                  73,581
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 573,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,474
<BONDS>                                        344,049
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           639
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,848
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   573,116
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               429,929
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  329,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,798
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 72,224
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             42,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,144
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    40,880
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Seantrey MORRIS, Petitioner, v. Joseph MEKDESSIE, et al.

No. 19-266

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Motion of TASC, Inc. for leave to file a brief as *amicus curiae* granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
STATE of North Carolina v. Brian Frank GONZALES.

No. 339PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 5, 2005.

On writ of certiorari pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-32(b) of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, 164 N.C.App. 512, 596 S.E.2d 297 (2004), reversing an order entered by Judge Ernest B. Fullwood on 2 January 2003 in Superior Court, New Hanover County. Heard in the Supreme Court 18 April 2005.

Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by William B. Crumpler, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.

*833Crossley, McIntosh, Prior & Collier, by Samuel H. MacRae, Wilmington, for defendant-appellant.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Rick Cox, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10 QSB of Northwest Horizon Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and  procedures  to be designed under my supervision,  to ensure that material  information  relating  to the small  business issuer, including  its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) Omitted;



c)  Evaluated  the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures  and presented in this report my  conclusions  about the effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's internal control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial  reporting,  to the small  business  issuer's  auditors  and the audit committee  of the  small  business  issuer's  board  of  directors  (or  persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  June 15, 2004





By: /s/ Rick Cox

Rick Cox

President and CEO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**DARELL LEE HOLMES,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 804 MAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 29th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allo wance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

        Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Hospira, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Christopher B. Begley, Chairman andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/  CHRISTOPHER  B. BEGLEY |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher B. Begley                 |   |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| April 28, 2009                   |   |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Desert Capital REIT, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we,
the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. November 29, 2004
    
    /s/ TODD B. PARRIOTTTodd B. Parriott,Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer,
President and Chief Investment OfficerNovember 29, 2004
    
    /s/ JONATHAN G. ARENSJonathan G. ArensChief Financial Officer
Order entered September 29 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 15

- 01106

- CV

IN RE MAURICIO ANTONIO CAB RERA, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 195th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause N o. F

- 1057867

- N



### O RDER

Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Stoddart and Whitehill

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS

JUSTICE
STATE v. DAVIS.

COA03-463.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 3, 2004.

Certification Date August 23, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit 10.23**

 

**QUADRAMED CORPORATION**

 

**AMENDMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

 

**THIS AGREEMENT**(the “Agreement”), dated this5th day of October, 2003, is by and between QuadraMed Corporation, a corporation organized under the laws of theState of Delaware and having its principal place of business at 12110 Sunset Hills Road, Suite 600, Reston, Virginia 20190 (the “Company”), and Charles J. Stahl, an individual residing at (“Employee”), and

 

**WITNESSETH THAT:**

 

**WHEREAS**, Employee and the Company have heretofore entered into anemployment agreement, dated as April 15, 2003 (the “Employment Agreement”); 

 

**WHEREAS**, Employee and the Company desire to revise the Employment Agreement; 

 

**NOW, THEREFORE**, Employee and the Company hereby agree that from and after the date of execution of this Agreement the Employment Agreement shall beand is hereby amended as follows: 

 

1. The Employment Agreementand Section 10 thereof, pertaining to Employee’s severance benefits on certain terminations of his employment, is hereby amended by (i) redesignating Sections 10 C through D as Sections 10 D through E and adjusting appropriately allcross-references to any of said Sections and (ii) adding a new Section 10 C to read in its entirety as follows: 

 

“**10 C. Option Acceleration**. If Employee is terminated by reason of an Involuntary Termination of Employee’semployment (other than a Termination for Cause), each of Employee’s Options under the Stock Option Plan and all restricted or unvested Common Stock granted by the Company will (to the extent not then otherwise exercisable or vested)automatically accelerate and vest and any repurchase rights with respect thereto will terminate so that each such Option or share of restricted or unvested Common Stock will become immediately and fully exercisable or vested as of the date ofInvoluntary Termination. Not withstanding the provisions of Section 5 of the Stock Option Plan, each such accelerated Option, together with all of Employee’s other vested Options, will remain exercisable for a period of three (3) yearsfollowing Employee’s Involuntary Termination and may be exercised for any or all of the option shares, including the accelerated shares, in accordance with the exercise provisions of the Option agreement evidencing the grant. If Employee isterminated by reason of a Termination for Cause the provisions of this Section 10 C will not apply.” 

 

1 

2. Except as provided in the preceding paragraphs of this Agreement, the provisions of the EmploymentAgreement remain in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms. 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed under seal as of the date first above written. 

 
**QUADRAMED CORPORATION**By: 
/s/ Lawrence P. English
    
Lawrence P. English

Its Chief Executive Officer

 
**EMPLOYEE**By: 
/s/ Charles J. Stahl
    
Charles J. Stahl

 

2