alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 4894 

To provide liability protection in Federal court for educators and school 

administrators, who are working within the scope of their employment, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2007 

Mr. GOHMERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To provide liability protection in Federal court for educators 

and school administrators, who are working within the 

scope of their employment, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Educational Immunity 

5 Act of 2005’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIABILITY PROTECTION IN FEDERAL COURT FOR 

7 EDUCATORS AND SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—An educator or school adminis9 trator in a pre-K–12 school is not liable, in Federal court, 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
2 

•HR 4894 IH

1 for damages of any nature or any other legal or equitable 

2 remedy, for any act or omission in the course and scope 

3 of that employment, except as provided in this section. 

4 (b) EXCEPTIONS.—The liability protection in sub5 section (a) does not apply to— 

6 (1) liability under a contract; or 

7 (2) conduct punishable as a crime. 

8 (c) ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS.—If any teacher or 

9 school administrator is sued and the case is dismissed or 

10 no liability found against such teacher or administrator, 

11 the person immunized hereunder is entitled to be reim12 bursed for actual attorneys fees, all court related costs, 

13 fees and expenses, as well as out of pocket monies ex14 pended or lost arising out of or related to the litigation. 

15 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

16 (1) The term ‘‘pre-K–12 school’’ means a 

17 school, whether public or private, for one or more 

18 grades from pre-kindergarten through grade 12. 

19 (2) The term ‘‘educator’’ includes a teacher, a 

20 teaching assistant, a guest lecturer, and a librarian. 

21 (3) The term ‘‘school administrator’’ includes a 

22 principal, an assistant principal, a Superintendent, 

23 Assistant Superintendent, or their employees. 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
3 

•HR 4894 IH

1 (4) The term ‘‘employed’’ includes work on an 

2 unpaid basis. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS_CN
**Exhibit 10.5**

 

**Summary ofAudit Committee Chairman Compensation (Effective January 1, 2006)**

 

TheAudit Committee Chairperson of Fieldstone Investment Corporation is paid thefollowing fees: 

 
| Annual retainer                                                   |   | $40,000                                                                        |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Annual retainer for Audit  Committee Chairman                     |   | $10,000                                                                        |
| Fee for each board and  committee meeting attended in person      |   | $2,500 ($5,000 per meeting for the Chairman of the Board or of the  Committee) |
| Fee for each board and  committee meeting attended telephonically |   | $1,250 ($2,500 per meeting for the Chairman of the Board or of the  Committee) |

 

Non-employeedirectors are reimbursed for their reasonable travel expenses incurred inconnection with their attendance at board meetings.

 

----
```
 
 
MSCI EAFE MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                                    Code-244041
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/27/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      113,111
COMMITMENTS
  20,551   13,255    5,689   81,036   90,930  107,276  109,874    5,835    3,237

CHANGES FROM 05/20/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:        590)
   2,156     -605     -612     -859    1,727      685      510      -95       80

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    18.2     11.7      5.0     71.6     80.4     94.8     97.1      5.2      2.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:       97)
      14        7        2       54       39       68       48
 
 
MSCI EMERGING MKTS MINI INDEX - NYSE LIFFE                           Code-244042
FUTURES ONLY POSITIONS AS OF 05/27/14                         |
--------------------------------------------------------------| NONREPORTABLE
      NON-COMMERCIAL      |   COMMERCIAL    |      TOTAL      |   POSITIONS
--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------
  LONG  | SHORT  |SPREADS |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT  |  LONG  | SHORT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(MSCI EAFE INDEX X $50)                              OPEN INTEREST:      304,900
COMMITMENTS
 101,613   35,407    1,743  184,527  261,956  287,883  299,106   17,017    5,794

CHANGES FROM 05/20/14 (CHANGE IN OPEN INTEREST:      8,958)
   7,098     -942     -570    2,984   11,491    9,512    9,979     -554   -1,021

PERCENT OF OPEN INTEREST FOR EACH CATEGORY OF TRADERS
    33.3     11.6      0.6     60.5     85.9     94.4     98.1      5.6      1.9

NUMBER OF TRADERS IN EACH CATEGORY (TOTAL TRADERS:      212)
      64       31       14       86       67      156      106
```

----

Updated May 30, 2014
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 27, 2022

NO. 03-22-00281-CV

Wesley Perkins, Appellant

v.

Southside Wrecker, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKER, AND KELLY

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on May 17, 2022. Having reviewed 

the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, 

both in this Court and in the court below.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0202

_________________ ST ATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SE IDEL PINE,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to a five - justice panel of this Court. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Robert J . Whelan , Distric t Ju dge . For the Court,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 28 2023

06/28/2023
Case Number: DA 21-0202
In re PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY FAILURE. Edwin L. King, and Patricia C. King, Plaintiffs v. Speedway Motorsports, Inc., and Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc., doing business as Lowe's Motor Speedway, and Tindall Corporation formerly Tindall Concrete Products, Inc., Defendants. Bryan Heath Baker and wife, Susan D. Baker, Tammy L. Hepler, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of John A. Hepler, III, Steven P. Vanderhoof, Margaret F. Lindsey, and Walter Sudderth, Plaintiffs v. Speedway Motorsports, Inc., and Charlotte Motor Speedway, Inc., doing business as Lowe's Motor Speedway, and Tindall Corporation formerly, Tindall Concrete Products, Inc., Defendants.

No. 302P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Marvin K. Blount, Jr., Greenville, for Patricia C. King.

*203David N. Allen, Patrick J. Fogarty, Charlotte, for Speedway Motorsports.

James T. Williams, Jr., Reid L. Phillips, Greensboro, for Tindall Corporation.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff (Patricia C. King) on the 17th day of June 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."

Justice MARTIN recused.
EXHIBIT
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:
                        August 10, 2007
                
                /s/ Steven
                          R. MummaChief
                            Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of GNC Corporation (the Company), for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), Robert J. DiNicola, as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
and Curtis J. Larrimer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of his knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Robert J. DiNicolaName:
    
    Robert J. DiNicolaTitle:
    
    Interim Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    May 10, 2005/s/ Curtis J. LarrimerName:
    
    Curtis J. LarrimerTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    May 10, 2005
 This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Ocean Facts
3. How do coral reefs protect lives and property?

**How do coral reefs protect lives and property?**  Coral reefs provide a buffer, protecting our coasts from waves, storms, and floods. a coral reef*Corals form barriers to protect the shoreline from waves and storms.* The coral reef structure buffers shorelines against waves, storms, and floods, helping to prevent loss of life, property damage, and erosion. When reefs are damaged or destroyed, the absence of this natural barrier can increase the damage to coastal communities from normal wave action and violent storms. 
Several million people live in U.S. coastal areas adjacent to or near coral reefs. Some coastal development is required to provide necessary infrastructure for coastal residents and the  growing coastal tourism industry. However, the impacts of coastal development  (e.g., marina, dock, and bridge construction, dredging to replenish beaches) and  polluted runoff from coastal areas can damage coral reefs over the long term.  Therefore, the health of coral reefs depends on sustainable coastal development practices that protect sensitive coral ecosystems and the creatures that reside there.
 More **Information** NOAA Coral Reef Conservation Program U.S. Coral Reef Task Force NOAA Coral Reef Information System Corals Tutorial Coral Reefs: Rainforests of the Sea   Get **Social** Social
  **Last updated:** 01/20/23 **Author:** NOAA How to cite this article Contact Us
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13(a)-14(b) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Commerce Energy Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ending January 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Peter Weigand, President (principal executive
officer) of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: March 17, 2005
    By:
    /s/ PETER WEIGANDPETER WEIGANDPresident
(Principal Executive Officer)
STATE of North Carolina v. Thomas T. DILLARD, Jr.

No. 146P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 6, 2005.

Thomas T. Dillard, Jr., Pro Se.

Amy C. Kunstling, Assistant Attorney General, Charles W. Hipps, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th day of March 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of April 2005."
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-10580

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Alonso Perez, Jr., 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:20-CR-32-6

______________________________

Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Alonso Perez, Jr., has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 9, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10580 Document: 00516671127 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/09/2023
No. 22-10580

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-10580 Document: 00516671127 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/09/2023
STATE v. Roland Lee WATTS, Jr.

No. 70P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Michael K. Lands, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 27th day of January 2005 by Defendant to Proceed In Forma Pauperis:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Jay D. Nielsen, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company,LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. Theregistrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financialreporting. 

|     |  |                                         |
|-----|--|-----------------------------------------|
| By: |  | /s/ Jay D. Nielsen                      |
|     |  | Jay D. Nielsen*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

  

Date: April 5, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10K FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             166
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,285
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     21,723<F1>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,857
<PP&E>                                          18,513
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,444
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,768
<BONDS>                                         18,058<F2>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,444
<SALES>                                         16,259
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,259
<CGS>                                           15,957
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,757<F3>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,165)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                      (1,038)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,203)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.88)
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS COSTS AND ESTIMATED EARNINGS IN EXCESS OF BILLINGS.
<F2>REPRESENTS OBLIGATIONS UNDER CAPITAL LEASES AND LONG TERM DEBT.
<F3>INCLUDES PROJECT COSTS AND OPERATING EXPENSES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Paul Averback, President and CEO
of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation, do hereby certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2005 of Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations on
Nymox Pharmaceutical Corporation

Date: June 30, 2006

| | /s/
Paul Averback, MDPaul
Averback, MDPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNymox Pharmaceutical Corporation
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------