alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, June 22, 2022; 2:00 p.m.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held remotely.

# STATUS: 

Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

# Matter To Be Considered:

*Decisional Matter:*                         Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Safety Standard for Recreational Off-Highway Vehicle and Utility Task/Terrain Vehicle Debris Penetration Hazards.                    

                        All attendees should pre-register for the Commission meeting using the following link:                         *https://cpsc.webex.com/​cpsc/​onstage/​g.php?​MTID=​e4deb22642fc939114f31638cbcb5057e*.                    

After registering you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting.

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, June 22, 2022; 2:00 p.m. (immediately following the conclusion of the Public Commission Meeting).

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held remotely.

# STATUS: 

Commission Meeting—Closed to the Public.

# Matter To Be Considered:

*Briefing Matter:*                         Commission staff will brief the Commission on a compliance matter.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Alberta E. Mills, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, 301-504-7479 (Office) or 240-863-8938 (Cell).

Dated: June 15, 2022.

Alberta E. Mills,

Commission Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2022-13254 Filed 6-15-22; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 5064 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ziram. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 17, 2008 

Mr. SESTAK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Ziram. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ZIRAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.13.97 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Ziram) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2009’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘12/31/2011’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on PRODPC61 with BILLS
Aaron Richard ESTES v. STATE.

No. 28P05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Roxann Vaneekhoven, District Attorney, for State.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 11th day of January 2005 by Plaintiff for an order compelling the SBI to release any or all DNA/Toxicology Reports:

> "Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
DENIED and Opinion Filed April 24, 2024 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 24
- 00476
- CV IN RE ELECTRONICS RESEARCH, INC. AND E R I INSTALLATIONS, INC. , Relators Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 24
- 00060
- D MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Smith, and Garcia Opinion by Justice Garcia Before the Court is relators’ April 22, 2024 petition for writ of mandamus. Relators challenge the tr ial court’s April 15, 2024 order wherein the trial court denied relators’ Motion for Protection and granted real party in interest’s Motion to Compel Jurisdictional Discovery Regarding Defendants’ Special Appearance.
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion and that relators lack an adequate appellate remedy. In

re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135

– 36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding)

. Relators bear the burden of providing the Court with a sufficient record to show they are entitled to relief. Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex.– 2

–

1992) (orig. proceeding). Because the parties in an original proceeding assemble their own record, this Court strictly enforces the require ments of rule 52 to ensure the integrity of the mandamus record. In re Vasquez , No. 05

- 15

- 00592

- CV, 2015 WL 2375504, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Dallas May 18, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Here, relators filed an appendix with their petition and a separate man damus record. But none of the documents relators included in their appendix and record is a sworn or certified copy as required by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 52.3(k)(1)(A ), 52.7(a)(1). We thus conclude relators failed to meet their burden to provide a sufficient record. In any event, even if relators cured this defect, we conclude that relators failed to demonstrate a clear abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ o f mandamus. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P . 52.8(a). Also before the Court is relators’ April 22, 2024 motion for immediate temporary relief. We deny relators’ motion as moot. Additionally, relators’ separately filed mandamus record contains unredacted sensitive data, including a minor’s full birth date, in violation of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.9. Accordingly, we strike relators’ separately– 3

–

filed mandamus record.

240476 F.P05 /Dennise Garcia/ DENNISE GARCIA JUSTICE
I 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 4974 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain perfluorocarbons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 15, 2008 

Mr. RAMSTAD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain perfluorocarbons. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN PERFLUOROCARBONS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.01.00 Perfluorocarbons comprised 

of carbon, fluorine, and optionally nitrogen and/or oxygen, with no other halogens 

or functional end groups, 

ranging in size from 5 to 18 

carbon atoms (CAS No. 

86058–42–1) (provided for 

in subheading 3824.90.92) .. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2011 ’’. 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HR 4974 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to articles entered, or withdrawn 

3 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
      REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350(AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002)





I,
Charles R. Eitel, as Chief Executive Officer of Simmons Company (the “Company”),
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that to my knowledge:





(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 28, 2008
(the “Report”), being filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  August
4, 2008       /s/ Charles R.
Eitel


Name: Charles
R. Eitel


Title: Chief Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Simmons Company and will be retained by Simmons Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2016041EN.01000101.xml

| 18.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 41/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 41/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2016/222

of 5 February 2016

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (ម្រេចកំពត Mrech Kampot)/Poivre de Kampot (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Cambodia's application to register the name ‘ម្រេចកំពត’ (Mrech Kampot)/‘Poivre de Kampot’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Cambodia's application to register the name ‘ម្រេចកំពត’ (Mrech Kampot)/‘Poivre de Kampot’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘ម្រេចកំពត’ (Mrech Kampot)/‘Poivre de Kampot’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘ម្រេចកំពត’ (Mrech Kampot)/‘Poivre de Kampot’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘ម្រេចកំពត’ (Mrech Kampot)/‘Poivre de Kampot’ (PGI) is hereby registered.

The name referred to in the first paragraph identifies a product in Class 1.8. ‘other products listed in Annex I to the Treaty (spices etc.)’ set out in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 February 2016.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Phil HOGAN

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 265, 13.8.2015, p. 7.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of New York Mortgage Trust, Inc., (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
                November 9, 2006/s/ Steven
                R. MummaSteven
                R. MummaChief
                Financial Officer
STATE v. Joseph Marion HEAD.

No. 629P04-3.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

May 4, 2005.

William P. Hart, Special Deputy Attorney General, Jeff Hunt, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 20th day of April 2005 by Defendant for the Relief asked for and demanded within the state and federal prison and court records and etc. records relating thereto based on the asserted within said records:

"Motion Dismissed by order of the Court in conference this the 4th day of May 2005."
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION
      1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) by
      China Fire & Security Group, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Brian Lin, hereby
      certify that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.




Dated:
                November 13, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Brian LinName:Brian
                LinTitle:  
                Chief Executive Officer
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited

under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 4/26/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

RONALD CLASSEN, 

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 95-2095

v. (D.C. No. CIV-94-1445-JP)

JOE SPRUNK, Warden; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW

MEXICO, 

(D. N.M.)

Respondents - Appellees.

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, McKAY and LUCERO, Circuit Judges.

After examining the Appellant’s brief and appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination

of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore

ordered submitted without oral argument.
1

 It is impossible to determine for certain from Mr. Classen’s petition, but it

appears that he is in administrative segregation. Generally, “[a]dministrative segregation

may be imposed when an inmate poses a threat to security, when disciplinary charges are

pending against an inmate, or when an inmate requires protection.” Hewitt v. Helms, 459

U.S. 460, 463 n.1 (1983).

2

This matter is before the court on Petitioner’s Application for Certificate of

Probable Cause. We issue the certificate and proceed to the merits of the case.

Petitioner Ronald Classen, an inmate at the Cibola County Corrections Center in

Milan, New Mexico, brought this pro se and in forma pauperis action under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254. Mr. Classen is serving a nine-year sentence for statutory rape and contributing to

the delinquency of a minor. It appears that Mr. Classen’s complaints stem from his

custody level classification, which he considers too restrictive.1

In his petition, Mr. Classen asserted six grounds for habeas relief. First, he

claimed that his due process rights have been violated because prison officials have

abused their discretion by misapplying statutes to justify their setting of his custody level. 

Second, he asserted he was denied due process because he had no opportunity to present

his arguments at a hearing regarding his custody level classification. Third, he claimed

New Mexico’s inmate release program is unconstitutional because it grants prison

officials punitive decision-making powers. In his fourth and fifth claims, he asserted that
3

his custody level classification by the New Mexico Department of Corrections violated

his equal protection rights. Sixth, he claimed his Eighth Amendment rights were violated

because he is housed in an overcrowded facility without programming and gradual

reintegration through a work release program.

We have carefully reviewed the district court’s dismissal of Mr. Classen’s claims,

and we find no reversible error.

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

PHARMACOPEIA, INC.

 

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Pharmacopeia, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JosephA. Mollica, Ph.D., Chairman of the Board and Interim President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    | /s/ Joseph A. Mollica, Ph.D.                                       |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph A. Mollica, Ph.D.                                                |
|   | Chairman of the Board and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)                                           |
|   | May 8, 2008                                                        |

 

----
Exhibit 10.2



		

			Exhibit 10.2

		


		

			 

		




		
			NCS MULTISTAGE HOLDINGS, INC.
		

		
			EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN FOR US EMPLOYEES
(As Effective August 3, 2017)
 
		

		
			Second Amendment
		

		
			 
		

		
			NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), having reserved to the Company’s Compensation, Nominating and Governance Committee (the “Committee”) the right under Section 18.8 of the NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan for US Employees, as effective as of August 3, 2017 and as thereafter amended (the “Plan”), to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan, as follows:
		

		
			Effective as of July 1, 2019, Section 6.2 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:
		

		
			“Election Changes. During an Offering Period, a Participant may not change the rate of his or her payroll deductions applicable to such Offering Period.  A Participant may decrease or increase his or her rate of payroll deductions for future Offering Periods by submitting a new Enrollment Form authorizing the new rate of payroll deductions within the time period prescribed by the Company prior to the start of the next Offering Period. However, a Participant may withdraw from the Plan in accordance with Section 9.”
		

		
			 
		

		
			EXECUTED this 1st day of July, 2019, but effective as of the date set forth above.
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						﻿

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ John Deane

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						John Deane, Chairman

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						Compensation, Nominating and Governance

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						Committee of NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE


OFFICER
REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING


FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS









I, Neil
Smit, the President and Chief Executive Officer of CCO Holdings, LLC and CCO
Holdings Capital Corp. (the "Company") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that, the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission:




·
            fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and




·
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









/s/ Neil
Smit


Neil
Smit


President and Chief
Executive Officer


May 14,
2009