alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2016104EN.01000101.xml

| 20.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 104/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 104/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2016/602

of 23 March 2016

on the signing and conclusion of the Participation Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 37 thereof, in conjunction with Article 218(5) and (6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article 10(4) of Council Decision 2014/486/CFSP (1) provides that detailed arrangements regarding the participation of third States are to be covered by agreements concluded in accordance with Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 10(4) of Council Decision 2014/486/CFSP (1) provides that detailed arrangements regarding the participation of third States are to be covered by agreements concluded in accordance with Article 37 of the Treaty on European Union.

| (2) | On 7 December 2015, the Council adopted a Decision authorising the opening of negotiations for a Participation Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (‘the Agreement’). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 7 December 2015, the Council adopted a Decision authorising the opening of negotiations for a Participation Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (‘the Agreement’).

| (3) | The Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Participation Agreement between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the participation of the Swiss Confederation in the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) is hereby approved on behalf of the Union.

The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement in order to bind the Union.

Article 3

The President of the Council shall, on behalf of the Union, give the notification provided for in Article 9(1) of the Agreement.

Article 4

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2016.

For the Council

The President

A.G. KOENDERS

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/486/CFSP of 22 July 2014 on the European Union Advisory Mission for Civilian Security Sector Reform Ukraine (EUAM Ukraine) (OJ L 217, 23.7.2014, p. 42).

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 17, 2009

0414 

# Order

April 17, 2009

138433 & (12)(13)

THOMAS WELGOSH and MARIE ANNE WELGOSH, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 138433 COA: 290196 Oakland CC: 2002-042140-CH TRI-MOUNT CUSTOM HOMES, INC., and MARK DEMBS, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal prior to decision by the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the Co urt is not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court before considerati on by the Court of Appeals. The motion to stay arbitration proceedings is DENIED as moot.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5071 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5071

    To extend the suspension of duty on Poly(toluene diisocyanate).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2008

Mr. Tim Murphy of Pennsylvania introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend the suspension of duty on Poly(toluene diisocyanate).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. POLY(TOLUENE DIISOCYANATE).

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.12.04 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to Poly(toluene diisocyanate)) 
is amended by striking ``12/31/2009'' and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
STATE v. SIMMONS.

No. COA04-1042.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed April 19, 2005.

Certification Date May 9, 2005.

Appeal from Rowan (02CRS8888, 02CRS53424, 02CRS55616, 02CRS55729, 03CRS8069, 03CRS54928, 03CRS59686, 03CRS59857, 03CRS59860, 04CRS6).

Case reported without published opinion. Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5014 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5014

   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on oysters (other than 
                    smoked), prepared or preserved.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 16, 2008

Mrs. Tauscher introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend the temporary suspension of duty on oysters (other than 
                    smoked), prepared or preserved.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OYSTERS (OTHER THAN SMOKED), PREPARED OR PRESERVED.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.23.07 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to oysters (other than smoked), 
prepared or preserved) is amended by striking the date in the effective 
period column and inserting ``12/31/2011''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Jay D. Nielsen, certify that: 

     1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Beef Packing Company,LLC; 

     2. Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

     3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

     4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

     a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

     b)evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

     c)disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

     5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

     a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and 

     b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 

|   |   |                                    |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------|
| By:    |   | /s/ Jay D. Nielsen                      |
|   |   |                                    |
|   |   | Jay D. Nielsen*Chief Financial Officer* |

Date: July 11, 2008
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Richard W. McCullough                    | May 10, 2011 |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------------|
| Richard W. McCullough                              |         |
| Chief Executive Officer                            |         |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |         |
| Managing General Partner                           |         |
|                                               |         |
|                                               |         |
|  /s/ Gysle R. Shellum                         | May 10, 2011 |
| Gysle R. Shellum                                   |         |
| Chief Financial Officer                            |         |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |         |
| Managing General Partner                           |         |

----
# C_2016111EN.01000201.xml

| 29.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/2

---

DECISION OF THE GENERAL COURT

of 27 January 2016

on judicial vacations

(2016/C 111/02)

THE GENERAL COURT

Having regard to Article 41(2) of the Rules of Procedure,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Article 1

For the judicial year beginning on 1 September 2016, the dates of the judicial vacations within the meaning of Article 41(2) and (6) of the Rules of Procedure are as follows:

| — | Christmas 2016: from Monday 19 December 2016 to Sunday 8 January 2017 inclusive, |
| --- | --- |

—

Christmas 2016: from Monday 19 December 2016 to Sunday 8 January 2017 inclusive,

| — | Easter 2017: from Monday 10 April 2017 to Sunday 23 April 2017 inclusive, |
| --- | --- |

—

Easter 2017: from Monday 10 April 2017 to Sunday 23 April 2017 inclusive,

| — | Summer 2017: from Friday 21 July 2017 to Sunday 3 September 2017 inclusive. |
| --- | --- |

—

Summer 2017: from Friday 21 July 2017 to Sunday 3 September 2017 inclusive.

Article 2

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

Luxembourg, 27 January 2016.

Registrar

E. COULON

President

M. JAEGER

---
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1705/2005

of 18 October 2005         

determining the world market price for unginned cotton

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Protocol 4 on cotton, annexed to the Act of Accession of Greece, as last amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1050/2001 (1),

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 of 22 May 2001 on production aid for cotton (2), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The world price for unginned cotton as referred to in Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 1051/2001 is hereby determined as equalling 22,439 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 19 October 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 October 2005.

For the Commission

J. M. SILVA RODRÍGUEZ            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 1.

(2)OJ L 148, 1.6.2001, p. 3.

(3)OJ L 210, 3.8.2001, p. 10. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1486/2002 (OJ L 223, 20.8.2002, p. 3).

----
#### John Michael HIGGINS, Appellant, v. Walter S. BINNS, U. S. Atty., and United States of America, Appellees.

No. 13784.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 29, 1953.

John Michael Higgins, in pro. per., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Walter S. Binns, U. S. Atty., Ray H. Kinnison, Norman W. Neulcom and Lelia F. Bulgrin, Asst. U. S. Attys., Los An-geles, Cal., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges, and McCOEMICK, District Judge,

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the South*654ern District of California denying John Michael Higgins’ petition for the writ of habeas corpus. Judge Yankwich, presiding, said in his order: “If appears from the exhibit attached to the petition and from the files of the Court that similar petitions have been addressed to this Court and denied. It also appears from the face of the petition that the petitioner is not entitled to the writ. 28 U.S.C. § 2243. No new matter is stated in the petition. 28 U. S.C. § 2244. For these reasons the petition for writ is denied.”

The pertinent facts are related in an opinion by this court entitled Higgins v. U.S.A., 9 Cir., 1953, No. 13,497, 205 F.2d 650, decided and filed this day. The parties have stipulated that the record in Higgins v. U.S.A., supra, being No. 13,497, may be consulted in consideration of the instant appeal, and that the briefs in No. 13,497 may be consulted as briefs in the instant appeal insofar as they are applicable, and that this appeal may be and is submitted.

We agse in accord with the order from which we have quoted and, in addition thereto, the treatment of the points raised and treated in the companion case and our decision therein are conclusive as reasons for affirming the order in the instant case.

Affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,939,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               46,116,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   827,000
<INVENTORY>                                 41,378,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            93,169,000
<PP&E>                                      61,433,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              32,407,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             126,637,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       59,420,000
<BONDS>                                     18,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,676,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               126,637,000
<SALES>                                    312,511,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           312,511,000
<CGS>                                      283,521,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              283,521,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               653,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,776,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,876,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,808,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,068,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,068,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.60
        

</TABLE>
# L_2016017EN.01000901.xml

| 26.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 17/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 17/9

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/84

of 20 January 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Ternera de Aliste (PGI)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Ternera de Aliste’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Spain's application to register the name ‘Ternera de Aliste’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Ternera de Aliste’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Ternera de Aliste’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Ternera de Aliste’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.1. Fresh meat (and offal), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 January 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 281, 26.8.2015, p. 8.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Cassation, Belgium, by order of that court of 6 September 2005 in the criminal proceedings against Norma Kraaijenbrink

(Case C-367/05)

(2006/C 48/21)

Language of the case: Dutch

Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Court of Cassation, Belgium, of 6 September 2005, received at the Court Registry on 29 September 2005, in the criminal proceedings against Norma Kraaijenbrink on the following questions:

----

(1)OJ 2000, L 239, p. 19.

----
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1440/2006

of 29 September 2006         

fixing the maximum aid for concentrated butter for the 17th individual invitation to tender opened under the standing invitation to tender provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1898/2005

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 of 17 May 1999 on the common organisation of the market in milk and milk products (1), and in particular Article 10 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 17th individual tender under the standing invitation to tender opened in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1898/2005 the maximum amount of the aid for concentrated butter with a minimum fat content of 96 %, as referred to in Article 47(1) of that Regulation, is fixed at 19,8 EUR/100 kg,

The end-use security provided for in Article 53(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1898/2005 is fixed at 22 EUR/100 kg.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 30 September 2006.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 September 2006.

For the Commission

Jean-Luc DEMARTY            

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

----

(1)OJ L 160, 26.6.1999, p. 48. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1913/2005 (OJ L 307, 25.11.2005, p. 2).

(2)OJ L 308, 25.11.2005, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2107/2005 (OJ L 337, 22.12.2005, p. 20).

----
Bradly M. CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner, v. COLUMBIA PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., et al.

No. 19-6544

Supreme Court of the United States.

January 13, 2020

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis* denied, and the petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8.