alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               26
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       500
<ALLOWANCES>                                          7
<INVENTORY>                                         444
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,027
<PP&E>                                            2,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                      905
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               721
<BONDS>                                           1,787
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              1
<OTHER-SE>                                        1,395
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5,065
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,607
<CGS>                                             1,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1,409
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    (44)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   64
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     178
<INCOME-TAX>                                         76
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 102
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      1.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.37
        

</TABLE>
IN RE K.L.S.

No. COA04-1328

North Carolina Court of Appeals

Filed July 19, 2005

Certification Date August 8, 2005

Appeal from McDowell (01J88, 01J89, 01J90).

Case without published opinion. Remanded.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5115 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain controllers for electric 

power assisted braking systems, designed for use in hybrid vehicles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 23, 2008 

Mr. HULSHOF introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain controllers for electric power assisted braking systems, designed for use in hybrid vehicles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN CONTROLLERS FOR ELECTRIC 

4 POWER ASSISTED BRAKING SYSTEMS, DE5 SIGNED FOR USE IN HYBRID VEHICLES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.10.95 of the Har7 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

8 certain controllers for electric power assisted braking sys9 tems, designed for use in hybrid vehicles) is amended by 

10 striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5115 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Helicos BioSciences Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended March 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report), we Stanley N. Lapidus, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company, Stephen J. Lombardi, the Interim
Principal Financial Officer of the Company, and Kevin G. Lafond, the Interim Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge that:



|Dated: May 13, 2008 | /s/STANLEY N. LAPIDUSStanley N. Lapidus Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)           
|------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 13, 2008 | /s/STEPHEN J. LOMBARDIStephen J. Lombardi President and Chief Operating Officer
(Interim Principal Financial Officer)
|Dated: May 13, 2008 | /s/KEVIN G. LAFONDKevin G. Lafond Controller
(Interim Principal Accounting Officer)                                  

---



QuickLinks
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4844 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing n-butyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (Butyl benzisothiazoline technical), 1-hydroxypyridine-2- 

thione, zinc salt (Zinc pyrithione) and application adjuvants. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. REYNOLDS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures containing 

n-butyl-1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one (Butyl benzisothiazoline technical), 1-hydroxypyridine-2-thione, zinc salt (Zinc 

pyrithione) and application adjuvants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4844 IH

1 SECTION 1. MIXTURES CONTAINING N-BUTYL-1,2-BENZISO2 THIAZOLIN-3-ONE (BUTYL BENZISOTHIAZO3 LINE TECHNICAL), 1-HYDROXYPYRIDINE-2- 

4 THIONE, ZINC SALT (ZINC PYRITHIONE) AND 

5 APPLICATION ADJUVANTS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

7 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

8 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

9 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.l.l Mixtures containing n-butyl1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one 

(Butyl benzisothiazoline 

technical) (CAS No. 4299– 

07–4), 1-hydroxypyridine-2- 

thione, zinc salt (Zinc 

pyrithione) (CAS No. 

13463–41–7) and application adjuvants (provided for 

in subheading 3808.99.08) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

12 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

13 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
INOVA HEALTH SYSTEM, Appellant, v. Steven GRANDIS, Appellee.

Record No. 040242.

Supreme Court of Virginia.

November 5, 2004.

Inova Health System appeals from a October 31, 2003 judgment of the Circuit Court of Fairfax County holding that Inova Mount Vernon Hospital (Inova) had the obligation to care for Steven Grandis and to advise the Fairfax County Department of Human Development if it chose to discharge Grandis. Upon review of the record, briefs, and argument of counsel, the Court is of opinion that there is error in the judgment of the circuit court.

On November 9, 2002, Grandis was involuntarily committed by order of the General District Court of Fairfax County to Inova for a period of 180 days pursuant to Code § 37.1-67.3(I). The commitment order was affirmed by the circuit court on December 20, 2002.

On January 21, 2003, the director of Inova discharged Grandis, finding that Grandis was not an imminent danger to himself or others and that his discharge would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to Grandis. Subsequently, the circuit court held a number of hearings and entered various orders relating to Grandis' involuntary commitment. Throughout this period, Inova asserted that it had properly discharged Grandis in January 2003, that it was not responsible for the care of Grandis, and that the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to enter the various orders, including the October 31, 2003 order at issue here.

Code § 37.1-67.3(K) states that a person committed pursuant to an order of involuntary commitment under that section "shall be released at the expiration of 180 days unless involuntarily committed by further petition and order of a court as provided herein." In this case, the 180 day period ended well before the October 31, 2003 order was entered and no "further petition" had been filed. Although the circuit court stated that it "lacked jurisdiction over the person of Steven Grandis due to the passage of more than 180 days since his involuntary commitment," it nevertheless continued to adjudicate matters involving Grandis' involuntary commitment. The circuit court did not have authority to adjudicate matters involving Grandis' involuntary commitment because that court's jurisdiction over the involuntary commitment ended 180 days after the commitment order was entered.

For the reasons stated, the Court reverses that portion of the judgment of the circuit court imposing on Inova certain requirements and an obligation to care for Grandis and dismisses Inova from this proceeding.

This order shall be certified to the said circuit court and shall be published in the Virginia Reports.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1



                        Consent of Independent Auditors


The Board of Directors
Carrier Access Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-
71209) on Form S-8 of Carrier Access Corporation of our reports dated January
21, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Carrier Access
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999,
and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the
December 31, 1999, annual report on form 10-K of Carrier Access Corporation.



                                    KPMG LLP


Denver, Colorado
March 27, 2000
Sammie E. WILLIAMS and Williams Seafood, Inc. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES, DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT and N.C. COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION.

No. 519P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

Lars P. Simonsen, Windsor, for Williams.

Jill Hickey, Special Deputy Attorney General, for NCDENR, et al.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 11th day of October 2004 by Petitioners in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
# C_2023195EN.01001301.xml

| 2.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/13

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.106647

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 195/12)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 21.4.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.106647 |
| Member State | Lithuania |
| Region | Lithuania |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Lietuvos Respublikos 2022-2027 metų regioninės plėtros žemėlapis |
| Legal basis | Lietuvos Respublikos regioninės plėtros įstatymas Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės nutarimo ‘Dėl Lietuvos Respublikos 2022-2027 metų regioninės pagalbos žemėlapio’ pakeitimo projektas pridedamas |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Regional development (including territorial cooperation) |
| Form of aid | Direct grant, Tax allowance, Tax rate reduction |
| Budget | |
| Intensity | 60,0  % |
| Duration | 1.1.2023 — 31.12.2027 |
| Economic sectors | All economic sectors eligible to receive aid |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Lietuvos Respublikos ekonomikos ir inovacijų ministerija |
| Gedimino pr. 38, LT-01104 Vilnius |

Date of adoption of the decision

21.4.2023

Aid number

SA.106647

Member State

Lithuania

Region

Lithuania

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Lietuvos Respublikos 2022-2027 metų regioninės plėtros žemėlapis

Legal basis

Lietuvos Respublikos regioninės plėtros įstatymas Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės nutarimo ‘Dėl Lietuvos Respublikos 2022-2027 metų regioninės pagalbos žemėlapio’ pakeitimo projektas pridedamas

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Regional development (including territorial cooperation)

Form of aid

Direct grant, Tax allowance, Tax rate reduction

Budget

Intensity

60,0  %

Duration

1.1.2023 — 31.12.2027

Economic sectors

All economic sectors eligible to receive aid

Name and address of the granting authority

Lietuvos Respublikos ekonomikos ir inovacijų ministerija

Gedimino pr. 38, LT-01104 Vilnius

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
STATE v. CAMPBELL.

No. COA04-403.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed January 4, 2005.

Certification Date January 24, 2005.

Case reported without published opinion. No error in 03CRS6431, judgment arrested in 03CRS6432.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5095 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on filament tow of rayon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 22, 2008 

Mr. COBLE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on filament 

tow of rayon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FILAMENT TOW OF RAYON. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.23.27 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 filament tow of rayon) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/ 

7 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5095 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the consolidated financial condition of the company as                of the                dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the company                for                the periods presented. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         |                                   |                                   |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                         |                                   |                                   |
| August              14, 2007 |                                        | /s/              Theodore G. Hollinger |
|                         | Theodore                G. Hollinger,  |
|                         | Chief                Executive Officer |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-2319

JOHN NGECHU NJOGU,

Petitioner,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 25, 2014

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rev. Uduak James Ubom, UBOM LAW GROUP, PLLC, Washington, D.C., 

for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General, 

Carl McIntyre, Assistant Director, Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Office 

of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Ngechu Njogu, a native and citizen of Kenya, 

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider and reopen. 

We deny the petition for review. 

Njogu devotes most of his appellate brief to the 

Board’s order dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s 

July 18, 2013 decision denying relief and ordering him removed. 

We note that Njogu did not file a timely petition for review 

from the July 18, 2013 order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (2012); 

Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 394, 405 (1995). Thus, we do not 

have jurisdiction to review this order. We further note that 

Njogu does not attempt to challenge that part of the Board’s 

September 27, 2013 order denying reconsideration. Accordingly, 

review is waived. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(9); Ngarurih v. 

Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7 (4th Cir. 2004) (failure to 

challenge the denial of relief results in abandoning review). 

Insofar as Njogu challenges the denial of reopening, 

we have reviewed the record and conclude that the Board did not 

abuse its discretion in finding that Njogu failed to present 

newly available evidence that would warrant reopening. See 8 

C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (2013). We also find no error with the 

Board’s disposition of Njogu’s belated request for voluntary 

departure. 
3

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT 12(a)
                                  -------------

                       CHASE PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION
                Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
                -------------------------------------------------


                                            For the Year          For the Year
(in thousands, except ratio):              Ended 12/31/99        Ended 12/31/98
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income                                  $     70,127          $    76,559
                                            ------------          -----------

Fixed charges:
      Advisory fees                                  250                  250
                                            ------------          -----------

Total fixed charges                                  250                  250
                                            ------------          -----------

Earnings before fixed charges               $     70,377          $    76,809
                                            ============          ===========

Fixed charges, as above                     $        250          $       250
                                            ============          ===========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                281.51               307.24
                                            ============          ===========
================================================================================


                                      -30-
Exhibit 33.22

 

|  |
|--|

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2019, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank (the “Servicer”).

National Tax Search, LLC (“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2019 and for the period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”).  NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.  Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report.  NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report.  The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2019 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2019 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo

Executive,Operations

January 30, 2020
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant To Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Inhibitex, Inc.
(the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    
    The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ William D. JohnstonPresident and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Russell H. PlumbVice President, Finance and Administration,Chief Financial OfficerNovember 15, 2004
 30