alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Peter Weigand, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Commerce EnergyGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant andhave:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internalcontrols over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal controls over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.     Date: December 15, 2004 By: /s/ PETER WEIGAND      PETER WEIGAND   President   (Principal Executive Officer)
STATE v. Sammy C. PERKINS.

No. 60A94-4.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

September 23, 2004.

Edwin L. West, III, Wilmington, for Perkins.

Steven M. Arbogast, Special Deputy Attorney General, Clark Everett, District Attorney, for State of NC.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 16th day of September 2004 by Defendant to Vacate Disproportionate and Excessive Death Sentence:

> "Motion Denied by order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of September 2004."
**Exhibit 10.4**

 

 

August3, 2006

DavidM. Floyd, Ph.D.
| Re: |   | Amendment to Severance Agreement dated  December 2, 2004 and amended November 3, 2005   between Pharmacopeia Drug Discovery, Inc. (“Pharmacopeia”) and David M. Floyd    (the “Agreement”) |
|-----|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dear Dr. Floyd:

Referenceis made to the Agreement.

Inconsideration of your continued employment by Pharmacopeia, Pharmacopeia andyou hereby agree to amend and restate Section 3(a)  (Taxes—General) of the Agreement in itsentirety as follows:

Section 3(a)

“**3.  TAXES.** (a)  General.  Employee will be responsible for the paymentof any tax liability incurred as a result of this Agreement.  The Company may withhold tax on any paymentsor benefits provided to Employee as required by law or regulation.  Notwithstanding anything herein to thecontrary, if any payments due under this Agreement would subject the Employeeto any tax imposed under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of1986, as amended (the “Code”) if such payments were made at the time otherwiseprovided herein, then the payments that cause such taxation shall be payable ina single lump sum on the first day which is at least six months after the dateof the Employee’s “separation of service” as set forth in Code Section 409Aand the regulations issued thereunder.”

[Theremainder of this page intentionally left blank.]

----

 

Ifyou are in agreement with the terms of this letter agreement please sign belowand return one copy to my attention.
| Very truly yours,                     |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
| /s/ Leslie J. Browne, Ph.D.           |
|                                  |
| Leslie J. Browne, Ph.D.               |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                  |
|                                  |
| ACKNOWLEDGED, AGREED AND              |
| ACCEPTED THIS 3RD DAY OF              |
| AUGUST, 2006                          |
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/ David M. Floyd                    |   |
| David M. Floyd                        |
| Executive Vice President and          |
| Chief Scientific Officer              |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Helicos BioSciences Corporation (the "Company") for the
period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we Ronald A. Lowy, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company and Jeffrey
R. Moore, the Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to our knowledge that:



Dated: August 16, 2010

/s/ RONALD A. LOWY Ronald A. Lowy President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: August 16, 2010

/s/ JEFFREY R. MOORE Jeffrey R. Moore Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUITORS


We consent to the reference to our firm under the captions
"Independent Auditors" and "Financial Highlights" and to the use of
our report dated December 15, 1999, which is incorporated by
reference, in this Registration Statement (Form N-1A, No. 33-11716)
of Smith Barney Investment Series (formerly, Concert Investment
Series).


	ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
October 9, 2000
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with thefiling of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) of InfoSonicsCorporation (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2008,Joseph Ram, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934  (15U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: November 14, 2008 |     | /s/ JOSEPH RAM                      |
|------------------------------|----------|------------------------------------------|
|                         |     | Joseph Ram,                              |
| * *                     | * * | *Chief Executive Officer and  President* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.1


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Four M Corporation and Subsidiaries

         We  consent to the use of our  report  dated  October  11,  1996,  with
respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  of Four M  Corporation  and
subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K ("Annual Report") and to
the  reference to our firm under the heading  "Selected  Financial  Data" in the
Annual Report.

                                        /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                                        --------------------

Valhalla, NY
December 12, 1996
STATE v. JONES

No. COA04-908

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Filed February 1, 2005

Certification Date February 21, 2005

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE of North Carolina v. Stephan David BROOKS.

No. 215P02-5.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

February 3, 2005.

Stephan D. Brooks, Pro Se.

Christopher W. Brooks, Assistant Attorney General, for State.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 18th day of June 2004 in this matter for a writ of mandamus, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the Superior Court, Mecklenburg County:

> "Denied by order of the Court in Conference this the 3rd day of February 2005."
COLUMBUS COUNTY EX REL. COLLINS v. DAVIS.

No. COA04-255.

North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Filed April 5, 2005.

Certification Date April 25, 2005.

Appeal from Columbus (00CVD1770).

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
STATE v. MANNING.

No. COA03-1631.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed July 20, 2004.

Certification Date August 9, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Lianyun Han, Chief Executive Officer of SHUAIYI INTERNATIONAL NEW RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT INC. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

1.

The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
 ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
 Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
 Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 13th day of August 2009.

/s/ Lianyun Han   
Lianyun Han 
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Shuaiyi International New Resources Development Inc. and will be retained by Shuaiyi International New Resources Development Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

---
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ProCentury Corporation (ProCentury);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of ProCentury as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    ProCenturys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for ProCentury and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to ProCentury,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of ProCenturys disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures as at the end of the period concerned by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in ProCenturys internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during ProCenturys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, ProCenturys internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    ProCenturys other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to ProCenturys auditors and the
audit committee of ProCenturys board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
ProCenturys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in ProCenturys internal control over financial reporting.
 May 12, 2008Date/s/ Edward F. FeighanSignatureChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive OfficerTitle
 41
JONES v. DAVIS.

No. 232A04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

November 23, 2004.

Urs R. Gsteiger, Elizabeth Horton, Howard C. Jones, II, Winston-Salem, for Jones, Southard, Bowers, Sammons.

Raymond A. Parker, Jonesville, for Davis and Allred.

Edwin M. Woltz, Surry County Attorney, Mount Airy, for Surry County.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 22nd day of November 2004 by Defendant To Be Allowed to File Amendment to Defendant's (Surry County) Brief:

> "Motion Allowed by order of the Court in conference this the 23rd day of November 2004."
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7717

MICHAEL BOYD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JANET RENO; KATHLEEN HAWKS; W. J. THOMPSON, Warden, FCI Morgantown; ANN BARTOLO, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-165) Submitted: June 30, 1998 Decided: August 4, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Boyd, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael Boyd appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Boyd v. United States , No. CA-96-165 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2016337EN.01000101.xml

| 13.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 337/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 337/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2016/2234

of 21 November 2016

on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (Asecna) on the development of satellite navigation and the provision of associated services in Asecna's area of competence for the benefit of civil aviation

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 172, in conjunction with Article 218(5),

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 25 September 2014, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate, on behalf of the Union, an international agreement with the Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar establishing the conditions for provision of a satellite-based augmentation service (SBAS) in Africa on the basis of the EGNOS European satellite navigation programme. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 25 September 2014, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate, on behalf of the Union, an international agreement with the Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar establishing the conditions for provision of a satellite-based augmentation service (SBAS) in Africa on the basis of the EGNOS European satellite navigation programme.

| (2) | Following the negotiations, the Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (Asecna) on the development of satellite navigation and the provision of associated services in Asecna's area of competence for the benefit of civil aviation (the ‘Agreement’) was initialled on 12 May 2016. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following the negotiations, the Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (Asecna) on the development of satellite navigation and the provision of associated services in Asecna's area of competence for the benefit of civil aviation (the ‘Agreement’) was initialled on 12 May 2016.

| (3) | The Agreement should be signed, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement should be signed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The signing on behalf of the Union of the Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the Agency for Aerial Navigation Safety in Africa and Madagascar (Asecna) on the development of satellite navigation and the provision of associated services in Asecna's area of competence for the benefit of civil aviation is authorised.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion.

Article 3

This decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 21 November 2016.

For the Council

The President

P. PLAVČAN

---
ROSA v. LONG

COA03-1074.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Filed August 17, 2004.

Certification Date September 7, 2004.

Case reported without published opinion. No error.
GREENWICH STREET SERIES FUND
on behalf of
Intermediate High Grade Portfolio (the "Portfolio")

Supplement dated February 25, 1998 to
Prospectus dated April 30, 1997

	The following information supplements, and to the extent 
inconsistent therewith supersedes, the information set forth in the 
Prospectus under "Management of the Fund."

For the investment advisory services provided to it by MMC, the 
Portfolio pays MMC an annual management fee calculated at a rate of 
0.40% of its average daily net assets, paid monthly.  The Portfolio 
also pays MMC an annual administration fee of 0.20% of its average 
daily net assets, paid monthly, for administrative services.











FD 01414
HomeOcean Facts

# What is an iceberg?

## An iceberg is ice that broke off from glaciers or shelf ice and is floating in open water.

Iceberg located in Ross Sea, Antarctica.

To be classified as an iceberg, the height of the ice must  be greater than 16 feet above sea level and the thickness must be  98-164 feet and the ice must cover an area of at least 5,382  square feet. 

There are smaller pieces of ice known as “bergy bits” and “growlers.”  Bergy bits and growlers can originate from glaciers or shelf ice, and may also  be the result of a large iceberg that has broken up. A bergy bit is a medium to  large fragment of ice. Its height is generally greater than three feet but less than 16 feet above sea level and its area is  normally about 1,076-3,229 square feet. Growlers are  smaller fragments of ice and are roughly the size of a truck or grand piano.  They extend less than three feet above the sea surface and occupy  an area of about 215 square feet.

Icebergs are also classified by shape, most commonly being  either tabular or non-tabular. Tabular icebergs have steep sides and a flat top.  Non-tabular icebergs have different shapes, with domes and spires.

Icebergs are monitored worldwide by the U.S. National Ice  Center (NIC). NIC produces analyses and forecasts of Arctic, Antarctic, Great  Lakes, and Chesapeake Bay ice conditions. NIC  is the only organization that names and tracks all Antarctic Icebergs. 

###### Get **Social**

###### More **Information**

          - U.S. National Ice Center
          - Arctic Navigation
          - Surveying in the Arctic (audio podcast)

**Last updated:**   01/18/24**Author:** NOAAHow to cite this article

Contact Us

            - Provide Feedback 
            -  Contact Us 
            -  Report an error 

##### Science. Service.Stewardship.

###### 						About NOS 					

            - About Us
            - NOS Program Offices
            - Media Inquiries
            - Website Acknowledgements

###### 						Resources 					

            - Site Index
            - Disclaimer
            - Freedom of Information Act
            - Accessibility

###### 						More Resources 					

            - Information Quality
            - Privacy Policy
            - NOS For Employees
            - USA.gov

          -  National Ocean Service
          -  National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
          -  Department of Commerce

##### 						Social 					

            - 
            - 
            - 
            - 
            -
Barbara ROBINSON v. Brenda M. DIXON (and North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, an unnamed defendant).

No. 388P04.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 6, 2004.

Jerry A. Allen, Jr., Goldsboro, for Farm Bureau.

A. Charles Ellis, Greenville, for Barbara Robinson.

***ORDER***

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant (North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company) on the 4th day of August 2004 in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the order of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

> "Dismissed as moot by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th day of October 2004."