alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAUSE NO. 03-14-00334- CR

TERAN PENNICK § IN THE THIRD § V. § COURT OF APPEALS § STATE OF TEXAS § OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FILING APPELLANT’S BRIEF

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS:

COM ES NOW, Teran Pennick, the Appellant, in the above styled and numbered

cause, and files this motion for an extension to June 12, 2015, to file the appellate brief.

In support of this motion, appellant shows the following:

I.

The appellant was convicted in the County Court at Law No. 6 of Travis County,

Texas, in Cause Number C1CR13200027 styled State of Texas vs. Jose Sosa. The

appellant pled not guilty, and had a jury trial. At the conclusion of the trial, appellant was

found guilty and sentenced to 1 year in the Travis County Jail, probated for 2 years. A

timely notice of appeal was filed in this case. The appellant's brief is due May 13, 2015.

II.

The reason for the extension of the deadline to file the appellant’s brief is based on

the following:

Due to confusion regarding the counsel of record for Mr. Pennick, the reporter’s ACCEPTED 03-14-00334-CR 5272798 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/13/2015 3:54:20 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKrecord in the case was never requested and therefore has not been submitted to this court.

Arrangements are being made for the record to be submitted so that Appellant’s atto rney

may review it and prepare a brief in a timely manner.

For these reasons, counsel moves that the deadline for the brief be extended until

June 12 , 201 5

.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

/s/ David W. Crawford David W. Crawford State Bar No. 24031601 Crawford and Cruz PLLC P.O. Box 686 Austin, Texas 787 59 Telephone (512) 795

- 2000 Telefacsimile (512) 237

- 7792 Email: d crawford@crawfordcruz.com Attorney for AppellantCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing instrument

has been furnished to the Attorney for the State presently assigned to this case, via fax

.

Date : May 13 , 201 5

/s/ David W. Crawford Attorney for AppellantCAUSE NO. 03

- 14

- 00334

- CR

TERAN PENNICK § IN THE THIRD § V. § COURT OF APPEALS § STATE OF TEXAS § OF THE STATE OF TEXAS

ORDER

On this day of ______________, 201___, came to be heard Appellant’s Motion for

Extension of Time to File Appellant’s Brief, and it appears to the court that this motion

should be:

_________ GRANTED

_________ DENIED

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the time for filing the appellant’s brief in Caus e No.

04

- 12

- 00714

- CR ____________ be extended to _______________, 201__.

SIGNED and ENTERED this __ day of ____________, 201_

_.

__________________________

JUDGE PRESIDING
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1432 

To amend the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 

2013, to modify the amounts appropriated for the Federal Aviation 

Administration, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 9, 2013 

Mr. COTTON (for himself, Mr. HUDSON, and Mr. BRALEY of Iowa) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Appropriations 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2013, to modify the amounts appropriated 

for the Federal Aviation Administration, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Air Traffic Control 

5 Tower Funding Restoration Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1432 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINIS2 TRATION FUNDING. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title VIII of Division F of the 

4 Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 

5 2013, is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 1811. Notwithstanding section 1101, the level 

7 for ‘Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Ad8 ministration, Operations’ shall be $9,703,395,000: Pro9 vided, That the amounts specified in the matter under the 

10 heading ‘Federal Aviation Administration—Operations’ in 

11 title I of the Transportation, Housing and Urban Develop12 ment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2012 (di13 vision C of Public Law 112–55; 125 Stat. 645) shall be 

14 applied to funds appropriated by this division— 

15 ‘‘(1) by substituting ‘$7,492,738,000’ for 

16 ‘$7,442,738,000’; and 

17 ‘‘(2) by substituting ‘$10,350,000 shall be for 

18 the contract tower cost-sharing program and not less 

19 than $130,500,000 shall be for the contract tower 

20 program for contract towers in operation as of Feb21 ruary 1, 2013’ for ‘$10,350,000 shall be for the con22 tract tower cost-sharing program’.’’. 

23 (b) OFFSETTING RESCISSIONS.—Of amounts appro24 priated for fiscal years before fiscal year 2013 that remain 

25 available for obligation as of the date of the enactment 

26 of this Act and that are not designated an emergency reVerDate Mar 15 2010 00:28 Apr 12, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1432.IH H1432

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1432 IH

1 quirement pursuant to a concurrent resolution on the 

2 budget or the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit 

3 Control Act of 1985, the following amounts are rescinded 

4 from the following accounts: 

5 (1) ‘‘Department of Transportation, Federal 

6 Aviation Administration, Facilities and Equipment’’, 

7 $23,861,002. 

8 (2) ‘‘Department of Transportation, Federal 

9 Aviation Administration, Research, Engineering, and 

10 Development’’, $26,183,998. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
STATE v. WALKER.

No. COA04-1020.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Forsyth (03CRS51472).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Henry Marshall BAILEY.

No. 34P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 5, 2004.

Jarvis John Edgerton, IV, Raleigh, for Bailey.

William M. Polk, Director of Victims and Citizens, Raleigh, James E. Hardin, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 20th day of January 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of February 2004."
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4925 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fluorobenzene. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. SPRATT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Fluorobenzene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLUOROBENZENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.05 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Fluorobenzene) is amended by striking the date in the ef7 fective period column and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4925 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.8



Summary of Modification of Relocation Assistance Terms Provided under Offer Letter Between Glen Messina and Ocwen Financial Corporation (“Company”) dated April 17, 2018 


Pursuant to the Offer Letter, the Company agreed to offer Mr. Messina reimbursement for commuting expenses incurred prior to August 15, 2019 and home sale assistance provided by a relocation services company, including a guaranteed offer program. The Company’s total cost for reimbursement for costs and expenses relating to Mr. Messina’s relocation (including under the guaranteed offer program but excluding the cost of the temporary commuting) would be limited to $500,000.  Effective April 11, 2019, following changes in the terms of the guaranteed offer program provided by the relocation services company, Mr. Messina agreed to forgo the services of the relocation services company and assume all costs and responsibilities for his relocation, including the sale of his home. In exchange, Mr. Messina received a lump-sum amount equal to the difference between the $500,000 limit on relocation expenses outlined in the Offer Letter and the amount he had been reimbursed to-date under the relocation program (excluding commuting expenses as described above). In addition, the Company agreed to extend reimbursement for Mr. Messina’s commuting expenses through December 31, 2019. Mr. Messina agreed that in the event he resigns from his position within one year of receipt of the lump sum payment, he will be required to reimburse the Company for all amounts paid, a total of $500,000.
HINSON v. HARRIS STEEL ERECTORS, INC.

No. COA04-745.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed June 7, 2005.

Certification Date June 27, 2005.

Appeal from NC Industrial Commission (I.C. #927717)

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4778 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exempt negative pressure 

wound therapy pumps and related supplies and accessories from the 

Medicare competitive acquisition program until the clinical comparability 

of such products can be validated. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2007 

Mr. GONZALEZ introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exempt 

negative pressure wound therapy pumps and related supplies and accessories from the Medicare competitive acquisition program until the clinical comparability of such 

products can be validated. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare Wound Ther5 apy Patient Protection Act of 2007’’. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4778 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND 

2 THERAPY PUMPS AND RELATED SUPPLIES 

3 AND ACCESSORIES FROM THE MEDICARE 

4 COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION PROGRAM UNTIL 

5 THE CLINICAL COMPARABILITY OF SUCH 

6 PRODUCTS CAN BE VALIDATED. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1847(a)(2)(A) of the So8 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–3(a)(2)(A)) is amend9 ed by inserting before the period at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘and excluding negative pressure wound therapy pumps 

11 and related supplies and accessories until such time as the 

12 Secretary can validate, using a panel of wound care clin13 ical experts, the clinical comparability of all products in14 cluded in the category of such products’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall take effect on March 31, 2008. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6262

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus HERBERT FREEMAN DAVIS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CA-00-3608) Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Herbert Freeman Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Herbert Davis appeals the district court’s order construing his motion challenging the computation of his sentence as a habeaspetition and transferring it to the Middle District of Pennsylvania, where he is currently incarcerated, on that basis. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Davis , No. CA-00-3608 (D.S.C. Jan. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DANIEL SCHWARTZ,

Petitioner

v.

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 416 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Charley Changmin Yoon, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2018-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 15, 2019



| | By: | /s/ Charley Changmin Yoon                                    
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Charley Changmin Yoon                                  
| |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Jimmy Dale McPHAIL and Cheryl D. McPhail v. Billy Nelson McPHAIL.

No. 161P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

August 12, 2004.

Billy McPhail, Pro Se.

T. Dewey Mooring, Jr., La Grange, for Jimmy McPail, Cheryl McPhail.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 5th day of April 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004."
Exhibit



 



Exhibit 10.2
AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT
This AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT, effective June 21, 2019 is by and between CIRCOR International, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (the “Company”) and Chadi Chahine (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into an executive change in control agreement made as of January 7th, 2019 (the “Agreement”); 
WHEREAS, the Agreement generally provided for double trigger vesting for equity awards;
WHEREAS, the Company has granted equity awards to the Executive after the date of the Agreement;
WHEREAS, the parties desire to clarify that the provisions of this Agreement apply to  all equity awards upon Change of Control;.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive, each intending to be legally bound hereby, do mutually covenant and agree as follows:
1.    Paragraph 3(c) is hereby amended by adding the following immediately after the second sentence thereof:


“For the avoidance of doubt, the vesting of all Equity Awards shall be subject to this Paragraph 3(c), nothing in the award agreements for such Equity Awards shall be construed to preempt or otherwise override it, and references to “Participant” refer to the Executive.”


2.    The Agreement otherwise remains in full force and effect as to all other provisions under said Agreement.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed the Amendment as of the date first above written.
CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.


By:                         
Name:    Andrew Farnsworth
Title:    CHRO











EXECUTIVE


By:                         
Name:    Chadi Chahine
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****RULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commerce EnergyGroup, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/ A(Amendment No. 3) for the quarterly period endingJanuary 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), StevenS. Boss, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to his knowledge:          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and result of    operations of the Company. By:     /s/ STEVEN S. BOSS       Steven S. Boss     Chief Executive Officer     (Principal Executive Officer)Date: October 31, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6718

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MATTHEW JAMES DURY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (1:08-cr-00016-MR-1)

Submitted: October 16, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020

Before WYNN and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew James Dury, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Matthew James Dury appeals the district court’s order denying his postjudgment 

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dury, No. 1:08-cr-00016-MR1 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5067 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on thiophanate methyl. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2008 

Mr. SESTAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on thiophanate 

methyl. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. THIOPHANATE METHYL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.77 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 thiophanate methyl) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HR 5067 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
# Official Journal L 45/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 45 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6318 February 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 45

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6318 February 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2020/213 of 17 February 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe | 1 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/214 of 17 February 2020 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus | 3 |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/215 of 17 February 2020 amending Decision 2011/101/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe | 4 |
| | * | Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/216 of 17 February 2020 on the appointment of the Vice-Chair and two further full-time members of the Single Resolution Board | 8 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2020/213 of 17 February 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 314/2004 concerning certain restrictive measures in respect of Zimbabwe

1

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/214 of 17 February 2020 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

3

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/215 of 17 February 2020 amending Decision 2011/101/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Zimbabwe

4

*

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/216 of 17 February 2020 on the appointment of the Vice-Chair and two further full-time members of the Single Resolution Board

8

| | | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Corrigendum to Council Decision (EU) 2019/2196 of 19 December 2019 amending Decision 2013/755/EU on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Union (‘Overseas Association Decision’) ( OJ L 337, 30.12.2019 ) | 10 |

Corrigenda

*

Corrigendum to Council Decision (EU) 2019/2196 of 19 December 2019 amending Decision 2013/755/EU on the association of the overseas countries and territories with the European Union (‘Overseas Association Decision’) ( OJ L 337, 30.12.2019 )

( OJ L 337, 30.12.2019 )

10

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.