alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00754-CR

NO. 14-18-00755-CR

LARESHA LEONARD, Appellant 

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 337th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. 1550735 & 1550736 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant was convicted of two counts of robbery. On October 17, 2018, the 

trial court granted appellant’s motion for new trial in both cases. The State has not 

appealed the grant of new trial. 

Generally, we only have jurisdiction to consider appeals by a criminal 

defendant in which there has been judgments of conviction. Courson v. State, 996 
2

S.W.2d 348, 349 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. dism’d). Because 

appellant has been granted new trials, there are no final convictions to appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Zimmerer, and Spain. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
CITY OF BURLINGTON v. PUBLISHERS.

No. 518PA04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 23, 2005.

Robert M. Ward, Burlington, for City of Burlington.

Hugh Stevens, Raleigh, for Boney Publishers.

Andrew L. Romanet, Jr., Gregory F. Schwitzgebel, III, Raleigh, for N.C. League of Municipalities.

John A. Bussian, Mark J. Prak, Raleigh, for Press and Broadcasters.

*139Julia F. Youngman, Raleigh, for Am. Civil Liberties Union of NC.

Robert N. Hunter, Jr., Greensboro, for John Locke Foundation.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of March 2005 by Plaintiff for Leave to File a Reply Brief:

"Motion Allowed. By order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of March 2005."
Exhibit 32.6



QUADRAMED CORPORATION

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2 of QuadraMed Corporation for the period ended December 31, 2004, I, David L. Piazza, Chief Financial Officer of QuadraMed Corporation, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my best knowledge:



1. This Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2 for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and



2. The information contained in this Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2
for the period ended December 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of QuadraMed Corporation.



|                      |  |                                        
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: January 4, 2006 |  | /s/ David L. Piazza                    
|                      |  | David L. Piazza Chief Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Helicos BioSciences Corporation (the "Company") for the
period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we Ronald A. Lowy, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company and Stephen
P. Hall, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our
knowledge that:



Dated: August 14, 2009

/s/ RONALD A. LOWY Ronald A. Lowy Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: August 14, 2009

/s/ STEPHEN P. HALL Stephen P. Hall Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 494 Engrossed in House (EH)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 494

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To provide for the conditional conveyance of any interest retained by 
 the United States in St. Joseph Memorial Hall in St. Joseph, Michigan.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF RETAINED INTEREST IN ST. JOSEPH MEMORIAL HALL.

    (a) In General.--Subject to the terms and conditions of subsection 
(c), the Administrator of General Services shall convey to the city of 
St. Joseph, Michigan, by quitclaim deed, any interest retained by the 
United States in St. Joseph Memorial Hall.
    (b) St. Joseph Memorial Hall Defined.--In this section, the term 
``St. Joseph Memorial Hall'' means the property subject to a conveyance 
from the Secretary of Commerce to the city of St. Joseph, Michigan, by 
quitclaim deed dated May 9, 1936, recorded in Liber 310, at page 404, 
in the Register of Deeds for Berrien County, Michigan.
    (c) Terms and Conditions.--The conveyance under subsection (a) 
shall be subject to the following terms and conditions:
            (1) Consideration.--As consideration for the conveyance 
        under subsection (a), the city of St. Joseph, Michigan, shall 
        pay $10,000 to the United States.
            (2) Additional terms and conditions.--The Administrator may 
        require such additional terms and conditions for the conveyance 
        under subsection (a) as the Administrator considers appropriate 
        to protect the interests of the United States.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 27, 2007.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 494

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To provide for the conditional conveyance of any interest retained by 
 the United States in St. Joseph Memorial Hall in St. Joseph, Michigan.
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

I, Bruce D. Hansen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of General Moly, Inc. for thequarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information containedin such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of General Moly, Inc.

 

Dated: May 6,2010

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Bruce D.  Hansen          |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Bruce D. Hansen               |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |   | (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

1

----
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Erin E. West, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProCentury Corporation (“ProCentury”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for ProCentury and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to ProCentury,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of ProCentury’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in ProCentury’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during ProCentury’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ProCentury’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ProCentury’s auditors and theaudit committee of ProCentury’s board of directors: a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectProCentury’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in ProCentury’s internal control over financial reporting.   August 3, 2007 Date     /s/ Erin E. West   Signature     Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   Title  
41
STATE of North Carolina v. Derrick Dewayne BYERS.

No. 599P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

David Childers, Mount Holly, for Derrick Byers.

Melissa L. Trippe, Special Deputy Attorney General, R. Stuart Albright, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 29th day of November 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 4th day of May 2005."
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Jay D. Nielsen, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company, LLC; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hospira, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Christopher B.Begley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  Christopher B. Begley |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
| Christopher B. Begley           |
| Chief Executive Officer         |
| August 12, 2004            |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Hospira, Inc. and will be retained byHospira, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

1

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5135 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.5135

                       One Hundred Tenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
            the third day of January, two thousand and eight

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, as the ``Sergeant Jamie O. 
                     Maugans Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT JAMIE O. MAUGANS POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Sergeant Jamie O. Maugans Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Jamie O. Maugans Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Hydrogen Engine Center, Inc. (the
      "company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Sandra Batt, Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the consolidated financial condition of the company as of
              the
              dates presented and consolidated results of operations of the company
              for
              the periods presented.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




November
              14, 2008
            
            /s/SANDRA
              BATTSandra
                Batt
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              (Principal
                Financial Officer)






This
      certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 15-541V 

Filed: September 10, 2015 

Unpublished 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

WINIFRED CAMPBELL, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

 * Influenza (“Flu”) Vaccine; Shoulder 

 * Injury Related to Vaccine Administration 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); Special Processing Unit 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SPU”) 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Brian L. Cinelli, Marcus & Cinelli, LLP, Williamsville, NY, for petitioner. 

Heather Pearlman, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On May 27, 2015, Winifred Campbell filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 [the 

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]. Petitioner alleges that as a result of an influenza [“flu”] 

vaccination on October 23, 2013, she suffered adhesive capsulitis. Petition at 1. The 

case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters. 

On September 9, 2015, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she 

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1, 4. Specifically, respondent indicates that she “believes that petitioner’s 

alleged injury is consistent with a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration 

(‘SIRVA’)” and that “petitioner met the statutory requirements by suffering the condition 

for more than six months.” Id. at 4. 

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to 

post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 

note (2006)). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that 

petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      14,902,578              14,377,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,270,151               2,713,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,554,705               1,001,851
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,161,972              17,874,290
<PP&E>                                      11,658,926              14,098,364
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,185,441               8,229,821
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,504,537              24,521,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,586,561               1,440,479
<BONDS>                                        488,579                 239,929
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,331                  12,753
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,665,716              22,541,579
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,504,537              24,521,065
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,821,125              16,132,206
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             3,870,925               1,690,293
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             111,578                  59,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,745,277)               (773,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (848,267)                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,897,010)               (773,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,897,010)               (773,583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.48)                   (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.48)                   (.12)
        

</TABLE>
Joseph Marion HEAD v. STATE of NC.

No. 629P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 17th day of December 2004 by Plaintiff for Relief:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."