alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.22
 
  - Revised -
 CONFIDENTIAL




---



##### 



(a)
    
    Following a Change in Control: All unvested stock options and Restricted
Stock Shares previously awarded shall be 100% vested effective as of the date of such
Change in Control or upon termination following such Change in Control plus one years
compensation to include both your current base compensation and either (a) the agreed
guaranteed bonus (if such termination occurs in the calendar years 2006 or 2007) or
(b) a target bonus of no less than 50% of the current base compensation.(b)
    
    Termination for cause as defined in section 6(f)(3) of the Stock Option Plan,
any unvested part of the options shall lapse immediately upon the earlier of the
occurrence of such event or the last day that you are employed by or affiliated with
the Company.(c)
    
    Termination voluntarily without cause: In the event your employment or
affiliation with the Company ceases for any reason other than (a) (b) or (d) or death
or retirement, all unvested stock options shall expire thirty days following the last
day of employment. However, should you be terminated prior to the first anniversary of
your initial employment date, you will immediately vest in 25% of you initial stock
option grant (25,000 stock options shares) and these shares will be exercisable
consistent with the terms provided in the Companys 1996 Stock Option Plan. all
Restricted Stock Shares previously awarded shall be 100% vested immediately upon
termination.




---



##### 



(d)
    
    In the event that you are terminated involuntarily without cause: Stock
options previously awarded to you shall continue to vest for two years from the date
of termination (as though you were still employed by the Company) consistent with the
Companys 1996 Stock Option Plan. All Restricted Stock Shares previously awarded shall
be 100% vested immediately upon termination. In addition, you will receive one years
compensation to include both your current base compensation and either (a) the agreed
guaranteed bonus (if such termination occurs in the calendar years 2006 or 2007) or
(b) a target bonus of no less than 50% of the current base compensation.(e)
    
    In either the event of a Change in Control or termination for
cause,
voluntarily or involuntarily, you will also be paid any unused vacation entitlement.
   Pioneering Medicines for a
Better Life
U.S. flag An official website of the United States government.
				Here's how you know we're official. **Official websites use .gov** A **.gov** website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
 **Secure websites use HTTPS** A small lock or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to a .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Toggle navigation Toggle search National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
 Search
					Search National Ocean Service


Home
				Ocean Facts

				Topics
					Explore All Topics 
                        Arctic 
                        Careers 
                        Economy 
                        Ecosystems 
                        Geodesy 
                        Hazards 
                        International
                        Navigation 
                        Observations 
                        Ocean 
                        Recreation 
                         Sea Level Rise 
                        Story Maps 
                        Tools
                
                			Education

				
				News
				Podcasts
				Video
				Images
				About Us


1. Home
2. Ocean Video

Ocean Economy: American Blue Economy Ocean as a Lab: Fish Farms (Ocean Today) Bluefin Tuna (Ocean Today) The Making of a Super Storm (Ocean Today)
 Browse Ocean Video  By Category Ocean Basics Ocean Life Ocean Economy Ocean Ecosystems Health & Safety Maritime Transportation Positioning and Geology Ocean Technology Tides and Currents Ocean Observations Ocean and Coastal Places Ocean and Coastal Science     **Search** Our Stories    Get **Social**


Feedback Provide Feedback
							Contact Us
							Report an error
 Social Instagram Logo/a>


*Science. Service.Stewardship.*
 About NOS About Us
							NOS Program Offices
							Media Inquiries
							Website Acknowledgements
                            Site Index
							Disclaimer
 More Resources Freedom of Information Act
							Accessibility
							Information Quality
							Privacy Policy
							NOS For Employees
							USA.gov
 Department of Commerce
									National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
									National Ocean Service
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4944 

To suspend temporarily the duty on nesoi hubs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on nesoi hubs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NESOI HUBS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Hubs, nesoi (provided for in 

subheading 8714.93.35) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4944 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of PortaltoChina.com, Inc. on Form
10-QSB  for the quarter ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the "Report"), I, Paul Fong, Chief
Executive  Officer,  President,  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)     The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



Date:  January  8,  2008     By: /s/ Caroline Rechia
                                 Caroline  Rechia
                                 President  &  Chief  Financial  Officer
STATE of North Carolina v. Levi BASH.

No. 51P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 3, 2005.

Levi Bash, Pro Se.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Thomas J. Keith, District Attorney, for State of NC.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 21st day of January 2005 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005."
Stuart A. MIDDLETON v. STATE of North Carolina.

No. 386P04-2.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Stuart A. Middleton, Pro Se.

John G. Barnwell, Assistant Attorney General, C. Colon Willoughby, Jr., District Attorney, for State of NC.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Plaintiff on the 16th day of December 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of February 2005."
Exhibit 21

|SUBSIDIARIES OF STEINER LEISURE LIMITED
|---------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary                     
|Owned by Steiner Leisure Limited       
|Cosmetics Limited                      
|                                       
|Steiner Spa Asia Limited               
|                                       
|Steiner Spa Resorts Limited            
|                                       
|Steiner Transocean Limited             
|                                       
|Steiner U.S. Holdings, Inc.            
|                                       
|Owned by Steiner U.S. Holdings, Inc.   
|Florida Luxury Spa Group, Inc.         
|                                       
|Mandara PSLV, LLC                      
|                                       
|Mandara Spa (Hawaii) LLC               
|                                       
|Steiner Beauty Products, Inc.          
|                                       
|Steiner Education Group, Inc.          
|                                       
|Steiner Management Services, LLC       
|                                       
|Steiner Spa Resorts (Connecticut), Inc.
|                                       
|Steiner Spa Resorts (Nevada), Inc.     
|                                       
|Owned by Steiner Education Group, Inc. 
|FCNH, Inc.                             
|                                       
|Mid-Atlantic Massage Therapy, Inc.     
|                                       
|Virginia Massage Therapy, Inc.         
|                                       
|Owned by Steiner Transocean Limited    
|Mandara (Cruise I) LLC                 
|                                       
|Mandara (Cruise II) LLC                
|                                       
|Owned by Steiner Spa Asia Limited      
|Mandara Spa Asia Limited               
|                                       
|Owned by Steiner Spa Limited           
|Mandara Spa LLC                        
|                                       

Owned by Cosmetics Limited

|Elemis Limited | United Kingdom
|-------------- | --------------
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 431

EX PA R TE BILL Y D O N SM I TH , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. 2 0 0 6 - 1 4 6 5 - C2 I N T HE 1 9 TH DI S TR I CT COURT

FROM M CLENNAN CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this application for a writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant wa s convicted o f o n e count of
a g g ra vate d s e xua l a ssa

ult and thr e e c ounts of

ind e c e nc y

wi th a c hil d and

se nte nc e d to fi ft e e ny e ars ’ imprisonment on each c ount. The TenthCourt of Appea ls affirme d his convictions. Sm ith v . S tate , No. 10-07-00126- CR (Tex. App.–W aco 2008, pe t ref’ d ). Ap pli c ant c onte nd s, amon goth e r t hin g s, that he wa s su

bje c te d to mul tip le punis hme nts in violation of the Double J eopar dy Clause and that his trial counsel r ender ed inef fec tive assistance
.2

On Marc h 3 , 2 0 1 0, we r emande d this application for finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. On
r e ma n d , th e tr ia l c o urt m a d e f in d in g s an d c o n c lu s io n s an d r e c o mm e n d e d

th at w e d e n y

r e li e f
. We ag ree that trial counsel wa s not ine ffe ctive. Howeve r, based on our own independe nt r eview of the
re c or d, we fi nd

that Ap pli c ant c omm itt e d a sin g le a c t w he n h e tou c he d th e c omp la ina nt’ s g e nit a ls (Count I I ) and digitally penetr ated her sex ual orga n (Count I ). The jur

y could not have c onvicted and punished Applicant for

both of these of

fense s. Ev an s v . S

tate , 2 99 S.W. 3d

13 8, 14 1- 42 (T e x. Cr im. App. 2009). Whe n a de fe nd ant is su bje c te d to mul tip le punis hme nts in vio lation o f t he D ouble J eopar dy Clause, the appr opriate remedy is to retain the most serious offe nse and se t aside the other(s)
. Bi

go n v . S tate , 252 S.W .3d 360, 372-73 (Te x . Crim. App. 2008). Acc ording ly , Applicant’s conviction for inde cenc y wi t h a ch i l d , Count I I , in cause number 2006-1465-C2 from the 19th J udicial District Court of McL ennan County is set aside. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depar

tment of Criminal J ustice–Corre ctional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Par oles Division. Deliver ed: Octobe r 6, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of National Beef Packing Company, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended February 26, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy M. Klein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:
/s/ Timothy M. KleinTimothy M. KleinChief Executive OfficerDate: April 8, 2011
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Erin E. West, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProCentury Corporation (“ProCentury”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. ProCentury’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for ProCentury and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating toProCentury, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of ProCentury’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in ProCentury’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during ProCentury’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ProCentury’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. ProCentury’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ProCentury’s auditors and theaudit committee of ProCentury’s board of directors: d) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectProCentury’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  e) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in ProCentury’s internal control over financial reporting.   May 10, 2006   Date     /s/ Erin E. West   Signature     Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   Title  
33
STATE v. MERRITT.

No. COA03-1503.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 6, 2004.

Certification Date July 26, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
**Exhibit 3.1(b)**

 

 

**Exhibit D**

 

**Appraisal ProcessAgreement**

 

 

**Agreement for Appraisal Process under Section 12.5.**

 

            In the event that TKKInvestments, LLC or TMKCo, LLC (each an “Appraisal Party” and collectively as“Appraisal Parties”) give an Appraisal Election Notice under Section 12.5.1 ofthe National Beef Packing Company, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement(“LLC Agreement”) then each of the Appraisal Parties agree that the AppraisalValue under Section 12.5.3 of the LLC Agreement is the EBITDA of the Companymultiplied by six, minus the outstanding debt of the Company, with the EBITDAdetermined as the four quarter average of the trailing eight fiscal quartersdetermined from the most recent financial statements filed as the Company’sAnnual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or auditor reviewedquarterly financial statements of the Company (in the preceding order ofpriority) prior to the date of the Appraisal Election Notice.  

 

**Agreement For Klein EntityLiquidation Value Prior To Appraisal Process**

 

**           **In the eventthat TKK Investments, LLC or TMKCo, LLC (the “Klein Entities”), are required tosell or liquidate some or all of the Units held by the Klein Entities prior toAugust 6, 2011 (the next Klein Entities appraisal process start date), theCompany agrees that the price for the Units held by the Klein Entities that arerequired to be sold or redeemed will not be less than the Appraisal Valueagreed to in the above paragraph for appraisal under Section 12.5, and theCompany will add to the price to be paid to the Klein Entities so that the saleor redemption price is not less than the Appraisal Value.
IN RE T.S.A.

No. COA04-1057

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Union (01J227, 01J228)

Case reported without published opinion Affirmed
STATE v. WHITAKER.

No. COA04-1612.

Court of Appeal of North Carolina

Filed August 2, 2005.

Certification Date August 22, 2005.

Appeal from the Rowan (02CRS52985)

Case reported without published opinion Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1556

ZIAD AKL, M.D., F.A.C.P,
Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.
VIRGINIA HOSPITAL CENTER ARLINGTON HEALTH SYSTEM; INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.; YORKE ALLEN, MD; GARY BROWN, ESQ.; M. ANTHONY CASOLARO, MD; JAMES COLE; WILLIAM DOUGHERTY, MD; BETH DYSON-MUSKOPF; JOHN GARRETT, MD; ROBERT HOLMAN, MD; FRANK MCGRATH, MD; ARCHIE MCPHERSON, MD; TALAL MUNASIFI, MD; BONNIE O’HARE; LAURA PEDERSON, RN; MARLANA PLEGER, RN; STEVEN ZIMMET, MD,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00073-CMH)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: April 16, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Rosenau, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Deborah B. Baum, PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Ziad Akl appeals from the district court’s order
granting the Defendants’ motion and dismissing his complaint in
which he alleged numerous claims arising from the revocation of
his medical privileges at the Virginia Hospital Center-Arlington
Health Systems. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint
appendix, and the district court’s opinion and order and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Akl v. Virginia Hosp.

Ctr. , No. 1:07-cv-00073-CMH (E.D. Va. July 18, 2007); see
Modaber v. Culpeper Mem. Hosp. Inc. , 674 F.2d 1023, 1026 (4th
Cir. 1982). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 5048 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 5048

           To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetoacetamide.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 17, 2008

  Mr. Garrett of New Jersey introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on Acetoacetamide.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACETOACETAMIDE.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.01.00      Acetoacetamide      Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         (CAS No. 5977-14-                                                  31/2011
                         0) (provided for
                         in subheading
                         2924.19.11)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 3.1(a)**

 

 

 

**Exhibit C**

 

**Redemption ofUnits**

 

 

Section 6.6 ofthe National Beef Packing Company, LLC Limited Liability Company Agreementshall be amended by adding a new paragraph immediately ahead of the lastnon-lettered paragraph of Section 6.6, which shall read:

 

Notwithstanding thegrant of authority to the Board of Managers pursuant to Section 7.14 andnotwithstanding other provisions of this Agreement, any modifications oralterations in the rights, preferences or privileges of any Class of Units heldby TKK Investments, LLC or TMKCo, LLC are subject to the consent of Klein asthe principal of TKK Investments, LLC and TMKCo, LLC, unless the Company treatsall Members, including TKK Investments, LLC and TMKCo, ratably based on theirholdings of the Class of Units.
ACCEPTED12-14-00116-CRTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS1/15/2015 12:18:12 PMCATHY LUSKCLERK
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) ofInfoSonics Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2006,Jeffrey Klausner, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: November 14, 2006 | /s/ Jeffrey Klausner |
|--------------------------|---------------------------|
|                     | Jeffrey Klausner,         |
|                     | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----